HPB-02-17-1999 DELRAY BEACH
bald
All-AmericaCity
AGENDA
1993
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
Meeting Date: February 17, 1999
Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting
Location: First Floor Conference Room
Time: - 6:00 P.M. -
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to
any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these
proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the
proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to
be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286.0105.
I. CALL TO ORDER (Roll Call)
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
January 6, 1999 and January 20, 1999
III. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Variance 57: 115 SW 1st Avenue, Lot 2 of the Sundy Estates, Old School
Square Historic District. Rodney Romano or John Szerdi, Authorized
Agents.
Consider granting a Variance from the Land Development Regulations;-
Section 4.3.4(K) Pertaining to Front Setback Requirements.
IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS
A. COA-356: 115 SW 1st Avenue, Lot 2 of the Sundy Estates, Old
School Square Historic District. Rodney Romano or John Szerdi,
Authorized Agents.
Consider Demolition of a Contributing 4-Unit Apartment Building;
and New Construction of a 6-Unit Hotel Building, Associated with
the Sundy Residential Inn Complex.
HPB Meeting
February 17, 1999
Page 2
B. COA-374: M & J Saveway Market, 139 NW 5th Avenue, West
Settlers Historic District. Max Nicolas, Business Owner.
Consider Wall Signs for the North and West Elevations of the
Building.
V. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS
Discussion Regarding the Agenda for the Historic Preservation Board
Workshop Scheduled for Wednesday, February 24, 1999.
VI REPORTS AND COMMENTS
A. Reports from Historic District Representatives
B. Board Members
C. Staff
VII ADJOURN
at Cayce
Historic Preservation Planner
POSTED ON: February 11, 1999
File/u/ww/agenda/hpb-2-17-99
MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
PUBLIC HEARING
MEETING DATE: February 17, 1999
LOCATION: First floor conference Room
I. ROLL CALL:
The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson at 6:03 P.M. Upon
roll call it was determined that a quorum was present.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Turner, Susan Hurlburt, John
Johnson, Shane Ames. William Giffin Tony
Keller.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Betty Diggans. •
STAFF PRESENT: Pat Cayce, Jay Jamback, Assistant City
Attorney, Loretta Heussi.
II. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
It was moved by Mrs. Hurlburt and seconded by Mr. Johnson and passed
6-0 to approve the minutes for January 6, 1999 and January 20, 1999.
I1. PUBLIC HEARING
Due to a conflict of interest, the chair stepped down.
Variance-57: 115 SW 1st Avenue, Lot 2 of the Sundy Estates, Old School
Square Historic District. Rodney Romano or John Szerdi, Authorized
Agent.
Those who were to give testimony with respect to the variance
request were sworn in by staff member, Loretta Heussi. The
Chairman opened the Public Hearing at 6:10 PM.
Item before the Board: The action requested of the Board was that of
granting a variance to LDR Section 4.3.4(K) pertaining to front setback
requirements.
The development proposal consisted of demolishing an existing 4-unit
contributing apartment structure and constructing a new 6-unit hotel
building on the footprint of the historic building. In order to construct the
new building on the footprint of the existing, a variance was required.
-1 - 2/17/99
It was moved by Mr. Ames and seconded by Mr. Griffin and passed 5-0 to
approve the variance to LDR Section 4.3.4(K) to reduce the front setback
from the required 25' to 6'2".
IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS:
A. COA-9-356, 115 SW 1st Avenue, Lot 2 of the Sundy Estates, Old School
Square Historic District. Rodney Romano or John Szerdi, Authorized
Agent.
Item before the Board: The action requested of the Board was that of
approval for a modification to the design elements of a previously
approved plan; and approval for the demolition of an existing contributing
structure.
It was moved by Mr. Ames and seconded by Mr. Griffin and passed 5-0 to
approve the modified design elements associated with COA-9-356.
It was moved by Mr. Ames and seconded by Mr. Griffin and passed 5-0 to
approve the demolition of the contribution structure located on the site.
B. COA-9-374; M&J Saveway Market, 139 NW 5th Avenue, West Settlers
Historic District. Max Nicolas, Business Owner.
Item before the Board: The action requested of the Board was that of
approval for 2 wall signs, one on the west elevation and one on the north
elevation. The signs are 10' x 6' for a total 60' s.f. each.
After discussion with respect to the unfinished landscape and paving plan
and the inappropriate security bars and gates, it was moved by Mrs.
Hurlburt and seconded by Mr. Johnson and passed 6-0 to deny the signs
as presented, with the following direction:
• The sign permit application must be drawn by a sign contractor; and
• The text of the sign should include only the name, address and phone
number of the market.
Mrs. Cayce announced that she had 3 requests for informal pre-application
comments after the agenda was posted. She asked if the Board wanted to
consider them.
Add-on Agenda Items:
C. New construction, two-story single family residence at the northwest corner of
N. Swinton and NW 3rd Street. Tony Keller, owner.
-2- 2/17/99
The Board encouraged Mr. Keller to formally submit his application as
presented.
D. 'The Steve Cohen property at the southeast corner of NW 1st Avenue and
NW1st Street. The proposal is to demolish an existing contributing Mission
Revival style single family residence and construct a 9,300 s.f. office building
with an associated parking lot. The parking lot cannot accommodate all of the
required spaces and the applicant will purchase 8 spaces from the CRA lot
adjacent to the south.
Staff presented technical comments from the Planning staff. After discussion
the Board felt that the building was too large for the lot. That the building was
too massive and that the size should be reduced and the design should
contain more residential characteristics. Additionally, the Board felt that the
longer side of the building should face 1st Avenue with the parking to the east
rather that to the south.
D. Renovation to the front façade of the building to the west of 32 East Atlantic
Avenue (the old Backroom Bar).
This is a revision to a pre-application review, which eliminates the stairway to
the roof garden restaurant. The Board liked the proposal but wants to
compare it with the plans they previously reviewed.
V._ DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEM
Discussion regarding the agenda for the Historic Preservation Board
Workshop scheduled for February 24, 1999.
After discussion each Board member listed five items by priority for
consideration on the workshop agenda.
VI. REPORTS AND COMMENTS:
A. Reports from Historic District Representatives
None
B. Board Members
None
C. Staff
None
-3- 2/17/99
VII. ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business before the Board, Mrs. Hurlburt moved to
adjourn the meeting at. 7:30 p.m. seconded by Mr. Ames and passed 6-0.
The undersigned is the Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the
information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting-of said body for, which
were formally adopted and approved by the Board on, =/7 , 1999.
,
If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then
this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after
review and approval, which may involve some changes.
•
-4- 2/17/99
STAFF REPORT •
HI •
STORIC PRESERVATION BOARD
Project Name: COA-356, new construction of a 6-unit hotel structure
associated with the Sundy Residential Inn.
Project Location: 115 S.W. 1st Avenue, Lot 2, southwest corner of Sundy
Estates
ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD
The development proposal consists of demolishing an existing 4-unit contributing
apartment structure and constructing a new 6-unit hotel building on the footprint
of the historic building. In order to construct the new building on the footprint of
the existing, a variance is required.
The action requested of the Board is as follows:
• Granting a variance request to LDR Section 4.3.4(K) pertaining to front
setback requirements.
• Approval of COA-365 for modified design elements to previously approved
plans
• Approval for demolition of an existing structure.
BACKGROUND v., . . . ..__ .
Constructed as a stable by the Sundy family prior to 1922, the subject building
was converted to a 4-unit apartment building prior to 1926. It is a two-story
structure of wood frame construction clad in horizontal wood clapboard. A
portion of the clapboard on the 1st floor has been stuccoed. The building is set
on a concrete foundation, and has a hip roof, which is finished in asphalt
shingles.
On March 18, 1998 the Board approved the floor plans and elevations to convert
the structure from 4 apartment units to 6 hotel units associated with the Sundy
Inn. At the same meeting a variance was granted to allow the balcony on the
west facade (S.W. 1st Avenue) to be widened by 1.5', thus reducing the front
setback from 3' to 1.5' where 25' is required.
After further investigation of the building, the architect has determined that the
structure is too deteriorated to be rehabilitated. The applicant is proposing to
demolish the existing building and to reconstruct it from the foundation up, while
salvaging flooring, siding, etc. as much as is practical. With some modification,
Meeting Date: February 17, 1999
Agenda Item: II and III-A
HPB Staff Report
COA-356-Continution
Page 2
the design will replicate the renovation plans, which the Board approved at its
meeting of March 18, 1998.
The Board reviewed the demolition request on September 16, 1998, and voted to
continue the item to allow the applicant to prepare the following:
• Plans of what will be constructed on the site; and,
• An evaluation of the building's structural condition, prepared by a qualified
architect or engineer.
The applicant submitted the above information and the Board revisited the
demolition request at its meeting of January 20, 1999. After discussion,
especially with respect to granting the necessary variance, the Board voted to
approve the demolition after the variance is granted and the modified COA is
approved.
\/AER;l A Nn G E A'NTAVY41TFCT
Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), the minimum front setback requirement in the
Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD) is 25'. The existing building,
on whose footprint the applicant seeks to construct the new building, is set back
5'8" from the front property line (SW 1st Avenue). Thus, a variance to allow a 5'8"
setback is requested, where 25' is required.
Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(J) Historic Preservation Board to Act on Variance
Requests, the Board is guided by the following criteria.
(2) That a variance is necessary to accommodate an appropriate adaptive
reuse of a structure within an Historic District or upon an Historic Site
through demonstrating that:
(a) A variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or
welfare.
(b) The variance would not significantly diminish the historic character
of the Historic district or Site.
(c) The variance requested is the minimum necessary to effect the
adaptive reuse of an existing structure or site.
The variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare, as
the existing building, constructed prior to 1922, is set back the same distance as
the requested variance. Granting the variance will preserved the rhythm of
HPB Staff Report
COA-356-Continution
Page 3
streetscape, especially as it relates to the building to the north, which has a 10'
front setback. The variance is the minimum necessary to allow the building to be
reconstructed on its historic footprint
With respect to the balcony a variance is not necessary as one was previously
granted by the Board on 3/18/98.
„ ,, ... .. .,.. .._,.D E M OrL l T I O,N A N�A L YS 1S
Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1), the HPB shall consider the following
guidelines in evaluating applications for a COA for demolition of historic
buildings:
(a) Whether the structure is of such interest or quality that it would
reasonably fulfill the criteria for designation for listing in the National
Register.
(b) Whether the structure is of such design, craftsmanship, or material
that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty or economically
nonviable expense.
(c) Whether the structure is one of the last remaining examples of its kind
in the designated historic district within the city.
(d) Whether retaining the structure would promote the general welfare of
the city by providing an opportunity to study local history, architecture,
and design, or by developing an understanding of the importance and
value of a particular culture and heritage.
(e) Whether there are definite plans for immediate reuse of the property if
the proposed demolition is carried out, and what effect those plans will
have on the character of the surrounding area.
Staffs evaluation of the guidelines is as follows: •
The subject property would not qualify for individual listing in the National
Register, but could fulfill the criteria as part of a National Register district. The
building could be reproduced at a reasonable cost. The structure is one of the
last remaining examples of its kind in the Old School Square Historic District.
There are definite plans for what will replace the building. As the design of the
replacement building has been previously approved by the Board, its effect on
the character of the surrounding area has already been considered. '
HPB Staff Report
COA-356-Continution
,Page 4 - --
ANALYSIS OF THE MODIFIE- DES1G`N ELEMENTS
Modifications to the approved plans are as follows:
The building will be constructed 3' above street level. The 3 ground floor units
will have a small garden on the west elevation, with the main entrances located
to the east. The three second floor units will have individual balconies on the
east supported by wood columns, opposed to the originally approved continuous
balcony. The west elevation will retain the continuous balcony, but will be
cantilevered so that the columns may be removed. The direction and usage of
the stairs on the north and south will remain the same.
Each door on the west elevation will have one window to one side or the other,
and one smaller window centered in each bathroom area. The east elevation will
have a door with a bank of 3 windows to one side on the second floor, and a door
with a bank of windows on the first floor. The new windows will match the
existing windows. The doors will be French doors with full lites. The building will
retain horizontal wood siding and wood railings.
Elevations of the modifications will be presented at the meeting.
LTElRN„ATIVE ACTIONS
VARIANCE,
1. Approve.
2. Approve with conditions.
3. Deny
MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED DESIGN ELEMENTS
1. Continue with direction
2. Approve as presented
3. Deny, with reasons stated
DEMOLITION
1. Approve, with the condition that the variance is granted and the COA is
approved.
2. Deny
HPB Staff Report
COA-356-Continution
Page 5
R E-'C 4M M E>N�D A T I Q N• u; :
VARIANCE
Based upon positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(J)(2), approve the variance to
LDR Section 4.3.4(K) to reduce the front setback from 25' to 5'8".
MODIFICATION TO APPROVED DESIGN ELEMENTS
Based upon positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(E), Development Standards,
approve the modification associated with COA 356.
DEMOLITION
Based upon positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1), approve the demolition
associated with COA 356 with the following condition:
• That the variance is granted and that the modifications to the design elements
are approved.
File/u/ww/coa356sr2
File/u/ww/coa356sr2
i'Itynl
•
•
•
.C.I:. .
•
1 11
•
•
„u,allal�
'1 ,vrpin 17 ` ' '
Iflrtl llII
•
•
• • . • : i• Y If. it .
1 1, u _ _ L _ ___
UJ11I1L �� __ I]I[l1[i(ll1 iiiiliniiilliiiiiilii,,____________ _ ,. •
i1 ..... .• '1 _.__
I. ,
. �� 'e 'jl II I. 5 '
•
• 1 1
•
VV
I'THE STABLES" . s
•
,
•
• REMODELED EXISTING TWO STORY BUILDING scaLE: /s' li-oI
•
T,
ID
CT
0
W
j
L0
LU
0
W
W
N
In
N
m
X
ter-- -� - 0
1-4
/'
/ VI,-""".---'
I
1,1
ui
• r ir - I it,::, = , : Ii._ _._;_........_::::::._ ____. . i
I01 m1 ji I —_ I _ _
f ; i 1.. .._._' i 1
L`_
I I --,i
•
E.)0. -t-lits
WEST ELEVATION
2
. ,,!yl.,'.....• ,• •;.. • . . ,
„ . • ,. .
. .
. . • . , . .
. . . .
.. I
.. . .
'1 . ' • • ' . ' . . '
. .
I ' •I . . .
, i • • . . 0 :.- .• •. '. . . . ..
, .
. . . .
' I.
'
. ' • I.
, , • .
. • ., ,
. .
. ... : .
. .
. .
. . l
. .
. z
' .
. .
. • .
' •
. .
. .
. .
. . i AIIIMLN 1
. . .1 ' • • , ,,, ,, .
. i
. •
. . , .
. . , . .
, .
. . i
. ; • . ,
'---I ---------,-..,,...„.. • , .t •
, . . . . .•
. .
. , •. .
. . ! .
. .
. .. !
. . ,
. .
. .
'' "-----....:.. •
. .
. ,
„_ _,,___, __,..., _._.,.._...,•ff,--.V'......"7--...-.....,-M-_.._ „.......,....... C.,..—.M---'..--..... .....-, ...' ,..--,-...2:".
i i 'II. —— ••- 11 ,!. 4 = I. ' = ......
..
. .• • •
' % ,•.,
..
__ ....4'r_i)•"____ •1••*=aEf----r---.,=• 1'•-- 7
— _ • • . . - _•,•T
" . — = .- —
_ 1 — _ •.?',.,'.•.-._.•.::W_::1.:'-,.-1__1F=E1._.•..•,
7•r:.1
,........:f?;..f...A11.4•..:l..,i. gF=gF----''-"-'1-7...-.., I gNAAI1uR IMmMM •.-1--....-.:.-. =i'4==—H'-'
'.'...'_..- .1-4(,4i-.f+1".•.•.‘.-;'1'.r4;'j.'j
•
.,.• • _
,„ _. ,„ U ,. •I. IJ n • 11 11 U UI II 0 U / 11 11 11 U 111 U .0 6;
. ;. • ' ' ' ' ' J. . , , . , , •...., ,
. :',. ----:* i ':.,_.:—....• • •
. .
..7 .
. — 11 1011
. _ • Ili 01111 ii . • .
_
. . k Er IL NI .
, .
. ,,..
• ..
. • .
. .
. .
. . .
. . . .
, . . . ,
. , 1 •
'THE STABLES?! I
,
1
•
REMODELED EXISTING TWO STORY FRAME, BUILDING
. .
.. .
; : , • .
. :
. . t
, . . EAST OVERALL COURTYARD ELEVATION
. . .
. , . . .
. .
, • .. .
. .. .
•7" : • , . :if,: Al
.• ., ,.
. ' ''''' .,... ,s., '11,. '.!:i•l':' '.:i FIV!'. 10.
. i .
,
ilize ,g/10/98
. • . . ,
•
• .
. ,
I . . .
. ,, . • • .
., . .
. . . . . . . . . , , ... . , ... .. .
. . . .. . .
. . . .
11
iD•
cr
io
• Q
e --,L...___! ( ( r==, 1— i — • — w
•
I II i. N
t
II•
rTI
_1 --- I. -.- Li 1 .__I, o
M
t _ -ram `�� ��' I i '{ vi
. --.- 1I;11 1 _.._ .i
EAST ELEVATION
A
N
Ot
Co
N
. I-,
r
CO
V
r- \ 0
7
•_ �.. to
. ....-----w.._. ......._........ . Q'
0
W
w0
• lj-1 r I f1 VIi-I- - =
xi
I - ;' H
1 ` i i
- VI
I 0
NORTH ELEVATION .P
rn
03
I
r
.1-,
co
a '
UI
-^-•.�_�. .
•
at
DATE: 01.14.99 c3
w
w
w
v
SUNDY N
STABLES o
fri
e............."7"'•114.,fc ......4..,,,,,
i; :T -______, fDELRAY BEACH,FL
'I , i i i
•:•:•:•.•!•:•:•..:•:•: 1.,_ 4_4: 1 .
REVISIONS to
P.
CO
•
II _i1i
.
FA ISTI•. tf,
SOUTH ELEVATION
.1
i 0
A
i
3wrgii:
(4
(4
,_.
i (il
w
i N
0 rn
xi
1-1
•
CP Pa
___ -----
1 vi
NE 1 5 2,0 1 ' ficomfizm : t_i^4E, -6 Ou /"- vi
0_
----1- i___. ---:-----.
• ________--i._____!
) ----Thmim \------
---1 1 I eit'i_PIA*/ AFxaSe. \
:
,
1 - EXISTING STABLES
_ 41
AL I
al
CO
I
I-,
co
II
, . I
I. ‘•••41Jr .1" '‘;".1."'3'4.1 . ..1.46hc) :.1.- .S -
o ,
11 .1 I /.. —
\ I co
\
. .
E .1 IL. ; --_;1 _: I I I I I ILI .I I I �. .I I i—i>, o i,
II I ��---<1 <1 <I II 1 I 11 1.1 11 �I II 'P 1
`i_J I I I I I I 1I I I I I I i/F F'Y 1- i11 I f i�
l 1-I1 ( .2s7 --
I: / [—
�1 I ,-, ,, 1_� II II-1 1[ P1
i J17E
jI I �j � �::;;.;;,Ur,�;;Y I II i� I I I I 2 =
II — I II ----1F
11 y ► I 1I�J 11 Ir
►=1 1. rrT
,- 1I111< Ii I I -- _ ) II I �
SOLJA� 1/11/
A L .A 7 . HI
AV = NUE
I, . I! III poi ' 1 I I 11 HH 1 �I
' I I1
=_ I III 1 �,;
1 .I I I I —!I I W
•
`-1 1 1 I I I I_J 1 1`I I '
1 ' 1 <I ••
r-- : 1 ' ! I. I �J1 V 1 _iziI . I IT
II IIj l57J 1 1 11 1IIII� � ' � � 1 11
.>
1.. .�
•
I
I— FT i I I !p_ �; i_l . LH— N
1:---; 1--I I l l i 1 1 -i IL.=
ST. = � 2ND ST.LW
III 1 11 11111 I I
�I ;! llll l
I I 1 -: 1 1 I 1 I �'1-, 4 l
i f 1 II }1 I i I I 1 I wl
•
1 I I—11 !�'I- I I I I I t f
.,i U , I _ 5,1 !��,� I I NI I j
lai I 1 I , , I I _, 1 l I I I I 1
Eil- 1 1 I . I ! I
I I I vi
111 � I I I ,z;
111 i I 1 1 I I ,i I I I � � JI
S.W. S T. E.E. 3?D Si. .
� IIIiI lalllll � -- I ! ; . �� 1 il �--� I1( I i
1 � � j i --J ---_- i � ! I I I 1 I II i 1 I i i -
_�_ SUNDY INN __
?, SUNNY ESTATES, 1 15 S.W. 1 zzT \'_.)
?LANNIN:. &ZONING DEPARI4.=Ni
— DCITAI BrSc LK? _JV — tu.> R�- L C:2 •
S sT A FF F R>E P O RAT
HISTORIC PRES`ERVAT,ION _BOARD .s`„
Project Name: COA-374, Saveway Market, Max Nicolas, Owner
Project Location: 139 NW 5th Avenue, West Settlers Historic District.
<r ITEM BEFORE THEE BOARD
The action requested of the Board is that of approval for 2 wall signs to be
located on the north and west elevations of the building.
> tt}JE?Cl I} ESGRI�PTION
Each sign is 10' long and 6' high and will be painted directly on the wall. The wall
color is pink; the border of the signs will be turquoise to match the building trim.
The text will be black. The signs will not be illuminated. The signs are 60 s.f.
each. The sign on the north elevation covers 8.5 % of the facade. The sign on
the west elevation covers 16% of the façade, which in within the City's
guidelines.
STAFF COMMfENTsw . _
The building, owned by Royal Palm Investors of Hollywood, FL, has 3 tenants; a
convenience store on the corner; a tire repair shop in the middle; and a small
office bay to the south_ Pursuant to code the owners are required to provide
minimum landscape requirements and the property was cited in 1993. A
landscape plan was approved and was slightly modified on the site by the City
Horticulturist. However, only a minimum of work has been completed. The
owner has been cited, and is scheduled to come before the Code Enforcement
Board on March 23, 1999_
The building is located on the north gateway corner to the West Settlers Historic
District and is located Ie_s than half a block north of the Spady House. The City
purchased the Spady House for use as a museum and the Division of Historical
Resources, through a special category grant, has contributed more than
$100,000 for its renovation, which is scheduled to begin in a few months.
Additionally, St. Pauls Church, an African-American landmark, is only a few
hundred feet south on the east side of NW 5th Avenue. NW 5th Avenue was
improved with brick sidewalks, trees and street lighting by the City approximately
10 years ago.
The appearance of the building and the condition of the site are inappropriate to
the historic district. Permanent security bars are installed on the windows and
Meeting Date: February 17, 1999
Agenda Item: Ill-B
HPB Staff Report
COA-374
Page 2
operable security gates are also permanent. Staff has spoken to the CRA about
security bars and learned that the CRA will pay half the cost of their removal and
installation of an alarm system.
In view of the above it seems inappropriate to approve the wall signs at this time.
Historically, painted wall signs were common on commercial vernacular
structures, and staff would recommend its installation if the building were
landscaped and the security bars removed. To add a painted wall sign, with the
site and building in its present condition, would compound the problem.
The site improvements will be resolved at the Code Enforcement meeting.
Perhaps it would be possible to recommend to the owner that he work with the
CRA to remove the bars and install an alarm system, thereby enhancing the
structure itself.
I urge you to drive by the site.
; R VIEW BY OTHERS
The Building Department Sign Committee approved the signs at the meeting of
January 29, 1999.
A=LTERNATIVE ACTIONS.
1. Continue with direction_
2. Deny, with reasons stated.
3. Approve as presented_
RE�COroMMENDATIO"N
Based on failure to make positive findings to the Design Guidelines, Signage,
due to the unfinished condition of the site and the inappropriate security bars,
deny the signs as presented.
File/u/ww/coa374sr
1.
• , .
, ..
1..'4"., ' '4.' , ', ','.7."-:.1,1 .,i'rl ';'''‘A,•r* "• . .. •:
• •
• ;
..1;.•.'1‘' ' , r . ---. ..._... ...
:',/ ° ' , ' , ', •, ` ';';'' , ' .
, ,• ''' ',L , I, .
, .
I
. ,, ..•.
s^, ,•,. . ,
0 I .
I . 1
G \JaWC.),`,/
' i,
ICC. 9car IA i I,. . ,, . ,.
...
, t,cAi",
LI •-•,9 i,, ,
13 ea\.,+y 5 u pp I 1/4/ \ , .
,. . ID il
N -.....„...
.,„
, . .if y)
, 1 SIGN REVI
i -4-\\e;-- \- ^C--1 cC- ...„
. ,
. -, ,
PLA REVElf
rieen •
• ELE TRIC
I tP .-•; ',Ne, ' : ' I q •
( '2'g q STA FREVI W
'' '• ':' I i • SPR(kB
, , i, , !, 111Glit,OrY"EgOVAI.
. t rl
\.,1(
•
I a •
a • •
I ' t
, .. ev—__....r.r.....t...----..........4=s42,17,,,_-.0.09r
1 .......
,
, , cq 7 ,-, , _......„....-3
, .
•
4.,e)
,) , nu-e..,
, .
, N
. , .
. .
f
i
•
1:
: ri It ., •.. x‘t
. . j.(---._.. ____ .-- 1
i'
•
i
I
( \
4'
•
..,,,,dh 01, 'di--I SI )7< 7 4'------4kc",.. I 61 q. r 4
•
,,ice.,---,.-- G, ,
•/l I
�) T •
1\i ...,„
1
1J
I
Cii .r.
I
1
. -
at I l I I I I I I I �COMM. BOY TRINITY
CHILD
CARE SCO T LUTHERAN
CENTER LAKE IDA ROAD
--N.W. aTH ST.
ICASON
- METHODIST
CHURCH
i
S.D. SPADY
ELEMENTARY N.W. ,,-D C I.
SCHOOL
a a a a a
N.W. 3RD ST.
— 4i
— >
w a
__ a
—a.l d
>
—a
— CITY
ATTORNEY
— BUILDING
I I 1 VI
VI
I
MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DRIVE
U-
o -
Z
•
O.__
_ _r
4"N---
—rn _
—" - Z CITY
MI HALL
az
1 v
__,
N.W. 1ST ST.
J
z
y
_z z z 3 COMMUNITY
z z z CENTER
FIRE
- I STATION
TENNIS
-_ STADIUM
JI AMOCO NO. 1
ATLANTIC AVENUE
w —w LJ POLICE SOUTH
1.i Effifil a I < COMPLEX COUNTY
I I- I COURT
°' r, to ,r' HOUSE
w �; J w w Lv
UI :ri vj Uf N U)
N
--000- M & J SAVEWAY
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FL
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
-- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM320
tx
HISTORIC PR -SERVATION B'DAR 3ME1'�t[ORRANDUi�It"
Subject: Agenda items for the workshop scheduled for
Wednesday, February 24, 1999.
Please consider the items you wish to have placed on the workshop agenda. It
will be helpful if you list them in order of priority so that we can tally them at the
meeting.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Meeting Date: February 17, 1999
Agenda Item: IV