Loading...
HPB-10-07-1998 DELRAY BEACH bgerg All-AmedcaCityr 111111, AGENDA 1993 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: October 7, 1998 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286.0105. I. CALL TO ORDER (Roll Call) II. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. COA-351, Vacant Lots, Block 59 Lots 1 & 9, New Construction, Old School Square Historic District. Lloyd Hasner, Castle Florida Building Corp. , Owner. Approval for Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Design Elements for Two Mixed Use (Residential and Office) Buildings. B. COA-360, 116 S. Swinton Avenue, Contributing Single Family Residence, Old school Square Historic District. Rodney Romano, Authorized Agent. Approval for Demolition or Relocation of a Contributing Single Family Residence. C. COA-358, 251 Dixie Boulevard, Noncontributing Commercial Building, Del-Ida Park Historic District. Henry Dean, Owner. Approval for Renovations to a Commercial Building. I HPB Meeting October 7, 1998 Page 2 D. COA-339-Continuation, 1104 Nassau Street, Contributing Single Family Residence, Nassau Park Historic District. Liz Bold, Owner. Approval for a Porch/Deck on the North and East Elevations. III. DISCUSSION AND ACTIONS ITEMS Recommend to the City Commission that a Waiver to LDR Section 4.1.4 ( C) be Granted for Lot 10, Block 1 (N.E. 7th Street) in the Del-Ida Park Historic District. The Waiver is Requested to Allow a Nonconforming Lot of Record Which is Under the Same Ownership to be Sold as a Separate and Buildable Lot. IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Reports from Historic District Representatives B. Board Members C. Staff V. ADJOURN 12/-4f-je Pat Cayce Historic Preservation Planner POSTED ON: October 2, 1998 File/u/ww/agenda/hpb 10798 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: October 7, 1998 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairperson at 6:00 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Turner, John Johnson, Susan Hurlburt, Tony Keller, William Griffin MEMBERS ABSENT: Shane Ames, Betty Diggans STAFF PRESENT: Pat Cayce, II. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: A. COA-351: Vacant Lots, Block 59 Lots 1 & 9, New Construction, Old School Square Historic District. Lloyd Hasner, Castle Florida Building Corp., Owner. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of approval of COA-351 which incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for Lloyd Hasner Office Building, pursuant to LDR section 2.4.5(F): ❑ Site Plan ❑ Landscape Plan; and O Design Elements The Subject properties (Lot 1 and 9, Block 59) are located on the south side of Martin Luther King Jr. Drive (NW 2' Street), between Swinton Avenue and NW 15` Avenue, within the OSSHAD zone district. It was moved by Ms. Hurlburt, seconded by Mr. Keller and passed 5-0 to approve the waiver request to LDR section 4.6.16 (H)(3)(a), to reduce the required 5' wide landscape strips between the off-street parking area and the north/south alley to 3 '/2' and 4 '/Z', based upon a positive finding with LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5). And to approve a waiver to LDR Section 5.3.1 (D)(2), to reduce the required right-of-way width for NW 1s1 Avenue from 60' to 40', thus waiving the requirement for the property to dedicate additional right-of-way. It was moved by Mr. Johnson, seconded by Ms. Hurlburt and passed 5-0 to approve COA-351 for the site plan for Lloyd Hasner Office Building based upon positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards) of the Land Development Regulation, policies of the Comprehensive Plan and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) subject to the following conditions: 1.That a limited access easement be provided along the north side of lot 1 prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. That a sidewalk easement agreement be executed prior to issuance of building permits. 3. That the location of site lighting be indicated on the site plan and landscape plan including fixture details and provision of a photometric plan. 4. Provide a note on the plan that the utilities will be underground. 5. Provide details of the proposed bicycle rack. It was moved by Mr. Keller, seconded by Ms. Hurlburt and passed 5-0 to approve COA-351 for the landscape plan for Lloyd Hasner Office Building based upon positive findings with respect to Section 4.6.16., subject to the following condition: 1. That the Alexander Palms are to have double or triple trunks. It was moved by Ms. Hurlburt, seconded by Mr. Keller and passed 5-0 to approve the Design elements associated with COA-351 based upon positive finding to LDR Section 4.5.1(E) Development Standards with the following condition: 1.That appropriately sized (1/2 the width and full height windows) wood louvered shutters, wall mounted with spacers to make them appear operable, be used where shutters are indicated on the elevations. The use of shutters on the front elevation is left to the owners' discretion. B. COA-360: 116 S. Swinton Avenue, Contributing Single Family Residence, Old School Square Historic District. Rodney Romano, Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board : The action requested of the Board is that of approval for he relocation or demolition of a contributing single family residence; and, the demolition of the non-contributing garage. No formal action was required by the Board with respect to the proposal for the vacated lot. The proposal including site plan, landscape plans, and design -2- 10/07/98 elements must be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Department before consideration by the HPB. It was moved by Mr. Johnson, seconded by Mr. Keller and passed 4-0 (Ms. Turner stepped down) to approve the relocation or demolition of the contributing residence and associated garage within a 6-month period, based on positive finding to Section 4.5.1(E). Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1)(e) Restrictions on Demolition, the Board has requested that the applicant provide a site plan for the proposed use of the lot if the house were demolished or relocated. The site plan presented indicates that a temporary parking lot would be constructed on the lot. However, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H)(d), the site is not located within a geographical area that permits temporary lots. Thus, if approved the parking lot would be permanent. The Board was reluctant to allow the house to be relocated or demolished based upon the site's use as a permanent parking lot. As temporary parking lot permits are renewed yearly for a maximum of 3 years, the Board added the following condition of approval: • That the proposed parking lot be permitted for a maximum life of three years. When the parking lot site plan comes for formal review, the Board may stipulate that the approval is only for a 3-yeatr period. At the end of the 3-year period the Board may require the site plan and use to be revised. (Staff will recommend to the Board that within 2 years of the approval for the parking lot, the applicant must obtain site plan approval for the other alternatives). C. COA-358: 251 Dixie Blvd., Noncontributing Commercial Building, Del-Ida Park Historic District. Henry Dean, Owner. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of approval for the renovation of a non-contributing professional office building. It was moved by Mr. Keller, seconded by Ms. Hurlburt and passed 5-0 to approve COA-358 as presented with the following conditions: 1. All fixed and single hung windows are to be factory finished white aluminum and may have lightly tinted glass, 2. The rock wall to be constructed in front of the handicapped ramp will be the same height and not follow the downward slope of the railing. Foundation planting is to be installed at the base of the wall; and 3. At the applicant's discretion he may: -Terrace the rock wall in front of the access ramp by adding a second lower wall to act as a planter, and -3- 10/07/98 • -Install wood louvered Bahama shutters on all of the front windows. D. COA-339-Continuation: 1104 Nassau Street, Contributing Single Family residence, Nassau Park Historic District. Liz Bold, Owner. Item Before the Board: The action requested by the Board is that of approval of COA-339 to allow a porch/deck to be constructed on a portion of the front façade, and along the eastern portion of a new room addition. It was moved by Mr. Keller, seconded by Mr. Griffin and passed 5-0 to approve the deck/porch as presented based on positive findings to Section 4.5.1(E) and the Design Guidelines, with the following condition: That low foundation planting be installed as the base of the lattice infill. *****Items added onto the Agenda***** E. Afictionado Bookstore, associated with the Sundy Inn, 6 SE 15t Street, OSSHD Pre-Application Review (No formal action was required): The action requested of the Board is to give comment and direction on a proposal to convert a contributing single family residence to a bookstore. The property is located on the southeast corner of SE 1st Street and S. Swinton , across the street from the Sundy Inn. The comments and direction given by the Board were that the proposals addition to the north elevation (SE 1st Street) completely alters and obscures the front of the house; the west (Swinton) elevation leaves only a small portion of the original house visible. The Board suggested that the project be redesigned so that more of the original structure remains visible. F. Gorndt Residence, NE 7th Street and NE 2"d Avenue, Del-Ida Historic District, Gary Eliopolous Architect, Agent. Pre-Application Review (No formal action was required): the action requested of the Board was to give comment and direction on a proposal to add a garage and renovate the contributing single family residence. The proposal will require a variance to the side set-back requirement. The comments and direction given by the Board were to encourage the agent to apply for a formal COA review. Additionally the Board was supportive of the variance which will allow a non-conforming porch to be enlarged. -4- 10/07/98 • III. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS A. Lot 10, Block 1 (NE 7th Street) in the Del-Ida Park Historic District. The action requested of the Board: To recommend to the City Commission that a waiver be granted to the LDR Section 4.1.4 (C) with respect to adjoining lots of record under the same ownership. It was moved by Mr. Johnson, seconded by Ms. Hurlburt and passed 5-0 to recommend to the City Commission that a waiver be granted to LDR Section 4.1.4 (C), based upon the Boards' positive direction and comments made at the pre-application review on September 16, 1998. IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS: A. Reports from Historic District Representatives None B. Board Members None C. Staff None V. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business before the Board, Ms. Hurlburt moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:15 P.M., seconded by Mr. Keller and passed 5-0. The undersigned is the Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for October 7, 1998, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on 0,1 , 1998. If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. -5- 10/07/98 , , .,..____. VIISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD TY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: October 7, 1998 AGENDA ITEM: III.A. ITEM: Certificate Of Appropriateness (COA-351), for New Construction of a Mixed Use Structure Known as Lloyd Hasner Delray Office, Located on the South Side of Martin Luther King Jr. Drive (N.W. 2nd Street), Between Swinton Avenue and N.W. 1st Avenue (Block 59, Lots 1 & 9). 1..),,c, i TRINITY N.E. 5TH ST. " LU THERAN LAKEE IDA ROAD Ill N.E. 4TH ST. — POST CASON OFFICE — METHODIST — CHURCH GENERAL DATA: - Owner/Applicant Castle Florida Building Corp., — Lloyd Hasner, Owner - gent Cotleur& Hearing, Inc., — N.W. 3RD ST. N.E. 3RD ST� Donaldson Hearing Location South side of Martin Luther King Jr. — Drive, between Swinton Avenue and z N.W. 1st Avenue. CITY Lil — Property Size 0.46 Acre — ATTORNEY > - BUILDING ¢ Il Future Land Use Map Other Mixed Use I y MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DR. N.E. 2ND ST_ Current Zoning OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic — Arts District) Adjacent Zoning....North: OSSHAD -_ East: OSSHAD 7 South: OSSHAD Z CITY — HALL — West: CF (Community Facilities) — Existing Land Use Vacant Lots N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST ST Proposed Land Use Request for COA-351 for the new z Z — construction of 2 mixed use structures COMMUNITY Z 0 (2,600 sq. ft. office on the 1st floor&2 CENTER — one-bedroom apartments on the 2nd floor), with associated parking and TENNIS OLD landscaping. STADIUM �' SQUARE Water Service n/a A T L A N T I C A V E NU E Sewer Service n/a I SOUTH > > COUNTY < COURT a HOUSE n - ,7; — N , III S.W. 1ST ST. S.E. 1ST ST. I IInnn r III.A. r ITEM BEFORE- .THE ' BOARD The action before the Board is that of approval of COA-351 which incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for Lloyd Hasner Office Building, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F): ❑ Site Plan; ❑ Landscape Plan; and ❑ Design Elements The subject properties (Lot 1 and 9, Block 59) are located on the south side of Martin Luther King Jr. Drive (NW 2nd Street), between Swinton Avenue and NW 1st Avenue, within the OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) zone district. BACKGROUND- The vacant properties involve Lots 1 and 9, Block 59, Town of Linton Plat, each containing .23 acres. An existing paved north/south alley separates the lots. With the Citywide rezoning and adoption of the Land Development Regulations in October 1990, the properties were rezoned from RO (Residential Office) to OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District). At its meeting of December 3, 1997, the Historic Preservation Board approved a duplex project on Lot 1 (SE corner of Martin Luther King Jr. Drive and NW 1st Avenue) known as the Westrock Courtyard Homes. That project was never built, and a new developer has purchased Lot 1 and the adjacent Lot 9 to construct two mixed use buildings, one on each lot. On September 15, 1998, the City Commission approved with conditions, two conditional use requests to allow two residential units (versus one as allowed as a permitted use) within the mixed use structures on the second floors; and to allow the residential use to be other than that provided in Section 4.4.24(C)(2), that the residence is occupied by someone connected to the business or owner of the parcel. A condition of approval was that of obtaining site plan approval. The site plan is now before the Board for action. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project involves the relocation of the offices for Castle Florida, Inc. (contractor's office) from 11 SE 6th Avenue to Lot 9 that fronts on Swinton Avenue. The development proposal involves the construction of a mixed-use development on each lot (mirror image) consisting of the following: • 2,670 sq.ft. office space on the first floor to be subdivided into two leasable spaces; o A 1,622 sq. ft. and 986 sq.ft. One-bedroom units on the second floor (total 2,670 sq.ft.); • HPB Staff Report Lloyd Hasner Office Building—COA 351 (Site Plan Approval) Page 2 o Installation of 9 parking spaces that will be located to the rear of each building which take access from a north/south alley that separates the lots; and o Installation of a refuse area, bicycle racks and associated landscaping. The proposal involves a waiver request regarding the reduction of perimeter landscape strips [LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(a)]. SITE PLAN ANALYSIS COMPLIANCE WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS The body taking final action on the site and development application/request shall specifically address items identified in the Land Development Regulations. LDR Section 4.3.4 (Base District Regulations): Building Setbacks The proposal meets the required 25' front, 7.5' side interior, 15' side street, and 10' rear setback requirements of the OSSHAD zoning district. With regard to the building setback for Lot 1, see the discussion below. Frontage: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(E)(2) frontage is the shortest property line adjacent to a public street, except for property lines, which abut an arterial or collector street, in which case the lot along said street should be deemed to be the frontage. Based upon this requirement, the frontage for Lot 1 would be Martin Luther King Drive as it is a City collector having a higher road classification than NW 1st Avenue. The site design for Lot 1 orientates the front of the development to NW 1st Avenue with a 25' front setback and a 15' side street setback from NW 2nd Street. Thus, to maintain this design a limited access easement running along the north property line must be provided and has been attached as a condition of approval. With respect to Lot 9 both abutting streets (Martin Luther King Drive and Swinton Avenue) are City collectors. Since the shortest property line is adjacent to Swinton Avenue it is considered the frontage and the project is designed as such. Building Height Within the OSSHAD zoning district a maximum building height of 35' is permitted and the proposed structures will have a height of 27' to the midpoint of the roofline. . r HPB Staff Report Lloyd Hasner Office Building—COA 351 (Site Plan Approval) Page 3 Open Space Pursuant to Section 4.3.4(K), 25% of non-vehicular open space is required. The development proposal provides for 43.9% open space, which exceeds the requirement. LDR Chapter 4.6 Supplementary District Regulations: Parking Requirements Pursuant to Section 4.4.24(G)(1), within the OSSHAD, business and professional offices shall provide 1 parking space for 400 sq.ft. of floor area and pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(C)(2)(d) when there is residential use in a building whose primary use is commercial, one bedroom dwelling units shall provide 1 space per unit. The proposed building contains 2,670 sq.ft. of office and 2 residential units requiring 9 parking spaces. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(6), when parking requirements are applied to new development or a change in use, said parking requirements should be reduced by one parking space. This reduction may only occur once. Based upon this code section, 8 parking spaces are required and 9 have been provided. Bike Rack: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(C)(1)(c)(3), bicycle parking facilities shall be provided by a fixed or stationary bike rack for any non-residential use within the City's TCEA. The subject property is located within the TCEA area, and a bike rack has been provided for each lot. Site Lighting Pursuant to LDR 4.6.8 (Lighting), site lighting must be provided for the parking lots. Site lighting locations have not been indicated on the plans nor have details and illumination information been provided. The lights are limited to a maximum height of 25'. Site lighting and illumination details must be provided, and comply with standards outlined in LDR Section 4.6.8. which is attached as a condition of approval. Right-of-Way Dedication: Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.1(D)(2), the required right-of-way width for NW 1st Avenue is 60' and 40' is dedicated. However, pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.1(D)(4) (Reduction in Width), reduction in the required right-of-way width may be granted by the body having approval authority of the associated development application (HPB) provided the reduction is supported by the City Engineer after a recommendation from DSMG (Department Services Management Group). DSMG and the City Engineer have determined that the existing 40' of right-of-way is adequate for NE 1st Avenue. Further, the City has no plans to modify/widen this street section, which would necessitate acquisition of additional right-of-way. Based upon the above, a waiver to this requirement is recommended. • HPB Staff Report Lloyd Hasner Office Building—COA 351 (Site Plan Approval) Page 4 Sidewalk: Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.3(B)(1), a 5' wide sidewalk is required within the rights-of- way adjacent to the properties. A sidewalk exists along Martin Luther King Drive and Swinton Avenue, however no sidewalk exists along NW 1st Avenue and one must be provided. With the review of the reduction in right-of-way, the City Engineer and DSMG determined that the public sidewalk should be installed on the subject property given the width of the existing right-of-way (40'). They requested an easement rather than a dedication of right-of-way as the dedication would have effected the drainage within NW 1st Avenue. The site plan indicates the sidewalk on the property. The applicant must provide a sidewalk easement agreement for public use of the sidewalk. This item has been attached as a condition of approval. LDR Section 6.1.8 (Undergrounding of Utilities): Pursuant to Section 6.1.8 (Undergrounding of Utilities), utility facilities serving the development i.e. electric, phone, cable shall be located underground throughout the development. Overhead utility service lines must be placed underground. A note indicating this must be added to the plans, and the engineering plans must indicate the location of the lines to be undergrounded, to ensure that appropriate easements are provided. LANDSCAPE PLAN ANALYSIS The landscape plan provides for Oak trees along the north and south property lines with Pink Tabebuia's within the landscape strips located along the alley. In the front of the buildings two Magnolia trees are proposed with one under planted with Indian Hawthorns and the other with annuals. Cocoplum hedges will screen the vehicular use areas. Foundation plantings consist of Ixora Nora Grants. A group of plantings is proposed in front of each building. The grouping located on Lot 1 consists of 2 Alexander Palms that are under planted with Crinum Lilies and Philodendron Xanadu. The grouping located on Lot 9 consist of 2 Foxtail Palms that are under planted with Crinum Lilies and Dwarf Crown of Thorns. WAIVER ANALYSIS: Associated with this development proposal is a waiver request to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(a), which requires a 5' wide landscape strip between the off-street parking area and the adjacent right-of-way (exclusive of curbing). The landscape strips adjacent to the alley are indicated as 3 1/z' and 4 1/2' in width. The applicant has requested a waiver from this requirement. Required Findings: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the approving body shall make a finding that the granting of the waiver: HPB Staff Report Lloyd Hasner Office Building—COA 351 (Site Plan Approval) Page 5 (a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; (b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; (c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; or, (d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. The waiver request will not adversely affect the neighboring area, diminish the provision of public facilities, nor create an unsafe situation. With the existing site design, the required 5' wide landscape strip cannot be accommodated and a reduced strip is proposed. While the width of the landscape buffer have been reduced, the required hedge and tree for screening purposes has been provided, therefore, the practical application of the requirement has not been diminished. The granting of the waiver would not result in a special privilege, as the same request would and has been granted on other properties, given similar circumstances. Based on the above, it is appropriate to approve the waiver request. DESIGN ELEMENTS ANALYSIS The project consists of two two-story mixed-use structures with office space on the first floor and residential units on the second. The buildings are "mirror images" with one facing N. Swinton Avenue and one facing N.E. 1st Avenue. The style of the buildings is a contemporary adaptation of the Florida Vernacular. The exterior walls of the first floor will be finished in stucco and the second floor will be finished in cement board with a horizontal clapboard appearance. The roofs will be finished in dark green dimensional asphalt shingles. All windows are to be single hung aluminum with applied mullions. The doors are to be steel with a combination of glass panels. All doors and windows will be factory finished white. The gable at the center of the front elevation will have a decorative dental molding on the cornice. The porch and balcony supports will be 6" x 6" wood posts with decorative wood brackets at the roof intersections. The balconies and porches will all have pressure treated wood railings, which are to be painted white. Dark green shed style awnings with a Greek key drop will be installed over the entrances to the apartments on the north and south elevations; and over the first floor front center window. The body color of the eastern building (N. Swinton Avenue) will be pale beige and the western building (NW 1st Avenue will be pale yellow; all trim will be white. The decorative wood shutters are to be non-operable with open louvers. Staff comments Pursuant to the Design Guidelines, inoperative decorative shutters are inappropriate in historic districts. Shutters should measure the full height and half the width of the windows. It is not appropriate to use shutters for adjacent double windows. • HPB Staff Report Lloyd Hasner Office Building—COA 351 (Site Plan Approval) Page 6 The applicant intends to install direct mount hurricane panels for all the windows and doors; the proposed shutters are for decoration only. Staff suggests that with a slight adjustment in window sizes, operable shutters for decoration and hurricane protection could be installed on the north and south (side) elevations. However, if the dual use shutters are selected they will be made of aluminum; wood wind-load rated shutters are not being manufactured. As the shutters on the front and rear elevations add only minimal decorative impact, the applicant should consider eliminating them entirely. The proposed structure is residential in character and in keeping with the historic character of the Old School Square Historic District. Based upon the above positive findings can be made with LDR Section 4.5.1. REQUIRED FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body, which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to the Future Land Use Map, Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency, and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations. Section 3.1.1(A) - Future Land Use Map: The subject property has a Future Land Use Map designation of OMU (Other Mixed Use) and a zoning designation of OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District). The OSSHAD zoning district is consistent with the OMU Future Land Use Map designation. Pursuant to Section 4.4.24(B)(2), within the OSSHAD. The business/administrative office functions as a general contracting company and is allowed as a permitted use. Allowing more than one residential unit in a mixed use structure, and to allow the owner to lease the commercial space and residential space to parties that are not owners of the property nor proprietors or employees of the business are listed as Conditional Uses in the OSSHAD district [LDR Section 4.4.24 (D)(1) and (2)]. As previously stated the City Commission on September 15, 1998, approved the conditional uses. Based upon the above, it is appropriate to make a positive finding with respect to the Future Land Use Map. Section 3.1.1(B) - Concurrency: As described in Appendix A, a positive finding of concurrency can be made as it relates to water, sewer, streets and traffic, drainage, parks and recreation, open space, and solid waste. Section 3.1.1 (C) - Consistency (Standards for Site Plan Actions): As described in Appendix B, a positive finding of consistency can be made as it relates to Standards for Site Plan Actions. Section 3.1.1 (D) - Compliance With the Land Development Regulations: As described under the Site Plan Analysis of this report, a positive finding of compliance with the LDRs can be made, provided the conditions of approval are addressed. HPB Staff Report Lloyd Hasner Office Building—COA 351 (Site Plan Approval) Page 7 Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Site Plan Findings): Pursuant to Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Findings), in addition to provisions of Chapter Three, the approving body must make a finding that the development of the property pursuant to the site plan will be harmonious with the adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole, so as not to cause substantial depreciation of property values. The subject property is bordered on the north, south, and east by the OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) zoning district and to the west by CF (Community Facilities) zone district. To the north are existing single family houses and vacant land; to the east is a single family house, to the south are an office building/accountant (Stahl and Associates) and a single family home, and to the west is the parking lot for City Hall. Compatibility with the residences is not a major concern. The proposed use of a business office will be low intensity in nature and is appropriate in a mixed-use district. The development proposal provides a residential character that is sought with new developments within the OSSHAD zone district. The development of the sites will enhance property values in the area, and may be an inducement for the upgrading of nearby properties. As the intent of the OSSHAD zone district is to promote mixed uses, a positive finding of compatibility can be made. .r _ REVIEW BY OTHERS Community Redevelopment Agency: At its meeting of July 23, 1998 the CRA (Community Redevelopment Agency) unanimously recommended approval of the development proposal. Neighborhood Notice: Special Notice was provided to the Old School Square Homeowner's Association. Letters of objection, if any, will be presented at the HPB meeting. ASSESSMENT AND CO N-C LU S I ON.S . The proposed use is consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan and Chapter 3 of the Land Development Regulations. Due to the site constraints and to accommodate required parking, a waiver has been requested which relates to perimeter landscape strips. The waivers will not create any adverse impacts nor create unsafe situations. The development proposal retains the residential character and allows the redevelopment that is sought within the OSSHAD zone district. • HPB Staff Report Lloyd Hasner Office Building—COA 351 (Site Plan Approval) Page 8 ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Continue with direction. 2. Approve COA-351 and the associated site plan, landscape plan and design elements for Lloyd Hasner Office Building subject to conditions. 3. Deny approval of COA-351 and the associated site plan, landscape plan and design elements for Lloyd Hasner Office Building with basis stated. R- ECOMME NDED:; ACTION A. Waivers 1. Approve the waiver request to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(a), to reduce the required 5' wide landscape strips between the off-street parking area and the north/south alley to 3 '/s' and 4 '/', based upon a positive finding with LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5). 2. Approve a waiver to LDR Section 5.3.1(D)(2), to reduce the required right-of- way width for NW 1st Avenue from 60' to 40', thus waiving the requirement for this property to dedicate additional right-of-way. B. Site Plan Approve COA-351 for the site plan for Lloyd Hasner Office Building based upon positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards) of the Land Development Regulations, policies of the Comprehensive Plan and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) subject to the following conditions: 1. That a limited access easement be provided along the north side of lot 1 prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. That a sidewalk easement agreement be executed prior to issuance of building permits. 3. That the location of site lighting be indicated on the site and landscape plan including fixture details and provision of a photometric plan. 4. Provide a note on the plans that the utilities will be undergrounded. C. Landscape Plan Approve COA-351 for the landscape plan for Lloyd Hasner Office Building based upon positive findings with respect to Section 4.6.16. HPB Staff Report Lloyd Hasner Office Building—COA 351 (Site Plan Approval) Page 9 D. Design Elements Approve the Design Elements associated with COA-351 based upon positive findings to LDR Section 4.5.1(E) Development Standards with the following condition: • That operable shutters be used on the north and south elevations and the shutters on the east and west elevations be eliminated; or, • That all of the decorative shutters is eliminated from the elevations. Attachments: ❑ Appendix A ❑ Appendix B ❑ Site Plan ❑ Landscape Plan ❑ Building Elevation/Design Elements CONCURRENCY FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1(B) Concurrency as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs of the requested land use and/or development application will not exceed the ability of the City to fund and provide, or to require the provision of, needed capital improvements for the following areas: Water and Sewer: ❑ Water service is to be provided via connection to the existing 6" water main located in Martin Luther King Drive. ❑ Sewer service is to be provided via connection to an existing 8" sewer main located within Martin Luther King Drive. ❑ Adequate fire suppression is provided via a fire hydrant located at the northeast corner of NW 1st Avenue and Martin Luther King Drive, and a hydrant located on the east side of NW 1st Avenue approximately 230' south of the subject properties. Pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan, treatment capacity is available at the City's Water Treatment Plant and the South Central County Waste Water Treatment Plant for the City at build-out. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to these level of service standards. Drainage: A preliminary drainage plan has been submitted indicating that drainage will be accommodated on-site via landscape areas and an exfiltration system within the parking area. At this time, there are no problems anticipated meeting South Florida Water Management District requirements. Streets and Traffic: At its meeting of December 5, 1995, the City Commission adopted the City's TCEA (Traffic Concurrency Exemption area) designation, which encompasses the CBD, CBD-RC, OSSHAD, and West Atlantic Avenue Business Corridor. The TCEA exempts the above-described areas from complying with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. Therefore, a traffic study is not required for concurrency purposes, however a traffic statement is necessary to keep a record of trips approved in the TCEA and for calculation of traffic impact fees. The applicant has submitted a statement which indicates that each mixed-use development will generate 75 average daily trips per building (2 units x 7trips/unit = 14 and 2,670 sq. ft. office space x 24.61 trips per 1,000 sq.ft. =64 trips for a total of 75 ADT). Parks and Open Space: Park dedication requirements do not apply for nonresidential uses i.e. office space. The proposed 4 residential units will not have a significant impact with respect to level of service standards for parks and recreation facilities. However, pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.2, whenever a development is proposed upon land which is not designated for park purposes in the Comprehensive Plan, an in-lieu fee of$500.00 per dwelling unit will be collected prior to issuance of building permits for each unit. Thus, an in-lieu fee of $2,000 will be required of this development. Solid Waste: The proposal calls for 5,340 sq.ft. of office space and 4 residential units. Trash generated each year by the proposed office space is 13.52 tons of solid waste per year, and trash generated by the 4 units is 3.2 tons of solid waste per year for a total generation of 16.72 tons of solid waste per year. The trash generated by this proposal can be accommodated by existing facilities; therefore, a positive finding with respect to this level of service standard can be made. APPENDIX B STANDARDS FOR SITE PLAN ACTIONS A. Building design, landscaping, and lighting (glare) shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X _ Does not meet intent - B. Appropriate separation of travelways is made for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians in a manner consistent with objective D-1 of the Traffic Element. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent- C. Open Space enhancements described in Open Space and Recreation Objective B-1, are appropriately addressed. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent D. That any street widening associated with the development shall not be detrimental upon desired character and cohesiveness of affected residential areas. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent E. Development of vacant land which is zoned for residential purposes shall be planned in a manner which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent F. Vacant property shall be developed in a manner so that the future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; complementary to adjacent land uses; and fulfills remaining land use needs. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent G. In order to provide for more balance demographic mix, the development of "large scale adult oriented communities"on the remaining vacant land is discouraged. Not applicable _X_ Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent- ''"....... . •,... . ' --...._ .1) • , N.W.2ND STREET N.W.2ND STREET I %.• - • —5'L.A.E. - , 3'Open While .\ - - --3'Open While / ., Picket Fence \ --Bike Rack(5) Bike Rack(5) • Side Setback Picket Fence , Identific lion Sign-\ --Side Setback ir CONC.• rOI E 11111-1 l/ 7')• E --E-K b1-1 •• K----- -_I-__L-,Lr. -?—, . 7!.1M/u• . _._..___.__-/. 67,t19 1 2 tt -ir • -,1'. 2Ir-',1,_9'±-4_6:2[_'- i.., A3/1C.6 rX i5 1 _ 0 0 - I _ 771 1 rn ' -2.5' 5'Nit.- —- 5'Min. 'Pad LOT 9 Zul LoT 1 4_,. -1 I BLOCK 59 1- '51,1'--12'4 i b ,ei r- 1 ,1"--12'-7-'54 _ BLOCK 59 2,600 S.F.Office kr-rC 2,600 S.F.Office • t___3, zt (-4 1st Floor I " 6 Min. --• .H r-• --6'Min. v.) 1. 1st Floor Tr rr 8't 9' "'I:,'; 5 / 9,T8't- - (2)1 Bed Apartments .--. (2) I Bed Apartments 4,- , . —1 - 2nd Floor _,...• •,-. !.. i " 3' -. 2nd Floor th -' -3' Fx, ac I Z . • 5' - -I 1( i ..-.1 I') •1--lr.\25'—A--1------ .---. _ 131.6' I . Rear Set Proposed 5'Sidewalk \ \ Side Setback] ri Rback-/ 1 \ Side Setback-- ' 1----. Front Setback- Pedestrian Easement \ Front Setback Rear Setback LOT 2 LOT 8 BLOCK 59 BLOCK 59 ti •- --): 1TE. I'FL--A'A 1 ... , • 1 5'Sidewalk , i ix\ :0 (1) /( ) /,‘:;:) \12 i I N.W.2NI)STREET • Overhead Wily / POIC Mounted 1,1g111 Fixture 3'1)perr While ,e . ... . , i Pick i ence I Picket Felice *, '. , Porl,e;_foll.til.erl1.111111%.1or_e _ _ .._t _. , _r, .f.....„„....,,....____4,, .s.t„,...,,,k...„,....., .„.. 1 Illenti,liention Si pi I Idenlilicriliort,Sigli , 1, ' . .."7-101". 7 '' ,---."‘"----='•-•.--"i'4'1"' .:....t t-141.2.1 .7 .,...=..r: 7.-.4 ...."7"'-i, L-...... „.,4 • , ,./'' 7. ' 1. 1. / '• . /'. A di.1.-09.Cl1114'..1 ar0:1(4.1 . . ! 17.15)G.1 'a latk.AG.adlaXil.•• ' ' •. .I. s ,.', ' . ., , titill , •'• • ' 1 r.Ail,',,N.1 7.„,, \ ,r.A.",,,,,,c,;, • ,• •''cp:if&NJ 4.• T.;;.ri.,, .• ' • - ' iv- "‘..IT.u.;Ul._-_o_uLL-._-f_i! ,i_14,!:,.-- • , . r! ,,,.._„,, II 11 I 14.-..:,,,Jo.,.:._. , _or ,t,z.zi. i mr) , • 1, ( • (.1 _ ...; ' s. LOT 1 / )1: ...-- .> • 0 '' 1.41) l' II BLOCK 59 , ,, _ , '•' LOT 9 (,/ •• ''' / , / — • 7.4' Proposed Mee/ .T2A)/ I ij . r--;b [ BLOCK 59 KT')\.\''d, ) 0 Pli Apar loleols - L. I Proposed UMW .., •,Yip ) t; . LI: 1-.. ( 'It''' ---(? - (11i)/\ '; ill. w.. .., .... Apartments (!2.I (I.1. V) .?;:. . . ,, ' ••• irx\ 1'Z! ;. ..•' .' . . . . 11pliglitiop 1._( . •,) ,--,i-- . .., .. I ' •jjl‘r.7.:&533 TV....C.." .-0.6V5:F.,5iii..1 (1)-kiX fitlirIllii4Mit 'Ili ' ''.';' li '' ,.1.—J) '.--,ir,iflariaiti:t.:-xykith :/1‘,"•37.,(7:37.7 (.(:).69.i)..f..fi. . 1 ' • . • .1. -1 gi ..,..A.....,-... ,.....-1.,.., ..........,.....' • _.... .. .. .. ; \ li4t\_,. : '"Q ••• '• ,,, :,j '9 ' .. 1 L li .. .._,,,‘ _,,,, , ,3,.,.., (3,:) ; \ (ci) / LOT 2 , , m I I •x I tot(NOV CO .1. C_A:C)1.2:-- .1. LA r'l ---- CASTLE FLORIDA • ELEVATIONS BUILDING CORP. - • ....„...—.11.- -.....„ MIXED USE BUILDINGS .0 illl_b itli.0 11., 1 , „lin luiallin ',HI' um] Lit__ ___Lauunulii n luau,lin 11 it li Iunt_11,J11, 1_7--;.=-7-----___a_11 Ho 1;Iiii 11111111lItt 1, 1 0111 li 1111 11,J111 11.1114_,...„, --,-,7_,--f -U1111111111.11 II UIIII !WILD llii ILI! 1.1 11 U III U1111 U 1110111‘ 1.11Proilli u, - 01111 U1[11_11'111 U1111111111_111111 U1111 U 111_1111111.111_11U1111.1J illi u il on IJ iilli u t(11_11 I, ,: uilll U1111111111 U1111111111111111 VIII 1J1 1111111111,011 U1111111111 ,, unli U1111111111 PHI u1,, _ ,-10-a • - - _-- _ M i 1 1 - -- ------ - I . .. .___.. i -- -___ ,..___ IIIIIII 1 _ _ -:_-__-----===j1 ------= FT-- _ • , . IIH 77-1, 1 1 M 0 .. ff. O g i I a I 9 5 1 I I 5- 1 1 P '..-—1—I Hg1 1 m H L__±J " i ' PH FL! .• • •.•.•.. / , )1 I • .••. •... ...•.. • :..••••••:.•:;;•.- ELEVATION OC.•164 " . • • • • ....• ..ildrailb...' .. •••• .....dgrillk... id111611110(111"-Mligadigilliiiiirranininglininhip.. Unir• -• 111111111111111111... :. .- :-... .-AIFIMICII113Mm idnimmaniant..._ ..mmism.--drallngimamenfin - -- - ouNIIIM11111111111Mlin. . '..-. „dafireMITTP---..... 11011Maniniffigill - = 111111111111111111111111MEMEh... - - ......manzwinam-II I I I II MNIMIMI= imunnmupummunmumub..... 1 1 i . nmmunmannanoinnam - . ,...C CI. . .' 7= - 1.1 'E. --.-. El -...1 w „...... = - - ''- '=" Fra. i :---.. -• II =----- 2 ma- ' ,-iiii.'- =mom 1111k=1 -1=m-a=1M- XII''..---2 = MMI _.-a,„ a......_ . i — 2,0,S1.4. • .0 , ---...----..”---... .•----.....---.....---..- .....--- • .al i '•‘1. . 5. -• — iiii 2 ----. 1 Q --, . 1 1 111111111 'I L___ p- „-.... • . 1 1 \t.~i,r,,Nv.5wAiF.Nsvv,•Lvsif,CWNWAKxv"Wi-' q~(NNNS,N VA = = = = = IG..-.!--',T SIDE ELEVATION r_ A-4 R . : . • . . . .. • - . . . . .- .... .1..:- . -. .-. ... .. - • ELEVATIONS CASTLE FLORIDA • BUILDING CORP. MIXED USE BUILDING �i11 111i n 1IJI G _.li •IU PIII „1111 II, ,I 111 I1 11 I 1 • 11 111m -1 11 1b+., 1 1�IIIIf111111Yr 11�p111Mt I • I II F l u II ..-1--. 1 n1mn1�11 lalm I___...„.___I si111mn1111p11111 Ina.,_111III II rill II 111gUnummniunqui ■� I11�111111111n11111111111111i. I Ti 1 I 1 hi wm.na■ 11111W11�I1ullall1111�111111�1111111111111f1111111111111n1u1111111i. . 111�U111111mmi m 1NtllWIIitullI INIWU11111 ICI IIIII�U I It I IIIII1n1I11g1111(I I I IV I:• a nt .., III II 1 I I I,I III II II 1 II II I III I I Ill III III III 1 II 11 III I II 1 II I III 11 II 111 1`- to C. n' —0 1 1 ==U ' I 1i - iI gam. 1 , it=m , 1 - - I _ :U r_R Pita • ial M I I I E g I I I I I = ie .Pt.IR LEFT SIDE ELEVATION • • n A t, u u 11 P .410114.4' 1L 1 i��l I 11� 1.i� I LI L II I1 - - �w 1 1 1 1 1 '.....1/UI11111IIII11111111101IIIDU1111iJ.1J Ill!111 1!1 I 111 1 :0111��Rn1�11t10111111111111111111t11111111Min:'_11 J I ,L11ll .111 II 11 11 1�, = E r E r ^ - t E H �..,(1 I 1 11 11 II I 111 IIIIIIIII _ o'oa, ...:..;n:...IL::;., ..1.,_! i—'--- , 1 \ \, __ —---:- — I-4 1-- MIL . .a..__,--i_ — I y € pp 4I I rp s-R PA : s - `l 0l r i IIIf IjI � I i P I I o r. ` ! mill ^i. ...�I . I_ .-� -J • ..F_R ill22 FRONT ELE VAT ION )A . - FLOOR PLANS LDINGS 57'-6' . ' 1 3,-5, 79'-1' d'o' 4•-lI. 6'-7, 4'--i}' 5; 6'-11' 3'-2' 3'-1' 3'.7' 6'4' E" a'-Cr i I R2;65,1 I i I I 1 • L i•N _ i _ _ G^Jt�'6^1'J.^.TIOV 7•e.+ :r 6.+Y © 1. y ,Y ,- -+ p -I--� w CLc I f I I 1 DATrI t p O � 1?0.GN.TQ i �• m 11�- j4 ,- �I'r 4• r•o• �t li•-J• ,,,,..._:R41 -,•_o.r a. I. ODIC[6 I I I le L1i •0 ` / -- m. _AT B'-II' I 4'.1. 7'_6•118 s II on I I G=�GE X '. �- I `/ xe0 �I'a q IY 4050Y I II II I r � x•S -ter-+ (T �'�7� i an �� lzp Y II �J ' ti'� IY I I S_Y_- 1 8I I IC'Cn I Y '^ I IGC Z I I I 76.O T:�2 ^. I p$11 Y I n� .D �, I ; 73 IC GO �• /Jc�4N.T. 11 I I d i I N 5' I3•lb' 9..t_� 4'0 1'-B 4- I •-6" 4 —� 5,4/ \ t, 5•_4' I 16. 4.-6, �_7. 5,7•-4' B' 4'-9• 5' -L-- y'ml Ib _ r tT 1 I I- III I !.J I M10 1 I � "_6" 93 I I D � 1 1� ' 0 ICc 3 m 5 i mI _B 7'! •�• ( 1 ' 6''7' r� 0' I ' 0 C'G'6 .12 •' :' I IIgtl s9cT.:1,1 I s ^.0!vE¢Z%a r c;.6 II 1 1 �9n1IIIII Ti nD 7lmOCT I I I 7 m / II �, 1 jr-�_j - r.r.- n T I , h _I 4" ,_ CIy 4.-6. � < 3C0O dt _ I@ ^x/ 11 D o ry IV c>, '^ e " =1:E 2 . —•- )c c.Ln t* il I I 14•-2' II 0 11 1 r I It r I - I II ao I lI II,5'.b'-;,. 3'-10' p -,._c. d �'-e• 11_C• — 1 1. __- 1 l Ir . I 1 �I GE I 0 015l:E 2 I. �; 9 •— — --.- . \ Q r l I m+r-'-- I I _.JDrV 1.^.E I - 1 I J r-11.1,1 3'-T I , -, IC 0.n / 3'-11" I 3=7'1 I I'-II' -1I'/ ' 'Lc�r�tF 7651. 0 .. 76`+1 3 r>•-I✓� a .. I \ 0 B — 1 '1"I �Y I , 1 1 'y�^ n �S s— 1 I I E`s/'/�_�j :-76'}I m II.\_rty.•L- , —__, b'I I .-0' I, .. l -T b-2 :-Y l �'.C' b1 b-G' 6� I. 57'-6' ! UN I i 'A' UN I i ' ' A/0 AAA 9Jfi 9�� A A PO 1654 5„^..- c ;T;p:7�^I 51 522: FCT.:a". H 51 SIFT. TOTAL AeA r141 50FT. OIj- 1_v_1 i_ i./iN 202AL A1=A 1043 50- SCALH, lid '• - 1' - �•• " CASTLE FLO BUILDING C MIXED USE B • 52'-6• • 6•-5• 3T-1- t6'-2- i i ,•-5' 3 5'_0- 1.0-10' 5'-0•O '^J '�•�b- �- 011 I rx,xaw /� , I l f. 1 I 11 I •I C !' LIN n e1 n m „"' xaoeo I-+t- 1 '6 m x S11.. .,� _, _ I A 1 { I - D• C'-O' •t I-C• H6• 13'-5' D• IS'- <• 13'-<' I 5 0;' H ie Dr.! P-INIRR. Qj b fr7 C'GL 9 r C. b r1aDT M GIN.' iF! jb C{ C'GG 10'GG .D r _ I. I I3'-6' 1 3'-6 <• <'-8• I i . 1 in 1I II I� < 4.• D. 2.•W.4c 7eCT•C. Zf, 1 -- '1.‘"'''''' I - . e"../ .1 I I Ll di i I \ ::. . I 1 I I a�il�o s1I 8 I I I .0 .9 ON JINII.;.R^JM I '1 � i 1`L;., !� I I I I '' s -y.� mQ m lc.:-.1.. . Y I 11 16 in -6' r IL-6• '1 <.. 1 b <•. —b.�.C� J D- I<'.g• Z. c'.6` Dp•1 \ I Q.T. Y — r g T~ , <: o=WALL o_I Zr.' — I $!I r C� IC—Y. 1 $ m ---�— <I a .lsl iv S � I.{ L I-- i Via_ a.?DC D• m •�I � Q w. . 18."2° c• 5 3 CI .46• "1 6-6I -D° �•I IGc 1 I b-'t !il \ IMrt I. I d0 a dui IA a.+c m in i, I, S 4•_3•_. 1•_<'.. r - <9 (�"I,d' -D-I O I I'-8•I C•-<• `� D: *- - I 1lD .. I' t . . --- I LIvIN,lr-. _ LI o'ryl R ' 1 — — IC'GK. e— 21r c ;'i O-o AN I • _" ^i L7-2• I 8- • 19•-C• B1:';'? . k. y-- anlrx e 1 , _I �` I I• 1 • II �I�lP:S QJJM m 1. yeo I +G:T:i+iV Q -J•c. I 1 _�• I I y :�� I rxl xaaN © -• ia -5' IBl TT'-6• I 8- IC-D• '.s° 1'.- 6-2• l5 .D L '1' I I1 ' F a v O :er.'. .t'c° 1: I m 1.0 C.-.C. x.w WARS, I LI 13 - '-b• -2 6•-2. 5'-2. 13-6• r 6 • 52-6• • 4I}j /fie_ I�yJ i I u I I I I 1 C 1 LI I I I T I>r? 1 IZJ="!L 1622 5C:T. LY AAA %_ 5G:. - Ht-L.^.O•.'T 84 SC.R. 94204T HALOONY 10 9G-T.-F S:<CV•"Y 20 52R. I , I A 1 I �4R HL�'-...:O T 20 SO?. •' AREA Mb SOFT. • TOTAL AAA 1055 Sr.-7. T 9G GL._. lit •• 1• - p.. , 1 11 STAFF REPORT HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD Project Name: COA-360, associated with the Sundy Inn Project Location: 116 S. Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is that of approval for the relocation or demolition of a contributing single family residence; and, the demolition of the non-contributing garage. BACKGROUND The house was constructed in 1940, the garage was constructed in 1952. The house was in private ownership until it was purchased by St. Paul's Episcopal Church in the 1970s. The church recently sold the property to the developer of the Sundy Inn. The Sundy Inn has contracted to give the house to Mr. and Mrs. Bruce McKeever with the provision that the HPB approves its relocation; and that the relocation can occur as soon as possible. The vacated lot will be used for an expansion of the Inn's gardens; a small green house; and a temporary valet parking lot. PROJECT" DESCRIPTION Relocation Proposal The proposal consists of moving the house to a vacant lot on N. Swinton Avenue in the Old School Square Historic District (Lot 2 Block 66). The lot is owned by Cathy and Bruce McKeever who also own the lot and house adjacent to the north and located at 275 N. Swinton Avenue. The McKeevers received site plan approval from the HPB on June 17, 1998 to convert their current single family residence (275 N. Swinton Avenue) to a hair salon. They plan to relocate the subject house from 116 S. Swinton to their adjacent vacant lot and to use it as their residence. The garage will be demolished. A site plan for the relocated house will be available at the meeting. The McKeevers will return to the Board for approval of the landscape plan as well as any exterior changes proposed for the structure. Meeting Date: October 7, 1998 Agenda Item: II-B HPB Staff Report COA-360 Page 2 Proposed Use of the Vacated Lot The following narrative provided by the architect describes the proposed use, plans will be available at the meeting: A 12' x 18' green house will be placed on the northwest corner and will be surrounded by landscaping. A brick walk will extend from the Sundy House entrance area to the green house. A 4' high fence will enclose this landscape area and make the greenhouse a part of the Sundy gardens. On the portion of the lot not used by the greenhouse a temporary, non- required, valet parking area will be installed. The temporary lot will accommodate approximately 12 spaces. This parking lot will be laid out and landscaped in such a way as to inhibit a direct view to the lot from Swinton Avenue. The necessary lighting and irrigation for this lot will also be provided. STAFF' COMMENTS Relocation of the House The style, design, scale and mass of the house make it extremely suitable and appropriate for the proposed new location on N. Swinton Avenue. From the streetscape point of view and the character of the historic district, it is a desirable infill solution for the vacant lot. Proposed Use of the Vacated Lot Pursuant to Section 4.4.24 (C) greenhouses are allowed as an accessory structure in the Old School Square Historic Arts zoning district; and, pursuant to Section 2.4.6(H)(d) temporary parking lots are also permitted. Additionally, temporary parking lots may be used to supplement required parking. Temporary parking lot permits must be approved by the Parking Management Advisory Board and the City Commission and are valid for one year. Permits must be approved yearly and are only allowed for a period of 3 years. The site plan for the vacated lot must be submitted to the Planning Department as a modification to the Sundy Inn proposal. Therefore, no formal action on the site plan will be considered at this meeting Temporary parking lots may contain gravel or pearock. Staff suggests that the parking lot contain paver blocks to match those approved for the Sundy Inn. • HPB Staff Report COA-360 Page 3 ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Deny, the demolition with reasons stated. 2. Approved the relocation or demolition with a 6 month delay. 3. Approve the relocation of the structure and demolition of the garage, as presented. RECOMMENDATION , No formal action is required by the Board with respect to the proposal for the vacated lot. The proposal including site plan, landscape plans .and design elements must be reviewed by the Planning Department before consideration by the HPB. Based on positive findings to Section 4.5.1(E), approve the relocation of the contributing residence and demolition of the garage as presented, with the following condition: • That the new owners return to the Board for review of the landscape plan and for any exterior changes or alterations which are proposed for the structure. File/u/ww/coa360sr 0 n '1 1 I � 1r•ti. Nf n,r ir,i.... ta 03 ......... ie.+ ..‘ ‘t\r/SV" N ) t 14 /1. • .� .. 1,�� / r • 1 1 • 1 4 j . 1 .%.,..,„...• .. :.-*' ' • '"gt i'r•• / J` • 1 ,:ii' a n,':.i/r/ 4. // r.'i /.1 fr srr♦,Ana 4 maim or Amore raw. xi ) \I. 7 .x;'.b..i...,,,,f.,••,. - .... Ar ftliiiiiiii,:W . ,_ : ',.... ..."7....... . . . • . • , . • •. . • • - i • 4-Ci (11 LAt.,,........ , I . ki x 'R ; • • 1. . / . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e . . . . . . % 4 1 � 'McCw}►mq 't'IOr'�Y NL MA4x M. ttL • • , • �^ il `1,.I�1� • iiwY IOW . ��..� Elr 0oarr rrce ./. . . ��C� al al , pyri.:-.-3.--- t I x $Th POI AND ASSOCIATES Z4 2500 N.FEDERAL HWY.NO2 FORT LAUDERDALE FL 33305 1 f SITE PLAN — TEMPORARY PARKING LOT li( . Jl> T©wt ' N Wall '''�. lay 2 •�8 N c 0 n• ri 0 N lD co ,- .11.". ;".„alliiiir,.ik .„, 0' 0 Sli, ko { ��t11iiiilligiristi..,-;:,;,-p.-:, IVI ,.,,? r. liel.. ,..... ;_,�;;���1i111(Ill'.II `,; i„ �0' w. _ 0_ r al , ./1 . "m 0'1) � ellI1 tw 2 i •uVI iimuhl ci * 1P.4 �� rr�;l� ij alb HE iil30 �fI t3 I r 1 lie -� •,.. ........ ... Nit 4.. IF ' .- /r0.� ., .- j,r -% ��, Ail ell liwa !� ..-Jr. i At /IP 6111:1/71‘11 ari!:;,: -.. . ---...'-- ...----iii (III /41111 .7" - ts, r 0 4/%4 ,,,,-,::-,:::-:.-.. ::„ y.::,.,...,...:.:::,..;-,:::.. ;: \ lfl in 41 {: :- :::1ti: + :`:l "::: :::r::rF;f;:.- i■R NORTH II r11i_ i riiiil� r!l `: ` • ':a •::r::::: :; Kj ; ,t-; .:i Qla ,t _ I�ia }K .:1 ( : .. ... a i- co p rJ , t L if o I-,_ . oLi ill, II - _- _ ‘ _..___.ram -1 +0� ,4I .,.��- ai , -..0 - . . N AND ' 1�csa■tessmanl�a 'el169 .1.- ej FORT LAUDERU�II$F;<,, ss�06 0 N.W. 3RD ST. N.E. 3RD ST. PROPOS - M MIN LOCATI thu - w > > >ENM Mil MIN v L°J > > a a a V MIN a act CITY == Q cr ATTORNEY MIMI BUILDING == , 11111 W -_ MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DRIVE N.W. 2ND ST. N.E. 2ND ST. I I z " Z W 0 D co 1- x cn Z i -r W Z CITY HALL Q z 4 z N.W. 1ST ST. N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST / ST. — 1 a COMMUNITY u_i > z z CENTER 3 Z cc z 0 a I TENNIS OLD w STADIUM SCHOOL a I SQUARE ATLANTIC AVENUE 1 I 11 1 1 POLICE SOUTH I( I I 1ICOMPLEX COUNTY Z COURT > > HOUSE > > 0 a N— I ¢ < I— '''if , .yr Z :1 !! c_.,, ' > I � I (r) S.W. 1ST ST. S.W. 1ST ST. S.E. 1ST ST. r- x Li zo I in In— or CURRENTLOCATIO' 3 3 3 § w I vi vi U) vi Lc, • -�- - RELOCATION OF SINGLE FAMILY HOME — CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL FROM: LOT 11, BLOCK 62 TO: PAR 2, STRATFORD ATTA BOWE PL. PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM290 STAFF REPORT HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD Project Name: COA-358, Henry Dean Office Building Project Location: 251 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is that of approval for the renovation of a non- contributing professional office building. BACKGROUND The building was constructed as a single-family residence in 1958 and was converted to a professional building in 1976. As no change of use or addition to the floor area is proposed, a site plan review is not required. The property is located within the RO (Residential Office) zoning district. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposal consists of the following: • Replace all windows (awning and glass jalousies) with bronze colored aluminum single hung and fixed windows. Location of fixed and sash windows is indicated on the attached floor plan. All window glass to be tinted bronze. • Replace the front (south) door and the rear (north) door with raised panel metal doors. • Replace the metal carport supports with reinforced 16" x 16" columns to be finished in stucco to match the building. • Install a wood louvered Bahama shutter over the second front window from the west, to be painted Driftwood. • Face the existing 1' tall brick planter which extends along the front facade with coral rock; install a hedge in the planter. Extend the coral rock wall across the front of the existing handicapped access ramp and raise the wall to the height of the ramp railing. • Resurface and restripe the parking lot. • Installation of direct mount wood hurricane panels. Meeting Date: October 7, 1998 Agenda Item: II-C HPB Staff Report COA-3582 Page 2 • Paint the exterior; main color Navajo White (pale beige); trim to be white. STAFF COMMENTS Preserving the Residential Character in the RO (Residential Office) Zone district. Bronze windows are most commonly used in contemporary commercial buildings. The Board generally considers bronze windows inappropriate for residential structures and for residential structures converted to commercial use. The subject property is located in the RO (Residential Office) zoning district where, pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.17(H) Special Regulations, All buildings and structures shall appear to be residential in character regardless of the actual use therein, shall be kept in a sound and attractive condition, and in established neighborhoods shall be generally compatible in architectural style and scale with the surrounding area. The RO zoning district was established in 1984, buildings constructed or converted prior to this date are not necessarily residential in appearance. The structure is technically not historic, but the installation of bronze windows in a 40 year old building may result in loss character to the facade. The defining characteristics of the building are the pattern of fenestration and the horizontal emphasis of the eyebrow canopy and the parapet. Dark windows tend to recede which will de-emphasize the importance of the fenestration, thus lessening the residential origins of the building. Additionally, the use of fixed windows often denotes a commercial structure. However, fixed panes were successfully used at the BSA office (9 N.E. 2nd St.) while still retaining a residential character. Staff suggests white aluminum windows, lightly tinted, would retain the residential character of building even with the use of fixed glass. Rock Wall in Front of the Handicapped Ramp. The wall should be constructed so that the top remains horizontal and does not follow the downward slope of the handicapped ramp railing. Foundation planting should be installed at the base of the wall. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 1. Deny with reasons stated. 2. Continue with direction. 3. Approve as presented. 4. Approve with conditions. HPB Staff Report COA-3583 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION Based on positive findings to Section 4.5.1(E), approve COA-358 with the following conditions: • All fixed and single hung windows are to be factory finished white aluminum and may have lightly tinted glass. • The rock wall to be constructed in front of the handicapped ramp will be the same height and not follow the downward slope of the railing. Foundation planting is to be installed at the base of the wall. File/u/ww/coa358sr ... IP —. __ ••-• , _-- .t •• . . . ...5-1•5 •-7-1 • c-•-' ••- -1'•vi - o• -6. - 1 ,77 . ,.• ' • . _.:.i_,,_____t • . i • l Az;Ir'-fe•-•1 (• i ;:.. --_-=••• ...00 d•..; , • , • . ! .:-.. ..i. "kti . , • • , I I , , . 1 . • , I M • •:1 • . ' • ' •• , . ..T t,•-•-• • .-.. ,... ,_ I r • i i • • 1-- i":' ,f 444c_ • I • • • VT-1/7,..)P 0 V••-i_c ; . • , • 1 '1 54-rw.2 , . ..... 1 ,...,n.../.‘....Jr_Ty ,a..:.--• ••;_': mi., il C-1 a-CAA-2 • •1 T•e, •_.t. ' • • 'T•T cic... -.• ,..Z. , I I • ie. 1 I • • • . .• /.3.L K 9 • • . .• :. • .. . . • :• , . 1, • ,.1............. t , • . •• • •• ' I *1 . .•, : 4 . _ ..,. •-•`.=-• 'Z.'.::•=e•••• .! ... —---- .-----— zt L I : ... is / 14,1-rc_um..-, c....b....,:.. e.,==•••••••! i. . :•i U.. in ',..., / il 6".:.:•.. —6..:TZ. -••I /3< /ii I, --r L.A.,. lag.‘...2. . 1 ....I • ...) , \ • i •. !-: . . , ! • 1 • , ,..,.., • i /0.„.. /3 . • . . r.... = .....,_ .-. --: -••••••"( • 1----. : • • - IC.l-CL ,.• .,40- I ... -/ ..4. : fbil:'.• ,.7 • . .- • :.1 •:. ....,-••••-1 lii •••••-••••••••••••••--• •r---..• Lt.."11,-)c-, =•._,=)c./A. it. 1:'.. fz......7.....,c...*.- -e• I!• . .-- ,v__. . ...._.... : , A it .........ta , I • 7• : i• . ). •:,' •II • C.c..=_ =•=V._-r• , , . . . 1 41 I I/1) 4.2 X ;).'D • . ,-: 1 ••••• SO ! - - i---.-- .--•• ••=71 .,,i I • :11.4 1 ••,, ...Ns' ' - • 4-.. t J • S. '..k., _,•••=a_a_C.,011. . Cs6 ••••,...Z.. EL-IC.-1._r."...?_-t• =• .CJ4,. • i f I-41.. . \ • . !yr,or a.• ,e,....PO ...*• I;I . *."....1 ........". I. .1 ...”.....1,•••••••• 1........, • . ir4 i. i LTh 41 ;1 1 -..---k•--.........-....-,.. . ,......L., • , 461/4 OM : "-4 . ..- : 1 I ' I : 11..LN-.3 t 1 I 1 I - • . . _....;.. ,-,-4 . • •••••5-'• 54-L- ! !.rJ.X' . 1 ifaE• • • ... -•—• • • • - i- L 0 0 • P p - 1 .(2._.... 1..,j •... - --.----- ...a...-.• — . • .-. • .........., 10....... ll.'llt.tt• S.7.7k-Fr.:=7.., AR T..4 1.7_,C_C T ••••..., a•,... ..T.:•••••_.R-4 :::',...,1-••••••a,.....C. : CHARLEZ E. To .7:i P..1.A. . • E."•:. -1- "'-C") •••M l.s. ...,..:r...L) A-1=2,.. T•11 : ....1......T.c Ave. . P2,.: ...-"- •'.1 ........,:, :c••••_.I. !"-i•_!.: :..... •::. Dr,.:,T L....lC3. FLA. •. . . F_- f/x5z3 Pi9i2)47- • . ... . • ..... 51//1Ja• 61V/1)6- S',1-5# ..- 4 r,,....i;,..,. ,_ , , :-.1....-___.1_-_ , u.......„..,...,., ..._ t -- .--"'• - �.t��.. .-_: :-1.�� _ _ µ•me"„.. _ �••.•.`F — _- ..�•��--.�;rii - ..w4:._�.''.r'�v�. _ .(Y\� '$ r ,31.,.:�i• ,Js ,Y • �``. •`,.1 :, +=��r •1`'��r� �t.• tkj. , L� r •,^'`_J' tni. . '.ye.t�tl 1 • r r e 4 1f.�^ f�l-J i � l.i.' 3� S' 1��": tY {. ]r. �/' :1+' k ..':: r '}: t. rvt•:' t,. 9 , 1 r l 4: jni i l;S4 ° : ' a . r' !. t _ /J. :+ a'' ': r I • ��. 1 ) 1jni�'(S r::�'-i! ''i r.: 1 . �ii � � A ;� �J t ...! ` �• ^r' '!.1. ` 'a, .f)j;t r::.:a ri ii tr r :1.:1; ��i^ t''`) .' •'�'• .. •? � ai:�?1'�itx�YJ ,i -••••. ji "' •Of t 7 1 -S`I i� ;C• 1 . § �I ��� \'�+•I ot? }'fir ,,55 1, _ wr-t _ r�3 n r !:ç" � i xi • 1 •r 1 c: , 1[ •• ' • + i 1}.fs 7 y r 1 :::::.S?I+ii _'• i. r..r^^.� 1 tl 1 • 1 L �_\. •r- 1 ti\l'-'1 7 C/ t.. fA SI. it ... r_. _ is .+�J Str 1 f }1:�.�to i.¢ . -i.lF.i(_ fz-a{ir• -/� t... �_r (•,. >. A.f - 7 �' `tjzj; ;:^ _'_ter,71... .-. i i;V• .t aP�a.,' -, X .) 1 - �r ,y:.•'•i+rtu,�l`?-' 1 1 a {')+ ' ,'1�� d r C•(r( '� r'S� i, j ,— .'•9.i v ; ,•LS�CS•t r.[ `) t �}� - _ LiPI j• S_r.}n i ti i S Irr X, 1'.t'•J;:'./ 1 r. : N�,r,l:, iI;� �1'S{ ,,� ,.z.3 11% 77�ij : ; yy i�J • *t'll.);i' �'• y dt`'�Ii�=� • r• r • . ,Jir r; -y{)3g !i• 'p .4+•.. -•s• �t �►A—`�-�awi • � 4'`�"rK i•L,tlQil��i 1 A;,v. i'1 �` .1,S',I,il -- l 1•, J���1 ..„„PM„ �� �L =� t r NJI ? li � t;��1! ` rC�< ?f't?3+ r 1�^:�` 7 - `�'�. mow.t � '�`� ..a • �. '�"4 � ''`-� i��!1�t. _1:14:44._A __`r:iFl—• uf: �,i ''1 �-Jtlj' .: 4\ . , ..: ..,,, ___.,,-.....,..„.:\ , . 1. . \ , , ...i- -r ---Z. ,C?, \ ` it t r-- ._ _ i i 4 = ' r _ 3 1 tit1 `'131 c ,4. ' 5 r 1-��. t ,L ._ ii.. "'....1'1-.;, a 1 i+4,34-'1 ..., .1141:1+ yak y�y ,:.:1_,-<-' ',..--. - ice;- 3 — ..�.44y�' 1' _i :.. „ � ;. X is • -..'.•1n•:,•... .•ems -1 LEGAL s G R I P T t o N: • TNL CAtT NALr Of LoT 20 ALL Of LoTS 11 AND 11. AND • LoNIrJG DIS T Icr: RIA - 10 LOT I. fSLo CK 11, DLL 1DA PARK • ARCA Of PRorLKrj • 13,633 .7 nl FT • .SS A CI.•. OLLRAY ALAGil, fLORIOA 2S• •., .— TYPL of DLVLlnPwl6Nr: inaf6s•.n.1.na. of/,.;f. /; • pwnN....,0 .P•ce•. I.G:/v.•.eoI U. / ! • pAe,RI114 SI...0 C 1 pno r•c C I.: II ! "�--��Ne11 rM d iti. •• bncuuD F LooIL t1.n4 or r., : 7,cr c•.c,n♦1D • I7100 P RoR •( _ eCC eb. 1. • To T.a FI 'Ill; wn6 C. : ,.a• C..1,J.T•..e,....7 ti•n,uK•fl!..• L INL at 1 . ; 40 • LANDSe.Nji nnr o . ;1,4.41 Se \tv L 1 47 V. •• Pon.C.114 ..w .ra r• nnr,43 .,ot.x.s f / w/, • vN • • P41LU.•J(3. ..C1..I.rS ; 1�•t I 37•1( •1.' T 61 / t.''.' /... .. S/'...,. s).1.0. ...Z(‘ //\ :.0. k'',;----.., V 1. • w 0 )14'. .._J° • 4t // 4'4 I. k •L ‘7 , C,- / V / y1 P 1 L Q1 h'. V DL u 7RF s11'/ \\ ryyo:' '1 .: rr (o A N.w ` 4 1 ...cA I30, \ ♦ b e1*r1( otYR} 7• ♦, ^ h w\ 0. 2 1 STORY •• 4' f+ o ,, 1n1C[L /•/•t. 4,:414 ./ • .__�_ ADDITI. •► /^� • \� i lines \i' .I L t. �." V .._ . j'�• 1 /yl,r? t•Arlo ' \Tr Z�t LC* N•.�:! V.•✓fnie I,IL r .. • ...r�•7• h Aa,i/y,'%\V ..-�~•�•4ow... 7��• D .._..: ( • _a.,i q o • . I y ���.• _ }�,CO ,O-p�� ?/ • P R o P L R i Y L 1 N L et C IL I ♦♦\� ! /CANT( �a��(f y IV '�. NLwN 1 / ° e t L' • / ' F `c o*��47. It 4 \G \ •o R �� b XL4. . / • /1L ` t. oL4 ♦( „ 1 ..aown L.3n T 3 Foe. ♦Ib.,l \\\4.1. 1 \ / ( _ /j i. ... c / (. 'N.1 To wa.oa� (1 :nraL.l o..! /.1. (t.• 1' 4 7 U '," % e.t o e \f 'rF O #'.. 4e�( ,; .•C<i^:' slb•,s ...so .,/r.,.1710 .e::e,... lNa NC1wL) ttt \ a 1•� } '(. :: tr :... y4♦ L.,tw. 4.J�•. !n♦f tTO Twt �• NI) 1 ri 1, V, a,1 .t 7 ::rlyr. +♦ O vt �L•• r • it (. 1, \' ' V \ 9 •. 5 I T E P L n N \ \ 3 G. A L C: I • 10 i. IONAL OFFICE for COR.A LEE 12-EYNOLD5 , V.. P. T r•1.- -1 • oew,. . l E. OTH 1_A.I.A. - /,QCIl1T Ec r • ea.vo. etLawY •ooaess : I.77 .+.e„ 61 s II/,r? E _...._._._. ..._.i.VEa•.<( pC•1•.) e,S.3.•So t[T..t : =ye flat•I. .-,,,.r , .eLfwY n0 171•5o If n .76•T.!: f.._ , 7 ssss�CSCDY Su 1.n,.ta,.3/l 4 ....pis , 4 3.3.../. 11.5 S7 oe,nwY AL.c.. O3 Norc[1 GOt ..,w. 1n3T wv f C. uelL•Y .�.. Cr4 r:�7 ..... _ .. . 1n I.w. 7F CI IV 13 MnY 7.t F IIII . II II I I I I I 12 TH II � S T. N.E. p / - la BOND WAY N i 4 Z I2 2 N.W. 11TH ST. N.E. 11TH ST. _ I - W v • W I I O L - - N.E. S. 10TH ST. , - o rn - ' N.E. ST. Li - N.W. 9TH ST. iiiAiiiiiiii_ MOM IIIIIIllIii=llz I mii. _>- N.W. 8TH ST. N.E. 8TH ST. GEORGE BUSH - BOULEVARD -¢ j:oniiu: w I J W QP , ¢1.6i :InInI:N.E. T , ,�c) l p COURT H ST. I I- N. J ■. , N.E. 7TH ST. N.W. 6TH ST. l S O O r------� N.E. 6TH ST. Z z ACURA �• 0 0 . D ♦ , m m OF w i = DELRAYz- DZ<-(' P♦ o m � BEACH 3 Z .�- O Z Z z O N.E. 5TH TERR. M I N.E. 6TH ST. I- )Z ♦ , • �♦ , 41. o0 z z �,,, z } , Q N.E. 5TH CT. ' I I (n. LriS v .E_.�� 5TH ' ST. ki `Q�C0 Oc ¢ TRINITY N.E. 5TH ST. LC L U THERAN C �Ll lJ u z IL. } WAL- y: z _\GREENS i I LAKE IDA ROAD N.E. 4TH ST. N.E. 4TH ST. Lv POST > Q- Q Q CASON < OFFICE < D- D- METHODIST I- z m o z CHURCH ly; w w L_ z z z 0 N HENRY DEAN BUILDING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL 251 DIXIE BOULEVARD PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL B4SE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM2BB STAFF REPORT , HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD Project Name: COA-339-Continuation, Liz Bold, Owner. Project Location: 1104 Nassau Street ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is that of approval of COA-339 to allow a porch/deck to be constructed on a portion of the front façade, and along the eastern portion of a new room addition. BACKGROUND . .. ... On February 18, 1998 the Board approved the enclosure of a screened porch to create a room addition on the east elevation of this contributing single family residence. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project consists of the construction of a deck/porch which will be 13" above the ground and 7" below the level of the floor. The porch will be installed on the east (side) and north (front) elevations of the addition and will continue west to the front door steps. A 3' high railing with decorative balusters and finials will surround the porch; the railing will be supported by 4" x 4" posts set 6' apart. A 6' space in the railing will be provided to accommodate the French doors on the north elevation. The porch will be 7' wide around the new addition; the portion which runs in front of the original house will be 5' wide. A 13" wood lattice infill will be installed between the porch floor and the ground to screen the porch posts. The deck, railing and lattice infill will be painted white. STAFF COMMENTS The porch will provide a buffering effect between the house and the street. It will lend continuity to the addition and the original structure while adding dimension to the north (front) facade. The applicant will bring a sample of the balusters to the meeting. Staff recommends that low foundation planting be installed in front of the lattice. Meeting Date: October 7, 1998 Agenda Item: II-D 1 HPB Staff Report COA-339-Continuation Page 2 ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS_ 1. Continue with direction. 2. Deny, with reasons stated. 3. Approve as presented. RECOMMENDATION Based on positive findings to Section 4.5.1(E) and the Design Guidelines, approve the deck/porch as presented, with the following condition: • That low foundation planting be installed at the base of the lattice infill. file/u/www/coa239s2 /MrTLi I Li VETERANS BARR d _w I N PARK TERRACE c W w ATLANTIC CONDO o DELRAY BEACH l I z PLAZA < III N < MARRIOT ATLANTIC WII I c / WATERWAYEAS T A V E N U EEJIL I I > , COMMERCIAL —_` < 1 `` I CONDO ' I In < 1 I C -- z--vi vi a �', 1 BAR o I o I >- HARBOUR o m < CONDO III S.E. 1STI ST. MIRAI I 1 I IAR STREET i I I I I I LJ c J I Q Z I OCEAN PLACE II CONDO0 COCONUT ROW I I I I Z INGRAHAM S.E. 2ND ST. AV NUE I LJ OCEAN TERR. 0 SEAGATE OCEAN TERR. I I 0 TOWERS 1 I I L 11 I N I ` IN A S S ALA SIT.' 1I II II , :::®1� I Z � S.E. 3RD I ST. Cn > BAY •■® I � 0 Li � ..1U LANIKAI VILLAS CONDO Q LANCER WAY • .\ s, Lv N.,vi z �' S.E. 4TH ST. SEAGATE C CASUARINA ROAD \ MANOR o iii I oLL in 1z 2 N I >I—//// N -:- BOLD RESIDENCE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL PLANNING &ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MA? REF: LM215 STAFF REPORT HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD Project Name: Coa-361 Mannweiler Project Project Location: Block 1, Lot 10, Del-Ida Park Historic District, N.E. 7th St. TE M BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is that of making a recommendation to the City Commission that a waiver be granted to LDR Section 4.1.4(C ) with respect to adjoining lots of record under the same ownership. BACKGROUND The Mannweiler proposal to construct a 2 story single family residence on a vacant lot in Del-Ida Park came before the Board as a pre-application review on September 16, 1998. The Board was informed that the project would require variances; a landscape waiver; and a recommendation to the City Commission that a waiver be granted to LDR Section 4.1.4( C). The Board felt that the project was worthy of the above concessions and recommended that the Mannweilers make formal application for the necessary relief. STAFF.. COMMENTS The subject property consists of Lot 10, Block 1 of the Del-Ida Park subdivision and is located within the Del-Ida Park Historic District in the R-1-AA zoning district. Though the lot does not conform to the current development standards in the R-1-AA zoning district, it is a buildable Lot of Record as it was platted in 1923 before the current standards were required. However, in 1994 LDR Section 4.1,4( C) was adopted pertaining to Adjoining Lots of Record Under the Same Ownership as follows: In residential zoning districts other than R-1-A, if 2 or more adjoining lots of record are under the same ownership at the time of passage or amendment of this ordinance, and if the total frontage and the total area is equal to or greater than that which is required by the zoning district regulations, said property shall not be developed except in accordance with the minimum frontage and lot area requirements of the district. The subject lot, Lot 10, and Lots 8 and 9 to the west were under the same ownership at the time the above ordinance was adopted, therefore Lot 10 requires a waiver to Section 4.1.4( C) to qualify as a buildable lot. The owner of Meeting Date: October 7, 1998 Agenda Item: Ill-A HPB Staff Report COA-361-Waiver Page 2 Lot 10 has requested that this waiver be granted by the City Commission. As the lot is located within an historic district the City Commission requests a recommendation from the HPB before taking action. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the Board's positive direction and comments made at the pre- application review September 16, 1998, recommend to the City Commission that a Waiver to LDR Section 4.1.4( C) be granted. File/u/ww/361-w II I o� ! [ lIIIIHIIHHHIHHIHHHi 2 N.E. LOTH ST. I ► > 0 N ,.1 1 N.E. 9TH ST. N.W. 9TH ST. 11111111IMIE ► Li I I tw > . ' 1 glom 2LI1 o z c 0 N.W. oTH 5T. GEORGE BUSH „1 Z MINNIE BOULEVARD - N < ,1II� - Z Z QV-JIIIII4 j ► N.W. 7TH ST. W Ell II Ili. < I < N.E. 7TH~ ST. � till ,- , I i 1 j ,� . \. z v o� ` 1 1 < ♦ LAKE TERR. N.W. 6TH ST. D �— p_——� �——., N.E. 6TH ST. ♦ S ►o � C �o Pr ` `P I — F•� ` O 0 �� Z Z I O N.E. 5TH TERR. C I rW0OD LANE Z ` f � ♦ 4Li n , KINGS LYNN C I I ` , Z1 I TI ' csJ _J ,�k �_ 0� N.E. 5TH CT. 1 I tfr BEVtRLY DR. ..\ 1 lAi I•S• I I _ �C�� io F </' Z TRINITY Y N.E. 5TH ST. Ic >- L U THERANHil 1 Li vi I 1...1 III Z LAKE E IDA ROAD N.E. 4TH ST. 'v' POST > > I CASON < OFFICE < < METHODIST ► r CHURCH I T 0 I- a 0 C In 2 C ■ I w < < O I- - - w 2 v LJ L.� M' 1 I w (NJW W Z 3 2 Z Z Z— IF Z Z 1 N.W. 3RD ^ST. ^N.E^ ri 7-1 '3RD ST. U 11 N.E. 3RD ST. 1� I I I I 11 I I I 1 1 I I ^I I I I I- N DEL- IDA PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL BLOCK 1 , LOT 10 PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -- O/G/TAL BASE MAP SYSTtM -- MAP REF: LM2B1