Loading...
HPB 06-05-1996 A tit?'RnY BEAN bletrg All-America II� Ier 1993 AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: June 5, 1996 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: 1st Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respeQt to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing,such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286.0105. I. CALL TO ORDER • II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • May 15, 1996 III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. COA 8-263 Continuation: Architect's Office, Ames Design Group, 203 Dixie Boulevard, Contributing Structure, Del-Ida Park Historic District. Shane Ames, Owner. Approval for a Minor Site Plan Modification Which Incorporates: • Site Plan • Landscape Plan • Design Elements B. COA 8-274 Pre-application: Check Cashing Store, 48 West Atlantic Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. Paul Hauser Owner, William Nolte', Authorized Agent. New Construction HPB Meeting June 5, 1996 Page 2 IV. DISCUSSION AND ACTIONS ITEMS A. Recommend to the Planning and Zoning Board that a Parking Lot Associated with the Redevelopment of Block 60 be Approved for Recommendation to the City Commission as a Conditional Use in the OSSHAD Zoning District. V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Reports from Historic District Representatives B. Board Members C. Staff VI. ADJOURN Pat Cayce Historic Preservation Planner POSTED ON: May 30, 1996 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING DATE: JUNE 5, 1996 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM I. ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 6:00 P.M. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Vaughan, John Johnson, Debora Turner, Pat Healy-Golembe, Susan Hurlbut MEMBERS ABSENT: Julie Morgan, Vera Farrington STAFF PRESENT: Pat Cayce II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The Minutes for the Regular Meeting of May 15, 1996 were before the Board for consideration. Ms. Hurlburt moved to approve the Minutes as presented. The motion was seconded by Ms. Golembe and passed by a vote of 5-0. It was moved by Mr. Johnson, seconded by Ms. Turner and passed 5-0 to hear Item IV.A. first. IV. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS: A. Recommend to the Planning and Zoning Board that a Parking Lot Associated with the Redevelopment of Block 60 be Approved for Recommendation to the City Commission as a Conditional Use in the OSSHAD Zoning District. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of recommending to the Planning and Zoning Board that a Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) parking lot in Block 60 be approved as a conditional use in the Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD). It was moved by Ms. Turner, seconded by Ms. Golembe and passed 5-0 to recommend to the Planning and Zoning Board that a parking lot located at Lot 3, the North 49.4 feet of Lot 4, and the North 49.4 feet of Lot 10, Block 60 be approved as a conditional use in the OSSHAD Zoning District. III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: A. COA 8-263 Continuation: Architect's Office; Ames Design Group; 203 Dixie Boulevard; Contributing Structure; Del-Ida Park Historic District; Shane Ames, Owner. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of approving a COA which incorporates the following aspects of a minor site plan modification, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(1)(b): • Site Plan • Landscape Plan • Design Elements It was moved by Ms. Turner, seconded by Ms. Golembe and passed 5-0 to approve the use of gravel for the proposed additional parking space as illustrated on the site plan for COA 8-263 Continuation. It was moved by Ms. Turner, seconded by Ms. Golembe and passed 5-0 to approve COA 8-263 Continuation for the site plan modification for Ames Design Group International based upon positive findings to Chapter 3 and Section 2.4.5(G)(5) of the Land Development Regulations, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to the following condition: • That if the applicant wishes to convert the second floor from residential to office, a site plan modification must be processed. It was moved by Ms. Turner, seconded by Ms. Golembe and passed 5-0 to approve COA 8-263 Continuation for the landscape plan for Ames Design Group International based upon positive findings pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.16. It was moved by Ms. Golembe, seconded by Ms. Hurlbut and passed 5-0 to approve COA 8-263 Continuation for the design elements for Ames Design Group International based upon positive findings to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E) and 4.6.18. Note: Due to lack of clarity on the site plan, the Board recommended that the Building Department take special note of the design of the sloped walkway (handicapped access ramp) to be sure it meets the ADA specifications. -2- 06/05/96 B. COA 8-274 Pre-Application: Check Cashing Store; 48 W. Atlantic Avenue; Old School Square Historic District; Paul Hauser, Owner; William Nolte!, Authorized Agent. Item Before the Board: The action requested of the Board is that of a pre- application review for site plan and design. The site plan which was submitted with the pre-application incorporated most of the components discussed at the meeting of March 20, 1996. The Planning staff had the following comment with respect to the 7' wide interior walkway to the east of the building: • That the sidewalk to the east of the building be reduced to 5' in width; and that it be located as far to the east as possible. The remaining 2'+ of open area along the east elevation is to be planted with foundation plantings. The building plans are in the Art Moderne style which is compatible to the architecture found along Atlantic Avenue. The Board recommended that the applicant proceed with the plans as presented and submit a formal application to the Planning Department. Staff pointed out that the revised plans had not been reviewed by the CRA or the WAARC. Both reviews will be necessary before the plans are submitted for a formal COA application to the Historic Preservation Board. VI. REPORTS AND COMMENTS: Chris Brown, Director of the CRA asked permission to address the Board at this time. Mr. Brown stated that at the last CRA Board meeting a City Commissioner and some of his Board members expressed concern with inappropriate alterations within historic districts. Mr. Brown questioned what the Board approves and what is approved at staff level; he feels that there is a deterioration of the design elements which the Board is tasked to enforce. Mr. Brown stated that he has discussed this with Board member John Johnson and that they have identified six or seven properties which have been inappropriately altered. Mrs. Cayce pointed out that a number of alterations are performed without permits and are therefore not approved by staff or the Board. Chairman Vaughan suggested that a workshop be held to discuss the situation further and recommended that Board members submit a list of concerns so that a workshop agenda could be established with the appropriate City officials participating. A. Reports from Historic District Representatives None -3- 06/05/96 B. Board Members After discussion the Board members recommended designating the following buildings: • The Cathcart Building (Sal's Sport Shop) • The Arcade Tap Room • Ellwood's Barbecue • Powers Lounge • The FEC Train Station • The Barwick Building C. Staff None VII. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business before the Board, Ms. Turner moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:30 P.M., seconded by Ms. Golembe and passed 5-0. The undersigned is the Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for June 5, 1996, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on June 19, 1996. Diana Mund If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. -4- 06/05/96 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: June 5, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: III.A. ITEM: Consideration of COA 8-263 Continuation which incorporates the minor site plan modification, landscape plan, and design elements for Ames Design Group International, located at the northeast corner of NE 2nd Avenue and Dixie Boulevard. 41/ a.. , -Q+ 1 .lI :iiiiiii: L: 6TM ST. GEORGE -- - ♦ 60ULEVARp ...rimming ♦♦♦♦� N.E. 7TH CT. -� � / i ♦♦ N.E. Q 7Th Si� N.E.6TH ST. .. ♦ ♦ Zz e 416 +64 a, J _iJ --) 1 I 0, 6s. = O ♦hi:1111111N ♦ N.E TH TERR. N.E. 6TH ST. Mf00D LANE Z ` _ __ MI 111111ffN.E. 5114 CT. - - Li I ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 GENERAL DATA: Owner/Agent Shane Ames Ames Design Group International Location Northeast corner of NE 2nd Avenue and Dixie Boulevard. Property Size 0.32 acres Future Land Use Map Transitional Current Zoning RO (Residential Office) Adjacent Zoning North: RO East: RO South: RO West: R-1-AA (Single Family Residential) Existing Land Use Existing single family residence with associated parking and landscaping. Proposed Land Use Construction of a 486 sq.ft. second floor addition to accommodate a residence with the first floor to be converted from residential to offices for an architectural firm, along with the installation of associated parking and landscaping improvements. Water Service Existing on site. Sewer Service Existing on site. III.A. The item before the Board is that of approval of COA 8-263 which incorporates the following aspects of a minor site plan modification for Ames Design Group International (203 Dixie Boulevard), pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(1)(b): ❑ Site Plan; ❑ Landscape Plan; and ❑ Design Elements. The subject property is located at the northeast corner of N.E. 6th Street and N.E. 2nd Avenue, adjacent to Dixie Boulevard, and contains approximately 0.32 acre. The subject property consists of Lots 11 and 12, Block 11, Del-Ida Park subdivision, and is located within the Del-Ida Park Historic District. The existing two-story single family residence is historically contributing and was constructed in 1925 in the Mission Revival style. The structure is of frame construction with a stucco finish and rests on a concrete foundation. Additions have altered its original rectangular form and most of its decorative elements have been removed. However, its original porch, though enclosed with metal jalousies, and porte cochere remain intact. At its meeting of November 1, 1995, the Historic Preservation Board approved COA 8-263 for the project which included changes to architectural elevations and building renovations. On December 5, 1995, the Historic Preservation Board approved COA 8-263 relating to the site plan and additional changes to the building elevations for Ames Design Group International (architect's office). The landscape plan was continued and approved by the Board at its meeting of February 7, 1996. The development proposal incorporated the following: ❑ Conversion of the single family residence to an architect's office; ❑ Installation of seven gravel parking spaces and a paved handicap space with paved drive aisles; ❑ Installation of associated landscaping and refuse storage areas; and, 0 Installation of a handicap ramp and fire escape. HPB Staff Report Ames Design Group International - COA 8-263 (Minor Site Plan Modification) Page 2 The current development proposal is to construct a 486 sq.ft. second floor addition and utilize the second floor as a residence along with the installation of an addition gravel parking spaces in the front yard. The proposal is now before the Board for action. :<:>:>::>:<:>:>:;«;;;::::;::>::>:::<:::><;;::;;;:::::<::;::: IKROMMINNINORIEKTIUNIEIBEEMBEEE The project involves a minor site plan modification to the recently approved site plan for Ames Design Group International (architectural firm). The current development proposal incorporates the following: ❑ Construction of a 486 sq.ft. second floor addition and utilization of the second floor as a residence; ❑ Conversion of the first floor to an architect's office; ❑ Installation of one additional gravel parking space; and, ❑ Reconfiguration of the handicap ramp and exterior staircase. COMPLIANCE WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. Parking The development proposal approved by the Board on December 6, 1995 was to convert the entire structure to an architect's office which included office space on the first floor (2,326 sq.ft.) with storage on the second floor (608 sq.ft.). The current proposal is to construct a 486 sq.ft. addition to the second floor and utilize the second floor as a residence for a total floor area of 3,420 sq.ft. Pursuant to Section 4.4.17(G)(2), within the RO zoning district, when there is a mix of residential and office, 1 parking space is required for every 400 sq.ft. of floor area. Based upon the above, 9 parking spaces are required which have been provided via the installation of an additional parking space to the previously approved 8 spaces. Employee and visitor parking is separated with employee parking located to the rear of the building and visitor parking located in the front yard. A total of five parking spaces are provided for employees, and four parking • HPB Staff Report Ames Design Group International - COA 8-263 (Minor Site Plan Modification) Page 3 spaces (including one handicapped) for future residents and customers in the front yard. The second floor area as well the entire structure was initially identified as office space which would have required parking to be provided at a rate of 1 parking space per 300 sq.ft. With the proposed 486 sq.ft. addition a total of 12 parking spaces would have been required which could not be provided on the site and there for would have required a variance. The plans have been revised to indicate the second floor as a residence requiring a less restrictive parking requirement of 1 space per 400 sq.ft. To insure that the second floor is not utilized for office space, an affidavit was submitted stating the second floor will be utilized for residential purposes only. If the applicant wishes to convert the second floor from residential to office, a site plan modification must be processed. Front Yard Parking Pursuant to Section 4.4.17(H)(3), with the RO (Residential Office) zone district, all parking for nonresidential principal uses must be located in the side or rear yard or adjacent to an alley. Where there are existing buildings, administrative relief [ref. LDR Section 2.4.7(D)(5)] may be sought provided it is determined that compliance with these regulations is not feasible and that the residential character of the area will be maintained, and that such area shall be substantially screened from off-premises view by, at least, a 4 foot high hedge. Required Findings: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(D)(5), prior to granting administrative relief, the administrative official (Director of Planning and Zoning) shall make the following findings: (a) That the relief sought is consistent with the specific authorization provided for in these regulations; (b) That the intent of the affected regulation is preserved; and, (c) That the action will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. The applicant has submitted a letter requesting a waiver to permit an additional parking space in the front yard. With the site plan approval of December 5, 1995, front yard parking was approved which consisted of 2 gravel parking spaces and one paved handicap parking space. HPB Staff Report Ames Design Group International - COA 8-263 (Minor Site Plan Modification) Page 4 The 486 sq.ft. addition will necessitate the provision of an additional parking space in the front yard. Given the location of the building on the site, it is not possible to locate the additional parking space in the rear yard. As the site has a number of mature trees in the front yard, and a landscape buffer is to be provided around the perimeter of the site, the front yard parking area will not negatively impact surrounding properties. The City Engineer has reviewed and has no objection to this request. Based on the above, the Director of Planning and Zoning granted administrative relief to allow the provision of an additional space in the front yard. Parking Surface Pursuant to Section 4.6.9(D)(8)(a), parking lots and spaces on historic sites and within historic districts may be improved with a surface material other than pavement, where there are 12 or fewer parking spaces, subject to approval by the Historic Preservation Board. The proposed additional parking space in the front yard will be gravel, which is consistent with the approved parking surface, with the exception of the driveway aisle and the handicap accessible parking space, which are to be asphalt. The gravel space will be in keeping with the historic character of the property and will not damage the roots of the existing trees. Thus, staff recommends approval of the request. The previously approved landscape plan is not being significantly altered. No additional landscape material is being provided or removed, except for sod to accommodate the gravel parking space. The removal of the sod does not affect the landscape or open space requirements which have been exceeded throughout the site. With the exception of the exterior stairway and the exterior paint colors, all of the design elements for this development were approved by the Historic Preservation Board on November 1, 1995. The Board approved the exterior stairway and the paint colors at its meeting of December 5, 1996. The exterior paint colors consist of Mellow Mood, Pavilion Blue, and Victorian Mahogany. The exterior stairway will be constructed of pressure treated wood and painted Victorian Mahogany. The proposed addition will be consistent with the previously approved design elements. The major design changes to the approved elevations are as follows: HPB Staff Report Ames Design Group International -COA 8-263 (Minor Site Plan Modification) Page 5 Front Elevation The front elevation is improved with the second floor addition, as the exterior staircase will be moved to the side (east) elevation and will be less visible from the street. Two windows will be added to the upper right wall which balances the previously approved facade. Rear Elevation Three windows and a door will be added to the second floor. Two second floor deck additions with balustrades will compliment the parapets of the first floor. The exterior stair case will be accessed from the rear. East Elevation The addition will be extended to the north and will be constructed over a portion of the first floor flat roof. A single window will be reconfigured to a double window, two additional windows and a door will be added to the second floor east wall. The exterior staircase, second floor deck and associated railing are to be placed to the rear of the east elevation. West Elevation With the removal of the exterior staircase, the French doors will be replaced with windows. A row of clerestory windows will be placed on the west wall of the second floor addition. ::.»::::>::::>::>:::>::::>::>::::>;:::>::::::>::::>:::<::;:::::::::>:>::>::>::>:<.:<:.............. :: .:t.l..l..R..t .. ......F..t..l ..l .:t:..l . .. ...................:..:::::::::::.................................. Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to the Future Land Use Map, Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency, and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations. At the time of site plan approval in December 6, 1995, appropriate findings were made with respect to the Future Land Use Map, Consistency [LDR Section 3.1.1(C) - Standards for Site Plan Actions], Concurrency and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations. HPB Staff Report Ames Design Group International - COA 8-263 (Minor Site Plan Modification) Page 6 The current development proposal involves the construction of a 486 sq.ft. second floor addition and utilization of the second floor as a residence. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(5), this minor modification does not significantly impact the previous findings. However, an analysis with regard to consistency with the Future Land Use Map, Concurrency, and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations as they relate to this development proposal are discussed below. Section 3.1.1(A) - Future Land Use Map (The use and structures must be allowed in the zoning district and the zoning must be consistent with the land use designation). The subject property has a Transitional Future Land Use Map designation, and is zoned RO (Residential Office). The Transitional land use designation is applied to land which is developed, or is to be developed, for either residential or nonresidential uses. The RO zoning is consistent with the Transitional Future Land Use Map designation. The proposal is to provide an office on the first floor and a residence on the second floor. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.17(B), a professional office and a single family residence are allowed as a permitted uses in the RO zone district. Further, LDR Section 4.4.17(H)(2) states that a building or structure in the RO zone district may contain either a residential use, office use, or a mix of uses. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to Future Land Use Map consistency. Section 3.1.1(B) - Concurrency (Pursuant to Section 3.1.1(B) Concurrency as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs of the requested land use and/or development application will not exceed the ability of the City to fund and provide, or to require the provision of, needed capital improvements). The proposed improvements will not have an impact on water and sewer demands. Drainage will not be significantly affected by the installation of an additional gravel parking space adjacent to the handicap ramp. As the existing structure was a residence and the proposal calls for the retention of a residence, there will be no impact on the Parks and Recreation Facilities level of service standard. Concurrency findings as they relate to Streets and Traffic, and Solid Waste are discussed below. Streets and Traffic: Pursuant to Palm Beach County's Traffic Performance Standards, non- residential uses that generate less than 200 gross trips are exempt from providing a traffic study. Based upon the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip HPB Staff Report Ames Design Group International - COA 8-263 (Minor Site Plan Modification) Page 7 Generation Manual, professional office uses generate 34 trips per day/1,000 square feet of office space and single family residences generate 10 trips per day. Thus, the development proposal (2,326 sq.ft. of office + 1 single family residence) will generate 79 total trips. As the existing single family residence has a credit of 10 trips, a total of 69 new trips will result. The traffic generated by this development will not have an adverse impact on the level of service standards for the surrounding roadways. Based upon the above, a positive finding with respect to traffic concurrency can be made. Solid Waste: Pursuant to the Solid Waste Authority's Trash Generation Rates, trash generated each year by the proposed office use will be 5.4 pounds per square foot (6.3 tons per year), and the existing single family residential use generates 1.99 tons per year for a total of 8.29 tons per year. This proposal will result in an increase from the previously approved office use (7.92 tons per year), however, the increase can be easily accommodated by the existing facilities and thus will not be significant with respect to this level of service standard. Section 3.1.1 (D) - Compliance With the Land Development Regulations: As described under the Site Plan Analysis of this report, a positive finding of compliance with the LDRs can be made. Community Redevelopment Agency At its meeting of May 23, 1996, the Community Redevelopment Agency reviewed and recommended approval of the development proposal. • Courtesy Notice A courtesy notice was provided to the Del-Ida Park and Seacrest Homeowner's Associations. Any letters of objection or support, if any, will be presented at the Board's meeting. >:> < »< > ..:..:... . .. ..�.E.�.S.M..E..i+t.T.....A..N..D.....C. :.. ... . The development proposal will be consistent with Chapter 3 of the Land Development Regulations and the Comprehensive Plan. Also, positive findings can also be made with LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(5), that the proposal does not significantly impact the previous findings made at the time of site plan approval on December 5, 1995. It is noted that in the future, if the applicant wishes to HPB Staff Report Ames Design Group International -COA 8-263 (Minor Site Plan Modification) Page 8 convert the second floor from residential to office, a site plan modification must be processed. The proposal will be an enhancement to the surrounding area and retains the residential character which is sought in the RO zone district. ;:::> : :> :: mipaiirmitNzgorimenicemitcysisommommummom 1. Continue with direction. 2. Approve COA 8-263 and the associated minor site plan modification, landscape plan and design elements for Ames Design Group International based upon positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 and Section 2.4.5(G)(5) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, subject to conditions. 3. Deny COA 8-263 and the associated minor site plan modification, landscape plan and design elements for Ames Design Group International with the basis stated. A. Special Action: 1. Approve the use of gravel for the proposed additional parking space as illustrated on the site plan. B. Site Plan Modification: Approve COA 8-263 for the site plan modification for Ames Design Group International based on positive findings pursuant to Chapter 3 and Section 2.4.5(G)(5) of the Land Development Regulations, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to the condition the following condition: 1. That if the applicant wishes to convert the second floor from residential to office, a site plan modification must be processed. C. Landscape Plan: Approve COA 8-263 for the landscape plan for Ames Design Group International based upon positive findings pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.16. HPB Staff Report Ames Design Group International -COA 8-263 (Minor Site Plan Modification) Page 9 D. Design Elements: Approve COA 8-263 for the design elements for Ames Design Group International based upon positive findings to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E) and 4.6.18. Attachments: ❑ Site/Landscape Plan ❑ Building Elevations Report prepared by: Jeff Costello. Senior Planner A.. .I / • ..IA. i'•'''4.• 'tr..L.•,-I '14M1 gZN.N,r✓Ar• '' . .'• . I ,i Mlr• Nt,fao...w►A>4.NM1'I/q,F'4111t L&J` • • ice.___ — — :' 1 d'`� f o!�s 1 \\ {µ-r.� War� 4U fhc i l 1. �Ip+1C o:n1 {I' ar r lwarwt .f •.:-.‘,44,, --(i.,.. ..,.- ... ..."., , • • : . - . t • f -"'6x I Sr7'.F4?' 'r' 1 cM,J ph.rFrifG �S P�svrt x"L kuin , '/V• 33 / ; • .aLh.S r • J ✓. ri) �a,/ ,.do \^\Ipiwvn • `• �, * ti r+N.• t. �•I'^ f NGN.PS/HIi,Y� NrWh�..tr,t l '9J.y"i�A.- . / ^, i1e,�. �,yMt1 „, r 1 1 ••'1. :,_ .r "t:'i�1�, i'e.4.4Ne.r t'�,, 1. �� j• t r Vr \. A(K ` t m,i.+, Y:.✓'Yir ,• i • 0 a. o > r t,l.et I ,°•+�4 y r� iNeh.-( r-. G. .t. /� , AM • J- i(cA.} o.l• S,b 1 io 1 ib apt 1. G�P �• °+,1 \ • �o . •vx✓T,a;1'�1.Olt, 4.iK I n +I•..IZ: rty �y�iq, i 1:rK i : r{.,�1i ;'� Pki•' f/:',,•. •E, / , ,\� • r�f 0 '(1 -I.• •SI •1 ..Ji W �f,�A..Y l 44:..w,a S. Or" •'h ✓c • rC'• .. H�P•F; lSt v t!.:\Vri?? \' •` 0./, Yy• ., 1' . . 0r c - MA .,•."r iQ�yHa, x3:" rt•,E,r� icF :,, V '�• Yam, w' o: • ,Q- . . - ...... .aY..`: s 1"�"a^i:9T ,'GSro .` 't"[ •1�1' . r ns 0. +ii• / !!\-I'1'-47 \ .�' ilai :i`/!: yl: of ir;Yt•; r F lam( I� Ito ''y` _'•yre 4 t t,,,,�.�4 �,4 4rir� . .ti.L,wn.,(a• .i�!r. •� 1 `ice- b i r� 4\. his-Aa- ► i. ..\ ./•• ` .1�1% Y • ` ii5Q. �1r�' '',( , / �+�5'�f r) -j1 1 i. i.i / a +�_t \ lY/ c� �r•. i ''w + ` .. f�1�`�' f�+li7 �rF�fc Yf, �?✓/ a'_._ , 3 t4. : •` 'l ', : A , v �r,�,` , a •4 .: 'ire'. ! w r• ,1-A , W p • }i ♦ • , to O �'zI 'LJ'i•It+f 1• ,,lI'4 (. 9, .44~� C�a��••, 1• :21'•.':• c. .. I ,; 1'N T'v.,t :r•,a c / `a., c , Yi,t� i 66 1 ® :�i 1�L�r e t ct! 3 I •I.4.inJ i',"ki°. .. ;r r`•� `5v�4(l JY 11i � >7�•r i 1\ ! r'„l•• Y✓ /� t<.,...... :. IS'1 .. ��.ey, _ t c 4 r5. • ` i.1',:a - (si<Paa,A,•tKi`�,L�f 1.F \ III _w.u' - 6t, p,l'aks" ,,,, .ti j + f ,` Nt, t•�,• ,,<, •,� S.✓ (,+.T ' • • y Idi y'r .> \ i .c'ei cfl-. i .a •3. ,1 , !,:• ' I ,, ... _ a .1, I • •ri • - •ii 'r J e :41M1 •R ..5, ,4ry�,• •., ?t` II; Aa,..4., - I) Ip vc� vy,y:,r e iw i t✓f• yi• rn r ti: JS fit,s , �' />ir,<s } r ;`� TS• v �\ , \ > i;1' Z i+'• (*- t r > 4'" C (. i t !-, / i '.. ^+'ct \ ,II•\ ...� 1 { i "y �. o r i ��1y. ,�•�rr,�t� C •ati�, q/,,� .ti . ,1�[ ;r i• �C,.,. o.., a�f A i• 11I; , . a '.-, • i r,,, .... u,...f;,,t' •)I� .: 1, ., VN .. �4 y .✓ �i✓^.'-.- •• `�., II� '�. • I I� ' .,. '9.5.-,., ,Aci'-17•1 ��'J • .'% /v'`vF Y y •I A'f d/ t\\i '. 4';M• 4., r.. ~ Gl,,, •.' � ,, .c . e}1+ r ..,,,, 1- T i>... �.:- f• .:{.. \ ..1,>r�rc i�i s> r/i A _ o�/�i :1��, t � t1 'h. i .1' \. 1.'. I L J%� + ,y i: I I •._ � +,��h L 1 Y• ,/�/d� / ! , C 'r-"ti { L•1. ,A((((yyyy�: .i+,.M•.,. \ dJrr.. ....� iFa�i1!d, h{ /.�•i `i Lr .lS;lk,ign..tt �i, 'fl* ;`r4 • ,• :/�.iir.,4 i7.I •x.',", �f r • i i I?41. -1 I n)/ .q `j • ° t'', /. • y;� , is /•.`; .� If ,,.. 1�/1�. p yr W13b"y'}"bi �I?� , .r t r. ; /_%-' t 11! '--,Tay....-....• 0. .'/1:•i Alm , �f N►Jiq /�'r t,fi: •,f ,: �y' + A' �♦ "!^iP r,,, � w 4..-✓ {.*'. (nI — /R,, Y .., �1 -. (1•L.1.,,,t,rfq�+44;,.x, +' ..{l,d ,. .x �-..( 7. V>< r�17 '1', Y/ • • ✓.. \T�f ��Y/!p` ♦; \ tw lrab,tir.)ix�,. t j ��•` i..... � I.,? t1 �,..i � :fir I '/ �� /r fir 4... \, `!t 1 �i ', II - „�, ,I -..N0 4 1,e ,r -nor - =hN r sd,froyd r.,''. .` .fA.�,4 X iyarl \ +,lo•to' .. Py2q \� '`" (..'. :L.... ,•ciLvvl ..w ''' • ' ��t�'���3,�,�� :i. - .. •dr ����//,. • '; '•M'NI ffc%. t, •ntri,.t4u� \..\ , •w�•: " rsdtf del/ � /`. r u�C�1 ` i iv'. ,, iA f ✓, t`jli t \ .�� -} .. i• -ice Y "'� 4 (' r. �'�" '.r.:' .,�rlr,t1'+ �j� _ ��'. , •fir t5 .,�i`I�.,�4 /t r+v'q y - A r ' ,, � 3! i�i,.',...',..• ' •4��� � Y /• ` 11�1i < •.'` J F` _. , If' r it ;;c Zss <. Yj 51 d}�"� • . , . r5 • �. xYlrY�t. 1; , .IF- o•-� a�uar � t 1 •r�i. i \ -.:.a•'a/ :.S ><, >✓ „I ,r ` r •� 1 i \ ZR \ .r���{ I ! �I1• :E •r5 it :'. 7•I 4� •r ,•>I � `•., o,r • . . • , +� `:,.i _ .+ 7LD,,,� <, I, S yti L t CR` c. •f_11. `t• , , aL4r+"�` • ]i' • • • • • ;�. \LL Ll ./. .s, r` -' u•' i t R' a x c LLAP,' 4 , h, r 4 L'. Y' t 4 h �11`w�rl1 1 •L S.` .;;',L..M1 5• . r.1•. '. `•A 4. • f{ '® � , -/ro F • 4r �•> , J • ra` Syr;., 7 >•, y i 'r I'fl �� ! i' 0. 1'• 1i • • f. `.� :i r; ®...:r �f • i >. ,4 t', ,`,}.'• \o r {(:•: r st' .J r�, - ,r,:,,•.15.,a3M.>S, r `jJ»KF Rn[ta, -�:�j { r F xt i • ,rJ< f r , 7l ti . ,. ..r,....r,.?SI,:.AI,m ,l✓:•- Adnf•T ".npa Atilt etx+t+! �;4• - a hYG .'a t,4,; ,,,., .-.- _—' V — - — '1 1 I._ 5i1 /G,f•,__I eAPE WA•✓ . •.. . -- - --- — . • • • 1-6'L"••:•"' re., IL'. -L."./924,-1 - 1..i.'iii•i.:•4. r'1;!•:!:.:':;:••:'-'.: . ..:,G./...:`!..-5:,..:: -;.,. ..:.,.. .... ..... , . . , .. -••• • ' - - ' - - --- - • - - - •••••••••..7-ti7". 777-7-77777.72'.....r: '''', "7•'...: -\ :•••••.:: L'....//---'3 , • .; .. :,•: . •,,\\• •-' ;-: •••. . ‘,..,-...-.•, ....•• ... \ '4—'7 •Y" • ' Ei ..•. .• .. 1211.•.: :•'•'.1. '''.....' IN • . ''' • =:1 ;i: E;%-i /*-- ..--, • • a • :. — .• . • 17. • "' • .'-. --'-/ „...--"-------- • --, . \. . • ' . 11E4 IS" ' r0111 : .= ( ; .M ' 14 1:. - 1, • ,..d, rwre.119er, 12--r-1. 1 ', • • 1 i .. . jae4ps-a4-f..t.y-i.,N____. ._..„), .i. . ion , , 1, . . , ;''.) • \ i 1111 . 61,s. _ ,. . . \ .• ! • 1 ' -- - .- :•.. '.' 1' k...,,i, , •••'. .....•••••'...,'!;;.'•:.'• .. • ...: , . ' . i • r —-,---1-------------H----1---- , . , .. ... • :1_ ::;..; LIM j2.7•', I.•:.L.Atil•-..„._,:,_;...:::,'.'••,:. i'.:,''''''.:';,...• .'.'. ':.....*:: _,..._- , . . ---- .. *.'. .-...: .. . ,.... :: •••"" —. ... ., , ,.,.. : .•,„.. • *.:. . ,. :.--_-: '--. - --------7_ .-..::"'. „_ ...,- -,--.—Q; -_ , . ,, •,.., - . - - __,.../ . . -. ; AII•:•: .,,'•:•"2.II.:,';;;•1... s. .:-.::„..;._ -,---7-;.•-•-•-•.,:--7-.,-,:, :—.7-7-.-7---- ..- , ••'• • . I.:. •II ;.•1•Vt• .•.., :•••...''II•••'•7. ;' ..;.....,..r..•..;.:',...,-sf.Lrt•-tt•••7‘':77-7,-T •--,,' *, : ...• ::...,.:: .2_7--17..-:,:-.--• • --‘• .' . --'----- -•-----•-_ ______ ti,„../ 441,-4 oft-d, ____.\ ;..,„......-.7-'77- :.i...... . .----4*-...,._•-•,'.. •..••••• '•...''..• ' .' •— • •u`•:,.,,•• :.,- ----1-:- . hi:,...'...4 r -N .: i•-•;:x- --,..:,.<7. ti .......,,,.... , -,• R ---- - • . ....,. ,......:f . .......... )... A:- ; . .7 ) „,.1,- • -..,--- , ____, . 1.-- • • [ '-.- • .... ' . ''': ••••••••T'‘• ' •••• . - •-) .' •f '.. 1"!4'• ' •) , i , • . 1 ' • • IL • -.1,.... i , ,_ . 4, 3 e..A.,,g.., f....<4.r. • • •ti :..- '...... s ; 1 =, . • • - ' •, ' • - ---1. '-1--' .+`rarZTql. rq trtirli 'i • .. . . • 1 :• ' .. •:. ,_. .---, .' -- -.... • • •':::./e,..7.7k-.,, ....i. . .. , m.:-..-:_p......, ....,,,..,- c r:-• i-•f•- - • 9-,---`•—•------------'''-"----- . . ,!..-i a..No.,, 1.•2 f•,,.. i..,,,,,_,...1,---...., I I * 11 II Ll IIII. 1:1 il I. .-601.A.,,t,oe.L.o 1-40.," , .I.'•7::•I'•A .,4'7: ••:..•.••:' '• • ..,'•'•II• II,•II• II •::II,•;,,I•I:••••• I . I4,-Lpf-.eAcsi- IP I!' I -L : . . . . • -_. sl'ct,y,.,•'.°WrY4.15g .;i, .. *.. ..,..-'.• . • • .. : • • '.._ 1-1 • --•.-L..1....rf.',ri..411.101..1 5.0.16, • . C== . ______ ”-----1 • / • , * •. i:/,144;;I,Ip : ,..'d.::.f"...':',,'.i.....•''.,...l" , :, .::::....•••(' ',-_- ... .,..,:. • .,...',--,i '..• '-4--, r • _. _ \ . • '''"••:-. •I"Lr.F 10 1;1,4 ) N'-`---i-.__. -1-[.., 0141-1-,,.15r7•16t1(?. c• Eli'-i'le- ,,,-0.2,4;1*-,1•5'_ .., .,..4-•tli°;"4 .•, :, ''.• •: '''.•••• .,::: 'o':,•*,:''', '. ',• • : te-.Q.,4.4.1 2 -e.-!6•-AP:0:. 2 , • :..-0) • .. . • . * I.. ''..' '''..1.1...q".••••;'. -•:•,' ... • c, 1,,,.. % '•i f .,..." :V.P,s..1:,09.lue 141.,t..T.rid .2-4 • . • ' .. • ..! s.,:i;•:•;.::' ...••,:'‘:•.f:•2•'.:i.;, :';';'...' ';:.. - .''•::.:.'':'i;.ss:'''.•;•.•:. "-'- .'''.': ., • - ... -. • - • .. -. ... . • ••:..•. i.:'•::., .:7•••••.:'.:j,:::.•:::.......,::••••...',••::•:•,• 1:•:-.'N.",:-..i..1,•••:: : .....: •••:.i..:•••• •, • •',:: . •. • • . -- --- • . ,ti,' ., 'I.:•.'2,i;,..r.::•, :.•••...t...:,:.. !,;;;:`1:-.;-..- .,. ,...ii,,::,,..':i:::-.1'.i,•,::: ,'"7'. ...'...--.....::1:.••••.::'i•• ••••••: : •..: ... ' ..... • • _L__.-• •.:..::...-••'..------•;:'•11-*= --•:• 4;.:*::' ':ar'-jr.;;••••••'• . '"-"zwit .' rcr-irt— ' .,4•'"Z'fi AT 6 0 . . 7-:--7. ...- -'7777. • -7-. s, *, • .!•.'1: ••••••••••-:'5,,i4A40,1,110177 pi, :' ,0 % 71- .A uv ''•o''''. -.4 ., • ., . ..: • ... •*, • . '. : • ..: ,. ,. '"-' 'I•• ;••':!.3.%''llgA,Nio $iri. , ALL. •..:...:. -,- - . ' • • • i •. • • • ' • , • . • . :'.'14'.:••••••:,•.. , !..,,-:•,.i,,...;,. :....., „..,',..„ . .,. ., • • , :,..•'!., .. ”,7:,.-..;,•-;.., •:;';'''.-...::••• .....• '... . • . • .:•••••;11'...,' • • • • — . I ... • • ; ... •:: . ••7.•'It:•',.:•',...ik •s• 11.•!•••.i••...••• •.'•• II. .1•••••• • • • Oh • : • !.. • • , .• • • .. ..• ,.. • . • • •'•• . ' • •.. , el.. ......•..! : :H.......,;,...,,•::. ....:-." . • . , ••- • . .:. . ...._4------,.. ,- . • , : ,. : :. ..,.............,--. . .• . • -,v7 \ •.. .. . . • • , . •... ., - .----- . .. • . . •• .. ... . . .. . . . . i — '--1-\ . .. •o V.•• . , • l•-•-•\ • —- .• I' • • . • • 1 \ _.....1,...=;41161-1 MMMMMMM MMIM AA M MOIMMitoM MIMM ,... ' • . . ..• •!. •_.--:',*—PirlIIMPIIIMPIP1.11.1111.41108.411.1 MMMMMMM MeMIMM. MMMAppipmpliMA11141111M m......,.......„,...„,..., _ 1 . , • -— • , . • • ' • •••.* '.. .7" • • ., •.• •r.',4":',i....i'''..I" ••' ' '• . ' P d ) • .•:,. . •, I al gi..,.;. ',.;,...; ., ..-::;;•....:,/.3,....,,,...,..-- -•,...f,,...:.,.... _ , 1/ !Nil ,____, • • ; ; Ens Eidmr• .. • :: ,:. .,........ .......r....„.t„,,1411 ..z...,••••„•"• I 1 ...,...la .:. ..,..,. I_: ' • -,• .. . • :,-,--•• -1 -,r4-...,.::•.:,...,:.;..:::...:•:.••,,.....:; ;•!..7.,.., :;,....4i.•., : I ,'••.2• . . • • ••. . . . . . . •. • .! . MI ...:1,.. ..•,'.:V..L.;•,::.:... '•','.'...,".Itl .,•1",,1:.;.' „..,‘i..'• . • 1 ':.':11,_: '„ ,, ......• .. ..-... ' I. • .' _ ' -• :...' ;:,...:'..:';':•::::: tt.tt: ,.,-.'..1:.:•,•i . 1 ——12 .'.:i.. ill-aih.';11111Tifilinhili: 'Aillii11111111111111firl.- . . • . • • •••\ .., u . , .. . :•,•• ....,., -•ts.:,•-ki..:•;,..,. .....,,,„,,..,.,;...,i„1 1 ia...551 , ti.zi,-,iiiii. • •• .' '. •' ____-..:-.. ..:.••1.'‘. .,,,: ...!. ..'.,.. •-..1 .. •• •::::::::.':••••,,,•: •-•irii. ou4• '.. , ..,;,...-.,. WEIL airs • \ . -•-•—••---...----- • -....:....:-------7----7-----T— ri......tionapio.;•:.-• atmitraigic.:L.dtlegmeggril@o....,,,..:••: -77•777;7'I,:11 • •.:: • —11• '', , :..,.....".,.....17..s.........: .. . :„,v.......... . ......:::.-.'..... :111wolt:i.• •:.1.'li......:..:.."...:.i.,,,.:4,...'c.:C.:.,,...•..',. :':611..__ ,..•.'1••;;•i.514':?..tui: 1::."..,.;•..".::.,.....: IL 117 4:71.. . :.r.---N. 1.1-- .1. I.i PI 6, • 1 :N\ --"•••-• ••--"'• • ,,.2=11 %..-1,•-•-.- •••• °M. .., --••• -`-------Pti:!Pr --................................. . . .. . • • .• Mir. -A.a. — ——... , . ....--- • ... - -- ' M--' '1''::.'....... . '. : . ..' . ...: . .... ''..I. P: • ' '•t' qd.,•4•194k. Mel? P."Fat.....1.‘,..•• 1 • • . 'I 7. '." I ! Ir.•!::•,"(.:.1 . .1 ck'. I•••','• •••• I.•••.•• • . ' ••,‘. •. . ••!• • ,,, 7.; • 1 - •• I C•I I ,•'.* .. . - : . ...Nii c ... lc...,...!..,..........:• ,2.:•.„..i.,....J..,;....f• . , . ift ' • • • 1 • --. ..,, .., i .. .•:•. . .........:.0,44.•itz ) . • . . 1 i Pil I : ' ,.• ' •..,. '..• :.''..,11. .,1. •=1..,. 1.11111 ii 1 •• •........., .• . r •.....'• • . , . •'•.'. •::.4;.•'‘L•ri5'',.•r*ie.'11' • • . •• I;,••• •Cr...-,.. .!. . • .• . . 1:•.) 7 ..,..k!,;,::::'..•!;'<0.k,t1,•-•I ..1...!•:•.,. . . •1•4041:4, ....:,•;•••••.!•:i.,,•!;...:•.:::.I'....::••+ :'•', • • ; •'6,6,1•••-rti1(.1460'.. • • " .ii••,::.•••1•.• .,„?..' : ..: .• . NE • • . ..:.rhil!C,:." '••.•‘ •••• •.••••',.'.7.:;',•.•..i..%!,:..4'•.:. ;•••••, I:s::I:4...i' 1 , ;I • ••:,‘ . . •.-- . 1 l •*.I. • '.! I ••••••!!' -l't 1 1111 'I - .1 .'I..II . • 7! • I:I' 1 • 1 '1. --*• • 14 • • ' • . . I.::!&14/1•N I • • . 1•II•• 7 I • IHIIII II . •L'.'. • . te' :I —1-7':: ..... •;;;;:',-2. • "..'-..-:;. •• .. • • ...4q . •••'...;,:,,4•••;••••14••,..,..4,1'••••••••'. ••• ••• '' ' ' •' ......, • . . • ..•• ..• ,..; ..;,p,•;•..4.411.i:44?..04,..itl: •• ••,'. 4.71.4. :sN1rtrtf.r..44. ...'We.tr1.-'.'!,?...... .... '• • . ' kik,111.4! _ . , :'., ' ';..' :'`.. ........,.:::;::;:.•'.''...:•.'•;•',:':•:..''•..',.: • '....;'2.:.• ,..• • . ........v,.1,460vci-W.'10A-frc4l.'6,,e40`. - -'-•-%,.. 7 . . . . / . .. .. :.!..':-..,:...!,, • • • „ . .' :." .. ''.. .......:.•:•••li f;•:;,! i..,!:::..:1, %,!.,*:.• • • •:1,....,• . :.1.,tic-e..DOPrri",•(-.4 4 t.f4-tte•-• ' • •:' ' :, : ". ' ..: .• ..„.•,,•;..:*•,,,:-.:',: ',":',:::;•:q,i,;;7:.,,,,.;,..,,.....?;,.,; •-.,•, !-...• ...;t56-(4.0P fl116ltPc•t%••••,•.•.. .•....,.if,.•....:', • . • . . • • .. . , ••. • • • . • ' • . 7 ' : ,','•": "•.,r•','..,••''''.'".•:1:4""..Ci:•••••••• •,•!'t,''''•:::::•1:::::• ' ' : ' .: • • :. . • ••• ; • .i • • . : ligt + ''i'-71' '"4.VriAg.10' • 1,illp.i..1•:•di'•-ikri'lit;1\41•'•• 1,.... iipit . .1,k);c1.:vAir rivs: . . , ... , -. iti. ,,. ,.:'4.,,,,:',,, ,,,•:::,.,,,c;.: ,,;,,,,,,..• i,.,'Aq-v••••;'.--..... .:;.:.i.a. • . .... y..,..._........,......,..... :. C 6 4...5._r. ..._......_...___. • . .......................__ ___......... ............... ...... . . ........ .... ... .. .. .. . ,. . • • • • . • • • . • - - " • - - -- • ---" — -; • . . - . . . . • . • . . . . . . . • . . . . , ,' . . . . . . . • .. . . • • . •. - . . . • . . . • .• • .. •,. , •• . . • . . • • • . _ . . . • ,, • , •. • • ,...- --...... • ... . . . . ... ..._. .. • . .... . .,.._-.4.__7..........--.-- • . .. • .• . ... • . . • /--I • ----- . ... •••• • —. .-------..____-- • I 'I I ' ±Ethtiff:tha t . _ . . ,' •.. ... _ L-.1-1•-7.k.-ir.rl.tri*lt-•________.:p. 1. •\ ,•• L;• ---. -. ..-----• _....,.•--,.:••:•._11,,..::,..i• ,..f....,.. •.•. ..• . • . . • pi i11 f _ • •. . .•• . : • . • • . . . : _.---- • . • ... __. . . , ..., .. • .. . . . _..... . . ......_• . :::,. ... wi iiirits:,:•:: 1 P Ella 1-----iliP 11112 1101 ..•.,..,.!:::. .:::: P• I. • lips .: III I • ,... i ; II VII ; . • : . ..----- . . . ......%:;.1-4,. •.• '.• .. I Ili •• . I . . • • • • • • L .., , . • . . . . -• , • - • _....,...f.. ... 1 . . . •• .• . „ .... ... __ . ii P 1'11111 I.,.0 .1.; ,E,., ::..• ____ • . ___ .. .., • . . 4•Apic t 0.4,Lio..1 f..4de.. I ' . . : .. ''' '' .. : : . 1),4,.411.J 1-,.i. • • ,41:op 1.4,0.004,-rir .- . .....e.LLce.:...,..iti.i.41,4.1".4.41":4.c. -•...._71!/1,.;liAL ilf,_, . b,r.i...,. .._..k Zry.....L......• . 1 - . . .. • • -------:-. • _1:::1:i.:-i- --.:. . '"•• •- w • 41,:.• 44L 1.1%re- ...4, g•f••.1."If.. : . ' • 71.‘. .• o'il••4••:•,VI!1' ':.:':::• ';,.•.'.....;" ..'.;Iii:11"'i°• ' • .;Z-C-^:-•V... . • • • .:• . ., . • .. • . •. .. . . I • • • • . . . ' ' . • . .• . . .. . . • . . . • ' • . . . . • • . . , . ....,:•, ...• .,;......,; ....,'1.:V•74'.'....1.1-i 5`.:..,•••• s,. .•.0..,,, ,II.A.101,6 v .:41.!;...;,.,,..,.::::::,,,F ;.,..4,,..i;.:. ''''''''..4:.:.'.. . • •. . : • . • . --t•-••••--- ..: • . •.;.,.......••0:.•tt,..1.:::,,.;%,...,...,•'' gisovitIO- 's'V'..." ' '• . •,) . - . . . :.... ,'. .. ••..,...-,,,;,....••,•,y,....,..,...1,!,...?,.i..fi.)....v....',i!-$4 kli53, ,ii., ., ..',. . '.,,.., .. , , •- • • ! '. N..r.•..t"3'Cs.• ••••i stt:2......'4.:.,•..t...'...:,:.,,,,. 'ifelgt:..471 • • • •; ..•• .... '...0.7.11t44ZNI.'if;,;.1,,f;f1!441'‘,"..i.le.ii O.. kd,•••;:le.'P iitir..A? i • .. 1.4 A.. .•:),:'77.:CkIA'•.',414••%4 • 't:1'.I••••‘., • l,l'A ....- t- . •;;•tit•441.6174.•::. LI",/,.-"..1...I.•:;.-*,N.•• '.,'...''.rt WC:ST . t , . . .. • • G2.•S c2 .fi•G. v.,.7t _. /' \! • r'—'1-E,' ..Golo(.••GJt11Iry::[t • I ' 'e y,(eAI1..o.1¢.L.IG •,• I . 'N_ . c.Ln'. :(Y.a:..1.A fade.. fi it ri I I:ild 1 111 r • • • • e • ' ^u , t , F )+4Jn VJ :Ory p ai N . oc"N,,i4, " • � j r . w, r a v ...:, p.,,,,.. t.., ,,„,..„./;MOD, 1 i .....,..,.. . \ 1$ a� �1.41.�f"'70., 0 A %;:.., 'V':r`e `LyAe /-'►,A• I ♦ ? �f.edm/o0 w,Jve•1l • . p •k. ;:',• t. ', JJ,j�f, -1. 4A1 rr��ll•n�•-, • .,l.....g..;•,,.`� .k. i.;, r...., . • - 6,4tz e&CyA11One` , , l .... Project Name: COA Pre-Application The Check Cashing Store Project Location: 48 West Atlantic Avenue, Old School Square Historic District. :.;;;;:.::>;:::>::»::»::>:;:»::>::>::>::: :>«::>::>::>::>::>:<:::::::::>:::::;::>::> << t` E::;«„<.:<.:.::::.:::.>:>_:.:.::E..>:<:.::.::<: .:.::.:Q:>:.`A----- >: << ` >==>« >>>ataaa smm A COA pre-application for site plan and design review. No formal action was required. This project came to the Board for a pre-application review at the meting of February 21, 1996. A copy of the findings from the meeting is attached to this report. No formal action was required. The following is a brief narrative of the pre- application discussion. Staff presented the following comments from the Planning Department with respect to the parking lot design. • 45 degree angled parking should be provided. This would eliminate the need to reduce the 5' landscape strip along the east property line as well as providing the minimum 4' wide walkway on the west. • • The parking space at the N.E. corner of the site must be eliminated to provide the required 20' stacking distance. • Two handicapped spaces may be required. • The dumpster must be angled to accommodate Waste Management vehicles. Meeting Date: March 20, 1996 Agenda Item: IV-B HPB Findings 9 COA Pre-Application- Page 2 • The sidewalk should be extended from the rear parking area to the sidewalk along S.W. 1st Avenue. • In order to accommodate the required drainage retention, approximately 5 of the rear parking spaces may need to be eliminated. The Board suggested that the applicant revise the parking lot plan to conform to the above comments. The elevations were not well received. The Board recommended that the applicant select a specific architectural style and design the building accordingly, as opposed to trying to incorporate an eclectic range of facade elements which exist along Atlantic Avenue. Staff pointed out that the revised plans had not been reviewed by the CRA or the WAARC. However, both reviews will be necessary before the applicant submits plans for a formal COA application to the HPB. file/COA274pf Meeting Date: March 20, 1996 Agenda Item IV-B FINDINGS HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING FEBRUARY 21, 1996 AGENDA ITEM IV-B COA PRE-APPLICATION THE CHECK CASHING STORE 48 WEST ATLANTIC AVENUE OLD SCHOOL SQUARE HISTORIC DISTRICT ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD A COA pre-application for demolition; and design review of the elevations and site plan for proposed new construction. No formal action was required. ACTION TAKEN BY THE BOARD No formal action was required. The following is a brief narrative of the pre- application discussion. Staff explained that the primary area of discussion and direction would be the building elevations, as the planning staffs comments and recommendations regarding the site plan had already been transmitted to the applicant. Jeff Costello, Senior Planner explained that, when revised, the site plan would conform to the development standards. However, the Board felt that there were serious problems with the site plan and suggested that they should address their concerns with the applicant at the pre-application review. The Board's major concern with the site plan was the prominence and location of the parking lot on Atlantic Avenue and fact that the entrance to the lot was accessed from Atlantic Avenue. The applicant stated that he was willing to work with the staff and the Board to revise the building elevations, landscaping, etc., but that it was imperative that his business have a parking lot on, and accessible from, Atlantic Avenue. There was some discussion regarding the building elevations; the Board suggested that the applicant's architect look at the Block 76 Atlantic Avenue facade and the proposed renovation for the Haitian Art Center building for examples of suitable urban styles which are appropriate to the Old School Square Historic District. k Findings COA-274 P -Application • ',A'^ HPB Meeting, February 21, 1996 Page 2 However, it became apparent that the site plan was of major concern as it would relate to the revised design of the building. The applicant and staff suggested that the Board indicate how it would vote if the parking lot and entrance remained on Atlantic Avenue, before the applicant went to the expense of redesigning the building. Three of the members felt that approval would depend on the redesign and possible relocation of the building on the site and the relationship of the building to the parking lot and Atlantic Avenue access. The remaining three members said they could not support the parking lot and access on Atlantic Avenue regardless of the building's design. At this point the applicant stated that he would withdraw the proposal and continue his business in the existing building as it would be impossible for him to have a profitable Check Cashing Store without Atlantic Avenue parking and access. filecoa274f r 1111 `` ''' '`" ' TORT .. :. . : :. Project Name Community Redevelopment Agency Parking Lot in Block 60. Phase II of the existing parking lotto the rear of 20 and 24 N. Swinton Avenue. Project Location: Lot 3; the North 49.4 Feet of Lot 4; and the North 49.4 Feet of Lot 10, Block 60. The action requested of the Board is that of recommending to the Planning and Zoning Board that a Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) parking lot in Block 60 be approved as a conditional use in the Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD) The proposed parking lot is Phase II of the CRA's parking plan for Block 60. The parking lot will be open to the public and will also accommodate parking for events at Old School Square, the Tennis Center and the surrounding area. The parking lot will be the northern extension of the existing parking lot located to the rear of the CRA Bungalow and the Judge Knott Center (the Monterey House). The property is vacant and was formerly the site of the Love duplexes which were demolished in January, 1996. The proposed parking lot will have access from N.W. 1st Avenue and from N. Swinton Avenue. Parking lots in OSSHAD, which are not associated with a use (e.g. parking for a specific store or office), are allowed only as a conditional use. A conditional use is reviewed by the HPB with a recommendation to the P&Z Board who then recommends to the City Commission that the use be approved or denied. The Site Plan and Landscape elements will come to the HPB for review after the conditional use has been approved by the City Commission. Meeting Date: June 5 , 1996 Agenda Item: IV-A HPB Staff Report Conditional Use-CRA Parking Lot, Block 602 Page 2 Recommend to the Planning and Zoning Board that a parking lot located on Lot 3; the North 49.4 Feet of Lot 4; and the North 49.4 feet of Lot 10, Block 60 be approved as a conditional use in the OSSHAD Zoning District. file/u/cra-use ., 7 L- _1 _ _ N.W. 3RD ST. N.E. 3RD ST. I Li> Li Li CITY ATTORNEY ; BUILDING I p IIM . N.W. 2ND ST. N.E. 2ND ST. p -- z N LL.I D Z = p f- p z L.L.1 N N 11 M Z CITY HALL I Q N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST ST. I J Z COMMUNITY z z CENTER 1,!,,.;,:::,;: OLD SCHOOL W z SQUARE z Q TENNIS o STADIUM fi / ATLANTIC A V E N U E IIIII POLICE SOUTH ' COMPLEX COUNTY COURT z HOUSE p W I- u. 1- ¢ ¢ Z ¢ > Q N S.W. 1ST ST. S.E. 1ST ST. w IIII 7 El > ¢ ? N U1- p p II N M 4i _ W N 110- - It 3 3��3 w Ul N N- N N --gemr— C.R.A. BLOCK 60 PARKING LOT PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FL J -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: 11.1071