Loading...
HPB 11-17-04 ge, AGENDA .. P HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING 4,4y vi•� CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: November 17, 2004 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: City Commission Chambers Time: 6:00 P.M. The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Randolph at 243-7127(voice),or 243-7199(TDD), 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing,such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need .-to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Two or more City Commissioners may be in attendance. I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES O August 18, 2004 , O September 1, 2004 O September 15, 2004 I. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Dell Park Historic District Consideration of the proposed Dell Park Historic District. IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. 332 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District, Robert J. Miller, Owner Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with the installation of a 200 square foot shed at the rear of the property. B. 335 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District, Maura Dersh, Agent Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with the construction of a 487square foot addition to the existing noncontributing dwelling. V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS O Public Comments O Reports from Historic District Representatives O Board Members O Staff 1(I. ADJOURN r / Robert G.Tefft, Senior Planner POSTED ON: November 12,2004 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA MEETING DATE: November 17, 2004 LOCATION: FIRST FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Francisco Perez-Azua, Jeffrey Silberstein, Linda Lake, John Miller, Jr., Randee Schatz, Maura Dersh, and Michelle Reich MEMBERS ABSENT: Randee Schatz arrived late STAFF PRESENT: Robert Tefft, Warren Adams, Jeffrey Costello, Brian Shutt and Denise Valek I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Perez at 6:00 p.m. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. No one from the Public addressed the Board on non-agenda items. Chairman Perez read a summary of the Quasi-Judicial Hearing procedures. The Notary swore in individuals for testimony. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Mr. Silberstein, seconded by Ms. Dersh, and passed 6 to 0 to approve the Minutes of August 18, 2004 as written. It was moved by Mr. Silberstein, seconded by Ms. Dersh, and passed 6 to 0 to approve the Minutes of September 1, 2004 as written. It was moved by Mr. Silberstein, seconded by Ms. Dersh, and passed 7 to 0 to approve the Minutes of September 15, 2004 as written. III. PUBLIC HEARING A. Dell Park Historic District Item Before the Board: Consideration of the proposed Dell Park Historic District. Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. Mr. Perez advised he received a call but did not speak with the individual. Historic Preservation Board Minutes November 17, 2004 Mr. Tefft advised the Board is forwarding a recommendation to the City Commission regarding the proposed Dell Park historic district. The City of Delray Beach has proposed to designate the area discussed in the attached designation report to the Local Register of Historic Places. At its meeting of August 18, 2004, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) conducted a formal review of the designation report for the proposed Dell Park Historic District and set a public hearing date on the designation for October 6, 2004. The Planning and Zoning staff was scheduled to meet with the Dell Park Homeowner's Association on September 13, 2004, to discuss the impacts of a historic designation on their neighborhood; however due to Hurricane Frances, the homeowner's association meeting was postponed until October 13, 2004. Therefore, at its meeting of September 15, 2004, the HPB approved the rescheduling of the public hearing date for the Dell Park Historic District designation to October 20, 2004. To qualify as a historic site or historic district, the property or properties must fulfill one or more of the criteria set forth in LDR Section 4.5.1(B) (2) and/or (3). The designation report contains, at minimum, sufficient information to meet the criteria stated in LDR Section 4.5.1(B) (3), which states a district is deemed to have architectural or aesthetic significance if it fulfills one or more of the following criteria: (a) Portrays the environment in an era of history characterized by one or more distinctive architectural styles; (b) Embodies those distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, period, or method of construction; (c) Is a historic or outstanding work of a prominent architect, designer, landscape architect, or builder; or (d) Contains elements of design, detail, material, or craftsmanship of outstanding quality or which represented, in its time, a significant innovation or adaptation to the South Florida environment. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. Mr. Scott Christensen, President of the Seacrest Neighborhood Association, advised he was at the meeting representing himself, our Association as well as fifty-seven (57) property owners who responded to our neighborhood survey addressing the historic designation of a portion of the Seacrest neighborhood. He gave a copy of an overhead of the district to the Board members for review. At the October 20, 2004 meeting they expressed that the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) wanted to know why the neighbors did not want the historic designation for the neighborhood. On October 13, 2004 the City staff made public presentations to the residents. Questions were asked and discussion followed. As the City staff did not directly poll the Dell Park neighborhood to determine interest, residents undertook a direct citizen initiated survey of the neighborhood. We did distribute a survey form and the results are reflected in the map (copies are being made) with one property owner indicating that he was in favor of the historic district as indicated in green, and 56 property owners opposed as indicated in red. Our Association prides itself in involving as many people as possible in the process, and we believe firmly in the majority rules premise. A prime example of this would be how the neighborhood's success with the 2 Historic Preservation Board Minutes November 17, 2004 Seacrest Dell Ida Neighborhood Plan which the City spent about $3.8 million dollars on. Additionally, in addressing the staff report, and the historic designation, the Dell Park neighborhood does not meet HPB requirements of a minimum of 50% and preferably 70% concentration of contributing historic structures to qualify as being a significant area. In 1999 Janus Research prepared a 107 page historical resources report. Ms. Mary Lou Jamison advised she had never seen this report. The City and the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) paid for a historic report of our neighborhood and the Osceola Park neighborhood. The City and the CRA determined that 55 of the 218 properties in our district only 30% would be contributing historic structures. Somehow when the map was prepared for the staff report twenty-two (22) additional structures were added as contributing and one (1) was deleted from this report. How this was arrived at I am unable to determine. There is a significant shortfall of contributing structures to qualify the area as being significant. The map on the bottom is the one from the Janus Report. The map on top show the additional structures added to the 2004 staff report. Mr. Tefft advised that currently there are 98 structures in the staff report indicating significance, and in the e-mail sent to me it said eighty-eight (88) structures are contributing. Eighty- eight (88) out of two hundred eighteen (218) is 40% of the district, which is less than the State guidelines. In summary, if the HPB is looking for an explanation as to why the people feel the way they do, and voted the way they have that is something that the HPB should be addressing outside of this consideration. I believe it would be beneficial to establish the process to accomplish this. It is quite obvious that the information provided to the Dell Park neighborhood did not establish a compelling reason for historic designation. I am here representing fifty-seven (57) surveyed respondents who indicated they wanted me to speak on their behalf, and they voted one (1) for historic designation and fifty-six (56) against. This is 98.25% against. You as members of the Historic Preservation Board need to deny establishment of the Dell Park Historic District by finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and a desire of the property owners of the neighborhood. We have spent a considerable amount of time discussing this and before the last meeting and incorporating as many people as we could in the discussion. Mr. Brad Winney, 1515 North Swinton Avenue, these are specific examples as to why we were opposed to the historic designation. I mentioned it was hard to come up with reasons; however, I did some research on line. If you search on Goggle by the phrase "the economic impacts of historic preservation" several surveys come up. They all point to an improvement in the property values. My personal issue is not setting it up as a preservation area, but more about the manner that it is done. New Jersey confirmed that it was a good idea. However, one of the phrases that caught my attention was the following "the classic examples where designation may diminish value one is where an unimprovement is designated or restricted controls. General maintenance codes in which these Boards are set-up and how they manage the areas. Permission for a two-car driveway. At the last meeting I saw someone go through the process to get permission for a two-car driveway instead of a one-car driveway. I think it is a good idea to stop building mansions on zero lot lines, however, I do not want to go through that type of process, as there is too much minutia. Mr. Frank Hunter, advised he has a lot of friends in the neighborhood, and he is concerned about what the Board is voting. The Board is to vote on a 3 Historic Preservation Board Minutes November 17, 2004 recommendation for approval that it meets the criteria. My agenda is to make sure that this is done right. This week I attempted to get copies of minutes, the consultant report and mailing lists. I understood that there was a City Commission Workshop last Tuesday. Items I do have show that this does not meet the criteria for a historic district. The Board doesn't understand what the people want and the City has not given us the difference between restrictions, guidelines, and criteria of what is allowed and what is not allowed. I hope you vote against this designation. Ms. Thuy Shutt, 102 NE 12th Street, a resident for two years. I want to make a clarification as to what this designation means and what it can preserve. This is not a Land Use Development Regulation; it provides a different layer for a chance to speak on behalf of you as a property owner on aesthetic issues. I do not think that having this designation would prevent someone building out to the maximum development level or that lot, nor does it prevent a historic building from being torn down. Residents like me who adore small quaint homes voluntarily agree to a lot of the historic guidelines. I have no problem with going through the process, and I find staff very good at this. The property owners have to go through staff and pay $50 or $100 to get a permit. I think what you are hearing is that they are opposed because they may have a weekend where they can put a fence up. With the designation it is a little different. I am going along with my neighbors in that I think it should be voluntary. Overall 60% of the property is not contributing, and they will not receive any type of rebate. If the City or the Board chooses to limit the development rights or have that additional review there are other ways in which you can do it. Please consider what you have heard today. Ms. Debra Dowd, 7 NE 66th Court, advised several years ago in the early 90's the Seacrest Association was developed. It was developed out of a study from the City that various City members belonged to. The Seacrest Association was developed through the help of the City. In the early 90's when they developed the plan, part of the plan was to bring Second Avenue down by the Post Office was designated historical was to move up to Seacrest and the Del Ida Neighborhood. The study was not done until 1999 (seven years after). Presently we have neighbors who live in an area where the values have gone up tremendously. When we initially brought this study to the City, much of the area was blighted. The turnover happened without it being historically designated, but happened because of the southern area being designated and the redevelopment of Swinton Avenue. I as a City activist and Board member for many years have always listened to the people in the neighborhood. The neighborhood people at this time and the people are not for this designation for many reasons. For not being educated regarding the process and the benefits. Property values, insurance, things that you may not agree with, but the homeowners do. I don't think this is the time to designate the neighborhood. I would love to see Swinton Avenue designated historic, however, I say listen to the people in the neighborhood. Ms. Pam Reeder, advised it was her understanding that the U.S. Supreme Court may have adjudicated on this particular issue of having local volunteer Boards come in and enact these types of historic designations. I would strongly suggest that the Board look into whether the Supreme Court has adjudicated on this issue, and if not they will be because the Florida Association of Architects is going to request that 4 Historic Preservation Board Minutes November 17, 2004 they make a determination on the constitutionality on these types of Boards throughout the United States. Chairman Perez asked staff for their comments. Mr. Jeffrey Costello, Assistant Planning Director, regarding the comments that have been made we did have the study available, however, we will provide that individual with a copy of the survey. Regarding the concerns based on the study and the Janus study there is not overwhelming support that we have had with other situations. However, there may be other avenues that can be taken, such as a conservation district, which is not like a historic district. It is similar to what is being recommended for the Osceola Park neighborhood where there are historic homes. We are trying to preserve the historic inventory that we have now. This is not something that relates to mansionization, it does give a merit of review that could severely limit something like that occurring. This would give us the ability to get the individual to purchase this property or move it to another site. There are other avenues available to control the redevelopment in the area that would be out of character to the area. We have found that new construction in the area have gone through the guidelines and have preserved the character of the neighborhood. The guidelines proposed for the beach district went before the P & Z Board on Monday night and there was some opposition. It will go to City Commission for a vote. Once you get beyond a certain threshold you will need to go to the Site Plan and Review Board (SPRAB) for approval. We are proposing the change the lot coverage, additional setbacks, and increase the open space requirements. Mr. Scott Christensen advised when our Neighborhood Plan was approved in 1997 addressed this as a Seacrest Neighborhood Association area. Mr. Costello is right, we do not have support for this in any way, shape, or form in our neighborhood. The insurance is not the issue. There is significant nonsupport for this right now. We are looking at the Beach Overlay District. I have spoken to some of the Commissioners, and they are looking at this as a template for the neighborhood associations. If we decide to do that it will give the same benefit to all of the homeowners. We could incorporate our entire neighborhood from George Bush to the northern part of the City to the railroad tracks. This better accomplishes the goals of the neighborhood. This would accomplish the goals of the whole neighborhood. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing, and asked if there were any comments from the Board. Ms. Lake asked Mr. Tefft how many times have you visited with the neighborhood and given them information regarding the guidelines. Staff met with residents from both of the proposed Districts on August 18, 2004. We had another meeting with the Dell Park Association on October 13, 2004. Ms. Lake inquired how many individuals attended those meetings. Mr. Tefft advised that he could not be specific about attendance at the Dell Park meeting. 5 Historic Preservation Board Minutes November 17, 2004 Mr. Christensen advised about 70 homeowners from the Dell Park area attended the meeting. Ms. Lake advised she is amazed at the negative response to a historic designation, and felt we should have another workshop for the homeowners to educate them about what a historic area is. Mr. Silberstein felt that lots 3, 5, 7, 10 and 11 should be designated as a historic district. They are contributing more so than other homes east of Seacrest. I believe that that neighborhood is worthy of a historic district. Delray is Swinton Avenue and we should not lose sight of that. Ms. Schatz agreed with Mr. Silberstein. Our job sitting on the Board is to make a recommendation. I agree that this map is not one that I would be in favor of. We only make a recommendation to the City Commission. I agree that there is a basis for suggesting part of this property for designation, but not in its entirety. Ms. Reich agreed and advised she would like to see Swinton Avenue preserved. Mr. Miller advised that quite possibly a Conservation District could be a little more palatable. The map is obviously not correct, as there are some homes that have nothing to do with this area. Ms. Dersh had concerns that some people don't understand they cannot do changes without a permit from the Building Department. It is easier to go to the Historic Board. I agree with Mr. Silberstein that there are a lot more homes between Swinton and Seacrest that should be protected. Chairman Perez advised we are here to make a recommendation to City Commission. I am concerned about recommending something that the homeowners are totally opposed to. Ms. Schatz advised in looking at the map that was handed out, there were several homeowners who were not involved in the voting process. There was only a select group that was polled. Mr. Christensen advised that there are several duplexes owned by out of state owners. General discussion with the Board members continued. It was moved by Mr. Silberstein, seconded by Ms. Reich, and passed 6 to 1 to move a recommendation of approval to the City Commission to establish the following lots in the Historic District: Lots 2, 3, 6, 7, 10 and 11 bounded by Swinton Avenue on the west. Seacrest Boulevard on the east, and George Bush Boulevard on the south. 6 Historic Preservation Board Minutes November 17, 2004 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. 332 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District, Robert J. Miller, Owner Item Before the Board: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with the installation of a 200 square foot shed at the rear of the property. Mr. Adams entered a copy of the project file into the record. The subject property is located on the west side of SE 7th Avenue, between SE 4th Street and SE 3rd Street, and is zoned R-1-AA (Single Family Residential). The property contains an existing single family residence that was built in the Ranch style in 1962. The structure is of CBS. construction with a slab foundation, and is considered a non-contributing building within the Marina Historic District. Over the years a number of repairs and alterations have been made to the site. In June 1989, a COA was submitted for the erection of a 6' high timber stockade fence along the north, south and part of the east boundaries of the property to match the pre-existing fence along the west boundary. This application was later amended to include roof repairs to the property through the removal of the existing white cement roofing tiles and their replacement with an identical tile, and the repair of the flat deck with tar and gravel. Subsequently, staff approved the changes. A more significant COA application was submitted in May 1996 for the enclosure of the car port under the north gable for use as a room and the installation of a decorative balustrade across the front porch roof between the two gables. In June, 1996, the Board approved the alterations and a recent inspection confirmed that the car port has been enclosed but the balustrade has not been constructed. The current proposal is for the construction of a wooden framed storage shed in the rear yard of the property 13' to the north of the south boundary fence. The shed will measure 20' long by 10' wide and approximately 8.5' in height to the mean of the hipped roof. The frame will be faced with vertically fixed timber board cladding which is to be painted white, and the roof will be covered with tin which will also be white in color. There is to be a timber French door with six glazed panels to the front (north) elevation of the shed facing the pool, and access will also be gained to the rear of the structure by a 6 over 6 panel solid timber door. The fenestration will include 2 small windows to the rear and one side of the structure and the applicant has stated that there will also be two small windows to the front fagade at either side of the door. Staff is recommending approval. Chairman Perez asked if there were any comments from the public. There were none. The applicant was not present. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing, and asked if there were any comments from the Board. Ms. Dersh drove by the house and advised you would not be able to see the shed from the street. 7 Historic Preservation Board Minutes November 17, 2004 Mr. Silberstein advised he also drove past the house and saw a wood fence. He asked Mr. Adams how high the fence was. Mr. Adams advised it was 6' high. The structure would be 8.5' to the mean and the door will be 6' high. Mr. Silberstein's concern is that when this goes to the Building Department will Mr. Adams make sure that the mean is going to be 8.5'. Mr. Adams advised he will. Mr. Adams advised the building would be white with a tin roof, and it is set back 99' from the road. It was moved by Ms. Schatz, seconded by Mr. Miller, and approved 6 to 1 to move approval of the COA for 332 SE 7th Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(J)(5) and 4.5.1 of the Land Development Regulations. B. 335 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District, Maura Dersh, Agent. Ms. Dersh stepped down. Item Before the Board: Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with the construction of a 487 square foot addition to the existing noncontributing dwelling. Mr. Tefft entered a copy of the project file into the record. Add from staff report. The subject property consists of Parcel C, Riekse Replat, and is zoned R-1-AA (Single-Family Residential). The property is located on the east side of SE 7th Avenue, approximately 70' north of SE 4th Street within the Marina Historic District. On November 13, 1990, the City Commission approved the Riekse Replat, which subdivided two (2) lots into three (3) lots. The applicant is proposing to construct an approximately 487 square foot addition for the dwelling. A 37 square foot addition housing a spiral staircase will be constructed on the north side of the existing covered entry. The new staircase will lead to a proposed 450 square foot second floor bedroom/bathroom addition. The proposal also includes a modification of the north roof line to accommodate an extension of the second floor terrace (280 square feet). Staff is recommending approval. Chairman Perez asked if there were any comments from the public. There were none. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing, and asked if there were any comments from the Board. There were none. It was moved by Ms. Schatz, seconded by Mr. Miller, and passed 6 to 0 to move approval of the COA for 335 SE 7th Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(J) (5) and 4.5.1 of the Land Development Regulations. 8 Historic Preservation Board Minutes November 17, 2004 V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments: Mr. Frank Hunter advised when he made his comments earlier he was speaking about the process. This process has been going on since August 16, 2004 when I met Ms. Shay. She advised me that a consultant's report had been done, and she advised I attend the Board meetings. I have done so ever since. It was not my intent to single out Mr. Adams. He has been very helpful and polite, nor did I bring any intent on Denise. I commend the Board and staff for their dedication. Chairman Perez asked if there were any comments from the Board. Mr. Miller had hoped that the public were more aware of this designation. Ms. Lake advised historically the designation works. It is a positive designation for the area. All the areas that have been designated are very successful. Mr. Silberstein advised we need the right direction in order to protect Swinton Avenue. Ms. Dersh advised that anyone who wishes to become a member of a Board can go to City Hall and volunteer. Mr. Scott Christensen advised that the overlay of the beach area would be guidelines, it is adapting it to the neighborhood. It would be adapted to the neighborhood. Mr. Costello advised the decision tonight was a good evaluation and compromise. The inventory is much greater between Swinton and Seacrest. As far as the concerns regarding the district, at the staff level we look at approved COA's and whether or not we can streamline the process. In 2003 we amended the Design Guidelines and looked at staff approving COA's. We may take a look at colors that is something you do not need a permit for. You can always change your paint color. Commercial properties and multi-family come before the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board and the Historic Preservation Board. We are going to look at that so it is not perceived to be such an issue. Chairman Perez agreed with Mr. Costello. B. Report from Historic District Representatives: None C. Board Members: Mr. Miller advised we needed community support for this new designation. Ms. Lake advised historically speaking the designation works. Mr. Silberstein feels that we made the right decision regarding the designation. 9 Historic Preservation Board Minutes November 17, 2004 Chairman Perez advised this will go to the City Commission and they will make the right decision. Ms. Dersh advised that this Board is an all-volunteer one and anyone can go to the City and apply for membership on a Board. Mr. Christensen advised that the Beach Overlay that they are talking about would be guidelines. It is not accepting it as written. Heights might be different, we can use it as a template. D. Staff: Mr. Costello advised the Board's decision was a good compromise. Regarding the boundaries of the District, based on the map the inventory is greater between Swinton and Seacrest. At the staff level we will look at the staff approved COA's items we review and whether or not we can do modifications. Last year we did amend the Design Guidelines. We may take a look at colors. The commercial districts have to go before SPRAB or HPB. VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Board made a motion to adjourn at 7:45 p.m. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for November 17, 2004, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on // c_S. k Den e A. Valek If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. 10 DEERAYBEACH DEFRAY BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD IDI MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT= liii 1993 1993 Project Name: Dell Park Historic District Project Location: Generally Described as the Area Between North Swinton Avenue and NE 3rd Avenue, Between George Bush Boulevard (NE 8th Street) and the North Side of NE 13th Street. , a ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is the forwarding of a recommendation to the City Commission regarding the proposed Dell Park Historic District, pursuant to Land Development Regulations (LDR) Section 4.5.1(C). BACKGROUND The City of Delray Beach has proposed to designate the area discussed in the attached designation report to the Local Register of Historic Places. At its meeting of August 18, 2004, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) conducted a formal review of the designation report for the proposed Dell Park Historic District and set a public hearing date on the designation for October 6, 2004. The Planning and Zoning staff was scheduled to meet with the Dell Park Homeowner's Association on September 13, 2004, to discuss the impacts of a historic designation on their neighborhood; however due to Hurricane Frances, the homeowner's association meeting was postponed until October 13, 2004. Therefore, at its meeting of September 15, 2004, the HPB approved the rescheduling of the public hearing date for the Dell Park Historic District designation to October 20, 2004. At its meeting of October 20, 2004, the Board held a public hearing in conjunction with review of the historic district designation request. While some members of the public spoke in favor of the proposed historic district designation, others spoke against the designation citing concerns over homeowner's insurance availability and costs and the means by which modifications to structures are processed. The President of the Seacrest Neighborhood Association presented a petition with 35 signatures of property owners in the proposed designation area that were opposed to the request. The Board had concerns over the lack of a clear argument by those in opposition as to why the designation should not be supported. The Board felt that those in opposition may need more time to obtain facts that would support denial of the designation. Accordingly, the Board voted unanimously (7-0) to postpone action on the designation request until the Board's meeting of November 17, 2004. ANALYSIS. To qualify as a historic site or historic district, the property or properties must fulfill one or more of the criteria set forth in LDR Section 4.5.1(B) (2) and/or (3). The designation report contains, at minimum, sufficient information to meet the criteria stated in LDR Section 4.5.1(B) (3), which states a district is deemed to have architectural or aesthetic significance if it fulfills one or more of the following criteria: (a) Portrays the environment in an era of history characterized by one or more distinctive architectural styles; (b) Embodies those distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, period, or method of construction; Meeting Date: November 17,2004 Agenda Item: III.A. Historic Preservation Board Memorandum Staff Report Dell Park Historic District Page 2 (c) Is a historic or outstanding work of a prominent architect, designer, landscape architect, or builder; or (d) Contains elements of design, detail, material, or craftsmanship of outstanding quality or which represented, in its time, a significant innovation or adaptation to the South Florida environment. Further, pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(C), to qualify as a historic site, or historic district, or historic interior, individual properties, structures, sites, or buildings, or groups of properties, structures, sites, or buildings must have significant character, interest, or value as part of the historical, cultural, aesthetic, and architectural heritage of the city, state, or nation. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: A review of the Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan was conducted and the following is noted: Future Land Use Element Policy A-4.2: In order to protect the City's historic resources, the Land Development Regulations shall include provisions for designation of historically significant buildings, structures, archaeological sites, or districts. The City shall conduct periodic neighborhood surveys to identify and evaluate potential historic resources. Housing Element Objective A-10: The City shall support the conservation and rehabilitation of historically significant housing, especially where such housing is an identifying characteristic of a particular neighborhood. Housing Element Policy A-10.2: The City will promote the use of historic designations as a revitalization tool in its preparation of Neighborhood Plans for those areas which have a significant inventory of historic structures. Housing Element Policy A-12.4: The City will provide planning and technical assistance to implement neighborhood-supported initiatives aimed at preserving the character of existing residential areas. Such assistance may involve the formulation of regulations that would limit the size and scale of new homes to be consistent with existing structures within a defined neighborhood, and analysis of the housing inventory to determine if the area qualifies for designation as a historic district, and similar measures. The attached designation report demonstrates at minimum that the area qualifies as a historic district as the area: (a) portrays high styles and local interpretations of distinctive architectural styles; and (b) embodies distinctive characteristics typical of those styles and period of construction. The predominant architectural styles include Mission Revival, Masonry Vernacular, Minimal Traditional, Frame Vernacular and Mediterranean Revival, and the period of significance for the area is between 1922 and 1954. Additionally, it was the recommendation of the Seacrest/ Del-Ida Neighborhood Plan that a historic evaluation of the buildings in this area be conducted and that if the results of the study indicate that it is warranted, that the Dell Park subdivision be designated as a historic district. The evaluation was conducted in 1999 and indicated that 70 of the 240 properties in Dell Park contained historically contributing structures. A subsequent survey by staff conducted in association the designation proposal concluded that 98 of the 240 properties contained historically contributing structures. Designating the district as historic will help revitalize the neighborhood, preserve the character of the extant historic dwellings and promote the retention of the scale of the neighborhood, which is consistent with the above referenced Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan as well as the Seacrest/ Del-Ida Neighborhood Plan. Historic Preservation Board Memorandum Staff Report Dell Park Historic District Page 3 OTHER ITEMS: Insurance: At the Board's meeting of October 20, 2004, concerns were put forth regarding the impact of the proposed historic district designation on homeowner's insurance costs and availability as well as the boundaries of the proposed historic district. While this was addressed by staff at the meeting, it is again noted that there appears to be no link between the designation of a property as historic (either individually or as part of a district) and an increase in insurance rates or availability of coverage. The age of dwellings is a factor in underwriting for some insurance companies regardless of whether a property is located within a historic district or not. The only point at which rates would appear to significantly increase is when a homeowner requests a level of coverage to facilitate the rebuilding of a dwelling using historically accurate materials. It is noted that the City of Delray Beach does not require that a property located within a historic district or an individually designated property be reconstructed in such a manner should it be destroyed. Historic Inventory: The Florida Division of Historical Resources Guidelines for use by Historic Preservation Professionals states the following: O For a historic district, look at the density of older buildings. If at least 70 percent of the lots have historic buildings on them, the area may comprise a district. O For the recording of sites, buildings, structures, objects, and districts, historic is defined as 50 years of age or older. O [Significance] criteria are subject to very broad interpretation, and were purposefully designed to allow the development of specific guidelines on a local basis. The building stock within the proposed Dell Park Historic District consists of 40.8% contributing structures and 46.6% historic structures. However, as noted above, the percentages are merely guidelines to be used in identifying potential historic districts and open to interpretation on a local level. The proposed historic district does have a significant number of contributing and historic properties, and as discussed previously, the designation report demonstrates at minimum that the area meets the locally established criteria for designation as a historic district. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 2 , A. Continue with direction. B. Move a recommendation of approval to the City Commission to establish the Dell Park Historic District, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff and designation reports, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Sections 4.5.1(B) (3) and 4.5.1(C) of the Land Development Regulations. C. Deny the establishment of the Dell Park Historic District, by a finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Sections 4.5.1(B) (3) and 4.5.1(C) of the Land Development Regulations. RECOMMENDATION Move a recommendation of approval to the City Commission to establish the Dell Park Historic District, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Sections 4.5.1(B) (3) and 4.5.1(C) of the Land Development Regulations. Attachment:Dell Park Historic District Designation Report Memorandum Staff Report Prepared by:Robert G. Tefft,Senior Planner Dell Park Historic District Designation Report Prepared by:Wendy Shay,Historic Preservation Planner Dell Park Historic District Designation Report 44 .. ,, y - �: : f !ii r 41 . 0,,, ., ;. t&„„ , os .. ;'4 H £r t 7;> r *ZS 's x t .... ,, t¢t ' die.• ik"alg City of Delray Beach October 2004 • I. Statement of Purpose Dell Park Historic District The proposal to establish the Dell Park Neighborhood as a designated historic district was city initiated and began in June 2004 as a direct result of the recommendations noted in the Seacrest-Del-Ida Neighborhood Plan dated March 3, 1998. The boundaries • were chosen based upon the plat boundaries established for Dell Park in 1922. The district was chosen for designation based upon its high architectural integrity and • diversity of architectural styles as well as its contiguous expanse of extant contributing historic buildings and structures. II. Location Map & Boundary Description The proposed Dell Park Historic District encompasses the east side of North Swinton Avenue to the west and NE 3rd Avenue to the east; the north side of NE 8th Street to.the south and the north side of NE 13th Street to the north (see attached map). o HEATHER LANE1 ^�i�1 4I I I 1 ' NE.1.IH ST.(LAKE AVE) . JN. E. 14TH ST. HIGH AND ]1fl4U� 13THY ST.»IH.W.12111 ST )... ...g r. ... R . 1 1 mil.II_1. — ^_:s. .. ",: ,A.,N.E.— 12TH ST. i::: <sviratirk:tf„, ,w-,,,f1 _ .. N.w.nIHST.■ N.E. ,a 11TH...�+ss ST.�— n ..— a .,. mZ p'.ff fir• .,. --°-1. - I AA . N.E. � ��-.Nr.arN sr.; , t±lt5T :I!I Mill ill �i-m CEOR BUSH■NI-In=■BOULEVARDm� ( ll . IllhiiOI :27/j'( 11 N W.IM it Z -0. w N PROPOSED DELL PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT --011111Nr- .m 1975 10 M OR Of DWI.BEAD..R ���.+� euwwc a za..c urw.tuo.r srw:cr uAwxw rcAN euwr socx a.irN coNrweviw. ..sromc ravmARr --AL/L4L EASE LOP SW.-- N.r atr:uurn Ill. Architectural Significance The period of significance for the area is between 1922 and 1954 based upon recordation of the Dell Park plat and the last of the original houses constructed within the area prior to the influx of infill. Predominant architectural styles include Mission Revival, Masonry Vernacular, Minimal Traditional, Frame Vernacular, and Mediterranean- Revival. The following is a brief description of those styles: Frame Vernacular (1900-1940) - Constructed of wood framing and reflecting no high architectural style or formal architectural design, the vernacular house can be either symmetrical or asymmetrical in design. Built by laymen, often the owner, with no formal construction experience who utilized local I�I�..Iliii.l.11��lNl �Il161_I��__ .1lII I building materials and craftsmanship techniques (also Masonry Vernacular). Mission Revival (1920-1935) - Minimally ornamented with built-up, flat roofs often with a., stepped or curvilinear parapets, a wood or hollow clay tile frame with smooth or rough textured stucco — lI exterior. Tile visor roofs over windows and entryways are also common. Fenestration often includes casement windows and arched entryways. Mediterranean Revival (1915-1940) - Influenced by the Italian and Spanish s 0 —47;/;/�//./h;,., styles and popularized by Henry Flagler �.� "'� and Addison Mizner, this style displays Ji Il"�� e a low pitched, multi-plane roof lines often , with red clay tiles and little or no Mr overhang. Tile visor roofs are also *.;1 �� � P[111 common. A stucco exterior, often textured, 1: covers an asymmetrical, wood or hollow J clay tile frame. Arches are prevalent within the fenestration design including entryways, arcades, and colonnades. Minimal Traditional (1935-c.1950) — Typically, a 1.4 "Iry one-story one-story building displaying a low or intermediate %_;p„ pitched cross-gable roof with a large chimney. ,j,'0 ._i1�11o._ Shares Tudor style traits such as rock or brick °" ��`��' ��� facing (particularlyon the chimney) and minimal °■° M�OA 6 ear, f '.� I r�� wood detailing. Popularized after World War II, a LIII tsV i this style is often associated with tract housing. u1iiiEgi IV. Historical & Cultural Significance The Dell Park plat was recorded in January 1922, submitted by Boyd Hawkins, President and General Manger of the Floridixi Farms Company as part of the 70 acres associated with the Seacrest neighborhood. Dell Park was platted in lots ranging from 24' to 65.5' wide; though the majority were platted at 50' wide lots. The area was originally a pineapple farm. As agriculture made way for the development boom of the 1920s, it is speculated that the land was available for purchase and development of single family homes. This is reflective of the mid-1920s Mission-Revival and Mediterranean influenced homes that can be seen today. According to the Seacrest Neighborhood Plan, only one home was constructed in 1922 but by the end of the decade, 45 homes were constructed throughout the Dell Park subdivision. The plat assigned street names influenced by western U.S. cities that included: Phoenix Path (NE 8 Street), Seattle Street (NE 9 Street), Santa-Fe Trail (NE 10 Street), Denver Drive (NE 11 Street), Salt Lake Way (NE 12 Street), Cheyenne Road (NE 13 Street), Boise Boulevard (NE 2 Avenue) and Sacramento Pass (NE 3 Avenue). At the time the plat was recorded, NE.2 Avenue, also known today as Seacrest Boulevard, ended at NE 13th Street with only pine scrub beyond.and did not expand further north towards Boynton Beach until after World War II. One of the first houses in Dell Park was constructed on NE 9th Street east of NE 2nd Avenue according to an oral interview of Margaret Manning (who originally owned 222 NE 9th Street), conducted by Dorothy Patterson, city archivist. The streets were lined with Coconut Palms at that time and NE 2nd Avenue was only a shell rock road. One prominent local family who settled in the area at this time was the O'Neal family who resided in Delray Beach since c. 1918. Samuel Elliot (S. E.) O'Neal was the eldest of four brothers who moved to Delray Beach from Fairfax County, South Carolina. The O'Neal brothers were produce farmers west of Delray for a number of years and gradually moved to town as the farm prospered. S. E. O'Neal married Shirley Bradley in 1921. They purchased 910 N. E. 2nd Avenue from Herbert Harrington on May 21, 1930. S. E. and Shirley O'Neal had one son, Bradley O'Neal. Bradley was the first Delray Beach resident to die in the armed forces in World War II. The local VFW Post is named in his honor who was killed during the Italian campaign in 1942. Bradley bequeathed one-half of his serviceman's life insurance policy, in the amount of $5,000, to the Delray Beach School Library. T. M. O'Neal, the next eldest brother, was listed in the 1920 Palm Beach County directory as a garage owner in the town of Delray Beach. He later entered the insurance business and maintained an office above Huber's Drugstore, a city landmark. T. M. O'Neal was elected to the Delray Beach City Council for a two year term starting in 1925. He later became a Palm Beach County Commissioner. Fred A. O'Neal became a lawyer. The Delray Beach Historical Society has a file of stock certificates and patents indicating he invested in several local businesses (Frysinger-Brigante). The area developed slowly but steadily in the 1930s with the transition from more detailed Mediterranean inspired homes to Frame Vernacular and Masonry Vernacular dwellings. Clapboard clad houses with cross gable and hip roof are still prevalent between North Swinton Avenue and NE 2 Avenue. Most of the houses were constructed with rear cottages which served as temporary housing while the larger, main dwellings were being constructed. These cottages later served as rental housing for servicemen during World War II. Post World War II, the area experienced a construction boom in order to accommodate returning GIs. Masonry Vernacular and Minimal Traditional style construction prospered with more readily available manufactured materials and labor. According to Sandy Simon, Delray Beach historian, low cost housing was prevalent in this area and as construction expanded so too did the area's residential neighborhoods to the north towards the Delray-Boynton border. Local directories from 1953 clearly show both permanent residents and tourists in this area who rented the houses seasonally. The majority of the remainder of the neighborhood's building stock was constructed during the 1950s and 1960s including numerous Ranch style houses. These houses are considered non-contributing due to either age or lack of architectural integrity. V. Statement of Significance Pursuant to the LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(3), a district is deemed to have architectural or aesthetic significance if it fulfills one or more of the following criteria: (a) Portrays the environment in an era of history characterized by one or more distinctive architectural styles;and, (b) Embodies those distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, period, or method of construction; (c) Is a historic or outstanding work of a prominent architect, designer, landscape architect, or builder; or (d) Contains elements of design, detail, material, or craftsmanship of outstanding quality or which represented, in its time, a significant innovation or adaptation to the South Florida environment. To qualify as a historic site, or historic district, or historic interior, individual properties, structures, sites, or buildings, or groups of properties, structures, sites, or buildings must have significant character, interest, or value as part of the historical, cultural, aesthetic, and architectural heritage of the city, state, or nation. The area qualifies as a historic district under the following criterion: (a) portrays high styles and local interpretations of distinctive architectural styles and (b) embodies distinctive characteristics typical of those styles and period of construction. A significant concentration of the Mission Revival, Frame Vernacular, Masonry Vernacular, Mediterranean-Revival, and Minimal Traditional styles of architecture are prevalent within the proposed boundaries and the contributing status of these building is considerable as the majority of the buildings have maintained their architectural integrity. VI. Bibliography and Sources Delray Beach Surveys - Florida Master Site File Forms, 1999 & 2001 Dell Park Plat, January 1922 Sandy Simon, Delray Beach Historian, Phone Interview conducted with Wendy Shay, Delray Beach Preservation Planner, June 2004 Delray Beach Historical Society, Oral Interview with Margaret Manning (222 NE 9`h Street), conducted by Dorothy Patterson, 1990. Miller's Delray Beach, Florida City Directory, Volume III., 1953-1954. Delray Beach Individually Listed Designation Report for 910 NE 2nd Avenue, prepared by Jack Frysinger and Starr Deppe-Brigante, 2002. Seacrest/Del-Ida Park Neighborhood Plan, City of Delray Beach/Delray Beach Community Redevelopment Agency, adopted March 3, 1998. OHRAYBEACH - - - - DFIRAYBEACH ewe HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD N4mica lvi MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT liii 1993 1993 Project Name: Dell Park Historic District Project Location: Generally Described as the Area Between North Swinton Avenue and NE 3rd Avenue, Between George Bush Boulevard (NE 8th Street) and the North Side of NE 13th Street. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is the forwarding of a recommendation to the City Commission regarding the proposed Dell Park Historic District, pursuant to Land Development Regulations (LDR) Section 4.5.1(C). BACKGROUND.. The City of Delray Beach has proposed to designate the area discussed in the attached designation report to the Local Register of Historic Places. At its meeting of August 18, 2004, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) conducted a formal review of the designation report for the proposed Dell Park Historic District and set a public hearing date on the designation for October 6, 2004. The Planning and Zoning staff was scheduled to meet with the Dell Park Homeowner's Association on September 13, 2004, to discuss the impacts of a historic designation on their neighborhood; however due to Hurricane Frances, the homeowner's association meeting was postponed until October 13, 2004. Therefore, at its meeting of September 15, 2004, the HPB approved the rescheduling of the public hearing date for the Dell Park Historic District designation to October 20, 2004. At its meeting of October 20, 2004, the Board held a public hearing in conjunction with review of the historic district designation request. While some members of the public spoke in favor of the proposed historic district designation, others spoke against the designation citing concerns over homeowner's insurance availability and costs and the means by which modifications to structures are processed. The President of the Seacrest Neighborhood Association presented a petition with 35 signatures of property owners in the proposed designation area that were opposed to the request. The Board had concerns over the lack of a clear argument by those in opposition as to why the designation should not be supported. The Board felt that those in opposition may need more time to obtain facts that would support denial of the designation. Accordingly, the Board voted unanimously (7-0) to postpone action on the designation request until the Board's meeting of November 17, 2004. To qualify as a historic site or historic district, the property or properties must fulfill one or more of the criteria set forth in LDR Section 4.5.1(B) (2) and/or (3). The designation report contains, at minimum, sufficient information to meet the criteria stated in LDR Section 4.5.1(B) (3), which states a district is deemed to have architectural or aesthetic significance if it fulfills one or more of the following criteria: (a) Portrays the environment in an era of history characterized by one or more distinctive architectural.styles; (b) Embodies those distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, period, or method of construction; Meeting Date:November 17,2004 Agenda Item: III.A. Historic Preservation Board Memorandum Staff Report Dell Park Historic District Page 2 (c) Is a historic or outstanding work of a prominent architect, designer, landscape architect, or builder; or (d) Contains elements of design, detail, material, or craftsmanship of outstanding quality or which represented, in its time, a significant innovation or adaptation to the South Florida environment. Further, pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(C), to qualify as a historic site, or historic district, or historic interior, individual properties, structures, sites, or buildings, or groups of properties, structures, sites, or buildings must have significant character, interest, or value as part of the historical, cultural, aesthetic, and architectural heritage of the city, state, or nation. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: A review of the Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan was conducted and the following is noted: Future Land Use Element Policy A-4.2: In order to protect the City's historic resources, the Land Development Regulations shall include provisions for designation of historically significant buildings, structures, archaeological sites, or districts. The City shall conduct periodic neighborhood surveys to identify and evaluate potential historic resources. Housing Element Objective A-10: The City shall support the conservation and rehabilitation of historically significant housing, especially where such housing is an identifying characteristic of a particular neighborhood. Housing Element Policy A-10.2: The City will promote the use of historic designations as a revitalization tool in its preparation of Neighborhood Plans for those areas which have a significant inventory of historic structures. Housing Element Policy A-12.4: The City will provide planning and technical assistance to implement neighborhood-supported initiatives aimed at preserving the character of existing residential areas. Such assistance may involve the formulation of regulations that would limit the size and scale of new homes to be consistent with existing structures within a defined neighborhood, and analysis of the housing inventory to determine if the area qualifies for designation as a historic district, and similar measures. The attached designation report demonstrates at minimum that the area qualifies as a historic district as the area: (a) portrays high styles and local interpretations of distinctive architectural styles; and (b) embodies distinctive characteristics typical of those styles and period of construction. The predominant architectural styles include Mission Revival, Masonry Vernacular, Minimal Traditional, Frame Vernacular and Mediterranean Revival, and the period of significance for the area is between 1922 and 1954. Additionally, it was the recommendation of the Seacrest/ Del-Ida Neighborhood Plan that a historic evaluation of the buildings in this area be conducted and that if the results of the study indicate that it is warranted, that the Dell Park subdivision be designated as a historic,district. The evaluation was conducted in 1999 and indicated that 70 of the 240 properties in Dell Park contained historically contributing structures. A subsequent survey by staff conducted in association the designation proposal concluded that 98 of the 240 properties contained historically contributing structures. Designating the district as historic will help revitalize the neighborhood, preserve the character of the extant historic dwellings and promote the retention of the scale of the neighborhood, which is consistent with the above referenced Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan as well as the Seacrest/ Del-Ida Neighborhood Plan. • Historic Preservation Board Memorandum Staff Report Dell Park Historic District Page 3 OTHER ITEMS: Insurance: At the Board's meeting of October 20, 2004, concerns were put forth regarding the impact of the proposed historic district designation on homeowner's insurance costs and availability as well as the boundaries of the proposed historic district. While this was addressed by staff at the meeting, it is again noted that there appears to be no link between the designation of a property as historic (either individually or as part of a district) and an increase in insurance rates or availability of coverage. The age of dwellings is a factor in underwriting for some insurance companies regardless of whether a property is located within a historic district or not. The only point at which rates would appear to significantly increase is when a homeowner requests a level of coverage to facilitate the rebuilding of a dwelling using historically accurate materials. It is noted that the City of Delray Beach does not require that a property located within a historic district or an individually designated property be reconstructed in such a manner should it be destroyed. Historic Inventory: The Florida Division of. Historical Resources Guidelines for use by Historic Preservation Professionals states the following: O For a historic district, look at the density of older buildings. If at least 70 percent of the lots have historic buildings on them, the area may comprise a district. • For the recording of sites, buildings, structures, objects, and districts, historic is defined as 50 years of age or older. O [Significance] criteria are subject to very broad interpretation, and were purposefully designed to allow the development of specific guidelines on a local basis. The building stock within the proposed Dell Park Historic District consists of 40.8% contributing structures and 46.6% historic structures. However, as noted above, the percentages are merely guidelines to be used in identifying potential historic districts and open to interpretation on a local level. The proposed historic district does have a significant number of contributing and historic properties, and as discussed previously, the designation report demonstrates at minimum that the area meets the locally established criteria for designation as a historic district. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move a recommendation of approval to the City Commission to establish the Dell Park Historic District, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff and designation reports, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Sections 4.5.1(B) (3) and 4.5.1(C) of the Land Development Regulations. C. Deny the establishment of the Dell Park Historic District, by a finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Sections 4.5.1(B) (3) and 4.5.1(C) of the Land Development Regulations. RECOMMENDATION Move a recommendation of approval to the City Commission to establish the Dell Park Historic District, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Sections 4.5.1(B) (3) and 4.5.1(C)of the Land Development Regulations. Attachment:Dell Park Historic District Designation Report Memorandum Staff Report Prepared by:Robert G.Tefft,Senior Planner Dell Park Historic District Designation Report Prepared by:Wendy Shay,Historic Preservation Planner e Dell Park Historic District Designation Report ti t-p. /71`; ' '4 �. ' ' > -fi" F.. # ` . { E - d !{S'J Y jT , ' ) ,zb v c :. _ ice -*As. =�r `'r s�: .. - - ph7� t a.,,�§ r s r"' `¢ * ♦ '—';;I:,*''. fit • .r P`6; .d's'•. City of Delray Beach October 2004 I. Statement of Purpose Dell Park Historic District The proposal to establish the Dell Park Neighborhood as a designated historic district was city initiated and began in June 2004 as a direct result of the recommendations noted in the Seacrest-Del-Ida Neighborhood Plan dated March 3, 1998. The boundaries were chosen based upon the plat boundaries established for Dell Park in 1922. The district was chosen for designation based upon its high architectural integrity and diversity of architectural styles as well as its contiguous expanse of extant contributing historic buildings and structures. • II. Location Map & Boundary Description The proposed Dell Park Historic District encompasses the east side of North Swinton Avenue to the west and NE 3rd Avenue to the east; the north side of NE 8th Street to-the south and the north side of NE 13th Street.to the north (see attached map). • f 4 J , _ J. I o HEA TTHER LANE o lift i a 4I I I 2 N.C.11M ST.(LW1E AVE) JN. E. 14TH ST. HIGHLFN � \ - �w�Y r}1.. _3 N.E. 13TH ST.,r _ "` :'-s Fe"- -.9. y., I _ ,,, / N.W.12TH ST! f�%c yy��� {� _ 0,477,.. i N.E,. 0 mJe . .Ff..1m " / 4111118111114 A ''' " - '1 ° N_w.11TH ST.I N.E. 111H Sr. / - 1— - N.E. IOTH N T - . : , :,2 ..„2 l�- Ala .�— 1 / cn • _I...m a _ dr z.. ....f _ • / N.E. �yy_ 97H SM .N.V.9TH ST., f` 1- u. , g aim ini ip - Hw.eTH sr.im :=CEO' BUSH■----•■60ULEVARDIN 1l • N11111 mr. QP��°� II • .1111111.2 �° II CP'� II N.E. 71H ST. O //7i' II N PROPOSED DELL PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT • —MI! rm 1975 10 EMI O1Y OF DOMT 1...R EMI PIANWGt IOrc pfl'•MILpr z1PFErraAnEp YFM suAT DaOCN,A..eEq DDetrWOUrYG wsrCwDBOV,OaaY --aura ease uw Hnrur-- - uw ur:Ila1R Ill. Architectural Significance The period of significance for the area is between 1922 and 1954 based upon recordation of the Dell Park plat and the last of the original houses constructed within the area prior to the influx of infill. Predominant architectural styles include Mission Revival, Masonry Vernacular, Minimal Traditional, Frame Vernacular, and Mediterranean- Revival. The following is a brief description of those styles: Frame Vernacular (1900-1940) - Constructed of wood framing and reflecting no high architectural .Age.°1 r` style or formal architectural design, the vernacular i house can be either symmetrical or asymmetrical in design. Built by laymen, often the owner, with no .II1 i='I ! • '.'I formal construction experience who utilized local � li building materials and craftsmanship techniques (also Masonry Vernacular). Mission Revival (1920-1935) - Minimally ornamented with built-up, flat roofs often with � _ _ stepped or curvilinear parapets, a wood or hollow clay tile frame with smooth or rough textured stucco exterior. Tile visor roofs over windows and entryways are also common. Fenestration often 19' includes casement windows and arched entryways. Mediterranean Revival (1915-1940) = Influenced by the Italian and Spanish ,/ � ';%//�/!/�/4•.�. styles and popularized by Henry Flagler tzr ~"' "```• and Addison Mizner, this style displays h � -_ ©� I low pitched, multi-plane roof lines often egg with red clay tiles and little or no �1s t` overhang. Tile visor roofs are also Pig ki R __ l common. A stucco exterior, often textured, _. covers an asymmetrical, wood or hollow clay tile frame. Arches are prevalent within the fenestration design including entryways, arcades, and colonnades. Minimal Traditional (1935-c.1950) — Typically, a ;;;ii� one-story building displaying a low or intermediate —;d pitched cross-gable roof with a large chimney. age.. Shares Tudor style traits such as rock or brick tle »y 1-1 6 I min . facing (particularly on the chimney) and minimal INN f w wood detailing. Popularized after World War II, mom ir��i ® this style is often associated with tract housing. _ IV. Historical & Cultural Significance The Dell Park plat was recorded in January 1922, submitted by Boyd Hawkins, President and General Manger of the Floridixi Farms Company as part of the 70 acres associated with the Seacrest neighborhood. Dell Park was platted in lots ranging from 24' to 65.5' wide; though the majority were platted at 50' wide lots. The area was originally a pineapple farm. As agriculture made way for the development boom of the 1920s, it is speculated that the land was available for purchase and development of single family homes. This is reflective of the mid-1920s Mission-Revival and Mediterranean influenced homes that can be seen today. According to the Seacrest Neighborhood Plan, only one home was constructed in 1922 but by the end of the decade, 45 homes were constructed throughout the Dell Park subdivision. The plat assigned street names influenced by western U.S. cities that included: Phoenix Path (NE 8 Street), Seattle Street (NE 9 Street), Santa-Fe Trail (NE 10 Street), Denver Drive (NE 11 Street), Salt Lake Way (NE 12 Street), Cheyenne Road (NE 13 Street), Boise Boulevard (NE 2 Avenue) and Sacramento Pass (NE 3 Avenue). At the time the plat was recorded, NE 2 Avenue, also known today as Seacrest Boulevard, ended at NE 13th Street with only pine scrub beyond and did not expand further north towards Boynton Beach until after World War II. One of the first houses in Dell Park was constructed on NE 9th Street east of NE 2nd Avenue according to an oral interview of Margaret Manning (who originally owned 222 NE 9'h Street), conducted by Dorothy Patterson, city archivist. The streets were lined with Coconut Palms at that time and NE 2nd Avenue was only a shell rock road. One prominent local family who settled in the area at this time was the O'Neal family who resided in Delray Beach since c. 1918. Samuel Elliot (S. E.) O'Neal was the eldest of four brothers who moved to Delray Beach from Fairfax County, South Carolina. The O'Neal brothers were produce farmers west of Delray for a number of years and gradually moved to town as the farm prospered. S. E. O'Neal married Shirley Bradley in 1921. They purchased 910 N. E. 2nd Avenue from Herbert Harrington on May 21, 1930. S. E. and Shirley O'Neal had one son, Bradley O'Neal. Bradley was the first Delray Beach resident to die in the armed forces in World War II. The local VFW Post is named in his honor who was killed during the Italian campaign in 1942. Bradley bequeathed one-half of his serviceman's life insurance policy, in the amount of $5,000, to the Delray Beach School Library. T. M. O'Neal, the next eldest brother, was listed in the 1920 Palm Beach County directory as a garage owner in the town of Delray Beach. He later entered the insurance business and maintained an office above Huber's Drugstore, a city landmark. T. M. O'Neal was • elected to the Delray Beach City Council for a two year term starting in 1925. He later became a Palm Beach County Commissioner. Fred A. O'Neal became a lawyer. The Delray Beach Historical Society has a file of stock certificates and patents indicating he invested in several local businesses (Frysinger-Brigante). The area developed slowly but steadily in the 1930s with the transition from more detailed Mediterranean inspired homes to Frame Vernacular and Masonry Vernacular dwellings. Clapboard clad houses with cross gable and hip roof are still prevalent between North Swinton Avenue and NE 2 Avenue. Most of the houses were constructed with rear cottages which served as temporary housing while the larger, main dwellings were being constructed. These cottages later served as rental housing for servicemen during World War II. Post World War II, the area experienced a construction boom in order to accommodate returning GIs. Masonry Vernacular and Minimal Traditional style construction prospered with more readily available manufactured materials and labor. According to Sandy Simon, Delray Beach historian, low cost housing was prevalent in this area and as construction expanded so too did the area's residential neighborhoods to the north towards the Delray-Boynton border. Local directories from 1953 clearly show both permanent residents and tourists in this area who rented the houses seasonally. The majority of the remainder of the neighborhood's building stock was constructed during the 1950s and 1960s including numerous Ranch style houses. These houses are considered non-contributing due to either age or lack of architectural integrity. V. Statement of Significance Pursuant to the LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(3), a district is deemed to have architectural or aesthetic significance if it fulfills one or more of the following criteria: (a) Portrays the environment in an era of history characterized by one or more distinctive architectural styles;and, (b) Embodies those distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, period, or method of construction; (c) Is a historic or outstanding work of a prominent architect, designer, landscape architect, or builder; or (d) Contains elements of design, detail, material, or craftsmanship of outstanding quality or which represented, in its time, a significant innovation or adaptation to the South Florida environment. To qualify as a historic site, or historic district, or historic interior, individual properties, structures, sites, or buildings, or groups of properties, structures, sites, or buildings must have significant character, interest, or value as part of the historical, cultural, aesthetic, and architectural heritage of the city, state, or nation. The area qualifies as a historic district under the following criterion: (a) portrays high styles and local interpretations of distinctive architectural styles and (b) embodies distinctive characteristics typical of those styles and period of construction. A significant concentration of the Mission Revival, Frame Vernacular, Masonry Vernacular, Mediterranean-Revival, and Minimal Traditional styles of architecture are prevalent within the proposed boundaries and the contributing status of these building is considerable as the majority of the buildings have maintained their architectural integrity. VI. Bibliography and Sources Delray Beach Surveys - Florida Master Site File Forms, 1999 & 2001 Dell Park Plat, January 1922 Sandy Simon, Delray Beach Historian, Phone Interview conducted with Wendy Shay, Delray Beach Preservation Planner, June 2004 Delray Beach Historical Society, Oral Interview with Margaret Manning (222 NE 9th Street), conducted by Dorothy Patterson, 1990. Miller's Delray Beach, Florida City Directory, Volume III., 1953-1954. Delray Beach Individually Listed Designation Report for 910 NE 2nd Avenue, prepared by Jack Frysinger and Starr Deppe-Brigante, 2002. Seacrest/Del-Ida Park Neighborhood Plan, City of Delray Beach/Delray Beach Community Redevelopment Agency, adopted March 3, 1998. 4 DEIRAY BEAQI DEEBAY BEAp HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD 1 I I I, MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT llir iw .zoo oos i , Agent: Robert J. Miller, Owner Project Name: Miller Residence Shed Project Location: 332 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action requested of the Board is consideration of a COA for the construction of a shed for 332 SE 7th Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND/PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject property is located on the west side of SE 7th Avenue, between SE 4th Street and SE 3rd Street, and is zoned R-1-AA (Single Family Residential). The property contains an existing single family residence that was built in the Ranch style in 1962. The structure is of c.b.s. construction with a slab foundation, and is considered a non- contributing building within the Marina Historic District. Over the years a number of repairs and alterations have been made to the site. In June 1989, a COA was submitted for the erection of a 6' high timber stockade fence along the north, south and part of the east boundaries of the property to match the pre- existing fence along the west boundary. This application was later amended to include roof repairs to the property through the removal of the existing white cement roofing tiles and their replacement with an identical tile, and the repair of the flat deck with tar and gravel. Subsequently, staff approved the changes. A more significant COA application was submitted in May 1996 for the enclosure of the car port under the north gable for use as a room and the installation of a decorative balustrade across the front porch roof between the two gables. In June, 1996, the Board approved the alterations and a recent inspection confirmed that the car port has been enclosed but the balustrade has not been constructed. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ANALYSIS Project Description The current proposal is for the construction of a wooden framed storage shed in the rear yard of the property 13' to the north of the south boundary fence. The shed will measure 20' long by 10' wide and approximately 8.5' in height to the mean of the hipped roof. November 17, 2004 Agenda Item: IV.A. 332 SE 7th Avenue Shed Page 2 The frame will be faced with vertically fixed timber board cladding which is to be painted white, and the roof will be covered with tin which will also be white in color. There is to be a timber French door with six glazed panels to the front (north) elevation of the shed facing the pool, and access will also be gained to the rear of the structure by a 6 over 6 panel solid timber door. The fenestration will include 2 small windows to the rear and one side of the structure and the applicant has stated that there will also be two small windows to the front façade at either side of the door. Analysis Development Standards LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(a-c), (E)(8)(g), (E)(8)(h), and (E)(8)(j) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation,as amended from time to time. (E)(7) The construction of new buildings or structures, or the relocation, alteration, reconstruction, or major repair or maintenance of a non-contributing building or structure within a designated historic district shall meet the same compatibility standards as any material change in the exterior appearance of an existing non-contributing building. Any material change in the exterior appearance if any existing non-contributing building, structure, or appurtenance in a designated historic district shall be generally compatible with the form, proportion, mass, configuration, building material, texture, color, and location of historic buildings, structures, or sites adjoining or reasonably approximate to the non-contributing building, structure, or site. (E)(8) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color of the façade of a building in association with the predominant material used in surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district. The Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation recommend that: (a) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. 332 SE 7t Avenue Shed Page 3 (b) New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. The proposed structure does display a continuity of design in relation to height, roof shape, color and scale; however, the timber cladding and tin roof are not consistent with the c.b.s. construction and cement tile roof covering of the existing dwelling, and the proportion of openings is not consistent with the dwelling. However, the proposed new structure, which is only 10' in height, will be installed to the rear of the dwelling (setback 99' from SE 7th Avenue) behind a 6' high timber fence and it is unlikely that it will be visible from the right of way. While not consistent with the above criteria, given these circumstances, the design of the structure can be supported. LDR Section 4.3.4(K) - Development Standards Matrix: The following table indicates that the proposal either meets or exceeds the requirements of LDR Section 4.3.4(K) as it pertains to the R-1AA zoning district: Standard Provided Building Setbacks (min.): Front 30' 99' Side Interior 10' 13' Side Street na' na Rear 10' 16' Building Height 35' 10' LDR Section 4.4.3(H)(2) — Special Regulations Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.3(H)(2), the floor area of the accessory structure shall not exceed 40% of the floor area of the principal structure. The overall square footage of the accessory structure is 200 sq. ft. which is 10% of the principal dwelling. It can therefore be considered in compliance with this section. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the COA for 332 SE 7th Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(J) (5) and 4.5.1 of the Land Development Regulations. C. Move denial of.the COA for 332 SE 7th Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(J) (5) and 4.5.1 of the Land Development Regulations. 332 SE 7th Avenue Shed Page 4 RECOMMENDATION Move approval of the COA for 332 SE 7th Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(J) (5) and 4.5.1 of the Land Development Regulations. Report prepared by Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner • 151 ... • jqea.A...- r .)K.--- ,... ' . • -------- F .... . . . . ClearWater 17 VIS . . ' .. , . . A ' ... . Geck-7>cl givit,e-d < . id)( '-`2"- _ -$,....,,nktx-Jr . 3' 111 /.24' .1/45--‘ .- 11.1\ -2 ' 5 i 1 01111111.K.,,...- -, ., . • 1 b VeNkii‘.0‘ 1 1 .. . ,..i . .1t I • I, • •.. '.. . 4.1 6 —.• rp, ,. i r:::..-••••••" til U (;" 1 ,_.-----• /3' - •.4i6.•„444,'--. ---------„ • , .-.4.i.t.. !..— ,-'--------- • 1 1 . .1 # • ii,cm . ' 8)-0c.K. . .u. oi , 4. 1: 6 1 vtl) . -.. 1 . ,''. • - 1 .21,91 ,zt.. 45 -l'•'•• •'•• '. . k 4I 1 - . • ''.'13'".7"....' ' '3 .;- '.• ' .'. '• • al 2, . , . . - • k . '4' i'.1.'OH { • °A1(110 . '' ' n• /1 L •• . I •61,..1„1:,.,,,,,i 1414. •.., 1 / .. . . ..— . .....— .. 3 k ' .kAi;\'.-‘4 .• • ••,'''''t - 1 :1 . , . . , . , 1 c2 . . .-__7: __,,.._. . .... . 1 y• I , ce55 r... . . 1 'tr ,...,...1...) "-A /2-.----..• . . ID . .... . .... b .67 • . • . . tb ..., . ., . • ..r., 1 R . . 1 . • • ) . . • . • . ...•:-44, . . • :.47.,-•••• ••,!,, „1,0„:,44....,,f.; ,,,T,J,..4,-,.:"Ifq.%,,,,,,---4.,...,1.,10 . ... ,,,rt"r,..4 ••••.. t ir„, ..,,,4•• ...,. . •• .-•„.•---•••4.i... _ . . . . •• • •.7i--Ittc.4)., •'...•:-,,'d,4''17",:4- •-,ri:V.-...',4i.f-tii$'1=-t."'in z.r %.'2'444......, ;.',:';;•-.,..:?,,-;s4 - ...:si- '..1..-:‘•4p_...,Ii...t e_,,i(At....L.n...':,...,,p ‘,.., '.1' '' Nin'-',...i p:h4.'q.t..laki•-j.....--....A..•• •-",i,..z...1k7Ce-A'• -,14tf•-',,kPr4 ''' .,_',),ii,:,=.4..%`-y....;.,34,4 ,..--;4!ry'..,,- ....',... . )1".1*..0'Z':30'.4'11'7::Y.1.""4'-''':'.' ': .`.r.N. ''.11;,' ,''''''''‘I'4:714--', A.liO'r• 'ALA.:i'li..4...-''.1-V"'... ;;',.:i.'.i'•.? .4.t:%.',''.,:,',14,` iCit'll,.*•c.-..'f:•'..,...,4-....t'...',;•''',!,,4. ,4,/,;:...b.ii,,..t., ,,,Al.V.-,t,P,:,,<,,-;-ki",*.i. ,,,::',-;F. , , -.7:-. ,•'4.itAs. * 1,'. ::,IN:t•,,,,....li...4. 7.,, -1,4(0.4 7...k.'' 'e'•"1,77:!;,'.yi.,041.i...:.. ;.4,..., 4-....„:„.04.!,•,,,,,,_,ip..--.,-_-,:z,z;.j...lin- ,.,•,:.,,.0,,6..t,....,;,:... . ,• .4.,../.'4.,„10.,,,•!'-vf,- ;2`44!•::t:',1"4.,to,'-',...lii.‘,'"Af.:1.1".-1 .. -X..*-•••-`..* ,.frt-'41:1,•:` . '4,44;1'4 ;',4110.icK !.041- .74-...i:" .,-'53Ak'f'k,;,..rft,!...F';„.:',4'.. '..i.`.:,1'-.$ 44-.,....,,,;,,,v,:.;.1,.'',';:-• ,,fi::,PZ,Sfr. ,"‘A..T‘..‘ec''0§.1, - ,.‘--.A .i' -,;,::I ..1:;,v,4C•.„,.. • ,,'.?, - -,3.7,. „•-:0,2„0.41..,.. ,.......• ,:,.1 Q,I.,1•,1: .1:41,44.1,-. ,,,:t1, ,„.•,,.. '.0,- "•...,.1:.,..,7i-i,„i.,..5-;..•„4„,4, ,•:.4 ',4-e-tx.41.,T.4,x....., ..*No-A-,,4i--,,;..-.,^-•-.•-.,•.,,,4-'.-.'•A-.c...•..0.'4,"1.:'s§.i'.-•',.'-,,...6:,-k..'.r.•-1-:1-••."a_:.t:•.•..,.:..4.,4c..-...i..;-1•..,.;i-t"7-Z.,;..,,r-.*.;?Ce.:.i•.4.f..!j,,4 T':44..';''...t.4,'-4;.-..'.!,,N,i.,•Al-..el'i..'.A.:s'9.s...e.,-.••.l,e•,.".,„'..,..",'..--,,.4..,..4....‘c•,......,•V,4,ikvv..v'e%s Vil..i41,•.-i'..-.<.'f--1•:,4,,-4,e.4f'1•1.v 0i.tc.it._t,,.i..:.r.t:.t 4,.i.•'i,,.t..-•i4,..,,-..i”...„.t.1.:t..:.::,..:.m...r.-/,,..4.4,0,,.,,,,,k77,,;'W•.,;:0k:"x,.l.-f07I,.i.hs.,.i....t.1.K4..i)*:i.,t•e‘;„4.'•.t,,.0t,,...0,'".,.k:..,..,3.'..2••:.'.-..'f..1•;..",•4;...".,.,!r.4,:.f,....,,..:•...,7...:,?.•.0,.:•,:•...''.-.-,,-...-.;''•,-,.•.'.; 4-f.F.te.:0•I i•g•P,•'.".t.;,.'.k-•;;',,....!,;r%•;'":,.,I.:-.,p;!s•`,r?..".'..-.:•-.-••,.•,.;,.•' .'‘•-,••-./•..•,5..,••,.-1..,,1•7...--!..6<4.".,,-*e'•.•S.'..'-4'.„.'•...4 i•-g.q.••.t.•'.1i„.i-.h•i-.,V.r..'.'.,.,4;','•.'.'',s.,.,f7.':V,,.e,..4,,-,.,f',.F,-,ci 0.I,•.`.`21.A•0'.•j,A,.i..4.,.V..,/„,,.',-,7.1„:'.-.-A....,?:4.„.•.•e:.'1j:`..-.---:7!......,1t.•,:,';.,:.,,•.,,,•.,,.,/,k'.1 t.k.-)i'.1,.'..c\',,4'•,.•--174.;•...z ...%--.,;-'...?.",.1.--t..-.-.•.,•,.;,,.--•,1..-~Si '.-.,‘-,.). 4 '7 ' ‘ , , FI .:-:.-: . " . m 4 s- ,. , .,:.!...:- %,-,...,• ,: ‘. .4.4, ..*- 4f,' • p!..,. .(4,11f.,„,,. , ,,' , . 1...:, . ,. -0,;‘,2..f. .4,.t.. ,.„_ .-...(14,^ .• .'im,,;.„.5,,, ....• ,a1:..:,.,..fr. •,. .......• ,... i..1..4..t ,.?,,.. .44. '„ -•-' • . . . . .:,.4.11:,:. '*21 ", '• .• * r•::. :,.. ;'-`,.4',' ' . I.._:s. ,4. ,'". • ,! .... ,`,, S' 4A'.1.,... . ..••-....vp-•. .• ..c.„,..f.,4,147,v...$..Ati.. ,,,...,%.iej ,,..,,A,•••••, : i.st.t., !r.L.. . .,:,-, ::11-m•ri, :-). :),.q.,;-,......-:. :;...f.:...--.. •:.•:,.!:•.:•' . • • ,.. J04: ,: , .......,:e..,::, ....• :4.•—•...A-1/4,, 4. .• . ./ . AW. t?*• .-*\4' " ,, '. ! . . ;...:.4'•'''' ..1-41'.'..: :.,...,7'. ; ,1 .• 04' , .•: L' ..',' . ••4 ......se l'it,h . .. $ 1. - -r-r•-..-•:;•... •.. '''' 0. ..•,,,.1.,- . iI "? .• ,-.:%-- .II.4'- . ,3 ----'"''.."-''''''''-''''. • 1 ...-......., ... —. ... -.- .t. i ------=--- . •* $1 -..., _ ,_. .,...,-4.—.4---i-,-•4-- -- -1 10`,0' 1,1' . . ,itt.-,.;,..<4:k.'1 t'••?-1-'•'' f,.1,_.:...,-..--- -'''''J'" ":"' - / , i 1. I 1 I t.g.',,,,:•,' . ':,i- ,o,,-,., . ,,,.._I-7! .1"..7-,. ..- .., 1. 4 1 ,. - (- =-,,... =....44., -..,... • •-•,L ' ' 1r . 1 1 1 i . ! 1 1 t ! 1,,4•."..g• - . ,11:,r..t ...-.7.,.....-P. \ . ,.,:t,....,.•I , 1 . „ e" ,..„ -;...i -.--• , , 11 1 6 ,.. .. . ,0 I i [ i I i 1 i• ii.:1,-,,-1,;..• i', I_, ,' ' ' • '' ' '"11 ti- 4,,-.• '',...' q-_- • . i t -r- :' ' 1 11,',t- - , .-.. ' I 1 i T.1:`'M. Ar.,'s a. e. :1_2-&:,-,,,,, _, : . i F ' 1 1.;.„ i -,,,,..,.., i ..c.„,- Li,.: ,-4,•1-.4-.L, .4.,,.---7-. - --- '.=,.. , 1 i ! i t :.-'F!'= - : -f:.-': ,,;., - --,-- .,,,,.4,',.., ' 1 1,--,, i I i *. ........,,1,- . i .i,....- :. ,I. , 1 I !-.,, .:.:-I,-.:.1-',- i.,,E.-4„...,A....... s.....,........ . 7,-.,. l'f....,;::. : ' 11.. , i . i 1 ' ' I ,s,,..:11:-4.:yr. i ; ---- ________ . - ........ ,.. , --77 • ) • :, ,, .44,,,,,,, 1,,,.,,.. 44-;.:46%.- ,s,,,,4..:-...—.• _ ...'" : *.4_ ..,,..... ,. ..... . , .• C _ $ I"'A • DELL RAYN BbrittE1 EACH F I O A All-America City 1993 0 2001 SIGN IN SHEET 2 001 Regular Historic Preservation Board Meeting November 17, 2004 PRINT FULL NAME ADDRESS OR ITEM NO. ORGANIZATION rSIS ,v,Swtti i PA- i 2-\C 1 13 s C(U 7 IQwciA, 7 /11, t/c.) 5-cow J ' 4 �Gi3r� C //6 AE ,u0 14c)�, Ovi \Jp P r 5 (f f ( 2 hJA-or 7 i46,-14l/19S e 72ol Jc�Ji/V Isle �"�