Loading...
HPB-11-03-1999 NOVEMBER DELRAY BEACH • All-AmericaCity Y ' ' I Ic AGENDA 1993 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: November 3, 1999 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing,such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286.0105. I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • October 20, 1999 III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. COA-334-Continuation: Sundy Inn Complex, 106 South Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Michelle Balfoort, Architect and Authorized Agent. Consider Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Design Elements. B. COA-396: Zodiac Building, 125 North Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Jeff Silberstein, Architect and Authorized Agent. Consider a Mixed Use Addition (Office and Residential) to be Constructed to the Rear of an Existing Contributing Structure. C. COA-394: 129 South Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Mary Hubbs, Owner. Consider a Change in Roofing Material from Cement Tile to Composition Shingle; Exterior Paint Colors; and Front Parking Area Landscaping for a Noncontributing Triplex. D. COA-388-Continuation: The Music Club (Now Known as 32 Degrees) Associated with 32 East Restaurant, 16 East Atlantic Avenue, Old School Square Historic Arts District. Butch Johnson, Owner. Consider an Illuminated Wall Mounted Sign. HPB Meeting November 3, 1999 Page 2 E. COA-398-Continuation: Accents & Decor, Seaboard Airline Railroad Station at Historic Depot Square, West Atlantic Avenue and 1-95. Aldo Conigliaro, Owner. Consider a Change in Exterior Paint Colors. F. COA-377-Continuation: Rhoden Building, 2 East Atlantic Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Steve Cohen, Owner, Kelly Maudsley, Authorized Agent. Consider the Addition of an Enclosed Pipe on the West Elevation, which was not Included on the Approved Plans. G. COA-351-Continuation: Castle Florida Building, 150 North Swinton Avenue and COA-364 Dittman Federspeil Building, 151 NW 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Lloyd Hasner, Builder and Authorized Agent. Consider Non-Operable Exterior Shutters. IV. DISCUSSION AND ACTIONS ITEMS A. Consider Making a Recommendation to the City Commission that an Additional Building for the Expansion of the Historical Society's Facilities be Allowed to be Placed on the Northeast Corner of NE 1st Street and N. Swinton Avenue, to the West of Cason Cottage. B. Consider Making a Recommendation to the Planning & Zoning Board that LDR Section 4.4.24(6)(9) (Principal Uses and Structures) and 4.4.24(F)(1) (Development Standards) OSSHAD Zoning District be Amended to Add Lots 19 Through 24, Block 69 to Those Lots in OSSHAD Already Subject to the Central Business District (CBD) Zoning District Standards. V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Reports from Historic District Representatives B. Board Members C. Staff VI. ADJOURN Pat Cayc / Historic Preservation Planner Posted On: October 29, 1999 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 1999 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Vice-Chairperson at 6:05 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice-Chairperson Keller, Shane Ames, Mary Lou Jamison, John Johnson, Gail-Lee McDermott MEMBERS ABSENT: Susan Hurlburt STAFF PRESENT: Pat Cayce, Diane Dominguez, Michelle Hoyland, Diana Mund II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The Minutes for the Regular Meeting of October 20, 1999 were before the Board for consideration. Mr. Ames moved to approve the Minutes as presented. The motion was seconded by Ms. Jamison and passed 5-0. Mrs. Cayce informed the Board that Agenda Item III.A. has been removed from the agenda per the applicant's request. She then asked the Board to amend the agenda to hear Item IV.B. first. The Board was of the consensus to do so. IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS: B. Consider Making a Recommendation to the Planning & Zoning Board and City Commission that LDR Sections 4.4.24(B)(9) (Principal Uses and Structures) and 4.4.24(F)(1) (Development Standards) OSSHAD Zoning District be Amended to Add Lots 19 through 24, Block 69 to those Lots in OSSHAD Already Subject to the CBD Zoning District Standards. It was moved by Mr. Johnson, seconded by Mr. Ames and passed 5-0 to recommended to the Planning & Zoning Board and City Commission approval of the amendment to LDR Section 4.4.24 Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD), Subsections (B) Permitted Uses and (F) Development Standards. III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: A. COA 99-334 Continuation: Sundy Inn Complex, 106 S. Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Michelle Balfoort, Architect/Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering a COA for site plan, landscape plan, and design elements associated with the addition of six guest suites. Per the applicants request this item has been removed from the agenda. B. COA 99-396: Zodiac Building, 125 N. Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Jeff Silberstein, Architect/Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering a COA for site and landscape plans, building elevations and a waiver associated with a mixed use addition (office/residential) to be constructed to the rear of an existing contributing structure. It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. Jamison and passed 5-0 to continue COA 99-396, with the following direction: 1. That the plans be revised to reflect that the second floor will be converted to office space and that the required elevators be shown on the floor plan; and, 2. That the front (west elevation) entrance be redesigned to replicate the rear (east elevation). C. COA 99-394: 129 S. Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Mary Hubbs, Owner. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering a COA for a change in roofing material from flat cement tile to fiberglass shingle, change in exterior paint colors, parking area repair and upgrading the front yard landscaping for a nonconforming triplex. It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. Jamison and passed 4-1 (McDermott dissenting) to approve the change in roofing material, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(H), that undue economic hardship would result if the applicant were denied. It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5-0 to approve COA 99-394 for the landscape and driveway rehabilitation as presented and the color scheme as follows: 1. The roof is to be dark blue composition shingle; -2- HPB Minutes 11/03/99 2. The body of the structure is to be yellow; 3. The bricks, flashing and soffit are to be white; 4. The window grilles are to be removed; and, 5. If the chain link gate is not replaced with a wooden gate, it may be screened (covered) with black plastic mesh. D. COA 99-388 Continuation: 32 Degrees (aka The Music Club) Associated with 32 East Restaurant, 16 E. Atlantic Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Butch Johnson, Owner. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering a COA for an illuminated wall mounted sign. It was moved by Mr. Johnson, seconded by Mr. Ames and passed 5-0 to approve COA 99-388 Continuation for the flat wall sign as presented, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.7(E)(7). E. COA 99-398 Continuation: Accents & Decor, Seaboard Airline Railroad Station, Historic Depot Square, W. Atlantic Avenue & 1-95. Aldo Conigliaro, Owner. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering a COA for a change in exterior paint colors for the train station. It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. McDermott and passed 5-0 to approved COA 99-398 Continuation for the exterior paint colors as follows: • The same yellow and slate blue as were presented on the color board for Accents & Decor's "Something Sweet" store on E. Atlantic Avenue. F. COA 99-377 Continuation: Rhoden Building, 2 E. Atlantic Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Steve Cohen, Owner; Kelly Maudsley, Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering a COA for the addition of an enclosed vertical pipe on the west elevation, which was not included on the approved plans. It was moved by Mr. Johnson, seconded by Ms. Jamison and passed 3-2 (Ames & Keller dissenting) to approve COA 99-377 Continuation for the elevation change to allow the enclosed pipe on the west elevation to remain, with the following condition: • The pipe enclosure will be painted to match the building. -3- HPB Minutes 11/03/99 G. COA 99-351 Continuation: Castle Florida Construction, 150 N. Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Lloyd Hasner, Builder/Authorized Agent. COA 99-364 Continuation: Dittman Federspiel Building, 151 NW 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Lloyd Hasner, Builder/Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering COAs for inoperable decorative vinyl shutters to be mounted directly on the wall, which were not included on the approved plans. It was moved by Mr. Johnson to approve COAs 99-351 Continuation and 99- 364 Continuation for the elevation changes to allow the inoperable decorative vinyl shutters to remain. As there was no second said motion failed. It was moved by Mr. Ames, seconded by Ms. Jamison and passed 5-0 to approve COAs 99-351 Continuation and 99-364 Continuation for the elevation changes to allow the inoperable decorative vinyl shutters to remain with the following condition: • That black hinges and shutter dogs be installed on all shutters in a manner that makes the shutter appear operable. The shutter dogs are to be installed at the outer bottom corner. IV. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS: A. Consider Making a Recommendation to the City Commission that an Additional Building for the Expansion of the Historical Society's Facilities be Allowed to be Placed on Lot 8, Block 67, Located at the Northeast Corner of NE 1st Street and N. Swinton Avenue, to the West of Cason Cottage. After some discussion it was the Board's consensus that the open space west of Cason Cottage should be preserved and Cason Cottage should remain visible from N. Swinton Avenue. It was moved by Ms. Jamison, seconded by Mr. Ames and passed 5-0 to recommend to the City Commission that an additional building be allowed to be placed on Lot 7, Block 67, to the west of the Cason Cottage parking lot, to accommodate the expansion of the Delray Beach Historic Society's facilities. V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS: A. Reports from Historic District Representatives None -4- HPB Minutes 11/03/99 B. Board Members After a brief discussion by the Board it was determined that the Chairperson shall ask at the beginning of each item if any of the Board members had any Ex Parte Communications to declare. C. Staff Mrs. Cayce asked that the Board think about solutions for the Meditrainan Revival style front yard fencing. Mrs. Cayce asked that the Board think about not allowing nonoperable shutters. VI. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business before the Board, Mr. Ames moved to adjourn the meeting at 10:00 P.M., seconded by Ms. Jamison and passed 5-0. The undersigned is the Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for November 3, 1999, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on November 17, 1999. ILJ Diana Mund If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. -5- HPB Minutes 11/03/99 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD It ITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: November 3, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: Ill.A ITEM: Class IV Site Plan Modification Associated with the Addition of Six (6) Guest Suites at the Sundy Estates Residential Inn, Located at the southeast and northeast Corners of SW 1"Avenue and SW 1" Street. I UJU I I ULJ UJ■ N.W. 2ND Si. N.C. 2ND ST. ■ III i . . GENERAL DATA: I CITY . HALL I Owner Nauplius Limited & Yoyodyne M.S., III 1 N.W. 1ST ST N.E. 151 ST, Inc. _ Applicants/Agents Michelle Balfoort - W Location Southeast and northeast Corners of CONMUNR Y" z - CENTER Z SW 1"Avenue and SW 1' Street W - Property Size 2.11 Acres 3 > OLD Future Land Use Map Mixed Use 1I I i SQUARE z . ['Arent Zoning OSSHAD (Old School Square ATLANTIC AVENUE Historic Arts District) ( I Jacent Zoning North: OSSHAD I J 11 NI East: OSSHAD MN 7 South: OSSHAD IIII= I West: RM (Medium Density Residential) & CF (Community Facilities) `" • SW. 1ST ST. S.E. 1ST ST. • Existing Land Use Restaurant and Residential Inn. III I (III -i!iii:.:!:iii:ii:.!!i.'!. I I I -2/I ..• Proposed Land Use Site Plan Modification to allow the ? €Z addition of six (6) guest suites to an `"o existing residential inn. Water Service Existing on-site. N 3 - Sewer Service Existing on-site. ' IIII <n S.W. 2ND ST. S.E. 2ND S1. 11 - I /1 :' • • II . SW. 3RD ST. 5.E. 3RD ST. k II _ I1- - - -- ■ 1 ITEM' BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is that of approval of COA-334 which incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for Sundy Inn (106 S. Swinton Avenue), pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F): ❑ Site Plan (Class IV) ❑ Landscape Plan ❑ Design Elements The subject property is located on the south side of SW 1st Street, between S. Swinton Avenue and SW 1st Avenue, with an off-site parking area at the northeast corner of SW 1st Street and SW 1st Avenue, within the Old School Square Historic District. BACKGROUND The subject property consists of a Lots 1-3, Sundy Estates Plat (1.435 acres), Lots 9 and 10, Block 61, Town of Linton (0.45 acres), and Lot 11, Block 62, Town of Linton (0.24 acres) totaling 2.12 acres. The proposal also involves an off site parking area to be located on Lots 20-22, Block 70, Town of Linton (10 SE 1st Street). Sundy Inn/Restaurant Site (1.88 acres) In 1998, a site plan application was processed to establish a 23-guest room residential type inn, and a restaurant with outdoor dining, which incorporated the following: o Conversion of the two existing apartment structures to accommodate a total of 14 guest rooms; o Utilization of the existing single family residence as an inn unit; o Construction of a 2-story 8-guest room structure o Construction of building additions and outside dining areas to accommodate a total of 7,302 sq.ft. of restaurant area, o Installation of botanical gardens with a pond, o Installation of 29 on-site spaces, including 23-space asphalt parking lot at the south end of the development, o Installation of a swimming pool on the south side of the pond with a waterfall; o Installation of a 6' high c.b.s. wall along the perimeter of the site, except within the front yard facing Swinton Avenue, with electronic gates provided at the parking and service courtyard areas; and, o Construction of a 42-space parking area at the northeast corner of SW 1st Avenue and SW 1st Street, preservation of the existing cottage at the northeast corner of the property to be utilized for storage and a night watchman. The HPB (Historic Preservation Board) approved the site plan on March 18, 1998. In addition, numerous site plan modifications have been approved for the site. The most HPB Staff Report Sundy Inn -Site Plan Page 2 significant relates to changing the 8 unit building at the northwest corner of the site to 4 guest suites with 4 garage spaces on the first floor, conversion of the guest cottage at the northeast corner of the 42-space parking lot to a guest unit, and demolition of the 6- unit apartment building on the west side of the property and construction of a guest building containing 6 hotel units. Modifications also included increasing the outdoor dining area interior to the site to provide a total of 8,115 sq.ft. of restaurant floor area. The restaurant component and botanical gardens have been completed. The 42-space parking area north of the restaurant and the 2 spaces in front of the restaurant have been completed. The improvements associated with the 4-unit building at the northwest corner of the site have been completed, and improvements to the one unit building to the south are under construction. The residential inn itself is not yet operational. On October 5, 1999 City Commission approved a conditional use modification to expand the residential inn component from 23 to 29 rooms/suites by incorporating Lot 11, Block 62, Town of Linton. The request for site plan approval is now before the Board for action. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project is two phased and incorporates the following: Phase I. o Replacement of the proposed 23-space asphalt parking lot at the south end of the site with a 3-story 10-guest room structure, Building E ("The Stables"), and a 15- space subgrade parking area; o Provision of four units in the building at the northwest corner of the site, one (1) unit in the one-story guest cottage on the west side of the property, construction of a two-story 6-unit structure on the west side of the site; o Execution of an off-site parking agreement to utilize 16 spaces of the 20-space parking lot proposed at the southeast corner of S. Swinton Avenue and S.E. 1st Street. Phase II: o Construction of five (5) 400 sq. ft. hotel rooms in separate buildings/bungalows and a 300 sq.ft. greenhouse on the expanded portion of the site (Lot 11). o Provision of two 2 stand-alone hotel units interior to the existing site with the specific locations to be determined at a later date. HPB Staff Report Sundy Inn - Site Plan Page 3 SITE PLAN : MODIFICATLON ANALYSIkS COMPLIANCE WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS The body taking final action on the site and development application/request shall specifically address items identified in the Land Development Regulations. LDR Section 4.3.4(K)(Development Standards Matrix): Building Height Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K) (Development Matrix), within the OSSHAD zone district, the maximum building height is 35'. Building E is 34' in height, with the ground floor being the parking area and the second and third floors consisting of guest suites. Open Space Pursuant to Section 4.3.4(K), 25% of non-vehicular open space is required. The development proposal provides for 40% open space, which exceeds the requirement. Building Setbacks Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), the setback requirements within the OSSHAD zoning district are 25' front, 15' side (street), 7.5' side (interior) and 10' rear. Building E complies with the required setbacks. In addition, the 5 proposed bungalows and greenhouse also comply with the required setbacks as they are interior to the site. LDR Section 4.3.3(X)Residential Inns: Residential type inns shall be subject to the following provisions, limitations, and restrictions: 1) The use must be located with frontage on, or access from, at least one arterial or collector street as delineated on the City's Transportation Element; 2) The use must be located in proximity to office, industrial, or commercial uses; Positive findings with respect to the above requirements were previously made with the Conditional Use approval in 1998. The proposed use has frontage on Swinton Avenue, which is a City collector and is delineated as such in the City's Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed use is located within 600' of Atlantic Avenue and 300' of the City's Central Business District, which contain commercial and office type uses. 3) The minimum floor area per suite shall be 450 square feet; With the original Conditional Use approval, 40% of the units were to be suites. Of the 29 guest rooms that are included in the current proposal, 14 will be suites with square footage as follows: 2 @ 1,695 sq.ft.; 2 @ 675 sq.ft.; 8 @ 586 sq.ft.; and 2 @ HPB Staff Report Sundy Inn -Site Plan Page 4 560 sq.ft. The balance of the units (15 units) will be hotel rooms which require a minimum floor area of 325 sq.ft. [ref. LDR Section 4.3.3(M)(1)]. Based upon the above, 48% of the units will be suites. A condition of approval remains that the 40% of the guest units be suites. 4) Accessory uses may include: recreational facilities i.e. swimming pool, whirlpool, jacuzzi, steam room, tennis courts; meeting rooms; complimentary room service; and other nonresidential uses as permitted within the respective zoning district. The proposal includes a swimming pool, laundry facilities and a restaurant, which is permitted in the OSSHAD zoning district. 5) Parking shall be provided pursuant to Section 4.6.9(C)(7)(e). As the subject property is located within the OSSHAD, parking must be provided pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(4), which is discussed below. LDR Section 4.4.24 Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD): LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(4)(b) and (c) (Parking Requirements), states that restaurants shall provide six (6) spaces per one thousand square feet of total new or existing floor area being converted to restaurant use, residential type inns shall provide one (1) parking space for each guest room/unit, and any other nonresidential floor area requires one (1) space per every 300 sq. ft. Based upon the above the 8,115 sq.ft. of restaurant area requires 49 spaces, the proposed 29 guest rooms require 29 parking spaces (1 space per guest room), and the 300 sq.ft. greenhouse requires 1 parking space, for a total of 79 parking spaces. The proposal provides 63 on-site spaces. As the required parking has not been met, the proposal includes execution of an off-site parking agreement with the property at the southeast corner of S. Swinton Avenue and SE 1st Street (currently under same ownership), to utilize 16 spaces of a proposed 20 space parking lot. Execution of the off-site parking agreement is attached as a condition of approval. Handicapped Accessible Parking Pursuant to the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, three handicapped accessible parking spaces are required and currently only two are located on the site. An additional handicap accessible space can be accommodated by converting the existing standard space at the drop-off area. This item has been attached as a condition of approval. HPB Staff Report Sundy Inn - Site Plan Page 5 LDR Section 4.4.24(H) (OSSHAD - Special District Regulations): Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(H)(3), residential type inns shall create a transitional or buffer area between residential uses and nonresidential uses (such as office, commercial, etc.) which are either on or near the subject property. Utilizing the existing site design, the leasable units will be oriented so that they create a buffer between the residential properties to the west and the restaurant at the northeast corner of the site. With regard to the residences to the north and east, they are located within the OSSHAD, which promotes mixed uses. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(H)(4), a residential inn shall be associated with an historic structure and must be residential in design, scale and character. The existing structures at the northwest corner of the site are historically significant. The proposed structures south and east of the existing structures are to have the same residential design, scale and character. Declaration of Unity of Title: The development proposal incorporates Lot 11 and includes improvements across property lines. As the properties will be under one ownership and function as one development, it is appropriate to combine the properties through a Declaration of Unity of Title, which must be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit. This item has been attached as a condition of approval. Engineering Technical Comments: 1. Provide exfiltration trench results and drainage calculations. 2. Provide cleanout at easement line on sanitary service at southern property line. Indicate sanitary sewer service to buildings M and F. 3. Provide standard city parking stall detail and indicated location of all onsite handicap parking stalls. LANDSCAPE PLAN : ANALYSIS The proposed landscaping associated with Building E and the five bungalows will compliment the existing landscaping which was previously approved with the original site plan. The landscaping along the south and east sides of the proposed 3-story building will consist of palms, bamboos and specimen landscape materials which will soften the façade. The landscape plan incorporates the required variety of plant species and xeriscape principles, which complies with the landscape code and will be consistent with the previously approved site plan of record. As the details of the layout and materials are not known, a condition of approval is that an as-built landscape plan HPB Staff Report Sundy Inn - Site Plan Page 6 shall be submitted prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the 10-unit guest building. DESIGN ELEMENTS; A N'A L Y SIrS With its roofline, colonnades, second floor balcony, arches, columns, and wood grilles, this building has a British Colonial/Bahamian feeling to its style and elements. British Colonial is an appropriate stylistic companion for the vernacular and Queen Anne structures of the Sundy Inn complex. The exterior walls are a combination of medium textured stucco and horizontal Hardiboard. The Hardiboard is employed on the second floor. The roof, with exposed rafter tails on all elevations, will be copper standing seam with a verdigris finish. Windows and doors are mahogany, with the exception of aluminum louvers where indicated on the plan. The applicant will return for approval of paint colors, and details of railings, grilles and wood columns. Front elevation: The first floor of the front (north facing the garden) elevation of the building is colonnaded with a roofed balcony above the colonnade. The center entrance projects approximately 13 feet to the north and is covered by a hipped roof. Stucco columns support the projection with secondary stucco columns and a flattened arch behind. The east and west corners of the colonnade and balcony project approximately 11 feet to the north of the façade. These projections serve as an interesting break to the plane of the front façade. With the exception of the center columns, which are stucco, the balcony roof support columns are of wood as are the railings. A decorative wood grille is mounted between the first floor columns to further heighten the effect of a veranda. All of the doors of the first floor are French with two lites. The doors on the second floor are sliding and have full lites. Rear elevation: The stairwell and elevators are located in the projections at the southeast and southwest corners of the rear elevation (south, facing St. Paul's church parking lot). Stucco columns with arches in-between support the second floor walkway. The walkway on the first and second floor will be glass enclosed. Aluminum Bahama shutters will cover the upper half of the glass and decorative lattice panels, to filter the south light, will be installed below the shutters. Three aluminum louvered panels will be installed in each stairwell tower. The stucco wall enclosing the property will have decorative wood lattice insets to match those existing on the north property wall. HPB Staff Report Sundy Inn -Site Plan Page 7 East elevation: The east elevation has a covered walkway on the first floor, which leads from the rear stairs to the garden. The roof of the walkway is standing seam with exposed rafter tails and is supported by stucco columns. Decorative wood grilles are used as a balustrade between the columns. Based on the proposed floor plan of the guestrooms, it would be difficult, if not inappropriate, to install windows on the east and west elevations. To alleviate the blank wall of the west second floor elevation the architect has added wood trimmed aluminum louvered panels. Staff suggests that this same treatment would benefit the east elevation. West elevation: The west elevation (SW 1st Avenue) is the entrance to the lower level garage. The entrance to the garage is through decorative metal automatic gates to match the existing gates to the north. The site wall will have wood lattice insets to match existing. Three aluminum louvered panels with wood trim will be installed on the second floor and two will be installed in the stairwell. Staff recommends that some form of applied molding or pilasters be employed on the first floor to relieve the blank wall above the garage opening. REQUIRED` FINDINGS ' Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body, which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to consistency with the Future Land Use Map, Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency, and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations. The proposal expands the use onto the parcel south of the existing restaurant which was excluded from the original conditional use approval as well as modifications to the approved quest buildings. The residential-type inn component is a two-phased project involving the installation of an additional six guest units (29 total). Twenty-two units are included in Phase I, and another seven will be added in Phase II. With the Conditional Use modification approval of October 5, 1999 to expand onto Lot 11 and increase the number of units from 23 to 29, positive findings were made with respect to Future Land Use Map Consistency, Concurrency, and Comprehensive Plan Consistency. However, the following has been provided for informational purposes. HPB Staff Report Sundy Inn -Site Plan Page 8 Section 3.1.1(A) - Future Land Use Map: The subject property has a Mixed Use Future Land Use Map designation and an OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) zoning designation. The OSSHAD zoning district is consistent with the Mixed Use FLUM designation. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(D)(3), within the OSSHAD, outdoor dining which operates at night or which is the principal use or purpose of the associated restaurant is allowed as a conditional use. Also, LDR Section 4.4.24(D)(6) states that residential type inns not to exceed more than 18 individually leased suites or rooms per acre, is allowed as a conditional use. The site contains a total of 2.12 acres and the proposal will provide a total of 29 guest units, which represents a density of 13.67 units per acre. Based upon the above, a positive finding with respect to consistency with the Future Land Use Map can be made. Section 3.1.1(B) - Concurrency: As described in Appendix A, a positive finding of concurrency can be made as it relates to water, sewer, streets and traffic, drainage, parks and recreation, open space, and solid waste. Section 3.1.1 (C) - Consistency (Standards for Site Plan Actions): As described in Appendix B, a positive finding of consistency can be made as it relates to Standards for Site Plan Actions. Section 3.1.1 (D) - Compliance With the Land Development Regulations: As described under the Site Plan Analysis of this report, a positive finding of compliance with the LDR's can be made, provided the conditions of approval are addressed. Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Site Plan Findings): Pursuant to Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Findings), in addition to provisions of Chapter Three, the approving body must make a finding that the development of the property pursuant to the site plan will be harmonious with the adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole, so as not to cause substantial depreciation of property values. The subject property is surrounded by the following zoning districts: to the north and east is zoned OSSHAD; to the south is zoned CF (Community Facilities); to the west is zoned CF and RM (Medium Density Residential). The surrounding land uses are: to the north and east are single family residences; to the south is St. Paul's Episcopal Church; and, to the west are single family residences, duplexes, a community residential home (The Lighthouse), and vacant land. HPB Staff Report Sundy Inn - Site Plan Page 9 Compatibility of the proposed residential type inn with the proposed adjacent properties is not a major concern. The proposed 3-story 10-unit structure will be located at the south end of the property will have ground level parking with an overall height of 34'. To the south is the St. Paul's Episcopal Church parking lot which has existing landscaping. Extensive landscaping is also proposed as part of this development, which will soften the elevations for the three story structure. The proposed use will help fulfill the need for accommodations for tourists within close proximity to the City's central business district. This proposal will significantly upgrade one of the City's most historically significant structures/property and will help stabilize the surrounding neighborhood. The upgrading of the site will enhance rather than depreciate property values in the area, and may be an inducement for the upgrading of nearby properties. The proposal retains the residential character that is sought with developments within the OSSHAD zone district. As the intent of the OSSHAD zone district is to promote mixed uses, a positive finding of compatibility can be made. REVIEW BY OTHE>RS The development is not within a geographical area requiring review by the DDA (Downtown Development Authority). Community Redevelopment Agency: At its meeting of September 2, 1999, the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) reviewed and recommended approval of the conditional use request. Courtesy and Neighborhood Notices: A courtesy notice has been provided to the Old School Square Homeowner's Association. Letters of support and objection, if any, will be presented at the HPB meeting. ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION Phase I of the development proposal involves the replacement of the proposed 23- space asphalt parking lot at the south end of the site with a 3-story 10-guest room structure, Building E with a 15 space subgrade parking area. Also included in Phase 1 is the execution of an off-site parking agreement to utilize 16 spaces of the 20-space parking lot proposed at the southeast corner of S. Swinton Avenue and SE 1st Street. Phase II includes construction of five (5) 400 sq. ft. hotel rooms in separate buildings/bungalows and a 300 sq. ft. greenhouse on the expanded portion of the site (design elements are to be presented to the Board at a later date). The proposal will be consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan and Chapter 3 of the Land Development Regulations. There must be a minimum 40% of the guest rooms designed as suites. The proposed use will help fulfill the need for accommodations for tourists within close proximity to the City's central business district. The proposal will HPB Staff Report Sundy Inn - Site Plan Page 10 enhance property values in the area, and may be an inducement for the upgrading of nearby properties. A`L'TERN'ATI:VE `a:A Cr;T;ION`S 1. Continue with direction. 2. Approve COA-334 and the associated site plan, landscape plan and design elements for Sundy Inn, subject to conditions. 3. Deny approval of COA-334 and the associated site plan, landscape plan and design elements for Sundy Inn with basis stated. RECO"MM'ENDEDti A.:CTIONr. . A. Site Plan: Approve COA-334 for the site plan for Sundy Inn, based upon positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards) of the Land Development Regulations, policies of the Comprehensive Plan and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) subject to the following conditions: 1. That revised plans be submitted addressing Engineering Technical Items of the Staff Report; 2. That at least 40% of the guest units be suites; 3. That prior to issuance of a building permit, a Declaration of Unity of Title combining Lot 11, Block 62, Town of Linton, with the balance of the Sundy Inn properties be recorded; 4. That prior to issuance of a building permit, an off-site parking agreement be executed to utilize 16 spaces of the 20-space parking lot on Lots 20- 22, Block 70, Town of Linton; and 5. That a handicapped accessible parking space be accommodated within the drop-off area on the east side of the property. B. Landscape Plan: Approve COA-334 for the landscape plan for Sundy Inn, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16, subject to the following condition: 1. Provide an as-built landscape plan prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the 10-unit guest building. HPB Staff Report Sundy Inn - Site Plan Page 11 C. Design Elements: Based upon positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(E) Development Standards, approve the design elements as presented, with the following conditions: 1. That three aluminum louvered panels with wood trim be applied to the second floor of the east elevation, and 2. That some form of applied molding or pilasters be applied to the first floor of the west elevation above the garage door opening. 3. That the applicant will return for approval of paint colors, and details of railings, grilles and wood columns. Attachments: • Site Plan • Landscape Plan • Elevations Report prepared by: Michelle Hoyland, Associate Planner HPB Staff Report Sundy Inn -Site Plan Page 12 APPENDIX A CONCURRENCY FINDINGS, Pursuant to Section 3.1.1(B)Concurrency as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs of the requested land use and/or development application will not exceed the ability of the City to fund and provide, or to require the provision of, needed capital improvements for the following areas: Water and Sewer: No preliminary water and sewer plans have been submitted, however,the following is noted: ❑ Water service will be provided via service lateral connections to an existing 10"water main within Swinton Avenue and a proposed 8" main within SW 1st Avenue. The proposed eight-inch main is scheduled to be installed this fiscal year. Adequate fire suppression is provided via existing fire hydrants within the area (southeast corner of S. Swinton Avenue and SE 1st Street, northeast corner of SW 1st Avenue and SW 2nd Street, and northeast corner of SW 1st Street and SW 2nd Avenue.), and a proposed hydrant at the southeast corner of the development. ❑ Sewer service exists via service lateral connections to an existing 8" sanitary sewer main located on-site within the portion of the previously abandoned north/south alley. Pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan, treatment capacity is available at the City's Water Treatment Plant and the South Central County Waste Water Treatment Plant for the City at build-out. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to this level of service standard. Drainage: Preliminary paving and drainage plans have been submitted indicating that the drainage will be retained on site via an exfiltration system and landscaped areas. At this time, there are no problems anticipated complying with South Florida Water Management District or Lake Worth Drainage District requirements. Streets and Traffic: A traffic analysis has been prepared indicating that the increase from 23 to 29 units will generate 64 new trips per day. The subject property is located within the TCEA(Traffic Concurrency Exception Area),which encompasses the CBD (Central Business District), OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) and the West Atlantic Avenue Business Corridor. The TCEA exempts the above-described areas from complying with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. Based upon the above, a positive finding with respect to traffic concurrency can be made. Parks and Open Space: The 6 additional suites will not have a significant impact with respect to level of service standards for parks and recreation facilities. However, pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.2, whenever a development is proposed upon land which is not designated for park purposes in the Comprehensive Plan, an in-lieu fee of$500.00 per dwelling unit or hotel room shall be collected prior to issuance of building permits for each unit. Solid Waste: Trash generated each year by the 6 additional guest rooms (2,726 sq.ft. total) will generate 4.7 pounds per square foot per year or 6.4 tons per year. The trash generated by this proposal can be accommodated by existing facilities; therefore, a positive finding with respect to this level of service standard can be made. HPB Staff Report Sundy Inn - Site Plan Page 13 APPENDIX, STANDARDS. FOR SITE PLAN AC`T1ONS A. Building design, landscaping, and lighting (glare) shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent B. Separation of different forms of transportation shall be encouraged. This includes pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles in a manner consistent with policies found under Objectives D-1 and D-2 of the Transportation Element. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent C. Open space enhancements as described in Policies found under Objective B-1 of the Open Space and Recreation Element are appropriately addressed. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent D. The City shall evaluate the effect that any street widening or traffic circulation modification may have upon an existing neighborhood. If it is determined that the widening or modification will be detrimental and result in a degradation of the neighborhood, the project shall not be permitted. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent E. Development of vacant land, which is zoned for residential purposes, shall be planned in a manner, which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent HPB Staff Report Sundy Inn - Site Plan Page 14 F. Vacant property shall be developed in a manner so that the future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; complementary to adjacent land uses; and fulfills remaining land use needs. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent G. Redevelopment and the development of new land shall result in the provision of a variety of housing types which shall continue to accommodate the diverse makeup of the City's demographic profile, and meet the housing needs identified in the Housing Element. This shall be accomplished through the implementation of policies under Objective B-2 of the Housing Element. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent H. The City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent I. Development shall not be approved if traffic associated with such development would create a new high accident location, or exacerbate an existing situation causing it to become a high accident location, without such development taking actions to remedy the accident situation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent J. Tot lots and recreational areas, serving children from toddler to teens, shall be a feature of all new housing developments as part of the design to accommodate households having a range of ages. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential developments located in the downtown area, and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent I- - i; I • s 9L 7= r27 ZZ ,9-.GT «u� iYi •-ZSIT 11111251811156 e 7nn T ; 13IIIIIII ' _ �� „E N E... 7'i ... r•r. — i_I l_ (i. ` z � /�� -- I .. . s z NiF o z e h ii.,:,,,. E:,.: T:-\,N _ . ,4 R - ' '`'..,5,t- -, .7%04 0'. \:.; i .... ,,, .c:.e 6.,‘ X. . � � x �C4'r //III h'llIllI�� 'A Y -.7"4,747Z— r-r.-:: ily d./ La va''' .10 .—... \ 4 L 4 _0-9, „o-.at -, ,- /AtA N . rN:.: . 1 •`,� • O�, o,c. , I F cn I z" n .-�oo a nu• r _ �-,/,:ri , --. .... : n , 1 .. ....,..,, illi « M - ,2__L L � , H 11 o "RQ°'� ••." c :a' 11 • ;v'lY '144:�iiKl �� nn s = 1 lYM)(YN S W . .. - � ..5' .. NeF/a a I MZN r 3f1N3AV ls2l13 1S3M HlflOs t� v 35Y11d_0-.Z9IT 1 3701d DMIS%7 _0-.tZIT .0-.90f T 131'-T" — EXISTING SINGLE o STORY RESIDENCE s. Os — w 25.-0" (STORAGE) TOTA • C.L. N o \.. a . O1 LOT BLOCK 61 ^ U i Q 1 I PARKING: 42 SPACE`. lo 0I j P • 2 '-0" 16'-0" I' { 0 TYP J , �o ....... a 16.-0" t.1'E. ALLEY 19 / / i LOT 9 v n BLOCK 61 . a O m II 2176' J SOUTH WEST FIRST STREET ." • E PARKING AREA - NORTH LOT 0" OD • • IBALFOORT FINNVOLD ARCHITE( 255 NO DELRA' P 581.2 LICEN! Alt OVP.rt iR*1/[!dt NV a.3 IRO,. turoartr bull I.,m?2■ SOUTH WEST FIRST STREET " "I21"` OOUM C 0 CO»R%N1 rlbtlLRt tut O1RP1 J ci if1�=�'�f�r�f`11 If n ss tf A'VP,' tf r s f f ,f rq?"#:21:r '14 qMq11 ft t•lft'r M {� i tr. . ;tr fF1f r f,� � '1,rr •f1 I4135'-11' —4 J i'4 I �{ a411.1 l i • z /° Met iai,:4 b. LLa t r f• .. W I • ® 41. > I o � o _ , Z i Q ` I1E•-0- I 21'-0A .C?31.N0 sTRUCp.1: _,{i • 15.-°. } TO RDIAN 1— Z I LOT 20 I I LOT 21 �� I LOT 22 BLOCK 70 \ BLOCK 704 BLOCK 70 I 2 3 k 2. o144 1n I —1 [.. ; II 1 iii o o;, I I i I, ® t{F; �q ' rn i r Wa I"I'ti€' 21 Ii I , 333•-0- I w CENTERLINE OF `- S. SWINTON AVE _..�, ' SOUTHV DEL F SITE PARKING AREA — EAST LOT - 1" = 20'—O" . . . . . .., . . . . • •• . • - . . .. . . . . .... ... • • .• . — .. • . . .. ...- • ..... r"---\ UTILITY/STORAGE ROOM 1-. _. . ,1 --:.4C.•1,..4 4.""• .g r 1 1 I t 1 t I 1 t I I I t___/ .•.•. E ..,:. i, 5.4 ‘..2 1 1 . 5'-o- 1V-0" / 9 , .. I - I 41.-13- <-1 93*-0. AK — 19 -.0 h 95.-2. .., ,...6" 18*-2- 19.-0- 1W-0. 19 19: 0" .-0. ••••• ..• 1(4.0..s. FM, Cup..p.-1‘. I ill ,111 Awoie,P-,e 9-0. ---..----:-.."- •'':'5 ..*:: :- —... :: y.‘:-".. a.i ,•••1%-0- ,I..--0- 9-0' .', ri • ,- // / // • ' • ••: • 12-6" • Ai: 7 MECH. " 6 , : --,I I. ELEV. I -• : , .... ,•. . : . 1.)==:. IN/11,1111.1),... I I / . I I / • STORAGE , , • _ ,- • '' • • •• ..-. . \G?.....__..._ ,,---•---- PROPERTY LINE GROUND FLOOR - PARKING PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = CD " • 5:."..,111 I N.IF.it I i'l RS i '..:.•I I'''''.F.F.I . .- ....._... - .....-.. _-_-_-. _... , .. .... -•- ----- ..._,..,, ' • '/''. I -i.I1 7i'ii''I1 lbI"tt1r•,f'1IIyI1.It 11IIrt I Ii7 o••;&.1 1.,1.../,it.It_l 0..I. .I.•r•rr.r••‘. •'p'... -.'/-/-21‹..,• ','.',•_'_,(.\,...;..;:__?..__,l,'_-:_;.':.,..-..-..',;..'.<',?,'•,-:,„4..;4-.,.;,.",_,/ :(9.',S',,/1„4,7,,'•,4,/*/,,?,.1;.1:./•',.,.1/')"'".1/7,:j4.—,n/.../../'':::.:;x'.';,;•";/v:,/'":,.,:..,-./,'.—:.':;,,7"r-,-j.,..r./'.c C..7.,7›,f,.--.')t,ir 4 IL,2.7_1__•_'1•A_T'./l---l/ IJ/_I.II:-J1.1:•,1-.4 -1--1rL.1--5y-:zI,i,f-'i,''f•7 7,E•l---F / / 1 I I __\. — 2_t9.17 ,1-g-,..-14.-•113.•7..,'•1,''-.../2.,/-.1/.5:1 \i,1V•/.,.1..E.i i Hffl4g\qtl1.I\ry•;,1t11 hiTl-Fiil 11l IA 4i1.l lR•W4Ii0d1,n.I11;-liIII q,lii,'Fi,Pii11iE I!:lO,tl.1 iiiI1:i 111g - \ t " 1M? t • \_ _ --1% 7I - ,/ / / ' / i,1t:-i.i11.ViL,id4'A:-i,1I•'i11'1.r•,-tT,11t'Ai,'',!rI i,'''i, \ 3;ti;.I!•.i,,A' •ii:t,I:sr',- \,. •.‘N 1II .•.. 'I 1 I iiii 11.1 i ;1 - ---- i I %:'''''.2'/,'/ "...,%7 •//..• .71 \;;; q) -_, / ••• -V, /%//////„.:.. N. .i I ' I IIIIIII> Y/'• // ///!•!• \ • III •. • ,1: tfi „ ..„1. \ 1 1 • Id-) \ 4 //, , ', /•• ,'-:,', ,1 11 , it I rtt i ..:7• 142k., _..-//•'/V / / • -/".•.:-. Ilill. 1 I ._, ii: /,/,,,/ i://,c......;,,,/,/,/, . -..;!..____:_,•:-..,•„,X,4..,:/..x;,/,/;:,.',;' .-,,,,,.::: ,./,./.. , .:,<,:::./..;. , z ) . ' ill 1- , // X(-444/ ;,<<"4;'• -"4,/ ,, ,,/'/%,'/'//'/ //,/' -c '';0/y1 ' . •.; 11; irk I //•• ' V,/.,, .:///,;.: /).•_, N. (t) / / // / %7,///./--/ ./././, fi/,'.•;•.7/:',,,/••• qf, f• i i i C1/4 . ' 2 :1 Iil I C),Ar ,/'/• / 1/%///////'-r „/,/, ,,,11,1,,d II!' i '>l• ' 11 ',: * . -.1: .' 1,11; Pqtrtt• 1.- 1- • AP 1.'''.1 • • ..' /.7 :. A `14Pb • ',114 • • n li _11,i.,IPI, (.) • '''-''. \\._____•_,,,,......"-- 0 .V' S•fr "--i ll) t.' -' 'C\-• --•--17.- -----..- ' —-(... ,: ..."'"... i ...••,,, ,I) 1 _ , ( ,, , t___________ ---. ---:-\ '6 ,,Z,V./ 1 7.1 1, , ' ',4,,iin,..4 <„,,, ,,t.,\ ;;;-;:s• A./,-;(- 4 „. ..,. ,v ....--, , \ \ •Ar sr_n .40. .,-, f ';) I//, . "gi.. • ;i-TEHT-- -- , . \ _ N..,,,,. ,*1 t - mti . . .., -;.• -.'..;:<,/,,f, -- 1 n -n: -... ___ ,keu rttA.> , ......../ 1-,-..,•. , \ - ''' ,'• , .,o• 44 .. .0 ,N, . \::: .,--- //// .K• --. ' -- _ • ..,,, • ,..,, i r.t...... — •-N.,,, "i ---.1.• -(-K.45-•‹ .. •• • - \\, •• ,,,, , , ( r,, \ ,, vit. — 1 1 1 „ ://,../._// ,z,; /4 : . „...,.. . \rInto.•;.--•-, ' \ • „ >.-'Z/ ...„...."0,4', o ,./..-0 . 4 . • Tirar[ -- —/-„/wr, K. , • >------V/ / • \''• n 1 . • %Ft, \h ' /., / • ,.., . " ----- ,••• /. ',N.( --"---, ...- — ® , / ./•,, 1.1, , \ 111!- - fl ---- ". --- ... Mu.- I , , z, • • -------....,viNE.-.-s TO BE FLANTF,P AT A Ntit-1. c.,--- _ ., I / I -7.... — ..---..."--Ml.lie-- '....-1.—'.. '-''''.— I IV ',,,, 10. O.C. ON TV-P--- OUTSIDE Ot7 I LIE WAL L. . 4..\ . ri!cpt rig ---....• • , __ L — , • T, - .-- nfonn - Iv mii,..,"-_____ _.. ,.. _y, 1, .".--..,__, Lt....1. i__,AE:Nt5L-_.-isi4c...-:::: FL7,E T4T,---.4..E.:....._.,:;ogliNiLTL,...:::i:si.E7-ii1-1_ Uz....2.1x11-,145TTiLINF3E.." C.--GC.:ANRDTINE'Jl,ITION C:= TUE. -rti x . P' ;s} ... .. .i. • N _ - — -- - 1 le• q 1.11 Yif* C 1 _.). I Ki. -41 migi- • _,_, ,, I P' III_ir,/Elk. :.,,,,,1 • . 1 1 . „:;:x, ,1/,‘.I 11a4,,, 1.1 ,r11 1/,11,a,e,::.,,f,,,....,;*-11,11 ! . • t5.7.1•"„. •,,, 7.__.,,,_ r.:51,r2 '""- • \ -- 98'-10' 1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN BUILDING E (.11:1) SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 \ 4 1061 ■ DAURDRAIL 0 42'A.F.F. . DE ■ BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY 1 BALCONY BALCONY _✓=_ =c_ Win_ TYPSUITE 6 SUITE 7 SUITE 8 HR. SUITE 9 SUITE 10 RATED PART. sa6 S.F. - 560 S.F. 586 S.F. 586 S.F. & DOORS ® 586 S.F. ED ECM CI DPNN ROOMS = o o — o o C— = O 0 mol . E7 O E= = EI o t 07. . 99-8' I 'I 7--,. 8'�: I B'-0' I 19-0 I8'-10' t%�3'-10' i ED 1,4 • dEk ,.30 r, ,,\ _ ' e �t , = 10 MI.../ r--.1 C ii 1---i _ _ ENCLOSED WALHWAY ]ED 0 TOP OF MT?,Al unnuuno 6•-4. ELEV. I"AT Y Y - i mnimnlmm� _.1 TP CARICC sr 98-10' r FIR: , . - rBALFOORT FINNVOLO AR. , . . . ....',.." -L_ 1-I '',• OPEN VERANDAH i, ...I .... 444 MM.. M_ -MI EML. MM... M • M. MIMI.,MM.. M____M. POMMI elf/tHINT KKA WM illr SUITE 1 SUITE 2 SUITE 3 SUITE 4 SUITE 5 560 S.F. 586 S.F. 586 S.F. 586 S.F. 586 S.F. . 0 QM ED Ell CI ED L-1 I-J L--- 1-1 L--- I 1.-J -1_1 1-3 I_/ L--- —1 L.--I 1_1 1 - 7 ,..,. ,... 1 9'-Orif th._,0. . 7 • . jelk inik 1=1 1 207 = I • W. InI4VI ,XI IIP S\\\ TYP. 1 HR. ••• 0 RATED PARTc? _. _- ,.. =:, - 4DOORS i I' : N ROOMS 1 3 0 G 0 -fsss _ . c...... EMI CEE14. .V. LID 41; IC) CD " , . ——limns .=— • di .Tire imm. 41111M ill'1111111111_—4` .c, - 7 7 ENCLOSED WALKWAY n immoommointnA/4 E ----", HANDRAIL 0 34-A.F.- TYPICAL d ,14 , HANDRAIL UT MEND 11 16 E ; 12-AT THE TOP AND . ,, 8DTIOLI or RUN. S..- V-e' I 6. TYPICAL ...-, I . b lehtitithontimo. .., ')K. E ignitIgkbb I-17 n. 8* I," 1 f 90-10* f I FIRST FLOOR PLAN BUILDING E (-,r3 SCALE: 1/8" , • ift , • , • ,•,' •J' r- -----___ —.---- -1 • • • STANDING SEAII METAL ROOF, TYPICAL , ' Il \38.-11' # / 12 -vRIDGE • '--16 I , 1 iilliliminill 0 AI 34'9' 4 1.1- I ip i3 ...Jr, MEAN kOOF HEIGHT � 29'-1' sillil�� �� ...MO MIMI 1111 EAVES : 1-1! .=----—.—I I , =------ ..n . , 41 '• I • I -Tt _ _ _ = ' TOP OF GUARDRAIL ATi -_i ; 3 rI : Lb1 _ 11 -i im SECOND FLOOR - CONC. SLAB l-9 rw .>nr IIIf u.v.- 'wn t n ca svu oa ! W !S ug —I lit „.. 41 , _ , -- [-- ---- L ' . - ... .... - ---- ` FIRST FLOOR - CONC. SLAB NORTH ELEVATION 1 SCALE. 1/B' = 1'-0' AI,00 a ® c -s i I r- ' ixssm • r' ASSos:AA a C fi-»m-CAir` in- .. _ Fs=u n .s 5 v —_ • �n ll in3 'n. ern : i - - 'r®---------- `i�Efi ;tc l A1 4f .- F. aa 1 E: f7 �! i _ _ __ , __— _ �_3. uE17Ali1 STUCCO MBA {LLAI-colc SLAB uEOtNa STUCCO IINISH _� = _ uEpIM STUCCO . fib wg;'. rrtc' fir .1y 1 ;i iE1: it `IMivitifli •.,f L, ��#1 '{E:i.., lilt. . _______ ___ gg--�pp rT � ib1IRi bi-CDC.SLAB I I r I let ® ® STUCCO SITE VALL TYPICALO MA Ell TO EXIST. SOUTH ELEVATION 2 II.SCALE.I/B'•1'-0' t 11, R r RIDGE t 33'-6' 12 j6 34'-0' o_ G t2 _ MEAN ROOFI=IGHT _ 31'-8.' 1 1 l'I'' I 1 LAVES 1--I I`f'-'------1---r-'1 7 i 7�1 t��Iq� Jr 129'-1' ...._.. __�� _._.— = __._. _._ r� EAVES j HARDI BOARD SIDING I o a y�� tt _:. _.. _ ` ___ � m 20'-3' ,s lc ( i 'T� SECOND FLOOR — CUNC. SJ - "- l IT 'l u i - - T +- i I t�� �� Y SECOND FLOOR - CONC. SLAB SECOND 1 MEDIUM STUCCO FINISH - �, ,a, xr -t--- i icil9iiita Ei�3i�i Vr `rt tti��F°3; 1 it�it° o�c�pp gEiie.i Epmi E i' t i iF .„7,r1 F t,. u.;t1 .. 6 t7l t t iat MEI. 1.4... FIRST FLOOR - CIIX:L.--gLA ^'1 t IRST FLOOR - CONC. SLAB FIRST \�%J, StIe/ STUCCO SITE �..i ��ei %i.\ IP'..\. WALL TYPICAL /i.0 ii4� TO MATCH EXIST. . ST LEVEL) V GARAGE FINISHED FLOOR (HIGH POINT) EAST ELEVATION 3 AI.OU SCALE' 1/8' = I'-0' 1 � • 12 .�✓�� 32'-5'h 3E RIDGE' • -- 29'-1' 1_ �- 1 • :-:ui r-.-T� Vl�► 1 -r-� EAVES :. u 1 - 1 —�=_ _ ._ - -`._._= ;.. • • -...�...__-... _ 11311- 19'-3' pi -NARDL.HOARI S1D111IG �_ - SECOND FLOOR - LUNC, A t•' i C MEDIUM STUCCO FINISH an t� 3 ! MEDIUM Sl'UCCO FINISH 7 m FIRST FLOOR - C[ING.-SL•LABAD ---• _ �L I % i SITE WALL TYPICAL SITE VALL TYPICAL AUTOMATIC DECORATIVE SLIDING GATES • POINT) WEST ELEVATION 4 SCALE' 1/8' = 1'-0' ALUU ______ _ . . . __. . _ r_____ _ CITY j < Li Hi-I L ..� w I z < r < /lill ' < _ -- N.W. 1ST ST. I N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. 1S7 ST. - o 0. _ w z In N cs'z "' N COMMJIJI T Y D • CENTER Z °IF Wi TENNIS � OLD ' • —11 zI STADIUM Z Q SCHOOL Li LiJ I SQUARE ' z Z ATLANTIC AVENUE II POLICE SOUTH I ' — COMPLEX COUNTY COURT 1.1 Ill HOUSE ; il I t —< 1 ill w< < — • iiiiiM S.W. 1ST ST. S.W. 1ST ST. S.E. 1ST ST. i > aninga G N giiiiiiiligig N W N - O _ O N - - .n _ M h S.W. 2ND ST. S.E. 2ND ST. ZI I / 1 1 1 I CD I I/I-- I N I Z I I >1 I I V) Li I Li cri 3 v vi vi l vi vi vi I S.W. 3RD ST. S.E. 3RD ST. ` S.E. 3RD ST. 0 MERRI TT z II N y_._ PARK • i MI . I cn N . -,mmk- SUNDY ESTATES CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT I -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM.377 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD UITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: November 3, 1999 • AGENDA ITEM: III.B. ITEM: Class V Site Plan Modification for the Conversion of the existing Antique Store (f.k.a. Beaudacious) and Construction of a One and Two-Story Mixed Use Building (Office/Residential), located at 125 N. Swinton Avenue. N.E. 51H ST TRINITY I ll 1 .---- LUTHERAN 1 LAKE IDA ROAD N.E. 4TH 5T, 'J CASON — METHODIST CHURCH GENERAL DATA: Owner James & Carol Carr =< Agent Silberstein Architects — - - N.R. 3RD ST. N.E. 3RD Si. International — — Applicant David Felger W I [ration East side of Swinton Avenue, 7 one-half block in between N.E. CITY w 1st Street and N.E. 2nd Street. _-" BUILDING > Property Size 0.23 Acre I ` I1 Future Land Use Map Other Mixed Use N R 2ND_ Si. K.E. 2ND ST. Current Zoning OSSHAD (Old School Square — Historic Arts District) IMM Adjacent Zoning North: OSSHAD East: OSSHAD — HALL South: OSSHAD — Z West: OSSHAD I N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST Si. Existing Land Use Antique store °COMMUNITY — Proposed Land Use Conversion of the existing CENTER Z antique store into a one and — two-story building (8 offices TENNIS In _ on the ground floor/2- STADIUM bedroom residence on the ATLANTIC AVENUE second floor), with associated < I I < I < <C parking and landscaping. I Water Service Existing on site. - . Sewer Service Existing on site. I -�— S.W. 1ST ST. S.E. 1ST T. . N I I [ I H _ Ilml N ,, �- J_ _ I w_ 1 1 ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is that of approval of COA-396 which incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for Zodiac Building, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F): D Site Plan Modification (Class V); ❑ Building Elevations; ❑ Landscape Plan; and, ❑ Waiver to the following requirement: LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d) — A request to reduce the perimeter landscape strip from 5' to 2'. The subject property is located at 125 N. Swinton Avenue on the east side of Swinton Avenue just north of NE 1st Street, within the OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) zoning district. BACKGROUND The subject property consists of Lot 4, less the south 1.0' thereof, Block 67, Town of Linton and contains approximately 0.23 acres. City building records indicate that the existing structure was constructed in 1925. However, on closer inspection the structure appears to be of earlier construction. It is possible that this was one of the houses that was relocated from Atlantic Avenue at the time of the Florida Land Boom when the Avenue was becoming more commercial. It is single story, vernacular in style, and wood frame construction on a pier foundation. The house was originally single family and was converted to a duplex in the 1940's. In 1996 the structure was reverted back to single family. A Certificate of Appropriateness with an associated site plan application was approved on April 1, 1996 by the Historic Preservation Board to allow the conversion of the single-family residence to an antique store. Since said approval, the building has been utilized as an antique store. The request now before the Board is approval to allow a two-story 2,302 sq. ft. addition to the existing 1,013 sq. ft. structure for a total square footage of 3,315 sq. ft. The proposal incorporates a mixed-use of professional offices and a two-bedroom apartment. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The development proposal involves the following: o Construction of a 2,302 sq. ft. building addition for the use of professional offices on the first floor (2,405 sq. ft.) and a two-bedroom apartment on the second floor (910 sq. ft.); HPB Staff Report Zodiac Building—Site Plan and COA Page 2 o Installation of 7 parking spaces (5 standard, 1 compact and 1 handicapped accessible) within a proposed parking area, backing out onto the alley, on the east side of the property; o Installation of landscaping, walkways and a refuse container area; o Installation of a picket fence on the south property line; and o Installation of lighting fixtures. The proposal also involves a waiver request to allow the reduction of the required 5' wide perimeter landscape buffer to 2' on the north and south sides of the property adjacent to the proposed parking area [4.6.16(H)(3)(d)]. SITE PLAN' MODIFICATION ANALYSIS COMPLIANCE COMPLIANCE WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS The body taking final action on the site and development application/request shall specifically address items identified in the Land Development Regulations. Setbacks: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), the required building setbacks for the OSSHAD zoning district are: 25' front, 7'6" side-interior and 10' rear. The proposed front setback is 30'1", side setback is 7'6" and the rear setback is 35'7". Thus, the proposal complies with applicable setback requirements. Building Height Within the OSSHAD zoning district a maximum building height of 35' is permitted and the proposed structure will have a height of 24'. Open Space: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), 25% non-vehicular open space is required within the OSSHAD zoning district. The proposal exceeds the requirement with 47.4% open space. Parking Requirements: Pursuant to Section 4.4.24(G)(4)(a), within the OSSHAD zoning district, business and professional offices shall provide 1 parking space for 300 sq.ft. of total new or existing floor area being converted to non-residential use. This requirement may be reduced to one parking space per 400 sq. ft. of total floor area, or by at least one space, where there is a mix of residential and non-residential use in the same structure. In addition, pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(6), when parking requirements are applied to new development or a change in use, said parking requirements shall be reduced by one parking space. The proposal incorporates a mixed-use of professional offices and a two-bedroom apartment. Based upon the above, the 2,302 sq. ft. addition to the existing 1,013 sq. ft. structure for a total square footage of 3,315 sq. ft will require nine parking spaces. This reduction may only occur once. Based upon this code section, 8 HPB Staff Report Zodiac Building—Site Plan and COA Page 3 parking spaces are required for this development. Further, within the OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) zone district, when it is impossible or inappropriate to provide the required parking on-site, the parking requirement may be met by providing either off-site parking or an in-lieu parking fee of$6,000 a space to utilize City parking spaces. As only 7 spaces can be located on the site, the proposal includes purchasing one parking space. Bike Rack: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(C)(1)(c)(3), bicycle parking facilities shall be provided by a fixed or stationary bike rack for any non-residential use within the City's TCEA. The subject property is located within the TCEA area, and a bike rack has not been provided for each lot. Therefore, this requirement has been attached as a condition of approval. Site Lighting: Pursuant to LDR 4.6.8 (Lighting), lighting is required for new development proposals. A site lighting and photometrics plan must be provided to ensure compliance with LDR Section 4.6.8 and is attached as a condition of approval. Sidewalks: Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.3(B)(1), a 5' wide sidewalk is required within the rights-of- way adjacent to the property. A 6' sidewalk currently exists along Swinton Avenue adjacent to the front of the property. In addition, the proposal includes a pedestrian connection to the existing Swinton Avenue sidewalk. Proposed Apartment: The addition includes a second story apartment that is 910 square feet in size. The LDRs require a minimum of 900 square feet for a two-bedroom apartment, thus this requirement is met. However, staff has serious concerns regarding the functionality of this space as a dwelling unit. The original proposal for this property included office space on the second story, with no residential component. During the preliminary review process, the applicant was informed of the need to provide an elevator for access to the second story offices. Additionally, the parking requirement for an office project is calculated at one space per 300 square feet. The applicant subsequently learned that if a residential component was included an elevator would not be necessary, and the parking could be calculated at one space per 400 square feet, or a total of 8 spaces as opposed to 11. Thus, the present mixed use plan was submitted for review. In viewing the floor plan of the apartment, it appears that it will function as additional office space, or perhaps a conference room and break area for employees. There is no separate exterior access and no physical separation between the upper and lower floors (such as a door that can be closed). Thus no privacy is provided that would be typical of a separate dwelling unit. There are no closets for clothing or storage, and no dining area. It is staffs position that while this area may be identified as a dwelling unit on the HPB Staff Report Zodiac Building—Site Plan and COA Page 4 plans, in reality the space will simply be an extension of the office area. Unless it is significantly redesigned to more closely approximate a functional dwelling unit, staff recommends that the parking requirements be calculated at 1/300, and that an elevator be provided. LANDSCAPE PLAN ANALYSIS The landscape plan retains an existing large Banyan Tree on the west side of the property. Red Tip Cocoplum hedging exists on the north and south property lines, except adjacent to south side of the proposed parking area, where additional hedging will be installed. Along the north side of the property the proposed landscaping includes, a relocated Gumbo Limbo tree, three Live Oak trees (one relocated), a Citrus tree and a Tamarind tree. The landscaping along the south side of the property include four Tamarind trees (two relocated) and a Citrus tree. The foundation plantings on the east side (rear) of the structure include Thryallis and Bird of Paradise. Lady Palms, Philodendron Xanadu, Crinum Lily, Ti Plant, Oleander tree, Coconut Palm, Bird of Paradise, and Vareigated Arboricola are proposed for the west side (front) of the structure. Adjacent to the parking area, the requirement to provide a tree within the landscape island has been met via the existing trees on the abutting properties. The landscape plan must be revised to show existing landscaping abutting the parking area. WAIVER ANALYSIS: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d), a landscaped barrier shall be provided between the off-street parking area or other vehicular use area and abutting properties. The barrier shall be located between the common lot line and the off-street parking area or other vehicular use area in a planting strip of not less than five (5) feet in width. The request is to allow a reduction of the perimeter landscape strip from 5' to 2' adjacent to the north and south sides of the parking area. Required Findings: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the approving body shall make findings that the granting of the waiver: (a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; (b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; (c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; or, (d) Does not result in the granting of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. HPB Staff Report Zodiac Building—Site Plan and COA Page 5 The waiver will only apply to the perimeter landscape strip along the north and south sides of the parking area. A 2' perimeter landscape strip is proposed, rather than 5', so that a 7 space parking area can be accommodated. The waiver request will not adversely affect the neighboring area, diminish the provision of public facilities, nor create an unsafe situation. Granting the waiver will not result in a special privilege, as the same request would be granted under similar circumstances. Based upon the above, a waiver is recommended. DESIGN ELEMENTS ANALYSIS' The design elements of the addition are as follows: • The roof will be finished in dark blue composition shingles, with exposed rafter tails. The existing structure has a white shingle roof and will be re-roofed to match with dark blue. Please note the plans erroneously reflect a standing seam metal. • The horizontal siding will be Hardiboard. • All windows will be single hung sash factory finished white aluminum with applied muntins. • The French doors on the south elevation will be factory finished white aluminum with applied muntins. • The doors on the east and west elevations will be factory finished white aluminum with a single lite. The side lites around both doors will be white aluminum with applied muntins. • All windows and doors will utilize hurricane rated glass. • All shutters will be wood louvered and non-operable. • The entrance columns and cornice on the east elevation will be wood. • All of the door and window trims will be Hardiboard. • Wall mounted copper carriage type lanterns will flank the west entrance door. Given the scale and massing of the addition, staff has concerns with the ability of the project to comply with the LDR guidelines regarding compatibility and appropriateness as follows: LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(j): The size of a building, the building mass in relation open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, and porches shall be visually compatible with the building size and building mass of historic sites, buildings and structures within a historic district. HPB Staff Report Zodiac Building—Site Plan and COA Page 6 LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(k): A building shall be visually compatible with the buildings, structures and sites in its directional character, whether vertical, horizontal, or nondirectional. The Delray Beach Design Guidelines state that it is appropriate to locate the addition to the rear or an inconspicuous side and limiting the size and scale in relationship to the existing structure is essential. The addition appears to be out of scale with the existing structure, and is overly massive for its site on Swinton Avenue. If the Board agrees with staffs assessment, direction should be given to the applicant to reduce the overall square footage of the addition. Fence: A 3'4" white painted, cedar picket fence will be installed on either side of the walkway in the front yard. Refuse Containers/Air Conditioning Area: The proposal includes the installation of a trash/refuse container area and an A/C area to the south side of the proposed structure. The plans indicate that this area will be screened by Thryallis hedging on the east side only. However, the Thryallis hedge shall be installed on the south and west sides of the area also. This item has been attached a condition of approval. REQUIRED .:;FINDINGS' Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body, which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to consistency with the Future Land Use Map, Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency, and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations. Section 3.1.1(A) - Future Land Use Map: The subject property has a Future Land Use Map designation of OMU (Other Mixed Use) and a zoning designation of OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District). The OSSHAD zoning district is consistent with the OMU Future Land Use Map designation. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(B)(2), within the OSSHAD zoning district, Business and Professional offices are listed as a permitted use. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(C)(2), on a parcel that has as its principal use a non-residential use, there may be one single family residence, either within a separate structure or within a structure housing a non-residential use, provided that on of the situations exist: HPB Staff Report Zodiac Building—Site Plan and COA Page 7 • The residence is occupied by the owner, proprietor or employee of a business enterprise conducted on the property; or • The business is owned, or operated, by the owner of the parcel; or • The residence is occupied by the owner of the parcel. The applicant has indicated that the apartment will be occupied on an occasional basis by the business owner. Whether the space is used as office or as an owner's apartment, the use will comply with LDR Section 3.1.1(A), and it is appropriate to make a positive finding with respect to the Future Land Use Map. Section 3.1.1(B) - Concurrency: As described in Appendix A, a positive finding of concurrency can be made as it relates to water, sewer, streets and traffic, drainage, parks and recreation, open space, and solid waste. Section 3.1.1 (C) - Consistency (Standards for Site Plan Actions): As described in Appendix B, a positive finding of consistency can be made as it relates to Standards for Site Plan Actions. Section 3.1.1 (D) - Compliance With the Land Development Regulations: As described under the Site Plan Modification Analysis of this report, a positive finding of compliance with the LDR's can be made, provided the conditions of approval are addressed. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: A review of the goals, objectives and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan was conducted and no applicable goals, objectives or policies were found. Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Site Plan Findings): Pursuant to Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Findings), in addition to provisions of Chapter Three, the approving body must make a finding that the development of the property pursuant to the site plan will be compatible and harmonious with the adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole, so as not to cause substantial depreciation of property values. The subject property is bordered on the north, south, east and west by the OSSHAD zoning district. To the north is a single-family residence; south is a single-family residence; east is the Currie & Associates architectural office; and west is Nanny's Attic antique store. With the exception of Nanny's Attic on the west side of Swinton, these sites are developed with single story structures. The use of an office within the OSSHAD zoning district is a fairly low intensity type use, however, the proposed 2,302 sq. ft. office addition is not in keeping with the LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(8)(a)(j) or HPB Staff Report Zodiac Building—Site Plan and COA Page 8 4.5.1(E)(8)(a)(k) with regard to building mass and compatibility with the buildings, structures and sites in its directional character. The adjacent residential properties will be buffered by trees every 25' along with a hedge. The proposed business office use will be low intensity in nature however, the size, massing and compatibility with surrounding properties is inappropriate as stated above. Therefore a positive finding cannot be made with respect to compatibility to adjacent properties. REVIEW BY OTHERS Community Redevelopment Agency: At its meeting of October 14, 1999 the CRA (Community Redevelopment Agency) recommended approval of the development proposal. Parking Management Advisory Board: At its meeting of October 22, 1999, the Parking Management Advisory Board reviewed the in-lieu parking fee request for Zodiac Building, and recommended approval of the in- lieu fee for 1 parking space. Neighborhood Notice: Special Notice was provided to the Old School Square Homeowners association. Letters of objection, if any, will be presented at the HPB meeting. ASSESSMENT :AND CONCLUSIONS The development proposal involves the construction of a 2,302 sq. foot addition to the existing retail structure for office use (total square footage of 3,315). As previously stated, a positive finding with regard to LDR Section 2.4.5(F)(5), 4.5.1(E)(8)(j) & (k), as well as the Delray Beach Design Guidelines cannot be made. These sections directly relate to compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties, building massing, visual compatibility with buildings, structures and sites in its directional character and finally the size and scale in relationship to the existing structure. Therefore, staff recommends that the proposal be scaled back to meet these requirements. Additionally, staff has noted serious concerns about the functionality of the second story as a dwelling unit. It appears that the space will more likely be used for office purposes, which would require 11 parking spaces rather than 8 parking spaces. An elevator would also be required to meet minimum handicapped accessiblity requirements should the entire structure be utilized as professional offices. The entire second floor should be redesigned, or the plans modified to comply with the parking and access requirements. HPB Staff Report Zodiac Building—Site Plan and COA Page 9 ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Continue with direction. 2. Approve COA-396 and the associated waiver, site plan, landscape plan and design elements for Zodiac Building, subject to following conditions: that the thryallis hedge be installed on the south and west sides of the refuse/air conditioning area; that a photometrics plan be provided to ensure compliance with LDR Section 4.6.8; that a bike rack be provided on site; provide an updated traffic statement; that drainage calculations and exfiltration test results be submitted; that a fire hydrant be installed in the front of the property; and that an affidavit be provided from the property owner stating that the second floor will be utilized as an apartment only. 3. Deny approval of COA-396 and the associated site plan, landscape plan and design elements for Zodiac Building, with basis stated. RECOMMENDED ACTION Staffs position is that there are too many issues with the plans as proposed to take action at this time. Therefore, the recommendation is that the item be continued with direction. Attachments: ❑ Appendix A ❑ Appendix B ❑ Location Map ❑ Site Plan ❑ Floor Plan ❑ Elevations 0 Landscape Plan APPEN!D.IX .A CONCURRENCY FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1(B) Concurrency as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs of the requested land use and/or development application will not exceed the ability of the City to fund and provide, or to require the provision of, needed capital improvements for the following areas: Water and Sewer: ❑ Water service exists on site via a service lateral connection to a 10" main located in the N. Swinton Avenue right-of-way. ❑ Sewer service exists on site via a service lateral connection to an 8" main located in the north/south alleyway on the east side of the property. ❑ A fire hydrant is located at the southeast corner of N. Swinton Avenue and Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive (NE 2nd Street) approximately 225' north of the site. However, a fire hydrant must be installed in the front of the property. This item has been attached as a condition of approval. Pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan, treatment capacity is available at the City's Water Treatment Plant and the South Central County Waste Water Treatment Plant for the City at build-out. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to these level of service standards. Drainage: An engineering plan has been submitted indicating that drainage will be accommodated on-site via the installation of an exfiltration trench and associated drainage swale. At this time, there are no problems anticipated meeting South Florida Water Management District requirements. However, drainage calculations and exfiltration test results must be submitted. This item has been attached as a condition of approval. Streets and Traffic: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.3(E)(2), a traffic statement is required for land use applications, which generate 200 or less ADT (Average Daily Trips). A traffic statement has been submitted which indicates the 3,197 sq.ft addition of office and residence will generate 40 ADT. However, the square footage of the building is 3,315 sq. ft., a revised traffic statement must be provided which indicates the correct vehicle trips generated. This has been attached as a condition of approval. Parks and Open Space: Park dedication requirements do not apply for nonresidential uses i.e. office space. The proposed residential unit will not have a significant impact with respect to level of service standards for parks and recreation facilities. However, pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.2, whenever a development is proposed upon land which is not designated for park purposes in the Comprehensive Plan, an in-lieu fee of $500.00 per dwelling unit will be collected prior to issuance of building permits for each unit. Thus, an in-lieu fee of $500.00 will be required of this development. Solid Waste: The proposal calls for 2,415 sq.ft. of office space and one residential unit. Trash generated each year by the proposed office space is 6.52 tons of solid waste per year, and trash generated by the one unit is 1.99 tons of solid waste per year for a total generation of 8.51 tons of solid waste per year. The Solid Waste Authority has indicated that it has no objection to projects that generate less than 10 tons of solid waste per year. Therefore, a positive finding can be made to this Level of Service standard. A P`P E N'D IX. B: STANDARDS FOR SITE,: PLAN ACTIONS A. Building design, landscaping, and lighting (glare) shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent B. Separation of different forms of transportation shall be encouraged. This includes pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles in a manner consistent with policies found under Objectives D-1 and D-2 of the Transportation Element. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent C. Open space enhancements as described in Policies found under Objective B-1 of the Open Space and Recreation Element are appropriately addressed. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent D. The City shall evaluate the effect that any street widening or traffic circulation modification may have upon an existing neighborhood. If it is determined that the widening or modification will be detrimental and result in a degradation of the neighborhood, the project shall not be permitted. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent E. Development of vacant land, which is zoned for residential purposes, shall be planned in a manner, which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent F. Vacant property shall be developed in a manner so that the future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; complementary to adjacent land uses; and fulfills remaining land use needs. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent G. Redevelopment and the development of new land shall result in the provision of a variety of housing types which shall continue to accommodate the diverse makeup of the City's demographic profile, and meet the housing needs identified in the Housing Element. This shall be accomplished through the implementation of policies under Objective B-2 of the Housing Element. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent H. The City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent I. Development shall not be approved if traffic associated with such development would create a new high accident location, or exacerbate an existing situation causing it to become a high accident location, without such development taking actions to remedy the accident situation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent J. Tot lots and recreational areas, serving children from toddler to teens, shall be a feature of all new housing developments as part of the design to accommodate households having a range of ages. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential developments located in the downtown area, and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent • o TRINITY ! I 1 I 1 1 LL LAKE IDA ROAD N.E. S _ I — CASON — — 1 METHODIST — CHURCH — 1 CS 1 > 111 -_LU I > > < -Q I < < _ — ( . .., , N.W. 3RD ST. N.E. 3RD ST . > � - w n =< = W NM x CITY w %_ I. a ATTORNEY ] -—o o BUILDING Q z _La u_ cv MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. BLVD. N.E. 2ND ST I- U, 1 MI z f I N Z Q m _ CITY I '' ~ D HALL O Li w V) Z I ) N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST ST 3 Z Li Li r z z z O i COMMUNITY ~CENTER Z OLDSCHOOL —SQUARE TENNISSTADIUM i I I . I I m 1 I ATLANTIC AVENUE 1 Li SOUTH I IIIf i I I I 1 < <Li LIj < 1 'a < I I COUNTY o I I 1 1 1 r__c l i COURT N N ` N I e in HOUSE 5 's t.i w (i N (n !n 0 W W VI V1 I N --isma-- ZODIAC BUILDING PLANNING DEPARTMENT (f.k.a. Beaudacious Antique store) CITY OF DELRAY BEACH: FL J -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM030 • 11 IL •a r..s^„1 5 :Ilbs,N.ln Arch/touts PROTECT DATA lnf I.I,.I f a MB. IMF lA.,..L IN A A . A .,..,,m..,.ti elrna®. snrcl.. .+.r r.•an.w. - rams s...e.w.,..se.•a,•....mnaval"Inr osl rumm V1111 r.1.1 1.1.7.4101x rr •..<R. a,bat/ n- �.a� r. , 1.,-170•.,.1WIR.7.a11 M.,lC.1. .. .ma.m=rois�lIn.. n•11 I( IFV ®1R7.m.nmi.�.a s.marts.as.R ram0 VRa. :r sre If i+Mm0a�� ...•..�-. LOCATION UP N.T.S. m v�R 111 FT Me LOCATION MAP -in •A R. at•••. ar ROW. ��� .,. I,.1r i.1.ate ..m+.n .m.w.Ant 1 I ... ZODIAC BUILDING iiiNplimill.. � Yij .1.._._._._._._._._._._.. ._._._._._._._._._._._._._.-._._ It _ ..__._.r OELRAY BEACN.FL 111 S •T'• llIIIiIiII!It1 0 1/2 MILE VICINITY MAP • r�""" .`. ;-7i: : :? -,=r_=1_-� _ti-. _i1""'""':?> ::`: is 1M.n..n I M 1-11R lc M , linlnnl. ,_______Jr... 11,4,....,t I .. 1 woo mar Nam 1' j 1, .11 I I j n t ,,,_-ti-�:_-•.r 1 �-I •111 CM.Ma Palms I ,.._____. FIEVISKRIS: I r r -r } Tile: SITE PLAN SITE PLAN e ,,.... ,.-a" Dwg.no.: A-1 .0 Date:OCT. I1,199f • rr Tr-r r r $11b.M.ln Arthlt.o1 i1.41/1 r,11 I.,e Arc ii L.Yt,el...r,e@.N.,•. ,..1 U1.1r1•.111 Y r-r r-r r-r r-r r-r r s r-r i =::: o I i 3--• ft I-I offni 1� am =ill^l •I ZODIAC I BUILDING ,�r$ O HI i ' =illl II I� I r� I DELRAY BEACH,FL. Tf I IN■IMI II III bp • I_- alum I - O II •IMMO I•,moo -fin �I II sigh.„, � _ Y�111 -�I J . .^.• . -_-_-\" •-•. - 1 I 11 M.I 4:1:we I I i II E �' ■ ..e w .1 II !�� ' �■ I !• , •••.•/. i 051111111110; i i::fi:-° 8 ;1 i I i g i .„1 I a I I 1 I I i 1 I REVISIONS: � '_•_•_•_•_•_•_•_•_•_,r{_•_•_•-•-•-_-•-•-•� - 41—_.—_._._._._._._._Ir_r FLOOR PLANS VINTONn . 111. • 1 1 11 T e R 1 • •. Dwg.no.: • � A-2■0 FIRST FLOOR CD tier. 1•-0• SECOND FLOOR - [//�f��I tie'. f-o• Date:OCT. 11,1099 fllb.nl.ln An141ects 1 Iona! 1I0.1A 1,M.t I.A . Et.Ilr.d.I1M1. I-.!i..«.n1®M.... T.1.1 111•I7I•tltt /��r�• //��]]�� Taft t11•III.ItIt i u.w,to IWARIIIIIIIIIIni 'SAIL-- ! V"T.f�j� .._ . x H111 Illi b 5 -j m L...li: .. �Z Gi isIFIeeeeeeNh- - 4 .-' I 9f i I , -o-mF� 13 Z DIAC 1>.�—>r ==_ I •- t '`�-! -,.,-.... 0Wrt, BUILDING DELRAY BEACH,FL. SWINTON ELEVATION 1/I•. I.-,. EAST ELEVATION 1�t•. 1•I• .-.. 1:st!!l®I®h:cti , - $ue— -..MOM/ :elL���Ils: : i. - AC .. >�el%�Ile���1�1�11� -m K r— • II _- -- _�.... i s II _ �..•,. 4�a1 o.+.....� ' !� ! a! _ = F Kic1. REVISIONS: TIME ELEVATIONS NORTH ELEVATION I/I•. ,'-.• SOUTH ELEVATION 1!I•. r. Dwg.no.: A-3.0 Date:OCT. 11,1999 • e. I a. PLANT LIST • 1'I�.n•Otrr L•t 'Sr s JERRY TURNER • ^ KEY ecll]LirIGNAM CCHialNAM CITY HT DP & ASSOCIATES 0 O WY Gryeebelln.e Iota R.diq]' I.dllp CeeapLe 0 ]I• IS. wltr.,74•co 0 a•I Wool Cr Ina.any • am•3C• DATA.. 0 ® • � IIIIP a1 Car melrr.wleyen' Cann+Nil. 3 )'ev Crofts WDECML ARCIf1LCRMK NO Norton eleI der Oteu dr Tree I a' 4' Pot Pbk tree porn LAND FLA MIO • O O RR Mere ee.l.. Ledy P.M 7 4e• aa• O7NRC.•eWTAL I7[JtON O 2 0 a1R et,.II101.r..ggtru. ILlyd 1 Pr•dl.. a !4• JO• 0 1 .0 OK Gelphanu if.ue. Tiny i.e 71 74• u• O p • 0 TI cnrdyl.�. wn. TI PP11,n 74• u• O• �iyi3O VAR aArlllr.erUwloola Tnb.ti.' wr.lgei.d.46a1eel. 34 74• la' Roi.O.rs rr,r1.nn Rahn O 3 0 xu. pNlod•ndron'Xenedu' was et b• IV nur,NOn TI c.a0r•]>eae e 0, • 0 a..n e].-r.]e p o o o ,C1_• .K aria,,]..] 0 0 CAI M, I. 0 • I i- '• �� ® EXISTING TREE LEGEND LANDSCAPE DATA ZODIAC 12 x 0 •I_L•.K�lYliryi '3•'YlL1�.• G I Live Oak Relocate ]"r""'" DATA S O• 6, �f __ �© q p ] Live Oak Relocate TOTAL WAVED APDA re.re. �y Y BUILDING fli' ` e © l O 3 Tamarind Relocate �� it • O ^^ r O 4 Gumbo Limbo Relocate neariam rm....ne.oe tA.e.aer•e Ae•A enoem O O• 5 Black.ON. Remove % tie�]� /Dono O• 6 Clint. Remove ,k MEM marven •>'�O o — ______L 1 a C. Citrus Remove rnvi.eee...MOW DATA 0• 0 0 Tamarind Remain e 0 RE 0 9 Tamarind Relocate Mt LP roOiw+�ml nmex•een• 0 2 O m Tamarind RemeM mµi AMA rro'�oeo oe•Sr O ', O I Tamartnd Remetn .nee eru�]'m Ile 0 ' r O 7 LIVe Oak Remain ,Rah-T., . I."R.OS 0 L I — •0 3 Citrus Remain .e m M•teLe,m e. ..o I = 4 CIWeRemove rwnve•MAC.LrO•..1 M A r C1�i1 :":o,_o 1ZTCe O 5 CloreRemainra/ docesocovede �+ea neA Rawmw•• .c.fe..Q of IoLi I O° 6 Banyan Remain ~`"IDe'r'` Delray Death,FL 0 eo Go, O entneet x.me•n..n DATA AL.1 a of o 11 4• 0 ]..vAu..a..m MOD TO ee.um• I'O • f01 loin te.{li! O s.OF ALL ODOR MINT lunar.TO OE x.m• 111,o 1 to II A i MY i 0 W O t�e , °]11L ® J1 O' • ExUt tree to be ,01ti1.7."�m�RL°,.m � relocated or removed a .1.xa+*+*�nv+om •DOTS O 01 IN.: "O w 0• •'o ooC.]"',,. ,B..T(00 1 TOTAL.�eleeD.euAO•M•OCMnAKADAIDI MCA Maw., w. 0 �OO U'r ODOO 0 7�}, 0 1AElk -p0 ® ® Estill.Tree to Remain °o ® ® 1 :� oQ © J�o PLANTING NOTES: 0 y1 �e I f+l�; Jo'`:� Ad pt....rter rhea co.r,..to w,l.a.,m re.-re.ea No.l er w�.. 0 • I �r•t o 0oO 1l:;o no A,*• 8 wuedr Add STed..d.rer Weary n.n,r.l I.Ibusty H]a O 11 �^•�� .f•.Ig:.+�anc„�I• rya,a01 �ui..rrwd..o.p.l...er Agrw.rre T•nr.•... 0 / -� '/.v:�!•r/rto r1.'.. .:..• W AI A•...r.nb..Wn Mr...e..by.w of.../s nee peels aa.«..a ' ` i 1.MI IV/RAWRid w'n A'a• \ r II r An torels y .e.•r..eo.....N..re.,web.hpew ra......•b• 0 �.� .added.�U 1l Fg.lwr TenU.•hrW.eU+d..reared 0 6 ® En4 umlyptut�e u•r+Cbw4l+dbpav deh .0 e1]•b.drA • 0 •O ® ...r.cbr 4 r.peeble rer bee leg a t..d.Berd u m°..Fete.. MeeNl.en sr pW eg nev..l•v•wed..Raga O. ee.r.da le to mere..•m nelr.e4.e.gqlp++..Yew/et pore••req.ed to •t..w eraee� Me••w pop.•.pi..rg M...Md oo u....4upe pl..... CI � All Irr M brtlle Wlesew•1•.d erdhr field e..d.uldOf*M wfi w pYeeg Wuh Cl 0 16 1t .n T OT ote L`�.a� �/ 3 4) AepW,,pow tebbiMibd O..e feel To Neppe.N rbWe ® pl••ts. p ,bbAeyy.y.d.v pen•ped to pleearvd. y'.ro• S/]m w plot pn. na I _ _ rise...Ra del 0ywu.le.el.a.arw plod bde..deo...ew LandscapeLeM.upe Mdetect for/pm/v.I beam r.].l.N meer O.plat. t The Lh.d•r pe A.w1wc1 mos•dr...0.1 a11o.it 0.e pl.0 bra. P I a n An gamer deeded r.pipe ere .d ea a •.d W .m n be v .d by 0 Melt/elm nN•rn.peeens ee ple.l uYa-eh.....AO ary r•.aQ.r.l. leklItgV.L.M.bp•Ard...cl N le be nolbd ter W.r .en elu peeler to b R I • I II ♦ 0 e ♦ I. 40.•e.g pr44 runlet to tonIn✓h•y M pel.e.d d.t' r eulbn.0. ...dp111 p. IaI her.lOb..ppn.d by U.I..d•..p.Ardnc.. 1 AlUm a...re I•lsowlmope...t eke Ird.uO.e.er Val ance,p.a.u1u.,'at .It >ter.ate egndb be.bd WO.rme...........a.b.g•t •ID S]m W.l.er•.dr b brgla • .Digs of r�o.�y port. Yddup..d U.ed i Yee aloe,•d la u. all 4.d.up.ere.ere to be VOW Wed to provide•/Float or eon wo .ge L — I u..g x.1.e p.pbepl . o or I HISTORIC. ; PRESERVATION, BOARD ,. STAFF 'F F. ' REPORT Project Name: COA-394, Mary Hubbs, Noncontributing Triplex Project Location: 129 S. Swinton Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is that of approval for an elevation change pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1. PROJECT DECRIPTION !ANALYSISr The proposal is to change the roofing material from flat cement tile to fiberglass shingle; upgrade the front yard landscaping; repair the parking area; and change the exterior paint colors. At the October 6, 1999 meeting the Board continued this item to allow the applicant to present all of the design components proposed for the triplex: paint colors and location, shutter design, fence location and style. The Board will consider the change in roofing material, along with the documentation of undue financial hardship, when the applicant presents the final design components. The applicant has decided to eliminate the shutters and fence from the project. The proposal consists of the following items: Roof The noncontributing triplex was constructed in 1958. The request is to change the roof material from flat white cement tile to dark blue composition shingle, however the applicant will consider white shingles, if the cost does not significantly increase. The Design Guidelines, [LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(9)] and the Secretary of the Interior's Guidelines [LDR Section 4.5.1 (E)(4)], state that it is inappropriate to strip a roof of its historic material, i.e. slate, clay tile, wood or architectural metal. In the past the Board has denied replacing a tile roof with composition shingle, unless the denial would cause the applicant undue economic hardship. The applicant provided the required information to support economic hardship for the Board's review [ref. LDR Section 4.5.1(H)] as follows: Amount paid for property: $148,000 8/26/99 Assessed value 73,092 Real Estate Taxes 1,620 1999 Annual debt service 13,254 Rent per month, 3 units 1,650 Annual gross income 19,800 Annual net income 4,926 Meeting Date: November 3, 1998 Agenda Item: Ill-C Staff Report COA-393 Page 2 Estimates from Ron Bell Roofing: Cement tile $14,975 Composition shingle $6,020 Parking Area and Landscaping Plan for the front yard. Normally staff approves upgrades to the landscaping required by the 1996 Landscape Compliance Ordinance unless there is a 25% increase in the gross floor. Staff has reviewed this proposal. Three nonconforming back-out parking spaces are provided on Swinton Avenue. The property has been cited by Code Enforcement with respect to nonconforming landscape requirements and broken asphalt and curb stops. The applicant plans to resurface and stripe the asphalt and repair the wheel stops and landscape curbing. Landscaping The landscaping consists of providing foundation planting and plant screening for the a/c unit; planting 3 vertical elements in front of the building, planting ground cover to replace the sod/weeds on either side of the parking area; plant a shade tree and ground cover in the center landscape area; and plant a ficus hedge in front of the existing chain link fence on the south side of the front yard. If finances permit, the applicant will replace the chain link gate with a wooden gate to be painted white. The landscape plan will be available at the meeting. Paint colors and location The color proposed for the body of the structure is pale yellow. Originally the applicant planned to introduce a deep blue accent color on the front shutters. However, as the shutters have been eliminated due to cost, there is no place on the façade to add the dark blue trim color. Color scheme A. • Dark blue roof. • House pale yellow Color scheme B. As an alternative, staff has suggested the following to the applicant: • Change the proposed dark blue roof to white composition shingles. • Paint the soffit and drip flashing pale yellow. • Remove the grilles from the windows and paint the cement bricks white. • Paint the stucco pale yellow. Staff Report COA-393 Page 2 ALTERNATIVE ACTION.S 1. Deny the change in roofing material based upon a failure to make positive findings with LDR Sections 4.1.5(E)(4), and (9). 2. Approve the change in roofing material, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(H), that undue economic hardship would result if the application were denied. R.ECOMMENDATI°ON , 1. Approve the change in roofing material, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(H), that undue economic hardship would result if the application were denied. 2. Approve the landscape and driveway rehabilitation. 3. At the Board's discretion approve color scheme A or B, which will determine the color of the shingles. File/s/hpb/coa-394-H ubbs-sr l I I 11__J I I l i i ► L_J L_J 2 0 I• I III f L _ MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DRIVE N.E. ST. > w I > > Q > > --- Z— CITY._ HALL o 3NF-- o i r cc Z z —d n N a N.W. 1ST— ST. N N.E. 1ST / ST. J w COMMUNITY Z Z CENTER z Z w U w : Z w Z Z N TENNIS OLD STADIUM Q SCHOOL SQUARE I I I ATLANTIC l AVENUE POLICE SOUTH I i COMPLEX COUNTYCOURT HOUSE 0a Li _ S.W. 1ST ST. . 1ST ST. Z 11111 o It N o_ �� - z Z� �NNE Km � w N N. ■ = V) -■ um - o m Nmu - ■ S.W. 2ND ST. S.E. 2ND ST. NI W vi •. ¢ _ 3 _ z w LJ- vi N Li N N N If) N W N --som.- 129 SOUTH SWINTON AVENUE PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FL -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM214 46. HISTORIC PRES'ERVATION BOARD STA�FF ` REP.ORT; Project name: COA-9-388, Music Box, now known as 32 Degrees Project location: 16 East Atlantic Avenue, Old School Square Historic District ITEM' BEFORE T HE: BOARD ' The item before the Board is aesthetic consideration of a flat wall sign pursuant to 4.6.7(E)(7) of the LDRs. PROJECT DESCRIPTION /ANYLISIS . The proposal came to the Board for approval of a site plan modification and architectural elevation on August 4, 1999. The sign was deleted from the plans, as the applicant planned to redesign a. The proposed sign has changeable copy and marquee lights. This was a popular sign method used by theaters and entertainment facilities many years ago. The applicant is requesting this sign style to advertise the entertainment groups appearing at this location. For many years changeable text was denied in the City, however it was approved by the HPB in 1996 for the Back Room Bar which was in the same location. Additionally, in 1996 SPRAB approved changeable text for an automobile dealership and for the Musician's Exchange formerly on Atlantic Avenue. The sign is consistent with Art Moderne architectural style of the building and will be placed over the front entrance. The applicant has provided a narrative of the technical aspects of the sign, which is attached to this report. The sign will be reviewed by the Building Department on Friday, October 29th. Their technical comments and recommendations will be presented at the meeting. ALTERNATIVE "ACTIONS 1. Continue with direction. 2. Deny, with reasons stated. 3. Approve as presented RECOMMENDED ACTION; Approve the flat wall sign submittal based upon positive findings pursuant to Section 4.6.7(E)(7), with the following condition: That the sign has been approved by the Building Department. File/s/coa-388-32 Meeting date: November 3, 1999 Agenda Item: III-D • aright Image : -:_- c, IGIJ S Yj EN, S - ' .%: 10/95/99 Patricia Cayce Historic preservation Planner City of Delray Beach Re: 32 Degrees sign Dv 1 Thanks for meeting with us to discuss This project. As you can tell, we're quite excited about this i '1h project! As you suggested, here is a brief synopsis. of the slynape program. The "32" and degree mark will be pushed through the brushed aluminum background The le ter forms are from clear acrylic with tr ansiuscent blue applied to the face of the text. The word "degrees" will be also cut from the brushed background but will be flush with the brushed fascia. Internal illumination will be from fluorescent lamps with the "32" forms to have blue neon behind as an extra accent. The old style theatre marquee letter ino is from translucent blue formed uvex and will be mounted to the brushed background from stainless steel tracks. ►he accent lighting above and below the marquee lettering will be tom low profile wa t lightbulbs. The bulbs will not flash or `chase" but will be controlled from a dimmer switch boated at a remote source. • The total square footage of the `32 deem�1' to is 1 C.5 square Toot and the Theatre marquee lettering with the bulbs is 21.43 square foot_ The allowable square foo=aoe for this busi_,ess is 72 square, Toot (L8 iih. Foot front Xi =72 sq. it.) The total aggrecate square footage of the- lettering and marquee is 37.33 square foot. • We are looking forward to presenting this =efore you and the historical board. l hankfyou, ' v Glen A. Welden Principle/Director of Desi n 513NJ Since 1;7; -1 7,-3„ \— ' , Lellering cut from brushed aluminum background panels, • internally illuminated and finished in frosted blue tones, QI-I3f-lt 1 - - �__1_ -' — ---_ _�_ ,._ 'A 1,. if. 9711r1 F..L.I';15 19 �t.�,.f.l .,� t, - -�- 'i i ..5� •., �.., �.I_ —__- -_ •t,,i,:n i4(„ °r,k, ,,,,,1 I t'fi I r ,., ,;,,,,!,)r; l' Fit ,t :!.i-k1`c f ..,L , r, f 11 ,,y,.i I n� ;p-,',• t�'11. r 1 ;:0,.J,i' / I•,,1,11 } tl ,,,,Al,'I.,:4 `,,,i°.i 1. I i -rot. i f t{ r?Ir 1yvf,�,1 ,„ t!'r t; `l fri• l 4 ify 1 r 1 -�1,f,1 i ...-..... . 9. r"il ,I� � I'li- �c 1, ' l,�•, ljq� 1,,{r' 18 I � I,yy �,N, 'f>a�l�til • -,--� .i{r;i•5, i. dge —.. t •:4' TCFt' 1, r: A t rfili'. 'It :� `t5 J l#rk • rl' N"kil i I Ir 1 ,.Ji•S J Iul'`! ,Ir, i i1h:1TF?tlili+: 1,1 • , ,••1'i'v. r, I Fr ia,'. , ,� !: t /:::. , �.11 c i , ,( t ` t� f;>s, �'n�..l � 1',5 , i �yl +� .), I. 4��',1 ..S sicrl sysrrf.,; °1 t} 1 ,{ .1,t ¢ !. .1. ,t'.�.4,r.,U/ 5 (,7. { 1,t! ;,t^il� • +'- �'r�''J:'f� �+•'. 1 .cl.Yr , ���i h�'cc,,'tl dd!'Yc:;','1� ' e'r' I' S,r� t .t .fi;V iiu 11I;I.,i.. '"4'� I'l. I '.i1 J . It, I t. .1, �`� I II e.• 1! t �' L,i aa•nrnnlun,•, 1,' I a_l,iitli:IL ..I" ,lo�!�ii II o� 'i•I1, •l I ;�.. t � 1 i5 d15 i r. ( (r ) t t S r 1. ., .. „1�, it l��Y" ��n�l di�!1.7� ,7 Ih:�'•�� ��• 1:.tc�l'i� IIV,N) illhf/ •i ,I. 1 M•• .,.. :r ' ...t Q �>!' ,rt i 1`•'1!t' Iccr, alEl�' 1,J I ,� 4f'I ,� �, u • ,�l?o. ' i �+• rl� .I 'F +t'' u 1` 1 h1 '?i r l; ,''r i,'' 11�1 ii,•,�,•:Cb•};' i, ,t 1� ? • :a •' r• f, 1, t 4!,1clI t ` �tr.�i4•It;, •,_.•1� P'{tf f11111t' i.; I1' .',`J"I ' : ', I y » J y ca•Hra,v N i � r ti� ,1,�1.I' :1 r4'4,1'r I �,, i '� o ; 171 ,�t 71 I ,'1 � 1 ,1., ii�.!� 1• '41/i�`,Ii1 +, �TJFirtcIv,cav, (ir, It.rl' I .I. ,•I tt 1 1 rI `7 I , 't' rl, 1 ,, F I '.1,• (•i:'�l, ,.)..' ` t 1 'r ri;..ji I �'',�• :,':%,, f ra �;.) I I'1` �1�t'. 1 ,'. 1i�, �;�' /.W, 1'gluri r ill1,yj:J o ••+ �114" l.I {f i'4'1 ,1 1' ,,i,l)t)4S 1 •;li: i j�I� I it' 44ll'11' .i',. '.,ti!. ;r. ,� �.1.0..� i;.J,•I°cc r1 UJC/II ( :., • '� it} , ,I •,. ,0. ' i k ?� 2' �'11f;•I, .y, '` lrJ±,pr f ,. .I .1► •a�l; :. ,• ,.;•, !. -7p -t7 � It. ;i+ d 1 �rr','1:1�4`f;i� i!,��j ytC .�%i:;r.l•>. :5,� , � t�1nl'� :i�.'•1.11 ar,Y II :'• S •.; � , �, t . rt! 4.1 ,; .:1' S' S' ( q,... r)�'�I t 1 (,, �• r I,• j,f r1 t i'1.1 f`,1 )1i•!! , . iSl t �.��..n%'+• � V�!!! , r4i::' ,1yZij 4 1 n111 '• ��r I tb, a /�It+l•11ItS1Q({!1t ,•�;.t I'�1:�J P(, ,ff;. '� •.1,1,;}i J✓.�','fy1,Ih.1. 1y`;{ Y1?1.14 r�, i. I' 1... .77.",..,;. 'i'4: 1',.t';It1•., � •+fi i ' .t..r' Sir.'.rA.1. t)-71;;:.. ijl,4{�,. t t..,ti;.. I,0!�,q 4-I!Ni1t, • ,4 °ei.Jo.,,ISIr 1a?:)Vl(1P Ii�:414ii/,t'.? 1(-„ • t t.` .4�! ��r >l,, �i. ,,i t fj,;.,',,.;'';t I''�G ii'•• (i, 1i,Ikt1G ,,Fri jii i: ,.. •,I ir.T ,,, ., • ,.k•I. '...ht r., :a t ' ,i ''. 1 `�y. rii ' qIit •`A'7-r1tii& ® ®dp:7 :F '�•:®. •ccit •, ice' as ®-1' i � � t r r I�i ! ; 7 k'1ru. }• •• i ::Slot 'a. N t r ' Ft WO. :,1 " rJSU: ; ,. �D•. . � �' ,tt} . ;y iv- r• O. 1' ., '� ' _i 32 degrees • el COL J s:, �}vQ_�_$-$ (itI fit*.Y t•�RF 0:•l,�4i.Q_�l%1:� G l';�i r i. 1' , O �V'J'?'� .`) IciD c!_ .Tll Brushed aluminum • n,vn: -- Two rows of individual clear blue low watt bulbs background 1 n06/99 Ott tall Individual dimensional theatre marquee lettering in OEN -translucent blue 3450 finish, Facsia Section for 32 Degrees . . . , • . , , Bright ., Image SIGt1 SYSTEMS PCCV-Cf•ilyr.C.Mir CMS'In.14'04 C(Y.V,r1IIIRIVI.1 — _—.11__ reMID IL!riMVC!CRiEr; 10 rtrrAtt CISItA)S Of tXlitrt.)140•:1' t(CTI...,______ H-___;.__ g,, Veffits MIN. . Eilir eYer'A. . cowor P,1.1 c• 1,15.txtrii.t«vcci II -- — --1.-- -. Il ii "01.111 10 RV?/I--..,... SCR/r1 I ‘1. tirCrijI11.11 I V r; It . i ' 1,•• :.21.i'I:r :011..:1.:!1.1l:kV? 561-278-781,1 I .....m_____.. ..____. :. •:- • 1.:'-',:'•••.-1'.t. .• . . ...• - . ..., :.....;., --'=-, 561-'2711•0259 rAx . . , ) 11 Cl Ti.r.'!.'IA 'v ',-..,p•q1„ .175ft.,n1.5••ift CORNY MACH 11011%11.V1 I War Plrlri ti (------- -) ',‘•r‘.. .;...(1)Itjt I.0 6 ly..es f„ri Prt1 CIA MONtl S(TIMM ----------.........______ _ ,MI monni •••,. .7.:.orr.1.1._.......Ly '. !' . ?,vis .:,1 •,1 -7 ':',••• ' 1" .,..,;.7.T"•"'":'.7. ,..:017;7,.-t .77.1%:•.7.7.",r-1.7.....' I.....:... .7.7!:.ty,-;•:.-•••••- ..••• —- 1 :,. • ;,,„•.,, - . .• .., 14, f .:1 I li )01,4,3 • fr..:..' / •::••..,._.=. ,.......:,;:. ,=...: JAI . . • •.•..! ., . -1/ • ..... • :, ..J.,••••.,,•1." ,f.! • ' . )iti 'rig, ., ri:Cir•ti "."1" "4i ••- C?NI.',RI IMMO , 1 ... , , / / 0 . -, ., .., ,05 . . , .... , ) .„ // , , e Mu t/IPAI • , • / . / MIMED „,.. . cif pi,' 0, i , . •• ••u •.. SU:CO • 0.) (7) •I flrtii, , • . .. A 1 I It • [1 ; * / , .--.. -'" • -,- - • - • z -rim Ito Ixl.rt - „ .. (;) 32 degrees , ,/• . . ., _ . • , ..•• f-----.._ • . . :T. Q) Q.!) -45.5. :..41.g..,F. ... . 1 . TR), .'.:..• •.1 .. 7.111.."1qJCIV-11-cr. • .r.JII?..01.-•• 1,- ... I (31 Ill i-FRX..1"1-1!C y.Vie t.:1, .1I1. 35 R . 10/06/1 l i9 9NORTH E . VATON BRAWNBY:scAL , , , • 0 W 11111 Norl-li Elevation for 32 Degrees riiii . . . .. . . . • • • .. •• • . • • . . .. • • • • ••.. . .. . ...• . • . . . .. , :. . . . . .. . . . . . , . . • . 1 • , r" • 151^W 1 l>J� I ; i ice, 11 ICI / 1_II jl� HI; ,1 II�I I I .--=� I +7A1JUNr"1 I II f I I I I 1—i I I al ! i i1—ice -NNS 1>! '_<' :_D 1 II J ', nr , ;II 1 1 —, ;I ' 1 1111 111 1111 l i fia 1-i , ; ; 1=11 I • , ; i=1 I j 1, /LH I ! _1 I I I --_! ;�-__:7 .<• 1 I_i I .I pot _ - - �i�!''�- l it': <i i I 1 i i�l I ! 1 \S.' -•j i ���; j ��l; ! i 1_ — --- I II 1 1 =l1 1_I II I^I (i Z-1 — �I _:I _- —' n - I I _ ;1 i 1i— I. i ' i=. ,L;— i i iili— I i=—� j�1 �J—_ — HISTORIC PR ES ERV=ATI'Q`N BOARD STAFF REPORT_' Project Name: COA-398, Accents & Decor Project Location: Seaboard Airline Railroad Station at Historic Depot Square, West Atlantic Avenue and 1-95 (80 Depot Square). ITEM BEFORE THE B OAR-D The action requested of the Board is that of approval for a change of exterior paint color for the train station, pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1. BACKGROU'ND ' The 1927 station is listed on both the Local and National Registers. It was formerly an office for Wittmer Environmental, Inc. and has recently been purchased by Accents & Decor of E. Atlantic Avenue for use as an additional show room and storage area. This proposal came to the Board on October 20th, as neither the applicant nor his agent was present, the item was continued and no formal action was taken. However, the Board rejected the colors as presented: Body, yellow Accent, royal blue Trim, white Roof, terra cotta The Board understood that the proposed colors are the signature colors for the Accents & Decor building on E. Atlantic Avenue, however they felt that the colors were not appropriate for the historic train station. They felt that the yellow body color was acceptable but that a pale pink/coral/sandstone (the original color of the station) would be more appropriate. They rejected the royal blue trim and suggested that a pastel blue or green would be more authentic and compatible. The board rejected the concept of the horizontal band, which runs along the north portion of the structure, feeling that it should be eliminated. The applicant was sent a copy of the findings from the October 20th meeting and has asked to be placed on the agenda with a revised color scheme. The colors will be available at the meeting. ALTERNATIVE 1. Continue with direction. 2. Deny with reasons stated. 3. Approve as presented. • RECOMMENDATION Board's discretion File/s/hpb/coa-398-accents&décor-sr2 Meeting Date: November 3, 1999 Agenda Item: III-E CONGRESS AVENUE r'JLAN✓ I < AUTO CENTER N W 3~� ST. > - MDS WHOLESALE BEAUTY SUPPLIES KEYSTONE \ ___ CREATIONS w < w N.W. D 2ND N.W. 2ND ST. Z 'ST. WE. PALM TRAN 1 3 x SATELLITE Q I Z I h FACILITY I 1 C J N.W. 1ST ST. MARTY FLADELL DRIVE �x W LiN.W. 1ST ST. DELRAY U _ 3 A V✓NING z — U) `O — cn RC`4L - LLJ COMM. — PARK OF DEL,R.A Y z \ 0 5 z , I O CHEVRON E g c� PJ � N 1• — 1 .JF' a„1-----3______ _ . ��� 11 RINKER .� w_5 MATERIALS / 1ST \''' L,_i ,CONGRESS y SOUARE ST. N / I I Li N -iima- WITTMER ENVIRONMENTAL CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FL (OLD TRAIN STATION) PLANNING k ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM397 HISTORIC "`PRESERVATIGN= BOARD. "' STAFF REPORT Project Name: COA-9-377, Rhoden Building, Steve Cohen Owner, Kelly Maudsley, Agent. Project Location: 2 East Atlantic Avenue, southeast corner of E. Atlantic Avenue and S. Swinton Avenue. ITEM' BEFORE THE :BOARD-- The action requested of the Board is that of approval of an elevation change to allow a vertical pipe on the west façade to be enclosed with aluminum and painted to match the building. PROJECT ANALYSIS ; The Board approved the elevations on March 3, 1999 and the associated components are nearly completed. A pipe on the exterior of the two-story portion of the west façade was discovered when the faux brick pilasters were removed. The pipe has been _ concealed with aluminum to appear as a gutter downspout, as opposed to channeling the pipe into the wall. The aluminum will be painted to match the wall. The owner has submitted a letter, which is attached to this report, explaining why this method was chosen. As the pipe was not shown on the approved elevations, it must be approved by the Board. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Approve, as requested. 2. Deny, with reasons stated. RECOMMENDATION Board's discretion. File/s/px/hpb/coa-377-rhoden Meeting Date: November 3, 1999 Agenda Item: III-F 10-26-1999 12:37PM FROM JACOBSON, COHEN & COHEN, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 800 NW 62rd Street Suite 200 Fort Lauderdale,FL 33309 Phone: (954)491 69'11 Fax: (954)491-6586 Toll Free in Florida: 1-800-843-0226 Internet: http://www.jacobson-cohen.com Stephen J.Cohen Daniel E.Jacobson Steven E.Cohen ' October 26, 1999 Ms. Pat Casey Historic Preservation Board Delray Beach, Florida VIA FACIMILE:561.243.7221 Re: Rhoden Building-2 East Atlantic Blvd. Dear Pat; In response to your questioning about the west side of the building I would like to inform you of the results of my investigation. It is clearly almost impossible to effectuate the change you requested. However, I do believe there will be no need once you examine the following fact. -The pipe was a hidden condition in a pilaster chase that had faux brick on it -To move the pipe inside requires the breaking up of a sidewalk to tie into sewer lateral -To move the pipe would require breaking into the footer of the building -It would also require breaking the slab inside The Haitian Art business, which would be very intrusive and disruptive to the business -It would require the changing of the wall, and the changing of the configuration of the interior of the building -It would require the reconfiguring of the piping upstairs in the Trends & Traditions business to accommodate a vent system, which would be very intrusive -Looking at the building now you see the pipe because it is covered with white aluminum with a grey stucco background -Once the building is painted, the awnings installed, the planters installed, the shutters installed, and, it is not stuccoed it will look like a natural downspout -the Yama Sushi building had electrical service on the outside of the building and they chased it In summary the effect will not be noticeable, the building costs prohibitive, the disruption to our tenants extensive. Should you need any further information please feel free to call me. Ver 4 yours, • Steven E. Cohen • • id J I I I 1 [ " I 1 I 11 I I IL___!! ! I 11 1 'J j 1 I i N.AR-1N LU-r-- • !:'.0 .i=. -DP V� .-. 2ND ` ST. W 1 1 1 I-' .. 1 w 1 I 11 w I< �; > < < 11 Tiq/ 11 c II II I I ALL 1 1 1- 1 1 I= II I_, l I 11 II / N.W. 1ST I ST. N.= 1ST ST I u 1 } s CC.:-.Y ,'UNITY D :EIJTEr Li Liv Li w < TENN."S 0_J ~— STADIJM SCHOOL I i 1 SOUAPE I1 it ATLANTIC AVENUE III POLICE I SO' -� I w 1 firi 1 1 1 1 ' I , ,COMPLEX i COU!''_Y > , , COL:=, </ I I II_ I HO S_ . IIIIII.m II � I 51 11 I I << I II < I II w� ` 1 s.w. ST. -.E. 1ST ST. C c itt • 1 N 1 O 11 1 v, `— II N I_ w z II �, 1 11 II i 11 1 ( 11 II S.W. • 2ND ST. S.E. 2ND ST. II I IIII 1 I 1 il E7<)/ i 31 I ' �� vi I I I I = 11 I : I z 3 L N 1 I I 1 . N I N W �, N In I, I ii ) i 11 , i 11 , I • N \ —ima-- 2 EAST ATLANTIC AVENUE PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FL -- DGITAL L'L.S(MAP S.STEM -- MAP REF: L14214 mil' '� 7' h µ . , •� ;,,.�;, 'i i< 150 N. Swinton Avenue-Suite 100 - Delray Beach, FL 33444 0 561.272.1207 FII r` left@gate net . www.castleflorida.com . Fax 561.272.0117 GENF_[il'tB_C(?N�filtCTf)R e-mail: .^ ^. November 3, 1999 To: Historic Preservation Board From: Lloyd Hasner, Castle Florida Robert Dittman, Esq., Spinner, Dittman et al Re: Shutter Attachments We have assembled a list of residences in the Historic District where there exists non- operable shutters which are attached directly to either the stucco or siding of the respective buildings (no spacing). It was impossible for us to ascertain whether these shutter materials were wood or vinyl by viewing them from the sidewalk. 125 NE 1st Ave. 245 SW 1st Ave. 112 N. Swinton Ave. Adjacent to (north) of 215 SE 1st Ave. 138 N. Swinton Ave. 212 SW 1st Ave. 200 SE Swinton Ave. 311 N. Swinton Ave. 201 SW 1st Ave. NE corner NE 4th St. & Swinton Ave.(Dr. Lawrence) 219 SW 1st Ave. 342 SE 1st Ave. 225 SW 1st Ave. 238 SE 1st Ave. 229 SW 1st Ave. Off the corner of SE 2nd St. & SE 1st Ave. 235 SW 1st Ave. 23 S. Swinton Ave. Damiano's -N. Swinton Ave. 342 NE 1st Ave. 0' HISTORIC. PRESERVATION BOARD STAFF REPORT Project Name: Cason Cottage, Historical Society expansion. Project Location: 5 NE 1st Street 1TEEM , BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is that of making a recommendation to the City Commission that an additional building be allowed to be placed on the lot at the northeast corner of NE 1st Street and N. Swinton Avenue. PROJECT DECRIPTION /ANALYSIS The Delray Beach Historical Society is in need of office space and is currently renting the first floor of the Judge Knott Center. After consideration, and based on the advice of a house museum consultant, they propose to relocate an historic building, or construct a new structure, on the corner of N. Swinton Avenue and N.E. 1st Street to the west of Cason Cottage, facing Swinton Avenue. The lot is 131' deep and Cason Cottage is located on the extreme southeastern portion of the property so there is sufficient room to house another building. If variances were required these could be considered by the HPB. The City owns the property; therefore it will be necessary for the City Commission to approve locating an additional building on the site. Staff, and representatives of the Historical Society, met with the City Manager and the Assistant City Manager to discuss the proposal on October 25, 1999. Mr. Harden felt the proposal was acceptable and asked that the HPB make a recommendation to the City Commission. Attachment: Letter from James A. Abbott, House Museum Consultant File/s/pz/hpb/cason cottage Meeting Date: November 3, 1998 Agenda Item: IV-A h FROM . IULE PHONE IJO. : .5 1+26t.8945 Oct. 21 1999 09:52Ht1 P2 1E• ILI fire 410 Sb 6567 F.O?.rj3 Recommendation for OflicelExhibition Facilities The Delray Beach Historical Society For the purpose of enhancing both the presentation and administration of the Delray Beach Historical Society's Cascn Cottage Museum,I wish to recommend the construction of a visitors' center which would accommodate offices,some storage,and exhibition space. This structure would he built on the existing adjacent lot,owned by the sperety. The following is a brief description of what I recommend. Architecture I propose having the new structure mirror the existing historic cottage in its overall proportions and general architectural details. This includes roofline and window configuration. (some windows may be devised as false--appearing as openings on the exterior,but not limiting the valuable interior well surface.) Thus,the new structure would appear--or arced"—as another residence,in the style of an early-20th century cottage or"bungalow"-type house.Distinguishing it from the actual cottage would be an intentional simplification of architectural details, moldings,etc. (Windows would be modem,double-pane examples, similar only in proportion/size),as well as a physical positioning of the structure further back from the street. The concept of duplicating the existing architecri,re is very important. A modern structw-e, contemporary in design and proportion might serve as a visual distraction to understcrading the neighborhood/location as a residential area of the earl ;o mid-2Oth century. Equally important, I think an 'historical'con cut for the design of a new lndlding will Hake the construction more appealing to the present neighborhood residents. • Offices The main purpose of this new structure would be to provide for office space for the society's administration. These offices should be"adaptable"to change,perhaps with a series of "moveable"walls which would allow for the configuration to chAmge with the needs of the organization. • Exhibition Space A large gallery space should be provided for actual historicai exhibitions,as well as for - exhibitions promoting the worksJachievements of contemporary residents of Delray Beach. The space should be flexible in its configuration,in a capacity similar to that proposed for the offices. Walls should be moveable, allowing for one large gallery to be divided into two separate gallery spaces. Perhaps a systam of storage cabinets and closets could be devised"behind"the gallery walls--accessible though the`opening"of flush panels/doors in the walls. When not in use, these would appear to `disappear' into the architecture of the room. Wails should be covered d FP0I1 : GLE PHrJ aE I O. : 561+2E6 E9-5 T_ o� Oct. 21 1999 119:�i3F1 P3 0= 1_ 9 :c: 10 al.k 430 39; tSt P 07.97 with burlap,painted in a nuetral color. This is a most forgiving surface, which is receptive to numerous paintings and nail holes,etc. The purpose of this space would allow nor only for the enhancement of understanding and appreciation for local historv, but also for the encouragement of local artisans and artists. Exhibitions could be organized in a variety of warns, both through the society's existing staff and those of lace institutions. Perhaps an annual competition of artists could be arranged Such events encourage return visitation and allow citizens to see the society as an ever-growing institution. The gallery space should be usable by other local groups and organizations. Depending on the architectural integrity of the space,it might be good to consider it as a pc Bible income generator whereby the room(s)would be made available for a small fee. Regarding this proposal,it is • important to consider the inclusion of a small kitchen. Jam nor sure of the demands for such a space in the community. However, in providing this type ofroom to interested parties, the society allows itself to be seen as more of an Integral part of the pre.ant community. Summation There is no doubt to the need for additional faclites for the Delray Peach Historical Society. Office,storage,and multi-function spaces are required for the successful_fulfilment of the society's mission—the preservation,promotion,and interpretation of the community's history. With the creation of a new building,the society will be allowed to sharpen the presentation of preserved historic st±.ictures,which are currently divided between interpretive and administrative uses. The same proposed szucture will allow for a potentially expanded role for the society within the community. Proposed exhibition can broaden the appeal of the society,increasing membership and return visitation. Janes 1+,,,:?bout �''� r .99 TOTAL P.e3 r Al- IN r(' :_:.(. N "•,. i ,...,,,,,, -E, 1 e. I I i j ..1. GARAGt 21 VI . , . . .'' - ' . CONCRETE OMIT ti z tt,.00' (R) 1 3 1.04...'_(M) 72 35' I . Viv.w..0 . , .!.,_- ____ -- /!-----22.19P'1 (M) I -- 4"5 "'''')( ?- -7,-: __pEEF(0-vf:1DRRIGC7,), 1 t i ----5 ' e 90' , I f 1 '... r''''''•'s,-'._;..'-•ceiPPA 4°L 1 t1(RE EN T' -1— / Irit ''s--P RC POSED PROPERTY LINE .......;w! I' / 1 n 7'1 's''s 1 ,.. • . • ,2:i ,/ I1 ..... . . / cci a pD.C•POcEDUc PARKING\ , / -,2; . % \ ‘40(TYP) \-PROPn'-',ED 2 0' PAVEMENT— , II _ _ _ _ _ _ 2 , . . . _ _ _ _ _ 1 .• _ _ _ -,- .- ----PROPOSED / - II / HEADER CURE ›— 1 'N 1 I LLI i• . I . 1 i I I I- —I I I I I I 8. I I I i ID CL i _I _I I 1 I I I I• 1 -•.1 1 ---1 CC:Air-ACII CAi-i PARI<ING 1 -1-1 ‘..., •:., r 1 1_1_1 I T- 1 1— T —I T- 'I 'O L•"•': :-.,5 I I I i I I i 1 I I C= I I I Col I I I I I I I I i c--,•- i ) I I ' I. I I I I I I yi II/ I I 1 I \ I I I I I 1 1 ........../.• . - r ' \--PROPOSED SOD PARKING 1 ' . I 1 ;I. I • I / PROPOSED ; I M TYPE '0' I ,I-PROPCSE i • ---,- ANGO i . I csi t. .. 17.E'" i.:._. 't .., / CURE- ' ••- !, I (TY13) •.- ; ''' ;• . i• , I -•-• ! ll F.7, , .§E: , . , .....,___...-----7Thic,Dr.:- ,. i ____, _.y L. 1 IJ I I I I I I I if;-NY-- 1 weco .'..•: I' • I I I imEr I I ..._,,I TREE • •,1, FCL: IEI I 1 1 I---- I 1 J', 11 51 1 1 I I....__11'.--:---1------1--L--V ---:- if c D I •. ; -. -I-7 ---....- r,L : .-"-7.;Zf- -1 _LI > I L i I. I OAK L----i 1--1.--r-I—1-7—.1----j."--1-7.1.—1 1 1 i TRL. i.,-- -,.-1 • .1 \ . I I, ',7,.._- _.. i Rs..? I `-',2' < • , ; ..—.1 TREE._ I _.- .. . , 10! _•. 1 • TREE ._ - --• U s . \--/ 1 ••:, ,0 4 I ;_..._.__._._______..--EMS• .c cs : 1-.:4 I t--• H- • .1: 0 ' • 1 \, • PARKING LOT—, c , . n Z I /.f-'i; 1 E- it . 1 ••,•-, —PRoPeSED PAvED \ 2.R. 2 F._ — •,..-' ' ' .'S---'-, CNI FARKING,--\ \D'R.--7 • • .—. ,••, li I ...-_-.-1 • I ,r) OAK a : H p H ile I ,_ 1 -: ;g:''... . c•-.1.2.- TREE 9' 1 . , I i I. -.,-- ,-• -co .; •1 (TYP) (TYP) (TYP) •i •--- ., , — — — 1:._, , , •: .i . . . I I ! ; t 'i •. _._ OAK • --t--, I, l• !• •• t TREE , PC4L . I 25. ! . I.a.401:I - poiN0ANA•,i• , .' '.•_ ! 16' (TYP) %..*. •. 16 ..., EXIST. 1. i1 I -,,••• ' F, ; P.O.W. I ! i• a. ...1- I PALM n• -•i.‘• 1..60! i ; ,., ONE-STORY itb Ili [ ' i . 'MEE COVERED WOOD FRAME I -sep 1 (. ) si..Ae FiNt5i-ED FLOOR EL.. :j 1,i ',..i . 21.30 6.1.- 1 1 •..7 ,7-..i.E-it-CiP • • -c 1 I - Ti I , I ;-- - CREttliD. I. . ....... . - .„.„.-- -F-79F-'•C'i 1 : , ___ I .K TREE (TYR-) -....L.• L.! • CEO AL • .. • 13.50• to ' ,l- 7., .____.. . _ • .,, C:::NC. POLE- •'. "i,-..1:1L..--2.-'it•. . ' •' -ct !, .,,I 12.35' 5.954 1 E.IF: f 1 • • ; ... , -- .... -- •--- QZ, V- ----- I\'- • . t. .1 31 CO (R)• • . 1.31.0S' (k4).• •• : • • •• • ', . EP.'OEVCE---1 ,i .t s't ." . ...-- 1 12 '..L'.,I is ._.. hAT -8 i 1 _ _ 1 \ --r, N.E. •, u, 1st STREET t; , — _ ...._.... 7._-7.----- ....'----PAINTED PAvEmENY--/ __ ,JARKIN,15 r1 TRINITY LUTHERAN1 LAKE IDA ROAD N.E. 4TH Si. — CASON — METHODIST — CHURCH 0 Z r . LLi 2 _ > —> >a a a vi a v N.W. 3RD ST. N.E. 3RD ST > �'-1 =¢ 3 D 2 O _x CI T Y W cc ATTORNEY w 1 BUILDING Q o o w z L.,7 . MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. BLVD. N.E. 2ND ST o z N 0 Q F liii I- I rY I I o HALL ; i C 0 1 Lj L`' z I N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST ST Z u.i w z O z z �' COMMUNITY z CENTER Z OLD o SCHOOL _ a SQUARE TENNIS STADIUM I T A T L A N N T I C AVENUE SOUTH al li Q Q IIIQI w COUNTY O o a a ri- - �—`r N a 1- HOUSE w Li w w V) V) V) V1 N ui u, N CASON COTTAGE SITE PLANNING DEPARTMENT # - CASON COTTAGE k , - SUBJECT AREA CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL W -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM03O Y,r HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD STAFF REPORT. AMENDMENT TO LDR SECTIONS 4.4.24(B)(9) AND 4.4.24(F)(1), ADDING LOTS 19 THROUGH 24, BLOCK 69 TO THE LIST OF LOTS IN THE OSSHAD (OLD SCHOOL SQUARE HISTORIC ARTS DISTRICT) ZONING DISTRICT THAT MAY BE DEVELOPED PURSUANT TO CERTAIN STANDARDS OF THE CBD (CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT) ZONING DISTRICT ITEM BEFORE T H E, BOARD The item before the Board is making a recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Board and the City Commission, regarding a privately initiated request to amend LDR Section 4.4.24 Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD), subsections Permitted Uses and (F) Development Standards. The proposed amendment is to add Lots 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, and 24, of Block 69 to the list of lots within the OSSHAD zoning district that can: 1) be developed pursuant to the standards of the CBD District, and 2) have the same principal uses as the CBD. DESCRIPTION /ANALYSIS The request has been made by the agent for the Worthing Place mixed use project. The changes are necessary to accommodate the construction of a 3-story parking garage on Block 69. The subject properties are located on the west side of SE 1st Avenue, between the two east/west alleys located within Block 69 (see Exhibit A). Three of the lots are developed with structures. Lot 19, adjacent to the south alley, contains a single family Mission • Revival style residence with a garage in the rear which has been converted to an apartment, both were constructed in 1925. Directly to the north, on Lot 20, is a single family residence in the vernacular style with a cottage to the rear, the house was constructed in 1949 and the cottage, which is older, was moved to the site in 1959. The vernacular style building on Lot 24, the northernmost lot, was constructed in 1919 as a single-family residence and has since been converted to an office. To the rear of Lot 24 is a garage, which was built in 1951 and has been converted to an apartment. The following is a summary of the zoning history of these lots. Please note that due to the fact that zoning maps and codes do not exist for every single year prior to the 1980's, these dates are approximate. Additional research is being conducted to try and determine exact dates of the reported zoning changes. Meeting Date: November 3, 1999 Agenda Item: IV.B. P. HPB Staff Report LDR Amendment—Block 69 in OSSHAD Page 2 The earliest zoning map available in the Planning and Zoning Department is dated 1962. On this map, Block 69 as well as the west half of Block 77 is zoned R-3, Multiple Family Dwelling District. The R-3 zoning allowed single and multiple family dwellings, as well as hotels as permitted uses. Conditional uses included membership clubs, nursing or convalescent homes/hospitals/clinics, and cluster development. Structures were permitted to a height of 45 feet. Building setbacks were as follows: 25' front and street side, 10' interior side, and 10' rear. The 1970 zoning map indicates that the lots were zoned RM-2, as was the western half of Block 77. The RM-2 district allowed single and multi-family dwellings (up to 9 units) as permitted uses, and allowed multi-family dwellings of more than 9 units, as well as numerous nonresidential uses by special exception (referred to in the current LDRs as conditional uses). The list of nonresidential uses included facilities such as churches, clubs, hotels/motels, parking, nursing homes, schools, business and professional offices, and civic and public buildings. Structures were permitted to a height of 23 feet, and up to 45 feet by special exception. Building setbacks were as follows: 25' front and street side, 15' interior side, and 20' rear. In 1972 the RM-2 zoning district was eliminated, and the property was rezoned C-1, Limited Commercial (as was the west half of Block 77 the east half was zoned CBD). In contrast to the regulations of the RM-2, the C-1 permitted a wide variety of commercial uses by right, and multi-family projects became conditional uses. Some of the permitted commercial uses were retail sales, banks, restaurants (excluding drive- thrus), cocktail lounges, barber and beauty shops. In addition to multi-family dwellings, the list of conditional uses included such uses as churches, hotels, hospitals, office buildings, recreational facilities, and service stations. Structures were permitted to a height of 35', with greater height allowed as a conditional use (no maximum limit specified). The building setbacks were as follows: 10' front and side street, 0' interior side, and 10' rear. In approximately 1977, the C-1 district was eliminated, and the property was rezoned GC, General Commercial (also along with the west half of Block 77). The GC district allowed a greater variety of commercial uses than the C-1 district, including drive-thru restaurants, movie theaters, and offices as a permitted rather than conditional use. Additional conditional uses included car washes and oil change facilities, amusement game establishments, storage buildings, and veterinary clinics. Structures were permitted to a height of 45', and building setbacks were as follows: 10' front and side street, 0' interior side, and 10' rear. In February of 1988 Block 69 was included within the newly formed Old School Square Historic District, which generally included properties within the area from NE 4th Street to SE 2nd Street, from NE and SE 1st Avenues to NW and SW 1st Avenues. The underlying zoning districts did not change with this action, including the GC zoning on Block 69. However, the designation of the area as a historic district meant that any exterior changes to properties located within the district had to be approved by the Historic Preservation Board. HPB Staff Report LDR Amendment—Block 69 in OSSHAD Page 3 In 1990 with the Citywide rezonings, the OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) zoning district was created and applied to properties located within the historic district, including Block 69 (the western half of Block 77 was rezoned CBD). The OSSHAD zoning was, and continues to be, a district that provides for mixed uses of residential, office, and commercial activities, and promotes the restoration and reuse of existing structures. Permitted uses include single family and duplex dwellings, offices, retail shops, restaurants, arts related businesses, training and vocational schools, libraries and museums, barber and beauty shops, and bed and breakfast inns. Allowed as conditional uses are multi-family dwellings in a mixed-use structure, outdoor dining, various types of residential care facilities (i.e. Adult Congregate Living Facilities, alcohol and drug abuse treatment facilities, nursing homes), parking lots not associated with a use (i.e. public parking), and residential inns. Structures within the district are permitted to a height of 35', and building setbacks are as follows: 25' front, 15' side street, 7.5' interior side, and 10' rear. There are, however, several lots located within OSSHAD that may be developed in accordance with the permitted uses and development standards of the CBD. These lots, which are identified in Exhibit B, include the blocks fronting on Atlantic Avenue on either side of Swinton Avenue (excluding the Old School Square complex), the Neal Farms Market property, and the east half of Block 76 across from Old School Square. These lots were so identified because their existing or potential uses and/or development pattern were more typical of the CBD than OSSHAD zoning. The effect of the proposed amendment would be to add a portion of Block 69 to the list of properties that can be developed pursuant to certain CBD standards. These lots are located on the west side of SE 1st Avenue, between the two east/west alleys that exist within this block. The proposed changes would increase the types of permitted uses that could be established in the district, and allow more permissive development standards, as provided in the following table. Comparison of Development Standards for CBD and OSSHAD MINIMUM SETBACKS MAXIMUM HEIGHT LOT LOT LOT LOT FRONT SIDE SIDE REAR LOT SIZE WIDTH DEPTH FRONTAGE COVERAGE (ft.) STREET INTERIOR (ft.) (ft.) (sq.ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) CBD 0 0 0 0 (1) 10 10 0/(2) 10 48 OSSHAD 8,000 80 100 80 40%(3) 25 15 7 1/2 10 35 (1) refer to individual district regulations (10% non-vehicular open space required) (2) When there is no dedicated access to the rear of a structure, a 10' side yard setback shall be provided (3) In addition, a minimum of 25% non-vehicular open space is required As previously noted, the main reason for requesting the amendment is to allow for the construction of a parking garage that will allow a combination of public parking and I~ .• HPB Staff Report LDR Amendment—Block 69 in OSSHAD Page 4 parking for the GRIP office building located on the southeast corner of Atlantic and SE 1st Avenues. This garage will be constructed by the developers of the Worthing Place apartment complex at their expense, and will be deeded over to the City upon completion. While the OSSHAD district lists "parking lots not associated with a use" as a conditional use, it does not specifically state that parking garages are permitted. Additionally, a variance to the 25' minimum front setback would be required. The CBD regulations specifically list "parking garages" as a permitted use, and allow 10' front and 0' side interior setbacks. The amendment will: • Allow development that is of similar type and intensity to the CBD • Allow residential densities of up to 30 units per acre • Allow building heights of up to 48' The amendment will not: • allow the same conditional uses that are allowed in the CBD, including increases in density beyond 30 units per acre • allow increases in height up to 60' via conditional use approval • exempt development from review by the HPB. As noted, there are three primary and three accessory structures located on the subject lots. As currently proposed, construction of the garage would be on Lots 20-22 and would require the removal of the 1949 vernacular structure and accessory structure. There is a possibility that additional property could be incorporated into the proposal, however, no action has as yet been taken to that effect. Permitting these lots to be developed pursuant to CBD standards, but still subject to review and approval by the HPB, will allow for a transition between the more intense development that is probable within the CBD to the east, and the lower scale development along Swinton Avenue. In addition, it will allow for the construction of a private/public parking garage in a location that will help satisfy the parking demands of the adjacent 4-story office building, Old School Square, nearby restaurants, and various other commercial establishments in the area. The garage is an important component of the Worthing Place project, a mixed use development that will help fulfill the need for year-round residents in the downtown area. In this regard, the amendment will help to fulfill the following policies of the Comprehensive Plan: Future Land Use Element, Policy C-3.2 The successful development of the Old School Square Project is the cornerstone to the rebirth of the economic vitality of the community. To further accommodate this activity, the City shall evaluate the potential for the acquisition of land in the Old School Square area of the City for the purpose of improving public parking and/or creating a linkage between Old School Square and governmental facilities to the west. a- HPB Staff Report LDR Amendment—Block 69 in OSSHAD Page 5 Future Land Use Element, Policy C-4.1 The Central Business District (CBD) Zoning District regulations shall facilitate and encourage rehabilitation and revitalization and shall, at a minimum, address the following: o deletion of inappropriate uses o incentives for locating retail on the ground floor with office and residential use on upper floors o accommodating parking needs through innovative actions o incentives for dinner theaters, playhouses, and other family oriented activities o allowing and facilitating outdoor cafes o incentives for mixed use development and rehabilitations o elimination of side yard setback requirements o allow structural overhang encroachments into required yard areas. ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION The proposed amendment would add OSSHAD-zoned Lots 19-24, Block 69 to the list of lots that can be developed pursuant to the permitted uses and development standards of the CBD zoning district. From 1972 through most of 1990, these lots were zoned to allow for a variety of commercial uses similar to the CBD, with the same setback requirements. The block immediately to the east has been proposed for redevelopment as a residential/commercial complex. Even if the current Worthing Place proposal is not approved, it is likely that the intensity of development on Block 77 will increase significantly. Development of the eastern half of Block 69 pursuant to CBD standards, but still subject to HPB review and approval, will allow for an appropriate transition between the CBD-zoned parcels and development along Swinton Avenue, with the north/south alley effectively acting as a zoning district separator. The amendment will serve a public purpose by allowing the construction of a parking garage to meet the demands of uses in the downtown area, and is consistent with policies of the Comprehensive Plan. REVIEW BY OTHERS * The proposed amendment was reviewed by the Downtown Development Authority on October 20, 1999. There was not a quorum at the meeting, however, the three members present indicated their support of the amendment. The amendment was reviewed by the Community Redevelopment Agency on October 28, 1999. The Board unanimously recommended approval of the amendment. HPB Staff Report LDR Amendment—Block 69 in OSSHAD Page 6 RECOMMENDATION By motion, recommend approval of the proposed amendment to LDR Section 4.4.24 Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD), subsections (B) Permitted Uses and (F) Development Standards, as attached. Attachments: • Proposed Amendment • Exhibit A: Portion of Block 69 • Exhibit B: OSSHAD Lots Subject to CBD Regulations File/s/pz/hpb/Amendment for Block 69 PROPOSED LDR AMENDMENT FOR BLOCK 69 LDR Section 4.4.24—OSSHAD Zoning District Regulations (B) Principal Uses and Structures Allowed (9) Within the following described areas, the uses allowed as permitted uses in Section 4.4.13(B) pursuant to the base district and special provisions of the Central Business District regulations shall also be allowed in the OSSHAD: (a) Lots 13-16, Block 60 (b) Lots 1-4, Block 61 (c) Lots 1-7 and 19-24, Block 69 (d) Lots 7-8, Block 75 (e) Lots 1-6, Block 75 (F) Development Standards: (1) The following locations shall be subject to the standards of the CBD Zone District: (a) Lots 13-16, Block 60. (b) Lots 1-4, Block 61 (c) Lots 1-7 and 19-24, Block 69 (d) Lots 7-8, Block 75 • (e) Lots 1-6, Block 75 . . ATLANTIC • AVENUE 1111EL 0 IN Ea —1 tsst L07 24 1919 N LJ • L 23 0T 22 zy/f_ik CJCU ��ko77 j0T 2 N � z_ .0 Ell LOi ?° 1949 LiJ U) 'Us Cr) U) ❑ LOT 1, 1925 E'1` rv� S. E. 1ST ST. LDR TEXT AMENDMENT PORTION OF BLOCK 69 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL RASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM404 . . , J J.____. N E TH SI 1111 B_vct_• I CA t ZBOY SCOUT TRINITY Z . . 5TH >-, _LUTHCRANI'Om;(PHUTC R x --CHILD O V 1 l C F N ` ----_? -- (ACARE L ----CENTER— �I0 A R 0A D (N.W. 4TH ST.) Ll -- - — cT—._ — —� —_ POST — CASON OFFICE _ ' _ — — — — — METHODIST -- — _ — ILI r-- -- -- -- -- -- --- - CHURCH — _ •- 3_._-- -_ I - -- _ 15---- — — 1 -- — — —f • D - - 1— � u 1 1 __— N.W_—. 1� 2<. 1 NIE.9 3RD - I ST. _ I — w — y; Z -- —' C F CITY taJ s 6 z — ATTORNEY _ ^ —_ IIRFF Z BUILDING Q! I �' -- x F - — e. 13 19'20' 1 — —. MARTIN LUTHER KING 4. DRIVE t—_ .W. ND ST. 2ND ST. I iihi Z--• ,1 — It O co CITY ,1� , ._____F_— c 3 HALL o Z N.W. 1ST ,J 1ST] — Cl ' — --i= 1 6 / LL ST. F COTY• STTION �� JJ /'1 jC FI TENNIS OLD —-w STADIUM OW SCHOOL r SQUARE a® I I z . i -=Z[ Z i. • J N0. 7 G C ATLANTIC �� AVENUE kN\ \ 0 . H I POLICE SOUTH �— COMPLEX COUNTY -- -. COURT NA m _ r HOUSE ® E I m , < u W < Q 15 116 ,16 S.W. 1ST c -' S.W. 1ST , ST. S.E. ST. ` ' 1 Zry i I 'ti o BUDS z_ 2 1IlliY! 11=tiif r - - L— —L 3-- — — • 1n 1N��N i S.W. 2ND ST. .E. a2ND ST. D o— o D] D] —N y .—_ - 3_ - 3y — Li m 1 N _H N OSSHAD LOTS SUBJECT TO C.B.D. REGULATIONS --1— r r r r r.'r_E -OLD SCHOOL SQUARE HISTORIC ARTS DISTRICT(OSSHAD) CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL ® -EXISTING LOTS 1A -PROPOSED LOTS /o`g -BLOCK NUMBER 19-LOT NUMBER PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LMA122 DELRAI'BEACH biebi All-America City 11lir AGENDA 1993 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: November 17, 1999 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286.0105. I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • November 3, 1999 III. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS A. Variance 62: 305 NE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District. Keith Spina, Authorized Agent and Architect. Consider Granting Variances from the Land Development Regulations; Section 4.3.4(K) Pertaining to North and South Side Interior Setback Requirements. IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. COA-399: Silberstein Office Building, 219 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Jeff Silberstein, Owner. Consider Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Design Elements Associated with the Conversion of a Single Family Residence to an Office. B. COA-111-Continua on: Michael Weiner Law Office Building, 102 North Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Consider the Renovation and Enclosure of an Existing Screened Front Porch. HPB Meeting November 17, 1999 Page 2 C. COA-400, McKeever Residence, 255 N. Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Bruce and Cathy McKeever, Owners. Consider Landscape and Paving Plans for a Single Family Residence. • V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Reports from Historic District Representatives B. Board Members C. Staff VI. ADJOURN Pat Cayce Historic Preservation Planner POSTED ON: November 12, 1999 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 17, 1999 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson at 6:00 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Hurlburt, Tony Keller, Dave Bodker (left 6:45), Mary Lou Jamison, John Johnson, Gail-Lee McDermott MEMBERS ABSENT: Shane Ames STAFF PRESENT: Pat Cayce, Diana Mund, Jay Jambeck (Assistant City Attorney) II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The Minutes for the Regular Meeting of November 3, 1999 were before the Board for consideration. Mr. Keller moved to approve the Minutes as presented. The motion was seconded by Ms. Jamison and passed 6-0. Mrs. Cayce requested the agenda be amended to add Item V.A. The Board was of the consensus to do so. As the applicant for Item III.A. had not yet arrived, the Board heard Item IV.A. first. IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: A. COA 99-399: Silberstein Office Building, 219 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Jeff Silberstein, Owner. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering a COA which incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal: • Class III Site Plan Modification • Landscape Plan • Design Elements It was moved by Mr. Bodker, seconded by Mr. Keller and passed 6-1(Johnson dissenting) to approve COA 99-399 for the Site Plan, based upon positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards) of the Land Development Regulations, policies of the Comprehensive Plan and Section 2.4.5(F)(5), with the condition that a bike rack be installed on the property. It was moved by Mr. Keller, seconded by Ms. Jamison and passed 6-0 to approve COA 99-399 for the Landscape Plan as presented, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16. It was moved by Mr. Keller, seconded by Ms. Jamison and passed 5-1 (Johnson dissenting) to approve COA 99-399 for the Design Elements, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Bankers' Row Master Development Plan, with the following conditions: 1. That on the front (west) elevation the full length windows and front door be made of wood; 2. That the 2 sash windows on the front elevation be made of wood with true divided lights; and, 3. That all shutters are mounted in a manner to appear as if they are operable. At this point on the agenda the applicant for Item III.A. arrived at the meeting. III. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: A. Variance 99-62 & COA 99-395: 305 NE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District. Keith Spina, Authorized Agent/Architect. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering a variance pertaining to the north and south side interior setback requirements and a COA associated with the design elements. Chairperson Hurlburt stated that this was a Quasi-Judicial item. Therefore, anyone wishing to speak on this item would have to be sworn in. Board Secretary Diana Mund asked that anyone wishing to speak raise their right hand and then administered the oath. Chairperson Hurlburt declared the Public Hearing open, as there was no one wishing to speak the Public Hearing was closed. It was moved by Ms. Jamison, seconded by Mr. Keller and passed 6-0 to approve Variance 99-62, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(J)(1) to grant the following variances: -2- HPB Minutes 11/17/99 1. To reduce the south side interior setback to 8', to allow the utility shed to be constructed; and, 2. To reduce the north side interior setback to 5' to allow the shower enclosure to be constructed. It was moved by Ms. Jamison, seconded by Mr. Keller and passed 6-0 to approve COA 99-395 for the Design Elements as presented, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E), for the shed and shower enclosure. At this point on the agenda Mr. Bodker left the meeting. IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: B. COA 111 Continuation: Michael Weiner Law Office Building, 102 N. Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Michael Weiner, Owner. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering a COA for the renovation and enclosure of an existing front porch. It was moved by Mr. Keller, seconded by Ms. Jamison and passed 5-0 to approve COA 111 Continuation as presented, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Illustrated Guidelines, for the porch rehabilitation and enclosure. C. COA 99-400: McKeever Residence, 255 N. Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Bruce & Cathy McKeever, Owners. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of considering a COA for landscaping and paving associated with a contributing single-family residence. It was moved by Mr. Keller, seconded by Ms. Jamison and passed 5-0 to approve COA 99-400, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E), for the landscaping plan, paving plan, and wood privacy fence (painted white) to be installed in the rear yard, with the following condition: • That the site plan will be modified to eliminate the rear yard turning area. V. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS: A. Recommendation to the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board with respect to adding a second show-window to the east elevation (NE 2nd Avenue) for the Cathcart building (Accents & Decor). -3- HPB Minutes 11/17/99 Based on the historical significance of the Cathcart building, the Board felt that to alter the east elevation by the addition of a second show-window, which never existed, was inappropriate, historically incorrect, and therefore did not support its installation. If the applicant wishes to give the east elevation more appeal it would be appropriate to restore the windows to the openings, which have been blocked in. VI. REPORTS AND COMMENTS: A. Reports from Historic District Representatives None B. Board Members Ms. Jamison inquired if it would be appropriate to include the Atlantic Avenue Bridge as well as Veterans Park in the Marina Historic District, and if there was anything being done about designating the 8th Street Bridge. C. Staff Mrs. Cayce informed the Board that Castle Florida Construction and Dittman Federspiel would be appealing the Board's decision on their shutters, at the City Commission's December 7th meeting. She asked that Mr. Keller be present at the meeting as he was acting Chairman when the Board made their decision. VII. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business before the Board, Mr. Keller moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:20 P.M., seconded by Ms. Jamison and passed 5-0. The undersigned is the Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for November 17, 1999, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on December 1, 1999. Diana Mlund If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. -4- HPB Minutes 11/17/99 H I S TOR I C �PRESERVATION, BOO A R D `` STAFF REPORT Project Name: Variance 62 and COA-395 Bryant Residence Project Location: 305 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District ITEM= ''BE"F-O;RETHE" The action requested of the Board is that of granting variances to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), pertaining to the side interior setback requirements for property located in the R-1-AA (Single Family Residential) zoning district; and approval of the associated design elements. BACKGROUND x The HPB approved renovations to the Bryant Residence and the construction of a carport at its meeting of October 20, 1999. Shown on the plans but not considered at that meeting were a shower enclosure to the north of the swimming pool and a rebuilt utility shed on the southwest corner of the residence. Both of these items require a variance to the 10' side interior setback requirement and are now before the Board. PROJECT DE.S;CRIPTION /,ANALYSIS . VARIANCES AND DESIGN ELEMENTS The residence is nonconforming with respect to the north and south side interior setbacks. The required side interior setback in the R-1-AA zoning district is 10'. From the south property line: The request is to reduce the south side setback to eight feet where ten feet is required. If granted, the variance will allow a wooden utility shed to be reconstructed. The length of the shed is 8'. There is an existing utility shed on the site where the new one will be built. It is in very poor condition but cannot be rebuilt due to its nonconforming location, which is 8' 7" from the property line, where 10' is required. The proposed shed is 8' x 8' and will be attached to the west wall of the residence which is set back 8.7" from the south property line. It will be constructed of wood with clapboard siding to match the residence. A secondary gable roof finished to match the main house will be installed. Double doors will open to the south. The utility shed houses the existing sprinkler valves and a hot water heater. Meeting Date: November 17, 1999 Agenda Item: Ill-A HPB Staff Report Variance-62 Page 2 From the north property line: The request is to reduce the north side setback to five feet where ten feet is required. If granted, the variance will allow a wooden shower enclosure, associated with an existing swimming pool, to be constructed five feet from the north property line. The length of the shower enclosure will be 5'8", and the height will be 5'. The shower enclosure will be located to the north of the existing swimming pool and approximately 10' from the northeast corner of the house. The north side of the residence is setback 4'6" from the north property line. The enclosure is 5'8" x 5'8" with a door to the west. It will be constructed of clapboard to match the residence and is roofless. The shed and the shower enclosure will be painted white to match the residence. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(J) Historic Preservation Board to Act on Variance Requests: the Board is guided by the following criteria. (1) That a variance is necessary to maintain the historic character of property through demonstrating that: (a) A variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare. (b) Special conditions and circumstances exist, because of the historic setting, location, nature, or character of the land, structure, appurtenance, sign, or building involved, which are not applicable to other lands, structures, appurtenances, signs or buildings in the same zoning district, which have not been designated as historic sites or a historic district nor listed in the Local Register of Historic Places. (c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of existing ordinances would alter the historic character of the historic district, or historic site to such an extent that it would not be feasible to preserve the historic character, of the historic district or historic site.' (d) The variance requested is the minimum necessary to preserve the historic character of a historic site or of a historic district. The subject property is located in the Marina Historic District, and is legally described as follows: Lots 3 and the north 20 feet of Lot 4, Block 128, Blank-Nichols subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book 13, Page 28 of the Public Records of Palm Beach county, Florida. HPB Staff Report Variance-62 Page 3 The variances will not be contrary to the public interest, safety or welfare. As the dilapidated utility shed on the south already exists, reconstructing it will be an asset to the property. The existing residence is 4'6" from the north property line, constructing the new shower enclosure 5' from the property line will have little impact on the property to the north. This property is located on the Intracoastal Waterway where due to • escalating land values, a residence of this size is often considered a "tear down". The Marina Historic District will benefit from having this house "saved" and renovated to reflect modern amenities, as opposed to demolition and new construction. ALT;ERNATI.VE ACTION;,SN VARIANCES 1. Deny, with reasons stated. 2. Approve as presented. DESIGN ELEMENTS 1. Continue with direction. 2. Deny, with reasons stated. 3. Approve as presented. RECOMMENDATION By separate motion: 1. Based on positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(J)(1), ❑ Grant the variance to reduce the south side interior setback to 8', to allow the utility shed to be constructed; and, ❑ Grant the variance to reduce the north side interior setback to 5' to allow the shower enclosure to be constructed. 2. Based on positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(E) approve the design elements for the utility shed and the shower enclosure as presented. File/s/hpb/Bryant-variance-62sr '.tt • ..,1I t . a.se via .- --- It.,.l N +li pft.—.,= is j=t-I � ` I : E ii vil F. t L RIt I I ___� \jL _ 11 li 1 RH_____._7---.....m_ri- . .r`_.- I . ` "» <T.t• �« � .. w< I O SITE rum / ROOF FLAN ti " ! i — i moils 11,1 O t .. ...< .<.ro n�w..n .rv.v.....x w"».t r» .� f"'1- �W+ T 4 �� sly 9f- IL< .ef,n,,,". _=_ 9 OWER EttMI.OSURE Z ^o 1IMXIIIM_MlL, twy 1 I O Ov..t. t tJ ) .w.n nor t.m.r.vn.t<. ..n.".•t y 4. V1• .1� , N COG W lid • .LLtM 7:4:yl..tJrf.....'"""''''''M • Vli. I I —�' ~r...•w i l �;[77 } .1».>'Tr.navi LA n'.:.mmn':e�- tn.. _-. .-_ -_—. I' ............ ..t... '•!. ` • !:.5.�%:�",„',.^:!,„;".`Y.`�S".:,.,.;. ... we.tonne Wit'.,.— ''�,', -- yLcnw R:a' ^•.'..,"":.;"..'»°.`..e..�.�"{R'S:Iy --F .. .... O f ARNNG CA170!'T i T : n o ry U I f --1 = _4e6 't• ,•t.• t n I t SITE FLMUtZOOF PLAN- I-I-i CI - 1 �~"..®'• ". e „�," DEMOLITION PLAN - „,vgx.c,ro,r"..""^," ,{'II}-�,,■■ ODETIOLITION FLOOR f'LNI __. ._ A-1 t _ ..1 VAR.to.ta Moll Tii N01L0 _— _ •_ Min Mi.wENIM__I hi !. . . rrt I I. • ' • r1Ew ASr1IALI SIIIIGI E Roor OVER 30t1, 1140 1(11 IIIIAGGED.COLOR.A11D STILE ro TIArcrt EXISTI IG F'.EIIOVE OW F 5/6'COX rowooir SIIEATIIRIG NEW 5I1)11G. rASCIA HEW ASPI IALT IIAI.ED WI111 Sd FIATS AI 4'G.C. Allil SorrlT To 1 COLOR NIP S Al EDGES AIM AT 6'G.G.II TIAMGl1 EXI51111G }l FIELD Al ALL ROOT 511EA1I111G t HEW ROor to I _ TrtI2 /_7.77. i •--IT'r I — - EXISf. WOW STRAP OW' '/ TOP AT EAGII RAF1EP. SR1rSOr1 LU-76 — I— \ -`—— Joist-SEAr-Ar'ERT..Irr.Arirp• I — 10 RIDGE BEAM(EACH SIDE) �— CONT.(2) 2x8 RIDGE DEAR TO - EXIST. 1)LQo1 DEAR AT EAGI EIID, I AHD TRIMSiirSOti MIS IS STRAP TO 1'-0' {I - (RAMC AT MEW WALL ADD SET ' I II DUCI(Er SEAT Al EXISIII(: ,I - --- }I I \ I WALL (FELD VERITY EXISIIIG- - ` MY,111111'i ULI)G t \_NEW GOUT:. SIOC)r COIIUI11OII) 1 1 2x6 RAFTERS AT 24•C.C. 5/6'COX rirwoon SHEAIIIIIG (2)2x4 tor PLATE W1111 SIIPSOII LT5-12 STRAP AIICIIOR AT EAGI P..Ar1ER • SIP.AP AIICIIOP.EACII STUD TO tor . RATE W/ Sirsoit S1-4 SlP.Ar In 2x4 WOOD STUDS AT 16'C.O. 1 1/2'CD%r'LYWOOD SIIEAIIIIIG ► —� MAILED Will Sd MAILS AT 6'G.C. `t'i AT EDGES AHD AT 12'O.C.It J FIELD AT ALL WALL SIIEATIIIIG WOOD 511/116 tO 11AtCIl E)151116 I I I I MOOD Mtn TO ITCroi OVER DLILDIIG rArER —` I I I� .❑CSTO rem t1IX$L ITTJI O COlii.r.T.2x4 SILL AIICIIORED TO SLAD W/ in J 111 3' IAPGOIIS AT 12'O.G. AIID SIPSoti ETA-I2 EMBEDDED II SLAD Al EAGII S1UD I I COW.P.T. Ix3 HAILER 1 I I L I \ 1. GARIG. SLAD WITH 6x6 WI.4/WI.4 I I Ii W.W./1.OVCR a IIL VI5dllfrtl VAPOR I - F BARRIER OVER IERIIIC IF.EATCU Y' COMPACTED FLL CO .lir HorloUllIG rooulG - L I SEE FOUIIDAt1011 rinti ;4, \ . SECTION 0 SHOWER. ENCLOSURE \ • • SCALE, 3/8'=1'-O' • • • SECTION NEW UTILITY BLDG .. I ) / , • -, I , ! "i l___II , I I I I , i , A T L A. N T I C AVENUE _ !//•• _, I I != / COIALH f r r", t II I I II 1 I �. I C 5• I ;I -H I I I � - I i j r--�- i . <, I_ Li" I Ir-- uj� li • I BAR/ I /HARBOJP//■ I I <t )<l I ICONDOIj ` I� J S.E IS Si. STREE1 111 MIRANIAP. n 1 I IrI -I ( I I 1 I 1 I� li i f I j eUD'S I ry r 1 I I. �� j �; I'Ij -t I j�L'—_tD I 1 KI DCEAI^ I vi i`li 11 —J - Ci JD II li' 4' I I coarr I� I 1 l J IN LI GRAN AN S.E. 2NG ST. j . .Nu- I I I I nl I I I I i i C 1 i!I a 1 G_EAN I I nl rJ: , L_, i^ SE AGATE I I o:w+ tcna. �t 111 1 1 � I TOvI�P.S I I T 1 1111 : 11 —; 1 1/ 1I f I it 1 I I I I I I 'N.AISIs A U 'S -; 1 �I 1- I I I I I , I I I u I .-I . Iti1 I --I , i 1 I , II ti I I I i I j 1 '^j —I- I l S.E.- 3`- ST. 1 1 I ^I I I_I � I I I` i 15AY IS=_" I I t I I I �;z(I zI ' • io1 i _Ar,'I+_nI _ I j�m _ I I Y_ wI I I I- ,C ! LANCER WAY ..0..,.. j lI I 1--ID 1 1z I wi �1w1 I IW1 I_ h 1 [w'I IN ^'1NI I� I I 1 I 1 1 J� l_I J I. I I I 1 ' l l i Ji S.E. 4Tr ST. I SEA GA IL ASJARINA =Jti MANOP, r :' I { 1 n (1! !I` /////// III 1 1 1 I 1 1 u1 J BF CHY I %/// S.E. STH ST. BUCIDA w RD. . 1 I I I I WOMtNS CLUB Ills' I i.,L, t wt < 1; J< IL''' 1N I NIL 6TH ST. M-_ALEUCA RD. c/ I I I i BARTON c WI 4; I Iw ,- = APT y �/ < <1 I<I I It IF- CONDOS I 1 1 I o7 CAFass4 U 1 1 In 1 n1 1---1 i I I Iz, CHURCHILL RD 1 I W CONDO I '�� h1 I ,<, 1----IDj I N TAMARIND RD. S.E. I 7TH I. , i I C ; I I I o I n 1 1, ,..... I ,1 <<I ; OI <, i C_ I I I F I CA i.i. !CA BANf� - nv �vl� fn N1 IN ILJ bth7 1 1U p I IBUDDING1U I I - S.E.E ,----',,I TH STD I ( I EA HINT I I I �{ (-1 ( 1 N '-immir— 305 S.E. 7TH AVENUE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. EL PLANNING E.: ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAD REF: LM2E2 -'_,mmr HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD .ITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: November 17, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: !V.A. ITEM: Consideration of COA-399 which incorporates a Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Design Elements Associated with the Conversion of a Single Family Residence into an Office (Silberstein Office Building), Located at 219 N.E. 1st Avenue. .p I . I C N.E. 5TH CT 2/��- 44�LJ • TRINITY , N.E. 5TH ST. LUTHERAN z_ • (N.W. 4TH ST.) ' N.E. 4TH. ST. • POST CASON OFFICE GENERAL DATA: METHODIST W CHURCH D Z Owner/Applicant Silberstein Architects International — w a a _ > iigent Jeff Silberstein a =cation East side of N.E. 1st Avenue, N.W. 3RD ST. N.E. 3RD ST. approximately 1,540' North of EN Atlantic Avenue - im mil I Property Size 0.169 Acre ow • Future Land Use Map Other Mixed Use '-Qz Current Zoning OSSHAD (Old School Square I "��,, E_ Historic Arts District) IN NE Adjacent Zoning....North: OSSHAD �.N.W. 2ND ST. N.E. _AND ST. Z _ East: CBD (Central Business District) 0 3 South: OSSHAD Z West: OSSHAD - Existing Land Use Single Family Residence N z Proposed Land Use Change of use from residential to N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST ST. office with associated parking and ' 3 landscaping. Z Water Service Existing on site 1 - z- Sewer Service Existing on site ! . F=1/11:OLD SCHOOL • SQUARE I I I III 1 A T L A N TIC AVENUE 1 w-- _— _I N . IV.A. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is that of COA-399, which incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for 219 NE 1st Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(1)(b): • ❑ Class Ill Site Plan Modification; o Landscape Plan; and o Design Elements. The property is located on the east side of NE 1st Avenue between NE 2nd Street and NE 3rd Street, within the Banker's Row area of the Old School Square Historic District. BACKGROUND3 The site consists of the south 22 feet of Lot 7, and the north 33.5 feet of Lot 8, Block 74, the Town of Delray, Florida (originally the Town of Linton) and is zoned OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District). The property contains a 1,062 sq. ft. single-family house which was constructed in 1938. The structure is currently being utilized as a residence. The request now before the Board is approval to allow the conversion of the existing single family dwelling to professional offices. PROJECT DESCRIPTION . The development proposal involves the following: o Conversion of the existing 1,062 sq.ft. single family residence into professional offices; o Addition of front and rear porches; o Installation of 4 parking spaces (2 standard, 1 compact and 1 handicapped accessible) within a proposed parking area on the east side of the property; o Installation of landscaping, walkways and a refuse container area; o Installation of a picket fence. SITE' PLAN MODIFICATION ANALYSIS' COMPLIANCE WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS The body taking final action on the site and development application/request shall specifically address items identified in the Land Development Regulations. • HPB Staff Report 219 NE 1st Avenue—COA Page 2 LDR Section 4.3.4(K) (Development Matrix): Open Space Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), 25% non-vehicular open space is required within the OSSHAD zoning district. The proposal exceeds the requirement with 56.4% open • space. Setbacks Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), the required building setbacks for the OSSHAD zoning district are: 25' front, 7.5' side-interior and 10' rear. The covered porch additions in the front and rear of the structure is setback 25'1" from the west property line (front) along N.E. 1st Avenue and 67'3" from the east property line (rear). The existing structure is setback 4'11" from the north property line (interior side) and is non-conforming as it encroaches by 2'5", while the structure is setback 10'5" from the south property line (interior side). Based upon the above, the requirements of the OSSHAD zoning district have been met. LDR Sections 4.4.24 (G) (OSSHAD Zone District Regulations): Parking Requirements Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(1), parcels located along N.E. 1st Avenue between N.E. 2"d Street and N.E. 3rd Street (Banker's Row) shall comply with either provisions of Article 4.6 of the Land Development Regulations, or provisions of the Banker's Row Development Plan, whichever is more permissive. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(4)(a), within the OSSHAD zoning district, business and professional offices shall provide 1 parking space for 300 sq.ft. of floor area. Based upon the above, the conversion of the 1,062 sq. ft. single family residence to professional office requires 4 parking spaces. Four parking spaces are proposed in the rear of the property taking access off of the existing paved alley (2 standard, 1 compact and 1 handicapped accessible), which meets the requirement. The subject property is located within Banker's Row, the Banker's Row Plan accommodates street improvements and public parking to encourage the conversion of these residential properties to commercial uses without providing all the required parking on-site. However, all parking will be provided on site and any overflow parking can be accommodated within the public parking lot on the northwest corner of NE 2"d Street and NE 1st Avenue as well as on-street public parallel parking spaces along NE 1st Avenue. Site Lighting: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.8 (Lighting), lighting is required for new development proposals. Two proposed floodlights are to be mounted in the existing Seagrape tree in the rear of the property. The decorative lamppost in the front of the property is to be removed. In the peaks of the proposed front and rear porches, hanging light fixtures are • HPB Staff Report 219 NE 1st Avenue—COA Page 3 proposed. In addition, a decorative lamppost exists in front of the property within the NE 1st Avenue streetscape. Bike Rack: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(C)(1)(c)(3), bicycle parking facilities shall be provided by • a fixed or stationary bike rack for any non-residential use within the City's TCEA. The subject property is located within the TCEA area, and a bike rack has not been provided for each lot. Therefore, this requirement has been attached as a condition of approval. Sidewalks: Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.3(B)(1), a 5' wide sidewalk is required within the rights-of- way adjacent to the property. With the Banker's Row streetscape improvements a 5' paver brick sidewalk was installed and currently exists along NE 1st Avenue along the front of the property. In addition, the proposal includes a 4' paver brick pedestrian connection to the existing NE 1st Avenue sidewalk. LANDSCAPE PLAN: ANALYSIS Landscaping currently exists on site. An existing Royal Poinciana tree and two Queen Palms are to be retained on the west side (front) of the property. The existing Mango tree, Citrus tree, and Black Olive tree are to be retained on the east side (rear) of the property. In addition, three Coconut Palms are to be planted in the rear yard. The foundation plantings in the rear of the structure include Simpson Stopper, Crinum Lily, and Coontie. An Oleander tree will be installed at the southeast corner of the structure. A King Sago and a Robellini Palm will be underplanted with Crinum Lily, Trinette, Pentas, and Xanadu in the front of the structure. Within the proposed parking area, a landscape island will be provided where the existing Seagrape tree exists. A Gumbo Limbo tree will be installed within the perimeter landscaped area on the north side of the handicapped parking space. The existing Black Olive tree and proposed Gumbo Limbo trees will be underplanted with Ilex. The proposed landscaping in combination with the existing landscaping will be an enhancement to the property, yet will not distract from the historical significance of the structure. DESIGN ELEMENTS ANALYSIS The major exterior design change is the addition of a front and rear porch. Front (west) Elevation: The front porch addition is 5' wide and 18.5' long. It will be covered by a secondary gable roof, which will be supported by 4 wood columns and a wood railing with balusters will be installed between the columns. The existing glass jalousie windows will be t • HPB Staff Report 219 NE 1st Avenue—COA Page 4 replaced with fixed full length, single pane, factory finished white aluminum hurricane rated windows. The front door will remain in its original location and will match the full- length windows. The windows to the north and south of the porch will be replaced with factory finished white single hung sash with applied muntins and will be hurricane rated. Decorative, inoperable, wall mounted louvered wood shutters are proposed for the sash windows. The window to the north is a double-hung window and window to the south is • a single-hung. Rear (east) Elevation: The rear porch addition is 10' wide and 19.8' in length. It will have a black canvas gable roof, which will be supported by 4 wood columns. The existing French doors will be replaced with single pane aluminum French doors and an additional full-length fixed pane window will be added on each side of the doors. There are 4 windows on the east elevation, all but the southern window will be removed, and the openings will be covered with clapboard siding to match existing. The remaining window will be factory finished white aluminum single hung sash with applied muntins. South and North Elevations: With the exception of replacing the existing windows with aluminum single hung sash, there are no changes to the south or north elevations. All of the existing wood siding will remain and will be repaired as necessary. All windows and doors will be aluminum and will be hurricane rated. The roof will be charcoal gray composition shingles. All shutters will be wood. The house will be painted pale salmon with white windows and doors and white shutters. The Banker's Row Development Plan states that additions to and alterations of the structures shall incorporate features appropriate to the style and the specific building. And that new work that is a contemporary interpretation of the style should not be discouraged. Like most of the Mackie cottages, the front porch of this house was inset under the main roof. Also like many of the cottages, this porch has been enclosed, in this case with glass jalousies. The Mackie cottages were constructed in the Minimal Traditional style, which lacks the exterior detailing of a true traditional style. The addition of a front porch with columns, balustrades and a secondary roof, with full-length windows to the rear of the porch, is a contemporary interpretation of the style and is appropriate as it reinforces the traditional elements found elsewhere on the building. However, the Banker's Row guidelines also state that replacement windows should be made of wood with true divided muntin bars. Therefore, staff suggests that, at the very least, the full-length windows and door to the rear of the front porch be made of wood as opposed to the proposed aluminum and that the 2 front windows be replaced with wood with true divided lights. As with previous proposals, staff has concerns with the wall mounted decorative shutters. The Design Guidelines state that shutters should always be attached to the window casing rather than the wall, and that, It is not strictly appropriate to use shutters HPB Staff Report 219 NE 151 Avenue—COA Page 5 for adjacent double windows. Staff recommends that all of the shutters be mounted with hinges on the window casings, and be 1/2 the width and full height of the window. If shutters are used on the double window on the north of the west (front) elevation, they should be made of 4 panels, 2 on each side and hinged to fold back on themselves when not in the closed position. Fence: A 3'4" white painted, cedar picket fence will be installed along the front property line and will extend to the front of the structure along the north and south property lines. RE Q U 1':R E.D F;Ix N D,1;N G S Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(1)(c)(Class Ill Site Plan Modification), a Class Ill site plan modification is a modification to a site plan which represents either a change in intensity of use, or which affects the spatial relationship among improvements on the land, requires partial review of Performance Standards found in LDR Sections 3.1.1 and 3.2.3, as well as required findings of LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(5). Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5 (G)(5) (Findings), with a Class Ill site plan modification formal findings under Section 3.1.1 are not required. However, a finding that the proposed changes do not significantly affect the originally approved plan must be made concurrent with approval of a Class Ill modification. Future Land Use Map: The use or structures must be allowed in the zone district and the zoning district must be consistent with the land use designation. The subject property has a Future Land Use Map Designation of Other Mixed Use and a zoning designation of OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District). Pursuant to Section 4.4.24(B)(2), business and professional offices are permitted uses within the OSSHAD zoning district. The OSSHAD zoning district is consistent with the Other Mixed Use Future Land Use Designation. Based Upon the above, a positive finding can be made. CONCURRENCY: Facilities which are provided by, or through, the City shall be provided to new development concurrent with issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. These facilities shall be provided pursuant to levels of service established within the Comprehensive Plan. There are no impacts on water and sewer demands, drainage or parks and recreation levels of service standards. Traffic: The existing residence generated 10 Average Daily Trips, and the conversion to office will generate 14 trips. The number of trips generated by the new use is insignificant and can be easily handled by the existing road network. Further, the subject property is HPB Staff Report 219 NE 1st Avenue—COA Page 6 located within the City's TCEA (Traffic Concurrency Exemption Area), which encompasses the CBD (Central Business District), OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) and the West Atlantic Avenue Business Corridor. The TCEA exempts the above described areas from complying with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. Solid Waste: The proposal calls for a conversion of a single family dwelling to professional offices. Trash generated each year by the proposed 1,062 sq.ft. office space will be 2.86 tons of solid waste per year [1,062 sq.ft. x 5.4 lbs. = 5,735 lbs/2,000 = 2.86 tons]. The trash generated by the single family home is 1.99 tons of solid waste per year. The increase in trash generation of .87 tons is negligible. The Solid Waste Authority has indicated that it has no objection to projects that generate less than 10 tons of solid waste per year. Therefore, a positive finding can be made to this Level of Service standard. REVIEW BY OTHERS Community Redevelopment Agency: At its meeting of October 14, 1999 the Community Redevelopment Agency reviewed and recommended approval of the development proposal. Neighborhood Notice: Special Notice was provided to the Old School Square Homeowner's Association. Letters of objection or support, if any, will be presented at the HPB meeting. ASSESSMENT The proposal involves the conversion of a single-family residence to professional offices for an architect. Improvements include installation of 4 parking spaces in the rear of the property, construction of porches in the front and rear of the property, installation of awnings, picket fence, and additional landscaping. With this project there will be no negative impacts with respect to traffic, solid waste, and parking. ALTERNATIVE `'ACTIONS ' 1. Continue with direction and concurrence. 2. Approve COA-399 and the associated site plan, landscape plan and design elements for 219 NE 1st Avenue, subject to conditions. 3. Deny approval of COA-399 and the associated site plan, landscape plan and design elements for 219 NE 1st Avenue, with the basis stated. • • HPB Staff Report 219 NE 1st Avenue—COA Page 7 RECOMME�N,DED ACTION A. Site Plan: Approve COA-399 for the site plan for 219 NE 1st Avenue, based upon positive • findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards) of the Land Development Regulations, policies of the Comprehensive Plan and Section 2.4.5(F)(5), subject to the following condition: 1. Install a bike rack on the property. B. Landscape Plan: Approve COA-399 for the landscape plan for 219 NE 1st Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16. C. Design Elements: Approve the Design Elements for 219 NE 1st Avenue, associated with COA-399 based on positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(E), the Design Guidelines and the Bankers Row Master Development Plan, recommend approval with the following conditions: 1. That on the front (west) elevation the full length windows and front door be made of wood; 2. That the 2 sash windows be,made of wood with true divided lights; and 3. That all shutters be--19-ingerlinnewirrclow casings. Attachments: • Site Plan • Landscape Plan • Elevations t o Urbane%Ard,keeb International twine,NJ.le/w. I PROJECT DATA e.aerf.Nae»t•N. LOT fCOM•-e.t tR-r etrell. /.t7.00 �'� MUM) 1 r.l., 121.771-91r7 iA ,r K-i' K I.., 1.1.171-•1f1 I— USE 7 mlvenlRrS, N me Ice 7-r' ,r-•. ,rx � ` InMt MOW. IIr.N NFM1 tftlC:VOX Ntm TtC 7-r• tr-rr e-,r w-t"- I navy 2 1 I LL--�as Ili' I P71oJECT SOME FOOTAGE'S, PARKINS RACES PROVIDED: IE 1.N re OF tie f -3:,�.5�.�.. �+y t I I �'OMU11CR MS 5 MD. . 'm op.IL R /Y~[0�1 WI WI [OIMC7, j Oa11% M bvM f!'OF IA 7 M 71[NMI Z~ fir VVV Ll 1,5 a IN L AMClot 7a N MOE 74 TOM.noel IIeN elf 4 R I7a O m ,r•elUirlm, 1 a v M OTT 0 NWT MOM(ew.tlT 1•..w-MOM Ne. iw.F W. for d Ne M 7A11 a ism*.5lIEkarma le M Nef,wi-MVO A.tN Mf w It fa a Mt TOOL MIO,f fMm, . ItIC Meer Cr es M M tree A •PCI INe•olro Mr,It We a leaf MO,ItNI MONO MOM ♦ M CUM M M Mal?MOT?N M I WIN Peer •M R. w d let PIE POW Mlal COWRY,MOM.•mM.O rr nt01N `'ii f 7Y'{AaBIN I 219 I OFFICE I IDELRAY BEACH,FL I t 1I r•Seer I ------ - - - - - - - -- tfuttolt W 0 it to I 11 in W yj Q y Mlle -: r 1f�' ^War tj me er ma,•�� eSAe '! ^r 1 % ir I 'a... O LOCATION MA! LJ ` I *w M en N{ �4 I 2 z 2 6 t I I � ] }*1 If•10`,IDe11O1 I � I N. .N1 EFEFIFFEIFFIl w. 11■1I',■511,9■ M11 1111 I •tarII } 1 _11111111L r : . i a • ><{ 1 r� —I traw �J y tzft REVISIONS: 1!•Je1„IIIII 111NE$ �►'rt�hewn , •11111111 NI 1Wl ' 4�I,e�7 _ _. '_ L� _�.�_�_��_,��_._�_�.— Tale:SITE PLAN COMO lerterarr /�J��y porreert um Dwg.no.:A-1 �+�O 1/2 MILE MCI NTY MAP O SITE PLAN Date: NOV.1,1999 LANDSCAPE DATA 11111M x WOYM DATA .116 • 1OTAL RTC AKA M.N M..$) ] >t t.V Y[pY[pY[p AMA ;Iwo �\(s yrMOls�) 'ISOor • N.RCOMP:1 wPaw 1 RC W JERRV TURNER R TOTAL•10la11.3A 1TARS & ASSOCIATES 1 P.M.TANTRUM DATA LANDSCAPE„�01ICTt 1/V PRAM M�G�pADNmff �Q PLANNING 1 MAX Pa=TNOS7J11 MU MOVRED IRO V D4I G ITAL DDa1 InCMRTY ■ 1Cin.P�R].pCr01 INMUM M.PROW. Iu F■■ TOTAL V/MI. 1 1W TO I).r�PROW. 1 MO IR DON Or WCI 1®P01Ke1•IPTRCR LA1OYM 90S A.CS P0AIPI),I ROAD e RAMA M C..P.OI MCI CrOLP000.2 .[101•PRAM WO!M N. sff t.t Y0e]+0011C °LPA 17110 RAIIKPURID AMAMIT AA oAl I )] iy.SL.VIM1C , c(■■ IUrM PMi DATA (Nall] �IP J tontm v 4 iiii ® 19) AL SO C Cr AIL WOW.MOM A IC AMC MR Cr ALL 0999 CURT MA..]O M MM Y ® i I k m iL• MAIM TARIM MM. MAIM PROWL. i M. PM 219 5 _ 117111.IMRO MIRIM A.O O•.10 CM.MU +„: OFFICE r PROMO,N .m . ,' M N.PRAM. ]re fr 6 ; m • J PLANTING NOTES: 1�p'. O /� ® W&OI M;Mot e,rodoo M mob,To Dr.Iri+dvd.b MN.u 1 s O. w i CRI L-11 .A I,w I,•peUw.M rtn.rd.AR MnC)f•+alt.Pert I.rebury IM0. © 1ti,_ �tal.e/na1Jq Dgr.lMt of AghIM.Tdd�sw.. arik tI 2 0 1�t / U N.e4 Mal A.do.son rm�l/llw of.]M-aM P••1•s Iwewa O.O,O_'' Gpane en.Md to 1 in 1 ® •:` o° ,�, C '/ / // /r. wee�.e psi••1]..•n.Ale�union.c+..r.»+.a 6 i� .o°o O ® ///��//, I ® N b�dcmo sw•Md M NdM to Pwtle.mMYnov.r r deM A Toed,.RM. vcr Q �, Wsteeens�n pent., ti e°nn+w P••]• 219 N.E. First Avenue I.- •�..�Dg= Delray Beach, FL l`vrbeeb r le AA.•fr d,,.ol.da...PA Ids nd dmb w f.e1M 1. • i ••1•a\°° II r.ea kM pegoM pa,1r/w 1nh.er w�.M.o.de,. 10�20�99 lL ••1•� 00 1,,,„ .. I Al bm en le M.td.[ab/t mod w Fdat.d w TI.plentw/Menlo Z ".' ®. O ";;?Op `/ Id o«t'lent r�:et�•o!teetered I ...91'+..fetureis rr m]`p0.ele...eeeis r- r. O.O •O ?O pie. j1 ' f H-1 fetO]e per ante]� ikrewPll r.r d polo peke b plsM 1 11. 0'1? V7 QZO 'O�j00 1 w ded°e.■ .: v ri. '`7`I TA.uin AeI Md toy r oat a welren of ten del•f I eM anted TM I _ •P•1 �_ ' li t a a M TM Ii.M/.eW.�A MReHe^�%ad U Ue Mialb�cl en e1 Vw oml.been plalPp TM f1TD.M \ Al 0+enler.en the plan erertsd.d se•prld.end d be rP.e by the lab.ele.it. c^p^!' dart td.-oft SOW.,try dlse.p.,d.. .f•.+ ore,y b'd.ewe.1']alnooT IR t.1•reef.d is d..lfk.Ib+peke to a ® P'I.RIsrT N s pii 04ry dart a b• to d Ad A.p,iedAre MF1. O.eb+'.M .1 M. bonier le to.pwowd by In Londe., ere edl. x ® e ® o tar.aro a0 end vibe,b.*AM.ne., n-admen M PAIMs lewr.a to M orb.*AM eervte ner-manedl.vnM.1 Nat dui Ind.b height. TA.egerod WI.of 1M RQt ad)�vrt tote Ib•end le 1M • ft ® ® MI.el feed.of.fret A.lardseWM]1t.ee aM NI Mlmirceo 4 pp M A. gar e n ofSO d le edd..r*FF. + 1.....r. eL PLANT LIST .dt dt E KEY ffanTTC lure Weld.bums N111Ox xAIC Drr iT Y IIOIAACSMeek omk1/8•= 1'09/8/99 r n Or.°t s tr Y II ewe . Landscape flY U.non.Voloyent OT CP.. CArroo _1..._ 1 CI Men rt..a Cooed.er... n+,.e lir k sr ii• x n.o.n. �R.s.�pd�M.e�. Mo Plan n OR w. YMixP Dwarf .� +r kr M�°0 w° x.r"�•e.d.e+. atom.r,.. A ' a• I.P..br r.., Pd Pwb Moon. I.rb 1• lY e• D..esn g 1. Mo.�.• CoonP°".dd n2 loom Dom+.r.... r r °m.M°'}"aa v. nut Ter.t r.�.Y.r.Af lane. ]. ier• ir• P.O. ..c.° ,m .ate 1 L-1 of 1 • • International . 190-1/211,ILL n M. . DIM I••�n.no I.r!w•nrt10••1.s Y.I. I1t.I71.7I I 7•.1 141.171.1111 ji .. 111.21.1:4"." "1" i I I I 219 1 -- — OSOUTH ELEVATION OFFICE 1 — -- „- $ DELRAY BEACH,FL 1/4.-1,-0' O NORTH ELEVATION =6,—,..)=, _,iii=sg: .........7= , --,..,__.7=pa_ . OEAST ELEVATION 1KITCHEN M BEDROO 1/4'.p.0' _p Q Xl- ini 1 lk REVISIONS: r • Title:EXISTING PLANS& ____ BEDROOM BEDROOM I ELEVATIONS a 1-c — _)________,___Scr....__ __ 1 -- Dwg.no.: A-3 O WEST ELEVATION O PLAN ]/4' 1' 0' 1/4• 1' ()• Date: NOV.1,1999 • 1• :nernea A7d11tesN 11MeEPU..EEI�WFVLr t nZ Intfrn•tlon•I (CHARCOAL) GAFF / �( few l•,ne r.•A.a Nq Medl,nwMa 6••J11�•ner14.1..a1 T.I.1 111.171.7111 \ .. ' ►aal 141.171•elrr � _ El '�i _ nusEmlNE ASPHALT �caaR76sat1ott)— �` _ . _,. ,L'��.-;ate SHINGLES BY GAF ,:.5�.,�.. �rlrlf' • s 4 yp �- C�OooS oI * "NDCA t t•tINGs M tco�ft�s ► — = 1 wX _ _ 1 ®SOUTH ELEVATION 219 i/4'= 1' -o' OFFICE s DELRAY BEACH,FL• 5ONORTH ELE,VA 11046 �.+ +, TM11�eN17rt >r 1 t/4'= r -o' -It TT I1 7T }} CANVAS -� cli ---- -t7 1B ) 11MBERUNE ASPHALT12 yy I I r'� �� Q5 SHINGLES cAF 5 r i 7wr�-{nw i st•1•M�� NDCA MNINGS / � k - - ita 1 7r�_ ay _=■■ --SAINON) —Y r 1P �_■�_aa� 1DIO J� A �_�� I 9 PANTRY �- 1S , . _._. , ______., ��•i ++.�. t LIBRARY 111 h. I _ � ...... _ _ rt SW � 4 EAST ELEVATION rr, ' y Tfiil:11-tr: — - _, � }ypri le I r-r �f-r VC 1/4'= I' - 0' i _ T. },. IAA / t1000 FASCIA — (COLOR-wlmq — 7v w ,ram - ! e / i M r-s� OFFlCE �� 12 —t TILIBERUNESHINGLES ASPHALT —F ds CONFERENCE R • f --.A R w " i = = i nee: PROPOSED ( � 1) _ _ A kv .1 = = ���_ —r-r- -, PLANSdo _ - _ _ _ ■� * svl,I■% II-N sw1 II ELEVATIONS try E_ A • j 1 r e L[ ..,.s wen- I -•AROUND ALL OPE}ANGS b'00 elit TTERs r� �k r•I w Irk yr rr 7�Y �I 7r�Vr Dwg.no.: A-2 l'11'N1IE1 •ft J DM OWEST ELEVATION O PLAN 1/4'= 1' - 0' 1/4'= 1' - 0' Date: NOV.1,1999 HISTORIC" PRESERV:AT`IE BOtARDK STAFF REPORT t r: f Project Name: COA-111-Continuation, Michael Weiner Law Office • Project Location: 102 N. Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. 1T;EM BEFORE THEa .BOARD The action requested of the Board is that of approval for the renovation and enclosure of an existing front porch, pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1. BACKGROUND fZ r The property contains a contributing vernacular structure. Converted from a single family residence to a law office in 1990, the building was enlarged to the north at the time of conversion. The original front porch was renovated during the conversion, however, the porch foundation is now sagging and the porch posts and siding are rotting. In addition to rebuilding the porch, the applicant proposes to enclose it to create 194 s.f. of additional air-conditioned office space. The increase of usable space does not require an additional parking space, as it was included in the total floor area calculation with the site plan approval of 1990. DESCRIPTION ! ANALYSIS The proposal is to rebuild the porch on the same footprint, with the exception of the roof, which was installed in 1990 and will remain. The existing porch posts (roof supports) are currently placed at the 4 corners and 4 across the front. The proposal includes the addition of 4 new porch posts; 1 in the center of the north and south elevations and 2 added to the front (east) elevation. The wood enclosed lower portion of the porch will be rebuilt to the same height. The upper portion will be enclosed with single fixed hurricane rated glass panes installed between the porch posts. The glass will have screen panels installed on the outside to give the appearance of a screened porch. The. screen panels will be removable so that both the screens and the glass can be cleaned. The Secretary of the Interior's Illustrated Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings recommends designing enclosures for historic porches when required by a new use in a manner that preserves the historic character of the building. This can include using large sheets of glass and recessing the enclosure wall behind existing scrollwork, posts and balustrades. The Delray Beach Design Guidelines state that the above method of enclosure is appropriate. The use of screens in front of the panes will obscure the glass, lessen sun glare so that Meeting Date: November 17, 1999 Agenda Item: IV-B HPB Staff Report COA 111-Continuation- Page 2 tinting is not necessary, and should create the appearance of the original screen porch. While staff has never seen the screen panels in use, it is an innovative treatment, which should be given an opportunity to prove its aesthetic worth. A sample of the screening will be available at the meeting. ALTERNAT:I.VE ACTIONS 1. Continue with direction. 2. Deny with reasons stated. 3. Approve as presented. RECO=MMEND�ATION. Based on positive findings to Section 4.5.1(E), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Illustrated Guidelines, approve the porch rehabilitation and enclosure as presented. File/s/pz/hpb/coa-1 1 1-cont-weiner-sr . . . . • •2 111 ..- ...- • • • • - --_- ---- —•----_-_-.,_ ..- -----------------.- • .-_-_-_-_-----_-_-_. ....-... __----_--_-- - .... ----- .- ----- ...--____ ---_____............... .. .... ---z:z.:------------- -. ...... -............_._ --....- • -- I.. — ----------- . - ...-------. --.._ -_ -.----------- --- • -------- ._.---------_--- --- ---.- .-------. -- ._._-.-.-.-....--.... .....- .--....._-.- -.--------...- ... .---..........- ------.......... ............_ ...-- - - - -__--------- __ ._ ..—.------- ----------._-____ _-_-_---_.- • -' - — ----Efgkof" ra. ........". ____ ....... N Exist.trim I ...4. ..-- --. III ft4, -T- A I N aEI 11:,. scracning .g ... _ -=-: W• 1 1 I ITIcw siding tom; i 1 1 I match cxist. - N --- I— L I 1.___ i_ -_1 I _ _ 1 8 b Ill 'S-Exis rt -sl • MR A, . 11111 , ,e).. li>( YYY) K_ 1111, . , '1-r.-.*- --------- — ----r-- -----•• .:-:-7,7: FRoNT ELEvATIoN -• ,- . . . • ae .- _..- / —.,-.• — \ ::---.=-- . / • .....- /• • ----Existing roof ..._ , -=-.-_ ____•=----.._.. ------ •' -1--- - =• _—__—_----/ *-• /// _ ‘ ---.. I _ I I I (---r Existing trim ..._ I _ I — _... *''''...b...'%**,..%-c---' Existing roof -- • •- — .? _ _.• — . . .__ Existinq sidinq _ _.. - — ) i • '• i - 44* i . i•IV4*---FIF). screening I 1 . ----,-,, i • t . • _ , 10,01i4 I — 77 I I I ilet.v siding tom. ... ---- 1111 g skirt "— Existin 11 Exi ------- st. skirt - 1-- , . ___ .,__ __. .......______ ___....,_...,„_______ __ _ . ..31_ ., . , .,..... ,...._._• ,,,,,,....„..c...,_. ......._ ,.....,,„-- SIDE ELEVATION • • • • TRINITY 1 I I I I —1 L U T HERAN LAKE IDA ROAD ` N.E. 4 TH ST, POST o CASON OFFICE I METHODIST CHURCH iLti W W Li4 iii a w < a D _ I Z W III I • N.W. 3RD ST. ) N.E. 3RD . ST. al- Q 1 r ui �a I o �x 1.1111 CITY _ n I 'ATTORNEY . c I BUILDING 1 I- o _z M N 1111 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DRIVE N.E. 2ND ST. 0 co z -N O 1"- -Z W ?� Z CITY IN HALL !.! cn N.W. 1ST ST. N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST ST. • Z z 1 COMMUNITY I I: z CENTER ., I3 TENNIS OLD STADIUM SCHOOL SQUARE IIIL. I �; -4 z T ATLANTIC AVENUE POLICE . SOUTH < 4 1 >I < COMPLEX COUNTY o o W a _ COURT NI N N^— N , - HOUSE 1 '---, Li—w w Li N --immi' 102 N. SWINTON AVENUE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT I -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM289 H>ISTOR.IC PR%E Si*ERVAT,ION BOARD, STAFF REPORT s ' r e , Project Name: COA 400, McKeever residence • Project Location: 255 N. Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District I T'E MBEFORE THE ,,B The action requested of the Board is that of approval for the landscaping and paving associated with a contributing single-family residence. ' BACK GROU'ND On October 7, 1998 the HPB approved the site plan to relocate the house from its original site, 116 S. Swinton Avenue, to its present location, with the condition that the owners would return for review of a landscape plan and any proposed exterior changes. DES-Ct,RIPTIO>:N ! ANA:LYSIS . , , Staff has reviewed the landscaping and irrigation plan for compliance. The paving plan provides space for two cars parked tandem in the driveway, outside of the required 25' front setback requirement. The paved area within the setback is to allow a vehicle to turn around to avoid backing out onto Swinton Avenue. The plan will be modified to eliminate the rear yard turning area. A 6'high wood fence, to be painted white, will be installed in the year yard. ''RECOMMENDA:TII:ON . � a, Based on positive findings to Section 4.5.1(E), approve the landscaping and paving plans associated with COA-400. File/s/pz/hpb/coa-400-McKeever-sr Meeting Date: November 17, 1999 Agenda Item: IV-C il • f t•11- 1.1v Lug �rly17=, tic.,it, IIEmt V. IW II li itt -----N7-.// LI,t ., .1: • �1•.e• • 1t(# 1((• I, 1r > .le.n' , Y 1.. 1 4".ii: . I ,• ,1St Il) ri • •f - 1: , 1 �('�' ; :F:•• iI1 • . tT jp. 3-.-k7.:i. 1 :. __I,A;/ ' .�, tIpm.. z,..4.1.11. ...vt.:r. • :A _,,.1. --..ice.. _ r 'l. ). •t �.%. - log.D. (((`(( S: :3 3, 1•r3i/-?�``..)tjrr)j� j2)}jii.\ - ) 1}.±�(r)1�7� \ • (('[' i .,I -.�• y 7 .'' i.'l i .'::; .. S ' ; _L.21. • :1.- /J .i• a •. I• r-'_'- !7'jltttlt_au-LINJ_e1._ialiK _:E1-3_I__ ��r'\ r, // .r — - I fir,...- _ IL _aP.._� - - Y ` • 1 �� i//. I i=11+�lTr�:s#11�'' �.,�_l�tla'11_'=_;e=`_ate—_�3:�= \fir`. • f; i/j k i i t1•.�F 1 1`r%arFiiiii7 iii ilfiri i I (r; h ' • �1 trur:,u I11 Ail �,t � •kE ti.I. l�• y • r- % 1 • r►J'11I 1i11011111 •I,:1 I I 'l C1ll �lr _ Ath ::e.. ".�Jrculi J L,1\ f • III1II 11111111 II I III' '7-' —1O'=°—I J nn � ';-"_. I'1 1 11t 11(11I • C/ l.enc`rll! y _1_ e:a:(1 5x ,• 1 I ,„ — 111II'I II :I / 1 •• rcticPtlff r.11lo li �, —_:t_q':e_ . -.1I::n' a'•n — Q rz 4. I -0 \� / ll�ll;l It j I111 I'tt• �E _-1, ( F� I I � Irr J1� i, m°0e�0Thnlllrn tOORI: I1 Il ---______-• rmn �ertiy /� II I I, 1- �+I• el.ev.. Il,.r'n•17 4\ Toro too 61 I; Q�+nFI 1111!l C II 11 I CLLv.. 7lon'118L I O tl ,. , I Q I (c IPL I ? Ili_ it( =9_-1 I !1_' -_ '.. ` 117 ��� JI' Iltl - 1l 1 d�rC , 1 - I e . a, r ( , C �•�vt n nt a< 1 ��� Ilt ,�> ��!_� �i'jij1.Ll l! ilLlt:s �' f j rte 4u.el.:•,----���It� o I �Y� If) tfi�. ,M�aly,r�-till a=u•pt ,==! (� �/ !-I• 'AIS' �I:ciPAnl:l IC': t i•1'n r Ilri�����G1fJ' IIV ;I1.4 j YIl1�i'Pll �h j 1i1 t�3 1:1 %Is;=ill j� �ti 1r_: (Il 1j.r _ ee 1e'l 1Pn \. / / l.-=,,z:t laLirz(1�`;1ll�2-1: 1!=_I_! ..u�llli ,I_:,ll_sirl <_ 1 k II ligl • N_ j�y f,i7 EC rC.tGKo I II 1\ji\ 1' f HUH 'Alr pw' tdkl r nr �i ' ;a __ CLI'r :1tG�Ol7 1; � If lIConlrollor&(iDill sensor _. I nr t Cr 1, A. Tot.I lot ,r,t �(�>: I4,►t. 1'1�r ut.a,f: it .1i'ZL g I. Structure. p,r4ing, vtl Lv,r,, J,Ivn, ,rc. 1 Tc. • r • _`.!.tl> . . - C. Ta„1 pt rtleor lot ,ru IC •A- I) _k,73Z II lc. D. Aroo of tot,, ,hrue, I ground nv,t Icgl1101D re, - 0 • OM -r22o IIiin,. Irditn.tifis.Q _..TRINI T Y L U THERAN 1 1_1 I i LAKE IDA ROAD N.E. . 4TH ST. POST POST — CASON OFFICE METHODIST —CHURCH —. —W•- - a- > W Ui aZ W — N.W. 3RD ST. >.:::::::N.E. 3RD ST. w Q r> ,,i .-. — a 1111111 > — NMI ott Mk. CITY �' .— ATTORNEY E - o BUILDING K o —z — I .- NZ M MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DRIVE N.E. 2ND ST. o In Z • z O N i_ J-1I//Z . _ Z z CITY HALL (i) N.W. 1ST ST. N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST ST. J 3 w ui z z L I i <r COMMUNITY Z CENTER is •111, TENNIS OLD STADIUM SCHOOL Li -c SQUARE I 1 I Z ` T ATLANTIC AVENUE IA POLICE SOUTH a a a a 1[1ICOMPLEX COUNTY z ; ;--zx COURT N N .rHOUSE 3 3 ui LLi w O 1, N -'mmr" McKEEVER PROPERTY CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FL PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT J -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM289