Loading...
03-72 ORDINANCE NO. 3-72. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, LEVYING THE ASSESSMENTS AS SHOWN BY THE ASSESSMENT ROLL SUBMITTED BY THE CITY MANAGER OF SAID CITY, CONCERNING THE OPENING, GRADING AND PAVING OF THE NORTH- SOUTH SIXTEEN (16) FOOT ALLEY IN BLOCK 1, ROSEMONT PARK SUBDIVISION TO A WIDTH OF SIXTEEN (16) FEET. WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, has in pursuance to the Charter of said City, submitted to the City Council for approval, a report of the costs, and the assessment roll for the opening, grading and paving of the North- South sixteen (16) foot alley in Block 1, Rosemont Park Subdivision to a width of sixteen (16) feet. WHEREAS, said report and assessment roll was approved by the City Council in regular session on the 24th day of January, 1972, and WHEREAS, due notice concerning said assessment roll was given by advertisement, by the City Clerk, in accordance with the City Charter of said City, and for the purpose of hearing ob- jections to said assessment roll, and WHEREAS, no sufficient objections were received to the confirmation of said assessment roll. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The assessments, as shown by said assess- ment roll which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby levied against the properties shown and in the amounts stat- ed on said assessment roll, said assessments to be paid in three equal annual installments, together with interest at the rate of ~ per annum, the first installment becoming due and payable on April 12, 1972, and on the 12th of April for the next ensuing two years; and said special assessments, so levied, shall be a lien from the date the assessments become effective, upon the respective lots and parcels of land described in said assessment roll, of the same nature and to the same extent as the liens for general City taxes, and shall be collectible in the same manner and with the same penal- ties and under the same provisions as to sale and forfeiture as City taxes are collectible. PASSED in regular session on second and final reading on this the 13th day of March , 1972. ATTEST: First Reading February 28, 1972. Second Reading March 13, 1972 DELRAY BEACH NEWS-JOURNAL Published Weekly Delray Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF FLORIDA ~ COUNTY OF PALM BEACH Before the undersigned authority personally appeared ...g....a...r.~.....L..?......G...°....°..d..e....r. ................. who on oath says that he~2fe is ..... ~l~.],,.i.~h~X ................................. of The Delray Beach News-Journal, a weekly newspaper published at Delray Beach in Palm Beach County, Flor- ida; that the attached copy of advertisement, being a0.~:.d..Cap/:1.on...~.3..-..7.2 ................. in the matter of ...Le.v.¥.Ln~...Aase,~.~men~:s....on..Aas. a~e.nL..~.o.l.1 .............. in the ...................................................................... Court, was published in said newspaper in the ................. .................................................................................. Affiant further says that the said Delray Beach News-Journal is a newspaper published at Delray Beach, in said Palm Beach County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Palm Beach County, Florida, each week and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Delray Beach, in said Palm Beach County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commi~ion or refund for the purpase of securing this advertisement for publica//on in the sai~ newspaper. .................. 0~ i~£ 9, 1973 BONDED TH:~U I-gED W. D;ESIEHIGRST ASSESSMENT ROLL For opening, grading and paving the North-South sixteen (16) foot alley in Block 1, Rosemont Park subdivision to a width of sixteen (16) feet. ASSESSMENT per front foot $4.714962 PROPERTY FRONT TOTAL DESCRIPTION OWNER FOOTAGE ASS'M. ROSEMONT PARK, BLOCK 1 Lot 1. Jack D. & Mary B. Walker Agree/Deed: Bertram & Elouise Minto 56.1 $ 264.50 Lot 2. Jack D. & Mary B. Walker Agree/Deed: Frank & Vernell Bullard 50 235.75 Lot 3. Jack D. & Mary B. Walker Agree/Deed: Robert & Lillie Johnson 50 235.75 Lot 4. Willie James Spells, Jr. 50 235.75 Lot 5. Council & Phannye Hayes 50 235.75 Lot 9. Margaret N~ite Edwards 50 235.75 Land Contract Agreement: Robert P. & Rita W. Myrick Lot 10. Margaret White Edwards Land Contract Agree: Robert P. & Rita W. Myrick 50 235.75 Lot ll. Joel Newman Construction Co. 50 235.75 Lot 12. Joel Newman Construction Co. 56.1 264.50 Lots 13, 14 & 15. Barbara C. & William H. Parish 156.1 736.00 Lot 16. Margaret Cribbs Ornelas 50 235.75 Lot 17. Willie F. & Doris P. Robinson 50 235.75 Lot 18. Willie F. & Doris ?. Robinson 50 235.75 Lot 19. Otha Lee, Jr. & Viola Wilson 50 235.75 Lot 20. Seacrest, Inc. 50 235.75 Agree/Deed:Charlie & Gemary Odom Lot 21. Seacrest, Inc. Agree/Deed: S.M. & Georgia Ann Anderson 50 235.75 Page 2. ASSESSMENT ROLL Lot 22. Seacrest, Inc. Agree/Deed: Amos W. & Tommie D. Williams 50 235.75 Lot 23. Seacrest, Inc. Agree/Deed: Isom C. & Annie Spivey 50 235.75 Lot 24. Seacrest, Inc. Agree/Deed: Leona King 56.1 264.50 1,224.4 $5,773.00 * Construction Contract (Rowe) $5,180.00 Advertising 75.00 10% for Engineering, Accounting & Collection 518.00 $5,773.00 * *100% to be assessed per Resolution No. 13-71 Proof of Pubhcation VS. Filed in the Office of Clerk of Circuit Court .................................................................................. , Clerk By ............................................................................ , D. C. Complainant's Solicitor. Jim ElliS* Bill RatClifi. $har~ Cliff Poit;' Gino DiMare ~- SYBIL GRIFFIN, BOb Mcin~h, BiB G~. Ben Bra~h ~ 89-- M~Y ~A FAUL 110, ~b Or'u, ~r~ H~ Kay Fr~eric~. SON, 111, ~nt, C~r~ MEMORANDUM Date: January 17, 1972 To: City Clerk From: Finance Director Subject: ~Special Assessment: Alley, Blk 1, Rosemont Park Itemized below are total costs of the Special Assessment Project of opening and paving the alley between S. W. Fourth Avenue and S. W. Fifth Avenue, Blk. 1, Rosemont Park. Rowe Construction Co. $ 5,180.00 Advertising 75.00 Engineering, Accounting & Collection 518.00 $ 5,773.00 DELRaY ~EACH~ FLORIDA 33444 February 10, 1972 Mr. J. Eldon Mariott City Manager City Hall Delray Beach, Florida 33444 .Dear Mr. Mariott: This office has been retained by Seacrest, Inc., a Florida corporation, having its principal office in Delray Beach, regarding certain assessments which, I understand, are to be approved at the Council meeting on Monday, February 14. We have carefully reviewed the preliminary proceedings and the purpose of this letter is to place the City on notice that in the event Seacrest, Inc. iz ever assessed for this lien it will not consider the lien enforceable and will resist any efforts the City might make to foreclose its lien. To understand the corporation's reason, it might be helpful to set forth the following brief history: Seacrest built five homes in Rosemont Park, Block 1 and contracted to sell the properties by entering into Agreements for Deed with the purchasers. Each of these Agreements was recorded and in each was a statement to the effect that the buyer under the Agreement for Deed was expressly prohibited from doing any- thing which would create a lien against the real property without the written permission of Seacrest, Inc. This form of conveyance is quite common and the buyer under such an agreement does not acquire title until full payment under the Agreement. It is essentially a land contract which gives the recipient an equitable but no legal interest in the property. True, the recipient can qualify for home- stead exemption, but this is under a special provision of the Florida tax laws. tie is unable to mortgage the property and cannot assign his interest without the consent of the owner. Mr. J. Eldon Mariott February 18, 1972 Page two It~is the corporation's opinion that the City should not have accepted the signatures of these purchasers under the Agreements for Deed on the petition for opening and paving the sixteen-foot alley running north and south between Fourth and Fifth Avenues through Block 1 of Rose~ont Park Subdivision. Seacrest, Inc. would not have signed such a petition because the corporation does not feel that the installation of the alley has benefited the properties. Assuming these five signa- tures to be void, the Petition did not contain the fifty-one (51%) per cent of adjacent property owners necessary to ini- tiate the action. It may be that each of the purchasers under the Agreements will in fact pay all of the monies due over ~he.years and will acquire title. 'It may also be that at that time your liens will be enforceable against the owners, but in the event Seacrest, Inc. is forced to take over aDy of these homes, the corporation will not assume the liability for these liens since the improvements were not J.nitiated by the legal owners. I trust that you will understand our position. Yours very t~uly, ,-n I d ,:? .. cc: Mayor City Council