Loading...
HPB 06-15-05 44 oe. AGENDA 0 .� _ P HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING 'ar �� CITY OF DELRAY BEACH / Meeting Date: June 15, 2005 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: City Commission Chambers Time: 6:00 P.M. The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service,program,or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Randolph at 243-7127(voice), or 243-7199(TDD), 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing,such persons will need a record of these proceedings,and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Two or more City Commissioners may be in attendance. I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • June 1, 2005 III. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. The Sewell C. Biggs House(212 Seabreeze Avenue),Virginia& Erskine Courtenay Consider the Designation of an Individually Listed Property in the Local register of Historic Places (Quasi-Judicial Hearing). IV. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. 101 NE 5th Street, Del-Ida Park Historic District, Virginia Ritter Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of storm protection. B. 114 NE 1st Avenue, Old School square Historic Arts District, Roger Cope Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness, Class V site plan, landscape plan, design elements and variance request for the relocation of two historic dwellings to the site of a contributing building within the Old School Square Historic District. C. 145 North Swinton Avenue (Mako Technologies) Old School Square Historic District, Jeffrey Silberstein, Agent Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness, Class V site plan, landscape plan, design elements, and demolition request for an addition to a contributing building within the Old School Square Historic District. V. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS A. North Del-Ida Estates Plat, Del-Ida Park Historic District,Andrew Spengler,Agent Forward a Recommendation to the City Commission regarding the proposed plat of North Del-Ida Estates(Lots 11-16, Block 2, Del-Ida Park). V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS • Public Comments • Reports from Historic District Representatives • Board Members _ • Staff VI. ADJOURN j\Oilt�,`•) r _A Posted on June 10,2005 Warren Adam , Historic Pfeservation Planner DELRAY BEACH L O R I D A All-America City 1 r® 1991 2001 SIGN IN SHEET Regular Historic Preservation Board Meeting REGULAR MEETING June 15, 2005 PRINT FULL NAME ADDRESS OR ITEM NO. ORGANIZATION ,4) .1-31.3c,c7-1Q / // ?- (\) • c.- 13. ' ( I - 'NI , G 3r t I 14190 (ItitAQ-71 0<titC, • \ �� 11 / C,- / Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines 0 SECTION VI: NEW CONSTRUCTION New construction, including additions to historic resources, must meet the APPLICABLE SECRETARY OF THE current Florida Building Code and the current zoning requirements that INTERIOR'S STANDARDS include setbacks, lot area, frontage, etc. 4 NJ New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction 2 The Secretary of the Interior's Standards advise that replication and ( shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. '� mimicry are unacceptable approaches to new design. That concept may — A The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall seem unusual, as many think that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. be compatible with the massing, size, scale and architectural i P, features to protect the historic integrity of the property. 3 History is a continuum, where today's contributions will at some time in the future, be judged for their impact. Without a clear distinction between what .. t New additions, and adjacent or related new construction shall is historic and what is contemporary,development patterns become blurred be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, and the outcome can create a false sense of historical development. The the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its guidelines allow for a wide range of interpretation. Some communities environment would be unimpaired. that apply these standards have taken a very conservative approach in n' handling the design for new additions/construction.They have maintained that by the subtle differentiation of surface textures, or the simplificationlk New construction refers to new buildings, structures (outbuildings) or `r or stylization of ornament, that a distinction can be made and still be in additions to extant contributing or non-contributing buildings that are compliance with the intent of the Standards. `'?; constructed on vacant lots within a historic district, or on an individually listed historic site. When a new building is constructed to fill in the gaps of For additional information, or if you have questions, feel free to check with '' a streetscape in a historic district, the new building is referred to as"infill" construction. the city's Historic Preservation Officer. ; Additions - All infill must be compatible with the surrounding buildings and yet must be t ' differentiated from the historic building stock. To be successful, this new i design should reflect the significant themes in its environment and will Historic preservation recognizes the evolution of a property,and subsequent include attention to: owners of historic resources are part of that evolutionary process. During the course of time, frequently additions have been made to historic r • Height properties because of practical need and changing economic status. • Materials • Roof form In the design process for new additions, the following guidelines should • Massing be observed: • Set-backs • Rhythm of openings (i.e., doors and windows) • Locate an addition as inconspicuously as possible, usually to the rear • Relationships of solids and voids or least public side of a building. • Scale • Orientation 47 f , I f F . . Program Do's and Don'ts I The City of Delray Beach Page 1 of 1 fr Get with the Plan . . . . Planning and Department Home I Contact Us I FAQ's I Mission +.... For Visitors [For Residents 1 ! For Businesses PLANNING ZONING City Home> Departments> Planning and Zoning> Historic Preservation> Program Do's De• - 1 pn ents !Choose a Department Program Do's and Don'ts The Historic Preservation Program Does Application Forms • Encourage adaptive re-use of historic buildings. Boards&Agendas • Provide forms of relief such as the granting of waivers and varian Census 2000 properties. DCA Notice of Intent of • Offer financial incentives through the City's tax abatement program. Comp Plan Compliance • Require administrative or Historic Preservation Board (HPB) rev Downtown Plan alterations. More... • Offer restoration and rehabilitation information to property owners t preservation design guidelines. • Require HPB review of all demolitions, relocations, and new constri • Enhance community recognition and pride. • Maintain the character and scale/development pattern of your neigl- • Improve the local economy by promoting tourism and garnering City's architectural and cultural heritage. • Offer staff and on-line assistance relating to historic preservation is: • Encourage historic research and public education concerning histo and Delray's historic neighborhoods. • Stabilize neighborhoods and improve property values. • Welcome contemporary infill. • Offer an opportunity for public participation during HPB reviews. http://www.mydelraybeach.com/Delray/Departments/Planning+and+Zoning/Historic+Pre... 10/28/2004 Program Do's and Don'ts I The City of Delray Beach Page 1 of 2 cf. �'�' i u ec r t .aim t Get with the Plan . . ♦ )' p . L seEs s s c s$ E• �swm 6'zs.w- b....n`ve ke iP Department Home I Contact Us I FAQ's I Mission For Visitors 1, For Residentsjj For Businesses 3 AN::11,16° E. ZO 11;.N.S. City Home> Departments> Planning and Zoning> Historic Preservation>Program Do's !Choose a Department Program Dons and Donuts The Historic Preservation Program Does Application Forms Boards&Agendas • Encourage adaptive re-use of historic buildings. • Census 2000 • Provide forms of relief such as the granting of waivers and varian • Downtown Plan properties. Notice of Intent 04-02 • Offer financial incentives through the City's tax abatement program. • Osceola Park • Require administrative or Historic Preservation Board (HPB) rev More alterations. • Offer restoration and rehabilitation information to property owners t preservation design guidelines. • Require HPB review of all demolitions, relocations, and new constri. • Enhance community recognition and pride. • Maintain the character and scale/development pattern of your neigl • Improve the local economy by promoting tourism and garnering City's architectural and cultural heritage. • Offer staff and on-line assistance relating to historic preservation is: • Encourage historic research and public education concerning histo and Delray's historic neighborhoods. • Stabilize neighborhoods and improve property values. 4. Welcome contemporary infill. • Offer an opportunity for public participation during HPB reviews. The Historic Preservation Board Does NOT • Usurp individual property rights. • Affect interior changes including alteration of floor plans or interior c • Restrict additions or improvements to historic properties. • Mandate specific exterior paint colors. • Require that a building be open to the public or that the property ov in organized tours. • Require review for routine maintenance. • Override zoning district regulations. • Require restoration of a building (repairs using exact period buildinc http://www.mydelraybeach.com/Delray/Departments/Planning+and+Zoning/Historic+Pres... 1/12/2005 Program Do's and Don'ts I The City of Delray Beach Page 2 of 2 • Demand the purchase of a historical plaque. • Interfere with life/safety issues. • Require re-construction of a building if demolished by natural disast • Deny the use of storm protection on a historic building. ©Copyright 2001 City of Delray Beach.All rights reserved. Privacy Policy. Disclaimer. The All-America City 2001 This site has had 13,493 visitors since November 4,2002. http://www.mydelraybeach.com/Delray/Departments/Planning+and+Zoning/Historic+Pres... 1/12/2005 A DEFRAY BEACH DEFRAY BEACH HISTORIC. PRESERVATION BOARD IUI.. MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT 1993 1993 Project Name: The Sewell C. Biggs House(212 Seabreeze Avenue) Historic Designation Report for an Individual Property Virginia & Erskine Courtenay, Owners Report prepared by Dorothy W. Patterson ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD K': The action requested of the Board is that of making a recommendation to the City Commission on a request for individual historic designation for The Sewell C. Biggs House (212 Seabreeze Avenue), pursuant to Land Development Regulations (LDR) Section 4.5.1(C). BACKGROUND IANALYSIS The current property owners have proposed to designate the subject property to the Local Register of Historic Places. As stated in the attached designation report, Sewell C. Biggs, a northern Delaware native, graduated from the University of Delaware in 1938. He also attended the University of Virginia Law School, and studied architecture at Harvard, Oxford, and Cambridge Universities. He became a serious collector of 18th and 19t-century American art and, in 1988, the Biggs Museum of American Art opened in Dover, Delaware to house his collection. The 14 galleries of the museum contain a collection which covers more than 200 years of American art and decorative art gems. That same year, Biggs established the Sewell C. Biggs Chair in American Art History at the University of Delaware. The architect of the Sewell C. Biggs House, Paul Rudolph, was an important influence on American Modernism in the mid-twentieth century. According to C. Ford Peatross, curator of Architecture, Design, and Engineering at the Library of Congress, "Paul Rudolph was a profound influence on the second half of the 20th century and a model of rare integrity who is being rediscovered by a new generation". Christopher Domin and Joseph King, authors of'Paul Rudolph, The Florida Houses', state that "The Florida houses are an accessible entry into a formidable career. His work is a compelling example of regionally inspired modernism'. The design of the house portrays a significant example of the modernism which swept through the state in the years after World War II and embodies the characteristics of mid-century modernism, the innovative uses of new materials, and adaptation to suit the South Florida environment. Paul Rudolph's design was constructed by the Sinks, father and son, who had a long record of building in Delray Beach. The elder Sinks built many of the structures on or near Atlantic Avenue such as the Masonic Building, the 1926 High School, the Wuepper Building, the Casa del Ray Hotel, and the Arcade Building. The Sewell C. Biggs House is associated with an original owner who was important in preserving, conserving, and promoting American fine and decorative arts. The style of the home is a design unique to Delray Beach and is the artistic work of an architect who was a leader in the 20th-century American design field. It is also the only Paul Rudolph designed building in Meeting Date:June 15,2005 Agenda Item: III.A. Historic Preservation Board Memorandum Staff Report The Sewell C.Biggs House(212 Seabreeze Avenue)Designation Report Page 2 Delray Beach (although Rudolph designed many Florida homes and buildings) and is representative of 20th-century regional modernism tailored for the Florida environment. Further, the house is an example of the skill of the Sinks construction firm which built some of the best surviving historic buildings in Delray Beach. Designating this site as historic will help preserve the character of the extant historic dwelling and will promote the preservation of other surrounding historic properties. At its meeting of May 4, 2005, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) conducted a formal review of the designation report and set a public hearing date for the designation of the subject property for May 18, 2005. However, the applicant did not submit the required names and addresses of property owners within a 500' radius of the property to meet that deadline. These have now been submitted and the proposal is now before the Board for recommendation. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(B) (1), to qualify as a historic site the property must fulfill one or more of the criteria set forth in LDR Section 4.5.1(B) (2) and/or (3). The designation report contains, at minimum, sufficient information to meet the criteria stated in both LDR Sections 4.5.1(B) (2) and (3). The criteria are as follows: LDR Section 4.5.1(B) (2): (a) Is associated in a significant way with the life or activities of a major person important in city, state, or national history (for example, the homestead of a local founding family); (b) Is the site of a historic event with significant effect upon the city, state, or nation; (c) Is associated in a significant way with a major historic event, whether cultural, economic, social, military, or political; (d) Exemplifies the historical, political, cultural, economic, or social trends of the community in history; or (e) Is associated in a significant way with a past or continuing institution which has contributed substantially to the life of the city. LDR Section 4.5.1(B) (3): (a) Portrays the environment in an era of history characterized by one or more distinctive architectural styles; and, (b) Embodies, those distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, period, or.. method of construction; (c) Is a historic or outstanding work of a prominent architect, designer, landscape architect, or builder, or (d) Contains elements of design, detail, material, or craftsmanship of outstanding, quality or which represented, in its time, a significant innovation or adaptation to the South Florida environment. • Historic Preservation Board Memorandum Staff Report The Sewell C. Biggs House(212 Seabreeze Avenue)Designation Report Page 3 The designation report demonstrates that the subject property qualifies as a historic site as it: is associated in a significant way with the life or activities of a major person important in city, state, or national history[LDR Section 4.5.1(8)(2)(a)]; embodies those distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, period, or method of construction [LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(3)(b)]; is a historic or outstanding work of a prominent architect, designer, landscape architect, or builder [LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(3)(c)]; and contains elements of design, detail, material, or craftsmanship of outstanding quality or which represented, in its time, a significant innovation or adaptation to the South Florida environment[LDR Section 4.5.1(8)(3)(d)]. Comprehensive Plan: A review of the Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan was conducted and the following is noted: Housing Element Objective A-10: The City shall support the conservation and rehabilitation of historically significant housing, especially where such housing is an identifying characteristic of a particular neighborhood. As briefly discussed above and as further stated in the attached designation report, the Sewell C. Biggs House is associated with an original owner who was important in preserving, conserving, and promoting American fine and decorative arts. The style of the home is a design unique to Delray Beach and is the artistic work of an architect who was a leader in the 20t'- century American design field. It is also the only Paul Rudolph designed building in Delray Beach (although Rudolph designed many Florida homes and buildings) and is representative of 20th-century regional modernism tailored for the Florida environment. Further, the house is an example of the skill of the Sinks construction firm which built some of the best surviving historic buildings in Delray Beach. Designating this site as historic will help preserve the character of the extant historic dwelling and will promote the preservation of other surrounding historic properties. COURTESY/ PUBLIC NOTICES N< Special courtesy notices were provided to the property owners within a 500' radius of the subject property proposed to be individually designated. Letters of support or objection, if any, will be presented at the HPB meeting. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move a recommendation of approval to the City Commission that the residence and associated property at 212 Seabreeze Avenue (The Sewell C. Biggs House) be listed in the Local Register of Historic Places, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and Sections 4.5.1(B) and 4.5.1(C) of the Land Development Regulations. C. Deny the listing of the residence and associated property at 212 Seabreeze Avenue (The Sewell C. Biggs House) in the Local Register of Historic Places, by finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and Sections 4.5.1(B) and 4.5.1(C) of the Land Development Regulations. Historic Preservation Board Memorandum Staff Report The Sewell C. Biggs House(212 Seabreeze Avenue)Designation Report Page 4 RECOMMENDATION Move a recommendation of approval to the City Commission that the residence and associated property at 212 Seabreeze Avenue (The Sewell C. Biggs House) be listed in the Local Register of Historic Places, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and Sections 4.5.1(B) and 4.5.1(C) of the Land Development Regulations. Attachment:Location Map, The Sewell C.Biggs House(212 Seabreeze Avenue)Designation Report,Photographs Memorandum Staff Report Prepared by:Warren Adams,Historic Preservation Planner Iuu1—L-Liii 1 N w N.E. 5TH ST. z Z ISL;ND DRIVE ¢ c ‘ J / A /- Li N J.i Q w • r1 Z � � Z N.E. 4 CH ST. BEACH DRIVE W ¢ LLI I- SEA SPRAY AVE. W f Q SANDOWAY LANE WATERWAY LANE a zi_ J Fr - zz a, D I- I- VI S .J U) —1 \ - LAING - _ ST. N.E. 3RD Si. . I i MAR RI . p VISTA DEL MAR DRIVE 1 i S U F. j Z w ¢ w i - DORCHESTER Z CO—OP THOMAS STREET N.E. 2ND ST. Z EAST WIND BEACH CLUB N. -J J� Q v BERKSHIRE I— J w I DRIVE 0 N.E. 1ST CT. z BY THE SEA 7 > ¢ Q Q L La GROSVENOR x O a z Q a HOUSE LOWRY STREET MANOR HOUSE N.E. 1ST ST. CONDO Z FIRE VETERANS DELRAY \ - STA. SUMMIT cn GROVE NO. 2 ATLANTIC PARK CONDO W w CONDO 1,4 _ PLAZA z I //� w Q 0 a I ct BARR w Li TERRACE CONDO SPANISH DELRAY BEACH >� RIVER MARRIOTT 0 RESORT ATLANTIC AVENUE N -00.-- THE SEWELL C. BIGGS HOUSE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FL 212 SEABREEZE AVENUE PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM833 Designation Report Historic Preservation Board Delray Beach, Florida The SeweliC . Biggs House • Table of Contents I. GENERAL INFORMATION II. LOCATION MAP III. NOT APPLICABLE IV. HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE V. ARCHITECTURAL SIGNIFICANCE VI. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE VII. BIBLIOGRAPHY AND SOURCES VIII. ATTACHMENTS Report Prepared By: Dorothy W. Patterson 1206 NE Second Avenue Delray Beach, FL 33444 (561) 278-2191 (home) 274-9578 (Archives) 717-3425 (cell) E-mail summerpatt@earthlink.net Date of Report: April 20, 2005 Name of Owners: Erskine H. and Virginia W. Courtenay 212 Seabreeze Avenue Delray Beach, Florida 33483 2 I. General Information Address The Sewell C. Biggs House, named for its original owner, is located at 212 Seabreeze Avenue within the city limits of Defray Beach, Florida. Legal Description Lot 21 and the west 35 feet of Lot 22, Delray Beach Esplanade, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, page 39, Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida. Location Lots 21 and 22 are at the end of Seabreeze Avenue. A driveway at this point leads to the front entrance of the Courtenay home. The tots are bounded by Lot 26 of Ocean Breeze Estates on the south and Vista Del Mar Drive South on the north. At the time of construction in 1955 the front entrance faced Vista Del.Mar Drive South. This area is on the barrier island between the Intra-coastal Waterway and the Atlantic Ocean. Zoning Single Family Residential Classification for Designation We believe that the Sewell C. Biggs House, designed by esteemed mid- century modern architect, Paul Rudolph, meets the criteria for both architectural and cultural significance for the reasons described in the following pages of the report. 3 II. Location Map To be provided by City of Delray Beach. III District Inventory Not applicable 4 • IV. Historical and Cultural Significance Before 1895 the lots where the Sewell C. Biggs House is located were part of a semitropical wilderness between the coastal ridge and a swampy morass. Less than two blocks away from the lots the coastal ridge begins. The first construction known in the area was the Orange Grove House of Refuge built by the U.S. Life Saving Service (precursor to the Coast Guard) in 1876. The former site of the House of Refuge is a short walk from the Briggs House. The Refuge keeper's son, Charles Pierce, described the land around the Refuge House as follows: The house... was built on a broad flat that ran back from the open sand beach to the higher ridge behind the house...At the Orange Grove it was covered with a thick growth of saw palmetto. The flat was covered with sea oats and scattered bunches of stunted seagrape and cocoplum. This flat extended north two and one-half miles and ended at the caves; to the south it stretched for nearly four miles ... To the west, commencing at the foot of the palmetto-covered ridge, was a deep swamp of tall sawgrass with numerous small channels turning about its eastern side. The morass was about half a mile wide and extended from Lake Worth to Boca Raton; west of it were pinewoods reaching back as far as one could see." The Pierce family encountered deer, bear and heard panthers screaming in the night. They killed the bears for food. After settlement by Americans of European descent began, the area was used for farming such crops as strawberries, pineapples, mangoes and tomatoes. Beginning with the mid-1920's Florida Real Estate Boom, the land became more valuable for residential housing. Or as Adolf Hofman said in one of his letters home to Germany, "Since Delray is growing and the lots fetch colossal prices, I will divide my land between canal and railroad into lots." One of first the farmers in the area, Adolf Hofman developed the Ocean Breeze Estates subdivision adjoining Delray Beach Esplanade, in 1937. • Local attorney Ernest Simon recalls that in the late 1930's and early 1940's when he was delivering the Delray Beach News on his bicycle, there were only a few houses in the area._ Delray Beach Esplanade, the subdivision where the Briggs House is located, was platted in 1938 by H. H. and 'Charlotte Wellenbrink and Williard and Billie Waters. The Waters were 5 well-known in Delray Beach. Wiiiard Waters was a building contractor who had graduated from Delray High School. His family lived at 222 N. Ocean and farmed land on the barrier island in the early years of the 20th century. Waters was also active in city politics and civic clubs. After World War II, building in the neighborhood began in earnest. Tom Woolbright, who went into the building business for himself in 1949,recalls spending the 1947 hurricane in a house in the neighborhood. He said the area was pretty well built up by then and that Willard Waters built many of the houses. Mr. Woolbright remembers that H.H. Wellenbrink was "the money man" who paid for improvements such as building roads, filling land, and paying engineering fees for the plat. Roy Simon, native of Delray Beach, was an apprentice architect in the 1950s for local architect, Ken Jacobson. He recalls that Vista del Mar (Delray Beach Esplanade) was fairly built up by then. After he saw the Paul Rudolph designed house under construction, he and other architects were enthusiastic about the chance of designing contemporary housing. However, he said, "I seemed to keep drawing nice cottages." There were many important clients for houses in the neighborhood such as CEO's of nationally known corporations, famous professional golfers and prominent Delray Beach citizens. The clients loved the smallness and "laid-back" atmosphere of Delray Beach. But evidently they did not have the artistic sensibilities of Sewell C. Biggs and did not request avant garde contemporary designs. • James Sinks, a local building contractor, constructed architect Paul Rudolph's design. According to Ernie Simon, Sinks had a reputation for being a "good builder." Jim Sinks father, Irwin J. Sinks, was also a builder originally from Champaign, Illinois. During World War I he went to work for the U.S. Government and was sent to Charleston, S.C. to build soldiers' barracks. In Charleston he roomed with Fred J. Schrader from Delray Beach. Schrader was the first builder in Delray with architectural training. He came to town in 4911 and built the town's first jail, the Cromer Block on Atlantic Avenue a and the original part of the Presbyterian Church on Gleason Street. Schrader encouraged Sinks to come to Delray. In 1922 after another assignment in Miami, the Sinks family moved to Delray. The Sinks, father and son, quintessential Delray builders of their time, had a long record of building in Delray Beach. The elder Sinks built many of the structures on or near Atlantic Avenue such as the Masonic Building, the 1926 6 High School, the Wuepper Building, the Casa del Ray Hotel, and the Arcade Building. Jim built the Atha Building which replaced the Cromer Building. Laura Sinks Britt said in her book, My Gold Coast, "My father had become a builder of more structures on Atlantic Avenue than any other one contractor and Jim added his score." Today some of the "nice cottages," which fit gently into subdivision-sized lots on the short winding streets of the neighborhood, are being torn down to make way for large estate style homes. At present we do not know the exact circumstances of how Sewell C. Biggs came to build a house in Delray Beach and chose Paul Rudolph as his architect. He has been described as "enigmatic" and not easy to know. A biography of his life is in the process at this time. The curator at the Sewell C. Biggs Museum in Dover, Delaware, said Biggs owned the house about six years. The Delray Beach City Directory lists him as the owner at the address for about nine years. Randy Grover, the curator, was asked to present a retrospective of Biggs life to the museum board when Mr. Biggs died suddenly in 2003 at age 88. Grover said he felt that the story of the house in Delray Beach was a high point of his presentation. The reason for this was that Biggs was known for his collection of 18th and 19th century American art. The house signaled the beginning of a turn toward the 20th century. In fact Sewell Bigg's vision was for his collection to cover the entire range of American art. Sewell C. Biggs, a northern Delaware native, graduated from the University of Delaware in 1938. He also attended the University of Virginia Law School and studied architecture at Harvard, Oxford, and Cambridge Universities. In 1937 he took a trip around the world that had an enduring impact on the rest of his life. After the trip he was interested in international exchange and began to sponsor foreign students for one-year scholarships at the University of Delaware. A serious collector of art, he was also involved in historical preservation and art conservation. Biggs collection of American fine and decorative art has been described as "elegant, wonderful, pristine, remarkable, impressive, and an incredible journey ranging from Colonial portraiture to the Hudson River School." With his vision and eye for quality, Biggs spent most of his life on his American art collection. In 1998 the Biggs Museum of American Art opened in Dover to house his collection which includes Delaware and 7 Delaware Valley fine and decorative arts. The 14 galleries of the museum contain a collection which covers more than 200 years of American fine art and decorative art gems. That same year Biggs established the Sewell C. Biggs Chair in American Art History at the University of Delaware. The title of an exhibit at the Biggs Museum of American Art says it best --"Artful Living: The Legacy of Sewell C. Biggs." Mr. Biggs sold his house at 212 Seabreeze about 1970 to a New York lawyer and his wife, Richard and Alice McAvoy. Evidently the McAvoy's did not have much time in the house because a Webb Brothers Real Estate information sheet is headed Estate of Richard McAvoy. (See attachments) Reference No. 2 on the sheet cites a merit award, medium house class (600-2800 sq. ft.), given in June 1959 by House & Home, an architecture magazine. The fourth and present owners of the house, Virginia and Erskine Courtenay, bought the house in 1973. Well-known Delray Beach Realtor, Pat Patterson, showed the house. Before becoming a real estate salesman for Ben Adam's Realty, Patterson was known for his pharmacy, his photography, and his volunteer work as a ham radio operator during World War II. Virginia Courtenay says that she "fell in love with the light, being up in the trees, and the architecture. She already greatly admired the work of Paul Rudolph. Mrs. Courtenay's grandfather was a builder in Chicago. She attended the Art Institute of Chicago and has owned an interior design business in Delray Beach for more than 25 years. Erskine Courtenay agreed to the purchase because Virginia loved the house, and he loved her. Paul Rudolph has been sometimes criticized for elevating style at the expense of function and some changes had to be made for practical living. Mr. And Mrs. Courtenay have always wanted and have strived to keep the house as close to the original design as possible. Sensitivity to the original design while making changes has always been an important aspect of planning. In addition Rudolph's Florida houses had been designed just prior . _ . to the time when air-conditioning became a standard feature of south Florida homes. Some of the innovative design features meant to ameliorate the Florida climate worked against the efficiency of air-conditioning. For example, in the back of the house paneling was installed over the aluminum louver windows because the strength of the wind blowing against the louvers ;had been a problem at times, and after air-conditioning was installed, the problems continued. The windows in the front of the original part of the 8 house look the same even though they have been replaced. Paul Rudolph drew a plan for an addition and approved the changes to the house in 1980. (See attachments). However, Rudolph was not aware of the need to raise the house 4 feet because of a new law which dictated that the house must be 7.5 feet above mean sea level. (Flooding of the lot during the rainy season had occurred at times after original construction in 1955.) Local architect Bob Currie was then hired to plan lifting the house and the addition in 1980-81.. The interior of the addition matches the interior of the original house. The original hedges, trees and landscaping remain the same. (See attachments) 9 V. Architectural Significance The architect of the Sewell C. Bigg House in Delray Beach, Paul Rudolph (1918-1997), was an important influence on American modernism in the mid-twentieth century. He was a Kentucky native and son of a Methodist minister. According to C. Ford Peatross, curator of Architecture, Design and Engineering at the Library of Congress, Rudolph drew on many influences for his Florida work. He was open to new and experimental methods of construction-- stretching structural possibilities of materials to their limit's while celebrating their static and aesthetic possibilities, spatial richness, complexity and inter-relationship of the interiors and exteriors... of his buildings, their site, their natural surroundings and their climate. His appreciation of these qualities in both modern architecture and in the vernacular buildings of his native South had been fostered by E. Walter Burkhardt under whom he studied architecture at Auburn University (then Alabama Polytechnic Institute). Burkhart recommended his student to Walter Gropius who was instrumental in Rudolph's admission to Harvard Graduate School of Design. Burkhart was one of the most energetic and enlightened directors of the Historic American Building Survey, now one of the most frequently consulted collections in the Library of Congress. Mr. Peatross wrote the preface to Paul Rudolph, The Florida Houses He is well-acquainted with Rudolph's work because the architect bequeathed his professional papers and drawings to the Library and funded the Center of Architecture, Design and Engineering there. Peatross' accolades include-the statement: "Paul Rudolph was a profound influence of the second half of the 20th century and a model of rare integrity who is being rediscovered by a new generation." His assessment of Rudolph's Florida buildings is that the "innovative, adventurous and elegant Florida buildings launched Rudolph's career." Petross further finds in working with drawings of many famous architects in the Library of Congress Collections that "with the exception of Wright; however, I have found none of their graphic works to be as consistently daring, stimulating, accomplished, and often beautiful as those of Paul Rudolph's drawings. His drawings convey his restless intellectual `curiosity, his prodigious spatial imagination and, in Phillip Johnson's words, the 'speed of his mind'...Collectively, they represent a treasure chest of 10 Wright; however, I have found none of their graphic works to be as consistently daring, stimulating, accomplished,and often beautiful as those of Paul Rudolph's drawings. His drawings convey his restless intellectual curiosity, his prodigious spatial imagination and, in Phillip Johnson's words, the 'speed of his mind'...Collectively, they represent a treasure chest of lessons, ideas, and possibilities that will speak to and inspire generations to come." Christopher Domin and Joseph King, authors of Paul Rudolph, The Florida Houses, visited the present owners in Delray Beach. The Courtenays are listed in the Acknowledgments on page 13. The Sewell C. Biggs House is featured in the "Independent Practice" section on page 183 where the house -- is compared to the "award-winning Cohen House...(1953-1955)" on Siesta Key. The authors' opening statement is: "While coming of age as architects along the west coast of Florida in a landscape increasingly homogenized by air-conditioning and prolific land development, Paul Rudolph's architecture stood alone in our eyes as a rigorous counter-argument." Domin and King met in the graduate program at the Georgia Institute of Technology. After discovering their shared interest in Rudolph's work, they made their avocation the searching out of buildings designed by Rudolph across the state of Florida. The authors' conclude that "Rudolph's early work in Florida over a 20-year period was a necessary testing round for a multi-layered design methodology of a complex career. The fact that the architect's work was widely publicized at the time played a significant role in national recognition of Rudolph's work. The Florida houses are an accessible entry into a formidable career. His work is a compelling example of regionally inspired modernism. The beautiful photographs are seen today in a bittersweet light as we are now all too aware of what happens when a vastly enlarged population of affluent Americans descends on all too few miles of pristine beaches." The Delray Beach Historical Society featured the Sewell C. Biggs House as one of the components in its "The Art of Architecture in South Florida" exhibit in 1989. One of the displays described how orientation, sun, heat and ventilation were addressed by the design. (See attachments) 11 VI. Statement of Significance The owners, Esrkine H. & Virginia W. Courtenay, wish to nominate their property for the following reason: "After living in it since 1973, are very much like those of the original owner, Mr. Sewell C. Biggs. It has maintained its sense of elegance in its simplicity and its feeling of"dateless" architecture which stands the test of time. In 1981 we raised the original house four feet to add a lower floor which now houses a library, guest bedroom and laundry room. This was accomplished with the collaboration of local architect, Robert Currie, who was interested in the house for its historical importance." The style of the home is a design, unique to the neighborhood and to Delray Beach, of the artistic work of an architect who was a leader in 20th century American design field. It is the only Paul Rudolph designed building in Delray Beach although Rudolph designed many Florida homes and buildings. It is representative of 20th century regional modernism tailored for the Florida environment. Further the house is an example of the skill of the Sinks construction firm which built some of the best surviving buildings in Delray Beach. Other reasons for designation are that respect shown for the characteristics of our property will draw attention to the need for preservation in Delray Beach's older neighborhoods; the hope that local designation will afford some protection for the house in the future,and to set an example in a neighborhood being pressured by demolitions. In summary the Sewell C. Biggs House is associated with an original owner who was important in preserving, conserving and promoting American fine and decorative arts. His collection spans the more than 200 years that the United States has existed as a country. The property has been followed under Historical and Cultural Significance in this Designation Report throughout the entire history of Delray Beach after 1876. Further it reflects social and economic trends in the community and is indicative of the winter -- colony of artistic and socially prominent people which has existed in Delray Beach since the 1920's. Since the house at 212 Seabreeze fits comfortably into the history of Delray Beach, and the original owner proved to have the "vision and eye for quality" of a major American art collector, there seems no doubt that the house at 212 Seabreeze has historical and cultural significance. 12 The design of the house portrays a significant example of the modernism which swept through the state in the years after World War II and embodies the characteristics of mid-century modernism and innovative uses of new materials. It is an example of the work of a leading American architect whose testing round was Florida. The design is both a significant innovation and adaptation to the South Florida environment. 13 VII. Bibliography & Sources Britt, Laura Sinks, My Gold Coast. Palatka, Florida: Brittany House Publishers, 1984. Delray Beach Historical Society Archives. Delray Beach City Directories, 1953-54, 1955, 1957,1961,1963,1966, 1973, 1976,1979, Miller, Polk, Price & Lee. Domin, Christopher & King, Joseph. Paul Rudolph, The Florida Houses. New York, New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2002. Hofman, Charles, Letters from Linton. Hollywood, Florida: Legacy Press, 2004. Palm Beach County Records, Palm Beach County Courthouse, West Palm Beach, Florida. Pierce, Charles W., Pioneer Life in Southeast Florida. Ed. Donald Walter Curl. Coral Gables: University of Miami Press, 1970. Interviews: April, 2005 Erskine H. and Virginia W. Courtenay, property owners. Randolph Grover, Curator, Biggs Museum of American Art Roy Simon, Architect, Delray Beach native Ernest Simon, Attorney, Delray Beach native Tom Woolbright, retired builder, Delray Beach native 14 • • • i 1 • ,.. ; F i t3 f 1 '> ` ' - • -s , ..i 4 } 1 a. v' F'.., �"} ,'" �r41 }} t- '1 h- r l • . ; ,.,:,: ',./., ii -i'' ...ti rill t� t ; a }E .i t i - .� *ems8. yt- '-_? ° 1:t4�{' 'i 4 5-i Y.�xs,r-s�` x s `4 \ Jf - ' sue' Ssxs-Ck z - :. -r-- * 4 x-tom 'c' 4F ------ 4. ....s nt'r - V.- fir °x \ :€..'.'y � '1 1' - :''cam • If • t .. „� �� t'= es,,; - _ - M "� .a-,,,1- -��, try ,'2,4. ' f .": '� �$$ --�' 4 4 -s ue- .-,e-�7.- •'- is f ',',..• A , t v al `� *£Yi1X -8L_ -"" . . jc` o fi.a ', < S -�.?{j y s7p% -s`�z#� c1` '� R,� -'� -4 WA'���F��� sir-.� -t �"s ''-i _r 3 c -` -bs i y 4#-.u� --.- iti-F f � ft...1,v1J iz1 s .h 's Y } ,.-" _--, M •,.sir4 8 -7,- '#'' - - ,- ----,'.rs,:... -�- -.- - fit ` . y t .!ilk !*t"x f 'i?'`. spa--, a ,4_a,.._43,-i,..---.,.4_-_.i,.-_"._z:"_.7-"_i_'_•-_li._r•..i.,.,._,,',e_._-...,4_.!._.-_:,_,,_.--•.,Z-;_-v_.;r_--•'._-.:-,,7 1%__:".t_;_-_-:-._.[W,_z_._.5-•_14._-i•17.-",_-a--.._:-_,-.t_-1,Ib'"-.:-..,1. . ,. t'" I r .-z tY,,. ,_',v t ors' 4 - ' ,, ,.4., h r.' - x ti'' ` #sf '-,r- 3' F r .3� -. t- ' ram--- � i a "-n a .r- Y .' _ � -,f- - '`YJ i 'x.;_ r��.. -77 -a t t ;rn• - h } -� x , Y" `i "'T-" '-"- -c .r-4i- z ,r-'g` sr w_-,, _ Y7JS1.` ✓,!'"�. .�-^f�n.,.. J+i;�p e- �'.' "'£ ec -� t j r T- .Fix l i'i ( - L t . -s s 5l = ?_ } s z�^- {s ti s' -*- %"fir- . t,: If - .. t +?-r - f 2 l C Y,iti 3 - {S j_ "�_ ' ';:' L- - '' y �:. .-'k." 4-at 4 7 ns/� kk .� r .- - >.. Jrs.- a ,,s, v ..-- ,.. . r �. .t '?e' -. �...:.. ..�-...��;mt•.Y:`.-�.+',._.ems_ ��=..x �"*.,,a�':�;`- :-t-•.3fifi W_ a • • • • A - chr r jr-1 -I--- I D>-Ato;,A b pout Rudolph cnp 1 r or-,r • "Pax& 1 Rudolph;The, Mort ock H 5 S • cry r ir , t 1 4 a 1 Sv • • K. 2��kg —M== r'�tt _ �_ T a ' mot. 4 ,, < i.. il k, .. -,, N7,1,,,-;`,.13,,,,,,r5.. :,...:2.7.:.:.......,., :.--....:..''''''.44,..7 ".-.--,..±71---,.._.AA_a...W.;_,.., i.. ..,,.......P tt-_-_-.....----=_-_,-_-=,...—_-,.---_,._-_,- _..N'.',=.:Vit.•-i --.Ztfi =--_•_-__-..-..... ...kr': ' .0•:- • -may ---� '1'a '.:c-z`t l -to, 't �_ • �i' • • +,.— .." ° -4'ito" _I,. __ .•s -x-- ,?ram _ .' 1'�'b,:--- _ .. -. "`° -.,r ti ` c. - f Y i1 • s.P «-r` f� --3',. ..r . Sf - - r •y .4.4 4St 'Ft tta ax • �,7 _ ..1 'if ; -`.g -;cam:..- ,- -- .-.......��'..: -... :: -s. .�._.L=�.�" • • i-N• cC h1 eN-\- 7— phoi-v ra,VY 1g56-5(v copy oF- Ear°• '- of\er-- Dhoi-o crop\-, ci-dm {{mob v�\ Zv c�\0- 1 Clne �lorlio14 uou3eS`' • 4 6 .--...., •' • . . . . ,.. `,.. • • , . . .. i . . . . . . . . . . .. .... . . .. .. . . ; I - . • - I I . Nt,5,.." ...:''...../-",::'fi-....:-0--i-'."...";1-.'"E''.:•0- 1;.C".-::-.' -.:-:.:'-;":::""-- ..--- - -. * :i I ‘‘.. ‘.- '"-- "'""::' .- :-":'..l'..,""::',:-4.-',::.",:;.f.•_g:-.:'.-;!":•-"'-..f:'-"R: ..-'.- -- -. ... - 3 'kf,."'' ' "---:--:'.---!-::-;::-.."'"-",::',:::-•Vt---"-k."'4".C.-:7:::,-..4 --;.:i';'''-,-::-'-"::':'--: - . " : ' . I • %O.'3. -Um\ N:*;'''."-'":-';';-'---":.--':•.-Z-;Z"'-f:':;"-.V::''i.:`-,,k,'"'-',,:'•:-.'";"-.::--::""-''''..."-- . . '"...- '.- ..-- -' ! .::::. ".:":.:'.-:;'::".''',''•••:::,-it.:::-...'k:,-?.. .i.:14:',;-Z-,-.it'',: f.:f'-;;:,':--: '-'-'-: -'' --....": " I r,.. NV,,'..i.-::...5_:•"_...1.;.::Ag.t.-;;A;;;;."4,•Y-%'":'1;':4-7:''S,:;• :.:"-:::;.,:-.-',: :: ...- .-- : . -. .; "t,'I'''':::::!'..6 .'",•C!';.1.,._Ig--;•,14;:,";:3:::&;?'?:.- -..:-,..--../..'''::';.--;-.::::'-,'..- '.. - . . . .,,.. . , : - • . 7f4';,-;1-,'.;.4A"'::.?1;'*:??,-:;44)-.".:€"rf,_";,:6-'24-':j'•-:--."',".---. I .. -.. .... . . 5,,ttf-...,T&Et---'Ml2". ":,5,-;;:":";.-,: ""-i-:4:-'::" .-15 ;.i.V -4.1.V_Sti-_:"":41,..f0i-gr.,,g*,-.. :2,--:-..:.•...'-.%:::,'-...-: ' . ':'..4k-11...:iii:t;:-.:-:',-,. -.7:-';'-'0,74M.':Ft-•:.,:::---,:.14.1-4;IA-flf'4:--'::,:•;0:-i,t-'''-".:j.-2•0'-'1---0.'-'..--..-"-1.: : : '.':-i=".e.i,-.iii-:::IN';- 1,;::•'--:,':-..4-- ,-EP-.V.,''';47.-1"J:--;,.'--- --!':- "'': ; -`,.. i''---'11.",,.::--Ai : • "3-..:,-‘1:ri:::4=',----,..-T--.4-'i-04 °U....!ri.:!!3!-'0,-:2;_1•0.1 s-i.:-.,...i L •., ---f-z.-"..'-',&5;,:..".f.,-1,1'... .. . &-.1-.jclkif.-:!.:i..::?.:;4'..-:", ' • -':.... ,_,:'.'. -... .*,,.". • - "--"---,--,,N-v-W2-74.<4. :7r,,,.-.;,.,-.•.- ' i."-"' ''' ''' • - ..--:-----fai -=.R'4,-;-,,,.- --f-'U111PA-----,..-- . - ---:.-.1-.:-,,*-• • .-- .-:-:,:i...,;-,,--4....-.1 -rz.---.,-:: •,„.„,-.:. . - 1.'.-:-:-.-.:---5,i-.-----,..,,,..,--- . . --i,-.--A,,,,,„•-. ..,,:.,_,... „...,. . -- ---- -..,----, -,-,,s:,---,---------- .-,-. --zi'-.! - ..- --,-.-.,-,:an.-_7 -v ,---i-' -:•:,: - . 1 ...._. • .1--- - 1::•- . ,_ -... ..- .., 0-..........., ..,.. .,- ...„-.•...'"-.::-' ' '""----'"---,,,,,.;•,-. .14,,f, lif ir-:;:-?0,';','-;:/'•-'1:-.'-4: --':0--1;:‘ . 1 ;.- .': :.•.: :,-4.7:eg:',-;;It'a.4,t.:,-,-;:i'-,-.-:--:,'‘.:-: ,.::-`-:";"t;: ..::'.. :::-,........-:.-,--'-.: :::-";ii1-:-- "Z-•"1:-A.:.-f.st4.:a-11:-1.1:-.: --'..--::-.;:-:' ,. -.S:_,-r'.2,1•-:•-.i!,!-.:-:'-'.",,,.. :-.:-..17-:•4:-... .S.,...7,-.:-. ...I.E0,0-_,Tf.,...,?„,z,F-tr,.,..s..44....-., ------*.•;:;. -;,-.,:f;-4Y.'"..,i,i1. . .-. >,,,,--,--,,,--2,-- ?.:=;.-5,k-i',",-1",-- '7-"!!.. -, ...„ , • •,,,, -,-,,,:';:r.. '• _ ..,,._,. ..,-.1-f-;--X--;.-t ..4.,e51.--j. ..-:. :-...--'- ri-i:-.:,:'.' .;'' .::;....it-f_-%:-..,:,,:%'' '-li--3---",;-'= =1.4-11-1 ,...,‘‘T, I V ,y--:?;•>:==,---,--''''" '-'.4-....• •=4.41,4' '''' -u. '- ' ••••4 A f..-.,::,- -",%.:172::: :',,i.----* ..ti..--1.•4_,''.„:: -._^,:-_,-.:: \. :'::: -f. • ,--1---.,-;ir,-.;------;"--,---- -i-a,,-...-,,t-r1- . .-,.. ..:IL' ' -.9 e41.1--.• ---',-';1.."":1-------",:': --. 'T.--.:';,•.,--:;1:. P.10;."; !tk•j„;:. 4 _ ;;L:It- N .:11-a M i v,trz,..p.,::'-..--..,•;:::...:- ..-,-;-' . ..,A .--r- . ...,. . . ,;.i::i: I.:.-:, ,-S.f; 1:1L-I.i p .I 7.-. . .:- ----.--..-.- , ;---,,..:f,..:..--:ci-._--ri.,,,,---„,,,-; ;,,!--?,14 r.-:-., -,;•-,--- F 2 '; 1.• €-,-er''As .-..Vi,.12-',...fZ;'-',s--7,,-::;- ,-;.04-,il''4 . ..!- .' — r- z" - --. :' • 4,----;--''.i::::",,'-', • ' -...-.(e--- , ---`..; --"" -. , ;.:t...;.. '''.:,::;„'.. -: ,'°•',04'F40--;',„ ' . '4'.:.=ill'5.='1.1--.4--q-„7'-'41 a .m.7.:A--,-.4 l',:-=• ---:-:- . - - • . , ii .„., ,•lx••...;:s=,...q,•1,..,,;4-,, ,i,-......„1„,,-,_..,,,,-4 _. • :. .... ,.. • . . . 0_.•4..., . .„,..___. .• ,„:„.„.........,..„..„.„4„..,..,„...,,:•.: '....4:: i0.- -:.:4'r.k2'''.-":s' ' .-_•.. „,:0*.-,=. ---2.0 -‘..."•-•`-`S..57-c'.,-ci,640.-----:,--::-. .1. .r.i.7 '': '''. -- - '- ' fZ.,1-- j 0 j '','. '" '-'-'r • -;-> Ni-S--' -','-• •'" -1 ,...:1:111, - -- ! ' ,,;J ' 4.'- , .,---' '.-':" '..; -'-'".:::::-:',-.iilr'-'-•.At....?*f..Zzgl,-";'-';'...r."-0:-.:-..'''.:..'-.: .,Vi--;,.. 1'72 '/4 74.'a i a : .,... ft?_.., ---'-',7'-_- _-Z- •-3,-,1"---- -'t::'-;4•- """"'":*--•;-`.;--'''"-.:---. ..:" - . •' "' -'j r '11 I;7--z:':'••=irj.-..*0-6-,,,„j-t.,c41-;:e..;";.-i..:7:3:..;:-.....::,...,, ::-:: .-- , Pe%Ct:--•.----';`-'' !,-. .At;:ii"Y:-A.V34:;:en--.'''';''';:;••!.;..4 ..' i•/. 7, la r,-„,.....____,:.=, .;;-.!,j--1-Sp.-.W.4vt4,,--. 1=-;:..,j‘?•-::1:-7-•-.t':-..:E .:-: .-'•---, . -.. • :,-• . 1 ; ' 47,0 11'- ---'. ----- --,--,e,,i-,-7-,-.4vreo.,„,„,,---.4,-, -,r-rs,-. ...c.:.,--.".1,..-,,,:k.„;::;:•,,...,- ;...r. . - - . pb.. -u.v.-, --- - -.."*.....''',-;''''• -,4'-';ZI.,---',-,-- .,--,-,-n--, •----„''' ' ' ' ' . . irl, .''.....4. -.eks,.„.,,,.. ...-4._ ..,..t..,..„....,... ... . • - • - . . A-Vt- I-,f>,- &f,1 4-- 4-• • 5_2r-_l-tre-c_,„C,1°c ?'‘-hO-. irC3 ra-i b scI€Y; ,p 7, . coptca Cl- Di - o - .. .(4.. • - , • • • . • • • • / • - . • • • ' 0 o - - • ,--..:••••-:--.-',11 Vt-,',... ."..?.•::::::,,... lt, -‘:4;'-:, •• - ' - --il:. -s- f• • -.. - ,,,,A.':•, see 1,1,--4/i ... • - •' .•__ - l'Q•I'Sr.i-, Wt., '-‘-'' '-$1, -.. • ., 4. -•: • ...- ! 4 , ' •• ...."-IS4 . _ V``.'i v.. • tJ .---icl_ . '-.1 - - _,..... - ....., ...:•., _... 1 v"..--' 4',/,?.. •/' .•..1 -''': . ..i -s --'‘ri Ati 't11 '. •'‘ ----.--7.' :----.'''''.' -. , .../ ' T?.it -. -.- • _ _______,,_, .._ _____:_: - ---•-';',44•';-- _._ _-.?_j_,OLL •N i '-' ...4,i,....;. r. ..li .... .t --_______.--_ 4 ----,73—.,,...,„...-.474------L---------------------- --- ' --:---. ____------ • ,5,, _--,-_-_-------... •._ --------=---- -.z----_„-E.----_-*--,,------r--.----___ ' G• -m- i,-..,.......,-... \ ______.------,__--- ______----- --,--.—...-_--__ y. -=---,-_,..— ----- -_----_-- — -,, -- =---.._____ ==--•.---_- _ • .....-.-• ? ..„..., V- .4,.s/e- a t '1.7,41.7.;-,',•- ..,• 4_,_, - ,+..-1, • .- • _ - _ ,,.., ..• :..4• ' i i,_ ' . f t •1.- - :41 -- ,_„. • - 11V-i ..4,46"....-*4.,,-:•-''./:::..4*.: r. •'. • - i AFX11-1..„".-_-.,,-._."•...4-.,•..------ 441 ...,Kr-,-.,•A.,,..-.,_-`,'a,f_i1-.: ••--•---:‘-_;•,-, • __i___iC4'."".-:.t::-:,":c-,1-..4'-t-.-'-,:-i•_;•s.-,-,--;,-r=-z=,-:_-_1---'',--z-_---,1_s-.,1-4-,7.-:.---?':0.-),,._;,-;::.- 11-.,•.,...'.;,0q:-,...•_;..**=1T'*.,-.-t„;...s.,:,.••:7•;:.,.,-.I 1,.;4•:-,4,'-,.'-.-...r-..I-,.. e' • ;-:.1c,..•_`,p.-.!_.--.-b%.--•..-•..--•'".:." _- r ,, t4•.i:.t1 iWi ., , :.:.:5r;e,7-•".v.,„•bZ`.::...•:751.-,4",.„.1---"..,.1-.,.. ."-,;'.•O`.',11,:1:ta.a.-..:.-t',-'-.: &--',-----' ' -‘,..., ----_'__'_-'--- --------. •. .--- ----.717--.-----.:•-•'-'''' F= .-.-•"=-""'",,'-....1.----_,----,--'..--.1.- ...."'' _,7 ...'''.....-'"- .-,,,',---r:-.•=-`-''''--____,-,,-1". :-.,..--..".4..S.!:„.„„la•*.iurri.-"?.;_;,,,,.7j-`,....--,“, -'`'''' .--,- -, --:- --- --=:-_----__ -_._ .,__,-. -"---,..---,z--.----..,----„.---- ---- t ,,,r,_:-.4--- ft'..7t,,,,"2`• . • :-.';'4. - f --.--'-'-! • -,:_,-.., i.o‘,..,..__ -.-..--........, - .-_-_-- - ...,....--..• - .- , - ' .--;---- ... __----_--,-----.„,...•,- .,-,..----. ... _,--- - . ....„ ,,,, ,,,..„."-..„..,_,...a.,.....,--___. - •-. -v.,- : - ----;&-------.,---. .,---- -- -.,K4.",..,-...,,..-- - .....0.. ,.....;... ..z. . . .,..,.- . _ ---i-------;,;----------,---- ...-------,.440..vi,--,?.. .,-;...z..,,5-2..,-„,..1,--4..--. ,_• 11;,- M'It_.4.:•-r-'''-%- ,•-”-::"^'-'-_,..'t.'i'l-a--.p.. `.‘`,..,_. ,.,,i,...4''--••':',...- .'......, -.4-,,_,,,,...._,,,,-.n.:_,,,,,,,,,,,,,-.4---,..,..4,-",r......4--=5,- -.„.,;,--,....ao..•-- ..... -,.-'''"''' -.."- V1,..: -----.-- . - -- - 4 . .` i- --•,, ---------... :: _ -:„..... slt MI • •Se' ,..., A --- — • -; - - - •--,..:--r:.•„.: ' --7-1..13. -4?• - _ t. .7x • .....,.6,4 , ."' ir'.4.1W,,, -:-..'.4,1i.. c.. .. ....7 el. '-,-r- -I.- • . . _ - -----, , ..-.•ttlq. ' - .. , ... . : ....._ ...-‹it •'I;4;1 •;',..f.... . . ' 1....‘. ), { ;14 ". V. ' -.---- ...._____________ . - ' u •' .--:'Z'T.1.'' .., ... - 1 - 1 .__, :4_.- -,= ,:. i' •1-,4.•‘.1"iq' . , 4 . ,....-:--- .2f. -- -. ---- -- -------.------------`'-----,,._ ' ' 0 k i P" ..,c 1- ...._..- --"-•.--....__----------=---- -,---- s, --..., t''• 'kf ."'cifig. .-_,...-.........-.....,__1.----_-,.. - ------,„-......._ , ,_ , r• .1-rp. .------------.-- - ----____-----------____---=----.-------,--------____ -1, , --------,--- -, 1 .,,-...---. _---.----..-.......---- --- -' .,'----.---:-.--- -- ...--?..----:::---..-4. -----,-:--„-- ----. 1" P .,, .,...,_,. -0 1 •-,----_-•----.-- -------_-_---,---_-,, -...,.., --,-, ------,..1.. - - ,. ___-------- • , ,____•..-._....__.-_—---- p s .-__,..-____,_ 1 i_ ,.., ---z---=-_,- ---=-,----'=-•-,-_ 1 c `''''--.•:!!'- ..!`s , .•.-a i . .,t,, ,----------=----- i ,,.-, .-."-L--_----------- , 1 f - ____-------=_.---- , •••,- ----7.-------,-----,--z--_____-_,______--------- ___ 1 z -:----:- ---c--_--.--=-_:- ,------: ...,--.. ..1 -° ) • c _ •. _..7-7_,--;r;-, ,-;-.:;=;:-. —`;,-;---_____--'-:---•'-';•-_--, '=-4----4--: i. - -...,_•_:,g(4 1,„7,4-.. .,.....- ,,,:s•,•.. . ,- , g . tf.•.:-.t:::' , " ' ,•.;: . , ,1 ..:e: . _ Ifs „''',4t1 . , . , .14. • . ; :- . 1,.tt , ..,... • to*.,1,:,•$-: ,'. .-- - .. • •• -•.%.::t-... ' t ' I' f . ' 31••.----7 ,.i'-'.:•-•7-. =-'.1:-,ze•'1-•,•-. •••'-:',..e. '•;..; ,=•-• • -: •;'.; • ,t..,,•-,•-•--1:-:,-•-„,„_-_,-;._--,•1 --i ,,,,,„.• ,i - -,.,.--, , ...- „••• •-... — •.- ,:" • •••? ,..,`," "' • a :..,,f•-••••••. -:-. -•-- -• i.---.7,•,-s'p- 4 -..- •,- ' ". ' ' - ' - • --- , --•:.:''..1F--.• • rgi--..., • - ,-1,___,..z i„.11,....11.4-J,.."2z ;,..r..,...:.„,-,: . ,.i,.. ,.., .,. ;-,,L .••,.. - - .. i I IV- • .• ..r.,. . ,•.--,x • • 7.-F •-.• m.....r. '_2*----•-‘,,,: i.:.; *. -• • , e• " . i: : ' _ . _ • - - .7 -*..;.-_,----...-,-•--,---.----,-- •- ....a. •.------- .••:,..i. .. -• - - . , . . .. '- . .. ... - • , 4,• a 5'; . - ,• -. ..,. --- --- ...::-•-___ . ,7 '---_,:,;.-:-.- -----i...:;'` --1.t&i..7s•W-. - - . • • • - -••:-- _ ..7_,,---'- _----- --..;,-r:----t.,=---;:-,.. , .-_•- •----_•,-.-.-..„-...:—.--._ _ _ . 1 ., r.- • -,---... -------..,_.,4-,---,--- -,-.!_'-.:-- ---- ,i----.:- -••---•.z.... .1..y... --:::- - - delf.,......2-,,,.,...-.=3:•:. ••- . . A-1-1-CA.G. k r-Y- e 1.. 4-bus cxr\cl 1--att)c) 2(;41D11-\6)Apr\ 1 • • _ * ''� .�s -c .-. 'a'- � ..s.�,.., ._ .vim ' ,,` . • r;-wi± Yam .'24,- -r.< sue. �« - -.f' - -`, '• 2 -'"4.� -' •f%z "b 4T-- - F- 'r {�7 -- ,err l -• - - ii - • -0 i ,. S - z- -_ -ram "' ,ci `; v * * ,� g �'�,. -'s �' �.- =s s .� -A .� T p `-f .,� r`5. -4 - - c `?'x'� �'�4r3r';' -`ji K . •f '- >-s.. ,tea.. � y.e- Yam, t 43 £ usr • c`. °- • s ,' s 3.� s-5" .. -s „sT.ry z - T rtC us 3�i• ', `+� R tY�;,. t- f S t.. -- - 3' - �'--1 i t sr x ti-w !iK' ;� £ a. 'fr ` . -• ' . _. ' - v 1 x s s' ' :K�s� . +>r k°` s. �:.. s a^h 'n . r sti 1 � r g '��--- `'•,. x, fi3s*'.. -x.c7-. . 4 F P'=st`= ::�- li, cr.� '+F.r ,, - 5v..,i�� 4 < �r r� ua cam' - -� -'� . . 'SL i �4 .� - x use g r K g � T tt s # 'k a.-- - z-^�...�,. _ 4 A_ ''r:'''K ter R t c' ''- - ,c� - t .>_ -L4'"-' "F 'sF-�- .F' —''-s�-'R, sz..fc#�az•, -e n (`"- t - •. �' �. �'f�..-.mac-§ -<- �,-rt-�•E:_' - ' - 2'--, may . i -a. V' V xi.f." § I t '` ..4--Z u # _ x _s3 kJ Al '1 k S 5 3, _'yam" - ,4 iTsr 'K'i J 0 '' -s ---.-:•-- •* ---• --• •- ' -_ ''‘;-...- •i 7i-'''' '2'1-?*".44=7-4"'-'1W -.;.-t-f-tl--f_'--VZ:'--.,':" -7*'-'-- -Afk.1,-.-i-1:4-S,V2.-:.: c-:.4*:t,-;_•-::?4,;.;:31..-4' tr--4..4...."skizfit,-N ,,. i • (1 12 -' 1L s ris i t �4--� �-s �'' �L^3rgyro �:m s ._ � x �_ � o ; ' - z -L 7-h .z u- ^- yys� .om 3 sFs -.. - .e„ e v# - am „.. . 4, - � , :,',..:-.,,...q-,4.'f,,,-,3:,,,.:fg,,No-,,,,,.i.,:p4,-;.,E,,,:,10,Na.,---s,t.,50.--,,r.---e.,,er-,.. .=-.-s,,,t-, , : trit-,,,tv.re,: ,--;,..:4::0 :.-;111,z,...5,1:7-,-4i.:2,,.. ..:,:t.,.....,,,-...-Ef.-!..zTh--i-5,•1_,;.:1W.i.,&r, ; rp .,_.: .,_3 .a3-'''..�n --.-x-3. --'- (ai£"'_ • 17 '. %= "�'� .?, -., x . a2. 1- '� a,`# I •V^' �r_ • :r;' ^,•' " s C d 4� ;• `' "s ki,"- '^_-".i-�-^_;{PA.,•'= '''E`- $�-' "` - r- -.S- ...,. -.„. tt-i.,•,_.. „.•• ' =;:r ca --- - _ �+. s' *i < r".--vim-r";�.. T _ _ i -•}• - 'sat } V. s...•,, 3" "'c z s sf.-3. -.a � -z- • 5-. •ifs • _c.F --. `z.a3 "• _ �'�- a ,ram.�y.' - '- T - z - _ *rs.z,---tilirf;,-1.1 7,.r.sii4.--da'-'4,-710:,4-1K-• :.*;_,, :-'1-r&--f‘t-Z.71,141-4-1.b4WW*.__:..,_ 34-a-----47.'.•!---,....!--""-::7,----..:E--...2- ..-----.-''.-*. ._...•• .. .1• ..: :. -, :.* .. - .i:.-.-::,!-_.--.-:::::',%--..„ .:.-1 ! . Tro! 4' R L � ... is II t .G - - .. Tic 'e- E - ft - .. . . T .____7- "----\\----- / • \ /1/------.-- •- ....•-.-.-W i ii..._:.1,,.... m..I-._-_..i:" .„7.1----NA r• 1 USES �fH�t7 I N 6 13rVIGE. lH ICH .DLO&K 7 THE SUIJ 4UT ALLOW/6%1 . MO MCNT _ LOUVS rRo'vIXX c-JHe rLUS LC&HT TA b - 0 - - - --- . . _ • . • }: . t . . • a 1-. _ . ISO.LATrS 1-1b.6..T6ffklE_KqING A\KLAi'D 1.1G1-1KIT&H1WE7 /6-,HP LALINPKIFS MOH LIMN& • . , • e a ) .,:. • ..: -------] i ! • ok011 NNS -I TT—T-7 • - '/ . --. / , r7r_ IGKIE_P FO MAXIMUM VENTILATIOlit avl Iii\..irm A\Nr-rHKou&H THE HON/1 -. j , f DEl(UYBEACH All- City All- City HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD 1II MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT I�I,. 1993 1993 2001 2001 Agent: Virginia Ritter Project Name: 101 NE 5th Street Location: Northwest corner of NE 5th Street and Fern Court. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of storm protection at 105 NE 5th Street, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H). BACKGROUND/PROJECT DESCRIPTION The 1,224 square foot residence was built in 1925 in the Mediterranean Revival style and is wood frame and stucco construction. It is considered a contributing building in the Del-Ida Park Historic District and is currently zoned Single Family Residential (R-1-AA). The house was moved to Lots 12 & 13 sometime after 1936. There are no recent administrative or Board actions pertaining to this property. The current proposal involves the installation armor screen hurricane protection to the doors and windows of the dwelling. ANALYSIS LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: The Board Shall Consider: (E)(8)(g) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color of the facade of a building in association with the predominant material used in surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district. Delray Beach Design Guidelines The following is a list of recommended treatments with respect to hurricane protection: • Window shutters that are removable are preferred. • If the tracks are to be installed year-round, they should be painted to match the exterior surface. • Accordion or roll-down shutters should only be considered when they are in locations not visible from the public right-of-way. Analysis The application is for the installation armor screening over the doors and windows of the extant historic building. Armor Screen is made from a polypropylene, woven monofilament geotextile that fulfills the 2001 Florida Building Code requirement for opening protection. The mesh is flexible and is attached over building openings by means of bolts which can be inserted at high Meeting Date: June 15,2005 Agenda Item: IV.A. 105 NE 5th Street—Installation of storm protection Page 2 level under eaves or to lintels etc, and at low level to earth anchors, concrete footings, pavers etc. The screening has several advantages over other forms of hurricane protection. It can be easily removed, folded, and stored after hurricanes, no tracks are required, it is relatively light in weight, it can be fitted over large areas and adapted to architectural details, it can be deployed quickly, it allows the penetration of light and can be seen through, and it allows easy access in and out of structures, which is important in an emergency. As no applications have been received for the installation of this product, there is no local evidence as to how it will perform in a hurricane; however, according to the attached information leaflet, Armor Screening received Miami-Dade approval in January 2000, and the attached Notice of Acceptance outlines the product specifications. As it is a relatively new product, the Design Guidelines do not make reference to armor screening and concentrate mainly on the installation of shutters. However, the Design Guidelines recommend the use of removable panels because they are not a permanent fixture on buildings. Armor screening can, therefore, also be regarded as appropriate as it can be removed after hurricanes and, further, as it is fixed to structures with unobtrusive anchors, it does not require the installation of permanently fixed tracks for panels. This is also in accordance with LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g), which. state that appurtenances on buildings should be visually compatible. Based on the above analysis, therefore, the proposal can be supported based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. It should be noted; however, that, in the event of a hurricane, an inspection of the property should be undertaken to assess the level of protection given by the armor screening. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the COA for 105 NE 5th Street by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) of the Land Development Regulations and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. C. Deny approval of the COA for 105 NE 5th Street by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) of the Land Development Regulations and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. RECOMMENDATION Move approval of the COA for 105 NE 5th Street by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) of the Land Development Regulations and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. Attachments: Location Map, Information Leaflet, Notice of Acceptance Report Prepared by: Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner 7 / i/ . / I 1 i N.W. 11TY ST_ N.E. ! 11TH ST. j i--U( I I I 111lII I II Q II II I I ]TI [7 •_ 111111111111111/ — I 1 X O N.E. 10TH ST. 0 0 i Q W N O Z ;N.E. 9TH ST_ AIIII ' N.W. 9TH ST. I -1 NM Lai — Q V MEM , Z —o > N.W. 8 H BOULEVARD EGEORCr__T!! 1kl ' �III �IIIN.W. 77H ST. . E 7TH ST. JP• O _ 1 ' I — [ 1— ,IILMINIIMPII •Z > 1 i f , I I I I I ► ¢ \` ? N.E. 7TH ST. _ N.W. 6TH ST_ 1 a a' N.E. 6TH ST_ z Z —1 7-----Th rii--1 , G,. , D m m \yr- , ).. .. e-cSk‘>-4G D cn • i z I �` N.E. 5TH TERR.rer Ir') 1 N.E_ 6TH Z ST. WOOD LANE I I I I I I I I , , ., , \\ \ , c, N.E. 5TH CT. 1 O` �/\ • \� �� N.E. 5TH ST_ \ —1� \ F��C ) z� z TRINITY N.E. 5TH ST. 1 Q } LUTHERAN ' I I I I I li W vi MIIMIMZ IJz U LAKE IDA ROAD N.E 41H / ST. \ 71 N.E. 4TH ST. POST _i •,, ...--•—........, r I CASON OFFICE METHODIST } } CHURCH > > - _ i Sc a Li______ -W t- 0 L_1 i J> > to Z '� QQ Q N --v7 rLJ acv NL.7 w L7 ILi Z Z — Z Z I N -mmor- DEL-IDA PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT CITY OF OELRAY BEACH. FL PLANNING&ZONING DEPARTMENT \ J -- D/GITAL 84SE MAP SYSTEM -- DRAWN BY: NM What they are saying about Armor Screen. This versatile system requires no tracks and is easily F.�s ' deployed on unobtrusive stainless steel mounting system �L 3l rs c� sLr' None of our units with Armor Screen protection suffered any damage.All other windward units had water damage averaging$2,500 each.As our help had left,1 (removable)without tools or great physical effort. • personally put up most of the screens. The protection went up very quickly and �' } • 'x ?s;, s , ' easily. Needless to say,we are very pleased with the Armor Screen system and " intend to install it on the balance of the units. Qlt Condo Assonation Manager,Donner Brown•Orange Beach,Alabama 1,1 (I•' • •9qn•, 5,• + ,$ r . tVile have been using Armor Screen on our houses for aver four years-before the 1Nf+ �t d\ F� • current building code.Armor Screen hos fulfilled a need particularly on the rear , porches where we often have three sets of sliders and butted 'ass windows. - .. "' r Y • , I Although our customers often elect impact glass windows on pad of the house, , r A most elect Armor Screen on the rear porches because of the cost savings. Angled Inverted Window Straight Balcony ro+taaa"iis li' *r-X , MXM `i r:K s 7 49 Signature Quality Homer,Inc,President,Anita Crogg•Melbourne Beach,Florida P .✓•1 0 m>•v,,.i's1+'•`Vt'i I' r They are wanderfull We woke up at din the morning in the midst of the storm, .p•it v C i Thank goodness for those screens•we were able to put them up during the storm in •,o m r we ' ,_.' e,,, / ° " p only 1/2 hour and then sit out on our lanai having a well deserved cup of coffee ,, �� t ffi4 while we watched the tree tops bend to the ground outside.You have a very special p { "+ technology there! The Armor Screen' Wind & Impact Abatement .44. a t, , X 3w` `1. ry i , Home owner,Marsha Bard•Anne Maria bland,Florida ' /K System is a flexible,transparent membrane designed tear r`' c = A "� ro° to withstand even the strop strongest hurricane winds I '2 a, ` ' e',a s,7,' . ` n " ..• s ``r14A , "With the unique Armor Screen Hurricane Protection System,ng have found there is g : r, ,`'' „r,*F'.. r Ii. t•o a qdn !eneedtospendadditionoltime,or compromise our buildingdesigns'tointegrate without rupture and to deflect large&small missiles. „ p t). r,4, 1 x tr — -1 r' ; " 4Ir ' •' hurricane hardening," The system is constructed of a technologically r, X $}, ' 'j Architect,CBE Group,Inc.•Randy Koblas•Miami,Florida advanced,lightweight fabric which is 95%solid and '�,t y":t°e rl ;,,•s ?"`' : , ,;.• '+ ' -. 6 r, n � 5%porous,allowing natural light and visibility while b 1 er S 9 J�" I / " 'We chose Armor Screen because ifprovidedi htwesthatotherhurricane i.,. d •,r eF Why Armor',,ScrPr t! ''t protection could not Ease of deployment and lightweight product allow our effectively eliminating high winds and driving rain x r xaf h l q ,. housekeeping staff and maintenance people to quickly put up and remove it,without intrusion. N�1^�". .4 r a y A requiring outside installation help is be hired.' ,-i�` " '' s�t"1 "r' ,, 1 *" ,' v 1 .. • Holiday Inn Manager,Scots White•Kissimmee,Florida ,rtd 1t ,t vl, tit uv 1 j I s'."; ,r "7 S � d r Compliance,Design and Manufacturing,References. C , ,' ^ l as a,,I I'',i wr q r ,% . •Eric Berch • 4 ` trss i MARATHON-. I.ASCE798 9 19CCI9andarAt Building Code d2 q� I vi s CONSTRUCTION ` r y ' t `� Tl a 2.ASTM D3786 1 I.Florida oval Bu ld nd Code ,<er '" s o•%s j l t 31 s t �y t ur r.CC("Mow? 3,ASTM D4355 ii, for de,Bu ld ng Code ,a ,� F ilk y't�i K t . } +Ss yr � CuV(a WINDOW!,&Dunm 12 H h Velocity Wind Zone iw9y „YK�.• �;,-: }�3 4.ASTM D4533 11 Mom-Dodo Test Protocols d t�'y s I L�'y,I+y k e s� F tut r cane Protection/Shutters ` mw .rw , Y Fl: +' ,tr'.. 1 s`Z y t 46 6. 5.ASTM Dd751 a.PA 201 Impact Tat ,rr,te 0 s py ,, ' e 6.ASTM D5621 b.PA'02 Uniform Stolle Pressure Air Tess emY }ST,� r r C " '" ' .,.4T'' t 7.ASTM E.1996 c.PA 203 Cyclic Pressure ATest - }' >4 8.ASTM E 1886 14.Texas Dept.of Insurance Building Code - ? f, e,�r v y^'t ,¢ Tic.561-E6918090•866•928.t719•fax:561.8(0.8098 S' a',y" sUA ,'', 1756 NE Sift Menu,8m IL•Boca Peon.FL,Lt471 'E r r "'ls }} S a Y Ema:l:uI Milw,con • www 0w,n.cnm l.o+2 s ''"a,& l.. I _;,.vc,T�, ,' ? -NI u • A; D ^v ytj ...._ 'Qe kk 7Jid* Ss .,Fy. '„` 2 k� ��a i�:•, ;k lHlyar* 4^,A p nl V 3003 von *All Rights Feservea 2002,Palenlea b Palenls Famine it'r 4 w F ��otlod pl d ga x.,'f�r .c r Y + y'v rv/ A . ' • , . . „ .. ' . ..,.. . . . . .. .•.. It's Hurricane protection that's transparent, easy to install, lightweight and unbelievably_ strong. Miami-Dade approved in January 2000, the patented Armor Freedom of design for architects, with strength respected by -. ±i ' •,i...n,„,,.,..'54C-7,F•1\.,,,,..,,.., Screen''System offers an innovative and economical alternative to traditional engineers. Applications that are impossible with other products are y 1_.... , I, rigid hurricane protection. accomplished with Armor Screen. Since our product is flexible, it can be ,L adapted to architectural details such as arched top windows, raised stucco , . Over 3,000,000 sq.ft. of the Armor Screen System has been installed bands,windowsills,landscaping and round columns. Large spans such as lanais p'i,o-- ...i across hurricane regions in the continental U.S., Hawaii and the and commercial storefronts are easily protected with Armor Screen f.• • • ,..z - • •''''.44..4- r'' ' :".: Caribbean. ..1.,i j, ,' .'1 • —..„.- • .- , .2i:•'-,_'e'S••••-•,J.-......,, Armor Screen's removable barriers are secured with , .21 ••••••‘,-',. :=1,-. • . . . ;., :• Armor Screen founders invented, designed , • •,' ', ''•••,,,'%'*•;Lc.,,,,2,,..f•-•,,,, unobtrusive, stainless steel anchors into the building -- • ...„,,,,..- s7 , ,,, and brought to market this unique and highly '',„•.,,,;•,•!,,A,, ... structure.A special"earth•anchor"allows our product — -'• engineered product. Armor Screen is now in its ,, ' ,, ,,•,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,•, to be fastened directly into the ground, even od con proYid. Actual Crc71:::',c;onc'Ing'shhOw7rt,,,,ir 20h w,dr b„Oh Prole:icon that won't spoil the view or°waren of sixth year of „, .• .i-- . i,rp,•-• ,'0,i,,•„, `,•••-, S'.;•,;.• -„•,--,- 4•--0;:‘ through brick pavers. '• 1,,•'', •.,4•,' ' • • :,4"'',.;is' '0';';',', F: this Coribbeon resort production ' M 1 1,I 1T,-,,.. 1.4...r.......-; ,,.-'-r ..4„,n,, .•.:.'',,', , -• •: •..,'r.:4,,',•,', .4.}..,-;.•'•e!•,;;,..':` -,.-,,,.• ...m...1..... Armor Screen is lightweight and easy to for the Florida Governor's award for • ,,: ......,,41111 vt, ,, ... ..,, . ...,....,,,,,.,.., , ' '';:,i',.'••;'•,-•''.',V" ' '":1.''''';-.\, -, • deploy,It can be put up without tools, in a ., ••,. innovation in technology, supported by , .:., .,, .. !..V.,...':474r; .' ''.'r>' '' . ' Z;,, '7 fraction of the time required for other emergency management personnel - the , ' 'd -• , products,Utilize existing staff and eliminate • Armor Screen System provides a state of il ;,' ,,,:•1•- ,,...„,.'4 +'•,• • ' '••'•. ..-4-',..",,,,••••:*•,' •.:.•- - •,,,•% i i . ,.. i.\ the need. to hire outside labor. , the art alternative against destructive wind ---Y.,* ,;''•;'.:,'?:..,' .;''''"•.'K''•,::;-- ....e• '''''''"t4 forces. • 1 • , , .•••'.1/w.. Maintenance-free. Worry-free. '.....,',.. Constructed completely of corrosion Don't be left in the dark. See 1 ilvar 'l ' ' ' • resistant materials without moving parts and what's happening with Armor ''••?*,:ye....,.`0,,",,,,,. ';'‘, .., . ..,4..: ' :144,00.•-•:-4•i0: ,`,.', ::'.' 4' ".`:- ,7,'"" backed by a warranty,Armor Screen takes care of you.You don't hove to Screen. Q1i X I.:.1'.1 ' t,. 11 I ' ...-5 ' ..:„..,,,,,,,y,, ,, ,„,:,,,,,;.(„s _.,..1.,. , . , . ,,.. ....: take care of it. Our unique interwoven design i',.....f.';,.. I 11'1 .,11,,,!.. . - 4--2tk,-,t,'}4.q, provides an excellent barrier to high '-'1'-• ... ,11•0 ' •••••• 5 . . A storm can't get through it but you can. A major drawback to winds and driving rain, yet you can lat'—=""-.1 ,;;i * .4.4'.,'' ''''sir. ' , ' LI ,1, 11, 2. : ' many shutter designs is that in keeping the bad weather outside they also see right through it. No more .• •••4•• - „ trap the building occupants inside.The flexible barriers of Armor Screen can claustrophobia or feeling trapped . • . ; ,..• , -. . ., . - ' ....... be arranged to allow for easy access in and_o_ut_of the structure as the behind your hurricane protection! ••••,-•-•-- „ '. • -' •'-'• • •••,- situation warrants.Emergency management personnel agree that this is a very ALF's won't have to evacuate. Put , . A Flexible product easily fitted around fixtures ,:i wirriF,,17:7,077..,i4,:,•,,,, .. , important feature that should your protection up ahead of time, ..I L an,.,arcotectural dutails. ' .-, ' ,. ,P17,:;%,ltiOlo.‘"`*— ,i '-.- . 'V',.,, ,..":"..- st... not be overlookedwhen without hang to wait until the last it,1•-•:‘,„ making your emergency plan, ',...;'1 4_,+Y ,,.5., EIR:','10 ii• ,, . ,L-• • minute.Stay functional and accessible ,,, ,.4,„„-'7777,-, ,,::.,A, Eosy to Core-shown here is ,, SEE THROUGH VVV' • .41 , . ?,.1 ,`!,',',,•.t.„.1.,,, ,,L;:‘, ;A: ,:',•• ',' '4 right up to the storm and open ,,-4, 1„".7...ipa!•,,. .'' ,,,,., 1.-5°°',"'''P'''""°' Ti, 4 whul on°mai hurricane,' ;l' ''1 ''..., '''„.:. ,7 j I I UP,.7LMra.hyt 7:rliZiq: •1 ri13: ',Vi immediately after. him when vtewed through} .:'," ''' '''''' . • ' iggatalitii4 '1r ', ..,• . r , 'Arnstir Screen .. I 7,e' lii•I 1 1 6:kttis ill(di I 4 ..• Wind tested to 276 MPH ; , ,,, I is. . . .._. 11'`'''''' ARMOR' i Armor Screen is ..... Miami-Dade Approved :,-- - I Impact.. Impact force five times greater than Miami•Dade large missile test—without damage. - ..________......_. ..._.. . . . . _. . . • • MI A M!DADE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FLORIDA METRO-DADE FLAGLER BUILDING BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE OFFICE(BCCO) 140 WEST FLAGLER STREET,SUITE 1603 PRODUCT CONTROL DIVISION MIAMI,FLORIDA 33130-1563 (305)375-2901 FAX(305)375-2908 NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE (NOA) Armor Screen Corporation 2001-A North Congress Ave. Riviera Beach,FL 33404 SCOPE: This NOA is being issued under the applicable rules and regulations governing the use of construction materials. The documentation submitted has been reviewed by Miami-Dade County Product Control Division and accepted by the Board of Rules and Appeals(BORA)to be used in Miami Dade County and other areas where allowed by the Authority Having Jurisdiction(AHJ). • This NOA shall not be valid after the expiration date stated below. The Miami-Dade County Product Control Division (In Miami Dade County) and/or the AHJ (in areas other than Miami Dade County)reserve the right to have this product or material tested for quality assurance purposes.If this product or material fails to perform in the accepted manner, the manufacturer will incur the expense of such testing and the AHJ may immediately revoke,modify,or suspend the use of such product or material within their jurisdiction. BORA reserves the right to revoke this acceptance,if it is determined by Miami Dade County Product Control Division that this product or material fails to meet the requirements of the applicable building code. This product is approved as described herein,and has been designed to comply with the High Velocity Hurricane Zone of the Florida Building Code. DESCRIPTION:"Armor Screen Series 2000"Flexible Wind Abatement System APPROVAL DOCUMENT:Drawing No.AS-001,titled"Armor Screen Series 2000 Flexible Wind Abatement/ Impact Protection System",sheets 1 through 8 of 8,prepared,signed and sealed by Thomas M.Kelaher,P.E.,last revision dated November 25,2003,bearing the Miami-Dade County Product Control Revision stamp with the Notice of Acceptancenumber and expiration date by the Miami-Dade County Product Control Division. MISSILE IMPACT RATING:Large and Small Missile Impact LABELING:Each screen shall bear a permanent label with the manufacturer's name or logo,city,state and the following statement: "Miami-Dade County Product Control Approved",unless otherwise noted herein. RENEWAL of this NOA shall be considered after a renewal application has been filed and there has been no • change in the applicable building code negatively affecting the performance of this product. - • TERMINATION of this NOA will occur after the expiration date or if there has been a revision or change in the materials,use,and/or manufacture of the product or process.Misuse of this NOA as an endorsement of any product,for sales,advertising or any other purposes shall automatically terminate this NOA.Failure to comply with any section of this NOA shall be cause for termination and removal of NOA: ADVERTISEMENT: The NOA number preceded by the words Miami-Dade County,Florida, and followed by the expiration date may be displayed in advertising literature. If any portion of the NOA is displayed,then it shall be done in its entirety. INSPECTION:A copy of this entire NOA shall be provided to the user by the manufacturer or its distributors and shall be available for inspection at the job site at the request of the Building Official. This•NOA revises NOA#03-0108.04 and consists of this page 1,evidence submitted page(s)as well as approval document mentioned above. The submitted documentation was reviewed by Helmy A.Makar,P.EE..� 4CO /J ���� /y Expiration Date:01/07/2008 l Z Approval Date:12/25/2003 e4Qo / /a3 Page I • GENERAL.NOTES: �r This,wind abatement/impact protection system Is design • ed and tested to comply with the • ,• ' high velocity hurricane zone of the 2001 Florida Building Code. & -.—'.---': •--.----.‹ L.• ''" io : Armor Screen is a flexible wind abatement and impact protection system utilizing a woven °' monofilament geotextile that fulfills the 2001 Florida Building Code requirement for opening = °.. ,rF,f protection; :` ` ;_ .. Geosynthetic hurricane screen: The hurricane screen shall be produced from a polypropylene, _.�i �,r.�\��� woven monofilament geotextile fabric with individual filaments woven into,.a basket weave %/ ,� '' ��� network and calendered such that the filaments retain dimensional stability relative to each other. ��r%�// The woven monofilament geotextile fabric shall have the following minimum average roll values: Examples of typical installations Grab Tensile Strength (ASTM D4632) 425 x 325 LBS J,,`� Puncture Strength '- -• (ASTM D4833) 130 LBS XI Mullen Burst (ASTM 03786) 675 PSI • �� Trapezoidal Tear (ASTM D4533) 150 x 125 LBS Wide Width Tensile Strength (ASTM D4595) 225 x 205 LBS/iN Wide Width Elongation (ASTM D4595) 22 x 21 % Apparent Opening Size 30 US STD SIEVE. Percentage of Open Area 5% • .. " .—"""'" Barrier can be mounted with opposing primary anchored perimeters in vertical, horizontal or any alignment appropriate to the structure being protected. STRAIGHT BALCONYSTORM BAR Screen unable to return should extend past protected opening by distance equal to minimum bib. � required deflection. !. !i. Design loads calculated to ASCE 7-98 as required by the prevailing building code, • ':` , I' Product marking-a label shall be affixed to the barrier with the following statement: "Armor Screen Corporation, Riviera Beach, Florida Miami-Dade County Product Control 1-1 A pproved" I I . . ALL GEOSYNTHETIC HURRICANE SCREEN ASSEMBLY INSTALLATION DETAILS DEPICTED WITHIN THESE e i DRAWINGS ARE TYPICAL FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THIS WIND ABATEMENT AND IMPACT PROTECTION -` ':•:: ' '• SYSTEM ONLY. ALL OTHER BUILDING COMPONENTS SHOWN HEREIN ARE DEPICTED AS EXISTING, AND . NOT CONSTRUCTED BY THE SCREEN COMPANY, ANGLED INVERTED WINDOW ````O� fi�tigE !�RPORA11oN • RFNMF4ING MITT TT! Sr.N F •• Thorns EL Keleher,ti't.r"• " 4 '�: c,s 41.0•;t'9�; PRODUCT REVISED 108 S.E.1i4th Tcrrec a : No.40159 fg am i,. ._:;'cictd Beach, ZrT 7E� aswmplyio$�viththeFlOikls M A. 9 FL 3 — • •*= Eaidiag Code o to 0 • EL.,4a�.ne)954-360.9823 " : Acceptance No Q'- ZO •p AI ►y-, • >Czpi lion 1?at ' v PRODUCT; ARMOR SCREEN SERIES 2000 •'. STATE OF Q 2 co N FLEXIBLE WINO ABATEMENT/IMPACT PROTECTION SYSTEM 7��•. . •• 0 g 4031 h.Convoy Aw., R:.-..B.00h, Fl.33404 •:"<`si••;O RID No���•,` J�3/p 3 j Miami Da rodact ttA Plc(56Q841-AE90 Fax(561)E4i-8192 t dSam jacri iacm 1/,S/ONpL> NG\‘� / Division REVISIONS OCTOBER 22,2001 2003 Table i Anchor Spacing Anchor Choices* Aug"st 27, Span Deflection 1' O/C 2' O/C 1 * 2* : • 3*. 4" November25, Iu 7 in:feet in inches Design Pressure" 318"open eye 3/8"bolt 12"open eye 112"bolt 'Y •4' 5.5" 130 65 X X X X i 0. '�� g 6' s.r 130 65 X X X _ V / • 6' _ 6.7" .92.75 46 X X X X Qs th 8' 8.5" 130 90 X z Q r, '� 1. 8' 8.5" 130 65 X X ttih$ • 8' 8.5" 115 58 X X X be g • 8' 8.5" 68.75 34 X X X X a $eua .. . 10' 16" 130 90 X a.0124 mgq 10' 16" 130 65 X X X • 10' 16" 94.75 47 X X X X 12' 21" 130 90 • X 12' 21" 130 65 • X X • 12' 21" 120 60 X X . X 12' 21" 69.75 35 X X X X `Q 14' 30" 130 80 . X �` 14' 30" 130 65 X X • i - 14' 30" 120 60 X X X t 14`.= 30" 64.75 32 X X X X 16;.:.,- 39" 130 75 X 16' 39" 130 65 • X X 16' 39" 110 55 X X X ``��tltllll/1j 16' 39" . 60 34.25 X X X X ``NNN�� *....���,/ 20' 36" 58.00 29.00 X X `�`.•' 4. • 24' 41" 48.00 24.00 X X tp~P't� - c.> T 0 s. .i+ CONCRETE: "Table is intended for drop-in and LDT anchors in concrete. i WOOD: Lag anchoring(incl.LDT)into wood as follows -. =N" j O 2 . Column 1': 3/8"thread,1.75"penetration into SYP(0.55 sg) e''0J Z ai Qom:O� Column 2*: 3/8"thread,3.1"penetration into SYP '��y� ``: Column 3': 1/2"thread,3.0"penetration into SYP ,/ Qfc N. Column 4': 1/2"thread,3.7"penetration into SYP '`,�.4( 1 t 11111►"`` EARTH: Specified earth anchor may be used with any of table choices. HOLLOW BLOCK Column 1',approved epoxy anchoring system for 3/8"&1/2"thread. NOTE: **Design pressure may be increased by 5%for negative loads TRACK SYSTEM:Table applies to track system,anchored with two 5/16"fasteners per cleat,as follows: -into hollow block,min.1 1/4"embed can be installed as in column 1' into concrete,min.1 3/4"embed can be installed as in column 3' In. r into concrete,min.2"embed can be installed as in column 4' �rtr 4 :: --into wood(SYP.sg.0.55),min.1"embed can be installed as in column 1* 1$.0 • . it d -into wood(SYP.Sg.0.55),min.2"embed installed as in column 3' ivy. a <� NOTES: �o,e` w I Anchor Spacing: varies inversely with pressure and is subject to rational analysis. 0 g A y Span:is measured anchor to anchor. y a z 51 Deflection:is minimum glass separation measured at mid-span of screen. . ° "' ANCHOR SPECIFICATION: 'Rd FA Part numbers: 3/8"Lag Anchor(AS9038S) �ggj'�t r o 1/2"Lag Anchor(AS9012S) E W w N� i g Tapcon 5/16",3/8",and 1/2"LDT can anchor in both wood and concrete ®� i d§ -- Gi ~wz " Drop-in Anchor. 3/8"Steel Drop-in anchor in 3000 PSI(min.)concrete,1 5/8"min. s� f' 0 m :2 embedment(H3038S) t` o 5 & 1/2"Steel Drop-in Anchor in 3000 PSI(min.)concrete,2"min. a u embedment(H3012S) Earth Anchor: Proprietary System: Stabilized 1/2"x 30"shaft with 4"helix Drawn by:T0:to 22 01 Working load 3150 LBS.(E7912P) SCALES !O SCALE • Soil Class: 5(medium dense coarse sand) Epoxy Anchor: Equal to Red Head umbrella inserts and screens with C7 adhesive. ING Nil AS-00I SHEET no. 2 DV 8 f REVISIDNS // ADOSTDiG TLLG CAROOF A ETRUSSES OCTOBER 22,2001 24'SUPPORTITC 21'�D Of VERTICAL August 27,2003 ` 11dRS 883tT RAM SEE TABLE 1 ' .= 25,2003 j . ' •1• •i ip.4 . >,`.k -- ALTE NATEANCHORING M Ji LAG,TURNED EYE OR PLAN >g o '� LDT Y � TRACK y REYOVEABLELAGCC Dogs +� e _� (AS10128,ASB0385) Coy 4s...4 .g.4 WSTALLED VERTICAL ONLY _m ,Y'i a. �. INTO THE TRUSS s, ra< m A 1=, z WITH314"M.EDGE DISTANCE j. C> z `� m SEE TABLE 1 a :F , » 1 17 7 uj IF S WARRED T w U Co _ I0 ``,,,fit*1111117CC ,''' urcr1/L'DROP-IN ANCHORS `CONCRETE �•�Ql•.••••,,d���/� 6 IF 7 SEE SHEET 1 ANCHOR SPECS. :. Q�••t4, ••..4.j XS, 11-I-II- . \0101"" ':::.*:C.) r• 0 p• -* -11 • O =11_ =I=1=ll:"I=Ir`I Q:v> U) k-o� TYPICAL ONE STORY ASSEMBLY 'J ' y' A INSTALLATION. �// -lc •4Ro,. zff7 I/11111111►t'�, • 318•ort/l !i „ • • w EYE or BOLT } 1i and DROP-IN `Q SEE TALE 1 ANCHORS SFEU1DF7 m maws AT Z •;! SEE:TABLET �ii "�1 rl`:. .,) i� r ti [OR TRACK} i;: k4v 0 r::-j o d 1 d m r, CITE e y �i._ , _ , II FEILITING_ _ •-•:-\ 1 „ w- O Ti CONCRETE SLAB E . 0 -11-II-11 1 �'. Ifli=+-'.1=11=11-11-11=11=11=i• g 5� I_ b II I:- 9 li 1—_I ( 11=11—II 8 is Xi iE it. ALTERNATE ASSEMBLY Drawn*TG,10-22-01 INSTALLATION scALD NO SCALE • B AT EXTERIOR SLAB ING Ill _ooi 2 IF T 20030 ARMOR SCREEN CORPORATION SST No3 [F 8 `' STORM BAR REVISIONS PAN 4' 5' 6' 8' 9'9" OCTOBER22.2oot MAX_PSF 135 86 60 135 60 August 27,2003 f DEFLECTION 5.5" 6.1" 6.7" 8.5" 16" Nu,,., 25 20o3 / SW 2"x6" X X X _ ALUM.TUBE I �a o a 2"i 6"x1/8" XillU141._p.s,,,...%%;* .�30SYP.4"x8" X0 a 1 -DEFLECTION;ACHIEVED BY ONE OR 'A',.1LIW��!_„ > o g N 'i MORE STORM BARS AND MAY BE P.�.�.....�ZI,/� o,z r, INCREASED WRH BLOCKING a ea $�g -ALUM.TUBE TO BE TYPE 6061-T6 • �� W c a t• �-:. -ANCHOR ENDS WITH 5/16"x 1-1/2"TAPCON (`:'+#*9�.`9•7,, �� .. Bra<W [4 Z G MIN.OR WITH ALUM MTD BRACKET AND .; /I IT • [r 2-1/4"x1-112"TAPCON SUBJECT TO:RATIONAL ANALYSIS -g 40 to A ATE L ti.: � ANCHOR r- pcnuts Z il Ili >7 \ ••••..• a011t/ �"1 • .,• 1111111f7// III Lt1 `N�� .b ii x.�-• STORM BAR d = :Y sr 4c ;,cc= DR'P-IL4 CONFIGURATION - .•*• ..ct*.0 z --�- ......02-, C DROP-IN M1CHORS X- .t : u ` 7C1 SEETABLE1 =1f=i±= • ► •o : I 0) =u=u..11. i goy• c , ; . ,- s ,3 43) u=!1 11- . 9 rl �i O �\ ill I-.Iinit=Il-uVI =11 +1';_i°u ,,*�►1111%�" - PORCH INSTALLATION x MIN m €ir z SEE'TABLE 1 REMOVABLE EYE R6 1:SHEET 1 IF 7 G -' 0 4' rillEDREE:11I0-9191 Ott 6'ti€ ,. g cc Tit , Its la I rp PAVER MALL '" " ' at�' STABIL rev VV1TH i41 gO a' Di CEINCRLIE A' io. V3 STABILMEll •a $ A te' 3 _1_i_i. x- c /,� �1� c~iw" - =U=II-11- ! 0 m - 1 11II=11. . . Tr-ilI rI g i II 5. : j o =11=11=11=11-II=11=11= ) Tarp j _ -1 la 1 Br01010:TO,1042-01 I I EARTH ANCHOR,4 DIM HELD( SCALD NO SCALE 1 EON HORIZONTALLY STABILIZED I 24'O.C. SEE:TABLE 1 20030 R SCREIEN CORPORATION MVG Ntt AS-001 I ALTERNATE ASSERT DISTAAT011 S EET Na 4 DF 8 fi{= E)QSTM VD ROUF TRUSSES f/ ` AT 24• ac REVISIONS `�, TRUSS BASET RATE ocroBE 22,2001 V1/411 \ August 27,2003 // Nwembr225, i 1 / i_ R 0k„ , 7.62mal 0tr,.._0 EMD� te�V " aC $ C �o.:aVa o q_ A6 g dd k —ma T AT SPAN 200 sa iZG `4- U g 0. : 1.0 _ d -r l , 11 lJ 2 law QQ. ! _ I p a ~~ ® FOR ANCHOR INSTALLATION LIJ irtal MAINTAIN AT LEAST MIN, EDGE DISTANCE AND FULL o� 6 7 C SPACINGFROM HANDRAIL ANCHORS ir BALCONY SCREEN ````„►►*►Irrrr�`'' i. 4l41 l ALTERNATE *;r -'� ASSEMBLY =( 'd o•2� .3JZ v�<c.;yo: D INSTALLATION • STRUCTURAL MEMBER 4 OF 7 ''it,/��i f t f ►p�o4�``73 rn ilh -61 �s► �' co 6 ,% MIN CLEARANCE is' O • SEE TABLE 1 E n;E-)e' iq $ e+ E AT MID-SPAN 6,lg JAll eal• 1.1&1.1.,!. St 6 IF 7I—.... ligq II; @W a E. 0 CITE ;l Y:. tiC ¢* - 1 - 4 Y ; : 4 V CLOSED O! SIDES AND �s Q �t �.I BOTTOM O g.- i ; ; �" -.' ANCHORED AT LOVER CORNERS a'L -I„��,__.71,11.1 . ' .o _,_• t11 ,� WINDOW SCREEN WWI by Tc, io-22-oi SCALD MI SCALE i a= =i, 1i=n= ��,=!-c= ' DtitG Ad 1 2003 © ARMOR SCREEN CORPORATION S ET tii5 QF 8 i,. i / REVISIONS Al SIDE uiru R a®BBETaIrS�p YfilW FI R A 27 2003 (PRAT Na 1F-17DD TTD TO BE SEWN D C DSYN} TIc October 22,2001 9 FIBER MATERIAL No 2003 QUAD FLAT FELLED SEMI May {noorporote snap hook.or D-rina /, I I- ("A■ u GED SYNTHETIC POI.YPRD Port Nos AS-5214,H51OD, AS9138, AS9I121 o U •E ■IUI THREAD * 130 C7) PLACES gd '4• Noll AT TOP AND BOTTOM EF a a p i 1 FABRIC SHEET �� A 1 7 1 a NIT_ 1E SIB N RA M Y U Y sTRAP� ■ • •.• • • •. •r i 0 •g� • Ifr- IT 11• • • • . ■ • I. }gyp O ~ • •- i• ,. •i• r •• in t h3 y g (�r�.' 3 ix 3;0. i E TOP STRAP DETAIL ° a m o m E A • IF 7 "Zb - • • e ■ • •.ure:nun.■n■:.er.•,m■,•,u.■nu■i.•n■:■ ■w:u, Q I. t : ;...-. ,,..1.v.; ! !. .1.1.,..!,.! LI.!..!! .!....!,I !,?.. 1. !..! 1,1.I 1.!to.,.r! i....„.. • ■ i • ■o - v ■ • L• e • • i a..r• a- i uCiii t -■ • i.i.. • • •�in n =• a; •,u• a a.a,i !v •�• a Al .E �� ���.. S WEAVE NOT UVN FOR �, r. �TIDN —' ,111{{IjJ' WELLIN GTON{ SYNTHETIC FIBER STRAP ‘`` '�� FINISH o• A PRODUCT MI. M-17OH �`�`��•�"••d`�Jj Ii, FOR APPROVED EQUAL) TO BE SEWN �� �; y i -�- -0--'- `0" �- - DUO GEDSYPITHETIC FIBER M IERIAL t=n=�t-tt= BUCKLE Wl STRAP AND TR GIJDE �:�,Q T ee, e X.fo EARTH ANCHOR,--�� SEE SECTION"JAB OF 7' 0 c SEE ANCHOR SPECIFICATIONS �r �r u+ ON SHEET 2OF7. SOIL SHALL�� F BOTTOM STRAP DETAIL e o d z BE MIN.CLASS 5(MEDIUM OF 7 :- ':� 0 m.o` (AT EARTH ANCHOR) Q • s• DENSE COURSE SAND) %y�.•, '�g� • • • • ■ •'• ■ -■ r.• a-■-•-• ■ • . ! ,• ■ •-- Li ■f■ ■,■IL■ • ■'e,:■,■,• • e • • •1■ . . . .■ ■I-■ en ■ ■ ■Ii '''',, {{{{���, rL rn(rinH.• ii i Cie,•qr•.'■ui,■rill■.i,i l:■n•+i i!.ei lik - MAV�W,Ai - y.. VE NIT SHINN FOR rr '�-+ o. • ��� " {: •! STRAP I`9 rt9 4 g sy t° 1Ill e - ODNC"EXTERIOR ,! IC s �' t! 0 4.SLAB .1��r PRODUCT WELLDiGTIINN� MSTI1TIC FIBER STRAP ?5 :;` r - J INTO GEDSYNTHETIC FIBER MATERIAL ••�: w¢ .1/2'013B'RAM.B,'IO'-DI HCI Ri •I;. OVED EQUAL) TD BE SEWN "L$ SEE NC OWL EN SHEET 2 • BUCKLE WITRIGIJr O) MOM • SEE SECTION:VS OF r m . G BOTTOM. STRAP DETAIL ®off o §:li • DF 7 CAT ANCHORAGE INTO CONCRETE) Y 0- z v� 85 ;• ��aSLFER r C (1a&B MODEL BUCKLE Drawn SCALE/ls KT S1 -01' I_ 2003 0 ARMOR SCREEN CORPORATION PIG EL AS-001 s{EET Pc6 DE 8 F yH LAG THREAD T1� EYE �T REVISIONS Li ni. 13/4' MIN BIDED. OCTOBER22,2001 iii + mrvir•-i-i i ririi,;f`),;T1.r/i11.I.ii,.r,ills■..4.1.4 AUg,,stE,•� . j JJJR7: HI ...MidJ "+" 1:1 FF • • • ■ • ■ .r• u • .1.,!,!,! !TT u ■ • �f(Sypifb8f'� 11.14 1 +_ _fail� M� .a.nn .w num ■w..nur• •,.•:'••:a • •i.nn• r•iu■.ii •• ,� _ ALIENATE 3ir DIN18d1N MP- O}IR '. :; - No GEB SYNTHETIC HURRIClM! SCREEN g n' °G [a1 YS r _ K ALTERNATE s TOP TRAP DETAIL h �"z4 f. 7 OF 7 FOR OPENING ID FEET BR LESS v wag. li c\ ° (;Thi STRAP DETAIL AT a o s r a - ALTERNATE CORNER DETAIL 7 a . <w �2 a 7 BF 7 tits =ADJACENT SCREENS r_z: 11111 iaaal � �11 lb.%%.N�A_• _ . „,...7.mas _ _ @:m - • ® ril SCREEN C1 ARI N 01JD ORD NM BUCKLE V/ STRAP AND TRIQ.IDE 111111111I SEE SECTION.'J/6 IF 7' `�‘‘ * Ili, VELUNSTL7i SYNTHETIC FIBER STRAP �� •.'".�d4. // PRODUCT NO. M-17DH `�Q•rtG, •;. ,, CDR APPROVED EQUAL) TO BE SEWN W INTO GEBSYNTHETIC FIBER MATERIAL V• . a Anchor Overlap) _-• ►VP ems- O 4,.. me NOTE: SCREENS MAY BE GROMMETED. =�'��` ���� TRACK DETAIL '''�i:HII p;;°.`` c..---1:,..7 .- - ,- ... ,1:...7 INSIDE MOUNT CEILING 2 R g e N 1 2 r. gT&II. a „gig WALL MOUNT „_ ' , n 841 ,E Drawn by:.TG, 10-22-01 INSIDE MOUNT SCALE' rEI SCALE FLOOR DWG to. AS-OOI 1 2003 CQARAAOR SCREEN CORPORATION s1EEf Nb 7 OF 8 1 REVISIONS, November 25, 2II1;� .I 250 R IMO O nb2 R t-SiD �►: r IS* . t , O 00 • L#1 } 0373 R MO_ re R323 I I 121 g 1 d F7.LLR 1 tlza ` `1r14i Q25D 1 ALUMINUM ALLOY BOOST5 a 3 00 a q .FILL -a - {�-a�-4 -ir TTMM(PARr#AS-1000) 47� ALUMINUM RIOT6005- 600575 0— _ — • 3.750 i $ i 375 } � VQ '°' O Q•�� N Y I- cc.• --- Lgpp—-� Q �J Z t~Qv0:z\= �'�.fi• ' Sys D-RING CARRIERS(AS-5214) • E E SPRING CLIPS.(H-5100) IE:D -- _ A 7• 3/8"KEYHOLE CLIPS(AS9138) _ s f j "' Oin - 1/2"KEYHOLE CUPS(AS9112) LI ' a 1: . :5116"TAPCONS(FT1356) `0 al 318"TAPCONS(FT15 ) ...,.,.,...,.....,.......,. R g"' i 8 1 ' ; 1/2"TAPCONS(FT1512) �®a,q 3/8"LAG ANCHOR(AS9038S) c ' '. 3/8"BOLT B1 3 _ 3IIuI,I II> o--4 1/2"LAG ANCHOR AS9112S — t • 1/2'BOLT(B15102S) rG.1022 01 SOLD NU SCALE IMAGES ARE REPRESENTATIVE AND NOT TO SCALE NU fa AS-001 2003 0 ARMOR SCREBJCORRORATION S}rf Na 8 QF 8 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD 0 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: June 15, 2005 . AGENDA ITEM: IV.B. ITEM: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness, Class V site plan, landscape plan, design elements and variance request for the relocation of two historic dwellings to the site of a contributing building within the OSSHAD.- ETD I I I ILI N.W.3RD ST. N.E. 3RD Sr. I I I GENERAL DATA: n ' • I Owner/Applicant Roger Cope • N.E. 2N0 ST. Agent Cope Architects, Inc. MN Iii p..1 Location 114 NE 1st Avenue _ . / , ;: • Property Size 0.23 acres irrA is-` is Future Land Use Map Other Mixed Use (OMU) L1 MI o-M • Current Zoning Old School Square Historic iIiii:i:iMI MI Ell Arts District(OSSHAD) - li I • • ■ �• N.E. Adjacent Zoning North: OSSHAD , ,sT ST. East: OSSHAD ■ South: OSSHAD a - is West: OSSHAD i- ini Existing Land Use Residential z 1 Proposed Land Use Office/Commercial ■ • 3 SCHOOL Water Service Available on site • <n SQUARE ' '`Flit Sewer Service Available on site ATLANTIC AVENUE E N U E I NyJ1 3 i ,.. Z : I .. . ... S.E 1ST ST. L 1 I. lT 1.1 LT---ir--1 T 1-I i 1 r--Z • • • • • 1 ITEM - BEFORE THE .BOARD The item before the Board is the approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness that incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for 114 NE 1st Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F): ❑ Class V Site Plan; U Landscape Plan; U Design Elements; and, U Variance Requests. BACKGROUND/PROJECT. DESCR£UP-TION The subject property is located on the west side on NE 1st Avenue approximately 150 feet north of NE 1st Street. The property consists of a single-story, 768 square foot single-family residence constructed in 1941. It is constructed in the Vernacular style and is considered a contributing structure within the Old School Square Historic District. The property is currently zoned Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD). The development proposal consists of the following: • Relocation of the existing house into a new position to the southwest corner of the site; • Relocation of two (2) additional historically significant dwellings from 350 and 362 NE 5th Avenue; • Conversion of the three (3) dwellings to offices; • The construction of a seven (7) space back-out parking lot adjacent to the rear (west) alley and the construction of a handicapped accessible space to the front of the property; and, • Associated landscaping. The site plan application also includes variance requests to the following section of the City's Land Development Regulations (LDR): • Variance request to reduce the required side yard setbacks along the north and south sides of the property from seven and a half feet (7'/') to four feet (4') [LDR Section 4.3.4(K)]. • Variance request for the elimination of a maneuvering area so that vehicles can directly back-out onto the adjacent street (NE 1st Avenue) [LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(2)]. 114 NE 1st Avenue-Class V Site Plan and Landscape Plan Page 2 SITE P._:L,AN ,ANALYSIS COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. LDR Section 4.3.4(K) Development Standards Matrix: The following table indicates that the development proposal complies with LDR Section 4.3.4(K) as it relates to the OSSHAD zoning district: Required Provided Building Height (max.) 35' Not provided Building Setbacks (min.) - Front 25' 25' Side Interior (north) 7.5' 4' Side Interior (south) 7.5' 4' Rear 10' 21' Maximum Lot Coverage 40% 30.8% Open Space 25% 49.9% LDR Section 4.3.4(K) Development Standards Matrix Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), the required side interior setback for properties within the OSSHAD zoning district is seven and a half feet (7%2`) and the proposed side interior setbacks are four feet (4'). The applicant has requested a variance from LDR Section 4.3.4(K) Pursuant to LDR Section 2.2.6(D), the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) shall act on all variance requests within an historic district, or on a historic site, which otherwise would be acted upon by the Board of Adjustment. Prior to granting a variance, HPB must make the following findings pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(A)(5): (a) That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not generally applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings subject to the same zoning (The matter of economic hardship shall not constitute a basis for the granting of a variance); (b) That literal interpretation of the regulations would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties subject to the same zoning; (c) That the special conditions and circumstances have not resulted from actions of the applicant; 114 NE 1st Avenue-Class V Site Plan and Landscape Plan Page 3 (d) That granting the variance will not confer into the applicant any special privilege that is denied to other lands, structures, and buildings under the same zoning. Neither the permitted, nor nonconforming use, of neighborhood lands, structures, or buildings under the same zoning shall be considered grounds for the issuance of a variance; (e) That the reasons set forth in the variance petition justify the granting of the variance, and that the variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure; and, (f) That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with general purpose and intent of existing regulations will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(J), in acting on a variance request the Board may also be guided by the following as an alternative to the above criteria: (1) That a variance is necessary to maintain the historic character of property through demonstrating that: (a) A variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare; (b) Special conditions and circumstances exist, because of the historic setting, location, nature, or character of the land, structure, appurtenances, sign, or building involved, which are not applicable to other lands, structures, appurtenances, signs, or buildings in the same zoning district, which have not been designated as historic sites or a historic district nor listed on the Local Register of Historic Places; (c) Literal interpretation of the provisions of existing ordinances would alter the historic site to such an extent that it would not be feasible to preserve the historic character, of the historic district or historic site; and, (d) The variance requested is the minimum necessary to preserve the historic character of a historic site or a historic district. (2) Or, as an alternative to Sub-Section (J)(1), that a variance is necessary to accommodate an appropriate adaptive reuse of a structure within a Historic District or upon a Historic Site through demonstrating that: (a) A variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety, or welfare; (b) The variance would not significantly diminish the historic character of the Historic District or Site; and, (c) That the variance requested is the minimum necessary to effect the adaptive reuse of an existing structure or site. (3) The Board shall otherwise follow procedures and impose conditions as required of the Board of Adjustment. 114 NE 1st Avenue-Class V Site Plan and Landscape Plan Page 4 Variance Request: The development proposal includes a request for a variance from LDR Section 4.3.4(K), as it pertains to the side street building setback requirement. The specific variance requested, and justification statement as supplied by the applicant is as follows: "We are seeking to reduce the side yard setbacks for this project from 7.5' to 4' to better enhance the overall site planning issues we are trying to promote—.in keeping with the Old School Square Historic Arts District. Not the least of which is a centrally located entry courtyard of reasonable width, which occurs between the two (2) 1-story structures to the rear of the property. Without the variance the buildings would only allow the courtyard to be +-14'8" wide. With the variance, the width increases to +- 21'-8", which we believe to be critical to the success of the overall site layout and project in general. This request is in no way contrary to public interest, safety or welfare. As a special condition, the property immediately to our south has its rear 2- story structure sitting 4' off its property line; therefore we are asking to emulate that distance. Consistency from site to site better preserves the character of the Historic District, as the LDRs promote. The variance requested is the minimum necessary to preserve the historic character of our historic setting (site) within the OSSHAD district." Variance Analysis: The above rational addresses the required findings of LDR Section 4.5.1(J)(2) as granting the variance will accommodate an appropriate adaptive reuse of a structure within a Historic District and will also accommodate the adaptive reuse of the two historically significant structures that will be moved to the district. This can be demonstrated by: a) Granting the variance will have a positive effect on the public welfare as three historically significant structures will be reused and the two structures that are being moved will be saved from possible demolition due to the redevelopment of their current site. Granting the variance request will allow an increased distance between the two structures to the rear of the site. This will contribute to public safety, especially with regard to those working in the structures, as, in the event of fire, the greater distance will help to prevent any fires spreading. Granting the variance will not be contrary to the public welfare. b) Granting the variance will contribute to the character of the historic district as two historically significant structures will be imported to the OSSHAD. The two structures are compatible in age and style with the OSSHAD and, when the district is re-surveyed, it is likely that they will be classed as contributing 114 NE 1st Avenue-Class V Site Plan and Landscape Plan Page 5 buildings, therefore, increasing the percentage of contributing buildings within the OSSHAD. c) The variance requested is the minimum required to give the entry courtyard a reasonable width and is consistent with the setback of the historic property to the south. Therefore, the variance request addresses the required findings of LDR Section 4.5.1(J)(2) and can be supported. LDR Section 4.4.24 Old School Square Historic Arts District(OSSHD) Parking: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(4)(a), all non-residential uses, with the exception of restaurants, shall provide one parking space per 300 sq.ft. of total new or existing floor area being converted to a non-residential use. The total floor area of the three structures is 2,833 square feet (3,085 square feet including the enclosed porch of the proposed front structure), therefore, ten (10) parking spaces are required. The proposal includes seven (7) back-out spaces (including one compact space) at the rear (west) alley, and one handicapped accessible space to the south of the front building, which will be accessed from NE 1st Avenue. The proposal therefore includes a total of eight (8) on-site parking spaces. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(5), if it is impossible or inappropriate to provide required parking on-site or off-site, pursuant to Section 4.6.9(E)(4), the in-lieu fee option provided in Section 4.6.9(E)(3) may be collected. The proposal therefore includes the purchase of two (2) in-lieu parking spaces at $6,000 each. It is noted that the applicant is proposing the installation of the handicapped accessible space accessed from NE 1st Avenue resulting in the loss of one (1) on-street parking space. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(2), access which conforms with minimal aisle standards and which includes maneuvering area so that a vehicle must be able to enter and exit the parking area onto a street or alley in a forward manner shall be provided. The proposed handicapped accessible space will result in back-out parking onto NE 1st Avenue which does not conform with this section of the LDRs. A variance request has been submitted; however, staff does not support the request. If the variance request is not granted, the space must be relocated to the back-out parking spaces accessed from the rear (west) alley. This will result in the need to increase the in-lieu request to three (3) spaces. Variance Request. The development proposal includes a request for a variance from LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(2), as it pertains to the elimination of a maneuvering area so that vehicles can directly back-out onto the adjacent street (NE 1st Avenue). The applicant has justified 114 NE 1st Avenue-Class V Site Plan and Landscape Plan Page 6 the variance request by stating that removing the space from the front of the property would result in a further in-lieu space being required, which would cost an extra $6,000. The applicant also stated that having a parking space to the front of the property would contribute to the residential appearance of the development and that other properties in the OSSHAD have back-out parking. The applicant also stated that, as NE 1st Avenue is not a busy right-of-way, granting the variance would not be contrary to the public interest, safety or welfare. Variance Analysis: If the front parking space is removed from the proposal resulting in the design being one space short, the applicant has the option of purchasing three in-lieu spaces as opposed to two. As the applicant has this option, granting the variance cannot be regarded as being necessary to accommodate the appropriate adaptive reuse of the structures as LDR Section 4.5.1(J)(2) requires. Therefore, as the applicant has this option, and a variance is not necessary, the request cannot be regarded as being the minimum necessary to effect the adaptive reuse. Also, as the proposed variance would permit a back-out parking space onto NE 1st Avenue, there is concern that this would be contrary to the safety or general welfare of the public due to possible site visibility issues related to the on-street parking within the right-of-way adjacent to the proposed driveway. Both vehicular and pedestrian safety could be compromised. The use of this space would also cause the loss of at least one public parking space from the front of the property. A parking space to the front of a property may give a residential appearance; however, in this case, the proposed parking space is handicapped accessible. This will not give a residential appearance because of the markings and signage required for handicapped accessible parking spaces. Further to the above, a similar variance request for 203 NE 1st Avenue, Saraga & Lipshy Office, was denied by the HPB at their meeting of August 18, 2004. Based upon the above, the requested variance does not meet the intent of LDR Section 4.5.1(J) and should therefore be denied. LDR Chapter 4.6 Supplementary District Regulations: Walls, Fences, and Hedges: The proposal includes the installation of a new picket fence and gate along the front (east) property line. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.5(C), walls, fences, or hedges located in a required front yard or street side yard shall not exceed six feet (6') in height. Details of the fence and gate including their material, design and height must be submitted. 114 NE 1st Avenue-Class V Site Plan and Landscape Plan Page 7 A wood picket fence and gate are also to be erected between front structure and the two rear structures. Their details must also be submitted. Signs: As the three structures are to be used as offices, the details of any proposed signage must be submitted. Site Lighting: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.8, site lighting is required to be provided. The proposal includes the installation of three (3) decorative lighting poles (16') high with decorative lighting fixtures. The overall height of the poles and fixtures must be provided along with details of their material. In accordance with LDR Section 4.6.8, a photometric plan has been provided. No details have been provided for any wall mounted lighting fixtures. If any are proposed, details of their material, design and proposed location must be submitted. Sidewalks: A paver brick sidewalk and spun concrete lighting are to be provided on NE 1st Avenue. This requirement has been added as a condition of approval. OTHER ITEMS: Pollution Prevention Plan: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.17, two (2) copies of a pollution prevention plan must be provided. Undergrounding of Utilities: Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.8, utility facilities serving the development shall be located underground throughout the development. All existing and proposed utilities associated with the development must be relocated underground, and is attached as a condition of approval. Site Plan and Engineering Technical Items: The following items remain outstanding and must be addressed prior to building permit submittal: 1) That a copy of the title certificate is submitted. 2) That a copy of a letter of notification to utility providers to which a copy of the site plan or plat is provided is submitted. 114 NE 1st Avenue-Class V Site Plan and Landscape Plan Page 8 3) That the approximate locations of aboveground and underground utilities are shown. 4) That the F.E.M.A. Flood Plain designation for the property , the base flood elevation, and a statement as to how provisions of the Flood Damage Regulations (Section 4.5.4) will be met are provided. 5) That a pollution prevention plan is submitted. 6) That existing elevations on the centerline of the alley are submitted. 7) That typical cross sections from the building to the adjacent right-of-way or adjacent property at all property lines are submitted. Pay particular attention to grade differential from the proposed site to existing adjacent properties and show the existing grades on adjacent property. 8) The site is required to retain 5 year 1 hour storm (3.2") in addition to meeting water quality criteria (1"). Provide signed and sealed drainage calculations and indicate how storm water will be retained on site. 9) Provide certified exfiltration trench test results. 10)Show the nearest existing drainage structures if applicable. 11)Provide paving cross section. 12)The Parking layout and striping must follow the City of Delray Beach standards. Provide standard City of Delray Beach parking stall detail. 13)Install brick paver sidewalk along Northeast 1st Avenue per Pineapple Grove Plan. 14)Clearly dimension the limits of the right of way. 15)Indicate the rim and invert of upstream and down stream manholes of proposed sewer laterals. 16)Engineer of record is to field verify location, size and depth of existing City of Delray Beach utilities prior to submitting Final Engineering Plans. 17)Provide on the plans the current City of Delray Beach standard construction details as applicable. 18)Show the existing curb along NE 1st Ave. 19)Revise the orientation of the engineering plan. 114 NE 1st Avenue-Class V Site Plan and Landscape Plan Page 9 20)Revise the site plan to be 1"= 20' or 1" = 30' per LDR's, Engineering plan and site plan shall be in Engineering scale, not architectural scale. 21)Indicate the location of irrigation water meters (east of 1-95 only). 22. All lighting fixtures shall be City standard acorn fixtures, see detail RT 11.1. LANDSCAPE " ANALYSIS The proposed landscaping consists of existing trees (some of which are to be relocated), new trees, and new shrubs. Existing trees that are to remain in their current location include a Cassia and an 'Oak- like' tree at the northwest corner of the site adjacent to the rear car parking area, and a Double Foxtail adjacent to the proposed handicapped accessible parking space. Relocated trees include two Coconut Trees on the south boundary of the site. New trees include a Signature Tree, a Green Malayan Coconut Tree in the center of the three structures, two Japanese Fern Trees adjacent to the rear car parking area, two Live Oak Trees to the front (east) property line, three Sable Palms adjacent to the front structure at the north property line, and two Simpson Stoppers at the rear car parking area. Trees that are to be removed from the site include a Slash Pine, a Bismarckia, a Starfruit, a Yellow Tabebuia, and a Phoenix variety. The new proposed plants and shrubs include White Bird of Paradise, Bougainvillea, Wild Coffee, Seminole Pink Hibiscus, Podocarpus Hedge and Variegated Shell Ginger. There will be grass areas to the front (east) of the property and between the three structures. There will be a water feature between the two structures to the rear of the property. Landscape Plan Technical Items: The following item remains outstanding and must be addressed prior to building permit submittal: 1. The symbols "JAT" and "CRO" appear on the landscape plan but there is no reference to them on the plant list. This must be clarified. 2. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.16(E)(1), xeriscape principles shall be utilized in landscape designs and installations. Sod should be eliminated in some of the more confined areas such as the area adjacent to the center fountain, the area between the rear building and rear parking lot, and the area between the front driveway and perimeter hedge. Ground cover, used as a substitution for sod, would reduce maintenance and water consumption. 3. The planting on the east side of the building should be tiered to a greater extent. 114 NE 1st Avenue-Class V Site Plan and Landscape Plan Page 10 REQUIRED FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to the following areas: Section 3.1.1(A) - Future Land Use Map: The subject property has a Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designation of Other Mixed Use (OMU) and a zoning designation of Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD). The OSSHAD zoning district is consistent with the OMU FLUM designation. Pursuant to LDR Sections 4.4.24(B)(3), within the OSSHAD zoning district, business and professional offices are allowed as permitted uses. Based upon the above, it is appropriate to make a positive finding with respect to LDR Section 3.1.1(A). Section 3.1.1(B) - Concurrency: As described in Appendix A, a positive finding of concurrency can be made as it relates to water, sewer, streets and traffic, drainage, parks and recreation, open space, and solid waste. Section 3.1.1(C) - Consistency (Standards for Site Plan Actions): As described in Appendix B, a positive finding of consistency can be made as it relates to Standards for Site Plan Actions. Section 3.1.1(D) - Compliance with the Land Development Regulations: As described under the Site Plan Analysis of this report, a positive finding of compliance with the LDR's can be made, when all outstanding items attached as conditions of approval are addressed. Section 2.4.5(F)(5) - Compatibility (Site Plan Findings): The approving body must make a finding that development of the property pursuant to the site plan will be compatible and harmonious with adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole, so as not to cause substantial depreciation of property values. The proposal is to move two historically significant structures to a site containing a contributing building in the OSSHAD Historic District and use all three structures as offices. The two structures to be moved to the site are appropriate for the OSSHAD Historic District in terms age and architectural style. 114 NE 1st Avenue-Class V Site Plan and Landscape Plan Page 11 Zoning Designation: Use: North: OSSHAD Multi-Family Residential South: OSSHAD Single-Family Residential East: OSSHAD Multi-Family Residential West: OSSHAD Educational/Museum Facility Compatibility with the adjacent properties is not a concern as there are many similar office uses mixed with residential uses within the OSSHAD. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: A review of the objectives and policies of the adopted Comprehensive Plan was conducted and the following policy is noted: Housing Element Policy A-12.3: In evaluating proposals for new development or redevelopment, the City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. As discussed previously, the subject property is compatible with the adjacent properties with regard to use. Further, the development proposal will not have a negative impact on the surrounding area with regard to the criteria stated above (noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns). Transportation Element Policy D-2.2 — Bicycle parking and facilities shall be provided on all new development and redevelopment. A bike rack has been included in the proposal. LDR Section 2.4.5(F)(5) - Compatibility (Site Plan Findings): The approving body must make a finding that development of the property pursuant to the site plan will be compatible and harmonious with adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole, so as not to cause substantial depreciation of property values. The subject property exists within the OSSHAD zoning district and is bounded by residential and educational/museum uses. Compatibility with uses is not a concern, as the proposed office development would be permitted on the surrounding properties and is already in existence within the OSSHAD. The age and architectural style of the two buildings to be moved to the site are consistent with the OSSHAD and, as the two buildings could be classed as contributing at the next OSSHAD survey, the percentage of contributing buildings could increase within this historic district. Furthermore, moving 114 NE 1st Avenue-Class V Site Plan and Landscape Plan Page 12 the two structures to this site will prevent their loss through demolition as their current site is to be redeveloped. Based upon the above, the proposal will be compatible and harmonious with adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole; therefore positive findings can be made with regard to LDR Section 2.4.5(F) (5). DESIGN,ELEMENTS ANALYSIS LDR Section 2.4.6(H)—Certificate of Appropriateness: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H)(5), the Board must make a finding that any Certificate of Appropriateness which is to be approved is consistent with Historic Preservation purposes pursuant to Objective A-4 of the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and specifically with the provisions of LDR Section 4.5.1. Future Land Use Element Objective A-4: The redevelopment of land and buildings shall provide for the preservation of historic resources. The objective shall be met through continued adherence to the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance and the following policies: Future Land Use Element Policy A-4.1: Prior to approval or recommending approval of any land use or development application for property located within a historic district or designated as a historic site, the Historic Preservation Board must make a finding that the requested action is consistent with the provisions of Section 4.5.1 of the Land Development Regulations relating to historic sites and districts and the "Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines". Development Standards LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(7), provide Guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The applicable standards are as follows: (E) (4)A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E) (7) The construction of new buildings or structures, or the relocation, alteration, reconstruction, or major repair or maintenance of a non-contributing building or structure within a designated historic district shall meet the same compatibility standards as any material change in the exterior appearance of an existing non- contributing building. Any material change in the exterior appearance if any existing non-contributing building, structure, or appurtenance in a designated historic district shall be generally compatible with the form, proportion, mass, 114 NE 1st Avenue-Class V Site Plan and Landscape Plan Page 13 configuration, building material, texture, color, and location of historic buildings, structures, or sites adjoining or reasonably approximate to the non-contributing building, structure, or site. In addition, LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8) states that all improvements to buildings, structures and appurtenances within a historic district shall be visually compatible and that visual compatibility shall be determined upon criteria (a) through (k). The criteria applicable to the development proposal are as follows: (a) Height: The height of proposed buildings or modifications shall be visually compatible in comparison or relation to the height of existing structures and buildings. (c) . Proportion of Openings (Windows and Doors): The openings of any building within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the openings exemplified by the prevailing historic architectural styles within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors to the height of windows and doors among buildings within the district shall be visually compatible. (d) Rhythm of Solids to Voids; Front Façades: The relationship of solids to voids in the front façade of a building or structure will be visually compatible with the front façades of historic buildings or structures within the district. (t) Rhythm of Entrance and/or Porch Projections: The relationship of entrances and porch projections to the sidewalks of a building shall be visually compatible with the prevalent architectural styles of entrances and porch projections on historic sites, buildings, or structures within a historic district. (h) Roof Shapes: The roof shape of a building or structure shall be visually compatible with the roof shape of a historic site, building, or structure within a historic district. (j) Scale of a Building: The size of a building, the building mass in relation to open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, and porches shall be visually compatible with the building size and building mass of historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation recommend that: A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment. Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property shall be preserved. 114 NE 1st Avenue-Class V Site Plan and Landscape Plan Page 14 The Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines include the following with regard to the relocation of buildings: Relocation of buildings is recommended only as a last resort, when there are no other preservation alternatives and the destruction of the historic property at its present location is imminent. If a property is moved, it may lose its historic significance unless it can be demonstrated that: • The property was moved prior to its period of significance; • The new location is sufficient in size and character to recall the basic qualities of the original historic environment and setting; • The property is oriented appropriately in relationship to its historic natural and/or manmade surroundings; and, • The relationships between such historic features as landscaping and foundations are maintained. When buildings are moved into a local historic district, the Historic Preservation Board must determine at a minimum: • Whether or not the character of the relocated buildings are similar in scale, massing height and setting with the majority of the contributing structures that make up the historic district; • Whether or not the proportion of the buildings moved into the historic district is significantly higher than the number that originally comprised the historic district; and • Whether or not the relocated buildings maintain their original integrity in form and materials as well as their original context with regard to their relationship to other buildings, orientation, setback and important landscape features. For instance, a building in situ overlooking the beach would not be appropriately relocated along a major commercial or transportation corridor, such as Atlantic Avenue. Analysis: The proposal is to relocate two historically significant structures from NE 5th Avenue to a site at NE 1st Avenue which contains a contributing building within the OSSHAD. All three structures will then be used as offices. The relocation of a structure should only be considered as a last resort when its demolition is imminent. In this case, the site of the two dwellings to be moved has been marked for redevelopment and it is certain they will be demolished if they are not relocated. The existing contributing building is a one-story, Frame Vernacular structure that was constructed in 1941. The structures to be moved to the site are one-story Frame 114 NE 1st Avenue-Class V Site Plan and Landscape Plan Page 15 Vernacular structures that were constructed in 1921 and 1922. Furthermore, all three structures have pitched roofs and windows of a traditional design, and all three have been relatively unaltered externally. The structures to be relocated are therefore compatible with regard to age, style, construction, mass, roof shape, and height with the existing contributing structure and the other structures within the OSSHAD. The applicant will be using the three structures as offices and while this may involve some interior alterations, the external appearance of the structures will be unaltered. Their original form and integrity will therefore remain intact. The relocated structures could lose their historic significance through being moved as three structures will be positioned on a site designed for one structure. Furthermore, the two structures to the rear of the site will be facing the alley as opposed to NE 1st Avenue. It must be taken into account; however, that the two structures to be moved are currently neither within a historic district nor listed on the Local Register, therefore, the applicant has no obligation to save them. The structures are; however, good examples of an architectural style from the 1920's and are attractive dwellings which deserve to be saved. For this reason, the proposal can be supported. REVIEW BY. OTHE:RSx Community Redevelopment Agency: At its meeting of May 26, 2005, the CRA recommended approval of the development proposal. Pineapple Grove Design Committee: At its meeting of June 1, 2005, the Pineapple Grove Design Committee recommended approval of the development proposal with the following comments: 1) Why is the front house separate from the rear property by a continued fence with a small gate? 2) It appears there is no handicap access from the front property to the rear property without going through grass? 3) It also appears to be a long trek through grass (about 50'), then through a small gate, then another 60+' to the street for the garbage pick-up of two containers. 4) We are not opposed to the back-out handicap parking space in the front since the traffic count on NE 1st Avenue is very low and we feel the "look" is more residential in character. A letter has been sent to the owners of property within a 500' radius of the subject property to inform them of the proposal and the two variance requests. Letters of objection or support, if any, will be presented at the Historic Preservation Board meeting. 114 NE 1st Avenue-Class V Site Plan and Landscape Plan Page 16 ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION The development proposal consists of the relocation of two historically significant dwellings from 350 and 362 NE 5th Avenue to 114 NE 1st Avenue, which currently contains a contributing building within the OSSHAD. The proposal will save the two structures and will ensure that they are adapted for an appropriate and sustainable reuse and that they will receive ongoing maintenance and repair. The structures will be compatible with the OSSHAD and the proposal is consistent with Sections 2.4.5(F)(5), 2.4.6(H)(5) and 4.5.1(E) of the Land Development Regulations, the Objective and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan and design elements for 114 NE 1st Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to conditions. C. Move denial of the Certificate of Appropriateness and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan and design elements for 114 NE 1st Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION By Separate Motions: - Variance Requests: Setbacks Approve the variance to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), to reduce the required side interior setbacks (north and south) from seven and a half feet (7%2`) to four feet (4') by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in LDR Section 4.5.1(J). 114 NE 1st Avenue-Class V Site Plan and Landscape Plan Page 17 Parking Deny the variance to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(2), for the elimination of a maneuvering area so that vehicles can directly back-out onto the adjacent street (NE 1st Avenue) by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet the criteria set forth in LDR Section 4.5.1(J). Site Plan: Move approval of the Class V site plan for 114 NE 1st Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: 1) That four copies of revised plans are submitted addressing the Site and Engineering Plan Technical Items as indicated in the staff report, and the listed conditions. 2) That the heights of the three structures are noted on the drawings. 3) That the photometric plan is revised to contain a notation regarding the height of the proposed light fixture/pole. 4) That all existing and proposed utilities associated with the development must be located underground and that a note be provided on the site plan to this effect. 5) That details of any proposed wall mounted lighting fixtures are submitted. 6) That details of any proposed signs are submitted. 7) That a color rendering and paint samples are provided. 8) That details and specifications of any proposed buffers, fencing, walls, and gates are submitted. 9) That details of the trash and recyclable collection area screening are submitted. 10) That the handicapped accessible parking space is moved from the front of the property to the back-out parking area at the rear of the property. 11) That three in-lieu parking space be requested, approved and paid for before the issuance of a Building Permit. 12) That a paver brick sidewalk and spun concrete lighting are provided on NE 1st Avenue. 114 NE 1st Avenue-Class V Site Plan and Landscape Plan Page 18 Landscape Plan: Move approval of the landscape plan for 114 NE 1st Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: 1. That four copies of the revised plans are submitted which address the Landscape Technical Items. 2. That additional landscape material is installed to screen the proposed refuse area from view of the parking area. Design Elements: Move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness of the design elements for 114 NE 1st Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Attachments:Appendices A and B, Photographs, Survey, Site Plan, Photometric Plan, Landscape Plan Staff Report Prepared by: Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner APP,E.;NDI,X� A ` CO N;C U R:R EN C,Y;'FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1(B) Concurrency as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs of the requested land use and/or development application will not exceed the ability of the City to fund and provide, or to require the provision of, needed capital improvements for the following areas: Water and Sewer: Water exists on site via a 2" service lateral connection to the 8" main on NE 1st Avenue. Sewer requirements are met by the 8" main located in the alley to the rear of the property. Adequate fire suppression is available via an existing fire hydrant located at the intersection of NE 1st Avenue and NE 1st Street. Streets and Traffic: The subject property is located in the City's Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA), which encompasses the CBD, CBD-RC and OSSHAD zoning districts. The TCEA exempts the above-described areas from complying with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. The applicant submitted a traffic statement indicating that the proposed office use will generate 55 Average Daily Trips (ADD. Parks and Recreation Facilities: Park dedication requirements do not apply for non-residential uses. Thus, the proposed development will not have an impact with respect to this level of service standard. Solid Waste: The 2,833 square foot office use will generate 7.65 tons of solid waste per year [2,833 sq. ft. x 5.4 lbs. = 15,298 lbs./2,000 = 7.65 tons]. The existing residence generates 1.99 tons per year. Thus, trash generation will increase by 5.66 tons. The trash generated by this proposal can be accommodated by existing facilities, therefore, a positive finding with respect to this level of service standard can be made. Drainage: Drainage will be accommodated via a 25' exfiltration trench in the rear car parking area. • APPENDIX B STANDARDS FOR' SITE PLAN ACTIONS , A. Building design, landscaping, and lighting (glare) shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent B. Separation of different forms of transportation shall be encouraged. This includes pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles in a manner consistent with policies found under Objectives D-1 and D-2 of the Transportation Element Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent C. Open space enhancements as described in Policies found under Objective B-1 of the Open Space and Recreation Element are appropriately addressed. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent D. The City shall evaluate the effect that any street widening or traffic circulation modification may have upon an existing neighborhood. If it is determined that the widening or modification will be detrimental and result in a degradation of the neighborhood, the project shall not be permitted. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent E. Development of vacant land which is zoned for residential purposes shall be planned in a manner which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent Appendix B Standards for Site Plan Actions Page 2 F. Vacant property shall be developed in a manner so that the future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; complementary to adjacent land uses; and fulfills remaining land use needs. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent G. Redevelopment and the development of new land shall result in the provision of a variety of housing types which shall continue to accommodate the diverse makeup of the City's demographic profile, and meet the housing needs identified in the Housing Element. This shall be accomplished through the implementation of policies under Objective B-2 of the Housing Element Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent H. The City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent I. Development shall not be approved if traffic associated with such development would create a new high accident location, or exacerbate an existing situation causing it to become a high accident location, without such development taking actions to remedy the accident situation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent J. Tot lots and recreational areas, serving children from toddler to teens, shall be a feature of all new housing developments as part of the design to accommodate households having a range of ages. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential developments located in the downtown area, and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent POST MIMI -- CASON OFFICE = METHODIST W 41,-- CHURCH = 1E11 Z MIMI W Ili .Ell MN LLi > a a MN _a, - > I I. - i . - : M N.W. 3RD ST. N.E. 3RD ST. Li MIM HMI a > Li> V g II = _ CITY o 0111. — ATTORNEY N "'= ,; — o BUILDING I z — c — M MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DRIVE N.E. 2ND ST. 0 � III — z f N $ «y1 -� �1¢'. 'li w — �` iP a W .- tall z J CITY a•;';•;•; -. 111. HALL ""•," 0 - 1111. IIIIIIIQill 111 ■III aIll N.E. 1ST ST. I. uunlni z I-- mlimiim- - Z sr moi iiim C C3 COMMUNITY w W �� z CENTER z z 111111 = t limHMI C Z a TENNIS — OLD — STADIUM SCHOOLLi Il Z SQUARE ATLANTIC AVENUE > POLICE SOUTH , Q� c COMPLEX COUNTY . COURT > > 3 7 _ x HOUSE < - MI z a LA CV '2. 4 cV • N N Li V) N -i..- 114 NE 1ST AVENUE ilitCITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL PLANNING do ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM847 LOT 13 -. .� ,y, /,e r•• ., JL :.e... ® ®' 1 Q I . `0>� `e,� BLOCK 67 `,N�\ '9 • /ee U 'o •a• (! o •s n yam®E%ISTILE RESIDENCE `9 4 it V /0l A II iF.F.EIEV.W.10 FOUND 1/2' UIND'%'CUT(-i/ 7/.'k,,,. i A tbL . .i MI w ` / IRON PIPE No I.D. • sr, ' A d N.E," , fN0 A FOUND ROD No 131,00' PLAT _::. .25 r ,IRON I.D. ' FIELD�• 'D ,T e i 1 l' !.: /,./. 0 X' �S r"i.1 5 1V cP e. / l 6 6 ,6. •-- •' 2 /0. �, 126,00 FIELD , °rye b ' w Li.i I H /2 ,— � d /1 d :,:: d /S-� LOT 1A ••4• s J ! • :46 ,11,4,,i1.. s-Is2/, 5.- ro. q BLOCK 67 • Z n /. ' .00.4t... s ' ' WLOT AREA = 9635 SQUARE FEET •Se 6 E As .' • 7 's' ' 7 'd ' • 7 / ' 7 '! k ,,P • ,•-•1 F- ./e e /e• a /s a le x a 3 ../i 0,221 ACRE +/- > ' Q Q rn "`�" `j,� �?�'•'"". v/E."tea (} ,._ y1 0•- J 0l'-+ H. 1 ,oc, 7 =3®t/d A i T A'a�' r u _1 k.. 1/4. 1.S\ �o ''1ed CONCRETE�., l� lb r'l°N l°• J 'e • ®II� O 2 . 2 . um J� ¢ ¢ _l 3.6' ... 50• if? Q ;/0 , IQ� H .k W,.d�s a ,W�'� ,�'#/, Pa o 17s' 1` 9,9' L,. L,J 1/47 a .2——2 'MI UTIUTY ROOM 4.0' K • o ONE STORY n1•b N z o LOCATION MAP. iD s.o' _„ RESIDENCE �- vi CONCRETE I (NOT TO SCALE) r F.F,ELEV.19.10 20' g WOOD STEPSd 32.3' 33.7' .. , LEGAL DESCRIPTION: p1'` . 6.4'••. ryK^� ,2 'y� 3 ,Ni LOT 14, BLOCK 67, CITY OF DELRAY BEACH (FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE l66~ ��, 126.00' ���'FIELD ``P 'O_. 5.0 I'25' FIELD "`m• 'TOWN OF LINTON), ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 3, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH r-�—/J-//—n—n—n-//=n-/J- Ji—u—N OUND'%' I - COUNTY, FLORIDA. .1L6'WOOD FENCE 1.o's SOU1 'V1 13L00'p1PLAT "'DOD ONCE 1,5't S• TN cur �, oY s1.0' bP I ET BENCH: �^ ` `�^ FOUND 1` st3 •�I X CUT ` FOUND 1/2' IORN PIPE ELEV. 16.73 IRON PIPE No I.D. • LOT 15 I No LD. co I _ UPDATED SURVEY WITH TOPO, REDRAWN IN CADD • BLOCK 67 wa ,I FIELD DATE: APRIL 6, 2005, L 735/76 SKM • �I I b BOUNDARY SURVEY w �I ri I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SKETCH SHOWN HEREON IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY MADE UNDER MY LEGEND: J APPARENT GROUND ENCROACHMENTS, UNLESS AND THAT SAID SURVEY IS TOHERWSEE AND RSHOWN AND ECT TO THE BTHAT EST OTHE SURVEY F MY EMEETS DGE N HED EMINIMUEF.UMETECHNICAHRE ARE L F.F. - FINISHED FLOOR et y. STANDARDS SET FORTH BY HE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027,' NORTH RIGHT OF WAY UNE FLORIDA STATUTES AND CHAPTER 61017-6 OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATI CODE. 1 - ELEVATION ___ i .—//— /�- WOODEN FENCE I XDATE: `///U /s- - CENTER UNE i 1. ,'";i; u _ A/ M• TUG,r REGISTERED SURVEYOR NO. 3765 N I PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON HAS NOT BEEN ABSTRACTED BY SURVEYOR FOR RIGHTS-OF-WAY,AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD;ELEVA- aa;, 1 1ST STREET TIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON N.C.V.DATUM.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED;ALL PROPERTY CORNERS ARE IRON ROD WITH CAPS, THE CENTERLINE OF N.E. 1ST STREET IS ASSUMED TO N.E 1S UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED; FOUNDATION OF EXISTING.BUILDINGS LYING BELOW SURFACE NOT LOCATED, BEARINGS AND/OR ANGLES BEAR DUE FAST. MILLER ST, - PLAT ' _ SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON RECORD PLAT OR DEED CALLS.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED,MEASUREMENTS MADE IN ACCORDANCE ' CALCULATED MEASUREMENT ",-F777 WITH UNITED STATES STANDARD.UNLESS IT BEARS THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR _ _ AND MAPPER THIS DRAWING OR SKETCH IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT VALID. PARCEL CONTROL NO. 12-43-46-16-01-067-0140. - DUE EAST ASSUMED 'D . . COPYRIGHT©2005 BY RICHARD U SHEPHARD&ASSOCIATES,INC.-All RIGHTS RESERVED LB 2102 Joe Tucker LOT 14 BLOCK 67 FOR THE BENEFIT OF; ADDRESS: `"NG'�'y ' :�,PH,13 MAP OF THE TOWN OF LINTON, FLORIDA ROGER COPE, TRUSTEE OF THE LAND TRUST 114 NORTHEAST 1ST AVENUE PLAT BOOK 1 PAGES 3 AGREEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 13, 2003 • • DELRAY BEACH, FL PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA GEORGE W. MATHEWS, HI, P.A. FLOOD ZONE "X" RICHARD L. SHEPHARD end Associates ATTORNEYS' TITLE INSURANCE FUND, INC. COMMUNITY: CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL Phone.. SCALE: 1" = 20' BY: SKM DRAWING NO. COMMUNITY PANEL NO,: 125102-0004-D 21g S.E,23RD AVENUE Boco ((561 391-4388 NORTHERN TRUST BANK MAP REVISED: JANUARY•5, 1989 P.O.BOX 759 Boynton (561)737-6546 FIELD DATE: 11/03/03 FB; 505 PG. 12 NO3-11 —086 BOYNTON BEACH,FLORIDA 33435 FAX (561)734-7548 y' .,L. jsr � _ ::,..:..1.1,::: - '� -, _ k s• � . 1.-!. . s g .: , .a s 1 s`{� - em+ i. a • • Ittl$, #• ' u n k t` ,,, -tip .. -,1,tE, t ! 4 1i w ,- 4 TV • / .. - s: ! a, t 2 - i ! — �#3: r .fir _. 3 ' - - - - - - - _ - - - ^ _ ," . 1 ,r— r. - T rs , . ' s+ t -.. " �+.A 17 'o'er .r _ ' . .- - -i,il _ ;^ 4}' 5 E' i -' "' _ ; r ! .-c e- 1- l 4h- _gr� azy `,.�"S �. a ems:' ; -ter _ �r- y- =1 r. .vfx }. �3 s r' t a „iii BBg _ _ 3 - ` _ �`.� H Kai _ M-i: s k' L ,� j b. -t; ij 1 � • F i • t , • C ~ } +r p ' } •ft� c.T t # 1 -,, , f t f Tz +1T { -( -_ 1-..t.. 1-' ..-mow r s ` Ai = s ` z'' ". cs i • f y 4 1,, - "+ w - ' a #�., 's mo .+ 9 i f► _ �+ - - `iZ. Lc s-" . .. ' `t. •zi • .{{� -._ ...- .F'..i..o. -. -? +�9.-k>ar.r�r.' c :3k. ....=;i tm'� �-a,.z f_t�:. 3.:vsr - .�;� cam: .;.:: `r•. , , , r 1 -.t - ' 'i. ✓` nr.ti'a....ro `, X: • BARKING SPACES REQUIR• ED: SITE DATA: " •,1 ,'�:> 'r'iL11i\� /4LIL.1%. ,r'r111>\ .anq.eatu�m.FwaiwaR..rraw.wcwrwa. wtOw'rw.rYraPT.O:«n/� La.l •w.I.Tl, n.w n.•wwr.•.Y. n.aN N +.w r..1 ..w+.v+r•«r r.«I r... tv.eve v.o' t'•0' 0'•0' 1'•11' e'•0' r-e' %'•0' S'•0' L'•0' 6b'.0' TOM rAw POMPOM,• rr'.cn --—- -—-—-— —-—- ' -- -' 'i ——— —- z PARKING SPACES PROVIDED: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: M RAIOAp 1141L1O/Oq,'Cm. •11'IWO Oa.MOT WACiO 1•140Cm. IVACS WOI.O.'�R�M��pOipY��IV �yyy{.00lOOIOgl1DH W , BMW 19110•64 •41 O O y��gpNCCIIOA q► YId CQ�Fti'1 Mi 1'Ia�lnR TA aa,w MOMPOS 10 WWI lIVI III' i:i:;:Ygj':;.+ ti rm.il�fAMY/ R!L /1/1 RADA �. d3t::I?I:i:.a:.•::r.£s s�sr::<" €?iit ''3:; 1'ic i:'iiivi;i €tint£:'"' iriis;i•;''a,` ......... P,.... :4ifiii:i4i4:44:iiixi£i,I?I{ax:£ .iiii{=F:S�i'i?s: r„niirili: ?[;}I{4}Ipll{}n� G Nome o*leAm*. �.•ACL J::•.E..fi•f,l. •• ii ii!Z••^••'ri iB II:I- nD memo*rAw Nisi�A�maw lrrre+luar�anrn .f••,I;•,£ iiadsli iII3Ii£IFi'liei 4dl:m•:. IIYII•'�id it;•( glitir, :,:.d,.3`;.i t:9lifi:i}i ST'i':,fi �£IiI�YiF ii '.:•{!;•:.•}im Irmo :S}i33.1 L ,rrlr .a.na..,,Tr -1- f /�` t.s,•i:lil( �. �!`Iil: #.F�t;sl;a£j i;:!}l�;F€;Il'i j��'l' �i If�i�'iy.l•=;' �, _ i; 'FZI.A IIIIIIIII=.: t,' r 31..!:4i.?c>::.'! ,,;•.I; :,IIIIIIIIII PPP' _MI PROPOSED PROJECT DATA: EXISTING PROJECT DATA: -1 .(..:o FI+=1i:}°F! 1,;I if;nT iis`:i I.11?31II'rr'i} 19111'11:: V. J'`i H / 'jI 1 11:•tAA;A:1:: i ^ii{qli?£i se;{Ieaiii ``.�/ - ,� {{ 1011111111111„ . %?il,:i.•_: !-• ROIAUNg10 M100R MU• O�MN an. .** IIlft NOYDM10011 MA. .MW aR. .wgMR 1Q I r }�tII}' II I!}i?Ik i}!st iiiii£,•I!"s'iI, 'e'riiti?ge:l �• > ♦AM ip IrAMDA OIAO• «rrM ref. .IOMgOIt IAI14L rrA LOMw. «»wan. .MgMt 1 lilt W,II�pryIII, .{,Ii.f i'i'si€;;ti. ;} MINT•: '•�•�',r p.lis•-I..s. €:i•tl;iiiiiiii'. '.iw—3: fiiiailFe{,i:F $£;}i}7}ijl. _ • �.•l OM I.VPkLV'm M.W• •0M.-.aR. «4rgNn a711MOYxo M/sa. «Lr..ar. .1M qlm V 1.i= ��11 ,�•, W1.Iwa• •aR. •MgMt •YTAaW/. «tJaR. «rNg101 S M r .'• � TOOLS •r/OW an. r..qur TOTALS• .r/CIN a R. rwq MO .. LA1 �� ',�//I _r' VIShff R. MUSHY AIO►IICI•01m WIPP)riwu• t1-- � % "//G,I �.,' ZONED: DAwDNCY.40o. «u'•r _ 1 ..r ' i ie \tri �� Y aiwrt lw rNO. .T••s• /// ! 0~4 NW Two. «W.i• ,/ 4,41<f %/�1 j'."--. MUML• MMJI00.IMAM WOW AR1O Dr11r0T /%�/ '•tv /lilts / A //� •�'• •w OnOo wv.0..a DM�.a: rwlrOOo n1OR YAM. •vv J /��' i1 j/.I .• j�j�I 1 II • V J I1ri,r i : / 1922 R. .TYKA. IIIpi %�i j //i.9...'•„I.I/ l RELOCATE I-STORY , art, N. , �' - �. % /i , RESIDENCE �C` p 1I'ilY.l 4. • RELOCAISTORY / G r �i�s iii� I�N ,•I `� __ FII II iit 111 �� i $'M�•', .. . i' ,.AwAwl.e.aAM.e41le,M1 AMA Is I,MAI leeo.l IIF'11 II 11-11 11- 11-1: 1.0 1 .•I •• AAA,I1CTI.., �,* M.AW ru,eWYMnI I 11 II-L I I y1-11 1 I u--1I II F l _ C it , ! 1 k �___ " II 1 I"II�'ll�11=11 I�1 tdra IIKII-I�1 I J b s•, , peooroa - i nI n I n_r�n�ii Inyn_:jl:i��{ a nen�n .-n.nw. CJ j i1 j / • .;j 17 i Owlw mrAe,m TV OM nw. I r-r-res• - Rwnr �7 _ d I !I / -��� j %% I MOM'm,A.uxra,.r..,n. rw Mroauu...rrncxarurw KKK z g 8� r /jj_ t/j/ % I BIKE RACK DETAIL I DISABLED SIGNAGE I r,� /S ��_- ///....... //oY�//j� ;I III wla.w'.N A1. •n,mwu A`l}11. �^ ' -I I :ill-Jf;%j/1 �� ' 1921 } • i Imo= -P%%��i8.'% / / %//i/ �1 � 2 anw rweAY +° 11 •,•�--�� ,• c / lij 4l .�.��1:� I RELOCATED 1-STORY 1 i3? JS Ty�+'11;.���I'i�v,I�///// �Ir/ A• l RESIDENCE d°f. i 1 ...nw.... �'� f Ipi1£? ` ,.4%- 1. m,anr.wnn.olr, F. tq'I 5t .Iy- �. ►�_ 1 _ _ 'I.t}�;iI I!I I���TIi� �...■ ..r iuww.,...: I _ IlI1�► „n axcwnw..,+xu ,.I. i:F,•1 jihi �rrrr '� _ _ _ ., r- ,,,. i „i:i,,,f?,„,,�,„,, .%! II .... .. —�� a ic, I3�i; ll ('`i� '�L - _,_,_ ,,. • __... a.= ear.WWI WWI r IONI'•:+.I,�, I Irll'1 ' i',il I'I II I�1 1 II— emcu,w, 1•L-,i, I i.Vaithit.,14 3i::.SSLLddii��. "^... — III III Il II,III III. I 1 111iui - - f' I .I\ NYC O•ti W. ro Iin� �E' TI f'},i1' 1 r- O. I Q E002.J 1 CAD N.No • (AID_FILE /',•� I ..pytY "71''6' 4.74..0' yA" . _ Seoe • --- - _. •- __• -- `' -- - ---- COTTAGE ENTRY ELEVATION I �4 A.. ARCHITECTURAL S,TE PLAN �•• Cl. C con•,yl,cwncn.wa idea.,......r.r.r y,,o'�' n',0. I' O�.�r..ip. ,��• � �•-y�.• .Op. 0116t O�Ir� ..,.'..�•. _ of ,-------'7----, .--7-----€--INOI\I 1-1E-A I I—�i� _>'�...�.8_....-._.+._'-..'4'_--_..i..-..Y.t'U' ' ,1 ' it 1 is Fa - N N J d —° 1` ,' Luminoire Schedule I >, 0 ' L rf LPL L^is L^>< L—14 SrL L Projects Delray Historic Preservation Board - 114 NE 1st Avenue i" u ' 14 •' L L L 1i L L L L le 14 I. Symbol Qty Label Arrangemerltumens LLF Description L Is a 1, ,1 t, L e1 l4 Is Is L is L 11 14 r 3 SA SINGLE 5900 0,750 STERNBERG 1521R-3-70MHSRTOH MTD AT 16' 1- ., co 11 <V/ OQ ARM) L L L 144�3 ., ,. Li . s. ,,. emu .L L 1, L Numeric Summary t, Projects All Projects a L ,--....... of Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min ', Site Illuminance Fc 0,96 2,4 0,3 3,20 8.00 _ 1 . SPILL Illuminance Fc 0,82 1,8 0.0 0.00 0100 - °a 3/30/2005 Cope,a32 - LE W z Z aa.. . W L CZ 1.4 ao w " N " L ( I�:�II = vv. s Ilamm••••••••••••••••••••••••••••\ramoomf I ill%1:i''''' N L i, 7 N 1, I AR I AlI�l,ll: I S ( c JI & L ON BALLAST COMPARTMENT U U - t`� NIGHTSKY ROOF OPTICS Z F 23,92---I —TYPE 3 e is of L , I !Y L TEMPERED GLASS LENS �(gs yy d �!A Is 1 i I RSa F L u 1s f �22II1 A IFS I E 1/ a 11 11 i Lyj8 g E u L 14 11 e, LJ L� V si L L 13 1I O iiir L 17 L kt o L rl 1e 14 '4---��r !- — - - 1 �ta61 1 L LL I I I I I I I I o >• iii M �i �I c_ �/ ha I D ,,oJ«,M.. 6 Mid.. 8° ,,,, 2002.30 C'i�7'LL l cAD_ME Da. WA.I.1003 Came IN, Dree16,.a PHOTOMETRIC BITE PLAN 1c+la,W.re V A D..."..D.nmra uc..1DD1 •-. ���""A% _ of =. 1 1 2 1 3 I 4 5 . b 1 / ' b , 9 I 19 , 11 -1 14 iS , 14 tts t 4', \• ! r 3 '':I n s T I I y••• DIA eee ��jj ep• d ; o ioriiuLririo arti ixoroltuD[WT 1[AC Il 73.7 IN///a Otlk�711-Il10— PH rAS .1111 2 NO.bill pp t�l® _ ;is p ap ''v i • pi z rROYttT \i, 11111 i F a4, + 1 F F ,P ,�a I "\` i Nnroae a!ro[Net! 9 rr` DCL O OUCH,I`ORIDA r WAn. 4� 4' • woo,ERR u1.or ` tj,.. i, 7 • p T^ • lii U • ��: N \ v A� 1�i � 4t� �,� � • SITE LOCATION MAP® •` .,N::\ �I a 1`N L[T C O N t t N T \\lc' M['0'CONQ[W ttMR,TM CAL D /n[IYMOVIY[NIt \ i I�///// _._.P._ ._._._. �mca DESCRIPTION ; TR,rtax Ir enr v Ttu.r I[Aa.Aeede•n Z7 H k SC ION T I N rLI IDO T,.ADP°. N / J \\ \D. v rw rukic Icfa�'uc,: 1:1 DE.THEE.I ,E-1 T R[vllloxa \ Dy\ 41 c :V Rb R \ R / SITE DRAINAGE N. —1 WII, ` ? \ Y \ \ 'i2• ..w W n. \u), DA i ga a "42,14/1/44•1•UM•'RIM n i•-•••? - *-• P Si s.,.. i •. ... z 1 \ C I i '� a ii i.' R \.sit,.\\'' '''''' 11.11 ‘. 1. 44 " It ,oyl 1I'L 1 S ] TE PLAN �t .:;(y 1.!'' 1 if.LI'•IV' ® r .O I IRrt Q NOTES I, ALL WEAR SHALL1[IN ACCORDING[WIN THE CITY Of 0[LRAY 14CN CONSIIIUCTpN STANDARDS TRIM FOR t S. iunv1vDOATAAiYinixARD L.SHEPHERD a rsaocu,tt LEGEND REVIEW L COYY[N 7 3. [LCVATIONI lamUPONuil UPON Novo . lxnnxo aAD1. 11001N0 K. CONTRACTOR TO x01,1Y 1UNSNI0C r0A 0n.10 LOCATIONS.41 HOURS WORT C01NtNOINO '� N01 FOR CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION,PHONE NUNICR 1.100 432-477o. IROPOSm DAAD[ NIRYIT • S. CONTRACTOR WALL VERIFY ALL CKn11N0 CONDITIONS AND N0111T ENGINEER 01 ANY CONSTRUCT,. i DISCR[P.WCY WTM DRAWING OATA.` COMM NIU}T IINC,T1I ecru mot'W,Y�� • Y /. NNOP DRAWINGS 01 ALL NEURAL StINO USED SHALL It 1U/YRn0 TO IN[tx*N[[II Y f0R REVIEW PRIOR 10 CONY[NCO10 CONSTRUCTION. PROPOSED UTILITY UN[,Mt NOTED], CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER M HOOTS PRIOR 10 COWfNC[Y[Nf 01 WORK mR ISSUE OATS L/It/D! A PR[-0001110CPON YC[[TIHO. 01ALCITON Or t010ACt RUNO/f —,,.--•7' I. NE CONTRACTOR SNAIL PROVIDE TRARIC CONTROL NACU.WORK EOM IN ACCOAWNCE WIN Ca CE41L[110N OIC0NSTRUCLION,D100 1110 1X LL'It RESTORED TO PRIOR OR5INAL CONDITIONS, PROPERTY UK •—'--'--'- WAIN INCCI won T0. SEE ARCNIT[CYI 1N[PLAN 1'0R LAYOUT DIY(N11oN1,D0 N0T suit DRAW11401, • /IS 1 41 2 • _,..._......_ _ � �. _. %f/ �� , e V M Y rV .. V V IJYy, I ww mom I.aa :- • � r� r- rvr r� a tIwN � .�T1. I `Il )( /� , _`S �,... rar .. _11 c'w, trill M. as I r kin.IIlirillli I ! _1_ MINA tw.+:n+a+N rw,.... a. I� IfWe L fre'•'I. MILI'��� N A.ROM, I OWN, •.. I. x INY MOON VM.; a�'T i�)O. •w DMI CAT(YIt1[M nH 11 al 4 MANr19. DNu uuxlt a nl r °MR INLET Norzs �.v, • war-- " r—vaL a... ...Ar�wNw• — :w..^.�•i.�r_w r�• r I1 o r E c r T ..snw.•y .,r.w r' ..T:,.•r' ��{L�j y II ILO OW EOLLI AVOW 'I It1IIlg"Yt.f.."41._➢ w •la_ 7 q u.N.[.UN,ILORIDA AVOW( • •,,,>,,,,,•, HOC.NILL KNEE TYPICAL WATER SERVICE CONNECTION• REDUCED PRESSURE ZONE 9ACKFLOW PREVENTER • TYPICAL PUT lPTAATIOR TAME Sul.? c0NTCNT '.l CONSTRUCT!.COALD lA.m Lou w, al r..ILO. i' rAlO AN ri NrrAu ri ,., IA>c To.r sMw ,ga,%,m 'a"$.' '". A tY1I lONe .•.'I''I'i";'1'g Ar,°"'�..Ar MI iorA - "mum TMW,fAM, ,eP�iw •t: w.a mat MIT WO.'M:•. Nl WII MD+I Mal ens. Mrm1-alVya�wolaeNl 6FviRIPEOATtA'1�01 ANn al • �TOw Mrarn Nom .IxrnmNT l�axlb,TMwu r%AD .7 n .10OZ a ' r L..L.0.4010 nrr•q TO Mw°`IA.101t MD IOC •1K Wu[°rt° 0r�M,E.a.�%. m.12 LvMNN Al rW MAIA At IA.NT.N 1.111 a iw711A/(1071�rIZT rp1 PAVEMENT JOINT PAVER BRICK SECTOR OUTSIDE OF RIGHT OF WAY CURB AND GUTTER SECTIONS NNocV MI(1rh , Kda eot0I ii .tArt MP AI Ra. I Ir.u. I ,p �,CaT AEI iT../.1. •LA II cIL of Ir I I • T3.4 �;!� .1� (11'1N1A tiia'S,'+i� \\ 1riti wwr, .. �. I I°�'r.o Kui M t 1.'f0 mN6 „'DO 1YlW1W``N- . .a • -I Fur UI . -O.,. � � . ..INar r.r.w m • w aNaT rHa r r[ t NAV > •IL, t. ! D A T E "S N +n a Le.,YNt N1Y naT•A' OWW AINTI ISSUED lOL SIYYtP CICUT? lIr C VCVIEW!COM0ENre �GL�?IaSl 'u1 B L Cr Luw u pN r.,.,1 m. f.-�2� .Nwe ANT plppBpy T„Ayr 0 lAOWo �'yAjri : ���■ pp�� !'$ SUM. ,.ICT 4 • P4,q,r 0 NOT raq CONOTAucno. �IC.'lo4{t ilk P.t', 4,';.y:. xwafi> IY II>NYI a A.MG Ate a 4rIOR UM H r I N� w C TO W. AM O EdV11 �].ti^'>•n ©L+�`->II�S.;i[� Mat.Nn O CON1111UCtI0H awn 1u,,s,^. p yp WO Iua1.4.1 n.....) °q,�01°Ar'',� 0 .E:":s;N•I- ® I',/Y:+a MS NORI •wx rw Ns.Wuia,.wAxm WI A•2.144�ROO 17N4 OF"fix .osart°Now w>.•A r lure r roc AAIN W[0 WI.Al.MIA LaLiA 13fUL CAA 1I/Ot/Ol TYPICAL PARKING SPACES DETAIL RT 4,2 L..a.1 Id NA M.�u.I",t=M.AA.wlonwn SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION TYPICAL CLEANOL)T DETAIL WW 5.1 ran SKIT NUMBER . SEWER SERVICE CONNECTIONS DETAIL WW 4,1 III 2 el 2 -7-7 • t C I • + C+ +) PLANTING NOTES: " I Rnw .wr ... pYwu....°wi..A.pW.4M1..lk..w. • —NERAL j .1=g4.wr Ilr g•No+rlNa I ;i, . .. .."I....o,...-0,.....,.,.N�. • �NDSCRPING f, I • y 1(p� G/�') y1�� I 4A..1 Aww1I........r.....N�w. LAN SCAPE ACONIT O O y, 71'TJ I ALL-EY _ _ LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION r EXISTING TREE KEY ! "".."N"A"" w""'..' TREE-TYPE—:ACTIOt. boa..gl.•••10.Nagy.•. ; 4 i GASIA', pP.:% 18."OqL Yp/!DE B do REMAIN l J ' l✓il at Marti N. ....ur.pr...vLrwp+.n..N. . +'z UNIDLNTIFIED��'tAL DAIS 1-IK6 1u .Aw"••• OVEKNE�D OIfI ITY I/18E5-+.�N. _ ..p.pw...N..N..r» • I iTPEE is REMAIN.sM:TNl1ttf •• Ti. MN...Np...4 v”1...w.iM p..A.l. i II 3 SLASH PINE IA HI of A BED of a W'PALMETTO•• i b 1 TO BE' REMOVED TO ALLOY H0U5: TO BE MOVED IlL�L,/' 1 0 ii il AO • .0V.., •w'N ""'"pa+'N"w•pw 1S IZ • I �,• ILF. MbMNM1.,MM I MM.N.MN dH T SITE I I LO I I I.......walrlpw *4P4» peN.[,TI.1 EIn.1OCA pATON ILDRIDI JJ.1)a4 &OMARGKV;GREEN B'OA REh10VEP j j d'0! 21 Alik I LI p"",a"" '° °"°" """ " feed 11._J ee "5 5 rnRfAu�r:elor •RSmBIwEg r. :; � � �1jj1�� M: �7 MN..N Np.....N.w.....:a N.1..„.. . g r _,� •o ¢O Ex71N4 TREE 1`1 TO REMAIKV71J wt�.'— /r��jlg p... • ---- iA EXTINTRE2r0 REMAIN f �f! tl �..� tiA�:.:(�� / '�'��- r�+�'w•..+ �•� ♦rill♦;tr0 ;• .�� 4l :rgal{ FAnSS• • • f;111/ `III11" I, AM ! 2 w.7...44.4`.+;Nti'.7.44,..4'.'..`« F APPROxIMATELy 50'WESTAI �I _j^* \ ' sr . • ++9PNOEryIxVARIETy•b''{I7.;WEAK•TRE�:POMOVE III I II � + • • MUY ..nY4MMM.wN.NYwYIA.wry • TI� .] .n. — • • Ar. \I��I 'I I�k amulw1.011.1 g • • ®I.1 / \ �Y-Y- •. 1mkNllelISRICNMl.pN.eM IN tl Y, I, i, I.® C! I • MkIAIIV INN M� • 1 Zs' OtNAY ACH. t e1 VI_.. �Ate.. ..- ..,�.... y IDb11,AW140.1 1 !MNe. ,Ii • ice/ TVN.MVIML kNmll • rAri. In V . 1 -• IZ}f� l+.N►_`+ 1 �I�ill�J[ Yr� .r/��' ckP Ndknns°m.� 1 WIn t! � 'i,: '� �,rvitink • :�' um tlltMNOlplitlIARN11NIwp usOR I C • u:Ir..s 11 {° 'av RIXNpIWep11N1°.0140MNYN°b IMG •.w r Nifg .. it .N ma I.AMIIMY • waalµa1 M'I.tl IMI.e ;I • • if / �.'r I 11�� I• I �. ! • A muw• nN°n..'°'N°.. • ',.14°m EE • Ie R�njRIN •.I. 1 ®' rolk NMw.. N..P.mmwl.A . n V ao�• • • • '; III �M T• \t. DPORCH r�r I�—=...�����IIja■11��` ,�I r>AT Lrer • . Z 11 ♦....iwi.Ml• la. .m 1ev ticivrnno a—.CweiNlw.^-OTl /M F■ �p �` ' I ` III A. �/ , CLv pWl _......11PIN.W 1 ID,P MB g' f TI 1r+1 ' :•`��i•��•—• •a:II�----� _ •�� •ODODhaOiNNY.— Uni M.lgp(bGINM_, of OW DTvnasvCO1.Ic b • �j 1: �_ir.• .y��! ' • /AP n11 W,.......-JIp...rkpTl.--_e 10ar.V CT • DII <yR r a _-F' I e�fr �r--. L_'..► .:'.lit • • oAc gams hl.r—_u..Or 7 1!�[IPWI .1/&t 1'O" 4/12/Os 6' • �Y� nil • • .,id l eP 040 patrono...._......Whim L111.+lrw • 1 g^- 88 �1 ! _ ono W.WM bore—..tlyolm2l—.—.1 le[PMwuna g 1, �E'�• I GRASS • 11a u.mdlx..W._...,-.-rrW.nwefrM.er-1 Pr. prove • �I ' ", t i 4aAss •xl a'Haley •. 6 WWO.a141MMers4 -..�o�d1.UW'Mrl..1.r. n1.11eP'1L' .1 C,O• CAP Nbm.1119Nm-,... CsWw a JrKr.o PLAN 1� • ••. . ' ;1, ,So SPK COT co w..ywl.. 006.9l.r1.•—.0 a ' no ►s.N11A...1—.v.Wrao n n11ro1.NarN • ' tly s3 EIY.E fat Maw.11..a.....-.,.1.r.o n.1••_- a naNA ePM. ; _ u.e 'ms.rolr op.Ta.wmn,v-11 nwaindr. , . r IA,:1ev glrlY.W*Alain,0.1.1nmM 1.J 1•Y nIVIVI UV OO IOeooty.somploiH.-N./w.p.lkp IeeID•!.ir.e �': ICI®Irow10410•0le.lYwl..—.Il��mwowaN..�r�...wx H.«rA /4 �:' • fl) voaNbw•vhM.a u.u'ay�'N-m n1': ..lu.e.�,o NO mamas D • %N 'ypeya 7(veu 10,nll'rp. CLINT/O55/LPp 104 �7 I. .u.L L_1 NORTHEAST 1 ST AVENUE . />, HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: June 15, 2005 AGENDA ITEM: IV.C. ITEM: 145 North Swinton Avenue (Mako Technologies) — Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness, Class V site plan, landscape plan, design elements, and demolition request for an addition to a contributing building within the Old School Square Historic District. TRINITY • LUTHERAN t+l LAKE ' I D A ROAD N.E. ant sr.- GENERAL DATA: _ POST CASON OFFICE • — METHODIST — CHURCH Owner Mako Technologies = . Agent/Applicant Jeffrey Silberstein Location 145 North Swinton Avenue — - w Property Size 0.23 Acres Z Future Land Use Map Other Mixed Use (OMU) — La. Current Zoning Old School Square Historic Arts "'" D ST , "E- S� District (OSSHAD) Q Adjacent Zoning North: OSSHAD • South: OSSHAD East: OSSHAD ATTORNEY West: OSSHAD BUILDING —— Existing Land Use Single-Family Dwelling YAR➢N whfER KING JR.DRIVE • N.E.^2ND Sr. Proposed Land Use Office 0 Water Service Existing on site Sewer Service Existing on site — 3 z CITY — HALL N W.1ST ST. N E. 1ST ST. z z COMMUNITY CEN TER • TENNIS OLD STADIUM SCHOOL SQUARE ATLANTIC AVENUE SOUTH - ` (AUNTY I IIII 1111 1111":r ' 1 COURT . = HOUSE 'a ME IM NM r S.W. IST SI. S.E. 151 Si. 3 IV.C. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is the approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness that incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for 145 North Swinton Avenue (Mako Technologies), pursuant to Land Development Regulations (LDR) Section 2.4.5(F): O Demolition of the accessory garage; O Class V Site Plan; O Landscape Plan; and O Design Elements The subject property is located at the southeast corner of North Swinton Avenue and NE 2nd Street. }BACKGROUND ,? The 0.23 acre property is zoned Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD) and contains a 1,153 square foot single-family dwelling and an accessory 381 square foot garage constructed in 1939 in the Minimal Traditional style. The subject property is considered a contributing property within the Old School Square Historic District as the extant structures are associated with the developmental history and exhibit the architectural elements of the Old School Square area during the 1930's. At its meeting of June 21, 2000, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) approved renovations to the extant single-family dwelling and accessory garage consisting of the following: El Removal of aluminum siding and repair of the original horizontal clapboard siding; El Replacement of the existing glass jalousie windows on the front and rear porches with single pane, impact resistant glass; O Reproduction of the original operable wood batten and board shutters; O Installation of a new dimensional composition shingle roof; and El Repainting of the building exteriors (pale yellow/moss green). The above renovations along with other minor modifications to the site including the removal of an Australian Pine from the northwest corner of site and the installation of a wood picket fence have been completed. At its meeting of December 15, 2004, the HPB denied approval for a Certificate of Appropriateness in association with a Class V site plan application for the demolition of the extant contributing single-family dwelling and accessory garage, and the construction of a three- story, mixed-use (office and residential) building. The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness in association with a Class V site plan application for the demolition of the extant accessory garage, and the construction of a one and two-story addition to the extant historic building for office use, which is now before the Board for action. PROJECT DESCRIPTION. The development proposal includes the following: O Demolition of the extant accessory garage; Meeting Date:June 15,2005 Agenda Item: IV.C. 145 North Swinton Avenue (Mako Technologies) - Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements and Demolition Request Page 2 O Construction of a one and two-story addition to the 1,153 square foot extant historic building. The first floor of the addition will measure 1,163 square feet and the second floor will measure 583 square feet. On completion, the entire structure will be used as offices; O Construction of a seven (7) space back-out parking lot at the rear (east) of the property with access from the adjacent alley (including 1 compact and 1 handicapped accessible space), two (2) employee parking compact spaces to the front (west) of the property, and two (2) right-of-way spaces on NE 2nd Street; O Associated landscaping; and, O A waiver request to reduce the required width of the south terminal landscape island at the rear car parking area, and to allow parking in the front/side yard., SITE PLAN ANALYSIS COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall be specifically addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. LDR Section 4.3.4(K) Development Standards Matrix: The following table indicates that the proposal meets and/or exceeds the requirements of LDR Section 4.3.4(K) as it pertains to the OSSHAD zoning district: Standard Provided Building Height(max.): Two-Story 35' 22'-3/8" One-Story 35' 11' Building Setbacks (min.): Front 25' 29'-11" Side Street 15' 15'-9" Side Interior 7'-6" 7'-6" Rear 10' 29'-6" Open Space: 25% 41% LDR Section 4.4.24—Old School Square Historic Arts District: Supplemental District Regulations: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(4)(a), all non-residential uses, with the exception of restaurants, shall provide one parking space per 300 square feet of total new or existing floor area being converted to non-residential use. The current development proposal consists of 2,899 square feet of office floor area (first and second floors), therefore, based upon the above, ten (10) parking spaces are required. The development proposal provides for nine (9) on-site spaces. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(5), if it is impossible or inappropriate to provide required parking on-site or off-site, pursuant to Section 4.6.9(E)(4), the in-lieu fee option provided in Section 4.6.9(E)(3) may be collected. The proposal therefore includes the purchase of one (1) in-lieu parking space. While the required parking can be met, it is noted that 15 separate offices are proposed. With one occupant per office, a potential parking demand would be 15 spaces 145 North Swinton Avenue (Mako Technologies) - Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements and Demolition Request Page 3 while 9 are provided. Consideration should be given to enlarging some of the offices to reduce the potential parking impact. Waiver Analysis: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(3), all parking, except for single family homes and duplexes, shall be located in the side or rear yard or adjacent to a rear alley. No such parking shall be located in the area between any street and the closest building or structure. Where there are existing buildings or structures, the Historic Preservation Board may waive this requirement during the site plan review process, provided that it is determined that compliance is not feasible and that the character of the area will be maintained. If approved, such parking shall be substantially screened from off-premises view by a hedge or decorative fencing. The applicant proposes two employee parking spaces to the front of the property which do not conform with this section of the LDRs therefore a waiver request has been requested. Required Finding: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(8)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the approving body shall make a finding that the granting of the waiver: (a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; (b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; (c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; or, (d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. Parking to the front of the extant building and purchasing one (1) in-lieu space is the only viable option to meet the parking requirement for this development. There is no space to add additional parking at the alley to the rear of the property and there is no suitable space to install any parking which could be accessed from NE 2" Street. The utilization of a new brick circular driveway will not negatively impact the residential character of the property and this has been utilized within the OSSHAD for other properties converted from a single family home to an office. Further, the circular driveway will provide turning space for cars exiting these parking spaces which will allow them to leave the property in a forward motion as opposed to backing-out onto North Swinton Avenue. Support for the waiver will not be considered a special privilege to the applicant as others have been permitted to do so within the OSSHAD; it will neither negatively affect the neighboring area nor diminish public facilities and parking in front of the building will not cause an unsafe situation (as vehicles can exit in a forward manner). Therefore, the waiver request can be supported based on the criteria listed above. The proposed employee parking spaces to the front (west) of the property are shown to have a depth of 16'. Consideration should be given to increasing their depth to 18' by adding 2' to the east to provide further maneuvering space. LDR Article 4.6—Supplemental District Regulations: Walls, Fences, and Hedges: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.5(C), walls, fences, or hedges located in a required front yard or street side yard shall not exceed six feet(6') in height. It is noted that where required, alterations 145 North Swinton Avenue (Mako Technologies) - Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements and Demolition Request Page 4 may be carried out to the existing picket fence. If the fence is to be altered, details and specifications must be submitted. Lighting: A photometric plan detailing all the proposed site lighting has not been submitted with the application. A photometric plan which conforms to the requirements of LDR Section 4.6.8 must be submitted. Further, spun concrete lighting poles are to be provided on Swinton Avenue and NE 2"d Street. These requirements have been attached as conditions of approval. Bicycle Parking: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(C)(1)(c)(3), bicycle parking facilities shall be provided at any non-residential use within the City's Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) which, through the development review process, is determined to generate a demand. In addition, Transportation Element Policy D-2.2 of the City's Comprehensive Plan requires bicycle facilities on all new development and redevelopment with particular emphasis on development within the TCEA. The development proposal has included a bicycle parking facility (bike rack) at the northeast corner of the proposed addition adjacent to the rear parking area. Sidewalks: Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.3(B) (1), a 5' wide sidewalk is required within the rights-of-way adjacent to the property. A five foot (5') wide concrete sidewalk currently exists along NE 2nd Street between North Swinton Avenue and the adjacent alley; however previous approvals on the adjacent properties to the east (Pineapple Podiatry and Ascot) have replaced the concrete sidewalk with a new paver brick sidewalk. It is appropriate that this development proposal do the same therefore a five foot (5') wide, brick paver sidewalk for NE 2"d Street is shown on the plans. While the sidewalks along NE 2"d Street are being converted over to paver brick sidewalks presently, the sidewalks along North Swinton Avenue have yet to begin such a transition. However, the City Engineer has indicated that the replacement of the sidewalks along that portion of North Swinton Avenue, between Atlantic Avenue and NE 1st Street is presently under consideration and potentially could be expanded further north up to NE 2"d Street. Therefore, the plans show that the existing concrete sidewalk along North Swinton Avenue is-to be replaced with a five foot (5') wide paver brick sidewalk. This is subject to the approval of the City Engineer. OTHER ITEMS: Dedication of Right-of-Way Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.1(D)(2), the required width of an alley is 20' or the existing dominant width. Further, pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.1(D)(3), additional right-of-way width may be required to promote public safety and welfare; to provide for storm water management; to provide adequate area for street trees; and to ensure adequate access, circulation and parking in high intensity use areas. Such a determination shall be advanced by a recommendation from the City Engineer. The authority for requiring such additional right-of-way shall rest with the body having the approval authority of the associated development application. 145 North Swinton Avenue (Mako Technologies) - Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements and Demolition Request Page 5 The abutting alley to the east currently has a dedicated right-of-way width of 16'. The development proposal will utilize the adjacent alley for access and circulation. The City Engineer and DSMG have determined that the width of the alley should be expanded to a width of 20', which is consistent with the width that has been provided with recent redevelopment proposals. It is therefore attached as a condition of approval that a two foot (2') right-of-way dedication is made for the alley prior to issuance of a building permit. Alley Improvement Obligation: Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.2(A) (2) (a), when access to a project is provided from a local street and/or alley, then the project must provide appropriate traffic lanes meeting requirements of LDR Section 5.3.1(C) in order to provide continuous paved access from the nearest paved street or alley to the project in addition to the improvements on its side of the centerline of the right-of-way. The development proposal requires that the alley to the rear(east) of the property is paved to its full width adjacent to the subject property. This is attached as a condition of approval. Undergrounding of Utilities: Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.8, utility facilities serving the development shall be located underground throughout the development. Therefore, it is attached as a condition of approval that all existing and proposed utilities associated with the development must be located underground and that a note be provided on the site plan to this effect. Site Plan and Engineering Technical Items: While revised plans have accommodated most of staffs concerns, the following items remain outstanding and will need to be addressed prior to building permit submittal: 1. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.3(F) (4), provide a composite utility plan that shows the location of all existing and proposed utilities (water, sewer, power, telephone, gas, cable, and drainage). The composite plan shall be signed by a representative of each utility provider attesting to the fact that services can be accommodated as shown on the composite utility plan. The composite plan shall address the responsibility for relocation of existing services and installation of new services; 2. Provide a typical cross section from building to adjacent right-of-way or adjacent property at all property lines. Pay particular attention to grade differential from proposed site to existing adjacent properties and show the existing grades on adjacent property; 3. Provide six inch (6") deep sodded swale adjacent to all roadway pavement within the public rights-of-way. Indicate swale on engineering plans; 4. Indicate on the engineering plans how the roof drainage is accommodated; 5. Indicate stop bars and signs at egress drives as well as providing interior traffic control markings and signage. Clearly indicate onsite traffic control; 6. Provide note that water meter sizes are to be determined by the City of Delray Beach Utility Department upon building permit application and remove the size indicated on the engineering plans. An RPZ backflow preventor will be required on the water service. Provide standard City RPZ backflow preventor detail on plans. Also, indicate location of irrigation water meters; 145 North Swinton Avenue (Mako Technologies) - Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements and Demolition Request Page 6 7. Provide current City of Delray Beach standard construction details on the plans as applicable. 8. Curbing is not required adjacent to the alley and should be eliminated. 9. Provide two copies of a Pollution Prevention Plan. Prior to and during construction of all sites, the permitee shall implement and maintain all erosion and sediment control measures included in the required Pollution Prevention Plan. For projects over one (1) acre in size, provide a copy of FDEP Notice of Intent. 10. Site is required to retain 5 year 1 hour storm (3.2") in addition to meeting water quality criteria (1"). Provide signed and sealed drainage calculations and indicate how storm water will be retained on site. 11. Provide certified exfiltration trench test results. 12. Clearly dimension driveway width. Maximum width of driveway is 24 feet. 13. Clearly indicate on plans the limits of all curbing. 14. Provide note that water meter sizes are to be determined by the City of Delray Beach Utility Department upon building permit application and remove the size indicated on the engineering plans. 15.A RPZ backflow preventor will be required on the water service. Provide standard city RPZ backflow preventor detail on plans. Can existing water service be used? 16. Indicate location of existing sewer service. New service may not be required. If new service is required, a clean out should be located at property line. 17. Existing water meter is on N Swinton Ave side of property. If possible, utilize this meter instead of cutting across NE 2nd St to install new meter. 18. Engineer of record is to field verify location, size and depth of existing City of Delray Beach utilities prior to submitting Final Engineering Plans. 19. Provide on the plans current City of Delray Beach standard construction details as applicable. 20. Indicate location of irrigation water meters (east of 1-95 only). 21.A 20' miter dedication is required at NW corner of Swinton and NE 21'd Street. 22.A 2' dedication is required along north-south alley. 23. Only "F" curb shall be used in the right of way. 24. Show FDOT Index 304 handicap ramps. 25. Crosswalks shall be coordinated with City Project 2001-054, (Mathews Consulting, ph: 561-478-7961). 145 North Swinton Avenue (Mako Technologies) - Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements and Demolition Request Page 7 26. Consideration should be given to enlarging some of the offices to reduce the potential parking impact. LANDSCAPE PLAN ANALYSIS The proposed landscape plan consists of six (6) Gumbo Limbo Trees along the north property line and three (3) Japanese Fern Trees in the swale to the north of the property. There are four (4) Coconut Palms at the northwest corner of the property. Within the landscape island at the circular driveway to the west of the property are two (2) Gumbo Limbo Trees underplanted with Bush Allamanda, Purple Crinum Lily, Hibiscus Standard, and Wax Jasmine. The south property boundary line contains two (2) Gumbo Limbo Trees, a Ligustrum Tree, and Seagrape hedging along the full property line which screens the NC units and dumpsters. The landscape island to the north of the rear parking area contains underplanting of Redtip Cocoplum and Wax Jasmine. The foundation planting around the structure includes Redtip Cocoplum, Hibiscus Standard, Alexander Palms, Wart Fern, Trinette, and Arboricola. Adjacent to the west façade of the structure are four (4) Coconut Palms. The three planters within the proposed central courtyard of the development include Wart Fern and Foxtail Palms. Pursuant to LDR. Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d), a landscape strip of not less than 5' in width, excluding curbing, shall be located between the off-street parking area or other vehicular use area and abutting properties. The landscape barrier shall consist of a hedge (24" height x 24" o.c.) and at least one (1)tree for every thirty feet or fraction thereof. This landscape barrier shall be located between the common lot line and the off-street parking area in a planting strip of not less than five (5) feet in width. None of this has been provided along the south perimeter of the back-out parking row adjacent to the alley. A waiver to this requirement has been requested. Waiver Analysis: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d), a landscape strip of not less than five (5) feet in width, excluding the curbing, shall be located between the vehicular use area and abutting properties. The proposal includes a request for a waiver to omit the required landscape strip to the south of the rear parking area to accommodate the construction of the seven space parking lot adjacent to the alley. Required Findings: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(8)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the granting body shall make findings that the granting of the waiver: a) Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; b) Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; and, d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. Given the site constraints, the waiver is necessary to accommodate a rear parking lot with alley access. It would be possible to reduce the width of the landscape strip to the north of the rear parking area and create a landscape strip to the south. However, the landscape strip to the north contributes to the available stacking distance for cars exiting onto NE 2nd Street and screens the parking area from the public right-of-way. 145 North Swinton Avenue (Mako Technologies) - Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements and Demolition Request Page 8 Given the analysis above, the waiver request will neither adversely affect the neighboring area nor grant a special privilege to the property owner based on the current configuration and lot area, and no public facilities will be at risk. There is some concern; however, that an unsafe situation could be formed because of the six foot (6') high wall adjacent to the southernmost parking bay as visibility along the alley will be impaired. A condition of approval is therefore that the proposed wall is eliminated from the proposal. Based on this analysis, positive findings can be made to grant the requested waiver pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), subject to the above condition. Landscape Plan Technical Items: The following item remains outstanding and must be addressed prior to building permit submittal: 1) Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(a), a hedge, wall or other durable landscape area shall be placed along the interior perimeter of the landscape strip that separates the vehicular use area from the adjacent right-of-way. The picket fence and Bush Allamanda are proposed along the front property line rather than the interior perimeter of the landscaped area. The picket fence and Bush Allamanda should be relocated. 2) Site lighting and all utilities shall be shown on the landscape plan to avoid any conflicts. Based upon the above referenced conditions of approval being addressed, positive findings can be made with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16. DESIGN ELEMENTS ANALYSIS . LDR Section 2.4.6(H)—Certificate of Appropriateness: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H)(5), the Board must make a finding that any Certificate of Appropriateness which is to be approved is consistent with Historic Preservation purposes pursuant to Objective A-4 of the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and specifically with the provisions of LDR Section 4.5.1. Future Land Use Element Objective A-4: The redevelopment of land and buildings shall provide for the preservation of historic resources. The objective shall be met through continued adherence to the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance and the following policies: Future Land Use Element Policy A-4.1: Prior to approval or recommending approval of any land use or development application for property located within a historic district or designated as a historic site, the Historic Preservation Board must make a finding that the requested action is consistent with the provisions of Section 4.5.1 of the Land Development Regulations relating to historic sites and districts and the "Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" Development Standards LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(7), provide guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The applicable standards are as follows: (E) (4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. 145 North Swinton Avenue (Mako Technologies) - Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements and Demolition Request Page 9 (E) (7) The construction of new buildings or structures, or the relocation, alteration, reconstruction, or major repair or maintenance of a non-contributing building or structure within a designated historic district shall meet the same compatibility standards as any material change in the exterior appearance of an existing non-contributing building. Any material change in the exterior appearance if any existing non-contributing building, structure, or appurtenance in a designated historic district shall be generally compatible with the form, proportion, mass, configuration, building material, texture, color, and location of historic buildings, structures, or sites adjoining or reasonably approximate to the non-contributing building, structure, or site. In addition, LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8) states that all improvements to buildings, structures and appurtenances within a historic district shall be visually compatible and that visual compatibility shall be determined upon criteria (a) through (k). The criteria applicable to the development proposal are as follows: (a) Height: The height of proposed buildings or modifications shall be visually compatible in comparison or relation to the height of existing structures and buildings. (c) Proportion of Openings (Windows and Doors): The openings of any building within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the openings exemplified by the prevailing historic architectural styles within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors to the height of windows and doors among buildings within the district shall be visually compatible. (d) Rhythm of Solids to Voids; Front Facades: The relationship of solids to voids in the front façade of a building or structure will be visually compatible with the front façades of historic buildings or structures within the district. (f) Rhythm of Entrance and/or Porch Projections: The relationship of entrances and porch projections to the sidewalks of a building shall be visually compatible with the prevalent architectural styles of entrances and porch projections on historic sites, buildings, or structures within a historic district. (h) Roof Shapes: The roof shape of a building or structure shall be visually compatible with the roof shape of a historic site, building, or structure within a historic district. (j) Scale of a Building: The size of a building, the building mass in relation to open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, and porches shall be visually compatible with the building size and building mass of historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation recommend that: New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property. The Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines include the following with regard to new construction/infill development: All new construction should compliment the historic architecture of the district. The relationship of that new construction adjacent to the significant historic resources can either enhance or detract from the historic setting of the district. 145 North Swinton Avenue (Mako Technologies) - Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements and Demolition Request Page 10 Recommended Approaches to New Construction: O The height of any new buildings should be similar to those of other buildings along the streetscape. O The new construction shall be compatible with the width of the surrounding buildings. D Roof forms and pitch should be compatible with the surrounding buildings. O Windows types and patterns, as well as their general placement, should be similar to surrounding buildings. O The orientation of the main elevation to the street should be respected. O The character of the massing should be compatible with the surrounding buildings. Massing means the geometric relationship of the building's component parts. O Streetscape elements such as the division between stories, porch heights, and the alignment of windows and windowsills should be extended to the new construction. Analysis: The applicant is proposing an addition to the extant historic structure which will comprise of 1,163 square feet being added to the first floor and 583 square feet being added at second floor level. The first floor addition will attach to the rear (east) facade of the extant historic structure and will be constructed to form three sides of a central courtyard with the historic structure forming the fourth side. The two-story section will be confined to the addition at the rear (east) of the property that faces onto the rear parking area and will have a balcony area facing onto the courtyard. On completion, the entire structure will be used as offices. The extant historic structure is constructed of wood siding with a brick chimney to the north elevation and a porch with a sloping roof to the west elevation. The majority of the windows are of 6 over 6 light configuration and have decorative wooden shutters, and the roof is pitched. The dwelling is in the Minimal Traditional style. The proposed addition has been designed to work in harmony with the extant historic structure without attempting to copy the original design. The addition is of a traditional style, the roofs have been given the same pitch as the historic structure, and a balcony with picket rails of a similar design to the porch has been added to the two-story section. The addition can; however, be differentiated from the historic structure as, firstly, the external walls are constructed of hardiboard siding (with a profile to match the wood siding on the historic structure) and white brick (to match the historic chimney). Secondly, The windows on the proposed addition will be given larger lights than those on the historic structure and will consist of either four or eight light frames. Thirdly, the historic dwelling has wood shutters and the addition has no shutters as impact resistant glass is being installed. Further differentiation can be made between the historic structure and the new addition through the use of differing, yet complementary, paint schemes. The historic structure will be painted yellow with a white trim and green shutters and the addition will be painted all white. However, there is no guarantee that this paint color scheme will continue to be used in the . future. While the majority of the proposed addition is of one-story, the proposed two-story section is to the rear of the historic structure and does not dominate the extant dwelling. The proposed addition is compatible with the historic structure in terms of height, proportion of openings, rhythm of solids to voids, roof shape, and scale. It is proposed to roof both the historic structure and the new addition with a silver, standing seam metal roof. The historic dwelling currently has a gray shingle roof, therefore, it is a condition of approval that the historic roof covering is retained and repaired where • 145 North Swinton Avenue (Mako Technologies) - Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements and Demolition Request Page 11 necessary as this will avoid the unnecessary removal of historic fabric and, given this condition, it will further differentiate the original dwelling from the addition. The proposed addition is also in keeping with the other buildings along the North Swinton Avenue streetscape. The structures to the south (the balance of Block 67) are all one-story structures and the structures along the adjoining block to the north (Block 66) are predominantly one-story in height. It is noted that two-story structures do exist along the western streetscape of North Swinton Avenue; in fact, two such structures exist directly across the street from the subject property. Accordingly, the proposed addition will be in keeping with the Design Guidelines and will be consistent with LDR Section 4.5.1(E). DEMOLITION FINDINGS • As previously noted, the demolition of the extant contributing garage is proposed as part of this development proposal. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(F)(1), the HPB shall consider the following guidelines in evaluating applications for a COA for demolition of historic buildings or structures within designated historic districts: (a) Whether the structure is of such interest or quality that it would reasonably fulfill the criteria for designation for listing in the National Register. (b) Whether the structure is of such design, craftsmanship, or material that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty or economically nonviable expense. (c) Whether the structure is one of the last remaining examples of its kind in the designated historic district within the city. (d) Whether retaining the structure would promote the general welfare of the city by providing an opportunity to study local history, architecture, and design, or by developing an understanding of the importance and value of a particular culture and heritage. (e) Whether there are definite plans for immediate reuse of the property if the proposed demolition is carried out, and what effect those plans will have on the character of the surrounding area. Any demolition of a contributing structure is a regrettable, irreversible situation that erodes the very fabric of the historic district. In this instance the structure to be demolished is a highly visible contributing garage that was constructed in 1939 in the Minimal Traditional style. The structure is in good condition and was recently renovated in 1999. It is noted that the structure would not fulfill the criteria for individual listing in the National Register and that there are plans for the immediate reuse of the property following demolition. It must also be taken into consideration that the applicant has included the extant historic dwelling in the development proposal and will be adapting it for an appropriate and sustainable new use which will retain its external appearance and ensure its future maintenance. However, there are still concerns with regard to the loss of a historic structure. If the demolition is granted therefore, it is a condition of approval that the demolition of the garage is delayed for up to 3 months for the applicant or the agent to attempt to find an alternative and appropriate new site for its relocation. REQUIRED FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1, prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be 145 North Swinton Avenue (Mako Technologies) - Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements and Demolition Request Page 12 achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body, which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to consistency with the Future Land Use Map, Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency, and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations. LDR Section 3.1.1(A) - Future Land Use Map: The subject property has a Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designation of Other Mixed Use (OMU) and a zoning designation of Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD). The OSSHAD zoning district is consistent with the OMU FLUM designation. Pursuant to LDR Sections 4.4.24(B)(3), within the OSSHAD zoning district, business and professional offices are allowed as permitted uses. Based upon the above, it is appropriate to make a positive finding with respect to LDR Section 3.1.1(A). LDR Section 3.1.1(B) -Concurrency: As described in Appendix "A", a positive finding of concurrency can be made as it relates to water and sewer, streets and traffic, drainage, parks and recreation, open space, solid waste and schools. LDR Section 3.1.1 (C) -Consistency (Standards for Site Plan Actions): As described in Appendix "B", a positive finding of consistency can be made as it relates to Standards for Site Plan Actions. LDR Section 3.1.1 (D) -Compliance With the Land Development Regulations: As described under the Site Plan Analysis of this report, a positive finding of compliance with the LDR can be made, provided the attached conditions of approval are addressed. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: A review of the objectives and policies of the adopted Comprehensive Plan was conducted and the following applicable objectives or policies are noted: Future Land Use Element Objective A-1: Property shall be developed or redeveloped in a manner so that the future use and intensity is appropriate and complies in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations, is complimentary to adjacent land uses, and fulfills remaining land use needs. The subject property contains a 1,153 square foot single-family dwelling and an accessory 381 square foot garage constructed in 1939 in the Minimal Traditional style. The development proposal includes the demolition of the garage within the Old School Square Historic District, the construction of an office addition with nine (9) parking spaces, and associated landscaping. The subject property contains no special physical or environmental characteristics that would be negatively impacted by the proposed development. 145 North Swinton Avenue (Mako Technologies) - Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements and Demolition Request Page 13 Zoning Designation: Use: North: OSSHAD Balinesian Spa &Wellness Center South: OSSHAD Private Residence East: OSSHAD Pineapple Podiatry/Private Residence West: OSSHAD Castle Florida/ Private Residence As noted in the above table, the abutting properties are all consistent with the subject property with regard to zoning designation and are generally compatible with regard to use. Based upon the above, no compatibility issues will exist between the proposed office development and the surrounding land uses, and positive findings can be made with regard to Future Land Use Element Objective A-1. • Housing Element Objective A-10: The City shall support the conservation and rehabilitation of historically significant housing, especially where such housing is an identifying characteristic of a particular neighborhood. Housing Element Policy A-12.3: In evaluating proposals for new development or redevelopment, the City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. As discussed previously, the subject property is compatible with the adjacent properties with regard to use. Further, the development proposal will not have a negative impact on the surrounding area with regard to the criteria stated above (noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns). However, there are concerns as to the loss of the extant contributing garage. LDR Section 2.4.5(F) (5) - Compatibility (Site Plan Findings): The approving body must make a finding that development of the property pursuant to the site plan will be compatible and harmonious with adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole, so as not to cause substantial depreciation of property values. The subject property exists within the OSSHAD zoning district and is bounded by a combination of general commercial, professional office, and residential uses. Compatibility with uses is not a concern, as the proposed office development would be permitted on the surrounding properties. The adjacent properties along North Swinton Avenue are primarily one and two-story structures built in a traditional style. As the proposed addition is a traditional design of one and two stories, it is appropriate in terms of scale, mass and style for the OSSHAD. Based upon the above, the proposed structure will be compatible and harmonious with adjacent and nearby properties or the City as a whole; therefore positive findings can be made with regard to LDR Section 2.4.5(F) (5)- 145 North Swinton Avenue (Mako Technologies) - Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements and • Demolition Request Page 14 REVIEW.BY OTHERS Community Redevelopment Agency. At its meeting of October 28, 2004, the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) considered the previous development proposal for this property which included the demolition of both the dwelling and the garage and the construction of a Gothic-style mixed use development. After discussion, the Board voted unanimously (6-0) to deny the development proposal. The Board identified major concerns with the demolition of the extant contributing structure and the project's architectural incompatibility with the surrounding district. The applicant did not comment at the meeting. The current proposal includes the extant historic dwelling in the development, and the proposed addition is in keeping with the style and scale of the historic structure and the OSSHAD. ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION The development proposal involves a one and two story addition to the extant historic dwelling, the construction of nine (9) on-site parking spaces, the demolition of the contributing garage, and associated landscaping. Although there is concern over the possible loss of the garage, the proposed addition is compatible with the historic structure and the other structures within the OSSHAD. The proposal is, therefore, consistent with Sections 2.4.5(F)(5), 2.4.6(H)(5) and 4.5.1(E) of the Land Development Regulations, the Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Postpone with direction. B. Move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness and the associated demolition request, Class V site plan, landscape plan and design elements for 145 North Swinton Avenue (Mako Technologies), by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to conditions. C. Move denial of the Certificate of Appropriateness and the associated demolition request, Class V site plan, landscape plan and design elements for 145 North Swinton Avenue (Mako Technologies), by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. 145 North Swinton Avenue (Mako Technologies) - Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements and Demolition Request Page 15 STAFF RECOMMENDATION By separate motions. Waiver Requests: Parking: Approve a waiver to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(3), to approve the two proposed employee parking spaces situated between the front of the structure and North Swinton Avenue, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5). Landscape Strip: Approve a waiver to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d), to omit the required landscape strip to the south of the rear parking area, based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5). Site Plan: Move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness and Class V site plan for 145 North Swinton Avenue (Mako Technologies), by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: 1) That revised plans are submitted addressing the Site and Engineering Plan Technical Items as indicated in the staff report, and the listed conditions. 2) That, if alterations are required to the existing picket fence, details and specifications of the alterations must be submitted. 3) That a photometric plan which conforms to the requirements of LDR Section 4.6.8 is submitted. 4) That spun concrete lighting poles are provided on Swinton Avenue and NE 2nd Street. 5) That the existing concrete sidewalk along North Swinton Avenue is replaced with a five foot (5') wide paver brick sidewalk as noted on the plans, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 6) That a two foot (2') right-of-way dedication is made for the alley to the rear of the property and the dedication is accepted by the City Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. 7) That the alley to the rear (east) of the property is paved to its full width adjacent to the subject property. 8) That all existing and proposed utilities associated with the development are located underground and that a note be provided on the site plan to this effect. 145 North Swinton Avenue (Mako Technologies) - Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements and Demolition Request Page 16 9) That the proposed wall adjacent to the southernmost parking space in the rear alley parking area is eliminated from the proposal. 10)Submittal of a traffic statement is required. Landscape Plan: Move approval of the landscape plan for 145 North Swinton Avenue (Mako Technologies), by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: 1) That all Landscape Technical Items are addressed and three (3) copies of the revised plans are submitted. Design Elements: Move approval of the design elements for 145 North Swinton Avenue (Mako Technologies), by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: 1) That the historic shingle roof covering is retained on the historic dwelling and repaired where necessary. Demolition Request: Move approval of the demolition request for 145 North Swinton Avenue (Mako Technologies), by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: 1) That the demolition of the garage is delayed for up to 3 months for the applicant or the agent to attempt to find an alternative and appropriate new site for its relocation. Attachments:Appendices A&B, Survey, Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Elevations Report prepared by:Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner 145 North Swinton Avenue (Mako Technologies) - Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements and Demolition Request Page 17 APPENDIX"A" CONCURRENCY FINDINGS Pursuant to LDR Section 3.1.1(B), Concurrency,as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan, must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs of the requested land use and/or development application will not exceed the ability of the City to fund and provide,or to require the provision of, needed capital improvements for the following areas: Water and Sewer: Water service will be provided via service lateral connection to either the existing six inch (6")water main within the NE 2nd Street right-of-way, or the ten inch (10") water main on the east side of North Swinton Avenue. Sewer service will be provided via service lateral connection to the existing twelve inch (12") sanitary sewer main located within the NE 2nd Street right-of-way. Adequate fire suppression can be provided via an existing fire hydrant located at the northwest corner of the subject property. Pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan, treatment capacity is available at the City's Water Treatment Plant and the South Central County Waste Water Treatment Plant for the City at build-out. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to this level of service standards. Streets and Traffic: The subject property is located in the City's Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA), which encompasses the CBD, CBD-RC and OSSHAD zoning districts. The TCEA exempts the above- described areas from complying with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance; however, a traffic statement is required to keep track of the approved trips within the TCEA. Parks and Recreation Facilities: Park dedication requirements do not apply for non-residential uses. Thus, the proposed development will not have an impact with respect to this level of service standard. Solid Waste: The proposed 2,899 square foot office use will generate 7.83 tons of solid waste per year[2,899 x 5.4 lbs. = 16,655/ 2,000 lbs = 7.83 tons]. The existing residence generates 1.99 tons per year. Thus, trash generation will increase by 5.84 tons. The trash generated by this proposal can be accommodated by existing facilities, therefore, a positive finding with respect to this level of service standard can be made. Drainage: A preliminary drainage plan has been submitted indicating that drainage will be accommodated via a 25' French Drain. At this time, there are no problems anticipated meeting South Florida Water Management District requirements. Schools: As the subject property is an office development vs. a residential development, this project is exempt from meeting School Concurrency requirements. 145 North Swinton Avenue (Mako Technologies) - Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements and Demolition Request Page 18 APPENDIX,"B" STANDARDS FOR SITE PLAN ACTIONS A. Building design, landscaping, and lighting (glare) shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent X—This standard will be met once the attached conditions of approval have been addressed. B. Separation of different forms of transportation shall be encouraged. This includes pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles in a manner consistent with policies found under Objectives D-1 and D-2 of the Transportation Element. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent C. Open space enhancements as described in Policies found under Objective B-1 of the Open Space and Recreation Element are appropriately addressed. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent D. The City shall evaluate the effect that any street widening or traffic circulation modification may have upon an existing neighborhood. If it is determined that the widening or modification will be detrimental and result in a degradation of the neighborhood, the project shall not be permitted. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent E. Development of vacant land which is zoned for residential purposes shall be planned in a manner which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent F. Property shall be developed or redeveloped in a manner so that the future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; complementary to adjacent land uses; and fulfills remaining land use needs. Not applicable Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent X 145 North Swinton Avenue (Mako Technologies) - Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Design Elements and Demolition Request Page 19 G. Redevelopment and the development of new land shall result in the provision of a variety of housing types which shall continue to accommodate the diverse makeup of the City's demographic profile,and meet the housing needs identified in the Housing Element.This shall be accomplished through the implementation of policies under Objective B-2 of the Housing Element. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent H. The City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood,the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent I. Development shall not be approved if traffic associated with such development would create a new high accident location, or exacerbate an existing situation causing it to become a high accident location,without such development taking actions to remedy the accident situation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent J. Tot lots and recreational areas,serving children from toddler to teens, shall be a feature of all new housing developments as part of the design to accommodate households having a range of ages. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential developments located in the downtown area,and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent '.i 1 . ) 0 I i , 0 , TRINITY LAKE IDA ER ROAD \ N.E.E 4TH ST. POST il CASON OFFICE METHODIST ' CHURCH _ III Li W j1j > LiLI Q Q Q Z 1.J. N.W. 3RD ST. N.E. 3RD ST. Lia Q MI ��� > ME Q _ ciii • _ IP"' , _ CITY Mr 11 ATTORNEY �� 1 ,- al x o BUILDING 0 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DRIVE N.E. ••...., 2ND ST. z O Li CITY HALL (i) - /Ili N.W. 1ST ST. N.W. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST/ ST. • IIIIIIII 3 Li 4i z z lir ' x I— . ... . .... . _ _ .,.. . �C COMMUNITY z�= z CEN TER 111111 In IIWI p IIILF rho tlal TENNIS OLD STADIUM SCHOOL SQUARE l I 1 Z ATLANTIC AVENUELi f C POLICE SOUTH III'Q a > a a1 > > COMPLEX COUNTY o I- Q__0 ¢ Q r— COURT N N HOUSE 3 - . n Li Nj ci: vi vi N --ismili— 145 N SWINTON AVENUE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FL PLANNING h ZONING DEPARTMENT / -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM793 JI _ b 1 :+ •• OCT } ? ,.._i 1 , LEGEND,AND NOTES FL:.:;, PAVED •MICHIAARI TQ' ,n. ,.,,. .. .. EENCV NAL MAPoC ¢EVAT r'W A. I =CENTERLIYE ELEVATION+2150 _ NE. 2ND'STREET 6 +2122 +210J +2a88 +20.81 +2070 +2056 +2044 +2028 +1aL CONC =C07VCRETE re FF'E- +bt7s SAH I b =FWE HYDRANT +2a4o +2a45 +2042 +2aJJ +202r +2aas +t9-5 L FOLROD • %5/^ey 1 v A v 0 a0. =SANTARY SEWER CLEAN OUT _ . _.. . - . .r . ._. . ._ . utg xA E. - . - • -I• — S1R , +1E16 W M = WATER METER + = x( +2an1 +2060 +2a cam W++22a.74131.11+2025Y +20T) +&99 ;t +1988 +1969 • — . — . — ` . POE • • =OVERHEAD UTILITY LIVES T camf• b cowl N N =CHAN LNJC FENCE WADER CURB 4 BRKYC '.7' --.---.-- a W000 FENCE O. �, �4.T 5 .TS a 1.; C 25" +20.10=ELEVATION BASED ON NATIONAL ' / >- r`-"` GEODE77C VERTICAL DATUM 7929. SOLI?CE: W to m� i Z ;S i.8:', 6RCK WALK % ,,+ k 3 $ PALM BEACH COUNTY CHEROKEE BLONOr Li N o BRICK W '-; 1 STORY B: / � ` FLOOD ZONE, X 4 la 2T'o Jao BL[(XN : ��" $ = WATER VALVE LLO a, 20 a SSMH=SANTARY SEWER MANHOLE N el �,,, ?s?' LOT 1 BLOCK 67 ' ��, • N N , yp + - MAP OF BOUNDARY SURVEY T° cf N I HEREBY CERTFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS RUDE UNDER MY RESPONSIBLE CHARGE 22' ,� 1. -. 0A $ . AND MEETS TIE MMIUM TECW#CAL STANDARDS AS SET FORTH BY THE FLORVA ry +209 + r +2IJ " +�t4 " +214� +216 yati 80AR0 OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS ANO MAPPERS N CHAPTER 61017-6,FLORVA T. ADMYISTRATTVE CODE,PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027,FLORVA STATUTES 'o a, RODSET 5/8 ROY RAP 1131111 s1T.RVE. ,FC1JD 1/2•tom/ '� VC:7 55.7 ''.`.�y."i, +2t6 R'X)(M+216 • '0 �++ , ,Lt2asn5a +21r +zu +n4 ; itC.tr� 4 -Ci. s LOT 2 ..� PAUL D. ENGLE I .--_ NOT✓At 0 MTTIAOUY TTE SYTU TIRE AL OF A FLORVA A1D SURVEYOR & MAPPER#5708 --- ---F, NAL MO' BLOCK 67 za SURVEYORRAISED IC A ;„ �, O'BRIEN, SUI TER & O'BRIEN, INC. LAND SURVEYORS OESCRIPT70N: " "'' ' ' '44.1 +. CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION f/LBJSJ LOT 1,BLOCK 67, TOWN OF LNTON(NOW DELRAY BEACH), SURVEYOR AND MAPPER W RESPONSIBLE CHARGE: PAUL D.ENGLE ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED N PLAT 2601 NORTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY,DELRAY BEACIL FLORIDA 33483 BOOK 1,PAGE.3,PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, (561)276-4501 732-3279 FAX 276-2390 FLORIDA. t, i'i i DATE C SURVEY REVISE*9/17//04-ADD WATER& SSE 1„= 20, +%� JULY 14, 2004 SEWtR LOCAYCYS F.ELO BOOK PAGE N3 O DID?NO: ©COPYRIGHT 2004 o'BREN,SCOTER&ODREM Sae•INC. 0278 25 04-152d r•o..noT+= - JIMMY bI1081.81e1r1 l f • ANit in•AtiO 01,1ro. / 4 N[ in0 a1rI11 �'r�% IT 1,•,\rir,li,11111 t m1lrpWrt,IXJ•Ox II 111.1r1'011'_II"T10f..rl[� . r.vl III 111 1 111t ;; J/ •.III:1,194,IN11•II,=,n,or, J,l1n •>r MYI1••Rr11 1 1 11 (I / . f M,ID!r' I 1� MO. �I II NNl•vr�l w ..b•fry Nre ^V.1 .a be r.r•aua,areyl.•" uzaewlvz.y rw,..nw,n rrn LtgATgNIW N.T.S. .p•••r1w w.•I M .,Wr1•.A•j1••M•no.r•1Fr • el VICINITY MAP Me.^• ^•t•• •vrSrr LOCATION MAP ..,,•�I.,I.,.•a•r•••.t. 0 �x. _ __ ED o "°'" ED MAKO TECHNOLOGIES N.E. 2ND STREET _^ 145 N SWINTON AVENUE _ vb• L ,,.n.• DELRAY BEACH,FL 33444 I 1 / • SITE STATISTICS r • €�11iI:.•,`�:,.�,4:., wri+�:� e.1, ��::= E G!}+! , TOTAL MV[nN+n[A: 100s,IyT 1001 0•nrz €I111It =t 1' i > . x t r 4 , 41 Q VIA non anoMMO noon+n[. s111!Off 111 a IIrz suxs,,x x, .i sxt•.• s.$ z s=xf.sxsx•x•••x x.£)==3=?€="si'•ir€?€1= fi i€€_€ ':;£"�4€€1i1€F€+4"r=iFi,'1"€i•"""isisizl zu x i?I F 10T.,ro FLOOR[MC(+n[+ nn sar 1.a IA s'i=iiaix?y,;i;i xRslssiii is xs=sx•}s+xs?n,;1;s;t•4,z,•:•£•: :•=£•Y:s#sx •....£1s�? •sx££ x3••1•?,K• •x£1.k.,x •1:?r£ ,,:3 t x 1£•=.. lout noon.•[M Inn sort L1 a Nrz /l;xsi•sx£•4•sxl z•%;x3x£.:.:I.1=:1=3D =!; .a.1%?•xsx•.i::.: s=z:''=`€!€?€?i:.s...,s.} ,H;.:.:xz.s=.:x F Fs}£1r=%£x.?, 1x=., j /`t :z..}'.x==S€:€3 s x.F;€?£?£xs olli f. ..1[I,:.n[.: 1 n sl:00 nlrt f..x.1}p,, .x:.sl:x::•.x.x,s3 "= iiz ,<i:....x.x.1.:s:s.;.e.x: s=l �IxAa.,•e.., z•sx:i=I 1. y}:€'.g{fez,}•.£�i!: r•,si..Sys :=x±€x=1 x€.s s t..��xs,}zj .,7 rslawo♦ulen na n !'?SIP€441'F=•z F.,ixs•4F i''ii?,, 3• Tz 143. _=='?i£%i ii)£x£xs1::1%„?,,, s•sF:Fy.•x`!i1£xx€Iii •1ipxEx?Fiy1;1£}!i€I HI 4 1bil£illi6?£1•1..1Ii xsb3d3 ?Ixz.I,11,..£#F€I.II.€sx.£i£,._... ;,?ix£xRS..lIb1?}sii3f.. r 1w[o PACE .oeT Log .I.or la ttt;I£i I?li 4 fi I?313 3 S?4 I£1 ix�1••£=£}�1.14 j31 1 s: 1 1 1 ._ I. - +a,�imc[ 0 srT DI Of nrz I I£=IF f f J �� _. - ?e ?r`;r lMtr �F:•j• • T, • A„,„„,y � rD+..�•. I ; 1 !)r '+ `J ✓f� D Y y Yy I11I Ic 3F€;I +i r.` .0 n0,1= r,lu ..,,,,,,I g t ,4'3" r" i 1'. ti `'.$ 1 ,?i t( wc•. x O,44 1 �J 1 tr+cn Ft.Ioo fort or ornc[MCI E14 i ll v a +i .- r i 1y .€ N x€'I ' TOTAL iron to rn•1110 1 an o•10 o+m nr+sl £ 1'r �. 1"3?'1IIIIIN• se ne�.t,< I €y€� ! }€ J 1,; .� y t t i +^ 3 q / roril,n+xao n.tt1 rrovloro 1 1 €} „� I 1 n II (" y r 1 e! 4;} N•° u•w• n.o 6 ,s�.zlF€.'•I% 1 KO., 6. II F4 r 1k F} i$d ti, z.Ff , d J i �'1. i,,. €. —�.- 1 cow+cr 1 Ii,l r! al n ` -:i, me' Olt I L oI!! 1! !f/ .$ [/ =1€:! x.14{j3z?:€?1s F£%s ?R£xi% iz.•:;i:x= 'x 1 rTa } Nm w 1 InIO y1I b1€1i<',igi4lVV 'F.?€ igiii1ti% ix I Il 1���11111 �y %•, �-T�I nomn[o nerv.c 1€ IIIN1iK€IIIEISIsi:.i FSI?�1:1€`si l ss.lxl;1l,i:l; i. £ r... t I ; .e;==i::llir..41?xlt. •': ':Ar• 3 0411i1111116141 3 a, 'I € xonx 11'•0• n•-I• W z 3 i .,f 41 €£x= €?" ` I r[ 41i11 11£ 11 q wv x r.r0. i 331 €x€ 1 ,• 1 } �� /% I vrnr 71'-0• n'-11• Z i I£t1£'j3 1 = 1f=l;I t ;£ 1 11 #I 6!i �/€ 1 s.,Mfx0.xr1 T .. ci i ALV4I r r " (? :4 4£t l•ti Il bl rii , i.y}£?6 f l l � €i€isE1 4 1lE3ixi 4£. £Y'si £ s `[ounw 11'-0•wnwuM1l h 3crvux r.•n/1'1 �e. , co..cr1 4 1 £III•r i y �Dr.I „x. Mnacu 1,` x}£}I a j %F€ I41 4 r 1 zI"1y 3 39 Iz ` 1£ 1 4 llF€b , �i. 1 Is f 11 :°t I�=1I1`;z • € €3€ t �r w1 !�, �,, E3€.�Ng 5' • I I unr 1.n11 tta.1Lif� w lag: o o[u+r nueu xi Y 3 4 1 E}ii}}€?4l ir£ i tx�•� ? _ i,{ 1 I: 8 1 #, i colNxo To d[TT cuucor [0•0[0 1x ru Z z t 1¢1 s}Sii'#N {l i 11 4 1 ?I N i }' f#Ell €i1�xz 3 ! NI I € I unuc rtco.ol+ u Iucx cowry. I !Ii•I1SIl h?£ 4.411 1 1€� j ,ilib 3"c;;nl l:£_L i' q i ioox=.r+oc n,r S' 4 i / FLORIDA. st Isdk i £1 /7+xwo;op mxo m to ••I• ,}•_•: IS ' . II } l� a WHOM.rmrna • N 1ph'" d$ i£Flxx''I x'y 3 `j1 ==I .Y1€!i1€i€`ii�l Is14� ,,wx w .r arrlce orrice errlce vv. acunxc=-Zee I ,(£ i€ 1€p? £ }£;11 R sylr Ili P,, €!}3 •or 7: x TTrt p wxmucr ox . 'I 3£F iFl 1f%IF`<«3t•?flil.k'II dQA':1:1I,I1*„,!1„ nn con In [xu xr.nl.looe[onwx cram T.1 F I ;J'x 1 �1"'=Uli";'!�I=€ilia `;i%f£14• `£,I l:%;: €•:1� uw• sic• 11w / Z4`• ,C ox xn rvnnnn occunxcln. unx, am[1aIII1:.•I.4" I 'I i€°Ix 14-• it t'I`"ty [[? yx£j li i zx' a£ 'l143 311 '4i2yS1j I 1 [4 S I Alt, �mo�muarz.n,mn ron MC 1•.Ixl,un AMP n.[a i$11 1 I;a ita!!�3€l ass f!Il.F 4 • t..1£g!3%£F�I.. .!.,. ,14 1 ,,,"II I £�I1 !,• 31i IMO g •41 `•-x•• 4 v'` 1 Haan ow rw.t'x 4.1444 b lil la A bb • V �,.b. plO• k __,, W REVISIONS 08330IFW / 1[II,pC4ny al•1llNW NTS W1693 111eo1ow wl,vlw ..............- MARCH 16,2005 • ti ti I- A-1 .0 OSITE AND FIRST FLOOR PLAN Drawn by:TDS sSAI.E:tl8'.1'•D' o:=Ait£IttMI11R�r011Ctsi11=lntF(O�M21...in,�_ 11111. 1 f I r__ Jeffrey Silberstein \\Il. !l4 N■ Ina.1.••1 Aidli _ h. O.I,.11....11.,:1s 11.11 < -,- > TO.,"III -. ' 1/1•!Tl•lilt PO.•,111 - ( san1.nl•oul •.m:lo:,umupunu..a III .nu.H.w Iary�.••d•.W�as IIN.in��.. aN,a 6r.M •n.%u W� N*ands CTIG M1Mn/.....IM.M t on 01 of. .or*..NNl•ate II N.yyr•Nn.ypo. ..NVN IYaI e...a�Y•9 WO midland...OenW sowM. a„at - MAKO TECHNOLOGIES 145,N SWINTON AVENUE DELRAY BEACH,FL 33444 02N0 FLOOR PLAN OROOF PLANCD SCALE:1/S OO'.1'•0' SCALE:1/9'.1'-0' LEGEND OF MATERIALS e, \ p $TAI01N0 GSAM MGTAL N#f•SILVER LI I I �---"'- ..'9� - Q rN«rz MINKS I4GKeT MILD 0 a II ?• II _u [. rwlrz aucK ro MATCH(AMC( i� i. II U 0 1 { Q ctsAn.ue ro.vovm 1 vows• D..�ia C"-AR NG oTrZ RG011:41T•GOL01l warz ig Ili MTN.NT!TIVM 0 Ili E -_— ■I ''-(_I1 I. a IN f.f�l OLOR�'N�TE�TGN 6%I,T:N! rp II 1 •]!sv "Ill!�I�@1IC •I .3..••' ., �.„,1 p /ram YWTE rIUM --- -., t - -.-. a, --"'--—- 0 oasnw uer,r e1.m+sMmGns 0 0 0 OSOUTHELEVATION 0ans* aonTnuwww000WO& SCALE:1/S'.I'-0' 1 • ILO..TYPICAL r.o.a.x Lw1I o7 _ — ,elsroo:uw rn.nlw .� i6U II 0 {�::lElE .'�'- 0 f.ofs.xlnu 3 0 0 �J•Yi�i� Ir—� ;' 0 ' hs Li. ��'sIIIIIII11111U�1— is *..IMMIA = 1:ri III ili i !I� Fay II it p a ��— �R�' ��: �� I 9 SWINTON AVE lo47------"--a ALLEY .y»_�\ r.1 - ` 'IilIilL ,w- �- �. o �0 1.2010 0IN Cf 011/..Y.M ®NORTH ELEVATION-CROSS SECTION SCALE:1/8••I'-0' I fwnl.x Lam--1 II U II IlIIIIIIIIIIIIl11I 1 I II_II_IIIIIIIII--IIIIIIII"IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII' REVISIONS 0 • •—''5��� 1 S 0 �fiil�•.l���� 0 Q TAO ASYOW Hfwfenx ulu ����■ �1��� 0 _ _ Wlwa "'III��III��1111�I�I _fllin,•ili I ° p. p Q ���������II 1 C�IIII�IIUi111111w 1^ I r - L" MARCH f 2005 T u ■■ ■■ EN ■■_ c e, 2ND � I �: : I I_u1 iI1=1111�~s- , �, g 1 -— _ "�'�"I "I '�I . :�r'=, ..1= _@IIIIII . IIIBI ,I] , . --_'° . °° 111- 1: A-2.•1 ear; 00.a tlON 0 0 bran sAn ,- iy 0 I Down by:TOS (WEST 9_EVATION•CEROS1-SECTION (EAST ELEVATION ay„d„a,,,,,r,ff,Gq ,,,1m„I,p. . ..,, .y_:..0 , --. 1 I 1 • DTER WATER METER CI rARET LTOA BE I 1 DETERMINED IT THE CITY PERMIT REACH r N,[. 1`ID SA�ECT UTILITY DEPT UPON RUILDINO PERMIT .PIPE L •Ra, •q Eau .PAR WATERAPPROXIMATE E SERVICES Or APIUGTION •+$ 'arm rn ' TO VERITIES S' T LOCATION APPROXIMATEITNO L MAIN or S' TO RE TOR LOCATION [%ILITNO WATER TO BE SITE AND PRESSURE BY CONTRTACTOR ,IRMO By CONTNTATRTACTOR BEFORE— Mr. BCFOC[CONSTRUCTION. �CgN$fAVCTIgN. -- Argiller - , OUT-IN HEW SERVICE WYE POT I" PAVED EMOTING SANITARY - SEWER SERVICE PRECAUTION SHALL IE A SEWER MA•NHOLE RI4 MAD[NOT TO INTERRUPT EXISTING N• . 21\II' STREET "EA E IB'I �'' ;? E SERVICE INV[Ri CUV.tO,IS_ - I 1+ Er `l. rr:o rr,rr 71.OJ .ROW .:Tot .rare .ro.1r •20.11 .rO.Ir .raol I-- I w; ' i i Roe '� 9 4`•',174, t p APPRO%IOGATION Or 12' L FC'R �C r--[%ISTINO SEWER LINE TOSW ora I / BE VCRIEICD BY CoNTR•1t.13 CTOR a1r.7r p - `; i I Jar • 5•A • A' � f017 .10]J *RSV / alp it .,I IS 2 Y tri I ill PAVED I �- o a 'O +u = LOT 1 I / n1T CO R ` OLE Qll` c� 9 99 BLOCK 67 \.. I h 04111 iI IIiI,tQ P R VI y141 IP�I'll 'JY.pilli Rl l Nlil Hillilli,1li11 I'1111' � JBI !II ihN;i,{ ipl,np`q'„of nolip I p� t l•11,p;1141 .rr.1 POLO (IP i„ E / �� a !1 + a: /1111•'"willil�Il il.iIMt7�AT7 II S 411,11 b(d4 li il!!Iiri,n�I ;t iTill i lei: 131, 1. ..0,1%;;,,4lb(f 2 t11iE0 r il'i rPird tIi rr.rr r jliiill ••A Puw ill tr CD it F Er I N E I /r. F1 SOT 6%[ 'i!j I I �,gyp+ J�I JrT r ! y I!Ij 1. rjpr a"SWAIE - 4!'mar p 6 RAc �}lt 11�r .�..+. • �1+7"+"ITT- v. ti�..,w 'Gd�L E a 111:111,?.. I�T yI 6 v �e y 1.11, 0 [� F •nJ Erb 4 1 0 �'{ +;.:•" y I 1 ;�� l,w -0r�•.ii1l�t. P R I u LOT 1 ,I.r P� I k '1i• I WO i�IIMI M BLOCK 67 , 11174, H, p - SCALE: 20 Li Lill 3 I / ® � �I�� WI a ',�I��I tj e1Yill I,I�iiIW11.rill A NI 1111111 ,nil' ii' ,*I 1ui I Ihlillil I I{I IIII,I I I.1 f I I IS+I�nI inp In I II , 04. I OAS' c`� o R 1 III, I I;I. I ' r I!1 ,la IE 41 1 _ i,. D 1 ;• W Ei 11 i I ;I Ii. 111 1,1AlFh�.i I` II!I ;I I / I I R.am v. to p!I IiIf yla1, Ppl 5 i II:IFI II. p i ago: 01 • t 11! iill'�i`ill6 !I;� ' fi Intl I llt4l!. i 11 lil�i�I II f Ilfi�l�!Ir i ��,'� t{IIIIIRr,I�L(i I,III..1a111ib ^'Tit ' ,e..aP.RMRRN,1 if, I I.E.Inn. r '� Q i'ii EliiIiit;iiii4ii14 `ir , ! E i iiMey�nl"� :n— ��� 111'�g �i !u-'- 1 I 5 +I� IYY.'tp II I k Ei1.11l�l'l 1,!Ir Gh�i ,.• . Ip "1♦;f!,I�II�I� .II4to Re u _L JOCAiION MAa I- c I I t!!!?muli E�..1,,,,IL 71.4waR W p1 9 I h R 11,111 V .ro.r - i ; 411.3 .r,] .11.1 .r1I I r' o,,,,,,P.' , R H RCAF Pa(TP-SS) 4 l a 131,11' r,,,N• 'Kw""�"oS I I, /.. I 5R.Ix Ai _ R k uo.1 •rr•o .ny.r .rr.J .11.1 J,.e _J Ai I - -- vnR �I�T'94$Eia 7 9 N I !.. �� r R.N. U�' SCALE:1:10 I g.A [�co p L DRAINAGE STATEMENT SITE DATA EXISTING SITE CONDITION O?L0M Trr rpm 11 41 A •` J ^ • i! THIS IS TO CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF o• a � THAT THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE ADEQUATELY • LEGEND: 3 e DESIGNED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH LOT AREA 10031 SF o FOXING TINY d11INVOR% L" LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION AND WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY GROUND FLOOR AREA 2316 SF �nA PROPOSED ELEVATION ETANIARD I'.1r =PACT r.1r PAVER AREA 1949 SF .F, DRAINAGE ARROW NANKAP IV Ir PLOT B•rlAMP AREA P. HAVING JURISDICTION. .re.I2 000TINO ELEVATION PAVED S AREA 1087679 SF TYPICAL PARKING SPACES DETAIL PERVIOUS 4087 SF H PROPERTY IUN BMRTNO SG4L N.T,R LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Cea• PROP CATCH BASIN ORANNe LOT 1,BLOCK 67,TOWN OF LINTON(NOW DELRAY BEACH), 00. SANITARY SEWER CLIAN-OUT CNECNEO. • W PERFORATED ALUMINUM PIPE AIM ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF,AS RECORDED IN PLAT C.P,I. PERFORATOW INVENTOR BOOK 1,PAGE 3,PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, DATE FLORIDA. +} De4me.[xm IO ONTRENG Ro0e105 JOS NO. 010Bd1SLSH SHEET NO. �C1or 2 • GFNERAL NOTFQ PAVINO.GRADING MO DRAINAGE NOTES • r / 30' "�'. 2"` Meng,=° , ueum..... .ea..na s2a.w .r °m" or uo'waioe woii wne Zur,°•��' .1-,41.0.1."r' :e°" u•u,N./ r 11.110 i'w`6u,,. Pi..d w 2,..MO UT .. M tz• 'tea 417=.111. . vaa.vcrom # a'o:xd°Iw, .... �M.:"�a W: �� �e�:�'�.�.:. tf ' q t w.��""aL`�.�. , w _ >�..�.w".e.'"�, + ▪E ...e2.2,�f,-4."` ,,, o ++.H �` tit'`4��KL., NO v�r 4-+Mew---1 .. - \L m°'92, uw�..,m2x =gto.cithr ,n ararro now.m•. °r is ium a'mnw K7 .• {-:I I;L:-,r :at.1 =. .� •mom a�InF L:�' _ t. ..r� nr� OM,n NO m= .✓.. CURB-CUT DETAIL • .�m2'�w w2.o.Ken."""o,.'�,'n +�F ,�u •`"'Z.°I'r°,"d�.'"ze t� r�w m a uwww n..w x.r.s. • w.sL03.ap'..w oa rrm I � f .' 5, •' ,.wo°' c°iuw.i2i'I .oM°w2a raw m ,r._. rwr .+ou,. •'•.wm:�w:u , .ra w,...r. w:..s ,r 'W'-�•. ,9,,. .r r'&Ja'g" w + ,.'w'a'�,mo:�w M�.'.' " .e21x.x s ::i.rw. •' .J."o: . OF 11.1.1111011 100.4`W.."`,a�'.'`d . o ys rsi-.r.ear '_ 01.01. i° "Y s �e�`,0 +MI. 41/411=0,WO.0 war+uwwuw r1, POMO* • e:,K'oa�w�i{r�"i2°°.w2r":.nwwwr2°o..nros 101021 c:.010.a Mew uwa..OF 'J • "`.r^11�:d�.`�'."."lY.Y.m..w"^ $:'.:r. V.n. a w..rr nr a lcr".A cr°°'i2ca u.°.itatwu" 7 s ro.,74..emx�m'z°. ro.aw..a..r- u 9 M..vna �s o+w.�.wuw.r "+ '!:I.�.y °"Y P „!n CCk r... rrP.STREET/STOP svi - • Wenyw Yq a....anwl eow.m..L.M..npW r Mel.ue� a s _e �, ra ,M '2w�'•/w.t uw um2 firr'ar.M" ii •u r,"+n'a a,>S Dm rw W1 N,2..Ya.WW1 LOW Iww04 rwn,i c&2Pw2 ' ' 6 r.w am N.$1.r AMMO m L.I.a 00T01.011.1 .�a r2w aCOY.w w�v oennw:arun .... •w o2. " .;�^�'9"�t••^ S[ maws nit TYPICAL TRENCH DETltI(. FIUSH HFADER CURB ..u+m"' 0401u 100o"OLEN rearm M ` '•'><w`1.... "` C°"""`°0M 5 Vol -.l • � xu x.r.s. .°".eo.'>Oe.Or'"'°..a M.0... • __ 111014:. ,:.•:.r_:.• Ewa w 121.0. ".ems .: ..,,�M 9i Aliaice- n45 ��..y���ee.,. 2i.'.'Mw.r10".iji"' oo40041 ILL.._._m, op IYTILL r.ns 0rert^x-rrrr•r' CLIL1aWA t:C7[ea ,.,.e , ,wx..ve aw..M1 MO MN...osur. m,.Pwex4.. NO noia.m V :.w..,wm ""'"w.'M"�,"w w`m°�mrn,n:�u'.;" '"`Oo ,:au .'.:a.°b.:r�'" W FRENCH MAIN DFTAlI$ 1� tzar..., • 1 P919 -- m P_ Merl Irk N Kr.Kerr Mere 0 ��� �. lid IIMr�nns �� ir 11 g o ... i( 11 p. �I:7 '!!� + 31JY.' 7.74.1117 .a. �s.�IN rows ad 2 <d osparrarossrorossoa .°0111 IF Erast.ramprosmorasti •..• '»111 over r"`117R7 n0, •.':i.":Yfc.%r%',•%'.ati•t,�e•- M.rrrr MTAi a. WTI,^r,rfLICaiiis or, . :.1 • • Il Ovn�III�� CONCRETE, Q „j w,.... RA • mttY r• r 7.'7:a" a_�py , i i-A s)e•LOSS ogi �`m:.''1 •''�'• ;•L „ir wo Keo2 • •mil- V-I..SS "r44t...,M.......r .�1 g ,.-.. .r.2..2.m2."... '.� ai' 1 �r,:::::-- Iron w'miui',> 4.. I , 0 1•I•� ^• nvIIi r gC7r,.�'�allay e "°T�" NI= v -°i ,00s 2��errr'v°....'°' iii mMu. ro,i .Y.r..,r• It t�.: r�,..�,.., TYPE"DF CURB ,w:...1' iu°r'o'' � -9 sa,a.owa../ F� TYPCCAI CATCH BASIN VITH +Mew rs...w....... ' PILLIITIDN RFTARDFNT DFVICF PAVER BRICK SECTOR FOR CONC.WHEEL STOP SOL STORM SEWER MANHOLE PAVEMENT REPAIR DETAIL GU 1.1 AU.ON-SITE SIDEWALKS MA ci � L FOAMY..Aw.a.mom, ,,.,. "TO 4�me 0: 11.1001.Mo w xopw..(,....0 .xl Mew ,i'&XOr'Dulltwm .0 tC a 4 1,..,,, .1-,,....,... rat_ w � .� s �%CSC. r$07t 211,1 .04 8 W S 4 I I1 rrra `vv WHAM!w. .`.i My."w•n"`w tr. T II r u.r )VO Ai:-".n2o"S r I'0 r= //gip. . ' $ q ... Ilk.. 9' l/ r'"+a'S°w"."°o, r r.,m Yii �r�� •. .r.r n.. r.�r aos. V e-0 �� M•»..« t,:a"tM III 11 tee.. d e °ior em`"'w4owr ..w PA CL.._, 10.0Y )fir ssaws Ow'b°f1. INUFAMMI r r r Y. r-q fir, m.µ aitr• 1.1. la IT r. ,r .woo LS 1/0•sue "r' i� nw v axnr vrw* .4 •,rm�• Fi ..i"'. 3dbr� [w.2r If-"m'q' .: ',4-7_.' VP run.. enw now "I11...e 401 to N•ir soap DRAWN. m'.w C`.. IMF F 2111,r1114)TM. 0 °""2" wrow Inerr r Mr.0 r Pu. JO .io.•.. wwm n.s.nw,ws CN10NO now[ u w"i li ww.oi' r.r..m.rw rem i24,r.2 Mew PUT SUPralr nrrus arm.Won uio a') AMA you •"'+•coward m .r.ovm n.ras ....r err.nor.ewl...w.rrs v mow*Mr OATH I. oL.x.m.m ear M..xMnl4 o.wr.mw4 2N atw a,w.2m wm.ril w.ro.,ALL . 1 M.x2 Kew w..O+rwaer MX.Iw UV. I.AL 0.01.01.wr N W.4M Mn rem.. 0Y00,01 -LIMO r.0111..1wrr0.VW M1•MM. 1 OW..rw MI ewr e.w.,.,la la TID��IBI2•a oA..riOS.b,cmNn ' ,�.'�At w°i'rm 1p JOS NO, SEWER MANHOLE FRAME d,COVER TYPICAL CLEANOUT DETAIL WA 5.1 SEWER SERVICE COI I I�IiIIDETAIL W'W 4.1 TYPICAL PARKING SPACES DETAIL RT 4.2 REDUCED PRESSURE ZONE BACKFLOW PREVEN 0400441430 „ SHUT NO. • C2or 2 ' • \ + db N.E, 2nd Street .__.________ — -- —— —`---— JERRY TURNER az,® __ _ © ____ _____ ® 0 I & ASSOCIATES JAS I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE r I £}£€£€f€''> LAND PLANNINO AIM.U/ '/ar;111-.; j 7.11. 4 28 ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN _______—_—_i__—_____ IM 1I,I I I V a-I//''/��/�i//o/ A D' POLE P ��. i�lillllIIIII£411`c/% � //C �as/ �1. --- � r, ems.. i 1 — — [ +f 44 s f££ti. ,sf!{i.! 1=4 h i£:£t4 8i, y£!£1!:££52{y;i£ri£€€€^Sb'!(( s..I.fiy: t !{{s •.:!€y Yilg=11 5{'!p.{! 1111[ f'es'€:!}ESet!£,,t:liyil 1,`s},f II0M li y£!tg!£ltisiISII:^t{€s rNf� oDe JD•RS ni+NNUN Ro+D { fi#. .�x..r€1. €i.€€..:. i€...€t. ..:€t.. :€$.. €'S.3£t•,xn€.. 5!:,t.{€fai.h•:i1•�xt.ty };;£,•'f,i'i4:i£yN £f{:}£#.51.I.<£y t iil I::l i i£: i}f ft.£.:f.:'i i t.t=Rjyt€€i=£=>5.t I S RALcION r+a[5i cL of >eoe /4,II:!i i},i, x€i£,}}:£.'.;1=1•5•if:}i€"€!i•..N. •t:et i y{€ IIi/I•txt=,.!£.a=,..i.t.x i.•ti.: ;xt•f a..11`.,, y :! •:;=I •.€.£:5 •5 £€; £•:.:i£qi;!.F i.y:£::=.=ti;i,y:y y y:i•.y tor.€.f POLE J m !,}!,€{{I.x}3,5 t€£.�.�i12£,[S=a.,}.,t sit:,f,.f.[5 i=Sli=,= 4j it;!:,i:i:,4 jk.:,:£',.4..:y:.5=.€:5.!}j•.,it.£,,.:�f.ti:1[+�;€ta•!•�i1i1•£eti iEi t•..,•i. _._:,•..£_ .€t .. ,.!'..5 q .£N:£'�•ti€ [a1 r)dI_>f ao © 1 /i13141€ .Ji €i,14,;£ii 1 ,,.,„ !r,„....,. ...?£`€ 31 € i$:;t€ €ail£ i€i,fl4,£4a%ts,i•i s,slfF.££�`£€sUY.aGlri€J4itxU�l llF u}£:Ia.s€3:€£€i:£i^3ii?v:€::£�i€£:'�3�s€#:3s1£€€>sS�l.£se€S; ._.._.._. j €I IIi 44€ ��.,�� - 5 ..3s�1'31��� �"� �//jll Yiit�v eucN wiio�oA aaeeJ I. 1 //1,II 1 tbr, / iiy' €"€LO'0:0:600ii.0A00�< eel na-oua �Iti€t��/IA ® � , Alo' }r PLANTING NOTES: i�i�;-��! f3�'��! I LLL �T'2 AI �P}€: nov In C u.e t ae rw„[e a et Mots ferPe t I,N.i e•uv•.e emotes, i�•IFIi'• '1£I� ` �' {€1 �Li v ® i ,, n'Coml.ne shell r.,Merry Moots veil F NM.,sive.i/ 2•t€',' ••• -'= €€gIII•a r,'lot.or nrme,D•ertmrR or Watt.leeM,,,,, /1111,€1'1€f:€'f€'yj l�r i MAKO �� !•€e€? ` �, �o.•� i►'[, of .�'I{I£t' £ m Ae..a.AM„e.wwane.re6ryP...rP.rnwa..a,r TECHNOLOGIES } ,�Y�x= / ` /f OOAA.00,€i£ 100 e r. :l�OAQO.0.Z?o •4A lR R .00 rr.em rmrra.I1h e..T ® ' i, Po'n ® !a's+1.01 ��O — 'Ani0.000.0.4 L�.C•0.0,>j 4�an (.�k [oea:a sin sl arvNx.•nwNo r wn...e:'�`+°«.'.°,ei a:w...e Mr e• ® F\r'\ ft .w v `/ Ac�Arr ...': /�1.[, f 4J4s�1'I 0 e e[bo• r Mal e.mIAM.e m ore+ae.mn[„w,••r a'c,w•A v . {t1'. /I �i J ® IVC44s5aL m► roeewim msenr, ♦ €€j� 11it i xfff mp IIJ 61 f,!�0 ewe It,-R.. nArm.1r meet, am a 0e--I• I i €€ , �13 £ji�€1"l ,€},ill��,i [—�� 0 © �S%q n.ym.iw,.r vM.• rw.® � / I,I€£,t€s€5!'.�si€€S3I#�t,t�yl,i€€��I,€'/_.`_ li I ® '�r^S;,1i _© NwSN,m•�.rwl•[••wa aoTev.. / ,ly E@li€1€lll 4,€#1!€€ili f=!€£iiin£ii,,A I r• Q t.€. e•ee•o.b 1•A,mIM M meRrMr,7.,TIV mer we NI•rr••fw•a,• L o V €!•11,11401E t€?:€£?tR€I£I£3s.:itlitt I€i!,€£x'€:SSl.ii€,t'�1 0 t I ,�sPi° FtsM M.rw..w vlwlw, Nfc.IN«,a.lwaNw•Net.. i i 1.€i•{,i i p'I •t.tt€1y•€}!•.{f'fro• , .I♦.. 1 001111Igo', 1 r-r411 v llisi€,€llrFt€€};I. } •i€.€,,£i 3 €s 5= AR Iran r•le Is[1ew•a•Ae/r fora a[In.eeiW oe the Mona,delete. ;i,;0 o .=•1xj,j,l:lil;€v,�?`i£il`•4: A L$Pi T t€€':I,j;1 .ti;••lr,io.t.P.!Iiib g p . ''� !€''' , t metros.R.....Howl..Nnh.mYm.r r[a•M.•wa n.N. w12�{.,���' €I'•,£iii;€}€€,€,!'� . 1;..:.i yi ii11;€•€1"' € '�m �, €ts i P� /% 1 s€3 } eR rw/J•ore...too[m•ea y/.s and•we. t I.mNwo•ea to ear > .•A�a€€ii;: �1/.F'/ i�7i� `€� 'I I • / ` €S!; i I[r€'£.yr{— v.,:v 1 i°i-1-[1.3..,or ewes n.o. 133meoa r m:s rr[y rnr to re•PS Y €{€€t11 /L+—.� �/ i€! N MIwtr a © ;' I, c I 1:1!£gg€il , \E.v �".!a,41 i if� .4ii l/ Ark uVO II [rewlr...,.,wI Ih weiw..r[.. Lea�wd.eet..I Z 0 � d € { ,>f f# t•• 0€€ Twa. e.A i.r sr• °• .M b .me t! Q�;,//� ..1.ti ..i£.{ 1.... ! €€ €,..y €. m I't/ r r wenw.:t."r;m:..;e:'S,.'m.. :5 t..:,rle >. O I €i: �// €3£�' / p s i.i{7€µbI yet€£aT,.. £_ ,i�� /{ oleoRl,. (,1! € +,yv air." •£ d €,{1.41 t I£l rG,•I • De N.Swinton Avenue I-- m 1 $ 1q4... a f' 11 1 ■_ m i j(��#, f£, €51 C a Z i�Ii',sI "`;°'Aj/3i I`''3£yi �E++ �� •i ll!,€Lii I,',•€l i{y1; f (1I1 tg fe.e.'s them r•^•r.r.IRV..• wu, a Mel.[woad wr u• Defray Beech,FL ® I I N .€�£jii13 , R ! 3 r. I£) COMPACT ce.vnr.nn a re . r rift IM•-eiR Eh°wla wl nrrwwo.. ,TEENY Y s j;k-'•,.,Tt% '1 ry: y ti 0 II€ 1I IIIII0 ?M,R,'•it�: 4.s ..Ihr Lwaeew.rchI ect le le e.nellnea sr elrm.o mn rw w N in�\ 0.44{1'O0�}ir , €,45£e zi i_:ro• ' v { Io , '}I�� © IC I€' .wont { TAC REVIEW YE! u'� �jj£ 1 3! �� O .y1.A -0' jr ,•� 1 +ey.nel M.nt m.I•.aI[e r.-0.Vag be rretwtet am,or°wnme Oh Q E t•F 4�y/�/ s€'''t,'Y[{51'§ TOO1`€tit ,�{ GII ;I` 6F% •• 6 y.memle,.mr Re e.eor.wa by Mr lento."A.Mn.eR. COMMENTS 1 I:t !• Y% ;,i.l ts. .N;4 il aY,'€.':•° fit! �i. 3it1•' 3a;i, I An Iwa.<w�Iswa..m aAr meeww.arw9 ih•I r.eepewl I.RMI<sr 04/1 BJDS NW Ark\ €i1 e€€10,' £ I' •x.tl....N:SE 151•4'1-I I8•: L ,£iE,II,I'_5,`:?,€1f al,,1i€ti,,yt - .t;�wt € :::i:s'nM«n e«vex..rwaw.Nh<rr.I.n«.mrmi.r..wnle,.i p € ;0 {•.,i1i1:,111€€i'::€€£=t€Ia4€•yt£€:t1€•I s 1.li <ryy,Y i`3,i€:3 t,i !€t€€1' ,{ "1€iEi ,£.31€it€1$3dtR}N.;:E jt€£a� Y I\ m 'il 'r3! €II,•i£:�£Alit 3,7 € -F E fi€y ih.rmw.a wnlw er the RDr.ea� t[°M. wrl Ia•we Lr M, �•,[3€4c �/ I,, N' ,�€:!i'€ y ,, ; I Lam► ® sy'£€:V CN 4 .l!iill € € f i=:i to kit,is.£ L; '�� wa.et reoe+.r Mw se Ire in ra we ,.m. ® .-1,..z,,,i tl€£,S€£f='s€(€it•y,•€€€I,!!€£FY{!{{€ i yt {:} Ai. 0 m 0 Roc,€l3 11 -. Ae Iwawee•ors r•1•a L,I,m•a w ants° r mb[wm•1[sox....sego. MT 1i1 j€{4il.3,1 iJi45`i';-I€€€ti'{s t€t;yil:£I1'EI,•iif K }�i€,;yi;,si..y =`:€: i I I I WI el!€ w.m,R.nr<•o.rr,.p•r. E I4,£€ ##,{,!€f,l Ii1t 3 E,i€j,lt i;''°ti' "'3i ,t' ` € mc l'i' € 111€i€€I![j I,tI }!£ t € ilt} i �r— • [:. PI IA} l...:3:1 .ti 5€.?}. tt€Mi .€.I*Re€.t.t .. '� W �€ M1 :+I ello `lY€"; t .[� AS. e €1€€,}ii1Li,7€is€,Aly}£}4€1.t1{F€1iS13j13f',,1 ALLEY LANDSCAPE DATA � �OO2LOo€�oo�• ,�oo�� oc:'tE o 0000�oo{noo'oc INRRIORLANDSCAPEDATA I� ® ryTAL SITE D AA 1e•oi::I[:';:,} 'meet OTAL rAKD AR[ ® TOTAL A REOR LANDSCAPE 7Ta S. TURED OTAL TOO LANDSCAPE AREA MONDCD Jae)SE © / ® TOTAL NTO IOn'11[a RECORD J 1RCES DI0'y m TOTAL NT[MOR TREES FRONDED >TWCCS ?31[ AIlili PERIMETER LANDSCAPE DATA ix t211 © v e If PAVEMENT AREA ADJACENT €1- ADJACENT TO ROW/OTHER MOMS II PIN TOTAL PCRI4CRR tt"l aO+PE+RCA REWIRED t O Sr O•w [N nD� t iiiii 10314E I{RI[TER L MIMED P[AREA MONDCO Sao Y . IR[l/>D V RECAN[D • [C TOTAL TREES REWIRED ;331 r0 a t Y TOTAL TREES MO.SDCD ES RCALE 0 rt YIN.Ms OP R[ttnR[0 r[mN[TER k NTERIOR LANDSCAPE .0111.11.11 111v1Y VINC6 PLANT LIST RiaVio VAt1aoa�'Nisou L uosu i in I" lea v n tar rCRMRFN•N COMMON Nwe NT 'R[•SAa, PLANTED MCA RCWNED Rae "e AArra°.r.r•lra..r. AIme. I a; ' PLANTED ME.MENDED e•Sr Landscape Amar•rAnsa,lpry R,p.,w D•v+ NATIVE PLANT DATA Me ettA°pn"'0111Y101i0R'° R•ibrmnr Nm •' :' ' rrNK PM, �'n aO R 00 AM REa.RRE TRC[S 10 S[NARK S NOT M>ptNw0bptr.sa Pmw0•N M* 1 At ASS M ALL OMLR PLANT MATERIAL To 6C NATIVE Plan CmDrum tiven Cmmr uMCmwm LA W VP i' opts. terf.. Doom w Dom 1o1u R[aURR[D TR[[s TOTES PA Nrbr0r50*0 • TOTAL NARK TREES RCWw[D 7 OtS icpew•s•rwrr ipmwpbAor.'. �vTOTAL NARK mua MONDE 1D iREe NI 11SlooiRawMM •he. IAwAR bPb.ra ' ; > TOTAL R0DIJ*E Stiriue AND aWND COVER AREA t00 s[ JAI .b• a who AN.* P N,1M MEA RCONRCO 'till 6P Lb lIllonpncleds.¢b,ml.irMm uhln.e°° '1 '> ,I TM AREA PRDNDED aI Pe. se f C(00* A 06 NO.�.� PEN ▪ I...,e. Ab.Pre 1J # i� RN Y oils NO reraMm4rM,Yn VOLE CVO NM :Yam M'*A.OI,0n,wr 0 ' 5- n.l wm Ne.� •mbenVom YMIPem 401 r f L-1 of 1 lir UELRAY BEACEI UELRAY BEACEE trail HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD I��IMEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT 1111 1093 1993 20U1 .r-__ ;s..... .. _ ,, z. -z _ _ - 2001 Agent: Andrew Spengler Project Name: North Del-Ida Estates Plat Project Location: Lots 11-16, Block 2, Del-Ida Park ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is the forwarding of a recommendation to the City Commission regarding the proposed plat of North Del-Ida Estates (Lots 11-16, Block 2 of Del-Ida Park). BACKGROUND/PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject property is designated as a part of the Del-Ida Park Historic District and is located on the west side of NE 2nd Avenue, between NE 6th Street and NE 7th Street. The property is zoned Single Family Residential (R-1-AA) and contains a one-story, 2,886 square foot non-contributing structure constructed in 1957 and a 916 square foot garage. The development proposal is to demolish the single family residence with garage and reconfigure the existing six (6) fifty foot wide lots into 4 new lots that will be larger in frontage/width. All lots will be rectangular in shape and contain over 10,000 square feet each. Lots 1 and 2 will be oriented to take access from NE 7th Street and Lots 3 &4 will be oriented to take access from NE 6th Street. No additional right-of-way dedications are necessary. Pedestrian access is provided by an existing 5' wide concrete sidewalk located within NE 7th Street and NE 2nd Avenue rights-of-ways and continues as a 4' wide concrete sidewalk along NE 6th Street right-of-way. A 10' wide utility easement has been requested from Florida Power& Light centered along the rear of Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 so that existing overhead facilities can be extended to serve these new lots. It is recommended that the proposed power line along the rear of these lots be installed underground within the new easement area. PLAT ANALYSIS As referenced above, the development proposal is to replat the existing 6 nonconforming Lots 11-16, Block 2 of Del-Ida Park, into four(4) conforming lots. The existing lots are nonconforming with respect to lot size, width, depth and frontage according to current Single Family Residential (R-1-AA) District Standards. Per LDR Section 4.3.4(E)(3), where a corner lot or through lot has frontage on an arterial or collector street, the front shall be the side with frontage on the arterial or collector. NE 2nd Avenue is considered to be a City Collector, thereby defining the frontage for Lots 2 & 3. Per LDR Section 4.3.4(E)(4); if a limited access easement or limited access right-of-way runs the length of the frontage on a street, then the front of the lot shall be on a frontage without such access restrictions. A limited access easement or Non-Vehicular Access Line will be placed along NE 2nd Avenue; thereby making Lots 2 and 3 frontage NE 7th Street and NE 6th Street. This is attached as a condition of approval. V.A. 4 Historic Preservation Board Staff Report North Del-Ida Estates Plat Page 3 The following table illustrates the required minimum lot size, width, depth and frontage requirements of the R-1-AA Zoning District as per Land Development Regulations Section 4.3.4(K): Lot Size Lot Width I/C* Lot Depth Lot Frontage I/C" (ft-) (ft.) (ft.) Minimum Required 9,500 75/95 100 75/95 Proposed Lot 1 10,204 85 120.06 85 Proposed Lot 2(corner lot) 10,891 91.87 120.06 91.87 Proposed Lot 3(corner lot) 10,900 91.87 120.06 91.87 Proposed Lot 4 10,500 85 120.06 85 * /c-Interior Lot/Comer Lot As highlighted in the table above, proposed Lot 2 and Lot 3 do not meet the current district regulations regarding Lot Width and Lot Frontage for a corner lot. The current lot width for a corner lot is 95 feet and 91.87 feet is proposed. The current lot width for an interior lot is 75 feet and 85 feet is proposed for Lots 1 and 4. The lot width/frontage for Lots 1 and 4 must be reduced by a minimum of 3.13 feet and incorporated with proposed Lots 2 and 3 in order to meet the minimum requirement for a corner lot (91.81' +3.13'=95'). This is attached as a condition of approval. All interior lots contained within the plat of Del-Ida Park were platted as 50'wide lots that ranged in depth from 120' to 140'. The majority of the homes constructed in this neighborhood were developed on 50' to 75' wide lots. The prevailing development patterns in close proximity are residences constructed on 75' or wider lots. Within the same block, there are 4 lots that are 50' in width, 4 lots that are 75' in width and 3 lots that are greater than 75' in width (95', 100' and 145'). All of the new lots will at least meet the zoning districts minimum size (75' to 95') with respect to lot width or lot frontage, but will exceed the minimum lot size. As previously mentioned, a 5' wide concrete sidewalk exists within the rights-of-ways for NE 7th Street and NE 2nd Avenue and continues as a 4' concrete along NE 6th Street right-of-way. It should be noted that the existing 4' wide concrete sidewalk shown on the survey along NE 6th Street must be expanded to a width of 5' along the entire length of proposed Lots 3 and 4 with future development. ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION The proposal to reconfigure 6 existing lots into 4 buildable lots is consistent with the Zoning and Future Land Use Map designation for the subject property. Positive findings can be made with respect to LDR Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings for Land Use and Land Development Applications), Section 3.2.3 (Standards for Site Plan and/or Plat Actions) and Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. It is important to keep in mind that the request before the board is a recommendation for plat approval and not site plan approval. The actual design and layout for the proposed single family homes will be submitted at a later time and will be required to meet strict historic preservation design guidelines to ensure compatibility with respect to design and massing in relation to the surrounding area. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move a recommendation of approval to the City Commission of the request for a Final Plat approval for the plat of North Del-Ida Estates, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained V. A. k Historic Preservation Board Staff Report North Del-Ida Estates Plat Page 4 in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 2.4.5(J) (Major Subdivisions), Section 3.2.3 (Standards for Site Plan and/or Plat Actions) and Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings for Land Use and Land Development Applications) of the Land Development Regulations, subject to conditions. C. Approve the preliminary plat, and require submittal of a final plat to be processed separately. D. Move a recommendation of denial to the City Commission of the request for a Final Plat approval for the plat of North Del-Ida Estates, based upon a failure to make positive findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and failing to make positive findings that the request and approval is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 2.4.5(J) (Major Subdivisions), Section 3.2.3 (Standards for Site Plan and/or Plat Actions) and Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings for Land Use and Land Development Applications) of the Land Development Regulations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Move a recommendation of approval to the City Commission of the request for a Final Plat approval for the plat of North Del-Ida Estates, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 2.4.5(J) (Major Subdivisions), Section 3.2.3 (Standards for Site Plan and/or Plat Actions) and Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings for Land Use and Land Development Applications) of the Land Development Regulations, subject to the following conditions: 1. That a limited access easement or Non-Vehicular Access Line be placed along NE 2nd Avenue; and, 2. That the lot width/frontage for proposed Lots 1 and 4 must be reduced by a minimum of 3.13 feet to be incorporated with proposed Lots 2 and 3 in order to meet the minimum requirement for a corner lot within the R-1-AA Zoning District. Attachments: • Appendix"A" • Location Map • Reduced Survey • Reduced Plat S:'Planning&Zoning\BOARDS\HPB\North Del-Ida Estates Plat\North Del-Ida Estates-Plat.doc V. A. Historic Preservation Board Staff Report North Del-Ida Estates Plat Page 5 A PPEN`DI`X ;A STANDARDS FOR PLAT ACTIONS A. Building design, landscaping, and lighting (glare) shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent B. Separation of different forms of transportation shall be encouraged. This includes pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles in a manner consistent with policies found under Objectives D-1 and D-2 of the Transportation Element. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent C. Open space enhancements as described in Policies found under Objective B-1 of the Open Space and Recreation Element are appropriately addressed. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent D. The City shall evaluate the effect that any street widening or traffic circulation modification may have upon an existing neighborhood. If it is determined that the widening or modification will be detrimental and result in a degradation of the neighborhood, the project shall not be permitted. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent E. Development of vacant land which is zoned for residential purposes shall be planned in a manner which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent F. Vacant property shall be developed in a manner so that the future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; complementary to adjacent land uses; and fulfills remaining land use needs. V. A. ike Historic Preservation Board Staff Report North Del-Ida Estates Plat Page 6 Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent G. Redevelopment and the development of new land shall result in the provision of a variety of housing types which shall continue to accommodate the diverse makeup of the City's demographic profile, and meet the housing needs identified in the Housing Element. This shall be accomplished through the implementation of policies under Objective B-2 of the Housing Element. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent H. The City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent I. Development shall not be approved if traffic associated with such development would create a new high accident location, or exacerbate an existing situation causing it to become a high accident location, without such development taking actions to remedy the accident situation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent J. Tot lots and recreational areas, serving children from toddler to teens, shall be a feature of all new housing developments as part of the design to accommodate households having a range of ages. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential developments located in the downtown area, and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent V. A. %IP \ N.E. 9TH ST. . r N.W. 9TH ST. N N.W. 8TH ST. GEORGE BUSH BOULEVARD IP G•s. % j / QP� &____4< N.E. 7TH ST. Mil N.W. 7TH ST. 11111 LLI i [3fiDoll L. P Q J�� N.W. 6TH ST. \ \\\\ 0 ___—__N / 1 N.E. 6TH ST. MI 17 Lil Cv G 41 •W Q z N.E. 5TH TERR. CtQ ID rn WOOD LN. ' N.E. 5TH CT. i ' rid% ��� oI, ct TRINITY N.E. 5TH ST. Q LUTI-IERAN rt w ICi �.i Z LAKE IDA ROAD N.E. 4TH ST. I I— I I---1 ii 1 - 1 .r—i N • NORTH DEL-IDA ESTATES PLAT CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL EXISTING LOT CONFIGURATION PLANNING Sc ZONING DEPARTMENT \ / -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM778 � I � - . �14 , 1 I(6#B5t1.M1 i, ,N., 5 U E \ cr(BLs�_xP, �' s ` S51/ N. E N. E. 7,�'_H S T R fF E T &IJeANLV. 4 f 5• +11.m9 BE MARK: TOP L +21Ae +21DD �- - 5i2179 �- '' ;RF -SSMH PAVED "I 'ICIn7t7 (LEVATW'+2218 ,IGICI AMtI ry +2(96 +uv +2194 +2185 +2L67 b 3•t LEGEND: q ti • OCT CROSS , 9EF R-C(1r . s 7 E'-CENTERLNE • • S' C O N C. WALK 151,69'SURVEY f t��6 I 1%H CONC.r CONCRETE +221 +a1.0 +220] MIe1•PLAr +22.1 +aw P.R.M.r 4"X 4"CONC.MOM.1ENT STAMPED • $. FR.M.ALB J53" .6 ARC-39.43' W,A-WATER METER C.A.-90'1TI7'SURVEY ' CA-907791YLA7 f I PH-FITE HYDRANT • 250 • LW =WATER VALVE 1 LOT 15 Ii 11 SS.M.H.-SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE P BLOCK 2 v� g I ^'^'SS---- r SANTARY SEWER LIVE gi a.--r.—-CHAN LNC FENCE N �I I —•—•— -OVERHEAD UTCITY LIES N im U LOT 16 14 F 1h ,,tit °� J NV-NVERT BLOCK 2 r -- ——— + p O I +22.18-ELEVATION BASED ON'NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATV4 1929,• J m U ; ( I PALMBEACH COCNTY BENCH MARK SOURCE: CHEROKEE BLONDE" z°'' o FLOOD ZO1E'' X . LOT 14 CARAAiraGEY BLOCK 2 " Lul NOTE: • THERE WERE NO EASEMENTS SHOWN ON TIC RECORD PLAT. ...:4.3„ 7• i� 2,1 *� THE LANDS SHOWN I REON WERE NIDT ABSTRACTED BY ' This OFFICE FOR EASEMENTS,RIGHT OF WAYS OWNERSHSP TT NOTE' OER APROV(L.ENTS 4J OR OTHER NSTRUVENTS OF RECORD. NOT LOCATED. Q W III CERMED TO: ` re hA i � rqI ti1tiAI". & Q i - COASTAL PRO PERTY HOLDINGS,S,LLC,A FLORDA LM TED `• %09 \ •'' zy DELITY FEDERAL RAMC AND TRUST,15ADA ATMA N� _ t` 7 C ADDSON TITLE COMPANY,/vO .B• ( TCOR TITLE NSURANCE COMPANY OF FLOROA�, ,.,..,.. J91' , i m) �. .,'Jf.9' .1rmr7� :N \ t�{ il ' DESCRPTI7.N' .7 +73 2• ^'% LOT 13 Zi LOTS 11 THROUGH 18,NCLUSNf,BLOCK?,DEL-DA PARK, • . BLOCK 2 I ACCORDNG TO THE PLAT THEREOF,AS RECORDED N PLAT N I 1 STORY RESIDENCEI BOOK 9,PAGE 52,PIPLU RECORDS OF PALM BEACH O x I LOT 11 1y B ` COUNTY,FLORIDA.~oo BLOCK 2 + ---- �",---- +- J-1 J7.s I • m � �� i MAY 04 iulh t • VOICE u. a: !: - 7` .6"""' :i.ra-6..., MAP OF BOUNDARY SURVEY RADNS.25.00' 23.0' • • L.L..B9'37S8'PLAT i I HEREBY CERTFY THAT TOSS SURVEY WAS MADE LADER MY RESPONSIBLE CHARGE LOT 12 CA..B9'J7'SJ'SURVEY AND MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS AS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA ARC•3911' 6I BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS N CHAPTER 6.G17-6,FLORIDA 4 BLOCK 2 K AOMALSTRA THE COOS,PURSUANT TO SECTION 471.017,FLORVA STATUTES 0 11 PCA.A.-AS sE PR.M $+a27 1121 +2L6 U7.A5'PLAT +716 i117 WNO 111 ,!H tiK } Yn • I ._. PAUL D. NGLE •—. 2,O �._.—._ E7ARM. —_. _._.—._._._ HD(geLnrabrHu AA z SURVEYOR & MAPPER j 5708 +' CONE. WALK b KHsCO SLR[YOR M Al./(R. • Ki - y „ - +22.06 +12.06 +1189 +7169 +2115 O'BRIEN, SUI TER & O'BRIEN, INC. _• +2210 -_ - +22U _ - +1191 _ --Y.201_ _ _ .206 _ )1, S.SMH LAND SURVEYORS' \- MARK. Tar �� N, E 6TH STRSEET 55I SURVEYOR AND MAPPER IN RESPONSIBLE CERTIFICATE OF TCHARGE: PAUL D.CNGLE Lr NAL&WAS,ER tYS�L4 }I 1;• • I 2601 NORTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY,DELRAY BEACH FLORIDA JJIBJ (L(VA T0v+1211 P A V E O 1 +' • (560 176-1501 732-3179 FAX 176-1390 \ 61T(Of SLRLtr I Isurf, N£6TH 5TREETor 1 NORTH DEL-IDA ESTATES . BEING A REPLAT OF LOTS 11 THROUGH 16, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 2, b DEL-IDA PARK (PLAT 800K 9, PAGE 52, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM N[.»H sr; BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA), BEING IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, SCALE:I•.20' r!! E: . RANGE 43 EAST, CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. + SITE MAY 2005 a a !a eta I� COUNTY OP PALM BEA. ,c.5.,s''"' I STATE OF FLORIOA hh BES act ns aro roe moo LOCATION MAP REVIEWING SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT; ND SCALE t • 70-_".Hi mu 0(CLLRO(0 IL 1 TNS LS TO CERTFY THAT The UDERSGALD PRCFESSCNAL S[RVEYOR AND MAPPER `. DEDICATION FLAT CONTRACT Wf7N NE OTY OF OELRAY BEACH RORCA HAS REVEWED HIS .P}° Pu40V R ACGr.QM o'VW Or MIRTH DEL-GA ESTATES;AS RECCFED BY CHAPTER I7208I(Il i Q, !LOTDA STATUTESW A FTOS THAT li COWPLES MIN ALL TEE REOLFf1RT'TS SE BY OW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS Our COASTAL PROPERTY NXLFE5 CHAPTER 177,PART(RORCA SrATUTCS _ NE, S6PJ67TH STREET— —_ -,__ _ A FLOROA LMTOO LABLIT?CO RANY,oci ER 0•THE LAWS Si0WN —- • '.'''— - )ONCE 1YW: REON BENC A REPEAT N LOTS 1I RR'C,GIL IS N000011 L BLOCKY 2. -CA PARK A T BOOT 9,PAGE 52 q.&C RECORDS OF PALM BEACH ��� E. (N7Y,R000745,BENG N SECTION A TOWNSHF 46 SOUTH RAWE AJ OA TC' • JOIN O WEAVER "• ST.SWAN hEREON AS 9.0RTN DEL-CA ESTATES:BETE M3PE L.e£NSE NO J5.50 q RrOUARLY OES0RDE0 AS FOLLOWS STATE OF ROROA Y OCT APEX TELLER-WEAVER AW SWEETEN,nC. g 15169'S69 xVx: COTS 11 7hROWl IS RCI.1/SM1'E B[OLY Z.Da-CA PART, CERTFCA TE Or AUTIIOR'ZA CON AB J449 LEGEND.' ACCOMAO TO TIE RA T DEREOF AS REC0R0f0 N PLAT 65,Do' 66.{9' Boo!A PALE 52,PIELC RCCOROS OF PALM BEACH SET P.RX f .GENTERLN[ COUJW)"nORCA. . •CONTAITO 13548 SQUARE*FEET Co.OJA ACRES MORE M LOSS' SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: mo.A.PCRMAN(Nr vcarreNc ARD'• .;9.43T mow",(1•YI COUCRn[ K CAUSED TO(SA TO BE SI0VEYED A W PATITO AS STEW'ERECT! TH5 0 TO CERTFY THAT TIE RAT SHOWN NERfON a A TREE AW CORRECT , I 4O ioo. MO7AMCNR STAMPED EILL L B. 0 00 hEREBY 0[CCATE AS FOLLOWS' REPRESENTATION OF A SWVEY WOE LACER MY RESPOV.58(E ORECT.YN AW ca.NN•o'SA'r: C.A.•[CNTRHI ANGLE SIPERMO'THAT SAD SLRA0Y 6 ACCURATE TO TILE BEST OF MY XNOWLEDCE LOTS I Th 00371 A ARE HEREBY RATTED FOR PRIVATE PLRPOSES AS .0 DEW;THAT PEPAUlENT REFERENCE MCVA0ON7S(r.RJA5)AW IACEUENTS Y� C.B. GwnRO R[AP,uL ALLOW£O PURSUANT TO INC RANJKC AW ZONEC REGLLATXWS or ACCCACAO TO SEC 17709Y91 FS NUVf BEEN RACED AS HEOLF(D BY LAW Th£0'T✓or CELRAY BEACH AW ARTIER THAT 71-f SURVEY DATA COEFEES WfTN ALL RECLPEMENTS OF ;!'-‘0,` CHAPTER 177!LOVA STATUTES AS AOEl000 AW TOE•CRCIAWES Cr THE Z yl Wir7ESS...CPO!:RE ABOVE NAMED LMTED LAB(ITY CO•LRANY CITY Cr GEL'RAY BEAD(FLORIDA. (� 5 CAUSES r1ESE PRESENTS TO BE SC✓EO BY ITS MANAGER AW ITS OI U TD L O T I (. Q T 2 Al.TO BE AFFIOLO HERETO BY AND W1TN THE AUTHgWrY or ITS BOAW v g� ORECrORS THS DAY Or PALL O EAGLE Hq fA•QJO!spXKI ARG.aeal SGMK 05 SlAVEYOR AND MAPPER W.5700 0` I rtrr lDK 09[C55 fFn.'LYRE OR LESS COASTAL PROPERTY MXOTC5.LLC, �cYy; O'PREN SUTER.5 O'DAfN M. O ro 2501 WAIN FEDERAL WA-TWAY CELRA✓BEACH FLCROA 1J48J O1 Q Ir TESS' BY; AAG9EW SPEAGLER CCRrfr,ATE O''AUnEAA7A rqv NO.J5.1 N 4 MANAGER `-\"' O W ;1 TESS 19 CITY APPROVAL: $ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: ` 85.00' 9I6T ,e ' •ATE Cr FL LW0A THS RAr or TCRTH OCL-CA ESTATES'A5 APPPGV(0 ON TIE 582.57.1JIT. S69•J771•... wry or Paw BEACH BAY Or ,A.O.2005 BY 77.E GOY commix!! Or THE CITY Or Ll'LRAY BElCH BEFORE ME PERSONALLY APPEAPED ATCREW SFEWLER WW IS PERSONALLY OWN TO ME OR HAS PRODUCED CN IZ OENAN).0fC TFCATEN A EXECUTED rtE ACOCN0 NSIRIAENT A5 MANAGER AnE57' _ COASTAL PROPERTY ACL0nC5 LLD A RCRDA OWED Lawry Co...W. MA rOa Cry CICAM D SEVERALLY AcXWWLE0GE0 r0 AEC BEFORE 0E THAT HE EXECUTED SUCH 7RLMENT AS MANAGER Or SAO(MTED COMPANY,AW THAT TIE SfAL AFFIXED AID AEVEW'FA ACCTPTE0.AW CfRTT[D BY' 7HE FCR(GOrO I+STR(AEN7 6 TEE COWANY SEAL CY SAD CCPAUY AW o.R AT IT WAS AFFIXED TO SAO MTRI.T.IENT BY DIE AW REGC(AR COARANY , 'DEWY,AW THAT SAO n5 TRU.ENT 5THE FREE ACT AIO GEED EF SAD •, AWANY. — • t,� CREC7UT Cr RAMC AID ZO`/.0 CHA P RSOL FA,M.G AW ZO`+G e Z L 0 T e T' 7_( L 0 T,.. 3 `� 61 WfTlESS MY HATO OFFICIAL THS DAY CF O 0 Tp I AH(A.IL700 SCWRE I "6 AREA•57000=K ' OS No; 4 POET a oR LEss 1 6 PLrr.WRf OR LSS . 0 CCdP45S17N EXPRES NOTARY FLUX OTY DETER fRE MARSHAL CY16 NATE. O m0000 . C0wA557N NO: ti '1- NOTES: A ti - 2.3 TITLE CERTIFICATION: .• ALL!FARADS SWWN IEREON ARE R£LArrvE TO The CENTEMIE LEE Or OJ a No.OW AVEHEE HAVNO AN A55LAED BEARY,C Or NO•W 00'C AKRC•3�9.11: • 'ATE OF FCCROA ITA•�•106' (NTAlt Or PALM BEACH WTIOE.' ILLS RAIL AS RECORDED N ITS GRAPhC FORE( HE OFFOA( 1 _ A.1.77453 Y CEP.CFC N O°TIE AMMO LAWS DESCP8E0 h(REN AIO ALL NW CO•SLA•AOJ7'W. A LYlY LCENSED ATTORNEY N THE STATE Cr RW+D4 CRCCA/STANCES BE SUPPLANTED N ABDICATE BY ANY OTTER CRAPS'S OR OCTAL FORA!OF TIF RAT 71fRE MAY BE ACOTO'AL RESTRCTIONS THAT SEr PRX\ T HEREBY CfRTFY THAT!FLIYE EXACTED THE ono TO THE HEREON IYSCRBED PRORRT0^, ARE NOT'RECORCE0 CI OAS RAT THAT MAY BE FOLAD N THE PUBIC RECORDS 1 85.00' 6705' 'A i 1 FIE THE TITLE TO DE PROPERTY IS VESTED TO COASTAL PROPERTY HOUSES LLC or rms COUNTY. • r . I6737M ROR0A[MTED CABL/1Y CCAPANY THAT T E CLRRENT TAXES HAVE BEEN PAR THAT MERE .• E n0 MORTGAGES AEC THAT TER ARE W ENCUAIRANCES Or RfCORO TIE Cry Or CELRAY BEACH 61EREOY GRANTED THE PONT Cr ACCESS FOR eL EAERCEP•CY AW RANTENNCE PLRPoSES ¢ >L TO 08R(E0T(L SUTER R OTIES NSTRETTENi ADREN S PAC.2601 TORTORED BY PALE FE(XRAL IXXWAPY,,OELRAY Y6_ - _ OLP1 YS31W.. _ _�,_ - - - n4✓..S TA 7E OF RORDA GBEA1)Z 5 A RCA JJ`00 —� - N.E. 6TH TREET PERAATA7JT REFERENCE MOMALENTs ARE SHOWN THEE 0 1D}EEFp[(sHA[II,, AV BELONGS OR ANY k7E)OF COTS iR1.C'rON RACED ON UTLTY OP CAMAGE EASEOkNTS consraC7LP/GR LAWS'CAPNC(PG! P f.Y w AANTENANCE CR LAN) VCE ACCESS EA S EAST BEN CdFORAAWE ORE 40 •0 RA�B PN YQ'f�F A I( H4pT • WITN ACL LLLGY.G AW pt/,O 000ES AW/OP MNI0AWES Or THE CRY OF •' Cyr 0 CfLRAY BCALH • 7¢P�_1\.I 0 r�� Y�y 40,1,1Y.0.2....9 `� -'( T. ARC(SILL BOW TREES OR SM.B.S PLACED ON URRY£ASCAENTS WNCH II// 1j I/ VIXD FOR WATER AW SEW{RUSE OP IRON ORA[AGE EASELENTS �1 ,I •1 LAWSCAPNC OV ANY ODER URRYEASEAEM SILL BE ALLOWED 04Y AFTER \ \ COK[T!T Or ALL MITE COLPAKS OCCLPYAC SANE \J/T \ / \_`/ \J/ . • 1 V MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA MEETING DATE: June 1, 2005 LOCATION: City Commission Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Maura Dersh, and Michelle Reich, Jeffrey Silberstein, John Miller, Jr., and Linda Lake MEMBERS ABSENT: Francisco Perez Azua STAFF PRESENT: Warren Adams, Terrill Barton, and Denise Valek I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Vice Chairman Silberstein at 6:00 p.m. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. No one from the Public addressed the Board on non-agenda items. Vice Chairman Silberstein read a summary of the Quasi-Judicial Hearing procedures. The Notary swore in individuals for testimony. I1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Mr. Miller, seconded by Ms. Lake, and passed 6 to 0 to approve the Minutes of May 4, 2005 as written. It was moved by Ms. Schatz, seconded by Ms. Lake, and passed 6 to 0 to approve the Minutes of May 18, 2005 as written. Mr. Silberstein noted that Ms. Randee Schatz's name should be added as being present. III. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS A. 125 NW 3rd Avenue, West Settlers Historic District, Dennis Thompson, Agent Item Before the Board: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the relocation of the existing front entrance and the replaqement of an existing window. (Quasi-Judicial Hearing). Vice Chairman Silberstein asked if there were any ex-parte communications. Mr. Adams entered the project file into the record. The subject property consists of the south 2/3 of Lot 4 and the east 60 feet of the north 41.5 feet of Lot 5, Block 43, Town of Delray, and is located on the east side of NW 3`d Avenue approximately 300 feet south of NW 2"d Street. The property contains a 1,325 square foot, one-story Frame Vernacular dwelling which was constructed in 1917, and a carport which was added in Historic Preservation Board Minutes June 1, 2005 1963. The dwelling is a contributing building within the West Settlers Historic District and is zoned R-1-A (Single Family Residential). Security bars have been added to the front façade which adversely affect the appearance of the dwelling. There have been no recent Board or administrative actions pertaining to this property. The proposed project consists of the relocation of the existing front entrance from the southwest corner to the northwest corner of the front (west)façade, and the replacement of an existing window on the south facade with a smaller window. Associated works include the removal of the existing front steps and the construction of new brick steps at the relocated entrance, the removal of the security bars, and repairs to any damage caused by the removal of the security bars. The removal of historic features should be avoided where possible; however, in this case, the exterior alterations are necessary because of proposed changes to the interior layout of the structure. The new layout will relocate the bathroom to the southwest corner of the dwelling, therefore, the front entrance must be relocated and a smaller window must be installed for privacy. The internal alterations to the layout of the dwelling is being undertaken to meet the owners requirements without the need for an addition to the structure. a The new front entrance will involve minimal removal of historic siding from the structure as it will be inserted into an existing window opening. If possible, the existing front door will be reused in the new entrance; however, if a new door is to be installed, it will be visually compatible as it will be of similar appearance and dimensions to the existing door. The existing door opening will be closed up with siding compatible with the existing. A new single hung window with a one over one light configuration will replace the existing awning window on the south façade to provide light and ventilation to the new bathroom. The installation of a single hung window can be supported as this type of window is consistent with buildings of this style and age, the change in design shows an alteration has taken place, and it will only be visible to people traveling north along NW 3rd Avenue. The locations and dimensions of the historic front entrance and side window recesses will be shown by the retention of the original door and window framing. In conjunction with the above alterations, the security bars will be removed from the windows which will open up the elevations of the dwelling and reinstate its historic appearance.--Any damage caused by the removal of the bars will be appropriately repaired. The proposed alterations can be supported as they will allow the interior of the dwelling to be altered to meet the owner's requirements without the need of an extension, all new features will be compatible with the historic dwelling, the exterior alterations will be clearly visible, and the historic appearance of the dwelling will be reinstated. Therefore positive findings can be made with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(b, c, d, f, g), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Mr. Adams advised that the applicant, Mr. Dennis Thompson, was not present. Vice Chairman Silberstein asked when were the windows replaced on the front. Mr. Adams advised he does not have a record of that. 3 Historic Preservation Board Minutes June 1, 2005 Ms. Schatz asked if there was a reason they are making smaller windows. Mr. Adams advised it was a privacy issue. Ms. Dersh and Mr. Miller felt it looked like a poor repair job. Vice Chairman Silberstein asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Vice Chairman Silberstein closed the Public Hearing. It was moved by Ms. Schatz, seconded by Ms. Dersh, and passed 6 to 0 to move approval of the COA for 125 NW 3`d Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(H), 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8) (b), (c), (d), (f), and (g) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation with the following condition: 1) Provided they do not show where the previous frames on the door or windows were located. B. 321 North Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Rozzo Roofing, Agent Item Before the Board: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the replacement of the existing flat cement roof tiles with concrete roll tiles. Vice Chairman Silberstein asked if there were any ex-parte communications. Mr. Adams entered the project file into the record. The subject property consists of Lots 6 and 7, Block 65, Town of Delray, and is located on the east side of North Swinton Avenue, approximately 250 feet north of NE 3rd Street. The property contains a 2,648 square foot two-story Mediterranean Revival style building which was constructed in 1928. The dwelling is a contributing building within the Old School Square Historic District and is zoned Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD). There have been no recent Board or administrative actions pertaining to this property. The existing cement tiles on the roof have failed and the roof is leaking therefore repairs are required. The Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interiors Standards state that the removal of historic materials is inappropriate and that deteriorated historic features should be repaired where necessary rather than be replaced. Further, the change of color and shape of the roofing material can have an adverse effect on the appearance of the building. In this case; however, it appears as if the existing flat cement tiles may not be the original roof covering as most Mediterranean Revival structures built at this time had a roof covering of terracotta colored barrel tiles. There is no evidence to support this theory; however, the existing roof covering does not look original to the dwelling and the roofing contractor also believes that the dwelling has been re-roofed in the past. The proposal can therefore be supported as there is doubt 4 Historic Preservation Board Minutes June 1, 2005 • over whether the flat cement tiles are original, the proposed tiles are appropriate for the style and age of the dwelling, and the roof requires repairs. While the proposal can be supported, there is some concern regarding the strength of the existing roof structure. It would be prudent for the owner to obtain an engineer's report verifying that the existing roof structure will support the weight of the proposed new tiles. It is also suggested that consideration is given to repainting the building as the paint has been washed-out and is chipped. Based on the above, therefore, positive findings can be made with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(a, b, g, h), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Mr. John Cote, 321 North Swinton Avenue, owner of the property, advised the existing structure should be sufficient to sustain the new roof. Vice Chairman Silberstein asked if there was anyone from the public who,wished to address the Board. There were none. Board discussion ensued regarding the clash of colors between the house and the roof. The house is pink and the roof tiles are red. Mr. Adams advised the color of the roof tiles is burnt mission. Mr. Cote advised that he was shown a pamphlet and the tile was to have an antique patina. He advised he would go through the tiles selection again and pick another color. The Board members did not have a problem with the barrel roof, but with the color. Vice Chairman Silberstein advised the "S" barrel tiles do not depict the period of the house. Mr. Adams advised it was more consistent with a flat gray tile roof. Chairman Silberstein advised the Board that flat tile roofs have been around for one hundred years, and the style should be Mission and not the S Tile. Mr. Cote agreed to utilize the flat tiles. Mr. Adams advised that the Board has approved roof coverings that are not consistent with historic periods. There has to be some form of consistency. There have been approvals in the past. Vice Chairman Silberstein agreed with Mr. Adams. Mr. Cote advised the Board that this house was built by William Ellis, the builder of the Colony Hotel. The Colony has a barrel tile roof. Mr. Cote advised he would check the cost of a barrel tile roof. Vice Chairman Silberstein closed the Public Hearing. 5 Historic Preservation Board Minutes June 1, 2005 First Motion It was moved by Ms. Reich, seconded by Ms. Dersh, and passed 5 to 1 (John Miller voted no) to deny approval .of the COA for 321 North Swinton Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(J), 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8) (a), (b), (g) and (h) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Amended Motion It was moved by Ms. Schatz, seconded by Ms. Lake, and passed 6 to 0 that either a barrel tile or flat concrete roof tile may be utilized and the choice and color selection can be approved administratively. C. 19 South Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Swinton Venture, LLC Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of aluminum frame doors and windows. Vice Chairman Silberstein asked if there were any ex-parte communications. Mr. Adams entered the project file into the record. The 0.15 acre subject property consists of Lot 9, Block 69, Town of Delray. The property, which is located on the east side of South Swinton Avenue, approximately 256' south of Atlantic Avenue, is considered a contributing property within the Old School Square Historic District. The property contains a one-story vernacular structure constructed in 1940 as a single-family residence. The structure is of reinforced masonry and wood construction on a concrete foundation. The roof is asphalt shingle and aluminum awning windows have replaced the original wood frame windows. Two non-contributing one-story additions have been constructed on the east elevation of the structure. The first addition, built in 1967, consists of a flat roof, while the second addition, built in 1975, consists of a gable roof and a flat-roofed covered porch. At its meeting of April 2, 1997, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) approved a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA 8-301), site plan, landscape plan, architectural elevations, and waiver requests associated with the conversion of the single-family residence to a hair salon. The development proposal consisted of the conversion of the original contributing 878 square foot single-family residence to a hair salon; the enclosure of the 214 square foot carport on the nprth side of the dwelling to accommodate additional salon floor area (1,042 square feet total); the removal of the front driveway; and the installation of a four (4) parking spaces backing onto the alley at the rear of the property. The aforementioned non-contributing additions (consisting of 641 square feet) were to be utilized for storage and as an efficiency dwelling unit. The improvements associated with the conversion were completed in June of 1999. At its meeting of October 6, 2004, the HPB approved a Class II Site Plan Modification, landscape plan and design elements for the conversion of the existing hair salon to an office, the demolition of a non-contributing 641 square foot addition at the rear of the 6 Historic Preservation Board Minutes June 1, 2005 structure and the existing four (4) parking spaces, and construction of a six (6) space single-loaded parking area, subject to conditions. The following waiver requests were also approved: ■ A waiver to reduce the minimum required stacking distance between the alley right- of-way and the first parking space within the parking lot from five feet (5') to four feet (4'). ■ A waiver to reduce the width of the terminal landscape island at the east side of the parking tier from five feet (5')to two feet-six inches(3'-6"). • A waiver to reduce the width of the landscape barrier between the parking area and the property to the north from five feet (5') to two feet-six inches (2'-6"). ■ A waiver to reduce the width of the terminal landscape island at the west side of the parking tier from five feet (5')to one foot (1'). On April 16, 2005, administrative approval was given for the replacement of the asphalt roofing shingles. The current proposal is for the removal of the aluminum awning and vinyl frame windows from all elevations, and installation of aluminum frame doors and windows. The following is suggested by the Delray Beach Design Guidelines regarding: Retain distinctive windows which feature a sash, muntins, glazing, sills, heads, hood molds, paneled, or decorative doors jambs and moldings and shutters and blinds. Changing the historic appearance through inappropriate design materials or adding a finish or color that changes the sash, depth of reveal, the reflectivity, or the appearance of the frame should be avoided. Replacing viable windows rather than maintaining the original should be avoided. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation suggest the following: The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. The current proposal is for the removal of the aluminum awning and vinyl frame windows and installation of single hung aluminum frame windows with a six over six light configuration and aluminum doors with glazed panels on all elevations. The proposed glazing will be of impact resistant glass. Repairing the existing windows or replacing them with an identical design would be the most appropriate methods for repairing this building according to the LDRs, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation; however, all of the original wood frame windows have been removed from the structure. The existing windows are a mixture of aluminum frame awning windows, which are in 7 Historic Preservation Board Minutes June 1, 2005 poor repair, single hung plastic frame windows with faux glazing bars to give the impression of having a six over six light configuration, and PGT windows. Both of the original doors have also been replaced. The front(west) door is constructed of wood and has nine glazed panels and the rear (east) door is constructed of wood and is plain in appearance. As the original windows have been removed and the existing windows are of different designs and in poor repair, replacing them would improve the overall appearance of the structure. The proposed single hung six over six windows are consistent with a building of this style and age, and the use of impact resistant glass will remove the need for the installation of other forms of storm protection. The proposal can therefore be supported. However, in keeping with recent HPB approvals, a condition of approval is that the window frames to the front (west) façade of the structure (that are visible from the public right-of-way) should be of aluminum clad wood. Also, two further conditions of approval are that clear glass is used in the windows and that the proposed muntin profile is approved by the HPB. The proposed installation of aluminum frame 'Outswing French Doors' can also be supported as doors with glazed panels are in keeping with a property of this age and style. The proposed light configuration of the new doors is riot specified in the application; however, if details are not submitted at the HPB meeting, they can be reviewed administratively (in accordance with the Design Guidelines). The doors and windows will be manufactured by the same company and will therefore complement each other in appearance and the muntins on the glazed section of the door will match the profile of those approved for the windows. This has been attached as a condition of approval. Based on the analysis above, positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8)(c) and (g), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation can be made, subject to conditions. Mr. Graham Hutchinson, representing the owner of the property, presented a sample of the aluminum clad window to the Board, and advised it looked exactly the same as aluminum clad wood window. We are presently improving the interior of the house, and have treated this property for the past six months for termites. This house has suffered from lack of maintenance, and the wood windows will not last as long as the aluminum clad ones. Presently the house has four different types of windows. The report states that the front door is wood, however, the door is not original to the house it is a hollow metal door. If we install aluminum clad windows they could be delivered in three to four weeks. We would like the windows installed as quickly as possible. Vice Chairman Silberstein asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Board discussion ensued and it was their consensus that aluminum wood clad windows should be utilized. Vice Chairman Silberstein closed the Public Hearing. 8 Historic Preservation Board Minutes June 1, 2005 It was moved by Ms. Lake, seconded by Ms. Reich, and passed 6 to 0 to move approval of the COA for 19 South Swinton Avenue by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(c) and (g) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: 1) That the window frames to the front (west) façade of the structure (that are visible from the public right-of-way) should be of aluminum clad wood; 2) That clear glass is used in the windows; 3) That the proposed muntin profile is approved by the HPB; 4) That the muntins on the glazed section of the door match the profile of those approved for the windows and finish. D. 33 Palm Square, Marina Historic District, Gary Rice Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for a change of exterior paint color. Vice Chairman Silberstein asked if there were any ex-parte communications. Mr. Adams entered the project file into the record. The subject property consists of Unrec Lots 61 and 62 in OR1182P32 and the north 12.5 feet of the parcel lying south of and adjacent to Lot 62, Palm Square, and is situated on the east side of Palm Square approximately 280 feet south of Atlantic Avenue. The property consists of a 1,024 square foot, one-story dwelling and a 682 square foot, one-story guest cottage. Both structures are of cbs construction and were constructed in 1938 in the Minimal Traditional Style and are considered as being contributing structures within the Marina Historic District. The property is zoned RM (Multiple Family Residential). There are no recent administrative or Board actions pertaining to this property. The current proposal is for the installation of brick pavers, tree pruning, landscaping, and a change of exterior paint color. The current proposal is for the installation of brick pavers, tree pruning, landscaping, and a change of exterior paint color. This work has already been completed and the applicant has now submitted a COA for HPB consideration. The applicant has stated that the alterations were necessary because of hurricane damage to the property. Pavers: The driveway and walkways to the house and cottage were previously surfaced with asphalt; however, the applicant has stated that this was in poor condition and needed to be replaced. In accordance with the Design Guidelines, decorative pavers may be used for driveways and walkways in historic properties. The pavers also enhance the landscaping and allow rainwater to drain. The installation of the pavers can therefore be supported. 9 Historic Preservation Board Minutes • June 1, 2005 Landscaping: The applicant has stated that the garden shrubs and two trees to the front (west) of the property were damaged by hurricanes. Many new shrubs and plants have been introduced into the garden and the two trees were heavily pruned. Concern was raised by the landscape inspector as a Landscape Permit Application and a Tree, Scrub & Vegetation Removal Application were not submitted. Concerns were also raised as to the extent of the pruning of the two trees and whether they will survive. The landscape inspector has stated that the two trees may need to be replaced.A landscape plan which meets the requirements of LDR Section 4.6.16 and drawn by a registered landscape architect must be submitted. The plan should include a table of the Landscape Data. Exterior Painting: The Design Guidelines recognize that the choice of paint color for the exterior of a historic property is a combination of personal taste and, in historic districts, consideration as to how that paint color will affect the character of the neighborhood. While the chosen colors may be well suited for a house situated within a district of Bahamian-style properties the overall scheme is out of context with the other dwellings in the surrounding area. It is suggested, therefore that the applicant submits alternative choices of paint colors and schemes to the HPB for approval. To reduce the,amount of repainting, the color chosen for the main body of the house could be retained while the blue used for the trim and shutters, and the pink and red used for the window frames and doors could be altered. When choosing colors for a historic building, consideration should be given to the age of the property, the color of the roof and other building elements, and the color of the surrounding buildings. Simpler structures require fewer colors and, to avoid disharmony,. consideration should be given to staying within a single color family and using differing shades to create subtle rather than extreme contrasts. It is also worth remembering that dark colors are more likely to fade and can be difficult to touch up. Vice Chairman Silberstein asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Mr. Richard Robb, 50 Palm Square, advised he has lived across the street from Mr. Rice's home, and the color blue they painted the house is refreshing and pretty. This is a wonderful home and what they have done to it is magnificent. Ms. Dersh advised there is no landscape plan in place. Mr. Adams advised the landscape plan will be dealt with administratively. Ms. Reich advised the house is adorable, but the color scheme is overbearing. Mr. Rice, 33 Palm Square, agrees with everything, and when we purchased the property it was being used for commercial use. He suggested that any real estate agent who shows a property should advise the buyer that the home is in a historic district. Ms. Lake advised she does not think the house speaks of a Delray Beach historic property the way it appears. Vice Chairman Silberstein asked Mr. Rice if he would consider making a recommendation for the colors. 10 Historic Preservation Board Minutes June 1, 2005 Board discussion ensued regarding the bold color scheme, and that it should be toned down. Mr. Adams advised that the house was a white body with green shutters prior to Mr. Rice purchasing the property. Mr. Rice advised he would keep within the City's guidelines pertaining to a historic property. Vice Chairman Silberstein closed the Public Hearing. It was moved by Ms. Lake, seconded by Mr. Miller, and passed 6 to 0 to continue with direction in regard to the color scheme and landscape plan. E. 139 NW 5th Avenue, West Settlers Historic District, Struc. Tech. Engineering, Inc. Agent Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class III Site Plan for an addition to commercial premises. Vice Chairman Silberstein asked if there were any ex-parte communications Mr. Adams entered the project file into the record. The subject property consists of Lot 2, Resubdivision of Block 27, is zoned Central Business District (CBD) and is within the West Settlers Historic District. The property contains a 3,413 square foot commercial building with six (6) back-out parking spaces on NW 5th Avenue and another four (4) back-out parking spaces on Martin Luther King Junior Boulevard (NW 2nd Street). The structure is a simple, unadorned concrete block.rectangular building, constructed in 1951 and is considered non-contributing. On September 5, 2001, the HPB denied an application to allow signage installed on the building to remain. The signage had been installed prior to receiving a permit. The HPB denied the application as it felt the sign should have more character in keeping with the District. On December 1, 2004, an application for the review of a Conceptual Plan for alterations to the property was submitted to the HPB. The proposal included the construction of a 1,509 square foot addition at the rear of the existing commercial building, the construction of ten (10) back-out parking spaces on the adjoining alley, the construction of a refuse enclosure adjacent to Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard (NW 2nd Street), the elimination of the six (6) back-out parking spaces along NW 5th Avenue, and changes to the architectural elevations of the existing building. The development proposal also included the installation of a handicap accessible parallel parking space along Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard (NW 2"d Street) and four (4) standard parallel parking spaces along NW 5th Avenue. The parking spaces within the adjacent rights-of-way are associated with the NW 5th Avenue streetscape improvements. The HPB reviewed the proposal and their comments were forwarded to the applicant to amend the proposal. The Board's comments primarily consisted of relocating the 1,509 square foot addition from the rear of the property to the front in accordance with the adopted Downtown Delray Beach Master Plan and provide significant changes to the elevations so they are complimentary and harmonious with the area. 11 Historic Preservation Board Minutes June 1, 2005 The applicant is now before the Board for consideration of a Class III site plan for an addition and exterior alterations to the structure. The development proposal involves the following: • A 285 square foot addition to the rear of the structure, which involves closure of an existing roof area; • External alterations and improvements to the structure; • Removal of the six (6) back-out parking spaces in front of (west) of the building and installation of paver blocks; • Modifications to the four (4) back-out parking spaces on Martin Luther King Junior Boulevard (NW 2nd Street) to accommodate five (5) spaces, and the addition of ten (10) back-out parking spaces to the rear(east) of the property; • Installation of a dumpster enclosure and associated landscaping. It is noted that as part of the NW/SW 5th Avenue improvements, the Community Redevelopment Agency will be constructing the parallel parking space on Martin Luther King Junior Boulevard (NW 2nd Street), the alley along the east side of the property as well as the back-out parking spaces for this property and other properties with parking adjacent to the alley. At its meeting of April 14, 2005, the Community Redevelopment Agency Board (CRA) reviewed and recommended approval of the site plan modification as proposed. At its meeting of April 13, 2005, the- West Atlantic Redevelopment Coalition Board (WARC) reviewed and recommended approval of the site plan modification as proposed. The development proposal involves a 285 square foot addition to a commercial building, exterior improvements to the building, car parking improvements, and associated landscaping. The improvements to the property are appropriate for the West Settlers Historic District and will improve a currently run-down building which is situated on a prominent location. The proposal will be consistent with LDR Sections 3.1.1, 2.4.5(G)(5), 4.4.13, 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(a-k), and 4.6.16, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan when the conditions of approval are addressed. Mr. Mike Hammad, owner of the building, advised that he has been working with Ms. -- Rosalind Murray of the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) for four years regarding parking improvements to the building. The CRA will be funding removal of the back out and will be adding parking in the alley, and well as landscaping associated with that. Vice Chairman Silberstein asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Vice Chairman Silberstein asked Mr. Hammad what was the reason for the pavers on Fifth? Ms. Murray advised that Mr. Hammad designed the pavers for the front of the building. The pavers would be superimposed, and the CRA is funding it. 12 Historic Preservation Board Minutes June 1, 2005 Vice.Chairman Silberstein closed the Public Hearing. Ms. Lake inquired what streetscape, sidewalk, lighting, and landscaping improvements would be made to the property. Ms. Murray advised that an artist is designing the concrete sidewalk and a terrazzo installer will use flexible rubber to make a design on tope of the cement. Mr. Adams advised he did not know about this till last week. Ms. Murray advised it was being coordinated by the City Engineer's Office and the CRA is paying for it. Mr. Adams advised Ms. Murray they are only here to discuss the alterations and improvements to the building. Ms. Barton advised that this is part of the great scheme of the West Settler's area. If the landscape plan, and design elements might have to come back to the Board it will. Board discussion ensued regarding the colors of the building', lines for the air conditioning, and the installation of more landscaping. Mr. Adams advised that the dedication agreement would be coming from Mr. Hammad. Ms. Murray advised they will create a dedication and easement agreement. Site Plan Modification It was moved by Ms. Dersh, seconded by Mr. Miller, and approved 6 to 0 to move approval of the COA request and associated Class III site plan modification for Hammad Shoppes Delray (139 NW 5th Avenue), by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 3.1.1 and 2.4.5(G)(5) of the Land Development Regulations and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, subject to the following conditions: 1) That revised plans are submitted (3 sets) addressing all Site Plan Technical Items and conditions of approval. 2) That the paint chips are approved as submitted. 3) That the elevations are revised and a roof plan provided which show the location of the roof mounted equipment and the method of screening. Landscape Plan It was moved by Ms. Dersh, seconded by Ms. Schatz, and approved 6 to 0 to move approval of the COA request and associated Landscape Plan for Hammad Shoppes Delray (139 NW 5th Avenue), by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the 13 Historic Preservation Board Minutes ' June 1, 2005 Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 4.6.16 of the Land Development Regulations, subject to the following conditions: 1) That revised plans are submitted (3 sets) addressing all Landscape Plan Technical Items and conditions of approval. 2) That additional landscape features and/or planters are provided within the paver area west of the building to soften the appearance Design Elements It was moved by Mr. Miller, seconded by Ms. Schatz, and approved 6 to 0 to move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness and the associated design elements for Hammad Shoppes Delray (139 NW 5th Avenue), by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, and the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines,‘subject to the following conditions: 1) That a five foot (5') right-of-way dedication is made for SE 1st Avenue and the right-of-way deed is accepted by the City Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. 2) That a four foot (4') right-of-way dedication is made for the alley to the rear (east) of the property and the right-of-way deed is accepted by the City Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) That the proposed additional (easternmost) back-out parking space onto Martin Luther King Junior Boulevard (NW 2"d Street) is eliminated from the proposal. 4) That a minimum distance of 42' is provided from the eastern edge of the rear alley to the front of the back-out parking spaces along the alley. 5) That details of all proposed and required site lighting are submitted. 6) That a photometric plan is submitted. F. House of Vintage (123 South Swinton Avenue), Old School Square Historic District, Jeffrey Silberstein, Agent. Mr. Silberstein stepped down. Vice Chairman Schatz asked if there were any ex-parte communications. Item Before the Board: Consideration of the revised Design Elements for House of Vintage. At its meeting of April 20, 2005, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) reviewed a Class IV Site Plan Modification for the addition of a 3-story residential addition to the rear of the extant historic structure. 14 Historic Preservation Board Minutes June 1, 2005 y The development proposal includes the following: ■ Construction of a 1,882 sq. ft. 3 story residential addition to the rear of the building and demolition of the existing single-loaded four(4) space parking lot; ■ Construction of a four (4) space back-out parking lot on to the alley including one handicapped accessible space; and, • Installation of associated landscaping and relocation of the trash receptacles to the south side of the building. The Staff Report raised a number of concerns regarding the proposal and recommended that, if approved, the approval would be subject to the following conditions: 1) That the third floor area is limited to 50% of the second floor area. 2) That the third floor setbacks or planes of the façade are offset and varied to provide visual relief. 3) That a photometric plan is submitted which complies with the illumination standards of Section 4.6.8 of the LDRs. It is noted the light fxtures must be decorative. 4) That the parking space and alley have a combined minimum depth of 42'. 5) That all plans are consistent with each other. 6) That the plans indicate the improvements within the alley which include the paved alley and the 2'valley gutter 7) That revised plans are submitted addressing the Site and Engineering Plan Technical Items as indicated in the staff report, and the listed conditions. 8) That window and door specifications are submitted. 9) The proposed use of the loft area is clarified on the drawings. 10) That the applicant ensures that the palm to be planted adjacent to the east building elevation will not be in conflict with the overhang of the building. 11) That the designs of the building elevations are altered to provide visual compatibility with the historic buildings within the historic district. The applicant advised he was in agreement with the first ten (10) conditions listed in the Staff Report; however, he believed that the design of the building was appropriate for the Old School Square Historic Arts District. With regard to condition 11, and after discussion, the HPB tabled the motion pending further information from the client regarding the following issues: 1) Reduce the scale. 2) Offset the north elevation. 3) Change the profile of the roof. 4) Doors and windows should be vertical. 15 Historic Preservation Board Minutes ►4 June 1, 2005 The applicant has submitted architectural elevations for the development that have been revised to address staff conditions 1, 8, and 10. With regard to staff condition number 11 and the HPB's comments, the applicant has stated: "The elevations have been altered. The footprint has remained the same for the first and second floor. The third floor footprint is the same but has been flipped to the south side. The building height has been reduced by 2'-4". By flipping the third floor this softened the "walled" effect on the north side. On the south side the addition is separated from the house by 10' of landscaping. On the south side the planes of the facades are offset and varied providing visual relief. We did look at hip or shed roof configuration but this only drew more attention to the design. The intent is to make the addition "disappear'from the west elevation view". These items are now before the Board for review. Based on the issues in the Staff Report raised by the HPB with regard to staff condition 11 have not been addressed. The proposed addition does not conform with the requirements of LDR Sections 4.5.1(8)(a), (c), (h) and (j), the Design Guidelines or the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. The proposed addition cannot therefore be supported as: ■ The proposed addition dominates the extant historic structure (mainly because of the proposed height and the lack of features on its west elevation). ■ The applicant is attempting to introduce a new style of architecture to the existing building which, according to the Design Guidelines, should not be done. ■ The applicant has failed to address the issues raised by the HPB. If the client wishes a contemporary addition with a flat roof, this may be achieved by removing the third floor as the addition would be not be visible from the main public right- of-way (South Swinton Avenue). It should be noted that many of the above conditions and issues could be addressed by simply removing the proposed third floor of the addition. This would achieve the required reduction in scale, would remove the need for offsets on the north elevation, and would allow the installation of a flat roof. Also, although the Design Guidelines state that a new architectural style should not be introduced, it would be easier to support a contemporary addition it was not visible from the public right-of-way. Based on the above, therefore, the proposed addition fails to comply with the majority of the design requirements set out in the LDRs, the Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and is therefore not consistent with Section 3.1.1 and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. As further amendments are required, the item should be postponed with direction. Mr. Jeffrey Silberstein, Architect, representing the applicant, advised that some of the Board members were not present at the last meeting when this was brought up. The Board felt the design was compatible and the size and height of the building could be reduced by a few feet. We discussed an example of architecture and some members did not have an opportunity to review that. They should be given the opportunity now. We were able to reduce the height of the building by 2 feet 4 inches. When we changed the 16 Historic Preservation Board Minutes June 1, 2005 #t profile for a hip roof it called more attention to the project. If you have a hip roof you are higher at the peak than with a flat roof. Doing that would negate what we are trying to accomplish. The side elevation is delineated by a small area that are the stairs to the apartment. It is offset from the building. We flipped it so there would be an offset on the second floor by flipping the loft area. This had an offset on the north and the south side. It is important to realize by keeping the west facade solid attention is not called to it. Vice Chairman Schatz closed the Public Hearing. The Board recommended we keep the addition the same color which we will. The reason for the horizontal windows: One is in the bathroom where privacy is needed, and the other is in the kitchen to provide light in the space. We have also reduced the mass of the building. Vice Chairman Schatz asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Mr. Adams advised it is a new type of architecture being introduced and the Guidelines state that this should not be done. Mr. Miller advised he was not present at the last meeting, however, I looked at the drawings that Mr. Silberstein is presenting and do not think this fits in with the area. It should be possible to get the same square footage and expand it out with another design. Mr. Silberstein advised that the building is only 1,400 sq. ft. and the loft area is only 300 sq. ft. The LDR's were changed and we voted on that to reduce the third floor to half the size of the second floor and that is what this design accomplishes. Ms. Schatz asked Mr. Adams if he was still opposed to this. Mr. Adams advised he did not have anything against the new design but in the historic district, however, it would be a better fit in the Marina district. I have a problem putting a two story modern addition on this store. I feel it is not in line for that area of Swinton Avenue. Board discussion ensued that a three story addition to this building was not compatible with the area, and the style should be compatible with the existing structure and only be two stories. It was moved by Ms. Dersh, seconded by Mr. Miller, and approved 5 to 0 (Mr. Silberstein stepped down to postpone with direction in regard to the following items: 1) Height of the addition, and 2) Style of the addition IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments: None B. Report from Historic District Representatives: None 17 Historic Preservation Board Minutes of June 1, 2005 C. Board Members: None D. Staff: None VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Board made a motion to adjourn at 8:50 p.m. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for May 18, 2005 and was formally adopted and approved by the Board on Denise A. Valek If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. 18