The URL can be used to link to this page

HPB 03-16-1994 CE:.4Y BEACH WAMNiCal AGENDA 1993 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: March 16, 1994 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: 1st Floor Conference Room Time: 6 : 00 P.M. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286 .0105 . I . CALL TO ORDER II . APPROVAL OF MINUTES: February 16, 1994, March 2, 1994 . III . PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: None. IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. COA 8-215, Sloan Hammock, 106-114 S.E. 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District. Daniel Sloan, Agent. Design approval for the Sloan Hammock Rental Complex. B. COA 8-221, 1027 Nassau Street, Nassau Park Historic District. Stephen and Theresa Groth, Owners. Roy Simon, Architect/Agent. Addition to a single family residence. V. DISCUSSION A. Workshop for an addition to the Chapman Optical Building, 103 N.E. 4th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District. Contributing Building. VI . REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Reports from Historic District Representatives B. Board Members C. Staff VII . ADJOURN POSTED ON cLIe. /73 Pat Cayce, HiS�o c Preservation Planner MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD PUBLIC HEARING WEDNESDAY, MARCH 16, 1994 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM 100 N.W. 1ST AVENUE DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444 I . ROLL CALL: The Chairman called the meeting to order at 6 :00 P.M. Board Members: Christine Bull Present Daniel Carter (Chairman) Present Sandy Jamison (2nd Vice-Chairman) Present Buck Miller (Vice-Chairman) Present Margie Miller Present (arrived 6 :20) John Vaughan Absent Charlie Williams Present Staff Members Present: Jeff Costello, Planning & Zoning Department Diana Mund, Planning & Zoning Department II . APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Buck Miller moved for approval of the minutes for the February 16, 1994 and March 2, 1994 meeting, seconded by Sandy Jamison. The vote was as follows : Christine Bull - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - Yes; Charlie Williams - Yes. Said motion passed 5-0. III . PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: None. IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: The Board moved to hear Item IV.B. COA 8-221 before Item IV.A. COA 8-215 . B. COA 8-221: 1027 Nassau Street; Nassau Park Historic District; Stephen & Theresa Groth, Owners; Roy Simon, Architect/Agent. The action requested of the Board is that of granting approval for COA 8-221 to allow an addition to be constructed on a contributing single family home. The Board approved COA 8-221 as presented based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4 .5. 1(E) (7) . Sandy Jamison moved for approval of COA 8-221, seconded by Christine Bull. The vote was as follows: Christine Bull - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - Yes; Charlie Williams - Yes . Said motion passed 5-0. At this point on the agenda, Ms. Miller arrived at the meeting. A. COA 8-215: Sloan Hammock; 106-114 S.E. 7th Avenue; Marina Historic District; Daniel Sloan, Agent. On October 6, 1993 the Historic Preservation Board gave partial approval for the architectural design elements of COA 8-215 (Sloan Hammock Rental Project) . The applicant was asked to redesign some portions of the project so that positive findings could be made with respect to Section 4 .5. 1. (E) , Visual Compatibility Within Historic Districts. The action requested of the Board was that of granting approval for the remaining design elements associated with the project. Because of the scope of the project and the intensity of use on the site each element required a separate vote. HAMMOCK HOUSE (TRIPLEX ADDITION) * Option #1. (Roof Height) Sandy Jamison moved to approve Option #1 but as no second was forthcoming the motion was invalid. * Option #2 . (Roof Height) The Board could not approve Option #2 as presented as the vote was tied. Margie Miller moved to approval of COA 8-215 (Option #2) as presented, seconded by Charlie Williams. The vote was as follows: Christine Bull - No; Daniel Carter - No; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - No; Margie Miller - Yes; Charlie Williams - Yes. Said motion tied 3-3. The Board moved to return to the Hammock House after hearing the other design elements for this project. - 2 - 3/16/94 * Elevation A (Street (East) Facade) By making positive findings with respect to Section 4 .5.2(E) the Board approved Elevation A as presented for the street facade. Margie Miller moved for approval of COA 8-215 (Hammock House Aesthetic Composition) as presented, seconded by Sandy Jamison. The vote was as follows: Christine Bull - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - Yes; Margie Miller - Yes; Charlie Williams - Yes. Said motion passed 6-0. GARAGE, NEW CONSTRUCTION The Board made positive findings with respect to Section 4 .5. 1(E) and approved the garage as presented in Elevation R. Sandy Jamison moved for approval of COA 8-215 (Garage Elevation Changes) , seconded by Buck Miller. The vote was as follows: Christine Bull - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - Yes; Margie Miller - Yes; Charlie Williams - Yes. Said motion passed 6-0. HISTORIC HOUSE, FRONT FACADE The Board made positive findings with respect to Section 4 .5 . 1(E) and approved Elevation U for the historic house. Charlie Williams moved for approval of COA 8-215 (Historic Residence Street Facade) , seconded by Sandy Jamison. The vote was as follows: Christine Bull - No; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - Yes; Margie Miller - Yes; Charlie Williams - Yes. Said motion passed 5-1. FENCE AND GATE, S.E. 7TH AVENUE The Board approved Elevation Y for the fence, wall and gates based upon positive findings with respect to Section 4 .5. 1(E) . Buck Miller moved for approval of COA 8-215 (Fence & Gate) , seconded by Charlie Williams. The vote was as follows: Christine Bull - No; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - Yes; Margie Miller - Yes; Charlie Williams - Yes. Said motion passed 5-1. - 3 - 3/16/94 WALKWAYS WITHIN THE SITE The Board believed that the pressure treated wood walkways proposed by the applicant were inappropriate to the project. By making positive findings with respect to Section 4 .5 . 1(E) , the Board approved the use of 2 'x 2 ' or 18" x 18" simulated keystone pavers with 4" of grass between the pavers for all walkways within the site. Sandy Jamison moved for approval of COA 8-215 (Walkways) , seconded by Margie Miller. The vote was as follows: Christine Bull - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - Yes; Margie Miller - Yes; Charlie Williams - Yes. Said motion passed 6-0. PAINT COLOR AND MATERIAL The Board made positive findings with respect to Section 4 .5. 1(E) and approved the Color and Material Specification Schedule as presented which was revised on 1/1/94. The schedule indicates that yellow aluminum siding, white aluminum windows and white trim are to be used for the Hammock House exterior. The Historic House and the garage are to have a stucco finish painted the same shade of yellow as the aluminum siding; all trim is to be white. The P&C Cottage will have white aluminum siding with white trim and white aluminum windows. All exterior doors for the project will be M.A.B. Cajun Blue. The fence, wall and gates are to be painted white. Buck Miller moved for approval of COA 8-215 (Color & Specification Schedule) , seconded by Christine Bull. The vote was as follows: Christine Bull - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - Yes; Margie Miller - Yes; Charlie Williams - Yes. Said motion passed 6-0. The Board then returned to the Hammock House. HAMMOCK HOUSE (TRIPLEX ADDITION) After some discussion the Board concluded that with the following modifications to the roof line of Option #2, positive findings with respect to Section 4 .5. 1(E) could be made. The second story of the east and west dwelling units be lowered from 8 ' to 7 ' 6" and the center unit be lowered from a total height of 35 ' to 32 ' 6", and that the cupola be removed. - 4 - 3/16/94 Buck Miller moved for approval of the Hammock House Option #2 with the above conditions, seconded by Christine Bull. The vote was as follows: Christine Bull - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - No; Buck Miller - Yes; Margie Miller - Yes; Charlie Williams - Yes. Said motion passed 5-1. The applicant objected to the Board's decision with respect to the roof line treatment for the Hammock House and expressed his desire to appeal the decision to the City Commission. CONDITION IMPOSED The Board made the following a condition to the all of the above approvals: * That the sealed architectural plans and elevations which are required by the Building Department conform in every respect to the plans approved with COA 8-215. V. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS: A. Chapman Optical Building; 103 N.E. 4th Street; Del-Ida Park Historic District; Dr. Clyde Chapman, Owner; Steve Myott, Agent. A workshop was held on this item. Mr. James Chapman and Mr. Steve Myott were present at the workshop. After discussing Mr. Chapman's drawings which were included in the Board's packets the members had the following comments: * The flat roof of the addition is incompatible with the existing gables on the historic house. * The showroom creates a commercialization of the front facade which is not consistent with the RO zoning district. * Could the showroom be located to the rear of the building? The Board recommend that the applicant revise the plans and return for a workshop session at the Historic Preservation Board Meeting of April 6, 1994 . - 5 - 3/16/94 VI . REPORTS AND COMMENTS : A. Reports from Historic District Representatives None. B. Board Members None. C. Staff None. VII . ADJOURNMENT: Sandy Jamison moved for adjournment at 7 : 50 P.M. , seconded by Buck Miller. The vote was as follows : Christine Bull - Yes ; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - Yes; Margie Miller - Yes; Charlie Williams - Yes . Said motion passed 6-0 . The next meeting is scheduled for April 6 , 1994 . The undersigned is the Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for March 16 , 1994 , which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on May 4 , 1994 . Diana Mund If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes . They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes . - 6 - 3/16/94 E STAFF REPORT HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING MARCH 16, 1994 AGENDA ITEM IV-A COA8-215 SLOAN HAMMOCK RENTAL COMPLEX 106-114 S.E. 7TH AVENUE MARINA HISTORIC DISTRICT ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is that of granting approval for COA 8-215 for exterior design elements for the Sloan Hammock Rental Complex. BACKGROUND This project came to the Board on October 6, 1993 for Site Plan approval, Variances, Waivers and COA approval . Please see the attached findings for the action taken at that meeting. The Board requested that the applicant return for a workshop session before formal submission of the revised COA. The workshop session was held on February 16, 1994 . Revised plans based on the Board's comments at the workshop, were received on February 22, 1994 and are attached to this report. REVISIONS TO THE DESIGN ELEMENTS The revised plans are dated February 22, 1994 and are attached. Additionally, the applicant has submitted the attached letter which documents the changes made as a result of the workshop secession. The revised plans generally conform with the workshop recommendations . If you feel there are areas of major discrepancy please make a note of them for discussion at the meeting. The Building Department will require plans and elevations which have been signed and sealed by a registered architect before a building permit can be issued. Additionally, if the sealed plans do not conform to the plans approved with this COA the building permit will not be issued. ALTERNATIVE ACTION 1 . Approve COA 8-215 with plans revised on February 22, 1994, based on positive findings to Section 4 .5 . 1(E) , with the following condition: That the sealed architectural plans conform to the plans approved with COA 8-215 2 . Deny COA 8-215 based on a failing to make positive findings to Section 4 .5. 1(E) RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Approve COA 8-215 with plans revised on February 22, 1994, based on positive findings to Section 4 .5 . 1(E) , with the following condition: That the sealed architectural plans conform to the plans approved with COA 8-215 MEMORANDUM TO: DAVID J. KOVACS, DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND BONING FROM: JEFFREY A. COSTELLO ii PLANNER RE: SLOAN HAMMOCK - HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD ACTION OF OCTOBER 6, 1993 DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1993 At its meeting of October 6, 1993, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed the development proposal for Sloan Hammock, a multi-family development, located on the west side of SE 7th Avenue, south of SE 1st Street, and took the following actions: Variances A. Approved a variance request to LDR Section 4.3.4(K) (Development Matrix) (7-0) , to reduce the required side yard setback from 15' to 10' for a proposed 3 car garage. The Board approved the variance based upon positive findings with Section 4.5. 1(J) , that a variance is necessary to maintain the historic character demonstrating and that it would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare. B. Approved a variance request to LDR Section 4.3.4(K) (Development Matrix) (6-1, Buck Miller dissenting) , to reduce the required rear yard setback from 25' to 13'8" for the garage. (Actual garage to be 17' from rear with overhang and columns extending to within 13'8". The Board approved the variance based upon positive findings with Section 4.5.1(J) , that literal interpretation of the provisions of the existing ordinances would alter the historic character of the historic district or historic site to such an extent that it would not be feasible to preserve the historic character (related to distance between the garage and the historic house--need reduced rear setback to maintain appropriate distance between the structures) . C. Approved a variance request to LDR Section 4.6.2 (Distance Between Residential Buildings) (7-0) , to reduce the distance between two residential buildings within multiple family developments from 24 ' to 18.5' , in that there is an open first floor area that allows additional air circulation. The Board approved the variance based upon positive findings with Section 4.5.1(J) . To: DJK Re: Sloan Page 2 Waivers D. Approved the waiver request from LDR Section 5.3. 1 (7-0) to reduce the right-of-way width from 60' - 40 ' . E. Regarding the sidewalk waiver, the Board voted (6-1, Buck Miller dissenting) , to require that the sidewalk be installed along the west side of S.E. 7th Avenue from the north property line to the northernmost parking space. The request to waive the installation of the balance of the sidewalk (to the south property line) was denied, however, the Board agreed to allow payment for the costs of the improvement in lieu of the actual sidewalk construction. Site Plan The Board considered three alternative parking configurations during its review of the site plan. Alternative #1 adds 6 ' of asphalt to the west side of the parking spaces to accommodate all parking on the site and out of the right-of-way. A landscape island is provided in the middle of the spaces. Alternative #2 provides 5 parallel parking spaces on site within the existing asphalt area, and places 5 spaces off of the alley (backing out) . Alternative #3 involves the relocation of 3 of the existing backout spaces to the rear off of the alley, and the addition of 6' of asphalt to the west side of the remaining parking spaces, in order to remove them from the right-of-way. With respect to Alternative #2, the Board felt that because it would require the relocation of 5 spaces to the rear of the site, the buffering between this property and the commercial property to the west would be insufficient. Similarly, the Board felt that although Alternative #3 would relocate fewer (3) spaces to the rear and would remove some parking and asphalt area along 7th Avenue, it would also require an extensive amount of buffering to be removed between the residences and the commercial area to the west. As the backout parking is existing, they felt it was not detrimental to the site to allow it to remain, and therefore supported Alternative #1. F. The Board approved the site plan (COA 8-215) for Sloan Hammock (7-0) subject to the following conditions: 1. That a recorded Unity of Title be submitted to the Planning Department prior to issuance of a building permit submittal. 2. That parking Alternative #1 be approved, and that a revised site plan and landscape plan be submitted showing the new configuration. • To: DJK Re: Sloan Page 3 3. That a landscape island be provided between the parking spaces along S.E. 7th Avenue to break up the asphalt. 4. That the proposed fence along the east property line be relocated further to the west in order to provide a landscaped area between the fence and backout parking area. 5. That the Technical Items listed below be addressed with the revised submission: * Provide one handicap parking space and ramp with required signing and striping. * Relocate the scooter and bike parking elsewhere on the site, and provide a landscape island in this area. * Provide the location of the nearest fire hydrant with a dimension to the site. * Provide a typical parking lot striping detail on the plans. G. Approved the landscape plan for Sloan Hammock (7-0) with the condition that the proposed shrubs in the islands adjacent to the backout parking area be a minimum of 6 ' from the end of the landscape islands. H. Approved COA 8-215 for Sloan Hammock (7-0) with the following conditions: HAMMOCK HOUSE The applicant will return to the HPB with revised plans for: * The center window opening on the east facade • * Some method of reducing the scale and massing of the roof. The board's suggestions were to lower the center unit's roof; remove the third story by removing the widow's walk and cupola. * The main paint color has been changed and the applicant will submit samples available in the vinyl siding. GARAGE Applicant will submit front elevation (west) to reflect the 3'4" arcade which was specified in the variance. • To: DJK Re: Sloan Page 4 HISTORIC RESIDENCE Applicant will return with revised plans for the front entrance porch; window enclosures for the front porch; front door and front screen door. OTHER ITEMS Applicant will submit plans for an alternative to the picket fence in front of the historic house; and for an alternative to the proposed wood walkways which are used throughout the project. VARIANCE TO SIDE SETBACK. Positive findings to 4 .5 . 1(J) (1) Side Setback (a) (b) (c) (d) Felt this was the minimum necessary, not to build the garage, but to maintain the the open space within the development. Board was swayed by the fact that the owner of the property to the north, the most impacted by the setback, gave written approval for the reduction. Rear Setback Positive findings to 4 .5 . 1(J) (1) (a) (b) (c) Positive findings to 4 .5. 1(J) (2) Appropriate adaptive reuse (a) (b) Board recognized that the garage was desirable and could not be built without a variance without having some part of the contributing house demolished. Board felt the arched arcade was an interesting design element and that the 3 ' roof would provide shelter from the rain(???) for a person opening the garage door. Variance was reduced from the requested 10 ' to 13 ' 4", with the west wall of the garage to be constructed 17 ' from the rear property line. Positive findings to 4 . 6 .2 (a) (b) (c) (d) There was some concern about the fact that the second floor wall extends over the porch but after discussion positive . findings were made. Hammock Partners • . • ••••• •. • • • • • • .• . . . • • • •. • • e. •• • •• • • Property Management & Investment `v,is I February 21, 1994 DEc •:.,1 Ms.Pat Cayce,historic preservation planner FEB 22 ` CITY OF DELRAY BEACH 100 NW 1st Ave U Delray Beach,Fl. PLANNING & ZONIN RE;SLOAN HAMMOCK C.O.A.8-215 additional aesthetic revisions requested by Historic Preservation Board Dear Pat: As a result of the comments made by the Historic Preservation Board at the Workshop on 2/16,/94 we have submitted the following additional Drawings/Options 1. HAMMOCK HOUSE;SIZE AND MASSING OF CENTRAL ROOF ELEMENTS • ' • A.OPTION#1 (HAMMOCK HOUSE ELEVATIONS OPTION#1 A,B,C,D REVISED 2/20/'94); we have lowered the top of the cupola from 35'to 32'6"and the F.F.L.of the Widows Walk from 25'4"to 22'8",We reduced the 2nd floor ceiling height in the front and back of the two end dwelling units from 8'0"to 7'6"(the lowest we can make it)so that the 2nd floor plate height is reduced form 17'4"to 16'10". We prefer this option to Option #2. B.OPTION#2(HAMMOCK HOUSE ELEVATIONS OPTION#2 A,B,C,D REVISED 2/17/94); we have maintained the same sizes and heights of all elements but we have deleted the cupola entirely. 1.1 HAMMOCK HOUSE AESTHETIC COMPOSITION OF ELEV.'A'(window placement/size) A.Elevation"A"(if Hammock House;placement of windows,etc.We have revised this elevation as per the attached drawings, and the board seemed to be satisfied with its design. 2. GARAGE ELEVATION CHANCES MADE DUE TO VARIANCE APPROVAL A.Ggcage Elevation'R"(REVISED 1/1/94)We submitted a revised North Elevation of the Garage showing a reduced roof'Portico"per the approved setback variance. The board seemed to be satisfied with its design. r • _ 3.HISTORIC RESIDENCE STREET FACADE(Design of Roof over Entry Stoop) A.Front Elevation"U"(REVISED 1/1/94), We previously provided enlarged elevat' c of the existing appearance, and (2) alternate option for the entry'roof desi M gn. The board seemed to be satisfied with both designs, but favored Option #1. • ' - .. 4. OTHER DESIGN ELEMENTS: A.Fence and Gate-'f or the portion located on Lot 1(fronting historic residence)(REVISED 2//17/94) We have attached a revised drawing for the North Entry Gate-Elevation"Y"showing a stucco finished wall and a revised wood gate design. The board seemed to be satisfied with its design, but requested that matching columns be added at the extreme s. property line and at the terminating ends of the Stucco_wall. Additionally we have "wrapped the ends of the wall back 33.5' on the north and 8' on the south side (@ jog in fence).We have attached a new drawing showing the Fence/Walls in plan view(REVISED 2/17/94). • 7.8 LA R`I 'AT� CIRCLE ,. BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33487 (407) 241 - 55 ) 1 Hammack Partners . . . . . .. . . . . ..•. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . Property Management & Investment LETTER TO PAT CAYCE 2/21/94 PAGE 2 OF 2 • RE;SLOAN HAMMOCK C.O.A.8-215 • additional aesthetic revisions requested by Historic Preservation Board 4.OTHER DESIGN ELEMENTS (Continued) B.Walkways: we proposed to change the walkway to the front of the Historic Residence to two rows of 18"x 18"or 2'x2'Sun.Keystone pavers with 4"of grass between them.The balance of the Walkways would remain a natural PT boards on grade.The majority of the board seemed to be satisfied with this modification. C.Color&Material Specification Scheduel(REVISED 1/1/94) As per the Boards suggestions we have changed peach to Yellow on certain areas of siding and stucco. _.__.The board see a tc_s_ i d_with.t Fig Cu(�Laelectians. ' If you have any questions or comments,please feel free to contact me. • . ' Please put us on the next available Meeting.Date of the Historic Preservation Board.Thank you SincerelyH72 DTT 1 I; ' ;! � vJ � Utz Ir Daniel Sloan, Agent for Hammock Partners and Historic Partners,Owners FEB 22 T - • PLANNING & ZONING • • • • • • • • r - 78 LARIAT CIRCLE BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33487 (407) 241 - 5597 Ch. 92-I6t LAWS OF FLORIDA Cb.92-169 (13) The Department of State shall adopt rules as provided in chapter 120 for the implementation of this section.These rules must specify►the criteria for deter- mining whether• property is eligible for exemption;guidelines to determine im- CHAPTER 92-159 provements to historic properties which qualify the property for an exemption; criteria for the review of applications for exemptions;procedures for the cancella- tion of exemptions for violations to the agreement required by subsection(7);the manner in which local historic preservation offices may be certified as qualified to review applications;and other requirements necessary to implement this section. An act relating to ad valorem tax exemptions;creating P. 196.1997,F.S.;pro- Section 2. Section 196.1998,Florida Statutes,is created to read: viding that the board of county commissioners of any county or the gov- erning authority of any municipality may adopt an ordinance to grant ad 196.1998 Additional ad valorem tax exemptions for historic properties open to valorem tax exemptions under e.3,Art.VII of the State Constitution for the public.— improvement*to historic properties which are a result of the restoration, renovation,or rehabilitation of those properties;specifying requirements (1) If an improvement qualifies a historic property for an exemption under a. for ordinances granting exemptions;providing procedures for application is regularly 97.and the property is used for non-profit or governmental purposes and for an the property owner to covenant to maintain is regularly and frequently open for the public's visitation,use.and benefit,the for character of exemption;requiring property during exemption period and providing board of county commissioners or the governing authority of.the municipality by for assessment of previously 3xemp thed taxes upon violation of the cove- ordinance may authorize the exemption from ad valorem taxation of up to 100 per- nant;establishing qualifications for applicants to be approved for an ex- tent of the assessed value of the property, as improved, any provision of a. emptioo;requiring property appraisers to provide certain information to 196.1997(2)to the contrary notwithstanding,if all other provisions of that section the local wing authorities;providing duties of the Division of Histor- are complied with;provided,however,that the assessed value of the improvement Ida Resources of the Department of State or local historic preservation must be equal to at least 50% of the total assessed value of the property as im- offices;requiring the Department of State to adopt certain rules;creating proved.The exemption applies only to real property to which improvements ars s.196.1998,F.B.;providing additional ad valorem tax exemptions for his- made by or for the use of the existing owner. In order for the property to qualify torte properties open to the public;providing for additional rules;provid- for the exemption provided in this section,any such improvements must be made teg a contingent effective date. on or after the day the ordinance granting the exemption is adopted. (2) In addition to meeting the criteria established in rules adopted by the De- Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: pertment of State under s.196.1997,a historic property is qualified for an exemp- ya,1. Beetles 196.1997,Florida Statutes,is created to read tion under this section if the Division of Historical Resources,or the loll historic preservation office,whichever is applicable,determines that the property meets 196.1997 Ad valorem tax exemptions for historic properties.— the criteria established in rules adopted by the Department of State under this sec- (1) The boardof county commissioners of any county or the governing author' lion. ty of auyl ►municirjitY may adopt an ordinance to allow ad valorem tax exemption. (3) In addition to the authority granted to the Department of State to adopt under s.3,Art.VII of the State Constitution to historic properties if the ooze' rules under s. 196.1997,the Department of State shall adopt rules as provided in are engaging in the restoration,rehabilitation,or renovation of such properties' chapter 120 for the implementation of this section,which shall include criteria for accordance with guidelines established in this section. determining whether a property is qualified for the exemption authorized by this (2) 'Theme of county commissioners or the governing authority of the m4+ section,and other rules necessary to implement thii section. nicipality by ordinance may authorize the exemption from ad valorem taxation' Section 3. This act shall take effect on the effective data of an amendment to up to 100 percent of the assessed value of all improvements to historic propertir the State Constitution approved by the electors at the general election to be held which result from the restoration,renovation,or rehabilitation of such In order propertie: in November 1992 which authorizes the governing authority of any county or mu- The exemption applies only to improvements to real property. nicipality to grant ad valorem tax exemptions for rehabilitation or renovation of property to uality►for the exemption,any such improvements must be made(' historic properties. or after thi day the ordinance authorizing ad valorem tax exemption for histor properties is adopted. Became•law without the Governor's approval Apri19,1992 (3) The ordinance shall designate the type and location of historic property f, Filed in Office Secretary of State April 8, 1991 which exemptions may be granted,which may include any property meeting t i provisions of subsection(11),which property may be further required to be local: within a particular geographic area or areas of the county or municipality. (4) The ordinance must specify that such exemptions shall apply only to tax, laid by the unit of government granting the exemption.The exemptions do r 4 1 are additions. CODING: Words Neither*are deletions;words imdarllnad ON additions. CODING:Words elriehen are deletions;words underlined Ch.92-159 LAWS OF FLORIDA Cb.92-159 Ch.944.59 LAWS OF FLORIDA Cb.92-159 apply,however,to taxes levied for the payment of bonds or to taxes authorised by or's Standards for Rehabilitation and will be made in accordance with guidelines a vote of the electors pursuant to r.9(b)ors.12,Art.VII of the State Constitution. developed by the Department of State. (5) The ordinance must specify that any exemption granted remains in effect (e) Other information deemed necessary by the Department of State. for up to 10 years with respect to any particular property,regardless of any change (9) The board of county commissioners or the governing authority of the mu- in the authority of the county or municipality to grant such exemptions or any nicipality shall deliver a copy of each application for a historic preservation ad vet- change in ownership of the property. In order to retain the exemption,however. lorem tax exemption to the property appraiser of the county. Upon certification the historic character of the property,and improvements which qualified the prop- of the assessment roll,or recertification, if applicable,pursuant to a. 193.122,for erty for an exemption,must be maintained over the period for which the exemp- each fiscal year during which the ordinance is in effect,the property appraiser shall tion is granted. report the following information to the local governing body: (6) The ordinance shall designate either a local historic preservation office of (a) The total taxable value of all property within the county or municipality the Division of Historical Resources of the Department of State to review apples- for the current fiscal year. • tions for exemptions.The local historic preservation office or the division,which- (b) The total value of all in the county or municipality ever is applicable,must recommend that the board of county commissioners or the which has been approved exemptedto receivelue historicllproperty preservation ad valoremyo tax governingauthority of the municipality grant or deny the exemption.Such reviews tion for the current fiscal year• exemp- must be conducted in accordance with rules adopted by the Department of State. The recommendation,and the reasons therefor,must be provided to the applicant (10) A majority vote of the board of county commissioners of the county or of and to the governing entity before consideration of the application at an official the governing authority of the municipality shall be required to approve a written meeting of the governing entity. For the purposes of this section, local historic application for exemption.Such exemption shall take effect on the January 1 fol• preservation offices must be approved and certified by the Department of State. lowing substantial completion of the improvement:The board u1 courtly exemption, commis- the property owner must enter into a covenant swiiers orgoverning authority of a municipality shall include the following in (a) qualify for an the resolution or ordinance approving the written application for exemption: or agreement with the governing body for the term for which the exemption is The name of the owner and the address of the historic property for whichgranted.The form of the covenant or agreement must be established by the De- (a) partment of State and must require that the character of the property, and the the efiemptlon is granted. qualifying improvements to the property,be maintained during the period that the (b) The period of time for which the exemption will remain in effect and the exemption is granted.The covenanter e�reement shall be bindinf on the current expiration date of the exemption. covenant o agreement transferees,and their iiero e y successors,b nor assigniub)es.Vto theipa of thepayment (c) A finding that the historic property meets the requirements of this section orcovenant agreement rpbulteinZFie property Owrrerbiioi iubjeCt to payment of the differences between the total amount of taxes which would have been due (11) Property i•qualified for an exemption under this section if: in March in each of the previous years in which the covenant or agreement was in effect had the property not received the exemption and the total amount of taxes (a) At the time the exemption is granted, the property: actually paid in those years,plus interest on the difference calculated as provided ]. Is individually listed in the National Register of Historic Places pursuant in B. '112.12(3)• to the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966,as amended;or (A) Any person,firm,or corporation that desires an ad valorem tax exemption 2. Is a oontribut{ng property to a national-register-lured district or for the improvement of a historic property must,in the year the exemption is de- (,- sired to take effect,file with the board of county co toner or the governing`►~'lp 3. Is designated as a historic property,or as a contributing property to a histor authority of the municipality a written application on a form prescribed by the De- is district,under the terms of a local preservation ordinance;and partment of State. The application must include the following information: (b) The local historic preservation office or the Division of Historical Re (a) The name of the property owner and the location of the historic property. sources,whichever is applicable,has certified to the local governing authority that the property for which an exemption is requested satisfies paragraph(a). (b) A description of the improvements real property for which an exemption (12) In order for an improvement to a historic property to qualify the propertyis requested and the date of commencement of construction of such improvements. for an exemption,the improvement must: (c) Proof,to the satisfaction of the designated local historic preservation office or the Division of Historical Resources,whichever is applicable.that the property (a)' Be consistent with the United States Secretary of Interior's Standards for that is to be rehabilitated or renovated is a historic property under this section. Rehabilitation. (d) Proof,to the satisfaction of the designated local historic preservation office (b) Be determined by the Division of Historical Resources or the local histori. or the Division of l Iistorical Resources,whichever is applicable,that the improve- preservation office,whichever is applicable, to meet criteria established in rule'. menta to the property will be consistent with the United States Secretary of Interi- adopted by the Department of State. 8 2 CODING: Words eMieire*+are deletions;words underlined are additions. CODING:Words sleitiren are deletions;words underlined are additions. • DOS Form No. HR3E101292 HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION APPLICATION Instructions This application is to be completed in accordance with rule 1A-38, F. A. C., and the instructions given below. Read these instructions carefully before filling out the attached application. Type or print clearly in black ink. In cases where complete and adequate documentation is not provide4 review and evaluation cannot be completed resulting in a recommendation that the tax exemption be denied. Copies of the rule referenced above, or additional copies of this application may be obtained from the Division of Historical Resources, Florida Department of State, or"the Local Historic Preservation Office in those jurisdictions where such an office has been certified by the Division of Historical Resources. The applicant shall submit a Preliminary Application describing proposed work and receive preliminary approval prior to the start of construction. The Final Application shall be submitted upon substantial completion of the improvements; and must clearly describe the completed work Owners who undertake improvements without preliminary approval do so at their own risk. Under the procedures outlined in rule 1A-38, F.A. C, Preliminary and Final Application submissions will be reviewed within 30 days of receipt of a completed, adequately documented application. Questions concerning the review status of specific applications should be addressed to the Division or the Local Historic Preservation Office as applicable. Notification as to approval or denial of the tax exemption will be made by the local government. The Division or the Local Historic Preservation Office will notify the applicant and the local government of its recommendations regarding the application. These recommendations will be: (a) Approval of the request for exemption; (b) Conditional approval of the request, subject to specific changes in the proposed project to bring it into compliance with the Secretary of the Interiors Standards for Rehabilitation;or (c) Denial of the request for exemption. Address correspondence to the Division at: Bureau of Historic Preservation 500 South Bronough Street RA.Gray Building • Tallahassee,Florida 32399-0250 Telephone: (904)487-2333 FAX: (904)922-0496 Address correspondence to the Local Historic Preservation Office at: Use blank sheets of paper as needed to provide information for which additional space is needed. On each sheet include the Property Identification Number and the Property Address. To amend an application that has already been submitted,submit a completed Amendment Sheet. 1 .:`"+:•.`..... _. +:?:i+ti:. F ..>n.y� _.y,-..._ ;+c7ri: .>:..._wµ'. :r.+; d e.�r+'+.+':soa ::-«r�,.aws:za_ ., EVALUATION OF PROPERTY Owners of buildings individually listed in the National Register or designated as a historic property under a local ordinance need not complete the section of the application entitled Evaluation of Property. For properties designated as historic under a local ordinance, the owner must include a copy of the local ordinance making such designation with the application. For properties within a historic district designated under a local ordinance, the owner shall provide a copy of the local ordinance making such designation and the corresponding designation report. Owners of properties containing more than one building must submit a single application that describes all the buildings within the listing or designation. Owners must report to the Division or the Local Historic Preservation Office, as applicable, any substantial damage, alteration or change to a property that occurs after the Division or the Local Historic Preservation Office makes a recommendation to the local government to issue the tax exemption. The attached Amendment Sheet shall be used for this purpose. Application Review. The documentation in the Evaluation of Properties for buildings within districts must be sufficient to: (1) make a judgement about how the building relates to the district as a whole,and(2) determine what particular features of the building comprise its historic character. In compiling this information it is helpful to consult the National Register nomination for the district or the local designation documentation. It should not be necessary in most cases for the applicant to do detailed research to describe the building and to provide a statement of significance. Completing the Evaluation of Property Description of physical appearance. Provide information about the major features of the building on both the exterior and the interior. Describe the building in its present condition (before improvement), not as it was when first built or as it will be after improvement. Note the architectural style, exterior construction materials(wood, brick, etc.), type of roof (flat, gable, hipped, etc.), number of stories, basic plan (rectangular, irregular, Lr shaped, etc.), and distinguishing architectural features (placement and type of windows, chimneys, porches, decorative interior features or spaces). Fully describe any changes that have been made to the building since its original construction--for example, additions, porch enclosures, new storefronts, relocation of doors and windows, and alterations to the interior. Other buildings on the property such as carriage houses, barns, and sheds should also be fully described. Finally, discuss the way in which the building relates to others in the district in terms of siting,scale,material,construction,and date. Provide date of construction, if available, or indicate the approximate date. State the approximate dates of alterations,and check whether or not the building has been moved. Example Building within a registered historic district: This three-story, flat-roofed, unpainted brick building, rectangular In shape,was constructed in 1850. It features regularly-spaced arched windows on the second and third floors (6 openings on the east elevation have been filled in over the years,exact date unlmown), 2-over-2 double-hung sash, and a prominent bracket cornice. The first floor of the facade has been altered: the existing storefront dates from ca. 1950. On the interior, the first floor is divided into two principal spaces—a large commercial space in front and a smaller office behind. The front room was modernized in the 1950's and contains no surviving historic fabric except for a simple wooden staircase running along the party wall. A pressed metal ceiling is the most prominent feature in the rear office; baseboards,panelled doors,and window and door surrounds also survive in this room. The upper floors have two rooms each, identical in configuration to the first. floor; these rooms retain their original appearance,although they contain no architectural detailing of any kind (see photographs). 2 Statement of significance. Summarize how the building contributes to the significance of the district. This summary should relate to the significance of the district Cmduding the district's period of significance) as identified in the National Register nomination or district designation documentation. Is it similar to other buildings in the district in scale,building materials, style, and period of construction? Note important persons from the past associated with the building,former uses of the property,and the name of the architect or builder, if known. Example Building within a National Register historic district: The district Is an intact grouping of architecturally significant commercial and industrial buildings constructed between 1850 and 1915 that display a variety of styles and types of architectural ornamentation popular during this era. The district is also significant as an early manufacturing and distribution center which led to the city's growth as one of the largest cities in the state. Industrial growth in the late 19th and early 20th centuries required the construction of larger buildings and several still exist within the boundaries of the district(see photographs).This modest three- story building is typical in appearance and history to the majority of the buildings in the district. It was originally built for manufacturing buttons, but was converted into a store with offices above during the 1880's when wholesaling grew as an important new activity in the district. The building is similar to its neighbors in size,scale,materials,and style. Photographs and maps. Provide good, clear photographs of the building and its surroundings as they appeared before improvement. Good photographic coverage is a very important part of the application. Photographs supplement, and to some extent may substitute for, some of the descriptive material in the Description of Physical Appearance. They should show all elevations of the building,views of the building in its setting on the street,and representative interior spaces and features. Photographs should be numbered, dated and labeled with the property name, the view (e.g., east side), and a brief description of what is shown. Photographs should be keyed to the application narrative and sketch map, where appropriate. Provide a map of the historic district,dearly identifying the lot on which the building is located;this is nrncsary to verify the building's eligibility for the property tax exemption. If the exemption is being sought for one of a group of buildings that are listed together in the National Register or locally designated together,a site plan of the group indicating which of the buildings in under consideration is necessary. Special Considerations. Applicants should read carefully the following information about certain special considerations that may apply to their particular case. If a building is in one or more of the categories described below,additional information will be necessary If this information is provided at the outset,the review process should not be delayed. Moved Buildings. An applicant must provide additional information to support application for a building that has been moved or is a candidate for moving. Such documentation must discuss: (1) the effect of the move on the building's appearance(any proposed demolition,proposed changes in foundations,etc.);(2) the new setting and general environment of the proposed site; (3) the effect of the move on the distinctive historic and visual character of the district; (4) the method to be used for moving the building. Such documentation must also include photographs showing the previous and proposed environments, including site, adjacent buildings, and streetscapes. Multiple Buildings. Properties containing more than one building where the buildings are functionally related historically to serve an overall purpose, such as a residence and carriage house, will be treated as a single historic property. Generally, a single application form may be used to request the property tax exemption for these buildings. Documentation,however,must be subs itted for every building to be considered for the 3 exemption. For instance, if a house and carriage house are both to be improved, a single application may be used but a description and a statement of significance and full photographic coverage of each building must be provided. The owner should state explicitly the buildings for which evaluation is requested. A sketch map or site plan should be provided to show the current relationship of the buildings. A single application may also be made to request the exemption in cases where a property is composed of buildings that were functionally related historically to serve an overall purpose(such as an industrial plant). In these cases,the complex will be treated as a single application and proposals for demolition of components will be considered in the review of improvements. If buildings are under separate ownership,however, a separate application must be filled out by each owner. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS The Description of Improvements must be completed by all owners of historic properties seeking to have improvements approved as being consistent with the historic character of the structure and, where applicable, the district in which the structure is located, and thus qualifying for the historic preservation property tax exemption provided by an ordinance passed by county or municipal government. The Description of Improvements may be used to describe proposed or completed improvements. Application Review. All projects are reviewed and evaluated in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's 'Standards for Rehabilitation' (see below). These ten Standards are broadly worded to guide the improvement of all historic structures such as industrial complexes, warehouses, schools, commercial structures, and residences. The underlying concern expressed in the Standards is the preservation of significant historic materials and features of a building in the process of rehabilitation. The Standards apply with equal force to both interior and exterior work, and the Division or Local Historic Preservation Office, as applicable, will review the entire improvement project (including any attached, adjacent or related new construction) rather than just a single segment of work. Evaluation is based on whether the overall project meets the Standards. Proposed work that does not appear to be consistent with the Standards will be identified, and advice will be given to assist property owners, architects, or builders in bringing the project into conformance with the Standards. Completing the Description of Improvements Data on building and improvement project. Indicate the type of construction of the existing building (e.g, masonry bearing wall,wood frame,steel frame, concrete). Give the use(s)of the building before improvement (e.g.,school/vacant); and the proposed use after. Provide the estimated or actual project starting date,and the estimated or actual project completion date. Detailed description of improvement work. In the numbered blocks, provide a description of project work. Describe the entire project. Begin by describing site work, followed by work on the exterior, including new construction,and finally work on the interior. A separate block should be used to describe each work item and its effect on architectural features or spaces(see examples below). In the left block,identify the architectural feature requiring work and indicate whether the feature described is original to the building, was added at a later date, or is new construction. Give the approximate date of the feature. In the appropriate space describe the physical condition of the feature. Indicate the photograph or drawing that shows the feature described. In the right block, explain in detail the rehabilitation work to be undertaken. Describe the effect (visual, structural, or other) on existing features. List drawings,marked or photographs, or specification page numbers that show the improvement work and its impact on the existing building. Photographs. The applicant must submit a sufficient number of good, clear photographs with the application to document both interior and exterior conditions,including site and environment, prior to any work, and to 4 show the areas of proposed or completed work. Photographs of`before'conditions must be submitted even if the improvements are completed; such documentation is necessary for evaluation of the effect of the improvements on the historic structure. Where such documentation is not provided review and evaluation cannot be completed, resulting in a recommendation for denial of the request for exemption. Elevations and interior features and spaces of the buildings should be shown. Photographs should be numbered, dated and labeled with the property name,the view(e.g., east side) and a brief description of what is shown; photographs should be keyed to the application narrative,where appropriate. In many cases,it may be helpful to mark directly on the photographs the areas of proposed or completed work. Photographs may be black and white or color,but must show architectural features clearly. Photographs are not returnable. Drawings or sketches. Drawings or sketches are required for proposed work to show planned alterations or new construction. They must be sufficiently detailed to show existing wall configurations and anticipated changes. Documentation should include floor plans and,where necessary,sections and elevations. All drawings and sketches submitted with the application should be numbered and should be keyed to the application narrative. Examples Feature 1 1 Architectural feature facade brick Describe work and impact on existing feature: Approx.date of feature ca.1880 Will selectively hand clean deteriorated joints Describe existing feature and its condition: and repoint with mortar and joint width to match existing(see spec.pp.33-35);chemically Hard pressed red brick with butter joints in good clean graffiti from first floor piers (see spec. condition. Mortar mostly sound,but deteriorated pp.30-31). and missing around downspout at east end of facade. Some graffiti at first floor. Photo no.j Drawing no.__ Feature 2 Architectural feature main staircase Describe work and impact on existing feature: Approx.date of feature ca.1880/unknown Replace missing balusters with matching Describe existing feature and its condition: pieces. Sand painted banisters and balusters and varnish. Replace treads as needed. Sand Original stair exists between 1st and 3rd floors. and paint stairs. Retain later stair as needed. Some balusters missing and treads worn. Later stair from 3rd to 8th floors. Photo no. 9,10 Drawing no. A-12 PROJECT AMENDMENTS If changes are made to a project at any time after submission of the application,an Amendment Sheet must be submitted for review. Provide the address of the property. Indicate changes in project work, giving the originally proposed treatment and the amended work item description. Give the owner's name. Sign and date the form. Give the owner's address and daytime telepbcne number. Return it to the Division or the Local 5 Historic Preservation Office as specified under the local ordinance. Approval of amendments to applications is conveyed only in writing by the Division or the Local Historic Preservation Office. SPECIAL REHABILITATION CONCERNS Several areas of special concern have been identified in reviewing and evaluating preservation projects. The 'Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings' accompanying the Secretary of the Interiors 'Standards for Rehabilitation' provide further guidance on these and other areas of concern. Owners should take care to address these concerns when undertaking work in any of the areas described below. Storefront alterations. Justify changes to storefronts and-provide photographs of the areas to be altered. Information should be provided on when the existing storefront was constructed; on what the existing physical conditions are; and if a historical treatment is planned, on what evidence the proposed new storefront designs are based. Owners are strongly discouraged from introducing a storefront or new design element on the ground floor that alters the character of the structure and its relationship with the street or that causes destruction of significant historic material. New heating,ventilating,and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems. Indicate what effect the new equipment and ductwork will have on the historic building material. If the HVAC system requires removal of windows or portions of walls, describe alternative systems considered in the design process and why the proposed system was chosen. Installation of systems that cause damage to the historic building material or cause visual loss of character may result in a recommendation for denial of exemption. New Windows. Indicate the condition of existing windows (sash, glazing, muntins, etc.) and the reasons for replacement. Photographs and a window survey must be provided as evidence of severe deterioration;provide data on the cost of repairing existing windows versus installing replacements. Owners are strongly encouraged to retain and repair historic windows. The use of tinted glass often causes a change in character and may result in a recommendation for denial of the exemption. Where replacement of existing windows appears justified by supporting documentation and where the windows are an integral part of the buildings design and character, replacement sash should match the original material, size, pane, configuration, color, trim details, and planar and reflective qualities: Scaled drawings comparing the existing windows with the replacement windows should be provided. Interior partitions and removing interior plaster. Indicate existing condition of the interior and document with photographs. Show which walls are to be removed or altered. Note whether trim elements and plaster will be affected. Owners are strongly discouraged from changing floor plans unnecessarily and from exposing masonry surfaces unless this condition is supported by historical evidence. Exterior masonry cleaning. Owners are strongly encouraged to clean masonry only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove graffiti and stains. Indicate the condition of each material to be cleaned. Specify what the cleaning is intended to accomplish(soot removal, paint removal, etc.) and what the process is to be used on each masonry element. Provide supporting material to show that the method selected is the gentlest means possible for this project. Summarize results of test patches,and include close-up color photographs of masonry surface before and after cleaning as evidence. Exterior masonry repair. Indicate deteriorated areas that require repair and provide evidence that repointing mortar will match the original in composition(i.e.,ratio of lime,cement,sand and any additives),color,texture, and tooling. Owners are encouraged to repoint only those portions of the masonry that require repair. New additions and new construction. New exterior additions may alter the appearance and form of historic structures, and may cause recommendation for denial of the exemption. Similarly, new construction, indud;ng site work, may affect the relationship of a structure to its site, change the historic landscape, or otherwise damage the historic character of the property. 6 a..i�.. - -;aTT: _ w-.: . .. ,..- ... _ •-, �- - s'..waaCi',..NYcr.ss-,. _ -c:.:r =,,.-_._._., THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR'S STANDARDS FOR REHABILITATION "Rehabilitation"as used herein is defined as"the process of returning a property to a state of utility, through repair or alteration, which makes possible an efficient contemporary use while preserving those portions and features of the property which are significant to its historic, architectural and cultural values.' These Standards are to be applied to specific rehabilitation projects in a reasonable manner, taking into consideration economic and technical feasibility. Standard 1: A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment. Standard 2: The historic character of a building shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. Standard 3: Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings shall not be undertaken. Standard 4: Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance in their own right shall be retained and preserved. Standard 5: Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a historic property shall be retained and preserved. Standard 6: Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature,the new feature shall match the old in design,color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of musing features, shall be substantiated by documentary,physical,or pictorial evidence. Standard 7: Chemical or physical treatments, such as sandblasting, that cause damage to historical materials shall not be used. The surface cleaning of a structure, if appropriate, shall be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Standard 8: Significant archaeological resources affected by a project shall be protected and preserved. If such resources must be disturbed,mitigation measures shall be undertaken. Standard9: New additions,exterior:alterations,or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize a property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the maedng, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. Standard 10: `Ncii►`aidditions and adjac =ot7elated new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future,the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. As stated in the definition, the treatment'rehabilitation' assumes that at least some repair or alteration of the historic building will be needed in order to provide for an efficient contemporary use; however, these repairs and alteration must not damage or destroy materials, features or finishes that are important in defining the building's historic character. For example, certain treatments--if improperly applied—may cause or accelerate physical deterioration of historic building. This can include using improper repointing or exterior masonry cleaning techniques, or introducing insulation that damages historic fabric. In almost all of these situations,use of these materials and treatments will result in a project that does not meet the Standards. Similarly, exterior additions that duplicate the form,material, and detailing of the structure to the extent that they compromise the historic character of the structure will fail to meet the Standards. 7 Application Type (Check One): DOS Form No. HR3£101292 ( ) Preliminary Application(Proposed Improvements) ( ) Final Application(Completed Improvements) HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION APPLICATION Instructions: Read the instructions carefully before completing application. No certification will be made unless a completed application form has been received. Type or print clearly in black ink. If additional space is needed,attach additional sheets. L Property Identification and location: Property Identification Number Attach legal description of propeny. Address of property: Street City County Zip Code Name of historic district: ( )National Register district ( )locally designated district 2. Type of request ( ) Exemption under 196.1997,F.S. (standard exemption) ( ) Exemption under 196.1998,F.S. (exemption for properties occupied by non-profit organizations or government agencies and regularly open to the public) If applying under s. 196.1998 F.S., complete Question 9 on page five. 3. Owner information: Name of individual or organization owning the property Mailing Address City State Zip Code Daytime Telephone Number( ) If the property is in multiple ownership, attach a list of all owners with their mailing addresses. Owner Attestation: I hereby attest that the information I have provided is, to the best of my knowledge, correct,and that I own the property described above or that I am legally the authority in charge of the property. Signature Typed or printed name Title of duly authorized representative if signing for organization or multiple owners Date • Page 11i•o DOS Form No. HR3E101292 -.'Y.'^-=�-_ <v_ r. ._ r4:-..'+.: .. .-vgars f_.:_f- ....% .:j-laq�lyM-asy? i+.�-:+..t cry-ry .S ..,._ �.. A., s I S , .0 . • Property Identification Number Property Address 4. Description of physical appearance: Date of Construction: Date(s) of Alteration(s) Has building been moved? ( )yes ( )no. If so,when? S. Statement of significance: 6. Photographs and maps: Attach photographs and maps to application. Page Three DOS Form No.HR3E101292 7. DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS: Include site work,new construction,alterations,etc. Complete the blocks below. Feature 1 1 Architectural feature Describe work and impact on existing feature: Approx.date of feature Describe existing feature and its condition: Photo no. Drawing no. Feature 2 1 Architectural feature Describe work and impact on existing feature: Approx.date of feature Describe existing feature and its condition: Photo no. Drawing no. Feature 3 1 Architectural feature Describe work and impact on existing feature: Approx date of feature Describe existing feature and its condition: Photo no. Drawing no. Feature 4 Architectural feature Describe work and impact on existing feature: Approx date of feature Describe existing feature and its condition: Photo no. Drawing no. Page Four DOS Form No.HR3E101292 Feature 5 1 Architectural feature Describe work and impact on existing feature: Approx date of feature Describe existing feature and its condition: Photo no. Drawing no. Feature 6 I Architectural feature Describe work and impact on existing feature: Approx date of feature Describe existing feature and its condition: Photo no. Drawing no. Feature 7 1 Architectural feature Describe work and impact on existing feature: Approx date of feature Describe existing feature and its condition: Photo no. Drawing no. Feature 8 Architectural feature Describe work and impact on existing feature: • Approx date of feature Describe existing feature and its condition: Photo no. Drawing no. • _ Page Five DOS Form No. HR3E101292 8. Property Use Uses(s)before improvement: Proposed use(s) after improvement 9. Complete only if applying for exemption under s.196.1998,F.S.(property occupied by non-profit organ17ation or government agency and regularly open to the public) Identify the governmental agency or non-profit organization that occupies the buildinp How often does this organization or agency use the building? What is the total useable area of the building? square feet How much area does the organization or agency use? square feet What percentage of the useable square footage does the organization or agency use? % Is the property open to the public? ( )Yes ( )No If so,when? Are there regular hours? ( )Yes ( )No If so,what are they? Is the property also open by appointment? ( )Yes ( )No Is the property open only by appointment? ( )Yes ( )No Local Historic Preservation Office or Division Use Only The Local Historic Preservation Office or Division has reviewed the Historic Preservation Property Tax Exemption Application for the above named property and hereby. ( ) certifies that the above referenced property qualifies as a historic property consistent with the provisions of s.196.1997(11),F.S. ( ) determines that improvements to the above referenced property are consistent with the United States Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. ( ) determines that improvements to the above referenced property meet the criteria set forth in rule 1A-38,F.A.C. Comments: Recommendation to the local government is to ( ) issue the tax exemption or( ) deny the tax exemption. Signature Typed or printed name Title Date DOS Form No.HR3E101292 AMENDMENT SHEET Property Identification Number Address of property: Street City County Zip Code Name of historic district: ( )National Register district ( )locally designated district Indicate all changes in the project work,giving the originally proposed treatment and the amended work item description(use additional blank sheets if necessary): Attach photographs and drawings as necessary to illustrate the proposed changes. Local Historic Preservation Office or Division Use Only The Local Historic Preservation Office or Division has reviewed the Amendment Sheet for the above named property and hereby: ( ) certifies that the above referenced property qualifies as a historic property consistent with the provisions of s. 196.1997(11),F.S. ( ) determines that improvements to the above referenced property are consistent with the United States Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. ( ) determines that improvements to the above referenced property meet the criteria set forth in rule 1A-38,F.A.C. Comments: Recommendation to the local government is to( ) issue the tax exemption or( ) deny the tax exemption. Signature Typed or printed name Title Date • DOS Form No. HR3E111292 HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION COVENANT This Covenant is made the day of , 19_, by (hereinafter referred to as the Owner) and in favor of the State acting through the Division of Historical Resources or the Local Historic Preservation Office for the purpose of the rehabilitation of a certain Property located at which is owned in fee simple by the Owner and is listed in the National Register of Historic Places or locally designated under the terms of a local preservation ordinance or is a contributing property to a National Register listed district or a contributing property to a historic district under the terms of a local preservation ordinance. The Property is comprised essentially of grounds, collateral, appurtenances, and improvements. The property is more particularly described as follows: (include city reference, consisting of repository, book, and page numbers) Page Two In consideration of the tax exemption granted by (local government) , the Owner hereby agrees to the following for the period of the tax exemption which is years: 1. The Owner agrees to assume the cost of the continued maintenance and repair of said Property so as to preserve the architectural, historical, or archaeological integrity of the same in order to protect and enhance those qualities that made the Property eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places or designation under the terms of the local preservation ordinance. 2. The Owner agrees that no visual or structural alterations will be made to the Property without prior written permission of the (Division of Historical Resources or the Local Historic Preservation Office) . 3. The Owner agrees that the (Division of Historical Resources or the Local Historic Preservation Office) , its agents and designees shall have the right to inspect the Property at all reasonable times in order to ascertain whether or not the conditions of this Covenant are being observed. Page Three 4 . In the event of the non-performance or violation of the maintenance provision of the Covenant by the Owner or any successor-in-interest during the term of the Covenant, the (Division of Historical Resources or the Local Historic Preservation Office) will report such violation to the Property Appraiser who shall take action pursuant to s. 196. 1997 (7) , F. S. The Owner shall be required to pay the differences between the total amount of taxes which would have been due in March in each of the previous years in which the Covenant was in effect had the property not received the exemption and the total amount of. taxes actually paid in those years, plus interest on the difference calculated as provided in s. 212.12 (3) , F. S. 5. If the Property is damaged by accidental or natural causes during the Covenant period, the Owner will inform the (Division of Historical Resources or Local Historic Preservation Office) in writing of the damage to the Property, including (1) an assessment of the nature and extent of the damage; and (2) an estimate of the cost of restoration/reconstruction work necessary to return the Property to the condition existing at the time of project completion. In order to maintain the tax exemption, the Owner shall complete the restoration/reconstruction work necessary to return the Property to the condition existing at the time of Page Four project completion on a time schedule agreed upon by the Owner and the ( Division of Historical Resources or Local Historic Preservation Office) . 6. If the Property has been destroyed or severely damaged by accidental or natural causes, that is, if the historical integrity of the features, materials, appearance, workmanship, • and environment which made the property eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places or designation under the terms of the local preservation ordinance have been lost or so damaged that restoration is not feasible, the Owner will notify the (Division of Historical Resources or Local Historic Preservation Office) in writing of the loss. The (Division of Historical Resources or Local Historic Preservation Office) will evaluate the findings and notify the Owner in writing of the decision to remove the Property from eligibility for tax exemption. The Property Appraiser of the county in which the Property is located shall also be notified in writing so that the tax exemption can be cancelled for the remainder of the Covenant period. In such cases, no penalty or interest shall be assessed against the Owner. 7 . If it appears that the historical integrity of the features, materials, appearance, workmanship, and environment which made Page Five the Property eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places or designation under the terms of the local preservation ordinance have been lost or damaged deliberately or through gross negligence of the Owner, the (Division of Historical Resources or Local Historic Preservation Office) shall notify the Owner in writing. The Owner shall have 30 days to respond indicating any extenuating circumstances which show that the damage was not deliberate or due to gross negligence. If the Owner cannot show such extenuating circumstances he shall develop a plan for restoration of the Property and a schedule for completion of the restoration. In order to maintain the tax exemption, the Owner shall complete the restoration work necessary to return the Property to the condition existing at the time of project completion on a time schedule agreed upon by the Owner and the ( Division or Local Historic Preservation Office) . If the Owner does not complete the restoration work on the agreed upon time schedule, the (Division of Historical Resources or Local Historic Preservation Office) will report such violation to the Property Appraiser who shall take action pursuant to s. 196.1997 (7) , F. S. The Owner shall be required to pay the differences between the total amount of taxes which would have been due in March in each of the previous years in which the Covenant was in effect had the property not received Page Six the exemption and the total amount of taxes actually paid in those years, plus interest on the difference calculated as provided in s. 212 . 12 (3) , F. S. 8. The terms of this Covenant shall be binding on the current Property owner, transferees, and their heirs, successors, or assigns. This Covenant shall be enforceable in specific performance by a court of competent jurisdiction. Signature of Owner Chief, Bureau of Historic Preservation or authorized local official (enter date of signature) (enter date of signature) . • C. L Cl. N, w i • o j I ),,11 Ll &11 �J • ' . w �, 7 _ .L 1 i �-1 -�" ::: :: `ram ) �L i. � � � � v:: ; a rr — - r — .� u G:; • - 3 CID :-E• . \ 4‘)..... 'givil C al.. • , $ • p-o ►fit.. i 1 i HAMMOCK HOUSE ELEVATION "A"/OPTION # _ Design Revised: 2/20/94 Dan Sloan Scale: 1/8" = 1' 0" . - . ,T , i.-...r ! s . i L. [1 i GL3 a ,, s x o gv ,o, ,.4 ct 5 .6.4 (.5 py v C. ° -o o 2 011111- . • r4irmeli41 pure - cz J-. cE) s?- blilii N _hwill _ - . n u rr p _ t. , 75 .c ,.. \ i . . _ ----- 1 I If III -°1 Ns El pi . : f _ f .1 41 iaril n I - in° I _ i in ism!! 1 Erma ij,„,..4"). ; : : : . y ��T .� ( Ord C1 J_� 17 i- v VIII rut 1 07! IIII iItis1iiiI1 , 1.71 i'Ll . 1 cip g g 0 I orL117:4-1-1 I I ..: {1 I gr,1 ' FINS 1,I ‘-. r Prr 1 Li 1- tenant .141114Mpl I el %., .,:i .73, :f. I1 i ..',..do..,'. I me v. .... . __.__. - - A4‘ I ' 1 F-1 ,: rak.7112E1s1 k la I ! HAMMOCK HOU SE ELEVATION "B"/OPTION #1 ft Design Revised: 2/20/94 Dan Sloan Scale: 1/8" = 1' 0" K E- U J 4 1 .T > 1 C. 0 C .! P ^ J i- O Etl F c. i r t 'O � l i _____, ) E3 L. o ; dv 1 G= " U G � I al 4 - E • ;�, c p Q � G nis n 1 ma IRIII Ii'iI . ,... ,: K d s z50� M f t .:=== 1.----=?{°c2./4° \---/ .../ P 'il.: c 4; C V H HOUSE ELEVATION "C"/OPTION #1 ' HAMMOCKr ! Design Revised: 2/20/94 Dan Sloan Scale: 1/8" = 1' 0" MI . . _ • ' ... 1 0.) i t- C. 41 v.) I ,. i 0 i 41 1 0. 11 • 0 .4C/ . , n kOtti .aglighilb. , '5 C.) . 4.... .0 „ Str 8 J --111i -I -1‘-' 81 , E a.4 1 . •T••4 • P.-4 W (..) ,' : ,4 ,,, , •",_ n -1, : i;1424 4 . .' L i g . . . •._._1_...,% ,,,• , ' \.Agii4 f:1 L' .1 ( . C . .--' ' '`) L-• "E3 1; 1 • ),.;., ,, e.) • r:,, 771.2 1,...1 i I 1 i 1 1 . ...._ I'.* *.%%‘..Li• I i . k,,,,,,i =1 ' a .c . 1 . . (1 te---.,—.4-=.41 _ • . , k, Tic,„i C..• .... g. I 1 ‘ 11 _ LE- 1.1 i —— . an _ 4 -- t 11.1. 1 111111 MIMI I.la I an W. i 11 t;-. --: ,••IP- c..1 (5 - • L. ,•, - - . i , 1 ,---- . , ti . . -•— cZ,), t '40 .t - i i - -'i,-, - I- - - 4 • , ii,-‘• ,,.,f.-‘ c.,,,o ; ;':.] c'. I 1 U. N;A..." 1 17:: BM r ' '-Zill 'c):' -:-..-• ' 4 ' ! (s''• ..:' 1 1 4 4 '.- I t e•-, 41 4;••••• ••....-..-----, r - .4 -, __, 4 I t‘i '`(' '.CI) 't 0 4'i,"2 . . .: ................_____-_,..c.--_•••--...,;;_-_,;....-....-....,,r4-747=- • 4*- t .2 2. t14.... ' I : f cl I t i i HAMMOCK HOUSE ELEVATION "D"/OPTION #1 i c..)— f.. c, 1ili1 I -cz i i Design Revised: 2/20/94 Dan Sloan Scale: 1/8" = 1' 0" • . (-- ;; — L. p c . i . ........ .L.... ....— -.. .-..,-- 0 1:1 aCU 0 r u U i 3 • — .L d ___,,- - - 7--:: ' 7[ 171.A k r5r . ' , .., = L• -cc { le"T": r . its •-• 0. ;•.- r r° Uc ::: 11.11,1iii IL - ( —117 1 ' i V 410.• I , E i 1 i1 V s ' HAMMOCK HOUSE 3RD FL FLOOR PLAN OPTION # 2 Design Revised:2/17/94', Dan Sloan Scale 1/8" = 1 '0" _ • = I_ i .T i ,T L. E.. 1 1{{ G H c 5 [, c. P1 7 J U 1 s II c — k;1 v U 1-4 Iie2il , 1.: p Q —..t-----+ --4-- 111-11" c..) ;.'"_, g ,1 — -_ _ -, — (.4 ,....,r � 2 � i ---, ---fl -91' •zt-it WI,. ,,,,zs L-1-. 2 17.: ii r �� ` Cj T ' G .' I - _ -- fiI n— - — ' iiiiirv'v ^ i l L C 1; ` U HAMMOCK HOUSE ELEVATION "A" OPTION # 2 v i 1 Design Revised:2/17/94 Dan Sloan Scale: 1/8" = 1' 0" r 1, e.." • , / .r � l � . YGp tuq .,!,„ . ._T�r = i•rliij•t11 ..c � f E . . 1 n_ , Add Pii dits 1 i. -, ..d . Jilt. 'ik,..-::•;;A M .ez c.4 t; i 1 LfiIT A i i i _� .. :-1 F • I \. _ .. , (.4: _ ,...... , .... - 1 r gi il "ai 1 ___., t _ • ...-, '7" ! r., . , t _ ,, , r C. 1. V-11 / ;10 v • 1-7.- ' ial2lafill . •••• r:-.) a•-'. 7 ,i ; .; „:, , , ., , Ufa f' i _ , � 0•:::*.fir - i L.� 'J IllI I ` `�� I . Y - a ' 1 i TRIPLEX ELEVATION "B" OPTION # 2 Design Revised:2/17/94. Dan Sloan Scale: 1/8" = 1 ' 0" ...' . - . . . . . . :... . I *:- . - -•-• Li -. CL) 11 . . *C .1% :Le = . . . re. C., • ;:e .= ,i - 4 ---', .7; 11 . 1 •-• = -3. ,..) -1 .....7„.....„7„.....,,,,,e, —_1... I 16" . 1.---.- ,. • 1 •-•.. --,.. _ ---.... '1;iili4.1 1 •-:,',1 7,- fs --,_ J . . --...-. , i,,,.„„, --, , t.., 4 ../ .. • . , . •' •••••- -.0- 4 . • 1 " . . .....1 04.4.1 •-• . • i I V."-"'N - L., , ....—. I I I 1 I U - '''.-.".-:.4 ';), 'I - _ . ' 1.P' .dgEll 1 • ; ; , h i 's ______s\,_ - n_i . i . L„ ' •.r. ,..,......-:',, 1 ...., ?, '''' . -- V. 0 I Cd ..'-:. F "t -...... - — ---"- I' - . --- .----- ---1--.- -. II. -- -.---- - . . . .-.-- i = . •r: [., r—d . -z I _ . ____.____ ,. [.....a,......,..; c-:, 1 1 . .... -,),.. I -_-_ •-• ..... .1 ----- ------- , ''" _ _ ___ ____ ‘•:-.. ..i i r,-, -7.., .1.-, = 1 1 --...._ .1 .— . —. I --- 1' 1 • io"Th 1 —•••• ' L. '..) \........,%-•.-) '' -TT- ',-1---- ------- , _ .... Li ..... . . • ... . -.., _ , it ' r.-..: •,-:. 1, : ,..-. c 1,1 i• 1 --„, --‘7. __________: ... .. . ..4: . a 1 t -. : . . _.. ._.....__. . i c: c ,.. ._. . . - TRIPLEX ELEVATION UCH OPTION # 2 I, . , H • Design Revised:2/17/94: Dan Sloan Scale: 1/8" = 1' 0" • • , ...-: _ . Mr • .r t 3 C• r L I v 1 RI L i C i c i =,, 1 C ti7 0 7 . co I c Of— P c) .'t Lia. , C)• ,...- 5,iiI'LL: = — --- s ram+ 9 ' . ---7=7.1.,..L___ _____ : . b.1"."411: ".."..4.. .. F UC ! i 1 'I i EI i -- 111__. 1 I , 1 II — Lift :I), o I I .I .a� ( ,ram I' '•-->t—� � O f �i i — — —_ Ti— t J _ f. 1: i' i i c� 1 HAMMOCK HOUSE ELEVATIONiv! OPTION # 2 , Design Revised:2/17/94 Dan Sloan• Scale: 1/8" = 1' 0" a{ k -. ..i t 1 II 3 C I; '1 11 u i • • . 1'� 7i0 0 y _ / j 1 L C C: O i II II { r J I ;rIk • 1 P i = E q '$- 1 O I alCA M. I L '.N o` R I '. — — — 1 iI = r: . T.. '. C)I IA i I .' U o x 1 - , - � `:. - ;I C---- ' r--� f E o I 1-I1-.-or" %,,,,'-�2N",,=;-4,/`_}. (, t f l i\J i E I1 L v E. 1 ,I C� j 3 CAR GARAGE FLOOR PLAN i Design Revised: 1/1/94 Dan Sloan Scale: 1/8" = 1' 0" - . • 1 I r. T r V L Q. kk' fJ ti ' L Fi ! at 4 c. •5 k = p s tt; 9 i = }•I 9 •o j5 • `2 i L o •; `. o , Z I. 1c. la U U d -I, - r i t vt--isi et I .a•°:: t 1 i y a U 1 121^�II c� a E , - t. 0 1.1 8 - IL. 1 1 W u u . f I :. • , • rl a i C II •. -:i. ___HIril . . . - • • . • (n0 g •.• lr•-•. a% •/a0 I ,.\\i' . t,. = .2 L' I: s U I 3 CAR GARAGE ELEVATION "Q" 3 CAR GARAGE ELEVATION "R" Design Revised: 1/1/94 Dan Sloan Scale: 1/8" = 1' 0" Design Revised: 1/1/94 Dan Sloan Scale: 1/8" = 1' 0" i . r •T ty t_1 a 1 I. L 11 G Fi J a f.' c 1 J hilt 1 1 II 1 L / }--- .1 o J 1 1 � `� GC � G i,i _a_-.—\ J L 7__` c ` ca � �, c H Y• t fi r1C.) _ -i i.^'-"=� c U i i-- -- ----- ---- , c c 1 1\ ' El _ . , I 1 1 \ • _•\ i'.,_ 1n7-71, • I`L r '[Y a j . . it in) . • ' 11 Ell Eil[:1. • r HISTORIC RESIDENCE ELEVATION "U": ExistingView , i Design Revised:1/1/94 - Dan Sloan Scale 1/4"=1'0" c `1 ; ii - r-r w pk a D'-p' . o L N �Z�o6P 1 ►� I� l� ��t .. 1 1 o G ill • .. i i cd �a °.,. , •1 z. '� 71 . 8 wig WirlbM ibid. ! ,1 iiil'1 ,- ;.0 6 ,- • i 4-•zr-ti c g 1 10000,14. 0 - -- - ,+- cC " i �_ _ � \it.� _\ � � w IIIII • -1 ••mow • O U i U i o ;� r. f._ F---- i. _ . . . F.'., ,*" HISTORIC RESIDENCE ELEVATION "V': New Opt. #1 E .•-. •- Design Revised :./1194. . �''• ' '. . '.4"1.. ..A"' ©an Sloan Scale 1/4"=1'0" - _ I s r H. G j c ----- /► Wn WI1-,iPoUr-2('5Is'x5.5 I • �INO I1 I _ �kl�'('I� Llde WII� i Et7 •� ! 1 � 1 i \\ j--1 'y - c - C.) 0 - - L.3 C y x , 1 , (-'e'J ''''41/4,7.,.,,i,.,.. 1 ..:0) c : . iilI I1'" • I I I a 6- . • gs ci0111 • • i I \ c.,, d I I___ I . '111 -I. i '•1 w II, " • ' • 4 . i ----41 . • P 4 • .... : 4fe• . • - ' 0 ,--•4 11 • l . 1-1MIIIIIIMMINNII ' =1 . . r .. . w i . ,,,......,...„,..,._ , . • -4 • I . - c I iCha"--' •• -c t ' ...4;..7 . . l 1• •ca f ' k' B t - i ; i v i HISTORIC RESIDENCE ELEVATION "U": New Opt. #1i , , p . . Design Revised:1/1/94 Dan Sloan Scale 1/4"=1'0" . - , - • _ i =,• 1 1 . . EAST SOUTH S 7TH AVE 1 ,_ ... .....- i - - , c,..., 1 I II 1 - 7/ I 1 = cJ ‘ --• '''' I 1 I , I i i V"".":.;-''4 • .—. i I t _j 't:7 r:'..' •-• . 1 -..„4,.,. •.-., ,_ o .,, -4 1 (--) 0 i t..... .6 0 1 i . . ....% North Entry Gate . . , 1 ,\• -•,..,„ z.--.., ,,,, ....',.. c), [d . q , - ,„ ;--, 1 . \.,. ..„,-1(' (JcQ li "::: •L'. CDM 1 1 ; Vi,- 3 ..,,, cz Cw, ..-. I FtfZ....--.......1."."'"'''''—.4..C1341.4,,4461131410..- ' . _ South Entry Gate • 1 (51"4"' • , ••'-' eR . i'li.J.-/- 1 -L. - 1 '• 1-i rt'llr illz-' r e-1-,c:/e- Li, , I, / - I , • i pel i ' 1•; ''-'' ' .-e'' : '') C.) 6 1 0 '4 •. < i I .,..'!"1 -....., Ci 1:: 1 i ; / " . .-. = .-. *c.,161), Ic. ; C l'• .I. : ("I , 14/.M'le..!t. dt'e- ' ,-- •c-i- 1 -= u 1 i , , .. i5u I LA:21 . . . ,iI(, —. :• ::- ,'_Ir:I!„,../'- (•, 1- ' (J.u—;--J:1., .,L"c2—_r.----E,-.y.-.',,,•...:-;. . ,, — EAST PROPERTY LINE FENCE PLAN , 1".7-L`c00FI.'r- .1-....-. , ,, 1i•',.. ,{ , - Design Revised:2/17/94 Dan Sloan Scale 1/1 6"=1'0" . NM J t t + c, i { C., i c L- n V ,r i Lfl - c-, =-,-.,,,, ..„, 8 ce> u n U i , U M11 f� is _ 1 w , :1-1.il-h-rr ki.21-4H._,,,j —L-, Y .- . i ---124:— ----� � �G L - milW�� e i , 4 ‘ -h%i0 '(1�tea4. . C -7,,,,:c.).:;;• � v L1 'l `(. l ► ►-� ` ii k �1 'r l I - :c WW' � 5� h ) - -`-' I . i — ----w."2--letril:, K.,\4-..' ..: (W i 1,' 1 , '- , -2, , v ,.„:.__,, , ..,..._, , , ......_. ..„, , , ,,I, is '�} ,.._ — { I - ( ' j} L. .M �. Y-- - C , , ', �1,' I i , C i i i -- __-1 j ' iI, j •- I •�• I ( ( / rwx��J1&_.6 U �YG L.,Le t , ~. `-:, I, .' II v_______ . �� , I :I rac1,4 ,.. — 1 I, : 7.w+11II i f U SOUTH ENTRY GATE ELEVATON "Y' NORTH ENTRY GATE ELEVATON Y V Design Revised:5/23/93 Dan Sloan Scale 1/4"=1'0" i__, Design Revised:.2Ii'►I i Dan Sloan Scale 1/4"=1'(Y' i t, Et i- COLOR & MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS SLOAN HAMMOCK RENTAL COMPOUND 106-114 SE 7TH AVE DELRAY BEACH,FL REVISED 1/1/94 By Dan Sloan, Florida Home Construction Corp. BUILDING ITEM COLOR MANUFACTURER'S# .. ..HAMMOCK..,. Bands ip2.Base.of Bldg. Natural P.Treated, Sealed Na HOUSE Siding(Wood or Vinyl YELLOW Olympic MachineCoat:PM-307 (TRIPLEX) All Vertical&Horz.Trim White 011ympic M.C.:WhiteBirch Window Surround Trim White 011ympic M.C.:WhiteBirch Windows(Aluminium) White Factory Finish Porch Floor Natural P.Treated, Sealed n/a All Exterior Doors Blue M.A.B. , Cajun 313-30d Railings(Aluminium) White Factory Finish Roof Natural Aluminium Galvalume by USS, "v"crimp SHED Bands © Base of Bldg. Natural P.Treated, Sealed Na Siding(Wood or Vinyl) YELLOW Olympic MachineCoat:PM-307 All Vertical&Horz.Trim White 011ympic M.C.:WhiteBirch All Exterior Doors Blue M.A.B. , Cajun 313-30d Window Surround Trim White 011ympic M.C.:WhiteBirch Windows(Aluminium) White Factory Finish Roof Natural Aluminium Galvalume by USS, "V'crimp P&C Bands @ Base of Bldg. Natural P.Treated, Sealed n/a RESIDENCE Siding(Wood or Vinyl) White 011ympic M.C.:WhiteBirch (NEW S.F.) All Vertical&Horz.Trim White 011ympic M.C.:WhiteBirch Window Surround Trim White 011ympic M.C.:WhiteBirch Windows(Aluminium) White Factory Finish Porch Floor Natural P.Treated, Sealed n/a All Exterior Doors Blue M.A.B. , Cajun 313-30d Railings(Aluminium) White Factory Finish Roof Natural Aluminium Galvalume by USS, "v"crimp 3 CAR ..- Bands © Base,of Bldg. Stucco n/a GARAGE Stucco(text to match) YELLOW Olympic MachineCoat:PM-307 All Vertical&Horz.Trim White 011ympic M.C.:WhiteBirch 1. Window Surround Trim White 011ympic M.C.:WhiteBirch Windows(Aluminium) White Factory Finish Alt.Windows(Wood) White to match Olympic White Birch Porch Floor Natural P.Treated,Sealed n/a All Exterior Doors Blue M.A.B. , Cajun 313-30d Garage Doors White Factory Finish Railings(Aluminium) White Factory Finish Roof Terra Cotta "S"or Barrel)Tile;concrete HISTORIC Bands @ Base of Bldg. Stucco n/a RESIDENCE Stucco (text to match) YELLOW Olympic MachineCoat:PM-307 All Vertical&Horz.Trim White 011ympic M.C.:WhiteBirch Window Surround Trim White 011ympic M.C.:WhiteBirch Windows(Wood) White to match Olympic White Birch All Exterior Doors Blue M.A.B. , Cajun 313-30d Roof Terra Cotta "S"or Barrel)Tile;concrete . MISC. Front Fence . Whte Pickets to match Olympic White Birch ELEMENTS Wall @ Hist. Resid. YELLOW Olympic MachineCoat:PM-307 Side&Rear Fence Natrual P.T.Shadow Box n/a Entry Gates WHITEor Stained Natural. to match Olympic White Birch Entry Gates Whte Trim to match Olympic White Birch Walkways (typical) Natural PT on s'9epers n/a Walkway to Hist. Resid. SIM. CORAL ROCK PAVERS n/a NOTE: REVISED ITEMS IN ITALICS (FROM 5/18/93 VERSION) Sloan Itam.flL3ck 114 SE 7t11 Aye,e, Deir m 'leach, Florida . . e_ "ITI: c Construction Documents and the Conceptual Design Drawing they arc predicated upon arc the property of Florida Home Construction Corp.C 1992):III r;;ehts reserved.Not to be used without the express written permission of FI-ICC. STAFF REPORT HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING MARCH 16, 1994 AGENDA ITEM IV-B COA 8-221 107 NASSAU STREET THERESA AND STEPHEN GROTH, OWNERS ROY SIMON ARCHITECT/AGENT ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is that of granting approval for COA 8-221 to allow an addition to be constructed on a contributing single family home in the Nassau Park Historic District. BACKGROUND Built in 1936, this is one of the first houses constructed in the Nassau Park subdivision. ANALYSIS OF THE PROJECT This is a 2 story addition to the rear of the residence. An existing family room which was constructed in 1960 will be demolished in order to raise the finished floor and support the second story. The addition consists of 490 s .f. ground floor family room and laundry with a 533 s. f. master bedroom and bath above. The existing roof configuration will remain. The addition will have vinyl siding to match existing and the roof is to be cement tile to match existing. The project meets the setback requirements for the R-1-A zoning district. This is an attractive and appropriate addition which does not substantially alter the original structure. The 2nd story of the addition is set back 63 ' from the front property line and while it will be visible from the the road should not negatively impact the streetscape. ALTERNATIVE ACTION 1. Approve COA 8-221 as presented based on positive findings to Section 4 .5 . 1(E) (7) . 2 . Deny COA 8-221 based on failing to make positive findings to Section 4 .5 . 1(E) (7) . RECOMMENDED ACTION 1 . Approve COA 8-221 as presented based on positive findings to Section 4 .5. 1(E) (7) . M� APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 100 N.W. 1ST AVENUE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 The Historic Preservation Board meets on the first and third Wednesday of each month. This application must be filed 15 days prior to the next available meeting. Address of Property 1027 Nassau Street G'2/ g- 22 / Affix One Clear Picture .t-Vt iy5s • �} . _ _ _ ems.. x.--:-----1"."-- Lwii L., a--• y kY -;;4, • ..ZZ -sue icy,: ;:e' -j '• , 1 r�ai f d� { -2: Ye 1fiP ,•t: — t •��• m,,- —" s 36s 523� wk :;,` s _ ..t• . r� r � ! X l 5 r l ,v l: S!. 0 I'E 110 0 r- / new Ft.1r Roor/ 1 A 1 J 1 Sr /,/G r., '•A ti /4V oiAr A/GNr 'EL EVA TIoN OF PPoPOSEn N£W RQO41 SCALE 1, I' .E4IS T, ,,C8:1//9r/"1 EX►SririQ )IOlc.SR` OOF � NrW rl4r Roo ' ._ ---•Q""--tr_ 71 u If Rr u u u 'nr-1+—'7 (ilonSrO _ _ or t A►C. ,jv,n p' v HHio•/% .0 r EnrG..A OG.._.._.. 11AFTf/ S OF '-• E,l,f r,NC. 8L0R. I E vT . -01 �r 3 • 7 *I 6.4/15s "A . DI C L `lQF A . CI-I/► PMAl FOP O; sris r/no • ]S" ExrJT,n ) Al. E. //. :/, C r•� 1. r;!i n u 4 �___� __..__.___._� D 6 -34 I. tR AY .81. A (.' )1, /-/. A A . PRol✓r ELEVATION of PRovosF. u Nt►V Rvoni CONG'liL ) ). PAIit) SCALE y" = /' ) N1) I.). rl‘'/_ /iv 7) /1 U/.cl'1 ;Y /4,e7--/,' .e'LFv4",, I'c O 0 /V1 Pl. A !►' BY �J Ah) 1 :i • L. tll,�ll'PJ,1 K _ 1 ,-� ; ...4. `4. kr.....4e.Z.E.4••• r:r...Arin4-12,il.b.54"2.14-1M- 1..rluTy I:4Z C.;F...,4711.4•:, ,/:'4..riA3 FeM.t g3.4. ' • I ...":4...r• 4 . ' • I ,,,,.%°1-../I., 03-JAZZ"- ti pi,1 • . ,i,Le.- 1 )44...,... -I.e...-.7" • c.-.• , F..,.."-....co ,...,.Ar i I I ! i II 4--t. 1 / I ,! c .14,4•CW kr.....E:f4 -In i . I i 16 I . .. ...._.--.,..-. a. -...A - _,„............ Lhe I •,•CCL iei-r-.-` 1 - 1 • —_ ._=_... ----.4..- • ; --4 1 F:44-4.* - o • o I . I 1 -;I _• . • . ,,, 1 1 i ; ' ;. Is; , 1 1 GE:W , 0 r .v _______ —__1_ .s r-- " • 6: . •. _•:::•..---,' ..1.1 •V . I{-Ca.c.:.-pet.L. rci, -,-,I ' I . -1-.-7i...1-• --4- c41 I tl'qc# • -. :_,,,„...,z:.-4.-....e . I --'' -:.c....!.; 4, ' \ . ,,• ,. Es-171-c, I I —- ,: •: ir 0241..e,511.4Pia -()! \ I it 1 I i k Ls v _..,-,--,f--,---, 1 -,...,1 : X 7 L----14-4- \- d ,4 v_;•••-r, I I- -•, 1 I LT. t) -I ,.--..:_1.•cr.::c-..G. ----a.1-iC 1.55 -1'., ..... . N i -•°-z--,-... ••.4----:-.-.:•h7 . I q ""4cz. ..... . 1,.......—4., 4 / I :4- ,., If _LI e,_.•:-..2.10 k-r:F.7.4; ber, ..> - 1 I - - iii 4.5 ......, r.c:f•.:;.. =_.:C.g I __IL, 1 L(,-.,^,•+ r------ -711 :!' •.31iF 4$ ,1 - i t-- - - . ':t:,-t 41-e Al r.44 . I ; I— f.'9 ! •I :. ..„.., • N I i.1 •CA 1 1• 1 , ......._ .......---, q .:.4Y t.J.1.,,, ' Tr- - , , . ... i : ,t---7- -----) , .,..,..,,:t ?....a"*.v. i ; -9..i ,i-CeCo.t. ,,(tra,..0 i -di i V.-C-e. 4....trz....» I ••71. .. .:'•-e; IH 4-o.442 il ' 'ct 1 I -:...f.....; ______ ....I . , _ ___ ..,,, --4"----.4. \t f ! -.....- 4 1 •=-,- . I, , I -_• -o: if • _ a -t---, . - . i: 4,. : -13 i- in. Is_..r:f.. .. tr%. -'---) i I ; • • c.:Fit, •1 -zrrr,itz.'..... , • -———_T__. Il. \ i.14 AXraci-:Ai- . le&at oa . %--Pc...I few,CEtce0-0 -...0 WA.. • 1 Y.C. 1 1 0 ;: I• Z• -' : no),ystr.....g. 'C I C? I I :. I I i• VI••• .----7.--— I••• I a 0 e,•• -' a 1 . 1 ft.)..^...,.., , . .cy. r2 "r^._•rr -e-......11. 1 IT-4"EFT'..;14E. Lona ', ta:rri f • • o .I .7-- . _._ ____,3----.- 4 ____.I_.----.. —I-.- - --.7‘.'MT. 4 FfiZ*11.›.1‘...444.LL-1-67,......7-)./ 1 li 'i,: `,..._"R"...410EL-Z woe CF-4^,f: •WP,AVus(.1,,fr...+L..• -....>,4;..t..,Eea-:.•.:.r.-,---- , • ' e ..,,I,`-'£4•47 -C.4, / ir...44g.,-."F rpopstw F-.:••••:. -4 .,-,...7L',.....L'-fg-, . ".••• a Em.lni40 Ei...,M.ol• ,I •Thi ?I.-•.:14- ;'.71 ..1... .,:.D.oli ... --.. - •Y;.- -- t-',40-:ii;.'t.4"t'T. .. , SITE PLAN --71. Jt �� ! a . • I I,1.''' r '/ .,I �f `], . I r • V �. •• I f f / . 1 ►,a�"0 ' id,,'. ✓ , ( • • „ ,+ , •I f F, •^;'^GL, .., iSL't I„ryr+pi '�' •s� IIr 1.� ( • _ /, , /, , , . .� •i i +. it�f ,. {i• •,;,'3r14 N y 1.i,re •I ..k' I . rit . �'IRT i0' , F'• •>"' '""` '1"'` �. 4.f,,�!1�• ,•, .:.,. +.r/ '.. ,•�,••'' !d .:.u1 U�. 1 �: r, , „f. T""�44 •z r. � %. ,•a -•' y + ! ••.yR �^' 'f I�r1 (a/!F'.'f,S 1". y'[�. +� 1 7.SMV / ;.' r .i.i t• .,., M I`'' fi 4'� ''!L'' � "r,F- ,"�` '^ -r 1��r� l •" .R,M,'" ,; -� '� }P It, . , I , y1 •l •,, , 1 •/,. K, rA. F '+.iu fI' �•�4: 1.'.�S1y i, 1';1 •I ry•A�41•.4 • •1 /// , V 11: 7)r, ;'•.. ,.',,• i � R.. t . • 4( /'.r r .,�� •,...,:•„`, ;rl )p %. ; - -'... „.1,... 1t / "4>'r' !4 o- I 0 . •t,.., .y;. r, ,. , . .+'R'f .`Y�l,r.:,r„r••+ LyrMs;wv" * '. • ti �3.• �•:`I , • r '•(• L , r 'l� +' , �{ i.,�;1 J: �•. 1 (✓� • !• "6 C , I, '0A4%• , •✓. "� t�r '5•• • /' + . . Y*, • ., �.j' ' .�.etiji i ): I f ir� (( ,rl- .'• ..' • '..,Ar'•1•.-:',•I.i',' t .APrt �. I �'r .aw y• +' . . . / �r v.,. .'.,'''lt t4 . �J�i��+.•r(J1Nil' .!• 'Jr • • , • �''3 ..-1..'es-.srN..� 71�Ir ,�• S• ;7,Y .I.... •,YYP :'S'�� ' I + •, .+....1 '- ' S� 'I ,.A, {_,/$41•.r}.'• ! .,.... } , , • < +r, f • ✓ :,..f y.1 .G ., ,;/-�y7..r , -. •y .. It Vawee . S4 R t 4� y {1ir•. ,'lire,:'1��I' .,r,�i• 'r,' �� , 4 ' r1 W1n'.41'f',(''R'►J. {+ •• iw .,ti4jirei. .,r•/.i"�}11„., f • . I ' ,' t `I K . / • '( `:4.t' 11 Mat4 4, r `,k t, ; •, .1. yt I I I , r (f',' ..r..«• .'•A'''•;ttW'4,r•'t ,7,):f., ,�,•t Iry ' 1 io r7,'i . f •..., .ir},' e, I. i t t i d. + i`"' ,. ` ,,•4 ► r�` q/ I l tti t #' w II +, �;�, I & � iy ,•t.' ,. Sv. 1 :ill..., ' - ; .MR1. . - p, br,� s It "#••• J!R, ''$ , r. 17I.'c' f1 { '. r. .r 1 • 1 '• • 'lw . ...• i}i i ', y l. '� '., J, 't."I ♦' , , ' l