Loading...
HPB 02-07-18 -7/#4/3 r ado icsof cy.9-/ 4cia_ ;14. - EtzfiS Afda EVAllica J417-- SikE - „Rai-A.4 f- /-1/6 5 dc -- c-Td-d 44-is 4147 �e..j;419cLub_ liO v iP — / A-d« 99 kiac. dm-tut-4- - /20A , ire •-,mac 7- 0 4S 703 Ale- V4 - ed# jeL.ki P4CQr — (ic-hyDiatil CLW-lt - 404 - /<17`i — /4,,c)--(; r 43 - �n� — f',wd Jam-/ 9 /(Y1. A j,33 6 'I Yo,y 0L4c_c( 1/4_)4 /0 — oV--6 7 trite) A it TE IC/ p- 17Liz,tr;7 Gt./61/C — 1 U9 EX_ r v/ Lc_ kL t/fo2JE-d d_ /9,6%) ,4S- ,35 i--d 7,u ?I) - au-tio y 77 NiAe-le._ 1110 It telt) �C o�/7 - F-a-6 )4)-x_ ala_lcutc ___, And/c - Cc.s biz_ 4____cod_ 7ct, - oycr)d. 0)4-4.- PP / so 7-� 140/01A.L4ili . OA, AGENDA o = HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD r etP Meeting Date: February 7, 2018 Time: 6:00 P.M. Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: City Commission Chambers, City Hall, 100 NW 1st Avenue CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA IV. SWEARING IN OF THE PUBLIC V. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC (NOTE: Comments on items that are NOT on the Agenda will be taken immediately prior to Public Hearing Items.) Speakers will be limited to 3 minutes. VI. ACTION ITEMS A. In Lieu of Parking (2017-293): Consideration of a recommendation to the City Commission for an In Lieu of Parking request for 2 parking spaces in association with a Class III Site Plan Modification for the addition of a new 160 square foot walk-in cooler to a non-contributing structure. Address: 32 E. Atlantic Avenue, Old School Square Historic District Owner: Bright Horizons Inv Corporation & Goco, Inc. Applicant: Todd Herbst, Big Time Restaurant Group; todd@bigtimerestaurants.com Agent: Jose Torres, Slattery &Associates;joset@slatteryarchitects.com B. Certificate of Appropriateness (2017-266): Consideration of Class I Site Plan Modification associated with the painting of a mural on a site wall associated with an existing contributing structure. Address: 103 NE 4th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District Applicant/Property Owner: Neal Jones, Campbell Creative; nlj@360-degs.com C. Certificate of Appropriateness(2017-267): Consideration of Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of a new two-story, two-car garage, building addition, pool and site improvements to an existing structure that is individually listed on the Local Register of Historic Places. Address: 170 Marine Way, Individually Listed to the Local Register of Historic Places and Marina Historic District Applicant/Property Owner: William & Barbara Duffey; wduffey@regalpress.com Agent: Jeffrey Marteski, AIA, Randall Stofft Architects;jeffrey@stofft.com D. Certificate of Appropriateness (2017-246 & 247): Consideration of Certificate of Appropriateness for the exterior addition and renovations to an existing contributing structure and Variance request to reduce the side setback from 10' to 8.5'. Address: 19 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District Applicant/Property Owner: Olga Adler; olga@olgaadlerinteriors.com Agent: Roger Cope, AIA, Cope Architecture, Inc.; copearchitects@gmail.com Historic Preservation Board Meeting Agenda: February 7,2018 Page 2 of 2 VII. REPORTS AND COMMENTS ❖ Staff ❖ Board Members VIII. ADJOURN �, I lI Michelle Hoyland Principal Planner; HPB Board Liaison Posted on: January 30, 2018 The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service,program,or activity conducted by the City.Please contact the City Manager at 243-7010 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers.If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing,such persons will need a record of these proceedings,and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made.Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.The City does not provide or prepare such record.Two or more City Commissioners may be in attendance. s ' MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH MEETING DATE: February 7,2018 MEETING PLACE: Commission Chambers, City Hall I. CALL The meeting was called to order by HPB Chair John Miller at 6:00 P.M. II. ROLL A quorum was present. Members present were John Miller, Chairman, Price Patton, Angela Budano, Bill Bathurst, John Klein, Andrea Sherman and Andrea Harden. Absent: None. Staff present were Lynn Gelin Assistant City Attorney,Michelle Hoyland, Principal Planner, and Diane Miller,Board Secretary. III.APPROVAL OF AGENDA Motion to APPROVE the Agenda was made by Andrea Harden and seconded by Bill Bathurst. ALL IN FAVOR IV. SWEARING IN OF THE PUBLIC John Miller read the Quasi-Judicial Rules for the City of Delray Beach and Ms. Miller swore in all who wished to give testimony. V. MINUTES None VI. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Brenda Edwards-Carver High School Paula-Carver High School VII. ACTION ITEMS A. 32 East Atlantic Ave (2018-293) In Lieu Parking Michelle Hoyland,Principal Planner entered the project into the record. Exparte None Applicant Jose E. Torres-Slattery Sc Associates Todd Herbst-Big Time Restaurant Staff Presentation Michelle Hoyland presented the project from a power point presentation. 1 of 4 Minutes of the February 7,2018 Historic Preservation Board Public Comment None Board Comments None Motion to APPROVE the request to purchase 2 In Lieu parking spaces was made by John Klein and seconded by Andrea Sherman MOTION CARRIED 7-0. B. 103 NE 4th Street(2017-266) COA-Mural Jennifer Buce,Assistant Planner entered the project into the record. Exparte None Applicant Presentation Neal Jones, Campbell Creative Staff Presentation Jennifer Buce presented the project from a power point presentation. Public Comments None Motion to APPROVE the COA-Mural was made by Angela Budano and seconded byBill Bathurst MOTION CARRIED 6-1 Dissenting was Andrea Harden. C. 170 Marine Way(2017-267) COA Michelle Hoyland,Principal Planner entered the project into the record. Exparte None Applicant Presentation Jeff Marereski-Randal Stofft Architects Staff Presentation Michelle Hoyland presented the project from a power point presentation. Public Comments Roger Cope-Cope Architects Board Comments All in favor of the project 2 of 4 Minutes of the February 7,2018 Historic Preservation Board Motion to APPROVE the COA was made by Bill Bathurst and seconded by Angela Budano. Dissenting Price Patton MOTION CARRIED 6-1 D. 19 Dixie Boulevard-Del-Ida Park Historic District(2017-247) COA Michelle Hoyland,Principal Planner entered the project into the record. Exparte None Applicant Presentation Roger Cope-Cope Architecture Inc. Olga Adler-Owner Staff Presentation Michelle Hoyland presented the project from a power point presentation. Public Comments None Board Comments All in favor of the project Motion to APPROVE the COA was made by Price Patton and seconded by Bill Bathurst MOTION CARRIED 7-0 Motion to APPROVE the VARIANCF. was made by Price Patton and seconded by John Klein MOTION CARRIED 7-0 IX. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A.Staff Comments None B.Board Comments None 3 of 4 l • Minutes of the February 7,2018 Historic Preservation Board X. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Board,the meeting was adjourned at 8:00 PM The undersigned is the Secretary of the Historic Preservation Board and the information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for February 7,2018,which were formallyadopted and approved by the Board on June 6,2018.. fDia.ne .�VtiPPen Diane Miller If the Minutes you have received are not completed as indicated above,then this means that these are not the official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. (These Minutes are a word of the proceedings of this Board The full audio and zideo retarding of these proacdings are azailable at www.mydelraybeach.com/city-commission/av or a digital copy may be purchased at City HalL) 4 of 4 DELRAY BEACH bard All-America City I 1993 2001 SIGN IN SHEET 2001 Historic Preservation Board February 7, 2018 PRINT ADDRESS OR ITEM NO. ORGANIZATION FULL NAME Mcar-t i- cs A . ►u PAXL A N,&[J A'77./(7-• LON Yie f;. Ivt rt /6 C�/Z✓ K /I /7, /Ivo c, CA/j/ri atiletp s ///3/ /IC New , t_t 1 1\4014( iVI '`\Jd(( ✓?06` 4J4 I/%f<;vifir reef& L N0,0 601Adier& 1 Historic Preservati hoard-Voting Sheet III VI.A VLB VI.0 VLD VLD HPB MEETING HELD: ATTEND Approval of 32 E. Atlantic 103 NE 4' St 170 Marine 19 Dixie Blvd 19 Dixie Blvd February 7, 2018 Agenda In Lieu COA Way COA Variance COA Attorney: VOTE to Vote to VOTE to VOTE to VOTE to VOTE to Lynn Gelin Approve Approve Approve Approve Approve Approve AIF 7-0 6-1 7-0 7-0 7-0 Bill Bathurst P Y Y Y Y Y Y Andrea Sherman P Y Y Y Y Y Y Angela Budano P Y Y Y Y Y Y John Klein P Y Y Y Y Y Y Andrea Harden P Y Y NO Y Y Y Price Patton P Y Y Y Y Y Y John Miller P Y Y Y Y Y Y Page 1 ***with additional conditions added by the Board ADJOURNED: 8:00PM Historic Preservati 3oard-Voting Sheet T III VI.A VI.B VLC VLD HPB MEETING HELD: ATTEND Approval of 32 E. Atlantic 103 NE 4' St 170 Marine 19 Dixie Blvd February 7, 2018 Agenda In Lieu COA Way COA COA V v , , 'L Attorney: VOTE to Vote to VOTE to VOTE to VOTE to Lynn Gelin Approve Approve Approve Approve Approve ', 7 '1) 6 - 1 'i-0 --1,0 l'i) Bill Bathurst / / f / ✓ ..7 / ./Andrea Sherman Af tz Angela Budano ✓ / v ✓ ✓ , tZ John Klein ✓ / / , / Andrea Harden A / / / ✓✓ Price Patton /ift i 7 / ,/ ,, / / John Miller I / ✓ / ✓ 7 Page 1 ***with additional conditions added by the Board ADJOURNED: 0. °'� Planning and Zoning Division 0 t('.4r ��P Historic Preservation Board Memo Osteria Bossi — 32 E. Atlantic Avenue 1 The subject request is for the approval of 2 in lieu of parking spaces associated with a Class III ', Application Type: • Site Plan Modification for the installation of a 160 square foot, outdoor, walk-in cooler for a 1 Class III Site Plan Modification and In 1 restaurant located at 32 E. Atlantic Avenue, to be known as Osteria Bossi. The property, located I Lieu of Parking on the south side of E. Atlantic Avenue is zoned Old School Square Historic Arts District I Address/Location: (OSSHAD) and is within the Central Business District (CBD) zoning overlay; therefore, the CBD I 32 East Atlantic Avenue zoning regulations are applicable to the subject property, with the exception of conditional uses. • Further, the property is within the Old School Square Historic District and is considered a non- i Zoning District/Overlay: contributing resource in the district. I Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD), with Central Business The new 160 square foot, outdoor, walk-in cooler requires 2 additional parking spaces as the ; District(CBD) overlay current parking requirement is 15 spaces per each additional 1,000 square feet and the fractional calculation results in 2 parking spaces. The applicant is requesting to utilize the in-lieu of parking Old School Square Historic District for these spaces. (OSSHD) I The subject property is located within In Lieu Area 1, revised with Ordinance No. 15-17, which Applicant: requires S23,660 per space. The total in lieu fee for the 2 spaces is $47,320. 1 Todd Herbst, Big Time Restaurant Group Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(E)(3), new development, use conversion to existing ' Agent: • buildings, building additions and/or renovations, that result in the requirement to provide ' Jose E. Torres, Slattery&Associates new parking or additional parking, have the option of requesting some of the parking 1 Project Planner: spaces to be approved by the City Commission through the payment in-lieu of parking Michelle Hoyland, Principal Planner, program.A maximum limit of 30 percent of eligible required parking can be provided under 561-243-7040 this option, except for use conversions for which there is no maximum. Before granting 1 hoylandm@mydelraybeach.com the request, the City Commission must find that adequate public parking options are available and that the request is consistent with the Land Development Regulations, City I Advisory Board Review Date(s): Comprehensive Plan, and all currently adopted City policies and/or studies. PMAB: January 30, 2018 • • HPB: February 7, 2018 The intent of the in lieu program is to assist with new development, redevelopment, and adaptive I CRA: February 8, 2018 reuse of buildings throughout the downtown. Installation of a new 160 square foot walk-in cooler 1 DDA: February 12, 2018 • to the rear/south side of the building is to allow for complete use of the existing kitchen and is not • considered additional use area nor is it considered a building addition. Rather, it is an outdoor Final Action Review Date: refrigerator, accessed only from the exterior of the structure. It is not occupiable nor could it be ' City Commission: February 20, 2018 converted to habitable use area in the case of future expansions. The applicant submitted an in lieu of parking request for the 2 required spaces. Attachments: Site Plan There are three parking facilities within proximity of the proposed project: NOTE: This item is under review and is i e The Federspiel Garage on SE 1st Avenue, a public parking garage, which is located to the 1 subject to changes upon further south of the subject property. The 202-space parking garage consists of 107 public parking 1 analysis based on comments made by spaces; the other 95 spaces are reserved for the Worthing Place development located on the I Staff according to the City's Land east side of SE 1st Avenue,40 of those spaces were required to be available to the public 6:01 I Development Regulations (LDR) and p.m. through 7:59 a.m., Monday through Friday, and 12:01 p.m., Saturdays through 7:59 a.m. : other department technical reviews. on Mondays. ` Any comments or objections shall be I • The Old School Square Parking Garage is located one block to the north and contains 525 I presented to the approving body during parking spaces available to the public at all times. 1 the scheduled meeting or discussed The Monterey Lot is located on NW 1st Avenue behind the CRA building at 20 North Swinton 1 with the project planner in advance. Avenue and contains 85 parking spaces. Memo Date: January 23, 2018 r • In 2016, the City hired Kimley-Hom to perform a public parking study throughout the downtown which illustrated that the existing parking facilities within the downtown were at or close to capacity on a Saturday evening from 8pm-9pm during both peak and off-peak season. The study also • reviewed on-street parking along East Atlantic Avenue which showed the same results regarding capacity. The study did not include on-street parking along any side streets. The study indicates that the highest utilization times for the Old School Square Garage is on Friday and Saturday evenings (8pm — 9pm) during peak and off-peak seasons with just 58 spaces available on a Friday and 19 spaces available on a Saturday during peak season. The Federspiel Garage was noted as having 17 spaces available on a Friday and 2 spaces available on a Saturday both during peak season. The Monterey Lot had 3 spaces available on a Friday and no spaces available both during peak season. In consideration of the available parking within these three facilities, there are 78 parking spaces available on a Friday night and 17 available on a Saturday night during peak season. Given the information regarding the parking capacity during peak times, there are parking options within proximity to the property; therefore,the full request of 2 in-lieu parking spaces meets the required finding and the request is supportable given the accessory nature of the outdoor walk-in cooler. Location Map +�►—T • E Atl:wale-Ave "�♦ �' • . t. _). ,i # I �' Jai a • • ;t t -'s.�1ll!lilG �r 5"�¢ ' T•jtt�.r ��• 4r A € K l ^ isf , f i ,"uv,.' • ,.d 7 abi.i ii,.• ".g dI.i *'.., C i yam. =y6•r ..A - :il I ..r'---.i.ist.A kiA4LA'0-1.I • • • ' !L I. • y;` ,r .J.• It1 t • • • ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: A. Recommend to the City Commission approval of the request to purchase 2 In Lieu of Parking spaces, as the request meets the criteria outlined in LDR Section 4.6.9(E). . B. Recommend to the City Commission denial of the request to purchase 2 In Lieu of Parking spaces, as the request does not meet the criteria outlined in LDR Section 4.6.9(E). RECOMMENDATION: Recommend to the City Commission approval of the request to purchase 2 In Lieu of Parking spaces, as the request meets the criteria outlined in LDR Section 4.6.9(E). • • • i , • EXISTING LATER MIER I I - REVISIONS BY 70!>E RE-L�.1TED II 7 - .•g mu i' __� I I ... D(PP6TER,CAN RAW I I TO 3 : -18' ID N II I 11 I I SCOPE OF WORK IQQ� IA' „;,„,-_ I L REMOVAL OF EXISTING WATER HEATERS,WATER TANKS,CAN WASH p ¢W OUMPSTER AND GREASE RECOVERY SYSTEM. IINSTALLATION OF NEW CAN WASH,NEW GREASE RECOVERY SYSTEM, .� O NEWDUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AND WALK INCOOLEK Slattery `` !Ili � X LEGAL DESCRIPTION ����' �� --j... 'II W V .�� Y • LOT 3,TOGETHER WITH THE WEST 23.33 FEET OF 1013,AND THE EAST Ir. �: ' 2033'OF LOT 4,'SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 69,DELRAY,FLORIDA', .I I ACCORDING TO THE PUT THEREOF,RECORDED IN FIAT BOOK 2, ��.. -,�•� 1 PAGE 43,PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY,FLORIDA. �r r:, 7111 I.i A I•r i�.II• 1-•-r, IN' -AW - SCOPE OF WORK AREA SCJLLE:1-=10' --' As addles PLANNERS AREA CALCULATION 2060 NW BOCA BATON BLVD �3I01S SUITE 2 DF81L2Ni CA'I�- ( ,mil A - LNG . EXISTING RESTAURANT VESTED: ]6]2 S.F. _nu,rtG .N C.QIiR,SCT FEW CAN uJ.9H AREA IIFIJ •_ EXISTING BALCONY DI-LIEU: 2t15.F. j]OCA RATON.FL 33431 O l • Q ti 0I FEUf�d F .7�- • L NEW WALK[N COOLER PROPOSED: 60 S.F. 11 , Ache.o eonTaw tuo-.Teen dude RECAAZT 5Tb1Ett TEL:561-392-7&18 a ' — ../ �,/ �1 ay-:��,►�.'r,,r;�i/, , A ;� �'� �_":>,I •�T / PARKING CALCULATION FAX:561.392-5402 I ,' ✓?/�I� / tiii.-r / 41 //If E �// / IIa 101I_�I I I / '.- /%flrl' t • /•-I/�I1� A� N:::: J r /_=---- '.�/I�t'/•ram -///% II ��� __ Ii6m5FJ4 ',,. REGUIREo ExanMc PROPosE° acr"fv_sUTRTLVA¢t7)ttEt'I5.(.roU �� I///�1 ��i /' I � ��, /' 1637114:57:4.- //� a ]wITH 1 nME ' // '— •I / �� r � VA /'0'J%. IIEXLSnMc RESTAURANT REDurnoN of 1 6 1• /, __✓ //1/" �//# vEsrEoSPACE / .,a�� �i //', E7' I I it EXISTING BALCONY IN-LIEU 1 ��J/ _ -- ,,Yi' , j /•. ,1�. -a1: .•• DRA9J.Ct a IN-LIEU 1 ° EXISTING _1 � /I //// ��_ ___ /41-e%.J.l(. 111p / r :7 _r,r i�dl, — •'E' .I� 7 r 1 j 1•/� _ � . . /II_.�.1 r r 1 /; . UfEL brDP a r�'/ , /�/IFS/ /(/�r=. ,1� /�,l' I('U NEW PROPOSED 2upw D IN-LIEU ,,,/�//,,,,�.1�/I, /.✓�•ilr///rikl��,�/r 11.L4�II.l�r�' � f. .I O to, WALK IN COOLER ucwn 4.taa(c)(al(o) �1� / //'ill' I �����11/�/rlpi /Ic.i�u. I j �TLCI CA; I E 19 '} /�1 // / el,J II•I// J�I r.1,11"=_J I 7L10 G1R -1 / • /n 1�I I I �"/11tp d /I//I r.,: -J 1 PNX1l LOT 2 >- 5 'IN-LIEU FEES AS PER SECTION 4.6.9(E)(3)(N)DISTRICT MAP AREA L EXISTNG TREE / yp/"//��/II/i%I /{ I j/,I # i111�� ��11�/ -.8. �. •, I �°#a E \� '1 IAa;�'i`%% //Jh/�'lIL/�. ,11�1/��-�/1 'i�/4.�j /•► ,•,��11 W OFF STREET PARKING REGULATIONS sEC46.9 ...,...-EXISTING t.RY'.Q7ID E. -I � I ',,ed #oV ►i 9 7 �1� IMEEL STOP = I W E p, , r-ir-T'r .._i'.•- ,,,I•/ II 1 I /I.//,#1 . a \ - (E)LOGnON OF PARIGNG SPACES E _./ //%/ ///'`1 - .,� !'I//'/ :1'7%�✓1'�-1 641� ,I I, � Dc15T P171ER IRA' = a Z 0 V r / ����� II���v� / // + Jr�; J_ .�1`i�_ (3)(6)(1jIn-Uwlade Sub)eG to the Imitations at Nis SecWn,new Z • / [-_ f1/ • d.vwpPne+l4 saw aanvrsion fo.xic,n buddn buwm aabons endror rI A� ///y �* � //_ j i/ bt� ra��pJrenovations, Cityresult n the requirement to provide new pW krip or aGa enai ;Cr parting,have the option of requespng some or the writing spaces to be Y' —c __ , f'-'�" T I 1 pt>Pb approved by commlsdon through the payment a-wee or parking 1[ i / /�� III.. _ 1�•`li 1/' "%'I' /'��:% i FENCE comon ttss Required Nmum rking for use developmentsv ar.sianpl development or reption.l J (�� \ / I ! iik (�. 4- components are not eligible for the b-Wu option.A T / '' /I //„//i�////�ii/t%JI/� I � �� / m,:.num knit or 3o varc.nt or xgaM required wrk,n9 can ee pro.dtl under H= r- — • rw I %�/�1/�1�� ! the option,except for use conversions tor sun ch core Is ma:.mum.Before -I- � 4, -- -_,--In:•=%'g g 11 -1_%/ J��/1 /II'//AilOdi0.40A/I g grantng such approvals,Use Glen Commrsswn muss ma that•donuts public Q Q S1 4 a +• _ . - - � - parking optens are evadable and that the request is consistent win the Land _I 2 ) //( e - Development 14444A ens,Otr Comprehensive Plan,and au currently adopted W EI F y1f1` I ). -���� s I EXSSTNY I'O INIEE B City pahties and/or ssudes.[ArneOrd.40-1111/15/11]:[Amid.Ord.21-11 ~m Q Al I i I �. I bTORIC�FALLLtTIES ' .�. .- e/2/11].[Arno:.ad.02-08 2/19/061:[A^�d.Grid.]s-w 1/16ry 5]:[Artd.53-02 r^ Q RRI I O T!G •- . 1/7/03);[Md Ord.4-99 2/2/99];[Arrd.Ord.64-9311/23/93);[Amid Ord. �1 RI I I 1st-931/9/93] O cc LJJ I N)(d)PUBLIC PARKING FEE where adequate rgno-of-way exists.d pant to the Q J propased pre)ect ror which Ne fee has bun app oved,the Dp t Trust [-[.[1J.1 ° [ wq-e6 ct No ee ulnlu a Noprfitl g.N.City Cartmrsswtota [of space N ♦ ♦ R8 q - to created up to onthaff of a parwno space for each full pamamp n.The applicant ce nt will M 9 �a LJ TNG Ri?E PoLL conslreGed will n public right-of-war-(For example,the ps'o t requeets ro ♦ . LJ 1 O I I par the-AF a parting fee on four spaces;the applicant annstruFl four spaces In - Me right-ar-war;Me Kates nt must only par the puOIK parking fee for four spaces)Creedal()or spaces mnstruded in the right-of-war resulting w e EXIbT1G TREE Mp�Y-p�Rp - I Nelson shall be rounded down.[And.Ord.79-051/3/061 d5L71G NOTYN LGw'IFA:. EX)btlG LIGHTMEp (F)SPECIAL PROVISIONS V I I ws foretteennE.b too receive a Park and dealer the autumobirs ofacility with a valet service or ofocwr WERE wnts,a� YYA fl I I tenants,customers.LnrBus,and Motors,molding tandem parking may be EXIST-NG TREE 1 F I I utLved in lieu of the requirements or the section provided tM foliow,ng _, I rogue-smelts are aorngyd well:(M,d.ova.37-0l 7/10/01] J (e)MY required Malt ar tandem parking utilized In less of the parkin rr ar O F_F'"' I tiler ants tit forth N Mrs semen shag be governed by an agreement sadly tl' (�• GOB/= II i cttrwblorecords us such r Me end ornerCity�tMiaumaYMtoceaid `ttt r?' .01. 7' ^ " Y I covenant rig wan[ne Land binding sawn m.ovine,,,n.a,,aa,dnisv.tors. o I 1 '. 1" ) Successors,and asHglts The agreement may wr.lee•ed by N.OW ..� _r oe — CmmG arse at such time that site glom approval b obtained for an alternative — -- - FR7PER[Y LNE NOW I I parking arrangement which ut,Y the parking requirements for said use. Z. p. AR 91667 vi I I (Mid.Ord.37-01]/10/011Vsss I. s O SEC 4.4.24 OLD SOIOOL HISTORIC ARTS DISTRICT(055Hw) =.$RED AR‘a,frr (G)SUPPLEMENTAL DISTRICT REGULATIONS sIA77ERY AND ASSOCIATES (4)(6)PARKING REQUIREMENTS Restaurants shall provide sit spaces per 1,000 FLORIDA llE©STCATIOXa.i1WN111 square far:of total new or existing floor area being converted to restaurant eau, ucept For Lots 1 through 6n Bieck 69 where 12 space per 1,000 square feet of gross fear area up to 6,000 square feet and hen 15 spaces par 1,000 square feet of gross floor area over the Initial 6,000 square feet is required.[Mid.Ord. ORAwI 29-119/20/11];[Md.Ord.53-93 1/11/94) AB PROPOSED SITE PLAN // a;T Val F:1-=117 i -7- DATE ,\ 12-01-17 KALE AS NOTED JOB NO. 2017-40 SHEET A-101 0, f HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: February 7, 2018 ITEM: 103 NE 4th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District - Certificate of Appropriateness 2017-266 mural. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness GENERAL DATA: _-• .0 0, y� 1�" eke'- �.1 Owner/Applicant. Neal Jones = ^.� b �t �� .• , v.i.: ,, 41.-.111„1114.._ • Ve-, ,o-44. '',.4 X yam" 14-. ' Mj'' 10 • 4T f. Location- North side of NE 4th Street between Itif f .. Y� � '�'''T"` N. Swinton Avenue and NE 2nd .1 c`+;w' �r j ' a - p 0 4-- Avenue d Property Size- 0.28 Acres .' '.�`' i1 xEsm' t Historic District: Del-Ida Park Historic District t : "wit � ` '' •'"" Zoning' RO (Residential Office) .5m St • �c . "' JiL s i - .. g Adjacent Zoning' _t _ _ s z l North: R-1-AA(Single-Family Residential). ...... 1' R '' ; '1 OSSHAD (Old School Square lF a;!,St.`'•_ _ r -•rE 41 South: .c- . : ;� .1' -.,I Historic Arts District) ',e°- -," 1 - _p - :1 East: RO :ems;' West: RO i. .� ; -,fir-: . �c ; ' ril Existing Future Land . 4 4 ,� ::Ii, _ Use Designation' TRN (Transitional) tati c Water Service: Public water service is provided on- �1- "f,I r am' ' .. -'1 "1 1 r '' site - . t• 'i` - Sewer Service: Public sewer service is provided on- site I Ii ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is consideration of a Class I Site Plan Modification, Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) associated with the painting of a mural on a site wall associated with an existing contributing structure located at 103 NE litn Street, in the Del-Ida Park Historic District, pursuant to Land Development Regulations(LDR) Section 2.4.6(H). BACKGROUND &PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject property is located on the north side of NE 4th Street between N. Swinton Avenue and NE 2`d Avenue in the Residential Office (RO) zoning district and the Del-Ida Park Historic District. The Old School Square Historic District(OSSHD), the Old School Historic Arts District(OSSHAD)zoning district and the Pineapple Grove Arts District are across the street to the south while the Artist's Alley area exists approximately one block to the east. The existing 1,080 square foot structure was built in 1949, is considered a contributing resource to the historic district and is occupied by a business office. At its meeting of July 17, 1991, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) approved a site plan, landscape plan and associated Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) for the conversion of the existing single family residence to an optometrist office. On March 4, 2005, a COA application for the replacement of the roofing shingles and repainting the exterior of the building was approved administratively. On April 6th 2005, a COA was approved for the replacement and installation of new windows. The item before the board now is a COA for the approval of a mural. It should also be noted that the applicant recently submitted applications for an exterior color change and installation of a new sign both have been administratively approved. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSAL Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H)(5), prior to approval, a finding must be made that any Certificate of Appropriateness which is to be approved is consistent with Historic Preservation purposes pursuant to Objective A-4 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and specifically with provisions of Section 4.5.1, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. LDR SECTION 4.5.1, HISTORIC PRESERVATION, DESIGNATED DISTRICTS, SITES, AND BUILDINGS Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E), Development Standards, all new development or exterior improvements on individually designated historic properties and/or properties located within historic districts shall, comply with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and the Development Standards of this Section. No direct reference is made to murals affecting historic structures, sites, or districts; however, pursuant to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards, there is importance in preserving "character-defining" and distinctive features, and discussing scale and compatibility within historic districts such as the following: Standard 8 New construction and all improvements to both contributing and noncontributing buildings, structures and appurtenances thereto within a designated historic or on an individually designated property shall be visually compatible. The intent of this Standard has been met as the integrity of the historic building will not be compromised; therefore, positive findings are made. 103 NE 4th Street;COA 2017-266 HPB Meeting of February 7,2018 Page 2 of 3 Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(7) - Visual Compatibility Standards: new construction and all improvements to both contributing and noncontributing buildings, structures and appurtenances thereto within a designated historic district or on an individually designated property shall be visually compatible. In addition to the Zoning District Regulations, the Historic Preservation Board shall apply the visual compatibility standards provided for in this Section with regard to height, width, mass, scale, facade, openings, rhythm, material, color, texture, roof shape, direction, and other criteria set forth elsewhere in Section 4.5.1. Visual compatibility for minor and major development as referenced in Section 4.5.1(E)(2) shall be determined by utilizing criteria contained in (a)-(m). Visual compatibility for all development on individually designated properties outside the district shall be determined by comparison to other structures within the site. The mural is deemed compatible with the surrounding commercial area along NE 4th Street/Lake Ida Road, especially given its location on the northern border of the adjacent Pineapple Grove Arts District. Painting of the wall does not negatively affect visual compatibility of the contributing structure. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.7(F)(3)(e) Murals and signs within mural, A large painting or drawing affixed to the wall of a building located in commercially zoned districts shall be subject to approval by the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board or the Historic Preservation Board. The subject property is within the RO zoning district which is a commercially zoned district. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4..17 (H)(1), Special Regulations, All buildings and structures shall appear to be residential in character regardless of the actual use therein, shall be kept in sound and attractive condition, and in established neighborhoods shall be generally compatible in architectural style and scale with the surrounding area. The subject property is located across the street from the Old School Square Historic Arts District, the Old School Square Historic District as well as the Pineapple Grove Arts District. Additionally, the property is situated approximately one block west of Artist's Alley, an area which has a high concentration of art based uses and where multiple murals can be found; including Bedner's Farm Fresh Market, the Spengler Construction office and the Arts Warehouse, further to the south. The mural is painted on an existing concrete wall to the rear of the property in vibrant orange, blue, and magenta in symmetrical designs. There is a colorful pineapple painted on the eastern portion of the wall and what appears to be a coconut drink and reads "Make it Memorable". It is noted that the wording is not considered signage as it is not advertising the business. The mural was painted by a local artist named Ben Heller. It is noted that the uses along NE 4th Street/Lake Ida Road are primarily commercial in nature and NE 4th Street is classified as an arterial roadway with 3 lanes. The mural is compatible with the architectural style, scale and character of the surrounding commercial area and neighborhood. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS I A. Continue with direction. B. Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness (2017-266) for 103 NE 4th Street, Del-Ida Historic District, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations Section 2.4.6(H)(5). 103 NE 4th Street;COA 2017-266 HPB Meeting of February 7,2018 Page 3 of 3 C. Deny the Certificate of Appropriateness (2017-266)for 103 NE 4th Street, -Ida Historic District, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof does not meet the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations Section 2.4.6(H)(5). RECOMMENDATION Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness (2017-266)for 103 NE 4th Street, Del-Ida Historic District, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations Section 2.4.6(H)(5). Report Prepared By: Jennifer Buce, Assistant Planner Sheet 2 of 3(Sketch of Survey)-See Sheet 3 of 3 for Legal Description.Certifications.Property and other Survey related data.SURVEY IS NOT COMPLETE WITHOUT ALL SHEETS / (5 SCALE:I'=30 Er«4'tr6,.o4 co..•Cttit '-E 104Lsr..4.-. ILOT 17BLOCK I LOT 16 FOUND I/2' 6 BLOCK 6 0WROD _ FOUND 1/2' N UPo I OO.O�{�) IO1.27'1tv7) IRON ROD -4.-, CONCRETE W ' UP O.'N,1.3'E OFFSET 0.4'QUT �l LOT 10 .r �t �, �1 6 �r •. . UNETWE LEGEND IIII a0)\�� 45•34 - BOUNDARY L Nf 1, I B/�f BUILDING LINE cV c c m ASPHALT Nd `; LOT 13 -"--- CENTERLINE o PARKING ASPHALT BLOCK 6 4I' ORIVE EASEMENT UNE I —+—_ ChhNUNKFENCE 3.55'< N . 9.45' ^.22' — —..—..—..— W 00EN FENCE 8� ' i p a g 3 I I SLOTtri ONE STORY —'—'— OVlPtt AD CABLEBLCCK 6 - cn RESIDENCE i l03 N u i EI.CROACHr..'`N S sham iN RED TL G j m 9.G0 — S 1' Illrilin 9.91' 14.07 IE68 : 0 1 PHALT LOT 12 G DENOTES atak.ANGLE 4 12.60 g ■ PARKING ii ,. .. BL0CK6 GTVD9t0TESC4&ELV.60X d 53.26' — CNDEAnTES CARDDISTANCE DE D ENO TES DRAYAGE G E EASEMEJiT ASFTIALT FN DENOTES FOffiVD NAL LN@ I o" '° DRIVE bID910TESitEtSt 1.9 OUT-J ' FOUND NAIL AT QW�OTESOVE ADGBLE BLOCK CORNER P ARMS PUT FOUND 1/2' 2.0' '=:--o LE55 T, 'SOUTH 15' "�� PPDi3VOTESPOOLPIAItP IRON ROD �'� BY OFFICIAL RECORDS%•r 7254,'AGE 1254 :y�'h FOUND i/2' O' 127.00(P) RCt3rl71ESRADIUS 2.7 W OFFSET n k i�i THEREOF A5 COM .l TO PALM: • COUNf1 �9 IRON ROD 127.54(11) 0., W TR DENOTES TELERl01ERISER s.s'CONC.SIDEWALK 100.00(L) 102.15'(M) UEDENOTES UNITY EASEMENT �'m All- LPD&YOTESUIHl1YPLYE 8 ara .rr CONC. 14MD9fOlESWATB?! 7Et UP 8 I NE 4T11 STREET N 5?ASPHALT ROADWAY 50 MI-ET-OF-WAY BEARING REFERENCE:NONE.RECORD INFORMATION RELIANT UPON ANGULAR PLEASE NOTE: DATA ONLY.ALL ANGULAR DATA SHOWN HEREON REFERENCED THERETO. SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SERVICED BY PUBLIC Lama. . Notable Conditions•Please note @re following: None Mood. Landbec Srneyilg ailed sues tiw.shat to Sty dflaide.Reese refer b or al (mice hide':70932SE wieu.LanolecSahey.amfaupbdaleiformafceabatarbattleandcoveragearm Thus army has been issued by the faxing Le dlec&reek ate: Dam By:1 Satnyer - J -irway Drive-Ste. 101 Dale d Feld Work:12(20015 ill Cd Beach,FL.33441 \Signatures & Documents\NewLandtec Logo.tlf 01-.(561)367-3587 Fax:(561)465-3145 Ration: www.LandtecSurvey.com ReWsien: .. . . • . , • , fir: ' ik:' 1 ". ..,,, -1 7. , '• ' . • ft, "i •i''' -, • • ' 1111&,,, .„,.' • * . ..),•: '. ....,:,.''''1•%.3 •• , . . ... +' • , ---,... , „ .: t• • .1107,., .•-•• • Mkt' .VI% . ! ,•,,ik... . i •Z., • 64 ., • i I , . ' .1; 1 - . • $ • • - , • .• ••••Mb . ,...-. ':;4'-..k.:\.'kf... • 1**. . k t.:i 1 . .,e-N • "41# . . ,. .::'..-,. 41h4..!.17,,%-'•s' ..'f , -•;';', ,' : 1%101 r• . •. ,.. Ift :. , .', -..•:kflili'" PI, .. .. ...... -- 7'--- .. ' ' .1401?t ' til t.t: ,,,..,„„_.7 ., -. . , ...• -• . - ... • , . . ,• ,,,J, . .. . . 1.- - It',1 .4. ... ,„i:' - *7-' • -- ,;:. „ , ... „...` `• ,. ' •• - . 4 ' ....1,-.,4,.!*-4,i,,g, •' ••••••• •-• • . - AMP .. •4,- ... . ,- .. ' • ‘..•.' • . ...- .......'. ". ' ' ••'"....;.`,.(`'....7.''‘-`;f"'' ;,;::".-' '-''''. ' .. . • . •1 • . . • .. i* ''... . ••• ... ' , ' `ft , . . .;•; . - • i m6": . ' ' lkili :••\ —1 .A ?•''' . St •.° . ••,.. .... 4\,. s -.1 • :...i.oh.' •i ',$ _, , ingst" „ % A k .* Of.' • • . ••?. f ik;4.ill P. . . /5/t ..M. . ' . ..,41111111111 ,..** ., •••`hi • 1 - 11' 1 ' . '''' Ow v•,,14'..i' • , I „ K j A€4 .4 • -•tf, ..: * \ ) M IA r, '•'. 'it ' • r i,i•I . - ,„,,,,,- .... . . 4 .., ,... r '1''•:;. ' b.,. i•," $ •---— .. ' i ii? 1 ._. , -I'• - .‘ ..-. '4 • , ...e. • ,. ... • . ,„...V7'.;V•1,i L,0"'•'•1, • . . ',,gir...;*';.. , ';r1Si-.!'..• 4'• '• ',.;,..e.../';',44i•,,,C•414.- '41-4, '''.)14.,..i:::,,,:;',•: r„.ifhtoy.,....„,,,..-..,::,,isirx.'...,-.. -,,‘ i. - . „.. . . . •.--p- :. ..:- . ..-- CITY OF DELRAY BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD BOARD ORDER Project Name: 103 NE 4th Street Address: 103 NE 4th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District File Number: 2017-266 ORDER Following consideration of all the evidence and testimony presented at the February 7, 2018 meeting before the Historic Preservation Board for the City of Delray Beach and pursuant to the respective Section(s) of the Land Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach, the Historic Preservation Board finds that there is ample and competent substantial evidence to support the fmdings, as applicable, for the referenced projects. Approved with Request&LDR Section Approved Conditions* Denied** CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 2.4.6(H)(5) *Conditions of Approval are attached as Exhibit A. **For a denial, the list of findings not supported by the Board are attached as Exhibit B. Chair Historic Preservation Board Return Original to: Neal Jones 103 NE 4th Street Delray Beach, FL 33444 r HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: February 7, 2018 ITEM: 170 Marine Way, Marina Historic District - Certificate of Appropriateness (2017-267) for exterior addition to the principal structure and for construction of a two-car garage. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness GENERAL DATA: 24 Owner William Duffey `CA 0 SE 1.t St -- �► Agent Jeff Marteski, AIA; Randall Stofft k< °•* �rSlt - Architects - 4Y a -- = y 4 I Location. Northwest corner of Marine Way i =' _ and SE 2nd Street li- • +r' •-lr` i Property Size• 0.20 Acres xow t -j L` �,t ►,- `il Historic District: Marina Historic District ' i ,p"...o j i f Zoning• RM (Multiple Family-Medium 1 • P:, ii • Density) i • - 14 " . . g._ . I Adjacent Zoning. I ' �#+_ -* North: RM — • 1 �: *- �r f East: RM - Air '• ` f )`� South: RM West: RM a ,_. -- - -A. Existing Future Land N ', - .n..- r u `. f Use Designation. MD (Medium Density 5-12 DU/ 4� -*} . ;- v 1{ _4, Acre) kL fa - j •' Water Service. Public water service is provided • • ° on site. ji , '... ems. Sewer Service Public sewer service is provided 4* ' ► ,- 'SF 2nd,St y" on site. •�r � :4, _ = -�-'; - • NORTH r � y s ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is the consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness (2017-267) request associated with a 172 square foot exterior addition, construction of a 432 square foot, two- story, two-car garage, pool, landscaping and perimeter fence to the contributing structure located at 170 Marine Way, Marina Historic District, pursuant to Land Development Regulations (LDR) Section 2.4.6(H). BACKGROUND & PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject property is located within the RM (Multiple Family-Medium Density) zoning district. The original historic structure was built in 1939, was relocated to the subject property in 2012, is Individually Designated to the Local Register of Historic Places, and contributes to the historic building stock of the Marina Historic District. According to the City Property Cards, the historic structure is two-story, A-frame, vernacular style structure. At its meeting of August 15, 2012, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) approved COA and variance (2012-189) requests associated with the relocation of a single-family residence from 806 NE 2'd Street to 170 Marine Way. In order to accommodate the structure on the subject site, the relocation proposal included a variance to reduce the side street setback to 5' (whereas 15' was required)from the South property line (adjacent to SE 2"d Street). At its meeting of February 6, 2013, the HPB approved COA (2013-082) associated with additions and alteration to the single-family residence that included an open front porch addition (East elevation), installation of concrete landing and steps (North and West elevation), installation of concrete porch (South elevation), brick paver walkway from Marine Way, and replacement of upper story rail with decorative capped aluminum rail. The HPB also recommended the approval of COA (2013-044) to individually designate the subject structure to be known as "The Marina House". The designation was approved by the City Commission at its March 5, 2013 meeting. The subject COA request includes: 1. Construction of a 172 square foot addition to the North side of the existing single-family residence; 2. Construction of a new two-story, two-car garage with a 432 square foot, 2"d floor guest suite above; 3. Construction of a new pool and associated deck; and, 4. Construction of new aluminum rail perimeter fence, concrete columns and concrete privacy wall. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSAL Pursuant to Land Development Regulation (LDR) Section 2.4.6(H)(5), prior to approval, a finding must be made that any Certificate of Appropriateness which is to be approved is consistent with Historic Preservation purposes pursuant to Objective A-4 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and specifically with provisions of Section 4.5.1, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.6(F)(1), Development Standards - The provisions for the R-1-A District shall apply for single family detached dwellings. The subject property is a single-family dwelling within the RM (Multiple Family-Medium Density) zoning district; therefore, R-1-A zoning is applied. 170 Marine Way;COA 2017-267 T' Page 2 of 4 LDR SECTION 4.5.1, HISTORIC PRESERVATION, DESIGNATED DISTRICTS, SITES, AND BUILDINGS Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E) - Development Standards: all new development or exterior improvements on individually designated historic properties and/or properties located within historic districts shall, comply with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and the Development Standards of this Section. Standard 2 The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. Standard 9 New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. The proposal meets the applicable Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation standards and their intent as the proposed changes ensure an appropriate addition to the existing historic structure. Construction of the new 2-story garage is compatible with the massing, size, scale and architectural features of the property and its environment. The addition will expand the kitchen on first floor and will expand a bathroom and walk-in-closet on the second floor. The addition will also reconfigure the stoop and railing on East elevation (front façade). The roof on the addition will include a new dormer and concrete tile to match the existing roofing material of the single-family residence. A new pool, landscaping, and perimeter fence are also proposed. The new two-story, two-car garage will include a guest suite on the 2nd floor which will be accessed by an internal staircase. The height of the two-car garage will not exceed the height of the existing single-family residence, ensuring it will be subordinate to the massing of the principal structure. The proposed changes do not destroy historic features that characterize the structure. Overall, the proposed changes protect the historic integrity of the existing structure and its environment allowing for updates and expansion to the structure utilizing durable materials. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(2)(b)(2) - Major Development. The subject application is considered "Major Development" as it involves "alteration of a building in excess of 25 percent of the existing floor area, and all appurtenances." Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(7) - Visual Compatibility Standards: new construction and all improvements to both contributing and noncontributing buildings, structures and appurtenances thereto within a designated historic district or on an individually designated property shall be visually compatible. In addition to the Zoning District Regulations, the Historic Preservation Board shall apply the visual compatibility standards provided for in this Section with regard to height, width, mass, scale, façade, openings, rhythm, material, color, texture, roof shape, direction, and other criteria set forth elsewhere in Section 4.5.1. Visual compatibility for minor and major development as referenced in Section 4.5.1(E)(2) shall be determined by utilizing criteria contained in (a)-(m). Visual compatibility for all development on individually designated properties outside the district shall be determined by comparison to other structures within the site. Applicable Visual Compatibility Standards 170 Marine Way;COA 2017-267 Page 3 of 4 (a) Height: The height of proposed buildings or modifications shall be visually compatible in comparison or relation to the height of existing structures and buildings in a historic district for all major and minor development. For major development, visual compatibility with respect to the height of residential structures, as defined by 4.5.1(E)(2)(a), shall also be determined through application of the Building Height Plane. (b)Front Facade Proportion: The front facade of each building or structure shall be visually compatible with and be in direct relationship to the width of the building and to the height of the front elevation of other existing structures and buildings within the subject historic district. (c) Proportion of Openings (Windows and Doors): The openings of any building within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the openings exemplified by prevailing historic architectural styles of similar buildings within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors to the height of windows and doors among buildings shall be visually compatible within the subject historic district. (g) Relationship of Materials, Texture, and Color: The relationship of materials, texture, and color of the facade of a building and/or hardscaping shall be visually compatible with the predominant materials used in the historic buildings and structures within the subject historic district. (h) Roof Shapes: The roof shape, including type and slope, of a building or structure shall be visually compatible with the roof shape of existing historic buildings or structures within the subject historic district. The roof shape shall be consistent with the architectural style of the building. (j) Scale of a Building: The size of a building and the building mass in relation to open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, porches, and lot size shall be visually compatible with the building size and mass of historic buildings and structures within a historic district for all development. To determine whether the scale of a building is appropriate, the following shall apply for major development only: 1. For buildings wider than sixty percent (60%) of the lot width, a portion of the front façade must be setback a minimum of seven (7) additional feet from the front setback line. 2. For buildings deeper than fifty percent (50%) of the lot depth, a portion of each side façade, which is greater than one story high, must be setback a minimum of five (5) additional feet from the side setback line. (k) Directional Expression of Front Elevation: A building shall be visually compatible with the buildings, structures, and sites within a historic district for all development with regard to its directional character,whether vertical or horizontal. (I) Architectural Style: All major and minor development shall consist of only one (1) architectural style per structure or property and not introduce elements definitive of another style. (m) Additions to individually designated properties and contributing structures in all historic districts. Visual compatibility shall be accomplished as follows: 1. Additions shall be located to the rear or least public side of a building and be as inconspicuous as possible. 2. Additions or accessory structures shall not be located in front of the established front wall plane of a historic building. 3. Characteristic features of the original building shall not be destroyed or obscured. 4. Additions shall be designed and constructed so that the basic form and character of the historic building will remain intact if the addition is ever removed. 5. Additions shall not introduce a new architectural style, mimic too closely the style of the existing building nor replicate the original design, but shall be coherent in design with the existing building. o . . 170 Marine Way;COA 2017-267 Page 4 of 4 6. Additions shall be secondary and subordinate to the main mass of the historic building and shall not overwhelm the original building. The proposed renovation and addition to the single-family residence is appropriate and compatible with the Marina Historic District. The height of the addition and the new two-story, two-car garage does not exceed the height of the existing single-family residence. The addition on the East elevation does not alter the front façade proportion. The majority of the windows and the door used in the proposed addition will be repurposed from the demolished portions of the existing single- family residence. The new windows and doors in the addition and new garage structure are similar to the proportion of existing openings on the principal structure. The proposed addition and new garage structure propose to utilize materials, texture, and color that are visually compatible to the existing single-family residence and do not introduce elements from another architectural style. The roof shape of the addition follows the same roof slope as the existing home. New dormers will be added which follow the same architectural style and have the same roof slope as the existing dormers. The two-story, two-car garage will include a roof slope and dormers that are visually compatible to the existing single-family residence. The size and massing of the home along with the addition and new two-car garage are visually compatible to the size and massing of surrounding properties. The overall design maintains the modest scale and vernacular architectural details appropriate for the Marina Historic District. The proposal meets the intent of the review criteria above; thus, positive findings are made with respect to the sections indicated above. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve Certificate of Appropriateness 2017-267 for 170 Marine Way, Marina Historic District, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations Section 2.4.6(H)(5). C. Deny Certificate of Appropriateness 2017-267 for 170 Marine Way, Marina Historic District, by finding that the request and approval thereof does not meet the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations Section 2.4.6(H)(5). RECOMMENDATION Certificate of Approval (COA) Approve the COA 2017-267 for 170 Marine Way, Marina Historic District, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations Section 2.4.6(H)(5). NOTE: If the COA is approved, the following must be addressed prior to certification: 1. That the date of original submission and revision dates be indicated in the Revision Box on all plan sheets. 2. That the "Floor Plan Key Note Legend" box, on sheet A201, be revised to correct the notes referencing the condenser and electrical meter. In addition, a note for the trash/refuse facilities is added. Attachments: • Applicant Justification Statement • Site plan, elevation, and survey Report Prepared By: Michelle Hoyland, Principal Planner and Abraham Fogel, Planner in Training CITY OF DELRAY BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD BOARD ORDER Project Name: 170 Marine Way Address: 170 Marine Way, Marina Historic District File Number: 2017-267 ORDER Following consideration of all the evidence and testimony presented at the February 7, 2018 meeting before the Historic Preservation Board for the City of Delray Beach and pursuant to the respective Section(s) of the Land Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach, the Historic Preservation Board finds that there is ample and competent substantial evidence to support the findings, as applicable, for the referenced projects. Request&LDR Section Approved Approved wi*h Denied** Conditions CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 2.4.6(H)(5) 7.Q *Conditions of Approval are attached as Exhibit A. **For a denial, the list of findings not supported by the Board are attached as Exhibit B. Chi istoric Preservation Board Return Original to: Randall Strofft Architects 42 N. Swinton Ave Delray Beach, FL 33444 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: February 7, 2018 ITEM: 19 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District - Certificate of Appropriateness (2017-247) for exterior addition and renovations and Variance (2017-246) to reduce the side interior setback from the required 10' to 8.5'. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Certificate of Appropriateness and Variance GENERAL DATA: Owner Olga Adler George Bush Blvd t» Agent. Roger Cope, Cope Architecture, Inc. r p, . '? •4 . 0� r s� 7. f 1 .re Location. North side of Dixie Boulevard, 4 between NE 5th Street and NE 6th A s --•=- NE�- Street. "' a '.` Property Size• 0.161 Acres 1.,. r iE - �q It; ,m• .. Historic District: Del-Ida Park Historic District zafg i' q ... Zoning. R-1-AA (Single-Family Residential) ' NE 6th St - lw '` L. Adjacent Zoning Z North: R-1-AA t 4' ?11` East: R-1-AA , , �► South: R-1-AA ='t West: R-1-AAilk 4. r Existing Future Land 3 ' o�'a • 5 s Use Designation. LD (Low Density 0-5 DU/Acre) a `- `„IOW, c " ?°�,"* { -i qv ; - `! Water Service Public water service is provided w" 4 on site. r ; . :.s I { • ' or s ati Sewer Service. Public sewer service is provided on site. • :� ,� A :. . ,. _E. .� NORTH NSthSt • ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness (2017-247) and Variance (2017-246) requests associated with a 674 square foot exterior addition, renovations, new pool, landscaping and hardscaping to the property located at 19 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District, pursuant to Land Development Regulation (LDR) Section 2.4.6(H) and 2.4.7(A). BACKGROUND & PROJECT DESCRIPTION The property is located within the R-1-AA (Single Family Residential) zoning district. The 0.16-acre lot measures 50' wide x 140' deep and contains a 1,018 square foot existing single-family residence and 587 square foot guest cottage. The historic structures were built in 1925 and are classified as contributing to the Del-Ida Park Historic District. According to the City Property cards, the historic structure had a floorplan consisting of five rooms, flat roof covered in gravel, wood frame, and stucco exterior walls. The structure exhibits mission-style architecture. The subject COA request for exterior renovations and addition to the single-family residence and guest cottage includes: 1. Installation of new impact resistant windows and doors; 2. Paint the structure white with black accents; 3. Construction of a 674 square foot addition connecting the single-family residence and the guest cottage; 4. Construction of a new pool and associated deck; 5. Installation of new exterior light fixtures; 6. Installation of a new emergency generator; and, 7. Reconfiguration of the existing brick paver driveway. The subject request also includes a variance to allow the proposed addition to encroach 1.5' into the required 10' side interior setback on the North side of the property. The COA and variance request are now before the Board for consideration. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSAL Pursuant to Land Development Regulation (LDR) Section 2.4.6(H)(5), prior to approval, a finding must be made that any Certificate of Appropriateness which is to be approved is consistent with Historic Preservation purposes pursuant to Objective A-4 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and specifically with provisions of Section 4.5.1, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. LDR SECTION 4.5.1, HISTORIC PRESERVATION, DESIGNATED DISTRICTS, SITES, AND BUILDINGS Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E) - Development Standards: all new development or exterior improvements on individually designated historic properties and/or properties located within historic districts shall, comply with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and the Development Standards of this Section. Standard 2 The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. Standard 9 New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and 19 Dixie Boulevard,2017-247 and 2017-246 Page 2 of 6 shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. The proposal meets the applicable standards noted above and their intent as the proposed changes ensure an appropriate renovation and addition of the existing historic structure. The renovations include new aluminum framed (anodized bronze) impact resistant windows and doors, a Mahogany entry door, new exterior light fixtures, construction of a new pool and associated deck, installation of a new emergency generator, and reconfiguration of the brick paver driveway to improve an existing non-conformity. The exterior color scheme will be changed from yellow stucco with dark blue accents to white painted stucco and black accents. The addition will include a new kitchen and living area that connects the single-family residence to the guest cottage. The proposed changes do not destroy historic features that characterize the structure. Overall, the proposed changes protect the historic integrity of the existing structure and its environment by allowing for modernization and expansion of the existing structure utilizing durable materials. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(2)(b)(2) - Major Development. The subject application is considered "Major Development" as it involves "alteration of a building in excess of 25 percent of the existing floor area, and all appurtenances." Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(7) - Visual Compatibility Standards: new construction and all improvements to both contributing and noncontributing buildings, structures and appurtenances thereto within a designated historic district or on an individually designated property shall be visually compatible. In addition to the Zoning District Regulations, the Historic Preservation Board shall apply the visual compatibility standards provided for in this Section with regard to height, width, mass, scale, facade, openings, rhythm, material, color, texture, roof shape, direction, and other criteria set forth elsewhere in Section 4.5.1. Visual compatibility for minor and major development as referenced in Section 4.5.1(E)(2) shall be determined by utilizing criteria contained in (a)-(m). Visual compatibility for all development on individually designated properties outside the district shall be determined by comparison to other structures within the site. Applicable Visual Compatibility Standards (a) Height: The height of proposed buildings or modifications shall be visually compatible in comparison or relation to the height of existing structures and buildings in a historic district for all major and minor development. For major development, visual compatibility with respect to the height of residential structures, as defined by 4.5.1(E)(2)(a), shall also be determined through application of the Building Height Plane. (b)Front Facade Proportion: The front facade of each building or structure shall be visually compatible with and be in direct relationship to the width of the building and to the height of the front elevation of other existing structures and buildings within the subject historic district. (c) Proportion of Openings (Windows and Doors): The openings of any building within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the openings exemplified by prevailing historic architectural styles of similar buildings within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors to the height of windows and doors among buildings shall be visually compatible within the subject historic district. (d) Rhythm of Solids to Voids: The relationship of solids to voids of a building or structure shall be visually compatible with existing historic buildings or structures within the subject historic district for all development, with particular attention paid to the front facades. (g)Relationship of Materials, Texture, and Color: The relationship of materials, texture, and color of the facade of a building and/or hardscaping shall be visually compatible with the 19 Dixie Boulevard,2017-247 and 2017-246 Page3of6 predominant materials used in the historic buildings and structures within the subject historic district. (j) Scale of a Building: The size of a building and the building mass in relation to open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, porches, and lot size shall be visually compatible with the building size and mass of historic buildings and structures within a historic district for all development. To determine whether the scale of a building is appropriate, the following shall apply for major development only: 1. For buildings wider than sixty percent (60%) of the lot width, a portion of the front façade must be setback a minimum of seven (7) additional feet from the front setback line. 2. For buildings deeper than fifty percent (50%) of the lot depth, a portion of each side façade, which is greater than one story high, must be setback a minimum of five (5) additional feet from the side setback line. (I) Architectural Style: All major and minor development shall consist of only one (1) architectural style per structure or property and not introduce elements definitive of another style. (m) Additions to individually designated properties and contributing structures in all historic districts. Visual compatibility shall be accomplished as follows: 1. Additions shall be located to the rear or least public side of a building and be as inconspicuous as possible. 2. Additions or accessory structures shall not be located in front of the established front wall plane of a historic building. 3. Characteristic features of the original building shall not be destroyed or obscured. 4. Additions shall be designed and constructed so that the basic form and character of the historic building will remain intact if the addition is ever removed. 5. Additions shall not introduce a new architectural style, mimic too closely the style of the existing building nor replicate the original design, but shall be coherent in design with the existing building. 6. Additions shall be secondary and subordinate to the main mass of the historic building and shall not overwhelm the original building. The proposed renovation and addition to the single-family residence and guest cottage is appropriate and compatible with the Del-Ida Park Historic District. The height of the addition does not exceed the highest element of the existing residence. The extension of the kitchen component on the North elevation does not alter the front façade proportion. The new windows and doors are compatible with the existing proportion of openings. The exterior color scheme will change from yellow stucco with dark blue accents to white painted stucco and black accents. These changes will not alter the visual compatibility of structure within the Del-Ida Historic District since the existing stucco and semi-smooth texture will remain. The scale of the building will not be substantially altered since the addition will be in exact alignment with the existing kitchen component on the North side of the property nor will the renovation/addition introduce a new architectural style. Replica emblem/motifs will be added to the addition to match the existing emblem/diamond motifs. New barrel tile and a heavy timber eyebrow are proposed on South elevation, East elevation, and West Elevation. These new elements are visually compatible with the historic mission-style of the property. The overall proposal maintains mission-style architectural details appropriate for the Del-Ida Park Historic District. The proposal meets the intent of the review criteria above; thus, positive findings are made with respect to the sections indicated above. 19 Dixie Boulevard,2017-247 and 2017-246 >w Page 4 of 6 VARIANCE ANALYSIS Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), required side setbacks within the R-1-AA District are 10'. The subject request is a variance to allow construction of an addition that connects the single-family residence to the guest cottage to encroach 1.5' into the required 10' side interior setback on the North side of the property. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.2.6(D), the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) shall act on all variance requests within an historic district, or on a historic site, which otherwise would be acted upon by the Board of Adjustment. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(A)(5) Variances, the following findings must be made prior to the approval of a variance: (a) That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not generally applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings subject to the same zoning (The matter of economic hardship shall not constitute a basis for the granting of a variance); (b)That literal interpretation of the regulations would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties subject to the same zoning; (c) That the special conditions and circumstances have not resulted from actions of the applicant; (d)That granting the variance will not confer onto the applicant any special privilege that is denied to other lands, structures, and buildings under the same zoning. Neither the permitted, nor nonconforming use, of neighborhood lands, structures, or buildings under the same zoning shall be considered grounds for the issuance of a variance; (e) That the reasons set forth in the variance petition justify the granting of the variance, and that the variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure; and, (f) That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of existing regulations, will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. The property owner has submitted the following justification statement(attached). "We recognize that LDR Section 4.3, (H), (1): Setbacks address building setback guidelines. The "Side Yard Building Setback Line"requirement for our site is 10, as we are within an R-1-AA zoning district. The rationale behind our request is that keeping our proposed addition ("wing') in exact alignment with the existing Kitchen component on that side (North) of the Floor Plan: it makes the most structural sense (no odd offset), interior layout and flow of the plan sense (no odd offset), allows for an additional 1.5'of area to be used within our Pool area/courtyard, and most importantly —has been tastefully designed so that it has negligible to no negative impact on our immediate next door neighbor. We feel the intent of the code, in all matters, will not be compromised in any fashion whatsoever! In conclusion, if granted, the "Variance" would in no way "be contrary to the public interest and where owing to the conditions peculiar to the property and not the result of the actions of the landowner, a literal enforcement of the regulations would result in unnecessary and undue hardship" Furthermore, we feel `that the reasons set forth in the "Variance" petition justify the granting of the "Variance, and we feel that the "Variance"is the minimum "Variance"that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure"and finally "that the granting of the 19 Dixie Boulevard,2017-247 and 2017-246 Page 5 of 6 k "Variance"will be in (complete) harmony with the general purpose and intent of existing regulations, will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare" For these reasons, the owner respectfully requests that this variance be granted." The variance is to allow a reduction to the required 10' side interior setback to 8.5' to accommodate the addition that connects the single-family residence to the guest cottage. A paved driveway exists in a portion of this location. Special conditions and circumstances exist due to the small size of the 50' wide property as well as the historic setting of the site within the Del-Ida Park Historic District. Further, the variance is the minimum necessary to preserve the historic character of the property while allowing for the modernization of the floorplan. It will not significantly diminish the historic character of the site or the district. Literal interpretation of the requirements of the code would alter the historic character and scale of the property as it is situated within the Del-Ida Park Historic District. The variance is necessary to accommodate an appropriate adaptive reuse of the historic structure and site. Finally, the variance is not contrary to the public interest, safety or welfare. Note: As required by the LDRs, a notice regarding the subject variance request was sent to those property owners located within a 500' radius of the subject property as well as a Special Courtesy Notice to the Del-Ida Park Neighborhood Association. The submitted justification statements are attached. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve Certificate of Appropriateness (2017-247) and Variance requests (2017-246) for the property located at 19 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in LDR Sections 2.4.6(H)(5), and 2.4.7(A)(5). C. Deny Certificate of Appropriateness (2017-247) and Variance requests (2017-246)for the property located at 19 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District by finding that the request and approval thereof is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet the criteria set forth in LDR Sections 2.4.6(H)(5), and 2.4.7(A)(5). RECOMMENDATIONS Certificate of Approval (COA) Approve the COA 2017-247 for 19 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations Section 2.4.6(H)(5). NOTE: If the COA is approved, the following must be addressed prior to certification: 1. That the height dimension of the addition on the North elevation be measured to the top of the parapet. 2. That the site plan and floor plan indicate the air conditioning unit, pool equipment, and generator in the same configuration. 3. That the dimension of the driveway between the property line and fence (area where vehicles are parked) be indicated. • 19 Dixie Boulevard,2017-247 and 2017-246 Page 6 of 6 Variance Approve the variance to allow a reduction to the required 10' side interior setback to 8.5', based upon positive findings to LDR Section 2.4.7(A)(5). Attachments: • Applicant Justification Statement • Site plan, elevations, and survey Report Prepared by: Michelle Hoyland, Principal Planner and Abraham Fogel, Planner in Training CITY OF DELRAY BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD BOARD ORDER Project Name: 19 Dixie Boulevard Address: 19 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District File Number: 2017-246 ORDER Following consideration of all the evidence and testimony presented at the February 7, 2018 meeting before the Historic Preservation Board for the City of Delray Beach and pursuant to the respective Section(s) of the Land Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach, the Historic Preservation Board finds that there is ample and competent substantial evidence to support the findings, as applicable, for the referenced projects. Request&LDR Section Approved Approved with Denied** Conditions* CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 2.4.6(H)(5) D VARIANCE 2.4.7(A)(5) *Conditions of Approval are attached as Exhibit A. **For a denial, the list of findings not supported by the Board are attached as Exhibit B. 74— Chair�/ Historic Preservation Board Return Original to: Cope Architects, Inc. 1142 NE 1'`Avenue Delray Beach, FL 33444