Loading...
HPB-04-01-09 AGENDA P HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD Meeting Date: April 1, 2009 Time: 6:00 P.M. Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: City Commission Chambers The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service,program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Smith at 243-7144 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing,such persons will need a record of these proceedings,and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Two or more City Commissioners may be in attendance. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. 244 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District— James Franklin, Property Owner; JMWA Architects, Inc., Authorized Agent. Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness (2009-111) for the demolition of a non- contributing structure, and new construction of a single-family residence with associated site improvements. VI. REPORTS AND COMMENTS • Public Comments • Board Members • Staff VII. ADJOURN am* E. Wv.ate z Amy E. Alvarez Historic Preservation Planner Posted on: March 27, 2009 J BEACH brirailiDE,LR/"Y„ All-America City r 1991 2001 SIGN IN SHEET Regular Historic Preservation Board Meeting April 1 , 2009 PRINT FULL NAME ADDRESS OR ITEM NO. ORGANIZATION VISUAL COMPATIBILITY STANDARDS I. Visual Compatibility Standards. New construction and all improvements to both contributing and noncontributing buildings, structures and appurtenances thereto within a designated historic district or on an individually designated property shall be visually compatible. In addition to the Zoning District Regulations, the Historic Preservation Board shall apply the visual compatibility standards provided for in this Section with regard to height, width, mass, scale, façade, openings, rhythm, material, color, texture, roof shape, direction, lot coverage, and square footage, and other criteria set forth elsewhere in Section 4.5.1. Visual compatibility for minor and major development as referenced in Section 4.5.1(E)(2) shall be determined by utilizing criteria contained in (a)-(m) below. Visual compatibility for all development on individually designated properties outside the district shall be determined by comparison to other structures within the site. 0 Height: The height of proposed buildings or modifications shall be visually compatible in comparison or relation to the height of existing structures and buildings in a historic district for all major and minor development. For major development, visual compatibility with respect to the height of residential structures, as defined by 4.5.1(E)(2)(a), shall also be determined through application of the following: 1. Building Height Plane (BHP): The building height plane technique sets back the overall height of a building from the front property line. The building height plane line is extended at an inclined angle from the intersection of the front yard property line and the average grade of the adjacent street along the lot frontage. The inclined angle shall be established at a two to one (2:1) ratio. C BAD , i' ,I j tC _ 1 rcl «< I -- O 1 215': �STCP:C I • , a sT0Pv - �▪I \ SE'9A OK =1 p .'' /-25_ _/ ' 1 /---3 0 r':— 1 I 550'—/ 50 3---_ _ ____—_.__ __/ BUILDING HEIGHT PLANE AT 2:1 RATIO 1 . b. A structure relocated to a historic district or to an individually designated historic site shall be exempt from this requirement. 2. First Floor Maximum Height: a. Single-story or first floor limits shall be established by: 0 Height from finished floor elevation to top of beam (tie or bond) shall not exceed fourteen feet(14'). Mean Roof Height shall not exceed eighteen feet(18'). CDii. . iii. Any portion exceeding the dimensions described in i. and ii above shall be considered multi-story structures. iv. See illustration below: 12 ROOF PITCH MAY VARY 6 MEAN ROOF HT. x TOP OF BEAM Q x 4 a \ F.F.E. v. Sections i. and ii., above may be waived by the Historic Preservation Board when appropriate, based on the architectural style of the building. 3. Upper Story Height: YES NO 0. Height from finished floor elevation to finished floor elevation or top of beam (tie or bond) shall not exceed twelve feet(12'). Are the requirements for height met? 7 if) Front Facade Proportion: The front façade of YES NO each building or structure shall be visually compatible with and be in direct relationship to the width of the building and to the height of the front elevation of other existing structures and buildings within the subject historic district. / Are the requirements for front facade , / proportion met? v * C. Proportion of Openings (Windows and Doors): The openings of any building within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the openings exemplified by prevailing historic architectural styles of similar buildings within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors to the height of windows and doors among buildings shall be visually compatible within the subject historic district. / Are the requirements for proportion of openings . / (windows and doors) proportion met? ✓✓✓ 'CD) Rhythm of Solids to Voids: The relationship of solids to voids of a building or structure shall be visually compatible with existing historic buildings or structures within the subject historic district for all development, with particular attention paid to the front facades. Are the requirements for rhythm of solids to voids met? tE. Rhythm of Buildings on Streets: The relationship of buildings to open space between them and adjoining buildings shall be visually compatible with the relationship between existing historic buildings or structures within the subject historic district. Are the requirements for rhythm of buildings on streets met? 3 YES NO Rhythm of Entrance and/or Porch Projections: The relationship of entrances and porch projections to the sidewalks of a building shall be visually compatible with existing architectural styles of entrances and porch projections on existing historic buildings and structures within the subject historic district for all development. Are the requirements for rhythm of entrance and/or porch projections met?:tro . _ Relationship of Materials, Texture, and Color: The relationship of materials, texture, and color of the facade of a building and/or hardscaping shall be visually compatible with the predominant materials used in the historic buildings and structures within the subject historic district. Are the requirements for relationship of materials, texture, and color met? C) Roof Shapes: The roof shape, including type and slope, of a building or structure shall be visually compatible with the roof shape of existing historic buildings or structures within the subject historic district. The roof shape shall be consistent with the architectural style of the building. Are the requirements of roof shapes met? .., Walls of Continuity: Walls, fences, evergreen landscape masses, or building facades, shall form cohesive walls of enclosure along a street to ensure visual compatibility with historic buildings or structures within the subject historic district and the structure to which it is visually related. Are the requirements of walls of continuity met? 4 (J� Scale of a Building: The size of a building and the `\ building mass in relation to open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, porches, and lot size shall be visually compatible with the building size and mass of historic buildings and structures within a historic district for all development3To determine whether the scale of a building is appropriate, the following shall apply for major development only: 1. For buildings wider than sixty percent (60%) of the lot width, a portion of the front façade must be setback a minimum of seven (7) additional feet from the front setback line: a. Lots sixty-five (65) feet or less in width are exempt from this requirement. b. To calculate how much of the building width must comply with this provision, multiply the lot width by 40% and subtract the required minimum side setbacks (example: 100' lot width x 40% = 40' - 15' side yard setbacks=25'). c. Any part or parts of the front façade may be used to meet this requirement. d. See illustration below: 75 LOT 75 LOT 7.5' 7.5' 7.55 7.5' 6Q'BUILDING 60'BUILDING I — 1-! 45 1. 15' ' _ 22.5' 15' _ 22.5' _I a r n a _1 5 e. If the entire building is set back an additional seven (7) feet, no offset is required. 2. For buildings deeper than fifty percent (50%) of the lot depth, a portion of each side façade, which is greater than one story high, must be setback a minimum of five (5) additional feet from the side setback line: a. To calculate how much of the building depth must comply with this provision, multiply the lot depth by fifty percent (50%) and subtract the required minimum front and rear setbacks (example: 120' lot depth x 50% = 60' - 25' front yard setback - 10' rear setback=25'). b. Any part or parts of the side façades may be used to meet this requirement. c. See illustration below: r 73 LOT 75 LOT 1.2 N S - N 7.st S0' 1..s• 7.S�S 50' 67.5 N � d. If the entire building is set back an additional five (5) feet from the side, no offsets are required on that side. 6 YES NO 3. Porches may be placed in the offset portion of the front or side façades, provided they are completely open except for supporting columns and/or railings. Are the requirements for the scale of a building met? CK Directional Expression of Front Elevation: A building shall be visually compatible with the buildings, structures, and sites within a historic district for all development with regard to its directional character, whether vertical or horizontal. Is the directional expression requirement for the 11 front elevation met? Architectural Style: All major and minor development shall consist of only one (1) architectural style per structure or property and not introduce elements definitive of another style. Is the requirement for the architectural style / met? V M. Additions to Individually Designated Properties and to Contributing Structures in all Historic Districts. Visual compatibility shall be accomplished as follows: 1. Additions shall be located to the rear or least public side of a building and be as inconspicuous as possible. Is this requirement met? 2. Additions or accessory structures shall not be located in front of the established front wall plane of a historic building. Is this requirement met? 7 YES NO 3. Characteristic features of the original building shall not be destroyed or obscured. Is this requirement met? 4. Additions shall be designed and constructed so that the basic form and character of the historic building will remain intact if the addition is ever removed. Is this requirement met? 5. Additions shall not introduce a new architectural style, mimic too closely the style of the existing building nor replicate the original design, but shall be coherent in design with the existing building. Is this requirement met? 6. Additions shall be secondary and subordinate to the main mass of the historic building and shall not overwhelm the original building. Is this requirement met? 8 le, = CITY OF DELRAY BEACH 1„ HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD ORDER In Re: 2„ S —A ve (applicant's name and address) ORDER Following consideration of all the evidence and testimony presented at the / 2g (date) meeting before the Historic Preservation Board for the City of Delray Beach dnd pursuant to Section(s) 2.4.6(H), 4.5.1, and/or 4.5.1(J) of the Land Development Regulations and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Delray Beach, the Historic Preservation Board finds that there is ample and _competent ubstantial evidence to support its findings that the application f9r (Yl( 1 h o/1 ° (0/1 _ on the property referenced above is hereby J granted denied by a vote of - () . Pursuant to LDR Sections 2.4.7(E)(1) and 2.4.7(E)(3)(a), a decision of the Historic Preservation Board may be appealed to the City Commission so long as a letter of appeal is received by the City Clerk within ten (10) working days of the action being appealed. c 4 Based oil the e Lire record before it, the Historic Preservation Board adopts this Order this day of -t1 v , 20W. l Chair Historic Preservation Board copies to: (applicant) 3 - 7 DEMOLITIONS Restrictions on Demolitions: No structure within a Historic District or on a Historic Site shall be demolished without first receiving a Certificate of Appropriateness pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H). The Historic Preservation Board shall be guided by LDR Section 4.5.1(F) considering such a request. (1) The Historic Preservation Board upon a request for demolition by a property owner, shall consider the following guidelines in evaluating applications for a certificate of appropriateness for demolition of designated historic sites, historic interiors, or buildings, structures, or appurtenances within designated historic districts; Yes No (a) Whether the structure is of such interest or quality that it would reasonably fulfill criteria for designation for listing on the national register. Would the structure fulfill criteria for listing ./ on the national register? (b) Whether the structure is of such design, craftsmanship, or material that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty or economically nonviable expense. Would the structure require great difficulty or expense to reproduce? (c) Whether the structure is one of the last remaining examples of its kind in the designated historic district within the City. Is the structure one of the last remaining examples of its kind in the designated historic district? +/ (d) Whether retaining the structure would promote the general welfare of the city by providing an opportunity to study local history, architecture, and design, or by developing an understanding of the importance and value of a particular culture and heritage. 1 3 Would retaining the structure promote the general welfare of the City? (e) Whether there are approved plans for immediate reuse of the property if the proposed demolition is carried out, and what effect those plans will have on the surrounding area. Are there approved plans for immediate reuse of the property? (2) Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(7), the owner shall provide the following information on his/her application for any contributing structure in a historic district or individually designated historic structure: Yes No (a) A certified report from a registered architect or engineer which provides documentation explaining that the building is structurally unsound and is damaged beyond the ability to repair it at a reasonable cost. The report must include photographs to substantiate the damage. Has a certified report been provided explaining that the building is structurally unsound? (b) A certified report from an engineer, architect, general contractor, or other qualified professional which documents the projected cost of repairing the structure and returning it to a safe and habitable condition. Has a certified report been provided illustrating the projected cost of repairing the structure? (c) An appraisal of the property in its current condition, its value as vacant land and its potential value as a preserved and restored historic property. Has an appraisal been provided? 2 (d) Documentation that reasonable efforts have been made to find a suitable alternate location for the structure within the City of Delray Beach to which the contributing/ individually designated historic structure could be safely relocated. Have efforts been made to relocate the structure? 3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT Applicant: James Franklin Authorized Agent: JMWA Architects, Inc. Property Address: 244 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District HPB Meeting Date: April 1, 2009 File No.: 2009-111 ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is the consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) associated with the demolition of a non-contributing single-family residence, and the construction of a single-family residence on the property located at 244 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H). BACKGROUND & PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject property consists of Lot 13, Gracey Byrd Subdivision, and is located within the Marina Historic District. A circa 1972 one-story, 1,430 square foot single-family residence exists on the property which is located on the northwest corner of SE 7th Avenue and SE 3rd Street and is zoned R-1-AA (Single-Family Residential). The Hamilton Place multi-story development is located to the west of the subject property. There are no previous COAs on file for the subject property. Building permit records show the construction of a swimming pool in 1997. The subject proposal is for the demolition of the existing non-contributing structure which is set back from SE 7th Avenue and faces SE 3rd Street. The aforementioned swimming pool is located between the east elevation and SE 7`h Avenue and will remain with the proposed new development. A four foot (4') tall chain link fence runs the perimeter of the swimming pool and associated patio, while a six foot (6') tall wood fence runs along the north property line. An asphalt, circular driveway currently provides an entry to the property from SE 3`d Street. The proposed new development consists of the following: • Construction of a three-story single family residence consisting of 3,279 total square feet under air (950-1s`story, 1,100-2"d story, 1,229-3`d story), and an attached two-car garage with access from SE 3rd Street; • Expansion of the swimming pool front courtyard and replacement of patio with brick pavers; • Installation of a 4' tall, concrete block and stucco wall with decorative cap banding around front courtyard; • Installation of 4' tall wood fence along the west property line; • Site landscaping and improvements; • Color scheme and materials as follows: o Smooth Stucco—Arcade White o Textured Stucco—Sheraton Sage o Hardi-Plank Siding —Glad Yellow w/white trim 2.44 SE 7th Avenue;COA 2009-111 HPS Pv1eeUna a`Apr,1 1,2009 Page 2 of 8✓ o Standing Seam Metal Roof—Champagne o Doors and Windows by PGT— Bunglehouse Blue o Columns (PVC)—Arcade White o Railings and Fencing (Custom Aluminum)—Arcade White o Decorative Brackets (Architectural Foam)—Arcade White o Window Trim (Raised Smooth Stucco)—Arcade White o Windows Trim (Hardi-Plank Trim Boards)—Arcade White The analysis provided below offers a more in depth explanation of the proposal in conjunction with the review for compliance with the required review criteria. ANALYSIS COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), Development Standards, properties located within the R-1- AA zoning district shall be developed according to the requirements noted in the chart below. While it is illustrated that the proposal is in compliance with the requirements, it should also be noted that the property is a Lot of Record, and its development does not require compliance with those unchanging factors such as lot size, width, depth, and frontage. I Required Proposed Height 35' 32' Front Setback (East) 30' 58' Side Street Setback (South) 15' 15' Side Interior Setback (North) 10' 10' Rear Setback (West) I 10' 10' Open Space (Non-vehicular) I 25% 50% _ Lot Covers e I --- 50% Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H)(5), Prior to approval, a finding must be made that any Certificate of Appropriateness which is to be approved is consistent with Historic Preservation purposes pursuant to Objective A-4 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and specifically with provisions of Section 4.5.1, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E), Development Standards, all development regardless of use located within historic districts, whether contributing or noncontributing, residential or nonresidential, shall comply with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, these regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(2)(b)(1), Major Development, the subject application is considered "Major Development" as it is new construction. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(3)(a)(1.)(c.), Fences and Walls, fences and walls over four feet(49 shall not be allowed in front or side street setbacks. 244 SE 7th Avenue:COA 2009-111 HPB Meeting ofAprii 1,2009 Page 3 of 8 STAFF COMMENT: A 6' wood fence exists along the north property line, and the proposed 4' privacy wall is in compliance with the subject requirement. Therefore, positive findings can be made. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(3)(a)(2.)(a.)(i.-ii.), Garages and Carports, garages are encouraged to be oriented and entered from the side or rear and out of view from the public right of way, and garage doors should be designed to be compatible with the architectural style of the principal structure and include individual openings for vehicles rather than two car expanses of doors. Metal two car garage doors are discouraged. STAFF COMMENT: The proposed two-car garage provides access from SE 3rd Street, which is the side of the proposed residence. While it is visible from the right-of-way, it is not located on the main façade nor does it dominate the elevation. In addition, the two individual garage doors comply with the subject LDR. Therefore, positive findings can be made with respect to the subject LDR. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(5), Standards and Guidelines, a historic site, building, structure, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall only be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, as amended from time to time. The applicable Standards are noted below: A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment. (Standard 1) .404 The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic 110V-- materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. ` (Standard 2) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. (Standard 9) New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. (Standard 10) STAFF ANALYSIS: The property will be maintained as a single-family residence; those characteristics of the property with respect to the setting on the property will be maintained with the existing footprint minimally altered or expanded. While the structure to be demolished is a non-contributing single-family residence, its removal will not significantly impact the district. The new construction respects the existing relationship between the structure and the streetscape both along SE 7th Avenue and SE 3rd Street. The integrity of the district, particularly the immediate surroundings is not likely to be impacted. Therefore, positive findings can be made with respect to the subject LDR requirement. The Guidelines recommend the following with respect to new construction: t�l�l 244 SE 7ih Avenue;COA 2.009-111 HPB Meetina of Anti!1,2009 Page 4 of 8 • The height of any new buildings should be similar to those of other building along the streetscape. • The new construction shall be compatible with the width of the surrounding buildings. • The horizontal rhythms between the buildings also should be maintained. • The side and rear setbacks of the new construction must be met and aligned with the façade of the surrounding buildings. • The orientation of the main elevation to the street also should be respected. • The character of the massing should be compatible with the surrounding buildings. • Streetscape elements such as the divisions between stories, porch heights, and the alignment of windows and window sills should be extended to the new construction. STAFF COMMENT: While the proposed height is larger than that of the other buildings along the streetscape, the additional stories are significantly setback from SE 7th Avenue alleviating an impact on the historic district. The proposal is compatible in terms of massing and scale, as the design has been determined by the existing swimming pool, which is to be maintained, along with the limited buildable area of the subject property. Positive findings can be made with respect to the subject LDR requirement. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(7), Demolition, Demolition of historic or archaeological sites, or buildings, structures, improvements, and appurtenances within historic districts shall be regulated by the Historic Preservation Board in the manner described in Section 4.5.1(F). Demolition of any structure, whether contributing or non-contributing, shall not occur until a building permit has been issued for the HPB approved redevelopment. All structures approved for demolition and awaiting issuance of a building permit for the redevelopment shall be maintained in a manner similar to that in which it existed at time of application unless the Chief Building Official determines that an unsafe building condition exists in accordance with Section 4.5.1(G). STAFF COMMENT: The existing structure is non-contributing, and cannot be demolished until the permit for the approved new construction has been issued. This has been added as a condition of approval for further emphasis of this requirement. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8), Visual Compatibility Standards, New construction within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. In addition to the Zoning District Regulations, the Historic Preservation Board shall apply the visual compatibility standards provided for in this Section with regard to height, width, mass, scale, façade, openings, rhythm, material, color, texture, roof shape, direction, lot coverage, and square footage, and other criteria set forth elsewhere in Section 4.5.1. Visual compatibility for major development as referenced in Section 4.5.1(E)(2) shall be determined by utilizing criteria contained in (a)-(m) below. Those applicable Standards within LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8) are noted below. (a) Height: The height of proposed buildings or modifications shall be visually compatible in comparison or relation to the height of existing structures and buildings in a historic district for all major and minor development. For major development, visual compatibility with respect to the height of residential structures, as defined by 4.5.1(E)(2)(a), shall also be determined through application of the following: 244 SE 7tn Avenue;COA 2009-111 HPB Kaleeu,rg of Apr;1,2009 Page 5 of 8 1. Building Height Plane (BHP): The building height plane technique sets back the overall height of a building from the front property line and is determined by an inclined angle from the intersection of the front yard property line and the average grade of the adjacent street along the lot frontage. The inclined angle shall be established at a two to one (2:1) ratio. 2. First Floor Maximum Height: Requires that the height from finished floor elevation to top of beam (tie or bond) not exceed fourteen feet (14), and that the mean roof height not exceed eighteen feet (18). Any portion exceeding these dimensions shall be considered multi-story structures. 3. Upper Story Height: Requires that the height from finished floor elevation to finished floor elevation or top of beam (tie or bond) not exceed twelve feet(12). 0\ (b) Front Facade Proportion: The front facade of each building or structure shall be visually L compatible with and be in direct relationship to the width of the building and to the height of the front elevation of other existing structures and buildings within the subject historic district. ,,,i,\ (c) Proportion of Openings (Windows and Doors): The openings of any building within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the openings exemplified by prevailing historic architectural styles of similar buildings within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors to the height of windows and doors among buildings shall be visually compatible within the subject historic district. (d) Rhythm of Solids to Voids: The relationship of solids to voids of a building or structure shall be visually compatible with existing historic buildings or structures within the subject Ahistoric district for all development, with particular attention paid to the front facades. (e) Rhythm of Buildings on Streets: The relationship of buildings to open space between them and adjoining buildings shall be visually compatible with the relationship between existing historic buildings or structures within the subject historic district. (f) Rhythm of Entrance and/or Porch Projections: The relationship of entrances and porch projections to the sidewalks of a building shall be visually compatible with existing architectural styles of entrances and porch projections on existing historic buildings and structures within the subject historic district for all development. (g) Relationship of Materials, Texture, and Color: The relationship of materials, texture, and A color of the facade of a building and/or hardscaping shall be visually compatible with the predominant materials used in the historic buildings and structures within the subject historic district. (h) Roof Shapes: The roof shape, including type and slope, of a building or structure shall be \\\ visually compatible with the roof shape of existing historic buildings or structures within the "\ subject historic district. The roof shape shall be consistent with the architectural style of the building. (i) Walls of Continuity: Walls, fences, evergreen landscape masses, or building facades, shall '\ form cohesive walls of enclosure along a street to ensure visual compatibility with historic buildings or structures within the subject historic district and the structure to which it is visually related. V (j) Scale of a Building: The size of a building and the building mass in relation to open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, porches, and lot size shall be visually compatible with 244 SE 7th Avenue;COA 2009-111 HP3 Meet n,of Apr l 1,2009 Pane.6 of 8 y L the building size and mass of historic buildings and structures within a historic district for all development. To determine whether the scale of a building is appropriate, the additional regulations apply to lots greater than 65'wide. (k) Directional Expression of Front Elevation: A building shall be visually compatible with the L1 buildings, structures, and sites within a historic district for all development with regard to its directional character, whether vertical or horizontal. (I) Architectural Style: All major and minor development shall consist of only one (1) architectural style per structure or property and not introduce elements definitive of another style. STAFF ANALYSIS: Those "Visual Compatibility Standards which require analysis are noted below. (a) — The proposal is significantly setback from the front property line and complies with the required BHP setback. Further, the story heights are less than the maximums permitted, as they range from 8' to 9'6". (b)-(f) —The proportions of the structure, with respect to height and width, are compatible along the streetscape and in keeping with those within the historic district. While the introduction of a three-story single-family residence may create some uneasiness from the perceived impacts, (since the Marina Historic District was recently reduced in size partially due to larger, inappropriate new construction), the design is compatible and does not create a negative impact on the historic district. Further, the limitations within the site in addition to the development being created around the existing swimming pool, greatly assist in the provision of a compatible new development. The overall proportions are appropriate, the rhythm of buildings on the streetscape will not be impacted, as this rhythm is being replicated through the new development, while providing additional open spaces within the structure, such as the porches on the front and side street elevations. (g) — The proposal consists of a combination of exterior finishes such as smooth and textured stucco as well as hardiplank siding with a standing seam metal roof. These finishes and the combination of colors provided are all appropriate and compatible. However, the Board may want to consider that the entire structure be finished in one material, either stucco or siding, as the historic structure would have likely been finished in one or the other, but not both. (h-i) — The roof shapes are compatible with the Boston hip and the hip overhangs provided where the upper stories are setback, creating further interest in the aesthetics of the structure and breaking up the wall planes. The walls of continuity have been complied with in that the visual compatibility between the structure and the surrounding properties will not be negatively impacted, and the proposed landscaping will ensure further compatibility along the streetscape. (j) - The lot width is 50', and therefore, the additional regulations outlined in (j) are not required. Generally, the scale of the proposed new construction is compatible, as it is broken up in massing, open air porches are provided, and is further minimized given the lot constraints for new development. (k-I) — The direction of the front elevation is apparent in the design, as the other elevations are subordinate with respect to their aesthetic interest. Further, the proposal is architecturally consistent in that it primarily incorporates floribbean design characteristics. 244 SE 7th AverJo,COA 2009-111 HPB Meeting of Apr i 1,2009 Page 7 of 8 Based on the analysis provided above, positive findings can be made with respect to the LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8), Visual Compatibility Standards. A complete set of plans and color renderings are included as attachments. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(F), Restrictions on Demolitions, no structure within a Historic District or on a Historic Site shall be demolished without first receiving a Certificate of Appropriateness pursuant to Section 2.4.6(H). The Historic Preservation Board shall be guided by the following in considering such a request. (1) The Historic Preservation Board upon a request for demolition by a property owner, shall consider the following guidelines in evaluating applications for a certificate of appropriateness for demolition of designated historic sites, historic interiors, or buildings, structures, or appurtenances within designated historic districts; (a) Whether the structure is of such interest or quality that it would reasonably fulfill criteria for designation for listing on the national register. (b) Whether the structure is of such design, craftsmanship, or material that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty or economically nonviable expense. (c) Whether the structure is one of the last remaining examples of its kind in the designated historic district within the city (d) Whether retaining the structure would promote the general welfare of the city by providing an opportunity to study local history, architecture, and design, or by developing an understanding of the importance and value of a particular culture and heritage. (e) Whether there are approved plans for immediate reuse of the property if the proposed demolition is carried out, and what effect those plans will have on the surrounding area. STAFF COMMENT: The subject structure has not been found to meet criteria for listing on the National Register as it does not meet the general 50 year requirement, nor would it be considered exceptional for those structure younger than 50 years. Further, the concrete block single-family residence could likely be reproduced at reasonable cost, and there are other examples of this type of structure within other historic districts within the city. The proposed redevelopment will likely have a positive impact on the historic district and surrounding areas. Therefore, positive findings can be made. Landscape Review The proposal includes significant landscaping improvements throughout, and the City's Senior Landscape Planner has provided the following review summary: "I have reviewed the landscape plans for the above-referenced project. The landscape and irrigation plans are in compliance with our current LDR code. The proposed landscaping will have a softening touch on the existing house and proposed additions." Therefore, positive findings can be made with respect to the landscape plan. Right-of-Way Dedication Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.1(D)(2), and the Transportation Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan, the required right-of-way width for SE 7th Avenue is 60'. Currently 40' of 244 SE 7th Avenue;COA 2009-111 HPB Meeting of April 1,2009 Page 8 of 8 right-of-way exists for SE 7th Avenue. However, the Development Services Management Group (DSMG) reviewed the application at their February 26, 2009 meeting and waived the 60' requirement, but required the right of way to expand to fifty feet (50'). Therefore, a five-foot (5') dedication (half the distance of the difference) is required, and this has been added as a condition of approval. It is noted that a revised site plan will be required showing the dedicated area, and the dedication will need to be accepted by the City Commission prior to the issuance of a building permit. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness (2009-111) for 244 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District, based on positive findings with respect to the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation subject to conditions. C. Deny the Certificate of Appropriateness (2009-111) for 244 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. (Motion to be phrased in the affirmative. See above.) RECOMMENDATION Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness (2009-111) for 244 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District, based on positive findings with respect to the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. That the 5' right of way dedication for SE 7th Avenue is accepted by the City Commission prior to the issuance of a building permit; and, 2. That the site plan is revised noting the 5' dedication. Report Prepared by:Amy E. Alvarez, Historic 're,-rvation Planner Attachments: , I • Survey / Ci)18��� r • Site Plan • Elevations 6 j • Floor Plans 19 oil,c) I • Landscape Plans "`,/{.Y /. ° V/v) r • Streetscape Elevations/Photos ) fteilL3) 1 egYrA 0,0k. ✓ta�r OF) w (.. (9391 A) lir (1,7,, ( , ,), v) I 0 • February 19,2009 City of Defray Beach Historic Preservation Board ARCHITECTS 100 NW 1st Avenue Delray Beach, Florida 33,114 STEVEN E.MYOTT,ALA 561.243.7284 JAMES rt.WILLIAMS.ALA RODOLFO C.ACEVEDO.ALA ROBERT E.VAUGHN,COO RE: Franklin Residence Historic Preservation Review Marina Historic District (Non-Contributing Structure) 244 SE 7th Avenue Dear Board Members, On behalf of our Client we would like to describe the interest and proposed development for the above property. Mr. Franklin would like to replace the existing Non-Contributing structure and replace it with his permanent residence. In doing so, the intent is to propose a structure more in-line with the requirements of the Marina District and its characteristics. Particular design criteria in relation to setbacks and building massing has been considered and applied to conform to the current Historic Preservation Guidelines as outlined in the LDR's. One challenge of this property is designing a plan that reflects the client's desire and vision with the constraints related to a corner parcel and the required setback which leaves a very limited footprint. The Vernacular inspired residence will consist of 3 floors and will stay in conformance to the LDR's height restrictions. The subject property is developed as a new structure with approximately 3279 air conditioned living space.Also incorporated in the design is a 2 car garage and a mix of covered and uncovered porches and terraces. The proposed structure will be complemented by existing courtyard pool area and low perimeter wall. Particular design elements include dynamic massing, interconnected hip roofs varying in heights and pitches,finishes that include metal roofing, hardy board, textured and smooth stucco, raised smooth stucco banding, decorative outriggers,and decorative railings.This along with metal finish detail features further adds to the architectural interpretation to the Marina District A context compatible palette of colors for the structure was selected to complement the surrounding buildings, contribute to the overall design, and adds visual interest to the streetscape setting. Thank you again for time and I look forward to your critique and comments. Re s, Rodolfo Ac vedo, AIA Design Pri cipal JMWA ARCHITECTS 949 CLINT MOORE ROAD • BOCA RATON.FLORIDA 33487 • PHONE 561 997 9997 •FAX561 997 1610 1479 SW BOUGAINVILLEA AVE. • PORT ST.LUCIE.FLORIDA 34953 • PHONE 772 879 9978 • FAx 772 879 9845 AAC002I93/160001 142-W W W.1M WA.N ET ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN The Franklin Residence City of Delray Beach Marina Historic •District Photos of Existing Structure j ".`"... �"t' ;' r `ems .-., % .'Y '" , '�a x r'.h ; - + ifs • rt�;, i t� e,.. �1 1 wt' t N ` }}� -a- ..' :.'�ye+�N1f° ', :.v t 11 %{,JIFo�.:. r�„� t 'a r�=ti. ..x" ' -,,+eg r w • f i i { . .� 3 pSA ut >� �� � r ,ms E ., - r ry �LLBnve[Aoi IIII ,, e IIi-l�mtv6ry v� - ';..fin'= t,,,rYr :' 1Y ss :. r e 244 SE 7th Ave. 244 SE 7th Ave. View From SE 3rd St. View From SE 7th Ave. VRA DCLRAY BEACH ritql ARCM IL‘r' 02-19-09 " `""``" #8403 2 F Cr 01 r. d x ly n F x , Fewd/ J o J !/W<ed Fnee N.Lop n.,"4.1 I IW 2 135 00 L... ��k ro' °- o J Shed Wmdn LLeE J / . ^' ILR... i ` `rJ. I I E d !tA a -Gene. Pgfio'-_ W a— ONE...STORYF; - O - 1,M.M Ff'EL 7.49 "'i3.:- fT�/ Op I I O zP O I =I 1- p _ C ,Si _ a.e. I•.^• z..o .. ':'.".;_:..,te l r I r i azr , GI.C/+e...Conk9 COF O.. I W I n e IG Tn M 0, / 0 ,e. h 135. / N / .— /— _—..�_—\ — — — - - S.E. 3RD STREET "Lo."Sad 51IULSON ST. — PLAT _. Yun J.MVO.!. S.C.MI AMCIL ARUI IpM,A JAIL NoTarjrn",';'4 92LN➢API—SU.CT .. ^.k d Vie" ...11°. , .2;/z/oe ^ ,.,,,, `. LOT IJ BLOCK 119 GRACEY-BYRD SUBDIVISION ,9 I, . PUT BOOK 10 PAGE 52 ..o.M.n. .. .,.wa n.. �" PALM BEACH COUNTY,FLORIDA ....,.,,.,, ,,,g^;m cArt uMN•rt.o:rc:.o NOB-11-060 i 'rK--„ ------ ---zi-.- w<>-)f- I rau arr1��t�{till l ige4 w i-----ti/ I n � � I lI ,y. i>igi'',l- M * j ''o' t i I _ il- -'.�'0 I /I I. __) ! Side setback 10'-0" Pro%osed Third Floor _ Front Setback 30'-0" tale:i!H'=1'-0' Rear Setback 10'-0" Side Street Setback 15'-0"min. c• 4�— 1lls3�Ai — _- Foot Print Length 66 0""'==-. "; Foot Print Width 25 -0 3��� TtAY Rtr • tv-r L G c.wr. ark' � 'A Proposed Second Floor Scale:118'=1'-0' -.-.�� -� 135.00 "T�-�� (�E%19TNG0 WODD FENCE . ' - ."' 7 r ' `- y,y, C' r v• W sr4 {k t r fy h< . :y 7T-0 x J r>. ,,,,, vs3 4,1c0113 �k�`!11 Z_ ; ,, O 1K ^ '2 1 I c{ �I a .-ia 1 � 4f. ft ..�f�n� -. .-, 1L i =h ,�} x 4 �j ` lC T .Q 44x E`9 { l6) EXI$7/Na Pm' x y 3.. i.Si v y N c <r Y x3 13 r 12 F► ccv wm�, -4 y '' i l W � y��YaPfbA ot �� rc V� North "ill! Z it �k 3i SAS i 4 fwSr Y .. P 4 t,C 1 q f'{ .(.'act ' {� \ s, o. .2 ♦ ,�yy J y'�'Ly a�Y, fy 4'L' r$s7X,Y`�(f I gF ✓ •t> `S hmr�em�q 5 y.,,�E- 3-''-is ', F , �v'-�c', S F i 'Y'" � S,t�,'.'''<7 v YI S. ' 43.L,- .•;ji '/v`�;v' 't�'�TCFv' Y / M i�Mll \\-----____ r k,4t,„.,�Y 5,,,:/:�, 1,,'+�'' 4;„..,,, r {;� �ji��� `v,A 11i01 -r .., i ""A.._ _ _ - P v a 1. - ��F`a� �; .i,1,4 J GV it DFIRAY RFACH 24L914'CONC.BLOCN A STUCto ' WALL W/DECOR.GP Proposed First Floor/Site Plan BANDING e � S.E. 3RD STREET 02-19-09 " ""'"°" #8403 -" 4 0isr•� _" r�ra.X+ Lai _ _ �,z. 1 wi Fusoffil 5 . 'Ct^OM 4 ; ` 411,5 Iid�l �� rw yii p6�g"'1f —11;1114•I c t 9� �• 1 1Rt1111911 1°111 v' ) 1i m 7 �ELRAYXFACH t•r I � � ? � f ' '._''"ls� t, it 1 . ..- -.' ..�.__�',. -,i trot Proposed New Front(East) Elevation- SE 7Th.Ave. Scale:1/4"=1'-0" i` RA DELRAY RFACH naaur rs 02-19-09 s • N17r4'Wfj' .{ I4' f i r g 4 { 'fi ''`. �4 e{v ———r — —fflN_i(,t It !t "Ji'0" '. ' • �e�nm� .._ v t, rwt:rx�,Y 'f t. _ S {E1 , ,y�am` t2.. ,: z •�' ' • ' ',f ar-0• fmu JrN/' ' Ili [MC � t I i'.oi y 1 �' .~`, y cntFverra q I n[IRAY BCACH € eKetN ancau % i fiiii l, Crowc,av�!uno 2 } ' wrywa-u YuCr r, :,1 � krr t AI Art.i.31 rrnt€' ,vi,v4}.1.,,r)ir; r t Proposed.New Rear(West)Efevation Scale:1/4"=1'-0" :-- w{:BRA UFCRAY BFICH. ?A/i\ ARCHI r6C75 02-19-09 " "' " #8403 6 • *54 II millidg ...„,...,,,r,,,;.: ._ ,, ... J . ,Q,„ _, - ,, , , R ■ ---- G_i$y'�1 , i ' '-- A a , ..�- ..1,,,.... .., , : F ■ ®m r d�, 'tS.®i 0 1L t.`6T'.. VY+ v, C� �k '4- b !*'6(� .iR� l ins - u°i�l�® �i` ®!I Ill lj� �!�' � — J �;� f."tGT$ ,�"?� (14. ;oc'� Y� Si '� ®® 1ill ■ ;fit = .. i. ,j• 1 1 4'i1^. ry•x' IFOl��7II1�1 I. ".' .tl t a �I - l�p�I.% u Y. , . •"..i• ',' ?- 7 d , , : , se. f� �I I �y„,....., i 1 4 I �, .t.,,,,,, ! .,..,, F. A4LEY. _Avila i� �■{ A, k . , 'Yy k— ',TWVrAtil, yiff-14 JAW Proposed New Side (South) Elevation-SE 3rd. St. Scale:3/16"=1'-0" iirdkalmiA,,,,,,irip ntLRA1 M* I 1/91 40M ICRA DELRAY REACH Wil ® A 11 0.C111 f!li) "02-19-09 "`"""'""` #8403 y ]-11 lig .'y ..6r-.=cry.-a-,�,lr........ ,. .. ,..... �,, br�'n^" 4.- ,a• - 'E' =: 1 111 is +kn ��>.}i7�� a �: „? T fir * -, - �a „ -—. / ;,�11: cnS nM�c nu lP Jun O M rf t f'4W:71GC�hfafA �I ii r �7 l i.i .I' `^(Wtik�J(IYtY _ �.I 1!0 1 l �. itPcuN 4.ut_N Gft,� '.�. ._ f } j f t I �� it * ALLEY i'. ors, Via, �: . e .rr I* 1,74_ 1 fte `- 'fil�fiY�O tv.�tYa57 _mm — Proposed New Side (North) Elevation -SE 3rd. St. Scale:3/16"=1'-0" DELRAYBEAp i� BRA OFtRARCAY RFACH 8 -, _II M TILTS :21 02-19-09 "' "°" #8403 • ...: -'3, 'hz zy[ a a yvr rs. } ;. ...; .. ., U `a. ,. *Pw+'s.a..ar�'^"w�"ewvm. +.iw +t».�w +rai+y" :,per �1 , c.' �,7• r,2 arrw•,,�, ,,1, �;�eyt.n t ,� �, z�r,.; a ".,T ,.i 7 3 r ..,,1„,t +t 'he x r .. ,-4 u 3 •g f?. .4 s. �.s .W.wti '"'.. ,d { 'i i, :: `a ' t . • 1 -,f ut ,' „ f� 'i �i .'��: " !... _ ..�i is dE�{ :Yi d' t {, !' Ya.. / 1 T N yrt 'c *, 1. r, ; "z b . :,. ti ��2 z.: ."- �i P !;�i.A.A 1 of Y,.}t '.4.$ +,Err v �b�` • �s�, ,'•, Pk".r ,.,fir " r,.,,v .�� t c,..,, ,.s: ' '�,r :: 1 :.r a.r L IRI{{{r r:,'ys'4' t� 'I1 f,, ",74't-a ...,;1 r.' i. .4 $4 .t. - R ,„ ;,--",�'r - ` .; j�^'r ,r '. S 4,,,;0 .•1!.' ;1'. a t". ���' ej��f`�*"� '�• `, �"' 1p�.4,f •{�I'". �'.l: r,.y.., �.t4-; �N+£,�i�" �f`'x+fD`��1;' I � �� •„!_/'4 +.s �'" '� � VyF. "'! � .q ,� dYlb,.., . ". �, '+>)5!�- .. L t �11:-.: ,..,4411.t..tit-iii,i,lifitl,413/4!iiiiki„,i {: r `rs tif- :.f� Z' f .}' f?ti,� is = :it::' y • L r ,, .,� a` ' .} �r. , .. ---sitililpiiiiiiir, ate �,s :,.............., .. . , '� `,, C M. R ':'4.i, r!,. ,L„,....�c 'r. .. : ,ss l't1i.`31g. .. : 71�1' / i' {"4'1�}N.1(�r1I ^1(:� r-vco- a, i:� c A% ... �. 1 4 ut ra +! .!� } l� �tp'�•>t 2i�'L , . ......„ , „..., Streetscaoe View Front SE 7th.Ave. f4LR10 ALAC74ALAO! f �1E/_ 11111 1993 21Xq LRA DELRAY BEACH MI WA ARCl11i F1'i> r'v 02-19-09 """'""'`" #8403 9 REVISITNS BY 2 EXISTING CBS II ' I / STRUCTURE „' �+h 1JSA0' sr Awns Es it I.>wla. _ S u}, R,,, i��' . '�.4;'I� C,, k`e,, Z N a ill` I 71 '1' k a s�' o II— PROPOSE°3STORY i �J `,kl tO.„ /'\� _ 0 V gr = o1 I CBS STRUCTURE � 4- `` /,(�� ~ COI LL L — — — J ; im Y Cams."Tw. I id N V 5 J _ „,,. CO ro ,y/ Ci •CE ui J L_\ n n Rawl`n.� A\ S.E.3RD STREET IC d - I I Sp So.Palm SIC ccMI ,Imam•n o,R.A schema. CL I I p C L RELOCATION NOTES; nb•bnomu....r..a.enbcwam e.pho,•nbG'aolcrun.foe•eMnum MD Room prb.le N• 0I •— : LL 11M ma dab b.aOA toe wil d.p•nd on e.e dp.r alba tdabui to to b.robaM1471m.b of Na rua foal shage••e.maw N.wOON l wools ma Nal M Ya..Irx4dlne. U S.N red Oa Nal be—damnwa—.ad B.boa.malarial dal b woe trd.d Obi*sok or po.uppn.Mqua/Aire/4mct.and uNlasIwV 8 Nabbb shall be removal from=NON.te.. I d = d A.empw.Thbebn anol b•pnnb•d m A rea.pn•.o Re.e duhl e.moW.iry Powo,end•ae de eerie,ere been rebaMdb Nelbabn for a H months.a se mass. Joa,on Nat N l� CO S.D.nap.k,al.l u..t.Aal a.d.ad Ssa RNn,m of ant w i.•ama pnany v O.Nwvbe•i Nal be rd a'.N.M...di.O lla.non•.toNond bead,so.p•de,>motel capable dlio M•ma NC..d matooi wy Da!'.oNMLw.TA•LandsLandscapeNIm m Landscape Nat. oaopva N 146 a L T.nno...Nagar!fir.Ne nbabn process. J T.N nbabn wort sbol'>'^W MR N•Nabnal Morita Standards. NORTH REMOVAL NOTES: I +YT' mewelramrodIrmo N be d NNE es a mtl 1. .0Y0/e nov son Ne JacB.,met RN.,of N mmdbW wua b ammy*,LAS., . • .mlarl..Nah nrev4a m aJal.Eol w. oa..RNA sysLnneal sh inuwoundde vall be a nin of BIN d•ets end•a fool danv woDate. B.TREE REMOVAL PERNTTS Nil BE RCOUPED BY THE GOVERMUNICIPALITYNIMUNICIPALITYAND IT SHALL BE IRE CONTRACTORS RESPONSITIBEY TO OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS. ALL UIDERGROUNO UTBITES SHALL BE LOCATED PRIOR TO reir COWAN..ANY WORK OH THE SITE.PCR;LORIA LAW. Tree Removal & Relocation Plan L-1 c. 4 • I. 40 • a I REVISIONS BY • SITE DATA,RESIDENTIAL - -/ EXISTING CBS % A.Tula bt area D,y50SRY. ,w_r / STRUCTURE / B.SIucMea,oerdq.wels,ddee tbVenbms) 3.3855en �/,f.7 / / C.Total perdous area(QA.B) 3.38USen W= ////////////////////////////// o.Areem trees see ground cover(Remhaa0-c.20) DTosa.n. bhee p.Se cF ke Vases se iF1 pp A E.Maorlreer,ahrubeapmund wwnrpnbed 3,5855Rn icC H ! Rxepe a.M al al 47 09 A F.Nol.e vegetal.required CF.U,15) 1885e.e. �-„„ VT V _ .m 0, o.NeMvwo•blbnorvs.d t158en /0 135.OV ^ FL Tow number of edsao trees 1Tree �/ I.: �.���� L Tow number d reeled trees B'A-3501.1.k1 3 Trees IIIIMh_ rri,..,. .,,.)q).m....,,i,, r Ndasi®1'a'isia.,„„, 4,.,— W J.Tow number of Sees embed("A•any a Way.?eves) 11 Trees �0 ff 2 rtwe<d _ �r Twvvr nor una un Aylo�m1' .1,1 K.Tow number of�wM been ni.(50%ofmph d) xTreee �/ d. rdrp, � out .. ,a::}€a�. •: b�C1 i f ,+•:". ,�,� �.;E��1 Teti number et note rasa poblea Stress Nl V (_ • , , © IW Qoc' ' ' }Y trq,., Any Trees or ahiubs pbmdrdhb water,sews.or aralna0e ��yy 3 V I ��(. \ 'C y � ��\ Q easements shal conform to the City of Delray Beach Standard W W n 3.f.i i t• . �1; ,{ MIA' @ Delray L.0.1.1 8LD.12 revukemnb.(S.Data.Sheer L5) ID�.d.8 O bb. PROPOSED 3-STORY �� /1)4 I;�,` U/,�i,PB b = p • R CBS STRUCTURE k =}j 1 t"„` 5��� I— w W r A II \Q a — — J II tk' \� � co WQZi CD 0 yArk m �Ita. c :,''.mac@ w © `s war ww,, / � to la ; n,,,e i. S.E.3RD STREET �,. ^ti C raornr — a re C l0 C . [D Z NOTE:64hlTM1anOk6 Shall Provide to T s� 0 Unobstructed CrosebiHry At A Level Between (.......... i:K •C it 3 Feel And 6 Feel betiding Trunks. FO�min DetaIIM D� .siOt O Sca-� 2 C N I N N m i 2 C 3 ILI o NORTH D.H.C.0 ....... w e tin▪e 1CS. L Landscape Plan R 42 „.,„a REVISEDNS BY r",Mnrh.crn. ,e.T.,3n�bat.3•1.• ®3GI Ton 370.3v. .,..,i•.xO,w•m.•.... AM aJ.e ...Coo..M14it.b.aw 0 mv4.r.Q,3w.a ie i. .•..M pro...a.. n•amb, ... AIir..•b.•i.i.•n be•L..ba.MMba,•...Y.J. P.,‘,1,4 wno M.k.n3~ W..,.........w1.w.•*1 W Z 'ry.:1...h+.J..:.e.o. s.,....t..ewws.c.+r / EXISTING CBS s•..••«tw..xw1•.. / I . STRUCTURE / H bM •..... 3.•..wa•.0..."...nY.1y la ++..i.•ud e.w.».i....•s...«W.•6a... vJ•af O�•.•A T,.•..VW.wu.MlH,be.wr•do.v,vn....rb«M•Job I A. Ll'I m b.........ne3�•>..v.«...9...3bhM III p . ..I Z ,edQ O.ca ..r..«.,:.e......w..3a.w.......�...e. .��Jy/ (''. 1 ��Y`�( wan W m d. w 1•«.w•,..+.\b Wi».•...w vw.•, 1. '•' ^�\ I Qul w.kJ •.n rr..Nn.W1.•r•NJ...1r»•.., \ 1ba.v...»....... I ., z 33' '�� .. \��« I Q W W Ca Q.�pW.bx..r.....•"a.Nw�w.y.u.w...s... 3 ? !y firR1 Z FM N n R Nµ aa.Ni...cv..ro 3,dm.«w...J.a.e IIPROPOSED}STORY �J ,, $ _ 0Ce ....•...u.... „„ ,� Nrw of CBS STRUCTURE 1'1 H•>a+J•e •w m•aM.n.es• ad.J M' h Y , W ryw.�bn.r aJ.ua.u.J..e.n..••• i I r..ova x \ y y_ I„ O Ciw. oi ,tlNMr wwt.r..•..1...a..o.w r',ca.JWA r6.N L J �. •Ii�h\ ',' 1,�y -Az..., I I W „ ••..rune..WRMua.m bJ cr.n rb M=.at .� eCl flee 0 ▪ rare.vb3a�..rM«..J..1».rb>'rl..e.S+3L ntcroem 86 ig�i I t��_ �{ —�.Yh 1� inz owepyr6eb.n.e.......•,r....a.bl b..n4Jue"..+► rsvJ• la ill , � I ./ N rob. uoa'Ao a•.1r1•w...•.rxo.. �� mmn rNR>r.bo<cr. Lam— - _ _ _ _ .. Sbr.n.•a w eo.nid b•p.m.a »..+.,.«•n bM —t— l O c,.�•.n 11••0•J•w e•rn3N•Aawnbb e.I.lilan..z wla NM 3a-.M iM'. j •.U.r.r¢Ir1.J w, 1 CC N]Cxur.0:bow. w.i•Ni1.'n•"3•w.•n••+»te yi. W�i — — — — — — — — — — — • wM. •.e=��•»m.» . S.E.3RD STREET c 3 3 rt•.••••..,...b..l.sd•ea...J.v..•..a.. a C -o 3:.I...And..,*d.b r•iw.•.•»1v„ea O) — O .1.Mp I+rw3....,J.1ww.0,1e....,,conra.4r I = l!. .4..•••a.••.w bn...,»a••••b...•.n.•r.e.11.v U R. •pNM.N...ybm•:Y we•»ri1M•.+.e u b..xrs a (5 CO wNe...y.Co-..ev..br•e.rnbr.....e...».w Uais T Mirb�3,3Ry CO CO ,..,•.«»•....•1, ....... E i C n..bt.:•w.,..:a:".b•.r.kd$.1«H.x•w..+.. NORTH uw..e...0.n.•.a»O.•wax.......».ns.bb.►a»n... ..n .+.1N i.ci.u.,.e....w.J•.a 4 ..i .nas•x....m..• 9J wm.•ei W«ewe.....N•.Mnbo-lr#a...r......a.eo.. D.H.C. L .ewe•1...3.aw.....xw••n...rn.,....•....•.,•. I bM N.,aa+1h Ile wee A... va Irrigation Plan r L43 .x.e,. 41_,....) • I 410 REVISIHS BY COMM.LONSICAPP Porn N*n tore..SA.r 1.11.or boner..per re.1..eYe d II.Mrs..wmr•e./J F J.•RtM.Oak.•u.e.e 4lw ro Unborn.%dom.wPrnrmerri.%or...r N i• � JweoFMq 6r 5...rbOawdamn Ob..•netroV W,l.V omit d Soy.M1 mot Ste%.dean Groundmven Shrubs rw tint 1*..%.4 w 1.tad.m•Minn d r on Wet a\loon r net wh o•wa.Mr I. groom,ono%•rlw Fniel 4m•r..vm on WWI red Pi.Padre.Mgr ... Ind.o.M WI•..Mor err elan.)Wm waned lm Os Pp P of M•.Ip rp..wl -= CS omr.d mowo rdr.M.w I.4ri.•%rano,.era..Or% y ..N..r mood.Irrem d41..owe le a oow.•.ear n.Jarwn,n em•r.rw.r.n •eetbn yTam.o.oR>,0ll.rnl.a...prase k..rol 44....P. _ W= T. tan.e.Vow...Lae dP.pa.reM dd.T M.Den.dv N den.gws. F loofa"Wed drone..upon en...ddw.e r.n..wr<h OATorrrot.•.r 'e"met CO! Od▪e*.O.be pOntor µl-r..nP..b.,Pnw.mow. y !— rbrr«dI>OM %rev`nw{aabM.. ... .. a P—r. ...or',Alm A..i .�...,we.._.n `l ��a.. (r, m re P:..:.d6.•M c� dram•� v..eMt•Plow\�M�wlMdt_WbslwWnNa..rwrw 4,-,,...eta We��'..'_'....r'�'•....._.n�ee` w'�• —Ili •�.An~ r...r« O c .a rear a owner .eaF an.....4rp miler.... ma.4 •C=1:1.�::-.—,=._.. Dp,� .e,rrn.. .... «. Ronan.• or.. R � 5/ _ — _ N V...Sin..., Ian Irnd4 ro, grow*e.oatWs.M+4 n.•n•.�.w._r.._. r • ..� d.a:,....:.-r..:..:. OTC.MEC WO ROOT DAPPER ID%I ill _ .n. w«_ a= % ap•h FM4nane• IWOn�p.4i•u•1 tor wmpe•N.oar.4 dray.,. .. Ymrw_rrr.w1 , N•ad+rar+%wn•:rrt .dHaP4.vwrm.�.n...•w.w ..Pr'. I I! j:W W,�e mob. .or Aearwn.s.l.nr...wmr.ed•rd..,m. rIrOoLlLueiw r.dn.b•ern d TM.y wn lw.oFnoan e.w Wt. w«r 3y MCI��� - •"• w� m M Q.o �w�4..F%aloe PMe1..4, dl a 111, ? ❑— 1R..en,.n..wd...a,end....4......,....«n,..na.era,..,e4roore w W V Q_ • m44.e.pre s—...a+nor*wtr..w..r.«r.-.sHr Z F y c,p d\m;rP ..i Mrs rwr.+W Forme,+FA.Ai or doom... :�:vov..w• te'•"^ .yP Y' o.Rnay.a.ni M M.e...«rn.i%neve my.r.VP.%Mwe Rob. .r•.w..r E. si iFa �~ 0 CC CI IJ n ISnno..lerti 0000..1.1..nP..Fmsrr.ow., ter.n."-"'mn Straight Trunk Pdrm Q Z 4y-....b w 4M 1 e,.orae p.en.Par From Mt.ew•rdpwa. Treeskl _ ❑ MATERIAL SCHEDULE 411) ty. cry Plonk.!'Common Morro S. U kP i..Cndr.I Demon Hcty INS' V UJixtru2Mrd*rMp4M Ice 12.10'nK 5.1om Plpd Moe,*Ro,P.kra Prymy d•te pdmt$F. P'-Tpe.Triple P melandW ocMw4111) Cr. Coco.Pam PM Ort.PJt Coconut pt 1630 ]JWC Pm Reece,Roebek.k Pygmy dole Pdn 6'-Tw•dgH Pep, U.m.M Pohl.,SLVRJ Mao BWnPrk Palm 10.12b.. II 12 Le bar•mut red/Redlnn 15'0.52'oc — —I U y 120 Q lkremapnJ Omen N,M ku 1e•OB.515'oc — w _I P Deed Durant,Erxb Seppµe.lveen 1}le]p{020'0e w, 50 Ce-r Coomqu erect,Cm trnwod 15'0224.3p420c. — - C W 24 CY hors mat yob*l Yellow ken 157042. M Er, Eagm.a myr,.A,l Eugenia 33-Iba.lp. �~ N CC 25 Dal Dbne4b•mPrka4lwhm 4x M 15-183g021ac .e�a_.r.•. _...nrr•rwr..•p Q e0 ErM Etchwbb ap./MAW* 15-1e71.01e•pc ....r..Patio 1 Bp10 llagalr.i,a* 6, a0..rod C%Tat Pn,wl SOARER. RER l0,.1 C CO OS Wm Wife CSuh,d Rod .Cu.Yore!. 'jJN = T Actin..or WO.pieced.tar enter....ere dabs°, O •.E.SA,oN.,apllray emwm bk,asl .Ml.lo1n.p.Ety. d NI,Botch sums. �� plan,marerlelc.Per BAYHD.,.krapeu.nud'• 0.9 L0.1.1 a lJ;la reeaen•... •E !L P11y..i.aa*225*.red.pea p- U 25,4.2,tee detain.M.pen Sod.Soil pknbm.'Nemaw Emple 2ryi•as rec.ane N C m T U N 2 J ❑ D.H.C.PCP MOUS Notes & Details L-4 Or 4 Morro HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD April 1, 2009 MEETING COMMENCED: 6:05 P.M. IV.A. NAME ATTEND COA 244 SE 7th Avenue VOTE 5 to 0 w/1 more condition The foam brackets to be replaced with wood ROGER COPE P JOANNE PEART P TOM STANLEY A T DEL FIANDRA P DAN SLOAN P Made Motion RHONDA SEXTON P Seconded MEETING ADJOURNED: 7:00 P.M. Add to Motion: Comprises the approval of the demolition of the existing single-family residence and the construction of a new single-family residence for 244 Condition No. 3 The foam brackets to be replaced with wood HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD April 1, 2009 MEETING COMMENCED: 6:05 P.M. IV.A. NAME ATTEND COA 244 SE 7th Avenue VOTE 5 to 0 w/1 more condition The foam brackets to be replaced with wood ROGER COPE P JOANNE PEART P TOM STANLEY A T DEL FIANDRA P DAN SLOAN P Made Motion RHONDA SEXTON P Seconded MEETING ADJOURNED: 7:00 P.M. Add to Motion: Comprises the approval of the demolition of the existing single-family residence and the construction of a new single-family residence for 244 Condition No. 3 The foam brackets to be replaced with wood HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD April 1, 2009 MEETING COMMENCED: 6:05 P.M. IV.A. NAME ATTEND COA 244 SE 7th Avenue VOTE 3,y) ROGER COPE JOANNE PEART TOM STANLEY T DEL FIANDRA v\ DAN SLOAN RHONDA SEXTON MEETING ADJOURNED: P.M. C7'LLi/ t Qom, .2 ✓,, ,amZeerx T p /re►lPoi v ifi / •`) L3 --A71e-7 6-CI /N--Qf v`' 71 104 rdr.- ,er / h s-—1 ----/-ce/ -2---7_, 4( 2) --7 cR ha,,,,L---- 19 I / 1e( 9 /, , \ Q- a &i- cL42, ' ..2)-+ Lf-11-- (--c• .(ic2.04- 4 reaci),AJJ r / ` d ) `' (45 4\ c'Y'L. - / , I ,De.60 ,___34 Tab ____.c. .. � �i � V [ iJ . CP� lax 9 . 0 / . L 54 6-3(; f 00/, eom CV7 -. (29/(citet"a -mth Y-19 ---- _ / 0 -. (Li) ,,u dz aLe, ) to es:) • /( ))9 ()1 L -yf) (,-1/6'22 ; 0,,ot. (+41 cam / U14:14) ,c/ P'144e ( ) ?' / a6&_, } /c. _ 6Qapt\ i2 er , /2 Cv/4 9 + e,;;14 /46 "IL9 pi,CA (/' e___-4( WC) (J )1VLf 1/-5T j t.- � r Ye* 9- 12iL 0 P r )-ot-e,& � � -7��/ • ocAdo Wlaiy ceo,. pav ' fr 4//0/--- / 7 in 4-7 ) /w7161L 41 Ng r• II if Oktietr _----il-A ___-(-_____--0/ - !'" 2,74,, ,/-- /'e 7 . ) 71 /- 4.42-t--:7-v,,c,) _, ? ____Iir- „ Y l v 7 ) -- t) 721/it a)i ,--- ----- :: _ wi_cui den, 4 J ) , _ (7' ' - AA ) r 1 7 ° :r ' ,./ / ,1 0 1 C.p.,1 ,0C ,