The URL can be used to link to this page

HPB 03-18-1992 AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING WEDNESDAY, MARCH 18, 1992 6 : 00 PM COMMISSION CHAMBERS, CITY HALL Please be advised that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceeding is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S.286 . 0105 . 1 . Roll Call 2 . Public Hearing: Request for Variance No. 88-25: Digby Bridges, Architect, Authorized Agent for Patio Associates Limited Partnership, Burton Handelsman, Owner. Lots 4 thru 8 and -Lots 42 thru 46 of Block 125 Palm Square Unregistered. The property is located on the south west corner of E. Atlantic Avenue and Palm Square. 3 . COA 8-172 Patio Shoppes 714 E. Atlantic Avenue. Digby Bridges Authorized Agent for Patio Associates Limited Partnership, Burton Handelsman, Owner. A. Site Plan Approval B. Landscaping C. Exterior Design 4 . COA 8-175 310 N. Swinton Avenue Dean Hoffman, Owner. Consider existing chain link fence in the front yard. 5 . COA 8-166C Renaissance Dental Studio 503 N.E. 2nd Avenue Jay Kunze, Owner. Consider a change to approved west elevation to allow a decorative metal gate at the entrance to the breezeway. 6 . Approval of the Minutes of the February 5, 1992 Meeting Historic Preservation Board Agenda March 18, 1992 Page 2 7 . Reports From Historic Districts 8 . Unfinished Business 9 . New Business 10 . Adjournment FORM 4 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT LAST NAME-FIRST NAME-MIDDLE NAME CAMPBELL, KENNETH WAYNE THE BOARD, COUNCIL,COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE ON WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF: --AILING ADDRESS 314 NORTH SWINTON AVE Y HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY 0 COUNTY O OTHER LOCAL AGENCY O STATE CITY COUNTY DELRAY BEACH, FL PALM BEACH NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OR STATE AGENCY DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED 3-18-92 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH NAME OF BOARD.COUNCIL.COMMISSION,AUTHORITY,OR COMMITTEE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD WHO MUST FILE FORM 4 This form is for use by any person serving on either an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee, whether state or local,and it applies equally to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are faced with a voting conflict of interest. As the voting conflict requirements for public officers at the local level differ from the requirements for state officers,this form is divided into two parts: PART A is for use by persons serving on local boards(municipal,county,special tax districts,etc.),while PART B is prescribed for all other boards, i.e., those at the state level. PART C of the form contains instructions as to when and where this form must be filed. PART A VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS [Required by Section 112.3143(3), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).] The Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees PROHIBITS each municipal, county, and other local public officer FROM VOTING in an official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to the special gain of any principal(other than a government agency as defined in Section 112.312(2), Florida Statutes) by whom he is retained. In any such case a local public officer must disclose the conflict: NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR (a) PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of his interest in the matter on which he is abstaining from voting;and (b) WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by describing the nature of his interest as a public record in this part below. NOTE:Commissioners of a Community Redevelopment Agency created or designated pursuant to Section 163.356 or Section 163.357, Florida Statutes(Supp. 1984),or officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one-acre,one-vote basis are not prohibited from voting. In such cases, however, the oral and written disclosure of this part ✓mmust� Qbemade. I, the undersigned local public officer, hereby disclose that on102i4 "` /(f , 19 (a) I abstained from voting on a matter which (check one): inured to my special private gain; or inured to the special gain of , by whom I am retained. CE FORM 4-REV. 1044 PAGE I (b)The measure on which I abstained and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: DEAN HOFFMAN APPLIED TO PUT UP A CHAIN LINK FENCE IN FRONT OF HIS HOUSE HE IS MY NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR AND I FEEL IF I VOTED IT WOULD CAUSE FUTURE PROBLEMS „SINCE MY VOTE WOULD BE NO TO HIS APPLICATION REQUEST. 3- /1 9-2 - Date Filed %ig I ature Please see PART C for instructions on when and where to file this form. PART 13 VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR STATE OFFICERS [Required by Section 112.3143(2), Florida Statutes(Supp. 1984).] Each state public officer is permitted to vote in his official capacity on any matter. However,any state officer who votes in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain or the special gain of any principal by whom he is retained is required to disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in Part B below within 15 days after the vote occurs. I, the undersigned officer of a state agency, hereby disclose that on , 19 . (a) I voted on a matter which(check one): -inured to my special private gain; or -inured to the special gain of , by whom I am reta< (b) The measure on which I voted and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: C Date Filed Signatuic Please see PART C below for instructions on when and where to file this form. PART C FILING INSTRUCTIONS This memorandum must be filed within fifteen(15)days following the meeting during which the voting conflict occurred with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting,who shall incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes.This form need not be filed merely to indicate the absence of a voting conflict. NOTICE:UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTESf 112317(1983),A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT. REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT. DEMOTION.REDUCTION IN SALARY.REPRIMAND.OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED$5.000. MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD PUBLIC HEARING WEDNESDAY, MARCH 18, 1992 LOCATION: COMMISSION CHAMBERS 100 N.W. 1ST AVENUE DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444 1. ROLL CALL: The Vice Chairman called the meeting to order at 6 : 00 P.M. Board Members : Christine Bull Present Wayne Campbell (Vice Chairman) Present Daniel Carter Present Sandy Jamison Present Pat Healy-Golembe Absent Buck Miller Present Rose Sloan (Chairman) Absent Staff Members Present: Jeff Costello, Planning & Zoning Department Janet Meeks, Planning & Zoning Department Diana Mund, Planning & Zoning Department Susan Ruby, City Attorney's Office 2 . Variance No. 88-25 : Patio Shoppes, 714 E. Atlantic Avenue. Burton Handelsman, Owner; Digby Bridges, Authorized Agent. The Board voted to approve Variance No. 88-25 based upon positive findings pursuant to Section 2 .4 . 7 (A) (5) and 4 .5 . 1(J) : a. Approve the variance request from Section 4 .4 .21(H) to reduce the setback from 10 ' to 5 ' along the east property line. b. Approve the variance request from Section 4 .6 .4 (E) , to reduce the setback from 10 ' to 8 ' along the west property line and 10 ' to 5 ' along the east property line. The approval is subject to City Commission action on the Palm Square road closure issue. The Board' s action is conditioned with the caveat that all the approvals granted are subject to any conditions imposed by the City Commission with regard to the closure of Palm Square. Daniel Carter moved for approval of Variance No. 88-25, seconded by Sandy Jamison. The vote was as follows: Christine Bull - Yes; Wayne Campbell - Yes; Daniel Carter Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - No. Said motion passed 4-1. 3 . COA 8-172 : Patio Shoppes, 714, E. Atlantic Avenue. Burton Handelsman, Owner; Digby Bridges, Authorized Agent. The Board voted to approve the following waiver requests from the applicant: * Reduce the right-of-way width from 60 ' to 40 ' . * Eliminate the sidewalk from the edge of the parking lot to the south property line with a treatment similar to Brandy's . * Recommend approval to the City Commission regarding the waiver request from Section 4 . 6 . 16 (H) (3) (d) to reduce the required 5 ' landscape strip along the west property line adjacent to the north parking lot to 4 ' . The Board voted to approve the Site Plan with the following conditions: * That a plat be recorded for the subject property to include the necessary easements as outlined in the staff report. * Provide the overhead power lines underground pursuant to Section 6 .3 . 8. The Board' s action is conditioned with the caveat that all the approvals granted are subject to any conditions imposed by the City Commission with regard to the closure of Palm Square. Sandy Jamison moved for approval of COA 8-172-A (Site Plan Approval) , seconded by Christine Bull. The vote was as follows : Christine Bull - Yes; Wayne Campbell - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - No. Said motion passed 4-1. The Board voted to approve the landscape plans based upon positive findings pursuant to Section 4 . 6 . 16 with minor modifications as to types plantings . The Board' s action is conditioned with the caveat that all the approvals granted are subject to any conditions imposed by the City Commission with regard to the closure of Palm Square. - 2 - 3/18/92 Daniel Carter moved for approval of COA 8-172-B (Landscaping) , seconded by Sandy Jamison. The vote was as follows : Christine Bull - Yes; Wayne Campbell - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - Yes . Said motion passed 5-0 . The Board voted to approve the Elevations based on positive findings pursuant to Section 4 .6 . 18 . The Board's action is conditioned with the caveat that all the approvals granted are subject to any conditions imposed by the City Commission with regard to the closure of Palm Square. Sandy Jamison moved for approval of COA 8-172-C (Exterior Design) , seconded by Daniel Carter. The vote was as follows : Christine Bull - Yes; Wayne Campbell - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - Yes. Said motion passed 5-0 . 4 . COA 8-175 : 310 N. Swinton Avenue. Dean Hoffman, Owner. Note: Wayne Campbell chose to abstain from voting on COA 8-175 due to personal conflict as applicant is his neighbor. Sandy Jamison moved for denial of COA 8-175, seconded by Buck Miller. The vote was as follows : Christine Bull - No; Wayne Campbell - Abstained; Daniel Carter - No; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - Yes . Said motion was 2-2 . Upon second motion the Board recommended approval of COA 8-175 with the following condition: * The 6 ' high chain link fence in the front be removed and replaced with a 4 ' high fence that is in keeping with the Design Guidelines . Daniel Carter moved for approval of COA 8-175, seconded by Christine Bull . The vote was as follows : Christine Bull - Yes; Wayne Campbell - Abstained; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - Yes . Said motion was passed 4-0 . 5 . COA 8-166C: Renaissance Dental Studio, 503 N.E. 2nd Avenue. Jay Kunze, Owner. The Board voted to approve COA 8-166C with the condition that the applicant paint the gate a pastel green that is in keeping with the turquoise trim on the building. - 3 - 3/18/92 Daniel Carter moved for approval of COA 8-166C, seconded by Christine Bull. The vote was as follows: Christine Bull - Yes; Wayne Campbell - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - Yes. Said motion passed 5-0. 6 . APPROVAL OF MINUTES: February 5, 1992 Meeting Sandy Jamison moved approval of the minutes for the February 5, 1992 meeting, seconded by Christine Bull. The vote was as follows : Christine Bull - Yes; Wayne Campbell - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - Yes . Said motion passed 5-0 . 7 . REPORTS FROM HISTORIC DISTRICTS: None 8 . UNFINISHED BUSINESS: None 9 . NEW BUSINESS: The Board felt that they need to seriously look at the Closing of Palm Square in the very near future when all of the Board Members are present. 10 . Sandy Jamison moved for adjournment at 7 : 30 P.M. , seconded by Daniel Carter. The vote was as follows : Christine Bull - Yes; Wayne Campbell - Yes; Daniel Carter - Yes; Sandy Jamison - Yes; Buck Miller - Yes. Said motion passed 5-0 . Next meeting is scheduled for April 1, 1992 . The undersigned is the Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for March 18, 1992, which were formally ado to and ap ved byYthe Board on � \ \ , 1992 . Diana and If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes . - 4 - 3/18/92 ' ' HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD `CITY OF DELRAY BEACH --- STAFF REPORT --- TING DATE: March 18, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: 2 & 3 ITEM: Variance No. 88-25 & COA 8-172 - Patio Shoppes • - I ) `,l_, I I I ' I I J 1 1 ATLANTIC AVENUE / wow 4•U4►4E- jv XAM O Q _ w `=� Z a i ENERAL DATA: Owner Patio Associates Limited Agent Digby Bridges, Marsh & Assoc. Location On the west side of Palm Street, between Atlantic Avenue and S.E. 1st Street. Property Size 0 665 Acres City Land Use Plan Commercial Core & Medium Density 5-12 du/acre City Zoning CF (Community Facilities) and CBD (Central Business District) Adjacent Zoning North: CBD East: RM, CBD, and CF South: RM and CBD West: RM and CBD Existing Land Use Vacant Proposed Land Use Construction of a 11,736 sqft. commercial building. Water Service Existing 8" water main along the north side of Atlantic Avenue, and an existing 2" line along Palm Street. Sewer Service Existing 20" sanitary sewer line along Atlantic Avenue, and an existing 8" line along the rear of lots 4,5,6,7 and 8. ti ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD: The item before the Board is that of consideration of the following aspects of a development proposal for the Patio Shoppes : * Variances (#88-25) * Site Plan * Landscaping * COA 8-172 * Architectural Elevations The subject property is located on the west side of Palm Square, between East Atlantic Avenue and S.E. 1st Street, within the Marina Historic District. BACKGROUN D: Lots 42 and 43 once contained a residential structure. In 1979 , the structure was damaged by fire and was subsequently demolished. Since then, these two lots have remained vacant. Lot 44 contained a portion of the parking lot associated with the Patio Delray Restaurant, which was located along Atlantic Avenue. In 1986, a site plan and conditional use request was submitted to the City. The site plan proposed to renovate and convert the existing 11,434 sq. ft. restaurant into a 12,046 sq. ft. three story structure containing a mix of a restaurant, retail shops and offices. The conditional use request was to allow associated parking on lots 42 and 43, which were zoned RM-10 . At its meeting of April 14 , 1986, the Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval of the site plan and conditional use request for Patio Delray subject to conditions. During the meeting there was lengthy discussion with regard to the traffic and parking situation. At the City Commission level, discussions continued with respect to alternatives to provide the required parking. The item was then referred to committee and there is no record of any disposition. In 1989, the restaurant was demolished after being damaged by fire. At its meeting of February 25, 1992, the City Commission approved a conditional use request and rezoning from RM (Medium Residential) to CF (Community Facilities) to allow a parking lot. The parking lot is to be utilized in conjunction with the Patio Shoppes . The attendant site plan is now before the Board for final action. The final action involves variances and waivers which include the following: HPB Staff Report Patio Shoppes Page 2 Variance: * Section 4 .4 .21(H) CF Zone District, within the front yard setback and any street side setback area, the first 10 ' abutting the right-of-way shall be a landscaped area. The applicant is providing 5 ' instead of the required 10' setback. * Section 4 . 6 .4 (E) Where CF Zoning abuts residential zoning a minimum of 10 ' landscape area shall be provided. Along the west property line only 8 ' has been provided. Along the east property line only 5 ' has been provided. Waivers : * Section 5 . 3 . 1(D) (2) , 60 ' of right-of-way is required for a Local Street. Reduction in right-of-way from 60 ' to 40 ' for Palm Square. * Section 6 . 3 . 1(B) , Sidewalks for commercial purposes are required to be 5 ' in width. Reduction in sidewalk width from 5 ' to 4 ' . PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The development proposal is to construct two structures connected with the roof, totaling 11,736 sq. ft. on the site of the former Patio Delray Restaurant. The applicant states that uses include shops and a restaurant on the first floor with one outdoor patio seating area for the restaurant and on the second floor are offices or artist studios . The ingress/egress to the site is from Palm Square. The parking lot accommodates 41 parking spaces . Along the west and south property lines, a 6 ' solid masonry wall will be provided along with associated landscaping. SITE PLAN ANALYSIS REQUIRED FINDINGS: (Chapter 3) Pursuant to Section 3 . 1 . 1 (Required Findings) , prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, the staff report, or minutes . Findings shall be made by the body which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to the following four areas . HPB Staff Report Patio Shoppes Page 3 Future Land Use Map: The use or structures must be allowed in the zoning district and the zoning district must be consistent with the land use designation. A portion of the property (Lots 42,43 & 44) has a CF zone designation. CF (Community Facilities) is deemed compatible with all land use designations shown on the Future Land Use Map. The balance of the property is zoned CBD (Central Business District) . CBD is deemed compatible with the Commercial Core designation on the Future Land Use Map. Concurrency: Facilities which are provided by, or through, the City shall be provided to new development concurrent with issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. These facilities shall be provided pursuant to levels of service established within the Comprehensive Plan. Water: Water service to the site exists via a 2" main located along the east side of Palm Square and an 8" main located along Atlantic Avenue. The 2" main extends from S.E. 1st Street and terminates 100 ' south of Atlantic Avenue. The 2" main is not sufficient to provide adequate fire suppression to the site. The upgrading of the 2" main to an 8" main will be required. There was a proposal to extent the main with the Brandy' s site and development plan. However, that was deferred until there was a need to provide fire suppression. The proposed main extension and fire hydrant associated with Brandy' s will be installed as a part of this site plan action. The 8" main will run along the east side of Palm Square terminating north of the Brandy' s entrance at a fire hydrant. A 2" domestic line will be extended west from the fire hydrant to service the proposed Patio Shoppes building. Sewer: An existing 8" sanitary sewer main is located along Palm Square and along the rear of lots 4,5,6,7,& 8 . No sewer main upgrading or extensions will be required with the overall development proposal. The survey provided does not indicate that there is a utility easement which covers the existing main. Drainage: Drainage will be accommodated on-site through the provision of an exfiltration system and swales . • HPB Staff Report Patio Shoppes Page 4 Streets and Traffic: The preliminary traffic study indicates that the development meets concurrency. However, final approval will be required by Palm Beach County since the projected traffic volumes exceed 1,000 ADTs . The traffic study as submitted, indicates that there will be 188 trips utilizing the driveway during the peak hours . There appears to be a disparity between the number of provided parking spaces and what will actually be needed to handle the amount of traffic for the intended uses. It should be noted that parking requirements in the CBD are generally less stringent than elsewhere in the City. This reduction is predicated upon the following: a) the availability of nearby public parking, b) the tendency of people who work downtown to walk to shopping located within a few blocks, c) a substantial amount of pedestrian traffic coming from business where the customer leaves their vehicle in one lot. There are several deficiencies in the traffic report and it will need to be corrected. The Director has allowed processing to continue even though the report has those deficiencies . Parks , Open Space Solid Waste: Commercial developments are not required to provide park dedication fees . A double wide dumpster has been provided to accommodate solid waste. A development of this size will have a minimal impact upon the land fills . Consistency: Compliance with the performance standards set forth in Section 3 . 3 .3 along with the required findings in Sections 2 .4 .5(F) (5) (General Compatibility and Harmony with Adjacent Properties) shall be the basis upon which a finding of overall consistency is to be made. Other objectives and policies found in the adopted Comprehensive Plan may be used in making of a finding of overall consistency. Section 3 . 3 . 3 (Standards for Site Plan Actions) : The applicable performance standards of Section 3.3.3 and other policies which apply are as follows : A) Building design, landscaping, and lighting (Glare) shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to Traffic Circulation. The parking lot is designed in such a way that two dead-end parking bays are created. The parking area to the north has a potential for blockage of visibility. If the parking lot is full, a vehicle must back out in order to turn around. It may be HPB Staff Report Patio Shoppes Page 5 appropriate to provide the handicap spaces at the west end of the parking lot for the purpose of a turn around, as these spaces would not be utilized as frequently. The parking area to the south is fairly short and does not appear to have the same visibility problems . B) Appropriate separation of travelways is made for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians in a manner consistent with objective D-i of the Traffic Element. The development proposal meets the above standard by providing a very pedestrian oriented development as it relates to Atlantic Avenue. An extensive sidewalk system is provided adjacent to Atlantic Avenue which traverses through the building to the rear parking lot. Also, the sidewalk is extended along the length of the east property line. There is a clear separation for pedestrians and travelways for vehicles. No provision has been made for bicycle racks . However, they would be appropriate being that it is in an urbanized area with a minimal amount of parking spaces . Accommodating such alternative means of transportation is encouraged. C) Open space enhancements described in Open Space and Recreation Objective B-1, are appropriately addressed. Objective B-1 states that "Part of the imagery of open space is that of vistas and streetscapes" . The policies which accomplish this objective appear to apply to larger developments which can provide large open spaces and includes City street beautification programs . However, the Patio Shoppes development proposal meets this objective as well . Even though the City street beautification program is intended for "scenic drives" and pertains to the beautification of the medians, the proposal to extend the Atlantic Avenue streetscape interior to the site and along Palm Square which keeps within the theme of the street beautification program. Another policy which is "part of the imagery" states that new developments shall provide central focal points at entries and landscape buffers along the external streets which service them. The development proposal meets this criteria by providing an opening in the middle of the building where there is a view/vista to a fountain. In this case heavy landscaping is not provided, however, it is replaced with hardscape materials which is probably more appropriate given its location in an urbanized area. D) That any street widening associated with the development shall not be detrimental upon desired character and cohesiveness of affected residential area. HPB Staff Report Patio Shoppes Page 6 It was determined with the Brandy' s site plan, that the widening of Palm Square to the standard 60 ' right-of-way section, would be detrimental upon the character of the residential area to the south. This would also hold true for this development proposal . Therefore, a waiver is being requested for the reduction of right-of-way to 40 ' . E) [Development of vacant land which is zoned for residential] This standard does not apply. F) Vacant property shall be developed in a manner so that the future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations complementary to adjacent land uses . See discussion on page 5 of this report under Comprehensive Plan Policies which apply. G) [Demographic mix] This standard does not apply. Section 2 .4 .5(F) (5) (Site Plan Findings) : Pursuant to Section 2 .4 .5 (F) (5) (Findings) , in addition to provisions of Chapter Three, the approving body must make a finding that development of the property pursuant to the site plan will be compatible and harmonious with the adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole, so as not to cause substantial depreciation of property values . The subject property is located in the central business district. To the north, east and west are commercial developments . To the south and west of the south parking lot are residential uses . At the time of the conditional use request and rezoning for the parking lot, a determination was made that the CF zone district was a good buffer between the commercial uses and the residential uses . A parking lot is less intense than a commercial use abutting residential uses . The development should help as a catalyst for redevelopment in the CBD. The proposed development should attribute to an appreciation in property values in the surrounding area. Another aspect of compatibility involves congestion and traffic flows as it relates to this project. These items discussed in the following paragraphs : Congestion: The traffic study as submitted, indicates that during the morning peak hours there will be a total of 115 trips per hour and the evening peak hours there will be a total of 188 trips per hour. HPB Staff Report Patio Shoppes • Page 7 parking lot will Per the report, it can could conStaffd that the will be fewer highly congested. However, due feelst therethe availability ofr be hig Y states, vehicle trips than the report parking in downtown. Traffic Flows : an Traffic through the residential area to the south the restriction been an with this prop issue in the past. However, to make left turn movements onlso Atlantic A trial has basis been forrremovone The removal of the sign year. Commission agreed to Also, at its meeting of March 11, the City closure of Palm Square with a turn-around on Commissiio on the See attached excerpt from the City can be Commission Documentationhcpes property. A positive finding with adjacnet neighborhoods as long as the made labled "Exhibit A regarding compatiblity closure of Palm Square exists. Com liance with the Land Develo pent Re ulations: ulations shall Item identified ain the Land ddressed byDevelopment e9 the body taking final action on specifically bea land development application/request. Parkin [REF. required in the CBD is 1 space per 300 sq. ft. Parking sq. ft of gross floor There is a total of 11,73 of 41 parkingflor area whi(G)ch would parkingspaces . area which would require 40 spaces have been provided. e Site Data there is 1,332 sq. ft called out for the sidewalk area, which is located a In th t to the patio shops under the adjacent there is one addition • overhang of the second story. area may be utilized.parking spal ace,ace, 300 sq. ft. of outdoor dining wishes to increase the outdoor If the applicantoptions identified in the dining, it would require one of the attached memo from Diane Dominguez. is required Pursuant to Section 5 .3 . 1(D) (2) , 60 ' of right-of-way Square has an existing •Palm for a local collector street. proposal, this item was right-of-way of 40 ' . With the Brandy' s Pro P addressed and was determined ore reo create a more non-conforming situation with Brandy' s . The the City Engineer was inThe applicant is support of the reduction in right-of-way• westing the same reduction for the Patio Shoppes . The HPB has re authority q to waive this requirement. thelicant is Along with the reduction in right-of-way width, the app om 5 ' req o uesting uesting a reduction in the required sidewalk the 4fr width to 4 ' [REF. 6 . 3 . 1(B) ] • It is appropriate to provide d area een the that it provides additional sthee sidewalk et This area edge can be pavement for Palm Square and tilized for drainage purposes . HPB Staff Report Patio Shoppes Page 8 It may even be appropriate to eliminate the sidewalk from the edge of the parking area south. With the Brandy' s proposal the sidewalk requirement was waived. The Board may wish to discuss this at further length at the meeting when the applicant is present. Setbacks : Within the area encompassed by the boundaries of the DDA (Downtown Development Agency) , there is no required front, interior, side or street side setback. If there is no dedicated access to the rear of the building, a 10 ' setback is required [REF. 4 .4 . 13(G) (2) ] . The building setback provides a zero setback to the front, side interior and side street with access to the rear of the building. Therefore, the development proposal meets this requirement. Pursuant to Section 4 .6 .4(E) , where a CF zone district is adjacent to a residential district, whether separated by a street or alley, a special district boundary treatment is required. A landscaped setback of 15 ' ; or a landscaped setback of 10 ' and either a six foot solid masonry wall or continuous hedge at least 4 1/2 ' in height is required. The site plan indicates : * a 10 ' landscape setback with a 6 ' solid masonry wall will be provided along the south property line; * an 8 ' landscape setback with a 6 ' solid masonry wall will be provided along the west property line adjacent to the residential property, and; * a 5 ' landscape strip will be provided along the east property line (frontage along Palm Square) . With respect to the west property line, the reduction of the landscape area by 2 ' will not be a concern as a wall will be provided on the property line. Along the east property line there is approximately 50 ' which is affected by this code requirement, of that 50 ' , only 20 ' does not meet the 10 ' setback. Due to the tightness of the site, and the small area which is affected, it would be appropriate to grant a variance for the above requirement. Along with the above requirement, pursuant to Section 4 .4 .21(H) CF Zone District, within the front yard setback and any street side setback area, the first 10 ' abutting the right-of-way shall be a landscaped area. This would apply to the CF zone district which abuts Palm Square along the south parking lot. Again, it would be appropriate to grant a variance as it effects only a portion of the property along the east side. *NOTE: Attached are the applicant' s justification statements and criteria for basis of granting a variance REF:2 .4 .7 (A) , 4 .5 . 1(J) ] . • HPB Staff Report • Patio Shoppes Page 9 Building Height: , Buildings within the CBD may be up to 48 ' in height. The proposed building height is 29 ' . Therefore, this requirement has been met. Open Space: Pursuant to Section 4 . 3 .4 (K) , 25% of non-vehicular open space is required. The development provides for 32 .5% of open space. OTHE R: Plat: Through the review process, it was discovered that the Palm Square Plat was never recorded. Also, it has been identified that no utility easements have been provided to cover the FPL lines and sewer main which runs east/west behind lots 4-8 . Along the east property line, a portion of the public sidewalk is located on private property. In light of the above, it would be appropriate to plat the property in order to provide the necessary easements. The applicant has verbally agreed to plat the property. Overhead Power Lines: Pursuant to Section 6 . 1. 8 all new development is to provide utility structures such as electric power underground. There is overhead power lines which traverse the site. These lines are esthetically unpleasing and should be located underground. The applicant may request a waiver from this requirement from the City Commission. LAND S CAP E ANALYSIS Pursuant to Section 4 . 6 . 16 (H) (3) (d) a 5 ' landscape strip is required between vehicular use areas and adjacent properties . Only 4 ' has been provided at the west end of the north parking lot. The applicant has provided a justification statement which indicates that on an average this requirement has been met. The Board should make a recommendation to the City Commission regarding this waiver request. In general, the proposal meets the intent of Section 4 . 6 . 16 . The parking lots are the only areas being landscaped as the building has a zero setback long the east, west and north sides therefore, no landscaping can be accommodated. It is noted that palm trees exist along Atlantic Avenue, within the street right-of-way, as part of the streetscape beautification program. HPB Staff Report Patio Shoppes Page 10 There are proposed trees located on top of the existing sanitary sewer line. These trees will need to shifted in order to not be in conflict with the utility lines . ELEVATION ANALYSIS The elevations appear to have a "Mizner" design character. The roof material is to be a terricotta barrel tile. The base of the building is to be painted a light pink with light yellow columns and white accent bands . The color combination keeps within the "Caribbean flavor" which seems to be the theme developing along Atlantic Avenue. REVIEW BY OTHERS: COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: At its meeting of March 5, 1992, the Community Redevelopment Agency reviewed and recommended approval of the site and development plan requests . With the recommendation that outside dining should be maximized in the project and that parking requirements for this additional seating be waived. DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY: This item will be presented to the DDA at its March 16 meeting. The DDA' s recommendation will be presented to the Board at its meeting. ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION: The development proposal appears to meet most of the LDR requirements and required findings . The variances and waivers are being requested in order to maximize the parking. A plat will be required to accommodate all the necessary easements . A water main extension will be required in order to provide the necessary fire suppression for the building. There is some concern over the parking and congestion, even though, the parking provided meets code requirements for the CBD. The traffic study, as submitted, indicates that there will not be enough parking to accommodate traffic at peak hours. The study does not take into account any outdoor seating which may be provided in the future. However, there is alternative parking available along Atlantic Avenue and public parking lots in the vicinity of the site. Overall, the proposed development will encourage redevelopment and revitalization to Atlantic Avenue and downtown City of Delray Beach. HPB Staff Report Patio Shoppes Page 11 ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: A. Continue with direction. B. Deny the site and development request with basis stated. C. Approve the site plan, variances, landscape plan, COA 8-172 and elevations for the Patio Shoppes . STAFF RECOMMENDATION: By separate motions : 1 . Approve of the site and development plan request for the Patio Shoppes based upon positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards) of the Land Development Regulations, policies of the Comprehensive plan and Section 2 .4 .5(F) (5) with the following waivers, variances and conditions : Variances: cc v ��- Approve the following variance request based upon positive findings pursuant to Section 2 .4 .7(A) (5) and 4 .5 . 1(J) : a. Approve the variance request from Section 4 .4 .21(H) to reduce the setback from 10 ' to 5 ' along the east property line. b. Approve the variance request from Section 4 . 6 .4 (E) , to reduce the setback from 10 ' to 8 ' along the west property line and 10 ' to 5 ' along the east property. Waiver: a. Approve the request to reduce the right-of-way width from 60 ' to 40 ' . b. Approve the request to reduce the sidewalk width from 5 ' to 4 ' ; or if appropriate, approve the elimination of the sidewalk from the edge of the parking lot to the south property line with a treatment similar to Brandy' s . c. Recommend approval to the City Commission regarding the waiver request from Section 4 .6 . 16(H) (3) (d) to reduce the required 5 ' landscape strip along the west property line adjacent to the north parking lot to 4 ' . HPB Staff Report Patio Shoppes Page 12 Conditions : a. That a plat be recorded for the subject property to include the necessary easements as outlined in this staff report. b. As appropriate, depending upon disposition of variance and waiver items . c. Provide the overhead power lines underground pursuant to Section 6 . 3 .8 . 2 . Approve the landscape plans based upon positive findings pursuant to Section 4 .6 . 16 . 3 . Approve the Elevations based upon positive findings pursuant to Section 4 . 6 . 18. Attachments : * Section 2 .4 . 7 (A) (5) and Section 4 .5 . 1( j ) * Site Plan * Justification Statements EXCERPT FROM CITY COMMISSION DOCUMENTATION (Exhibit A) TRIAL CLOSURE OF PALM SQUARE: During the Commission' s consideration of the rezoning ordinance on first reading, there were comments made about traffic flow. In response to that concern (and to petitions received from Palm Square property owners) , your staff is proposing the following on a trial basis : * The closure of Palm Square to through traffic by placing a barrier (as used in Delray Estates) across Palm Square at the scuth end of the "Brandy' s" parking lot. A hammer turn around would be provided on the proposed (CF) parking lot site until construction of the Patio Shoppes commences . * When construction commences, the turnaround and barrier would be relocated to the southwest corner of Lot 42 (this will necessitate the resident next to Brandy' s parking lot to take access from the north. If during the above period we witness greater congestion and accident history at Palm Square and Atlantic, the trial period would be terminated. If after the above periods, it is es ired to make the barrier and turn-around permanent, appropriate actions to do so will occur. Rationale: It is thought that by using the above "trial" approach, we can assess traffic flow and congestion impacts before we nave the influence of 100% operation of the Patio Shoppes and of Brandy' s Restaurant. If problems occur at this lesser level of intensity, the prohibition should be removed. If no problem arise and the increased intensity does not create problems, then the prohibition should become permanent. Arrangements to accommodate the above closings will be handled through staff contact with the property owners and through accommodations on the site plan. i ' 't L : N.E. 1ST ST. — L.;i > CD a VETERANS >- _ Q 1.Q' W . ,�; Q� Q -- z ,`\G PARK 3 — .0- P H z ATLANTIC AVENUE ) ( - !�*•lt• • ►mil.♦ W V) I— LaJ } a ( 0 oc.) _ z ~ — m Z W J >— . - a Ia. — _ .1 S.E. 1ST ST. I I--- L i LaiN Vi PATIO DELRAY — SITE PLAN — I I I i —1 I • section 4 .5 . 1 (J) (J) Historic Preservation Branded tin Section 2Variance Requests: Pursuant to the powers th Historic Preservation Board DBstrictsorll on act on Historicll Siteariance which requests , within a Historicthe Board of Adjustments . In otherwise would be acted upon bythe acting on such variancer�heests the criteriaBnormallylused byithe by following in addition to of Adjustments . ( 1) That a variance is necessary to maintain the historic character of property through demonstrating that: (a) A variance would not be Wonfrar to the public interest, safety, or (b) Special conditions and circumstances exist, because of the historic setting, location, nature, or character of the land, structure, • appurtenance, sign, or building involved, which are not applicable to other land— structures, appurtenances, signs, buildings in the same zoning district, which have not been designated as historic sites or a historic district nor listed on the Local Register of Historic Places . (c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of existing ordinances would alter the historic character of the historic district, or historic site to such an extent that it would not be feasible to preserve the historic character, of the historic district or historic site. (d) The variance requested mum the necessary toomaintain the preservation historic character of a historic site or of a historic district. (2) The Board shall findings e follow asofltherBoadudreof impose conditions, and make as Adjustments . BASIS FOR VARIANCES Pursuant to Section 2 . 4 .7 (A) (5) , the Historic Preservation Board must make the following findings prior to granting a variance: (A) That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or buildi.ig involved and which are not generally applicable to other lands, structures, or ing The matter of buildings subject not constitute a nbasis ( economic for the gr nting ofa hardship variance) ; e tions (B) That literal interpretation rghts 1 ommonlyhenjoyeda would the applicantby other properties subject to the same zoning; (C) That the special conditions and circumstances have not resulted from actions of the applicant; (D) That granting the variance will not confer into the applicant any special privilege that is denied to other lands , structures, and buildings under the same zoning. Neither the permitted, nor nonconforming use, of neighborhood lands , structures, or buildings under the same zoning shall be considered grounds for the issuance of a variance; (E) That the reasons set forth in the variance petition justify the granting of the variance, and that the variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure; and, (F) That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with general purpose and intent of existing regulations, will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Pursuant to Section 4 .5 . 1(J) , in addition to the above criteria, in acting on varianc requests the Board shall also be guided by the following: ( 1) That a variance is necessary to maintain the historic character of property through demonstrating that: (a) A variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare. 1 rays lv pp- (b) Special conditions and circumstances exist, because of the historic setting, location, nature, or character of the land, structure, appurtenance, sign, or building involved, which are ena not applicable a to other lands, structures, app buildings in the same zoning district, which have not been designated as historic sites or a historic district nor listed on the Local Register of Historic Places . (c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of existing ordinances would alter the historic site to such an extent that it would not be feasible to preserve the historic character, of the historic district or historic site. essary (d) The variance requeste tions ofhe minimum the historicc character to maintain the preserva of a historic site or a historic district. T;SUNLOT3 .DOC PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMBERS FROM: DIANE DOMINGUEZ, PLANNER III DATE: MARCH 10, 1992 RE: ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO PARKING FOR OUTDOOR SEATING AREA - PATIO SHOPPES The purpose of this memo is to clarify the options which are available for addressing a potential parking shortage at the Patio Shoppes development. Plans which were initially submitted for review indicated that outdoor seating would be available in the courtyard adjacent to the ground floor restaurants . Staff noted at the time that the parking shown on the plan was not sufficient to accommodate both the areas under roof and the outside seating area. Subsequently, we have had additional discussion with the project architect regarding this issue. The architect has indicated that the outdoor area which might be used for seating is approximately 600 square feet in size. Under the CBD parking requirements, one parking space must be provided for each 300 square feet of floor area. Therefore, two parking spaces would have to be provided for this use in addition to those required for the uses inside of the building. The existing site plan provides 41 parking spaces for the building itself, where 40 spaces are required. This leaves a shortage of 1 space if the outdoor seating area where included in the plan. According to the project architect, it is not possible to redesign the parking lot to include the additional space. The options for addressing the parking shortage are as follows : 1. Provide parking off-site. Required parking can be provided off-site on other property located within 300 feet, as long as both properties are of the same general type of zone designation. Such an arrangement would be subject to an agreement between the property owners stating that the parking shall not be transferred or sold separately from the use which it is intended to serve. Through this mechanism, the additional parking space could come from the Brandy' s lot, located across Palm Square from the subject property. To: HPB Re: Alternative Approaches to Parking for ' A Outdoor Seating Area - Patio Shoppes Page 2 2 . Provide a sidewalk cafe in conjunction with the outside seating. If tables were placed in the right-of-way as well as on the property, and if the proper permits were obtained, the outside dining area could qualify as a sidewalk cafe. The parking requirement for the entire outside area would then be waived. It should be noted, however, that this section of the sidewalk (east of 5th Avenue) is within the Florida Department of Transportation right-of-way, and would require that agency's approval as well as the City' s . 3 . Payment in-lieu of parking. In the CBD zoning district, payment can be made for parking which is required but cannot be provided on site. The payment rate is $2,500 per space. The fee must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. Fees paid in-lieu of parking must be approved by the City Commission. 4 . Accommodation as a non-impacting amendment. A special CBD parking task team may recommend that when a small scale addition is made to existing uses, a waiver be automatically granted for one to three parking spaces . If such a waiver option existed, the outdoor dining are could be added post construction of the new building and, thus, not be subject to providing additional parking or payment of an in-lieu fee. It is not known when this recommendation will be processed through the Planning and Zoning Board and on to the City Commission. 5 . Apply to the Historic Preservation Board for a variance to the parking requirement. The applicant could seek a variance from the code to provide 41 parking spaces where 42 are required. Since the property is in an historic district, this variance would be heard by the Historic Preservation Board. The applicant would be required to demonstrate why a variance is necessary for this property. The Historic Preservation Board would have to make findings relative to special conditions which exist on the land which create a hardship with respect to meeting this particular code provision. Any of these options could be acted upon at a future date, after a decision has been made as to the use of outdoor seating. Staff felt, however, that it is appropriate at this time to inform the Board and the applicant of the various alternatives, in order to allow adequate time to decide on a course of action. Digby Bridges, Marsh & Associates, P.A. • 124 N.E. 5TH AVENUE, DELRAY BEACH, FL 33483 407-278-1388 ✓� Qom. "'a 4 March 1992 Ms. Janet Meeks City of Delray Beach 100 NW 1st Street Delray Beach, FL 33444 RE: Patio Shoppes Dear Janet: In regards to Item #6 - Width of Right-of-Way, we are requesting that this remain at the existing 40' width. This is in an historical district and to increase the right-of-way width by taking a further 10' either side of the existing right-of-way would be very detrimental to the area, and in particular, to the residences to the south of the Patio Shoppes development. To leave the right-of-way at its present width is not detrimental to the area, and is more in keeping. In regards to Item #7 sidewalk of 4' width. Here, once again, there are no sidewalks in the area, with the exception of the recently installed sidewalk from Atlantic Avenue onto the renovated parking lot of Brandy's Waterfront Cafe. This is a very limited sidewalk, but it does service the area it is intended to service. Bearing in mind these aspects of the area, it is felt that a 4' sidewalk is quite adequate for the western side of Palm Square. As it is now shown on the drawing, this 4' wide sidewalk extends to the south of the Patio Shoppes site. We would be grateful if the Board would consider this sidewalk only extending from Atlantic Avenue to the northern side of the entrance way to the parking lot. This, along with the 4' width, we feel would be more appropriate for the area, and that the 4' width is quite adequate to service the said development. r .1 CK-1RT EKED ARCHITECTS -PLANNERS-LVTERIOR DESIGNERS Ou One further point we wish to clarify is that of uses. TOurtclient is requesting all uses allowed under the CBD zoning. study has been prepared presuming that both areas on the 1st floor could be small restaurants. Kind regards, Yours sincerely, DIGBY BRIDGES, MARSH & ASSOCIATES, P.A. 1 Digby C. Bridges, A.I.A. , R.I.B.A. DCB/sl Did r Bridges, Marsh & Ass' gates, P.A. ' 124 N.E. 5TH AVENUE, DELRAY BEACH, IL 33483 407-278-1388 --- --------- 2 March 1992 Ms. Janet Meeks Planning & Zoning Dept. City of Delray Beach 100 NW 1st Street Delray Beach, FL 33444 RE: Patio Shoppes Dear Janet: In regards to item 4 of your February 25th transmittal, we wish to request for a waiver on this particular aspect of the site design. It is felt that the charter of this historical district and other historic districts is brought about by a great variety of building set backs, landscape strips of various widths, parking directly off the street, etc. It is also felt that this is a minor request bearing in mind that this 5 ft. variance to the codes requirements only exists for 10 ft. of the 50 ft. of CF zoned area that is directly opposite the RM zoned area on the other side of Palm Square. One other point is taken into account regarding this request, and that is the average depth of landscaping along this 50 ft. is +14 ft. There is also a hedge along the complete length of this boundary. Bearing all these facts in mind, it is requested that the Board grant a waiver from Section 4.4.21(H) CF Zone District. Item 5 of your February 25th transmittal, we are also requesting a waiver from the Board. The same argument exists in regards tot he charter of this area as other historic areas. This is also a minor request of omitting only 2 ft. more of landscaping for a distance of 24 ft. along a boundary of 75 ft. length, where the average landscape strip is greater than 11'0" . Bearing all these facts in mind, it is requested that the Board grant a waiver from Section 4 . 6. 5 (E) where CF zoning abuts residential zoning. We feel that both these variances are the absolute minimum necessary to maintain the preservation of the historic character of the area. ., V .;:-,: ''':- ,w1), 3 1992 �,,,r,.�� ''\j(- &-/c)N 1��u CHARTERED ARCIIITEC7'S-PL4AXERS-I.\TERIOR DESIGNERS . • Dig Bridges, Marsh & Ass( '.ates, P.A. 124 N.E. 5TH AVENUE, DELRAY BEACH, FL 33483 407-278-1388 rr-S 2 March 1992 Ms. Janet Meeks Planning & Zoning Dept. City of Delray Beach 100 NW 1st Street Delray Beach, FL 33444 RE: Patio Shoppes Dear Janet: In regards to Item 2 in your transmittal of February 25, 1992 , the 4' strip of landscaping at the northwest end of the northern parking area. As this strip of landscaping is only 1' shy of the required 5' landscape strip, and it occurs only for a distance of 24'0" in relation to the overall 70' length of the boundary, and that the average depths f meetsc the landscaping intentis over of 8' in the code,depth,and we it is felt that this adequately cordially request a waiver for this 1' strip of landscaping. Items 1 and 3 have been addressed on the site plan. See adjustments to the plans. Kindest regards, Yours sincerely, DIGBY BRIDGES, MARSH & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Digby C. Bridges, A.I.A. , R.I.B.A. DCB/sl V,V • CHARTERED ARCHITECTS -PL4 HERS -INTERIOR DESIGNERS We would also like to point out that to meet those required landscape strips, that at least four parking spaces would be omitted which, in our opinion, wold be more detrimental to the area. We thank you for the help given to us on this project. Kind regards, Yours sincerely, DIGBY BRIDGES, MARSH & ASSOCIATES, P.A. 5j1i" \V\ Digby C. B dges, A. I.A. , R. I.B.A. DCB/sl • • ii • • CBD EXISTING BUILDING • r�f ini R[Y t Ll,A ; 40'0' In existing c.b.s.welt > 'v _ •_ " ar omit of(misting ab.&wail �C .4?:; :::. SHOPS.1 � iT �, 0• , l .' (OFFICES 1 ABOVE) • N - Nne of tutor(access road �6/ 24' , 7e 37ffi'r a0'0' a 0 ' �y 18' 1 /' �t• T 125.00 _ " tr. POL _ i+J i x - �-{ i grease' store �^ N • i1� ww rr ■r■+ r / / 'can wash wi hot sr concrete walk �;; r[t �t'1 Z / oold water skQPly t44 "rA" .i rt. .�Z' / •roam 1„ W \I 16' /6' I• "R•4! 2T• <\ •�8'�--}8'--� m fir% oo Ii-: t Y ;1:�0 r:. > ,� .x :, _ fir:. Q V wi „T s w tip;. 4 --i•�� Alt U p �7—' I -+4 � IA 7co act ,-.••• - L `, tr 1116.;. . ~' l' 'i AXEL t n CF ako ac CBD 7 a -- tt l`8'high c.b.s. sign(tyPJ ;:, ~ E:- H dumpater enclosure ) --.'i.-r: ' Q 10' 18' y 24' I, 22' b0' 22'• lr 24� :��••-••• ,c Z0,0, Z1,0• r �' / I +� a a .a ?? 4 existing In rk N ..__..'' .�'__:. •��.Nt. !� N .fir i+l ' �' :;; SHOPS 2 � ar• t — 7 �_ 2H / •.*: (OFFICES'2 ABOVE) �'l' •S line (xl Inc 4 ^�_ 7ct I / 26' $B' 12' 24' /T`. 83 ' t�:' it ' ' - 3" -___pair t ri■ .._.._ "-r- 'w' y r / MW Int�rtOCkl in • - •'rn in) POLE I \� ^ :.; :.'!o`�..�y., , ■ ."+Z•'"�. :: '..T.► = r 40'0' . '.fir.., (. __ w r r■■r ■ ■ r; a•.' .:.25: aiCe.� ` 'i i. 'i!.r . .: ...'. !.. 'i'.a`. • �.. �' !� .:.i.. ► i LOAD fiG ONLY a0 8 1 III' k'�MNr JL■St�.�X new 4'concrete sidewalk loading bey slgk _ PALM SQUARE _ _ _ • • • - ElORANCE TO BRANDY'I S� I 'PARKING AREA / I t I I- —I ,el-;. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMBERS FROM: JANET MEEKS, PLANNER IIc t , DATE: MARCH 16, 1992 RE: PATIO SHOPPES Mrs . Alieda Riley of the Palm Square - Marine Way Homeowners Association, requested that the attached information regarding the closure of Palm Square be forwarded to the Board as additional information for the Wednesday, March 18, 1992 meeting. JM/dlm Attachment: * Petitions PALM SQUARE - MARINE WAY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA February 17, 1992 REPLY TO: 65 Palm Square Delray Beach, FL 33483 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE DELRAY BEACH PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD: The members of the Palm Square-Marine Way Homeowners Association have reviewed the plans for the development of the southwest corner of Atlantic Avenue and Palm Square. In order to accomodate this added burden of traffic and parking in a historical residential area, we hope every effort will be made to gain access to Seventh Avenue and to close Palm Square between the residential and the commercial zoned areas. The development of Brandy's and elimination of the "No Left Turns" at Atlantic Avenue and Palm Square are causing a tremendous increase in the traffic through the Marina Historic District. In addition, Brandy's is now creating a large sidewalk cafe on Marine Way and in the future will , no doubt, open second and third floor. As you know, Mr. Handelsman has submitted plans for a two-story, 11,376 square foot building on the corner of Palm Square and Atlantic Avenue. The building will house stores, offices, andf restaurants including a sidewalk cafe. The small number of parking spaces indicated will never be adequate for that number of businesses. An added problem will be trucks unloading on Atlantic Avenue. The overflow will park on the streets throughout the neighborhood. We want commercial development but the neighborhoods deserve consideration. Come and look at the area. Almost every parking space is filled at Brandy's, the Park, and Atlantic Plaza at noon and in the evening when the Paddleboat goes out and the stores and restaurants are operating. With access to Seventh Avenue, traffic could be routed to the city parking lot next to Victorio's and behind Best Western; all through commercially zoned areas, not resi- dential . Traffic could be kept out of the neighborhoods and would have access to both lanes of U.S. #1 via the traffic light at Seventh Avenue and Atlantic Avenue. Please give this problem serious consideration when you review this project. Veer truly yours, t Ali1.aN Rily Dr. C. ob ;,,,,mot cc: Mayor and City Commission mme -C. Bowen City Manager Traffic Manager eL�,n0;3) koopes /ie PALM SQUARE - MARINE WAY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA RECEIVED FE8 2-4 1992 RERtYccMMISSION JANUARY 9, 1992 ATTACHED PLEASE FIND COPIES OF PETITIONS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA WHO BELIEVE THAT IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE QUALITY OF LIIE IN THE RESIDENTIALLY ZONED MARINA HISTORIC DISTRIC, PALM SQUARE SHOULD BE CLOSED AT THE NORTH END BETWEEN THE COMMERCIAL AND THE REIDENTIAL AREA, WITH A TURN AROUND. r //tee;e-ZCC. ALIEDA N. RILEY, CHAIRPERSON THE ORIGINALS WERE GIVEN TO MR. HARDEN ON JANUARY 9, 1992 WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, BELIEVE THAT IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE RESIDENTIALLY - ZONED MARINA HISTORIC DISTRICT, PALM SQUARE SHOULD BE CLOSED AT THE NORTH END BETWEEN THE COMMERCIAL AND THE RESIDENTIAL AREA, WITH A TURN AROUND. DATE NAME ADDRESS //SP/ gg-AA_ /(1.9- g rs-Lo 3 3 &(__ - 'I JiLLKSZAkP,j( Re-LA*4- 3 -3 c'Pc. 1 - < ( If * b 1 - - tiz. J � 707 71i211-• - 4 - 2_ 7i1Sr:,.-:LIL 419 6..&w, - ‘9,21rxi/di-i-cajc- --- 9z_ 3o v 7(9 �. (441 / rn zPe44,4 1020 (a wlA(rnd /2A sLi gr3 (oer - Coo [`-(ckcihe- y) ,, ,, itta.r-tie_ CA;-7 , . 7. /21 /All -C-P-<- 7- • WE THE UNDERSIGNED, RESIDENTS OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, BELIEVE THAT IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE RESIDENTIALLY ZONED MARINA HISTORIC DISTRICT, PALM SQUARE SHOULD BE CLOSED AT THE NORTH END BETWEEN THE COMMERCIAL AND THE RESIDENTIAL AREA , WITH A TURN AROUND. DATE NAME ADDRESS //1/72 (5- *X6 144/ 1 1/ 99,1-- 5�m ; l- 33165 oh'2 LA • s Y It /y` iti U 4 THE UNDERSIGNED PROPERTY HOLDER IN DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA BELIEVES THAT IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE RESIDENTIALLY - ZONED MARINA HISTORIC DISTRICT, PALM SQUARE SHOULD BE CLOSED AT THE NORTH END BETWEEN THE COMMERCIAL AND THE RESIDENTIAL AREA, WITH A TURN AROUND. DATE NAME ADDRESS 3 7 z- •ry ft A1b P/ 6 o �i4c•�t c�t,� • ti 4 JANUARY 9, 1992 • - MR . ALEXANDER CAMPBELL, WHO OWNS PROPERTY AT 53 PALM SQUARE, HAS INDICATED THROUGH HIS AGENT, MR. STEVEN BATES, THAT HE WILL BE IN AGREEMENT WITH THE MAJORITY OF THE RESIDENTS OF PALM SQUARE. • / %C..7) 7 ALIEDA N. RILEY • .P4A, M 5 Q LI 0 Si/ P3. - n rOPORK 7�e,E n ' pail vik16 ' I I ► 'eoPERT(' 1 i g K 14u4.L 1 • 9AenARA /.,.ff-(Sf fE N QAfi • - • • AGENDA ITEM 4 COA 8-175 310 N. Swinton Avenue Dean Hoffman, Owner This fence was installed without a permit or COA approval. Possible action 1. Deny the COA and have the fence removed. 2 . Approve the COA with the following modification: A. That the fence and gates be covered in wood. The wood is to be painted (specify color) and appropriate landscaping is to be planted and maintained in front of the fence. 7 APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 100 N.W. 1ST AVENUE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 The Historic Preservation Board meets on the first and third Wednesday of each month. This application must be filed 15 days prior to the next available meeting. Address of Property 3/Q 4!-S'G}/4/72 y /4UC cd,}' - 6-/?.fir Affix One Clear Picture k i 6 .',= - ---'- ' ' , If, li H : . , ItEi _ t .........4 i�.ar' �as. 1 • 4s t a r Y ti te. •-•.....• --:,....s.,_pa.,-- -:-:"..i.”.,...-,7i;-..--0..i,1-"--.--_-",..-.;•• 71,-.',-.• •.;".„--"---.:-.- .'•:-'1;:e'. r..w.----111 t.I'V''.."'liiii;.:.•- • " 4 V -wet.,0111‘111P.- I,- 1-'7•,---,...:.,'4,,N , . •il,. - --. ', -...-,,,,-;_. --...... .A t .....,.- -. ..-,,f ..-........1.t.,...,,...., ,... ...4'.• 1,- ' • . -:. -' . t t-t: -'el-'•-..';:tr...4-ti.,,,-.'•J.,..!.,...,.•i...• 1 1,44. ' -.. ,P;•:;-z.,-::.!'...,,-, --` .. -...,, ,:,.,--"'. -. • • 1 11- ...r. .- .;_--''.-li,t`..'i,-;-:::;;,-:tir,,,-••.• ' 'i ' ''..4..f....-!‘r,,•'•• 14'.- • ' : , - • ;;;.1 ';',,-:-..-.,---!,: ::-Y.,.9,-•,-;;-.V.kc"," /..'..II' e _,. ..-.,•,,•:.: 4t., -•'.:00-- ';'"'7:- •1 -t, . 1 - ... • p4-,•:::••••*".:-..-4.vg•-‘-,P.--'\*--, .. . ' 14" 4'4'.;'!'"•.----1--_,-E-.-.:-'.'"E”'..:'•Y.; Ile:II 4,,--4 .t•:,,It•• diri--.'.:Ni:',•:„.•:.••••:,...T1-- • . -• ' Mt: lf- :.:,..,:::).,:litt.' '.‘4. / ---..-,-. ,14-P- ' ,••• .-:.1--: • .*. -, --•., :/.41e4041 4.- ... ..,-.•.,-...••-ru,..-....,:- ,:s74::t-' ,', . ,...-; ....,..-Va - .,,4 .,, ',3,4- 4'...i.'• ,!_-:-.--'.-'; 74--r;-;i:-.."41 IN)' I '....! -6'1,7::cr i'i-':'--:;':::::;,...,-._r:.:;,'Z.:::•:.!;',j):IV 'i ' '..,-;..-."4!;+f,''-- 4',e,,,. 4-.1i -.. , i...-'7:-...-,:-.. 1,-,:r..;f:-:!:•.-.:.".=,...1"..•:;;-:',.. '!.V. A . •":•-•:.,•7 cc----,-.in.„.. ,-, , -.7,, , _ 2 .•,__ _ , , t • . ...„ . . ..,- . . .)-, , .........._....... . . . • ' - •--- '•:;,--''': 07.---.-,-. -:... ':-.:.::::'-:::;:r‘.,-,t,i- -'1 - - -,;;';-./.t.,4..-...7.-.`,,..,.-`7t,f-"4r,,•:.-=:-.4<-,,.,,,t,Py,r‘;e.4,;.•6;,.:„,i1-5„-,14,.A.-t,...'-,,,L,.:.I,,.''.,S--;*:.7-,--.,:-,'.-,.‘...`..4"_,,:,'-1_-.',1.2=-'r.--, -- .•,-:-.,7.•'r'1,-.7:.4.!I':„•:,:-'i1:.-447..,,,'..-2.,4.:':,,,,.-e7,:-,.....=.,.';''7,...-:--,,../::1-2.'-".....t.F";:...•.s•;-2'"i.;,...,..7--r_.r.,t.,;,z%,-.'_i,..t'•---..,-.-,;..1-.-;'•,--',,•.:.:Li_--1.t'.".r4...:_-.-7..4.-.,_.i.y'2-=-..',.-'-:t:-.'•r-,,-,-r-..:'..„..•.-..-„'.,....,•.-.:-.-:.-:,•I;i,_.:•.----::'...,-'.._-...'-;-.-,...'-.-.,-..T4-.,,.-_':.t,.-i--i--,:';.-,::......::•:..,--..--,'N;'_J.*,.5-..•-.,.i:.i.‘,:.5•._'i.,.'.1yz0„.4pi••4.•:•,,.7,13",,...;•.'f,..:t.f;:'4,...1k,-•,7,'.,.,-.:,4t. -1:, * " 'g5 7 : - t ' •- :.- , , . .i,.;.'-•- ''..- ... ;1 4 1it l • ; - ..g=--•',..',;.•':"_--,.',..•-----7.',..,...;•..„.''-•.-..-..--.-..-‘'',,-,...,..,...:-.,„„.*7:..-,<.:...-,.4•:.:.:-.-.-..;.-,,--:7;,,":-,•,....'•,,.'.--':-7',.--,:",....-.....:,---:-.--.-...-.4.-.,-3:-.:.1...-:.------,,•----•-._-.-.L...-----=;*:'..--.-...-"-*..:.'`_:-.7W-..,..-..;..:,''-'.•.','"--'.7"!..-.-l--':0--k'..,_....I. ... !.'-'"'..!-: :' ;-,'_-,-,.,:':- -:'.-- _-.':.-'•-1:7,•,-'11.--;•'; *-1.-i6 p--,: .:r..::::.r..$.%•i-S,..5"..1-.•;,- ,•,-.--7:- •_•„•,-;.!.',.-.,!,',;..,,yt,id il ,,- t ::-:::L.'..--' .."-it-••:L:' "F,:,....•.•••:-C.';:t••-• :. .,---l.-f-2).-'7•• .,*!'..';':-,,, -'•;''-'.':--:-%-%" 7,':•-••` .., &_;--=.,-. ,..,_,*.,,..„;-.,,,•-i•-_ „•.',,•;,z,',.:.,,t,,,,,, .:.._..-.,i•-•;,,,-"s;;t,10.,' , . i.-:--i-,.' :-'-'•.-.r.44.1.--F-71,:,-C-',- --',•:• . - ..... '•.'••,.--,•.--. ,••••••••-••••„.....-.••,'.:-•-, '-. „1.......t..,,,,...41''•.,7i...,..- 17-.,: 7--...i.4,...:::::;. _-4,:-1--.--.••---,----;.:.•,•'.:-.At.ri,' - ,-'';-!;';•-1-:, :41-"•e"7-fcrt--.'tf,N7...•-','i,;-'4,..,•:4Z-',2,t4;(-,,..f,-,-;-.r7.1,-.f.7.All r ..,-.,,.. e ,,i. -.•,..-- .4‘,-,...,e,-.',..- ..q.t,.: -,. , 't,'Xt, • - --'.--1,-;,"-`-''''pe..•,.7.:;:r•-trr'A 1;4,..F.5.eki..(2^-,,It'.,.."-.:...,:=":-.,..Ft,. it... . • .,,,,,,....,r.: ,.. .•'-',.."...7--41-• .-..'e•-•-:.'.....----'•-•-•‘""-' . /1/_ ...„C-. /I , 1,-,1) if 176 2 d ' <z) 't ' c 14 . , ,. •Iirr::•,----, :: vimpi r eig Nr.- .1, !•- . \\SNII1. 11krt .Ir._r"l• ' ';''.- -t.- \. --s *14.1 ,. . , . _„ , ... ... . , ... - -. . • . ... . - . • - t..':. .4 -' '- '. - . .,. .. ,...--. .... r. .,, .--- . -•, - - . ... . — , -..-- -1.- - ' _. . '1. t.... .•....','''7.,..4' . . ' k / . ".,__.,79',.',:.-.".4!r•••!, ., 1 , ., . • , . t 1- ; atom pl......... •••••11 . .. ... . . - • ., .., . _ - I . .4000051 ..,,,--_---,:_. ,I- • -,..;., , • .. . . ...- . , _ ' - — -.40 . 2 ---'••7 - _ . _. _ . _ • ...414110.-* - ., - • . - • ---. . - .. , . , , . . • :4•'''''.--_,-'-: ---;_ - '-.--.-';'..-.4.-'.•,-..'•-.''..-.3, -..-;• '• •••. •.•-..,' -._._ - . .., , •.... . .• -- •-_., ._.. . ._ . • . • ,..,.., _, . ,,-.. -. „ . .•'.1`,',,,'':-.....• -':' 5.i.'.4-,',1,--,,:-.- 7- ;S:,''...:._•_.: ::-.---• •-.; '::r :... . -:-.•,;•., . . . .--!'..,. ..-- -.--!::.-',::- ..,•"--..•-." ,.. --•:-.--•'''i- ' •--• -- 1--- - .---:.- ;;: :, ,',.;'.•:f;-•t,•,'---.•;..;,-'-'s: .1.,,,-. -.. '--,....-.:-.,•. .. - ' ..... . .. ._ •.--..'-j-1_'..-. '-'•:-,.:•••••,...7..'.::-_ '.•-•,-;; ;-1,3T.,,- ..--; '...."•.- •,-;::,-•:•:,- • ,: - -. I, . JOHN R. LITTON PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR . 118 N.E. 16TH COURT (407)276-7575 DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 . y f E c E C 7---- J"E s So.1 �_^ WOO STOR• ov�.2NUno 9.' • SHEO• i• :-...rm. _±...... t7• FLaC. o N.o -co-oO E. ; : C tP.a. FtCAN �-R• P I.R /7.v w..c.v. 1 10(M) r I °/S on- x.•' f t.91• rpo Po JS s... •�� C t(- t 1 STY. z `) FRAME ,. ._,• RestoeNcE z • =. I / F.F.EL 21.L5 2 X W a i . i v �.�' ix0 w f Al It,. • • n. ., s .c.% t O • 0 0 .0.. trite 1— LP O . O: . r) z ' FNP.P.K. 5l71.R. ) FNO.I.R. HA.L 4-CAP tCAP S.Oo-oO-OU �� 127.9E(M) 60.00'(M)�CR) )� AW /00.04-(M) p.No1 I GCUNC.s I.R.r- 1 cm* 52ASA4ALTIC • 'j E pAymr. 2`_ 2�. `C SWINTON AVENUE- SCALE z I"=Co' SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEET LEGEND' • BENCHMARK REFERENCE' 00 MANHOLE(M.N.) t7 FIRE HYDRANT(F.H.) . T ® " —D33" AN 'X' CUT IN CONC. pT CATCH BASIN (C.B.) 0 WATER METER(W.M.) I (-ANCHOR a GUY . CABLET.V.(CA. V.) S/WINTERSECTION OF AT THE OINOFN. O IRON ROD 6 CAP(I.R.9C) ■ TELEPHONE(TELE.) ELEVATION N.E.ATDHE R 2AND1 E. .p-WOOD POWER POLE(WD.P.P.) 4 CONCRETE POWER PCLE(CONC.F.PI • PERMANENT CONTROL FEINT(I.C.P.) 0 PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT(P.R.M.) ELEVATIONS BASED ON N.G.V.D.AND SHOWN THUS REVISIONS _ DATE BY CK'D FLOOD ELEVATION INFORMATION COMMUNITY No. 125/0Z DATE OF FIRM t 15187 _,-,• _ BASE FLOOD ELEV. - FIRM ZONE "x1 _-, .--..,...,........ .. -- _-, LOW€§T FLOOR€LEY:TI.65 PANEL Nei . ,_, AV b. 'site bnAbt ' bUrrlr ..0- , JOB NQ. 92• () 1DATE' (DRAWN BY' 1CHECKEO PtIF,B./PG. RILRNO. it'ed'1 t/9/42 4i- Dt- 1 gr•/al/ ti.Cl • F B E. L --6.11,"LE 'I- 10C N :'; �_. : . E'•.UE • DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 • 407/243-7000 February 10, 1992 Mr. Dean Hoffman 310 N. Swinton Avenue Delray Beach, FL 33444 Regarding: 310 N. Swinton Avenue. Chain link fence and gates installed without a building permit or Certificate of Appropriateness . Dear Mr. Hoffman. Your property is located in the Old School Square he Historic District. Pursuant to Section 2 .4 . 6 (J) ( 1) ( ) of nd Development Regulations any modification to the exterior of a building within an historic district, including fencing, must be approved by the City' s Historic Preservation Board or its administrative staff through the Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) process . The building permit application for your chain link fence has come to me for COA staff approval . Chain link fences and gates in front yards, or visible from the street, are inappropriate in historic districts and therefore cannot be approved administratively. It will be necessary for you, or your authorized agent, to come before the Historic Preservation Board for approval to allow this fence to remain. I am enclosing a COA application for you to complete please include the items I have checked on page 5 . If you plan to appoint an agent to represent you you will find that form on page 8. The next meeting of the Historic Preservation Board is Wednesday, March 4 , 1992 at 6 : 00 PM in the First Floor Conference Room at City Hall . The completed application must be returned to me by February 21, 1992 . If you have any questions please phone me at 243-7284 . Sincerely, Patricia Cayce Historic Preservation Planner T -- F �V� , March 10, 1992 COA 8-166C Renaissance Dental Studio 503 N.E. 2nd Avenue On March 6, 1992 Mr. Kunze's architect came to the building department for a permit to enclose the garage door. He informed me that Mr. Kunze wanted to alter the approved design for the west facade. The requested change is to omit enclosing the breezeway and install a decorative gate in the opening. It is my opinion that an attractive metal gate in a style complimentary to Deco or Art Moderne would be a more interesting treatment. It would maintain the residential character of the building and allow the original breezeway to remain while still giving a measure of security. I have not seen the applicant's final sketch or photos for the gates so I can't comment on the design. However, even if the design met the criteria presented in the Guidelines this can't be administratively approved because it is a change in a COA previously approved by the HPB. The attached appropriate designs could easily be adapted to gates . Pat Cayce 1/ 1 • (t r" l• ,„\ \ � • 7 k . ENTRANCES Each architectural style has an ensemble of appropriate doo types. Shapes and sizes have been synthesized, and a propert owner should consider its relation to the entire facade. Th architectural importance is integral in dimension, proportion •411 .gt iLAt i rw - 0:: , . .....e.--....4&,._.. , Aftt. � .., :',. .x. : . . . ... . y NYI� .1144. Cu- . • . i r), .r13 ,` , -,, .ft yy • T 4: i , . 4 • 4„ , tXk P' 0 :1=1 if' - s• tkv WWI, 4,,, t,1 • • ' ENTRANCES .:.1.•;_ ro riate door �`' '"j _ • Each architectural style has an ensemble of app p , �" �� izes have been synthesized,and a property 1 �, ��,? _ types. Shapes ands — w owner • should consider its relation to the entire facade. T e ..r`. architectural importance is integral in dimension,proportion, e.. t and directional emphasis. Retaining the original is the key in y , ,i y I'' '_ r, z '��k, maintaining the symmetry and balance of the overall design. , 4,r•• � M? , � ' -' i� Vt sidelights,transoms,and ' , ,M„ " �,,', ," ,� \1 1...1 ',i Columns,posts,entablatures,hoods, provide vital • ' (' ` '/' ,iErU�,;;_ . pediments make the entry door seem larger,andro ;, 3, ��` scale. ►�,,r..r.,, ...•4. .• ;�,,,.+.ri -,104111111 r: Original entrance)clh%play prick in place. , P.'41153VI: -4.•'' %.410.`as-.1 ,W;-.. - • ". lai.,%1"-V. .4.- 434...--. via,%4::111-:. i 1, `'• . .4. 1.ifie.,?r•tV.L5-1.1 ... .t.... 4s,,.NOli A4r ‘t -.• da,117•11.-.. .,. ...,..irt",at•• ii i,N..! t -•'•;11•C'.P".i.:,.1, •Net•4;•qt:- , - ... A....... • 1 • . ...r.va,,..aAi ,..A,.2 4 -4,-;;;;,......- ,,.. .4.-, . • . rb _ . 7".••••• '1•7 r..-•., S.*--skr(a. ''' ' ,pt:-. • ' . 0...,.5 . 4.•.i'.4"' • ••,40., .,,.0,4•1-j,`, :fr.-'1111Z.:.)V-4,• ' ,-, 1•41•,. ....I.7 ik• . •• 4::./..,41,41.-4:.:, .... If-,-.=.7-,-..., . -.1.-1., ...f.,,,r.' •Art.'. V.,,,Cr' '-* .0:.....e. ..t-,,t. **. ,....• -i....,.+1,-..... • ,,..s,,,,,ti ' ...::.•,,....;:...% ..1.01...1 , ., ';'1/44%. ',.'..i. , e _ a ' 4.,-..i.a 4 , _A Pt.:1r,,...„,•:,.r.i.;)„.......r;•,,,,,,,..v,...-01.1, ,e.,',a....-,---"b:-F.4..alkillik". ••..411pc:ib:;:lk.",,,-,-;:f.....'..ir...1.4 4.4 10....,,,!. ...r. r: •4 ..1,,,•g:b -'"..”‘ .......'6"••••1;ist••i",+P.R ._e,...,1 ...•.7 C.,,,,,iv.,... '',..'-'1-P..%,',„,3_NI A,.7_r:11-;.i.'T.,1-*la..., ' a '14,0..•':‘..• :•-:=:--'?.••.s- -• IF-1•:"-114"•,,,:. - . - .1!--;f:X.)i-lir-,401.%1•4''-:::'!:';:,:-- 1.;',-5.-.7,•_:- .1":4Ti.4:;:f"''.' ..;;;.-1 ei"':::, :.,-;*;:;:-.7i-77.-;,77.7". -411.-,-.,-.5.),_ ' . :,.--T'f.,„;,:'-',:-::.t7z.),,..:;..?•..:%..;.r.... .. -4,::„..dip:I.,.0.0.ii.-1!!), .'1.:4,:'A,.:17,-,;-2.5-:.,,,,,;,,,-. .;:,,,;! :„..., _,-,-.,;.-:„.;?;.4--4-.,-..-:;-_,:t-,:.z.-;_k‘„, .•:14.--,-:--,„-:"...1`'-„:. *.i,"•::I..-.:;7;.:,;:ki•gX, ks't.. 'f'4'".,..4%;41..1",,,,,,,?::.`",..4 --7...:.-. .: _.k.-.....-::?:!;.7--;-0.--t ,-....‘..e....?; .-,....•-ct.,-."...,,A114.P .:-.."'-r..--:-'''-';',.. :,--- -. ... '.401-''..s -4) •••i'1.- ' I:-4••:'X' It A-- . ,;-71_.,„.7,-%*-:,&,'.;,4.-,i..,t4r7-:•-:,-,:;--,,,,,,--:,.-,i-,'',. 'Y„r\-1';\ "7,1‘:k.- -..:11:,:v11.,-=:";..fit-rri:-••, -; 0 ; - ' *.•--. 4•"‘"1.,".. .'" .V.:9 .. • se; xi'.--'4---',..".*,-;.:',..4•-v.: •,'"*.4,-,-,•y„.4,,S,...-.---- 42:"-k .;:. --....74v'l- -,a-•,,r7%, „..-.....4,,;•-,,:,-1,7;71; . . %;.:.. •••• %A. . -.41 b. a.!.,fi e_. .•• . 7; , - 4.4 -!..,,,::,--f;„-i',;...-‘,4,,_-. r•:-..,..;•. ....1,----,- --.4.;--....,,- ----,..--;-„,..,',., i.-,":.-7--------,---.;-:,-7. • ..; -'it--- •- : 4.`""%-• '•..11:-Ale'.4•27.,-,:I S.1:.t 7 Air -1,:i..,-4,:;`,",-'--T,%no'.4.7.44.-----..... 44-4,::: --,':-,':-,-.„•,.:-g• ...„.! 4,":;.-.. .. .. 1-;,-.,•-••"."--;-is 4.:,ii,::•.:4•:. ,• ....„-.7.,:0..7„-,c- •,-. de ..„....?::%1/4.,1 .4.14. ;-.47,..k.pr.,it. 4' ...1„'.347)4t-Z....-1•,;-7....?";:f.-.1!",•-`.-,.;-..-:;:-.*. r;%;-:'.4''''-4,'•,',;'71 S.. ....1 All;• ,tl.f.'*:.:-',..--is : -;:--,,;-4. „i- .:::;:‘,...I 1-37_,..;•47:c4...ii:, .-_ - 1„,i,..4„.,..,,,.:k•i:'di '-...•' -.ri..s...!:tc,;7 - 7. 0--1-----Ak •-,, .. .....• 2.'0'....-c,a-=",-...-";\Jr•I. • •, ••••rii:,:fer-c„;* 'et.' ".:--c..•"'..9•Kr"..•.+,.. •;;,,..'i:,.• - ". .....'‘ -1'%V','2. • " t /V 7,;:-.J.jw;i ''.•...'Or';., '-• w`' ..,,* ,-.- :-, : •- ••-•4:... .i0 I. • r• ;%,-,1,,,_-,1,-.zo,,i,,,.`;„-,..r.;.-,,..•-;• .%-1 - ..=-`-',1.--_,--,..1.1 .1,01. sr is.,- a r•s.,-.v.;.•-. .:;,..; ‘. - ^ ,,--..„7,,,-.-a 0 . - • • .. '.',' -.;,•• ..f•-s'*„.•,:‘ I.' ..'-.,.-'- ... - :,'.-1.,.......---„ig, .. 01.g.• d II:!..• . b ..,-AIP. .I. .-...r./.. • -.-....:"0'4,-,....,11.=-.:-'. :.:'. ',..,:.„ .-• .''.',--,,,e_::',:•• -•.. - --'•••-• . .‹,:' .' , "4' " . '. s' '•• •-.' ' -. -,,f 1.7;,,..1,"47:1Z;iev,f.i.".;:,'••••••!--17;'>•-, ,,--.*:'...- -?;..-11' .:...':' %•,-.., ..•! 46 ...f ..4'. .e10‘'''-'' "'• : ' %.9... ----,:".•011-*:.1,!i'l;''''''''-.."%;',:-.-.-...f.:::.2 • ..s.... _••.:1:' p!, . -.....----4-41,*1, . .„0,... . . ' 6 ; - . ''''' filliN*4•11r.t:,-.-' '-,-k•' • .‘• ..." ''':" ..-'.'" . 7., z.-.1..11,4* k..,......1 . 1- %is.' •A „.!..--.!.. ''''. --"'• - .s 7• "... ,,, .-..1.•.. ' :. ..,,,..:Yll. z ... .'4? '',....7r 1 Ire 41P1... ,...' it •." .%I:.• • .;%1i:.--- _,.::1-- .!.-:.,,,,,...&...t-- -,.. ,. . . . .: . f-'-- -4. •• • .'•' 4 -1- .•,. .. ""...Li-.‘. :,-11..:•A,Aw .„ :. s • ',.•- ..-•• .•.• -:-.:1-45 _ ,. , . t,' -", 11- .. 4 ••+" ''''• . -..., ' :• . %: ,.. .• .t. -'' . .' .i, . - • : & ' -it' - := ,-,. !•••• . , - , 1 .. _,_ 1 - ''''•, %-"- ,-; '" 4. 4-----. . , :„... -------4, ,. - • , T.:- •. • -,- ... ...r.li.; f:. 7 ,--':,- *,',--,...e.,r •%,.. ..I.. •. 0 AA .;,. Ir..L..a ft*. ... •" I . .. i,... ,.....,. ,1.-P: V ll .s.'.;"-.2.:' ,...`- ...`-....,:.,:."-;`.k." ,''- .-.'•.' % S- ., ...." i ' .••- '''' *-' • p•-• i(MOT 1*:).•: ita-',-•• --• ' ,..f b ''- .,.."'"'--"' '-.-s"" ^.-.''' • ... -'• ••••P .1-. • -A- :A ' 6•....4:'.' .....;'.'..,'''.." '*-,..t.„... .....--::....•41.,:?..7.7'.,'",„..:::-•'..'.' .,..• ..V11.••,, ......-,-.,, . . ate 4,..-.'::'•.i•Np'-*--;,:.i ”-,--,.'.'. ,I••-,%--1.•-.. i . ......., I - -..:•• •%-,.•=-'- *1”. --..1.,--:`•'`.-•-,': ....-,.-' ":.:.--'"•--&:"-","7, -' ''. ,,•, •'.-.2"*"- '..*. I.- . - , . ..x. • '4•C '1•7‘1,..‘.1"..:4- -:; :.4 '7.V.-,it't'''''4;."-"•;f",;('1%-'i,:''.•'...'; ',''-'.. • . .' . . g,..r...i... •-. - 9.4-t. ., .,t1tztt,--t•-;.:•;',-,-;-,----..-it. Net, ::.,*4,--`,-f-...---:-/- .. ,*‘. , ::\ --:, -• • .-. . k• . .7..../..;..: .,..-'. '" " , ' ' ' ., " ' -,_.-•"/ .... ; ie.' •- -1.- • J..; ,z.. ' .,;‘-\,,,:.1..:-,--;,.-__;: ..--f.,:-.!--',.., 1.44- 72,-..11';'' '. ...--r!'..X:--^ : ii, -''' ::....4-;...--- -.---,-.f-3- -•--.- -,,--f,--.--...-,-T.- ......:-.....- -....--- -- . ''!"-••• 1, -?•' - -4 r -•' - -7 -...4,.... .4...4,44: •••••• .s.%7::P....4 -,.*•• t, ....0.......... . - - :-‘7,;;••••:4,•?• . r- .06-,, c - , ...., b - e . .. a li ' i • • ;. .N•-, 1 • • 4 a • • •-•••, . . e.•?' '• -. ..., . • ' ,••• • .•I .•-;:\ K.,•., •s"•••.-:.`k i , - •......,. .... .,„:11 .. ... 1- vw,.... 4.. .... ... ,...,...e.......,,. . . ;•i ri9,. - _....- ;NT! *7 ;••, - -,•: 1' :; •-• -• :1-..'-:.•,r..i.... .444.• '4 1- •;-"" Lli....t`• ;AZ -.•-• •'• •-•'• - '!-•'•‘..`:-.'- '..:;:> '• •- , (''`.•rlr---.`-'1 • ' '- -.:: .- tt::- • - -.- •••"..r.4.."._ ,.i••:•'.'".-"• _. -t -. ••r"`'S'e, ....A.-... ,.:._.„:. ..,-V.;;::•,•-•;;,;;•••.... ...,4:•3;;;....1-,--... •-•-• Fences need not be just for security. This Art Deco K all and uon gill insert gite pleasure to the resident and passerby. 52 . .... . . -st-,s,''-':;-,- --',•,:in...-Tex---:•:-...•:- -- -:,-,,i.:,-,--,..• '-• _ • . .. ------ • . .- . . . -- _ . .• .t;- - . •- . - ,..„ ' • ,, . _ . - - . - - ---- . .. . ......-.. •=iipsinc=z.-- _. ,, •---4.-- ----,•-•-:-,..;•:. " •-4 % ie-.•:,---4.1.M.:,,.--1-1",---...,:.4- Z...:-...,.. - ---,..-,„,•;,%%%.“--,..--,-4:- .,.":.••el. -.....,,,2-..!•••• • -•.•---- ,--'.::-171:-':71:VilA--4.`"--i.-:'-,-.?-;:;.:::,.:.‘4';-:- • • '•%-'"°!:""!;".2•1--:-2:::•-•.;.-2-1:'-- - • - , . . 'el ii.• -:..."A.j.v.;.--.v1.. -. ;---:: A , \ :: %,- 27 fl _ • • -Pbt: - ---_-:-........-.--,.:i„--..,,,--- . . = . . , ..a.v" . • • • • ... - - ' Nit -' - ' - - #.111r . •-,,.- . ., • ., . -' •. ''- . :., . ,. %••••.•- . ; ••.,,-..: ' . . -- _•.-__'•••.,:-... ;;;___',-.?v.;74;".C.--:-'1-- ----.-. 11 --•\:.. - . -.I' ' - -- '- ' •.:"`•" -,•-•--;'.--.7,•'!- '.-' '. -..- :--;- ..---1..-• -.•.:.•- - „. . - .•'•'2"•'- :`. - - i'.-1 • , .i's. •-- --% • ; ....:..;-'-:•••-::_,..e."-„,-<"- ---N-:.- ''..f.'-' s.:. , - . i /-----7-- , 14, -. rte. --..-• --- - .•-- .? •--* • - -*-----'-"- I . . I ..,-. ,... ..... . - -gightful feature of this Miami Beach Streamline M oe:irondeotpal.rtment building is its screen door. It blends well with the horizontal linesot the -- nor and€5ebrow shading devices over the doors and t . IIt • • . . \. 1 . i • • • • •,e'.-'1, I ft. . •-: --••$'',' 'ti th vi- , ......P". . t'AV .1X1'-' • "-' rif-i i‘l.i ir : 41- •' - , K 2t. - ' 4:i'''' •-•" 1 ...4...... . . -41 ' .-. `• •.).r.... -.••-`okr,.....',," ..-1•;1:,', .t,--Z1i‹'..2.1 -1'1•1,,-''..t•-1,•.:•-c-. .. - -"‘ .-- • A•-T:.";‘i r V-'•; . fj - "°'. ' k% . 1 si - ---, 4 ;'')''-......,.-ICN . • i „ ,.-- . .. e „ ' • .f.r.- ' • • , . ....„..,r_ .,,.. 7 I•• 1 - ..... • I .• • :,,. .-ck•••,), - ..= i -,_.,:". .4.t.•: - ( ill \/ • . / ‘i- 16 ! • a lb l_ . •: 0.C.,V.•.‘- ' 4 • _60 ,• e' IV :: ,tVy P elb-• ... , • --.—.—..... 1 ,11$04 ••••• -4 - • ' I • - , . , , • , • '. 4:" .•., • r •L • :1 :: -. s : • J . 1 I ....: - I 1''. • • -l' l' '- •• ,.,' , i:I •- I ,A • '• • ;1';' . :, 1,•. • .• •..... t - 1 4 i t• Ilk4 * • Vs ek : • Ita • . . 4 • . cl. . •t ,..,•,;„ . . , • • It` -Nlie f•-x- e - X. ...-• . ore. v- , . , .... • . • q•A • P 440. P. r .,.. , ' 4 • ,,, , ..• •••• ".‘i- 'al . - -•- .. - ., : • • .'. , . _--- ..... 2 -, • . - - - co ;711 :El • .. . _ .a. • .t • 7 Z2 . - :"- r--CA • . C ' r, • . CL44:4 04LkX..-C.•• - - • • • - . • . . . • •.- . .- . . . . . - X/904bu5.0 / ir. .5./92. ' • . . . . • ... • • . •. . • ... • .• . . • . . . - - . •"PieSif at--, . . . . • •. - . . P e e. ... . . - . ee A6 • . . . • . _ 0 . . • . -• • C/74,11A)a-L,-- - • - --, - • -. . • . • • • • . . . . . . • . . • • - • . - .. . . . .. . . ... . • , • • . • % % • .. . • . . • •• • 1 . • .. • • • • . . . • • ---‘,..fs . I . . • • • . • • • • • • - . • , . . ( i . • ( • • • ' . • • • . • . . . . . . . • • • - . . .- • • . .. . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . • : • . • • . • . . . . . . _ . . . ............__-_....--..-- • — --. • -• - ' •----• - "--•,' ..:...:...---:-....:.---;--............-.--...— . . ' • ...4,•f:1,q3.... ' ff •'.: . .• ...'.. • 't..1. • .. r'g • 4`. i• . ...;:7_•. 4 r.54.4.:".;.:7_,, on --.`;•:•.--; • - a Ig . •••••o..1- -- .e•:.•• .. •. ) • • k• -, tett• • . . - • ... . . • \ • • * -s t:0- i eir• . • ,. "P'ff.L .k•••cf,71,•::.'a•••$ .,i1.7f I iZ'...‘c--''''.r44.•:•. ..,s' i "•:).i. ..-aT1 • .r;. • J-. •••• - ' .- .• iv-;,...:-••••••.1-.--......-•i`.•••., .. . • I.:7. ••.--,. . • . - . ,"..,W. .f,.1, - ' A • I,e, • •-- .• . ye r....9(I i• raAa.,.; ,,4 • • • . . .,,...........• •--6-;"'.-1.1\v"-* '• • 1 •- --11.1 . .• •.,...0. ,•L: , „ •- • : • - .-• . - / rkJef".' " • _ -„. -%. i \ ,1 ' . e • ; . :-..ec.• 1 .,. --' X I 7 .- .1 : ' I.\--;:'; ,.:- ." ....,- -!-.° ._.%- ';10•-• _,...• I - - .,,,,•, . . ..- _ __ .., - % ' A.- 1 - % i • e ...... ..A„1:-• ..., IS•` .• ..,,„ry . ... •.. ...x. -......., . / , ..\.Y.. JP . P -4110•. • t ..„, e_ • e . . t':-11-'-: ": . .a .....,..„, riss .1 . • a ?7•1!'t-!...1 I 1 ipi a- .`12••-•,. .4: l , ' i.til'-"-•ir 5..I ''.:174.•.I , . . •,‘...',IV 1 ..,11!..1 ...e.!..if • . 1 '-,.,1.i ‘ ••' rg 1•1 a :.•• •.......0 .. . • i - ' • - • *4 iga . • .t_, t '• • , • . .... . 4,..... ..:Est .....ti_. g... ‘1.1. "F • • L. ---, ,. .. :. • 4 i? '''''ti . • • . ;(4, IT -4,- ilk•:-:, :A1110--AiIi..3.1k. . ii& - -' •:".• ::' . et,. ... .:. . ••• . k‘:/.abi;.4151.t4;;e714..MaNlik .. % . - . .. . . .. . • • . .• ... : .0 -, .. -"• `v•.; 7 • ' • • I •.....- ••` .-•• ' -•••'1 "`•..*•••-AC4.V.W.A.!7.V.C.:7-41T-4 ..... • co n% ztt • • 3. •• '... - . - I.".C* • . . ..t• . I cc.s41 iti • • . . )2Nenctk4144- taA-k.c.P.------VeractL _ T.L.Lat..c . . • . . . • •. - . .. .. .. . . • -. : .- - - - - . *- . •. . .• • _ _. . . -• -. ••• :.-. . - - . • . . •. . .. • . .. . . • " . . .. . . .. .. • • • • "• - • • . .. . . • . • . • . - •. . • . - • • . •1 . . • • • • • • . . •-. . - • . .. . . • . . . • • . . . • • • • • . •. • . . . . .