Loading...
HPB-01-21-1998 V DELRAY BEACH All-America City 1993 AGENDA • HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: January 21, 1998 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286.0105. I. CALL TO ORDER (Roll Call) II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • January 7, 1998 III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. COA-333-Continuation, The Presidential Building, I Love Dazzle, 710 E. Atlantic Avenue, Contributing Commercial Building, Marina Historic District. Terrence Ryan, Owner of Business and Authorized Agent. Approval for Renovation to the East Portion of the Front and Rear Facades. B. COA-327-Continuation, The Rectory, 14 South Swinton Avenue, Contributing Building, Old School Square Historic District. John Szerdi, Architect and Authorized Agent. Approval for Exterior Paint Colors. ! •-.c HPB Meeting January 21, 1998 Page 2 IV. DISCUSSION AND ACTIONS ITEMS A. Request for a Waiver to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d) Which Requires a 5' Landscape Strip Between a Driveway and a Property Line. 24 Marine Way, Marina Historic District, Eugenia DePonte, Owner. Granting the Waiver Will Allow the Existing Nonconforming Cement Driveway to be Resurfaced with Old Chicago Brick. B. Recommendation to the Planning & Zoning Board regarding an Amendment to the LDRs to Allow Residential Inns as a Conditional Use in the Old School Square Historic Arts District (Section 4.4.24.D), Including Amendments to the Special Regulations Regarding Residence Inns (Section 4.3.2(X)). . V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Reports from Historic District Representatives B. Board Members C. Staff VI. ADJOURN Pat Cayce/ Historic Preservation Planner POSTED ON: January 15, 1998 file/u/www/hpb 1-21 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: JANUARY 21, 1998 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson at 6:00 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Turner, John Johnson, Susan Hurlburt, Vera Farrington, Betty Diggans, Tony Keller MEMBERS ABSENT: Anthony Damiano STAFF PRESENT: Pat Cayce, Jeff Costello, Diana Mund Mrs. Cayce asked the Board to amend the agenda to hear Item IV.A. first and to add the Ashby residence to the agenda as a directional item. The Board was of the consensus to amend the agenda as requested. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The Minutes for the Regular Meeting of January 7, 1998 were before the Board for consideration. Mr. Keller moved to approve the Minutes as presented. The motion was seconded by Ms. Diggans and passed 6-0. IV. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS: B. Recommendation to the Planning & Zoning Board regarding an Amendment to the LDRs to Allow Residential Inns as a Conditional Use in the he Old School Square Historic Arts District [Section 4.4.24(D)], Including Amendments to the Special Regulations Regarding Residential Inns [Section 4.3.2(X)]. It was moved by Ms. Hurlburt, seconded by Ms. Farrington and passed 6-0 to recommend to the Planning & Zoning Board that LDR Section 4.4.24 "Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD)" be amended to include residential inns as a conditional use; Section 4.4.13 "Central Business District (CBD)", to allow residential inns as a permitted use; modify the related provisions to Section 4.3.3(X) "Special Requirements for Specific Uses - Residential Inns", and Appendix A "Definitions". III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: A. COA 333-Continuation: The Presidential Building, I Love Dazzle, 710 E. Atlantic Avenue, Contributing Commercial Building, Marina Historic District. Terrence Ryan, Business Owner/Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of approving a COA for the renovation of the eastern portion of the front and rear facades. It was moved by Mr. Keller, seconded by Ms. Hurlburt and passed 6-0 to approve COA 333-Continuation based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E) as follows: 1. East and west elevations as presented; 2. A single awning to match the awning over the west portion of the facade to be Sunbrela Terra-Cotta #8622. The same style and color awing will be installed over the rear door; and, 3. The building is to be repainted in a beige color similar to the existing paint color sample included in the project file. It was moved by Ms. Hurlburt, seconded by Mr. Johnson and passed 5-1 (Farrington dissenting) to table the light fixtures to allow the applicant to return with fixtures consistent with the Art Moderne style of the building. At this point on the agenda the Chair was turned over to Vice-Chairperson Johnson as Chairperson Turner left the meeting. B. COA 327-Continuation: The Rectory, 14 S. Swinton Avenue, Contributing Building, Old School Square Historic District. John Szerdi, Architect/Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of approving a COA for exterior paint colors. It was moved by Ms. Hurlburt, seconded by Ms. Diggans and passed 5-0 to approve COA 327-Continuation based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E) and the Design Guidelines for the color scheme as follows: All paints are Sherwin Williams 1. Accent (mullions & doors) - Island Cay/1747 2. Accent (gable trim) - Deco Coral/1810 3. Trim (eaves, shutters, railings & corner boards) - Star Sapphire/1617 4. Body -Acapulco Sun/1607 -2- 01/21/98 IV. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS: A. Request for a Waiver to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d) which Requires a 5' landscape Strip between a Driveway and a Property Line. 24 Marine Way, Marina Historic District. Eugenia DePonte, Owner; Tracey Ray, Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of approving a waiver to allow the existing non-conforming cement driveway to be resurfaced with Old Chicago Brick. It was moved by Ms. Hurlbut, seconded by Mr. Keller and passed 4-1 (Farrington dissenting) to grant the waiver request to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d) to allow an existing non-conforming concrete driveway to be resurfaced with Old Chicago Brick based upon positive findings with respect to Section 2.4.7(B)(5), with the following condition: • That only the existing concrete driveway area is to be resurfaced. The size of the existing driveway may not be increased in any manner. At this point on the agenda Chairperson Turner returned to the meeting. C. Ashby Residence: 327 S.E. 7th Avenue, Vacant Lot, New Construction of a single Family Residence, Marina Historic District. Corky Diamond, Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of direction on a new proposal for previously denied design elements for a new single family residence. After a brief discussion it was determined that the applicant would come back for pre-application at the Board's February 4, 1998 meeting. V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS: A. Reports from Historic District Representatives None B. Board Members Mr. Keller inquired if staff new the whereabouts of the Del-Ida Park sign, as it has been missing for quite some time. Ms. Mund stated that the Del-Ida Park Homeowners Association had requested that the City repair the sign sometime ago but could not remember the outcome and would look into it. -3- 01/21/98 Mr. Johnson stated that he read an article in the newspaper that said the City had hired a consultant to do a traffic study of the downtown that looked at converting the one-way pairs. The study included S.E. 1st Street and Swinton Avenue which is in the Old School Square Historic District, yet the Board was not privy to the Downtown Traffic Study and he felt that they should have been. He asked to see the study as he did not agree with the findings that the conversion of the one-way pairs was too costly. C. Staff Mrs. Cayce passed out the resolution for the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board's awards and asked the Board to review it so they could work on writing a resolution for Historic Preservation Board awards at a future meeting. Mrs. Cayce stated that Ms. Dominguez had sent another memo to Mr. Owens requesting a traffic study be done for Palm Square for a 24 hour period from Wednesday to Sunday, as soon as possible, but before March 15, 1998. Mrs. Cayce stated that the Check Cashing stores lights under the eyebrow of the building had not been approved by the Board but had been approved on the working drawings and she would discuss this with the Planning Director. Mrs. Cayce stated that there was no record of a permit to install exterior light fixtures for Old School Square but she was still looking into the matter. Mrs. Cayce stated that the Price house would be moved to its new location on Monday, January 26th at 9:00 a.m. The house would be before the Board at their February 4, 1998 meeting for listing on the Local Register of Historic Places. VI. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business before the Board, Ms. Farrington moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:50 P.M., seconded by Ms. Diggans and passed 6-0. The undersigned is the Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for January 21, 1998, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on February 4, 1998. Diana Mund If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. -4- 01/21/98 l ' ::::.PF ESER`1lATIO1 BO Project Name: COA-333-Continuation Project Location: 710 E. Atlantic Avenue E . .:::::..::::::::...... . ... ....................... The action requested of the Board is that of approval of COA 333-Continuation. This proposal came to the Board at its meeting of January 7, 1998. The Board continued the COA with the following direction: Atlantic Avenue facade (north elevation). That the existing center support post be left intact, and that the second (east) front entrance door opening be reconstructed in its original location, adjacent to the east of the support column; the fluted door frames and transoms should remain. As the lower several feet of the east door frame is missing, it will need to be restored or replicated to match what remains. The original doors are no longer in place, and as the Board did not specify what type of doors are to be used, staff recommended that several appropriate choices be submitted for consideration. That the show windows remain in their original location and size. The new hurricane shutters should be constructed so that the track is removable and only the bolt holes remain visible when the shutters are removed. Rear facade (south elevation). That the rear windows not be blocked up or removed. E. Atlantic Avenue facade. The center support post is to be left as existing. The east entrance door will be installed in its original location. The fluted door frame on the east will be Meeting Date: January 21, 1998 Agenda Item: Ill-A HPB Staff Report COA-333-Continuation Page 2 restored. The transoms will remain. The front doors will be constructed to match the balance of the original doors on the building. The exiting show windows will remain as is. The east window will be restored to its original size by the restoration of the original east door The existing awning over the west portion of the building will be extended to cover the entire facade, or a new awning will be installed to match the west awning. The applicant will provide pictures of the new light fixtures. Rear facade. A new door to match originals will be installed. All existing windows will remain. The double window to the east of the door will be repaired. A new canvas awning to match the front will be installed over the door. The hurricane shutters have not been addressed with this proposal. However, the shutters require a separate building permit and the owner of the building is aware of the Board's recommendation for hurricane protection for historic structures. The design of the shutters is not relevant to this COA. The applicant has followed the Board's direction in every respect. The proposal will restore the facade to its original condition which will enhance an important contributing commercial building and reinforce the historic character of the Marina District. 1. Approve as presented. 2. Deny, with reasons stated. 1. Based upon positive finding to Section 4.5.1(E) Development Standards and the Design Guidelines, approve COA-333 as presented. file/u/ww/coa333s2 EXISTING BUILDING r EXISTING FENESTRATIONS • • -- J / EXISTING BACLONY - - + I0'-2" AFF EXIST. CEILING + 9'-m" AFF NEW CEILING HT. EXTEND EXISTING AWING OR INSTALL NEW TO MATCH IN SIZE, SHAPE AND COLOR. NEW LIGHT FIXTURES REFER TO SAMPLE- + 62 PSF (TYPICAL) -66P5F EXISTING WINODW EXISTING WINODW TO REMAIN AS IS TO REMAIN AS IS EXIST. FIN. FL. L , RENOVATE OR REPLICATE 2 NEW WOOD AND GLASS FLUTED DOOR FRAME TO _ DOORS TO MATCH THE EXISTING MATCH ORIGINAL BLDG. FRAMES. DOORS OF REMAINING BAYS. PROPOSES NORTI-I 6L 6VATION SCALE: I/4' = 1'-0' EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING FENESTRATIONS EXISTING BACLONY + I0'-2" AFF EXIST. CEILING ` - NEW LIGHT FIXTURE + 9'-0' AFF REFER TO SAMPLE _ `r NEW CEILING HT. • NEW.CA AS AWNING _ _ EXISTING WINDOWS RENOVATE EXISTING m'-m" TO REMAIN AS IS. WINDOW EXIST. FIN. FL. - NEW DOOR TO MATCH EXISTING SOLID DOOR ORIGINAL BUILDING DOORS TO UPSTAIRS, NOT PART OF THIS TENANT SPACE. PIROPOS6 C) SUTI-I 6I_6VATI O N SCALE: I/4' I'-0. a •' � , � ' . , l / _ ` � \, J�Q•' �. 1' ' .� '•.: . , c _ . •_ . . ;� • G l .•• i _ t :. - .. I• � . . 7 � ` d _ ` _ — • 1. - _ s...... - ...... .:. r-- _ `�- , • • Yyf:+Y••.••L'r?i .naV- v�-•�3.*W.--•*-•-ate "._---: .• .� t. A-�^j - •.v rt��'�Y •A.•Y .jaw 41:`- y*•+--. �:.- !. - . _ _�- .. - _•. .... tr ♦yy.M-r _ _.4�; a ISO.r•. �•T",C ..�Yy•-' �'••-`- • _ - •+/G}}y11 ••c�^n- -v1',LCS iCto.. jy :•_ -y am:-e - ,5S,{Lr'%ac�z•C>'L . -� O-3 ''Ci: tt+ �(K.,a=kx .z ,....• i y y ._ : : , I!":'`•3 ' ' ,--___._:___--) —---, - BEA- ' . I , w I • • 1 —;--- . k 1 - 6 5 ) : • `f , L. ArialiMi14 C, _.. ,.. I -A ,•!Q -I (50-129) 7,, tr, „r7 r 1 D - „[4 ,,,. Y . - I — I Ci ''' ' , , .. 1,.... I -`• Ct-j le. '5 • 111 - ' •....-3, AVE • rr ir. " "4. - -I- I-1-11.--1 u..i.i....... 1-..it r-7---r—t t—i—i -1- 1 11 i 1 LI1 I. i . 1 2)7-/ I • 174 . / .-/-/51/ /frZ. U I ,___7_. ..,• • L • rf-ilA;i ...I-4c •,r I .4.. .1•I _ S 0• 7-g 7 /7e ,r'&71' ) - ,41 .. 7 - „....i -1, ...--...- . 1 OF t •--d• . 1 - - . . .—___ 1[.... ,..1.1.1.-4.-- : ::.,,J.,..- . • 1 . = , - 1 r ...... t • s„: I lir 1• •CL .•_;.‘14, ' -3...:- ) : 8 . 1 IS '1 ° t 8 3 di. -.I .% 7 1.---.•: • _ _...:- . . I --A -- ON DOil --ar- .... "-.. 117717:./ III 4-• ... .. f i I. 1 14 Zf V I-4 04 IT *2,-27121...-. '• —L—.—, 1st , ..1.4 •N 4 4 Ar 1 It•-, ' 1ma7. ' • 4• d.e.1 I.I -• Iti Iv 11 '4 1 ; 1 1, - . r . I --.e -x . w).. „ . • . • =z . 1._, 41 : [ ::. .41.11 I ..t- • 1 : 'T.-- -----: 1 J 8 ? sua 1 OF —___ . . (9 . , 126 : . , -. 0 • I . 4) : , .< < . -- _ i BLOOK1 126 _, _______ 1.. , . ar • --, _____ ' 1 -...) • : I : ' 1 . I :__ _ _ _ / . . : 1 I 14) : _, --: . . 1.___ _ ____' I- *- 1 ; - --1 -4 -• 20,,,.. -.1-,,,..40 20,,f.; ro . 14 k„,-11 IZ, • ..• 7\1'1- IA4 I r.II 0 IS r•I....1 II ..77.1.7...., znel..... 7, 1,..... ...•67•••••••••• ST ir t. I 1 de ! i 4 . i ; .'..I :1” .7. F.: "" 1 Z4 iz : ..4 .67E . I •.. .t 1 1 . OORING'S • - '1. 1:144 CI LI t : 1 ta 1 I : -t q/II •Yr3. •z, I k : .''. ' 1 S. i .., ,.,......•w,..* ry.:7 - I I I RESUa. "-.7 I I"-----r i = GRA EY- = :i• c • ' BLACK 103 = ' 5.,.0" .'-‘11=. • L BY 0 ....- .• -i 2 i .r_ D L -1 0 , I : dt_.) , I , I 1( ) 119 I = (20-2.7) • I, ,.. , . . 1 . .. , : . 1 : ( 2 4 19) - , • (.........‘ 46) . 1 , — , I . , I • - ) : 1 . TO = I -1. :1-„,. :,,00 -2 I -1.- --C I , tiO 52) ... 1 _14 ltl ill tt% • , - t.0 I L+ 1. 4 s I ,; „ xi c„ 1 R- 1 A A •,,•• - „.,•• C fa" le f f. 11"V. 11 .. ..:71: ••I ...2: noe IZ I;•fe.1i....d f . . 1 ,---•-,.........7..........ord.—• __ST-- " •I i 1 - • Il IP •G "1.14 j ( ". -t 77T ;I.". 'a 4: "';I Z4"4.:,i) i r •,...,"'. 1 1 • .1 i J. 4 • SLAN: NICHOLS SUB, • jj ... : K , I : 0 -C : •lib . . I : r e 11. SU 6 0 F , i : : L.,: , : i : „.pm 1 -EILOC 12_ ' I •s. 113 28) -:."1: L., •••• I) '1 eviii ,, , . 0, _ 4, tr.„, 4 )----:. 1 : V) II2 i ' '''. -----; I , M1._11 ,-,1 ' TOW - OF DL LR AY / I/ 2 ) e i :/-4E-14T-1s • I .. 1 0 . , , 1 .0 -1 !501 •- I 1 'I. I '( •: I . '-. I - I-3) • : - i - . - . • z4.,..- . k,,,./3 ...,; "• -,....a - .t. t.' -i . • ...1h.1.ST I-- ---i -- ___L__. ______ .."a r.....r_r---• — --- - IIIIIIMIIIW. # ISTORI+C PRESERVATION BOARD Project Name: COA-327-Continuation Project Location: 14 S. Swinton Avenue .............. .... ..................................... ITEM The action requested of the Board is that of approval of exterior paint and roof colors associated with COA-327. At the meeting of October 15, 1997 the Board approved the site plan modification and design elements associated with the renovation of the Rectory. However, the Board elected to defer approval of the exterior paint colors to a later date to allow the applicant to present a sample of the standing seam copper roof after it had been treated with an antique patina. Also, the Board requested that the applicant present elevations or renderings of the building which will be constructed just to the north of the Rectory. The applicant will present color boards and a sample of the roof finish for the Board's consideration. Additionally, the requested renderings and/or elevations for the new construction to the north will be available to assist the Board in determining the effect of the color scheme on the overall project. Successful color combinations unify a building and draw attention to important architectural details. Additionally, successful combinations often serve to unify a group of structures, for example the 5 color scheme used on the 3 buildings at Old School Square. Delray's early residential wooden structures were white or pale shades to reflect the heat and to create a play of shadows along the horizontal siding. However, more latitude was used in the color schemes of commercial buildings to both draw attention to the structure and to serve as business identification before the use of modern signage. Meeting Date: January 21, 1998 Agenda Item: III-B HPB Staff Report COA-327-continuation Page 2 Our Design Guidelines state that paint and paint colors should always be considered in relation to structural elements, adjoining buildings, and the entire Historic District. However, it would seem that the commercial neighborhoods of a district, could be considered as an area within a district, with respect to more exuberant, less traditional paint colors. The CRA reviewed, and recommended approval of the project at its meeting of October 9, 1997. At that time the CRA Board preferred color scheme "B" which was presented on the original color board. 1. Continue with direction. 2. Deny with reasons stated. 3. Approve with conditions. 4. Approve as presented. As there will be several color schemes presented, as well as the sample of the roof finish, staff recommends that the Board be guided by the commercial nature of the area; the affect of the color scheme on the building's structural elements; and the relationship of the Rectory to the new construction to the north. file/u/www/coa327s2 / ` , r • 1- i _ _fir __-r'`-� <'CC- S'ffCET 5rX} 6init6' /2 6 /2 PUBLIC :1^ /zs' L SCHOOL 40 , i 141 13 /4 /5 /6 i/3 /4 /5 /6 /6 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /B •Q I -.. 3 33 276' 47.7 - - - . 7- �/ .1 �. . TLANT/C • Y C n 33' u17JQo I So 13 463 , I .. 1l2345678I ')1 / 2 3 4 / 2 3 4 -Z�o/J . v.r' i, �r 71.e' ao.r• 09.e' 1 /1 f. J 4)/4 / D /I) �L Z4 ZLC4:'�'1 � : � W � 5 :' // � 2 ^ 5 32 _. �� , ib -' —� 5. r '' 52 = p " . 6.. /2 = Q : 6 /2 - - m /3 ~ 7�/ /3 /O laiM�� /5 •:fir: 9 7 , . n ==►i ,3c = `�',,,� - : // b 20 ' '`1 • ,o z B /4 8 /4 2 /9 .4z443 to = /0 /6 // EN DIM • ao 9 /5 3 // /7 - /4 /6 /7 /B =M 1111 - /O /6 R " /O /6 . � / c ../2 /8 aN- /3Q6- SO' ^ •/Je'6'. /3f.G' /3/.6' /3/6' / 8• _p0 T� 135' /35' �` 55 A TT �. CRAYMONOJ S. E. 1ST “..�• - y /.}►L' ar..6' y .O'6S�. • • • • •2S y /71.4' /J/.i' y 33 3 •• ' 46. •. in 1. ' / s SO a - n / - 9 . 12345 6789/ � / 9 22 23 . Z,s .6 / 3 86 2 10 - z� // a . 2 /0 _ "' 2 /o = 10 : ZS I� 4 /2 `' Q ---- , :, /a/s- 13/s . h :_—.- -=4 24 4 Co 1 ; , 3 // , u) / Q I 47 - 3 // 1 ` ^ 3 // ,••Z1Z� (�1,� / , _ $ 2 /2 O i6`. - 4 /2 _ 3 h ��+1 4 /2 12 _4 46 /2 : to /s,� /B 0 70 /3 7C� 3 �, 5 /3 Q 13 5 /3 ' 12 - p— = 6 /4 - — 6 .�/5 i = =(B7 !/ P6./51, 6 /4 = 7 S• /6 to, ' 6 /4 :' Li 1 8 7 /5 � 8 /6 y 7 /5 ; = 8 01— m Kr}: 7 CIS /5 2 f ; ----,;"--8- - /6 ^ g/7 /8 9 20I2/ ^ 8 /6 - ,o°7 �i 9 h 11 8 /614.1r K 45 so' ^ 60.o.SST .6'.5.57 6o.v Ld /34 6' /�/•6' /3/.S /3l. v1)rga'N 135' 135' 1 'T. /` (INGRAHAM) , e ►$ S. E.' ' '6 OND d.SlZ/S- / / /63 / 47b' „ •• . 476 /516 AC /3/.6' 33 33.• /'2' . 136. h40' rad .• SO' 61.2' 36 2 /8 0 14 � q I b 2/ 5 4 3 2 / 23 $ 2_IR l6 5 4 3 2 /' b o e b 2 o 1'+3' o 8 - G� /35' b 4 S0' - So sat' c r 3 I /9 j * 3 13 w ,3 I k o A' 9 Ui =. 2/ ; _ 4 - p 0 7�3. /6 h ` /8 m a / /4 8 . 7 ., 22 /2 = = 20 = • 5�'I m. 8 /7 - � 3 = /7 `a 2 '63 S 8 qo, 2/ ,. � N ' 4s' -. /9-.476c ' = 9 5/8 _: viz /6 6,5 3 = 6 I /5 _ 97920o I ^ _ /8 • • 7 _ /0 /9 _ _ /5 to 4 `°= ;° 7 //O h. = /o /9 . /7 _ 8 _ = // 20 ; ' /4 0 5 �'. 8 /7 • _ // a /8 /se• ^ _ /6 = ' 9 `_ _ 12 �` _2/ _ = /3 6 `_ /8 ` /2 m_ 17 k1 /�. *-./5�- -._.../0._.' e-!3 22_ _ /2 7 q /9 r 3 I +.. - / /6 (` 19 /4 h il /i ' /4 23 = _ // 8 = zo a �p-- --y -gy p /0 ,,Q7 ',n 10 a • M. /5 /7/. . /33/' `� 2' h 6' `O �' 44' h 4e'h /�66' /3¢' r /73• /4;. r /30' 30 ST. i6f (DEIL Y) • e ' S E.,, ., ,� 40 !' /44.6' me.6• <d . ,3, . ,,' 33 33 h /1• /7r/3 co. 4 �• I Q /3.. 5 5 - 71 20 / o Z n /4 N : :::: HIST€RIC P.I ESERV TI.ON BOA .. Project Name: Waiver for Driveway Resurfacing Project Location: 24 Marine Way ....................... .. The action requested of the Board is that of granting a waiver to LDR Section 6.4.16(H)(3)(d) which requires a 5' landscape strip between a driveway and a property line. . .................. ......................... . . The Board granted a variance to allow a swimming pool to encroach 5' into the rear setback of the subject property on November 5, 1997. At the variance review staff explained that the front walkway and the cement driveway were to be resurfaced with old Chicago brick. The existing concrete driveway is located to the south of the lot and is approximately 6" from the south property line, and is therefore nonconforming. When the project came to the Building Department for permitting it was determined that a waiver was required to allow the resurfacing The existing concrete driveway will be resurfaced with old Chicago brick. The driveway will not be enlarged. ... If the Board grants the waiver the driveway will be resurfaced. If he waiver is denied the cement driveway will remain as existing. In staffs opinion it would be desirable to have the driveway resurfaced. The Chicago brick will enhance the streetscape and will be more appropriate to the Marine Way than the existing concrete surface. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5). prior to granting a waiver, the Board shall make a finding that the granting of the waiver: Meeting Date: January 21, 19987 Agenda Item: IV-A HPB Staff Report Driveway 24 Marine Way Page 2 (a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; (b) Shall not significantly diminish the provisions of public facilities; (c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; or, (d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. ::::.::::::::<::::>::::>::::>::::................ ALT���lAT1YE.�►.C�Tf©NS ................................::::.:....::::::.. ..................> 1. Deny with reasons stated. 2. Approve the requested waiver as presented. C�MN[ N�1�Tl��i Based on making positive findings to Section 2.4.7 (B)(5) grant a waiver to Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d) to allow an existing nonconforming concrete driveway to be resurfaced with old Chicago brick. file/u/www/waiver24 • ---7':. CE6F,d0 ..g . . E 2 o ,P/6,f'f iFfl'9' . . . - - 'C4,V� cowc,Pe-re"• /-,?e•"1-- ,If' --•-,i/DA,44(ev"-- .-•• 4 V .1. V . ....• " ki't i II. ' k Ai: • i_._j ____ . . • F. i, y e .y., y ,°/, --.r \ . ‘, : i I `\ c,,e,VCre •/05. /7 . , \ ;�� I C 1 1 f eel/ r�/1I� I C ' v ,nr,i,.„ .;,. � u �\. • .� 1,;.. •1! •I - z .5t ' ; ;u�o � � � i "1`••' • 1� ! •. :1 `\ ` ,I, .r 1 ♦`I wow-xi,'„0/6- : I.IJ %;,‘ j k,,,,v.f,,,�,/L.. 'I^Q i 1. , �l 1 b • y t t 1 . �Y Ii • • ui ,f,„.„i „t z-.fi ;' 1 '1 S I I�� "w • //A//1 ro _ 1 • . HOC!✓J 1^!l' '� w � � \.�s�'1 , I• � ' • ,, :s/,r' •_ )f4.V—• • Q/�/CiC/A✓ 1N\C•t�(1 V•i I 1 I G : vr� ; i J " 4------)., iLi 1 1 ,. �� �� lnvTYti,✓Eir /v/A. V ` FoUVOvvr ✓o lvfP 1 C.ty/:l✓ lI 01' CaVeA'6fj 1/A/5 1 , /D.VU,GIe;vj 111tFnr ccllnrr u.l lb. •I.' .la..n,..r..em I. a uu. .All rar...nlatlan•t a .urv.r a1 lb. land, J..ar Dw►.r•.a n.1. la .aud r .wa.rlth t►..1a1..n 1.401..1 .a rar 1.1.ur..rinl • In Lb. I fl.rtda .. ..1 tart,.tmr .haply 7101.1 rl.t14t aJ.lnhtral lam a4e. tit , U/'/DA/0 / _C /-0 \ O ..lid rlu..rt an • ;.\ A E • .2 7) ` J Jodx Us suifrx • ,, 1� £ c(,P/v,'d ': as" fv,P,✓/i, ^l./E,dl� I na xa uu • ` 94'- ,Vi!cFr%f f�i c C ArGis 'll O 'dre ctiTJJ7 f� y ,K ,s•�'/-s/:/i/tor Dvr•.!/33 ONGI E��RS, SURVL ORS, lAUDIPLANNNRS 1 _r 2do1 norm' fEfEHAL IIIGHWAY, DELRAY BEAGII. A • y ter: I. .4jr$i e - 7 y an, �ro /t, lvy3 /. ' .. ._...------•- ----- _ a......v n.a w,/bdl1 S. E. 5 TH AVE. " I So.u�h bound °� ° co •• • to•• . ` Cv N \o Su0 (D Co NI ON -4 N \� ` (,3 NI?) ( \ 0 CO ` h M - . . .. .. , 6/.2 e/.2 rA n •A .. n vl 11 • S. E. 5 TH. (U•S. H Y. No.1) A VE. o n Northbound .. .. .. .. .. ice. 62 556. So' .. .. ,• .. ., so' oo• , ,� . � L O t. . M \ \ \ \ \ N IV ►v N tvL� \ \ \ \ osdN 1 lial • \Q C v o) 0) ++ C1k N 4' t 0, 1 Co to p \ N W A 4 N \ O V Q) b► WM //r.s 31. 40 . _` n n n /cs.a� 3�•N of t�rz �aJ� �I VI.w a� .w co o N N w W, ;`I 1N : o co o3 rn (), '4 cu b \ • 4 w N N o � v N � � °o i .. .. \ .. 6O' 62. So' �' �' .. ., .. .. .. .. rSo a6. 60. 60.4. .. .. .. , .. .. /..�`60.4 //2,8 .93t. i //.ea 6o.f - J . F. T / « » .. .. » .. .. 1� J. /9/.6/ p' 3 29.4.ig' • /d5' za. �. &. . 6/• 5p• .. ,. /\ 0 35'Sus 2S .. 2 � 46 45 50' : or ..,,t �- $� ,2) til o•ttvvNd(ocoV� iti>'IuN`()% 3 . az),. °paR o, N o o N N w law�T� N �. PALM 4 _. SUED. Of O4 o °°•,,. �n_' °j w `^ $ co ti,w w w w 4,wy1 •N-h �,t� 6 : o • fir.// 4 J ,V `'y ow)!w A N'y Oo 40 t. N w toil z ` J �a 2a.s!• ( �•�, A�35.?f25 .►»o !. « . . . . .y�75,4.8 De 1 a `� ro fl 4 01 A N p Co v (3,, $, PA L M pa• S T. �' BLOCK,a » .. .. • • ,.50' tot' In — •76.76 60• 60•25 ; •• a •• 1•' 4 7 �O ,•,,,. t... /asG: 6/' .so .. 1 . . R/KER `� 9 ��Oi$'�d�' ��' `3 ; 33 I 4 21,,, CYrY Pi w oa.f�, .a s . O ,\40 40 �~'— �/1 co c) 03 3. ! . j/: ,6i i 50edicaled for -- -__._ �SO 11/4 re, - ----_----4-__ UAR ,„,a'' r . • Af!5* ' Sidewalk Only, 1ST 4L — o h'Roo City __._ t —�_ i�8'�? i Park •; 7i *4 ` CI3 al* -------------. ts. ____-,___________. rn 39p./� BLOCK T a 375 • 4t ./l•VLOCw v.`qA^ CQ V. t • ry �c 4 =V • 'II t —_ c* • :»::>::::;..• :PL1NNIt�tC ANqii40N1N BC3RD MEMPRAhIDUIVI...<;::>::::::'<:.:> >:.:::::.::.: samosommisi MEETING DATE: JANUARY 26, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: V.E. - AMENDMENT TO LDR SECTION 4.4.24 TO ALLOW RESIDENTIAL INNS AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN THE OLD SCHOOL SQUARE HISTORIC ARTS DISTRICT (OSSHAD); LDR SECTION 4.4.13 TO ALLOW RESIDENTIAL INNS AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD); LDR SECTION 4.3.3(X) (SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIFIC USES - RESIDENTIAL INNS); AND APPENDIX A (DEFINITIONS). The item before the Board is that of making a recommendation to the City Commission regarding an LDR text amendment to 4.4.24, Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD), to allow residential inns as a conditional use; Section 4.4.13, Central Business District (CBD), to allow residential inns as a permitted use; related provisions of Section 4.3.3(X) • (Special Requirements for Specific Uses - Residential Inns); and Appendix A (Definitions). Pursuant to . Section 1.1.6, an amendment to the text of the Land Development Regulations may not be made until a recommendation is obtained from the Planning and Zoning Board. This amendment has been requested by Rodney Romano, representing a proposal to convert the Sundy Estates Apartments to a residential inn facility. Residential inns are currently allowed in the RT (Resort Tourism) zoning district as a permitted use and in the POC (Planned Office Center) zoning district as a conditional use. Currently, the OSSHAD district allows bed and breakfast facilities as a permitted use, however the special regulations regarding bed and breakfasts are very restrictive and are limited to very special circumstances. A request has been made to allow a type of use which combines hotel rooms and suites, associated with a restaurant. Within the CBD zoning district hotels, motels, and bed and breakfast inns are permitted. As these three uses are currently permitted, it is appropriate that residential inns also be permitted within the CBD. Planning and Zoning Board Memorandum Staff Report LDR Text Amendment-Adding Residential Inns to the OSSHAD and CBD zone districts Page 2 In conjunction with this text amendment, the special use requirements pertaining to residential inns are also being amended. The proposed changes will clarify and condense the code section. It is noted that staff has modified the applicant's proposed amendment in order to be more consistent with the existing LDR format, and to better tailor it to the City's needs. ,11111111111111111111110) The proposed use will cater primarily to tourists and seasonal residents in the downtown area. While bed and breakfast inns are a permitted use in the OSSHAD zoning district, the special regulations regarding bed and breakfasts are very restrictive and are limited to very special circumstances. Bed and breakfast inns are also geared toward tourism, however, they only allow non-permanent lodging for a maximum of 14 days. Since the inception of bed and breakfast inns in 1989, there has been only one request for a bed and breakfast inn within the OSSHAD. The request was approved in 1990, however the use was never established. Attempts have been made in the past to establish a bed and breakfast within existing apartment buildings in the OSSHAD however as the apartment buildings in the district are primarily not historic, and due to the interior design of the apartments (i.e. kitchens), they do not meet the criteria for a bed and breakfast. These criteria include: no cooking facilities, maximum stay (14 days), limitation on the number of employees, limitation of the use to historic structures or sites, and requirement for a common area dining facility. In order to encourage the adaptive reuse of these structures, adding the residential inns to the district as a conditional use is proposed. In addition to allowing the residential inns in the OSSHAD, there are also restrictions proposed in the OSSHAD to protect against potential incompatibility issues regarding building design, scale, orientation. Given the above, it is appropriate to allow a residential inn in the OSSHAD zone district as a conditional use only, as the use may not be appropriate under certain circumstances, or in order to mitigate incompatibilities, it may be appropriate to attach conditions to the approval. With regard to the CBD zone district, hotel, motels, and bed and breakfast inns are currently permitted. Thus, there is no clear reason to exclude residential inns from the CBD. Some limitations on residential inns are currently provided through provisions found in LDR Section 4.3.3(X) (Special Requirements for Specific Uses - Residential Inns). These restrictions were established in 1985, when suite type lodging was a relatively new concept. Modifications this code section are proposed which will eliminate or reduce some of those restrictions. Significant changes include those which would reduce the minimum floor area per suite from 500 sq.ft. to 450 sq.ft., and deletion of the requirements limiting the maximum number of units to 200 and the density to 20 units per acre. Planning and Zoning Board Memorandum Staff Report LDR Text Amendment-Adding Residential Inns to the OSSHAD and CBD zone districts Page 3 The maximum number of units and the density should be determined by the Land Development Regulations (i.e. setbacks, building height, parking requirements, landscape requirements, etc.), which is the case with hotels and motels. However, it may be appropriate to limit the density in the Old School Square Historic Arts District due to the residential character of the district. Municipalities that allow hotels and motels in multiple family residential zoning districts generally allow them as conditional uses. Most maintain density limits to ensure the intensity is in keeping with the adjacent residential area. The density limit is typically 1'/2 to 2 times the maximum density permitted. With regard to the minimum floor area per suite, there is no clear basis for the requirement. Typically, there are no minimum requirements for suites, however the City currently has a minimum size for a hotel or motel room, which is 325 sq.ft. While it may not be appropriate to eliminate the minimum floor area in its entirety, is seems appropriate to reduce it. The definition of residential inn is also being modified to allow for a combination of suites and hotel rooms. Historic Preservation Board At its meeting of January 21, 1998, the HPB reviewed and recommended approval of the text amendments. Downtown Development Authority At its meeting of January 21, 1998, the DDA reviewed and recommended approval of the text amendments. Community Redevelopment Agency The CRA will review the text amendment at its meeting of January 22, 1998. The CRA's recommendation will be provided at that Planning and Zoning Board meeting. Courtesy Notices: A courtesy notice has been sent to the Old School Square Homeowner's Association. Letters of objection or support, if any, will be presented at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting. By motion, recommend to the City Commission that LDR Section 4.4.24 Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD) be amended to include residentiaP't ns as a conditional use; Section 4.4.13 Central Business District (CBD), to allow residential VP:a-- inns as a permitted use; modify the related provisions to Section 4.3.3(X) (Special Requirements for Specific Uses - Residential Inns). and Appendix A (Definitions). Attachment: • Proposed Ordinance 3 Section 4.3.3(X) (X) Residential Inns: Residential all-suite-lodging-shall-be allowed only inns shall be subject to the following provisions, limitations, and restrictions: (1) The use must be located with frontage on, or access from, at least one arterial or collector street as delineated on the City's Transportation Element; (2) The use must be located in proximity to office, industrial, aad business or commercial uses; (3) The use shall be used as a transitional or buffer area between residential uses and office uses; (43 ) The minimum floor area per suite shall be 5Q9 450 square feet; (5) The maximum number of suites shall be 200 suites or units; (6) The maximum density per acre shall be 20 units per acre; (7) The use must be residential in design; {8) The use cannot contain a restaurant, cafe, bar, lounge or nightclub; (9) Recreational facilities may be allowed, such as swimming pool, whirlpool, jacuzzi, steam room, unlighted tennis courts; (10) There shall be a height limitation of two stories. (11) A meeting room with a maximum floor area of 2,000 square feet may be provided; (12) Meeting catering and complimentary room service may be provided. (5) Accessory uses may include: recreational facilities i.e. swimming pool, whirlpool, jacuzzi. steam room, tennis courts: meeting rooms: complimentary room service: and other nonresidential uses as permitted within the respective zoning district. (6) Parking shall be provided pursuant to Section 4.6.9(C)(7)(e). Proposed Ordinance - Residential Inns • Page 2 Section 4.4.24 Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD) (D) Conditional Uses and Structures Allowed: The following uses are allowed as conditional uses within the OSSHAD: (6) Residential Inns not to exceed more than 18 individually leased suites or rooms per acre. (G) Supplemental District Regulations: Supplemental district regulations as set forth in Article 4.6, except as modified herein, apply: (4) Parking Requirements: [Amd. Ord. 83-93 1/11/94] (a) All non-residential uses, with the exception of restaurants, shall provide one parking space per 300 sq.ft. of total new or existing floor area being converted to non-residential use. This requirement may be reduced to one parking space per 400 sq.ft. of total floor area, or by at least one space, where there is a mix of residential and non-residential use in the same structure. [Amd. Ord. 83-93 1/11/94] [Amd. Ord. 13-93 2/23/93] (b) Restaurants shall provide six spaces per one thousand square feet of total new or existing floor area being converted to restaurant use. [Amd. Ord. 83-93 1/11/94] (c) Residential inns shall provide one parking space per guest room/unit. Other accessory uses shall be calculated separately based upon square footage of the use area as provided for in subsections 4.4.24(G)(4)(a) and (b) above. (5) If it is impossible or inappropriate to provide required parking on- site or off-site, pursuant to Section 4.6.9(E)(4), the in-lieu fee option provided in Section 4.6.9(E)(3) may be collected. For the purpose of this provision, "inappropriateness" may be considered in relationship to the historic character of this zone district. [Amd. Ord. 13-93 2/23/93] (6) After January 1, 1994, when the parking requirements of Section 4.6.9(C) are applied to either new development or a change in use, said parking requirements shall be reduced by one parking space. This reduction may only occur once. [Amd. Ord. 66-93 11/23/93] • Proposed Ordinance - Residential Inns Page 3 (H) Special District Regulations: (1) Residential units within a structure containing permitted non- residential use(s) shall not use more than 50% of the gross floor area of the structure within which they are located. [Amd. Ord. 13-93 2/23/93] (2) Residential uses shall comprise no less than 10% of the uses in the OSSHAD District as expressed by the exclusive use of individual parcels, other than condominium ownerships. The existence of an occupational license, except for one issued for a home occupation, shall establish that such a parcel is non-residential. [Pond. Ord. 13-93 2/23/93] (3) Residential inns shall create a transitional or buffer area between residential uses and nonresidential uses (such as office, commercial. etc.) which are either on or near the subject property: (4) A residential inn shall be associated with an historic structure and must be residential in design. scale and character. Section 4.4.13 CBD (Central Business District): (B) Principal Uses and Structures Permitted: The following uses are allowed as conditional uses within the CBD District: (5) Hotels, Motels, a Bed and Breakfast Inns, and Residential Inns. Imo: sed Ordinance - Residential Inns 444 DEFINITIONS TERM PEFINITION PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM Any system for the provision to the public of piped water for human consumption if the system has at least 15 service connections or regularly serves at least 25 individuals daily at least 60 days out of the year. REAL ESTATE SIGN Any sign erected by an owner or his agent, advertising the real property upon which the sign is located as for rent or sale. REAL PROPERTY The portion of land or buildings contained in a legal description setting forth the boundaries of the property and legally acknowledged under the laws of the state and county. RECREATIONAL VEHICLE An automobile, bus, camp-car, pick-up camper, trailer, or other vehicle with or without motive power, designed and constructed to travel on public thoroughfares without special permit in accordance with the provisions of the Vehicle Code of the State of Florida. RENTAL UNIT A dwelling or dwelling unit occupied by a tenant. REPLAT A change in a map of an approved or recorded subdivision plat. RESIDENTIAL INN A type of hotel or a multiple family dwelling occupied exclusively by non-permanent residents. It may consist of one building which contains the principal and accessory uses, or groups of buildings. Suites may or may not include kitchens or kitchenettes. Accommodations may be comprised entirely of suites, or may include a combination of single rooms and suites. The facility may also contain accessory uses as otherwise permitted in the applicable zoning district. RESOLUTION NO. 120-92 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, INITIATING AN AWARDS RECOGNITION PROGRAM THROUGH THE SITE PLAN REVIEW AND APPEARANCE BOARD. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, desires to provide awards in the form of annual recognition to those property owners and/or developers who significantly contribute to the beauty of our City through design, architecture and landscaping; signs; redevelopment of existing properties; renovations to existing buildings; and/or new development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, shall conduct an annual awards program to be presented in October or November for projects which received a certificate of occupancy during the previous fiscal year. Section 2. That the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board is empowered to decide the award winners by a majority vote and, in the event it determines that no suitable recipient of an award is available, to withhold making an award for a given category. Section 3. That an appropriately inscribed and framed certificate be presented to the person(s) or company(ies) receiving the award(s), bearing the seal of the City, the year of the award(s) , the category and the person(s) or company(ies) to whom the award is given. Section 4. That recognition be afforded in the general categories including, but not limited to, architecture; landscaping; exterior renovation; redevelopment; CBD- development; best---overall des.-g-n-,- signs--and--master sign program; and new development. Section 5. That Resolution No. 22-86 is hereby superseded. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on this the 27th day of October, 1992 MAYOR ATTEST: City Clerk