Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
HPB 09-04-08
A GENDA qr HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: September 4, 2008 Time: 6:00 P.M. Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: City Commission Chambers The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service,program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Smith at 243-7144 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing,such persons will need a record of these proceedings,and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Two or more City Commissioners may be in attendance. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: • March 15, 2006 • May 2,2007 • August 15, 2007 • January 3, 2007 • July 11,2007 • February 7,2007 ■ August 1, 2007 V. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A.246 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District — Gregory Paige, Property Owner; Metal Shield, LLC, Authorized Agent. Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness (2008-225) for the installation of accordion shutters on a non-contributing structure. B.154-170 NW 5th Avenue, Spady Cultural Complex, West Settlers Historic District — EPOCH, Applicant; City of Delray Beach, Property Owner; Judson Architecture, Inc., Authorized Agent. Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness and Class II Site Plan Modification (2008-234-SPI- CL2) for improvements to the subject property. V.I. REPORTS AND COMMENTS • Public Comments • Board Members • Staff V.I1. ADJOURN a L Curt.t&z Amy E. Alvarez Historic Preservation Planner Posted on:August 29,2008 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA MEETING DATE: March 15, 2006 LOCATION: City Commission Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Francisco Perez-Azua, Randee Schatz, Maura Dersh, Michelle Reich, Joanne Peart MEMBERS ABSENT: Linda Lake, John Miller, Jr. STAFF PRESENT: Amy Alvarez, Brian Shutt, Denise Valek I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Perez at 6:07. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Ms. Schatz, seconded by Ms. Reich and approved 5 to 0 (Ms. Lake and Mr. Miller absent) to approve the Minutes of February 15, 2006 as written. III. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS A. LDR Initiated Text Amendment to Sections 2.4.6(E) and 4.6.19, and the definition section as it relates to protection of"Historic Trees". Item Before the Board: Recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Board Ms. Alvarez outlined the Staff Report regarding this item and stated that staff recommended the Board recommend approval to the Planning &Zoning Board. At this point on the Agenda, Ms. Valek swore in all individuals for testimony. Public Comments Ms. Annette Annechild and Ms. Kathy Degroot spoke and expressed their concern with the seemingly increasing removal of trees within the City and both stated they were in favor of this Amendment. Chairman Perez asked if there were any others who wished to comment. There were none and he closed the Public Comments. There was no discussion by the Board members. It was moved by Ms. Reich, seconded by Ms. Dersh, and approved by a 5 to 0 vote (Ms. Lake and Mr. Miller absent)to recommend approval to the Planning &Zoning Board. Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes—March 15, 2006 B. 6-Month Moratorium of Demolitions, Additions, and New Construction in the City's Five Historic Districts. Item Before the Board: Recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Board Ms. Alvarez advised that the Ordinance had been revised and passed out the revised copy to the Board members and advised the public that they were available for them as well. Ms. Alvarez then outlined the Staff Report and explained the revisions to the Ordinance. She further stated that Staff recommendation to the Board is that they recommend approval of the Moratorium to the Planning and Zoning Board. Public Comments Mr. Jim Brady, an attorney practicing in Ft. Lauderdale addressed the Board. He stated he had been on the Historic Preservation Board in Ft. Lauderdale for ten years and understood the importance of the decisions to be made by this Board. He said he opposed this Moratorium Ordinance as it affects one of his clients. He said his client was present and will also be speaking. Mr. Brady further stated that at their December 2005 meeting the Board had approved a COA for the demolition of a structure on a lot that was purchased by his client in order to build his home on it. He said building plans had been drawn up but if this moratorium was approved, it would significantly affect his client. He further stated if the moratorium was approved he thought anyone who had been granted a COA by the Board in the past year should be exempted from this moratorium. Mr. Brady then said that in his thirty years as a City Attorney he did not recall any moratorium that had not been extended beyond the original time frame. Mr. Enrique Martinez Celaya, the purchaser of the aforementioned lot, addressed the Board and passed out a hand-out to the Board, the contents of which he then read to the audience. He said a moratorium in the City of Delray Beach is a bad idea for the following three reasons: 1) The City possesses the infrastructure to evaluate projects on a case-by-case basis; 2) The position of building restrictions does not prevent mansionization, as the City Manager says, but rather discourages and limits affordability as the paper enclosed in your package shows conclusively; and 3) It is too expensive, in Delray Beach, for any homeowner/investor who restores houses in poor condition. Mr. Celaya then made further comments on the above three points. Ms. Annette Annechild, 300 North Swinton Avenue, addressed the Board and said she appreciated the Board considering this item and thinks that it was a good idea to stop and look and think. She stated she definitely supported this proposal. Mr. Louie Gardella, 329 NE 71h Avenue, said he was in favor of the moratorium as he thought it would slow the mansionization, but that he had some questions about properties in the Historic Districts. Chairman Perez advised him he would have to wait until the end of the meeting when the Board could answer public comments. 2 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes—March 15, 2006 Mr. Pete Dwyer, 711 Seagate, stated he was a twenty-one (21) year resident of Delray Beach and that he was very familiar with the Historic Districts. He said he was vehemently opposed to the moratorium. He said the review process was already in place and this proposal would only raise prices for anyone buying property in Delray. He further stated he thought the energy of "Save Delray" was misguided. Mr. Dwyer said most residents are upset over the proliferation of townhomes and condos going up on every corner with higher densities than were allowed in the past. However, he stated the guidelines are already in place in the Historic Districts and the moratorium would only result in higher costs for everyone. Mrs. Shannon Dawson, 527 North Swinton Avenue, was next to address the Board. She stated that prior to purchasing the property, she and her husband had checked with the City and they were told that the property was non-contributing. Mrs. Dawson said she agreed with Mr. Dwyer that the review process for the Historic Districts was already in place because she and her husband had been going through a long process in trying to get everything approved so that they could begin building on their property. Now, if the moratorium is passed, they might be prohibited from doing so despite all their efforts to follow the guidelines that were in place. She further said she agreed with Commissioner Levinson's opinion that you don't need to have a moratorium in order to revise guidelines. Mr. Mike Simon, 314 N.W. 16th Street, stated he had been a resident of Delray for forty- one (41) years. He said he agreed with what the other residents had said and that the idea for a moratorium seems to be a clear reaction to the political environment. He further stated that, having been on the Historic Preservation Board, he agreed that the mechanisms are already in place. He said that people had begun processes under the guidelines of the LDRs and the direction of the Board. He agreed that a moratorium on demolitions in the Historic Districts was a good idea but stated it was not fair to penalize people who had already begun permitting processes under the guidelines in place at that time. He said the moratorium seemed to be a "knee-jerk reaction" and that it would significantly affect people's lives, their properties and their right to develop those properties under the guidelines that were in place when they purchased those properties. He said people had gone to the City to confirm what the process was in order to build in the Historic District and that to just stop them in the middle of this process was basically taking away their rights by them not being aware this moratorium was coming. Mr. Andy Spengler then addressed the Board and advised that he was to be one of the presenters at the meeting. He said that he was opposed to the moratorium and that, in response to what Mr. Simon had stated, if he had been in the market to purchase property in Delray Beach and knew that this moratorium was in the pipeline, he definitely would not have done so. Mr. Spengler said that he would be presenting a project for the third time at this meeting, one that had been processed using guidelines that had been in place for several years. He stated that they had previously obtained approval on his project for re-platting and for demolition and if this moratorium was approved he was sure it would last longer than six months. This would result in financial risks and losses and he did not know how he would handle them as a small builder. He said he is adamantly opposed to this. Mr. Hayden Burrus, 10 NE 6th Street, addressed the Board and said that it was critical that the Board implement the moratorium. He said that there had been a lot of discussion about the "cons" but the "pros" needed to be brought up also. He stated the idea had been brought up by the City Manager who was very well informed and had 3 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes—March 15, 2006 been the City Manager for many years. He said it had been discussed and passed by the City Commission and that the Mayor had supported it, as well as the citizens of the Historic Districts and, according to the last elections, the citizens of Delray Beach support it. Mr. Burrus said that it was important that the Board support the citizens of the City, rather than the developers that build in the City. Ms. Claudia Willis, 160 Marine Way, stated she supported the moratorium and asked that the Board would also. She said there were obviously loopholes in the system as she had seen the Marina District disappear during the twenty plus years she had lived there. She said she hoped that the rules could be tightened during the six month time frame. Ms. Lois Brezinski, 110 NE 7th Street, advised she disagreed with what had been said earlier that people are not interested in approving small houses on small properties. She said her street has many small homes that have been restored and this is happening on many streets in the district. She pointed out that there was a lot on Swinton Avenue with a restored small historic home on either side on which it is being proposed to build a 4,500 square foot home which would tower above its surroundings and definitely not"fit" in this area. Ms. Brezinski said if the Board would approve such a structure, obviously the guidelines are not clear enough or are not being interpreted correctly. She said the residents in the Historic Districts are only asking for some breathing room for a short time so that the guidelines can be reviewed and are made clear enough so that the Board can easily interpret them so that the look and the rhythm of the area can be preserved. She further stated that this would not include a twenty thousand square foot project being approved to be built on the one-acre lot next to her. She said she therefore challenged anyone speaking at this meeting who said everything is in place to drive up and down the streets in the Del-Ida District and they will see otherwise. Ms. Livia Landry, 701 North Swinton Avenue, said she lives in a fifteen hundred square foot historic home with other similar homes in this are. She then advised the Board that at its last meeting they had approved a forty-two hundred seventy five square foot house to be built next to her. She said that this house will tower over the homes in the area, including hers. She said she has read the historic guidelines and the LDRs and believed these indicate that this project should have been denied. She said she is not usually an advocate of moratoriums but believes one is called for given the current situation in Delray Beach. She understood and hoped that the guidelines would not change, they will just be made more specific so they will be more easily interpreted. She said she thought the Board will then be able to make better recommendations and decisions. Ms. Landry stated she is in favor of the moratorium although she hoped there was some way those who were already in the process of beginning their project could be accommodated. She said she felt this was a good first step and she hoped the Board would vote in favor of it. Ms. Liz Bold, 1104 Nassau Street, addressed the Board and stated she was against the moratorium. She said she moved to Nassau Street approximately ten years ago and had been before the Historic Preservation Board several times. She said she felt the guidelines in place were quite specific regarding restorations or additions. She said she thought it was a scary idea that nothing could be done in the Historic District for a six month period. 4 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes—March 15, 2006 Ms. Aleida Riley, 65 Palm Square, in the Marina District said she is a long time resident of Delray and she thought the moratorium was the greatest thing that could have happened. There being no additional persons wishing to speak, Chairman Perez closed the Public Comments. Board Comments Ms. Maura Dersh asked if the moratorium affected all projects that are in process. Mr. Shutt, Assistant City Attorney, replied that any application that had been approved prior to March 6, 2006 will still continue on in the process but anything submitted after March 6th would be affected by the moratorium. Ms. Reich asked if changes would be made to the LDRs as a result of this moratorium. Chairman Perez discussed how the LDRs are constantly changed and pointed out that, contrary to what had been stated in this meeting, several changes had been made over the years, such as how there could no longer be three-story townhomes that were built "straight up". He said the LDRs now require that the third floor be recessed back and other restrictions on massing. There was further discussion about the retroactive date of the moratorium, March 6th and Chairman Perez stated he did not think it was fair, that there should have been possibly a thirty day notice of this action so applicants could finalize and submit plans in progress. He did point out that the moratorium excluded structures under two-thousand square feet and additions that were less than fifty per cent (50%) of the original structure. Ms. Dersh stated that she thought the moratorium was a good idea, that there was enough property in Delray Beach that if someone wanted to build a large home, it did not have to be built in the Historic District. (Applause). Ms. Dersh also questioned the March 6th date and asked Mr. Shutt to clarify again what the actual "start date" of the moratorium would be. He replied that if the Board did not agree with the retroactive date, they could recommend denial of the Ordinance to the Commission with the direction that the Board would have approved it if the date the moratorium was to begin had been changed to a future, rather than retroactive, date. Ms. Peart said she was opposed to changing the date as she thought the idea needed to be implemented as quickly as possible. (Applause). Ms. Schatz said she was in favor of the Ordinance because the Board had struggled in the past with trying to interpret the guidelines. She said she thought the biggest issue to be dealt with was the size of new houses. She further stated she really had a problem with the fact that the penalty for breaking the rules of the Ordinance could result in jail time and that, if instead, there was going to be a fine, it needed to be a significant fine, not just $500. She said she also was opposed to the retroactive date. She summarized by saying she thought the concept was very good but she had a problem with the way parts of the Ordinance were worded. After further discussion, Ms. Dersh said she thought they should take a vote. Mr. Shutt directed the Board as to how the motion should be made, with any direction they wanted to make to staff to be made after the vote. 5 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes—March 15, 2006 Motion/Findings: It was moved by Ms. Dersh, seconded by Ms. Peart and denied with a 4 to 1 vote (Ms. Peart, Ms Schatz, and Ms. Dersh dissenting, Ms. Lake and Mr. Miller absent) for approval of the moratorium ordinance to the Planning and Zoning Board establishing a six-month moratorium on any new development proposals included, but not limited to, demolitions, new constructions, and additions for all five (5) of the City's historic districts and recommended that the effective date of the moratorium coincide with second reading of the enacting ordinance (not March 6, 2006) and felt that the penalties contained in the ordinance were extreme. Direction to Staff Chairman Perez led the discussion by saying that he did not think the moratorium should be retroactive to March 6th; that he thought the citizens should be given more notice. Mr. Shutt asked if an effective date of April 18th, the date of the second reading before the Commission was agreeable or was the Board looking for an effective date further out. Ms. Peart again stated the thought the March 6th date should be left as is, but Mr. Perez, Ms. Dersh and Ms. Reich were in agreement that it should be made effective as of April 18th Mr. Shutt asked if the Board had any further direction to staff. Ms. Schatz again stated she thought the possible jail term penalty was too harsh and she thought instead there should be a meaningful fine. Mr. Shutt pointed out that jail time was the maximum penalty. Chairman Perez suggested that there be a clause that the moratorium could not be extended. Mr. Shutt replied that this could not be done as they could not bind a future Commission action. At 7:20 the Board took a short break and Ms. Schatz left the meeting. IV. Certificates of Appropriateness The meeting resumed at 7:26 and Chairman Perez read the Quasi-Judicial Rules. A. North Del Ida Estates Lot 2 — 116 NE 7th Street, (Formerly 106 NE 7th Street), Del-Ida Park Historic District, Andrew Spengler, Owner. Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex parte communications regarding this item. He stated he had spoken with the applicant twice regarding procedural items. Ms. Alvarez then advised the Board that the applicant had requested that this item be tabled. It was moved by Ms. Dersh, seconded by Ms. Reich and approved 4 to 0 (Ms. Schatz, Ms. Lake and Mr. Miller absent) to table this item. B. North Del Ida Estates Lot 1 — 112 NE 7th Street (Formerly NE 7th Street), Del-Ida Park, Andrew Spengler, Owner. Chairman Perez asked if there was any ex parte communication on this item. He stated that he had spoken with the applicant on this item. 6 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes—March 15, 2006 Ms. Alvarez advised the Board that this item was for approval of a COA for the construction of a new single-family residence at the address shown above. She said the property previously contained a Contributing one-story, single-family dwelling and detached, single-car garage. During its meeting of August 3, 2005, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) reviewed and recommended approval for the demolition of the existing structures based on the fact that they appeared to have very little architectural or historical merit. Ms. Alvarez stated this lot was previously a part of six (6) non-conforming lots which have since been reconfigured and replatted into four (4) conforming lots. She said, at the HPB meeting of June 15, 2005, it was stressed that the layout and design of the four (4) proposed single family homes `....will be required to meet strict historic preservation design guidelines to ensure compatibility with respect to design and massing in relation to the surrounding area.' Ms. Alvarez then detailed more of the staff report and said the applicant had now submitted revised plans and is now before the Board for the second time for the construction of a two-story, single family residence at 112 NE 7th Street. She described in detail the elevations and the measurements of the structures. Ms. Alvarez advised the Board that the plans submitted did not meet the LDRs or the Historic Preservation Guidelines or the requirements quoted above from the June 15, 2005 HPB meeting. She said that the applicant has submitted three proposals for review, none of which have met the aforementioned requirements. Ms. Alvarez said, based upon the analysis in the Staff Report, positive findings could not be made and staff recommends denial. Applicant's Presentation Mr. Andy Spengler, owner of the property, then addressed the Board. He said that when Ms. Alvarez was making her presentation, she kept referring to the streetscape and what was consistent with the neighborhood. He said that the Board's example of appropriate in-fill construction in Del-Ida was for a two-story structure. Mr. Spengler said that he had been working on this project for over a year and a half and that, during that time, he had dealt with three different historic planners. He said when he took the projects to the Board previously they had indicated that they would prefer that the proposed structures be consistent with the zoning district, not necessarily with what is in the historic district. He said he had met the setback requirements for this zoning district which was R-1-AA. Mr. Spengler said that if the restrictions on lot sizes had been changed to allow for larger lots, it would only follow that larger structures would be built on those lots. Mr. Spengler advised the Board that he had done a survey of the homes on NE 7th Street and that less than 50% would be considered historic in nature. He said he thought what he was proposing would add merit to the area and that fifty years from now, when people looked at the homes he hoped to build that they would think they wanted them to be preserved, based upon their architectural value. Ms. Spengler said that when he came before the Board in December 2005 they had indicated that they thought the plans he presented were very beautiful in architectural value. He said the buzzword at that time was that square footage was not an issue, however massing was a concern. At the suggestion of the Board, he said he had made changes to reduce the pitch of the roof, remove the dormer, make the first floor and second floor shutters consistent, added hardiplank to both the first and second floor and basically added a wrap-around porch to help break up the first and second floor dimensions. Mr. Spengler said that they had addressed all of the comments and that he thought they would go through an easy approval process at the January meeting. He 7 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes—March 15, 2006 said that square footage had never been brought up, that massing on the second floor was the issue but that the project was still denied. Mr. Spengler then stated that the architectural style of project brought before the Board at this meeting had been changed as they were trying to address concerns that kept coming up. He said that the second floor area was now forty-foot wide, twenty foot narrower than previously submitted. He said the garage is set back twenty-seven feet from the front plane of the house, as requested by Ms. Alvarez. Mr. Spengler stated that the architectural style of the house was now "Mission" and that it should fit very well in the historic district. He said he thought it would be consistent with the Del-Ida area. He talked about two other homes in the area that had required Variances in order to be built and made comparisons between those two and his proposal and pointed out that they were not required to request a Variance for this house. Mr. Spengler said that he did not think this house could be called a "mansion", that it was up to the architect to minimize the look of the exterior while creating as much square footage under roof as possible. He then listed all of the items that had been of concern and said he felt all of them had been addressed. He said he was bringing this project in for the third time and believed it was sensitive to what the community and the Board wanted and hoped that it would be approved. Public Comments Mr. Rob Mannweiler, 109 NE 7th Street, addressed the Board and stated his concern over the size of the house Mr. Spengler had proposed. He said all four of the houses he was planning to build would be the largest in the neighborhood and he did not think they were consistent with the neighborhood. Mr. John Hackett, 10 NE 10th Street, said that Mr. Spengler had built a house that was close to his home and it was the nicest one in the area. He pointed out that the house presently before the Board would be built on a lot much larger than others in the adjacent area and, therefore, it seemed logical that the structure could be larger and still be consistent. He said he thought it was a great project and he supported it. Mr. Peter Dwyer, 711 Seagate Drive, stated he had known Mr. Spengler for a long time and thought he does a very good job in what he does. He said he thought Mr. Spengler had addressed all concerns and, although the house he planned to build was larger than those in the area, the lot was also much larger. Mr. Dwyer said the house was good looking, it had some elements that went back to the 1920's, it has some architectural features that could be found in Banker's Row and it would look much nicer than a lot of structures within the historic district. He stated he strongly supported this project and wished that the City would get rid of a lot of the "junk" that is in the district. Ms. Livia Landry, 701 North Swinton Avenue, advised she disagreed with Mr. Spengler's belief that this is an in-fill house, as there had been a home on this lot. She said his proposal was for a beautiful home but the way it was presented, it looked like it was on a much larger lot. Ms. Landry stated Mr. Spengler builds beautiful homes but she did not believe this one was compatible in this district. She said because this would eventually be four very large houses on four adjacent lots, it would really be incompatible with the area. Ms. Janine Shuman, 116 NE 6th Street, stated she thought the house was absolutely stunning but pointed out again that it was usually a certain type of person that moved into the historic district. She said she and her husband had looked in the historic district because they liked the charm and the quaintness. She said although the house is beautiful she was concerned about the type of person who would purchase such a home and whether they would care about the community the way they did and whether the quaintness and charm would be gone. 8 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes—March 15, 2006 Mr. Scott Porten, 112 Basin Drive, said it should be remembered what was on the lots previously, that there were dilapidated houses which had been demolished. He said, regarding the previous person's comments, you could not get into the mind set of the person who would be purchasing the house. He said that Mr. Spengler had been through a lot in trying to meet the direction given by the Board and said he supported this project. Mr. Hayden Burrus, 10 NE 6th Street, then addressed the Board and stated there were numerous very large homes being proposed in the area, four of which are to be built by Mr. Spengler. He said the neighboring very small house on 6th Street was up for sale and it was his opinion that there would be one after another that would be put up for sale and that was not historic preservation, it was historic destruction. Mr. Burrus also said he did not agree that Mr. Spengler had tried to accommodate the wishes of the Board, that he had reduced the size of the homes by a very small margin. He said there were no homes on 6th Street that were two-story and none over twenty-five hundred (2,500) square feet and the house Mr. Spengler was proposing was totally out of scale with the immediate neighborhood. He said the Board was in place to support the residents, not the developers and the residents clearly did not want these houses built in their neighborhood. He hoped the Board would reject the entire project. Mr. Scott Richman, 802 North Swinton, said that he thought there was a lot of public out crying because of the number of massive townhouses being built. But he said that, in this case, Mr. Spengler had followed by the direction of the Board and he thought he had done a very good job. He said the former house that was there was blight and this would be a tremendous improvement. He stated change is inevitable and things cannot remain stagnant forever. Mr. Richman closed by saying he felt Mr. Spengler had followed the guidelines and that he supported this project and hoped the Board would approve it. Mr. Mike Simon, 314 NW 16th Street, addressed the Board and said that these three projects are outstanding in design and that the house being discussed was proportionate to the lot. He said, based upon the figures presented, there would still be approximately one-half of open space left on the lot after the house was built. He stated he was in total support of the projects. Ms. Claudia Willis, Marine Way, stated these definitely were fine homes but they could be built in other areas of the City. She said the historic districts were all about preservation and about historic homes in historic areas. She stated that (possibly a prior) Board had allowed large homes to be built on 7th Avenue and that if these houses were approved, it would be the start of many more large homes being built and it would be the beginning of the end of this historic district. (Applause) Ms. Patrice Fitzgerald, 1610 NW 2nd Avenue, stated that when Mr. Spengler got approval for his other two houses as historic homes but they were part of the Village of Delray. She said these showcase houses brought attention not only to the Del-Ida district, but to the Village of Delray. She said the scale of this house was fine and not everyone wanted to live in a twelve-hundred square foot house. She further stated that people have families and need larger houses and that this town was supposed to support families and community. Ms. Fitzgerald said she supports this project as she has seen the Del-Ida area progress in the last couple of years and she thinks it will be a very good addition to this area. (Applause). Ms. Toni DelFiandra, 14 Dixie Boulevard, addressed the Board and told them she liked the project that he put on Seacrest before. However, she was concerned with how the neighbors feel. The homeowners in that area purchased extra large lots in order to have space around their homes. 9 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes—March 15,2006 Ms. Lois Brezinski, 110 NE 7`" Street, stated the house Mr. Spengler proposed to build would be next door to her home. She said she liked the design and she thought they were finally seeing what had been envisioned for the historic area. She said she thought Mr. Spengler was now sensitive to the architecture and the antiquity of the area. Ms. Brezinski then stated that Mr. Spengler had not returned calls from her or from others interested in this project and that he had not cleaned up the lot or trimmed the hedges and you cannot walk on the sidewalk around it. She said he had not reached out to the community and if he had met with the neighbors, as another applicant had done, he would have generated a lot more good will. She stated she did not have a problem with having one of his houses on one of the lots but would not be happy with four houses of this size on four lots as it would destroy the feel and the look of the neighborhood. Ms. Shannon Dawson, 527 North Swinton, said that part of the beauty of Delray is the charm and the quaintness but, also, how eclectic it is. She said there are so many different architectural styles that contrast each other and so many different sized homes as well. She said she felt this beautiful two-story home would add to the area. She said Mr. Spengler had done a beautiful job on this house and had proven himself in the past in Delray and she felt the project should be given a chance. Ms. Valerie Brinks, 906 SW 27th Avenue in Boynton Beach, asked if she could address the Board, although she was not a citizen of Delray Beach. She was told she could and explained that she sold real estate in this area and that Del-Ida was a "hot" area to be in. She explained this was because people liked the small individual houses as they liked the character of the houses. She said she had people requesting terrazzo floors because they wanted the old Florida charm and they wanted yards with grass. She said if they wanted large homes like Mr. Spengler is proposing, they would go to Boca or Palm Beach Gardens or go out west. Ms. Brinks said when she first saw the houses being built by Mr. Spengler, she thought "oh no, here it comes" (that the McMansions were coming). She said she was afraid that these large houses would change the flavor of the neighborhood. As no one else wished to speak, Chairman Perez closed the Public Comments. Staff's Cross Examination Ms. Alvarez asked for clarification as to whether the proposal that was presented at this meeting was for lot number one or two. Applicant's Cross Examination Mr. Spengler discussed the issue of square footage, in response to one of the speaker's calculations. He also said that by going "vertical" and building a two-story house, he was leaving more open space and that that would be what would help minimize the overall look. He stated he also wanted to reiterate that on 7th Street, there are eleven (11) out of sixteen (16) lots that are fifty foot (50') wide and those homes are typically thirty-foot (30') wide. He said if he put a thirty-foot (30') wide house on his lots, one of which was eighty-two foot (82') and another that was ninety-five foot (95') wide, it would be totally out of balance. He also pointed out again that they had more than met the required setbacks and had not requested any Variances. He said he had tried to incorporate features such as those used by Mizner in the 1920's and had tried to keep the design in balance with other buildings in the area. He also said this type of house would probably be purchased by someone with a family who wants to live in Delray and in the historic district and that was who he was trying to market to. (Applause) 10 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes—March 15, 2006 Board Discussion Ms. Peart said that the reason they were asking for a moratorium was because they needed more specifics regarding square footage, but that there are rules currently in place that state that what is build in the historic district must be compatible in size, mass, scale, and height with what is already there, and also with the rhythm of what is already on the street. She said she hoped that Mr. Spengler would meet with the neighbors and try to come up with something more compatible and possibly consider a smaller two- story house with a one-story next to it so that it would "graduate" into the street. She said, as presented, she would have to vote for denial. Ms. Reich said Mr. Spengler had made a valid attempt and the design was beautiful, but that it still looked so large and it was not in proportion with the community. She stated we need to preserve this area and she would have to vote to deny this project. Ms. Dersh stated she thought that a larger home should be allowed to be built on this larger lot, but that she still had a problem with the massing of this house. She further stated she did not like the east elevation because it was a long, massive wall. She said she also had a problem with the roof, that a "Mission" style house did not have all of the barrel tile as was shown on the rendering. She said she wasn't sure how she would vote. Chairman Perez said he agreed with Ms. Willis regarding the Marina District in that it no longer appeared to be a historic district because house after house was built on the intra-coastal and Board after Board approved the new houses because the guidelines were not clear. He said that was the reason for the moratorium. He said, however, he was struggling with how to vote because he knew the applicant had been through a long process and he had reduced the size considerably from what he originally brought in. Chairman Perez stated that the floor area ratio on the 2,200 square foot house on the street that had been referred to several times to was 36% and the applicant's ratio would be 41%. He said it was a really difficult decision before the Board. The Board then discussed whether they were going to actually vote to approve or deny or whether they should just give the applicant further direction. Mr. Shutt interjected and asked the applicant whether he would prefer an actual vote or further direction from the Board. Ms. Spengler replied that since he might fall under the moratorium if the Board voted for denial and he had to resubmit, he would ask that they give him direction at this time. After further lengthy discussion about the size and massing of the house and about the roof, the Board decided to vote on this item. Motion/Findings It was moved by Maura Dersh, seconded by Joanne Peart and approved 4 to 0 (Ms. Lake, Mr. Miller, and Ms. Schatz absent) to continue with direction the Certificate of Appropriateness for 112 NE 7th Street, Del-Ida Historic District, based upon the following items: 1) Break up the east elevation; 2) Reduce the square footage to make it more compatible with the street; and 3) Modify the roof line to reduce massing. C. North Del Ida Estates Lot 4 - 111 NE 6th Street (Formerly 106 NE 7th Street), Del-Ida Park Historic District, Andrew Spengler, Owner. Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex parte communications on this item. He said he had spoken with Mr. Spengler on this item also. 11 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes—March 15, 2006 Ms. Alvarez advised the Board that the item before them is consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of a new two-story residence and landscape plan located at 111 NE 6th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District. Ms. Alvarez said that,just as the prior project, the property, located in the Del-Ida Park Historic District, previously contained a contributing one-story, single-family dwelling and detached, single-car garage. During its meeting of August 3, 2005, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) reviewed and recommended approval for the demolition of the existing structures based on the fact that they appeared to have very little architectural or historical merit. Ms. Alvarez advised the Board that this property was previously a part of six (6) non- conforming lots which have since been reconfigured and replatted into four (4) conforming lots. The subject lot measures at a width of eighty-two feet (82') and a depth of one-hundred twenty feet (120'). The Staff report for the replat, which was reviewed at the HPB meeting of June 15, 2005, stressed that the layout and design of the four (4) proposed single family homes '....will be required to meet strict historic preservation design guidelines to ensure compatibility with respect to design and massing in relation to the surrounding area.' Ms. Alvarez pointed out that this is the first time this project has come before the Board. The project consists of the construction of a two-story, single-family residence containing 5,452 total square feet, approximately 4,242 square feet of which is under a/c and the building foot print calculates to approximately thirty-four percent (34%) of the property. She said the design takes a combined inspiration from Resort Colonial Revival, Plantation and Bahamian architectural styles. Ms. Alvarez went on to describe the project in further detail and then reviewed her design analysis for the Board, concluding that the current submittal does not meet the intentions of the components used to review for compatibility, appropriateness and compliance. Therefore, based on the analysis above and throughout the staff report, positive findings cannot be made with respect to the Comprehensive Plan, LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Applicant's Presentation Mr. Andy Spengler, owner of the property, then addressed the Board. He stated that this is the first time the Board is seeing this proposal but that they had tried to use a lot of the comments from the previous submittals to create what would be appropriate for this lot. He said it was another two-story house with many Key West elements including a low pitched metal roof. He described how the garage was set back as far as it could go on the lot and that it would be barely visible from the street. He pointed out the setbacks for the house and said they had setback the second story even further (almost fifty-one feet) to minimize the impact that the second story would have on the streetscape. Mr. Spengler stated this was a very simple, basic design with a lot of architectural features. He said the pool would not be visible from the street and again mentioned how far the house was setback. Public Comments Mr. Hayden Burrus, 10 NE 6th Street, addressed the Board said he wanted to address some specifics regarding the proposal Mr. Spengler had just submitted. He said the 12 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes—March 15, 2006 drawing was very deceptive as there are no others homes in the drawing but it was obvious that he was trying to build four two-story houses in this area with square footage in excess of four thousand square feet (4,000 sq. ft.). He further stated that this drawing did not depict what this block looks like and urged the Board to disregard it as representative of what the area will look like. Mr. Burrus said much had been said about what a hardship it was for Mr. Spengler to have to come back before the Board repeatedly with his projects but pointed out that it was a hardship for the neighbors and citizens to have to come to the meetings over and over and state the same thing over and over—that the houses are too big. He said if he reduced it by fifty square feet (50 sq. ft.) each time and came back in twenty-five (25) more times, it's still too big each time. He also said it was Mr. Spengler's job to come before this Board to get approval but that the neighbors that have to keep coming in to fight the project have their own jobs and that they should not have to keep coming in to fight these projects. He further stated they should not have to fight to preserve their historic neighborhoods and sacrifice time out of their lives while it is part of Mr. Spengler's life. Mr. Burrus further said that it was apparent that the majority of the neighbors were opposed to these projects. He said maybe some of the other developers, or neighbor/developers or friends of Mr. Spengler may have spoken in favor of these projects but the immediate neighborhood was overwhelmingly against it. He said that he would ask that the Board consider what the residents want, as they are the ones the Board represents, not the developers. Ms. Toni Del Fiandra, 14 Dixie Boulevard, then addressed the Board and said that the house just west of the one proposed is approximately one-thousand square feet (1,000 sq. ft.), is a contributing structure and is on multiple lots. She said there is another small house on the adjoining lot. She said there is a ranch-style house across the street that has been for sale multiple times and she had wondered many times when someone might purchase it then the lost next door, demo the existing structure, join the two lots and build another very large house. Next Ms. Lois Brezinski, 110 NE 7th Street, addressed the Board and said she had moved into the historic district assuming all who lived or built there would have to adhere to certain guidelines. She said the guidelines refer to design and massing in relation to the surrounding area and that the Board had to know that the proposed house was not relative to the other homes in the area. She further stated that it was obvious the neighbors want small homes, that if someone wanted to build large homes they should go to other areas of the City. Ms. Brezinski said the residents of the historic districts love their little homes, their little yards and way of life and they want to preserve it. Ms. Livia Landry, 701 North Swinton Avenue, said she agreed with Ms. Brezinski regarding what the residents want. She further stated she thought the guidelines had enough information that decisions could be made about the design of these type projects. She said she is concerned about the value of her contributing home as she thought the value of her home would decrease if these projects are allowed to move forward. Ms. Landry said that they bought this house because it was protected and asked when someone was going to defend the value of her home. She said she thought the proposed houses were beautiful and would be fine on an acre lot, but to have four of them right together is too much. She also asked that Mr. Spengler meet with the neighbors to discuss the proposals. 13 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes—March 15, 2006 Mr. Rob Mannweiler, 109 NE 7th Street, stated that Mr. Spengler builds beautiful houses, but that these are just too large for this neighborhood. He asked that Mr. Spengler compromise on the size. He said the average size of the house in Del-Ida is seventeen hundred square feet (1,700 sq. ft.) and this project is just too large for this area. As there was no one else who wished to speak, Chairman Perez closed the Public Comments. Staff Rebuttal Ms. Alvarez stated that if the Board was to vote in favor of continuing with direction on this project, she wanted to make sure that all of the conditions in the staff report would be dealt with, as well as any others the Board might add. She also pointed out that, as per the part of the LDRs that were being used as guidelines, this project has no visual compatibility in the historic district. Applicant Rebuttal Mr. Andy Spengler then reminded the Board that when he looked at this property initially it was six (6) fifty-foot (50 ft.) lots, as was much of the neighborhood. He pointed out that there were six (6) out of sixteen (16) homes that had been designated as historic and would, therefore, be protected and not demolished to make way for "McMansions". He said they had tried to deal with the concerns that had been raised and he still thought the architectural elements would be something that would be appreciated fifty years from now. Board Discussion Ms. Peart pointed out that there were three (3)two-story homes on 7th Street but not one two-story house on 6th Street. Ms. Reich said the proposed house had a wonderful design by a great architect but, in two words, it is "too big". After some further discussion it was decided a vote should be taken on this proposal. Motion/Findings It was moved by Ms. Peart, seconded by Mr. Dersh and approved with a 4 to 0 vote to continue the Certificate of Appropriateness for 111 NE 6th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District with direction, based upon a failure to make findings with respect to the Comprehensive Plan, LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, with suggestions one through eleven (1-11) as listed in the Staff Report, and address staff's recommendations as contained in the Staff Report.. IV. Reports and Comments Public Comments Ms. Livia Landry, 701 North Swinton Avenue, stated she wanted to speak about lot five. She said the lots may be fifty feet (50 ft.) but many of the homes, contributing and 14 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes—March 15, 2006 otherwise, are on multiple lots. She said many people had purchased adjacent lots so they would have more space. Mr. Hayden Burrus, 10 NE 6th Street, stated he thought the Board heard at this meeting how passionate the residents are about this issue. He said that they are more tired of coming to these meetings than the developers are. He again stated they are just trying to make a profit. He then thanked the developers for bringing in these projects because, in doing so, they had united the community and the group "Save Delray" had been born. Mr. Burrus again told the Board that they represent the residents, not the property owners or developers. He said the residents will increase in their aggressiveness of support of their concerns. He said they were pleased that the Board had not approved any of the projects, but they had not denied them either. Ms. Patrice Fitzgerald, 1610 NW 2nd Avenue, stated that Mr. Spengler is not just a developer, he is a resident of the community. His children go to school in Delray, he lives in this area (although not in Del-Ida) and he is passionate about what he does. She said he was bringing beautiful homes before the Board because he cares. She said that in today's market, it did not make sense to purchase a plot of land and build or live in a two-thousand square foot home. She stated that if he was doing new construction with historic elements to it, it was because he was targeting the type of buyer who would care about the historic features and area. She closed by saying again that Mr. Spengler had proved that he is not just any developer, that he is a caring member of the community. Board Comments One of the Board members commented that she had visited Mr. Spengler's design showcase houses and they were beautiful. They said they all agree they are well done, they just have a problem with the scale. Ms. Pearl said that someone had asked her if the Del-Ida group had a meeting with the City about the guidelines stating they were from another district and they wanted to be invited to that meeting. She said if a meeting was held prior to ending the moratorium the representatives from the other districts wanted to attend. Staff Comments Ms. Alvarez advised the Board there would be an appeal to the COA for 711 North Swinton Avenue that was approved at the March 1, 2006 meeting. She said there are actually two separate appeals and they will be heard at the April 4, 2006 City Commission meeting. Adjournment There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 10:20 p.m. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for March 15, 2006 and was formally adopted and approved by the Board on Denise A. Valek Executive Assistant/Board Liaison If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. 15 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH REGULAR MEETING MEETING DATE: January 3, 2007 LOCATION: City Commission Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Keith Snider, Roger Cope, John Miller, Kim French, Linda Lake, Toni DelFiandra, JoAnn Peart MEMBERS ABSENT: Jeannette Dobson STAFF PRESENT: Amy Alvarez, Denise Valek, and Terrill Barton I. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman John Miller called the meeting to order at 6:00p.m. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. Chairman Miller read the City of Delray Beach's procedures for Quasi-Judicial Hearing for all the items on the Agenda. II. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATNESS A. 711 North Swinton Avenue,Del-Ida Park Historic District — David Rosenbom, Owner; Harold Tuttle, Authorized Agent. There was no Ex Parte Communication. Motion/Findings It was moved by Ms. Lake and seconded by Ms. French to reconsider the application for a Certificate of Appropriateness at 711 North Swinton Avenue, Del-Ida Park Historic District. Said motion was passed with a vote of 5 to 1 (Ms. Peart abstained). Ms. Amy Alvarez, Historic Preservation Planner entered the file into the record and presented the proposal for a reconsideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with a partial demolition and major additions and alterations to a non- contributing structure at 711 North Swinton Avenue, Del-Ida Park Historic District as stated in the Staff Report. Staff recommends continuation with direction. I Historic Preservation Board Minutes—January 3, 2007 Applicant Presentation Mr. Tuttle, representing the applicant, stated the owners are out of town. She stated the owners want to live in Delray and comply with the guidelines within the district. She stated she thought the owner was an asset to the City of Delray Beach. Public Comments Ms. Shannon Dawson, 527 North Swinton, stated that the applicant, after difficulty with the approval process, put it in the hands of staff hoping to have approval. She added that the owner tried unsuccessfully to accommodate the City as more changes are still required. Rebuttal Ms. Alvarez stated that she redesigned the project with the applicant, however when the final plans came in, much was lost in translation with the architect. Ms. Alvarez continued that Staff is trying to work with the applicant. Board Discussion The Board's comments are summarized below: • That some of the items listed have not been addressed as stated in the Staff Report; • That the Board is just as frustrated as the applicant in trying to move the process forward; ■ That the architect had only met with Staff during the initial stages; • That the representative for the applicant does not know why the architect could not appear this evening; • That the Board may been seen as not being effective; • That Ms. Pyburn asked the Board to stay with the relevance of tonight's issues; • That the project is already being expedited; • That it is unclear what items have been addressed and what items still need to be addressed; • That the Board is in favor of Staffs recommendations; • That in spite of the changes, most of the items have been addressed; • That Staff stated the roof shapes can be adjusted on both the North and South sides to eliminate the flat roof; • That Staff stated "baby steps" are being taken to reduce the second story by 25%, but there is improvement; ■ That the front porch overhang does not cover all the shutters; • That a fireplace no longer exists in the house; • That the house has a large amount of design flaws; • That the architect is making the decisions for the Board difficult and ultimately, it is the owner that is responsible; • That if the Board approves this item, Staff will deal with the details in making sure the project is correct; • That the Board should add a condition stating until all conditions are met, the Board should not review this item again; • That so many changes have been made to the initial plan, but it is difficult to see what has been changed; • That the architect's design has been inconsistent; 2 Historic Preservation Board Minutes—January 3, 2007 • That there are some small issues with the front that look awkward, but the technical items have to be addressed; • That the applicant has been caught in between the architect's error; • That the main issue is that the second floor elevation should be broken up; • That the South elevation is not an issue although the drawings are difficult to understand and that the house sits well; • That Staff stated removal of the flat roof is a more appropriate design; • That the French doors can be an option; It was moved by Ms. Lake, seconded by Ms. Peart, and approved 6 to 0 (Ms. Dobson absent) to Continue the Certificate of Appropriateness for 711 North Swinton Avenue, Del-Ida Park Historic District, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E) (4), (E) (7) and 4.5.1(E) (8) (a-k), the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation with the following direction: 1. That a roof plan is submitted; 2. That all elevation heights are consistent with respect to measured height on all elevations; 3. That the porches are consistent with respect to dimensions on all plans and elevations; 4. That a single French door is provided on the west elevation leading to the flat roof deck; 5. That all shutters are proportionate to the windows; 6. That the plans provide complete dimensions on the floor plans and elevations, and that a north arrow appropriately pointing to the north on the stair lines exist; 7. That all porch rails and posts are made of wood and noted as such on the final plans. 8. That all conditions be met prior to review by the Board; III. REPORTS AND COMMENTS Public Comments Ms. Dawson. 527 North Swinton Avenue, stated that David has been led on a "wild goose chase" and that Staff would help. She continued that the City Commission kept comparing his plans to the guidelines that have not been put into place yet. She added that if David was asked to bring his architect to the meetings, he would. She concluded that perhaps part of the application should be directing what the applicant should do. Ms. Dawson stated a simple remedy to this issue would be to have the Historic Board create a group of architects that would work in this area. He added that he didn't think the guidelines would be the answer. The Board's comments are summarized below: • That there was a question about whether all Board members are required to attend the seminar; • That it is not a requirement, but a suggestion by Paul; • That a question was asked of Ms. Pyburn as to whether there are legal ramifications of Staff recommendations of architects; 3 4 Historic Preservation Board Minutes—January 3, 2007 • That Ms. Pyburn stated that the City as a public body cannot recommend any one architect, but they can direct the applicant to local associations; • That Ms. Pyburn suggested word of mouth recommendations; • That the Historical Society could be called for reference on properties being worked on in the Historic area; • That the CRA may make presentations before amendments to the LDR are effected; • That the structure on AIA has a permit for interior renovation, but not for exterior; • That the parcel is part of the Historic District; • That renovation was approved for the Hartmann House on the corner of 3rd and 7th and will expire in March; • That there was surprise it was individually designated, approved, and certified and came before HPB; • That Staff Reports will be distributed to the Board to show the date and application for the Hartmann House; and • That Ms. Pyburn cautioned the Board to not share information about the project as it could come back before the Board. Staff comments For budgetary reasons, those wishing to attend the seminar should indicate so before tomorrow. IV. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 7:15p.m. The undersigned is the Acting Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for January 3, 2007 which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on If the Minutes you have received are not completed as indicated above then this means that these are not the official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. 4 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH REGULAR MEETING MEETING DATE: February 7, 2007 LOCATION: City Commission Chambers PRESENT: Keith Snider, Roger Cope, John Miller, Kim French, Linda Lake, Toni Del Fiandra, JoAnn Peart STAFF PRESENT: Amy Alvarez, Denise Valek, and Brian Shutt CALL TO ORDER: Chairman John Miller called the meeting to order at 6:00p.m. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. Chairman Miller read the City of Delray Beach's procedures for Quasi-Judicial Hearing for all the items on the Agenda. II. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATNESS A. 711 North Swinton Avenue, Del-Ida Park Historic District — David Rosenbom, Owner; Harold Tuttle, Authorized Agent. Ms. Alvarez entered the file into the record and presented the proposal for a Continuation of a COA request (2007-020-COA) associated with the partial demolition of and major additions and alterations to a non-contributing structure as stated in the Staff Report. Applicant Presentation Mr. David Rosenbom, owner, stated each time he comes before the Board, he has tried to listen to the comments and comply. He has tried his best to listen to the City, his neighbors, and the Board. He stated he has done his best to comply in the past fourteen (14) months. He added that he will have a landscape plan presented as soon as his footprint is fixed. He asked the Board to approve his project. Public Comments There were none. Board Discussion The Board's comments are summarized below: ■ That the door cannot be done as the flat roof comes up above the interior level; ■ That the suggestion to put the French door in was to make it look more like a usable space; ■ That you can bring a window down; ■ That the balcony can easily be made to look like a usable balcony; Historic Preservation Board Minutes— February 7, 2007 • That the architect was supposed to be present; • That there was empathy for the applicant and disgruntlement for the architect; • That the applicant responded to the Board stating his original project did have a balcony; • That there is disappointment in the professional opinion of someone who should know better and is incorrectly advising his client, refusing to be present; • That the applicant in spite of his architect not being present, did comply with the Board's commands; and • That the second staff comment is fine as it is. Motion: It was moved by Ms. Lake, seconded by Ms. French, and approved 5 to 1 (Mr. Cope dissented) to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for 711 North Swinton Avenue, Del-Ida Park Historic District, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(a-k), the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation with the condition that the landscape plan is approved prior to COA Certification. Mr. Cope suggested to Ms. Peart that she not vote as he does. Ms. Peart asked if she approved the project would she be sorry afterward. She was very concerned about the North Swinton area. Ms. Peart asked how far back the side yard is. Mr. Miller stated it is unclear how the project will look once completed. Mr. Shutt and Mr. Miller stated the vote should be determined by the facts and evidence presented to the case. Ms. Peart stated if it is far enough back on the property it will look satisfactory to her. Ms. Peart is willing to change her vote to approve the project. Mr. Miller stated Ms. Alvarez is asking the applicant for enough information to verify that the presentation is what will be offered in the plan. It was discussed that the Board can ask for more specifics if they deem necessary. Mr. Shutt stated the Board could vote to approve with certain conditions stated in the motion. Mr. Miller asked what type of measurements or distances would the Board like to see in the plan. Ms. Peart stated she was concerned with the view of it coming from the South. The Board asked how his neighbor felt about the plan. Mr. Rosenbom responded that the last plan his neighbor had seen (in November), was OK with her although she didn't care for the second story. Motion: It was moved by Ms. Lake and seconded by Ms. French and approved 5 to 1 (Mr. Cope opposed) to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for 711 North Swinton Avenue, Del-Ida Park Historic District, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(a-k), the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation with the condition that the landscape plan is approved prior to COA Certification. 2 Historic Preservation Board Minutes— February 7, 2007 III. REPORTS AND COMMENTS Public Comments Mr. Eric Wood, 1101 Nassau Street, stated he was grateful for the Board and thanked them for their service. He has lived at this address for sixty (60) years. Ms. Lois Brezinski, 110 NE 7th Street, wanted to know why the proposed house (submitted by the owner/architect) could not be shown in the context to the rest of the neighborhood. She continued that it is not that costly to provide a virtual rendition and would be an asset in trying and helping the Board to protect the Historic District. Reports from Historic District Representatives - none The Board's comments are summarized below: ■ That in the new LDR guidelines, it will address her comments and show surrounding streets; • That it would have saved time, money and angst in the long run for this applicant; • That the fliers for the walking tour of the Marina Historic district are available; ■ That the Historic Society Trolley Tour was interesting; ■ That it was difficult to view the need for improvements in the area of 4th in the West Settlers District; • The facade grant program has moved into a loan program as the pool of people for the grant has been exhausted; • That the purple house with blue shutters is being demolished; • That few people have used the grant program; • That Tuesday the 13th will be the meeting (workshop) in Chambers; ■ That the amendments will be before the Board on the 21st and the LDRs will be presented; • That Ms. Alvarez is in touch with the community contact person frequently; • That the case studies have been completed and will be presented; • That it is not an interactive workshop, but rather a presentation to the P & Z and HPB Boards (informational meeting); • That the vacant lot near the 4th Ave. burned out house has been purchased; • That along 5th Avenue (South) there are contributing structures that are not in the Historic District; • That there is a development application in, but not sure it is approved; • That there was some discussion about moving some of the structures; Staff Comments • That full attendance will be present at the 21st Board meeting; and • That it is uncertain whether all can attend the workshop meeting on the 13th. IV. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 7:00 p. m. 3 Historic Preservation Board Minutes— February 7, 2007 The undersigned is the Acting Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for February 7, 2007 which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on Denise A. Valek If the Minutes you have received are not completed as indicated above then this means that these are not the official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. 4 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH REGULAR MEETING MEETING DATE: May 2, 2007 LOCATION: City Commission Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Keith Snider, Roger Cope, JoAnn Peart, John Miller, Kim French, Linda Lake, Toni DelFiandra, STAFF PRESENT: Amy Alvarez, Denise Valek , and Terrill Barton I. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Miller called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. Chairman Miller read the City of Delray Beach's procedures for Quasi-Judicial Hearing for all the items on the Agenda. Change to the Agenda: Ms. Alvarez requested the Board if a discussion item for 114 NW 4th Avenue could be added to the Agenda. II. MINUTES It was moved by Mr. Cope seconded by Mr. Snider, and approved 7 to 0 to approve the Minutes meeting of April 18, 2007 as written. III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATNESS A. 110 NE 5th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District, Judie Mershimer, Property Owner. There were no Ex Parte Communication. Ms. Alvarez entered the file into the record and presented the proposal for a Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness (2007-141) for a screened enclosure and rear covered patio installed on a non-contributing structure and associated Variance Request to the parking requirements as stated in the Staff Report. Applicant Presentation Ms Mershimer stated that the roof has always been a tile roof and a shingle roof would be a step down. She added that there are trees all around her home and that it is an upgrade to her home. There was a question asked about the fence. The applicant replied that the fence has always been there. Public Comments Mr. Gomes, 105 NE 6th Street, stated that it would be a great improvement to the home, street and neighborhood. Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes May 2, 2007 Board Discussion The Board's comments are summarized below: • That the roof will be flush; • That the applicant is proposing S tiles and metal until it is redone; • That it is non-conforming and the Board has the power to let the applicant improve the property; and • That the color be yellow. By Separate Motions: Certificate of Appropriateness It was moved by Mr. Cope and seconded by Ms. Lake, and approved 7 to 0 to move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness (2007-141) for 110 NE 5th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in LDR Sections (E)(7), and (E)(8), and the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines subject to the following conditions: 1. That no existing details of the carport be altered or removed, and; 2. That the approved roof material for the rear covered porch be a standing seam metal roof with mil finish; 3. That the covered porch roof material be replicated upon replacement of the existing barrel tile or flat S tile roof material on the existing residence, and; 4. That any landscape requirements presented at the time of building permit application do not require further Board review. Variance It was moved by Ms. Lake and seconded by Mr. Cope, and approved 7 to 0 to move approval of the variance request for 110 NE 5th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in LDR Section 4.5.1(J)(1), to allow the two (2) required parking spaces to be located within the front setback provided that the driveway contains a width of at least sixteen feet (16'), but is no wider than eighteen feet (18'), and that the vehicles be parked side by side. B. 131 NW 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Joseph Marion, Property Owner. Ex Parte Communication: none Mr. Snider stated this was his neighbor and he asked him for his opinion. He stated he directed him toward Amy. This will not sway his opinion one way or the other. Ms. Amy Alvarez, Historic Preservation Planner entered the file into the record and presented the proposal for a consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the replacement of original windows on a contributing structure located at 131 NW 1st 2 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes May 2, 2007 Avenue, Old School Square Historic District as stated in the Staff Report subject to the conditions listed. Applicant Presentation Ms. Reichman, Weiner and Aronson, 102 North Swinton Avenue, comments are summarized below: • That all of the wood around the original window areas that remain, were changed out; ■ That the remaining ones have leakage coming in and are rotting; • That it is very important to her client to keep the look of the windows; • That the aluminum can be retro fit into the existing windows to fit the requested configurations by Staff; • That in addition, it would not compromise the look of the structure; • That if the installation were to accommodate impact glass, the process would compromise the structure and integrity more so, than retro fitting the aluminum into the existing original opening; and ■ That all conditions are accepted except for the aluminum clad wood. Board Discussion The comments are summarized below: • That Staff is recommending aluminum wood clad because the muntin profile is more distinct with the clad window as opposed to aluminum; • That the owner would like to keep the original as much as possible; • That the owner would match what is there now; • That the windows that are there now are not the original; • That the replacements be determined and match what the original installations were; • That the color will be white; • That the owner is willing to build the muntins as they exist now; • That the window would be 6/1; • That for it to be an all wood window, more would have to be rebuilt; • That Staff and the owner will determine what style it will be; and • That the Board cannot mandate the owner to replace what they do not know existed before; Motion Findings It was moved by Mr. Cope and seconded by Ms. Peart, and approved 7 to 0 to move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness (2007-153) for 131 NW 5th Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and (c) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to conditions: 1. That all original existing 6/1 windows maintain a 6/1 configuration; 2. That the four-light casement window in the kitchen contain a 2/2 configuration; 3. That the 4/4 casement windows located on the front (west) and side (north) elevations are replicated in type, configuration, and are aluminum clad and; 4. That all windows are aluminum impact resistant with a white finish; and 3 f Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes May 2, 2007 5. That any existing retrofitted aluminum windows be replaced in like and as close as possible and where possible the configuration should be worked out with Staff. C. 154-170 NW 5th Avenue, Spady Cultural Complex, West Settlers Historic District, EPOCH, There were no Ex Parte Communication. Ms. Alvarez entered the file into the record and presented the proposal for a Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for a Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements as stated in the Staff Report subject to the conditions as listed. Applicant Presentation Ms. Daisy Fulton, EPOCH Executive Director, comments are summarized below: • That the project has been before the Board before; • That the project has been in the plans since 2003/2004; and • The community has embraced the projects as well as the other Boards that support it. Public Comments Mr. Ralph Johnson, Professor of Architecture at FAU, stated he is supporting the project and students have been working on the project for years. He continued that the project would be an asset to the community. Board Discussion The Board's comments are summarized below: • That the elevator shaft has two (2) options; • That the applicant would like to take the least expensive option to effect completion of the project; • That the project is exciting and that it is a tremendous undertaking; • Question as to what the inspiration of the design is for the Amphitheatre; • That the applicant stated their design did not have any particular inspiration, but that he thought that the design was straight forward, yet elegant; and • That there might be concerns about sounds going into the neighborhood, but that a solution is evident. By Separate Motions Certificate of Appropriateness and Class IV Site Plan Modification It was moved by Ms. Lake, seconded by Mr. Cope, and approved 7 to 0 to move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class IV site plan modification, landscape plan, and design elements for Spady Cultural Complex located at 154-170 NW 5th Avenue, West Settlers Historic District by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in the Sections of the Land Development Regulations analyzed throughout the report, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation subject to the following conditions: 4 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes May 2, 2007 1. That materials of the handicap ramp and stairs at the Susan B. Williams house are noted on the floor plan; 2. That any replacement windows contain the same 4/1 configuration that exists, and are made of wood or are aluminum-clad wood, with the specifications noted on the plans; 3. That all replaced siding is replicated in its replacement; 4. That the stucco texture of the elevator shaft is noted on the elevations; 5. That the wall material of the amphitheater is noted on the elevations; 6. That the landscape review items noted in the report are addressed prior to certification; 7. That a five foot (5') right-of-way dedication along NW 5th Avenue is made prior to site plan certification; 8. That a three foot six inch (3'6") right-of-way dedication along the alley is made prior to site plan certification; 9. That an application for the proposed signage is submitted and contains additional information such as materials and colors; 10. That the ancillary structure is revised to either of the options noted below: a. That the elevator shaft is finished in hardiplank and contains either a hip or gable roof with a pitch no higher than 4/12. Waiver It was moved by Ms. Pearl, seconded by Ms. DelFiandra, and approved 7 to 0 to recommend approval to the City Commission for the waiver requests to LDR Section 4.4.13(F)(1)(a), which requires that the overall height of buildings shall be a minimum of twenty-five feet (25') in height, based on positive findings. IV. ACTION ITEMS A. Historic South Swinton Avenue and Sundy House, Old School Square Historic District; Dharma Properties, Property Owner; John Szerdi, Architect, Authorized Agent; Seaside City Development Group, LLC. There were no Ex Parte Communication. Ms. Alvarez stated she has provided a copy of the Treasure Coast's Regional Planning Council presentation and also an amendment to the report regarding parking. Ms. Alvarez, entered the file into the record and presented the proposal for a Consideration of approval of a Conceptual Master Development Plan for historic South Swinton Avenue and the Sundy House, located within the Old School Square Historic District as stated in the Staff Report subject to the conditions as listed. Applicant Presentation Mr. John Szerdi stated there will be a PowerPoint presentation. The applicant's comments are summarized below: • That this is the first Master Site Plan Development before the Board because of the aggregation of properties; • That Staffs report will show that the content of the presentation is consistent with the LDRs; 5 t Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes May 2, 2007 • That the reason Staff cannot say it is absolute is because it is a Master Plan; • That specific levels of details have been worked out with Staff (with consideration for the LDRs); • That in order to create the revitalized South Swinton Avenue and to relocate the structures as per the TCRPC suggested guidelines, that the economics of the existing re-adapted uses have not been viable; ■ That business would have suffered and it would not be worthwhile short term; • That the TCRPC guidelines have been followed closely; • That the water will be captured above the subterranean garage to prove the ex- filtration capacity; • That the expansion is broken up into three parcels; • That it will be a banquet facility and a spa with spa units; • That Sundy Lane will include adaptive reuse on Swinton; • The reconfigured alley will be a two story structure sitting on top of a raised crawl space allowing the expansion to occur; • That the Sundy Harvest phase which is currently a parking lot, will be replaced by additional units; • That it is a challenge to maintain houses on the historical register and still create adaptive reuses sustaining their character, but will perform a public and economic service to co-exist to produce a desired result; • That the Clock Tower's use will be discussed and possibly used as a Marker; • That there will be a relocation of three (3) houses; • That the proposal is to provide a linkage in the alleyway that is green space and pedestrian friendly; • That Mr. Dorling asked that the design for the subterranean garage and access points be more "mild"than what was proposed by the applicant; • That some parking was eliminated trying to respond to the TCRPC' request so as not to view the lot from the street. For this reason, the Clock Tower is proposed; • That by removing the automobile from the experience (garage), it would make the project more amenable; • That the services inside and outside of the Sundy House be enhanced and compatible; • That the attempt is to return the "rhythm"to the street; • That the landscaping is inspired by Sunday House although not as dense and exotic, but with consideration to water usage; ■ That the approach was to treat the small residential units and Bed and Breakfast units; • That the attempt in architecture was not to vary building to building but to blend into the surrounding areas; • That the spaces between the buildings are being kept as per the LDR; • That the blending of the community and the structure is meant to feel like one; • That the variance request is to allow the Clock Tower to take a location near the street, possibly as a Marker; and • That the scale and relationship to the area is trying to be maintained(shown through the PowerPoint presentation); Public Comments There were none. Ms. Alvarez wanted to remind the Board that the Staff Report speaks to the requirement in the LDR Section 4.4.24(F) (4) in reference to the spacing between the buildings. She 6 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes May 2, 2007 stated that since some of the space between the buildings is less than fifteen feet (15'), that compliance upon the site plan application or a waiver request is completed at site plan application, requesting that be added as one of the conditions. Mr. Szerdi stated there is a 10.9 dimension that exists and a section that allows the separate pieces to be connected on the ground level or with covered walkways. He continued that they could talk to Staff about how it is considered and how to figure out the distance in between, and how to deal with it. Board Discussion The Boards comments are summarized below: • Whether the clock can be seen from four(4) angles; • That it is a symmetrical view from the rendering; • That the clock will not be over thirty five feet (35') in height; • That there will be five thousand square feet (5K) of banquet space serving about two hundred (200) people; • That there will be a large deficiency in parking and that on street parking does not exist; • That the applicant plans to develop about fifty (50) on street parking spaces and it is not an inconsistency with urban development; • That the LDR for OSHAD regarding parking discusses total floor area and it must be calculated and considered; • That there is an in lieu space fee of just under three hundred seventy nine thousand ($379,000) for the number of spaces that the applicant has not provided for; • That a per space cost is being calculated at the lower space fee and that it be accepted; • That a caveat be inserted into the conditions that the concept of accepting the fee is suitable, but that the exact amount is to be determined by Staff although it would be more of a condition than a caveat; • That the condition be stated that the applicant either provide the required parking spaces or that they pay the calculated in lieu fee as determined by the parking management advisory board; ■ That the different fees are decided by different districts; • That overall, the West Atlantic Redevelopment Group supported the Clock Tower; • That this is an extra amenity to the project; ■ That it is unsure what is on the back of the clock; • That the alley is dedicated to a width of twenty feet (20'); • That it does not have to be twenty feet (20') of pavement; ■ That it should still be one way traffic and can serve in an emergency capacity; ■ That a request for a two feet (2') dedication was asked for regarding the alley; • That five feet (5')was asked for on the sidewalk; • That there are structures that will be demolished and replaced within the complex; • That there is a reserved location on the property; • That one of the design options resembles the Hoffman House; and • That the Historical Society can help with the research in that regard; 7 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes May 2, 2007 By Separate Motions Conceptual Master Development Plan It was moved by Mr. Cope, seconded by Ms. Lake, and approved 7 to 0 to recommend approval of the conceptual Master Development Plan for Historic South Swinton Avenue and Sundy House, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interiors Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: 1. That all structures approved for demolition are fully recorded upon submittal of the site plan application; 2. That all structures approved for demolition are offered for relocation, if feasible; 3. That no structures are approved for demolition as a part of this application; 4. That all demolition requests are included with the site plan applications; 5. That the site plan application for Block 61 includes a dedicated alley width of twenty- feet (20'); 6. That all dedications outlined in the report are noted on the site plans upon submittal; 7. That, upon application, the site plan phases appropriately address drainage concerns noted in Appendix A; 8. That the technical items regarding parking are addressed upon site plan submittal; 9. That the applicant either provide the required parking spaces or that they pay the calculated in lieu fee as determined by the parking management advisory board; 10. That upon site plan application LDR Section 4.4.24 (F) (4) shall be met or as an alternative a waiver request will be requested relative to the fifteen foot (15') building separation issues. Variance It was moved by Ms. Lake, seconded by Mr. Cope, and approved 7 to 0 to recommend approval of the variance request associated with the subterranean parking garage from LDR Section 4.3.4 (K) for Historic South Swinton Avenue and Sundy House, to reduce the front setback along SW 1st Street from 25' to 12', and the side street setback along SW 1st Avenue from 15' to 2'9" based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(J) (1) subject to the following conditions: 1. That the height of the parking garage wall does not rise above four feet (4')without prior approval by the Historic Preservation Board; 2. That the residential-type inn structures constructed above the garage comply with the setback requirements, not the setback determined by the subject variance request, and; 3. That the variance is associated only with the parking garage. Variance It was moved by Ms. Del Fiandra, seconded by Ms. Peart, and approved 7 to 0 to recommend approval of the variance request associated with the clock tower from LDR Section 4.3.4 (K) for Historic South Swinton Avenue and Sundy House, to reduce the setback along South Swinton Avenue to three feet six inches (3'6") from the required fifteen feet (15') based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(J) (1). 8 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes May 2, 2007 Staff Discussion Ms. Alvarez stated the structure (provided in a photo) at 114 NW 4th Avenue is in disrepair and it is a Code Enforcement issue. She continued that Mr. Diaz, Chief Building Official issued a notice to the owners of unsafe conditions giving thirty (30) days to vacant the property, or that he would order it demolished. It has not yet been demolished. Code Enforcement is waiting action by the Board as to whether to proceed. Ms. Alvarez cited the LDR in respect to what the Chief Building Inspector is authorized to do. Based on when the District was established, the structure is considered to be contributing. Ms. Alvarez stated although she could not speak for the Nuisance Abatement Board, there is a memorandum dated March 30, and that they are processing demolition bids. Ms. Alvarez stated the structure could not be lived in and that it would have to be demolished. It was asked of Ms. Alvarez whether anything could be salvaged. Ms. Alvarez stated there was a request from the Historical Society that any demos that are approved, the Society is allowed to go in and salvage any items. She suggested the Board could make that recommendation. Ms. Barton questioned whether the owner was notified that this discussion was before the Board. Ms. Alvarez responded that he was not and that Code Enforcement asked Ms. Alvarez to bring forward the discussion. Ms. Pyburn stated the owner should be notified before the house is demolished considering that the prior notification of intent did not result in that action, as of yet. Ms. Barton stated proper procedure would be to document the notification to the owner before proceeding to demolish the property. Ms. Alvarez stated it is her understanding that as a result of Code Enforcement's action with the Chief Building Official that an official application would not be required. The Board recommendation would be to make sure the owner has been notified and to document the notification so that the owner knows what is going on. Also, to recommend if the owners allow it, to permit the Historical Society to salvage anything that is of value. Ms. Alvarez stated these recommendations would be forwarded on. It was asked of Ms. Alvarez who would be billed if City demolished the structure. The City would be billed for the demolition and the owner's land would then have a lien on it to repay the costs to the City. V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS Code Enforcement was called regarding Andy Spengler's property. The response was that they would send someone out. Code Enforcement was called on the Hartman House property as well. The response was that they made sure it was secure and that was all they could do about it as there are plans in place. Staff stated they were supposed to discuss the Site Plan extension request this evening for that property but it will be on the June 6, agenda. The extension request is for two (2) years, but the conditions are on it that will have work in progress sooner than that. Staff Comments 9 4 Historic Preservation Board Meeting Minutes May 2, 2007 Regarding appeals last evening, Ms. Alvarez stated that in regard to 238 SE 7th Avenue, the approval was upheld. The decision was postponed on the property at 706 SE 2nd Avenue until the May 15thmeeting of City Commission. The discussions included removing some of the components including lowering the square footage. If positive feedback is provided they are not required to come back to the Historic Board. The awards were supposed to be last night, but they were moved to the 15th as a result of time issues. The May 16th meeting will be canceled. The next meeting will be June 6th There was e-mail to the Board regarding the May 23rd meeting. It was asked of Staff if when the City hires an expert witness are they compensated. The response from Staff was that the expert witness is compensated. VI. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 8:15 p.m. The undersigned is the Acting Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for May 2, 2007 which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on If the Minutes you have received are not completed as indicated above then this means that these are not the official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. 10 Historic Preservation Board Minutes—July 11, 2007 • That if the City approves the motion, whether the owner will demolish the property and in what time frame; • That the owner is aware of the action ongoing this evening; ■ That at least a year ago, the owner agreed to demolish the property; and • Whether conditions could be put upon owner if Ms. Alvarez could have the owner come back. Motion/Findings: It was moved by Mr. Cope, seconded by Ms. Lake, and approved 4 to 1 (Mr. Snider stepped down, Ms. Peart dissented, and Ms. French was absent) to move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness for 34 North Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in LDR Sections 4.5.1(F) (1) (a-e) and 4.5.1(G), and the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the structure be completely documented with two (2) copies of such documentation submitted. Documentation shall include but not be limited to a site survey, measured drawings to include all exterior elevations, floor plans, and significant architectural detailing, photographs and any additional existing documentary information; 2. That, in the course of the demolition, no trees be removed from the site unless prior permission and tree removal permits are obtained from the Building Department; 3. That the Board and the Delray Beach Historical Society be given the opportunity by the property owner to salvage any building materials prior to demolition, and; 4. That the redevelopment plans be required to meet strict historic preservation design guidelines to ensure compatibility with respect to design and massing in relation to the surrounding area. Ms. Barton stated that four (4) votes are necessary to deny this as it is a COA; otherwise it is a majority to approve it. C. 238 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District— Mr. & Mrs. Dan Dietrich, Property Owners; Eliopoulos Architecture, Authorized Agent. Mr. Snider returned to the dais. Ms. Amy Alvarez, Historic Preservation Planner entered the file into the record and presented the proposal for a Consideration of a Variance Request (2007-198) for the reduction of the required front setback from thirty feet (30') to twenty-five feet (25') associated with the new construction of a garage/guest cottage as stated in the Staff Report. Staff's recommendation is at the Board's discretion. Applicant Presentation Mr. Gary Eliopoulos, 205 George Bush Boulevard, representing the applicant stated the comments as summarized below: • That the Board has seen the project before; 3 • Historic Preservation Board Minutes—July 11, 2007 • That the road has already been redone; • That Mr. Eliopoulos offered handouts with several dimensions; and • These handouts showed comparisons to other houses in the area and that the project will not differ as a result of the variance request. Public Comments: Mr. Grabham stated he lives down the street. He stated he doesn't understand why the five foot (5') reduction is necessary in the Historic District, or why it wasn't covered in the original project. Board Discussion The exchange between Ms. Alvarez and the Board can be summarized below: • That there have not been any letters/calls/e-mails received from the neighborhood in regard to this issue; • That the Board has made decisions in the pest (knowledge of numerous sites that received approval); and • That the public has not objected to this item when presented before the City Commission in the past. Motion/Findings: It was moved by Ms. Lake, seconded by Mr. Cope, and approved 6 to 0 (Ms. French absent) to approve the variance request to reduce the required front setback from thirty feet (30') to twenty-five feet (25') associated with the new construction of a garage/guest cottage located at 238 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1 (J) (1). D. 129 NW 4th Avenue, West Settlers Historic District — Migee, LLC, Property Owner; Trend West, Inc., Authorized Agent. Ms. Amy Alvarez, Historic Preservation Planner entered the file into the record and presented the proposal for a Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness (2007-230) for the relocation of a structure from 26 NW 6th Avenue to 129 NW 4th Avenue as stated in the Staff Report. Staff stated positive findings can be found subject to the conditions as stated in the Staff Report Applicant Presentation: Mr. B. J. McCormick, 1413 Shirley Court, Lake Worth, FI, representing the applicant stated that there are two things that have to be given back to P & Z one of which is a correct site plan. Also, a landscaping and parking issue is being addressed at the same time. Public Comments: There were none. 4 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH REGULAR MEETING MEETING DATE: July 11, 2007 LOCATION: City Commission Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Keith Snider, Toni Del Fiandra, Roger Cope, JoAnn Peart, John Miller, Linda Lake MEMBERS ABSENT: Kim French STAFF PRESENT: Amy Alvarez, Denise Valek, and Terrill Barton I. Call To Order Chairman DelFiandra called the meeting to order at 6:05pm. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. Chairman DelFiandra read the City of Delray Beach's procedures for Quasi-Judicial Hearing for all the items on the Agenda. Changes to the Agenda: Item III. A. was postponed. II. MINUTES It was moved by Mr. Cope, seconded by Ms. Lake, and approved 6 to 0 to approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 06, 2007 as written. III. CERTIFICATIONS OF APPROPRIATNESS A. 317 NW 1st Street, West Settlers Historic District — Essie Robinson Green, Property Owner; City of Delray Beach Community Development Division, Authorized Agent/Applicant. Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the demolition of an accessory structure. (The item postponed until further notice) B. 34 North Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District — Genesis, LLC, Owner; Kirk Joseph Witecha, Authorized Agent. There were no Ex Parte Communications Mr. Snider stepped down. Ms. Amy Alvarez, Historic Preservation Planner, entered the file into the record and presented the proposal for a Reconsideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness (2006- 420-COA)for the demolition of a contributing structure as stated in the Staff Report. Historic Preservation Board Minutes—July 11, 2007 Applicant Presentation The applicant was not present. Public Comments George Diaz, Chief Building Official for the City of Delray Beach, stated he believed he condemned the building about a year ago by going through the Code Enforcement process. The comments between Mr. Diaz, Ms. Barton, and the Board are summarized below: • That the City is requesting this action; • That the building is termite infested; • That the building falls under a Level III condition which is a condemnable structure; ■ That it ought to be boarded up/fenced off until plans come in, as it is a safety factor; • That it is negligence by the owner; ■ That the owner offered anyone interested to take the structure away if interested; • That the City's concern is to keep people from being harmed in following City statues; • That there have not been any fines or cost to the City yet; • That the City has not mitigated the property site at this point; • That it is very close to the CRA (location) and not yet addressed; • That you can ask the owner to fence the property but he cannot be forced to construct a fence; • That it seems like a way to circumvent the rules to get what he (the owner)wants; to demolish without plans; • Whether there is anything that the owner can be asked to do to keep the property in compliance; • That if the City steps in, the City could put a lien on the property to recoup expenses of the demolition; • That there is a question as to who may be responsible for making sure the owner complies; • Whether the owner gave permission to demolish the property; • Whether there is anything worthwhile to salvage for the Historical Society; • That the Historical Society has not approached Ms. Alvarez about this property yet; and • That the City cannot act until complaints are acknowledged regarding infestation spreading to the neighboring properties. Public Comments: The public comments, interaction by Mr. Diaz, Staff, and the Board are summarized below: • Whether pressure on the owner could not be greater as a result of an ordinance having been passed; • What the process may be if the Board votes to have the City intercede; • There would be a time element involved to have the owner respond to the action; • That time would be needed for documentation to be processed; • If the City steps in, it is because it is a problem for the public/life/safety issue; • That it usually takes 30 days and could take 6 months to clear the property before demolition; 2 Historic Preservation Board Minutes—July 11, 2007 Board Discussion: The Board confirmed it is being moved within the Historic District. Motion/Findings: It was moved by Ms. Lake, seconded by Mr. Cope, and approved 6 to 0 (Ms. French absent) to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness (2007-230) for the relocation of a structure from 26 NW 6th Avenue to 129 NW 4th Avenue, West Settlers Historic District, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation subject to the following conditions: 1. That a complete landscape plan is submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department for review by the City Horticulturalist prior to Site Plan Certification, and; 2. That a revised site plan is submitted prior to Site Plan Certification showing the following information: a. Accommodations for two (2) parking spaces located outside of the front setback, b. Compliance with the Standard Plan Items as noted in the Staff Report; c. Accurate measurements from the property line to the center line of NW 4th Avenue; d. Accurate measurements from the property line to the all required setbacks, e. Accurate measurements from the required setbacks to each side of the structure, and; f. All hardscaping, including the driveway material. 3. That .any exterior alterations to the structure are approved under a separate Certificate of Appropriateness request. IV. ACTION ITEMS A. 123 South Swinton Avenue, House of Vintage, Old School Square Historic District — Michelle Parparian, Property Owner. Ex-Parte Communications: Mr. Snider's office spoke to the applicant but his decision will not be swayed either way. Ms. Amy Alvarez, Historic Preservation Planner entered the file into the record and presented the proposal for a Consideration of a Class IV Site Plan extension request as stated in the Staff Report. Staff's recommendation is at the Board's discretion. Ms. Peart wondered if Staff's concerns were addressed. The elevations shown were not those approved. Ms. Alvarez stated she will provide the folder that is with her showing the previously drawn elevations. Applicant Presentation: Ms. Michelle Parparian, 123 South Swinton, owner stated the comments summarized below: 5 { Historic Preservation Board Minutes—July 11, 2007 • She is waiting for things from the mortgage company that is delaying the right of way dedication; • It should be cleared in a week or two; • She hired a new engineer with renewed plans. It is no longer boxed looking, nor modern looking; and • That the time frame was delayed more than once and will be ready to build Nov. 2007. The Board asked if there was any reason for requesting a 24 month extension as opposed to an 18 month extension. Ms. Parparian thought 18 months would be enough. Public Comments: There were none. Rebuttal: Ms. Alvarez stated Staff has been working with the applicant. Board Discussion: The Board's comments can be summarized below: • That newer plans were not drawn up by Silverstein and that this new plan includes the conditions approved previously; • Whether any permit documents had been filed; • It is approved and before the Board for an extension; • That it is not surprising that Engineering is coming in after it was presented and adding two feet (2') and • That Francisco Perez was Chairman at the time of the previous approval. Motion/Findings: It was motioned by Ms. Lake, seconded by Ms. DelFiandra, and approved 6 to 0 (Ms. French absent) to move approval of the request for a 18 month extension of the Certificate of Appropriateness and Class IV site plan, landscape plan, and design elements approvals for 123 South Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request, and approval thereof, meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.4(D) and (F)(1) & (3) of the Land Development Regulations, subject to the original conditions of approval identified by the Board and that an alley dedication of two feet (2') be made prior to site plan certification. Said motion passed with a vote of 6-0. (Ms. French absent) V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS • Public Comments • Reports from Historic District Representatives • Board Members The Board's comments are summarized below: • That it is nice to see work being done on Nassau Street and A1A; 6 Historic Preservation Board Minutes—July 11, 2007 • That the tile roof came through permitting (Del-Ida Park); • That Ms. Alvarez received a call that the houses on South Swinton (cottages) were sold, but no information was obtained about the demolition and there are still real estate signs on the property; ■ That code enforcement be approached to do more about properties that need attention as opposed to it coming to the Board; • That Ms. Alvarez does notify code enforcement officers when it comes to her attention; • That the next meeting is August 1st; • What the status is of the revised LDR's; • That there is a draft ordinance in the works as per Ms. Alvarez and she hopes that it comes before the Board likely on August 15th for their recommendation; • That the property extension granted to NE 7th had been granted after the work had been completed. • That Al Berg in code enforcement be called to help with changes; ■ That the properties at 711 North Swinton and 34 South Swinton are being neglected; and • That Ms. Alvarez can and does check on the properties. Staff comments: Ms. Alvarez stated there will not be a meeting next week. VI. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 7:05p. The undersigned is the Acting Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for July 11, 2007 which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on If the Minutes you have received are not completed as indicated above then this means that these are not the official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. 7 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH REGULAR MEETING MEETING DATE: August 1, 2007 LOCATION: City Commission Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Keith Snider, Toni Del Fiandra, Roger Cope, JoAnn Peart, John Miller, Linda Lake, Kim French STAFF PRESENT: Amy Alvarez, Denise Valek, and Terrill Barton I. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Miller read the City of Delray Beach's procedures for Quasi-Judicial Hearing for all the items on the Agenda. Chairman John Miller called the meeting to order at 6:00p.m. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. II. CERTIFICATIONS OF APPROPRIATNESS A. 133 NW 5th Avenue, West Settlers Historic District — Community Redevelopment Agency, Property Owner&Applicant. No ex parte Communication. Ms. Amy Alvarez entered the file into the record and presented the proposal for a Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness and Class II Site Plan Modification (2007-256-SPI) associated with exterior alteration to a non-contributing multi-family structure as stated in the Staff Report. Staff recommends approval of this item subject to the conditions as stated in the Staff Report. Ms. Alvarez handed out a checklist to be used for the Board's considerations. Applicants Presentation: Walt Gerhard, Property Manager, Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) stated that the north wall on the second floor is unstable. Also, that they are proposing aluminum around the structure up to forty-two inches (42"). It is at thirty-six (36") now, and they will continue the railing down inclusive of a set of stairs. Public Comments: There were none. Board Discussion The Board's comments are summarized below: ■ That the satellite dishes will be coming down; ■ That the Bahamas shutters will be on the first floor (double windows); Historic Preservation Board Minutes - August 1, 2007 • That the Board is pleased with the colors; • That the dumpster enclosure is not seen; it was part of landscape's review; • That since it is a multi-family unit, whether a concrete block is required; • That it can be either screened or concrete; • That the shutters are appropriate to the era; • That no additional lighting was indicated in the application; ■ That the overhang on the South side will remain; and ■ That the windows were recently replaced in January. For the record, Ms. Barton asked the Board to go through the checklist before a motion is made citing #'s 1A, 2, and 6 would be applicable to this application. This is taken from the LDR as part of the Board's analysis. There was a discussion that the points are difficult to answer and could not be compared to adjacent buildings at this point. As a stand alone, there wouldn't be a problem with them. Ms. Barton asked if the materials and the colors are generally compatible to the Historic West Settlers District and to state that for the record. The question was read for the record. Are the colors and materials compatible?Yes, but the color scheme is boring. Ms. Alvarez detailed the color choices as stated below: • The shutters are sable. • The eyebrows are snow berries (white), the railing is similar to bronze. • The trim is Rockwood Terracotta. ■ The overhangs are a form of yellow (Glad). • The wall out front is Butternut which is now possibly a rail and may not apply. The Board summarized that overall it is considered to be compatible with the knowledge that is before the Board. Motion/Findings: It was moved by Ms. Lake, seconded by Ms. French, and approved 7 to 0 to move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness for 133 NW 5t" Avenue, West Settlers Historic District by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(7) and (E)(8), and the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines subject to the condition that screening is provided for the dumpster, refuse areas, and mechanical equipment. B. 242 North Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District — Sally Gebo, Property Owner. Ex parte communication: Ms. Peart was speaking to Linda before the meeting but it will not impact any decisions. Ms. Alvarez entered the file into the record and presented the proposal for a Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness (2006-420-COA) for the installation of accordion shutters on a contributing structure as stated in the Staff Report. 2 I Historic Preservation Board Minutes - August 1, 2007 Applicant Presentation Ms. Lynda Kidd representing the applicant stated the Board approved shutters on her house which is the neighboring house to the applicant. Ms. Kidd's comments can be summarized below: • That existing frames would attach to the shutters and they are painted white which was previously approved by the City; • That pictures were presented of her house which illustrates what the applicant's shutters would resemble and that they are not really visible; • That they are easy to install; • That she hoped that last year's approval would yield other alternatives(shutter types) than what is available now; • That the only alternative would be impact glass which would be costly; • That a neighboring property at 202 North Swinton has had its front door sealed with aluminum siding and the windows at the top corner have plywood on them for the last four years; • That she was cited for not having a painted fence and this property has not had a painted fence for the last five years; • That 220 North Swinton has looked like it has for the last 1.5 year; • That 214 North Swinton, was used as a supply house for a plumbing company, also used for an artist, and has had plywood down for the last 3 years; and • That she requested the City to look at their guidelines for safety alternatives for resident's shutters. Public Comments: None Rebuttal Ms. Alvarez's comments are summarized below: • That there is a system referred to as, "Fabric Shield" that is easy to use; • That there might be an accordion shutter already installed on the front window underneath the large awning (without documentation for it); • That a box underneath the awning might be an option, but if the awning is removed, it may be an issue in the future if the box still remains; • That the other addresses mentioned have been cited; and • That canvas awnings age and would have to be replaced in the future. Board Discussion: The Board's comments are summarized below: ■ That they are in favor of the residents request and it is more of a safety issue; • That the shutters on Ms. Kidd's home are visibly not appealing; • That the Board is hesitant to state that you cannot protect your home especially in the Historic District in spite of the fact that they are not aesthetically appealing; • That the Board is attempting to conform to the LDR and appreciates that the adjacent properties are not being maintained; • That the Board is willing to allow the shutters in spite of how they look and their operability is well received; • That when the design guidelines come before the Board, that could be part of the recommendation; 3 Historic Preservation Board Minutes - August 1, 2007 • That in the past the Board has denied accordion shutters and will continue to vote that way based on the LDR, although these do look radically different than the boxes that roll down; • That they would like to see it painted to match the structure on both properties; • That the shutters are not permanent and can be removed without damaging the historical integrity of the house; • That the Board is there for consideration for those that need it most and are trying to maintain the integrity of their historic houses as well as protect them; • That there are houses on Swinton that are boarded up with plywood; • That the windows are not original and were replaced in 2002; • That there are other"sister" houses on South Federal and near George Bush; • That the builder is trying to be named and that the houses withstood the past hurricanes; • That the applicant had researched an alternative that didn't alter the look of the home; • That a precedence not be set for not looking at alternatives; and • That the Board should offer research/alternatives to the applicant when they present an application; Ms. Barton asked the Board to use item 1 D from the checklist which follows the letter of the law of the LDR pursuant to Section 2.4.68 and 4.5.1. She added that the Board has been appointed not only to apply the law but to apply the facts of every case that comes before the Board to the law, in making the findings. Otherwise, it would be up to Staff to administratively approve whatever comes before them. The Board does need to follow the LDR but they do not have to be concerned with setting precedent. Ms. Pyburn wanted to make sure that it was clear to the Board that they have the ability to take the facts of this case, apply the law, and make a determination. The Board reviewed the checklist as noted below: 1) Are the shutters removable? Yes, but would not be removed after each use in their design. 2) Are they located so that they are not visible from public the right of way? Yes 3) Are the tracks compatible with the exterior surface and structure? Yes The Board is split on question # 1. #2 is a definite no. #3 is a consensus of yes. Motion/Findings: It was moved by Mr. Cope, seconded by Ms. Peart, and approved 6 to 1 (Ms. Lake dissented) to move approval of COA-2007-264 for 242 North Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(g) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. 4 r Historic Preservation Board Minutes - August 1, 2007 III. REPORTS AND COMMENTS The Board's comments are summarized below: That work is being performed at NE 3`d St. / NE 7th (Hartman House) regarding repairing the existing windows; Question as to why people are being citing for frames on houses; That Ms. Alvarez can look into specific addresses. Question as to whether Ms. Alvarez reported people for shutters and why hasn't she reported them (plywood on the windows), which is worse than hurricane shutters; That Ms. Alvarez found that some of the accordion shutters were approved and some were not applied for, or approved; That Ms. Alvarez can look into code enforcement compliance regarding the plywood; and That Staff does not pick on people as Ms. Peart stated; and That a house across the street from the Kidd house was cited and it is stated in the Staff Report; Staff comments are summarized below: • That the LDR amendments will be at the next meeting; • That there may be two items maybe three on the next Agenda; • That a project has proceeded forward as a result of a matching grant from Palm Beach County; • That it is difficult to find applications for the Historic District on the website site; as they are not easily visible; • That (Management Information Systems) MIS, handles the web site issues and it would be easier for Staff and the Board to advise them; • That work is being done to get the Historical Markers and applying for grants for them becoming available by 2008; and • That a presentation will be offered and notifications sent to notify people regarding the Markers, once everything is finalized. IV. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 7:05p.m. The undersigned is the Acting Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for August 1, 2007 which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on If the Minutes you have received are not completed as indicated above then this means that these are not the official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. 5 4 f MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH REGULAR MEETING MEETING DATE: August 15, 2007 LOCATION: City Commission Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Keith Snider, Toni Del Fiandra, Roger Cope, JoAnn Peart, John Miller, Linda Lake STAFF PRESENT: Amy Alvarez, Terrill Barton, and Denise Valek I. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman John Miller called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. Chairman Miller read the City of Delray Beach's procedures for Quasi-Judicial Hearing for all the items on the Agenda. II. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS Ex parte Communication. Mr. Snider advised he received phone calls from members of the public. Mr. Cope attended workshops, received e-mails, and phone calls Mr. Peart spoke to Mr. Chuck Key and received an e-mail from Matt Grabham. Ms. DelFiandra received an e-mail but did not open it. Ms. Lake received phone calls, e-mails and attended workshops. Chairman Miller received e-mails from Mr. Chuck Key. A. Forward a recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Board for City initiated amendments to the Land Development Regulations (LDRs) which intend to clarify the current regulations, provide parameters, and define compatible development within the historic districts. The amendments are primarily based on recommendations provided by REG Architects, the consultants hired during the.moratorium to find resolutions to the recent concerns over the level and type of development affecting historic preservation efforts within all five (5) of the City's historic districts. Ms. Alvarez entered the file into the record and presented the proposal for a recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Board regarding City-initiated amendments to the LDRs that resulted from a comprehensive review of the existing regulations, as they relate to the City's five (5) historic districts as stated in the Staff Report. Staff recommends approval of this item. Historic Preservation Board Minutes—August 15, 2007 Chairman Miller stated this is not a Quasi Judicial item and therefore public comments are not required. He did, however, open the floor if anyone wanted to speak. Public Comments Ms. Carolyn Patton, property owner at 16 Marine Way stated she supported the LDRs and that they should go forward. She thanked Mr. Hernandez for all his work but that a critical change needed to be made. She continued that change would be in Section 4.5.1 E (2) (c), which is a text change (survey area). Her comments are summarized below: • That as the ordinance currently exists, it compares new construction to the historic buildings within the district in an attempt to support the districts; ■ That the survey area has grown (since the last time it was looked at) to include both the contributing and non contributing structures in the eleven (11) house survey. ■ That will compromise Historic Districts going forward; • That 70% lot coverage houses will be taken into effect which would not be fair in the Historic District; • That she has spoken to Staff and that "both the contributing and non contributing structures" language should be removed, and leave it as "contributing structures" only; and • That the additional changes should be made throughout the matrix as well. Ms. Claudia Willis, 60 Marine Way was confused by Section 2.2.6 in that she wasn't sure about the variance process (4.5.1) and what this process would do regarding following procedure. Mr. Matt Grabham, 350 SE 7th Avenue, stated the survey area has always been contributing and non contributing buildings. His comments are summarized below: • That they are supposed to be clarifying the ordinance and that the definition of what is historic, is confusing; • That he e-mailed most and offered the States' definition which was presented for the record; • That the City's definition does not state the same; is That a letter was written and read from Randal Scott Architects stating that the comments of some architects practicing in Delray Beach have ignored and not addressed some points, summarizing the guidelines are too restricted; • That a copy has been submitted for the record. Ms. Aleida Riley, 65 Palm Square, advised that the Board needs the privilege to have engineers look at buildings that have to be demolished. Her understanding is that when a building is proposed for demolition, an engineer has to deem it unsafe, yet in West Palm Beach they have to have the construction department state in strong language that it is a public hazard, for it to be considered for demolition. Mr. Jerry Barding, 711 SE 3`d Street, stated the properties along the Intercostal have significant value to it and to restrict how a demolished home could be rebuilt would create a hardship. He continued that the newer homes in the area have more significant value than his own home, and that is unjust. 2 Historic Preservation Board Minutes—August 15, 2007 Ms. Barton confirmed that the resident could rebuild what was there before (if for instance a non conforming structure is damaged by a hurricane), although you couldn't build something new next to it by the new standards. Mr. Barding clarified that if someone wanted to buy his house, tear down the property and build something new in the same footprint, it would not be possible. Ms. Barton agreed. It was agreed that the land is the value, not the house. Mr. Francisco Perez-Azua, Perez Architects, comments can be summarized below: • That he was present a the meeting regarding feedback on the guidelines; • That most (architects) had a problem with the survey area; • That someone insists that the survey area must remain in the LDR change; ■ That it has been over a year that the survey area has been in discussion; • That he previously stated this creates for inequality between properties and the respective owners rights; • That compatibility means co-existence not size; and • That a professional has to hired to survey surrounding properties to determine what can be changed at the site in question. Ms. Shannon Dawson, 527 N. Swinton Avenue, comments are summarized below: • That she was at all the meetings and there are some good ideas in the guideline book that Rick proposed, but the LDRs are the issue; ■ That the attempt at a previous meeting was to clarify the LDR, not to re-write them; • That the intent of Historic preservation is lost and it is more about size and keeping things the same in the name of compatibility; ■ It is not easy to understand what is trying to be stated; and ■ That a relatively easy ordinance has been traded for complicated code. Ms. Karen Goranson, 232 Dixie Boulevard, stated she bought the "eyesore" on the block years ago which she improved upon over the years based on the city guidelines as they evolved. She stated she is confused by the term "Historic Preservation", in that she believes it means keeping the property preserved and keeping it in good shape to enable it to appreciate and be retained. Ms. Goranson continued that demolishing what exists and rebuilding is not Historic Preservation. She added that watching her neighborhood change through the years, is contributing to losing the integrity of what the historic district was. Ms. Goranson stated she is in favor of guidelines but hearing what she is hearing tonight is distressing, especially since she has followed the rules for 26 years. Ms. Goranson concluded that she doesn't understand how new ideas, whether it be for financial gain, or because of a personal taste, relates to historic preservation. Rebuttal • Mr. Gonzalez stated the study is almost a year old; • That there was a follow up meeting with Staff to clarify the issues; and • That there are ways to work around some of the comments stated by Mr. Grabham. Ms. Barton addressed the comments by Ms. Willis' question pertaining to 2.2.6 (D) (4). She 3 Historic Preservation Board Minutes—August 15, 2007 advised that was changed pursuant to a recent lawsuit that came out of Tampa where there were historical preservation guidelines and a developer wanted to build a fifty (50) story condominium building. The courts stated that since there was no explicit language in the ordinance that provided for the historic preservation guidelines, they could trump the requirements to the LDR regarding zoning, and build to the limitations of that zoning district. In essence, Ms. Barton added that the Board could apply lesser limitations (stricter standards), than what is provided in the code, but that it could not be arbitrary regarding what our LDR zoning categories provide for, in reference to compatibility. Board Discussion The Board's comments are summarized below: • That if the guidelines are such to maintain the integrity of the historic district, there is support (from Ms. Goranson); ■ They questioned if there is an alternative to the survey area method; • That the properties within the three hundred feet (300') radius are within the historic district; • That there are differences to the contributing and non contributing areas as to the past and present; • That the pieces independently are inconclusive and that it is a modern compromise; • That it is specified as to where the survey area is; • Whether there is an official to review the demolition and will certify the demolition; ■ That the language on page five (5) is acceptable; • What the Type A and historic structure reports look like; ■ What is the basic difference between Type A versus Type B; • In reply by staff it requires looking at the type of zoning, if it is a residential structure by definition, and all proposal in the (RO) Residential Office District, it would be Type A; • If it is individually designated, or if additions are being built to contributing or non- contributing that do not fit into Type A, then it would be Type B; • If it is under the 25% change of the exterior and it is in the back, you do not have to concern yourself with the guideline; • The radius determination would need to be requested and it is inexpensive to obtain; • That the orientation clause regarding a garage is conflicting, but it is clarified that if they do not have a garage, there would be a problem. There would have to be a consistency with the majority of properties. Also in any and all cases, you want to make sure it is to the side or there is an alley from the rear. The holding capacity would be two vehicles; • Ms. Barton added the language needs to be either"shall" or"may"; • That avoiding the commercial parking lot look is part of the guideline; there is flexibility; • That if the second story exceeds more than 50% of the first story, it is a two story structure; • That the roof lines are all very eclectic and as long as the street is complemented it would be suitable, but mixing of architectural styles should not be mixed together on the same property; • That the lesser of the four (4) options part, is not suitable to Mr. Miller (pages 23-24 and 30) but all other points are agreeable; • That variances can still be allowed so as not to restrict development; • That the restriction of the survey area is being compared to contributing and non- contributing structures alike; • That the existing definition is different from the definition in March; • That the LDRs are all inclusive; 4 ti Historic Preservation Board Minutes—August 15, 2007 • Question about Mr. Barton's house and whether a larger structure can be built on the Intercoastal and whether he has been informed of what is allowed (approximately six or seven thousand square feet (6K or 7K) feet. • That the survey area is the most important component of the report, as a domino effect could occur in terms of building larger houses in the area; ■ That they lost sight of those who appreciate the small historic district area that is trying' to be preserved; • That this has been rewritten for the sake of SE 7`h Avenue; ■ That some of the architects are part of the problem; ■ That everyone is supportive of the historic districts and that the set of guidelines have done a lot to preserve what exists; and • That provisions be made to review the guidelines as the process proceeds; Motion/Findings: It was moved by Mr. Cope, seconded by Ms. Peart, and approved 4 to 2 (Ms. Lake and Mr. Miller dissenting) to move approval of a recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Board of the amendments to the Land Development Regulations (LDRs) associated with Ordinance 68-06 by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. 5 NE 1st Street, Delray Beach Historical Society, Old School Square Historic District — Delray Beach Historical Society, Applicant; City of Delray Beach, Property Owner; Digby Bridges, Authorized Agent. Ex Parte Communication. Ms. Peart stated she wrote a letter in favor of the project and spoke to Mr. Bob Ganger at the Historical Society. Although Ms. Barton indicated there might be a slight voting conflict, as a result of Ms. Peart not benefiting by any financial gain, she would not have to step down. Ms. Alvarez entered the file into the record and presented the proposal for approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness that incorporates a Class III site Plan modification, Landscape Plan, and design elements as stated in the Staff report. Staff recommends approval of the item subject to the conditions as stated in the Staff Report as well as an additional parking condition pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(D) (2) (b), the parking spaces and alley shall have a combined minimum depth of 42' and a minimum width of ten feet (10')when back out parking is located on an alley. The provided depth for the five (5) spaces located along the alley is approximately thirty-eight feet (38'). Applicant Presentation Mr. Ganger President of the Historical Society stated that the City has ownership of the property and its land and therefore, the City decides what to do with their land. He furthered that the issues are minor, that young people will be touring the house museums and it is a privilege that Delray Beach can still maintain them. In addition, a little village is attempting to be created with the Hunt house. 5 Historic Preservation Board Minutes—August 15, 2007 He said the driveway will have some sod, but that it will probably be asphalt. Deciding how to separate the cars from the people will be the issue. Mr. Ganger is in agreement with the conditions. Morning Thunder Construction is the contractor and is a specialist in restoration. They have been working with the Society for six (6) months pro bono. They are attempting to work together as quickly as possible. A grant has been awarded by the State and they will be working with the CRA. The Hunt House was a vegetable farm in the past. Public Comments: None Board Discussion: The Board's comments are summarized below: • That the entire area could be sod using as less asphalt as possible; • That Turfblock could be utilized as there is more grass than concrete; • That the City would be saving money not using concrete; • That it would have to be acceptable to the City Engineer; • That the applicant would prefer the area look rural; • That the applicant does not have the budget and is appreciative of the City in deciding to keep the environment and children in the forefront of their decisions; • That the roof is in question as to what it will become, based on budget; • That the chimney may be recreated and when doing the roof, that is the time to consider the chimney; and • That the house will be moved in early November and that two (2) trees on the property now, will have to be removed. Motion/Findings: It was moved by Ms. Lake, seconded by Mr. Cope, and approved 6 to 0 to move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness and Class III site plan modification (2007-242-SPM- SPR-CL3), landscape plan and design elements for the property located at 5 NE 1st Street, Old School Square Historic District (Delray Beach Historical Society) by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in the Sections of the Land Development Regulations analyzed throughout the report, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. 1. That the building relocation and the associated foundation building permit may be approved prior to Site Plan Certification; 2. That all other required building permits not noted above may be approved after Site Plan Certification has been received; 3. That all setbacks are noted and illustrated on the site plan; 4. That the handicap ramp is illustrated on the elevations; 5. That the handicap ramp is made of wood and this be noted on the plans; 6. That the roof material(s) is noted on the plans; 7. That all hardscape materials are noted on applicable plans; 6 Historic Preservation Board Minutes —August 15, 2007 8. That all Site Plan Technical Items noted below are addressed prior to site plan certification: a. Provide existing elevations on existing roadway including edge of pavement and center line. b. Provide finished floor elevation. If finished floor elevation is less than 8-inches above centerline of adjacent road a certification is required from a professional registered engineer stating that the property has adequate drainage to ensure that flooding will not occur in a 100-year storm event. LDR Section 7.1.3 (B) (2). c. Site is required to retain 5 year 1 hour storm (3.2") in addition to meeting water quality criteria (1"). Provide signed and sealed drainage calculations and indicate how storm water will be retained on site. See LDR Section 2.4.3 (D) (4) and (7). d. Clearly indicate limits of right of way and center line of the road. e. Indicate sight distances at all ingress/egress points and all intersections. Sight triangles should be indicated on landscape and engineering plans. Provide copy of the approved landscape plans. Per Section 4.6.14 of LDR's, any landscaping in the site triangle "shall provide unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 3- feet and 6-feet" this includes tree trunks. f. Provide location of existing water service on engineering plans; please indicate how building will be served. g. Provide 2-feet dedication in alley and 20' x 20' corner clip at corner of NE 1st Street and N Swinton Avenue. h. Indicate location of existing sewer service on engineering plans. A cleanout will be required on the existing sewer service at a maximum distance of 18-inches from the right-of-way line and/or easement line. i.Provide on the detail sheet City of Delray Beach Standard Detail WW 4.1, WW 5.1 or 5.2 (which ever is applicable). j.Provide a detailed description of how each of these comments has been addressed with next submittal, along with two sets of revised plans to the City of Delray Beach Engineering Department, 434 S Swinton Ave., Delray Beach, FL 33444. 9. That a two foot, six inch (2'6") right-of-way dedication along NE 1st Street is made prior to site plan certification unless otherwise required upon DSMG review; 10. That a two foot (2') right-of-way dedication along the alley is made prior to site plan certification unless otherwise required upon DSMG review; 11. That a bicycle rack is provided on site; 12. That all new parking spaces and driveway spaces provided for surrounding the property shall be either stabilized sod, brick pavers, or Turfblock; and 13. Parking shall be provided along the alleyway and shall be done in compliance with LDR Section 4.6.9 (D) (2) (b) of the LDRs, and the handicap parking spaces shall remain as is. To clarify, Ms. Pyburn stated the handicap spaces shall remain as they are. Ms. Willis questioned whether the teacher's housing which was torn down is at the same location. Mr. Gangor didn't believe so. He continued that the location has five (5) or six (6) dwellings there and that the Bradshaw House which is one of them should be saved. IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS Public Comments The comments are summarized below: 7 Historic Preservation Board Minutes—August 15, 2007 1. That when using the PAPA website it is fairly easy to put in square footage of a property and; 2. That wanting a second opinion from an engineer is difficult to obtain as a civilian, but perhaps the City could ensure that the second opinion is obtained. The Board's comments are summarized below: • To thank John for his Board term; • That there was no intention to discourage all architects; • That the majority of comments are directed toward not allowing the developers to do something as opposed to what is in the best interest of the community; • That the districts should be left the way they are and saved; • That the part of the LDRs do not allow for demolition as easily; • That if there is restriction of the districts, the return may be better, citing Key West as an example; and • That the restrictions may devalue the property resale price. Staff Comments Ms Alvarez asked the Board if any guide books are needed, and informed them that there is an Advisory Board workshop tomorrow night. V. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m. The undersigned is the Acting Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for August 15, 2007 which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on If the Minutes you have received are not completed as indicated above then this means that these are not the official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. 8 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT Applicant: EPOCH (Expanding and Preserving Our Cultural Heritage) Authorized Agent: Judson Architecture, Inc. Property Owner: City of Delray Beach Project Location: 154-170 NW 5th Avenue, West Settlers Historic District HPB Meeting Date: September 4, 2008 File No.: 2008-234-SPI-CL2 ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is that of approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness and Class II Site Plan Modification for the Spady Cultural Complex located at 154-170 NW 5th Avenue, West Settlers Historic District, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F). BACKGROUND The subject properties to be developed are located at 154 and 170 NW 5th Avenue. The property located at 154 consists of the South Twelve Feet of Lot 7 & Lot 8, Melvin S. Burd Subdivision, while 170 consists of Lots 5-6, and the North 26.25 Feet of Lot 7, Melvin S. Burd Subdivision. All of the described lots are contiguous and located on the west side of NW 5th Avenue between NW 1st and NW 2"d Streets. The zoning district is CBD (Central Business District). Two structures currently exist on the subject properties: the two-story, 1,077 square foot S.D. Spady Cultural Arts Museum, which was built in 1926, and the one-story, 965 square foot Susan B. Williams house, which was built in 1935. Each structure was individually listed on the Local Register of Historic Places in 1995 and both are located in the West Settlers Historic District. The two-story Spady House is a Mediterranean Revival style residence of wood-frame construction clad in stucco. It is recognized for its architectural significance as well as its cultural significance as the home of a prominent black educator and community leader in the City, Solomon D. Spady. The S.D. Spady House/Cultural Museum, houses the offices for the non-profit organization EPOCH (Expanding & Preserving Our Cultural Heritage) who manage the museum, and are the applicants of the subject development proposal. The Susan B. Williams House is a bungalow style structure. It is also recognized not only for its architectural significance but for its cultural significance, as well. Susan B. Williams was a mid-wife who often provided the only medical service in the historic Sands area, part of the current West Settlers Historic District. The Susan B. Williams house, which was relocated to its present location in 1999, was originally located at 30 NW 3rd Avenue. The relocation was necessitated by the expansion of the tennis center. At the City Commission meeting of January 3, 2006, the conditional use application for an amphitheater was approved. The amphitheater is for use not only relating to events promoted by EPOCH, but will also be available for rent to host private and/or public events such as weddings and musical presentations. The amphitheater will also have audio and lighting systems to accommodate voice and music for small productions. The conditional use approval was attached with the following conditions: Spady Cultural Complex Class II Site Plan Modification; 2008-234-SPI-CL2 September 4, 2008 HPB Meeting; Page 2 of 7 1. That EPOCH receive written permission from St. Paul's for use of its parking facility for any particular event, or that other arrangements acceptable to the City are made; 2. That the amphitheater is not used if the parking arrangement with St. Paul's is terminated unless other parking arrangements are made which are acceptable to the City; 3. That EPOCH obtain City approval for any event at which more than fifty (50) attendees are expected; 4. That no more than three daytime and two nighttime events are held weekly. 5. That the hours of operation on Fridays and Saturdays not extend beyond 11:00 pm and 10:00 pm on all other days; 6. That EPOCH apply to the City for a special permit for any event where the amphitheater is to be rented to a third party, including approval of any amplified sound at the event. 7. That amplified sound be otherwise permitted only at Kids Cultural Club and EPOCH events. The conditional use approval, which was originally valid until January 3, 2008, was extended until July 3, 2009 by the City Commission at their December 11, 2007 meeting. Therefore, the conditional use approval will remain valid until this time. At the HPB Meeting of May 2, 2007, a Class IV Site Plan Modification and height waiver request for the following components were approved with conditions: • Restoration and adaptive reuse of the Susan B. Williams House to contain offices and children's activity rooms; • Construction of a two-story, ancillary structure located to the rear of the S.D. Spady House, and containing restroom facilities, concession stand, and offices; • Construction of an amphitheater located to the rear of the Susan B. Williams House; • Landscaping and additional site improvements. The conditions attached to the Class IV Site Plan Modification approval were primarily related to the restoration of the Susan B. Williams House, minor design changes to the ancillary structure, and standard technical comments to be addressed. In addressing the conditions of approval, additional revisions to the amphitheater were incorporated, which resulted in the submittal of this current Class II Site Plan Modification. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject application proposed the following as revisions to the previous site plan approval: • Increase overall dimensions of amphitheater from 35'x27' to 43' x 44'; • Increase in amphitheater height from sixteen feet, six inches (16' 6") to twenty feet, one inch (20'1"); • Change roof material of amphitheater from painted corrugated metal to dimensional asphalt shingles; • Increase seating capacity from fifty (50) to sixty (60); • Change seating type from three (3) rows of ground level stepped seating, to four (4) rows of aluminum benches and spaces for wheelchair accessibility; • Installation of a PVC picket fence (white) to be used as railing along west perimeter of amphitheater; • Addition of steel columns with simulated keystone pattern base on the amphitheater; • Specification of PVC as the material for the porch columns on the Susan B. Williams House; • Specification of PVC as the material for the first floor columns on the Ancillary Structure and addition of capital and base to columns; • Reduction of Open Space from previously approved 46% to proposed 42%; Spady Cultural Complex Class II Site Plan Modification; 2008-234-SPI-CL2 September 4, 2008 HPB Meeting; Page 3 of 7 • Revision of brick paver walkways throughout to concrete with simulated keystone pattern lined with brick pavers; • All colors are noted as "to be determined." The Class II Site Plan Modification is now before the Board for consideration. ANALYSIS COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. The subject property is located within the West Atlantic Avenue Neighborhood area of the CBD Zoning District. The goal for this area is to provide for development that is consistent with the adopted West Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Plan and the Downtown Delray Beach Master Plan. The emphasis is on the preservation and enhancement of existing neighborhoods, while promoting a pedestrian friendly commercial area along Atlantic Avenue that contains a mix of residential, commercial and civic functions. Businesses that are oriented toward serving the local neighborhood, as opposed to a regional area, are encouraged. Therefore, the subject property is subject to compliance with those additional regulations noted in the LDRs. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), Development Standards Matrix, the CBD zoning District requires a minimum of 10% open space. The proposal indicates the amount of open space provided as 42%. Therefore, positive findings can be made with respect to the open space requirement. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.13(F)(1)(a), Central Business District (CBD) Special Regulations — West Atlantic Avenue Neighborhood and SW/NW 5th Avenue, the overall height of buildings shall be a minimum of twenty-five feet (25') and a maximum height of forty-eight (48') feet in height. The proposed height of the amphitheater is twenty feet, one inch (20"1') at its ultimate height and decreases the height non-conformity while maintaining the neighborhood character. Therefore, positive findings can be made as a waiver to the minimum height requirement was previously granted by the City Commission to provide for a height minimum of sixteen feet, six inches (16'6"). Landscaping A complete landscape plan is included in the subject development proposal. This landscape plan exceeds all code requirements for the City of Delray Beach, and has been deemed to be in compliance with the City's Senior Landscape Planner. Furthermore, the landscape design utilizes numerous varieties of Florida native plant material which will enhance the beauty of the subject property. Site Plan Technical Review The City Engineer reviewed the subject plans and noted that the proposed sanitary sewer connection is unacceptable, and that a new tie-in cannot be made to City service on N.W. 5th Avenue. Therefore, a revision is required and should be provided prior to site plan certification. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H)(5), Prior to approval, a finding must be made that any Certificate of Appropriateness which is to be approved is consistent with Historic Preservation purposes pursuant to Objective A-4 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and specifically with provisions of Section 4.5.1, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Spady Cultural Complex Class II Site Plan Modification; 2008-234-SPI-CL2 September 4, 2008 HPB Meeting: Page 4 of 7 LDR Section 4.5.1 (E) Development Standards: All development regardless of use within individually designated historic properties and/or properties located within historic districts, whether contributing or noncontributing, residential or nonresidential, shall comply with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, these regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(2)(c)(4), Major and Minor Development, the subject application is considered "Minor Development" as it is zoned CBD. (E)(4) Alterations. In considering proposals for alterations to the exterior of historic buildings and structures and in applying development and preservation standards, the documented, original design of the building may be considered, among other factors. (E)(5) Standards and Guidelines. A historic site, building, structure, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall only be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, as amended from time to time. Those applicable Standards and Guidelines are noted below: • A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment. (Standard 1) The proposed revisions are generally in keeping with the subject Standard. • The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. (Standard 2) While the character of the property will be changed through the proposed development, it should not detract from the historic resources which front the streetscape. Overall, the property will be enhanced. With respect to the alterations of the Susan B. Williams House, this Standard is important and should be taken into great consideration when considering the proposal of non-historic materials such as PVC columns and aluminum rails on the contributing structure. • New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. (Standard 9) The intent of this Standard appears to have been taken into consideration. • New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. (Standard 10) As the new construction is separate from the historic structures, the intent of this Standard has been met. Guidelines: • New accessory structures should compliment the principal building and should be located to either the rear or side of the principal building. • All new construction should complement the historic architecture of the historic district. The relationship of that new construction adjacent to the significant historic resources can either enhance or detract from the historic setting of the district. Spady Cultural Complex Class II Site Plan Modification; 2008-234-SPI-CL2 September 4; 2008 HPB Meeting; Page 5 of 7 • The height of the new buildings should be similar to those of other buildings along the streetscape. • The new construction shall be compatible with the width of the surrounding buildings. • Materials should be compatible in quality, color, texture, finish and dimension to those commonly found in the historic district. • Roof forms and pitch should be compatible with the surrounding buildings. • The horizontal rhythms between the buildings also should be maintained. • The orientation of the main elevation to the street should also be respected. • The character of the massing should be compatible with the surrounding buildings. Massing means the geometric relationship of the buildings component parts. STAFF COMMENT/ANALYSIS As noted above, the proposed additions comply with the noted Standards above as they are compatible and sympathetic to the contributing structures on the site with the exception of a few details. These details include the introduction of PVC materials on the Susan B. Williams House, the amphitheater, and the Support Facility, as well as aluminum railings on a contributing structure (Susan B. Williams House). The use of these materials is considered contrary to the Standards and Guidelines as it intends to imitate original materials and thereby further alters the historic character of the individual historic structures, and the historic environment, with the introduction of those materials within the property. (E)(8) Visual Compatibility Standards. All improvements to contributing buildings, structures and appurtenances thereto within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. In addition to the Zoning District Regulations, the Historic Preservation Board shall apply the visual compatibility standards provided for in this and other criteria set forth elsewhere in Section 4.5.1. The following criteria apply: (a) Height: The height of proposed buildings or modifications shall be visually compatible in comparison or relation to the height of existing structures and buildings in a historic district for all major and minor development. (g) Relationship of Materials, Texture, and Color: The relationship of materials, texture, and color of the facade of a building and/or hardscaping shall be visually compatible with the predominant materials used in the historic buildings and structures within the subject historic district. (j) Scale of a Building: The size of a building and the building mass in relation to open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, porches, and lot size shall be visually compatible with the building size and mass of historic buildings and structures within a historic district for all development. (I) Architectural Style: All major and minor development shall consist of only one (1) architectural style per structure or property and not introduce elements definitive of another style. STAFF COMMENT With respect to the height criteria noted above, the intent of this Standard has been met, as the structures on the site are both taller and shorter than the amphitheater. The varying heights on the site provide for transitions with the previous approval of the waiver by City.Commission. As previously noted, the proposed PVC rails and columns, as well as the aluminum rails, are not appropriate for the historic site. These should be revised to original materials, such as wood on the Spady Cultural Complex Class II Site Plan Modification; 2008-234-SPI-CL2 September 4, 2008 HPB Meeting; Page 6 of 7 Susan Williams House and a material acceptable to the Board for the columns on the Support Facility. In addition, the introduction of the "keystone" pattern within the concrete walks is not appropriate for the site. The concrete should remain unaltered, or return to the previously approved brick paver walkways. Further, the "keystone" column bases on the amphitheater should be revised to a stucco finish similar to that of the amphitheater wallplanes. The columns on the east elevation of the Support Facility should be revised to a straight square shape from cylindrical, with the capital and base removed, and provide decorative brackets to incorporate the vernacular design into the first floor, in order to unify the appearance of the first and second stories. In addition, the revisions provide decorative fixed, closed louvered shutters on the elevator shaft of the Support Facility. The addition of this detail enhances the design and the shutters should be provided, where applicable, throughout the structure, and contain appropriate proportions to the relevant windows. Each shutter should also be accompanied by a shutter-dog. A color scheme has not been submitted, and will be required prior to the certification of the subject site plan modification. Further, while signage information was included within the submittal packet, it is noted that any action taken on this application does not include signage consideration. A separate application for those proposed revisions to the existing signage or for any new signage will be considered at a later date, as additional information is needed, and signs are considered separate from site plan applications. Lastly, the modification includes a new bench type for the amphitheater. Submittal of a bench detail (product specification and/or cut sheet) is required in addition to a note regarding its finish and/or color. ASSESMENT AND CONCLUSION The subject development proposal will, upon its completion, be of great importance within the community. Any concerns which were raised at the onset of the project were addressed during the conditional use approval process which was required for the construction of the amphitheater. Those concerns were either clarified or addresse t Irthe,rision of conditions of approval. The amphitheater itself will expand upon th f cti ities within the community who take advantage of the programs offere . dinally, the ability to rent ut the facility for private functions will further emphasize the grea portance of the subject applicat n. Aside from the evolving asset this property will become for community, it meets thetinte of t review criteria and has been well thought out. • n- kde:s-es . Based on the analysis ovided throughout the Report, positive findings may be made with respect to the applicable L R Sections oughout, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and the Delra istoric Preservation Guidelines, subject to conditions of approval. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class II site plan modification (2008-234-SPI-CL2) for the Spady Cultural Complex located at 154-170 NW 5th Avenue, West Settlers Historic District by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Spady Cultural Complex Class II Site Plan Modification; 2008-234-SPI-CL2 September 4, 2008 HPB Meeting: Page 7 of 7 C. Move denial of the Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class II site plan modification (2008-234-SPI-CL2) for the Spady Cultural Complex located at 154-170 NW 5th Avenue, West Settlers Historic District by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class II site plan modification (2008-234-SPI-CL2) for the Spady Cultural Complex located at 154-170 NW 5th Avenue, West Settlers Historic District by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation subject to the following conditions: 1. That the PVC columns on the Susan B. Williams house are revised tOvood; C4, 2. That the PVC fence/rail along the amphitheater is revised to wood; LA 3. That the PVC column.material on the Support Facility be revised to n acceptable ma l by the Board, and revised to a hape, cont ining decorative brackets which connect the column and the building;, (rr 4. That the wood style alumin`IJm railings speci ied on the Susan William House return to d as previously approved; yri 5. That decorative, louvered shutters and shutter dogs be installed on the Supporility where possible, and that the shutters be proportionately dimensioned for the windows; 6. That an updated survey showing th dedicated areas be submitted with the revised plans for future dedication purposes; - "")'-' q' ._57/ 6 " \ pe ifica-t`io-n-for- e- - mi a ;-- That the proposed sanitary sewer connection is revised and deemed acceptable by the Ci Engineer; and, g/ That a color scheme r the. entire site be fitt bl ed for review prior to plan certification A G2 / J - Report prepared by:Amy E. Alvarez, Historic Preservation Planner Attachments: • Location Map • Site Plan k • Architectural Elevations 9-Aj)-)TA-1 030-} • Landscape Plan • Product Specifications j 29 6 LP 1 / 9C C2) 1())1`1L w r � 0.71 evyvviA COMMUNITY TRINITY CHILD \ LUTHERAN CARE CENTER rD A ROAD N.W. 4TH ST. CASON METHODIST CHURCH S.D. SPADY - ELEMENTARY SCHOOL > > > > > _ a a a a a N.W. 3RD ST. _ > > a al 4 > a CITY ATTORNEY F .- o BUILDING N cD In �r ro ro ST. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DRIVE o 1z N —tom 3 , — CITY HALL _ 1ST ST. —Th • IllUllIM - M _ z - 7 Z z 3 3=No COMMUNITY mm z z 1.� ..-z CENTER FIRE • M 111111 - STATION fa 111111 �_ TENNIS STADIUM AMOCO Na 1 ATLANTIC AVENUE POLICE SOUTH r— li COMPLEX COUNTY — COURT HOUSE 1 > a v; w w ¢ - a' a a i II (,„ �� --l— SUBJECT PROPERTY SPADY CULTURAL ARTS COMPLEX _ '-___---1 154-170 NW 5TH AVENUE ��t✓ PLANNING AND ZONING 'Qq p--g�P DEPARTMENT dw LOCATION MAP -- DICITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: S:\Planning & Zoning\DBMS\File—Cab\Z—LM 1001-1500\LM890o_Spady Cultural Arts Complex 1 _ SPADY - CULTURAL COMPLEX .. 154-170 NW 5th AVENUE DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA SITE PLAN CERTIFICATION AND CLASS II MODIFICATION 0.6J012 08e11.08 INDEX OF DRAWINGS C,FNERAI ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHS A0.0 COVER DI.I EXIST'G S.WILLIAMS HOUSE SELECTIVE INT. FI.I SUSAN WILLIAMS HOUSE PHOTOGRAPHS . BOUNDARY SURVEY DEMO PLANS FI.2 SUSAN WILLIAMS HOUSE PHOTOGRAPHS DI.2 EXIST'G S.WILLIAMS HOUSE SELECTIVE EXT. CIVIL DEMO PLAN FI FCTRICAL C-0 COVER SHEET AI.I EXIST'G S.WILLIAMS HOUSE FLOOR PLAN PH—I C—I NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS AI.2 NEW SUPPORT FACILITY FLOOR PLANS C-2 ENGINEERING PLAN AI.3 NEW AMPHITHEATER FLOOR PLAN rM �`C-3 DRAINAGE DETAILS A2,0I EXIST'G SPADY MUSEUM FLOOR PNS C-4 WATER AND SEWER DETAILS (REFERENCE ONLY) IIJILAA3.I EXIST'G S.WILLIAMS HOUSE ELEVATIONS AUG 11 2008 LANDSCAPE A3.2 NEW SUPPORT FACILITY ELEVATIONS L—I LANDSCAPE PLAN A3.3 NEW AMPHITHEATER EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS L-2 GENERAL NOTES&PLANT DETAILS A3.4 NEW AMPHITHEATER NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS PLANNING&ZONING A8.I WINDOW AND DOOR SCHEDULE SITE PLAN SPI.I PROPOSED SITE PLAN SP2.I SITE DETAILS CLIENT ARCHITECT CIVIL ENGINEER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MEP/STRUCTURAL ENGINEER EPOCH °JUDSON ARCHITECTURE lEotek Thurlow Kimberly Moyer, ASLA 'I^•Line engineering Inc. (Expanding&PreeeMng Our Cultural Heritage) MOHIIVOT6•PLANNERS•IMAM DE6gN Lond coAe Architecture 1 """i..ry�"'Z...."�"S.^w,."r-- P.O.Boo 3077 Engineering,Inc. 4808 NE 161h Aw �„�w` .�,.. Delray Beach,Florkia 33447 16425 NW 2ND AVENUE.SUITE/402 Oakland Park,Florldc 33334 .... ryyar�—' (561)279-6663 AIIAMI GARDENS,Fl.33169 �envpA e+�ene�e.d.txnew (954)492-9609 ".-."- �« (305)69D-5960 3... � .n, .eer Uc.No.#LA0000952 f LEGEND: E - CENTERLINE CONC..CONCRETE POE[V, i. LR. .5/B'IRON ROD WITH CAP'LB 353 !WO i 'B'C.R 11RINY BOx 1350'PV11 L+o' ,,gQKC yorPOE[WA fOUNB IA. 4 y 3:f'$�r+c 3N4tb L . -UGHT POLE I I I 1,1 .CHAIN LINK FENCE � • WOOD FENCE N. I v __._._.____.....OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES , 0.+ SM.H. . STORM SEWER MANHOLE LOT 8 L #) T 7 LOT 6 LOT 5 at S.S.M.H. . SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE C.O.. SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT .CON8.' FH .FIRE HYDRANT I W.M. .WATER METER _ I 1 I B.F.P..BACkFLOW PREVENTER 4 0000.HAP OKR[V T CONC CV B W :so' o P.PLANTER 0 o L'I I '19 1 11 111 1 1 1111'd o!g Or' eP e, FLOOD ZONE: x A0 'OD LR' �t.Y e..4. , �x 3e.r L'$ ° 7S I' - - v 'b +x ro E a (� c0 9 " A ri 4 7.-.4 0 . v I• V�1 O ^ Ra a 02 o •PORO. Sig 1.1' 6.d oR.& 31 . I s T E^ . �e k . g 1+ 5 'BONO.CURB '9iab' I 1W of --_- I - C 0 N •3. w AA ,K V ,i� _.— R r CURB I'PIP lcOV11[R r e'hP[ I� •� PAM P/ANgo 4 J�1 )'VAU11'CUR ]_vRULY CURB _ V _ • N.W. 5TH AVENUE I1{ PAVLD y1 1I vK C .14iVCER ��� `3'CURB k oVRq 1 V/1K9 (fN W.,t[ MAP OF BOUNDARY SURVEY t RP°° � 00.0.07.01.14 .>r . DESCRIPTION: LOTS 5,8, 7 An 8,MELVIN BURDS SUBDIVISION,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PUT BOOK 11,PAGE 73,PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY,FLORIOA, u°� >a=SURVEYOR St MAPPER #5708 •ao M mR R�io"luirw.awx O'BRIEN, SUITER & O'BRIEN, INC. sURyLy µCpUR1IpCp LAN�DpESURVEYORS 95S N.WORI��M,AYFNU 9�IRE732-3279 iia-2J9R E3315 FEBRUARY 13,2++'111�7777777BBB--- ryy I. . 20' 0 COPtNGH1 N0]O'BRIE5,MU11EI B WOO,00. I AN GRUB NW 0. • 0.253 53 A2 01-2300'A' 1 g CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS g •FOR SPADY MUSEUM IMPROVEMENTS SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 49S , RANGE 42E CITY OF DELRAY BEACH PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA 4p fie: li . I DWGNO: DRAW ING TITLE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONg I co COVER SHEET uJ • • LOTS 5, 6, 7 AND B. MELVIN SURDS SUBDIVISION, I C.1 ENUINNOTES NDSPLANMJ,TIQNS f— I 1 C7 ENGINEERMG MIN = W ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED N.W 2ND ST. ____ C$ DRAINAGE W uj _ IN PLAT BOOK 11 AT PAGE 73, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS, =1 U WATERMDSEWEROETUI.S {A OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. CO CL 1� a — �- p W �..1BG.x - g a �O -NS I MiFo2 c _ _ W Tn U — ��;- MM1.1.1 1 mill - � 3€{ • N.W 1$T ST. I Ci C Cx a .,a x .0 {a Bt E" v i.„ + ; i Z d W i e II • LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE STE PROJECT 06-094 DATE 10-25-06 . SHEET NUMBER µ •• r xnn.r.rt !E ,.,. ,«.�..o.—,.-,..w<•,-, ,.., µ o:»;a", .,. a. n.n»_.<d.,.,w<»rwt R"""pv ,<at...<a.....w,..,». xn... w1 C.�.� ro a n �,.<M<...�� r �rc< xr xr,xx ..x n.,,.,,,46 rim �Y ._,.,•,.,..n.n. a., m»aa..n �'' .. .ar. ,n<..„a,a..a rc n,x A.,r .r...„.„...x •..x..,.„.,, € x a -- a r.,,.•„» M,...n ...a.w,v.t... ».,»... .na„» a<,..W., .•,,.,,a..x„x »a x..ti .»an ..,d ».<.,.•,a.»..., .o» .... g I ; ;: ,,. !E!!!!!! ' n,. .n�,.,M. . .. , , .. x,,. ...x.n.,x.a•a.. <. xr.xm ,,. .x,..xawn . ..w. .. .w. »< ». .. »r... n .,x w M x.,r»..'L"'";,,.. a....,•»,axa..••.r ,.»... ...n r x xroa».., "'":r., roa ::"''' ....r.... `a —ea -....,.,.... .. ....w" xa. ..� aa .x ., .. �x r . r .x n .x..,n �n.xm ..w�xrr.'''.w,'<"xr'".r,,.x....a...,...-.-"—,r, .,.rao ...u w.a.."m�.o.-,-- ay....n,,a.....n.w,.�.onma..� an.aW w.w,—x,wx.o..�,._ .,...roo jI.",r.7q.,a..n,a.. • • WI an,arff. r..t..•r.rc.o..,n .ww,o.mm,ow. ,...•....nx d ,.• •. ..,S.. .w a... «.r.. x..M' no.,r<n KW . o . u., ... t.n,o, x rrc x.< .o.u. x.nnn, r<xoo .a. x nn , amww ` m.,ow %7o. o V ..r x. ,r..,..b ,n,, n • . ,.,.o.< ... . . . .. «w .. .00 z .w,a,.vn ,. » . w r ..x..ow.w ' .w • U. O� U. ...<� w w . _ 2 j U n,..,,.rn..wux.ma.r.co,n V W LL ,a.,cw.u•.u..m..... ..,w.a..v<.a.ru..n.v a.v.,.n.w..,v...nm ...YOxo-..vw:.vwn.'o°ON,r.o-•,.,oww.. ••wwn»ao..v rc vn.wv,... ,•n.n.,<.•ar,a....,x.,,„ r n.•,..a..a.»..,"..a.n.,.... ono.na,. N V 4 a..a..,.......«,...o . w..wv .x a r..x xw,w.. ..,a...ow o,q W ...r...rc. ........ ..n..wo...,,.. .,........ r».x.w.•......,..rrox.,a.. ....o., m , D_ ..<..F..x......,....,., a...t,rx...,.,.....<».n.. . ..,.,.�. .<...,a.a».».<.•...., ..... .�.. } y Cr) ',gm., vm. 2 ,w ......n..a.x..M<,....•r,.r.ro....r., .....,.� .,.t x r.,,.x.,. � ,r.m,.»<ro,...•a, •.wn......o.<.....x.....o.,....o,,.n».x.. :::''' „�...d...;: x<n..rn,...x.:. zz n.,n.., .,<.,.,....,w,... .ow.,a . <.,.,..�...a,a,w.rn .. .»ra..n ,...,.....n.a.».."„q..o.. ' J to no,.." ...•..a..�u,r.a,.u,n......n,..<.„,•<.a, •"•"".oar ... „•.i .,..... .,,r..e v,...,... •.a..»...•w.n.,<.,., w...n,ro.,,.rc.nn. 0 FW- ..r,,.a..r..�a....a.,...,., ,.."„onanr.,..„..,a''° o,.nn ... . .0 .. <.... .aa,a..a.....a.. p ,00.xn....�.I ..„! ra,.r.o,na,x,ro,.,. ..a,.avraooao..... i ,r.v.,., a,.....nU,», ' •...n.,.w,m..,r "c x U .n.ra..a.n,n..,,.t �.w r...xn .,..,,•. .r... .<an,,...,..»n.....n•a,aM x»...,.»..•,..a...a<.r.,...n.r .x.�.n.. w�... C a. »,,.,�..»a.a.,...uo.n.,o.,,m,. EE __,..,...w..<...,w w.a.�.aa,...,..<..nn.<...o+ .,.ti „: • t+ ,• OA i ..� . ..a,�..,..•�a.wa,.<.,.a...x.a.n.., .w..,na.a.<,...a,M..a.....a.,a� I ., a.,...,...,.•..n,..<..a.a 0 ,i� x an.,.»..•, .n".r.n» .a a.rnnxa rxna,a C >mn ..t ..,.w ,w� ,,,>~:.w M�".�:w.,.. �.o".. t � y .r.rw oa r.n",Mrn..,eu., ,.e•w.mr or.u...w,r.n L <. » w,.nnw.n,wt•+u.n .,.o•a.•..,.,. •trx.n,.. '''�.ann.,,ewnnwuc..t . O '��..J �` .r..r. M ° = C u:,""•• .•m• rear.,".".»w»w..x..,n m "••••""nw x F.4 w>w.wru.,nvnc.r... u rween .,,. r......ww..,w .x.r.<'"*.•".u.wM m.wrr.r xu.w.w...m xr,w 1=„i. uo•.w.w.ux..uw..,ewn ..c».r..r.•nn,.m. ., w<n.„-.. n. v.m..w.,auum. vc v. »».n,ar rn..r�or.,n on...u..n,•urrt, court nwx. ..+. .rrv, w...w.<r,a .,na+.."nx x,uv.no-ar,x . "W ,u "` vcrr..r+..wu x,u»•.w.uovn.0 *,.aun...x.r,w.r,u.wvwa `",'M" .,r..,w.,w.a+roxu `w+.,uwn BTE PRO• JECT. m,.•n.o,a„o.wr.xr,.w...o, .,`..a,.,..»nx 06-094 .x..rn.•ru ww.vr„ "" •,wn xn•ua.vau.u,v.n.w• ..n.r.v,nn.... . rm.c,,.vc ,•...a...<t m•ru,u ••wwman,w ro.,..n.,. w..... uu ,wr.,,...w.w.a,n„u.., n,v.nan DATE nn,an,o.mo .,... u,.r•..x........-.w.......n... ,,,,,ow...a.<a. ..x..n<a..,.�,< a ,...+....u..a..a. a,a... a..w,.:.,,w:r. rw 10-25-06 2"1 �� a..vx..•....cw.' wwa a. . w.. »ua.w nrc .•u rwrw.an.x aT. .4 n._. � .•. ,. .. ..or SHEET NUMBER • �a�a r..aw va n.»., µ _ • ' » a .1``" ` ,.. "'•T,•.. ,x< ..a , ::=.•••• r o , wMn . C—1 .. n•rc . . • l �I... + m^ a a OlIx .19. xO KryO h + + + IA (CFI X Iv 1 WAR. GRAPHIC SCALE A FEET g + R) (SSti ry .. , w...N _. O • Cl 01 01 I1 _'=L__'r ....�. __- 137 83 +20 6 Kry I. III N t 1 i 1.. Ili." L+19.68 --- \+20.20 +20.29/ I§ Iil I b Io D [ + I- I N EXISTING ASPHALT I I LEGEND w- ao I la , o PARKING(N.I.C.) z 4 g m ONE 1+ N �L I N P N OI 10▪ .Ilry N , + %.. ° Gry S[. WAS ELEVATION(AGM ^i I. K +20.18 I W�!- e 1 Iu L _}211.16 PROPOSED d'SANRARY SEWER [ 0 ,�o FI --•.'1+2D.10' LATERAL 01.01L MIN.RESTORE I$ i �' IN PRO• DSANRARY MEND GRADE t.I u&Y+, �� 1 /All SIDEWALK.ASPHALT,ETC. I + 1 IAV W MO(OR AREA Ij 11 Ek6TING FIRE SERVICE I I� W SEW ER LATE' TO IX671NG - ��-.. Ss 'RUIN. A I I CLEAN DI I ITO REMAMI II I O _E2 RESTORE SID K.ETC. 119 I 1 KO.OSCD GRADE APPR MATE • • ' / PRO%.E� •'S.75 'O I I.F.•1 30 .....MATCH PROPOSED...... .. ( ON SEAWALL l-.1:1Q J 7 .(NOTIN LKINIC .. •f2036 _ -_ _-. __ „ +20:55 ()T I g &'6RNG Sit R SEWER TO`+ oNS I�_ _..., y d I+ T70 Is[E SURVEY FOR ExnnNDl[c[ND + +, /p� /�//-EXISTING EXISTING SIDEWALK II I' LL, LATERAL • OUT � I PROPOSE SUPPORT' ' / +20.31 +20.47 _-- -_ I +I + DONTRACTO O ELD VERIFY I 12 I IaO.OSEDIRICKIAVEIS PROPAtED-WATER- I/ INVERT AND N•TI YENGINEER. ISEFAKCHIT[cNKAIIUMI I - FACILITIE BUILDING I_ ® SERVICE IS/B')SEE - H.-26S-®-�--- L S - F.F.E.i22.00 ) r-�-y -'BUTTE OSEOi•R NEW SERVICE IF - PLANS- -__ J R/- DEPTH IS ACCC' BLE. t07<l.p FOR DETAILS. I I /` APPROXIMATE ROUTE I __-�MMATCH',OPOSED I N - , / SHOWN SP ADY MUSEUM -spEWA IRKS I _ l (N.I.C.) E%ISTIN el _ I I EXISTING TWO-STORY O I-- I"o . l•-_ C.B.S. +21.24G I CD W .on...No u„L o I[�ti . • -'D F.F.E.+21.2/ I I of N I i ,_ LU + •11, 'y 11� K I. • III! IXISTING WRIER SERVICE I + + + } �Ml p� I li,-.. ._�/J+PRO%IMATE ,T I- I I� dl_I a-�1,�-r: I LOCA7IONI_�20 -} I (n J Z I AM iCH PROPOSED 1+20.f I NACKFLO METER IS) Z q'� 4 + , r1��D BACKFIOW . I I ; I AR • 1' ' "SIDE =INTO I R ENTGRISI POLLUTION CONTROL NOTES: D AI[Il �_ E%IsnNG I dqq REMAIN L.LJ = LyJ n- I z0� 20<l I I. DURING CONSTRUCTION ALL CATCH BASINS TO BE EQUIPPED (J V)IWe�� Lam-_. r • Y WITH FILTER FABRIC AND HAY BALES OVER GRATES PER DETAIL Q N I [` I ( o'. 1 O_..,a_ .m U THIS SHEET. w _Z 1+ I .JI I III ry r In KT m Q 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SILT FENCES SHALL BE INSTALLED CO CY + x� O 0 221 �I ONNEC7•PROPO$ED J AT PROPERTY LINE OR AROUND AREAS Or CONSTRUCTION TO } UJ .- • • ,, ---__- -• i + '1 _ 1. ' _ +I A ATERSEAVICE IS/B') m CONTROL OR PREVENT OFF-SITE DISCHARGE OF SEDIMENT. } 0 LU x - NOG EXISTING.SEE < < Z Ip. {22.0� I 1 EP/PLUMBING PLANS 3. ALL AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE a -0. ! I,, OR DETAILS.VERIFY SI' w STABILIZED WININ A REASONABLE PERIOD or TIME TO J I I DLOCA00N, 0 ASSURE MINIMUM EROSION OF SOILS. LU N W I -I O SUSAN ONE-STORY MS HOUSE I I w A. SEE SHEET C-J FOR POLLUTION PREVENTION DETAILS 0 I I EXISTING ONE-STORY BUNGALOW P 11 F.F.E.+22.1S I {20.Bq TCH PROPOSED I,N I d �1y I We -1 �'.. .m, S EWALK RIYO A Q €B l0 1 7o I ," D __II I x qO�'� + E RING 11 + - O /1 A I I I PROPOSED AMPHITHEATER O,L +20.1 If) jQ II F.T.E.+22.0 P !\ I pc C.7 (Q 1 '119.50' 4 3 ..z . i t 11 I1 7 , I z GENERAL NOTES F" I 19.7 � y'S PROPOSED DRY RETENTION I � ,�( [N Oil D / AREA-BOTTOM ELEV.• 19.0'NOVO �MII .+ ° / III 04 .- [0 Lm0• I.NAVE OTOSE C00CIOSS SLOPED OFM IAOEWALKS10 •A < IN iI xF1°. `r_ �6 ,96 O�• y ^ P m 2.CONTRACTOR to HELD v[KnfRE AND LOCATION or PO O S..I (tatK +19.4 x, + } + + MANG Wino IRIOR tO AWING T4?S. W E -- "- "•R._^'v�.�l'�+'-'5= = -_"�� E:,.-,.�_.�--_. h .. m p S.DOSING NSA'INFORMATON INOWNWtMSIUNTAKEN [� r�Lp m • {KOLA CIS OF DELRAY REACH RECORDS AND SURVEY PAPAK[D N 1 Of OI V' T • IV OIKIM.TOOTAOSNTN.NC.(ORDER 101.]]CEI y�� a - - EXISTING FIRE • + 1• 1 O' �A' 'Nq. ,Ky + + + + + "HYDRANT SEE NOSE 2.ASOVE. II x +19.6 x x I \.... BTE PROJECT K 1. E 06-094 +19.96 '4I - I �!�>Id;• DATE + + • I l�+ 10-30-2006 II'R InK l0•! I I-BDO-a32-a770 �' F.n[)c»S.E-fR00 BNEE1 NUMBER . L..NH.VA AR Ca et IAA.A. C-2 x _ S 1 •` ,c. �° 5 O a Q I rrnuLw. 1-L1 I Jowrsua 0,....°° : J T �i��fi�J�// •[.�.. o o a0'o~ •...amp..,,.-.. Y ;,.,,.D.... Mlerr —1 IRE. /� ttwJ(e 1..�..�[ o 0 0 o .•m•K ••..•••.,o•.••• o� ...YtteFr N•¢. I �• n4n•JO J�ur.�`eV MIOSINI R TNT Arc VMMAI It MTM _ _ I'm 40IMMC M,AfENI TR PAKYENT.SEAT r ��r.•w•��r • TYPE D ISOeRi NO*C TOR W[AONCCVTNrANCXTe OI[ItDCKl IAV[Y[M,Wr<PLtl P.m. * Y t • y 70..r.,.m•A•vw ro•.0:Pm"T•.m wav W.W)gNJONE,.WOS•FO JO.R.T3FAAWJONT TEM MESTAMM) /F • TM �.Ayi nwwmwm•vmu•w.u.i v.um.rrr+r IEfMYEN OATS NOO�JCSCTt IAY[YCNe pAY. t` l� {/Jy,.t.1TiZ7L al. WE DETECTABLE WARNING - TRUNCATED DOME COuc 7E iTcm, 'D'1 CVRB + 4. �j`.;' e, �'M I iTTOTE - •.r.e.. v•rtv+•.r.rw ELM y /,,Y p1 �I r„«c4 I/o S r • lir:AV 1.ELM • t: / t-. T I f.. t•A 1 TYPE'TY.Y.NL .•,.. rirv.rlm , .n WEST • • M1 Ka•••O`6 Ktr.urtl T.EVE v.A. II Y�l r[[t¢.rt.,P c(.,t.wta.4+i PROPERTY//--2' ICA LINE / DEDICATION ▪.< t.( K.to. ..`I nw.(K+tl or tK'A•[.TA••,.PYNiIK I 10'ALLEY I /I 8.85' t"4.` PROPOSED SUPPORT SIDEWALK OETAILI I FACILITIES BLDG. ® FEE••22.0'NGYD • r..0 I �r (EXIST. EX157I I I I ° I lnnc4l WOi.V.4":14F..7.F. CROSS-SECTION A-A IVAIIT TVA HAY BALE DETAIL e.T4....n. .( SOUTH Al.. Tn . ..•.t•.A.w..¢.t n=A.°.t.E L PROPERTY 'I LINEU W < roan aEE� r• I P"T I r I T. ' MI' 1-I 4 LLI • tp4n�n�ED u;r:.m I •i I cc`nt vt�l I 1 SWAN WILLIAMS W cm l'I II I EXIST. ED I I \ Lit. FEE•22.15'NGVD ›. } II III •t•,w.ost.wt..�� �-Ic rto`ir...I n°.I I I Q _ ff Ir raw[ / I, '� 7 EXIST- I CL Q e I it. ®I I .-I Tn & L • II • I1 — rt.IA. C-3 LLI p —y— DETAIN tl—— —0 zrj III 417 MCP U CROSS-SECTION B-B TEATIME se",ma C C ; •0 H-E I 3-49 ZS, •u se Giy • P q a W i • RYE PROJECT• 06-094 GATE 10-18-06 SHEET NUMBER C—3 • ltij. ROTATE rcNa KKt At AMERCE O tr v." x". D]a a+ 1WEACE rtPPRAS:ON COVER AWNED•t 5 • I1 cran�:am"m N(i°„ r"Ortn• I I tunµ.Axt ]y SALAMI 1 M1144 SURFACE 4DA1 ir I I a ALReN•rt: LM� Ov+..C. SLOPE w ro a Y,•xe rcw f00°m A,(u SSS FG /1'PER IOW TAN. OPE PUrt,YKA rcr. F I �r� : :02a� NI OW •rK tD,v vOT�;urui:i iN.I' u:o:in"ero aOL ` ./�.,' ut rR:c4 e•c+m DnuL u Ma:x[u[N,iwn"cnw �o 0,01 SLOPE LOP ri.TO Iuw, KR.D x[Ao[° DA.WAS ]�,, "( 0 GeC h'R r.'SO.C.C. n-I.u.POC ,'-0-1/v"...I 1.-L-0. CEO..o.ON tA.BRAN. s�[g c.c ,DOUBT f FRS,F CON:tiE<nwmAa, twM, TO ¢KA u.:N EI x.samcE m r]�[ OE-5 aL ero,.e NT e•Y fo rc Al vN. 4aswversi.AKMNr u""N:Nn r vA l'- ry „ ccmD.Na ].. BASE u.TEv:n w.0 eC.,.ae """a,.n.No.os. RAT CR wuuw,MC I N.N. LA°n"os°xoi•:vfw a m•C[u AL ..,,RE 1.01E, iiii F .rRa[R,•MC Lr T A„:N:e>'•eo(u . N:,.;N aKi",,vI4nci.. KKR uu LAN.Sum.ENI r......VV. SHALT K COLD n a u[A"vAn iiw PR u.LAmxwD 1-.�a wadr„rt ]. aN1r00esiu.L u..S[uxo•Lro oLAA.K rwa vN„Na.m u"T t•.r Nuco PAC*Mail w n.a Awm 4,e(u[.•wcAu• NOTE' KtlD.rPR co,P[,:.r oa•• CWLACE METE •KO, t(,mas.,v.(OOW,f ALLOKOI ° t. ,(ATE .ZAs w"u R"N�x•rz wsmE r La"TII7 PR s r"' nw uoR: r. axa,M, un.w•u�rc;;C=1 OLAKus ay.snnn• wKRTED SR"55 CA.MALL It MO w CRASS A•us Lot Cmwc Aw COK caw. Ax0 w4,e(wS,ALLtO B•l4NYD Rwe[". PAVEMENT REPAIR DETAIL CU 1.1 • SEWER SERVICE CONNECTIONS DETAIL NW 4.1 TYPICAL CLEANOUT DETAIL WW 5.1 N ' J LL W N•TEv u[rzA w,N t=1.r"tam"c f"wNRMD b,NE rnn� u•rzuaL _ AKTER u[, ° ]1..y.... (iw.°0 r.v c) I"SOT ITT C.,,AC,OA. r•KKxi y W W °" r" " t T nnT sn S,A"6, • •, _ �1TN,7. 0A„v4K•e0K CAM'' W PROM,EMT) ♦uos NtAC S ,N,N Awov.eu N.Na(. co CO . ,N"LK NN] NA..DWI AD,, } 0 0 r+, Raw "OAAK'° .a;,xK.E WN LAP[NO TYPES SOWS. d ,�a tE,ma, J i CM swn• Iasi.LA.,c,um SCAACE SAONEa C.C. uN m K M NO I LK ] . CORPORATION II,REM.. TrAICII • um UKw..TER um ° .n,w[ V v.LK N..r •mo I.w•-r maw * • c ,ww,pp • uN.eo�.v.c.xEEK woo ]n ts.°am.[n+.r a•°a[ �iY1—`_ —ECM ET BRASS cmrm"na slop i.i 4'.T`e.f(r rc•.ro ,N a+•ss rnrm•o°nm� U d ,�.�.."�e� IDa r. N, Ma a,.xD.+,.R Ma Ens') 3 a E i r• �4K"m^' c4e+"Ro CMDTACTOR'PALE c.�u°i NOTES: • I • A p F-] 'tt ius;:c Tr+mtn. 'sADOE[OMMLC S,.A. wMM�w+"rs w,o,N .RA u.w w4L rc v. o2. �+ �'� .A«c xaK a u • "0 w•¢ me SUNLESS SrzIL a,e•oN.VITAS. .� 'il ��o�i ME STANDARD aa°ucr Loi) WOO(La!MALL NOT SC RAMC wD[A Oc1[un. •+•1 C �Lr NOTES: ' N.rzv NM x LDa:Nc NMI<w1 nPR VITA °H ! '. e.°NT"e:O;::wz•�:�i(iir'a �o�.ii:�i r::No°::`:a ix:Nc Loa w,:s(tianrc AF Ol �I Nua AND wYt E II K/oKo ArRA ntsfu"E RSE D. NOTES: T. /".Istue v�°EWEN a a,a.1TPR AND B•AN. �j �. 4,S[Narsa4¢rmc rawc•ND rtuw:Nc r NAME.Y+.,a LEK,.n too.To KIER. P"wa,taM v4K,1D rc RIFT 1. s•NALC KANT waM1D DC AT Kent LAC OA rat x•O"ANT a nO,SoLL . CASK MAC a.VALE RI YAaa D.D.s P uw5W. •• PRIM uiw'v"L�[tOt lAv CcmD ON v4K N.,. ]� s Rs,.wr.1A s AREAS m TTIO we ra[RISK r v uue s.E1 n Nar AT soma wI PR raE xm+"NT.CPRr.nm r, ww rcxo R"aue.rcRvas ""u rc"'• O •C 4 PRESET. r.LAD[ARE rArs ARE Kuw„[O ENT M EST SECTNC LL B[1„m M Ar uAw Aw0 AU rOaxO tN"Lt rc t[VaKO. W 4L soma,e[„LAD u[TE,. wroYi,•DoxoLL6t rvuR(OmE."I LAD,PRESENT H TEST SECTION. R"f"nY"am•e"OIA:OLOGC4,[,twa ° a]ic aE MI!o°° By rwLK van('Wt. W R. I[K MR Cw,CxT a,r rAwDc,U„1 R S.e ,r°,STL[SAAPEE Pow sAALI NOT RC LOC",tO w A,AVM :o Arr r W VI.µ _ 1 E I. w"tea: SOME K cmuccns TO wawC•,vov.crc •"cA a v4Ks,°rc S.0 vuKt HATS AS IKE.•eOK. ICE ome(o•NC ws, \ uutt SDv w4,SE n 4,(D n c.T+"nm. FILL&FLUSH.DETAIL PW 1,1 TYPICAL SAMPLE POINT PW 7.1 1 • TYPICAL SERVICE CONNECTION DETAIL PW 9.1 . POE PROJECT 06-094 DATE 10-16-06 SHEET NUMBER C—4 e.«o-r•.••w•• 41U050N AND PARTNERS ::f 'Q czSTYA SABµ PALM -- : 4 .-.. I a SrWO COLOTLM •+94: -E%ISS .. w•••:1::I'••"w�•" . A. I JOAnCENT PR:.4.W - '7:7 .1/7 �/ NEOGE i0 RE I OucS i0 I I • ... _. ..... -:.?..,.r*";:. P-"��"� "=- �•- J PlantList for Proposed Plant MaterlaI "'••' "�°'•r~4. .,..., � � o.SOTTCa 1'- "a" o,.cN..v.•.rLN.o.. rw.r sy,rcr,Y<• w.o.b AU,v,Asu rsy.rcr.Tu (LardaraB6�snn {r l• ..._-._.__ _• D ramewnaruw.ct uCM«a ,Yw fsfp,fcr.Tu Um Na aUOOOP)53 5 OT oc ED rCr a SOO Ir�`' EXISTING ASPHALT ROHiOPwAYI I AIM . .ni•<omvv..n Y.••paau••.Yr. E 4\, 1 PARNING(N.I.C.) I u^•e^ovm Om •.Y.,ac OC- I N I 11 f m�.f�."'''�r DPN•••• ��Mona a•a]e Oc .«.....,.., • rI�, a4 1 V TV tie . gt..mw• e.ma Tat r• Fr I �,R� Ti \ m Mr....Y �: o' .P�Na :;'°oG e<. r er .�il a I . ie.n..eq.:W.I...n..J..On. • ��?L j l,: •r•2'F.r : au i t .a• '\ .10 w.•H Resat ...........N. . 7 -2.4:t I / IT 120 rdP..n,mn.•a.,r.Lo••.•.<.... ` .tox. E• u cLur, l �� / \�I�.� 1 AH Au'JW vpwcnwa+>++ urc V •i SUPPORT AC LITY •. r o c� P� a o o I o ' .coGO ti� c! rs y« cm•uµ•..m7Gr•Luo••am. xa.x•.J•Dc •t SURF; zoo \ -E%LSNq GOCOfiLNI a c..EX5Tw0 r ~ ,o, •3 .u• q TO PEMAW _ • CO TO iMAANFrr+�PALJA Iwmoce AsaEw'v..u..wuvra subs ems--•r.- _Luz.,-.'.iq t_. ,_' ..-. _:.CDtr • Jr ^\ I I€ i0•`F r��.`-•-r ♦ . O�tt may F Y.Y.. i .l� �� •• ._LIGHT DOLE RYPI ;if fil EF F-4 r S`�V SPADY MUSEUM, I Itndswpe CalGuladons —� p ISSUES o.rt . ; f 1r�•ra�.r'r.�j+l�ry �r, tt (N C) el`,'` In1[ A rolal bl Yar lof.I Efol+y-i:r'•:ti.r' � �aI a-A EXISTING TWO-STORY a it.k.. .11 ar w a. MARV..•pan) .•rca.env 'If.r 1 ��t� va .. to t1 C.D.S.BULGING :♦'MM"""��.. . T���BY�i�W��a�'t i F.F.E.12,.2. - I ' D. _o1,mG.MpounS co.N,«u.•E D.1G..J1 0II el F .Ia ,011MM BEIR1p R.WIRM _ Ate ...61.... � EiaMg myMo4r nuns, 5 E. nnba. Ecovr JOOM j��I�11151111151 ®®� I ii =� f'J �® L.a, Q F. of w• prey l e Mum TT. 0e,0 EVrw.• M I.10.xs ,Da 51 0 / .. _.. t��, b L•♦ J N Tea V•nkuaYa.Y.a•d .400 _ 1 r®gyp' '!_ • Fa' ���1 m I TouI WN•br4MmaP•Y«�«uvdl.IH• ) far Tf M• 7 �79C4�#:®z.�,d�N.��1 �� ,� 1 t :;; xlalrp cpconNp and J. TOW,IYbr MnaaucaN•prONd•d �e.r a w•Ern IOmi�� MIN fa �� S�® �`,•s��►r�. �•�`. y ` K. Tow MM.made la.URFA.14•Duf a ID W'`.._ � � ��x''ff' .�'�' 1 ?I L. Total interior shade r«• rb•O �_�--, 44,00.5 c.rl ,OLq1 ... l�gg,e® , I�}r �y ply t•e:li p1� ' ' ��'-�t li�0. ;®0■f _ U���911i1 QYfG. ®IPJ�VY�W6Y1®P1® v I ` ' • M. ln«.nal awrwna� .a.a•ed a.lr ,3\ ,• ��r ppp���e W N. N mO.r of WApYlmaw—p•«d N•WJO TAG ca.r.e'Ya YIIA1 ® t� �PN` V Jk IIC��rI fitY]�PI `I►♦CwwA`.1 ° I> Soo.oerYVY adjacent IO r•ud•nll I v«/Jf li �„osbiwa Y�FI •� ®.a a.demo ila A raIi+ i• v .�J •• y0.a74 Ei ta. P 0•••J7' 0 Q n oe erm.17:1..r am r•.wpD<•dr•nf LP /' '. a�Pifia..e a` , f•� •♦ ►'� ♦ f o. aawApY«.YD«. , 41 � f,H1 y: f5f ;».. r �• ► "`� zt-u' ,t�'S•rie`r I���l'♦�si�1P f ' _ I r Test rawn•I.r me POVI. - •,ho- U AN k1L AM BUN U .I P N } %ISTING E STORY BUNGALO �,'at ypa� P. saved MIS 10 be �A r;»t• rF,_ r'aF-r• •k. lr1lrl�•rv,�� Ir 13 rrrrj Li'��dalYirW. .E PALM R. D "I, rF r ' rF«!x» 7rr'7 r tr ur? gr ert >.,yp I :. TONlnerne.ae••apn d«pnMan I I o �.►'" • r r• 12 J rr r r 1 ' � �1 z o CL I'I ...... r.L• ' w F rf7Frff T r I r v-'.,llr¢.Fx\? `f �l���rvl7�� I (-). w 1.17:44411407i4414214111444101674M III R—TE..•AMPHITN A.*�ria ri � �`, } 'AO'a u .N. 0 a I ]I/ I I I I I I I III I I IL_ c Q IJ r4. 22.•D ra v vl I I 1 NM 2N0 Si. '^W U r r • RETENM N AREA • I i Soo I FENCE I r _ A Q Ap• e.:.tB1BB6BB&tapl4pl iln�rpAAAAYI, ..,-.. ,I d NG �/-�• --cxerwo SAS..a —ir� I --� • I1 F^-',... •'J TREE TO REIKN I v • ' • I I I scou AS1 SHO] N.W 1S-T 5—T.1 scout: AS SHOWN •Nola:444 wmNioner unha,utility pulpn•M•uG«PFL bozo.,aCM INiii• I I I '!�1 r_� .N Er: /��V-N.,vv.��_�_ • • rM IMpeXon•puipronl.n•D ba w•srod wMaDWAA.V. DIs ma swat <HNO By: / OLANDSCAPE PLAN O cOCA ION PLAN O 0.W00 SCALE: 3/J2••1'-0' `�--�J .T.No: 06412 SNLET NO. • PARTNER I—..rw.e JVOSON ANC,..ww.swS ���//1111U�`\ • ::::::... W.M MOP,ASIA Lends..AMAectoe DSO 92.9669 ri( ... It N0 fA0000952 lobe. — - — _ ` —�Ai�.^"","^ lobe•„ ` .L... . lobe wwww w lobe.lobe. .�..... ...... lobe..- ......tee..... ' .\ `�• �� „^ • .............•. s ..,.�...,. _.__. _lobe �4 poi ry: ,•.; .A. Wit". 51atl.B PIMRNO CFTM 190 STAKING DETAL ' p pAIM PLANTING DETue. • 6 rssws Dalt • t General Notes: 1. All pleat m..dl toe be Florida No.I of benen es given In the current Grades and Standards(or Nursery Plante. • 2.Edition,February 1906.Fiords Department of Agriculture end Con.ln.r S.Mus,DMslon of POnl industry. COCominenl trees e.Ines Mih berk Inclusion Mll not be accepted. 2. Alt plats mated.sloe..u5l.d to Wp•dlon and approrel by the tarulecape ennead el place Cl gnwtn end SlleUIRAL9 Pont Don delivery for conlorm1y to specification, 0. All Vents glue be true to a.piet and wrley and shalt conform to messuram.nit apeUied. a. All plants she)be eooeollonsfy bevy,eymm.blul,light knit end so belted In.pp.ennce as to be sup.dor to force,bnsnchlrp and symmetry. ' 5. Contractor ohe1e coley 5 V.N.S.HINE.(1-0Ip-auAT]Di for.canon of.xloung wily Ynee s6 hour.Odor to • beglming work.Contractor shell verify location of enitely Ones end easemenhplor locornmendng any work. L nvpwl exit: Excavation In Pe vi4Mty Of Andepround utilities shall.undertaken MIh can and by hard.B ne..tery.The Convector.are full responsibility for Ihla work and dsruplon or demeg.to NIli.g shell be rewired hnmedlalely — et n0 expense to I.Owner. 6. Gr.d,B..shredded Melelevu or Eucalyptus minknyn 2'deep.ghee be wed In en mess wonthg beds a.for IndiMduel Ice pits AO trees shall love a mulch Are with a minimum depth or 2',mlxlmum of 0'and a diameter of • 0'.a'around their base.All mulch shall be kept 2'from I.base of ea pt.nl matelot.Mulch bode shell.a , minMvn of 12.Meer Pen plants meesured hone ousde edge of Wee. T. Sod shall be St.August.'Floretam'told end free of weeds.Insect,fungus end disease.Aid with elemtlInp • end abutting loins. I. An trees and shrub..lull be beUllled with asullsbleplaning toll coneleOng of 50 poem)es.end 60.r0en1 .deOue0 compost(Note:Fold o..rvetion and toll an.ly.is may requite a different loll composition lobe X v provided)Al pion!malaria%shalt be planted Mth a minhnum of ale to Indies Incs 011h1 planting.ell erlund W .ki and beneath the root ben.Refer to wanting deli..Planting beds and planting.hall shall.free from road.pas. •9g.or colored rock,building malarial,bebd.'w•ed.n000u.Deets and desire. . 0. N halo All Sodded greet to have•Wnlmun oft'of Online soil es In note t6. 0 Wa wJ ICI All trees snob be warranted by 1.Contractor end Mll be hnl0y end In 60udhing condition or stew growth 0n • year Irom date of fine,acuptence. U 2 F--Q 11.All theca.s,groundoovere.vines Its sod she„be fullyw.nracled for 9(1 days under same tondllon as above. iG' Ow 12.Ae synthetic budp,.ynlMliclMng Or cede orMr•beaksla.nan be removed before any trees ere planted.An ..1 syntneto Itpe Shan be removed from trunk..branches,etc.before Wpedfion.T.lop t/l el any net.,burlap < c Z c sloe be removed or lucked Into). tile planting holebefore Ines are Decked d.Planting s011 to be 9eckl.l Into CC h Went pits by washing In, 16.AllIrees.peen end other plea.shell be'Panted M P thelop off.Ir root bails no deepsr then the anal grade' —I.if, Q e,Inroundvg me planting ere.. z .nes where paved surfaces abut sed Cr mulch,Po Anse grade lave,Or.th a urfaunhould awn. U^ W Q 15 Al planting shell be Installed with fertilizer and/or romliIDnemata al rame or pl.nling. p ,_ 16.AA planting shell be Installed NIaeound,w0hmanllk.m .',termer end according to good wanting procedures. 0' z a • In.lsllalm shell Dldude w.lerng,weeding. fertilizing.mulching.selective pruning.end removal or new.end O (.t_i debit On repute,bees s0 es to present a nest end van kept eppeersnu el ell Wiles. < (7 IT,All le.supe and sod erao shell taw en...mato'Weston system Installed.Coverage should.100%t0 ell d Iandsce.Indsod areas end spray upon public sidewalks,streets end edjaunl properties should b.minimized. N Sodded eon and snruhtgnoundoover beds should be on s.pertls klgallon zones fore neon etydent ly.lem. Irrigation system shell to Waled with a ralnnAlch e.Nc. .- ' 18 All landscape ghee to Wmettenoewl..01. n a. 10.The plan she take pMMCdene.l0ter).plan'fiatshould�thereebe tiny dlecre.n0y bemoan the two. O GENERAL NOTES & PLANT DETAILS oxrc 3/12/07 • SCALE: AS SHOWN ORA.Se CAKE II. ago,Me .90,h0 06J012 PELT h0. . L- 2 v o.»vans. --- AA()CM AROMCTWC NC. EXISTING WOOD POLE TO BE REMOVED ��' EXISTING 6'-0"HIGH IN/A V• TU1.AL rq.ANy{% 088,U CHAIN LINK FENCE(TYP.) iprvoe,..vma. - PROPOSED 6'-8"HIGH CONC.BLOCK I CUNVSTER ENCLOSURE W/TWO PAIRS EXISTING Liam NG 4'MI ' 4'-0"WIDE x 6•-B'HIGH W000 DOORS TOAW.OLA�lg��� FU(TUR6T0 BE REMOVED ISaesv�mc.[o�:vmo-nAc+ id- _ 137.83. W =�� 1' I-_-f—v C—� .— _ _._.—"a!�'._ .—.__— d—0-I-cr PROPOSED PAIR CF S._0.. F."-Ip Tsar .trLT'73.h:.J ec 1 ................. � a�rx� I I - WIDE x 4'-1"HIGH .1 r =� Ta �� I �r-e}" ( .�i'' 9s'-s"T— I WOOD PICKET SWING GATES. .i.:ti�=-.;,?;I.� ;• '� = I REFER TO 10/SP2.1 rc=:+rn::ocrc==n--n[a.r..wM: ..v+7a .:. .i I PROPOSED LIGHTING .. T.........r S. - FIXTURE(T1P.),REFER TO - V. EXISTING ASPHALT PARKING I PH-I •.a.+v.+ (N.I.0.) I. '• 0 -_ - U I EXISTINGE RE LIGHTING FIXTURE *� `� n.�d �o.i n.� ,e*+ �T 7 1 1 TOBE REMOVED AND N 7 EQUAL SPACES 0'• IZ'�0" • REPLACED,REFER TO PH-I «� U uY 0 ra Ig 1 EXISTING TERAllO WALK y.a r z1. �T .ZL-, EXISTING 2'VALLEY CURB •mu•anmv ' a••Iun��II • 'I I•:jt:i+.. .1y" fl 6 �. I EXISTING ADA PMKINO SIGN OPRN VACS m xrws .c,me i S1( —; ' :[ _ c'i:I. q I. EXISTING2"HIGH WOOOE +.+-- •_..:fF' •-05••:CMUNI` • I 3'>p I ." j ��~I ,,ill SUPPORT ACIUTY • " ' o = c= I PICKET GATE , , DASHED UNE -- FI • 00 I• - -. - I•y -5•u-0" INDICATES 3'-5" I (()3` r ALLEY OEDIU71ON .131 �t- 7--j 'Z�' EXISTING V-T'HICHED. vy� �'- '— =1Z` ry.2't rip.3"=:OO5 f^ I 0 I �1 I• I HISTORIC WOOD PICKET - - xW ��' .� E.� T I PATCE TO AN RREFIN fMe.W .R mo m - ', '.y I —I SaAOY MUSEUM(N.LQ.) 1 I PATCHED.AND REFINISHES AS ••w° 'Y..!-.z.L x'" EXISTING TWO-STORY v` REQUIRED TO RECEIVE NEW spy.H;TIp �L��:e'0Pi _,f .'= `'^; Ty c:e.5.SOLOING �; PAINT r. "°` >&' R .1{11 irg-Z F.F.E.+11.2{ �I, LT-"-� 33:�C .L•T { PROPOSED S'-0"WIDE CONC. y„o,,,y A;�� +w+ w� a_ y •-:!�. S{'-82" E%ISTG = 23 �2 (EXISrp, / :f+ �. �r 9 ( ), ) I. WALK w BRILK BORDER. iv ) ',f L 5'-�8 S ! 5 - = Y I PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN . °Arn "' '"" r ''� =-L���1 ® i TO REPLAC�E%ISTING. y�y y �� r •c 1 "fig" - - 1 '�"','� 1•0'-0" '-0'v REFER TOB Sv2.l 00000 c• 1 .."1"�f•.n:rr., I!f•�-- aaRrw un 1 �' DASHED LINE DICATEs • ems-s"1'- [ LI 1 55.RIGHT-OF-WAYG • rya ( ® I N PROPOSED BICYCLE RACE EXISTING OVERHEAD L ' 4II • t 1'�1. I '•'1" 1 11'-•I I ' • W/S SPACES ON CONC.PAS UTILITY LINES COIJZTYARO • q yl.... I [ -. �T 0:. w, =��� �ay�gy P.n I PROPOSED CONC.PATIO ole EXISTING UTILITY BOX M111111111&..... :II, i XB s - AME �'F'�� P�Bm ( I PROPOSED 3'-0" ->r�mn=«�sis T EXISTING WOOD � ".1 --- � ti � ( I • UTILITY POLE(TYP.) "• r y'�' 't4.. ;t Y'•, ....5,"iS1�,/erS4r it�"I`F•ns• t Y .: •• WIDE z Y_2"HIGH ;�,,� ma_ AZ f • •w•y • I SUSAN WI IA S HOUSE R, I. ����ii.II/ vI WOOD PICKET SWING CATE. �y-� �F. EXISTING WOOD , 'I I 1RIWi9143:" Bt9M EXISTING ONE-STORY BUNGALOW y .'` Lai REFER TO 9/5P2.1 wmmxLTr'� a+ur: =.•or.•a� POLE TO BE REMOVED I ^JJ'••. F i. + 15 r1. � .,1;'d ., .....•..•...,....,.•... �c+a_ Vaite. atetn t t a +ufuu•n. • �G. t„Aa u U Z EXISTING PAIR OF T-9" .• PAS 1" i 1 .,,t �' y 2 WIDE z 4'-2"HIGH WOOD Q .: � •«••«•« ]Y ".'�'. 2 ' ' Cr v • QI PICKET SWING GATES TO BE A .,U ;.„�` ,�" «,2..` t: • t...P REPARED,PATCHED.MD % J I :.2."Jr y"' J"."" ' -A •a �� SP2. In REFINISHED AS REQUIRED n' ••, ..1 T-� v pr �F wa . - I TO RECEIVE NEW PAINT Q W jL,..f� - .' 1• +' GASHED LINE INDICATES vj Imo' ;Tr ,,_• �.74-ti Q REQUIRED SETMCK(TYP. t I I 7.1 f a,-:J^"Y`1'"T:4-,w7 M....11p� •.:..� I ) 1'PROPOSED AMPHITHEATER., F EXISTING PARALLEL - }-A 1t F.i p�+22 00 I I I II` r...O i.=h-1A.� 15-0' IT_!•' �I[4 I PARKING(TYP.OF 2) I I 1 I I I I II I I L.JI� ..,-T1'T'`'- �... O£ I N.W 2ND ST. 1 Cl- O PROPOSED SITE PLAN® I �� I 1 ()SCALE,ran, I �"1 L— IMMUM �� RCAIa AS SHOWN _ wren(In,VI. N.w 1ST ST. •1-� o re. ANS Ill a ' J alma NO Y.INN 063019 OLOCATION PLAN( mist NO ()GAUD NT() �ll� SP1.1 SLOPE I" Mao w Q 8 CONCRETE Illil SP2.I �I BL"OCK WALL W/ t I'I1 \\` 3 STUCCO FINISH EACH SIDE(TYP.) • DUTCIDF flllll INS DF IIIIIII CONCRETE TIE BEAM e. SEE STRUCTURAL DWCS. CONCRETE SLAB II,',II 8'CONCRETE BLOCK WALL _.ter u� WI5 8"TEXTURED STUCCO PER STRUCTURAL (TYP.) -".�",,,,,.,, q E IpI FINISH EACH SIDE TYP. b' PAIR 4'-0"WIDE 4 CHB" C��1 (IIIIIII © ... 47,=T-21. HIGH WOOD DOORS(TYP,) II 11 �'�"w 9111 IIIU IIIP '�17• :7.a F'`' .ti1';:5\ 4"S10000 REVEAL, , 911,11 �'.— 'i ~?>.'_±+i(i� —!`"� E4•CONCRETE SUB PAIR 4•-0"WIDE 1111111111111 IIIIHuIIIIIII!jIIIIIIHhII . •.. I1Y ;....; _::..; ( ,..:,.....c ,oiiiiiaia IIiii, :.)'j�,", Y.INI A liT�ri(7t ,. r 2 4'STUCCO REVEAL 6"CONCRETE BLOCK WALL 4•'STUCCO REVEAL. ' ,0"CONCRETE BLOCK WALL - "-ii=""II°il°li"-it°11=i1=�1�°� "B88)HIl'1"II" A=11=11=11=11=11=1I— SEE DETAIL 7/SP2.1 W/6/e"TEXTURED STUCCO SEE DETAIL 7/SP2,1 W/5/8"TEXTURED STUCCO nlTi llti�=If. "=B ® (TYP,) FINISH EACH SIDE(TYP,) FINISH EACH SIDE(TYP,) �I ILTII Ill. '='i=l�CONCRETE GRADE BEAM .� n. _„1. n6_ STRUCTURAL DWOS. 0 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE PLAN O DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE ELEV. O DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE ELEV. O DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SECTION SCALE,V4,1-0. SCALE V4•"1-0• SCALE V4'4-01 NORTH AID BOOTH ELEVNHONB WM. SCALE_8/4•.T•0• P.T.WOOD FRENCH GOTHIC POST CAP, PAINTED. SIGN o- OM ' P.r.wooD KEYNOTES . �0" S"�_4 IR I ' '.`1 i� POST, PAIN ED. IFLj'-11� 1"RAISED I.CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SHOP ...D v 5,_3„ �1I�c'cI ALUMINUM DRAWINGS FOR ARCHITECT APPROVAL ■4�TAu an :I1 s•R:T=II� PRIOR TO FABRICATION AND p "7 PREFABRICATED BICYCLE II,EI LETTERS(TIMES INSTALLATION. 6"CONCRETE BLOCK , • _ RACK BY CYCLOOPS, II, NEW ROMAN) EMBEDMENT ATOUNTIND AS _ _ 2.THE SIGN SHW.BE DESIGNED 70 ,p SHOWN,INSTALLED PER . Ij�I 2-I/2"RAISED WITHSTAND A PRESSURE OF 50 LBS. 5/8"x4"P(ASTIC PREFABRICATED BICYCLE V 7 4/FR'S RECOMMENDATIONS -,-t- ALUMNUM PER SQUARE FOOT, • STUCCO STOP MOLDING•--� RACK BY INSTALLED PS. D V. .P CONC.FOOTING PER III'® ( ) ^��• wn INSTALLED PER P . .I STRUCTURAL LETTERS(ARIAL) 4. Mm'S RECOMMENDATIONS J 5/8"TEXTURED Q. Ss T( i;� "REMOVABLE CONCRETE SUB. '+ STUCCO(TYP,) } T. .E T t 5 II® ALUMINUM STAINED FINISH PER ARCHITECT P '.._ - LETTERS(ARIAL) '•r - - IN LOCKABLE • ®-ill." MESSAGE BORD '9911 RAIL SYSTEM WITH PLEXICUSS )K O STUCCO REVEAL DETAIL O BICYCLE RACK PLAN O BICYCLE RACK DETAILIf linii PAINTED.T. EDo B•ACKGROUND, SCALE S••1-0• SCALE.VC-1-0' 7 SCALE 1/2,E0' < U & J 1,1 `-` H a I 5•_D• I << W OMONUMENT SIGNp o SOALS•Vri1.0• g P'. ilj Y a Cl, 0 NEW 0.T.WOOD FRENCH d) E%ISFC. HEY( EX ISTC, NEW P,T.WOOD FRENCH E%I NEW EKI�P GOTHIC POST CAP, GOTHIC POST CAP. e �' PAINTED. PAINTED. PICKET SWINGATE TO PICKET SWINOATE TO �j (1 1 ^ 1( ''1 "1 " ( � • MATCH EXISTING FENCE, 1 1111111111111111111111111111 � .1, 11� MATCH EXISTING FENCE, L~' I,L 1. `',14..II.',r IIL 4..l IT 1`!:`I k i; ..\II : .: :" %`I� ": 4"L{ PAINTED. / I PAINTED, a _ _ , ,, II' 1 , , NEW 4•X4"P.T.WOOD 5 • , .. NEW 4"%4"P.T.WOOD DAIS FRENCH GOTHIC POST, AS SHOWN PAINTED PAI NCH GOTHIC POST, 9u...•Y.). 4` PAINTEDEXISTING WOOD PICKET ivG • /—EXISTING WOOD PICKET VL i iiil FENCE TO BE REPAIRED, ' __ ______-� V-_____ F`__ q ` - FENCE TO BE REPAIRED, T:414VI• AMBI' PATCHED.AND REFINISHED 111 _t__..'_________________ _ PATCHED,AND REFINISHED 4 O•_2" p AS REQUREU TO RECEIVEAS REQUIRED TO RECEIVET�rT w •11 +-T NEW PAINT �I'I 'I NEW PAINT ".U. MOE 4111114 KP e WOOD PICKET GATE Co WOOD PICKET GATES O SCALE V2'a-0' SCALE,1/8K-0• S P 2.1 JMDBON AND PARTN0T8 = l _.r.,• ....• ---T -1 w -Er. -'J 1 I 4 ..�aj/ TO BE REMOVED AND EXISTING WOOD DOOR TRIM a ,..... REPAIRED WHERE LEGEND ,.m.,.„ �j 11 I IN KIND IF TOO REPLACED EXISTING WALL.PARTITION 9 I D DETERIORATED -- OR OBJECT TO REMAIN I OETEWORAIEp TO REPAIR �(TYP.) EXISTING WALL PARTITION EXISTING PLYWOOD TO BE REMOVED TO OR OBJECT TO BE PORTION OF EOSTNG'HALL ACCOMMODATE NEW WOOD DECKING DEMOLISHED OR REMOVED TO BE ACCOMMODATE TO r,00s EXISTING WINDOW TO BE ACOONM000 NEW FRAM EXISTING W000 WINDOW AND TRIM TO REMOVED S'-B'W000 DOOR&FRAME. II BE REMOVED AND REPAIRED WHERE i1 • FEASIBLE.OR REPLACED IN KIND IF . EXISI NG DOOR AND FRAME REFER TO AI.I A TOO DETERIORATED TO REPAIR(TYP.), is LU TO BE REMOVED II REFER TO All Y. a ' 1 ti.,r T„I„a A EXISTING NNY1.SIDING AND W000 FRAEXISTING WXKX)DOOR SIDING TO BE REMOVED TO ( M)TO BE REMOVED ACCCONER TO AT NEW SIDING, RO st an 0 SELECTIVE EXTERIOR DEMO FLOOR PLAN rwnrAu an SCALE.VA••TO• A wt..>.* WV In O Q pa I CO U11 Q0 q J X I: N; >. < OU iWlex NATr 11.16.00 ruts Al KNOWN PAW PR VLIA.C. axc9 m AMP 0,ST I. JP.la OOJ0T0 MY. D1.1 • ItIlD PARTNERS KEYNOTE$ NOTE /i \\ * ,� 01 REMOVE EXISTING INTERIOR DOORS AND THE CONTRACTOR IS HENCEFORTH ... FRAMES. STORE DOORS IN DRY,SECURE INFORMED AND MADE AWARE THAT THE LOCATION AND RAT,LEVEL POSITION INTENT IS TO PRESERVE THE HISTORIC �'' r-TT----� 0 "©"O=I FOR POSSIBLE REINSTALLATION. • HINDSTRUCTUREO H THE SCOPE OFO Z�+7+���r�' JV` ANO RESTORATION.THE SCOPE OF WORK .m o�+ L� O 2 REMOVE EXISTING PLUMBING FIXTURES, IS LIMITED TO SELECTIVE INTERIOR 1 --- .1 �, 1� Ij1 © © I 7 I„ O PIPING AND RELATED COMPONENTS. OEMOLITON AS INDICATED.THE '~°" `���M` 7 a II�I I I`O HD Ili CONTRACTOR MUST USE CARE TO ONLYR EXISTING 6@��� y�I I O ©I �i I I 05 REMOVE EXISTING WATER HEATER. STRUCTURERRIE ITEMS0 INDICATED TO BE —�/ I �- -�+,-- CI�. O I 0 Os REMOVE EXISTING CABINETS,MILLWORK REMOVED. EXISTING STRUCTURE OR I " ,(_ J-1 AND SHELVING. ITEMS TO REMAIN SHALL BE LEFT IN THE W D'^ L�I�yI I`,-0 ' B P 0 / CONDITION FOUND,TO BE PREPARED TO 1 J...© O�F:1 , B o / © REMOVE EXISTING INTERIOR WINDOW RECEIVE NEW FINISHES UNDER I I rI- o T TRIM ONLY.DO NOT REMOVE EXTERIOR SEPARATE PERMIT. ................. F,� �LJ�__ - J_Jti--'T �— Y� E__ '�"-- '-_ - _ _ I TT-- t TRIM,WINDOWS OR ANY COMPONENT �.[/� _ II I WHICH MAY COMPROMISE WEATHER LEGEND I W vo 1L T. L____r B , �LI 7 SECURE LLOCATONA DTIGHTNESS.STORE I FLAT.LEM IN VEL EXISTING WAIL PARTITION IpPI Q��{ I I O� POSITION FOR POSSIBLE '-- OR OBJECT TO REMAIN Ip--'SO c-- .,© h �o-1L R NOT TO EINSTALLATION. • EXISTING WINDOWS EAND SILLS. EXISTING WALL,PARTITION ,,,,,,,,, WW OR OBJECT TO BE o-111 A 0 5 2 Q I B (7� 5 ��j j o7 5 © DISCONNECT AND REMOVE IC ELECDEMOLISHED OR REMOVED I -"rip: I l:�-I I L AND COMPONENTSRFS,DEVICES.PANELS *'�I EXISI NG DOOR AND FRAME __.u.__ 11_ d>j o TO BE REMOVED .�� ? 07 REMOVE EXISTING CROW MOLDING. d 6 'T'— 7 �" 5 BASEBOARDS • E NOT TO DAMAGEXISTING WOODS t__ rs�r 1 STUDS. © DEMOLISH EXISTING INTERIOR WOOD STUD PARTITIONS:INCLUDING,BUT NOT R.. wax • TO,CROWN MOLDING, 0 SELECTIVE INTERIOR DEMO FLOOR PLAN® BASEBOARDS AND WALL FINISHES. . SCALD V4,1-0' 08 REMOVE EXISTING HARDWOOD STRIP FLOORING AND SUBFLOOR.USE CARE NOT TO DAMAGE EXISTING WOOD FLOOR JOISTS. auvrru. 'AN © REMOVE EXISTING CERAMIC TILE MO SUBFLOOR.USE CARE NOT TO DAMAGE _ EXISTING WOOD FLOOR JOISTS. • 1 �- _____ ___ _ H REMOVE EXISTING CARPETING AND ,r\w� vAn TJ r----'��-TT- 0 SUBFLOOR.USE CARE NOT TO DAMAGE .�-Z__ -_I EXISTING WOOD FLOOR JOISTS. j I I Q REMOVE EXISTING LINOLEUM TILE AND I I �� 1 - / I EXBFLNGR.USE COOS NOT TO DAMAGE / I5 I EXISTING WOOD FLOOR JOISTS. 111 ti Fn ® `I I 1 =_'I L1 F REMOVE EXISTING PLYWOOD FLOORING. II 0 r 11 © USE CARE NOT TO DAMAGE EXISTING • O R 41 I©I I I WOOD FLOOR JOISTS. .� I U I LL =n 1- �L_JL _ Jti_--__ L JL © REMOVE E%ISTINC SOFFITG AND ATTIC--y„__S-_ ir____T-© ir___1j }I, REMORATIVETRIM. 8 t (n0 ACCESS �f-1 II �L__J� �III (� UATTIC © REMOVE EXISTING BEADBOARD CEILINGS, g mL (TYT') i L_J �I i I L J (n'P)ACCESS I WOODDRRAFTERS. DAMAGE EXISTING J QW 11 II ` i . ® I '� I I IT ® SELECTIVE INTERIOR DEMOLITION si I! F. I r l I I I I I I UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT,PERMIT X�� I I NO.07-115757 O coF -_ L j -'- L G. y F-0 OJ E V'� gwW OSELECTIVE INTERIOR DEMO CEILING PLAN ® B,n TL,SAS WALE.VM-0' .vu AS SHOWN AAA,A Fr.VLIA.C. may SY. AILS flat NO L.b CBJOta Mr Mc. D1.2 tea\\I'II, /I I5-9}' 6'-I• I;• 8•-It;• D• 6•_D• Z•2'-G•4• 21'-I. 6: NEW ADA COMPLIANT CONC.RAMP, 6'-0' I3'-1• S'-0• STAINED FINISH N NEW WOOD STYLE w _ pT� m ti, ALUMINUM RAILING. •� e \ �� O O ,� PAINTED(TOP.) —• 5 kry,f /// © NEW CONC.STAIRS, _-OO .O% I Q a • STAINED FINISH I UNISDI + ACTIVITY/ V© i0 (IYP,) r O KITCHEN., r RESTROOM p COMPUTER RM, PORCH q b NEW Ad1 COMPLIANT 0 y.u� DAM I. ® 4 ® Ell ® r....-.--' ALUMINUM HANDRAIL. • m I . PAINTED(ttP.) 1 4 08 I it CI A/C ii i%.i... 0© r ,�' V.:.�+ arrru. oAn CLOSET �- I ® If M ® I AA A I ACOUSO-SEAL ASS / !I 1 OPERABLE PARTITION BY • I, 3'-4�1 Y-0 4-B}• 3'- MODERNFOLD W OE /S-0•WIDE CD, BI-FOLD DOOR ON HINGED e . OFFICE . Q A I JAMB TO MEET YIN.UL o, TMq A;ay.. DAM t� a APPROVED CLASS C FLAME FO . SPREAD RATING,FINISH TO q ,ACTIVITY BE SELECTED BY ARCHITEC O -EXISTING W000 ROOM - WINDOW PAINTED, MO '® i� - REFER TO AS.I • I Fn cram • v I EGFNt7 Ix M O O —� o EXISTING WALL,PARTITION J OR OBJECT TD REMAIN 14� Z . 10'-1• bp'I � 23'-7}• 7'-D• '.Y. NEW INTERIOR PARTITION U 16'-2' a-O 32-3• . NOTE Q�¢s J G. EXISTING WOOD WINDOWS 7 g ...cc THE EXISTING WOOD WINDOWS SHALL BE FF•• 11g-D• �, REPAIRED WHERE FEASIBLE,OR J€► NEW WOOD DOOR, REPLACED IN KIND ONLY IF IT IS TOO p<q 0 PAINTED,REFER TO DETERIORATED TO REPAIR USING THE 3 B 61 Co J N SAME SASH AND PANE CONFIGUMTION y 333 U. AB.I(TY ) AND OTHER DESIGN DETAILS. THE O (' OFLOOR PLAN NEW CONC.PATIO, ARCHITECT SHALL PRESERVE SUCH !GALE V4,1-0' STAINED FINISH FEATURES AS THE FRAMES,SASH. P. PANELEDHUNTINS.EAOMOLDS OR DECORATED Cl) JAMBS AND MOLDINGS.AND INTERIOR K AND EXTERIOR SHUTTERS AND BLINDS W WHERE APPLICABLE WHERE REPLACED IN KIND,WINDOWS ARE TO BE DAWN ALUMINUM-CLAD WOOD OF THE SAME CONFIGURATION, WOODORS AARTIONC ,, Wm, AS SHOWN NDO TO mow or VL MATCH IN KIND THE EXISTING W000 Win AMS PANEL DOORS USING THE SAME Clan 1q DESIGN DETAILS. THE ARCHITECT SHALL PRESERVE SUCH FEATURES AS 1I,w WOKETHE FRAMES,HEADS,HEADMOLDS, PANELED OR DECORATED JAMBS AND MIR KO MOLDINGS.AND INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR SHUTTERS WHERE APPLICABLE. A 1.1 • 7" I2•_3.' 4" 5'_3" N 4'_6'• 9"_2.9,X_4,N' 4._5' 9'I / • ADA COMPLIANT STAIR W/ 4'-7" 4'-7" 10-B" 3-4.2' ,'-6" 1" ".- I- ' STEEL HANDRAILS(TM) IT / 9NN P, ALUMINUM WINDOWS(TYP), I +� E�•. 0 Q ••�.. REFER TO AS.1 ®� ;17-'7 ¶ WORK _ DEFACE I b ' L AREA n N v p - ® PEC�4•. II�_I.. v> iv N S'-7" S'-0' I I 4. ipi OFFICE ="I RECEPTION CIS l' A. Im4 � i I L 4'-54" •-0• 5'54" •-0• 5'-54" 2'-0'— 5'-54" 2-p'I 11 ————J THYSSENKRUP AMEE 21 HOLELESS HYDRAULIC Q�� DATE16'-5" ELEVATOR W/TIMECLOCK �, 12'-3" 4 5'-9" 9' AND TOUCHDAD TO BE INSTALLED BY SERVICE DEPT. 29'-ID" elwPrru• Pan O 2ND FLOOR PLAN • SCALE.V4•"f-0• • / 4'-5" 9' MECHANICAL UNIT ON A MEW* DATE 15'-ID'• J'-4"B" 6-t" S';3 4" ADA COMPLIANT STAIR WNiN CONCRETE PAD PER STEEL HANDRAILS(TYP.) / �: MECHANICAL UI OS h O6 S r _ �, m STORAGE ELEC./TEL. A/C + X ® aooM cLoSEr w J m h nl ® ® U RI OMA • �7 VENT PER MECHANICAL Q I [Inc) „ Y •I e Iaal tl f ! _,� 5� 0.0 V Q U> 0 CC _ Fj •I ELEVATOR 0•• CONCESSIONS-1 MEWS WOMEN'S MACHINE RM. . •' J ® RESTROOM RESTROOM ® ®q� „ b C LL h 9 ® COVERED )Tf\\/ t \\ 0 , PORCH 5 , 1.. il. m 04Ti 8 ePu, As eHowR h; ` THYSSENKRUP AUEE 21 mom~,� -: !_61 5'-I14'. 1 6J 5.-114" 61 y_II1,. 1_6I 5,_IIL.. 5._.. 9. PNn I T AIM 2 1 JJJ 2 S 4 22 33 } 22 HOLELESS H//YDRAULIC Q�ep T-I AND ELEVATOR W/ TO BE CK ar.w D6JOC 29'-10" 777 INSTALLED BY SERVICE DEPT. Sr o 0 1ST FLOOR PLAN !O A1.2 ALI.V4,1-0• J.08011 ARCKTECT.111 PC ................• rpos a.m.. SVOTI:jecT'sf-EGIK PAINTED 12.-0.• 12.-0" _._•:.________.........-- --"--"--- '--'''---7 1.? 42 . .‘ --'. a'•r o•r IpPr?i .r,,,---:-0-,-".-•9-vi---•. -.. —. I 2 , _ 7 i , s . '?• • ..: ,• .' • _ .- _ A Y. UIP, 7.a1...,..'....-„77..1...,1r7•% ..,." .........,••• '1 ). HANDRAIL(TYP) -, '-',.4, , 11,. •. ..... .•.'.'. 4 STORAGE ADJACENT SUPPORT FACIUTY I ilt,', i. Es_. . , I Mr- yiNEEtC4.411LIOGATp1,•. , - _ ...- • .Wi 3.rx4B"c DR n.coit - , . 1 4:.-0- • r. .SP,ACE,(rY.P•OF.21. -TSE CGT VDT 7.13P CHTTE g a• 13.-9. I P 1-CT'... E ff, Tr I Tr----- j "; !. 32,T 11.. 1,1111111t1,1 II 111111111M .. T $ 6.. 1 Le 1.1f,..,Ergr, = . ., rim_ ................ ,,,,.1 tp. BACKSTAGE STACE • MI CM 1 1 11T-711-t Polluiveliglos - lowiA. num 1 1 II .,, •E L 1• 1 , I :1 . . COURTYARD. • • /11 4 SOD OVER GRASSPAVF_2 T, "''- '4-....-I --f-,1 I : • ' • ' • • • • • POROUS PAVNENT SYSTEM 1 1• , E -1 • I .' I • •=acElgiV;:.:., 1110_ . ,1- -, .., , . ,' , . ,1• -.(FOP,OF,la),.,.,.,•, • 1 CURTAIN TRACK !I I r---w, „.._ . E ,,,,,,.,, ,„4„„ ..., 11,. ...,...,.,.,..., 1 .. • , rri, _ _..____-----iiiRICITPEVNSAiSicIVETc0,SE =1 r" 1 1 — .' ., 1 • ;,.`_I, I r I r• rg 2,._,0. 0.. MN ABOVE(TV) MO • E . , I ' l I - 1 o 12 . 1 -1 1 1 '1111 OUTDOOR STAGE L b 407.)MIIIIIIIIIimmem ,„IM rla I 1 Ulu I i 1 - j'.. CURTAIN,N I.C. . lig! W '' - -2E'L.: •-.1 • '.._j • _ .. ., - . cpCRE,,T, 1p,4/SIMULATED A N(TYP, 11/0110TTAL 00111 . XJ U.N.0.):CONTRACTOR TO 4 sueuir(.3,)SAMPLES FOR — T. I ., - I. 1 74 kl ,f1,4241Ft- ARCHITEC S APPROVAL PRIOR TO FABRICATION AND o INSTALLATION r9...., jo....7..-"a`'"'"r"Tr II.TTITTIrtolii,i1,,i Fp , -,*-.- -,---, - • , ;:gr ' . r , - A ray.toNs DSOS CABLE PASS(TIP. I OF 2)_....................1„...- 1 _ 7-0' I-I' PVC PICKET FENCE IV/GOTHIC POST CAP.PAINTED(TYP.) (7)FLOOR PLAN 0 \,...:} 11C412.V4,1-0. n cr ui t- 5 <z 4 g 1::a- g E cr % I Z i 0.411. sou.s. A8 SHOWN MOW or.VI. MOO 06 AM8 CUNT MO. JP.NO OIJOI *woo A1.3 • i IWR�SF�IRERMIM ~P r<r 111Z' • . 8 �� — atoll �� r A980CNi�NC 4 ��9T �,.0•�j4 Q owl. Wes[ ��_ S �'.,ewauAias ® t sir RAKR. ��I y°• Teo a�,a e,w tl ova/OP •4,, �,0 I Tome NH4 • 03 O ,4J �� I] I—II RYO wm"Y."�o • 0 rL—O WALL LEGEND !.SEGEeo71fa1 O ., •�T �y pXUIB?T n r.�p• cm c O �., O , .D. }r• WALLA,DOORS AND WINDOWS • O✓rr•.HEN .. Y. it p POOH @' TO DE RGIOKD.. y O O •0 '! O �1 - OtL�.ra /�` n % EMOTING WALLS TO ROMAN b F ® . •T.T.�•r.•. T,, k� I�.T ��� elk, N.NI tdRRLCiW a -O NEW r CONCRETE DLocx t e NRFcra,MIDI Q'l •..Ia ... O.O `yl�fli�� ��I O llirdi\"ir/• Ti.,p v t�rl.1 Ii Is. - Y • FI` WALL W/STUCCO EXT.TO HATCH[NlerNi. - er _O.M'NIERIDR PARTITION Q uw,t I IO� lin— tI '`p I�i 1,O 110 i O mn DRYWALL•DATNRDCMS1 ��W, 0 i� y\s J tt rK rEY w DDONeuD a WARMS/ F O '0 ..L!Hui r. 1{7� C e ss Y# i NEW NA LLD.INF6..1.LLV EXTERIOR STUCCO ,..1' 1 • ...• .....- !ryy AND I.eL DOTAL RIMY.vter R 1__."•Oel-D OP.KR O 0 �' p.O rR na p• �_. ..�Qj u Lj\0. `��N IMPERIAL DO.M W,K[I•!R RADTRR 6av:.cw O �- C� •l B m1.aNOR.Lm..eom.a AT �� amw a LTw�i aura soRFI�NIe.+ OCK -�rso.Dro•Low WALL PARTITION .• PATIO; ' j " � To NATO/uaerrxL en MAILS e aET..a. MIDI RENOVATION q FOR nRD.MTED WALLS. POMP PRIM D µ�.IPAVATOWR , • 'y QWI I .. I NR RATED ENLL .w• !r R T •en Pa �� FLOOR NOTES WADY HOUSE NR rvaro uuu �!� _• _ �— A (7 'r=` MUSEUM ALL REd ip D RATED WALLS WLL HAK Q O C.M ADOK ® PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN 0 ,:r'.'=er:.'•"• PHASE 1 DASHED LNne,ee[eNEET ASAro FOR nT-e a CONSTRUCTION IQ w'.ram• .•. CI..I,�.• r " . l 0.•.:.......... • D•.Ie• t r.,r Me'' •.. 1 , ..1 4 r.r 1..'r.r. .P• '•,.e`i��: ❑".-,.F",.w -- •a•. moon AREA CALCUlA110N0 .a F rn• • r.P • JP ... ©"•• •"••,. a EXI6TG GROUND FLOOR AREA(UNDER AIR) 960 6E. • R .an w • BTORAGEANDER NEW!STAIRS 30 BF, • '� Y4 ••,,, 'NOW ELEVATOR 56 BF. ID * T"�°� TOTAL GROUND FLOOR• 1,034 OF. • O -I p 0 ��'w AID( • 8 EXISTING MGM"FLOOR(UNDER AIR) 010 OF. • • ,.•,• 0 I — IO-.__ •r .- 1 �+, ❑ 170 RN PH p�JgY BEACI(14. UPPER LANDMG(EXTERIOR) 45 BF. �F* • O O ® a •�E�+1,•,�� µ TOTAL'SECOND FLOOR. 055 0P. r}' } O'-'-' 1, Q 4., [35FER.4. a.ue .4 • , TOTAL UNDER AIR. • . IMO 0F. [-I w,r,• �"�I 1 r)4tBI1 E4. �H�rc a 'I a 0, .�,.,o...n.•.. POT IL•POOL 'RANO""`M Y V 5�' •4 GENERAL BOLDING NOTE& SIT e3 q� u rtRM NRMo MARnarfR THAT Twe MI.it NO.nAORu.aVTR AU. • PTn t �_ POD.Doc. O° °•ram•.+O 1'Tr®r�P -,il k Ave •: 9R R!OWI.D•@R6 Cl A g000• NT.ALL C e MNNO AIISDIGNOI OYER W AIS TTK } -!YP`0..... y,•,R,.L, I (1 or b Cr CONetIR1CfIW ADD OOOTNCY.AL CONTRACTORS e,.,, DO WEIR WAX N T-- . _ D.O.OP W10E UN ILL ArrMu .came AND IRed.URIC.D. ti f` D°S� 1W L i f. . RAIL 31 THE COMRACTOR WALL KRRY ALL CONDITIONS Ne DFIENIO E AT M NJOeR[ F I. ��, O�. • • O�y •_ F ' © ��'O < PR/OR TO COI4NCNOSICIK M CONTRACTOR SHALL R1EAMr ALL DIODRRARCI. /,• COItRNCNT.WOW MO ENRAb COrOR1OD TO M ARONRDCr F1IC1¢r0 • O> .... T.... S V 1 , Q ® `r•. TQ/ 0\�,�1 ..Q_t [C: -�4 fl MSE DDculDrte, WTIR/1DRe o eeR.Ia•ARE DE PROPERTY LI'M •! ' q ... �E O y., ♦per..';•a • T R 1 4 • GI S)DOCALA TOE D WELD VERFY ALL IONSI• d'1'ROD�tKED WrM01R eMTleS[D r/ .... IS •O Sri -y..t A -�. -4U�� ._.1,li l•,�I,:a:0F,Tre.Y.. O a uwR,°""` E9I in Is GI 5S/ALL AMA • 1 Ip'M 1P TRNRo CONDCCT DDNOIITION OPERATIC.AND lent...of DSDRe To • .,A,-- _ DRNI'!FRNR'V1 NIER FERE NOI NTH ROADS•STREETS.WALKS.ND onaft CLOSET 'w -__... 4 - - .^ PROPOSED ADJACINT 060.,o040-AC OR I.[D FACLRu NC .lO OPERATIONS. O y(] I�1 O°0_0... _._,...�.•�_^` S _ R.00R PLANS ID DI2ROen.CONTRACTOR R REe 2SEILE POR R,081 NR l.m ALL D[8IS. `J ``ryw~'ryry/' • ROOTER AND OTN�R MAMMALS'RENLTW MCP DD1CLMeN ORRATCNA • p -AS-SUII.T PLANS V rNT[I NO ATTDTt D HAD[W IIQeE mamas TO SNOE MIRY rTw TO ter on.uw ITN RA . El II'RovID.CONTRACTOR EMAIL HER EDE TO DEIERD0 010*1 OR .NN opRPo. MR it...,H NT N541ER ITQU NOT 1NOW1 AA TO IN RREMY CONTRACTOR N NER1ERY M•TT. RCO115 H4e 01.4W4 D 1R01 b D NOT110 TO erwT M ACWT[OIMAL RAID TO DETDMNE M S r S.,A. R'-R' Wd• S-. S•Y iL1ED7 I OE 001. DEN@N CCNI[Nr.ANY 0RSNRTe N.ALL DE DIRECTED TO THE , . ! I • AIDIOAteUAL TO ExHOR 9,AND . MN CONTRACTOR CONC[RNM ALL Iri16 TO OE RDIOYED OR TO RMAN µ'J• • POCH D HAS CHM=Mal MOE AO.rm. • ♦ • TO IDOII'SIT Ie.ALL OTHER Me TO 9�1116 • WALL F11WOR RxMVA ARE FOR REHRIDICE OLLT,ACNAL Nat ARC LCGTIONe ..• ' I TBMAM M POUTED. O.wFI nR.TA' bo To DE AFI•ROJ[D DY[1bCH ' ID ALL Ni[Riga FNINNES eHOLL DE CLADS'NOR CUSS L' . • Tel O N.IPD A2.01 .. m •, PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN . ' V/OWAR w'.r••• . oMAN MOOR PIRLOONAT LY. n.r.a --- --- --- _._T__ _ _ — - ADN7B ARD.IEOR,RE Na _. _. .•_•sue Mar `I'/NEW MIAMI-DADE APPROVED \ GAF TIMBERLINE SELECT 40 NEW W000 DOOR, NEW WOOD DOOR. DIMENSIONAL ASPHALT PAINTED,REFER TO • PAINTED.REFER TO SHINGLES W/SHADOW ACCENT AS,1 . AR,T EFFECT INSTALLED OVER 30/ E],tl3'-g"Y,I,P, /i EL,413'-'.V,I F, FELT ON 3A'CDX PLYWOOD /q,b,RDOF q T.O.ROOF \ SHEATHINOSttPI J w El.al3'_I"y,I,F, ., i I. _ __ ,�j TL O,-1"•(.1 F. T.O.ROOF oilil�iii'iii'iiiiliiiiwni�iliiliiiiilniinilliiii'Iiiii✓�.iii1"'Sj��t���i1�aL,,^-- -IXRn �aD � YTA,ROOF "^ i nnj•m ann.nu:nnulu.unn.jlnlnu•11.ru.S PAINTED.kEiER TO — ,A.•�,s� tiul uiii�iu Mniu�,luui�il�l in,Ivliil�j111..,111.,11sCu1w11iwluw114Nye1�' (TYp,) __•_n� aIQ'-,"Y�I.F, rw�r 11,inL1 _ _ _ T kbaF 'e:e3_lu..n.u".r� i'iYmi .0. EL ila-A"v1F. •"7 3' ES'G"r'_'cve.'�:6'r;° - ..Ins "fdn��'��:RI.,nII�.n1I�.IIo.�III.1o•:.ol•.111. ';�„;,;,..�,�u� � uu u.nlnui� uu 'iiniliui�ui'niii'1 „�.,,,,, q 7,0.ROOF wl °'�liinuawni„Innulnnlnnuunlouunnrnw�nulnw nnlmnut,llon,nwiw�a: NEW 3".8"SHIPLAPPED'WObO �� "'1u1 �-mi e�:mu''�'�il rant/r=2 r ulnuunur, /�'.Ir //gy�p, •:•-r'VJ.F. t'-I• I,F, ' nw' iMi')li'�mi4u1'i�iiu�niiu•4. I,n1 ma••, __DHQPSIDlNGJ4 MATCH. "��p. 4D.ROOF EL, 8 V. _ uulaersw tz• ' '. _...A�.O.ROOF py?��'� EXISTING PAT1EflN,PAINTED /��•''.'��'1, ", - `� % � �"aw1 __ siiu',,I.I'�"i�i"I'I'�Er' �� � �-!� l iau NEW PREFABRICATED ��� IXISTING t]"W000 TRIM, Q� I Yi•I I I Q Q TAPERED PVC �� ' I PAINTED OW.) 1 i I i I - BUNGALOWCOLUMN. mom �•,1 rw IMr r. �� ( i1�'I �IiI�h llillil I 'I1:nit1121 6r,..^ CHAOS-WORTH 9V_ —�., „�" II EXISTING I WObD(TRIMI 1 i( ' II`.0 r��l=I ��'� tlWU • MM.Ell CHAOSWokiH _ PAINTED ttP. ,1 1 1!1""" —J I '—� �� f COLUMNS(ttP.) l_I I III I I _ h Et.a._ . I�IIII1IIliiilli llll.liliall 114111 �IIII��IIIIII lEl1-!'1•1 III!SSE a Il1.'II��1� .ems•,...... Y PPP iliii _ r)1.• NEW ADA COMPLIANT NEW W000 STYLE • �I" ALUMINUM HANDRAIL. •R_-2'-T' ALUMINUM RAILING, L' • •Si I • GRAD •ST IR PAINTED(TYP.) PAINTED I I" (Jy�EL_F-F' NEW CONC.STAIRS,STAINED NEW ADA COMPLIANT Y GkAOE•RAMP FINISH(ttP.) ALUMINUM HANDRAIL. O EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION O EXISTING EAST ELEVATION PADDED(TTP,) NEW ALUMINUM RAILS 2 SCALE,VA•"Fo• SCALD y.•T-0• PAUMINUM RAILING, .T• •S I PAINTED(ttP.) NEW ADA COMPLIANT CONC,RAMP, Q quo un STAINED FINISH NEW AIAMI-OADE APPROVED GAF TIMBERLINE SELECT 40 11111MAu o,n DIMENSIONAL ASPHALT SHINGLES W/SHADOW ACCENT EFFECT INSTALLED OVER 30F EL,tly_a• EL t13-0"V,I F, FELT ON I('CDX PLYWOOD T.O.R60F .7 T.O.RO.j7OF \ WTI ,y, q Iy�{q.� *,,L SHF.NTHI N2 PP.) ELF qT:b.R80F VI.F. MC,rtYYA1tl"Y ZEIiW`�IW:1,1'YIZIY`'R' at CY/STING RAW VAN001�/, T.O.fldOF V.I.P. a' .1.. wVnlo.. n • _ PAINTED,REFER TO 000 I. 4,EL tlp ♦.V,Ii OII n W 41,.4 Iw1 ,, ' 1/1 1•T' ,11 TTP) '}D�EELL tIQ-AI F. V TO ROOF 0 1 Y4...... A...A.... V i3O.ROOF w NEW}'z0"$HIPLAPPED W000 B'-I"V.I.F. $EE1,a0'-r'V.I F, I1.0.11•,••1• wH''ex.,, M .,MM,""..'' ' I^ �i . '. 1 YI ti•,� PATTERN PAINTED El W y i.�.ROOF 'liu''iiul.wlu o wnwn 1 I. F EXISTING PATTERN,PAINTED /�= T,O,k00K l� � IF"--"''''. IXISTING B I'W000 TRIM, _ j E n ALUMINUM NUM RA WOOD LINO, X NEW WOOD DOOR, �.t A �� PAINTED,REFER TO ESQ, Q',I f mi B� , PAINTED(ttP.) I—In yl '15I PAINTED(TYP) LLl __ �I•'I �L� 'i. NEW LONCGSTAIINT DD(P,) 'I I5I-IL III _ ____ 1, '4,1 PAINTED(TIP.)�.INEW ADA —I11••••• . 11 I �3 PAINTED 1NED LI �I` I 1 PAINTED(AP)ORAAIL, 0 (JcI I© I:I I FINISH(ttP.) lIIIIIIII III - �Illill I I .tp 0 U 5 G Z $EL i.t0,_O., - _ ir, _.—_I II_�.. i 1 TALI 'T-- 'F.F.E,1ST FLR g d Q 0_ • ' -I- • Gam• •S IR 3> ui NEW ADA COMPLIANT SONG RAMP, • • • •S I' NEW CONC.STAIRS, 5 P 1 •W STAINED FINISH NEW CONE STAIRS,STAINED STAINED FINISH Cl)P _l,_T„ FINISH(TSP,j ) Q 0 OEXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION gORADE.STAIR 4 EXISTING WEST ELEVATION 3 SCALD Mva•o• NEW W000 STYLE O SCALE.Mon 4• . ghp FA PAINTEDINUM(TYP I)N0. NOTE •W NEW ADA COMPLIANT NOTE' ALUMINUM HANDRAIL. FXITTINO WOOD WINOOWV FYICTING NYTOD TRIM wTr PAINTED(TOP.) THE EXISTING WOOD WINDOWS SHALL BE THE EXISTING WOOD TRIM SHALL.BE REPAIRED REPAIRED WHERE FEASIBLE.OR REPLACED IN WHERE FEASIBLE.OR REPLACED IN KIND ONLY OW. AB SHOWN KIND ONLY IF IT IS TOO DETERIORATED TO IF IT IS TOO DETERIORATED TO REPAIR. REPAIR USING THE SAME SASH AND PANE NEW EXTERIOR Y/000 DOORS WWI 'NE CONFIGURATION AND OTHER DESIGN DETAILS. NEW EXTERIOR WOOD DOORS TO MATCH IN RR .N ANS THETURESIAS T SHALL FRAMES,SASH, SUCH KIHO THE EXISRNG W000 PANEL DOORS FEATURES AS THE ERASES,SASH,OS,PANELED N USING THE SAME DESIGN DETAILS, THE Sal w OR DECO SIDS HERS A D MO D ING, AN ARCHITECT SHALL PRESERVE SUCH FEATURES INTERIOR DECORATED EXTERIORER AND UTTERS AN AND +..b OS30R WEAPPLICABLE.ANDWHSHUTTERSAND KIND,NNS OR TEE FRAMES,HEAA5,MOLDIN S,PANELED WHERE SARETO WHERE M-LACED WOOD INTERIORO DECORATED JAMBS AND UTTERS WHEREENO ,rar Ko WINDOWS ARE FI SE A ION. -CLAD OF LE. EXTERIOR SHUTTERS THE SAME CONFIGURATION. APPUUDLE. A3.1 -1011TECTUFE IC • PROVIDE MIAMI-DAOE }}��E[ / F.•AAI EEL a2:._D" APPROVED GAF TIMBERLINE —_ ct 4T,O.noI. r Y N.R•• 11•1111/III111111111111111111 SELECT EA TIMBE0HA- v 111111111111111r1111r111M11 ASPHALT SHINGLES WI SHADOW _ t.+26'-0" alp EL+26'-0" -ACOENf- INSTALLED-INSTAF3fD-- [ Y T.O.ROOF '2 5 Illllll llll Imo!. I I I I i 111 Illllll II 1111111/111111 5 0,ROOF 1'-0.„, �� �i OVER 30/FELT ON�"COX 111111111111I111111::111111111111111111111111111111111IIII1111II1111111111111111Illllll I'-O'tti�, ` PLYWOOD SHEATHING(TYP.) 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 y El,a21'-a• -t^ �` —— 111111r111111t11111111111111I1I111111111111111I111111111111rt111111I1111111!1111t11t Ay •* 111I1111rIt111III11111111r1111111111111111II...,,11........111111111I11M11— •(T.O.TRIM .` EL a 0' I1'• _ __ §4L4.1NCENSE,GE M 111111111111111H_1IIIII1111111I1111111111/IIIIINJANI11IAggi11111111111r11111 M EL.+20'-1I" _ _ }i..._ — _ __ ———. tE{IIOR STiER"r STYLE— _ _•_._._..____._._._..._.___._.__._,_._.__. __._ _._._._.__._._._._._ • — 7 B.D.SOFFIT :"•'-"-- Y6�SOFFIT ^W'BY SHUTTERUNO.PAINTED I _ [t,+Iy 9" �m�»'�"� [[L„+I6'-B" .SHUTT— LAPI1r1r'Ir1L..�.. •E 5"NOM.SIDE TH FINISH. V C• it _ RI ® ® OLD BOARD,SMOOTH FINISH, EL.+II'-^ PAINTED(TYP.U.N.OJ EL,+II'-" F.F.E.2ND FLR -T _ 12"NOG.WIDE HARDITRIAr--- - - F,LG,,Eag2N $([L�,+ 7J" -I L` OLD BOARD,SMOOTH FINISH, - t�g,p,yql ^ Y 0.0.TRIIA /y PAINTED-� ^F SINGLE HUNG -5"NOM.(Si"EXPOSED) L� SINGLE HUNG WIDE NARDITRIIFXLD BOARD, r�.a� ALUMINUM ALUMINUM i "♦ SMOOTH FINISH,PAINTED 11 WINDOW,REFER A^^'••"j•••'• WINDOW,REFER / S. '�' �•■ ■^' / ♦ PREFABRICATED NON-TAPERED 6 TO AB,I(TYP.) TO�'1(�•) / ♦ PVC BUNGALOW COLUMN, _ (,,( (a] PAINTED,BY CHAT/SWORN ( . • RP COLUMNS ♦♦♦ / 0"STUCCO,SNIP-TROWEL '' 1111 I i l �,EFl.+D'-0'• ♦ / FINISH.PAINTED(TYP,) q'TT,F,-TS5 FCR O B.-. DM 0 NORTH ELEVATION O EAST ELEVATION BOALE V4 O-0• 1.AI.rt1Au 4A1. A•Itwa• CAT. PROVIDE MIAMI-DADE li EL.+26'_0'• _- APPROVED SO TIMBERLINEIO --_ _ -1 A.RO 4E7 +2B'�D„ v — -fit f DF T.O.AZR IIIIIIIIIlI11�i�11�t111111�11 ASPHALTSHINGLESW/SHADOW \ t�,,+2OF0" }DEELL,,aay05 --ADCENT-EFELT ON i'ALCDD--- �,un11,..IRliIIIU*I IrtUU..nn�•n.0•IMMIn.mIIuJlnmM0 OM VT,O.RDOF Y Y.0.Ro01p, I -.I -- 111111111111Gw;1111111�rul iln1ii11ni1[Irr/rn11111111�11111n nrnu�I�Ilnu1nn111 5� OVER JOp SHEATHING G(OP,) 111111111101111/.1M1511111111111IIIIII111111II 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 PLYWOOD SHEATHING(ttPJ 111111111111111/1111111111111111111111111111M1111111111IIItII1111M111111n1111111111111111111111111 F,+21'_t" EL,+21•-t^ .� 11MI1111111111�11MIM1MI11I1111111111M1Igr1111111111111It11111Q111111111111111111111II 11I all II! 5h1.p TRIM I- o,Ta1M 111;rW r1t1111111m111runrmmnuimpir mAnul�ImrulrWllnl�/gminel�M1 4�+ jI UI }��FLL,+2G,_,,,, -` 9t11!It110t11711L••tlCteleM1et11H:1tICL"_•—•_•_=••= J q 9.0.50FFIT I `_� IIM■IIII11111m111M11M111111v11111 0, OFF Y ZI { I 1 1 I I IMI, •1UV�} V N • ? I'-0"TYP, -G"TYP. _.l� �I�I■I c ) =��Ilil o ua V. l 7,25"(6"UPDSED)WIDE r�1.. J 11@yyyl SINGLE HUNG�! 11111111 �I HAR0IPLANN LAP SIDING,SELECT �111 �� SINGLE HUNG `� O ALUMINUM - .. 11 I, �_ CEDARMILL FINISH,PAINTED ttP. I _IT ALUMINUM 0 Q WINDOW.REFER w—T 5"NOM.WIDE H/ROITRIM WINDOW,REFER O Q © QA TO AD,1(TYP,) t a TO AB.I(TYP,) - - -�- XLD BOARD,SMOOTH FINISH, i Y 1l,. yy PAINTED(TYP.U.N.0,) _ EL.+II'-7" .J p O.Ill F,F,E.12N6'FLR �/— -- - 12"NOM.ITIIDE H�RDITRIM- +, �i,t,L.2ND FLH V C �W j� LL,, gy_JJ %lD BOARD,SMOOTH FINISH, F' J- y } q B.0+TRIL( --I--� a • "PAINTED--� - �BO�TRIN" 0 co FV S"NOM,(Si"EXPOSED) WIDE HARDITRII,TXLD BOARD, 4,/ �) z SMOOTH FINISH,PAINTED / PREFABRICATED NON-TAPERED j j ♦♦ ♦♦ cl PVC BUNGALOW COLUMN, / / PAINTED,BY CHADSWORTH ,♦ p® ♦ (6 OS COLUMNS ♦ ♦ / /L "F y STUCCO, � P) ♦ i/ q etn ♦♦ iN FINISH,PAINTED(TO w+> Al SHOWN .F.+I'S-7DLR I .SppII town 1Y,VL Iii; 0441T• AMB ®SOUTH ELEVATION O WEST?ELEVATION FAA,�T1b oebv WALE.Vv"1-0• Br ID A3.2 rwamo •.a.m...worm .................. PROVIDE 1.11A1,41-DADE APPROVED OAF II,/. TINBERUNE SELECT 40 DIMENSIONAL ASPHALT SHINGLES Wi SHADOW 4. / / ,/, =•-• _ ACCENT EFFECT(TOP.) / 4/ 'teid•IXIMaralr 0.'112090iI" PIPE GRID(TTP) ei .*R22C7-ii" ,.................... ,.......,„,......„.. h=tra:i.s7.:=:if • .17-0.' • SOFFIT -- 5Adfi.rri77//./ 4;1 sEL.0.'sioriiTt: j/:— ila EL, " ..i.,•i.,. mr T.O.ROOF TO:: STEEL ///Z' 11.0.4•he PAINTED .B1•••;, TUBE STEEL BEAU, 211',.,..'::'4'.'..,..''',....'......' I ".' ;;7 ,//2/'',' PAINTED .:11p1F4, _.'... Ai, . -"'/;--/4". $is. 2',2" #0FTi.-6.12a" ---- 7 .--.,.. g.. '-'';,/; ,',,•• ,.......,,T,,JA, 'stucco SKI 7-• T TROWEL FINISH,PAINTED 6 , ,. 6 t 1111 7,4',//.// MP.) . .. I.:'.::'.: ... ' ' '.','**.:.. *10 , , PVC PICKET FENCE W/ I. (1)!••%:,V!,.•:'..',':', ':::•%:.:',;,.. .:V.. ',; , . ., , I . GOTHIC POST CAP, I. ., '' *" ' L 4....'.•'.Mk.• • .. ., Le- q PAINTED(TV.) • * '' ''`.4.:•••,:'''''''7'.CRI . In r, ° , 1 ° , .IL! - ' ! - le: liM .. IIIIIIIIIIIiklill 1 I[1111 ... COLUMN BASE AV SI-IDO ii[I rv''..'.:.1;-;::::;'::::'.'...'1.i.:;;" r-Iiiillitill-5..",AISIIITIli AN-111b-L-2.........4 " - " ' . — — y-,------ .---,....,---.... .. s F.F..Z" ---SU4LAIEM'Xpkilrt'/N --'5i. ••'. •'..:...,,- gio0'',..;..7...:'7'...itse :. 11 ....._..—. 4,---,::!=iirirronirmws..11...0%.,.•7.......,774,,mas. ...... ADA COMPLIANT EEL CABLE PASS(TM.OF 2) ST HANDRAIL.(n?.) ARCATA BENCH BY LANDSCAPE FORMS(TOP.) (---, EAST ELEVATION \..1) acaz thol-o. WTTMS uni "maw. .11 PROVIDE IMMO...DADE \' APPROVED OAF TIMBERLINE SELECT RO DIMENSIONAL ASPHALT • ,,....,.. .`... .12,:S.'`,` ,.. SHINGLES Wi SHADOW ACCENT EFFECT(TOP.) i.'. -•\ \ CO CO .._ • 0 e.,1,41 At EL,.ir—Q" ‘Aq;,,,, ,..\., IN — $SI:O.1,EFFW 8 0 1 Vi* si,B.O.SOFFI A..,a 4.15.-3" \....., 111 0 ROOF 6 t—Lii 7 T.O.ROOF -..\,, \,,, „:.•‘ .. TORE STEEL COLUMN, 4;.....tt 12.•2 PAINTED(TYP.) i i I 111 ' \\ \•\s,\, .4.-4. AS 4 :s.-v TUBE STEEL BEAM. 0 M V) , ,% '›.\.,,,‘\".'.\,‘,‘ .,....4 ..... ‘,..:......4,.`,,,......,.,..,, PAINTED(TYP.) - ‘,.`•L\ .s..,, :, I,;hp •..10$142 '-`.i'...-...f:c-re;•,_,J,•:;-#'4-*:fir .t.*,;„•.;.••;•;..,,,,N eriol.t..6.4.10,i-40'. 7• to.auli ....,•,,,s ltV0047`;1:- -;.1"iiitefi... :'.. . -r:'...5...,:;:". ',..Ct...1,.:,..:...:.;;;;i: STUCCO.SKIP.. 0 <C. r TROWEL FINISH,PAINTED co ea i Z \\N\\ .1, ‘. .;•-•••••r: ,:'...;.•••??.*:•,.>.••Anl.::,?...*.7..•co pvc ptcxEr FENCE Wi pGAO,THNTelCDP(OvpST.CAP) . ,• \N, VIS,.I....'.....'...'....P.'..%'•' ••, T,,,. 7*• :' ; .h.••r •1:4 i.• .^,4:.‘fet'oV:::,I '•• • . \ pi „ • . . . *3'..,i,•:.:,-;..:.„: .,., . •;,....;;•,,, PAM i Z .EL 4,•••6" _ 11 1111 11111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII •1 1 1111 Ill 1: IL 7. 4 .., ... ,„;4iiiiikiwil I 1111111111111111 k ' •• 4 AG \.\- ..,.1, IP•".11111.'.!1'.................ip'—',:':,:n;•••:•:'-.7•••'•*-2.•.n.:*-L.—•*.., • . • . • ...• . • L.4.017.21_...-...—. ISMS AS SHOWN (AV 4 ..116 PILASTER BASE W/ 01.1...YL ADA COMPLIANT STEEL SIMULATED KEYSTONE HANDRAIL(TIP.) pArrEam owe. AIRS ADA COMPLIANT CONC. RAMP AT I:12 SLOPE, MAO 10 STAINED FINISH PER ARCHITECT M..00 000312 r-,-- WEST ELEVATION 41.41.MO \„.Z..1 SCA*1/4.4-0' A3.3 • PROVIOE MIAMI-DADE APPROVED GAF �� TIMBERLINE SELECT ID DIMENSIONAL ASPHALT SHINGLES WI SHADOW ACCENT EFFECT(TIP.) EL+ZO'-I" L.+pp'-I'• 0 T.O.ROOF iliiii�Iiiiiiiliiil�iiiil;7iiiiiiiiiiiiliiiiniiiiiiiiiiiliiii�liilliliiiUliiiiili(iiiiifiiliili%I Mili(iiiliiiii TT 0.kDOT i1I��1��1I��11�Imu1111tl1•�11��1•�II1�1•�IA0111/�11�1��1111/�1•�1!��IIII��1111��1��1��1•�11�N•�111011���1��1��1t1I10111�:l: PIPE CRID(TAP.) w"____ .w Ap EL+17'-0" b ELO 117'F-Dr BA.SOFFIT '; fY�EL+10O J '•' '� A.EL.I5 J'• — A'T.O. 15- nt- • ' T.O.ROOF eee11 1>/ �e��e��1---�1��� EXPOSED PLYWOOD "'�� w,,.. /i' li� ' CEILING.PAINTED TUBE STEEL BEAM. � � ' TUBE STEEL BEAM. ..�... PANTED(TYP.) �Y�IMIA111! PAINTED(1YP.) EL,+I 0 fibs --._ .. �' 4 .o.BE�?„ )s.; I"STUCCO,SKIP- 4 Q, :: Ti,,• ;:;:; �� i:� TROWEL FINISH, AINTED • ;•.>.., i': •; .iP y1? ' (TYP.) ''i5'A' '�• +y. A F PI KEr ENCE �• 't r we c W TUBE STINTED COLUMN, 1� el::p Y<I 1! ''' • ':I'L•'.' • .... ""�I I6 GOTHIC POST CAP, PAINTED(TIP.) I+l .-=II���-1 yr• �;,•4+^ `} I.—��—.• PAINTED(TYP ....ww,r. �rlpp�If' h. +I•_@�� IIII ' Iill ,�', `�' .G.STAG RAA V EEL+STAGE 1 .. .., ..f,... .. .. Yh GRADE-p COLUMN BASE W/ ADA COMPLIANT STEEL SIMULATED KEYSTONE PATTERN HANDRAIL(TYP.) ARCATA BENCH BY O NORTH ELEVATION LANDSCAPE COMPLIANT CONC. NOSCAPE FORMS(TAP,) eCALG 1/{••fH7' RAMP AT 1:12 SLOPE, STAINED FINISH PER ARCHITECT C STEPS. Q-- ^•1n STAINEDNED FINISH PER ARCHITECT(TAP.) .111,(TTYI PATI A Rm.., eAn PROVIDE MAN-DADE APPROVED GAF TIMBERLINE SELECT 40 DIMENSIONAL ASPHALT SHINGLES W/SHADOW ACCENT EFFECT(TYP.) EEL, h[L+20'-1" Y.O.ROO-I„ (r Z R Y.O.ROOF illiiii11111111T11/iiiiiii1111111ii1110ii1111i111111111iiii1iliiil11111111ii111i1iiliii i1111iii iiiiii11111111i11i1111ii PIPE GRID(TAP.) X Z 111I19111I�11111111111111111111111�111IIe.1111/111�111111IP11111111111l111.1�1111I�11111t11111i11111[1111I1111.�IeR1:JI11I X 0 0 •�� -11JBCSO ELCOLWAN,.— 'IT-?" .4 Z'" },EL am-0' 1� -- V:•.SOFF 4 B.•.SOFFIT I • ® PAINTED(TYP.) EL aly-J Q $[L.+15' ��, NEN!Mil o Y, q T.O.ROOF TUBE STEEL BEAN, 1111111111111L.1111 I 1 I 1 Itlll 1 1 0.ROD V r W PAINTED TAP. 11111111VIIIII OIII1111111 VIIIIIIIT1I1111NIII11111I1111111111IINI111111111I1111/11111�111VIII IINI 11IVIIII111i S ( ) 11111111111111111/111111111111111111111p1pI1I1111p11111I1111111p1111111g11111pppg1N111111111111111111111111111III Q J ouml111SI nmm�mlummmlVIALME ERVI n ICIATI ITIAT VISI nnuuw nannnnnlnm;mu11Nu11NUI1N1111N11I11111I11111I11111111111�nu11uuunualnumunnulunulnAl =W mll1011mmnelt_nm_i;mmmm 211.51�lnmmu2l.gmEmmnmmimn3!!!!M�l�n E .{ i"STUCCO. NIE- '' r 1 4 +. )1 + PVC PICKET FENCE WI a•O TROWEL FINISH,PAINTED 1 'T.• •u r '� GOTHIC POST CAP, �.N (TYP.) ;n:. : - PAINTED(T(P.) < Q PIUSTER BASE W/ L'=1c"i41• .:x�'''' • •V ii COLUMN BASE W/ 0• SIMUUTEO KEYSTONE '.T):IiI) •Ij "�•^ r.,,!; •'FT ••.1��` 'tT'.',:,j:" y1� SA1TENKEYSTONE CD 3Z PATTERN I(Id: `¢''.' a':•1:.' .:.! i• PATTERN Q �,` IIIIIIIII -- \'` -6•' 'IIII III( �1'` .:iF.,'" �.y,:i..~ _ _' I:�:I:I:I:I:I:I:II�� �A',LIS ^:'•i=alp:.=44:i�i'���r--',:1.'v YF�:�IIIIII IIII-� • T E Z GRADE-p . .77 ..r..........•,....IYFC`., . ,.•. .. .- 4 • • eAn 1CY1 AS SHOWN p.m RV VL OSOUTH ELEVATION AMe eOAle:1/I••f-0• 011rt 10 Y.. 060012 S OW q A3.4 ».... JD60M ARC/RECTUM IC o -- � \W��II DOOR SCHEDULE IMPACT 3_0 3'-0" �S'-D' 3'-0" 1'-B" DOOR SIZE(NOMINAL) TYPE DOOR FPAAIE NOTES RESISTANT I { t 4`� - N0. GLAZING n jl.. J r WO. HT. THC 1MTL FINISH MATT. FINISH 1 i! 11 101 3'-0" 7'-0" _3(4" A H4 POT HU POT TRANSOM W/IMPACT OO y�]j� \ ` 02 3'-0" 7'-0" 3 4' A H4 POT HY POT RESISTANT GLAZING �� ' I�I ""\ { -' M 03 3'-0" 7'-0" -3/4• A H4 POT H4 PNT- L o Gj I..I b " I? � "" 04 6'-10" 4'-4'• B" H ALUM PNT - - m I i• *I �7 w _ g 05 3'-0" 7'-0" -3/4" C H4 POT H4 POT A. �� > 'l�y'I1` > 11 F. '�' / 11 ':�. 06 (2)3'-0" 7'-0" 31L4" F HN POT NM TNT // ui '�`°^`�' V 07 3'-0" 7'-0'• _354" C H4 PNT HM POT ww,s�w.w,r .. 05 3'-0" 7'-0" C S 3 4• C NM PNT H4 ?M• CO 3'-0" 7'-0" -3/4• 0 H4 PNT 114 PNTci A B D E �"'�'�""" 201 3'-0" 7'-0" -3/4" C SOWS POT HY POT 202 (2)2.-0" 7'-0" -3/N" G WD PNT 6-PANEL • 6_pANEL FLUSH LOUVERED LOUVERED 203 3'-0" 7-0" -3/4" 8 HM PNT 114 POT W�TRANSOM 204 3'-0" 7'-0" -3 4" C SCWD POT FHA -PNT 101 3'-0" 7'-0" -3 4" C H4 POT H14 POT 102 3'-0" 7'-0" -3/4" D 144 PNT H4 PNT 103 3'-0" 7'-0" -3/4" 0 HM PNT 104 PATr 0�, I g-10 t 104 .3-0. 7'-0" -3/4" C H4 POT HU PHT 1 1 101 2'-8" 6'-8" -3/4" E SC'A'D PNT WD PNT ` \ f1' A •j02 3-0' 6-fl" -3/4' C SCWD PNi WD POT "``\ uotIIp03 ((2))2-0" 6'-a" -3 4" C SOWS POT WO PNT -04 (2)2-0' 6'-B" -3/4• C SCWD PNT WO PNT > > A,1 '\1b 05 3-0" 6-8• -3/4" B SCWD PNT WO 9NT NOTE1 06 3'-0" 6'-8" 3 4" B SCWD POT WO PNT NOTE I / A 07 2'-6" 6'-8" -3Z4" B 5C*0 PNT AD PNT NOTE I '^ 05 (2)3'-0" 6'-B" 3 4" F SCWD POT WD PNT F G H ABBREVIATIONS NOTES FLUSH BI-FOLD ROLL-UP ALUM ALUMINUM I.NEW EXTERIOR W000 DOORS TO MATCH IN KIND THE EXISTING WOOD PANEL DOORS �4w an H4 HOLLOW METAL USING THE SAME DESIGN DETAILS,THE ARCHITECT SHALL PRESERVE SUCH FEATURES AS PNT PAINT THE FRAMES.HEADS,HEADMOLDS,PANELED OR DECORATED JAMBS AND MOLDINGS,AND O DOOR TYPES SEWS SOLID CORE WOOD INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR SHUTTERS WHERE APPUCABLE. SCALE V4•1-0" WD WOOD 2.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ROUGH OPENINO DIMENSIONS WITH MANUFACTURER PRIOR TO INSTALATION. arrrrAu oAn J.CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT MIAIAI-DADS APPROVED PRE-ENGINEERED SHOP DRAWINGS t SIGNED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA LICENSED ENGINEER FOR ALL COORS FOR ARCHITECTS REVIEW ANO APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, • WINDOW SCHEDULE ti TYPE DESCRIPTION SIZE(NOMINAL) GLAZING FRAME NOTES AD. HT. TH K, .TYPE MAIL FINISH _ A SINGLE-HUNG 2'-0' 4'-0" - IR ALUM PNT n 8 SINGLE-HUNG 2'-5" 4'-6" V.I.F. V.I.F. WD PNT NOTE 1,2 "1 Et C SINGLE-HUNG 2'-3" 4'-6" W.F. V.I.F, WO POT NOTE 1,2 0 0 SINGLE-HUNG 2'-I" 4'-6" V.I.F. V.I.F. WO POT NOTE 1,2 ow__, 4 0 E CASEMENT I'-II I" 3'-II " V.I.F. V.I.F. WO POT NOTE 1.2 F CASEMENT I'-II " 3'-II " V.I.F. V.I.F. WO POT NOTE 1.2 AO V G SINGLE-HUNG I'-11 " 2'-10" V.I.F. V.I.F. WD PNT NOTE 1.2 _1 t Z- NEW COMMUNITY SUPPORT FACILITY ¢ 0 xx Q ABBREVIATIONS NOTES FJ ALUM ALUMINUM I.THE EXISTNO WOOD WINDOWS SHALL BE REPAIRED WHERE FEASIBLE,OR REPLACED I'-II}°V.V. I'-II}'•V.I.F. I'-II}"V.I.F, J y IR IMPACT-RESISTANT IN KIND ONLY IF IT IS TOO DETERIORATED TO REPAIR USNO THE SAME SASH ANS 2'-5"V.I.F. 2'-3"V.I.F.I.F 2'-1"V.I.F. � V POT PAINT PANE CCNFIOURATON AND OTHER DESIGN DETAJLS. THE ARCHITECT SHALL PRESERVE - �_I I �_-t—t I fA �.-`.�11. �—•.- t a P p 1 0 co WD WOOD SUCH FEATURES AS THE FRAMES,SASH.AUXINS,GLAZINO,SILLS.HEADS. -7 ` HEADICLOA PANELED OR DECORATED JAMBS AND MOLDINGS.AND INTERIOR AND �= w PT - Z EXTERIOR SHUTTERS AND SUNDS WHERE APPUCABLE, WHERE REPLACED IN RIND. > WINDOWS ARE TO BE ALUMINUM-CLAD WOOD OF THE SAME CONATGURAT 1ti 'i 1'+ON. PT i b 1 2 THE CONTRACTOR MUST FIELD VERIFY EXISTING DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT i 1: i 1•; i 4 -'._v �+ -§I �' co a OF WORK. TO - "" 2.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ROUGH OPENING DIMENSIONS WITH MANUFACTURER PRIOR TO T `��` ^ P > INSTALLATION. in N I I. J.CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT MIAMI-GAGE APPROVED PRE-ENGINEERED SHOP DRAWINGS w 4 5"^- CO` 'II"-'J lun SIGNED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA LICENSED ENGINEER FOR ALL WINDOWS FOR ARCHITECTS i`• i-., i i REVIEW MO APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. >"^ -`. y'N - [ FKAu AS 6HOWN I _ J • I' *An W.VL I ' © O Y O Q G BIRO m AMB Bart 10 .,,STING HISTORIC SUSAIN WILLIAMS HOUSE •v,x0 DOJO* SR 1G 0 WINDOW TYPES A8.i SCALE.VaT-ro. 0 .......... II- i Iti NG . ate' • OEAST ELEVATION O NORTH ELEVATION , 8O*LB•N.T.E. SCALE.NTB. p.wa wn ,s ila• • ,x o2 +t,,,,,pir l a. rn1• e.n ty,. .. .. • A venom. CMS til CO O WEST ELEVATION Q S ID ALE K H ELEVATION < _ WM =4 I n SCALE. - le 2< QES JD 3t 30 x Qa a)El. 11D i N DATr OCAS AS SHOWN au*w ir•VL aav n. AIAE a-ale 0.10 OEAOR LW IP F1.1 G41 .iK n ; �..y Al CW I r G4 15 I/�ncl\ �/11Q��s}f r+Wr++•- �Q I�Q1yI 'uv a ;y CAM 1r._ _rtzt�r 1 / \ T C r _ •C' CAM a ... ..r . f.'k------- . . • .;•........„...., r'" ..7 .:--1 riff I 1 ;I IIG41. xna "' MI 7' ' •L '� CAL 4 CAM \]J CW 11 uV 12 II i) �( II "'":..'.-i:''..-__ I II 1 rl wn • —44-- 1Vjtj CAN 3 ILIMRTALS WV CAM B ' 7:( (;17..... . b....... L e. . A mr ma al C,411 uu 1 u u f C551 f ilfsP i x , ,..e..- N , c. W O PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION PLAN i •' .� CAM! CAM 4 6 BCAW vaafo' ri) a.� I i ', ,,: 0 N �w I f~ II t .. ,..:.. „,ii,, ., = ink v ;,..�:' P a. $ Q_0 cri:. . do 111e CC . �A �! I �. I 1 IV �.Y r '•f t Y.n� >C Z= i cv„,ems 0 Q a F, ! ra • a n _��� ci fA _ - _._,_.. ,. :.-- cAu to N CIAI 13 CAI t♦ Y CAM B '_' ,4 CO uV 11 G11 If 1� r 77 - ICA. AB SHOWN • 1 .r.; �:� purni 0.YL oleo AUG �:' c n•cart mo wen ma, GcutY IS U 11 G1117 F1.2 • uD�r,mi . _..A� I I I aI ea 77.57' I _�L r_-tee —w, - - —T�a—v—1—c--a�>37 _ A I H ".:", u u u P. I.1 u r v+ wed w I II ,...�.; u u u IN .. u I •u.•.r I ' E%ISTING ASPHALT I ww...+..+.. F • ..:.' PARKING N.C.) a1111 1 n,...- •"t.....a i E�yP51CD I .I \ ill w.u'�'u.� HL, :G,E .r . ., . .T . . u . . p . I_I 0. :-:,r, ij-S?.-. -Ci .0 u u u u .. ., u • FM.Une Twol...HnO loc. b;o 1I,,F,14Ceiiii.qiiizar:::d i� 11)�•a� ' I \ o �'LL7i'-:`�iS:sE'4 '�'" e e e e e u/ e d I• \ INSTALLATION ",74.1"•r':'�':..�,,,,w•• Foy ' i- E¢ .1• e e/ I THE ONE PIELE P(15T SHALL BE DEL-• �:.i5.'E1.•..:°`'i+1•` I T I• nOo.r.L +1,;.'�S:iE:y:E?"iE':C•51.1 = u u u u • I• PROVIDED WITH FOUR 7/1' • T.T0474.�,•Eji11 7C-1,i •' u M .T n ® y I DIAMETER BY YI'LONG L•TYPE u •'i 52 tTj '{Ii`1C; ® @ — 1IO 1 I• ANCHOR BOLTS TO BE v- ((i`I.i•LC$•.':Et571 MOUNTING"'` O Y INSTALLED ON A 10'DIAMETER —�•-• MOUNTING �i5�5: 5°- '-•+5 HEIGHT •.1 II I N BOLT CIRCLE. TWO DOORS „„ HEIGHT i ikliFiiik 1 `0 HEI7GHT T SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE CTE�?_c1-_•5#15EF.:iy� SPAOY MUSEUM BAR EGFO`ANCHORAGE AND • L '., (N.I.C.) Ol WIRING ACCESS. A GROUNDING :714. iE 3 �./- E%ISTING TW•$TDRY I W SHALL BE PROVIDED .Li-ii F - 4• l L.B.S.BUILDING I I 20'HIGH RE FIE NIIIN OR INSIDE BASE ACCESSIBLE •� )Lj 1 C. ¢ FROM ONE DOOR. S( r r 11'HIGH ..lt iii '• • . — N ® awn I'-J 1 LA E%ISTING OVERHEAD p� W, Iz p u W/PRE CAST FOUNDATION 111 TO PROVIDE TiFICATION Y FLORIDA UTILITY LINES iY :� � •,.,. .,,.Y. .•.. ,:. y•`� ' I. W/SPC SPECIFIED WIND LOAD RATING FIXTURES NSTALLED. (sue .. r` .... �,I • EXISTING UTILITY BO%� 5,...1.I it ,A-.-P ,. a •�.1 - •.,�'• .`��•� .Ikli•• U -OLE AS SCHEDULED u�TTAy WATT �\yf'\ ..: i �r�Yi m� OF �:_1_1, -n---L.'---III-O-O •.. :. •""w" 7'i�i T i �� p I' v INSTALLED AI D4 EDGE OF s SA N WILLI M US .1R, t PARKING /1 H ,r fj%ISTING• E-STORY BUNOAL ".T Eij 1 C W1-'' E%I POLE TYR.) I I FI;E + 1id7Mor_,•a Z, 28ASE SPACE. ^�� nNn UTILITY POLE(TYP.) I ..fl:j:,+Ii)•i:•irt}d•`l F .w" 11; " 1 �© 4e:ii:z:,,,gizzig iriiii'riii:lgagaiai»:nv-1 ,. .• a I I -- S is�:„:.: .^.' .ta,:x.:n.® , r I �T Frierdi�J"rd•Pini�i�"'.'4;?j'7.:Jw..�t^:^�'^Is.:•.f.::i: • NfQ I 2.5'-0'NIN. DOE OF PAVEMENT • IJ I n • u 1. ., S I_ b (TYPICAL) Q I PROPOSED F© '. ( I®L' V 1. Lc. r I �( I AMPHITHEATER Y7 • Z J f.f.E. 27.00 - u A. , u n n• u u L a 1 • `7/t"PVC CONDUIT(TY P). li II - © 3 J . •BI(CU)CND. < P. u 8q P. �1 u .. .. .• 1, 3/t'v 1D•CU.CND.ROD. i G W I � 17].B7''' ! o I N,�i, O LIGHT POLE DETAIL • E' R[IIPITINO FIXTURES AM NEC AS I Z ()&•4 O icNEwua1•aY'1' S SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN NV•HI•W T1'7 ° a. 1OAli.1/1,1,0. LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE 0 +w hlPell SPAO,CULTUM a.I COUPLEY LAMP FILE LUMENS LLF WATTS a I"' SYMBOL LABEL OTY.MFR.NO, DESCRIPTION C LI..I In GI. M../Mln MAR.HOLOIHANC t N ED 05 W4.400MH000" MID HOH 70'POLETL(DELAWARC) 100W CLEAR um 47115.1E5 7/000 0.77 250 PAWN0 7.I 15.7 10.05 4FP.HUMANE NTH 10A3.00 e Q 1 CV70DMH00X%5NY 0 I.,I.E 70w CLEAR Rol472I0.1E5 5700 0.77 70 WO.ON 1Y POLE(DELAWARE) BCA& AS&WWII Nwn.rle SWnnaY WA.NOLO/W. SRAv.M V.L. KD ®• MOM)5DIN175A5 ORANYILIC MICRO W/MDUNTINO BRACKET 75w CLEAR NE. 41170.IC1 5700 O77 75 A TOP IT FIXTURE AT B'A11 AT eon IT, AAI,$ nIPH:1PAOT DVLIIM.L COM^LEK • AMPHITHEATER. MLR.NOLBPHANC - am ma..LH M.. Mln M1./0OT IO CI NV7o0M NY N00KK5 DRANYILLE 7oW CLEAR MN 4E170.1E5 5700 O77 70 MTD.DN 17 WALL..,,ET I NNAPOLIS) a.m. MIDI WAL%IAT/COUTTARO DI 0.1 1.5 APR.HOLOPIIANE - Men*. DD O 1 X700 70MN FL MO uONNSTONCHIOM BASE MOUNT 150W 4H 5600 • 70 PH-1 ip 1Y IClpel— ___ _ �J JY ikri:$a•� � �• `;.s.1•ti l 'rid'`'m ,., (t � � la i; r�,,'', Is,iir,r,l dk „. 1 ,,,, , 5! illi Invoice# Dear Valued Customer: We are pleased that you have selected our columns.Rest assured,you have purchased the finest columns available,and we want your experience with CHADSWORTH'S 1.800.COLUMNS°to be pleasant and convenient.This booklet contains some very important information.Please read it carefully and follow the instructions as they are vital to the longevity of your columns.IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT YOU READ PAGES 2 AND 3 IMMEDIATELY. We have also included the specifics on handling the delivery of your order so that you can have the smoothest possible experience with the freight line.If your freight charges are collect,you will need to have a check for the carrier at the time of delivery. Please make sure that you read the installation instructions now as well as give them to the person who will actually be installing the columns.It will be absolutely necessary to follow the information contained in them. If you have any questions,please do not hesitate to call us.We sincerely appreciate your order and look forward to serving your architectural and design needs in the future. Kind regards, Sales Consultant CHADSWORTH'S 1.800.COLUMNS° P.S.Your column order is projected to ship the week of and the balance due is • Your freight has been scheduled to ship: ❑Collect,due upon delivery ❑ Prepaid by customer and will adjust after delivery ❑ Prepaid by Chadsworth CHADSWORTH'S 1.800.COLUMNS® www.columns.com 277 NORTH FRONT STREET•HISTORIC WILMINGTON,NC 28401-3907•TOLL FREE 1.800.486.2118•TELEPIIONE 1.910.763.7600•TELEFAX 1.910.763.3191 ATLANTA•LONDON SHIPPING INFORMATION PROJECTED SHIPPING DATE - Due to the many manufacturing variables, please be advised that your shipping date is only a projected date.Your order may ship before that date;however,we will try to ship within the projected week.Because we are a manufacturing company and we schedule production of column sizes together,there is a possibility that your order could be ready earlier than projected.The date that we have given is the latest expected shipping date. Once your order has been shipped, the freight company should contact you by telephone to arrange for delivery if your order is for"Residential Delivery".You may also want to contact the freight line directly.Please call your Sales Consultant if you need information before calling freight line. C.O.D.SHIPMENTS -The freight line charges a C.O.D. Collection Fee of 3-4%of the total balance due with a minimum fee of$35.00. In order to receive a significant freight discount and to avoid the C.O.D. collection fee levied by the freight line, please immediately remit the balance to P.O.Box 2618,Historic Wilmington,North Carolina 28402. Should you choose to ship your order C.O.D.,a certified check is required for all C.O.D.balances. On any stock order large enough for Chadsworth to pay the freight,C.O.D.'s are not allowed. FREIGHT INFORMATION - The carrier will only move freight to the back of the truck; you will be responsible for unloading.If you need further help,please ask us about inside delivery.Again,if your order is"Residential Delivery,"you should expect a call from the freight carrier so that you can be prepared and can arrange a time with the freight line Monday through Friday during business hours to receive your order. For "Commercial Delivery", the freight lines will only notify you upon request.We will notify you of your tracking information after your order has shipped. PRODUCT ARRIVAL-Make sure the number of boxes/crates that is listed on the Bill of Lading is the same as the number that has arrived.Make sure you have proper equipment available for unloading the truck.A forklift or crane may be necessary to unload large columns or large quantities of columns. MISSING PRODUCT-Please count the number of boxes/crates that arrive.If you did not receive the same number of boxes as listed on freight bill,note the number of missing boxes on the freight bill.Unpack all materials and see what is missing.Notify our sales office so that the new product can be sent out as quickly as possible.You must note that there is missing freight on the freight bill or the freight line will not be held responsible for replacement costs. Chadsworth is not responsible for freight lost during shipment. So,any loss must be noted directly on the freight bill.Please notify Chadsworth immediately should a problem occur. CHECK FOR DAMAGES -In the unlikely event that your columns arrive damaged,please use the following instructions for visible and concealed damage for the best results. VISIBLE DAMAGE -We cannot be responsible for loss or damage in transit. However, if visible damage should occur, we request that you refuse the damaged portion,write on the freight bill:DAMAGED GOODS IN SHIPMENT-RETURN TO SENDER,note the number of damaged boxes or columns and then sign it.At this point,Chadsworth will file a claim and reship your order.However,you must notify us of the problem. CONCEALED DAMAGE- If there are concealed damages,please immediately call the freight line and ask them to send an Inspector to inspect the damages.You may then file a claim to either replace or repair the product.Please do not dispose of any damaged units or packing materials.The freight line will inform you of the procedure to follow for completing the damage claim. Our Customer Service Department will also gladly assist you.You have 15 days to file such a claim,but the sooner you file the claim,the better it will be for you. RETURNED PRODUCT-In the unlikely event that you feel it necessary to return a product to Chadsworth,it is important for you to contact your Sales Consultant at once to receive the proper shipping instructions.You may incur additional shipping charges if this procedure is not followed.Custom or altered product may not be returned.We have a 20%+/-restocking fee. 2 Again, do not sign the freight bill until you are satisfied that all visible damage is noted and your order is complete. Once the freight bill is signed with no noted damage,you have accepted the merchandise, and Chadsworth cannot file a claim against the carrier. Also, please note on the freight bill if there is anything missing. A claim cannot be filed if the loss is not noted. Our Customer Service Department will be happy to assist you if you have any questions concerning shipping or filing a claim. It is imperative that you thoroughly inspect the entire shipment before and after unpacking units. If the bill of lading is signed with no noted damage or missing items and you later file a claim,you will receive the following letter from the freight carrier: We have completed our investigation of your claim. Unfortunately,we must respectfully decline payment of your claim. Our records indicate your shipment was delivered to the consignee without any notations of loss or damage on the delivery receipt. It is the obligation of the consignee to count and examine the condition of the shipper's containers at the time of delivery. When the carrier is given a clear delivery receipt without any notation of loss or damage, it is the responsibility of the claimant to provide evidence the loss or damage occurred in transit.After examining the evidence presented, we were unable to establish any liability on our part. We regret any inconvenience this incident may have caused.Please contact us if we may be offurther assistance. Bungalow Column Installation Instructions PAINTING&FINISHING 1.Caulk where required using Siroflex Brand DUO-SIL Urethane Acrylic Emulsion Sealant and Adhesive provided by manufacturer. 2.Putty staple and nail holes using acrylic putty or caulk. 3.Lightly sand or scuff surface of column with Scotchbrite type pad.Clean surface of column to remove any dirt or soil residue with light detergent and water,or use spray cleaner such as Windexu.Be sure soap residue is removed with clean water. 4.Apply one coat of high quality,100%acrylic latex exterior primer and one or more finish coats of high quality, 100%acrylic latex exterior paint. INSTR UCTIONPROCEDURES 1.Do not begin installation until piers are level and true.Pier must have load-bearing capacity specifed by architect. Distance between pier cap and beam bottom must be distance specified by architect. 2.THE PVC COLUMN HAS NO TESTED STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES.Column is designed to install around previously installed structural post.Structural post inside column,supplied by others,provides the load-bearing component of the column.Architect will specify load-bearing requirements of the structural post.Structural post must be of CCA treated lumber,CCA treated engineered lumber or steel. Do not use untreated lumber for structural posts. 3.Bottom of structural post should be mounted to pier using code-approved method and code-approved post anchor. Top of structural post should be mounted to beam using code-approved method and code-appproved post-to-beam mounting bracket. Structural posts resting on top of pier must be mounted in the center of the pier cap.Centerline of beam must be directly over centerline of pier below. 3 Bungalow Installation Instructions III Step 1 Step 2 0011411101110111. Step 3 Carefully open Apply a thick bead of �` Remove screws from cap,base,and shaft.Pull the"hinged"face pp y Ohm apart removable sections of cap and base. of the column.Note: the provided Siroflex Do not repeatedly Polyurethane adhesive open and dose this caulk to both edges of Caulk face of the column. the hinge miter and It is designed to be open miter of thelc opened only a couple hinged column face. of times to allow you This is a very good to slide the column adhesive for the around your struc material your column rural post,and then is made of.This caulk "close'the hinged should also be used to face like a door to do your final caulking complete the column before painting your box.It is possible \/ columns. that the"hinge"may break If it does \\./ " break,you will not have the extra convenience of the hinged face but you will still have a good miter on both edges of this face of the column.Install the now loose face as you would any other loose board to complete the closure of the column box. Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 iiesessw Now carefullyclose(or if loose, Apply Siroflex caulk to the removable portions of Now,using a pneumatic finish stapler or nailer, hold in place)the hinged face of the cap and base and slide them back into place. nail through the trim on the cap and base into the column and using a pneumatic Reinstall the screws and putty the screw holes. the column box to complete the assembly of trim stapler(recommended)or your column. pneumatic finish nailer(not as good as a stapler),nail up both faces of the left miter and both faces of the right miter.This "cross nailing"(see illustration at right)will help insure a stable joint once the Siroflex adhesive caulk has set.The staple/nail holes can be filled with lightweight spackle F or painters putty before painting. NISS -.... INSTALLATION NOTES: Delivery,Storage,Handling,and Repairs •Transport,lift,and handle columns with care,avoiding excessive stress and;preventing damage.If column is dented,fill dent with plastic automotive body filler such as Bondo®.Sand filler flush with face of column,prime,and repaint. •If column is struck by a hammer or other hard object and cracked,glue crack with 5-minute epoxy glue.Then,fill area over crack and surrounding crack with Bondo®. Installation Precautions and Methods •Temperature—Columns become more brittle in colder temperatures and are more susceptible to damage.It is recommended: that the column be warmed to 50 to 55 degrees before installing. Cutting and Fastening-Pneumatic finish nailers and staplers can be used to fasten cellular pvc parts together.Large pneumatic framing staplers and milers are not suitable for fastening this materi m al. CHADSWORTH'S 1.800.COLUMNSa www.colurnns.com 800.486.2118 BUN/5-03 C•••`••••_•••• JL090N AFTCHTEOTME NC. — 4 I'I• ° �\UIIIU//// 4 I'I Ad = PVC CAPITAL, , • • III • �:. \ I a• lin A* CA-4 • d O n•a TUBE STEEL -- - P.T.W00D BLOCKING AS ..•••'•' I I COLUMN BEYOND - RECUI RED "�"•� ` PVC CAPITAL CA-4 FASTENED m CAULK MITERED JOINTS AND TO COLUMN SHAFT W/ • PVC PLAIN PANEL FASTEN W/PNEUMATIC = - PNEUMATIC FINISH NAILER ,....a•_W_,��,�,� PER MFR. COLUMN SHAFT pggqpqqqqpllqqqqqqptl� I NAILER PER MFR. _ CAULK MATED MITERED PVC SQUARING BLOCK •I +im 1 MTII,ull ,.. JOINTS @ CROSSNAIL• FASTENED TO CONCRETE TIE �� m ( 6"-S"O.C.W/PNEUMATIC BEAM W/TAPCON MASONRY nq I /{! I011 A7.t FINISH NAILER PER MFR. SCREWS PER MFR. {�IIII TUBE STEEL COLUMN PER Il- lll J4 STRUCTURAL 1 1 1 PVC SQUARING BLOCK TUBE STEEL COLUMN PER I I ''-ggpqqqqqqqtlqqYSlltltlqqqtlqqqqq ,1 FASTENED TO CONCRETE STRUCTURAL I © ` SLAB W/TAPCON MASONRY PVC PLAIN PANEL COLUMN =- - ® SCREWS PER MFR. SHAFT 71• 7}.. —PVC PLAIN PANEL COLUMN PVC BASE BA FASTENED ............ SHAFT HALF TO COLUMN SHAFT W/ PVC BASE HALF,BA-4 _ PNEUMATIC FINISH NAILER PVC BASE.BA-4 (CAPTITAL CA-4 SIMILAR) PER MFR. MEI PH • • • d 4 a PVC BASE BA-4 FASTENED • CDCOLUMN ELEVATION O COLUMN SECTION • • • PO COLUMN SHAFT W/ PNEUMATIC FINISH NAILER SCALE.3/s,FO• 2 SCALE.3,f-0• PER no-H. Q pq„ip DAM ]2 ]� BITUTHENE LIQUID MEMBRANE I-3" TERMINATION t 11/12 PATS J, .o'-Q" COLUMN BASE AND CAPITAL DETAIL q F!-F...E.IST FLR. • lit�.�- �T�'� 3 RM.. o•n 0.1 -HYDRODUCT 220 DRAINAGE COMPOSITE ON ^ HYOROOUCT TAPE BITUTHENE 3.000 MEMBRANE II BITUTHENE PRIMER B2 COLUMN x w CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL KEYNOTES a CO PER STRUCTURAL NOTE o •- /-• I. PREFABRICATED NON-TAPERED PVC BUNGALOW U 0 g a•• COLUMN BY CHADSWORTH COLUMNS: PLAIN PANEL SHAFT, 0 0 BITUTHENE 3000,HYOROOUCT 220,HYDRODVCT COIL 600, BA-4 BASE AND CA-4 CAPITAL. INSTALL STRICTLY IN CC • ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. )"• a 4{ W PLACED.E 300R AND ANCILLARY PRODUCTS SHALL BE ¢ 6 0 HYDROOUCT COIL PLACED,FIXED AND TERMINATED AT THE CORRECT u 600 PERIMETER POSITION TO SUIT THE GROUND LEVELS.SUPPLIED BY 2. CAULK JOINTS W/ X BRAND DUO-SIC Z u3 Z DRAIN GRACE CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS AND URETHANE ACRYLIC EMULSION SEALANT AND AOHESIVER J MpI APPLIED/INSTALLED STRICTLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PER MFR. O D B pl BITUTHENE 3000 MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. 0 V C i 3 pl REINFORCEMENT 3.FILL IN NAIL AND SCREW HOLES W/AUTOMOTIVE 800Y J VM FILLER SUCH AS"BONDS". (: >• BITUTHENE LIQUID 0 O MEMBRANE FILLET 4. CLEAN COLUMN W/DENATURED ALCOHOL FOLLOWED BY O s 0 a. $El. t'-S" . •• • A WIPE DOWN W/WINDEX. DO NOT USE PAINT THINNER. 144 CO U. Y F.F.E.P17 `% I 5.APPLY ONE COAT 100a ACRYLIC LATEX EXTERIOR �� PRIMER AND ONE OR MORE FINISH COATS OF 100s ACRYLIC LATEX EXTERIOR PAINT. • NO* BITUTHENE LIQUID .41 MEMBRu:E )" .CAW AS SHOWN . - • TERMINATION (Lf• co CpAwm VL CONCRETE SLAB PER co CHm INAMS STRUCTURAL • BREPRUFE 3OGR Ci) cu.. CC PP.NO O4JOT2 O FOUNDATION WALL WATERPROOFING SYSTEM C7 emu. a SCALE.T.T/2••f-0• ° A7.4 CL s., BUNGALOW COLUMNS • PVC o r The Bungalow The Bungalow Column is made of Cellular Polyvinyl Chloride, which is unaffected by moisture and insects,and has the thickness, • `` ` "ease of use"and workability of wood.Tapered Bungalow Columns are made to your design speciftcations and built for your specific Craftsman Style house.The degree of the taper,shaft length and face style are variable and afford you unlimited design possibilities! ✓ . - ice '4 • , . 1 i c,°«* ',` i* '.‘'/ ‘... .,-+... " DES ''`1.s'i 7 "--._ g1,- t A • • £ >'y'` a„ ,ag r r a-f ..f ° .tom i a.. t s r4 - �.,.r 4Zf` .e. .Rt F i 3 F e a�ar'.�t',.` i'4d }' y: ,qg =i }•i,. i; `t` .fi �8 q �� yW,k y IY.CT �. p. :, v. ,-- - - )�-':-� I is PHOTOGRAPHY:JEFFREY L DAVIS • '' . -� ,f ` ;. I _ L'Ss ' 5, t h-F.f 3 4 +i )r i T-, .Y ° N —.c ' 6 Y,i *y t :A• & i : w n""+^' .tr,. a_i„ •3 ,- *4 j _9 j . � ' 'A r :.s" ' w1 -;,-;•; ?�9 • g • e ;.ii`` •'t:i' v � r: n r. , $ r, i ,,,,,,.• — - ,,• ,t 1 —.. •,. v:sx` , 4 , [ t Design No.372 Raised Panel FM -- —^^— ^ S 4 �a� ,_�_. �i],' Mil 11 III PHOTOGRAPHY:JEFFREY L DAVIS 1.800.COLUMNS •www.columns.co;n .BUNGALOW COLUMNS • PVC :._ Bungalow Columns•PVC Size Plain Raised Recessed q ' 12"x 4' $258 $333 $497 - i- = 12"x 6' 331 426 638 �,I 12"x 8' 397 493 740 ; 12"x 10' 478 672 1,006 'i? 6"'<� a 14"x 4' 308 403 605 $ .:', 14"x 6' 387 482 723 a};,, ';; ' "' 14"x 8' 474 570 854 :i• i 14"x 10' 630 759 1,137 ''4 16"x 4' 345 441 661 16"x 6' 432 528 792 16"x 8' 528 624 933 , r ' 16"x 10' 703 832 1,245 ; 4 18"x 4' 410 505 757 } , 18"x 6' 511 607 909 : . ,.!:';..1 18"x 8' 617 713 1,069 1 18"x 10' 792 921 1,380 20"x 4' 447 543 813 ; 20"x 6' 555 653 977 ,J i 1% 20"x 8' 680 778 1,164 f i 20"x 10' 867 996 1,493 4 22"x 4' 480 576 863 i - (. 22"x 6' 605 701 1,050 ; '_'” • 22"x 8' 734 830 1,243 , i . ,l 22"x 10' 942 1,071 1,607 • t 1 24"x 4' 514 611 915 , • 24"x 6' 655 751 1,125 a 4 24"x 8' 794 890 1,335 ` 'S i• , 24"x 10' 1,004 1,131 1,696 Other sizes available. Prices subject to change without notice. B ' Design No.371 Recessed Panel Design No.370 Plain Panel ilvailable in Recessed,Rasised or P/ain Panel Designs. Bungalow Capitals&Bases CA-1 CA-2 CA-3 CA-4 CA-5 CA-6 CA-7 I O 1 1 ll 1 1 � ,I I1i 1' ) ( '1 c 1 ? I I I , 0 BA-1 BA-2 BA-3 BA-4 BA-5 BA-6 BA-7 I o rii I ,I I, I I, ,1 ,I I, 1� 4 I 1 1 If If , I I I I/ I � 0 Cap and base molding available in varying degrees of thickness. 1.800.486.2118•www.columns.com Virginia Railing and Gates: Aluminum Wood-Style Handrails,Railings, and Rails Page 1 of 4 j-_,,.. , -..,,,,_ ,...._—_ ,, . =,-.... Phone: 804-798-8777 I 11042 Airpark Rd. Search Site I� RA �ILING Et GATE Ashland, Virginia, 23005 Home Company v Products Contact Us Information Site Map 'r Handrails Gates Fences Home And Garden Security 1 Components My Favorites ALUMINUM WOOD-STYLE HANDRAILS, RAILINGS, AND RAILS All Railings Aluminum The Americana Collection Brass Handrails I HA1420 ,' Cable Commercial Exterior ii 0 Request Price Information Add to My Favorites Imitation wood style aluminum handrails are used as a Glass ;, . 3 '�- ,� - ''t standard minimal traditional wood railings found on ma Interior II.,;;' ,, f 7;'Yf —..-+ more new homes are using materials that resist corrosi Pipe I i;, ' aluminum handrail is a perfect compliment by offering Porch 11 I I a i =r,I l , . sturdiness with the stylistic benefits of a traditional woc Residential ' ,- exterior porch railing offers unmatched strength and to •1= available in a number of durable color finishes provided Spiral Gates, including aliphatic acrylic urethane gloss and po Steel ' meets stylistic requirements for the following houses. c Wood Style . q traditional, colonial, rancher, and others.This product r Site Map = 4 � � requirements including the following critical requiremer s ^�a - ICC/ANSI 505.3,ADAAG 4.26.2,ADAAG 4.26.3,ADAAC - ,. f� , , - Product Specifications : rr 11', Components Post Aluminum tubing used for large wood-style handrail: '1 T 7 _ `': Cross-Section Shape: Square C:xiil Material Outside Width: 3 Inches attn u t u a_ *r+ - Component ID: MA0006 , .t, ` ez.ra> rower , Topbar Aluminum woods le to bar grab bar to replace stt � � � �� � ty P / P 1.17.,-, ,� 7 ' ,_ handrails "- ' ... Material Outside Width: 2.5Inches Component ID: MA0023 ,. ;: sa ` ' a � It ir "itt1l pifil I lilLL 1;.� , ..... 1 lit The Americana Collection Handrails I HA1630 httn://www.viruiniarailinaanrluatec rnm/handrailc wnnrililra acn Qi10i')nnQ Virginia Railing and Gates: Aluminum Wood-Style Handrails,Railings, and Rails Page 2 of 4 z„%,i ,, 0 Request Price Information Add to My Favorites This aluminum balcony safety railing uses Virgini=:.. -1 _Y' style aluminum components to offer unmatched { I maintaining the classic colonial look required by �t�tlV ,, ,, ' a i , , architectural structures. Product Specifications'Few imm, ,��` Components �' ., Topbar f * t Aluminum woodstyle topbar/grab bar to replace stt a _` L s handrails w; � Material Outside Width: 2.5 Inches Component ID: MA0023 Post Aluminum tubing post used to secure railings s Cross-Section Shape: Square Material Outside Width: 2.5 Inches Component ID: MA0025 1/4" ,, . 114 n- IA 10 a stiW IN,- _.:*thi P9 =krsr^�:• �,.;a tea: il The Americana Handrails Collection Handrails I HA2090 - ^ - '" ` " -� Request Price Information Add to My Favorites This all-aluminum wood-style railing comes with mount "-,` "''''"' '"'" $-` "-" — pyramid post caps, and decorative aluminum pickets.T variety of colors and usually ships in 3 weeks.This raili or exterior purposes. Product Specifications Components Picket Decorative picket ;.."--'• Cross-Section Shape: Square ✓woo✓ Material Outside Width: 1 Inch Component ID: MA0018 11111.1 The Americana Collection Handrails I HA1430 127 Request Price Information Add to My Favorites Wood style aluminum porch railing on a Cape Cod hous Product Specifications Components Call Virginia Railing and Gates at 804-798-8777 for i httn•//urvcnu I irc iniarailinaanrloat, c rnm/harnrlra;lc ,wnrsrl1;Lc ac, o/nninAno • Virginia Railing and Gates: Aluminum Wood-Style Handrails,Railings, and Rails Page 3 of 4 „ qq R' r h s 1 - :�2Li"ems- y S j ha3 Illr ll . 1tilAm Itii !1i! h y f The Americana Collection -. Handrails ( HA2080 - 6 yy_- � ' 1 �7 Request Price Information Add to My Favorites # ES Aluminum wood-style railings mimick the look of wood 0. l-d ' _ �� t* lou _ appearance of traditional American handrails, combinin rye. *1Hira - Product Specifications �� , ' " it - Components " _ f Call Virginia Railing and Gates at 804 798 8777 for l a � �I L:i{t l l{.E;AIt(1 T$it gY- i .� --�,.. s �.q ii...—— �, ?1ilEi ai G ,�3II,s€11'.,: sj- The Americana Handrails Collection v Handrails I HA2210 Request Price Information Add to My Favorites Aluminum wood rails.These railings identically rese mbl aspect. All the benefits of a traditional railing without tt Product Specifications Compts Post Aluminumonen tubing used for large wood-style handrail: Cross Section Shape: Square Material Outside Width: 3 Inches Component ID: MA0006 Topbar httn•/%xnxnxw virainiarai1in eland ciatac rnm/hanrlrailc :i, lil,- acr. 0i1ei'in110 Virginia Railing and Gates: Aluminum Wood-Style Handrails, Railings, and Rails Page 4 of 4 Wood-style aluminum molded topbar Material Outside Width: 2.25 Inches Component ID: MA0011 Picket Aluminum picket Cross Section Shape: Square € r j' Material Outside Width: 1 Inches ,3 Component ID: MA0027 ki The Americana Handrails Collection c Handrails I HA2240 E1 Request Price Information Add to My Favorites ] =ram Aluminum wood rails.These railings identically resembl aspect. All the benefits of a traditional railing without tt Product Specifications h Components - -, Call Virginia Railing and Gates at 804-798-877 1111111 Aluminum Wood-Style Handrails,Railings,and Rails Copyright©2008,Virginia Railing and Gates, LLC. httn'//www viroiniarailinaanrlaatac rnrnMandrailc .x,nnrll;lra acr% oinninnno CITY OF DELRAY BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD ORDER In Re: 75 —/ O a) 411 - (applicant's name and address) ORDER > Followin consideration of all the evidence and testimony presented at the ZxX (date) meeting before the Historic Preservation Board for the City of Delray B ach and pursuant to Section(s) 2.4.6(H), 4.5.1, and/or 4.5.1(J) of the Land Development Regulations and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Delray Beach, the Historic Preservation Board finds that there is ample and co pe nt substantial evidence to s oo i findings that the application for �(� 5 $t' o2/ L C20- -, n"�) property referenced above is hereby 17 granted denied by a vote of / - . Pursuant to LDR Sections 2.4.7(E)(1) and 2.4.7(E)(3)(a), a decision of the Historic Preservation Board may be appealed to the City Commission so long as a letter of appeal is received by the City Clerk within ten (10) working days of the action being appealed. ased on the entire r cord before it, the Historic Preservation Board adopts this Order this day of , 200 . Chair Historic Preservation Board copies to: (applicant) a HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT Property Owner: Gregory Paige Authorized Agent: Metal Shield, LLC Property Address: 246 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District HPB Meeting: September 4, 2008 File No: 2008-225-COA ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of accordion shutters on a non-contributing structure located at 246 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H). BACKGROUND/PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject property consists of Block 10, Lot 6, Del-Ida Park, and contains a one-story circa 1969 CBS structure. The building is considered a non-contributing building in the Del-Ida Park Historic District and is currently zoned Residential Office (RO). In 2003, administrative approval was given for the installation of aluminum awning windows, and in 2005, administrative approval was given for the replacement of a shed. The current proposal involves the installation of aluminum accordion shutters to fourteen (14) openings which include thirteen (13) windows, and one sliding glass door, in addition to four (4) aluminum panels with permanent tracks attached to the wall and located within the gable vents of the non-contributing duplex. Currently, the structure has hurricane protection for many of the existing openings which consists of removable panels and permanent tracks, which are painted to match the color of the building. The proposed accordion shutters are ivory, and the tracks for the removable panels are white. ANALYSIS Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H)(5), Prior to approval, a finding must be made that any Certificate of Appropriateness which is to be approved is consistent with Historic Preservation purposes pursuant to Objective A-4 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and specifically with provisions of Section 4.5.1, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. LDR Section 4.5.1(E) provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features as follows: (E) Development Standards: All development regardless of use within individually designated historic properties and/or properties located within historic districts, whether contributing or noncontributing, residential or nonresidential, shall comply with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, these regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. ;,R V Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(2)(c)(4), Major and Minor Development, the subject application is considered "Minor Development" as it is "the alteration of any part of the front façade of an existing noncontributing residential structure." (5) Standards and Guidelines. A historic site, building, structure, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall only be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, as amended from time to time. The following Visual Compatibility Standard applies to the subject application: (g) Relationship of Materials, Texture, and Color: The relationship of materials, texture, and color of the facade of a building and/or hardscaping shall be visually compatible with the predominant materials used in the historic buildings and structures within the subject historic district. Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines state and recommend the following with respect to hurricane protection: • Window shutters that are removable are preferred. • If the tracks are to be installed year-round, they should be painted to match the exterior surface. • Accordion or roll-down shutters should only be considered when they are in locations not visible from the public right-of-way. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation recommend the following: The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. (Standard #2) Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a historic property shall be preserved. (Standard #5) Exterior alterations, including shutters, whether serving a purpose or not, should respect the character of the building and be sensitive to its architectural integrity. Permanent shutters visible from the right-of-way not only have a visual impact on the structure but also obscure additional detailing within the window frame which then has the potential to conceal any significant architectural features. Removable hurricane shutters are the preferred option for all buildings in historic areas as they are not visually impacting. Therefore, in accordance with the Design Guidelines and Standards noted above, it is recommended that the existing removable storm panels be maintained or replaced and the tracks painted to match the exterior of the structure or that some other appropriate method of storm protection is installed for those windows visible from the right-of-way, such as a hurricane-rated fabric protection. The request to approve those accordion shutters visible from the right of way cannot be supported as it is inconsistent with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(8)(g), the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. t 3 III _t " ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of COA-2008-225 for 246 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. C. Move denial of COA-2008-225 for 246 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. (Motion to be phrased in the affirmative. See above) RECOMMENDATION Conditionally approve COA-2008-225 for 246 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation that the existing removable storm panels be maintained or replaced and the tracks painted to match the exterior of the structure or that some other appropriate method of storm protection be installed for those windows visible from the right-of-way. Report Prepared by:Amy E.Alvarez, Historic Preservation Planner Attachments: • Location Map • Photographs • Shutter Application Diagram LL, z111 / 7 ,._ ,, L11 7 w. • GEORGE BUSH BOULEVARD I .N.E. QP �JP Q Q Q°J 1 7TH ST. , i Q .} 1111111 1 N.E. 77 0 N.Em _ . 6TH ST. z ' • [2 G� O ___ [7,,,, , , __„40 46, 0 1 cn N.E. 5TH TERR. N.E. _ Al I I o1 1 ,,, 411‘ — , N/ ,- ,? , ��\� N.E. 5TH CT. . '� 7 k I J • ,,,, ...___, (f) kit • hi Li _..., im q_,, >: ,iii :: ‹,, , N.E 5TH ST. 1 D N.E. 4TH I mg , ST. j � � N SUBJECT PROPERTY —,- 246 DIXIE BOULEVARD tt ----• :' !r PLANNING AND ZONING 12-43-46-09-29-010-0060 LOCATION MAP 4'qy g�P DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: S:\Planning & Zoning\DBMS\File—Cab\Z—LM 7001-7500\LM1085_246 Dixie Blvd. ..., •...--..44er.1.:r... ....rot*xl„••••s• . •,, .,;' '' “*5-1/1,01, ' . ir,-1„..-'„.,.; , , ,,•!,' 4-,,,-,:,7 "• ,..•t-tA• ,:.. • • ,y i .•„,, . t• .• ',, -,‘-:, ,,.."'N.- ' /4 :e."1:, .1*.‘)• , • ,••,:•.-4"'“fts''''.•-•'14. ' ; 1",/,!. . , .w.. , „•, .',...-" '.•,r fto.,... i•,,,!., .04 ...•,.4.- . "\,..'.0• ii..0 , .• ,•.•,..,:'‘,.,, I/-I1 t1„7'.,..,:,,,•' •'.i\,i!.,:.r,I/,\.,,..•s,,'!'.s.•....•'.,i,:s•,l4,-`,.-4',.t A..:•,,.,;-%,",.7,.,N,.:'$h i,•:,1•.,,,‘'.'.,l.,..t,.i,t.,.h:•,,Ir,,r,.a.:ii;-1‘,.,.k.4s.',,'y.,''",.'',..4.i.,..',.4..,iy).,...4.7'7•'./..4,,,..,,/•'•,..;,.-,\-...-,-/,,-.-.-s.'..,,...'i,i'.s,'•.,'"','s..`:,‘s•1,N'‘,.4,.,i1 i.-‘•V nii+••P••-•.•:,.•„.•,'4„f4;,f,'••,,".?/,1.,.,'1 k•L,,,1‘;,,4'4"..,,.7.,'..:. •'t.'t'q4‘1•N 1-t' 1. ,; i,,t.,i i,k.oc,,,,i k,..i4.ys;.r,.,,,.°.,.G..-....1.1.,..._•..;.'.,,-1 i"jq ii•,,.'e1..,.-.-.,.i-,,„T.,„'.-14,,,•-.,:,.,.,„',,1',..,.,,,,.,,',,1%, ,•.•,1•,., ':••i••-•,•,,*.^4,i.•'s9',.i'4t,t•,'1.I-,,.-i,. , — , / " 'x 41 ,,L 541 -.-,r4.T,..,,4- •,'.s:y.''...,"t",,t,I•.r fr.'r.'.••.''l l,1,1f" •.-",'., • ' ‘,.;•-.4..,...`.,.,,,/•.r'.-...•;.'."i,!..,.Act,-„C.,a.4,l,.$1...,-,r,,l,!,i,,•,'.[.:e;,,,-„, f,,, -7f-,e`.',;•,-',''','-f'!A, ,.),.,, ..,.,,\›!-•„,'..A7-.0- • :j'i,i.,'it.. .•,,...:,,,,,7 ,.7‘....; ....t....,':"„lb.‘,.'. s., ;ilt.,1/40 it'',..,-, * . ,,i Ir'l 1 ....a.' .• •'/..g:L;ife..4,1:":17v- •:"*.f• 'VA, .''''''41.,' • 1,:'. ''i'''' ‘. s , ' i • • :41.Nkt, . •••' • - ,.• ,., . ,,•., v- ,f1. .." ' ,f7i.:1,J.,,I. I'A/.'?.ai 1,NS'., . •.• ...,.. • .1.• .,.... •.,••0,!-.....,.,•• di fi f I( ';.>"* .„"'"..,k;1.- ,,,t,...,, , , • . 1 i • ,. .- V. •.4,-4,•it'...t:, /'',..Z.-.Z Yirs20,V1/14 ,..1>;,, i,?*-'.•4. "41.','• 1'.• l' -....'' .t•'.••'• S. '' ', .17.0).',.• . 1,' .4_,.,..*- ,•61f4Igi,' ;.. .-•` ...r.! .- ,'• tir, •-,' l',-; . . /.,—. , - ;',-••'it—?fi',: '-• ' r::* • l I.-'44..'.' . V)• ..... AA ''''''. tr.;494C\".. ' tVtl.P.444.ir,..1-1`•%.: • ••'..."•' ' ,' •• ?;"./.."''.:,i'•., 014 x's,,143•••%,1;',"!5"1,/,."1:•:F.r..Aits*" '.:=...1114.,. 1.44,,,t)yi,,•i A/If I ``,•;,..:•,.1/2 l• ..' ."::-.":-r'llt,:•*5." • •,•4..._ iitt:',' '•-•''`,.'•..1, ••.., ,2..AT,,,.j...*.. t,:•.`r"..,•'/..,,c4( ...,,,,. „ti,fit.„;,-p,-, 070$C,,•,••:;!,.., ' •..-• ,. : 11; A'sss, -.4044,14' ..fsit,'.Ai'S.s3t.V.P7-4;/." ',.'''''VO4/I,i'li.'-e.• * '' ,, ef,„t:,,,,At,: ... ..•,,..,.. ;;;;-:.is.:-'.• -.• , . I , "-44‘,.-",4...4K,.....4r`!,.•!.".:4,...4 • xy.; •!' •• -...,e.,,, ‘.aii"..,,;,,,,,,,,,,,.;.,„4...,,,,,n,,,,,.. ...,,--Iy.--.. .../ ,. ,_. , ,...... --„, •-•, - • .. .,,, - 4.,,,,. . .:),,::.,1, .,:;•• ,,,,.... _,,., , , . .. „1....,"._„'t• .'•'.-,, -^ .._ -•-•-„, -- .ip.. '. 1 ,r,..,,,....14-.•,... gyt,„......„.. :• „,•• •- ..hil,lit!.•',..„..,„. l' ,'--"" 3.." .4. • r.4 .„ ,„,:,•,•h,c•i',,11.,,-...e a'.' :',.,i-s-r,7,-,7,:--.;'_, : , ,.1,,,l' .,'',... .4t,_',•:1;`•.•?,....' " •••:1,4•4';'-iwg . ••••t.;."•",''„•!, ••.4•,,,•ii...'„ . ---.._ --,., -..,,...,.,,-..•<,.:.:;•;,.-. :.-4. •-•••, ,,lin,-;:iri• ,, --, • :- ,,?,,f„., 7, -4-7,:;/,'. --- .•'-01',144 ' u:' '‘ ,41."' s i.• ••••••4.''' ;s•,..f.. 'TS• CI , ..44,,Ir-VI"•• s:'::•'' T'N',,,I;fil•A.‘y,,,es . ,1,,,, • ',,S ' , f',' •• : • •• ,,, , -.,,, ""-..„..., .."41'..• • • ..„':t1r,e411., . :1,:-/:•.•,„411,011,k•,• ,'i ' , '1,4,,,ss' ,,,'',',',,'''',V. .',•• i „sr. •i '.-,.4 V. .4'',a0, Ait'.' --f t • I.- ,'".:.- -•cns.,-;',.•..:* .„,-.. ,••••t,'',, ' • • ',' ,.''.•t=• 7.''.• .... ',-. • -.::.•'''.%:';‘-,t'''. •Wad'' ' - ,3:.4 -. ".3.,' - ',•.; •. (... -,..'.''...•41;0904 . -1,, .1 •t -,,irt.•s 7 7 • . ,, ly t- :- -,..-:;,,,. --.,....7,7:•/*,,,,,77:, •4 4 4.... ''• ..-.,,,;-• '''••, ' ' • , .. ..''....,•..1..,,)-.. ,---....,,•-•,,,,,. '-,,I.tr.,.re.:,•,:21,01,,Ar,.. ..,, ...7.# .}.,-..:: ..k.,: ,-... •- .!•••.) ' `' ' , if-1,..' I r ..,';'1; t7: •-4'..-=Z•ti•••:-"-:' -.4$•„: '. -'-k• ',4 .'',..t. , i . ' . •'... '. l,' :.;,- -:-. ,, ----,...,. 'te,' .. • ', ,..,, .. ',, ,...t, s'' ,' .,'441%,'....Ir wA 1*--; * '' .r•''?I',.if• ..';',/if''.••\''''' ' 0,`'4.!'' ‘'‘'''„"' '' ,. 4 ' ' !" .! s.' ... •., • , , , '• •'.-(',',-.2 •-'',, "•-•''''•-,._.4.` • .i. ....... ,,,..-"'\•' ''''''' * sit •4' '' •,.; . •`\.,..., ,' •' '.', ..,0,s,L:•,, ,,k\.‘,..); „,,,sd,-. ,,,..,-;:-..;-,,',,,,:;,;,.•,„tv i. •,,...ti,'"--- 4 4.' *F...4''','4'''''.''' ke\I ii 1 ' V.A).k 14.k 1..1, ' .'''': '''.:'4 4. i ,,vite,„ -..... • "i{ — . ••••••-• ....., t!.,.•;', ;4'1”•• '''.....- I., .:.- ,•,. '';' ,.•••:.;!:',',, '',.'1114tos`‘ (7,,iltri.t.4.:',......,'1..e•t•i„1 7 . ',': '7' "'. t' ''' . •,,).'' •• Arp- •.„!,:,,,,it' ';•;' . ., , ..•'t•I .,, .',. ',."•-••.'''''---,,,,' '''•••••••.-.•,-.:,,. ' .. , t„.„.- 1,...;•;',9.....- _40,,,, • .t. ......11 1 !, " 't. ,146.s.41,.; - t.,t...,...,.r, •.... -,.,, 1* ,, .. 1.,,,,f,...',I'','',' ' ;:-"---V.-,,,- ' 4—.:,,t '.•'..,,it' •:..-'' .,1:o"-.-j,,,-- ;-4.' .. . '.,., !,4%41 T. • ..--"!--'-.-. ."-• 1t/•-•-•-• '.•" -''' '' . ' • ''', ' . ••-•-- '''.+. '''''';‘,,,'''."'''' •.; -•'•'•':-..r. rnlb - ; 'i4'.‘;-... ' if.t.,0'I'li' 's f• ,• -' •' . : .`;•‘y , r+,-,,'".•,,.t'.'",e,'.,--' ..••=:7--------:---7.1-=":7:.::-.:2- ''...kt '-•`'\tir.'‘ ,,'..' ' 't..'. . '''':.*-: - 1- •'• • ...• ,I)'' -w,'.S.' i-;;;.,'.- '- r0.1,,,'• . ‘,' ,Yki."'"'"A .st`'....' ' ,'-:' ..... ...,; .i 7.2-:`?..--76!---•' ' '' +' • -, - , ---.,:•.-!',,, ,`,'.• '.., pC''''' ,,,:,,' '-,Ii.. ,. ;14 ). 4,',..,...„,'-;"----4- :...f. '.'"''t• r.. . ',,,,,p,,, 4..i 4 • ,%.-4'.%.:-;'" '•'" -,41,;''i'-:..,'t!7':.•','':','1-14:,-..-I.,'..:.-r,-,.:'.:.,...'..„/.»T...".P...,';..',.'\:.''.,.'.'.,‘"-V''.^,;''..,..,'','.'.„..,'.4...•:.-:..,•.•.i.'•..;'•l.'-'..‘.:.,.',.'.,'..•.,.;,t.s.'s'.>.c.l'..is''-Ii;,ii4‘.'I 44'.1 41•I`1•1.•':..-..4.-;1•'ir'','.,'- ,,!.`e.e,_.Ak•':,•."'1',.1/4',..,"..k.•. ..ii-„'t--a.4s,,.-)•I'. 4•," •.i.,,.o,,'I't.':t,,,,''t't-;.." _ _ p•--4-'',.''.-!'.Cs'-;•.••.•.1.•'":%••',''•"i'',.'."..?4t1..1...'i•'0.4,..,".•,,-1,•.:•,,,/I.(•'".,.;.t1,', ',"'‘.1:.''"'.','.'''.Z.;.....,0.i,7..A.,:V‘,.,',•„,•;-.,,'•':v.'ei,'s..,:.:.r7;.4'''‘...;..',,1*,-;'\'•',..,1-.,'•.'•'.,,;4..x-:.N,.-1...'0,..4•,'..z......,.4#'„.,ei.1'.•V'.'441!,1',.•,`,•'.',•1%'t`-4,•i.o-`'1"•,.-,-'.7••-.;..i•i,.••1.,•-:•,4,",„•''...s'.a•,';',.1'-'s--,..';4`a.,.4',,.,;7,•„i"•."•7-,-7-..'.,"2-iC---,'•-c,-.1t'-.--...i:-",.-,'.-•,..:,.-*,1i,I.:-.‘.,....•'.-.t.;2-;'--',4-',..•..-°....•-,1-_1,-7-.--",--:.t,'...-.-'r..,:-0't,,;••...'..,...'.N,,_1,.,.,.:;..•.-•i,.`.'l.:-.'.,•-,,r,-,‘:":..7s-"---•:-•.....-.1.%:./.----:.-'--i-'3.-;-.--"-;;'-,`-,-;A-;-I:'-',-„/•:„.,-. . ."•''.‘.'.''.•4'.;`,S,,0,•.-,.-.'4'.4---4N•.-•4:.:'4-•srh4r-';y-,"`,'•'-'+'.-."''.•'."7.".,!:;.'-7 71,.,1..4k—-'''7'4'-'',.''-'.-•.,-'4-h';•:l''..:r.-;-.,•':-,-,•'•-:•.i''-10•r...,'i-''1''''12;'.-.'..',',.i1•'.-',,-,:.1-0'''.',‘,.'.n--.,.rC-,".-i,.;•-'•.T-',,.,•':;.,i.:-",-P?••,•..c"•-4••.•.'•.--.',,17-•r,'•,,'`.'._.•-".:',,'.•-.•.•i,1 1,e 1.'.,e'1',,1..'.,2-7i.•f',;j 1,',-:,.i.-,;.:..41/.—.',/,.k,.,._,-••'.,-,•:..,Y:„-'.,,;,`-••,-,:>,.,'-,4 1,•,L..-,.•,--,-'.,:(:,,g,C-,',,,',.,,,,,.'.1,'.,,•.t-i,'',,-.,',I•`,'•.,.,•,''';3L s.,,-,.,•,,",,,•',-."l',:.:.,k,,;"f.I.!.,',tL"•,\,.,..7,..0'-;.i.',h','7,•/:,I.'r,,,-'„/-s,„•,,.',:f2,._•;_-".'.„•;-: . ;, • •-' 1 ,.,.t4...,,,t••q.:,,".,,1,..,:-"',;,,•.-.,`:,'--.-'•-'t-•.,.'',-.-',z',;'1.i..4,-..:..7r'..:.-.,.,'.,.,,.'1.,)'...-';i=..•.-',-7..-";=.-...7.."a..-'-•'.. .•'-.-.:_.,-..',„.t:'..,-i.:'':. -.-,'-•:.;'',•'.*'•-4*'.,..;'•P4,•-•-'•'.•1 M.4•".,.-•'.,•,.e';..„''''".,.,...'._N-;.',`.,,n'.,.'"','„••,.".,t':.,,.‘-,"4t:•..‘.,• .-..t,-7..4•„,,•.•a.1,',•;••,,.,:4.•..ii,:." '-..„ 7 - '' - 4 z t. : „ 16 ' . / r‘ ,, • - ..-J....-..'_.',..,.'-_.'—.,._.','•s.._,,-'.,_.,'.._.-m,.!-_.„.-.=....''.'...449 ; r 1, 44 k i \ _ 0 - .,!„—,.1..'.,.'• ,.,.'.N.'.,',.';4--',.;-..'.1f..Li!.,''•'a.',„k_-Ii'.,.,•,'[.1 .,..1==----.=.,,,-_-,—•- _,.7---_.-_.„--..--_-..-_-.—=-.E_.7=-,-__•_-.-•,_._-,..•.,—_•-:,._---4__.•E:•.,,--.,-:..,.z_,1.-,-:....- :,. ,'•:-•'' '.•!4.,,e,'•,,:-:,.S,'.,$,,' •'.'t.,!....,:.•,.,-•e!•:.••!.-..t;..',.,>!.4---.,;;.•i4..,-1.,t. i? . ,"..••s a*••• ;• ' ' ''• '••A '•• ' •,,`• 'It I, 'lk - -, ' ..,,--'..,•-;*:•4 •••••••.:k •-•-z!'5 -•.: '* - _. -71116-- •' . ..,:-.1,9..,rs-e •.. . ;Op"e , ..,4,, ..'!" •••••".210-• •"',,,r'' , • •..! ' '',i1 .„ .. .., 94,f. , .,,,i'.. :-- ' .. , ' lorT-I'''''.`4 4$7, ,•• .-;.- x. -0.,,.'•-.‘IL'?'!if ' .si.k. - --- „ - ,:: .- _,..,': ...-..`:._.,, ', r-7-, , •,; -. - ....,‘;. ait• a* '`•'.:;`-',..• ',„:4' •,.•''' . --4: •..,.1.•?•• -, ... - '" '• •••.,-;•••.;., ..e'l.". 4.:,.',...•%N ',•••••'‘' • . "•*--- 44034tw, i .C''';',., ..1 ''-';:•,s, " •t;,S. '. ' '''••••-',-; .'[...0 .••' :'i•J''''' ''''•''''', ,A..,,st'S'e`:fr:4t'' ''' ''''''' '" ', ' •,;`,`,•,:, ''''.. , , ,, ''.•' ..,,,,,,,,'• ...._. - '" ''.111(Ntit , •=1 ..,4 te,1-1:.?"t, .\,;,.-; •-4'.-/,if-- .ti;r4,'•i 1.„.„1 . ,-, • ,,•,, i-44;1,; • At . ., ..• 'or - .. ,-• 1,' ., ...),,_,,, ' • ., .!;..•;••",,r4.'•, . . •' •-•:',1 - ,, ,,,..,.,, _, r,,, , ,.,,. .. ., ../.:,:.0:.,„;.,,,,,,'4.•;,,,,,,li, !.,,s•-•$•:......i„,'X..; ./ ,4' - ';',. 's- 4 ' t• A, . .. ....• ....._ ','"'.,,,_ __'4,W. A';;..,,t,..- - /,'",,...il ii. ',"S'il.,..% .•' t,-.P7.1/...-.74.,,OPIt., ' ,,k,if,,/.',P''-' ... ' -,',...4 '210 4.„,„*„,...,... i)„, •,.,.. . .....,_.......... • , ,,,.„.. ,tii(' . • .4 •Y j f..,-.''',•'' . z " s P. ,,./•`:(;;',..-,,, ,./441?,:,,,,morrot.. ,,-, , ., • ,F. '''' =':'i...,' '97,4::..!!:;-:1) ' ,; '4.,,'.,11+ . - -. .. •,..'' , .', , ' - , ,;.1.,,i.,,,,•.,, ,,.. - ; , ''A..'• '''".'•41'. • s • "ti ''• it`' VI..t I), '1".•4'.''. •-'. ',"I IS*' „ .." • .. . ' ' •••'''0'.*4164,4'ss:s•,f.,. .‘"" , ' 4, , . . . ...c4,,, .y,t,,,,,A,.... 4 • .,, ,,,... -; . .,.••••,: ' ' , ,,,', ,s,\•,..‘„::,.,;, , .,•,'..4;-;•,,,i4:6r:',';'!,, It: 4; ,..-- )., ,. '.1!" .-''i,, . . ..... ,,,.. ..... .-- ';•,,:( . '. . •V•••„,' .'!,4 11,:,'',..•"4,4?!.."f'...4..09.,,t1;.; . . .ils''•,.!,' ,,'. !...:‹.:,:•.: •• 4, ',..". s '' ; ,..1. ;lira .••,41102Siip• ' s'''.. , ',.:;,'"A;,,.•: ., ,,..,.,,, i ! ", 2•''''''5.' ''. '•:;41111'.,tti;4.1*;'14,,,,,i;,.",•' , %,"‘'' _ , . ''. 11 ....f.":". '-il..7,. ' ".-';' P_Ilavo,170 ,"'%'• . '''..-...h.,,;': '.'.''''. ,,'1. , , ,•44', :14,,,,•:, •,,.• •-'-* ..4-: "-. ',' .-'I i,.;'•••,,.,. ;, 1,," •r ',P4.,, ;'1.,- r .• • 'j,.,,, ' -3 ,k,,i't:' l . = t,** '.... '.01,"."4,...;,: '. e'..'.;,... . •,' . . . , , ''4i,,,.,.,k ' ;`..,2,;", "' ''.., ' '•••,......,,k'/'^, ,,, ..'14:;"" / sr'''• - „ . ,ti",,,, 1,.'' ,i' ,,,',..t ' 'u`•-*"...,'•-..: ''.•• -. . .r..,'!" re'r:',","*+*.re,VMSIL. ...0)\\\ "v:'- ',,•;:4 ,111:,,r. ';'"i•,^"'- ". 4,01.'er,,liq, .a.,1,..A.'Y,,.k,•ez,,',.,;;; :•*. -,..- •. „,. '-' . , ' ' . ..•, ... :, '''4 111 ''' ''.: '"-4-- '''''.--- -,`:-.'"7-',.' ...^ ,' ".,A.,,,a?...,.9iawr:,',,k,7,:.::i;'-'.,,,,.''..,„f,, ",t.,,, ..., *. . ',.'2. ...' ...,:.: ,,:.-- ,•''' . - : ' -- _ .'' - .,•47'.,-).. .,,i;,.., 4:'i•'; 0,-• ,..' . ,,,..,,,,,....,,,,, .. .,,,.A.,,::4( ,N.',4.1::::',,,,,,,/ltfii:*"1.''''''',;,,A.I.:e',.,, :4.,,,...., .......... ,/',,.. ,7,1,,,I;t4410400, alp......,............'..::'° rt"t''''',e04,:'' ''' 7• --:....__ ..,...: .1 2.. ...... • `e...-..•,.-••'.*... : .".•"•;;--.1"-"'''''-"• eN•tr,„a,;,•.:17,-„,..4."' '•!i•;',••••,--.0<r4., •••‘t•,, - •• '1.!..Z - ', .•••••.a•' ,••• • - _„.„ , . . ,.. ,• . , -. . . , . i ‘'‘),t4.\•..-.,--,,;•,...j. V.r•.,,e,..!..*,,y-eir.4:'::...\•40... :•; . '4"4*'••''''l )..,..; -. ...•',. :.• -;''' --••---..- _: -- - '-• - ; - : -:: ' '• ..._:. . -- ._ ' 1211 V`-. " - • .i.tr,'',.•.:. , tet-re4S-4,.ey, .,•.? . -••' -,..?•-•.::,••;':.•• -• , '• ,,.."'',-,,•4•••!'••''•"" ' .*:.-.11/4% ' _ •••. Ir•t,;;• • - ..., •:1..44 , -- ••!. ..,";1•••"--.•'-''' • - ,rq". - ``..'• '''.3. ' •.1 i i‘•••,-:_r_471,4*.Z.,A00*•-,,hrt.,. . -.. ,,....•*.- ' " - ' • ...•• •, . r .:•, ••.:,1,P,i;f0....-4.-,,-- `•,..-. ..W.,--.40,*!.* G G P" ( - i--/- '�o q �-? L/ ) xf/T .1- 1, _JD ,.�t) mow. 3��J 4k • 7k �b tL>V 1 � 11 .1 Y ;IT Sys � At � • .., s /. !• reyr ,�• .Cry P.c.'... � ^• \:../ , vtffe . M4 1Jb '� g ii±___ --- .- 1! ; j- - - --Jj7 1¢nV ,..., t:1 r Jf' it r .. r 4♦ � � C ov fr/ \1� rk� _,^_ •' ;)it,'' � f O, r .4'''' •yyam�,� w ��.-- ;\lll V.�f eav s y;� .,1,r `Sr ., ./fY e. - � ',o ,cf-•r:".•,y. D ``� lyt Y N 1 ?_ Ir "...a.•'aZl ', 1ii,1: ....�aJ- 'er = V, r,,tkiso:n Q"=7� -1 ~,..,'.'aw ry.. .,.! `' :r�Y n i r1 I f3 .. ! - � 7 11 Q• M y1, I • 1 I II 1 - 1' .1 _ ii :- , I_t_ �n xr�..1`! 1 �y.ti� e� � a "f ,��i �s�a 1 � � � �+ ��r� i.. I y ' ,', '..,` '?*,..U.,:'j11''''!iO4. S..":'tl'.'..'', '3,,,1'.'4',''.''' ';r--,' ;g; ' i . ; .-- ,- : . ' , ' . ;I - ;i j • 1k *+ai 7 - 3 "t °� '� n F I°ice..' fi 1, �t'��R NI,•_ '` �_�, ; � , Ii ,'< `,,, 11 a. t��!�";.1.,f,1g7' ,`u ' — --- -_ ,I�� '�i�Vll'I, 1..1i,/ �I V�'1'1 1 r „xt r�r$.�m.o ,,..:. - .,,,,,I, , .. ---, , , , ..„,..,,,,,:,,..,..,,,,,,,.......,_:,... ,., . ,,,,,„ ,, ,,. : - _ - - . ,,----- --,___=____,_,-:, . ,,,_, .\,\, ., . r am _ !<.'RS'INIl','1_ I ®xr�^..s'.i'vx 1 I 1 I ,, ;k� '} ^ 1 Fl. � 4K Y '� T''94. i eX I! I I , , V JY11' tr,T_. ._ -', i *ak a i j .wr J f f� .yi. ` y r�l a -1�wV' mil. -:.:'-.: i R P�Y 7r� ,if' ^bR•1 . \/ `` Yl , ! r 7 ti I' 4 Y t/ f ,4 i ; i wok* [ I .1I ,-..,-.-,.-.,..+......,•-...-,-.....,,,,'S' ' ':(r)'14.'Tit'',, ri...1 ' 07-7-','-77-7,-" ,44;,, c,s,,?,,,,,,,,q,-,13.,":11, ,:-,-.7-•;.,.,et, ., .., ' - tf,1-.: ...,, c• ). VTirr5wITE t, tf t f( -.4 hyrc'-' -------- -----'----- r .,,,....;4• ,....;&,,,,.,..,,,•.‘,4„..4.4 elk v.!;.5..?:•• , Nir • : ',..i.,3 ')•'7 ., >,.. ., .. si„ •, ,. v,•,..,., -.f 5,,.1-,•-.,5,5 .. 0•„ji.,. c", -, k,14)4fr4)A,'„? '.r,'r*?)241, 1,"))';1,r,,,M"")::'• ':,•1\,,,,e;sZ17,1',. -i.!4v e :..k).$• `r.'4" r?•10, ':P's.1../',.'•vi.. ',,Id...",,'0,4)..4it`lt"1,ty,;, ;'), ' -kii‘',,g-‘2(:{f.',7:: :: ,til..h).. t.,,,t'•.,,''1:6}A'.i,‘''IAi.t:&•eZ'.14.g.f-ci.t-';:.'.'', i...;...-, i 1 /,,,- -":>'-''•%'51;;;;; ::' - VI,;•,:/1 'A';;;4',,.,'''gif.O.'''-`:, •-;:-;, :,', ‘,' 0„..wri......._ '....1,.F.„:1•...,- '""''''''''''-'''''`'" '1 ve••• -' i'kyiltS4,•'inX ‘WTIel ,,,l,p,II.:4 '''' • j,..," '''/...4." .- - ,•-. -... ...4‘,.t. , .... ,,. ..: 4 A .')2.,41/r, .......' r""."....I."'"...'1".7..-^ ...'-^ri".2 thh ."-"' k,1.1 kl,.'.• . s? .N.;:..;4 4;t:{.k;44P:'.'.e'41 4 ,f'. '.•',i• ' ' P , , ' .:' `1,-4,1%p t1.1.4.' ,.it,"5„ty:;1,,C" ,".-,, •'',. '. 1 '"" r 0110044011011010 f Hurricane Shutters CUSTOMER: GREG PAIGE Mean Roof Height: 15'-0" Address: 246 DIXIE BLVD. Width: 45'-0" Complex/Condo: Depth: 70'-0" City: DELRAY BEACH State: FLORIDA, ZIP: 33444 Type of Shutter: - BERTHA HV Accordion Shutter System: Openings# lthru 14 -0.050"Aluminum Storm Panels: Openings# 15 and 16 -Openings not included: X 45'-o' WINDOW SCHEDULE Window Dimentions(In.) Window 53"x39" number Width Height type Material ® 1 74 51 Double awning Aluminum 2 74 51 Double awning Aluminum 3 53 38 Awning Aluminum (EGRESS) 4 37 26 Awning Alumi. so 72"x81" 5 74 38 Double awning Alumi IIIII 10 ®I r 53"x39" 6 53 38 Awning Alumi= 7 57 26 Awning Aluminum 106"x38" 11 8 53 39 Awning Aluminum - GABLE 9 53 39 Awning Aluminum ry-- VENTS 10 72 81 Sliding glass door Aluminum l Xf 11 106 38 Double awning Aluminum Entry Door 10 — ..1 037"x26" 12 37 38 Awning Aluminum 24"x16" 24 x16 [ 13 37 38 Awning Aluminum 14 107 38 Double awning Aluminum 37"x38" 12 15 24 16 Gable vent Aluminum ©[ 53"x38" 16 24 16 Gable vent Aluminum 70'-0' Entry Door OX 1J 05 l I 74"x38" 37"x38" 13 Entry Door OX ®[ 37"x26" 107"x38" 14 ®[ 53"x38" 0 ED 74"x51" Entry Door 74"x51" (EGRESS) CITY OF DELRAY BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD ORDER In Re: 2Y(o Z' / &UU-- v/Z7 / ! (applicant's name and address) ORDER ollowing consideration of all the evidence and testimony presented at the (date) meeting before the Historic Preservation Board for the City of Delray Bea h an pursuant to Section(s) 2.4.6(H), 4.5.1, and/or 4.5.1(J) of the Land Development Regulations and the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Delray Beach, the Historic Preservation Board finds that there is amp e and competent substan al evidence to support its findings that the application for /q (Z008- Jam) on the property referenced above is hereby granted denied by a vote of V - U . Pursuant to LDR Sections 2.4.7(E)(1) and 2.4.7(E)(3)(a), a decision of the Historic Preservation Board may be appealed to the City Commission so long as a letter of appeal is received by the City Clerk within ten (10) working days of the action being appealed. y34sed on the entire r cord before it, the Historic Preservation Board adopts this Order thisday of , 2005 . Chair Historic Preservation Board copies to: (applicant) DELRAY BEACH F L R D All-America City 111lir® 1993 2001 SIGN IN SHEET 2001 Regular Historic Preservation Board Meeting September 4, 2008 PRINT FULL NAME ADDRESS OR ITEM NO. ORGANIZATION Deo 5 Epoat 5.6 G-cry 2.(( ii), (C _e() ( 1 A HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD September 4, 2008 MEETING COMMENCED: 6:00 f p.m. NAME ATTEND MINUTES 246 Dixie Blvd 154-170 NW 5th Ave 3/15/06 1/3/07 2/07/07 52/07 7/11/07 8/01/07 8/15/07 / VOTE ROGER COPE % o ,„4 /7) 122 KEITH SNIDER RHONDA SEXTON - % 1/4/7 0 DAN SLOAN . 22'7)3 c2 MAL TONI DEL FIANDRA JOANN PEART •4 TOM STANLEY MEETING ADJOURNED: P.M. HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD September 4, 2008 MEETING COMMENCED: 6:10 p.m. NAME ATTEND MINUTES 246 Dixie Blvd 154-170 NW 5th Ave 3/15/06 1/3/07 2/07/07 52/07 7/11/07 8/01/07 8/15/07 VOTE 4 TO 0 3 TO 1 ROGER COPE SECONDED MADE MOTION KEITH SNIDER ABSENT RHONDA SEXTON MADE MOTION SECONDED NO DAN SLOAN MADE MOTION SECONDED TONI DEL FIANDRA JOANN PEART ABSENT TOM STANLEY ABSENT MEETING ADJOURNED: 7:45 P.M. yO � -3-40 Nl s 6 , 91 f / rioLe ""*. a I-t, `) I �L 0)A-(71---t.-"Y1 c)n Q GL a-I aY r 1 • /f ev1/ 6e7 r-E-/ Lo (00 o-Th re2 -f/ 0 e) 3z )7A, Nc-,0 c. (07,712 0 _ • 9 -4- 'A_ ? `N �- �- ) oe ,--) . ) 10:0s0„-N ) r F ,/_eJ? 17(Th s2;--i? • 00,,,9 c 1, `( /( Cy' 6?) C___P (*t- ke2 7) x 4- /411it_ e_ cdozyfi Grp _ IZ 42-k ot 0)J z ) d-ez -. CD,1 a.,,d • a-- 9 (e/ ou1 - y(-Q 47 ?t--( 4)- - (,) : c__--;-- Q-0_,-- .,-2 ----c="Jz/ ) . N , _..) ___--- /°--- ------( . -- 3) (-- 2-t-) /✓`c___J ? 9 f E___ - -I) G V ® / 1 .i-± . f 2-L ,a,c-o , LAr.,,,v... ,_____. — ,-2___&y6, (..."1.5.„)._,__________ r-- Ir---8 9____L_ __ W0 � � � E • (E) o-) 1 9/s.7 92) ).2 a.C7 1229 LZ—ec. 6 - / 7O 2-1_ , c) A ga_Ltoici-tN.c. pvc , a tx) L&ot-- (-q / 4,/ iz tt7 76, (7 y N 7 1 /2/. $ , n � ! A / 6-7 ( Cam "' `,?( v i� -91 6d ti £ � „1-L y atieA \ / e e — 2/ — ) CD0 )ii) jc ) , 7 A6( r - y /2/ 0 01----,_. C)--Th K>2e ),,.) /' :7 7- __, _e_e, , } ' 9)A-__ �j 2 I i0 4--" 0.2____( '1 c ^---) .71 02 /1 ' - ---Ce "---- C (Zn-1/ •PL-- 1 A2 ) P C- k )1 -24 0 U (�' / , n --tL '-) n PJ ) ,A , km a /61 C.9A -J2A- 1 opt r t7/0-L-4A o 4 /c7 A A-vt-00k- 1/1/ 722.4,c..4 s y vv—u—tk te_ita dcc. 3v4-4, 4z c pf) / °.2/ , ----y / - ----Lot-- / --e- ' '"-- -,3,....ELYZ G — 6 1 \ '''''. --------------- - ¶ A C)- -.A , oP .C-JeuiLd.‘ ea 63)c_.----) I /1 ---1 _ iLc A rc./:,- t, ), , .77 _ . / ,.-.,r-_7 ' I 1 - / zzz-L.„..4 ` Citek 2,j574-- ,2 (3, / 72Z A k---i :Z>L 4/ __ 6"1 /J*I/L � G s , 14 // Agilif Lc , , 7 „,„, , , ,i1 Irrl /-f, i' ignAli 1 _, i , 0.,„ - , . ..._.._ _ _1, ------ ----t--- rlir/VOree: — / 149i- ri ,,, ,___y V ,,,, a....6..„, ill c 5 / / i jor„„„.... ...,-------......---- j), 3, I ---11-L „ --yx-i2- ,4 c/d-- a'72//)- , g- 6- D ..2___________ 7) 'iv o- 71 0 s' ,v/ (,.), 0 ill / / ( v /I , , ,,---,..„3„ ,,g,)Cat-- , e„,,, i - / 4,2_ / „2.. ., ,__ / ------- 7__p____,` --'Q '' , • 7". rl 1/) o\ --� c / kg a a_ (derS