The URL can be used to link to this page

HPB-12-18-13 AGENDA 0 = HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD ��44 Y v.*. Meeting Date: December 18, 2013 Time: 6:00 P.M. Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: City Hall First Floor Conference Room The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service,program,or activity conducted by the City. Please contact the City Manager at 243-7010 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request.Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers.If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing,such persons will need a record of these proceedings,and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made.Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.The City does not provide or prepare such record.Two or more City Commissioners may be in attendance. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA IV. ACTION ITEMS A. Certificate of Appropriateness (2014-046) 125 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District Applicant! Property Owner: Harold and Dawn Jonas Consideration of window replacement on a contributing structure. B. Certificate of Appropriateness and Variance Request(2014-021) 916-918 NE 5th Street, "The Water House", Individually Designated Authorized Agent: Troy Ammons, Architect Applicant/Property Owner: Jennifer Turner Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for additions and alterations to the structures located on an Individually Designated property; Variance request to reduce the side interior (south) setback from 10' to 1'. C. Certificate of Appropriateness (2014-037) 130 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District Authorized Agent: Perez Design, LLC; Francisco Perez-Azua,Architect Property Owner: Charles W. and Carolyn Schroth Consideration of a COA for the demolition of a contributing principal and accessory structure; new construction of a two-story, single-family residence; waiver request to reduce the sight visibility triangle at the rear of the property from 10'x10' to 4'x10'. V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS ❖ Public Comments ❖ Board Members ❖ Staff VII. ADJOURN A wvy E. Alivc rer Amy E. Alvarez Historic Preservation Planner Posted on: December 11, 2013 DELROAY BEACH R � A All-America City I 1 2001 SIGN IN SHEET Historic Preservation Board December 18, 2013 PRINT ADDRESS OR ORGANIZATION ITEM NO. FULL NAME bz.R4), U"oNFs 131 LW, 7ffi 14v� TVt? tkimfrIA c_tsco( Qcez - Azc.rA z��kI, CSC IY. C \Ge i 318 S `Pi\ A u C GJr c ��, ,� ccourrr4 311 cc- 7 3 41/e, G,i, S„) IA) / yam �' III IV.A IV.A IV.B IV.B IV.0 IV.0 HPB MEETING HELD: ATTEND Approval of 125 Dixie 125 Dixie 916-918 916-918 130 SE 7t" 130 SE 7th December 18, Agenda Blvd Blvd. NE 5TH NE 5t" Avenue Avenue 2013 Street Street COA COA COA Variance COA Waiver VOTE to VOTE to VOTE to VOTE to VOTE to VOTE to VOTE to NAME Approve Approve Approve Approve Approve Approve Approve (1 Vote) (2 Vote) 3-3 5-0 3-3 Tabled to Jan. 13,2014 6-0 6-0 6-0 6-0 Ronald Brito P Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Iris McDonald P A Y Y Y Y Y Y (610P) John Miller A A A A A A A A Ana Maria P Y N N Y Y Y Y Aponte Samuel Spear P Y N N Y Y Y Y Annette Smith P Y N N Y Y Y Y Annie Adkins P Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Roof Adjourned: 8:47P HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT Property Owner: Harold and Dawn Jonas Property Address: 125 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District HPB Meeting Date: December 18, 2013 File No: 2014-046-COA ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for exterior alterations on a contributing structure located at 125 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H). BACKGROUND/PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject property is located on the north side of Dixie Boulevard, between North Swinton Avenue and NE Second Avenue within the Del-Ida Park Historic District. A circa 1928 Mediterranean Revival style single-family residence is located on the property, and is classified as contributing to the historic district. In 2003, administrative approval was granted for a new driveway apron material at the subject property, and in 2004, a COA was approved by the Board the relocation of a gazebo from 211 NW 1st Avenue to the subject property. No other COAs are on file for 125 Dixie Boulevard. The property owner is now requesting approval for alterations to the contributing structure with the replacement of the original wood, upper-story arched, single hung, 4/1 windows. The proposed windows will be made of aluminum and will be impact-rated, so no additional hurricane shutters will be necessary. However, the new windows will consist of a rectangular, 4/1 single-hung window, with a separate, 4-light arched window mulled above. There are two windows on the first floor which contain this configuration. However, there are no records indicating they were approved by the HPB, and building permit records do not indicate that a permit was issued for their installation. Therefore, it is understood that no previous Board or Historic Preservation Planner signed off on their installation, thereby setting a "precedent" for the subject proposal. The COA for window replacement is now before the Board for consideration. ANALYSIS Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H)(5), Prior to approval, a finding must be made that any Certificate of Appropriateness which is to be approved is consistent with Historic Preservation purposes pursuant to Objective A-4 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and specifically with provisions of Section 4.5.1, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. 125 Dixie Boulevard, 2014-046-COA HPB Meeting of December 18,2013 Page 2 of 3 Historic Preservation Districts and Sites Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E) Development Standards, all development regardless of use within individually designated historic properties and/or properties located within historic districts, whether contributing or noncontributing, residential or nonresidential, shall comply with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, these regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. (E)(2)(b)3., Major and Minor Development: The subject application is considered "Major Development", as it is "the construction, reconstruction, or alteration of any part of the front façade of an existing contributing residential or non-residential structure and all appurtenances,..." STAFF COMMENT: The proposed window alteration classifies the subject request as "Major Development" and is reviewed as such throughout the report. (E)(4) Alterations In considering proposals for alterations to the exterior of historic buildings and structures and in applying development and preservation standards, the documented, original design of the building may be considered, among other factors. (E)(5) Standards and Guidelines A historic site, building, structure, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall only be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, as amended from time to time. Those applicable Standards and Guidelines are noted below: The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. (Standard#2) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. (Standard#9) Window Guidelines o Changing the historic appearance through inappropriate design materials is not recommended. (E)(8) Visual Compatibility Standards. New construction within a designated historic district or on an individually designated property shall be visually compatible. In addition to the Zoning District Regulations, the Historic Preservation Board shall apply the visual compatibility standards provided for in this Section. Visual compatibility for major development shall be determined by utilizing criteria below: (m) Additions to Individually Designated Properties and Contributing Structures in all Historic Districts Visual compatibility shall be accomplished as follows: 3. Characteristic features of the original building shall not be destroyed or obscured. 1225 Dixie Boulevard, 2014-046-COA HPB Meeting of December 18, 2013 Page 3 of 3 STAFF COMMENT: The proposed window alteration to switch from a arched, single-hung window comprised of two-pieces to one of three pieces is understandable in that this is the only option for a lower-priced replacement intending to match the historic aesthetic. An upper portion made up of just one piece is only available in wood or aluminum-clad wood, which is more expensive. However, the proposed change does not meet the intent of the regulations noted above in that the proposed windows will alter the character of the structure and eliminate an original feature and detail. Therefore, positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(5) and (E)(8) cannot be made. Further, the alteration does not meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, who also recommends that historic windows be repaired, rather than replaced. Staff's recommendation is at the Board's discretion. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness (2014-046) for the property located at 125 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. C. Move denial of the Certificate of Appropriateness (2014-046) for the property located at 125 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. (Motion to be phrased in the affirmative. See above) RECOMMENDATION At the Board's discretion. Report Prepared by: Amy E. Alvarez M _, f .. -riit l),/‘` .- - ' i ��j,‘,A.' .fit ,4e - , ii ,. m A c t ,Ns• yx,r Y � , „, • r 'N . ti ' Lr4 «u r (t 4 /k! d v X . rag ', ..d., 1 F M',�.`: A4 r '.. r A X 1' '4`;4 ,if Ma�*i'fA' P YR i r # S mot$'Eix e ,.wawo,;f i . ii 1 Ell .; +r t. 't �,p'14 xr� I. 12, y0-z- .+ y �v� r J wq !+:- t'�> F wc� f,* .7, fir. yt a:A Pi P'`�"i a -ate �, ;•i t d,-,., 'x � '� % hS r ' Ai 1 ,C'M ' -, .wt',' ,~,,Azr, '- � w s f r�.fi p i c-^' — < .t it k k P." r rn1 H g r .,+ l i I r y �% y - .a x r .* ,+ „� JK... " ur 0.,"i,:..W kX r4, r- r 6 rF o s 1,N ,.4 a * „• , a .: ra 1z rP i v ."`gar' ,y �itrf a Opening Drawings for the Base Proposal Q222634 SIW_ SUPPLY ONLY Job ID: SIW- SUPPLY ONLY Jonas, Harold - (561)441-5004 125 North Dixie Blvd. DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444 Drawings for Opening:01-01-01 Opening Type: Block[S] Product Dimensions: 47 x 49 MASONRY OPENING 47 3/4 x 49 3/4 Opening PSF:(+70.0/-70.0 PSF *) 47 47 Drawings for Opening:01-02-01 Opening Type: Block[S] Product Dimensions: 31 x 42 N MASONRY OPENING 31 3/4 x 42 3/4 Opening PSF:(+70.0/-70.0 PSF *) 31 31 Drawings for Opening:01-03-01 Opening Type: Block[S] Product Dimensions: 31 x 42 N MASONRY OPENING 31 3/4 x 42 3/4 Opening PSF:(+70.0/-70.0 PSF *) 31 31 Drawings for Opening:01-04-01 Opening Type: Block[S] 7' Product Dimensions: 38 x 61 ZIT) MASONRY OPENING 38 3/4 x 61 3/4 Opening PSF: 38 { 38 Q222634 1 of 3 Date Printed: 09/17/2013 Opening Drawings for the Base Proposal Q222634 (Continued . . .) SIW_ SUPPLY ONLY Job ID: SIW- SUPPLY ONLY Jonas, Harold - (561)441-5004 125 North Dixie Blvd. DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444 Drawings for Opening:01-05-01 Opening Type: Block[S] Product Dimensions: 31 x 42 1111111 MASONRY OPENING 31 3/4 x 42 3/4 Opening PSF: 31 31 Drawings for Opening:01-06-01 Opening Type: Block[S] (ME, Product Dimensions: 31 x 42 N MASONRY OPENING 31 3/4 x 42 3/4 Opening PSF: 31 31 Drawings for Opening:02-07-01 Opening Type: Block[S] Product Dimensions: 104 x 59 1111 LO MASONRY OPENING 104 3/4 x 59 3/4 Opening PSF: 34 1 34 1 34 104 Drawings for Opening:02-08-01 Opening Type: Block[S] Product Dimensions: 35 x 59 1/2 1111 N MASONRY OPENING 35 3/4 x 60 1/4 Opening PSF: 35 35 Q222634 2 of 3 Date Printed: 09/17/2013 Opening Drawings for the Base Proposal Q222634 (Continued . . .) SIW- SUPPLY ONLY Job ID: SIW- SUPPLY ONLY Jonas, Harold - (561)441-5004 125 North Dixie Blvd. DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444 Drawings for Opening:02-09-01 Opening Type: Block[S] LIEM Product Dimensions: 35 x 59 1/2 1111 N0) MASONRY OPENING 35 3/4 x 60 1/4 Opening PSF: 35 I 35 Drawings for Opening:02-10-01 Opening Type: Block[S] Product Dimensions: 35 x 59 1/2 MASONRY OPENING 35 3/4 x 60 1/4 Lo Opening PSF: 35 f 35 Drawings for Opening:02-11-01 Opening Type: Block[S] zrill Product Dimensions: 30 x 45 11111111 MASONRY OPENING 30 3/4 x 45 3/4 Opening PSF: 30 30 Drawings for Opening:02-12-01 Opening Type: Block[S] Product Dimensions: 30 x 30 0 c) MASONRY OPENING 30 3/4 x 30 3/4 Opening PSF:(+70.0/-70.0 PSF *) 30 30 Q222634 3 of 3 Date Printed: 09/17/2013 • t HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT Property Owner: Jennifer Turner Authorized Agent: Troy Ammons, Architect Project Location: 916-918 NE 5th Street, "The Water House", Individually Designated HPB Meeting Date: December 18, 2013 File: 2014-021 ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is the consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) and Variance request associated with additions and alterations to the property located at 916-918 NE 5th Street, "The Water House", Individually Designated, pursuant to Land Development Regulations (LDR) Section 2.4.6(H). BACKGROUND & PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject property, which consists of the West 84.82 feet of Lot 37 of the Las Palmas Subdivision, is located on the southeast corner of NE 5th Street and Fisher Lane within the R-1-AA (Single-Family Residential) zoning district. In 2001, the City Commission adopted Ordinance 15-01, thereby individually designating the property and listing it on the Local Register of Historic Places. Two cottages exist on the property which were built between May of 1936 and March of 1938. In 2001, a COA for exterior color changes on the structures was submitted and administratively approved as they were very similar to the existing scheme at that time. The property has since been unoccupied for a number of years and the previous owners or interested buyers frequently inquired about demolition. However, the property measures less than 50' wide (49.65') and would not be able to be redeveloped. The current property owner has opted to maintain the structures by rehabilitating and improving them, which should ultimately ensure their maintenance and viability for the future. In August 2012, administrative approval was granted for the change of roof material from asphalt shingle to a standing seam metal roof. In March 2013, a COA (2013-102) was approved by the HPB for improvements to the principal structure and site which included the following: Main Structure • Rebuild brick piers and concrete foundation; • Replace all clapboard as needed with matching profile and dimensions; • Replace existing front door with a two panel, impact rated door. • Add a front entry feature and landing with trellis extending to existing driveway; • Replace existing 6/6 windows flanking entry with 6/1, aluminum clad double hung windows; • Rebuild rear closet addition on south elevation; • Rebuild existing side kitchen on west elevation with new interior space to accommodate both a kitchen and portion of a bathroom, and switch flat roof to a hip roof with matching pitch; • Alter the existing sun room to provide for the conversion to a bedroom, such as: 916-918 NE 5"'Street;COA 2014-021 HP8 Meeting December 18.2013 'Page2cf6 o Remove wood siding and replace with "split face block on existing base wall" on lower portion, with new wood siding to slightly differ from the main portion of house with wider boards, o Replace windows on the north and east elevations consisting of three, four-light casements flanked by shutters; o French doors will provide access to the south side of the property. Other Site Improvements: • Addition of a wood trellis between the two structures. Colors • Body and Trim: Dove White • Front Door and Shutters: Wythe Blue There were no proposed or approved alterations to the guest cottage at that time. The current proposal modifies the approved alterations as follows: • Eliminate front entry feature and trellis and replace with a 1' gable roof extension over new stoop; • Enlarge rear bathroom and closet addition on both the west and south elevations; • Eliminate approved "split face block on existing base wall" on the sunroom and install new clapboard siding to match; • Eliminate window on south elevation; • Add 1/1 single hung window on west elevation; • Add a second window to east elevation. The proposal also requires a variance for encroachment within the required 10' side interior (south) setback. The existing structure is located 1' from the south property line; the closet addition extends along the wall plane and maintains the 1' encroachment for a length of 2'. The bathroom addition is further setback and is located 5'2" from the south property line, but must also obtain relief. The proposal would also eliminate the previously approved standing seam metal roof; a new fiberglass shingle roof will be installed. The subject COA is now before the Board for consideration. SITE PLAN & DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. Zoning and Use Review Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), Development Standards, properties located within the R-1-AA zoning district shall be developed according to the requirements noted in the chart below. As illustrated, the proposal is in compliance with the applicable requirements. 916-918 NE 5tb Street:COA 2014-021 HPB Meeting December 18. 2013 'Page 3 of 6 Requirement Existing/Proposed Lot Coverage (Maximum) _ --- 31.7% Open Space (Minimum, Non-Vehicular) 25% 67% Setbacks: Front (West) 30' 1'6" Side Interior (South) 10' Side Street (North) 15' 19.75' Rear (East) 10' 8'5" *Setback variance required and analyzed in this report. STAFF COMMENT: As illustrated above, the proposal maintains the existing setbacks, which are legal non- conformities, with the subject improvements. However, there is additional encroachment within the side interior setback along the south side of the property, thereby requiring a variance. The variance has been analyzed further in this report. DESIGN ELEMENTS ANALYSIS Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H)(5), Prior to approval, a finding must be made that any Certificate of Appropriateness which is to be approved is consistent with Historic Preservation purposes pursuant to Objective A-4 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and specifically with provisions of Section 4.5.1, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. LDR Section 4.5.1 (E) Development Standards: All development regardless of use within individually designated historic properties and/or properties located within historic districts, whether contributing or noncontributing, residential or nonresidential, shall comply with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, these regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. (E)(2)(c)(5), Major and Minor Development: The subject application is considered "Minor Development", as it is a change to an Individually Designated site. (E)(4) Alterations. In considering proposals for alterations to the exterior of historic buildings and structures and in applying development and preservation standards, the documented, original design of the building may be considered, among other factors. (E)(5) Standards and Guidelines. A historic site, building, structure, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall only be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, as amended from time to time. Those applicable Standards are noted below: The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. (Standard#2) Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings, shall not be undertaken. (Standard#3) 918-918 NE 5' Street:COA 2014-021 HPB Meeting December 18.2013 Page 4 cI 6 New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. (Standard#9) New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. (Standard#10) (E)(8) Visual Compatibility Standards. All improvements to contributing buildings, structures and appurtenances thereto within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. In addition to the Zoning District Regulations, the Historic Preservation Board shall apply the visual compatibility standards provided for in this and other criteria set forth elsewhere in Section 4.5.1. The following criteria apply: (g) Relationship of Materials, Texture, and Color: The relationship of materials, texture, and color of the facade of a building and/or hardscaping shall be visually compatible with the predominant materials used in the historic buildings and structures within the subject historic district. (h) Roof Shapes: The roof shape, including type and slope, of a building or structure shall be visually compatible with the roof shape of existing historic buildings or structures within the subject historic district. The roof shape shall be consistent with the architectural style of the building. (k) Directional Expression of Front Elevation: A building shall be visually compatible with the buildings, structures, and sites within a historic district for all development with regard to its directional character, whether vertical or horizontal. (I) Architectural Style: All major development shall consist of only one (1) architectural style per structure or property and not introduce elements definitive of another style. (m) Additions to. Contributing Structures. Visual compatibility shall be accomplished as follows: 1. Additions shall be located to the rear or least public side of a building and be as inconspicuous as possible. 2. Additions or accessory structures shall not be located in front of the established front wall plane of a historic building. 3. Characteristic features of the original building shall not be destroyed or obscured. 4. Additions shall be designed and constructed so that the basic form and character of the historic building will remain intact if the addition is ever removed. 5. Additions shall not introduce a new architectural style, mimic too closely the style of the existing building nor replicate the original design, but shall be coherent in design with the existing building. 6. Additions shall be secondary and subordinate to the main mass of the historic building and shall not overwhelm the original building. STAFF COMMENT/ANALYSIS: Overall, the intent of the Standards for Rehabilitation, Guidelines, and Visual Compatibility Standards have been met with the proposal. The new windows, while differing from the existing non-original windows, are appropriate to the style and maintain a differentiation between the original structure and its later additions. Based on the comments provided above, positive findings can be made with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8), subject to conditions of approval which address the noted recommendations. 916-913 NE 5` Street:COA 2014-021 HPB Meeting December 18.2013 Page 5 of 6 VARIANCE ANALYSIS Pursuant to LDR Section 2.2.6(D), the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) shall act on all variance requests within an historic district, or on a historic site, which otherwise would be acted upon by the Board of Adjustment. Section 2.4.7(A)(6), Variances: Alternative Findings of the Historic Preservation Board: The Board may be guided by the following to make findings as an alternative to the criteria listed in Section 2.4.7(A)(5): (a) That a variance is necessary to maintain the historic character of property and demonstrating that the granting of the variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare. (b) That special conditions and circumstances exist, because of the historic setting, location, nature, or character of the land, structure, appurtenance, sign, or building involved, which are not applicable to other lands, structures, appurtenances, signs, or buildings in the same zoning district, which have not been designated as historic sites or a historic district nor listed on the Local Register of Historic Places. (c) That literal interpretation of the provisions of existing ordinances would alter the historic character of the historic district, or historic site to such an extent that it would not be feasible to preserve the historic character of the historic district or historic site. (d) That the variance requested will not significantly diminish the historic character of a historic site or of a historic district. (e) That the requested variance is necessary to accommodate an appropriate adaptive reuse of a historic building, structure, or site: Note: As required by the LDRs, a notice regarding the subject variance request was sent to those property owners located within a 500' radius of the subject property. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), the side yard setback for structures in the R-1-AA zoning district is ten feet (10'). STAFF COMMENT: As previously noted, proposed addition will be located 1' from the property line on the south side, as it will follow the existing wall plane for a length of 2'. The addition will then move interior to the property and be setback 5'2" from the south property line. The variance for the additions will assist in adapting the existing property to the new owner's needs while maintaining the character and not compromising the integrity. Special conditions and circumstances exist as the existing structure is non-conforming with respect to setbacks, and the property is of such a small size that any additions proposed would require a variance. Literal interpretation of the regulations would not permit the property owner to add onto the structure anywhere other than the front elevation, which would significantly alter the character and be contrary to the requirements of LDR Section 4.5.1. Based on the above, positive findings can be made to reduce the side interior setback on the south side of the property from ten feet (10') to one foot (1'), in association with the proposed addition. 916-918 NE 5. Street:COA 2014-021 HPB Meeting December 18.2013 'Page 6 or 6 ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness and Variance request (2014-021) for 916- 918 NE 5th Street, "The Water House", Individually Designated by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. C. Move denial of the Certificate of Appropriateness and Variance request (2014-021) for 916-918 NE 5th Street, "The Water House", Individually Designated by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request does not meet the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. (Motion to be phrased in the affirmative. See above) RECOMMENDATION Move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness (2014-021) for 916-918 NE 5th Street, "The Water House", Individually Designated by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the 1/1 single hung window be revised to a 2/2 configuration; 2. That all window muntins be dimensional in profile; 3. That the shutters be consistent and located throughout the project; and, 4. That shutterdogs be added at each shutter. Variance Approve the variance to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), to reduce the side interior (south) setback for the addition to 1', whereas 10' is required, based upon positive findings to LDR Section 2.4.7(A)(6). Report Prepared by:Amy E. Alvarez, Historic Preservation Planner V DIC E II V r-___, n 1`,--)1 11 0 C T 2 013 1( '1I' SITE PLAN NOTES Q 4 Atl ertt v,Lnee ... Rm.INlAO!WA 11 WP o _ .i Au:Rc a [vi LIA34N'e'iu i VON.t Co 0, iK at niv r=,or e'.' 1 L',1. .< PLANNING&ZONING,,. " .a rt..Mo. orArl. ♦.row.Ae400 WrfAOr NAIL ROIAN U�UI3lWor0 Owrb 003,33LIGOZ OM,ta re eou PRORnM LM.OAnI 66hZ oRArr r eEWrb LONet133ClON WALL Dr PROM.Or Mn j Artw A.tION... ta,t r WALLRA,wr R O.irF: R`i,A O. ter AND wOC INRCW'u`lu.p�Rrp or GoNOMICOO,NA, Not �w a��- F I .�°n'nciu Our cumauen OAALL or rvnro.w....,lit IN ♦ e•.a3• ` v.r!' Orr,.P iOR r "or.a.,P.IR ,reOP FrI trIt '!°t+A0.T.At WO DatNO,A,rc j a u wo.x t1 to LONoIRumN uAT Anr RAW VIT Rwtor GVT.nr O AREA OF NEW -'� j RACLLR eNAu oofaN Au rra:eeARr vrrmna rnm run crtr a or�R.ar x 4+3' LAUNDRY ENCROACHMENT mN+ LL �waw rm RLecr wry ru air eta e V. R4croR e«A Rs a e � a arse.trc.,w ate•u'a`+ ARr emc•-v.v.u;,oRvrmra wA,x b Pt.rARO erteALt _ III ---_------- -------------.----- __ .aw i"e ertw C[:Ni wAftR R[t[Ntenl wrtH41,H! b elte WALL AREA OF NEW RRu R`e b o r anr"u.nn' eo o araA"=r rt X.: :e=to atr awes 0' BATHROOM ENGROAGNMENT ('�+al v ~ L.u�rn a -AREA OF;EW I Rou"rPm�fneuLr��ae u+e Vrt.PRox<!cmnArnN t°'"fO'ALL • ��- rrvc ao nuw,w*R wrrtR 4 LANDING/BTAtR ENCROACHMENT `o ' x t.a.wen Wn e ii f n .Nam�a etrt Q H Mr ira AVp Y�eu u�`00uTlrR N d tlj R EXISTING �� Y (I WATERHOUSE tI ABACO QLL 4 i0O1R`i a°Hi`Loon0k. " COTTAGE f �I j NM rallorRVL+n, �j n '� "� NO WORK I O Zp Y I mj W ► O-'K.A. aA "efP't, AI Q v r:Pr rotrewn 1t l r enw } wa t aR R�m.�N r„<R 161100t.1 F 0 - EXISTMG I 1 G Au GFivf e L I 6 i I wg�e PR RR Lt�N r 'I <igrar, i i \ o / T / i ,/ \ / / \ \ .. .. ... ...... i i \\ / \ , r umo p+ ..e vu • 3 N.E. 5T1-1 51. !A"+ tlPLAN ApAGO COO.,arfl.NO WOK hal or oumNc ALARDSGA, .rAMOCO .r• AUA ler Or Moron . a ..-e..b. SCALE! v4I' NO' -j:� , A100 • `Z V ......... .......... ................ .............. .............. .............. .......... .. ... .. ....,.... .. ..... .... .q 300 SERIES KEYNOTES r DOOR AND WINDOW TYPES °n't, °H"aaa LC06 e""'°°rr """"`° PP. i t � !m0 r7"niii i, am ®.'I R.mo \J_ ��.'r Dr.n WPC,wrm _. _r,ARr a iso •_"•yv 111031 ®f®� ®' GM � A '"; o v u�rni. rxrc"na 1 ❑ =;- J — .- ewe crs,n - ccre oe e•.._„r"r '.. �� d�r ti ea rrPT au rnnn MTh war TO.1.10n. rx¢caDo- •4 "e.neNF. EXTERIOR DOOR SCHEDULE VTR @ p Jiff WV..PArroTr. Bre n«,M r 3 E 1 t lei a w! $ 4r On • I rIW o°ma eF.CA WIN DnPO..: ..u.o.°.r'.6 euo wow,..N.w w I _I I ei:new ra eaomwrt feu unH a«�ro•".'g Orl �ewr"" ..Y O.r r v.•ec I 1` I 9 WAY CO isvLr blmr.e6 ..y ane�l3eCwJPPLRIr L.P.MOTO Nr o WINDOW SCHEDULE .r..oN. �' h•1 1, COP PPR.ter PTO IOW m r WINDOW mop 'Arc �y�F WAb+ml �I jE � NLfJ[:OF E40e re rwmu.NCO PAK DOAN A.ww 1.9 MAW 066.05 DOOR a WA 0' e pp F' eau—r Y' 9 Ar ORIWR POA e ee eF eer e947i ;.,�G'.. IP V0Ir o..el+. vp. I OF oc`""c'ecr.ic"rrr w°PVA"I.e"e Rew cc2 or ate ...r at Rewe A6 coon maw wro or.�I: "COI A OINK .n.Nre....M.Croon rt.w we.r Q p We I 53 Fm rows le re oa wee Ao ca..cke..00.4.o..to p.m wopor, wore. roPer wroo two. INTERIOR DOOR SCHEDULE W a " . ..W .....°�, P.e......,...... wow. .9.1NATO.. PLUMBING RISER DIAGRAM Pr DOOR6. re PT, FP .r, Re,AR6.... F° Kr Per MOO ed Q WIZ rr rxr DOOR ra U LT..WVIOTA. Kr Fri MGR 60.1 •re.X V, wwec wD P. • Q Li A101 '..I•xd<• w NA Nor POPO • N= c x 0,, wwe<.o Pro . Z ...r• a., .< 1 Fore r.•xV*. NA NA NA pot eFD gE NA W w�K max' x a e• w Q O NA NA NA nor orro d NA Nor NOW COD 1`t+r'r)M CLOSWXO S 1# A?' /a�ri„rir rc N C.'<x e e NNA VVirn en M Ej '''''''''"''''''''7. I. ��ij 0-. T �l�I,O•• FWN.wJ Arlo P.R. 111 rO_�ra ® o tl�► x oi 1��o F.DP AAA POP. -- Ma BEDROOM �i� �r r n.. e.m ' 0 �I �7 �• 00 iir ;©ye,. • Phror NOTES ii _ PM,.on lro _All-DOOR.Dr.It MD PPM.o CPC.i o rR o IMOR uAccw.TOMS ND P0.65,60vOFNItQ PO.Hu, µL eaa ooOPe ewu-"r eeucrm er rw oau�AND aeu m eOOocorrcIA"er emr me rrP eeA r.nrPnP WOO,WALL ee emAcr PARDLORIDA ROOM Y —� ®WI WALL TYPE DESCRIPTIONSIi .., rxe _ \PUNaxe 0 c.v... . b ....,..; O..,, Deeial wo.'Lg. ©=0CJD ew DAP- 4665 o'Ar o�°_ o 1 0� A � o Pre Kira. D"" PM .•rm.o r 0 PLATO NO CV WO 10P PLAT o " iuPuw xNW POO. .TWO P PLR owina LP.L..O AT All rnrwecc 5016.6 AR N.M. WM VD.COIL.10A.O.rP woe inn POOP53 OF LW.OF.>AD., .I er uP OPe.fgO..An to eu 4 PPoru A"'rl Jr� . �'m�rcman 10(0 m�rnv w.w. V.mroo qiq F...F..o.0 .eore Ar rH.ne.eel AD f 1e F"w' exleTNe ,•x µ �I�-Olio L rower .; e u .., /� PROW.t eRD....'FAA coos.."w°io...0-.r k_ v''I• a> ILL • Nr Ong' tON bIOS,NON 9:.Y'KO k, ••—•Fe. T Catt FIRST FLOOR I PLAN ^ 3 A101 w e wuN�wwaR N 6GALEJ V4••I'•0"Aar,N.I-PALL AND 0.110 ro NO.COL A>,.�a+ue acre:. e.�..a PM COOL. / E a. PPP-Cr.rrzcrr0 or DC Cu. �a N � A ELEVATION NOTES 0-0/AtIO1 MOO r eit,,COLOR11 AND 111100.0 ON LOOK RRgp O A / oO• r a a RDR Rare A.MAID rn/gn/o rK OAST.o•f.wO 1841, a c; LAO VD DAILWR a rto 001.1 0010•OOW,PL. ,/o ruff«[Mona oNeoKeO CORKR AOMP ere POCK A.Of ur eaa ROOM Ore/n Ac SOLICIT,O I • / N Cfrf MD SNOOP POOO COTO[n Pr uY[R Po•,forum reefr RATIO ALAI Cuc•OM CzrtNbR Pan/fOWRe MOT 131171 PORT °DTrcrm PR w TUT o WOO OLLt 7 6rnT[N POP ACK IC WRmue uercO •' OWLS Ao OS COISO 111/110/oe "S o FOROOLA POW.ARCS arncr I VIM,WM =7 M. V7 RSV r ATM R e as MA ' ��/ TO."/Rn W rfi CO o r,�°..NfTn R - - , — 4 u +.g u a � •-0---s---°---= r"_ i'i== ==�.= `- -- I AuraA�T SIN — :era __®�l- Ne ■ei _ 1 -•, enAMT A7 f a,� . — — © _—�, a i-� I in or ro cmacv�+fnv:° O. c'ir>roaa Born �ti�i ,�e+ra DOA.,CO 0/00 HO 0•1•10100•00 . MOMIOSIO. 11 10,101MMI mN °eaa All 7 n ( New rve</RAMP u 1WO.LIR CURSOR. 1 a��l� Q .14:;: .a. _b _�� 1.;. �� ! fnN[NA�R�� r DRAB o "`°ON1SO v err OVA. a ffOW re�/R �WR , Rw�°R � ORE RRRN� ARA e� <yD, SPOOR .AeT.ReNnygTRIAfwAO O NORTH ELEVATION °N`rR,.A a, °,q 0 WEST ELEVATION �R TAA^° o SSCAAL f 1I/A"•I-C ECAL[I i/4 .I•O' F POOR NO.ur NORM SrmAO RATIO AALAKe a Astro...VAPOR TOP WIND PRESSURES 1' epn ,e Per Xf < •✓PT PM Me PCs Yj —� u l` RAN x..�. < I..i..-S_.L.-..--C. -- 4 Y Y p . I Y G 4 I 4 0 I G 4 :`/ Q..;��i�i �'== = i=�, Tom.-�-wxo wN TNn.nv pO tlrig MIN___ _ III®MI_ ; �c°r _ n' in Wail 1=9i! t,or g It� ��— —� __ - fill g • Mnu i !!! 6zgn.q POI w MO MAST OSTID �nwf CIII • ..: ,, .\ w —-07e" 2111MIEBEEZIE MIMI Cray, c 100.10 IOW RR,Re�Dar �aOP OP DO,a0 WALLD,nn°,R AMA jRe T R.� [ HOOT OAP, N.,Afar, WO APPROVAL O EAST ELEVATION O SOUTH ELEVATION LARISILe Or A'T I C R A steer No 1/4.•1-0 WAITIPOJNI OA-aRCSNOM a MOOar rnR NOR e k A201 NX R A • — OAT ,e,.te„ ; 0 t Fl MO,Pock rtU701=ar I--g ......� y �ey \'`:arw uw� W � O '1 .��cy�[.v'r 'YM i �i—i_i___ CCU—��i Ud .u. '■11 ■n `I I 41'per �cr W 0r .wwt.o�I 111 —Uiiifl�'iii r Z= _�0 _0�_ 1 4/4 i tm' F ..ppr wwl V ��. .. i 1/ `� .�r. altm wrrA�.t �.��a.�... Q . J w 0 WEST ELEVATION O WEST ELEVATION Qo6CLr.1/4".1.-C" 66CALi /4",P-o"a onAL.lor.•NO WOW.NiwE 10001010AIGN k t- ef,_ i i _. ,, . , .._,, CJ` r�,q l� .t—i �� - - h{1 Ohm r c A—, I 0 r E--- Tr— _ � _al 7eminimil--=•-•-1-1- m,� �'LGrR wrvWLMCAC.„..=,____,, r - •*=,--- ; ... ,v 111TT17�1771TT ° _LLLI 111�` t III 1 =�� NI. =•111 mon Fm ICI a I� I I I —�� f l I r--i i a'� �� ...4tw rn�o-i r�r.°:axe cottac[rIC igra Arrl.e.0 OSOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION t • 6GALC.r1/4".I'.0" O �co ctri� E lOACOCOr. h Air.e. \ I A202 e \ ,11:1; h .. A . ARC L'Npi' r!f GEORGE si I., Y b 0uSH 81 C.B.S = CONCRETE BLOCK STRUCIVRE 1u'- ..1 .CHORD D'.STANCC 1 d ,: r c4AT '^ENrERAH1EOG E !EGA.DE°r l IDh; r er f 'sR 3 NOr c: CON.... .CONCRETE /' 2 :ne -LEv. ELEOATIOn He I17SF 8+8i FEEL Or inT 37,LAS FALMAS SJ80INSIOM..AC.ORCIV"u.. 4 w r; I 17 is.s -wa, F.O.A EDGE NOF AO HALT r. ;NE PLAT T4EP'0E AS PE.ORJOD IN F,.A-P0IY 10 %ACE EE OF — a T.P. RO o;og 7/ FUSLI 600200S 0c FAtS 6EAGH C WNT`e t0TOA 'ca° a I' t .R. IRON REBAR - ''< N' B B r2 iitt r N/L FAA WTH CISC F r +I -rp `rtA N/T .HAIL WTH TN TAB {9i6 ILE. S,r MEET, DJ PAY EEAOH, E CrRrDAi` r :LI I a', I I s:l PPP N.T.S. NCT'C SCALE P. PERMANENT CONTROL PANT P,D.Ed.B =PONT R BEC.hN.NO VICINITY F.O.0 PUNT OF COMMENCEMENT VPCINI -y. YAP R. .RAD'US. Ii V�i��i 1 i►LCii R,/N- .'RIG.IT-0°-MAY I HEREBy1 CERTFY THAT 1 HAVE CUP.VOTED THE PROPERTY HEREON T'YR, . iw.CAE DESCRISEC AND THAT THIS SKETCH OF SURVEY IS ACCURATE AND C DELTA ANGLE - CORREC-TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. I FARTHER 0/5 - .OFFSET CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY MEETS 0R EXCEEDS THE MINIMUM CM. .CONCRETE MONUMENT TECHNICAL STANDARDS A5 SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 61C17-E O' THE fLORIDA ACMINISTR4ITYE CODE AND THAT THrRE ARE NO ABOVE GROUND ENCROACHMENTS OTHER THAT;Thos6 SHOWN. — ——-r r=s r,N. — — — S.E. 6t.h STREET —— —— / twsot Ltd-- / �i rl :ERnFr to. N �d. , J J / i m heat JE4.IFEF, TU666ER FT'.;/4',n FcFCE 1 I W1t4 �` •\ s�a2 y J ,I J. , ' 1- I _ I 4'" - 4. REMAIN ch OF•0`37 ,' h'Oi 6NClLuE0 to +z °•I L EF'c • Ea ' OINE STORY a_ • „4 •.. P.ESIDENCE = : 'r /Li e BuiL�uC I '�, I v 0'Ee 3, . In E1n' - PEKE EDWARD A.PAC, JR. I I -• •T > t FL05154 P.L.S HM.r4734 ' I >\ 2�.E' ��j--A/C 1 D NOTE: THE PROPERTY�EOCPIPTION SHOWN HTREEON ; t5 FURN'THFE `+ `I. I E J k HAS NOT SEEN ASS A TCb BY THE UNDER_IGNEO� OR.E45EMcN S T - /�%r .."— r-'";' 7_...t4,\ RfOHTS-OF-WAY-U REIiE,YATIONS OF IPERS SD UVDEPGROUVO UTILI,I€5 84.82 8JlD1LC N F" 3/4'p d fOETA NE N5 V N�S O'T,LOCATED SUCH IN PRATE TLE w FE J/d'I' \Cov_ 1c CUAs 8E-0ETA'NEO & VERIFIED 6.ATtiEkS THROUGH. APPROPRIATE-.TITLE Ndu VERIFICATION, PAC SURVEYING LOT 38 581-3E6-9E37 Voice 561-365-26EC For occsu'vebellsouti.net EMAI, ELEVATION'S APE PER NATIONAL GEODETIC PO Bor 27E233 Bocc Rotor'Florida 3 427 VERTICAL DATJV. OF 1925. Sc Jcr 7'.: 20' Boundary Sumer For: p p�j Drsvo ET EA. FRIISHED FLOOR£LE V, = 5.E'. d TURI\TER I\TER Approved LAP Sole Surveyed:II/50d11 t PF 8Y GUESTHOUSE FLOOR ELEA. = 55' GARAGE FLOOR ELEV = N/A Revsbnc BASE F.000 ELEV. = 7' Fled Bao4 84 For a2 THE.PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREON IS IN A ZONE A-E FL000 PLAIN AS PER THE NATIONAL FLOOD This Sur*/snot Yu'd olless a is slglee Dregn9 Number. NSU,RANCE PRJSRAM FLOOD RATE MAF, 7251020002D (I-5-89) ecd sexed with c suv:yrs sea 11-6867 ,,---1--!,-.-!---,i 'v- 1-s„.. . Ti-i,„-.1- . - -, '..,..,.'.4;•-,-..'`N . .- !. ..."k=:-.?.i 7C: . ..,c.! ' .:'.. —- .,4o- -._ ,..-.44,...yer 1 ,..i-',-.-, . . .,. .--„. ,..,,,A-0„4 :"... • .,-,:-Ft.„..a,," ..,lc.,..;,'. " .• '- - .•, ._ . . , , • 4--- ,-!---- ,-..,-,i-,--g-,5.- •....'.7mt-^,-:-,s.-.. ' 1:-Ag,- '-'1 - . --,7*-. ... -4,...e.) _ . ,,,,. % , - Isi....„0-:` •-..,,•-_.,-,1..- -1,,.._a..k..- -.. .,, .,.,1,-,, . . , , ..,.. %If .. .. ., • '-474::-- . _ '':!;:. c\i';''-4-;_'-..- • '. i';',. '.....-',"4,-: •• Ar ••t`'., ",,,' •• c •" k s. ,t.. •• ._ .. _.....„._ . 4 , '-.6'\‘ • ,,,,a5 . .1 '• • ..,f.'i .. , . ,4. . •- ‘. --. .- is.kt-, • • . .4 41 71,1,-''..-.2197',:‘,-..;:'. ., ';',,-.. .i 1f5i., -.? _ .-: .fi,.•:., 5 *146../4 - . • ....;,-=.:'''-aid. '"'--- -• ..--`--i .*. 4"s.. • - , .-,--.'.: :- .-44::-...,--,-.:• - 7 , if:'-- •... 1,,?Z• , - , - • ,• - - .1,...%•,•-N•• .`--' .4-- • "-.-- ^.- .. . • • , . ,_ ----- .,,,,, _ • . .., .., T.?.- - - p..,, •'" I I "i" •• i i,•• .. I-- 1. .: II ---,',.,, ... i • : =.. • L--: 11 . .-.1-•• , ":-.---....1-.•-...-.-i_.-;,-:*'-,Nli.!.k„;:o i ' -'•,- -' •',..-. :--,„1-.., .- - -•''''---4"- --- ' ,'--. '--' A . ---- ''''' . A--' ,,- •: •" • ,A$C ''';!--.-11••4:I '-:-•F- T.-. ',.--:5.-i'4"---- 14.0...f'''1.<4 .,::. i---•--"—r • .- — .,- -_• ...4--,..- ------, --- -----, - -...-,tt:i.k---4,"• -,!41 .. ,,.; ,-; - ' '-,- ;-''Sr' •,-----;•-• ---•*. , -l'' • -. - _ 1•,-.'--..•:-,----z. ••-• '0°1 - -- , ,..--.... --,.:-.:1...! . •-•;N\ . . . • .,_-... -- .. , — , . . ti-'• ; HOUSE NORTH • , . ,7. ,,f,j .,.t.• . - •-• '''t'..7 '7-.•.1Ve.I.T.l•- • •.• ....eq... • - - ' .1 - . -....:.. • --...- 4. .. ...,,....r,. . / • - . • ,-71 -v.'' -7---,.-'-*,- %.-"- •..-' '• •, ,-:;}... . " _.-.-.:...-'•.'-,-. .' . .. 1.;—.:WiAlfr.T..?,:',---- . .,-— - . .- '.•.'" '2.-7 MI f f7 - kf If I .• . .._ , . _ - . . - . =z• -_- ---,-1----%•••-•-r-"rv"--, . -. f' , lr':,,- 1._ . -—:1_ Ill i . • • , .,. -:. , • - -%.-,,------ f- • 1•,,.:. —.,„- • • .•:v,,,_ :j.--.7:-.7----=;•••,-'--..,--,:-L..-:, /r-3.-'_..-•...' -'..1.--',..,-,.. --•,..-.' _ . _Stir". -.....5:' '-L.•:,4U `,..s.NN,'-.•'. V(-,7 .1.•_- ',-"z•---...,.,_--..'; ,-__._--_,--:7''',:-.,----...;_----;:--!'..=---:-:-.:::.-- - , . - - -. - ' -,'•'43TITI:tr" '- :,';',:', '. -''',....• :‘' •' ''•i.,,,..A:, i''''";--.--,?--_ ---...----_ -!---- -Iti0=';: -.1 .-1-__'-'49"-,,, .--;---..-:-- .4„„. - - ,- - ' '''..- -''',,v-. -• -'-'---.-i‘.•„:.--`-..174t•.- •- - '',1 '".-.-_---J. .-_,--f_."----::-. ,--it;--1'.';'--- - -.7-*.. .11' .;::,-.!-,:-.,;,;- ._ --R.,-.---__-.-----"_'-,.--.4,Ate_ __"--'•-- --- ' 1.,,,... ... — "0*".----- . I;"Af .."."-t.:,.-C", - ".:."-....-'' -i I ,' ''...• --7'. ..._ r,:.,71.,".--- ,•'' :,.4- A\ - i. ...L.-- - .VI ','.....;.. ••-""4_ .• - -."" --• - ',-- --.;..4•41-1-.;.'"' • •: ." , . - S - � �y fi v.'; 's4 f V , \` •�� tl } Imo•• - • } ' 4kr •Sza� -r.�t4y� 0 �'• �' I. • ii'• : MI r'''-''':"-----:------- 4, 7 HOUSE EAST 1 '` C f 3S {iS F.r. • t rlyt T- )1. S • 1.qIi i " • - yam• • ..„,;._:_.-..,,..„,,F..-R.••••••,--,:..:••.:-7,...: ,',,4,..-s.-.,:w„ma M i" #1,, , • A. \ %mo t :le) 11 AI' 4. •. ::,.... ,i • . ,.„,,..-7 ii . iiir #'• ', - ` 'ems _ � HOUSE EAST 2 " ;; . , . .-. f - €k it, w - -- ti,. % - ,.t _ ,, _ - -- P -: - HOUSE.SOUTH 1 - s art-,1"1"44.• 711 //FY / ..' - I 1 ' t4° # t .4 I,,. '' ' fI a HOUSE SOUT ` ' •••' '' • - OW ''i ir''',-. '‘''' 0:- ' 46,, ,,s_:''.. •''.....'-.• ..... i - ' :.'..--:-1;:,,,• S...'::.‘„,„1: elk, , •-‘. --'3 ='. 4: ...--: , .., -•• : ,•,-,_- :k -,,, . .,. IIIP.' , .---.."...•-1 _.....,—-..--._ - I:* '- i ; ..". q‘tie i 11 . .- .._.--..,, . .. '' . ' i, ;_-,;•-:-._, , _ II -•, .,. _. i ,;'• , ', 1 ', .- :' A ,17;1 .'. , '', tl ' ,H,'' -• ' „ v•-,, --.,,-; ,,,_-_,-. ott-•_-; ,.., ' . (013.rji- 47. - - ' - _ .._ ...,.r..,..,,,,..,..11,....exg.:4;,.-. :..-- ‘ _ ....,. .,,,,,zi-,..v.w - - 1-0.,,,,,i,,.-i:.:!:-.-• . • = ---.,.7.- , ''',:. ,-----,?-,„ '..._,, -,- 1,5 .-,t.•;v.-e---",... 1 -'-•', . ' 7, .„,lii _ i •1,- -,._. .1 kl---',-:;5.-,.-,e,,;-. • 5 '--'‘ ''';'-j--;- 4'' 4 -4-- _ SOUTH1-.4'*-4b"" •--1-',--2---•::::--_-.---....„ -----__.....-_,',..=!.,.. . ..„. . , *"../ --,....3,---_ :::-..-----_-.-.--- =,. • -;;,-.; . . . ,.._-.. .:, ,. - , .. _ , - _ i.. .--' _-, 1;11,1i :',--,:'• - -'',1- --.• ,ki'i L!_fliti:L4si; :-*'-..71' - ' ......4,' I ' -4-t.i..--- ,. ,_-•:,-'.v.-- - , ----'-'1`;.., Sirri Nit ,..v..---._-,--1-- ..z.' -, f -,:i.li;7isi.% './1, .t,'''' ' .N;,-,i,'',,r,v•:--' , 1 . . ii. t I 12" ': •-,-i ,‘ - '1 : r '`.:'t •-----,.. :1-is .4.. ,, I •A ,-;.• , ._ . . _ 1S -- r giii -.I _._: . • -,,- ,,-• A gi# .., ,,-.,. •, 'I' k , •. I . 1 • ?, ' - ;:tt, • ' .- , r --t' - .'•' 't : ,, %..„----- eir......r,' • -*,...fri,V,f- -- . ,$ . __4,..,:---;.-4, ' .i.----:,,,,A,- • .-,,- . _.. 1. _ .,,4..•...' 'A -_,"%.-,. -41.• „ .-_, _- ' -,'• OTT' -12. T,L--c. H iF),,g,',:_ ._- ,,,_=_ ._ 0.`",= ' /;- ,_;'1,. , _= :-_.-.4--..' ./2.4:=0. SIDING PROFILE FOR NON-ORIGI • �OF THE HOUSE, COVE SHIPLAP SIDING ,y_ _ems _. SING PROFILE FOR ORIGINAL . 5 „, 7. PORTIONS OF THE HOUSE. ` ' ROUNDED LAP-HISTORICAL --via`- a 5 N ., ( Y R v [ Y f. ? ^S '� 1` w �:_vim C-vim# . r 1 - w ,:V "C`"3y fdr-'a P. isg. '`fa" X . 5 x • I A' y sh 1F r., Y ° opp: Q " } 4.4y r fir `.l.,t Y1` S �I��j.s PIS'' '- , 70:44-, 4L i • .. \'1 VI FRENCH DOORS - CLAD WHITE, MUNTIN PATTERN PER ELEVATIONS ., 1 ,I'' , , , , .4. i , 1 t. \ -- :, 1 r.;ii• : L _. rTT fr"0:' IP„ loll- 1 '1'4 , [I.- FRONT DOOR-FBERGLASS PIWYflf BLUE Ii I I i I I. I D A II I I, i ' I II � I , 1. , 1 1I HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT Property Owners: Charles W. and Carolyn Schroth Authorized Agent: Perez Design, LLC; Francisco Perez-Azua, Architect Project Location: 130 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District HPB Meeting Date: December 18, 2013 File: 2014-037 ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is the consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) associated with the demolition of a contributing dwelling and accessory structure, and new construction of a single-family residence on the property located at 130 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District, pursuant to Land Development Regulations (LDR) Section 2.2.6(D). BACKGROUND & PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject property is located on Lot 8, Block 118, Town of Delray and is zoned RM (Multi-Family Residential, Medium Density). The 6,728 square foot (50' x 135') property contains a circa 1939 Minimal Traditional style residence and detached single-car garage, both of which are one-story. The property is classified as contributing to the Marina Historic District. Building records indicate that the structure was "remodeled" in 1947, at which time a rear addition was constructed. There are no other records indicating further development or improvements on file with the City. The residence suffered roof damage in the 2004 & 2005 hurricane seasons; remnants of the original blue tarp or remnants of replacement tarps that followed remain on the site today. The property has been unoccupied since 2010. However, prior to that, the property was poorly maintained and has fallen into significant disrepair. In 2011, the Board approved a COA (2011-023) request for the demolition of the existing garage and 1947 addition, construction of new additions and alterations to the residence, and site improvements including a swimming pool, front yard gazebo, paver deck, patio, and driveway, and 4' fence along the front property line. The project approval included 5 variances and 3 waivers, as follows: • Side Interior (North) Setback Encroachment: Reduce required setback from 7'6" to 4'9" associated with additions to the historic structure; • Side Interior (North) Setback Encroachment: Reduce required setback from 7'6" to 5'6" associated with the construction of an accessory structure (Gazebo); • Side Interior (South) Setback Encroachment: Reduce side yard setback from 7'6" to 5' associated with additions to the historic structure; • Parking Requirements for Residential Uses: Allow parking spaces to be located entirely within the front setback (25'), whereas, parking is not permitted within the front setback area; • Swimming Pools, Yard Encroachment: Allow the location of a swimming pool within the front setback at 23', whereas a front setback of 25' is required; i 3C SE 7h Avenue: COA 2014-037 HPE Meeting December 18, 2013 Pace 2 of 11 • Relief from requirement to screen parking that can be viewed from the public right of way, as two parking spaces are located perpendicular to SE 7th Avenue; • Permit an arbor over 4' within the front setback; • Permit a 4' fence within the required site visibility triangles located at both the front and back drive areas. The approved project noted above was not pursued, and the property has since been sold to the current owner, who is the subject applicant. In 2012, the Board approved a COA (2014-037) for the demolition of both the historic principal and accessory structures. The approved new development, which did not require any relief from the LDRs, consisted of a one-story, single-family residence containing approximately 1,239 square feet under air, plus a 113 square foot front porch. A one-story, detached two-car garage with access off of the alley was also approved. The current request is for the demolition of both the historic principal and accessory structures and the new construction of a two-story single-family residence with an attached, one-car garage. The residence consists of a total of 3,044 square feet under roof (2,469 under-air) and is situated approximately 44'6" from the front property line (after a 5' right of way dedication). The primary living space of the residence is contained within the two-story portion with a one-story component to the rear which includes the garage. The front elevation is broken up by a two-story covered porch and balcony on a portion of the façade, with slightly arched lower level openings. The exterior materials consist of a smooth or lightly textured stucco lower level (Atrium White) and stucco simulated siding (Pale Oak) on the upper level with a standing seam metal roof (Silver Metallic). Aluminum, impact-rated windows (white) are proposed throughout and consist of 2/1 single-hung, 4-light picture window, and fixed, four-light windows. Site improvements include a swimming pool within the front yard surrounded by a paver deck, and accessed by a walkway from the front property line and through the proposed arbor. A 4' high concrete wall spans the front property line while a PVC fence measuring 4' in height plus finials at each post span the side yard property lines. A 7' high wall is proposed at the rear of the property. Vehicular access is provided from the alley at the rear of the property where a paver driveway is proposed for the garage, as well as an aluminum gate which will open and provide access to additional parking in the back yard of the property. Due to the proposed 7' wall adjacent to the driveway off of the alley at the rear of the property, a waiver to reduce the sight visibility triangle at this point of access has been submitted. The relief sought is to reduce the required 10'x10' sight visibility triangle requirement to 4'x10'. The subject COA is now before the Board for consideration. SITE PLAN & DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. Zoning and Use Review Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.6(F)(1), RM Development Standards, the provisions for the R-1-A District shall apply for single family detached dwellings. The subject property is located within the RM zoning district; it's proposed use is single-family residential and has been reviewed accordingly. 130 SE 7`'Avenue:COA 2014-037 HPB Meeting December 18. 2013 Page 3 cf 11 Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), Development Standards, properties located within the R-1-A zoning district shall be developed according to the requirements noted in the chart below. As illustrated, the proposal is in compliance with the applicable requirements. Requirement I Proposed_ Setbacks: Front (East) 25' 1 44'6"* Side Interior (North) 7'6" _ 7'8" Side Interior (South) 7'6" 7'8" Rear (West) 10' 12'11" Height (Maximum) 35' 25'4" *Plan indicates 49'6" setback; a 5' right of way dedication is required, setback is measured from the new property line. STAFF COMMENT: As illustrated above, the proposal meets the Development Standard requirements. Therefore, positive findings can be made. Supplemental District Regulations Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.15, Swimming Pool, Whirlpools, & Spas: Yard Encroachment, swimming pools shall not extend into the front setback area noted in Section 4.3.4 (K). STAFF COMMENT: The swimming is properly placed on the property with its current dimensions and lot area. However, a 5' right of way dedication (see below) is required, and therefore, the swimming pool will need to be set back an additional 5' in order to comply with the 25' setback requirement from the new property line. This revision has been listed as a condition of approval. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.14(B), Sight Visibility Triangle Measurements, the area on both sides of a driveway formed by the intersection of a driveway and a street or alley with a length of ten (10) feet along the driveway, a length of ten (10) feet along the street or alley right-of-way and the third side being a line connecting the ends of the other two lines. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.14(C), Intersections, when an accessway intersects a public right- of-way, all visual obstructions within the sight visibility triangle shall provide unobstructed cross- visibility at a level between three (3) feet and six (6) feet. STAFF COMMENT: A 7' high wall and gate are located at the rear of the property, adjacent to the driveway and encroaching into the sight visibility triangle area. As a result, a waiver to reduce the sight visibility triangle has been requested and is analyzed further in this report. Although the gate will be perpendicular to the alley and accessed from the driveway, its proximity to the alley is of concern. Therefore, in order to eliminate the blocking of vehicular traffic in the alley, the gate must be electric and able to open via remote. This has been added as a condition of approval. Right-of-Way Dedication Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.1(D)(2), and the Transportation Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan, the required right-of-way width for SE 7th Avenue is 60'. Currently 40' of right-of-way exists for SE 7th Avenue. However, the Development Services Management Group (DSMG) reviewed a prior application at their December 17, 2010 meeting and waived the 60' requirement, but required the right of way to expand to fifty feet (50'). Therefore, a five-foot (5') dedication (half the distance of the difference) is required, and this has been added as a condition of approval. Installation of the 5' 130 SE 7`''Avenue:COA 2014-037 HPB rvieeting December 18, 2013 Page 4 of 11 sidewalk was also requested from the DSMG, and is added as a condition of approval. It is noted that the dedication will need to be accepted by the City Commission prior to the issuance of a building permit. WAIVER ANALYSIS Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the approving body shall make a finding that the granting of the waiver: (a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; (b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; (c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; and, (d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.14(B), Sight Visibility Triangle Measurements, The area on both sides of a driveway formed by the intersection of a driveway and a street or alley with a length of ten (10) feet along the driveway, a length of ten (10) feet along the street or alley right-of-way and the third side being a line connecting the ends of the other two lines. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.14(C), Intersections, when an accessway intersects a public right- of-way, all visual obstructions within the sight visibility triangle shall provide unobstructed cross- visibility at a level between three (3) feet and six (6) feet. The applicant has submitted the following in support of the requested relief: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(8), we respectfully request a waiver to LDR Section 4.6.14, Site Triangle, be granted based on the following findings: (a) Granting of the waiver would not adversely affect the neighboring area. Few properties have vehicular access along this particular alley, therefore vehicular access is minimum. The reduced site visibility triangle would have negligible impact on the neighboring area. (b) Granting of the waiver would not diminish the provision of public facilities. The alley right-of-way remains unaffected; therefore there is no impact of public facilities. (c) Granting of the waiver would not create and unsafe situation. Because of the nature of the property use as a single-family home, very low vehicular counts are expected from this property. Furthermore, the reduced visibility triangle would not impact the general public. It would only impact the property owner, who would always have knowledge of the visibility conditions. Finally, there are very few properties in this block that have access to this particular alley; therefore, traffic impact is expected to be minimal. (d) Granting of the waiver would not result in the granting of a special privilege since the same waiver can be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. STAFF COMMENT: The request is to reduce the sight visibility triangle at the rear of the property from 10'x10' to 4'xl 0', due to a proposed wall measuring 7' in height. In consideration of the waiver criteria above, the request will not adversely affect the neighboring area in that the location of the proposed wall is typical of the alleyway, and forcing the wall to further encroach into the property would provide less security and division from the CBD zoned property to the rear, which faces SE 6th Avenue/South Federal Highway. Public Facilities would not be impacted by this waiver. An unsafe situation, however, cannot be determined. Not only is the sight visibility triangle reduced, but the height of the fence within the required triangle area exceeds the maximum 3' height. Waivers have been granted to permit 4' high fences within a maintained 130 SE 7 Avenue: COA 2014-037 HPB Meeting December 18,2013 Page 5ofi11 10'xl0' triangle. However, the proposed fence measures 7' in height (Staff recommends the height be reduced to 6'). While the alley is not frequently utilized at the moment, this alleyway has the potential to become significantly busier when the development on the parcel to the rear occurs. The Board must determine whether or not the granting of this waiver would be considered a special privilege. If the wall were reduced to a height of 4' then the waiver would be supported and would not be considered a special privilege in that this height has been approved in similar circumstances. Therefore, positive findings cannot be made to reduce the sight visibility triangles at the rear vehicular access ways. DESIGN ELEMENTS ANALYSIS Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H)(5), Prior to approval, a finding must be made that any Certificate of Appropriateness which is to be approved is consistent with Historic Preservation purposes pursuant to Objective A-4 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and specifically with provisions of Section 4.5.1, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. LDR Section 4.5.1 (E) Development Standards: All new development or exterior improvements on individually designated historic properties and/or properties located within historic districts shall, comply with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and the Development Standards of this Section. Relief from Subsections (1) through (9) below may be granted by seeking a waiver approvable by the Historic Preservation Board, unless otherwise stated. (E)(2)(b)(1,3), Major and Minor Development: The subject application is considered "Major Development", as it is new construction in a historic district, and "the construction, reconstruction, or alteration of any part of the front façade of an existing contributing residential structure..." STAFF COMMENT: The proposed demolition and new construction classify the subject request as "major development." (E)(3)(a)1., Buildings, Structures, Appurtenances and Parking; Fences and Walls: c. Fences and walls over four feet(4) shall not be allowed in front or side street setbacks. d. Non-historic and/or synthetic materials are discouraged, particularly when visible from a public right of way. e. Decorative landscape features, including but not limited to, arbors, pergolas, and trellises shall not exceed a height of eight feet(8) within the front or side street setbacks. STAFF COMMENT: The proposal includes a 4' high privacy wall along the front property line, a 4' high PVC fence along the side property lines, and a 7' high wall along the rear property lines. The height of the front wall complies with the requirement; however, the material should be revised to wood in order to soften its appearance and provide a more appropriate aesthetic along the streetscape. As noted above, synthetic materials are discouraged, and therefore, the PVC fence should also be revised by eliminating its use on the property and replacing it with an appropriate material such as wood. While not specified, the proposed 7' wall to the rear is located along the rear alley and will be visible from the right of way. This height should be reduced to 6' which is a typical height approved for such features along the alley. i 30 SE 7.'Avenue:COA 2014-037 HPB Meeting December 18. 2013 Pa0e 6 or 11 In addition, an arbor is proposed at the front of the property and consists of concrete posts with an aluminum gate and wood rafters and brackets. The arbor, which measures approximately 8'9" to the top of the rafters, needs to be reduced to a total of 8' in height. Further, if the front wall material is revised, the arbor posts should also be revised to an appropriate material consistent with the fence. The aforenoted revisions are listed as recommended conditions of approval. (E)(3)(a)2.a.-b, Buildings, Structures, Appurtenances and Parking; Garages and Carports: a. Garages and carports are encouraged to be oriented so that they may be accessed from the side or rear and out of view from a public right of way. b. The orientation of garages and carports shall be consistent with the historic development pattern of structures of a similar architectural style within the district. (E)(3)(b)1., Buildings, Structures, Appurtenances and Parking; Parking: Parking areas shall strive to contribute to the historic nature of the properties/districts in which they are located by use of creative design and landscape elements to buffer parking areas from adjacent historic structures. At a minimum, the following criteria shall be considered: a. Locate parking adjacent to the building or in the rear. b. Screen parking that can be viewed from a public right-of-way with fencing, landscaping, or a combination of the two. c. Utilize existing alleys to provide vehicular access to sites. d. Construct new curb cuts and street side driveways only in areas where they are appropriate or existed historically. e. Use appropriate materials for driveways. f. Driveway type and design should convey the historic character of the district and the property. STAFF COMMENT: The proposal includes a one-car garage gaining access from the rear alley and an additional parking area adjacent to the garage, also accessed from the driveway. The location of the garage is consistent with other single-family residences within the district that abut the alley. Both the driveway and ribbon drive are finished with pavers. Give the aforenoted comments, positive findings can be made. (E)(5) Standards and Guidelines A historic site, building, structure, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall only be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, as amended from time to time. Those applicable Standards are noted below: New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. (Standard#9) New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. (Standard#10) 130 SE 7`°Avenue: COA 2014-037 ' HPB Meeting December 18, 2013 Page 7 of 11 (E)(7) Demolition: Demolition of historic or archaeological sites, or buildings, structures, improvements, and appurtenances within historic districts shall be regulated by the Historic Preservation Board in the manner described in Section 4.5.1(F). Demolition of any structure, whether contributing or non-contributing, shall not occur until a building permit has been issued for the HPB approved redevelopment. All structures approved for demolition and awaiting issuance of a building permit for the redevelopment shall be maintained in a manner similar to that in which it existed at time of application unless the Chief Building Official determines that an unsafe building condition exists in accordance with Section 4.5.1(G). STAFF COMMENT: The proposed demolition of a contributing principal and accessory structure requires that the building permit for the HPB approved new development not occur until the building permit has also been issued. The structure has significantly deteriorated in the last 7-10 years, and subsequent to a complete review of the demolition, the request was approved by the Board in 2011. (E)(8) Visual Compatibility Standards All improvements to contributing buildings, structures and appurtenances thereto within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. In addition to the Zoning District Regulations, the Historic Preservation Board shall apply the visual compatibility standards provided for in this and other criteria set forth elsewhere in Section 4.5.1. (a) Height: The height of proposed buildings or modifications shall be visually compatible in comparison or relation to the height of existing structures and buildings in a historic district for all major and minor development. For major development, visual compatibility with respect to the height of residential structures, as defined by 4.5.1(E)(2)(a), shall also be determined through application of the following: 1. Building Height Plane (BHP): The building height plane technique sets back the overall height of a building from the front property line. (b) Front Facade Proportion: The front facade of each building or structure shall be visually compatible with and be in direct relationship to the width of the building and to the height of the front elevation of other existing structures and buildings within the subject historic district. (c), Proportion of Openings (Windows and Doors), The openings of any building within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the openings exemplified by prevailing historic architectural styles of similar buildings within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors to the height of windows and doors among buildings shall be visually compatible within the subject historic district. (d) Rhythm of Solids to Voids: The relationship of solids to voids of a building or structure shall be visually compatible with existing historic buildings or structures within the subject historic district for all development, with particular attention paid to the front facades. (e) Rhythm of Buildings on Streets: The relationship of buildings to open space between them and adjoining buildings shall be visually compatible with the relationship between existing historic buildings or structures within the subject historic district. (f), Rhythm of Entrance and/or Porch Projections: The relationship of entrances and porch projections to the sidewalks of a building shall be visually compatible with existing architectural styles of entrances and porch projections on existing historic buildings and structures within the subject historic district for all development. (g), Relationship of Materials, Texture, and Color, The relationship of materials, texture, and color of the facade of a building and/or hardscaping shall be visually compatible with the predominant materials used in the historic buildings and structures within the subject historic district. (h) Roof Shapes: The roof shape, including type and slope, of a building or structure shall be visually compatible with the roof shape of existing historic buildings or structures within the subject historic district. The roof shape shall be consistent with the architectural style of the building. 130 SE 7 Avenue: COA 20`4-037 H,'B Meeting December 18. 2013 Pale3of11 (i) Walls of Continuity: Walls, fences, evergreen landscape masses, or building facades, shall form cohesive walls of enclosure along a street to ensure visual compatibility with historic buildings or structures within the subject historic district and the structure to which it is visually related. (j) Scale of a Building: The size of a building and the building mass in relation to open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, porches, and lot size shall be visually compatible with the building size and mass of historic buildings and structures within a historic district for all development. To determine whether the scale of a building is appropriate, the following shall apply for major development only: 1. For buildings wider than sixty percent (60%) of the lot width, a portion of the front façade must be setback a minimum of seven (7) additional feet from the front setback line: 2. For buildings deeper than fifty percent (50%) of the lot depth, a portion of each side facade, which is greater than one story high, must be setback a minimum of five (5) additional feet from the side setback line: (k) Directional Expression of Front Elevation: A building shall be visually compatible with the buildings, structures, and sites within a historic district for all development with regard to its directional character, whether vertical or horizontal. (I) Architectural Style: All major and minor development shall consist of only one (1) architectural style per structure or property and not introduce elements definitive of another style. STAFF COMMENT: The proposed new construction, while of a larger scale and mass than the existing historic structure, strives to minimize its impact on the historic streetscape by increasing the distance from the street and placing the traditional back yard in the front yard with a swimming pool and deck area while the garage and additional parking area is provided at the rear of the property. The required front setback is 25', and the proposed setback is 44'6" (after dedication). Additionally, a two-story, open air front porch is provided to break up the front elevation. However, the plans do not presently meet the Building Height Plane requirement and therefore, requires a slight modification to eliminate this encroachment. This can be achieved by decreasing the roof slope, and shifting the building slighting further back on the property. The proposed materials and finishes are commonly found in proposed new construction and provide a pleasant design. However, within the historic districts, these combinations should be varied and also include historic design types. For example, the smooth or lightly textured stucco on the first story with the stucco siding on the second story should be revised to a historic typology which consists of all siding. This revision to all stucco siding has been added as a recommended condition of approval. Additionally, the standing-seam metal roof would be more aesthetically appropriate as a concrete tile roof. The proposed windows are appropriate in both type and configuration. However, the additional muntins on the doors are not necessary as there is not a true transom window, and therefore, these muntins should be removed. Further, the four-light picture windows flanked by the 2/1 single- hung windows should be revised to a single-light, true picture window. Additional historic details such as shutters and shutterdogs would add character to the new construction and provide a more appropriate solution. It should be noted that the scale of the building is larger than that of the existing historic homes. However, the technical requirements for "Scale of a Building" have been met, and is therefore considered to be "appropriate" by this Visual Compatibility Standard. In an attempt to reduce the scale, it is suggested that the roof pitch be reduced from 5/12 to 4/12 which will reduce the overall height of the structure. 130 SE 7'"Avenue:COA 2014-037 ' HPB Meeting December 18, 2013 Page 9o'11 Based on the comments provided above, positive findings can be made with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8), subject to compliance with the recommended revisions. (F) Restrictions on Demolitions: No structure within a Historic District or on a Historic Site shall be demolished without first receiving a Certificate of Appropriateness pursuant to Section 2.4.6(H). The Historic Preservation Board shall be guided by the following in considering such a request. (1) The Historic Preservation Board upon a request for demolition by a property owner, shall consider the following guidelines in evaluating applications for a certificate of appropriateness for demolition of designated historic sites, historic interiors, or buildings, structures, or appurtenances within designated historic districts; (a) Whether the structure is of such interest or quality that it would reasonably fulfill criteria for designation for listing on the national register. (b) Whether the structure is of such design, craftsmanship, or material that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty or economically nonviable expense. (c) Whether the structure is one of the last remaining examples of its kind in the designated historic district within the city. (d) Whether retaining the structure would promote the general welfare of the city by providing an opportunity to study local history, architecture, and design, or by developing an understanding of the importance and value of a particular culture and heritage. (e) Whether there are approved plans for immediate reuse of the property if the proposed demolition is carried out, and what effect those plans will have on the surrounding area. STAFF COMMENT/ANALYSIS: In consideration of the above, the existing structure does not individually fulfill criteria for designation on the National Register. The simple Minimal Traditional style is likely one which is easily replicated understanding that the craftsmanship would inherently differ due to modern technological changes and value engineering. The structure is not one of the last remaining examples of its kind, yet this should not always justify demolition of a historic structure. While retaining the structure would assist in promoting local history and historic architectural styles, the structure is in such disrepair that this would not be beneficial. The requested demolition is accompanied by a new development request which should not have a negative impact on the surrounding area, subject to compliance with the recommended conditions of approval. Based on the above, positive findings can be made with respect to the subject Section. (2) No decision of the Board shall result in undue economic hardship for the property owner. The Board shall determine the existence of such hardship in accordance with the definition of undue economic hardship found in Subsection (H). (3) The Board's refusal to grant a Certificate of Appropriateness requested by a property owner for the purpose of demolition will be supported by a written statement describing the public interest that the Board seeks to preserve. (4) The Board may grant a certificate of appropriateness as requested by a property owner, for demolition which may provide for a delayed effective date. The effective date of the certificate will be determined by the Boa-rd based on the relative significance of the structure and the probable time required to arrange a possible alternative to demolition. The Board may delay the demolition of designated historic sites and contributing buildings within historic districts for up to six months 130 SE 7 Avenue:COA 2014-037 HPB Meeting December 18. 2013 Page 10 of 11 while demolition of non-contributing buildings within the historic district may be delayed for up to three months. (5) As a condition of the Certificate of Appropriateness approval for demolition, the Board may require that the applicant take such steps as it deems necessary to preserve the structure requested for demolition including consultation with community groups, public agencies, and interested citizens, recommendations for acquisition of property by public or private bodies, or agencies, and exploration of the possibility of moving one or more structures or other features. (6) The Board may, with the consent of the property owner, request that the owner, at the owner's expense, salvage and preserve specified classes of building materials, architectural details and ornaments, fixtures, and the like for reuse in the restoration of the other historic properties. The Board may, with the consent of the property owner, request that the Delray Beach Historical Society, or the owner, at the owner's expense, record the architectural details for archival purposes prior to demolition. The recording may include, but shall not be limited to photographs, documents, and scaled architectural drawings to include elevations and floor plans. Two (2) copies of such recordings shall be submitted to the City's Planning and Zoning Department. One (1) to be kept on file and the other to be archived with the Delray Beach Historical Society. At the Board's option, and with the property owner's consent, the Board or the Delray Beach Historical Society may salvage and preserve building materials, architectural details, and ornaments, textures, and the like at their expense, respectively. (7) The owner shall provide the following information on his/her application for any contributing structure in a historic district or individually designated historic structure: (a) A certified report from a registered architect or engineer which provides documentation explaining that the building is structurally unsound and is damaged beyond the ability to repair it at a reasonable cost. The report must include photographs to substantiate the damage. (b) A certified report from an engineer, architect, general contractor, or other qualified professional which documents the projected cost of repairing the structure and returning it to a safe and habitable condition. (c) An appraisal of the property in its current condition, its value as vacant land and its potential value as a preserved and restored historic property. (d) Documentation that reasonable efforts have been made to find a suitable alternate location for the structure within the City of Delray Beach to which the contributing/ individually designated historic structure could be safely relocated. STAFF COMMENT/ANALYSIS: In 2011, the Board was provided detailed reports and documentation regarding the condition of the structures at that time, the economic feasibility to maintain the structure, and appraisal of the property. The information demonstrated that the request for demolition was justified, and, therefore, the Board approved the demolition of both structures. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness (2014-037) for 130 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. 130 SE 7`'Avenue: COA 2014-037 ' HPB Meeting December 18. 2013 Pace 11 of 11 C. Move denial of the Certificate of Appropriateness (2014-037) for 130 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request does not meet the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. (Motion to be phrased in the affirmative. See above) RECOMMENDATION Certificate of Appropriateness Move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness (2014-037) for demolition and new construction at the property located at 130 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: 1. That ALL PVC fence and gate materials be eliminated and replaced with appropriate materials such as wood or aluminum; 2. That the front gate be revised to 4' in height; 3. That all gates be revised to wood from aluminum, or to an aluminum capped picket style; 4. That the front and rear concrete walls be revise to wood fence of an appropriate style; 5. That the front entry arbor have a maximum height of 8' to the top of the rafters; 6. That the arbor posts be revised from concrete to wood, and be consistent with the fencing material around the property; 7. That revised plans reflect compliance with the Building Height Plane ratio of 2:1; 8. That the muntins be removed from the entry doors and consist of a single-light; 9. That the roof material be revised to concrete tile or asphalt shingle, or another material which simulates a roof tile aesthetic; 10. That decorative shutters and shutter dogs be provided; 11. That the lower level stucco be revised to stucco siding; 12. That the roof slope be reduced to a 4/12 pitch; 13. That the vehicular access gate at the rear of the property be electric and able to open via remote, with note indicating this on the plans; 14. That the swimming pool location be revised to meet the 25' front setback, from the new property line after dedication; 15. That the front property line be adjusted to accommodate the 5' right of way dedication, and eliminate the noted 5' sidewalk easement; 16. That the City Commission approve the dedication prior to the issuance of a building permit; 17. That the sidewalk adjacent to the property along SE 7th Avenue be installed. Waiver: LDR Section 4.6.14(C), Sight Visibility Triangle Intersections At the Board's discretion. (Alternative: Recommend approval to the City Commission to reduce the sight visibility triangle from the required 10')(10' to 4'x10', based upon positive findings to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5).) Report Prepared by:Amy E. Alvarez, Historic Preservation Planner • . 4-- -...--;'' . . - - . , '.• '. ' . .'*".:. ht ''....` 7.. - .„,,,. , . . , 4,j.,. . .. fi 1; ' ' - -.. - • - '' - ' .-.''',--4141e'' - 1-. 1k,' '7 , •-...; ;'''' ---'7$7- , '4 • +, - '- 44*-•,,, -: : ..t....yjek, - 342:- ' f- i ,--'• • . • . .f. a is. _- , • .,. 1 - .,. -4r. • se'-,P , _., . . . -, ipor-,--- - - .1.1 . --',.44 -. ,-,_ . 1.......;."".-- '.""' ' *41 '*' '' '''11-1 ' •: ,e`' • ..,,m,........ .. . ,:..*1.14 '''''...-.N.'.,, •±-''4....;.,,.- "•••••,...- ---••••.'.'''''..., Av". '''''''.. .'I.'-. , ,-- . . ---_----- — • ----- . . . _ . NUM .".................• ,• .,..,.,• ,. • Ilimum,m.r.---:.'.--- - 2' .414.4-, 43,SF..-••/,'•"••- ----:-'7...-..,-:, `'-:_r•' -.' - s-' i '' _...............-.-_-_.._ . 94, . .. ••• ....: );..r. - -.._!_-_--_-. 77-..-4--.:- k tairVklifit ti-''',--:''?"-,0,1i; .= -..,..... , ....... "--,---_,,---4. 1.:.,. ••2'. C''''' . -'-• :.-: .IF', ;,.,4:7-.' •-1'.-.-- ft: == ..- -7-----=: • ..._.........................t,. ----` if ;•:::::••••----"..-' _.;"':., ; ;.•:...:,•,0...,.- --a----,-.--4 .• l'''.1 ----" ---*••• 00 ...„; L'. --.I, frf:- -N-TL._ Ki-',:f.-- --• ;•-?.*-.:-.%; : .•--'," 4tr.--,0o,,, . , ' : •'• _ . . ,...'.'„-• --:.- ,...i'•'••-'t--`'..-'-'' '-'' ' ' - • ---- •••--,...,....-----! ,- ,-.7 •''' ,-, _ _s._2 -,.... : . _ . - • • 7 . --- . •, ,---., _________-_-,1 ' 1 , ''1;°.- • --:''.-:' '' .:1-i. ,.1.' JO,-.7.44-2•Y'r.- - .. _.. .;*4,,:.4540:4. 2'.. ' • . . _ ------i ,',. , • -%.:.7- ;, \,"4,1- .-k".., -...-,._. , , . .. .7 .4,:•,,,--i., ,,:vv...-,..---.s.,,,,,--::;,..,.., _. • East Elevation NE Corner .,. .4,-,e.ffioAl . ,,,-•- -7-,-- - . -...,e,.-..1 : .,, -.......7- --, .• - k v; '''''X _,‘..\\Ii\-.:.... •: * ...I,'.ffi , A _ - it. •••. 1.• -4' „... - .4.4- 4 •' ..- , ._ - ,11f. .- -..i..‘t-- _.-0_11.4;,' -ThilThi 2 ... ...,.. ... -. •,•, ; .- _ : .... — . . . . - • -":1:::; - -: ''''.j•;•:•.:7i; -• .•::...'1,1-:.-714:4...r • , . ............, Vi.- • -4 ' -'4i. .tli`el•• • :4 - -...-i__ •:., i'.---1•:.54-1..;7a..--____-______-- .• .----- t,- t e " •,--. . , em,..............____.. i -'-, • ....- • -- .! ., ,, • ,v. .. 1•M=....•••••••••••".... . ..- - '41, r.„.....•'. '.,,''A - „,,,,.... kr7,'i-A •••,......" ....."'',--,41-_-71e4.-7,,..-' - V ' - ../.; --- ' e, ............./ '. .1:4:7517.e:,,.<3. - ;„7.-,i':,..,:7.'• . t_. .. '.• -• 000, `----...„....* - _-;...,,-_. '--',4"Cilf•7'•i A\. ',.-7?,:r.;:;i---7.7 .-3,:i- ----"" .. . • ---..--.... _. -..... . .,........,-/"----'...--- , Ayr /4W)...,..;i *..-..-ig:- ••-eLq __....< •.: ---..- - . ._ ......--- _.1 „..-.--------- ---- .. , •-''' ---•" .' • . -1-r:.-;• .,:-•,-• -,r---..- -7.,:t.. -.,--,fs. --• •:.: _ •' •-:,i,...- .;',,t--'--•''''t'i••• •:. -j-.•'.-,••-fr-hi ..--:- North Elevation 1 • �� -; ,,,, ,Fy .. , -' i •` s Garage SW Corner Garage East Elevation a , t ,tea FAa A . , - .i -.... - y fir'" r. rP - , East Elevation 2 My Commission Expires: 4I 9-a( !3 H:\2006\060018 DBCRA\AGMT 201(\Mangrove Realty Exchange.doc Page 4 } t ., i A 40 . , , , . . .„ . . .... __ . . .. . ., eta - - - / ,., , . . _ -- , ter; t-,.‘,.:Iwtool,t, -- 1 _ x - --moo _ `,t, m Y- - `-sr North Elevation 3 West Elevation 1 r _ i. r_ Y ;, ,.., ....„ . . ..,„„..._ __ _ _ _ -, --, . ..,,,,. .,.:,,, ,-. t - ,bare • . West Elevation 2 Garage South Elevation ABBREVIATIONS SYMBOLS CODE INFORMATION BUILDING CODE DATA ,,:. i=r, 2010 FLORIDA BULDINGCOOES FLORIDA BOILING CODE,2010 EDITION Schroth Residence r) MR.... e..,_ Room r. 101 NATIONAL FIECTRICCODE,INED�,2015 E0Na 'USE AND OCCUPANCY CLASSIFlCATICN:GRWPRJPESIOENEAI LLC ISO SF 2010 FLORIDA ME PREVENRON CODE 'TYPEOFCONSTRUCTI0N: TYPE WBALLOWEO -�i.9N� NPA f01e UP3tOO Cab/.2roe Mon .TABLE 801i1RE RESISTANCE - T—'r` Far - 0� ooMunimo 6l . AEOUIREMEOTS FOR OLD,ELEMENTS: � AND ALL OTHER RULES,REWUTIONS,ANDCODESIeVROJIJRISDIGi%NI ONWRS FORAM BUILDING 130 SE 7th Avenue *FMLE 602 FIRE RESISTANCE Delray Beall,Florida u�r.,,.,�,.,a"a, SOIL ENGINEERING NOTE FOR EXTERIOR WALLS) 20X>60).0 HOURS .A002... P,a,":."a:wa..., tt Gam. THESE DRAWINGS NAVE BEEN PREMED TTNEAPSUI-wnnn. Q MAMMON TIUTTNEBEARIxO CAPADITV CF lNESOILI52600 PSF OR GREATER. SCOPE OF WORK: IA 029THEOENESULTS DS00 TE RE5SLEBLEi0R5l®WITIND901L - — -- -- - n�.n 1•20. O TESTSRESULTS AND AOEOTECNNICAL EX➢LORATION REPgiT TO THE DFIACUTION OF BIALDING,97E CAFAMNG,SdIPREPAPATWN. iiii ThESE CTANOTNECLIENi, NE000NGRAM, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL STRICTLY FOLLOW UL NW CONSTRUCTION OFM'OSTORY SINGLE FAMILY NOIRE WMTN ] RECOMMENDATONS.INST COT. BAND SPECIGIGTIONSINCLUDED ASSOGATEO POOL,DECKS,LANDSCAPE AREAS,PRIVACY WALLS AND IN TXEGEOTECNNICALLREPONT. WALKWAYS. , M. IMAM u a w w DRAWING LIST -�L�L �"a.—I .. I ..d. SEFAuw.w�M Imo -nxF.. Rw1.e1.I I 411:C ., ., - — r I .:.. I u • ��MI. 1- : , ems ,� -__ Ail ��i_ oil-111 �' _ 1�! ; o ( PROWESS SET •I1;1_ _ F NOT FOR CONSTRUCTS% i, • au II lu II Imo IA, It . lyr A 1, . . _ • ' Ph: ill 1 . 0. �II - r B '�N ,,61 1----j-----1 �f W m / U ' / Tittle Sheet Residential FaOr .9 - ... 10414 PROJECT TEAM AIM8IELT• SIMMNVAL 0.11FRR, MEV.ENCANEER: CIVIL ENGINEER: LNLSCAK AAMIECT: SNOEYOR: DIMNOa1e1Ua T B D FAE CmmiWg 1BD TLID O'BMn,S01.10100 Xn A000 65Sou6M.t Ssad Amu. A.m.Dal 164ONW.Lod Averue Ad0n.Uai Ad*ese Um 965 NW 17N Aveue,Slaa 2.1 Diet Bath,FL 33111 CAN/,Sue bp Cade Boa R-n,FL3NO2 dry.SO..29Cad. City,SW,ZPCod. Delray Bo.FL 00115 TN:5812792OW 41',561.8W3B11 TO. Fu: TN:561391.PN2 Far 561391.Po98 TO: Fe: Ti: FM: Tel 56112764501 • • F.,..v..... ..",....a.".. LLC 1 I a..`w s .wu�....,,.„...1W* „-�.,,-,,,Loorret ,,.,,.,-o, Perez Design* POUR. P119.0 NM Building Area Legend Building Area Legend i m°��. MI 1.0 .. 1/4110 ❑Second Level j Covered Patio a YAXIL 0.•ROM NW OTaDedc.t.erd2 First Level 1 .,..... WM g O T.O.SIeb{ I °f One Car Garage 2 mr.ra ,� ,., ,rS T.,............ SEAL MO MN .0 RR Pm... e" i O. Aso.neer MR DV PROPERTY LINE tee. 111R •_ .' I .., I 'i I ' li 11 i 1,1 5 i Redden E RI' . . . .� . > °. , � L.—, ir' c; .. lir rI nao.PE CA ". ..�...�...a. ... . a)-0 • 1gorf1,5 I f J �r I 1p- PPOPFR Y ME �]d 17 J El 's O _g V lI ,I------ O 6NPLeR Pro PPP ® . Slte Plan ...... C...... A100 cp [-----._.. c 0 0 PROPER1*11112 0 I Perez Design LLC ••••••••-•1••••-.1*. ) — -—-—--—...---.1__ .>) di 1 i I 1;1173 = 1 L_ I' Proposed 0 :1 FIA71101111Y I 1'::18t19!)'',"•..):)'' ": ,_'_.:117-- PrI**sed Tw° 'i Two Sto„ SW OF WAY 4 11 1 0_0_1.r Covered I. P' r I i I, 1_1 •, =,-_•__ _ _ C) s,(..,,, I v I I ' I SEAL i.)-2-- 1-0-. -•-•.,- ' -s, f, 30 r ,i I sn..=,:r.,,.7.,,,• ,,,,,,,...6.,,,,......,...,,,,....., ah Ill'T ti---, ,,-, , . • ,, I %,I : _,_________ a-.--, ' i,.1) ]ao 2,"--' '4 :1„...-LL---•--•-I__ _ --CD -— 1 .) ./__I —- L=1:oo-Dn I 0 1 - , ...,.....----E,.- PROPERTY 1142 I - ---..-2...)7T• II I i'' • 1 dil) (13 0 (t) LDR SECTION AGA ID PI ID.SCALE OF A BUILDING• I ACTUAL LOT WON•5.2* LER SEC=4 5 IT 21 0)la IS NOT APPLICABLE LOT DEPTH•135 EX V%•87.75) MOMS'BUILD)12 DEPTH*4 I 31 PCOPOSESEctraco DEPTH IS LESS'MN FIFTY PERM'OF 71E LOT DEPT* • LER SECTERI 4 5 IS)pi 5)2b IS NOT APPLICABLE CA-Vf-A" (1) a) c) c (1-T, (7 T (-1--) Proposed Two T ZS .._ co 11 t t t 1 Story , 1.0707 a) st.g 1 1 1 1 Residence 1 , 12E tl CO 0 g S., • I ) ) 1 n-•• _,.....---- i.— ..0 "ob ti w . T OPLot•-CcR - ) 1, -,,•-k • TO Cabl.* Land Development• L - •' - ' _I /-- 04'r Regulations 7172'V( I I I I 1 LDR SECTION 4.5.1 Ill(9)(a)(b) I...a* ea ••es lail .t.,1*••• A200 ... ,...,... • Perez Design LLC . 4 T E Q 4 n. C - o ; a--� ': T _—_— ____--_-- - SELL asea — O — ..........,. 1 a , u 17 er — .w..osou E' wvnr T I ga 1 1 ,—t-- -t 0__--i -Ii. C.-- "" '-t-' •—• r --`':‘ 1.: _I r -e••'' I _. a_ --1V� I We I W L. R.C14 } I 'COI ` ® •e x f .. } 1 e.v.eN' -� :lir • --I -- PROGRESS SET -D I PnuryMe / Dints,Poem I ® I-`�.�_ ___—_—_— _— _ _ © nNO:FOR C�ONS7�AmUCTgN.. 11. rri ,_ o 1 �_ �.J II II . n' b �� —=- I 1-e 4 F----F-i - ^ @�I^ Pod De* e I II II I . �% tam,. n (o t0, I a) nm e0 0 E : �os� w o : ®, C nl F 43 ---E' _ .. f_,.1, r.7, y-v rs. l .�. v�YP —.f�--Y— T —T M \J Ct a F 1 FhneAnt ® w I ra I� «. .Cen , I O _g CO CD 611 (:-.1) 1C--)I OFRsI Fbor Pbn a•.rr First Floor Plan A21 0 • [\ =7.2 ILI C t I 0 y ��A �TSSIZ �t«�� Z1Ll�� — SEAL mZZ h;-- p ,...,... .,. a—(Nf'-,1 11 f ti `— 1 t@ i ��y y -- j1 tr; WIC. 1 I 1 ryryQy .mow _ �GK J�f. I I1" I �� i+ - ' ll— O MI • III I Q , `l / YI CI w ./ j �I I '/ ■ w II kmIIIa � 'k M PROGRESS SET e.c.� L _ ®k� ( �7 NOT FOB CONSTRUCTION if-; p e.... nTç uI( ' ®0 _-_ ]11�1-,SStS«,'.. .. w J ,fl f O 0 N a ... i Og Os« I � U �vmlF� (/) s B C B ��JJ Second Floor Plan A220 „,:a.,..4224 L----2,...i,,,,,..........._,.... ...,... c.,............,...... 1 , , 1 1 1 t mote Root ..,,901,INT, /) I { P .-.-. ',---=-7,-- 's . ' ---- l'', SEAL *Ip... b — •••/{•••ralb•=*.={01. * t I ) I '‘) r; r- ---NI s 1 N i> OH- i, amp or I! ' 1 ; 411 JA` I 1 — . terrce.” [:1,,,‘1 RIDGE N „.e, — 1 I-1 ) ;?:1 ,/, t PROGRESSSET —yLL77_77_7_,V7Z2ZLZZZZ _J-../../ 71: ——0 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Yz, AO/1/ r/ ..1,==,...'117`....... U \ fP / 1 I I,J 1 `', , I e ' 2 'si .. ) .....,.." 's, $ E ,A RIDGE .,,,,,, A k EY E orr-33'—'ooki E A EEE a) —ED--I- - ______ _______ 7_ , 0-1- - —-—-—-—-—-—-—- ,-/- -—-—- ,-s-• - - 9 - --x 77Z777777/77f/777ZZ77777 _________________ 0 ) ..—. (.1 0 I I N. - 1 El i —1I I cc il g.0 -8 1 1 I 1 1 1 I u.. ...c 1 1 1 CO Orr.P,Iaon (113 (1115 (13 CL:1) Roof Plan ........ ........., 0... i.,,,y j lo outwore...too LW 010.101/ I/Z//I '...'....''''... fiertoNallerd A260 D ...Pee 1:1;LIC Mai Doekm :Irill CNINNII T PSI LT.' FIONVINY T , (>1 , ei... rem.,,mo.olamm ------.Q.L.„..A I pm, INNONIONNY .41. ....1.0,07:717:111ONININIA ODOM ANNUM OLOMNIN 1 I A, maws ASI MIT. I _ _ I ow iii Afft I -----1-TI[II —— Prjj n LI lormemeereencre StIrkelsChirl SEAL ___, -,----' T- __ ____T 0 TIAlotish —-—-— ----- A -—--T. — TO I 11 in 1, 4,,-- • li ____ le Coe:44F 1 -- .--------- C e • "."=71:r" 110.“•••••• rill I 10 — 1.1 p,El 1 e e II 1 Lill I 1 oso I I I PROGRESS SET ] NOT FOR CONSIAUCTION ...1101NAMVNINANNI.A., 0 EtE,1711cii front T ER cf--) 0 1 i , , 1 . . 0 ,...... ..,,, ., .. , o c — C 1 C.0 ---..--- - -F----- P CC 1,„`"-_1., • ..) -, 1 _c .>,s.? ,E, -,----• 1 iLlill I — ........---- ..9._ I I I MANION, U) q,Ti29.1);NA,m12 , -—au1N---—- • x * A. ail Viirr . —a --le - _TO___Iie026 IN-$ ,ron. AM. I I Int ru 1 :I 11 47"' 1----''' I.k-1 II II MI [al-\ FM--.1.-- Exterior Mentions I I II . I .€t Lif± €' 1 I _Er iii T 'ur-j-1-1 ' 1 ' MINION• ONNNAAN — — _ TO WA au woe i I I ... I I e I e•Ar "ne. I I I i A300 O r P:."1".ale •N• ANNOY • • D T T T Pero Dosion LLC 7 _ ..,),s, , 1 , ,,, ......4.,... ........ „:„....... - —_ _ , 1,0.11.m•71 . _ ,----.-----,—.—_-. ,r--r- a 4- I 3 .... I ..: BEAL _ , _ t.00.dtivi_ko, r. ' ______ , 1.0.8m•OVV.4 ..........,......orc..... co......}••la f1 ' '''''' . , linia.,110.... /4-1- Obrigalan 15... -------5-1 f----------- X, a. • _ WI '___ iO iti r . IP i I ,.1 __ 11 . i !'1 ! 1 , ------ m ,.i I 3181.1,414 1 = , T T ot.. a.•Pear T T PRCGRESS SET NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION .41.0.141=......., -------- I ----„----... ---- ___ o ...-------0- .,-----1.---- __ c a) 1 f, ,_•r a_ • le la---11111--111--1111TI L -0 —-—-—- r , —, 0 i L--7-i ER 1 -- —ow sa-z-=ENE I ,CIF lli=- _ —. 1= —_-_-1.. .: se-. EN—Eel= I O.. CE t A ,_____-_7==- __ i_____...--- -t, I -- i ___ 1,-.''%' __ ____ • (..)---r- U) ----.-...--,:4 1-----)-—- ‘sr is• ‘46,,,, ' ,.-.). -,-- Lb_-. ._-__ ';. q 1 , . I Exterior Elevations I( 1.-41'1...••••=1"' II r ovoopon _ _ / _______r______ ' •1 0/ado ri,•r 01•01••• •••••••• .1......f 1.411: I I I i Ode 6501.111 = 0 vr.pc •Ski' A301 - ,...,... • Y T TTT no :ern D4 LI4. A e....* ..... I 1 ...,,,,>„--: - -----4,24.......• 1 1 II .......=`.... ET T —E0-.B3=11=,„... ....—. Amin .m., thillK.; 11111111 Er ,.. .....,... ...... ............eeietS,ieet :.e .,,:. ..... ._:.j,,, laj.,,,me! I ..,--- -.m.eneeet!""'" 1 veeen t -,... 1..111 tt - -i_____±-77M11111 ___TWO,•Insil4 SEAL . .•cr I C7C 1 i LOMA.Ora Son.1-. ..Z.,....,==.1..... ——--r' — TO; tp.- fonwarlIMMIRNII. 001•1110.Met. 1 4, "la, !, no i •=)-- ,, c) , 1 1 • i i ,.b 1 —-- I-It '''""" ___.—L-1 ._*__.___ ______ i ____%0._.r; 1 , , , 11 _____ _ 1 r PROGRESSSET •- =, ____._ , i.ozie.tr._4_, ED w.,N;I . NOT FOROONS1RUCTiON - . ,==.77"."%ti. *WIWI AI' 11111 VW CP CD ....... ........S) c 1 I a) __......„„___......... 1,.._ •— sl _____ T.O.Sea,Two __ . ..„-- ---- - si.$ ________ . ,, I ll I . u) a) CC _c 0 a.6 rf.. w i 0 a, 0 E P g 1;1 MN I 11 I: I 1 7 II ___T.0.0“Itirpo_ -C 0 (r) _2,.. _ _I_____ s_ r•0•16.1.7__14.. • —- - I I= a L.O.Basn•Ono.ft. , 1114111111111MMY '......„:„.— - ily•a.sp— i II Mildh,l r BuIldirtg Sections r __MEI —E_. ...,... -- 1 Deo OVA.IS 0.0".... A310 O ...4 ... ....... .wra.,.,.r.n�.,�.x ....�._,... ...._..._,....M..,d. Peres p SIC RR a r /� .. t.da.ay.d.ewy_ ! ri��" dill ilIl e I RNPMBWg Wed Alaudad ai6 Gooeenedc!11g: s rMaa Fraahi gSh rooWd F nYA wo. OEsNnekn m wow ElliSEALi15�'�' MOMOVINT na.wpou Thi �� an .10=9..�. 1.--7.z.":,4,,,..17-2.,,„:_,- -:„,,,,,,--1 r ils.L..lr - -Ili =11 - M 1 `®' r nor. i0Y�1®e.'w.e,r .. As- nano.m +L, r.. (erac 4 11. One.Slal•Wgl Seddon O W6MowSI end Head Tin detail Ealerfor Floor FFbh at Game Door Opening 2 DemtataoullooherDotal•TYPical• PROGIRESSSET NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION S it DeW O a�.ra --t.•i ...nnm, wm.n.mr.w. w.mre.Ar� — Oa INEMI•••• .EM.I ....I,. , , . i I II ......- I m I/ =.-- I p ii til h III MI "'"'"" irl; CC CD eBOaf®EIMION Tii1I SEC= i �Wmdow Trim al stucco SOd'ng DelaN Mael Flashing-Hoof Valley Sedion NMI MOOR SECTION -C Decorative Wool WWI IS i.r:v T dz.ra — O SticoAidYiOeW ..nr U a.•.DO. S ..ra 4 t inginditel InIOSIMOIN T =Tr IASPIIIMMON I 7.n. e ,ao,a ;:d 11 Exterior Architectural i it / :V Details i 0r.o.ar...rwear ll _� y� O..��.. I ! �r — �� y r.. rir ram.,� ' ___ I'p I. +.'■ ..r+r. ern.. I I�^ ',=. A400 I Tres r J" S r.ra T EveSeceon 0 Detail Sar. Camloe B Seddon DaDalaiwco ro Band Historic Preservation Board Er AGENDA ❑ SIGN IN SHEET ❑ FORM 8B 1E1 BOARD ORDER ❑ VOTING SHEET ❑ MINUTES