The URL can be used to link to this page

HPB-12-19-12 6 0 °A AGENDA foe 1.0 -44r tgr HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD Meeting Date: December 19, 2012 Time: 6:00 P.M. Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room, City Hall The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service,program,or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Smith at 243-7144 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings,and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Two or more City Commissioners may be in attendance. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA IV. ACTION ITEMS A. Certificate of Appropriateness, Waiver Request (2013-029) 11 NE 7th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District Applicant: Marc Julien Homes, LLC Property Owner: Stacy Pesacov Authorized Agent: Affiniti Architects, Benjamin Schreier Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of a single-family residence on a vacant property; and Waiver request to the Building Height Plane requirement. B. Certificate of Appropriateness (2013-059) 40 South Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District Applicant/ Property Owner: Rectory Park, LLC Authorized Agent: GE Architecture, Inc. Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the change of roof material from asphalt shingle to standing seam metal. C. Certificate of Appropriateness, Variance Request(2013-058) 220 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District Applicant/ Property Owner: John and Catherine Murphy Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a one-story, rear addition on a contributing structure; side (west) addition to the non-contributing guest cottage; and Variance request to reduce the side interior setback from 7'6" to 5' on the west side of the property. V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS Public Comments ❖ Board Members ❖ Staff VII. ADJOURN Amy E. ALvatre' Amy E. Alvarez Historic Preservation Planner Posted on: December 13, 2012 DELRAY BEACH All-America City I 0 1993 2001 SIGN IN SHEET 2001 Historic Preservation Board December 19, 2012 PRINT FULL NAME ADDRESS OR ITEM NO. ORGANIZATION 22CJ I liCie ) i vcd ectitito 0„..Q._ NA uurp yi,t/ 1-- -re 1 m,/' iictc,1,1 ft. -3----N-4-- __S)- -c,( \)- M417 1 c.. LO 1, , k 17 9-'- --- ----)-P,ve...-,. 4pucz z 1a o GO 1_ _- 0 L/) i aA, 4 f -it4--- ( &;(A'‘'L-- e---A‘2_‘-( E_Livt_o 5 4 . �1. .)iNk I d►`4. AVE Ni- e) 1(3' F) r•C7)(k) 5 ' . 0 61,)0A-' cAp vile, / its- 6--- Aais//v7-_ 4,,, xitif,: // a �C- 6 5 HPB MEETING ATTEND III. IV.A. IV.B IV.0 HELD: 11 NE 7th St. 40 S. 220 Dixie December 19, 2012 Approval of Con't to Jan Swinton Blvd. Agenda 16th Meeting NAME COA WAIVER COA COA VARIANCE VOTE to VOTE to VOTE to VOTE to VOTE to VOTE to Approve Approve Approve Approve Approve Approve Motion 5-0 3-2 Failed 2-3 Anna Maria Aponte P N Y N 6:20 Ronald Brito A A A A A A A Samuel Spear P N Y N Iris McDonald P Y Y Y Reginal Cox A A A A A A A Annie Adkins Roof P Y Y Y Annette Smith P N Y Y Adjourned: 7:30PM HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT Property Owner: Stacy Pesacov Applicant: Marc Julien Homes, LLC Authorized Agent: Affiniti Architects, Benjamin Schreier - � Or_ 1 ��r Project Location: 11 NE 7th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic DistrictJO"Piricc'f) HPB Meeting Date: December 19, 2012 File:2013-029 ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is the consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) for the construction of a two-story, single-family residence, and associated waiver request associated on the property located at 11 NE 7th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H). BACKGROUND & PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject property, which consists of Lot 6, Block 1, Del Ida Park, is located on the north side of NE 7th Street between North Swinton Avenue and NE 2nd Avenue within the Del-Ida Park Historic District. The 5,000 square foot (50'x100') vacant property is zoned R-1-AA (Single- Family Residential). The property was previously joined to the property to the west (5 NE 7th Street) via Unity of Title (dissolved in 2004) and has always been vacant. Following the dissolution, the property owner to the east (17 NE 7th Street) purchased the subject property. A COA for the installation of a fence was approved by the Board in 2010; the fence was to be located on both properties. The fence type consisted of a 4' wood picket at the front of the property, and a 6' PVC fence backward of the 30' front setback line. There are no other COAs on file regarding the subject property. At its meeting of November 14, 2012, the Board reviewed the subject COA which included a waiver to the Building Height Plane, two variances associated with the required setbacks for a new swimming pool, and a variance to permit parking within the front setback. The COA and waiver requests were continued with direction primarily due to concerns over the encroachment into the Building Height Plane area. The variance to the swimming pool side setback was denied. The variances to reduce the rear swimming pool setback to 5' and to permit parking within the front setback were approved. The aforenoted direction from the Board primarily consisted of the following: 1. That a single exterior wall finish be used throughout the structure; 2. That all materials are specified on at least one elevation; 3. That shutters be included, and shutter dogs are installed at all shutter locations; and, 4. That an additional element be incorporated on the foremost wall plane of the front elevation, such as an open porch, or balcony. 11 NE 7 h Street. Del-Ida Park COA 2013-029 HPB Meeting December 19.2012 ► Page 2 of 6 The revised plans, which are attached, have incorporated the Board's direction by making the following changes: 1. The exterior finish will be of textured stucco; 2. Paneled shutters have been applied to a majority of the windows on the front and side elevations; 3. The foremost wall plane has been broken up by recessing the windows from the wall on the first story, with a second story faux balcony above which contains a decorative rail; 4. A shed roof overhang, finished with aluminum roof material, and supportive brackets have been added above the garage; 5. The site plan reflects the approved swimming pool location, per the rear yard variance and the front yard parking variance requests that were approved by the Board on November 14, 2012; 6. The exterior color has been revised to white; 7. The color of the doors, shutters, trim, and gate has been revised to either light blue or brown, at the Board's discretion. The subject request is for the new construction of a two-story, single family residence, and swimming pool. The proposal consists of the following details: • Square Feet: 2,509 square feet (under air); 2,780 (total) o First Story: 1,156 (under air); 1,419 (total) • Non-Air Conditioned spaces: single-car garage/storage (229), covered entry (34) o Second Story: 1,339 (under air) • Materials: o Exterior: Textured Stucco o Roof: Concrete Tile o Windows: Aluminum, Impact Resistant o Shutters: Aluminum - • Colors: o Stucco: White o Roof (Hip): Silver Weathered o Windows, Fence/Wall: White o Doors, Shutters, Gate, Fascia, Trim, Railings,—2 Options: Light Blue or Brown The proposed windows consist of a mix of multi-light upper sashes with a single light in the lower sashes throughout the residence. The front door consists of a solid six panel style within the covered entry. The single-car garage, which faces NE 7th Street, is recessed from the primary wall plane by 6'6" and is located 36'6" from the front property line. A six foot high concrete block wall is attached at the interior corners of the residence and run to the side property lines. The wall will be finished in smooth stucco and contains a six foot high wood gate on each side. The existing 6' high PVC fence will remain. A waiver to the Building Height Plane requirement continues to be requested, as the second- story of the front elevation encroaches into this area. It should be noted that in 2011, the City was selected for a Transportation Enhancement Project grant from Florida Department of Transportation to fund a beautification project along NE 2nd Avenue between NE 4th Street and George Bush Boulevard. The project, boundaries of which are limited to the Del-Ida Park Historic District, will provide decorative sidewalks and crosswalks, decorative street lighting for pedestrians, landscaping improvements, and a bicycle lane. The project is anticipated to begin in February 2013 with project planning and an I 1 NE 7th Street. Del-Ida Park:COA 2013-029 ■ HP ' Meeting December 19,2012 Pagc3of8 anticipated completion date of August 2016. City Staff will notify and meet with the neighborhood when the project planning phase begins as it has not yet been determined how these improvements will be maintained (i.e. the adoption of a Neighborhood Improvement District, or by other means). It is also noted that the LDRs and Comprehensive Plan require a right of way width measuring 60' for NE 7th Street; the right of way presently measures 50. Recent new development at 112 and 116 NE 7th Street was permitted to maintain the 50' when those lots were replatted in 2005. Therefore, the same width will be maintained. This reduction will be officially confirmed by the DSMG. The COA for the new construction of a single-family residence and associated waiver are now before the Board for consideration. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSAL Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H)(5), Prior to approval, a finding must be made that any Certificate of Appropriateness which is to be approved is consistent with Historic Preservation purposes pursuant to Objective A-4 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and specifically with provisions of Section 4.5.1, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Zoning and Use Review Pursuant to LDR Section 4.1.4, Use of Lots of Record, any lot, or parcel, which qualifies as a lot of record as set forth in these Regulations, but which does not comply with respect to minimum lot area and minimum lot dimensions specified for the zoning district in which it is located, may nevertheless be used (for purposes as allowed in that zoning district), as long as it complies with all other requirements of that zoning district, subject to the following limitations: (B) A residential structure shall not be constructed on any lot, within a residential zoning district, which has frontage of less than fifty feet (50). However, this provision shall not prevent construction of a residential structure on a Single Family Lot(or Parcel) of Record which conforms with all other aspects of minimum lot size requirements but which has no frontage. Further, such a Lot of Record with no suitable access may achieve private access for a single family residence and similar uses by means of a nonpublic (private) access easement. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), Development Standards, properties located within the R-1- AA zoning district shall be developed according to the requirements noted in the chart below. As illustrated, the proposal is in compliance with the applicable requirements. I', NE 7th Street.De-id+a Park:COA 2013-029 HPB Meeting December ;9.2012 ■ - Page 4 of 8 j Requirement Proposed Minimum Lot Size (Square Feet) 9,500 5,000 Lot Width (Interior Lots) 75' 50' I j Lot Depth 100' 100' I Lot Frontage (Interior Lots) 75' 50' rMinimum Floor Area (Square Feet) 1,500 2,623.5 L Lot Coverage (Maximum) N/A 28% Setbacks: Front (South) i 30' 30-36 6 Side Interior (East) 10' 10' Side Interior (West) 10' 10' Rear (North) 10' 15'-23' Height (Maximum: Mean) j 35' 25' STAFF COMMENT: As indicated above, those Lots of Record which do not meet the minimum lot area and minimum lot dimensions may be used provided that all other requirements are met. The subject property does not meet the minimum lot area requirement or the minimum lot width and frontage; however, all other aspects of the requirements have been met. Additionally, the lot measures 50' wide and meets the additional limitation set forth on residential property widths. Therefore, the subject property may be developed without seeking relief. Given the above, positive findings can be made with respect to the subject LDR requirement. SECTION 4.5.1, HISTORIC PRESERVATION DISTRICTS AND SITES Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E) Development Standards, All new development or exterior improvements on individually designated historic properties and/or properties located within historic districts shall, comply with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and the Development Standards of this Section. Relief from Subsections (1) through (9) below may be granted by seeking a waiver approvable by the Historic Preservation Board, unless otherwise stated. 4.5.1(E)(2)(a), Major and Minor Development: The subject application is considered "Major Development", as it is new construction. STAFF COMMENT: The proposed new construction classifies the subject request as "Major Development" and is reviewed as such throughout the report. 4.5.1(E)(3)(a)1., Buildings, Structures, Appurtenances and Parking; Appurtenances, Fences and Walls: The provisions of Section 4.6.5 shall apply, except as modified below: a. Chain-link fences are discouraged. When permitted, chain-link fences shall be clad in a green or black vinyl and only used in rear yards where they are not visible from a public right of way, even when screened by a hedge or other landscaping. b. Swimming pool fences shall be designed in a manner that integrates the layout with the lot and structures without exhibiting a utilitarian or stand-alone appearance. c. Fences and walls over four feet (4') shall not be allowed in front or side street setbacks. 11 NE 7th Street.Del-Ida Park;COA 2013-029 HPB Meeting December 19. 2012 Page 5 of 8 d. Non-historic and/or synthetic materials are discouraged, particularly when visible from a public right of way. e. Decorative landscape features, including but not limited to, arbors, pergolas, and trellises shall not exceed a height of eight feet(8') within the front or side street setbacks. STAFF COMMENT: The proposal includes a 6' stucco wall extended from the front elevation to the side property line, and interrupted by a painted wood gate of the same height. The existing PVC fence, which will remain, is a fence type which is typically discouraged by the Board; however, it was approved by the Board, and its visibility will be limited as it is behind the proposed new development. The proposal is in compliance with the requirements of the subject Section and positive findings can be made. 4.5.1(E)(3)(a)1., Buildings, Structures, Appurtenances and Parking; Appurtenances, Garages and Carports: a. Garages and carports are encouraged to be oriented so that they may be accessed from the side or rear and out of view from a public right of way. b. The orientation of garages and carports shall be consistent with the historic development pattern of structures of a similar architectural style within the district. c. The enclosure of carports is discouraged. When permitted, the enclosure of the carport should maintain the original details, associated with the carport, such as decorative posts, columns, roof planes, and other features. d. Garage doors shall be designed to be compatible with the architectural style of the principal structure and should include individual openings for vehicles rather than two car expanses of doors. Metal two car garage doors are discouraged; however, if options are limited and metal is proposed, the doors must include additional architectural detailing appropriate to the building. STAFF COMMENT: The proposal includes a single-car garage on the front elevation which faces NE 7th Street. While orienting the garage for access out view from the public right of way would be nearly impossible on the subject property, it is set back from the foremost wall plane which strives to reduce its prominence within the design, thereby meeting the intent of the subject requirement. 4.5.1(E)(8) Visual Compatibility Standards: New construction and all improvements to both contributing and noncontributing buildings, structures and appurtenances thereto within a designated historic district or on an individually designated property shall be visually compatible. In addition to the Zoning District Regulations, the Historic Preservation Board shall apply the visual compatibility standards provided for in this Section with regard to height, width, mass, scale, facade, openings, rhythm, material, color, texture, roof shape, direction, and other criteria set forth elsewhere in Section 4.5.1. Visual compatibility for minor and major development as referenced in Section 4.5.1(E)(2) shall be determined by utilizing criteria contained in (a)-(m) below. Visual compatibility for all development on individually designated properties outside the district shall be determined by comparison to other structures within the site The following criteria apply: (a) Height: The height of proposed buildings or modifications shall be visually compatible in comparison or relation to the height of existing structures and buildings in a historic district for all major and minor development. For major development, visual compatibility with respect to the height of residential structures, as defined by 4.5.1(E)(2)(a), shall also be determined through application of the Building Height Plane. 11 NE 7th Street. De!-Id Perk:COA 2013-029 1FB Meeting December 19,2012 ^Ceuof8 (b)Front Facade Proportion: The front facade of each building or structure shall be visually compatible with and be in direct relationship to the width of the building and to the height of the front elevation of other existing structures and buildings within the subject historic district. (c) Proportion of Openings (Windows and Doors): The openings of any building within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the openings exemplified by prevailing historic architectural styles of similar buildings within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors to the height of windows and doors among buildings shall be visually compatible within the subject historic district. (d) Rhythm of Solids to Voids: The relationship of solids to voids of a building or structure shall be visually compatible with existing historic buildings or structures within the subject historic district for all development, with particular attention paid to the front facades. (e) Rhythm of Buildings on Streets: The relationship of buildings to open space between them and adjoining buildings shall be visually compatible with the relationship between existing historic buildings or structures within the subject historic district. (f) Rhythm of Entrance and/or Porch Projections: The relationship of entrances and porch projections to the sidewalks of a building shall be visually compatible with existing architectural styles of entrances and porch projections on existing historic buildings and structures within the subject historic district for all development. (g) Relationship of Materials, Texture, and Color: The relationship of materials, texture, and color of the facade of a building and/or hardscaping shall be visually compatible with the predominant materials used in the historic buildings and structures within the subject historic district. (h) Roof Shapes: The roof shape, including type and slope, of a building or structure shall be visually compatible with the roof shape of existing historic buildings or structures within the subject historic district. The roof shape shall be consistent with the architectural style of the building. (i) Walls of Continuity: Walls, fences, evergreen landscape masses, or building facades, shall form cohesive walls of enclosure along a street to ensure visual compatibility with historic buildings or structures within the subject historic district and the structure to which it is visually related. (j) Scale of a Building: The size of a building and the building mass in relation to open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, porches, and lot size shall be visually compatible with the building size and mass of historic buildings and structures within a historic district for all development. (k) Directional Expression of Front Elevation: A building shall be visually compatible with the buildings, structures, and sites within a historic district for all development with regard to its directional character, whether vertical or horizontal. (I) Architectural Style: All major and minor development shall consist of only one (1) architectural style per structure or property and not introduce elements definitive of another style. STAFF COMMENT/ANALYSIS: Overall, the proposal generally meets the aforenoted Visual Compatibility Standards given the restricted developable area on the small site. The entire structure is two-story, similar to the other two properties on the street that are of comparable size and also recently developed. The break in the front wall plane assists in alleviating the impact of the upper story which would have a greater, negative impact without the additional setback, both vertically and horizontally. The revised front elevation with the recessed windows on the first floor gives the appearance of a small covered porch area while providing a 11 NE 7th Street. Del-Ida Park:COA 2013-029 HPB Meeting December 19,2012 Page 7 of 8 second story balcony above. Encroachment into the Building Height Plane area remains with the revised plans; a waiver to permit the encroachment has been requested and is analyzed below. The provision of one exterior material (stucco), addition of shutters, decorative railing on the front elevation, and the shed roof overhang above the garage all give added interest to the new construction which strives to be compatible in the historic district. It appears the applicant made a concerted effort to incorporate the direction given by the Board and Staff during the previous review. As a result, positive findings can be made with respect to the subject Sections indicated above. WAIVER ANALYSIS Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the approving body shall make a finding that the granting of the waiver: (a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; (b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; (c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; and, (d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. STAFF COMMENT: The subject waiver request to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(a), Visual Compatibility Standards: Height is to provide relief to permit encroachment of the second story into the Building Height Plane area. The intent of the Section is to minimize the impact of upper stories on the streetscape. It is necessary to factor in the non-conforming lot width and area in comparison with the limited width of the encroaching area which measures 18'8". The width was established by setting back the wall plane containing the garage, as is required. Therefore, the subject encroachment came about as a means of balancing the design regulations a lot which does not meet the minimum development requirements for the zoning district within which it is located. In consideration of the criteria with the comments noted above, the request to encroach into the Building Height Plane is not deemed to adversely affect the neighboring area, in that other existing recent development on comparable, yet larger sized nonconforming lots would also encroach into this area, yet at an even greater width. Further, given the circumstances of the nonconforming lot of a similar size within the same zoning district, the same waiver would be supported. Based on the above, positive findings can be made. 11 NE 7th Street.Gel-Ida Park:GOA 2013-029 HPB Meeting December,9.2012 Page 8 of 8 ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness (2013-029) for 11 NE 7th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District, based on positive findings with respect to the Comprehensive Plan, Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation subject to conditions. C. Deny the Certificate of Appropriateness (2013-029) for 11 NE 7th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to the Comprehensive Plan, Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. (Motion to be phrased in the affirmative. See above.) RECOMMENDATION By Separate Motions: Certificate of Appropriateness Move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness (2013-029) for 11 NE 7th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District, based on positive findings with respect to the Comprehensive Plan and the Land Development Regulations, subject to the condition that the DSMG confirm the right of way reduction for NE 7th Avenue from 60' to 50'. : Waiver: LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(a), Visual Compatibility Standards: Height, Building Height Plane Approve the waiver to permit the second story encroachment into the Building Height Plane at a width of 18'8", as proposed, whereas no encroachment is permitted, based on positive findings with respect to Section 2.4.7(B)(5). Report Prepared by:Amy E. Alvarez, Historic Preservation Planner , 1 • N.E. 10TH ST. N.E. 9TH ST. L N.W. 8TH ST. GEORG BUSH BOULEVARD Q W G' . W QP Q > Fl Q N.E. 7TH ST. QO , till �CIIII 1- N.W. 7TH ST. OJ w J > Q TH ST. N.E. 6TH ST. MI pC.J . oQ.__J G 0 4._,,,4 Q , z4.4,,, ,..0 z N.E. 5TH TERR. o c ci NE z z � , N i14Y N.E. 5TH CT. H R STu cT �`'�- N 11 NE 7TH STREET _1101.1111"--- SUBJECT PROPERTY DEL IDA PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 0 V PLANNING AND ZONING tp,� ``' DEPARTMENT VARIANCE MAP -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: S:\Planning & Zoning\DBMS\File—Cab\Z—LM 1001-1500\LM1199_11 NE 7th Street • �3` 4,A A r am.t I" .,,, �y. i 1 '1 I1 P" 1 'r i. I ' N it Ito--; A 'K)'�5 � '1''' '' 61111111111 kl!llfil '11I111llllll v- .,t,:.. 1s r tto • �� I �: '� • I h 1 1 ° :f ' •` -r • i,11 • 4,fr Flo is :4 0, ; .,+-,3, 'i.".g 9 FRONT ELEVATION 1.1 N.E.7111 s'fRE r DELR\.Y BLACII,FL BY:\IARC.JUL[IiN HOMES SC.\I.E.IrI'-1'-0" G=.a.MC SCA= 12,03;2012 A F 'F I .N IT I. a.olx 'J a 3 'a ins% e:ulx . c mig.7:477011, (14 ..1 i0••1‘,F.E'-'-AA •k ,,,.:„.‘, , 50.001 ,.C1 AlLe, EL0',Si'. ;111a111: 1..4Y.Ft,2•L GT APE&1(:15 1150 SF, Kg ar11;:taf KO 7143 CIM1,71 r I? I I •.F,1=1.. %FAG .5•11'0,0 AG U-1k SF, 1.339 GP, CO 6 I rAzAce.1D0•1 0.7i,ENTPT•07 101 AL rinCQ 1..,TJ,f•01011.0 rq Sr, 0 SF. 2,754 GY. FOR.SEE AITIEGALAalraM'A 41 •1.4 i.d POOL lt?,gR Q 0 14 I ' cane 61-QUM, WI 0.:GT 4,'7.4. r'7,.a.171),07 001,121,7 th30.1,1`. MX IN`J•14_1E rco 71 G113141:',1 LAW SF. 1,.. ••••-t 4-J Er_, oft 0 rt) '- 0 ..:. ,..::'....1::..... .... :..:,::,': ,...t? rill 7.4 I PA.0 Ek.git C4 I t7-2,11:0 I I I ••-t gr ant3o ., ,. .. ..: - I i r•-o• POOL ma ac2 I I.,Cum Hei i 1 I Z 1•;;;;;::•,:;;;.......;:f.;,,,..:;%%:•?;•;;.;.,.::?:::::•;:.".::•;:.::: :: :::%.::•:::;;;::::::;,:::::;,;;:::::.•;:,,,:,;•,-,..: I PA I 6.4 I . 1 t .,:... ".17,e'.. I-I ed I ;;;...:,•;...;%,...;::::,.;-;,,;•::,,:::;,.:::.:-;.1-:;.:',:•2:;;4•::::.;:*;;:'.1:1%':•:,:,1%:'',.::*%•*:' ,,:....*ei.:••...;;:...,......:,4./4,...................!..:1.v..;...;,......,;...,;;;;•.•;:,..:../:,,,,.t.,...',. FP .fO. e—I kw/ I "..."',/:',.'.',.:,';:,':.;:l'?...:...;:'...t:;,.....f....;,,,,,.1%.1:;:......,;..%1::::•%:/...,:.:4.:.:, I I I 0.,44:VA I r4 1 r.2.:•:,.:Z.,,OP,',,,:.:.,;.:::•.:.•.:?.:.1.,.1.1;,,-;2:,;:.:•.:;,,;;I::;:11:,%•,%,.:)...::,%,%%•:,:•%% ! -,Witlig::TO 1 ;::1 I ',.',',",•,,4„,,,,,,•",,,,,•••••:.A,:,4,:%,,•;•,•:%:.;%:,/,:,..:,:,,;/,,;e : :,,,,,,,,,./.:....,,,,,.....:.;•:•,•?.•/:•••••/•1,••4V41••••••••;••••,•4•.•it•:••••:•:•:•,.., I I FrO,• X:Wfrk,41::;iirti? il 1 ,,,,,,,......,..-........„,......./.:..::•;.,:/......,,,,,;,:4,:::,:::,--,::::,,t;,...;,.,.:.,,,..........,. , ,.:..,......::?4,::::::::.....-1:,,,,,,...;,::,,.....,...,:,;,..;,,,...,:,:•5.1..,,,,o,::::,, I ,,,,,,01';',.''i ; ;:41r.v414,, 1 I ,,,,,,,,,,,,....-:,...4,..:-.,:::,:,,,,,5,,p,;,,i.. •',.,,,,:;,!;,...,.. L.Aglixolge r#0,-..o..vee&,;,r-I.- . • 1.....1'...:.:.::.;;;'%:::'.•.:';'?..;•::::1:4..:.:......:::;:::::.;1:::?,.%5,?tt.....5,e."..:;.;:',..4:, ....,4%,%.*'%'!...4 '""l'a 1 ; “ • ''.•A I %.....;%?;••••:•:,...;•;.•%;%.•:•.•:•:*:•••%541%:•?••:•.;,•:••:•%•.':•:::.;%!:.::•%.•::::'•,;';*:.•:::::::1:::•:::0•; -.;ii PPO, , I Vg.iiiqh•NOI‘Ifigithitti IT E.,0,,,I I :.1::•:::;:';(1,•:•:".;;?,:;";;;•: ; ;;% %:?.::::::::;;;;gi.:•:..V...:'.. .!te ....:..:::::.;.a•','% . 1 r-jvir"1‘.1 I, 1 ••••••••••• ' ' I I ,2V.VOit'Alg4'114fel;. ,..40;.4.104,t1'° ir P",•,47,‘,14-19.e.4.,4,.wm Ito' , :.'.5,,.„'s j;e I ;•;:':.1;:i:'1;Rifi_.44,4-,...;1,-P i•;:.;. .., ..,s.,, y,... .,.. , ,,... „:........„„,•• a„,1 D-a..,,,,a,.,:f.:1,;:".,;.:..:::::...,..s.:,..,...vp 1.:.../-:,/,....:?4 ....1.P. I I 1 1,7-7:4,-.rao ;,.....':• :;.,:3.:•1?'• .,R, ... •.;;;g;. 0;;;; .:;.' . ; .-.:;?... C-3-11IM Ygn I ' ' ' ild I -1111.411.3: ;:•.-Z.:',• •••1Et.W.ile.4001.41..1:•1::•1:::•%;:•4:•4:'4:, '•:..;':•,'.;:•,1,. TBACK I , hie-, ,.•• ,yrr:4•13W44, , 4- e:::.::;,•-:;,-.;-::.::.:..--..,.f5>::i::.::S::;;,'5;.;:;...;;:;;;;;;.7 , to,11:47*4q16."' , *d4,.$ill,"110 . : .%,,:::,,:5:::,;,:;,::::,:.v::::,.::,,,,:.,;:::%;,...,;•%.;41.;•:•:.::,:,:i,,..:::•%.:%;7......;,...;,....n, , g'440;',9441:iri*a gifrApagg;A ' • . 'ir • " ' VI' IMO,;%•,:••,.,•,...•4•.••;•1•:•••,,,,,••..,,,,•,.... s••' mp ,,4 , 1 , •:154 ,vgira,044,11.4.-=..... ..oz,:43 , .' /. ...., 4 ..I I I :„.,,, ..w.,,,AA5„.,.,:,..-:,,,.....:::,-.::::::::: :::‹•,%:.;: ,.....;,:,,,,,.... ...-.::-.0.4,,1.e, .:.:1.4"1... :',,ii 0,,,It. .::,..',. 4.,,,,i• ,•, •......,:! g .,,,,,,,,,,...„.:.•.„,:•.:•.,,,,..,:,:•.:,,,,,,,,,:,;;,:, ..... .• , ,:„..,.......;;„•.,.„:,,,.,.....„..„.:,,./..„„,..„.•,,..„..„,..,,,,,..,.„.....,:.,„..., , , , , , ., ...• ..-..overipi, ,.„._., Ak •bp , . ••-•,.......,,,,,..,,..•,,,,,•••%:',:•••:',..•••""l',":"."//6",;•'.,A.,,,,%•,•••• ,r,411 I , .., ,„ ,.,. 8- 1 ., .,,,,...:,.....„..,..........,'I,.41,'It': •:,:.••••••`•.'• ..:,..•:",.:,,,,,, • , 5 , • Wm..a c*o ,,..,..,t4.414,4. 1,,,, i ii .-..........,g,,N,R.,..w _ 1 I ,..,-,—, ::.- ...k.y....., • ig • 81 , ,, . . le,,•.:44•,::::•./.•.:;.•:•.•:•./....,,,,:•,•:•,.:•:••:•.*:,:•.:1'.:•:".,:i.•:',,•::f•:,r4:.(4;..f.,::r...::::.• I ",:e/..:•:;i4.::::::•%:2••••if':•i:',,e,,Z,4",.......,:;%•:;'''•"''''.'•'''''''••••••''' tle I I I I I 1 . .____ I ri t: ; ;, ..7 '..,..'' 7 Ashburn 1-......„..) .__1 1 1 I I moat 1 ( ,.... 0—PAM t 1 WALKWAY 1 — War 5040. I k-ii --- e; I- .. I IT FX CCtETZJ:T Ali k.._ I Ilki., 12,941 Nim.10.33.1 =CAW ro.dow 110.00.1.giwal . -- N.E.71}{SITMET _ — _ 116111411.79 ... i I 1 PAVER / DRIVEWVAY _-_______+____ _4 AA0002}40 C3012 g151"3 50.0(Y 5 00 I,11'•40 —- — ----- ed _ 5.4 rq w f ii 1 .ate.Hi�r..i>, FQ3 iii�' U x a� � 3 5 - W PI r e — -- _ CI P „ II�M �© J 1 '�.tM tv.. Q3 ■1■ —— 111 — — --U ' -- — r -R E _ i , *tom `. FRONT ELEVATION I X � El ' ~ �v-`�i u j •iMi JJL III IEa 1 y I NOT F-D2 CCSL TZ CTI:.N NY 24.11 t r °"!MOW Din ITrot Diu 10min a* - M54.1, RIG-IT SIDE ELEVATION AAOCOITAO'g"mC ELEVATIONS A5.'( - b U I-1 r3 - '"'•COD w u : : ❑ ..Cso - ° M -- -' I�� 1:::: . I I II -- 4rr� Ulu z � U rt � ft ,..( ci) A kw REAR ELEVATION , __-- ...,...,,,,i..,,,:....i.,..'i:.;,i :-: �s Si Y t _ _ _ rrc. ff... �, — WT F02 C0ETP-CTI]N L►ww10 513414G 0442 Odr I!{p,..1 sar Da 1Q316.Qe. - LEFT SIDE ELEVATION E EVA11O1•s ' -:. 10TN,AC NF• 1.495 SF '1;:R 7:.(u Z.SP. arr�n rtll. u SF. al NA "1Z1 tA:.ca,uL:usn Zt�ar°, •,_. U 1C VW d1.141.,41.11 w ^ - y{ (j Y+i • �� --i Tom:? i I 14 N 7-4 x r--4 1 ......... A 0 t , ..Guru. 1 0 , II Eli 1-06 I iism ii,--. 1Fi — i :,.,•,• ,•.,, 44 E , Zit =� 9 7 1 Z. II II ��II i1i ~' y II II I• : •xeT r r Q tiu IyPQ4, l OA r -R 1 1 N Hi ( I �� LI QC. SMOG. Y14 " ti 9 1I ; sii �. C l �_--= a. _ . 1 r NOT r uZ CCCbT CTICt1 . aa -- D.r �s Dural Clad m4fhn ,I 1..r ea. MIT„IV,tf H N11'TJ. l'M"H 1'i' H Da I?End .. o-r (( r iv DON I611rIP lko - w,'YID..a�..YU S1 M0002)40 g2,2312 • EiRST FI OOR PUN .A3.O iiLL:423Z3 ;, .0 b U 63 I~ a n-..2.,.."„ w o a .r } e. M r w PXI V 0 4- t, ro b X0_,_)--, . 11.1 ‘.3 DI GI i T a'h,s rt.& , , ,,,A,.,4,, • y/J•••H Vrft , [I ''' r 11 {, Irlkci R .1. I 11 11 v' 7 1 :J1oL L i 11 1 L. J_ '. _ IDI F-X CfISRETEIN Or VA-2 0a Ipm{W .r . .vk H. ivr .r r. Yr ltrt - K 'v O.r IC.r.Ona - > MOOOAIO C20E SECOND FLOOR PLAN A3 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT Applicant: Rectory Park, LLC Authorized Agent: GE Architecture, Inc. Property Address: 40 South Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District HPB Meeting Date: December 19, 2012 File No.: 2013-059 ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is the consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) for a roof material change on the structure located at 40 South Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H). BACKGROUND & PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject property consists Lot 15, Block 61, Town of Delray within OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District) zoning district. Located within the Old School Square Historic District, the property is located on the west side of South Swinton Avenue, approximately 120 feet north of SW 1st Street. A modest, circa 1925, Bungalow style residence exists on the property and is contributing to the historic district. At its meeting of September 19, 2001, the Board reviewed a COA (COA-484) for the change in roof material from asphalt to standing seam copper, color changes, and replacement of columns on the porch. The roof material change and column alterations were approved. However, the approved improvements did not take place, and the approval expired. In 2012, a COA was administratively approved for the replacement of all windows within the structure. There are no other COAs on file which pertain to this property. The request is for the removal of an asphalt shingle roof and installation of a pre-weathered galvanized (grey), standing seam metal roof. Roof replacement is typically approved administratively when the same material is proposed, and, when deemed appropriate by Staff, when a new material is proposed. However, due to the nature of the proposal, Staff is deferring the decision to the Board, via recommendation. The COA is now before the Board for consideration. ANALYSIS Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(D), Development Review and Approval Procedures, pursuant to Section 2.4.6(H), approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) must be 1 40 South Swinton Avenue; COA 2013-059 HPB Meeting of December 19,2012 Page 2 of obtained from the Historic Preservation Board prior to the exterior improvement of any property, building, or structure located within a Historic District or Individually Designated Site, as listed on the Local Register of Historic Places in Section 4.5.1(1), The COA process may occur concurrently with the processing of any additional reviews required for any such improvement of development. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E), Development Standards, all new development or exterior improvements on individually designated historic properties and/or properties located within historic districts shall, comply with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and the Development Standards of this Section. Relief from Subsections (1) through (9) below may be granted by seeking a waiver approvable by the Historic Preservation Board, unless otherwise stated. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(2)(c), Minor Development, the subject application is considered "Minor Development" as it is less than 25% of the existing building's floor area. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), Alterations, in considering proposals for alterations to the exterior of historic buildings and structures and in applying development and preservation standards, the documented, original design of the building may be considered, among other factors. STAFF COMMENT: As indicated above, the proposal is classified as "Minor Development" and has been reviewed accordingly in the sections below. Additionally, the design and details of the original structure have been considered for the roof material change, as indicated further in this report. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(5), Standards and Guidelines, a historic site, building, structure, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall only be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and the Delray Beach Historic Presentation Design Guidelines, as amended from time to time. The applicable Standards are noted below: • The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. (Standard 2) • New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. (Standard 9) • New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. (Standard 10) Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8), Visual Compatibility Standards, new construction and all improvements to both contributing and noncontributing buildings, structures and appurtenances thereto within a designated historic district or on an individually designated property shall be visually compatible. In addition to the Zoning District Regulations, the Historic Preservation Board shall apply the visual compatibility standards provided for in this Section t 40 Soutn Swinton Avenue:COA 2013-059 HPB Meehiin of Decemcei'9,2012 Page 3 of 3 with regard to height, width, mass, scale, façade, openings, rhythm, material, color, texture, roof shape, direction, and other criteria set forth elsewhere in Section 4.5.1. Visual compatibility for minor and major development as referenced in Section 4.5.1(E)(2) shall be determined by utilizing criteria contained in (a)-(m) below. Visual compatibility for all development on individually designated properties outside the district shall be determined by comparison to other structures within the site (g) Relationship of Materials, Texture, and Color: The relationship of materials, texture, and color of the facade of a building and/or hardscaping shall be visually compatible with the predominant materials used in the historic buildings and structures within the subject historic district. STAFF ANALYSIS: The proposal to install a standing seam metal roof is neither appropriate for nor compatible with the subject modest bungalow style structure. An appropriate type of roof material and style would be a dimensional shingle, either slate, asphalt, cedar shake, or even a decorative metal shingle, as opposed to the type which is proposed. It should be noted that the previous type of roof material change that was approved by the Board in 2001 was for a copper roof, not grey metal. Based on the above, positive findings cannot be made for the proposed roof material change with respect to the LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8), Visual Compatibility Standards. However, a material change could be support if appropriately proposed, in a style indicated above. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness (2013-059) for 40 South Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, based on positive findings with respect to the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation subject to conditions. C. Deny the Certificate of Appropriateness (2013-059) for 40 South Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. (Motion to be phrased in the affirmative. See above.) RECOMMENDATION Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness (2013-059) for a roof replacement on the structure located at 40 South Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, based on positive findings with respect to the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the condition that the material be of a material other than standing seam metal, as determined to be appropriate by the Board. Report Prepared by:Amy E. Alvarez, Historic Preservation Planner • • 4 '� :11�'fq. .•Al� •�,f y.x di 11,ft'� `.f r�. '-�.�. 141 -Y 141 4g; ?• '444 `'4.00:i' l =ram rf, f' 1 ; \ :! .•-..q` �" ''s , '^nµ : r�r.', ..`` r i.' Y. ` •!t. ♦,,•`'$ _: .•'.. _ .. F N�♦ -- Ge�� ' a' "7 �a : ....Y'. :'. � 7 •- ia mw - ' ''/ q�� r. p r ' ti♦ . y /..is -.n fi^ "" l .2 • �, :.r- OP "t ., q '10, ' n4-0,I r%f;w • 0 I � - / j.-1 . � yi " Yy 7�� , ILl y d I14 : q . W I `4 \ a .; • i ...0.. - :.A r „ w«. ,"r 4' la I .i. , L . ,wJ1X n d � ..z:L.":''' li „,,,,,,..,..„,,,,„---,, "lc,ri' , : '4'4 ' ''' ':'!: C.:1*' 111, lit' Z L h - _ - cf*• "' yI� 1.w ,k �. -= J�_.,jw F 4d�9ENIP'} Gdk1r ��fi��Pl�lloltl��1y. �' y, Idal � w H ' n ti .. ' ',,;1 rt.' �Ti `i L 1,1M1� 1 Ili 1r 5 4 ' " dr ' C"� `" � -L..�C'ur✓ �°i e :gm qll' p . ,, rc I ' . _I 14 1 ,', I ;'" r / t��NA iII�d'1Id ugFit1 l 1 I I it i,,: l Yir' M�1'll r• "" -r .'n` • I,.. k 9,u ar,! uYC"..It I .,w I� �iw t. t `..�.• • t }C �, xt..i•• 'I""�,,,,*''F w!',j u tivt: ,, 'i.ilt r { ry',t y� • ,I.: �1 iti•rr.,+ Attie dt,i P'. ihr„,, $,u �'%'4, . 'io .'? �':* 7 0 '0,. .rI,`.., « ` 11'' ,Alt ,i, I.W9r R Y br. C , I • i +T , r�,�'., W, '!N+w. • 4Y - -, a �.^./ Y�yy•'r Llt.•.i rr'\-, a ''%..jb..,4, M W."'•mitt M1'",+ R j ei1"Ij,ll. Mw , '' My',»Ρ , A y•',`d e5'''4 '' .;,'I'a'Y r'i. 1;-.;"ff I. ' ,. . , w`x� : ,,I,' 1'?';i4i C'. �� . ;! 'yp'l. v.n p ),„ ,,t kr1:!n;C `,,,',alt` 1TI,. 1y + 3!. \ e 1 ,. a '„, ....y�.,. w, aJ�* ,,,.i., ry.. 2,.' >�' �,- '-.�,"Rd` ��r:,. !� M�.- e� /'��w•l „�. �Ir4�i �\T�I�? Iy •ql�'�,b- "",, '9 ,� G \'W. , fr sz 4.t o,1 ;a r'M p rr ,.,1, < ,v. N '� � I,u�l �� r7. .+A �,'. r 'r ;X f r+- .\ e '! � \D ti'."d�`ri s,, $„ :I'. ,ut i I ., 4 y i�4 I rq5"rk„ M. .3' e'' ;y. r+a"134�' ��'[�, x I „w�•, - � �„ jr.�, � .,-Fay 4 � .•}GI p;tic i r � ,�'k '� Y,. :•ry� � q' �m'I�e �I�, .,t`' n 1:ya R; a - , .: i .rrar " d.«} •.y..N I% ,�, titt � e . fi.� :'�, llI��e,r, .;.} .�, I �.^, ��,K i�. :v.r,�. u� �G .,,+4, u +,,...�( Ir, ,+. 4Ra- r 7A k i , ,' w <,r `.1.G,�.': 8p: I,' :p. , ."1 rN. ""4. I1 � :,�. ` *y i,�, "4r. .\ �r+ :S u:a '"f ! 4�.. ..fi :PPpc,r.w Mk'l.'7,.). + .J1�,,t, ,{ ,. a �.I ' ;F ',„.1% y l '�:" orNtIr a.t .:. ;, r, i � ', ...A%. .e �" .,,- ��. �*�:"• �: a ht i�%u W G �� , �"r .:..:1. .,""'• ;,.. �` �„•r.} � .. ,,�� 'x .,,iya.•� 1 „� ��knfi`bs'�1" .h�,"yr`d , r �i , ,., I� ,�, ,� I »I�I"" �,�h �'r9 . . � �,'; 1i:'.: , .r'� r , ki r, !' ;•. ! 0.;, ,x,:, rn r {u'..'rr ''' :," fxi"�i,,, ',,. .. • r , . � �rn l'.. ,. .,, ,. � i•'.� ..y-.,f��C kaia� . he.rrar t.. r yn��;:: �.�Jw� 1� 'r6aM1�'d � ,�I��#t �.: , '�7P'`4�� 111,144,4"I� Ju}`:�aa;,,:,- ww i;��', t y• �' {` r•.•"y .x `•,i �-n.t�,,,,tr "..r al: C;w�, fhv}h �oM: h!? ' t, h+,l"'2..�": °... x. ,�. +�ly, y,.rly... r. i. a",; 5,', ) „yy n F,4.4 .v,.,,�,„.t"L1. ,'(?�;- t iFU Ply `, ).).'!. 1 fr ,',,, Y'� r.h. 'y'/ : "� l ' '0 , ♦ r,-.- i 4. .J4 ,, 1.., ,,1 SW'aK ,. ':. , v, . d � ..:, � ,�,�:t,�'?a ,.°x � fi ;, ,.-"S. •CSw. '.� I f �•�+ '"%M','p.'',r"Y1� a, } ;� y "�'^ `':s,.:' n;...1;Y , .^+.. a } ; w .: ,I.,, .4 e r r , , , ,,,t TM ka V4 +.U.,. r .t. _� ate,, � r - ., ^. w .f, rr �'.d�,_.�` t•� .. ,:� .:w .hjl Y�"'7t t .v�":'d;"ro .'�,9 �!, 1.4., .y.: �i��t�� ..x ry:' "i. „ .�. ,.a k.r-j i..},1 *:¢' :i, ,,,.+ .%, r•' '' ,M r _ p,. \ :.r r=•�t �,-0,- - . ,,, 't' , • ,.•,� '•.�?'„y x, v /.1)-..�T.t .,, a: •4 r •,'''. .1,'.- 4,,, •J 'f. .,°'•i. ��', ';Ir::,...''`• .i' f 1 �.r,."r "147 'u. A ,•. a. ..r.1, `...:" rrr 7cd '"''�,^�: L. .�• +• ':• • d';s':M? 4;y� -44, ,A-L4 it aL• `/• '•''''1,r. ''.' r: ,,.s .T. L-:-2,L: lNxa.n 'k j,,.,r 7'...-' . .-. 3 :,•�;' 'Ai.- '.•4...1'`tip:`•d.i..+t4,. -t .ea! ..,. '�e'p•L'.� x•4,ITT7 44ai . : i1' ,44 «"r + "C'�•,.•` L:, •F,: \ :+ w J. r d. .,1 -,:-4.4 ,� .� r g f ..,- ' r 'e, ),. ,F"1i `�'{', 9w ,,+ '` ' ,• 1•\ ▪ --,:.,•:t, } r �i,r''+ y. � +:>` mar. i rrfr- I + ' K.3 t'w' :+. k i, ri' ..•••�`:. {. �• 4. .Gr .1• tJ 114 ',f a;!' �Yi�i' ,. -• * }7l.'vcj 'T ^-y'ad.A h r S., :u�. .�-, r �" • *•i.�Nt�'" ^1,,. �f� �,r �'' 't�� •te. $> ,>�-•Y .;\ +e; p-a-,: 1 � �.Nq?.kr • ,e: , 'K .. Y '�j.� ,r"` , a,, ...#�' ,,f(�� y �' a,�•;►` ..i,�•yt^ ,,:� �'�,<9,ryq'„fleet t�i .....• • -:..._.:#e'?,.. .nit ,.>''. s ,r .:+c: '�� -•-'r . :t. !. ,, ,`h ! r d r: to 4,W n ,�` •'4•a.' '..;t:,,.7, . ,'„: L, - *. ,,,. .>:a.s,-.�, -:ti :a 'a '}• iJ :r' I'C' ,,a d,�xrb t V,� I I' { ;'• „ryW,?♦; k4t Ar•-a� ,. '.�.' . `• \{:q '. ,.- y,-:n i{(,y.�a 'i1( (• 1,,.., t} ,n '"' 'c., e /a• •r a "•rt'r. _ �i:I' 'yy '}-,f� ,• a r•. �xri a +'/ '�i' 1'hf a '�1 `,,ii-:1-:-1, t .',•0 4,.., , '-,�yigr'f�y,,, ' „e,4 '' a. 1'••: 'i':>y\w ^!{r: ,,t .,s;•:"" , "1 4 ry , .t :.}r !, vn ,,1L .+S;C'� _ h . °' ¢H}yy::',r+ ;'�a ' t,i:- Y ,Y�l q.., ��f _ . -.r•` c. r�,:-. P �4-,,,-- ax�� J,+� ,i 1.a)% ,,t ii?t q-•' , ,r .1yr.• -' i. t,, -i' s �.' a 4.444 , '4..yt,i,.�'u�? 4, . rf. �.V /": ,rL C I"1 T �,,1,r! ,•' •,- �wlYya. , ,, - .41 r ".} t '.. yA T'' j , � 14.,," ,�.'-'1•°c� �V,, IJ'�r .rF{!1'1!4,,-r 1.+ Vu r,�.�'�V. r�,.4,,, ti(: •'.,l_, V� °j.,Y T,_r .4:4•' r, 'r"' S:4i. ...ik "i, "f y • u •h '., �:• f,., `4., . ,•a h� :ra ", ,}�. ,� J ,,.: _ `• i... .•::`.1- - ,•e'a. ;,} *'• ..X+4,t« .P',..,r •.• 1 f• f, y�.i, $: a`'' �Y*G! bl ` ?!:', `� -n, a n _tr, �,4� ..y y" � +,`.-..-.rr d i•,{• ._,y.rf„' :.T^»t „0„,„„o.,..-•'R,. St� 1"�':. , "V :• 1 x' r. h, y'1 1,:, „ :tom,r '{ „ ','�.,• "s ",,, �;,;•llA `.d"': `x ''•e,.'ice.. �19.r',,„,7,. z�`air.�i'a','1.4,,,t,! ^l�. ,',, ,,, . °J,, 1 �'t. A. ,. -� .:i,t Y::n. i,.•,.,. S '.... y t,!ac .' +� a• ,{ ; rz .' ,. , . 'i :' +tr ...d fr i J 1 \1 ^ iI y%.i "MLA 1 • r31 ,1' t r ' yr • :a.• r. ,, b 'kk%- .r ; ,f. 0{ f•;�!c. 1q• '7i1' Frl t�' 't l jv , _c' A(�yw 'yk ._",+�' ti•s',, w 1 h�Ys.tG r ,'.:r, 1 ',� i M•` ,i, { .1:' ••,l l 1, ;Y - f �.. .;, ,,.,."� •...t"- �' "�",••W ^ c a•. -••• • rj Y `'''� ,,4, ,li }4.. `'tvL4 « . 0 d.�.it...i!r,'°L,19`i •"� ter► 4.1Yd:, . .r { .• ?y ., i \ �r'b"ti �;. `, ,is'• .C7 f^^ rFu 1' ' ,,'";0✓�a!!_�L. _�. ryt�' 'f+y... f Li .di4,{'l�,�(;,•i �'. :fr +,. 1,>� nl y• `,a: .r`ir 'S 8t •.,. rr.� x. ; ...�" \ Y.y[, i ...'•� ,'rit.111 ' , AA�44.4.4L ,,,,, 1' '� i.,,,�,,+ ,- ?et+_ e.. . r. x .'�'`--�.,. r �, .,•• ,,,,, , ',�4. e •.. ,!•. _ �, �� v �,•�A. +�G ai..ri „r 3',i�v��;: •,..},. ,-11-4 '•, y/}T"'f.,,,},' ;\.,.. -_, .?3.,,fi !�.- y. ,r ,5.r-:_ !.,,, ' r,. •� .r :-T. .jy``,‘K, .. , ,/ qy. ,.ter ♦. k'y�j �k 1 " _ '�` ` '':r " f 'e •V '^ f1l9, 4e {sa4y 4.,V:•w�.,i ti. f'.�} '•'I.- ✓;. rl•• r w�.'ti� 1 � �t'>&f• j•A.' « a 1'�i•y - r:4 1.. .•r," « f l .1 '�:.1''% f•- -. -ram.- "1�. s.,y I- . e, HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT Applicant: John and Catherine Murphy Property Address: 220 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District HPB Meeting Date: December 19, 2012 File No.: 2013-058 ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is the consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) associated with an addition to a contributing structure, addition to a non-contributing structure, and an associated variance on the property located at 220 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H). BACKGROUND & PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject property consists of the Southerly 25 feet of Lot 11, and Lot 12, Block 10, Del-Ida Park Subdivision. Located within the Del-Ida Park Historic District, the subject property is zoned RO (Residential Office). A circa 1947 one-story, ranch-style single-family residence and a guest cottage constructed in 2010 exist on the property, which is located on the south side of Dixie Boulevard between NE 2nd and 3rd Avenues. In 2009, a COA was administratively approved for the reconstruction of the front deck, and installation of impact-resistant windows replicating the window type and configuration of the original windows. At its meeting of August 19, 2009, the HPB approved a COA (2009-220) for the construction of a one-story addition to the rear (south) and side (west) elevations to accommodate storage, kitchen expansion, family room, and master suite, as well as a detached 519 square foot one- story guest cottage. The approved improvements were constructed and the Board granted a Historic Ad Valorem Tax Exemption to the property in 2011. Upon review of the 2009 COA, it was determined by the DSMG that while the required right of way for Dixie Boulevard is 60', the existing width of 50' was acceptable. Therefore, the additional right of way was waived and no dedication along Dixie Boulevard was required. The subject request is for the addition of a 476 square foot addition to the rear of the principal structure on the west side which will connect the residence to the guest cottage. The guest cottage will remain independent from the residence as there will be no internal connection provided from the addition. A small closet addition on the west side is also proposed to the guest cottage. All details, materials, roof pitch and type, colors, etc. of the residence and guest cottage are being utilized in the new construction. A variance to the side (west) yard setback on the also been proposed in order to accommodate the additions. The required setback is 7'6", while the proposed setback is 5'. 221 Dixie Boulevard:COA 2013-058 HPR Meeting of December 19,2012 ,'=;_le 2 of 6 The COA and variance request are now before the Board for consideration. ANALYSIS Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), Development Standards, properties located within the RO zoning district shall be developed according to the requirements noted in the chart below. I Maximum i Existing Proposed II Allowed Side Interior Setback (West) I 7 '/2' 7 'A' 5' Lot Coverage j 40% 29% 35% STAFF COMMENT: The proposed additions are located 5' from the property line, as opposed to the required 7'6". Therefore, a variance has been requested. In addition, it is noted that while the lot coverage has increased, it remains compliant with the maximum permitted of 40%, whereas 35% is proposed. Positive findings can be made to this section subject to approval of the variance request. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(D), Development Review and Approval Procedures, pursuant to Section 2.4.6(H), approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) must be obtained from the Historic Preservation Board prior to the exterior improvement of any property, building, or structure located within a Historic District or Individually Designated Site, as listed on the Local Register of Historic Places in Section 4.5.1(l), The COA process may occur concurrently with the processing of any additional reviews required for any such improvement of development. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E), Development Standards, all new development or exterior improvements on individually designated historic properties and/or properties located within historic districts shall, comply with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and the Development Standards of this Section. Relief from Subsections (1) through (9) below may be granted by seeking a waiver approvable by the Historic Preservation Board, unless otherwise stated. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(2)(c), Minor Development, the subject application is considered "Minor Development" as it is less than 25% of the existing building's floor area. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), Alterations, in considering proposals for alterations to the exterior of historic buildings and structures and in applying development and preservation standards, the documented, original design of the building may be considered, among other factors. STAFF COMMENT: As indicated above, the proposal is classified as "Minor Development" and has been reviewed accordingly in the sections below. Additionally, the design and details of the original structure have been considered for the addition and provided in an appropriate manner, as indicated further in this report. 220 Dixie Boulevard:COA 2013-059 HPB Meeting of December 19.2012 Pace3of6 Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(5), Standards and Guidelines, a historic site, building, structure, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall only be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, as amended from time to time. The applicable Standards are noted below: • The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. (Standard 2) • New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. (Standard 9) • New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. (Standard 10) STAFF COMMENT: The proposed addition is in keeping with the scale and mass of the existing structure in addition to its roof type, pitch, and materials. The change in wall plane along the west elevation provides a slight and subtle differentiation between the original structure and the new addition, as is encouraged. Removal of the subject addition will not destroy the property if removed in the future, nor will it negatively impact the historic integrity. Positive findings can be made with respect to the subject LDR requirement. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8), Visual Compatibility Standards, new construction and all improvements to both contributing and noncontributing buildings, structures and appurtenances thereto within a designated historic district or on an individually designated property shall be visually compatible. In addition to the Zoning District Regulations, the Historic Preservation Board shall apply the visual compatibility standards provided for in this Section with regard to height, width, mass, scale, façade, openings, rhythm, material, color, texture, roof shape, direction, and other criteria set forth elsewhere in Section 4.5.1. Visual compatibility for minor and major development as referenced in Section 4.5.1(E)(2) shall be determined by utilizing criteria contained in (a)-(m) below. Visual compatibility for all development on individually designated properties outside the district shall be determined by comparison to other structures within the site (a) Height: The height of proposed buildings or modifications shall be visually compatible in comparison or relation to the height of existing structures and buildings in a historic district for all major and minor development. (c) Proportion of Openings (Windows and Doors): The openings of any building within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the openings exemplified by prevailing historic architectural styles of similar buildings within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors to the height of windows and doors among buildings shall be visually compatible within the subject historic district. (g) Relationship of Materials, Texture, and Color: The relationship of materials, texture, and color of the facade of a building and/or hardscaping shall be visually compatible with the predominant materials used in the historic buildings and structures within the subject historic district. (h) Roof Shapes: The roof shape, including type and slope, of a building or structure shall be visually compatible with the roof shape of existing historic buildings or structures within the 220 Dirge 6^t,i,>,,at 0Oa 2013-058 !PB A%ie:ei,,;c of D cember i ci.2012 'AQ 4 of 6 subject historic district. The roof shape shall be consistent with the architectural style of the building. (j) Scale of a Building: The size of a building and the building mass in relation to open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, porches, and lot size shall be visually compatible with the building size and mass of historic buildings and structures within a historic district for all development. (I) Architectural Style: All major and minor development shall consist of only one (1) architectural style per structure or property and not introduce elements definitive of another style. (m)Additions to Individually Designated Properties and Contributing Structures in all Historic Districts. Visual compatibility shall be accomplished as follows: 1. Additions shall be located to the rear or least public side of a building and be as inconspicuous as possible. 2. Additions or accessory structures shall not be located in front of the established front wall plane of a historic building. 3. Characteristic features of the original building shall not be destroyed or obscured. 4. Additions shall be designed and constructed so that the basic form and character of the historic building will remain intact if the addition is ever removed. 5. Additions shall not introduce a new architectural style, mimic too closely the style of the existing building nor replicate the original design, but shall be coherent in design with the existing building. 6. Additions shall be secondary and subordinate to the main mass of the historic building and shall not overwhelm the original building. STAFF ANALYSIS: The proposal respects the overall characteristic of the existing structure as it is utilizing similar features and materials while respecting the low-scale massing on the property. An in-depth analysis is not necessary with respect to the Visual Compatibility Standards, as there are no significant issues, and the proposal is in compliance with the ultimate intent of those Standards. Further, the additions are to the rear and side and will be inconspicuous as they are secondary and subordinate to the historic structure. Based on the above, positive findings can be made with respect to the LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8), Visual Compatibility Standards. VARIANCE ANALYSIS Section 2.4.7(A)(6), Variances: Alternative Findings of the Historic Preservation Board: The Board may be guided by the following to make findings as an alternative to the criteria listed in Section 2.4.7(A)(5): (a) That a variance is necessary to maintain the historic character of property and demonstrating that the granting of the variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare. (b) That special conditions and circumstances exist, because of the historic setting, location, nature, or character of the land, structure, appurtenance, sign, or building involved, which are not applicable to other lands, structures, appurtenances, signs, or buildings in the same zoning district, which have not been designated as historic sites or a historic district nor listed on the Local Register of Historic Places. (c) That literal interpretation of the provisions of existing ordinances would alter the historic character of the historic district, or historic site to such an extent that it would not be feasible to preserve the historic character of the historic district or historic site. • 220 Dixie Boulevard;COA 2013-058 HPB Meetino of December 19.2012 Page 5 of 6 (d) That the variance requested will not significantly diminish the historic character of a historic site or of a historic district. (e) That the requested variance is necessary to accommodate an appropriate adaptive reuse of a historic building, structure, or site: Variance: Side Yard Setback Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), Development Standards, Side Yard Setbacks in RO Zoning District, the minimum side yard setback for interior properties is 7'6". STAFF ANALYSIS As previously indicated, the proposed additions are situated 5' from the west property line, whereas the minimum setback requirement is 7'6". Therefore, the variance has been requested. In consideration of the criteria of Section 2.4.7(A)(6) above, the variance is not deemed to be contrary to the public interest in that the decreased setback, while closer to the adjacent property, maintains a similar separation from the property line which is also estimated at 5'. Further, the low scale and massing of the addition is not deemed to impact the neighboring property. Special conditions and circumstances exist, as the historic property is required to comply with the aforenoted requirements which suggest a differentiation between the new construction and the historic structure. This has been achieved by the 2'6" offset. While the offset could be interior to the property, the makeup of the interior spaces within the historic structure does not lend itself to inset the addition, as natural light would be significantly reduced along the rear elevation. The encroachment into the side yard setback is only applicable to the proposed additions which measure 22' and 9' in length, as opposed to the entire length of the property. Literal interpretation would suggest setting the addition into the property which would have more potential of creating a single long wall plane along the west elevation, whereas a break in wall plane is more desirable. Given the above, Staff recommends approval on the variance request as positive findings can be made pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(A)(6). Note: As required by the LDRs, a notice regarding the subject variance request was sent to those property owners located within a 500' radius of the subject property. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness (2013-058) for 220 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District, based on positive findings with respect to the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation subject to conditions. C. Deny the Certificate of Appropriateness (2013-058) for 220 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. (Motion to be phrased in the affirmative. See above.) 220 Dixie Boulevard: COA 2013-058 HPS Meeting of December 19,2012 Page 6 of 6 RECOMMENDATION By Separate Motions: Certificate of Appropriateness Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness (2013-058) for 220 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District, based on positive findings with respect to the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Variance: Side (West) Interior Setback LDR Section 4.3.4(K), Side Yard Setback, RO Zoning District Approve the Variance Request (2013-058) to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in LDR Section 2.4.7(A)(5), to reduce the side yard setback along the west property line to 5', whereas 7'6" is required, in association with the proposed additions. Report Prepared by:Amy E. Alvarez, Historic Preservation Planner Ii ' L. GEORGE BUSH BOULEVARD W VA Gam' -> QP\' Q N.E. 7TH ST. QO 411L,j ii, o > , _ a‹, J ,, N.E. 6TH ST. z- - p c>. \, (7 % c,- - 0-k'4 D I 0 J Cn Nill .E. 5TH TERR. Cr ,... 0 1') - , N - /O 0�+� N.E. 5TH CT. _ ikw(l _ I c z N.E. 5TH ST. cr (.5 1Lj Li (�W tt• D Z) N.E. 4TH ST. ]_ I- 1 E-1 r- 1 1--I r—, — `` r� - NIN SUBJECT PROPERTY 220 DIXIE BOULEVARD gin = VARIANCE gyp` �, PLANDEPARTMEN TNING LOCATION MAP �r 6 -- DIGITAL EASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: S:\Planning & Zoning\DBMS\File—Cab\Z—LM 1001-1500\LM1369.220 Dixie Blvd t. a . '�� d"h •,rt to v J4. • ~' 0 t ,4 �� ,7'�` n_ R ,. Sr i ...ft..' t''` •�� ; '1 �~ ' • 1_ { t.L i 4.4, . t 6 ._� ,•. y �. . - `1-•"., .--- gli ' ` i t.,,,f.' ,i1,,Wg-...--ytt -- - - . „„k ____u..,..t___ __. ..s,74_;___ __t:,:t __.t:;.,, ,.z..„ ,,..„ 4k;t _ ty :'a , + � , ��II�IiiiilTllIll ��I��tiE!��II�I�� III, , �- s ,�Illillill�ll�l = `' --,,--,-.q-c`-‘ke-• ----,-41--k-:..--t _,..4..<-...- 2 , ,-- - _- __, _ ta73 x ' E — £-� � 'y. �may'} l�'--��. y ✓yam' h• A - 4 ` /—- 0 11, ' ' , lx., ice. N d > yt r yc w f A. �. .1 mp;* �41 �`�.'R,i = >' y s�`" < _. 9'r- y:,' • -.` .'.v.� A.'r, ;� �_ � 8- V �xF� £_.•�.':f•-�•./ �4��_-�.�_4j�'TAM x. ` 3, h��,y�� - _ - Sri 'v • `�Y-3�e.�5 1� .y P`�`�. - �+ 4 fl, ili'`,i kii\ -1 G ,'-,,',,i,/ r J ,i/f ft ri / , f I rl 1 1 Ill- 11 , ` s}. r y.. ,: •- ,k'‘--,'''A t iI _ } -3 t; a 1 }< t _. _ ' ��. 1" . 1`" l 'GIs 1 j '_ 't p` flt 1 -.a4.m,i,,,ii,,t x2\ i. , S .., i i F - ' r ta" t � .- Frtd yam, ✓ '� ! <:ir�•yyt � Yi i i... 3s -' -• `s t-'.5ii if-r. ?'s-a7!1 ,.. '4=r•�',--` y- dt .w'; .'.=w"t1rl ay.....- isl lli. f ` i ` r. • ..1•�\ ti '1\�ti q� ,� 'rr ,hi r•1 .lit- }• N. t • klw�, - - j "j '7 \',\ ,-.A‘ lif • fir \� 4'l►! 1,1 F c i ' 1 1 �`.i' `�' i ` t +1{\t a 1•+4. i :+ t • 1 y. (��L J s r i + I l / tla + ' � - lit' A� - - •ilk& �`rill1 'M, -ti jr l •�IN . ` NO r 2- C • a- - - t. .' y. c . , •\No, ,i1,1.' • s*".\ .,\\ ,. ,,,N...\,..: ,,, ,,k‘.11. , ,•;,,,%,, \\\.k\ ' N ,;, , 1 ` ;/ 1�f . I. • d Yl/� r i } • /fi 1•; ts �' 1F `•� `mot V,:�1 4: t 3 _ sj ;s'1 r -, .. -, f j, - __i. - � f 'fit LS ` �.i.z- �`~~ • . • .� NE '��,h as 4 a6Te�� '� ,S 1 / 11♦MOW - 1.91=1111311E1111°L;: < Iv 4 • • IV -fL— It NM M • - y:A—��N�—.� �� -GEORGE��•BUSH- / . . • - . -!..—zi: I •I 1" -2w-- ��®�® ;,MfGNtE;;Qu�A�D 0ai s• ' 1_sit _ Eu--"f �� Fil , .._.1 1 A}�V...<i :,1-L:,.:..? / 4•f i 12� SV�� t NE T,h� T�f N.E. 6TH STREET . • e NE 7th ST N® .� if I t��; 1 ; '. • (TAFT AVE. - PLAT) - u: _ V� - tq 'Cal o —.5 i11 0�� NE 7,h� C' {., LAKE TERN ., NM (� 3• :16 1,fp C�k ,Gj `�,� � ��4 • ®^'ADD 5-31•-_ I-1 firNE 7•FF . . ..: JP�O �;��+ - Q of L ro g �� E��S,n�ENR ® --6,n�-"- _ H 1 • �� 4.3 ��`4� RZ s ~��T� �g,i"•a' .... i is _j�Ss" I6� •~ m•• I T • o , , ��Z 1 � ' / E i ®� ��®�it. NE 5'h Cl 1 =:-' twasE. -8. S3 33 36 =▪9 e 96 . grp * Nt JS • 1 . z .Q�� ! • P NGS �O I . I111 I�, I)� i � f- . ' 20 � •/ 0�• 4 i' .. onG� N � � . • Z �i °G � 0 � � .5 O ,i ' 9 D ,9_ B s,;. za.- =p5 b . ., 'e\ • -N. � 1 c- L - .�- . 4,h 5ST NE ` - / A � Vo \ , , . ' 'f '� : o \ LOCATION MAP • 0 ;' . (NOT TO SCALE)• t � �,• g 9,� ; O. . ,. •,. ., ib 'V. 1!',. .' -•,') \. . . • JO aunt` <, ..: ' ; - ��: �a°c4 _ • a F '� 3' o F� �-.tu a{! /',, =� ° s�o 1 •Y" 7. �Iro ` .,•: �'`�• ��'/ '\ • 5 `./ftaVv - _C>pd&1fC ✓0_3be, 1 I=or mica ci. _ 4/i3/12- : t-o% wz. 1 •oo• R- row . , BOUNDARY SURVEY n,, _ a 1w - �,a - �'_ - — •�j ',,• ' ,,‘ c, I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SKETCH SHOWN HEREON IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY MADE UNDER MY c\ • 4, � _ fi );• o•�,� DIRECTION, AND THAT SAID SURVEY IS ACCURATE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST-OF-MY KNOWLEDGE AND BEUEF. THERE ARE NO F- , ep .`-'3' • - J cf." -APPARENT GROUND ENCROACHMENTS, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN AND THAT THE SURVEY MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL N co'I• V - o ° �" t 0� STANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027, • Q �•-.. ,�, • '3• .�. 'o • e`? ,3 • FLORIDA STATUTES AND CHAPTER 61G17-6 OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. Z 1- -aNO 8: ��• -r3'a t�cp a• / � c- , W. � It. /z/z /op . 44- /2'7," •, - ..� is- ,� DATE: .-r. a,0os 4'`° �G'1- •C/ 4//3PZ �;d 2-� Tyr. eve c>E� 32...E ,...1- � G av • U, I REGISTERED SURVEYOR NO. _ - - • • ' f n h PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON HAS NOT BEEN ABSTRACTED BY SURVEYOR-FOR RIGHTS-OF-WAY, AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD; ELEVA- lx - • n( - TIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON N.G.V. DATUM UNLESS OTHERWISE-NOTED; ALL PROPERTY CORNERS ARE IRON ROD WITH CAPS, ,ti��( - UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED; FOUNDATION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS LYING BELOW SURFACE-NOT LOCATED, BEARINGS AND/OR ANGLES _ V �` 4 SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON RECORD PLAT OR DEED CALLS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. MEASUREMENTS MADE IN ACCORDANCE . r�,�aU vV\ • • • - • WITH UNITED STATES STANDARD. UNLESS IT BEARS THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR r P� ��'• . ` AND MAPPER THIS DRAWING OR SKETCH IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT VAUD. - • . - - COPYRIGHT©2008 BY RICHARD L SHEPHARD & ASSOCIATES, INC. — ALL RIGHTS RESERVED • V LB 2102 Joe Tucker THE SOUTHWESTERLY 25 FEET OF LOT 11 . • LAND `I i SCRs-cos AND ALL OF LOT 12 BLOCK 10 FOR THE BENEFIT OF: ADDRESS: • fiX_ DEL-IDA PARK,_ DELRAY, FLA. JOHN MURPHY AND CATHERINE A. MURPHY DEL• . 220 N. DIXIE BLVD. - PLAT- BOOK 9 PAGE 52 • DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444 • SOUTHEASTERN ALLIANCE TITLE AGENCY - ' RICHARD L. SHEPHARD and'Associates PALM BEACH COUNTY FLORIDA - • STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY FLOOD ZONE "X" COMMUNITY: CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL Phone. SCALE:. 1" = 30' BY• SKM DRAWING NO. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. • COMMUNITY PANEL NO.:, 125102-0002-D 219 S.E. 23RD AVENUE Boca (561) 391-4388A I n Q q n (��] ...n nrn,I rn_ , u r 4 non P.O. BOX 759 Boynton (561) 737-6546 rlri n n►Tr. .1O/O.1 /no co. one Of.. C N 1 1 R— 1 / —070/ O si (r*--:A —___ is i 49 ril a R 1 — — W 611 ,,4f ',. _ ----- -------- rid z --- --------- 4.: ":7.,,,vott:44:,---,;-,---.1.-1 a CO ii 'I,4 i \\ I I r �'i � � I I / I \: ._I• II -2 ES L. fif � I. ). XIS I REVISIONS II !i 1 al • n OR R .. _.,3\ i„ 09 u .. ..3) 1 k 0 tdi MU11.1OO18i1R1CT10H SHALL FOLLOW 1F.EL.0000 AS ADOPTED BY THE COMTY AND AS S.THE AMES DESIGN INTERNATIONAL_RESERVES,MAINTAINS AND RETAINS ITS 1 APPUCARLE TO THE AREA IN 14401 THE ILILD4G IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED PM ALL COVEN LAW COPYRIGLLT RIGHTS AHD ANY OTHER RIGHTS(EXPRESSED APPLICABLE APIER MffiMS AND/IMPLIED)IN THESE PLANS,DESIGNS,IDEAS,SPEOFICATQ7S,ETC.THESE I 2. WILDER SHOULD COORDINATE ALL TIE PICRIC C CF ALL TIETRADES. PLANS,IDEAS DESIGNS ETC.ARE NOT TO WE REPRODUCED,COPIED, SH A,:i '' 3. WILDER,SLeCGNTRICTCR,SUPPLIER,ETC.SHALL VERIFY AU.DIMENNOS, DUPLICATE,ETC,IN PIDDLE OR IN PART WITHOUT'TIE EXPRESS WRITTEN #! 1 COWITENS AT JCS SITE,PLANS,SPECIFICATION',ETC.PRIOR TO STARING ANY PERMISSION PROM THE AMES DESIGN INT 4ATICNAL NOR ARE THEY TO WE E ktYCIIK AND IdTiHIN SEVEN(7)CALEN lS DAYS OF B11LDkTRb IL87]PT aF THESE LOANED CR ASSIGNED TC AHY PEtlOI1S FIRMS,ASSOGATIONS CORPORATI E, xd 6 PLANS WALL NOTIFY THE AMO DESIGN MHENATIOW.QN WRITING OILY)OF ANY ETC.WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING A WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE AUMES DESIGN ■i< AND ALL DISCREPANCIES(NETHER DEONTA1C7ES ARE ER ORSI Cr COIMISSCN CR INTERNATIONAL, M EACH AND EVERY INSTANCE mI33ION Oe NW).OTItEBIlE THE ALES DESIGN MiE 4ATROPIC WRL NOT AWES 'i ANY 0444ES,REVISIONS ALTERATIONS,ETC.REQUIRED TO THESE PLANS Y ANY RE! 1EIUTY FOR ANY ERRORS,AND we!ULCER,ESE TRAC'MR, WILDER DRAWINGS, 51-TIIe OMEJ,TIC.SHALL.S!ES ESTID M WRITING ONLY BY ESE 'is Q WALL ASSUME FULL RE!POIESlLITY FOR ANY ERRORS AND CORRECT REVISION REVISIONS LT THE ONS, VI TFg MINES, N Rj!ERT DIE A ANY ES GN GES, SIRPLIER,ETD, TERNAI AI. WRITING OILY)W,ETC,NOT CON WY THE AT TES TO AL L� 6010R8 AT THEIR MN EQESE. INTEWAT10RA1.(IN WIRTNNG ONLY)WILL FULLY,UILONDITIOHLLLY AND ISISIL-Y A 4. TO THE!EST OF IS MC LEDGE AND AMITY THESE PLANS AS DRAW AND NOTED, RELEASE THE AMISS DESIGN INTERNATIONAL FROM ANY ND ALL RESPONSIBILITY, ®� COMPLY WITH THE BUILDING ENVELOPE ENERGY REQUIREMENTS I OF TIE FILpNA MODEL CLARIS AGAINST THE APES DESIGN IGN .TONAR_FOR CULPABILITY, ETC,FROM Ebg7' RIDGY CODE,CQZTRAGTID SHALL FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF NMI THE GOVERNING CODE THE DATE MHCMN ON THE PLANS ORIGIN UNTIL THE END OF TIME �'. IN IT'S ENTIRELY AND WILD IN ACCORDANCE MYTH ALL PROVISOS!OF TINS CODE I0.BUILDER SHALL PROVIDE INSULATION AS PER ENERGY WAOULATONS AND/OR ♦ B WNOH MAY E!SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED CN THE PLANS AND NOTES, PLAN SFB",IFlCATOIS. Pa A S. STIR FILING FILL RIDER ALL sues saw.ES CIPAN SAND AND SHALL B`: - II.ALL MATERIALS SIOIW OR CALLED FOR ON'THESE ORAVINGS SHALL to COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF ES AND A MAXIMUM DESITT AS PER ASTM D-1567, INSTALLED WITH MANUFACTURERS RECOTIEID AND SPECIFICATIONS. 41 INTERNATIONAL OO((TRAC2R SHALL VERFr UNDER COTACTI01.ALOWARE SOIL WEAROC PRESSURE APPROVED •SPECIFICATIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER ANY DETAILS �p ARCHITECTURE AND SPECIFICATIONS FOUR IN THESE PLANS.DEVIATIONS FRO'I THESE PLANS, 2503 PAU.MIN. SPECIFICATIONS AND NOTES MUST CONFORM TO A=ALRCHITECT BUILDING CODE A MIA.ALL STRUCTURAL UMBER TO BE CC UGLAS FIR-BARON ND.2 ON BETTER.ALL REQUIRE-TENTS.AND MUST WE APPROVED WY AR6NTECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION 1 LUMPIER NH COITACT NTH MASORY NULL BE PRESSURE TREATED,N10P DRAWINGS IS.NO OlE TRILL.ASSUME ANY DIMENSION DY DIRECTLY SCALING CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN CAWLLATKNB FOR LOOF TRUSSES BEARING THE SIGNATURE AND SEAL DOCUMENTS OR ANY REPRODULTOS AND SAME.IF ANY ADOTCNAL DIMENSIONS !II MG / H7 OF A PLASM REGISTERED ENGINEER WALL SE SUBMITTED TOTE ARCHITECT FOR ARE SECURED ISY CONTRACTOR AND/OR RESIDENT,CONTACT THE AMF3 DESIGN DRAM APPIOVN.PRIOR TO FABRICATION, INTERNATDNAI.FOR VERIFICATION,OTHERWISE,THE AMES DESIGN INTENATONAL 7. DOORS AND WMDOCII PECOS INDICATED PM(E)MUST L!MNNUPACTRRED TO WILL NOT ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY ERROR NOR HILL THEY CORRECT i CHECKED CORDON MTh TE WILDING CODE MTH RESPECT TO MINIMUM EMERGENCY EGRESS ANY ERROR AT THEIR EXPENSE. RIg1RGMBRTS.ALL SLICING GLASS DOORS SHALL BE TEEMED.ALL WINDOWS AND N.AU.HINDOMIS USED AS EMERGENCY EGRESS OPENING TO COMPLY WITH F.B.C. it DOORS WILL SE OWED AND;SANER STRIPPED.KNOW LOTS SULK.DISPLAY 2004 ''IOVBYYI 14, 2012 LOBES COIN UAICE NM FLORIDA STATE MIODB.cove SICTIQI 502.4.PC1 4 AND IA.w'' I ENCLOSURES' NAVE TEMPERED HAVE CLASS. GLASS. 5('At DOOR MANUFACTURERS NULL ALSO Cd>RDNATE WIN WILDER FIELD VERIFY ALL 17.ALL SLIDING GLASS DOORS INSTALL AALLG GLASS. AS Urn h.".) 17.GLAZING CONTRACTOR!HALL ALL GLASS M ACCORDANCE WITH F.B.O OPENING SAS PRIOR TO FABRICATION. 2004 IA.AU.INTRROR FTIE'D GLASS(EXCEPT AT WINDOWS)AND AU.INTERIOR FIXED il .3i ,,NM GLASS SHALL HAVE TEMPERED GLASS, r, 0 PC ALL 5IE GU 5 RS MUST BE Term WITH ANTI-SCALE FAUCETS -1 P 0. AO1 ! 8 of 10 SHEETS A DIXIE BLVD. it 20 PAVEMENT 1 le P i 2' VTR o- .1.qT .F$`''r -f '• 11 7 di !:1 j -s..y. 'as£d ' •+ EIIST ASPHALT DRIVEWAY VERIFY LOCATION EOFC SEWER -_ y - II 11 CONNECTION I DIRECTION OF I-OUSE SEWER LINE. 2 1`f<. s.-a <'` ,,Q` , II C.O. Y • _ EXIST CONCRETE SEI r f ,• U EXIST CO 11 W we s '�*` l -'..a 75.00I °-4°_�=. Ca Lu G.O. 91 ; '- Y�i r 1 <•;^-oa�/y d° 1 , j QR,T� . -re14ti a.- .. . -LAV I ,r•, i1WWE W • ALL LANDSCAPE I>,�t` Dt�", LOCALTiot4 MITT ANAL RNLI IX:C+\TION wrime 1'Kip I �._- I EX ST NO GIIANGE MST " < 1if trt i CI .1 i `.,NAPE I I� W 1 ' }5 1 EIIDR ASPHALT i gf CC DRIVEWAY ASPHALT': BEG 1+1 p t's**Wm 1 12 a :.-0 :::1'iC�'\, 1 I. SANITARY LINER SHALL BE of CAST mat,ac rvC(aGIEDULE 40)As APPROVED D THE I <V •i•�yj� •;i•:.• I I 1 tQjl.jDULDWG OFFTCLL. 2. WATER LINES SHALL BE COPPER(UN.E56 NOT DOIHERWISE). 1 :4 �< .p I E I CL 11 W � ',,. CONDENSE LINES WALL OE 3/4' rvC(salami 40),INSULATED WITH l/1'AMAFLIX. I 0 'G /'� 4. NOT WATER LINES INSULATED WITH I'AMAFLEX ABOVE. I 1 <-04�;I II LC 6. PROVIDE AIR CHAMBER WITH ALL WATER SUPPLIES. r il L. COPPER WATER LINES RUN UNDER SLAG SHALL aE PROTECTED BY MWIHUII OF 12'0 1 Ii" S¢ fWIIEARTH COVER,I'ARZWLIX(Hor WATER ONLY)AND SLEEVED To 12'ABOVE SLAG. f1 t /7. PROVIDE CONDEINSE DRIP PAN UNDERNEATH ELECTRIC WATER HEATERS.METAL.PAN I %Nit. .IG 3 � SHALL aE GALVANIZED AND RUSTPROOF.PROVIDE DRAIN LINE FROM DRIP PAN TO DSST LAN.•CAPE '�C<�YI/ ta LL. DCTERIOR OF WILDING. 1lb a. nTl FLTuTE OW CONTROL DEVICE TO GIVE YWOM*M FLOW OF(2 *• I'talk 1 GALLONS PER IIP-Q, 4 HOSE SOS To aE PROVIDED WRH G.CK PLWI PREVENTER 'r j D. ELECTRIC WATER HEATER SHALL HAVE A STAND BT LOSS NOT TO EXCEED 4.0 WATT PER .I`-I -7k' EEE - < T(W.F. • I REVISIONS SOUARE FOOT TO TANK SERVICE AREA. :: - • - I II. PLUMBING FIXTURES,TRIM,Ar ESSr�IES,COLORS,ETC.SHALL aE SELECTED.(SE (V.1 ) VAST 11111 ,_; BUILDER TO VERIFY) (-1 I , .� ST j ;I •12. ALL PCCL PLUMBING AND RELATED EOUIRIENT SHALL BE PROVIDED 6T POD I:I < ELSCO4TRAOTOR AND SHALL DE PERMITTED SEPARATELY.SEE POOL 5LBCCNTRACTOR5 • .i I I I ENGINEERED SHOP DRAWING.PLUMBING CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE(2)TWO COPIES OF 1 e THE'AS-SILT'PLU1•BWG RISER DIAGRAM TO THE AMES DESIGN INTERNATKNA1_ I II•'-..--1 .� F O. THE PLLE'BING SUBCQNTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A HOE BB AT THE POOL EGUIPIt5NT I'`_' i9 LOCATION(VERIFY LOCATQI WITH OWNER)AND!NULL LOCATE A POOL-FILL LINE WIN A 1;1 ` iI VACUUM BREAKER.PLUMING SUBCONTRACTOR STALL COORDINATE WITH POOL 1 BlBlCOj1RACTO2 AND SMALL ALSO PROVIDE A LINE,TIED DIRECTLY FROM THE'FILL. I-R LOCATION,UNDER POOL DECK(SLEEVED IN PVC PIPE)INTO TILE BAND AREA 0P POOL AND •ss.... I COORDINATE SAMEri WITH SUBCONTRACTOR. EXIST 11'-0' 14. ALL CLEAN OUTS LIP TO GRADE. COVERED '.IT(AAA•} IS. NO VENT STACKS SHALL PASS THROUGH ROOF CRICKETS OR VALLEYS. .f i CARPORT * 11 IA. SIZE AND LOCATION OF CLEAN GUTS SHALL CONFORM TO ALL LOCAL BUILDING CODE. _I II. FIXTURE SUPPLY SIBS SHALL.CCNPOOI TO ALL LOCAL WILDING CODE. •I. �'T • `� Y ti s4a Ia. PLUMBER TO DIVERT ALL VENTS TO REAR ELEVATION i< iii 0 ! 1°,v4 0 0 ti I EXIST'G I STORY C.B.S. �o d�� ` a WTI rimitOnis I. LOT HAVING.NRGSD ICON.DE AS ALL LOCAL CO ES,REG1uT1GW AND RESTRICTIONS O .[ 111-7}' w �Oy- 0 I I 2. LANDSCAPING, IRRIGATION,LE MING, ETC.,SHALL DE AS ALL LOCAL CODES, 'Sr V REGULATIONS,RSTRICTIOi1 RAVING.IURISDIGTIOI,AND FURTHER,AS 3 '� gP SELECTED AND DIRECTED 6Y BUILDER(NOT A PART OF THE AMES DESIGN � IQI INTERNATIONAL CONTRACT). t4 5. D.IVEWAYS,WALKWAYS;SLAB O1 GRADE,POD DES SWIMMING POOL ARE BT ' 1ill 7 YIS OTHERS AND PERMITTED SEPARATELY.(NOT A PART OF THE AMES DESIGN • ( 1 3 EEE .a- 1 4. SKIMMING DECK,SPA,ETC.,BY OTHERS,SEE POLL SIBCONTRACTORS • gII ` ENGINEERED SHOP DRAWINGS.PERMITTED SEPARATELY AND NOT A PART OF THE I,, /�� 4 raj AMES DESIGN INTERNATIONAL CONTRACT.SEE OWNER • 1 f - 6. LAND SURVEYOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF NOOSE OI SITE AND ANY OCOIIRRING SETBACK DKRGA411ENTS SHALL BE DROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF � THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ANY WORK BEING DONE. - 11,00, � J lib 1 6. SITE PLAN AS CRAM REFLECTS ARCHITECTS COICEPi1ON OF OVERALL SITE C FENCE . li LATOUr AND FEATURES,AND MAY NOT NFrF.wonY EE AN ACCURATE �- REPRSENTATION OF THE BUILDERS STANDARD INCLUDED FEATURES OR '1 . /�/ • .1 1 ( _- I LAYOUT AND DESIGN. 7 ;IE = a • 4rf/ THIS - �u • € NEW AREA CALCULATIONS IXI61 • iii EXIST. NEw ADD. I TOTAL 1 y4.�1-f�,/.� - PROJECT 0- :,`A.. ii PIRSY P.. I r Vv. ii'r��'.Amil ••A :.jig •i _- i• t Fes• AIR CONDITIONED AREA 2676 S.F. NEW BED ROOM 476 SF. SOOT SF. I I ' 1! ALL LANDSCAPE gg A o AND CLOSETS - .f--{ EXIST NO CHANGE u"1'4. • 3 m e v IXBTG OTDIIAfd a4•S,. ORSF. I • c`, Iti AROHREOTNRE}d I 4 1 EXIST'!.CAR PORT 2STS.F. Za'1<Si'. 1. I I A. ►o+♦ { • Bel ECIECT'G COVERED ENTRY 144 S.F. 1'C4 S.F. ! °I a p d9� ��. TOTAL MR CONDITIONED AREA 3,004 S.P. lit 1,.I r/. EX15GO'GT UEST P.1 ' ;� M G 4. TOTAL LOT AREA b,SOD S.F. (It l]1ECIffO LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED(40i) 4,200 S.F. •S' G. a 1ST 33E i LOT C:O✓ERAGE PROVIDED 5,62S SF. 12 ..I' E • Novembe r 14, 2012 1 % 3 kb"SCALE_0. -7I ��.12L _ _ - . - f �;j; .a' 08 3 0 1.i § _ i I 4 LANDSCCAPE - - :. rI A a 2 75.001g DF 10 sIiTE•Isi a i [O lI ..id SINK '-_, EXIST I EXISMAIN HOUSE ! — T 1 KITCHEN '0 ec" W PAPA l; IWErN EXIST'G�IOF!COST% LAA p ► Qy1 LOCATION STO. , I REF a Ale MISTS L —?` '�rT.0 QL--- I I I _ I e-I 1 5T'G WIN, I _ T0-T. EXIST {p e • o1 -- FRAMING KITCHEN Op EXIST'G FAMILY I `- 11 �, . 1i EL+O'-O'-IdiaL CCOR AND WE ai3� a _ I �� It .4iii O•EN'G 0�_ p.16.5i _ f111tF °r _ _ sr'G OS.AND -r- ' �� l�t� g VI $UO4ER�� •-- -, �CCCCNCLT0 REMAIN r ® 7 J ye ,i- MI 5. A '�+,ii .2.Xp 'Y, ExlarG wN. :O vp W 1S r- FRAMING �^ VI �� 2aXi• a�� \IDDST'G In AMING ,FS I I l NI . LT IN ST TO E �_I I I 'I "-_-�iL_�L- 'LLJ -T OTHERS . R,9'GVED a '� -- _ - r OTA.AAB W a 25j:•• - -_ I I1.+0'-O'-14.aG' W/5L.FIELD V. u 1 j u I - VERIFY S� I 11 re Y. 1. '1 , I - 1�r1 ® G -----I it lC ;, : NEH HED RM g I I NEW STOUP TD ' sT L-i---- I n R a'-2'CLG. i r I I FIATCH EXISTG I I I ZQ 111 u �a� , 11 II T-II o T.OSLAB _ I z_Jk le ■70 II }* 11 cm IA-I IN a a I a TT-4 I S l CSIIILl. u - 3 n jj 4e m n I.k 4 = PROJECT 11 o a REVISIONS / ° / ! Tr e 311011 a__„ • - - • ?11 aKe s1 -IZrl.- 1 4'-+f' I EXISTY.DECO WATER A,D9-14-2009 2' 3. I 5%2' i L 4 eI MG 7, f-'', `� PIPE TO BA R17'MOVID BUIL.DINC DEP CEMENT ST%DECO AWNING I T EOST'G NB. iyI -? r - _ .-C Two BE REMOVED TOS Er Hi I 8¢ AIR NN ` I FRAMING EXISTIG �� L - 11 �FSI !� GUEST t .� BATH r-t E I `- I T --17 $1 . I I• I 4� I -- I I INISW LOG • o MI- , I GUEST I j CRAW ED I'►• 1 I COTTAGE Ili DRAM I E I I r-h 52CLG. p� as PI .a ,t. � 1 I, Ill IREnove I ,I I,_%'' III •TAD.11 VAULT EXIST'G 41 1 HOOD DECK @f EXIST'G WN. I i 1 ; _ CEILING Ii AND ELK.WALLOELCW PREP I El 1 - 3 Iai• ' ., •j RECEIVE NEW IL--t E DR. I II ii �s I ----1—iL, I L� ` r-- ----I---- -- -- -�-- _ VS if Z I Lam-— �T.OSLAB I Pi"'EL -0'-'Mac' p r' Slit N.?Iort� DOOM/M) 0PI 1071�s Ili f L SEE FOUND.PLAN FOR SLAG STEPS*SLOPES t FOR CAUTIN5,FILLED I. SEE PLAN AND ELEVATIONS FOR HIGH GLASS SRE AND LOCATIONS. FE moo(CELLS,ETC HA 2. ALL GLAZING NULL CCFIFLY WITH CHAPTER 24.OF MC.2007. e�H1E . IN RS 2. VERIFY ALL MASONRY t WO.FRAME OPENING SIZES TO FIT DOO t S. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR ANCHORAGE OF AU.DOOR JAMBS,HEADS 1��11 tt WIG BEFORE CONSTRUCTION-NOTIFY ARCHITECT IF A CONFLICT AND SILLS.ALSO REFER TO DETAIL SHEET FOR ANCHORAGE OF ii m r S EXISTS, GARAGE DOOR BUCICS. e S. USE WATER-RESISTANT GYP.BOARD TN ALL!BATHROOMS I OTHER WET 4. Al. WINDOWS AND GLASS IN EXT.DOOR TO BE IMPACT-RESISTANT C AREAS. GLASS. P4 INTERNATIONAL 4. PROVIDE WOOD SACKING OVOID CABINETS,SHELVES,BATH 5_ EGRESS WINDOWS NULL COMPLY WITH SEG ICOS.A,2/1..D.0 2007-EACH ARONITEOTURE Ai-C.F"RIES,ETC. EGRESS WNDOA SHALL PROVIDE A GEAR OPENING NOT LESS THAN q 5. ALL ATTIC SPACES AND SPACES ABOVE CEILING SHALL SE DIVIDED 20'IN WITH,24'N HEIGHT AND MN,OF 5.7 S.F.IN AREA.BOTTC9 INTO HORIZONTAL AREAS NOT TO EXCEED 5,070 S.F.BY DRAFT EDGE OF SUCH OPENING SHALL.NOT BE MORE THAW 44'AFF.AND NO STOPS.PROVIDE A 225S0(MIN)ATTIC ACCESS INTO EACH SPACE PART OF THE OPERATING MEC ANISM SH LL BE MORE THAN 54'AFF. DRAHMNDIVIDEDDDED IN A DRAFT STOP.(SEE I7TL SHEET) THE MODEOF OPERATION SHALL NOT REWIRE THE USE OF A IR iY, 1 MG / HT TOOL,SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE CR EFFORT. 111 CHECKED i. ALL GLASS SHOWER t TUB ECLOSUREB SHALL BE TEMPERED GLASSS, 7. EMERGENCY EGRESS DOOR-DO NOT SPUTTER [� HALL LEGEND 5. DOORS BETWEEN GARAGE a HOUSE rUST BE SCUD CORE 15/4'THICK ! November 14DATE 2012 W/EM SCUD RA®ETFD JAPE,OR A C-LADEN METAL DOOR t 14rB. / DOORS TO HAVE AUTOMATIC CLOSER AS INDICATED IN DOOR IL, Sr Al F T NEIl RY ETE soHEDULE. 4• - II_0" at GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ALL WIDOW A DOOR Np. - EXIST.EXTERIOLL Cu SIZFSSA7PENNGS PRIOR TO ORDERING FROM SUPPLIER JOB08 30120 - (KNEE WALL) 10. FOR AU.EXTERIOR DOORS/WINDOWS,PRODUCT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED.SUBMIT TO ARCHITECT OR ENGNE R FOR REVIEW AND SHEET NEW METAL STUD TO BUILDING DEPT.FOR APPROVAL. - PARTMC N II. GLASS OR MIRRORS IMMEDIATELY SURROUNDING A BATHTUB OR INTERIOR IND.OR NIL SHOWER ENCLOSURE SHALL BE SAFETY GLAZED WHERE LESS THAN IHY �0 3 Rum WALL(KNEE ABOVE FLOOR OF TUB OR SHOWER. fl "'I r' WALL.) '12. AU.GLASS IN DOORS A AU.SLIDING GULLS DOORS TO SE TET'RERED w GLA . �d t o 10 SHEETS 3 d ti s$ it ¢9 ig ii Yl MST 11 /NEIN ROOFTO (V )4 �O IXIST.VENT MATCH E70ST __— _ (VJF.) IX17TWG 1 ROOF NS �- _ RETWNG 4 _- - 4,per //�\ .._ — -- -- _ -- - _ _ _- :..-- - - _ —_ /. _. --- - - --_- _ _ REMAING aZaL i T.jBFAM -_ ! -- _. _ `` , W EL.*8-2 % - -- ,. 1 qi a II— \ \ \\ I li II011 F W itICC I / Iii r� b = m DDST IXI.S'T WINDOW TO WINDOW TO WINDOW TO — WINOGYI TO DR-TO IST NEW �y REMAIN RR-TO EXU'-T REMAIN REMAIN RETt41N i9 i Wall. • Lff T LI.LNA?ION if 11 REVISIONS BY 11 &Oa-20-2009 MO 1: ADDED MULLIONS 6� • f II . 1 [/ DUSTING NpN ROiOF 1B E7WT 12 ROOF TO IXUiTING IX� ' (WF.)417- REMAINS ROOF TO SYSTEM I ROOF TO //' nAra EXIsr tt11A1NG NEW ROOF � REMAINS Ili i ____ /_—__._—_ I NEW ROOF RFIOCATED TO 11 ------- - __ \ _ _ - _�—1 SYSTEM TO DRAIN MAla1 EXIST�\ _ _ __ _ ' MATCH EXIST "i I __ _ 3} ;LOST - \� —_ i --- � � 4 ___ TOBEAM i VAX. // TO REMAIN r--- 71.____.:: — ram= y $EXIST -`1� 1 N. _- � / / / Ct.T.O Bf�Ahl I L ELaG 7r D / / / / �i hlt ,.: EZI _ yiit t; �C W T'�5 Ei ea., b 13 \� ^\� \\ `\\ EXIST o I i ii e F TO REMAIN = .j�� I WINDLH TO e EXIST E ! _ REMAIN�_ ❑ MICA FIN.TO fNy 13 F a 6 _�_�r % I �I_---LI I C1C&.OP6_ _-,, --- TTS.., o 3C EXIST I lr , r r I , __ ____ �� 61'`-' - I-J !!! MOST D !MST DOOR DUST EL- 7 /i TO REYWN WIREIAI TO TO REMAINEXIST WINO / NW � - V.IF. I HEWFX5T r, 1 kli idIGHT ELEVATION FA IAmes INTERNATIOIIAL d I` AROHITEOTURE qe lik MG D% H7 I� ilk DCHECKEDi �11 DATE ki Q November E 2012 �4++ONp 08--3920 SHEET t A041 EE OF 10 SHEETS A Historic Preservation Board I AGENDA 132( SIGN IN SHEET ❑ FORM 8B El BOARD ORDER Er VOTING SHEET ❑ MINUTES