24-95 ORDINANCE NO. 24-95
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 4.4.13,
"CENTRAL BUSINESS (CBD) DISTRICT", SUBSECTION
4.4.13(F), "DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS", OF THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH,
FLORIDA, BY ADDING SUBPARAGRAPH 4.4.13(F)(2) TO
REDUCE THE MINIMUM OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT WITHIN THE
CBD ZONING DISTRICT; AMENDING SECTION 4.3.4(K),
"DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MATRIX", BY AMENDING THE
MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE REFERENCE FOR THE CENTRAL
BUSINESS DISTRICT; PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER
CLAUSE, A SAVING CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to LDR Section 1.1.6, the Planning and
Zoning Board reviewed the subject matter at its meeting of April 17,
1995, and has forwarded the change with a recommendation of ~pproval
by unanimous vote; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Florida Statute 163.3174(4)(c), the
Planning and Zoning Board, sitting as the Local Planning Agency, has
determined that the change is consistent with, and furthers the
objectives and policies of, the Comprehensive Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Chapter Four, "Zoning Regulations", Article
4.4, "Base Zoning District", Section 4.4.13, "Central Business (CBD)
District", Subsection 4.4.13(F), "Development Standards", of the Land
Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, be, and
the same is hereby amended to read as follows:
(F) Development Standards: ~//~~//~//~he
development standards set forth in Section 4.3.4
.~hall apply, except as modified below//~/~W~
(1) Height: The CBD is a geographic area in
which exceptions to height regulations are allowed.
(2) .Open Space: A minimum of 10% nQn-vghicul~r
open space shall be provided; however, within the
area encompassed by the boundaries of the original
Downtown Development Authority as described in
Section 8.2.2(B). and within th~ ~ion Qf %h~ CBD
zoning district located east of .the Intracoastal
Waterway, ~here shall be no minimum open spa~e
requirement, Notwithstanding the provisions of thi~
section, the body acting upon a development
application within the CBD may require that open
areas, including but not limited to courtyards.
plazas, and landscaped setbacks, be provided in order
to add interest and provide relief from the building
mass.
Section 2, That Chapter Four, "Zoning Regulations", Article
4.3, "District Regulations, General Provisions", Section 4.3.4, "Base
District Development Standards", Subsection 4.3.4(K), "Development
Standards Matrix", of the Land Development Regulations of the City of
Delray Beach, Florida, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as
follows:
Maximum
Lot Coverage
Central Business District (CBD) f~y
Section 3, That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in
conflict herewith be, and the same are hereby repealed.
Section 4, That should any section or provision of this
ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence, or word be
declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a
whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid.
Section 5. That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon passage on second and final reading.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final
reading on this the 16th day of May 1995
ATTEST:
' citY C~erk '
First Reading May 2, 1995
Second Reading May 16, 1995
- 2 - Ord. No. 24-95
CITY COMMISSION DOCUMENTATION
TO: DAVID T. HARDEN , MAN.AGER
FROM: DIANE DOMINGUEZ ,]~ ~ A4~
ZO
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING &
SUBJECT: MEETING OF MAY 2, 1995
AMENDMENT TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS REDUCING
THE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT IN THE CBD ZONING DISTRICT
ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION:
The action requested of the City Commission is that of
approval of an amendment reducing the open space
requirement in the CBD (Central Business District) zoning
district. The affected LDR sections are 4.4.13(F) and
4.3.4(K).
BACKGROUND:
The original version of this amendment was before the City
Commission on February 3, 1995. As proposed at the time, it
would have reduced the open space requirement in the CBD from
25% to 10%, and to 0% in the original Downtown Development
Authority (DDA) area. The Commission wanted the 0% requirement
to extend to the CBD area east of the Intracoastal as well. The
amendment was denied on first reading in order to allow for that
change to be made.
As this amendment refers to the original DDA area, staff has
taken this opportunity to correct the way that the DDA area is
described in the LDRs. The existing lengthy legal description
will be supplemented by a map that illustrates both the original
and expanded DDA. Those changes are being processed as a
separate amendment.
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION:
The Planning and Zoning Board formally reviewed this item at its
meeting of April 17, 1995. There was no public comment given,
and the Board recommended unanimously that it be approved.
RECOMMEND ED ACTION:
By motion, approve the proposed amendments to LDR Section 4.4.13
(F) and 4.3.4(K) as described in the attached Planning and
Zoning Board staff report.
Attachment:
* P&Z Staff Report & Documentation of April 17, 1995
* Ordinance by others
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT
MEETING OF: APRIL 17, 1994
AGENDA ITEM: V.L. REVISED LDR AMENDMENT REDUCING OPEN SPACE
REQUIREMENTS IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD:
The item before the Board is that of making a
recommendation to the City Commission on a revised LDR
amendment reducing the open space requirements in the CBD
zoning district.
BACKGROUND:
This amendment was originally before the Board at its meeting of
January 23, 1995. At that meeting, the Board voted to forward a
recommendation to the City Commission that properties within the
original DDA (Downtown Development Authority) area have no
minimum open space requirement, and that the remainder of the
CBD be required to provide at least 10%.
Staff worded the amendment to include the phrase "the area
encompassed by the boundaries of the Downtown Development
Authority as originally established on March 22, 1971." This
original DDA area is currently described by a lengthy legal
description provided in Section 8.2 of the LDRs.
When the amendment was forwarded to the City Commission via the
City Manager, the City Manager requested that changes be made to
include an abbreviated legal description of the original DDA
within the CBD district regulations. Those changes were
incorporated and forwarded to the City Commission.
The City Commission held the first reading of the amendment on
February 3, 1995. The Commission felt that in addition to the
original DDA area, the CBD area east of the Intracoastal
Waterway should also have no minimum open space requirement.
The ordinance was denied on first reading in order to make that
change.
In making the changes, staff determined that including the
abbreviated DDA description in the CBD zoning regulations was a
bit problematic in terms of context. We also noted that the
description of the expanded DDA as adopted in 1993 was never
added to LDR Section 8.2. Rather than including legal
descriptions that are difficult for the general public to
interpret, an amendment is proposed that will provide a map of
both the original and expanded DDA areas within Section 8.2.
That amendment is being processed concurrent with this open
space amendment.
P & Z Board Memorandum Report
LDR Amendment Re: Open Space in the CBD
Page 2
PROPOSED AMENDMENT
The revised amendment is as follows:
(F) Development Standards: ~ ~~ Z~ Z~he development
standards set forth in Section 4.3.4 shall apply, except as
modified below~ ~ f~W~ ~ ~ ~:
(1) Height: The CBD is a geographic area in which
exceptions to height regulations are allowed.
(2) Open Space: A minimum of 10% non-vehicular open space
shall be provided} however, within the area encompassed by
the boundaries of the oriqinal DDA as described in Section
8.2.2(B)~ and within the section of the CBD zoninq district
located east of the Intracoastal Waterway, there shall be
no minimum open space requirement. Notwithstandinq the
provisions of this section~ the body actinq upon a
development application within the CBD may require that
open areas, includinq but not limited to courtyards~
plazas, and landscaped setbacks, be provided in order to
add interest and provide relief from the buildinq mass.
In addition to the above, that section of the Development
Standards Matrix [LDR Section 4.3.4(K)] dealing with maximum
coverage in the CBD will also be amended to refer to this
specific regulation.
ANALYSIS:
The ordinance as proposed expands the zero open space
requirement beyond that which was originally recommended by the
P & Z Board. This is consistent with the intent of this
amendment, in that the area east of the ICWW is already
developed at an intensity similar to the properties located in
the original DDA. Many of the sites are currently nonconforming
as to open space, but will become conforming as a result of this
amendment. While no minimum open space is required in the
designated areas, the amendment does give the reviewing board
the authority to require open space or open areas when
appropriate.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion, recommend that City Commission adopt the proposed
ordinance reducing the open space requirement in the CBD, and
amending the Development Standards Matrix to reflect that
change.
CITY COMMISSION DOCUMENTATION
~ IS~
DIANE DOMINGUEZ ,, ff
FROM: DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & ZON~N%
SUBJECT: MEETING OF MAY 2, 1995
AMENDMENT TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS REDUCING
THE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT IN THE CBD ZONING DISTRICT
ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION:
The action requested of the City Commission is that of
approval of an amendment reducing the open space
requirement in the CBD (Central Business District) zoning
district. The affected LDR sections are 4.4.13(F) and
4.3.4(K).
BACKGROUND:
The original version of this amendment was before the City
Commission on February 3, 1995. As proposed at the time, it
would have reduced the open space requirement in the CBD from
25% to 10%, and to 0% in the original Downtown Development
Authority (DDA) area. The Commission wanted the 0% requirement
to extend to the CBD area east of the Intracoastal as well. The
amendment was denied on first reading in order to allow for that
change to be made.
As this amendment refers to the original DDA area, staff has
taken this opportunity to correct the way that the DDA area is
described in the LDRs. The existing lengthy legal description
will be supplemented by a map that illustrates both the original
and expanded DDA. Those changes are being processed as a
separate amendment.
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION:
The Planning and Zoning Board formally reviewed this item at its
meeting of April 17, 1995. There was no public comment given,
and the Board recommended unanimously that it be approved.
RECOMMEND ED ACTION:
By motion, approve the proposed amendments to LDR Section 4.4.13
(F) and 4.3.4(K) as described in the attached Planning and
Zoning Board staff report.
Attachment:
* P&Z Staff Report & Documentation of April 17, 1995
* Ordinance by others
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER~
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM ~ /~'A' - MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7. 1995
FIRST READING FOR ORDINANCE NO. 12-95/OPEN SPACE
REOUIREMENTS IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
DATE: FEBRUARY 3, 1995
This is first reading for Ordinance No. 12-95 which amends the Land
Development Regulations by reducing open space requirements within
the Central Business District (CBD). The amendment was initiated
by the City Commission on November 1, 1994, at the request of the
Community Redevelopment Agency, based on the premise that the
current 25% open space requirement is inappropriate for the
downtown area, especially along Atlantic Avenue where buildings
extend to property lines. Please refer to the staff documentation
for further analysis.
The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this item on January 23,
1995. The initial proposal was to delete the minimum open space
requirement entirely from the CBD, leaving it to the approving
board (SPRAB) to determine on a case by case basis if any open
space should be provided. While the Board supported the deletion
for 'that area lying within the original DDA boundaries, they felt a
minimum open space requirement of 10% should continue for the rest
of the CBD. The Board voted unanimously to recommend approval of
the modified amendment.
Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 12-95 on first reading. If
passed, public hearing on February 21, 1995.
ORDINANCE NO. 12-95
~ OIU:)INANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 4.4.13,
'CENTRAL BUSINESS (CBD) DISTRICT", SUBSECTION
4.4.13(F), "DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS", OF THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH,
FLORIDA, BY ADDING SUBPARAGRAPH 4.4.13(F)(2) TO
REDUCE THE MINIMUM OpEN SPACE REQUIREMENT WITHIN THE
CBD ZONING DISTRICT& AMENDING SECTION 4.3.4(K),
'DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MATRIX", BY AMENDING THE
MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE REFERENCE FOR THE CENTRAL
BUSINESS DISTRICT~ PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER
CLAUSE, A SAVING CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to LDR Section 1.1.6, the Planning and
Zoning Board reviewed the subject matter at its meeting of January 23,
~995, and has forwarded the change with a recommendation of approval
by unanimous vote& and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Florida Statute 163.3174(4)(c), the
Planning and Zoning Board, sitting as the Local Planning Agency, has
determined that the change is consistent with, and furthers the
objectives and policies of, the Comprehensive Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
~ That Chapter Four, "Zoning Regulations", Article
4.4, "Base Zoning District", Section 4..4 13, "Central Business (CBD)
District", Subsection 4.4.13(F), "Development Standards", of the Land
Development Regulations of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, be, and
the same is hereby amended to read as follows:
(F) Development Standards: ~//~~¢~//~//~he
development standards set forth in Section 4.3.4
except as modified
(1) Height: The CBD is a geographic area in
which exceptions to height regulations are allowed.
[2~ O~_en Space= A minimum of 10% non-vehicular
Q~en space sha~l be ~rovided: however, within the
area encompassed by the boundaries of the Downtown
Development AuthOrity as ori~inally established on
~arch 22. 1971. there shall be Do minimum oDen sDace
requirement. Notwithstan~in~ the ~rovisions of Chis
section, the bo~v actin~ upon a development
application within the CBD may recuire that open
areas, including b~ Dot limited to courtyards.
plazas and landscaued setbacks, be urovided in order
~o add interest and prQ¥ide relief krom the buildine
Th9 original boundaries of the Downtown Development
Authority are generally desCribed as follows:
Commencing 'at a point where Northeast 1st Street
i~tersects with the Intracoastal Waterway. run west
along Northeast 1st Street to Swinton Avenue. then
south along Swinton Avenue to the intersection of
~winton Avenue with the east-west alley south of
Atlantic AvenUe in Block 69 (as in Plat Book 2. Page
43) and Block 77 (as in Plat Book 1. Paee 3). then
east along the alley to the intersection with the
north-south alley in Block 77. then south along that
a~ley tQ ~Qutheast 1st Street. then east along
Southeast 1st Street to the intersection with the
north-south alley in Block 117 (as in Plat Book 1. _
Page 9) east of Southeast 6th Avenue. then north
along the alley in Block 117 to the northwest corner
of Lot 18. Block 117. then east along the south line
Of Lot 17 of Block 117. and the south line of Lots
~0. 49. 57 and 92 of Palm Square an unrecorded plat
~Qcated in Block 125 and the North Half of Block 133.
aS in Plat Book 1. Page 3~. to the Intracoastal
Waterway. then north alone the Intracoastal Waterway.
tO ~he Point of Beginning.
~ That Chapter Four, "Zoning Regulations", Article
4.3, "District Regulations, ~eneral Provisions", Section 4.3.4, "Base
District Development Standards", Subsection 4.3.4(K), "Development
Standards Matrix", of the Land Development Regulations of the City of
Delray Beach, Florida, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as
follows:
Maximum
Lot Coverage
Central Business District (CBD) ~ ~)
~ That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in
conflict herewith be, an~'the same are hereby repealed.
- 2 - Ord. No. 12-95
~ That should any section or provision of this
ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence, or word be
declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a
whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid.
~_~ That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon passage on second and final reading.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final
reading on this the day of , 1995.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
First Reading
Second Reading
- 3 - Ora. No. 12-95
CITY COMMISSION DOCUMENTATION
TO: DAVID T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER
FROM: DIANE DOMINGUEZ, ~\
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & %ZONING
SUBJECT: MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 1995
AMENDMENT TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRs)
REDUCING OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS IN THE CBD (CENTRAL
BUSINESS DISTRICT) ZONING DISTRICT.
ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION:
The action requested of the City Commission is that of
aDproval of an amendment to the LDRs, regarding open space
requirements in the CBD zoning district.
The affected LDR sections are 4.4.13(F), Central Business
District, Development Standards, and 4.3.4(K), Development
Standards Matrix.
B A C K G R O U N D:
This amendment was initiated by the City Commission on November
1, 1994, at the request of CRA Director Chris Brown. The
attached staff report provides the background and analysis of
the request, including the recommendations of the Community
Redevelopment Agency (CRA) and the Downtown Development
Authority (DDA).
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION:
The Planning and Zoning Board formally reviewed this item at its
meeting of January 23, 1995. The amendment proposed to delete
the minimum open space requirement (currently at 25%) for the
entire area zoned CBD, replacing it with language that allows
the approving body (i.e. SPRAB) to determine on a case by case
basis if any open space should be provided.
The Board supported the deletion of any minimum open space
requirement within the'original DDA area (roughly, between N.E.
1st St. and $.E. 1st St., between Swinton Avenue and the
Intracoastal Waterway). However, they felt that a minimum
requirement of 10% should apply to the remainder of the CBD. It
was the Board's position that a minimum requirement would ensure
that some open area was being provided, and that 10% was more
City Commission Documentation
LDR Amendment to Open Space Requirements in the CBD
Page 2
realistic in a downtown setting than the current 25%
requirement. The Board voted unanimously to recommend the
amendment as modified.
PROPOSED AMENDMENT
The amendment, as modified by the Planning and Zoning Board's
recommendation, is as follows:
* Amendment to Section 4.4.13 - Central Business District
(F) Development Standards: ~ ~~ ~ ~The_
development standards set forth in Section 4.3.4 shall apply,
except as modified below~ ~M~ f~II~W~M~ ~M~II ~I~ ~I~:
(2) Open Space: A minimum of 10% non-vehicular open space
shall be provided; however~ within the area encompassed by the
boundaries of the Downtown Development Agency as originally
established on March 22~ 1971~ there shall be no minimum open
space requirement. Notwithstanding the provisions of this
section~ the body acting upon a development application within
the CBD may require that open areas~ including but not limited
to courtyards~ plazas~ and landscaped setbacks~ be provided in
order to add interest and provide relief from the building mass.
* Amendment to Section 4.3.4(K) - Development Standards
Matrix - Nonresidential Zoning Districts
For the Central Business District zoning, under the column
entitled "Maximum Lot Coverage," replace the number "(3)"
referring to the 25% open space requirement, with the number
"(1)", which instructs users to refer to the individual zoning
district ordinance for the specific regulation.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion, approve the amendment to Sections 4.4.13 (F) and
4.3.4 (K) of the Land Development Regulations as proposed
herein.
Attachment:
* P&Z Staff Report & Documentation of January 23, 1995.
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT
MEETING OF: JANUARY 23, 1995
AGENDA ITEM: V. B. AMENDMENT TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT
REGULATIONS REDUCING THE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS
IN THE CBD (CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT).
ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD:
The item before the Board is that of making a
recommendation to the City Commission regarding an
amendment to the Land Development Regulations (LDRs).
The affected sections are 4.4.13(F), Central Business
District, Development Standards, and 4.3.4(K), Development
Standards Matrix.
BACKGROUND:
This amendment was initiated by the City Commission on November
1, 1994, at the request of CRA Director Chris Brown. The basis
for the request was that the current minimum open space
requirement of 25% is not appropriate for the downtown area,
especially along Atlantic Avenue where buildings extend to
property lines, .leaving little or no ability to provide open
space.
ANALYSIS:
Prior to 1990, there was no minimum open space requirement in
the CBD. With the adoption of the LDRs in 1990, a 25% open
space requirement was added to a number of zoning districts,
including the CBD.
Planning staff and CRA staff have agreed for some time that the
25% requirement is impractical for a downtown setting. In the
original Downtown Development Authority (DDA) area--one block
north and south of Atlantic Avenue frO~ Swinton Avenue to ~he
Intracoastal--structures can be built without front, rear, or
side setbacks. The intent of these reduced standards is to
encourage dense, compact, development that iS urban in nature.
The 25% open space requirement seems contrary to that intent,
and most properties in the original DDA area do not meet that
standard.
The proposed amendment would delete the 25% minimum requirement
for the CBD and add the following language to Section 4.4.13
(F), CBD Development Standards:
V.B.
P & Z Board Memorandum Staff Report
LDR Amendment RE: Open Space Requirement in the CBD
Page 2
(2) Open Space: There Is no minimum open space
requirement in the CBD zoning district. However, the
approving body acting upon a development application may
require the provision of areas such as courtyards, plazas,
landscaped setbacks, etc., in order to add interest and
provide relief from building mass.
The Development Standards Matrix will also be amended to delete
the 25% open space requirement from the column titled "Maximum
Floor Area."
As a result of this amendment, the buildings along Atlantic
Avenue would become conforming with respect to open space. The
amendment would allow' the accommodation of, the type of denSe-
urban development that is appropriate in a downtown setting, an~
wOuld delete an impediment to future redevelopment of the area.
While no minimum open area is established, the approving board
has the ability to require landscaped and open areas where
appropriate. _.
As written, the amendment would apply to all property zoned CBD,
including those areas north and south of the one-way pairs, and
east of the Intracoastal. In reality, however, properties
outside of the original DDA area would continue to be subject to
code requirements that will ensure the provision of .a certain
amount of open space. Those properties must provide a 10'
building setback along the front, street side, and rear, which ...
will provide for some landscaped areas. Additionally, most
developments north and south of the downtown core have their own
parking lots, which by code must have perimeter and interior
landscaping. And as provided in the proposed amendment,
additional open space could be required by the approving board
where appropriate.
REVIEW BY OTHERS:
The CRA Board considered this item at its meeting of December 8,
1994, but deferred taking action based upon concerns over
whether or not it should apply to the entire CBD, or only to the
original DDA area. That discussion was~continued to the mee%ing
of January 12, 1995. At that meeting the Board discussed the
potential for redevelopment of Pineapple Grove Main Street, and
also noted that many buildings in the CBD district east of the
Intracoastal do not currently conform to the 25% requirement.
Following that discussion the consensus of the Board was that
the 25% minimum should be deleted from the entire CBD. They
voted unanimously to- recommend approval of the amendment as
proposed.
P & Z Board Memorandum Staff Report
LDR Amendment RE: Open Space Requirement in the CBD
Page 3 -"
The DDA Board considered the amendment at its meeting of January
18, 1995. The members supported the deletion of the minimum
open space requirement from the original DDA area and along
Atlantic Avenue east of the Intracoastal. They stated that the
25% should continue to apply to the remainder of the CBD, but
that there should be some ability to waive the requirement where
appropriate.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion, approve the proposed amendment to the Land
Development Regulations as follows:
* Add Section 4.4.13 (F)(2) to eliminate the 25% minimum open
space requirement from the CBD zoning district; and,
* Delete the 25% minimum open space requirement for the CBD
district from the Development Standards Matrix -'[Section
4.3.4(K)] .
Report prepared by: Diane Dominguez
T:PZCBDOS.DOC