Loading...
HPB 12-21-05 0.0 AGENDA �� HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING e4''4Y 8 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: December 21, 2005 Time: 6:00 P.M. Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: City Commission Chambers, City Hall The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service,program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Randolph at 243-7127(voice), or 243-7199(TDD), 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing,such persons will need a record of these proceedings,and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Two or more City Commissioners may be in attendance. I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES August 17, 2005 September 7, 2005 III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. 236 Dixie Blvd., Del-Ida Park Historic District,Anne Gannon, Owner Consideration of a Variance to the side interior setback and Certificate of Appropriateness Associated with the Installation of a Trellis. B. Old School Square Parking Garage, City of Delray Beach, Owner Consideration of a Class V Site Plan Application associated with the construction of a parking garage. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS VII. REPORTS AND COMMENTS • Public Comments • Reports from Historic District Representatives • Board Members • Staff VIII. ADJOURN Amy E.AIv z, Historic Preservatie I ner Posted on: December 14, 2005 P. 1 * COMMUNICATION RESULT REPORT ( SEP. 6.2005 1:09PM ) * * * .TTI CITY OF DELRAY BEACH FILE MODE OPTION ADDRESS (GROUP) RESULT PAGE 774 MEMORY TX '92729065 OK P. 4/4 • REASON FOR ERROR E-1) HANG UP OR LINE FAIL E-2) BUSY E-3) NO ANSWER E-4) NO FACSIMILE CONNECTION PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 414, 100 N.W. 1st AVENUE DfLRtAbrAPH 4L' I" : DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33444 j; .. ;,i• • .fi AII�Amed�Cltyf -.. •• f• (561) 243-7041 r t � � (561) 243-7221 FAX Y e-mail: valek@ci.delrav-beach.fl.us cw 7993 200.1 FASCIMILE COVER SHEET DATE: September 6, 2005 TO: Claudio Camilucci Fax No. 272-9065 FROM: Denise A. Valek Fax No. 661-243-7221 Planning &Zoning Department Phone: 561-243-7041 SUBJECT: 275 North Swinton Avenue- Sign Approval Historic Preservation Board Meeting -September 7, 2005 Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 4 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA MEETING DATE: August 17, 2005 LOCATION: City Commission Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Francisco Perez Azua, Maura Dersh, and Michelle Reich, Jr., and Randee Schatz MEMBERS ABSENT: John Miller, Jr., Jeffrey Silberstein, and Linda Lake STAFF PRESENT: Warren Adams, Terrill Barton, and Denise Valek I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Perez at 6:15 p.m. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. No one from the Public addressed the Board on non-agenda items. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. PRESENTATIONS A. Old School Square Garage Proposed Elevations Mr. Richard Hasko presented the Parking Garage to the Board. This facility is intended to be built as a Delray Beach Municipal parking garage facility. The cost of this garage is estimated at $11,400,000. We welcome your comments; however, anything that is added will drive the costs up. This presentation will come before all the Boards in the City. At the end of that process we will take all of the comments and bring them together and will address as many of the comments as we can. We will present this to the City Commission in September. Mr. Ian Nestler, PGAL Architects, presented the project to the Board. The garage would have approximately 510 to 530 parking spaces. The garage will have a total of 16,900 square feet of retail on the ground floor fronting both NE 2nd Avenue and NE 1st Street. Mr. Hasko inquired if there were any questions from the Board. Ms. Reich inquired if the exterior colors have been selected. Mr. Hasko advised not as yet. Chairman Perez advised he liked the gable ends. Ms. Dersh inquired about the traffic on 1st Avenue. is one reserve ion oar mu es August 17, 2005 Mr. Aronson, Parking Management Specialist, advised the street will be a two-way. ; Mr. Hasko advised this will require active traffic control. Mr. Nestler advised there is a speed ramp from the second floor and stacking of cars inside the garage. Chairman Perez read a summary of the Quasi-Judicial Hearing procedures. The Notary swore in individuals for testimony. IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. 134 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic Area, Currie, Sowards, Aguila Architects, Agent Item Before the Board: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with the installation of a storm protection and new window sashes. Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. There were none. Mr. Adams entered the project file into the record. The subject property consists of Lot 12 (Less the East 5 Feet of NE 1st Avenue Right-of-Way), Block 67, Town of Delray and is located on the west side of NE 1st Avenue, between NE 1st Street and NE 2nd Street. The single story structure was built in 1935 in the Vernacular style, and is typical of the many small cottages built for use as winter homes during the 1930s. The building is a contributing structure within the Old School Square Historic District and is zoned OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District). In November, 1994, the Historic Preservation Board approved, subject to conditions, the Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Design Elements associated with a mixed-use development consisting of offices and a residence. The proposal included the conversion of the 736 square foot historic structure to offices; an 847 square foot office addition and a 449 square foot apartment; the addition of 6 parking spaces; and, associated landscaping. An associated waiver to allow parking in the front yard was also approved. In December, 1994, the City Commission approved an associated waiver to reduce the required five (5) foot perimeter landscape area to two (2)feet. In March, 2005, administrative approval was given for the replacement of the roof shingles, and, in May, 2005, administrative approval was given for a replacement wood picket fence. The current proposal involves the installation of `Fabric-Shield' storm protection to the doors and windows of the structure and the replacement of the existing wood window sashes with aluminum clad wood sashes. "Fabric-Shield" storm panels are made from PVC-coated translucent fabric panels which let in daylight, yet provide protection against rain, wind, and storm-blown debris. The panels have passed windload, impact, and cycling testing in accordance with the Florida 3 Historic Preservation Board Minutes August 17, 2005 Building Code and Miami-Dade County protocols. The panels are attached over building openings by means of anchors mounted around the openings and have several advantages over other forms of hurricane protection. They can be easily removed, folded, and stored after hurricanes, no tracks are required, they are light in weight, they can be deployed quickly, and they are translucent and allow diffused light to enter the structure. As no applications have been received for the installation of this product, there is no local evidence as to how it will perform in a hurricane; however, according to the attached information, the panels meet the requirements of the Florida Building Code and Miami- Dade County protocols. As the panels are a relatively new product, the Design Guidelines do not make reference to them and concentrate mainly on the installation of shutters. However, the Design Guidelines recommend the use of removable panels because they are not a permanent fixture on buildings. 'Fabric-Shield' storm panels can, therefore, also be regarded as appropriate as they can be removed after hurricanes and, as they are fixed to structures with unobtrusive anchors, they do not require the installation of permanently fixed tracks for panels. This is also in accordance with LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8), which state that appurtenances on buildings should be visually compatible. Based on the above analysis, therefore, the proposal can be supported based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(8) and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. It should be noted; however, that, in the event of a hurricane, an inspection of the property should be undertaken to assess the level of protection given by the panels. Replacement window sashes: The applicant also wishes to remove the existing wood frame sashes of the windows and install white, aluminum clad wood windows of an identical four over one light configuration. Repairing the existing windows or replacing them with an identical design would be the most appropriate methods for repairing this building according to the LDRs, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation; however, the existing sashes are in poor condition and require replacement. The applicant has stated that the proposed sashes for all of the windows will be white, aluminum clad wood. In similar cases, the Board has recommended approval of the installation of aluminum clad wood windows to only those elevations which are visible from the public right-of-way, while aluminum frames have been approved for the remaining windows. In this case, the applicant is proposing aluminum clad wood frames for all of the windows, therefore, positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8)(c) and (g), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation can be made, subject to conditions. Jess Sowards, Architect, for the project, was present to answer any questions, and advised that this new product is neater and cleaner than accordion shutters. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing. 4 is one reserva ion oar mu es August 17,2005 It was moved by Ms. Reich, seconded by Ms. Dersh, and approved 4 to 0 to move approval of the COA for 134 NE 1st Avenue by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 4.5.1(E)(8) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. B. 215 NE 5th Court, Del-Ida Park Historic District, Abisset Corp., Agent Item Before the Board: Consideration of Appropriateness associated with the construction of an addition. Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. There were none. Mr. Adams entered the project file into the record. The subject property consists of the east 20 feet of Lot 6 and Lot 7, Block 9, Del-Ida Park. Located on the north side of NE 5th Court, approximately 200' east of NE 2nd Avenue, the property is zoned Multiple Family Residential (Low Density) (RL) and is within the Del-Ida Park Historic District. The property contains a 1,223 square foot non-contributing one-story duplex, which was constructed in 1951 in the Masonry Vernacular style. The duplex is of CBS construction and consists of two residential units (215 & 217 NE 5h Court)which are linked together by a finished enclosed porch area. The subject property (215 NE 5th Court) has a total floor area of 420 square feet. While the duplex is currently classed as non-contributing, a 2001 survey suggests that it could be classified as contributing when the district is re-evaluated as it `...is associated with the developmental history and exhibits the architectural elements of the Del-Ida Park area during the 1950's.' There are no recent administrative or Board actions pertaining to this property. The current proposal is to construct a 192 square foot, one-story addition to the front (south) of the existing dwelling. The addition will be constructed in the Masonry Vernacular style similar to the existing dwelling and will contain a bedroom. The proposal is to construct a 192 square foot, one-story addition to the front (south) of the extant dwelling. The addition will be constructed in the Masonry Vernacular style similar to the existing dwelling and will contain a bedroom. The external walls will be of stucco and the roof will be flat to match the existing dwelling. The proposed windows for the addition appear to be single hung with a one over one light configuration which will differ from the awning windows on the existing dwelling. No color scheme has been provided. The proposed addition is compatible with the existing dwelling and the Del-Ida Park Historic District in terms LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(a-k). Further, with regard to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards, the new addition will be differentiated from the existing dwelling through the proposed use of a differing window design. The proposed addition; however, does not conform with the recommendations of the Design Guidelines as it will be added to the front of the existing dwelling. However, the proposal can be supported for a number of reasons. The existing dwelling is extremely small in area (420 square feet) and comprises of a living room, bathroom, and kitchen. The addition of the 5 Historic Preservation Board Minutes August 17, 2005 bedroom will result in an improved residence with a total floor area of 612 square feet and will insure its continued use and repair. It is noted the LDR currently require efficiencies to contain a minimum of 400 sq. ft. and one bedroom units to contain a minimum of 600 sq. ft. These improvements meet these minimum requirements. While it would be more appropriate to add the addition to the rear of the dwelling; the bathroom is currently to the rear, and this would involve altering the entire internal layout of the property. The required front setback for one-story structures in the RL zoning district is 25'. On completion, the addition will have a setback of 32.7'. The existing dwelling is non-contributing; however, a 2001 survey suggests that it could be classified as contributing when the district is re-evaluated. However, at the time of the survey, the dwelling had just turned 50 years old and, if it had any architectural or historical merit, it is likely it would have been classified as contributing at that time. Further, no historical association can be found for the dwelling, it is relatively plain in architectural terms, and further examples of this dwelling can be found in the City of Delray Beach. While the proposed addition can be differentiated from the existing dwelling by the use of a differing window design, it is a condition of approval that further differentiation is incorporated into the design. This may be achieved by reducing the height of the addition, reducing the eaves overhang, altering the texture of the stucco, or offsetting the west elevation slightly from the existing dwelling. In reviewing the site pictures it does appear that accommodating this addition will require removal of an existing ficus tree. The applicant should consider replacing this tree. Positive findings can be made with regard Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k) of the Land Development Regulations as well as the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, subject to conditions. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Board discussion ensued regarding the following: ■The two existing parking spaces in front of the building will stay. ■The landscape plan will be discussed with the landscape architect. ■The new addition will match the existing one. ■The colors will be approved administratively It was moved by Ms. Schatz, Seconded by Ms. Dersh, and approved 4 to 0 to move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness for 215 NE 5th Court by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8) (a-k), the Delray Beach* Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: 1) That a color scheme is submitted. 6 is ono reserve ion oar nu es August 17, 2005 2) That further differentiation between the existing dwelling and the proposed addition is incorporated into the design. 3) That no trees are to be removed from the site unless prior permission and tree removal permits are obtained from the Building Department. 4) The above items will be handled administratively. C. 305 SE 7th Avenue, Marina Historic District, Keith Spina, Agent Item Before the Board: Consideration of Appropriateness associated with the construction of an addition and a setback variance request. Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. There were none. Mr. Adams entered the project file into the record. The subject property consists of Lot 3 and the north 20 feet of Lot 4, Block 128, Blank-Nichols Subdivision. Located on the east side of SE 7`h Avenue, south of SE 3rd Street, the property is zoned Single Family Residential (R-1-AA) and is within the Marina Historic District. The property contains a 3,487 square foot Frame Vernacular dwelling. Although constructed in 1946, a 1999 survey of the Marina Historic District classed the structure as non-contributing because of the modifications to the building and its lack of historical association. At its meeting of September 6, 2000, the Board approved an application to renovate the dwelling including roof repairs, the replacement of the patio roof and the installation of decorative details along with the construction of a carport. These improvements have been constructed. The current proposal is a request for the construction of a 32 square foot bay window addition to the rear (east) elevation and a variance request for the reduction of the north side interior setback from 10' to 6.75'. The proposal is to construct a 32 square foot bay window addition to the rear (east) elevation. The addition will be constructed in a similar style to the existing dwelling and will be attached to the east elevation of a 1990 addition to the dwelling. It will be clad with a stone veneer, the roof will be of composition shingle, and the windows will match the existing. It will be lower in height than the 1990 addition and it will therefore be identifiable as a further addition. There will be some loss of fabric when the existing external wall is removed; however, this will be the 1990 fabric and not part of the original dwelling. The addition is to the rear of the dwelling and will not be visible from the public right-of-way. It will be visible from the Intracoastal Waterway; however, this is a small addition which in no way dominates the existing structure. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with regard Sections 2.4.6(H)(5) and 4.5.1 (E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8) of the Land Development Regulations as well as the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), the required side interior setback for properties within the R-1-AA zoning district is ten feet (10') and the proposed side interior setback for the proposed addition is 6.75'. The applicant has requested a variance from LDR Section 4.3.4(K) 7 Historic Preservation Board Minutes August 17,2005 Pursuant to LDR Section 2.2.6(D), the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) shall act on all variance requests within an historic district, or on a historic site, which otherwise would be acted upon by the Board of Adjustment. Prior to granting a variance, HPB must make certain findings pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(A)(5): Mr. Keith Spina, architect was here to answer any questions regarding the project. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. The Board concurred that it was a nice project. Addition: It was moved by Ms. Dersh, seconded by Ms. Reich, and approved 4 to 0 to move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness for 305 SE 7th Avenue by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Variance Request: It was moved by It was moved by Ms. Dersh, seconded by Ms. Reich, and approved 4 to 0 to approve the variance to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), to reduce the required side interior setback (north) from 10' to 6.75' by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in LDR Section 4.5.1(J). D. 706 SE 2nd Street, Marina Historic District, Enrique Martinez Celaya Item Before the Board: Consideration of Appropriateness associated with the demolition of a dwelling. Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. There were none. Mr. Adams entered the project file into the record. The subject property consists of Lot E less the east 148.3 feet of the north 145.6 feet, The Moorings, Delray Beach. The property is situated on the south side of SE 2nd Street approximately 150' east of SE 7th Avenue and contains a 2,163 square foot contributing, one-story, Cottage style single- family dwelling. From the records available, there is some confusion as to when the structure was built as a 1986 survey suggests it was constructed in 1936, the Property Appraisers website suggests 1956, and the building record card suggests 1936, 1951 and 1971. The property is zoned Single Family Residential (R-1-AA) and is situated within the Marina Historic District. The dwelling is of wood frame and stucco construction and is in a poor condition, particularly the south section which is cracking and is not depicted on the building record card. There are no recent administrative or Board actions pertaining to this property. 8 is one reserve on oar mu es August 17, 2005 The current proposal is for the demolition of the dwelling. At the time of survey in 1986, the structure was classed as a contributing building as it was deemed to be architecturally significant, it was in excellent condition, and it was unaltered. The plan of the structure on the survey record is identical to the plan on the building card; however, these plans bear little resemblance to what is actually in existence now. The building card was last updated in 1971 when a frame addition costing $27,000 and an NC system costing $1,200 were approved. Analysis of the available evidence suggests that the development history of the dwelling is as follows: 1936 Original cottage dwelling constructed. 1951 Kitchen and dining room added to the north of the dwelling. 1971 Addition added to the south of the dwelling when details were added to the building record card but the plan was not updated. 1986 Dwelling classed as being contributing without a full survey being undertaken which would explain its description as `unaltered'. Further evidence of the above can be found in the construction of the three phases as there is a solid floor in the central (original) section and wood floors in the north and south additions. Also, the central (original) section retains what appears to be an original window and one design of shutter while the two additions have windows of a later design and differing shutter design. The applicant has submitted his own theory as to the construction history (attached); however, it is clear that the original dwelling has been substantially altered over time. There are a number of different windows inserted into all three of the building phases, and a sun room has been added to the rear of the original dwelling which is accessed from a large opening cut into the original rear wall. The dwelling is also in a very poor condition with obvious decay in the floors, windows, walls and roofing timber. The external walls of the addition to the south are cracking which is probably caused by poor construction and poor ground conditions. In support of the application for demolition, the applicant has submitted a letter outlining his theories on the inappropriate development of the dwelling and has stated that plans are being developed for the construction of a new dwelling. It should be noted at this point that the design of the new dwelling will be required to meet strict historic preservation design guidelines to ensure compatibility with design and massing in relation to the surrounding area. The demolition of a historic structure is a loss to the community and the city; however, when architectural significance and authenticity are lost it is difficult to justify the structure being classed as contributing. Demolition of the dwelling will not have an adverse effect on the Marina Historic District as it cannot be seen from the public right-of-way. However, it can be seen from the Intracoastal Waterway and, as such, any new structure will have to be compatible with the other waterfront properties in the district. Based upon the above, therefore, positive findings can be made with regard to Sections 4.5.1(F)(1)(a-e) of the Land Development Regulations, subject to conditions. 9 Historic Preservation Board Minutes August 17,2005 While the Board can impose a 6 month delay in the demolition of a contributing structure to allow another site to be found for its relocation, it is not anticipated that anyone would be willing to pay the expense of moving a house of this particular design and condition. Mr. Jose Lorenzo, the applicant, advised he reviewed the report and will follow the recommendations. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Board discussion ensued and it was agreed that the dwelling should be demolished. Mr. Adams advised that several alterations were made to the dwelling over several years. It was moved by Ms. Reich, seconded by Ms. Schatz, and approved 4 to 0 to move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness for 706 SE 2nci Street by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in LDR Sections 4.5.1(F)(1)(a-e), subject to the following conditions: 1. That the structure is fully recorded prior to demolition and the survey details are deposited in the local archives. The survey should include a site location plan, measured drawings, photographs and any existing documentary information. 2. That, in the course of the demolition no trees are removed from the site unless prior permission and tree removal permits are obtained from the Building Department. E. 226 South Ocean Boulevard, Nassau Street Historic District, Roger Cope, Agent Item Before the Board: Consideration of Appropriateness associated with the relocation of a dwelling and the construction of an addition. Mr. Adams entered the project file into the record. The subject property is located on the northwest corner of Nassau Street and S. Ocean Boulevard within the Nassau Park Historic District. The property encompasses the south 21.65' of Lot 1, all of Lot 2 and the east 35' of Lot 3, Nassau Park subdivision and consists of 0.41 acres. The property is zoned Multiple Family Residential (RM). The main house, located on the south side of the property, was constructed in 1936. The construction date of the guest cottage is unknown however City records indicate that it was constructed prior to 1949. Both structures were built in the Resort Cottage style of the 1930's and are contributing buildings. There is also a single story residential structure at the northwest corner of the site which was used as a rental unit. On November 7, 2000, the Historic Preservation Board approved a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class II site plan modification for the construction of a 2nd floor addition on the guest house (north building) and conversion of the structure from an illegally converted duplex to a single family dwelling; construction of a one story addition on the main house (south building); construction of a pool and deck on the east side of the property; construction of a 4'-3' high masonry wall on the south and east sides of the 10 Historic Preservation oar mu es August 17,2005 property; and, installation of associated landscaping. Variances to reduce the front and side setbacks pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K)were also approved. On June 20, 2001, the Board approved the addition of decorative shutters to the windows. The Board approved the shutters noting several locations where the dimensions of the shutters needed modification, and requiring that hardware associated with the shutters be added. On August 1, 2001, the HPB approved minor elevation changes and a pre-construction application for an ad valorem tax exemption. During the Board meeting on January 16, 2002, the Board reviewed and approved the construction of a cricketed gable entrance with posts separate from the structure on the front facade of the rear cottage. In February 2003, the City Commission approved the ad valorem tax exemption request for the completed work to the property. In March, 2005, the applicant submitted a COA application for the demolition of the former maid's quarters, the relocation or demolition of the original residence (south building), and for the construction of a new three-story 7,694 (under air) single family residence and covered parking area. The applicant was advised that neither of the demolitions nor the construction of such a large residence would be supported and almost 30 emails were received from residents of the district opposing the proposal. This application was subsequently withdrawn and the current proposal was submitted. The current proposal is to move the south building east on the site, add a two-story addition to the west facade, demolish the later addition on the north elevation and construct a new addition and convert the dwelling at the northwest corner of the site from a rental unit to a two-car garage. Analysis: Relocation of South Building -The relocation of a historic structure is to be avoided when possible and should only be considered as a last resort to save the structure and insure its continued use. In this case, the applicant wishes to enlarge the dwelling through the construction of an addition to the west (rear) facade of the existing dwelling and by removing the later addition from the north facade and constructing a larger one. The proposed locations of the additions are appropriate as, in accordance with the Design Guidelines, they will be added to the least public sides of the existing dwelling. In order to provide the required space for the additions and to meet the current minimum setbacks, the historic structure will be moved approximately 5' to the south, and approximately 26' to the east. The relocated structure will have a front setback of 35' (25' required) and a side street setback of 15' (15' required for a single family residence). The relocated dwelling and patio to the east will be outside the Coastal Construction Control Line. As stated, the relocation of historic structures should be avoided; however, in this case, the structure will remain on its original site and the relocation will allow the construction of additions to meet the requirements of the owner. The relocation of a historic structure to another position on its original site was previously approved by the Board for 114 NE 1st Street. 11 Historic Preservation Board Minutes August 17,2005 Demolition: The proposal includes the demolition of the later addition to the north elevation of the historic dwelling to allow a larger one-story addition to be constructed. As this is a later addition, there are no concerns with regard to the proposed demolition. Additions: The proposed addition to the west facade will be 2 stories (29') high, and the addition to the north facade will be 1 story (approximately 14') high. The maximum height allowable is 35'. The first floor of the additions will contain a dining room, family room, office, a guest bedroom with exercise room, three bathrooms and a two-car garage. The second floor will contain a living room, family room, dining room, two bedrooms, two bathrooms, a powder room and four balcony areas. The total new first floor area will be 2,093 square feet (including garage) and the total new second floor area will be 1,637 square feet. The current total area of the historic structure is 1,160 square feet and the proposed total area of the historic dwelling plus the additions will be 4,890 square feet. The additions will be constructed in a Vernacular architectural style with stucco applied to the first floor external walls and 'Hardiplank' applied to the second floor external walls. The roof will be surfaced with asphalt shingles to match the historic dwelling and dormer windows will be incorporated into the east and south pitches. The windows and balcony doors will be of multipane design and constructed of white aluminum. The proposed color scheme for the additions will be `Paradise Beach' for the 'Hardiplank' siding and 'Good Vibrations' for the stucco. The historic structure will retain its present color of 'Mauve Pink'. LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8) states that improvements to structures in historic districts shall be visually compatible with respect to height, proportion of openings, relationship of materials, texture, and color, roof shape and scale. Externally, the proposed one-story addition to the north meets these requirements and, in accordance with the Design Guidelines, it is subordinate to the main mass of the historic dwelling. The two-story addition to the west elevation can be seen as compatible in terms of materials, texture, and color, proportion of openings, and roof shape. However, the height has been designed to be compatible with the structure to the north as opposed to the existing historic dwelling or the other dwellings within the historic district. When viewed from South Ocean Boulevard or Nassau Street, the height and the inclusion of the dormer windows results in the proposed addition dominating the historic dwelling. The historic dwelling becomes secondary and subordinate to the addition, which conflicts with the Design Guidelines. Consideration should be given to the surrounding buildings and the compatibility of the addition in terms of size, scale, materials, mass and roof form. The roof height should be lowered and, as the dormers are to provide extra light to the second floor, consideration should be given to replacing them with skylights. The applicant has stated that skylights will have no historic relevance to the proposed roof; however, if they are a modern design, they could be additional features which distinguish the new construction from the old. There is a concern that, in the proposal, both the first and second floors contain a living room, kitchen, dining room, and family room and that there is only one access from the historic dwelling to the two-story addition. The access could be blocked up to provide two separate units. If two separate units were created, the structure would be classed as a duplex and would be subject to different requirements of the LDRs such as the required number of parking spaces, the required setbacks and the required distance between buildings. For a single family dwelling, the required side street setback is 15'; however, a 12 Historic Preservation Board Minutes August 17,2005 duplex would require 25'. The proposed distance between the subject dwelling and the single family residence to the north is 10'. If the subject dwelling was a duplex, the required distance would be 42.33'. The applicant has stated that the dwelling will remain as a single family residence and that the proposed layout will allow his mother to stay with him but give each of them their own space. There is currently a Unity of Title on the property which, according to the proposal, will contain two single family residences. If, in the future, the applicant opted to subdivide the parcel and split the two structures into separate ownership parcels, the required side interior setbacks of 7W could not be met as currently proposed as there will only be a total of 10' between the structures. The proposal also only allows a distance of 1' from the swimming pool to the new 4' high fence. Again, if two ownership parcels were requested, it is unlikely the request would be supported as the setback requirements could not be met. • To comply with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation further differentiation between the historic construction and the new construction should be incorporated into the design. Windows with a differing light configuration, differing shutter styles, and removing the decorative rafter tails from the addition should be considered. The refuse collection area adjacent to the west property line should be removed from the proposal as it could become unpleasant for the adjoining property owners. Each of the two single family residences should have their own refuse areas. It should be noted that the applicant is currently in receipt of the ad valorem tax benefit and, as such, the historic dwelling must be kept in good repair and any alterations must be undertaken in an acceptable and appropriate manner. Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. There were none. Mr. Roger Cope, Architect, 80 NE 4tn Avenue, presented a topo of the design. Mr. Adams advised he would like to have a discussion regarding this issue and we also have to give consideration to other residents in the Nassau Street Historic District. We can move forward tonight and we can hopefully move in the right direction (Recommendation page 6). Mr. Cope advised he agrees with all conditions with the exception the continuance and differentiation regarding the new roof lines with the existing roof. We are shifting the house 15 feet to the south, 26 feet to the least, and there will be green space on the corner. We are now coming in with a two (2) story design with a double car parking garage. The existing floor plan of the original house is a 2 bedroom, 1 bath. Our attempt is to make it more livable. We would be more than happy to put another door on the floor plan and validate the rest of the additions we are adding to the first floor. If it is a condition, we are willing to do it. The floor plans are not very traditional; they are a direct result of my client's personal scope and the difficulty in trying not to change the existing house. Mr. Cope presented a slide presentation of the home's exterior. All of the materials will be the same as the historic house. Mr. Cope advised the Board that they have gone to great 13 Historic Preservation Board Minutes • August 17, 2005 expense to design the house, and floor plans, and we would request approval of the plans. Mr. Cope advised that.Mr. Lynch is willing to take off the dormers, and a second area will be added for refuse. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. Greg Kino, Esquire, 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 1700, West Palm Beach, advised Brian Shutt, City Attorney, advised in accordance with the rules you would have needed to apply two or three days prior to this hearing. That process was not followed. Mr. Kino advised that there are Quasi Judicial procedural irregularities. They did not get the plans until August 11, 2005, and have not had sufficient time to prepare for this hearing. We object to not having party status. Single-family zoning allows that when there is a single-family property on a lot the setbacks are improperly applied to this. It was moved by Ms. Schatz, seconded by Ms. Reich, and voted 4 to 0 to move Denial of the Certificate of Appropriateness for 226 South Ocean Boulevard by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet the criteria set forth in LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), The Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments: None B. Report from Historic District Representatives: None C. Board Members: D. Staff: None V. ADJOURNMENT The Board made a motion to adjourn at 8:50 p.m. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for August 17, 2005 and was formally adopted and approved by the Board on Denise A. Valek If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. 14 4 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA MEETING DATE: September 7, 2005 LOCATION: City Commission Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Francisco Perez Azua, JoAnn Peart, John Miller, Jr., and Linda Lake MEMBERS ABSENT: Maura Dersh, Randee Schatz, and Michelle Reich STAFF PRESENT: Paul Dorling, Susan Ruby, and Denise Valek I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Perez at 6:00 p.m. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. No one from the Public addressed the Board on non-agenda items. Chairman Perez read a summary of the Quasi-Judicial Hearing procedures. The Notary swore in individuals for testimony. I1. ELECTION A motion was made by Ms. Lake, seconded by Chairman Perez, and approved 4 to 0 to nominate Mr. John Miller as Vice-Chair. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Mr. Miller, seconded by Ms. Peart, and passed 4 to 0 to approve the minutes of July 20, 2005. IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. 33 Palm Square, Marine Historic District, Gary Rice The item before the Board is for the reconsideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for a change of exterior paint color. Mr. Dorling entered the project file into the record. The subject property consists of Unrecorded Lots 61 and 62 in OR1182P32 and the north 12.5 feet of the parcel lying south of and adjacent to Lot 62, Palm Square, and is situated on the east side of Palm Square approximately 280 feet south of Atlantic Avenue. The property consists of a 1,024 square foot, one-story single-family dwelling and a 682 square foot, one-story guest cottage. Both structures are of CBS construction and were constructed in 1938 in the Minimal Traditional Style and are considered contributing structures within the Marina Historic District. The property is zoned RM (Multiple Family Residential). is one reserva ion oar mu es September 7,2005 -� Alterations were made to the property without obtaining the appropriate approvals. The alterations consisted of a change of the exterior paint colors, the installation of a brick paver walkway and driveway, alterations to the landscaping, and hat racking the two trees at the front of the property. A violation notice was issued for these changes. The applicant stated that the alterations were necessary because of hurricane damage to the property. The applicant appeared before the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) on June 1st, 2005 when the alterations were reviewed. The HPB directed that, in accordance with the Design Guidelines, the brick paver walkway and driveway could be reviewed administratively and that the landscape alterations could be reviewed by the City Horticulturist. However, they instructed the applicant to return with an alternative color scheme for the dwelling and guest cottage. In terms of appearance and material, the paver walkway and driveway are appropriate for the property; however, the City Horticulturist must also review their installation as part of the overall landscape alterations. To reduce the amount of repainting, it was suggested that the color chosen for the main body of the house could be retained while the blue used for the trim and shutters, and the pink and red used for the window frames and doors could be altered. The amended color scheme is now before the Board for review. The following is suggested by the Delray Beach Design Guidelines regarding: Paint: The choice of paint color for the exterior of a historic property is a combination of personal taste, and in historic districts, consideration as to how that paint color will affect the character of the neighborhood. Recommended: The combination of colors selected for wall mass, trim and decorative elements should be complimentary and should avoid disharmony or color clashes. Analysis: The applicant has submitted a color chart for an amended paint scheme; however, it has not been made clear what colors will be used or what parts of the structures will be repainted. When choosing colors for a historic building, consideration should be given to the age of the property, the color of the roof and other building elements, and the color of the surrounding buildings. Simpler structures require fewer colors and, to avoid disharmony, consideration should be given to staying within a single color family and using differing shades to create subtle rather than extreme contrasts. It is also worth remembering that dark colors are more likely to fade and can be difficult to touch up. Mr. Rice advised he and his wife took a tour of the historic district area and took pictures of houses that were more aggressively colored than our. It was our understanding that when we purchased the house we could do the same colors as my wife did on Swinton Avenue. We will make the changes you requested. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. 3 Historic Preservation Board Minutes September 7,2005 Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing. The Board reviewed pictures and new color samples that were supplied by Mr. Rice. Board discussion ensued regarding toning down the colors, especially the fuscia and dark red against the blue plus the white on the door and window frames. Other buildings in this district do not have then intensity of these colors. The direction of the Board was to go with more subdued colors It was moved by Mr. Miller, seconded by Ms. Lake, to postpone this item until the applicant returns with a revised color scheme for the Board to vote on at the October 17, 2005 meeting. B. 275 North Swinton Avenue, Marine Holdings, Claudio Camilucci, Applicant Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of a free-standing sign for 275 North Swinton Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H). Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. There were none. Mr. Dorling entered the project file into the record. The subject property consists of Lot 1, Block 66 of the Stratford Atta Bowe Replat and contains a 1,763 sq. ft. contributing building, constructed in 1926 in the Mediterranean-Revival style. The site contains approximately .26 acre and lies at the southeast corner of NE 3`d Street and North Swinton Avenue in the Old School Square Historic District. On October 2, 2002, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) reviewed and approved a Class V Site and Landscape Plans for the conversion of the single family home to retail, which included the installation of associated parking and landscaping. The conditions of approval have been addressed as mandated with the Board's approval and the improvements are currently being installed. On June 4, 2003, the HPB approved the installation of a free-standing sign, subject to the condition that the proposed color scheme for the sign compliments those colors found on the associated building. A COA request is now before the Board for review and approval of a free-standing sign. The proposal involves changing only the sign face to show a new business name. The previously approved supports, which will be retained to support the sign, measure 4" x 4" and stand 78" (6' 6") high to the top of the decorative finial. The posts will be painted white. The sign will comprise of two parts both of which will be constructed of%" marine plywood. The outer border will be oval in shape with the street number `275' at the top. The outer border will be painted white, the number field will be "Brilliant Blue", and the number copy will be gold. The sign face will be oval in shape with the letters "MH" at the top below which will be "MARINE HOLDINGS" and the telephone number "561.265.4112". The sign face will be white with a "Brilliant Blue" border, the "MH" will be 23K gold leaf on a "Brilliant Blue" field and the remaining copy will be "Brilliant Blue". There will also be a gold line above and below "MARINE HOLDINGS" The copy will be of cutout foam letters, and the overall size of the sign will be 48" (4 feet) across by 32" (2.67 feet) high. The sign will be 4 is one reserva ion September 7,2005 located at the northwest corner of the lot and will be set back 10' from the North Swinton • Avenue right-of-way and 10'from the NE 3rd Street right-of-way in a landscaped area. The Sign Review Committee reviewed and approved the location, design and dimensions of the proposed sign during its meeting on August 19, 2005. The Committee found the sign in compliance with the requirements of LDR Section 4.6.7 (Signs). Positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 2.4.6(H), 4.6.7(D)(2)(a)-(c), 4.6.7(F)(1)(a), and 4.6.7(F)(7), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards can be made. Mr. Camilucci was present to answers any questions regarding the sign. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing. There were no questions of the applicant by the Board. It was moved by Mr. Miller, seconded by Ms. Lake, and approved 4 to 0 to approve the COA for 275 North Swinton Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(H), 4.6.7(D)(2)(a)-(c), 4.6.7(F)(1)(a), and 4.6.7(F)(7) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments: ■ Mr. Andy Katz, 220 South Ocean Boulevard, inquired if the time for an appeal on 226 South Ocean Boulevard has elapsed or was it sent to the City, and if it was filed, can I get a copy. Mr. Dorling advised the appeal was filed, and it will go before the City Commission on September 20, 2005, and you should attend that meeting. A copy of the Appeal can be obtained at the City Clerk's office. • Ms. Aleida Riley, 65 Palm Square, advised a large piece of property located at SE 7th Avenue and SE 1st Street is not being maintained and is an eyesore. She also advised she reported this to Code Enforcement Mr. Dorling advised it takes time to cite the property owner. • Ms. Liz Bold, asked for guidance relative to a renovation on her home relative to a 13 foot variance as she is increasing the footprint of my home by 1,100 sq. ft. for a total of 2,100 sq. ft. She advised it was a hardship due to the fact that when she moved into the home ten years ago she only had one son, now she has three. This addition will not encroach on any property. 5 Historic Preservation Board Minutes September 7,2005 Chairman Perez advised Ms. Bold should go through the process and meet with staff regarding the drawings. If the criteria of the guidelines are followed you have a chance of obtaining the variance. Mr. Dorling advised the variance request should be submitted with the architectural drawings and a site plan for the Board's review. B. Report from Historic District Representatives. None C. Board Members. None D. Staff: Mr. Dorling advised that Staff COA's that have been approved administratively would be added to the upcoming Agendas for informational purposes. Chairman Perez advised he has spoken with Warren in regard to approving shutters administratively. Mr. Dorling advised that we have a matrix that identifies those issues. We can discuss it at the next meeting, and change the process. V. ADJOURNMENT The Board made a motion to adjourn at 6:55 p.m. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for September 7, 2005 and was formally adopted and approved by the Board on Denise A. Valek If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. 6 �d HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD E 1111� :T MEMORANDUM STAFF->REPORT' h 2001 100 2001 Property Owner: Anne Gannon Property Address: 236 Dixie Blvd., Del-Ida Park Historic District HPB Meeting Date: December 21, 2005 COA: 2006-018 ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is the approval of a Variance Request for the location of a freestanding trellis and associated Certificate of Appropriateness for a fence and said trellis for the property located at 236 Dixie Blvd., Del-Ida Park Historic District, pursuant to LDR Sections 2.4.6(J) and 2.4.7(A). BACKGROUND & PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Mission style structure, which was built in 1925, is of wood-frame construction clad with a textured stucco and contains approximately 1,700 square feet. It is considered a contributing structure in the Del-Ida Park Historic District and is currently zoned Residential Office (RO). There are no recent administrative or Board actions pertaining to this property. The current proposal includes the installation of a three foot (3') tall wrought iron fence in the front yard. The fence would be located in the middle of the grass area, approximately ten feet (10') from the edge of the sidewalk towards the residence, and would span the width of the yard from the driveway to the eastern property line, with the exception of the existing concrete path which leads from the sidewalk to the front door. Additionally, the applicant is requesting approval for a freestanding trellis on the western side of the residence, providing an area of shade for an automobile parked in the driveway. The proposed trellis would be approximately sixteen feet (16') in length by six feet (6') in width. It would be a dark stained wood. The submitted photograph exhibiting the type requested depicts a trellis with slightly arched beams in the middle and capped posts, exemplifying the capital of a column. The proposed trellis would be located to the west side of the existing non-conforming structure, placing the freestanding trellis in the setbacks. Therefore, the applicant is requesting approval of a ten foot (10') variance to the side (west) interior setback, allowing approximately five feet (5')from the trellis to the property line. ANALYSIS Design Elements LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1 (E)(8)(f) and (g) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features.The guidelines are as follows: The Board Shall Consider: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(8) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. (f) Rhythm of Entrance and/or Porch Projections: The relationship of entrances and porch projections to the sidewalks of a building shall be visually compatible with the prevalent architectural styles of entrances and porch projections on historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. (g) Relationship of Materials, Texture, and Color: The relationship of material, texture, and color of the facade of a building shall be visually compatible with the predominant materials used in the historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation suggest the following: ❑ The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. ❑ New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. Fence The proposed three-foot (3') tall wrought iron fence is simple in design and therefore appropriate for the Mission style of architecture on the property. It appears to be used for decorative purposes only and is not of concern. However, the proposed location of the fence may not be • appropriate. The proposed location is in the middle of the front (north) grass area, approximately ten feet (10') from the edge of the sidewalk towards the residence, and would span the width of the yard from the driveway to the eastern property line, with the exception of the existing concrete path which leads from the sidewalk to the front door. In this location, the fence would appear awkward and incomplete. The fence should perimeter the front green space along the existing sidewalk on its southern edge and wrap around the green area, along the edge of the driveway to the west. Additionally, the fence could add a further sense of completeness by running the perimeter of the driveway along the westernmost edge, up to where the proposed trellis posts would be located. Trellis Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4 (H)(4)(I), trellises may extend to no more than five feet (5') from the side of the principal building or extend more than two feet (2') from the front or rear of the principal building into the required setback. The existing structure is non-conforming, as the setbacks for the area zoned RO are twenty five feet (25') in the front and fifteen feet (15') on the side interior. The structure sits twenty four feet, eight inches (24'8") from the front property line, and thirteen feet, eight inches (13'8")from the side interior property line. The proposed wooden trellis for the side (west) of the dwelling is to be approximately sixteen feet (16') by six feet (6'), the size of the applicant's automobile which is a standard sized four-door car. The depth of the chimney is two feet (2'), leaving approximately eleven feet eight inches (11'8") to the side interior property line. With the width of the proposed trellis at approximately six feet (6'), the Page 2 of 4 Trellis Variance and COA remaining space would be about five feet eight inches (5'8"), requiring the approval of a variance (see Variance Analysis below). The applicant has stated on the application that the proposed trellis would not be attached to the existing dwelling. On completion, the trellis is to be stained, giving it the appearance of a dark wood. Detached trellises are appropriate to historic structures and being that it will be detached, its installation is reversible without causing any damage to the property. The design, however, should be modified to a simpler style as a condition of approval. For example, the beams should span straight across without any curved elements and the post caps modified to appear less heavy and simpler. Conclusion Based on the analysis above, positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), 4.5.1 (E)(8)(f) and (g), and 4.3.4 (H)(4)(I), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation can be made, subject to conditions. Variance The criteria for analyzing the variance request is provided in LDR Section 4.5.1(J)(1) which states that a variance is necessary to maintain the historic character of property through demonstrating that: a) A variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare. b) Special conditions and circumstances exist, because of the historic setting, location, nature, or character of the land, structure, appurtenance, sign, or building involved, which are not applicable to other lands, structures, appurtenances, signs, or buildings in the same zoning district, which have not been designated as historic sites or a historic district nor listed on the Local Register of Historic Places. c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of existing ordinances would alter the historic character of the historic district, or historic site to such an extent that it would not be feasible to preserve the historic character, of the historic district or historic site. d) The variance requested is the minimum necessary to preserve the historic character of a historic site or of a historic district. The applicant is requesting a ten foot (10') variance to the side interior setback to be adjusted from fifteen feet (15') to five feet (5') in order to accommodate a freestanding trellis to be located directly on top of an existing driveway. The trellis, while it will require footings due to wind-load requirements, is an open structure and would therefore not impact the adjacent property by creating the feeling that a full structure is abutting right up to the property line. Additionally, a trellis could be installed and subsequently removed without impacting the adjacent properties or the historic character of the historic site or district. Therefore, being that special conditions and circumstances do exist because of the property's original site planning in 1925, positive findings can be found with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(J)(1). ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the COA and Variance Request for 236 Dixie Blvd. by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.5.1 Page 3 of 4 re .s anance an (E)(4), 4.5.1 (E)(8)(f) and (g), 4.3.4 (H)(4)(I), and 4.5.1(J)(1) of the Land Development Regulations and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, subject to conditions. C. Deny approval of the COA and Variance Request for 236 Dixie Blvd. by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Sections 4.5.1 (E)(4), 4.5.1 (E)(8)(f) and (g), 4.3.4 (H)(4)(I) and 4.5.1(J)(1). of the Land Development Regulations and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. RECOMMENDATION By Separate Motions: Certificate of Appropriateness Move approval of the COA for 236 Dixie Blvd. by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.5.1 (E)(4), 4.5.1 (E)(8)(f) and (g) and 4.3.4 (H)(4)(I)of the Land Development Regulations and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, subject to the following conditions: 1) That the fence be located on the perimeter of the front green space along the existing sidewalk on its southern edge and wrap around the green area, along the edge of the driveway to the west and consideration be given to placing the fence along the westernmost edge of the driveway, meeting with the proposed trellis posts. 2) That the trellis be of a simpler design, with straight beams, no curved elements, and simpler post caps. 3) That drawings be submitted to Staff reflecting the final design prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. Variance Move approval of the Variance Request for the side (west) interior setback to be placed five feet (5') from the property line for the property located at 236 Dixie Blvd. by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 4.5.1(J)(1).of the Land Development Regulations and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, Report Prepared by: Amy E. Alvarez, Historic Preservation Planner Attachments: Location Map, Historical Survey, Site Photographs, Fence Specifications, Trellis Photograph. Page 4 of 4 DEPARTMENTOOFSTATE FLORIDA MASTER SITE FILE • Division • and r Archives.dsMana History Site inventory Form FDAHRM and Records Manay«nant802= =OS-HSP.3A. R.v.3-7e 1009=.= Site Name Site No. 830= = .Survey,Qatel 820= ;A Address of Site: 216 Dixie Boulevard, Delray Reach ;...:' J_" 905= Instruction for locating " • r,V��..IS 1-1/I Izilnr.•"�813='•=1 ? Location: Del—Ida Park 10 subdivision name block no. t o •, , 868= = t:- Palm Beach lot na County: . Owner Site: .:..;• "•'��'1~2.-1 808---43 Name: Robert F & Grade R. Scott -•- -.,-:-. Address: " • '' :':I..ti.�-; r�i 736 TIiYi P Rnri1 Pvard, fPl ray Be.n - -•. Type of Ownership Private 848= = - Recording Date :May 1, 1986 832= - Recorder: -_-'.y`,.;u i _ ---• --- -• -- - _ -►"l i ;ii;D'sv�.;'; Address: Smith _7; - Name & Title: Sanford HPBCPB Condition of Site: Integrity of Site: 818_ _ Original Use Residence'~' �- 838= _ =) Check One Check One or More ;.Y .:wk.:a- `, ; :• O: t• (:A; ❑ Excellent 883== le Altered Present Use Residence 850= _, , Good 858== Dates:• Beginning, " 1925 ".844= == ❑Unaltered 858== Culture/Phase`' 1-` -- - - 840= _:'s. ❑ Falr 883=_ SI Original Site 858=a Period - -'.3 Q Deteriorated 0 Restored 845" 883 a ( )(Date: x )838== ;:-Y.: . :.t 5' ❑Moved( )(Date: )( )858== - rr.f. . ;'.:mo t :: .. a, - ' y: NR Classification Category:. :. 'Building • • a.ir; .• !_o: Threats to Site: 916= _•_. Check One or More )( )878== 0-Transportation( )(• )( )878:: ❑ Development( K x )878== ❑ FIB K' )878:ale'; ❑ Deterioration( K X )878== 0 Dredge( )( ❑ Borrowing( x ::;x. )878== x )878= ❑ Other(See Remarks Below): 1 :',I ": H(. t.:_ ,�(? ( t";s r";'t;',.:? . 878== Areas of Significance: ' " Architecture 910= = - Significance: `i i • • f _ 911 = = \le. t -) ARCHITECT Unknown 872= = - BUILDER Unkriovm - - 874= = STYLE ANDIOR PERIOD - ------ .---.-- -----:---- MV771.511--) _ 94= • PLAN TYPE .___ ___Reccangular 966= =' EXTERIOR FABRIC(S) Stucco over wood 854= = STRUCTURAL SYSTEM(S) Wood frame • 856= = . PORCHES Rear, screeni.d . 942= = FOUNDATION: Concrete 942= = ROOF TYPE: Flat 942::-... = SECONDARY ROOF STRUCTURE(S): 942= = CHIMNEY LOCATION: • 942=. = WINDOW TYPE:___Awtang 942= = CHIMNEY: 882= = ROOF SURFACING: Tar and Gravel 88_2= = ORNAMENT EXTERIOR: 882= = NO.OF CHIMNEYS one• 952= = NO.OF STORIES one. 950= = • NO.OF DORMERS zero 954= = Map Reference(incl.scale &date) Delray Beach, topographic. 1.24:000 1962, 1983 809= = Latitude and Longitude: • 800= = Site Size(Approx.Acreage of Property): LT 1 833= = Township Range Section LOCATION SKETCH OR MAP N south east "' al .46 41 16 812= = Z / • ,Z UTM Coordinates://e:\ 890= = 4 }--\ L4 Zone Easlung Nofitnng N_ E_ Sth Terr. I i1 ..• . 1 f Photographic Records Numbers 860= = i . 1. ,a. Contact Print • T- YT � l . Z :- le ,______ N.E- 11TH ST. I a l,- l ) -1 [ • N.E. 10TH ST. p — IIIIII N.E. 9TH ST. BIM w o - a Z �- N-W. 8TH S_T. GEORGE BUSH BOULEVARD PQ GEORGE BUSH BLVD LL.1 rIVk- NP . , aulZ P . < N.E. 7TH Si. S% , ( , :?;' I = Oil I , e‘‘J.'ia Li MI ,-. ■. i I '':�i.'2t,. N.E. 7TH .., N.W. 6TH ST. �... I- D 0 N.E. 67H ST. , D ACURA MI ( ,c o OF Iii �c� P� ]♦ mDELRAYf `i I BEACH - 3 P ` .�-, O Ocn` O Z p ` N.E. 5TH TERR. Q- I N.E. 6TH CNS L___) Mill k, N.E. TH CT. 1 -I • Lim ` PUBLIX N.E. I 5TH ST. k• & .,. c., „<„,-,-(-) — 1 ci TRINITY N.E. 5TH ST. MN 11 r r LUTHERAN _ _ z= I �jvi ,,; WAL- vi Z \GREENS LAKE IDA RD N.E. 4TH ST. ` > POST a .>CASON \ < OFFICE r > - 3 a METHODIST = _ CHURCH 1- z c z � a 1 J ~ Q Q � ci D_ i. i -I■ Li z z z a o Z. 1 N -mm� 236 DIRE BLVD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FL PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT J -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM888 Ot ?s- 'b f r :s.a. ` • 'a yr z's :.r S � s".a-� ` ���'��. i 4 • / 1112' Il/ lt � 5'-Co r/c. . iv.4 c.l'._ 50 - - ' ! q�83' Fzvao- e " - -oao 5/0.' • 3¢P'/-'e \ .�v Pov ,. 'Ci V ldiT /8353 4. rl ci iitA4&L vaOs�.: ei ./ /. E�+�"�gr� 41 o .1 ',41:'i 11_ / 9T2,Py L., to K/DoD- `v -7',.?i ,, f/ .f,r1E N}}i ,, 1i`-,=;71 M .-ST/ec 2 t P V. ;=! tt . - \ ai . I ' Se,,PEEA/EO h • '� ll Pofe/1 Ai/Av \ --/37j? . /'-`te 1 vie( id •� 1,151-�P///!/E ,C c%vE'S 7 (` 7'/ r / � J ---/- � / � � �— �7 y r IL,. o �' 3/i',f, ,/,./,' t C 3' . / Cro,eY I 1 /4000-/,694/E - . I STvCen Al"--)' 1 ; if/itd/A/6 "` Po!/EZ oyI 1�, DLO 0 • FDf/,VG P//D,f/e& /41,; EY/Pe'FE.vcF o�1 SB leer/ efdcFTd 4 . i ;% OA!c/.f/E ) / 'eel" c/,V 5 f Foaf/o s%iRD,/,PoO-""Ye of ' SO,4' I '`PDCE- iv/l:reior4953-3 'h' 4v6 ` _/)i- �_%;_' DESC/e/Pr/D,V: eor8, Ae'ce'/D, OEC-y0A PVA; ACC'o,e0/,vc ry / ' This drawing not PC9T T,YE.QE4F,eCe.0,lvc o /.v P694i BDo// 57, ",9GE' S Z 4FT,r'E valid without an P//BL/c "e-e6,QOs of P,¢CAT BE.9CAl co#.4',', . At'''4/.9. 1 embossed seal. Bod.//D,9.eV 5- ,Q14--7/Fo/e, AA//f/e /f/f. o'4WMe c/ j i; DATE c'-1k(/4/.'9/'SCALE /11-7,2'a' `FIAT BOOK No. 9 'PAGE No. SZ O'BRIEN, «SUITER O'BRIEN, INC. _ ENGINEERS—LAND SURVENIORS— LAND PLANNERS 2801 NORTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY,DELRAY BEACH,FLORIDA 33444 278-4501 732-32 -7��\ GL`,- T/f7FDT0= P.P//DE,!/l/i9/Not1E,110.I7.1,9GC C>,/,f/l./ DE[//lr g-TirfTGE.P-.4•/ \\' _ n'w•2. 3�1'7//& //t/J P.gdc't'F�/.r/p, /il�:;,fr,,UO AM""A' Gtl//vW,e \. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the plat shown hereon Is al true and correct representation of a survey of 1 JOHN N.S the lands described hereon made in accordance with thb minimum technical standards for land survey- Inp In the state of Florida as set forth by Chapter 21Ht-y8 Florida Administrative Code. Ks NO. FIEIO BOOK ,2QQ PAGE NO. 7 ! ORDER NO.099; lk 'l . .` t - guests'gazes across your yard.Their v a yy4, a other function is to provide support _" \. � :_ and an attractive spot for roses and \v% !.F t i F.`i•: I�t �' �" ,• other types of climbing plants-even - n.. •=,.‘% ' ' ✓% �• /P F l't 3- '_/ Ise �` fruit and vegetables-to ow. arZ- • `` ' :. _ }-r' `' �\\ � '�I' ��J i�f ;_ � Usuallymore substantial than an 1� 1 ,. z : , a ;; I arbor but not as confining as a ti ;� ,�/ _ :, `rs J , gazebo,a pergola maybe as simple as .:11 �, ,. H ` i q an overhead structure attached to the S' i ". u;', \ I'.",••It;•7;.„' I'-',.!';7-1(.--. 6C.)`x, - -'i_, .5.,.-••,,•2,.4-,,,,,, -..,41_",: "' ' ' 9r i r ivy, back of your house to cover a deck 1.hr+� , , F k �,'' - •F I .. U%� fr.. .. i 4 pivotk.,�,,, z J.'',„�fl4! t e Or it t befreestanding migh a grand t� t•, ;.,.- 't� ,/ " 1 y- - , „? / -1- • • ,. ;f- structure that is the main focal point .� of a yard.Pergolas are especially ..S 1 i - — effective over paved areas,such as - y�L l.: I = ry } :, 1� Ts j„ paths, courtyards,and patios. v-�i�. If you are shading a sitting or btdining area, consider wind and sun patterns,especially during summer • months,and try to take these A Gently arched variables into account in the beams topped ometimes,especially when the hot structure's design.Trellises or materials like with 2x2s form a shade-giving summer sun beats down,it's nice to lattice can be included on one or more sides of 1 roof over a have it made in the shade.And that's a a pergola,adding to the tunnel effect and freestanding - 8x8-foot deck. primary benefit of adding a pergola to your blocking unwanted views:If you are starting Lattice panels landscape-you can create your own shady from scratch on your garden design at a new enclose the lower sides. retreat. home,a pergola can be the element that sets the Pergolas can also be beautiful features in stage for the rest of your landscape design their own right,connecting one garden area to drama.If your landscape is already well • another,dividing the landscape into separate developed,a pergola could be the element that outdoor rooms,framing a view,or leading ties it all together. 16 FIND YOUR INSPIRATION rl., -;eitse&-_,,-011,51 0 )„.4,,,,,,,,....- /z4,i„,,„,,!..,...!--, . ,-1-, --, „:,:wyx-.1 •1: -"n' -- t'+` ..£. a 7. _ , , ,,,-„, l..,r, t, r 1 ,. .*i(, f.`S i. _ Browse other products: Aluminum Fence I Wrought Iron I Driveway Gates I Automatic Gate Openers I Horse Fence I Chain Link Screen Wrought Iron Fence ems:. _ .•,.-:.r - __ ... !AAA-t#11�l�11�#� 5!ft 111[IIBIB .s 4 1*ItawwnisleRR 1 k 1{��A IlffiMitl1�wl O zuglitut wrd. .._ , ;tilt+s+s.tt EER I 1 11111111111M1.111 ; , • 04OP tt v l'ilii*R' .11,, ',,,4 Residential Estate Wrought Iro t011111111111 ®®, Section:8 feet wide. Rails: 1"X .5" 1/8"punched channel. Pickets: .5"X 18 ga. square tubing;4.36"• spacing. Finials:4.25"safety ball welded. Finish:Black powder coated. A� ¢ r.I; s 1, Warranty: 10 year fence; 1 year finish. �1 •R � P RPt= 01 5`H Commercial Classic Wrought In Section:8 feet wide. httn://www.fence-denot.com/shonnow/wroughtiron/comnlexind/index.shtml 10/18/2005 s ,sp`< 4. }-mot v Asti a s -r r tic -. - ''I4}ice '' K z2S.- "� ��y�,� •.mjT^4 - - _ 'gw at • s • ��, _:.� ! _ 3` - Y — ; -it— •-,T,- ,ss,g-^.4f • - - - r*i A� .> m z-3. M "ate' y - u `L nn z3L L\-yae 3L`t-b r _ ,I I • °4.1: Aar ' .R o e. , w _ - i a ' 1 - 1 r— 4 }.s • _ _ - -'-- 7 -1 1 i .1 a aria y. ti -r. \ 1. ' ,j: c • tropl-,:' sti • • .Kc win G�,�',-. ;.M _ - - A • _''' '.-,..,e..:...-, c' .,• - ' .- - ,,- „.�,s ,, --a'r•�`.`. ..-cam;-. 3 t. • ,.,,,„.,„,.,_.....,„., , . ,•-•' ,-',,,'-..'-:;.,:':7-''•''":''':-.'-'.'",.7' ' ' e\ e-I2L.70..ili P1--k-- CO e°1a2--- e:51— ,..,-, .,-,.:,,..„, ..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. ,• ,,, •':,......„ .„,„!:.,.,;.„,,...:11:7?".;7..",.;•;',.,;27..-.,., -...,,,,-',.. ' .• -,. , „. . ,,.i.,,, :,,....•,r,-.., .,,-,,• ,,, , ,. ,: . ' .:%•.''--,•.'',-.,,...• •,,,;,, .,•,;":. :-,---;.• ..3,‘,. ..,:--,,•,-„:).•,:•,.., .. - ,,, .:. ,:,,,.• •,. ' :,:,-, , . • - 0_.L__Ni.1: K-1•E_ 2i/ld y6ttE_ $•,;•,,,,, :,!..i;,,,-, 4:,':.44 - '.."'!' '- ' :%',! ,'. i: "''i,' ‘`" — ' - • - . ;;--- - ,.' , : -- k-`1,.)e-- 1,--' ) i ,.t.'-,:',440 ' • •,.,.,. ,...:?•, ' . : .. '-'''-'441,.''.t-;',":',1,''."„1'., . ''' Kle -- -v) ;'' ..,,....,,,I,' .., ,e1,;. .-:4;,,,,,,,,P, • ..'il';,..' ....,..1,,,,,,', ''-',,,.. ' .,. ' , , . ...: ,s,':...4.: . ;' .*1.114, .;','`,Al : ''..,'•,,..,,-..::;;,- ,- , 1 , . . .. . . ,, .....„, , . .. . . . . , . .., . . .. ..... .,.,..- ., . . ,.. „ • • — . . _.: -,,,,,,-t!.:„,,,,.,..,.: ..,..,,,t,,,;.:il . ; =-.:,• • 7..,,',.•:'-.„'-‘,.-;';.„'.,....',:, i . ' •,--• '..• ''••.'.•• .-:',...P.•:::';',.'..' .. ifil:1•.''`,,":::,Y., .- 1•; . : .•'•'•''''•.'••1.4. -. ••••-;'''' .. , • i '--' '•: . ' A . ''''1,...,,,—.4-roo.VV,',-,1,1;to-,-\.;''' ." .,;:ti'''':;'':'s';'.•.:-.."-';'?"-'-'; ,,....to...."'••4.:'t,I ) . .- --""; ..4•rj;i''''',.-:'4":. '''..... .! '."1„f,r;7 7.,'. , ' ‘ .001L: ''' • .',/•1•,'•11;37,•-6','!Zi,r,lk:11•Ml.t,d, "Z'l ' , .... . • ,•,..., , ':!..4,41,•11k3i'.:?.,4'i',,;',.i;`: .. - ..--... . .,-- .‘, . •• ; .,...,... . • , , . 1 ,, ----- ...,:,,,,,i . I ,....„ • . ', ,,,,,,, , . ..... , > . , ....,_ ,:•,,,,:i..,:;,,,, .•.---,:-I.--.:•,„--,,,&—e-Tio, .... .•,.,.: 'r"..,4;.:'•::"^•'.N,• .7'''',,s7T:.'1••;',I1,.,,',•'.1„•:,.vr.,,,,,''' ''' '1 e,,,,,,,,,,,,, .,.,, . . . ., ..,.•. ‘,.- ,.. 14 , . • • ... ,--- „...,,i,-...,,, 4.4„..,,. . , . ,>. , ,, : '1,..4,.t' '''...„it'''!'-:',' :P ,.'',... ..,i.-..- ,....':',,....'-,..... , . ''''' '''' ' '' " "-"•,:-''' ".', • 4 .,..,-,...2,,,,i,:, . . ... CC • , ::-. vi—n. ,i"'„--: -: ',..,. :::„,,-,: ,.,...:.., ;,,,,,.i."..-4i,',„*..,,,,,,,,.,..,;.y r• )• _7:-:- I l. .+. . • • _, .-.. II • / • — , V't. •• )i 1r ,, ,.,,,,,,o,:#4 - , :,„, ;"1.,`'•,,,-,' -;‘, ';C:. '- .,,'••.', 1x ,I.%, \,/,..1, , .,,,,, ,,•,,, „likr:-.„,, ,. . ,;,?, .. ,• ,, 4 • .•,„. .„ .• . f.,,f,„ N,.. .., ,p,,,(,,,• • ':::,...1.''.-„,!''',.-.:c71-'. • --„...,:-.;,,,..1.','. - . ` - , ... ....,,,,,t4.,... ,z.a.,;,,,‘,4", •., ,Itt,.',.: •,.,,,_.if,";":-.,',P,.,...,,,,\, .'I‘'••••• (3, . sa, %,,%._klb V*,..N.. ''-.). ,,i7*-"-...';1.,' ..,., ' , \ ',1 , ' , *,,,d7;.',,PVI.:',.. ---,,,,:,4,,,,,P,',,,r,i' :':,...,,,,,,/,',44'..•'' '. . ..E',.'•'. ''),\‘‘..‘ 11:,.N 11/4''',',kV',l's‘', s' "'" x "N.:\ '..,06W.11.H...e..-''',".;t'''.,,,0.. ‘..‘;',''•-2;= :iti' .-- 7:.°,4,s.e:,.'•,,,,,,,,s-, ..i i`- , Nt''k P.,16, Ii.,'kik Ik.\'t••11.,-\_ _,,v,..,...„..._„1., --1.•••.--,..;. - P••s,', • • • -..,„1,. ."7; .-1',,,,Y+"4,•;•4,..',': . '1' •,111' -•*:`,W1‘..i. .,..‘,1t,'N1\14N\16k. •,,,t00.•111,111411Pe' .''''• '''' \ek.Ye\ b•a\. I \• _,..,E,A,••••••••„:.,,,• •, •..4;1;$'7;4:1,•:1;;;,•,,. ''' ,...•.•,,,,P.V.7,,,11•',1'g,';"/,•••' ....:. ,44`;•"•,,,,,,•:),•7•.•,J,ri- . : -,o...-•' ik IN,...".I." \\lt,,\‘,4-,\‘•;P:--e-- • t..,,,,.•.-,i.;,i':'.:•,teY.,t,...„..:,Y:;•/.,;'i',±;."'.I'.O,n:''','-,'';,'4'•X.••.:-;";;;,,,?'.1•1,,i':,*';"',t,i.",,iAo.•1•:''';''',1',1.,'4i''''.'.7.;i'"!2,:,°'...,;..' ,.,•.,,'' M;cICv'*,1,,,..;„'7.,,.O...,;4,:1,.,,4,,,;"',:0...:• - ,..'._•......•._•",•-.-.',-.0• --'--'-_"7-•. ?. 1 4 , 1 ,..:;•:-,''!-._'' ._-1'1,'.'..!'i.‘'.':).,;,'...-.,.,.-'„',.„'•+-•-•',,'i•.'m,.,:•'*.'•.•i''',...' ...:.,.i.....-.:•..,.. .A,to,.. -• __. ,. .11.. • ., , .4 . ..,. '''' •';''''''.'. ':,17-,p. rfk A •... -a, •^7.7.7.?'777' ,. ,,......• •".',....;24'• r•',. ..,, „,,,,,,, ,, • $•••;, Al • •=.•-. . --40,•-..V.,-L'N0,' ..,,,,Te.„,,,,•Act,::_,:_-_,-.-r.•,, ,:i.::,,,-.;';.:;,;.;!ifv.,-:,:i.,.:;„,',, ,, ..-'.. , .. ,(I. 1.,..I. I ,C.., :. 'illr'.'°'•i'•• '''''''' :,5':*1, III •,:: ' • 1' ' .4'..,',', ,,, . •, ... . '.,,r, • . • 1 . l‘..,..., '," .. . „ .. _,, . . , • ,. ".';'. '''.':"!:r., I:i:.... it4Rel..4,14ipi-ltig.:. ..';', '.',."'''.::„'-.' .:•••• 1 . , ',:',•-, ,,,,, . , . 1 . ' ur,-, ,,,...,,,,,, •,: P„....;•,,,o,,,,,,,t,,,,,,,,k,„ ,3,,,.;..4,0,,,,,,,,,p.,,:,,,,ri-,'„„,... , ,''',',.'2: :. re.".... N •.:^ . 1 . , ' -Ai,,,bot,.:1,••••-i-4.1%.q„.144..", .1,,, •!:. : .• • •.• . .. •. \' '' ') •I. , , .n,,,,,,,...; ..v...-4-,.;..,r,,. 1,-.-,,,i,t.:,....,...;.,,..i•-.! 1.4.,...,0,4•?A/i'''':.4-.1'.'" `.:'Y. '.:' ..'.., • ... • '..•" . `..-'•,.!. - •-• •,.. . ; ' •-. ,• . . . , ., • -',. .. • • - ,• • • . • • . . ...•,..,... - ..,.. . . .. , • � „. Ate` .rt • f .a . a a. �'S., ,, fi•y '',." �.. .. ,T " s, . . • aa .• .te . •;N„ , ' ' ; • ra• •• t1 a a r » • 3` t x '". R." r . • • • • 3 • f,� �� ' . ., •.fw x�.' 6 .... *,, { •, . "R R - s�x � � r . . •,,<�"} ♦% c � @ 3 i 1 •4 � 1 ��t@ �rt 1 * ,r , r A • • Y x q , . 1 Fr Z • a `d ' R edy ' • �' :•. ' ..t { 4ye, 3; • n «} x a i x k4 .`$'�,� � ,�,m by "`� .'?p:•. .$6 ' 3' � , �' � ,K tf'. 4e ' Jr+•a y{' ".•.•'� ,�` � `, 3y ih . � t , ' i«`yb;^-'i%. .e• ,,}•ht � # c i S a v ry 'E '1 • 1 • • • "z ,.A ,�'".�'..z, EMIT ;4:- % Y S a .I' •' y, •t . `t ��3 R� � \`,a iTt• i .. L ._a ;t,..~. •�•" � ►Y,h�,:t \ ,• �_•._.. k x '1. • "�r t -t:'a' 1 ' ,,� + .F�s + g Y�, •`$ � ''`F"fir gc. S1 ♦ ' yr rt y.. ��,N y R •✓ yam' t • ••„t• �, ti :. 1.1-"•" '` «a. pia+" .=,x, r . z .,,y .{ t` .. ��,• • w N+ '« S HY• [ "4 rn', �� ,.. s". k'..r. .^4A-' 1 I.. . ••4'']a?x"` s.r••7•7 Ws�• • a' .�' ..:v t1� ,'aI ;,.F Y., ,- Ff '� M ' �•.E..#S.. ,M,"e �r,a`�wm,»wM'y'x•""dam' �".r.;„, ."�.:Rb`*�"`t,w�E...)w�.q.y w h'3�r,`mo- .'S•+i'" �� ? ~ ."r ! '4t !>.f" •ruJ " ,+•' • • .„. . , ,...,:,,.. .4.,4„. ,„ • 14' • •• „„ „i z ^k_ . «, ;".' �'4`u 'r ,, re .'• : ?a e..T ,y t.a U� i .. ,.e _ �`. a r• � .. t. s �av x:• 5 ' 1. . �}.� , �.y: 7& �• ^' w �s a :sue «, ^ x1 � .q,1d d ♦` y,5 a'�.'"• .. m' `4:.„ ,f., uma � etv+ ae T-•� �.( R . ,t r " « t F � � ,. .i • ;,•. ►.Y.-�, ;.�.�•4 '• • ° 4 ^rr v"�•,,,tt ` i"@ a. e ., „ . " `rLms ` a.. �� „ ,' x i �C „ n F '"^ "�'q r.y&•k. a� x T R .& - ,n q. .R^` q .$s.'n, "a. . . R r A " ;"':t ' w • .,z L", „ — � 'wa,,Zezm e E, t .' ' 4 '* ik?:i,.� .• i ' v"r :,' r p ;•" ' '44;• ;w `' . �': ; a-17 : ; r •„".t '�` ;- Y a • ,' r,0 :r r ' a »"'--.2 ,-4 e; � ' 4 Y'- :'Sin , ,.t� •�e i.`dr �; ` s:+ + '+ ' , `- L .�"4 .tom s.. ; i. , '. + +�'' k Pr .: r �, . ^ a `„ Y -- -15,. ` � i- -,-;.,;'' "ti' t �" � ,d •, .. "`; r.„."A• 0. ''K. qe •l ' } 1`i � 4• a-.6 ' u. . 5 ir .a 1ur ` ' =`.* '. ,....,,,,.., • • • • • r•g • • � �T ` cy�»� � .'.z-, ..L. ,,. Ai i _t. r x'. «-:xc "" rta. . tiA , r"` �MN. s ' x\!°�ii'' :. 11,:t � t • i` .Y ` i '• `T>i ; y.�, ,.rw " ' -s ' r . , ' ..r ^ t` ,��5''„dlt . ;tt _ . x a �ii y .i • at :yyr` ' -•*';^'''''' '' �iAE Y . K .a%`.".T. $' , • k'� `»'�9,,k `>'•z, • R �t, +� 'k � 2 Rih .. i i t ti i � 'r" r t L��s: ,`f4 f v^S • 1 • .`P,, • S sa .r,�•4.a r a �x; t ," i 'tr ..1t , ``, . CV;^. t =�ki.;i I 1t ` ,w 8KkI "5'Te f, t, c •. •i4 t t3 G a. e' !„ ,'�• x \ s.1 ,0,� s ax av � a`"" .� S Y'h' ` r ice. .. "� �Shi .< �..� r $t x 1 ,�� Sxr �e Y, ti, dust, 4 .s1 .4-. • r . ,:. t aV`s% �Lw,\ ,. 1 'V' v`Sxk . � x y x 44' t, " tt ;.a— .. ik .. �" s;r. '? c� ,. " mid s Kl 1 ..^' ,, �` i ''.. • s�,F i, 'ta2° c `T i * ✓.,,. �,. s ! .. .. �.: k: k t , �3� h 1 YT .l E Y.Y '� �� .t'S 4 t • d t .l. . v�•�x. . L.i. i i .,dM t d``ar>.!", . N���c �� .+ e i r.,, 4w: k. L Y^ =:r.'�.: . %. • "": �1;r" s`yt pa x a s S `, tom,. .k„�,La "+:'�. •.•. i J • • �^ �,3 h �, 5�a L � s�� v '� �`� °"�'Y� • w� ` € s t t •ti i . .5 • £ '�•«L a a.. sn �^ srY .,�;� ,'�L �,'' t n fr t c. is y�YY?* ti,7 "•- _ € a \� ° i " .tom. ," a, •a ' .. . LMw > �� �>v^,� � • 't kfiki•a i '�. y j M y • `��� i. aYS T.,.. •ev.• .. • • .-�` "; 2 E > r L ak -•. .r R P a. Y+,.�qm,, i- ! �*''.�L r d T' �^+.^ s ^c�vi • a rr L 3�k ,. `;`�5d" R "i�R"r.d•"C ^1 �r,/i.._ . 'C' .. �.. 'v:'. 'L>i. 4m<. e� �`, [ : 0s.,:i 4i:`. .1. . x € F t , > ,�s:),. � :1.' :.i. ''. $� `•��-.�' • - 'fix i yk r.+''t : Ri 3'.£ "t'4 .Y .r.n i a• • ; y V. "* .r' ' • '� .,a, m' e.^'k', �t :f Ys ',mk � 'a'K e'}'"' } € t▪ t. k�+^.Ni •C,. + 'a.•�•y"-� �'• �. �"W . ,t `: v'3 j r� s^�' 04 , � z. txa d^€ 5 ..:. M ,g•)Z"f. S �•.``• .ti �:• ��`� .k , „ •'r' . t c • .,04' i'�!'°i�stk� ,r . kc'.+ $yi `vs�r��,�"„ � a,� :y" • -• • °•*...:ram: :,r. ..'� . = s, . ' ,k,„t ``�. ea '� .L�+',e�t. �v., s^"�,v x i z r i i c Y.""'.u ? rj� f'rb " •. ,;.•. i c iy�Ca .3 •k.r '' ' SLR. Est ,r r a'+' .: .4`� S y -K', �Aaqlf H' r •�' 44 1 -•�.r•}. �� tiAr . a €to a €� eat` s � . s 1x ] s .. 9 5? m r^ § ,, L e6x da»'' F alr .44 is au L°�av 4+4 . .• pX "t• 't'4 i' S 4 iE� E• : '� � X • 'A" ',^ .'t t ;hs �,'hk ', "`i,.*y �' { S}, s S'ir z i, aj w ti.. 45S 3t. — t'ati ''i' '� wra,°� ° 'i «%+ >.+ > aTek `�,2ri.'4„` � x" ivk h x3 'z'� Y x '>, t 14' a t "`twi t. ^5,sx z A. • 5 �c "a A-t. '& ha �i's t L o •v4"a 3 TM rw s . •• 3 - • ��' '' "�`.+r as, k y� ;f Lw i„"',��s t 3 ,.yam L ash ,. Yr. .• ys.+K" /� 'a ®" : ,�* i .yf5d t' .„ `i J+ ° 3 xa� �yLc s e'� s . . • ax t� y� Y�tsw s' <' tit ix g��^ 44r '' s.• t s''. ' °x 3 ¢� ^ yy 7('+ys �.��,�I .,�cy -' ��k " z�' ..✓'`' '^' +r�"'':...y.,...k s'z. RLi�sk`.�` yak`ram,yt�y .«'"""� v• 't� q',`i',� •.�f d 1 ,11111 '.4 s'34-'ka.: .44 �S. � ,4•l'+� 'f 5 1.'t" -' '' . 'x '�s�' x�i WI', si 'k ;?�. .,.� "''1_r +, + '� i gty �t �� L.'1 '11-4 r .- a b Yam^ •„"�! .. _. .>,y c� $140gt €yr :Z g' i. a, a � , 1. t tC,t +,r i, f. , 4.:'::,,i:"g:;':',v. ."., sp�,j,M w»l ��*IJ. },r j ,, •''Y`u, 'C▪ , i �?.+ .' x' ♦ 4 � ��' w :r�; k q"s, s�' >nlL ' ' ? ,jam ." ...+ " ,r'1•,,• • ....iv "^a.M.,:.tu.......v...„a►..,..". . as,c L�+..,._a'ih€ rx�.Y@r.wA.+S-'°.•i�'.'.•" t:s^w . c .., / ,i 7.. �t . t! r ma , t r .t . 5 " - 'Y>� .•..cam-� .. -.Ir.'''. �' "`' .`"."' ` •F::.J.,,�,!� -awL ,' �� c�3om,"� ... r.'� 5 ^+•^*� x� • e"', '„ #• t . • +�'w .itfi. 'tw '' ~ •l' ^ /.4f„', t . M.. y,€" x S w 3r, ,r .t :� .,•F 4„r!!` j F 1� s a ; ' A5 ' t .ax' w3...._ w+ •w•.�C�4.. . •.=t _ ..�..• i� J; t I / } y�>�,-.. 'f)' ', • .,"'� '$rW.a '% t , 'fi• r ''- II . ""= ;� Lr- f +".""*` :,.i•' t': '++ / �r '1' fr. 1, �,.• t. �;•+;,•+C;r`.4r s /,At `•�.: � • ;•ten • • _ •� w a•' .• �.• .` �' `9ctt ' • r '� • ar ; !!R " w m t i Ef. a .s , b J '�� 1 r• f ti " • �� ' rY ,\' � A ♦ +i f • . �;t•'�"+•� � �~ 'e'.. 3 r) 41.�,� i.b '+': r p` •._ x kJp!i�`*t 4I•a ! +1 .,( +< t.i,,,`Fi ' • • - 7� 4 .'-°ft 4•...y r q .�k !' ••�r l �'� k �' l ( . 'R'4 �.+^ `�* 5� _ ;� ,fir `•- 1. ��"",. , ', . �• „ _ � vet • . , Si „r ,t.l Y•• �A• ,I ' b l`Y '• ,}" v,"'YT tt J ly `- ,��+. .. IA; ',y F •t44,0 I • •�� a si �,'�b f.�.++ t •r.lsiee•.' l xY. e i I'" y.,�.�. w-4'N s° '• ,y ,'ip � ta}�; • j , r J r�Y'.>A ♦�• T• �►`Yx ••^.N«'"" q}(° #„ eF,t r•",, '= y t,,,a `"f! tiist• z �_ . a • i, !' -S t .t M'- R '.- , •F•"•1 rr7 i ' t 2 ♦ 4 r :t � s! '.+: -s- ,4 x .y,*� f .,q>+♦. .�y,,••a7• �..� ' .,. ta.' / . t' a" " * : {:p�'„"..‘''-" ''''4 *„ L'r4;i0 `if.•••::••* .." : *.;'..t.5...•i"..•'1:A•••".r:Aqr'''',--;:" • rw...,, (fi ,it-'",L,"R` + t,Af:t �> s, „^tom " •='!••" C" • •a3rTt a °{e s,!'%�,'it�, ,S. t .r•.:o s, f: 4 L}a.' .+ Alt t .4 r 'Yl' (. " l ++��� g .h?'y1, ,4, i a.♦ •'4 gg� "' 'tL�C V.' ' f r +� Say• ,�.JyyC��' `2,?.:.y;'y"3•', • ++ .� .s. :"}X ,.X.'^y .e ! Ott ' � ` g ,�q 3� 5 ., 9,: 't afr.r.4�5,`1,�+"t!"' y+ a ,'"�`;�. 11 r • 1:.i`S ,�'t� •�^ ,,J• , t •St [YQ•i• ,�� 't, `t2. „� �"'°"`" "-= • i. `` .4:3), , .,. ,�f .e 4:.,,,,, ,: ,,L. ,� ` ', ♦ iti ; i..C.'ti., t ',' r „x $ 7:si ',,it k; F •" • 4• v' ,�,' , • :� ii' " ��s` v I' „':r i i y j :IV;,. r.. s ?, c "r♦ -y .-'fi• :,e.,t.( �`►4_ isk ^, a ,:,;,kt `' -e of t,,.; + f.,.. -,, • F ..,-; 7 " 4, },. , � :.,„ .,a'""`"1 4 ;.%,'Sr a, I.:. • ,s• --•,',.a• i t 4"A� t t. t 'v b -t��°�.. • % - 444 • r= .i.. �1-�rat." t't, i w,,a+a ei '.....�:6"' :t•»�-r,.+l r,,., ...e�'1 i + ;.�' A.� t� �.� P' saca-az.rn'..ww!'"•' 'iabl ,,,,z, r a,,,„, ,,,,„ r'}, e,Y" A � �, e y ,.,y„ .:.-�' �k ram•::.•.S � p,. '�_ ,,.:.,ate 56��•j a�•.- n _ � a 2 � �•,l" ��fF xk� _= F} srk'R k' �✓ 4 �i A.,` � ti s �." der �} ,��y" � t ' ,. �' rra'• x.r '''/*wyi,•'t:...; �f,1 '' }y .i N _. ..a... .Y t } -tt.: 1 �, 7 a a r p ,, Y. .r',.♦ ((f Y +Ya '�' 4 4 r:+l•';�I oa ( ': , „ at , g: a, r,. i� ♦1 •.s,. • y, `t•! eb ,•4'.:" ,t. ,� y�,, t,,,,,� .,Y.a a.ax�Y 7.7' • • S • .a V Y C ;?'' x� ..• - 4� +!" ev- - # - •, --- .. rr;,r'�'%;.,, s' f .vc" .„ q ,£�a p • t faa � . '�f Y••^s 1 .• <, �.),"- ' ,• .t-As."+�. S t &� 't: i,A : a 4• t E;" g a .., i t t t:; t P. -,, ,,� x ��y' +4� a.9• y • .S��A•;T, w:'.?•..� a •F' v i • d. .,Y "� ,1, S#� F A :i. =t� 3 }�.' .� t r � : : ♦ ,•♦ gyp';f. w ',b•., y+..,.�:.r^' yYs�Z �r �. � ', ?� „lt a q fi 1 a ..' 7q.. .&.• t S t _ ?, i �,' t, i(11. • ♦• 1'" q a . :: ,t.7:."�•.. __ • ? i u a 4 R. �*d�i' �A �"'"3'„; r-a •,r t J ,'.� t e' F, ��, r' '• ri . L. ` ;f.:<i+�,�� • ,i Mp :i. rSL 1 �',..... 1 r ti FA,� . qqq � t x"� .,.Yl.:ee.a1. :: al - r .�e'.,' 7^° a t '�. £.�*-Ott .,.r♦ ; to` e ., + , ��, • `'v 1 • .aY ':.4,,,,,, • �,rSi'::: • • s �' +� Lacps'' 41 1• ' A,� rk• ,(";' 7'• y`r' -• `a ;� L'�\Z• .,.y ••;S• .. • , ii ;,•'�a,+a'�.%rb r."x . , :y•eft• ay • y1, ;q� �� 33 ; .rt L:'�4t ^ l�' v ,.WY, f.Y'r p y8t¢' bW+ tt ,, r 1ep r "i tiw '' �-••� 1,i -, �s• "'•-• - r"[ r ; i`y• 7-°r"'r+`f► 1 #� U a2'. t "k` ate %i .a,4,-- ,. r�r r Llt , i s7a- iw*"(�,., ("%'� "1 .r ;.�«�r- ,-„L ",d�F ....ryY��d, i.+:; Yr� 4"" � ,L' s Mgt+a ir^ wv...i;•a�.: • j,t:' ,'_,•• r q :--"_ .� `�, )':, S ' `r+ s "' y .' .,s • , ^•• r v s ',!t , ?.. ,i,, S S 3 r ,,;;! ^T, •...; '^C% • Ts,. v• e n `!x e a .-5a V�,d.4..g 3't'''� x 4 \_. -A".+as*•,,».,.ei '* +�t.:''bA':a ., i ' 7.'-' � "} •• c.;.• '...- ..bt • �:4?:• .r, M*,y,` `4' y' p, .ir .Lt .r ., >x+ 3"ter.A a {',v r srr'' ,7•1 a; .. +•.uw,1,:.• l r*�Ar"G `� H+.+ ( AA sS s'' p� 'Z••�9v'.Y i›,; . r s , , yik ,,, `t; ¢ b' t . .+i=a,, ' x.ti+ �R .,• t' ..,., -`...„ „.a t `,^' :: .,.«.,., a ,.yam ';,,«+ L' -N r+a',.7* r, ` 4 e,z. ; a i. at •"� S t,..\ Y : �t <a.+ . ....�.^ :". • : fur e ,.� �.. ate, _ -r �.'.w� - a.• �? �cd�t1 ,�(a,,y+ iS��# 1 �' ✓ ' - . r:•+. m.. «.„;g.. +.,r'"' ,"4 w� ' �t t ,. Ya�`"R".....•..-.,� ✓�_.-�--x'(•'..'�. .. r ? t t tt° - L•'1°rk r ",' ,^ ar ti •: 1 . a+ . .•'.-+..:..^"^;.. h� u •s` ry..r ,t,,, a4+.xr�„ }�• y,,S t.v�v T Yi�t F+wa"�W Y' k w -."'i .. w_...• • {^ S ..a l. L*Y .k'a.-•+. Y rJ S+, .'J I .? st .� a.{A L u "•,y �-.+y, :r- ., s�t"r :i«r �y.' yY-t 'y,. }'i 7:`fit`aJ'�t ,Wy . . dfs M. „.jti�» } s < r ; 1 e�E,,'p„.. : s,,^w%. r "y 'v'.i `,,,,.' a .ark, 7 t 4s• + 't.e •i.�.ii ; a y� i : K -e":', .0 r' .Y.•...........,....... .... ;Ya ;,. h 1,.f }' .x'a v' : , M•i ,:r, J r ;-a r �, a ,,.:... ;„„;Y f,.trXi ; ->, " :"— <;S a 4"t V I sL; r!:;w.14',7,:., ^ c.,.°'. �•'. ,i, t7'.' .. ki +., i.•_s", < ..,,Y .. .,. i.i.v 'k 1 v.�,.,,. a.;� 1 d .,.�,F,.'a,wa,. a� a s".„a3y'4, .,���� �"L..i.'R�b..yy,r.x�xw3ro � ..-�' rG"� i4v3,�'r�. -`�'"'� .^aaYt;a�.v1' fir,;,+'i«a.+� �,�:i +', ^.+G.w*•y�.t.�z?`'ir.',v.j�,w�..,t>; M�•.f-. �;h:,:.,ti.,,Y »l.:rr a r�, � +, .it�` - °' ,„,.St ,„,ytir�^ wIY- y + .hi a ,{.•�`? kr .py<. eik» >;'ia p. �.s: Wf ,rv'p.�.,F ae.» .:tzr a�,GI..„+M"`,fy«1' !"•`r" i •;:i.n�>'} .7 .r.=: i4:1 ';*.A .'"'r ir*... .. .,li "«!, • ny+. ,i)."- L.,a ,r„ ' V 37 . ; i,4?«..,, kr: +R: ..4 S.,.f A ,4, ati'MrC .a,-+:; S A. +'. s ..c .,',1 " �.,hi+. .•r qa,!' �^;..l, '�,p4 +'!?�'�'rr ":z.. �js tva'c 'L �D."s�,ya,a,[.t � �.,`,.!�......�5;�,^.,,r;,diz'=i"� 1r•... „s 1. •__t y,,+, w,a,.YY��r�"L,l.y: "4..,. „ .; - , . y -> .,1^^.y�.. I,y`4 ti y,•„.,-,wzd-,...t '.r t 1 : .! .,; 4' ,�Y 'Y ..'�L�d . ...i-'. . ♦ d " .. . .. Vi .tt a?F'x .Y °U `,i4. 4:*^ v'sJ':.3 ti+''4A i ii' } F.r i:.::- ... ,.}. J. *. 'r Sy,trt`, ...a'..i. `^'^".". • .:rr»ib -'A,"";x-,:.ar.Xra' t�.,;*4.tt f . , . r"1*,r1,,f7r; .':.;7ii ` .V&«;"'i;'.h,.,}•�1•1.."!• ;tis•,:s,; �4 .a f .r, �+ z t`rs'.;., e .. - . f 'y,+X; lw»>-t. '�"a`}�,'S",c%;♦:,,.iYt '`7 a�+ r-br ax'L. fii' ^.i�. {. a;s t fr ."'r�•t �.ixi'.� ,t.,.r;.at'' ( �>-,... :rr" .•, '"^..•-.,__,..._.,,,..,,. A...,-^ ;k ,gs x's♦ ,x;• ,M..;,, t„ ;1st .+dry"� i yr; v r. . t. a�a,t r : >rw} - �.' t . ��; Y.`�1;iM„'a;,--1,,:.y';">1.+j`.w^h:{hr, Q i^*+.. i}'-'3. °'+n"i!',c.A rr t !. ,t '''''r is tr ek �'+: t.s y '4-L'*'s' fit_ '. +.,;:- ., -.,.. ...t .Ai . ', , y., >. 4 -.4i,,._(:`',It bR. .Gp.. .}:-�'4 ,4,44 k, :s e.,,$f r , ,,-. s. , - - ......,;�,.,,,.. +5:tr Y.-•..y R~;has!,,.3� "_.''' rlr;F Y�r -. .',i•Sr",r• t;�'�•..t.. ! ,.v '!,*�?. r.wit+,... joss-r stx?� r '. C.t+",r +'f, �l}`••, '`` �`�"""�'^,,,,,.« r+5,`�f" .K`"``*`.-r ` ';sa k�y`e5'#r'S '�"t�ur�`ti„ 5�,•ry,�+•g�'a•;i"` x..'''L fi,a f'. i,� ( •r�3,,, •y k,,.,�wf'! ,• r ''�°.t"y, ;/rF • ,.. t 44 . k.r.--e , .�}r..9 r ,°S y>»Y. ,r.,.,' , .ram ,t,A .,.,,i .yt`v< ,,,-1 .;y(,.. ., ,,y` Asa,„,+, t„„le, ,;a 7:y,F s ^ Y 4,;,, .,',+t a•^"" �0 , «.• ?•. _',..-:4'Y��-s - ' ka.'« ti'�:rr. Zi 4;,o.x to ,a�� t* A;«,: :at r,q. + ,''� i ,x`� .„,� „y,.x. ,. a �r r' t:<, '•,s i• yv'!" ..y1t'�^+� � w.p ti.'2.rF�`4",lxr-,,i: ,,.,.-i;>a,p ,•s'Ct Y �:d M'.'a ?'',,`•5C, ??'«*!`a r, x; .-.r•i �' s ,.*4,., 'r. >i -r.a.. s :''4x PIP-rf. .."t=� k+t.+' ',,;s,•t.,.''�:. : .,�,'."y'1. ,) „+5..r':,,, "`ii.i5� i s'�"''e -:.. ',.'. »: _. r::::;,‘:'..,..6.2-51.-t-„z1i:f.„',,,T-4,e4;:i!:e:.,;* tv�„. . •++'E t;+t'1ii,C% V:J,T,, ,a x .}, .iJ''}., ,�y xe,.r:H atw... ." .•:,... , }.• {t ..C•!a, 4a, ,'.s; k... ," . x : '4„,4,.air1c-.1 .i'}}t t^4,• .•-.;'-' �,�:',+.� '�� ,-.r,. • : ��. t r.. ,t' £'s:t(w„,� ,.t ..I`f•'.«( ; , ur ,: +_ e, . "^Yar�t w ;,^?l� i.1 a t «-> t..,.? . {-�+cev.,,- •,;�r;,,,, ,,,,,is h< 'a. r , ,,. '�t.,.�Y, .: yr, `" `. M t t f Lr cf.,. „ .,',7� .,...,,R,'.,r "+':. .: a•+tl.yKr+, f?' x'f r.�,y'�e .d o:,4r:�pMr t; .Y: 'v .„v s••.�,•y,i'1(,.r, ,awz• ? .=, a ! t ri'V t.4".;;`2.4• ktit+ `!°1 k .r r't..ep,,r^'`',1c.,1c:1;a >:::�^ ti. (,k�.•t,y' `r s''7"L ... �1 ."„�� .4 +.......:—....:....A.....: -( „i,,. ,... a tf r4"".lir:r"'�,+,*•1 a' xj (q' '6;i0i` i+ ,,4 r+ t$.*V1�f'�, :VP.t';i y.S+' N ::•• + ram., w�' d' y G.j !;.,4„..!..,40.3i „,,A.11 . , . ?., . 40-- .?_t i;I:t''''.i'•` 'tq,",;,4.. ,..1.,,.0.',y 14 ,0,,,,,,..,V.q..,,,*, ,;(14;,,,,,„4. •,,..,„-;0011, ::.;:,',':.;],,,,•-.....".:,',.,:',!.4,,,,,=\•,,,--1—'"'-" ..;:.),": -4,,,,,,,A1 '';*,;.';'-.•,,-.J::.. - ''L.i'4i,i%i„ . --,,,,,Kt&L., L4',..:''' Qloomos°.°1°'..--- .„,----- -__;;,-•-,---".,..-,7'. - , .., .e. ------- --'''''''-_-_;1 L-.•' .....K .,.- _iwiooioi000pisoioioioioi;...t,''t;:,I,,4'Lt..":','t.:L1:'.C!''!,';„4i..,Lb„.41tf;.,;fLrL. . •I — -- i:7;,-,:k --- ,,,. ,,,,,,ir.,,,*,q... ..:,.•—L'7,.. TL-, —7‘AL_ L-.-, -.. ,.,..,..1 ,----•r-ct :L,t, ta,--L 000 ' L., t;!.Li,‘,1 .,.L IggoL4‘',,,,,',:,A.. „L 4.&,',.'.ilt4'.",t:41!- ,••••!-.1 ' 000 'os,,:',:, L'.1LLL‘L ',L• riNL"`Lt'"' -L,,,Kit,„i4..„,do.. ,,,,,,,,o„ .,‘ ,1 ,=,. ' .: ‘",.•,-. ..440A"4-,,,,,-ri..ly--",,,,i,F.. ' v..., ,. .1 .. . ,,:eil.:,,,i1.7°:000000:..,,,,,,,,,10,2 :7 zi,:.1°;,..";.; L—lii i '51 ig0 -'51' re „ .r.lc,,,,- , -0 ,,,, ., ii ,,,,,.1,01 :,,,,,-,,,t. .. r't'r,,,,,..?;;,.,,,k.••-1.ru,..,;„,%,L,,'.,'<,.i.L._._i, ,..., i tl ,0,0 ,-00 „. . ,..,,,.,. ,„,„,•.,,,ve..„,,,,,,,,,,,h..,44, • ,p '0000°°1 ..7..4;'..:j ',:;:f..7111g$4t4,00,-• . . .:. p. 1 I I .,... .' .12;P . . .. ... . II ' 1 ' :77 ,. .-- ipl 1 . , ss, I •' i , . .,. ,:„..1 t, .c...,/ '.:1;,' I , 1 ,,,. 1 'd 4:::' 1:.1':;''''''rE. pr ,,,,, • •,••. 1 • !„.„,. .1 i • ,1,,,.c.- 0 0 . ,.., 4.,..„...11...„...,..„ ,..... 1 •, „All.,„: , \!k;',:.f • . .. . ., _ ".,;— " .. k\ . - " " - - - . -- i!.',..,...,-r';'-'''','''' '.,'• .-.— :- ::-: ,..•••: '.. : • -...L.,-1• .;;. -; ',..t...1 . .-.:,-Ai.s.',1'..-. . '' . .. . •:''' ' ..:''i lj‘.:t40 , . • • • ., ,,,I?I;;'.1',A-41; , _ ..,....„„mhz.........,,,,,,, k.............................r„.. _ : .1iiii.... ..........z..,;-: _..\A„ -1‘...1412z....7.., - ...../.....=.....-.. ....-.-,, NNE,-,,,i,,,? ...„.„.,... .;,..I'''''''"• [,....:1 ..,.. .......- ....-....,---------11J.111--------- -- ';-':;-..;;-'------"--" ,114.51,gaintirflal-111111114:—. "' '''..---' [..;11111111111111L-- :--,, ., .:::* ---7----:,..------------7Hj. 111111H''"1::, 1.. , , .17, O4'."41".i4,',::: :i:,'Al44. •. . Vt.,., 47munimme,................., , ,,,! , •,... ;,..,...• .... .,====........==n, ________ '.'--.,01------:---..f ,,-, w,.z.!. `!.:Zttft‘t,t... .,...p..mm....X-L..'...µ...;r PP,t'S .ii„.'n..„,..,,,....Pii,t,,,P 4.: - . .1 ...P., .....P,p lj P. --+..mommin.... r.e. ,;:is.14- Avz.,' ,116",914.e'A. 4.1[..11.11.1 M i 1.311, ,..,.: ..... 4.: '',... :(51-...,4,: ',43,,, },,.,.1..,.. ;‘,-4.1.71.."A.4,...] ria- -, 1.--',..f,,,,,,.:,„,,,,,,,, • 0,,,,,,,, ,-, ..14,7---41p- . ,#....4,.... ..'-, ., . LANE ' .;,.:'*':.',,Y,•,, '11',1-.47..,.ie,-•',:i‘^,4 , ;I . 4,. r''''..,•‘-,,-.. '-11,•;:qr• •••" '4;•""..;4;11 'I 42VV !'l c.,,,,...„,;„,=== .• ....., , , ..,,,•,,,.•,?,..,,,..tt, • 0,..._,..,,,r...•;•• ... .., , •-•,.,,.,..„..,,,..A. ,,„•,..•,,-,,,,•,,,,,,,,,„„ ir!....--._.. ...--, , .0 ''',, ' 04'.i.,',ig:'' :, . -e r",''''';$:S'ifrlgif:')''' i!' 'Ali*: *0.1 . •... .''' ''='=''' .4' 'p 11''144k..1'.' • •:! .-•''''•'',:ik%' '':-'`.',.' !i. ;'''''1''4i':1'1; ';'7';'''• ''':71,`:'''''' .:;•1-1' • 1===== .020120 ' t ISO= •!:. •A..•,,.. •„, „„,;-„,... .;•••:.:.,,,,,,,,,l•1.,..0,,,',...1„.. , ,r,,,,;ti4t.ip',", .„.....- ,...11 10.- , ....... , , i..... ., .,, , i ..7 e .0101=0,200=2 IMIS93 C'' ' 1, .• • 4‘,.,,f4. ,,,i;?-,,, .;:i,‘,,, 1,;;,..,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,c r,*,...„ $,, ,:.:2:1.,,,,,,, . ,,- ,„,-...;,..,,,e.,,,,,I,,,,f4,,;;,,,,., „..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,4:::,...,,,,,,, ,,,,..„,..,,,,,,,,.,•:.,1 z / ,, , .........— .4.... , ....... , ..„.!...,,I,,,,.. ,,.,,,),:,4., ...•,,,„• ,„:,,.. ,,....,...),-. ,,r-0„,..„..„:, ±..t.,;-,•!..,,...."v2;. .', wr,,,,,I.K.•••=4,./ .•,..,,,„,,,,,,iv.p1,41,,,,ti.A.,g,,,,,..:1„....j , .„. ,,,,,,.„..„,.„,,,,,,,r,.,.,,,,..., •-,;,,,,'1-4,.. 1,.,.:'• '''''4.%),*'1"P.'''',.;*...4P'' .• . .. 69132. 113. I ' S I, . . * to L.: p p , 10= == .... . ''t ' ' ' St: P;'.14,,,SPP' 'i''' ‘‘'.'''..'P'•'1"‘”.1..."',1*..''A..'tt P. K.,:,,, . ,,,,,, ,,,,,,,I, `ei'-.,::,.rq..; J' ,A"-:',..1, -'-"'.., , • •.,,•14",•1, Wit4N'...ie.;,",k.)'.':,,,..4 1..'.,q,' .00' )•3'." .,..,,,- . ,',.,.'-'.',%.t , , ,.. tt:.... ". '',.',,..."...17.• r.,,,.,,F.,,,,,,,, 5,,,,„, (.,,,,, . ..,. .,,,,,„,,,„,„,., ........._____ ._....F1 L--'--------''''F4,,, r, i ,' '.,',' .".•',:::''''k ','',4"*4.,174?:::,'i: ' Pkil:.11' 1''''' '1.'',1'' i';',",•"1'.• < / \ / ' ' ._,.....1 • i ‘ \ 1 • . L ..••••),.„,,,,. .., lg i••••;.,50.•0•0,', , -,IF, „ • ,.,_ *,,, , .-,... .,,,,,, ,... 1 I 1 ,'i -'- -1 . . 1, :-..,., ,.--_., ..,, i .t • , i 1 .:•, .Li,.,,,.,..x, ,,,,,,,,..,,,..1 1 - , •,,,'.-iiioi • -4 . '3i•'"•,,i,.;......,:e. , , . :„ . . • .. :,..ft.. - ....1 .,,,.., '.0..,..',...,Y.,4::., "PtP 5....,.... .1 4A .w?A• '...':•4*.Y.i:','• ' ri, ., : . ' ' .... .,.. ) 0, t.: • ": '' VI— -'-- 1.4' C2), - - ,.., _. ' .'.«t " ...,. , ..... .... ... ......... ............... ....... ... .. ........... .. ................. ........................ .............................. . .. ...................................... 4 i'?a3M,.„,^'; N . rF�`. `��',.f, \,+'f :w.M ,�:k w."' 3,"egv., kNt.51 Y id txJ � I� •�a y St •A•7 r-r t 0 n..P x{ �: + u.%:7 �.,A t..., 1 a �r `:g..; a 7. ti•r . .. C i � A' q V r µ,i rY `' ` a�;r 'x�A' ,'i114� y tt ?, � x�,'F `• �p r �'�1.�rh�c9�i ' •. ' Y e a s frfr r�+r� t,, ` ::....Mi. 3I'/ i a:3E R' „ t :.r } r fj c^ev# �ry fG rv.:`h f ti )t t , tf ! e. 2o9.Ty ^ rS. r Yy s iY26 ' , N f t re, � t 1a 1 fd , s , ' 3 ,:®/ cW m / �� k es Fr r r ,; r t s ` ,f3 i m :vk . ,, 3. " w {�< a,. a Q Ur 'V i Lyu Q h x ! P,s P p,�1 } Sx h fig f - 'd b i, \•.. I'd �y�F I Cr� 1, dS, I�CL 3 ,„,.,iopo.. t. ti > i)4,y. x.` ��� nY fx• � 'G' , ,`ti5 l'..� ��L ..-- -"L, s� �t "•y r My �Fl x�j 3 U .; • F ; rt k \ �!.q.� , y , ��a.,� ,rS! ' I ` .�V�i", T •,`:,4\,,ti .-. 'key` 1. ._nr :','� • r 4' i' � Jyh;� i'°n^,..,, Iw •, Pln ... 4410 rx, 0 4, ‘,- .r,, ,,,4i,4,4..,,,,,...,,,,a.,.:.,n;44 ,,,,,,,,,---•,,,- .,0,1,,,,-,i,,,,,,,,,T,„,,,,;,,,7,31,4-4„H'',••••,•.:4';‘,,'‘,,,34,...''P',,,,,k',47„,F; / ..,„,..;.A414,4,tiv,,,-t,r,r. ,••;.,•- ' ,,,,,,ri:,.":,::".Z.,:„.:11,11,4.,t.:k4e054,04_,,,4,,,,l''' . ,;,.14 f.,,,,,,.,;-r,, 1p.+.,,,,f4•ks ,...,',0 l'At , ,),,, ...6 44,,,' ,.• -1^,, "''''',1,i':1:‘R,',6::::•;1,;,.'.;:',, L l' 1#4,:‘,. 0,:,, k,-.,: Ai,' .f.,,,,,,, :.,,A,1=6',..7::-..,- . t, ,,,,.*'','4‘,'''' t ,..,...,,71,;,•,-„,s08,r,,iv.'' ia 'v.,.,. . ,p-Apr',.ki;,..,,4,,,,,,,.y. fp,^...„ 'V.s...,,,,' :-.4.,,..,k-,Y.;,,,,,.;.",,;•:,,},.,,...,,,,,. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:',-i;,,,,'•.,,,,,Z,e',..: 'e.,:10,'4.71..*-.,, ,',i 04"4,",.,•%;+, 4fr."-- ,9- ..',;,,k,'Y .til, i!,..'7,,m. .A.og,h..!:.,:,,,t4,,..-,tii,.:;,.tri'i' ,,,qW:44 r;r7,,Ot.,:, .,"1 . ..t'.:', .....14:41,.'"' ••:;Z:'' •',.,...* .n. tv.,,,' 1,',.2I:.,,,`" , .,:i ,.r.....,',.-Z,..-. „//r,,,,,, .„,-; ,,,,;„.. ....4, , :1•-•• -,.qT:41....v., ' '.',..'4:Tda.041, 4 t,'?.''', -/ ..,-,,',<7.0p,,.,,',•::',-;,".,..,, ',„', .'' ..-, ,.• .A.,..:40' 4.A„.,,- ,,ns':t!,7,''i,.,,5::-''' 01'91,.,01, ''''':„1,4'''.::4-0;,4`...1: 3'..1, - `, -`,• , ,;;. 1 ,T.pi''' ,.?:;,,,19 ea , ''gLv, '141,N,, ..•>1 _ ,- rp,'.' ...'$'•••' Lc-4%..,,‘ ''''„,,,,,t,..,'''-' .4i,'• ----/<,-•-.4"4..--,__— ,..- , ii, -,,,..‹,"-• ....-,:i,:- ....•'',.'Aft, ,..„,,,...,---1,r,--- 4.....,,,p•-•-, , '15 ..'-',' - • -,,,. --.'.' .:?...'.-->,, ,-4... ,2,-- ,,,,,- 4,,, ilp' .......,,Vc1, ,e:,'v ,,,:e4,- ...,.. , -,.. ''''-''• ...., 4- ' ',../ ,,r.I.,:',,•,,a•-•.•,,I,i4.4:t'. „..,.:-.-' „,,... ..›,- ,.., 1-, 1,,,..t-' k-. z$-- - ,., ...,',„•,/ ..,,,t,,, .-/ - ,-• . I ''.. .- ' " : ....., ,..,-....e.P. ,..0%, •.......„4, .,,..e..,,, •.,,,, <4.44::,..,• ,,,,'‘,...,",;,- ,:',.I fi,"-. 1 .,..„ V!,,,y,_ ...,,,,- ,..,,,,,-- ,....,._„,_.- ,,,,,, „•,„ . <..,:,..„..,.„. „„7„,,..,, 4,. •iv• ,,,.:, / / .'-':.-- • -,-- -t.:- 4,„,,e ,..,,,-....--"- i•ly .,,.,..,;›, 4.:.,, 4.0- ,.,.2 _;.- „.,, , ,,v,..„,...,,,,, .....,-- „," 0,--.1•••• „...i , ,.;‘,.....7ts.,,,,,, ,.:".. ,;;;.„,/ .:"..'? :p...' ,,,,:i,:;,,, v,,,•„2,., -- ..., ,,-\.,)r , ,,,,,,,:„. ,...;:,,..., .. ,.,;:-. ;,..., .,,,,, , .1..,,,,,,,,.. ..,...,„ . ...., .i .,i'(:1 ,i ''ke-,,--'" 4s,;,.."' '' ..,/ ' 1 ,',;1 .,,,,/ • , ....-- ' ..J.,' .' , :•,,,,, --„,- .,,1 ,,,,,,••,,,,,,, ,-.,, . . ,,,,/ ;/ • , „.......„.4 ,.,..s,, 4.,:l •,,, t,„v ‹,:,3„,,,,_,., ,.._:. .,....„,...... "„..,,_.., /*'..i'',/ j ,, 0,,,,,,, • .,,40:5. 41b...-„,, ,4'•',.. '.. •:',",,...,,' ,. ',,,.71 . \ 1 , 4. • '''' './ .'i , ,,,r;.' .•••••:.„,,,..-,,, -..:_-, ,,,,•„?.,, •:••• 0011 ,, ...,•:...,;1 -,'" ' , ' , t ' - lis•-• •-•.,. •.. .,,... ,,.. ,‘ ,. ,, ,,,,,,, •;,%`,/ ..c.."1.:A' ''.(7'' 4tir.",'F'1,••;..g;;'i: ..,,•-',,,,.• , 1\ ''', ''';' ,,' •• '' '''.:4;...' ''''' ,z(,./,,,..., .„‘.. ,Al ',,.. ' IIV'' ••--, -,.• / 1 ''''''r'll'i',1, ' ' .,i•-•.'', ,,...., ., ‘...„.",'•S''', I,,P.'.5 , ! '''...''i:';•q :.4"?',,r,•,... •- •, ••..., . , ,,,,, . , .. / --;•;,., -w•;)'" ••• , :,.. !,..... . •,;,.. . ,,f,:...2:»'11•,'•;-,. ' : •'., ' .. \-:'''''..;••-'. ' ' k`'..i. ''''i ,.- .' ..,.X tl.,,,,:.,:,id,,,,,',:.,':.:"4:'/ .t."...4-;,.4-:. • . ., , , ,,,,,;.:•:...,.' - .:- , A , \.,... .{ ,,,,' .':'''.1.4 p'‘'• I • ,..' . '''''''"',e,',.1,',"t',',•,- , .., 4 4 • 4.4. , NI HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD •CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: December 21, 2005 AGENDA ITEM: Ill.B ITEM: Old School Square Parking Garage (Southside of NE 1st Street between NE 1st Avenue and NE 2nd Avenue) — Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness and Associated Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements, and Demolition two structures. GENERAL DATA: Owner City of Delray Beach Applicant City of Delray Beach Agent City of Delray Beach Location Southside of NE 1st Street between NE 1st Avenue and NE 2nd Avenue _ i ST . 3f2D Property Size 1.7 Acres NE = i in iill Future Land Use Map OMU (Other Mixed Use)/CBD 410 (Commercial Business District) l� 1 �' Current Zoning OSSHAD/CBD p� i �s Adjacent Zoning North: OSSHAD/CBD - £ il '� East: CBD I1 = Imoo I South: OSSHAD/CBD .. — NE. Ma West: OSSHAD 3 Existing Land Use Commercial D O Proposed Land Use Parking Structure/Retail W Water Service Existing on site. Sewer Service Existing on site. f1111 IS s W�"r mo w z■■z OLD III SCHOOL SQUARE II / II1 = ATLANTIC AVENUE Lu I 11 ,,, I III S£ 1ST i7///_ N Old School Square Parking Garage COA 2006-085 :ITEM BEFORE THE BOARQ The action before the Board is approval of a Class V site plan request for Old School Square Parking Garage, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F). The request involves the following: • Site Plan; • Landscape Plan; • Building Elevations, and; • Demolition. The subject property is located on the south side of NE 1st Street and spans from NE 1St Avenue to NE 2"d Avenue. BACKGROUND The location of the subject site is described below; for an illustration of the site location, please refer to the location map on the cover sheet. The site is located on the south side of NE 1St Street, spans eastward from NE 1st Avenue to NE 2"d Avenue and contains a portion of 35 NE 1st Avenue (Lots 3-5, Less West 10 Feet SE 1st Ave R/W, Lot 6, Less Southerly 44.99 Feet and West 10 Feet SE 1st Ave), 85-95 NE 1st Avenue (Lot 1 and 2, Block 76, Town of Delray), and 96 NE 2"d Avenue (Lots land 8, Block 76, Town of Delray). An alley is located between the parcels on NE 1st Avenue and NE 2"d Avenue, stretching south from NE 1st Street to an east-west alley running perpendicular and connecting NE 1st Avenue with NE 2"d Avenue. The parcels located to the west of the existing alley are located within the Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD), zoned OSSHAD, and are part of the CBD (Central Business District) Overlay District. The parcels to the east of the alley are zoned CBD. Therefore, the project is reviewed by the CBD zoning standards, and is subject to the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Historic Preservation. The existing structures on the lot are located at 85-95 NE 1st Avenue and 96 NE 2"d Avenue. The structure at 85-95 NE 1st Avenue was originally known as the old Goodwill Store, and most recently as the Toussaint L'Overture International High School. This structure was built in 1949 and is considered a contributing property in the Old School Square Historic District. The structure located at 96 NE 2"d Avenue was built in 1964 and was originally known as Love's Drugs. The Master Site File for the property does not designate the existing structure as a significant architectural resource to the area and notes that it would not be eligible for individual designation on the Local Register of Historic Places. Most recently, the building was used as a florist and stand-alone bar. The applicant proposes to demolish the existing structures; the existing businesses either have been or will be relocated to other locations within the City. The property at 35 NE 1st Avenue is currently a parking lot. A portion of this parking lot will be used in the parking garage development, with the remainder of the land to be converted into a park, per the Old School Square Master Plan. Preliminary reviews were held in July and August 2005 with respect to the proposed elevations (See Review By Others). The applicant was directed to address those comments prior to an official submittal for review by the Board. Page 1 of 18 Old School Square Parking Garage 2006-085 The Class V Site Plan application package regarding the Old School Square Parking Garage development project to be located on Block 76 within the OSSHAD and CBD zoning district is the action now before the Board. PROJECT DESCRIPTIO The development proposal incorporates the following: • Demolition of a contributing 1949 structure and a 1964 structure. • Construction of a mixed-use, five level parking garage containing 523 parking spaces, and; • Installation of associated landscaping around the perimeter of the site. The proposed parking garage contains a total of 246,638 square feet, including 16,500 square feet of retail/commercial space on the ground level, along NE 1st Street and NE 2nd Avenue. The ground floor will also contain the main entrance along NE 1st Avenue and a parking area containing 21 spaces reserved for special events. SITE PLAN ANALYSIS 1 TECH:NICAL ITE`M'S COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. HEIGHT LDR Section 4.4.13(F)(1) Height Overall height of buildings shall be a minimum of twenty-five feet (25') and a maximum of forty-eight feet (48') in height. Exceptions to the height limitations shall comply with Section 4.3.4(J)(3) and (4). Section 4.3.4 (J)(b) Appurtenances on Buildings Appurtenances usually required to be placed above the roof level of a building and not intended for human occupancy may be allowed to extend above the height limitations contained in Subsection (K) but only when specifically approved by action of the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board. The overall height of the proposed structure is forty-eight feet (48'). At the east and west, tower like elements exist which expand beyond the upper roof line in order to accommodate for the elevators. Therefore, the height of those elements exceeds the forty-eight foot (48') maximum and measure up to sixty feet (60') (midpoint of the slope on the east and west). Because these appurtenances are required to be above the roof level, the height requirement has been met. OPEN SPACE LDR Section 4.4.13(F)(2) A minimum of 10% non-vehicular open space shall be provided; however, within the area encompassed by the boundaries of the original Downtown Development Authority as Page 2 OT 18 Old School Square Parking Garage 2006-085 described in Section 8.2.2(B), and within those sections of the CBD zoning district located within the Pineapple Grove Main Street area and east of the Intracoastal Waterway, there shall be no minimum open space requirement. Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, the body acting upon a development application within the CBD may require that open areas, including but not limited to courtyards, plazas, and landscaped setbacks, be provided in order to add interest and provide relief from the building mass. The subject property is located within the original boundaries of the DDA, is subject to the CBD regulations and is partially located within the Pineapple Grove Main Street area; therefore, the open space requirement does not apply. However, while this requirement does not apply, it should be noted that a park will be located to the south of the parking garage providing sufficient open space to the area. BUILDING FRONTAGE AND SETBACKS Notes to Tables 4.3.13-1 and 4.4.13-2 (6) Building frontage requirements for parking garages may be increased to a maximum 100% for all floors by the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board or the Historic Preservation Board subject to compliance with Section 4.6.18(B)(14)(vi)4), Parking Garages. (7) The building setback requirements for portions of parking garages above twenty-five feet (25') may be waived by the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board or the Historic Preservation Board subject to compliance with Section 4.6.18(B)(14)(vi)4), Parking Garages, and a minimum five (5) to maximum ten foot (10') setback for the portion of the building from finished grade to twenty-five feet (25') in height. LDR Section 4.6.18(B)(14)(vi)(4) (4) Due to the requirements of a particular land use or structural needs, parking garages or the garage portion of the building may request an increase from the building frontage requirements (to a maximum of 100% for all floors) or a waiver from the setback requirements of Section 4.4.13(F)(3) (for portions of the building above twenty-five feet) subject to compliance with the following requirements: (a) The garage or the garage portion of the building elevation provides unified design elements with the main building through the use of similar materials and color,vertical and horizontal elements, and architectural style. (b) A minimum 50% of the ground floor perimeter of the garage or the garage portion of the building adjacent to street right-of-ways shall be devoted to window displays or floor area for active uses such as retail stores, personal and business service establishments, entertainment, offices, etc... This number may be reduced by the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board or the Historic Preservation Board. (c) Architectural features shall be incorporated into the facade to mitigate the building's mass and bulk and along portions of the building adjacent to street right-of-ways. Page 3 of 18 Old School Square Parking Garage 2006-085 The proposed structure has been setback from the existing paved roadways along NE 1st Street and NE 2nd Avenue by pavered sidewalks. The sidewalk measures sixteen feet, four inches (16'4") along NE 1st Street, and varied between eleven feet, four inches (11'4") and seventeen feet, six inches (17'6") along along NE 2nd Avenue (Pineapple Grove Way). The applicant therefore requests a waiver from any setback and frontage requirements that may apply. Additionally, the proposal includes ground floor area retail spaces. It appears that the elevations located on NE 1st Street and NE 2nd Avenue comply with the above requirement stated in LDR 4.6.18(B)(14)(vi)(4)(c). However, this requirement has not been met along NE 1st Avenue, where no retail spaces have been provided. The Board may reduce this requirement, and is therefore a condition of approval. DESIGN REQUIREMENTS Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.18(vi) and (vii) (vi)Parking garages: Above ground parking garages shall comply with the architectural requirements of this Section and the following additional requirements: (1) Ramps shall be visually screened from streets and adjacent residential zoning districts and oriented towards the interior of the lot within a project where possible. Ramp profiles shall be hidden on the exterior elevations. This requirement has been met. (2) Roof top parking shall be visually screened with articulated parapet walls or other architectural treatment acceptable to the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board. Exterior lighting shall utilize fixtures provided with cut-off shielding in order to eliminate glare and spillage onto adjacent properties and roadways. No rooftop parking has been proposed. (3) The openings of the garage shall be designed in a manner that obscures parked vehicles. Decorative architectural elements on the ground floor level shall be designed to accommodate the pedestrian scale. Parking levels above the ground floor shall maintain the same vertical and horizontal articulation or rhythm and incremental appearance established on the ground floor. The ground floor level contains commercial spaces and appears to accommodate the pedestrian scale through its barrel tiled roof overhangs which provide a sense of human scale and blocks out the mass of the structure from the street level. (vii) In addition to the requirements of this Section, buildings within the Pineapple Grove Main Street Neighborhood shall comply with the Design Guidelines contained within the Pineapple Grove Main Street Neighborhood Plan. The Pineapple Grove Design Review Committee shall review the project for compliance with the Pineapple Grove Neighborhood Plan prior to action by the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board and the Historical Preservation Board. The Pineapple Grove Design Review Committee reviewed the preliminary proposal; those comments are noted in this report (See Review By Others.) Land Replat and Alley Abandonment The development proposal includes separately platted lots. As the site is to be a unified development, a Unity-of-Title for the property is appropriate. However, the land should be replatted. An alley is currently located through the middle of Block 76, connecting to another alley, to the south. The plans show a gas line running through the middle, therefore, the alleys Page 4 of 18 Old School Square Parking Garage 2006-085 should be abandoned, rather than remain below a structure and a park. That a replat and alley abandonment be submitted is included as a condition of approval. Florida Building Code Pursuant to Florida Building Code Section 3002.4, in buildings four stories in height or more, at least one elevator shall be provided for fire department emergency access to all floors. Such elevator car shall be of such a size and arrangement to accommodate a 24 inch (24") by seventy-six inch (76") ambulance stretcher in the horizontal, open position and shall be identified by the international symbol for emergency medical services (star of life). The symbol shall not be less than three inches (3") high and shall be placed inside on both sides of the hoistway door frame. This code has not been met. The elevator size should be revised to meet the Florida Building Code and is therefore a condition of approval. LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS The proposed landscaping is minimal on some elevations or non-existent on others. Landscape elements were not reviewed in the preliminary analysis done by the various review boards and committees. Therefore, some technical items should be addressed such as: 1. Landscape plans for NE 1st Street should be consistent with the plans coordinated by the Engineering Department. 2. Foundation landscaping has not been included; the only related landscaping occurs within nodes in the sidewalks. 3. Live Oaks are proposed along NE 1st Street where overhead lines currently exist. If these lines are to remain, Royal Palms would be a better choice. 4. Tree gates along Atlantic Avenue have created maintenance issues and should therefore be eliminated from the proposal. Low ground covers would be a preferable solution as they would add more interest to the plan. Additionally, the areas provided for the tree cut-outs are not large enough and should be increased to six feet (6') by ten feet (10')which would allow room for the tree roots. 5. A parking space should be eliminated along the north side to provide a mid-block landscape node. This elevation, as proposed, lacks sufficient vertical landscape elements. 6. An above ground support system is proposed and is not desirable. An underground support system should be used or wrought iron tree guards could also be an option. 7. A root barrier should be required around the six foot (6') by six foot (6') planting space to help avoid the tree roots lifting the pavement. 8. Japanese Fern Trees, at a height of sixteen to eighteen feet (16'-18'), are proposed along Pineapple Grove Way. This type of tree is not available and should be revised. • 9. The proposed tree areas on Pineapple Grove Way located on either end of the on-street parking are square and do not take advantage of the surrounding dead space. This area should be enlarged which would provide more green space and lessen unnecessary dead space. 10. The west side of the parking garage, as proposed, is devoid of any landscaping. Curbed landscape nodes with low ground covers in the striped asphalt areas should be provided. 11. Lines of sight should be provided and intersections adjacent to the parking garage should be shown on the plan, as consideration should be taken into account regarding the proposed columns and their impact on the ability to see pedestrians and traffic. Page 5 of 18 Old School Square Parking Garage 2006-085 DEMOLITION ANALYSwlS; Lots 1 and 2 contain a one story structure which was built in 1949 which was originally known as the Goodwill Store and most recently used as the Toussaint L'Overture International High School. The structure is listed as Contributing in the Old School Square Historic District. The existing structure across the existing alley located at 96 NE 2"d Avenue was originally known as Love's Drugs. Most recently the building was divided between a flower shop and a stand-alone bar. The building was constructed in 1964 and is not considered eligible for individual designation on the Local Register of Historic Places. The structures are to be demolished as part of this development proposal. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1), The HPB shall consider the following guidelines in evaluating applications for a COA for demolition of historic buildings; (a) Whether the structure is of such interest or quality that it would reasonably fulfill the criteria for designation for listing on the National Register. (b) Whether the structure is of such design, craftsmanship, or material that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty or economically nonviable expense. (c) Whether the structure is one of the last remaining examples of its kind in the designated historic district within the city. (d) Whether retaining the structure would promote the general welfare of the city by providing an opportunity to study local history, architecture, and design, or by developing an understanding of the importance and value of a particular culture and heritage. (e) Whether there are definite plans for immediate reuse of the property if the proposed demolition is carried out, and what effect those plans will have on the character of the surrounding area. The structures do not fulfill the criteria for individual listing in the National Register, nor do they represent a level of design or craftsmanship that would warrant the structures to be saved. However, the structure at 85-95 NE 1st Avenue is a contributing structure to the Old School Square built inventory. The demolition request is therefore left to the Board's discretion. Should the Board approve demolition of the structures, documentation should be submitted and is therefore a condition of approval. DESIGN ELEMENTS Pursuant to LDR 4.5.1(E)(7), the construction of new buildings or structures, or the relocation, alteration, reconstruction, or major repair or maintenance of a non- contributing building or structure within a designated historic district shall meet the same compatibility standards as any material change in the exterior appearance of an existing non-contributing building. Any material change in the exterior appearance of any existing non-contributing building, structure, or appurtenance in a designated historic district shall be generally compatible with the form, proportion, mass, configuration, building material, texture, color, and location of historic buildings, structures, or sites adjoining or reasonably approximate to the non-contributing building, structure, or site. Pursuant to LDR 4.5.1(E)(8), all improvements to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility shall be determined in terms of the following criteria: rage 6 OT 18 Old School Square Parking Garage 2006-085 (a) Height: The height of proposed buildings or modifications shall be visually compatible in comparison or relation to the height of existing structures and buildings. The proposed structure measures forty-eight feet (48') in height, and is located within the Old School Square Historic District, where many residential properties exist. However, it is also located within one block of Atlantic Avenue, and is adjacent to Old School Square and the Pineapple Grove Way area, where structures larger than residential scale can be found. (b) Front Facade Proportion: The front facade of each building or structure shall be visually compatible with and in direct relationship to the width of the building and to the height of the front elevation of other adjacent or adjoining buildings within a historic district. The proposed elevations provide substantial visual compatibility in relationship to the proportions of the building. The towers which flank each elevation provide an anchor to the building at each end. (c) Proportion of Openings (Windows and Doors): The openings of any building within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the openings exemplified by the prevailing historic architectural styles within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors to the height of windows and doors among buildings within the district shall be visually compatible. The relationship of openings provides a unified rhythm throughout the design and is compatible with the prevailing historic architectural styles within the district. (d) Rhythm of Solids to Voids; Front Facades: The relationship of solids to voids in the front facade of a building or structure will be visually compatible with the front facades of historic buildings or structures within the district. There is very unified rhythm within the design of the solids and voids on the front facade. (e) Rhythm of Buildings on Streets: The relationship of buildings to open space between them and adjoining buildings shall be visually compatible with the relationship between historic sites, buildings, or structures within a historic district. The proposed parking structure appears to be visually compatible with the adjacent buildings. The future park to be located to the south of the structure will provide a relief in building mass between Atlantic.Avenue and the parking garage. (f) Rhythm of Entrance and/or Porch Projections: The relationship of entrances and porch projections to the sidewalks of a building shall be visually compatible with the prevalent architectural styles of entrances and porch projections on historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. The projecting first-floor roof plane provides a sense of scale at the pedestrian level, therefore providing a visual compatibility with the existing elements in the historic district. (g) Relationship of Materials, Texture, and Color: The relationship of materials, texture, and color of the facade of a building shall be visually compatible with the predominant materials used in the historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. The proposed materials and textures appear to be compatible with the historic district. However, a color scheme has not been submitted and is therefore a condition of approval. (h) Roof Shapes: The roof shape of a building or structure shall be visually compatible with the roof shape of a historic site, building, or structure within a historic district. The overall roof shape is flat with gabled tower ends at each corner. Visual compatible can be found with respect to the roof shape. Page 7 of 18 • Old School Square Parking Garage 2006-085 (i) Walls of Continuity: Appearances of a building or structure such as walls, wrought iron, fences, evergreen landscape masses, or building facades, shall form cohesive walls of enclosure along a street to insure visual compatibility of the building to historic buildings, structures, or sites to which it is visually related. Certain elements regarding the walls of continuity within the proposal appear to be visually compatible. However, additional vertical landscaping and greenspace should be provided to further extend the sense of pedestrian scale and the neighborhood feeling. (j) Scale of a Building: The size of a building, the building mass in relation to open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, and porches shall be visually compatible with the building size and building mass of historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. While the proposed structure is large in scale and massing, there have been many elements incorporated into the design to mitigate this large scale feeling offering compatibility with the surrounding historic district. (k) Directional Expression of Front Elevation: A building shall be visually compatible with the buildings, structures, and sites in its directional character, whether vertical, horizontal, or nondirectional. Visual compatibility has been achieved within the directional expression of the front elevation along NE 1st Street. Based on the above analysis, positive findings can be made with respect to LDR Section 4.5.1(E). PINEAPPLE GROVE WAY MAIN STREET DESIGN GUIDELINES The 1998 edition of the Pineapple Grove Way Main Street Neighborhood Plan provides the following applicable guidelines: A "Floribbean" architectural and design character is encouraged throughout the program area. The word "Floribbean" is defined by the PGW plan as, "a term that connotes a blend of traditional, historic South Florida characteristics with a Caribbean/Latin influence. The proposed design appears to be in keeping with this guideline. Building design should strike a balance between the individual identity and continuity with neighboring buildings. The building, as proposed, provides an individual identity and continuity with neighboring buildings. It does not appear that the building will be in conflict with the surrounding buildings, nor with the historic Old School Square Building. Stucco finishes are acceptable. The building is completely clad in stucco. The stucco on the first story will be scored to give the appearance of large blocks of stone or concrete. This will create a heavier appearance to the first floor anchoring it to the large mass above. The stucco on the levels above will be smooth allowing it have a lighter feel in contrast with the first story. When visible to the general public, the roofing materials consisting of tin, slate or barrel tile are encouraged. A true, terracotta barrel tile has been designated as the roofing material, where applicable. This roofing material would be the most appropriate type for this structure. Canopies are encouraged in the Program Area. The proposed canvas canopies/awnings are located at various points of entry along NE 1st Street and NE 2nd Avenue and are of a bubble type shape. However, a color has not yet been proposed and is therefore a condition of approval. Pa 8o'18 Old School Square Parking Garage 200E-085 "Vintage" light fixtures are encouraged, especially those that reflect the Floribbean character of the Program Area. Specifications regarding any lighting on the property have not been provided. These fixtures should be consistent with the existing street lighting improvements within the Pineapple Grove Way Main Street area, yet be in keeping with the Old School Square Historic District. Submittal of this information is therefore a condition of approval. REQUIRED FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is a part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. Section 3.1.1 (A) - Future Land Use Map: The subject property lies within two zoning districts and two Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designations. The portion to the west of the alley has a FLUM designation of OMU (Other Mixed Use), zoned OSSHAD within the CBD Overlay District. The portion to the east of alley is zoned CBD and has a FLUM designation of CC (Commercial Core). The CBD zone district is consistent with the CC Future Land Use Map designation. The proposed municipal parking garage is allowed as a permitted use in this geographical area of the OSSHAD zone district[ref: 4.4.13 (B)(3)]. Based upon the above, it is appropriate to make a positive finding with respect to consistency with the Future Land Use Map designation. Section 3.1.1 (B) -Concurrency: As described in Appendix A, a positive finding of concurrency can be made as it relates to water, sewer, streets and traffic, drainage, parks and recreation, open space, solid waste, and schools. Section 3.1.1 (C) -Consistency (Standards for Site Plan Actions): As described in Appendix B, a positive finding of consistency can be made as it relates to Standards for Site Plan Actions. Section 3.1.1 (D) -Compliance With the Land Development Regulations: As described under the Site Plan Analysis of this report, a positive finding of compliance with the LDRs can be made, when all outstanding items attached as conditions of approval are addressed. Section 2.4.5 (F)(5) -Compatibility(Site Plan Findings): The approving body must make a finding that development of the property pursuant to the site plan will be compatible and harmonious with adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole, so as not to cause substantial depreciation of property values. The subject property is bordered on the north, south and east sides by OSSHAD zoning and CBD on the west. The adjacent land uses include various types of commercial and non- residential uses. Page9of 18 • Old School Square Parking Garage 2006-O85 Compatibility with the surrounding uses is a concern given the proposed height of the building. The proposed height of the building to the top of the 5 level will be forty-eight feet (48')with the appurtenances measuring up to sixty feet (60'). Although there is a difference in height, the building will be compatible with adjacent Old School Square building, and the structures located on the same block along Atlantic Avenue. There are structures located in the surrounding Pineapple Grove Main Street area that exceed the building heights located in the OSSHAD zone district. There are single family dwellings to the north of NE 1st Street and in the surrounding areas which should be buffered as they are not located directly adjacent to the proposed structure. The garage, along NE 1st Street and NE 2nd Avenue, contains retail spaces on the ground level with a projecting, barrel tile roof type overhang giving the streetscape of the structure a more pedestrian scale rather than a large massive concrete box. Additionally, large picture windows are located along these facades to lessen the impact of the large concrete walls located above. These elements help to provide some relief to the bulkiness of the façade and an overall feeling of less mass to the building. The Old School Square Parking Garage is a much-needed use in the downtown area. Allowing the parking garage to be built on the subject property will help satisfy the parking demands of the adjacent Old School Square, nearby restaurants, various other commercial establishments in the area and more importantly, provide adequate parking for large events held in the city. The garage is an important component of the Old School Square Redevelopment Plan and a mixed-use development that will help fulfill the need for year-round residents in the downtown area. In this regard, the parking garage will help to fulfill Comprehensive Plan Policies that are described below. Based upon the above, a finding of compatibility can be made that the garage will not have a detrimental effect on the adjacent and nearby properties. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: A review of the objectives and policies of the adopted Comprehensive Plan was conducted and the following applicable objectives and policies have been identified. Future Land Use Element: Objective A-1: - Property shall be developed or redeveloped in a manner so that the future use and intensity is appropriate and complies in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations, is complimentary to adjacent land uses, and fulfills remaining-land use needs. The property is partially developed as an educational facility, a retail shop and stand-alone bar, which are to be demolished as part of this development proposal. Additionally, a parking lot exists, which is to be removed as part of this development proposal and the Old School Square Master Plan which also plans to place a park on the remaining land not used by the parking structure. There are no special physical or environmental characteristics of the land that would be negatively impacted by the proposed parking garage. Further, the intensity is appropriate as noted under the Compatibility section of the report. The development will be complimentary with the surrounding commercial developments and residential uses as it will eliminate many of the existing blighted surface parking lots and provide organized parking in one location. In terms of fulfilling remaining land use needs, as discussed below, the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan states that the City shall be the lead agency in pursuing the construction and operation of tiered paring structures with mixed uses in the CBD. Policy C-3.2: - The successful development of the Old School Square Project is the cornerstone to the rebirth of the economic vitality of the community. To further accommodate this activity, the City shall evaluate the potential for the acquisition of land Old School Square Parking Garage 2006-085 in the Old School Square area of the City for the purpose of improving public parking and/or creating a linkage between Old School Square and governmental facilities to the west. Policy C-4.1: The Central Business District (CBD) zoning District regulations shall facilitate and encourage rehabilitation and revitalization and shall at the minimum, address the following: ➢ Accommodating parking needs through innovative actions. Policy C-4.3: The City shall be the lead agency in pursuing the construction and operation of tiered parking structures with mixed uses in the CBD. Locations of parking facilities shall follow the CBD Development Plan required through Policy C-4.2. This policy has been met. Policy-4.8: -The City will participate, along with the CRA, in funding the development of public/private parking lots in the Pineapple Grove Main Street area. Housing Policy A-12.3: In evaluating proposals for new development or redevelopment, the City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. This project is located within the first block of the downtown, which is largely commercial in nature. While there may be residential structures located in surrounding areas of the property, these areas are zoned for mixed or commercial uses, and several conversions from residential to commercial use have occurred or have been proposed in recent years. The parking garage in itself does not generate trips, but will attract trips with the use of retail on the ground floor. The impact will be negligible and should not affect the stability of any residential neighborhood (see discussion under Concurrency Page 6 of this report). However, the garage will be used for parking during events held downtown, which would potentially create traffic flow problems at the end of the event when the garage would be vacated at once. This should be resolved through an agreement with the event coordinators and the City to provide adequate traffic flow. The project will generate odors and noise associated with motor vehicles. In a downtown setting this generally is not a concern and will be consistent with that which occurs in the surrounding area on a regular basis. It is noted, that the structure may in fact block some of the noise that is generated by downtown outdoor entertainment venues from being heard by residents to the north. Transportation Element Policy D-2.2 — Bicycle parking and facilities shall be required on all new development and redevelopment. Particular emphasis is to be placed on development within the TCEA Area. Bicycle parking is has not been provided within the development proposal. Therefore this policy has not been addressed and is a condition of approval. Page 11 of 18 Old School Square Parking Garage 2006-085 REVIEW BY OTHERS The development proposal was reviewed on a preliminary basis by the following groups: Staff Technical Advisory Committee (TAC): At the meeting of July 27, 2005 the TAC reviewed the garage elevations and had the following comments: > Replace mutton style windows with single pane style windows with transoms; > Break up the roof line with parapets (3') or arches intermittently; > Install some faux framed windows on some of the openings; and > Add some additional historic styled features. Downtown Development Authority: The elevations were presented to the DDA at their meeting of August 8, 2005 with a consensus that the elevations were appropriate. However, the thirty foot (30') sidewalk width of NE 1st Street was thought to be excessive; it was suggested that on-street parallel parking be constructed on NE 1st Street to accommodate any shorter trips to the adjacent retail shops on the ground floor. Community Redevelopment Agency: The elevations were presented to the CRA at their meeting of August 11, 2005. Board consensus was that the elevations were appropriate. Government Affairs Committee: The elevations were presented to the GAC at their meeting of August 12, 2005. Board consensus was that the elevations were appropriate. Planning &Zoning Board: The elevations were presented to the Board at their meeting of August 11, 2005. Board consensus was that the elevations were appropriate with the following comments noted: > That on-street parallel parking be constructed on NE 1st Street to accommodate relatively short trips to the adjacent retail shops on the ground floor; > That the height should be increased on the southern entrance to accommodate buses that may use the area during special events, and; > That a decorative gate be installed at the emergency exit on Pineapple Grove Way. Old School Square Executive Committee: The elevations were presented to the Committee at their meeting of August 16, 2005. Consensus was that the elevations were appropriate. Historic Preservation Board: The elevations were presented to the HPB at their meeting of August 17, 2005. Board consensus was that the elevations were appropriate with the following comments noted:Page 12 o?18 Oki School Square Parking Garage 2006-085 > That additional gable ends be provided intermittently, especially on the east elevation, and; > That the west elevation have less architectural elements so as to not visually compete with Old School Square. Pineapple Grove Review Committee: The elevations were presented to the Committee at their meeting of August 22, 2005. The following comments were noted: > That the ramping system be reconfigured to an exterior ramping system (ramps to outer sides of building) in an attempt to shrink the building footprint; > That a more consistent architectural theme for the building be created (large mixture of Floribian and Spanish styles); > That the pedestrian entrance on Pineapple Grove Way was hidden; a more prominent pedestrian entrance should be offered on Pineapple Grove Way; > That the south elevation is too bland and should be more consistent with the north elevation; > That the building be redesigned in order to step the upper parking levels back from over the retail and increase the number of levels to maintain the space capacity; > That a different construction method be researched which might allow for an increased number of levels, a smaller footprint and improvement of the architectural features; > That the type and placement of lighting fixtures throughout the garage be selected so the fixtures are not visible from the adjacent rights-of-way and excess light does not spill out into the neighboring properties, and; > That the garage have its own architectural identity and not mimic that of Old School Square. Parking Management Advisory Board: > The elevations were presented to the PMAB at their meeting of August 23, 2005 with a consensus that the elevations were appropriate and the following comments noted: > That a message board sign be located on the south elevation advising people of upcoming events and the garage location, and; > That electrical power blocks (junction boxes) be located on the roof deck for possible events. Courtesy Notice: Courtesy notices have been sent to the following homeowner's and civic associations. • Progressive Residents of Delray (PROD) • Presidents Council • Chamber of Commerce • Neighborhood Advisory Council • Old School Square Historic District Letters of objection or support, if any, will be presented at the Historic Preservation Board meeting. Page 13 of 18 Old School Square Parking Garage 200E-085 ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION The development proposal is to demolish the existing structures on the site and construct a portion of the existing parking lot in order to construct a five-level parking structure to include retail spaces on the ground floor. The proposal is consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Consistency with Chapter 3 and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development Regulations will be achieved provided the conditions of approval are addressed. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Approve 2006-085 and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan and design elements for the Old School Square Parking Garage, based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3, Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Finding of Compatibility) of the Land Development Regulations, and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. C. Deny 2006-085 and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan, and design elements for the Old School Square Parking Garage, based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to Chapter 3, Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Finding of Compatibility) of the Land Development Regulations, and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF RE COMMENDATION By Separate Motions: Demolition At the Boards discretion with the condition that should the building at 85-95 NE 1st Avenue be approved for demolition, that the structure is fully recorded prior to demolition and the survey details are deposited in the local archives. The survey should include an existing site location plan, measured drawings (floor plans and elevations), photographs and any existing documentary information. Class V Site Plan and Technical Items Approve 2006-085 and the associated Class V site plan for the Old School Square Parking Garage, based on positive findings with respect to Chapter 3, Section 2.4.5(F)(5) (Finding of Compatibility) of the Land Development Regulations, and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan subject to the following conditions: 1. That a photometric plan is submitted showing the selected type and placement of lighting fixtures throughout the garage. The fixtures should be placed so that they are not visible from the adjacent rights-of-way and excess light does not spill out into the neighboring properties; 2. That a traffic statement be submitted; 3. That a replat and alley abandonment be submitted, and; 4. That bicycle parking be provided. 5. That there is an agreement between event coordinators and the City to take measures in avoiding in potential traffic flow problems. 6. That the elevator be revised to meet the Florida Building Code Requirement; 7. That an existing Site Survey be submitted, and; 8 Old School Square Parking Garage 2006-085 8. That LDR 4.6.18(B)14(vi)(4)(b), requiring 50% of the ground floor perimeter adjacent to street right-of-ways shall be devoted to window displays or floor area for active uses, be waived. Landscape Plan: Approve 2006-085 and the associated landscape plan for the Old School Square Parking Garage, based on positive findings with respect to Section 4.6.16 of the Land Development Regulations subject to the following conditions: 1. That the landscape plans for NE 1st Street be consistent with the plans coordinated by the Engineering Department; 2. That Foundation landscaping be included; other than the landscaping nodes in the sidewalks; 3. That Royal Palms replace the proposed Live Oaks along NE 1st Street where overhead lines currently exist; 4. That the proposed tree gates along Atlantic Avenue be eliminated from the proposal and replaced with low ground covers that would add more interest to the plan. The tree cut-outs should be enlarged to six feet (6') by ten feet(10')allowing room for the tree roots; 5. That a parking space be eliminated along the north side in order to provide a mid-block landscape node as this elevation lacks sufficient vertical elements; 6. That an underground support system be used, rather than the proposed above ground support system, or wrought iron tree guards be used; 7. That a root barrier be required around the six foot (6') by six foot (6') planting space to help avoid the tree roots lifting the pavement; 8. That the proposed Japanese Fern Trees be removed from the plan and replaced with a comparable species; 9. That the tree areas along Pineapple Grove Way be expanded to incorporate more greenery and take advantage of the surrounding triangular shaped dead space; 10.That the west side of the parking garage add more landscaping elements; curbed landscape nodes with low ground covers in the striped asphalt areas should be provided; 11. That lines of sight be provided and intersections adjacent to the parking garage be shown on the plan, taking into account the proposed columns and their impact on the ability to see pedestrians and traffic; 12. That a landscape node is provided at a halfway point of the parallel parking spaces located along NE 1st Street. Design Elements: Approve 2006-085 and the associated design elements for the Old School Square Parking Garage, based on positive findings with respect to LDR Section 4.6.18 and Section 4.5.1(E), subject to the following conditions: 1. That an overall color scheme is provided to include all proposed exterior elements, and; 2. That product specifications regarding all lighting fixtures to be installed on the property be submitted. Report Prepared By: Amy E.Alvarez, Historic Preservation Planner Attachments: • Appendix A,Appendix B • Survey, Site Plan, Floor Plans, Landscape Plan, Building Elevations Page 15 of 18 Old School Square Parking Garage 2006-085 APPENDIX A-CONCURRENCY FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1(B) Concurrency as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs of the requested land use and/or development application will not exceed the ability of the City to fund and provide, or to require the provision of, needed capital improvements for the following areas: Water and Sewer: • Water service will be provided via lateral connections to an existing 8" main along NE 1st Avenue and NE 2nd Avenue. • An 8" sewage main exists in the alley which runs north to south through the center of the property. • Fire protection will be provided via existing fire hydrants at the following locations: northeast corner of NE 1st Street and NE 2nd Avenue, on the east side of NE 1st Avenue approximately 200' from the corner of NE 1st Street and NE 1st Avenue and on the east side of NE 2nd Avenue approximately 300'from the corner of NE 1st Street and NE 2nd Avenue. The Comprehensive Plan states that adequate water and sewer treatment capacity exists to meet the adopted LOS at the City's build-out population based on the current FLUM. The parking facilities will have an insignificant impact on public services. Thus, a positive finding with respect to this level of service standard can be made. Streets and Traffic: It is noted that the subject property is located in the City's TCEA (Traffic Concurrency Exception Area), which encompasses the CBD, CBD-RC, and OSSHAD, as well as the West Atlantic Avenue corridor. The TCEA exempts the above-described areas from complying with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. For recordation purposes a traffic statement will be necessary. Based upon the above, a positive finding with respect to this level- of-service standard can be made upon submittal of a traffic statement. Parks and Recreation Facilities: Park dedication requirements do not apply for non-residential uses. Thus, the proposed development will not have an impact with respect to this level of service standard. Solid Waste: Trash generated each year by the entire structure as proposed will be a total of 17,5204.14 tons of solid waste per year. Calculated trash generated by retail use will be a total of 168,300 tons of solid waste per year (16,500 square feet x 10.2 tons of solid waste per year). Calculated trash generated by the parking garage will be a total of 6,904.14 (230,138 square feet x ,03 tons of solid waste per year). The trash generated by this proposal can be accommodated by existing facilities; therefore, a positive finding with respect to this level of service standard can be made. Drainage: Drainage will be accommodated on site via an exfiltration trench system, with an outflow to the City's drainage system on NE 1st Street. There should be no impact on drainage as it relates to this level of service standard. Pcgc 16:y*18 Old School Square Parking Garage COA 2006-085 APPENDIX B STANDARDS FOR SITE PLAN ACTIONS A. Building design, landscaping, and lighting (glare) shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard Subject to conditions of approval. Does not meet intent B. Appropriate separation of travelways is made for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians in a manner consistent with objective D-1 of the Traffic Element. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent C. Open Space enhancements described in Open Space and Recreation Objective B-1, are appropriately addressed. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent D. That any street widening associated with the development shall not be detrimental upon desired character and cohesiveness of affected residential areas. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent E. Development of vacant land which is zoned for residential purposes shall be planned in a manner which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent F. Vacant property shall be developed or redeveloped in a manner so that the future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; complementary to adjacent land uses; and fulfills remaining land use needs. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent Page 17 of 18 Old School Square Parking Garage 2006-085 G. In order to provide for more balance demographic mix, the development of"large scale adult oriented communities" on the remaining vacant land is discouraged. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent H. The City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. Not applicable Meets intent of standard Subject to the submittal of a traffic statement. Does not meet intent I. Development shall not be approved if traffic associated with such development would create a new high accident location, or exacerbate an existing situation causing it to become a high accident location,without such development taking actions to remedy the accident situation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent J. Tot lots and recreational areas, serving children from toddler to teens, shall be a feature of all new housing developments as part of the design to accommodate households having a range of ages. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential developments located in the downtown area, and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent Page 18 of 18 , ► LLi > i-1 > > _� a a— Ci N.W. 3RD ST. N.E. 3RD < ST. ij III II w < - �� > w _ • . , CITY 0 01 • NW ATTORNEY N FT, BUILDING I z 111 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR.DR. N.E. 2ND ST. o r N W 3 In n w 0 > > z Z '� ¢ O — m W a z I- CITY > a a -� - HALL Q z w o _ii IL` / N.E. 1ST ST. MI tiWit ►;;-it .� •.•. F - COMMUNITY w L'NIT o CENTER z Z z ii r TENNIS OLD In STADIUM L j SSQUCHOOL ARE lr//I '" -� Li • z . ATLANTIC AVENUE SOUTH 1111 I COUNTY IICOURT HOUSE Mir. W 3 > > 1 ¢ w > LLl 1r C Q 1 S.E. 1ST ST. j ,l -� i > FIDELITY a o x 2 v�i z M F- FEDERAL 0 - `•I in BANK z N --f1 w LZI L . I a] II Ln In Ln In s" cn N -gimir-- OLD SCHOOL SQUARE GARAGE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM893 �44 Y z•gcDP OWNER City of Delray Beach 100 N.W.1st Avenue 1 Delray Beach Florida 33444 ,r.-', .,gam 't• 4eti _ -a.. .:s. :s; r<Y., - *.� i _ b. .. r m(561)2431040 • r..,'_ tF1 561 241r7221 �,�' ,II��� -: ::;.''�\I',\.4i4Z%; ARCHITECT 7 2 3 4 4.1 5 67 8 - 9 10 11 •13 4 Q Qg QQ Q Q 0 Q Q QQ Q® Q• i s tD' ' 23'-0• 35'-0• 36'-0• 36'-0• 36'-0• 35•-0' 2••-0• • ,v-3- • I;s� \•';%;;;;;; i IkA SA ` 1E 1ST EST savor[ =ti N.EG1STSTREET !1 I. I i %;%::i%:%:%i%:%4::% 54:5:i5:5:„„ Nilli 1,,:4:;45 %;:;:sZ:%si:ins I •• I1 II • [ iEE .• -„� CE I• � :*••••��J �t,,,, .O, .O, ,y„ .O. .O b ^i»;;:: 7 � I F `:S`s:::�T:11 `1:::.SS:`.:`.`.9::`:::??11::TJ:�.'.::::J::�::?::TJ`J:J.`.`::`.1T:S��T:.:',�',�jjJj• i Cfi: N •, ' Iry ill llii.m g• m. viu .•................� w �iiCi��� ;�:'\\4r;G:' . %: 561 9884002 <• • -Ammo I I 561 988 3002 �Bluuuuul : I ;I -! I I I I. :`:^•::::' I, AA o6o33n ••6 1 1 ' I I "1 I "-1 I I !1 11 "`i" I r coNsu TANT / OLD SCHOOL n,,, • i ,vreee, c; SQUARE „A I I PRCPDsm Ewaw:D " h' 1 =l I I PROPOSED FINISHED I• emir•�%� I I FlOIXt ELEV'17 60 .� I I FLOAT ELEV:1715 I1 11 a `,`ir I _ ��`: GYMNASIUM ``', w _ !x 1. 1 •r rill T_ o ia:��` 7 LS I I 1 I I I• `JJ BUILDING ti%: ': Z I I I i i I t �I I� n r:,l F.F.EL=19.71• _ •k4. > 1 I I "1;. I 1 11 II �••'l Q I! I ! ► I ! ! 1I 1• i ;0 I ��%l Q1 ��,l,�. 1- ,I II i .'_- --' ..-_ _-.-..-- ( \ ._- '! 1. iiw\��� E ��'' PROJECT TIRE :%y 9Z — I a I I 1 1 — ! — i _ --_ .M I; . 1•1 Old Sdwd Square 0 Ill w I >--! e1_—I T I -1__ F,— i Imo—IT •• Parking Garage F ( • Q• IiI1 PT I f. . .. . INµ_• a: • ds ,:oz I�.,. Ileaki s w ;%;5� 70• ' I I •I l.•,.,, ). I I g•HEET A3Il. i1 p I :%:%l,. PROJECT HOMIER : %%`%1 718 04014 00 `° f Q >v .a • ! I I I ; 1 �I I•I :�'`` EDB s W PRaEcrE0C0T s, `r- ,- i./ :A •:� , I 1 �j i t I I I !I 11 Y:; I'. a , Delray Beach.Florida OLD SCHOOL SQUARE `� �}�` ! I II ! =I ! j I I !i !! a I! �`l^; IIII' I I I `I I i I I •IPROPosED FW9EDI! '!. w rigs>'• DATE OF ISSUE ' III _1 ii I I •IILmR FLLv:16mi1• .,`,?``,cc�.1 1 '.. w `'� 1121105 : 1^qF II I I II I! 1 v I.. ZI4.��,�,1 �? L: a 44 --. ----------- `_.--• --- _f '-- --- •.� _'.-_.._•-_-.tee.-�= --.t �..::. .--:1 1 .\- 4?%�;�� REVISIONS III I I I ! j iT I ;,. I! r - its / F.I1�I \'\•' m L I �1 >a I9R. II 1 i 1 I 1 i �/• 1 !I 11 I 141 Le_Y 1E ,i T LIr '• s- •G - - Ej LJ i $$�' f1Uhh1I ,1 :!!IJr 'I ' '>.Y - - - - -c- _ — O _ Q ,I • _ _ _ _ DESIGNER 1 I 1 I I ONE II I 11 I • a DESIGNER CHECKED BY DRAWN BY L- 4 I --—} —i--1—_-1—_���-1- ----�-_ 1— 11 1 •I —_1-�—� CHECKED DRAFTER CI 1 -i!— •I I i i 1 N IMMO"• 31"•°r i i !i —T it i ACCEPTED -.-I••-0- 11-11.111'-7.1 12'-6") 36'-0• ) 36•-0- ) 36-0- ) 2•'-6• 110'-6-! 13•0• 111•-0.IL'1 1,9•3- ) 3 a b` ° b 6 a, b b o b „ ;z zoo 13 EXISTING CITY PARKING(FUTURE PAR ) g SUBMITTED BLOCK 76 TOWN OF LNTON N APPROVED OVERALL SITE / GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN .�„� Ir-.t-'K ) 1 �iu a REG.-TRAITOR e COPYRIGHT 0 VIZ SHE ND E 74,15E$F I — Z GROUND LEVELARFA:47,585 SF w LL TOTAL BUILDING AREA:246.638 SF g _ Pr+aEosED PICK.;Dnc RETAIL AREA:16,500 S.F GROUND LEVEL SUPPORT PARKING:20 SPACES- 1 H/C SPACE UO a TOTALPARKINGSPACES:510 SPACES-13 H/C SPACES y v T I 0 ALIff CuSINC IRolrxrc LINE —__. APPURTENANCE:60'-O MAX.TO WDPOINT OF SLOPE _ sT E A ) z S SITE AREA:74,150.62 SF 1 i O O: iAm . . a o SETBACKS:OSSHAD - l %( ) U o kW.WE ::-- ._.._- FRONT-25 FT.(1)• • DELRAY �' '-z I•I — SHEET TITLE SIDE STREET- 15 FT.(1)• BEACH 1 I--- _ ._- SCE INTERIOR-7-1/2 Ff.(1)• gC,ip1 16•liN1mRP Ky RMSi•Y z `- OVERALLSTTE RENT- 10 FL(1)• GRAPHIC SCALE R 0 a GROUND LEVEL •CITY OWNS PROPERTY 0 6'10' 20' 40' •=® S FLOOR PLAN ..o.mw..wo. G a C"7 SHEET NUMBER LEGEND I 21 GENERAL NOTES I 1. SITE DATA I U KEY PLAN I U • 2.1.0 7 . SC( n'... 04, qy g4. OWNER City of Delray Beach 100 N.W.1st Avenue .........,[-„- A Delray Beach Florida 33444 t v, r v Sl: .' r`�* i:J r: c:�3�:�:�3�:�lor3`.`:: �� [TI(561)243704E ., a=3.. ..a.-.... -nas.>..�.i;;:::XW;;41;li:'l i� i [9(561)2467221 "r..... �- . .c �t�iJ`.i\..................f:.i i iii\:.i i.•i�i`i- J, :.. .4, . o J ❑ - ARDN Ecr • .:;i;...... • ptlai igi 32 Ln J4.T 0 (� (7 Q9 10 11 12 13 '-0' 23'-0' Y JS' ' J6' " 36' - 35•-O' 2i-0' 9•-3' yLaa•>_ IVi� _ I .1ST S I T j aeiDta-E ]D7r� N.E1• 1ST STREET II j1 I • 1 1 i II -----it I I >%'si%? %i %? I I�` I j I. i _i © i i_ jj .1 I. „I%s>%:>;:;%siis %, wls.wmmAlmnarSun,T. %� 1 i i I I I I i• j I� %` ' rid° "Y.YT —_ • Z — >' `: 791 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD. , 101•"' T01 � •O• � IO'- 'iY ' SUITE400 - is • BOCA RATON FLORIDA :Js.. SS''P`. -.:�.. ° •' SS'�C .:.5>GLG'.:.Gl::S.....««cc:.L':K:'1.:4!:::::S:Y:::cc<c<cc.1:.:":: - if ,=; ri ,,,,, `.Sti.�.i��i.:i......::::.a/ii.i...../iii////::/„.,.I//I/://II./I�. .....///,• 1= 33487 I' �: I/II//////I/ .\NKiii/iiI%IIi`II`%%%%I N\N\.\.\.\N��v .�N� II/IiI/..I I/..JINNI//i/Ii IiI..4�i`i` NN\\\\N\NNNNNNN \N\�NNN�� N\N��\N�NN\ w ��,.`Si xj � � II ,i,......,...!.„ s :<c....,,......,.............�.. .,.. ...,....._.,.,,,.,.......,,.... � .,,....�--......,...,,,..'�•.�..,.,,.. ........, �5"`1:A.�';: I� [T)561 988 4002 �j // V/. ;E:•. -- — ,---•' --..--—'— '— ,e ® [F]561 988 3002 19 '' u1 uuuu1111 I .I I I I I. i._ ;: •MEDD= i>a ;• I I j '1 _ • 41 1 1 II li >//'WAR �r,-�_■■ i; `' CONSULTANT 171.i� o I I 1 I I I I 11 �:es xIIIIR It OLD SCHOOL°m '' r ;n. --- --1---`Z- --4 j °I a I j I•I li 5: :;..,. I �, C\ ^` iY I I 001'65ED 104006E .+ I ! I I PROPOSED F9+aIIlEDiI ii ;�S�eC'.��`'/ `�`�• SQUARE �;:':`. .1 I I T o04 E6E 17.60 2 I I E1DO EEY 172s Ij II ,,, 7� I _ %i;;:; GYMNASIUM r '_:. —I w I i j r.::`�r, p, LI I I I I I1. I• 5: ;: 1I BUILDING :, Z I 1 I 11 I I• I 1 I• Syty F.F.EL=19.71' • �'�Xti w , Ij I ':t 2 ! I 1 II I. ii`i�fSi 3 ' • •`.'`.•. Q 1 III1-- 1 1 E_V 1 I it 1i I. `%\ I1 1 I. i =1 `., I 1 - ..___ - 1 _IL I._ �''.s5: 'i PROJECT TIRE 1 I 0 :AR:::. --W i-- _ _.---- •i - _-.-. n--..--.^- _- ......-- - _ _-..--._��� --::Na ® O �:%: ;Did School Square jizt ail: I j I I I I i i I � :? Garage C• Z I I 1 ; I I I I. 1 r F��; •�'% u, p . s..E�l I -Ll __ -I I I C .ER 1 I.II x w *01 `' Parking j / I✓/// A/,': _.. _ , ip, .T.. _. I i _ .. :I ... .::.I.. ,.I.... �..,..,.. ., �_.' .::�w.E. 'I:n:! 0. ` �Ii PROJECT NURSER ;`. r 1 ' % - j I I I I ! I Ij 11 718.04014.0E YL •�'\:::""� % '� Z�� :�Iw...J>'�'`3�3 - PROJECT LOCATION .> I I I I i•i ii +> I . r4 �lLLJ�Iur I '`',Sy j, .. ,�-� ! i I ( I 1 I I 1 Ij f1 a 'z,; ;:: oe�FarBead Fl�da OLD SCHOOL SQUARE 4� i I I 'I i j I I it II• ;pi"; a N;y i ��,'t•'S I 1 1 I =:1 I 1 1 11PRoPosm FwmNEnj1 9 Z I i l DATE CFImNE •�. , I'TTOOR ELL-,tsoo•I /� ® I i i i i 1 i i Ii i01 j •1• I I_ Z 11121105 O .--._ —.—.---_-_r— .1-�_. _.-. ---1 __ _ _. - �r 1__—$p 1 4 . REVISIONS � tl..l• JI�I LJI-.._.— I ! �11111 I �J t s 5l w I 1 i �a_ / — L — —i1.--_— •uZlT.� i O ^'. I I / I I• -1 I / MAWAAMAA/./ it li t}(G'� 1- )i F1,1 a , 1 I I II � L I I 1� >` 1,:` ,, r':: A' ill n I I� I I I I I - I ;/� I �I 1I 1 I' j�` a' j� I j 1 1 1 1 I e 1 / I I •I. I 1 ! Imo. I ( I ! i i �, I !i !I i 5 - I 4. . .Uu 1 i j //�� 41/ 1� -��tttli' >>�n1 - r`�'J}IZ �� �S ' 4s --.--- I I �^1 --.-_ -_ I 7. 9 / C 1 I• —I'tl I(Iillllllll������.!I•.II--�i�ii% %/�/��/ //�/ --1 H -EiV _ _ -- _ _ _H so 1-1.1,11� I -ram a TTT DESIGNER ' I II 1 I I I I I•I II I I1 I _ n DESIGNER ._.'.- CHECKED BY DRAWN BY ---a-- — 1 ---1 _L—_-J------1--- -�---- --4.— -L I {I �_�'. CHECKED DRAFTER O O j j I I ! 1 w arD7av• -7•2. i 1 II • I. j ACCEPTED 19•-0. 1 14'-0• 11-Il'111-J'1 12-6-) 36--0' ) 36'-0- ) j 24•-6- 110--6.I. tr-_0.i II•-Cr:, I9•-3- ) s b b ® b b b b (zoo' b 3 13 SUBMITTED EXISTING CITY PARKING(FUTURE PAR ) - 10 BLOC(76 TOWN OF LNTON o APPROVED OVERALL SITE / GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN .L.m. I1'-t1r u m>Q I�uI , i REO6IR/170 /\/�(J)/\ __Lit ' ' IATION OPYRGNRozm GROUBDLSIIEAREAE 74,15E S.F W —I ' ' f co~ GROUND LEVEL AREA:47,585 SF IL�11-1�JI w LL TOTALBUILDINGAREA:246,638 SF — RETALAREA:16,500 S.F U PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE GROUNDLEVRSUPPORTPARKING:20 SPACES- 1 H/C SPACE Q li TOTALPARK1NGSPACES:510 SPACES-13 H/C SPACES ,r y y 0 - �„o,ill, APPURTENANCE:60'-0'MAX TO ILDP0U41 OF SLOPE a - g !,i' £ C a SREAREA:74,150.62 SF g�p _ - SET BACKS:OSSHAD I 71 i5 I U o IwON urt ... ._.. __._.... FRONT-25 FT.(1)• DELRAY a SNET:TTRLE SIDE STREET-15 FT.(1)• BEACH I 1— _ SIDE INTERIOR-7-1/2 FL(1)• 600104 l.lwwrw.ls.ILlYi.a Z `-- OVERALL SITE REAR- 10 Fill)• GRAPHIC SCALE I 0 GROUND LEVEL •CITY OWNS PROPERTY D 5.1D• 20' 40' w a ,� d FLOOR PLAN p CO SHEET NURSER LEGEND I 21 GENERAL NOTES I 16 SITE DATA I ® KEY PLAN ( U /►2 .1.0 T+ = 4. 0. 4y 6E oMT ER City of Delray Beach r" 100 N.W.let Avenue a; - F ' Delray Beach,Florida 33144 CTl(561)243704D : �NuN._ �.aikj4 i i ti `:G:J:GS�G�S!�%� iaA�i>}i �```i�ii ii � �( i • [1(J61)?Qf7221 .`�_� 2yc5: ..[ i � ��} •��y ? i � iR•�i `i � `� . � : � �/ i 5:`,\ma 4 _ ARCHITECT Y 19-041STs$&ET Y "'23-0" T41 ]5-0 0 -0 A J6-0" }5-O" ` •' ' � � `•` . •i••• • •5•�''.•• i i • • .Q(0 i`-0" 72 ] 3I ;• s,y�p-r m,i N.El 1ST STREET !j j• [ NU I I 1 .1 — 1 `I 1 1 iI• I1 _ % ,%%4%vi%>:;is f. >? %' Arts Goodin Al9aldrst}rL — ! ! . I I i! !I sx�T:;., ' / �y Z ),• .5.r_ `� 791 PARK OF COMMERCE i 5 - ® ..W' ..-•.. - O� ' '1�� BLVD... '4 ,,,i. .T. �O SOT ' O� � D SUTTE400 I:L' ,r... Nip,.. - ��: :`r>.. BOLA RATON FLORIDA :1 0:,':j � . Bm I. �`<- _ ••• 13 lL (r)5619884002 s'1 [�7 / `r" I. - t- - ---- -r -.- - - ?' .`:.Y 561 988 3002 ,: 11BH 1I I' j API ; .;/ [I ljllll[[Ijli i ,I ! I 1 i! !1 (.f AA OX0327 al I' I I I t I I it 11 1�`e■, Ir ;i CONSULTANT 1. OLD SCHOOL@ m " -- 'I- ---9 I I I I II. 1 •%` ' / •. • I I PROPOSED FINISHED -'- _i I I PROPOSED rwwlm•I I• ...1 1 SQUARE :'.. 1 1 FLOOR E LV n 60 x { I I FLOOR E EV n.2s Ij I. r..... ',` ' 15_ kill 56 GYMNASIUM •A'I' n : Li I I y I I !I I! • (il;1' ''' BUILDING n % $Y Z I /; 1 I jl I I •I I �I I•• � F \\ % / FF.EL=19.71' / ,4...• W I 1. I. ! .? ! ! 1 I. !' i. �.`'' 17 :.'e'i` 1-- 1 ,, 1 --!--- ----I' ,-._ __._ I -I ! I I 1 I. }i1i: r- / + ,il SII W I i Ir— I V =1 U i I I — - !i — -�4? �;: PROTECT ME ,•_.: /_ -_=W __= I - /� - 1- I1i rTe i `� 4:y Old School Square _�_---- �i.-_---P r,�._..��_.-..r-._...TIN.-.._-_..-' �- , iw Z02 1 i I 1 �� 1 - I I !• I I: '�e(414 ! Q /�'l Parking Garage 1 Hlc, n1 �. "� 1 I I \ dT1''�TAonv I. ■■■■■■■■■ I W �,: j ,///. ZWAli _.,,. �._.__, '' T.:. ...., ' ..7..-.. ......_' '7:..._.. 1,......� .1 ..L .- ._.,_ . ,-I--_._. f :d,.i :!-_- II,:4 `,i ---,Al! PROJECT NUMBER t „JO 4.n� _ �� i 1 i i 1 ! 1! j1 T o r PUWEOTNU B /`1� s..- ,,, ',:T:i'`:. L-' I I i !I I. [ C9 PRaEcrLouTnN a � y � tl ! I I , I I ? i I I II Ij I€ J 3 4 � I I '� i I \ II li Milk 7- a Y a [ ! I I J ! I I I I. :�` a Beach,Florida OLD SCHOOL SQUARE jkY ^ i' I NM` I I , I I I .I j 1 I it rwa6.00'I I I W DATE aIssUE ,4 ® 1 i ! i i i _ ! . 1• . , 1 • z ! 11C11105 -_--_ —.-.-.--.- ._ •• -..-.. - J _ —(Il i LC"!. 1 V I"aiZA REVISIONS J i r pro' --2.i.t — _71— I—._. / ,;1 --!i— �:a':lmu' I:. , I I I 1 I . Try — 1• 1gt1II1. , . lid �1� _� I I I I I I 1 I t' �I h ,,J� ' ' � i i i i i i i �' 1 j! !i ! I Of e, : I i i i i i i W i ,�%. I I 1• 1 I G%' �' ?' j j j j j j i �/ i !i 1 i s'' II u I i i i i i ,,-1 i // 1 !1 I.• I 1. r _F 0.1 } _ , imi.: . '- �� .111L. II I' :: 1 .111• ��-■rI, .- 1:': �6 47SZ 4 J .^ rah}.•.•1� —_ __ —' _ —. 44 � _ _ _ _ _-.A' _ __ ] JLifdi� . I, i— Q • - DESIGNER %%AA I -1 I I 1•' II I• I. I :_� a DESIGNER 11 _..v I,. i, ! ...;:.1 1 L, I.._•a L.: II.,a::._1 .,_I!. L :;, - CHECKED BY DRAWN BY L_ I -- _---1�1—»1-------1---------J-- --1-----J-- - •(---- - O j .! �— i I I I I M aw7r7'r Fait j i it i--t[--—i CHECKED DRAFTER a ACCEPTED aI 19•-0" (�'ii,.-102.'-0- (�1l\ 11(•f11 W-7'II7�1Y-6•(}1 3C-0' /��1l I , 24--6" I10•-6-,• 1}'-0" ! 1--0"•'I 109 3" ! s +6 L'l1 6 l:•l V V 6 soo 6 77�,12 13 P EXISTING CITY PARKING(FUTURE PAR ) . SUBrTTED BLOCX 76 TOWN OFLB4TON a APPROVED OVERALL SRE / GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN Ir-2i-0.0 - d) ..,_I..uV� [Ili _ REG COPTTUwSH'61f1C OLDS • SROUNDLE 74,1ELA50 S.F F- GROUNDIEVELAREA:47,585 SF _ Z - TOTALBUILDINGAREA:246,638 SF II _ - Wtt RETAILAREA: • 16,500 SF `\�r - D P- NE P KOPQiY 1 GROUND LEVEL SUPPORT PARKING:20 SPACES- 1 H/C SPACE 0 a lel TOTALPARKINOSPACES:510 SPACES- 13 H/C SPACES y ,. y I O - 1i6 P�PFRD uNE - APPURTENANCE:60'-0•LIAX.TO MIDPOINT OF SLOPE E T Z „ SITEAREA:74,150.62 S.F ' ;g 44 ' M SETBACKS:OSSH i AD t 5 il 1 U ce WS.UK -__w.,.,- ::.:.... FROM-25 Ff.(1)' D E L R A Y y SHEET TOVE SIDE STREET- 15 LT.(1)• BEACH 4 I- - SIDE INTERIOR-7-1/2 FT.(1)• SECTIOI K,TIANCHIP KS,P L KC Z `- OVERALL SITE REAR- TO FT•(T)• cRAPtuc SCALE S v0 .e GROUND LEVEL vhd •CITY OWNS PROPERTY 0 5'10' 20' 40' �.,m,. • m. ..-is: - FLOOR PLAN o = ,-, SHEET NUMBER +�LEGEND I 21 GENERAL NOTES I 8SRE DATA I O KEY PLAN I 0 A2. 1.0 6'su fq yw.gEp OMER ON of Delay Beach 100 N.W.1st Avenue Delray Beach,Florida 33444 s �) 11 f11(561)243.7040 C a. ^C+: v tip ,... IF1 561 246 7221 e.<.ua<.i.n..nn..as...a:i::iaa::::�:ai1'iG:IR:i��:�:`� ,,��:�: O \ 11.1111111.1P ❑O \ ' • �g ;,,;,, ; ,,,,,\s:':'., ARONTEC7 IC2CI (4.1 Cr) O 9 Q10 (7.0 13 4.4v gazommagi,.0i 105 ,N)it 19'-0• r 73'-0• ]5'-0• 36'-0' 36'-D• 36'-0' JS'-0• `c N'-0• 19'-3• I °1STS EEC ) .Prow�___E awsC N.E11STSTREET !I I• I ;sl ' 1 I•I I•. I e I 0 I I I. I! >%>s`>%��53%:>:�S%�i �- �;�;1j_. I I _ - I :-.I I I• !I I! - I �I ,,,',,' Neva Gmarinamnd.r GLML cam..•:• - I• •I T /;s • e 4 ::2k= /;s`; 791 PARK OF COMMERCE % r�� ® 14.� BLVD.SU 400 a. •0••:rr I r`OR - BOLA RA TON,II. TO FLORIDA Y •vsuri.•:::: ' 4 el .. 33487 . ....a....s>??22:?• ..:.e�cc::::';c::::..•rrr.':.xc:..::::.ce:::- 'e:?c :•'.2::: :22is:::::::::?:a.?:ii<st'.'ri:.. •.. i w - %riP` j r"U11 � �1�'�i •i i�ii viu-�-i���:--- �•�1":�>::.'.>'���:, ' (Tf 5619884002 /r i. ' --_r--___ .- .. — .1 ,T - — ^- _:• - It T 1' / IF]561 988 3002 j; 11111111111 ; 1' 1 ' au, nnlluulDl! 1 I' I 1 I I' :1 AAwwur !. I• I I "I I� •W! I I !I I. 2, • ,c :�5, CONSULTANT rt li, - -I 1 _� I I I i` E I I II II lt, I j OLD SCHOOL. — - -� I , ,j I I •I I ;` ""' ` 1 1 r 1' 1 Gala: "� I •1 I I PROPosa Fw 7.60 =: j �j I I PROPOSED FTN 7.2D'I I• • SQUARE ;%: I I r non ury n bD 7 I 1 FLOOR ELEV 17.n 11 11 ::a: ••• GYMNASIUMatA --I = A I• I 1 : a�� i I I I I I I• „d' BUILDING Z I 1 Ij 1 .'s i 1 1 1•1 I• ! 1 \ ..,. F.F.EL=19.71• Ai: Y W I 1 1j I II.-t ,G = I 1• !1 11 .��, (F LtSj ^'''• Q • 1 I< 1 I 11 1 ..:::1i: ~ It' - - I' ' 4t`,�„ - IJ: PROJECTTRLE Q. .;.:: to I 11 I -1 I ' 1 I I I 11 .:; '' a _I.——— h— : -- )' l•--- .)' ` '�. c r;: Old School Square _ 1 _ I 1 I I Garage t 0 Ee _ Z I t I 1 ; l I 1 II 1. j I_ /, I ,e ' I I I 1 I 1 IL, ' 1 • / <.t ....:/1`�'1�� r sNEE1_ .. ......_ ... .. - Tds>c6rnzn: L. _ 4?4 _ !. W �:�`.: j / J , ` a hilk,,,• ERAP 0 • .I i I1 �• . I 1 TCI MNEFi A2Aa 'I•. ®' ; `,>✓, I PROJECT NUMBER • R%` i j 1• I I I ! I !I 11irk 718.04014.00 • :.. •ar4.- -ra.. ::.M3.1i: L' I I I _I I I !I I. j ;�. I tl C9 PROJECT LOCATION s-. <.. %/ S% %:uc:(:c... I�1' I 1 I 1• ( I I •! I I I !I 1! 'S�t: (_ W ' G #� 1 1 1 \ 1 1_ i j i I. i! )Y .:. EL Delray Beach,Florida OLD SCHOOL SQUARE 64 I I "I I I I ii I. ,14.A�1 ea' I%'`'`%: 'y y' I I I I 'I !• I I I 1PRGPDGFD IwISNEd• )%r. f- W 14•••E;3: DATE O!SSW "�' ® I I I :.I j I I I iInDOR ELEV:16.00•11 • :C,S z ;�;t;�,• ` 121/05 1 , I 1 I 1 �-'�� 1 1 sI j I�I 1 - -1—_.- (141 � =•kmea.'.B \I B ) R1910101s +-:-cry, a ,1;. -1-—' - !' I- 7r• T 2 I i I I I I I IL I �/� I! !I %t«*A ' \,;1 1 ? i 1 I •I I I I I 7r� I .� I I I• ! y� I _ 6' 7s. I I I I l I I I I I I I 1 Po c //� l/ C R'f, I I I I I I I I • ��• I I I 11 I )_ _ 4, .gi - ^ri' I y .a 1 I !W I = II I •,: :•' " I .. I Lc..w...y.;. !•.- IiS 3 '.. 5 t:,. • •--" • rim re- .- T is �.xN s. s;,!a t I I I �� I iiil C 11 c n • i} LJ �jJ _ ;o mm • . It ^1 1e.c a... 84.'• ,-'-:• -- I — Y "_.. l-��'u =7_ -- - - _ - _ _ _ :'..• - ! ! Lori Puu111110R� .....r...... ' - Q `• DESIGNER I/ r I I I I II I 11 I I< ' DESIGNER ...<,I I� 1:. I•Li:I - CHECKED BY DRAWN BY L_-_I_--- —--L—_a------ --i___ ---�- --� _l�� 1�—. CHECKED DRAFTER Ill M I I• I I I I I 1 I I I• I a` ACCEPTED •)! I ! ) 1 _ 2,-6• I10--6-I 13.0.• I• 1•-0 •( 9._-S._j s j t i 1b �2 V1- 4.3 6 a b6 �7 (8) zoo'. Oo V 11 12 13 c, SUBMITTED EXISTING CITY PARKING(FUTURE PAR ) > BLOCK 76 TOWN OF LNTON o APPROVED OVERALL SITE / GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN (t'-ali-dU -,,,,,-41---1 L---- , REGISTRATION v COPTIUWR OM SITEARFA:74,150 SIN co t. 0 GROUNDLEVELAREA:47,585 SI uJ ,2 TOTALBUILDINGAREA:246,638 SI d) t( ..."" - - -Ili- M - RETAIL AREA:16,500 SI n `c' PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE GROUND LEVEL SUPPORT PARKING:20 SPACES- 1 H/C SPACE c_• o TOTALPARKTNGSPACES:510 SPACES-13 H/C SPACES 1, II II '11 0 - D�r•w moRanr uNE — APPURTENANCE:60'-0-VAX.TO MIDPOINT OF SLOPE s i d£ +,� t Z w O a SITEAR :74,150.62 SI - : P FA SETBACKS:OSSHAD € it il ) 4 U .2 R..1oN 1rrC . FROM-25 FT.(1)' D E L R A Y c SHEET WILE SIDE STREET- 15 FT.(1)• BEACH •j CC F ' SIDE INTERIOR-7-1/2 FL(1)' strum 16.1INNsoP.ss.RANGE.0C Z c_ OVERALL SITE REAR- 10 FT.(1)• GRAPHIC SCALE 029000 u 0 I GROUND LEVEL •COY OWNS PROPERTY 0 6'10' 2D• 40' o .� ' FLOOR PLAN C.• SHEET NUMBER LEGEND I . GENERAL NOTES I 16 SITE DATA I ® KEY PLAN I U A2.A.O z . dgEP 4qy OWNER City of Delray Beach 100 N.W.1s1Avenue ' ,r5. E. Delray Beach,Florida 33444 .. 1? / (11(561)243-7040 sr 7r �.iC ,,.�C �.ti�.z._r .: i-.�.a-r< -..•.r, r -4.i.. �. :T>`••T-- +vr>.. :+:7%: .'' `a -, ..:6 s (Fl 561 246-7221 3- ...r 5>:i:%>i�:?i:i�i �w%i:%e`�ti`����'>'>i`i`S�f� i��i�f�i�i�:�f�i�f�i�i�i�$�i3�i�i�i�i �i�i. (; ( ) 9 � NAL (�.4.T 9 ® 9 Q 10 11 12 13 is.-o• 2]'-0• ,� JS'-0• ]6'-0- 36'-O• 36'-0• 35'-0' `C 2a'-O• 9'-3. 1 If..'1STSTREET 1 $ 1 4YE r 1 I'-0 — i aw m,>� N.E11ST STREET •I it I „,::::,:„„.....,,,„,,,„„,, II I 1•1 1i I 'I El I I .1 11 _ `'':v v1s`>': i'iE%:%a��:�5 ';',''i Piula GmdninAl>ond.r6LimL 1 . 1 I II 1� 1 •/ slIntig E >,.,. , ' ° ,7 ..p.N.� ,?,` -1• —J .4� ! 4 �' %` 791 PARK OF COMMERCE ❑ •O�iH \LAV'"...::::'::C'::'S'::S'1k'll%::4 iIiIII}iii,%i`ii,\,i\i%II%Till`/`%%%II/III%II�I .%I%%I%,iI%%%%I%I>I%II`I\I%I\I__117 •�I<iII\I>,iI%iI`I,i`,`%%i/I`%I%I%II%III\ii I ,+,,,aaaaiiii>Iiiiiiiiii`Iiiiili,I�ej u0 u.T >;::>` III _ --a--siiii--- —�s%, -- — •• -- --- — . • . �' IF)561 988 3002 <; : Dill U - I •1 ' m uunnul! I I I I 1 I I• ::::.77. I AA99mmm '( ; ®� I I I i I I !II! '- CONSULTANT Lq. '_ — — i. I I :1 I I I' !I IOLDSCHOOL s`: — �_ I I , I II I I•SQUARE \°':`\ ' 1r I :_.4 1 FEVER ROV 1760 ? p, , 1I ROOK ED UVE 17 OtI! 1 I` wig GYMNASIUM • I' I r> e fri i i = i i i1i. i• ; F.F.EL=19.71• `;YT W �- '`; ' ij I 3 1 I !1 I. �\ ti IN Re:'.:. Q l i I II I j I I !I •11 IVI I- I t I II I• I` �• `J l I ! I� I I iv I I I —Ij j�--- ; �'�„ i Yti�'. vRaEaTmE c E` II, —. :I —_ R�_----- .----_. .T - ._ I I y::::t': —:_ " Old School Square '.,:> ❑ _ I. I ��c.'1 ( Q ��$ Parking Garage 1 jti� 417s.1 i _.. I _..aL, .,.� ._. .,....,._. ,... I E `._ __L..":, _... ........ I_..:. :\ ERTdT.,,,. 1 II-:.._, ti __.It l �%. ,7;s io 092:. a E NCETAza: I i I > 7180401400 1.. M 4 I I I '1 \T, O SZSIsZSi gt05i PROJECT NUMBER w \ I I I I , I I !I I• st n :E:�S`::�:%I I I •E ' II I. �t i6. U' :::4:;:7 PROJECT LOCATION £�� E firei:� 7� 11 I I , • I I I I I I I I C; (= J %;,;1 • ^� i i I = I ii. !• :dr I ' a moo Delray Bead Florida OLD SCHOOL SQUARE %`� f;. ! I. I. I �/; I "`'`'`' .`d 4 ,p 1 , 1 ' ' :I E I I •'PROPOSED FINniEd• „ry I... Q : DATE OF ISSUE '" i ® I I I I .! I I IInDOR EL.:16.001' I W I i i i 1 i i 11 Ii . 'r< (= z OAK 11/21/05 •ate, ;^•., ( —1 ..07 zat-'• 'E— L— ---- �� L—.-- 1x1 r I- B 11i .�>11 REVISING I. � t � FI E I • I I( %I i, 1 G I 1 I 1 1 I ? I j.�� `,, I E E• ' i i i I i i i i !i i! ! is 0 7/ j I 1 j j ! j I 1 !i j!i I !• !JP1 MI C •• MI 10 Ns • y Bl • DESIGNER ' I 1 •P Bff I• I I ! I II• •I@ I. D I n DESIGNER l,. I I I:- 1 .::. I 1 I - CHECKED BY DROWNS! C --4---- I - --f--1-- L--1_-- --4—_------L— 1 E 1 r�� CHECKED DRAFTER M 11 I II _-- I I I I I __ -�--� �_ II I �� - I c ACCEPTED 1 19'-0. 1! 7•--0- I1-11'I 11'-7•112'-6-1 36'-0- 1 J6--0- 1 36'-0• 1 24-6- I10--6-I• 23-0- • 1,-O• I 9•-3- 3 b ala b b d b b zoo' e b - b r 1 2 3 3 4.7 5 6 7 B 0. 11 12 13 EXISTING CITY PARKING(FUTURE PAR ) > BTTm BLOCK 76 TOWN OF LINTON APPROVED OVERALL SITE / GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ,,m.�, It'• ' .. REG6TRAlgN �J I COPYRIGHT REDO GROUNDLE 74,15E S.F r[� � �III� — Z GROUND LEVEL AREA:47,585 S.F (WI \ ,e-•=,-=„e/I'L_E% TOTALBLI DIHGAREA:246,638 S.FV. to '� RETATLAREA:16,500 S.FPRoP U PROPERTY PaoP1T AVE GROUNDLEVELSUPPORTPARKING:20 SPACES- 1 H/C SPACE o TOTALPARKINGSPACES:510 SPACES- 13 H/C SPACES 3 el. y O a CUSTWC PrsoxRIY DK — — APPURTENANCE:60'-0'LIAR TO MIDPOINT OF SLOPE , 4 €'F li 0 SITE AREA:74,150.62 SF : P 5 SETBACKS:OSSHAU ) ;;;1 .1 2 U m 1,,,011,1E _.._ ._._._._.•._.-_•,_ .... FROM-25 FT.(1)• • D EL R A Y 55 TRL. SHEET ME SIDE STREET- 15 FT.(1)• BEACH i'I M f- SIDE INTERIOR-7-1/2 FT.(1)• YC1ID116.TD+Ns1®KS.RN..aC_ Z `'' OVERALL SITE REAR- 10 FT.(1)• GRAPHIC SCALE ov F.• GROUND LEVEL •COY OWNS PROPERTY 0 S'10' 40' 40' .:m '� ' FLOOR PLAN C) a .7 SHEET NUMBER LEGEND I 0 GENERAL NOTES I 16 SITE DATA I U KEY PLAN I U /'12.j.O • t4 . OWNER City of Delray Beath 100 N.W.1sl Avenue I ill, Delray Beads,Florida 33444 '- m(561)243.7040 ate. , :, r L4`i.:a:-.. .. ,,, .4:.w,.. [� 561 246.7221 :�••1�:F�I..�y,.�S.'(` - - -/r- ..-..Ji'G`i'CL�i�S�iJn!J{!�:�:L�:f:.`M'`1:�:`'?w`i�i�i�.'di��i✓:ii�<�����'� .��K�� ?� `i` 1 ARCHITECT T Q i l 6 Q Q ® Q Q Q ,D „ ® ,s4�o :4=�=�%23:5:�:�:�:�:�:%2i 44 t 9'-O- 7J•-0• •-0• 36'-0- 36•-0- ]3' - • 2..-0- • 19'-3• �:azgazi Isis • 4 ^y IS 1 ■ion c • saati N.E[1ST STREET 1 li I Itgi II illi MI I I•I I. ,- I _1 I I �I II i`'I:•wly:%:): :i:.:3:>:.;.:.:a;140614411 t PwwGmrriRAlmnd.rstrm,l. I • I IT 11 11 . .;.;;;,VVV'Vi %:% `'` /,t •;YSS. :,. ,<'l .:...r�• 1 ;!,, •53:::::3:.:. 791 PARK OF COMMERCE :a.s.- • .•.. A.' ,O• rl:".......... iO4 r0; •'/'`/`>3`:, s>s.':r:t:� BLVD.SURE 400 1 tot •d ...1', i.,t. s. a •`i1 S:3 • .....a' ::T`:: rrs. .N, `::�% .C• BOLARATON FLORIDA I i /l.:' •` , /I/iii/`iiiii`ii/ `ii`ii iii`ii`i""'`i`ii`i`i`i`iiI`i /`i/ii`iii/`i/`iiI`Iiiii`iiI`i/`i "" ` ' '1 ��'����' C:S' ...�.. .F 33487 �'is• � s -I ■ C. 4 � - 51 / / - - �( - — ::- -::— el — � ,::::; /1'al [F]5619883002 OP ,: a unarm - I• I .........[ I I I I I• .S11K: I `.� AAoom3n •-. I I I -.I - I I it li `-rq"a■ I? ,��1 CONSULTANT I I • 1 i I I I I• �.^ OLD SCHOOL m / - — I I i I I II li �: I If .: %• ;': : it !' I s Q — •E I 1 PROPOSLo PUSHED j I I PROPOSED E Nor¢n•I I• `:,/ i '�/�.' $ UARE .•:: now L EV:17.60 2 ww uav n.n I I ....B , GYMNASIUM —I L'I �! I II I Ii 11 ■,,,, I a • Li 1 1 c.782; I I 11 I1 s. i ; BUILDING :v : z •\., ; I • I -.Ki i i •i i• I'``' FF.El=19.71• ,4i.K.a III I ! ! _C ! 1 1i ii I ���. w i INN � I �- --i- 1 i--- i I 11 I�!' .. I= KK C% I I• I eI 1 I I --_. --�I ',li.-' {J? I r:'I PROJECT TITLE Q —© �LI! -I --PJ Square41 Parking Garage EZW:z z • I. _I.• .-..-..., _ I-_.: ,::..a .".ql 1!-0.,. p HI: '`'`'`' vrsaEcrNUNeER tstuziiii 1 1 O 718.04014.00 I. I I• I ROJECTLOCATON: I I II li ;f.• - -1 SDI; '•x` /. MI!'' s I I I I 11 iI .:I I a Delray Beach,Florida OLD SCHOOL SQUARE %` ? 1 1 1 i I I A II 11 I"- a I I I I I I 1PRDPOSED Fw6HE01' .0%.• I I' W 11Z5ZA2 DATE OFISSUE j ty : I ;® 1 ! i •;i I I �ifDOR ELL,1D0Ii •■. ,'j, i' z_ 11121105 �. — -------- --- • =s U: --�--- :: .. �r �..� _•.. __�e..� I� ? ---- s - Y� ` 1_ e REVISIONS "tie T - I - - ^I ...ka \ �>. a;nrl R ;t- I-- I- / / L i1-..-_ jib';.� I } Ill . 1145:o' ji 1 I I I I I a I �</ . , i 1—��� I cG15 �•� r:•� I 11 I I I I I L I / 'j%/ I I 1• I I F2,I F / I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1• I. 1! I a �� I i i i i i i is i !i i! i I ' a. I ^ .ti,> I ��[ I I I dL UIIiMI :1iiFi1 — —I � ‘1 earNi•R'� • ., --% 'MI I ,.� • _ L_ O _ DESIGNER T • I 1 I I • 11 1 Il 1 i' a DESIGNER :....._I I 1 «. I I,: L_:;:. I ,::. 1.... I .,•,._ I I,::.... .- CHECKED BY DRAWN BY 1 —1--..L--�-------1-- ------1--------1---_ I iI l li...,—�---- g (---�---- -4 CHECKED DRAFTER 0 o I II -� 1 ! 1 i i N mafJOr• . I 1 !I 1 iI i < ACCEPTED •(,�L1 19-0 /,,L1� _o�.-0- (e1`111-I1'I 11--)-112--6•(( (J�/ �1 /lu • ll 2:•-6• I10'-b-! 1J•-O" i ,'-0•li -'-3- ) s a a V b 4.7 l:l O 6 V som-D- i' ,I,(..,2: ,3 EXISTING CITY PARKING(FUTURE PARK) (VVV� > SUBMITTED BLOCK 76 f TOWN OF LINTON APPROVED • OVERALL SITE / GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN If-21/-4f0 I I , REGISTRATION SITEA —LLIJ COPTiIGHI 0365 GROIN EA:74,150 S.F = GROUND LEVEL AREA:47,585 SS uJ ,, TOTAL BUILDING AREA:246,638 S.F �...R.,....o — _ PRorossu PROPER4 U1e RETAIL AREA:16,500 Sf U GROUND LEVEL SUPPORT PARKING:20 SPACES- 1 H/C SPACE 0 0 TOTAL PARKING SPACES:510 SPACES- 13 H/C SPACES • ( y y 0 - ,,,D, n,,,� _. APPURTENANCE:60'-0•WkX.TO MIDPOINT OF SLOPE E I Z c SITE AREA:74,150.62 SF si :I - 0 SETBACKS:OSSHAD p $ V wra 1Aa -- - FROM-25 FT.(1)• DELRAY ;`Y� -- SHEET TITLE --- - - -- - SIDE STREET- 15 11.(1)• BEACH I = SIDE INTERIOR-7-1/2 F1(1)• SECTION 16,TIN...44s.Roo.4x a. OVERALL SITE REAR- 10 FT.(1)• GRAP1IC SCALE 0 - GROUND LEVEL •CITY OWNS PROPERTY 0 S'10' 20' 40' m ® •� V a FLOOR PLAN ..a o t/A SHEET NUMBER LEGEND I 21 GENERAL NOTES I 16 SITE DATA I U KEY PLAN I 0 A',A.O pq,•V. OWNER City of Delray Bead) 100 N.W.1st Avenue ��F.: 3i,'. / i.ti . yrvT" ��JY : �..•nl •u. .• / . ;{tE3_ y. "i•� ' s \I�\�:♦ >nSiy,L♦triGipht,J5v ,`;>5:A3. AR;:;:;:::;� `y Delray Beach Florida d a 33144 m(561)243101E IF](561)246.7221 Q 1W ,� ARCHITECT 1 2 3 - 4 4-7 5 6 8 9 70 11 72 73 Q 4 49 Q 4 ° 401 9 Q9 Q9 Q 19'-0" I3'-0" JS•-0" 36'-0" 36•-0- 36'-0" J5'-0' 2{'-0" 19'-3" IE.1ST STREET s sy0lsr E JDI�i N.EL 1ST STREET II 1• I _ ---- I• I ,%i f•'s i %::z�'si':ff :: i 1 N it �, w.,-rr ._V.__._----t,__ 1 I { �(���.I�� ..,,,.,,, ,U:z% EL ' I I I• 11 1 1 _ p❑ I - I I- Ij I ` >.a i.:%a:�::?' a Para GoodtNiNNAlmridr6t17t1b 377 I - 1• 1 I I T 11 11� -�,_ L •YE l -ti-♦ ;jam y,� -- r, - -- �..-� 791 PARK OF COMMERCE ::i ❑ :O:•^<• ie. it r 7:•l.'.`:♦: 0: L0: ♦r.,♦, ciil-S f > �♦.•`• 00 cS.'! I�,Ll • .::..;'ll♦::♦111J:.. ..♦..♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦r♦♦. .. ., IIII,•» :r,::,'::1♦♦.r♦.:?J.:`.:`JJ-_....,♦r♦♦r rr♦♦.♦rr♦r rr♦♦.r....... :.:L`:♦` `1♦`i :::.♦.♦♦.`.57.`:.. -. l :. ��?=•'' 'BOCA RATON,FLORIDA .`.`i:?: I'i:.::a .`.`.:":` `S":.::5.?`�S`.SSS`.J;i - % -�. '♦`-•• ri` ♦ ri♦riE♦♦iiriirrr.; r♦ia�',i„ii�:�riiii`i "`>,�'�i `i ` py»».N.. ..,,,♦,♦�„�„♦>,..n,,,>.•.,,,,,,•.,,,,,,,,,•!,,,,,,e rrrrr;vrrririirtir♦irri♦ii♦♦ r♦♦♦r ♦{-•,>♦r.. .� II♦I i L 7 rsiiii:::�::::.si:.:J.J.`JJ:.iJ:ir♦.♦,r♦♦:iiiiiu`i�J•LjL::SS:J::.::T JJ4:?Ji.J:y.i::.J.J.".r♦..♦♦♦<.♦.♦♦♦rr♦rr♦r♦♦♦♦♦r♦♦♦r♦r.♦♦♦♦♦. . 3348 A. - � f*Iiir a „( 0, ,_-,_ .' ... .,�' ..�•���� >}• - 5619884002 IIII .. .. ,>jf'`'. c/r' / 2 3:/ ,— - I I I t — - --- —-,---et t' -—— --— a y ,:: E �' / �'( [F1561 988 3002 / fg r s: D uuR DT - I I ;;yll muunm I I I I I 1 I. ::rTJ::.`'J I C I I I• 1 I I II II l�x'�'� ;%. aN OLD SCHOOLS m _ — i i i i I I i• ••wgiILEI` L / - : •• / I I PROPOSED FW61.8 .:t t _I I I PROPOSED FwaHEG•I I• //' '• :I I _ 1 FIDOR EIEV:1]60 �.O I I FIOGR E1EV:1725 I' 11 > l >�'%N j GYMNASIUM ice: : Ei 1 I - z I 1 1 1f 11 r♦iii . - ♦`t' BUILDING Z I ' i I I : I I I I• I` �`' C k p . L F.F.EL=19.71' J: ;, W I •y •11 I 5.0 1 1 II 11 ' :2::::: I I 11 I I• 1 11 1•1 `'�':� : I - -- 1' I I• i i 13 1 7 •I --- - .ri•` �:1i PROJECT TITLE O i Ml` _�_—--��.!-�- _r r— - m —_ 1:771 1 -- I y:.` -Is: Old School Square Z 0 i j 1 �[ l a 1 1 I III. II r>�:)�(.: (' Q >'• Parking Garage C • ItY.E1 I I I I dI.A II 1 Is W is .„, fO.7.4 1.• ! _I _. 1 1 1 ER 101.1EETAtIl{ -11_✓;.• : a.I}, > PROJECT NUMBER / mtir 1 I I I m Ip$ 718.04014.00 'S- T' I I1 I1 I. s PROJECT LOCATION71 �i I ! i iCi i i i 1 1 I- W I I I I ) I I I 11 11 .�yl'. I s Ja Delray Beach,Florida OLD SCHOOL SQUARE I I I I i I I 1i i•1 WA'�: (= aQ i s` , I I I I ; I I •4 :T . ' ir♦iI• a3 xI [� I III k w,,111, -- . ' .>„f -Y tl 1 �\ 4. RP/IS/DNS ' A rr.i' -A -23t1 - i- y-- —-�/ - � iuu I r j�j r is 1 I I I I I 7-U Ij�� —��NT� •i: I j f j I f j 1 '/ �z• I 1 11 i I is '�'� I I I I I I I > I I 11 11 I ( a jf n a _ I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 11 11 1 1 a> _ .. 1 I • I I 1 I / •lilidis, p�j!7.:<♦-�r,__�.-u..♦.♦-.♦u.«: > > • 1a :enr I • I I •I �! iu nEr ( A rE rye= Y `t VI./ u h14 ' - H IRAIM I '1::::%uW. 1 = _fi . . — ._ ` T!L.IH!R I n O • DESIGNER r v I I I I 1 I•' 11 I• 1 I . DESIGNER _ CHECKED0Y DRAWN BY �---.- I — ----------+--- — --- - CHECK ED DRAFTER 0 I — i. --- I 1 I 1 I w!iW a0•■ •o7i7 I I I I. j a mane) ) t9•-0• II 24'-0- 11•-11-I 11•-7-I 2-6"I 36--0- ) �1 J( I4'-6" 110•-6"I IT-0- 1 1•-0-11 19'-3- I 0 2 5 0 4.3 6 �5 (J V zoo e c 11 72 13 m EXISTING CITY PARKING(FUTURE PAR(B)) SUBMITTED BLOCK 76 TOWN OF LI NTON o APPROVED OVERALL SITE / GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN M.�1�> i,'-mr 0 — ''''''''''......,. .0..,! m..ml u REGISTRATION (\/���J�\/ [IliCOPYR1GNi CM GROUAOLE 74,15E SF W c,.'Y Z GREARFA:V74,150:47,585 S.F fL; LL TOTALBUILDUiGAREA:246.638 S.F �. - +V`'—,= g _ RETAILAREA:16,500 S.F = PROPOSED P"OPQi�11'f GROUNDLEVELSUPPORT PARKING:20 SPACES- 1 H/C SPACE p o TOTALPARKINGSPACES:510 SPACES- 13 H/C SPACES W W W 1 0 PROPER::WE APPURTENANCE:60•-0.MAX.TO MIDPOINT OF SLOPE Y Z 2 SITEAREA:74,150.62 Si DaSMG ' ` 3 51 a O SETBACKS:OSSHAD °s U o° NAP.LNE :u...;,...:-..:s.�.:.,-r.:.-s FRONT-25 Ff.(1)• • DELRAY .--• • 1 OHEET TII E CC SIDE SIREEI- 15 F1.(1)• BEACH I 1- - SIDE INTERIOR-7-1/2 F7.(1)• sECNR1IA UMW..6s,I...{x Z `- OVERALLSITE REAR- 10 FI.(1)• GRAPHIC SCALE mu.. 0 - GROUND LEVEL •CIIY OWNS PROPERTY 0 5'10 20' 40' N.m ..e FLOOR PLAN m""" o a C7 SHEET MOLDER LEGEND I 21 GENERAL NOTES I 16 SITE DATA I U KEY PLAN I (1) A2. .0 c, OVRIER City of Delray Beach i 100 N.W.1st Avenue Delray Beach Florida 33444 I�561 243-7040 x 1',- ( 1 .i"r.s..iS,s....drew',' }5:1�� .,x-Nts`.'� ,;,T, g„�.`.�•�:c3E�e�.; ='9-^:y;i�,.i;i��.�r>�r�,;'4,4r4�4,4�:�;;:;",i,•, [7 cc !• Y) el[Ka, Y-.' ....., ..t,-v .. •�.}.t.,.. 7..S j,T:v-•..:_ link'\ I'J JUt 241T7221 =w•�.:ii: _ .-`ilS�i.�i?i]i:S:%I:I:S`✓::GI� a<J�iy`,iJ�C:A:w�i?L\i?i>:�:-d\i�i�,., ( 1 �.�'1.y"zy .SkK 1O \�� '—r ,.V.4- i�i�ie:[�<�i�I>�h), !�i�Y�i�i "�� Li i \--/ �i43!�]i i?%i:%%'. ARdYTKi Y Y9 Y?'_ Y 9 ° Y Y Q,D „ ,2 ,3 19'-0 ( • 36•-0' 36'-O- 36'-0' 36'-O• 3•-0' 2,1-0' ,9•-3' tfo1 11.1ST • s I � �otoif •I I• I N.E 1ST STREET l ,.:..:,_ �._�_._�_ ��_,���•.�_,w.L.��.�1., ,°I: I •1 e. .�.,_— �--t --'--fit-- i f I •I NIA •i I� _ I °-1 0 i I .i iI _•I%:I 1111 bl ifl i�l ill%%_%v%% , P.mG9odrFnarmd.rstlea. 511111�25,5 ry I 1 I I II !1 �SSY2 2 g�R k ' a� Y S1 • > �■ i', 791 PARK OF COMMERCE �x<...: ❑© �e;:2)•••::::::::::::::::::.;:•°•••••1::::r.*:;::::). • ' P1 :c<:::::::r• :O° 0 .y:.,,.... '^:.�..::. �<: i. BLVD.SUITE 400 BOLA RATON FLORIDA - '',a'sate>: f.A�`:'N'S',':!X,S':::: lLiiiir �: 33487 4 I ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,r,�,!:::�%�:�S4Y1tS�St„SSL'1llt,LY.,,ulC��CS'CS'SLL�t��!�'1KiS:i��:SL"'��..,,,,,,,a,,,,,•,,,.. � I - (_. .����,r 5619884002 % % / '' uumuun - :: ::-- �( " " — I I V' 1'':IZ 561 988 3002 / ,:ie:, l4nlJHn-- I I ! -! I 1 .1 I. %: j'`i IAAmm3v 6> I ' I Iiii t ( I I I I. ,. I. CORSULTANT OLD SCHOOLS Lgi m —� i =i i a{ I I !i• 1! `aiI. % •= SQUARE ,`. ' �'I I -- i FO PROPOSED F°760 jISHED `p ! I I I r"woa° E°IVA 17.72s°II II :III ' >%;GYMNASIUM ?: w (i I 'R, I er to I I I !I •I! •� - \BUILDING z I ' ( I I! I II !I I! b I n E.E.EL=19.71' _ 'S j ` ' . I' I e'� ;` f I I !I I! ' sr � ! a •i i -+ !I - !I !! T I : II• -- .. ! -! i� , ! ! .1 Feta I~ PROlERT1RE Q . R _, . ---. , II:_�.._._a�. _.� I— _ -I �,^_f-- - — — :a$�: —: ZJ/ `': PdSdadSquare arking Garage sL•,y, z I i I I , I I II 11 ' ,. I `'; I I r`3 I i I I I / Q► B,q J, ` o ds.E A 92 I!.,< is w r,;s%6,v.j / / ::% J0 I._„...... .......`_..,._.,.1 _..,.,.i..,..«. `.I i .f- I I FA 101'9EF,TA24 II PROJECT NUMBER �:is— ❑ '� 1 I I I ' I I.I I. • 116.04014.00 r1r;tip ;...:. - ii i i I. l ;;;?r�i;;;i;, I 1 _I 1 1•1. 2: U' PRaEcrEoulDN G � � I i i I , ! � 1i i! 5:%< ;_ %� �'' Beach,Florida /./ V✓♦! I I I I I i i I i I. I! :PJ as G,:; :'•: Y OLD SCHOOL SQUARE , I I I= < : I I I I I i I I IPROPOS➢1wsHEd• .� I__ w �, DATE OF,SSUE I . • i I ! '! l i I i..E,, ...! z t•" • i 4 I I _ I i ii !I• •• I y ttntros 7,.—.--.— —.—.--I .� �. -_s v �.. = - —_— : -r \-— ,0 N.' .. REV0W0S • 3' sz I I I j -1 I I, 1cCj-CR II rk�,IN 1 `i r ` i ! ! ! I I 7e� I °', �; ���• 1 o I I I ! I i _5 I ' I I' 1 IS Pr-4 • •: = WgiflI •a r< I I I �% "` L357.L".a?_......`:`,,,,SS`Y.�`,...`.:>::, I,. /�1 a _.., . k.0 i `: , ( "y • _ ` '- Il •. I I // � 1 iiim- � �IIII syeu�wi ( �•' ix • r„... �,, i_. .. t�c„,„, - i a .. "`� L _ _ _ _ . . ! 11111111111111�• '" ��I f _ ,�i - -_ __ _ _a __ _ - -, - -�a4_ - _ _ .^.D � — Q ' DESIGNER I I I I P I • 11• I I t' r DESIGNER • u. I 11 .. ._:,: _I .. :_I I 1 _ _ I I, II. I 11._ I. a. CNEC620Ar DRAWNsr ---�--— !1 f --i- f -j-------- ----- ----------i- I — -! - i-------� CHECKED 0 0 i I. i ! i i i M°°°'''�■ i°''t i i ! ir- i O DRAFTER N ACCEPTED 1 19'-0• I• .�'-0- it-11-111•-1•)17-6-j J6'-0• �) 36'-0' j JJIB� 2e-6- 110'-6 ,13 •!I1'-0-)` 69=3- ) 3 - - - a a � 6 6 �5 V 6C ) �Om 6 ,1 ,2 13 EXISTING CITY PARKING(FUTURE PARK() > SUBMRIED 6Locx,6 fl 1OVIN OF LINTON APPROVED OVERALL SITE / GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ti.m,�, If a REGt9TRATpN ' I -I CDPIRIGHI CD?S SITEAREA:74,150 Si �..mom,T`--', —[Ili i-GRWNDIEDLNGARA:4, Sf W - TOTAL BULLDIXGAREA:246.638 SF � — REfALAREA: 16,500 Si' Pao ° _- GROUND LEVEL SUPPORT PARKING:20 SPACES- 1 11/C SPACEPROMS.D .3 TOTALPARXINOSPACES:510 SPACES-13 H/C SPACES I r : f i C APPURTENANCE: AM D..PROPERAPPURTENANCE:60•-0'UAL TO WDPOWT SLOPE SITEAREA:74,150.62 Si' r 4 4 ' q O ; i cc =LI SETBACKS:OSSHAD ;0 : I U o IP FRONT-25 FT.(1)' ' D E L R A Y y= ' sHEE1TmE N.1a uIC SIDE STREET-15 FT.(1)• U E A C H ) EC G SIDE INTERIOR-7-1/2 FT.(1)• SEMEN IS.,w1m9P.cs.RM..]E Z - OVERALL SITE REAR- 10 FT.(1)• GRAPHIC SCALE o GROUND LEVEL *urn OWNS PROPERTY 0 15'10' 20' 40' K T o S FLOOR PLAN mimminitri C7 SHEETNU4BER LEGEND I 21 GENERAL NOTES ( 16 SITE DATA I ® KEY PLAN I U /►'. "O • OWNER'S CONSENT AND DESIGNATION OF AGENCY (This form must be completed by ALL property owners) ` , the fee simple owner of the following \- lA l N,c) p (Owner's Name) described property (give legal description): Ld'T 23 , RLooLK (0) Dew ._s_�4 PikR:K.) ,e c ©c . '-rr i-1 RAT "Ti-- E RE .O c REe_©Ra D lei R - - 8Oo(a S h'T G c)1:-.- I:4U-LA BE..kei-c C / � I--d R D hereby p tittion to the City of Delra Beach for variance appr al for (Project Name) ' I l y 10 i;S�-1 �I I'V-Tt5Q, 11v F Nub. -RA NCH -"L6rzl bA and affirm that 1.0 �� _ R•t Lit,)IDA . t1REIA (Applicants/Agen 's Name) is hereby designated to act as agent on my behalf to accomplish the above. I certify that I have examined the application and that all statements and diagrams submitted are true and accurate to the best of my k owledge. Further, I understand that this application, attachments and fees become'p rt of the Official Records of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, and are not returnable. (Owner's ig tur ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged b remQ�this fcu-t R,TE l2-t, day of ( C�P-F2 , 200 f bOi_1I\}C) who is personally known to me tiollemipEoclucod (typo of ideRti ieation) as identification and who did take an oath. IIIQ-,/ , � /�Q. // (Printed Naarr e of Notary Public) (Signa of N tary Public) J Commission # , My Commission Expires (NOTARY'S SEAL) :ootr^i� Notary Public State of Florida • Marg,:eme B Bell fie` MY i :71missan DD434886 or Iv Expr:>>u7/11/2009 -6- DECEMBER