The URL can be used to link to this page

HPB-05-12-1999 DELRAY BEACH Itakd All-AmericaCity ' 1 I ! AGENDA 1993 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: May 5, 1999 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286.0105. THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING HAS BEEN POSTPONED TO WEDNESDAY MAY 12, 1999. • Pat Cayce Historic Preservation Planner POSTED ON: April 28, 1999 l DEIRAY BEACH All-America City 1993 AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: May 12, 1999 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286.0105. 1. CALL TO ORDER (Roll Call) IL APPROVAL OF MINUTES • April 21, 1999 III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. COA-366-Continuation: 123 N.E. 1st Avenue, Contributing Single Family Residence, Old School Square Historic District. Jerry Vanhille, Owner. Consider a Two Story Addition to the Rear of the Existing Building. B. COA-9-373-Continuation: 10 SE 1st Street, Contributing Single Family Residence, Old School Square Historic District. Nauplius Limited, Owner; Michelle Balfourt, Architect and Authorized Agent. Consider the Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Design Elements Associated with the Conversion of the Property from Residential to Commercial. E HPB Meeting May 12, 1999 Page 2 C. Coa-9-382, Vacant Parcel: Lot 24, Block 11, Del-Ida Park Historic District. 250 Professional Building, Dr. John Westine, Owner. Consider the Site Plan and Landscape Plan for a Proposed Parking Lot Associated with the 250 Professional Building. D. COA-9-382: 34 N. Swinton Avenue, Contributing Single Family Residence, Old School Square Historic District. Eric Carlstrom, Owner. Consider Approval for Renovation Which Includes Windows, Doors, Roof, Porch and Exterior Paint Colors. E. COA-9-381-Continuation: 242 N. Swinton Avenue, Contributing Single Family Residence, Old School Square Historic District. Sally Gebo, Owner. Consider Approval for Dimensional Aluminum Windows to Replace Original Wood Windows. IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Reports from Historic District Representatives B. Board Members C. Staff V. ADJOURN Pat Caybe Historic Preservation Planner POSTED ON: May 6, 1999 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA MEETING DATE: May 12, 1999 LOCATION: First Floor Conference Room I. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Vice-Chairperson at 6:07 p.m. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice-Chairperson Hurlburt, Shane Ames, William Griffin, Mary Lou Jamison, John Johnson, Tony Keller. MEMBERS ABSENT: Debora Turner. STAFF PRESENT: Claire Lyte-Graham. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: It was moved by Mr. Keller and seconded by Mr. Ames to approve the minutes from the April 21, 1999, and passed 6-0. III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: A. COA 9-366 Continuation 123 N.E. 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic Arts District, Jerry Vanhille Staff presented the item before the Board. The architect for the project stated that in order to address the Board's previous concerns with the massing of the proposed addition, a section of the addition was extended out on the north elevation to provide a cottage look. The proposed banding around the addition will also soften the appearance. With respect to utilizing a hip roof rather than a gable as conditioned by the Board, the architect indicated that the hip is being used due to concerns with respect to undue loading from a structural standpoint. He stressed that from the street if one sees any part of the house it will be the north end. Mr. Keller asked what textures would the house and banding be, and it was indicated that the walls would be textured and the banding smooth for a contrast. The architect stated he plans to install decorative brackets and a frieze board trim band to improve the character of the structure. Mr. Johnson asked for clarification regarding these brackets. The architect stated that the brackets have a level return 2' on center and that the trusses were 2' on center, but did not directly line up. The trusses will not be seen, but the brackets would be visible. Mr. Johnson asked if the shutters on the addition would be operable and hurricane proof, and colors. The architect stated they would be aluminum and operable. The shutters on the existing house are wood Plantation. The owner stated the colors would match the existing house, with teal on white (the house is teal), with a white/gray shingle roof. The Board discussed the hip roof further. Mr. Keller asked if the gable could be . brought down one more truss, and the architect stated he would consider it. Mr. Johnson made a motion to approve COA 9-366 for the colors and shutters, with a recommendation to explore the option of dropping the exposed gable. Mr. Griffin then made a second motion, and the project passed 6-0. The next item COA 9-373 was moved as the applicant had not yet arrived. • B. COA 9-382 Professional Office Building Westine Parking Lot Class V Site Plan, Gerry Church. Staff presented the item before the Board. Mr. Church made the following points with respect to conditions of approval: b The owner will provide access easement, however, he does not want to execute it until the site plan is approved. b An attorney is preparing the Unity of Title. c> The landscape plan is being revised to address the sight visibility issue. b The lighting has been changed to a new decorative fixture in keeping with those utilized by the City. In speaking with the electrical engineer it was indicated that this fixture has been used in several locations in the City. Mr. Keller mentioned that there are currently two boats stored on this lot, and asked if they would continue to be parked there. Mr. Church stated absolutely not. Mr. Ames stated he was not sure if he agreed with the recommendation to convert some of the proposed standard spaces to compact. Mr. Church indicated that the compact spaces were recommended to decrease the waiver requirement for landscape width. However, he would prefer that the standard spaces remain. Vice-Chairperson Hurlburt asked for clarification regarding the purpose of the parking lot, and if it was for overflow. Mr. Church responded yes, and that parking spaces be larger than they are now. ii 5/12/99 Mr. Johnson asked how many handicap spaces are on the existing lot. Mr. Church stated there are two, and that an additional handicap space is being provided on the new lot. Ms. Jamison stated she would like to see the parking lot chained and padlocked at night because her husband is the association president for that neighborhood, and they have received complaints about hanging out and other various activities. Mr. Church asked if they would have to put up a fence. Ms. Jamison stated no, but rather bollards to chain it off to help discourage vagrants. . The Board further discussed the issue of the compact spaces versus the standard spaces. Mr. Church stressed they would prefer to go with the standard spaces. Mr. Ames made a motion to approve the waiver for the north landscape strip from 5' to 3.5', and the south landscape strip from 5' to 4'. Mr. Johnson made a second motion. The waiver was approved on a vote 4-2 (Keller, Hurlburt). Mr. Ames made a motion to approve the site plan. Mr. Griffin made a second motion. The site plan was approved on a vote 5-1 (Keller). Vice-Chairperson Hurlburt repeated the recommendation that Mr. Church look into chaining the parking lot at night, stating this was not a condition of approval but rather a suggestion. C. COA 9-382 34 N. Swinton Avenue, Eric Carlstrom Staff presented the item to the Board. Mr. Caristrom stated he is eager to replace the windows because people have been breaking into the house. He indicated he has explored the possibility of restoring the windows, but felt that the cost of restoring them would be equivalent to purchasing new ones, and felt it would be cost effective to install new windows. He stated he has had difficulty deciding on colors, and colors on the chart match colors proposed for house, except the green on the roof is darker. He chose colors to make the house stand • out, not blend, but he does have another color scheme that is similar to that of the CRA building. He has also considered the colors of houses down the street (Sundy House). He has considered a peach and teal color scheme. However, he has not had a chance to meet with the roofer and is therefore not comfortable with making a definite decision on the color scheme. Vice-Chairperson Hurlburt stated they could vote on the windows so he can start working. Mr. Caristrom stated he plans to open up the porch in the rear. Mr. Johnson asked about the balustrades. Mr. Caristrom replied that he was not going to do balustrades, and just wanted a walk up porch. He stated that people have been sleeping on the porch for some time. iii 5/12/99 Mr. Ames inquired if the house would be converted. Mr. Carlstrom stated he did not know and at this time was restoring the house as a residence. Vice-Chairperson Hulburt asked if he could come back later with colors and roof sample, and he stated yes. Mr. Ames recommended that he consider using hurricane proof glass for future office conversion. If he does impact glass hurricane shutters will not be necessary. The he can do decorative shutters, but not the expensive hurricane . shutters. Mr. Johnson made a motion to approve the windows, doors, and porch renovation, with the colors, roof, and hurricane protection to be reviewed at a later date. Mr. Ames made a second motion. The Board approved the project 6- 0. • D. COA 9-381 Continuation 242 N. Swinton Avenue, Sally Gebo. Staff presented the item before the Board. Michael McGuire, the contractor representing Ms. Gebo, stated they are using Progressive Glass Technology, windows that are commonly used throughout S. Florida. Mr. McGuire submitted a brochure indicating the type of window to be used. He believed the installation of these new windows would look similar to the new building being constructed nearby. Mr. Johnson inquired if there were other plans for the house. Mr. McGuire • responded by stating that Ms. Gebo is retiring in Delray, and that colors have been approved. He stated they would like to replace the roll down awning with a canvas awning like the house next door and put up hurricane shutters for the • subject windows. Mr. Keller stated he understands which houses have the PGT windows, but wondered if this is in keeping with the guidelines, and if this the direction in which the Board wants to go. He questioned should there be different standards for different houses/projects. Mr. McGuire referred to similar aluminum windows on two houses nearby. Mr. Keller stated one of the houses was relocated. Mr. Keller did not know if the windows at 246 N. Swinton were permitted. Vice-Chairperson Hurlbut stated that the last time this project was discussed it was hoped that the applicant could work with the original windows. Mr. Johnson asked if these windows would change the existing openings. Mr. McGuire stated the openings would remain as similar as the manufacturer and code compliance would allow. Mr. Ames made a motion to approve the iv 5/12/99 windows. Ms. Jamison made a second motion and the Board approved the project 6-0. E. COA 9-373 Class V Site Plan, 10 S.E. 1st Street. Staff presented the item before the Board. The Board elected to table the project because the applicant was not present and there were questions regarding the porch of the house to remain, as well as elements of continuity along Swinton Avenue. . IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS: A. Reports from the Historic District Representatives None B. Board Members None C. Staff None V. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 7:10 p.m. v 5/12/99 The undersigned is the Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the information provided herein is the Minu s of the meeting of said body for, which were formally adopted by the Board on Z , 1999. If4he Minutes you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review . and approval, which may involve some changes. • vi 5/12/99 STAFF R" EP O RT HIST"O.R.ICr PRESERVATION BOARD` Project Name: COA-366, Jerry Vanhille Project Location: 123 N.E. 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District ITEM BEF ORE THE B OA RD The action requested of the Board is that of approval for a two-story addition on the rear of a contributing single family residence. BACKG.!ROUND, The house is a wood frame vernacular constructed in 1924. The original front porch was enclosed-and a room was added to the southeast corner in the 1950s. The applicant renovated the house in 1990 and the garage was constructed several years later. The proposal to construct a 34' x 24' (1,632 s.f.) two-story addition to the rear of the single-family residence was reviewed by the Board on December 2, 1998. At that meeting the Board continued the item with the following comments and direction to the applicant: The addition's proposed hip roof is out of character with the existing gable roof. As viewed from the front, the hip roof is inappropriate to the historic structure and gives an unsympathetic appearance to the addition. The Board felt that a gable roof, running north and south, to replicate the existing as opposed to the hip roof, would be more appropriate. Additionally, incorporating a front facing opposing gable to the new roof would echo the existing porch gable and improve the massing of the addition as viewed from the street. Also, the Board felt that the addition could be further differentiated from the existing by moving the walls of the addition a few inches in or out to establish a break in the wall plane. The revised plans were presented to the Board at the meeting of February 3, 1999. After discussion, and after hearing the architect's presentation, the Board felt that the addition was still too massive, box-like and out of scale with the existing residence. The Board continued to express concern that the hip roof was incompatible with the gable roof of the historic house. The Board voted to continue the item to allow the architect to digest the board's comments and discuss them with the owner, who was not present at the review. Meeting Date: May 12, 1999 Agenda Item: Ill-A HPB Staff Report COA-366-Continuation Page 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The 34' x 24' (1,632 s.f.) two-story addition will be connected to the existing garage by a 7 x 14' laundry room and a breezeway. The addition will accommodate a family room, office and bath on the 1st floor and a master bedroom and bath on the 2nd floor. A 7' x 26' balcony will be constructed on the rear of the second floor addition, which will be accessed by French doors from the bedroom. The addition's roof will be covered in dimensional asphalt shingles. The walls will be stucco to match the existing residence. Windows will be single hung sash factory finished white with snap in muntins. French doors on the second floor rear will also be factory finished white aluminum. The addition will be painted to match the existing residence. The proposed addition requires the demolition of an 11' x 13' room (previously added) on the southeast corner of the existing residence; and a 4' x 8' utility shed on the northeast corner. Neither is original to the contributing structure. PROJECT ANALYSIS Compliance with the Land Development Regulations; Development Matrix. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4 the maximum lot coverage is 40% with a minimum non-vehicular open space requirement of 25%, in the OSSHAD zoning district. This proposal provides 34.8% of lot coverage with 26.3% of open space; therefore it conforms to the requirements of Section 4.3.4. Conformity with the Design Guidelines The Design Guidelines state that new additions should be differentiated so that the addition and the existing are clearly of two different times, yet complimentary. Locating the addition at the rear, or an inconspicuous side, and limiting the size and scale in relationship to the existing structure is essential. If new additions such as balconies are being considered, they should be on non-character defining elevations. Additional levels should be set back from the existing structure's wall plane, and be placed as not to radically alter the historic appearance of the building. • The proposal conforms to the Guidelines as the original structure and the addition are differentiated by the 6" width addition on either side of the footprint of the new construction, as the Board recommended. • The addition conforms to the Guidelines as it is located at the rear and the balcony is also located to the rear, a non-character defining elevation. , HPB Staff Report COA-366-Continuation Page 3 • The second floor level of the addition is set back 58' from the front property line and from the front wall of the house by the depth of the structure, 40', and is, therefore, in conformity. • The existing house is approximately 1115 s.f; the addition is 1632 s.f. This is a large addition compared to the size of the original structure. However, the Board has approved additions of this proportion and more in the past. The Board did not object to the size of the addition, rather it was the massing that caused the Board to judge that it was not in conformity with the Guidelines. For that reason, the Board suggested that reconfiguring the hip roof to an east/west gable roof would bring the massing into conformity with the Guidelines. The first set of revised plans which were reviewed by the Board on February 3, 1999 incorporated the following items: • A gable louvered attic vent centered on the west elevation of the hip roof to echo the gable of the enclosed porch roof. • Exposed rafter tails on all four sides of the addition's roof, with decorative brackets at the four corners of the roof. The following modifications have been added to the above elements. However, the hip roof, which influences the massing of the addition and its relationship to the existing residence, remains the principle feature of the front elevation of the addition. West Elevation (front) • A window, with window box and shutters, has been added to the second story. • A 1' interruption is indicated on the north line of the hip roof. North Elevation • An 11' section of the wall at the northwest corner of the second story has been bumped out 6" from the balance of the north wall. The projection will have corner boards, lower bracing, and will be capped with an opposing gable or hip roof. The window will have a window box and shutters. An 18" raised stucco band will be applied between the first and second stories on the north, south and east elevations. r HPB Staff Report COA-366-Continuation Page 4 The existing residence is 1,155 s.f., which is modest by today's standards. In order to encourage residential uses in the OSSHAD zoning district, it is essential that structures be modified or expanded to be compatible with modern living conditions. Additionally, the OSSHAD regulations specify residential uses shall comprise no less that 10% of the uses in the district. With the expanding conversion of residential properties to commercial, it is necessary to continue to improve the existing residential inventory. In view of the fact that the applicant has twice revised the original plans, he does not want the Board to consider "continue with direction" as an option and requests that the Board either approve or deny the project. � . ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Approve as presented, based upon positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(E) and the Design Guidelines 2. Approve, based upon positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(E) and the Design Guidelines, with the following condition: • That an east/west gable roof replace the proposed hip roof. 3. Deny with reasons stated. RECOMMENDATION Approve, based upon positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(E) and the Design Guidelines, with the following condition: • That an east/west gable roof replace the proposed hip roof. File/u/ww/coa366sr-3 --...-------..----.-----.----,.s,...„ . . - ... . * . ...-.....- ..-....`--.....11......./..‘....„.....„... „...oe-r7.-7... -. : . ............„..., ..........--....... .. il „....e*,..*.....-.--......... .• - I W.F.:r '...•L --.... __ • .....,, ----,, V-,---.11", 11-7.--11- -11 1.1 U -11* 11 - 11• 11 - 11 " II . Iv .... ti_ .27-.__-.-117---7.*-ii-- -• -1-1- V, ") )i , F 1 • • -- - ... 11-...._7_11 ir 77 I I J - •- . ri:',,,A. • ::::. .... .... _ i . ........ ..f.",,,......... II - - ---- ..--.): „.....-- ,...,...- ......:-....."- .........- . . -I -r--'" ..--.' I.--, to.),f DA: , - -- - -- - - - --- , •r•d;') ' 1.1 . __;_ ly ''i-i • •\V E 3 T , • E L.i:-:: VAT I CO 11 _......., ij.-i" e...1!aq 'T � in _tj ' ' — -- -- -- -- —' |-- -- T I G ._ A DD/-F | (zN _______^___________ E IleLSl-/HQ ~°~ U \ ~ 1, .. .. i i . . .?,,.. . „• ii,t 1 [.. i.' I 1 , . . , , , . . ., , . 1 [.. • . lik ,)1, ,,. .'h Pt ..„ ,...., to .. . , I . 0. _. ... ... . ........ .. TRINITY i I I I I I I L ; 1 I 1 ~ L U T-fERAN LAKE IDA ROAD l ` N.E. dTH Sr. POST Iq I I �! { CASON — OFFICE I I I l o1 METHODIS I I f CI I I CHURCH I 11 I 1 I I i Ij I I I Iw 1 i I W I i <Li w I D z I I ^� N.W. 3RD ST. W N.E. 3RD I Si.i > W < 1 I ai I I ! I < Q I _ I I 1 I lol hilliCI CITY Il I gt 11 , ATTORNEY I 1 I BUILDING I 1 I I �—_I I ILJ� III I MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DRIVE N.E. n `n ,- IIII I I 2ND I I--� " z Ilk I I - / I 3 C1 i Y I I` HALL U) MI I ) / I N.W. 1ST ST. N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST I ST. __Iw lui . COMMUNITY CENTER TENNIS OLD STADIUM ADIUM I SCHOOL ��777 ^c SQUARE J z I T ATLANTIC AVENUE POLICE SOUTH .C. < > cII7____;.w COMPLEX CUNTY 2 _< • COUP,I rs, !.' ' N )- HOUSE I w L i '/ ; N N L.,,N (A N I. 1 N JEROME VANHILLE PROJECT CITY OF DELRAY REACH. FL 123 N.E. 1ST AVENUE PLANNING& ZONING DCPARTUENT -- D/GIAL BASE,u4P SYSiIX -- w.P REF: LM2S9 . , r HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD -TY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: May 12, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: lll.B. ITEM: Consideration of COA 9-373 Which Incorporates Class V Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan and Engineering Plan for a Two-Phase Project located at the Southeast Corner of S.E. 1st Street and Swinton Avenue. ---1 uu Li N.E. uu I I MIN.W. 2ND Si. E. 2ND Si. CITY HALL GENERAL DATA: .1 N.W. 1ST ST N.E. 1ST ST, -W Owner Nauplius Limited COMMUNITY" o —rv^ z Applicant/Agent John Szerdi &Associates CENTER - w Location Southeast corner of S.E. 1st a OLD Street and Swinton Avenue I ScrrDDL w SDUARE Z = =pertySize 0.43 Acre ATLANTIC AVENUE Future Land Use Map Other Mixed Use Current Zoning OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) - Adjacent Zoning North: OSSHAD East: OSSHAD < South: OSSHAD 11I West: OSSHAD S.W. 1ST ST. S��Epp 1ST ST. Existing Land Use Two single family residences I I '``'W Z N Proposed Land Use Phase one involves a unity of title - o — for lots 20, 21 & 22, Block 70, . — N Demolition of one single family z - ,_ residence located at 6 S.E. 1st I III 3 — U) Street, addition of a parking lot S.W. 2ND ST. S.E. 2ND ST. and landscaping. Phase two involves the restoration of the 111111 y remaining single family residence I 1 W A in located at 10 S.E. 1st Street and I i iri conversion of use from residential I . 1 to commercial. — - I N I i S.W. 3RD ST. S.E. 3RD ST. I,Water Service Existing on site. — —I— Sewer Service Existing on site. I " i II -- I ' IILB. 9 . • .IT.EM .BE.F,ORETHE= BOARD The action before the Board is approval of COA-9-373, which incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal as they pertain to 10 SE 1st Street, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F): O Site Plan; O Architectural Elevations; and O Landscape Plan. The subject property is located at the southeast corner of Swinton Avenue and SE 1st Street, within the Old School Square Historic Arts District. BACK.GROUND:. The subject property involves Lots 20-22, Block 70, Sundy and Cromer's subdivision plat containing 0.43 acres. The vernacular style single-family dwelling located on Lots 20 and 21 (6 SE 1st Street) was built in 1912. It stood vacant for several years in the early 1990's. During the years that it was vacant, the Chief Building Official had concerns about it being an unsafe structure and recommended that it be condemned and demolished. However, in 1995, the building was sold and the new owner planned to renovate and restore the structure. The new owner could not arrange the necessary financing for renovation and the house continued to deteriorate. The current applicant purchased the lots in 1998. The vernacular style single family dwelling located on Lot 22 (10 SE 1st Street) was built in 1913 and is in good condition. With the Citywide Rezoning associated with the adoption of the Land Development Regulations in October, 1990, the parcel was rezoned RM-10 (Multiple Family Residential — 10 du/ac) to OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic District) On February 3, 1999, the Historic Preservation Board approved the demolition of the dwelling located at 6 SE 1st Street with a condition that the house not be demolished until a site plan was approved for the subject property. The applicant wishes to convert the dwelling located at 10 SE 1st Street to a general retail use with the associated parking to be situated on Lots 21 and 22. _ PROJECT ::D ES,C-R.1 PI'1 O-N The development proposal incorporates the following: • The structure located along Swinton Avenue (6 SE 1st Street) is to be demolished and 1,373 square foot structure located at 10 SE 1st Street is to be converted from residential to a commercial use. ' 7 SPRAB Staff Report • 10 SE 1st Street—COA-9-373 Page 2 • Construction of a 20 space parking lot with access from SE 1st Street and the alley which is situated along the south side of the property; • Installation of a brick sidewalk along SE 1st Street along with the installation of brick • pedestrian walkways and handicap ramps internal to the site. Brick pavers are also • • • proposed for that portion of the driveway that is located between the parking spaces and the edge of pavement along SE 1st Street; • Elimination of the existing curb cut along Swinton Avenue and connection of the two existing landscape island located within Swinton Avenue; • • Installation of decorative site lighting; • Installation of a trash enclosure (rear of structure) that is to be situated behind the existing wood fence; • Interior modifications to include the conversion of a standard restroom to a handicap restroom; • Repainting the existing building to match existing colors (white with green trim) ; and • Installation of associated landscaping. T. E .PLAN_TA.NALYSIS • COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be • addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. LDR Section 4.3.4(K) Development Standards Matrix: • The following table indicates that the proposal complies with LDR Section 4.3.4(K) as it pertains to the OSSHAD zone district: Required Provided Building Height 35' 18' Building Setbacks Front (Swinton Ave) 25' 120' Side Street (SE 1st Ave) 15' 33' Side Interior 7.5' 39' Rear 10' 10' Open Space 25% 51% SPRAB Staff Report 10 SE 1st Street—COA-9-373 Page 3 - LDR Section 4.4.24(H) (OSSHAD —Special District Regulations): Pursuant to Section 4.4.24(G)(3) (Front Yard Parking), all parking, except for single-family homes and duplexes, shall be located in the side or rear year or adjacent to a rear alley. No such parking shall be located in the area between the street and the building. However, where there are existing buildings, the Historic Preservation Board may waive this requirement during the site plan review process, provided that it is determined that compliance is not feasible and that the residential character of the area will be maintained. If approved, such parking shall be substantially screened from off-premises view by a hedge or fence. The proposed parking lot is located between Swinton Avenue and the existing building. Thus, the parking lot is located in the front yard and encroaches into the side yard. In order to mitigate any potential impacts of having a parking lot at a highly visible intersection a 26' landscaped area is proposed which will contain a 3' high undulating berm and substantial landscaping to screen the parking area. Based on the above, it is appropriate for the Board to waive this requirement. Pursuant to Section 4.4.24(G)(4) Parking Requirements: All non-residential uses with the exception of restaurants, shall provide one parking space per 300 square feet of total new or existing floor area being converted to non-residential use. The existing 1,373 square foot structure is required to provide 5 parking spaces [1,375 divided by 300 square feet = 4.57 or 5 spaces], and 20 spaces are provided. The additional parking spaces are being constructed on this property to accommodate required parking for the future conversion of the residential properties located to the north. Right-of-Way Reduction: Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.1(D) right-of-way dedications to meet minimum standards must be made with all developments. Pursuant to the Transportation Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan, the required right-of-way width for SE 1st Street is 55' and only 50' currently exists. Therefore, a dedication of 2.5' is required of this development. A reduction in the required right-of-way width for an existing street may be approved by the City Engineer upon a favorable. recommendation from the Development Services Management Group (DSMG) [REF: Section 5.3.1(D)(4)]. DSMG was in favor of this reduction and the City Engineer waived the requirement. Lighting: Site lighting locations and fixture details have been indicated on the site plan as well as the landscape plan. A photometric plan has also been provided that meets or exceeds the requirements outlined in LDR Section 4.6.8. The decorative cast aluminum fixture consists of a tapered octagonal lamp on a decorative post and base. The maximum height of the fixture may not exceed 25'. This must be noted on the plans as well as the photometric plan, which has been attached as a condition of approval. SPRAB Staff Report 10 SE 1st Street—COA-9-373 Page 4 ' OTHER - ITEMS Declaration of Unity of Title: The development proposal includes improvements across property lines (Lots 20-22). As the properties will be under one ownership and function as one development, it is appropriate to combine the properties through a Declaration of Unity of Title, which must be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit. This item has been attached as a condition of approval. Brick Paver Sidewalk: At the intersections along Swinton Avenue, the City has developed a plan to replace the existing, concrete sidewalks with brick pavers and provide a "period" street lamp. In addition to the installation of a paver block sidewalk along SE 1st Street, the plans indicate that a 10' - section of the concrete sidewalk along Swinton Avenue, approximately 5' south of the intersection will be replaced with a brick paver sidewalk. This section of the brick sidewalk should connect to the proposed brick sidewalk along SE 1st Street. This item has been attached as a condition of approval. LAN.DSCAPE :ANALYSIS The two landscape nodes located within Swinton Avenue adjacent to the subject property are to be connected to provide one continuous island. A Coconut Palm and Live Oak tree are proposed and will be under planted with Jasmine. The proposed plant material is consistent with the existing plant material within the landscape nodes. The existing Banyan tree at the northwest corner of the site will be retained. Within the 26'wide landscape buffer that is to be situated between the property line and parking lot, a 3' high undulating berm is proposed. On top of the berm, 2 Mahogany trees, a Royal Poinciana tree, and a Sapodilla tree are proposed. They are to be under planted with large massings of Glory Bush, Variegated Ginger, and Philodendron. The parking lot is to be screened along the north and south sides with Surinam Cherry and Cocoplum. Within the terminal landscape islands located along the south side of the parking lot Gumbo Limbo tress are proposed. Two Pigeon Plum trees are proposed within the landscape island located on the west side of the parking lot. The landscape island located on the east side of the parking lot is to receive two Geiger trees and Jasmine groundcover. Foundation plantings consists of Glory Bush and Crinum Lilies. Ligustrum trees are proposed along the north and south sides of the building. The existing landscape material located on this lot is to be retained. DESIGN ELEMENTS ANALYSIS As previously stated, at its meeting of February 3, 1999, the Historic Preservation Board approved the demolition of the house located at 6 SE 1st Street. The development proposal includes the following design elements, which require analysis with respect to compatibility with the existing structure at 10 SE 1st Street. SPRAB Staff Report 10 SE 1st Street—COA-9-373 • Page 5 Architectural Elevations: Constructed in 1913, the house is vernacular in style. It is of frame construction with horizontal wood siding on a pier foundation. The pyramid style roof with exposed rafter tails is an interesting design element. The building retains most of its original window openings, windows and shutters. The front porch has been inappropriately enclosed with siding and aluminum windows and door. The porch enclosure has had a drastic impact on the front of the building and detracts from its historic integrity. The applicant is not proposing any exterior alterations at this time, and wishes to repaint the building with its original colors, white with green trim. While it is not recommended that porches be enclosed, it is a common practice to create additional living or working space. If a porch must be enclosed, all original materials and details should be maintained. This includes railings, porch supports, brackets, etc. The porch should maintain an open look and feel. For this reason a large amount of glass should be utilized. If windows, as opposed to solid glass panes, were used to enclose the porch they would be architecturally appropriate to the home. The use of architecturally compatible windows and doors are most important. Staff recommends that the porch enclosure be removed. If at a later date it is necessary to enclose the porch, it can be done in an appropriate and aesthetically enhancing manner. This item has been attached as a condition of approval. REQUIRED FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to the following areas: Section 3.1.1 (A) - Future Land Use Map: The subject property has a Future Land Use Map designation of OMU (Other Mixed Use), and is currently zoned OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic District). Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.25, within the OSSHAD zoning district retail sales (specialty shops) are allowed as a permitted use. Based upon the above, it is appropriate to make a positive finding with respect to consistency with the Future Land Use Map designation. Section 3.1.1 (B) - Concurrence: As described in Appendix A, a positive finding of concurrency can be made as it relates to water, sewer, streets and traffic, drainage, parks and recreation, open space, and solid waste. SPRAB Staff Report 10 SE 1st Street—COA-9-373 Page 6 Section 3.1.1 (C) - Consistency (Standards for Site Plan Actions): As described in Appendix B, a positive finding of consistency can be made as it relates to Standards for Site Plan Actions. Section 3.1.1 (D) - Compliance with the Land Development Regulations: As described under the Site Plan Analysis of this report, a positive finding of compliance with the LDRs can be made, when all outstanding items attached as conditions of approval are addressed. Comprehensive Plan Policies: A review of the objectives and policies of the adopted Comprehensive Plan was conducted and no applicable objectives or policies were noted. Section 2.4.5 (F)(5) - Compatibility (Site Plan Findings): The approving body must make a finding that development of the property pursuant to the site plan will be compatible and harmonious with adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole, so as not to cause substantial depreciation of property values. The subject property is surrounded by the OSSHAD zoning district. The surrounding land uses are to the west the Sundy Inn and to the north, south and east by single family residences. There are no compatibility concerns noted with this development proposal as the same zoning district surrounds it. The demolition of the house located at 6 SE 1st Street and the conversion of the adjacent home to a retail use promotes the Purpose and Intent as outlined in OSSHAD. This is accomplished by improving the environmental quality and overall livability of the Historic District by stabilizing and improving the property value, and promotes preservation through the adaptive reuse of a structure in the district. REVIEW BY OTHERS The development proposal is not located in an area which requires review by the DDA (Downtown Development Authority). . Community Redevelopment Agency: The CRA board considered this project at its meeting of April 22, 1999 and unanimously approved the project. Courtesy Notice: A courtesy notice was sent to Old School Square Homeowners Association. Letters of objection or support, if any, will be presented at the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board meeting. SPRAB Staff Report 10 SE 1st Street—COA-9-373 ` Page 7 ASSESS,MENT "`AND . CON.:CLUSION. . The development proposal is to demolish an existing single family residence, convert a single family residence to a retail use, and installation of required parking. It is recommended that the porch enclosure be removed with this development proposal. If at a later date it is necessary to enclose the porch to provide additional working space; the enclosure can be done in an appropriate and aesthetically enhancing manner. The development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Chapter 3 of the Land Development Regulations. A finding of compatibility can be made once all the conditions of approval have been addressed. ;ALTERNATIVE :,ACTI'ONS .... A. Continue with direction. B. Approve COA-9-373-for the Class V site plan, landscape plan and architectural elevations for 10 SE 1st Street based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards), and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Finding of Compatibility) of the Land Development Regulations and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to conditions. C. Deny COA-9-373 site plan, landscape plan, and architectural elevations with basis stated. STAFF RECOMMENDATION By Separate Motions: WAIVER: Approve a waiver to LDR Section 4.4.25 (G)(3) to allow the parking to be placed in the front yard between the street and building and encroach into the side yard. Site Plan: • Approve COA-9-373 for the Class V site plan for 10 SE 1st Street based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards), and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Finding of Compatibility) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to the following conditions: 1. That the Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. That the brick sidewalk be extended from SE 1st Street, 10' south to provide a continuous brick sidewalk at the intersection. SPRAB Staff Report - ' 10 SE 1st Street—COA-9-373 Page 8 3. That the lighting fixtures not exceed 25' in height and that a note to that effect be provided on the plans and photometric plan. Landscape Plan: Approve COA-9-373 for the landscape plan for 10 SE 1st Street based on positive findings with respect to Section LDR 4.6.16 of the Land Development Regulations. Design Elements: Approve COA-9-373 for design elements for 10 SE 1st Street based on positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1 and 4.6.18 with a condition that the porch enclosure be removed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the parking lot. • Attachments: • Appendix A • Appendix B • Site Plan • Landscape Plan • Design Elements APPENDIX A...,. :., CONCU,RR,ENCY,_F`1:NDING.S Pursuant to Section 3.1.1(B) Concurrency as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs of the requested land use and/or development application will not exceed the ability of the City to fund and provide, or to require the provision of, needed capital improvements for the following areas: Water and Sewer: With respect to water and sewer service, the following is noted: O Water service is provided to the building via a service lateral connection to an 8" main located within NE 1St Street. O Sewer service is provided to the site via a service lateral connection to an 8" main located within the alley. O Adequate fire suppression is provided to the site via a fire hydrant, which is located at the southeast corner of Swinton Avenue and SE 1St Street. Pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan, treatment capacity is available at the City's Water Treatment Plant and the South Central County Waste Water Treatment Plant for the City at build-out. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to this level of service standard. Streets and Traffic: A traffic analysis has been prepared indicating that the conversion from single family to commercial will general 106 Average Daily Trips. The subject property is located within the TCEA (Traffic Concurrency Exception Area), which encompasses the CBD, OSSHAD, CBD-RC, and West Atlantic Avenue Business Corridor. The TCEA exempts the above described areas from complying with Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. Based on the above, a positive finding with respect to traffic concurrency can be made. Parks and Recreation Facilities: Park dedication requirements do not apply for non-residential uses. Thus, the proposed development will not have an impact with respect to this level of service standard. Solid Waste: Trash generated each year by the 1,373 square foot retail use will be 10.2 pounds per square foot per year or 7 tons of solid waste per year. The Solid Waste Authority has indicated that it has no objections to projects that generate less then 10 tons of solid waste per year. Therefore, a positive finding with respect to Solid Waste can be made. Drainage: Drainage will be accommodated on site via sheet flow into sodded swale areas. There are no problems anticipated complying with South Florida Water Management District or Lake Worth drainage District requirements. APPENDIX B STANDARDS FOR. SITE PLAN ACTIONS A. Building design, landscaping, and lighting (glare) shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent B. Separation of different forms of transportation shall be encouraged. This includes pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles in a manner consistent with policies found under • Objectives D-1 and D-2 of the Transportation Element. Not.applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent - C. Open space enhancements as described in Policies found under Objective B-1 of the Open Space and Recreation Element are appropriately addressed. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent D. The City shall evaluate the effect that any street widening or traffic circulation modification may have upon an existing neighborhood. If it is determined that the widening or modification will be detrimental and result in a degradation of the • neighborhood, the project shall not be permitted. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent E. Development of vacant land which is zoned for residential purposes shall be planned in a manner which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent F. Vacant property shall be developed in a manner so that the future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; complementary to adjacent land uses; and fulfills remaining land use needs. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent G. Redevelopment and the development of new land shall result in the provision of a variety of housing types which shall continue to accommodate the diverse makeup of the City's demographic profile, and meet the housing needs identified in the Housing Element. This shall be accomplished through the implementation of policies under Objective B-2 of the Housing Element. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent H. The City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent I. Development shall not be approved if traffic associated with such development would create a new high accident location, or exacerbate an existing situation causing it to become a high accident location,without such development taking actions to remedy the accident situation. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent J. Tot lots and recreational areas, serving children from toddler to teens, shall be a feature of all new housing developments as part of the design to accommodate households having a range of ages. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential developments located in the downtown area, and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. • Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent • • _ • _ • — • _ • _ • _S.E.1N STREET _ • — • — BUILDING AND • r-r 1 Ird i ar a• 1 Ird t 41 w-Ir t SITE CALCULATIONS / MICA ,IiI MI6 . LAP rat_ + A1.AInDr DaWO WL�1 d g� GCr^•CI�JEjCPIC gCt.;1�g ^• C-�1nw'ow R .. aai v'.I'1i rater ' ...g I,� F P E�r�tlFgl�� G,y aA a w.p F,F Of g 1.. MOOberao,n.m ni.ar..u� �� ::. ff 1 OWN WM" I if �' , Laly av goy ' ' MG UM v.0e0 PH• Q •o � F°ug911 D aA is rd s�._� 4«u LOOM ur ar.�o 9 F , I § N.a mwx :C7.r I Pub ) 11 1 9FF F'g= ,g fi aF1 I SZERDI Sc .; M D• ;E � I '>@ D I I ASSOCIATES •: L�q Ill p dill':+ 44 ..�.' g �' d• ,4•�,�+ ypp��.in,tl "FgFPF I,4"g I I ARCHITECTS 51_ 41r1 I pys p,atl ?Ftp 6 B�:9iCce9°� 9,pK C6F'SI ,. L,st,s,'. I A. I. A. s•WOW :` inre ll�aX I/F��.kRF j Ii'.p ____ g.pg;l �..�._,,.I PA.�cron rein.anws 1 +;v1 rd IN1w n rs r, t� g'1.Npyd, 1 NaAL.�N Ian V. ]600 K ImOIAL NM'M�D� - I 1 •'VY IIJI uN :p:. 0Jr SLEW IOrK Mu lin v. Cr. 0 S�6E-o i I I i'"`"1 Ii••.hil // dID iw�al oon.lo nNao MOM I!.V SD ar. Vt34-000-111! un arJ we ar..0>..na NeAe ;g'.ct aac a�elv I ,i..•1 it �, rd am 1Man.Nvn mom mum u.+m MM. il"' _/ ;r>,, rf Nr1 :g /.Dou ,• , ar.our ""FY Q"° "�ry g� MOO. 5,;; roQ .a I I ODerp ow. I,,}r L. IA v ^gpa I mrrr.rrw c arm wee 1L10!��N K� ' �irF:.: I g.pt oi"."' 9 C"�� 1r4 I LEGAL DESCRIPTION a rti. ,, ti ll jl7'.I • a I `r/ I j:;�;cYl ► '�7C ^ •.F, wr n.n..00.1.1o�. nxv WWI. }!1�I■ �� I ..� I'll! I a01a a NACCtMnI�.MOM lal F LIKKO ( 1�t• VIOA]e[ a v Mll NiYI .R.ImOlm N fJa I r'�C Irroalwu �g3aE facet NAr�p 7a`vS"Nr°115."`aa'a°"' y,W: Aq MDMa-. C �^ awY> nlpt"�Iit 6�OMWx iml� UATE:9.1 o.vfl /•irt�'• 1 AT vwca y'7 p;I I •I f.45r rd acu , rGpp�F1. I 4 Da.m.�l: i />v�r let waxer �� ClCSli9903 _ ( _ / •f; r�q `�}y� Y •I ➢9 c�':= I ` ` 10 S.E. 1st STREET 01IM rlNepl Y .F,..pO 1 1 "..-4 • _ }• I �4 1 �} bl El • INw io N:rd .11' II/, R { LOT 20h21 ir' r [ �c. g b'' 1::. OWL ROW aYt i 11 CC hi JF•F © . IY o}' 1 20 I ,Cg t• CF"1 bl 'C>T DELR AY FLORIDA BEACH r IA. C e °0;g i I I ` ':.1: 1 11 k g 1 ' y 1LOT 22 ;gg', b l a1 • Ii I ti k g s �q°Q�sr�y� L I s�- J;� ?; 9i:�F4g�GF Di 7 E�SAa. -` \ .Cr gF F ` . roL aNDDui Ptwni�ll - ird 'Ail:. 1 wa l o� a a-r or MI rF aowl I I I` r_:.— , MDn.s 11 "1' rc I �nL rr lau gg g4 —\i riirrslr+s1 \ Olt 0 0 o c o o I ')t.An -- - - SUM r.r-a . .26 _ . �.. . _ . _ . _ R _ ^� _ , s_ _ ;E2Fgh _ _ _ LEGEND SITE PL�N FOR 10 S.E. 11st STREET ¢��9g 6 �, r f's " b _-- \ pp��'E"E WPM 1' 10•.4. ® •- H%N III .__--- CF �� k��p��ip o.n....+..r.. ?';r,+ �; ..r,•t^ssr ar rrF?r mrr .rk T;+ +r! ; « 3 ... �- . s^FFJJ ?r?,+r 3"r f r, flrr'�r% yi%r%y rr+prrr rpr%r^r ^rr rr+rr✓+r'r'rrr r BE. rr<.%rFrr +rrT ,r +i r:"D r^">.r .'r rNjr.r r +•rrr'rrr+rr•. $$:rrrt✓rr^rrr F+rr+br rrr+r rr+rOrr+rr✓•+%rrr r +rr.' , r r'drrr,'+ 'riGr'rr.rrr%ir'yr rrr,,, rrrr r r%rr'r>�+'9^•+ brrr'r rrrr+r,5+^rr pr^.a.6%%i%%%;r'YN rrrr+rrrrr'r °rr.r.rr r r rrrr rr P�r r r r^r.v+rrr+r �+r+r%r,i''r + r%r.,rr r.�r ^� r+%�rC•'S'r rrrr r�Jh r;r,o,r,%rr �+r 'r,A+r r;r 4%r+ r P'� r r r,;f.rr rrrr r rrr(;; ,';+'+rrr rr rrrr%r^".✓r';+rrr rtr:ny rr,'rrr %rr r,tr re rr r•,riirr rrr;^rrr r�F a rr�a.,+ f`' F,' r°rrf rr';:'r,r rrrr rnr',rrrr,,r;r.r',. rrr"•A q•r grrg�rb°r+rE,ddrr:�GirrrrSr�+r ,,�;,,r.;rr+rr r rrror'r,,.� +rdrr /rri: rr+:�r%:'✓rSrr'✓F°.!•rtal rr%°.+r'i„bFdr}rrrr•:+i .!rii%4Prr �':'`/ir5'.+'�rrr;bire:i :�r,?UC„titrr.dv.VA,V.,4,, +tiedi ;ri;M.,,, 4',5%ri<' r+i' S1.:•,4':1'+il+1rFI i".%.4^Fii4%."ors%rf i:�i r'4,1E —] . • I S. SWINTON AVE EXISTING�I, LANDSCAPE PARKING AREA I LANDSCAPE I EXISTING BLDC I OAWM]T g �IQEWAI K I X X k 2.-2" 4'-0 8 1 26'-6" 60'-0" 17'-1" 24'-4" 1 %�-- �"��'r st•rc PLAN wu EAST/WEST SECTION SHOWS RELATIONSHIP or VEHICULAR VIEW OVER PARKIN;AREA TO SEE twortRY or DOSING DWG 0 10 S.E 1leSTREET + I SCALE: 1'.-10•-0• LOCATION NAP A-100 rdn•-••••u.culf N4 w.con aaai --- 0 ama M \ r..Na `� n ! 11 ;El� `'6T?il'r;:,a f ylln.ill 11v 1r Trlw 1 MX MON MM.Ile ma Now NAN �' S.E. 1a!STREET • • am lam sue NOW 10 .ar a IK moor.r. IMa mg.r Rm.memos wpmi:.........::::::. TYPICAL SECTION to r 01"°7 M> a Dal. I awrm aam i I1 T BR)CK PAVERDETAIL S Z E R D I & ASSOCIATES 8TORMWATER RETENTION AREA I M'a I ,,..•.-��.._._. ��00116 .._..,.. u.v lr'olar _ M.w l m,ra wva MN .. /y ��I..o R t,a x�f�. x '~- r"R�a.��;99R I .� ) ARCHITECTS�.aNLalN16O. fN art NON loo r mule\ r`rS •�<C7Y 'en 11 ar 1.a.r f x Irate tine / ' t „t r a-.r aR. wTTm. <` }TE L Pi > f>▪. • 2? ..NY Y rti< L, >• A. I. A. orw.'.M. a=Id rr.r.ar.Awe i ?Tu?,; ..? 27. r T rL t • fl. ... !c < ?fir>lfM << i l • 'cF�l.. a,t h 4L1j 4 t.; h a,g ., i f r>51 2: ,a It{'^+s:`+'$`t Om r r.la'.li•.I=16 r.Naa..w OMNI I IZ.J I 1, { x I ��qprr fan• .Ya� �w INI! 4 p t G I .1. ,,,., ` a'd r.Na 1lM)0 N.rmOtAL RNYp07 Lt.' MMM..t.1.:N...nI=to I r� ®+ux f. 0111 �. 1 1• ®rt,w r4 ` �, :r .r nRona a6h ea en ate rir w�_ .,,,==.a-m �. i?I n 12. G 9 Xn rw rw:-Kaw�.w.... .i'� ?a mum mug MC Ave. cY•♦ ra 1�'1{fit▪ � t..A-- MO... a A :` Ra■ oar-oae �t to ter. .� MIN < nlol •Q5D',! e t`Z � ulo°O"mx.m'M`"".ac..m al! =Mn'-ar.ra.lar a.:,� r4.,..27p G Y Mrmaaooe- Irr•I♦na I . ✓i w4.LOU .r1..a Nola MI v I .1 G f�` m N au. s' v .-� > r. c w..•x roan v ....S...w=2..m.rr t � ff i to w o«®qo.oMm.oMo =•M.n...... al.., II� Y35 �1f<>p��yE�'' .�`fYL �l�Y > i.. {?. metro la`.raaRnoMm�,.=.. ry t}fry r 9.i;<;+''»j'i•�5... <T 'I ,„ , , r1 rweol ear aa..=® _._. . , Il,a >K ' �N« kch,o,url, t .�q�. LEGAL DESCRIPTION �yl� L I .- ,,,y;,{Q1f'py[^i Maanuma.WL.Nrr ML =..n tU Y.J r M.ON.r,.w r MMn.N r ll. ' II (,,,,••••• -O'MW..R.�. y. �\ # ...,ee w`1 Im.4 I./mks.m M Noam M s�M'NO 1r.aRIR�Cr�MR�r+...�, ar III ,n'f II - ,1-p-y_��^ nra alai�RrwocrY . / ,>5: ir®n oRs coal v Iduo�l w oo®o.m•'on®o owit IN r a-I�r....a aM.l.u1 rilI NIIR �r uq�' !�� it s ,//f; / r RN mi a Mi Ir v Iwr i�ul m°fir.IL xum cam c.00....t�r,ly I'+++'r I I 0,, 14,,, M) rROOP aRaoC RL.1 ;�;;Y `w. / ///O R;ar a .m: R000 RN v oa Na alwa'a_ • _ L...r I..taa4...r rrw.sa r qy xA13• wmcIIs{ waI..loami ai r a�oomo Ixwia.,i°I DATE:3.22.9G cox r.corn•�ni..rrl ...... uc a n+oar i2y� / rbRn.R.apu.a..lm.aa.M-R m cowl //Nord.1 w� I INlld lol'..rr..o r.n a aMr mr Nana FM 1•w^„� II ,A ,T� lam ..1. sa°°• ♦ '.a° I`j / !// `/ I•NO Kiolx•I�rww.MOir°•21Mflfl0.3® �I Y t "'"` �j RI �'s/:�.,r.s' € f. Z a`.°a".; .. Ij %f=1'1 1 1' 7/14/ � ©'; =MIEN MIMI..N' �,� 10 S.E. 1st STREET wl avaa lmo wo.o.Nl. to MANIA i '. uaml WC-runs w.acr NW NM I 4`I'I\� ..-- --- r w.r.ow ,I i' ,� / �� © • ♦M0.[Rw.,g nu v•r-r \\` �I 43t .,,.. i'TV 0 NM 11111 11 J !'/ /� `Alm IMO°If.... v I S r.aa....\., aa.w.•RN MINX I ®® ��..'.: •`/?' .7. �J vat¢tµ ryil DELRAY BEACH mi .mina ' 1JL -__ (7.1, fii // sUi6 k.ti rFLORIDAl a) / ia=%1.Nrm scnamN WWI a."IN v Mune ova.=KM la red felm0•011111 OF a..a raw 1+....- J .{�.� 1 mm - y.. / ., .a Ms n..a Doi aum MN• awAMlaoOa < I�I �_ ' t145i 1 �•yay "7 <>�l , ✓/ /K r ..."�N WAIL aw.�TN awasm.la v rmz eow.a W.NanN cos wm waP.allllas• M..aNa•-Na runt ragxi v' Ir 1 s / P+ C• ` •I� va ap-o.raw RN PM. `I Jon ", LOT 20Q21 I� { •\ af�I t .""•��. 1C,. /% SITE CIVIL ENCWEER MI uoml ONVIr.m wN v um.r t.mr .), j I I `��"+�':;`�. '/.// •.14 P. I�;: II II II r .41 ' u.oa ti.a al.Nlr.a x Ilmumoll�"n°r°sa, 1 block 70 ...veal o M..a..,l...Num MVO t rt. 1? 9 \\\, 20 MAYOR �' �}fi •i'b I . . • • ...NM. .w.aayaapmnclm m taoa a I..IW a0.re t.+lm-e0, I'`�... \ + I .m.oc°A�°N MIN 3 LOT f c<r �� A CP PAVEMENT OgTAIL !� I I>;t`,t i q i I W._ �' I +41�1 R..1 11 a ''1 •> '<r"2', t£r>3..'1s,,.: MAUS tnRL a,aL .=+I i,( r 3 �, i, M.RkI NN.R.N.N. ,`r�` llliHb 'I a 1l ,,�.:1 'a„mNrn,Rw. �� t.., LEGEND ® _ yam_ Nt}Y I,.,,YI� r"�'��, f y. I P MINI Ywt �� l 1 ll [IDiNA ..I[ MlMala OON `\`�i11 I'L_ ® ' I T.'-' .,.'1 •< I ... \ 114 ua�R.n .,L. 1I I. t>N aa. to N aw k:. u� i�MOT nem... ana WPM WI ,,.. - largo.a.>ol M.. u ................................ _ ,✓I� 11!1 FlIoMx Mal 1[V MWpr i l Nat>o1 Nr �•• it I y ,.. ' ,.�f+' nvm aarmlaana WE Ur MN 4,- 9.Mal wll„�-, y� g norm . .. O. ._..I�..I� v 5__16„ s_.....st...ii •_.__,r5\._..�pb---5=-•-- '..._.;p r\ �s_�:s—_.s;—• NORTH I o • �arso• III tOI .. ICI ; . W M ii,1 a eAwc1JT Nutt lr DETAIL II .,,,,,. .pl IolN M..I �II NW :•` n SITE PLAN FOR 10 S.E. 1st STREET r ASE ONE SCALE: 1'.10' LOCATION HAP C . : LANDSCAPE DATA MO O Oat CAMIcAPC DATAlb ..... 1 TOTAL RTC ARIA y[�p�.R.pkr) MVO SF TOTAL rem 1,1110or .m.pin) A.D,A ni .':L4A 7 4 - - TOTAL INTERIOR VA N t agi iq 1�i a i i (TOwf MRFO Agm�IM]D.pNS NFA Ht0'�EEp 4143 N pp RN / I I I" S' ll' II�,,/ O Ia143.D 7Da0R iINt11ED.AlIFD 6 OWES JERKY TURNER y tiypp-dpppWW ulg iG94 pp py p�q E°�� LIV��E t�{J�, !a i ' >ma PRIMO Woos^ "m a+"m & ASSOCIATES a �ilIMa7�� is RP++��i�F�� IIMI, a• i);�i �n'r'.Llli'Hi , p 'b!.:.e. .d ,• C;:i,,!E44,E a __.�_',4 ►RAMTCS MNO9PMC DATA It t'6 9^i:. 1 p ai If. eye 1,PAK,OrT AAA ADAAmrT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE I �i 7 #AP. (T To ROMO.1 C11 PII�DTfTTam POIAILTEM LAND PIIJIMHD // �ppp� I KBAq I�tly17 1Cpp� ��. �'.� 77 aygpe TOTAL KM IANDSCAPC WD3Gcc Mu nro�wm him a CNNRONMENTAL DESIGN . • .a �. /�j C��' C'• '�C ii ^'G I,�� , C. !p YTOTAL OWL TROTT MUMS w II T® r 11 v``Q41.,%QO rp 'pl ..1.m Dr Room m AND OEMno ms om'mi'E IA G"""vT ROA°A 2r.a //�,j 111:1 '�i . E .•-� per. i ,�• E^,71Br 6uAo�1 _Q /L� 0.1.NEU I lig .I�.Qtiv C r(�� I,a aa� r Irnwaa tANomrc Auc, ,m a. pqp pppq 'yh{;��7l�.�D1 7.) �W....a. �`ai R mT tr0 / �V I � ,1• 'J'J�'�ll•7s11�� Cpppp 1: �I•' /MW ma PRDJam1133 OF 2n.fi6mf.TArj ::AOw.�1,1 l p j •IHJ�i' � ill�J:' ,C .�-�� l;:E: I a6MY 11-043 r1MiaA SIY]-- 1 Ci 1•'n G NATK►WIT DATA t�1�C � t1/ Al 11 6 ® 0].0 loccwo.•,� eo N OF ALL!COINED TREES W 6C NAME I:� A.• psi, :10 Safi a AIL mien HAAT ES 10 D 70 eC,IAThL "0Sf- - ® '.�.. �... ® ��•,r;{r:ar2. iM m TOTAL R191m, o ,Anrm 10 S.E. FIRST JAS 'ti:,.7..07414.10 l��'i,t`\,♦ �Q ,�, 0 tmAi NARK TVlC R0.11® T TI®O �,0 - IaTK NATK Tlma 1ltawllD .,� STREET,� © al- , • larA1 Irm.Rm.xRu AIM CROWD alp,AAAmY V. :i NATK AMA R@.Rm Ua P 0 1,�� ,a 3 Q l. e� I NATK NSA ARM D In.F i.1.1�1 3 C o 1kt�r.c's`� oiL v i 4 I PLANTING NOTES: Are • NerI '0'.*'tOrk , I' (I, All pl 1 materials Y,dl oanronn to the Rtmdab kr FMddo No.1 bete.a . :i Mar Dl'Qodw a,d STndade far Nurr.y PMnb Part I.Feervery 1990. © _ i tx $ot.ornaaaDeparn!aTaaAIT' 0 :.y' 1 `•4. \ 1 [: k, M end.ha6 be d.m and rro.onl4y fro o1 mods and pots a db.... v t: , �`A•_Tll ® !. 0 All lond.om.arms not on. RTk trw,.hM.or pound mnz.fool I. lplrir`i� + iiiI :I 1 sodded r h sb Aa9a.em FwTtan d.�on..1..nal.d O 1 f.fr ' ► �. I:?a <I; AA lane.ome areas shin be mulched to prowe a ranDmon of a•aaa.A I :� ra. `�, Ate/ -- :C' , I OAadlptu.mulch. �, �IO �''� �_I,�':�:i� 'i i ,tl / 1, Leatractar n all.ler locating oil une d ulntl.. dor w 0 3i�/� 4 •I CI J ••m•^ 9 �treur' p De rOy Beach, FL �� /� lull'.-ve ;, I /� II hddlotlan of pbnlhp mat.Ws to ovoid danopr. p 7 1917#&�L_-_,_ �04/ y1 t.,7 a Contractor I.to furnish m reotertole..a om L Mbar and plants as requbed to 4/23/99 0 y .a1,,r/ ' .1111r. 3;C O i hdae M.carp..panting a h«law n Va Ialeseap.plan. ti ■i ` ,►i��li�► © E a 0 nP AS TRW ore to So etched and/or curd a.Indented en to.plaiting«dole 0Fmk 20 , i An pl i!mat to be bacire.d ela.aa,:coo r B/mappraerd conch /f''`t •• ' �° pea!/3 operated bind khr.odd 16 rdr ' :•.. p paid A,li� of 6-6-6 hotline per oWk yard. Tnanrydy mIt m paro pr+ar to platlnp wr _ Ita I g . els;geo RF,.+`y?'e! ® In plans 00t l �r►i,� .''' �I�\,J� ` `,uury The Contractor eoa 10•M M.lawam.01 am pent bd«and contact tin. 0 F •,�. ® ,q� wnd.�.ArmR.ct for mprad b.ror.,b IneWl uon or Ns plait qv /1, �,*+1.A1 1 J I q y7 11.; 'u` , a:M.0ot the Lond.ap.AMMct may edNet N.loculkn of the Mont.bran IX Call _'- )rlw:�U `, 1', , kid llil4 lU:fFl°t:• ?,•TI I,R` .Me 60 ^1�IA O 3 C wntmronatta MM a,plan.:Mhp Intended 10.-oh. 9fal%all a.apo'3. - I V Y 111�r `Wile 1 41 eomr,tin.tarn mnp �ta, to l y d.ape MMINM I.to b roped ra aat6oa prbr ptl(Q, pauD,( biding. 0 I�•.<�+.�� p' " JNa' In(: F O! MY nYtln plmt mal.M to fwnaln.h1A b proleetd Uufi9�at+ualian NIA Mir r'�G� p�''11f to) O a pArMal gartr to w mooed M u,.Land.ame A nte.al Y �l' ; F M lodwaps Wald.and other lad.rw area.that m aliment to rdJabr -�,��cv BB�pl� .nor ae remand b.curbed R tl cena.le nn_nwnlads curbing of •.•.•.•.•.•.• ,•,. Iw.t b Ind..h height. 0001100 00000000 — Th.unpa.,.d pay d tb R..o.p dpc l 4 the Prq�.tI In.and 1e e,. AA l d road.ar ehd b Ind.wpd d t .d and minho .aRA sits®� • .land.1.00 area am to b Irrigated far proNb a mhDnum of 15D[moorage using X.t.efp.pmdplra e D.T DT PLANT LIST �o 1•e10' 3/23/99 pp�q Y/ 1J 17 KEY SdEN11f1C NAME Cd/4t7J NAME OTT HT SP REMARKS p I e7 O O ALP AroM1a mnRTeet'YatD100IO Vargated anger 19 3lY' J6• 42•oc Landscape K 1 1 CD Cwrnloba nIwoHoih Pidgeon Plum 2 12' 6' Native CHY Chryrobalau.hoes'R.dUp' R tq Cacdplum 30 24' 1C HaHw.24•cm al Cocos nudfara'Mayolan' Coconut Palm 1 5'et P I an F.A.S.Fence to Remain CRI CAnum aPatiwm Cdnum L9y 5 36' 36' Nate . CRP Crinum'Purple Uar Purple Uat"um 6 36' 36' CS Cordla eebestna CNcer Trm 2 10' S' Native DR Delnk nigh Rapt Poinciana 1 12' 6' EU Eugenia unlearn Surinam Cherry 23 24' 16' 24•cm IX EXISTING TO RETINH FIR Hamdla paten. F1r. .h 13 24' 16' Natiw.30'Or: EB Flout Tree CL Bursars etnaub Qznba Limbo 2 12' 6' Native .�o�Aa.ar— SP Sdiol Palm JAS Jaminum rah!. Wax JosMn. 15 12' 12' 24'x 13 5272 MO LIE Nepkroum yponlam Sword um 2 12' 6' Multi trunk HAW India)Hawthorn NEP NmhrokoN ezaltata Sword Fem 175 12' 12' New,16'Oa AL .QTMe� UR Udap InManekara coop.!. SSsoppodoM 1 12' 6' PIS Philodendron album Phldndron 2 30' 36' 42'Do IV Oyer..Mrghiana Live Oak Oak 1 16' 9' Worths SW Seletnla mahagonl Mahogany 3 12' 6' Native L- 1 TIP TIDsuehlna uMl.ana OtOry Bush 21 24' 15' 24'00 OF1 'I'l i !,I i• ; ,�E' _. � C c Y:CCCEtC•. :,iLti :tiY C 1.:r r 4a .�Y ,5�,A:.'1`.6C. ®o"oa ov. O 0 tO µ' IS B�t� :.1 N9 Y7E91,3i i— �_I9�3x .» �i ....-:raa. I O I _I _ _ r SZERDI & :��y : o -- -- • 0E— ASSOCIATES f \ / 1� I ARCHITECTS �. .,� I - j� ,F,` A. I. A. ,o W 1' `_■"'"` "°° SOUTH ELEVATION I INORTH ELEVATION '"`'a"`"" I `��,, non. ce4-eae-Date SCALE 1/4--1'-0- SCALE:1/4--1'-0• / ` t!az v34-eee-Itle Y i I © ,' D00.ISM QAIQ I /R eljEOI�U p is : p �C �h k • u a ' ' 111 g ,I .r :�ti';Eo:9i:�83.6i� ., '+�''�'1_El , I'N4.!'bi '.. ':�::::;; :__k_. I..1L_— :8 111111111'1111- -;111111111'11111111-111i1PAI11111111=-" amxe mio,�w a wpga♦.1 MiQ on •, M�Nloe I 9flI10J•31 O.fl D .,. •••• •.''' \, 10 S.E. 1st STREET EAST ELEVATION '° t i° SCALE:,n'-+'e' MI6 i 1114 rill�5. E _- EAd- i I _ - � DELRAY Btl E ptl1 qi ... CC p '; R � FLORIDAC �ptly9y9tltl Ip (ECgpp� I !!1.''':ij!„�:•;.:p!:s: �,� ''� 3y 7�i CiC4 1i , :11[i. .. .. :1: :•� ' +., 1,r 1 .4; e . .i : ..4 44415 iltl 5 S o. +51, ..c. _' '95' ' 't ,.��..N. :.•155 E ftl.,- -7.=,— =-._..-.- IN 1 --7±- 1191,_-,_ 'HI :irriimil -,-_-- 1E11 E I ♦ ♦ I e L--__—_..J WEST ELEVATON SCALE:1/4-A.r-o- :. 1 °0.2.1.1 "� " FLOOR PLAN ti� 1 i if a e�v SC..LE 1/4•-1,-0, Irli: neviana,toaa �av awawa 1 . ,,,Y'Y' '. ler 1 1----•y,-=^-- FLOOR PLAN ' woin� i H.C. RESTROOM ELEV. LOCATION MAP CC.•1 FS iJE-�1'-O' • . ..4ii o CITY w > N v; HALL w > I,.; > > w -a a 3a a a a a Z _J 111 _ N.W. 1ST ST. N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST ST. o .- L1-1 F. p 2 — NNI- M COMMUNITY • - CENTER z L,J 11. TENNIS OLD r STADIUM zl I< SCHOOL z L.,1117 411Z1 J SQUARE Z I I z ATLANTIC AVENUE T POLICE SOUTH I 11 1 — COMPLEX COUNTY COURT HOUSE w a .. _ w a > tilY / . _ `II II S.W. 1ST ST. S.W. 1ST ST. S.E. 1ST ST. Lj i:ici:K:K:K:M w . It v z = — it F S.Wr. 2ND ST. S.E. 2ND ST. i o t . vi 1/ '4; . w w w vivi vi vi vi N S.W. 3RD ST. S.E. 3RD ST. , S.E. 3RD ST. • 0 MERRITT II PARK Li vi 411, --gimiiiir` 10 S.E. 1ST STREET CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FL PLANNING do ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM344 ffi" ,,Y P '.1: :•! 7,'A' 4r.r-.';',,I.'!".4 ''"*P4. -.1" ..;-::.' ' ' tts,.... z i * =a R .!d 4' 'slsfst 1- "1 F � ,' ��;'� ,fix I z�„, ..'" • `-k q 'o S Yr .. ,V f}, "Wit. --, t ,, • R::" b , • r•:µ,.✓w [ Y . w4. '` A, t'E rJE. ;�Mf'� y hik1�,"' �F 'o�f 1M'RCY4„� a f*filf*,.r, )% �i �: a a� x� ir ,, " a .MES A LANTIC' . AVE- .. . e r" v, , `. %„.. h, _r HOUSE . , •.t :',-1„: ,.. y' 4,. tic � •'8' ; .. f LiI' #}` -,--,. ‘ ,, ', , '...,,-•, krol , ,,,-- , ",,,:itar-A6441-w—--. iir4,—:•;3.,,,fri':'. .0:;:;:;":;: *.' ---''''*•:. ‘;•,7**11r.i' D - as * «.a*gam .px $ - , s.s`p ' a.-• 1!•,, -! 7 f 5 if., •. 4 If ii" • ' .. rM . ...� '^ T •` m te 1� •>. f.,tm ,: §wf.s' ` r� y _ ',} tiles a i ,yt yg " r- n ,a' t e fit" i s +` s ,:, *- sa i--i4!,k4r..t-,,-*,...' .'.,-,*Vi,.a,„•.-,_Ozp—:-,i;,i6 . y . .$'+ :ym u' 2..,4,,.C 1-r t''„'.':.,.,•':-,...•:. i .. "7.y '' 4i w'W . * - 1s.-,2..1..t,.„'t 'f' ' k. i-,''-..'i , ,... -„,,.:-i, ,,•'-.4 2,;-4t1 i.',b,;"1,,-4•i _.44 f' 'iS :.'A n '4 4",F '"1f $d:. , .•t ."..4-,../1.,'Ir,4'7 -i - 2, r, , h ,.', ,'..2.-2..,,,,.-,-,", .'*1_o,,*,„1-.t.. ,.:. L' 1 : t ; ,iM ry tom. :7 CI 3:*AlVt ... . : F,'6.*r1 :' .��=4,-•••..4-,.',5,•'••',.•.-.:t;..-'1'. '„'..., � � Via. s' st1g --4,,.1,f,* k , .' ,..; ,. fir' , s, „, - .ate.° .:t•-eEa..itXk..n-,",::. .t f ' * ' ". - ''' '-'11,4* :''''.:i .r-:.",-"";* 1, 3.., 1, ;.7.4....' *.r.* ,., , :;; . ;.*. ,,...„:„, " ,.., ... .;„*.-- b„. 0......, ,,... .,-,,. .. ,,,.,,,, ,,,,,,,,:i i. _ ,4 ... .,,,-,--,,,k,k,,i •, ak :i.,,, : ,,A, . 10 S.E. 1ST STREET CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FL PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM344 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: May 12, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: III.C. ITEM: Consideration of COA 9-382 which incorporates a Class Ill Site Plan Modification and Landscape Plan for 250 Professional Building, Located on the Southwest Corner of Dixie Boulevard and N.E. 3rd Avenue. JI I 1 li • N.E.ii • i ' iii ) k i ' .yiH i 1 i i . i 1 i ' i ST. 1 i 1 N.W. 9TH ST. I 1 1 III I ` <'---G_ G gym-�__ ,,,,ILA Z I I I = I I I 11111 IR —�__- --w Z C. BUSHBOULEVARd— I-LJ > 11 1 11` 1— �~ ::, I I 1 I I I I I ST. VINCENT"S MARINA_.-: l IIII aP�,,,, III I INJE.I I CHURCH DELRAY- 7TH6T. �^N _vrDCE- P 1111 111 ��►�,01 o Flo I T 1 I `J- 11 I I I ' ,�,� � III)� I III I IIIIfiWOODI CONDO r N.E. 7TH ST. N.W. 6TH ST.Z i ,` n -� l--r— N.E. 67H 5T. ACURA 0 • 1. Z �PcG ` , , oP� ¢ DELRAY ` I F� BEACH O 1 • �I _ a Z I l rt ,,, N.E. 5TH TERR. N.E. �� 6TH ST. / ' I • I I I GENERAL DATA: Owner Dr. John Westine . Agent/Applicant Gerald B. Church Location Southwest corner of Dixie Boulevard and N.E. 3rd Avenue Property Size 1.15 Acres Future Land Use Map Transitional Current Zoning RO (Residential Office) Adjacent Zoning North: RO East: RO South: RO West: RO Existing Land Use Professional Office Building and vacant lot Proposed Land Use Construction of a 10-space paved parking lot with associated landscaping. _/Vater Service Existing on site. sewer Service Existing on site. III.C. ITEM BEFORE TkHE BOARD The action before the Board is that of approval of COA-9-382 which incorporates the following aspects of a Class III site plan modification for 250 Professional Building, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(1)(c): O Site Plan; and, CI Landscape Plan. The subject property is located at the southwest corner of Royal Court and NE 3`d Avenue. :R BACKG'ROUND The subject property consists of Lot 24, Block 10 of the Del-Ida Subdivision and contains 0.16 acres. The existing professional office consisting of Lots 1-5, Block 10 of the Del-Ida Subdivision contains 1.07 acres. The conditional use and site plan for the existing 10,952 square foot dental clinic were approved by the City Commission 1970. The subject property of the new parking area is currently vacant and undeveloped. The 250 Professional Building was constructed in 1972 according to Palm Beach County records. The subject property was rezoned as part of the Citywide rezoning and adoption of the Land Development Regulations in October 1990 from RM-10 (Multiple Family Residential) to RO (Residential Office). P;ROJEC,T D}ESCRI,P,TION., The development proposal consists of the following: o Construction of a 10-space parking on Lot 24, Block 10 of the Del-Ida Subdivision. o Installation of associated landscaping and lighting. The proposal includes the following waiver request: o A waiver to reduce the required perimeter landscape strip [LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d)] from 5' to 4' and 3.5' within the parking area. SIl'E PLAN: ANALYSIS; COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. Historic Preservation Board Staff Report 250 Professional Building -Class Ill Site Plan Modification &Landscape Plan Page 2 LDR Chapter 4.4.17 Residential Office (RO) District Regulations: Parking: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.17(G)(2), the parking required for the existing office • building is based on one parking space for each 300 square feet of total floor area, which equates to 37 total required parking spaces. The existing parking area of the office building contains 50 parking spaces, and 10 spaces are proposed for a total of 60 spaces. Consequently, the site exceeds the City's development regulations in terms of the required number of parking spaces. LDR 4.6 Supplemental District Regulations Lighting: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.3(B)(17), a photometric plan is required with the submittal of a site plan application. This photometric plan needs to demonstrate compliance with LDR Section 4.6.8, lighting standards. The proposed lighting scheme must provide an illumination of 0.5-foot candles in the new parking area. Furthermore, the light fixtures and poles need to be decorative and compatible with the adjacent residential uses in accordance with LDR Sections 4.4.17(H)(1) and 4.6.8(B)(3)(a). The proposed commercial "box" light fixture needs to be replaced with a decorative light fixture since they are not consistent with the adjacent residential uses. Finally, the light fixtures must have a cutoff feature to keep the lighting confined to the subject property. A condition of approval is that a photometric plan be submitted that provides decorative light fixtures will be installed and have cut-off features. Right-of-way Dedication: Per LDR Section 5.3.1, the required Royal Court right-of-way width adjacent to the property is 60'. However, only 50' of right-of-way currently exists in this location. In • accordance with LDR Section 5.3.1(D)(4), the City Engineer has granted the reduction of the Royal Court right-of-way to 50' based on a favorable recommendation by the DSMG (Development Services Management Group). The City Engineer and DSMG found that the existing right-of-way is sufficient to accommodate current and future public facilities. Other Items: Unity of Title: The proposed parking lot consists of Lot 24, Block 10 of the Del-Ida Subdivision. The existing professional office building consists of Lots 1-5, Block 10 of the Del-Ida Subdivision. As a stand alone parking lot is not permitted in the Ro zone district. Therefore, the parking lot must be tied together with the balance of the office development through a Unity-of-Title. A recorded Declaration Unity of Title must be provided prior to issuance of a building permit and has been listed as a condition of approval. Historic Preservation Board Staff Report 250 Professional Building-Class Ill Site Plan Modification & Landscape Plan Page 3 Pedestrian Access: As the parking lot is accessory to the office development, a pedestrian easement must be provided across the adjacent residential property to provide access. A condition of approval is attached that an executed cross access easement be provided between the parking lot and the adjacent office development • across the adjacent residential property. Technical Items: While the revised site plan has accommodated most of the staff concerns the following items remain outstanding, and will need to be addressed prior to building permit submittal: 1. That drainage calculations and exfiltration test results be submitted. LAN.DSCAPE ANALYSIS : This landscape analysis only relates to the proposed 10-space parking lot. The landscape strips on the south, east, and west sides of the property will be planted with Buttonwood trees and Green Buttonwood hedging. In addition to the proposed material, the plans indicate an existing Benjamin Ficus tree on the west property line will be retained as well as the existing Sanseviera Trifasiciata (Snake plant), which will be supplemented with Cocoplum hedging. The western perimeter landscape strip will also be planted with Spider Lily shrubs and Snake shrubs. However, as the Snake plant will not attain the required 4' height, the 4' Green Buttonwood hedge must be extended to the north property line. The landscape plan indicates that the Green Buttonwood hedging will be planted at height of 3' and allowed to grow to 4' high. However, according to LDR Section 4.4.17(H)(3), this required hedge must be 4'-high at the time of planting in order to provide a substantial buffer for the adjacent residential uses. The northern perimeter landscape strip will be planted with Mahogany trees and contains an existing Ficus hedge, which will be filled in with additional Ficus hedging material planted 6' high. In addition to the perimeter landscaping mentioned above, a 30'-35' high mango tree and a 35' Benjamin Fig ficus tree on the adjacent property to the north, and a 12'-14' Loquat tree on the adjacent property to the south will be counted toward the required trees as permitted by LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(f). The interior landscaping consists of two landscape islands. These landscape islands will be planted with Buttonwood trees and Spider Lilly as ground cover. Perimeter Landscape Strip: Per LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(a), a 5'-wide (interior dimension) landscape strip is required to buffer off-street parking areas and adjacent properties. The proposed site plan indicates that the southern landscape strip will have an interior width of 4' and 3.5' wide northern landscape strip. The applicant has submitted a waiver request to reduce the width of the required landscape strips. Historic Preservation Board Staff Report 250 Professional Building -Class III Site Plan Modification & Landscape Plan • Page 4 Waiver Analysis Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(6)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the approving body shall make a finding that the granting of the waiver: (a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; (b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; (c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; or, (d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would .be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. Since the proposed standard (9' by 18') parking spaces are not considered required parking spaces, they should be converted to compact parking spaces (8' by 16') and the remaining area converted to the perimeter landscape strips. This will increase the width of the perimeter landscape strips by 2'. The extra landscaping can be divided equally along each landscape strip, which requires a waiver from 5' to 4.5' on the north side of the property. A positive finding with respect to waiver of the required perimeter landscape strip width from 5' to 4.5' can be made as there will be sufficient landscape area to buffer the 10-space parking area from the adjacent residential uses. The proposed waiver is the minimum necessary landscape reduction to develop the property as a parking area for the existing professional office center. The waiver will not affect the delivery of public services, and will not create an unsafe situation with respect to public safety. Similar circumstances on other properties would lead to the same conclusion. Consequently, a positive finding with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), Waiver Findings can be made. Visibility at Intersection: Per LDR Section 4.6.14(A), a 20' visibility triangle is required at the intersection of the driveway and Royal Court. Within this area, no obstructions are allowed between 3'- high and 6'-high. The landscape plan notes that the 4'-high Green Buttonwood hedge will be located in this required visibility area. Within the visibility,triangle the Green Buttonwood hedge must be maintained at a height of not more than 3', which is attached as a condition of approval. Landscape Technical Items: The following Landscape Plan items remain outstanding, and will need to be addressed prior to building permit submission: 1. Per LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(a), the hedge located in the perimeter landscape strip adjacent to Royal Court shall be located toward the interior of this landscape strip. Historic Preservation Board Staff Report 250 Professional Building-Class Ill Site Plan Modification & Landscape Plan Page 5 • 2. Per LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(b), the unpaved portion of the Royal Court right-of- way adjacent to the subject property shall be landscaped with sod or a ground cover and irrigated. • 3. The required sidewalk must be noted on the landscape plan. REQUIRED FINDINGS Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(1)(c)(Class III Site Plan Modification), a modification to a site plan which represents either a change in intensity of use, or which affects the spatial relationship among improvements on the land, requires partial review of Performance Standards found in LDR Sections 3.1.1 and 3.3.3, as well as required findings of LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(5). LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(5) (Findings) Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(5), a finding that the proposed changes do not significantly affect the originally approved plan must be made concurrent with approval of a Class III modification. The proposed 10-space parking area will not significantly affect the originally approved plan for the 250 Professional Building. As noted under the Site Plan Analysis section of this report, the 250 Professional Building currently exceeds the number of parking spaces necessary in the RO zone district. Therefore, a positive finding with respect to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(5) can be made. The applicable Future Land Use Map and Concurrency items as they relate to this development proposal are discussed below. Section 3.1.1 (A) - Future Land Use Map: The subject property has a Future Land Use Map designation of TRN (Transitional) and is currently zoned RO (Residential Office) with the Del-Ida Park Historic District overlay. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.17(B)(3), Professional Offices are allowed as permitted uses within the RO zoning district and parking lots are allowed as accessory uses per LDR Section 4.4.17(C)(1). Since the RO zoning district is consistent with the TRN Future Land Use Map designation, it is appropriate to make a positive finding with respect to consistency with the Future Land Use Map designation. As off-site parking lots are not permitted principal use in the RO zone district, a unity-of-title is necessary to "attach" the parking lot to the balance of the 250 Professional Building property, which has been attached as a condition of approval. Section 3.1.1 (B) — Concurrency: The development proposal involves the construction of a 10-space parking lot with no additional floor/use area, therefore the proposal will not have an impact on water and sewer demands, parks and recreation facilities, traffic level-of-service standards, or Historic Preservation Board Staff Report 250 Professional Building-Class III Site Plan Modification & Landscape Plan Page 6 solid waste. Drainage will be accommodated on-site via an exfiltration trench system that is located within the parking lot, and has little or no impact on this level of service there are no problems anticipated complying with South Florida Water Management District standards. • Section 3.1.1 (C) - Consistency (Standards for Site Plan Actions): As recommended for approval, the proposed parking area will comply with the City's Land Development Regulations. Consequently, a positive finding of consistency can be made as it relates to Standards for Site Plan Actions. Section 3.1.1 (D) - Compliance with the Land Development Regulations: As described under the Site Plan Analysis of this report, a positive finding of compliance with the LDRs can be made, when all outstanding items attached as conditions of approval-are addressed. REVIEW BY OTHERS...., Community Redevelopment Agency: At its meeting of April 8, 1999, the CRA (Community Redevelopment Agency) recommended approval of the proposed site plan modification. Courtesy Notices: Special courtesy notices were provided to the following homeowners and civic associations: ❑ Seacrest H.O.A. ❑ Del-Ida H.O.A. Letters of support and objection, if any, will be presented at the SPRAB meeting. ASSESSMENT AEND CONCLUSION The development proposal to construct a 10-space parking lot will provide employee and overflow parking for the existing professional office building. This development will be consistent with LDR Section 3.1.1 and Section 2.4.5(G)(5) of the Land Development Regulations, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Compliance with the Land Development Regulations will be attained provided the conditions of approval are addressed. Furthermore, the proposed parking area complies with LDR Section 4.5.1 in terms of compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood if the conditions of approval are addressed. • Historic Preservation Board Staff Report 250 Professional Building -Class Ill Site Plan Modification & Landscape Plan Page 7 ;..,ALT,ERN„AT11/E ACT.:IONS , A. Continue with direction. B. Approve COA-9-382 for the Class III site plan modification and landscape plan for 250 Professional Building based on positive findings with respect to LDR Section 3.1.1 (Performance Standards) and LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(5) (Findings) of the Land Development Regulations and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to conditions. C. Deny COA-9-382 for the Class III site plan modification and landscape plan for 250 Professional Building with basis stated. STAFF RECOMMENDATION By Separate Motions: Waiver: Approve a waiver to reduce the required northern perimeter landscape strip [LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d)] from 5' to 4.5' within the parking area, based on positive finding with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5) provided that the 10 standard parking spaces by converted to compact parking spaces and the two-foot surplus transferred to the north and south perimeter landscape strips. Site Plan Modification: Approve COA-9-382 the Class III site plan modification for the 250 Professional Building based on positive findings with respect to Section 3.1.1 (Performance Standards) and Section 2.4.5(G)(5) (Findings) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to the following conditions: 1. That revised plans be submitted that address all Site Plan Technical Items of the Staff Report and submit three (3) copies of the revised plans. 2. That an executed unity-of-title be submitted for parking area to the 250 Professional Building development. 3. That an executed cross-access easement be provided between the parking area and the 250 Professional Building. 4. That the 10-parking spaces be converted to compact parking spaces and the two-foot surplus divided equally to the north and south perimeter landscape strips. Historic Preservation Board Staff Report 250 Professional Building -Class Ill Site Plan Modification & Landscape Plan Page 8 5. That a photometric plan be submitted that demonstrates compliance with LDR Section 4.6.8. 6. That decorative light fixtures and poles be installed and the fixtures shielded to eliminate illumination onto adjacent property. Landscape Plan: Approve COA-9-382 for the landscape plan for 250 Professional Building based on positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16, subject to the following conditions: 1. Address all Landscape Technical Items and submit three (3) copies of the revised plans. 2. That the Green Buttonwood hedge be planted at a minimum height of four feet. 3. That the Green Buttonwood hedge located in the 20' visibility triangle be maintained at a maximum height of 3'. 4. That the Snake plant be removed and replaced with a Green Buttonwood hedge. Attachments: • Site Plan • Landscape Plan . � I 1) \ 18.12 +18,14 WOOD FENCE AROUND x„(2,19 G END OF pg. >: DUMPSTER FENCE LOT 7 18.1 3.2'N. • BL UCK�10 17 : WATER LINE IN REAR OF PROPERT -OL EXACT LOCATION UNKNOWN + -�: ,83� ZRF •• • L +1:.0 t18.1 in SO O N. SO,OS' Np f�NGE 01. N .. • THICK UN BRUSH -WIRE FENCE I I CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT -6' x 6' OFF LOT 25, BLOCK 10 r • 4' CONCRETE WALK / O • 4` / 24' 18' I � 0 .5 I • • 'V. O On I )4 )4/ i ENCEN LINE " I L �p�< O T 24 p I ...Ao� • BLOCK 1 e �-z. Ns +17.8 Iv%+17.8 +17.b + 0 YO • 17.b .figr VACANT 0 4 G�� 0 0,5' EXISTINGf1 RESIDENCa D FLOOR 8.76 EXISTING RESIDENCE 0 POLE LIGHT FLOOR +19.55 •l 3' CONC. WALK ui I PROPOSED I �'- WIDE PARKING LOT FICUS HEDGE — _ I 10 SPACES llj ( 1 ._ • -- - 24 HI STOP BAR- 3'R ® 11 �� STOP. - N („J +17.9 I - • 5` .() a • _. . + +18.4 -..Pr 20`R X'. 0 N CONST 5' CONC. SDK. N �� --� +18.10 +18.30 E RLYAL C./� T, +18.52 +18.54 BENCH MARK BENCH HARK TOP OF NAIL TOP OF NAIL AND WASHER AND WASH +18.20 +18.5i D V E DESCRIPTION! - EXISTING SANSEVI TO REMAIN AS HE • SHALL -BE SUPPLE AS NECESSARY TO 1-CE 1/25LF EXISTING PARKING 1 PROVIDED 1,11AT ;ry LINE INR AI OF P OP-E��:T Y Y,ACT LOCATION UNKNOWN 1 EXISTING '0T . �,/,0 ,� 15L0CK f c L0T 3 2N.. �4 _- LOT 5 .SLOCf: 10 / p 5LOCK 70 `+ 50. 0 ' POL. �— POL _ _ a \ 5 ! C1pQ''��JQ0101.9 � � �ir- 4' CONC SI EWALK TING BRAZILIAN PEPPER o ar - - ' X 6' ACCES EASEMENT.-. - TO BE REMOVED Still / I 2-EXIS I. —15‘HL ' / BENJA �! 35 HT JAPONICA / LOQUAT o /2-CE 12-14'HT of 66-HL 3 - 30-FB6 i 1�aOor 7-D 6'H T A / -45 a*Y;,0. k (NO:CPACOM.0,4 OF P L \ x ® 10te--�.nS.O. . c �• o� 'oo00f.4 Tilt* __....., (, I 1 :4j••• O O� I r• 1 TYPE 'D' CURB O TYPICAL ` O - \ EXIST' LOT 2 O � � i I ` 30-35'H 5LOCK 10 4o, 9, 2-CE 6 Q . 66®-H L v,1,` XIS FLOOR .g;ss NCE1 15.5' itsgst;0:38c4 EXISTING FI O fOQ 1►16Q�/p 1/25LF 0 .' `'llO 4-SM 20' SIGHT � r 1/25LF 6 REQUIRED o TRIANGLE 6 REQUIRED: 80-CES Aj 0 0 4 PROVIDED 2' O.C. IA 2EXISTING 3'HT �� ` tic IN CLOSE MAINTAIN AT 4'HT�1� • O '• 5' oc o � j 4' :—" -iir 0 11-CI SOD 1-CE , �-, 7 .o '_ }t + '"•"•` ,at' " $ „4,.fit J._ _"'�E 141, r 8 to :-.),rer,-,NA:-..s,;;;;- ,:, -ri:: ....Atilt', *.tri,...:-.. ,:. ::.,.. 1.-„, .. ..„4.,-1,, )4,4 ,...A. ' ii, .,,..-,4, -.,. -, -gr:.)-,:-47' '-z.,71 i' • ..::.-, -,...,,,,,,,,,,, -., , ,,, .,-:,.., .. . ., --r- ,-i„:... -:.,:'t .'. jera•-•- . -,ituAlk, -i, ,‘,02,4---.7..a.v, -, ,> fr .7,-,„,,,,ti •'4. , .a's s -). ., -.0 '?'i 4�, s .. 3 ,�y, • " `off: .y sz,".•t°"'Mi Y j,` ,& '1 :tilk ,. ..,.- �: --.. .- a %`_ � ' fit, ...444447. 1„ _. , ;•.1 :1,, ,, .t ...•a' ' yr`„�.s F.'1 'se4 `i,L._,.r f -; l.n� E7,.+"y1p: .' '.,k 't; , , , , .4,..c K. at# -, M'um .'>y a <,,,ai a a:: �% '�� S '` '..* iiir `- .��". . vi, It t ' Iiiiiwitr :;:•11(1M E ; . i,16-1 'lit ,, — , 4%; '-._,,".Z.t.,.144.4., '':is;*- • • ilk • .. p41: P' "a �47fn . "#1`i.$ t , 'Y .. a. ,, 1,,,,,,,,. ,„ • iii a, , ...., ,,...„,.,,N.,,,,„,_ ,.:.,.„, ..u-,..0.:-.- . -, -•,:r. :-..,..;„... ,..,...: ,:„,,k 41.--„,-„:, 'i l'irr!!',,, vir it. ,,i'' ,‘,...%, ` �„ ♦mom a 7 . ,., .::‘..„,"',/ ' ,i `-"' t `sQcfs sf �'' K.x.EA¢ _ ,,3 4y`f ff ,aY{e 'may#'t] -1 s}'�'��, f. . Y yltk 7 .0 ".y+ e w , II 3 ��f y P i•'l 4 `114 i 4"rZ,..' d`tll. s 4 ' ' 1. A1 ' ` *, O' _- =2 '"' tZ }BEACH'ii 4;` M1r..t;o kL,;,"-7-*t,•i.t:#,-,.", a3R _ 1- {`, f . - _. -' - ',a •+l€„jr ku `, v , `} 'i „.i.i.i4.,4,°..A,:.ti.',t.,47„. a to i � . !- �w tr - k s '� Lry g ,e - '',-,•-.,.::, :* .i•:-A---•;("•:-",. .'4 „::i:14,-,."--,„' --.-::ii:: .,i,--'.:„„,..; ,,Alp, . ..;..;,.. ..;.:,„.... .„.., . ,,,,, ,.: .,., ,„,„„,,,.. , , ..: : „... ., .1. „„-r',:',,,'-.,,,'.'',,'.:.',,.',,,','ei„,••.,.,,,.•.',4,...t.:,•:,,,e4,;,,:,•:,'t,,,...,.,-c...:e'.4‘,.-.. :,-i;,---L.i-,,---4.'fr-.,..i,-.1.i.:.,N i.,0— ` -' 9 .. _ ,- - ' _ '4 ,..t. 'wit$, : ' •-- y a4, . . ''' '*' b : t. '': #4*W t •' "l '-. M'v. • , -i,w'-4':,0..F.,..i,,1-....,xi„:'e,i A„1::.—i1:-::-:,.l:"-...._-,.,i..,,--.:'Wt.„-:A"..;..:;,.J1*.,.:,47:..Li;;••f,;,.i.,.2.;,t..::",;-'...:,,7/-:.-.:,•,--.i;.T..4.:'A....-A.,• 1..).%'0-*•'1,.'., -.,AiP4r,„',_i 4--.„-...i„...:_4,..*: k . • ... +49 ♦� „,-AF, ..., / L ,i'i. ,..ti» Est - .,iri. i7 :. ,,�gypg. CASs k „gN g p : 4" g :* N _wiimiw-- WESTINE PROFESSIONAL BUILDING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FL PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM343 4 STAFF RE.P�O,,R T HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD Project Name: COA-9-382, Eric Carlstrom Project Location: 34 N. Swinton Avenue, Old School Square ITEM BEFOREy THE .B`OARD The action requested of the Board is that of approval for the renovation of a single-family residence which includes, windows, doors, porch repair, a new roof, and paint colors. BACKGROUND The house was built in 1922 in the vernacular style, with bungalow type porch piers. It is of frame construction on a concrete block pier foundation and has a pyramid type hip roof with a gable front and rear. The siding is horizontal wood clapboard. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposal is to replace 6 windows, install 2 new exterior doors, and a new roof. The enclosed porch will be restored to an open porch and the building will be painted. ANALYSIS OF THE PROJECT Windows The 6 replacement windows, (2 on the front (east), 2 on the north, and 2 on the south elevations, see attached floor plan) will be Anderson # NL2846, vinyl coated wood, single hung 1/1 sash. The new windows are not impact glass and will require hurricane shutters. The method of hurricane protection has not been specified. Doors The 2 exterior doors, 1 on the rear and 1 on the front, will be steel with raised panels, Stanley# E-17 with a clear glass fanlight. The windows and doors are appropriate for the vernacular style of the residence. Meeting May 12, 1999 Agenda Item: III-D 0 HPB Staff Report COA-9-382 Page 2 Porch The porch was inappropriately enclosed years ago. The applicant is proposing to remove the horizontal wood siding on the front and south of the porch. The original porch support is existing at the southeast corner and the applicant proposes to repair or replicate it. The porch supports on either side of the screen door will be reconstructed to match the original corner post. The screen door and all of the screen supports will be removed to recreate the original open porch. The applicant will bring a scaled drawing to the meeting. Restoring the original supports and open porch is appropriate and will greatly enhance the front elevation. Paint The paint colors do not fall within the approved color palette. The body of the house is to be yellow, the window inside trim is to be tangerine and the window outside trim and corner boards (which have been removed, but will be replaced) are to be orange. The shutters, fascia board and roof are to be green; however, the shutters are not included in the proposal. The door color has not been specified. Color samples will be available at the meeting. Roof The applicant is proposing to install a new roof, which will either be white asphalt shingle or standing seam metal, either would be appropriate for the structure. If he can obtain the cost estimates in time, he will present the selection at the meeting. The paint colors are lively and contemporary but their location on the building must be used carefully. For example, if the roof is green metal, it would be inappropriate to paint the fascia to match, and there are the exposed rafter tails to be considered in the color scheme. It is recommended that the yellow and tangerine be used with white trim and that only the doors be painted green as an accent. If a white asphalt roof is selected, the Board may wish to consider different color combinations and locations. However, staff recommends that the paint color selection be postponed if the roof selection is not made at this meeting. HPB Staff Report COA-9-382 - _ Page 3 ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS, 1. Continue with direction. 2. Deny with reasons stated. 3. Approve windows, doors and porch renovation as presented, and approve the roof material if presented, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E). If the roof material is presented and approved, the Board should give direction to the applicant with respect to the exterior paint colors. If the roof material is not presented, the paint color selection should be continued. RECOMMENDATION By Separate Motion A. Based on positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(E), approve the windows, doors and porch renovation as presented. B. Approve the roof, material based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E), with the building's color scheme to be determined by the Board. C. If the roof material is not presented, the paint color selection should be continued. File/u/ww/coa-9-3 82sr - _- - •-- . __ . . , --.-„ .. _ .. . .._.__.... ....- . . • 'inn - • •--'7,"..........,.-5-M"7"-•-••.'"'°•-•"'-•-•:•,,,,?•:lenrsttsta•-•.....r4..;:retr•••••• •,,...--s-c!. • t tt.,. -..a t•,,...•• • ;V..;:••AV:..Na•••••••tti 1.,..1.. . '. \,5,•,,----•=--;=-_i-----r------- •,. t,...--- ..-t,A;•t.sei. :.-.. i :47 -• ••-7_,••,. .... ------_-,..,------- --,-_-,„._ -4.40'.•••-e-. „... •-; „,- .:••• „:...-..,, .- 1 ‘,?.,..:::=" : ' •"'i** 24-•!'-••'-7--. :• * ---- ------ ---__-_-------=!------- -,' -:'''"'t• "- /' • • • ,,,---: :,. ,,,,,, .q _7"•••••.W* • . '''- ..___--------:-________ -,-7;-----,- ;:F4`;::`'/ I/' . •:.'!..4.•::._-::""-I"i''', ,:ta";.‘1;:.' ' 1 • ''-.7*‘••• ".• --'''`F•ir. -- j-...:'--.--------- ------- --"'":-_-'':---2-.-.-:- -"E.,__fl--"?-.........._..,..._-__-_'`.7-a_ii/ .-A:at't a ••‘..!''`. •• A , •. (.. .44.;,/:-..-_, -------;-.------- _ ''vi.,••• . ..-- -__•••.4;A;.,0.- %...• .... • . * . ..„-. to• ,A.,.._. . . ----- .• ':t:.,. " ".':.3 t N\\.'-i%' .a• Zit•: --.7-- - -' a _ - ,a1•••• ••., :k§?,1--•-•.....•-••••4--- -' . . f‘. *----A.r. • --"•,f..t..•:,. - - --• -'_...,-- -- - -.;••:: • ..•. 4.....,-, . • • . c /., ---•.__, --• - • -- - --r ",- ,' !-/ ,--_?•-_---"„.-_;-•;.---. -r--- - .. .a. ,... ' ' • '7 ...e'r".*• -r''.7-.. -:. '•-?•••'.:7_-• ---'-.1.-.---•7----i_I.---.,--_-_---..:.:::-;•;:4---• • 41., _- _..../.'_,* ''..,i'•-.±..- .../..--/-.=%:-.'"'-::--.::-._.•-__••.---..•-- •- --- • 4•-•••••• ,-=-,,,T77... t5*, • -._ ___ .- 7•••-•: :"."-_,,, .,.. i.,..,,,...;., _. . A.....,t •' . -*' , , .......--'qt. !-•.7-7,.-- •-•---- ` . ! i•-• --• AIN:. ..- • - ••^--""•-•":""*".••41/4404.-•':' ---.•-• 0. -•••;-...:._•"- •-• *:,•- • .... i a•••'-'-- -x ...•,. ' • •. _ `-'-`-••••••• •i•----,-`• -' ---7••••••i----'- •- '•: . ;••' !' ! " • •4•-•*'-----•• .,...___.. -•••::::::;:-‘-•-•-•----•-•-- ---- ' ";.....•...„.-...-1•••- •.--- • - i i :---- lih• •. ..:'- I.-•. .;..,-; t, • i'.,• I.. 1:74, - . • - 'Izt. - 1 --i:-- - •'•-• • • a . 1,1' _ ,.._______. •___ %•••• --' .• • ,.. • " .•-•‘----•• ;•- •----*--' • 1•4%i ; 44.-•:••. ..',....--;`,•-•* • r. ' .-- - ..11 .. s.• ! A . . -.....;-_;,:- '-:"'::R-'s"--- .... • ..-.. ... ...... ..._ . .7 -•:-.1 I - `. ,'-.,:....:-, ;-: ••'R, 17`.1 F, .. •-•-, --. - -- - - -- .... • • ' ' :2-1 : 17 '.-,,i Fri ,- _7_-_. ..- • - .,. - . _ -- _ -,_ - . - ,.-;=. ,..,,..: ij• • - - _.. .. .- _ . ... . -,_......2--...,-.A....- s. . - . _-- - . - - - -- -i".C.r••••••-• - _ ..... .. . , . ...,..2: 74.,,s7.:!,,,.4...,-.X a • ..%.. . -- . . ..„ • - , . . .._ • .2!.._r. gr•--..-10-. ...,. .. - -tr .. ' .... -5 ' ..•_ 4iir r _ •3I.,...'•-• ski). V \A '..f --' . . ... thtt-te I . r-.Z...• s _ . -‘• . fc - "---/Poior • • . _________ ,.._ _____ ____ .., _ . - -• •- 111 --____---_._ - ._ . --'*'•_>_..,. ,_____---- --------.--- -'-.1-- - . ai"...- , .::--_-.----•-------1---.--.. .•••••..„ / • % % \% t • ,.....— • it .., ---. __ _ _- •. ,,, i m- . - • -- --- -- • i,••''''• ':-."›,11- ;••-••,-0- \ :-. ' • -;•-•.:-• - .— . __ _ .•. . ...... 7."-.:• . . ...1.*1„ ,',• . .4, ,,0%,.,,/er,... . . ..,••.../ r•L . 4"•••:// ...• •Vi•.----:::•••-..=---- . _. ........,;!t•r- /•'....-..A.AN i•- '-"'. 3.-r•••••••!•.:::;..:••-,•;.4.: : •:1•.• 'ZIP.: 1.17:,--.: ---:,:: 4rie.... • •.. -,1-;.-..... ^ ,--,! . -... .. • ---,r,-----,, ...J..3-•-•,-,-- .,:::: 4.„.... ..,.. ....-„, ,......„,- cif. .-1..,.,-,., ... • - . ,- — -_ :• „.„. • .7.2.. _....:„.„ :. . :,...„....„ •.. . . _ •....:.:. _ •• ••7•....-....","-:-.'••k ..• ag tii -,i , -. .:1-1cetZif - - •-o- ,:. .-....- (1 ll •- •-i•• ....204i.ii-i •T__.......„... • .....% 1.•,.,. / ‘.• P...-..z.... ...‘- _-__•\ ;•-• --,.:.•••. ,-..7.- ;•-:-V.:-.7,q:' irlt.. .. a. . . ,:,...- .r, Fi. - ,.. ....-:-",. , -7.•N, i ,. _„, ,, ...._ .... ..iic„..„ . ,... ..„,... ...- -- 4. ;4•4 .14 ;•,, , ••1‘. ,, ..'l '' '2 ' ' -'---r* • :.•••:•4 • •` P• •••..:••••.t.. •••:';',91 I; 441(•1 ..--).•WA.': . 1;...xf ,,.,- =-, - ...-___ .:7-.-..li - •I :! I,4,._- A -!i4S.7---"I ," -____.- - - - . .*.r•-..._-..k...:;'- - • ..,_ . _/.±1 A LC Itk.:\ ,;••••' •••7i•..%s '44,;••••••.• •••"..4 - ••- ••:-..1.....'-,.... .lk I ' l''.1:::\V!. •'''''''... .'-'''.• --if- -- '...*-- r t...... / f4... r - ..t...... . X,•.4'14. • : .1 64;let-:.........,.,..:!... 1...... . - • ' ....•*.a,• •:;:,.4-4, ,0.r1:74"..:',. .,1-:.:..:-. ..." '... .... '":::..".,'Ais.....N.- -. •• ,. e. 7._,..,,_ At.,>,.. ..„........,_• ...._. .:. .... `aa-t.:- „,-11.1tiL.1. ,-- _._ •-••/.•••:-.,...- • L:-risiv.:••s.-7:-:•---,.. ....-• -.4''-'.. --, '. •k•I'''.--........- t..- ta---,._•--_,._....--;-•-4---,...---- 70-- 11.1.•;::a. • .".,:4%;.7•2•• 4 - ,, . _ ....its-•••••. ..--,....-•-•,. :"4.,:.,-- i. is.f..._-„_-z---:"?'-;.•:WI"- -•:'" Z.-4.-._.L.•A' •-..-....'S:0 ...„.. . 4-,-.. - -...-- • " 1. ' ::-:- - --",:••- ----.•-• `a.' • 1 -;.. • 4.-f-K4s•••-?2: "f---7_. ...-----,,:-'•,b sr r t 7.;•')••••-",* tv er .1- -----= --. -. ...-- - .:•-.., .-- 3. -, ,-.,. -'.-:•:- .,..;:-----=,..01- - --7:::74.- 'i ,....- -.t .,.4 ..;:•11.. * /41....e.A.T .!....---- - 741-_ .1.1 --t--.77:14 47.,•'t '.- iy: icrrp,;Ig eftc....,•--;;;--;-,,,,„_ , a ___•,--_,,:..._r.,. ..,: iP•-' -. .: 77`..-r-7- ,•-:.•,,..,,._..k___ - 3,t, ,,:•,,,,.......„....._:„.„., ....___ . .„......—:.....--ar . • , . [ ••. . • .'' :i ,.:.• -•,;.-.77-..:•--- -.-- -;-*--".;1•' 4._:'---: „2....-..:-.-L4-6:1.7-. •:-.._____.-"----L tr- ... •••:_.. ••• „..f,4-4-,Gw/•?..*:43'..,:-. -.• .-..,; -•• . ......!.. ;•%_••-.b- : "' • ; -....-••• --...4.14:..•%:.% •••••-:.--,. '•.'..-.:"...,:,,. a...-• - '- .— — g ff. eioto./vc--A _ . •I.• •I .-'5..)V . . - ..• . . . . .I ,,1•• ' . .I .1 • . oft r I • .. r'' '.•/ .. 1 1 1 N'''''' . ... r • .. ...... . . ...... 'I. 1 b... / ). . ) . I ' • 11 L. 1 I--- I r r 1 ),,.... , I...J.-T. , . . . . . . . . ..._.... . • . • . . . .• • ••• . ••...•• • ...,. .... • . •.••• ... • I • • .. ,.....n.....:1',..,.....,...-n-d,,,---..—.4-.............;....-.-......- . I '•.,.... ,---,--..,-.r-••••••••••••--...-trnr,Tr.r.r;:;i:ii.,77.7.:r...-.........,.• 1...,•.`''''.-.-"...-----'''''''''.-"---.'"---"-- i r'''''- -11* Ilw...-..._. '.7-7• 7--,.....-...- --....,.( ......r------' .- ..- ,,- - I':--..•''''' --" I 1 i 1 . ;-,..___- ,,, .........••••••••••• ,............. ....,,,..,.. 4,. ...........• --- ... ..--_. 1 i ...............-...... • I t, .."1 )....----..- . . •....-----t ---,-,..---.... • . . -.---..-.----. ., , ' i --- I.- j 1 ; . I i (1-•1: :,,4 ' .. ........... . 1 t ..---............-. I , , ' I . $,........"—Ii -,.--. i. ..,,It' .-•,,' t I . . , 1 i •• 1 ----•• .( i 1 —. ..' ' -- , ---.:=A-zn,e,---- •• ,,,,,, ! 1 t •.:111rj I ! .), ........ ----. , — ''''t , , 1'>-- --..:._-• __________,_ ‘.---_. .., 1 - • . ti'Pi 1 • i „,.,,,‘":, .;.' __________—___ ___--____ • —_-- 1 '1 i NI) 1) ,,,.......•,-;_.' ... .. . .... r.c../' ‘..,: • ,.,-r_.._._.__.....___—__--________________ . _,----_--. , I . . . •• c .,,,... .., i1. ......_....- • . .... .. . 1 . r / /7 itt.,//. .,: ., . ,r--- 1 1 / ! 1, 1 / . . , r I / : • I I' / / ..... . . i . ! i• / ), ' • . .• • ' / I i ,. i I I r , I I / I . ' ,• • , . • . ,/ / .. .• • / / 1 I .• 1 . ' / / I . ., • ' • • ' . / / 1 1 ,' , I f 1 . . II .... 1 / 1 . . • / .1 1.......,......:-,...t . ; " . , . .. LI. ,.. ,t-4- ! ,/ . . .. . .. .. ...•.,......v.nkl-s,....... • ; r f....-......;_ , ,.11 . ----........___.—.........- , ( ' i „ 1 .........7_, • - ,.. . . ., , ,. . , .. / .. ./ , . . . . .147 , ' • • ., . ; 4. •--___. • • •. . , .—..........—..—...,...„. . 1--.---- .1. . . ,...2. —,....—.-1—... ---- -— . .. _____ ..,...„..................a.......::.......... ........................bo..w..m. , ................-............... .. . ... ' ' '' . - ./ / •i . . . '''''...N.\.„......s'''''.....,,,.......,.......'s'... ',....„.c.://' ,.... 1.......................:....... . ................... ......... .... ........... . r • •. • • -----.,._. —........______) ., 1,;J• , . . , •i • • !.....1 • . . . . • . . CARLSTROWSWINTON HOUSE 34 N. SWINTON -- FRONT OF HOUSE WINDOW I WINDOW : /�, (�)t , ot') -7 D� 7 l BEDROOM 1 KN PORCH . / .'' :•.': • / _ i :FRONT DOOR• : WINDOW I WINDOW . 7 ..._ , .., . • . 7---2-----t--. n BEDROOM 2 \ . LIVING\ROOM L y/ ° z KITCHEN DINNING c) .3. ROOM 3 . 10 i BATH - DEN / BEDROOM 3 MOONIM !BACKDOOR', ! MOONIM ! MOONIM BACK OF HOUSE a N.W.4101 Li Li 3RD ST. N.E. 3RD ST. _ Li > u < > - CITY I ATTORNEY BUILDING O x x p I r- I- C I I to Z III I MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DRIVE N.E. 2ND ST. - p In W _ Z - Cs7z D I Z .. . _ W . I:r■ _ — > z c CITY Q I HALL cs Lei IL". — N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST ST. N.W. 1ST ST. - LL1 z � Li z �U1// 1i. -3.... COMMUNITY IIII _z z z CENTER IINIM 1.11 TENNISIIII OLD It I I STADIUMSCH I OL J SQUARE I 1 ATLANTIC— l AVENUE - �l1111 POLICE SOUTH i 11 1Z COMPLEX COUNTY w w > a COURT < < O ¢ N HOUSE I— Z I- rx- p (f) i- p 0 N N x rn S.W. 1ST T. S.W. 1ST S.W. S.E. 1ST ST. _ ¢ z N IY W 0 Ul M .11 W (!) In Vi In W N N Mil • N --simi-' 34 N. SWINTON AVENUE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FL PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM226 S AFF REPORT HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD Project Name: COA-9-381-Continuation, Sally Gebo. Project Location: 242 N. Swinton Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE "BOARD The action requested of the Board is that of approval to replace 4 original double hung wood windows with aluminum windows with dimensional frames and muntins. BACKGROUND . " .. .,..... The original proposal was to replace the 4 windows (2 on the front and 2 on the southeast corner of the south wall) with single hung aluminum sash with snap in muntins. The project was reviewed on April 21, 1999 and based on positive findings to Section 4.5.1(E), the Design Guidelines and The Secretary of the Interior's Illustrated Guidelines, the Board voted to continue the item with the following direction: • That the owner obtain estimates for repairing the original windows or consider wood replacement windows. The Board also suggested that if aluminum windows are considered they should have dimensional frames and muntins. The applicant was asked to return for review of the replacement windows. STAFF COM MENDS _ . .a., The applicant's contractor will present the Board with specifications which he feels will conform to the Board's comments and direction with respect to the use of aluminum windows. ALTERNATIVE 'ACTION 1. Approve as presented. 2. Deny, with reasons stated. RECOMMENDATION Board's discretion. Meeting Date: May 12, 1999 Agenda Item: III-E 1 1 1 BLJSRL DR. \ \/\ I i . i ! IV i ! 1 �4D J BOY SCOUT ! TRINITY N.:-. 5TH ST. HUT LUTHFR.4N ! ; ( i l l ' I . I ! I III ) ( _ 1 11 . i ' W I ! J L .A K 7 IDA A ROAD A D T. I 11 N.E.N � aTH j, 11 I I L_�:I I I I pnc` I! I I ��I I �!I CASON I 1 OF-IC- -� I I 1 I II I :II METHODIST ! 11 C 'URC ' 1 -- � I 11 I I i I j 11 I I> ; ui I --<1 <I ui II I I < II <I i - I ! I I---11 I II-1 I I I --II I Si. N.E. 3RD 1-- ST. ! N.W. 3..D I I MEI 1 ...`� > I t� < I - I I WI I f l - 1 I I - I i j z 1 I I IJ I CITY 1 1 i o ..I 1- '_ W UI N r'� 1 1 ATTORNEY i 1 BUILDING II1> I j Ei I jo ,- , 1 I Y) I I I I < 1 1 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DRIVE (N.W. 2ND ST.) N.E. 2ND ST. I II I� 1 f I s=1 I-1 1 II i" - In I ui 41 II I I EI HALL z w • - I I I • / - N.W. 1ST ST. I N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST ST. I LII �1 z I o - 1 i 3 COMMUNITY I- w w L -z z z CENTER z ' I I I -=NNIS U) OLD I I I I I I 1 1 I STADIUM I SCr',OOL 11111 j j I l I l I I I I 1 j SOUARL , I I - I IIIIIII ! I i ATLANTIC A V N U E I ( EIIVII I III ! 1 1 I i I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 / 177 N --viimmr_ 242 N. SWINTON AVENUE CITY OP DELRAY BEACH, c_ PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM328