Loading...
HPB 02-15-1995 DELt�1:'6EACH ♦ j MATten 93 AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: February 15, 1995 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6 : 00 P.M. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these ' proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286 . 0105 . I . CALL TO ORDER II . APPROVAL OF MINUTES: February -1, 1995 III . PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: None IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: A. COA 8-244 New construction on a vacant parcel located at the southeast corner of N.E. 2nd Avenue and N.E. 5th Street, Del-Ida Part Historic District Tony Keller, owner/applicant. Presented by Everett Jenner, architect/authorized agent. Approve plot plan and elevations for new construction of a duplex. Approve associated landscape plans . V. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS: A. Recommend to the Planning & Zoning Board that a conditional use for a bank in the CBD (Central Business District) Zoning District be approved. The proposed bank will be located at the southwest corner of E.- Atlantic Avenue and Palm Square, Marina Historic District. B. Make a recommendation to the Planning & Zoning Board with respect to a text amendment to LDR section 2 .2 .6 (B) (2) , Special Qualification for Historic Preservation Board membership. VI . REPORTS AND COMMENTS: A. Historic District Representatives B. Board Members C. Staff VI . ADJOURN POSTED ON: February 9, 1995 --/Vt)lea' Patricia Cay , 01storic Preservation Planner MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 1995 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I . ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 6 : 00 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Miller, Charlie Williams, Sandy Jamison, Betty Devitt MEMBERS ABSENT: John Vaughan, Vera Farrington, Julie Morgan STAFF PRESENT: Pat Cayce II . APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The Minutes for the Regular Meeting of February 1, 1995 were before the Board for consideration. Mr. Jamison moved to approve the Minutes as presented. The motion was seconded by Mr. Williams and passed by a vote of 4-0 . III . PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: None IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: A. COA 8-244 : New Construction on a Vacant Parcel Located at the Southeast Corner of N.E. 2nd Avenue and N.E. 5th Street; Del-Ida Park Historic District; Tony Keller, Owner/Applicant; Everett Jenner, Architect/ Authorized Agent. It was moved by Mr. Jamison, seconded by Ms . Devitt and passed 4-0 to approve COA 8-244 based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4 .5 . 1(E) (7) and (8) , and Objective A-4 (Land Use Element) of the Comprehensive Plan, and the following: A. To allow the applicant to exercise the options as stated in the staff report; and, B. To recommend to the City Engineer that the driveways be constructed 10 ' in width rather than the required 12 ' . It was moved by Mr. Jamison, seconded by Ms . Devitt and passed 4-0 to approve COA 8-244 (Landscape Plans) as presented. V. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS: A. Recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Board that a Conditional Use for a Bank in the CBD (Central Business District) Zoning District be Approved. The Proposed Bank will be Located at the Southwest Corner of E. Atlantic Avenue and Palm Square; Marina Historic District. Mr. Jamison stated that he had to abstain from voting as he had a conflict of interest due to his association with Digby Bridges, Architect for the project. This resulted in a lack of quorum. As 4 members of the Palm Square Homeowners Association were present to speak, staff recommended that the Board take the item as discussion only, no vote on a recommendation to the Planing and Zoning Board was taken. Staff informed the visitors that they would be able to comment on the proposal at the public hearing which would be held by the Planning and Zoning Board at their February 27, 1995 meeting. The Palm Square residents were mainly concerned with the additional traffic which the project would bring to the street. They felt that the drive-through window would cause excess vehicular traffic especially with respect to the drive-through exit onto Palm Square at such a close proximity to the corner of E. Atlantic Avenue. Some questioned if a traffic survey had been done. All of the residents and 2 Board members pointed out that many vehicles going east, to avoid Atlantic Avenue traffic, often continue on the east-bound bypass to Palm Square and then turn east on Atlantic Avenue. Suggestions for lessening the traffic impact were as follows : * Recommend that the City create an access roadway from the subject property west to S.E. 7th Avenue; or, * Install a cul-de-sac on Palm Square at the northern boundary of the residential district. Palm Square Homeowners Association Members Present: Alieda Riley, Walter Barnard, Noel Smith, Janet Kennick - 2 - 02/15/95 B. Make a Recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Board with Respect to a Text Amendment to LDR Section 2 .2 .6 (B) (2) , Special Qualifications for Historic Preservation Board Membership. There was no consensus on the wording of the LDR text amendment and the item was tabled. The lack of consensus revolves around the fact that the State requires a Certified Local Government (CLG) to have a professional historic review board to the extent that professionals are willing to serve, with the balance being made up of knowledgeable lay people. The Board feels that professional status should not be a requirement of Historic Preservation Board membership. Staff is consulting with the State CLG coordinator in an attempt to modify the requirements . VI . REPORTS AND COMMENTS: A. Reports from Historic District Representatives None B. Board Members None C. Staff None VII . ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business before the Board, Ms . Devitt moved to adjourn the meeting at 7 : 30 P.M. , seconded by Mr. Williams and passed 4-0 . The undersigned is the Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for February 15, 1995, which were formally adopted and ap � by e Board on March 1, 1995 . iana Mund If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes . They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes . - 3 - 02/15/95 STAFF REPORT HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING FEBRUARY 15, 1995 AGENDA ITEM IV-A COA 8-244 NEW CONSTRUCTION, DUPLEX VACANT LOT, SOUTHEAST CORNER OF N.E. 2ND AVENUE AND N.E. 5TH STREET, DEL-IDA PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT TONY KELLER, OWNER/APPLICANT ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is that of approval of COA 8-244 to allow a 3,310 s. f. duplex to be constructed on Lots 1 and 2 and the west 25 feet of lot 17, Block 7, Del-Ida Park. The parcel is currently vacant and located at the southeast corner of N.E. 2nd Avenue and N.E. 5th Street. BACKGROUND The vacant parcel contains 15,454 s. f and is located in the RL (low density residential) Zoning District. The RL District provides a residential zoning district with flexible densities having a base of three units per acre and a range to six units per acre. The RL District provides for implementation of provisions of Goal Area "C" of the Comprehensive Plan and, more specifically, Policy C-2 . 1 which calls for providing sites for single family detached and low density planned residential development. Duplex structures are a permitted use in the RL District. DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS The project is in compliance with all development standards required by Section 4 .3 .4 of the LDRs for duplex construction in the RL district, with the exception of the driveway widths . The required driveway width is 12 ' and 10 ' wide driveways are proposed. The proposed building contains two 3 bedroom dwelling units . The west unit is 1,596 s. f. and the east unit is 1,714 s . f. Four parking spaces are required for the project and seven are provided. A 3 car parking area is located to the south of the west unit. A detached 2 car garage and a 2 car parking area are provided for the east unit. DESIGN ANALYSIS The proposed 2 story structure is in the "Old Florida Vernacular" style. The dwelling units are side by side, each unit has a second floor. e Staff Report COA 244 Page 2 West Unit (Rental Apartment) The front facade of the west unit faces N.E. 2nd Avenue. A two story bay is proposed south of the front entrance door. The bay has four windows on the first floor and 2 windows on the second floor. A two story porch with a traditional baluster railing extends across the south two thirds of the west elevation. East Unit (Owner's Apartment) The entrance to the east unit faces N.E. 5th Street. A two story porch extends along the north elevation and wraps around the east elevation. A two story, four window bay is proposed south of the chimney on the east facade. A 14 ' breezeway connects the garage to the east apartment. Exterior elements * All windows are to be white factory finished aluminum, single hung with a 6 over one pane configuration. * Wall finish is to be vinyl or cementitious lap siding, owner' s option. * Roof is to be fiber glass shingles or metal, owner's option due to cost consideration. * Front entrance doors are to be wood panel, other doors are to be a combination wood and glass. * Transoms over entrance doors are to be clear glass or stained glass with address numbers inserted, owner's option. * Shutters are to be wood or resin coated polymer. * Colors : white with green shutters or yellow with white trim and green shutters, owner's option. * There is an optional fireplace indicated on the plans for the west unit. If installed the upper and lower windows to the north of the front door (west elevation) would be eliminated. As the openings of this facade are asymmetrically arranged, the installation of the chimney would not interfere with the massing and balance of the elevation. Staff recommends owner' s option. Staff Report COA 244 Page 3 STAFF COMMENTS There are several exterior elements to be left to the owner' s discretion. However, the requested options are well within the guidelines for new construction in historic districts. For example, if the applicant had specified only a fiberglass shingle roof it would be appropriate for the Board to approve it. If the owner can afford to install a metal roof the project will be enhanced dramatically and the applicant will not have to return to the Board for approval. With the exception of exterior color selection, all options are due to cost consideration. The applicant, Tony Keller, is familiar with the goals for our historic districts. He did an excellent job of restoring the two story yellow and white house at 334 N.E. 1st Avenue, which has recently been sold. The proposed cementitious lap siding was utilized on the garage which was constructed in conjunction with that restoration project. If members are not familiar with the lap siding they are encouraged to visit the restored site. The garage is on the east side of the alley west of 334 N.E. 1st Avenue. Historically, a Florida vernacular house would have had a shell rock driveway, or with a more formal yard, cement ribbon strips . Today, shell rock is not permitted and ribbon strips are difficult to maintain due to more vehicular traffic. However, it is appropriate to de-emphasize driveways as much as possible. Staff suggests that a recommendation to the Engineering Department be made to allow the driveways to remain at the proposed 10 ' width rather than the 12 ' width which is required. Positive findings can be made for this project with respect to Section 4 .5 . 1 (E) (7) New construction in historic districts, and (8) Visual compatibility. The Old Florida vernacular style is compatible with Del-Ida Park's varied and eclectic buildings . The two story height and the traditional design will complement the Towers Apartments to the south and create a rhythm along the N.E. 2nd Avenue block. The proposed structure will make a nice transition to the contributing Mission Revival house to the east on N.E. 5th Street. By locating the entrances on different streets a directional expression of front elevation is maintained and strengthens the single family residential character of the immediate neighborhood. ALTERNATIVE ACTION 1 . Continue with direction. 2 . Deny COA 8-244, based on a failure to make positive findings to Section 4 . 5 . 1(E) (7) (8) . 3 . Approve COA 224 , based on positive findings to Section 4 . 5 . 1(E) (7 ) and(8) and Objective A-4 (Land Use Element) of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Report COA 244 Page 4 RECOMMENDED ACTION 1 . Approve COA 224, based on positive findings to Section 4 .5 . 1(E) (7) and(8) , and Objective A-4 (Land Use Element) of the Comprehensive Plan, and A. Allow the applicant to exercise the requested options. B. Recommend to the City Engineer that the driveways be constructed 10 ' in width. file/y:keller r STAFF REPORT HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING FEBRUARY 15, 1995 AGENDA ITEM V-A ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is to recommend to the Planning & Zoning Board that a branch of the Northern Trust Bank be approved as a conditional use in the CBD (Central Business District) Zoning District. The proposed bank will be located on the first floor of a new building to be constructed at the southwest corner of E. Atlantic Avenue and Palm Square, Marina Historic District. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL The bank building will be located on a vacant parcel which once housed the Patio Restaurant. See the attached elevations and site plan for explanation. The portion of the site facing E. Atlantic Avenue is in the CBD (Central Business District) Zoning District. The rear of the property, location of the parking area, is zoned CF (Community Facility) . Banks are allowed only as a conditional use in the Central Business District. When a conditional use request falls within an historic district it is reviewed by the HPB with a recommendation to the P&Z Board who then recommends to the City Commission that the use be approved or denied. -If the -conditional use is approved by the City Commission, the project will be reviewed by the HPB through the Site Plan and COA review process . REVIEW BY OTHERS This project is being reviewed by the CRA (Community Redevelopment Agency) , their comments will be available at the meeting. A courtesy notice is being sent to the Palm Square Home Owners Association representative, comments will be available at the meeting. RECOMMENDED ACTION The Planning Department is recommending approval . file/y:con-bank • • • IEXIST. (2) STORY EXIST. BUILDING --CURB ICBS WALL • I 131.80' N _ — EXIST. COVERED STORAGE 7.10 � A •,c �n J fJJ/fJ/ m,••y'Z f. PLANTERS AREA 'j 69YnnR :EXIST. WIRE EXIST. I '•'+'•'•-•''IT -' yYi�S� ``+''• EXIST. FENCE CBS WALL 4 : . 1HC j��� �}� PAVERS / NEW 6' HIGH POLE I ANCHOR o 7 6I •�,� - 48'0" � `, ;>: N 1 CBS WALL--A I r in I I /o - -- -• / JJ ;,• - ;�— - - -� 4 —.Or-- — — b I / COVE ED PARKING :/ I ��� ;;:R$ .1., _1-40 � NEW o p t,P♦, .��_... Y _.* �'\ .N D ►s.♦� . 7 4 =♦�♦� Z• a LINE OF ROOF ����� S DUMPSTER r' t♦�♦� p y ABOVE / ,\ EXIST. LIGHT (` i PROPOSED ' POLE v w 2-JIutY ••i, ` I, Zj BUILDING 14,•� p' L i� ^ �'1.- • ►* .' NEW n 5 h i Mk PAVERS 10'0' 24'0' 16'0' 6'0' 24'0' T0" 40'0 7 0` 20 0 $'0' 10'0"• ♦,♦,. 1 0 180" t, I �. 3 1r DRIVE 1HROUGH/ \i i>• �� EXIST. �A3 Ci o :,i -`�' WINDOW % \♦♦" t PAVERS (t SIDEWALK t%%%%%%%%%.. i 194'T } A I • L♦\i\♦\i�i�i 'Z f•:•••f.. ////,/ / y 4 C6IA( �jI I I I 41 Ill iiiii1111 . I 2" J �� 1 COVERED PARKING : '.— MeZ L\%♦tT♦t%♦t♦l •t♦y% `` 36 0' 10'0"_ 24'0"� 6'0' I 68'0' C. �' �i�i�i4�Z����♦����������, �,�. ,� ——�—_ �. ♦,z, ♦\ sus CNEW 6'BS WALL 4cO ///^ANCHOR 6 // POLE �1HC _..•'. $$%i$%$$$$$$$$$i$i$$i$$$$$$i\i $,$$$$`7" ON CORNER T I , — — . -- O o'w., O • j y i$ni%I'+t Pgibil f Ig:si:A l ,.r\ 1 q` _ _ _ _ r v c EXIST. o `POL 258.60' • !'. . . . ? �9‘)�i0 iFi+i i1l � 's) CURB & GUTTER N CONC. Y + o I SIDEALK w -------------------------1 -- --- ------ ------------ I I • • MIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMI Ise _..4 . . „, .,..:::::,a ,,,, • AM NUM- __ /./\,,,\,.,. CLAY'S' TILE ROOF RAM NORTHERN TRUST BAIL II BANC � _ IMP s" u u u U U u li li tT DECO INK' I II 1 u .... ..�. .... ... ... .. 8 nmg .. .. .... ..�. �.� ..�. .... ... i .. �I 1 .... N... C .... .... ULU U II sIMUL MI iiIrd ���� ..�.. ■.J■ U.. sTaNl ►��I Ig 111 LIg 111 I11�1►.,a 1 I �I�r�-/���1�1\ �� --1-- -..:-- --s-- Ifi.i.iiii .iii .iail li ,� , - --°- ii - T;s;s T ,m `u ,� ,� iiiiiiiiiiivi I CAST ������•��,�� ��i��,�i"1,1 1,/1,1'�,►it BALLK -•- . SIMUL Iil 1 ...• .,,. ...� �.,. ��; �.�.. ..;I..• �•..�.. ... ' STONE ■ ..■ ■.,.� ■;■ ■■■ ■�.. ..■■ .... : ..1� ..iu i ii iIghtL ! : ■a.i C... ■..■ '; ■.■ .;■ ■..l ; l... ■... .... , ■.,.1 ...m EMI 11 suit., r; .UN. ..;.. ...i., ..�.l i.�.�_..U�. .:.... .1;. ..:. ..J Jul' ..■ NORTH ELEVATION , i• /49T 'UT/G' �}l/cg • • • • 7--- /\ - \ iv ..._.MM/1i/4�1./MI LJJe . 1 7t111 i• _ imis • Il „ii4�A4M /iV�i4Wyii Mr i'T:I�ylpll��l isifi}ii3� , i%I-;oM__A+1 iI� MA1... l%"L\ il,�i'�'iI�illi'i1�7i1 ���'li�`li►1' fI t-1 If EAST ELEVATION • ���4f .5741 • I i _/_ -_ C F A..AilIIelii;•� �/ 1�_�i=�=' il . 11 r,■■ f,Y,;�,,�,� A Ts "" o rr rr"r' 0 lrrr�1�i� ��� _ � Z i �i i�, ��1�TsTr0,4''''1-.►�►��� r fO--- Arr,rr rr',r 1 ,��� �.11,•111/1111111"�-�. 1 1 1 1 T !1!111!1►e== U I r rr:r■ 1.1 � 14� ., 1111 1������ � �'6,1 1j1j1j1j1j1 1,/,1,1,/,/,1,.�� is 1 iriaei 1 T 1 1 1 S ��1 1��1 ����;����;� �� � � ! �A,�1�,���1�1�1 I�I���III�I�,�,I,tle �v1 1 � 1 1r1 � 1E i���� - i � 1 �1 11T11 1�111,1� - 1 1 � 1� 1 1��.11,1, .mi � 1� 1 � 111 �11 � 1... I I �`,� �1 1 ���51i _. � . e � ll�i��r i 1/1 1 1 1 � �����•1 1 1 1 1 .`,i 1 � 1171�i 1 1 1 1,1,1 .�11��'1.�_. _ i rrr V rrr■ rrrr u°rr rr,rr' ii;;ii ii''i ■■,■ IIII r rO r.,.rr ■� m WO Cr„rr C'�';,rr ■'�ar'� me is SOUTH ELEVATION v;=�.-o- W ! ( r - z ,..• ..., 2ND S�r— p p Oral o o J — DRIVE 1 CD CDN.E 1ST LET. Q w I 1— F— if, z 4 0 . 0 : a IL! LOWRY �-� i-1S7—.--, ,— il ST. � '#q•s. • 4. z zd VETERANS �G PARK W _p1� w _, �v o yd _,. vi —LA P v.. m a iNTflimwi ATLANTIC /l AVENUE 1 1.:. = .*_____,I Hn ---^ MIN ill=so, ,MIME —1 a II Q ali . o 1ST • S7. �1 ii U /Y ( H i J Eli IIII Ct Vi • 2ND ` ST. INCRAHAM AV M1 t �.NAS II_ 7 !Irm .... I • to: . . N • PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FL • NORTHERN TRUST BANK • -- LvcIrAL BASE LIAP S rs MA -- MEMORANDUM MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 1995 AGENDA ITEM: V-B SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMBERSHIP. LDR REFERENCE: SECTION 2 .2 .6(B) (2) . This item came before the Board at its meeting of January 18, 1995. It was suggested that revisions to the language of the proposed text amendment be made with respect to the appointment of historic district property owners to the Board. The following text incorporates the suggested revision and is compatible to the qualifications set forth by the Florida Certified Local Government (CLG) historic review boards. To the extent that they apply, the City Commission shall appoint professional members from the disciplines of architecture, landscape architecture, history, architectural history, licensed contractor familiar with restoration, planning, archaeology, or other historic preservation related disciplines such as design, urban planning, American studies, American civilization, or cultural geography. Lay persons of knowledge, experience and judgement who have an interest in historic preservation shall make up the balance of the Board, in the event that there are not enough professionals who apply. Preference should be given to professional and lay persons who own property within historic districts or whose property is individually listed on the Local Register of Historic Places. RECOMMENDED ACTION Recommend to the Planning & Zoning Board that the above text amendment be recommended to the City Commission for a modification to the City' s Land Development Regulations, Section 2 .2 . 6 (B) (2) . file/y:hpbtext3