Loading...
HPB 05-18-1994 . UELRUY BEACH 1r Wild ill / I: AGENDA 1993 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH • Meeting Date: May 18, 1994 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: 1st Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286 .0105. I . CALL TO ORDER II . APPROVAL OF MINUTES: May 4, 1994 III . PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: None IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. COA 217-A, Doc' s Soft Serve, 10 West Atlantic Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Debora Turner Oster, Landscape Architect, Agent. Minor Site Plan modification to allow a 19 space parking lot to be constructed to the west of the building. B. COA 8-197-B, Mariposa Adult Care Home, 48 S.E. 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Ninan Cherian, Owner or James Chapman, Agent. Re-roof from cement tile to fiber glass shingle for the original single story portion of the building. C. COA S-049, 603 S .E. 4th Street, Marina Historic District, Viola Zurro, Owner. Installation of a 14 ' x 17 ' aluminum carport to the west of the residence. Historic Preservation Board Agenda May 18, 1994 Page 2 D. COA S-048, 701 N.E. 3rd Avenue, Del-Ida Park Historic District, Lisel Rudderman, Owner. Re-roof from cement tile to fiber glass shingle. E. COA 8-224, 354 N.E. 1st Avenue, Contributing residence Old School Square Historic District, Susan Cross, Owner. Construction of an attached garage, handicapped access ramp and driveway to the rear of the property. F. COA 8-225, 160 Marine Way, contributing residence, Marina Historic District. Claudia & Stephen Echols, Owner, Francisco Perez, Architect Agent. Second story addition to the existing residence. G. COA 8-226, Lot 13, a vacant lot adjacent to the north property line of 160 Marine Way, Marina Historic District. Claudia & Stephen Echols, Owner, Francisco Perez, Architect agent. New construction of a single family residence. H. COA 8-227 Lot 19, a vacant lot adjacent to the west property line of 102 N.E. 8th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District. Mr and Mrs William Stone, Owners . New construction of a single family home. V. DISCUSSION AND ACTIONS ITEMS None VI . REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Reports from Historic District Representatives B. Board Members C. Staff VII . ADJOURN POSTED ON : May 12, 1994 i Pat Cayce, Historic Preservation Planner MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD PUBLIC HEARING WEDNESDAY, MAY 18, 1994 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM 100 N.W. 1ST AVENUE DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444 I . ROLL CALL: The Chairman called the meeting to order at 6 :00 P.M. Board Members: Christine Bull Absent Daniel Carter (Chairman) Present Sandy Jamison (2nd Vice-Chairman) Present Buck Miller (Vice-Chairman) Present Margie Miller Present John Vaughan Present Charlie Williams Present Staff Members Present: Jeff Costello, Planning & Zoning Department Pat Cayce, Planning & Zoning Department Diana Mund, Planning & Zoning Department II . APPROVAL OF MINUTES: May 4, 1994 Meeting Margie Miller moved for approval of the minutes for the May 4, 1994 meeting, seconded by Sandy Jamison. The vote was as follows : Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - Yes; Margie Miller - Yes; John Vaughan - Yes; Charlie Williams - Yes. Said motion passed 6-0. III . PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: None. IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: A. COA 8-217-A: Doc's Soft Serve; 10 W. Atlantic Avenue; Old School Square Historic District; Debora Turner Oster, Landscape Architect/Agent. The Board moved to approve COA 8-217-A for a Minor Site Plan Modification for the Doc's Soft Serve Parking Lot based upon positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards) of the Land Development Regulations and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to the following conditions: 1. That revised plans be submitted addressing the Site Plan Technical Items (1-6) of the Staff Report and the addition of Technical Item 7 "That the typical parking stall striping detail show a handicap accessible space per ADA Standards and a compact car space" . 2. That a 2 ' dedication of right-of-way for Atlantic Avenue be provided by this property as well as the existing Doc's Soft Serve site; and, 3 . That a Cross Parking Agreement be recorded. Sandy Jamison moved for approval of COA 8-217-A (Site Plan) , seconded by Buck Miller. The vote was as follows: Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - Yes; Margie Miller - Yes; John Vaughan - Yes; Charlie Williams - Yes. Said motion passed 6-0. The Board then moved to approve COA 8-217-A for a Landscape Plan for the Doc's Soft Serve Parking Lot based upon positive findings with respect to Section 4 . 6 . 16 with the following conditions: 1 . That an additional Royal Palm tree be provided (in the landscape area where the backout spaces are being eliminated) ; and 2 . The dumpster fence be stained a darker color or painted to match the awning to be approved by staff. Sandy Jamison moved for approval of COA 8-217-A (Landscape Plan) , seconded by Buck Miller. The vote was as follows : Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - Yes; Margie Miller - Yes; John Vaughan - Yes; Charlie Williams - Yes. Said motion passed 6-0. B. COA 8-197-B: Mariposa Adult Care Home; 48 S.E. 1st Avenue; Old School Square Historic District; Ninan Cherian, Owner; James Chapman, Agent. Change of roofing material from tile to shingle. A motion was made to approve COA 8-197-B based upon positive findings with respect to Section 4 .5. 1(E) (8) (Visual Compatibility) . Said motion was denied 4-2 . Sandy Jamison moved for approval of COA 8-197-B, seconded by Margie Miller. The vote was as follows: Daniel Carter - No; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - No; Margie Miller - Yes; John Vaughan - No; Charlie Williams - No. Said motion was denied 4-2. - 2 - 05/18/94 C. COA S-049 : 603 S.E. 4th Street; Marina Historic District; Viola Zurro, Owner. As the applicant did not attend the meeting the Board tabled this item. D. COA S-048: 701 N.E. 2rd Avenue; Del-Ida Park Historic District; Lisel Ruderman, Owner. Change of roofing material from tile to shingle. The Board moved to approve COA S-048 based upon positive findings with respect Section 4.5. 1(H) that undue economic hardship exists. Sandy Jamison moved for approval of COA S-048, seconded by John Vaughan. The vote was as follows: Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - Yes; Margie Miller - Yes; John Vaughan - Yes; Charlie Williams - Yes . Said motion passed 6-0. Mrs . Cayce discussed a text amendment to LDR Section 4 . 1.4 (Uses of Lots of Record) with the Board. E. COA 8-224: 354 N.E. 1st Avenue; Old School Square Historic District; Susan Cross, Owner. Garage addition. The Board moved to approve COA 8-224 based upon positive findings with respect to Section 4 .5. 1(E) with the following condition: * That Lots 15 and 16 of Block 65 be joined by a Unity of Title before a building permit is issued. Sandy Jamison moved for approval of COA 8-224, seconded by Buck Miller. The vote was as follows: Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - Yes; Margie Miller - Yes; John Vaughan - Yes; Charlie Williams - Yes. Said motion passed 6-0. F. COA 8-225: 160 Marine Way; Marina Historic District; Claudia & Stephen Echols, Owner; Francisco Perez, Architect/Agent. Addition to existing residence. The Board moved to approve COA 8-225 based upon positive findings with respect to Section 4 .5. 1(E) . - 3 - 05/18/94 Sandy Jamison moved for approval of COA 8-225, seconded by John Vaughan. The vote was as follows: Daniel Carter - No; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - No; Margie Miller - Yes; John Vaughan - Yes; Charlie Williams - Yes. Said motion passed 4-2. G. COA 8-226: Lot 13, a Vacant Lot Adjacent to the North Property Line of 160 Marine Way; Marina Historic District; Claudia & Stephen Echols, Owner; Francisco Perez, Architect/Agent. New construction of single family residence. The Board moved to approve COA 8-226 based upon positive findings with respect to Section 4 .5. 1(E) as presented. Margie Miller moved for approval of COA 8-226, seconded by Sandy Jamison. The vote was as follows: Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - Yes; Margie Miller - Yes; John Vaughan - Yes; Charlie Williams - Yes. Said motion passed 6-0. H. COA 8-227 : Lot 19, a Vacant Lot Adjacent to the West Property Line of 102 N.E. 8th Street; Del-Ida Park Historic District; Mr. & Mrs. William Stone, Owners. New construction of single family residence. The Board found the following design elements to be incompatible and inconsistent to Section 4 .5. 1(E) : * The townhouse appearance created by the "fire wall" effects the east and west elevations; * The location of the massive garage doors across the front facade; and, * The inappropriate fenestration on the second floor of the front facade. The Board voted to request a continuation of COA 8-227 in order to allow the applicant to consider more appropriate solutions to the incompatible design elements listed above. Sandy Jamison moved to continue COA 8-227, seconded by Charlie Williams. The vote was as follows: Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - Yes; Margie Miller - Yes; John Vaughan - Yes; Charlie Williams - Yes. Said motion passed 6-0. - 4 - 05/18/94 V. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS : None . VI . REPORTS AND COMMENTS : A. Reports from Historic District Representatives None . B. Board Members Mrs . Miller informed the Board that she was resigning from the Board as she would be out of state for the summer, but she would like to be reappointed to the Board for the 94/96 term. C. Staff None. VII . ADJOURNMENT: Sandy Jamison moved for adjournment at 8 : 00 P.M. , seconded by Margie Miller. The vote was as follows : Daniel Carter - Yes ; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - Yes; Margie Miller - Yes; John Vaughan - Yes; Charlie Williams - Yes . Said motion passed 6-0 . The next meeting is scheduled for June 1, 1994 . The undersigned is the Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for May 18, 1994 , which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on June 1, 1994 . Diana Mundy If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes . They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes . - 5 - 05/18/94 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH --- STAFF REPORT --- MEETING DATE: MAY 18, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: 'V.A. - . - - - - - ITEM: COA 217-A MINOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION FOR DOC'S PARKING LOT (DOC'S SOFT SERVE) TO ALLOW A 19 SPACE PARKING LOT TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE WEST OF THE BUILDING nirii1 LIJ LL1 LE Lii,i I -- ■I■ tri t _..... .... ,y,11 yes+r. ■_. MI�� — . r �— < K. �� .—— � �Vr ,_._ z SCHOOL .11=1.MOM Ell d e " u . —b-- >1 El V , — �wv'- -.vi a =T`T ST — z MMr ■/ . _ — ATLANTIC AVENUE cci�x�ieHT� �u�r'01""ir � , 11, 'I. ",1 11JJi4( J< < per <_ .—ram vommomr < < < HOUSE or— -— _--.1' .0 ii d N d — id,— w j, GENERAL DATA: Owner Phillip Vultaggio Agent Debora Turner Oster Jerry Turner and Associates of Florida, Inc. Location Northwest corner of Atlantic Avenue and Swinton Avenue. Property Size 0 38 Acres City Land Use Map Designation Mixed Use City Zoning OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) Adjacent Zoning. . .North: OSSHAD East: OSSHAD South: OSSHAD West: OSSHAD Existing Land Use Vacant land (west lot) and existing Doc's Soft Serve restaurant (east lot) Proposed Land Use Construction of a 19-space parking lot with associated landscaping on the west lot. Water Service Existing 12" water main located on the north side of Atlantic Avenue. Sewer Service Existing 8" sewer main located within the alley on the north side of the property. ITEM B E F ORE THE BOARD : The item before the Board is that of consideration of COA 8-217A which incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for Doc 's Parking Lot (Doc' s Soft Serve) : * site plan; and, * landscape plan; The subject property is located at the northwest corner of Atlantic Avenue and Swinton Avenue, within the Old School Square Historic District. BACKGROUND : On November 3, 1993, the Historic Preservation Board approved the COA 8-217 for Doc's Soft Serve (awnings, lattice fence, dumpster enclosure and nostalgic sign) . On November 24, 1993, a non-impacting site plan modification was approved for Doc ' s . The modification included the awning and dumpster locations, and • the installation of landscaping to comply with the perimeter- landscaping requirements . During processing of the modification, the applicant stated that a request to construct a parking lot for Doc' s on the vacant parcel immediately west of the building would soon follow. This parking lot request is now before the Board for action. PROJECT DESCRIPTION : The development proposal is to construct a 19-space parking lot with associated landscaping on the vacant lot immediately west of and adjacent to Doc's Soft Serve. The parking lot will be a double loaded with driveways onto both Atlantic Avenue and the east-west alley which runs along the north side of the property. A centrally located pedestrian connection is proposed from the parking lot to Doc's restaurant. On the Doc' s Soft Serve site, the 3 existing back-out parking spaces along Atlantic Avenue will be removed and a 5 ' landscape strip will be provided. SITE PLAN ANALYSIS : CHAPTER 3 (REQUIRED FINDINGS) : (Performance Standards - L.O. S . ) Pursuant to LDR Section 3 . 1. 1 (Required Findings) , prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, the staff report, or minutes . Findings shall be made by the body which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to the Future Land Use Map, Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency, Compatibility, and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations . HPB Staff Report Doc 's Parking Lot - Minor Site Plan Modification Approval Page 2 The proposed parking lot will not have an impact on findings with respect to the Future Land Use Map or Concurrency. Comprehensive Plan Consistency and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations are discussed in the following paragraphs . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY: A review of the objectives and policies of the adopted Comprehensive Plan was conducted and the following applicable policies are noted. Traffic Element Table T-4 Atlantic Avenue - The ultimate right-of-way width for this section of Atlantic Avenue (between I-95 and Swinton Avenue) is 110 ' . Presently, the right-of-way width is 106 ' . Therefore, pursuant to this Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Palm Beach County Thoroughfare Plan, a 2 ' dedication of right-of-way for Atlantic Avenue by this property as well as the existing Doc ' s site is required. COMPLIANCE WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. Parking Requirement Pursuant to Section 4.4.24(B) (9) (a) within this area of the OSSHAD zone district (along Atlantic Avenue) , the parking requirement for restaurants are calculated at 1 space per 300 sq. ft. The total floor for Doc' s (including outdoor dining area) is 2,160 sq.ft. , thus requiring 8 parking spaces. Presently, there are 7 parking spaces on the site which is an existing nonconforming situation. Based on recent site inspections, the 7 parking spaces are insufficient for the customers as they also park on the adjacent vacant lots. In conjunction with the installation of the 19-space parking lot, the 3 back-out parking spaces along Atlantic Avenue are to be eliminated, thereby providing a total of 23 parking spaces . Loading Area/One-Way Drive Pursuant to Section 4.6 . 10(C) , a loading area is not required for restaurants with a gross floor area of less than 3,000 sq. ft. The restaurant contains 2, 160 sq. ft. of floor area, therefore a loading bay is not required. HPB Staff Report Doc ' s Parking Lot - Minor Site Plan Modification Approval Page 3 With the review of the site plan modification approval of November, 1993, the 10 ft. wide paved area on the west side of the Doc's building was allowed to remain to be utilized as a loading area/one-way drive. However, the substandard width ( 10 ft. ) and the lack of maneuverability renders the driveway and loading area nonfunctional. Site inspections have revealed that the alley and parking area north of the building are utilized for loading purposes. Given the above, it is appropriate that the excess pavement (west of the building) be removed and replaced with landscaping consistent with the balance of the site. In addition to the above, as this driveway is within close proximity to the Atlantic and Swinton Avenue intersection and the proposed parking lot driveway, the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) may require removal of the driveway as a condition to obtaining a permit to install the new parking lot driveway. Site Plan Technical Items The following are items do not require specific action of the Board however, these items must be addressed with the submittal of revised plans . 1. In order to install the new driveway onto Atlantic Avenue, a permit must be obtained from FDOT. 2 . A stop sign and stop bar must be provided at the Atlantic Avenue and alley driveways. 3 . The compact car parking spaces must be signed as such. 4 . Site lighting pole locations must be indicated on the site and landscape plans, and fixture details provided. 5 . Pursuant to Section 4.6 . 16(E) (3) , curbing must be provided on each side the Atlantic Avenue driveway. Flumes can be appropriately spaced within the curbing to allow drainage to flow into the landscape areas. 6 . The curb which encroaches into the alley right-of-way should terminate at the property line. LAND S C A P E PLAN ANALYSIS : The landscape plan provides an entry feature along Atlantic Avenue consisting of Royal Palms with Jasmine underplantings . This feature will compliment the improvements that have been made along the Atlantic Avenue corridor. Live Oaks will be provided along the east and west property lines and a Cocoplum hedge will be installed around the perimeter of the parking area. The hedge along the west side of the parking area should be placed along the property line. t HPB Staff Report Doc ' s Parking Lot - Minor Site Plan Modification Approval Page 4 Where the back-out spaces are being eliminated, the width of the landscape area should be increased and an additional Royal Palm tree provided. If the one-way driveway is to be eliminated, it is appropriate that the excess pavement be removed and replaced with landscaping which is consistent with the balance of the site. OTHER I T E M S : Unity of Title or Cross Parking Agreement The overall project consists of 2 separate lots under the same ownership. A 19-space parking lot is to be constructed on the west lot which will be utilized by Doc ' s Soft Serve on the east lot. With the elimination of the back-out parking spaces on Atlantic Avenue, a portion of the required parking will be provided within the proposed 19-space parking lot. If the west property were sold, a nonconforming situation will be created as required parking spaces will be under separate ownership or eliminated. Therefore, in order to prevent the creation of a nonconformity, either a Unity of Title, thus combining the lots, or a Cross Parking Agreement must be provided. REVIEW BY O T H E R S : The development is not within a geographical area requiring review by the DDA (Downtown Development Authority) . Community Redevelopment Agency At its meeting of April 28, 1994, the CRA (Community Redevelopment Agency) reviewed and approved the development proposal with the conditions that the back-out parking along Atlantic Avenue and the driveway on the west side of the building be eliminated. ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION : The proposed development is consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan and Chapter 3 of the Land Development Regulations . The proposal is located on one of the most prominent corners within the Atlantic Avenue corridor. With the removal of the back-out parking spaces at the intersection of Atlantic and Swinton Avenues, a hazardous traffic situation will be eliminated. This development will enhance this portion of the Old School Square Historic District and the Atlantic Avenue business corridor. HPB Staff Report Doc ' s Parking Lot - Minor Site Plan Modification Approval Page 5 ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS : 1 . Continue with direction. 2 . Approve COA 8-217A for the minor site plan modification and landscape plan for Doc ' s Parking Lot based upon positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards ) of the Land Development Regulations, Section 4 . 6 . 16 , and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, subject to conditions . 3 . Deny COA 8-217A for the minor site plan modification and landscape plan for Doc ' s Parking Lot with the basis stated. RECOMMENDED A C T I O N : A. Site Plan Approve COA 8-217A for the Minor Site Plan Modification for Doc ' s Parking Lot based upon positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards) of the Land Development Regulations and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to the following conditions : 1 . That revised plans be submitted addressing the Site Plan Technical Items ( 1 ) of the Staff Report; 2 . That Lhe loadiuy aLealone-way chive along--the—west removed; 3 . That a 2 ' dedication of right-of-way for Atlantic Avenue be provided by this property as well as the existing Doc ' s Soft Serve site; and, 4 . That either----a--Alnit-y of - Title or Cross Parking Agreement be recorded. B. Landscape Plan Approve COA 8-217A for the landscape plan for Doc ' s Parking Lot based upon positive findings with respect to Section 4 . 6 . 16 with the following conditions : 1 . The—width -of the landscape area where the back-out parking spaces are being eliminated be increased and an additional Royal Palm tree be provided; and, 2 . The one-way driveway is to be eliminated, with the excess pavement to _ be removed and replaced with landscaping consistent with the balance off-the-site. Attachments : • * Site Plan * Landscape Plan JC/Y c DO C P A RK.DOC _ -. _ ..___._.--__ J Ill U ' 0.55 I 10' ALLL1' _ —__ 0--Wr"—. J, 21,.. — . e ---oE— --- -- �— __ —I QI 6' Curb 1 1 .-- _ I1 Exist. Line — . i r -- D Tpster • `I; /— . \\Enclosure IXIS71NG a n;�,o.�_----- -- ---/ ,nn.• 1\ PA2<INCz .. N 6' Curb anchor R ;I .alt. u e — -- J � . 0 . arc.o,l II I u h jcvN �iN r l'Zf\ r I --- —Conc.Uk:eel �� 11 111 IIStop (typ) I -- I O i r' I 1 f' j 11 Li ill I --- `— - -- I .I -al o S I GC1:G. SIDEWALK Ex15nnG 111 I I Gor.G.WALK o __ ---- ' • III o, - �— l- I I �- L I 6' Curb�. I I II 3 I I, I h J1lti 111 I i. c� - _ i• Ill } �� v"! jl c� 1�1�1 \ DOC'S Q u I� -- —Ex,et 1 SOFT SERVE , 7_ 1 1 in cons. 1 ., GurO 77 I Z �. n •c' I 5- f . [ r; III O 'w, JW II _ 1 6, h' Curb — l :-. iss I , __ . , 1 .NL ! - • 69 so' 1...\ \---\---. -- . .., — _---. I / y r ' ,/ .yr/' ,v// cy // � y, `r. :/Y.% rlrC i. y• y .fi /, i ,/, •›/i l i , 7• / am' , i • . • __ . 1 i —__- • 1_,istin2 elgne And �G/1nl lra sh can to be J tD rr•Iccated ATLANTIC AVENUE ' 6 -- III -- -- --- le ' ALLEY _ <' —..,1 — ——O ---- -- %1`4_ O = FP� -- AI 5 O D Z - D . i. -- -- 1^ : .) 6' Curb II r - EXISTING;' fL g `i FAR.KIN , (..I I: 122 -. - :.\ - 6' Curb • 1 I Exletfng Menoob—` .— 0 0• / ----� 1 ,„ (f to be removed ''•�; I L — • t. til Gonc.lire& 0 0 L Stop ltyp) • tit -- 1 , • -- — I , 1 Exi5TihG 1 CONC. 5•DcWAL< CONIC.w.t C —_ r _ / 1 6' Curb _. l'. 1 a Ill EHisting Od!c Tr: .--1_ 1 I: . . U I • [�OC J 11 I f .:I - 1 to Remo in \ -' \ 1 . _�__ �.a n� I SOFT SERVE n •� � ® L ( 3 (1) •1 41 i I 6' rb 6' Curb — ,% "`- JAS 'h ei -4.4_- .)...$ i;;<: 85 - - = 1 5 0 D 1 � 66 SOD 1 ..•`,- /Y / , i /:TI / > 5, > ./ YS,I r'<`› '%,4 <•, i / % 7/1! f• %`/•>'' , /;••/;.•/.•;i%:JY•r; tt/ 4 ./(/,'/vr. ,' 5Y/ l•f (/[yJ�^,,, (, r�› J /./ .4, //!/ „i'i•/// i/�/ J . 1/ , -///.'.'/. ..: '!' /. ,11-'.1J<f l '![,�+11//!IJ-t.il'bL11f /Y•'/•J/, '.�!'YY YY//��/�l.J�'/ l '-LLLJ.-LJ.J/JJ-LJ -_1.J..- '�/.... /' J�J.,:L -_�J /JL,.J_l-J. 111'�i. , 11If - -- CANDsciti A/ • t" A, I >= 4 STAFF REPORT HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING MAY 18, 1994 AGENDA ITEM IV-B COA 8-197-B Mariposa Adult Care Home, 48 S.E. 1st Avenue Old School Square Historic District Ninan Cherian, Owner or James Chapman, Agent. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is that of granting approval to allow a change of material for a re-roof from cement tile to fiber glass shingle for the original single story portion of the building. BACKGROUND The building was constructed in 1955 as a single family residence. At a later date when the building was converted to an adult care facility a two story addition was added to the rear. The main portion of the building retains its original cement tile roof, however the addition was constructed with a fiber glass shingle roof. ANALYSIS OF THE PROJECT The building is situated on the northwest corner of S.E. 1st Street and S.E. 1st Avenue, with the front entrance facing S.E. 1st Avenue. The roof of the original building is a prominent design element to the vernacular 1950 's style of architecture. The location of the building on a corner gives the roof additional visibility as the entire south (side) portion of the structure is presented to the streetscape. The roof of the second story addition is less a factor to the aesthetics of the street as it is elevated and set back further from the property line. The building's pleasing irregular hip and gable roof is its distinguishing architectural feature. It is a commercial property which is well maintained and occupies a prominent corner in the Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD) . Purposes and intentions of OSSHAD include stabilizing and improving property values; stimulating awareness and pride in the City' s architectural heritage; and encouraging the restoration and preservation of existing structures. The Delray Beach Design Guidelines state that it is inappropriate to strip the roof of its historic material, and while this is not a contributing structure, the roof material is historically correct for the style of the building. A change in 4 roofing material will inappropriately alter the visual compatibility of the roof to the building. ALTERNATIVE ACTION i. Approve COA 8-197-B based on positive findings to Section 4 .5. 1(E) (8) Visual compatibility 2 . Deny COA 8-197-B based on failing to make positive findings to Section 4 .5. 1(E) (8) Visual compatibility RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Deny COA 8-197-B based on failing to make positive findings to Section 4.5. 1(E) (8) Visual compatibility ---i• - F----- 1. N. 'C r 2 �` x. Tim"' � ;� _ h,..._ R._3�' _ ^"� t "��. 4 -, t I • :4 • rf- • ___ .41 } . .. , 2 t f _ Zor 4. fie, i - . . 72-1- -_ - o 411-i-011" a-A-1-;?-7&-2_) .0-7v /441-- , t.�;� Y. - al4/1 aLL- r A ,moo STAFF REPORT HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING MAY 18, 1994 AGENDA ITEM IV-C COA S-049 603 S.E. 4th Street, Marina Historic District Viola Zurro, Owner. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is that of granting approval to allow the installation of a 14 ' x 17 ' aluminum carport to the west of the residence. BACKGROUND This building was constructed in 1938 as a winter cottage. Over the years its exterior has been extensively altered so that only the roof line is original. For purposes of built inventory the structure is not considered contributing to the Marina District due to its lack of original elements . ANALYSIS OF THE PROJECT The proposed carport will be attached to the west wall of the residence and will be located over the existing concrete pad. It will be 14 ' wide and 17 ' deep with a flat roof. Aluminum structures are not appropriate in historic districts and a more suitable carport would be one of pipe and canvas or wood construction. Adding an aluminum structure to the front facade of the building is not consistent with Section 4 .5. 1(E) (9) which refers to the Design Guidelines. The Guidelines state that new construction with artificial or manufactured material is inappropriate and obtrusive in historic districts. However, this house has a large aluminum porch attached to the east wall which is visible from the street, and it is possible that the proposed aluminum carport will provide balance as viewed from S.E. 4th Street. Additionally, a decorative canvas or wood carport might visually overpower and draw attention to the plain front facade. Therefore, positive findings to Section 4 .5 . 1 (E) Visual Compatibility, might be feasible. It could be argued that the compatibility of the street facade as a whole takes priority over the concern for aluminum structures, and that taken on a case by case basis does not set precedence in other situations . ALTERNATIVE ACTION 1. Approve COA S-049 based on positive findings with respect to Section 4 .5. 1(E) Visible Compatibility, with the following condition: That the aluminum carport be the same color as the aluminum screened porch. 2 . Deny COA S-049 based on a failure to make positive findings to Section 4 .5 . 1(E) (9) Visible Compatibility with respect to the Design Guidelines. RECOMMENDED ACTION Board's discretion • ti • b�-\Ra Q2A��' _.- _ . • . . I►� -: 1_ z 13,I1 , • - - , ;•- MAX •• .(.,L, _ - i Y �� Sv 1390,ar<< - .. '�1 -_ -- ._ 1.-. - �i._. =sue _ ,i - :#V • (if ' _ -- -. _--•.:. _.._ - - - _ ;.: _•- • • _ t - , _ • _ j • i - • . - _?fir._ - _ `Kti \ • r •'•ram 1 z. -01.1111111111.10.... pia .1.1•01M` t ♦ • • • C G,ii C • ,•l Y2V. \ tl /fl° 2". ./V a 1 rt T,•41!/� �.•j „ , :'-7F, \ /All tr- k r s ( I �' ,A, \.. ?CJ1 ' W a ✓� -- — -,�c1i'. ? ' .,r, v. //f---,:l .i',/-2 c'Dfd 1 ( ---_______ . tiN CI\ \.._ ,( 6) _•.__..�>, -�•� I SG v'l�r'/// -D,-z9:Z0e'�/:'-'' e.: rn :. /,PO/(/ D0 Pa46 oiK/d•P.L PilDNE ut/Es-J�, -,',C �`�y'.-rr V -- ---- 1.•I • • ,, -' ;: . tip, •f:!TL• ''°.. '): .r1:� • . '.t••/%•.,.'/ /�.. ' ,•'Y'•�..' / w :ik L r. .G�+7 fi ,. , ,i•y T. y { Y, /i C. tI ?. 1 t. a y ' Wt& y'1.'J , i 1 • lIrk010 • •4' Y.Y� .rt,ais5 •J� . ......... ..,,,,:i.. ,,,,o,.. ..„;.: ".I ..,., . . ill . y S0,,,-1 . i .. , „ tr.r,:tt t..,eu;....,..,:....' ..0. . { tz.'. k V1! 1 st Mil 12w.' t y`� �11 9 f �t 'sd7 A 1 • W► ""Q pp j'1 I q r 7 • L E t g t t t. V t k 1. .7 1.A ilj r I.,iI 4'�, �� � '� d orlt A r� :i.r° Ili4l Y ?' _,�i'r� F t 1 k II STAFF REPORT HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING MAY 18, 1994 AGENDA ITEM IV-D COA S-048, 701 N.E. 3rd Avenue Del-Ida Park Historic District Lisel Rudderman, Owner. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is to grant approval for COA S-048 to allow a material change for a re-roof from cement tile to fiber glass shingle. BACKGROUND This single family residence was built in 1960 . It is a rectangular structure with a single gable roof which runs from north to south and continues over the attached carport. The roof is prominent but is not an architecturally defining feature of the structure. The owner has attempted to have the roof repaired but due to rotted wood beneath the tiles this is not possible. The owner prefers to replace the roof with cement tile but states that due to the cost of cement tile she is unable to afford the replacement. The owner also states that she has contacted the CRA with respect to an interest free loan but has been informed that no funds will be available until October, 1994 . According to the applicant the roof is leaking to such an extent that the ceiling has collapsed in several places . ANALYSIS Pursuant to Section 4 .5. 1(E) , Visual Compatibility and the Design Guidelines it is inappropriate to strip roofing material which is historically correct from a building. The change from cement tile to fiber glass shingles will alter the visual compatibility of the building. In order approve the change of material and to be consistent with respect to the criteria for granting COA' s it will be necessary for the applicant to submit a claim of undue economic hardship, pursuant to Section 4 . 5 . 1(H) . Due to the urgency of the situation staff waived the required 15 day application filing date which would have placed the item on the June 1, 1994 agenda and scheduled the hearing for this meeting. As the applicant was unaware that she would need to document the hardship, that information is not included in the staff report. Documentation for the claim will be available at the meeting. I. ALTERNATIVE ACTION 1. Approve COA S-048 based on positive findings to Section 4 . 5 . 1(H) that undue economic hardship exists . 2 . Deny COA S-048 by failing to make positive findings to Section 4 .5 . 1(H) , undue economic hardship. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Approve COA S-048 based on positive findings to Section 4 .5. 1(H) that undue economic hardship exists . E } ;-=� , _�-K .-_. `•.. t: ft. r . r -`ls t:� . f i `E" . , yam,- ti'?. 1 _ _ _ ____ - ... «- _ itjOM -per` •; - -.-e�y�+L~+Y"'~^ - v��< _ p TO THE DELRAY BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD The following information is submitted to the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Board to document a claim of undue economic hardship with respect to a change in roofing material from the original cement tile to fiber glass shingles. (a) Amount of purchase $60,000 Date September 85 (b) Value 1992 $52,003 1993 $51,373 (c) Taxes 1992 $ 860.84 1993 $ 744.25 The property is for sale and there is a VA loan on the property which is assumable. The loan can only be assumed if the roof is replaced and brought up to code. cc) Section 4 .5. 1 (G) Chief Building Official will attempt to have the structure repaired rather than demolished, and will take into consideration any comments and recommendations by the Board. However, the provisions contained within division (A) of this section shall not apply to the Chief Building Official's declaration that a building is unsafe, nor will the Chief Building Official be precluded from taking whatever steps, as may be required by applicable ordinances to protect the public health and safety of the community. The Board may also endeavor to negotiate with the owner and interested parties, provided such actions do no interfere with procedures in the applicable ordinances . (H) Undue Economic Hardship: In any instance where there is a claim of undue economic hardship, the property owner may submit, within a reasonable period of time, prior to a meeting with the Board, the following documentation: ( 1) For All Property: ^¢ k (a) The amount paid for the property, the date of ti �L C1Q,rk3L �1 purchase, and the party from whom purchased; Wr0 ( (b) The assessed value of the land and improvements thereon, according to the two t,�•L' � most recent assessments; (c) Real estate taxes for the previous two years; (d) Annual debt service or mortgage payments, if 'l . any, for the previous two years; (e) All appraisals, if any, obtained within the previous two years by the owner or applicant in connection with the purchase, financing, or ownership of the property; 01ylU (f) Any listing of the property for sale or rent, price asked, and offers received, if any; and (t y (g) Any consideration by the owner as to profitable adaptive uses for the property, including but not limited to possible fair market rents for the property if it were rented or leased in its current condition. (2 ) For Income Property lActual or Potential) : (a) The annual gross income from the property for the previous two years, if any; (b) The annual cash flow, if any, for the previous two years; and 4510 page 2 Contract Price: We propose to furnish all materials and labor in accordance with above specified work for the total sum of: $ 29800 . 00 OPTION: Upgrade shingle to a 25 year dimensional type, add the sum of $235.00. • Reroofing to be flat all white flat tile, for the sum of $7,300.00. Uuarant : Workmanship and materials guaranteed for a period of five r 5 i years from the date of completion. Contingency: * Decayed wood decking, if any, will be replaced at additional cost. Total wood replacement charges added to contract price, will be calculated by multiplying three (3) times to cost of materials. Terms of Payment: 50% of contract price due upon signing contract: $ 1400.00 ;;_c of contract price clue upon final completion. $1400.00 Ron bell. Inc. is fully certified and complies with all the requirements of the State of Florida Construction Industry Licensing Board. Upon receipt of signed contract and written request by you, we will issue an insurance certificate for your review and files. In no event shall Ron Bell, Inc. be liable for any special, incidental or consequential damages to the building or its contents resulting from, or in connection with, any failure or leak. It it t;ccomes Iiecessary for either party to institute an action at iatt or ine i' :" enforce any obligation hereunder then the prevailing party shall be recover attorney's f e,s and court costs. Unpaid accounts kill be subject to a late charge of 1.5.. per mono. p refers Unpaid t�• accounts that .la riot tollow the terms in this contract. 0 7 3 7 - 7 5 0 7 33E North C d i ' 'e Highway L c. Beach. F tonca 3.3483 Stare Roofing Contractors i_ic. Contract Documents Mrs. Rudderman 701 N. E. 3rd. Avenue Delray Beach, Fl. 33-44 May 10. 1994 Description of Building: Residence Delray Beach, Florida Scope of Work: Work confined to all sloped roof areas on above described residence. Description of Work: A. Remove existing sloped roofing completely from the wood deck to allow for a smooth application of the new roofing system. * (see decayed wood contingency on page #2 of this contract) B) Install a 30 lb. organic felt on sloped roof using nails through tin caps in full accordance with state and local building department requirements. C) Install 26 gauge galvanized, drip edge flashing at perimeter of sloped roof. D) Install new lead plumbing stack flashings and galvanized roof vents to replace existing. E) Supply and install light-weight, 3-tab, fiberglass reinforced, fungus resistant asphalt shingles on sloped roof area. F) Price includes all permits, licenses and fees. G) Clean up and haul away all debris. I' i;1iSprocess have appropriate product Ictapproval :�1.1 _--tai,:l and I7 I�.i 1 bylocal city and authorities and all work complies to the latest edition of the Standard 1- Code for a replacement roof. MEMORANDUM TO: HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMBERS, FOR THE MEETING OF MAY 18, 199 FROM: PAT CAYCE,�ISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER SUBJECT: PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT TO LDR SECTION 4. 1.4, USES OF LOTS OF RECORD Please read the attached staff report to the Planning & Zoning Board. Basically it states that, with the exception of the R-1-A zoning district, all adjoining lots of record which are under the same ownership shall not be developed if the total frontage and total lot area do not meet the requirements of the zoning district in which they are located. This text amendment will go before the P & Z Board on May 16, 1994 for recommendation to the City Commission. If the text amendment is recommended by P & Z and approved by the City Commission it will have the effect of requiring variances to be granted by the HPB from Section 4 .3.4 to allow the approval of COA's 8-226 and 8-227 . Without a variance both -__ of these applications would be void by the fact that the adjoining lots are under the same ownership and do not meet the minimum development standards. Therefore, staff has added a condition of approval to these COA's that variances must be granted by the HPB before building permits can be issued. Additionally, if the text amendment is approved, all future development of adjoining lots of record under the same ownership which do not meet the minimum of Section 4 .3.4 and are located within historic districts, with the exception of the R-1-A zoning district, will require variances before a COA can be approved. This is the same procedure that is currently employed by the HPB; the public hearing is conducted and if the variance is granted the COA review follows at the same meeting so that the two hearings are concurrent. • PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT MEETING OF: MAY 16, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: V.D. LDR AMENDMENT TO SECTION 4. 1.4, USES OF LOTS OF RECORD • ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD: The item before the Board is that of recommending to the City Commission approval of an amendment to the LDRs concerning the use of nonconforming lots of record. BACKGROUND: This LDR amendment was initiated by the Board at its meeting of March 16, 1994, in response to concerns raised by residents of the Lake Ida neighborhood. Building permits were issued for the construction of three homes on platted lots which do not meet current minimum standards for frontage and lot area. As a result, the homes are not consistent with the general character of the neighborhood. LDR Section 4 . 1.4, Use of Lots of Record, allows for the use of lots of record which do not meet current minimums, subject to certain criteria. A home may be constructed on a substandard platted lot, provided that it has at least 50 feet of frontage. There is no requirement that adjacent lots that are in common ownership be combined in order to meet the minimum standards . The lots in the Lake Ida neighborhood are owned by the same person. If the City had regulations which required that the lots be developed in a manner which complies with current codes, only one house could have been built on the combined properties. Alternatively, the owner could have . applied for a replat of the property to create two lots, one of which would not meet minimum frontage requirements for a corner lot (creation of the nonconforming lot would have required special permission by the City Commission) . Instead, three homes are being constructed. Regulations which require the combining of commonly owned substandard lots are not uncommon. The cities of Boynton Beach, Stuart, and Highland Beach have such provisions in their codes . Staff reviewed those ordinances prior to drafting one which would fit within our existing regulations . ANALY SIS : � The proposed amendment (copy attached) would continue to allow for the use of substandard lots of record as currently permitted, provided that the lots are in single ownership. V.D. Planning and Zoning Board Staff Report LDR Amendment Re: Nonconforming Lots of Record Page 2 However, when substandard adjacent lots are under common ownership, and the combining of the lots results in a parcel which meets minimum frontage and minimum area requirements, then those lots must be developed in accordance with those minimums . Ownership would be that which is on. record at the date that the ordinance is passed. The R-1-A zoning district has been specifically excluded from this ordinance. The 60 ' minimum frontage required in the R-1-A district is not significantly greater than the 50 ' minimum required for development on substandard platted lots. Also, if the restriction were to apply to R-1-A zoning, infill housing opportunities would be reduced. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, recommend to the City Commission approval of the attached amendment to LDR Section 4 . 1.4, Use of Lots of Record. Attachments : * Proposed ordinance Report prepared by Diane Dominguez T:P Z NCLOT.DOC Section 4 . 1.4 Use of Lots of Record: Any lot, or parcel, of record which qualifies as a lot of record as set forth in these regulations, but which does not comply with respect to minimum lot area and minimum lot dimensions specified for the zoning district in which it is located, may nevertheless be used (for purposes as allowed in that zoning district) , as long as it complies with all other requirements felt of that zoning district, tit$ t6XX6s144 6gt6tti6A01 subject to the following limitations: (A) Duplex and multiple family structures may not be constructed on a lot which has an area 6f less than that provided for as the minimum lot area within the zoning district. (B) A residential structure shall not be constructed on any lot, within a residential zoning districtd, which has A frontage of less than fifty feet (50' ) . (C) H6O6t¢ti 'WOW tMi $t6tUUi661 &6t 441 (inlet Pt6ii$164 6t thdid thaXX Ot6t6sit t6ttttttti6t 6t 4 A residential structure may be constructed on a Single Family Lot (or Parcel) of Record which conforms with all other aspects of minimum lot size requirements but which has no frontage. Further, such a Lot of Record with no suitable access may achieve private access for a single family residence and similar uses by means of a nonpublic (private) access easement. (D) Except in the R-1-A zoning district, if two (2) or more adjoining lots (or combination of lots and portions of lots) of record are under the same ownership at the time of passage or amendment of this ordinance, and if the total frontage and the total area is equal to or greater than that which is required by the zoning district regulations, said property shall not be developed except in accordance with the mininum frontage and lot area requirements of the district. Ownership shall be determined by the property tax rolls on file in the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser's Office as of the effective date of this ordinance. T:NCLOTS .DOC } STAFF REPORT HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING MAY 18, 1994 AGENDA ITEM IV-E COA 8-224 354 N.E. 1st Avenue, contributing residence Old School Square Historic District Susan Cross, Owner. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is that of approval for COA 8-224 to allow construction of an attached garage, handicapped access ramp and driveway to the rear of the property in conjunction with the rehabilitation of a single family residence. BACKGROUND The Mission style single family residence was constructed in 1925. It is wood frame with stucco exterior and contains many of its original architectural features. The property was recently purchased by Susan Cross, owner of the Christmas Shop. Ms . Cross currently plans to use the house as a residence and at a later date convert it to commercial use. Before the commercial use is established it will be necessary for her to obtain Site Plan approval and this will come to the Board for review at a later date. ANALYSIS OF THE PROJECT The garage addition is 20 ' X 25 ' and will be stuccoed to match the finish of the house. The roof line of the garage will match the existing roof line of the house. The garage door will face the alley (west) and a window and door will be added to the south. The north elevation will have a handicapped ramp which leads to an existing rear entrance to the main house. The handicapped ramp elevation showing a standard pipe railing has been superseded by a very appropriate and attractive masonry wall which will be stuccoed to match the house. The garage will be accessed from the improved alley to the west. The driveway and guest parking area adjacent to the alley will have a pearock surface. In addition to lot 15 on which the existing building is located, the applicant owns the two adjacent lots to the south (lots 16 & 17, please see the survey for clarification) . She plans to construct a single family residence on the south portion of the property at a later date. When this construction occurs the applicant will replat the three lots into two; the south lot will be 69 ' wide and the north lot will be 88 ' wide. The plot plan for the garage addition is prepared for an 88 ' wide lot, the actual lot is 57 .2 ' wide. Therefore, a unity of title joining lots 15 and 16 will be necessary before a building permit can be issued for COA 8-224 . Before construction of the new house to the south commences, the applicant will officially replat lots 15, 16 & 17 into 2 lots. When the lots are replatted the unity of title between lots 15 & 16 will be released. ALTERNATIVE ACTION 1. Approve COA 8-224 based on positive findings to Section 4 .5. 1(E) with the following condition: That Lots 15 and 15 of Block 65 be joined by Unity of Title before a building permit is issued. 2 . Deny COA 8-224 based on a failure to make positive findings to Section 4 .5 . 1(E) . RECOMMENDED ACTION 1 . Approve COA 8-224 based on positive findings to Section 4 .5. 1(E) with the following condition: That Lots 15 and 15, of Block 65 be joined by Unity of Title before a building permit is issued. 1 l(.(J. ) . I f l i1.2. ' ('I'I. - ) - ' •.l ..fir i aZ O O Z Z I a° a . n F. . • --- 15 7. 23 P 157. 7 .� lit A _1 .f'-� •- :4?� • -� *I ,t!. I Qo x so� r- • . . a 'A ' ri • Is -I, _!_ so. . _� —57..•r- .:.r�. ..- --\ I z 7 r 0 0 r '. ,milrowombri i Rl 7 IT in le `� 70.% u �zs - U) Pt& y .- to t 0 i m I c 0 0 , t Ln w t �► J n ` N 0 i m 4 7 , ,z.0 to Ely it 20.7• _ 1L:`J io.s rig . o 1 o- _ � c • b m ; -- —C\ it _ t I I L*AVE. —I ..... ) •l 1 1 4 1. 1 1 I. ik.,\‘' i . ‘ % \ I . , •. ii • i --..-_.. • .. __ . 10- • ,...--.. -. . •- .. 111 . . .... -__,_, ...-(4,--„...,- , . - 4i ....----- . • . _ • . . . _ ' - . _ __. ....... - -- - . --- _ 1 _- ..• ,V" ------.--r"?...`- '.., ---V.'•.- -.° ..--..ica, _ - . . 1...- 1 1 STAFF REPORT HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING MAY 18, 1994 AGENDA ITEM IV-F COA 8-225 160 Marine Way, contributing residence Marina Historic District Claudia & Stephen Echols, Owner, or Francisco Perez, Architect Agent. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is that of granting approval for COA 8-225 to allow construction of a second story addition to the existing residence. ANALYSIS This is an appropriate and attractive addition to a very small contributing single family residence. The existing free standing guest house to the rear of the principal residence will remain and will be connected to the to the main house by the second floor addition. The front gable of the second floor addition repeats the original first floor gable and the trellis pavilion on the roof is set back 32 ' from the front facade of the original house. Elevations, floor plans and finishing schedule are attached and fully explain the proposed addition. The Chief Building Official has reviewed the plans and has approved the second floor addition to the nonconforming setback of the south wall as it does not add to the footprint of the nonconformity. ALTERNATIVE ACTION 1. Approve COA 8-225 by making positive findings to Section 4.5 . 1(E) . 2. Deny COA 8-225 by failing to make positive findings to Section 4 .5 . 1(E) with reasons stated. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1 . Approve COA 8-225 by making positive findings to Section 4 . 5 . 1(E) . DATE: May 10, 1994 TO: Patricia Cayce Historic Preservation Planner City of Delray Beach 100 N.W. 1st Avenue Delray Beach, Florida FROM: Francisco E. Perez-Azua API Group INC. Architecture 111 East Palmetto Park Road Boca Raton, Florida 33432 Finish Schedule for Echols House: Walls White stucco finish to match existing construction. Windows Vinyl clad wood windows, front elevat on will gmost likely awning. Windows on the be double-hung to match existing construction. Side and rear window may be a combination of the types mentioned, designed so as to maintain the overall historic character of the existing house. Doors Wood french doors, painted white, to match existing construction. Glass Clear, to match existing construction. Shutters Wood, operable, painted yellow to match existing construction. Trellis/trims Wood, painted white, to match existing trellis. Roof Standing seam metal roof, light grey Stairs/railings Wood, painted white. 0 , • • 4. - • ,e }ate i K ; i. f' t t' • _ ' " e _ _. 1 t j,„ t' . . mom --- _ _ • I �,� �{! ► ' -r:.Y+:'.!«At `f.. r., tisa.. .n• { i 'i: ,;vim, • roi . -1..:,*."'"•..?...-:•A- '.: S\ ' ‘It - -._ -',. '-i, Apr,,..._:„.....-., -,,, Y:• •••*ds-11..... w• ,{4... • "Sr..- v , �. yk _.4••.0, ^''-1 f,.g. .- i A'_• a�ig.. ..+ �-. ,may. ' , ; • Yp ,r,... r•r. 4e _, __ • - • -. STAFF REPORT HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING MAY 18, 1994 AGENDA ITEM IV-G COA 8-226 Lot 13, a vacant lot adjacent to the north property line of 160 Marine Way, Marina Historic District. Claudia & Stephen Echols, Owner, Francisco Perez, Architect agent. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is that of approval for COA 8-226 to allow new construction of a single family residence. BACKGROUND This residence is proposed for Lot 13 which is a vacant lot to the north of the Echols residence, 160 Marine Way. The lot is 50 ' x 143 ' with a total of 7, 150 s . f. It is located in the RM zoning district which requires a minimum lot size of 8,000 s . f. The lot is currently a lot of record which means that it was platted before these development requirements were adopted and is therefor a buildable lot. However, new construction can not occur on lots of record which are adjacent and are under common ownership until the text amendment to Section 4 . 1.4, which is described in the attached memorandum, is approved or denied. If the amendment is approved this lot will require a variance from Section 4 .3.4(K) Development Standards, with respect to minimum lot size before building permits can be issued. ANALYSIS This is an appropriate design for the Marina Historic District. It is consistent with the criteria for new construction. The attached elevations, floor plans and finishing schedule fully explain the development. ALTERNATIVE ACTION 1 . Approve COA 8-226 based on positive findings to Section 4 .5. 1(E) with the following condition: If a variance from Section 4 .3.4(K) is required it must be approved by the Historic Preservation Board before building permits are issued. 2 . Deny COA 8-226 based on a failure to make positive findings to Section 4.5. 1(E) with the reasons stated. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Approve COA 8-226 based on positive findings to Section 4 .5 . 1(E) with the following condition: If a variance from Section 4 . 3.4 (K) is required it must be approved by the Historic Preservation Board before building permits are issued. • DATE: May 10, 1994 TO: Patricia Cayce Historic Preservation Planner City of Delray Beach 100 N.W. 1st Avenue Delray Beach, Florida FROM: Francisco E. Perez-Azua API Group INC. Architecture 111 East Palmetto Park Road Boca Raton, Florida 33432 Finish Schedule for house on Lot 13 Marine Way: Walls White stucco finish. Windows Vinyl clad wood windows, casement, fixed, double-hung, and/or awning. Combination of window types will be designed so as to match and maintain the overall historic character of the existing house on lot 14 Marine way. Doors Wood french doors, painted white. Glass Clear. Shutters Wood, operable. Color to be selected by owner. Trellis/trims Wood, painted white. Roof Standing seam metal roof, light grey Driveway Gravel, to match existing driveway on lot 14 Marine way. Colors may vary as per owner request. Any changes will be presented to the board at the meeting on May 18. ,1� io�1 fvavo /�f , I ...7:" ot/lrs'rACf w -- ., 1 lvt^ d....4„ a.v,/Aar a 0 `Q r I • Nti 1 Jo ' 1— -- _ -- --- --- , .Q O —._ f \v 7 Q ! 1' if/ V �1 11 I."74•! O— `i-- ,P o c 4' 1 h �1 PmlF✓ ,, f�`P .1 / o i Li r v IL9 /2.0'a. ... \Ts r 1 l \ `A N. e v` ` ~ Z,S �1 v ne% A_ ..� 33.9' ►. ll� \ !. v I 3t.S' i 70.5' � 11./' *-S OA,' 1 rt V tL IL �'1 . I.j '0% k'k w` N o ��� �.. 3� ° ....‘,....N. N. i \' . V , a I MO,V AIEW7 h ST •,/ fer 4rcdoN /.¢3 DOS FilE� wW✓C.IP _ti� rlGi°f4l ytB 353 Amer 0 . ) . _________ . l'ABL f f✓ .. E. z" 97-,--Toz-E-7---f— „.,„.., v 111111 . \ . - * .JESC', /A'7 Div'' �L'�f��.r,.�s SvKGry i'r5 /3, 7.4( A,['O/5, A SUB'/V/s/O/t/ ,1,. I-Ai€5 5Tc,°, fx/ie. revois OF 6c 'c A'/16, Oe-t.PAs Ftae/OA, ACc', 7O/,vc re, T,;'E PLAT 7;4/.!.--2cF QEC'OQOE' /4.7 f Z'rZADD.!' /7, ',1st 4e 1 arse, ctr.:FT t•a the vla .ho.n hereon I. • tr... . OC/We ,4'(/BI/C ' a ' 'c 0,,,,,9z,0 rope•••r:.: c, of . .•: of u,• Isola cf..crlOw:h•r•on. inc ••rnrn•n<• •itn t'• einlm.Jn t•ohnlc•I Ft•ni•ra• for Ian:: . ,.•On9 BE4e',4/ L'OGSy'f; FtO,Q/OA. • In th. s:•:• . _ ..i i,.. .. .•I fo,tn cr c .ct.r Iua-e F _ • IIC.1trc . .‘"7///‹.<"4731,4,'"_7. FZoo0 zovf-: ,se- EL 7 O'BRIEN, SUITER & O'BRIEN, INC. ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, LAND PLANNERS 2601 NORTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY, DELRAY DEACH, FLORIDA Lai 4le. /992 era• er,.e./..,24• MG Gov "'•'•_92-/Mai STAFF REPORT HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING MAY 18, 1994 AGENDA ITEM IV-H COA 8-227 Lot 19, a vacant lot adjacent to the west property line of the Stone residence, 102 N.E. 8th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District. Mr and Mrs William Stone, Owners. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is that of granting approval of COA 8-227 to allow the new construction of a single family home. BACKGROUND This residence is proposed for Lot 19 which is a vacant lot to- the north of the Stone residence, 102 N.E. 8th Street. The lot is 50 ' x 120 ' with a total of 6,000 s.f. It is located in the R-1-AA zoning district which requires a minimum lot size of 9,500 s.f. The lot is currently a lot of record which means that it was platted before these development requirements were adopted and is therefor a buildable lot. However, new construction can not occur on lots of record which are adjacent and are under common ownership until the text amendment to Section 4 . 1.4, which is described in the attached memorandum, is approved or denied. If the amendment is approved this lot will require a variance from Section 4 .3.4(K) Development Standards, with respect to minimum lot size before building permits can be issued. ANALYSIS This is a single family two story residence with a guest cottage in the rear. It will have a stucco finish, Spanish "S" tile roof, white aluminum windows, wood entry doors and wood garage doors. With the exception of the garage location, the spacing and use of aluminum for the windows on the front facade, and the "S" tiles for the roofing material, it is generally consistent with the criteria for new construction. The Building Department Plan Reviewer has determined that the guest cottage cannot be attached to the main house as it must be an accessory structure. If the guest cottage is to retain its complete kitchen, the applicant will need to remove the connecting roof between the two buildings. However a canvas awning may be installed to give protection from the weather. ALTERNATIVE ACTION 1. Continue with direction. 2. Approve COA 8-226 as presented based on positive findings to Section 4 .5. 1(E) with the following conditions : A.That the connecting roof between the guest cottage and the main house be removed, and B. If a variance from Section 4 .3.4(K) is required it must be approved by the Historic Preservation Board before building permits are issued. 3. Approve COA 8-226 based on positive findings to Section 4.5. 1(E) with the following conditions: A. That the front windows be spaced evenly and be of wood rather than the proposed aluminum. B. That barrel tile rather than the proposed "S" tile be used. C. That the connecting roof between the guest cottage and the main house be removed, and D. If a variance from Section 4 . 3.4(K) is required it must be approved by the Historic Preservation Board before building permits are issued. 4 . Deny COA 8-226 based on a failure to make positive findings to Section 4.5. 1(E) with the reasons stated. RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Approve COA 8-226 based on positive findings to Section 4.5. 1(E) with the following conditions: A. That the front windows be spaced evenly and be of wood rather than the proposed aluminum. B. That barrel tile rather than the proposed "S" tile be used. C. That the connecting roof between the guest cottage and the main house be removed, and D. If a variance from Section 4 . 3.4(K) is required it must be approved by the Historic Preservation Board before building permits are issued.