The URL can be used to link to this page

HPB 06-01-05 AGENDA t► HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH qY Meeting Date: June 1, 2005 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: City Commission Chambers Time: 6:00 P.M. The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service,program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Randolph at 243-7127(voice), or 243-7199(TDD), 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing,such persons will need a record of these proceedings,and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Two or more City Commissioners may be in attendance. I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • May 4 2005 and May 18, 2005 III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. 125 NW 3`d Avenue,West Settlers Historic District, Dennis Thompson, Agent Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the relocation of the existing front entrance and the replacement of an existing window. B. 321 North Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Rozzo Roofing, Agent Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the replacement of the existing flat cement roof tiles with concrete roll tiles. C. 19 South Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Swinton Venture, LLC Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of aluminum frame doors and windows. D. 33 Palm Square, Marina Historic District, Gary Rice Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for a change of exterior paint color. E. 139 NW 5th Avenue West Settlers Historic District, Struc. Tech. Engineering, Inc., Agent Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class 111 Site Plan for an addition to commercial premises. F. House of Vintage(123 South Swinton Avenue), Old School Square Historic District, Jeffrey Silberstein, Agent Consideration of revised Design Elements. IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS • Public Comments • Reports from Historic District Representatives • Board Members • Staff V. ADJOURN Posted on May 27,2005 Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner y MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA MEETING DATE: May 4, 2005 LOCATION: City Commission Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Francisco Perez-Azua, Maura Dersh, Jeffrey Silberstein, John Miller, Jr., Linda Lake, Randee Schatz, and Michelle Reich MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Warren Adams, Terrill Barton, and Denise Valek I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Perez at 6:00 p.m. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. No one from the Public addressed the Board on non-agenda items. Chairman Perez read a summary of the Quasi-Judicial Hearing procedures. The Notary swore in individuals for testimony. II. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS A. 98 NW 5th Avenue, West Settlers Historic District, Zarus Wright, Agent Item Before the Board: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the replacement of an existing gray tile roof with a tan shingle roof. (Quasi-Judicial Hearing). Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. There were none. Mr. Adams entered the project file into the record. The subject property consists of the north 50 feet of the east 135 feet of Block 20, Town of Delray and is located on the southwest corner of NW 5th Avenue and NW 1st Street. The two story apartment building was built in 1972 in a modern style and is of CBS construction with a flat cement tile roof. The 7,076 square foot structure contains garages on the first floor and apartments on the second floor, and is a non-contributing structure within the West Settlers Historic District. The property is currently zoned Central Business District(CBD). There have been no recent Board or administrative actions pertaining to this property. The current proposal is for the replacement of the existing gray cement roof tiles with tan dimensional asphalt shingles. While re-roofing utilizing similar materials associated with r Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 4, 2005 repair or replacement is typically reviewed and approved administratively, the replacement of a roof with new materials requires Board approval. The current proposal is for the replacement of the gray roof tiles with tan colored dimensional asphalt shingles. The Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards state that the removal of historic materials should be avoided and that, if features have to be removed completely, the new features should match the old in design, color, texture, other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. In this case the tiles will be completely removed and replaced with shingles which are not a match in terms of design, color, texture or materials. However, the structure is 33 years old, is a non-contributing building, and requires roof repairs. The shingles do not match the tiles; however, the proposal can be approved as shingles are an appropriate roof covering for buildings of this age and style. As the proposed roof material will consist of dimensional shingles rather than flat shingles, the proposed changes can be supported. Also, there are many other buildings within the West Settlers Historic District with shingle roofs, therefore, the proposal is in accordance with LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8) which states that all improvements to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a historic district shall be visually compatible. Based on the above analysis, therefore, positive findings can be made with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), and 4.5.1(E)(8), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing. It was moved by Mr. Silberstein, seconded by Ms. Schatz, and approved 6 to 0 (Ms. Dersh arrived late) to move approval of the COA for 98 NW 5th Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(H), 4.5.1(E)(4), and 4.5.1(E)(8) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. B. 134 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic Arts District, Robert Currie, Owner Item Before the Board: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the replacement of an existing wood picket fence with a new vinyl picket fence. (Quasi- Judicial Hearing). Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. There were none. Mr. Adams entered the project file into the record. The subject property consists of Lot 12 (Less the East 5 Feet of NE 1st Avenue Right-of-Way), Block 67, Town of Delray and is located on the west side of NE 1st Avenue, between NE 1st Street and NE 2"d Street. The single story structure was built in 1935 in the Vernacular style, and is typical of the many small cottages built for use as winter homes during the 1930s. The building is a 2 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 4, 2005 contributing structure within the Old School Square Historic District and is zoned OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District). In November, 1994, the Historic Preservation Board approved, subject to conditions, the Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Design Elements associated with a mixed-use development consisting of offices and a residence. The proposal included the conversion of the 736 square foot historic structure to offices; an 847 square foot office addition and a 449 square foot apartment; the addition of 6 parking spaces; and, associated landscaping. An associated waiver to allow parking in the front yard was also approved. In December, 1994, the City Commission approved an associated waiver to reduce the required five (5)foot perimeter landscape area to two (2) feet. In March, 2005, administrative approval was given for the replacement of the roof shingles. The current proposal is for the replacement of the existing 2.5' high wood picket fence with a new 3' high white vinyl picket fence along the east side (front) of the property and the east 17.5' (approximately) of the north property line. Fences, walls, and gates are typically reviewed and approved administratively; however, the proposal involves the introduction of a modern material and Board approval is required. The current proposal is for the replacement of the existing wood picket fence with a new white vinyl picket fence. As the photographs show, the extant wood fence is in poor condition. In accordance with the Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards, the existing fence should be retained and repaired as necessary through the replacement of those pickets and rails which have deteriorated badly. If the fence is beyond repair, it should be replaced with a new fence which matches the existing in terms of design, color, texture, other visual qualities, and material. The current proposal is for the replacement of the fence along the front (east) boundary of the property and for partial replacement along the north boundary, both of which are visible from the public right-of-way. During a survey of the other properties in this section of NE 1st Avenue, it was noted that, in all cases where a property has a boundary fence, they are made of wood. LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8) states that all improvements to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. A vinyl fence is not an appropriate addition to a building of this style and age, especially when the structure is contributing. • It-has-been argued that vinyl fences require less maintenance than wood fences, that - - they retain their appearance for longer, and that they last longer. While it is true they require less maintenance, they can be susceptible to yellowing and cracking and, as they are a relatively new innovation, there is no proof as to how long they will last. If a wood fence is properly maintained and painted regularly, it can last 50 years or more depending on the type of wood used, where it is installed, and whether or not it has been treated with a preservative to help resist decay, fungi and insects. The Design Guidelines state that new materials, some of them synthetic, may be approved on a case-by-case basis; however, it is_recommended that vinyl fences are only approved for locations where they cannot be viewed from the public right-of-way or where their location makes maintenance difficult. Approving the installation of a vinyl fence where it can be viewed from the public right-of-way could set a precedent and lead to a flood of similar applications. 3 i Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 4, 2005 On September 5, 2001, a COA was submitted for Board approval for the installation of a vinyl fence at 1104 Nassau Street, a contributing property in the Nassau Street Historic District. The COA was continued until the Board meeting of September 19, 2001 to allow the Board to view a sample of the proposed fencing prior to making a decision. Board approval was given; however, in this case, the fence was located at the farthermost portion of the property, away from the view of other property owners and public rights-of- way, in an area that was heavily landscaped. The portion of the fence facing Nassau Street was constructed of wood, thus maintaining the desired appearance where visible. Based on the above analysis, therefore, positive findings cannot be made with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Mr. Jose Aguila, Architect with Currie, Sowards, Aguila Architects, advised they are withdrawing their Certificate of Appropriateness and will be installing wood fencing. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing. III. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS A. The Sewell C. Biggs House (212 Seabreeze Avenue), Erskine Courtenay, Owner Item Before the Board: Consideration of the designation of an individually listed property in the Local Register of Historic Places and set a date for the Public Hearing. Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. Ms. Lake advised she spoke with Virginia Courtney that she was going to undertake this. Mr. Adams advised the owner has proposed to designate the subject property to the Local Register of Historic Places and has employed the services of Dorothy W. Patterson to undertake the research and prepare the designation report. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(1), to qualify as a historic site the property must fulfill one or more of the criteria set forth in LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(2) 'and/or (3). The designation report contaic, at minimum, sufficient information to meet the criteria stated in both LDR Sections 4.5.1(B)(2) and (3). The criteria are as follows: LDR Section 4.5.1(B) (2): (a) Is associated in a significant way with the life or activities of a major person important in city, state, or national history (for example, the homestead of a local founding family); (b) Is the site of a historic event with significant effect upon the city, state, or nation; (c) Is associated in a significant way with a major historic event, whether cultural, economic, social, military, or political; 4 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 4, 2005 (d) Exemplifies the historical, political, cultural, economic, or social trends of the community in history; or (e) Is associated in a significant way with a past or continuing institution which has contributed substantially to the life of the city. LDR Section 4.5.1(B) (3): (a) Portrays the environment in an era of history characterized by one or more distinctive architectural styles; and, (b) Embodies those distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, period, or method of construction; (c) Is a historic or outstanding work of a prominent architect, designer, landscape architect, or builder; or (d) Contains elements of design, detail, material, or craftsmanship of outstanding quality or which represented, in its time, a significant innovation or adaptation to the South Florida environment. The designation report demonstrates that the subject property qualifies as a historic site as it: is associated in a significant way with the life or activities of a major person important in city, state, or national history [LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(2)(a)]; embodies those distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, period, or method of construction [LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(3)(b)]; is a historic or outstanding work of a prominent architect, designer, landscape architect, or builder [LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(3)(c)]; and contains elements of design, detail, material, or craftsmanship of outstanding quality or which represented, in its time, a significant innovation or adaptation to the South Florida environment [LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(3)(d)]. Sewell C. Biggs, a northern Delaware native, graduated from the University of Delaware in 1938. He also attended the University of Virginia Law School, and studied architecture at Harvard, Oxford, and Cambridge Universities. He became a serious collector of 18th and 19th-century American art and, in 1988, the Biggs Museum of American Art opened in Dover to house his collection. The 14 galleries of the museum contain a collection which covers more than 200 years of American art and decorative art gems. That same year, Biggs established the Sewell C. Biggs Chair in American Art History at the University of Delaware. The architect of the Sewell C. Biggs House, Paul Rudolph, was an important influence on American Modernism in the mid-twentieth century. According to C. Ford Peatross, curator of Architecture, Design, and Engineering at the Library of Congress, "Paul Rudolph was a profound influence on the second half of the 20th century and a model of rare integrity who is being rediscovered by a new generation". Christopher Domin and Joseph King, authors of 'Paul Rudolph, The Florida Houses', state that "The Florida houses are an accessible entry into a formidable career. His work is a compelling example of regionally inspired modernism'. The design of the house portrays a significant example of the modernism which swept through the state in the years after World War II which embodies the characteristics of mid-century modernism, the innovative uses of new materials, and adaptation to suit the South Florida environment. 5 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 4, 2005 Paul Rudolph's design was constructed by the Sinks, father and son, who had a long record of building in Delray Beach. The elder Sinks built many of the structures on or near Atlantic Avenue such as the Masonic Building, the 1926 High School, the Wuepper Building, the Casa del Ray Hotel, and the Arcade Building. The Sewell C. Biggs House is associated with an original owner who was important in preserving, conserving, and promoting American fine and decorative arts. The style of the home is a design unique to Delray Beach and is the artistic work of an architect who was a leader in the 20th-century American design field. It is also the only Paul Rudolph designed building in Delray Beach (although Rudolph designed many Florida homes and buildings) and is representative of 20th-century regional modernism tailored for the Florida environment. Further, the house is an example of the skill of the Sinks construction firm which built some of the best surviving historic buildings in Delray Beach. Designating this site as historic will help preserve the character of the extant historic dwelling and will promote the preservation of other surrounding historic properties. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(C) (4), after formally reviewing the designation report, the Board shall set a public hearing date for the proposed designation. Mr. Jose Aguila, Architect with Currie, Sowards, Aguila Architects, representing the owner advised he was familiar with the property and would like to see it placed in the Local Register of Historic Places. Ms. Lake mentioned as this home is contemporary and does not fall on the preferred list. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing. It was moved by Mr. Miller, seconded by Ms. Dersh, and approved 7 to 0 to move to set a date for the required public hearing associated with the proposed historic designation of The Sewell C. Biggs House (212 Seabreeze Avenue) for the Historic Preservation Board meeting of May 18, 2005. B. The Plastridge House (19 NE 10th Street), Clemmer Mayhew, Agent Consideration of the designation of an individually listed property in the Local Register of Historic Places and set a date for the Public Hearing. The owner has proposed to designate the subject property to the Local Register of Historic Places and has employed the services of Clemmer Mayhew to undertake the research and prepare the designation report. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(1), to qualify as a historic site the property must fulfill one or more of the criteria set forth in LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(2) and/or (3). The designation report contains, at minimum, sufficient information to meet the criteria stated in LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(3). The criteria are as follows: 6 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 4, 2005 LDR Section 4.5.1(B) (2): (a) Is associated in a significant way with the life or activities of a major person important in city, state, or national history (for example, the homestead of a local founding family); (b) Is the site of a historic event with significant effect upon the city, state, or nation; (c) Is associated in a significant way with a major historic event, whether cultural, economic, social, military, or political; (d) Exemplifies the historical, political, cultural, economic, or social trends of the community in history; or (e) Is associated in a significant way with a past or continuing institution which has contributed substantially to the life of the city. LDR Section 4.5.1(B) (3): (a) Portrays the environment in an era of history characterized by one or more distinctive architectural styles; and, (b) Embodies those distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, period, or method of construction; (c) Is a historic or outstanding work of a prominent architect, designer, landscape architect, or builder; or (d) Contains elements of design, detail, material, or craftsmanship of outstanding quality or which represented, in its time, a significant innovation or adaptation to the South Florida environment. The designation report demonstrates that the subject property qualifies as a historic site as it: portrays the environment in an era of history characterized by one or more distinctive architectural styles [LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(3)(a)]; embodies those distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, period, or method of construction [LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(3)(b)]; and contains elements of design, detail, material, or craftsmanship of outstanding quality or which represented, in its time, a significant innovation or adaptation to the South Florida environment [LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(3)(d)]. • - The Plastridge House is a good example of a one-story Frame Vernacular House which was built during the pre-World War I era, c.1905-1915, which exemplifies a specific historical and cultural period that is rapidly vanishing from the South Florida landscape. Frame Vernacular buildings from this era define the character of the earliest settlers and serve as historical reminders of one of the century's significant periods of development. The box-like configuration is clad with weatherboard and topped with a pyramidal roof, the steep geometric lines of which resist hurricane winds and tropical heat. These plain, functional houses were often purchased from pattern books with simplistic design elements from this era. The house was manufactured and shipped in pieces to the owner who would employ local craftsmen to assemble the house and add distinctive details. 7 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 4, 2005 The property has been altered from its original one bedroom, one bathroom layout. In 1947, a bedroom and bathroom were added and the front corner porch has been enclosed. Although in need of repair, the structure has retained its integrity and charm and is one of only approximately ten pre-World War I structures with pyramidal roofs that remain in the area. Designating this site as historic will help preserve the character of the extant historic dwelling, will promote the preservation of other surrounding historic properties, and will help broaden the public's perception of historic preservation and educate them about a significant historical period of the City's development. The property consists of Lot 24 & Lot 25, Block 7, Dell Park Subdivision which are currently joined by a Unity of Title. If historic designation is approved, a waiver will be requested from the Historic Preservation Board to allow the construction of a single family home on Lot 24, pursuant to LDR Section4.1.4(C). Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(C) (4), after formally reviewing the designation report, the Board shall set a public hearing date for the proposed designation. Mr. Clemmer Mayhew, representing the owner of the property, advised as part of the designation report and as a condition of designation there be no impact and the Board finding special circumstances to assist because of the nature and character that Lot 24 would be designated a buildable lot of record. No historic house should be left behind. The owner wants to make it very clear that he needs to be able to sell the lot in order to restore the house. He will live in the cottage and restore it. Lot 24 was not part of this parcel, and tried to clarify the importance of no infill construction. Mr. Mayhew passed out color photographs. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Mr. Adams advised there was a problem in the historic area if two lots are under the same ownership, and one can be classed as not buildable. A waiver request has not been submitted. I do not think the Board can guarantee granting a waiver because it has become designated, and this issue cannot be discussed at this time. Terrill Barton, Assistant City Attorney, agreed that this issue should not be discussed. Ms. Schatz requested an explanation regarding the Unity of Title. Mr. Adams advised if it is not historic, the Board cannot consider the waiver. Ms. Barton advised we have to address each item individually, and a Unity of Title is filed by the County The Board does not have the power to do this. You must contact someone in the Public Records Office to find out the procedure. It is not addressed by the Board. Mr. Adams advised that in some cases you might have a lot that has the required frontage. In the historic district several of the lots may be nonconforming. Mr. Silberstein advised that if it is designated historic, the Board can review a waiver request. However, this house is not within the historic district. He inquired if the two lots were going to be separated. 8 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 4, 2005 Mr. Mayhew advised that paragraph C. of the designation procedures within the Designation Report states you may replace or compliment. The waiver is for properties that are not designated. Paragraph C.3.b states you can write in a designation report, etc. with regard to but not limited to. The waiver is something else entirely. There has been a history of the Historic Preservation Board granting these in the past. Ms. Schatz inquired if they wanted the historic designation on the entire parcel. Mr. Mayhew advised as part of the designation report, Lot 24 has a historical buildable lot. Ms. Schatz advised in order to sell the lot you have to terminate the Unity of Title. Mr. Mayhew advised they spoke to the tax office and if it was sold it would be given a new control number. Chairman Perez advised the only thing the Board could do was to designate the property historic. Ms. Barton inquired if he wanted the City to approve this with a condition. Mr. Silberstein advised he is prepared to approve the designation of the house as historic, however, we cannot approve the empty lot. Mr. Mayhew advised that the Board has granted a waiver in the past. Ms. Barton advised you cannot make any guarantees on the waiver until it is submitted, as the City's code has changed since 1989. This Board does not have the authority to approve a waiver. A Unity of Title would have to be approved by the Planning and Zoning Board, and at this point it is premature. Mr. Silberstein advised if you want to pursue this you would need to come in with a design proposal for the Board. Ms. Barton advised the applicant would have to go to the Planning and Zoning Board and after the house was designated historic it would have to come back to the Historic • Preservation Board. Chairman Perez advised Mr. Mayhew that Mr. Adams would speak to the Planning and Zoning Director regarding this issue. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing. It was moved by Mr. Silberstein, seconded by Ms. Schatz, and passed 7 to 0 to move to postpone and discuss with the Planning and Zoning Department the required public hearing associated with the proposed historic designation of The Plastridge House (19 NE 10 Street)for the Historic Preservation Board meeting of May 18, 2005. 9 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 4, 2005 C. La France Hotel (140 NW 4th Avenue), Delray Beach CRA, Owner Recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Board on an LDR amendment to allow Senior Housing as a Conditional Use, rezoning from R-1-A (Single Family Residential) to CF (Community Facilities), and associated Conditional Use Request to establish a Senior Housing Facility at the former La France Hotel (140 NW 4th Avenue). The item before the Board is that of making a recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Board on an LDR amendment to allow Senior Housing as a Conditional Use within the proposed CF (Community Facilities) zoning district, rezoning from R-1-A (Single Family Residential) to CF (Community Facilities), and associated Conditional Use Request to establish a Senior Housing Facility at the former La France Hotel (140 NW 4th Avenue), pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(D). Since the property is located in the West Settlers Historic District, the Historic Preservation Board is being asked at this time to make a recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Board. The proposed rezoning involves one property totaling 0.36 acres within the West Settlers Historic District. The property is located on the west side of NW 4th Avenue, approximately 100 feet south of Martin Luther King Jr. Drive (NW 2nd Street). The property consists of a Portion of Lot 8, and Lots 9 and 10, Block 27, Replat of a Portion of Lot 27, Town of Linton (Delray). The property contains the 4,028 square foot (16 rooms/units) former La France Hotel. The two-story structure was built in 1947 in the Masonry Vernacular style and is considered a contributing building within the West Settlers Historic District. The development proposal is to alter the extant historic building and construct an addition to provide a Senior Housing Facility which will offer affordable housing units for residents of 60 years and older. A rezoning from R-1-A (Single Family Residential) to CF (Community Facilities) is also requested. The applicant (CRA) has stated that the rezoning is required as there has been a change in circumstance which makes the current zoning inappropriate. There is a need for affordable housing for the senior residents of Delray Beach who cannot afford market rate housing at their current income level. Also, there has been a change of ownership of the property from a private individual to a government agency (CRA) which has made a commitment to the community to preserve the historic structure and adapt it for re-use as a Senior Housing Facility. The most appropriate use for a building is the use for which it was first built; however, this is not always an affordable or sustainable option. When a new use has to be found for a historic building, the new use should be both appropriate and sustainable. In this case, the building will continue to be used as an accommodation and only minor internal alterations of the extant historic building will be required. As there is a need for this form of housing and the proposal has the backing of a government agency, it is anticipated that the proposed use will be sustainable, ensuring the future protection and maintenance of the historic structure. The proposal, therefore, can be regarded as an appropriate and sustainable new use for the former La France Hotel. 10 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 4, 2005 Ms. Thuy Shutt, Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA), advised she would like the Board to make one consideration regarding the LDR. In attempting to preserve the stucco walls we have found out that some of the rooms on the first floor will not meet the recommended square footage. We would like a 35% reduction because this would change the integrity of the existing building. We do not want to take away the corridor. Chairman Perez inquired if they were individual rooms at this point. Ms. Shutt advised there are sixteen rooms without bathroom facilities and four units share a bathroom. We would like each room to have a private bathroom and kitchenette. We cannot move the walls in the building. We are also asking for the Planning and Zoning Board approval to change the minimum room size. The architect enlarged the room to 350 square feet, but it will cut into the hallway and we would have to move the structural walls. Ms. Shutt also advised they will have to apply for site plan approval, and then submit a waiver. Ms. Barton, Assistant City Attorney, advised that the density is consistent with the other facilities we have in the community. This is consistent with the Adult Congregate Living Facilities (ACLF) guidelines regarding density and room size. The Historic Preservation Board can only recommend a reduction in size, and then it has to go before the Planning and Zoning Board. It was moved by Mr. Silberstein, seconded by Ms. Dersh, and approved 7 to 0 to move a recommendation of approval to the Planning and Zoning Board for the LDR amendment to allow Senior Housing as a Conditional Use within the CF (Community Facilities) zoning district, rezoning from R-1-A (Single Family Residential) to CF (Community Facilities) to allow the Historic Preservation Board to recommend the change in the minimum size requirements of the rooms, and the associated Conditional Use Request to establish a Senior Housing Facility at the former La France Hotel (140 NW 4th Avenue). V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments: Mr:Andy Katz, 220 South Ocean Boulevard, thanked the members of the Board as well as staff for their hard work. Historic preservation adds to our quality of life. In the next few months you will be getting three different COA's for demolition. I would like to request that you keep the best interest of Delray Beach in mind and maintain the charm. B. Report from Historic District Representatives: None C. Board Members: Chairman Perez advised at a later date we can start looking at our design guidelines and what issues can be approved administratively. We should put this on the agenda some time in the future. Mr. Silberstein advised fence issues should be black and white (no grey area). 11 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 4, 2005 Chairman Perez advised we have to take into account where the house is located regarding fences, shutters, etc. D. Staff: Mr. Adams advised we are considering coming up with ways where demolition will not be as attractive as it has been in the past. Maybe we should allow them a coverage area of more than 40% and increase the cost of the application fee. If you have any ideas regarding this I would like to hear them. I am attending a seminar in Coral Gables and will be meeting with other Planners. VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Board made a motion to adjourn at 7:30 p.m. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for May 4, 2005 and was formally adopted and approved by the Board on . Denise A. Valek If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. 12 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA MEETING DATE: May 18, 2005 LOCATION: City Commission Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Francisco Perez-Azua, Maura Dersh, and Michelle Reich MEMBERS ABSENT: Jeffrey Silberstein, John Miller, Jr., and Linda Lake STAFF PRESENT: Warren Adams, Brian Shutt, and Denise Valek I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Perez at 6:00 p.m. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. No one from the Public addressed the Board on non-agenda items. Chairman Perez read a summary of the Quasi-Judicial Hearing procedures. The Notary swore in individuals for testimony. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Ms. Schatz, seconded by Ms. Dersh and passed 4 to 0 to approve the Minutes of April 20, 2005 as written. III. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS A. 1109 Seaspray Avenue (The Price House), Individually listed, John Papera Item Before the Board: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of aluminum framed impact resistant windows. (Quasi-Judicial Hearing). Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. The "Price House", named for its original owners, was originally located at 526 North Ocean Boulevard. In 1998, the property was purchased for the development of five multi-million dollar homes that forced either the relocation or demolition of the dwelling. Rather than demolish the home, the owners, Steven Hayes and Patricia Okenica, moved the house and the two-story garage to its present location at 1109 Seaspray Avenue. The house was constructed in 1935 in the Monterrey style and designed by Delray Beach's first "city architect" Samuel Ogren. The property consists of Lot 11, Seaspray Estates, Delray Beach and is situated on the north side of Seaspray Avenue approximately 300 feet west of Andrews Avenue. The main block of the wood-frame house is two story and sheathed in clapboard. The property is zoned R-1-AAA. Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 18, 2005 On March 3, 1998, the City Commission approved designating the property as an individually listed historic property due to its architectural significance. During its meeting on March 18, 1998, the HPB approved a COA for the rehabilitation of the property including site preparation, mechanical upgrades, and general repairs related to the relocation of the building. The City Commission later granted an ad valorem tax exemption for those improvements in February 2000. The tax exemption extends from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2009. On May 2, 2001, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed and approved improvements to the property for the Sickle family, who purchased the property the same year. The proposed alterations included a two-story addition, new roof, balcony extension, replacement of an existing window with a door, relocation of rear windows, landscape plan, and related interior improvements. The Board approved the requested improvements with several conditions including that the three, modern, single light windows on the first floor, south facade (facing Sea Spray Avenue) be replaced with those that are more suitable for the period of construction. Permits were issued and the work was completed; however, this condition of approval was not met. As the Certificate of Occupancy was left pending, an application was submitted to the HPB to request reconsideration of the condition of approval to replace the modern windows with more appropriate windows. The application was denied and the applicant was instructed to apply false muntins in a pattern deemed appropriate by the project architect and that the design was approved by staff. The current proposal is for the installation of aluminum single hung impact resistant windows. The most appropriate method of storm protection for this property would be to use the existing wooden shutters or, if the shutters would not provide the required protection, to install removable hurricane panels. The applicant; however, has stated that around 2/3 of the windows were replaced with aluminum windows prior to him purchasing the property. No application for the installation of the existing impact resistant windows can be found; however, elevations from a 2001 application to alter the dwelling depict some aluminum-frame windows. The photographs submitted by the applicant indicate that the existing aluminum frame windows are designed to look like they are single hung but are actually casement windows. The applicant wishes to replace the remaining historic wood frame windows with aluminum-frame, single hung impact windows to fully protect the dwelling from hurricanes and to give the dwelling a consistent appearance throughout. However, the applicant has not been clear as to where on the dwelling the windows he wishes to replace are situated. If he wishes to install aluminum windows to the side or rear of the dwelling, and some of the windows to these elevations are aluminum, this could be supported. If; however, the applicant wishes to remove wood frame windows which are visible from the public right-of-way or from a façade which contains all wood windows, this, as in similar applications, could not be supported. The three, modem, single light windows on the first floor of the south facade (facing Sea Spray Avenue) are still in existence and the applicant wishes to replace them with ' aluminum-frame, single hung windows. The removal of original materials from a historic building should be avoided unless the material has deteriorated beyond repair when it should be replaced with an identical material. In this case; however, 2/3 of the windows have already been replaced and the 3 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 18, 2005 applicant wishes to replace the remainder for increased protection and to give the historic dwelling a uniform appearance. As part of this proposal, the applicant will also be removing the three inappropriate modern windows which do not open from the south facade and replacing them with functioning windows of a more appropriate design. The installation of aluminum frame, single-hung windows with a similar muntin profile to the historic windows on a façade with existing aluminum frame windows can be supported if the windows are not visible from the public right-of-way. For windows visible from the public right-of-way, the frames should be manufactured from wood and be given a similar muntin profile to the original windows. It is also recommended that the applicant replace any aluminum frame or casement windows which are visible from the public right-of-way with wood frame single hung windows. A further condition of approval is that clear glass is used in the windows. It is noted that the building retains many of its original wooden shutters and shutter dogs. Although the installation of impact resistant glass means they will not be required for storm protection, it is a condition of approval that they are retained and repaired or replaced as necessary as they contribute to the building's character. Where the original shutters and dogs are beyond repair or are missing, they should be replaced with shutters and dogs of an identical design and material. Based on the analysis above, positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8)(c) and (g), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation can be made. Mr. John Papera, Jr., 1109 Seaspray Avenue, Delray Beach, advised he purchased the home in the middle of hurricane season, and this season will be the same. We had a problem getting insurance to cover wind damage. We are looking to replace the windows and keeping the exact look and feel of what we have now. They are all single hung sash type. The windows in the front do not open, and the side windows have vinyl replacement windows that were installed prior to the house being moved. Our intent is to replace all the windows. Chairman Perez advised that under condition no. 1) you are required to have wood frame windows. Mr. Adams advised that based upon decisions made in the past it is recommended that wood windows are installed, and in some cases we have insisted all the windows are wood frame. However, on some houses there is a mixture of windows. The applicant is willing to replace all the windows. It is acceptable to have aluminum frame not visible and wood on the visible right-of-way. We are looking at the best solution. Ms. Reich inquired if there was a difference in the cost between the aluminum and wood. Mr. Papera advised he did not get quotes on the wood frame windows. I would request that the Board consider allowing the aluminum windows. Chairman Perez advised the aluminum windows will take away from the home's integrity, and this house deserves to have wood clad windows. Chairman Perez advised Mr. Papera to get some estimates. 4 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 18, 2005 Mr. Adams advised because there is such a mix of windows on the house, aluminum windows could be put on the side and rear but aluminum clad with wood frames should be on the front of the house. It was the Board's consensus to use the wood clad windows in the front and aluminum on the rear and side. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing. It was moved by Ms. Schatz, seconded by Ms. Dersh, and passed 4 to 0 to move approval of the COA for 1109 Seaspray Avenue by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and (c) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: 1) That any impact windows installed within view from the public right-of-way have wood frames and muntin profiles to match the historic windows; and 2) That clear glass is used in the windows; and 3) That the wooden shutters and shutter dogs are retained and repaired where necessary; and, 4) That where the original shutters are beyond repair or are missing, they are replaced with shutters and shutter dogs of an identical design and material. B. 302 NE 7th Avenue (Hartman Townhomes), Individually listed, George Brewer, Agent Item Before the Board: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated demolition request, Class V site plan, landscape plan and design elements for the construction of a townhouse development. Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. Ms. Dersh drove past the property, and Chairman Perez spoke to Michael Weiner, Esquire regarding the project. The subject property consists of Lots 13 & 14, Block 113, Highland Park Subdivision and is located on a .33 acre site at the northwest corner of NE 7th Avenue and NE 3rd Street. The property contains a 2,752 square foot, two-story Frame Vernacular style dwelling which is known as the Hartman House, a 324 square foot concrete garage, and a swimming pool. The 1923 dwelling is listed in the Local Register of Historic Places and is zoned Medium Density Residential (RM). The dwelling is currently vacant. An application for Class V Site Plan approval for this development was submitted in November, 2004. However, as the two-story structure is non-conforming with respect to setbacks, the repair work that could be undertaken to it could not exceed 10% of the 5 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 18, 2005 current replacement cost in any 12 month period and the cost of exterior modifications could not exceed 15% [LDR Section 1.3.6]. In the case of individually listed historic structures; however, the cost of improvements can exceed the 10% interior and 15% exterior maximum thresholds. In March, 2005, an application for historic designation for the Hartman House was submitted. The designation report stated the house was eligible for listing on the Local Register as it is associated in a significant way with the life or activities of a major person important in city, state, or national history, exemplifies the historical, political, cultural, economic, or social trends of the community in history, and portrays the environment in an era of history characterized by one or more distinctive architectural styles. The designation was approved by the City Commission at the second hearing on May 3, 2005. The applicant has submitted a Class V Site Plan Application for the repair of the extant historic dwelling, the demolition of the garage and swimming pool, and the construction of two new dwellings. The townhouse development proposal includes the following: • Demolition of the garage and removal of the swimming pool. • Repair and alteration of the extant historic building which involves the construction of a 958 square foot addition consisting of a two car garage with a bedroom on the second floor. The interior alterations and addition will result in a four-bedroom unit totaling 3,247square feet under a/c. • Construction of two new dwellings, one of which will be a detached three story structure to the west of the historic dwelling, and the other will be a two-story structure attached to the north façade of the historic dwelling. The three-story building (Unit A) will contain 2,654 square feet under a/c with three bedrooms and a two car garage. The two-story unit will contain 2,400 square feet under a/c with a one-car garage and three bedrooms. • Associated landscaping and construction of paver block parking with a driveway from the alley which accesses the garages of Units A and C. The proposal is for the construction of a townhouse development which includes the restoration of the Hartman House (Unit B), which is listed on the Local Register of Historic Places, and the construction of two new dwelling units. Unit A is essentially a detached dwelling three-story dwelling (attached to the Hartman Houses by only a covered trellis) and Unit C is a two-story dwelling attached to the Hartman House by means of a double garage on the first story and a bedroom on the second story. The Hartman House (Unit B) is a two-story structure which was built in 1923. The dwelling consists of stucco over wood framed walls with a pavilion-style roof over the main body of the house and a hipped roof section over the projecting section to the front (east) façade. The proposed landscaping comprises of a mixture of existing and new plants. To accommodate the development proposal, a number of trees must be removed from the site. These include two Schieffiera Trees, a Carambola Tree, an Areca Palm, a tropical Almond Tree, and three Mango Trees from the NW corner of the site, a Norfolk Island Pine from the south property line, and, two Black Olive Trees and a Schieffiera Tree from the east property line. A number of existing trees will also be relocated. These 6 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 18, 2005 include a Rose Apple Tree and a number of Sabal Palms. Existing trees which will be incorporated into the landscape proposal include a Ficus Tree at the southwest corner of the property, and a Spanish Lime Tree, Oak Trees, and Mango Trees at the north property line. New trees proposed for the site include six Gumbo Limbo Trees, a Carpenters Palm, two Fishtail Palms, seven Coconut Palms, eight Travellers Palms, and two Cat Palms. The proposed underplanting includes Simpson Stoppers, Bush Allamanda, Cocoplum, Bougainvillea, and Jasmine Vine. The City Horticulturist has reviewed the proposal and determined the proposal complies with LDR Section 4.6.16. The Hartman House (Unit B) is a two-story structure which was built in 1923. The dwelling consists of stucco over wood framed walls with an asphalt shingled, pavilion- style roof over the main body of the house and a hipped roof section over the projecting section of the front (east) façade. There is also a single-story projecting central section to the east façade. The front (east) facade of the dwelling has a classical appearance as it is perfectly symmetrical and balanced. The central section of the structure projects 8' from the main body of the dwelling and contains the centrally-located main entrance door. The dwelling contains the original wood frame windows to the front façade which are of a traditional four over one design. The historic structure has almost no ornamentation apart from a wheel window to the south façade; however, this may have been added at a later date along with the corresponding out of proportion window on the second floor as they are off-center and inconsistent with the symmetrical design of the building. It has been recommended that the both these windows are retained; however, as they are part of the development history of the building. The lack of ornamentation on the Hartman House contributes to its classical appearance and, as such, it has been recommended that no ornamentation is added during its restoration. Proposed appropriate works to the exterior of the structure will consist of replacing the shingles, the insertion of a more appropriately designed window to the middle of the second floor on the south façade, window repairs, the addition of a canopy over the front door, repainting, and the demolition of the existing garage and swimming pool. The stucco walls will be painted light 'Sea Froth in color, the window surrounds will be `Distant Gray', and the doors will be `Shadow Gray'. The proposal includes a two-story, pitched roof extension to the north façade which will attach the Hartman House to Unit C. The east elevation of this section will contain two arched garage doors. The walls will be of cmu with stucco to match the Hartman House, although the first floor will have a Cyprus lattice pattern insert. The windows on the second story of the proposed addition will be of a one over one design. Internally, the ground floor of the Hartman Houses contains a living room, dining room, Florida room, library, kitchen, laundry, a bedroom, and a two-car garage in the proposed addition. The second story contains three bedrooms, a den, and a further bedroom in the proposed addition. Unit A (west side of the property) will be a new three-story dwelling with a pitched, asphalt shingle roof. The projecting section of the front (south) façade will be faced with hardi-board lapped siding while the west façade will be faced with stucco to match the Hartman House. The windows will be of four over one and three over one design. Unit C has many decorative features which distinguish it from the historic building including aluminum shutters and decorative window sills, balconies with decorative brackets, decorative wood accent trusses, and exposed rafter tails. The hardi-plank walls will be painted Gaucho Brown, the stucco walls will be Greenbrier Beige, the shutters will be Shadow Gray and the doors and windows will be Mahogany stain. Internally, the first 7 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 18, 2005 floor of Unit A comprises a bedroom, laundry and a two-car garage. The second story contains a living room, dining room, kitchen, pantry, and powder room. The third floor contains two bedrooms. Unit C (north side of property) will be a new two-story of similar construction to the new three-story dwelling. The first floor will contain two bedrooms with en-suite facilities, a game room, and a single-car garage. The second story will contain a living/dining room, a kitchen, and a bedroom with en-suite facilities. There will be a central courtyard to the three units which will contain a swimming pool and spa. On the exterior of the rear garage wall joining Units B and C will be a decorative cascade fountain. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation states that: New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. Design Guidelines Locate an addition as inconspicuously as possible, usually to the rear or least public side of a building. In a historic district, consider the surrounding buildings and the compatibility of the addition in terms of size, scale, materials, mass and roof form. Do not introduce a new architectural style, or too closely mimic the style of the existing building. Additions should be simply and cleanly designed and NOT attempt to replicate the original design. Insure that the addition is secondary and subordinate to the main mass of the historic building. Additions that overwhelm the original building are not an acceptable solution. Analysis: The development proposal involves the restoration of the historic Hartman House and the construction of two new dwellings to form a townhouse development. The restoration of the Hartman House will consist of mainly appropriate repairs which should be encouraged as the building will be put to an appropriate and sustainable use which will ensure its ongoing maintenance and repair. It is also accepted, that to make a development proposal viable, it may be necessary to extend a historic structure. In this case, the historic structure will be extended to the north by a two-story addition including a two-car garage on the first story and a bedroom on the second story. The addition and the attached new two-story structure conform to the LDRs in terms of height, proportion of openings, relationship of materials, texture and color, and scale; however, as the extension is to the side of the historic structure, it is visible from the public right-of-way (NE 7th Avenue). A distinction between the historic structure and the new construction has been made by the use of differing materials and the addition of architectural ornamentation. However, this distinction could be made even clearer if the bedroom over 8 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 18, 2005 the double garage was removed and the roof height lowered so the profile of the Hartman House roof was not interrupted. If removal of the bedroom affects the viability of the proposal, an attempt should be made to reduce the height of the roof. Consideration should also be given to increasing the front setback of the new two-story dwelling to further set it apart from the historic structure. Except for the changes recommended above, new two and three-story dwellings are also appropriate with regard to the LDRs, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and • the Design Guidelines. The two new dwellings are of a traditional design yet complement the historic dwelling through the use of similar detailing such as window design. The use of different materials and a move away from the symmetrical appearance of the Hartman house; however, allow them to be differentiated from the historic dwelling. Neither new dwelling dominates the historic structure and, as can be seen from the color rendering, the Hartman House stands out because of its simplicity in color and lack of ornamentation, and its symmetrical design. With regard to the new three-story building, although it projects above the roofline of the Hartman House, it does not dominate the historic structure. The proposal includes the demolition of the swimming pool which was built in 1962, and the garage, neither of which appear to have any historic significance. The development proposal involves the restoration of the historic Hartman House and the construction of two new dwellings to form a residential townhouse development. The restoration of the Hartman House will ensure the historic structure is put to an appropriate and viable use which will ensure its ongoing repair and maintenance. The proposal, once the attached conditions have been addressed, will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will meet the criteria set forth in Sections 3.1 and 2.4.5(F)(5) of the LDRs, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and the Design Guidelines. Mr. George Brewer, Architect, advised he faced many challenges regarding plans for this house. He wanted to be respectful of the historic house without competing with it. A rendering was submitted to Mr. Adams a few weeks ago. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing. Board discussion ensued regarding the following items: Site Plan Item No. 5. regarding a physical connection with a common fire-rated wall between Unit A and Unit B. Design Elements Item No. 2. regarding setback of the extension and Unit C increased. 9 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 18, 2005 Item No. 3. regarding the doorway from the first floor bedroom to the laundry is blocked up and the entrance to the laundry is gained via the Florida Room. Mr. Adams advised he was not concerned about the fire wall. Michael Weiner, Esquire, representing Mr. Brewer advised that the definition of a building is to protect or shelter for any occupancy. We have provided space which gives protection or shelter. Therefore, this is two stories and one building under the code. Mr. Shutt advised if they are asking for a variance we would have to notify the public and you would have to come back to the Board. Mr. Adams advised he is happy with the design as long as we can tie it into the LDR's. Board discussion ensued regarding improving the alley. Mr. Brewer advised they are improving the alleys, however, he would like the barriers removed. Chairman Perez agreed that the barriers should be removed as it will benefit the project. Site Plan It was moved by Ms. Dersh, seconded by Ms. Schatz. and passed 4 to 0 to move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan and design elements for 302 NE 7th Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: 1) That revised plans be submitted addressing the technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report. 2) That a five foot (5') right-of-way dedication is made for NE 7th Avenue prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) That a two foot (2') right-of-way dedication is made for both alleys prior to issuance of a building permit. 4) That a plat for the development proposal is submitted and the type of ownership is indicated. 5) That two (2) off-street parking spaces on NE 3rd Street are added. Design Elements It was moved by Ms. Dersh, seconded by Ms. Schatz, and passed 4 to 0 to move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness and the associated design elements for 302 NE 7th Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report 10 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 18, 2005 and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, and the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, subject to the following conditions: 1) That the roof height of the extension to the north façade of the Hartman house is modified by lowering the fascia, and adding a dormer. This will be approved administratively. 2) That the doorway from the first floor bedroom to the laundry in the Hartman House is blocked up and entrance to the laundry is gained via the Florida room. 3) The following colors submitted on the rendering submitted at the Board Meeting will be used: Benjamin Moore gaucho brown (2096-40), shadow gray (2125-40), greenbrier beige (HC-79), sea froth (2107-60), and distant gray (2124-70). IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments: B. Report from Historic District Representatives: None C. Board Members: Ms. Dersh inquired if we are allowed to discuss the fact that an applicant a few weeks ago wanted a house designated historic, so that they could come back and get variances from the Historic Preservation Board instead of the Board of Adjustment. Mr. Shutt advised if it meets the criteria and the Board approves it and the designation is supported then someone can do that. It is difficult to get a variance from the Board of Adjustment. Ms. Schatz advised when we were talking about modifying the boundaries for historic preservation and people were complaining there were too many issues involved. If somebody is designating their property and just because they come to us for a variance doesn't mean we have to give it to them. Chairman Perez advised they could tear a house down and build something from scratch that matches other houses. The applicant decided not to do that and now we have something interesting looking. Ms. Reich inquired if a building is restored, then how do they build an addition that does not have historic qualities. Chairman Perez advised when you replace elements on a historic house they have to be replaced in kind. Mr. Adams advised if you buy a non-conforming building you can spend 10% on internal repairs and 15% on external repairs. There is a limit on spending to repair the home. If it is historic more money can go into the historic building. You can make the building historic because you can obtain certain waivers. Once it is historic it has to come to the Board for approvals. 11 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 18, 2005 D. Staff: Mr. Adams advised that a first application to install Armor Screen on a house will come before the Board at the next meeting. This screen can be rolled up for storage. The advantage of this screen is that is easier to store, lighter in weight, the panels are removable, and the tracks on the building are a lot less noticeable. These individuals will be required to bring in samples for the Board to see. Shutters can be approved administratively. VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Board made a motion to adjourn at 7:30 p.m. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for May 18, 2005 and was formally adopted and approved by the Board on Denise A. Valek If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. 12 DECBAIBCACH DCCItAYBCACH bitid 1110! HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD i' MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT ( IP, 1903 1903 2001 2001 Agent: Dennis Thompson, City of Delray Beach Project Name: Payne Residence Project Location: 125 NW 3`d Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness an elevation change at 125 NW 3rd Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H). BACKGROUND/PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject property consists of the south 2/3 of Lot 4 and the east 60 feet of the north 41.5 feet of Lot 5, Block 43, Town of Delray, and is located on the east side of NW 3rd Avenue, approximately 300 feet south of NW 2nd Street. The property contains a 1,325 square foot, one-story Frame Vernacular dwelling which was constructed in 1917, and a carport which was added in 1963. The dwelling is a contributing building within the West Settlers Historic District and is zoned R-1-A (Single Family Residential). Security bars have been added to the front façade. There have been no recent Board or administrative actions pertaining to this property. Project Description The proposed project consists of the relocation of the existing front entrance from the southwest corner to the northwest corner of the front (west) façade, and the replacement of an existing window on the south facade with a smaller window. Associated works include the removal of the existing front steps and the construction of new brick steps at the relocated entrance, the removal of the security bars, and repairs to any damage caused by the removal of the security bars. ANALYSIS Development Standards LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(a, b, g, h) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The applicable standards are as follows: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, Meeting Date:June 1,2005 Agenda Item: III.A. 125 NW 3`d Avenue—Relocation of front door and replacement window Page 2 demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(8) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: (b) front facade proportion, (c) proportion of openings, (d) rhythm of solids to voids, (f) rhythm of entrance and/or porch projections, and (q) consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color, with the predominant designs and materials used being visually compatible with the surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district. The Delray Beach Design Guidelines state the following with respect to wood siding and windows: Wood Siding Repairs may include limited replacement with compatible materials for those extensively deteriorated or missing parts or features. Windows Recommended: Repair frames and sash by patching, splicing, consolidating or otherwise reinforcing and replacing in kind. Damaged parts may sometimes be replaced from other salvaged historic windows. Replacing viable windows rather than maintaining the original should be avoided. Not recommended: Cutting new openings, altering existing openings, blocking windows, and installing a replacement sash that does not fit the window The SecretaPy of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation suggest the following: The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. 125 NW 3rd Avenue—Relocation of front door and replacement window Page 3 Analysis The removal of historic features should be avoided where possible; however, in this case, the exterior alterations are necessary because of proposed changes to the interior layout of the structure. The new layout will relocate the bathroom to the southwest corner of the dwelling, therefore, the front entrance must be relocated and a smaller window must be installed for privacy. The internal alterations to the layout of the dwelling is being undertaken to meet the owners requirements without the need for an addition to the structure. The new front entrance will involve minimal removal of historic siding from the structure as it will be inserted into an existing window opening. If possible, the existing front door will be reused in the new entrance; however, if a new door is to be installed, it will be visually compatible as it will be of similar appearance and dimensions to the existing door. The existing door opening will be closed up with siding compatible with the existing. A new single hung window with a one over one light configuration will replace the existing awning window on the south facade to provide light and ventilation to the new bathroom. The installation of a single hung window can be supported as this type of window is consistent with buildings of this style and age, the change in design shows an alteration has taken place, and it will only be visible to people traveling north along NW 3rd Avenue. The locations and dimensions of the historic front entrance and side window recesses will be shown by the retention of the original door and window framing. In conjunction with the above alterations, the security bars, which adversely affect the appearance of the dwelling, will be removed from the windows. This change will open up the elevations of the dwelling and reinstate its historic appearance. Any damage caused by the removal of the bars will be appropriately repaired. The proposed alterations can be supported as they will allow the interior of the dwelling to be altered to meet the owner's requirements without the need of an extension, all new features will be compatible with the historic dwelling, the exterior alterations will be clearly visible, and the historic appearance of the dwelling will be reinstated. Therefore positive findings can be made with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(b, c, d, f, g), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the COA for 125 NW 3rd Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(H), 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8) (b), (c), (d), (f), and (g) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. 125 NW 3`d Avenue—Relocation of front door and replacement window Page 4 C. Move denial of the COA for 125 NW 3rd Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(H), 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8) (b), (c), (d), (f), and (g) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. RECOMMENDATION Move approval of the COA for 125 NW 3rd Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(H), 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8) (b), (c), (d), (f), and (g) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Attachments: Location Map, Photograph, Existing and Proposed Elevations Report Prepared by:Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner . - MARTIN _ _ _ LJTHERKINGJR DRIVE 00► Lii 91f Ztf BOfiir ►tZ VACANT 1.> : NC NC NC NC 1 2+ Q 11948�,- NC > Q" .. Q :NC 1 4 ��NC a r194r1i_0 rrr ti ` NC _ U J ��r1l J 1947 - NC NC SPADYJ-o u NC I � �rJ�� NC n n ......i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i - NC N `" 194 •ST. PAC, NC 2 _ n • r •CH NC VACANT ,,, �Ly ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦a: "� �?? 5tJ F`7I� ,.♦♦♦♦♦�• (V ST.PARKING ,m♦:*.♦♦O•♦.♦.♦. -1920rVI NC VACAN T 111 ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ � LOT ♦♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i ♦♦i♦i♦i♦i♦�♦i♦i♦ NC ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ' ' NC ll ♦i♦♦♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i 1902 VACANT NC� �,. VACANT ±::::`♦:*: C �� o 19'{ NC NC `O Q o NC �, 9rr�o '" NC �t� � IE d �� rr Z CO �'�r��rl�o_ NC I 1905 192b- VACANT c�. NC • �'"~ NC 40t Si� r315 r E N.W. 1ST ST. I NC a ♦♦♦♦ 4 . MASONIC i►♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦i♦♦♦♦♦♦ VACANT I LODGE i ti:44:•:•:4:4:•:•••• II• . N C m `►ic♦7,♦7 ♦:4•♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦I VACAN T • :44:4MT_ OLIVE CHURCH♦�♦� VACANT I attj♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ rj 1 , §§• VACANT Z fry0 ACANT z .v♦:4.04♦^♦♦1;0:416 ' • 3 6 z _. PARKING Ili VACANT , i LOT 2 8 VACANT I �� M7. OLIVE VACANT , 4 PARKING LOT VACANT I I NC FIRE I VACANT , VACANT VACART VACANT TENNIS STATION f II NO.-- 1 STADIUM A T L A N T I C A V E N U E - W Ui Q Q1 Q POLICE SOUTH Q _ I _ COMPLEX COUNTY n . "' co . COURT - HOUSE ui uT v' ,1 III N WEST-SETTLERS HISTORIC DISTRICT LEGEND: �...♦:p.: f REVISED: JUNE 2001 3 U 1♦♦��*:::►♦:♦:♦: PLANNING DEPARTMENT ❖S:. CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL BLOCK NUMBER HISTORIC SITE CONTRIBUTING HISTORIC BOUNDARY (NON-CONTRIBUTING) -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYS/LA/ -- MAP REF. LMA16 • • 9 e"� Is zet,1a1$� _ /�� S_ �t�{'�. i f� �r {mom ^ -�' �a �'5,4 s - tffi - r P , = .,p ip k'1,1 ,•--ra 'fifrrir'''A 4,r9.--4---Lii--.4$ - z2,&-a-,;', 1.,---I-:- -,:.•-mix&44-,--.----7T-:`4-4.1-,-v41,--...,-*:-,...1.,--.,,i.:...,. .-.-.,,,--,,-- A ,-,.'...;:-,-.:,.„-..„.,-'..„,i;--,.•7.,1`4,._..,1...7-..:;:'...,:...:_-...::-....---.._--- _.,:;_._.,:„:,;:: ..,.i",_ -.,. --—..',i'i-::„ i_r ',..',.--,t- .,;iaf'_-i:....::::2i.:-.1....!;—:.-:--• 1 1 �_€ ",, f i r i1 7iF - "s'�c- ;!Ct d,='-f- 4� k s '^ - _ R @'. t M� s'_ ; "' k ,(e s ''';tea,', } i "�- _ Kam. -7 . 'J -' �•Ry, - - sue,--_.q..?lek. .,.„ 'F; 6-'`3 j _ _ ." - _ W � - pf �mod" >'' ;. - a t +.0. .4 t „"'x. c` "mot ti '.:. a _ EXT'G now, I25' ELEV.(4 8'•0' J C. o c — EXISTING = �+ OARPORT r _! 1 - : : - FINISH FLOOR i ELEV.O0'0' . . EXISTING FRONT ELEVATION (WEST) SGALE I/4".I'-O" '1 { 1 . , c • i i .-__ _ eMb MARINO 4 125 may.61 0'•O' _ ...... ...��, — - `— II — ~ REMOVe EX13TIN6 SEWRIIY EARS c : ‘ , _ - exr6 ^- e%T'6 -- Nem ---' R20CATe a%ISTIN6 FRONT ENTRY _ DOOR TO NORTH VIM. E%15TING C' Q = — - FRANe CL05eD!ASTIR&OPENING CARPORT - q = — -_- = _ TO W i REGES3 OF OLD DOOR - r3 c. 7 _ : I -I- _..-. PIN15N FLOOR • eLOV,(.)0'•0' . \ RELOOATe e%15TIN6 ENTRY 5TEP3 TO NORTH 51De PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION (WEST) SCALE f/4"4PCO" • • • I . •. IN'iM2 EXT60EARQ7G ' 8 A IF 48 A t,, _°. l.a a i 7G ■ii Gi➢ii■iI 1 FINISH rtOOR lira! EXT`& SIDE ELEVATION SCALE 1/4"=1'—O" r in 'rig: r fry ■rr��ull int i�f�ll I� ;I� i 11.i1 IN ■ 111 ENT&BEARING a rr�r r� 10 r.�r., > insir m• -• REMOVE EXISINGBECIJR3re BARS — II 1 Imo �= mi _ REPLACE EXISTWG 1YSEOY1 wn1 -_ A SMALLERRAe 7CL SEED GLASS11TS W CICTA OPENING FRAME CLOSE EJ457MG CP@afNG MEI MIMMENIMOM — TO SNO1 RECESS OF ORIGINAL moon SIZE FINISH ELO _ ELEV.(.)CY-O' • RELOCAIE EXISIIN6 ENTRYEPS TO IZRTM sI1 S PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATION SCALE I/4"=1'-O" a" UCIRAI'6EACH - pit.A1 O[ACH as•a��cnr aHa1,��acirr HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD e� III- MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT I I 1'')93 - 1993 2001 - 2001 Agent: Rozzo Roofing, Inc. Project Name: Cote Residence Project Location: 321 North Swinton Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for a roof material change at 321 North Swinton Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H). BACKGROUND/PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject property consists of Lots 6 and 7, Block 65, Town of Delray, and is located on the east side of North Swinton Avenue, approximately 250 feet north of NE 3rd Street. The property contains a 2,648 square foot two-story Mediterranean Revival style building which was constructed in 1928. The dwelling is a contributing building within the Old School Square Historic District and is zoned Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD). There have been no recent Board or administrative actions pertaining to this property. Project Description The proposed project consists of the replacement of the existing flat cement roof tiles with concrete "S" tiles. The existing tiles are gray in color while the proposed replacements are 'Burnt Mission' (terracotta) in color. ANALYSIS Development Standards LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(a, b, g, h) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The applicable standards are as follows: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, Meeting Date:June 1,2005 Agenda Item: III.B. A • 321 North Swinton Avenue-Change of roof covering from flat to roll tiles Page 2 demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(8) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: (a) height, (b) front façade proportion, (q) consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color, and (h) roof shapes with the predominant designs and materials used being visually compatible with the surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district. The Delray Beach Design Guidelines state the following with respect to roofs: Recommended: Preserve the roof's shapes, decorative features, and materials, as well as its patterning, color, and size. Stripping the roof of its historic material, i.e. slate, clay tile, wood, or architectural metal is inappropriate. Not recommended: When the scope of the work involves a repair, avoid removing more of the roof than is necessary and reroofing with a new material to achieve an "improved"appearance. Stripping the roof of its historic material (i.e. slate, clay tile, wood or architectural metal). The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation suggest the following: The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Analysis The existing cement tiles on the roof have failed and the roof is leaking therefore repairs are required. The Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interiors Standards state that the removal of historic materials is inappropriate and that deteriorated historic features should be repaired where necessary rather than be replaced. Further, the a change of color and shape of the roofing material can have an adverse effect on the appearance of the building. In this case; however, it appears as if the existing flat cement tiles may not be the original roof covering as most Mediterranean Revival structures built at this time had a roof covering of terracotta colored barrel tiles. There is no evidence to support this theory; however, the existing roof covering does not look original to the dwelling and the roofing contractor also believes that the dwelling has been re-roofed in the past. The proposal can therefore be supported as there is doubt 321 North Swinton Avenue-Change of roof covering from flat to roll tiles Page 3 over whether the flat cement tiles are original, the proposed tiles are appropriate for the style and age of the dwelling, and the roof requires repairs. While the proposal can be supported, there is some concern regarding the strength of the existing roof structure. It would be prudent for the owner to obtain an engineer's report verifying that the existing roof structure will support the weight of the proposed new tiles. It is also suggested that consideration is given to repainting the building as the paint has been washed-out and is chipped. Based on the above, therefore, positive findings can be made with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(a, b, g, h), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the COA for 321 North Swinton Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(J), 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8) (a), (b), (g) and (h) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. C. Move denial of the COA for 321 North Swinton Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(J), 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8) (a), (b), (g) and (h) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. RECOMMENDATION Move approval of the COA for 321 North Swinton Avenue, by adopting the findings of - fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(J), 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8) (a), (b), (g) and (h) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Report Prepared by:Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner Attachments:Location Map, Photograph ... ) . • LAKE IDA ROAD . : • . -• N.E. 4 j I I i i i GREENS TH ST •• *T14 sl r'.....'''.."......... POST _ . CASON OFFICE - I g Ap -• _ _, • METHODIST - z >: _ _ CHURCH 3 I:: x - ___ _ ir-mg-Es-MN - - _,_ _ L__ _ -4 .'--- I < W .. 4:) < .( IF . ,..., . i ! ' - .., I • _ i I ir mil I . . • , ..____ N.W. 3RD ---ST. N.E. 3RD S. N.E. 3RD II I I .• ::---- ---- .I LLI— - .a > - , I ; . —i' _ . • I-- _ to CITY ,_ ?AIM I ATTORNEY • En CV mil - . - • • 0 ' BUILDING ; i s-. Lo • - — . ,-, -' •. _ . .1 N.W. 2ND ST. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. I DRIVE N.E. 2ND ST. - • o El 5-.'- z 14.1 _ . Ti I III .11 . D Mil 8 > o z z I 3 . W z --HUII/ CO 1 Lcii re ;.-- z CI TY > D I ,..1 HALL -< i all Et.- vi ,.. _ . I N.W. 1ST ST. N E. 1ST N.W. 1ST ST. 1.1 1 ST. ..- jil , :---: 0 I Z COMMUNITY t ilk o FIRE )- 1 = STATION • _ TENNIS OLD II vi STADIUM :-- ! I i . . i SS C01-11 j AREOO L in ' I NO. 1 ATLANTIC I AVENUE • • - ! . 11 ! .11;r• POLICE SOUTH . . - . . III I ! ' II ;! ' z - - ! ; ! I ; COMPLEX COUNTY • ,-- COURT 0 ..- HOUSE .1. . w 3 Z . _- > > < • -t It ., < . . . . . • 6 > a S.W. 1ST ST. S.W. 1ST ST. S.E. 1ST ST. . . ...- 6 > a o rr n - r:, ' z 6 - 6 . — 1 - . ' I to 1_,JBLIE'S 3 mi-me 1 SW. 2ND ST. SE. 2ND ST. IEJTI 111F-71 F7117-71 fi n F-7-1 T— I Fr[T17 / . 1----- 1-71T1 ' N . • --vdmr-- OLD SCHOOL SQUARE HISTORIC ARTS DISTRICT CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL -OSSHAD- PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- DRAWN BY: NPT • 3 •rr p•,. . -a'1 1 •N ' .,:ilfrcv,,-, . -N., •:„,,, .ii,v•:!..;,,':::::;.:,:: ,:•:,,,04,-,:,,,:•,, ,,,.3, ..;.,,f,,,,,s.,•„,..,.., • .4,1,....tii. ,.. -..... . . ,. ..... -..r.,_,,,,.-,:..,,,.J,-,,,,...;:,;:,-,4--,,.;,Ei-::,:,-,...:-.1,.,:.:::...,,,..„ ,,:;:y,../,,,•,,,,,,,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,i,,,,.., ....•,n., ,„... -1 ,,,, r4F,,k,.,,Ale:, .--, ,.,1,- ---7,---•x---------",,,,,,,-.Nr,,p,,,,in r... !„1,,,' .z.4'''„1,a:4:,4,....0.,..:44,::i!,'",',. 4'..,:;,',.,..4','''','''.",., •••?;;;y,.,,,,,,L,,.. •'.. . ---..--ji--.7-57.7-,.:77--' -`"-"7.04..... ",. 7 ' *..t.7.,/,t'.' ,,:',,,,,',..'ii.",404...,,,4411,#,-,t',"19i4P.'i "'1"•,'''',',4',"'•''.'' '''::'""''''•J'.,V "I'4';''!''''*t.44'"';,., ••,;,,,,t.'4,' ...d.','„,. s'ss,„ t'41"'ir •,, ...J.,',1,•'','''';.•''''' ---±•7—....._,...4„--•-'' 7"--- --,..,,,,..,,-77-':',, "„„*.iii5K,'":7,f',.•;..',:i:'•?';.',',"'PiAr,C,,•,,,N',',;,f,,••••,?",4•,",,,•:,"",.:4*;,;;",';',''."'','•'"i'• 4:'"ii,,,,,,,t,',,,,,'„Ail4•',,,,'",„'",5,,,""'',''"•,;;iti:44'4,7"4"4"''' • m•••••....:,,,, .,....;,10 .., ',.,,,,„ . • _.,-.__--_,-------,,„,,,„,,,,,,sawfaiv,r,x,,k,,r,,,J.. -,.,„,,,,,,,,L.,,,,,,,,..i;1,0i.,1,,..,,• ,- • • ••,,,,,.., ,..z,.:, ov,e,,4:24;,,,,,,,o,,,',,,,7.,..;; ,0,,,,—•;t-1--,r,'--,.. - , ';;...-,1„.,,,,.,,. . ..'. ...N,,-••••.''t .i.' „,,, ,,..1“i;#;;;,"''',_,°'''''',',7„.77.7,..,„„tt 4,,,,t1;f1;aV;',40''''.*\r,-.77,F;)",',•/, .;•''.,.''''":•••.;,''1.':1:::;,,,::.4,,...,.;''''5'htl.9k1,7,;':1;,1,,..;..:i.".4:441 11','?. '''' 1 4;4'.,','",l'P',;:1 :..,:''','' '.6 i:e:14.0011RP4.0;*4.75.51'*'7' •',A,, . *..4,.''re;,'' . . , ''''' ',•,....'''''-4,- '41.,,,,,Y-73('Iwri.--,"- -:.- ..•::, ,„,,:,,,i,,,,..,....,,c,,,,;i,7,:1:4,`,..,t,„:-J.,•,;•.ii',';','.;,•„.i,.:,;6•,;,,j,..,,,,;•;,,,,.0.,;f:t,,;•,,°.„;:.,,,,„',,,,!:,,,,',,,,:,,ti"-..„, ,..,,,..;,, ,,,,t,,,„ , ,,..,p ,i,,,,,,,,...,..,,,,,,:.:,,,,,.,,,,.,...,:,,,,...,,...,,,„,,,,,,,.;,,,,,..,,,,,,,,,,,.,;,,,.:F, . ,, ..„,,,,.,,.„,„;F/, n, , -i.,' •,'..,,,,,t,...,7......v:' , .'i,. ':::•.':',.• ,..•.,i,' :,,,,,,.44,1"-.1'4.i I r.,t,:.,L:,,`,,.<,,h..v,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,',,i.,'k,,,,,I,,,,,,.. .,',,.;,..,..'.::..7-f.,..'.,.::.,..-•:.,,,..,..:,,,,i of.1..4 .,,,,g.:,,,,t.,.„,„,.','.,).:.,....,.- ,;,..,.,....,.,,',,,,,,,,,,, ,,.,,,,„.,,,,,,.,,,,F.. ,, ilii.tf ','..,,,...‘ ,,„_,-.:-,,,.,,-,,,,,,, ..., :1',.-,.:',„,,,,,,o.,. ' ,, ... ,,, ..,s;, -;;;;;I,4.4•• ••:".1',,•• .:,f,114,s'ilt, ;: 'F',•",; 11 t''''•;;;''';',';'.'.'..;7'.'"":"''''.'.;',':'.•;'...',',";":'. .','",'','•'..".,"••,:"•7 ';; .••;• 1.;;,„li.iir.fi' •;•,,ii,e.t.'14';''''• '•, , ..i.,.•;-;;;;.•;•,. • .' rn I; 11.1 __,. ••:,•!...?.• ,,,,,,•••4.;,;,,,-,,,,,';',.", ,,,r • fl • ;• ' i•. .:•,,,,,,,.• • '''', 'ii ; • ' i,7'•'''''';''• ' ' ''''''•"' 41 '"'''••"••''•'' ';"••••••••••. :"; •"";';''",".",••' ' '' — ' ' . ''• • •' ••••; ;,"....1';•p”.•:;.••••••,;;:"..;•.',.1.".•;" 4„;;;‘,1'.\';•.•••?•",'•'..1';',41.,''.•:•••...•;.7",„4••...;;,...,.nr.:1;-,,,,.•......;:•,•,,;;•••:,;;;.:•:••••••••. • •••••• '• • ,-....I • - ' I. ''' 1 : • ''''';'...:','S'''',4,,!•,,.,:11,t.':'''',1411111114''•••V''','"'.'•,• ,• :'1'.•'...,''',•;;;''''''","-:, '.," "' ;', ' ' :• ','-;',1,:/,','.'''•'''''''%It',,..,'''",;•:',',':''::":..,-,.' ,',:'‘''•,'..'',',',..q.f,;S ,:,,),f:;,,,,,:ii.•:,;2,),,,' .:::,Y.:..!-,"":.;',,: -.'-','.7" ,,'.• '''-, ;;" '— 1 '•a ''''''' '' ':1''•,•''„ir';(1.7-'-',;';',"11';' ''•,'••••••••••••• ' ' •''''" ''; •••• .•, ••'• • -' • '. .... .'• ••:4',q: i".•'', ••. • •:i'qt',,',';',.:"4,,..'-,''..,..,,,'.','‘,.....". ':,..'i ' '..,,•.:-.;....,:,,,,f,-.2y,.,;;,.;,,,.;,`,..,:,,F...,7.,.:,,;.•!,:,:,. .,,,,,..,,i,„;...,;%.•<,',‘: , ., .,..,,....:..•,,,,,:.,*,:,,,,:::,.,,,;;,-;,,, ',.:..;:-., •'''-.H..'..'• ,.:.. .,.....,. ,„ ,•' ,, , ,','..,,,,','"„',-4:',' Lc.'' ''.'''''',',.;',1',,',,‘','','-.;',1. ',.;,'".,;‘,..,',...1,,'';e:•':":').',-)',''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''! ''''%' ''"''''''''' ''''' ''' '' ' % °1 ;.,';,.4.,,,,,,,,.',,,.•::,','2*-'70.,-4.'; ?...r.'"..'.'.:1'; ''''''-o': .`"''.:.r,.:". 71 .''..',";:''' ' '', yl ..!, , .*C.s.'‘, '' '.'' , '''',,'".:;',?':'-',,Z14dj,”-",,":',..:'::'''.';',':.'.'.';';',:".:,7,''...r.'(,'";?::.'‘:',';':.:',...:i:/:'• :.%;';+‘:/: ' ',.';,' ,,; ''''-''-..:'::::''''.',.,,;''':. .,'...' ii"":'",i ii',.),'/:::;r.,''''',1'1'6.1'''''eii.".‘• 2;;'.P',',,';',.i''')'.‘,"':,:a''',:: .n, i',,''','‘'7,1;',,f,;'4',',Fi!''''..:,;*;',4!...::,?,'".•Z:.' " '''' .. • ' ; ,,,,1 "....,..;:.-,,:',;.'..,L,'--',.,''"'";1'c'--T':"''''''''''',:'.-!,'..,,',.'%.''.,,.''',:',t 1,;;I::,r,,i..''.'.;'''','''„'''' '.:'''''...:.',', :',.:;!.:.',',..:,''.:..':›'., •,,,.,t, ,.44'4.,;',to,,,9;iiii".,s,e'' ,,':',..'•-`,"';'-"::::''',...''.;"''.';:'•;•''i " 1 r; 1,,j',1,''''(''',..'''''.':''''''''''''''':11:''') ,'.., , •[',.'';',:,:i'L...`,4,'4?,.:0';':',.'l'i'f.P.,',.+6.' . .% ji'‘ . 1 1''''':'•,''l''':"\::.','''.''''''.1:%.' '',':,'V;''''';'.''''':41f.`;',‘;".::;•'-'.,:." t, „,,,.'..Mt_tt5.''''..tt.',,,r4P190.,40..,4t.i,1'..".'t. ik'ff!)tit4;‘14Y, i' =,:..!,,,t,;,;,„;"„,,, -,....,;;,,;,,]:,,",.i7k,...y,''.' '''7:4',.'J,',.:.:,',':1.2:'::';'..:.'',.''';'^''.',,'',[',:',,'.';',,;'1,;.:','141:j1:'?.11,:',..;;;;:::'';'f'", ?..,.'Y';',I,S,<."i;.i.';';')::.$.1';':i41 1.,,'''L.4t •, , i ttN,:',l '!''.,',..;,,'.:`"•'''''" ', '"',.'--,' 4,„,, 4;,,.,,t,,,r .,,01404 ,...;`,1^:6y..i4,,,,,,.:,,,,,,,:iTs.,...,,.',,,.;,,,,i, ..i:.,. .,;:.,:...-. ,,,,,„Api;'.,,,tv.:0,....j,,,,,,h.',.,,.',. ..,:s,f'".`,`!,,,.., • '.., ,*'...„'.1.'',.:.L2,.,,L :..,.:".,,,,,',::,,,A :,::'..-..-.,......_, . ,:,i,, . „..,! •,......,.1.4.1 4.. 4 ..... 7-1.1`°Aq . 'f6.''',3'"'' '•'"''''''''',,''''0', ', ,*.:!."gAg•.1•, ,,,!,44,31X,Mtk• ,',4e'''°J."" " s , ,.:,•".., 'V r..',.. ... ..•;"4.j:'If):1';';,' ''‘'' ' ' s,%.' '.i'''?4,641,:ir, ,...,1,1,, ,- .,,,,,,,,,,,•,.,:,.,,,,,..4,7.gi ,.1,. .,,i,..,,,,,!,0-., 1 ,I •.0,„„,„-,...„"., „ow. .._. • .... , .... _, ......ot . , ,,,,„,,.v...„;..,,,,,,,,,..,1,,,,,,...,,....„ 1.., ,,,,,,,,q... ,,, ,-;i:.-....., . -......... . ,,,.. . . - - • • . . .. . ., .,‘J,.1.i. •,••••..,;,... .•,'••-.1 ul!'''r4,, Lt...- ..' i'P'-g;c:?'.','','',..":','.' '. ':','':;."1 ' ,..:e... .,,,..,,,, ., • ,I ;:,..,...,-.--.-1,,,, .', • . . '',..`''1"..7'.' 7'i ho'Lifi, •- . '-,'','',': .:?`;'''''F,. ...,,,,',--,,'•.'.',.-';ik."4,p,,•'",°•1'it%:, .„,_INIAIZ........1,..„. i 'irti-tit, ,,,. t• • , .,;',,, • • k ',.VI ...,''N,1% ,1.N 4.iI'.94:',4".". •4:4°..,.`,0c!'.'"^''AI ' • ' ,, s 11(?Vo'.4....m...! , ''s ' _411..... 4.L. 1 l' : , ,.. - . . : ' . \t„, ,1,..,t,,,„.., ..,. 44.4 ; 1y.,/..,, .; ......,:::,:,.....„.. ,,, ,.,,, . ' ' ..,,•' , ' 7 .' .", ;...,'l'9•"'"'',AA, I , ',,,, '.:. '.'.; .t i , ,';' ', '.11.,,',.,•..,L.,' e,) .. .'4%,.1.41 ', ..N.L: ..,. ' '..7•,, ' ...kIP,;;4..'1,1? " r.i';'1 ,1„, , ,1 ,,,,'1:, r,,,1,:it..--i.-:•'t,,,....'. '.,,'3.,..."..,;•,,./., .:41.?•,,,P,..,„1,'. '.5,•:''..:,)'. . ,,',41.0'41?1'i : ':' .,, .'" ..:,,,,"•"7',',•.'');.••:"'•','.."7"1";4,;11:':11'd,l("';'••44' . ""4904...• ' • i , .‘,°'1 1•4'S.4,,., , .,,,,C 71 iiC,,... ', ',/......,',"..,,o.,'.,..',,,',:',,Y...',`,',,.''',',,,'...',1";.7,H.,1',,4.<,. ..',,,,,.4 ki.:,',4,,,.,,„vi,,i,-• i-- "i..... .. ,. -,,,,..:-!,,,,,i, ,..,41,1., , .,ii.t.,..,. ,T'0.'„'...i.,-. ;,....:.,,,....!..,',,,..,'(,‘,,,,"",•, , , .. ,,,;'3 . . t pf-t.,,i, h ,,, f.,,i,. ,,.., ,,,,..,,,, . ... - - fis- ':,..:,... .t. .4 4' ' 4' ''./;••14•11', '" 'f'•,",'',," - ''-'24-;•;",• ,'.....4T,'"q",'•,1h"1" •" ' ' g,;,,,,p,,,,,,..0.„4,i."),,,i‘i,,,..,,, "•,',,,,,, ,:.' , , .. •• tit i ', . ,, „ ,. .4, ',',' /1".' i.i';',',.4:.,,'7,.'....e". — , , .' ' ,,.d . ,, .. ,":,4.. .,.,i,' .." .,:,;i2;-"*''' ..-'. "-r ,. ,,..',1,,-'e-'.',•,;47,,i;,;(, ,,..',7,.,„,,,,:c.,, ,,.., .,'..,:...„.. : lvi c 1V:fir''.- '• - • .--- : - .....•' ..,...,,,,...,,,,-. , .•.‘t, • ' tlf 1 .,74,-,,,- .4.,.. ..---".,' . •=.:,-, " . i. 1,..,•.-...:. . r,,,,.4,,,,,: r..z i,,.• ., f ig'f' VA.,'' .' •• -- ' . . . .' : #:,:lr :;"(:11'.." : • •,,,,.',.q.,:it .. .• ' ,,;c:,'--:,•'...‘,:'''"`11, . .., ,,,Op.', ;,,, . .,,!. ;'!.•:•',,,,:' '.',."._: ,:....„. '..•'-'''`L''',1 .vj&i,., ;r,..,' ... .:44)41::.7:•7:•2',. .• -,...". ' • • '''''' ',' ga.1:f'5 . ''''4"..'" • ' • -' ."'I,W0,, '• '-' '' ,Ii!% ::.::, ..",'. .A.i.,,.,:,:,,t:,,.',,^,3.:.7-,,,,4,,,4,,,:,,,,,,,",-',,.*",;:•,,.,,',l,f„,,,',,..;,.,,,.......-.,-,,I,,f1;‘,,,,',•,,.,',,•.,„,,;,,.'",",„:„:„,..,,,,,,•",',"'1,,,,,,;a1,...x,.,„.,4,,,,.,,,,.,-,,,i,',•,-,•,,•,r.•,..,•.,,.,r,.,,.'''':'',•t.,.,;,-,I,-,.--0,•;,.'....1'.•.`t...1'"•,„'g,'l'•?•.r-,*,t,Ispi,,,,,,,t,t't•.,,,„;(.:,i,..,i'.',"z;,'.,4t.-0.4. - 47 44 l . ..- .....;,•,,•,I1,;,'..,',- f:.•,',:„,.? ,• (i .'.•,• •,:•'•', '1,•:N-..,•'t.0 . . •\ ! :,`..,..:1,,•.•.'?.'''''''• . '' "' •,,,,,,•••• . ' '',$.'"'• • l'41.4.e. ^ ' , • ‘ 1 , . . ••& ',.",'•"..••.'••"s`",,,,,, •4-'- /f' ..• r'.-.•,.:"'''': ',•",';,,,.:;$:,:,,',,,,,,,,...1,4;....,-,,••-• 'tti......,.• '' ''' tf.rie.-^t, :3' '1, f.,*,, • . •1 ' •,.)„ • . . "",-'7.,. -- •..,, 3,..,',..'"..,.';',:'':."*.:, ,..., ,,,, .....,',,,',.•'`,•;'.'•••1.'•::,:•••::',-•:'' • ..'I'f ..44,3/4 i 1-,,,''. 4.''.!'.'1,1,,f,i,,,,",-,,,...' '' ..•:' . % , *.., . • , 0 ir;570:1D,'''C' .1..i?:X,[1:1W'''';',i'Cf''''''''.:,I.4:41r..'4.%*•'0'•Z'`'; 'i'• ''".'y a:. ..,e - '''', . '',''' A'14.,);4. '''''''''''` '44,1114'' ' —•....,';.''E';,:':,'..:''....;.„".‘`:,'.',.',7..t:;;i.;"'';•"4';,',..'.,"..7.•.,.1!'7•.'....1;,;;•,.;;,:•;';?•i'‘,'';,''';..,,.';,.k:,.'''i';,'''?.,',,•'','Y,,•k g•k'.4,,?,;,'•",:'''';.'1'.,---4''.'.''1.k;.,"..,•,',,A•,A..;.;;,';l.;I'$;''•.,;,,,:,,ii,(4I..4,'.';.',','.1.•''4';'',7''1.':.,:71,,/,'2'4,„' ' "•.'..•"•..,..'1.,*,',,,..'...'. ;—;•, ..„,;:;.•:•i,",,,,,.,'.,•",,•''•''•',,•'';'.,",'!",,.'...m,•',•••,•••:-,••.,..,..,*'.''`'_••,''.•i;7i k't-. ..„,,.,;....•- .'.'...•.' I e, \ " ' ''. •, ' ••. ••.f.' . • ''''' .' ,,,, , ; • . , . • ..• ig'-'1•';,4"...:Fi.g+,,l'••" . ..,....--,••,,,,:,.4 -,73.1 .i.',0". ',• , . ii,.-1.:4%,..,,,,'":••:,,-•-^-10-„•••,1 l',41..?"0,,.7t? ' ,..,,,,.,oto. ,. . •,...,•,,,i, , , ,-14, '',"....• ,.....,,,,,,„,...:,..,, l• ,fe: ,':"`::".':::;;',:'•:•',l''',kiCi,i',0..1,Aol.','''.•...•' ", -. ',‘:,..:k.•, P•I.V.ii4;44'-....toei: ,:'1 ' . ' :--'':,-- ',..i.'"(i :iri'..'".'.. ' .1.3. , r. • , 111f„.;...:' 111 ,,,..';;;;41-•, ' ,, ' _.,...., .1 , vIrk.,4'1/4,,:". ,"•.Z,14.''.' ' ' 4 2'1'1 . , . • , .',' ''14',:','L,••' .. • . ,'. ,• ,'.....1.,,,..,..,•.:1,..'.j."..':*'.. ..7..;;,'''.,,::,,,f,,,,'',,,7,,,71 410441,,g...... .• . , ,A .,,;,.., ,,, ,,-.,,„, , i. �$9 r '"i'v',r �{S'J"�a'�id ir,n:,L A°ai�,. 7 ^: "� I I v _�, r✓• � ei,Ar � J+T^ ' ltladtt,,,1 ,+Alhub n+ vuwr;+�SwKat- .pt i Z, , .t. +, °r ° �t§.t{rt ;j 4�tk4t.s�,ry *r4 4: `i '' r� Sy M< '� °sr'a +t t,,Viw :, ::6 ,, r �r, w,,,, t,,.,`a'G (,; Syr E +,,yet '{d s 9w 'nt rt x' v,' .� r+ i r -,-4- �s !k a v hC E G s'c r. 3 4 r +Y?t r , Sd+ / a d(,M;� r aFitt r q,.ttlx �.y m�tbhlY^w ,w,e t. �iy . `�, �',��' a ""� �� "t'�3�dy7`� 4a rd • , � A.'•q�•fi " (��i"� F t �; I') �^'' >�. ! St n aad r ,� f u �rru; t t ti � 3 w e�'t i�� . £ P+'� i ��yr':�� !t"f , z,}t �� a,4, f �''� " tl,s X!" n>a 1' � � ..- ^, .w".+ r. ,,,r' S t,,1,1 �+ t•,,,IY L:r JnY d'TC6Fi ,,.,, �e�f�f�9 �'�' ;'v'�':Ii�i'•n '� r,r' �'rr 1 4 • d..i{ 1�.�s doh,�y t !'I r �.Y'• r 1 •�.� .A y y r,r� $;ti v ys+R %•' �4 f r,;t.:.k r�'r � `'� a A. ,•fir Y 14oY1I 1'ul 'S}.�i1bttV.1rp.,. �Y, ,�t�1 1 ..S � d r,+ r,1V'�,` ' ,^h� (y� J,. .4.,:��f"S6N'J1`rs+ ,r':';c ...^:C.s.� ..'e 110 a, u .r ` . ))^� t , t , a t" „Gv�, J' x rtx•u.; by ta` k- '"`"i•wNN: ef.. t 1,:, ,.rt,+. r ,t , .:it s• t.P": ,,A •S�1~, fi,,k ,,� 1. ,„wr i f`s1•.u,'^,ru,; ur,lti? d% `f-,'"1::4 i :r5t Il .. '.�t, :,.�, T, ,1,i.v✓ „4EJ. n. ,i ,,, 1, •-4 d. .le ,' ,'.' �,'d:, d. t it •, ,1P j, ','v4:_ , .+ ! �,� .. �� , ' r'K!,A t e, k\4 .Yrw r�rk �% .J *,i i'`' � .W � S f.V ''. -:� '..;' , ,.,. . . . .:.• .f �r rr, 1. .Y� (�,, r{, /': 5 'NF r , . ,.;.� !. ' .y. l �^.,,In , ..._ .�:. }.: .t , ...... I..G.�A 1. ,",,. ,, �r.«.q .. •Y�iJ �i.�. 5t.5 ��f V �F'�� ',1 (A�'y4'ti. rA�+ A... Ti ' ,. t:,} , •.:r.. ,, Y .""k'+a s"�' , , 4 f1;r s),6. I , : w'< c ,l.,r a k ..y{. a' ..,� t c.. ;�.: <.., �.:P: " ^:,v I: 6'i ;r„' 'Ft- ..f4 r<r:9,x,r •t` 1e ^�ar.,.,. ,,' a f'; 'I�i'.c ,urn . •...z:.,;.£ . .,. •� .^ ,-�. ,,.,�., t,. . ;" ;. r trr I�' ��` +��ryr�th,xl�?za �,�' gar. r. 'y.r �� k�')�'" ?Y}`M`it.�'%:�:�' ny.y�s ,::i• .,, 4' u:; ! v r. §Jr 4 4 �.' +*{ 2` ' G >�' ,sr,' "til•I,ur" . i wr c�1»� .`,.' P N b � w •rv•rr , r l; • 'S V 4 ,f, +R' II In C ppeeYY it, ,^ _ �. ��a �t1 yr � � (r I t r t ,t • • V t RX'n�tv ry • t x.. c �. ry r r9��'4°+i� eq..,ypW,,., y tt i 2,� qv-q. . r .„ '- 'r:,.t„ ;,, � � v d5 ri'\v i tt a .ur.. :.� 4' ,�'� ue.�,t�[n •� r. .. .. .� � . u:g4n.w.- .. '..' ri� � �1'"!• l+;,f ury J3��4'l 16 gF*'R3fvt�3,� +•.' It 1,'��SIN,��,[ i¢,�T .1, 'r� "1 ! F• r;:. • ,.:•... .. 0 'i♦ , �"�3�f., , �'`.�P -,, I. ', "'4--.'. J _�1` �'P�4 •' '� , A!WV $ '.t*,.'7 ',',",' ,tit 1!�4YX'Y! 5 ,;rdca e. ,a. �, P r� • r nn ,. a �i''' , •`.*-1'd.i t '' -. •.4 \ ..•.� d' k4 s a 1 '[. (!w tiy h :],•y"...,:;1'C7,.....,.. m At.. < I i �+.� n.. '! j,��`Aaa��t i�,tt�'' .�.'J^'d ti` ��n. ;y , 5'V,w.,° u.... � v, y ;. 4 .) d V,,. r y W., r,,. JY,,.rv''.` ..e. • ', -', a:.,, ,, t 40 r ,'.,, ...`: 4 SJ, nG �.� .4"'. . : r--', S•n''•`r4.;;�,.'. ,t,A�..i,. .ro, �Nas7 -d ; .; S aq ,i; >.y9�+d'. fl ,d,vq,e ,7:r,...n: ' u, 1va�'SA :ry fy 1 t „n 1:, 4 �. S x waa..,.9rs+LJv:1h.:ii.�fal.Fk,kih� m,x c 1.,,.,ea o.rr,:: `„"d�'.,:F fAr� -,G f ,,� YG �a.. '�+��,�. vl ,, t ,:7„ ,.a.,.r sr . � .;...� .," ,;, 7 J !.. ,a nls, ,,uy.., i. R ru'{;.�� .i,l,.}GS,+�S'.t�,v2�;G„teXr,,n,...Ma:,n, va�r.,ia,,..,,,,.�.•,n ., :...,,.•o,. -,,•:,:a,a,n,s.. ...,�,:. ;s�•t,;,�, , �'nv� � ..pm:' .,�z'^: E J'i��.,,Cy� M1; rl yiw' rw K I .t J..' , irC1a'.e,!�' rr y;.�. � ! yri,� .,.r .t wrr t�r ,b M�yp,,W�C: ) I',.; .. iy J , ri tri, ' rr,m ii , '', r8 , .�.ui t If it rt, } ��r r�F „', , ,_ F- i.. - iir..,.,, �1^t,tpt4,i` ti' 4 r is! u it ,,it 'tr qr • � �fAr ua' ,,'' , «. , .,, w ,, ,, r C". g! >� "y5 � x i 4 �t r nlst�,11 v `rat.:r.+.Y e.4,..r3i. -awb.Y»S`,x.31M i .. ;iil ti./A..haN.41.2*.w a! ..II. a , ,, ..� • AT,}>Mli°�'y5ss.s,:esrtlrYtl;W+�..d uvl,u 1 • / �; , rtrau.x:tt..cr vuvaaW`JtSr�tws „M1 f ' .. .. 4 E r • r4 r t•MI�u 4�'i',V•n,yl -• K .sir .. t .e 'I t, IAA, ?,tµJ r @ , `. v 14ii i ' 4.. .. • t rye q r •�'!,4 a..i�'tu:ri 1;:ti «�d''' '•':,, !�p ,a Y ( •i ',,ry 4 :y ,, rt, szirliflan r r - - ,o4y r ' � ..gip., .rkR V r „�, 5 4., h ( r n t .,Luf , pP'' rV jP' 777 au�¢tGG, v 117 L oP a ..+' r"`r:+4s4 l.r, i 1 , !•'r'n'r r .!"4 4 -G l' r x , a f ' V 1 i�r!7 o'✓i I , F,FI ,v .r e 4�t�r Yo f'',' II ' � ,'+i... ..� ':.t .4 .ny rhr rM � h ( , h:. - • L v ,-g 4 w ak�� 1 ;) �� Aab� 1u3 +�' '~ < n ' , .J a. i,.i°s r..... `x�F,,✓s pr+ D • 4 b°n,V.''a'� tl,•'� xlx:51:;,aal,, +,�; f t y It s,ti. .Rn ,,,,,.,Yc ,I.-'rrt P' ,,, „.• I.,f,r.r b 1 ^nra..„t"tt :yvr'm- '''''.'",'..."';''',P.';'.:". `' ."t wa: • Vl" r ,t.: :r', L•vy,p' ':r, r> .,1 h, U't ' • • n: r+v �:v r.,; ,y: Vh 4• p„" f 9 '"'S "„1• • k' n"', J ^ fiT ky 'cis; :.� ,^P,I%=P�,, ,r,r r w iV 'fi'., « , K'1 u arY, ^) vv r> i L' t 11^. G- � fv ;l .s , � ,K 'n" ,r w tt Y�'•k r M J I:::ei" '"a Y, "fal • �'yL":. ''�Y Y 1' y .'J',r1Ni' 11 a,/.•,,y, 4 ,::51 r,'V' � iJ•F- M1 !Ili: ",�{ �:.,� ,,Yd to`� ;P ;i,;?,. ;�1�� d"} • S�Y l"�r, ,.4 ,, f nr, ,'II 1 )it 'f:1 1, 'r 'I i2. 1'' f.ff ..'✓l' J„ 1v r,A., +.nl t L 4�! Warr: �!N.t .�4 , i`'1" 7, tkNu y-• ! v •1 • • c8'( �:n�@'• a e�' yr: +H „1, ,V,' "( ,^• ,fit ,""` ,rc`rl" `t{ "R �! { •'1 R ^��'f' ;�r;, „„+, r1r, .'1""^;,,, 9t, ' 4,r., , '^r^' 1 rl r '1 �5 'ti'`1 a, Y'•n, 5 T*� h ly' d w` ;"a: .4. rl. ' ! ,rw�nr'" �z� .,c .I, z .o `rr• .Y'�Y i1� • J t '(,, wl JJ r�, .4. .r.'�I� • r'r,. =�' Y. f' A, a'�_ .Jrr a . !''I� 4, lT 1V , ',- ,:'„ „I'ri%•I' , .rani, {xiMf'} 4 L,: ,r g in% t''y,' 1,r'r.,, d'1 ..�t,i +kr L �. ��1'"� t�'- r }. JI ^kt',,, 'f' ,n.1 (5„+yy�g,}. t, :i+,: l rl.. �.m, .r^ rrz ' "t ppi„' ,r, JJ'1' rr' V,., r Pi : �Iri ,M 1' 4 "4' N `'t` 1 { 5 TY ar;::o`''i•,� ,gyp;:, 7�°.u'r;r,"I' t,,p ,:F ',')m I,A. 1 n r,, ,rlr -d'r' ^''i t:'':A, xw' 1' I' n• Y .1 i% h is�'' ''l. .r•: �,., • +Yt P, ,k• ,r - v;1, •.., :r; r F,., I.1%'. tv „1»r:; • it `"'J i.tu irc:rt�y ,'L, • • • f, y ri A,' Y, T,J• .j, :Jv. • - .'1'. ^fur ' fl' :u,+'' LW `4� • JI;'Ir,ran•' p 6' 'fin' : ' 1, r •., ' r'r,' I•• f pp n, F :,in IA 'I. a„ M, V,�j, r"�T � 1 ah l i', ▪ r 'fr'�r '^F .;Lr 1 nt f.`) a { 'IiF".• v'fi<';T K 't,n ixFi QR' '^In, 'fir rv:- '" Y t,•, yr.n':b, '1 du" � , v"1� t, ,.0 }^, wu IV 4 `.,�1 ,ly,. :1 4ai` • S�� r ayy$ «.t: �Iw;IYyMk� • (( rr��ji�� 1' , ", r r ra"' , •. 4., , ., .l. - ,;,,- .+/".I�.*re'aaUrv1•wWu.1Y":s2tdLr:'Rn,'.,sv>. r41tY7N,,.:I.r::'ri�ai;wV:.4+uwAa.w.h ',w:w,":,..iwu,�,:.. t;",'d!' ${I.r;Ji";:r'/:. �'i" J.1,, :`yip,:.,.t ! in :1 ,a y,:.,a, a�:a:r X 1 '� t t' 'A^r'I Y I f rW 1, ,�. f" 4i 1, . - hr Ar. !.J' v• �g s t� ;lwJ' :r' 'r n i' tt i`': ':t:; .Irr . '� ,yr -- f 'rc„ n"�n 4''a.. �Ib • Irr,,, M I� .� %..�: J, "r� a,l N!. rn,r,' , }2.,,,iw t.l .d: k MI�•AI% :J• f t�' d u , , I,: "a i a i: A,,' r 3 'V et iu nW^ ��, Ya� ,fi r :F.�i• .7 5;;oJ t '�.,i' Po l: h'fl:'r br '(„ d, 41 jr,Yi • L f :�1,t 4:1 ,Z w 1• ,d , W ti , s.k, 'n$„ Jrr•',, l• ,'P'r 11 :10 Ni`.,V,t� � ;r, T'z d 1 'i� -' 4 • �(Rr 'rC r, '�i nRt • '.I '.P• •i. _I r�,k ))�W �,T..' k ,L i �y 4' i}" +� +NV V , 'i R J :iJ;�: !1'F .h 'Yl 7 N r �. b 5 4 • a a • • '1", I" a ^� • {' 4 fr C,, :rk:'tt ':1f, 0. ,.lY,I,,T .,':InH N,1'" +:f.V 2 r Xr6'! Y�". .�5 ''Lf F' rin 7a ,/ i"u' rry i � 1' 4 :tA t1. Gf? 'riN 'Y; ,f it li t' r` r;, YLY >r n`„'pn,,, u„t f ( I vi�"u• • • .7 1 ,'}. :i ,a, n' ,,,,�''�,. 1wr `r: ;ti:�r,ii ,lt ,' ,I,,: :v" ;,,eh ,a, �� `'i'' 'iir ,rn: aR a< v ,�' I , ':'it '+7df Y tr, 'i �`4n'' #' S ,4 1, '•'''i'� kti a ,^4„ ;irl> v`f 4 ,.>+, k, JNf ,r '''�'�f, i. ,:e tieI A eY, L s'1 a„'v,v 1114 �'' r" p 4iiiiir • 'K! ,,,r, .et •L+`,c.t:`:%�4a' ''t�, 1 'a1 • r. v'\'I ,q W r'1 r•A+ +H', } F MI„j?� '.f .� C4' F" 1', 4,'i °9"" •.r 1 I`r;! �,'r.', ••r„'d'^,t:.'te,9ut ,a48,4< 9 ',d:r,r.l',.: ;,;yt, ,,.},,, 7Yt. �r P r':' ., k 'r,vJr A1,, __ �•G,''i' 1 ern' ":';,liia;''." "�•.y. ;,.f.,,'i, ` .e,Y..I:IJ . y�' ,,: r�,., , y 1!r ,ma,,y( { .r L, : ',.. .!a":.`.�.. %'4."' w�iaW"FJ j wf':'• 1. }k k r ��y �1� �t,A v,.71,,n P ...i'tlttl y i �, t '.r - "'i'`' t«`3:''iixl,.r.�ldai '�c .f• a:L'f'at"N:,'hr:xk¢s„Yvc:01,ELn: `.rpYuLk,�°a:,,, r,'a 9,•d,_r^�il'*�4 .1;:,' rr.^..,.� _L,,...,,,,R.I,.�, f, y;� YC^`I(':tniSwFfwj' +'�',''"'rxNvw,'s rb r✓�'. .� ,r�4 .r. !:,.. ,•y, „ j (,i to ty': ..t.. 1" �,� �� 7 r,l, /r .J^. .,1 v' , , ,�id�, i;rii; 1�,: ',,)•. ✓rr.'�11 'ir r " is l r., Y 'i1:'r, :1'y''1' i; "1 , ,( li ,'J,or a 7 ••)'. .r}t; jai:: d, 1' G; v"" , q: R,a, awi r :;i= Y., p 7, .6 .`I J" h Qi i� i- I r s, ,�f 1 X `a, 1 1 f' in:•; t :A, f„ A, 'Ir r'� '+l a• 1 Q'IR,'tr'C:�nu "ul, x4 lrl,(''I"+ �': tV iJ 'N r, Ax11{'i 1 Jfi :LII`r'AJ�i Y f i:i;, ,•1� ,a µ i'§ '+mot,o' • � : {n r • ,t' ci, .Pt:. rr ivA!,. I• V w .k, t,y - 'r;�;, ,,::.' °J.,-i A I `,1i.; ';U i.'v, ,' A' l, W1'i'I ,,'1 y "A, 1 • ii' Y„� ^h.,., v'lt''v4' !�r{ li�" •l'.iv e!' :(L> '{' Gs ▪ •..It,n+JLP';l;, i'•' „ N"X': y ,.Y +1i "rt, i,t: ,,41,, ''I'" ,a S'�; •.r•.°„`i '' �I" c''' d.t r,J'I rc: ,Y,,,{„ '.c ,l•'.t"',51., `,a 'F��',, ' Jii ,�,•:r. .yv u 'i '!'` u. {'4. ',\'�1, yy 4"r,It'i 6,t � ,I.r L„ t,r{',p, ;i 1 .II.. .,,h; ;fie;,; `;;,'.� 11 ,1 .� h' .4, ,,'• tit.. L" r.'r":',9 ,'JK J.y .•1,. .,>r" t .Q•"�„ r' c{°,• 't ay' Irr �, h:J. �; d r � ,ti <nre rti c: �li;' I ,r. 1�� • ,,rr MM * 5 x{„ n ,f t,nl':.Iv ",gym;. , r : n� "'�'Yi':.. Ii':, v.l'b ! .r r• „f. S t "aw^++ t 1. +r Yr," a ,J ••: r, • ,w'' . 10 a yr }• ,, 'ia "ir 1' ,r.r.v ef ,;A,,",'r r; '. .e R d, .'Id,,� ;�'` i', •;`Il,a,'i;'`J':`:%! P. '>$', .'f `�' "�pp` „? t'r ',k j'i .Via^ ,r, ,5 '•S:"'.• ^'+.'4,'t'r!:'' "J,'.. A „V� ,i'"1 • a, t� MA, r.l+;'i'i,.�;;I 1, J r:r;,;�4 1 ,2kX •,n+A(rv, ,,c, :; 1•.•: I • :lu'" t" 1'^,`r V f, 1i'!b'i' Y. G, `t, <. a. iG'•1„ •r. tt''�'r•�: r 1" w' \ :rk' d. t u u„d .} l '':Y' •I ''r^u,;i:' r, !l,"rr 4' n fa� , , N'' �^:�'" • ,1, • •• • • r �•J,,,, I vie ='�., I 'S I .1, �` i 1 ).r „ YI, r,.sr,.,. 6 r i' ,G, �1"•' vti:�. +r3, sf , ( 5• l N A. ''1 v,h• 11' M J 4,: I' l C' ,r,',,1,, ,, y4 ,r. r1 nJ 1;,�.,, 'I` r!i;.i'r ;:Ir,ary;!,,:i..,, -y.< "a a, t'» 11 ''s%�'b I , 't• 1 I�, ii?;<: .,1' ,Y ;., Y7 �dit F::'1'' 1+1" :vr�l�':' :r ,r „'��! t;, ,, ...1, ,p,,,`. a J,Y>"� h .pt�r ;'a;: t., ,^ a rt ,k' �, L'f- I. `�'lirl ^Y'rl�''t'� :I "v, r ,h,� '4 'h 1 %� 'Y IA 1'�;ii€: n f ,,., x,:, n�,.,.: ,t ,7 „1, ''shG 14` ,r r{..J 1. ,!U 1 t, r�' i1� �' ,r Jv. :r `�.4,. vtrA �', .F M t• k, rr1,, `, ,$� '' ,, I I r.l h' ,I, Ir,,, 1 r1 I ,?�, . of l,e.' •�, ••J '4, P, 'fl till I <„ .,;r ara: ,n Yr,: "7 1' - r d 9 5 1 -)• A,,.: a, a' r.1"• rt' 'fxl i{ '"v''' .b D s'i n :i C'•. •f7'}:� g �"'i yai`r` 'n I 1 ,Y,: :La ,dC k '1: .1 ,r 1's„ , 4.t fcln�r' �. 1 I �,, '�^ ,`< �' >l ,ilk fir.'",, 't. ( h^, .A„ .I do ,n Ir ,"r, .t n.r,„" t ,� .fir' ,tw ,..>;:< t:,r'1' .k" .�.,;,,. .� S�i: • • M'r M. f ',,.'� f;»i:�,.;' :ter', ":;`n'�,�',;^:: r,Y.',,, �; itr+e t. ' �+�r ix•"'.+.. +'+4 „,J,r, ,,r. '' fir' .�,- L1r.'� ,'Jur,�- ' i' r t„., . N c.A :, Wi;;,, y • .)t.K, I t ▪ L `,is, 'i i!•f'.r ^1 .4.4, "r^;: ,+ ;S',�' r.1:G P,{•",r., 2r ri e,• , ,ri ',Ip, 1 „it',G,p ng':'r I,:�l�•i fit;�F • L '' ,.I' " :nfw F.';l ,,7i'r ,.h,�a`,4�r,,,, '6.1 »,,; ,� ;v n: 13, �.,V'n ,:� �rs ,rta. .w. �1!a l4 ,d2ry J+ I,. e' t .1`d 9 c .,,1 "•r r 1 �r": R, . ';`c' Ili'., �a a` �kL rw �,+ t ,I" ,,:a: air 5�fi ,,J 1�} '�,, , f a r I ,'C'• 'P�a';,': .rl 'hL' AA SIi` ,>�� ,P'r �., t' 'L' •� , ,Y r'1 1' �,I.ir i. � "t a .,,. '•, �rit y. .' �_} [5y. „I' ,A^'•, �'T' 11 t, .1' rn'i,i: ,AT'' r,� 1 t.tA r'• 'r' rM" .f `'i"1.4' d.1 1 T 'I�:l � k:t' }f:: R 'i y: ,,�, '':1:" ,o' ',t'. CU �;1�+ � e1,4'r.,1';'r . ,�`, •t' ,L )�:�:" it:I ''sa;} 'v"^sl 1.)e,"< 'rY +' a �`} .. Ih a i �� !r�.':'1 n Ir 1' "I }';'tk Y, ,I, J � rl Y' :w•r it �':1:1 7 S'�a, u�r "h+° r f l!5,hl :I'i •tl" ':4 F` "T .1.�a t i',�.Y :i) 'i� � i I'.a;, J+- cl'" )�'. r',Or,',";,,, 4,I;'.,n :J'' „t, rt a. .� ,.�'' S: rw„a, r �.H rr i a/�q;l'i b, e l 1p ✓,• 'lit rf � ,It+to,' rlr• W I(C I r'€:! I r 11 r.6/J,,a.$^;'a''^rriV,':� vqq riJF€i1'„l-, �. 't, r�-. .. ti., kr .:lM n(��t`�' �,+IG as',t7:' , r < ,. "r." 4' 's.l .IA' ,. ,.x,r(�rfwi F,"r' ,. ,, .. A,r.. . . a r.,, tr-. u„�,.m,:.r '!rs.mk'',�t3u�rlaJa, sllkls�3. dt•� � G.�i ,'9ryct+„`hr",:+tin, -,:1.r.ar�n...r,, ^�Y,�,WN.:4s,.r.,a.,n;,,W ,. :':�.,«°trT,.,,..t:3�.:aA°r,.i,:d4vil'�11;i1:i'n�C:.a';:'� . `'�"•:;:`d:, , ":� : ,'ei:;G`n':,cVAY 4�i,';«`"^, r '�' n� Alkir II D1LRAY14Ap1 .' -- UEENAY HEAP! bitarg HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD �1 1I('� MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT 1IIJ! 1993 1993 '.OD1 'U01 Agent: Swinton Venture, LLC Project Name: 19 South Swinton Avenue Project Location: East Side of South Swinton Avenue, Approximately 275' South of Atlantic Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of aluminum frame doors and windows at 19 South Swinton Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H). BACKGROUND/PROJECT DESCRIPTION The 0.15 acre subject property consists of Lot 9, Block 69, Town of Delray. The property, which is located on the east side of South Swinton Avenue, approximately 256' south of Atlantic Avenue, is considered a contributing property within the Old School Square Historic District. The property contains a one-story vernacular structure constructed in 1940 as a single-family residence. The structure is of reinforced masonry and wood construction on a concrete foundation. The roof is asphalt shingle and aluminum awning windows have replaced the original wood frame windows. Two non-contributing one-story additions have been constructed on the east elevation of the structure. The first addition, built in 1967, consists of a flat roof, while the second addition, built in 1975, consists of a gable roof and a flat-roofed covered porch. At its meeting of April 2, 1997, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) approved a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA 8-301), site plan, landscape plan, architectural elevations, and waiver requests--associated with the conversion of the single-family residence to a hair salon. The development proposal consisted of the conversion of the original contributing 878 square foot single-family residence to a hair salon; the enclosure of the 214 square foot carport on the north side of the dwelling to accommodate additional salon floor area (1,042 square feet total); the removal of the front driveway; and the installation of a four (4) parking spaces backing onto the alley at the rear of the property. The aforementioned non-contributing additions (consisting of 641 square feet) were to be utilized for storage and as an efficiency dwelling unit. The improvements associated with the conversion were completed in June of 1999. At its meeting of October 6, 2004, the HPB approved- a Class II Site Plan Modification, landscape plan and design elements for the conversion of the existing hair salon to an office, the demolition of a non-contributing 641 square foot addition at the rear of the structure and the existing four (4) parking spaces, and construction of a six (6) space single-loaded parking area, subject to conditions. The following waiver requests were also approved: Meeting Date:June 1,2005 Agenda Item: III.C. yak 19 South Swinton Avenue-Replacement windows and doors Page 2 4 D A waiver to reduce the minimum required stacking distance between the alley right- of-way and the first parking space within the parking lot from five feet (5') to four feet (4'). O A waiver to reduce the width of the terminal landscape island at the east side of the parking tier from five feet (5')to two feet-six inches (3'-6"). O A waiver to reduce the width of the landscape barrier between the parking area and the property to the north from five feet (5') to two feet-six inches (2'-6"). O A waiver to reduce the width of the terminal landscape island at the west side of the parking tier from five feet (5')to one foot (1'). On April 16, 2005, administrative approval was given for the replacement of the asphalt roofing shingles. The current proposal is for the removal of the aluminum awning and vinyl frame windows from all elevations, and installation of aluminum frame doors and windows. ANALYSIS LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(c), and (E)(8)(g) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The applicable standards are as follows: The Board Shall Consider: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(8) All improvements to buildings, structures, and appurtenances shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility shall be determined in terms of the following criteria: (c) Proportion of Openings (Windows and Doors): The openings of any building within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the openings exemplified by the prevailing historic architectural styles within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors to the height of windows and doors among buildings within the district shall be visually compatible. (g) Relationship of Materials, Texture, and Color: The relationship of materials, texture, and color of the facade of a building shall be visually compatible with the predominant materials used in the historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. The following is suggested by the Delray Beach Design Guidelines regarding: Retain distinctive windows which feature a sash, muntins, glazing, sills, heads, hood molds, paneled, or decorative doors jambs and moldings and shutters and blinds. Changing the historic appearance through inappropriate design materials or adding a finish or color that changes the sash, depth of reveal, the reflectivity, or the appearance of the frame should be avoided. 19 South Swinton Avenue-Replacement windows and doors Page 3 Replacing viable windows rather than maintaining the original should be avoided. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation suggest the following: The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Analysis The current proposal is for the removal of the aluminum awning and vinyl frame windows and installation of single hung aluminum frame windows with a six over six light configuration and aluminum doors with glazed panels on all elevations. The proposed glazing will be of impact resistant glass. Repairing the existing windows or replacing them with an identical design would be the most appropriate methods for repairing this building according to the LDRs, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation; however, all of the original wood frame windows have been removed from the structure. The existing windows are a mixture of aluminum frame awning windows, which are in poor repair, single hung plastic frame windows with faux glazing bars to give the impression of having a six over six light configuration, and PGT windows. Both of the original doors have also been replaced. The front (west) door is constructed of wood and has nine glazed panels and the rear (east) door is constructed of wood and is plain in appearance. As the original windows have been removed and the existing windows are of different designs and in poor repair, replacing them would improve the overall appearance of the structure. The proposed single hung six over six windows are consistent with a building of this style and age, and the use of impact resistant glass will remove the need for the installation of other forms of storm protection. The proposal can therefore be supported. However, in keeping with recent HPB approvals, a condition of approval is that the window frames to the front (west) façade of the structure (that are visible from the public right-of-way),should be of aluminum clad wood. Also, two further conditions of approval are that clear glass is used in the windows and that the proposed"munrtin profile is approved by the HPB. The proposed installation of aluminum frame `Outswing French Doors' can also be supported as doors with glazed panels are in keeping with a property of this age and style. The proposed light configuration of the new doors is not specified in the application; however, if details are not submitted at the HPB meeting, they can be reviewed administratively (in accordance with the Design Guidelines). The doors and windows will be manufactured by the same company and will therefore complement each other in appearance and the muntins on the glazed section of the door will match the profile of those approved for the windows. This has been attached as a condition of approval. - Based on the analysis above, positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8)(c) and (g), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation can be made, subject to conditions. 19 South Swinton Avenue-Replacement windows and doors Page 4 ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the COA for 19 South Swinton Avenue by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(c) and (g) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to conditions. C. Deny approval of the COA for 19 South Swinton Avenue by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(c) and (g) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. RECOMMENDATION Move approval of the COA for 19 South Swinton Avenue by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(c) and (g) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: 1) That the Window frames to the front (west) façade of the structure (that are visible from the public right-of-way) should be of aluminum clad wood; 2) That clear glass is used in the windows; 3) That the proposed muntin profile is approved by the HPB; 4) That the muntins on the glazed section of the door match the profile of those approved for the windows. • Attachments:Lotion map, Photographs Report Prepared by:Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner • I i , I ; i J WAL_ /� I I ' I ! �: - f- ( GREENS .Ms,. \` LAKE IDA ROAD NE QM ` �I' J IC. lir POST il - CASON OFFICE j METHODIST T - - CHURCH — cc — - . . a: _Li o I u_ - — /I.E.. i i - N.W. 3RD ST. N.E. 3RD ST. 3RD Si. --Q Cl rY I<-1 0 0 ATTORNEY z —cv n BUILDING I w i I I t `z h i - N•W. 2ND ST. •MARTIN LU THER KING JR. DRIVE N.E. 2ND •�ST. O r . N W a > Z Z cc o > 0 O I W —,u, m 3 I = z CITY > a ~ -. HALL Q Z oN N.W. 1ST ST. N 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST ST. v i 3 3 COMMUNITY J:Zrill oz z CEN TERzFIRErSTATION _ TENNIS OLD ( i?I! (iSTADIUM Mil SCHOOLI1 ` ' z SOUARE _III z NO. 1 i . .ATLANTICC I AVENUE i'I' POLICE SOUTH {1Z i I I I I I I .• ;/.1//1 ./ 1 COMPLEX COUNTY I . - COURT III F HOUSE 1-- > Z w a a l II a to I i • > - : ice SW. 1ST 'ST: - S.W. L ..:::1[__: / ST. S.E. 1ST ST. _ �� > N .. BUGSinui Wi 2ND ST. S.E. 2ND ST. SW. �� nn ; IIm n nn nn n f _ N —iwww— OLD SCHOOL SQUARE HISTORIC ARTS DISTRICT CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FL -OSSHAD- PLANNING do ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE mAP SrS7EM -- DRAWN BY: NPT 110. I -7R,:I 1 .a f } I y M-_ T • Oi �tznf 3 ie t a a'- y } 'v9` 'Yft 5 I-_ jF ' iF--4.-, _ g F i t E a',-,fir .._. -...: ir lI •!--:;-..a?-.1- ,:,,,:r: " ..5 •4 : , -. -irt OA s ::...-..4-.--;•,,,'%:::.-- . , - ---..;:--;;;..74,%.--•!...., A-•,••At----t-•..., . 1,414.-- "%r A--..tr: -'. .- '..."'+'-••';'--1:- ' ; .. : '• -T ••.?',','th; ''''-:;_7‘,. .\":''....-.'^''''''3 ..•'- ---'' ' ''' - ' ' ' ' •i-il' V.-::e-ts.,,t'--,-r,,,m-'91"• ‘e.- ' Ti',---- ''--". -':.1<'1.-•";tikli' - 11:1;,"•'-'4.-'---::iL7 .•,!'-.4_4:21i."?:.t.ff:. • ' ''' ''..:-.. . -4-'1,••••:..4,.ii, .. , -,F-27.4i,:,.,A.t•i• -::.-''•;s.":k .V : ,. 1;•-•:4;r.i -. .i,.-• rw4 , '5''?'.. - •::-1:__„----:-. :- - ---- '-..-A'-', i .,:-' kl:i'i' '.7:7--i-•-••::::,- '',.,'s4.-::: .,' -..*.,',;.>".....m=4,'..-;.;.r. 4 ,v-, .:-,,-; ,-,-:,,,,,,,,..,.,,,:::::-.,::-.,‘„„.---4,: :„.. ''.f. ,,'-, .--_,-E.:_:i1.7-1,..':t;.-;'',':"-.`:-:.;'_::',;.:::--,,--,',1.-::if.fs:.'*-• ',-,,;.-_!-;-:,: •'-';',-:''qt,-, 1 -;,i-,,,:-:,,,---:,•.::.!,1t' -A-,,, ,_3.,-;,i-,-..-•,'_:;.,,,, -...i•;:iiT,-;,.--;----. :_i:: ::.-E-,-.:.:,..f:,=-::.-.,,,-..f.c..-;..-..,:ii!,:-T--',-.. ..--,-,',,..;,....:%=:-.'4,----:- --.4 _-.--.:',V1,.'-',...-:.--•:,,,,,,I. --i„..--.4 V ,,,,,,,.„.,_,,;,.,t,t,,-.,,„.,,,,,,,,,,,,-,,...T.,,,,,,..,,,1„,„.-:,_,7„..•.,-,:--:-,-_, ,„--,,,-„,.,„.__.:-,..,..:!,,,,r,.-,„:1,-,;,-,i.,--„,-1:4„,„:::::::: -•-.,:_.-,.f..:.:--1 --,,, ,--_,-,f.i.f---,7,--..,,,i7.-,',L.,-,-,--f-:,-..-, _.--,-,-.-,,,,,,,,%:-.:,::::--,-.,.,-,.. -'--,..—•-_,.--J'--,:-.-..-.•:-',..,-...-:-,--_,••,f5-.,,-., ----_.!.i.4-:.'.-,2_4A,—i ,,1,,i,:,..::_ :::--,7,:ii:.-,.:-:.!,:.:,..`....:‘..:.--,,g,-"7::::::•.±:.L,,,:;,:::.--fi.,-;,,,....,,-;,,,;,..,:;..-„,.,:,•.:-.-..:...,;::„:,,..,..:::: ,,;.,:r.i,i......;•,i;ifiAt.,..„,1,i,,,,r...„_;,:mt•-,_.-__IIKIQ:::::::,-,-.: •__e."'lx,77::-.."-.7,4_ ,- ,.._•,.--::.;..7;,",.:::::,--. .-,=.--..'=t,•-. .--i•-:.-...:E., ---.g..'-•-•-...r-i•--::.4,-,-. ?-:.''..1-1-:;:f•:-v-'-,74-•:. `i'.- - 4 •5'....r"'-'---CITO'ril. ..se ft74.;77W''''*.S.-,_......-t.74'A i .. ....S,.. .:7.z '4.'''.- . -, -'''- '''''.--.:',-"fl::,..!,*.c.1•*',„A, . ,..,._:::-..._..:: „..,-,,,,-,,,,::T„:,..,, ,-,::,:r-,----.,„.:.?_•••.f.fr,--i..-.--,;-----_-!f,,::-", ,;.,,-: -.,-,-143 -;%-,..--„,--f.N., '-i'l. -. --311i•''--'-:'.'-:(4'.;:-;)Yz:i_;',,.. .-,-,, %- '. . ----‘ wo -• ,.. -. . „.....;T-,--::,3-:',.i-i.--..'-ra.;.,-'-;;-, -•..,,-i- -- ,t--- -...7';' . i4----- -..z-s-'- - ,,,---). --‘,.%:*-*,----..-------.--,,- ..,-- ,---,--,1:-.,.--,-- - - r. ,...r.-.,„•' ,..o.,-...p;.g,,1- 4,,-. - ,It'-' ' Jf.,:::.::-:,;,,, ,,-.,.:•4.- -..... _ -....; s•• . .•.,-: _ „.,,,,•.-,-.---,----!..z.ai.'':-:i ':: -'-- - -. -..-' -:-.-:---2---:::::::.---.,-,--;-:-. 1--f:::'7.--s---..:,-.1, . .-' ,;-1•?, - " - -- - - . - ' - - - --:a---t-- ---- -',?-:-.-'::--,----t-.-.----:.----:•-•= -:.-=': -'----_--:'-;1:::-'-:-:•-: , — -''','-;-2,---_-,,,i'-,-,- --:',f'=-'-:-.;:: :-.--rki-',-,:-:-.';';-;=.;:•::::';.,,- -,-::i ::'.:;:::_..lig, .,,:-::-:.:P:---;. ---.1-':2.--....:--- -t:i-',V-.1::;-J:L-4-i'.- -.-:4-1--. . -:::::.-:i1-7:;'.'.=:'--i------::-'_-,:i.;-.-T----,-J.:-;--:-.•--,S- --,..-',-;-.:,-':-:Z1,4-il---.. ..i .;::. -t--,,::!.:',--;--.- .;.'lf--; ...:,....7.7. ....,,_%,-..,,-;,,,.-. .,,,:.--L',,:-.•-,--i-',..:-.-0-, .:-..s..-.-.---;::,-.--•-,-.•--.;,--::,-.:-''', -- ':-_,.--7:4.--_--::- ---:."..`-- .z.,-.,:.'=".- --:-.---4.-?-;;:-._-•11, ---'t:1$-- ii-,,,Iii: ''----'ik.::::;;'•:,.:.14",--4:-..-,A--.'i---;.. -,:j.::;--,-..-'-,:f,:','-_-.:1 _,..' :-..-.''''`:-.:-...::' :.1..,-.-1---:-.-:- .-------.;_-1-. ;:-1-,-;•.E•'----r''-'-;',i-t':- -0-1 ,,q.-', :77A--,,',---- -a-‘,-1, --„:,,,:,: .-4-1.i-7: *,'-'-')`.: ?:..,1---.-----.:-; 4-.7:::::!---::'-::- .-:,-., -:'.-.:,:::::-.--::::-., :::,--...-"A-.612:---•:::-:-:: '.--'-,.':',:: ,,•':::-:.--.--;-::"-,,li 0 0- M ;-:::'j.",;=g5g,-:',-'-- -.'.:',3--;;t:i 44:-,4!...,_._f_.::,-,-4:‘,.....;„4.:::...,,,,,,,:,.:..: , ::::,,--r -....,,...=:::,-,-:::,,,..--,-,!'-',-,-.-...,,:-.,,.---..:,-.-.=,.,-,,-i.,:.i, --.'4.'!--,-c:-:.:0,-,,,;:::.., .,, •,,..„.,:.:14.,,:',:4,-.. .;-,',',';.•;...,,c:_-,4-4 0 ._, .. ---N41,.-qviii,--g-------..,4,,„„.,,;,-,,,,,,_j.,,:,.,,,,...,.,f;:,:„.-.,„...,,,:::,,,,i.i-,-,,_..,,,.....:1,2,f,-..---,,,,..:-- ..,..-,,... .-..:-.., ..-,,,g,•-, t„,,-ixi...,5,:„-„,_,-,,,.1.13„,„ „,. ,„,..,,,.......,,,....„.„.....,...... , ,•,-,,.,.,..,..t.,-:-- -,,,,, ..,,,, ...,,„., ; ... . -------- , ..,..,.. ,:i...,,L3,,:.._,..i..::::,,:.,„„::, r .,.i,v,t,,.._:.:A,,,,„,„...•;.,. ..,,,:.:::r.,•.._:.„.:::.,•__:,,„..;._,,,. . ..:::,„„:„,-,_:,.._.„,,,,_:,,„:-,_. . . • . 1.1 .,,wit ,- uzr4. 4....„,,,,s.,,.,544_1_,i,r43i. .•.,,..:•.„ „„_.,,..1._..:11.. _.:...:,_.:,:iri,.......,.„,,.:.,..:.,..,„:2_„.,;..: iit „•:1,,,_,4•T,..,,;,..„:„._.f.:„...„,,,i.:144.. ....;,..,,,.:•:,,:.,:._, ......._ ,b....._,..„,...71:2„, .r..„..„,,.„ ,:„..,._ :._:,,.:.si,,,,.„,_„:„,..-:, , ,z`,21-'1k .....,3•i:„,--z--„'...:,• ,,,,-.,i--.I,,•- •- -:-;...1 Y.,Lf•;.: •--,-.j.-"-:-,-7.'.:-.,,,,•,:zfr-:44.-r.?;.-.5.T. :-•:]k:-:;::;5,-'.";:'.:,f-'-'.-';4•,-.-:,,,j-i:-:-.---.-T. ,_ - -'''.-:- -1-;.:i',(. ;:- A4;t: :''-'::1 -_...:',.--,';-:Y%:'''-.-:: : ::•-_ -,::TZ,; -_-.-i .-i-,:::E'fa.-::.4:i ,._.,.--lii,; a .. --- ::('-- •N I:4':-- ':''',...-;--.--:-.-- .f,'-:,',.,-',:4r.,:c,':',..-:,'.--. .,',..'-' .-- ; ,. .'.,,,,,---.',7- f!:-,:'-----1.,-;',.,',,,,-T,,f;...,.-z.'&. ,_.,r._.: _ ii;:-7,._:, .:. . ,-r,;- L.j_7:: :.,,,-.,- ,,,...,:lf..-::::,,,,.;p.,,,,:::,,,,,:, ,ii.,,,.-,:i.,ti!;;F:17R:;::Li.=.---t-----7-:-.7 ...: ;.',,' ..---.:.,-.-,. ir-,-,.., ,::: - :.-, -- , r...,,,,,.-.1,„-,7,,.:',;;,,, ,--ir,--,s;:-..,-,-, :-_-. .,,,:-... .-...':,..':,:-...,,,,,,:_,-.,..j.-5--,:,--,-,?,.-.,:= -1,,:.: ;irs'-..-if:;•:',..':• ,'.-.--1 --y- ,-.--,. .,,,-.:::-,,-,...-.:._--jr- -,,:i.„..:..,.,-,,,•:-...--:-.-„„..,,,-........,.--,..._-„-:-..,:,,,,,,,:„.„,,,,,..„.„.-„,„ . ,......„, ., ...,... _,.. , .._ __ ,, _..., ....... ......„........„,.....,,...., . _ .. . • ....,,,...... ...„,,,.._ ... . .., . ...,,____,..,„_„_, ,_,-.,...,;, -. .,:,:i:::'4,,,,t: .1, - !ii,..,..,:'4'-,•.-0,-1,..,!..1-...:-. _- ,--,-,,,-_,,:-_-,:,:.,,,,,,,..,...,..,,,:-.,,,,,,,,,,,,,-- -,:-.-,.:.T,,„..iiri:t-,-,,,,,,, i r Ii 7----- --__:---- „. .. . . .„ :...,,,,..1.,:.,., „. ,.....„_. .,„: ,,..__..„__ ,. ....7. 1::..v„,_;., ..„._„.7 „ ., : • :...A.,,..„ ., _ „.,,, ..... ._. . ..,. DELNAY BEACH DEFRAY BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD gi MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT IJJ1 1JJ3 2001 _ 1J93 SU01 Agent: Gary Rice Project Name: 33 Palm Square Project Location: East Side of Palm Square, approximately 270' South of Atlantic Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for a change of exterior paint color at 33 Palm Square, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H). BACKGROUND/PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject property consists of Unrec Lots 61 and 62 in OR1182P32 and the north 12.5 feet of the parcel lying south of and adjacent to Lot 62, Palm Square, and is situated on the east side of Palm Square approximately 280 feet south of Atlantic Avenue. The property consists of a 1,024 square foot, one-story single-family dwelling and a 682 square foot, one-story guest cottage. Both structures are of cbs construction and were constructed in 1938 in the Minimal Traditional Style and are considered as being contributing structures within the Marina Historic District. The property is zoned RM (Multiple Family Residential). There are no recent administrative or Board actions pertaining to this property. There have been changes made to the property without obtaining the appropriate approvals. These include a change of the exterior paint colors, the installation of a brick paver walkway and driveway, alterations to the landscaping, and hat racking the two trees at the front of the property. A violation notice has been issued for these changes. The current proposal is for the approval of the installation of brick pavers, landscape modifications, and a change of exterior paint color. The paver bricks and landscaping can be approved administratively. The proposed color change is now before the Board for action. ANALYSIS LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(c), and (E)(8)(g) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features.The applicable standards are as follows: The Board Shall Consider: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(8) All improvements to buildings, structures, and appurtenances shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility shall be determined in terms of the following criteria: Meeting Date:June 1,2005 Agenda Item: III.D. 1 33 Palm Square—Installation of brick pavers,tree pruning,exterior painting Page 2 (g) Relationship of Materials, Texture, and Color The relationship of materials, texture, and color of the facade of a building shall be visually compatible with the predominant materials used in the historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. The following is suggested by the Delray Beach Design Guidelines regarding: Paint The choice of paint color for the exterior of a historic property is a combination of personal taste, and in historic districts, consideration as to how that paint color will affect the character of the neighborhood. Recommended The combination of colors selected for wall mass, trim and decorative elements should be complimentary and should avoid disharmony or color clashes. Windows Not Recommended Changing the historic appearance through inappropriate design materials or adding a finish or color that changes the sash, depth of reveal, the reflectivity, or the appearance of the frame should be avoided. Paving Materials While, in most cases, brick was not used historically in Delray Beach, Old Chicago Brick may be used for driveway and walkway surfacing. Decorative pavers may be used for driveways, but will require administrative approval. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation suggest the following: Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Analysis The current proposal is for the installation of brick pavers, landscape modification, and a change of exterior paint color. This work has already been completed and the applicant has now submitted a COA for HPB consideration. The applicant has stated that the alterations were necessary because of hurricane damage to the property. Exterior Painting/Color Change The previous color scheme was of a white body for the house with a muted blue and green for the shutters. The proposed colors are blue/green for the body of the dwelling, two varying shades of pink for the window frames and trim, and a deep blue for the shutters. The proposed colors for the guest cottage are pink for the body of the structure, blue/green for window frames and trim, and deep blue for the shutters. The Design Guidelines recognize that the choice of paint color for the exterior of a historic property is a combination of personal taste and, in historic districts, consideration as to how that paint color will affect the character of the neighborhood. While the chosen colors may be well suited for a house situated within a district of Bahamian-style properties the overall scheme is out of context with the other dwellings in the 33 Palm Square—Installation of brick pavers,tree pruning,exterior painting Page 3 surrounding urea. Similar color schemes have been approved for Minimal Traditional style structures in other historic districts; however, while they may have a similar color for the body, they have incorporated more muted and a fewer number of colors for the trim, window frames and shutters. With regard to the window frames (which incorporate two colors in the proposed scheme), the Design Guidelines state that changing the historic appearance by adding a finish or color that changes the sash, depth of reveal, the reflectivity, or the appearance of the frame should be avoided. It is suggested, therefore that the applicant submits alternative choices of paint colors and schemes to the HPB for approval. To reduce the amount of repainting, the color chosen for the main body of the house could be retained while the blue used for the trim and shutters, and the pink and red used for the window frames and doors could be altered. When choosing colors for a historic building, consideration should be given to the age of the property, the color of the roof and other building elements, and the color of the surrounding buildings. Simpler structures require fewer colors and, to avoid disharmony, consideration should be given to staying within a single color family and using differing shades to create subtle rather than extreme contrasts. It is also worth remembering that dark colors are more likely to fade and can be difficult to touch up. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the COA for 33 Palm Square by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. C. Deny approval of the COA for 33 Palm Square by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. RECOMMENDATION Board's discretion. Attachments:Location map, Photographs Report Prepared by:Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner •••• : 1: ) L ' • ) __:_ : 11 , II ATLANTIC AVENUE ill ENE INNE NEI NM MN IMI N ( : ' ill •• i • ..79k: I I I I .19-41; r99 s Licc ;•1950: 1931.,'•7:9•:;•9 WATERWAY .... .. < '' `'''-'. '\,,, :''• EAST. 1 1 I EV D ....,', .,7 :,....‘• ..••••• 0 i 1114.-..^.„\1\9\N2V5.j•:.:.. W . PA.RIcovC.,tOT:5 • COMMERCIAL AL 6nP4 .. 98.; i :•• I CONDO .:: 92 1!? 7 .. . CI . tj zicii6.1.-. '.. ••;,.:, ::•-.4>`'.. -:,1940.,... ..-‘1939: BAR > HARBOURo. ' g:a < < ....„.,1939: 1926'Z -• ‘ '„„.•• CONDO i I ,N-,•••, -.. ..'... ..-.:.,.. :;1926 .1926•- •••••\-;> I S.E. 1ST inr mil ST• . 1.--- .:- 193i. I BUD S i , ,-..c,,•'An.'•••• ',. 1937 = on. 1 I--- L 1-- O CO J , ..7: 1967 • . >- 1953 = . 1975 _ • E, ._ 1953 I. 3 • • .N_ fr 1935 I 4 '1950 1951 7, :-. - w Zi i 0 0 49•••••"•: '-'....:::.1?3, : ; — ¢ :. 1936:::..• ..3.:::192s._ -•::::1937 •:•7-1 ;•••i 3 I :1940 ..S. li.' 3938_ 1940 ...:.. It , o ,- 1: II 1947 .^ R "1975 1993 '1 i E -vg24 ::.... . \ i .'1940 ..?„ 1 ....1r",„„„ 1953 _1 :-.... '..- I 711 S.E. 2ND ST. 1 -) ( - =4 . • • I i•L', -:- 1942 1954 • 1948*..k • . 8 )- . . ....i:.•1950 : I __, SEA GA Tr= .1922 ...1. IF. 1951 : .:?.335':', /-- TOWERS c...D —6 _ 1959 u, ... =-- = - 1937 ":1 :4' : 1935;..: . :: 0 —I 1 :,,:,...S.: •• - ••:-ii - - —1 < -'1938 8 i 0 < M •• — <_ CC w 0.1 I ••:1937. •,:::, L.,- 1989 11 I rr 1 - 0 U.1 1-- 1970 ?••:. L.t._ I 2 • _ . ... 198Et/ — • ! . ••• 1111 1970 - : .: 1968 — ../ 1 703 S.E. 3RD T. N c _ • :-... . ! _ .. :;.- - zr.1..,1 1958 8 1:1954 ,‘,1925•>. I. • ..,— . '-' •'•• I . _ 0 0 I , 1947 — 3 1 I . _ 1 MN 1956 7; • —I II I Li 1950 I. -II I - —a a z Z I 1955 E.; ;••" 1992 D — 0 0 Co CO =-:•'1938: _ 1962 E',.Lt`ri--;::.... ••• 2 2 f— I— _ 1953 3, 1995 JO 0 En Z I •. \•19 .ii. = 1994 - . - .0.3,•-• - --- \ .1 \._ IMINE MON S.E. 4TH ST. =I i___...\ ,.. 1 1 -N. /". 1 I I I 1 1 N MARINA HISTORIC DISTRICT --....-- • . CRY Ce CO.MAY SC.03.II- k A -CONTRIBUTING 1950 -YEAR BUILT TOO -STREET ADDRESS 31,.....3•3 lk.20.3eC 00,13114.3 to"REF:13,31.7 —POTAt ILISE mm,SESTEM-- X `� rj.eF �a A . U drTr j {� i ^F l 4 3.ra;',' tta, f.4, „ i,, '4� ,°t'rot err°t C °fi)+wi�, Lr� "P� urn: •5 �t t G �d+ 1� nrY ➢"a14•1 °�4 � �� 4 ,ro Y �� Y /1 i1. i V Y rv; t r �,x'a.:.--1,. 1r.+6 a 9�,�,0•, r7 + i 7 ;'•' ,s ,p s••i..w y "T t, �� t { -.:•rr;,'i� �r�,x 't •• � fa4Y d� 1.�f �«*r4 �f 81 7"fl.+•� r ':, V}r(e(fi,arry}��- fr + )� S• t ,,P 7'„ i 0'..? f �w ,r" ti ?' �,r .k"'r l, vp t y. rY C f,.f o r, n ,.r��y� t =a,r+ c• . N •;' , it w „..C:a .' fir,k rv4 f� ,-j(F�, "'A.! ,1 r^.h J S i + xf Iy fiS'� 'MiYYyt^{{il' *V ; F, P1�� •,t • "BAR k�.' ,Y"PI rl(� '1 1 } A •'.4•• .. tr3i 4 ••l L1'•t: y�P'rr i• ��`, �• ^' ,tl r'a 7G r'A r,r • }'V '� $rM,,"' * 'W�!t�, rva T�:y r'r, • r� n ' }. a �5 1r r fr r,'G"I' ) r q2° +" Y +'t • ""t .! .. {, t.•'Rai" J « + '6 +d r .j v ,}e'' • ':, i .M► �k y ,f�MY, ' �u ( r i�.,•,.@ ^.4 ' S�'M la r.'6 'r.: f 'R itar�•�+! r r J rFy�f�, ^ rf i. r.��s��}� T i rY"e , ,,,,,A''?,,,,t s' ter";'•••ur a M1 w•. r�{- 7' d,. . ) , 1'� "✓J `* F}r,'7 R ,: �hj + b ,y. �'l 1it,;R• �ti. L Y 4 i'''' ,•t ( •1'• y. v r I �r ?r! ,cyN •.'• a4 S?, �, 'r d• ,y. •M,a� 'rg'#"'r d 4 y • 14,• „•.,• r."E. • ' 'r,:,l'•F..i y, s'.''''r S •tp ':.' �iyi' ': h , . * «t s 1 4" q: %•:• p "+ ,• ay e. Cr.;a • a s,� r ,.fin Y w mil, ., k •• ta'n V t � }: . y� �y$f} ,..t' ,.'w ,:,T+•Q'+, ,.i^ µ"�'", '�yw p. fti p,,, -'tt ;dl t t d ".k' '' 'a':l r t p' -r„,., ti: �, ,. ,,,M ,.• ,. 'tl +;°,,•' : 4..:1••��yv•t�t rN'ilR,'f'i,, 5M. 1�'F :ai,wJ' ce • :r ,,,,-' v,,: `,)y. ;' ! vi':'' ., w?'a �) 'J.'' ... �:M;; d,ti' 11.,<J;,:: ("-e "`^L• .r+ h Fd{� z i,:lo: t i r.i y ','`f tf a.1F:i'}:••�..kr` .rat' 1• �` '}' ".� .i;; '�My.;.. .' [lp ti�4• j .s, ail f t 4 z«. w�A .y ''y�,T vrr d .L' y«..lr ,i yr'y 7•_yrr '' ,J., Q"i ,,, '5.... .YY,� .. ..., ,.s .•'i.c. -'d' i y�� • k n7�M•�' "C". ` y n "�i! ti' t h,a.. .., r:.,.� y :,�,,^p " 1�, �'••,,wyt�� Qa=,itr?,. 0tl 'w.+ r s,; .. bY, y • •� ;,: ••1 ...•of H 4'afi'S t,1,y,"•r .. "„' q,,.'",:4V•,, 4 n ,r xdw' w•s it a aA !,^ ,fi ..',u h',," r",,,, e c r:,v} mT�r,'; ,,.:,, ! d:J,y �"• Y•f{!1an::.. ? 4 ;•,Y• .{rr.", a P',.N4i" `9.t�,trrw t!t�""aca',,,rd'6 a "ti, k.�ta� f ";t�,'1,"+w',r w.��/' �•YL , ,:k13»". i, N C Jr ,r}Ll. }^5t' t r tF �' i. ',r�. viY�, t•�, 6 rr •� f+ 1} rT,. '� ,,'' a`J .l, •'el l �.�•!•. ''•y' !! Z[ k � ,♦ {tr- 3 ,.,,. , G ya fi4 ,y .o' , :>.'"t .yJ ad w rgr '` IT .•;r"C" ,"„• •y �M.....• . i r� •ii " o,c^� lift '' e , .A hl'•; -! '"I y 'r x a w 'r<,"` " •:,'.t '.. r ;x:r�,t 4.q,,!!eh-•M4 y'9 {,),�Y+r h • N', :t•, i.,tr "„'S 9 a t ,$,,,l M!r'.V., �ro . ,,: ,+ 1 7 '..t{.1•^c.-o+ •':.R; ": �,,.;.. 4�Q�•�" ,f ' rtt, r d + ,-'''' - '''''''''''---'•-.... .-,-., '� .n t 41{'Y {.•`d6Lr„. •. ., 7 +r}Y"1'•°t . .. .'. y M J l 1 :4 d ,Y,, 'y �W�'4 '�+ i �1 1!Y( '�. �� . •''''‘.' • r.)_; r + r ••••� ,:�..sw.a. a3" _,.. ..;gt9e+�1Y2 l . , J • -.• ! •T''''...•::'.. • ''...'A''':.:',1":i,'''''',,,r::;0. .‘ • a► 9 y,rf r 7 ;, ; ) , '� ;}! i 4d. .1"777'• t'" :M i `4 wY r i l� Ta • t J ;«.,,. s 'rY P :^ 1 f t 1 ! ,o,'i 5 Vp404 Y • • `'wa y y .'• ; a ,, i -'..; +.. •A. y.1 \ t k.tir r• M f�. S a..;.j.,, Rro.tit••.i• "v ,1Zcs s'Q•w J' •gym.. . ' • ,ArSoPit •«ax • .,,w.;s, . V•i s' P�{f�nyyly ,,at� \•.a:it: " •'.s.'"to ,,+ .I...-.•+ C :AN. •• c'��o•%Tr"'.• s, fit t "'a;trptit ..t �i^U, �r, w• 1. :'-•�'C••4101?•,� • ;. n V •iis;r^ • m.p.S..i.A•1 Cri,;l-.•..$;. •+, .,{' r .i '!" �PP�{, , ;5, , ('' t..e. .t.,.la' A r:;` f•-,•. y,*'> . s•^':.r r Z,, ""` akw" T;', • ••• •,. i�'•,, Sw p er",. ra.f• N i•!W,.r;d �f '�. �'^1J• P'G" �,r. •. stir«r• r•��SS{,`"r^'�C.�{�"" F �-71�,`U`,, C ;t•n f fJr4� Ott { �,r r <'�r " :Y r.thV4I .i.' • .. 1'k ♦• .. .'?,"'^r.fir ,•,mate µr!'�-t F)trti:.j,1' { ••,,� v ,r�+'r°r'h ? ,+�!ris§^�+t ' '?, s ' .*-. „,11,55;p.P '.k,.;Lti„•r e /yr pA a ,,,,. '* ''•a .o r*P,, 1 gr4,,,t P ,�,,4.. Yx,,, ?i3Y•Y' '� ' Alt '\ •,niw Vrr,y 1, di .. W' .'.4-.i i• t n S'1p.'.,... "�" ...t• G•4/t"t�r. 4y r+y:E �1r SSl w,)It'}.�i, �+ «Sb". � ; ..• "' Y a s. 'a 1* ro a,..,,'? r w W �,M J" 'yj • � •,�, y�,+ • •+t++• • vy..,. t`.,�J�w.ntt�,'� wrt w� ' � .,A,1:e"'� rti"4 r. a. .,ntU r1'' ..ryk'`�w ..a: tl.'' 1.:-:."' rr1.a ". {' i h- •vu", �' '•'d'r•' , .,v„r,}i,..t. , S'.t,r a•kro6 r.:.a ,"•r.,s:...}.3 • .'i!� ,L .1, s ^..,, v' , trk;•; , t. r; ...r t� rrt �Sr r! k. + R.�r•. r'^F....•r 'ia J� �y,.r.1.-vu�)�'�,. + ;y" �9,�•' dC!'•" X•,.'"T,r. p�. �.. w• ,:x' a ,•'t 7 4 Kk t ,�'!��',r"u t,x7;t,�'�y�,c 4+��`'�, ,^`ti1' , y,:'. ,� .,r: ., ^�� ~y' 'f ,� ?,,n"��'x�: e.' s' sH`��w�•�.. �`+�` .. l�r�• ;::c tl .r `1...k:14t''�h,- r ;af: tr •.",aW ''w .,'et,„ 1, �X; 4', 'N A14.,, r ,n ,,, ., eyI ,,irr •„ .,,..4' L I,,, ' r z. ,� 4td'�`' ,, r,:me fir' , ,•u,., a'• f ,y r ,..4. . :„ ;',, � ; M, Z,' I .{" "•`ti. 7 1w , ''' 4 ;10;Q' :r^4.•' .r Pq `.Vri " �`^``aa"N At ." MK +4} 3 "? 'q 1YI74. .. r"« ..;, w "r,?,t,,r, Y' ;'1:.,,��ri. !.t. t,q":: 1 � ..} rr �''. ��'... )��'',r.'' � •7r:, f•�' V""•ii•; ,i,e �.. � •�� ,t,«. �' .,y ;s ' " 44•• ar t4' 1' � �, M, +,, 4Nx,-,3r t •'"''' ?+F •o,E, „� kw,,.., 13•A ri:'`�1 :•f • +. t p U;f', �.• ,,, R � sr ,,¢ .rP• y ,,,E' . •.4• .'7•.+ •.1,:"Is -'•, ,•• y,.' ,� I•y+! >•" �p •,'; .t ,'�.� ;,1". ''� �'r f tea TJ�, ,� 1� `e ,'"t�a'b'+�, l•$ v, •�+3.R r ti��, y t,':,, r �E ��< I' r't. f ,y.«„M^'»'�Y'; 4.e ,>,,, 4'Raa Y'.�.y,. '� '�,. .OCay .�• r. -„M, "4�t' "i '..'J ,�' :a "�'�•" ^',; ,�'.,,.,'.'�i�"?! ,y�;IJ� b:•.. A� �'. Y x. ,� �`� � •�+kr„ 2.1 � M r,,,�w.JrP.;w�ne:1 �. J;�',�, w• � � «. ,rr y',»..'i'va, W'r!a .�� s p a�, �'�,.ar,. ".s, ,P"' � ,�fc�� '.: a, m.',� .�' r n a �. ,,r, �,' .,,, �� ^'+��. t ;� "�.,. 4 Y �," °r`�s,"'5 ,° ` R rp{�'S� a �'"'i�t :fi ^+,�ya,kA•rt+�u� �!+y� Ar,,y,..+. �;, �.',q r rr"1:,, r,eT, ,r"r X .;,, ;^P tf :}, •.pp TU s�. °' y !,�' .i�al,sGti •'.. ,v.e.-aMn'„• --,�.."�'A �'�•M �.�" a i.' rw'J.�r�,w�. .1.i, ��, y. � wF 'R �, „},' f ��• P^.. f ..t��; _ Y t�" 1� iX. �f' w. �, ,pFl,... "�;'F... ;,.s,., tr:i, /f�;++'�{ .� -- ��{+3 ;y.«!,� 4„",L�y"1. w1" ,R.: R'!". e.t� ,M!J � �� '� •'� ��. ti":^L1, ,w' t �•N, r��,a },.,a,7�` 'f,. wati�� a. �w r.,');coL•9 ,-1. ��Yd,,n` y tt. x ,,:.si , '.., `�'„› "7f +, ««t4, .r•+Y7" :,0 .r� .1 of .{�.7'1t+.,,,•E. *. ., . : � k• k'••• 'I�1*t^L; R+�•i��`.,R R �6r,t"' '1.a ,4r,.It:'+!'a �;l`""f r �1'�4'`•ro.+ r' T'y7•:�q.�y v.w"'?•r' 'ir•;. .. .i^ •• 'v ,{.`p l 'FC rt•'..i ``•1'f�'F•.+rt'6r�''..,v`l';f •.1,� r i,,,+„ � �y r �,.?;�'•'� �, '«!�{ .E .J«.�/ '''P,a ,r r.� rbr':S�!�k"'/E' �a". ,'A! li^'..' •1, 't, •�i�,f ,,F: �t�ir°• „o R.,,;.'• w'J! K .:',� wM"l,,pi 1 ., �'� a�el'1' i•a"x, ':wl:, .'�" �tw ,r4, A°� .l: fA'• .�y. h!" •� ,",`KI r r.,.:,r� r r, , .•>' '��'.Fl`J r. �MJw, 5,r .7.',�, �' f^ r,�r ,,A9 �} l .../ ` ,,...1,♦ a�� r 'eat, 4. e,� r M i A V ✓r I'r a.r ((A' `?',.� :: " ,.,t' .�... ''""' -'try,,, .1.r�.,',�•.t+v r l• ",_„+..��, .r ."� x, r.11M ',r ;,., Y+ �r i�? 8•,. �'f �1 r�� -'•`�,, { 1 "!1� { r e.,• 1.wY,�:.* �• A�,y�1. Rar 'fa ';N",�f. x> fi Y, ai K a"• -r2•f '*� � � s r ,^y., U, � 1 r r ' 1's k • l� a•Nq�y��`/J r� �,•Y+i „G'1'.n.f �"y%�rti" �J�,r � r .(y7��«,, �!„ J �' "S�i+r� 1 ,�• �.s.C' r,. + - � �,', LL t t 'rC I ;r Y_/ :: �( J,".� V -N:� .l" '�. 'fM, .i �' �ta�. ,Y'q•i- '1 ,°' ^ ! \ ^�' ! fr w Yn 'l'F. 'N. z:f7.i 'Ki �,V r'f�i5 y "•r Fu. T w^�'.`-k'lt'!r' Y1j�nie-.` r!', n,Z..,uZ6' ,y^: ;j .. t r :f f. i ,5 .. 4, '.',,, , , ,,2 i' ! I ..' i,;.'. !V 'w�..�,.- ,Y. : .4.�'i),n• to .,,,y ^�t+ 14 ♦^'�'r. � t ' s Mt r r °,n.', r t Y.; ;�J, y +..,. �� 'k`A. ,,,7 � rr'S 3 ,fir .1,..�"Y r .� 7. e�,�; d, M 7� n`• (.l, fit;, r .r.., r j:'i: t ::;r•. !Y' Y �,�.•. rr,,. !.; , !,•. �.,�'.',d'' .t.,,:d" e Yy. 't nyro d' ..r.. v .� +, f }��, .r A t { ::�,, r.a `^•". ,r. .r ,» ',,. tN ,7 a. rkx. r_ •b, r 1 w �� +4 a r,'.. f: ,.. ,riw'^'. f:,d4•C....'y `L ..::w ,p. •:in JY' ry f x ``,w,. { rs 4:. r><. h Irr. J Y r,t ;t r.': �,r 1t', r�r,: �" iE��'W� u� ,,.•,AJ�'",.. "�.-' � .•. ''.�.: ^r�,.yt,,,.. I+}+F ' :�, ,u wr::Y';: �•; .: ,wl fr ..;` ),, r 1 ^r , i t t ;,�Z+'F. a r„ � ��! J 'f- p� �i y ,nj�'„ ,..r ar..r� r. 1`a''!i(<" a:,h,,, r•y�, .�d l ya t r + w..,•r �1' r, ! ,r r Y ><Ur r `V A,.,.•?P tiW' ,I.'t il'.°trw, , +Y",r ...��ji��y,,��ra",•by�.M ,. :tt .3!�ftl:rt�.�r� rr ` 5�^ v y tr •�f ' i r, b rn .::J;i ,r ,:n ^.t • ( h, Y`'a,:gt'ri.a .tJ... ` a t + t r.'.,, 7.7 4 '''f:: - ..0 :'rr. V J ,d ... ,i S, `.a. w, r.. F I s: .r „r, 4"', •r.,.t.., t.,.., .I ,' I , ' ,. .• ar ,17., ,�'��r... ..: -r4..,. e,?.. b,+6A t .n. �,:, o-, wI,Y1 i N + ,.r ., r. . . ;`. r .,x, l ` ..•Iw✓ ,�4 ,'. . a,.: ,�,R ,r, s t, �,: r �,;,...r. t ,u 7F s', t r a' � r .a^ s��.. 4w+ ' ;';,.'t �,,.. :d...• +" �,akrY, .a< �, , �1.,; r n„ ar ,,i: ,,., � ,...., .` .� . + r Jk i, 4 , 3.., ,An.... I, I'ra'4..•': ,,,_v:.� d ,,,., ,,. ,,r :,, .I t 'b r t ,.�".,.:,r ,� .J. ,T, ..: ...:� ,. �...,... .,.�, ..:.-..1:.. ,..:.-...; , M.,,. ..,";r.k .,:.4_.:�t:.,u.t :: ,.. ,.a•«.d.:': ...., . ..« ... .... ..• ... .......... .... ...... .. ... ........e,,. ..,,.. ....... a...,,....,.,.,..n,__u.,..,......w.L..:r.�� ..,•.,.0 ...,_�.w...,...8 . ..r.. ... :., ..,;.... •..'.;",.....• • . - '••3.3.,.,'":. ' .., . . „ . • •. . . . '• • • • •....•..::'.;•.:• .,•.•.::•,.'.s.'...,•:•. • . . - •• . . . •••.•;:. .:.' ."'3,-.... . .,... ...•.'..:•2..3. . . . „. .. . ..3.:',,. ..1 . ... . . . ,: .„ ..."..............,,,,......•,,,.•,.-•.•.•,.,- ,.1''.•-•-:.-...•....,',.-,.•.s..=.,•3.....,,,:,',.'"•'.:;;..:$i•'''. •, . . .. , .• .‘,..., ' . /2%44.. ;./.1)".$...,....... . . ., .. '.. ..,. .,..--•,,,-•:-,..•:.-.I'3,-,....„,.••.••••••,.,,,,,..3..,..•• •.:,:,...!....,.,...3.,• ••.,•,.,,X,3:•.,..,V,;t,,,,,„..f..,,,,,..,...', ',„3-.,,,,,"7,,:p „.4,..S, ',*••''' .„. N.:fis,„,. .7.7',,....,• Nt. , ^',,,k . 0%r!,,'".--;"--: . , .. ,-,-„„,,. ..., ,,:::.i:,'1,,'.",,:::„•::":":-.;..:.,..,;:•";-`,',-;:,,,•-.- .."--,',,,;;:',: ,';.&.•;',';'-',i'r,?,.:‘V;--..4",,,,,/,,":"',;,t-t.14,,,'',..t;" . .', ..' 49,"," '..4-;',;,J.[! , . • .. .• , li,'','' ',,,:7i.':,,,': ''... '.''''''''''' '';'"I',..4'1-::'''-;.•::'•:L'::(‘*:;i-':-:7*;:" *:,7- 2, 1,4, 41`,4A1:ii.'',,X ;ilic,.#4,"ti.S:A;r4.„, tji!1,:i.'t":"•:,:;%,f...!;;Yi • .:'.. •'':'1. .' „i•4', , • •••••:,•'„•,•,:';',•,.. Z"•;:"Z•,•','•,,,C,,,H;•''''''.',Y,4. 0:',./71,,''",:tT•11•1,,''All„'',-;,'.AV 1 l'''!PW74'VII' t•h!'4‘1, 1: ' .' '''''•'''''''''''''''''''..1iiik'''''' -i,-"--, ,./,-•- „ ,,it,..a.v., il •,v...o. . ,..:„3 ':,.,:-.,, 1 3--.':-':',3;:';',...i.3.i'.:•-;:.., '-%, .'.'' -,..!‘•,; .,,,,,..,, ,,2.,•.-",•*'„..,.:....„..,e•-,,,,,:‘,y,.....e,':.....•,'3 :yk: 43.:p.,,'','''39-:!.;,;;;:':•.;e3 y 3'''' ''e,47,114,;;',•,14'.•!, 37-3-,.!:,'3 .33',,,:„.. • — .4. • ,''''',3•.t!'..:"....;':,', .'"'".;;.;'f•J 3.':'.. ' ', :'' , • -3 - '., -'3,;,,; ‘,.:•• ••••••.4p... ' ' ., „y%,i, • .• •... A,k,, . . ....,e),,,k..;4.. .'',42.17•Y•s ';er,...,-., ., ' , '..• . , .?..-.7 ';.;'', Z:;;'-' 1;1', ,,,•.T' ' i.".:f( ...1.',...;,,,... ..,.:i....,;;, :`",-,;:,,,,,,.;.„,,,,;',,;.;;;',,,,,;.45,,,),,,to.04,4;5' .',445.1;,..rit;:,..'7„,:•;;,, ,;',',',.. f....,''''''4'.;i',:..1i..".'' i'4..E,'":,;;;;A, -.'..,:'%,...,. ,. '','f,'''','A ,.. ... . ',.,.....':•.,,,.....;.:.•5,.''`',. , '',..••' ,-..4. • v....,. ,,,,, : ,..;., ',..,:e. ,• l'• '; I' :., ' ,....f.t,7r,t,..,„„-..:; .%.;..i.,4,..:..;4- /.1417,:,;;e44.-.41tek4Z,s40'.ti ,' S''...,',..p....,-;.2,..).1:'-4 .,9...,..4:',.:.- .. • ,,, v:.....,...:. ''. .. ,.• 4. .. ,..,, , • • i !'',--:".•-•-. 'e.4'•‘,.."(0401% •A,• ,e''''••r.t... ''''''",/ ,,, flt...:"...V"."*.'•''''" , ,'''''''''' ''','''''''Z' ',"P'Ii•••...":,'.. • .,,,,;''' ',":':' • :'''•'',:',4' •JANit ' +*"**' ,,•,?;:,'"'' '''1,:•.?"4". '''....,'',' '''' .• '..',','" „?,„,;; IrV.,,•:.•.•,'•frko,'›kik' '2,1, -i,:' ''''''-•'•:.'-'"..t ':',ta' .'IT.!. •.'''''',''' ii);'',.: !i,,"•1'' • S' j. 4' .,;".. 'ii:H.;i-,,,:":" It'",'-'' . "''' ;- '''"''''''.;"14,tit''''; '1'...1•4'4•^ ...e. '''2'''''.'''''';';','‘5'•4.,',,,,,,,,.H., " ',-4"4:4,,-;:4;:''''1,.4...,' 4',,,.,'4*,.,,,' - .fr,,,, .,.-,, '. •' ..... ,....„.,,., ,.., , , , „...„. . , ,,„ •.,.., .. , i 1 : .., ,I1 '''.::.:;.;',..2.:',5,:.,.•••,,,,7,,,-.;•;,,,-,... .•74.;•••,,,, ,•;•..iiqvf„.7.,,,..,t,,,:,'.4 ,i,..;„..:•„, .....,:•..."..,„:• • k ,' ', ..e.,".,..:„,..•,,,'.••••• , •, ..•• , ..-'-', ".-to ., • '..]:.„;;',..;,,,,„.;c?r,;;;;(#riil.;' '-'.:',",;,,;71. - 4#fi,;:'''-'''' ••.•'`421;t. q •i., i- , • .• I • :,- +.,t,,,, .•?,.-,,..-•'..,;14.,•'.-,--•------------.„..7-h-::,,,,-'..:-.. '."1"0/4004,.•-•4-4,4.,44,..:;''''''". „if+,..*:: . ,..,;•.:,';',:::,,,',,-1 ..":;-..-'1-1':-.,`f"; ••' -'rli'••:',i,„,''''":;i:71,,iii,,•••'',.;,7,..;.,'...?.:.•,,‘," ,,,,,•,'•„",, -,,r-.' i '-" ":(, :"''. ' •,•-•,,,:--- • ' ..!.; ' 1,' :. • , .• 4 •':, •.''''..•i i'...;:'?1.•,`14.1!..r;:•• •• ' '''1.3.,,,1.0.1' '''•::•:F'......'It'.... 1.'. .'1,,,I*7i' • •-,„.......‘,...,,.•".•••:,1 t-.:,...•-,..•:. .:,..:: ..4'„''''-.. ...-- •;...,'' •.;'e.:,)':W#• •!',. , i 1,'... ,:4'j.. .(..-. , " '1 .,: t'A . -.'''',:-. .'-. •'1.'..,.4.,!;:: ::,. 1 f.,5... l,..$6,!,7;---c. ,''!:- 1.."..--..C''-'..'"',."',.-li ••;,,,.'2'' „.....,..:`,,,,,:;,.,,,;,,,,,,N-4'4iil :,,„;;",,,a 4.,::,. -,..•,,-:,..',...-.. , •. ',. ...1;"•;',A.x ' „c4,7,,,, .;, s..' ,„ t---4 :.,, .,' , : ...,,, "--"'''. '' '•' '' - 1 ,- ,..or ,x-) '.• ' 1/ l• ''• -. '',1 ,.142:•:%;'4''''"J"'•',.t,', ;'..i-;,1;4',4 ';.'•; '; _,'..4';, %I- ie.4411,:,'' ': . ,,;...',.,:„.'',4 /,' ',.r1,1.').,,..;'',,g:'"1../ , ;-: ;',"0.itn7;::'--;!', ..M.' ';' ':',,c..5 1 # !Xi-,,,'4,, .,, -. ' ' ::,",:,.%,',,', •,:',.'.:,,IX:'•''':'..%'"2:,,,:-;:,,:;:,',',1,,4::"' .'",..it,„.,40,%"':',,!).,":!:4'.':,i.er..;•,,i',:...i Av i i',.:1111 ....„;.,..',,-,'..;,',,.:. .,', •;..";• 1,••"F,,..- ''''t,'./.it, „ , it:' ,,.17..,.''''g...4...-7A ,,II 1,•01.,P,So.„.','"i'r'.•:•'I''',','"','f,';',.-',i'''''''''','","''''' ''..i'l . ',',,,,,%,',,ii? ,.',... : ,,,.'-:1, •'„••. ,',: !4',,,, -,N.i.„•'',' •,..'444,*,'•"1, 'AP,•',"-,‘,.:'. •'''.'',' '•;•-'' ••'' ''''''''' '.::•!'•"*.•*'d;''.- . „. .•. . ........,.,.,;,,A,;,, ,,,,,.i. .-114,16,-,..,.,.401FW4744.•W`.,,...,,0"1.---1,4.1.,t.,.•!-,---...,..,4;i:; 1 ' . ,-.'.;,:1I•,::-,,.:,,,,.,,'4,,.,,;7....-2,,..:•:!-.,:',4;.t,,!.iA',,1-,t'4.4,,s,:r,?,.F1'';...:,.P;',;1';4:&'.‘...',,,,:..,.-'•"•:,.:7',4•.4!1...'1%4•1.,,i'ii';-';'-•,.''''i'*:;...•"1:F1'.•.'.1.::':",:,.-.i•t" •••;,!', :,,;.:4..-i4".,:5,.:.4,4i,4,,•....7^,,,,.'.y,,qa4 in " ,,,.,,,,,,-,...,•,.-•.,.4,:,,,o•,.•,,i'.,.„!.,,..•..,•.1.„...„:;•,...'-.'•.- •.'.'z'..''.••'.;.-‘:,l•.,,,•.•••.:.•.'..,.••.:.,.,,..',-.-..'.•.ft•,..4.,:v..,,,..•.•.n.'•".;.'4i..-4',:'v..,4,,'•:,,,,...'(,.,.,..•.,.:'::'.,'.:,:,.:,„,'::.:-•,.;,;,.'7.,,.„....:,'.,.-9...'•,,-:•."•••;.•,;.:,...:.,„,,•.,.•,..•,,,,,,,,.,,4.,,,,?k:...;,-,.,7.x,,;,..•?,$.:7.‘.,z,.,1$,,.,.,,.4,1,,.•..,.4,,‘-.,.,,•::.2...,,.,::,,;.,.,„,••-:.,.,•,,•:‘..,•',:-,,•.,....;-..„.'.;-„-,,,,',.•;•,.•:,,,,,,,.,,,,.,;,,.,,..17.„.,..'.,.,.',..4'4,7,1,4..,.,,,.0`.•.,..,„........••....`,,;.i.'.'•..•'''''.:.,..^.",4.,._.:„",5,.4....-.7,5."„4:,,'*- :-,;.,..4 ,•,-1..., - i ''''''"0,1‘•.':,.<•""ot.,:''''''•",;''..'4'".;..;• '-•••-.1...„.,;77..:*!'71'''';','i;P:.'f.',•:. ,„.'f..W.ifi-.1:11V.e.4":,..=,:,•,...,::::,-,,,-,0<:.,IN,,,, ,. t,,,?,,,,,,„, ., ,,,,,,,,„„,„ , ..... .4 -'! ' ! .1 ,,,,,,,,,,,;,,..-..:,,,,,,,,,..;,,t,, ,..4.:.;„;,,..;.-x....,.. :',...",'..!.:;•,.. --,'.....,'..,...4.,...... ,„::;.',.x,..•...,, 40,,ro,..!toil-, .„''...,1. -'.1 ''....:-:'-'.:"...:,•,•',., . -N.' ; - . -• --'.,,A, ,••,.". ,',:',•:'...,,:_•'•,:',:!-..':... ''',"..'q-71'.•..f ',..:.:;,',.;,,.•:'•••,,,.::.,:...,'2,'„•'-.,,,••, .,:-.'--,•'.,Vr-,!:',;'7;"•:- • • ...,.-lit,1 ,..'‘..7,44.,t,:t,:k.i.':;4'0.111;ti.i'r:',. .•:,; ;;',%7'.3''''''',:.'''' - • -:.',',:,.'4• 4<APN'.,,:%F44,141.444.. . ..., AO .. -•-•• ,:.,s .'/.' .'!.-.. ,,..- -4.1,:.''',',..*8„,..:,: „0'L.,... .,,,•• ,••.',.;‘,.,,,.,:•-!,.T..',',...t•-:',. ..-..•,:,,J.„--,,T,".;.• ••, :::.,g,,,+,•'„4:•,,• ;,-;-3,,e, :•,,.•?;ci,4, ,,..;,•'-• •-•,•-•::.',,li'it ''',11,'4i.l...,;•,„'i,,..,,st'„?.:.• t ,,. ....: .: ,„..,.;:..,..„:•••!, . ;1'`i,-*.4 - '"' :.<-•.--. ,.'''....:s.''.:•,#"4",...z' .".):.'.' ...',..1--,.:.7%,••-•t''',4Z0,7•"•;Lkt,...;,,,vt,,, ''''.'";','' ‘"'''''''''"''''''';VY :.,...,•,;' ",;,,,',', '-;,'.,;,',,N,':,,:;',,,,j'':""',";•',.7-.,;',,.....`,:',,,:',4:144.',', f . ; . ' ;, ;. '' '':..'',''' :;'';''4,1'.',, "v^t....4..%41,X;','' 4;' .f.'','''•;„.. .1.54.;:77T,V"'/1;4,0'i, ''..4:`", ...• '.,i,.1'•r v---.4••,..4,.....0,3,J.,, • ,, ,,,-,., '' ''' ';'Al f•'.."-"adIns.'''''111••••'''''1,1114:1"'''''''''%', '''''''''',.;,v;.-',',..-,..'',3 '.,'","',,,"„':`,,';',,:'.,'2",;',,,,,,,,,, ,P%:„",1•,„,,•,:.,,,,,,”A ...%',:•14P4',% ';'" . . . ''' ''''':'%''''''',,,,':•:::':''J',-.'"'''''''''''',.'',',Y;4/64. . i';70‘4,'.';',%;i;',:ii,,i "'''''%4/17..•••'''''''`',4r,,:•:"."..;''',,!.pp''' •••':•,,,-4.i"I`.1 '''' :1.41,„..,l',„"P•I't,•.;,4,,i,,..!!',..„:•,7,,,',1,.1,11:;,,,'','„,,,,,I,',':‘'''''' ' th'1',.:,'"'",•,',41;4:,:',,,,-;,.'>"`',';'.:''''''''''':','"''''''''';;''',.'''','':'''';;'•';''••'"'''''''''''''f%':'' - • • ''•,,%;'' ''"Yllka'; '''',7',4:..•-",:".....r.,;,,,,,,e'..y,'1',„'1,,;•:7:-.,;',"P•,,,,„.,..''',•• .''''.'.,!:7:',';';:,,•,,,,,, ',',*' ",,;,';,7,,-Q."',....,...,,,,,,.,',., ..,,,,„, ,,..1,„,....,,,,,,,,,,,,..., .. .e:, .1:,,,,:o.i,,.'.;7„,*„717'• .2 4.,444c'4,0,-;::::•,,--,"f,', ' ' . ';,-,,c-1--;,'Ii"'.. ..',:,...;;;:,!-,-.',2,_,'",....;,. -... ..,,,.:.L;:.. ...:.,.,,:, . . , , , ' ',',-",".,::)::',.f".0'...''',4;k1.,-, G1-44,,q:'•17:,......".",',.;',....4..0..r4...,:"...",,;....,,,-%-=_::.,.. .' .,,,,,..,:,:,,'., ..•7 .r..14. .,.... ,,, ,... ; •. .. . . . . .. . .• . .,. .,. . . .... . . .. • • • • , :'',•:'-',''. . .. . . • . ., • ' • • ; . ;• ., . ,,, •,.-, • . • '..• .. ..„ ' " ,-„,,1,),,:5,;;,,,,,4,..5.$;;.5... . ." ,,'."4,-;.",E,'...', ' ft;' -.' ' '',. ';''', yilil'il I.' ''''''‘,;:5.' 4.,.* • 1,`14.4 . .i:5,..., ;"-',"';''•"'-';''''''''','''''7,'''.7;','''''''.''''',':',L•','l'S''','"ri,!'!"..j`1,'•'','•'••''';',22:',,:•Ti::,2,••'::,,,':';',,,,:,-;,, ,,,•;?'','•;',',.f:',:',,':','1,,,:,,7:'''',•:•,',:i3O':"';:i''KTW''''''''‘'',k"'''',?;:",''',";';'•';',;•"4-;''',''',',,,VV•,6..i'.•':"',',";•,',' '•',k. ^ '''....r.10' ,' •,•••',;46/,00.4,11:!`,,-•..4.— ;'''"''' ';'i ". '4 ,A,,.,?!.:•••••.,..„..,,,.,.,i r,, •.• ..:-.- --•,::;•,•;-,i•:',:,:,-,:,,s,"-',.•..,;"„!.'.,•y•.;••.,':,,,,-.:•.:.•....,•,,-.:;,:.•,,,•:,,,,,..,.. .:,,.•;„,:„:":„.,,,, ,,...:'i,,,,•-',.; '..•:•:••••,.---iv,,'-'),,,,,,,,,,,,•••,,,,,,I.,,,--,:•,,,v.•',:,:,,,,.•.:.-iq,',• ,',', .;.,.,::-: •;,.•':,,,q,•!.:•:,,N,:-.•„•„:•.,,,f..:,.:, , •- ,O.11 i .,',';'',''''4';',.' P.',',,'''''.•:',"% 1%L",., ''' ' ':' "0" I x., .-`r$, 4,‘::r'''Jr'.4.,.' ' „ ''- %'' ';',''''' ''';''''-':":"":,''''''Y::':1':‘,:'' ',',''',,.;;'1,',',-,'",',,''':::',:'r f:',Vr,'",':::,,-:::',::::::::'4';,-,,,H, (,.!" :"%;!,:.:-,t"„':;:f,,,;•?:,,'.4,:',.:;:':'.4":::, ,,S,',;',', 4',,,,,,,,,,.:.':,,,' ,,,4,-,,,:',',„:"T:'','.',',.,f:,•',;:',•::%,',,,',',„!',.:::::,.! qsr r ',: , .,•,,, ,1;,,:::,:,::::,,:.•,":,,.',::::.,,,'„':::;:,.':',;,,,,,;:'i,'•,',;.,.,,•,:,:::':;,,i';',„;,:,':-,',:;+,'•,:-i' :',,;:',,'''''„'',,.-.:,,,',';•.;:,':•:'':',!,;',:.:,;.^..A":"';:"::::',,,;4'.::.:'.'''',4t'Vl.'`:',i.;j2:1;:;",:';')..'/,';',5;,'(-,';',:;::,'',•'•,:,'A'4 ' '', ''''." ,',,v.,''•,'• •',•43.,";;.,,';','''' ''',.;;;:,,,,,,,, ,,-;;;;;;;;,,,q4';';',:;•:;"44;"."'''';''''',...,,,'....'4:,;i:',..''',''1,54';',.!;::5,,," !5, ,`;',-;;'?'dei' '..' '',./ii4. ;',';':,",?.;`,';',4",',41`,`•';'i '-',':''';'''''',:,i1.''''''';',''3;;";';5',1;::;'';.'':''.'",,,'4";;:;4'?":::',".;"'';'1,;;::-.::,,,,,,''''',;;;W,•-;;;;'.';';:',':',"?';:',q;',''',';',,;;;;;;,', ''',74'1C4;;,'„;",:;',.''','"'''''7'''A,44‘`A;4,,X154 1 A..10'.--......,,.;„.,.':.•,,,',..,-,;.:1,,i '• .-.-•-.,.,..2.'„,..'--,.•.-::-.•'.•-:,,,-..--,-,'-',..,,':;;;;;.,;,:•;;;','L--',Y;;.--:',V,.'`:',",..;':',',..f' ..'tv.4.6,' • .c.';',-...;..,..,.'•;..1 . .. ,.., ‘ .i-7-,,t• • .' s'" • '." ' ' A''' ••,• ..,•-•••,•,.••,,„,,,,.•' .„; 4.4 4,t,'''.;,',.:.'',: '',--.:.'.„,„'.',1',`,:,". '.„.'.'j„,.'„i!„.„ ,„,'•,'„,:.„,N'I, ..rc..4.1 Pir'Is.'17,! zVP::•„:1„,,,.,;'''‘•:. ii.,',."-4--.,;;;•-,''fv,••r.v,7'-'',...•'•''-• -.'"' .'.;:',,•:,.:,.•;.•,,:.,,,;1•'4,-•-:- •:,-,',;,.,.:0-,...,:-.., 'I, ri,-.‘,., ,. ...,,. .,„ „ P".. •s' 'o ':, -',-I:;.•:::,..*'41,„h'..;:,,„,•.'„,-,..,,i4„,rh.:,.,„„f, ,',„.4.,',,,...,;,:::,, ,,',-,,, ,-;,::::,„..Qy„.;,',':'''.,"''''?;'-'f'r,':„;,,,,'„; 'f...7.4/11?:^431'.7'.' i":,'-65i;''''ti''',' '''*''''':; ;;C:'•ITII'4'''i''';i;". ' ;(:!illi:k;;;.i' ,I'''::- . ';'? ...,‘"0.,'. .•:„i '-i.'.:',..••1,.'ftt,/.1.i...'-:, ...C/t47. ••' '..'•:.il• ."' '''': ''','''',''''''' -'•*i'",'-:1....44'W''Z'''.1'.fti •:''t.''40.4%,''''.'.,0111.1,,V*:. .: .i.,.""e,'..-o.".'....'-,1*:; ''.:-..!.•..k,':',:•• ,'-;:„'>..-.'f, .'-'..•.:,..' -,.'.....;' '-','' -,-•. .• * •ri.*0•••4 i'''ili.. ' ,...11,..it'''.', ' ---... --'...,...;.•,.„.•,.i,...,4S'i I' • 0.1..'....;',...ii!,,,,,,,f,,,'`.;;:,"...-•.4..i'.,;)ri.,.;,,,,..,. ,',••.t ' 4.,,t,;',.,;;,..,,,,,,,,:„.2,,,,,,,,A,•:,,,,,,.,•:•• . . .• ,.. ,,,,...: . • ,,,,.., . .•:.,,,,:•,, ..,,••.., :•:,.•.••,.. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.-.,,,.,,,,,..,:.,:., ..•,:. ... ....i•i•i?•• . .i;,1:-:r...i,$:,,,$,.,,i$k $1, .•.0,..1.$. "V':',. •.0';',',„•-'.:','1'..:',•:•2,T,,-,11,r4t6i,t• •ob' ';:.:•.'„,5••:',';'il'•,;4"•;',''?•'•';`:ir'',Ijg•.1-'...1 i;\ ', i I 3, , * • , • •. .,•.*-,,`•''t,..,:itsr'54‘,..v..2e,,,4r,•-,..1,...---•`:-----• --'',-.:,•• „ :,, ' .,''-'.,-„',',, P,t„,:-:10:444Nti',.". V ' -I,-. S. ''''( ':-:'-'''."'-'-',Y,' '.--:,;-,.•-1,••.:.4...•.:.'--:.".' -,-, -,',.".-.-,-,-R!",:.,:-..,'-,,,'",:',''...„-s,':',,,..'•,'••y,'i4,,.P, • , ;44 i.''''',.'' '',2,V„,,,,;',"':',1';';‘,,:',2,•,-,,, ",; ,''''4''''''t.:Y;;,:.i:, ''''C: ''''''likk'J.:.;';''..,..,i 14i '4'‘,.'24:''',':,•;:'c,', i':,''':', •.:',:';','"i;',';';'f;i.i:V L..,'1'•,..„ •j:' '' ).7.''fI•i'.. .4#.+. 2:-.•;.,c,;;;0%.*:,, i,,,-.'a,,k",•: : ' .,i ..iaml:1,4;t,?,,tif ,......;...,...7,..?.I.,,-.., ,,:•. . , .,, •-,., .,,,....., ...,:....,,,,. „if.,..10,400.47.1..elotv.,,,74. .itti?,....f.i. ,, ,,,,,,,.. k,...,,, ,, C,,,,,,; '"',.,'',';','';.?2,'''.",';'4'.;.,',.,'''...':,.",,T.7• ,.. ; 'S.5'17 V''. it-4••k.,:.,. .A.tiA•-',.,"-:..,,,,;,'„,,•.,,,'''',' ,. . A $";%•1,,,,;•:/.!,*• i•'PYA:,'it,V.•,, •:::'.,','' '.'. • ,• , ' I• ,•„.,'•% 'i,'!,,,I,PS,4%?',P.P•clAri,;.' 44.4**,„ft,147t‘.''d' ,,,%,"4,,,,',',,',,, ,!",''• '•.„' ,4"'',',ny'rl,ii,t, , ,, . .,.. .,Sr 4',°.,t,,,,,, ti,‘ .„,,„.y.-..,,A,,Stlirkgr.4, 1:'„'s.,'''l''',''''',T:',,,. , ;'• ,'''',•. ,'",•',•+ ;,,.'"''''''.lt''''''.''''': ,•'... '''•,* % ' •• " - • '''' ' •.•:%'''': '.-1, -•17.".',- P '''''•'''''• % ,,•./4.'' % •%.'t•-. •:, ',',.. 1,7, . ' 4:4.1X'.,,,4% k":•at:ii :,•,-,•„•,),,,,,: 67.'-';,i',k,';''''''',;•';;'-'1','•:':'":"' ...."'::!:4Vf,. ...'',:7'. 1 ...::::. 7'"-,.,;v4.,,,:..4.‘!.:;;,-,..,, . • '-..„.:, — ' ; -.:-•.., , •• . h;:r.•,4'.'"' .., .,.; .. :• " . ' ,'..' --;l'ff, 0 4',.4 ,—.,1••.4.***,v.. ' '•,,,:";. tc,"1,'„ '"`„).4i,444f;',::.,''.' ,..''::•,.•''t'?',,,,:-'".,-."''.;±,,,*t•:,i... ..:1. 'e:,',:,,, '7.'''.....,41,,,•!!P'.41t.240".''.:..,'''''''''''',7'i,:.;.••.- • ..f. ...... ., .. , "*.,4-,-...•,,,,,'',. . ,.•4-4.,'-'..'":' -r,' " , div ..0 .-t:,,,,,,,:„.,. :i,----,,. .;-,',,,,,t,,,, .4.: ... .:...-f -r,...-• _. ,4.4t,,,,.../frtso,:,,.,„ ,:1'''1 - p"',4,, 4*i“:.4.' LIOC;;;-44' ,%.1.1%.' 4t4,,,;;...7".:1,4,'..''''' ;',...4.4' .:'.r'%, ,),,4,',C%' Op, '. .„:',.#'!,'7.11,V,:''''.7%:''': ..%'!."I'f4iM3C:,'4„,„'„i'3,,,%4%. ''''''''' - '-•• ,---',- ' .4'.Wittetittrl'-'---'-'."-•.-;, -',>.',',-".,;',%4%,.., '.',„. :,,,-.. r........•„,. . _, „4,'; 10111-07,0:!:44:, .•,:,,,1 .,',., ".•• r.4 , ..... iit.f *,,', *1.‘ '''''' ,,,-1-'3.',,T-,...!',''..7 ''...: 4,,,,,...'.....”,113.--....: '..-" ..:'",'.:4.-,,,,,'''•+IV'••1-0'.::,(•''‘'..,i ;.•.' . '•`"i'Y'''•-1,;.. '"`• i4i.•. ...--:4:•••• '• ••• •• ' •4- 1k,'.;""-"'"'" ,,,' ';•';',x",::01.,-":''"„i;~•.'.,:. k. •'••:t,:,,,',.:'.':.7 ,41te*,iiiii-4-0::0.4:--:'.;''.:"'7•111,;Wr':-., ',. ..., .''.'1, .',...*-1/2..'r ,',..•.. '•.-....':',....! '. - • •'.A'I't.:6't.il`'''''''..;"%•'V. . ,.. XC1 :'',•r*.•,•• .,,,,,,,------. , . -, - . ,-,.. :,'v.-,- ;•-•','`...p;"! ,1 • ,I, 1 '',-;,c-:.;;';;;,`:;`,_, _ - , '";.:.'"•':.•.-,!.:-',•,,:2...514-;.. .i't!';`)„.; :ifft,.,•-.-1,.:'„--;',,i''..fil''': r, ;1.'c4. ''-•'. •' '.;...-'''7f.'''''''' '•'''-'-• - ::•':•';''',!';;;14•7- ',..--:Wc,,,;- ,!,4 „.q--..;;',',,,,,,.,.'"`i.=';''.1"..'4aV.;,:6k4,;'Nh',..s:C:''.-,l'-a`ler+Z-1.4.>-,07s..-s%- ,'''.•','‘,.*,:-,.... " .., , -,i ---',"iik''''''„;'.',";,!,4',.4; '' —•••••'•• „ !..;'4'-'",,-:', i'-'''-'".J'"•,'"Ve'-'2;.,"---`;'- ',.';::',•%--..'v.0-',-,- i'-'-`-',Z0/:',,-,„-,:'-3;,•K',,a7'7",,,' ''1 ' .''',.'.-., :Pr': ••••••.'".,,,t•••4-!;',4i.•: ..'', , '1'.,;'$,'•";:jis;.,',:i.,';i:M''.." 1".1.t ."'''''' :. ' .P''.. ''1141 '"t' 1 ''''''' .• .1 ti,.. , ,:., ,. ,,, i'2..n.:,:.4it..5,,,,,J.0,,,• -,:t.,r),:g'4,',14,,::-i.::::., :,.--1,-:-.-,-;,:igi..q,%.:.-:.......•...--:-..y,,:."•-,,•r:••••;-;,.'0'..,-:•:•.:... :,1..z,: . :, , :".7,:::::, :{.."•,,,),r::::, ,,,,..F'•? '.." .,\ ,.• . ;, 1 ,:l , ,,1•4,„.,,:*;•, , • ;,,`,.•!/,';', ' ..,•..••:.... ....,:i..„, .:1, 4... ' Li';•:,,',...4';'4.'•,,•4'0,r,•,",4',...$)'•:,,'`.'.';.'1'•,•;,g•A'?•/6".',•1`,,';‘,•,4Pliki.'A''',i^.•''';r4.•'',•(4?, N'••••.',,•• .'„1,;.. ". .••'-'•..-1".'•i,.,.,,'•••.'••---.'.,•-•'..•••.'''••. •-•• - .'• •• • '1'"i':"'• ''••••'• - • • ''', '''' •i! ' ) 4• ' -''''•"k171-'....,.-'.''''''.• f.s.f:u :". ••,,r47,0 fSJ...eu...A • , ^ ,..,„ ••,, ':,i,......,,,,:,,,,,;-.1••.:,,, ,, -,..-,-4,-i41.`r''etrivti:,,PI., 1. !•:.' ..‘,..tN-'. -.' •, Alto ,.'''.':',,, .''4••''i'••'''' A r ,,,,,;,,,:,•. .,.•• .,..:,1,:,.,.:•..,•3..;,,,,,,,,,t,:.".,..,‘,0,„.••... .?•.t,.„ ,,,::„.4.,,,..1,,,,t.....•,,,f,,,,„ ...,..,,....... .....,,..... .., .,. . .. ,.,1,.,.,.! . . , , ., _. . ., •„..,„,...,,..,,,;.,„:„,„.„,„:„.,•,....,,„„:r:„0,4„..„4,.....1.,74,,,„,,,,„„,...,,,,,,o,.,„, ...„. ..........• ,, ...... .. • .• ..,..•i.... , . ,, ..,,.,.,:_,„.....,,,;,,„:„ ••,„„..• ,,. f.„,.....„.,....„4„...,, ,,,„....7,,,,,,,„,..„..,4„,c,„,,,,,„.„,,..„.:44,.,„,,,,,,, ,,,,,,, ... , •, ..„,..„......,....,, , . .• '.....,s-,:::,'•!.i..„.:.P.•:;.:;;;,';.p....;.„_:li,.,?rTff;:,cf'.. .!;t,:':.::'!,=,4;.f.,„,.p,7.:...,,..r:A-.:.-,i,t;...p,.,:-.:4:;:;,,,„„..i...,--.•:-!!,,o.:::-,,,,t•.',:,,:,,.e,,,,r,),,,.-,•..:,,,.,..:.,.-.;,,:„,,,..,-,:.;,,,,,,,.;::.,-'i'r:„,:;.'1„,,v5,,,:i,,,.,:r;;:!:.._o,,Q:::.,:s-,,:'ittr.;•;:.::;:,s7.,„.:-,ii.:-;,'i:,,,,,1;,,;:,:-,;:,:.,.,:.;;,],-,;•rf:,,:c;Artt-r,t,' ,,,,:,,,,,,,,,.•,,,m„,,.;;,,,,,,,,m4A„.,,,,,,,„...e.o..,,,,,4,,.„.17•,:„.„0.1,1,4.„‘„,,,,,,..,„4.„.'lleinireft.,:'„,4.,,,I1MrrtOlrirM* 1 , H,,•';',, •,,,,,,,,,,,i,‘,,,,f,t.y,,,‘,,i, ,.1. •-r. ..1,011,',4,..:...,;.,J,:k..„-;:',',,:,,, ,:,,,-;,,,,„,,.,,..?,,,.-46»,, .-'-,..,,r.. .-'!.,"'-'-,,,.-•4''e'--I.vp-''''.2.•7'5,';'`.•'1r'2,"-'7. 41•'.,',4!",',•"4',"'•'',""'''',4'' ,.?!.... 4.4'_.-.!!....--.-, S.,;;"'•'''-i''''`'''''';', it. .i. i . ,..4.,.. ...i,,,:,v,.'. . -...,..:::..::.......tii,.;,..,•44L ,iii-tio,AQ.,„„zt--- ,..,;;,: . . . . .‘ . :H H. --........:iii,.:• • • . . • PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: June 1, 2005 AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class Ill Site Plan for an addition to commercial premises. ITEM: III.E. . . >, L, q - ; a a a 1 N.W. 3RD ST. I I J Ill -11.11 ■ Cmi- GENERAL DATA: I D • Owner/Applicant Amjad Hammad lln MARTIN wTrx ! !1!U I • Agent Struc. Tech. Engineering, Inc. ' Location 139 NW 5th Avenue ' 1 Property Size 0.33 acres i Future Land Use Map General Commercial (GC) I I .Current Zoning Central Business District I I (CBD) I Ll •Adjacent Zoning North: Single Family Residential (R- N.W. 1ST ST. 1-A) I . I ! uuuuI East: Single Family Residential (R- a z z 1-A) IN _ ____ —_ ■ FIRE = 111111 C South: Community Facilities (CF) STATION E nun 6 West: General Commercial (GC) Illi < Existing Land Use Commercial I NO. I Proposed Land Use Commercial ATLANTIC AVENUE Water Service Existing (II j ll it l POLICE Sewer Service Existing I _ COMPLEX is ■,- m . 1E, a ■- - ,. is IIIl: a IN S.W.W, 1ST ST_ ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is that of approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness which incorporates the following aspects of a Class Ill Site Plan Modification for Hammad Shoppes Delray (139 NW 5th Avenue), pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(1)(c): ❑ Class Ill Site Plan Modification; ❑ Landscape Plan; ❑ Design Elements The subject property is located on the southeast corner of NW 5th Avenue and Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard (NW 2nd Street). BAC.KGR.OUN,D.�`: The subject property consists of Lot 2, Resubdivision of Block 27, is zoned Central Business District (CBD) and is within the West Settlers Historic District. The property contains a 3,413 square foot commercial building with six (6) back-out parking spaces on NW 5th Avenue and another four (4) back-out parking spaces on Martin Luther King Junior Boulevard (NW 2"d Street). The structure is a simple, unadorned concrete block rectangular building, constructed in 1951 and is considered non-contributing. On September 5, 2001, the HPB denied an application to allow signage installed on the building to remain. The signage had been installed prior to receiving a permit. The HPB denied the application as it felt the sign should have more character in keeping with the District. On December 1, 2004, an application for the review of a Conceptual Plan for alterations to the property was submitted to the HPB. The proposal included the construction of a 1,509 square foot addition at the rear of the existing commercial building, the construction of ten (10) back-out parking spaces on the adjoining alley, the construction of a refuse enclosure adjacent to Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard (NW 2nd Street), the elimination of the six (6) back-out parking spaces along NW 5th Avenue, and changes to the architectural elevations of the existing building. The development proposal also included the installation of a handicap accessible parallel parking space along Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard (NW 2nd Street) and four (4) standard parallel parking spaces along NW 5th Avenue. The parking spaces within the adjacent rights-of-way are associated with the NW 5th Avenue streetscape improvements. The HPB reviewed the proposal and their comments were forwarded to the applicant to amend the proposal. The Board's comments primarily consisted of relocating the 1,509 square foot addition from the rear of the property to the front in accordance with the adopted Downtown Delray Beach Master Plan and provide significant changes to the elevations so they are complimentary and harmonious with the area. The applicant is now before the Board for consideration of a Class Ill site plan for an addition and exterior alterations to the structure. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The development proposal involves the following: Meeting Date:June 1,2005 Agenda Item: III.E. Hammad Shoppes Delray(139 NW 5th Avenue) Class Ill Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan&Design Elements Page 2 o A 285 square foot addition to the rear of the structure, which involves closure of an existing roof area; o External alterations and improvements to the structure; o Removal of the six (6) back-out parking spaces in front of (west) of the building and installation of paver blocks; o Modifications to the four(4) back-out parking spaces on Martin Luther King Junior Boulevard (NW 2"d Street) to accommodate five (5) spaces, and the addition of ten (10) back-out parking spaces to the rear(east) of the property; o Installation of a dumpster enclosure and associated landscaping. It is noted that as part of the NW/SW 5th Avenue improvements, the Community Redevelopment Agency will be constructing the parallel parking space on Martin Luther King Junior Boulevard (NW 2"d Street), the alley along the east side of the property as well as the back-out parking spaces for this property and other properties with parking adjacent to the alley. SITE= PLAN MODIFICATION ANALYSIS COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. LDR Section 4.4.13(F)(3)(CBD Setbacks): The existing structure does not comply with the Central Business District setback requirements as they relate to the West Atlantic Neighborhood. Thus, the structure is non-conforming. The proposal is to enclose a 285 square foot roofed area, therefore, an analysis of the setbacks is not necessary. Parking The total area of the existing structure is 3,413 square feet and the addition will have an area of 285 square feet, giving a total area of 3,698 square feet. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.13(G)(2)(c), one parking space is required per 300 square feet of floor area for all non- residential uses, except restaurants, hotels, and motels therefore, 13 spaces are required. The proposed parking for the development comprises of five (5) back-out parking spaces (including one handicapped accessible space) on NW 2"d Street, and 10 back-out parking spaces on the alley to the rear (east) of the property, giving a total of 15 off-street parking spaces. There will also be four (4) on-street (public) parking spaces to the front of the property on NW 5th Avenue, and one (1) on-street parking space to the north of the property on NW 2"d Street. The Parking Site Data Table states there will be twenty (20) parking spaces provided including two (2) handicapped accessible spaces. The table should be amended to show there will be fifteen (15) off-street parking spaces, including one (1) handicapped space provided. It is noted that any change of use to accommodate a restaurant will require the processing of a Class III Site Plan Modification which addresses additional parking. Hammad Shoppes Delray(139 MN 5th Avenue) Class Ill Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan&Design Elements Page 3 Back-out Parking Martin Luther King Junior Boulevard (NW 2"d Street): Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(2), access which conforms with minimum aisle standards and which includes maneuvering area so that a vehicle must be able to enter and exit the parking area onto a street or alley in a forward manner shall be provided. While the four existing back- out spaces on Martin Luther King Junior Boulevard (NW 2"d Street) is an existing non- conforming situation and may be retained, with one being used as a handicapped space, a variance will be required to increase the number of spaces to five, thus the easternmost space must be eliminated. As provisionally discussed with the applicant, a variance will not be supported to provide any additional back-out spaces onto Martin Luther King Junior Boulevard (NW 2nd Street). Alley: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(2)(b), a minimum distance of 42' is required from the eastern edge of the alley to the front of the back-out parking spaces along the alley. The plan shows that a distance of only 40' is provided, therefore the parking spaces must be moved to the west by two feet (2') to comply with this section of the LDRs. If the parking is moved by two feet (2') to the west, access to the dumpster will be impaired as there will be no space for the gates to open. To avoid having to relocate the dumpster, the southernmost parking space to the rear (east) of the property should be eliminated to allow access to the dumpster in its currently proposed location. This would allow the balance of the spaces to be adjusted to provide additional stacking distance at the intersection of the alley and Martin Luther King Junior Boulevard (NW 2" Street). Removing one (1) parking space from NW 2"d Street and one (1) parking space from the rear (east) alley would leave a total of 13 off-street parking spaces for this development therefore this section of the LDRs would be complied with. The Delray Beach CRA in conjunction with the City of Delray Beach are currently working on the parking designs for the single space on NW 2"d Street, and the alley to the rear (east) of the property. The final design of the back-out parking can be approved administratively. Right-of-Way Dedication Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.1(D)(2), the City Engineer and DSMG (Design Services Management Group) have determined that the ultimate right-of-way width of NW/SW 5th Avenue is 50' and only 40' exists adjacent to the subject property. Thus the dedication of five feet (5') of right-of-way is required for NW 5th Avenue as part of this development proposal. Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.1(D)(2),.the required width of an alley is 20' or the existing dominant width, which is 16'. Further, pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.1(D)(3), additional right-of- way width may be required to promote public safety and welfare; to provide for storm water management; to provide adequate area for street trees; and to ensure adequate access, circulation and parking in high intensity use areas. As the subject property will provide back-out parking spaces off the alley and there will be increased utilization of the alley as redevelopment of the commercial properties occurs, the City Engineer and DSMG (Design Services Management Group) have determined that the width of the alley must be expanded to a width of 20'. As the properties to the east are single-family dwellings and extensive redevelopment of these properties is remote, an alley right-of-way dedication of four feet (4') from the subject property will be required. Hammad Shoppes Delray(139 NW 5th Avenue) Class Ill Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan&Design Elements Page 4 Site Lighting: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.8, site lighting must be provided. Wall mounted light fixtures have been indicated on the building; details of these fixtures have been provided. Pole mounted light fixtures may be necessary adjacent to the rear parking area. If pole mounted fixtures are to be provided, they must be decorative; wall packs should not be provided. A photometric plan is necessary. Site Plan Technical Items: The following technical items must be addressed prior to issuance of a building permit. 1) Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.3(B)(20), spot elevations showing changes of elevations of not more than two feet (2') existing and proposed, throughout the site and at a distance ten feet (10') into adjacent property should be shown. 2) Pursuant to LDR Section2.4.3(B)(20), spot elevations showing changes of elevations of not more than two feet (2') existing and proposed , throughout the site and at a distance ten feet (10') into adjacent property should be shown. 3) Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.3(D), preliminary engineering plans must be submitted for the new sidewalks and paver block areas that will be provided on the site. Any parking the applicant is proposing other than those provided by the CRA, must be indicated on the engineering plan. 4) A preliminary engineering plan must be submitted. 5) The Parking Site Data Table should be amended to show there will be fifteen (15) off-street parking spaces, including one (1) handicapped space, provided. 6) That four back-out parking spaces (including one handicapped space) are installed on NW 2nd Street. If a fifth space is required, a variance request must be submitted. 7) That a distance of 42' is provided required from the eastern edge of the alley to the front of the back-out parking spaces along the alley. 8) That the southernmost parking space to the rear (east) of the property is eliminated to allow access to the dumpster in its currently proposed location. 9) That current City of Delray Beach standard construction details are provided on the plans as applicable. 10) Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.17, two copies of a Pollution Prevention Plan must be submitted. Prior to and during construction of all sites, the permitee shall implement and maintain all erosion and sediment control measures included in the required Pollution Prevention Plan. 11) The five (5) foot right-of-way dedication for NW 5th Avenue must be shown on the plans 12) The two (2)foot right-of-way dedication for the alley must be shown on the plans. Hammad Shoppes Delray(139 NW 5th Avenue) Class Ill Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan&Design Elements Page 5 LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS The proposed new landscaping for the property includes Alexander Palms and Indian Hawthorn at the northwest corner of the site; Yellow Tabebuia and Indian Hawthorn at the northeast corner of the site; Red Tip Cocoplum Hedge to the south and west sides of the NW 2"d Street parking spaces, and Green Buttonwood, Red Tip Cocoplum Hedge, and St. Augustine `Floratam' sod to the east of the site adjacent to the alley parking. There will be Red Tip Cocoplum Hedging between the back-out parking at Martin Luther King Junior Boulevard (NW 2"d Street) and the walkway to the north of the building. The foundation planting to the west, north, and east sides of the structure comprises of Variegated Dwarf Schefflera and Evergreen Giant Liriope. Along the north and west sides of the building, vertical elements must be provided. This would accentuate the blank walls and the elevations. Also, the Tabebuia Trees should be changed to another tree species as these trees have a very weak root system and tend to fall over during high winds. Positive findings can be made with respect to LDR Section 4.6.16, providing the conditions of approval and technical items are addressed. Landscape comments were issued to the applicant; however, these have not been addressed and no revised landscape plan has been submitted. The following comments are therefore still outstanding and must be addressed prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1) The landscape plan shall be signed and sealed by a registered landscape architect. 2) The applicant shall provide complete landscape calculations using the standard form for commercial property. This can be obtained at the front desk of the Building Department. 3) The proposed Yellow Tabebuia tress shall be changed to another tree species as these trees have a very weak root system and tend to fall over during high winds. 4) Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.16(G)(1), all prohibited plant species shall be eradicated from the development site and the re-establishment of prohibited species shall not be permitted. This note must appear on the landscape plan. 5) Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.16H(H)(3)(b), the unpaved portion of the right-of-way adjacent to the property line shall be landscaped with sod and provided with irrigation and maintenance. 6) Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(g), the amount of interior landscaping within parking areas shall amount to no less than ten percent (10%) of the total areas used for parking and access ways. 7) The applicant shall provide vertical landscape elements along the north and west sides of the site. 8) Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.16(E)(1), xeriscape principles shall be utilized in landscape designs and installations. This would apply to the terminal islands of the parking row that is adjacent to the alley. 9) Item number four (4) under the planting notes shall be changed to reflect Delray Beach instead of Palm Beach County. Hammad Shoppes Delray(139 NW 5`11 Avenue) Class Ill Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan&Design Elements Page 6 10) Planting within the landscape areas on the north side of the site (adjacent to the property line) shall be tiered with the larger plant material on the inside and stepping down the height of plant material toward the street. 11) The applicant shall provide the location of all easements and utilities on the landscape plan to avoid conflicts between proposed planting and utilities. Provide the location of all street lights. 12) The paver area between the shop front and NW 5th Avenue is hard in appearance. Consideration should be given to adding further landscape features and/or planters to soften the appearance. D;�E.SIGN E.LEMEN,:TS LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(a-k), "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: The Board Shall Consider: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(8) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: (a) height, (b) front façade proportion, (c) proportion of openings (windows and doors), (d) rhythm of solids to voids: front facades, (e) rhythm of buildings on streets, (t) rhythm of entrance and/or porch projections, (g) consistency in relation to materials, texture, color, (h) roof shapes, (i) walls of continuity, (j) scale of a building, and(k) directional expression of a front elevation. Addition and External Alterations The applicant is proposing to build an 8" thick masonry block wall to the rear (east) of the structure to enclose additional space of 285 square feet. In conjunction with this addition the applicant proposes to improve all of the facades of the structure through alterations and the removal of the existing security bars. The front (west) façade will have three 1' 4" projections constructed around the three entrances with the projection to the northwest corner wrapping around the corner of the structure to NW 2nd Street. The projecting sections will also be raised in height to 2' 8" higher than the existing parapet. New store fronts will installed to each of the three units which will comprise of"Solar Green" glazing in "Bright White" frames. Four aluminum green louver awnings will be installed to the front façade, two over the central entrance and one each over the north and south entrances. The front façade will be symmetrical in appearance. Decorative elements include lighting fixtures at either side of each entrance, a 1%" simulated stone sill with a bull-nose edge (decorative foam) running around the building 4' from ground level, white foam cornices to the projecting entrance sections, and a white stucco band at the parapet. The main body of the structure will be painted a mustard color below the dado and a light tan color above the dado. The projecting entrance sections will have the pale tan color from ground level to the top of the doors (10') and the mustard color above the door level. A color rendering of the scheme has been submitted; however, paint chips have not been submitted. Hammad Shoppes Delray(139 NW 5th Avenue) Class Ill Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan&Design Elements Page 7 The north, east, and south facades are of similar design. A wooden trellis will be installed on the east and north elevations to add a feature to these facades. The proposed alterations to the existing building will significantly improve its overall appearance as it is currently run-down looking. The new design is clean and simple and will fit in well with the surrounding structures and it complies with the requirements of LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(8)(a)- (k). The proposed alterations incorporate the use of modem materials and, although the structure is in a historic district, this can be supported as the structure is a non-contributing building. The appearance of the building will be further improved by the removal of the security bars from the façade windows. While the overall proposal can be supported, the following comments must be addressed: 1) That paint chip samples of the proposed colors are submitted. 2) The location of the mechanical equipment associated with the development has not been depicted; however it is anticipated that the equipment will be located atop the existing/proposed building. There is a concern that the proposed parapet may not be of sufficient height to screen the mechanical equipment. A roof plan showing the location of the mechanical equipment and the method of screening must be submitted. 3) The paver area between the shop front and NW 5th Avenue is hard in appearance. Consideration should be given to adding further landscape features and/or planters to soften the appearance. It is suggested that landscaping is installed at the junction of the paver bricks and the sidewalk as the proposed streetscape improvements for this area include a multi-colored terrazzo sidewalk. The landscape element along the junction of the pavers and the terrazzo would disguise any possible clash in colors. Another alternative would be to change the paver blocks to colored concrete or another material that would complement the terrazzo sidewalks. REQUIRED FINDINGS Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(1)(c)(Class III Site Plan Modification), a Class III site plan modification is a modification to a site plan which represents either a change in intensity of use, or which affects the spatial relationship among improvements on the land, requires partial review of Performance Standards found in LDR Sections 3.1.1 and 3.2.3, as well as required findings of LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(5). Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(5) (Findings), with a Class III site plan modification formal findings under Section 3.1.1 are not required. However, a finding that the proposed changes do not significantly affect the originally approved plan must be made concurrent with approval of a Class III modification. The development proposal involves a 285 square foot addition to an existing 3,413 square foot commercial property, exterior alterations, car parking improvements, and associated landscaping. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(G)(5), this minor modification does not significantly impact the findings as they relate to consistency with the Future Land Use Map, Concurrency or the Comprehensive Plan. Compliance with the Land Development Regulations was discussed earlier in this report. The development proposal has a minor impact on Concurrency items as discussed below. Hammad Shoppes Delray(139 NW 5th Avenue) Class Ill Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan&Design Elements Page 8 Traffic The subject property is located within the City's TCEA (Transportation Concurrency Exception Area) designation area, which encompasses the CBD, CBD-RC, OSSHAD, and West Atlantic Avenue Business Corridor. The TCEA exempts the above-described areas from complying with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. Therefore, a traffic study is not required for concurrency purposes, however a traffic statement is necessary to keep a record of trips approved in the TCEA and for calculation of traffic impact fees. A traffic statement has not been submitted therefore this has been added as a condition of approval. Solid Waste Requirements The proposed 285 sq. ft. addition will generate an added 1.45 tons of solid waste per year[(285 sq.ft. x 10.2Ibs./sq.ft./year = 3,021 lbs/2,000 lb. = 1.45 tons)]. The Solid Waste Authority indicates in its annual report that the established level of service standards for solid waste will be met for all developments until 2021. REV21_EW B'Y .OTHERS . ` Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) At its meeting of April 14, 2005, the CRA Board reviewed and recommended approval of the site plan modification as proposed. West Atlantic Redevelopment Coalition (WARC) At its meeting of April 13, 2005, the WARC Board reviewed and recommended approval of the site plan modification as proposed. ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION The development proposal involves a 285 square foot addition to a commercial building, exterior improvements to the building, car parking improvements, and associated landscaping. The improvements to the property are appropriate for the West Settlers Historic District and will improve a currently run-down building which is situated on a prominent location. The proposal will be consistent with LDR Sections 3.1.1, 2.4.5(G)(5), 4.4.13, 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(a-k), and 4.6.16, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan when the conditions of approval are addressed. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the COA and associated Class III site plan modification, landscape plan and design elements for Hammad Shoppes Delray (139 NW 5th Avenue), by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(a-k) of the Land Development Regulations and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines subject to conditions. C. Deny approval of the COA request and associated Class III site plan modification, landscape plan and design elements for Hammad Shoppes Delray (139 NW 5th Avenue), based upon a finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Hammad Shoppes Delray(139 NW 5`h Avenue) Class Ill Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan&Design Elements Page 9 does not meet criteria set forth in Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(a-k) of the LDR's and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. STAFF RECOMMENDATION By Separate Motions: Site Plan Modification Move approval of the COA request and associated Class Ill site plan modification for Hammad Shoppes Delray (139 NW 5th Avenue), by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 3.1.1 and 2.4.5(G)(5) of the Land Development Regulations and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, subject to the following conditions: 1) That revised plans are submitted (3 sets) addressing all Site Plan Technical Items and conditions of approval. 2) That paint chip samples of the proposed colors are submitted. 3) That the elevations are revised and a roof plan provided which show the location of the roof mounted equipment and the method of screening. 4) That additional landscape features and/or planters are provided within the paver area west of the building to soften the appearance. 5) That landscaping is installed at the junction of the paver bricks and the sidewalk to disguise any possible clash in color between the pavers and the terrazzo. Or to change the paver blocks to colored concrete or another material that would complement the terrazzo sidewalks. Landscape Plan Move approval of the COA request and associated Landscape Plan for Hammad Shoppes Delray (139 NW 5th Avenue), by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request and approval thereof is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 4.6.16 of the Land Development Regulations, subject to the following conditions: 1) That revised plans are submitted (3 sets) addressing all Landscape Plan Technical Items and conditions of approval. Design Elements Move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness and the associated design elements for Hammad Shoppes Delray (139 NW 5th Avenue), by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, and the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, subject to the following conditions: Hammad Shoppes Delray(139 NW 5th Avenue) Class Ill Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan&Design Elements Page 10 1) That a five foot (5') right-of-way dedication is made for SE 1st Avenue and the right-of- way deed is accepted by the City Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. 2) That a four foot (4') right-of-way dedication is made for the alley to the rear (east) of the property and the right-of-way deed is accepted by the City Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) That the proposed additional (easternmost) back-out parking space onto Martin Luther King Junior Boulevard (NW 2" Street) is eliminated from the proposal. 4) That a minimum distance of 42' is provided from the eastern edge of the rear alley to the front of the back-out parking spaces along the alley. 5) That details of all proposed and required site lighting are submitted. 6) That a photometric plan is submitted. Attachments: Survey, Site Plan, Floor Plan, Elevations Report prepared by: Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner • J L rib � I IIItrc•iecA eN Ne n ' ''° Land Planner. Sruc.Tec inee rin A P RIL 26 20 0 0tmu Maus Im"nehm¢omoem PWI t : yy�50 SITE PLAN APPROVAL hi, (95°)7l-07504°Fox(954)7e5-0976 HAMMAD SHOPPES DELRAY QELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA INDEX OF DRAWINGS SITE PLAN & SURVEY 1 OP 1 SURELY 8P-1 817E PLAN a m+ w� .uw.ut LANDSCAPE LA•1 LANDSCAPE PLAN ARCHITECTURAL A,� A1 L PLAN VW*F127.3 N1144 A2 E.1 ELEVAEVA TION17111'' AZ•II ELEVATIONS 1A4 7 R i lin on.o ''''.... .rim 14 HL, 1w 0012 F ',. . w, 7. 7 ' 1E0 no..�L'3 LI 98-1 • • . .. ... \ R / . ... ..'-1•••••.... ..--$.1$ oo. Apply TOM. ,rly We REDIDEMI,/CCRIERCIAl. COTOORJOTION.Exi.STOG,1 Ham rTeOTECIIMNEN•WRWLEO Fg...S•O=Xi.....•=7.4..... ' . • 1 Wilic;)/5.4..,,,....i, PARKINS SITE DATA.I I A TOT,um...RECUIREO O TOTAL PARC.I.rpftmoro INCL$0,40 I HO. JO \ /. Vac...Avow Hi II I ,i SITE DATA . . .. . . seasiesignieffsmaistaggi MAN I - GULP,.AREA 01....) ORM AREA.lrerRNO.010.1•4$ $11,SAPD 3)0•14 . • ' .P11M.P1INIPTIgETIMIIPLIMINI EMffl.IWIffIltift111,0J,ERT4-„Retie., PARINO fiTALL OT.OSVOLO ,rAyTD Ye,NCH memo"Mile,' .4.524O, TOTAL LOT AMA 1•100.1 11.>I9111 OTANOtg,Iv IN, OIL CO,Acm$am.R.ftowft TYPICAL PARKING SPACES DETAIL RT 4.2,—. .. .11 TYPICAL CONCRETE PAVER SECTION 4.— t 1...A $ Ar re...1....„. larcA". •••,,,Er."1..' •, . . . '11; " ii.. „ . . . . .. 11111111111111111111 I?ill I! i $i 19- -Ft- air-0.z ipoiz......1 a iill ... 11 i 11 237.--.1"4—.1111 M. :,:`,...re"`" :-...7"• .44,-"!:..r.t.... \ / : t ____rt.____ ____q._____— .0=7.Z.I.IN% TYPICAL DuriPeTER FRONT ELEYATICV uncommfto tremor:7 t N.W.2nd STREET 1 . rrr..... .-. ' • Itf.t. , -, Tv VINJOR.060$01,te.tor ""tr ":: ,40.)14,1 . .,1,3,t!*!:60.,,,i I a w g : I MO' ,liel--: ... ,__. . -,$A,I.k: /-1`P----.'.:.,...-....';,..t;:.,,,L..•,...-:,..,,,,.iL,,g..,; 1,-.(,-.,.., ,, ; M< 'i 1 .... 1 • ,. b Z - ...,,.:.„ ,.,.,•,,,.1•••••••,- . -.,-- 'St" I *. ,..,....:.... tA I— ..._ 11.111$17.11.1. 1 ll .........„........,0 (4, . . :.„,-....,,,H-.,..v_. ., ;:,:t, .......U....3'.. t! 11 11.1 I . MP ONIA•••••••=a own,. ...=.,..,'." I A"L"'.f."'.1•:,n T a.'"r...4 r Mr • --... • > '1'..,...'2.....',.!,,,.li ,.,,r, -• gla k• ,.,—,-. .',:.,.,!...,- .:,: ;1; l'....c_?_c , „;I:. '..•si . E i'......,y.,:i. .....-A 'EF21 +1 7....' °1 -• m g,.....,,.!..,..,.:. —• .-:'..•i'' ''.t. , s!!'.•.•:,!1!.;!;.-!!Ysit 0 , .,.. —.1111 , tn al 1 0 g i v.. < . . ! 1 .. i . . , . ti •.. . . ..L..... O.. I ItEM b • RYON MOO HANDICAPPED SIGN DETAILS1. „ • _..1.. =mil .1. .,. I) I':::;:, .:: i..''..•:'..- . I.; MINIM 01.0•11ROONCRITE.R.IND . am*form•••••3.$1,,o.• / N. '$ PAMIR COCIMIT•POMO.r ..4=aftzrz.Lftftft ' \ ft..* 1•••••MO CAN MO*. Illti • ...„.„, SITE PLAN NCRTI.1 1111.111.0.14.!•114 t le 1%... raZnall4747.1r. 'FEE •••• - el, ..... • .•. AR$0.11•51••••tow, diiiF CA- • SCALE.1".20.0" 1 ' MN,ONTO 01%A*1.0.1110 „...I II Va.ill i EZ3 INDICATES CONCRETE PAYERS 'ED INDICATES CONCRETE / \ / I DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE k"TYPE"D.CURE MT.% WAIL VP.$4.• R.I.brIOL wal.AS NOW ....././. MI...Mt oie-1 1. ...ow*MOM / \ 1 -.-':...-.• \ / 1•••••• SP-1 • , .,, .... . . / \ . — \ / • me. ea MI corn. e 4 Deer.w pca . \ / �.1 O ✓JtivMIM 411MtLL1,w1 WIN L,NE �.Y. ae.ro 411ro ru®7=44nlwrwe va T. 6 { Q lom ..cr was Am,1uTa?pIV. .a.n w.11s Q 6y 'E''e uJrz ,vu -ee.ro wiro . 1. wog O J`aJR en.Y u a ,v er. °� 33 . .. RETOM ETC(TTIG DOOR AA°0.06E /Jo- e T ExlaiwG WUL DFv+sG .$ e uxa 4w Put DETxJ.cnnnova. " 4••• ecutooa pent nnAnioaDwFr• T nu�t,m a�i D®e n.4nai res.,.rlemxe• rAw.cruv 1 M4i ententerzau�iau NEW 6•IlMAUGAr oloa WALL , 6 Fmn,e.A ,ro6,•N.1.NT .. 1 r n Peoaree..,OR.rorxura • "ii 9 1 1a4 A 7 ILEr:7� r JEXIETRG WALL TO Ras*. 9 7 \'" MacemerAYIS :-411"'L.'I,. .J (3 0'1 m v o -4 EA161E0 WALL 10 RERAN " • .' O I R I� I-i n t u ,p'�,{' , a Ali 1111 at`45'47_ k 0 I U F +..•. ER DOTING TO RAN etm t m Q F OA 1 NOUR RATED PARTITION �.�v. PJ14g INR FR WALL. W1U2E 1LF FA WALL. 'At p S'-17 GA niL SND9.74'OG WIIL61'ER e'-71 G4 nR 9NDS e14.OLW/I LdI'ER y.�m�my Et'MPH 6J GXPOJ100N67 EA SIDE, 940 TiT9'1.G14d7't E3N®E4 610E 4.1 ....'��.,.�^.,r.�.:' I 1 I I iR:il EPEE 5150I 2010150 r01NDE�iOe F1'tl],DOT.FLOOR TEE TO WDER61DE • .TS�,�.Z:1.:Y7• he,is�l,il CP EkI6iPG Da9lE TEE fTTPICKA Cl EXOTRG DO.HLE TEE frTPICOLA ...J.�.... 0— 0— / \ \ / —r r II i O DE: LqT MN NEW—_r.... t_ — J� L`_:_ _Jr .e „ntYl-1 l 7 rk-i i • NEW 0'1.14. Sf ff IIIII j Mil. NU N e•tt4246GRt BLOC<WALL -1 II FLOOR FLAN PO`" SCALE,I/4".I'-0' • \ / I \ v \ / elw•.• r-.• n•r• �i °t 1�t;€1 ' I N. 1 bECORATVE FOAM \__ /. `rr•- _.. _..__.. . _._..._ .._...._. _..._..._.._.....___...._........_.._._..._.._...._.._...... a 6/•1• .CC re- 1.1t /SM Wye" R , Q fL_IMO 0 SOUTH ELEVATION 6CALE•I/4".I'-0" 0 2 i 4` x co I T'•I' ems• a•e• p DCCORAiIvE O M ALIMMM L�ONER&NAG FACED P WILD r0 BE GED i sn t O 111Y.00 DA.C) `r 2 I- FACFQWILDRGOPACEDAiB.OG i ti J \ \ J LKAR MANE(I-Mt—Nil I �1 7l1 d y itJ \ \ l�OECORAII E FOAM I J .▪r a NM .r.Mw W YFm 0•ewuEnSTONE awww J \ BILL BLLL ROSE EDGE METAL DOOR(M'1. —STORE FROM FROM AID DOORS \COLORbMfIT WM'FRAMES. - . ROLAR GREEN 4LAz.G .... NORTH ELEVATION A2-1 SCALE.I/4"•I'-0" M/ . / \ • LOCO TRELLIS TO 0E WALLED CH • FACE Q 0UED94 WPACIIO AT W OG. • n'.'• n� 59-1 STLOCO Savo enrco BAND 1 • 1 1T• 9 6 ""r • S*y:r 4 • r i• L ULM FIXTURE(TTIO ,..---LIGHTFECIl@ffl1'A • ' DECORA1hE ROAM II.II }• t t :11 • .._....._ _..._. err ` / . ✓ / 9 waw,. . \—nE1AL DO (TTP,, ash Ns o CK EAST ELEVATION 0 v a Q v.p. W oEcaurK FDA/1 1 ALTMAN La u AWING. nvEFOM DECORATK FOAM C • .. • 0. STOCO 040 I eA BANG t J. 1 h . • LGur Fi%1:4(rTP,, Ir ECCRATIK FO41 ✓ �� '�. \fw. w u / — '� Y Y WO —._. . . .. ,— L i —I a E-r-•• r Y/IMa IL-.'a L RC RR. LN RW.9 STORE FRONT GAOCO MO DOOR!— —'TOTE FRLNT 4ADGVA,N0 DOOR! STORE!MKT 1.04002 MO DOORS ••R eN MM. . COLOR roRXi+ruare•FR:xex caLGR•eTEwr EWE'FRMzaCOLOR FRAM. •90.AR G RE1CLAlt GREEN'REEN•[LAIEG •50LAR GREW GLAESG ` ✓ 4441 WEST ELEVATION I-1-2 SCALE,1/4"•1'-0" nI • • DEFRAY BEACM UEu re—Ti HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD �' lilt MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT liji 1993 1993 2001 " " 2001 Agent: Jeffrey Silberstein, Architect&Associates, Inc. Project Name: House of Vintage Project Location: 123 South Swinton Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD :. The item before the Board is consideration of the revised Design Elements for House of Vintage (123 South Swinton Avenue), pursuant to Land Development Regulations Section 2.4.6(H). BACKGROUND l PROJECT DESCRIPTION At its meeting of April 20, 2005, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) reviewed a Class IV Site Plan Modification for a 3-story residential addition to the rear of the extant historic structure. The development proposal includes the following: ■ Construction of a 1,882 sq. ft. 3-story residential addition to the rear of the building and demolition of the existing single-loaded four(4) space parking lot; ■ Construction of a four (4) space back-out parking lot on to the alley including one handicapped accessible space; and, ■ Installation of associated landscaping and relocation of the trash receptacles to the south side of the building. The Staff Report raised a number of concerns regarding the proposal and recommended that, if approved, the approval would be subject to the following conditions: 1) That the third floor area is limited to 50% of the second floor area. 2) That the third floor setbacks or planes of the façade are offset and varied to provide visual relief. 3) That a photometric plan is submitted which complies with the illumination standards of Section 4.6.8 of the LDRs. It is noted the light fixtures must be decorative. 4) That the parking space and alley have a combined minimum depth of 42'. 5) That all plans are consistent with each other. 6) That the plans indicate the improvements within the alley which include the paved alley and the 2'valley gutter Meeting Date:June 1,2005 Agenda Item: III. F. House of Vintage(123 South Swinton Avenue)—Design Elements Page 2 7) That revised plans are submitted addressing the Site and Engineering Plan Technical Items as indicated in the staff report, and the listed conditions. 8) That window and door specifications are submitted. 9) The proposed use of the loft area is clarified on the drawings. 10) That the applicant ensures that the palm to be planted adjacent to the east building elevation will not be in conflict with the overhang of the building. 11) That the designs of the building elevations are altered to provide visual compatibility with the historic buildings within the historic district. The applicant advised he was in agreement with the first ten (10) conditions listed in the Staff Report; however, he believed that the design of the building was appropriate for the Old School Square Historic Arts District. With regard to condition 11, and after discussion, the HPB postponed the development proposal with the following direction provided to the applicant: 1. Reduce the scale. 2. Offset the north elevation. 3. Change the profile of the roof. 4. Doors and windows should be vertical. The applicant has submitted architectural elevations for the development that have been revised to address staff conditions 1, 8, and 10. With regard to staff condition number 11 and the HPB's comments, the applicant has stated: "The elevations have been altered. The footprint has remained the same for the first and second floor. The third floor footprint is the same but has been flipped to the south side. The building height has been reduced by 2'-4". By flipping the third floor this softened the "walled" effect on the north side. On the south side the addition is separated from the house by 10'of landscaping. On the south side the planes of the facades are offset and varied providing visual relief. We did look at hip or shed roof configuration but this only drew more attention to the design. The intent is to make the addition "disappear" from the west elevation view'. These items are now before the Board for review. Additional background and complete analysis of the proposal is found in the attached Historic Preservation Board staff report of April 20, 2005. DESIGN ELEMENTS ANALYSIS LDR Section 2.4.6(H)—Certificate of Appropriateness: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H)(5), the Board must make a finding that any Certificate of Appropriateness which is to be approved is consistent with Historic Preservation purposes pursuant to Objective A-4 of the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and specifically with the provisions of LDR Section 4.5.1. House of Vintage(123 South Swinton Avenue)—Design Elements Page 3 Future Land Use Element Objective A-4: The redevelopment of land and buildings shall provide for the preservation of historic resources. The objective shall be met through continued adherence to the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance and the following policies: Future Land Use Element Policy A-4.1: Prior to approval or recommending approval of any land use or development application for property located within a historic district or designated as a historic site, the Historic Preservation Board must make a finding that the requested action is consistent with the provisions of Section 4.5.1 of the Land Development Regulations relating to historic sites and districts and the "Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines". LDR Section 4.5.1(E)-Design Elements Pursuant to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(a), (c), (g), (h), and (j), "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating alterations or additions of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: (4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (8) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: (a) Height: The height of proposed buildings or modifications shall be visually compatible in comparison or relation to the height of existing structures and buildings. (c)Proportion of Openings (Windows and Doors): The openings of any buildings within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the openings exemplified by the prevailing historic architectural styles within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors among buildings within the district shall be visually compatible. (g) Relationship of Materials, Texture, and Color: The relationship of materials, texture, and color of the façade of a building shall be visually compatible with the predominant materials used in the historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. (h) Roof Shapes: The roof shape of a building or structure shall be visually compatible with the roof shape of a historic site, building or structure within a historic district. (j) Scale of a Building: The size of a building, the building mass in relation to open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, and porches shall be visually compatible with the building size and building mass of historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation states that: New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. House of Vintage(123 South Swinton Avenue)—Design Elements Page 4 • New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. Design Guidelines Locate an addition as inconspicuously as possible, usually to the rear or least public side of a building. In a historic district, consider the surrounding buildings and the compatibility of the addition in terms of size, scale, materials, mass and roof form. Do not introduce a new architectural style, or too closely mimic the style of the existing building. Additions should be simply and cleanly designed and NOT attempt to replicate the original design. Insure that the addition is secondary and subordinate to the main mass of the historic building. Additions that overwhelm the original building are not an acceptable solution. Reduction of scale The addition has been reduced in height by 2'-4" and the third floor has been flipped to the south of the proposed addition which has helped to break up the "walled" effect on the north elevation; however, the height and mass of the addition still dominate the extant historic structure. The greater height of the proposed addition behind the one story structure is due to the inclusion of a third floor. This is in conflict with LDR Section 4.5.1(8)(a) which states that The height of proposed buildings or modifications shall be visually compatible in comparison or relation to the height of existing structures and buildings'. It is accepted that the applicant wishes to maximize the internal floor area of the addition; however, the required space should be accommodated over two floors. A two-story addition would be approximately 3.75' higher than the ridge of the extant historic structure and it is unlikely that it would be visible from South Swinton Avenue. Repositioning the third floor has helped to reduce the mass of the addition on the north side; however the mass has now been transferred to the south side. Further, the west fagade of the addition has no windows or decorative features which contributes to this mass. Reducing the addition to two floors would address this concern. Offset the north elevation Repositioning the third floor has softened the "walling" effect of the north façade; however, the third floor still dominates the extant historic structure. Again, the removal of the third floor would address this concern. Change the profile of the roof This issue has not been addressed. The height of the roof has been lowered by 2'-4"; however, its profile is unchanged. House of Vintage(123 South Swinton Avenue)—Design Elements • Page 5 Doors and windows should be vertical The design of the proposed addition still includes the two windows on the north elevation that have a horizontal emphasis as opposed to a vertical emphasis, therefore this issue has not been addressed. Conclusion Based on the above, the issues raised by the HPB with regard to staff condition 11 have not been addressed. The proposed addition does not conform with the requirements of LDR Sections 4.5.1(8)(a), (c), (h) and (j), the Design Guidelines or the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. The proposed addition cannot therefore be supported as: • The proposed addition dominates the extant historic structure (mainly because of the proposed height and the lack of features on its west elevation). • A new style of architecture is being introduced to the existing building, which, according to the Design Guidelines, should not be done. • The revisions fail to address the direction provided by the HPB, which included changing the profile of the roof to be consistent with the extant dwelling, and that vertical doors and windows are provided. If the client wishes a contemporary addition with a flat roof, this may be achieved by removing the third floor as the addition would be not be visible from the main public right-of-way (South Swinton Avenue). It should be noted that many of the above conditions and issues could be addressed by simply removing the proposed third floor of the addition. This would achieve the required reduction in scale, would remove the need for offsets on the north elevation, and would allow the installation of a flat roof. Also, although the Design Guidelines state that a new architectural style should not be introduced, it would be easier to support a contemporary addition it was not visible from the public right-of-way. Based on the above, therefore, the proposed addition fails to comply with the majority of the design requirements set out in the LDRs, the Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and is therefore not consistent with Section 3.1.1 and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. As further amendments are required, the item should be postponed with direction. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness and the associated waiver, Class IV site modification plan, landscape plan and design elements for 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage), by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: House of Vintage(123 South Swinton Avenue)—Design Elements Page 6 1) That the third floor setbacks or planes of the façade are offset and varied to provide visual relief. 2) That a photometric plan is submitted which complies with the illumination standards of Section 4.6.8 of the LDRs. It is noted the light fixtures must be decorative. 3) That the parking space and alley have a combined minimum depth of 42'. 4) That all plans are consistent with each other. 5) That the plans indicate the improvements within the alley which include the paved alley and the 2'valley gutter 6) That revised plans are submitted addressing the Site and Engineering Plan Technical Items as indicated in the staff report (dated April 20, 2005), and the listed conditions. 7) The proposed use of the loft area is clarified on the drawings. 8) That the designs of the building elevations are altered to provide visual compatibility with the historic buildings within the historic district. 9) That the following issues raised by the HPB at their meeting of April 20, 2005, are addressed: 1) That the scale of the addition is reduced. 2) That offsets are included in the elevations. 3) That the profile of the roof is changed. 4) That the doors and windows have a vertical emphasis. C. Move denial of the Certificate of Appropriateness and the associated Class IV site plan, landscape plan and design elements for 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage), by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Postpone with direction. Attachments: Location Map,Photograph,Floor Plan,Elevations,Staff Report of April 20,2005 Staff Report prepared by:Warren Adams,Historic Preservation Planner ) ..._i . 1• i , ! , . i I WAL- LAKE IDA ROAD J GREENS • M N.E. qT}1 = ` ‘�c y.aM sr. $T. ! POST— i' CASON IOFFICE u - - METHODIST —./..: }CHURCH �_ 3 x _ -i-i-mt — _ J—_ - 11— .5'f �'-' a a— wa aa — o — w I '• N.W. 3RD ST. N.E. 3RD ST.I ! .E 3RD ST-r ' 2CITY i • ~ATTORNEY in r. I _ o BUILDING ; , wI. 1 ! 1 . v . ! i h III I Z N,W. 2ND ST. 1 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DRIVE N.E. 2ND ST. Arm • 0 MIMI--,...; W 3 Iii IIIIp11/ N.W.. 1ST ST. N.W. 1ST Sr. N.E. 1ST ST. I v 3 - 3 COMMUNITY W 1.; a _ z z - i CENTER z �z Z - FIRE rSTATION � - _ TENNIS i----1 OLD OM vi CHOOL ! i STADIUM SQUAARE ; I I W :NO. 1 . 1 f I z �� ATLANTIC $ AVENUE/ I 1 1'1 POLICE SOUTH I Z ' ! I I ! I ! I l COMPLEX ' COUNTY l J r 111 COURT 0 111 HOUSE t- al > ¢ Z I■ > a U i.i a _ I Q N ! ! ! I S.W. 1ST ST. S.W. 1ST ST. S.E. 1ST ST. o N i z n BUGS I- lA to a 3 h W tri vi iN i MI-Ell S.W. 2ND ST. S.E. ' 2ND ST. I� I nn FTU7-I I[-1 IFri Ill 1- F (-111 (^ i N _ - OLD SCHOOL SQUARE HISTORIC ARTS DISTRICT CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL -OSSHAD- PLANNING do ZONING DEPARTMENT -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- DRAWN BY: NPT • • . . ..... .., ..,.. . . . . - ,..-- -,Lls.-:-,-. -----H-- -----,-:-...----.1--.?:;_,:---,-,...' .', ---.:.:.7`"444141%,,,i......_.-_ ,. qt--. ?:-.__.,_,. . '/,t,i,-::}:, ‘3,(4-.,,,.-- -• '' -• ', 1-_,-,'-.0.1-:4:,:Tr- -..- -.-::-.?"--'4,'-'9_.':?'r•--:•::-,--, -, ‘,:'-• -t--X;••-•,--,- -. -----7:',.:'..f:-•..L-1-"-.; s:,.1.,-,;,:;=.,;=', -i--7_ --1_,.';':!-- i : ".',,;=fA---1-1,4"1.-?'7:-:-•' -,---- :--- ,,-=':.-S,;i:-,;,:ltl•- . 1,4:-'4R.,1,-14;-;k4i,a,,_-•-4,.-„-,-----—_' ,Iksa,4.:,,7-•-•' -,::::,•i,:it,r,y4;,5--:-44;•: ,•,,,.:_,i•74-_-:,.4.-;, .i,..-,::1--_- ce,"_______---7: ' , "...•1%;.":,',,,-..,'''P_7: •-_--'. '<7' ::''...1",:ff,q.'..,',,,-4141-4;'''' :- --- - --.•- '- - 1441,m-A.14-1:f'.7.4----i--._!..-,-_-.,;:,-._.• ---._ -.:•.--p . 0..----'1 .1. .-.=-.--'---_-, ..---._,,,....-4----_,---,‘,,••-- --------- %-4.,.--,----- cawrif--!;-•71N---:•__--,:=.,,,t-„,--,_.-,.-:---_-:-.1.-41-1 iivly-1_-_-• -.:114..fil ?,-_-.;:-:. --, ._--.t' ;v----,:---'-.1,T4-1-1•?';'-:. ':-Ii.C.-i- ---;,--.•--:-.3,---:':- ''' - ;,„.--_-,--7------ . .:*ft--14. • - --....--4V0-...- 4 i , --,- ilst 71•:':TO,S;4°' ... ..- v•-,-.:6„:‘,--•*,7,•=v,-:,-7- : :„ ..„--,1-,, ,__•,-,_s ---,,,,:„._.•• .._ . .,::-.....•!;---4.---....--7,=-4--- -- - • •,,,• ,• _,„—li---A!"-,,,,--••_4--i , -,, •!-,:-•,,,,„,,,,,-.,--,,_,,,, _44:::„--•„-,,,._.••,„, _.. - -; #.• .,:( "':if Lit, ,..4-1,4-;',A,..jr:„.,171";:;-4,.?4, 2.4,""r„,-;,,,:.._.„_-...,,,:„' 1i„Iti :-._.-.......- ', , ....„ '.j: '`-' Pill :i:;:,4B: -76 --1. - IN r.."_iiti It 1:14,i,,..,7. 7.,..:"'-'-',0 0.7.,,,ki-1.;i_f_' e..,,,,_z=?::: ,_'ak--'''.:'-4,-_-*-'7'4:7.1..,; 1,„*.i•--;; ! , ---- n . ‘A'' '4,-'4-7,,ttz,:'-a,.U7_' 1.,--e. • ,k4t-i44-4T: ''''''''''' - --'11- 4 ., °- •. ,1,- I 11 .i •1;.„--":,.4$41.,,.. :.. ;.,.:--- i ;, :- •1.-,,,,,r .1.t.:447-..- - •,'M.-',!---,i;j, „.... -.,..t::`.-,.-f- ' 7 . 4': . ,'-'--!in , • - -- 1 ! - ,...-.,-- • .-!-_,--,9-- ,r-",----`.,..----.-.P: -.4' ---,-.•-,1,. ., . i I * ''',',..t..'7'•.g . ' - '1-,.,:k'14 7,=1. -;:, ,': ' ''' ' :;-.-1-1_'.-iT,---11, 1.21g : -; - .,i- ---•-.}-41.;: ,,,1 '!-,),.... : _.--;=.----,_-_-z:---;.-,.--:-- - .:,--..-;':.•".-- 1.'•. - L:'_-.:-.,...--7--,J-;;•7,'-i • '''''.--: Ir.. 'F- ',.- !, .. ..r.V 'k--77--. .jl,t_1.-:.‘;',17':.:::-.:-.:1.';;-":-.--:1----, :-.;".:'::. :..•,7-7r;-1:;:-71'.-J! !--.--•,'- ' .;:.;,-_'. -,_---!::-.: '' - ':.: .,-. '..-:;. ..-;'- ''',; ;-': r -._ ,',-,.,.7g- --__:_:.-t-;.-,-;,--•;':,---Ii--.=,!;--„,---.7.-:----.'7".7,L_I . , :..;.:•:---il.';-.'--,!,:.1:- --:.,,,.:,:r . :......-1'. :: -;: •!.-: :, :.1 . •J•.,14,.; "„-----14-- ;',-- •,--•:'.,"---•-•,-;,.. 7,-,7,-- --,-,--,---. , ,„„ • '._j;="••• "..--`2::-_.__,•• -•;.. -s:''_-_- :-_-4--,•_,.--. ";,!,.1'."_-:, ;:',.-_-_", ••_:_. r.' = .:'-.„_•--. 1 1 iii : " - m-!-___•1" -il . - -:,• ;',•-t;t7.!.;";: i•77-':-;:7-,:-.---N;-T:'T.--:---; -:::.c-...7:r--- •-:"3 -'-'-- !.--:-'-,-. .:.-'.. :;.::f-',-.-z-:*--..---:41.---'-.;.t;-?.•.!•;.-F:.--,-': -; ':- '' . -_,.,..•:-.--;:-V-1,:.,:-.''',.:-.--- 1 :„,,.-41.--,'--1-='-%;. ,14--_-:-,'-.I•e7,,7-tr.;,--.27 :-'-,-:',;,=.;:'1-',``---,-,--:- •-_--- -.--: --:;. '.1''3-4''.7;,:--!.-;;;''''';.-- --.;,;:'-;--,;;--: :•:. ':-F:.- - ,77'....!:: :::-. i ..-..! -; ;.-. -,' ':. --,;-.411-..171'..:1':::1..ii-_ •-•:-:--1-• ; ' --, ..'. •.1-_;--,.._,S.--.-ar-;,7L-3-ft''-::-.*:,:.-..4-1*------_---f.:- - --_:-.-•_--:.--_,:_- _--• • ..•1 ",:-.I.'f*=•' .g-i-,'*-,:•- •?.-m-,.--,:-s--_ -1,•••-••,--k .1--:•-._f_`,::••••,--•,--.E.',,:..1--•'.i‘ •_••.• -.i: - 'A-, , :,,.--- -•-•••:-.7-..-;----_ :-='-t,!;,-;:-Y-i...'-•:, -"‘i----,==•_';•.=-•_,'1.-=-.•-..-- _ -• =' - : •-_•-:-_-•----,,,, ---,4_-- •:,•:,_- •:;7.,.._-.1., - - ---,--,- :- --- - - ' ••, --• - ," --, 4.-::: ' ::. --- "-- -.-.17•::=5-i-t-i-....4,•i•-•-•,:-,-;.--•-z.._-- :`-'-'...•- --•• :"---n--':._-•• -", : - •-.-• '-----1.- •-_:.0•'-i!'•• -ii;:'---• 1 '...._1- --. :.-1'_±•: :-:- .r•---;',=-,I; n.- --!--.::-.--AnTite .-*-7--,_ ,r,0,1•,-," --,-,,6•.,r.: .;;-',,-1;;;: - jr,:.-,-,•2i-r_.---1,---;=';'---*ie .?::'A-.,---:-,--.=:„44iEf -'---rg''.,.,-4.-.,4Sc.:741-- .,,..;-.::;;__.;• :1:---,. -: , :, .:._.. ,,,,,,:.....,,,-,.-...-,.:;_,:---T-:•-.- - _ ,.,__- ,--. f. -''''.. ,... ;t.-.,,3--.., -3-'...!3'..".i3.".i..I.....-,-1.;!..t".... : S'4733.-...":..-'..-1"-Q--,,V*;"`. ..73,.e.;.:.;'.;:."=....33-'33:"J:.',3.-::'7;:":`. ..."',.-'7"- , . ,.. -"...5.'3,..,.,..-..-:".r.. •„ -- -,.-:-_,.--• --. ' -,-.:"'-."" ----•--,..3 ---".-:.:;-'3 --..3 _-..-,;,-.z,:;.1'-': '-- ..'-i.;i:_....__'''''-.-131D,, .' -. "1.2-13„.1cF `,"---..:3,,,:1- r,--- '3". o'-.-._,_ _',, - ..",,, '_3-5,_..13",,3 I': .".;•....•_...-1'..'-,-,.3.'-,-.333 1",'-e.:,... -.+:e;.3",- 1.,',-",,-„", !,,,Z-;kqt-:-74 ::,!_-3e.•-:''.'!"--,-::,-..73.-,'-' -. . . .-- r•-:"..3..',1:".• ....,---:..it:1-,-.---.-;.'•. :.:".' -2 '' . . '-::-',.-.....; '3'f: --r-. '-','-f-",'3'-' '4'.3,;11;r1C ,--..3'.'.:Y7-t5..--,,:.:;3;‘,-;':,-. :1':"...-'31'.'"...'''-'f3,-- ' -- ' '"T-'':-:-3 -...'-';•.77i..-'.3- ''',3',-;t3'.'"." ,-.'-`-•.-3.:,'-...".=.•..-"..'3;.-'''' -- ;',.,-';:'.----r'-'''' : -- I . .• :' . . . - . . . . _. . .... . •.-. ..- . . .. .- ."---- • - . .- . . ,. .. . ..- -.... - • -3- ' . . • - ',.....- -•.'-'4-- ' :. . . : . .... - . ... . • — — — — — — — grey Silberstein A rv[x, Emma x D1 SOL PROPOSED x w art ` Architect&Associates,Inc. rPw(RTY SIIC 11.37.50.Il. .51.30.IT. 13'ALLOY PONT Or WAY t1INNCAR[A 1,3050.rt. it'ixw Sn( Pus S0.R. PeF wSIR VDSCNT Y 9OCWAMB 1,13 s0. Or arz fors So.rt. Pe:Or VI I31 N[cone ON.p•xn B.•0.1MNr3Vr1 LANDSCAPE SSO 10.1[w•ATEme i SO.R. 37.0 O.xOr SITE MOWS MC C. 2,3CO SO.I,. 31.1 x Or a,C .130 SC.rf, O.x M SITE I, coo'-D• I, na N1aY3uu rn,utamON! 1,311!0,rt. JI,L x Or arz I.AO•!0.f1 34.1 x 01 Pie — _ _ _ _ �Ij _ _ SILOWLILDSIMALM IUTUNO,0211.3.001.31MARI x,er3"IC IOU DOTRICr(OSSNAD) wwW,lllberstelneserXeCI.M KW • T .LAND AU MANI O1N[1 WOO USE(0YV)IIARNwO M U M= License AA21000771 vnct'per > • oRn¢uDaVSIryIA,!D1 Art0r 3.31 SPAM 6 - 9. rARNENT:11[DRCOY, S.SO Q ]A'-I' -o• Arch./1 hereby I. rn 1 10rAL REQUIRED, a.Sa Y^1on.r Nl.,,,„„.m.rep e a rwr DIAL Dx3n[ D O: SOO b •rntY nvnlr W Lrin Pico^r.TIN TOTAL rims{PACO(As Pc,LDR ua1(D)(p1l I COMPACT rae'l2,coon a.aw�f er•.el 1e'. 1C1AL FROMM: .OD ��? d / ■■�11�11■■�r��■I eNe.e.me"R.°rr eem.°N, Acvlom, r.oe SrANw•o 3•an wcwmxD ONs I ] •l A NON GCNC.WA ■M��I IIIIIlITIMIIIMI °"Y roomy"°°"...eF..:«°:< r.AR,xo r ��CI��■��M��I o Insy ie'Cr ea t SR.AECS Je I A olOOl.e Oraul Rrr OWIWA.a.ale P[OVIAID ACTUAL' S 6 ■■••■11■■■■■e■1 yr I•n p.rm.r en andc •.n. FONT u'-Or MIS. \♦ . LS'.2..1— r C \\2 P(CYCIARLC I11=• '-- --i,:.,11 oI,wrze oR Y s x 3 Dm>.as', sourx uom vs' �`I DUMRST(RS1 R TMMRw w• Le ns c c0 '" 11 ■.r DND xI1CyIS �.:; - - 0 �!' oI � HOUSE OF VINTAGE REWIRED ]3•-O•YAY1. yII� OMR00u ��t- 1III -I_-L-i"LM"`"000 �� 123 S.SWINTON AVENUE A"111L 3111 e.I a `L .ID.4D y o o^ _ DELRAY BEACH,FLORIDA anx3rac[ `_r"LLL� L, -,J r-e• V �G �I tm3C A ® ,�'� IIIY I Pt OWED ISx KP Anuu a.Ax w000 w "Q Y� C� D.I11111�► / „..„, limm 'lc* rA0a11Y DMR P1Iax I)g 42010 o I w'TOrli? Lueo, I.JO,AIMED PLAT Or 3VNDY 111D°RM[R! ! AaovD rw to Txm r�r TNumr,n Rao+Dro IN rur noelr,r uI [,or iN°Zg iAl w rALY rucN Ott, BI �� p,e, ;:c!:z,-- i \ ��5®,_„•,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,� M DA, 11CRIOA eu1WWL-CDX me] .21J2 ( OCCUPANCY. IO USE 1Y3,FLOOR `tY..0 S1R000RC Plsnxc alRucrUR[) FIFE LIN[COO["IIm3MCC UPAA lei-SOOC EDIVOx CHARIER Lr °O [W 1WRONG 3 SPRI I 5 UrANCIO.PROVIDE WARM/LAYrtf 109 TIRE SPRINKLER AND TIP[ILARY Q MM. • fOR CWRLlrz Slrz PUN SCL C-1 IL GROUND FLOOR ADDITION TOTALT=859 SECOND O TOTAL SO. FT=690 O __ OE4 SCALE: 1/8FL"OR= 1'-0" -- —;z-e a r SCALE: 1/B= 1-0" 1I11um 11I1111=..... ...NM L,:•—•:';''—' --F-.-.V • �SII,A , 1111115—�T 1 I � I I ---- .. — IIIMIMMI MI —.1.MS— — 1 ql _.�._— — ' 0(MINIM LLB— —r —\-\-- _ --A--+—\— -a— \ // \ • --eT°Smrr1 '- 0 WCINIITY MAP I �R D LOFT tar or Row j k j.1, , [_I III 111 II- 1.c,.. �I • 6:EXPANSE TO pE _h REVISIONS ° MAI b '9. NSECAI To —i1 II ?Rd Mr 1 111 !p 111''. -PIZC0ova LOCATION Aux N,A. C[, ! I I II I LOCATION MAP DECEMBEH 2O.2004 0 No•c.a I I �i A-1 .0 Drawn by:TOS OTHIRD FLOOR TOTAL SO. FT=345 ® OROOF PLAN ® DUrchltature1ProlecleV:o UsawnmpeldwgsVTyana-II_IS 04.IFwS 5 SCALE: 1/8"= 1'-0" SCALE: 1/8"= 1'-0" Jeffrey Silberstein Architect&Associates,Inc, 55.59' 01, a7x NI fix drool Daly Ow*,PbN.av11 ``��11''----,,\\ O / PARAPET I 3M:M14TLo333 rw:001.T60w1 m.•n•• \ r a / �'w VW / w"w.ailberateln■rchltect.can — \ 5926' MEAN HT 0 llll LI e•o•e AA20000ne A� :riff . 4,0440 N•r•ty rgrr..11 n { \ THIRD PLOOR • - eYw prep..t M�r.i roiw,rnu iFi er .y:. w.w.••n..nn.In.In a••r•rraa•4 Purged r Y • !•},I I�M MI„l n.I'I"pl au I P.• am ,°cw°""Lary,harm ii4 11I, s . u 1 'Cr•.r!e Nu'lel' i"'u:ly:i I. Pw,r"4..a.ae so....a.r 1' r My..w9 +14W Nkny■'.l 'Irywrl•"MIM••w'no rr eE o SECOND FLOOR 31.26. •. r milu l___,- iI l v"wan rd,mw•t. 411 101 s ■II ILIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIII_ HOUSE123 S.SOWINTON AVENUE FINISH FLOOR O 7 \ E l L less /•\ DELRAY BEACH,FLORIDA AVERAGE MEAN q p ELEVATION H LRCM OP ROAD OSOUTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION sGALEI I/e"= I'-o" 2 SCALE. / . r-o^ LEGEND OF MATERIALS C1 FLOAT PINIOII ONOOO qi 6TAINLE50 81 .LACK MIL pa $TANDIN0 MAN OALVALLW ROOF.OILVCN ElOLCAR 0LA66 OOMPAOT WINDOWD 1 00055 WITI YHIT6 PRAM:O NEW ELEVATION O• CONCAVE ere6ROW • l�l ill----III 55 S9' ECYOND tJ"� / °/::{7-2 PARAPET LJ \ O CONGV.'T60ALOONYEl El ` 55.26' d:\ y\ �� -V--- TOP OP RDOP =� l D ➢ ft 4 I t \ THIRD PLOOR T \ a \ r—{0 -- Pi 0 il t I 4'I 51.26' a •; V•o/ ".I6y i�iixl�:'ti9 •!l'Li:'L�_15111Vn , ` r —� —\ SECOND PLOOR \ I / 3'.0/ ll I'I�u uu� p _, �..L.�I I ....L.I"III0 !r-7 2r ' loe `-1: 4111'I.p1111IIIIII110110 IIIIIIIIIIIII IIIgiliiiiiiii ,t1.11 1 iffnl / PAST FLOOR � �f \ 1 \a❑-+ \\ AVERAGE MEAN lsl 01;20.10' ELEVATION �! CRONN OP ROAD REVISIONS CDEASTELEVATION OSEGTION 5 EXISTING YrEST ELEVATION SGALEI I/8"= I'-O" SCALE; I/8"• I'-O" SGALEI I/8"= I'-O" DECEMBER 23,2004 A-2.0 OWE by:TDs owcnkecvr•Prc4ecutlx Use 1dmaoeawamc ene_11 isa.a"y Silberstein &Associates,Inc. ea N119,1 rye oa,eu,n,rum,>,u,o T.I:eel•9eel.e ru:NI.p160Ma WWW.ellberelelnerchlted.corn ;P Llc•n•• AA2e00077e L4 Tot'OF Rt0} i Ms.e:I lvnbr rqr - vemn,;r4 Vf tt ::: -n w,vra.:y riyn.nPG. QZ,LG Iwbrrpr ep,e0e.•de [� f 14.{1.ey l Wer.r.{ - -•`J 1NIRb PLLIC6. C✓ -+ •,�ror.,4n M�niYWven�M�a.nl er a w w n my i aol•ol•e:nbu� e 4Q.ew�c�:M:, "- - � 3I.Z� ° HOUSE OF VINTAGE itt al ® ` 51 123 S,SWINTON AVENUE 1 SecoNo PLoon. to Miali 7 On 9 __� a ■1 I. DELRAY BEACH,FLORIDA }INl`JI PLcvRlobo 4 — __._ �I1I�N1�'g1111��I111_�lI �1 SoUru nvAT1oN Lt.: IJa"�I'c� /�NoCZTH 7'IrVA.TIoN • SCALP.:.1/8''• 'LC' G PAGP[T Te. I — S2.Sn h-IeP e>Pac/ t----�v_ 9 Y I Qz.w s=1 • 00 . I''T.. P 6Ccp1rD t'LOOlZ ;� j I II II II II .. s 1 • �I i • YI'111 II li.'eI11 III III `NIIII �6o - � 1111 •iNeT Iili�l�illfliri ill§ OJ Vligil 1 a wee REVISIONS AVERn6G W.A. Kam♦;' ' QI-MTIOU MSS Gnt-Ir4S [ROM Or ROAN 05/6AS O5.A,' EV/�,TI(7N _ 3 i:GT(o N•w car fl-�lxA'SIoN A_2.0 `JiALE., vs,11-o" ¢ gf_ALt: I/8°-ILo" O ISTnJG NEST ELEVATION) a Lam:I/8"..11-p'' LDrewn by;TDS D:AchltecturelProlect3Wlx bee1Oraa0eWvpsVd lanai d 05.dw0 HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH • ---STAFF REPORT---I MEETING DATE: April 20, 2005 AGENDA ITEM: 111-D- ITEM: House of Vintage, 123 South Swinton Avenue. Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class V site plan, landscape plan, design elements, and a waiver request for a residential extension to a commercial property. (-1I-1 L=11==i IiI 3 dCf I N.W. 3RD _ ST. N.E. 3RD St > a a Ill IN CITY W - ATTORNEY - o BUILDING �� - NI GENERAL DATA: II I MARTIN LUTHER KING JR, DRIVEN.E. 2ND ST. N.W.2ND 5T. > Owner Michelle Parparian I • Applicant Jeffrey Silberstein I CITI Y Agent Jeffrey Silberstein 3 • Location City Commission Chambers e I Z Property Size 0.15 Acres . I • Future Land Use OMU (Other Mixed Use) N.V.,. 1ST ST. N.E. 1ST St Map I P. Current Zoning OSSHAD (Old School I 3 COMMUNITY Square Historic Arts District) I CENTER Adjacent Zoning - North: OSSHAD - I• East: OSSHAD TENNIS OLD STADIUM SCHOOL South: OSSHAD SQUARE , West: OSSHAD & CF (Community ATLANTIC A V E. Facilities) SOUTH � "„ ' Existing Land Use Commercial COUNTY � z COURT a a .O H i Proposed Land Use Residential addition to the existing HOUSE - commercial premises. = Water Service Existing on site_ _ Sewer Service Existing on site. • . - j . ., S.W. 1ST ST. S.E. 15T ST. !NI i 1 Syy 2ND ST. SE 2ND ST -, I ■ ■ N I TRA The action before the Board is that of approval of a COA that incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage), pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F): ❑ Class IV Site Plan Modification; ❑ Landscape Plan; ❑ Design Elements; and, ❑ Waiver Request The subject property is located on the east side of South Swinton Avenue, between SE 1st Street and SE 2nd Street. �.-s-` <iZt-, V Yhx ; VVn.N,..� Bl'7L7� ',�fk rM•.--n��. "a` W ¢ x�t•y -' . ., *u"_�..,a.-g .-.._ __'��?n-..e.�i r•. dt'�.„.s;,.-..,,.,,..»-�` ...i,g-,.:..,o.-n^sz..� M..�c. .'�'-.3.:-s.-n �« ..�. -�,::.:.�..�ss.1k,._s..w�...r_ The subject property consists of Lot 3, Block 70 of the Sundy and Cromer Amended Plat. The 1,347 sq. ft. Masonry Vernacular structure was constructed in 1947 as a residence and displays a cross gable shingle roof and varying fenestration including metal casement, jalousie and awning windows. The building is designated historic and is considered a contributing building in the Old School Square Historic District. The property is zoned Old School Square Historic District (OSSHAD) and is used as a commercial premises. At its meeting of January 15, 2003, the HPB approved, with conditions, the conversion of the single family dwelling to office, the construction of a four (4) space asphalt parking lot to the rear (east) of the property and the creation of one parking space to the front (west), the installation of a handicapped accessible ramp, demolition of a 96 sq. ft. non-contributing wood frame shed, and the installation of landscaping. Approval was also given for waiver requests to allow parking in front of the historic building and a waiver to reduce the landscape strips on the north side from five feet (5')to four feet (4') and on the south side from five feet (5') to_ three and a half feet (3.5'). A variance request was also approved to allow a back-out parking space onto Swinton Avenue; provided that the space is • designated for_employee parking and that signage is provided directing patrons to the rear parking area. During its meeting of September 17, 2003, the Board reviewed and approved a Class 11 Site Plan Modification for the conversion from office to retail.On September 22, 2003, the applicant was cited by Delray Beach Code Enforcement for the removal of the original divided light, steel casement windows and the installation of 6/6 aluminum frame windows related to the elevation changes from the Class V Site Plan approval. The applicant was notified that the windows were inappropriate and that they must submit a COA for the installation of new divided light, casement windows. On January 7, 2004, HPB approval was granted, subject to conditions, for the installation of a free-standing sign, an under canopy sign, casement windows, and storm panels. A Class IV Site Plan Modification has been submitted for the addition of a 3 story residential addition to the rear of the extant historic structure. Meeting Date:April 20, 2005 Agenda Item: III.D. 123 South Swinton Avenue(House of Vintage) Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Page 2 PROJECT•P----1-1=- P;ROJECT-DESCRIP:TIOtskr, The development proposal includes the following: o Construction of a 1,882 sq. ft. 3 story residential addition to the rear of the building and demolition of the existing single-loaded four (4) space parking lot; o Construction of a four (4) space back-out parking lot on to the alley including one handicapped accessible space; and, o Installation of associated landscaping and relocation of the trash receptacles to the south side of the building. COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. Development Standards As indicated below, the proposal complies with the associated development standards of LDR Section 4.3.4(K) and 4.4.24(F) as they pertain to the OSSHAD zoning district: Required Provided Building Height (max.) 35' 34.71' (mean roof) 37.04' (parapet) Building Setbacks (min.) - Front 25' 29.65' Side Interior(north) 7.5' 7.95' Side Interior (south) 7.5' 7.5' Rear 10' 26' Open Space 25% 37.8% Section 4.4.24(F)(5) The floor area on the third floor shall be limited to 50% of the second floor area and the building setbacks or planes of the facade are offset and varied to provide visual relief. The second floor area is 690 square feet, and the third floor area 352 square feet which equals 51% of the second floor area. Also, the third floor has not been stepped back from the facade, therefore the proposal does not comply with this section of the LDRs. 123 South Swinton Avenue(House of Vintage) Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements • Page 3 Section 4.4.24 Old School Square Historic Arts District Parking Requirement: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(4)(a), all non-residential uses, with the exception of restaurants, shall provide one parking space per 300 square feet of total new floor area. This requirement may be reduced to one parking space per 400 square feet of total floor area, or by at least one space, where there is a mix of residential and non-residential use in the same structure. Additionally, pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(C)(2)(c), two or more bedroom dwelling units shall provide two (2) parking spaces per unit plus 0.5 of a parking space per unit in guest parking. Based on the definition of bedroom, the loft counted as a bedroom. Calculating the commercial car parking using 1 space per 400 square feet [LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(4)(a)] and calculating the new residential car parking using 2 spaces for a 2 bedroom unit and 0.5 spaces for guests [LDR Section 4.6.9(C)(2)(c)] has resulted in only 1 extra space being required. The application of LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(6) has then allowed this space to be omitted from the design. Based on the above, the parking requirement has been met. LDR Chapter 4.6 Supplementary District Regulations: Lighting Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.8, site lighting is required. Therefore, a condition of approval is that a photometric plan must be submitted which complies with the illumination standards of Section 4.6.8 of the LDRs. It is noted the tight fixtures must be decorative. Provisions for Ingress and Egress: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(2)(b), when the parking is next to an alley, the parking space and alley (paved) must have a combined minimum depth of 42'. The depth shown on the proposed architectural plans is approximately 32' while the engineering plan shows the depth at 40'. Therefore, a condition of approval is that the parking space and alley must have a combined minimum depth of 42' and that all plans are consistent with each other. It is further noted that the plans must indicate the improvements within the alley which include the paved alley and the 2' valley gutter. LDR Chapter 6.1 Design Standards and Requirements Undergrounding of Utilities: Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.8, utility facilities servicing the development shall be located underground. A note to this effect must be indicated on the plans. 123 South Swinton Avenue(House of Vintage) • Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 4 Technical Items: The following Technical Items must be addressed with the submittal of revised plans prior to building permit submittal: 1) Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.3(B)(7), the location of the nearest driveway or point of access of adjacent properties (including property across a street, which shares a common street with the subject property). If there are no driveways within 50', then they do not need to be shown; however, a note to this situation shall be provided. 2) Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.3(B)(17), the location of proposed lighting fixtures with a note pertaining to height and details of the proposed lighting must be submitted. 3) The architectural site plan (Sheet A-1.0) must indicate the existing and proposed improvements on the entire site. 4) Indicate on the plans the proposed use of the loft area. 5) Indicate on the plans the step down to access the first floor of the extension. 6) Indicate on the plans that all utility facilities servicing the development shall be located underground. 7) It is noted that the design of the addition could potentially allow it to be utilized separately from the commercial element of the building. As such, modifications to the floor plan may be necessary to eliminate this potential. 8) Indicate proposed site grades on the north side of the property. 9) Provide a typical cross section from the building to the adjacent right-of-way or adjacent property at all property lines. Pay particular attention to the grade differential from the proposed site to the existing adjacent properties and show the existing grades on the adjacent property. 10)The site is required to retain a 5 year 1 hour storm.(3.2") in addition to meeting water quality criteria (1"). Provide signed and sealed drainage calculations and indicate how storm water will be retained on site. 11)Indicate on the engineering plans how the roof drainage is accommodated. 12)Clearly delineate between the existing and proposed improvements. 13)The pavement indicated on the landscape plan does not match the pavement on the engineering plans. 14)Provide a note that water meter sizes are to be determined by the City of Delray Beach Utility Department upon building permit application and remove the size indicated on the engineering plans. 15)Provide proposed water meter locations. 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage) Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan,and Design Elements • Page 5 16)Indicate the location of the existing sewer service. 17)Provide on the plans the current City of Delray Beach standard construction details as applicable. 18)Provide a Pollution Prevention Plan. Prior to and during construction of all sites, the permitee shall implement and maintain all erosion and sediment control measures included in the required Pollution Prevention Plan. For projects over one (1) acre in size, provide a copy of FDEP Notice of Intent. ',71A11-4. ?, -1..-4u .,? '4 ` — t....ZI-c. , e P< .. _ _ Both existing and proposed landscaping will be interspersed throughout the property. The existing landscaping consists of-a Banyan Tree and Royal Palm at the southwest corner of the property, a relocated Gumbo Limbo Tree at the southwest corner of the parking lot, a relocated Dahoon Holly Tree on the south property line adjacent to the addition, and 2 relocated Sabal Palms on the north property line adjacent to the proposed addition. Further landscaping consists of a Crape Myrtle Tree, Blue Ledwort, and Wax Jasmine at the northwest corner of the property, a. Pigmy Date Palm, Wax Jasmine, and Cocoplum adjacent to the front (west) façade of the existing building, Simpson Stoppers along the north and south property lines, and Sword Fern at the southwest corner of the property. In addition to the relocated materials, the proposed landscaping includes 3 Double Alexander Palms adjacent to the parking lot, Simpson Stoppers(along with a 4' CMU wall) to screen the roll-out carts, and a Cocoplum hedge between the parking area and the addition. The proposed landscaping complies with the requirements of LDR Section 4.6.16 with the exception of the width of the landscape strips along the north and south edges of the parking lot to 2.5' and 3.5' respectively. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(3)(d), a landscape strip of not less than 5' in width, excluding curbing, shall be located between the vehicular use area and abutting properties and that a minimum landscape-barrier shall be a minimum of 24" in height at the time of planting along the perimeter landscape barrier that separates the vehicular use area from abutting properties. With the site plan approval on January 15, 2003, the approved landscape waiver was to reduce the landscape strips on the north side from five feet (5') to four feet (4') and on the south side from five feet (5') to three and a half feet (3.5'). A waiver has been further requested to reduce the north landscape barrier from 4' to 2.5'. Required Findings: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the granting body shall make findings that the granting of the waiver: a)Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; b)Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; and, 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage) • Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Page 6 d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. Given the site constraints, the waiver is necessary to accommodate the width of the rear parking area. In order to meet the parking requirement, the proposal must include the 4 parking spaces to the rear of the property and the 6" curbing. As up to 30% of the required parking may be used for compact cars, 1 compact space has been included to reduce the width of the surfaced area. There does not appear to be any other method by which the applicant can reduce the width of the parking area further. Given the analysis above, the waiver request will neither adversely affect the neighboring area nor grant a special privilege to the property owner. No public facilities will be at risk and no unsafe situations shall be formed by the granting of this waiver. Also, similar waivers have been granted under similar circumstances. Based on this analysis, positive findings can be made to grant the requested waiver pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B). Proposed Addition The extant historic building is a one story masonry vernacular building with a cross gable shingle roof. The .windows have varying light patterns including single pane and divided light designs with all windows having a vertical emphasis. The building is light green in color. The proposed rear addition consists of a 3 story dwelling in which the owner of the extant historic building intends to live. The extension will be of a contemporary design and will be constructed of concrete block and stucco with a flat roof surrounded by a parapet. The majority of the windows are 9' high with the east elevation of the second floor and the south. elevation of the third floor being almost entirely of glass. There are also two smaller windows on the first and second floors which are long and narrow with a horizontal emphasis. The front facing (west) facade contains no windows. The materials legend describes the windows and doors as being of clear glass with white frames; however, no mention is made of their material. Window and door specifications must therefore be submitted. There is a concrete balcony with a stainless steel cable rail to the south and east elevations of the second floor. The balcony extends 3' from the south elevation, and 8'. from the east elevation. The proposed extension will be attached to the extant historic building by a one story entrance vestibule constructed of concrete block and stucco with a sloping standing seam mill finish galvalume roof. The addition is to be painted `Regale Blue' in color. The first floor of the extension has an area of 840 square feet (including the vestibule) and contains a bedroom and bathroom. The second floor measures 690 square feet and comprises a living room and kitchen, and the third floor contains a loft of 352 square feet with access to a roof terrace.of 338 square feet. The site data table states that the dwelling will contain two bedrooms; however, the plans show a bedroom and a loft which is to be used as an office. The proposed use of the loft area should be clarified on the drawings. 123 South Swinton Avenue(House of Vintage) Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan,and Design Elements • Page 7 LDR Section 2.4.6(H) — Certificate of Appropriateness: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H)(5), the Board must make a finding that any Certificate of Appropriateness which is to be approved is consistent with Historic Preservation purposes pursuant to Objective A-4 of the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and specifically with the provisions of LDR Section 4.5.1. Future Land Use Element Objective A-4: The redevelopment of land and buildings shall provide for the preservation of historic resources. The objective shall be met through continued adherence to the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance and the following policies: Future Land Use Element Policy A-4.1: Prior to approval or recommending approval of any land use or development application for property located, within a historic district or designated as a historic site, the Historic Preservation Board must make a finding that the requested action is consistent with the provisions of Section 4.5.1 of the Land Development Regulations relating to historic sites and districts and the "Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines". LDR Section 4.5.1(E)-Desiqn Elements Pursuant to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(a), (c), (g), (h), and (j), "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating alterations or additions of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: (4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (8) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: - 1 (a) Height: The height of proposed buildings or modifications shall be visually compatible in comparison or relation to the height of existing structures and buildings. (c)Proportion of Openings (Windows and Doors): The openings of any buildings within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the openings exemplified by the prevailing historic architectural styles within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors among buildings within the district shall be visually compatible. (g) Relationship of Materials, Texture, and Color: The relationship of materials, texture, and color of the façade of a building shall be visually compatible with the predominant materials used in the historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. 123 South Swinton Avenue(House of Vintage) • Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 8 (h) Roof Shapes: The roof shape of a building or structure shall be visually compatible with the roof shape of a historic site, building or structure within a historic district. (j) Scale of a Building: The size of a building, the building mass in relation to open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, and porches shall be visually compatible with the building size and building mass of historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation states that: New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. Design Guidelines Locate an addition as inconspicuously as possible, usually to the rear or least public side of a building. In a historic district, consider the surrounding buildings and the compatibility of the addition in terms of size, scale, materials, mass and roof form. Do not introduce a new architectural style, or too closely mimic the style of the existing building. Additions should be simply and cleanly designed and NOT attempt to replicate the original design. Insure that the addition is secondary and subordinate .to the main mass of the historic building. Additions that overwhelm the original building are not an acceptable solution. Analysis • The proposal is for a residential addition to the one story extant historic building which currently has a commercial use. The proposed addition is to the rear of the extant building and, if it was to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property could be reinstated with minor repair and reinstatement. However, the existing building is a single story Masonry Vernacular structure while the proposed addition is a 3 story structure of a contemporary design. Although the proposed extension illustrates a clear distinction between what is old and what is new, it is incompatible with the extant historic structure and the other buildings in this section of South Swinton Avenue which comprises mainly single story Vernacular/Traditional structures. The Design Guidelines state that, when extending a historic building, a new 123 South Swinton Avenue(House of Vintage) Class IV Site Plan Modification,Landscape Plan,and Design Elements • Page 9 architectural style should not be introduced, and that consideration should be given to the form of the surrounding buildings. The third floor of the proposed extension will result in the extension being approximately 16.4' higher than the roof ridge of the historic building. This is almost twice the height of the existing building and, it will, therefore, be visible from the public right-of-way (South Swinton Avenue). This is in contravention of the Design Guidelines which state that an extension should be located as inconspicuously as possible, and to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(a), which states that the height of proposed buildings or modifications shall be visually compatible in comparison or relation to the height of the existing structures and buildings. The proposed windows for the extension are of two differing designs, neither of which is compatible with the historic structure. Those that are 9' in height are much larger than those generally found in the historic district and result in large expanses of glass on the extension, and the others have a horizontal emphasis which conflicts with the vertical emphasis of those on the original building. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(c), the openings of any buildings within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the openings exemplified by the prevailing historic architectural styles within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors among buildings within the district shall be visually compatible. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(h), the roof shape of a building or structure shall be visually compatible with the roof shape of a historic site, building or structure within a historic district. The extant historic building has a cross gable pitched roof while the proposed extension has a flat roof surrounded by a parapet. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(j), the size of a building, the building mass in relation to open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, and porches shall be visually compatible with the building size and building mass of historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. The front of the extant historic building faces west and contains a number of windows, a door, and a porch. The west facade of the proposed extension that can be seen rising above the historic structure; however, contains no windows or features and is therefore a flat, blank wall. The massing of the proposed extension is therefore incompatible with the historic building and district. The applicant has stated that painting the extension a muted blue color will help to blend the extension in with the sky; however, the proposed height and mass of the extension will still overwhelm the historic building. Also, there is no guarantee that the extension will always be painted a muted blue color and it is unlikely a condition such as this could be imposed on the building's owner. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g), the relationship of the materials, texture, and color of the facade of a building shall be visually compatible with the predominant materials used in the historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. On the completion of any addition, the addition should be painted a similar color to the extant historic building, which, in this case, is a pale green. Any extension to a historic building should be sensitive to the style, character, massing and form of the historic structure while not attempting to replicate the original design. This can be achieved in a number of subtle ways which may not be instantly apparent but become obvious as one looks more closely at individual details and elements. For example, if the 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage) • Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Page 10 windows on the historic building have a 6 over 6 light configuration, the windows on the extension can be the same style and size but have a 4 over 4 light configuration. If the historic building has lap siding, the extension could incorporate lap siding of a different width or profile. If the historic building has ornate detail, the extension can be designed with a plainer appearance. If the historic building has decorative shutters, the extension could have windows with impact resistant glass and no shutters. To make it obvious that part of a building is an extension to a historic structure, a date stone or plaque can be inserted in one of the external walls. As a guide, it is suggested that the proposed addition be of concrete block and stucco construction, have a pitched roof and be 2 stories in height. To distinguish the extension from the original building, the stucco could be of a different texture, the roof overhang or. pitch could be altered, or decorative elements such as shutters or a.simple motif at the window heads could be incorporated. The windows should have similar dimensions to those on the historic building but could have a different light configuration or opening mechanism. if additional space is required, part of the second story could extend beyond the first floor (in place of the proposed balcony) and this may also allow a more traditional floor plan to be achieved with the living room and kitchen being on the first floor and the bedroom, office and bathroom being on the second floor. Modern designs can be successfully incorporated into historic areas and, if the proposed extension was a.stand-alone building, its design could blend in well with some of the Art Moderne buildings in the Marina Historic District. However, it is inappropriate as an addition to a Masonry Vernacular building situated on this section of South Swinton Avenue. Based upon the above, positive findings cannot be made with respect to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8). '�.s. � *s. � 3, • �- s �- tz � rs,s,s s s S xN' i,� r3•.� s 3 r" v � � asa�� 7 t ._ � 4 REQUIREi BINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the approval of,development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record.: This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body, which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to consistency with the Future Land Use Map, Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency, and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations. Section 3.1.1(A) -Future Land Use Map: The subject property has a Future Land Use Map designation of Other Mixed Use (OMU) and a zoning designation of Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD). The OSSHAD zoning district is consistent with the OMU Future Land Use Map designation. Within the OSSHAD district, pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(B)(4), retrial sales through specialty shops are a permitted use. Also, pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(C)(2), on a parcel that has its principal use a non-residential use, there may be no more than two residential units, either within a separate structure or within a structure housing a non- • 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage) Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 11 residential use. Based upon the above, it is appropriate to make a positive finding with respect to LDR Section 3.1.1(A), Future Land Use Map Consistency. Section 3.1.1(B) -Concurrency: As described in Appendix A, a positive finding of concurrency can be made as it relates to water,sewer, streets and traffic, drainage, parks and recreation, open space, solid waste, and schools. Section 3.1.1 (C) -Consistency (Standards for Site Plan Actions): As described in Appendix B, a positive finding of consistency can be made as it relates to Standards for Site Plan Actions. Section 3.1.1 (D) -Compliance With the Land Development Regulations: As described under the Site Plan Analysis of this report, a positive finding of compliance with the LDRs can be made, provided the conditions of approval are addressed. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: A review of the objectives and policies of the adopted Comprehensive Plan was conducted and the following applicable objectives or policies are noted: Future Land Use Element Objective A-1: Property shall be developed or redeveloped in a manner so that the future use and intensity is appropriate and complies in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations, is complimentary to adjacent land uses, and fulfills remaining land use needs. The subject property contains a 1,347 square foot former single-family dwelling which now has a commercial use. It was constructed in 1947 in the Masonry Vernacular style and is a contributing building within the OSSHAD. The development proposal is for the construction of a 2%2 story, 1,882 square foot addition to the rear and alterations to the existing car park and landscaping. The subject property contains no special physical or environmental characteristics that would be negatively impacted.by the proposed development. Zoning Designation: Use: North: OSSHAD Private Residence South: OSSHAD Private Residence East: OSSHAD Private Residence West: OSSHAD and CF (Community Facilities) Si. Paul's Church/Commercial As noted in the above table, the abutting properties are all consistent with the subject property with regard to zoning designation and are generally compatible with regard to use. Based upon the above, no compatibility issues will exist between the proposed mixed-use development (commercial/residential) and the surrounding land uses, and positive findings can be made with regard to Future Land Use Element Objective A-1. However, as 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage) Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 12 previously discussed in further detail under the Design Elements Analysis and as noted below with regard to LDR Section 2.4.5(F) (5), the development proposal is incompatible with the surrounding properties with respect to height, scale, massing and design. Housing Element Policy A-12.3: In evaluating proposals for new development or redevelopment, the City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed • development will result in.a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. As discussed previously, the subject property is compatible with the adjacent properties with regard to use. Further, the development proposal will not have a negative impact on the surrounding area with regard to the criteria stated above' (noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns). However, there are concerns as to the design of the proposed extension and its incompatibility with the surrounding historic structures which may result in a degradation of the neighborhood. These concerns are discussed in further detail below. LDR Section 2.4.5(F)(5) - Compatibility (Site Plan Findings): The approving body must make a finding that development of the property pursuant to the site plan will be compatible and harmonious with adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole, so as not to cause substantial depreciation of property values. The subject property exists within the OSSHAD zoning district and is bounded by a combination of commercial, church, and residential uses. Compatibility with uses is not a concern, as the proposed mixed-use development would be permitted on the surrounding properties. However, the adjacent properties along North Swinton Avenue are primarily one-story TraditionalNernacular structures. The proposed extension is a 3 story structure built to a contemporary design which does not respect the majority of the requirements of the LDRs and the Design Guidelines with respect to new construction in historic areas. Based upon the above, the proposed addition will be neither compatible nor harmonious with adjacent..9nd nearby properties; therefore positive findings can not be made with regard to LDR Section 2.4.5(F)(5). t ' NAV"* p.. l .R'R'V- d _�✓«5..1. 14 0.' :Ft 1si';r i a PREVIEW BY dTHE 7 `*� �°�• �� 'Es x�.i.Y v- 4. �`N"t� it�'+`..�_aA_F-• 'z�- Community Redevelopment Agency The project proposed for the House of Vintage was reviewed by the CRA during its meeting on March 10, 2005. The Board recommended denial by a vote of 6-0, based on the building addition's incompatibility with the existing structure. ; � � FASSESSMEN AND CONCLUSiOt� r %� . The development proposal involves the addition of a 1,882 square foot residential unit to a contributing historic building currently in a commercial use. The proposed waiver to reduce 123 South Swinton Avenue(House of Vintage) Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 13 the perimeter landscape strip at the north end of the parking lot can be supported in order to accommodate the width of the parking spaces. With respect to the design of the proposed addition, however, the applicant is attempting to introduce a new architectural style to the extant historic building and this section of the OSSHAD. The proposed extension fails to comply with the majority of the design requirements set out in the LDRs and the Design Guidelines and therefore is not consistent with Section 3.1.1 and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. As the recommendation to provide a two-story structure will most likely impact the site design somewhat, the item should be postponed with direction. A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness and the associated waiver, Class IV site modification plan, landscape plan and design elements for 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage), by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines,.and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: ✓1) That the third floor area is limited to 50% of the second floor area. 2 2) That the third floor setbacks or planes of the facade are offset and varied to provide visual relief. X 3) That a photometric plan is submitted which complies with the illumination standards of Section 4.6.8 of the LDRs. It is noted the light fixtures must be decorative. jC 4) That the parking space and alley have a combined minimum depth of 42'. X 5) That at plans are consistent'with each other. x 6) That the plans indicate the improvements within the alley which include the paved alley and the 2'valley gutter .x 7) That revised plans are submitted addressing the Site and Engineering Plan Technical Items as indicated in the staff report, and the listed conditions. ✓ 8) That window and door specifications are submitted. cc p;='! ✓9) The proposed use of the loft area is clarified on the drawings. 10) That the applicant ensures that the palm to be planted adjacent to the east building elevation will not be in conflict with the overhang of the building. 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage) Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Page 14 11) That the design of the building elevations are altered to provide visual compatibility with the historic buildings within the historic district. C. Move denial of the Certificate of Appropriateness and the associated Class IV site plan, landscape plan and design elements for 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage), by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. +"-.. b e cv=s4 4 + a } • Ir-,^ c^.ts*.,..�,.n_.�-x.�r -.F.. _W'?f.— IAN Ntz",. Postpone with direction. Attachments: Survey,Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Elevations, Floor Plan Staff Report Prepared by:Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage) Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan,and Design Elements • Page 15 Y +,-,.yid b .y, ax'� 3z 'Y. A' , f' 11 A g t § ..+*: ".Y4"4-�.a:' _e•,'a4=1 �y•s .-C r (j�'Azi+" ', i 'iiW3-"'.t. ._. - s, z s. . Pursuant to Section 3.1.1(B) Concurrency as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs of the requested land use and/or development application will not exceed the ability of the City to fund and provide, or to require the provision of, needed capital improvements for the following areas: Water and Sewer: ❑ Water service exists via a service lateral connection to the 10"water main along South Swinton Avenue. ❑ Sewer service exists via a service lateral connection to a 8" sewer main within the adjacent north/south alley. Pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan, treatment capacity is available at the City's Water Treatment Plant and the South Central County Waste Water Treatment Plant for the City at build- out. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to this level of service standards. Drainage: A drainage plan has been submitted indicating that drainage is retained on-site via an exfiltration system. The proposal includes relocating a catch basin to accommodate the addition. No problems are anticipated. Streets and Traffic: The subject property is located in the City's TCEA (Traffic Concurrency Exception Area), which encompasses the CBD, CBD-RC, OSSHAD, and West Atlantic Avenue Business Corridor. The TCEA exempts the above-described areas from complying with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. The proposed addition will generate an additional 7 trips per day on to the surrounding roadway network. . Schools: As the subject property is located in the City's TCEA, this project is exempt from meeting School Concurrency requirements. Parks and Recreation Facilities: The proposed residential unit will not have a significant impact with respect to level of service standards for parks and recreation facilities. Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.2, a park impact fee of $500.00 per dwelling unit will be collected prior to issuance of a building permit for parks and recreation purposes. _ Solid Waste: At the highest waste generation rates, trash generated by the existing 1,347 sq.ft. office building is [1,347 sq.ft. x 5.4 lbs/sq.ft. = 7,273.8 lbs/2,000 = 3.6369 or 3.64 tons] 3.64 tons of solid waste per year. The proposed two-bedroom apartment will generate 1.99 tons of solid waste per year, thus the development proposal will generate a total of 5.63 tons per year. The Solid Waste Authority has indicated that its facilities have sufficient capacity to handle all development proposals till the year 2021. 123 South Swinton Avenue(House of Vintage) Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan,and Design Elements Page 16 +�'�� a��'"r"iY "c.}' F'::�f�'..s i etc r.<°R f�,�� tffttt,W4t-Vg-Wft:lf- EWQtPMPNPRFM,`'��?,:,�. �' s ��rk +�xt rt '`. - 4 ` . ^s ' ;K� i ��tl'tf? #? SR�Strf=,4EA{ tACfCk =� � A. Building design, landscaping, and lighting (glare) shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent Will meet this standard once a photometric plan is submitted which complies with LDR Section 4.6.8. B. Separation of different forms of transportation shall be encouraged. This includes pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles in a manner consistent with policies found under Objectives D-1 and D-2 of the Transportation Element. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent C. Open space enhancements as described in Policies found under Objective B-1 of the Open Space and Recreation Element are appropriately addressed. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent D. The City shall evaluate the effect that any street widening or traffic circulation modification may have upon an existing neighborhood. If it is determined that the widening or modification will be detrimental and result in a degradation of the neighborhood, the project shall not be permitted. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard • Does not meet intent E. Development of vacant land which is zoned for residential purposes shall be planned in a manner which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent F. Property shall be developed or redeveloped in a manner so that the future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; complementary to adjacent land uses; and fulfills remaining land use needs. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent " 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage) Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 17 G. Redevelopment and the development of new land shall result in the provision of a variety of housing types which shall continue to accommodate the diverse makeup of the City's demographic profile, and meet the housing needs identified in the Housing Element.This shall be accomplished through the implementation of policies under Objective B-2 of the Housing.Element. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent H. The City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent I. Development shall not be approved if traffic associated with such development would. create a new high accident location, or exacerbate an existing situation causing it to become a high accident location,without such development taking actions to remedy the accident situation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent J. Tot lots and recreational areas, serving children from toddler to teens, shall be a feature of all new housing developments as part of the design to accommodate households having a range of ages. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential developments located in the downtown area, and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. Not applicable. X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent • CALCULATED MEASUREMENT I" 9 a C. - DENOTES DRAINAGE EASEMENT �a-.� 1 tI� „© 1 '� I , E• -DENOTES IJRLJTY EASEMENT w�� .,"J` L10 v-^I I J 1,' %C -.DENOTES IRON ROD WITH CAP ONE 1 V � ,'y' I ! , •tl'j '' i" i • R. DENOTES IRON ROD(NO CAP) , !y61p 1Ltt1 �,?�--'..,� I • DENOTES CENTER LINE Dr ' _, - FOU v0 ik`GN•tOD FOU!p s�%P<?n/pp4, I�� Ib ' 1I ? a 1 ,la17-..400 1 • * • �NOC�nnf rE� f,. 1I II ° • 6'C[ --O.VO aI�of F A �yy ..a �3.00' y 95o�incr • �_ L r, yJ Z •St . . ... II: -' 1 • LAA J ` ,. ._..• ' 1�'I 1 LOCATION MAP . , 0 •/7 W° Re° • h� FOR THE BENEFIT OF; • (NOT TO SCALE) I K� G/I/C STU�C'Y�PES. ,�� P°4K.Nq L°T N re ea' �ID • N O // 30.00 44,5 a..z' `/Z3 J o -. MICHELLE PARPARIAN frLiJFM/IV/FP 6Looa `�'J p.64 ol, ',F ." SOUTHEASTERN ALLIANCE TITLE AGENCY Z A cercu �� GTtG.2/,90 L'/ o f,�jf,lo WI..10," `�4. 0$1 OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL.TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY DI o a Zao, ''s°� C; 29. tea:• ° NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE CO. b/b/a COMMONWEALTH UNITED MORTGAGE, 4 I o 14 29. a' rL/a, • Q` is ,. .':" <ii ��a w—T�39illiBia I -._.-...,....._.....•__.�.......,._..... ZI FO, 1 ,a �, T 'v. i.+o,aura. pv,,,l I'aJ C��//�lJ, 9 .. 4� 10a(00 • I 9P� 1 -� !., to.) /3'5 ' /91 6.'CL P,r„„L.+T • ml l n - z.r I ""/ BOUNDARY SURVEY F�univ J//eo v r'a� I t,k• `-FOUND • f/may Rao �NO Ara I I - • (4/4 GHFJ • • I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE.SKETCH SHOWN HEREON IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY MADE UNDER MY DIRECTION, AND THAT SAID SURVEY 19 ACCURATE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. THERE ARE NO LOT 4 APPARENT GROUND ENCROACHMENTS, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN AND THAT THE SURVEY MEETS THE,MINIMUM.TECHNICAL STANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES AND CHAPTER 81017-6 OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. • a / . DATE; l / ._. Uva9re; ,0.4.d,4:nvo sa-.ae6cw7 69.?/> /s/WA9 jL$S u•°wrGd,MRV.r,WG rar 6 9!/4rF-'�L/04.�« REGISTERED SURVEYOR NO. `uPls.41Vaa-u2vz•04a/ ra4V • PROPERTY SHOWN'HEREON HAS NO�BEEN ABSTRACTED BY SURVEYOR FOR RIGHTS-OF-WAY, AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD; ELEVA- TIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON N.O.V. DATUM UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED; ALL PROPERTY CORNERS ARE IRON ROD WITH CAPS, UNLESS'OTHERWISE NOTED; FOUNDATION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS LYING BELOW SURFACE NOT LOCATED, BEARINGS AND/OR ANGLES • SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON RECORD PLAT OR DEED CALLS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED;MEASUREMENTS MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNITED STATES STANDARD. UNLESS IT BEARS'THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA•LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER THIS DRAWING OR SKETCH IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT VALID. COPYRIGHT©2002 BY RICHARD L,•SHEPHARO k ASSOCIATES,INC.-ALL RIGHTS RESERVED • LB 1102 Jo. Tuaker •LOT 3 BLOCK 70 ADDRESS: r ' ' , s AMENDED PLAT. OF SUNDY 123 S. SWINTON AVENUE AND CROMER'S SUBDIVISION • DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444 4.iL. PLAT BOOK 6 PAGE 17 • FLOOD ZONE "X" RICHARD L. SHEPHARD and Aaaaalarea . PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA COMMUNITY: CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL Phone;COMMUNITY PANEL NO.; 12510Z-0004-D ( SCALE; 1'■20' BY;H.MILHOMME 3 DRAWING N0. 210 S.E.23HD AVENUE. Boob• S61)391-4386 MAP REVISED: JANUARY 5, 1989 P.O.BOX 760 • Boynton (Set)737-8648 'DATE; 9/2/03 FBI 684 PG;21 NO3-09-061 BOYNTON BEACH,FLORIO 33435 FAX (881 734^794a • D'a /,...__.__./�_.//.—___._.....—.__._ �" S.E,ttl STREET_ t.1. .�rr(/rrr✓rrrL(/.7.(/ ; t YAC i , 1,,15 ALLEY RIGHT OF WAY eI r. t ^ � --. f , / � n' 1 Lt uj/ nVn.0 i I 7. , r p '1d. 'TO.T'—.ISu wti," .. r.�_ ^ y I 50.00I :.ro mm war !`Oar Yre.m+Ar I t4J _T , �_ w.rr mm ro'rw f ft.7+ I(.I. +p I r 1• f' t Lf4:Jr w —'� 1 g��ALnxs'iii1ex.r.t. I I q x ha.r rr.w ,c..�� -VI `[<[r44L il�uu.+RNn) 0 / �\ } ; Y 1i A w in' xDPC�I " I I I ��_Q.._....^� �_ IM/rYt u11s•t11 al qq C6 / I • S.E.2nd STREET I ail ...WAR,rnt ro'Mm'I.M I i l —_ Z---' ill, 1 t B I ..I i ! r,I '..WAR, • �_ �� I NpLltt'm vtNLet I i!. ...nNAoa a • '. O Zt� 1 ��Iy oy �� ..CCn .�^_ E h 177 i.rwlxi°N AY NYt EE; 11 tram- IT_ �^to a�� 0 DtttuAr tueN,ho�m+ iii Y IN 0 PROPOSED 4I i M� 1 • i I V 1 STORY R „�„ •I t RES/DENCE . 4! • ..H.'.. r"1.1 nea e.,Aczm —._ I I 1 i FINISH FLOOR 10,60 i i Nro r.,11. ; MINN I IJ �.^ h�'!' Yp S.E.ire STREET I i-� 0 I u YY.� I R �l E •�� --- , I 1 'Ott, C O N T[N t N Yy S R. I R. " 1 6 R• - R N VI D14NIDt hi 8• u• r 1 d 1q TYPICAL P4.RNING SPACES DETAIL SITE LOCATION MAP L'I I noM RI ! KK kgyY N.77 6666 LO PROPERTY DESCRIPTION EXISTING Q ^ for a ILOa<70.ANCNO(O ALAI Of 1VNOY AND CAINEA't 0I9MNPPN 7 STORY ACCOAOINC 7p N!ALAI MCAlOf,Al RCNROlO IN ILA?Boar ItIAtC BUILDING 17,a N(AwuC MCOTOS 0,PAW IucN CONN1Y,/DMAA. I t y 1 1 1 0 N 1 I , I 1 — I X noaA I . 1 :Lro I SITE DRAINAGE Rkl • I cI nsnv AAaorro •I k R1 0 IN0AAin 1..247SSOO...11. Duosoo..0. r. I I Ott* ,III Ma I AAKMMT k AD(WAWA +.NO t0.ID 1.040 t0.fr. LANMAPC IX)t0.fr. 71+4 r0.III 'torousLl�Tt. a':�Qi 8'i% i1w Ni.i% ® I 1 Y7(ORAINACT CRI/TAIA: ACTA0N LeOfAN10!(OM NC N!f MACANOV+AMA 1 I I I rM 7NC 0,,,CACNC(IrINTCN ME-DnKLCNCN7 AND AOsf 01KLMNrNr I KLLVM.MCVIMO•0 1 MINI MONO(0:t0Wy4t1N7 I0(n+two 0AAINAOC SW:. CM'P'OOIIS I.7.ON'F I, 70•I. Os••' •• IS4W1((pp(TAa(0 N'00 0L7AAf 0l 7MNR' I ym Atrn N•th(IN•t+Do.0x7.7wr1•(I.25 70N)J A�2 •0117 AC.M.•1,177 CV.n, 1 t 14 —.__.T_.;1S7d"7.7o.—+d'( 1' . ow.1'MI POW IT. wD40''"' •••• // \\ r2WO MO •__• ///� L+•etel ANo ou'rriR•ru.D • a � R 0 o LEGEND D•T( 'S o. /SWINTON AVEN ftlJRND oAAct Ne,D! I t t U[D t o t /j�j�/// MMOJ(0 CAADC GSL I[ANI'Y EOYYINii IIDOINO NOT/01 CON111::::: ID ORKDDN N COxAC110N (� IVAfACC AVNNf 111Yt D•TC it/21/04 u••el- SITE PL A N • • SCA4(I 1••101 . 711 C•I • • • 00 0,lA llln«.1b 1w14 put...n.xa,N.. 111Lt.ew1C N1141 . Iu1aY.r.♦r,0a 1.1 00 ...Y..1w,.4.1M.•.10 1 1 ay On,.W. I.l....0.......1 0* .wwwlr w W I ..rroJ H01 I}•',1. ILMIIP H11 r1.yN I h ��)l llll)\)l )>l> Yr`^� n w«•i0,0,e0100 YJ.KTaw Y+a.I�MMJ '.. /% IS' ALLEY RICH OF AY n.. S 15' A LEY RIGHT 0 W • _.rclsr.surree. _.._.. rrsr.tWlY2LT '1Jsa I 0 .� SITE DATA Jxa 50.00' ��` Iw a N l( I • MY p a�x 1 L'L 50.00401,:tgargr+aexYJclr.acollnar.ra..•.w ilie•rr. 3y' i , ® i 01N 101 YM n1WYl.1OIIIO 111o1101.00n.a....., µj1L ` Q:. rr •% g Q N Y1onel.....M au 0 //•�1`O�� 8 N I d r.ur..lrwln tlrw Y•.. wemaru Yu1�Yinal«..Y z•+IJ Innai• Q• &ql�p� .„.., ! V. 111 Aft 1 •, �/� rlwl�gl•1AWAY1.1NIgq.O �,sle�y0 O. I—, • 1 A• Gy RERISCAPE CALCULATIONS ataertwaaJgoluooMt ti:'!a� ' , E <_ vJyt.uNaw J1 . I�no nw.arovxocow r«.,r..N tIP�\' -sw•,: w'eS'r m -..-'�I�� Zoff,'vxeGCNIA0c oo {r'.Ce 0 •U oI - Moor'!nK•r•WM MIN ,vN0.1atlW.w.11MY .N 1.n. II I ( .60N11(1 IrK s•(•II.MUN Uti_ �1 - II�nV r .IJnd•uM•w+Wl.0.o10•Y.rMI 1 ILsl t*Cir..i IR C7 `, N ± I - '�� .•as w v4l. 1.41 et at I=ar..a'r�•w la s 11 + •1H,�I (w Y41 • I .. .m.iievWo I.. IN) A jJ•t-��" ' VVV��♦♦♦ vti .1(11Ow v V ::: Z ; ! PROPOSED , EXTG.MATERAL SCHEDULE rr' PROPOSED �a,„� @ U 2 STORY y 0' Key BolonICSI/Common Name 23TORY I'�, 0 �y 04 • RESIpENCE I ��) RESIDENCE m oq Q C I.ec••W/COx .,..0.e Qr \� I LL• N �! i • ��1 I Uy7 iN.yAeWI.Oe.r 13,4I p'JaeCOWpw - ..1."•. 2 I • t �I o PROPOSED MATERIAL$CHEDUI.E =Mt[t(4,M.PION(2) [� o ® V ! EXISTING Q. rw ea•OOaI/caOOIM Nuns eN. - • ISTING in • I STORY © I 1 m• I:Y wr.r.0.1 mttv.H Nr..•1 un.ew STORY I��E(��t1]�(t '. 1 ei1• a OrrwH.ioantaeO PION« 1aueO. 'v BUILDING • O. 1 ^• ��' BUIICINC " AIL Lt'"I. .N PpalwprM«OMY x '+rr.b. 11AW,OIr. I IA,nYne•.Iq•W ILnt+M.GryY ue1/.o1.Oa _ 1.. e.• SOY PON NkaIM 1MIao• 1 11 a CN1w.Y.nu14MY C...p1r. 1..0430. U r,.nNl arw NMa 1MWI. I• I I r «Ma3NRIHN 11MCl. ,0. wlmr l...1...4 Mal vxk.>u+aNJ I j ':.1—_ — - - - -'..— l� W m I Q tr....�MI..r....1...MaTr Ur Q De ' i (OVU(I v,MIXI. I .•.•M4wn•,r••M«rr rr..r •w.l..rrx.rNµMu 41) *eV. 11111 NHKI.aNXf• --� 1 W • I a--e.:.w.pr—. �� vxH.Otuvro _ ....r.N.M .r w. Ml'•�I� -... .j %mom" o . • ri [tlx lx.. a 6 > :1 � 14 ir'w .. ..�. pu.w . µ.....Iwo.w... .N..+ry`M A; j% Md tmr.avnaJ O 0I ..Yw�.urH. ....r :l.'': 0L�ili 9 Q :?' Oa Q 4rll 1'VOW qp(I/Ir<T u.•L » •`a•ur..w. •Ina • '• , �Y (Xtl 1' •.qnp MO �I. , ry 1f•CI.VnM'D LU)ICF "N y %/� 'CW1 A,v N © t/) 1� /////lll///Z. ////l .., ,,... ...„?, .� 3: Mr.(aw % .�� / ill .�}�. M '// Plriuraooiili' �OYifbl•' i \ •Pa 0'� WINTON AV U • • ,. >: '�• .a WINTON AVENU _ I. I iiifi�� • fir y : :. :,...,..•. iiViC�� °"" • MW, pJ �.r.n.r .= ,��, " . �.Y+1...} wOrr•tir••t 9.17-02 • • 14 I..r1y+ �I.Il :.1r 3rr .•\ =.1 m. r.. 4P." 1_9'. S I 7• E . P L A N' a ;•OTIR—,. �„x:., a.. .1a S I• .T E P L' A N 1 • SCAIC, 1•.10' .n.�}. i w!!.L.i4'�'.' .'7'+'wM�ILLr',!! I, �+.5 y4tr i.'—' ' SCAT C. I.••101 DAB TA • _ _ _ _ _ _ Jaffrey Silberstein Arohftnct&Af/oclelel,Inc.' [Aflrl I"mI eA0r01t0 .Or fit[ Y 11'AJJSY Wart All 61t 00 I0.rt. 2140 ID.It, 1 Q C a`' I,!•110.r1, 1111 OF II 11W Y0.rt. .11[I Or mR 131 NI IV Xing DA0.rM60,rArad WO woc«mot«A1nI 1.000 SO ii: Ci:6 i 01 II 07 78.R: 13.1 i'OF Iln wlo• of1 AAp 1,000 10�rt. 0.I Or 91I .1f0 10./q Im•O or LR TN:NI•AFNp /uINIQ1/Mlt A,[A /.I T.Y0.17. 11.1I Or On IAA SD.rt. 36.6 m Or Dirt �. �. ♦ �. r Wa"N,111berrtelMlChltect.Card .OLD ICxWL fODAA[YIIfOAIC AIM O11fAICt(01fxAO) IF /� MW• 1• 4 t 4xp p'('yxr D1MI,WEED Ulf COW) ze I• �"� h i a I p re M16000T1/ '1+G,t ACQUIRED-I.. •DO• 1.11 SPACES OOVALT. Ham• r." YW11 Woos/eyeMI�ry{ `Y[M,t HMG. I�IO I Nr Imm� P••e m,t r,e"IOIDi m0D irn.M••n1/..DI .•M r. .[I YAC[IA{POI 1D1 4.I•(0)(1)1� 1 rv1 AR M nrnr+.4 '.nomnD, [.Do ■■■■■IN■■■■■■■I wrd n•v 1.nA F. rr.1 • � to a ,� A'xux caxa.rYta. ■■■■LIB*rJll�■■■■I .a.n u.eyr 1.MMux a nomcco� Lo0 MOW,Dram Ixttv0lxo ex[ _ ■■■■t11■■■■■■■I •mrenun�Ar�wu1.'""•w W' •"'' ■■■■■1/■■■■■t■1 .r.n Ar7•Sw."+a u A — ■I A[OV A[0 AMA, rurnr6ln•n 71at wren 1,10 NT[,a, !i!1N m[[1.16, fOVx /�`�' �� '"�Y"" 1-.. ,— lin, HOUSE OF VINT GE 2113. �o Ia«.I,0 ,. K L L"'w"°°" ■1 123 S,SWINTON A ENUE et0 11.'•YAAnluu L '' 1C: �•�• NI 1j s , ` �a ERACH,, .. `t" II,11:4111E.E. � 1111 .. I In 23% YYY 1Y •f'11"D I Jail At 11.rx .YJ'... ��1�1 I© • 1J A"10 •ji?* if p,n orv,ruDx ...i1-31.I QOtO rr • . 4 nLv � • LLOCA 10.AY1rg rul or lux.Ax0 C,IM I ' , I •••••�•',,,..•.•, • NI�DA, $/.Or t 10 MI O A,,xt A[. Al NACHO 1x rut n, IIIII'"'�.......' r`racl n,Dr txc rvevc AUD,D1 0l PAW Icacx couxrr, �.....,. -::.............:.... „.........,,5 \ aRC (r/ 4.Eqpt,.foci Sap) 1 riA•1 rLcaA `[xllTlw erKl.'1L� in cowl+viol V/t „ ew• (I PS, / 6•e' i0000 10 f11 00 000*CIN-[OD!0D1,Icx O4N0[A 1.1 ? ' • .! 0,1 1r,IxxllD Q Y'.'o11[Ialull IIAYIrt/o,lilt IrAINA1t,APO hilt AIAAN 0On COO m life r1.AN IQ CM . h 4 SECOND FLOOR TOTAL 5Q.FT•bg0 • • GROUND FLOOR ADDITION TOTA SQ.FT 1* COSGALEI IFLO I'-O" —^— --1r-i u r OSC ALE, I/8"• 1'-O" •‘ 11-, -------___ _--...._—__ lit _ _ 1.1. I at, I<_ _-4 II VICINITY MAP • I■■1<0'''''A for or•OO, Lilb_ IIIIIIIIU IIIII■■■~■■■■ D rrr.Dr wcA. AR a Rotor ■■■I.■■■■■ tI ' 11.1.1! I ■■a■■■■■ r""_ RhEVI IONS p I A11111111 Ai> ...,( 6, �"r :us4 ' I II Nv,vr.lr— 5 I,I H1li' - 031396 _........................ 00000 «ur N,T,I, I ® DECEM8ER',2004 LOCATION MAP ,O xD.a.0 V . tl Drown b;IDS ROOF PLAN ® C teGNn P o e01 It UeedlmapeWpe•••/01- _I mg 5 THIRD FLOOR TOTAL 50.FT•545 OSCALEI I/8"• I'-O" • 1 Jeffrey Silberstein 2—\i n 1 I kI Gin w♦Atodtt111 Ir d. 5999' / PA. MEAN NT69.76' It.N■ I90.I •.i 6✓/1111::9 11.N/l il.li 1•..::: 4 111 1 If11.1/1I1I1 • 14.111:Irlurril:111nNnr.rr:U,49.• qt / 10•4N. 1 q L I g 9 I i w,wlWlw ••1 wpwry r..w-'.tuwN'W ;I THIRD THIRD TLOOR .._--_ n N.44 444,44441 4 Now.4.... }I1 I .. • ' • W rM.M•0.1Mq q. --Igiw ie "wwn"'".Iww""wwn$.":r°4 rro Isr.wrw.4:ro.,i rv.1 Il I� 1 •�I.:�IM•:.:n+rl ywrl""�' IwMn IMn�Yi w en4 wM✓'1 rr ' IA4MI .PIN+PI^•W 'i�Nlrr:•n MWWr'rM✓. ® IiD 4\ 58GOND.•LOO.[ r.a' ii`�` mas ► �1== FQ{W7j 9 " rL -E:r ' HOUSE OFT• III''I 0 7o.6a - t_ 123 S.SWINTON AVENUE "' LIwEN.LOOK ` "-"--; _10.69' y --n'.•' •90 DELRAY BEACH,FLORIDA L R. • AVERG MEAN T 4 0 ELEVATION H. CRON.OI'ROAD iSOVTH ELEVATION • - NORTH ELEVATION :SCALE: I/8"a I'-O" OSCAL•E. 1/8"• l'-o" LEGEND OF MATERIALS O FLOAT 4114p1 611440 0 644.IN.I$/TE0.GA.L.MIL Uj ITAN0I14 ISM.I.LVALVME 9001,61Lv.R OGL.AR 61.4.66 40.'1'441'N,NDOW.1000R6 WTN 1.111...NE. i ❑1 CGNCR,1.EYEObN 5559. A Nets ELEVATION �j PAMPET T 0 BEYOND O GONGRETC O.LGONY Ns. K C3—\ / 114 53.26' A . L., I TOP OP ROOF Y .1. 12--- I D 6( I i — 4 THIRD FLOOR T � • ^ I I 'l \\\ ----- 1 1 1 1 i § j I l ¢ y :vJPSrrwSw :.Nw.l: Pll u l 11 l 9:.76' ,l �I 6• = .`6• '.0 wtlute�eiiiiiu��:irrmw.- SECOND r'400R 'd —— va Tire nnnu .:: 9 '` =__ ` _ ` p IMF. I�1��._. nl ,,,,..1.41.1.. .. : 70.00' '' Jry :.06 .I {'NI�IlIIIfllill Iilllllllull n`�I�if(U 50 P1R0T P400R �"•'• ( "" / • J ID.99' AyERAOE MEAN T LW ELNATION GROYW OP ROAD • REVISIONS LEAST ELEVATION OSEGTION OEXISTINS WEST ELEVATION JSGALE: I/8". I'-O SGALE: I/8"■ I'-O" SGALE: I/8"0 I'-O" • . • A-2.0 onwn by:TOS Q'lAfcMoclurs1P:o1101Vdix I ,i;4\do lnl-it-li-O4.dwp ' JUNE MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA MEETING DATE: May 18, 2005 LOCATION: City Commission Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Francisco Perez-Azua, Maura Dersh, Randee Schatz, and Michelle Reich MEMBERS ABSENT: Jeffrey Silberstein, John Miller, Jr., and Linda Lake STAFF PRESENT: • Warren Adams, Brian Shutt, and Denise Valek I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Perez at 6:00 p.m. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. No one from the Public addressed the Board on non-agenda items. Chairman Perez read a summary of the Quasi-Judicial Hearing procedures. The Notary swore in individuals for testimony. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Ms. Schatz, seconded by Ms. Dersh and passed 4 to 0 to approve the Minutes of April 20, 2005 as written. • III. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS A. 1109 Seaspray Avenue (The Price House), Individually listed, John Papera Item Before the Board: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of aluminum framed impact resistant windows. (Quasi-Judicial Hearing). Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. The "Price House", named for its original owners, was originally located at 526 North Ocean Boulevard. In 1998, the property was purchased for the development of five multi-million dollar homes that forced either the relocation or demolition of the dwelling. Rather than demolish the home, the owners, Steven Hayes and Patricia Okenica, moved the house and the two-story garage to its present location at 1109 Seaspray Avenue. The house was constructed in 1935 in the Monterrey style and designed by Delray Beach's first "city architect" Samuel Ogren. The property consists of Lot 11, Seaspray Estates, Delray Beach and is situated on the north side of Seaspray Avenue approximately 300 feet west of Andrews Avenue. The main block of the wood-frame house is two story and sheathed in clapboard. The property is zoned R-1-AAA. Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 18, 2005 On March 3, 1998, the City Commission approved designating the property as an individually listed historic property due to its architectural significance. During its meeting on March 18, 1998, the HPB approved a COA for the rehabilitation of the property including site preparation, mechanical upgrades, and general repairs related to the relocation of the building. The City Commission later granted an ad valorem tax exemption for those improvements in February 2000. The tax exemption extends from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2009. On May 2, 2001, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed and approved improvements to the property for the Sickle family, who purchased the property the same year. The proposed alterations included a two-story addition, new roof, balcony extension, replacement of an existing window with a door, relocation of rear windows, landscape plan, and related interior improvements. The Board approved the requested improvements with several conditions including that the three, modern, single light windows on the first floor, south facade (facing Sea Spray Avenue) be replaced with those that are more suitable for the period of construction. Permits were issued and the work was completed; however, this condition of approval was not met. As the Certificate of Occupancy was left pending, an application was submitted to the HPB to request reconsideration of the condition of approval to replace the modern windows with more appropriate windows. The application was denied and the applicant was instructed to apply false muntins in a pattern deemed appropriate by the project architect and that the design was approved by staff. The current proposal is for the installation of aluminum single hung impact resistant windows. The most appropriate method of storm protection for this property would be to use the existing wooden shutters or, if the shutters would not provide the required protection, to install removable hurricane panels. The applicant; however, has stated that around 2/3 of the windows were replaced with aluminum windows prior to him purchasing the property. No application for the installation of the existing impact resistant windows can be found; however, elevations from a 2001 application to alter the dwelling depict some aluminum-frame windows. The photographs submitted by the applicant indicate that the existing aluminum frame windows are designed to look like they are single hung but are actually casement windows. The applicant wishes to replace the remaining historic wood frame windows with aluminum-frame, single hung impact windows to fully protect the dwelling from hurricanes and to give the dwelling a consistent appearance throughout. However, the applicant has not been clear as to where on the dwelling the windows he wishes to replace are situated. If he wishes to install aluminum windows to the side or rear of the dwelling, and some of the windows to these elevations are aluminum, this could be supported. If; however, the applicant wishes to remove wood frame windows which are visible from the public right-of-way or from a façade which contains all wood windows, this, as in similar applications, could not be supported. The three, modern, single light windows on the first floor of the south facade (facing Sea Spray Avenue) are still in existence and the applicant wishes to replace them with aluminum-frame, single hung windows. The removal of original materials from a historic building should be avoided unless the material has deteriorated beyond repair when it should be replaced with an identical 3 ' Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 18, 2005 material. In this case; however, 2/3 of the windows have already been replaced and the applicant wishes to replace the remainder for increased protection and to give the historic dwelling a uniform appearance. As part of this proposal, the applicant will also be removing the three inappropriate modern windows which do not open from the south facade and replacing them with functioning windows of a more appropriate design. The installation of aluminum frame, single-hung windows with a similar muntin profile to the historic windows on a façade with existing aluminum frame windows can be supported if the windows are not visible from the public right-of-way. For windows visible from the public right-of-way, the frames should be manufactured from wood and be given a similar muntin profile to the original windows. It is also recommended that the applicant replace any aluminum frame or casement windows which are visible from the public right-of-way with wood frame single hung windows. A further condition of approval is that clear glass is used in the windows. It is noted that the building retains many of its original wooden shutters and shutter dogs. Although the installation of impact resistant glass means they will not be required for storm protection, it is a condition of approval that they are retained and repaired or replaced as necessary as they contribute to the building's character. Where the original shutters and dogs are beyond repair or are missing, they should be replaced with shutters and dogs of an identical design and material. Based on the analysis above, positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8)(c) and (g), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation can be made. Mr. John Papera, Jr., 1109 Seaspray Avenue, Delray Beach, advised he purchased the home in the middle of hurricane season, and this season will be the same. We had a problem getting insurance to cover wind damage. We are looking to replace the windows and keeping the exact look and feel of what we have now. They are all single hung sash type. The windows in the front do not open, and the side windows have vinyl replacement windows that were installed prior to the house being moved. Our intent is to replace all the windows. Chairman Perez advised that under condition no. 1) you are required to have wood frame windows. Mr. Adams advised that based upon decisions made in the past it is recommended that wood windows are installed, and in some cases we have insisted all the windows are wood frame. However, on some houses there is a mixture of windows. The applicant is willing to replace all the windows. It is acceptable to have aluminum frame not visible and wood on the visible right-of-way. We are looking at the best solution. Ms. Reich inquired if there was a difference in the cost between the aluminum and wood. Mr. Papera advised he did not get quotes on the wood frame windows. I would request that the Board consider allowing the aluminum windows. Chairman Perez advised the aluminum windows will take away from the home's integrity, and this house deserves to have wood clad windows. Chairman Perez advised Mr. Papera to get some estimates. 4 ' Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 18, 2005 Mr. Adams advised because there is such a mix of windows on the house, aluminum windows could be put on the side and rear but aluminum clad with wood frames should be on the front of the house. It was the Board's consensus to use the wood clad windows in the front and aluminum on the rear and side. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing. It was moved by Ms. Schatz, seconded by Ms. Dersh, and passed 4 to 0 to move approval of the COA for 1109 Seaspray Avenue by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and (c) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: 1) That any impact windows installed within view from the public right-of-way have wood frames and muntin profiles to match the historic windows; and 2) That clear glass is used in the windows; and 3) That the wooden shutters and shutter dogs are retained and repaired where necessary; and, 4) That where the original shutters are beyond repair or are missing, they are replaced with shutters and shutter dogs of an identical design and material. B. 302 NE 7th Avenue (Hartman Townhomes), Individually listed, George Brewer, Agent Item Before the Board: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated demolition request, Class V site plan, landscape plan and design elements for the construction of a townhouse development. Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. Ms. Dersh drove past the property, and Chairman Perez spoke to Michael Weiner, Esquire regarding the project. The subject property consists of Lots 13 & 14, Block 113, Highland Park Subdivision and is located on a .33 acre site at the northwest corner of NE 7th Avenue and NE 3rd Street. The property contains a 2,752 square foot, two-story Frame Vernacular style dwelling which is known as the Hartman House, a 324 square foot concrete garage, and a swimming pool. The 1923 dwelling is listed in the Local Register of Historic Places and is zoned Medium Density Residential (RM). The dwelling is currently vacant. An application for Class V Site Plan approval for this development was submitted in November, 2004. However, as the two-story structure is non-conforming with respect to setbacks, the repair work that could be undertaken to it could not exceed 10% of the 5 ' ' Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 18, 2005 current replacement cost in any 12 month period and the cost of exterior modifications could not exceed 15% [LDR Section 1.3.6]. In the case of individually listed historic structures; however, the cost of improvements can exceed the 10% interior and 15% exterior maximum thresholds. In March, 2005, an application for historic designation for the Hartman House was submitted. The designation report stated the house was eligible for listing on the Local Register as it is associated in a significant way with the life or activities of a major person important in city, state, or national history, exemplifies the historical, political, cultural, economic, or social trends of the community in history, and portrays the environment in an era of history characterized by one or more distinctive architectural styles. The designation was approved by the City Commission at the second hearing on May 3, 2005. The applicant has submitted a Class V Site Plan Application for the repair of the extant historic dwelling, the demolition of the garage and swimming pool, and the construction of two new dwellings. The townhouse development proposal includes the following: • Demolition of the garage and removal of the swimming pool. • Repair and alteration of the extant historic building which involves the construction of a 958 square foot addition consisting of a two car garage with a bedroom on the second floor. The interior alterations and addition will result in a four-bedroom unit totaling 3,247square feet under a/c. • Construction of two new dwellings, one of which will be a detached three story structure to the west of the historic dwelling, and the other will be a two-story structure attached to the north façade of the historic dwelling. The three-story building (Unit A) will contain 2,654 square feet under a/c with three bedrooms and a two car garage. The two-story unit will contain 2,400 square feet under a/c with a one-car garage and three bedrooms. • Associated landscaping and construction of paver block parking with a driveway from the alley which accesses the garages of Units A and C. The proposal is for the construction of a townhouse development which includes the restoration of the Hartman House (Unit B), which is listed on the Local Register of Historic Places, and the construction of two new dwelling units. Unit A is essentially a detached dwelling three-story dwelling (attached to the Hartman Houses by only a covered trellis) and Unit C is a two-story dwelling attached to the Hartman House by means of a double garage on the first story and a bedroom on the second story. The Hartman House (Unit B) is a two-story structure which was built in 1923. The dwelling consists of stucco over wood framed walls with a pavilion-style roof over the main body of the house and a hipped roof section over the projecting section to the front (east) façade. The proposed landscaping comprises of a mixture of existing and new plants. To accommodate the development proposal, a number of trees must be removed from the site. These include two Schieffiera Trees, a Carambola Tree, an Areca Palm, a tropical Almond Tree, and three Mango Trees from the NW corner of the site, a Norfolk Island Pine from the south property line, and, two Black Olive Trees and a Schieffiera Tree from the east property line. A number of existing trees will also be relocated. These 6 ' Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 18, 2005 include a Rose Apple Tree and a number of Sabal Palms. Existing trees which will be incorporated into the landscape proposal include a Ficus Tree at the southwest corner of the property, and a Spanish Lime Tree, Oak Trees, and Mango Trees at the north property line. New trees proposed for the site include six Gumbo Limbo Trees, a Carpenters Palm, two Fishtail Palms, seven Coconut Palms, eight Travellers Palms, and two Cat Palms. The proposed underplanting includes Simpson Stoppers, Bush Allamanda, Cocoplum, Bougainvillea, and Jasmine Vine. The City Horticulturist has reviewed the proposal and determined the proposal complies with LDR Section 4.6.16. The Hartman House (Unit B) is a two-story structure which was built in 1923. The dwelling consists of stucco over wood framed walls with an asphalt shingled, pavilion- style roof over the main body of the house and a hipped roof section over the projecting section of the front (east) façade. There is also a single-story projecting central section to the east facade. The front (east) facade of the dwelling has a classical appearance as it is perfectly symmetrical and balanced. The central section of the structure projects 8' from the main body of the dwelling and contains the centrally-located main entrance door. The dwelling contains the original wood frame windows to the front façade which are of a traditional four over one design. The historic structure has almost no ornamentation apart from a wheel window to the south façade; however, this may have been added at a later date along with the corresponding out of proportion window on the second floor as they are off-center and inconsistent with the symmetrical design of the building. It has been recommended that the both these windows are retained; however, as they are part of the development history of the building. The lack of ornamentation on the Hartman House contributes to its classical appearance and, as such, it has been recommended that no ornamentation is added during its restoration. Proposed appropriate works to the exterior of the structure will consist of replacing the shingles, the insertion of a more appropriately designed window to the middle of the second floor on the south façade, window repairs, the addition of a canopy over the front door, repainting, and the demolition of the existing garage and swimming pool. The stucco walls will be painted light 'Sea Froth in color, the window surrounds will be 'Distant Gray', and the doors will be 'Shadow Gray'. The proposal includes a two-story, pitched roof extension to the north façade which will attach the Hartman House to Unit C. The east elevation of this section will contain two arched garage doors. The walls will be of cmu with stucco to match the Hartman House, although the first floor will have a Cyprus lattice pattern insert. The windows on the second story of the proposed addition will be of a one over one design. Internally, the ground floor of the Hartman Houses contains a living room, dining room, Florida room, library, kitchen, laundry, a bedroom, and a two-car garage in the proposed addition. The second story contains three bedrooms, a den, and a further bedroom in the proposed addition. Unit A (west side of the property) will be a new three-story dwelling with a pitched, asphalt shingle roof. The projecting section of the front (south) façade will be faced with hardi-board lapped siding while the west façade will be faced with stucco to match the Hartman House. The windows will be of four over one and three over one design. Unit C has many decorative features which distinguish it from the historic building including aluminum shutters and decorative window sills, balconies with decorative brackets, decorative wood accent trusses, and exposed rafter tails. The hardi-plank walls will be painted Gaucho Brown, the stucco walls will be Greenbrier Beige, the shutters will be Shadow Gray and the doors and windows will be Mahogany stain. Internally, the first 7 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 18, 2005 floor of Unit A comprises a bedroom, laundry and a two-car garage. The second story contains a living room, dining room, kitchen, pantry, and powder room. The third floor contains two bedrooms. Unit C (north side of property) will be a new two-story of similar construction to the new three-story dwelling. The first floor will contain two bedrooms with en-suite facilities, a game room, and a single-car garage. The second story will contain a living/dining room, a kitchen, and a bedroom with en-suite facilities. There will be a central courtyard to the three units which will contain a swimming pool and spa. On the exterior of the rear garage wall joining Units B and C will be a decorative cascade fountain. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation states that: New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. Design Guidelines Locate an addition as inconspicuously as possible, usually to the rear or least public side of a building. In a historic district, consider the surrounding buildings and the compatibility of the addition in terms of size, scale, materials, mass and roof form. Do not introduce a new architectural style, or too closely mimic the style of the existing building. Additions should be simply and cleanly designed and NOT attempt to replicate the original design. Insure that the addition is secondary and subordinate to the main mass of the historic building. Additions that overwhelm the original building are not an acceptable solution. Analysis: The development proposal involves the restoration of the historic Hartman House and the construction of two new dwellings to form a townhouse development. The restoration of the Hartman House will consist of mainly appropriate repairs which should be encouraged as the building will be put to an appropriate and sustainable use which will ensure its ongoing maintenance and repair. It is also accepted, that to make a development proposal viable, it may be necessary to extend a historic structure. In this case, the historic structure will be extended to the north by a two-story addition including a two-car garage on the first story and a bedroom on the second story. The addition and the attached new two-story structure conform to the LDRs in terms of height, proportion of openings, relationship of materials, texture and color, and scale; however, as the extension is to the side of the historic structure, it is visible from the public right-of-way (NE 7th Avenue). A distinction between the historic structure and the new construction has been made by the use of differing materials and the addition of architectural ornamentation. However, this distinction could be made even clearer if the bedroom over 8 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 18, 2005 the double garage was removed and the roof height lowered so the profile of the Hartman House roof was not interrupted. If removal of the bedroom affects the viability of the proposal, an attempt should be made to reduce the height of the roof. Consideration should also be given to increasing the front setback of the new two-story dwelling to further set it apart from the historic structure. Except for the changes recommended above, new two and three-story dwellings are also appropriate with regard to the LDRs, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and the Design Guidelines. The two new dwellings are of a traditional design yet complement the historic dwelling through the use of similar detailing such as window design. The use of different materials and a move away from the symmetrical appearance of the Hartman house; however, allow them to be differentiated from the historic dwelling. Neither new dwelling dominates the historic structure and, as can be seen from the color rendering, the Hartman House stands out because of its simplicity in color and lack of ornamentation, and its symmetrical design. With regard to the new three-story building, although it projects above the roofline of the Hartman House, it does not dominate the historic structure. The proposal includes the demolition of the swimming pool which was built in 1962, and the garage, neither of which appear to have any historic significance. The development proposal involves the restoration of the historic Hartman House and the construction of two new dwellings to form a residential townhouse development. The restoration of the Hartman House will ensure the historic structure is put to an appropriate and viable use which will ensure its ongoing repair and maintenance. The proposal, once the attached conditions have been addressed, will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will meet the criteria set forth in Sections 3.1 and 2.4.5(F)(5) of the LDRs, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and the Design Guidelines. Mr. George Brewer, Architect, advised he faced many challenges regarding plans for this house. He wanted to be respectful of the historic house without competing with it. A rendering was submitted to Mr. Adams a few weeks ago. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing. Board discussion ensued regarding the following items: Site Plan Item No. 5. regarding a physical connection with a common fire-rated wall between Unit A and Unit B. Design Elements Item No. 2. regarding setback of the extension and Unit C increased. 9 ' Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 18, 2005 Item No. 3. regarding the doorway from the first floor bedroom to the laundry is blocked up and the entrance to the laundry is gained via the Florida Room. Mr. Adams advised he was not concerned about the fire wall. Michael Weiner, Esquire, representing Mr. Brewer advised that the definition of a building is to protect or shelter for any occupancy. We have provided space which gives protection or shelter. Therefore, this is two stories and one building under the code. Mr. Shutt advised if they are asking for a variance we would have to notify the public and you would have to come back to the Board. Mr. Adams advised he is happy with the design as long as we can tie it into the LDR's. Board discussion ensued regarding improving the alley. Mr. Brewer advised they are improving the alleys, however, he would like the barriers removed. Chairman Perez agreed that the barriers should be removed as it will benefit the project. Site Plan It was moved by Ms. Dersh, seconded by Ms. Schatz. and passed 4 to 0 to move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan and design elements for 302 NE 7th Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: 1) That revised plans be submitted addressing the technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report. 2) That a five foot (5') right-of-way dedication is made for NE 7th Avenue prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) That a two foot (2') right-of-way dedication is made for both alleys prior to issuance of a building permit. 4) That a plat for the development proposal is submitted and the type of ownership is indicated. 5) That two (2) off-street parking spaces on NE 3`d Street are added. Design Elements It was moved by Ms. Dersh, seconded by Ms. Schatz, and passed 4 to 0 to move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness and the associated design elements for 302 NE 7th Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report 10 • Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 18, 2005 and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, and the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, subject to the following conditions: 1) That the roof height of the extension to the north façade of the Hartman house is modified by lowering the fascia, and adding a dormer. This will be approved administratively. 2) That the doorway from the first floor bedroom to the laundry in the Hartman House is blocked up and entrance to the laundry is gained via the Florida room. 3) The following colors submitted on the rendering submitted at the Board Meeting will be used: Benjamin Moore gaucho brown (2096-40), shadow gray (2125-40), greenbrier beige (HC-79), sea froth (2107-60), and distant gray (2124-70). IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments: B. Report from Historic District Representatives: None C. Board Members: Ms. Dersh inquired if we are allowed to discuss the fact that an applicant a few weeks ago wanted a house designated historic, so that they could come back and get variances from the Historic Preservation Board instead of the Board of Adjustment. Mr. Shutt advised if it meets the criteria and the Board approves it and the designation is supported then someone can do that. It is difficult to get a variance from the Board of Adjustment. Ms. Schatz advised when we were talking about modifying the boundaries for historic preservation and people were complaining there were too many issues involved. If somebody is designating their property and just because they come to us for a variance doesn't mean we have to give it to them. Chairman Perez advised they could tear a house down and build something from scratch that matches other houses. The applicant decided not to do that and now we have something interesting looking. Ms. Reich inquired if a building is restored, then how do they build an addition that does not have historic qualities. Chairman Perez advised when you replace elements on a historic house they have to be replaced in kind. Mr. Adams advised if you buy a non-conforming building you can spend 10% on internal repairs and 15% on external repairs. There is a limit on spending to repair the home. If it is historic more money can go into the historic building. You can make the building historic because you can obtain certain waivers. Once it is historic it has to come to the Board for approvals. 11 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 18, 2005 D. Staff: Mr. Adams advised that a first application to install Armor Screen on a house will come before the Board at the next meeting. This screen can be rolled up for storage. The advantage of this screen is that is easier to store, lighter in weight, the panels are removable, and the tracks on the building are a lot less noticeable. These individuals will be required to bring in samples for the Board to see. Shutters can be approved administratively. VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Board made a motion to adjourn at 7:30 p.m. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for May 18, 2005 and was formally adopted and approved by the Board on June 1,2005. A72/,,,z, a, 7 4 enise A. Valek If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. 12 �,t sueAGENDA = HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH 'rq y .tbsP Meeting Date: May 18, 2005 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: City Commission Chambers Time: 6:00 P.M. The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Randolph at 243-7127(voice), or 243-7199(TDD), 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing, such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Two or more City Commissioners may be in attendance. I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • April 20, 2005 III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. 1109 Seaspray Avenue (The Price House), Individually listed, John Papera Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of aluminum-framed, impact resistant windows. B. 302 NE 7th Avenue (Hartman Townhomes), Individually listed, George Brewer, Agent Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated demolition request, Class V site plan, landscape plan and design elements for the construction of a townhouse development. IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS • Public Comments • Reports from Historic District Representatives • Board Members • Staff . V. ADJOURN Warren Adams, His oric Preservation Planner Posted on May 17,2005 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA MEETING DATE: April 20, 2005 LOCATION: City Commission Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Francisco Perez-Azua, Maura Dersh, Jeffrey Silberstein, and Michelle Reich MEMBERS ABSENT: John Miller, Jr., and Linda Lake STAFF PRESENT: Warren Adams, Brian Shutt, and Denise Valek I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Perez at 6:00 p.m. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. No one from the Public addressed the Board on non-agenda items. Chairman Perez read a summary of the Quasi-Judicial Hearing procedures. The Notary swore in individuals for testimony. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Mr. Silberstein, seconded by Ms. Dersh, and passed 5 to 0 to approve the Minutes of April 6, 2005 as written. III. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS A. 220 NW 2'd Street, West Settlers Historic District, Dennis Thompson, Agent Item Before the Board: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the replacement of existing windows and the installation of storm protection. (Quasi- Judicial Hearing). Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. Mr. Adams entered the project file into the record. The subject property consists of the west 75' of Lot 1 and the west 75' of the north 23.5' of Lot 2, Block 43, Town of Delray, and is located on the southeast corner of Martin Luther King Jr. Drive (NW 2"d Street) and NW 3rd Avenue. The 1,766 square foot single family dwelling was built in 1948 in the Minimal Traditional style and is of wood frame construction with vinyl siding. The structure is considered a contributing building within the West Settlers Historic District and is currently zoned Single Family Residential (R-1-A). There are no recent administrative or Board actions pertaining to this property. Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 20, 2005 The current proposal is for the replacement of existing aluminum framed awning windows with 6 over 6, single hung aluminum framed windows and the installation of removable hurricane panels. The following is suggested by the Delray Beach Design Guidelines regarding: Windows: Design and install new windows when the historic windows are completely missing. Changing the historic appearance through inappropriate design materials or adding a finish or color that changes the sash, depth of reveal, the reflectivity, or the appearance of the frame should be avoided. Replacing viable windows rather than maintaining the original should be avoided. Shutters: Window shutters that are removable are preferred. If the tracks are to be installed year-round, they should be painted to match the exterior surface. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation suggest the following: The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. The proposed replacement windows and storm protection are part of an overall repair scheme of the building which is being jointly funded by the City of Delray Beach and the Community Redevelopment Agency. The applicant proposes the replacement of all the windows in the house except the ground floor windows on the front façade as they were replaced a number of years ago. A COA application for their replacement could not be found. The existing aluminum framed awning windows are not the original windows and their design is inappropriate for this style of building.While there is no evidence to show the design of the original windows, the proposed 6 over 6 single hung windows are in keeping with this style of dwelling and period of construction. Although wood is the most appropriate material for the proposed windows, the installation of aluminum frame windows can be supported as the original windows do not exist on the building and the installation of a more appropriate design will improve the appearance of the dwelling. It is essential that the depth and profile of the muntins are consistent with the profile that is normally provided with a wood framed window, therefore, a condition of approval is that a muntin profile is submitted which provides the appropriate depth and profile. 3 Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 20, 2005 The applicant has not stated the proposed color of the new window frames or whether clear glass is to be used. A further condition of approval is that clear glass is installed in the windows. Although the tripartite windows on the ground floor of the front façade were replaced in the past and are in good condition, the applicant should consider replacing the central sections with 6 over 6 single hung aluminum frame windows and the four sidelight windows with casement windows of an appropriate design. The installation of the proposed removable storm panels can be supported as they are the least obtrusive form of storm protection and conform to the recommendations of the Design Guidelines. As the tracks require minimal hardware, there is little concern that the installation could irreparably damage the exterior of the building. However, in order to camouflage the tracks, a condition of approval has been added to paint the tracks to match the color of the building. Based on the analysis above, positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8)(c) and (g), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation can be made, subject to the above conditions. Mr. Adams advised the applicant is not present, and he did not bring the window in for review. Mr. Silberstein advised he agrees with staffs recommendation. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing. It was moved by Ms. Dersh, seconded by Ms. Schatz, and passed 5 to 0 to move approval of the COA for 220 NW 2"d Street by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and (c) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: 1. That a muntin profile is submitted which provides the appropriate depth and profile that is provided with a wood framed window. 2. That clear glass is installed in the windows. 3. That the tracks for the removable storm panels are painted to match the color of the building. B. 238-240 NE 5 Terrace Del-Ida Park Historic District, Tullia Taylor Item Before the Board: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the replacement of existing windows (Quasi-Judicial Hearing). 4 Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 20, 2005 Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. Mr. Adams entered the project file into the record. The subject property consists of Lot 14, Block 9, Del-Ida Park, and is located on the southwest corner of NE 5th Terrace and NE 3`d Avenue. The 1,404 square foot duplex was built in 1954 in the Masonry Vernacular style and is of CBS construction. The structure is situated within the Del- Ida Park Historic District and is currently zoned Low Density Residential (RL). The building is currently classed as non-contributing; however, the 1991 survey states: "This building is associated with the developmental history and exhibits the architectural elements of the Del-Ida Park area during the 1950's. Due to its historical and architectural significance, this building could contribute to the locally listed Del-Ida Park Historic District when the historic district is re-evaluated and the period of significance is expanded to include later historic resources". There are no recent administrative or Board actions pertaining to this property. The current proposal is for the replacement of the existing jalousie windows with 1 over 1 single hung aluminum framed windows with impact resistant glass. The following is suggested by the Delray Beach Design Guidelines regarding: Windows: Retain distinctive windows which feature a sash, muntins, glazing, sills, heads, hood molds, paneled, or decorative doors jambs and moldings and shutters and blinds. Changing the historic appearance through inappropriate design materials or adding a finish or color that changes the sash, depth of reveal, the reflectivity, or the appearance of the frame should be avoided. Replacing viable windows rather than maintaining the original should be avoided. Shutters: Shutters should be operable or appear to be operable. "Shutter dog" hardware should be used to enhance the appearance that the shutters are operable. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation suggest the following: The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Repairing the existing jalousie windows or replacing them with an identical design would be the most appropriate methods for repairing this building according to the LDRs, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. The applicant has stated, however, that the current windows are in very poor condition with broken mechanisms and allow the penetration of water. The applicant has chosen not to install new jalousie windows as there is concern over the security and storm protection they provide and their lack of energy efficiency. The proposed 1 over 1 single hung aluminum windows have frames with a 5 Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 20, 2005 depth of approximately 2.75" and are in keeping with this style of dwelling and period of construction. Also, when using impact resistant glass, the building code does not require the installation of hurricane shutters. The applicant has not stated the proposed color of the frames which are available in white, bronze or an anodized finish. The glass is available in clear, grey or bronze tint and a condition of approval is that clear glass is installed. The replacement windows are part of an overall repair scheme for the building which includes roof repairs, the upgrading of services and the installation of air conditioning which will allow the currently vacant duplex to become occupied. The building retains most of its original wooden shutters and shutter dogs, and, although the installation of impact resistant glass means they are not required for storm protection, it is a condition of approval that they are retained and repaired or replaced as necessary as they contribute to the building's character. Where the original shutters and dogs are beyond repair or are missing, they should be replaced with shutters and dogs of an identical design and material. There are two Bermuda shutters to the front of the duplex. It is recommended that these are replaced with shutters of the original design and material. Based on the analysis above, positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8)(c) and (g), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation can be made. Ms. Tullia Taylor, applicant, 238-240 NE 5th Terrace, Delray Beach, advised when she acquired the property she was going to tear it down, however, she decided to restore it. Her concern is that when she acquired the property there was an empty lot behind it, and how she wants to build another house behind it. However, the City does not support this. They would prefer I tear down the house and build two single-family homes. This would be a hardship on me. I will need a waiver to build another home, and will be coming before the Board for this waiver. If it is not approved I will be forced to tear it down or sell it. I would like direction from the Board. Mr. Adams advised that the applicant purchased two properties, one has the duplex on it and the property adjacent is vacant. He advised Section 4.4.1(C) except for single family residences subject to the R-1-A (Single Family Residential) zoning district standards, if two (2) or more adjoining lots (or combination of lots and portions of lots) of record were under the same ownership as of October 18, 1994, and if the total frontage and the total area is equal to or greater than that which is required by the zoning district regulations, said property shall not be developed except in accordance with the minimum frontage and lot area requirements of the district. Ownership shall be determined by the property tax rolls on file in the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser's Office as of October 18, 1994. When Ms. Taylor came before us with an application to demolish the building, we could not accept it. Now that she wants to redesign the duplex the lot is not large enough. A waiver would be required to construct a single family home on the lot; however, staff does not support that. 6 Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 20, 2005 Chairman Perez advised we are getting off the subject, and we should talk about this during the discussion item portion. Brian Shutt, Esquire, advised since we have not publicly noticed this, it is not appropriate to talk about something of this nature as they might be coming back to the Board in the future. It is a problem discussing what we will or will not do. This cannot be discussed as a discussion item. Chairman Perez advised the applicant to prepare a conceptual site plan and submit it to staff and it can be brought before the Board. Mr. Adams advised Ms. Taylor is concerned that she can't get insurance because of the roof and windows, and wants to carry out the repairs as soon as a possible. However, it is pointless if she has to demolish the building. Chairman Perez advised she has to submit the conceptual site plan. Mr. Adams advised the COA was submitted for the construction of one of the houses, but we did not want to put in a COA until the applicant decided what direction she was going in. Chairman Perez advised it can go to the Board at the next meeting as s discussion item. Brian Shutt, Esquire, advised it should come forward as a COA and not a discussion item. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing. It was moved by Ms. Reich, seconded by Mr. Silberstein, and approved 5 to 0 to move approval of the COA for 238-240 NE 5th Terrace by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and (c) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: 1) That clear glass is used in the windows; 2) That the wooden shutters and shutter dogs are retained and repaired where necessary; and, 3) That where the original shutters are beyond repair or are missing, they are replaced with shutters and shutter dogs of an identical design and material C. Lot 3 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District, Peter Dwyer, Agent Item Before the Board: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of a single family residence. 7 Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 20, 2005 Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. Mr. Adams entered the project file into the record. The property consists of Lot 3, Dixie Del-Ida Plat and is situated on the southeast side of Dixie Boulevard between Swinton Avenue and NE 2'd Avenue. The 0.24 acre property is presently vacant and is zoned Single Family Residential (R-1-AA). The lot is situated within the Del-Ida Park Historic District. At its meeting of June 2, 2004, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) reviewed and recommended approval to the City Commission of a request to re-plat Lots 2-5, Block 5, Del-Ida Park in order to accommodate the construction of three (3) new, single- family residences in addition to the retention of a contributing single family dwelling (four lots total). The HPB also recommended approval to the City Commission of waiver requests regarding the minimum lot dimension requirements for the lots proposed to be created via the aforementioned re-plat. Along with these recommendations, the HPB approved a demolition request for the aforementioned garage, and a variance for the reduction of the side interior setback from ten feet (10') to five feet (5')to allow the retention of the extant historic dwelling. The Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval of the Dixie Del-Ida Plat as well as the associated waivers at their meeting of June 21, 2004. Subsequently, at its meeting of July 6, 2004, the City Commission denied the request to re-plat Lots 2-5, Block 5, Del-Ida Park as well as the associated waivers regarding the minimum lot dimension requirements based upon a finding that the proposed lots were inconsistent with the surrounding development pattern and would adversely affect the neighborhood. At its meeting of October 6, 2004, the HPB recommended approval to the City Commission for an application to subdivide the non-conforming Lots 2-5, Block 5, Del- Ida Park into three (3) conforming lots while still retaining the extant historic dwelling. The City Commission approved the subdivision at its meeting of November 2, 2004. The applicant is now requesting approval for the construction of a single family residence on Lot 3 of the subdivision. The proposal is to construct a 3,178 square foot 2-story single family residence. The first floor living area contains 1,945 square feet and consists of a living/dining room, library, great room, kitchen, utility room, guest bedroom and cabana. Also on the ground floor are: a 140 square foot entrance porch, a 459 square foot double car garage, and a 208 square foot lanai. The second floor contains 1,233 square feet and contains a master bedroom with master bathroom, two further bedrooms, and a bathroom. The dwelling is designed in the Mediterranean Revival style and is of concrete block and stucco construction. The roof has multiple pitches with clay barrel tiles and no overhang at the eaves, and the windows and French doors are aluminum framed with impact resistant glass and 7/8" muntins. It appears as if there are a mixture of casement windows and sash windows in the building; however, no details have been submitted. 8 Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 20, 2005 The asymmetrical façade of the property faces to the northwest and is stepped back at a number of points, particularly at the second story level. The garage is to the front of the property but is set back behind a porte-cochere to lessen its impact on the façade. The-windows to the front façade are arched on the first story and rectangular on the second story with varying patterns of divided lights. The façade of the building has a number of ornamental details including an ornamental door casement consisting of two pre-cast stone Doric pilasters supporting an architrave, all of which are ornately detailed. The first floor windows have pre-cast surrounds while those on the second story have a smooth stucco surround. Above the first floor entrance is a balcony with a wrought iron handrail in the center of which is an ornamental metal medallion and supporting the facade arcade is a pre-cast spiral column with a Corinthian capital. There are also decorative lighting fixtures at either side of the porte-cochere (details attached), a circular louvered vent over the library window, and "sunbrella" awnings over three of the second story windows. The side elevations (southwest and northeast) are plainer in appearance although the second story of the southwest elevation contains a Venetian window and the northeast elevation has a dummy chimney. The rear elevation is also relatively plain although there are 3 archways leading to the lanai, a "sunbrella" awning over one of the second story windows, and a large tri-partite window on each story. The body of the house will be white in color and the barrel tile roof of the house will be terracotta. The front and garage doors and the window frames will be stained dark brown, and the "sunbrella" awnings will be green and white stripes. The front and rear yards will be landscaped with the front walkway to the house comprising of brick pavers. No details of the type or color of pavers has been submitted. A swimming pool measuring 30' x 15' is proposed for the rear yard; however the location of the pool equipment has not been indicated. This must be shown on the plans. A 4.5' high Ficus Hedge and a pool fence will enclose the rear yard with access from the front being through two 4.5' high wooden gates at either side of the dwelling. The gate to the southwest is attached to block and stucco gate piers with the one adjoining the garage curving up in height from 4.5'to 6.9' The proposal also includes associated landscaping for the new development. A number of existing trees have to be removed from the site including a Norfolk Pine, two Sabal Palms, a dead Citrus Tree, and a number of Oaks. Existing trees and new trees are included in the proposed landscape plan. The trees comprise of 1 Gumbo Limbo, 1 Clustering Fishtail Palm, 2 Coconut Palms, 1 East Palatka, 1 Frangipani Tree, 1 Live Oak, 1 Purple Glory Tree, and 4 Montgomery Palms. A number of shrubs, groundcovers and accents are also proposed, and these include Cocoplum, Ficus Hedge, Dwarf Firebush, Pink Ixora, Dwarf Date Palm, Indian Hawthorn, and Cat Palm. The proposed two-story single family dwelling is designed in the Mediterranean Revival style and reflects a traditional style of architecture found within the Del-Ida Park Historic District. The design includes many features associated with the Mediterranean Revival style including cast stone ornament around the façade doorway and windows, an arcade, and a porte-cochere yet it can be recognized as a modern building through the use of modern materials. 9 Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 20, 2005 However, there are some concerns with regard to the structure's height, front facade proportion, and the scale of the building. Concerns over these issues have also been raised by owners of neighboring properties who have submitted letters (copy attached) stating their objections to the proposal. As indicated in the table below, within this section of Dixie Boulevard, the majority of the dwellings are small, single story structures with floor areas ranging from 664 square feet to 2,381 square feet. The proposed dwelling will have two stories, a frontage of 55', and a total floor area of 3,178 square feet making it the largest structure in this section of Del-Ida Park. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(a), the height of proposed buildings shall be visually compatible in comparison or relation to the height of existing structures and buildings. The proposed 2-story dwelling will be 25.5' high while the majority of the other dwellings in Del-Ida Park are single story dwellings. Furthermore, LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(b) states that the front facade of each building or structure, shall be visually compatible with and in direct relationship to the height of the front elevation of other adjacent or adjoining buildings within a historic district. The adjacent properties (106 and 118) are both one story and have a frontage of 24' and 34' respectively compared with the proposed 55'frontage of the proposed dwelling. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(j), the size of a building, the building mass in relation to open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, and porches shall be visually compatible with the building size and building mass of historic sites, buildings and structures within a historic district. The proposed building is greater in size and mass than the adjacent buildings and the majority of the buildings in the Del-Ida Park Historic District. However, there are two existing two story dwellings at 125 Dixie Boulevard (1928, Mediterranean Revival, contributing), and 515 North Swinton Avenue (1925, Mediterranean Revival, contributing). The two story dwelling at 125 Dixie Boulevard has a total of 1,748 square feet and a frontage of 38', and 515 North Swinton Avenue, has a total floor area of 2,289 square feet and a frontage of 36'. Ms. Kim Dwyer, owner of the property, advised when she first met with the Historic Preservation Board her proposal was for four (4) lots. She went in front of the City Commission and requested smaller lots and smaller coverage. City Commission denied this request. We went back to the Planning and Zoning Department and they wanted three large lots with larger frontages. This was approved by the HPB. We designed a 3,100 sq. ft. home. We are here to request building two homes in Seagate. In regard to the comments on the height of the home, we stepped back the front of the house. The porte-cochere is of the same style as the house, the garage is on the back of the property, and all of the setbacks have been met. There are structures of this size throughout the Del-Ida Park community, and there are commercial buildings as well. I understand people would like to see 1,000 square foot cottages; however, we have gotten a lot of pressure to build larger homes in this area. The only way to reduce the height of the house is to have 8 foot ceilings. We have taken into consideration the height of the buildings around us. We tried to design something in keeping with the character of the community. We are requesting your approval. Mr. Adams advised it is a very nice house. The Design Guidelines state that it should be compatible with the existing houses. The overall consensus is the house would not fit in with the rest of the homes on Dixie Boulevard. 10 Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 20, 2005 Chairman Perez advised it is a nicely designed house, it does step back on the second floor, and it is broken up very well. Ms. Dersh as well as Mr. Silberstein concurred that it was a nice design. Mr. Silberstein advised if there is concern about the scale, perhaps the gable on the side could be a hip to bring the mass down. Ms. Schatz advised that she likes the design of the house, and to build a smaller house is unrealistic as this house is not that large. Mr. Adams wanted to insure that the Technical Comments as listed in the staff report are complied with prior to obtaining a building permit. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing. It was moved by Mr. Silberstein, seconded by Ms. Schatz, and passed 5 to 0 to move approval of the COA for Lot 3 Del-Ida Plat by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(H), 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), and 4.6.16(H)(1)(a-g) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to conditions, subject to the following conditions: 1) That the proposed chimney be either removed or relocated to comply with the building setback requirements. 2) That the gable be changed on the side elevation to hip. 3) That the Technical Items are met. Motion amended by Mr. Silberstein, seconded by Ms. Schatz, and passed 5 to 0 to change condition no. 3 to read: That the side elevations of the gable ends be changed to hip. D. House of Vintage, 123 South Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Jeffrey Silberstein, Architect, Agent Item Before the Board: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class V site plan, landscape plan, design elements, and a waiver request for a residential extension to a commercial property. Mr. Silberstein stepped down. Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. 11 Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 20, 2005 Mr. Adams entered the project file into the record. The subject property consists of Lot 3, Block 70 of the Sundy and Cromer Amended Plat. The 1,347 sq. ft. Masonry Vernacular structure was constructed in 1947 as a residence and displays a cross gable shingle roof and varying fenestration including metal casement, jalousie and awning windows. The building is designated historic and is considered a contributing building in the Old School Square Historic District. The property is zoned Old School Square Historic District (OSSHAD) and is used as a commercial premises. At its meeting of January 15, 2003, the HPB approved, with conditions, the conversion of the single family dwelling to office, the construction of a four (4) space asphalt parking lot to the rear (east) of the property and the creation of one parking space to the front (west), the installation of a handicapped accessible ramp, demolition of a 96 sq. ft. non-contributing wood frame shed, and the installation of landscaping. Approval was also given for waiver requests to allow parking in front of the historic building and a waiver to reduce the landscape strips on the north side from five feet (5') to four feet (4') and on the south side from five feet (5') to three and a half feet (3.5'). A variance request was also approved to allow a back-out parking space onto Swinton Avenue; provided that the space is designated for employee parking and that signage is provided directing patrons to the rear parking area. During its meeting of September 17, 2003, the Board reviewed and approved a Class II Site Plan Modification for the conversion from office to retail. On September 22, 2003, the applicant was cited by Delray Beach Code Enforcement for the removal of the original divided light, steel casement windows and the installation of 6/6 aluminum frame windows related to the elevation changes from the Class V Site Plan approval. The applicant was notified that the windows were inappropriate and that they must submit a COA for the installation of new divided light, casement windows. On January 7, 2004, HPB approval was granted, subject to conditions, for the installation of a free- standing sign, an under canopy sign, casement windows, and storm panels. A Class IV Site Plan Modification has been submitted for the addition of a 3 story residential addition to the rear of the extant historic structure. The development proposal includes the following: • Construction of a 1,882 sq. ft. 3 story residential addition to the rear of the building and demolition of the existing single-loaded four(4) space parking lot; • Construction of a four (4) space back-out parking lot on to the alley including one handicapped accessible space; and, • Installation of associated landscaping and relocation of the trash receptacles to the south side of the building. The development proposal involves the addition of a 1,882 square foot residential unit to a contributing historic building currently in a commercial use. The proposed waiver to reduce the perimeter landscape strip at the north end of the parking lot can be supported in order to accommodate the width of the parking spaces. With respect to the design of the proposed addition, however, the applicant is attempting to introduce a new architectural style to the extant historic building and this section of the OSSHAD. The proposed extension fails to comply with the majority of the design requirements set out in the LDRs and the Design Guidelines and therefore is not consistent with Section 3.1.1 and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development 12 Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 20, 2005 Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. As the recommendation to provide a two-story structure will most likely impact the site design somewhat, the item should be postponed with direction. Mr. Jeffrey Silberstein, A.I.A., Jeffrey Silberstein Architect & Assoc. Inc., 524 NE 2nd Street, Delray Beach, advised he was in agreement with the first ten (10) Technical Items listed in the Staff Report. However, in regard to No. 11, and the design of the building, please read the article that you just received. There are also three (3) items noted in the Delray Beach Book regarding new additions for historic buildings. 1. The building should be diversified so existing are clearly of two different designs yet complimentary. It is always difficult as to what is complimentary when you are doing an addition to a contributing or historic building. The intent was not to emulate the existing cottage but to make a clear distinction. The reason the west elevation is left plain is because you don't want you eyes going toward that building. It is set back 75 feet from the street. You will never see it as a pedestrian walking on Swinton Avenue and you will not see the side elevations. 2. Locating the appendage at the rear. We did locate it to the rear and we tried to make it as inconspicuous as possible. The footprint is the same size as the house. 3. Additional levels should be setback and be placed as not to radically alter the historic appearance of the building. This was a deliberate design to do exactly that. The house stands on its own. If you do happen to see it from the street it will look like a new building that was build behind the house. We have approved many buildings behind this house on 1st Avenue that are going to be 35 feet or higher. I did not want to put a building there that looked like a big cottage. I wanted it to blend in with the cityscape. A sketch of the building was passed to the Board. The old building stands on its own, and the other one disappears. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Mr. Adams advised the_Guidelines also state with additions to historic properties located as inconspicuously as possible. I would suggest this means not making it higher than the extant existing building. Stepping back the upper story may help to minimize the difference. Warren Expand on this. The scale is larger, the building is higher, and the Guidelines do not introduce a new architectural style. Additions that overwhelm are not an acceptable solution. The LDRs are clear regarding the size of the building mass in relation to it being compatible with the building size and mass. In regard to the color blue, there is no guarantee that it will stay that color. Therefore, we are not adverse to the building being extended we would encourage the extension of the historic building so it can be retained. We feel it is inappropriate for this building in this section of the OSSHAD. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing. Ms. Dersh advised that the flat wall overpowers the building. The picture Mr. Silberstein gave us is a good example but you are talking half a story between the two. 13 Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 20, 2005 Mr. Silberstein advised the buildings are close to one and other. When you look up it blends in with the sky. We could do the building in the same color as the house. It could be all siding, but if the Board feels we should do it the same color we are OK with that. Ms. Schatz advised in looking at the picture the other part was not noticeable it blended in with the original building. How can you guarantee that the colors will stay the same. Regarding the Design Guidelines, it is confusing where it states "do not introduce a new architectural style to closely mimic the style of the existing building should be simple. I guess, if you are not supposed to make it look like what is there, but not supposed to introduce a new style. How do you achieve that goal? Mr. Adams advised you want it to be distinguishable and be appropriate and fit in. That could mean being one or two stories with a pitched roof. Chairman Perez advised the flat wall could be a problem. Mr. Silberstein advised he could provide another setback on the north facade. Chairman Perez was concerned with the height. You have to be somewhere in between regarding the style of the building. Ms. Dersh advised the addition is a full story taller. Mr. Silberstein advised the height could be reduced by two to three feet. Chairman Perez advised that aspects of the style enhance the original house; however, it is too high. If it was a two story building we would not have a problem. It was the Board's consensus that the building was too high. Chairman Perez asked Mr. Silberstein if the height could be reduced by three feet. Ms. Dersh advised the cable railing introduces a new style. Chairman Perez advised before a motion is made we need to make a decision whether we are going to accept this style or not. Chairman Perez asked Mr. Silberstein if he could to a contemporary style, but the height has to be reduced. Mr. Silberstein advised he would: 1) reduce the height, 2) break up the mass, an 3) the windows and doors will be vertical. Board discussion ensued relative to how the community will interpret this design, looking at alternatives, sloping the design of the roof, and bringing pictures of the surrounding homes to the next meeting. It was moved by Ms. Schatz, seconded by Ms. Dersh, and passed 4 to 0 (Mr. Silberstein stepped down)to table pending further information from the client regarding the following issues: 1. Reduce the scale 2. Offset the north elevation 3. Change the profile of the roof 4. Doors and windows should be vertical 14 Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 20, 2005 IV. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS A. Historic Preservation Poster Contest The following Posters were chosen from American Heritage School: Grand Prize: Tyler Ranew, 16354 Via Venetia West, 10th Grade Second Place: Elizabeth Seminano, 2952 NE 51st St., Margate, FL, 10th Grade Third Place: Catherine Dubin, 1125 Island Drive, 9th Grade V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments: Mr. Clemmer Mayhew, representing Mr. Michael Bogle, advised he would like approval for his client to remove the roof tiles and replace with shingles on a noncontributing building in the West Settlers area (circa 1972). Brian Shutt, Esquire, advised it should come before the Board as a Certificate of Appropriateness at the next meeting. Mr. Zara Wright, Wright Way Roofing advised that Mr. Bogle has already given him $8,000 to reroof with shingles, and all of the other homes in the area have shingle roofs. Chairman Perez advised he must submit an application and come before the Board on May 4, 2005. Mr. Clemmer Mayhew, mentioned that dates on the homes in the Del Ida Park area are incorrect. He also mentioned that duplexes are contributing if they are fifty years or older. Mr. Adams advised that any application for any alterations for the building cannot be disregarded whether it is fifty years old. Mr. Mayhew inquired if you have a building that was placed on a 50 foot lot and you have an adjacent 50' lot you are not allowed to build a separate building on that lot. I am concerned about 414(c). The cottage at 119 NE 10th Street was demolished. I feel what we are requesting is keeping in the tradition of the Historic Preservation Board and similar to what you were doing in Del Ida Park. We request that this be a discussion item at the next Board meeting. I have included the survey and a brief outline and some photos of the building. Brian Shutt, Esquire, advised if Mr. Mayhew was asking for direction it needs to come in as a Certificate of Appropriateness. These are Quasi Judicial hearings and anything that comes in front of the Board needs to come before the Board as a Certificate of Appropriateness. We will either table it or postpone it. Brian Shutt, Esquire, advised the Board cannot make a determination in regard to granting relief. Staff would have to look at that and advise if the Board could do that. 15 Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 20, 2005 Ms. Judith Green, 1160 Nassau Street, advised there are two attached units on the east side and west side. Code Enforcement has not done anything regarding these units. In March 2005 a request for demolition was submitted for two units. Two homeowners want to demolish the units and the other two homeowners are not in favor. One unit at 1190 has been vacant for several years. I am the only full-time resident. The other owners live out of State. I am concerned about the demolition rather than making repairs, as I would be living in a construction zone for over a year. Mr. Adams advised he received a Certificate of Appropriateness for demolition and a proposal for new duplexes. The letters you sent to demolish is because of poor construction, and the other two are lack of maintenance. It is difficult to tell what the situation is. There was a Homeowner Association Meeting and the vote was yes you can demolish these two units. The vote was not fair or valid. I have been reluctant to move forward. If they are allowed to demolish, we would need Engineering report and come before the Board for approval of demolition. Any approval would have to come from the Board as to what is proposed for the site. You would have to get legal advice we cannot give an opinion. B. Report from Historic District Representatives: None C. Board Members: D. Staff: VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Board made a motion to adjourn at 8:45 p.m. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for April 20, 2005 and was formally adopted and approved by the Board on Denise A. Valek If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. 16 4 DEIRAY BCACH DEIRAY BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD !Iy MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT J, 1993 199 1003 1001 1 Agent: John L. Papera Project Name: The Price House Project Location: 1109 Seaspray Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD. The item before the Board is consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of aluminum-framed, impact resistant windows at 1109 Seaspray Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H). BACKGROUND/PROJECT'.DESCRIPTION The "Price House", named for its original owners, was originally located at 526 North Ocean Boulevard. In 1998, the property was purchased for the development of five multi-million dollar homes that forced either the relocation or demolition of the dwelling. Rather than demolish the home, the owners, Steven Hayes and Patricia Okenica, moved the house and the two-story garage to its present location at 1109 Seaspray Avenue. The house was constructed in 1935 in the Monterrey style and designed by Delray Beach's first "city architect" Samuel Ogren. The property consists of Lot 11, Seaspray Estates, Delray Beach and is situated on the north side of Seaspray Avenue approximately 300 feet west of Andrews Avenue. The main block of the wood-frame house is two story and sheathed in clapboard. The property is zoned R-1-AAA. On March 3, 1998, the City Commission approved designating the property as an individually listed historic property due to its architectural significance. During its meeting on March 18, 1998, the HPB_approved a COA for the rehabilitation of the property including site preparation, mechanical upgrades, and general repairs related to the relocation of the building. The City Commission later granted an ad valorem tax exemption for those improvements in February 2000. The tax exemption extends from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2009. On May 2, 2001, the Historic Preservation Board reviewed and approved improvements to the property for the Sickle family, who purchased the property the same year. The proposed alterations included a two-story addition, new roof, balcony extension, replacement of an existing window with a door, relocation of rear windows, landscape plan, and related interior improvements. The Board approved the requested improvements with several conditions including that the three, modern, single light windows on the first floor, south facade (facing Sea Spray Avenue) be replaced with those that are more suitable for the period of construction. Permits were issued and the work was completed; however, this condition of approval was not met. As the Certificate of Occupancy was left pending, an application was submitted to the HPB to request reconsideration of the condition of approval to replace the modern windows with more appropriate windows. The application was denied and the applicant was instructed to Meeting Date: May 18,2005 Agenda Item: III.A. 1109 Seaspray Avenue—Installation of impact resistant windows Page 2 apply false muntins in a pattern deemed appropriate by the project architect and that the design was approved by staff. The current proposal is for the installation of aluminum single hung impact resistant windows. ANALYSIS=. LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(c), and (E)(8)(g) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The applicable standards are as follows: The Board Shall Consider: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(8) All improvements to buildings, structures, and appurtenances shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility shall be determined in terms of the following criteria: (c) Proportion of Openings (Windows and Doors): The openings of any building within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the openings exemplified by the prevailing historic architectural styles within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors to the height of windows and doors among buildings within the district shall be visually compatible. (g) Relationship of Materials, Texture, and Color: The relationship of materials, texture, and color of the facade of a building shall be visually compatible with the predominant materials used in the historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. The following is suggested by the Delray Beach Design Guidelines regarding: Windows Retain distinctive windows which feature a sash, muntins, glazing, sills, heads, hood molds, paneled, or decorative doors jambs and moldings and shutters and blinds. Changing the historic appearance through inappropriate design materials or adding a finish or color that changes the sash, depth of reveal, the reflectivity, or the appearance of the frame should be avoided. Replacing viable windows rather than maintaining the original should be avoided. Shutters Shutters should be operable or appear to be operable. "Shutter dog" hardware should be used to enhance the appearance that the shutters are operable. 1109 Seaspray Avenue—Installation of impact resistant windows Page 3 The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation suggest the following: The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Analysis The most appropriate method of storm protection for this property would be to use the existing wooden shutters or, if the shutters would not provide the required protection, to install removable hurricane panels. The applicant; however, has stated that around 2/3 of the windows were replaced with aluminum windows prior to him purchasing the property. No application for the installation of the existing impact resistant windows can be found; however, elevations from a 2001 application to alter the dwelling depict some aluminum-frame windows. The photographs submitted by the applicant indicate that the existing aluminum frame windows are designed to look like they are single hung but are actually casement windows. The applicant wishes to replace the remaining historic wood frame windows with aluminum-frame, single hung impact windows to fully protect the dwelling from hurricanes and to give the dwelling a consistent appearance throughout. However, the applicant has not been clear as to where on the dwelling the windows he wishes to replace are situated. If he wishes to install aluminum windows to the side or rear of the dwelling, and some of the windows to these elevations are aluminum, this could be supported. If; however, the applicant wishes to remove wood frame windows which are visible from the public right-of-way or from a façade which contains all wood windows, this, as in similar applications, could not be supported. The three, modern, single light windows on the first floor of the south facade (facing Sea Spray Avenue) are still in existence and the applicant wishes to replace them with aluminum-frame, single hung windows. The removal of original materials from a historic building should be avoided unless the material has deteriorated beyond repair when it should be replaced with an identical material. In this case; however, 2/3 of the windows have already been replaced and the applicant wishes to replace the remainder for increased protection and to give the historic dwelling -a uniform appearance. As part of this proposal, the applicant will also be removing the three inappropriate modern windows which do not open from the south façade and replacing them with functioning windows of a more appropriate design. The installation of aluminum frame, single-hung windows with a similar muntin profile to the historic windows on a facade with existing aluminum frame windows can be supported if the windows are not visible from the public right-of-way. For windows visible from the public right-of-way, the frames should be manufactured from wood and be given a similar muntin profile to the original windows. It is also recommended that the applicant replace any aluminum frame or casement windows which are visible from the public right-of-way with wood frame single hung windows. A further condition of approval is that clear glass is used in the windows. It is noted that the building retains many of its original wooden shutters and shutter dogs. Although the installation of impact resistant glass means they will not be required for storm protection, it is a condition of approval that they are retained and repaired or replaced as necessary as they contribute to the building's character. Where the original shutters and dogs are beyond repair or are missing, they should be replaced with shutters and dogs of an identical design and material. 1109 Seaspray Avenue—Installation of impact resistant windows Page 4 Based on the analysis above, positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8)(c) and (g), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation can be made. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the COA for 1109 Seaspray Avenue by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and (c) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to conditions. C. Deny approval of the COA for 1109 Seaspray Avenue by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and (c) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. RECOMMENDATION Move approval of the COA for 1109 Seaspray Avenue by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and (c) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: 1) That any impact windows installed within view from the public right-of-way have wood frames and muntin profiles to match the historic windows. 2) That clear glass is used in the windows; 3) That the wooden shutters and shutter dogs are retained and repaired where necessary; and, 4) That where the original shutters are beyond repair or are missing, they are replaced with shutters and shutter dogs of an identical design and material. Attachments:Location map,photographs Report Prepared by:Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner /A: r 1 "`�^^^1111 t1''-) 1 MCKEE LN. 1 I I t I PEI IC L AN ANE SOU TH- QI 11 I i I < 1 I j HAMPTON to I I 1 I Q o I BRIDGE— _ WATERWAY FORTH CONDO z o HAMPTON °' r BOULEVARD a0 - INLET w a COVE CONDO I I I w 1 gOsµ 1 I I Q cEoR I I I c� I � SAINT F ( � souTHWAYs VINCENT'S MFR¢F� THE � I I C CHURCH 0� >- If LANDINGS 1 I I I I `i CONDO CRESTWOOD DRIB WEDGE- i 1 WOOD CONDO ifY a • W HAMMOND RD j M.S.A. Mr.S.A. TRACT I > TRACT I w • a < -J i 3 D i I W I o N.E. oTH ST. I HAR O I I II DRIVE I < `!ARBOR 1 CT.I 11 I I I i l • / / • � Ii N.E. 5TH ST. J z I ! Z ISI AND DRIVEif 1 1 I I i Z o I I N.E. 4TH ST. U BEACH DRIVE ti i I I j � I I i - I I I` — SEA SPRAY AVE. Z l I 1 I 1 1 i I I I I I 1( . I i t I ii t I I ` ANDON�AY LIAN= 1 t( Si Ir I t O WATERWAY LANE IM u I 1 :I‹ i I o . I� i , I I Ip 1 t ! I 1¢ i I LAING ST. / r I � I 1 I � � i ! .=. 3RU T' \ I I I I l• II i I l j I I 1 I 1 I LIAF DR, - •• ' I i i 1 t 1 i i \ ! j VISTA DEL MAF, DRIur N PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1 109 SEASPRAY AVENUE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL -- DIGITAL FIA.CE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LM183 (J I • 11\\,, ` � � t 1 -,1 lid �... Sk' z " Y ` A U r y z'A i 5.! �_ ' r -X e '41 g y., , u3 �z. ,T 'T. s.: ''''....,,‘ ..--:,2,..,tros.t7.4‘,- 'i t'",'..--f 5:,--"t,-' zi.7.,---.4=-zisi.A.T,,,qa,_:.4-.-7 . , :i I _m.,4. y :: t. z� -- ,"s` 3 sue.‘ - --.F,_ 3+ `\{.e{, . . .,!,.,o mr . d.1 t ' LJ !7k i a p %. t` .�L 1 ,'.- . i!a"Y3'a{ +1^,y : ,,r' ,:.y 1 F, ,, ,. rt F .., yt}aS „. ,a, •�+r.,�,f i•. �- }r. �.. " C v �' Y � ,i x c7q. *fit+ a1 + �•. aFlu r f?` S f;+aze� • .nwum$ --, •,.' 5 ^ _-. 1 .": y, e' c }ri .fir f "p>�5,- \;�' e x v '3 -v 7y z4 "'� Al - -,.?- ":-', -tom' --Y- `; , ' '` :o-'.w .,• `„ xr.. -1 ; .,Fa" �==ate.',•` e. ,,... '" "--- '-s vie ,.�'t*st� ,k'¢ x _; .z- i�,y��,i - 114 d i,A# ` t 1. / .' , RJR rf'�7 rp/' jt±'r \ ' 4.R y i r r j Vick Jy �l\r�`dt Ir +ra � �r�rlr V:.,S��l ��A•ii _... f fy j ar>_'� t)t4 l,A1#10 4'�' ti ' t `"',..,- _ ''• `' ,�, ? 6. �� $,t Ii� yY+l,'r sr.1-� 7� ' 4 �' ~~ �...` +"arY -t i lf/'ft5>L4 ? Iv. f 44�.- f 2S i ' r "s IJ 1 se"' 4 } ..1 tf ae f i 1;775 1.,..,dr r,w .• k, �fi'M ``- -X ., S .41 i ry 7 , r y .' lt. f yy :.iof t..-v- ` 3. r �J'. fs'ii t55t a .. -, 1 ;` . s n.r k r �{ •t� yy "faa?.5e °a _ k t ''4'a+ 33 �.Z'`�' (a4.� z. r-`'` -" 't ryy �"^ "'�'.r„t �y�`'-` .,'r _ y ' '. �.. 'x' t�� :.1 /syft ; rf } �y\ye,� 2A eR C A 0-.X. 1 1',,��@p�,.fi6� 7: -Z- .r - p®j �', 4i-. ✓ `'Y$i3 .+' '3 s ?\E ".e k 1 l E 2 ",, I slf 9 '\ ESQVr - : r i Y� r 8'1" '•{ ':: -.s. ..,. r,� `r (t�+ V 1 :Si, �� '1 'fix » iigrig r. .. ::.f.' .4,,..-..•,, ,. _ r .,,�yi 4 C ' : e A �.,`• `f -ry•y l 1' - `h '�/ cro p_ xr . v. G 1? i!f ! a � y ' gr � � �rt '!� 11f z i A.i r ' r . n •,.W 1 �..,. • .. ` . w t ':T.'''''- " 5~ ,.+ a , / z. 1. . .- t .... ,Za 1 x. f -1 h I� ? arTS ti ^ `If:` uric , .-t3 .t, :,-, ,, s v { N L , 0 7 4 T r f 1 ▪ H X f •'-',..1.-..,-:_to.-4s •r•-••47--,;.."--.... . • „To./: ....,,-',..-.-------, ••••, 1 ,,, ,..,....,-.,:o.,,...zi.t.Z.,./... ---,- ::*.-144:1.-'e-i.":'-1-":.-''• Y -' '.,-. ; t,' ;,,f1i ,; i4 t! -.:...•-. - .. l ;‹ -. h , " i ' fi ) -.'..'...i..,,,'-. t.. rti,'::::,i4-,,,,,,,4.,,A.,-.-.,,,-,...:-. ,-)Ari41,--.1q."• ,-, .-:.,‘',:, _ , .-„, ., ..t ••, . , 1.,,,.,.1. 41.,,,-7,02E., .,• PNA. •,-,.- ..,:.i 0;1A/.-1.4!,...... .,;i:,.-;.,;,if.4'..!r ., _.....—.. -----. --;-,-:,*-7V1,-- '-•-,"-'- -S-Z,;.!7i. -4'v-, -.J.,..-•-•::-.•.-.,...,--cs:-..1.,--- -,(4 ;Y.4'::-,-",:::---k . .......- . ,,,, ,..... . . :,_.....,---,-,-,--,-----""' •.-\-z.,1--,-.-47;41,":"..,3';'-'''';"ii4i4---,r'...-'4:. .4-..-- ---i.\%;----:4..i'li-li,-'''..g,I L,0";::,... , ,, ,.,....., -•:"_._,,_.',,,,..,:_, ,,,,,•,..,,...•,;,-,.,,,,..,,,-,,,...-,:7: - ' ' ... . ; ...1,,,, ,•':.„,t.,,,:„;:k-!A„,-.Z.- ,,- •.•:/fr.,..,.:-4.-1:-4.r.:-. •,'..•,,•.-','./.454';'-‘::--,5-:;:- - .-.--,---- It,'a..,'-':.--:.'">----7- --::',;-:.‘.».."--- ..'":W11‘)-''''-I_I,. • -----; '-'17,7-7.4!,i):'4 ''..'1-,;',',...',4;','•'Y'. •..:',Wi.,,..T.:- . ).:'•".;•, . t.,...., it.,'::: .,-r •--'•.. - •-•:,-,-,..,..,:-.'''- :•,=•''-,-"C-,-,:-.::::,"'?. .":',":",'''.4,- , .,-*-+,,,,,.-..4-. 4--,.,r.,-_-:',,, -77 .._ :.,...,-.:„4-r4ilk ,.,,7:„.•,,,:p144.,:,,..74.-,.---,-,:H.---,,,..:,,,-.,;(.-.,..;i:;.#,:.......-,,i tk...,1•..,•:,,,,-, i:-.'',"...„.'-:.;;.---",:-;-.•'.-,-- .1-.! .:','?.:1-t'f.t.-7.-. .'.... .._,....:7-R4.------..:11f,- •:',!,'-''t1,2i..-1--..,...---,112r -..--;!•.'i' ---.----tir,A.1,.;!-'itc'-441,4;`.1-;:i.',:-.'.....:." .:.:if,iTO.l.4i.'•"-"'..• 1.-••!.,.--:i.f..;,',0.,1;',4•'&1;TfLZ.:.az';•:.;•,_',!,..!..Wii."1.:4ii..'.,--i--;:•:, . -.- ---,-.:,-.-.',....-21.,;:-,...z.,_- t,,,-::-,c;, ,.-4,14,4 .,. : .:4-,...,t.,••:.•--,:;, ;-7..--,:il .--.•, --.:.'.-;,4,:1:"-i,-A:k'.•,, ,,,,--..'-_--.7:ts-i'sA,,,,,Af.,.--x--;;;.•.,.,:5,-.----.--,----....,•.....,-,.....-•...-,•-.- .',.'.... -F.-.- -_-:,-,i,-;,-.-•::`...r:;1.,7..p4s.-.0-7,'...,,;' 434.T.--.:-,‘-.,:•-.: ••:,"•411::'..-i-•--,:--,--''i-.,' l'i.-1.'",',12,"","E.:::::-=','''s:„LIM24.-f].'- 'f':';-...•1:'-',:.,..:-.;:...-:" =';',:".:,-'5--,--,:;- -,' 1 '''''-I:' ':-ii114-:;U:r.-'-ii-':1' ' -tri--.'"..-',:sf'--1 t'-11' ',- .'; '',:.-,'N -A.•‘`,.::•• ••-Z.:•-,• :- .•,,..,_,-• - • l'...---.':!:•,:;-',;,- .....--;:---,..:.':fz-,.,.::::,-;),:ii..•,.4,-,,,i, .•,...t.. .-•:f6-.-,, ,, .i-,.,,•.1••_ i, •i-. ....-I,. ' ':,,,,...ry.-.:.:).?,,i,-,tkj.. ,,k.,,\;...i,;41),t,;,;,..,:,•,...%-1...,;;; ;-1,‘.s..,-:•,-,,,,:,‘_..---.:,:-..,..:,-.. , .....!...,.... -„Is'ii:-.:;f--..;,,,,,::,-,,,:,,•„,;-•.,.,..-...,,,,,,......• ,:-.,-:f„;-;,,,,,,,-,.-....,. .ti...:.......:•-, .-.Ai. ,ir -t.,., ;'.-•.'.. •r''';',-;:,.F1.11-,-,,,„.tzk.0_:7.fiat-?. -../1',:]•-! J'.- '''1„,•'-,- s-i, '- ,--; ''':.;',--,,I_.-T-L----','•''r'''''''-'-'"--'--- ",''''''.7"1V5q--. :'''''.7.,' -I .! 'Ir. 1V..,...'i''' .'",'.7., ' "•• 'Lit i''Oa'r.,..4,17,,I. , I.;.•,. .--, ..1.f.--4,_. ••.- :•••. .:-- i .. ;,. tt-t.,.•=i, .:---i., .1 I -•:,liti . -2- '--,";--1--------c - c I:''-":',;P:•--1:e•:4-7--I i 4 '1 i-"'---,"• '--fl•..-'.-'i---‘-''- •'-'''* 1..,.,,,,-,-...:'-...t.:....-1 0:•:.`7-4Wite.:.-;.• . /i:/:;.''''-'-i'v:,.'..--..•'..-• 4'. P, .,"i::-.:', .':'-';-,,...:-•;,;,:',.,--‘4..311. •,,..z.,,,....!-.1...,I}./..,(,-,,,, :i„,,,,,,.,..-.,-: . •' -'..4.- - - ;'pe74'. .-:-,7 I J •7••• ', --.-', •"--j • ':.1"" '::-.--••:1• • \Iititi''-'41'' 7$4:!--.'...' ':----'z-,'i.---•6"., :,:;._•''- :\- .(s- 1 I • • r.., ,,-.t.,!•,2!:::iA::--,,, •.!, : ,. - 1 ,_ ,, _i, .-.;J:„;t x: .;.._-_,,.5 .:.f 01,-40 :'-'--- .-I ' ::1 ;'': ! ;- .'- i . '';•, "/4.:'..Ikitg-4-4. AY?' ';:-II.':'-'-'s i ' '--4*--';: ,-- -----*-'-'-' .: : ;.. ' 5. , 1.2 .714' _.. - ' ,• '. -' . 't: ..rir.'!.,-.-..Vi. ;!4'' . ' -3-tit-ii.' ";:4' ••I ' ---,. ; ----...- .-. .,,-", :;--.:..,;:.-,‘ fi4'll ' . --:;`:- 1.1i71-Vi;•';:"1:::::,;>4,''',,•;.:".z-L",•:24----:".4:t2- --':-.•"'-',":;:`,':';';'if•--it::::',..-1„-z, :ITri,. .,..,,,•,..t.F.-1-,,,,,t,,.2,4!„,,,,,,,;.-,,,,...,..,:._,;.,.......,..1,,5,,. i,,,_, ,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,2 .,,,i;,,,,._..1.: 114,76.1475,.--ii,'". ..:•=-'-..',7,;i:5:Y..-ii,,,':',:.,-,--,J•..7...,A•7;:i'.:•,-,nriy-,.,.. '..-Tg.7..,•.$4.4'4,j,..%:;ii.,1,-,..4.,,r,_16,..,,T,,,„'i..:../..Y!7!•:..jA.,..,.„._.;-aStViiii*L,,,F,.f,!-..-1.-:. -,-,:,,,,,:-,..,. .k.d.....hirw.f.-5tAA•zi, f.,,. _ I, , : .., ,X4,,f4.,,;,,,,,,-..;',..,:,E.1,::..."::::',: i.:,:Ti'-:'i,:-'.;:,',".,,.:',=-•fFlif,:::,-21,';.',MT:,1-1.,-;"7-A.N,,j,,,g,ji , ',71;- .,;6.,11,-.'::::!ivicil.:i,i',:::.,Xtrk.'.,7*.;:'•ii.: ::•(,-).:V.:'i.,A,, ,•,-,4;.,_epirc4z4,,-4,,.4. i.i. - - • 31-4,t.:4-itriL:;',7,-,:-2- 7'.'.Tr.,.;,14:4-,4:4''-,'- '.t.1NFE,.,it.',t7.-:7 ;,-'.`.-- f.,'`,..,i- Vae,Vtitkrili,L,I....,,,(.:\',:f.'.',i`i.li:...'''''''.74MONE#M.:44algfr-r.•-i.. .3-r-fAili( STED'WATER;SjA,.---,,,_:•,,:l!.,,... 3,',.,-..-.A0..ti:N• f.1.-...7;..Si.ift,74,20,21,,.,./t.„7,-...c...,..,,,,,9e tgfill,,•%,6.:„.1•4'04Y-i';'.1.-::,!,- ,1"--,'"--'1--•''. -. , 4-=:... ' -- .-.1.-,--V;i::„P"-;*-.=::.,-J-7:::.;','"'-.-------,.''':: --''.'-',:•''': -.'-.;:'-i.',;_a-Z;;4.;-.7]:,A-',4E-."ki,...-',A, ,,,„,'410,..-N.,1-7-,.4.-t-!,'7'-4?"-;:..,"4..\\-i-'5,:tt..,,,ai ..,-44-.-.-;;.'.,t':,,,- .,-,- - 3. ..,..- • _.1.,•:,-„-„,.c-..0,..;;„,4„-,:..-,,,,,,.:;",1±-.- : -,-.--,,-..::',...,-.',.--%-,..",-",-..----,:,-.:,.-- -•-,---,y2,,,-.:,,"','„..,;_.-•,,•.:1, it.1/Tr4Ffi.4":7-141;/'-:!;4'..":"-ra..0,20,, ---'. -4: • .•- ..; :7'-74,-2'..-:-..;'..1 7.4 ----- .F'--f-,-;:l27":"--:-J-4-',--,7•:4, -{ ..,4. '"hi'Le',-it'ig4.,u;,./:--.4i; -•: 41 -' . - ,,,...- :-,, .4.t.i.,-..2.,--.,.-.,..- ...,. ,.,....,,,,.,..:-..,-.-,-!.. -. -","4,--7e.-4-.;:%-••40....1-71.-‘,-,.. -4,2,544:4,,44:,,,,-.--4,-i„ox.--„,.-gagit.T.t.,.,....,,....-,..0.-. • ) C , 'Li .--1 r) i'tn--0—(--....—• --`-'\ • . .••• .-,-.-:, -.-..---,,:.--„, _ - . , : .-- :•,• -,.. . . . ., . _ . . . - -,. ••.• •_ ,.• , -,,.-.... „ . - . . . . , . . .. . ,. ,._. . .,,: „,•. ... , . , , . , , .,.._......,.?,,,,..4%,,,.;:::-...-..:-q.--,-,,:,4::„:::;••-:-...,..-'-. •._, ---- --- i'','-'•f .:•-••• :-2,-..,.• .:-• :.-"-:- •,:--. ,.,,„.- .§PIT::.' ....*-1, -,.;4."4:4-10..f-,:-. --..:',17:7• ::-..:,-,''4-,,72.'-.... "i:•;-',.',. ,,-",,...-',,'1-,.:.•:-;•..,:,,'-. . - •'• ' ' • ' 1 • ' .1444 ' .7- I r.T.',.,..-7-',',,,,•-•::.•= '" : "- ' CT.:-.1".:- .. - .-..''.:':::,,47.";'''''.:::.:"-','-'-;:'.-'.. 1•ZtAtlf:.4'.':'.:;-:.':;l'::'' ''..!'i.'„ N...:;' 1'..,X:C.t•',.elk'f.'....''C'', ::::::.--''':' ''''''...;'.'"''...:...''' ...''.1.-.-• ' 'f,r;•-':''''i.".'',:=,•-',":"Y-;::::',-'-i•i.',";',-:':'..::;::.''',',.''. 7.44-;14,-`4":";':::-'-'.:*'",:2:4-,---. ----"--...`,. .•:-4 gi-P4':gf.' t:--r... ','._.•,-,--f.:.-.ii:-: ',';'„';':'••-••••.:"...'„•,-.'.--P;E-',V-';-f.l;i:c'-'''..;'-,.!.4:':4':,--:;A'-',, -.-,-:-":;-:.; .'.:,:':":"':.'' ..--',::.-', r''''',",,::, '..:',-:.-',.;--''..-,?,•"-Cii•i'''', ..?•••4;:•:,::i.....::-.,:',..'L'',',:;•••'•.';'-'::.':.,.';':::;',--:. ., ' .' • .- 5=41,A7-.--,:;',-..-'-,cf'. .1..-:',,,,•,-„.2.2,,k, -,. ---'-;'.1,--",:i7-,,'"'."..,',.:,..:;;;;;,,,,,.;:•.-,,...,-,::.---='.:.,,,',J-i41,1,,,.';-.,,,,,,',V-.;::,15.,i,...6.-&-..,,':',•„•,. .,.-•:;,: :,;:,.15,-:, ,.:,,,.--,- ".',:.1'.7,,F45;.„-.,;=",;:,5!.. ..,:-..-Y.:','•,;,,..:,..-,•,, ,,•-'----1-',"..-,•::'!:g`i,...-..-....-.7..,--.-:','•-• i. '..J:-.„,,-00„1...A.-,-- '1)...k*:44i4-t:.r;:'-r.:::'... .:,T-Ijtj'ali;'''-'--- - - -T""•.',-`•:- 44,----, -.."'-•'-:',"-' -tf',--;•-•:-"-, ,-*--,"-4----:-‘::';--j'":.:.',"-"';'-'---•-'r."-,-. ..-•tel„„,a-k--",',:-.',-"i#-i'''71'''it4V".4'''''''i.':''':. :,1%,-, 3'.,£,',,:. "..2,..+,71•-'',-,"-' ' 11,::L',":",.;:,,,•,;,'M,;,..-27,1 -,:•; :,,;:',: . •;....:',":•I-..'•'',..f':f''':.::‘.i::1;i;.;.1!...' 7-':.:4':'...':•''''.'''''''...N.',W?-,;;1745:1'.%,(1 r%:#!_';',:',:',.04,4.f.W;Prr;-,,,if'-':-. ,_ , • !',,: .,:::::,,,,,L',4-., ?;E:::::,:,:fi,',:,-,-,:,:::,±..:N'i:,-;,-.:::,-!1.1,,,,..--,,,...:..,--e.,.:.t ,-•-••• :-.t...--:.'---- .--- ;-:!!--•!...!.-.....-.-----.--:•-... .. L: f1T,,,,----,;;;A,V,..A.;:iv,,. ci, .i':,h7e-'::,,,',-;'-i.;,,--.:2-7.., ; ,,'".-rii-,,,,-",:•.--,.::.:.i:-,-,'"•:•,,',-.••'--,^F.,,:',%2-.7.:-.:-.4",:-.:.-:'; ..- ::=:..:-.=-----i----To."iizovi.4.41'.1,EaW4:'"At.4'''''"';`".:P iii',-.;;::':':-.. • ''. . . .. ,..:.;,..,,,g,•-•-,-,-.•,:i.;,f,::2:,....,,f',:,,r.'5--,,,,,:,,,. .,...,.-,,,,,7',-,,,', :--,-,t,-,..,7.q.ti-1 i'...,'.:..-..4.-:-2.-- t:if i-,1:0:,,,,,c,„-5,,, ,v.4.:.•:-..,:t•t?.4.7.,. .4.=.0.,4 :-. - .: . i,,.,.,. ...„..,,,,,,f.,..-,•,.,,.,,,,......,,,,,,,,:i.;:,.,:,,,,-•,•-.,--,.:.:-..::......:.,,•..-.......:.,.:,,.-.--..i.,.- ,,,.:„.0.,:,,,,:ie,-,. -....1...v ,-.-4,:,-,-.;-,1,-,..,'-'-'1'-,,-- '- - ' .,,,,,,,...--,::::: •,,,i-,-,,,--,,,,,,,,,,:-.,-.. :-:7':''''',''''`.. .-•''." ''--'''''..',..•1.f.id,e't '..":,-...4-41,, .4-‘i-- ',.,-,47f..”,.;4 ' ' fi.,.'tc f.:17',4 l'''A',3'4';‘1',W;jtl'2:',1'4'2'. : 3':i.,'',,;::,,....,'''''.':: :.f.;1:::'it';';L..'4:i:f.',....''',.-H I:'.-.f:•.-,A-1,,t1:__ -,,,,...,•„.:4,6,:___.i..*1.4,1-1,fo..._,:,•-,-- -• .,,,,_-_ -..„44*.v,,,,,,,,,,,,:::,•! •/,,. .:7,-.,:,-;:_,..-,,,,,:.;:-_-,.•••?„ii,,,,,..•.:.-4:,,,----.,,::-.1...'-7:: '.....1""C.','-'11-iilAtiFi.:$-;gelAIWt.^'-A ti•ii4'.;'''' ,:..--''''•''''''''.t`-;•;,^. 3..i',-.t7,14V;.,,,-",r,i,1,;',,,,,,','....::,,,...,,,,,,.':'.-' .:, ..."''.1'..-:':-4..-i,----,-,-4--: it-'41:.$14.0..-4,15';4•,;-51;.-.qt,--,--4,P.,;',7r,:,47,44-• -- .. • •.. t12---,„,-, ;..-..1...,---_ ,-,,,,,,,.,,.•:',...---••:.- ,,,,,,.f.-• .?.•--•i....•-•• r 1:,-...-1::::,•,.,••••ri .,4 io.,,,Ii:,4A'i,,N.F•zttia,,.--..rre.•,.,-.:,•,. : --,,,,,,,---,',,,,,,,,,,F,,,,?,,,v.....,..,,,,,,, ,,:.5,„'..,....'•"4.1-- -:',-----.1.--.-...,-.- - 1- 11-14;&..1.,..,.:-.mo,.134,4,v-----„4-:: -4,41.-014:?-4-`,,,--,4,,,,,,--4.,,,,,---- -'-'----il ti,'-',,:.-,-1;,"4-,",---"f;"-L"---"-:-.'::4-4',J---•!--:', -,------,-• :_;,"i.:4.---,----,..,',,t....'..- '' ,..:i1",:i,..',4•C'.....V'i''''',4-.,'CV.''..ttk.'",.,1----•*'-'''''`..- '''.-''..- '• . -7-, :' ''''i,4Lt--:1;:3'2,-7,!i''••;',„ :-.:7,::,:-,,,','"'••••:.•:' - Xt-gf;Z.:•.',:.11,.1-1;=:;'• 1 .if.ilei.-10-14 ,At..10',,1-2,-N14Tiow..24,,,,e,:41:..,. •-•::- •.: ,1-71 .1,',::',.=.--,-;:i:-:‘,3-,----•':----.-:'.-1.4- - -- g!.• i_ :qr1.17.-r,:'ZGfiz.:i7;i7eitifii.,1**-41711.1' :,...:,...,„;•1:,..,:-.:,,,,,:,-,: ,4m1.,,fr._,,, ,-, ...':,-,:i.. : .---••,nt-_:tai.,..A.-,,,,-,* • •i• pitr,,,,i%.:',:ff-34..4.14-1,• ;?,41,.et.,..,,.1,,..,-,7,..,-ept.,‘_,,e1:;-A:-., ,,,\,-,-;•,,,,,.„,. .,.,,,,r_:-.., •_ - • , •,,,-.4.t..1.::,,,,vettistl: I..: ,4,,,,,,,,::--i--_,:-.5:17.-:.,.,,,,,,,,,,,,:,•::•2:zitmeKotv,,,-_--,..,...31.-Ai.,..,..•. t',..',,:..?.....-•t., '-,:,-,•-•'..:.--,--.1 .-•,,,,c-..-.:,'..;•..... '..•--::t.---.$.4'4.--N-k.,-,?."?-:.- r illt.r4"-.& .47',4 --t-'41,-,417:tri4,,e1.,,„4,. .",,,i- ,4,5-0 :. -.t. --.'-''''.<- -..----..- -;,<-4 -,'-'?.:,•-.-:":4'_1.,4.•,----:?4---'3---;.4.:;31,7',,te-.J,=;.--".".-4--'..--.I ••-''',At-T "'''''.'''''''''''. f'-'!.--',"7.--*44*.tiVrf.."-iVI-INZ.-,".'' •-;•„":...-::---.,....,::„.„ •:.-4--?.."77..,:f--:-;', 4"-;:-.:',•;-..-"4.- ••••:::-!':...•:",-*-4.44,M;:r4- :.;::. .•---.-.' -- '- - '' 'r.I4-4.--.4r. :45.2z--tcf:,,!,f3--,..;:. - •-•-•„1,--,..., ! ,-„,--....:f.,,-.,---.- ':... .."."-:.::.-11;;•:::4';:-(i.;'i.'.::-••:' •'•;-'--,' .-,'..-'':::.. !-- ,----• - ' . •-,•.-4:.7"•eri,;:-,. -4-P-1'.. Z2•41.-..,' .,;•!,:":-';'r:,- -- .- . ' -. "F-.14::4-ft,19--: #:''..ft;',.k,':.,'..;-'.'' .•,'-.-. .. .• ::::::::•,..-;44..,...;,,,',.. ,,,,T•rfi.,43:-..:,....,,I, . • '.: . ; -- (-•.- c-' 161CC-CS-'• --\- --• i S,`----- (---- i,. 1 - - - (2.-- "•-•> G L - :�. - ,? .sSi '•Uaa' • ,i, { 2 to 4 j t --i -,-Ft,� F 3 '•3i- p il' x 4 t 4 fir"' _ s .wt . K! ?-- ` s&� {E . $',. , [ ( , k s tires .• `� te+. � T� $.� ?F`t.,. -,3 3 l j 1!4iis, �,,,T' 'C ;i F .ate.. 1'. i �� '•. • .lfg 55 e. ,YEf •I^fr �^t ,{ • t .'.-� v, . yx T 44 -. {qM '' - . , p:',- GCS-- - '^ `Salo- - .'#' � �`Yc..��j Y -. „t»f ;', } s " s '"' `� i" 'sc4��,, a::_.".-" • � � sw'.>...3�&_...�._''�v .x.t2 '�'-�'' c-i • 4 � \ ` It • tuft ' I`• ,� , �L�n .' �` '' $" 1 j. 01. 1,1 F' ;f' ., � y :,, 11: ' u 143 • \ Y" 4 • • • •• • � r' f 4 lib f .' 'i: :"" =�t 1` `�' ♦- eip,p - t41s7f't- f ,^s .. "".�.;K ^ter . "" �,. -�T �,,Y,. HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: May 18, 2005 AGENDA ITEM: 111-B. ITEM: 302 NE 7th Avenue (Hartman Townhomes). Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated demolition request, Class V site plan, landscape plan and design elements for the construction of a townhouse development. ' Ti JHi1i I I PUBUX N.E.1 STH ST. ■ — o I Z Z I } i x _ I ---,vi - I WALI— GENERAL DATA: GREENS N.E. 4TH ST._ Owner/ George Risolo, Peter Canelo, Eric - I Hauser _ _ W Agent George Brewer - I Location Northwest corner of NE 7thI Avenue and NE 3rd Street W . I Property Size 0.33 Acres - ;1 Future Land Use Map MD (Medium Demsity, 5-12 du/acre, N.E. 3RD — S7. I furrent Zoning RM (Multiple Family I� Hui I I ti IResidential) _ Adjacent Zoning North: RM (Multiple Family Residential) East: RM (Multiple Family w Residential) z South: RM (Multiple Family N.E. 2ND.- ST. Residential) - West: CBD (Central Busienss Z Z' I- District) m m1 Existing Land Use Residential � N.E. 1ST- T. Proposed Land Use Residential 8 r� i Water Service Existing on site. I Sewer Service Existing on site. t ( ,i SST ST. z VETERANS ,o 0 PARK z z ATLANTIC rr - - PLAZA x x vi vi i C'v_ Pi N T ill A T L A N TI C AVENUE ;� rmm Tnrnr� III. B. HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: May 18, 2005 AGENDA ITEM: III.B. ITEM: 302 NE 7th Avenue (Hartman Townhomes). Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated demolition request, Class V site plan, landscape plan and design elements for the construction of a townhouse development. PUBUX r - 1 IHE f C I I- S - S - 0 0 Z Z - _}_. _ - -w'• WAL- '^ _ GENERAL DATA: "� NS _ N.E. 4TH ST. - bi Owner/ George Risolo, Peter Canelo, Eric . } Y - Hauser Agent George Brewer _, a Location Northwest corner of NE 7th W . W Avenue and NE 3rd Street W t - Property Size 0.33 Acres Future Land Use Map MD (Medium Demsity, 5-12 du/acre�� t�tTel 'RC) - SI. � Current Zoning RM (Multiple Family I ` Residential) 'T =B I Adjacent Zoning North: RM (Multiple Family Residential) r East: RM (Multiple Family Residential) z South: RM (Multiple Family N.E. 2�ND- ST. Residential) ®3� - m West: CBD (Central Busienss 2 2rl F District) 2 =e u� N E ,sr C. Existing Land Use Residential _ Proposed Land Use Residential u, Z Water Service Existing on site. I Sewer Service Existing on site. i N.E. _ 1ST ST. z VETERANS 0 o PARK Z Z ATLANTIC } I > PLAZA x 1j x vi (A - vT N T S. . ATLANTIC AVENUE 1-1 fTT1 rrr- 1 (M Tu. III i i 11 • Ill. B. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is that of approval of a COA that incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for the 302 NE 7th Avenue pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F): ❑ Demolition Request; ❑ Class V Site Plan; ❑ Landscape Plan; and, ❑ Design Elements BACKGROUND The subject property consists of Lots 13 & 14, Block 113, Highland Park Subdivision and is located on a .33 acre site at the northwest corner of NE 7th Avenue and NE 3rd Street. The property contains a 2,752 square foot, two-story Frame Vernacular style dwelling which is known as the Hartman House, a 324 square foot concrete garage, and a swimming pool. The 1923 dwelling is listed in the Local Register of Historic Places and is zoned Medium Density Residential (RM). The dwelling is currently vacant. An application for Class V Site Plan approval for this development was submitted in November, 2004. However, as the two-story structure is non-conforming with respect to setbacks, the repair work that could be undertaken to it could not exceed 10% of the current replacement cost in any 12 month period and the cost of exterior modifications could not exceed 15% [LDR Section 1.3.6]. In the case of individually listed historic structures; however, the cost of improvements can exceed the 10% interior and 15% exterior maximum thresholds. In March, 2005, an application for historic designation for the Hartman House was submitted. The designation report stated the house was eligible for listing on the Local Register as it is associated in a significant way with the life or activities of a major person important in city, state, or national history, exemplifies the historical, political, cultural, economic, or social trends of the community in history,and portrays the environment in an era of history characterized by one or more distinctive architectural styles. The designation was approved by the City Commission at the second hearing on May 3, 2005. The applicant has submitted a Class V Site Plan Application for the repair of the extant historic dwelling, the demolition of the garage and swimming pool, and the construction of two new dwellings. PROJECT DESCRIPTION., The townhouse development proposal includes the following: ❑ Demolition of the garage and removal of the swimming pool. ❑ Repair and alteration of the extant historic building which involves the construction of a 958 square foot addition consisting of a two car garage with a bedroom on the second floor. The interior alterations and addition will result in a four-bedroom unit totaling 3,247square feet under a/c. ❑ Construction of two new dwellings, one of which will be a detached three story structure to the west of the historic dwelling, and the other will be a two-story structure attached to the north facade of the historic dwelling. The three-story building (Unit A) will contain 2,654 square feet under a/c with three bedrooms and a two car garage. The two-story unit will contain 2,400 square feet under a/c with a one-car garage and three bedrooms. HPB Staff Report 302 NE 7th Avenue -Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan & Design Elements Page 2 o Associated landscaping and construction of paver block parking with a driveway from the alley which accesses the garages of Units A and C. The proposal is for the construction of a townhouse development which includes the restoration of the Hartman House (Unit B), which is listed on the Local Register of Historic Places, and the construction of two new dwelling units. Unit A is essentially a detached dwelling three-story dwelling (attached to the Hartman Houses by only a covered trellis) and Unit C is a two-story dwelling attached to the Hartman House by means of a double garage on the first story and a bedroom on the second story. The Hartman House (Unit B) is a two-story structure which was built in 1923. The dwelling consists of stucco over wood framed walls with a pavilion-style roof over the main body of the house and a hipped roof section over the projecting section to the front (east) façade. SITE PLAN`' ANAL ,ANALYSIS' COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. LDR Section 2.4.3(B)(17) Details of the proposed wall lighting fixtures must be submitted. LDR Section 4.3.4(K) Development Standards Matrix: The applicable development standards that relate to the proposal are as follows: Required Provided Building Height (max.) Hartman House 35' New 2-story dwelling 24' 4" New 3-story dwelling 34' 5" Building Setbacks (min.) - Front (Hartman House) 25' 17' (New 2-story dwelling) 25' Side (Interior) 15' 15' Side Street (Hartman House) 25' 9' Side Street (New 3-story dwelling) 25' (1st & 2nd floor) 30' (3`d floor) Rear 25' 25' Open Space 25% 43.8% *The second floor balcony of the three-story dwelling extends three feet (3') into the side street setback. This conforms with the LDRs. HPB Staff Report 302 NE 7th Avenue-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan & Design Elements Page 3 Minimum Lot Size Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), multi-family and duplex structures require a minimum lot size of 8,000 square feet, and single family structures in the RM zoning district require a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. The total property area is 14,488 square feet therefore there is not sufficient room for a duplex and a single family dwelling. There must be a physical connection with a common fire-rated wall between Unit A and Unit B, which is attached as a condition of approval. The proposed covered trellis does not constitute a physical connection. Section 4.4.6 Medium Density Residential (RM) District In order to increase a project density beyond six (6) units per acre, the approving body must make a finding that the development substantially complies with the performance standards listed in this section. The intent of the standards is to mitigate the impacts of the additional density both internal and external to the site. The extent to which a project meets the standards will determine the number of units per acre that will be permitted. For example, if a project meets or exceeds all of the standards, and is otherwise consistent with applicable standards and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations, the maximum density is permitted. Projects which only partially achieve these standards will be permitted a correspondingly lower density. The performance standards are as follows: (a) The traffic circulation system is designed to control speed and reduce volumes on the interior and exterior street network. This can be accomplished through the use of traffic calming devices;street networks consisting of loops and short segments;multiple entrances and exits into the development; and similar measures that are intended to minimize through traffic and keep speeds within the development at or below 20 m.p.h. The Hartman House garage is accessed from a driveway off NE 7th Avenue. The garages for Units A and C and the guest parking are accessed from the alley which runs to the rear (west) of the property. As they are accessed from an alley, through traffic will be minimized and speeds will be kept below 20 m.p.h. This standard has been substantially met. (b) Buildings are placed throughout the development in a manner that reduces the overall massing, and provides a feeling of open space. The proposal involves construction of a three-unit townhouse development with a central courtyard containing a swimming pool. The Hartman House is two stories high and 32' wide (52' 10" including extension) with projecting front and rear sections to the historic dwelling. Unit A is three stories high and 28' wide and has an offset to the front. Unit C is two stories high and 30' wide with only a minor offset to the front. The offsets on the Hartman House and Unit A help to reduce the overall massing; however, the 50' façade of the Hartman House extension and Unit C has only a minor setback which does not alleviate the mass of the facade. Consideration should HPB Staff Report 302 NE 7th Avenue-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan & Design Elements Page 4 be given to introducing a greater setback for the extension to the historic building and Unit C. Based on the above, this standard has been partially met. (c) Where immediately adjacent to residential zoning districts having a lower density, building setbacks and landscape materials along those adjacent property lines are increased beyond the required minimums in order to provide a meaningful buffer to those lower density areas. Building setbacks are increased by at least 25% of the required minimum; at least one tree per 30 linear feet(or fraction thereof) is provided; trees exceed the required height at time of planting by 25% or more;and a hedge, wall or fence is provided as a visual buffer between the properties. The property is zoned RM and is bordered to the north and south by the RM zoning district, to the west by the CBD zoning district, and to the east by the R-1-AA zoning district. Only the R-1-AA zoning district has a lower density and this is not immediately adjacent to the development therefore this performance standard does not apply. (d) The development offers a varied streetscape and building design. For example, setbacks are staggered and offset, with varying roof heights (for multi-family buildings, the planes of the facades are offset to add interest and distinguish individual units). Building elevations incorporate diversity in window and door shapes and locations; features such as balconies, arches, porches, courtyards;and design elements such as shutters, window mullions, quoins, decorative tiles, etc. The historic Hartman House has a plain stucco façade while the new dwellings have hardi-board lapped sidings and decorative elements such as shutters, balconies, and decorative accent wood trusses, all of which add variation to the streetscape. The detached three-story residence has a higher roof which offers diversity; however, the roof heights of the Hartman House and Unit C are similar. Consideration should be given to lowering the height of the pitched roof over the connecting garage section to provide greater definition between the historic building and the new construction. The proposal includes varying setbacks for the three dwellings; however, consideration should be given to increasing the setback of the Hartman House extension and Unit C to provide further definition between the historic building to provide greater variation to this façade. This standard has been partially met. (e) A number of different unit types, sizes and floor plans are available within the development in order to accommodate households of various ages and sizes. Multi-family housing will at a minimum have a mix of one, two and three bedroom units with varying floor plans. Single family housing (attached and detached) will at a minimum offer a mix of three and four bedroom units with varying floor plans. The proposal consists of three units, all of which have different floor plans. There is a mixture of three and four bedroom units with 3.5 and 4.5 bathrooms and one and HPB Staff Report 302 NE 7th Avenue-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan& Design Elements Page 5 two car garages. As this development only involves 3 units, this standard is not applicable. (f) The development is designed to preserve and enhance existing natural areas and/or water bodies. Where no such areas exist, new areas, which provide open space and native habitat, are created and incorporated into the project. The site has been disturbed and thus, no natural areas exist on the site to be preserved, therefore, this standard is not applicable. (g) The project provides a convenient and extensive bicycle/pedestrian network, and access to available transit. A 5' wide sidewalk is proposed along NE 7th Avenue and NE 3`d Street, which will provide a pedestrian connection to available transit stops. This standard has been substantially met. In conclusion, the applicable performance standards are (a), (b), (d) and (g). A finding of substantial compliance with respect to (a) and (g) can be made. However, compliance with (b) and (d) will be achieved provided the conditions of approval are addressed relating to the architectural elevations. In terms of the performance standards for the RM zoning district, the proposed density of 9.09 units per acre can be supported. LDR Chapter 4.6 Supplementary District Regulations: Distance Between Residential Buildings Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.2(B), the minimum distance between Unit A and Unit B should be approximately 35' 6". The proposed distance between the units is 7' 8". Moving Unit A to the west, however, would result in the building not meeting the required setbacks, therefore, there should be a physical connection with a common fire rated wall between the units. In order to reduce this distance, a variance must be requested and obtained. LDR Section 4.3.3(0)(2) Townhouses and Townhouse Type Development Pursuant to LDR Section 4.3.3(0)(2), each townhouse, or townhouse type, development shall be platted with a minimum designation of the interior street system as a tract. When the dwelling units are to be sold, each such unit must be shown on the plat. The provision of a plat for this development proposal will be required prior to the issuance of building permits. In addition, the type of ownership must be indicated. This has been added as a condition of approval. Parking Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(C)(2)(c), two or more bedroom units within multiple family structures require 2 parking spaces and 0.5 guest parking spaces per unit. A total of 8 HPB Staff Report 302 NE 7th Avenue-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan &Design Elements Page 6 parking spaces are therefore required. Unit A has a two-car garage, Unit B has a double car garage and two spaces in front of the garage, and Unit C has a single car garage. There are also 2 compact spaces in the courtyard at the NW corner of the property giving a total of 9 spaces, therefore, the required parking has been met. It is noted that NE 3rd Street has been closed to through traffic, just east of the alley. Thus, visitors unfamiliar with the property/site layout will probably travel on NE 7th Avenue to access the residents. Based upon the proposed site layout, the only ability to accommodate guest parking in this situation is by utilizing the driveway of Unit "B", which is not practical for visitors and deliveries to units "A" and "C". Therefore, it is recommended that within the right-of-way of NE 3rd Street adjacent to the subject property that parallel spaces are provided or that on-site parking is provided from NE 3rd Street, which is attached as a condition of approval. Enclosures Required for Private Pools Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.15(B)(2), safety barriers around swimming pools shall not be less than 48" in height. Access can only be gained from the street to the pool by means of two aluminum gates, one between Unit A and Unit B, and one between Unit A and Unit C. The drawings indicate that the gates will be 42", therefore, they are not in compliance with this section of the LDRs. The gates must be raised in height to 48". It is also noted that if a baby barrier is not barrier Stacking Distance Pursuant to LDR, Section 4.6.9(D)(3)(c)(1), the minimum requirement for parking areas under 20 spaces is 5' which is provided. Dedication of Right-of-Way: SE 1st Avenue: Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.1(D) (2) and the Transportation Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan, the ultimate right-of-way width for a local street is 60' and only 40' of right-of-way currently exists for NE 7th Avenue and 50' for NE 3rd Street. For existing streets, the City Engineer, upon a favorable recommendation from the Development Management Services Group (DSMG), may grant reductions in right-of-way width. The City Engineer and DSMG have reviewed the request for a reduction in right-of-way width and have determined that a reduction in right-of-way width to 50' would be sufficient for these sections of NE 3td Street and NE 7th Avenue. Based upon the above, a dedication of five feet (5') of right-of-way is required for NE 7th Avenue, which has been depicted on the proposed development plans. It is therefore attached as a condition of approval that a five foot (5') right-of-way dedication is made for NE 7th Avenue prior to issuance of a building permit. Alleys: Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.1(D)(2), the required width of an alley is 20' or the existing dominant width. Further, pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.1(D) (3), additional right-of- way width may be required to promote public safety and welfare; to provide for storm water management; to provide adequate area for street trees; and to ensure adequate access, circulation and parking in high intensity use areas. Such a determination shall be advanced by a recommendation from the City Engineer. The authority for requiring such additional HPB Staff Report 302 NE 7th Avenue-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan & Design Elements Page 7 right-of-way shall rest with the body having the approval authority of the associated development application. The abutting alley to the west currently has a dedicated right-of-way width of 16'. The development proposal will utilize the adjacent alley for access and circulation. The City Engineer and DSMG have determined that the width of the alleys should be expanded to a width of 20', which is consistent with the widths that have been provided with recent redevelopment proposals. A dedication of two feet (2') for both alleys has been depicted on the proposed development plans. It is therefore attached as a condition of approval that a two foot (2') right-of-way dedication is made for both alleys prior to issuance of a building permit. LDR Section 6.1.3 Sidewalks Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.3(B)(1), a 5' wide sidewalk is required within the rights-of-way adjacent to the property. A new 5' wide concrete sidewalk will be installed along NE 7rn Avenue and NE 3rd Street. Possible Subdivision • There is concern that the existing bedroom, en-suite bathroom, and laundry on the first floor of the Hartman House could be used as a separate dwelling. The doorway from the bedroom to the laundry should be blocked-up and access to the laundry should be from a door via the Florida room. This would also remove the need for anyone entering through the rear doorway to gain access to the dwelling through the bedroom. This has been added as a condition of approval. Technical Items: The following Technical Items must be addressed with the submittal of revised plans prior to building permit submittal: 1) Details of the proposed wall lighting fixtures must be submitted. 2) The provision of a plat must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits. 3) The access gates to the swimming pool must be raised in height to 48". 4) Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.17, a Pollution Prevention Plan must be provided. 5) The alley must be improved to its ultimate width. LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS The proposed landscaping comprises of a mixture of existing and new plants. To accommodate the development proposal, a number of trees must be removed from the site. These include two Schieffiera Trees, a Carambola Tree, an Areca Palm, a tropical Almond Tree, and three Mango Trees from the NW corner of the site, a Norfolk Island Pine from the south property line, and, two Black Olive Trees and a Schieffiera Tree from the east property line. A number of existing trees will also be relocated. These include a Rose HPB Staff Report 302 NE 7th Avenue-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan &Design Elements • Page 8 Apple Tree and a number of Sabal Palms. Existing trees which will be incorporated into the landscape proposal include a Ficus Tree at the southwest corner of the property, and a Spanish Lime Tree, Oak Trees, and Mango Trees at the north property line. New trees proposed for the site include six Gumbo Limbo Trees, a Carpenters Palm, two Fishtail Palms, seven Coconut Palms, eight Travellers Palms, and two Cat Palms. The proposed underplanting includes Simpson Stoppers, Bush Allamanda, Cocoplum, Bougainvillea, and Jasmine Vine. The City Horticulturist has reviewed the proposal and determined the proposal complies with LDR Section 4.6.16. . . .`. DESIGN ELEMENTS/ANAE YSiS The proposal is for the construction of a townhouse development which includes the restoration of the Hartman House (Unit B), which is listed on the Local Register of Historic Places, and the construction of two new dwelling units. Unit A is essentially a detached dwelling three-story dwelling (attached to the Hartman Houses by only a covered trellis) and Unit C is a two-story dwelling attached to the Hartman House by means of a double garage on the first story and a bedroom on the second story. The Hartman House (Unit B) is a two-story structure which was built in 1923. The dwelling consists of stucco over wood framed walls with an asphalt shingled, pavilion-style roof over the main body of the house and a hipped roof section over the projecting section of the front (east) façade. There is also a single-story projecting central section to the east façade. The front (east) façade of the dwelling has a classical appearance as it is perfectly symmetrical and balanced. The central section of the structure projects 8' from the main body of the dwelling and contains the centrally-located main entrance door. The dwelling contains the original wood frame windows to the front façade which are of a traditional four over one design. The historic structure has almost no ornamentation apart from a wheel window to the south façade; however, this may have been added at a later date along with the corresponding out of proportion window on the second floor as they are off-center and inconsistent with the symmetrical design of the building. It has been recommended that the both these windows are retained; however, as they are part of the development history of the building. The lack of ornamentation on the Hartman House contributes to its classical appearance and, as such, it has been recommended that no ornamentation is added during its restoration. Proposed appropriate works to the exterior of the structure will consist of replacing the shingles, the insertion of a more appropriately designed window to the middle of the second floor on the south façade, window repairs, the addition of a canopy over the front door, repainting, and the demolition of the existing garage and swimming pool. The stucco walls will be painted light 'Sea Froth in color, the window surrounds will be Distant Gray', and the doors will be `Shadow Gray'. The proposal includes a two-story, pitched roof extension to the north façade which will attach the Hartman House to Unit C. The east elevation of this section will contain two arched garage doors. The walls will be of cmu with stucco to match the Hartman House, although the first floor will have a Cyprus lattice pattern insert. The windows on the second story of the proposed addition will be of a one over one design. Internally, the ground floor of the Hartman Houses contains a living room, dining room, Florida room, library, kitchen, laundry, a bedroom, and a two-car garage in the proposed addition. The second story contains three bedrooms, a den, and a further bedroom in the proposed addition. HPB Staff Report 302 NE 7th Avenue-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan& Design Elements Page 9 Unit A (west side of the property) will be a new three-story dwelling with a pitched, asphalt shingle roof. The projecting section of the front (south) façade will be faced with hardi-board lapped siding while the west façade will be faced with stucco to match the Hartman House. The windows will be of four over one and three over one design. Unit C has many decorative features which distinguish it from the historic building including aluminum shutters and decorative window sills, balconies with decorative brackets, decorative wood accent trusses, and exposed rafter tails. The hardi-plank walls will be painted'Gaucho Brown', the stucco walls will be 'Greenbrier Beige', the shutters will be 'Shadow Gray' and the doors and windows will be Mahogany stain. Internally, the first floor of Unit A comprises a bedroom, laundry and a two-car garage. The second story contains a living room, dining room, kitchen, pantry, and powder room. The third floor contains two bedrooms. Unit C (north side of property) will be a new two-story of similar construction to the new three-story dwelling. The first floor will contain two bedrooms with en-suite facilities, a game room, and a single-car garage. The second story will contain a living/dining room, a kitchen, and a bedroom with en-suite facilities. There will be a central courtyard to the three units which will contain a swimming pool and spa. On the exterior of the rear garage wall joining Units B and C will be a decorative cascade fountain. LDR Section 2.4.6(H) —Certificate of Appropriateness: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H)(5), the Board must make a finding that any Certificate of Appropriateness which is to be approved is consistent with Historic Preservation purposes pursuant to Objective A-4 of the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and specifically with the provisions of LDR Section 4.5.1. Future Land Use Element Objective A-4: The redevelopment of land and buildings shall provide for the preservation of historic resources. The objective shall be met through continued adherence to the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance and the following policies: Future Land Use Element Policy A-4.1: Prior to approval or recommending approval of any land use or development application for property located within a historic district or designated as a historic site, the Historic Preservation Board must make a finding that the requested action is consistent with the provisions of Section 4.5.1 of the Land Development Regulations relating to historic sites and districts and the "Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines". LDR Section 4.5.1(E)-Desiqn Elements Pursuant to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(a), (c), (g), (h), and (j), "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating alterations or additions of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: (4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, HPB Staff Report 302 NE 7th Avenue-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan & Design Elements Page 10 or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (8) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: (a) Height: The height of proposed buildings or modifications shall be visually compatible in comparison or relation to the height of existing structures and buildings. (c)Proportion of Openings (Windows and Doors).- The openings of any buildings within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the openings exemplified by the prevailing historic architectural styles within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors among buildings within the district shall be visually compatible. (g) Relationship of Materials, Texture, and Color." The relationship of materials, texture, and color of the façade of a building shall be visually compatible with the predominant materials used in the historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. (h) Roof Shapes.- The roof shape of a building or structure shall be visually compatible with the roof shape of a historic site, building or structure within a historic district. (j) Scale of a Building: The size of a building, the building mass in relation to open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, and porches shall be visually compatible with the building size and building mass of historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation states that: New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. Design Guidelines Locate an addition as inconspicuously as possible, usually to the rear or least public side of a building. In a historic district, consider the surrounding buildings and the compatibility of the addition in terms of size, scale, materials, mass and roof form. HPB Staff Report 302 NE 7th Avenue-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan & Design Elements Page 11 Do not introduce a new architectural style, or too closely mimic the style of the existing building. Additions should be simply and cleanly designed and NOT attempt to replicate the original design. Insure that the addition is secondary and subordinate to the main mass of the historic building. Additions that overwhelm the original building are not an acceptable solution. Analysis The development proposal involves the restoration of the historic Hartman House and the construction of two new dwellings to form a townhouse development. The restoration of the Hartman House will consist of mainly appropriate repairs which should be encouraged as the building will be put to an appropriate and sustainable use which will ensure its ongoing maintenance and repair. It is also accepted, that to make a development proposal viable, it may be necessary to extend a historic structure. In this case, the historic structure will be extended to the north by a two-story addition including a two-car garage on the first story and a bedroom on the second story. The additionion and the attached new two-story structure conform to the LDRs in terms of height, proportion of openings, relationship of materials, texture and color, and scale; however, as the extension is to the side of the historic structure, it is visible from the public right-of-way (NE 7th Avenue). A distinction between the historic structure and the new construction has been made by the use of differing materials and the addition of architectural ornamentation. However, this distinction could be made even clearer if the bedroom over the double garage was removed and the roof height lowered so the profile of the Hartman House roof was not interrupted. If removal of the bedroom affects the viability of the proposal, an attempt should be made to reduce the height of the roof. Consideration should also be given to increasing the front setback of the new two-story dwelling to further set it apart from the historic structure. Except for the changes recommended above, new two and three-story dwellings are also appropriate with regard to the LDRs, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and the Design Guidelines. The two new dwellings are of a traditional design yet complement the historic dwelling through the use of similar detailing such as window design. The use of different materials and a move away from the symmetrical appearance of the Hartman house; however, allow them to be differentiated from the historic dwelling. Neither new dwelling dominates the historic structure and, as can be seen from the color rendering, the Hartman House stands out because of its simplicity in color and lack of ornamentation, and its symmetrical design. With regard to the new three-story building, although it projects above the roofline of the Hartman House, it does not dominate the historic structure. The proposal includes the demolition of the swimming pool which was built in 1962, and the garage, neither of which appear to have any historic significance. REQUIRED FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official HPB Staff Report 302 NE 7th Avenue-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan & Design Elements • Page 12 record. This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body, which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to consistency with the Future Land Use Map, Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency, and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations. Section 3.1.1(A) - Future Land Use Map: The subject property has a Future Land Use Map designation of Medium Density (MD) 5- 12 du per acre and a zoning designation of Medium Density Residential (RM). The RM zoning district is consistent with the MD Future Land Use Map designation. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.6(B)(3), within the MD zoning district, multiple family structures are permitted uses. Densities greater than 6 units per acre, to a maximum of 12 units per acre are allowed, provided the proposal complies with the applicable performance standards of LDR Section 4.4.6(1). Based upon the above, it is appropriate to make a positive finding with respect to LDR Section 3.1.1(A), Future Land Use Map Consistency. Section 3.1.1(B) - Concurrency: As described in Appendix A, a positive finding of concurrency can be made as it relates to water, sewer, streets and traffic, drainage, parks and recreation, open space, solid waste, and schools. Section 3.1.1 (C) - Consistency (Standards for Site Plan Actions): As described in Appendix B, a positive finding of consistency can be made as it relates to Standards for Site Plan Actions. Section 3.1.1 (D) - Compliance With the Land Development Regulations: As described under the Site Plan Analysis of this report, a-positive finding of compliance with the LDRs can be made, provided the conditions of approval are addressed. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: Future Land Use Element Objective A-1: Property shall be developed or redeveloped in a manner so that the future use and intensity is appropriate and complies in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations, is complimentary to adjacent land uses, and fulfills remaining land use needs. The subject property contains a 2,752 square foot single-family dwelling which is currently vacant. It was constructed in 1923 in the Mediterranean Revival style and is listed on the Local Register of Historic Places. The development proposal is for the refurbishment of the historic dwelling and the construction of two new dwellings to form a townhouse development. The subject property contains no special physical or environmental characteristics that would be negatively impacted by the proposed development. HPB Staff Report • 302 NE 7th Avenue-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan&Design Elements Page 13 Zoning Designation: Use: North: RM Residence South: RM Multiple Family Residence East: RM Multiple Family Residence West: CBD Commercial As noted in the above table, the abutting properties are all consistent with the subject property with regard to zoning designation and are generally compatible with regard to use. Based upon the above, no compatibility issues will exist between the proposed residential townhouse development and the surrounding land uses, and positive findings can be made with regard to Future Land Use Element Objective A-1. Housing Objective A-10: The City shall support the conservation and rehabilitation of historically significant housing, especially where such housing is an identifying characteristic of a particular neighborhood. The rehabilitation of the Hartman House will ensure the structure's continued use as a dwelling and its ongoing repair and maintenance. It may also encourage the owners of adjacent properties to undertake repairs and, where appropriate, consider applying to have their property entered on the Local Register. LDR Section 2.4.5(F)(5) - Compatibility (Site Plan Findings): The approving body must make a finding that development of the property pursuant to the site plan will be compatible and harmonious with adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole, so as not to cause substantial depreciation of property values. The subject property exists within the RM zoning district and is bounded by a combination of residential and commercial uses. Compatibility with uses is not a concern, as the proposed townhouse development would be permitted on the surrounding properties and the properties contain a mixture of single family and multi-family developments with similar densities. ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION The development proposal involves the restoration of the historic Hartman House and the construction of two new dwellings to form a residential townhouse development. The restoration of the Hartman House will ensure the historic structure is put to an appropriate and viable use which will ensure its ongoing repair and maintenance. The proposal, once the attached conditions have been addressed, will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will meet the criteria set forth in Sections 3.1 and 2.4.5(F)(5) of the LDRs, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and the Design Guidelines. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS HPB Staff Report 302 NE 7th Avenue-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan &Design Elements • Page 14 A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan and design elements for 302 NE 7th Avenue), by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: C. Move denial of the Certificate of Appropriateness and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan and design elements for 302 NE 7th Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Site Plan Move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness and the associated Class V site plan, landscape plan and design elements for 302 NE 7th Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: 1) That revised plans be submitted addressing the technical items and conditions of approval noted in the staff report. 2) That a five foot (5') right-of-way dedication is made for NE 7th Avenue prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) That a two foot (2') right-of-way dedication is made for both alleys prior to issuance of a building permit. 4) That a plat for the development proposal is submitted and the type of ownership is indicated. 5) That there is a physical connection with a common fire-rated wall between Unit A and Unit B. HPB Staff Report • 302 NE 7th Avenue-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan &Design Elements Page 15 Design Elements Move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness and the associated design elements for 302 NE 7th Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, and the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, subject to the following conditions: 1) That the roof height of the extension to the north façade of the Hartman house is reduced through either the removal of the second floor bedroom or the redesign of the roof. 2) That the setback of the extension and Unit C is increased. 3) That the doorway from the first floor bedroom to the laundry in the Hartman House is blocked up and entrance to the laundry is gained via the Florida room. Attachments: Survey, Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Elevations Report prepared by. Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner HPB Staff Report 302 NE 7th Avenue-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan&Design Elements Page 16 APPENDIX A CONCURRENCY FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1(B) Concurrency as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs of the requested land use and/or development application will not exceed the ability of the City to fund and provide, or to require the provision of, needed capital improvements for the following areas: Water and Sewer: ❑ Water service exists via the 6"water main along the alley to the rear(west) of the property. ❑ Sewer service exists via the 8" sewer main along the alley to the rear(west) of the property. ❑ Adequate fire suppression is provided via the fire hydrant to the north of the property and the fire hydrant across NE 7th Avenue from the property. Pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan, treatment capacity is available at the City's Water Treatment Plant and the South Central County Waste Water Treatment Plant for the City at build- out. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to this level of service standards. Drainage: A preliminary drainage plan has been submitted indicating that drainage will be accommodated on- site via an exfiltration system. At this time, there are no problems anticipated meeting South Florida Water Management District requirements. Streets and Traffic: A Traffic Statement has been submitted by the applicant which indicates the proposal will generate an increase of 10 trips per day which will not have a significant impact on the surrounding neighborhood. Parks and Open Space: Whenever a development is proposed upon land which is not designated for park purposes in the Comprehensive Plan, an impact fee assessed for the purpose of providing park and recreational facilities shall be imposed. The amount of the fee shall be $500 per dwelling unit regardless of the size or occupancy of the unit. As there will be two new units, $1,000 will require to be paid. Solid Waste: The proposal calls for the rehabilitation of a historic dwelling and the construction of two new dwellings for a townhouse development. Trash generated each year by the development will be 2.4 tons of solid waste per year(3 x 0.8 = 2.4). The Solid Waste Authority indicates in its annual report that the established level of service standards for solid waste will be met for all developments until 2021. Therefore, a positive finding can be made to this Level of Service standard. Schools: A School Concurrency Application is required. HPB Staff Report 302 NE 7th Avenue-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan & Design Elements Page 17 APPENDIX B:_ , STANDARDS FOR SITE PLAN ACTIONS A. Building design, landscaping, and lighting (glare) shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent B. Separation of different forms of transportation shall be encouraged. This includes pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles in a manner consistent with policies found under Objectives D-1 and D-2 of the Transportation Element. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent C. Open space enhancements as described in Policies found under Objective B-1 of the Open Space and Recreation Element are appropriately addressed. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent D. The City shall evaluate the effect that any street widening or traffic circulation modification may have upon an existing neighborhood. If it is determined that the widening or modification will be detrimental and result in a degradation of the neighborhood, the project shall not be permitted. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent E. Development of vacant land which is zoned for residential purposes shall be planned in a manner which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent HPB Staff Report 302 NE 7th Avenue-Class V Site Plan, Landscape Plan & Design Elements • Page 18 F. Property shall be developed or redeveloped in a manner so that the future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; complementary to adjacent land uses; and fulfills remaining land use needs. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent G. Redevelopment and the development of new land shall result in the provision of a variety of housing types which shall continue to accommodate the diverse makeup of the City's demographic profile, and meet the housing needs identified in the Housing Element. This shall be accomplished through the implementation of policies under Objective B-2 of the • Housing Element. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent H. The City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent I. Development shall not be approved if traffic associated with such development would create a new high accident location, or exacerbate an existing situation causing it to become a high accident location,without such development taking actions to remedy the accident situation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent J. Tot lots and recreational areas, serving children from toddler to teens, shall be a feature of all new housing developments as part of the design to accommodate households having a range of ages. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential developments located in the downtown area, and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent LEGAL DESCRIP TIGN LOTS 13 AND 14 OF BLOCK 113 IN HIGHLAND PARK,AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, , ACCORDING. TO THE PLAT THEREOF ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT DED IN PLAID BOOK 2,FOR LM BE P EACH79 COUNTY, FLORIDA, • LOT 12 LOT 17 BL❑CK 113 BLOCK 113 POUND 5/D' FOUND 5/B' r?: IRDN ROD S 89.48'08' E § IRON R00 7 V 7135000'' �oo � 15D' X . x X q° ��N f, 07' ,Lry ♦ ♦♦ N 22.1' 1;•ki b LOT 16 c ♦♦0p X`♦� :•;l POOL o x BLOCK 113 r 1 LOT 13 "`+ ¢ BLOCK 113 ♦ J I J Q.. POWER - : i'n t'35 POLES 5CREENEb/CdNC' ♦♦4 Q, �w POOL DECK ♦� W LA" 3i , ,, x -- = ♦♦h° is - . a LOT 15 Z '' LOT 14 '8.0' DA i N,E BLOCK 113 '" '5' BLOCK 113 2 STORY 4.EDNc,vAt •.r', RESIDENCE 5. 1 0000) �J / ,� CM. 177 'L�'' x'' F.F.EL.4 12.94 ' "0 __ 9� d GARAGE :r. ,,: ♦, Y 80' 21�6' p \ 18.0':. } , c �� b 34.0' ? ♦'A fro y FOUND 5/8't.-----"--..-FOUND J�, .1/d�l:I�`�"1:1�:- - [RON ROD PK NAIL { DISK o, /Sp m e0.0:� OS' _moo—o- o a o ♦ X I 135.00' fir f�°' R N 89'39'57' W y 0 ,. FOUND 1 ..D 5/0'� ♦♦'y NAIL 4 DISK JRDN ROD b X WATER VALVE�DC rj�'"' b FIRE g ♦py* ♦pPp HYDRANT cuRD (50' R/W) I .. f._ . .».� ( 0 ., .II lik.,,,„„„„.,,,,:„.,7,7,1:514,j , / 44,1.11',#,7„ictaR/"'„/N/7„/,/: ..r.a..., at...r-'=w4ssix.:.... OWL.....7/1•1141 WOE 1141117./301 FAY. 317.117.1712 littAltAKIIITUILIK.0011 4.10.11011MSP.MIMM0•100.10...0•7 W1•111.1•••.011 MOMiNI01.01.1•••••110,OP•••••••••0171••••••••=11•00••••••100•00 0,10,70.1,01....1—'..-"..—*. .....- i I 1044 Mr ., tc 2 A ?Iii4iffiWINOPPIMiiaMiiiifiiiiiif:0, ii° ''''. .' .?: "It MWOONV.R1,;!ifil:lii;;Si!igli1;;i5,102,,,,,07, loprAnop.,...„ 0 Out note..,•!;••• ,..gtg,gtl,gtkg,,gziz:ItIgstr•;•:,,g*gzg'zre,ga g gti,g;,g,,,,,:•,ti r:•,.,,,:d 1191imi a pi IL,.'- -•,,, • ..,.... ....,,,_ 0 g .„:„5„:„,4,4,1,„::::„,„,m...4... . — „, 1 1, = ..„ . ........ 9 p , . • iiiii VAL IMOLA I!.ii Pg0:WalMrs:ef4Tiqq,gf#5frg,., ' ff.I k..4:14 PA F.1,71 Z] cai iti 111liii 1 , ; -:i. Z • „ „..„.. ., \ -'' ,.,4,... -•i,'-' fm.z...7 j....,..,: i rw.-{ V.6. V.••• ,14,..4%. g:".= NO,.....40'11'C Litt...."7111.0[1.1.1=--1 A•*;•,71; ''''''''''''''''''' 'ill'i" - • II' V.,„, ' MKS NA. AMA 0 1 ,,,,,......51,,.... •am.• I 't .,Y In.allAq.4 , 4.^.3 ,ic.4r ....johiriqmpirigitayo,,,,v=ri ,.*:,0:;i0),Wir,Ai 1141,,, , Atli :1'Aui Kil , PARKING SPACE STRIPE DETAIL ea. 7;,•',.,.:;;;;;;.1.4:.;:•0.,•0•=1:.•,.,,..;,,,. . ........'.'..... 1 silk.1,,.... . ... ..•, ' i54 , ,«il . . ,..v,'."',....,..:,....,,,, ; ...;,.... ..6.i.,0•wo:000;;;;;;;. •;%.; ,..i.1., 1,. KI.O. i..-4 UJ 0 • — r''',.e''''%`%`•`;`:44.1:Z:.:4, .,,,;., ,,.1 I 1 ors"7nr'..,, PAII . ...'t,f;N%'''501i5W5t51 It = 3.%:•;'A,..,,,,'''''',i`ii'M 1 • •Iiiiiii pp,toilogommiyi ,A.F,;It .2 c. l•t 1 • 6- .,,,:dk,m,, 3iNidlifiliNSa,,_ 1::a--!1,1 liVilegWiaqUII!!WI...A.iz 411 Pr .e.- r Irgi'- -7,7,1,,, , )ik,--- 4 <5 -5 6 ..._r- Ei......,.., ......',ggiit. , i 1. N inj 1 i arTAZ4 iiiiima---iza mai T.''''' :,..,,p1 4,.40•0;0-! -......r, [.?2, vs w 1514•11,,, • z,..- al -.--- .1!II,'..-;...;,4 ''. •. '. ',D.:7. .. '‘ .---. 1 1..,, •' ":(7.?„"1.,1Nr="'.5:,t;i: ....zuraxarz.., -.A•z """ --41.:"11 rap..r""frilf o' -.0"Al:y...,=- 0 ,10,r 6 5.... I i r'' . Is ._1 g"•,....7, ' 11 - I•1...=,:A=.. .1ii. i =v„ :5•I;0:10 0, „1. ,.." ,,,,,,d,•,,,,1 d,ij I [1.',. i li, 6r, ..r , I 2r.^1.44=4" ...5iN •- -./4,,A.•,.,, I4./, A /' — p ,:.,;- 1 i , , ,!, •-•-• -.. VI:,' „41 „:,.., ,p,......4,,d., A„, , ._., t a• 1 • iu•s4r• , ' .. eti.ra, :41, ,i,m-zak... .„,,, — .,.„T .mi :„... r- ,,..,....,,i..,..:„..,. .. ..,.:...„Atrial r * 1... 5 P5.1. , , , ' , ,.. S ., RN . .. • ..F.-?-..-t-,,f '•%. , iV..,,,-.'.•.t.t%.!,..,•.'1:2..,.t•,.^,..,,i.. '....,,...:.'.4,,t..'...:, 4,•'.•,,,,,f NUR* . - i 119C.ATICON MAP 1 7 P-§.-i I ' . MM. DATe H•1•41.4 ..• e NAL,SPU,VIIIIIIIT I PERMIT NQ , ADA90A151 .7.2,•06 644f Silli MITAs V.Z":1.1-----------,0 1-0II IY L411•1•OTECTIO.14•111747L7•1172 .0O:111:140...T.DIKUP RI PROPOSED SITE PLAIN. . TOTAL*MI AMA.14.441 U.!AA AO )) TOTAL FaVISED'ifs AIWA 1.1.1.031.1..&II ACREIll AAI 6 411.j1k • TOTAL 0.110.N17 1.1.001.1 SALOP*POOTPIL.NT.AA2S IP.•IL14,CI 6711 t TOTAL 011C4742 PLO011 osugocarrix OUILDIT0 AMA.4.05 0?. I" • 10.40" TOTAL TWO PLODIt 1*31170)TIAL 7711•01,42 AMA.MI SA TOTAL,ettILDINO ARIA•1,102 M. g . TOTAL.PA41.717.PARSOY1 AND IIAL•311AT ARISAd/.145 el.,22.14 GP bad g ITOTAL LAND604RD ARILA6.&DI Il.t NA.0 SITE) 1 WE 0714SITT 7 1.RITO Mt ACM•30*SP.AVAI LNT/144416P.•ITS WT. PA0)0,41 WU=Kft TLC/NM 140160a14)PARRIPIT*•11•2211014 UHT@ el, TOTAL TANDEM/.APKNO!PAGES PRONDVD.I TOTAL.CURACAO PAAKIAIIIPAL71 PROVOW.1 sil . ' TOTAL CtrIPACT 50AC:1111M000110.1 TOTAL PAI•14.40 SPACI•PRONOCO•• • • . _ . . I . I INIS11410 TWO I I sEfollty1/40 Oesittzeie 0 I AT 1147tg..ria I ••,,,::"..f.- -,-:.- Fl..., r I 12.3.00. *4‘,16.._........7........_.__________...._..1.___....___;.....___._ ..,....„. vv. 1 1 T. '• .07:z%•4•D .,. NM kW> 'VIM) 41:: 1 In 1\ )::•:::;, I . war—- [__ I El 1.3 I I I .. ., gitna" ranlirnmeomm 1 ill pk: g • I i ' . ' 1 IX EL.•WM 44 1 I I 10FZE91E7 1 a 1 I '.' I, 1.:.I 7 k -ml_i-f 1 1 I i I I') w- I 1`"/ 4/11c at4, 1 SITE DRAINAGE k , —;.. -- 1Pr:i::a - 1 P:;.. . I cf.:: I law. Nit iirr' . is) „ k .01/* .., i 1''' .. I / • ''.:,' 7 4 II Ias sus es n ale is rt. IDAI 1 ay 1 ) , • ,,.;,-.-i.s. . ritiug. ta.7,. giltn :';.,..'..- ' ' I 11111 NNW 1111111.111111 4r- I Ism ,, . I ittfiliffikuirkrarinsamias. 1 4.1:tirt i.,i It, ... nil 1 ,. • ,,., ...„,, . ..c i-, , I mr,..,........... ,:sau fetiMili•"el" : 1.3101167"ill n I - I r-- Hi rr.a..sem •NM-- -- 1---- illip ,,,•,•.%,. III' ..1.,{I ii:I 1 NU/1110N. .--- '1% Tell! ''Ir Ilip liiii 1 WI WM MIMS • I I IN shkiVis I CST WSW COWS I I II 1 i - I:" rn -.., 17.gl....INA I . i , ;., I I i i..';Il Cij I I ma Ws J I ,:g.',Z L 111111•11•11=Mi Intl.IOW* /11:kb, ..:;.i..t.::' I 1 ! I 1 :4„,..! , H Fl — — --1 •, ' l.,i4,; • I ic,:. I I aim sec LEGEND !!-OW „Ai!, iffg No 4.4 N I 11111771.MIN 'er ilan> . :;5'r; "" 5:% III Mlle saw us,roc reas •••••Ir 1111--.. .L.... INIWINT air a :seStra ow :,F .. . I MOMS tows UR TM 1101..... ''ICi:•4;:' -s .4)1: ',''III". .t.:sq;I•••Z':':I'•-•*;'';':•'.'14! I'•::,CO,Tg tII IX:if/ I:;t:ii '.;.''. IV;.,.. ,...; :6..... '.'‘:',.-.'..i:,44,..glYII',I.I.It:',2: .C'I' ' MIIIIIIIN Of UM NNW •--•\,•--.• -. I I nlic , "rave. PIIIIIIMIY111111 ..m........ ...... ../ I 1 aiimeirms;ow iews. j' ...., I IIS,i. L ._...., . 1 VIM OM- ,• 11 I A 1. lx1 II k OP 1 • NI' t 30 l'ANT4r1.1, ' VALVE a'14:1107 WM...... - •••• •.....11.:6P.•— •••-.. LCOnaliellaliSIZ 70 KIM 11.1111...... .... — ..... . ..— DATE SITE PLAN NOTES i$$$$$ re It 1. , .......„., I/1 KOONINKC INN VC 011Y CV Mar 1111111 001111111108111110011111.111111. NMI 111101101111 Liatlal=i I ..r.::.:.t.;(11.17'• . 11111110 MP 1111 0:411117/011011 ISM ' : pr.. eaffeaSEfft,:l lk.„. f.;:it a .am 1. '..:.''.7.i:: !! ......i.4. -- . arjgrar. ..:...„.imair....ow..mi mom . 201248gagingar1111 41111111111 sum S. atausssur If WINK RS . 11It 0711 11 1111010 VEAL MAK 111111 W 11 111 10 I& 11M11111171111 X1111 MSOSNI/X MIN to. fics ...lialisum1111:411 0111111ft 01011K4111. 0:1111WHIEll AM kfn owners ROW 7"I I • _______.• . _ I31r«4.wm , REVISIONS BY/01, tR4WOIW OQ 12S06 PER 171AMREIT. WO SCAPI CALCULATIQNQ P' a WI 1lW1AEVL4l01 tkAMNYLY.COWFMM411WS,WM) 0 0 / ` ® • ®' P414441 IL.G W,nYn.4 alta• A. 11W 44 EfJSIXMAI CALCULI I \\ MU ® Au IM14..11LOTMI.Wa41011440 10.W 1A1 1 I \ 0 0 MTI44Mi1p 1OT.W 1.141. 11..4...w 10wq.d. 41 4. 0. MU a1441 aNAa Cau.AWuwID 1.144a P4hW4.na a.NW w.a. yy ® ML01 /', `lit/4i ICa.a1 4d.1 PA....3.A. WO 4a '7 �-' �- P 1� �, . e AA1.AaPwdu1aP11CuwrvwD 114 41 • aw1.h4.,1w4w 14 Na i f .,'� is 128.00' �_ �4 ©. I. Asu4D...14. A4 4a 01.44.414.14.4ww. II_. _ 1..3 ..........1... n 4. I / V t-tp / _ / / j• i I'- / / GO/wf4� l'r'" InlUinunlUludll %{/ / /' 147 P ..,MV4.1Aw1.1aaP .w..a.....p...l lrww ,. ,ifif} 1fu0/�'' '�.Os��'�� plll_• UIII!� �//�� %�/ .��% 4 Mr41 44.4O1u A4.N0A .114411 D.....414 1 ! (A'V.ui'.��?�!R,i I I I� ®P' I ' r/L j�: A Mi 1.1.1a11L40WNA0P AMMO m1 4. ...war a in. fl lIIIi' a ' 1 f i j `� /� '<�j � 0 00.41 I I�IIIIIIOMIIIIIII�''1� A s i• t �IMII o,, ".iff1410 r., .Nr 1 11.1.1.40111403.1114.4 F.0.1® W Nl � L,•„ w. ' Y. D/Kwwn a.Daru.a uDI41I 1 Two ; ✓'i ifi i�.t,& •I ,'1r, •`_ i• ¢S"�1i� "-1'Ilfis+l\t �.� ,t/��% s 1 an1.wn.r / 1 .. M1µ 4.111441.w.+e1P 1r,. .t fi E .4•. ifii S iy Si '-Ir��1 op.,. 4 n 44a,4w A1.wo, n r 1 £S" iL£j`;\� ._•`'` i 0 �- T• .2�...� ur w 1 aw.0 n .vu url ww.pne j ££•�%`, ,a• S. _•` iY:ifii,`%? S`..;yift 4 WW1.WA1.14.1 Yl11,N40W'10 M • ' £;o `"J 1A•' : h£ 0 WA& HE •L,1=s•;s,£% N 1.,p1 •'"•' 11091400,00r,0160 1` © W� i.l�: __ p/jrILI 0. MOLnY4a NRUIT04nE4 Otto 31 rn. Y,y �.f�•�,• ,, ,o4laAww A. 0044Aa.1 a UR MU r04414MD j:•..7"•x• ,SI�•v�. w1. , -�P. �„. s 3sif,tY 0 TWO-STORY 471.1111 r P a4.1..144M.. :;1: 44AY,.a1u1.1.M s3s........................f£ ^fiq: //li ®• •RESIDENCE p ,bs, J �� Q la4 f1 =£ S it.1 - s";L.;Y ,Is /3./.7I T014N`w.43 a..mv14.11.0 y Q.'a 2• £22 f fs•Y s' r ,J ./(,4 Ala �� ,(p// U �;Ya�_ f'. fLe-a' i V? i rD1Aa44w1a1uua.nAMlwwccD 4 n. Zo . ..£ _2'PrF'f.£,' �• £`^��.,j££•t I' »©'0 '31R i d"'l:f/ 1 ...4 .4.4I At nVAI 1 0 s/1ti::, / I ® F a •g ® elf£>' .,S22,,:'i'' ';f:'S''2;= v_ v d AZ IS*MATERIAL SCHEDULE L�- y'�, �� I "°d" _ • s£104 I © © 't4 ,, 1 ©� ,i f zsi<sw s jf n z�ti� V s Oly. Eb1IIJcW Cartoon Rama Size ux.m.n 11,-...--,,,7/047,6,44in3-,k,::)!f �LrL:it. /,cn j 2f=,. ✓�y C�•.id=^� s� \� ADW11Y '6 174i ' ^.i1 I.S�f=i;fj= h', $'=f1f' Ll1 ce Bl 4.. �,,,, .1 P yr4vPalnaruw V 1 ��}t �y O. pr ! / �J 11 ww.Iwwm44 d.FKa i 51 0 •,.., = 3�3• +' �'a. j- W Q ye w4 0`��...d w""4w.. 4d: ��14��i1�� 11 © ® jy u 1 t f, f :FI' 0 © s i t i i d3,ne Pt, . ; m �. d ul OW a.a.... •• • r'' S'/7 W.d © _ 0 S= i _ I. o:144.»•1..w.1.. •. o 4� 1 Pill 1t © ,L si• ,,a > . Lu W_ Wows I.d•..a.WK..4144aK n4a4.. ® tJI q 1 ''I 0-STORY g iliA50'4"1'54'5ek'21,4..•,N/•?li6L�'� t.• © . 2. : t f +`� +�'y Q ,C r��//�i�\ Yw•,�ny.;'.,�`xt SjJ /Q1 a cV C.1 u w4 w Cawow. *Inma Div \V � I CE E1t, R ,.....t:t -E&II.I Fil _ ' z ~ v t a�w `"°.w4p, A.1 LwousaaulDMan,Tyro. ►Ale .� is , p 0 214. • 0 IL. , 1 p• ♦ O'' 0 '5a• 4. 0.4 .w.44 ..rw 1.4.rpwl.-I ► t� %/" I, s , 0 a• 'S':' Y ni I- K (' cvM � ® n N 0.. wp..........,1,.,..,..4 I.,>4.,.. ll 1 w1r.. © y>.i S ©.� m• 1.1 Z4 .. 0 \�4�1 SiN. #C' o v A7 , JJ ....; Iv �`.1a1r`� � I 0 Q. w• P.+w..4»4..uw. 414 1 , t:;: '"�iV © p�� EI131 0 EXISTING !© 'illinagiiii i►`.�v�"` ®WI:.. w 1.1'4 4. 144.a.w.wo.+or41.41. 1M014 rid ! '�.', %• © , Fj E ® Q TWO-STORY n ` v�o4 41• waY44iq.lpN.4f Y rhP Ey la,•:;'t= © _ Z w 4 w % .4wr..Yw...Dw+, ,14014 "4. `IS �' ® �-_ E Lq Tr RESIDENCE © . ryn u P+.,a ,. i I I ..4._ I 1• i {;=f = _Az J_ nfCa£2HI.a Crf J 4 p. M.ww .4....r 3•401.'w a 1: ■I. 12!I£II11 I\ z a� /; -sap nY ro, ryv'r .©R Aftwori 1£III/�,�1 /�//%/��ilr 1 2�Ss IA 1`�!10/ Iw...1© 2 n 4 Warm sra...... Naara '© 7..1"11Y lir r '•i•ijll£�I j'£��/ © © Q 0 igr:i t n a• T4.prAPwdrN O4a 14 'f$}K 9 i itl�$i$�{pjl. �'' © N.II'la �-•t 0 1 W 4.1.44 1444 14.M LL Obit �'•Y,z f �� J/^�f,' ®� _/'I �I{I�Ask., 1 V 1D AWIw+.duwl4l 11�dT.a I11 'V�►J► I`f A •` 3 c 7I 1I `�� :u R • c.444p*wtoW.e i w,y.p1. �1a.r Pw1v.m1nr4WI ��/ ' enn1, • j �iali.r/.r Y If111=1►i1I.t.,.�lll/ I © W CO /1/ _�(// 's r 11•-111 f�' •IS/ r RI >. 4 w• M.w...wwwr •' Ilk I Yam• r :�r �.'r li :::::,1 4 ...4.A..,4..4,_,.4. ,�p.1_ W1W44Y1Y �iliWi ' i--„I,f 1011lll )/ */�1+1..set a4.aa.w4p.a n ,p.14.4ww4a4 404 "4pr4 f p 4 f/ ►► /ry� 1 a. a.+.4 14414 a00a144 w. r14144 ,Irr/1�1 IA1.Mom A,ft1T6//..♦t .-.)�i�tillW 3 a) 4 1N f... wgn144 14Ws -* CO 110444.4.41404. senor. p\ a-•�_�+�-1� ). QfLg� ,��•'J'f•. S�/./� I t- W 1,11141111111 ................ 7 II, .w'n.l 1.0.+ I 14,1'.41 : 1I!!!1r %V� 4.dW.pW e'm 0 0' O Q 44.4.11.1.4.41.04 4 .4Ai Cr. Q Z Z •C44 pMwndr M.1.114.1w WM �, ® © 4 4+4.10D 0 O 4CC.1 N. R �.. wW. "44414.1 110006 UM-- 4DO3M40w Wa4a1a 0 440AIVII TO M040.1NM OOYIMOI TO ALL UM04•APIAMCAa,FMOA11D.1 • fw/4 anal � I, m...140W.r..1a ® O 1a4nwroucP.LnrouwlrusAP.Pruy, _ (� N.E. 3RD STREET_ _ 0) Iw ® SO'-0'D101i Cc WAY - Z Q • ui.dv"p4u;ag1'a;:..� w4p1w mw..Pva.a.omaN"wwwrw+r dmM �` „id _ 3. ww.4144.14aM a W..Iw m.n. 14 Insp.rd m0Wdp04 244 1...1•441hd 1..41 S •. 1044 Y..1 Q i•• Ei 4w.4ow 1w m.dw We.400 al.0.11•lar144 w 4141..04 h Mu.UgpOY 04.64 rW��.� 4 r..l l( I E7 14.on Iv m.Wg401.a.4wo 4gaap44hx14 w0c.1 cm.alaMwlryaW44 w wtdpc141 .A` :�:1_ 14• //�� ..10,41dalgA..P4g.nm.Mm.p4.d..1.gv4.114 Da bw[4 p l.w4d.d w I4!IW 4.._ 1 ��nwL: $ V Z 1.30...10.• P44 • �-Y1. • •'.. . $��yyYY�� 1`u N w we w4.4......1.4.44.4 w411.c4.4M441.wn4.l4n..pw..dw mop 44. •.4Y6yY y� y"A • }u w Z iM ro.aw..a.ml.4m.n»da.4W+...o.4da xnmw4mmm,an1.11wa44..00 SSWb�' - .•••r "'"•, :.j py» C Q N d...1w4m91.1a1..1 W.a 0olp cww.w.l D.l.....M.444 a ea..a41. 0 Cdlo,dl.do-r141ga+w. 0441..41.4.m..a raw..wcngh4•p w ra nwrop4 • 1 0 y 1110...pm>wwwd.Yww4a...4.d.41.aewowa ,OsoundCovus • • J A..0..4414.iwlr/D...410414.O.maJx441414w04b.M.4014,'A010nY AM.. 10400 hi.Lw4NN pr 1.44410d,add .wmda..1l.c 0mn.d.1'a1. - . I.4.»I1014M.414141.1,10.1 d4.1n.4.4...Al 401.w4.4•41.5....a44 4 .nµb1ad0,0104.*M41WI'4ra7Ar,w.powl04d.0001NA4AO1.44444O 00 �` 1..we...,4!•'1' ' '9I1 W.i4wdv4.aqp....nawr-..a.+>wa......4.w4a1p a.I.D.W+..n...r.wmr • ' l••••r444»14f „� r w�,,,,,��' i.l Il Da,,., 1..44/411.p..pa41.ry1....y,yyyap4. ...14141a14.4.4.4...PI 41. ., .' W. •� +Myw4.w....... .Nm.4hY Olpwwa4lgp.»OO.rdIw WMO.abnlrowddDcd.44meW a»bfilNaw.q 0404.ir Re.w W.44 w4 'r.l 44.44 J •w4•w..'w"w 7 II .4 b00000tl1.0w144104M ad Mw11w a 4MAq Carwabhl.d..ry a.r.al m4bd .11.9 W.Y41 vPr MNPI1� •gMYW' �I�� '�, 1..........44 IN.4 a y......11 14410.w114.n.441.14410•1a M F m 4•4 NIw4.1OB "»„w F4.1 1►44,1•• MMu1 y"M 1. w.rla.n4.-v1141.0004w.1414,4w.ww.•4e...ro..41.10.4...1..14. ..ate • 14..44.• s' PI ..1p4,114r.. 10/07 04 ..WI41..4ager.....11.1...4Mc.0.cow..14w1.D.wb14 d411.4...4430411a w t"\ / ..001.4 400.4 Nv641p.wd14.m•.nawsd.3..w.1.4•41lw.o44....,w. s11' •"11� r-..w 14,1 1',V a w iiY4....wl..r.4nr' .4 p14g 1gwe.w...O•w..44.6 44 d..41,..w4.w"4 • ..w r4.-". I _,noN.. .14,Y.., - ;'- 11,�1a' d41114.411111.Y.ro404a10 War.011DLa pw 11o4y1.p014 aw.11.404d11.4dck.Y !,I `~ la!� ff 011q 1w 41.41n 0q.1 01 pw,dgm4n a1•14014 nq Pbpldd.bn ! BTU, l&444 p.&0ald.a lhdw 440. 0404w.110411.0.14.0.40440 dwy4,d.. `. Ir'.4 0{'1$.10 .d•44.4411044.11.4.41 J.041r1.1.OW.v.4 w mdvdp4 w 004.4043 • •v 41 .4..14.1Y.4.4.0 Won r b.11.14.010.0mhaw 11.4. 1.141.4..44.1.0 no»q M1.1. 4.1 44 1a1a4bnd N04.mO4A..14 krWuw .cma4aa h.lw»r.aq.adaNl.Pc40m.IwlY wow.pu I4.I. I' :'•-':��q .• . • 4M6a.M _ 1 41N 4 S......wM4'ome.rm.m. ••.7,;. . w.W..1.4... 1 00.0.i. I.Al pc. ,1d 1110.0000.4001la 4.404 cml.1..omnN..d, _7}I/I .'.a. • Numeric•uenry ROJKt,All P oJ10N ni label Olkttp Av g g Mry Me, I.vgMm Mae*, •M1 R1 :. 1 GkPu l.t-MI 11011n0 IIMIWRI M 111 1O 01 302 !O0 13 t jEM TY0 / jj'M6fN � / 1K R AM& PHONE 111nx16al b}ORY BUILD11.45 113. alq)14731! RY�ILG � // I I 54 5 75! 5s 12 ®^7 1! 1! Id 11 I j Sa 5a 5.+ 5A la 1 i tali !y I .�. 111111I 5A a1' I Q en -� I ®� r I ms t•I is ®s m., !i�• �`""cam ill to 3m a,i mm I Z tg . I II /11401 O : I I 10.1 I. Ll l •W M re "'I' 1r I. a lo! Is i? t ' ilk lilt �� 1 I F a I.c Ira tinI - r "or? 5A[ t°� O! •la U' III :^ ��I��. � 11 ��- r • ms 41► rw �= la! is ' W= i1\7II'f b° rl'r p;...■i� gi It ^m ' �) ® e ilh�, is el I 1 w•} it :c . r.,,,L6, ulllo. IS_ m! t! IF1 !H' II I .L 0 5A e. P ffi-J1 4, .1.I . o O0, 111 I ;i,:,,7h ti}<t_, > 73• .r, _\�.;'ttCi, � t.,. }� �-.,.::el rat�'l '%J ti . l ti t m. I ��RR�. ��RRII�0 I DATE 1.1.04 „- WI I.I-OI PpU71TNQ ��_��__ �� -------��_�� ----- REVISIONS' 3•:5•O6 1•3•06 SITE PHOTOMETRICS PLAN I°. Im,.m„ LunIn ir.Odwdule \I� I4OJ•Otl,th Ov rpJh101Ott Sy/l'O oW labe1 An1,a' t Woos Ili LOD LLD D.,OIptl•R fowl Wltu No.lamp NMI l.. 11 M11iN0TWR W'6NYU 0ATAL0O NO IAI `•J I 6A 6P111.! U600 0100 0.16 01 hw•M]•11GMN•D.ealtM EIE* II►o,* M. 1 1160M AtT DTE*.M0A 116ATPO•POT TO'l 1300v.,0•bOL QIL VQfRR[.0 WTT D 1.300 Ell , i ,��/t'tY�\ 3 6C ...Li WM 0100 0.16 01 h1'+•M{•116rW.tl'D.cw.uw3 3 .3 blr $6 I I!6¢m CIK ATICMW.ARIA LGUTN9. O$TTWl I'4 A'.M'N 01 R'WT=!O DOT PM L010 S/•H)V\) 1 !D 6NOL! 0000 0131 0.16 C T hw•14.100ltNr1MA61.1O Ill Mo. 16 I 1000 nC D..W.L LGN1 6.•I06T TM I. 111100,417.003.1 CHI AMA.100%D'11 Mu LA`II A[MR�'vx R. [L a'•r iZa \ _ ■■ 2. ! . we.tl[wb [ ® 1 aos. NEW g 0 9 • ,' ,,:', $A ICY 11411.H11.1711 GARAGE 4 4 �� n4w[ a2i.2T2.na. PAY, ae1.222.YY22 eLon *MI• E'::I": BEDROOM w2 '•° n[evwcwrtaTat.eo[ rtOlerET vWET BPA �" i CLOS �[ Y!!! c W 1p•0 D • O/ ^ -. I Y GAMEROOMh4flRO [ u.mUNIT'C' _ C le BEDROOM KI . � Ilif 1"'—BATH#1 ED GARAGE - -: `.. A a T • SPA aw mew R{ I WALLI [{r•[MTKN WALL 11. i i'It:- J Pca 't P°:> d 1. • • • w,4r /"'w ' ' R �` NEW Q u'.rMI. ['wet. GARAGE ZJ N W �— „ft !II! Li C Q N:.I.BATHMI �o<w[eLnD STORAGE I I iTh I' CI'.en,m'•2.• c — i •�� BEDROOM ---� l°LJID+r•fi , , 1. 4. Ya DUI. +--r.,• EXISTING • LAUNDF El ' •• ■!. O (—�°`0' LNING � ! y ,Loon I_ - Q I r .,. - EXIS1ING ROOM 0 a: 9 rw KITCHEN P RM. -I r•.o• brwie.+r1age 4,droT.roi w Hq UNIT'A' " -' ---- EXISTING __ [de Pfl1510P15: 343.05 II•.,..-I • rAHR ELED j EXISTING j. s•3.05 I II , ENTRYPCRCH ' t ,_. , . ,�---'- }-' I_ V EXISTING CI DINING • LAUNDRY e• 1 '} r ,4,• a UNIT'B' ^ 'I, r� ). Y EXISTING 4 BATH FIRST FLOOR PLAN `I °� BEDROOM. 9 �,, 1/4"• I'•0" n'•]• J•r < C-*I 1® � to I oW 1 �Y - ■`� �. J I CLOSET 1 - O r 4 I Is SI CH MINK OPAAY ICY.M.AIM I ,•MASTER BATH 00 WOKI/+.rn.+lo+ KTCHEN rur. In.vs.Jnl p /AW Rw[ /frCTYR.COY Q Q UMT'C' • —rap // UNIT U IIEDROOM `TA - }' •'1m1� u A v. 3-BEDROOM .111.1 32,654 S.F.A/C �/'I ` II 2,400 SF.A/C M I LT b . U ., . MASTER Z Aril TO rrt rtQPr } BEDROOM p �r1'w'./' Chi um, LING I J gl J J RNOOM ^J OW OW ® �• �w DINING ,- -. II O !� 0•� i li I1.1 Y .Q' KITCHEN b '"' 'IF III a ... .., .. ...=A'.v .. ._ .. ` $ q b'•e• I m'•e• -_.ft.Yl !ME' y d mlwAnoNuuu b I QU \�1+I 111110 I erDRe Ir�l, j I -5 m PANTRY rFN—Ig g��,7 I Z J N I cc ZQ�o „ UNIT'A' L¢ORT L r ° Off II1I� - • I b I UNIT B rl I uvAenALT i��■ i •• r 4-BEDROOM e0INYm i�q=■. --- J y ral /� ,pSTAG 3,247 S.F.A/C IXINXIM _T 1 . EXISTINGIld1BEDROOMI__c LMNG • I MASTER R \j\�/(\�/\/ J. UNIT ' i BATH ; 4 DATE n.t oa J I I J PERMIT NO. CLOSET j ��•'•p'^y rEN90N5 EXISTING3-13.05 Nil 111111111 in 111 _ , WA BEDROOM 4 i..... e'•o•■ b MASTER //, , BEDROOM I i SECOND FLOOR PLAN •I, J P iilN�t4WR n [) J 0.. Pt r BfL��`i' NEW AERIAL,6MMOLIO ■■ 16�OP i0 MATCN IA A11 T 06 JJ ATN AyyGM RA KX.It SJNJ IMONE 301.171.7301 l'AT. 611.173.3723 BJBVCYKNITEMIt.COX I = o ♦ ROCMV9; - I L i ♦♦Y..K' MASTER n 9 I • .N Q BATH 1 a Acd l'•�' P t N.co� [ .% wa I BATH•3� _ z N �j ,?,,IN Ir—i' T = MASTER BEDROOM CX1 ♦ OM�RtlLLIO RT:?_ _ ,---_ TwTO- ,\ ♦ 1• I '/ T•_•- P�JiµO`i D1i6TanN I QD9 9 ...�� T' I UN P) ,�, i DATE II•I.04 - 1IIw, //�/� 11I - -M •- / PERMIT iJQ RBNSIONS ♦ 949•m6 6.9.64 I f: C4ITINO ABM6t1 ,. !� ..� /1 lir I lift BWMONO �� 1• M.OTCM PMA - w R THIRD FLOOR PLAN . ----E--- , 1,4. • I'-0R -- Al -f� ( 0C1 . rI IIIIIIII I I KW dIY M]L!D I TO N.TCN O.rR/ 6 fE +TM Ay,„,„0 T II IORGA7 DM IL 35453 PMOMC 511377.772I YA7. 551.272.3721 waORAOR7CNR.coM I _ I ,I I L. 1 at r 0 M yr ~ eNW TO55.4T 0MI0[D Ima TO n�.rc.+GierNa F L [O ..1..a F— - — --� �- a = M 0 NAV MPNAIU TC T . / . DATE II.I•mL __ PERMIT NO. _ J� � PENSIONS. 7.77.06 A A, esoe ,7 alL IO M TR10 AlALT , „_ AMMO AREA RI 4 IV ROOF PLAN /- /41/ . I�►� I/4M • 11_0" / 1 No..ALL 14.1ecC.41 MAMA eMLLII WALL OAVIS 44001,11..11ent ( C) ••' PAWED TO KAM., COLOR CP B.A.01,450. .1?)?••—5112r. 11 Kv.m..= MOM 74147Z.734)1 5144, 151.212.3723 dePNALT 6,III,GLE IIIERIMICLIRECIERE,C011 ROO'6TOTET1 Mr/ M 71, DECORATIVE WOO, E ACCENT TRIM 0 Z OECORATIvE WOOD IDEVOGET MP! 4 r'D2'34'.0. .01— DECOUTIvE RAPTER EXIDTA4 ASPI4ALT 1 4;4 TAILS(TYPJ 81.19.*LED ROCP v v v .,...-.,;.;-, __ z ix{TRIM AlOANO OFTNIN40 V., 00004.*10'---' "Hi f —7'' Df MR/ nau 4.13.11..1 CTRIREEE WV.P0A 6ILL (:) EXIITEE1 OVER cru WALL =*-, 'L' • I ALLIIIIEVIOLLSIRDRAIL ,_ 2 , • EWER ''''...''''''..'',,..s........„.........„1 •.r.l C.I _ ra,E1151..11, — •L'/f.w.1% --I- ............................593=0 .•• • . . ... • DECORATIVE ELL = ,,, .. • -. AARRALT DOISOLI LNDIER UNDO!(if R) = 1111 C I,, ai ,W1 It: PC•Ce 6Ttillaierrr) ,• ••• • •''.'•. !Ill 111111'...,.'" '• ..::.:.: _71 IMF;..,.., •,, • CTFISZCS 11.21.110 Pl. :.i.° .1,43 A.M.,1.4lri, -----= • a No .. % C3 ' '. '''. a • . . •.••, L• • • , • 1- .. . A6fIRALT 04.44:1LIED L.I.1›- COVERED WITT — - 11 1111: ..... . DECORATIVE Aursqun GATE WAR=ILNATT •< Z CL DECORATIVE CRACOW F-grMf•—:1 . ... 4- 111 .1:1.1101.11 - AP' . M g .....,.,rn 0 A.41,1104,I. .:•411M .N. l'•211:1-,C,-•••,. - /— 1, 111 "1 .4•••••• ••••••••••• Is .' •. ,. .. . • • •• joh4,6141. • __./ i=11=11.:I .,::. Ari.,Cw•I przort.vs :, 41"141.4 DECOIRATMI .. ALIPIR.1110.1ARDIE.AIL &WIWI GUARDRAIL EVITIYI ti 4 ',''' _. • ,., • k .1Ia ./. • -, _. Ave....VIER GRAPE k, .. — EL.e-Jor.i.00111.AAD) 1 Awl.WE.,cLRAPV 2 DECORATIVE ALLMINLIII 7EL(.0-I,f10.011.4:01.1 DICCIWIVII PRAO,Z1 SEUTTERD.,ITT., IROPTINS LINOOLI. CA.T.114PLACE CCHCRITO OMR*LV$11.4.40 FIN.01.1 I.W.01..110.4reD LAMS° Dart.1.0:00.6 TO KATO!EXIATINS EIDIN:1 TT/ EC,11.T.1 ONCGO SOUTH ELEVATION OVER CIN WALL oAre 114.04 PEAMIT NQ • (N.E.3rd STREET) REMSCANSI 1'-0' 3.23•00 0.3.06 ..Z a • NOTE,ALL MOMIG.4L eWRER pMELe!HALL NMDOA c r PANTED MO, \/ i COLOR OI WCDIWO. •iit' •■ 11 I6 f[ RN AVENUE OILf&r KM.rL 3SIet TMION[ iiblft.5J01 W. el1dtt,1IDt IECMILAeMICTef[.eON M O � �x10T TO ML.WALL — Z ill DCCCRATM[Ka0 O IP LONER DCGORATM WJOD ACCENT TAMS Q 1 IbLI•M U'I GUARDRAIL L UOT I 0 O NEW A AVALT MEWLED t ] 2. D tl tl CIL ry D D tl D ':.�RIRIiC tl tl ^ORAOCET �'[ � RQ:TO tuTCN txleTVkN Tlv[WOO wV.7(J POOP OTMTt,MTV txlerfl0 WINGVb �t 1=`�. SAW i 1 3 Q Q m al __I��`r DECORATE RArttR W r �. ` TAIL.Mr) 2cc .•RAIItD►TlGCC WO N J LLiiI! k = G }. III -- 1x OMMEN,MOM BILL m� �' • Lam! aIII�' III � =_• PM Eil�- I LT COVERED /MWItD ee%goDR •.• - - Y' ii11 ;,r 1I!i '��A•�+� oYl M+Atu IL.a.,°. 6,n vMe. -- -- - ---- - -........ Ih�U9ljq. ,b n � �_ e.Len+r L.� • �_ I MI I EL.b.•t. txRTno ITueeo oY[R IH�I�I',1 AVOW TO ILOTCN WOOD 1RAMO Y41 �... L DMTW O+LtI Will WLL �t III II II —7� \ I• • D[Cp4TM OR.CxIT Ire _ II _'_ _ ICI; III® ; .,, •:• L■ T tN RT IIN R.A �IlYI eL.f'•r Y A Exlei.W NIROOF t IffI III — • ® %'t \ tt• - INbM Rgl4N1. EL.r•t• _ •3�7 � E3.111111111111E M ra fN lgDOR DATE Il.l.mi $ATO rnrtN eRADI \ u.o.v.rue*AC-, u.',W.•!bee'AeL — VBIMIr 1.1�. REVISONS b00TG UMW* M Y�O EL.I.10'A'roM'A011 T 3. 13.06 !METRO ONDOLE bt OARC 0 MO.TR 055UCCO EYd'J 0006E MIT.) DCCOR.LTM KU'INN 6•)•OD NW LbMT FEMME, CET-N-T4ACt CGNCREtt EAST ELEVATION b•OCMDOTNDATTE0NO NARD'°°�" ' W°N"°'" TO Mt•OZ.N n,LMO ATLItp ettfl9ILDA HATNG[METINS I/8" rI'_0" N.E.7th AVENUE) NOV.Aid.A.IRMICa1. /WRBC PMN.I►!Nall Ravi 1EDOEU IYMEM ( 0 IO r MATG1 BP, y'"4 COLOR44311OMAY04 !` ► ■■ ill , if II OK 34EUL1 DELRAY ECU,IL 13411 PHONE 311.772.T7e1 EAT, 141.711.111E •CVIW1CIY1ECTUK.000 AMYLT ewwcle RCCP►TETm m►J OecCRAT Woo Accew TOW lid:A.660 II • q __ kC INIEN PL.A►L 7T•r `TM �- A^LCMYII.�U. EL 71'-r ^m ONRMANJ '3 II III _ 't' CeCC1lLTIN c _ .1" ,� ®_ _ _,�®_ C0 TRM• Z}' rT►J JJQ OI►MXT 4NA(OLLT '"r 1 _ ■. ♦ N _ ®® 00 COv{RiD Q1RTT ,'-r _ — ®1 HfJi. ::�:��:`�'��.�:. a ® _ _ .� O[CCR<TIEr Y!.. 1L. OIE;Id.T/TT►. *• T --7x CTrMM WCOW NL IININI;Id. I. 7M IMlbl R. EL F " .'�r. [L Ir-A' a7•MYW 0E2.011G11.1 g�� J. -\__ riv.carc R. 41feN{IEI !VI Qualm L .�V L wa• farm �. 7:" 3 .IE — _ ,-• I- — 25264 FLOOR !L.O'-0'MIN ADLJ /J •/ :•i aW FM.OR<Df J '•"_ f [` �• EL r-r!LW♦.J 4.M - MT6 6wtA 64M ,el.f-! .6.0066 oOL ► W/►TCO I►L El I•!e•►''YAM da L . TO KAN44 t011T2i3 )x CTPMEe 2120011►LL(T►J Or CTPMO►TRIM Oven CO TRIM A16300 ►TICCO M MaTG.. 0.4R1411 000122. C 2N2r.A RTIJ OATH 11.144 ex1020 CYOR GM.ROLL PERMIT NO NORTH ELEVATION SWLIo1RNxTUM4 REASONS p 3-73.06 6.3•0e I/8" a 1'-0" do . NOT4 ALL WARICAN eArrTER PANCi6 WALL ^ , WKIO NDEN PMTNEM ( `�/-'1y�J PANTED TO RATCN �� • 'y COLOR Q INELDNekE ADRLIALT ININOLE CULS•1►CM,SI. NI ROOT EMIR(TTPJ ERNE S11.E77.7301 SAX. 6E1.2713M D[C014TNE Woo ACCENT Met DICCRATM SILL M O MR WNDLW(TTPJ \\\l \ MALT ALT KI¢RGp LOWERED NWT S.RAINED VIREO OAND 1 AROWTO OPRuae ROOP a OTR1ARARAT �fRPJ ' . TALE DECOMIR,RAFTER O .,TIEAN RM IIIONf _ D[CMATM ORMOOT V[L.M'•o•(Mae'ADLJ //�� Z c! A T9.TIE OEMf - T1 ` •S•NION DEOORATIK FF 6L.61'.O• ALV1Nf1 eUAROMIL 111 lg. ® © DECOR6TM ORACKEi ov►RNANs�` - 11.®;.,'•''.:;." :.,.L� I I l' '• © .:. :a 1. : '.,: 6VEILRI NA I.00AIA • ° I:_ Ot/TOM• DCCORATIK RAFTER I— - CORNER.rnPJ 111.1 TAU'Tyr, d ExIST*R1 OMR/ d •;rl ''� _P'ALcaJT PL ^ b [L 71.6• sr OMR,.N,---.®l® ®IIII IIII = 0` B - - I- H x:1 a ` , IXRTFb 6n1CC0 OyER® .r .^ LLVOD PRAITED WALL®: 'r'f N LEM.PRIERS' \ ' r1 OU U .ice ®1666E166661= .DJ®: f11..1'. ' ,'• _[L.mi IL4, _ �_ t :'.' c III _ eNR IN.ti.� • ® �_ ®.� t.Z.t. IiSli'i ii t -MRN P011CN ,LrNI6NP4oR -- _ .. l { : � � 1 - EL 1•.►• Y YY 1 GL.O'•O'RA•'A►LJ PNt.FLOOR A. /��y 6NCCO TO rLTG1 ` CA6T.N•PLAC[CONCRETE EL�,•V••••(WNE A.6LJT AObtAGE 6LAR -/ D(�TRM AR�'TAd) DECd4TM ALIRIMM Y GL.!•,p.••rm/['ADLJ ryCTTe66111P1 OVER OARAO[POOR C}fY•R156 ewrteRe.(Err, ENI►TNA ONR OAtLL WALL IT[RE 6U OW=Mbl TO Tx CTPfl60 ENDOW BILL HATCH ExroT6b WEST ELEVATION DATP 11.1.04 F6tHAAfTNOONS' RE` 1/4" • 1'-0" 9^23•06 O-e-OO MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA MEETING DATE: May 4, 2005 LOCATION: City Commission Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Francisco Perez-Azua, Maura Dersh, Jeffrey Silberstein, John Miller, Jr., Linda Lake, Randee Schatz, and Michelle Reich MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Warren Adams, Terrill Barton, and Denise Valek I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Perez at 6:00 p.m. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. No one from the Public addressed the Board on non-agenda items. Chairman Perez read a summary of the Quasi-Judicial Hearing procedures. The Notary swore in individuals for testimony. II. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS A. 98 NW 5th Avenue, West Settlers Historic District, Zarus Wright, Agent Item Before the Board: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the replacement of an existing gray tile roof with a tan shingle roof. (Quasi-Judicial Hearing). Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. There were none. Mr. Adams entered the project file into the record. The subject property consists of the north 50 feet of the east 135 feet of Block 20, Town of Delray and is located on the southwest corner of NW 5th Avenue and NW 1st Street. The two story apartment building was built in 1972 in a modern style and is of CBS construction with a flat cement tile roof. The 7,076 square foot structure contains garages on the first floor and apartments on the second floor, and is a non-contributing structure within the West Settlers Historic District. The property is currently zoned Central Business District (CBD). There have been no recent Board or administrative actions pertaining to this property. The current proposal is for the replacement of the existing gray cement roof tiles with tan dimensional asphalt shingles. While re-roofing utilizing similar materials associated with Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 4, 2005 repair or replacement is typically reviewed and approved administratively, the replacement of a roof with new materials requires Board approval. The current proposal is for the replacement of the gray roof tiles with tan colored dimensional asphalt shingles. The Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards state that the removal of historic materials should be avoided and that, if features have to be removed completely, the new features should match the old in design, color, texture, other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. In this case the tiles will be completely removed and replaced with shingles which are not a match in terms of design, color, texture or materials. However, the structure is 33 years old, is a non-contributing building, and requires roof repairs. The shingles do not match the tiles; however, the proposal can be approved as shingles are an appropriate roof covering for buildings of this age and style. As the proposed roof material will consist of dimensional shingles rather than flat shingles, the proposed changes can be supported. Also, there are many other buildings within the West Settlers Historic District with shingle roofs, therefore, the proposal is in accordance with LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8) which states that all improvements to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a historic district shall be visually compatible. Based on the above analysis, therefore, positive findings can be made with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), and 4.5.1(E)(8), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing. It was moved by Mr. Silberstein, seconded by Ms. Schatz, and approved 6 to 0 (Ms. Dersh arrived late) to move approval of the COA for 98 NW 5th Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(H), 4.5.1(E)(4), and 4.5.1(E)(8) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. B. 134 NE 1st Avenue, Old School Square Historic Arts District, Robert Currie, Owner Item Before the Board: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the replacement of an existing wood picket fence with a new vinyl picket fence. (Quasi- Judicial Hearing). Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. There were none. Mr. Adams entered the project file into the record. The subject property consists of Lot 12 (Less the East 5 Feet of NE 1st Avenue Right-of-Way), Block 67, Town of Delray and is located on the west side of NE 1st Avenue, between NE 1st Street and NE 2nd Street. The single story structure was built in 1935 in the Vernacular style, and is typical of the many small cottages built for use as winter homes during the 1930s. The building is a 2 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 4, 2005 contributing structure within the Old School Square Historic District and is zoned OSSHAD (Old School Square Historic Arts District). In November, 1994, the Historic Preservation Board approved, subject to conditions, the Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Design Elements associated with a mixed-use development consisting of offices and a residence. The proposal included the conversion of the 736 square foot historic structure to offices; an 847 square foot office addition and a 449 square foot apartment; the addition of 6 parking spaces; and, associated landscaping. An associated waiver to allow parking in the front yard was also approved. In December, 1994, the City Commission approved an associated waiver to reduce the required five (5)foot perimeter landscape area to two (2) feet. In March, 2005, administrative approval was given for the replacement of the roof shingles. The current proposal is for the replacement of the existing 2.5' high wood picket fence with a new 3' high white vinyl picket fence along the east side (front) of the property and the east 17.5' (approximately) of the north property line. Fences, walls, and gates are typically reviewed and approved administratively; however, the proposal involves the introduction of a modern material and Board approval is required. The current proposal is for the replacement of the existing wood picket fence with a new white vinyl picket fence. As the photographs show, the extant wood fence is in poor condition. In accordance with the Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards, the existing fence should be retained and repaired as necessary through the replacement of those pickets and rails which have deteriorated badly. If the fence is beyond repair, it should be replaced with a new fence which matches the existing in terms of design, color, texture, other visual qualities, and material. The current proposal is for the replacement of the fence along the front (east) boundary of the property and for partial replacement along the north boundary, both of which are visible from the public right-of-way. During a survey of the other properties in this section of NE 1st Avenue, it was noted that, in all cases where a property has a boundary fence, they are made of wood. LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8) states that all improvements to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. A vinyl fence is not an appropriate addition to a building of this style and age, especially when the structure is contributing. It has been argued that vinyl fences require less maintenance than wood fences, that they retain their appearance for longer, and that they last longer. While it is true they require less maintenance, they can be susceptible to yellowing and cracking and, as they are a relatively new innovation, there is no proof as to how long they will last. If a wood fence is properly maintained and painted regularly, it can last 50 years or more depending on the type of wood used, where it is installed, and whether or not it has been treated with a preservative to help resist decay, fungi and insects. The Design Guidelines state that new materials, some of them synthetic, may be approved on a case-by-case basis; however, it is_recommended that vinyl fences are only approved for locations where they cannot be viewed from the public right-of-way or where their location makes maintenance difficult. Approving the installation of a vinyl fence where it can be viewed from the public right-of-way could set a precedent and lead to a flood of similar applications. 3 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 4, 2005 On September 5, 2001, a COA was submitted for Board approval for the installation of a vinyl fence at 1104 Nassau Street, a contributing property in the Nassau Street Historic District. The COA was continued until the Board meeting of September 19, 2001 to allow the Board to view a sample of the proposed fencing prior to making a decision. Board approval was given; however, in this case, the fence was located at the farthermost portion of the property, away from the view of other property owners and public rights-of- way, in an area that was heavily landscaped. The portion of the fence facing Nassau Street was constructed of wood, thus maintaining the desired appearance where visible. Based on the above analysis, therefore, positive findings cannot be made with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Mr. Jose Aguila, Architect with Currie, Sowards, Aguila Architects, advised they are withdrawing their Certificate of Appropriateness and will be installing wood fencing. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing. III. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS A. The Sewell C. Biggs House (212 Seabreeze Avenue), Erskine Courtenay, Owner Item Before the Board: Consideration of the designation of an individually listed property in the Local Register of Historic Places and set a date for the Public Hearing. Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. Ms. Lake advised she spoke with Virginia Courtney that she was going to undertake this. Mr. Adams advised the owner has proposed to designate the subject property to the Local Register of Historic Places and has employed the services of Dorothy W. Patterson to undertake the research and prepare the designation report. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(1), to qualify as a historic site the property must fulfill one or more of the criteria set forth in LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(2) and/or (3). The designation report contains, at minimum, sufficient information to meet the criteria stated in both LDR Sections 4.5.1(B)(2) and (3). The criteria are as follows: LDR Section 4.5.1(B) (2): (a) Is associated in a significant way with the life or activities of a major person important in city, state, or national history (for example, the homestead of a local founding family); (b) Is the site of a historic event with significant effect upon the city, state, or nation; (c) Is associated in a significant way with a major historic event, whether cultural, economic, social, military, or political; 4 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 4, 2005 (d) Exemplifies the historical, political, cultural, economic, or social trends of the community in history; or (e) Is associated in a significant way with a past or continuing institution which has contributed substantially to the life of the city. LDR Section 4.5.1(B) (3): (a) Portrays the environment in an era of history characterized by one or more distinctive architectural styles; and, (b) Embodies those distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, period, or method of construction; (c) Is a historic or outstanding work of a prominent architect, designer, landscape architect, or builder; or (d) Contains elements of design, detail, material, or craftsmanship of outstanding quality or which represented, in its time, a significant innovation or adaptation to the South Florida environment. The designation report demonstrates that the subject property qualifies as a historic site as it: is associated in a significant way with the life or activities of a major person important in city, state, or national history [LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(2)(a)]; embodies those distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, period, or method of construction [LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(3)(b)]; is a historic or outstanding work of a prominent architect, designer, landscape architect, or builder [LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(3)(c)]; and contains elements of design, detail, material, or craftsmanship of outstanding quality or which represented, in its time, a significant innovation or adaptation to the South Florida environment [LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(3)(d)]. Sewell C. Biggs, a northern Delaware native, graduated from the University of Delaware in 1938. He also attended the University of Virginia Law School, and studied architecture at Harvard, Oxford, and Cambridge Universities. He became a serious collector of 18th and 19th-century American art and, in 1988, the Biggs Museum of American Art opened in Dover to house his collection. The 14 galleries of the museum contain a collection which covers more than 200 years of American art and decorative art gems. That same year, Biggs established the Sewell C. Biggs Chair in American Art History at the University of Delaware. The architect of the Sewell C. Biggs House, Paul Rudolph, was an important influence on American Modernism in the mid-twentieth century. According to C. Ford Peatross, curator of Architecture, Design, and Engineering at the Library of Congress, "Paul Rudolph was a profound influence on the second half of the 20th century and a model of rare integrity who is being rediscovered by a new generation". Christopher Domin and Joseph King, authors of 'Paul Rudolph, The Florida Houses', state that "The Florida houses are an accessible entry into a formidable career. His work is a compelling example of regionally inspired modernism'. The design of the house portrays a significant example of the modernism which swept through the state in the years after World War II which embodies the characteristics of mid-century modernism, the innovative uses of new materials, and adaptation to suit the South Florida environment. 5 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 4, 2005 Paul Rudolph's design was constructed by the Sinks, father and son, who had a long record of building in Delray Beach. The elder Sinks built many of the structures on or near Atlantic Avenue such as the Masonic Building, the 1926 High School, the Wuepper Building, the Casa del Ray Hotel, and the Arcade Building. The Sewell C. Biggs House is associated with an original owner who was important in preserving, conserving, and promoting American fine and decorative arts. The style of the home is a design unique to Delray Beach and is the artistic work of an architect who was a leader in the 20th-century American design field. It is also the only Paul Rudolph designed building in Delray Beach (although Rudolph designed many Florida homes and buildings) and is representative of 20th-century regional modernism tailored for the Florida environment. Further, the house is an example of the skill of the Sinks construction firm which built some of the best surviving historic buildings in Delray Beach. Designating this site as historic will help preserve the character of the extant historic dwelling and will promote the preservation of other surrounding historic properties. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(C) (4), after formally reviewing the designation report, the Board shall set a public hearing date for the proposed designation. Mr. Jose Aguila, Architect with Currie, Sowards, Aguila Architects, representing the owner advised he was familiar with the property and would like to see it placed in the Local Register of Historic Places. Ms. Lake mentioned as this home is contemporary and does not fall on the preferred list. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing. It was moved by Mr. Miller, seconded by Ms. Dersh, and approved 7 to 0 to move to set a date for the required public hearing associated with the proposed historic designation of The Sewell C. Biggs House (212 Seabreeze Avenue) for the Historic Preservation Board meeting of May 18, 2005. B. The Plastridge House (19 NE 10th Street), Clemmer Mayhew, Agent Consideration of the designation of an individually listed property in the Local Register of Historic Places and set a date for the Public Hearing. The owner has proposed to designate the subject property to the Local Register of Historic Places and has employed the services of Clemmer Mayhew to undertake the research and prepare the designation report. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(1), to qualify as a historic site the property must fulfill one or more of the criteria set forth in LDR Section 4.5.1(6)(2) and/or (3). The designation report contains, at minimum, sufficient information to meet the criteria stated in LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(3). The criteria are as follows: 6 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 4, 2005 LDR Section 4.5.1(B) (2): (a) Is associated in a significant way with the life or activities of a major person important in city, state, or national history (for example, the homestead of a local founding family); (b) Is the site of a historic event with significant effect upon the city, state, or nation; (c) Is associated in a significant way with a major historic event, whether cultural, economic, social, military, or political; (d) Exemplifies the historical, political, cultural, economic, or social trends of the community in history; or (e) Is associated in a significant way with a past or continuing institution which has contributed substantially to the life of the city. LDR Section 4.5.1(B) (3): (a) Portrays the environment in an era of history characterized by one or more distinctive architectural styles; and, (b) Embodies those distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, period, or method of construction; (c) Is a historic or outstanding work of a prominent architect, designer, landscape architect, or builder; or (d) Contains elements of design, detail, material, or craftsmanship of outstanding quality or which represented, in its time, a significant innovation or adaptation to the South Florida environment. The designation report demonstrates that the subject property qualifies as a historic site as it: portrays the environment in an era of history characterized by one or more distinctive architectural styles [LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(3)(a)]; embodies those distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style, period, or method of construction [LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(3)(b)]; and contains elements of design, detail, material, or craftsmanship of outstanding quality or which represented, in its time, a significant innovation or adaptation to the South Florida environment[LDR Section 4.5.1(B)(3)(d)]. The Plastridge House is a good example of a one-story Frame Vernacular House which was built during the pre-World War I era, c.1905-1915, which exemplifies a specific historical and cultural period that is rapidly vanishing from the South Florida landscape. Frame Vernacular buildings from this era define the character of the earliest settlers and serve as historical reminders of one of the century's significant periods of development. The box-like configuration is clad with weatherboard and topped with a pyramidal roof, the steep geometric lines of which resist hurricane winds and tropical heat. These plain, functional houses were often purchased from pattern books with simplistic design elements from this era. The house was manufactured and shipped in pieces to the owner who would employ local craftsmen to assemble the house and add distinctive details. 7 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 4, 2005 The property has been altered from its original one bedroom, one bathroom layout. In 1947, a bedroom and bathroom were added and the front corner porch has been enclosed. Although in need of repair, the structure has retained its integrity and charm and is one of only approximately ten pre-World War I structures with pyramidal roofs that remain in the area. Designating this site as historic will help preserve the character of the extant historic dwelling, will promote the preservation of other surrounding historic properties, and will help broaden the public's perception of historic preservation and educate them about a significant historical period of the City's development. The property consists of Lot 24 & Lot 25, Block 7, Dell Park Subdivision which are currently joined by a Unity of Title. If historic designation is approved, a waiver will be requested from the Historic Preservation Board to allow the construction of a single family home on Lot 24, pursuant to LDR Section4.1.4(C). Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(C) (4), after formally reviewing the designation report, the Board shall set a public hearing date for the proposed designation. Mr. Clemmer Mayhew, representing the owner of the property, advised as part of the designation report and as a condition of designation there be no impact and the Board finding special circumstances to assist because of the nature and character that Lot 24 would be designated a buildable lot of record. No historic house should be left behind. The owner wants to make it very clear that he needs to be able to sell the lot in order to restore the house. He will live in the cottage and restore it. Lot 24 was not part of this parcel, and tried to clarify the importance of no infill construction. Mr. Mayhew passed out color photographs. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Mr. Adams advised there was a problem in the historic area if two lots are under the same ownership, and one can be classed as not buildable. A waiver request has not been submitted. I do not think the Board can guarantee granting a waiver because it has become designated, and this issue cannot be discussed at this time. Terrill Barton, Assistant City Attorney, agreed that this issue should not be discussed. Ms. Schatz requested an explanation regarding the Unity of Title. Mr. Adams advised if it is not historic, the Board cannot consider the waiver. Ms. Barton advised we have to address each item individually, and a Unity of Title is filed by the County The Board does not have the power to do this. You must contact someone in the Public Records Office to find out the procedure. It is not addressed by the Board. Mr. Adams advised that in some cases you might have a lot that has the required frontage. In the historic district several of the lots may be nonconforming. Mr. Silberstein advised that if it is designated historic, the Board can review a waiver request. However, this house is not within the historic district. He inquired if the two lots were going to be separated. 8 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 4, 2005 Mr. Mayhew advised that paragraph C. of the designation procedures within the Designation Report states you may replace or compliment. The waiver is for properties that are not designated. Paragraph C.3.b states you can write in a designation report, etc. with regard to but not limited to. The waiver is something else entirely. There has been a history of the Historic Preservation Board granting these in the past. Ms. Schatz inquired if they wanted the historic designation on the entire parcel. Mr. Mayhew advised as part of the designation report, Lot 24 has a historical buildable lot. Ms. Schatz advised in order to sell the lot you have to terminate the Unity of Title. Mr. Mayhew advised they spoke to the tax office and if it was sold it would be given a new control number. Chairman Perez advised the only thing the Board could do was to designate the property historic. Ms. Barton inquired if he wanted the City to approve this with a condition. Mr. Silberstein advised he is prepared to approve the designation of the house as historic, however, we cannot approve the empty lot. Mr. Mayhew advised that the Board has granted a waiver in the past. Ms. Barton advised you cannot make any guarantees on the waiver until it is submitted, as the City's code has changed since 1989. This Board does not have the authority to approve a waiver. A Unity of Title would have to be approved by the Planning and Zoning Board, and at this point it is premature. Mr. Silberstein advised if you want to pursue this you would need to come in with a design proposal for the Board. Ms. Barton advised the applicant would have to go to the Planning and Zoning Board and after the house was designated historic it would have to come back to the Historic Preservation Board. Chairman Perez advised Mr. Mayhew that Mr. Adams would speak to the Planning and Zoning Director regarding this issue. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing. It was moved by Mr. Silberstein, seconded by Ms. Schatz, and passed 7 to 0 to move to postpone and discuss with the Planning and Zoning Department the required public hearin9q associated with the proposed historic designation of The Plastridge House (19 NE 10 Street)for the Historic Preservation Board meeting of May 18, 2005. 9 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 4, 2005 C. La France Hotel (140 NW 4th Avenue), Delray Beach CRA, Owner Recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Board on an LDR amendment to allow Senior Housing as a Conditional Use, rezoning from R-1-A (Single Family Residential) to CF (Community Facilities), and associated Conditional Use Request to establish a Senior Housing Facility at the former La France Hotel (140 NW 4th Avenue). The item before the Board is that of making a recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Board on an LDR amendment to allow Senior Housing as a Conditional Use within the proposed CF (Community Facilities) zoning district, rezoning from R-1-A (Single Family Residential) to CF (Community Facilities), and associated Conditional Use Request to establish a Senior Housing Facility at the former La France Hotel (140 NW 4th Avenue), pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(D). Since the property is located in the West Settlers Historic District, the Historic Preservation Board is being asked at this time to make a recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Board. The proposed rezoning involves one property totaling 0.36 acres within the West Settlers Historic District. The property is located on the west side of NW 4th Avenue, approximately 100 feet south of Martin Luther King Jr. Drive (NW 2nd Street). The property consists of a Portion of Lot 8, and Lots 9 and 10, Block 27, Replat of a Portion of Lot 27, Town of Linton (Delray). The property contains the 4,028 square foot (16 rooms/units) former La France Hotel. The two-story structure was built in 1947 in the Masonry Vernacular style and is considered a contributing building within the West Settlers Historic District. The development proposal is to alter the extant historic building and construct an addition to provide a Senior Housing Facility which will offer affordable housing units for residents of 60 years and older. A rezoning from R-1-A (Single Family Residential) to CF (Community Facilities) is also requested. The applicant (CRA) has stated that the rezoning is required as there has been a change in circumstance which makes the current zoning inappropriate. There is a need for affordable housing for the senior residents of Delray Beach who cannot afford market rate housing at their current income level. Also, there has been a change of ownership of the property from a private individual to a government agency (CRA) which has made a commitment to the community to preserve the historic structure and adapt it for re-use as a Senior Housing Facility. The most appropriate use for a building is the use for which it was first built; however, this is not always an affordable or sustainable option. When a new use has to be found for a historic building, the new use should be both appropriate and sustainable. In this case, the building will continue to be used as an accommodation and only minor internal alterations of the extant historic building will be required. As there is a need for this form of housing and the proposal has the backing of a government agency, it is anticipated that the proposed use will be sustainable, ensuring the future protection and maintenance of the historic structure. The proposal, therefore, can be regarded as an appropriate and sustainable new use for the former La France Hotel. 10 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 4, 2005 Ms. Thuy Shutt, Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA), advised she would like the Board to make one consideration regarding the LDR. In attempting to preserve the stucco walls we have found out that some of the rooms on the first floor will not meet the recommended square footage. We would like a 35% reduction because this would change the integrity of the existing building. We do not want to take away the corridor. Chairman Perez inquired if they were individual rooms at this point. Ms. Shutt advised there are sixteen rooms without bathroom facilities and four units share a bathroom. We would like each room to have a private bathroom and kitchenette. We cannot move the walls in the building. We are also asking for the Planning and Zoning Board approval to change the minimum room size. The architect enlarged the room to 350 square feet, but it will cut into the hallway and we would have to move the structural walls. Ms. Shutt also advised they will have to apply for site plan approval, and then submit a waiver. Ms. Barton, Assistant City Attorney, advised that the density is consistent with the other facilities we have in the community. This is consistent with the Adult Congregate Living Facilities (ACLF) guidelines regarding density and room size. The Historic Preservation Board can only recommend a reduction in size, and then it has to go before the Planning and Zoning Board. It was moved by Mr. Silberstein, seconded by Ms. Dersh, and approved 7 to 0 to move a recommendation of approval to the Planning and Zoning Board for the LDR amendment to allow Senior Housing as a Conditional Use within the CF (Community Facilities) zoning district, rezoning from R-1-A (Single Family Residential) to CF (Community Facilities) to allow the Historic Preservation Board to recommend the change in the minimum size requirements of the rooms, and the associated Conditional Use Request to establish a Senior Housing Facility at the former La France Hotel (140 NW 4th Avenue). V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments: Mr. Andy Katz, 220 South Ocean Boulevard, thanked the members of the Board as well as staff for their hard work. Historic preservation adds to our quality of life. In the next few months you will be getting three different COA's for demolition. I would like to request that you keep the best interest of Delray Beach in mind and maintain the charm. B. Report from Historic District Representatives: None C. Board Members: Chairman Perez advised at a later date we can start looking at our design guidelines and what issues can be approved administratively. We should put this on the agenda some time in the future. - Mr. Silberstein advised fence issues should be black and white (no grey area). 11 Historic Preservation Board Minutes May 4, 2005 Chairman Perez advised we have to take into account where the house is located regarding fences, shutters, etc. D. Staff: Mr. Adams advised we are considering coming up with ways where demolition will not be as attractive as it has been in the past. Maybe we should allow them a coverage area of more than 40% and increase the cost of the application fee. If you have any ideas regarding this I would like to hear them. I am attending a seminar in Coral Gables and will be meeting with other Planners. VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Board made a motion to adjourn at 7:30 p.m. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for May 4, 2005 and was formally adopted and approved by the Board on June 1 2005. D nise A. Valek If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. 12 DELRL O BEACH F AY R I D A All-America City 111 1993 2001 SIGN IN SHEET 2001 Regular Historic Preservation Board Meeting REGULAR MEETING May 18, 2005 PRINT FULL NAME ADDRESS OR ITEM NO. ORGANIZATION (2'1Eop-c)(<-- 1-1• i t 4)\c. r -- I 09/20/2004 MON 16:24 FAX 561 279 4884 RSI a004/007 Walker Engineering,Inc. Evaluation Calculations 25-7584 December 25-7804b-8 1996 25-7804 4&5 25-7848-6 Walker Engineering,Inc. Evaluation Caleulationf 25-7183 March 1995 Walker Engineering,Inc. Bval cation Calculation) Aerodynamic Multipliers April 1999 Walker Engineering,Inc. Calculations Two Patty Adhesive Set System April 1999 3. LIMITATIONS 3.1 Fire classification is notipart of this acceptance. 32 For mortar or adhesivee set tile applications,a static field uplift test shall be prrforsned in accordance with RAS 106, 3.3 Applicant shall retain the services of a Mani-Dade County Certified Laboratory to perform • quarterly test in accordance with TAS 112,appendix'A'.Such testing shall be submitted to the Building Code Compliance Office for review. 3.4 Minimum underlaymexvt shall be in compliance with The applicable Roofing Applications Standards listed section 4.1 herein. 3.5 30/90 hot mopped underlayme nt applications may be installed perpendicular to the roof slope unless stated otherwise by the undorlayment material manufacturers published literalize. 3.6 This acceptance is for wood deck applications. Minimum deck requirements shall be in compliance with applicablc building code 4. INSTALLATION 4.1 Monier Lifetile Flat Shake&Slate,Sierra Shake&Super Shake",and Colonial Slate& Shingle Blend Concrete Roof Tile and its components shall be installed in strict compliance with Roofing Application Standard RAS: 18,RAS 119,and RAS 120. 4.2 Data For Attachment Calculations Table 1: Average Weight fif)an lmensions 0 x w) Tile Profile Weight IN Length-!(ft} 1Nidth.w(ft} Clic)P16P Monier t ifet�e Shako&Slate Tile -'�'1#f 1.38 t08 Monier Ufelile Sierra Shake && 11.E --._._-' 1 A2 1.03 Super Shaken',end Colonial State &Shingle Blend Tile Table 2: Aerodynam a Multipliers•A.(ft) Tile A.( ) L(ft) i Profile atten Ajrplicatlon Direct Deck Application Monier Lif et@c Shako a Slate,Sierra Simko'& 0.287 0.289 Super Shaken'.and Colonial Stale&Shingle Blend Tire ,II... NOA No.:02-12 6 i..- Expiration Date:12/16/07 1.-.: Approval Dater 01102103 .;t:, Pope 4 of 7 !' • 3. LIMITATIONS 3.1 Fire classification is not part of this acceptance. 3.2 For mortar or adhesive set tile applications, a ...atic field uplift test shall be performed in accordance with RAS 106_ 3 3 Applicant shall retain the services ofSa Miami-Dade P '�CountyCertified stingy shall be submitted to tory to perform quarterly test in accordance with"1 A P the Building Code Compliance Office for review 3.4 Minimum underlayment shall be in compliance with the applicable Roofing1►cations Applications Standards listed section 4.1 herr in-applications In: y be installed perpendicular to the roof slope 3.S 30/90 hot mopped underlaymen= unless stated otherwise by the u:tderlayment ma trial manufacturers published literature. 3.6 This acceptance is for wood deck applicationL. Minimum deck requirements shall be in compliance with applicable bui ding code_ 4. INSTALLATION 4.t Monier Lifetile Villa, Roll, arid Capri Cone A,etc licaRtton Standard its RAS�rlgonRAS shall 119,l be and installed in strict compliance with Roofing -p RAS 120- 4 2 Data For Attachment Calculati ins 46. -_ Table 1: Auerage Weight(W) and Dimensions (l x w ) JO_ Tile Profile Weight-V1r . ;f) Length-t (ft) Width-w (ft) �� ttJ________:_,-- AV 1.33 1.0F3 .. 1.08 Monier Lifetile Villa and Roli Tile 9.51 1.33 03 -- -_------- TableMonier Lifetile Capri Tile 2: Aa_rodynamic 111,1 tiptiers - A ft1 Tile Profile Batten A) lication Direct Dec A licat on Monier Lifetile Villa, Rol-and Capri Tile fl:.67 Table 3: Restori:n Moments di.a to Gravity - Mdft-lbf) 7".12" or 4":t2" 5 :12" 6 :12' Tile 3'�="t 2.agreater profilerect (Monier Lifetile Battens'Direct Battens Direct Deck Batters DDirre k ecct Battens Deck Battens i ck_ Villa, Roll, and Deck ICapri Tile 5.57 6.30 ; 5.48 6.18 L 5.37 , 6.05 5.24 l 5 90 5.09 5.73 h.�;, . v..„. NOA No.:02-1205.05 Expiration Date: 12/16/07 Approval Date:41I02103 • -r 0 Page 4of7 DELRAY BEACH F L O R 1 O A All-America City 11111 r 1993 2001 SIGN IN SHEET 2001 Regular Historic Preservation Board Meeting REGULAR MEETING June 1, 2005 PRINT FULL NAME ADDRESS OR ITEM NO. ORGANIZATION �� 49 rim 'PC )1 50 ,4, effiliA/1 J✓oTcy)lsaN 1ci Jr20&& pf- j°4 ke-e leal,c. I- 2S -2 r S 06 , _ ��