HPB-02-03-1999 •
DELRAY BEACH
AII•ACity
111111
AGENDA
1993
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
Meeting Date: February 3, 1999
Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting
Location: COMMISSION CHAMBERS
Time: 6:00 P.M.
if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to
any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these
proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the
proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to
be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286.0105.
I. CALL TO ORDER (Roll Call)
II. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
A. Review the Vista Del Mar Historic District Designation Report and
Recommend to the City Commission that the District be
Established by Ordinance and be Listed in the Local Register of
Historic Places.
III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS
A. COA-366-Continuation, Contributing Single Family Residence, Old
School Square Historic District. Jerry Vanhille, Owner.
Approval for a Two Story Addition to the Rear of the Existing
Structure.
B. COA-9-373, 6 SE 1st Street, Contributing Single Family Residence,
Old School Square Historic District. John Szerdi or Rodney
Romano, Authorized Agents.
Approval for Demolition.
IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS
A. Reports from Historic District Representatives
r
HPB Meeting
February 3, 1999
Page 2
B. Board Members
C. Staff
V. ADJOURN
(;7.X
Pat Cayc
Historic Preservation Planner
POSTED ON: January 29, 1999
File/u/agenda/hpb-2-3-99
MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
PUBLIC HEARING
MEETING DATE: February 3, 1999
LOCATION: COMMISSION CHAMBERS
I. ROLL CALL:
The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson at 6:00 P.M. Upon
roll call it was determined that a quorum was present.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Turner, Susan Hurlburt, Betty
Diggans, John Johnson, Shane Ames. William
Giffin.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Tony Keller.
STAFF PRESENT: Pat Cayce, Brian Shutt, Assistant City
Attorney.
II. PUBLIC HEARING
The action requested of the Board was that of conducting a Public Hearing
to allow the public to comment on a proposal to have the Vista Del Mar
neighborhood designated as a local historic district. Based on an analysis
of the designation report and testimony presented at the meeting, the
Board considered a recommendation to the City Commission as to the
Vista Del Mar designation in the Local Register of Historic Places.
The chair opened the public hearing and asked staff for comments with
respect to the notification etc. Staff noted the mailing date of the certified
letters to affected property owners and the date of letters to property
owners within a 500' radius (both January 22, 1999). Staff also noted for
the record and placed in the project file, a petition signed by 36 property
owners opposed to the designation, representing 65% of all property
owners.
At that point Roger Saberson, Esq., representing Gordon Smith, 1007
Vista Del Mar Drive, stated that the published legal notice was defective,
as the map was not printed with the notice. Brian Shutt, Assistant City
Attorney concurred and explained that if the vote were positive the public
hearing would have to be repeated. Mr. Shutt also stated that the public
hearing was not quasi judicial.
- 1 - 2/3/99
The Chair called for comments from the public and 18 affected property
owners spoke in opposition. Three spoke in favor. As there were no
further comments from the public the Chairman closed the Public Hearing.
After discussion, it was moved by Mr. Johnson and seconded by Mrs.
Hurlburt, and passed 6-0 to deny the recommendation, with the following
direction to staff:
• To evaluate the results of the ongoing historic sites survey, as well as
property owner support, with respect to creating a larger historic district
in the surrounding neighborhoods.
Ill. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS:
A. COA-9-366-Continuation, Contributing single family residence, Old
School Square Historic District. Jerry Vanhille, Owner, Michael Corbett,
Architect.
Item before the Board: The action requested of the Board was that of
approval for a two-story addition on the rear of a contributing single family
residence.
After discussion, and after hearing the architect's presentation, the Board
felt that the addition was too massive, box-like and out of scale with the
existing residence. The Board continued to express concern that the hip
roof was incompatible with the gable roof of the historic house.
Mr. Johnson moved to deny the proposal, but the motion failed due to a
lack of second. It was then moved by Mrs. Hurlburt and seconded by Mr.
Ames and passed 6-0, to continue the item to allow the architect to digest
the Board's comments and discuss them with the owner, who was not
present at the meeting.
B. COA-9-373, 6 Se 1st Street, Contributing single family Residence, Old
School Square Historic district. John Szerdi or Rodney Romano,
Authorized Agents.
The Chairman stepped down due to a conflict of interest.
Item before the Board: The action requested of the Board was that of
approval for the demolition of a contributing single family residence.
The development proposal is to demolish the house and to construct a
parking lot in i`s place. The parking lot would be associated with a
structure adjacent to the east.
-2- 2/3/99
It was moved by Mr., Johnson and seconded by Mrs. Diggans and passed
5-0 to approve the demolition with the following condition:
That the demolition permit will not be issued until the site plan for
the parking lot has been approved by the Historic Preservation
Board.
IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS:
A. Reports from Historic District Representatives
None
B. Board Members -
Discussed the need for a workshop meeting, and set the date for
February 24, 1999.
C. Staff
None
V. ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business before the Board, Mrs. Hurlburt moved to
adjourn the meeting at. 9:00 p.m. seconded by Mrs. Diggans and passed
6-0.
The undersigned is the Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the •
information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for, which
were formally adopted and approved by the Board on 217.7, , 1999.
-
If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then
this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after
review and approval, which may involve some changes.
-3- 2/3/99
STAFF REPORT
H L S TeO R 1 C...,P..R E S N:..B OARD..._
Project Name: Proposed Vista Del Mar Historic District
Recommendation.
Project Location: Vista Del Mar Drive, comprised of the Vista Del Mar and
Delray Beach Esplanade Subdivisions.
� TEM_. BEF,ORE THE :B A BOARD .. ._.....
The action requested of the Board is that of conducting a Public Hearing to allow
the public to comment on a proposal to have the Vista Del Mar neighborhood
designated as a local historic district. Based on an analysis of the designation
report and testimony presented at the meeting, the Board will consider a
recommendation to the City Commission as to the Vista Del Mar designation in
the Local Register of Historic Places.
S TAF F._.,C O M M E N'T S.... .': ...
At the meeting of January 20, 1999 the Board reviewed the Vista Del Mar
designation report and determined that it contained all of the required information
pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(C ) (3)(a)(b) & (c). The Board then set the date
for the public hearing for February 3, 1999.
Pursuant to Section 4.5.1(C ) (6), the next step is as follows:
After conducting the public hearing, if the Board finds that the nomination
fulfills the proper designation criteria and all procedures have been
followed correctly, it shall vote on the designation. A majority of the entire
Board, present and voting, must act in the affirmation to transmit the
nomination and the Board's findings to the City Commission. The City
Commission shall consider the recommendation through its standard
ordinance adoption procedures, except that at least three affirmative votes
of the City Commission is necessary to make a designation. In the event
that a directly affected property owner objects to the historic designation,
the Commission approval shall require a super majority vote of four votes.
In staffs opinion the designation report fulfills the criteria required for
recommending the designation to the City Commission.
Staff has received a petition signed by 32 individual property owners,
representing 58% of the 55 properties in the proposed district, who are opposed
to the designation. In the past the City Commission has been reluctant to
designate when there is significant opposition from property owners.
Meeting Date: February 3, 1999
Agenda Item: II-A
HPB Staff Report
Vista Del Mar Historic District Designation-
Page 2
It has come to our attention that several affected property owners who are
opposed have concerns that the proposed historic district is too small to
effectively reflect the historic character of the beachside community north of East
Atlantic Avenue. Additionally, they feel that limiting design review for exterior
alterations and new construction only to Vista Del Mar Drive will not protect the
surrounding area from inappropriate development. A larger district has been
suggested.
The survey to identify and record the number of historic structures is currently
being done throughout the City, including the area surrounding the proposed
Vista Del Mar historic district. The survey will be completed in August of this
year. If a sufficient number of historically significant structures are found in the
surrounding neighborhood it is probable that, given the public support, the district
could be enlarged. A larger district, encompassing the surrounding area, would
certainly better protect the historic character of the unique beachside
neighborhood. The Board may want to wait until the results of the survey are in
before proceeding with a designation recommendation.
ALTElk_tst VE ,:ACT.iONS.,.
1. Based upon positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(B) (2) (d) and
4.5.1(B)(3)(a)(b)&(d), Criteria for Designation, recommend to the City
Commission that the Vista Del Mar Historic District be listed, by ordinance, in
the Local Register of Historic Places.
2. Deny the recommendation, based on the lack of property owner support.
3. Deny the recommendation, but direct staff to evaluate the results of the
historic sites survey, as well as property owner support, with respect to
creating a larger historic district in the surrounding neighborhoods.
R_ECOyMMENDATI,ON ..
Board's discretion.
File/u/vistasr2
. •
•
STAFF REPORT
HISTOJRIC.. PRESERVATION BOARD....
Project Name: COA-366-Continuation, Jerry Vanhille
Project Location: 123 N.E. 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District
IT;EM ..BEFORE THE. BOARD
The action requested of the Board is that of approval for a two-story addition on
the rear of a contributing single family residence.
BACKGROUND .=.
The house is a wood frame vernacular constructed in 1924. The original front
porch was enclosed in the 1950s. The applicant renovated the house in .1990
and the garage was constructed several years later.
The proposal to construct a 32' x 24' (1509 s.f.) two-story addition to the rear of
the single-family residence was reviewed by the Board on December 2, 1998. At
that meeting the Board continued the item with the following comments and
direction to the applicant:-
The addition's proposed hip roof is out of character with the existing gable
roof. As viewed from the front, the hip roof is inappropriate to the historic
structure and gives an unsympathetic appearance to the addition. The
Board felt that a gable roof, running north and south, to replicate the
existing as opposed to the hip roof, would be more appropriate.
Additionally, incorporating a front facing opposing gable to the new roof
would echo the existing porch gable and improve the massing of the
addition as viewed from the street. Also, the Board felt that the addition
could be further differentiated from the existing by moving the walls of the
addition a few inches in or out to establish a break in the wall plane.
The revised plans are presented for the Board's consideration.
: -AN.ALY.SIS OF THE . R.EV<ISED :.PLANS
The Design Guidelines state that new additions should be differentiated so that
the addition and the existing are clearly of two different times, yet complimentary.
Locating the addition at the rear or an inconspicuous side and limiting the size
and scale in relationship to the existing structure is essential. If new additions
such as balconies are being considered, they should be on a non-character
Date: February 3, 1999
Agenda Item: Ill-A
' � R
HPB Staff Report
COA-366-Continuation
Page 2
defining elevations. Additional levels should be set back from the existing
structure wall plane, and be placed as not to radically alter the historic
appearance of the building.
• To differentiate the original structure and the addition, the north and south
walls of the addition have been extended out approximately 6" from the
footprint of the existing east wall, as the Board recommended.
• Pursuant to the Design Guidelines, the addition is located at the rear and the.
balcony is also located to the rear, a non-character defining elevation.
• The second floor level of the addition is set back 58' from the front property
line and from the front wall plane of the house by the depth of the structure,
40'.
• However, while the Board felt a gable roof would be more appropriate, the hip
roof has remained. The architect states that due to the construction of the
foundation and rear wall of the house, the load bearing portions of the gable
roof could not be supported. The architect will be present at the meeting to
explain his technical comments.
• A gable louvered attic vent has been centered on the west elevation of the hip
roof to echo the gable of the enclosed porch roof.
• Exposed rafter tails will be used on all four sides of the addition's roof.
• Decorative brackets will be constructed at the four corners of the roof.
PROJECT -DESCRIPTION
The 32' x 24' (1509 s.f.) two-story addition will be connected to the existing
garage by a breezeway. A 7' x 26' balcony will be constructed on the rear of the
second floor addition, which will be accessed by French doors from the bedroom.
The addition's roof will covered in dimensional asphalt shingles. The walls will be
stucco to match the existing residence. Windows will be single hung sash factory
finished white with snap in mullions. French doors on the second floor rear will
also be factory finished white aluminum. The addition will be painted to match
the existing residence.
The proposed addition requires the demolition of an 11' x 13' room addition on
the southeast corner of the existing residence; and a 4' x 8' utility shed on the
northeast corner. Neither is original to the contributing structure.
Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4 the maximum lot coverage is 40% with a
minimum non-vehicular open space requirement of 25%, in the OSSHAD zoning
HPB Staff Report
COA-366-Continuation
Page 3
district. This proposal provides 34.8% of lot coverage with 26.3% of open space;
therefore it conforms to the requirements of Section 4.3.4.
.C.:OMME.N.TS
• The existing residence is 1155 s.f., which is modest by today's standards.
The addition will provide a family room and bath on the first floor and a master
bedroom and bath on the second floor. In order to encourage residential
uses in the OSSHAD zoning district, it is essential that structures be modified
or expanded to be compatible with modern living conditions. Additionally, the
OSSHAD regulations specify residential uses shall comprise no less that 10%
of the uses in the district. With the expanding conversion of residential
properties to commercial, it is necessary to continue to improve the existing
residential inventory.
• Assuming that the architect's comments with respect to the construction of a
gable roof as opposed to a hip roof are valid, the only alternative would be a
flat roof.
• In view of the Board's direction with respect to use of a gable roof, the
approval of the hip roof will depend on the Board's assessment of the
architect's evaluation of the construction problems and the resulting
soundness of the new construction. Therefore, recommended action will at
the Board's discretion.
' ... ....A L T E R N A T I;V Er A C T,1 O N S ... ...,
1. Continue with direction.
2. Deny with reasons stated.
3. Approve as presented.
O;';MM.EN.DAT,IO.N . .
Board's discretion.
File/u/ww/coa366ff
•
12
•
•
a menravyntrelrmul rtravninarnentaitingerszweitmutorumrsranar ra ixrxit.rrraT...T:anvs27r.ctL"f:.:T.arlramJL7[uroxrEttra:34Qrx a.n...nuv1 T.^..II
•
•
•
•
�--- 5X15TING N 0F'
•
•
El
•
1.
•
!
• .
110
I ORIGINAL PROPOSAL
1ST ELEVAT10vr,''
TRINITY I I Hil
LUTHERAN
LAKE IDA ROAD N.E. � 4TH ST.
POST a
CASON OFFICE — &
METHODIST
CHURCH cs
k
L.
t w •> ' > > ¢
W _
D
z II
N.W. 3RD ST. W N.E. 3RD
ST.
> >
w <
< a
OMIII
CITY "'
WIN
ATTORNEY
o BUILDING l=1,7,S o 111 -
_ MARTIN LUTHER cc z
KING JR_ DRIVE N.E. 2ND ST.
o
N z No mi
O ME ,- w
I— iim ...1 a
z
z CITY — all Mil
HALL - .
cn
- R I
N.W. 1ST ST. N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST ST.
J 3 w w
COMMUNITY
z CENTER IF I
TENNIS OLD IIII I
STADIUM SCHOOL L�
SQUARE I IHii 1 z
ATLANTIC AVENUE
POLICE SOUTH a 1 a > > 4 .
' >
COMPLEX COUNTY o ' -�o =
• COURT N `= c N
HOUSE 3 wWilioEup
I
1
N JEROME VANHILLE PROJECT
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FL 123 N.E. 1ST AVENUE PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
l
-- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM289
STAFF REPORT
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
Project Name: COA-9-373,
Project Location: 6 SE 1st Street, Lot 21, Block 70; the southeast corner of
S. Swinton Avenue and SE 1st Street. Old School Square
Historic District.
ITEM- BEFORE THE BOARD
The action requested of the Board is that of approval for demolition of a
contributing single family residence.
BACKGROUND
The property consists of Lots 20 and 21, Block 70, Town of Delray Subdivision.
The wood frame vernacular residence, constructed in 1912, is located on Lot 21.
Lot 20, to the west, (S. Swinton Avenue) is vacant; both lots are owned by the
applicant.
The structure stood vacant for several years in the early 90s after a long-time
owner died. During the years that it was vacant, the Chief Building Official had
concerns about it being an unsafe structure and recommended that it be
condemned and demolished. However, in 1995 the building was sold and the
new owner had plans to renovate and restore it. Unfortunately, the new owner
could not arrange the necessary funding for the renovation and the house
continued to deteriorate.
The property was purchased by the applicant in 1998. On October 7, 1998 pre-
application plans to remodel the building for use as a bookstore were submitted
and reviewed by the Board. The plans included additions which altered and
obscured the north elevation (front) of the building and left only a small portion of
the west elevation (Swinton Avenue) visible. The Board recommended that the
project be redesigned so that more of the original structure remained visible.
Subsequent to that meeting, the applicant purchased the contributing house to
the east and has revised the plans for the subject property.
The development proposal is to demolish the house on Lot 21 and to construct a
parking lot on Lots 20 and 21. The parking lot will be associated with the
contributing house to the east, 10 SE 1st Avenue, Lot 22. This house,
constructed in 1913, is in much better condition and retains most of its original
elements including a pyramid roof. It will be restored and used for a small retail
establishment and will be visible from S. Swinton Avenue. Additionally, the
Meeting Date: February 3, 1999
Agenda Item: Ill-B
HPB Staff Report
COA-9-373
Page 2
applicant owns all but one of the properties fronting on the south side of SE 1st
St. between S. Swinton Avenue and SE 1st Avenue and 4 contiguous contributing
properties on the east side of S. Swinton Avenue in Block 69. (See the attached
map for clarification). All of the properties present problems with required
parking when the structures are converted from residential to commercial. The
proposed parking lot will become a central parking area to accommodate these
properties, as they become commercial.
The parking lot will be set back 25' from the Swinton Avenue and SE 1st Avenue
property lines. The 25' setback along S. Swinton Avenue will be heavily bermed
and landscaped and the Swinton Avenue curb cut will be eliminated. The
parking lot will be constructed several feet below grade to further screen the
parked cars from Swinton Avenue, while maintaining the historic structure's
visibility from the public right-of-way.
PROJECT :DESCRIPTION .
The applicant is seeking approval to demolish the house at 6 SE 1st Avenue,
located on Lot 21. If the demolition is approved, the permit will not be issued
until the site plan for the parking lot has been formally submitted to the Planning
Department.
STAFF COMMENTS
Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1), The HPB shall consider the following
guidelines in evaluating applications for a COA for demolition of historic
buildings:
(a) Whether the structure is of such interest or quality that it would
reasonably fulfill the criteria for designation for listing in the National
Register.
(b) Whether the structure is of such design, craftsmanship, or material
that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty or economically
nonviable expense.
(c) Whether the structure is one of the last remaining examples of its kind
in the designated historic district within the city.
(d) Whether retaining the structure would promote the general welfare of
the city by providing an opportunity to study local history, architecture, and
design, or by developing an understanding of the importance and value of
a particular culture and heritage.
HPB Staff Report
COA-9-373
Page 3
(e) Whether there are definite plans for immediate reuse of the property if
the proposed demolition is carried out, and what effect those plans will
have on the character of the surrounding area.
The building would not be eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic
Places. The building could be reproduced at a reasonable cost. There are other
vernacular structures of the same era within the Old School Square Historic
District. There are plans for a parking lot, which would accommodate parking for
5 or 6 nearby contributing structures when they are rehabilitated and converted
from residential to commercial.
REVIEW BY OTHERS
The CRA reviewed this proposal at its meeting of February 1, 1999. Their
comments will be available at the meeting.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
1. Continue with direction.
2. Deny, with reasons stated.
3. Approve.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on a failure to make positive findings to the evaluation guidelines in
Section 4.5.1(F)(1), approve the demolition associated with COA-9-373, with the
following condition:
• That the demolition permit will not be issued until the site plan for the
parking lot has been formally submitted to the Planning Department.
File.u/coa-9-373sr
Jan-27-99 O5: 35P SZERDI & ASSOC . 954 568-1118 P.O2
i) . N ! t ;J C I i. I N .:
.. I::
January 26, 1999
City of Delray Beach
Historic Preservation Board
Attn: Pat Cayce
•
Re: Property located on Lots 20, 2land 22, Block 70
Dear Pat:
The nature of this request is to demolish the existing one story frame structure located at
6 S.E. First Street. As the board is aware, the applicant had previously developed a
proposal to increase the size of the structure by additions on it's north and west sides with
parking off the alley. The additions were designed to shore up the marginal structure as it
existed, including a restructuring of the exterior walls and roof structure, while rebuilding
the floor structure and the southeast corner of the building. The building is unsafe in its
present state. This was an attempt to salvage the structure which your building dept. had
slated for condemnation and demolition. The Historic Preservation Board unfavorably
reviewed our proposal. Since this time the applicant requests demolishing of the
structure in order to incorporate it with the adjacent property located at 10 Southeast First
Street. This structure built in 1913 according to the City's 1987 survey is in fair
condition,but in a far better state of repair than the corner property structure.
It is the intention of the applicant to restore the structure at 10 southeast 1 st. for future
use as a small retail or use compatible with the patronage from the Sundy House. This
property is 46 1 feet wide and as it's position on the site would not lend itself to
acceptable off street parking arrangement adequate for future use. This property will be
unified with the corner property, where the parking area would be proposed. The existing
building at 10 S.E. 1 St. creates an unfeasible condition to comply with the intent of LDR
section 4.4.24(G)(3)because of it's location along the east property line. The only area
to accommodate our parking needs is in the west side yard.
The existing corner building would be demolished in order to create the side yard for the
structure at 10 S.E. First Street. The new site plan enclosed shows the parking area not
intruding into the front yard setback for the remaining structure located on the site. In
addition, a significant setback of 26 ' feet accommodating a bermed landscape area will
separate the parking area from south Swinton Avenue. Additionally, the curb cut on
South Swinton will be abandoned and access will be from Southeast First Street and the
alley to the south,greatly improving curb appeal on Swinton.
2 ON rrneRAL HwY u3Lr•!C)RT IA(;Dr it 4jE. FL iiiQL,•f'!iC)Nr 954—Se).9 08If3•fAN A `( I I IB••;7r'rt•Ii(R'uru';:;n'it]c0.71
4.
Jan-27-99 05: 35P SZERDI S. ASSOC . 954 568-1118 P. 03
/.
, N , ! C .
Page 2
In order to retain it's original residential character,the applicant will not park vehicles on
the north/front yard, but will create a brick walkway from the parking area to the
structure, as well as, a brick sidewalk where none exists at all on Southeast First Street to
the sidewalk at the corner. The curb cut driveway entrance off of southeast First Street
will also be brick pavers leading to a slightly lowered parking area. The relationship
between the parking area and the sidewalk on Swinton, plus the bermed landscape, would
create a visual barrier eliminating the viewing of the vehicles from Swinton in such a way
to create a beautiful landscape foreground in front of the renovated structure. Please see
the schematic section enclosed.
In essence the applicant is proposing to remove an unsafe structure from the city's
inventory,and salvage a contributing structure built in 1913 to a usable standard and
create much needed parking in the area that will not detract, but add more landscaping to
the character of south Swinton Avenue.
The applicant does own additional parcels close by to this site on S.E. I St. and north on
Swinton Avenue. Their lot sizes also create similar parking problems. This parking area
will accommodate additional space for those as they become improved to safe and
aesthetically appropriate standards. We feel we can conceal and consolidate a
strategically located parking area that results in a greater overall retention of the
neighborhood's character. Please note that the approved temporary parking area south of
the Sundy House will not be applied for. This area will be phased into the residential inn
master plan in the near future, making the parking unfeasible and quickly obsolete.
In closing, the applicant will be unifying the lots 20, 21, and 22 for the purposes of this
submission as one site. We respectfully request your endorsement of this proposal.
Sincerely,
JOHN W. SZERDI AND ASSOCIATES
. S7L,
John W. Szerdi, A.I.A.
Enclos.
/bk
2500 N. FF DE' FiV? 11 ill I•row: !AI JT
^.LE, t I ( •I'SII:NI 9' 955 Lo!4;-III'
•
. S.E. 1• 1 7, _2_ _ st STREET
1 _ _t
,...
,__,_
......
_., _
(--- _ _
..z.(..:.
).e.4'-.. I
I I V V I I
� c i
ROTTWEILE' H USE I
...[ (z/----
dr IJ� t di
-1.,. '5 t.4 ,-,-- i _......,
f
— i 1 r-'I
1LPI
r---� 1
. ii
w
Q L�j '
A 1 II)
I 0a 0
,--4I
11
0 1 h - I ,
E—
_Z I I LOT &21 I
r,
cn i ... block 70 1 1
I , , I /,, ; I
1 , II 1 1
1 IItII
I
1 . .
, 1 LOT 22
27,4
-#:.4A.*4.
;W 1
.1 r " - r " Q 1 ✓'V" r " 1
t726 -
60 —0 ( 6'-0" ,- 47 —2
/ / '�/ yrr.
t - c
...r I
). ''8' i's
� - ______I
��h
(—PROPOSED- I 'ARKTf�-CIIT ALLEY 16'-0"
SCALE ," - 2or-0"
JI JOHN W. SZERDI i+l}.DES";NSA_._�DETAILS•?X;_A« M _ EE
pTA CH AND N oai- J'F?;,ji?'.d' LWT};v. .'ECII:I pE"..6,.'.i-T. IrIIS IS ,liL FY.' G IY t-'._..-•`4:-
^"D ASSOCIATES SMROI A 3 �S:nCIA`E AND SHALL NOT Sr USED OR F R ii• IN '4CtE C EN P...HT:
V411-ICA.Ct THE :Tljd PETCESSIEN 6hi*4 A PE:N RRAL C. THE F1FM OR .TE LIR E FOR E
j ARCHITECT A. I.A. e.;u.EsT ;,a,P.T. THE 113ACTOR :s ,I CAE ALL RA��1, CS.S:T�xis ANO
1 DIW.IL6Xi=f AND T?_i1 T4iiS x:iik Or ANY CtSC A13CICS PfSCR TO TN>:E?ECli;1Cri Cr
2500 H.FEDERAL EDAn ` rrrEm THE lri3. cis DR N5%ON TA YE?IECEDE CE CWSF: Sr:A1E_6 3F%� 42-105'4'S,
FORT LAUDEFIDALF z sson+
•
T •
rL:'`7.L=. 1 ' s'7,? Zt
1.�,Syi-ems, ____ : ,
_.
r-„, -7',;( psi . 4, its t, _ _ _ _ _ _
` I/1 ;
-�z[r'�. h°°St.ejt rk.�'ia>Er,..--,,-
c I .i fi _ -^;Vt, '. i'I�.F r
c r '1 +
b17 •�
ri,/ ://..;:,;;;:m./4/,,
/ ... ....
/ / /1/ X7,//7/A///11,0Z///,',/, //// / /// / /%44////%,//://r; ,4/ ///// '''''''';'4/90 /
S. SWINTON AVE EXISTIN LANDSCAPE PARKING AREA LANDSCAPE EXISTING BLDG
66'—O" 4'-1: ° / 26'-6" / 60'—O" 17'-1" 24'-4'
/ •
•
EAST/WEST SECTION
SCALE: 1/18".• 1'-0"
• t
SHOWS RELATIONSHIP OF VEHICULAR VIEW OVER PARKING AREA TO SEE MAJORITY OF EXISTING BLDG 0 10 S.E 1st STREET
•
J O H N V V. S Z E R DI DATE: rLl.DESrttJS AM)OE:TAZLS INDICATED Oil REPRESENTED BY IRIS DR!;MNO ,'DL FOR THE U:�
41P, 27 JANUMY E999 ON AND IN CON- ,UNCTION Vdlll 111E SPECIFIED PROJECT. THIS IS THE PRCCERTY OF L IN
; AND ASSOCIATES PROJECT: SZERDI AND ASSOCIATES AND SMALL NOT DE USED OR REPRODUCED IN 'MIOtE M. IN PART
Yd T11UJT THE MITTEN PERMISSION FROM A.PRINCIPAL OF 1HE OBI! CO FIT LIABLE FOR THE
_ ,�,�— A C H I TE C T A. I. A. 10 S.E. 1stC STREET iUIEST LEGAL RECOURSE. THE COIIIRACTOIE SIIN.L VERIFY All EEI511ND CONDITIONS AND
2aoo N�1� F�EppERAI.HWY. SUITE s DELRAY BEACH, FL DIMI'JJS10N5 AND NO'ElI"i 1HIS orrice or ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIGf TO THF. E)Ei.U110N or
RTIoT Ut1DERDALE, It 333OS 4.1)eee-tlele THE Wl'>RIC WRITTEN DIMENSIONS.TAKE. PRECEI>EN(1[ OVER SCALED DIMEIJSIDNS.
* _ .. • _ . .. A.:`,1!",-, --7'- . ttigf.:' ? '"..--*-',....if; .: '-' .4-,P .'
;' r tr y � Ky,` 44 MQ ''_ '- .31 : 41:: ? r'1
..e . vit.. . ..,.%,--_-*I
} • 1 ,-
.£ �' - -- i'" y�`.
•
J � . + st r i=. : Tom. }
_ ,� a r* 111 t I I Ul . . t �c - t I, �`� �_�t.
••••••�„ - �!.-_•.� -•• �` (ram-M•1�-'�L% It
.�,. _- - - ,:-- 0. o.. yam,.yy.
•
REQUEST FOR DEMOLITION
6 SE 1ST AVENUE
COMMUNITY
Lei
CENTER Q > >
Q
TENNIS �' OLD } o
STADIUM § SCHOOL - N
z SQUARE Li Lii 1
z z 7 I I/
ATLANTIC AVENUE
•
-
I_ w 1-
0 0 W BLOCK Ld
U = Lii D 6_ > - > z C`J w
I_ , Q QQ >
O O LU LOT Q 1
(f) C> > LOT 13
■
Q LOT 14 �
1 LOT 15 ;
S.W. 1ST ST. S.E. 1ST ST.
z
I•'
N
2O�21�22 23 24 25I
Z .. I
''o CKZ 7 0 vi ,
POI
Ncn ''
I
S.W. 2ND ST. S.E. 2ND ST.
ri
11
U) Uj CA U)
I
1
N
111
-!
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FL
' - 6 S.E. 1ST ST. ri - 10 S.E. 1ST ST.
20. 21} (AREA OF MODIFICATION) 2 (HISTORIC STRUCTURE)
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
-- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM318