Loading...
HPB 02-05-1992 AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1992 6 : 00 PM PLANNING & ZONING CONFERENCE ROOM, CITY HALL Please be advised that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceeding is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286 .0105 . 1 . Roll Call 2 . COA -8--1s5 30 Lake Court, Terry Joyce and Diane Brock, S-oZL Owners . Replace all existing windows with aluminum single hung windows, including screened openings on front porch. 3 . Consider Preservation Recognition Sign Program. A. Criteria for awards B. Method of selection C. Design and text of sign. 4 . Consider HPB Participation in the Delray Affair, April 24 , 25 and 26, 1992 . 5 . Reports from Historic Districts . 6 . Approval of Minutes for January 15, 1992 . 7 . Unfinished Business . 8 . New Business . 9 . Adjournment. r MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD PUBLIC HEARING WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1992 LOCATION: PLANNING AND ZONING CONFERENCE ROOM "A" 100 N.W. 1ST AVENUE DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444 1. ROLL CALL: The Chairman called the meeting to order at 6 : 00 P.M. Board Members : William Ayers Absent Christine Bull Present Wayne Campbell (Vice Chairman) Present Daniel Carter Present Sandy Jamison Present Pat Healy-Golembe Present Rose Sloan (Chairman) Present Staff Members Present: Diane Dominguez, Planing & Zoning Dept. Stan Weedon, Planning & Zoning Dept. Pat Cayce, Planning & Zoning Dept. Diana Mund, Planning & Zoning Dept. 2 . COA S-024 : 30 Lake Court. Terry Joyce and Diane Brock, Owners . The applicants requested approval from the Board to replace all windows with aluminum double hung windows and to install aluminum windows in the screened front porch openings . Approval was granted with the following modifications : the front porch screened openings are to be enclosed with wooden double or single hung windows; and, the aluminum windows are to be double or single hung vinyl clad and are to be framed in wood. The effect of this is to provide windows which more closely resemble the original wood windows and which will be appropriate to the exterior of the buildings. Sandy Jamison moved approval COA S-024, seconded by Pat Healy-Golembe. The vote was as follows: Christine Bull - Yes; Wayne Campbell - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Pat Healy-Golembe - Yes; Rose Sloan - Yes . Said motion passed 6-0 . Y � 3 . CONSIDER PRESERVATION RECOGNITION SIGN PROGRAM: The Board agreed to go with a Preservation Recognition Sign Program with the specific details to be worked out at a later date. 4 . CONSIDER HPB PARTICIPATION IN THE DELRAY AFFAIR: April 24, 25 and 26, 1992 The Board agreed to participate in the Delray Affair if the Historic Society was also going to participate. 5 . REPORTS FROM HISTORIC DISTRICTS: None 6 . APPROVAL OF MINUTES: January 15, 1992 Meeting Pat Healy-Golmbe moved approval of the minutes for the January 15, 1992 meeting, seconded by Daniel Carter. The vote was as follows : Christine Bull - Yes; Wayne Campbell - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Pat Healy-Golembe - Yes; Rose Sloan - Yes . Said motion passed 6-0 . 7 . UNFINISHED BUSINESS: It was noted that the National Trust Conference would like a tour of Delray Beach with the Historic Preservation Board, the Community Redevelopment Agency and Old School Square participating. It was noted that the Colony Hotel received the Local Register Designation and was the only designation on Atlantic Avenue. Update on Little Tiger Check Cashing Sign; they are being issued a citation for non-conformity and will be brought before the Code Enforcement Board. 8 . NEW BUSINESS: None - 2 - 2/5/92 9 . Rose Sloan moved for adjournment at 7 : 10 P.M. , seconded by Pat Healy-Golembe. The vote was as follows: Christine Bull - Yes; Wayne Campbell - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Pat Healy-Golembe - Yes; Rose Sloan - Yes . Said motion passed 6-0. Next meeting is scheduled for February 19, 1992 . The undersigned is the Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for February 5, 1992 which wereformally � o ed and approved by a Board on Kn ,.c1 \ , 1992 . Di a Mund If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes . They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. - 3 - 2/5/92 a - R AGENDA ITEM 2 COA 8-155 30 Lake Court Single Family, Mission Style, Contributing, 1926 Terry Joyce and Diane Brock Owners Replace all existing windows with aluminum single hung windows, including screened openings on front porch. This was originally to be a staff approved COA for the addition of 2 single hung aluminum windows on the east facade. Some time ago one window was installed without a building permit or HPB approval. The applicant now wants to replace all the windows, some of which are original single hung wooden. This COA has been on the agenda three times and each time the applicant failed to appear. This item was turned over to code enforcement. The applicant has cited economic hardship and I have suggested she apply to the CRA for an interest free exterior improvement loan. Recommendation: Where possible the original windows are to be repaired. Serious consideration should be given to installing wooden windows on the front of the house. If aluminum windows are installed that they be vinyl clad and be framed to resemble the existing wood windows . • . , •• • ' ...e..--..IIK.-,J44 • — ?II •,.:•,,,,„ .. .••::::;-•••,,:•-;-; •,., •.,- ,...:.•:::::.;:, ..tails.' ..? '..-.. • .._- .,41. V:..:•...:•.;'' a;t:.,,...-..1-, -..--1•" ..,.... .......-, __-- " • ...--ie_-.....:e"4-;I==..•4:-.,:"..'..:-,--..- 4;-•--..Z.-."",':4"=41'4."I:1,"',X-.,,.-')..'•%.,.'.."..••-. .t4...-..=::,2--;.z;-:e.....7--•V;-:--.!.7•-1 .I.-.•_' '.'•..• x'.4.r,N.9-e4-.1r-..411 111-.4.4..4.:-.s.4.4." 4.•4 . 0•. 4 •A '. -.1.0.-..1.f-•,R:--•e.4 •-•_-.• - ,'•;_4-,:"'.-."•._-=-.-,_k.6,:i,-_4r-----1,-', .-:- 6.,....4?.................. • f ... •... - . - .. 4•1"..:•.--', -- - ...:...'" • ._.... .. . 6 •.41,...,_,;,:.•_, .. _. . - :-••••: 4.:.......• _ '''' -.6.-,•":7-/•)::,-,..,-:• I .rina• -,-- ,:--•,. -'.-=- -;1-----•if ..--F,17571%,...::. I* 1-: •••• 1 .. • 1-:----' ---- :, --- •- 7--,--- ir..----7-; ...,IL`7_,,,,t4-.; . •_.-. . _ - ,--.--- ••• . - . " '— ,-- -t---,I• r-i7o,r2-43r2'2r;•., - '',..-: ,•'."-'.-_ -• . ... -----:---A`;•,---•r• i,--.-7,1,---. • • •• •-* t,-,---.4.-,-:.,•:-, --• - .- ••:---.---:-..t:••.,----;0.1.--•!•••-•:. .,=•.F .;•-,:'• -,--: :-4:_,.-1.._ -,4:1"-,•;,_!.:it.-;..--,.:7-..t--`;.1•• :••••.• ••• ,, p...,- 41 11414 .4 ' 7.:-...t-'44.• .-' ' .-': '-. ..-0,4 ' --. .." .-4-•".. elf-,,:,4,etrci..24,4...,k 1: .... .r• -• •• ,-. - .!.. .." -.5-•''-•,-'' .1.- T.:,,t t•" ,f 1:-..th," 4'._%.,:lift . . '.e. '- '-•••tt:•?'".. ,' ir Z Z.-2"....•• '" .,'"':...",o., "i) •t-:.-•,:-.4...a... • ;,,...,: '7----.-., ••_ --' - - -",-• " • •.:•,-:.--..'•:,• '''-'-oi.'. ..*C!' '. l'",:,...-;.'-_ft...--V..,`:-;---::--:',-.-----•-:-':;'-...7-- "'.:1-::tif.r41:i: ":-.: -1.4. u-.1i•-•--1---.."1111.3.-%•-•:...:*•-::;-•••'•' )..ilt----4:!." --:IF.:-Cfift--;- .=•.• . It r ;1,4._-•••,,,P,ft•••.-„,,;-!_-_,,•"_•.=.s::_ -:•-:.--..,,••:•__;_,-,:--.-:[;'--7--.r---- - -, .- -. • --. ---.-- • . •=. .-• -• - . . ',.----•.: ' - -' ----,,iii:.........-`..;:-.'-:".;-:'..:ii if'f'_'-!-T-'. =.';',"t_-CE- -,..-:--• '-'..''','.1.4.-•.-.1.•-'"'`,•--`'-','- - --•;-,..-r.":,74-,-..1:',...-.:- . I :e:-.- s,--. :.1,..ye".44r1.4.1-.././Icaise 11111111Praftp.--•:-.:::::7.-'.%':',4---4'4 '-.... -4-. Z-.s.'....:15...i. -:.,-"-..•.-•- =, • -::!.-.-:-. - =•.-_, -'-.'". ------- .• ........ - . •• r • - - -• _ -'.7.;-•'-'-•'-',.-:•-•:-.f . ,'.-.1-Is'--*.;:-...---"--..-•-",.:::- ' • .t.--.-.4"--4---::'-: '. ' - ' • " ' • . - . ,...., .. , . . "..=--4,-'• - -- "47:-.- - .:4!".1-:',......‘:--!.•-; -,--,-..: „;,,_-,-,:---_-„:„..- ._--...- -- - r.-) ..-------' 194Ze- (........;•/ • • FINDINGS OF FACT COA S-024 30 LAKE COURT DIANE BROCK AND TERRY JOYCE, OWNERS. SINGLE FAMILY, CONTRIBUTING 1926, . MISSION STYLE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING FEBRUARY 5, 1992 This COA request was for approval to replace all windows with aluminum double hung windows and to install aluminum windows in the screened front porch openings . The COA was approved with the following modifications: 1 . Front porch screened openings are to be enclosed with wooden double or single hung windows. 2 . The aluminum windows are to be double or single hung vinyl clad and are to be framed in wood. The effect of this is to provide windows which more closely resemble the original wood windows and which will be appropriate to the exterior of the building. v/ MEMORANDUM DATE: JANUARY 30, 1992 TO: HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD FROM: PAT CAYCE SUBJECT: DISCUSSION ITEMS FOR HISTORIC DISTRICTS PRESERVATION RECOGNITION SIGN PROGRAM ( 1) Criteria for considering a property for award. A. Restoration of primary facade: Removing inappropriate additions and replacing with correct or documented elements . Examples: Aluminum windows with wood. Aluminum screen doors with wood. Removal of porch enclosures. Asphalt siding with wood or stucco as appropriate. B. Rehabilitation: Repair and restoration of deteriorating original architectural elements. Maintenance and repair. Examples : Repair window and door framing details Repair shutters, columns, pilasters . Repair balustrades and railings Repair of ornamental plaster detailing. General maintenance Painting C. Landscaping to include walls, fences, gates, and paving. (2 ) Method of selection: A. Who can nominate? HPB Neighborhood Associations Property Owner B. Procedure: Staff notifies HPB of candidates when sending Board Packets . HPB makes selection at next meeting. Notification of property owner ( 3) Design and text of sign. A. Suggestions B. Fabrication by City Color and lettering selection limited Blue background, same as street signs? C. Cost estimate if made by sign company. AMENDED AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 1992 6 : 00 PM FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM, CITY HALL Please be advised that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceeding is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F. S . 286 . 0105 . 1 . Roll Call 2 . Public Hearing: Request for Variance No. 88-24 : Louis G. Jensen, owner of the proposed Sundy Estates Plat (Sundy House) , or Howard McCall, Architect and authorized agent. The property is located on the east side of S .W. 1st Avenue, between S .W. 1st Street and S .W. 2nd Street, within the Old School Square Historic Arts District. The applicant is requesting relief from Section 4 . 6 . 9 (D) ( 8 ) (a) of the Land Development Regulations to reduce the required 20 ft . stacking distance to 15 ft. for the proposed Sundy Parking Lot #3 Site Plan. 3 . COA 8-174 Lots 2 and 3 of Proposed Sundy Estate Plat. Louis G. Jensen, Owner or Howard McCall, Authorized Agent . A. Site Plan B. Landscaping 4 . Clarification of condition 1 of Variance 88-23 regarding the north parking lot at the Sundy Estates Plat Development. * The use of paver blocks on the driveway apron. * The depth of the paved area from the right-of-way into the parking lot. Louis G. Jensen, Owner or Howard McCall Authorized Agent. to . Page 2 Historic Preservation Board Agenda February 19 , 1992 5 . COA 8-167A Migdal Family Chiropractic Center. 300 N. E . 8th Street. Request to modify an approved free standing sign by increasing the height from ground to sign 18" to 42" . 6 . COA 8-173 325 S .E . 7th Avenue. Mr & Mrs James Kolleda, Owners . Contributing single family residence. Construct a seven foot addition to an existing bedroom on the S .E . corner of the house. 7 . COA 8-166B 503 N.E . 2nd Avenue. Renaissance Dental Studio. Gerald Kunze, Owner. Contributing building. Consider a new design for a fence along N.E . 2nd Avenue. 8 . COA 8-157B Brandy' s Waterside Cafe . 840 E. Atlantic Avenue. Troy Ennis , Authorized Agent Minor site plan modification to allow the construction of a dock. 9 . Patio Shoppes, 714 E . Atlantic Avenue. Proposed new construction on vacant land. Consider a recommendation to the Planning & Zoning Board: * regarding the rezoning of Lots 42 thru 44 of Block 125, Palm Square Unregistered, from RM to CF, * regarding the conditional use to allow a private parking lot within the proposed CF zoning district. 10 . Reports from Historic Districts . 11 . Unfinished Business . �- 12 . New Business . 13 . Adjournment . MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD PUBLIC HEARING WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 1992 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM 100 N.W. 1ST AVENUE DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444 1. ROLL CALL: The Chairman called the meeting to order at 6 : 00 P.M. Board Members : William Ayers Resigned Christine Bull Present Wayne Campbell (Vice Chairman) Absent Daniel Carter Present Sandy Jamison Present Pat Healy-Golembe Present (Arrived at 6 : 05 P.M. ) Rose Sloan (Chairman) Present Staff Members Present: Diane Dominguez, Planing & Zoning Dept. Pat Cayce, Planning & Zoning Dept. Jeff Costello, Planning & Zoning Dept. Diana Mund, Planning & Zoning Dept. Susan Ruby, City Attorney's Office Sandy Jamison moved to amend the Agenda to hear Item #8 (COA 8-157B) before Item #5 (COA 8-167A) , seconded by Christine Bull. The vote was as follows : Christine Bull - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Pat Healy-Golembe - Yes; Rose Sloan - Yes. Said motion passed 5-0 . 2 . Variance No. 88-24 : Sundy Estates Plat (Sundy House) , Property is located on the south side of S.W. 1st Street, between S. Swinton Avenue and S.W. 1st Avenue, within the Old School Square Historic District. Louis G. Jensen, Owner; Howard McCall, Architect and Authorized Agent. Sandy Jamison moved to approve Variance No. 88-24, seconded by Pat Healy-Golembe. The vote was as follows: Christine Bull - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Pat Healy-Golembe - Yes; Rose Sloan - Yes . Said motion passed 5-0 . 3 . COA 8-174 : Sundy Estates Plat (Sundy House) Lots 2 and 3, Property is located on the south side of S.W. 1st Street, between S. Swinton Avenue and S.W. 1st Avenue, within the Old School Square Historic District. Louis G. Jensen, Owner; Howard McCall, Architect and Authorized Agent. Sandy Jamison moved to approve COA 8-174 (A. Site Plan) , seconded by Pat Healy-Golembe. The vote was as follows: Christine Bull - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Pat Healy-Golembe - Yes; Rose Sloan - Yes. Said motion passed 5-0. Daniel Carter moved to approve COA 8-174 (B. Landscaping) , seconded by Sandy Jamison. The vote was as follows: Christine Bull - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Pat Healy-Golembe - Yes; Rose Sloan - Yes. Said motion passed 5-0. 4 . Clarification of Condition 1 of Variance No. 88-23 : Sundy Estates Plat (Sundy House) North Parking Lot, Property is located on the south side of S.W. 1st Street, between S. Swinton Avenue and S.W. 1st Avenue, within the Old School Square Historic District. Louis G. Jensen, Owner; Howard McCall, Architect and Authorized Agent. At this time the Board forwarded to Item #8 per above motion. 8. COA 8-157B: Brandy's Waterside Cafe, 840 E. Atlantic Avenue. Troy Ennis, Authorized Agent. The applicant requested approval for a minor site plan modification to allow the construction of a 5 ' x 150 ' wood dock on the Intracoastal Waterway with three 5 ' x 12 ' crosswalks leading from the dock to Canal Street. Based on a determination, pursuant to Section 2 .4 .5(G) (5) , that the proposed changes do not significantly affect the originally approved plan, COA 8-157B was approved with conditions 1 thru 6 found in Findings of Fact. Daniel Carter moved to approve COA 8-157B, seconded by Pat Healy-Golembe. The vote was as follows: Christine Bull - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Pat Healy-Golembe - Yes; Rose Sloan - Yes. Said motion passed 5-0 . - 2 - 2/19/92 At this time the Board returned to Item #5 per above motion. 5. COA 8-167A: Migdal Family Chiropractic Center, 300 N.E. 8th Street. Weber Valentine, Owner. The applicant requested approval to modify a previously approved free standing sign by increasing the height from ground to sign 18" to 48" . Overall height of the sign to be 7 ' 4" . The Board approved the request to raise the sign (7 ' 4") as allowed in the RO zoning district with the following conditions : * Height from ground to sign 30"; * Overall height of sign 5 ' 10" . Sandy Jamison Moved to approve COA 8-167A, seconded by Pat Healy-Golembe. The vote was as follows : Christine Bull - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Pat Healy-Golembe - Yes; Rose Sloan - Yes. Said motion passed 5-0 . 6 . COA 8-173: 325 S.E. 7th Avenue. Mr. & Mrs. James Kolleda, Owners . The applicants requested approval to construct a 7 ' addition to an existing bedroom on the S.E. corner of the house. The Board approved COA 8-173. Pat Healy-Golembe moved to approve COA 8-173, seconded by Sandy Jamison. The vote was as follows : Christine Bull - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Pat Healy-Golembe - Yes; Rose Sloan - Yes . Said motion passed 5-0 . 7 . COA 8-166B: Renanissance Dental Studio, 503 N.E. 2nd Avenue. Gerald Kunze, Owner. Daniel Carter moved to deny, seconded by Pat Healy Golembe. The vote was as follows : Christine Bull - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Pat Healy-Golembe - Yes; Rose Sloan - Yes. Said motion passed 5-0 . - 3 - 2/19/92 9 . P&Z Board Recommendation: Patio Shoppes, 714 E. Atlantic Avenue. Burton Handelsman, Owner; Digby Bridges, Authorized Agent. The Board recommended approval of: * Rezoning Lots 42 thru 44 of Block 125, Palm Square Unregistered, from RM to CF. * Granting a Conditional Use to allow a private parking lot within the proposed CF zone district. Christine Bull moved to approve the recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Board on the Patio Shoppes, seconded by Sandy Jamison. The vote was as follows: Christine Bull - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Pat Healy-Golembe - Yes; Rose Sloan - Yes. Said motion passed 5-0 . 10. REPORTS FROM HISTORIC DISTRICTS: None 11 . UNFINISHED BUSINESS: None 12 . NEW BUSINESS: OSSHAD stacking depth It was brought to the Boards attention that the Sun-Sentinel on February 16, 1992 show cased the Terrimore house. The Sun-Sentinel plans to show case more of the Historic district from time to time. It was noted that the Australian Pines in Gulfstream are due for demolition in two (2) weeks. The Board decided to write a letter in favor of keeping the trees to the Secretary of the DOT in Tallahassee. It was brought to the Boards attention that Board Member William Ayers has resigned his position from the Historic Preservation Board. The Board noted that they were sorry to see him go and that they would send him a letter of thanks for his contributions to the Board. - 4 - 2/19/92 13 . Daniel Carter moved for adjournment at 8 : 00 P.M. , seconded by Sandy Jamison. The vote was as follows : Christine Bull - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Pat Healy-Golembe - Yes; Rose Sloan - Yes . Said motion passed 5-0 . Next meeting is scheduled for March 4 , 1992 . The undersigned is the Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for February 19, 1992 , which were formally a opted and approved by the Board on March 18, 1992 . A Diana Mund If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes . They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes . - 5 - 2/19/92 AGENDA ITEM 2 Public Hearing: Request for Variance No. 88-24 : Louis G. Jensen, owner of the proposed Sundy Estates Plat (Sundy House) , or Howard McCall, Architect and authorized agent. The property is located on the east side of S.W. 1st Avenue, between S.W. 1st Street and S.W. 2nd Street, within the Old School Square Historic Arts District. The applicant is requesting relief from Section 4 . 6 .9 (D) (8-i (a-) of the Land Development Regulations to reduce tha squired 20 ft. stacking distance to 15 ft. for the proposed Sundy Parking Lot #3 Site Plan. Please read the letter of justification from Howard McCall and review the attached site plan. The area for consideration is highlighted in yellow. A staff report from Jeff Costello is attached which explains in detail all aspects of the variance as well as the Planning staff recommendations. i DIY IF DEV -T! t1101 100 N.W. 1st AVENUE • DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 • 407/243-7000 PUBLIC NOTICE 88-24 A petition has been received from Louis G. Jensen requesting a Variance from Section 4 .6 . 9 (D) (3) (c) of the Land Development Regulations to reduce the required 20 ft. stacking distance to 15 ft. for the proposed Sundy Parking Lot #3 Site Plan. The subject property is located on the east side of S.W. 1st Avenue, between S.W. 1st Street and S.W. 2nd Street, within the Old School Square Historic Arts District. Section Requirement Provided 4 . 6 .9 (D) (3) (c) The minimum stacking distance 15 ' between a right-of-way and the first space in a parking lot shall be twenty feet (20 ' ) . Your property is located within a 500 ft. radius of the following described property: Lots 3 and 4, and the South 29 feet of Lot 2, Block 62, map of the Town of Linton (now Delray Beach) according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 3 of the Public Records of Palm Beach County Florida. The above lot is to be incorporated into Parcels 2 and 3 of the proposed Sundy Estates Plat. The Historic Preservation Board will conduct a public hearing at 6 : 00 PM on Wednesday, February 19, 1992 in the First Floor Conference Room at City Hall, 100 N.W. 1st Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida, and all persons interested will be given an opportunity to be heard. Please be advised that if a person or persons decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of the proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which to appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S. , 286 .0105 . If you would like further information with regard to how this proposed action may affect your property, please contact Patricia Cayce, Historic Preservation Planner, City Hall, 100 N.W. 1st Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida 33444, or phone 407-243-7284 . THE EFFORT ALWAYS MATTERS • 0, 1- Ion February 3, 1992 Historic Preservation Board en % Pat Cayce City of Delray Beach 100 N W First Avenue Delray Beach Fl 0 RE: Sundy Estates Lot 3 variance 0 Dear Mrs Cayce : This letter will explain the variance request for relief from o the requirement of Section 4 . 6 .9 (D) ( 3 ) (c) , requiring twenty (20 ) feet distance between the right-of-way line and the first parking space, of an off-street parking area . We are requesting a reduction of five ( 5) feet which will result in a setback distance of fifteen (15) feet from the new front property line to the first parking space . The driveway where this condition exists is on the East side of Southwest First Avenue leading into the parking lot on Lot 3, of Z the Sundy Estates Plat. A peculiar circumstance brought about Z this condition which did not result from an action of the owner . 4,4 One of the conditions that allowed abandonment of the alley in the center of the block, was that off street parking be provided for the three buildings on Southwest First Avenue . The logical cn place for the parking was the vacant lot adjacent to the four (4 ) (�j unit Apartment . We proceeded with planning and submitted to the W city the Master Plan for all of the Sundy property showing a parking lot with twenty one ( 21) spaces integrated with the existing landscape, including several large trees . During the public hearing for the Sundy Apartment / Sundy House combined site plan approval, the City Council voted to require a five ( 5) foot right-of-way dedication on S W First Avenue, and at the same time they allowed zero ( 0 ) setback between the new z property line and the first parking space for the parking lot in athe front yard of the Sundy Apartment. We are now asking for a variance of five ( 5) feet to offset the five ( 5) foot right-of-way dedication taken from Lot 3 . The parking lot was planned prior to the requirement of the right-of- way dedication, and physically nothing changes, that is, between the existing street and the planned first parking space . Five ( 5) feet is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the property. 41.- MEMBERS OF THE AMERIC AN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS �. 12 tom: The design of the parking lot is such that three ( 3) well R established trees remain in the parking area. If a twenty (20) foot setback is required, it will mean that the parking spaces in C`, the front section of the lot will move back five ( 5) feet and that would cause us to loose two ( 2) of the well established trees . Either that, or loose two parking spaces . To Mr Jensen, =z- it became a choice of loosing two nice trees or loosing two parking spaces, or asking for this variance in the hope of saving both the trees and the parking spaces . I believe he made a good choice because the trees and/or the parking spaces are of greater value to the community and the general public, than is the five ( 5) foot setback . I believe it will be in the best interest of the public to grant this variance . I ' ll be happy to reply to any questions that you have in this matter . Sincerely, ci) 14AktaX, MT(eX Howard E Mc Call C H 401.110 U U z U �'�� MEMBERS OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS VARIANCE APPLICATION HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH 100 N.W. 1ST AVENUE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 ITEMS TO SUBMIT WITH HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD VARIANCE 1. Recent legal survey of the property. 2 . Plot plan of proposed changes; all drawings shall be made to scale; the acceptance of the plot plan with the application shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Planning and Zoning or his designated staff. 3 . Photographs of all elevations of each building or structure on the subject property must be attached to this application. If the subject property is vacant, photographs of the entire site must be attached. Photographs from a related application for a Certificate of Appropriateness may be referenced. 4 . List of property owners within a 500 ' radius of property and radius map. These two items can be obtained at: Palm Beach County Court House Annex Office Property Appraiser's Office 345 South Congress Avenue Delray Beach, Florida 33445 Telephone: 276-1200 The list of property owners must include addresses with zip codes. When condominiums are involved, the names and addresses of all owners must be submitted. 5 . A $151 .25 check made payable to the City of Delray Beach. 6 . A written statement to the Historic Preservation Board demonstrating how the proposed variance relates to the appropriateness requirement of Section 4 .5. 1(J) ( 1) (a) (b) (c) (d) , of the Land Development Regulations (LDRs) . * * * * * All applicable questions must be answered on the application and it is recommended that all applications be submitted in person. If you should need further information or assistance, please contact Patricia Cayce, Historic Preservation Planner at 243-7284 . All material must be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department 30 days prior to the regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Board. - 1 - REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD Appeal# Receipt Filing Date Fee (1) The undersigned applicant(s) hereby files this�Appeal e/c estin g a variance from the terms,of ofhe StlLand Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach, pursuant to Section 2.2.4. (1A) Zoning District O 5 5 (2) The owner(s) of record are: , 1J4�Q al des ription of the subject property is LeT 3 SUNDy (3) The leg 5 E. c LoT LOGL 4Z U a Lf k to/u L The street address of the subject property is )0oNJ E Other than this Appeal , please state whether you or your (4) Appeal with the City of predecessor(s) is title has ever filed an De If soy Beach Board of Adjustment tureof the Appeal, the d the ate tect e property.pel If so, please state the and whether the Appeal was granted was filed, the Appeal number, or denied: (5) If the Appeal is granted, the effect will be to E3u1.-r p• 2 ( (6) Check applicable space below: Code Requirement Request FRONT SETBACK SIDE SETBACK REAR SETBACK LOT AREA LOT WIDTH LOT DEPTH FLOOR ELEVATION PARKING To RKl1J4 'LO' LER�GEP 'Co t5' OTHER _=�-- SQg ting ssar (7) Please attach a separate sheet(s) th Sectiona 2 2.4 ouof the Land y hardship, in compliance Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach. Any person or persons or any board, taxpayer, department, board or bureau of the city aggrieved by any decision of the Board of Adjustment may seek review by a court of record of such decision, in the manner provided by law. The undersigned applicant(s) certifies under penalities of perjury that all the statements contained in this Appeal, including any statements attached to the Appeal or any papers or plans submitted herewith are true and correct. ' \ Dater t 3 FRg2 (Authorized Agent) Address: 3I( E, Pott.LMErro P412k- 1' 13oc,e. P. r "-' FL Telephone No. 59 5 - 5 ¢3 Date: Owner of Record (Authorized Agent) Address: Telephone No. If the owner(s) of record has appointed an Agent to file this Variance Request, an authorization form signed by the owner(s) of record authorizing thissaid Varianceagent to Request, musent his/her st accompany(ththis interest(s) ) Variance Request. SCHEDULE OF HEARING Hearing Date: Time: Place: City Hall 100 N.W. 1st Avenue Delray Beach, Florida - 3 - F I . AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM Appeal # Owner(s) of Record: LoO I S J E 0 SIN • STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PALM BEACH personally appeared BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, p who, eing first duly sworn upon oath and personal that they are owner (s) of record of the knowledge say (s)following described real property :v,� of L1NTdru �� Ste_ �S►A+ES t�T4 �UL L.�' the street address of which ls,and that we hereby appoint: `v CAL[. Name: ,aLM PK 2D Address: P..o► ,v t. 3 3 Z Telephone No. µ to file any asand all papers with respect to our authorized agent, Beach Board of Adjustment, Appeal # , with the City of Delraythis appeal. and to represen PP t me (us) at any Hearing re arding Owner Signature Owner (s) Signature SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me this ___ day of 19Q, - Notary Public My Commission Expires: //- a-/ 9a HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD Variance Application # ACTION OF THE BOARD: (a) Findings of Fact (b) Variance Granted Variance Denied Other (c) Conditions Imposed Date Chairman Historic Preservation Board DLM/C:VARIANCE.TXT - 5 - Section 4 .5. 1 (J) • (J) Historic Preservation Board to act on Variance Requests: Pursuant to the powers granted in Section 2 .2 . 6(D) , the Historic Preservation Board shall act on all variance requests, within a Historic District or on a Historic Site, which otherwise would be acted upon by the Board of Adjustments. In acting on such variance requests the Board shall be guided by the following in addition to the criteria normally used by the Board of Adjustments . ( 1) That a variance is necessary to maintain the historic character of property through demonstrating that: (a) A variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare. (b) Special conditions and circumstances exist, because of the historic setting, location, nature, or character of the land, structure, appurtenance, sign, or building involved, which are not applicable to other lands, structures, appurtenances, signs, or buildings in the same zoning district, which have not been designated as historic sites or a historic district nor listed on the Local Register of Historic Places . (c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of existing ordinances would alter the historic character of the historic district, or historic site to such an extent that it would not be feasible to preserve the historic character, of the historic district or historic site. (d) The variance requested is the minimum necessary to maintain the preservation of the historic character of a historic site or of a historic district. (2) The Board shall otherwise follow all procedures, impose conditions, and make findings as required of the Board of Adjustments. • . r " D►aASE Sr Of EIi 1„,. 1P:.1ASE _ r IfII r/ .t l Ve 1 I `(+RAv\l DftJu• . l 9dv6 ` 5 . \\/. 1 5 A. V E N U E 8w r 4'GN 41 N I./K FWG� 5'e'c...T cs....►. O[O.C•T.° • V _ ..-72.N.\\ t 1-1 loss' tr 1� _AMIESER J r 1_ ,�- N 1 7 'i• < __._ 2 .. ______ 1 cx A .N -__i I nrPI- ?I i 2:14--.-•*- -.- 1 1 c A t I s C . ae V in Ic $ \ I I ••r .4i II id rt �- I v _ _ oil: i 1 0' '. \ + n "Pt SP I ! � l, 1 T I _ w1,. 1 1 - ems ali i 1 11 g 0 0 ,, ., .,.i. s .... ,,, 1.4 / ! I . .,:. __ _:1. R ii C? 01 m1 Iv 0 .. A. ___ , 1 I z .� f e mfP C ►F : cf) I 1 + t 1 I A' NN I z~ ° \, 1 I �t ....... ( j ...--._w @d1 I \ INS o • -A� ^� u N '�f n n \N I .7-4) , 1 -�_ 0 2 0_ r M i t • m -1 C. r J6i a r $ L_ �� r --- . _ u1or 1 i - n i a �-- n I rv ' -n o _ I R ". I ►--i i� T r f• m I \ 1 Z I' IC. ' - 7-��� b"5w1v(17�¢Y SGwl2'. ► _ - - • ll 1 • ! y- 9 SANI�[y� ��� tSD. 4'wlea FL`vCE �c—_ . TN I •. HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---- STAFF REPORT --- AEETING DATE: February 19, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: #3 ITEM: Approval of Site Plan, Landscape Plan & COA #8-174 for the Sundy Parking Lot #3 ccs l ( 1 I I I I z f-I 1 1 1 1 I S. W. 1ST ST. S. E. 1ST _ - Q 1 9 10 _= ♦'♦'♦'♦'♦4-4rl ♦♦♦♦41 z "'WO -�! ♦♦♦ .♦♦" 12 z _ ♦•••♦•.` 3 N s 13 N62--0 8 14 GENERAL DATA: _ Owner Louis G. Jensen Agent Howard E. McCall Location On the east side of S.W. 1st Avenue, between S.E. 1st Street and S.E. 2nd Street. Property Size 0 585 Acres City Land Use Plan Other Mixed Use City Zoning OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) Adjacent Zoning North: OSSHAD East: OSSHAD and CF (Community Facilities) South: CF West: RM (Multi-Family Residential) Existing Land Use Single family home; 2-story, 4 unit apartment building; a parking lot; and a vacant area. Proposed Land Use Construction of a 21 space parking lot on the southern end of the subject property. Water Service Existing on site. Sewer Service Existing on site. ITEM BEFORE THE BOAR D: The item before the Board is that of consideration of the following aspects of the Sundy Parking Lot #3 site plan: * Variance 88-24 : [LDR Section 4 .6 .9 (D) (3) (c) ] To reduce the required 20 ft. stacking distance to 15 ft. * Site Plan * Landscape Plan * COA 8-174 The subject property is located on the east side of S.W. 1st Avenue, between S.W. 1st Street and S.W. 2nd Street, within the Old School Square Historic District. BACKGROUND: The site is zoned OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) . The site plan incorporates Lots 2 and 3 of the proposed Sundy Estates Plat. The single family house and the 4 unit apartment building were constructed in 1925 . This project has a development history which is familiar to the Board. The site plan which is now before the Board is in response to a condition of approval to abandon the alley lying within this block (Block 62, Town of Linton) . On July 15, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Board recommended to the City Commission approval of abandoning the alley, subject to conditions, one of which was: That the petitioner shall seek site plan approval for a parking lot/lots to accommodate the lack of adequate parking for the properties adjacent to the alley. Another item that relates to the proposed site plan, is a variance that was granted to allow a mulch surface parking lot. On January 15, 1992, the HPB approved a variance request to allow a mulch parking surface for the parking lot associated with this site-- plan (Sundy Parking Lot #3) and the 24 space parking lot associated with the Sundy House/Apartments site plan subject to conditions . Historic Preservation Board Staff Report Sundy Parking Lot #3 - Site Plan Approval Page 2 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL: The development proposal is to construct a 21 space mulch surface parking lot on proposed Lot 3 and the installation of associated landscaping. The main entry to the parking lot is along S.W. 1st Avenue with an accessway provided on the east side of the parking lot, between proposed Lot #3 and the St. Paul ' s Episcopal Church parking lot. The purpose of the parking lot is to accommodate the 10 required parking spaces for the 4 unit apartment building and the single family residence located on proposed Lot 2, thus addressing a condition of alley abandonment approval. The 11 excess parking spaces are to accommodate overflow parking for the Sundy House Antique Shop/Tearoom and St. Paul 's Episcopal Church. SITE AND LAND S C A P E PLAN ANALYSIS: Pursuant to Section 3 . 1. 1 of the Land Development Regulations, prior to approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the. official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, the staff report, or minutes . Findings shall be made by the Board to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to the following four areas : Future Land Use Map: (The resulting use of land and structures must be allowed in the zoning district and the zoning district must be consistent with the land use designation) . The subject property has a Mixed Use land use plan designation and an OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) zoning designation. Pursuant to LDR Section 4 .4 .24(C) (4) , a parking lot is allowed as an accessory use to a principal use. The purpose of the parking lot is to accommodate required parking for the 4 unit apartment building and the single family residence and therefore, is an allowed accessory use. Concurrency: Facilities which are provided by, or through, the City shall be provided to new development concurrent with issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. These facilities shall be provided pursuant to levels of service as established within the Comprehensive Plan. For sewer and water, concurrency shall mean that direct connection to a functioning municipal system is made. For streets(traffic) , drainage, open space (parks) , and solid waste concurrency shall be determined by the following: * the improvement is in place prior to issuance of the occupancy permit; * the improvement is bonded, as part of the subdivision improvements agreement or similar instrument, and there is a schedule of completion in the bonding agreement; Historic Preservation Board Staff Report Sundy Parking Lot #3 - Site Plan Approval Page 3 * the improvement is part of a governmental capital improvement budget; it has been designed; and a contract for installation has been solicited. Water: There is an existing 2" water main located along S.W. 1st Avenue. The Planning and Zoning Board made a determination at the time of the Sundy Estates Plat approval that upgrading water main to an 8" main was not needed. With this site plan, there are no modifications proposed that will present any significant loading to the municipal water system. In addition there is no change of use of the single family residence or the 4 unit apartment building. Thus, there are no Level of Service considerations. Sewer: There is an existing 8" sewer main located within the alley to the (to be abandoned) rear of the property. No sewer main extension or upgrading is required with this development proposal. Drainage: Drainage is currently contained on-site. Paving and drainage plans have no been submitted. Adequate open space exists for on-site retention. Streets and Traffic: The development proposal will not generate any additional trips, therefore a traffic statement/study is not required. The requirement to dedicate additional right-of-way was addressed with the Sundy House/Sundy Apartments composite site plan and the Sundy Estates plat (which includes the subject property) . Pursuant to Sundy House/Sundy Apartments composite site plan approval, the requirement to provide 60 ft. right-of-way for S.W. 1st Avenue was waived and 50 ft. deemed acceptable. Thus, the Sundy Estates plat, dedicated 5 ft. of right-of-way along the east side of S.W. 1st Avenue. No additional right-of-way dedication is required with this development proposal . Parks and Solid Waste: The development proposal will not have an impact on park needs or solid waste level of service standards as the proposal involves existing residential units. Historic Preservation Board Staff Report Sundy Parking Lot #3 - Site Plan Approval Page 4 Consistency: Pursuant to Section 3 .3 . 1 (Basis for Determining Consistency) , the performance standards set forth in Section 3 .3. 3 (Standards for Site Plan Actions) along with compliance to Section 2 .4 .5(F) (5) (General Compatibility and Harmony with Adjacent Properties) shall be the basis upon which a finding of overall consistency is to be made. Other objectives and policies found in the adopted Comprehensive Plan may be used in making of a finding of overall consistency. The applicable performance standards of Section 3.3.3 and other policies which apply are as follows: Standards for Site Plan Action A) Building design, landscaping, and lighting shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. (Traffic Element C-1 .2) There are no building additions associated with the development proposal . The proposed landscaping will not affect visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. B) Appropriate separation of travelways is made for vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians in a manner consistent with Objective D-1 of the Traffic Element. With approval of the Sundy House/Sundy Apartment Composite Site Plan, installation of the sidewalk along S.W. 1st Avenue was deferred until such time as either the property owner or the City deems it appropriate to install the sidewalk. As the parking lot will be utilized for overflow parking for the Sundy House Antique Shop/Tearoom and St. Paul 's Episcopal Church, it is appropriate to have the sidewalk installed with the construction of this parking lot. An adequate pedestrian way has been provided from the parking to the single family residence and 4 unit apartment building to the parking lot. C) Open Space Enhancements Does not apply in that the standard deals with retaining vistas. D) That any street widening associated with the development shall not be detrimental upon desired character and cohesiveness of affected residential areas. (Housing Element A-6 . 1) There is no street widening associated with this development. The standard does not apply. Historic Preservation Board Staff Report Sundy Parking Lot #3 - Site Plan Approval Page 5 E) Development of vacant land consistent with adjacent development This standard does not apply in that the subject property is already developed. The proposed parking lot will be consistent with the St.Paul 's parking lot, which abuts the east and south property lines. This development proposal will not negatively impact the adjacent residential properties . F) Appropriateness of future use and intensity of the development of vacant property This standard does not apply in that the subject is already developed. G) Demographic Mixture re Adult Communities Does not apply. COMPLIANCE WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on a land development application/request. VARIANCE ANALYSIS: With this development proposal, there is a variance request (No. 88-24) to LDR Section 4 .6.9(D) (3) (c) , to reduce the 20 ft. minimum distance between the right-of-way line and the first parking space to 15 ft. Basis for the Variance: The agent's request letter states the following two reasons why the variance should be granted: "1) The parking lot was planned and laid out and presented to the City before the five (5) foot right-of-way dedication became a requirement, and 2) without the variance, it becomes a choice between losing two (2) parking spaces or losing two (2) choice trees. It will be in the best interest of the public if the variance is granted so both the parking spaces and the trees are saved. " With respect to agents ' basis for variance, a response to each is provided: 1) With review of the Sundy House/Sundy Apartments Composite Site Plan, documentation (staff reports, etc. ) and exhibits indicated that the parking lot shown on proposed Lot 3 was not a part of the Sundy House Composite site plan approval. With the 5 ft. dedication along 1st Avenue, the site plan should have been revised accordingly. Historic Preservation Board Staff Report Sundy Parking Lot #3 - Site Plan Approval Page 6 2) A plan indicating which trees will be affected if the two parking spaces are deleted has not been provided. It appears that if the two parking spaces are deleted, then less existing vegetation will be disturbed. In fact, if the two spaces are deleted, the parking lot may be designed a little better so it will be less impacting on the existing specimen trees . Pursuant to Section 4 .6 .9(C) (2) (a) & (c) , a total of 10 parking spaces are required for the single family residence and the 4 unit apartment building. As presented, there will be 21 spaces provided. If two spaces are deleted, the parking required for the residences will still be accommodated. Please refer to the attached "basis for variance" regarding the findings that the Board must make (Sections 2 .4 .7 (A) (5) & 4 .5 . 1(J) ) . TECHNICAL ITEMS: The following are items that do not require specific action of the Board and will be addressed with the submittal of a revised plan. Included as technical items are the conditions of approval of the variance to allow the mulch surface parking lot (Variance No. 88-24) . 1. Provide drainage calculations along with grading/drainage plans. 2 . On the site plan, show the sidewalk along S.W. 1st Avenue. 3. On the site plan, delete the 4 ft. chain link fence which is located within the 1st Avenue right-of-way. 4 . Conditions of approval for the mulch surface variance (No. 88-23) : * That the parking spaces be clearly marked with wheel stops. a •• •: - shellrock ba�� al LS' * That all tree stumps be removed from the parking area and suitable backfill material installed. * That paving be installed for that portion of the parking lot between S.W. 1st Avenue and the east side of the handicap space, and for the driveway that connects Parking Lot #3 with St. Paul 's Episcopal Church parking lot. • Historic Preservation Board Staff Report Sundy Parking Lot #3 - Site Plan Approval Page 7 OTHER ITEMS: The agent has been informed that a non-impacting site plan modification for St. Paul 's Episcopal must be processed. The modification must show how the cross-access from the Church parking lot to Sundy Parking #3 will be accommodated. This item has been included as a condition of approval. REVIEW BY OTHERS: Community Redevelopment Agency The subject property is located within the City's Community Redevelopment Area, thus requiring review of the proposal by the C.R.A. At its meeting of January 9, 1992, the C.R.A. reviewed the development proposal and had no objections. OSSHOA Special notice was sent to the Old School Square Homeowners Association. No comments have been received. Formal public notice has been provided to property owners within a 500 ft. radius of the subject property. Letters of objection, if any, will be presented at the Historic Preservation Board meeting. ASSESSMENT: The applicant is requesting a variance to reduce the 20 ft. minimum distance between the right-of-way line and the first parking space to 15 ft. Staff recommends denial of this variance request in that the standards required for granting a variance. The lot can be redesigned to meet the required setbacks, and still provide sufficient parking for the adjacent residential uses . The development proposal is consistent with existing development in the area and compatible with adjacent properties . However, a site plan modification will need to be processed for the St. Paul 's Episcopal Church parking lot which shows how the cross-access will be accommodated. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: First take action on the variance request; 1. Approve the variance request based upon positive findings with respect to the criteria contained in Section 4 .5. 1(J) . 2 . Deny the variance request based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to the criteria contained in Section 2 .4 .7(A) (5) and Section 4 .5. 1(J) . Historic Preservation Board Staff Report Sundy Parking Lot #3 - Site Plan Approval Page 8 Then take action on the site plan, landscape plan and COA 8-174; 1. Continue with direction and concurrence. 2 . Approve the site plan, landscape plan, COA 8-174 and deny variance request (No. 88-24) . 3. Approve the site plan, landscape plan, COA 8-174 and variance request (No. 88-24) . RECOMMENDATION: By Separate Motion: Deny the variance request based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to the criteria contained in Section 2 .4 . 7 (A) (5) and Section 4 .5 . 1(J) . Then; Approve the site plan for Sundy Parking Lot #3 based upon positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards) of the Land Development Regulations, policies of the Comprehensive Plan, and Section 2 .4 .5(F) (5) (Findings) subject to the following conditions: 1. That the Sundy Estates Plat be revised to provide an access easement on the east side of proposed Lot #3, between Sundy Parking Lot #3 and St. Paul 's Episcopal Church parking lot. 2 . That a Unity of Title be provided combining Lots 2 and 3, proposed Sundy Estates Plat. 3 . That a non-impacting site plan modification St. Paul 's Episcopal Church be processed which shows how the cross-access from Sundy Parking Lot #3 to the Church parking lot will be accommodated. 4 . That revised plans be submitted addressing the items identified in the "Technical Items" section of this report. 3, s \c QX time.\ ,' w'1��. a �.� f •-• um _:,-- .- ng . v. -Jce. Approve COA 8-174 and landscape plan for Sundy Parking Lot #3 based upon positive findings pursuant to Section 4 .6. 16 . Attachments * Exhibit: Basis For Variances * Site Plan * Landscape Plan JC/T:SUNLOT3 .DOC • Historic Preservation Board Staff Report Sundy Parking Lot #3 - Site Plan Approval Page 9 EXHIBIT TO SUNDY PARKING LOT #3 SITE PLAN STAFF REPORT BASIS FOR VARIANCES Pursuant to Section 2 .4 .7(A) (5) , the Historic Preservation Board must make the following findings prior to granting a variance: (A) That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not generally applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings subject to the same zoning (The matter of economic hardship shall not constitute a basis for the granting of a variance) ; (B) That literal interpretation of the regulations would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties subject to the same zoning; (C) That the special conditions and circumstances have not resulted from actions of the applicant; (D) That granting the variance will not confer into the applicant any special privilege that is denied to other lands, structures, and buildings under the same zoning. Neither the permitted, nor nonconforming use, of neighborhood lands, structures, or buildings under the same zoning shall be considered grounds for the issuance of a variance; (E) That the reasons set forth in the variance petition justify the granting of the variance, and that the variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure; and, (F) That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with general purpose and intent of existing regulations, will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Pursuant to Section 4 .5. 1(J) , in addition to the above criteria, in acting on variance requests the Board shall also be guided by the following: ( 1) That a variance is necessary to maintain the historic character of property through demonstrating that: (a) A variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare. Historic Preservation Board Staff Report Sundy Parking Lot #3 - Site Plan Approval Page 10 (b) Special conditions and circumstances exist, because of the historic setting, location, nature, or character of the land, structure, appurtenance, sign, or building involved, which are not applicable to other lands, structures, appurtenances, signs, or buildings in the same zoning district, which have not been designated as historic sites or a historic district nor listed on the Local Register of Historic Places . (c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of existing ordinances would alter the historic site to such an extent that it would not be feasible to preserve the historic character, of the historic district or historic site. (d) The variance requested is the minimum necessary to maintain the preservation of the historic character of a historic site or a historic district. T;SUNLOT3 .DOC 4.- . S ITE R.A d ti 21 • ...:,.__ . ._ i . . . ,,.1 -t- . D C 1444 11-7"vwu .,,....-• PAR C El, 1 (e.o wti t‘v� • • 1[111 . M1 I - ,r 1slog.. 1WujI N - ` _5. 1 Z oc LoL2_ . 01 ;-•• - , ....<4 Al o J I i• I f ✓• . I wirs, o j _i lYllll� I /� h+�e T• I" I j j :'2StotiY - P r 4 IBM APES.. NJ a i__ .:: . .. 4 - i it Ij_. . _ __________.5.3_1t OF Ler 3_ _ AI 1 ' ...._.mitt.--- (MtW-N.LIItQ OF oat 3) j --r-- 111 I I 1 I �5./ 12• 2l' - — ! II. t 36• to' le' I` N 'N O • O ALLEY I. II 2 3 4 5 1, l 'a "J to • AEA►+00 TO (— `. CYP. MULGN 9. ¢. 1,44 5uYFACI�5 ups `_ (ON COMDI =T O =IL.. • jaCGE55 F2AM EXISTUJG FoIAIT 4 V-1 PALING Lor -5T.pc.iS 1 3. N ' • • e.P I�co w..1- c u u RC N----44 3 Q.IIL mom) TIE T AT A.U. CW E • � �21 to 19 11a �—��11 11. I Is 1i 11 /—NI1 I, - r /64 0 1 a 1 V t0 • 1 Sb ---- —/-8••>`•------- 45` ,1!Li,- 12j cIt-i _ t In 131.52• h.ttoc Loj4 8• �! �-r \ 4'►vtas FeNGE t 1113DGE. l3q.521 - •� • �- cuu cam:u Ft V.I- LAAIa sc KPE ?-41"1 • x 51. N :� �- CH \ FL1 I � 3 :1047;.;-./Zo) 1 • _ i ' CLIti 6j 14. I STORY e ` a- - +%kit' ny 1.Li ik ��•._ ' SNGL. rAMIL r to:) I A- a l J A t/ 1 • so _i' V r J ` �J ,0,,, ... s='r)(rYP) LJ sue. / IV __Cfp in p 4,. "'�s S� l ¢ t 1, - �12 — ti3 J `; � '\ e3' \ 11:1, i 414, i •03 ' ( ife4 4: V' c STORY ANTS.= /.'` w .1. i :. I1I u1 -_ , t' ' '1 •,° 3 J / `alb �y. 1,+—I—gt.s-jr' +r56 • • . #55 1-1 10. a i (30)tx4 ( r . w- _, at; ��, 5� k li�i , Ct o tt ,051 * (50 Le& . aGt . . lilt fK' ` �f6� a�' .' 0 • i 0 (Z1)N C. N 0 .....„....) on L. / _�._� ...sue"_� 1 68�' l ,~ igfel 1 CZc) sF • 1 to_� fc �' ' + %.,40. •$ to `4.1 ••••.- ...._.114 75 ' J1,1) f - 1 . ,. ,... „„ (Z')N7 +,',:� •\ ,5 �15)ND1 "L03 14g4 I i --... / . ,rib- .stee) of) I 191 t91 4- jj yfthk It . ' : - ft'airiellj ILIP . ' ..-' ,\ I,f l jT tt j .fi L ./'_ i , i l %.r:_.4 y../, • 1 7 1 1: 1"` t!'17— Ti -ex 0,A(N UN%[ FRNct. s46 4V' 045 a51 it 5x _--Fx15r►Nix t-teOoke • February 5, 1992 ¢ Pat Cayce Historic Preservation Board 100 N W First Avenue Delray Beach Fl <r RE: Variance 88-23 Findings of Fact Dear Pat : When I received my copy of THE FINDINGS OF FACT for the Variance en Request 88-23, I phoned you to discuss a portion of the data that I did not believe was correct. Which is; the last paragraph of Condition 1, that referred to the north parking lot, and stated, c "Paving shall continue 20 ' into the site, which will allow a 32 ' stacking area from the street" . You told me how that wording was determined, but I did not recall it that way so nothing was resolved . You said that you would look up previous minutes to -o find where that matter had been discussed before . a In looking through my file, I found the following: A Memo to the City Council dated 9/24/91, from David Kovacs, which included the findings of the Historic Preservation Boards meeting of 9/23/91, awhich states on page two, under TECHNICAL ITEMS #1 "If a pearock parking surface is allowed, pavement must be provided from the existing street to the sidewalk, the sidewalk is to be concrete, a paved apron shall be provided to the edge of the first parking space upon entry to the site" . The key words, of course, is Cd "paved apron to the edge of the first parking space" . You will Wfind Mr Kovacs Memo to the H.P .B. to contain the same info. At a z later date paver blocks were approved instead of concrete for the sidewalk and the driveway apron. .44 Based on that requirement, the parking lot lay out was designed and the paved apron became an important element to the drainage cn plan. As it is now designed, the back edge of the apron is at [-' the same elevation as the railroad ties, thus forming an Wenclosure to contain the mulch parking surface all of which is at E4 a lower elevation. As it is now the apron serves a useful purpose . To extend the apron another ten feet into the parking area would be detrimental to the overall concept and would be of PG no value what so ever . At the variance meeting I expressed the reasons why the apron should be left as it is, and I thought the motion on this matter U was not to change the apron on the north parking lot. What can be done to resolve this? Can it be brought up at the meeting of the nineteenth? Pat, if it sounds like I 'm making a big deal out of a small thing, maybe I am, but it is important. Thanks in advance for your help. Sincerely U Ho and E Mc Call 2-4•- • MEMBERS OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS b'- 410 FINDINGS OF FACT VARIANCE REQUEST 88-23 SUNDAY ESTATES LOUIS JENSEN 106 S. SWINTON AVENUE HPB MEETING JANUARY 15, 1992 The Board determined that all findings pursuant to Section 2 . 4 .7 (A) (5) and Section 4 .5 . 1(J) were positive. Based on these positive findings, the Board approved Variance 88-23 to allow construction of parking lots with mulch parking surface with the following conditions: (See Page 5 of the staff report attached) Condition 1 . Improvement for the south parking lot: Paving shall continue from the street to the east side of the handicapped parking space on the north side of the parking lot and continue on a north/south axis line to the south edge of the parking lot to include parking space 21 and part of space 20. If the driveway to the east which connects St.Paul ' s parking lot to the subject lot is installed as indicated on the site plan, that driveway must be paved due to the difference in grade between the two lots. Improvement for the north parking lot: Paving shall continue 20 ' into the site, which will allow a 32 ' stacking area from the street. Condition 2 . The variance shall not run with the land, but shall apply only with respect to the site and development plans approved in conjunction with the Sundy House master development plan. Condition 3 . All tree stumps are to be removed from the parking area and suitable backfill material installed. a \ ` M Page 2 Variance Request 88-23 Findings of fact Condition 4 . A grading and drainage plan which provides adequate drainage and which will not produce a runoff which will cause a scouring action of the mulch must be provided with the site plan for the south lot and with the site plan modification for the north lot. Condition 5. The parking spaces are to be clearly marked with wheel stops. Condition 6 . Handicapped parking spaces are to be paved. Vote 5-0 • Pat Cayce C� January 16, 1992 M MEMORANDUM DATE: FEBRUARY 13, 1992 TO: HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD FROM: PAT CAYCE0 SUBJECT: ENTRANCE, APRON AND PAVING FOR THE NORTH PARKING LOT OF THE SUNDY ESTATES PLAT DEVELOPMENT. Clarification is necessary regarding the following two items in conjunction with the entrance to the north parking lot of the Sundy Estates Plat. The entrance is on S.W. 1st Street. ( 1) The use of paver blocks on the driveway apron. (2) The length of the paved area leading into the parking lot. PAVER BLOCK On August 14, 1991 the HPB called a special meeting which was held at the Sundy House to approve amendments to the original site plan, including the use of paver blocks for the sidewalk on S.W. 1st Street (see attached agenda) . In Mr. McCall ' s letter dated July 22, 1991 (attached) he requests approval for paver block for the sidewalk on S.W. 1st Avenue, but no mention is made of their use for the apron for the north parking lot. In fact the north parking lot is not shown on the amended site plan which is also dated July 22, 1991. In listening to the tape of the meeting the discussion focused on the pattern and the mix of color for the blocks. The motion to approve, made by Rose Sloan was to approve the items as they appeared on the agenda, which included sidewalks but did not mention driveway. Motion passed. Immediately after the vote, Jeff Costello reminded me that the City Engineer would have to approve the use of paver blocks for the sidewalk and I asked for a motion to send a letter of recommendation to the City Engineer. Dan Carter made the motion to send the letter recommending the use of paver blocks and he states "for sidewalk and drive" . However, when the Chairman restated the motion she did not mention "drive" and, as you see from the attached minutes, only sidewalks are referenced. MAttached is the memo I sent to the City Engineer on August 15, 1991 and I mention sidewalk and driveway. I have no record of his response but this might have been considered at a TAC staff meeting. It is my opinion that the Historic Preservation Board approved, aesthetically, the use of paver blocks, and voted to send a letter to the City Engineer recommending their use, for both the sidewalk and the driveway on S.W. 1st Street. I ( .` ' 22July, 1991 4100 Historical Preservation Board City of Delray Beach 100 N W 1 Avenue o Delray Beach, Fl 33444 Subject: Site Plan Amendment to COA 8-147 , Sunday House 8 On February 20, 1991 your board approved the Site Development Plan for the Sundy House, as per the attached plan, with conditions. Please find the enclosed A architectural drawings showing additions to and revisions to the approved Site Plan, consisting of Sheets 1 of 7 Site Plan, 5 of 7 & 5A of 7 Exterior Elevations, and Sheet a D 5 Detail plans for the wood patio and gazebo addition, and Sheet LA 1 Landscape Plan (revised) . . ci I hereby request that the approved Site Plan be amended according to the attached drawings. The changes will be: 1 ) Relocate the second floor stairway from the North side of the house to the West side. 2) To add a Gazebo and a wood patio, South of the house. 3 ) Change the finish of the five foot sidewalk on S W 1 Street, from concrete to. concrete paver blocks, similar to Z the material being used in other parts of OSSHAD. -aa An amendment will allow building permits to be issued and a construction to proceed. Concurrently, an application for 4 abandonment of the adjacent alley is being processed, and we are developing Site Plans for an application involving t) lots 1,2, 3, & 4 of block 62, that will further amend the Sundy House site plan, including moving the parking and driveway to the West and providing off-street parking for the eight unit apartment building. U contact me, and � If you require further information, please I will appreciate an early reply to this request. _ Thank you. U S ' ncerely, (C oward E ' Mc Ca 1 L.f'= MEMBERS OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS Y. 41011 AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD SPECIAL MEETING WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 14, 1991 5:00 PM SUNDY HOUSE, 106 SOUTH SWINTON AVENUE Please be advised that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceeding is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286.0105. 1. Roll Call 2 . COA 8-147-C Sundy House, 106 S. Swinton Avenue Louis Jensen, Owner; Howard McCall, Architect and Authorized Agent. A. Amend the previously approved site plan to include, for passive use only: new construction of wooden deck and gazebo; relocation of the fire escape; design and color of porch awning; paving blocks for sidewalks on S.W. 1st St. B. Discussion items for consideration: Mixed use to allow an antique gallery and tea room. Outdoor dining and active use for the new deck and gazebo. 3 . Make a recommendation to the Planning & Zoning Board concerning the determination of Similarity of Use to allow dental labs in the RO Zoning District as a principal use. 4.. Adjournment fl t 11011 MINUTES HISTORICAL PRESERVATION BOARD SPECIAL MEETING WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 14, 1991 SUNDY HOUSE - 106 SOUTH SWINTON AVENUE • 1 . ROLL CALL: Bill Ayers Present Christine Bull Present Wayne Campbell Present Daniel Carter Present Spencer Pompey Present Rose Sloan - V. Chairman Present Pat Healy-Golembe - Chairman Present Absent: None Staff Present: Pat Cayce - Historic Preservation Planner Stan Weedon - Planner III Jeff Costello - Planning Technician 2. COA 8-147-C Sundy House - 106 S. Swinton Avenue. Louis iensen,Owner; Howard McCall, Architect and Authorized Agent. A. Amend the previously approved site plan to include, for passive use only: new construction of wooden deck and gazebo; re- location of the fire escape; design and color of porch awning; paving blocks for sidewalks on S.W. 1st Street. Rose Sloan moved to amend the previous site plan and to approve the new construction of the wooden deck and gazebo, relocation of the fire escape design and color of the porch awing and the paving blocks for sidewalks, seconded by Spencer Pompey. Before further discussion, the Board members toured the house. Rose Sloan amended her motion, Spencer Pompey amended his second. The vote was as follows: Bill Ayers - Yes; Christine Bull - Yes; Wayne Campbell - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Spencer Pompey - Yes; Rose Sloan - Yes; Pat Healy-Golembe - Yes. Motion passed 7-0. Rose Sloan moved approval of the amended site plan to include, for passive use only, construction of the wooden deck and gazebo, re- location of the fire escape, design and color of porch awning and the paving blocks for sidewalks on S.W. 1st Street, seconded by Spencer Pompey. The vote was as follows: Bill Ayers - Yes; Christine Bull - Yes; Wayne Campbell - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Spencer Pompey - Yes; Rose Sloan - Yes; Pat Healy-Golembe - Yes. Motion passed 7-0 . /' 0 (7) Daniel Carter moved for a recommendation to the City Engineer 41011 to approve usage of paver blocks for the::_:sidewalk, seconded by Christine Bull. The vote was as follows: Bill Ayers - Yes; Christine Bull - Yes; Wayne Campbell - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Spencer Pompey - Yes; Rose Sloan - Yes; Pat Healy-Golembe - Yes. Motion passed 7-0. • B. Discussion items for consideration: 1 . Mixed use to allow an antique gallery and tea room. Rose Sloan stated she would highly recommend a mixed use which is so proper for this location. It was the consensus of the Board to allow this mixed use of the tea room and antique gallery and that outdoor dining as an "active use" was compatible with the intent of the OSSHAD zoning district. 2 . Outdoor dining and active use for the new deck and gazebo. Stan Weedon suggested this issue be checked into and a recom- mendation brought back to the Board. Jeff Costello defined what is and isn't allowed in the City Code. At this point, Rose Sloan left the meeting. 3 . Make a recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Board concern- ing the determination of Similarity of Use to allow dental labs in the RO Zoning District as a principal use. Bill Ayers moved to recommend to the Planning and Zoning Board • to allow dental labs in the RO Zoning District as a principal use, seconded by Wayne Campbell. The vote was as follows: Bill Ayers - Yes; Christine Bull - Yes; Wayne Campbell - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Spencer Pompey - Yes; Pat Healy-Golembe - Yes. Motion passed 6-0 . 4 . Adjournment. Bill Ayers moved for adjournment at 6:00 P.M. , seconded by Wayne Campbell. The vote was as follows: Bill Ayers - Yes; Christine Bull - Yes; Wayne Campbell - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Spencer Pompey - Yes; Pat Healy-Golembe - Yes. Motion passed 6-0 . -2- 8/14/91 .1j • / /Finding of Facts .COA 8-147-C Sundy House 106 S. Swinton Ave Lewis Jensen, Owner Howard McCall, Architect, Authorized Agent Action taken by the Historic Preservation Board at its Special Meeting of August 14 , 1991 which was held at the site: Approved the amended site plan to include, for passive use only: Agenda Item 2 A 1. Construction of a two level wooden deck, railing and deck to be unpainted. 2. Construction of a gazebo, to be painted white with roof to match main house. 3 . Awning over part of deck, material canvas, color dark green similar to house trim. 4 . Paving blocks in two colors mdepartment sidewalk approvalon S.W. to 1st Street, subject engineering 5 . Fire escape at the new location on the west side of building. However , if this cannot be relocated due to lack of door width the applicant may construct the fire escape on the previously approved north facade location. Agenda Item 2 B Consensus of the Board was thatooredining as use of tan ractivedusetlwas que gallery be allowed and that oud compatible with the intent of the OSSHAD zoning district. 4100 MEMORANDUM DATE: AUGUST 15, 1991 TO: MARK GABRIIE�EL, CITY ENGINEER FROM: PAT CAYCE, HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER SUBJECT: USE OF PAVER BLOCKS FOR CITY SIDEWALK At its meeting of August 14, 1991 the Historic Preservation Board approved, aesthetically, the use of grey and red paver blocks for the sidewalk and driveway apron on S.W. 1st Street in conjunction with the Sundy House Antique Gallery. It was pointed out that your department had not been made aware of the proposed use of the pavers . Therefore, the HPB voted to send you a letter recommending that you approve the use of pavers for this project in the Old School Square Historic District. Please phone me 7284 if you need additional information. R AGENDA ITEM . 4 HPB MEETING 2/19/92 • COA 8-167A Migdal Family Chiropractic Center. 300 N.E. 8th Street. Request to modify an approved free standing sign by increasing the height from ground to sign 18" to 42" . This sign came to the HPB on 12/18/91. The applicant originally requested that the sign be mounted 38" from ground to sign for a total overall height of 6 ' 6" . The building department approved the sign with the recommendation that plantings be installed around the base of the legs. The HPB approved the sign with the following modifications : Sign to be mounted 18" above ground rather than the proposed 38" . Reducing the overall height from 6 ' 6"to 4 ' 10" . Approval was given to mount the address on the top of the sign or in a planter located near by. At the time the applicant selected and designed the sign the 8th Street construction was underway. The City has installed new sidewalks in the swale area and will plant dwarf bougainvillea on both sides of the sidewalk. Staff tells me that Dwarf bougainvillea matures to a height of about 2 ' . The applicant is concerned that the sign will not be visible when the bushes mature. She is asking approval to increase the height from the ground to 42" . This will raise the overall height to a total of 6 ' 10" . Staff recommendation: Raise the base of sign to 30" which will provide an overall height of 5 ' 10" . • • , •. • • • • i - . • • . • • • • • , ...... .. . . • . • - . . ...- . . . • . , . *. • 4 /4 .,i L,.., • • 1 ' • . . *4441k I . c .. _ 71 /7 0 4../".....r• 7 .... ift, am - di ......- 1 0 tj 11 'V/ 1 .!2" 1 01.4.1. 0 dellbli I 1 i . 1 Pi9 . Cfa az0 •... ,171 0 8 e• ehz•'" - 1 — ........j.d .L. ,,d...4.. — •- ' ,..• .• a • 1 i' • '6Vik r_•, *.• • _ . ,../ .4.0,...... 141,. _ ...........--).. ot i 4 ' eel-.1.... ...../ . er el 1 8 it e 14964 VA (ic • 00.14, - / , 4 , , . . . . . ' ' _____/Ot .444146644.444.3N R E V i EW ?I%, .)..."-)4 . . • • . ___/0.-4. PLAN REVIEW 9 i EtEiSTRRI ? 4.e,,,....s.i.., .• •;.•:',,v-als•••.. . . Otte .1.,i-„,:e••16(i, ;:-.. , ,K . ...pci asa.. K",a tA".+419 C A'N cr'6°"4-t. ' ,-(e? • 1 2-11111 i SIGNMI—IEViStC .,r• ie,...4• ,,,,,,,4t..P.:1,s_ CLat °4:° e rAme. III, 117: . . ais,_, ,,,th i •••,...•,.......-.•,..,•(...q,,,,, • ,,,,,,,,- -,t.,..-1-..,..!••,... . ..... • .., •:•.- •:.:-.•,,,- • , ,...•, . . . 6 b x d„,.÷.4:, 4 .:.... .„ ..: , :.„.,... .. . , ...:„..,,,.. . ..."_.... .,.. . T- FINDINGS OF FACT HPB MEETING FEBRUARY 19, 1992 COA 8-167A Migdal Family Chiropractic Center. 300 N.E. 8th Street. The applicant requested approval to modify a previously approved free standing sign by increasing the height from ground to sign 18" to 48" . Overall height of the sign to be 7 ' 4" . REASON FOR MODIFICATION REQUEST The City has installed new sidewalks in the swale area to the north and west of the above property and will plant dwarf bougainvillea and spider lilies on either side of the sidewalk. Bougainvillea and spider lilies mature to an approximate height of 24" . The applicant sought relief from the approved 18" because the lower portion of the sign will be obscured when the plants are full grown. The overall height of the modified sign (7 '4" ) is allowed in the RO zoning district. • ACTION OF THE BOARD Approved the request to raise the sign with the following modification: Height from ground to sign 30" . Overall height of sign 5 ' 10" . The Board' s decision was based on: 1 . The sign will not be obscured when the plants mature 2 . The sign is located at an entrance to the Del-Ida Park Historic District. 3 . A lower sign is more appropriate for the historic district, parts of which are zoned R I-AA and RL. The vote was 5-0 AGENDA ITEM 5 HPB February 19., 1992 COA 8-173 325 S.E. 7th Avenue. Mr & Mrs James Kolleda, Owners. Contributing single family residence. Construct a seven foot addition to an existing bedroom on the S.E. corner of the house. This is the original house in the center of the Riekse Plat. The new owners plan to add the bedroom addition to the S. E. corner of the house. Wooden French doors will be installed, the exterior siding and roof will match existing. The addition is not visible from the street. Recommend approval I .. / 1 , i i i 1 APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1 .t HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 100 N.W. 1ST AVENUE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 1 • The Historic Preservation Board meets on the first and •1 third Wednesday of each month. This application must be filed -' 15 days prior to the next available meeting. i Address of Property v S. C' 7 7J✓c Con - /73 Affix One Clear Picture • • - : " ik_ l� t • X _� t Z wi 4• 4 a ic ,v ,..--'.1."-'' - - • .- -. . 1 . . '. 11. :::4 . .. ,.;.,:t;''';!_;.1-:-..1*.):1.,.47.4 .1-'2.tf:6;:;:::::::".--1:1:1, ., y si t • .t , „ a tr .~ . i. .. , , , , VN"'.V - �. 1 _ `4> •T Kam_ x- '''� }. '14, t f .32s S s^ 7-4( 1dam 25" Sf. 7Tg,/E 78, 35 7.. � I‘t\' rjAd • L�/�7;5 Glz;1 J /w • /A' • • , • , 0 pa •N. N1/4 • V. ';/\< • \N 1Z) gr Sr/k ..coa 7-"P /Pia- . • PS":11:\ L":-.,\ tirE r� vit'mow , * I n OQ _ ,� I I a ,00 �B I - I * u 0 i� :1-1 L 1 (iV1 s/o,st t/) Y -� _ t , w� a o. c o Y 1 ( A )\; • z '''' ,-L., .::1 41 ':I eat 4' <I (Z/1 ./..1/Cabi II• �i.�:a S2g xr j 0.11a7N0, ( ,fl't ri . \r` / !.j 1 .w -, �7/v,-7d/5_P.3� A `I ` l n �'" 9 Y� oeON r i 1 ,OL'Q8 1. 1 I mPi /\ k`� 7 ' h r I /tit S� ENO � w )0? oe� .8 Al.v, SO rL 0 ; I �` N Y119 rI- .. ®% nl ( 7 [1,,, . , jh �y . I! • I .q.-,ywsrrw , i.� .am `� . e o ... ObQu ..'. 1- .r Cs 7- :,4 ti ....., el ' I id •:, .177,-./a,. , (` ,..2 0,1ies.vs, : 1 1 .., s �Z ~1)Ybd • "''''1- . t I , zags,. stx./ ;�.s74./ 2 yAs3w -Va', 0. ,.f/ ar 1 ,0['88 ' '�/ '••St VI- rr+�t`n ,00eSt. �`�s o --`_�.00'0L a' • ' ('J,SQ.z b1),SG.E'. - -- +�I 1� i M I N. . T-T. ^ / . J d I •' r1'SOd�/1d t' ` 0 I . "^) —� r 77u S boar Q lb AJvdJ l�nr1.b11 °q--I I/ I •lit.•• � \ .off � 9 ro•o �i,/y.V�d f•.-G '.� 's ,Mio�.11 y H12ION F • .. FINDINGS OF FACT HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING February 19, 1992 COA 8-173 325 S.E. 7th Avenue. Mr & Mrs James Kolleda, Owners. Contributing single family residence. The applicants requested approval to construct a seven foot addition to an existing bedroom on the S.E. corner of the house. Wooden French doors will be installed, the exterior siding and roof will match existing. The addition is not visible from the street. This is the original house in the center of the Riekse Plat. Approval granted, 5-0. AGENDA ITEM ref HPB MEETING FEBRUARY 19, 1992 COA 8-166B 503 N.E. 2nd Avenue. Renaissance Dental Studio. Gerald Kunze, Owner. Contributing building. Consider a new design for a fence along N.E. 2nd Avenue. Mr. Kunze is proposing to redesign the fence for N.E. 2nd Avenue. He will bring photos and/or drawings as examples. Please see his attached letter. Wooden fences are not appropriate to the Art Moderne style of this building. A masonry wall) sometimes used in combination with decorative metal work, is the typical yard enclosure for this style. Garden walls were not widely used with Art Moderne except in urban settings where they 011 provided security and privacy. The applicant has stated that the fence is a deterrent to trespasser cutting across his corner lot. As an alternative to the fence I would suggest a large corner area be attractively massed with plantings, with bougainvillea predominating, which would serve as a physical as well as aesthetic barrier to corner cutters. z-f tZl 9Z� c\\ . 1.1 is s «A. -P r� �1 -rL a} T►'‘Ps. L, L, , p42-ct t-.1 44 t Lex- V'e-- �f r►t tom' ` �Ci t3�- k 4 V%4.- f_1 e_Lty-N. . eoN S t t.J 0 u lcL Av.'MotJ 12� wkkAN k1`'- A'- oc- Proffer , w h►c.' 1`t).e- A-o N►n A tIAA►r.j IN►.54, E.1.3 cc_. t 'S A St-►.-) tSSVe.,, I Ai*rtcto�-e`i T to2. oA-� a_. w14, -"wt.. rcru h 4001 V\oN2� HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD • CITY OF DELRAY BEACH --- STAFF REPORT --- AEETING DATE: February 19, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: Brandy's Waterside Cafe - Minor Site Plan Modification to Allow the • Construction of a Dock ,TEM: #$ Tri ,......_4._ ........_ ATLANTIC AVENUE � r. 91r.v4 i 4Plir4 W - < _ t .< WATERWAY • < - ::, -_ EAST CONDO 4ce i3; ti Vl ij a. I BAR HARBOUR I. I v W- : GENERAL DATA Owner Highbridge Associates Agent Troy H. Ennis, President Delray Marine Construction, Co. Location On the south side of Atlantic Avenue, between the Intracoastal Waterway and Palm Way. Property Size 0 8166 Acres City Land Use Plan Commercial Core and Medium Density 5-12 du/acre. City Zoning CBD (Central Business District) and CF (Community Facilities) . Adjacent Zoning Land to the north of the subject is zoned CBD and CF, land to the west is CBD, land the south is zoned RM (Multi-Family Residential) , to the east is Canal Street and the Intracoastal Waterway. Existing Land Use Three buildings with attendant parking. Proposed Land Use Addition of 5'x 150' dock with (3) 5'x 12'crosswalks from the dock to Canal Street. Water Service Existing on-site. Sewer Service Existing on-site. a"; L ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD: The item before the Board is consideration of a minor site plan modification to allow the construction of a boat dock at Brandy's Waterside Cafe. The subject property is located at the southwest corner of E. Atlantic Avenue and the Intracoastal Waterway, within the CBD (Central Business District) zone district and the Marina Historic District. The Director has determined the modification to be classified as "minor" in that it does not meet the test of a non-impacting modification but does not significantly impact findings made at the time of initial site plan approval . [Ref Section 2 .4 .5(G) ( 1) (b) ] BACKGROUND: In July 1991, a request was submitted for a non-impacting site plan modification to allow construction of a boardwalk at Brandy's Waterside Cafe. The request was determined to be "non-impacting" on the basis that a boardwalk would have pedestrian use only and would not add intensity of use. Prior to approval of the modification, permits were to be provided from the appropriate agencies (i.e. Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resources Management, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers & Florida Department of Environmental Regulation) . On January 3, 1992, permits were provided from the agencies . However, the permits provided diverged from the non-impacting site plan modification request of July 1991, which was represented as a boardwalk. As the facility is described as a dock, the request has been classified as a minor site plan modification, which is before the HPB (Historic Preservation Board) for action. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The development proposal is to construct a 5 ' X 150 ' wood dock, with three 5 ' X 12' crosswalks leading from the dock to Canal Street. The following is the project description submitted by the. applicant: " . . .to construct 750 square feet of boardwalk and dock to be located over the Intracoastal Waterway as per my attached site plan. " 1POSEDEC4 . . lick/4lr7C 4"A' . t.wmo Wawa. ^�`" f I - ' ROM,LP \�`m\r\✓\` `\``\ \ \ \ r'' •T \:,/ __-49 �50\`\\`^ __-^ 51 i ;! xb��\\\\\\\ %\\\\\\ �\�\\�\� �\ \\`\""" it ED N — , \ \ \ \\ I , �i 1 i \ ' •� i , \ \ awtw.0o.c w•u awr.ro0o \ mr«w \ i \ \\ _. L 1 1 �► \ *,_). \ \)\_ \1\NN, \\,1 \ ,, i i r r \� \ r OaM I i L-i 1 r fr,...✓ 9,a...✓ .1 - .•w w•u 4 .-wrw ca.a w.0 _ t—, o o a� o 'I .i • o Ic� F wNTM I I M ANwN✓M� 1\\J \ T. �` •�wNT.N1..1� O I rtl ,.r aNwo H f 3_ W—�� I. IUM •/ a3 1111 a , SITE'A' 111� Iplle"' • • wa::,:;wiaMnn rm..w I 1 w�:ewa �`12 ill .- Q • /1_.. 0.-u. ..w.r ' \% ' I }I y,osr.ww.w•erNn • r...—.•eu 11 A"Nram err• �rT I = / I am.w.n i rmw -^�"� w•rarlr�� �1 1 Q'I _'�— * * •• Ji_ _ — ..- A .✓ri\ =d'_a.T✓ - ' d" ✓L 1 �' �^�"�• tr.,. err.V q r.✓ : Nin-- O i * • o ply u c ,.� y.i ..t rsr.o,. r� c o cam— s II r 'r„(. ,e.' •ry ter'*. w. __ 1• � //�, / 1t5.o0" r 11, ___ ram. • 4 y 4 I w __, 4 _ •air. 0 �INIII !� ri-----_ ... —. . J „ 2 • h i SITE'B' - • 6 - 1 i , soo SY •2 CBD 2bNiINO \, v 'CF ZONING 4 ! LT:, i O O O O O O G—r .� 1 .p Le • ti •1 �vwr.r..•a..al..w•u `239., / \ 1 I �55 ,�•.re r.'wow CALL WALL .� ir...,wa..�. ' 1111 it 'RAJ ^J I_ k� HPB Staff Report Minor Site Plan Modification - Brandy's Waterside Cafe Page 4 ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1 . Continue with direction and concurrence. 2 . Approve the minor site plan modification. 3 . Deny the request with basis stated. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Based on. a determination, pursuant to Section 2 .4 .5(G) (5) , that the proposed changes do not significantly affect the originally approved plan: Approve the site plan modification for Brandy's Waterside Cafe subject to the following conditions : 1. That the dock be for the exclusive use of the patrons of the Brandy' s Waterside Cafe (adjacent restaurant) . 2 . That a sign be installed, in a prominent location, advising all boaters of no extended or overnight mooring. 3. That manatee awareness signs be installed on the dock advising boaters of the potential of manatees being in the area's waters and the need to use caution while boating in the area's waters. (The signs shall be in place upon completion of construction and prior to mooring of vessels at the dock. ) 4 . That verification be obtained from Florida Power and Light, Southern Bell and Leadership Cable attesting that constructing the dock and mooring of boats at the cable crossing is acceptable. 5. That the conditions as setforth in the permits issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Permit No. 199101999819 (LP-LS) ) and Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Regulation (Permit No. DF-403-91) be met. 6 . That prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant obtains the appropriate license agreements from the City for the use of the right-of-way, and provides a hold harmless agreement which is acceptable to the City Attorney. Attachment: Proposed Site Plan JAC/T:HPBDOCK.DOC HPB Staff Report Minor Site Plan Modification - Brandy's Waterside Cafe Page 2 "The intent of the boardwalk is to offer a safe area for patrons to stroll by the waters edge and dock small to medium sized boats while dining. The dock as proposed will be able to safely dock 4 to 6 boats at any one time. We have received all required Federal, State, County and Environmental permits for this project. Our criteria for construction matches that of neighboring docks . Handrails are to be placed along all edges of the boardwalk not directly facing the waterway. We will be placing signs on the east edge of the dock stating that the dock usage is strictly for the patrons of the restaurant and that overnight parking is prohibited. " SITE PLAN ANALYSIS: REQUIRED FINDINGS: (Chapter 3) Pursuant to Section 3 . 1 . 1 (Required Findings) , prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, the Staff Report, or Minutes . Findings shall be made by the body which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to the Future Land Use Map Compatibility; Concurrency; Comprehensive Plan Consistency; and, Compliance with Local Development Regulations (LDRs) . At the time of the major (parking lot) and minor (deck addition) site plan modification approvals for Brandy's Waterside Cafe (HPB actions of July 17, 1991) appropriate findings were made with respect to the Future Land Use Map, Consistency and Concurrency. Improvements required per the site plan modification approvals have been installed and will not be impacted by this minor modification. Compliance with Land Development Regulations : Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on a land development application/request. Proposed Dock Use: Pursuant to LDR Section 4 .4 . 13(C) ( 1) , within the CBD zone district, parking for patrons of the primary use is an allowed accessory use. The proposed dock provides a similar function in that patrons of the restaurant may arrive by boat, and "park" their vessels at the dock. Therefore, the dock is considered an accessory use, and is limited to the exclusive use of the patrons of Brandy' s Waterside Cafe. Further, the permit issued by the Army Corps of Engineers states that the dock is for the exclusive use of the customers of the restaurant. HPB Staff Report Minor Site Plan Modification - Brandy's Waterside Cafe Page 3 There are existing docks located south of the proposed dock location. These docks are allowed as an accessory use to the residential uses. It is important that a distinction be made between the proposed dock and a "commercial dock" . The building permit application for the dock does not indicate the installation of services i .e water, sewer and electric outlets, which are items associated with commercial docks. In addition, the Corps of Engineers permit states that there shall be no extended or overnight mooring of vessels at this dock. Therefore, the dock is not considered a "commercial" dock. OTHER ITEMS: The proposed dock will be located over an existing cable crossing. A "No Anchoring" sign is posted. Prior to approval of the site plan modification, verification must be provided from Florida Power and Light, Southern Bell and Leadership Cable that constructing the dock and mooring of boats in that location is acceptable. If the location is unacceptable, the configuration of the dock may need to be modified. If the latter is the case, then modified permits from the approving governmental agencies will need to be provided. A remaining issue concerns the City's interest in Canal Street as a public right-of-way. According to the original Town of Linton plat, Canal Street is a dedicated public road. The Army Corps of Engineers has an easement for the Intracoastal Waterway, which includes Canal Street, however, this easement does not negate the City's interests . Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the dock, the applicant must obtain a license from the City to use this right-of-way, and must provide an agreement indemnifying the City from any liability resulting from the use of the dock. ASSESSMEN T: The proposed dock is allowed as an accessory use to Brandy' s Waterside Cafe and is an appropriate adjunct to a waterfront restaurant. In the past, residents living in this area along the Intracoastal expressed concerns about the docking of a cruise boat at this location. However, this request made by Brandy's differs from the previous proposal in that the dock is for the exclusive use of restaurant patrons, for the temporary docking of private boats. Additionally, the Army Corps of Engineers permit limits the type of vessels to small and medium sized boats (general range 18 ' - 40 ' in length) . A maximum of 6 boats will be docked at any one time and the hours of operation will be limited to the restaurant business hours. 1 ' 1 •j FINDINGS OF FACT HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING, FEBRUARY 19, 1992 COA 8-157 B Brandy' s Waterside Cafe 840 E. Atlantic Avenue Troy Ennis, Authorized Agent The applicant requested approval for a minor site plan modification to allow the construction of a dock on the Intracoastal Waterway. The proposal is to construct a 5 ' X 150' wood dock, with three 5 ' X 12 ' crosswalks leading from the dock to Canal Street. Based on a determination, pursuant to Section 2.4 .5(G) (5) , that the proposed changes do not significantly affect the originally approved plan, COA 8-157B was approved with the following conditions: 1 . That the dock be for the exclusive use of the patrons of the Brandy's Waterside Cafe (adjacent restaurant) . 2 . That a sign be installed, in a prominent location, advising all boaters of no extended or overnight mooring. 3 . That manatee awareness signs be installed on the dock advising boaters of the potential of manatees being in the area's waters and the need to use caution while boating in the area' s waters. (The signs shall be in place upon completion of construction and prior to the mooring of vessels at the dock. ) 4 . That verification be obtained from Florida Power and Light, Southern Bell and Leadership Cable attesting that constructing the dock and mooring of boats at the cable crossing is acceptable. 5. That the conditions as setforth in the permits issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Permit NO. 199101999819 (LP-LS) and Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Regulation (Permit NO. DF-403-91) be met. f`[ Findings of Fact COA 8-157B Page 2 6 . That prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant obtains the appropriate license agreements from the City for the use of the right-of-way, and provides a hold harmless agreement which is acceptable to the City Attorney. Docks without superstructures, (e.g. gazebos or boathouses) do not require design approval from the Historic Preservation Board. This COA was approved with conditions, for minor site plan modification only. The vote was 5-0. Patricia Cayce Historic Preservation Planner AGENDA ITEMS HPB MEETING FEBRUARY 19, 1992 DATE: FEBRUARY 13, 1992 TO: HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD FROM: PAT CAYCE SUBJECT: PROPOSED PATIO SHOPPES, 714 E.ATLANTIC AVENUE DIGBY BRIDGES, AGENT. BURTON HANDELSMAN, OWNER. The Planning and Zoning Department has received a request for conditional use and site plan approval for the Patio Shoppes. The development proposal involves the construction of an 11,736 sq. ft. two story building which will house a restaurant,retail shops and offices. The land is now vacant. The proposed Patio Shoppes will be located at the southwest corner of Palm Square and E. Atlantic Avenue. The property is located within the Marina Historic District and is within two zoning districts: the proposed building will occupy Lots 4 thru 8 and 45 and 46, which are zoned CBD. the parking lot for the project will be situated on Lots 42 thru 44 which are zoned RM. Because the rear lots are zoned RM, which does not allow private parking lots, a petition to rezone the property to CF is necessary. The petition will be proposed along with the conditional use/site plan requests. The conditional use action is to allow the establishment of a private parking lot within the proposed CF zone district. The COA for design evaluation and site plan approval will come to the HPB at a later date. Action requested at this meeting: Consider a recommendation to the P & Z Board: regarding the rezoning of Lots 42 thru 44 of Block 125, Palm Square Unregistered, from RM to CF regarding the conditional use to allow a private parking lot within the proposed CF zone district 1 i 1 • SITE PLAN NORTH '1"s20 —0 4 • w 5 w t a . • .•:.........„:•......:•i::::•:.:: :,:.:....• .,.......,::::::::: ::.:::::.:::::::::.:•::::.:::::.::::::::::T:::::...::::.::,..:.:::.:::::.:i:: :::•:::,...:•: :::•. • • ...••••,:•..:.....;•:,•:::::..:1:...::::::.::j.::::::iii::::.:U : ;::::.:1;.....;......: :::.:.,...:::.:;.:;.:...:.:::.::::.....:::::: ..:.::.:.:,:i.:.:::::::.:-... U :1 ;t: t. ,: Z nn 6 -� O C zo i t 4g • LO TS g 7 46 tS <:i: : :»::'`:<? :`< :>>: < 'f5isisc?:- .':i:> ; iji?> ` ':: • i . ::>: i fI 4 7 4 6 1 • t \ .a.—_-- - - -- ::::::::•:: ::$.!111.1:•..:ii';:i.ipillii!!iiFi.:1•1::. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::;;.;:•.:::::iii.i.ii.....j.: :::.:•:.:.::;::.::6::•.: :: ::•:.•:•:•:.':.:.'.':- 8 • . __a_____8_,_y _tl ,PALM STREET Z6NING SITE PLAN_ . MEMORANDUM DATE: FEBRUARY 20, 1992 TO: THE PLANNING & ZONING BOARD FROM: PAT CAYCE ISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER SUBJECT: REZONING AND CONDITIONAL USE FOR THE PROPOSED PATIO SHOPPES, 714 E. ATLANTIC AVENUE At its meeting of February 19, 1992 the Historic Preservation Board voted to recommend approval of: * rezoning Lots 42 thru 44 of Block 125, Palm Square Unregistered, from RM to CF * granting a conditional use to allow a private parking lot within the proposed CF zone district. Lots 42 thru 44 are located within the Marina Historic District. The vote was 5-0. PALM SQUARE - MARINE WAY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA February 17, 1992 REPLY TO: 65 Palm Square Delray Beach, FL 33483 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE DELRAY BEACH PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD: The members of the Palm Square-Marine Way Homeowners Association have reviewed the plans for the development of the southwest corner of Atlantic Avenue and Palm Square. In order to accomodate this added burden of traffic and parking in a historical residential area, we hope every effort will be made to gain access to Seventh Avenue and to close Palm Square between the residential and the commercial zoned areas. The development of Brandy's and elimination of the "No Left Turns" at Atlantic Avenue and Palm Square are causing a tremendous increase in the traffic through the Marina Historic District. In addition, Brandy's is now creating a large sidewalk cafe on Marine Way and in the future will , no doubt, open second and third floor. As you know, Mr. Handelsman has submitted plans for a two-story, 11,376 square foot building on the corner of Palm Square and Atlantic Avenue. The building will house stores, offices, andf restaurants including a sidewalk cafe. The small number of parking spaces indicated will never be adequate for that number of businesses. An added problem will be trucks unloading on Atlantic Avenue. The overflow will park on the streets throughout the neighborhood. We want commercial development but the neighborhoods deserve consideration. Come and look at the area. Almost every parking space is filled at Brandy's, the Park, and Atlantic Plaza at noon and in the evening when the Paddleboat goes out and the stores and restaurants are operating. With access to Seventh Avenue, traffic could be routed to the city parking lot next to Victorio's and behind Best Western; all through commercially zoned areas, not resi- dential . Traffic could be kept out of the neighborhoods and would have access to both lanes of U.S. #1 via the traffic light at Seventh Avenue and Atlantic Avenue. Please give this problem serious consideration when you review this project. Ver truly yours, ce, i/Lez<71 AFda . R'ley Dr ge R b cc: Mayor and City Commission a�. Bowen City Manager Traffic Manager • ----- - ---, Sun-Sentinel, Sunday, Fe-b�ru'ary 16, 1992 ( `i� ;,4f `F� s 1 ` ,. .af^ ' -:',,it-,a fir\"" i .. !Y � , i ....1.4rM `,4�g r :S"�7 I:-_ : •`: t mil. A,� x g ,1 ''�? ,, i rri 1-;,* �. �7.�t '"r O� _-!"1 ...:1 1`,1` ry- V - ,....4,„,,,,,..,::...• ,_ „:::: ,..., . 4. ..°,..tki• • ' . ' Cr"' :,--"". `tig /i t.:1 0 }r w,rv. 'R.,k. ram. i Y • .. - _ .A 2 {k I .t#i ��} _ '+mil 4''>(} ��ra -�) 1 .4 .', „_..„..,.,..,l I --,-54. --,‘'.4.t*..4%.1t..'-i—N ,r f r)/ t i- in•w �:`i l` x, J' Y 1 ', t �z`1 tf�, n . .��v�li •l�1�: ' .i1c T'�' c.` e .11 i 4'� " g� ..�.kTt `I *'•, ii�•�t �f"'s' `'",•.' '� F - se r 1 e f'y ` r . ifs +CE•..••••i•• ASP Z l '��'`- 'u 4 �4= `i F �.r Li � } .F d �. Z 'el.-- T r it`� b 1p,,r� Y �; 3 *b* ,p �`�' 40 yy+L `..r t � h, �^ . rP l f,,.,'A¢ r, n,. r `., 1 ^r am q k .4..•� n 'g•ta - 3 �s. ... 4,w 1, 7�[--^^•-�—` � h '~t A ♦ -tikes tr,�{i., `°•Y ,� ��� �.c '`l:.� ;ter t ;` � �:-*f 1fti 1.r 2 t a .. a 'Fyn 4• "` ,o.++ t7t� �'""a v. t- • ' - t ryy,r i� {;.• i sr f �r++['..aY,. t=�rt.F$i• +P•y�*'''� "LL4.., +i :c. . �:�s•,-Y.•s .�ti,... ..-4. ,- st"i-;. • .+s�;;*.1!*Fa T�'-'"'t_"��+'�f�R:"r•S•��'; ,-. 'q. Staff photo/MARK RANDALL The Terrimore house may become a restaurant,offices or a bed and breakfast. s1 : Fflfl ' a1oW • sale IIIIP $200,000 wanted for Terrimore propertyat Four Corners This is the first installment of an occasion- Four Corners, as local preservationists purchaser to open an intimate upscale res- al series on historic preservation in Palm call it, is being used for the purpose its taurant," he said, adding that four buyers Beach County. builders had in mind.Yet just having these have toured it in the past 60 days. All are buildings around when so many others looking at opening a restaurant, office have been torn down is victory enough, By MICHAEL KORETZKY space or returning it to an inn. Stan Writer says Pat Casce, the city's preservation "It's a special and unique property which planner. requires a special and unique purchaser," DELRAY BEACH — The more things Casce is especially happy to see preser- he said."The kinds of buyers who look at it stay the same, the more they change. vation-minded buyers express interest in have great appreciation for aesthetics and Nowhere in Palm Beach County is that Terrimore, which has been in foreclosure beauty and have a vision of what they can more apparent than at the "four corners" since last year, when a bed-and-breakfast do with that building." of Swinton Avenue and Northeast First inn shut down. That may sound like real-estate agent ' Street, where preservationists have sue- "It's a very important structure," she hype, but Casce said Terrimore warrants ceeded in keeping a handful of impressive said. Built in 1926, "it's a bungalow that the praise. old buildings looking as new as the day has most of its original elements,especial- "The house has a lot of interesting histo- they were built. ly its windows, and the restoration [in ry,"she said. "It was built by a prominent 1 But there's an obvious irony:The old ele- 1989J was wonderfully done. And now all member of the early community." mentary and high school is now Old School the four corners are anchored,so it's real- That person was John R. Cason Jr.,who Square,a community center and arts com- ly great." local historians refer to as "Delray plex; the Cason Cottage is a museum; the Real estate agent Sandy Simon, an ac- Beach's first permanent doctor." house across the street is an attorney's of- tive preservationist himself, is selling the Cason himself would be surprised to see ' fice; and Terrimore, a huge 1920s bunga- two-story, 2,686-square-foot home for his residential neighborhood these days. low, is on the verge of becoming a First Southern Bank, which took over the But Simon and Casce say they are proud of rant. house last year. Asking price: $200,000. the way small businesses are keeping his- of the buildings at this historic "We are negotiating with a prospective tory alive. " 1 February 11, 1992 Pat Cacye Historic Preservation Officer City of Delray Beach Dear Pat, It is with deep regret that I submit my resignation from the Historic Preservation Board. But due to an increase demand on my time from my job I find it necessary. I cannot devote the time necessary to do a good job therefor would appreciate your passing this resignation on the the proper people. I have enjoyed serving on the Board and wish the continuing members all the success it can achieve. $: c Si Wi •yers