The URL can be used to link to this page

HPB-09-16-09 AGENDA �44 � HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD Meeting Date: September 16, 2009 Time: 6:00 P.M. Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: City Commission Chambers The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service,program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Smith at 243-7144 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing,such persons will need a record of these proceedings,and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Two or more City Commissioners may be in attendance. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA IV. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS A. Consideration of a City-Initiated Ordinance 15-09, acceptance of the resurvey report for the Del- Ida Park Historic District including extending the Period of Significance and reclassifying properties from non-contributing to contributing. V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS • Public Comments • Board Members • Staff VI. ADJOURN am* & attemerz Amy E. Alvarez Historic Preservation Planner Posted on: September 11, 2009 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD September 16, 2009 MEETING COMMENCED: 6:0 P.M. IV.A. NAME ATTEND Ord. 15-09 Resurvey/ /Dell-IIda-Park Historic District VOTE J A�= r ROGER COPEIP° PAM REEDER TOM STANLEY T DEL FIANDRA 92 923 Vb° RHONDA SEXTON 4 DAN SLOAN Absent MEETING ADJOURNED: P.M. HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD September 16, 2009 MEETING COMMENCED: 6:05 P.M. IV.A. NAME ATTEND Ord. 15-09 Resurvey Del-Ida Park Historic District VOTE PASSED 4 TO 1 ROGER COPE P YES PAM REEDER P NO TOM STANLEY P YES T DEL FIANDRA P MADE MOTION YES RHONDA SEXTON P SECONDED YES DAN SLOAN Absent MEETING ADJOURNED: 9:00 A.M. DELRAY BEACH F i u All-America Cit1993 2001 SIGN IN SHEET 2001 Regular Historic Preservation Board Meeting September 16, 2009 PRINT FULL NAME ADDRESS OR ITEM NO. ORGANIZATION t:› v) 6f1C 7` -iJ ' 17 fir, f 134-any K1�,. "yz b' S + 6fin Pm L u tu►l'e(L 1Ki • p HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT MEETING OF: September 16, 2009 ITEM: CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE 15-09 TO ACCEPT THE RESURVEY REPORT OF DEL-IDA PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT INCLUDING EXTENDING THE PERIOD OF SIGNIFICANCE AND RECLASSIFYING PROPERTIES FROM NON- CONTRIBUTING TO CONTRIBUTING. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is that of making a recommendation to the City Commission regarding Ordinance 15-09 which provides for the acceptance of the resurvey report of Del-Ida Park Historic District, including extension of the Period of Significance (POS), and reclassifying properties from Non- Contributing to Contributing, pursuant to Land Development Regulations (LDR) Section 4.5.1(N), Criteria for Change of Historic Classification and 4.5.1(0), Procedures for Change of Historic Classification. BACKGROUND The City hired RJ Heisenbottle Architects, Inc. to conduct a survey of the Del-Ida Park, Nassau Park, Old School Square, and West Settlers Historic Districts from July 2008 — January 2009. The objective was to survey all properties developed at least thirty-five years ago within each district and to identify those which contain both Contributing and Non-Contributing buildings and structures. A historical overview of each area was provided in the final report. The City Commission reviewed the recommendations of the final survey report for the Del-Ida Park Historic District at its workshop on February 10, 2009 and supported Staffs proposal to move forward and process the acceptance of the resurvey. The final survey report to be adopted is for the Del-Ida Park Historic District. The final survey report recommendations are as follows: • That the Period of Significance (POS) be expanded to 1970, which would reclassify 48 properties from Non-Contributing to Contributing. The current POS spans through to 1943. See Appendix A for those properties recommended for reclassification. • That listing on the National Register of Historic Places be sought for the entire district. Following are details regarding the Period of Significance and listing on the National Register of Historic Places: Period of Significance The resurvey report notes that the POS for the Del-Ida Park Historic District should be extended to 1970, based on the historical and architectural significance of the Post World War II period in the development of Del-Ida Park. The POS extension would reclassify 48 properties currently classified Non-Contributing to Contributing, which were constructed from 1944-1965. Ordinance 15-09; Del-Ida Park Historic District Resurvey HPB Meeting September 16,2009; Page 2 of 8 National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) Listing on the NRHP would provide additional recognition for the district, but it should be noted that additional review criteria or restrictions would not be placed on properties located within the boundary. Additional explanation of NRHP listing is provided below. Ordinance 15-09 includes Attachment A, which is the Final Survey Report for the Del-Ida Park Historic District, and Attachment B, which notes each property and its date of construction, historic classification, and architectural style. At its April 15, 2009 meeting, the HPB reviewed and tabled the subject item until their June 17, 2009 meeting with the following direction given to Staff: 1. That an analysis be conducted regarding extending the POS to 1970, while only reclassifying those structures built through 1959 (later referred to as Alternative 2); and, 2. That an analysis be conducted to extend the POS only to 1959 (as opposed to 1970) (later referred to as Alternative 3). The requested analyses are provided in the "Analysis" section of this report where a comparison is provided between the survey recommendations (Alternative 1) and the two scenarios requested by the Board as noted above (Alternatives 2 and 3). Consideration of Ordinance 15-09 is now before the Board for review and recommendation to the City Commission. REVIEW LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Pursuant to LDR Section 2.2.6(A), a Historic Preservation Board for the City of Delray Beach is hereby created. The purpose of this Board is to foster and promote the recognition, protection, enhancement and use of historic resources in the City of Delray Beach and to have a lay body which shall have authority to act on matters pertaining to historic preservation. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.2.6(D)(1), Duties, Powers, and Responsibilities, the Historic Preservation Board shall develop, maintain, and update a survey of archaeological sites, properties, buildings, structures, and districts of special historic, aesthetic, architectural, cultural, or social value or interest. The Board will endeavor to improve, expand, and make more accurate the survey as additional documents, information, oral histories, and other such materials may become available, and it will periodically reevaluate the survey. The Board will work with the City Historical Society, the State Bureau of Historic Preservation, and other appropriate public and nonprofit organizations in maintaining this survey. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.2.6(D)(2), Duties, Powers, and Responsibilities, the Historic Preservation Board shall nominate properties for designation, and regulate such properties, structures, buildings, sites, districts, and the like so designated as historic sites and/or historic districts. STAFF COMMENT: The LDRs specify that as part of the HPB duties, the Board shall protect historic resources, and update surveys of historic resources. The resurvey of the Del-Ida Park Historic District complies with this requirement. Ordinance 15-09; Del-Ida Park Historic District Resurvey HPB Meeting September 16,2009; Page 3 of 8 LDR Section 4.5.1(N), Criteria for Change of Historic Classification (1) A survey of all historic districts may be conducted by the City every five (5) years. The survey report may recommend changes to the historic designation and/or classification of properties located within or immediately adjacent to a designated historic district. (b) Criteria for Change of Historic Classification: If a City-initiated survey conducted within the last five (5) years reveals that a property within a historic district should be reclassified as either Contributing or non-Contributing, then the classification may be revised in accordance with LDR Section 4.5.1(0) and shall be determined as follows: 1. The survey recommends the inclusion of an additional "Period of Significance", which would reclassify properties from non-Contributing to Contributing, or; 2. The survey recommends that a property or properties have been so significantly altered that the changes are irreversible and have compromised the structures historic integrity of the structure, which would reclassify the structure from Contributing to non-Contributing. STAFF COMMENT: The subject survey meets the criteria for change of historic classification as it was conducted within the last 5 years (complete January 2009), and the survey recommends that the Period of Significance be adopted which would reclassify 48 properties from Non-Contributing to Contributing, per the survey recommendation. Therefore, the reclassifications of the properties listed in Exhibit A are eligible for review. It is noted that additional resources are recommended for reclassification by Staff. These resources are further analyzed below. LDR Section 4.5.1(0), Procedures for Change of Historic Designation and/or Classification (2) Procedures for Change of Historic Classification: Applications to change the historic classification of a property or properties within a historic district shall be made to the Historic Preservation Board and may be initiated by written request of: (a) The Historic Preservation Board based upon the recommendations of a City-initiated survey completed within five (5) years prior to the application; or (b) The City Commission based upon the recommendations of a City-initiated survey completed within five (5) years prior to the application; or (3) The Planning and Zoning Director or his/her designee shall conduct a preliminary evaluation of the information provided on each application to determine if it generally conforms with criteria in LDR Section 4.5.1(N)(1). The Planning and Zoning Director or his/her designee shall then prepare a report which shall contain the following: (b) Change of Historic Classification: 1. Analysis of the properties to be reclassified; and 2. A staff recommendation as to whether or not the properties should be reclassified due to either: a. loss of historic integrity as a result of irreversible alterations to a Contributing property; or b. inclusion of an additional "Period of Significance"per the survey recommendations. STAFF COMMENT: Period of Significance & Reclassifications It has been determined that the subject request conforms with Section 4.5.1(N)(1), and the recommendations have been justified within the report with respect to the expansion of the POS to 1970. The information has been provided and reviewed by Staff and deemed to be complete. It should be noted that the date of construction for 251 Dixie Boulevard has been corrected via the • Ordinance 15-09: De!-Iva Park Historic District Resurvey HPB Meeting September 16,2009; Page 4 of 8 resurvey, as it was found to be a 1920s structure and not the 1950s structure it was thought to be when the district was designated in 1988. There were modifications to the Mission-style structure in the 1950s, and the survey now notes this property to be a Mission/Contemporary style. Page 8 of the Del- Ida Park final survey report recognizes and compliments the "transformation" of the structure from Mission to Contemporary style. In 2008, the HPB approved a demolition of this structure, and it was reviewed as a non-contributor. The demolition occurred earlier this year. The properties recommended for reclassification by RJ Heisenbottle Architects, Inc, were initially developed between 1944 and 1965 and are a part of the historic Del-Ida Park streetscape. While these structures may differ from the architectural styles of Del-Ida Park's initial development, they are compatible and illustrate the development building typologies of their time. It is important to note that the"Period of Significance" identifies the growth periods of a historic district and places the POS within its historical context. Therefore, extension of the POS to 1970 rather than 1965 when the last remaining eligible structure was built, includes the entire Post-WWII development impact on Del-Ida Park, and may recognize those appropriate improvements made to contributing structures during this timeframe. Staff's analysis of the resurvey recommendations are provided below. ANALYSIS RESURVEY RECOMMENDATIONS The following gives a comparison of the three potentially different alternatives the Board may choose to support based on the request from the April 15, 2009 meeting. However, Staff has provided an additional alternative for Board consideration. The POS, justification, and analysis for Alternative 4 are included below. Period of Significance Reclassified Properties Alternative 1 1970 48 Alternative 2 1970 38 Alternative 3 1959 38 Alternative 4 1965 48 Justification Alternative 1: The following contains excerpts from the resurvey report: "...lt was not until the end of World War I1 that Del-Ida Park experienced a new surge in construction. During the immediate post-war era, Delray Beach saw a marked increase in population,...Del-Ida Park was an attractive middle-class suburban community, centrally located and reasonably priced. Many new houses went up at this time, modest in scale, but representative of the latest trends in architectural design, materials and technology. There are many fine examples of Contemporary Style houses that were built during the post World War II building construction surge in Del-Ida Park...These houses were not 50 years old at the time when the Del-Ida Park Historic District was designated, therefore not meeting the age threshold to be considered as contributing structures. It is, however, RJHA's strong recommendation that these houses should be recognized and officially listed as contributing buildings in the Designation Report, for their historical and architectural significance as representative examples of Post-War Era design. The Del-Ida Park Historic District Designation Report, approved in 1988, places the Period of Significance cut-off date by which structures are to be evaluated at 1943. The cut-off date is r Ordinance 15-09; Del-Ida Park Historic District Resurvey HPB Meeting September 16,2009; Page 5 of 8 based in the generally accepted 50 year old threshold for considering eligibility of structures for listing as "contributing"within a designated historic district. In terms of historical and architectural development, it is difficult to justify this date under any other criteria than the 50 year threshold. The post World War II era was a significant period in the historic and architectural development of Delray Beach. There was a marked population increase,...As a result, Delray Beach saw a period of growth...and therefore an increase in demand for housing...Del-Ida Park remained an attractive neighborhood, affordable and conveniently close to downtown...(report) discussed the architectural significance of the Contemporary Style housing built during this era. Many of the structures that RJHA has identified and recorded for the first time as part of this Resurvey Project date from 1963-1965...(10 NE 5th Street) is part of a block-long cohesive group built during that time period... Extend the Period of Significance to 1970, based on the historical and architectural significance of the Post World War II period in the development of Del-Ida Park." The justification provided above by the City's Consultant was a result of extensive research including the City's records, the Delray Beach Historical Society's records, and field surveys. Alternatives 2 and 3: These alternatives were requested by the Board in response to owners of properties containing structures built after 1959 and who voiced their opposition to the reclassifications at the HPB meeting of April 15, 2009. Alternative 4 Staff's proposal of Alternative 4 is provided See Staff's Analysis of the 4 alternatives below. Analysis Alternative 1: Alternative 1 has been provided in the resurvey report which was prepared by a qualified professional knowledgeable in historic preservation, architectural history, and historic site surveys, among other qualifications. As a result of extensive research on the Del-Ida Park Historic District, a recommendation was made to extend the POS to 1970 and that those eligible and qualifying structures (48) are reclassified as contributing to the historic district. The justification of the POS extension to 1970 illustrates the time frame of the Post VWVII impact on Del-Ida Park, not necessarily by the most recent construction date (1965) of a structure recommended for contributing classification. Based on the justification noted in the report (also noted above) and additional information and analysis provided below for Alternative 4, the Board may not find it appropriate to adopt the recommended POS extension to 1970. Alternative 2: Alternative 2 would extend the POS to 1970, and reclassify 38 properties constructed through 1959. Support for the subject alternative would arbitrarily omit eligible resources constructed in a decade in the noted POS and compromise any future attempts at recognizing those structures built in Del-Ida Park after 1959 as significant. Those eligible structures built in the 1960s are of the Contemporary and Ranch styles, both of which are representative of styles constructed in the 1950s. The following is an explanation of the importance of the Contemporary Style, as provided in the resurvey report: Ordinance 15-09; Del-Ida Park Historic District Resurvey . HPB Meeting September 16,2009; Page 6 of 8 "There are many fine examples of Contemporary Style houses that were built during the post World War II building construction surge in Del-Ida Park. These houses are inspired by the International Style that originated in Europe and later traveled to the United States,... Contemporary style houses in Del-Ida Park have simple, clean lines, highly abstracted, geometric designs and are mostly devoid of any applied decoration. One of the most important features of these buildings is their complete break with traditional, historical models. They rely on massing, new materials and methods of construction and sculptural forms for architectural expression. Most of the houses have flat roofs with broad eaves, may have glass jalousie windows and often an attached carport. These houses were not 50 years old at the time when the Del-Ida Park Historic District was designated, therefore not meeting the age threshold to be considered as contributing structures. It is, however, RJHA's strong recommendation that these houses should be recognized and officially listed as contributing buildings in the Designation Report, for their historical and architectural significance as representative examples of Post-War Era design." As a general note, it is important to consider that while these styles may exist throughout the City as a whole, there is not a large concentration of any single style within any of the City's five historic districts. Therefore, the protection of any of the eligible resources is important in maintaining the historic environment of each district. Based on the emphasis provided in the report (also noted above) on the Contemporary-style and significance of Post-WWII development subsequent to 1959, the Board may find that it would not be appropriate to adopt the recommended POS extension to 1970, while reclassifying 38 structures built through 1959, and omitting the 10 identified structures built between 1960 and 1965. Alternative 3: Alternative 3 would extend the POS to 1959 and reclassify 38 properties constructed through 1959. Revising a POS to the end of a decade for the sake of omitting structures built subsequent to this time period is only justifiable when the end of the decade actually coincides with the end of a historical period. The subject alternative would arbitrarily omit a decade in the noted POS along with the noted eligible resources from this decade. Those eligible structures built in the 1960s are of the Contemporary and Ranch styles, both of which are representative of styles constructed in the 1950s. These omissions would have the potential of compromising any future attempts at recognizing those structures built in Del-Ida Park after 1959 as significant. Based on the emphasis provided in the report (also noted above) on the Contemporary-style and significance of Post-WWII development subsequent to 1959, the Board may find that it would not be appropriate to revise the recommended POS extension from 1970 to 1959, while reclassifying 38 structures built through 1959, and omitting the 10 identified structures built between 1960 and 1965. Alternative 4 As an additional alternative, Staff suggests that the Board consider extending the POS to 1965, as opposed to the recommended 1970. The reduction to 1965 would maintain the reclassification of 48 properties, as no potentially eligible properties were identified after 1965. It is likely that properties over 45 years old were not considered as it is common practice to evaluate resources up to 45 years old, and not younger unless compelling evidence noting its significance has been presented. For example, when Delray Beach designated its first four historic districts in 1988, the POSs for those districts were established at 1943, and those eligible structure built between 45 and 49 years prior were classified as contributing to those districts. While this practice may contradict the arbitrary interruption of a historical time period, Policy A-4.2 of the Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Element notes, "In order to protect the City's historic resources, the Land Development Regulations shall include provisions for designation of historically significant buildings, structures, archaeological sites, or districts. The City Ordinance 15-09; Del-Ida Park Historic District Resurvey HPB Meeting September 16,2009; Page 7 of 8 shall conduct periodic neighborhood surveys to identify and evaluate potential historic resources at least once every five years."With this adopted policy to conduct surveys at least once every five years, it is unlikely that any potential historical resources within a designated historic district would be unprotected as they would be reviewed at least every five years. Further, the City's historic district records would be consistently up to date. In considering the suggested omission of 1965-1970 from the POS, this Policy would ensure that those years will be reviewed no later than 2014. Based on the justification noted in the report regarding the significance of Post-WWII development and the emphasis provided on the Contemporary-style, the Board may find it appropriate to adopt the recommended POS extension to 1965, and reclassify 48 structures as listed in Exhibit A. National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) As previously noted, the resurvey report recommends that the City seek application for listing of the Del-Ida Park Historic District on the NRHP. It should be emphasized that the subject Ordinance recognizes this recommendation but upon adoption the Ordinance will not automatically put forward an application for NRHP listing. Once the City is prepared to seek listing on the NRHP, additional steps will be required for application submittal which would include, but not be limited to, a workshop with property owners, and public hearings held by both the HPB and City Commission. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(M)(5), Findings, the City Commission must make a finding that the text amendment is consistent with and further the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Ordinance 09-08 amended the LDRs to provide for Section 4.5.1(N), Criteria for Change of Historic Classification. During the review period for Ordinance 09-08, the reviewing and/or approving bodies found the amendments to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as follows: • The Historic Preservation Board held a Public Hearing for Ordinance 09-08 at its August 6, 2008 meeting. • The Planning and Zoning Board held a Public Hearing for Ordinance 09-08 at its August 18, 2008 meeting. • The City Commission held a Public Hearing/First Reading for Ordinance 09-08 at its September 3, 2008 meeting, and a Public Hearing/Second Reading at its September 16, 2008 meeting. Therefore, the subject Ordinance may be found to be in compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan as it is in compliance with LDR Section 4.5.1(M), Criteria for Change of Historic Classification. REVIEW BY OTHERS The CRA will review the subject Ordinance at its meeting of September 24, 2009, when a recommendation will be made to the City Commission. ALTERNATIVES 1. Recommend approval to the City Commission of Ordinance 15-09, accepting the resurvey report for the Del-Ida Park Historic District, including extension of the Period of Significance to 1970, reclassification of 48 properties from Non-Contributing to Contributing. • Ordinance 16-09; Del-Ida Park Historic District Resurvey HPB Meeting September 16,2009; Page 8 of 8 2. Recommend approval to the City Commission of Ordinance 15-09, accepting the resurvey report for the Del-Ida Park Historic District, including extension of the Period of Significance to 1970, and reclassification of 38 properties from Non-Contributing to Contributing. 3. Recommend approval to the City Commission of Ordinance 15-09, accepting the resurvey report for the Del-Ida Park Historic District, including extension of the Period of Significance to 1959, and reclassification of 38 properties from Non-Contributing to Contributing. 4. Recommend approval to the City Commission of Ordinance 15-09, accepting the resurvey report for the Del-Ida Park Historic District, including extension of the Period of Significance to 1965, and reclassification of 48 properties from Non-Contributing to Contributing. RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval to the City Commission of Ordinance 15-09, accepting the resurvey report for the Del-Ida Park Historic District, including extension of the Period of Significance to 1965, and reclassification of 48 properties from Non-Contributing to Contributing. Prepared by:Amy E. Alvarez, Historic Preservation Planner Attachments: • Exhibit A—Recommended Reclassifications • Del-Ida Park Historic District Map • Ordinance 15-09 with Attachments A and B EXHIBIT A— RECLASSIFIED PROPERTY LIST Address Year Style 412 NE 2nd Avenue 1955 Ranch 503 NE 2nd Avenue 1947 Streamline Moderne 706 NE 2nd Avenue 1953 Frame Vernacular 524 NE 3`d Avenue 1947 Frame Vernacular 543 NE 3`d Avenue 1955 Contemporary 701 NE 3`d Avenue 1955 Contemporary 703 NE 3`d Avenue 1955 Minimal Traditional 209 NE 5th Court 1949 Frame Vernacular 215-217 NE 5th Court 1952 Contemporary 223 NE 5th Court 1947 Contemporary 225 NE 5th Court 1947 Masonry Vernacular 226-228 NE 5th Court 1953 Contemporary 10 NE 5th Street 1963 _ Contemporary 14 NE 5th Street 1963 Contemporary 18 NE Street 1963 Contemporary 22 NE 5th.Street 1963 Contemporary 102 NE 5th Street 1964 Contemporary 106 NE 5th Street 1965 Contemporary 110 NE 5th Street 1965 Contemporary 215 NE 5th Street 1950 Contemporary 222 NE 5th Street 1953 Contemporary 202 NE 5th Terrace 1951 Masonry Vernacular 204 NE 5th Terrace 1947 Minimal Traditional 216 NE 5th Terrace 1949 Minimal Traditional 234-236 NE 5th Terrace 1954 Contemporary 238-240 NE 5th Terrace 1954 Contemporary 225 NE 5th Street 1948 Minimal Traditional 228 NE 5th Street 1952 Contemporary 10 NE 6th street 1947 Minimal Traditional 11 NE 6th Street 1947 Minimal Traditional 101 NE 6th Street 1949 Contemporary 110 NE 6th Street 1944 Minimal Traditional 116 NE 6th Street 1965 Ranch 14 NE 7t"Street. 1965 Contemporary 102 NE 7th Street 1953 Minimal Traditional 113 NE 7h Street. 1962 Contemporary 14 NE 8th Street 1948 Ranch 216 Dixie Boulevard 1947 Ranch 219 Dixie Boulevard 1950 Contemporary 220 Dixie Boulevard 1947 Ranch 227 Dixie Boulevard 1949 Ranch 228 Dixie Boulevard 1947 Minimal Traditional 240 Dixie Boulevard 1953 Contemporary 109 Fern Court 1954 Ranch 20 Lake Court 1952 Ranch 202 Palm Court 1948 Masonry Vernacular 531 North Swinton Avenue 1947 Masonry Vernacular 721 North Swinton Avenue 1956 Ranch Note:Shaded addresses are those properties omitted from reclassification in Alternatives 2 and 3. --. 1 ; 1/4 1-1 ST._ GEORGE BUSH BOULEVARD :,- --1,-, ,4.30 ---.:4,1,-- ...-tk- .,.,u-4 :, 7,44w.-.41-_ *- ,4-4i 3001 'c e.At• ) 721 14 102 110114 714 ''.-:. 1-)"...4t-..-''' - :-:S. '"61 N:a.:11.- ."4".i.?. 4.4,4,,,!Z•I'V'l 4;. '___,..' 11 -` •‘:.V-1-..Z.,- --, *. ill N).1% '..A...,:4,._,.- .,,...---,r.. r 'Zag r-,' ,. v..- ,,,f,xf ,--:-Ir-.,*- ,-,', "` '44 •t61*-t,.. ....„,5 fir 105 109113 117 N.E. 7TH ST. fli '' 1Y-_-*;7-1•-• YPAIF-"s1 7 " ' 1 605 r• rii:O. - ,,,,,4 VI1418102110 .7,6i6. "V A ej..0%)\''f*1•-''''S...-;', -- ,2,,..,•17,1 703 ' !1—$7 V.Z. ti-4 i 4)1 ,L,--• c6 'c., q5,,tiVt.q1,,,,,f4/0....4.3 1 a (1),• p -, It.. . Iro N, ,., -,-„ ; 11 17 101 105 203 Q? ..4•;:ir.e.t.i.=.:`'tr.1-' .701- -°' .-.-,..7;-\• IV'K• 7e-6W4 __i ,f4fr N.E. 6TH ST. c_, .teriti-4 1 c ij j '53,1 10 1 Io 110 16 144 . .a•74 ' ' .., 1-- z 521 4, t? •1/4-7 - -.`.!-..;.: • lilv,-•-z. tei. .70609. 6' ' -1. •I'f-,..- ''.- - -L'- :` ' I _ ' loW '',#7 '> •../ 6' ,.%.,. 0 42tCi -Vi ''- c., e N.E. 5TH TERR. cr 543 . e- c4..--- tr) I; 238 , , • 70 134- '-;,,it,•-4,-c! 2 t'3 7 524 z•7"::•,,,,,:°4-.4 0:(1:3 1..7- 0,261f- tn.- -7-1 t°R5_24 '-"4.7.. I " c‘i `4: 11*- - ? -. ....t..-....,,,,f;• ,,.704A.: 43 % > 7,9 „ 77 ",--:--11P-H-1 2 .`-t1/41 CNICN "CV .t.--' 7"'" '''.1' 3:Viipt:t p -T6-29,v ,ZN 6_ ,..„ U Ne N.E. 5TH CT. ,..,.,,,eil,z7 ,... I= , -, •C) -',.: . :;4.1,t,_ fite41 .-`4. a.-tV 210 218 pt.- „ „..„...... ,.., .....,........ „,. .. /0,9 .. .,..... ,...„ 714itml 2 101 <,. .... 503 213 225 9 , .. ,,,,,': i z \ (,(N' `t+ Sr,, ° k N.E. 5TFI ST. , .,t':4. ,alctr.--. 1 Cc M •, R5f--7,;) •=t'",,F,2,-...,., ' 418 •• v tN c° k*eero. 15,''' Ir""'i-^ 4-7-'' .' Z 415 ,.„,,,c•I (s) 0 -s- , c..1 s,4 ‘, r,t; ,,ti- , ,,,,,- 1 (..). 1 _ '.,';',4 t„-:-:." 'e." 'v.. -..' ,....• ,t, Ti - ''"F 11.1,` , ' „.: a ti. ,.. c 15 •., ITI 103 ,:li`kkg.f'• z 401 217 11'10t,*;;•t- 1 1.1, 12,...____ . -*!.. -••' 1/4. -44 , "e L,.. -1..t N.E. 4TH ST. - -- Lij .---- - . . i > POST OM CE 0 II ENE CONTRIBUTDICI-INS DES/GMATION DEL-IDA PARK .....= N NON-CONTRIBLITVIG HISTORIC DISTRICT MEI COMMIBUTING-2003 RESURVEY OTT OF DELRAY EEACH,FL I LOCATIONMAP &SINN° DEPARTMENT MAP REF:DEL-IDA PARK — DIGITAL BCE AMP 5157E71-- ORDINANCE NO 15-09 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE RESURVEY REPORT OF DEL-IDA PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT INCLUDING EXTENSION OF THE PERIOD OF SIGNIFICANCE AND RECLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTIES FROM NON-CONTRIBUTING TO CONTRIBUTING, PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, A SAVING CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City retained RJ Heisenbottle Architects, Inc., to resurvey the Del-Ida Park Historic District and the City Commission accepts the survey recommendations to extend the Period of Significance, and seek listing of the district on the National Register of Historic Places; and, WHEREAS, the Del-Ida Park Historic District was originally designated and placed on the Delray Beach Local Register of Historic Places in 1988 with a Period of Significance spanning from 1923-1943; and, WHEREAS, RJ Heisenbottle Architects, Inc. resurveyed the Del-Ida Park Historic District and those properties originally classified as contributing for continued significance and maintenance of historic integrity; and, WHEREAS, RJ Heisenbottle Architects, Inc. resurveyed the Del-Ida Park Historic District and those properties originally classified as non-contributing for current significance and recommends that the Period of Significance be extended through 1970; and, WHEREAS, the Del-Ida Park Historic District was originally significant for its collection of architecture representative of the period from 1923-1943, and is currently significant for its collection of architecture representative of the period from 1944— 1970. WHEREAS, 48 structures now meet the eligibility criteria for contributing status, attributed to the newer resources built 1944 through to 1965, as these buildings have had alterations completed in an appropriate and compatible manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, or have had alterations which are reversible thereby not compromising the structure's integrity; and, WHEREAS, the Del-Ida Park Historic District was originally and is currently significant under the Secretary of the Interiors Criterion A for significance due to associations with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad pattern of the City's history as one of the first planned residential developments in Delray Beach with representation of the 1920s Land Boom and 1930s settlement following the Land Boom and inclusion of post World War II growth from the 1940s through the 1960s; and, WHEREAS, the Del-Ida Park Historic District was originally and is currently significant under the Secretary of the Interiors Criterion B for significance due to associations with people significant to the City, as one of the early investors was Frederick Henry Link, a Craftsman at Mizner Industries, and whose daughter, Catherine Link Strong was the City's first female Mayor and lived in the neighborhood; and, WHEREAS, the Del-Ida Park Historic District was originally and is currently significant under the Secretary of the Interiors Criterion C for significance as it embodies one or more distinctive architectural styles or types such as the Mission, Mediterranean Revival, Minimal Traditional, Contemporary, Masonry and Frame Vernacular, Ranch, and Streamline Moderne, with the Mission and Mediterranean Revival style containing influences directly from renown Architect Addison Mizner, as Frederick Henry Link was a craftsman at Mizner Industries; and, WHEREAS, Section 4.5.1 of the Land Development Regulations of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach provides for the change of historic classification of historic sites and districts; and, WHEREAS, RJ Heisenbottle Architects, Inc. found that the City should seek listing of the Del-Ida Park Historic District on the National Register of Historic Places; and, WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Board held a duly noticed public hearing in regard to the Final Resurvey Report for the Del-Ida Park Historic District on September 16, 2009 and voted to to recommend of acceptance of the Final Resurvey Report and its recommendations including extension of the Period of Significance to 1970 and changes of historic classification for 48 properties within the Del-Ida Park Historic District; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach adopts the findings in the Final Resurvey Report for the Del-Ida Park Historic District; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach adopts the findings in the Historic Preservation Board Staff Report dated September 16, 2009; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach finds the ordinance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach has conducted a duly noticed public hearing in regard to the adoption of the Final Resurvey Report for the Del-Ida Park Historic District. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the recitations set forth above are incorporated herein. Section 2 That the Final Resurvey Report for the Del-Ida Park Historic District is included as Attachment A. Section 3 That the Period of Significance is extended to 1970. Section 4 That the properties listed in Attachment B are hereby classified as set forth in Attachment A and in accordance with and under the provisions of Section 4.5.1 of the Land Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach, Florida. Section 5 That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed. Section 6 That should any section or provision of this ordinance or any portion thereof any paragraph, sentence or word be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. Section 7 That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon passage on second and final reading. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final reading on this the day of , 200_ ATTEST: MAYOR City Clerk First Reading Second Reading CITY OF DELRAY BEACH RESURVEY OF FOUR LOCAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS DF,L-IDA PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT ti • `. w rt+.W4r r.., .� 7 r `�:4"y#f ,.. t.-i. t S t rb ra` S- Lt , .▪ a. Gl t '� f � &-' y i� '▪ , 1. :, r: 2 .� _ �..ail s�'.`�_Y S _ . R.. t _ r •.AfYd p -2 X.,V .. °� `r . i.T M.o A-..- Prepared by: R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A. January 30, 2009 DEL-IDA PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT HISTORIC SURVEY REPORT INTRODUCTION The City of Delray Beach has retained the firm of R.J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A. (RJHA) to resurvey four areas within the city previously listed on the Local Register of Historic Places as Historic Districts. The four areas to be studied are Del-Ida Park, Nassau Park, Old School Square, and West Settlers Historic District. RJHA's task will be to prepare individual Survey Reports for each of the four historic districts. These survey reports will include the following information: • Historical overview of the district. • Review existing criteria for determining contributing and non-contributing structures. • Recommendations on extending Periods of Significance, where appropriate, within the district. • Update Florida Master Site File forms for previously recorded structures. • Prepare new Florida Master Site File forms for previously unrecorded structures • Prepare maps and photographs for all sites within the district. These surveys are reviewing all structures located within the locally designated historic districts that are thirty five (35) years or older. Information on structures currently listed is being updated, noting any alterations, relocations and demolitions since the time that the Designation Report was originally prepared. Structures not previously listed, that meet the 35 year or older criteria and that are deemed"contributing"to the historic district, are being added to the Florida Master Site File and are being recommended for inclusion in the Local Register of Historic Places' Historic District Designation Report. To date, RJHA has completed work on the Nassau Park Historic District and on the Old School Square Historic District and the West Settlers Historic District. The Del-Ida Park Historic Survey Report covers the fourth and final area being studied under this project. This report will provide information on those items outlined above, based on: field work; research conducted on City records including building cards and permits; Sanborn map records available at the Delray Beach Planning and Zoning Department; existing historical publications; previous surveys covering the Del-Ida Park Historic District, such as the Historic Resources Survey. Phase II, conducted by Janus Research in 2002; the Delray Beach Historic Sites Survey_ conducted by John P. Johnson in 1987 and on historical research conducted at the Delray Beach Historical Society. The Del-Ida Park Historic District was officially listed in the Local Register of Historic Places in 1988. A total of 47 sites were listed as individual contributing buildings. Additional contributing sites were identified by the "Historic Resources Survey Report Phase II", conducted by Janus Research in 2002,but were not incorporated as part of the Designation 2 Report. The RJHA Report will update and re-evaluate the information provided in the Janus Report and will make recommendations for additional sites that should be officially listed as contributing structures in the Del-Ida Park Designation Report. BOUNDARIES (See Attachment A: Historic District Map) The Del-Ida Park Historic District is bounded on the north by N.E. 8th Street, on the east by the Florida East Coast Railway, on the south by N.E. 4th Street, and on the west by the east side of N. Swinton Avenue. These are the original boundaries of the development originally platted in 1923. Based on that historical fact, no boundary extension or modification is being recommended for the Del-Ida Park Historic District. CONTEXT The Del-Ida Park Historic District is a 14 block suburban residential area just four blocks north of the heart of downtown Delray Beach. It consists of primarily single family, one story residences, although there are some two story houses and a few duplex structures that were built during the 1950s and 1960s. Although some of the houses have been converted to light office use, the residential character of the area remains fairly intact. The same can be said about the original historic fabric of the structures. Few of the historic houses have been demolished. Only two houses listed on the 1988 Designation Report have been demolished. These were located at 601 N. Swinton Avenue and at 107 N.E. 6t Street. Most of the houses have survived with relatively few unsympathetic alterations or additions. In several instances additions have been made with respect and sensitivity to the original houses, compatible in design yet clearly distinguishable from the historic portion. Specific examples will be presented in the"Architectural Significance" Section. The original plat was laid out in an interesting and unusual fashion, combining a rectangular grid with a series of diagonal streets. Most notable is Dixie Boulevard, which serves as the main concourse in the development, having been laid out 20 feet wider than the rest of the streets. The combination of rectangular and diagonal street design produces a series of unusual triangular blocks and lots with varying street frontage. There are three small public parks that, along with well landscaped grounds and mature trees, contribute to the overall visual quality of the neighborhood. HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE Del-Ida Park is one of the first planned residential developments in Delray Beach. In 1923, the Ocean City Development Company purchased a 58 acre tract in the northeast section of Delray Beach, during the heyday of the Florida Real Estate Boom, and created Del-Ida Park. The development company was organized by Mr. J.C. Secord, of Miami, along with Mr. B.E. Clutter, also of Miami, and Mr. Charles Kuschke of Fort Lauderdale, who planned to open sales offices in Delray(not yet renamed Delray Beach), West Palm Beach and Miami. On 3 September 18, 1923, Del-Ida Park was officially platted and recorded and appears to have been an almost instant success. Del-Ida Park was widely promoted in the Delray News. In a front page article dated September 28, 1923, the newspaper proclaimed that "Del-Ida is growing fast". It goes on to state that 25 of the available 58 lots had been sold and that city water and electricity were being installed. The article also states that"Two beautiful parks are being made and 100's of Australian pines, other trees, flowers and shrubbery are being planted". The newspaper further states that "Mr. Secord and his group bring people daily to visit Del-Ida Park and soon they will have to put more of their lots on the market". On October 19, 1923, the Delray News reported that "Wonderful progress is being made in Del-Ida Park, our new suburb.Nice hard surfaced streets are being run through the property and it is beginning to look like a real town". One of the first investors in the area was Frederick Henry Link, formerly a craftsman of Mizner Industries in West Palm Beach, who in 1923 purchased several lots in Del-Ida Park. Mr. Link soon became the general contractor for the development, and most of the early houses in Del- Ida Park were built by him. That same year he began construction of his own home, located at 524 N.E. 2nd Avenue. The great almost overnight success of the Del-Ida Park was as typical of the Florida Real Estate Boom as its rapid collapse following the Stock Market Crash of 1929 and subsequent years of the Great Depression. Construction continued, but at a much slower pace during the 1930s and 1940s. It was not until the end of World War II that Del-Ida Park experienced a new surge in construction. During the immediate post-war era, Delray Beach saw a marked increase in population, the result of former military personnel stationed in the area that returned and relocated with their families. Del-Ida Park was an attractive middle-class suburban community, centrally located and reasonably priced. Many new houses went up at this time, modest in scale, but representative of the latest trends in architectural design, materials and technology. ARCHITECTURAL SIGNIFICANCE There are many architectural styles represented in Del-Ida Park. Following are examples of the most prevalent ones found within the designated historic district: Frederick Henry Link brought to Del-Ida Park with him the experience he had acquired while working with Addison Mizner in Palm Beach. Inspired by Mizner's grand Mediterranean Revival style houses in Palm Beach, Mr. Link's house set the tone for the architectural style in Del-Ida Park. Smaller in scale and simpler in design, the Link House is mostly Mission style, but with some Mediterranean Revival details, such as the octagonal corner tower and the heavily rusticated doorway surrounds. 4 �r t,`'yam- J N. t ,'i ��,e: ,i'l.,1_ t0� _;31E'# R"'.4; `^ '' If .4.4 �/ fr'_ r , •, 6.:25 F 'a ti 1 _ R ;,,ititk d q 11 ;ti t; t �C �• }1 �{ ' I A / 4T. ' The Link House. 524 N.E. 2nd Avenue (1923) The Mission Style became the predominant design mode for the original houses in the Del-Ida Park development. A scaled down version of the Mediterranean Revival style, the Mission style was widely popular in the 1920s, and its charm and currency made it an important selling tool for the planned residential development. While the Mediterranean Revival style owed its inspiration to the Spanish, Italian and Moorish architecture along the Mediterranean coast, the Mission style was derived from the Spanish Missions in California and New Mexico. In Del- Ida Park, textured stucco surfaces on wood frame structures, flat roofs, molded parapets, scuppers and sparse, if any, applied decorative details were the primary features of the Mission style. Simple designs and inexpensive construction methods made these houses attractive and affordable. A total of 25 of the original Mission Style homes are still standing in Del-Ida Park, although three have seen their original stylistic features altered beyond recognition. These structures have been incorrectly identified as Mediterranean Revival in past surveys. That classification should be corrected in all records. Mission Style Houses o yyr �"5 f �t f ...+v V )11^, * I y• R Y h i-- 1 7 Wil 7' dint, a '-i •', 1 y y- 1. „. • �. tP 1 G ' f [r '� fir. 4. .., i ..ii .ix'fir. 11 Dixie Boulevard 102 N.E. 8th Street 214 N.E. 5`h1 Street The more ornate Mediterranean Revival Style, one of the most popular architectural styles in Florida during the 1920s, is also represented in Del-Ida Park, although not as widely. These buildings are larger, usually two stories and have a greater amount of applied decorative details than the simpler Mission style houses, including arches, a combination of flat and pitched tiled 5 roofs and balconies. One of the best examples of the Mediterranean Revival style may be found in the residence located at 515 N. Swinton Avenue. The fact that it was originally built outside Del-Ida Park at 324 N.E. 2nd Avenue and relocated to its present site in 1961, may explain the anomaly of its more ornate, larger scale within this historic district. The apartment building at 401 N.E. 2nd Avenue is also Mediterranean Revival by its more elaborate design, although its bell-shaped central parapet still harks back to the Mission style. Several of the original Mission style buildings have been modified through additions and alterations into Mediterranean Revival designs. These will be covered in the "Additions and Alterations" Section below. Mediterranean Revival Style =•••:01-4';'-,,,,, e -1-e::*-h---1: "4.i...-,44,,--,:*v.--,-,;;,,,,--- _. ::--- -,:o... . ,-i.i':-ii_, ,,,...'-:,----._,,,,z...6,1,.-x,,--,,,,,-,_,11-?e,-FL.-,.--:k7,..,,----,---'-p.'*" ', . ,,-; . "1.,,--- ::: *;,,e'lif rri'-=',---\ to•••••.1-.-J,, 74 Y ,..; lh ,115 Ill t�l 'CP t i w _fi 1 y7 i' p l y te� 1�i . 4t -! _.,..�:; ",. y l _ t'_.l r?Ft<I!'S-.•r.dF ,It i}/to'6°` a • ��F it P i r11 r VIAif .. 4. 1.....r c ;d 'ti l a-ram�.+--- :, . 401 N.E. 2nd Avenue 515 N. Swinton Avenue Several fine examples of the Minimal Traditional Style are also found in Del-Ida Park. These generally date back to the 1930s to 1950s decades, built originally during the Depression era, and show simple, sober designs with some modest detailing harking back to more traditional styles. Some of the more typical details for these houses include low to medium pitch gable roofs generally facing front, modest overhangs, prominent chimneys, decorative wood details on gable ends, inset porches supported on decorative wood supports and sparsely used Colonial or other traditional applied decoration, such as door and window surrounds. 6 Minimal Traditional Style Houses Few ! �y �e �' `Ya , h ireab„ istr �y.,,. _ _ 7--;:,,,-...---..--.- 204 N.E. 5th Terrace 706 N.E. 2"`Avenue 105 N.E. 6th Street There are many fine examples of Contemporary Style houses that were built during the post World War II building construction surge in Del-Ida Park. These houses are inspired by the International Style that originated in Europe and later traveled to the United States, where it was eminently established by Mies Van der Rohe and his disciple Philip Johnson, among many others. An even more direct influence can be found in the post-war work of masters like Richard Neutra in California and Paul Rudolph in Sarasota. Contemporary style houses in Del-Ida Park have simple, clean lines, highly abstracted, geometric designs and are mostly devoid of any applied decoration. One of the most important features of these buildings is their complete break with traditional, historical models. They rely on massing, new materials and methods of construction and sculptural forms for architectural expression. Most of the houses have flat roofs with broad eaves, may have glass jalousie windows and often an attached carport. These houses were not 50 years old at the time when the Del-Ida Park Historic District was designated, therefore not meeting the age threshold to be considered as contributing structures. It is, however, RJHA's strong recommendation that these houses should be recognized and officially listed as contributing buildings in the Designation Report, for their historical and architectural significance as representative examples of Post- War Era design. Contemporary Style Houses ' t � 1 �j r ` ' ; t "� s 4 215 N.E. 5th Street 222 N.E. 5th Street 240 Dixie Boulevard 7 There is a variety of other architectural styles represented in Del-Ida Park, although not as numerous as the ones identified above. Among the styles that can be found are examples of Frame and Masonry Vernacular, one drastically altered Bungalow, some Streamline Moderne, and several Ranch houses. ADDITIONS AND ALTERATIONS Many of the original structures have been altered and others have been added to, both with varying degrees of success. Some of the original Mission style houses were enlarged during the 1950s. The additions have been successful as statements of their own time, although they may have completely altered the architectural character of the original house. The Mission style house at 217 N.E. 4t Street is no longer recognizable from the front. The addition itself, however, is quite handsome, with a boldly cantilevering carport, and the original building is fairly intact toward the rear of the new structure (See photo below). Y J ! • k — lv4 ` r.Y,. ..eye . elf i •� A .� , ! . sa j •,. j Zf... 217 NE. 4th Street Similarly, the house located at 251 Dixie Boulevard is no longer recognizable as Mission style, yet its original simple lines lent themselves quite nicely to its transformation as a Contemporary style structure (See attached photo). w • _ db7. 251 Dixie Boulevard At 204 Dixie Boulevard, the addition is considerably larger than the original Mission style house, yet the original house is still recognizable, and the addition has been done in a manner which is respectful and compatible. The original house has a simple molded parapet, while the 8 parapet on the addition has a continuous banding at the top. In spite of the all the good attributes of the addition, the overall effect and character is now that of a Mediterranean Revival style building,rather than the original Mission style design intent. A less fortunate addition, however, can be seen at 203 Dixie Boulevard, where the original Mission style house is no longer recognizable, and the entire structure has deceivingly and disarmingly become faux Mediterranean Revival. .,S •ti i, • ,•,y-1 r �,.t . y st f N- : - _ . iI` • it ` ,K ._ ,i t q. 204 Dixie Boulevard 203 Dixie Boulevard Finally, the following two additions are highly successful in their execution. In the house at 110 N.E. 7th Street, the addition is very similar to the original Mission style house, but the connection between old and new is set back, clearly differentiating between the two (See photo below). At 105 N.E. 7th Street, the large two story addition is significantly set back from the original Minimal Traditional style house, and the different massing of the two leaves no doubt where one ends and the other begins (See photo below). 4 . 11 \ tk K +7rt It ;`�'- - -r' .tii. `L.i.� y tc� At `f,. ... 1.i'. ',..-sz.a. . ,t-k4.,47 4 17 15 ..Jf3F�± 5 ;_ 4... ny Y f y, ♦ �i' I'✓ ..c • Ik.N tl■■! i 7St( f'�. � "` 'a �. y.a.k 1 , 1'fT +r.<.. ,)4 t / e 110 N.E. 7th Street 105 N.E. 7th Street 9 PERIOD OF SIGNIFICANCE One of the objectives of the Delray Beach"Resurvey of Four Local Register Historic Districts" project is to assess the feasibility of expanding the current Period of Significance. Structures thirty five (35) years or older will be recorded in the Florida Master Site File, so that the information contained in the State's database will be not only current but actually ahead of the 50 threshold for historic consideration. This does not mean that structures that are 35 to 50 years old will automatically be deemed contributing, but rather they will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis for possible eligibility. The Del-Ida Park Historic District Designation Report, approved in 1988, places the Period of Significance cut-off date by which structures are to be evaluated at 1943. The cut-off date is based in the generally accepted 50 year old threshold for considering eligibility of structures for listing as "contributing" within a designated historic district. In terms of historical and architectural development, it is difficult to justify this date under any other criteria than the 50 year threshold. The post World War II era was a significant period in the historic and architectural development of Delray Beach. There was a marked population increase, as many GIs stationed in the area relocated with their families after the war. As a result, Delray Beach saw a period of growth in business, tourism, and consequently in job opportunities and therefore an increase in demand for housing. Although the housing shift was mostly towards outlying suburban expansion and away from the center of town, as was typical everywhere else in the country at that time, Del-Ida Park remained an attractive neighborhood, affordable and conveniently close to downtown. This report has already discussed the architectural significance of the Contemporary Style housing built during this era. Many of the structures that RJHA has identified and recorded for the first time as part of this Resurvey Project date from 1963-1965. The house pictured below, for instance, is part of a block-long cohesive group built during that time period, although unfortunately, most have been seriously altered. li. • F a. `L t,,h �t3 r '. ., a a '_ , d „ ,„„„ .„ ; ... , 10 NE 5th Street Based on the above cited historical and architectural significance of Del-Ida Park in the post-war era, it is our recommendation to extend the Period of Significance to 1970. 10 RE-EVALUATION OF CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES This report has updated and re-evaluated the "District Inventory" provided as part of the 1988 Designation Report, which identified 47 Contributing Structures. Following is a summary of our re-evaluation, which includes sites previously recorded and recommended for inclusion in the Designation Report by the 2002 Janus Report: • Contributing Structures Identified in the 1988 Designation Report 47 • New Contributing Structures per 2002 Janus Report 34 • New Contributing Structures per RJHA Report 19 • Non-Contributing Structures 58 • Demolished Structures 2 NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBILITY The Del-Ida Park Historic District contains sufficient historical and architectural significance as a planned 1920s residential development to be potentially eligible for consideration as a National Register Historic District. A stronger yet case could be made for a Multiple Resource nomination for the original 1920s Mission style buildings in the development. Another option is to pursue individual National Register nomination for the Frederick Henry Link House at 524 N.E. 2nd Avenue, based on Criteria A (for its association with the planned development), Criteria B (for its association with an individual who made a significant contribution to the development) and C (for its architectural significance as a 1920s Mission style-themed development). Any of the above options are feasible and realistic for National Register consideration. FLORIDA MASTER SITE FILES Florida Master Site File forms have been updated for all "Contributing Structures" previously recorded as part of the 1988 Designation Report or as part of the 2002 Janus Report. The following structures will be submitted for addition to the FMSF and new numbers will be requested for them: • 543 NE 3rd Avenue • 701 NE 3rd Avenue • 10 NE 5th Street • 14 NE 5th Street • 18 NE 5th Street • 22 NE 5th Street • 102 NE 5th Street • 106 NE 5th Street • 110 NE 5th Street • 215 NE 5th Street • 222 NE 5th Street 11 • 225 NE 5th Street • 116 NE 6th Street • 721 N Swinton Avenue • 14 NE 7th Street • 113 NE 7th Street • 14 NE 8th Street • 225 Royal Court • 202 Palm Court SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the Del-Ida Park Historic District local designation be amended to reflect the following: • Amend the Inventory contained in the 1988 Designation Report to include the new structures being added to the FMSF as part of this report. • Extend the Period of Significance to 1970, based on the historical and architectural significance of the Post World War II period in the development of Del-Ida Park. • Amend the Inventory to identify the original structures in the Del-Ida Park development as designed in the Mission style, not as Mediterranean Revival, as originally indicated in the 1988 Designation Report and in the 1987 Delray Beach Historic Sites Survey. The breakdown of Mission and Mediterranean Revival style houses within the Del-Ida Park Historic District is provided in the attached "List of Surveyed Resources" in Appendix B. CONCLUSIONS Del-Ida Park is a remarkably cohesive and well preserved neighborhood. Few of the original structures have been demolished and alterations have been, for the most part, relatively benign. Even those structures deemed "Non-Contributing" due to their recent date of construction or unsympathetic alterations maintain a sense of cohesiveness in their scale, setback, use of materials and overall architectural character. The new encroaching development is nearby, but it is yet to cross N.E. 4th Street into Del-Ida Park. There is a palpable sense of pride and identity in the neighborhood residents. The historic district designation has made a positive contribution towards the visual quality and historical integrity of Del-Ida Park. This is evident in the marked improvement in the alterations and additions being made, and in the slowing down of the development pressure that the immediate area is facing. 12 SOURCES • Florida Master Site Files. Delray Beach. • Historic Site Files. City of Delray Beach Planning and Zoning Department. • Building Card Files. City of Delray Beach Planning and Zoning Department. • Property Control Numbers. Property Appraisers Office. City of Delray Beach. • Sanborn Insurance Maps. 1926, 1949, 1963. • Delray Beach Historic Sites Survey. By John P. Johnson. Historic Palm Beach County Preservation Board. July 1987. • Del-Ida Park Historic District. Designation Report. Historic Preservation Board. Delray Beach, Florida. January 15, 1988. By Patricia Cayce. • Historical and Photographic Files. Delray Beach Historical Society. • Delray News. August 17, 1923; August 31, 1923; September 28, 1923; October 19, 1923. Delray Beach Historical Society. • City of Delray Beach. Historic Resources Report. Janus Research. July 1999. • City of Delray Beach. Historic Resources Report. Janus Research. June 2002. 13 APPENDIX A LIST OF SURVEYED RESOURCES 14 DEL-IDA ;PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT LIST OF SURVEYED RESOURCES P61SP M Name Address Date Contd. Nan-Contr. Derna11shed P800185 51811Swii ton Avccxia 1925 khdsorrecomR van I X P603104 2 Mite Se tevard 1937 k144 1ryr Vwnac041 X P933252 19 QFxio Bodarcrd 1925 Pis ca X 1,800254 125 Cdrta BOet'evard 1925 Meddeerrarm1n Ii teitat I X P500255 203D die Bevtteoterd 1925 Me50erra neon Reai'+eil X P000258 204101de lvttwrard 1925 MedWN%r a.#1 RartaV X P803257 232 Coda BceLaverd 1925 Madan X P1M02 8 238CadaBatiac+ad 1925 M[1cn X F600293 30 Lake Cotal 1.=5 M444 1 X P600301 241 Rcyel Owl 1925 r444:4sa X P900302 247 Royal Coco 1925 Miszea X P1300331 415 NSwimeerAvonua 1923 k5sdca X P800377 4011'4E2Avenue 1938 11 edOareerenR:ria1 X 11600378 11344Ma Towers Apartments 524 NE 2 Name! 1923 NI44144e X P900429- kink Hoene 218 NE,5 Crawl 1925 11444o41 X P900427 9 FE 8 Screed 1925 kIxicn X P®00428 101 CE 5812444 1925 MFsicn X KX)0424 214 NE 5 SErtwi 1925 MFvito X P8 00468 110 NE;7 Streai 19215 IVI sin X P900400 102 NB.8 Strod 1COB Madan X P800470 114 PE 856441 1925 Mi34M X PB10739 103 PE 4 Skold 1938 M0440ry Verrratttar X F1910740 C•1.NI otracq Ho111a4 217 NE 4 VI eal 1933 11ifi4crt X PB10741 219FE 5Strad 1950 ktxcnrjrVorrocr ar X P010742 228 FE 5&reel 1952 Conden•Fwraryr X P1810744 210PE5Cotrl 1417 Frame uerrracuFar X DEL-IDA PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT LIST OF SURVEYED RESOURCES IFMSF 4 Name Address. Date Contd. Non-Contr. Demolished PB1074+; 211!.-217 re 50ail ies2 C)onNMI"Prl X P810748 223FE 5Cout 1947 Cdrlltetpar. yr X P610747 225 FF.5 Cool 194T Mason r Vornxctar X P610748 226-223 FE 5 Ce rt 1953 Canliarr rarary X P1310750 202 PIE$Terror:* 1951 NktismryVeerocttsr X PB107 1 204 NE 5 TarrK9 1947 Nirtrnar Traci don0 X P1310752 216NE5Tcmco 1949 NE.6..i Traci bores t X PB107S3 234.235 FE5 Tccraco 1954 Contxrporary X P610754 233,240 FE5 Tetraaa 1954Coolkwriporsty X F1310 755 11 NE 6 Shx!4 1947 Mfrcntx TrwIlYoroi X P1310755 17NE 9 Etna44 1 h4*ion X P1310757 101 NE!l Soroc4 1943 Conbccrporay X F310758 105NE8SMeet 1£9 NfrertdtTrseilitai X P610759 110 FE 6 Stret4 1E144 kSftn*:Tradltioroi X F1310790 105 PE 7$ act 1941 Frem Varnaarlar X P1310791 102 FE 7 Strout 1953 NErirrei Tradiiaaat X F610763 437 N Swinton Avcnere 1941 N6nirr4si Tr tdtiored X 11310797 521 NSYvh nAvenue 1939 Mrinr Tradlgargri X P1310793 5?1 NSwkr4vn vanur: 1947 N onryVrrwxcfor X P810709 0a5 N Swinton Avaiuo 1925 Nrctdon X P610770 109 Ferri Coy t 1954 FIN.'eh X PS10771 14 MO Sztiteverd 1925 k4Ytrrat Trodronsit X P610772 23 Cixi9 Socfarerd 1937 Franc,Vorrtaariar X P1110774 10tS Doaio Bauk+rrsd 1930 E ngatow* X P610775 109 Daie Bot.feetard 1937 Itr rmi Trad Kona 1 X F1310 r 6 116 Dhier Bxft+reard 1930 MFssran X ' , DEL ILIA PARK.HISTORIC DISTRICT . LIST OF SURVEYED RESOURCES PMSS N Name Address Date Conti. Non-Contr. Demolished P81Q777 21000t48 avrd 1947 Rarr,dh X P810778 219 Dale Batarard 1A60 CanmaporaY X P810779 2200aLa8oatarad 1947 R,na'r X P810780 227 Ohio Bntaread 1949 Randh X P810781 22aOhFbBaMrrrd 1947 AiNma1Tr*diPmel X P81Q782 24000148+49.rrd 19d3 Oloitwpowy X P81078t1 251 C tio8adarxd 1925 ►ise«r.CareaaparaaY X P810784 10Lak•Car1 1940 'Animal Tradtianal X P810785 18Lake Caat 1941 FremeVertaar8rr X --• P81Q707 20 L* Cant 1925 Fraa',QVaaga4 X J P810788 20 era Ccut 1952 Rana, X P810791 412NE2Averw• 1955 Ranch X P810792 41$NE 2 A ou a 1925 1444f44, X P81Q791 5931.1E2Avan 1047 Vr*Anfin aModarrl4 X P810788 524t1E3Mom* 1947 PtoowVoax,wbr X P1310800 703NE3Aveaw41 1955 hirima1TradticeaI X P810801 703t1E2Av nu• 1953 Frent.V•Ali altar X P814233 10 71E 4 S4raar 1925 Alasanry Varrw4t4!r X P1314234 107 tE 9 Stroct X P814235 5 NE7 SAdo4 1939 RMS.V•a•iaibe X P814238 714 NE 2 Arot j e 1925 Me4t rrsrraan Roxfnel X P814277 543NE3Avaua 1935 GmtoaWwrY X P814238 701 tie 3Awnua 1901 hiiiad Traditional X P814239 10tE5Shee1. 1953 Coattativorray X P814240 14 to 5 5410 1983 Contemporary X P814241 1011E 554rpat 1003 Con4aopararY X DEL-IDA ;PARKEHHSTORtC DISTRICT ' iS 1 SURVEYERESOURET FUSE N Name Address Date Contd. Non-Contr. Demolished P614242 22 NE 6 Sor+w 1963 44nta3'por?ry X P814243 102 NE 5 Stott 1904 ContonQorary X P814244 106 FE 5 Shod 1905 Contonporary X PB14245 1101E 56aett 1965 C4nteno5r y X P814246 2151E 55tree4 1990 r..onteetpotsary X PS14247 7221'e 5 SbQa 10e0 4mPxnNrary X P814248 2091E 5Cote '1949 Fr aVotwtr X PB14249 101E 6811'4e1 '1947 hlrfmaF TrsdborpF X P5514250 116 FE 651210 1485 Pandl X 00 P614261 li 714E.751ra 1939 PrgernV4rrwawlr X P814252 11 t1ixda&utovad '1925 hEseion X P814253 701 N SwihMn Averue 1940 WeirnsF Tod/Sarni X PS14254 141010BOklee4r1 1E09 Ntrfn434Tre411544r4F X P8142S5 22611c$SC4ot 1945 1W4rin*Trpdronal X P1314256 4]3N6witcnkronen, 1925 hlmsanreVornocdar X P814257 14FE76tre.11 1955 Cantenrxrary X P2314253 1 A PE 6 Stret4 1946 Rorie! X P1114V4 721 NSwhtonAwna4 19",1% ROF101 X P814200 225 R7r i Court Mitm ry Vcrn cd r X PB14261 202PatrnCou: 1948 hlssonrrVotroctla X PB14262 1131E 78beet: 1982 Ceotern 5raty X 141PE Nth 8beN4 1472 Conteerp:.tory X 111 1E 401 Stroot 1947 hla;anri Vornacrl2r X 415NE2rrlAvmua 1995 Fr noVainswtr X 511 FE 2rd Aveay ut. 1054 M stray Vei'rrmettat X 5181E:2rd Avec tte 1154 Mr-14nry Verwctfer X DEL-1DA PARK H1STOREC DISTRICT LIST OF SURVEYED RESOURCES. FA75A/I Name Address. Date Contd. Non.Cantr. demog shed GIVE 2rK1Aue41uee 1957 MxselrrVerrcerclim X 232 NE 5t11 Stro44 195:2 MasEnrtr VidmacRtar X 219 FL 5th Streoe 1950 hl5smre Veerncam X 200FE5thamid 1952 MfrsorleiVeanxrier X 233 NE.571OPu9 1954 Mm4nry V444'44404 X 201 Fie Sth Coal 1448 hlazAnrr Vaararuirr X =9FE0thCou1 1947 Promo Varna whit X 218 FE Sth Ttaraca 1953 Nisstor,Wenaotatr X 220 FE 511 Terms* 1954 h 744ci 1y Vearkvcciraro X 230.252 r1E;WI Torr;44, 1'9 MatKnit f Vmmcs 144 X 411 NSwa ton Manua 1950 Mncnr/Voerrxeis X 527 N Swirl boo Avaeti4 1947 11.1411e4l6*Ve4rmctlfrr X 111 1'1 Swh1on kactle 1982 Maexc r{Vcaraadar X 41,E:7th 540a9 Mas«tly Vairixt144 X 10?OE 7th:Saws 1912 FromVartncukt X 17 FE 781 Seroa1 1954 ht:rsanr/Veeraedat X 18 FE7th9ht 4 1939 MVP:Oro'Veartatttar X 108 NE 781 Erser4 1447 Fraerw V41114 44 X 110 PE 8th Stroud 19*29 hSsdon X 230 FE 8th Strea 1952 Mtu nrr Varrocd i X 117 Fran Coetrl 1951 P.2nd1 X 102 D&fo Baukersd 1948 Mosenr/Vorrneets X 112 DCrio Boukrrard 2007 MtMsortr/Vornacdrs X 243064i4&wkrreed 1981 MsieneeVeeerxriae X 250 D'aio Bobo d 1972 Modem X 23.239 Raid C 14 1952 Mrssm e7 Vearlxsir t X DEL-4DA PA1 HISTORIC DISTRICT ' LIST OF SURVEYED RESOURCE FMSF H Name Address Date Contd. Non-Contr. Demolished 24 Rayor Cowl 1E66 4mtleniarary X 10 ttd?8 Cart 195A (P 1c',d In 1999j X . 14Ltko Cart 1056 Ranch X 222 NMI Unit 1956 NitrtteirfVea dar X Z26 Fern Co of 1 S57 Mason ry VerrocA r X 200 P nrCoout 1959 MaonryVornactt?r X 491PE3rdAvorrn i9l& ICAmarryVorrocds X 405FE3ttlAv0nw 1963 %sowVenxr3ar X 410 P E 3r4 Ato * 1998 Minn!?Verrtaettar X N CDrr 412 NE Ord Aww 1099 M7t onry VarrucdLr X 415NEaidAvorrn 1969 MasonryVorrmds X 505 NE 3rd Av15r7.M 1963 Msimry VerrrsctJrr X 520NE3rdAverxe 1947 MaaonryVetroattr X 526NE9rdAwna 1999 M:airyVor w Lsr X 541 NF.3rdAvonr! lilac MascrinrVornxdN• X 601NE3rdA40IX* 1955 MssanryVended& X 665 M.SKI A*ni.44 1972 Mxsanry Vertaetror X 909FV.lid Awns 1967 !Amcor/Vcrnacr.itar X 6151,E3rdAwnuo 1972 MronryVanxda X 917.618 NE 3rd Avarro 1872 Mssonrr Vernxdor X 621 NE 3rd Avenue. 1956 Mstanrr Vesrrxtiar X 625NE3rdAwrRrs 1%7 Maim ryVe+raeder X 702 NE 3rd A%arrro 101 M2conre Varnacti',r X 710 NE.3rciAvoncn 1953 6UsonryVorrcxda X 715INE SKI Awn 1972 MsxnryVernxtIIr X 723NtardAwnw 1999 M4onryVa<rrsattar X APPENDIX B DEL-IDA PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT MAP 21 , I 1 I I I ' I I ST. ilh -1• N.E. I 1 I I I - -\ I ri Zid , N.W. 8TH ST. C2I ICL.I ._..4.--.1 <MI •,\. ,,ic;:.--43,'.4' --4-:,--,;•..- -, ,. i . .. -.."---....;4....... , .4? c., „. .0,...--i--...--,:-....-1;--,?•-.f -..:. !,,,,,,---.,:-- 1•,-;:-1 .z.!:.,...,.,P.......J.t,L, -.3,-1,---1;-• \-\• .. .',.'ir.- ;...•,?5, i ''{-' -L--'74L6' eiZ..-::fe;'.. :.,..-'.''...:T.--'f..c /47.:< i-il-' M I 4,-,,_-- )1.4t1'1:17:ltfit9.11Y.7: ,. ''..„.',:: ,.:1-.7"-1,-:-,,,7- ...,12•50..,-•• ,,,,..,-,...:...ST. 11.',q91.,..ji:i"z‘..:p. ,,-..:f.----4...;.,-.1,; /- . ...,......., .--,..,, ,.....,,,-,....;,,,, ..c.,,•- 1 N q N.E. 7TH ST. / -,,‘„.-..f.:,:-..:?.,. .,..,:, N.. ,•,..zv,:i.-;-,=;-; .- 703..\ ‘.,::.,, ' . T ,.-;:t:-. ; ( i :.„:,,,, , _ , . „ 1•••It'.---'' Ili <512.-.L. \-1...1P". ....Vo - • ,,-4; ,,.:.-,_ 4 ,..,,,-. . N.E. 7' o' 61.1_ii .1 . ::'::- .,;;;;;,-;!' .".,x _ Q-14.,,.- .--.st 4,,,.:-..,.'•-li? gffn. ' 2 z ST. 1 • ) N.E. 6TH ST. - --'•,. '''''k''.:-.".-1:P. 's?'' EM" . • r --:-. ' ' iI co co 15.47,1 ' :.• -,:-..--f.'4. = T 6-5-.?'<g,c"'-'23.-.'',- °:;'--, "' kS.7.'<; 7:':)Z.,i.,,..1 .,T-..:,_k(/\•-• 1:-':::':' ''.;., -7;:•;T I- I-- --- D---- a .''''%,'S-7"' -';'-,4" '''''".' 4.'"'" •;-: ':X.--`. ..'-',_;•. --,=-: ...0..'.!:<41,..'• ilmas i 0 0 ____....;., 4,2;3•""•1,---„;-_:=',-. .ir 0.-:i.-?..1f.,*.re-4.. 7,,'W.. ,..:-...1:- - ,z, cn z N.E.N.E.6TH ST.E ,-.,...,.N. ,t„,.-e- -, N.E.. 5TH 1-ERR. c ..-.-.. i .s.' ,' _- .1...•e :.' .".-I -,,q'],"* - ,.---:' -t-8.:1',••-•-i,;,13-8 '-'«..:'.1,;1'.. • ' f•:',.;:''' '''.: 4LA'''9.?" it141 '0-Pift;4•:9-.•,'QP;;,,:I11I1Ris•lfi', ,,. .';;;•'1,-1.' 6 6 ANE 1 %.-q'•;•......•$•i''..2:%2 '72 ,-.' N .17.4•`.1,1, 4 "rr,,n'l "••;1;":"".11;': Z Z .,,,,,,-,,;1•;,.f,p,,k, .' ,, 4. 0 ,:•-.1 '. Z . :"•r 1' ; ."-t,, .1Z-3Wf',iY -„ ',.'.. ..•;1;'.,;-:•, : >-.- ›- N -2011,209'•-,i,N2.'-.7i'N ' '-'''.‘-'.'t- = 1 522 7::',. ..:','1.`''..' N.E. 5TH CT. L.r.:-.;!-:.-.• V5 Vi 1.5'11'';',1" C) C''..-,'"?.00.-±`:..,ts--/..-.F:, jiil L: PUBLI X '-t- N.E. <ft!9 -,:. .e7'...-,.'',...'" ;7 : .7.701.0t,',21 .-iIK.f Ill .V1,:',.-r,-,:" • ., . *;;;:::i.c,..:\. i,,!:;' . :;,-.7).. ,1:11. ,i tL,:r 4 — 'Al;f;',-, :,--.\'0,•--7 ,, ,0,.!*; 215:I,-'II' T:.-,,=',1:,.fi o >: cz,A;;•,"'v--.1,01•41-:-.., <8-- ,f,,-.....2,,,zi-g.t. .-.,I_N:=1 , ._„.., 1.,-.) 5,.., .-....- TRINITY N.E. STH ST. = i LUTHERAN .7- -4,--4.. -1- 11,aial...` .-:.,.:...ftI 'esi to.-'-'-','", ,'''-1:',.-'- ;..4.1.,-,_...•4,;:,'..,,.:CC, COR 0'.' ' .:45,.4 ,,,I -,,,i,c,,,,z.--,23.z1 ,....,:,:.r., ti — _I• ,.........-5,4°""' . 0- ..;1* ,,, ' As.Cs.1:‘,-,— '- • < ..:4,1t1,....1:4;37.7 7:1r::!..rit-,-W..,,,:t'r* 1'411 t---,:.;:',c.,'"', Li 'b'--5; '''' WAL- ww . . . .-A-..... Z -..:;...,, , _ 24:graffF.,pillb:*4i.---ril, 44 - ;-:: •.,--- ..-2, ,:..1-T__„..,,.-.! „ _-.. ..--..-.,ff$i. -.:.-•2,/..,...1-..1 L..., a hi \GREENSLL1 - a ',1--?n,'*rii-_, ..,--`• ili". 4•1•II .•.";',"_,..'.:•..2•'1-i' .-. .. . i I, s.----1-.--,LL, ... .. Z LI 0 POST < a -- CASON 1- - OFFICE 0 Li -- Z > METHODIST *'-- csi cs- < < ,CHURCH w < _ _ . F.-- - 5-I o 1 1 Li m 1_.... I- > o 1.0 CO La ___ _J 0_ O. LAI I-- <t.,, i 1 _ z ET_ L.L.i l..1..i 1 - L.; Z Z Z .. 3RD ST. N.E. 3RD ST. ______,_______ / . . 3RD ST. t.:1-.....?...e..4-7...1,CONTRIBUTING-ON DESIGNATION REPORT N DEL-1DA PARK I.:-.. .•.I CONTRIBUTING-NEW -War- HISTORIC DISTRICT jz4.,,:....,..=.1 NON-CONTRIBUTING CITY CC DELRAY BEACti,FL PLANNING I2 TONING OCPARIUGIT ADDRESS DISTRICT MAP , ... I DEMOLISHED : -- OICITAL 845E.41AP SYSTEM-- IMP REF DEL—IDA PARK 1210MM'KFORAZATION CSTALKI.:til.Z.MARCH 22.lf...6 .../.604A.4.4 rE AC.1,,,,4315 t Ordinance 15-09 Attachment B Del-Ida Park Historic District Property Classification List Address Classification Year Style Built 401 NE 2"d Avenue Contributing 1936 Mediterranean Revival 412 NE 2nd Avenue Contributing 1955 Ranch 415 NE 2nd Avenue Non-Contributing 1995 Frame Vernacular 418 NE 2"d Avenue Contributing 1925 Mission 503 NE 2nd Avenue Contributing 1947 Streamline Moderne 511 NE 2nd Avenue Non-Contributing 1954 Masonry Vernacular 518 NE 2nd Avenue Non-Contributing 1950 Masonry Vernacular 524 NE 2nd Avenue Contributing 1923 Mission 615 NE 2nd Avenue Non-Contributing 1957 Masonry Vernacular 706 NE 2nd Avenue Contributing 1953 Frame.Vernacular 714 NE 2nd Avenue Contributing 1925 Mediterranean Revival 401 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1968 Masonry Vernacular 405 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1968 Masonry Vernacular 410 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1968 Masonry Vernacular 412 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1968 Masonry Vernacular 415 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1968 Masonry Vernacular 505 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1968 Masonry Vernacular 520 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1947 Masonry Vernacular 524 NE 3rd Avenue Contributing 1947 Frame Vernacular 525 NE 3`d Avenue Non-Contributing 2001 Masonry Vernacular 541 NE 3`d Avenue Non-Contributing 1968 Masonry Vernacular 543 NE 3rd Avenue Contributing 1955 Contemporary 601 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1955 Masonry Vernacular 605 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1972 Masonry Vernacular 609 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1957 Masonry Vernacular 615 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1972 Masonry Vernacular 617-619 NE 3`d Avenue Non-Contributing 1972 Masonry Vernacular 621 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1956 Masonry Vernacular 625 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1957 Masonry Vernacular 701 NE 3rd Avenue Contributing 1955 . Contemporary. 702 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1953 Masonry Vernacular 703 NE 3`d Avenue Contributing 1955 Minimal Traditional 710 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1953 Masonry Vernacular 715 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1972 Masonry Vernacular 723 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1968 Masonry Vernacular 15 NE 4th Street Contributing 1925 Masonry Vernacular 101 NE 4th Street Non-Contributing 1972 Contemporary 111 NE 4th Street Non-Contributing 1947 Masonry Vernacular 200 NE 5th Court Non-Contributing 1952 Masonry Vernacular 201 NE 5th Court Non-Contributing 1948 Masonry Vernacular 209 NE 5th Court Contributing 1949 Frame Vernacular 210 NE 5th Court Contributing 1917 Frame Vernacular 215-217 NE 5th Court Contributing 1952 Contemporary 218 NE 5th Court Contributing 1925 Mission 223 NE 5th Court Contributing 1947 Contemporary 1/4 Ordinance 15-09 Attachment B Del-Ida Park Historic District Property Classification List Address Classification Year Style Built 225 NE 5th Court Contributing 1947 Masonry Vernacular 226-228 NE 5th Court Contributing 1953 Contemporary 229 NE 5th Court Non-Contributing 1947 Frame Vernacular 230 NE 5th Court Non-Contributing 1954 Masonry Vernacular 232 NE 5th Street Non-Contributing 1952 Masonry Vernacular 219 NE 5th Street Non-Contributing 1950 Masonry Vernacular 9 NE 5th Street Contributing 1925 Mission 10 NE 5th Street Contributing 1963 Contemporary 14 NE 5th Street Contributing 1963 Contemporary 18 NE 5th Street Contributing 1963 Contemporary 22 NE 5th Street Contributing 1963 Contemporary 101 NE 5th Street Contributing 1925 Mission 102 NE 5th Street Contributing 1964 Contemporary 106 NE 5th Street Contributing 1965 Contemporary 110 NE 5th Street Contributing 1965 Contemporary 214 NE 5th Street Contributing 1925 Mission 215 NE 5th Street Contributing 1950 Contemporary 219 NE 5th Street Non-Contributing 1950 Masonry Vernacular 222 NE 5th Street Contributing 1953 Contemporary 225 NE 5th Street Contributing 1948 Minimal Traditional 228 NE 5th Street Contributing 1952 Contemporary 202 NE 5th Terrace Contributing 1951 Masonry Vernacular 204 NE 5th Terrace Contributing 1947 Minimal Traditional 216 NE 5th Terrace Contributing 1949 Minimal Traditional 218 NE 5th Terrace Non-Contributing 1953 Masonry Vernacular 226 NE 5th Terrace Non-Contributing 1954 Masonry Vernacular 230-232 NE 5th Terrace Non-Contributing 1956 Masonry Vernacular 234-236 NE 5th Terrace Contributing 1954 Contemporary 238-240 NE 5th Terrace Contributing 1954 Contemporary 10 NE 6th street Contributing 1947 Minimal Traditional 11 NE 6th Street Contributing 1947 Minimal Traditional 17 NE 6th Street Contributing 1925 Mission 101 NE 6th Street Contributing 1949 Contemporary 105 NE 6th Street Contributing 1939 Minimal Traditional 107 NE 6th Street Contributing --- Demolished —2005 110 NE 6th Street Contributing 1944 Minimal Traditional 116 NE 6th Street Contributing 1965 Ranch 4 NE 7th Street (531 N Swinton Ave) Non-Contributing Masonry Vernacular 5 NE 7th Street Contributing 1939 Frame Vernacular 10 NE 7th Street Non-Contributing 1999 Frame Vernacular 14 NE 7th Street Contributing 1965 Contemporary 17 NE 7th Street Non-Contributing 1954 Masonry Vernacular 18 NE 7th Street Non-Contributing 1969 Masonry Vernacular 102 NE 7th Street Contributing 1953 Minimal Traditional 105 NE 7th Street Contributing 1941 Frame Vernacular 2/4 Ordinance 15-09 Attachment B Del-Ida Park Historic District Property Classification List Address Classification Year Style Built 109 NE 7th Street Non-Contributing 1999 Frame Vernacular 110 NE 7th Street Contributing 1925 Mission 113 NE 7th Street Contributing 1962 Contemporary 117 NE 7th Street Contributing 1939 Frame Vernacular 14 NE 8th Street Contributing 1948 Ranch 102 NE 8th Street Contributing 1925 Mission 110 NE 8th Street Contributing 1925 Mission 114 NE 8th Street Contributing 1925 Mission 230 NE 8th Street Non-Contributing 1962 Masonry Vernacular 2 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1937 Masonry Vernacular 11 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1925 Mission 14 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1925 Minimal Traditional 19 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1925 Mission 23 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1937 Frame Vernacular 101 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1939 Minimal Traditional 102 Dixie Boulevard Non-Contributing 1948 Masonry Vernacular 106 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1930 Bungalow 109 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1937 Minimal Traditional 112 Dixie Boulevard Non-Contributing 2007 Masonry Vernacular 118 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1930 Mission 125 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1928 Mediterranean Revival 203 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1925 Mediterranean Revival 204 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1925 Mediterranean Revival 216 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1947 Ranch 219 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1950 Contemporary 220 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1947 Ranch 227 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1949 Ranch 228 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1947 Minimal Traditional 232 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1925 Mission 236 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1925 Mission 240 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1953 Contemporary 243 Dixie Boulevard Non-Contributing 1961 Masonry Vernacular 250 Dixie Boulevard Non-Contributing 1972 Modern 251 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1925 Mission/Contemporary 109 Fern Court Contributing 1954 Ranch 117 Fern Court Non-Contributing 1957 Ranch 10 Lake Court Contributing 1940 Minimal Traditional 14 Lake Court Non-Contributing 1956 Ranch 18 Lake Court Contributing 1941 Frame Vernacular 20 Lake Court Contributing 1952 Ranch 26 Lake Court Contributing 1925 Frame Vernacular 30 Lake Court Contributing 1925 Mission 202 Palm Court Contributing 1948 Masonry Vernacular 222 Palm Court Non-Contributing 1956 Masonry Vernacular 226 Palm Court Non-Contributing 1957 Masonry Vernacular 3/4 Ordinance 15-09 Attachment B Del-Ida Park Historic District Property Classification List Address Classification Year Style Built 230 Palm Court Non-Contributing 1959 Masonry Vernacular 225 Royal Court Non-Contributing 1997 Masonry Vernacular 235-239 Royal Court Non-Contributing 1952 Masonry Vernacular 241 Royal Court Contributing 1925 Mission 247 Royal Court Contributing 1925 Mission 249 Royal Court Non-Contributing 1956 Contemporary 403 North Swinton Avenue Contributing 1925 Masonry Vernacular 407 North Swinton Avenue Contributing 1941 Minimal Traditional 411 North Swinton Avenue Non-Contributing 1956 Masonry Vernacular 415 North Swinton Avenue Contributing 1925 Mission 515 North Swinton Avenue Contributing 1925 Mediterranean Revival 521 North Swinton Avenue Contributing 1939 Minimal Traditional 527 North Swinton Avenue Non-Contributing 2007 Masonry Vernacular 531 North Swinton Avenue Contributing 1947 Masonry Vernacular 605 North Swinton Avenue Contributing 1925 Mission 701 North Swinton Avenue Contributing 1940 Minimal Traditional 711 North Swinton Avenue Non-Contributing 1962 Masonry Vernacular 721 North Swinton Avenue Contributing 1956 Ranch 4/4 Ordinance 15 0 9 Del Ida Park istoric District Alternate Recommendations 1. Recommend approval to the City Commission of Ordinance 15-09, accepting the resurvey report for the Del-Ida Park Historic District, including extension of the Period of Significance to 1970, reclassification of 48 properties from Non-Contributing to Contributing. 2. Recommend approval to the City Commission of Ordinance 15-09, accepting the resurvey report for the Del-Ida Park Historic District, including extension of the Period of Significance to 1970, and reclassification of 38 properties from Non-Contributing to Contributing. 3. Recommend approval to the City Commission of Ordinance 15-09, accepting the resurvey report for the Del-Ida Park Historic District, including extension of the Period of Significance to 1959, and reclassification of 38 properties from Non-Contributing to Contributing. Staff's Recommendation 4. Recommend approval to the City Commission of Ordinance 15-09, accepting the resurvey report for the Del-Ida Park Historic District, including extension of the Period of Significance to 1965, and reclassification of 48 properties from Non-Contributing to Contributing. 1st Reading: Tuesday, October 6, 2009 2nd Reading: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 Ordinance 15 0' 9 Del - Ida- Park ,Historic District. Analysis Alternatives Alternative 3: Alternative 3 would extend the POS to 1959 and reclassify 38 properties constructed through 1959. Revising a POS to the end of a decade for the sake of omitting structures built subsequent to this time period is only justifiable when the end of the decade actually coincides with the end of a historical period. The subject alternative would arbitrarily omit a decade in the noted POS along with the noted eligible resources from this decade. Those eligible structures built in the 1960s are of the Contemporary and Ranch styles, both of which are representative of styles constructed in the 1950s. These omissions would have the potential of compromising any future attempts at recognizing those structures built in Del-Ida Park after 1959 as significant. Based on the emphasis provided in the report (also noted above) on the Contemporary-style and significance of Post-WWII development subsequent to 1959, the Board may find that it would not be appropriate to revise the recommended POS extension from 1970 to 1959, while reclassifying 38 structures built through 1959, and omitting the 10 identified structures built between 1960 and 1965. Alternative 4 As an additional alternative, Staff suggests that the Board consider extending the POS to 1965, as opposed to the recommended 1970. The reduction to 1965 would maintain the reclassification of 48 properties, as no potentially eligible properties were identified after 1965. It is likely that properties over 45 years old were not considered as it is common practice to evaluate resources up to 45 years old, and not younger unless compelling evidence noting its significance has been presented. For example, when Delray Beach designated its first four historic districts in 1988, the POSs for those districts were established at 1943, and those eligible structure built between 45 and 49 years prior were classified as contributing to those districts. Based on the justification noted in the report regarding the significance of Post-WWII development and the emphasis provided on the Contemporary-style, the Board may find it appropriate to adopt the recommended POS extension to 1965, and reclassify 48 structures as listed in Exhibit A. Ordinance 15 � .el :Ida Park Historic Distric Alternatives Analysis Alternative 1: Alternative 1 has been provided in the resurvey report which was prepared by a r •lified professional knowledgeable in historic preservation, architectural history, and historic site surveys, among other qualifications. As a result of extensive research on the Del-Ida Park Historic District, a recommendation was made to extend the POS to 1970 and that those eligible and qualifying structures (48) are reclassified as contributing to the historic district. The justification of the POS extension to 1970 illustrates the time frame of the Post WWII impact on Del-Ida Park, not necessarily by the most recent construction date (1965) of a structure recommended for contributing classification. Based on the justification noted in the report (also noted above) and additional information and analysis provided below for Alternative 4, the Board may not find it appropriate to adopt the recommended POS extension to 1970. Alternative 2: Alternative 2 would extend the POS to 1970, and reclassify 38 properties constructed through 1959. Support for the subject alternative would arbitrarily omit eligible resources constructed in a decade in the noted POS and compromise any future attempts at recognizing those structures built in Del-Ida Park after 1959 as significant. Those eligible structures built in the 1960s are of the Contemporary and Ranch styles, both of which are representative of styles constructed in the 1950s. As a general note, it is important to consider that while these styles may exist throughout the City as a whole, there is not a large concentration of any single style within any of the City's five historic districts. Therefore, the protection of any of the eligible resources is important in maintaining the historic environment of each district. Based on the emphasis provided in the report (also noted above) on the Contemporary-style and significance of Post-WWII development subsequent to 1959, the Board may find that it would not be appropriate to adopt the recommended POS extension to 1970, while reclassifying 38 structures built through 1959, and omitting the 10 identified structures built between 1960 and 1965. Ordinance, 15 - 09 Del - Ida Park.: H storic District Alternatives Justification Alternative 1: "...It was not until the end of World War II that Del-Ida Park experienced a new surge in construction. Many new houses went up at this time, modest in scale, but representative of the latest trends in architectural design, materials and technology. There are many fine examples of Contemporary Style houses that were built during the post World War II building construction surge in Del-Ida Park...should be recognized and officially listed as contributing buildings...for their historical and architectural significance as representative examples of Post-War Era design. The post World War ll era was a significant period in the historic and architectural development of Delray Beach. ...based on the historical and architectural significance of the Post World War 11 period in the development of Del-Ida Park." Alternatives 2 and 3: These alternatives were requested by the Board in response to owners of properties containing structures built after 1959 and who voiced their opposition to the reclassifications at the HPB meeting of April 15, 2009. Alternative 4 See Analysis Ordinance 15 - 09 Del - Ida Park Historic District Alternatives Alternatives: 1: RJHA Resurvey Report of Del-Ida Park Historic District 2: HPB request from meeting of April 15, 2009 3: HPB request from meeting of April 15, 2009 4: Staff's recommendation Period of Significance Reclassified Properties Alternative 1 1970 48 Alternative 2 1970 38 Alternative 3 1959 38 Alternative 4 1965 48 ordinance :15 09 Del - Ida Park Historic District Contributing and Non-Contributing ❖ HPB review required for Contributing, Non-Contributing, and New Construction/Development projects. ❖ Review criteria is the same with the exception of demolition requests. The LDRs require that requests for demolition of Contributing structures submit the following: (a) Certified report from a registered architect or engineer documenting that the building is structurally unsound and is damaged beyond the ability to repair it at a reasonable cost. (b) Certified report from an engineer, architect, general contractor, or other qualified professional documenting the projected cost of repairing the structure and returning it to a safe and habitable condition. (c) Appraisal of the property in its current condition, its value as vacant land and its potential value as a preserved and restored historic property. (d) Documentation that reasonable efforts have been made to find a suitable alternate location for the structure within the City of Delray Beach to which the contributing/ individually designated historic structure could be safely relocated. ❖ Many items may be approved administratively rather than reviewed at an HPB Meeting. 1 rdinance 15 0 . ' Del Ida ParkHistorici'storic District Contributing and Non-Contributing • Contributing: A structure which adds to the historical architectural qualities, historic associations, or archaeological values for which a district is significant because it was present during the period of significance of the district, possesses historic integrity reflecting its character at that time, is capable of yielding important information about the period, or independently meets the National Register of Historic Places criteria for evaluation. o NRHP: Generally, properties eligible for listing in the National Register are at least 50 years old. Properties less than 50 years of age must be exceptionally important to be considered eligible for listing. • Non-Contributing: A structure which does not add to the historic architectural qualities, historic associations, or archaeological values for which a district is significant because it was not present during the period of significance of the district, due to alterations, disturbances, additions, or other changes, it no longer possesses historic integrity reflecting its character at that time or is incapable of yielding important information about the period, or it does not independently meet the National Register of Historic Places criteria for evaluation. • Ordi,naAnce 115 09 Del = Ida Park; Historic District Community Redevelopment Agency Programs ❖ Historic Facade Grant Program (Available for both commercial and mixed-use projects) o CRA purchases permanent easement to the building façade; grant funds (pur Ease amount) tied to building relocation and/or façade restoration. o CRA funds may be used as matching funds for other grants received for the same project. Recent program amendment permits that up to 49% of grant funds be used toward inter or structural repairs. o Success Stories • Delray Beach Historical Society, 5 NE 1st Avenue (2003 & 2007) — Relocate 1926 Bungalow and restore exterior; relocate "Hunt House" and restore structure. • Masonic Lodge, 44 E Atlantic Avenue (1997) — $45,000; Exterior restoration. • Elwood's Dixie BBQ, 301 E Atlantic Avenue (1993) - $25,000; Exterior restoration. 44 E Atlantic Avenue _ k 1i 7,f1,?� Aa i ( k tr ' y r' r f' f n S , , t-- .,t � tb°' `", (ry'�-; t1t• .i IiPr) rSi 4 r .r ) ,'l Eisi} tiff.4,I-F : 'i :11Vd ,1r A 'S [5...i B601S j i i } ; 1 R r t, ^,,r r �* ; *r, �,F fit+P J, an R„Rr 3*,, 4. 7", R4 J.:.,. y r Yi .�� - a-f r�t fNi4r N r" till,, k Y V �ti' F"fr `(it„4 /'^ 6 A pq3 SIw !`k'. !. �i !� 1 ra' .7 >f1� �' k ' VI'�7f,, r R ' , V r *�' ' S � .. .,a+,'; ,.`[s.,.° �= a tT ' y„i..9 ,. l> s ,, k i� 4 r r i i v s k:. w s ': ::'i, k ...*...,4'24'"4-."-' .t ski t 0, .,, PM t ; � 77t6' wy .p`.rA r r-'` A ,a t 7 E.' •/Itt Y -,,,, y""-- 1 p �."3 tr OW at, 1920s 1990s-Before 1990s-After * Program guidelines being revisited to see if there is a way to offer more help to nonprofits. I Ordinance 15 - 09 Del - Ida `ark Historic istr i ct Benefits of Historic Preservation ❖ Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Program — Contributing & Individually Designated o Exemption applied to City and County taxes. o Exemption based on structure's increased value resulting from completed improvements. o Interior improvements qualify o Include additions to contributing structures and/or detached new construction on a contributing property. ❖ Variances to the Land Development Regulations - Contributing & Individually Designated o Properties not in a historic district seek variances at the Board of Adjustment (BOA). o HPB variance criteria looks at historic nature of property. o BOA review requires basis of a hardship. ❖ Review Fees: COAs (non-site plan associated), HPB variances, and designations NOT INCREASED in 2009 with other review fee increases. Community Redevelopment Agency Programs •®• Site Development Assistance Program o Commercial Uses o Partial reimbursement for exterior improvements Ordinance, 1 5 0 9 • Del - Ida Park: istorAic District. Benefits of Historic Preservation Less impact on the environment and on infrastructure and reduction of sprawl. .:*Plays a central role in downtown revitalization strategies. ❖ Less neighborhood opposition. Neighborhoods are much less likely to oppose a project to restore a building that has been in place for 50 or more years than they are to the construction of a new building. ❖ Protects the architectural and historic character of buildings or neighborhoods. Greater property value appreciation than comparable non-designated areas. The fact that both residential and commercial property values increase in historic districts has been demonstrated by studies across the country, in communities that vary greatly in in designated historic districts than non-designated areas, occasionally they are the same, but in no instance are the rates of appreciation lower. It is the design review requirements of designated historic programs, which are responsible for this difference in value. ❖Encourages reinvestment. Not only do these higher property values generate increased property taxes for local governments, they also encourage additional private investment. i Ordinance 15 Q9 Del Ada ark 'Historic, IsDistrict Properties Proposed for Reclassification = �� I' Address: 204 NE 5th Terrace 'Jw' 'a/ P�5�4 ti• , ', a�� 011'' . l % % y+ Year Bu• ilt: 1947 �: '1 .yeiffi ',4 , ; 'i' `� Architectural Style: Minimal Traditional 4 , r� '? ,'y " �'� _ 444 Evaluation: f•• f F'4h1,:,, , 9 i F 4 1,fl ?r i :, ! ; ' ' e1,1 -+F 4 ----- ey �'SO7\ta . ' k 1 y � - tr4Fa *{1 1,{ PaC7—),, A/ i t 1` y7 'h ar y '.,, ,11;'1`24 6 �a15' ,,4 a k ,,, 3 1 a >h,1 :� � 4 '�'. w, ' fx,s "+' + `try" ,r + ''- �+ �.-. ' t� y�k, �� '4vlr �{S. TA�}. ��.. 4c.+3a�,1 `:�+.+t:.+.r ��kY{ t -.L.- 'Ski 4 -, wy J - may , 4 yy.„,e1 j t Yl ��ga��. ` ,,l e.: '�Cw � ky++ `"tip -��1 All'''' �'; '-' ,'' - - 4� ` a d,. % . �: • �a�fix Address: 216 NE 5th Terrace h �' F T - " ' n .;r� jk Year Built: 1949 I i. k- ',, i':i"Zo.', "..4. i, -: ./..7,f^' ..--.''' 1,„;,.,f 4 ''' ,t. i , I , i ' Architectural Style: Minimal Traditional �.K Evaluation: .'` '" IF , 5L -. - .. ''-, #+..,.de11�.w�."� ' F,,C,"i ' } a'' F t'SI:u �rtRa: i, 4tfiy „�.y li �.F ae "t • rdinance 15 09District ®: I Ida P a r c: Histo ric Properties Proposed for Reclassification{ I$A jA',i'll'iv- "If\k j' �, p rtr • Address: 228 NE 5th Street d Iii 1L� J Y y 1 :5 • r• 7`f, � ;, : a Year Built: 1952 , .,�.�fi" X` i$. d Architetural Style: Contemporary • • Evaluation:� 1 .,; ;d k � t�� tl . . .. yt„ z , d .fir 1 ' t ti ';I:rf-',;1?'.'",.',' r• r r ';� r h 1�"I' is);1, r' e t " 11' g�7�' i 0.'" +et , :i' y •z } � P,- i ", 7d 'y� f3rkyh �(l+� iT I G' , �}tits �y air day rot; �wrd t a � ' � .� wa+� � I�r 41 . i+� i di'�« ir,�r°7 ��jk�� f•� d :F�' 't �',� '"'-8-nvCFCbr.i.'- t 7 t r d ;.t -fey ♦rod 14 ''0 j sus y., � r r/ < 4p,.,', y'� i � ^+i ris,- ci_:'s I , y'. {.r f. }ti 3 ,4.,",. ?,'V,a�7 ##�Y ii t }� �r. 1 y hi, 4,• y � ro' T qy, ,tr., fi v iHA' J F } 4 Y - j 1 . f J„ t• I Y ,7,:'?,' 1.row. { ro2''�'4`.i%.. ro+>,e r +1'trw'' `'x ",''a •5� i yw, .7 t ,Iy,7i *1 k r'�' '7'V.' df '°`,Y'+ 1,- �w �+� � �'t^� r•,w▪' tr tii:`�Jr�� .ssy ,�! ?Wtr'"�, t ':zry�"� r1�,Q'> 17�,,�'�.a ,roe"?i e�'` ..� �j sf�°" � 4t4 • w„�` i��' tiK'. ,/ • Al t r4\-.k•� 7 r • "�•;1' -1 F ra•4 A.3' C.1,1 .`,i r( ,r.:,,� s ' C ti f 1 '�,�'Y, .a r ,:<.., a' 5r. 1 � r • s rr»'+r!rE44.. . .._ .SwS,�.s. +�" '. w � r"TM�'"�� •+'��fJ�� , ,,�� k�A �S. -> +,.,� i -r 1r3� Alt ,o 's .wswy, i r�,..„..,Y ..., YtT.„,,�W `. �+ o dig t�ro \ � •l �"'�9q�<-wx„a Zr 1•,M."7'-+ � Y:""y � Address: 202 NE 5th Terrace Year Built: 1951 �.� `,a�� atf,- ` "" Architectural Style: MasonryVernacular �,. �,�Pc _� Evaluation: Typical of 1950s contemporary designs. ,'',' � ' �F �; ' ''. 1 �� , Y t/" wr�L! i t:CJ r• i —Y � 4,i t t R "'` tRA i. !,,,I C •s.', d t �l�i --4 °��j�s 7 rJ1 171: (( r '. _"� a I '1`kX' '+.".-' y t r'./t. 'YY {ff1S' u ! tit, r rill_ ___ _ _ =0 Ordinance15 Q Del a Park Historic Distric Properties Proposed for Reclassification t Y f� �M1'1 1 It "� �)'�f�4� •!t Y�,�rt�'' d ¢� ,Ate y1•� r `( 1� Address: 222 NE 5th Street ,, ( ;r,r ' Year Built: 1953 1-•/ .fit'1 '� 1'{ FF �' " ,ti p ^� `` 4 I. • Architectural Style: Contemporary �4 55, a ti,,. ,.., :j I'Nn:, a 8 ;y F�;t.. +r 1.'� ,. , 1 ,/ {,i r ,. �., Evaluation: f rt � c ,`r , 'n,ll^ r a, s *r •-4'ati' f%n ; ,4,r - ..77{{1� f�^ yya 3 ' „ 'v C17- i 'a i ,4'o - i!' r R4 'h•• ,•-'�4 v -.r C i { •l s..r , r-•`• ra45 l .„Ark. Ii r,. '''''-',:is A} w, tom« r4•� � S' ��.t s�:j Lr t t-d P t � G t� � r�.F-;,, A.m. Y,,.. 1,9 ' 'r ,v rt-m r r s Ordinance 1' 5. 09 Del Ida Park Historic District Properties Proposed for Reclassification Address: 110 NE 5th Street Year Built: 1963 ,,. �;• Architectural Style: Contemporary '.''` Evaluation: ,,.,-,rri i i�,,,,- rc'tkr ,t'tt b tom` d t i kl , i {�y , 04' M1 9 b FT »+cyw V L. ! fd I 3' 3 . 7..F a k Y hu Y 'D r,, .,.wrF 1i F }y '} • 2y r f Y ti r a �., i w z '•r a `+ d t'4 � t .I�irvr. �* lif. r1. '�. .. .. z; .,k.?a+t�'�i4.s'u�`M✓�.:'.r3�-•�¢. �F.... �_;+.w. ,:v' `A .::'d� i • ti ,�'r"�` � • f r r ojr=' .t_�.�1X. r.k i 1., f iC �3. fi• olt.- ,t J"' , r�T'Tj; I n , Ji Address: 215 NE 5th Street • N ' "' `f�� I tX Year Built: 1950 1,,', ,.0 k �* '�: ,,' tc 'i� �.1 ; ' " .'.. 'r¢ 1,4zt i °,''. t iti's ` : Architectural Style: Contemporary ! ;:� � Y ! � :. r ��, r Evaluation: , a4 , i 'f r P ti ;�`r� r y j� _ri F ,".jiSx41�-? �- i� 1�fk 'IF ; , + Z" 1 4+ r yN 'Y{'.f�i a .c f Ffti 4'' 5 _1� ti sr � ...�,o.,.. .7•-p..;:6' '6.1c.. ..r- Lte\..�v),7tt_� .�.?X,.e�.w 3b,ai .0 ..r_�._'' Xrf%r�� i �.,l:ir,� is 0 9 0 d i 0 a ii. c e s - 111111 , Park, . Del - Ida _, _. __ HistoricDistrict , Properties Proposed for Reclassification Address: 102 NE 5th Street Year Built: 1963 Architectural Style: Contemporary Evaluation: )„.. .,.. ' ,.... ;..-, ,,,„,t,e,--•;,---,'*,—,,,,,,,,,,,,',,5,'„,Li',;-"e41(etitir4ti --if,*,,,;'Iq',,'4,"ti '.."....":7•A' `:1".110::i.,,Ski,.t::14- ' ..' ,.. -,*--—,--.......„,,,4,L.;. ,..,,, 4-415.,,f,,,*,..",•., 1 ,,, ;; ',,':" .1•4.1.6, ::444''''' ''-•,:,:' ."-Ta:.' •"''.4 4 '''',.'. , .". ..1.' „ '''''' $:°'' • .. I 1 , 1: ' : ;It,,;:;11,‘,". ; ',i1,21 1,••4"'4;;614.,;,,f4;,..,,,...,.7 1!.1. , , 1 ,„kv .a.'''...,l'-'1'.1'', • ''' --1 l'e•,r,,iit"%i:f ',',3‘, ', ....,4,v.,......e.%-', ,,..in,?-q i..4.1,:`, .....7'f4'-•:4;t....:,- ,1''• • L ... , , ', Haz 7:'" '1,''';'.. ,•, A,41,".iar4'., '''' 1#1,4''''''` rt.,,, p nook ' 1-,,,-,F,•'-17."*.. .- '- .:`7',. ,,, di,...!`„,-"»i;,'•-- ta, z7 ,' ;,. '' ' ';Zh'.... ,',4' '3,; . ''''''1.44,,,..4i,pftly •' 7-41:4.4' ,i-... 7,-;,:•;1'• I 5.,' ,''; e 4 4A,,MictP.,4.44.",04.-4,e44,444.,,, e„,,,,,,,,,,,,.4, -,..,,.. .t.,,e,,,,,„.,r...144.,,,....:40,.,,,s,,,,44,;4•14..t.,,,A,,pt,..04,..4,,,,,,,,;,,li,t,44.,"•70„..,,,,,li..,,,,,71,41,r).:4;41.0.44.---„,r114,,,,-1,.kipo,,,17,4",,01.4,540,,,,,;:i.,:irtl,,,,z,..?!7.1-.,,,....4,7,,,tr,x.,,-?.,,,,,1:,..,',,i''.",'..1, ,;=',,-•,; i'.(s. ,-, "reA ). t o'"./3".. 4 et.04‘,...,;..T',..•,;.r,:f'V', 14,.`,..kj'1,,:,•':,^14. '7',,,' .," ,„,,,,::',1""'0', „•••),'''',',,"74,'';,:""'".•'.* "' • ' I 4,.';i• -'''': l'. '',,:rf'."••',.....•..e• . '4 ,.. •.4. . ,.,',.'-' ',,, .' , ' -. '' •...' ' '' ." • , ik '../".":'-'..,..,4;.v*•*.le-''', •,,.',.--"''•('-' - •c'''i.t.t.) ./t , -•.. - $74.,,,,v,,.4 „, ,-,,...' -,„.'., ,,, .....: -,, ,.., ... , . , ...;'":v;f4.- •,t9k-L'. .. ,, , '-..-44--4L- -;:tIrk.„4-Q'',,. *".,"e.,„ , 7; . ' ., " - • '- ,-‘''fl ,11 ,40,t-',. , ,‘,r,— R'',: ""t.;, ,..4.,..,*-,•!;t...-,ivtl„fri.v',...,-, 7 vt.,17 403egite '3c •'''' ,' 'it ''I, r.;.-...'k(,. i.• .';t1'. '' • 4 • ' .,,,b -t4f.:',%.14:''''.' " ".. ,";>'..n.,--.1.",,-;.',..p.,„,,•-' -s•-'.`"""' ' At,'ev ,''.2• . " X.,..A.,; • ' :,„•4:%?'',4' '„"1);72':,,P;1044 Address: 106 NE 5th Street .,;','T'-t,..,1•• , .',''_ --,.,,,,,,'";t:iii(lt!it 41?),...- ' ,..qi.,,-w., T„„', , , pri:',.• j:P ' ,:g.,,;( Year Built: 1963 Architectural Style: Contemporary k ''f' ,A xr 1 ; .I‘, i tit ri.i r,*••15J'71,1,),'I' 4 ...,./ .• F , , - ' il:'•• .1,0 1,.1‘14-tle''3, (t i 1'oi'..."..e.',.,, 414k''1.1 "If p.1. ' J.4 ' , ._~— '.•..,;..:, - ' '' 3 - t f:1."-v....1 .p;.'.',. '..''";0$41•' iffg'i frr,' '' ' j,if,..:', .1,1.2 '',..3 Evaluation: 11.''''', ,L..:-,,I,,',:-.1.4fi.r.-4,4,..-...4:4' ' .. '',--.4''''"••:.L '''_ • . . ;;•VP.7. 2.-...3 11 4V;If, 1:0%;'41:l`',,; F:tt'"'' .7",.' ..,•r..."..,';..,• ft.. tL^"N,,,, .,.„1.,„,,;,,,4,ye ,.c,.,14,11,,,,, ', '4't.' '' Ordinance 1' 5 9 , Del Ida Parr Historic district; Properties Proposed for Reclassification li�, ., .�., . y 41;T�? pr;,. .N, , ! # ' ., - � Address: 18 NE 5th Street i t ! Y , a �c� '''d t t «ky t } `"f�� ';� , t°' `¢ �mr,�;�; { ' `\�i,� ``;; � # Year Built: 1963 'k�r ;{ 4F '*.f'(.� Ott 4.' cg,, , , y' �,,,,A, ., , , 4\ a �. ), . .4. ,, w, 04: i,:fi�0, ,,, +`�� r ,,��`•, �; j Architectural Style: Contemporary '1' e 1, ;.fit? YF F fit ! ��{ � �' /jai ! ` Evaluation: T 1s s Yy,v ,--- ). f��S4i' a ' 4 'i.""F.)' fir' ,�qi, • r ' '. } rs f fa ,;yt�f .41 1- % !,' s Li '' '-4 `I ' !, t� ,4. , t+mot Ir '�1� > b '"i,, 21./ ti !`it ra µ ,•fie"' 1 1 a _ r , LO. m *fi J., ; h � yx=;'t tvli1 '/ } r �y �a ` ,,,� ,k, w yy'i 4 ',Vi t! �s�yti t�� ¢ Stx%,, inTY� k.._..."Si.F y, p vu } f:t ;�' iyp. p 'r K '� t Y !¢" r. ,, �rQ � y w'A'2 �,z;,,k,: <"�'S ',r- ''"' 4%,�i k,,," , ,t„„.a't'-,y% ,,3,,.+"Yr7pr ""�•FMdM't" �j y i e-,. 1� •'�' `"•jtftfi��1��i..�'f � ''t,mod* ..,.t'a'�'" Y 1"r. �t � �t �.... Fr g. N i..�,I.'T� `/ Sri " •; �� . Address: 22 NE 5th Street Ji i j��°r � � �r ,� t'r'4'n -r--- "'�FdT'EEaB ve,,4„keMIC"m+-it- 44 .+ ,r`�',-". u. '.Ss.. � (�' �t� t� '��.�� Year Built: 1963 : , • • s } f x � Architectural Style: Contemporary a ,,, t� �,,..„ s- ,,, ,, P. `-oft Y,.k.^4 i�t, :t7 { 7't Evaluation , ,. :ti , b tyi Yr�r;t� o- " ftDr't,7 ', , aa,r .tfx ' Yf '.-+- '.s 4r r ii�§ t w i t , 5 i '�b w`�`�'17 ; .;,?,• 4,'t`tv y s, i+fl�'s J't'}.� .�' ,sir i't i�,- 4':�t yP'{d"tf`tA�f rY'� 'f;,, '7 y��t=�''' 1�,7t�:a 4 . : .E. i r i° ilQd c Properties Proposed for Reclassification Address: 10 NE 5t" Street Year Built: 1963 '�� Architectural Style: Contemporary +', r ; 4 Evaluation: r I. �,M • 6 1(fy e 0. y r 1 1 .�'+ �tr y; .s a ye a .�,M , �"z"t • 1 4 �1 f , j.k.y �ttT s .�., s 1 ". '_+u � 11� Y Ile— a.-8 x r i h r'+ t ,• r '' x aa ' ""�sc4- • r '''- ?. A`., ,' '-'''''' -YIV*4441'clftti -le-at 40,t,,,, ;,..s., r ), ,..., .„. 4;m tom" g A Vt 3�Y kN " i ,k _` ry a r...«t' .4��I.,<,.7{ a'-F..wvt,�`w`w 'p'.. ." r yy", f t =: pi qi ,l `.","4, .gyp Nµr ,..i Nth+ f. -'6�,*.. 'f. tT,' ' � .,'•:�../v4 ../;1.,,,M;.'� ;,iItt.+ , YvvG �'t� 1,,,y'Y ` ""w,.4,',. x' n,. E' t( rt 1'1":1 w .-t; + t 'ti;'*.li' ?v..t�;�� «.:' tt, , r 1,�J_�, r t?.'�„°� a '+'r."{`, p44”,t,'t 'S.�.! `t'+,,n `.,r '`•., 2 , -,'Is �`,.i•. i.. ,� ,,� . p ��♦ r z..,;44y *YK., ; '` '.'- - ... r �^rkc .±tst.,.a.A4Yr X ..w14 w ., t + :. 4. J.'t.; a i y .�x,.,°�ji '� a�). ��. , .._.. ;t drF; , �� 31 �� 'S�i��` �` Ate i '��t �f 1 L t v 11 At t} i r '�Yt '^' s^I'"�`".., , q tr Address: 14 NE 5th Street rF ,,a�. #)^�, �,,t � is:F. T, F s,t lr �, t, �i1 �,�}S, y�t4y� i` �+ t tY` ti �r �{ �11 �? ��rt f 4,1. 1� pa a x F `^:g3.n+ rt , E Year Built: 1963 ; tis 4 kT x;y " t • , .,• f , "�,, -�.. M , , �� :,r 4 .( � :! Architectural Style: Contemporary , 1 ;I., ,Y ,°<,Y,, 0 ,41. , . s' ; - I� �. Evaluation: �` , �nx�. ,. t�� a;., r � >• xrrx � � a „, ,�� 2 as 7 dE „ b qq r ., Y, -! dam n u y '+ter �` f f,?0-i,-,.',,—'7-4'-„.,:''.••s•',:M7',1.11,2,'.+V',—-----.,-..(,=--.,='---:-.°'=. .- 4'''' "1-' }Jt r 4 ._' 2 's +tr1,y .tea t F O, r } ti S: Ordinance 115 : 9. . DeI. Ids Park Historic Dstr1c: Properties Proposed for Reclassification , , YP .i r ,aa;r #, ,-m- r T,�rj1 s w�..�-eTSP'EgK `� n ; y w Sf roF. h :r ` x w �"--' ti vi r 1 i �" �'�.* 5G 'z'i %&`ro`� t,�s p',d ,t% 5th • �#,4 ,,_ �� ,' i c , ,,`- ,,< Address: 225 NE Court , ( r a e� • t r'f � � � # r�,Y� � ��' � � � Year Built: 1947 ��S�•H I# �� , ¢t 5 4d � � '4t t f � a � b t 'A • r+� . � _Fsii,• � t% S �� 9 a _.S� �t. � tr a a 7z �',-✓t1. 1 � � t�. 1 , -.. o ,t� ` r Architectural Style: Masonry Vernacular v a 'k ;- ij` ,4 ` 1 t f 1 i� t ?,� ?,M1 k 7 i ' ' 2 '" ° } Evaluation: associated with the developmental 11,..� � S ' ? 4 , �y t*o r �� ,a s. r a ` �. x- '�' history and exhibits the architectural elements of ryt 4 -Ida Park area dur g he 1940s. - , ,�, � �`` the Del-Ida i n t r t , {jp' ,1 ^to- ' -y tf• 9R, + 'o- h t ii?r Y i...;a. '4.t.nl�C 7>#.¢ +C'1 •t e kt. r..rT. �� t�r r R1�'gt'?n=� A'tk il,,to tl � a1' � r".,40i'i4i, iti, t at'"T t�,t j S k0„.7 j J' y�. ..^* r , 'l a#y �• A-'24'.a, P'r .'j jd "'*, s roy 'o- #�•" . 7 A a&c Y�;!.( ` *i„.0,.c✓e r.-"k'i4. N t .: . ,y yy-Pr )"3' `t/ y,,.4"Q jai:.: .,# • '1.•. ,fib .7� : r `y! , 7.t am T 11.,�`.�tr1if w :rt?! e�--.,.� .:\-u, td-,-,: =r J. 14x \+y; c:z..,., , • �i y "`�. 40.„ Address: 226-228 NE 5th Court k_ t F � ` , x.>z#t� a" 4'- le " n v 6 J �y NI'`l �, �- t Year Built: 1953 ;j ,t L � f �: ! 'NT • t' ;', Architectural Style: Contemporary *' •-• T' ;-•, Evaluation: Typical of 1950s contemporary design. } k ) T'a*ii - 3 'taw r'. , �t S E y b t.ck'f ;; , T� tM, y __________ Ordinance 15 - 09 ' to (District ric _ De • • . P rk H s eclassification _____ Properties• Proposed for R , .., " • 5t" Court Address: 215-217 NE S*•.1 l'f14'' ''' , Built: 1952 ,,, Year ) ' ''.! Architectural Style: Contemporary it.,47.44A•'-; , 9. ‘, of 1950s contemporary 4,7, ( .., , --. Evaluation: Typical -, el„., fil.11,,,,,../ ; ,, A,,,,'Ci,,..P.ifsWes,'.t.i.,,,YWAffir1.74,i',';', • l',0Y,\A,1 - •.•,'.s itp,4* ..`-'',i'''`. ..,t....1 1 '',".14,r. , 'q'''/,' ..,...:;„.,-;-.1,:z4".-.,-,z17,-.,,.„;,,,.. 15.1.-0,?- „t' v ',, -...,,, ., - ,\,,,,,, . •,(. ,,::%-.1,-,,,, '.,s- ,....,t.zift,N:-.-\--`'1' • :' - .g.3,tI-17,5.,';+'';' .. •.. !`e7 designs. \ ,, ,, .:.,:14 :•.^.,...'•,,:i*ttr?,, • ,,'',. --.::3,,, .•7,.;,1.:,•:'. ,,,.,v..,, 41 .!,,, k•,,,..,„,,,(...,,, .. '.... *:, es.' , ,s .. -7:111‘4„, 'l , ' . S't, t,1- '.41 -9,,lr 4'',P ...1:1, .,`,:er,,'%.4- ,, '" • • r '1-'j 't,' 41'4 " - I fr '),',11 ''' :,''''',1 ''.4`*`',6 ''.,..,«.",` • , , N. 4 i.,"i -,',, \ :i .-''-^ - ‘,"• ...." .k'' . ' •,••.3175...rOmr„, ••, • '•.„):4".1.2, ,,,,,,, 4, ..;;:t•:` .. , *,.,,t1;q,•1 fil.., 1 ,* '.,,,• .,,A 14, ' 1:4 N. ' ' '' ‘If ''"7"q, t,'„t•' I'— , _„,'' f.) ,•I 1\k "' 1_%/112/4 '\ti nr- ,''''' .1116-11 '' '' .. , '' . 7 I ' ,.„,iii .,-,,, ,,,,, -,-, ., ., .., ,:-Avt. ' ..: - , - . - ... .. , _-.' ,.. , i, ,..,:" A ,,..,. 4s, , •.:-...4,..!...$11f."0.,:.:.1 .. , y „ ,.,,,AN 'i ' •••..1 '''14.4., ',, s -• ' , It. .'• -. '''-'1.,., ` ,•'.'1 '1.'1,,Wftil*,"4.1e41,- ' f'. 'q'Y''''' '' J V' ;* I ' . i s 14,. .,,,,,,,,,Ar4,„„ , , 4,4 4,4..,,,,,,ki. ,.., ,,,r1,....,,,,,,',.,A.4.y4,s,,r,,<.' .'',A -s;. .r,J,Va ,,,,n „, ki .. - 1..,, A,Aiz x.A.1 .,,-. A• .--i41.-!.5' - t 1, '.., -;',. y.- 't ('PM V. ‘•,:"1. *,'"-.1,r,' ,4.4.Wipt,r,,',Q.,''1/2•• ' ',Z-'-,;,..Z r•••'..:' ''` ',...,-, --, ''','' ' ,.:'' ••,'t". ' •- -• 1.4f 0'7 i,'-. ' ,..`'.1. ': " ' '•^ ?:'‘' at ',." •\•,,,,' ,' 1 ililtl', 4*It: .4, ‘,It's,:.Af:: ','7,1r-4-''-'-'t ''.'-' .'' ""' .41.—:::*!' ..,---!:,---...-,:-Idis'—''''7. ":. _, - ', -c4t.--'-, • ,--''.. _ 'Is ' 7" •• t:•,;"4.' •l '•,,,,,,,,*`tli\, 1.,;:l.:' -> ,''t.., • ,,,,,:--- , vr,yv,i,,,,,,,,r,,,'Thyfo.,,,/101,,', , _ ' , ' ' . - , 7,.,....---—' ' .', ,,I.'''...."' ''7,:f.A•iitsW, •,t3,tei.i,, 4.," fri. "'IN\,\t y\ , ,1"..,,..,e. 6. Vt,;,,,Ifili 1,4, ' VA ' ' - ' - '‘-'' -1 • .. -..' ' 't$;54t,44" '''i'"' c'N''''<.".4.tit 1-;7*- i'''1, ,.. ., -/-ilti 14;.k '••„.,.I 1,..^.. A TE4'0,, L;', \\\,,,,, .: ,..., ,, .......'.•"..-' rt..,4, 1„,..,,*0. ,' •.',Anv.,._44' , -, / ,,,,,,A,..- .:‘ir %,.• .•, .4.,k .1,,,i,,,,,....., , (,.. ,•1 .„. 4,', .` ,.',,,t...",-.1,-, ''''4 , ,=, '-..':. *Pa'', • A,r,.. ?' ";' 1` "4.1/41 ',' ..-)`..'eov."L ',-.1 k )) v,7'Ill,` o,.,11.1ZVT, .L.o.its vp 1‘,2 r i. ,..,..,„ 1" i91,1,1 . ,1, _; :: Address: 223 N F C Court ;....,,,-...141,, , „imit i i rs,..h*,.I .:,--4i- ,,,-, . t.,?7 —— —th .-,.,...,,.,,, ,i,,,...\i, '14 si f4, -- •minoA, 1 4k,- -.- .,,,J.., '..,, . .tl..,'3- . ,,.,6,1‘ ,,..,15.4i...f,-, i• •'*•,,,', t•., ' , e 4 '',' • ,. . „-, .1,, Year Built: 1947 '' '''• \i , - „ ' t. '1 Style: Contemporary Architectural • . - - ,,k , , -,t, ‘, •-, ' ' - '- -' - ' — ' I of 1950s Contemporary designs _,,,,, i' , - , • ' _,,,1 ' .--.. , . ; :,. ,, ... , , i, ..-, • Evaluation: Typical 4.4' •I — , r'S ' ,-,- ,„‘4- .t:i0.%•;:i,,-,i',4i"."-.'y :.,-•-y 4- ' . , lli lot • Ordinance 15 - 09 Del - Ida Park Historic District , Properties Proposed for Reclassification k' ' \ Address: 703 NE 3rd Avenue , -4. , , I.' t ltifi • , t .' tl \ Year Built: 1955 '1''' \ -.. ' Architectural Style: Minimal Traditional Evaluation: Fine example of Minimal Traditional style. In '' N,='• ' 1 ----.--.,,,,__-•-- • ' .. -- --•.'••.,,,A.-‘'• - I' -. ' ______ '-' -- --' '''''I'' context and scale with neighborhood. .,..______, __,_-___ ::-.7 ;.,-4 ,4 4 III a ...t.1 i e4 _ ....,- ,s,f--.., on ..,,, 1!..,: . .., . 1 s min ,., , i- _ ._ ,i. , ..,•,,,-..- ,' ' 111 II --.- ' '- 1,....; 4 —•--' 1 \ Ok*.fft - " ' ' .,-• , ' ,' . 1. ,, ' 1 ,,,, .4ty .i: f ,:`.." .. 1 " '''''I's1'-'47340f1461•VRAIII'P,',';z4"-r"...^-rvw.',,..,-,1 ,:frp",..•,;-‘0,z',7,74M-`,./,,w"''', ,`",•:„. „.,:.,,•'.-i ",.,.;„A i, ,,..,";. '‘ :' - )•„t,Art,4-, -,. i••.:1-,%,...4,4,1,;-,,..r... q4ii!',a' • ,it'"'i.44%;1-44'411,14etkiidkv,::;;•11'-'''''', ..')=41111:•,4,••" :xt;v:$7.e.g.,,,r, ,--i!,„v,,,,,,4p,..%i,:;,i'i.:, i4:,;,.t-,,,,r; ....,,,,,,m,,,,,••%;,„irprtlzo,r, .:, ft..:Air.;c...4.fie. ,.t.,,,f, 4; i • .., ;14 ,..., 7,7,„?.. 44;,,.... ,,, ,i,,I)cto,,,r,*t..'A:4'1.44,4'. t:..;, ,'::,t1:,*o'* :zirlart, '"4:.''',.:", ' '),1,0%7,'''="5:,.-^ '::'7,-, i.'-‘101*:'4'?0T4'41'.. '''''rf.,':11...ti44:1 4 Y - '..:..%/I -;.,..., $•-i;F:i1--t;trY •'•,,,;444.64,,,' -..' ..ktit,N,„•,,tc-tAtill. j,""•1,0,, ,',\,4.0.10,4,..11,1k-"' •T•1", 1„/A,F.-..f•si .7.! „ .,,..,-.--;.."•••-•:,--,),t'' t , .4„;iL 0•PI,..4' - 0,t.h......1.1. -„,l,„,,,,-.•• .,,,,,,,m,.,.4,2,,,, t,,,,..,,,k,4,,,.„,,..., ,,, . •• ••,,,•• ---.----,—--.,- , , ,,„ ,,-it , ...,,,,4'.., *4,.,r Po. ',....r,„/,,,..„ .;,\JW.4' .' T.4..,. '.1.4,•, ,, '1'44 '' ...dWr. V.>k,V...) ",. , ' s-..—.'"^`.—: — ••,,:;''' s:". '"''"CA s'•Ito,' .,*:•"1. ''' -- '' '`,- ,f. Address: 209 NE 5th Court ' ' l'''. . //•-•'. 1-----____7-_--2------------4,011-011111e441Wwilwal--.-i' ............,_______ ' Age Year Built: 1949 Arc hitectural Style Frame Vernacular Evaluation -.- „.•_.,.._,-.N_,,,,,.,,,,...,,i'.;.!I„,.-.-v,-_,,.y',e,,T.,,-I: „.•:-.,n r'f;,-. .---__--,--z_7;,_--__7_--,. _-,',,„ -,,.,, : , , ;-,•:.'"'''').1`..1. 4.'''',4...* I-4 :-..-.", ;— .''1 ; $ '7.'' "'.SI04.`•-,,,i• "reV.,44,v`..%'',.'4,. ,4 ‘. " '.••,:"4:::.:'1-•-.1:'=":`7,•,•-".,...1:4tI .-,t-4 It*. 'Ag.'•11.,.'•,•,,t't, 4v7f. ,, = .s• , — ....., , .''••=-:-..-•„;-,...,_ • .....,z„;•",,ily., ,;;A:),„ 't*..--4•'..,„%P.7 41 t• ',..• .. '''' .••m•,'...1,"•.'n,,,;,v -..4• •".",4"t4''',''''•41.4. AN, 1,c,-oIr ,,.1.4,,,..r..` t'ri-i,:..-.:- --tt - '' '-',7": ',14 ".. ,_ ... '''' "4.4 Cs",=,:s..e"'"'`A--'7* .*• lit.l. A.,.,,',-,,,,r4,,k J'-'":1;--,..pt ---,-*._ . - "._ ' --,' :,'- '. , = ."-.7---"sf.,...? ..?.,.;-e.',"'::.-rf-ArratC-4.'""; •-?,°W,-,Vdies.-',:f,}".1.-, - ' ---' *„.f." ‘f '-, - -:',....!.:,;,,'4,4,),',.4:11";7":5'"";': A k,.''21-0:-:4( - ,4-4AF,-""'!•:-N7-17-'*'-,•'', ••••• •"-,:.-'"'• ,'-.'• ', , ' - ,,t-rio: ...,*•,....t% ....0f4Z. A'A'AbkIe&i-A. .-0.--, . 1 Ordinan ".ce ' . 0 Del • Ida Pare istoric Di::stric Properties Proposed for Reclassification �� . LMM:7pNI,��°{�F� l ,( 7r� (/' r t In;:`I f>4 {� "�`'{s(p��'' `*"1'°`�: ` k,� ' ; ' < Address: 543 NE 3rd Avenue li : AA t.ey'� , - k itF AIR' , it �*I` ` y1 �\ vti °� :Irt,��r Year. Built: 1955 !t .,,,, rilyrkTAty `,.. ,I '',01 Al::' './ irt f..i..,,, ,,„'\",..41. • ` �t A R 4t a f 4 Architectural Style: Contemporary \ ‘Akk �� '.t � { t� rn { ;;} t t.', \F \�' . ;;� 1, , 1,$ I)k4:< � " »., L' � Evaluation: Typical example of 1950s Contemporary r�, 1r t,I e �E.ti,, ,,;�w��„�.��4s' ��1�1"1" �,��3 ' '.,r'��" � �� ..�= Y 11` i N ' ;. lid ,;�, design. In scale and context with neighborhood. leg"gf} I , ,.I':I ,, i * ', ,-,. e ,u, r r q:.��\� g g � �1y L 1J a�� i .. •'"!' �' e� ,r fi A ,a1 -' "e',„ ,. , 4 ,. "tk\ • = .y J� ,,,`� r ./ •43 f'F ,1, �f,.iy. P,f",i:', ' ,y'1'�,ipL �,�'�� -. �'.<f,,(- k *5,—:S-t i rf 7 ,,:z 'r,-. Y. + 7„'�r :yti a.': d' r K;rf .�'��? ,; { ;l�" ,` ,.._e., E h • • +, J r� k Vr C', `t f''4<C. .A T x$, , + rM K F"8 f�'(.1 f� ;a..• '� tt. '\,,, �`y,. .:1$._ ^',s( .:il't o, f_ .. _.r.: } r'c.+ `, yg r t 1 r' �Y'� . t "'t�• r ' ♦t, �, r t.:1.4,1.,0,?.,. •1,.1;..• 4.f..,•741 ,•re.1-: ,,I;;-‘1.7.vh-}, ,,,t„.. ...,....\ \ i ! y.�4 'r a f �r �I y k Y�v,.y d,a r N{ § .�" .1 111 \\ _ ,� ei'f'' F�! '� s i 3 it .t J l�. ',C.e�'h/�% ;.e',�' �7"}`,�{'� r.Y,' Oda v a� ��at�k. Y'" i '' :.¢iT ct��,,w ', t;4lrr 1 f'r{ I/ sue'' tt� In tidq ,13�R.+rp47' .vr'r. .r4'w • !1..I .:b 4,i 1 ,' a ".. r i 1 tit 1r-. '"'tt"k a i ;,_ ' ,,, i t + 1 j' Address: 701 NE 3rd Avenue yy� Rya♦y , 11Y11... 1 t �,� 4}, 1 ' } tI ',. :. l,,, �t Dw I u',l ll r MVA Year Built: 1961 .r� r, t;fill' Architectural Style: Ranch �� at 1 , "�1 Y o-rrxy 3 Fs c 1 �I 1 li : i , Evaluation: Fine example of Ranch style. In ` g. _ I,i; 111 ' ,1i1. � i( .1�'ll (� I , ' "', ,�l,,Ir ,',' 3; t� ' context and scale with neighborhood. t' q, '5 ' :, • r.4, '-" i. -"° r l �' ` ` `�o . •%r e'-i�i. s �,�y �}„k'��j,!'s�'a+.r+, `r,,. ,,.rga.4411, 14 7i*rtf 1,`I t#" ',o'n. +," t 'r Y 1 J p r��@ 3 t b 4,: 74 rfAr ? .y•• 1,44 {� r� k,',ea+( C. P e t -04.zlF,' t 'r't1 .:4 Zrg- >,,, 4'♦-4 v - ,6 h.', �•.,up� ,. i Y',-FY{, r j t .�^4 N>t'� u .F-;< 4,*;�4 t 1 `l � 0� - '44,`I,,. v't�,4 y,,,�1Y Ordinance 15 09 1 . „ Del - Ida Rail( Historic District Properties Proposed for Reclassification ,....,, ,,,---1- -"7-7-i"47::•:-• l'.0,„•,71r'4„-p•fl -, .-. , '`oi„'-i"-,,it1),4-,*, 4 1 ,,,,ff'-',•,,,'? t,'•:m'O: ' 41:-..„*C.• .,* ,. '• •• '."1-,'1'..e" s(4t•'v' ' f'''.14 ''''' ''',1 '4'"O'F/ ' ' ''H'..1'; Address: 706 NE 2nd Avenue . 4,...,...... ..,i , ,„-, , 1, ..„, ,„,1,1,qi. : .4,, . .: ...-, ... r. , .-,..,..... . , l- .,,- . ; ,.0. 1'.. 2k .- , ,,'-:-0-,' (I. Year Built: 1947 •, t , . kot-,...: .,..1 . : , ..4.,,,.. • --' e''''' - Y ' • 2. , ."'''4`1`... Architectural Style: Minimal Traditional .1.. .„,„, . . .. .%.,, -0 . - .,,'-, • Evaluation: In context and scale with neighborhood. '77'R.''" -,r;•... . , „.., ,_ „,t,' mr,..-1,ti.-. t' , '%."..,1•,, l .. A --' 7-:: „);!4'' -, ,'• •• -„ 0,•,:t,-;-; ,' , • ' - - "::...... ' ',• -'-f-.'-E,-%- -' 1 '',P ',' ,,...,' ''' II,i '` , 'i• '` i A',., 7-7-'94 •---:-''-- '` • ,'''?.•'-- 1 ' I 1 , *at ' S- i-›, ; •, 1 -7-±;i- - o'lik - r--r -rr--7 ti.i, .1 ' , ill 0 ' .... .i..7.,r,,,,,.....e.,. __,i,..,. 1_,.1,10,e.:7..... .J.,„ , „Ikr,.. ',...,_'-:-.-,---7-'';'-:•v-s."'k . ..., ..,.1 - A. x ..,_ . ,--- 71,;11"...7:,;.F.,!-.4.-Z.,thi,rit!, Ao ,- w,,,I,, e.i.1,,,..... .,!•',44,•.41.,,1414,,,, *or It, ,;.. .,%- k" ii '',,i'; -.; '.•,.,,e .: 4. i,- .-1, ii• - .._,:...„‘:—T.: :i:";:61::;bt'l'i.''';1:4 • '1.1',05-'0;10,, . , . , . : ,,p.15:51.17 1,-----'''z'',,,,,_-- 2 l'.--, -.• --_ Address: 524 NE 3rd Avenue ,-,,',.:,.. 't ,,,-;---,-- - -,-:-..-----,-- ---z.-_ ,c,,,-- -- -.'''.' '•°'k.,'''7:. ' Year Built: 1947 1...,„ ,., --____ ., 1,,,s,,,,,„. ,..s,, 4,11, L. . -•-1.;• •'4, • -i,' 1-,- , ,,,: -• , `ri}:,', "4.' "'"-'4""''I, / ',':14' ''.'A'. •"fr;‘,'Ir'- ''i'C."'. - ' Architectural Style: Frame Vernacular , ...;,, _1,4,.:,.-- , -!:-.,r ,.-„-••--,,-:;-•r ,4,: .,torr, . ..Y.., •. .:;„,„..., -- ,.' 0 ii 11.4.,..-.0 '''' 4 ...r.,m7-4.—lig in----=--.4eft,•4 pz„f,,,,,,,. ' . ...T..- ..r.:-. -,:.,. ,.;,-.-, .A.A6. .1 2:•,,.,,i Evaluation: Typical example of Frame Vernacular. In i,._., , , ,.i i ,.=-5,;c.........‘.....,4,6741,k...*.:e zi,c.., - -• ,':,i''',-,,,,,,,;',.,..• - •s:-.4,,..,! scale and context with neighborhood. ' ',4,-,41:7:;4•11/...,. r,;'• ":,'"Tr..4'i'l,i'''.:PK:A.'..''' .'' ' '/ ''•—.5.'..e---7 •e",i,.../.,-, . ...% "11,, ),..,,..%; ,1-V 4..v 5.1011', .,..;,i. ;.,: , 4'''' ':f, •' •-''•. ' -'..:••;- ,-- ---- • .,...i.,11.,,,,,,,, ,, ,r,,-r-, •.„4:),,,,, rio,,,,-.../i‘ ' • , • • , „. • ,....., ,-..: • ,.; ••,: . :•=c,,13.'!-•••••••-•\,,, , s - ' - ''• '7,.4...." ' ' ", .f.iss6,. - ' -- ' • '''. .-' , ,•''' iirl ' • .1 s 1.)1x:', s l't4, ".,',;,"?4,7-,.....---:-, -.,,..' , •'''•72-'-',1,fk-•-• •-r'.-'' 17,-...40•-1 ' ••• ' .:•••v'•',4:''' • 4 , e•-.:." •; ',, 1 ..,,, ,,,,,,,,,...... .-__. _ - , , , ""--41:-&••••,-_,-'4 ,'... ,.: •:'•.,,, :..,- ,-:, ,,- ,,,,,,;#456‘1.,4,<,‘ ..,:,:,.,.....4:,,r, ,f 1 1 Ordinance r�� 9, Di trict Properties Proposed for Reclassification Address: 412 NE 2nd Avenue Year Built: 1955 V ry q# k 'a .,Y { '`"t Y ,?Fru" * Architectural Style: Ranch x 4f, k,ab +., s "u., r wr Yt*.f r.„,. r {nr„3 ��r, r0y' Y�'< : , �, , ,, '. Evaluation: Modest example of the Ranch style. In :.1 T�¢ scale and character with the neighborhood. f Ir c _ t � , J '^m Pmr p .a wirL riq A ' '4.f k` -'4"2x'4tw b ,y t4Sr"-4 a ro y W •', ' V i. ♦.i'' I $ a � 'IV' v +` w�r "'Wh'F E� k si rr. .ca�„ 'n a ``r ' ., 4), , �7 !*"i ti ' ' ''''''2a.. .....,,,,_., , . . . ...,+.}- ,... ...-...„ --....,..... .. :- j _ ''' ,..t. 41 NI r e . Address: 503 NE 2nd Avenue " > p� M r '� x -, ", � `` 1 -�` ,taw s : , f Ple It Year Built: 1947 1.,� y -- ,4� r e " a4k� , ;F ei l' PA ,:.% Architectural Style: Streamline Moderne � ;;�{ ,�aP -� *,; ; ' �' r'4 . �S , t 4.r.�vu.,rkv,:�t� 1 P r t} + Evaluation: Fine example of Streamline Moderne. . i r u .1 t , � i ' fry ..:. .�� _ , , ... + .. Ord :inancer 15'. 0` 9 Del Ida Park Historic: District Frame Vernacular Masonry Vernacular .a — ��. _ kr is r,zr JJ�' �Y {l F ,9 a • 'ti -�-+ u "�' sF . f�.71'n { s . , aF J i F t 4.. $ byJ r;"— ._ -' i �}f `,, 1 .Y'.}r. �' .iti t ^ ! 4i , , .,. , ih tw 1 r vsry : I, „..,,? , , ,',-.-..—-,::_.: ir:';:.. .0" ' .,,f..,..,i1A'r, i ' '. *,,IA {` y* . � or lL. 4c : r, t ry f`, ,"1 -. , t - ,s , > 5 f� ,r. I .P` v1. � ' �,._,.:.-'-- "xa./(;— 1 : j , t k" • r~ - 4 4s tt:; • • .� +. { r 2 �ri ' fTf'a �` .n d` j'• {✓c•A I • , —— '"1 '. L i� r C--. 3',�' 1, P. .^ f { �' p 71�y +�-z•�,. r J { .f r s 7� t+-s '•"'v !f i � 101\ s � gr' ' V s..w..+ 1 ---•.. �' ' >tira rh e 1', / 'itt ` w .r„ - 't' 93�s^Ka+'J3?3'V"t, ..,•.' ,,.. f ds12,S;y, r,,r.. ,"'°„•t. ,, *. ...-::.'�a .4'''p„d-,}zW st i i ..,.... ,K ... .. ❖ Vernacular: native to an area or resident culture; embraces diversity of folk and mass-produced building ••• Share many Frame Vernacular characteristics. forms transmitted by memory or pattern books. ❖ Simple, largely unornamented; constructed from Designed & constructed by lay builders who utilized readily available materials. traditional building techniques. ❖ Characteristics include a symmetrical plan shape, •v Decorative features from historical styles, i.e. vernacular concrete block, hollow clay tile, brick building buildings in Delray Beach may have recognizable features ' materials with stucco exterior. from Mediterranean Revival or Mission styles. ❖ Gable, hip, cross-gabled, or flat roof with barrel, + Significant in defining unique characteristics of a place. flat concrete, or shingle tiles used. ❖ Symmetrical or "L" shape plan; made of locally-available + May be a one or two-story structure with materials, contains wood siding; gable or hip roof; one or ornamentation consisting of cast concrete, scored two stories; sash windows; shed porch across front. stucco, concrete lintels and sills. ❖ Ornamentation consist of rafter tails, cornerboards, + Freestanding garage may reflect details of main vents in gable ends, and shutters. residence ❖ Freestanding garages reflect details existing on main residence 1 Of. dinarite 15 0' . Del -Ida Park Historic District Streamline Moderne Ranch �, _ t� tom`. �w -7., -. _ i `;'4 ��ts �r�;, :�; ��, l ,fit l.:r ,� .7., i.. ��,; •� �1�p � y ? r' 4 ` ? r 4 .a' ' !`. •P",(a `" 'ry �!:.'11 ' .. ,. ' : + ,,�r ,..ei: 7.,,'�,� .;., 3.;v,`sV '.i &�.ji,� yrr��,t . ' ,.,y 5 , '4 _ ,L,j) i "' ` .i. l .i \ ,fit '�. .,' n r Pw 4Ti',F`I"� :`� �' 'i ` '♦f c ,...� �, 1 ,�:: b. �r� ^.,+i" �. ��h..•:'Zy. ..�' 'p 'fib, �9y.�,�� ,,_�� F` v�' ^t' _ t. >+r¢yw 1 r 11„.r ) 4fk tr w al,± Wa 7r ti S..tS i ..:: :;. R.._ � .:.` .+,.:�♦.r1 .. 1 ^ 1"� � r:tY � � �.:' el'.A :a L, �t i I t YY'+A'i�•'�.3. '" Jr' e,,. +5►!r a;•• ., :i Rh ' , : .. k�a � ' �'✓'6 { �4 � ! �y 'e",t { y � rA Y ,11 ,. 11 �s t $'',f tf) I i '..,,. f. , .4:.. �.�5 Ii. .t a't :. r r, t t � � *,d �� ,}� S "1• � d+`� f$ �'1.�x' r�*r t � 3N` y..• � ." ' ^i•.w.57}^"k,�� r t �. 'il !!ICII 1rt' '.. t YM1, A • lj`,'{ !� _{ r�;,�a�K 4'� rr.,�3.. -is a'y' •J ,e^' �� {L� �'� :'>r S [[I .. ; �.y.__ '.rry 'atr'4r,�. , 1 ,fit 7W 4 F' ?r h t fl 1-27: i �y,.•i,e r ' , .Y. :, �r! !;%„:5;A?h., ;` N 4" ,�� ,'' 1 • 1 , r F "/ Nh: ,"i a`i,r ,��1 a,-vv,k h..14,K ,v, AM Yrvu7 r ae ' `Fdcif+fN^s-a ' ' .. .r '•' . � a'`'.. ' "1-!. 1 y'Y"xi ',: t >.. ,', . �,t 9'' �V, `r",i c. .,:. z. .o..., , ^t •..,;. _.. • `wt 2 '" 1 .,�... ... .....,. . .. .i „ S Y4 il —. c. t ' I 4 �1 . ..n:, 1 Y v,, of�.y V 5 —ilit T .. yam - -. .., :. .. r..... °.° Later phase of Art Deco (1930s- 1940s) generally called Style originated in California in mid-1930s; Art/ Streamline Moderne. continued in popularity through 1970s. °;° Reflected the interest in popular streamlined designs for ' + Attributed to availability of automobile; attached ships, airplanes, and automobiles. garage, frequent on front elevation. °:° Machine-inspired imagery gave the style a sleek and " Built on larger parcels allowing one-story modern appearance. residence to sprawl & consist of long, shallow, one- °<° Massing reflects abstract, simplified forms with rounded story houses with low gable or hip roofs & deep corners devoid of much applied decoration. eaves; front façade may project at one or both ends. °°° Plan orientation usually to a rear patio accessed °:° Horizontal compositions, bands of windows, racing ° stripes, and flat roofs are featured, as well as new materials through sliding glass doors to integrate interior & such as vitrolite, glass block, chrome, stainless steel, exterior through large expanses of glass, i.e. picture terrazzo, and neon. ` windows or window walls. °:° Features are "eyebrow" ledges over the windows, front °°°° Clapboard or stucco are common exterior porches, nautical motifs (porthole windows) & bas-relief treatments; brick exterior occasionally used. Sparse panels depicting tropical scenes. decoration; rarely more than shutters and open-work metal posts. O r d i n a' n c e, 15 0 9' Del - id .a a :rk H lstor -ic Di` strict Contemporary t ❖ Inspired by International Style; simple, clean lines, flat roofs, , w rectangular forms, & lack of detail. • ,., w t ° sHrr f. •°• Important feature is break with traditional, historical models; rely on �.. 1, vA 1 massing, new materials and methods of construction and sculptural ,--� ,� forms for architectural expression. Y' r t� 1� � t a ,, ❖ Many fine examples of Contemporary Style houses built during post R• I .. ',� ¢, � � 4-, „ 5� 1 l �;{s$ WWII building construction surge in Del-Ida Park (1950-1970). " 1' `" `c.. "' 3 �'. a- ❖ Irregular plan, flat roof, cantilevered, broad, overhanging roof eaves, .2 t..''` "y'' i Rf'' "... Pam'. — f'a rAa1' 4 , ' t, d ,, „-�� , f �. ,...,� - .,: ,, _.:,} � bands of windows, and use of metal characterize Delray Beach 240 Dixie Boulevard contemporary residences. ,: � ;:` < ' bands of , � y , � � �1 ��., . Stucco and/or multiple materials usedon exterior; 4'' '�. f ' #" ' 's" .. windows for a horizontal emphasis; glass jalousie windows; attached carport. „ . ir 1 c9 "1'4 o• Not 50 years old when the Del-Ida Park Historic District was '' h'4, r designated, not meeting the age threshold to be considered as i t ' L ''t{ ' '`I ' hl contributing structures. Iy (` r l 1 gip'• t, ._rs„;. iF �. 1.44.,E 4` 1' � ` 4 1 i ' * i '` . ❖ Strongrecommendation that these houses be recognized and WI: x i.174t-ii , �,, ,, , 11 w i <�} y ',f E 1,�, -:"fir;1 , , ;1,Y" ,fa officially listed as contributing buildings in the Designation Report, for ,� their historical and architectural significance as representative .u�.,... _ _ F � am.s, a, 215 NE 5th Street examples of Post-War Era design. Ordinance 15 09 • :e1 - Ida Park istoric Dist -riot Minimal Traditional ' ❖ Several fine examples found in Del-Ida Park. •e• Built originally during the Depression era; show simple, sober a, l : designs with some modest detailing of more traditional styles. � { {.ate Y' ! A-. 4 +i II. k, ., , ; F ;-; + Illustrates transition in residential design from period just before it r ' �'' If ( World War II through the 1950s. • 1_' 4 h , fY �t d N,w � W ''''':pyK AMA, ' ,mS` !, 14 '`'`' i4 4 i. _` 3 , . `°':�" As housing became affordable and new building technologies W 1��w)R'�SCS 4h +f��K�„`.r ry d � FaYoi�.r A„�'"�y� � T#;rv* , , g , . ', 4 � 1 allowed for prefabrication and mass production, simpler homes. 105 NE 6th Street ❖ Inspired by Tudor cottages popular during 1920s - 1930s; ,� �: rrewi reflected in dominant front gable on main elevation. _. il,'..,.tr �lit� ••• Symmetrical plan, clapboard or stucco exterior partially faced ii-k. ut ' �t 1:,. r - � , .\k*' ''''S e 4" with stone/rock/brick at times; one-story, single or concrete tile roof material shutters and cornerboards. r,', �' j,M ; , t ,t ,,,4F . ,1 ••• Typical details include low to medium pitch gable roofs facing M1j ,�, ,�„ � �, ;��.� t��x� front, modest overhangs, prominent chimneys, decorative wood . -TM1'- �, ' I1 ,,�t,z4.''* I. ' , details or vents on gable ends, •inset porches supported on j Jf�M YI-It. �]'S.„-, ,s +.a ixt j,, ",` r £1{' r ` ' a `:;A" ` decorative wood supports and sparsely used Colonial or other 204 NE Sth Terrace traditional applied decoration, such as door and window surrounds. Ordinance 1 ., a.9 _ _ Del Ida ark � s ®.r:ic Di: st •r ,.,.ic , , o Architectural Styles found from 1944 — 1970 Contemporary Ranch Frame Vernacular f ;f, r t R • rs d4"i • �1 , i � ,0 ! • .,lr� p { i r e.r btR YF p A' I "+ _ a yvri.`, /t'. �' a n r' _ F r ,� tt r � Fi�t't it _ v f.,. �p�, +r.ytr h� t5`t`, L�;,.�� t ��•:r i, t �+ !."'; '{ 3 S ,{ `� ,:ryr> `a � T r - • ^fA 1 .i ,. rn 7 F t r::..'h r k � 1 y, ,}�j' r 7� 'e 7' '/ t . Y.tYr',''.'" ,� 4y 1ah.�'. 'e't♦♦ a: `w. ..,�. 'nh.,.' W�,','{ . .., ..L tr'f't!x4, fd :•t ti',Qr,t..a0.,nt „ , a �C' ,r w. t .:" ".. :M q i.a + rt. „ _ '� ,rite 7� .x , - •.., ,,A,.�r. ..te 5-k^Y!Y�9 �d:C., :.ittF:t:e . .., rfr . 1... uit,k G'4 RtS b ';('. 10 NE 5th Street 216 Dixie Boulevard 524 NE 3rd Avenue Masonry Vernacular Minimal Traditional Streamline Moderne 'C.:'+tF•T'A:. �.} , , ti s r *5C�,3•'µat.. . Z. ..�r liy i'. i {i : i v1� ato-Ti `'f ? yn.r � r ,w " i w Za. J1 f, p t a rfy ; °iY ' br 1 . S y{7 t E P : E x? > . �•/F1° i�• t, ,, ., « t v.... N t • • • • �' { ,`! T P ` r fi r ,I� Yt4 Y Y � tr r0 t�b \‘ "K r °Q , � r �d+ i-, . . � t H .". ., v, IA' 1yh i.` " e.fF va YF .j r{ f r r r Y 'j� y✓✓ 1,. h ")' c F . s 'f4g I� �,. 4). A art.' 4. V ; t: ' S , v "Y� tl k i F �" c .4 ; ! h"V : i(,� . , "1K i�& r ra k i. t„ �t t 1 ,'s .i!kwti I �{�j v s - . ` .' ~^a. .r, tt� a._.t .. tiu , ,, ,. t :.,, „,. ie8 :. t.,ag iia: • r ,•4 th..r.ati Jm "=� »vr.�+.w.1.. ".u�-. «�. ,b.w,.:?a�.w..L'FIf I (f I _ n*aa' N x .u .,. , t A .,c � 4 4 • 1C. � Y t" ', /Z k —•"'., t M/^.sgr'S•rm.t,k':'uss.. 40f.•"..:�.s Y ,i t,�.l; 10-�°�'. r i..r;. 225 NE 5th Court 204 NE 5th Terrace 503 NE 2"d Avenue f ' ' r d` .In a n c e 15 - 09 Del - Ida Park Historic District Resurvey Recommendation •:• Period of Significance 1944 — 1970 o The post World War II era was a significant period in the historic and architectural development of Delray Beach. ..a marked population increase, as many GIs stationed in the area relocated with their families after the war... resulting in a period of growth in business, tourism, and job opportunities creating an increased housing demand... o ...success of the Del-Ida Park was as typical of the Florida Real Estate Boom as its rapid collapse following the Stock Market Crash of 1929 and subsequent years of the Great Depression. Construction continued, but at a much slower pace during the 1930s and 1940s. It was not until the end of World War II that Del-Ida Park experienced a new surge in construction...Delray Beach saw a marked increase in population,...Del-Ida Park was an attractive middle-class suburban community, centrally located and reasonably priced. Many new houses went up at this time, modest in scale, but representative of the latest trends in architectural design, materials and technology. Ordinance 15 - 09 • Del Ida Park; Historic, District- CRITERIA CONSIDERATION G: PROPERTIES THAT HAVE ACHIEVED SIGNIFICANCE WITHIN THE LAST FIFTY YEARS ❖ POST-WORLD WAR II PROPERTIES: Properties associated with the post-World War II era must be identified and evaluated to determine which ones in an area could be judged exceptionally important. For example, a post-war suburban subdivision may be the best reflection of contemporary siting and design tenets in a metropolitan area...the nomination preparer must justify the exceptional importance of the property relative to similar properties in the community, State, or nation. ❖ HISTORIC DISTRICTS: ...eligible if they are an integral part of a district which qualifies for National Register Iisting...documenting that the property dates from within the district's defined Period of Significance and that it is associated with one or more of the district's defined Areas of Significance. Properties less than fifty years old may be an integral part of a district when there is sufficient perspective to consider the properties as historic...by demonstrating that: 1) the district's Period of Significance is justified as a discrete period with a defined beginning and end, 2) the character of the district's historic resources is clearly defined and assessed, 3) specific resources in the district are demonstrated to date from that discrete era, and 4) the majority of district properties are over fifty years old. In these instances, it is not necessary to prove exceptional importance of either the district itself or the less-than-fifty-year- old properties. Exceptional importance still must be demonstrated for district where the majority of properties or the major Period of Significance is less than fifty years old, and for less-than fifty-year-old properties which are nominated individually. Ordinance :.15 9 Del Ida pa �iis :or isltri •�• Criteria Considerations: such properties will qualify if they are integral parts of districts that do meet the criteria or if they fall within the following categories: a. a religious property deriving primary significance from architectural or artistic distinction or historical importance; or b. a building or structure removed from its original location but which is significant primarily for architectural value, or which is the surviving structure most importantly associated with a historic person or event; or c. a birthplace or grave of a historical figure of outstanding importance if there is no appropriate site or building directly associated with his or her productive life; or d. a cemetery which derives its primary significance from graves of persons of transcendent importance, from age, from distinctive design features, from association with historic events; or e. a reconstructed building when accurately executed in a suitable environment and presented in a dignified manner as part of a restoration master plan, and when no other building or structure with the same association has survived; or f. a property primarily commemorative in intent if design, age, tradition, or symbolic value has invested it with its own exceptional significance; or, g. a property achieving significance within the past 50 years if it is of exceptional importance. Ordinance 15 - 09 i District s � rlct Del - Ida Park Historic st � rc: + Historic Context - Local, State, and National o A local historic context represents an aspect of the history of a town, city, county, cultural area, or region, or any portions thereof. o Properties are evaluated in a State context when they represent an aspect of the history of the State as a whole. o Properties are evaluated in a national context when they represent an aspect of the history of the United States and its territories as a whole. These national historic contexts may have associated properties that are locally or statewide significant representations, as well as those of national significance. •a• Criteria Considerations: Certain kinds of properties are not usually considered for listing in the National Register: religious properties, moved properties, birthplaces and graves, cemeteries, reconstructed properties, commemorative properties, and properties achieving significance within the past fifty years. These properties can be eligible for listing, however, if they meet special requirements, called Criteria Considerations, in addition to meeting the regular requirements (that is, being eligible under one or more of the four Criteria and possessing integrity). Ordinance 15 - 09 Del - Ida Park. Historic District - w Del-Ida Park meets the National Register Criteria as follows: o Criterion A- An event, a series of events or activities, or patterns of an area's development: due to associations with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad pattern of the City's history as one of the first planned residential developments in Delray Beach with representation of the 1920s Land Boom and 1930s settlement following the Land Boom and inclusion of post World War II growth from the 1940s through the 1960s. o Criterion B- Association with the life of an important person: due to associations with people significant to the City, as one of the early investors was Frederick Henry Link, a Craftsman at Mizner Industries, and whose daughter, Catherine Link Strong was the City's first female Mayor and lived in the neighborhood. o Criterion C- A building form, architectural style, engineering technique, or artistic values, based on a stage of physical development, or the use of a material or method of construction that shaped the historic identity of an area: embodies one or more distinctive architectural styles or types such as the Mission, Mediterranean Revival, Minimal Traditional, Contemporary, Masonry and Frame Vernacular, Ranch, and Streamline Moderne, with the Mission and Mediterranean Revival style containing influences directly from renown Architect Addison Mizner, as Frederick Henry Link was a craftsman at Mizner Industries. O r�d i- n a n c e. 15 0 9r. [del Id a Park. Historic District National Register of Historic Places — SIGNIFICANCE: o ...may include features that lack individual distinction and individually distinctive features that serve as focal points. o ...considered eligible if all of the components lack individual distinction, provided that the grouping achieves significance as a whole within its historic context...the majority of the components that add to the district's historic character, even if they are individually undistinguished, must possess integrity, as must the district as a whole. o The number of noncontributing properties a district can contain yet still convey its sense of time and place and historical development depends on how these properties affect the district's integrity. National Register of Historic Places — EVALUATING CONTEXT & SIGNIFICANCE: o ...historical patterns that can be identified through consideration of the history of the property and the history of the surrounding area. In accordance with the National Register Criteria, the historic context may relate to one of the following: ®An event, a series of events or activities, or patterns of an area's development (Criterion A); ®Association with the life of an important person (Criterion B); ®A building form, architectural style, engineering technique, or artistic values, based on a stage of physical development, or the use of a material or method of construction that shaped the historic identity of an area (Criterion C); or •A research topic (Criterion D). Ordihan e 15 09 Del Ida Park Historic District 2009 Resurvey Recommendations o Expand Period of Significance to 1970 o Reclassify 48 Properties from non-contributing to contributing o Apply for listing of the district on the National Register of Historic Places • Period of Significance o Guidebook: When identifying the historic context and significance of a historic district, the stages of growth in the neighborhood are labeled as "Periods of Significance." The character of a house constructed in the early twentieth century is vastly different than the character of one constructed during the 1930s and 1940s. While both houses illustrate an evolution, and are all more than 50 years old, each belongs to a specific time frame in history and each period of significance has its singular importance and special characteristics. Properties in historic districts must relate to the periods of significance that are documented in the historic district nomination. o National Register of Historic Places — SIGNIFICANCE: A district must be significant, as well as being an identifiable entity...must be important for historical, architectural, archeological, engineering, or cultural values. Therefore, districts that are significant will usually meet the last portion of Criterion C plus Criterion A, Criterion B, other portions of Criterion C, or Criterion D. Ordinance 15 - 09 Del Ida Park istoric District- ❖ Del-Ida Park Historic District designated March 22, 1988 by Ordinance 9-88. o Period of Significance: 1923 — 1943. o Architectural Styles: Mission, Mediterranean Revival, Minimal Traditional, Frame Vernacular, Masonry Vernacular o 47 Contributing Structures o 103 Non-Contributing Structures Changes in Del-Ida Park Historic District since 1988: o Demolition • Contributing — 1 (107 NE 6th Street) • Non-Contributing — 2 (527 N Swinton Ave, 251 Dixie Blvd) o New Construction/Development and/or Change of Use • Single Family Residences — New Construction • Non-Residential Development — New Construction • Adaptive Reuse - Conversion from Residential to Office o Ad Valorem Tax Exemption • 105 NE 7th Street (2002) Savings through 2008: $5,069.97 • 515 North Swinton Avenue (2008) Savings not yet determined. 2009 Taxable Value — $562,842/Historic Exemption Value: $103,393 City and County Rates Applied to: $459,449 0--i-difia -n--E-e• 'I-.5. -.--10.9 :De1-... I a Park F ‘,, ,,..' ..-o :1;. c D- I s r c t_. ______•: -T-I -1-47-1—.---1_,--11.--11-1 1923 Sanborn Map .I..:1;,7p::-7;".,i"v i•I -'p'r.: ",._-1.1.,I r•c.-'.::_;'-_n 3.E,,,,1-ri-1T-f,-. -ti-)•-V—:';4f, -144.,•:,l%,.'','j \.•S\., i!, L'<- t,....1 l j .L-..?'7,- .7.-_-i - 1 i 1 — I - I t_ _I' ir,-,i ,_, 14...kJ)._ ,, _, 4,. . ‹,.;\ •.,,-/ 5. ... — 1 t"------, , ,,, 7.., , ii..—_—_,i '1 i ''''_ • ' I ,f_ :. _' . 'Y r* '.-J:\..) ,.'' '' '' ‘'S 1 1 , „,..ID__,_ i_4... li___,. ,...e.„‘„,;,:c.„. /,--).../.....__I — i I l_l_l_1--- :' /;/\..-.),\\?,)/K i -----1 I [ -..7...- - 1 -417''' •.1:.C:"".1'....:./..:' ;::::::::::'' ' </, C:7 ...!-' . \ <1°.1' 0,..,;?---' '.., .il i 1,11 ' 7 0: t',./ ..., , 4, ' '(> ,• I -1 . I 1-r =---k If'-\ /V 5''', V-_.•-'• ' ,7• / i 1,-A r ,. ..„,,,,,,.._..: i.,.,,„ , ., .,...,.,, ,, , .„ .,,,,, ,.--- , .r.il ii • ,p`',1> .\ I p------- isti 1 - LYI i".;_)! *vd i [r;,r),.i... ..;` '\/?' .2. \c\>, . ( [1 I 'ry ' ,,i e;\ • r, I 1 ' ',/ f . ,11 _1:tr---, ,. .:,.. ,h.> ., \ . . n - / k•,6 ... t -' , 10 1 - .1:'c- .. 'N'i"' . . A, ri...„z.1 .,.I "II • r'... 0\ -r 4 z .\\,,,, ,.1 •'\ . ''-';/'-i---1 t I I If 2..,,/ <2. • ,' • 04\ —7 :,/ : g./ ' f t. '' I, >'• ••,,\*.:.\\,Ns\'` \/) (i\e' \\y''',(/_.j 17.7:1, 1 , Cii:§0 ; I, a 6,; id, ..,.;......,,..\l',.i'' \\ •.:cz., . ,?..,;‘,.p., , ,;‹,..,,.,. ,,.„z,. .- .., _o_p_,:, II I,../.:is\ 7'\,,-"\,>,/., .-'-'.----r-,*-------;'Li-.; - .'• is---1.____i 1-1.,: .11."..1-:-.,..,....'E''.. ..: , .1705,,,, ' ,c' ''6 • s ,, .„.„, _ La.,,,‘ __i,4,..„: c, _____ri__....,,i.., , --- iy,,,tf;.?.,\\.. , \\5 <, i• . .\•,,T' 'Yd'.'?!,,,,rj- :-....7:-- -.1-1; i----I 1'41 1,0 ,i1:-7.:1 I C.:3 Z Fir14?J'I 1 T'Ill N .. .)'Y?. . . _ , -, _1,-.,.'.._, ,; alry• ,-,:,..., 1 .. . .6'Fin,rut •....,"-„,, . ..,- i.., ---- ,1 •. 1-"cxNsj•—'\•'\' " ..:-------1:-;;;`,...;----..::•----.If/ . 1 2 . .1.,...,,,,_...1:...:..:Lz_.L.,$..7.;,7-..1--- ..,.. . .1--rr------:1) ,. ',.0/...- '...\''):344.\\.;),\ -;44: — .1' - v 4s.• 's. s.-: , ---I----- 7"-121____: 92:1_ A •• -- I ' A\ • 1, i 1 ' 'PI.1 ?!-L6-1 7. , -, -, --. • - -- ., fr.-.:0,,,, i 1, , 1.--4 I _____I r.t._3, .,,3 '.1,•.3_--7-" ,F., e \ I Q\\-/ <V, ,..-. , .. `- ' •/ )i;1.,,/, k 71 i I : 't- -I u'i°TiF . wz d l_ci-ea i r• r. 11....,. k_. . ,_ \ ., .7,„,-, ....... _ . . 1.---1,/ ,,-T-_,-,-'TN [-.4) --til.:1-, ., i....„1-.-..-j--1 /-_,---ill, i , - 1.7,-,-i 7.-7...-i f.7-z-7):- -1 -2' -'".., -...\.;.' / _iii__I-___17_3—!,,ii,I,! II:. 7C)".,,-K': x', '',4)' ''fs \-\\4.,.....7.\ ,`,,ti''', -.1':.;:t6if,Q,:ril.".;,'C'' u,, /1 .6-...r,,.1i,,ii.;1.--13. i:fi li,f.ji:h°3::';',: 1 ' I 1 ..,• 1 P J., 1.1.7-1_, I i., j,It „, 41 , [:.) ---4. ' !;.'s\V A'f.,' \, :i " i' I • /^ •6 , \t 4) . ' —7- . -----.---'' .-0---, I P - --' r-- 11 -11. i --)li 1 -1''"1'''''' "1- ' Z.6,_-F.—. . ---,,, I E i--___112 -.• i —II- :E, ,„ '''''°$ \\\.,;!1-..—_, 1_ --","" / "I' 1.(/,--- ._‘'_.•, et,,''':''',6:•'''Z' iti! (rcl lc,ri rr• . ‘7,. I ireri .i _.14'.'"I ' i.,'''I.- 163 .VI-r-a i 1-gl °,, '4' ' i''..•\`I\ / -'til ..1 1.,,,,//t2r-}.__,, .-3=iii,D.''. A'"‘",/ 1._,:_.._____,%,_k_..' i . '' 1-\1>) , 1.1 1..' ,...- '7" .11- . ,r• Ali-..?:. ' L.. _ •,„-1,...4.47.i.--tun' ' 11,; \ II[ ' 1 ill-ii-Ai'R .LPZ.bilii tr:": 1)fit ff-71 -- . fi gi 4:ii, -- - ) ''' ..;:'• , In i 1 lif. . .-'1 ' j.''':;:l.•%,' ...;;(\ i 1 (% .) " >'"2/ 1'.- / _S 'M-— i,• .,,, ''''. i41-3-Hi:117 if '-‘1 f i 1 _- i .4 , ?'.:7, .p.....:e.-.. "F ,:::......_•,.,„- ,$:'.1„;.:11_.),._:.' '.47.,11,p7:,.1i_-2t,1 1 f( .--ili___., _Ti' "-'-'•' i : i •..--• t..s .. is. 0— , _J.3777, ,./\,.<:' ......,y„..(\<•••0_ ____:-#.----*--I id- , 6 ' \ - 1963 Sanborn Map \.,-1,\, ,. <-, - ./\, . Q --1 ..,-'aD P 2.1.__1__i,..1,- --ti' :, i .7 I *,, D.,., ' A 'F, ___II.I.Y__—_:...r.i." -' ''.a 1.------ • •,... OP' ' ' \,c,., 0•': *._._ -ii_ -1— 1949 Sanborn Map 1-17/'----16-z-i----• ':,i--i-="-- -1 2 - "7 7'0 1 .' 0 r d i 'n a n c e 1: 5 0 9 . Del - Ida Park Historic District 1949 Sanborn Map ' LLa�•�, Pr:1P. �. End of World War II -experienced a new surge in t�; r �a ��--•- - ---- V EtI rmered and relocated with their families...was an , , .---,,.. ST,,. ..-�- is .{ /✓'/ , \_ S , 0 __ �`\ v \ I''' 1 ' attractive middle-class community, centrally located °}-j`'—,6"--.'\'' _ \\ V\ n° --- Y P.1 and reasonably priced. Many new houses went up at '''' d ,V �� this time, modest in scale, but representative of the a n.e5•n sr. n.C /) " > �' • �O latest trends in architectural design, materials and JP \ ��' .�� _ � � — technology. \ \e'.4,0, z;,,,c1-}a.,_____ 0 14 It I i I , — f \'�. s \d :- -I 1 dl I, " +Consists of primarily single family, one story 's. \ �w'' "4.7'7' ='_- ' zP7 residences,...some two story houses and a few duplex ,/ `. '.' a El '('3 r''0 \ . --I-�-- _ d, structures built during the 1950s and 1960s...some )y _ � , converted to light office use, residential character n s•s F .... -n._--_ :: remains fairly intact. Few historic houses have been r ;�in. __ -- demolished. Li ,!: I1 n _•i 'F__—F!!1,!."61 N mi am© ~' ' 'v �,� I ❖ Relatively few unsympathetic alterations or additions...additions have been made with respect and sensitivity to the original houses, compatible in design yet clearly distinguishable from the historic portion. IL - -_ Ordinance 1 09 Del - Ida Park: Historic Distric 1926 Sanborn Map i I, I I,1 t c I I 1_l_i_J iu u.__.J_��J�« I I t 1�IJ �i ` `",, `"�P, 2- _ ❖ One of the first planned residential developments in Delray Beach. On September 18, 1923, Del-Ida Park was a - ��- "• 1�" «r` r' officiallyplatted and recorded..was an almost instant 2 ,_-'31 ( �,� .._ I success. On October 19, 1923, the Delray News reported \ \�. -- that "Wonderful progress is being made in Del-Ida Park, t 0 I ._�_. _�` , p* 7.", - - - our new suburb. Nice hard surfaced streets are being run 1 --1 -J- �� . =: r.,, through the property and it is beginning to look like a real =-2 r/.. ...,.. ..l`ro� N\a —I ., 10 ,g y 1, _' townr�yy ' ' ___l_ A � j., _.-;�.__...- •o One of the first investors was Frederick Henry Link, ' ftit 1 f 'T '1:777.7-7-7--7 formerlyacraftsmanustries iS ' sevl lots...became th� e Beach, purchased g 2-./,' ._, %. \ '__�_1.-_-1\7 ' 0 , contractor for the development, most of the early F�J �_._.__.J11___ l -- -1. . houses in Del-Ida Park were built by him...constructed _ !lb_ l I- j IT - _ „1'1 own home at 524 N.E. 2nd Avenue. _..._ _____„,o________.,__ �`�i--a1�� 1--rV--1=r--]1- ---i -«1- -7 _--eta�-�--_r ❖ The great almost overnight success was as typical of the Florida Real Estate Boom as its rapid collapse following the Stock Market Crash of 1929 and Great Depression. Construction continued, but at a much slower pace during the 1930s and 1940s. , Ordi. nance 15 ® 9 Del Id ;a Park Historic District � a se BOULEVARDI I 1 J ' BUSH 11IIIIIIII ) IIIIIII1IGEORGEKey.tpq !3 ai 14 i ` ' i' ,721 14 102 110114 i t, ;r-� .7� Toe P;` t,: ', �, > ,z: I 701 5 17 105 ',109i11 Q � �,� 'r,� frfi " Q , RO Residential Office Zone District N.E. 7TH ST. ryp`y "'WI �P�O ,r° '� is s �� fy � r �p`I,11�i� 60b' },tol4l02h10 • s1 oJ`' g g % °;tl7�o� 703' !' RL Multi-Family Residential {�11 V203 ?4Tp Y C41792? 70111 (Low Density) N.E. 6TH ST. r 531 10 110 1s • p� ; , � tY"9 I R-1-AA Single-Family Residential 5�7r4 G�• } �°h "i r ?Alt r�; 1 Z 521st, 0 6' TM s,k -1P`1f,,P,,u` ,r Or�� ' —> ?� r�6* ;. ° 0.° ,ii 1� 6r�0� Contributing — 1988 Designation � � 204 °, ��. y; s ° I, I N.E. DTH R'RFc. �' bpi w � 543 ? 9 ro , 524; N 204 N �Y 't 23s Contributing — 2009 Resurvey I 524 6, ,14 7 N 2(1,1% 200 1 ' N . •.4yg1+ h r8 R,1*,} ; N N ,11.1 520IIa , P q{ I` t1 kiffi4 M ,e..ca!` 525 +� #„'c�,a' M N.E 5TH cT. rYx� r' ° ,' , Non-Contributing ?c�-�' f','iO4 210 218' N ;t" u K*i1 , 101 C: 503 213' 225 rh.,i'h 1` o Vacant Z 2 9' ��.•2'cRI �5r?,, !'o f N.E. 5TH ST. 4M7 Pam; Z 415 !a 'i , aa'' ovmwNcoa .418 ,� Nr `n 4.23 ' �d 2 o r c-N Oo oo — 412 W w41°tasy. `N ?r` ..t` 411r I+V' (n 407 3: >imI z 'r405 . ``, 15 (01=103 >>� z 401- 217 / , N.E. 4TH -- ---- --- - -- - -- - - - - - llum__. -- Ordinance 15 09: Del Ida Park Historic District ••• Overview ❖ 1988 Designation Information • 2009 Resurvey Recommendations o Period of Significance o Reclassified Properties o Listing on the National Register of Historic Places ❖ Effects of Historic Designation and Historic Preservation Board Review o Contributing vs. Non-Contributing ••• Benefits of Historic Preservation e o Community o Economics o Tax Exemption Program o Variances o CRA Programs ❖ Recommendation to City Commission t Ordinance 15` 0: 9 DeI Ida Park. Historic ® strict' " r-� i'r!'pe -'tt .c•' ..t i,4„,,r e t,�Ax+ ', ( Pry -• '' �'°' `',�t ;�'"*"t� , �,� �.t%. c•';� *w i• ° x•f k �.' f+r„ � e ,, 4;sy t ' r f � -(4r ' `'*, t t s,r�f+t + y1 t a"� h t 1 g FR j# •ar,.,a'r4 { t ,' ,�`t I � `:1�{,Y ' .e`�,ID'�•?Mi' M'-3 .R,l-i 111 r 3 , � :t wva� r { .�,�rii" a h � ,a 4 'fix,; im ht , p1itC,r%k r4, ,wa ' "; ( y�y ? r. I ,` r k l,- ,? !(t' , 1 f ?,: ' vh`s �o,.ill P 11"'%1�jW0l r� ,�}' t r ;fit 11 nt tf` �l Ill.iil i{I1dIY1` • K .�' '!�,•dl ', ` •rl LL ,` r '� y,�: 4 i` y}Ir' v,�gli ' t--p X "'-* ,' r w s' Ff- f S - vL:r.. f +.:' ,t ! aJ l A ,,, w., i �Vi 4 E, F," Mu 4 0 ! P Y. t a�cs �;M.A.,•yp�I. f F� t``y�� {,�C�{.k��. ��,.'�.h WWcw.v 'I'"". " /b J :'.ta�•. k+' .- Y "!•yl, I'i t l r by'.o-+i:.'7�A'::S-.u+�1...:T.•ius'tom✓ '�"n.o.+�F• 1 ,fPr ."}ql \4,., f51+ 1 . ' � � ��s�� ,,�, � ;, � fir` �,,+ + Ems•' ' J �i°'.� •i e "fi r Y V . ,ice'":�: k� * `4�^,{j�', .,......-„ , , ,,... , -L, * i v''3r'1�` , •h{r, ! * .w$ ..n i. - '7+_. -"':7wW a 2'�•' E r?.17'a 4,.• 4t t'`'St o-4'•' ,w y" P e S.a f �c ytl. y ?ten ti'• a i j,'7 K3 sr R d r f 1 .K �.r x rye, 4 \ t wJi ; e;3 ., i+n ,�jj` �' Ali l .+,. �C. . / x � ; s1S- ?1. �� F �'e� E •` $�.,s•}t i%•'�•4..�t �`�1.:;.i.• ! ? }Is �+• +n t'• a,e*i ° ,g. �t x o ??tl %, ..- , ■ a -T f' �s.•' t �kp� 'Iter �+,.. .n ,, 1. ., W +� �i ,".+rYr i, .t ■In .,...ter x it '•4,1, j � i{ a q,�x ar.><atz+ es- _ .. tqt�Ir'..':� ,A �) �, •'t 4;', .zR, -F r a SM rw, 1}y ` �46 'Z of _ .„ „�" t'f �„ „,,. ,t ., .',. ja,r �r �f t i�, F 77..•'i' f }y. t Alit"r.,, i t t",'E°t,, 1. , �1r � � 'a �� a e � f �'"S,x ", ^ ,* a ..Jr., -� :. ,y+k.rv. r ,!: .1, jT, . ,!.. . =; ; ';? -.ktt{'..n vt aEk�`': . p•V -x 6�a l� wu. ., ".pLtiM1 C'.P'i'• r ti�.i r yf4 #. ..a 4� d - ` M 4;v<, r '"""r • 1 :tl!'T'tt t ..�; t E K r , :,.. ;rV ': r y ,' ,/P a1y _ ,",n ^vf �y it a}p7: r1. L r `'`f l r n` s/l" • 'rye. / ."f� ... - 1`'s • • 'tl Y hX, Y W y '.rvw r it;w tt , r r, r`h. * c s ^ S_,-.w::' *..,. k.._r...r � a ; r,E..� �i �-'�` ��.. 4{ E^ I ;kl ` F +c+cc� ��k•'A x A w�.i' �w✓ ` FI 1 1 I y , 4 I ° ', �r { ,r `��1t1 H ' , 'i S l: '� AYir[[ ,l 1 ,` 1,� � y f � ;f k• ' • z. ;._. - _.....-- �s 1. ..+ 1i Y.".Xp ,r^" y� + t a''S" yf \4� x .r.ys y' �«: .:i':.t.�.''91.4`s�.t.. ; }:1, V4,e it ,,,,.„,............._ ,, . . ,.., ,„,::, 1: .„,,,,, ..r,,i_. y.` H yr, r �n fi4's. } y ti Y �Jdf { * ,F'a q y ^ 4 «F„� I yy��h P 1 1 r �.: �'`� ' j SjF �r 'I- ,44,4 ,,• ,,"t",t E t• 6 v-. yr ��++w �� '/fix n (�. � ;{E4•` tl� i � , i n. 4 'r ttg�S 1i� � k, 51 _ ��,�� yt�R'1• � {�,��p� #pL5 Yvf5`�li�fil��.. I` �`•` 3 t_`,,_4'rr LPf' 1T,•'.S " }l ._. �. .}... .r..; �r..... �' .v rprD •.x,a, h..�.:. HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT MEETING OF: September 16, 2009 ITEM: CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE 15-09 TO ACCEPT THE RESURVEY REPORT OF DEL-IDA PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT INCLUDING EXTENDING THE PERIOD OF SIGNIFICANCE AND RECLASSIFYING PROPERTIES FROM NON- CONTRIBUTING TO CONTRIBUTING. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is that of making a recommendation to the City Commission regarding Ordinance 15-09 which provides for the acceptance of the resurvey report of Del-Ida Park Historic District, including extension of the Period of Significance (POS), and reclassifying properties from Non- Contributing to Contributing, pursuant to Land Development Regulations (LDR) Section 4.5.1(N), Criteria for Change of Historic Classification and 4.5.1(0), Procedures for Change of Historic Classification. BACKGROUND The City hired RJ Heisenbottle Architects, Inc. to conduct a survey of the Del-Ida Park, Nassau Park, Old School Square, and West Settlers Historic Districts from July 2008 — January 2009. The objective was to survey all properties developed at least thirty-five years ago within each district and to identify those which contain both Contributing and Non-Contributing buildings and structures. A historical overview of each area was provided in the final report. The City Commission reviewed the recommendations of the final survey report for the Del-Ida Park Historic District at its workshop on February 10, 2009 and supported Staffs proposal to move forward and process the acceptance of the resurvey. The final survey report to be adopted is for the Del-Ida Park Historic District. The final survey report recommendations are as follows: • That the Period of Significance (POS) be expanded to 1970, which would reclassify 48 properties from Non-Contributing to Contributing. The current POS spans through to 1943. See Appendix A for those properties recommended for reclassification. • That listing on the National Register of Historic Places be sought for the entire district. Following are details regarding the Period of Significance and listing on the National Register of Historic Places: Period of Significance The resurvey report notes that the POS for the Del-Ida Park Historic District should be extended to 1970, based on the historical and architectural significance of the Post World War II period in the development of Del-Ida Park. The POS extension would reclassify 48 properties currently classified Non-Contributing to Contributing, which were constructed from 1944-1965. N Ordinance 15-09; Del-Ida Park Historic District Resurvey HPB Meeting September 16.2009; Page 2 of 8 National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) Listing on the NRHP would provide additional recognition for the district, but it should be noted that additional review criteria or restrictions would not be placed on properties located within the boundary. Additional explanation of NRHP listing is provided below. Ordinance 15-09 includes Attachment A, which is the Final Survey Report for the Del-Ida Park Historic District, and Attachment B, which notes each property and its date of construction, historic classification, and architectural style. At its April 15, 2009 meeting, the HPB reviewed and tabled the subject item until their June 17, 2009 meeting with the following direction given to Staff: 1. That an analysis be conducted regarding extending the POS to 1970, while only reclassifying those structures built through 1959 (later referred to as Alternative 2); and, 2. That an analysis be conducted to extend the POS only to 1959 (as opposed to 1970) (later referred to as Alternative 3). The requested analyses are provided in the "Analysis" section of this report where a comparison is provided between the survey recommendations (Alternative 1) and the two scenarios requested by the Board as noted above (Alternatives 2 and 3). Consideration of Ordinance 15-09 is now before the Board for review and recommendation to the City Commission. REVIEW LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Pursuant to LDR Section 2.2.6(A), a Historic Preservation Board for the City of Delray Beach is hereby created. The purpose of this Board is to foster and promote the recognition, protection, enhancement and use of historic resources in the City of Delray Beach and to have a lay body which shall have authority to act on matters pertaining to historic preservation. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.2.6(D)(1), Duties, Powers, and Responsibilities, the Historic Preservation Board shall develop, maintain, and update a survey of archaeological sites, properties, buildings, structures, and districts of special historic, aesthetic, architectural, cultural, or social value or interest. The Board will endeavor to improve, expand, and make more accurate the survey as additional documents, information, oral histories, and other such materials may become available, and it will periodically reevaluate the survey. The Board will work with the City Historical Society, the State Bureau of Historic Preservation, and other appropriate public and nonprofit organizations in maintaining this survey. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.2.6(D)(2), Duties, Powers, and Responsibilities, the Historic Preservation Board shall nominate properties for designation, and regulate such properties, structures, buildings, sites, districts, and the like so designated as historic sites and/or historic districts. STAFF COMMENT: The LDRs specify that as part of the HPB duties, the Board shall protect historic resources, and update surveys of historic resources. The resurvey of the Del-Ida Park Historic District complies with this requirement. Ordinance 15-09; Del-Ida Park Historic District Resurvey HPB Meeting September 16, 2009; Page 3 of 8 LDR Section 4.5.1(N), Criteria for Change of Historic Classification (1) A survey of all historic districts may be conducted by the City every five (5) years. The survey report may recommend changes to the historic designation and/or classification of properties located within or immediately adjacent to a designated historic district. (b) Criteria for Change of Historic Classification: If a City-initiated survey conducted within the last five (5) years reveals that a property within a historic district should be reclassified as either Contributing or non-Contributing, then the classification may be revised in accordance with LDR Section 4.5.1(0) and shall be determined as follows: 1. The survey recommends the inclusion of an additional "Period of Significance", which would reclassify properties from non-Contributing to Contributing, or,- 2. The survey recommends that a property or properties have been so significantly altered that the changes are irreversible and have compromised the structures historic integrity of the structure, which would reclassify the structure from Contributing to non-Contributing. STAFF COMMENT: The subject survey meets the criteria for change of historic classification as it was conducted within the last 5 years (complete January 2009), and the survey recommends that the Period of Significance be adopted which would reclassify 48 properties from Non-Contributing to Contributing, per the survey recommendation. Therefore, the reclassifications of the properties listed in Exhibit A are eligible for review. It is noted that additional resources are recommended for reclassification by Staff. These resources are further analyzed below. LDR Section 4.5.1(0), Procedures for Change of Historic Designation and/or Classification (2) Procedures for Change of Historic Classification: Applications to change the historic classification of a property or properties within a historic district shall be made to the Historic Preservation Board and may be initiated by written request of: (a) The Historic Preservation Board based upon the recommendations of a City-initiated survey completed within five (5) years prior to the application; or (b) The City Commission based upon the recommendations of a City-initiated survey completed within five (5) years prior to the application; or (3) The Planning and Zoning Director or his/her designee shall conduct a preliminary evaluation of the information provided on each application to determine if it generally conforms with criteria in LDR Section 4.5.1(N)(1). The Planning and Zoning Director or his/her designee shall then prepare a report which shall contain the following: (b) Change of Historic Classification: 1. Analysis of the properties to be reclassified; and 2. A staff recommendation as to whether or not the properties should be reclassified due to either: a. loss of historic integrity as a result of irreversible alterations to a Contributing property; or b. inclusion of an additional "Period of Significance"per the survey recommendations. STAFF COMMENT: Period of Significance & Reclassifications It has been determined that the subject request conforms with Section 4.5.1(N)(1), and the recommendations have been justified within the report with respect to the expansion of the POS to 1970. The information has been provided and reviewed by Staff and deemed to be complete. It should be noted that the date of construction for 251 Dixie Boulevard has been corrected via the Ordinance 15-09; Del-Ida Park Historic District Resurvey FIPB Meeting September 16,2009; Page 4 of 8 resurvey, as it was found to be a 1920s structure and not the 1950s structure it was thought to be when the district was designated in 1988. There were modifications to the Mission-style structure in the 1950s, and the survey now notes this property to be a Mission/Contemporary style. Page 8 of the Del- Ida Park final survey report recognizes and compliments the "transformation" of the structure from Mission to Contemporary style. In 2008, the HPB approved a demolition of this structure, and it was reviewed as a non-contributor. The demolition occurred earlier this year. The properties recommended for reclassification by RJ Heisenbottle Architects, Inc, were initially developed between 1944 and 1965 and are a part of the historic Del-Ida Park streetscape. While these structures may differ from the architectural styles of Del-Ida Park's initial development, they are compatible and illustrate the development building typologies of their time. It is important to note that the "Period of Significance" identifies the growth periods of a historic district and places the POS within its historical context. Therefore, extension of the POS to 1970 rather than 1965 when the last remaining eligible structure was built, includes the entire Post-WWII development impact on Del-Ida Park, and may recognize those appropriate improvements made to contributing structures during this timeframe. Staff's analysis of the resurvey recommendations are provided below. ANALYSIS RESURVEY RECOMMENDATIONS The following gives a comparison of the three potentially different alternatives the Board may choose to support based on the request from the April 15, 2009 meeting. However, Staff has provided an additional alternative for Board consideration. The POS, justification, and analysis for Alternative 4 are included below. Period of Significance Reclassified Properties Alternative 1 1970 48 Alternative 2 1970 38 Alternative 3 1959 38 Alternative 4 1965 48 Justification Alternative 1: The following contains excerpts from the resurvey report: "...It was not until the end of World War ll that Del-Ida Park experienced a new surge in construction. During the immediate post-war era, Delray Beach saw a marked increase in population,...Del-Ida Park was an attractive middle-class suburban community, centrally located and reasonably priced. Many new houses went up at this time, modest in scale, but representative of the latest trends in architectural design, materials and technology. There are many fine examples of Contemporary Style houses that were built during the post World War II building construction surge in Del-Ida Park...These houses were not 50 years old at the time when the Del-Ida Park Historic District was designated, therefore not meeting the age threshold to be considered as contributing structures. It is, however, RJHA's strong recommendation that these houses should be recognized and officially listed as contributing buildings in the Designation Report, for their historical and architectural significance as representative examples of Post-War Era design. The Del-Ida Park Historic District Designation Report, approved in 1988, places the Period of Significance cut-off date by which structures are to be evaluated at 1943. The cut-off date is • Ordinance 15-09; Del-Ida Park Historic District Resurvey HPB Meeting September 16,2009; Page 5 of 8 based in the generally accepted 50 year old threshold for considering eligibility of structures for listing as "contributing"within a designated historic district. In terms of historical and architectural development, it is difficult to justify this date under any other criteria than the 50 year threshold. The post World War Il era was a significant period in the historic and architectural development of Delray Beach. There was a marked population increase,...As a result, Delray Beach saw a period of growth...and therefore an increase in demand for housing...Del-Ida Park remained an attractive neighborhood, affordable and conveniently close to downtown...(report) discussed the architectural significance of the Contemporary Style housing built during this era. Many of the structures that RJHA has identified and recorded for the first time as part of this Resurvey Project date from 1963-1965...(10 NE 5th Street) is part of a block-long cohesive group built during that time period... Extend the Period of Significance to 1970, based on the historical and architectural significance of the Post World War II period in the development of Del-Ida Park." The justification provided above by the City's Consultant was a result of extensive research including the City's records, the Delray Beach Historical Society's records, and field surveys. Alternatives 2 and 3: These alternatives were requested by the Board in response to owners of properties containing structures built after 1959 and who voiced their opposition to the reclassifications at the HPB meeting of April 15, 2009. Alternative 4 Staff's proposal of Alternative 4 is provided See Staff's Analysis of the 4 alternatives below. Analysis Alternative 1: Alternative 1 has been provided in the resurvey report which was prepared by a qualified professional knowledgeable in historic preservation, architectural history, and historic site surveys, among other qualifications. As a result of extensive research on the Del-Ida Park Historic District, a recommendation was made to extend the POS to 1970 and that those eligible and qualifying structures (48) are reclassified as contributing to the historic district. The justification of the POS extension to 1970 illustrates the time frame of the Post WWII impact on Del-Ida Park, not necessarily by the most recent construction date (1965) of a structure recommended for contributing classification. Based on the justification noted in the report (also noted above) and additional information and analysis provided below for Alternative 4, the Board may not find it appropriate to adopt the recommended POS extension to 1970. Alternative 2: Alternative 2 would extend the POS to 1970, and reclassify 38 properties constructed through 1959. Support for the subject alternative would arbitrarily omit eligible resources constructed in a decade in the noted POS and compromise any future attempts at recognizing those structures built in Del-Ida Park after 1959 as significant. Those eligible structures built in the 1960s are of the Contemporary and Ranch styles, both of which are representative of styles constructed in the 1950s. The following is an explanation of the importance of the Contemporary Style, as provided in the resurvey report: Ordinance 15-09; Del-Ida Park Historic District Resurvey HPB Meeting September 16, 2009. Page 6 of 8 "There are many fine examples of Contemporary Style houses that were built during the post World War ll building construction surge in Del-Ida Park. These houses are inspired by the International Style that originated in Europe and later traveled to the United States,... Contemporary style houses in Del-Ida Park have simple, clean lines, highly abstracted, geometric designs and are mostly devoid of any applied decoration. One of the most important features of these buildings is their complete break with traditional, historical models. They rely on massing, new materials and methods of construction and sculptural forms for architectural expression. Most of the houses have flat roofs with broad eaves, may have glass jalousie windows and often an attached carport. These houses were not 50 years old at the time when the Del-Ida Park Historic District was designated, therefore not meeting the age threshold to be considered as contributing structures. It is, however, RJHA's strong recommendation that these houses should be recognized and officially listed as contributing buildings in the Designation Report, for their historical and architectural significance as representative examples of Post-War Era design." As a general note, it is important to consider that while these styles may exist throughout the City as a whole, there is not a large concentration of any single style within any of the City's five historic districts. Therefore, the protection of any of the eligible resources is important in maintaining the historic environment of each district. Based on the emphasis provided in the report (also noted above) on the Contemporary-style and significance of Post-WWII development subsequent to 1959, the Board may find that it would not be appropriate to adopt the recommended POS extension to 1970, while reclassifying 38 structures built through 1959, and omitting the 10 identified structures built between 1960 and 1965. Alternative 3: \) Alternative 3 would extend the POS to 1959 and reclassify 38 properties constructed through 1959. Revising a POS to the end of a decade for the sake of omitting structures built subsequent to this time period is only justifiable when the end of the decade actually coincides with the end of a historical period. The subject alternative would arbitrarily omit a decade in the noted POS along with the noted eligible resources from this decade. Those eligible structures built in the 1960s are of the Contemporary and Ranch styles, both of which are representative of styles constructed in the 1950s. These omissions would have the potential of compromising any future attempts at recognizing those structures built in Del-Ida Park after 1959 as significant. Based on the emphasis provided in the report (also noted above) on the Contemporary-style and significance of Post-WWII development subsequent to 1959, the Board may find that it would not be appropriate to revise the recommended POS extension from 1970 to 1959, while reclassifying 38 structures built through 1959, and omitting the 10 identified structures built between 1960 and 1965. Alternative 4 �As an additional alternative, Staff suggests that the Board consider extending the POS to 1965, as opposed to the recommended 1970. The reduction to 1965 would maintain the reclassification of 48 properties, as no potentially eligible properties were identified after 1965. It is likely that properties over 45 years old were not considered as it is common practice to evaluate resources up to 45 years old, and not younger unless compelling evidence noting its significance has been presented. For example, when Delray Beach designated its first four historic districts in 1988, the POSs for those districts were established at 1943, and those eligible structure built between 45 and 49 years prior were classified as contributing to those districts. While this practice may contradict the arbitrary interruption of a historical time period, Policy A-4.2 of the Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Element notes, "In order to protect the City's historic resources, the Land Development Regulations shall include provisions for designation of historically significant buildings, structures, archaeological sites, or districts. The City Ordinance 15-09; Del-Ida Park Historic District Resurvey HPB Meeting September 16, 2009; Page 7 of 8 shall conduct periodic neighborhood surveys to identify and evaluate potential historic resources at least once every five years."With this adopted policy to conduct surveys at least once every five years, it is unlikely that any potential historical resources within a designated historic district would be unprotected as they would be reviewed at least every five years. Further, the City's historic district records would be consistently up to date. In considering the suggested omission of 1965-1970 from the POS, this Policy would ensure that those years will be reviewed no later than 2014. Based on the justification noted in the report regarding the significance of Post-WWII development and the emphasis provided on the Contemporary-style, the Board may find it appropriate to adopt the recommended POS extension to 1965, and reclassify 48 structures as listed in Exhibit A. National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) As previously noted, the resurvey report recommends that the City seek application for listing of the Del-Ida Park Historic District on the NRHP. It should be emphasized that the subject Ordinance recognizes this recommendation but upon adoption the Ordinance will not automatically put forward an application for NRHP listing. Once the City is prepared to seek listing on the NRHP, additional steps will be required for application submittal which would include, but not be limited to, a workshop with property owners, and public hearings held by both the HPB and City Commission. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(M)(5), Findings, the City Commission must make a finding that the text amendment is consistent with and further the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Ordinance 09-08 amended the LDRs to provide for Section 4.5.1(N), Criteria for Change of Historic Classification. During the review period for Ordinance 09-08, the reviewing and/or approving bodies found the amendments to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as follows: • The Historic Preservation Board held a Public Hearing for Ordinance 09-08 at its August 6, 2008 meeting. • The Planning and Zoning Board held a Public Hearing for Ordinance 09-08 at its August 18, 2008 meeting. • The City Commission held a Public Hearing/First Reading for Ordinance 09-08 at its September 3, 2008 meeting, and a Public Hearing/Second Reading at its September 16, 2008 meeting. Therefore, the subject Ordinance may be found to be in compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan as it is in compliance with LDR Section 4.5.1(M), Criteria for Change of Historic Classification. REVIEW BY OTHERS The CRA will review the subject Ordinance at its meeting of September 24, 2009, when a recommendation will be made to the City Commission. ALTERNATIVES 1. Recommend approval to the City Commission of Ordinance 15-09, accepting the resurvey report for the Del-Ida Park Historic District, including extension of the Period of Significance to 1970, reclassification of 48 properties from Non-Contributing to Contributing. Ordinance 15-09; Del-Ida Park Historic District Resurvey HPB Meeting September 16,2009; Page 8 of 8 2. Recommend approval to the City Commission of Ordinance 15-09, accepting the resurvey report for the Del-Ida Park Historic District, including extension of the Period of Significance to 1970, and reclassification of 38 properties from Non-Contributing to Contributing. 3. Recommend approval to the City Commission of Ordinance 15-09, accepting the resurvey report for the Del-Ida Park Historic District, including extension of the Period of Significance to 1959, and reclassification of 38 properties from Non-Contributing to Contributing. 4. Recommend approval to the City Commission of Ordinance 15-09, accepting the resurvey report for the Del-Ida Park Historic District, including extension of the Period of Significance to 1965, and reclassification of 48 properties from Non-Contributing to Contributing. RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval to the City Commission of Ordinance 15-09, accepting the resurvey report for the Del-Ida Park Historic District, including extension of the Period of Significance to 1965, and reclassification of 48 properties from Non-Contributing to Contributing. Prepared by:Amy E. Alvarez, Historic Preservation Planner Attachments: • Exhibit A—Recommended Reclassifications • Del-Ida Park Historic District Map • Ordinance 15-09 with Attachments A and B EXHIBIT A— RECLASSIFIED PROPERTY LIST Address Year Style 412 NE 2nd Avenue 1955 Ranch 503 NE 2nd Avenue 1947 Streamline Moderne 706 NE 2nd Avenue 1953 Frame Vernacular 524 NE 3td Avenue 1947 Frame Vernacular 543 NE 3rd Avenue 1955 Contemporary 701 NE 3`d Avenue 1955 Contemporary 703 NE 3td Avenue 1955 Minimal Traditional 209 NE 5th Court 1949 Frame Vernacular 215-217 NE 5th Court 1952 Contemporary 223 NE 5th Court 1947 Contemporary 225 NE 5th Court 1947 Masonry Vernacular 226-228 NE 5th Court 1953 Contemporary 10 NE 5t" Street 1963 Contemporary 14 NE 5th Street 1963 Contemporary 18 NE 5th Street 1963 Contemporary 22 NE 5th Street 1963 Contemporary 102'NE-5th Street 1964 _: Contemporary 106 NE 5th Street 1965 Contemporary 110 NE 5tt' Street . 1965 Contemporary . 215 NE 5th Street 1950 Contemporary 222 NE 5th Street 1953 Contemporary 202 NE 5th Terrace 1951 Masonry Vernacular 204 NE 5th Terrace 1947 Minimal Traditional 216 NE 5th Terrace 1949 Minimal Traditional 234-236 NE 5th Terrace 1954 Contemporary 238-240 NE 5th Terrace 1954 Contemporary 225 NE 5th Street 1948 Minimal Traditional 228 NE 5th Street 1952 Contemporary 10 NE 6th street 1947 Minimal Traditional 11 NE 6th Street 1947 Minimal Traditional 101 NE 6th Street 1949 Contemporary 110 NE 6th Street 1944 Minimal Traditional 116 NE'6th Street 1965 Ranch 14 NE 7t' Street 1965.` Contemporary 102 NE 7th Street 1953 Minimal Traditional 113 NE 7th Street. 1962 Contemporary 14 NE 8th Street 1948 Ranch 216 Dixie Boulevard 1947 Ranch 219 Dixie Boulevard 1950 Contemporary 220 Dixie Boulevard 1947 Ranch 227 Dixie Boulevard 1949 Ranch 228 Dixie Boulevard 1947 Minimal Traditional 240 Dixie Boulevard 1953 Contemporary 109 Fern Court 1954 Ranch 20 Lake Court 1952 Ranch 202 Palm Court 1948 Masonry Vernacular 531 North Swinton Avenue 1947 Masonry Vernacular 721 North Swinton Avenue 1956 Ranch Note:Shaded addresses are those properties omitted from reclassification in Alternatives 2 and 3. '--, 1 , , EL/ 1-1 ST. GEORGE BUSH BOULEVARD r .,,:'•':,. X 'Jg- --,4:-q-4-. , ..4,--; -..e.,- ' ' :"`4,*-..!. J, 721 14 102 110114 714 4,y,•°, -- ...-S.• ,.,t,-,. - -445.->e A41 Li 3,W-=•.-!-'-'*Iip",,X-f s'1%,‘;'41. .!'.-i, .,..e' ,,, .....1. i 706 q,..1, t,,,NO,1,7:, •i- , :,, - ' 1 ,"Si: 'V.; > •.„ , g.1.71q: ,7,,-4., ,-..•.-. , .nk, ap X -, , .4,, ,,,, ,....„ .: ,...,.. . :...-,.....„, ------ 5 -;.,..1,!... 105 li„)39-,,,113 117 ' ‘ ',1„..,; '-44140-" , '3--1...„-e , „‘ 701 -,< .E-- e% fi`t el' . 4fiLl -"lv ) ' N.E. 7T1-1 ST. c:::, .-4,„:9 -‘..... _3 el, .vv. ‘1..• -,..---_- '''''' ' =.n' H ST. 01418102110 . fi . , 605 41. 4 (<, 4". ,'-i-X , v N.„, t v N..) - ''. lin - - -A • -...j -' - I ..7l 703 '''1.4, t--s: -', -1--- <b. r.3,?- --• '4',4,,.:4 /..:6 15' " ---$&'•' I _ ,., 11 17 101 105 203 .2a .; ,..,„ +:4 701 N.E. 6TH ST. • %-) .6-' - ," -.44V 1 e 531 40 .4,..itk ..n - • • ----,-- . o 110 16 i`‘ CA n 4",.,.•----- 1 ' 1/4CC.. 7,L„, :'--- Ne;‘,...--10,,,,,,..N, ....1i ,04..A„,,, u ri, --,N. , _cc- 4IF;r.,,' ,, .3ItIKJ/1 Lii N's ,3 *46 50 ct., ,..,,e ,, . ..4 'V E > ' 6' ).•/6' 204 V / < A, d' N.E. 5TH TERR. ..- In 543 ' , ,- Vvr k-0:'. Eo 238 li ' 0 524 0" 204 (43 Lv''°D-t': :'',1,01— ' fA64z, C 3 0 43% 7 0 "'- '' '--- ',. •t'Arl--50,--%: I' 70 44t4,0 1.1 rs, cf) in ."-t.-11=ipli: 524 •tikt-15.-"'''-vs---Ar > 77 l N 4.1 ,. 209 .,, cs4 csi '-'zq %,,.-',-ri!„,p-.. 1 .6) N N N -' 't,.---tA0 do ,,,,,.;$,' -IN i1(fa ., tt• ,,,N, "7,P N.E. 5TH CT. ---v 1,et.---..... - ,4;-.... 4:-!; ,...41. ''''' NO...`::*- ', To , co •'.;:tt ' t. u ' • •-,..- ....,,,, , :-.-. .:t-.,,y• :•;sN ....;, -- 210 218 II ..1--,•Ittr.A,,,, 1 .. - ): ,,, '..,,v-4.:-{ri.,! I- 2 9 101 -\,_. ++,4' 503 213 225 . ' 4. . ..A.,z \ cc ,....v.44,4, 111111 k..;:;_-, 4- 0 k I-- L N.E. 5T1-I ST. te„.., .., —, tii€7.-- ( g 7 Z 415 _ , ,„ 0 418 :".4...-4r,:.1."- .v. ...;,,-4,--"''n..,.,,,,,,, '1,..- - , s i"--'1,z,- ts. 1 412 ...1-1-1 ' .,4',..4- " " " ' °4--""` 4)1, ' 0 Cl) 407 1.,t•gik" t..12,:::,`ii.i • ...., ,.. ..L. -?g,. F... '15 n‘ 103 -:%w.i.,z" 401 217 Z LI 403 - 11,...-e „-,•• &kW t.-- LI 4-i.--„, Ak_ 1.) N.E. 4TH ST. > POST < — a , OFFICE 0 I. NEE VAN MIBUITNO-1956 DESKINIATION DEL-IDA PARK N i -=, monzoKrRicurmo HISTORIC DISTRICT NNE commumio-2000 RESURVEY ..111111111111 Crn,OF DEULter BEACH,FL LOCATIONMAP K,:!:t:f. pm, E. vAcAKr PLUMP!:&IMPIC CEPARTEPft — DRiffAi.B4SE MAP 5137E71-- MAP REF: DEL—IDA PARK ORDINANCE NO 15-09 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE RESURVEY REPORT OF DEL-IDA PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT INCLUDING EXTENSION OF THE PERIOD OF SIGNIFICANCE AND RECLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTIES FROM NON-CONTRIBUTING TO CONTRIBUTING, PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, A SAVING CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City retained RJ Heisenbottle Architects, Inc., to resurvey the Del-Ida Park Historic District and the City Commission accepts the survey recommendations to extend the Period of Significance, and seek listing of the district on the National Register of Historic Places; and, WHEREAS, the Del-Ida Park Historic District was originally designated and placed on the Delray Beach Local Register of Historic Places in 1988 with a Period of Significance spanning from 1923-1943; and, WHEREAS, RJ Heisenbottle Architects, Inc. resurveyed the Del-Ida Park Historic District and those properties originally classified as contributing for continued significance and maintenance of historic integrity; and, WHEREAS, RJ Heisenbottle Architects, Inc. resurveyed the Del-Ida Park Historic District and those properties originally classified as non-contributing for current significance and recommends that the Period of Significance be extended through 1970; and, WHEREAS, the Del-Ida Park Historic District was originally significant for its collection of architecture representative of the period from 1923-1943, and is currently significant for its collection of architecture representative of the period from 1944 — 1970. WHEREAS, 48 structures now meet the eligibility criteria for contributing status, attributed to the newer resources built 1944 through to 1965, as these buildings have had alterations completed in an appropriate and compatible manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, or have had alterations which are reversible thereby not compromising the structure's integrity; and, WHEREAS, the Del-Ida Park Historic District was originally and is currently significant under the Secretary of the Interiors Criterion A for significance due to associations with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad pattern of the City's history as one of the first planned residential developments in Delray Beach with representation of the 1920s Land Boom and 1930s settlement following the Land Boom and inclusion of post World War II growth from the 1940s through the 1960s; and, WHEREAS, the Del-Ida Park Historic District was originally and is currently significant under the Secretary of the Interiors Criterion B for significance due to associations with people significant to the City, as one of the early investors was Frederick Henry Link, a Craftsman at Mizner Industries, and whose daughter, Catherine Link Strong was the City's first female Mayor and lived in the neighborhood; and, WHEREAS, the Del-Ida Park Historic District was originally and is currently significant under the Secretary of the Interiors Criterion C for significance as it embodies one or more distinctive architectural styles or types such as the Mission, Mediterranean Revival, Minimal Traditional, Contemporary, Masonry and Frame Vernacular, Ranch, and Streamline Moderne, with the Mission and Mediterranean Revival style containing influences directly from renown Architect Addison Mizner, as Frederick Henry Link was a craftsman at Mizner Industries; and, WHEREAS, Section 4.5.1 of the Land Development Regulations of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach provides for the change of historic classification of historic sites and districts; and, WHEREAS, RJ Heisenbottle Architects, Inc. found that the City should seek listing of the Del-Ida Park Historic District on the National Register of Historic Places; and, WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Board held a duly noticed public hearing in regard to the Final Resurvey Report for the Del-Ida Park Historic District on September 16, 2009 and voted to to recommend of acceptance of the Final Resurvey Report and its recommendations including extension of the Period of Significance to 1970 and changes of historic classification for 48 properties within the Del-Ida Park Historic District; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach adopts the findings in the Final Resurvey Report for the Del-Ida Park Historic District; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach adopts the findings in the Historic Preservation Board Staff Report dated September 16, 2009; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach finds the ordinance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach has conducted a duly noticed public hearing in regard to the adoption of the Final Resurvey Report for the Del-Ida Park Historic District. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the recitations set forth above are incorporated herein. Section 2 That the Final Resurvey Report for the Del-Ida Park Historic District is included as Attachment A. Section 3 That the Period of Significance is extended to 1970. Section 4 That the properties listed in Attachment B are hereby classified as set forth in Attachment A and in accordance with and under the provisions of Section 4.5.1 of the Land Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach, Florida. Section 5 That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed. Section 6 That should any section or provision of this ordinance or any portion thereof any paragraph, sentence or word be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. Section 7 That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon passage on second and final reading. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final reading on this the day of , 200_ ATTEST: MAYOR City Clerk First Reading Second Reading • CITY OF DELRAY BEACH RESURVEY OF FOUR LOCAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICTS ARK DEL-IDA P HISTORIC DISTRICT r •-o,•'',;',-','!,',,'','1-',,-'c't4r,,.,'t—'.,-v 1,i,-'-,s,:'-.:.-t.-;','-z,\-.-,-c,:,i,-,;:,s1,,-f,--,,k",,4.',“,,.—.N-,-.,.'-.!:',:'_z--.,'.-,:.:,:,4,'-:.'-,-,-:•-1..z-.'-.'.s.4--,-::.7.3 jP:-..::'A,—..--'N.:,-,.:.,--,-.--,.--,----•,:,.:-.::,1..'.g,,-,."1,-,%.:-;,--'/:„.A$-,c,'f,.-<.--.t.-,.'t-.•rT:t"-i-.--vo-,-:z,,.',,-„'-,n-...1;;\.;4-..-4.-,--, { * '-at , ,a , may,," ' "" "- 41Ja 4 {� l t'� '� -' S _ f t € ` '+tea Y ,i { #L-s-,_ M. 3i xT i �4ysJ�)s//2'�'��r L Ste+ �_ k...,„. ,F. " • 7- x' pri�j9r.r tit-� Prepared by: R.J. HEISENBOTTLE ARCHITECTS, P.A. January 30, 2009 DEL-IDA PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT HISTORIC SURVEY REPORT INTRODUCTION The City of Delray Beach has retained the firm of R.J. Heisenbottle Architects, P.A. (RJHA) to resurvey four areas within the city previously listed on the Local Register of Historic Places as Historic Districts. The four areas to be studied are Del-Ida Park, Nassau Park, Old School Square, and West Settlers Historic District. RJHA's task will be to prepare individual Survey Reports for each of the four historic districts. These survey reports will include the following information: • Historical overview of the district. • Review existing criteria for determining contributing and non-contributing structures. • Recommendations on extending Periods of Significance, where appropriate, within the district. • Update Florida Master Site File forms for previously recorded structures. • Prepare new Florida Master Site File forms for previously unrecorded structures • Prepare maps and photographs for all sites within the district. These surveys are reviewing all structures located within the locally designated historic districts that are thirty five (35) years or older. Information on structures currently listed is being updated, noting any alterations, relocations and demolitions since the time that the Designation Report was originally prepared. Structures not previously listed, that meet the 35 year or older criteria and that are deemed"contributing"to the historic district, are being added to the Florida Master Site File and are being recommended for inclusion in the Local Register of Historic Places' Historic District Designation Report. To date, RJHA has completed work on the Nassau Park Historic District and on the Old School Square Historic District and the West Settlers Historic District. The Del-Ida Park Historic Survey Report covers the fourth and final area being studied under this project. This report will provide information on those items outlined above, based on: field work; research conducted on City records including building cards and permits; Sanborn map records available at the Delray Beach Planning and Zoning Department; existing historical publications; previous surveys covering the Del-Ida Park Historic District, such as the Historic Resources Survey. Phase II, conducted by Janus Research in 2002; the Delray Beach Historic Sites Survey conducted by John P. Johnson in 1987 and on historical research conducted at the Delray Beach Historical Society. The Del-Ida Park Historic District was officially listed in the Local Register of Historic Places in 1988. A total of 47 sites were listed as individual contributing buildings. Additional contributing sites were identified by the "Historic Resources Survey Report Phase II", conducted by Janus Research in 2002, but were not incorporated as part of the Designation 2 Report. The RJHA Report will update and re-evaluate the information provided in the Janus Report and will make recommendations for additional sites that should be officially listed as contributing structures in the Del-Ida Park Designation Report. BOUNDARIES (See Attachment A: Historic District Map) The Del-Ida Park Historic District is bounded on the north by N.E. 8th Street, on the east by the Florida East Coast Railway, on the south by N.E. 4th Street, and on the west by the east side of N. Swinton Avenue. These are the original boundaries of the development originally platted in 1923. Based on that historical fact, no boundary extension or modification is being recommended for the Del-Ida Park Historic District. CONTEXT The Del-Ida Park Historic District is a 14 block suburban residential area just four blocks north of the heart of downtown Delray Beach. It consists of primarily single family, one story residences, although there are some two story houses and a few duplex structures that were built during the 1950s and 1960s. Although some of the houses have been converted to light office use, the residential character of the area remains fairly intact. The same can be said about the original historic fabric of the structures. Few of the historic houses have been demolished. Only two houses listed on the 1988 Designation Report have been demolished. These were located at 601 N. Swinton Avenue and at 107 N.E. et Street. Most of the houses have survived with relatively few unsympathetic alterations or additions. In several instances additions have been made with respect and sensitivity to the original houses, compatible in design yet clearly distinguishable from the historic portion. Specific examples will be presented in the"Architectural Significance" Section. The original plat was laid out in an interesting and unusual fashion, combining a rectangular grid with a series of diagonal streets. Most notable is Dixie Boulevard, which serves as the main concourse in the development, having been laid out 20 feet wider than the rest of the streets. The combination of rectangular and diagonal street design produces a series of unusual triangular blocks and lots with varying street frontage. There are three small public parks that, along with well landscaped grounds and mature trees, contribute to the overall visual quality of the neighborhood. HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE Del-Ida Park is one of the first planned residential developments in Delray Beach. In 1923, the Ocean City Development Company purchased a 58 acre tract in the northeast section of Delray Beach, during the heyday of the Florida Real Estate Boom, and created Del-Ida Park. The development company was organized by Mr. J.C. Secord, of Miami, along with Mr. B.E. Clutter, also of Miami, and Mr. Charles Kuschke of Fort Lauderdale, who planned to open sales offices in Delray(not yet renamed Delray Beach), West Palm Beach and Miami. On 3 September 18, 1923, Del-Ida Park was officially platted and recorded and appears to have been an almost instant success. Del-Ida Park was widely promoted in the Delray News. In a front page article dated September 28, 1923, the newspaper proclaimed that "Del-Ida is growing fast". It goes on to state that 25 of the available 58 lots had been sold and that city water and electricity were being installed. The article also states that"Two beautiful parks are being made and 100's of Australian pines, other trees, flowers and shrubbery are being planted". The newspaper further states that "Mr. Secord and his group bring people daily to visit Del-Ida Park and soon they will have to put more of their lots on the market". On October 19, 1923, the Delray News reported that "Wonderful progress is being made in Del-Ida Park, our new suburb.Nice hard surfaced streets are being run through the property and it is beginning to look like a real town". One of the first investors in the area was Frederick Henry Link, formerly a craftsman of Mizner Industries in West Palm Beach, who in 1923 purchased several lots in Del-Ida Park. Mr. Link soon became the general contractor for the development, and most of the early houses in Del- Ida Park were built by him. That same year he began construction of his own home, located at 524 N.E. 2nd Avenue. The great almost overnight success of the Del-Ida Park was as typical of the Florida Real Estate Boom as its rapid collapse following the Stock Market Crash of 1929 and subsequent years of the Great Depression. Construction continued, but at a much slower pace during the 1930s and 1940s. It was not until the end of World War II that Del-Ida Park experienced a new surge in construction. During the immediate post-war era,Delray Beach saw a marked increase in population, the result of former military personnel stationed in the area that returned and relocated with their families. Del-Ida Park was an attractive middle-class suburban community, centrally located and reasonably priced. Many new houses went up at this time, modest in scale, but representative of the latest trends in architectural design, materials and technology. ARCHITECTURAL SIGNIFICANCE There are many architectural styles represented in Del-Ida Park. Following are examples of the most prevalent ones found within the designated historic district: Frederick Henry Link brought to Del-Ida Park with him the experience he had acquired while working with Addison Mizner in Palm Beach. Inspired by Mizner's grand Mediterranean Revival style houses in Palm Beach, Mr. Link's house set the tone for the architectural style in Del-Ida Park. Smaller in scale and simpler in design, the Link House is mostly Mission style, but with some Mediterranean Revival details, such as the octagonal corner tower and the heavily rusticated doorway surrounds. 4 c ix •,1 / '1^ i/'}:.I 4# r` a .,fib wy1 w 7 .may _.. ' . r f u �Ilir `- a �. .." n r r t Zi E'1, i=E t f$ I ,i,_V .•t� i .r'., �.k-,. ,1 ZyJ.. v-" _.„x„ _`*"tea}i .cu:>; 53 , f 1 •� p i /f 4 n t 'k _ oi1 * �' W:a3td am (g xh i R..�r. bt,,.'1 -� � � F tip. .. {.F -';:r The Link House. 524 N.E. 2nd Avenue (1923) The Mission Style became the predominant design mode for the original houses in the Del-Ida Park development. A scaled down version of the Mediterranean Revival style, the Mission style was widely popular in the 1920s, and its charm and currency made it an important selling tool for the planned residential development. While the Mediterranean Revival style owed its inspiration to the Spanish, Italian and Moorish architecture along the Mediterranean coast, the Mission style was derived from the Spanish Missions in California and New Mexico. In Del- Ida Park, textured stucco surfaces on wood frame structures, flat roofs, molded parapets, scuppers and sparse, if any, applied decorative details were the primary features of the Mission style. Simple designs and inexpensive construction methods made these houses attractive and affordable. A total of 25 of the original Mission Style homes are still standing in Del-Ida Park, although three have seen their original stylistic features altered beyond recognition. These structures have been incorrectly identified as Mediterranean Revival in past surveys. That classification should be corrected in all records. Mission Style Houses bL A1. �1 � R .1T tit{ , _- /Yi ,, V .F!' f lYf� ;4 ,,43.. z+.a7 f ;1 y 11 Dixie Boulevard 102 N.E. 8th Street 214 N.E. 5t''Street The more ornate Mediterranean Revival Style, one of the most popular architectural styles in Florida during the 1920s, is also represented in Del-Ida Park, although not as widely. These buildings are larger, usually two stories and have a greater amount of applied decorative details than the simpler Mission style houses, including arches, a combination of flat and pitched tiled 5 roofs and balconies. One of the best examples of the Mediterranean Revival style may be found in the residence located at 515 N. Swinton Avenue. The fact that it was originally built outside Del-Ida Park at 324 N.E. 2nd Avenue and relocated to its present site in 1961, may explain the anomaly of its more ornate, larger scale within this historic district. The apartment building at 401 N.E. 2nd Avenue is also Mediterranean Revival by its more elaborate design, although its bell-shaped central parapet still harks back to the Mission style. Several of the original Mission style buildings have been modified through additions and alterations into Mediterranean Revival designs. These will be covered in the "Additions and Alterations" Section below. Mediterranean Revival Style : 1 > z,--r J f .. �v....r � � `fir � s �'7 y ><_ F r � -,.--,:,,.., - -,.i,.thsiri I,roto,-,,,,: --i.o. ...s„, I? -,,,,,-,_ 1_,;,,,., ,i , „Al, ,,,,,,A;,,,,,,..„.. ,..4,...,_ i.,,,,I; , t, f�' iL 7�� ` -.t I 5�J t v 1 i ,?. AI. �� ..T -,. y;,_ i `` hi3�. •. S l�� Ca uGr, 4 � F i vs r a^ 'vt1 1... ., .1 View,¢ 1 s, , .r 401 N.E. 2nd Avenue 515 N. Swinton Avenue Several fine examples of the Minimal Traditional Style are also found in Del-Ida Park. These generally date back to the 1930s to 1950s decades, built originally during the Depression era, and show simple, sober designs with some modest detailing harking back to more traditional styles. Some of the more typical details for these houses include low to medium pitch gable roofs generally facing front, modest overhangs, prominent chimneys, decorative wood details on gable ends, inset porches supported on decorative wood supports and sparsely used Colonial or other traditional applied decoration, such as door and window surrounds. 6 Minimal Traditional Style Houses iJS ;'*=-40-3.•','IWI..: ..,i-,••; i k . --%,,,,.-;,...t1 is-10011 • - , — ..-1 I, - g# JRJ 3irox. `'.litlk.x- �k''�sid� l " . " "M .71 . t''b 204 N.E. 5th Terrace 706 N.E. 2 lt'Avenue 105 N.E. 6th Street There are many fine examples of Contemporary Style houses that were built during the post World War II building construction surge in Del-Ida Park. These houses are inspired by the International Style that originated in Europe and later traveled to the United States, where it was eminently established by Mies Van der Rohe and his disciple Philip Johnson, among many others. An even more direct influence can be found in the post-war work of masters like Richard Neutra in California and Paul Rudolph in Sarasota. Contemporary style houses in Del-Ida Park have simple, clean lines, highly abstracted, geometric designs and are mostly devoid of any applied decoration. One of the most important features of these buildings is their complete break with traditional, historical models. They rely on massing, new materials and methods of construction and sculptural forms for architectural expression. Most of the houses have flat roofs with broad eaves, may have glass jalousie windows and often an attached carport. These houses were not 50 years old at the time when the Del-Ida Park Historic District was designated, therefore not meeting the age threshold to be considered as contributing structures. It is, however, RJHA's strong recommendation that these houses should be recognized and officially listed as contributing buildings in the Designation Report, for their historical and architectural significance as representative examples of Post- War Era design. Contemporary Style Houses w r 'N. • sjAl .G� t y li ft ► R f.. 1 kt ' X 'e 3 I -4s- I! IYf r+ i f 4a -st • -4rr :, ' } F.: 215 N.E. 5th Street 222 N.E. 5th Street 240 Dixie Boulevard 7 There is a variety of other architectural styles represented in Del-Ida Park, although not as numerous as the ones identified above. Among the styles that can be found are examples of Frame and Masonry Vernacular, one drastically altered Bungalow, some Streamline Moderne, and several Ranch houses. ADDITIONS AND ALTERATIONS Many of the original structures have been altered and others have been added to, both with varying degrees of success. Some of the original Mission style houses were enlarged during the 1950s. The additions have been successful as statements of their own time, although they may have completely altered the architectural character of the original house. The Mission style house at 217 N.E. 4th Street is no longer recognizable from the front. The addition itself, however, is quite handsome, with a boldly cantilevering carport, and the original building is fairly intact toward the rear of the new structure (See photo below). "' y 4 i .per `. 7 X 4 T .: . 217 N.E. 4th Street Similarly,the house located at 251 Dixie Boulevard is no longer recognizable as Mission style, yet its original simple lines lent themselves quite nicely to its transformation as a Contemporary style structure (See attached photo). r , I - 1 I a _ _ 251 Dixie Boulevard At 204 Dixie Boulevard, the addition is considerably larger than the original Mission style house, yet the original house is still recognizable, and the addition has been done in a manner which is respectful and compatible. The original house has a simple molded parapet, while the 8 parapet on the addition has a continuous banding at the top. In spite of the all the good attributes of the addition, the overall effect and character is now that of a Mediterranean Revival style building, rather than the original Mission style design intent. A less fortunate addition, however, can be seen at 203 Dixie Boulevard, where the original Mission style house is no longer recognizable, and the entire structure has deceivingly and disarmingly become faux Mediterranean Revival. { „ 'f 5., • +s-4 n - v.£ram‘ :T4vi .' yry�f•7� •r ,, dy _ yi/ } a4110 St 1'?L 2• ., Euuab. .1a ,'rat q :. •i 1 � g ' } S '`. � rt '_- , ,;.Y N 44 sii y.7,,.N,. 11-^a ter ill 1/4111±„. 1 ;y.w- 204 Dixie Boulevard 203 Dixie Boulevard Finally, the following two additions are highly successful in their execution. In the house at 110 N.E. 7th Street, the addition is very similar to the original Mission style house, but the connection between old and new is set back, clearly differentiating between the two (See photo below). At 105 N.E. 7th Street, the large two story addition is significantly set back from the original Minimal Traditional style house, and the different massing of the two leaves no doubt where one ends and the other begins (See photo below). r .� .. T7 (tt 4 t 3. .a}• S t r ? � '�' .G F.. .. ti� yi '� J tv • t'L .� `<<�C� •�.y .,r r - . I .� 'aw e$. t... %igt; It ?T! a. li'' tea" 4„..„_- ,.1 4 ").l:tt Y I 'k + ms... .,' ti.t s*-3..; +L h\Yam• l 110 N.E. 7th Street J1 105 N.E. 7`h Street 9 PERIOD OF SIGNIFICANCE One of the objectives of the Delray Beach "Resurvey of Four Local Register Historic Districts" project is to assess the feasibility of expanding the current Period of Significance. Structures thirty five (35) years or older will be recorded in the Florida Master Site File, so that the information contained in the State's database will be not only current but actually ahead of the 50 threshold for historic consideration. This does not mean that structures that are 35 to 50 years old will automatically be deemed contributing, but rather they will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis for possible eligibility. The Del-Ida Park Historic District Designation Report, approved in 1988, places the Period of Significance cut-off date by which structures are to be evaluated at 1943. The cut-off date is based in the generally accepted 50 year old threshold for considering eligibility of structures for listing as "contributing" within a designated historic district. In terms of historical and architectural development, it is difficult to justify this date under any other criteria than the 50 year threshold. The post World War II era was a significant period in the historic and architectural development of Delray Beach. There was a marked population increase, as many GIs stationed in the area relocated with their families after the war. As a result, Delray Beach saw a period of growth in business, tourism, and consequently in job opportunities and therefore an increase in demand for housing. Although the housing shift was mostly towards outlying suburban expansion and away from the center of town, as was typical everywhere else in the country at that time, Del-Ida Park remained an attractive neighborhood, affordable and conveniently close to downtown. This report has already discussed the architectural significance of the Contemporary Style housing built during this era. Many of the structures that RJHA has identified and recorded for the first time as part of this Resurvey Project date from 1963-1965. The house pictured below, for instance, is part of a block-long cohesive group built during that time period, although unfortunately, most have been seriously altered. •.�r. k�'7^' f �{• k ''lam—..... fi41 { • 1 • H j 4 s 10 NE 5th Street Based on the above cited historical and architectural significance of Del-Ida Park in the post-war era, it is our recommendation to extend the Period of Significance to 1970. 10 RE-EVALUATION OF CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES This report has updated and re-evaluated the "District Inventory" provided as part of the 1988 Designation Report, which identified 47 Contributing Structures. Following is a summary of our re-evaluation, which includes sites previously recorded and recommended for inclusion in the Designation Report by the 2002 Janus Report: • Contributing Structures Identified in the 1988 Designation Report 47 • New Contributing Structures per 2002 Janus Report 34 • New Contributing Structures per RJHA Report 19 • Non-Contributing Structures 58 • Demolished Structures 2 NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBILITY The Del-Ida Park Historic District contains sufficient historical and architectural significance as a planned 1920s residential development to be potentially eligible for consideration as a National Register Historic District. A stronger yet case could be made for a Multiple Resource nomination for the original 1920s Mission style buildings in the development. Another option is to pursue individual National Register nomination for the Frederick Henry Link House at 524 N.E. 2nd Avenue, based on Criteria A (for its association with the planned development), Criteria B (for its association with an individual who made a significant contribution to the development) and C (for its architectural significance as a 1920s Mission style-themed development). Any of the above options are feasible and realistic for National Register consideration. FLORIDA MASTER SITE FILES Florida Master Site File forms have been updated for all "Contributing Structures" previously recorded as part of the 1988 Designation Report or as part of the 2002 Janus Report. The following structures will be submitted for addition to the FMSF and new numbers will be requested for them: • 543 NE 3rd Avenue • 701 NE 3rd Avenue • 10 NE 5th Street • 14 NE 5th Street • 18 NE 5th Street • 22 NE 5th Street • 102 NE 5th Street • 106 NE 5th Street • 110 NE 5th Street • 215 NE 5th Street • 222 NE 5th Street 11 • 225 NE 5th Street • 116 NE 6th Street • 721 N Swinton Avenue • 14 NE 7th Street • 113 NE 7th Street • 14 NE 8th Street • 225 Royal Court • 202 Palm Court SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the Del-Ida Park Historic District local designation be amended to reflect the following: • Amend the Inventory contained in the 1988 Designation Report to include the new structures being added to the FMSF as part of this report. • Extend the Period of Significance to 1970, based on the historical and architectural significance of the Post World War II period in the development of Del-Ida Park. • Amend the Inventory to identify the original structures in the Del-Ida Park development as designed in the Mission style, not as Mediterranean Revival, as originally indicated in the 1988 Designation Report and in the 1987 Delray Beach Historic Sites Survey. The breakdown of Mission and Mediterranean Revival style houses within the Del-Ida Park Historic District is provided in the attached "List of Surveyed Resources" in Appendix B. CONCLUSIONS Del-Ida Park is a remarkably cohesive and well preserved neighborhood. Few of the original structures have been demolished and alterations have been, for the most part, relatively benign. Even those structures deemed "Non-Contributing" due to their recent date of construction or unsympathetic alterations maintain a sense of cohesiveness in their scale, setback, use of materials and overall architectural character. The new encroaching development is nearby, but it is yet to cross N.E. 4th Street into Del-Ida Park. There is a palpable sense of pride and identity in the neighborhood residents. The historic district designation has made a positive contribution towards the visual quality and historical integrity of Del-Ida Park. This is evident in the marked improvement in the alterations and additions being made, and in the slowing down of the development pressure that the immediate area is facing. 12 SOURCES • Florida Master Site Files. Delray Beach. • Historic Site Files. City of Delray Beach Planning and Zoning Department. • Building Card Files. City of Delray Beach Planning and Zoning Department. • Property Control Numbers. Property Appraisers Office. City of Delray Beach. • Sanborn Insurance Maps. 1926, 1949, 1963. • Delray Beach Historic Sites Survey. By John P. Johnson. Historic Palm Beach County Preservation Board. July 1987. • Del-Ida Park Historic District. Designation Report. Historic Preservation Board. Delray Beach, Florida. January 15, 1988. By Patricia Cayce. • Historical and Photographic Files. Delray Beach Historical Society. • Delray News. August 17, 1923; August 31, 1923; September 28, 1923; October 19, 1923. Delray Beach Historical Society. • City of Delray Beach.Historic Resources Report. Janus Research. July 1999. • City of Delray Beach. Historic Resources Report. Janus Research. June 2002. 13 APPENDIX A LIST OF SURVEYED RESOURCES 14 DEL-IDA PARK HIS TORIC DISTRICT 11ST OF SURVEYED RESOURCES FMSF M Name Address Date Contd. Non-Conte Demolished PPXX11E5. 51S N Swirl ton Ava-1ua 1929 l'slocitorra nocari Rad®I X P1500189 2 Ctgbe PrZarvrcl 1437 hlaacnsy Vaen?e4Ar X P1300252 19 IXuio B�aicrrerd 1925 hi_=sasl X PB00254 125 Diad Boeie'ratd 1929. Medi*rd 1 R diktat 1 X P500365 203 DUI*Bati'+Yrasrd 1925 ENec#Oecranean Re 6 al X PS00259 204 Dbte E3aet4,0741 1925 M.tidtvn' o w Fbw14411 X P800257 232 Casa Rccicaosd 1929 h£s ca X FBtX 258 236135(it Bexteoeud 1925 h1cs ice X F500293• 306ske Ca4111 1,9i2S AN4aren X P8Ag301 241 Apical Ccurl 1425 M.4cf, X P900302 2A7 Royal Cocoa 1925 hEssca X P803331 418 14 Swirl Eon Avomua 1925 hisaen X P600377 401 NE 2 kateRia 1939 Med:4eeryrraan Rd'n''d1 X P900375 DeFtda Towess p dmesis 524 NE 2 A'rentl0 1923 M[a*ien X PBU3429- UnkNotaa 213tle 5Co4,111 1925 Meson X P900427 9 kE 5 Scrod 1925 hFseioa X PB00428 101 kE 5 Sate/ 1925 k6aados1 X P800429 214 ta 5 Stree4 1925 hSai6on X P800469 110 kE 7 Strata 1925 M34on X P900499 102 NE 8 Scrod 1928 hiss«, X P800470 114 PE 8 Steed. 1925 111s4d41 X F810739 103 P1Er 4 54tt.e4 1935 Maaon ri Verreatter X P010744 C,4.Mcrign licr144 217 PE 4 Scr9A4 1900 M;Mlcn X P910741 219 kE 5 Stroll 1950 htuociEy Vocrocuts X P810742 228IE5Sts eel 1952 Con6ecrpar.9ey X P810744 210PIEW 5Cou1 1917 Fra!»eVerrratuEar X DEL-IDA PARK HISTORIC. DISTRICT LIST OF SURVEYED RESOURCES F013F M Name Address Date Contd. Non-Contr. Demolished P13107,', 216-217 F# 3 Ootrt 12 OontallPo WY X P510745 223F€5Cottt 1947 Colle.rroorsty X P810747 225 F19 5 Cotrt 1947 htv..mry Varnautar X P610743 226.228 F€5Cost 1953 Cw1te+V5rary X PB10750 20211E 5 Ternaue 1951 hba 4,nry Vernactter X FS10751 204 NE 0 Torraco 1947 Mrimat Tradbcrnak X P1310752 2161.1E5 I-Cauca 1949 IVi iinitTradiiorc9t X P910753 234.2S5 tE 5 Terraoa 1954 Conbxrpora y X F1310754 233,243 FE 5 Tertaoe 1954 Carrteovorary X PB10755 11 FIE 13 SO et 1047 MrirW Tradk➢actar X F13107r,9 171"E 0$4c4 1 5 14,:e1 X P1310757 101 FE 9 Soroot 1949 Canb nporay X P1910758 105 PE 6 Street 1939 hi"rirnat Tradlicmi X FB10759 110 Fr¢S titirttt 1944 Ntrimat TradMfcrrat X F'E10750 105 NE 7 Stror.4 1941 Fran-4 Vernacular X P810761 102 FE 7 Stroct 1953 hSrind Todlicm9t X P610763 407 N Swntol Avenue 1941 Niiirrra3 TrstiIfored X P1310707 521 F4SwklpxiAventte 1939 Mrinol'Tra`dlGanat X PS10709 01 onto 1947 hlaconrfVorructkr X P610799 tlOS Fi Swinton AVortuo 1925 hf-don X P610770 109 FernCe+xt 1954 Nil dr X PB10771 14 15x1.Beatever'd 1925 h4rirrral TratlliorosC X FB10772 23Dx14Sotta +rd 1837 FrernoVo eel cukar X PB10774 I Or3Okio 8arkrre d 1030 Etkrucelove X P610775 109 Dixie,Boriewird 1937 h4'rtnred TrodSorxrt X PB10 778 118 Dtde Eat1Nt rd 1933 t,s lan X DEL-IDA PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT LIST.OF SURVEYED RESOURCES PA1SP 0 Name Addtess Date Contd. Non contr Demolished P810777 21900464414.0 d 1947 Rona, X P910778 219nideBactorad 'TA Con tarp:,may X P910779 220 Clio Bariarsd 1947 R,sedh X P810780 2270!tie Barterald 1949 RsIch X P810781 22?ofAft 844twrxcl 1947 Afirimai T1.11444141 X P810762 240DGfaEeacr+ard 1%3 CcoNer emy X P910783 281 Dixie 8cd card 1925 Isim6on'Cadoopormy X P810784 10LakeCarl 1940 AirrealTcsitiortal X F8107a3 la Lake Caul 1941 Freon Vemacube X •--, P810787 23t.40e4Oart 1925 Franr4V4a4a4br X J P91078d 201 k Cult 10 2 Rxedt x P810791 412NE2Avecwe 1955 Rmrfi X P810792 418 NE 2 Avanv a 1975 M 49on X P810793 'S03 NE2 Av40u4 1947 $'44ffe14 Mcd4R14 X P910798 524 Nil 3 Awn)a 1947 Fiona Vo era cu br X P810800 703NE3AYEsw4 1955 AirYm&TradhoedI X P810601 703NE2Avanv4 1953 FreresVemeaprr X P814232. 151E 494441 192E NIA3461 ry V4r1wat e X P814234 107 NE 8 Sevel X P914235 5NE786ee4 1939 FnsaleVe race be X P814236 714 NE 2 Avows 1925 Maeslrrrareeam Ren al X P814237 S43NE3Ax4rraQ 1059 CmtQagewey X P814238 701NE3Avonuo 1901 A4rwel Tod tiarnI X P814239 101E 5 Street 1983 Caneenvermy X FB14240 141E 5S+sa 4 lam Co41lerre01911Y X P014241 18lE 5 59e441 1033 OocllaoW r44Y X DEL-IDA PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT 'HST CF SURVEYED.RESOURCES Fh1sr N Name Address Date Contd, Nan-Cantr. DemoIshed P9t14242 22FE 6Strcwa 193 CmOurPor ry X P914243 1921-E 5&red 1904 CooDonpormy X PB14241 106 FE 5 Strad 1905 Conborrgx y X P814245 1101€5Street 1995 Coiteryporary X P814246 215PE 554'4,4 1993 Conar+rporay X P814247 7221E 0S1rort 1953 Coat rrzyy X P814240 2091E5 Coal 1949 FrarnaVoancuts X P814249 10FE 66tree4 1947 IErtrnnLTndbonal X P814250 1181E 654e44 ii1BS Rind, X 00 P8142 1 1171r 7SOat 1935 Frgsm VarnAmbr X PB14252 11 Cixle Ik tetra d 1925 Msdon X PB14253 701 N Swhban Avenue 1940 hIrimsl Tradaenal X PB14254 1010Ks13adar+rd 1iee hIrtrroVTricitsarsl X P814255 225 t E 5 Str«t 1948 h4rirrrat Tw111onx1 X PB14256 413 NSwhmonAyanuo 1925 Nissa myVorrrxds X PB14257 141E 75tree1 1995 Cry X P814258 14 PE 8 Streel 1948 P ndi X P81424 721 NSwhtoriAvarrrp 1959 Rmil) X P814200 225 Rsrd Coot httscnry Vcrrcxds X PB14261 202 Pam Cote 1948 ht_,mryVcrrosdos X PB14282 113FE7Saect 1952 Conbrr' rry X 101 FE 41'1 Street 1972 Con6mporery X 111 FE 404 Sava 1947 Nixonry Vmnaadx X 4151E 2n1A•ccm, 1995 Frarn Varna max X 511 PE Z11 Awe tM 1954 M ianry Veenactiv X 510FE.2rrlAve lt* 1950 MMmryVerrr?ctl$* X DL-IDS PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT T OF SURVEYED RESOURCES PAISPM Name Address Date Contd. Non-Contr. Demolished 615 tE 2r1d Avon us 1957 Mssen rd Vearaactder X 232 NE Bat St real 1952 Mason rir V:arnactdar X 219 tE 5th Space 1950 Masonry Voercxuts X 200PE5thCaul 1952 MasenrrVetrrx+lea X 2 51h C ul a 1E64 Mtta~In?Vearraadele X 30 NE 201 to 3thCoua 1948 M1a,onrtVarntttdsr, X 2231.E5thCiaur1 1947 brine Vornacuts X 218tE set Teae 1953 MrelonrrVeeracedmr X rx 726 tE 571 Termed* 1954 Maea in Voarracttar X 230-232t1E6hTorrac,a 190 Mlazar,Pit Varnactlar1/40 X 411 N5wit ton Arcauo 1960 AUn SarrVoamcurs X 527 NSwnonAvarrue 1947 MiltonVe rrarrse:faa X 711 t1SwhlCn Avenue 1992 Mlasanrd Vearde der X 41,E 71 h SOW Maaanrd Votrta csdua X 10tE7thSrso4 15d2 PrarrioVairucube X 17 tE711Seteed 1954 Mfssdtir/Yearde d3a X 18 tE 7t1h$ fah/deny*.4 1fah/denyYeardadar X 109tE1t8 401 1947 Frans,Vamaatiar X 110 RE 8tht Sand 1925 Mfstion X 230 PE 8th Shea 1952 Mss xtrr Vaaraccdtr X 117 fsn Court 1957 Pailah X 102 Dafa Rai!board 1948 Masmrr,Voax nedai X 1 12 Dale gcurarard 2007 Masonry Vcamctda X 2430kiaBoufevard 1931 MssenreWaraadar X 2B00aia eau rarad 1972 Modem X _ 235.2249 Reteae Court 1952 Mir Vaaractdar X DEL-IDA P I HISTORIC DISTRICT LIST OF SURVEYED RESOURCES FMSF N Name Address Date Contd. Non-Contr. Demolished 249 Royer Carl 1956 Ccnter+c 'r fy X 10 two Cart 1960 dklgeod Mn 1 X 14 Lzko Cart 1956 E'srdi X 222 PryrnCaut 1556 M.sianry Ve(rrdedtr X Z26 Pe►m Curt 1067 Nbviu my Verrc?ccfar X 2X0 Parrn tout 16d9 Mxonry Vornaccrcr X 431 NE.3 rd Aw rt a 18"3 1.1 san y Vorrectts X 4)5FE.3rd Aso rRre 1938 Mtianr,VeerorAf& X 410NE3rdAven.* 1933 'Oman ryVerrnatar X NO 412 W.Sid Awnw 1000 Masonry Varwctrsr X 415FE9rdAwrrm 1916 15)LsoriefVarcrcdar X 505FE3rdA4krrw 1933 lAtitor?Varrttstfae X 620 F•E 3rd Awmi+ 1947 Maeonry Verrostrx X 629FJE3rdAwrrw 1959 M cerryVeenactf2r X 541 FE 3rd Awrr:sa 19n Maonry Vaructfs X 601hE3MAx+rrub 1055 Nt»altyVmrttsd:itt X 6606ht SKI P4or'rt* 1972 Fawn ryVermaror X 609hC3rtiAwn.+x 1067 Waal ryVonnacrl'ar X 6151,E3rdAvsrzto 1972 MatonriVanrdar X 617.618 NE 3rd Avarro 1972 Mssonry Varur_ds X 621 FE3rdAvert* 1893 Nitta'7Vecreedar X 62SFE3rdAvt+r.* 1f'S7 MaaonryVeeraafer X 702NE8rdAvaroc, 1trA MascnrjVornxcfar X 710F,E9rdAwnuo 1853 MasonrfVanxtdar X 7151E 3n1 fv,erytte 1972 M n 1Verr e:tit, X 723NE3rdAwnu* 190 M>YonrlVornact[or X APPENDIX B DEL-IDA PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT MAP 21 I • ..____ I- - 1 . N.E. I . 9TH I _ 1 1 -ST. zLLijiA - 1 I _._ N.W. 8TH ST. < VS-;-.':'..:11.,-..,':':::i':li-../.1•4. -._trt.'4,:k ,.,,25/-12.VS2t5e' 'i-721',.1 ,44:-A:.ral',,, ''''414f, - • --'• . ..,'-i• -,,A -- — --'- ;A:;.t).iC,.,1'r..-..,•.,11'!4t,,..,,-;LT.-'-7'2• N'.',.,,•-,:;:..'$':-.'''' '.''%-7- -;.:- ..,..C-f';',P: -,..,,Tr'.'—'1' / ST. Jr,:'X:ti,-5,-:,•.,::--,1.-m2.--:.-,::,fe.:::,.4.; ./.-.:;.,.. . ,7z..,' ,... -,-4-=0,-pej: ----•• I' - .-.?6-- - -- .;----,..?, (z...---, ,--4-.:-:;---,,-,7 wag 1 4 NE 7TH ST. -- -...‘,.-,•,,-...T. -,;.• .),N.. .,•:-,--.-,.--,--1, 4,r;-:,--,,R,-..-,.•;i;."4.:11;CA 's ...;,....:-.•,----/ :-.>..,-',4!..-.. -—44,1- ' 1111121.6 ';;•!•.W.E.;"l',--f;ii:4111L161-12-71kill ..-, ,r_•-•.'",:...+-.;:•-r <Z ,--,.:sA,-:.';'=.-----_-"' -Z.-7.7.,:=irz T •col '14•yzi•rvi va9. 107 .VJ4w•-• -,Q: ,.-"f '.-.•..,--,:...- • N.E. 7 •6,t-':.1.'''''',..-,N:•-4-„.-y_f-7,--''..7 0,..„.>.•_,,,,NH-,-i.;-:!-......!.......-f,,,-,,,,,,,,,z,:fp.,...- i.--1,,,,....,.4.... C2.' 6TH' :I- .....`,..7-`,.'ii ' '.'•.. .,.::Zil ., Z.t,>4.:*;','" ..",: •-,.• ,•.,1i. Miff ST. 1 0 z z 4 N.E. 6TH ST. — •.P.,., ,-faz7-,,,...T. D m . I s 1 l l 't ."'/!40 ...,--..,._:::,-,0,:,..,,,,;-,,, p .. ...,:i,,,-..,,,,....:1,,,,, c., ,,,,...,:.,..„,, . . 1 4,Av.,,..,--.. .., ,_ .... .. ' c../,TI.' -.`,.,:111.00,,, CO CO '-..A.._:k-('4'..:k..:46-::,c1--.*',',:.? ' ''''3'.7-"i '''''...'..i -::::,..- l '-',':•:;:: 1 4-'<iii,,,--,'-..-t-1.-i '''-- '''.•::,:i:-..Pr.Z',.:.‘..-..:::-;.-„;.....,:L2... '..-._-.-;-.-- -,. ., • N.E. 5TH TERR. Et -.„,. N.E.N.E.6TH ST. ANE 1 *itf,/, .Z1`,..,Vt.C.f.'0-..,,g- . ,, ,, T-.1t-71,-. ...-- ,-• I,.-..;.,,-;15, 1.0.;:'T--,::' , 4) 1 N -,,ed-,......:_ •, `,....-...-;:, - -,' C'5,..."---,:4 ."- 'T, • .-Ic‘11 -;:..:- '3:i;,,A.:`,,,r` , :,--2. V,4 3,,?;:.:, --• ci z — ci z --- ';• ' ''\,:!. --,LU .-V-ti- •-/':::.,-.'' c,,z'-9'n''41'2(-1'' .t:11,1 Mi,)7z)kv94!,-; .:,:;:..-'.', )-: —, . '4,,,-,$ 592 ---"'--..-7 i 3-r:,. •., "II cl..r'4'4-.:;4 . ;,'..--;-....,.. , :1: i •,- A -- _Li •...r..,„.-.,,,,,.:::,' ., N.E. 5TH CT. ..":',:'.4'.-3;7 vi vj > .,-'''••- C: -.-'. .:---T 5;"'''''' ,,'-','"'S'"'' 1 ,-- ' '"' 11 '.',-'..,s5'T,. -Anal---.L zt.:,,y - ,..-•4e!-T--,..:i=',.:;:e.5;?:-.,-;:.,..."F`i 7c77.70.1.PY,,21 ',5,164-,I'll ii:;`,-,-,-Ii-;z: s---' PUBLIX — N.E. l, IL ?..:77-....„;:-/:!;1 o 5:4';?;-'":.4.,`4,"•-- -.'c&•/) .:7'1:5P34,. J5-:5,'-','- ..' ,:- '-' a 4'i-k,',:i.!iril.4`17-i,,t....:%!,:lr,e(4,. ..,..„!t,.•",:;.gA„.„.::z.,..r.:,.4 .:,•i-':1.,i.-.',' 0 -.:- TR INI TY N.E. 5TH ST. ..-..,..)•..2 5 ,,,, -:! , i x LUTHERAN ,7-fc-jw- .,,-,_1,, •,1-4.8,:s ,:-.,..11 :i.:., ''17'i'..'i' ",,i-:-::::- ;::: cs -J —1 _ L.., < < (.• WA L— C6 fi'i-i'Y'' •''''''f..i..- 31 73'.."-'-,''''': -' ,'"... CI GREENS a '6-11 5,i,Lri- '-,%.'.'!'::,',.•..:,-.. ...:.---RIA-,-fi',.. ,ffMt..1.--:';k.:-....,:,,,,,: --.--!,':- r,...1.1..) -,,,_j______„/LLI-LI,. . • Z `..j- 0 POST < _ > < — CASON 1-- >Z L u_i METHODIST OFFICE --z7- - csi < a CHURCH iii SI' 0 _ ,-) -- . -- L.; - 0 m , _ i = 0 1— u-) (0 LO ____ 0- F- 0- Z - 6: Lj 11.j Z Z • 3RD ST. N.E. 3RD ST. I . _ 3RD ST. DEL-I DA PARK 1,,,,_,........„,„4.CONTRIBUTING-ON DESIGNATION REPORT N 1,..___ I CONTRIBUTING-NEW ---allar HISTORIC DISTRICT 0IY OF DaRAY VF-AOR.FL 1,4.-%T.,-,<-1 NON•CONTRIBUTING PLANNING 1.4 20IIIIIC OFPARDAZIT ADDRESS DISTRICT MAP 1 _. _ I DEMOLISHED -- VISIT:AL a4SE MAP SYSTEM-- MAP REF:DEL-IDA PARK 1,1.771141,F0.24710/4 CSEAllf.r.;fiLD UNION 22.1353 AYFYIOX.W.fEACRFAC.C:53.2.5 f . 1 Ordinance 15-09 Attachment B Del-Ida Park Historic District Property Classification List Address Classification Year Style Built 401 NE 2nd Avenue Contributing 1936 Mediterranean Revival 412 NE 2nd Avenue Contributing 1955 Ranch 415 NE 2nd Avenue Non-Contributing 1995 Frame Vernacular 418 NE 2nd Avenue Contributing 1925 Mission 503 NE 2nd Avenue Contributing 1947 Streamline Moderne 511 NE 2nd Avenue Non-Contributing 1954 Masonry Vernacular 518 NE 2nd Avenue Non-Contributing 1950 Masonry Vernacular 524 NE 2nd Avenue Contributing 1923 Mission 615 NE 2nd Avenue Non-Contributing 1957 Masonry Vernacular 706 NE 2nd Avenue Contributing 1953 Frame Vernacular 714 NE 2nd Avenue Contributing 1925 Mediterranean Revival 401 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1968 Masonry Vernacular 405 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1968 Masonry Vernacular 410 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1968 Masonry Vernacular 412 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1968 Masonry Vernacular 415 NE 3`d Avenue Non-Contributing 1968 Masonry Vernacular 505 NE 3`d Avenue Non-Contributing 1968 Masonry Vernacular 520 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1947 Masonry Vernacular 524 NE 3`d Avenue Contributing 1947 Frame Vernacular 525 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 2001 Masonry Vernacular 541 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1968 Masonry Vernacular 543 NE 3rd Avenue Contributing 1955 Contemporary 601 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1955 Masonry Vernacular 605 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1972 Masonry Vernacular 609 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1957 Masonry Vernacular 615 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1972 Masonry Vernacular 617-619 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1972 Masonry Vernacular 621 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1956 Masonry Vernacular 625 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1957 Masonry Vernacular 701 NE 3rd Avenue Contributing 1955 Contemporary 702 NE 3`d Avenue Non-Contributing 1953 Masonry Vernacular 703 NE 3rd Avenue . Contributing 1955 Minimal Traditional 710 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1953 Masonry Vernacular 715 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1972 Masonry Vernacular 723 NE 3rd Avenue Non-Contributing 1968 Masonry Vernacular 15 NE 4th Street Contributing 1925 Masonry Vernacular 101 NE 4th Street Non-Contributing 1972 Contemporary 111 NE 4th Street Non-Contributing 1947 Masonry Vernacular 200 NE 5th Court Non-Contributing 1952 Masonry Vernacular 201 NE 5th Court Non-Contributing 1948 Masonry Vernacular 209 NE 5th Court Contributing 1949 Frame Vernacular 210 NE 5th Court Contributing 1917 Frame Vernacular 215-217 NE 5th Court Contributing 1952 Contemporary 218 NE 5th Court Contributing 1925 Mission 223 NE 5th Court Contributing 1947 Contemporary 1/4 Ordinance 15-09 Attachment B Del-Ida Park Historic District Property Classification List Address Classification Year Style Built 225 NE 5th Court Contributing 1947 Masonry Vernacular 226-228 NE 5th Court Contributing 1953 Contemporary 229 NE 5th Court Non-Contributing 1947 Frame Vernacular 230 NE 5th Court Non-Contributing 1954 Masonry Vernacular 232 NE 5th Street Non-Contributing 1952 Masonry Vernacular 219 NE 5th Street Non-Contributing 1950 Masonry Vernacular 9 NE 5th Street Contributing 1925 Mission 10 NE 5th Street Contributing 1963 Contemporary 14 NE 5th Street Contributing 1963 Contemporary 18 NE 5th Street Contributing 1963 Contemporary 22 NE 5th Street Contributing 1963 Contemporary 101 NE 5th Street Contributing 1925 Mission 102 NE 5th Street Contributing 1964 Contemporary 106 NE 5th Street Contributing 1965 Contemporary 110 NE 5th Street Contributing 1965 Contemporary 214 NE 5th Street Contributing 1925 Mission 215 NE 5th Street Contributing 1950 Contemporary 219 NE 5th Street Non-Contributing 1950 Masonry Vernacular 222 NE 5th Street Contributing 1953 Contemporary 225 NE 5th Street Contributing 1948 Minimal Traditional 228 NE 5th Street Contributing 1952 Contemporary 202 NE 5th Terrace Contributing 1951 Masonry Vernacular 204 NE 5th Terrace Contributing 1947 Minimal Traditional 216 NE 5th Terrace Contributing 1949 Minimal Traditional 218 NE 5th Terrace Non-Contributing 1953 Masonry Vernacular 226 NE 5th Terrace Non-Contributing 1954 Masonry Vernacular 230-232 NE 5th Terrace Non-Contributing 1956 Masonry Vernacular 234-236 NE 5th Terrace Contributing 1954 Contemporary 238-240 NE 5th Terrace Contributing 1954 Contemporary 10 NE 6th street Contributing 1947 Minimal Traditional 11 NE 6th Street Contributing 1947 Minimal Traditional 17 NE 6th Street Contributing 1925 Mission 101 NE 6th Street Contributing 1949 Contemporary 105 NE 6th Street Contributing 1939 Minimal Traditional 107 NE 6th Street Contributing --- Demolished —2005 110 NE 6th Street Contributing 1944 Minimal Traditional 116 NE 6th Street Contributing 1965 Ranch 4 NE 7th Street (531 N Swinton Ave) Non-Contributing Masonry Vernacular 5 NE 7th Street Contributing 1939 Frame Vernacular 10 NE 7th Street Non-Contributing 1999 Frame Vernacular 14 NE 7th Street Contributing 1965 Contemporary 17 NE 7th Street Non-Contributing 1954 Masonry Vernacular 18 NE 7th Street Non-Contributing 1969 Masonry Vernacular 102 NE 7th Street Contributing 1953 Minimal Traditional 105 NE 7th Street Contributing 1941 Frame Vernacular 2/4 Ordinance 15-09 Attachment B Del-Ida Park Historic District Property Classification List Address Classification Year Style Built 109 NE 7th Street Non-Contributing 1999 Frame Vernacular 110 NE 7th Street Contributing 1925 Mission 113 NE 7th Street Contributing 1962 Contemporary 117 NE 7th Street Contributing 1939 Frame Vernacular 14 NE 8th Street Contributing 1948 Ranch 102 NE 8th Street Contributing 1925 Mission 110 NE 8th Street Contributing 1925 Mission 114 NE 8th Street Contributing 1925 Mission 230 NE 8th Street Non-Contributing 1962 Masonry Vernacular 2 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1937 Masonry Vernacular 11 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1925 Mission 14 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1925 Minimal Traditional 19 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1925 Mission 23 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1937 Frame Vernacular 101 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1939 Minimal Traditional 102 Dixie Boulevard Non-Contributing 1948 Masonry Vernacular 106 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1930 Bungalow 109 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1937 Minimal Traditional 112 Dixie Boulevard Non-Contributing 2007 Masonry Vernacular 118 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1930 Mission 125 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1928 Mediterranean Revival 203 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1925 Mediterranean Revival 204 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1925 Mediterranean Revival 216 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1947 Ranch 219 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1950 Contemporary 220 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1947 Ranch 227 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1949 Ranch 228 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1947 Minimal Traditional 232 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1925 Mission 236 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1925 Mission 240 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1953 Contemporary 243 Dixie Boulevard Non-Contributing 1961 Masonry Vernacular 250 Dixie Boulevard Non-Contributing 1972 Modern 251 Dixie Boulevard Contributing 1925 Mission/Contemporary 109 Fern Court Contributing 1954 Ranch 117 Fern Court Non-Contributing 1957 Ranch 10 Lake Court Contributing 1940 Minimal Traditional 14 Lake Court Non-Contributing 1956 Ranch 18 Lake Court Contributing 1941 Frame Vernacular 20 Lake Court Contributing 1952 Ranch 26 Lake Court Contributing 1925 Frame Vernacular 30 Lake Court Contributing 1925 Mission 202 Palm Court Contributing 1948 Masonry Vernacular 222 Palm Court Non-Contributing 1956 Masonry Vernacular 226 Palm Court Non-Contributing 1957 Masonry Vernacular 3/4 • Ordinance 15-09 Attachment B Del-Ida Park Historic District Property Classification List Address Classification Year Style Built 230 Palm Court Non-Contributing 1959 Masonry Vernacular 225 Royal Court Non-Contributing 1997 Masonry Vernacular 235-239 Royal Court Non-Contributing 1952 Masonry Vernacular 241 Royal Court Contributing 1925 Mission 247 Royal Court Contributing 1925 Mission 249 Royal Court Non-Contributing 1956 Contemporary 403 North Swinton Avenue Contributing 1925 Masonry Vernacular 407 North Swinton Avenue Contributing 1941 Minimal Traditional 411 North Swinton Avenue Non-Contributing 1956 Masonry Vernacular 415 North Swinton Avenue Contributing 1925 Mission 515 North Swinton Avenue Contributing 1925 Mediterranean Revival 521 North Swinton Avenue Contributing 1939 Minimal Traditional 527 North Swinton Avenue Non-Contributing 2007 Masonry Vernacular 531 North Swinton Avenue Contributing 1947 Masonry Vernacular 605 North Swinton Avenue Contributing 1925 Mission 701 North Swinton Avenue Contributing 1940 Minimal Traditional 711 North Swinton Avenue Non-Contributing 1962 Masonry Vernacular 721 North Swinton Avenue Contributing 1956 Ranch 4/4 .�. _ A r1 Zi --Z�; cl -, cd,- ,,,v,- Ad / ) i A,.2_---- / .----- _‘ ‘ ' L_Crz,_ 1 _ z1 7 k (7 ..) '&_ .. ______,,/ _____ea,i_. , , • 9,o __ ,__, /` 7 /,p r-,<.--‘ .71 c__. cJi". � y .. , , . - 0 , `° o -- ,cj Y/ ,,, - - ,'�v / �- ,e ,v ) , / / / v ,.)--7.,, ,— —s--- / / 1C9 -- _, .�'cL • / —1 A - ei, (-0 , /97 ) \ y-- v___‘ 9.- 6 f°e ‘ __r c e3 '., q © i / q7d D (r) -,.."/44„ 1;Al cgs 3) 9 - d ( (to / oV"---71 N e� c , '4 C . ''( Li _______- ,--- at* /i - 9fL4-' /e/-1 iV . '7 2/ ' ----- ,,i. .± ,,..._ -'1 2 ___,i ' -) ,4, -• N .) c ---- __-,j,____,\ 4-- 6-.74$ ____ t3) ) ‘ ,/`-'' , .? Lr- YL' `-'2 11a „) --...,62...„- L.) ,-. :.6 "a. j---1)0 O t: ` IV3 , e_D, 4,,, ) .,_, ,v .__c. 4-- f c) Q- : c L i tom,; to 4 LI ,„[,2) 17/ _ .),..7 I . ...... j______._ ___7,._ -) / , c----) _ /- 62/' / ,Th , ( 2/ 9 111 _ /%0/17iv4 Ji( •N .----". --,- ---, I i _ ,--2---p 9 ,,eiff,__ -- I _ ____ -fr / - \ ri, ,t ,- /ice j;t)-- ) ? ` ) 6 - b -61 ,y//, G C ,eitza_ 3 / > ) , . --.%. Cc.i. eiv -02--- 27C .- r_.) -- -7/ /1- - , ortm.----e -) rr ‘ ) / ____ ___--------"-- Ot'k3 ' 0;Zdai-- );:: 0,..,b I ,a2 j- ___ to - - -- iii0,-"77. n D ____ e„._. \ _p__, --)- ) X---°. ,----- ems /71//' '( ‘2,e/'/ ) (10.1:7 ,._al------3/ ,,..------,--- __ .._--Th__ )-- ' Z s____,-- . .m lb„..4___N d- " 44 ' ____:ZA1) )61- ,.3 , r-'' .) / I _ !i-' I -A,Ir--- A - / ,, , , ., , Ar 6 6 - ) 0014. ./1 "--- y T ,-2-,-- -- - r ... .eri c::7— c) la-1---l___/ , --- - 2----- _ . -7 , ,- / 7—' r _____--,....) ('' -- --‘ . - - - -e4 Z.= -------(/ 7 c_z )/J Y (ter - _ ./1 ' 17/ e4 ( . . az/IPA) n 6 Y 1 .0"-• '-.2.-/A-1-1, i\q_\ — , _____,,,, / - - - ) c: '' ---91 ��rr / a kVA.: A,v6' Gr- A 0_...... • ,!_ ; " ' AA/M � L� - Ilv NEW . (--g-- ,- 4-114.--J-. _ j,_ =, I 4 1 II �.�- i ''.-- - WNW ( - 'Aiwa 9IMF \ -' _ . / g' LP , --... .,.., , 2111NIr...... , ,, 6 4 3---b 0 ) t-- L - • .1/7.p3— . 5) a)//) 0) / G r 07- 1 , vr -o7 � d 4J, 4JOJ) h (2.7 A-zP// — /I -7 /j( )2 - 4 ( —/41Z-1 )4A--e9 "3 . e (2,IttyL _ 7'.-1 i'")L c=„7. if 617 ) .off 171-b—NL / • 77- • c�— J :_ —U �l ■�� Ib —�y��lly�u- j.r� �- o'er .< 2 'L4 ) /. / 0 -7-2 e ,:i/ i7L__ • 1 • )74--- 9, , , ":.) Le \. / 9 2 / so___20 it 14) Cam, — Q - ,_�� e.Jr, ) z �-r-- r G 9 7- Gib a — — 1/%%ii - �I - --'-...amminor . /4._j-- ,72_,‘"___a} - /‘&1, U fr-e.,ic ,/ --L, /'-al) \ _ acr24,1- 1,,k__, ----- . ,----4--1,/1 ��7 w �� d 7 r er4.i ' , �/..--T _cp_i__- -maiig J---,r- , ---, r's -ical r- ,` ,--,;_r-fr r 4-- , 1....... , .,.,..,p2/ .,--,6, "A-4'.,---- e-c> , VT Srs )----- /1 — ' ._._____Z____r . C 2, jd- `-_ / •\ 4 i:/,„...,7 __0 . dbyv&L-k 1 i ) 1 // . ,_ _ ( N 7‘/ A__. /9 1 ze-\.124 } \ Th't:A) rAze--z-a4 - () Y y'-'`-' „(1 -11--/ r __ ./ A - X '/ _Oil,c1,3__e_ \ _____41! c,„ i --D . _ , d 9 / a 9 ;—t - 1J \ - • ' -12, - ,.. ' V "7 a) — 3 — y ,� i U��' . 1 &/zellti( / 0 ,o)xJ( 2 A GS) n->,-y) .c9. e/yuLD vo) ae,v--- / 044- 2----166, / 9 6 , D- . I ' v t `2-2 • (5:70,"'N (2,tt /471D \ ' 4‘114.u. ) N /2— 9 c ?L• V ) )IA ‘/ 9 ea " 6<• LA° -10" OWnligi _rnl ; . h' I ,12 3 1/2'4'.7:: 2 / s-, '1P4' -€A--..17 a'17 / //' v ) � . :) •r7 b 4-- . • • • • t m 10 L , ,-, „,, ... ; , . . , ,.,„ , , , 77), . ; 77iviA??4-\c- •