Loading...
HPB 04-20-05 .c,4 qt. AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING °��= P CITY OF DELRAY BEACH 4y la, Meeting Date: April 20, 2005 Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting Location: City Commission Chambers Time: 6:00 P.M. The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service,program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Randolph at 243-7127(voice), or 243-7199(TDD), 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing,such persons will need a record of these proceedings,and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Two or more City Commissioners may be in attendance. I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • April 6, 2005 III. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. 220 NW 2nd Street, West Settlers Historic District, Dennis Thompson, Agent Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the replacement of existing windows and the installation of storm protection. B. 238-240 NE 5th Terrace, Del-Ida Park Historic District, Tullia Taylor Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the replacement of existing windows. C. Lot 3 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District, Peter Dwyer, Agent Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of a single family residence. D. House of Vintage, 123 South Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Jeffery Silberstein Architect&Assoc., Inc., Agent Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class V site plan, landscape plan, design elements, and a waiver request for a residential extension to a commercial property. IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Historic Preservation Poster Contest V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS • Public Comments • Reports from Historic District Representatives • Board Members • Staff VI. ADJOURN )110 otu Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner Posted on April 14, 2005 OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA MEETING DATE: April 20, 2005 LOCATION: City Commission Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Francisco Perez-Azua, Maura Dersh, Jeffrey Silberstein, and Michelle Reich MEMBERS ABSENT: John Miller, Jr., and Linda Lake STAFF PRESENT: Warren Adams, Brian Shutt, and Denise Valek I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Perez at 6:00 p.m. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. No one from the Public addressed the Board on non-agenda items. Chairman Perez read a summary of the Quasi-Judicial Hearing procedures. The Notary swore in individuals for testimony. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Mr. Silberstein, seconded by Ms. Dersh, and passed 5 to 0 to approve the Minutes of April 6, 2005 as written. III. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS A. 220 NW 2'd Street, West Settlers Historic District, Dennis Thompson, Agent Item Before the Board: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the replacement of existing windows and the installation of storm protection. (Quasi- Judicial Hearing). Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. Mr. Adams entered the project file into the record. The subject property consists of the west 75' of Lot 1 and the west 75' of the north 23.5' of Lot 2, Block 43, Town of Delray, and is located on the southeast corner of Martin Luther King Jr. Drive (NW 2"d Street) and NW 3`d Avenue. The 1,766 square foot single family dwelling was built in 1948 in the Minimal Traditional style and is of wood frame construction with vinyl siding. The structure is considered a contributing building within the West Settlers Historic District and is currently zoned Single Family Residential (R-1-A). There are no recent administrative or Board actions pertaining to this property. Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 20, 2005 The current proposal is for the replacement of existing aluminum framed awning windows with 6 over 6, single hung aluminum framed windows and the installation of removable hurricane panels. The following is suggested by the Delray Beach Design Guidelines regarding: Windows: Design and install new windows when the historic windows are completely missing. Changing the historic appearance through inappropriate design materials or adding a finish or color that changes the sash, depth of reveal, the reflectivity, or the appearance of the frame should be avoided. Replacing viable windows rather than maintaining the original should be avoided. Shutters: Window shutters that are removable are preferred. If the tracks are to be installed year-round, they should be painted to match the exterior surface. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation suggest the following: The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. The proposed replacement windows and storm protection are part of an overall repair scheme of the building which is being jointly funded by the City of Delray Beach and the Community Redevelopment Agency. The applicant proposes the replacement of all the windows in the house except the ground floor windows on the front facade as they were replaced a number of years ago. A COA application for their replacement could not be found. The existing aluminum framed awning windows are not the original windows and their design is inappropriate for this style of building. While there is no evidence to show the design of the original windows, the proposed 6 over 6 single hung windows are in keeping with this style of dwelling and period of construction. Although wood is the most appropriate material for the proposed windows, the installation of aluminum frame windows can be supported as the original windows do not exist on the building and the installation of a more appropriate design will improve the appearance of the dwelling. It is essential that the depth and profile of the muntins are consistent with the profile that is normally provided with a wood framed window, therefore, a condition of approval is that a muntin profile is submitted which provides the appropriate depth and profile. 3 • Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 20, 2005 The applicant has not stated the proposed color of the new window frames or whether clear glass is to be used. A further condition of approval is that clear glass is installed in the windows. Although the tripartite windows on the ground floor of the front facade were replaced in the past and are in good condition, the applicant should consider replacing the central sections with 6 over 6 single hung aluminum frame windows and the four sidelight windows with casement windows of an appropriate design. The installation of the proposed removable storm panels can be supported as they are the least obtrusive form of storm protection and conform to the recommendations of the Design Guidelines. As the tracks require minimal hardware, there is little concern that the installation could irreparably damage the exterior of the building. However, in order to camouflage the tracks, a condition of approval has been added to paint the tracks to match the color of the building. Based on the analysis above, positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8)(c) and (g), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation can be made, subject to the above conditions. Mr. Adams advised the applicant is not present, and he did not bring the window in for review. Mr. Silberstein advised he agrees with staffs recommendation. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing. It was moved by Ms. Dersh, seconded by Ms. Schatz, and passed 5 to 0 to move approval of the COA for 220 NW 2nd Street by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and (c) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: 1. That a muntin profile is submitted which provides the appropriate depth and profile that is provided with a wood framed window. 2. That clear glass is installed in the windows. 3. That the tracks for the removable storm panels are painted to match the color of the buildingq. B. 238-240 NE 5 Terrace Del-Ida Park Historic District, Tullia Taylor Item Before the Board: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the replacement of existing windows (Quasi-Judicial Hearing). 4 Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 20, 2005 Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. Mr. Adams entered the project file into the record. The subject property consists of Lot 14, Block 9, Del-Ida Park, and is located on the southwest corner of NE 5th Terrace and NE 3rd Avenue. The 1,404 square foot duplex was built in 1954 in the Masonry Vernacular style and is of CBS construction. The structure is situated within the Del- Ida Park Historic District and is currently zoned Low Density Residential (RL). The building is currently classed as non-contributing; however, the 1991 survey states: "This building is associated with the developmental history and exhibits the architectural elements of the Del-Ida Park area during the 1950's. Due to its historical and architectural significance, this building could contribute to the locally listed Del-Ida Park Historic District when the historic district is re-evaluated and the period of significance is expanded to include later historic resources". There are no recent administrative or Board actions pertaining to this property. The current proposal is for the replacement of the existing jalousie windows with 1 over 1 single hung aluminum framed windows with impact resistant glass. The following is suggested by the Delray Beach Design Guidelines regarding: Windows: Retain distinctive windows which feature a sash, muntins, glazing, sills, heads, hood molds, paneled, or decorative doors jambs and moldings and shutters and blinds. Changing the historic appearance through inappropriate design materials or adding a finish or color that changes the sash, depth of reveal, the reflectivity, or the appearance of the frame should be avoided. Replacing viable windows rather than maintaining the original should be avoided. Shutters: Shutters should be operable or appear to be operable. "Shutter dog" hardware should be used to enhance the appearance that the shutters are operable. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation suggest the following: The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Repairing the existing jalousie windows or replacing them with an identical design would be the most appropriate methods for repairing this building according to the LDRs, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. The applicant has stated, however, that the current windows are in very poor condition with broken mechanisms and allow the penetration of water. The applicant has chosen not to install new jalousie windows as there is concern over the security and storm protection they provide and their lack of energy efficiency. The proposed 1 over 1 single hung aluminum windows have frames with a 5 Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 20, 2005 depth of approximately 2.75" and are in keeping with this style of dwelling and period of construction. Also, when using impact resistant glass, the building code does not require the installation of hurricane shutters. The applicant has not stated the proposed color of the frames which are available in white, bronze or an anodized finish. The glass is available in clear, grey or bronze tint and a condition of approval is that clear glass is installed. The replacement windows are part of an overall repair scheme for the building which includes roof repairs, the upgrading of services and the installation of air conditioning which will allow the currently vacant duplex to become occupied. The building retains most of its original wooden shutters and shutter dogs, and, although the installation of impact resistant glass means they are not required for storm protection, it is a condition of approval that they are retained and repaired or replaced as necessary as they contribute to the building's character. Where the original shutters and dogs are beyond repair or are missing, they should be replaced with shutters and dogs of an identical design and material. There are two Bermuda shutters to the front of the duplex. It is recommended that these are replaced with shutters of the original design and material. Based on the analysis above, positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8)(c) and (g), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation can be made. Ms. Tullia Taylor, applicant, 238-240 NE 5th Terrace, Delray Beach, advised when she acquired the property she was going to tear it down, however, she decided to restore it. Her concern is that when she acquired the property there was an empty lot behind it, and how she wants to build another house behind it. However, the City does not support this. They would prefer I tear down the house and build two single-family homes. This would be a hardship on me. I will need a waiver to build another home, and will be coming before the Board for this waiver. If it is not approved I will be forced to tear it down or sell it. I would like direction from the Board. Mr. Adams advised that the applicant purchased two properties, one has the duplex on it and the property adjacent is vacant. He advised Section 4.4.1(C) except for single family residences subject to the R-1-A (Single Family Residential) zoning district standards, if two (2) or more adjoining lots (or combination of lots and portions of lots) of record were under the same ownership as of October 18, 1994, and if the total frontage and the total area is equal to or greater than that which is required by the zoning district regulations, said property shall not be developed except in accordance with the minimum frontage and lot area requirements of the district. Ownership shall be determined by the property tax rolls on file in the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser's Office as of October 18, 1994. When Ms. Taylor came before us with an application to demolish the building, we could not accept it. Now that she wants to redesign the duplex the lot is not large enough. A waiver would be required to construct a single family home on the lot; however, staff does not support that. 6 Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 20, 2005 Chairman Perez advised we are getting off the subject, and we should talk about this during the discussion item portion. Brian Shutt, Esquire, advised since we have not publicly noticed this, it is not appropriate to talk about something of this nature as they might be coming back to the Board in the future. It is a problem discussing what we will or will not do. This cannot be discussed as a discussion item. Chairman Perez advised the applicant to prepare a conceptual site plan and submit it to staff and it can be brought before the Board. Mr. Adams advised Ms. Taylor is concerned that she can't get insurance because of the roof and windows, and wants to carry out the repairs as soon as a possible. However, it is pointless if she has to demolish the building. Chairman Perez advised she has to submit the conceptual site plan. Mr. Adams advised the COA was submitted for the construction of one of the houses, but we did not want to put in a COA until the applicant decided what direction she was going in. Chairman Perez advised it can go to the Board at the next meeting as s discussion item. Brian Shutt, Esquire, advised it should come forward as a COA and not a discussion item. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing. It was moved by Ms. Reich, seconded by Mr. Silberstein, and approved 5 to 0 to move approval of the COA for 238-240 NE 5th Terrace by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and (c) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: 1) That clear glass is used in the windows; 2) That the wooden shutters and shutter dogs are retained and repaired where necessary; and, 3) That where the original shutters are beyond repair or are missing, they are replaced with shutters and shutter dogs of an identical design and material C. Lot 3 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District, Peter Dwyer, Agent Item Before the Board: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of a single family residence. 7 Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 20, 2005 Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. Mr. Adams entered the project file into the record. The property consists of Lot 3, Dixie Del-Ida Plat and is situated on the southeast side of Dixie Boulevard between Swinton Avenue and NE 2nd Avenue. The 0.24 acre property is presently vacant and is zoned Single Family Residential (R-1-AA). The lot is situated within the Del-Ida Park Historic District. At its meeting of June 2, 2004, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) reviewed and recommended approval to the City Commission of a request to re-plat Lots 2-5, Block 5, Del-Ida Park in order to accommodate the construction of three (3) new, single- family residences in addition to the retention of a contributing single family dwelling (four lots total). The HPB also recommended approval to the City Commission of waiver requests regarding the minimum lot dimension requirements for the lots proposed to be created via the aforementioned re-plat. Along with these recommendations, the HPB approved a demolition request for the aforementioned garage, and a variance for the reduction of the side interior setback from ten feet (10') to five feet (5') to allow the retention of the extant historic dwelling. The Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval of the Dixie Del-Ida Plat as well as the associated waivers at their meeting of June 21, 2004. Subsequently, at its meeting of July 6, 2004, the City Commission denied the request to re-plat Lots 2-5, Block 5, Del-Ida Park as well as the associated waivers regarding the minimum lot dimension requirements based upon a finding that the proposed lots were inconsistent with the surrounding development pattern and would adversely affect the neighborhood. At its meeting of October 6, 2004, the HPB recommended approval to the City Commission for an application to subdivide the non-conforming Lots 2-5, Block 5, Del- Ida Park into three (3) conforming lots while still retaining the extant historic dwelling. The City Commission approved the subdivision at its meeting of November 2, 2004. The applicant is now requesting approval for the construction of a single family residence on Lot 3 of the subdivision. The proposal is to construct a 3,178 square foot 2-story single family residence. The first floor living area contains 1,945 square feet and consists of a living/dining room, library, great room, kitchen, utility room, guest bedroom and cabana. Also on the ground floor are: a 140 square foot entrance porch, a 459 square foot double car garage, and a 208 square foot lanai. The second floor contains 1,233 square feet and contains a master bedroom with master bathroom, two further bedrooms, and a bathroom. The dwelling is designed in the Mediterranean Revival style and is of concrete block and stucco construction. The roof has multiple pitches with clay barrel tiles and no overhang at the eaves, and the windows and French doors are aluminum framed with impact resistant glass and 7/8" muntins. It appears as if there are a mixture of casement windows and sash windows in the building; however, no details have been submitted. 8 Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 20, 2005 The asymmetrical façade of the property faces to the northwest and is stepped back at a number of points, particularly at the second story level. The garage is to the front of the property but is set back behind a porte-cochere to lessen its impact on the façade. The windows to the front façade are arched on the first story and rectangular on the second story with varying patterns of divided lights. The façade of the building has a number of ornamental details including an ornamental door casement consisting of two pre-cast stone Doric pilasters supporting an architrave, all of which are ornately detailed. The first floor windows have pre-cast surrounds while those on the second story have a smooth stucco surround. Above the first floor entrance is a balcony with a wrought iron handrail in the center of which is an ornamental metal medallion and supporting the façade arcade is a pre-cast spiral column with a Corinthian capital. There are also decorative lighting fixtures at either side of the porte-cochere (details attached), a circular louvered vent over the library window, and "sunbrella" awnings over three of the second story windows. The side elevations (southwest and northeast) are plainer in appearance although the second story of the southwest elevation contains a Venetian window and the northeast elevation has a dummy chimney. The rear elevation is also relatively plain although there are 3 archways leading to the lanai, a "sunbrella" awning over one of the second story windows, and a large tri-partite window on each story. The body of the house will be white in color and the barrel tile roof of the house will be terracotta. The front and garage doors and the window frames will be stained dark brown, and the "sunbrella" awnings will be green and white stripes. The front and rear yards will be landscaped with the front walkway to the house comprising of brick pavers. No details of the type or color of pavers has been submitted. A swimming pool measuring 30' x 15' is proposed for the rear yard; however the location of the pool equipment has not been indicated. This must be shown on the plans. A 4.5' high Ficus Hedge and a pool fence will enclose the rear yard with access from the front being through two 4.5' high wooden gates at either side of the dwelling. The gate to the southwest is attached to block and stucco gate piers with the one adjoining the garage curving up in height from 4.5' to 6.9' The proposal also includes associated landscaping for the new development. A number of existing trees have to be removed from the site including a Norfolk Pine, two Sabal Palms, a dead Citrus Tree, and a number of Oaks. Existing trees and new trees are included in the proposed landscape plan. The trees comprise of 1 Gumbo Limbo, 1 Clustering Fishtail Palm, 2 Coconut Palms, 1 East Palatka, 1 Frangipani Tree, 1 Live Oak, 1 Purple Glory Tree, and 4 Montgomery Palms. A number of shrubs, groundcovers and accents are also proposed, and these include Cocoplum, Ficus Hedge, Dwarf Firebush, Pink Ixora, Dwarf Date Palm, Indian Hawthorn, and Cat Palm. The proposed two-story single family dwelling is designed in the Mediterranean Revival style and reflects a traditional style of architecture found within the Del-Ida Park Historic District. The design includes many features associated with the Mediterranean Revival style including cast stone ornament around the façade doorway and windows, an arcade, and a porte-cochere yet it can be recognized as a modern building through the use of modern materials. 9 ' Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 20, 2005 However, there are some concerns with regard to the structure's height, front façade proportion, and the scale of the building. Concerns over these issues have also been raised by owners of neighboring properties who have submitted letters (copy attached) stating their objections to the proposal. As indicated in the table below, within this section of Dixie Boulevard, the majority of the dwellings are small, single story structures with floor areas ranging from 664 square feet to 2,381 square feet. The proposed dwelling will have two stories, a frontage of 55', and a total floor area of 3,178 square feet making it the largest structure in this section of Del-Ida Park. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(a), the height of proposed buildings shall be visually compatible in comparison or relation to the height of existing structures and buildings. The proposed 2-story dwelling will be 25.5' high while the majority of the other dwellings in Del-Ida Park are single story dwellings. Furthermore, LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(b) states that the front facade of each building or structure, shall be visually compatible with and in direct relationship to the height of the front elevation of other adjacent or adjoining buildings within a historic district. The adjacent properties (106 and 118) are both one story and have a frontage of 24' and 34' respectively compared with the proposed 55'frontage of the proposed dwelling. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(j), the size of a building, the building mass in relation to open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, and porches shall be visually compatible with the building size and building mass of historic sites, buildings and structures within a historic district. The proposed building is greater in size and mass than the adjacent buildings and the majority of the buildings in the Del-Ida Park Historic District. However, there are two existing two story dwellings at 125 Dixie Boulevard (1928, Mediterranean Revival, contributing), and 515 North Swinton Avenue (1925, Mediterranean Revival, contributing). The two story dwelling at 125 Dixie Boulevard has a total of 1,748 square feet and a frontage of 38', and 515 North Swinton Avenue, has a total floor area of 2,289 square feet and a frontage of 36'. Ms. Kim Dwyer, owner of the property, advised when she first met with the Historic Preservation Board her proposal was for four (4) lots. She went in front of the City Commission and requested smaller lots and smaller coverage. City Commission denied this request. We went back to the Planning and Zoning Department and they wanted three large lots with larger frontages. This was approved by the HPB. We designed a 3,100 sq. ft. home. We are here to request building two homes in Seagate. In regard to the comments on the height of the home, we stepped back the front of the house. The porte-cochere is of the same style as the house, the garage is on the back of the property, and all of the setbacks have been met. There are structures of this size throughout the Del-Ida Park community, and there are commercial buildings as well. I understand people would like to see 1,000 square foot cottages; however, we have gotten a lot of pressure to build larger homes in this area. The only way to reduce the height of the house is to have 8 foot ceilings. We have taken into consideration the height of the buildings around us. We tried to design something in keeping with the character of the community. We are requesting your approval. Mr. Adams advised it is a very nice house. The Design Guidelines state that it should be compatible with the existing houses. The overall consensus is the house would not fit in with the rest of the homes on Dixie Boulevard. 10 Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 20, 2005 Chairman Perez advised it is a nicely designed house, it does step back on the second floor, and it is broken up very well. Ms. Dersh as well as Mr. Silberstein concurred that it was a nice design. Mr. Silberstein advised if there is concern about the scale, perhaps the gable on the side could be a hip to bring the mass down. Ms. Schatz advised that she likes the design of the house, and to build a smaller house is unrealistic as this house is not that large. Mr. Adams wanted to insure that the Technical Comments as listed in the staff report are complied with prior to obtaining a building permit. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing. It was moved by Mr. Silberstein, seconded by Ms. Schatz, and passed 5 to 0 to move approval of the COA for Lot 3 Del-Ida Plat by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(H), 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), and 4.6.16(H)(1)(a-g) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to conditions, subject to the following conditions: 1) That the proposed chimney be either removed or relocated to comply with the building setback requirements. 2) That the gable be changed on the side elevation to hip. 3) That the Technical Items are met. Motion amended by Mr. Silberstein, seconded by Ms. Schatz, and passed 5 to 0 to change condition no. 3 to read: That the side elevations of the gable ends be changed to hip. D. House of Vintage, 123 South Swinton Avenue, Old School Square Historic District, Jeffrey Silberstein, Architect, Agent Item Before the Board: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class V site plan, landscape plan, design elements, and a waiver request for a residential extension to a commercial property. Mr. Silberstein stepped down. Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. 11 ' Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 20, 2005 Mr. Adams entered the project file into the record. The subject property consists of Lot 3, Block 70 of the Sundy and Cromer Amended Plat. The 1,347 sq. ft. Masonry Vernacular structure was constructed in 1947 as a residence and displays a cross gable shingle roof and varying fenestration including metal casement, jalousie and awning windows. The building is designated historic and is considered a contributing building in the Old School Square Historic District. The property is zoned Old School Square Historic District (OSSHAD) and is used as a commercial premises. At its meeting of January 15, 2003, the HPB approved, with conditions, the conversion of the single family dwelling to office, the construction of a four (4) space asphalt parking lot to the rear (east) of the property and the creation of one parking space to the front (west), the installation of a handicapped accessible ramp, demolition of a 96 sq. ft. non-contributing wood frame shed, and the installation of landscaping. Approval was also given for waiver requests to allow parking in front of the historic building and a waiver to reduce the landscape strips on the north side from five feet (5') to four feet (4') and on the south side from five feet (5') to three and a half feet (3.5'). A variance request was also approved to allow a back-out parking space onto Swinton Avenue; provided that the space is designated for employee parking and that signage is provided directing patrons to the rear parking area. During its meeting of September 17, 2003, the Board reviewed and approved a Class II Site Plan Modification for the conversion from office to retail. On September 22, 2003, the applicant was cited by Delray Beach Code Enforcement for the removal of the original divided light, steel casement windows and the installation of 6/6 aluminum frame windows related to the elevation changes from the Class V Site Plan approval. The applicant was notified that the windows were inappropriate and that they must submit a COA for the installation of new divided light, casement windows. On January 7, 2004, HPB approval was granted, subject to conditions, for the installation of a free- standing sign, an under canopy sign, casement windows, and storm panels. A Class IV Site Plan Modification has been submitted for the addition of a 3 story residential addition to the rear of the extant historic structure. The development proposal includes the following: • Construction of a 1,882 sq. ft. 3 story residential addition to the rear of the building and demolition of the existing single-loaded four (4) space parking lot; ■ Construction of a four (4) space back-out parking lot on to the alley including one handicapped accessible space; and, • Installation of associated landscaping and relocation of the trash receptacles to the south side of the building. The development proposal involves the addition of a 1,882 square foot residential unit to a contributing historic building currently in a commercial use. The proposed waiver to reduce the perimeter landscape strip at the north end of the parking lot can be supported in order to accommodate the width of the parking spaces. With respect to the design of the proposed addition, however, the applicant is attempting to introduce a new architectural style to the extant historic building and this section of the OSSHAD. The proposed extension fails to comply with the majority of the design requirements set out in the LDRs and the Design Guidelines and therefore is not consistent with Section 3.1.1 and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development 12 Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 20, 2005 Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. As the recommendation to provide a two-story structure will most likely impact the site design somewhat, the item should be postponed with direction. Mr. Jeffrey Silberstein, A.I.A., Jeffrey Silberstein Architect & Assoc. Inc., 524 NE 2nd Street, Delray Beach, advised he was in agreement with the first ten (10) Technical Items listed in the Staff Report. However, in regard to No. 11, and the design of the building, please read the article that you just received. There are also three (3) items noted in the Delray Beach Book regarding new additions for historic buildings. 1. The building should be diversified so existing are clearly of two different designs yet complimentary. It is always difficult as to what is complimentary when you are doing an addition to a contributing or historic building. The intent was not to emulate the existing cottage but to make a clear distinction. The reason the west elevation is left plain is because you don't want you eyes going toward that building. It is set back 75 feet from the street. You will never see it as a pedestrian walking on Swinton Avenue and you will not see the side elevations. 2. Locating the appendage at the rear. We did locate it to the rear and we tried to make it as inconspicuous as possible. The footprint is the same size as the house. 3. Additional levels should be setback and be placed as not to radically alter the historic appearance of the building. This was a deliberate design to do exactly that. The house stands on its own. If you do happen to see it from the street it will look like a new building that was build behind the house. We have approved many buildings behind this house on 1st Avenue that are going to be 35 feet or higher. I did not want to put a building there that looked like a big cottage. I wanted it to blend in with the cityscape. A sketch of the building was passed to the Board. The old building stands on its own, and the other one disappears. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Mr. Adams advised the Guidelines also state with additions to historic properties located as inconspicuously as possible. I would suggest this means not making it higher than the extant existing building. Stepping back the upper story may help to minimize the difference. Warren Expand on this. The scale is larger, the building is higher, and the Guidelines do not introduce a new architectural style. Additions that overwhelm are not an acceptable solution. The LDRs are clear regarding the size of the building mass in relation to it being compatible with the building size and mass. In regard to the color blue, there is no guarantee that it will stay that color. Therefore, we are not adverse to the building being extended we would encourage the extension of the historic building so it can be retained. We feel it is inappropriate for this building in this section of the OSSHAD. Chairman Perez closed the Public Hearing. Ms. Dersh advised that the flat wall overpowers the building. The picture Mr. Silberstein gave us is a good example but you are talking half a story between the two. 13 Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 20, 2005 Mr. Silberstein advised the buildings are close to one and other. When you look up it blends in with the sky. We could do the building in the same color as the house. It could be all siding, but if the Board feels we should do it the same color we are OK with that. Ms. Schatz advised in looking at the picture the other part was not noticeable it blended in with the original building. How can you guarantee that the colors will stay the same. Regarding the Design Guidelines, it is confusing where it states "do not introduce a new architectural style to closely mimic the style of the existing building should be simple. I guess, if you are not supposed to make it look like what is there, but not supposed to introduce a new style. How do you achieve that goal? Mr. Adams advised you want it to be distinguishable and be appropriate and fit in. That could mean being one or two stories with a pitched roof. Chairman Perez advised the flat wall could be a problem. Mr. Silberstein advised he could provide another setback on the north facade. Chairman Perez was concerned with the height. You have to be somewhere in between regarding the style of the building. Ms. Dersh advised the addition is a full story taller. Mr. Silberstein advised the height could be reduced by two to three feet. Chairman Perez advised that aspects of the style enhance the original house; however, it is too high. If it was a two story building we would not have a problem. It was the Board's consensus that the building was too high. Chairman Perez asked Mr. Silberstein if the height could be reduced by three feet. Ms. Dersh advised the cable railing introduces a new style. Chairman Perez advised before a motion is made we need to make a decision whether we are going to accept this style or not. Chairman Perez asked Mr. Silberstein if he could to a contemporary style, but the height has to be reduced. Mr. Silberstein advised he would: 1) reduce the height, 2) break up the mass, an 3) the windows and doors will be vertical. Board discussion ensued relative to how the community will interpret this design, looking at alternatives, sloping the design of the roof, and bringing pictures of the surrounding homes to the next meeting. It was moved by Ms. Schatz, seconded by Ms. Dersh, and passed 4 to 0 (Mr. Silberstein stepped down) to table pending further information from the client regarding the following issues: 1. Reduce the scale 2. Offset the north elevation 3. Change the profile of the roof 4. Doors and windows should be vertical 14 Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 20, 2005 IV. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS A. Historic Preservation Poster Contest The following Posters were chosen from American Heritage School: Grand Prize: Tyler Ranew, 16354 Via Venetia West, 10th Grade Second Place: Elizabeth Seminano, 2952 NE 51st St., Margate, FL, 10th Grade Third Place: Catherine Dubin, 1125 Island Drive, 9th Grade V. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments: Mr. Clemmer Mayhew, representing Mr. Michael Bogle, advised he would like approval for his client to remove the roof tiles and replace with shingles on a noncontributing building in the West Settlers area (circa 1972). Brian Shutt, Esquire, advised it should come before the Board as a Certificate of Appropriateness at the next meeting. Mr. Zara Wright, Wright Way Roofing advised that Mr. Bogle has already given him $8,000 to reroof with shingles, and all of the other homes in the area have shingle roofs. Chairman Perez advised he must submit an application and come before the Board on May 4, 2005. Mr. Clemmer Mayhew, mentioned that dates on the homes in the Del Ida Park area are incorrect. He also mentioned that duplexes are contributing if they are fifty years or older. Mr. Adams advised that any application for any alterations for the building cannot be disregarded whether it is fifty years old. Mr. Mayhew inquired if you have a building that was placed on a 50 foot lot and you have an adjacent 50' lot you are not allowed to build a separate building on that lot. I am concerned about 414(c). The cottage at 119 NE 10th Street was demolished. I feel what we are requesting is keeping in the tradition of the Historic Preservation Board and similar to what you were doing in Del Ida Park. We request that this be a discussion item at the next Board meeting. I have included the survey and a brief outline and some photos of the building. Brian Shutt, Esquire, advised if Mr. Mayhew was asking for direction it needs to come in as a Certificate of Appropriateness. These are Quasi Judicial hearings and anything that comes in front of the Board needs to come before the Board as a Certificate of Appropriateness. We will either table it or postpone it. Brian Shutt, Esquire, advised the Board cannot make a determination in regard to granting relief. Staff would have to look at that and advise if the Board could do that. 15 Historic Preservation Board Minutes April 20, 2005 Ms. Judith Green, 1160 Nassau Street, advised there are two attached units on the east side and west side. Code Enforcement has not done anything regarding these units. In March 2005 a request for demolition was submitted for two units. Two homeowners want to demolish the units and the other two homeowners are not in favor. One unit at 1190 has been vacant for several years. I am the only full-time resident. The other owners live out of State. I am concerned about the demolition rather than making repairs, as I would be living in a construction zone for over a year. Mr. Adams advised he received a Certificate of Appropriateness for demolition and a proposal for new duplexes. The letters you sent to demolish is because of poor • construction, and the other two are lack of maintenance. It is difficult to tell what the situation is. There was a Homeowner Association Meeting and the vote was yes you can demolish these two units. The vote was not fair or valid. I have been reluctant to move forward. If they are allowed to demolish, we would need Engineering report and come before the Board for approval of demolition. Any approval would have to come from the Board as to what is proposed for the site. You would have to get legal advice we cannot give an opinion. B. Report from Historic District Representatives: None C. Board Members: D. Staff: VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Board made a motion to adjourn at 8:45 p.m. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for April 20, 2005 and was formally adopted and approved by the Board on May 18,2004. z . zz-, " enise A. Valek If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. • 16 r 1),7 DEER .BEACH __ = - - - - DEPFBEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD ,glIP� MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT AMP. 1993 1993 2001 2001 Agent: Tullia Taylor Project Name: Taylor Duplex Project Location: 238-240 NE 5th Terrace ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the replacement of existing windows at t 238-240 NE 5th Terrace, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H). BACKGROUND/PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject property consists of Lot 14, Block 9, Del-Ida Park, and is located on the southwest corner of NE 5th Terrace and NE 3rd Avenue. The 1,404 square foot duplex was built in 1954 in the Masonry Vernacular style and is of CBS construction. The structure is situated within the Del-Ida Park Historic District and is currently zoned Low Density Residential (RL). The building is currently classed as non-contributing; however, the 1991 survey states: 'This building is associated with the developmental history and exhibits the architectural elements of the Del-Ida Park area during the 1950's. Due to its historical and architectural significance, this building could contribute to the locally listed Del-Ida Park Historic District when the historic district is re-evaluated and the period of significance is expanded to include later historic resources'. There are no recent administrative or Board actions pertaining to this property. The current proposal is for the replacement of the existing jalousie windows with 1 over 1 single hung aluminum framed windows with impact resistant glass. ANALYSIS LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(c), and (E)(8)(g) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The applicable standards are as follows: Meeting Date:April 20,2005 Agenda Item: III.B. 238-240 NE 5th Terrace-Replacement windows Page 2 The Board Shall Consider: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, presented, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(8) All improvements to buildings, structures, and appurtenances shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility shall be determined in terms of the following criteria: (c) Proportion of Openings (Windows and Doors): The openings of any building within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the openings exemplified by the prevailing historic architectural styles within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors to the height of windows and doors among buildings within the district shall be visually compatible. (g) Relationship of Materials, Texture, and Color: The relationship of materials, texture, and color of the facade of a building shall be visually compatible with the predominant materials used in the historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. The following is suggested by the Delray Beach Design Guidelines regarding: Windows Retain distinctive windows which feature a sash, muntins, glazing, sills, heads, hood molds, paneled, or decorative doors jambs and moldings and shutters and blinds. Changing the historic appearance through inappropriate design materials or adding a finish or color that changes the sash, depth of reveal, the reflectivity, or the appearance of the frame should be avoided. Replacing viable windows rather than maintaining the original should be avoided. Shutters Shutters should be operable or appear to be operable. "Shutter dog"hardware should be used to enhance the appearance that the shutters are operable. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation suggest the following: The historic character of a property shall be retained and presented. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. p 238-240 NE 5th Terrace-Replacement windows Page 3 Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Analysis Repairing the existing jalousie windows or replacing them with an identical design would be the most appropriate methods for repairing this building according to the LDRs, the -. Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. The applicant has stated, however, that the current windows are in very poor condition with broken mechanisms and allow the penetration of water. The applicant has chosen not to install new jalousie windows as there is concern over the security and storm protection they provide and their lack of energy efficiency. The proposed 1 over 1 single hung aluminum windows have frames with a depth of approximately 2.75" and are in keeping with this style of dwelling and period of construction. Also, when using impact resistant glass, the building code does not require the installation of hurricane shutters. The applicant has not stated the proposed color of the frames which are available in white, bronze or an anodized finish. The glass is available in clear, grey or bronze tint and a condition of approval is that clear glass is installed. The replacement windows are part of an overall repair scheme for the building which includes roof repairs, the upgrading of services and the installation of air conditioning which will allow the currently vacant duplex to become occupied. The building retains most of its original wooden shutters and shutter dogs, and, although the installation of impact resistant glass means they are not required for storm protection, it is a condition of approval that they are retained and repaired or replaced as necessary as they contribute to the building's character. Where the original shutters and dogs are beyond repair or are missing, they should be replaced with shutters and dogs of an identical design and material. There are two Bermuda shutters to the front of the duplex. It is recommended that these are replaced with shutters of the original design and material. Based on the analysis above, positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8)(c) and (g), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation can be made. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS . A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the COA for 238-240 NE 5th Terrace by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and (c) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to conditions. 238-240 NE 5th Terrace-Replacement windows Page 4 C. Deny approval of the COA for 238-240 NE 5th Terrace by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and (c) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. RECOMMENDATION - Move approval of the COA for 238-240 NE 5th Terrace by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and (c) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: 1) That clear glass is used in the windows; 2) That the wooden shutters and shutter dogs are retained and repaired where necessary; and, 3) That where the original shutters are beyond repair or are missing, they are replaced with shutters and shutter dogs of an identical design and material. Attachments:Location map,photograph,window details Report Prepared by:Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner r J I JIIIIIIIIfIiiii , , III I I iI ; ►. III ! l -- / N.W. 11TH ST. N.E. 11TH ST. =v ! I 1 j ,:/-/-/? I///E) 1 I i ' a ¢ w 1 , I N.E. 10TH ST. Li 0 W z _ o 1 / ak Z N.E. 9TH ST. - N.W. 9TH ST. w Zili �' z �.o el > N.W. 8TH ST. GEORGEFT � BOULEVARD ■ 1 1 Pam :, \ y \ N.W. 7TH ST. MU N.E. 7TH ST. �4,,P• �\ II I i II 1 Li ' \ \ '( N.E. 7TH - ST. v N.W. 6TH ST. ' ? ' �' O -- --\ r---, N.E. 6TH ST_ v . O O i I I G4 � ' m m r l I 4- -0 ' O i r. ul z. z %' \ N.E. 5TH TERR. a cr i N.E. 6TH ST. • rW00D LANE \ I N � I C. .\ S.- I I 7 _ \ ` N.E. 5TH CT. I 0 -\ ` ' `. '•. \ I I I N.E. 5TH `ST. I L. \' �� I !Q TRINITY I 75 F�, I I & z z N.E. 5TH ST. Li,- > LUTHERAN .1=11IIIflfl 1E i I _ Ci m_ii 2 1 ui Ln L. LAKE IDA ROAD �Z ,�` ,�_ N.E. 4TH ST. N.E. 4TH ST. I POST -—� I CASON OFFICE METHODIST } - CHURCH w w r- 10 CI —I J a > InN -, Q Q o r w w Z cn n o N .- W 4j Li— LiI LO 11 i Z Z 2 Z Z I N \ -�� DEL-IDA PARK HISTORIC DISTRICT CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FL PLANNING do ZONING DEPARTMENT \ I -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- DRAWN BY: NPT le , ... - 1.-,.. -;-,•-• • CI -' - . •..• ' -','•'•'. ,,.- - • -•'"--•--:‘-'"-.*'....7' '.' • •kh.* 4. . !'' '..• : --I•'• ',‘. ; •.'•-• . . •-''''.1..''..,*-...: •'';,.' :-i.k.0-- ••:•-.S • .. ..:. '.: W :4-:',:-.1..-64e.. Fk,,".''4,-.',':40;1' .'41. . •.,' -' • • .i.-: ..-', .t,.'-'4-.. :.:-.. , .... ... , ' ., ',":..7- ''"*...' . . :,.,,''.: " .•'..:'".:'P' ... ri••:... •'" '• "'-_,-• 'i•*'•"*.l':•*'- 1 ..' ' • - . •• .. '• •' - "- ,-, ... - •.-,-. " ..........:,-_-4.7-- •-,,,,,I .....'''''''.-r.r.-,-'“-'' . - - -, , • , ' .•, •'-'- •it,..;,,r,V.Ve,;44%, ',..'. -•• •...-41.-,.t.!;...,.--,-----'- '-:' .,,,. =i- .-'''-'- '`"`"-: .- ,r_. ':-.::.-q!:, !;_;-% ,',''• 1,,aVMPARWM . .„,--_ -.-Z:-,-.:','.:S.-----,.-: - ....;,;.• , .- . „.-4...... -..„ :.t...:,,,:,,:f.'...,::,;::,:;,,',:.„a*Elii--.trg-::-..,--.7--..-,_:--. _':',r, --:rf'-'..- ',I...7-i:: %;:.;;.., - .' . :1, .•.'.: ': ' .. .- ... -• .•::::.,-: _7-•..;,;....;,'''''"•••c•:-...?e••?;:7S-•' ,11"-?- 4-4-' c. ,..: •:-...: .•'•1'.;-•-i-?.:---: - •,,'.i•,2,:••-Z?'-i.7.Z...'41-1.•:::...F4-" - --::Z!•'---":-if-.--fi -Ii..1 ".:-;.:-,:i,''4-: • • -•,..,';';?C';',:','ii: ..' ..L.'.1.'4-.7. --::-,.:,-.r.O. -----.:.)- -- • ••• • ...... -' • - ' -'. ' .= -...--.• •.---'.'.. ..1 1--:"---111. r.,-'..i- t•i- ; . • . :. .. - 7.,__._-, . ..,. r:-. '• tf.--t f. • • • . . -,, _..: . .....— ..- .. .'-';a5= ''''W— ' -.-.'.-77;...t5-''"''1:.• -.-:•--'','.....:.'",,-;::.:,--.;"....,.- . . -,- -- - -- - . ----•" - „,.„,...,:-:.1 ,-- .. .......r...to ,....,:;-.....;.,- ._., ... ,..,-- - ..,... ct,:i'-:;;,:,•;-',.,-,.ir..: . . ,-•:-"*.-- '''''-3.- -• -,a-rr---,--.-•-•-: ••••-'4'tfi:::11':=,-,'-.7-'4.--''..:*--!.%-(:'-i.;?:-.----. .b.14.;:).:i .....,..;._.„,...,,,,....0 .7. • _ .,-...,..-,., .......- ..... . ...-,,.-;...,,,..:.,..7.„.. ,....-,..-...,...-<i.4,0...,-- ". -,%57:1,,..., - ..;',.7",aleir..":„ -: •.-:.,•,* .-''',',..-,-.,-,.-,f'-.0:::.','::,..,.,-. -- :'. '- z :- •-..i.-;•.-.....,'-.',-...-:.,•-- .:, .,-;-.,-,s... 8 V..4, s.,..'"iltl--.:..---,,f.,---,--s..-%.1,--.'i..-:',-4--..,•"•-• ---:,---.,,,,,,...,.—...-...,- :•-...-•,,,, ,- --,-..,--,.,.,..,•-vt--...p-,,,,,,:,.._ _ -A. _,. , ...• '',.,,.. :.:•-•"1..,-,,...-,..c..--,-•:".,*----,--'-`.,..,-. -,,:: -,,,-4.:.-1..,-,-..,--ft,,-,:-_--:12.-; :giz,,,.:11.::..,..,_14...r.„*,....:iii- •,,„ -',.,_.,,. ‘.:,-...„,-.,,..-.,,,,.._,, .• _- -.--''' .;%.'-',..' ._....._„.__,,-: -,!,4,-,....k:,.;-: - r'a--..--21:-•=':r-4,1,2-'-'1=.'....'::-....::-.'''''"-.7,;.-- -2,F-'rifr--e'-i--1:1-4',.._r;,. ---:'..,..,---,_-.- •7;;;;;,-: "-.,-;`,.-3:t.,---,-,-_,-,i4".,....,--,............1,--V.-- -,',.:. "74 ..fl - --.-41.f.1.---1'. ....01 .,1--","".•-•?-- p:'-'‘,,,:i"...,..;•:Clia--••,-;=; ---,r.7'.` .:-.::,•`--,:•' -'7's7-1?-•;'t-'32.:',=•-:?f?..4:7:4-4.. •,..,-,-;:r--71'•,- 7_77.:,.--:--.,:•2_,„--i'?-± ,,--: '''',--r-,=-;-‹..;-.--_,,, ,,:!.,"?,•„.e'Llk,',-.P.,:,.1W-,-,_-ik-.rt.„•:,-,:,. -....-.-•,.-_:.•.-:-...7-7;.---.7.-...,.._,----.....-----,-_,,,ft-,'-lt,'51..,,..-_--.---::-1,4;•--f.fc:-_,---,--,.....0A.kg,!.:-..;_:1 -, Trie—"'''-.. '.'''''''' ''----- :-."-.---,-,,,,,-...-_-.•:.•.:-..-.,.-..::-.:,...,,,-:-:-"--'...-:-.'..--..'.,-"-:_::'.7."-_,'"---,==r.:._.---;':::,!;,..--'.:1-,:“.-'.. ..r,,,...-.•,- -,,, ,o.!::•,,----t4f---t- -.'.'-'-•-,...,---.,-,--.'" - - • ',-',_ , . ,..4-4-Ri ''.'r.'''-:.-'-•:'-:''.:„:.-.:.;-::'':',.-:',...---- 1.:•''..-","7;..,...:i--''''';---;;--;... .'--,;:',,--',...,.....-17''-•:::-S.7-:,..";--..'--". '''.1,',",.'-..-...-'.-- -.'-' ..::;."'-r-,-;''---%"..'.':P,---:'-'')i-l'.'t:-'"7-:'.'-' ;'''''z'TC".:',:-=;.' Yis.,.,,---,''.i.-.-*';' ,;"'i,*1 -::-.-,,t,-_-_.-__---, --,.....-.-.;-:..: ,."......-,;,,,,,::., ,,--._ --..,,-.-.,.-.--.,.: . -..:.".'-,-.---",,T-:-.--'-'.. ., -,--:,',.;;!'-..3:":;•----,'-':',,f,.. .'.:',,,,:.,i-i- --i'''.1e..int';:03.-4'4'.:-!-.'il.-. ;kt.rq-it''..::;.;-:i5i11,-1 .--,,,,,..,_ -.;,:.__..1..-...-..-.;=.,,,,t,--,_:-,..,:;:-,,.,:..-_,..--:.-._ ...,_,.,_-:.:_i,:-..1‘.--..y-i.i..',:,.f;-c::i.,,..--.^.-.,;.',ii:-,-',.-•_'.=-,,,,I,.--'.,...,'__;:,.-=.il:F.;-_irY-,t-'fif;''',-:;'R.'-.-'r'.r::;0-''Wlt-egf-'':'=i';..3t-',---,'--'t,•-"A.'';-i,.,_4i 'gic,t''.'I';': '..,':'.:•1-r.S.if-,":,:•:_'''..---.-.:.:,-. ::,-.......,',::- ..--.-_,•-.--,-;••-',.--'.T,--..--7-',:,:,'•:-'.2.'-i,:':•-•"._,-..--'-,_:-.'_...••!--. --•>1.--!';',='''•''':-Z:'-i-'--:--:•.---1,<-'-;-'7!F?:•.1.1.,,,:.•7-.71.•.,3•*1.,5,.'i%•-.A4-..a-1•>.',..-'--C.,,•:•,,;'rs•-;T-s--, ,•:-;-.-'•-,•';Hf.=-1•';',,,,..'.--45'1:='!:"..-:W,q .:-,-.,'-,;..,-_,•;,:::; ,-,-=,:?;.i'-'17.--.;-:.:;,-_•:;_,:--•,,-,-.,,:_:::L:-.::"r:-•.•;,:-",.."•-•• •:•-:::..]...-:-.,--J.-..-''.-•:'-'•-','::'----,;'i....'::i•;.-:-‘.''.•-.'A'-'-';='•-:41,-,-::•-'1-1:'--::,';f'-'''''''''''ZC--";'-'-'S-.7ii_•. .,..'''.-L--.:Wt•-r-F'--('---"'" •'.'"?...: ktfr':••:-.'ii'V.`•:.C.,.;1•'-'f.,•01 ,.---•:;•,,,-'-' ,...:-i. -.'..:--1,..,..•ZF....;,.."•_:._?'-':•.;_:•;',.-•••••.--;',--:•-h':---- i---:::4,••.Q-::Z-:.-i-::1•_--;"i"..'..;:-.17, -'..*-,-i,z, c•::,12-'=f-:-15-:'-n';'-'.ra`jil.1"•-.7.'::,-•,..fi.',V.,_"TP'-',=-_,.'fTtff.'eli.',---'--;:‘:-1-e:',"7,•.--7. -t-7;:-3.•'..:,,,1\-1,-,-•••-•:IL-E;::•-`--W4-'1•f•g•V:•W_•.;1 -'-'-'7":-*'•:,--3-.,..-----':•'-1:r ri.r...-';'.:::---•:'''-f-:.•-• "7_,--.1:•.'.'..-'..'''.'.2-::7-,•,:,--.,.."-T-'4.-•:r•-:','•-;="4"-';-?:-"2.-•::..: •-•;','.,.i-:-::-,'•-.W.i;-,--,-*,-•lif-,',"=i.,-,.-.!.."-aes;,;---1-•::::-.1--izf•s•$;'.1.t'-k: :.2. --..:7.=,-V-i-- -_,2-11•.al•:•_,;-,311-•-!-.,:-:,-‘•14 --,-.1',‘ ,_„4,)1 ,.' -'1 .:."-.•:"•,•••,:n 1.1.'-,,,.=k' rz•'••••",; . ':.•./111 j. .• ---‘i-..;P--. - •-•• -'---.-:'-.4•A-'+-•I' •-•. -'-''....--:_,-'-'-'''.'•z.;-'7-'''•:".',.. ::::'. ,•'41'*'''''''''•''.i.,1'.F :Isc; .,•." '',. -*--".',...,';'P', 4.1•••••••'w"•''.-,-.-..,. ---.,-,-; - -,-- f.'ilii .-,- :-..,...,.--"••••-...,".;':-.:3''-'.':•,'. ...-:-.,74•::: •,- .,;..r-,..;,. .k.;i. 4.i . ...s',:. ;. ,',-, N...',..,;!,s-',' ,,/elfr.'..t, ......- -i;:i.::-';•;•. .i'/-; .".!.i;/`: '-:-- - ‘•••.-f.' ,.,.i'' ---' .c.,, ...,,,-- -,-;.fri-iNf.,-. %---..,--- . .-4,?.-- -_,- :--7,1-,.: v..,..1,1,,.. ..,-. . --1 • . .-_ -,..,.--..,,, ,,.. , -,,i,T, ,,,...,..,-,..,,.: .,„„,-;if - ...,...-4.}:. : . A, ,.-, ?Qi,_," '-(-1,-:5"1,-.',.::!t'IIIre4t."..• -'.:1:2),•-... .,'7:4:.\:W. 0-• 1A- . A.' ;'•-t4,-,!..,k.1.1.4M's. .',-.'-‘,`5,.,,, ••%,,,,,N- .,1 4 .—..--..',N, , , -,-.-,..,:••• -,,,-,.x--,1', 4 .. .:. . :_ ; • . ,...,' - ... ,'...kNizz.S'e",,, *..-.-- -,.-i•l•.,iai '.. - - - • -.4:'4'to.d ' -, 4 = ...:0) 4,11\ -:. •.,..;-.-..-"t:., b 4.-:,N;V.,.-,.‘,...4_ .„.." ..... ,.....s,...- - 9 •f '.'', 4,, ,, . ..1 ''''''''"'•' ‘'. . r h•-- ,-1-2.:;.;4,:K414.'...i-I-;:--;-'-:::_-1 ,s.1,1•;,1,.).4-'-.1‘:.-,,,•;gat:. •-% liFlki: - ''--:'' IliOni.-:f.. .-:f .!1'....:Y•.,:',t.....it!..-: .--(44,d'i, ... ....\;Till. - . . - . . . - • ' . : - . :-.C.v.--,i,„.„......ti,F441••. .;'...:43'.. - '''.1. ..1-•,:1?2..'; ./-34' • ...- •1:..-••" ,.iir•;,'-'4'-4:-.-;:i.......1.--• ,r,• 1 ',.,-.i„:. : , .....4%'''.: •-.' ' -V i• . st. r:j..... 4--ilf:SC,..' ..', -7.‘''...- F"' - = .",' -. ---,.•'`71:fr 5.-•:t.;—4:,'..--•--..."•'.i tr••,''..• : ' • -.9. 1'4..7,'::-..:',c1j.,:::: ,,..e..•:**':'.'• . ',. ..rt•;3:1,- .___.___._____L. - ,lt.y.-1.7-.;•,-•.:•:..F.liv...L.:-':% '_ •-.. I •.,.!,..:...7. 7',.'7.f.....- : 1.......'§''.-.,1.7'7 --...61.,-'',.;t.•,..";••'.. ",-;-.;.--• -'2----;'- 4--"'-'''''tit','VA rill't' •' - ' .:-___L____••1".1*__,-----1---t-,--7: .,_::-_ --- 7-'___:-..---...-;--4-:_::::.:.f. .!..,"g:4.t.6.s.s., \A ...... .,, ,„..,..,..,..,- ,..,__.... . . -T-g—r-0,-,..-.:r4..,-., • -,,.-: , .---:,---.----.. •.-..., .43.,:s.„ -—i':.'.:‘! ''''''"'"'" ---, ;-i-d.-1.g.-i.- -.4,--,-...,•,-;‘' -•...-,,,'A , -_,-,....„,.. . . ---:,1,.--...-._.:- --,.:,-, ,,,,, .: i • -.2-..7-,• ,'..v•:•=:....=;i.: .24-:-,104.' f.,-.11-:-::,! ..- -%.,..,..4./%if -..:-::f,..„...1:•,z.,.,,S. ..>:' ,t-';i4:.'-..:•_-.:.:::_:1:....:41,./,,. .i..' •. k 1 !i. ,;,.. • -••••::: ..A: '..•-.:-.-e-••• ,:,•.7,-.... e-,i:,4,2„.Z.:2 --. -X(4; ::'. ' ri: .12 iN:4;:v413417A t • / '1'.-.;..1-:L.:--- ..,:-.;:',qr.%t••-••'.." - %'' .2,'.1 '"- • -- . ..---- - Z ,- :,--'.. --'...- '...,t,--."- ,..1.,-y2i ... . . cet•',";TA.4 J.-.'. ,"-'...c.i:c...,2":., '-,...ifiik,„.."46i.\'...2 . . ..•,`.-:.,c: f.,-.41- ....-..•..I,r.;.. ., ., . i • • 10,,,014,v, 41., .„.....-__,,, ,01„1,,,,,,,,„„..... .if.,. ,11 . .,.‘,. .-li,,,s. ,--z- V•y"1-,•I,..- ,; • . ; -•-•::.-.`,:-.4.ta:,-..:1-..,,,,.+0.N.::-..r.I. .gor-ii..4.4 • '''..„.:-",---r-7....A..,e;-'-:..--*"4.,—."...IV', 1111A,44 l!PVY;;t;',.4144.0Ifte.;.;:ei..- '--.5-'1'.--1-.;,'- ,i AO---'41/1;i•. . i . . . ... . . . . ' • • • : .- • .,.• -...._:....,:.-,.-?.., • :.:•, -:-:.. '.../.. ..i ''..-....'. •';;',.--' '' '..:'. .. ...%-•"'''.4, '-'...--..--'..7 --• :- - ----' ' .r'' '?'''''. -'-.' ..:.'t;::•••-:'.:;::•'--;.-. .:"::':.--;-.: C'''L:!•:4i.O.',.'i:;?t,;!%.P.::;`. ;:lf,,c"..:,;f::::: ;-'i:F: ::::: ;-5-;;-;';'7":j:;'-:-'t.."Y.;:::.:.'1:.--1-:-.:.."..'":--7:-':, i-,::-'-':-.-:-.- '.7....!....r.--:,....z-..i..,-,:::,-,7-.I.:.-s.,-T.'vAiiz,;,..„--,57.1, ;ts _ 1. dard Features of - ; 0 IMPACT Single Hungr ;4 ' . n ! • Standard Glazed Unit Sizes j 19 1/8- 26 1/2- 37 53 1/8- .c bons: _ Je County NOA # 99-1028.06 i/ r _____, , i' -ida Building Code 471 ;D r i2 Q Q ,. ` t 22 32 4a74,11. H32 terials: .--- = `rame and sash members shall be ,/ y/ ,r G/ lo uded 6063-T6 aluminum alloy. Note:Optional Grid Shown °3 ., ] ne members shall have a minimum `' -Cr -Cr Q Q .th of 2 3/4". (Available in White,Bronze or Anodized Finish) ¢ y ¢z strudion: 13 H33 23 33 ne members shall be coped at the corners and assembled with nless steel screws for tight union. Sash horizontal members ,/ ,i/ 4/ o‘z scope into vertical members and are coped and assembled with nless steel screws. dware: o Q Q Q Q h operates on concealed block and tackle balances. Sash `-) om rail has an integrated lift rail. Sash may be removed from iz • A' l/- rior for ease of cleaning. Locking hardware shall be a sweep 14 H34 24 34 at the sash top. Windows over 23" in width shall have (2) :ep locks. ,/ f/ '/i zing: idow shall be factory wet glazed with 5/16" laminated glass . 1 an extruded glazing bead. (Available in Clear,Grey or Bronze Tint) to 4 1 Q Q 4 atMipping: ri— exterior of sash vertical members will contain wool pile ch will form a continuous seal with elastomeric vinyl, located at Idz ,z ¢z 1 sash sill and interlock horizontal members. 15 H35 25• 35• :d Screen: een shall fit flush in the frame. Screen frame shall be roll-formed // 1 fz ?z ninum box profile. Mesh fabric shall be 18 x 16 grey fiberglass. ne is circular profiled vinyl. 3/4'r \ i uM - Q 4 4 r` When describing Colonial Grid patterns, please provide the number of lites per sash. ¢' I r- 16 H36 26' Y;e.,-;6+4 SKIM 111 Examples: r t .' Brittany Pattern Available in Colonial ! i ;II and Brittany Grid i I I I• W I■ , ( ! I :J a1011 al , Flat Grid sM_z� o Interior/ t -- ..°M ....... Exterior t I 1 ( !I _ j i 1 ( TYPICAL 6/6 4/4 2/2 --I 2 3/4- I l l4 st,-H33 I.t i- � W ” (26 I/2. . 38 3/8-1 NOTE:WINDOW SIZES SHOWN ARE OUTSIDE u - '- �„ FLANGE TO FLANGE. I— - OVERALL FRAME WIDTH I—I INSIDE FRAME SIZE 1" SMALLER THAN SHOWN. ...a secnof. .IA..© SECT'on `WILL MEET EGRESS REQUIREMENTS DELRAYBEACH - - DELRAY BLACH kthai HISTORIC.PRESERVATION BOARD • liii MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT 11 1993 1993 2W1 - ?DO1 Agent: Dennis Thompson Project Name: Vickers Residence Project Location: 220 NW 2"d Street ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the replacement of existing windows and the installation of storm protection at 220 NW 2nd Street, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H). BACKGROUND/PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject property consists of the west 75' of Lot 1 and the west 75' of the north 23.5' of Lot 2, Block 43, Town of Delray, and is located on the southeast corner of Martin Luther King Jr. Drive (NW 2"d Street) and NW 3rd Avenue. The 1,766 square foot single family dwelling was built in 1948 in the Minimal Traditional style and is of wood frame construction with vinyl siding. The structure is considered a contributing building within the West Settlers Historic District and is currently zoned Single Family Residential (R-1- A). There are no recent administrative or Board actions pertaining to this property. The current proposal is for the replacement of existing aluminum framed awning windows with 6 over 6, single hung aluminum framed windows and the installation of removable hurricane panels. ANALYSIS LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(8)(c), and (E)(8)(g) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The applicable standards are as follows: The Board Shall Consider: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation as amended from time to time. Meeting Date:April 20,2005 Agenda Item:III.A. 220 NW 2nd Street-Replacement windows Page 2 (E)(8) All improvements to buildings, structures, and appurtenances shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility shall be determined in terms of the following criteria: (c) Proportion of Openings (Windows and Doors): The openings of any building within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the openings exemplified by the prevailing historic architectural styles within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors to the height of windows and doors among buildings within the district shall be visually compatible. (g) Relationship of Materials, Texture, and Color: The relationship of materials, texture, and color of the facade of a building shall be visually compatible with the predominant materials used in the historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. The following is suggested by the Defray Beach Design Guidelines regarding: Windows Design and install new windows when the historic windows are completely missing. Changing the historic appearance through inappropriate design materials or adding a finish or color that changes the sash, depth of reveal, the reflectivity, or the appearance of the frame should be avoided. Replacing viable windows rather than maintaining the original should be avoided. Shutters Window shutters that are removable are preferred. If the tracks are to be installed year-round, they should be painted to match the exterior surface. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation suggest the following: The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. 220 NW 2nd Street-Replacement windows Page 3 Analysis The proposed replacement windows and storm protection are part of an overall repair scheme of the building which is being jointly funded by the City of Delray Beach and the Community Redevelopment Agency. The applicant proposes the replacement of all the windows in the house except the ground floor windows on the front façade as they were replaced a number of years ago. A COA application for their replacement could not be found. The existing aluminum framed awning windows are not the original windows and their design is inappropriate for this style of building. While there is no evidence to show the design of the original windows, the proposed 6 over 6 single hung windows are in keeping with this style of dwelling and period of construction. Although wood is the most appropriate material for the proposed windows, the installation of aluminum frame windows can be supported as the original windows do not exist on the building and the installation of a more appropriate design will improve the appearance of the dwelling. It is essential that the depth and profile of the muntins are consistent with the profile that is normally provided with a wood framed window, therefore, a condition of approval is that a muntin profile is submitted which provides the appropriate depth and profile. The applicant has not stated the proposed color of the new window frames or whether clear glass is to be used. A further condition of approval is that clear glass is installed in the windows. Although the tripartite windows on the ground floor of the front façade were replaced in the past and are in good condition, the applicant should consider replacing the central sections with 6 over 6 single hung aluminum frame windows and the four sidelight windows with casement windows of an appropriate design. The installation of the proposed removable storm panels can be supported as they are the least obtrusive form of storm protection and conform to the recommendations of the Design Guidelines. As the tracks require minimal hardware, there is little concern that the installation could irreparably damage the exterior of the building. However, in order to camouflage the tracks, a condition of approval has been added to paint the tracks to match the color of the building. Based on the analysis above, positive findings with respect to the LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8)(c) and (g), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation can be made, subject to the above conditions. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the COA for 220 NW 2nd Street by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and (c) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach 220 NW 2nd Street- Replacement windows Page 4 1 Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to conditions. C. Deny approval of the COA for 220 NW 2nd Street by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and (c) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. RECOMMENDATION Move approval of the COA for 220 NW 2nd Street by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and (c) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: 1) That a muntin profile is submitted which provides the appropriate depth and profile that is provided with a wood framed window. 2) That clear glass is installed in the windows. 3) That the tracks for the removable storm panels are painted to match the color of the building. Attachments:Location map,photographs,window and shutter details Report Prepared by:Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner Mr • MARTIN r >. . . Nu .. IN LUTHER ma an EN um NI imi KING JR mo all 11111 1111 DRIVE 00r 9tt Ltt 90t J sa • Lil VACANT w w > NC w > : NC NC > NC NC 1 2! > >Q Q - Q NC Q 4 NC Q 194r1 _mFirri 0 1�rrfrl J a NC r - r���r 4 NC �i i5 [ `" NC NC r ��rl� NC HOUSE r• y�•��♦ n r' ❖•:••*** NC = -19a 1926 • ••••♦ J• o 1 �� •ST. PAU - NC • r •CH NC VACANT Q •••••••• ,rrr"'riII�. iiii�•ii• ' Z ST, PAULS ••••• �� N PARKING ,,,-:o ii• 1920,� t924f NC VACANT LOT •••••••♦ _ NC •••••••- ••i••••••44, VACANT NC •NC •••••••O 1902 a VACANT OOOO••i•♦ 1948 0 o NC NC ° o NC H 1` , f I- N rSfc NC r r��r� r� o NC NC (J 1926tj, VACANT NC z a 401 317 ±1515 r •, M ' illi N.W. 1ST ST_ Ilk NC a I ►•• i�••i.••i•• I m MASONIC�!��• .•p•j`•%`i VACANT , • LODGE !'N••4`0••0••••Q• 0 - , N C Z• `•44 MT. OLIVE CHURCH•��� VACANT VACANT § .•. O* VACAN7 t•-• �•�•••• 19 VACANT Z 2 O �••• ❖:••� z 3 6 z I PARKING VACANT �� LOT 2 , 8 VACANT IJ �� VACANT I 1 MT, OLIVE , ; ^� PARKING LOT v VACANT ■ rr r NC ■ FIRE I VACANT • VACANT TENNIS STATION a VACANT VACANT NO. 1 q... i. I. .I■ me .. .. . 1 _ - STADIUM ATLANTIC AVENUE I- w w / Q > Q POLICE SOUTH i I i 1- COMPLEX COUNTY o CD to I COURT N §' HOUSE LAN Ui .1 • N WEST SETTLERS HISTORIC DISTRICT LEGEND: REVISED: DUNE 2001 O K.:.i.••Al PLANNING DEPARTMENT :�0.4...44:44:4 MI MI Ill all In CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL BLOCK NUMBER HISTORIC SITE CONTRIBUTING HISTORIC BOUNDARY (NON-CONTRIBUTING) -- DIGITAL BASE MAP SYSTEM -- MAP REF: LMA16 Ni r e Inspection Record Elevations Note the following on each elevation: ❑All exterior doors and windows O Material types O Important architectural details 0 Direction of view O Floor-to-floor heights 0 Drawing scale Supplement with exterior photographs as appropriate t m.:�s�tssse 11111111111111111 1♦� _ tx ate" a \�' - ,i•-•.(- „...._?.,„...4'..-4__,,ke- E:=--_-_ ------ -__ ----i.,..„„ika-- , _t;',,,Iii ---- / :„. �r- , "`: f-I.-.L'.-...'?:: . m.--7,.-.4.,.,...r'5 gm.' :It'iNt.'. ----i ::::-"':":'-'-1-_*.f i `f: .�. + ,� ell r= -:.sr's-_! 1„,,ii ,..,..77=7.---1._„___, ...,„ _,.:;,..., _,..-..„,- is fit° - '-! '.',.2,. -„ 11- �;-- --_ " - •� 'w ,L SL y'.'.s / . ins 1 I /�!!//s/11>ela� ■/!!/l!!/,//!!////!/// �ll0[l�>11l1�; 1�® ® �lA>a® R11111E/11!!!!1 North View—Front I■/!!!//!/!/!!//!!/■!!/■/1 1/aaaas/a;a aaaaaaaaawa!`a:aaaaaaaa®aaaaaaaaaaaajal/!®!s/o/onamasiciaawassmannamaanai East View ////■//■//////!!�®aiaaa!/®�� u s.Ci \ a ..'at :�n / _l. Z - h'''`_�"s % - `:--- .... _^.„--- ice.-'AI.: t.,.!- p j'.• a / `` a�' '� -"-r.+ k�,�'"'" --- • it e �. r SL4• .� r . ®.,s.-,�` I 1 -f,- 1� h�^-' =.;•"3s - ,r&c' . �'^'-,• -,.''a per "..� _ f '8. � 1 rt .. $'{'7"�'__ —. .- _ 7 - _ °*..ra" tt x "' .�`'',,--,.." ,`"Sti.fir;,,.., Inl ..'a, -Ci 2 r � 1fi iA .•M• ""•rR „+-..,�ca..rytX�S"'<.`''i�.,`"w.' • it! tM: tl j I�•. $ rX T.ST 3 l ��.! +v,.3,t2 ,�Vkl 3 .'... T ..�. � a � vc ._a s t x i rmrria �.ti ;1/ ••IIr:••:•mmin.1•111M lsirt//Ya101'i/!/1 ilia// i/!i/ l®mow - ~ "` 1/i !lido'■//'m=�t..�....MsM sa aria South View—Rear JffffIll10011111110 I taaaaaaaaaaa s //! IWestView3161/1161.1 ■■/!!//■!// 0 . . . . . 'i.. . (....°°.........n........." I 101I ._ 1 a .... .... N. --, II 1 = • ,=., ,.., I (CI ) —L. —1--- I , r' ........^ ,F. . ryi° 4 I I Ref/iee rste.v," . . . / . .!,... ,.; . -:- §'4,1? . . . , , DEIRAYBEACH - DEIRAYBEACH d HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD 11r. MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT '�II�� 2W1 1993 2W1 Agent: Peter Dwyer Project Name: Historic Del-Ida Park House III Project Location: Lot 3, Dixie Del-Ida Plat ITEM BEFORE THE BOAR© The item before the Board is a request for approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the construction of a new single family residence at Lot 3 Dixie Boulevard, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H). BACKGROUND The property consists of Lot 3, Dixie Del-Ida Plat and is situated on the southeast side of Dixie Boulevard between Swinton Avenue and NE 2Hd Avenue. The 0.24 acre property is presently vacant and is zoned Single Family Residential (R-1-AA). The lot is situated within the Del-Ida Park Historic District. At its meeting of June 2, 2004, the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) reviewed and recommended approval to the City Commission of a request to re-plat Lots 2-5, Block 5, Del-Ida Park in order to accommodate the construction of three (3) new, single-family residences in addition to the retention of a contributing single family dwelling (four lots total). The HPB also recommended approval to the City Commission of waiver requests regarding the minimum lot dimension requirements for the lots proposed to be created via the aforementioned re-plat. Along with these recommendations, the HPB approved a demolition request for the aforementioned garage, and a variance for the reduction of the side interior setback from ten feet (10')to five feet(5')to allow the retention of the extant historic dwelling. The Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval of the Dixie Del-Ida Plat as well as the associated waivers at their meeting of June 21, 2004. Subsequently, at its meeting of July 6, 2004, the City Commission denied the request to re-plat Lots 2-5, Block 5, Del-Ida Park as well as the associated waivers regarding the minimum lot dimension requirements based upon a finding that the proposed lots were inconsistent with the surrounding development pattern and would adversely affect the neighborhood. At its meeting of October 6, 2004, the HPB recommended approval to the City Commission for an application to subdivide the non-conforming Lots 2-5, Block 5, Del-Ida Park into three (3) conforming lots while still retaining the extant historic dwelling. The City Commission approved the subdivision at its meeting of November 2, 2004. The applicant is now requesting approval for the construction of a single family residence on Lot 3 of the subdivision. Meeting Date:April 20,2005 Agenda Item: III.C. Lot 3 Dixie Del-Ida Plat Construction of a single family residence a Page 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposal is to construct a 3,178 square foot 2-story single family residence. The first floor living area contains 1,945 square feet and consists of a living/dining room, library, great room, kitchen, utility room, guest bedroom and cabana. Also on the ground floor are: a 140 square foot entrance porch, a 459 square foot double car garage, and a 208 square foot lanai. The second floor contains 1,233 square feet and contains a master bedroom with master bathroom, two further bedrooms, and a bathroom. The dwelling is designed in the Mediterranean Revival style and is of concrete block and stucco construction. The roof has multiple pitches with clay barrel tiles and no overhang at the eaves, and the windows and French doors are aluminum framed with impact resistant glass and 7/8" muntins. It appears as if there are a mixture of casement windows and sash windows in the building; however, no details have been submitted. The asymmetrical facade of the property faces to the northwest and is stepped back at a number of points, particularly at the second story level. The garage is to the front of the property but is set back behind a porte-cochere to lessen its impact on the facade. The windows to the front facade are arched on the first story and rectangular on the second story with varying patterns of divided lights. The facade of the building has a number of ornamental details including an ornamental door casement consisting of two pre-cast stone Doric pilasters supporting an architrave, all of which are ornately detailed. The first floor windows have pre-cast surrounds while those on the second story have a smooth stucco surround. Above the first floor entrance is a balcony with a wrought iron handrail in the center of which is an ornamental metal medallion and supporting the facade arcade is a pre-cast spiral column with a Corinthian capital. There are also decorative lighting fixtures at either side of the porte-cochere (details attached), a circular louvered vent over the library window, and "sunbrella" awnings over three of the second story windows. The side elevations (southwest and northeast) are plainer in appearance although the second story of the southwest elevation contains a Venetian window and the northeast elevation has a dummy chimney. The rear elevation is also relatively plain although there are 3 archways leading to the lanai, a "sunbrella" awning over one of the second story windows, and a large tri- partite window on each story. The body of the house will be white in color and the barrel tile roof of the house will be terracotta. The front and garage doors and the window frames will be stained dark brown, and the "sunbrella" awnings will be green and white stripes. The front and rear yards will be landscaped with the front walkway to the house comprising of brick pavers. No details of the type or color of pavers has been submitted. A swimming pool measuring 30' x 15' is proposed for the rear yard; however the location of the pool equipment has not been indicated. This must be shown on the plans. A 4.5' high Ficus Hedge and a pool fence will enclose the rear yard with access from the front being through two 4.5' high wooden gates at either side of the dwelling. The gate to the southwest is attached to block and stucco gate piers with the one adjoining the garage curving up in height from 4.5' to 6.9' The proposal also includes associated landscaping for the new development. A number of existing trees have to be removed from the site including a Norfolk Pine, two Sabal Palms, a dead Citrus Tree, and a number of Oaks. Existing trees and new trees are included in the Lot 3 Dixie Del-Ida Plat Construction of a single family residence Page 3 proposed landscape plan. The trees comprise of 1 Gumbo Limbo, 1 Clustering Fishtail Palm, 2 Coconut Palms, 1 East Palatka, 1 Frangipani Tree, 1 Live Oak, 1 Purple Glory Tree, and 4 Montgomery Palms. A number of shrubs, groundcovers and accents are also proposed, and these include Cocoplum, Ficus Hedge, Dwarf Firebush, Pink Ixora, Dwarf Date Palm, Indian Hawthorn, and Cat Palm. SITE PLAN:ANALYSIS,;:, COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. LDR Section 4.3.4(K) Development Standards Matrix: The applicable development standards for the R-1-AA zoning district that relate to the proposal are as follows: Required Provided Building Height (max.) 35' 25.5' Building Setbacks (min.) - Front 30' 30' Side Interior southwest 10' 10' northeast 10' 10' to building 8' to chimney* Rear 10' 10' to pool 41.6' to dwelling Maximum Lot Coverage 40% 26.21% Open Space 25% 27% * Chimney Setback The chimney on the northeast elevation encroaches approximately 1.6' into.the side interior setback and does not, therefore, conform with LDR Section 4.3.4(K), Development Standards Matrix. The chimney should be redesigned so it does not encroach into the setback. LDR Section 4.6 Supplemental District Regulations Walls, Fences, and Hedges /� Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.5(C), walls, fences, or hedges located in a required front yard or street side yard shall not exceed six feet (6') in height. Walls, fences or hedges located in a required interior side or rear yard shall not exceed eight feet (8') in height. The proposed wing wall (gate pier) to the southwest of the dwelling rises from 4.5' to 6.9' in height where it adjoins the garage and conforms with this section of the LDRs. Lot 3 Dixie Del-Ida Plat Construction of a single family residence Page 4 The proposed Ficus Hedge to the sides and rear of the property will be 4.5' high at planting. Within the hedge will be a pool fence but no details have been submitted as to its specifications or height, therefore, fence specifications must be submitted. Off-Street Parking Requirements Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(C)(2)(a), two parking spaces are required for a single family detached residence. The proposed dwelling has a double car garage measuring 20'2" by 20" and therefore complies with this section of the LDRs. Swimming Pool,Whirlpools , &Spas / Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.15, all private or family type pools shall be enclosed by a fence or other enclosures so that the premises upon which the pool is located is enclosed from adjoining yards or property. The proposal includes a 4.5' high Ficus Hedge and pool fence around the rear yard with access from the front yard gained by two 4.5' high gates. The proposal therefore conforms with this section of the LDRs. Right-of-Way Dedication Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.1(D)(2), and the Transportation Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan, the required right-of-way width for Dixie Boulevard is 60'. Currently 70' of right-of-way exists for Dixie Boulevard, therefore, no dedication is required. Sidewalks Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.3(B)(1), a 5' wide sidewalk is required within the right-of-way \I adjacent to the property. An existing 5' sidewalk currently runs along Dixie Boulevard to the northwest of the property, therefore the proposal complies with this section of the LDRs. If the sidewalk is damaged with construction of the proposed structure, the developer must replace the sidewalk. Utility Pole Relocation The site survey shows utility poles to the front and rear of the property, however, they are not shown on the submitted plans. The pole to the front of the property is outside the development site; however, the guy wire and anchor of the pole to the rear extend into the development site. Therefore, the poles, guy wires, and anchors must be shown on the proposed plans and copies of the letters from the utility providers agreeing to any relocation of the poles must be submitted as part of the building permit application. It is further noted that all utilities servicing this site must be placed underground. Technical Items: The following Technical Items must be addressed with the submittal of revised plans prior to building permit submittal: 1) Details of the window opening mechanisms must be submitted. 2) Details on the type and color of the driveway pavers must be submitted. 3) Pool fence specifications must be submitted. Lot 3 Dixie Del-Ida Plat Construction of a single family residence Page 5 4) The chimney should be redesigned so it does not encroach into the setback. / 5) That the poles, guy wires, and anchors are shown on the proposed plans and copies of the letters from the utility providers agreeing to any relocation of the poles are submitted as part of the application. 6) The plans must indicate the location of the pool equipment. Section 4.6.16 Landscape Regulations: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.16(H)(1)(a-g): (a) One shade tree shall be planted for every 2,500 square feet of lot area. Shade trees for single family residences may be a minimum of eight (8) feet in height with a three (3) foot spread at the time of installation. Existing trees on the site may be credited toward this tree requirement. (b) Shrubs shall be installed along the foundation of the side of the residence that faces any street. (c) All air-conditioning units shall be screened with shrubbery or wood fencing. (d) All other lot areas not covered by driveways or structures shall be planted with lawn grass, ground cover or other approved landscape materials. (e) The area between the property line and the edge of the pavement of the abutting right- of-way shall be sodded or landscaped with ground cover acceptable to the City Engineering Department. Rock or gravel is expressly prohibited from being used in the right-of-way, unless approved by City Engineering. (t) All refuse container storage areas visible from an adjacent street must be screened with vision obscuring fencing or hedging. A vision obscuring gate must be used in conjunction with hedging. (g) All landscaped areas shall be provided with an irrigation system, automatically operated, to provide complete coverage of all plant materials and grass to be maintained. The source of water may be either from City water or non-potable water. The use of recycled water is encouraged. IN The proposed landscape plan has been reviewed by the Landscape Inspector and the following comment is provided, which must be addressed prior to issuance of a building permit: 1) The previous comment regarding the replacement of the Adonidia Palm to another species has been addressed; however, the landscape plan shows a Dwarf Date Palm as the replacement while the submission letter states a Gumbo Limbo. This should be clarified. The City Horticulturist has stated that a Dwarf Date Palm would be suitable for this location. Lot 3 Dixie Del-Ida Plat Construction of a single family residence Page 6 ANALYSIS. Design Elements LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(a-c), (E)(8)(g), (E)(8)(h), and (E)(8)(j) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: The Board Shall Consider: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(7) The construction of new buildings or structures, or the relocation, alteration, reconstruction, or major repair or maintenance of a non-contributing building or structure within a designated historic district shall meet the same compatibility standards as any material change in the exterior appearance of an existing non- contributing building. Any material change in the exterior appearance if any existing non-contributing building, structure, or appurtenance in a designated historic district shall be generally compatible with the form, proportion, mass, configuration, building material, texture, color, and location of historic buildings, structures, or sites adjoining or reasonably approximate to the non-contributing building, structure, or site. (E)(8) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: (a) height, (b) front façade proportion, (c) proportion of openings (windows and doors), (d) rhythm of solids to voids: front facades, (e) rhythm of buildings on streets, (t) rhythm of entrance and/or porch projections, (g) consistency in relation to materials, texture, color, (h) roof shapes, (i) walls of continuity, 0) scale of a building, and(k) directional expression of a front elevation. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation recommend that: (a) New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. (b) New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. Conclusion The proposed two-story single family dwelling is designed in the Mediterranean Revival style and reflects a traditional style of architecture found within the Del-Ida Park Historic District. The design includes many features associated with the Mediterranean Revival style including cast Lot 3 Dixie Del-Ida Plat • Construction of a single family residence Page 7 stone ornament around the façade doorway and windows, an arcade, and a porte-cochere yet it can be recognized as a modern building through the use of modern materials. However, there are some concerns with regard to the structure's height, front façade proportion, and the scale of the building. Concerns over these issues have also been raised by owners of neighboring properties who have submitted letters (copy attached) stating their objections to the proposal. As indicated in the table below, within this section of Dixie Boulevard, the majority of the dwellings are small, single story structures with floor areas ranging from 664 square feet to 2,381 square feet. The proposed dwelling will have two stories, a frontage of 55', and a total floor area of 3,178 square feet making it the largest structure in this section of Del-Ida Park. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(a), the height of proposed buildings shall be visually compatible in comparison or relation to the height of existing structures and buildings. The proposed 2-story dwelling will be 25.5' high while the majority of the other dwellings in Del-Ida Park are single story dwellings. Furthermore, LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(b) states that the front façade of each building or structure, shall be visually compatible with and in direct relationship to the height of the front elevation of other adjacent or adjoining buildings within a historic district. The adjacent properties (106 and 118) are both one story and have a frontage of 24' and 34' respectively compared with the proposed 55'frontage of the proposed dwelling. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(j), the size of a building, the building mass in relation to open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, and porches shall be visually compatible with the building size and building mass of historic sites, buildings and structures within a historic district. The proposed building is greater in size and mass than the adjacent buildings and the majority of the buildings in the Del-Ida Park Historic District. However, there are two existing two story dwellings at 125 Dixie Boulevard (1928, Mediterranean Revival, contributing), and 515 North Swinton Avenue (1925, Mediterranean Revival, contributing). The two story dwelling at 125 Dixie Boulevard has a total of 1,748 square feet and a frontage of 38', and 515 North Swinton Avenue, has a total floor area of 2,289 square feet and a frontage of 36'. Street Number Floor Area Stories Date Built Frontage 11 1,874 1 1931 30' 19 970 1 1925 30' 23 1,300 1 1953 45' 101 2,080 1 1939 52' 109 664 1 1948 28' 125 1,748 2 1928 38' 2 1,377 1 1945 43' 14 983 1 1930 31' 102 2,381 1 1948 56' 106 1,136 1 1925 24' 118 1,230 1 1930 34' Lot 3 (Proposed) 3,178 2 55' The stepping back of the building on the second story, has contributed to a reduction in the overall mass and the roof pitch is relatively shallow; however, there are other ways in which the mass can be further reduced and the front façade proportion improved. It was suggested to the applicant that the overall scale and mass of the building could be reduced by lowering the Lot 3 Dixie Del-Ida Plat Construction of a single family residence • Page 8 Xoverall height, removing the dummy chimney (which presently extends into the setback) from the northeast elevation, and moving the porte-cochere back towards the garage or removing it completely. The applicant responded by stating he believes the present design meets the intent of the Historic Preservation Guidelines and wished to present the project for review. YIf the proposed design is approved, there are concerns that this could set a precedent for future development proposals for the Del-Ida Park Historic District resulting in property owners applying to build larger and larger buildings. This would ultimately lead to a loss of the district's historic character. There are also concerns that, if approval is given, the applicant will apply to extend the contributing historic building on Lot 2 (thus leading to a loss of its contributing features), and apply to construct an even larger new dwelling on Lot 1 facing NE 2nd Avenue. . / It is noted that the central arched section of the second floor Venetian window on the southwest elevation and the central rectangular sections of the tripartite windows on the first and second floor of the rear elevation appear plain compared with the other windows due to the omission of muntins and glazing bars. Consideration should be given to applying muntins and glazing bars to these windows. It has been stated that the applicant wishes these windows to retain their proposed design.- Overall, the building is well designed in terms of its architecture and meets the requirements of the LDRs, subject to a number of minor technical items which have to be addressed. There is concern, however, as to whether it is appropriate for this section of the Del-Ida Park Historic District and, if approved, the damaging precedent it may set. Based on the analysis above, positive findings can be made with respect to LDR Sections 2.4.6(H), 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), and 4.6.16(H)(1)(a-g), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, once the conditions of approval have been met. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the COA for Lot 3, Del-Ida Plat by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(H), 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), and 4.6.16(H)(1)(a-g) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to conditions, subject to conditions. C. Move denial of the COA for Lot 3, Del-Ida Plat by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(H), 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), and 4.6.16(H)(1)(a-g) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. RECOMMENDATION; -* Move approval of the COA for Lot 3 Del-Ida Plat by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Lot 3 Dixie Del-Ida Plat . Construction of a single family residence Page 9 Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(H), 4.5.1(E)(4), (E)(7), and (E)(8)(a-k), and 4.6.16(H)(1)(a-g) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to conditions, subject to the following conditions: 1 1) That the overall height Df the-building-isiessend 2) That the proposed chimney be either removed or relocated to comply with the building setback requirements. 3) That the porte-cochere is set back 10'from the front facade or removed completely. 0/1,1AUTL1 "--1r ( Attachments: Survey, Site Plan, Proposed Elevations, Floor Plan, Lighting Details, Letters of Objection Report Prepared by: Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner .1 - i( 4-51t‘ w Y v i \, j/ 11, \ 1 ( 0 5 )\ P :i,h___...... ....------- 1446,./J-- • , / ' (-- j ,n ( WOW ( 7) "f LAij _......../2"0".4 7( .-......, ..._.-----6,°. LAd." / cN11 / /. / 1 ?JRD WITH \ t�\ V / 21.22 Om 447 N� ®,� ��s / ///1/4.4/// I. dV ltdt4 % t 1A 10wi 00 ,, \ �O / (/(,' t (100 \ aii N90'00'00"E 2e.00' • 4 ,+" iff .sa '-i)'6:9 I/ a wii/e °s \ I O n V . }? G0, >, +r N Q 21/ e.. OUP,.0 9 tocturttot• c0 cIf,,, �. 9�s \ 1 V / / \�cF T�r \ ,�� +e / / \ 'e'itwt t��aaar ) �,•;F / Ili\ .011 in Q /fie / / \ ` �`i'cwa'm \ \ ;�i I , / • s2.2a' o '� U a / it 6A / \ , �,� i•QtIQRJt \ C 0 N C R E T E z,.e� r ,v 1134 1D00 c• 1001 etlN ONt \ \ 0 1 STORY o 4 0 • , ,G..... + ei tat OAK As \ „'� CBS �— ."~ ®ti+t + NhD OSO \ \ I FINISHED ELEVATIONFLOOR 0 21. I 41140 w +a�+ eId O d+ \ tat IIOIMOUf / / aim .p w /I // \• , \ a / N CO•MI ® i �' eta, _ \,. 1Jt \ �S¢ awl \ SF \ �� LIN1N1 SLAB40 \ �\' �> ." +t,.t \ /0�0 p \1 50.00' " 25. o' I a No \ / S7 O MOOR \ w,Yr Q0 I r +_•(, +gyp / DEL.-I PARK �,��' '"'° \ "� x"V (Do ,�51 \ (PB 9, '\2, PBCR) ,�' *4,0NVl �� DEL-IDA PARK \ ki ,C0 0�� (PB 9, PG 52, PBCR) 1�1 r • a�DREdoa7oO ,. - • DESII3M PQLLLaETENS . .i1l�„ ~'I�v ,, .DEC IMP CNA,LIA ITCRP,11-Y OCCP•ANOY TABLE SOC.t'•Apnocral ••-•••--' ,,NI7■A■-•A- - U1�R0TECTO0 I010.0.0.1tD LIMTED TO TW 5TOIN.AND.000 on N 1000 SP.PM FLOCK F • �/� n 111ND LOADS AL KK ROK DA MOLD W COOL.Mr [rune 0.00,11 PI : Z, .T;,i.) CODE COITION n ame'.A,Ledo 7C0/ c..1a I.L.Put K ll��:: I BOLD,.DEICIIED Y. INCLO.0 n..R ROD. R w4" ru � WYD E..ONJ1E!CLAeID1CdTl01. D ,craft. N:rw... • 4: wND e•TCO Deelew .ac um„.w>....a�•,•, ':'.i I 6 wome..R c 1 .T NTTII1,2 NALP e/L1¢G4E+ICIER+ IPiro ; GI. l/ 1! I nt _or.. no _�s , 7�t� L4.POE LOAD. )o MY n�d d I d .... • • • mo.+ r A i,kh � ��.k `���j.,:11.111.0...kw,�l -' • I 14 � FLOOR 0xE .000 DC.LOAD. s o 1-... 7 ....... T.1'Lrl) M�iWP"_ ''I i��i-�•_�e�I -r--,<', r- _ .• -V rill I ...era!MITT!!/1 11111edlti:RM-1I-Il0.1115�y�/!F :a..-_I� f�l! WILDING u0P0o, Te I S 1' pm.rM. . SOW _ SN60,MANI.T•RIIR.a• PIT rMO ;? I a I T.nw Wm In1I_L ;gooey M ALT KE//T.WT A/M`TL.'� vE1 �J f 1 AYY YI goon +i S AUN,LOAD 1•Arx IwtlNO DO St ^ 111 • I '7m�� AIQ CCY,r+Pm11 1 C.L.P. .le !y[1� [■ • S�w..LaO j,■` I_I_J r ■ ■ I K DETAIL/ntlJIDED 1 I�to•i' .1 1: • •• i i• CPNMII SA0...M MRO.C.. P.Wn NI®D.11 NV NC .•010 . - • -"} F ,.r, TOE A•wl.IIKr ma P Om MIRL.011K S MA.AT.' _ :1. .� Y tit Y41/rx t•w1.4T,v 1unb NO w vuwa Len 4I. 11011.0110 n • //� L IIIIIIII IIIIIII /, x 1 •/�� LDS,.N•Y ro NR.Y MOAl.LD1Y CV T.e11tl.K 4m i y ./1 I 11 -l /^. ?i'tilr ;' � ,014 eaw..P.u.vA,a1Am • -i v..Y /j /./ �� .y��'-4 3 K0.TOE I.N A. 0.11.1d W.V.104Y'L O a woo �6 a - % ' Yal4Ri-l-t444yrt .; Q QC Ilf ..,.6 ` • 4Dl4kl!l I_I_I_I_I_I_ISIIIIIIMIISISISISIIIIIIE11�1 N.RDsace q vq,R I .- • •1ograr•rodw� , .•. .... 1 n :� b 6...Nw is w 1.... .V./1.•n.�WWn1D4 u.14 i n� nn n m ..l;:: .fm,r._iC...li.-� Ir 1 ill,,, r....� ..1.�. �Qdd L�EC�LbD ! -1 °°❑°❑ - fJ� LIuLJCJIJU�C� I .M4/K pNLYKW.p11rx�NpEDRp. C � . �!� Ui 1RILOI•CWALL T� =PALLADVORULO f�]C' f=1L�[_JL7l.:.lf_ i=7❑ >'; 0 Q X 1 mairiDtte,,t _,74.4TE1IED DR.P'Ec w.rt ., .. v U 0 • 1 OTM WALL . 1Eu1K A/NORO I UG 3E III' 1ip���piEDfq,7.. i If �1 L KAM,, NdlATED WW1 PALL • - OOG9S4aMC©TUOG9 NOTES, SPGCCOFIC©QT©bS MD GENIE &L HIECOIRC MC b4S 069C-J 7IHO IIaDD EK ' US S l I , Ale,Li118 £SARIN 1.1111.11, £1*lOSS PaCt4A'IMA CARPpJ}RY, ATR{JCTURKL IR.°M aVOL 41010111. 11014.1.1PWK rOIRA C0411110.LNWNYWCWMRVL IOII CP}ACION MD LAW WAR.010 bi0010 0100CN A11�LDSS1 OW I LK COMPTW.1 W1.1®(Iq'P1 NqL NM 41PYW1.11.0 4CO1l.YMWcl. an,n I.ATWNON M.O.. NWI/1 I0001ROCO1 04410 KR MU.A,N YARAKNI,IURR R40*1110 VDOI I,M YIR.KO LL40 . N1N nTWTMIL VLRI POW DUPNY/.YR1Y Me MP. SWEET - IM IMP-rRC4OMS I0 P.R.Rg xCO..C,d E KV.Irpe YYV.I IN10.011,C11701 bRpMILYod 110.WPM YnNM+Mm MR4YYtlK YKW N¢L FY6T r4W1IlM I Wm111G KR l01D 13000OFW1 NK NKUW.e CORM L co w woo RRNO.YE KW M CMgKrtT11 WAOn 0INe rN.P.0011•MTGTd..LL RIM TOM N,q Ap .IgLnW IIYGT4NRV•O RANI K...0,01.0 M01er. ON.1.p'IDV.11.bODe1AeRDDR1 R..R ION .IRONY/11m�bn11.11.10 MO PL./ BITE PLAT I A NOV.0.001......0.1IXNNY. MT.01TO M1'.."Cdln.. •1", NI.D 1±030.PIVCnRR,IWY1p*434 MO C. RKr O.AM M.CO AORUIM•f 10.4 APmpY04O cmwr,.Ym11.OR.•Q Y/EPCL1.MTm 0 . 1101v0.11 0411 MR ARP 11040 CLWY I`O.nDOW W1 RYCPIIInD AO A.., 0,k,0.P : wmp 1� 01*380A00 KTYLOY101103 M CMNR.MO rm..AM WAX R M.VDYW AO ANIMAL r R.Yyn 0.1 Metl..1•011 14PPMYRc �,RTVORA1d+DD1'�AOMIPNKP VKYI.AINi' NOW.TRR.RYNIPNY.YTT10 ro M MC.=PD1 R1w. D.KOK.12.Mm M.MALL RxAp0IrNP.R.. , bNVAL Y CO.KrD 10WKOMO PCC,d 00.PINS roAWINO ,owYPR0000l R 0VN RI W01 ROCLMtN KCPO.1YMM Pol... ICO ITRCMK 1101.1RK CODE A CIOTIEQ°.TILORQIL SI STRUC4(LII M. oVK1,R+ AL ORM CEI 0L.Y1w POD MOT TM 1N4lR 1 RQ VM Dwcn.l41 W U 001NARTM O AMOIO /CCDOMxf Mal lA1.O a.c CCK O.CM4/mLR41 OC.Nu4..m0w 0eO*10T AR103tO O' MGM qto R RODEO 14 M 00 NMY-11d CPK.W iO YM MLRGT0141.M1 E116 TlW 1101 COIlSE1 N� i •ARO0n101.11 R 410)1± 3 Il1TxM .0.. r4CO.K,O....,..1nOR.Yrd N.°.1.0 v1 RNIDW.1.03T OW.1100111000 NM INK P EK /001,1 MA AKO011M OP VIVO PR bMNEC*C4Td A400 ORICI 0 O0.b,*D ALL 1TM TO WKI 41 ARV..OM CAT 40 [OY,.4450314 Y MYO TO M MwxgY.YS KOWA AY IADMATA.TO MIMI MAY.=W.YIRY 001*1114.AO I PM,Kra.MOO ODIWRC WK. OOP COY P RAT IIRT.1•0 All OOP AO MA 1KM1NLLI A9.9 TITLEP1.60T C�, _1l1LF" NYOID LKWRT OP MIP0 IK1YLLR CU..ICI .D Mt WAWA.YRgbm01Y1.N ��. RAPS RIE0PEQO*IODA D14Em.b DIK1bRp N•MERC.W A2.1 SITE RAM E--, A4 CORR0.lOI.MD•1.Y AA , OMN M R CM 141 NOP.441 R Ili.NIM O 4 KIWIAOOy110LMO WALLA,.Le 1CM MOO.5111 YIN.10 En M.t.On1 M..10•D 01 MVP. OLPw KORrtI 114000 YUVEASPI ROCIP0C MY WA ro ASA FOURCATIOR PYLE A 0ETAL'S i N M COKI 40 M C0•0.01DID..".TO M 001 I'0.CLTK,D b KON. TRY COI401CM.YLL R N a500MQ 1..11.1OL10 cocun ROM MOO ROO al.women wwllR w OP01*,M PIS P WOK ROM.AU.I..HIM 11m1 WALL AAA,A0.2 FLOOR PLANS l� U 0010 S. PVRCT'01NILl R N.00ASIS WNW..0 M R.A010 0A04p. 1.000 OIROLYU10D00 MO. DE e.ELlLTOC[1. AAA, ROOF PLAIl/PLIR^.H733 R7!¢A / r 1r�11 O.DN YNa1rt �101!•n 0.0111YI NECNGTOe FORMA.nA,C CpIErnp WO TleK1 EAYID ROM P/"A Ra'l eEaY AD MnYW1YRUNlID TMD/R ; Cl, • LO E . MAN AZ ROMA'rowo0.POW KM Cnmuad CONC./UM 111000.t.ntw/KcnurPO FM?VAL KAn COWL= D.W EMI P LIAe¢4D1YLWe.Dul WDO1 R TO R1dMR1n11.1MO R ASA A5.21LICDIR0 ELQTATIONA • I.YIwMm.TRMnOUMrt1 R1.•T APO R6D 4co..YICMn.n tPK1.10NOM TO 41 RCPIOOYO.MD IA.U.CL00 PM IMMO IROPPRT RA wKw1IXC T.ee. PUNAt 4RV.IDI bx11ta6 ASPS SCL0I410 SECTIORS/!,MALL SECTIOR110 S DETAILS ALL,VYWPWCC01. I.O4pdn P K.1••R COYE\TIRT MO MOTIMDA,OI ISO V.4YOtN0 MC PERM LNL 1M0.0.RMOO.R.W 40 KART WALL R WNb.D'OWp• �,N•LW POW 11.1191011 Q Y4LLRR,roI...,OR R,AxN ML.D.o ••• .400 LOCO MAO 1 NITRMDR04TODAW.MIMI In KIDRT•Y..000OR 4OD CN T...V11Y. M01y0O.P. AGA-OAS FLOOR/ROOF PRA222/0 FLAK;A OETALS ■ 44 KR1,e KIMM.lr 1W CPn Tam IYem b.P c.N mO,d.LOLL l T..D4m TONGESTS WIT MASONRY, DK.d Kw.vwnM.4ALR 0n,...,0.tIll m4.1 aAU TTE..or MOM 04e1.Ol...lc LT 4..neulpe A7.1.A7.2 ELECTRICAL k POWER PLAMS KR MIN D.I .vMIN,.M OMANW Win CPTD.M.Y Or rat K.OM-0.4 MOW/I ILD00.0 .1,R0M4I KC/004.. A10 cop,'Y YTPE0RUl1 p A COM-KM Ws 4l PM TWO MK 1PK MA.TO•L00( [TIMl�RTAR TRA1D0.1ARrnS MI.G.N 01113.P RE 01*10 C101.MR C001,1OTOS 7 W '71CNS: WonaT'i ccEiTw°Ow,vm.KnvI W1AL,0AILL MD RR.u,ML aoMK 1woR.N17015 Nd,I.PMP4LRu.D eLIP.4 w+RR•M 10 IV POMO 010101 ry iuNA wn M moan M IRd ro.n•n4 P 11D D. 1110010.N.101,ro KR R.O.LPI..O. L1.OWLI I'Y'A,Y•OK Oa.NTO0.001(CI.TDRYOI.A.PLO. ILACFC(10 KR IPCO00.t.1 1107Y0L PLLUX.MCC 1 0*00 AV 110131140T0 LOW. L YWJn.UPI CO.11.1 CN I14M /P..a P.PI 1'1WOn 0r;R1NDU r. .Y.O4n ;MCY..IIW YW1 RgLL 100.4.096K6 ILL OD WLLLOM. NCRGK.N 1CR 1000 CPERCtW,LYRGN RRKO IYKq,OL 1f O KCVO.D•D.rYOU WAN CO/Ycnd I4G Y'x On.d lLLe1p.14R. t'rlltei001.,.Im.,•T.000OIn.,C r.o ctD .MA TO.1 KYM,LP,CAVN Kt•L 00I YW.I..�M•rY• Il*DY01Ri NATdY.LYD01KW1'1CNEIEA T01Y ATd •' . H U' IOOOO TO M YOVITO•AT N OOI6,ot ar0101.1s NULL b1CLOD NTO10.P YATGD R M RIAL n mA1Y00 VW PM�OKr. E 1.11LLO,R 70 0OR C410R0TM[Pm.,. 1L., • a•4 1 (Lv R,Oe. .111 IW4CCKLTNN KOKO. ran.No IIA.YA4YNi ON O.:W0.111.11/1110 ON OM Y`DRNWi MORN�D. O CAI REOI COM.AR TON MID[IRO ITMAMOCARD ` . IVOWM I.MI •H•ONK PMNeCPM NVM41.•4YD.MOAN lop roRIPI Tbl,.T4•LYi.. MOLCOIYR Rn[MOOI 101I.YM{1 ROID. �1,1 Y1R.pI MTN•NCCtY,./OrONd.gi 4)'KRIR 111.1001 RM 400„OO.d,g10..R000E2 CPN01LR/.VI N4tw SAL NTRIMIITI0.IDEKYYKTRRI 1 1. .0101 Mar dCN01 400.0 1011.11IMO1T.T'Oii1111 MINA PI WI i4 41WY1l InUItOR1vI.LLIdO•Y.MmIMITbM 4tl. O.1•00.A-ON.d 0,IY1•.01 NIRVC0141 RM.. 001 KR YVI&IY10p TO Y b iWKnl,m R YYp I�(�(�(In /��,(�^t(� Cip 014141.4I.0030'CVR IGL1 Y06RawU a4RN.OITMIM 011, Yi Y MM,O..40 NO ONC1 ..N.M.•A1�R1CM WRR10*LR1RCK.AMMO O Ar Y L.OIU.PQI'f NLOOM WLLI R KUNO TRIP I OR5 AND 1111N0Ol116 COIIVUUL�ITG�1lfV U C�7 E IPr.Tlc.+4CA'...d..".II'...IATO DTdACOD.T OPP A.....t0Op.LLW AM,.T....t4 e4.YM Ir0.1f1aNIOY'.'NDIDN Ap,d YI kRRM0R.0 x10 YL4LYYRYIV ITMlM1RbY.LKAML 6D02110WkNnKRnD11'/YO,1'DC.1.010011.41 YY.D MIWP lWi�Don.LK YMCL4D1 Y0 ROIL MM.tN[R 11I OWN to NONNN alum M W+RK.A...1 mODgRr ..14 .. ....YY101040..0.. 01W*.W..1.1 R 11M. Otl..KA0g0.o00. 1T K.n3O.CM,,v,.YLL1YC.,,,...l...0.ono..p s qL •COM.YM AApOLT10/../11 NYL1.P.l ...A AAA Rw,MN1. ....00T,KRI.K PL. a worms...DV1pm RW,0.VR manse MI r P OGd YY1 1CIL AO OWT.uL 1nrOO AN PIVIONA 1 IUIP C.TCYb,.O.T7 CrPMIIb N We AIMIA 0IL110A R.IOc.0. 511±0R01N LNQOx MO COOKr UN VOL 10 MOWN WA4 R.YYR .O..DOCYR PIP,400RMAT.0 M011I4p YN ILL fi1YY1.EN.014'22R r n..MD 0N111C.d Om0N•11441Y NDI1O1w.A4YN1o01.m.A. R1y41.n.01R1x I.RUM 1MMA 4 VAA UNADI M.AL Rom.1.1ta•.1NWWW I.NIDA,1dCW IRO YTR1LPICK.E MN PI R'..SMLLTC VOOR.wK 41 M'R.tO b4lntl,YTw4R WKlMIVM>m C IOW MMI.RW leMM. OrtSHAH AIL A,TO+W*YCn01 0OM.OVYdO . 4l,miK MYIY1•aeT W4LY AG •MOE_4q 4MY,.AL AFRO MOANr. *10.1...ry.MI.A. (LWMIMS 0uTMOONMWP 5410 DSDTOS k *1.30LT1B (:•. m1MCMRK,D11ONWRMO „xn1'mPTD LLYKJYO Cuw Or Do•WNWLRRO.cn A,RmonOeanD OLLI 111mnN r4.R,D0.4 LKClCJtW VOW.Nr41 YOP RaY.M MI1,R Y,4lrnnaAv..PNNP,O MOO/0[TOIW S{IO N.AOdrEP•ALRDO.[st. IRK../1.0110.1711.1.000.....OM•P.O. rOTROO VLLRxAtIODM VNM R1I/.70RCIT.IC,STaL, 1niAt A.m.LM.Y 4Y WOO. nm LARrLLLT Am,pbroFR1ANTTOT,1O1w0.IAd 40 E.qD1.P11141001.4.MOD,TOPP erlWl.uu wTRKR :j^l DDOEMA Ay r.w.YIAIL CCKITYMM Ra.Rrert.nA NMTP4WIP NYe.VJ.Re0Ug1m bD0K1R0 YI„Ttl10Ir.,1eC IO P.MR.NLL 0.10.CORR.waM1,,Poe4 VOW MY Y•AWN RN.W14Td AT Se Moll R000CVF.W PomP.R/Inch n.S20S� B I+ ORM N4DYO rRKTQ Ma R,aLW*mom COO.n.'RL.1.."IR.mR IIRONILL PIMA.WLRMALCCWYn VW K111.Na1¢ _,Qn An P0aNM140.YMLL RGVPlLT 4KD pI•M 0.tlPq WIT M410P1L1e0JYMeCOR1.0 YMMR0OY.Coca 1 4 K RMMRI,O.AD10A0■.10 P.0,04 MM10 c.o.,W011 DOM YD.WO.FCTOMO.RP"I ME I.W...V.00...000.ROM1100I RY0Rr11.O.101 roRMOM.LP w,AR1MDM MMa WAIL0310 040LLA 146Nl D.T'oN,P.S.Y. O I.WOW 10 0.1TRerol N.Cr4O NMe3TNP maw. MD M COMM.,AA d MOM CCO.Rm.001P11Y1Pm P9Q1415;0 1S�69A14,*1115corr reel,..4P PLWDINO PIM1Nm8: • kW TO COMP=CCM11I1411214 /K..w moms MLR PRN01.13P L MOWS .u4WK A,ubT Arou lw KVAT 4L pp AP.IY MD pea 1 al.K4a WADI AKA ONO 4m.1.1....T1LTw TAR 06{-WS-P101 : NM 0v1.111.01 v gll�C 114Io0.LIM1•01/R b010 TPITUM POMP COnE1m Waif FOR"°COMM.. SECTIpJ AND OTT*ILk t P MR 1LM AO NECrUMI V MONO• CGYN IP• l KO lyeC,ONOT BUN M'I xI1=MO MT N War COO 1 eC.WOR011• 11100M0 NOD SW dK,ARAO WA WA.OAT 4L CV W4t a ypf YEIMY. rN. =.. CO-.. Ten PSI-760-{761 ww.1Ru0M411' LAD N IFalYO PKRTUN 1YNwb00.11.11 40.0 �`l.' SY"7:AY.4Ad 1R 'a•n.' ad--.. MIIX,ACI,1TP0e AN),Ame w4Nd MDRa1Rl'M 4e 1I,p9[010 /RSP1I R. TOd1*01010 00.1110' 14*ORa ITC.ON.CO,NVIK.100 WV111x1.,00M ON,MC ,T1.RDOIM ro.A.R,I401,100R J01111 YtTT1CY 4D 1,t41 AeILT TO qy..R LTIITP/t.R11ER 94D. . Date 02/01/05 uuLlRne.R OmwrA¢,Lr bNIT COMM.TO RAM P001101A•1O WALT w. v.S.M..Rwro 00w AD 1•40 ..PArD w lAe•GTm TNSiWAL MOISRWt P'ROTYCTIQJ, :..._.......................................... <1A�MuY ¢1 T,KwEA1D.w1A TO PI MU RICO dYm..OD , 1 By I CML • 111 1.1.T..+gY. PST MAM IT,1,Au1'. R41110 H4l�,KiN."CLLN Ar to, e%TW 1 411 K1NN MULL R TM I N KCO,DYCI ION YM NVCIACA d ,,,,,,,,,,,,,a a,"YfO,,......yL1R 1.LLVPKp N Y1 01 xRA1w 1.1 RP1../04,04YOT.RP01K00 STRDuTDRAL E7COaTiaSlT.a • RI 1 GOO NNA P.101PIPAL 04NUIII env.,KRIS* AT 11 Dan.,. UNM MOOR All NIR'Y 4014Oc11 W11RYlvMDA 1.A111.1.RPd11 10101 RN 04 011.01.LHIr 1/YITW.0111 PVT 114 A, 1.ITR.01V.WNWROD.VC IILO III UV R ICVO POR X14/1111•1100M0 Mt KR0.0010. A.0.7,AR�OM*OV0,R.Y MTD OTOYRIRTq TIRYL PP YR V.r0•lI„01PM,10l4. 4R1rocN KW p1RLLY wDN RIR W4lRItl.T.K.P1..41T Y ML 4RIx11lV P.r.C,OY Awu R11l 4AylM.'I� l.ynp rt4l[vig0.In0 Y4l\MOCTD 141 M1MPY:U.Nr,D IAA••02•L mum,1D0. 1 ' r6Lm YR!1IeC Y0l Mm elY.Y.OWpM CRI,MN IC VOX Yl1LLRINtlN WV P.n'.1.)MAf! YII UN W.Ol0.1iQMMtI�C/L1T,OrD D,DYII RJW.WEM.R 1 TNNRVIETm,OO.M.n YOOtD N1ATW VYYI TOR M.IiD IID E...R..wwt.PA 1w11.M'I 1 • e I PLANT LIST °e TOT OTT PLANT AND SPECp0CA2 1p4 ■ I{ I MeI AND PALnl .1 l1 �- _ N pe I o-.H..• rota raeRo L o, S a . d.rye �..,Nil caropv -'- \,r •i� \ C I oX..}'n..u• Lnrwg r�xa.r�rent : 1...1._. .% ••pry r�u cr.nr BrR�livYa T 1 } Cov.mil✓.'Green naia <ocorut P•••, S cN >.'aL)r oa.A.heavy r.,• e :••co cv+eo LX,Do oa.R <e / oRPDLR A.r Ne I " 'A a aT.r••a,•p.•.raA.0 1 I T 1 ie`.u4`r° �' rR • }X..u!.....tergP Nyr,.., 9•nI� \ !.dPIll%i�Bd iVI11Were•areitwD iR�wriOV�@:ire .024 4,r4:07' N Le ov o..'a•n,<daaa::c•0.r Ir I • 1 SOD a• I' ,.Are / % � �ifregfrgii le?"At ro ,, 4•n•,1.v .. aru r d I �,/, 94� �G" �4" 1 iG I Da,uuv9,16....1064 r✓p a 4 ay T.W L • I .. �I���I`�,�.■p�Y ®"" � r-- — — M . v . go•ry.rA rrwwgo.ry P.A./ v • UTILITY �. G// �f swig =. .,_.__�f. ---�-- A lr a i4a°i...oat.a e,y r 1 ea ENT iI� • 4181.1 OITi. �'A �C I GROy.DCOvERI AD ACCENT!• ° 1 ■ e.Y .1. :77 Rmove .•puu.D•oa AA.per owr / A A` I , '� �. DEAD CITRUS ■ ALP l - PZ {Tii � .� SvnR,1no POOL I i 0000 anyau•rv.•o.../w>.O I wD A �4 Rv m ny.. fY wave , Ili z Mr y \.��ACPPOL `: Hw.,9,r<R.'T.0.`o�D.r. .,.g m• eN.•., 1 4 A NCWOLK SL.PINE pRD b`'.:.,ry. AD • �q —�Ith� I I �_..-._. _ ._._- I n C.Y ) CappaNa<ycpR oyrw•Gees e•CaPw, 'as, I_.. me- gy��le. Ill vu3 CAT I c.,.....ea.. a.��,.,...,r •• Ill I Uv / O / � .... .ire/ N cwR v Wy ao..rM1w4'uc'o ICc<op4+, � 1. �.�>,L/, 'I, j�='A Aar i • ��•L.__._ .._.. �6 4S l cra )COD S coo...,...N,' �}orL y':,., a (D . • O✓ f`! P, y • 111 ill I I" i y: u i // o��� LOT 3 � i � q . :.;'GAR 1 w;; y., (� _I I I t Y�'iA i\ / /++.:�.� —1 -- A'=' / .! N N•.n u w..'}v «.s..,r r n.w•�r •• L-7 ,(X�i i + G :.-.. .+ \tZ� / 'u� I ,oJ .l 19A�19• ii� 4Jpcnuve �" 11I il1'I n Rer ). A. w PRA.III V I (/-ram IIlW . CN ,09.,s B { I ° �iI �I %F� I AI I : ;;i:r: :: • mo i IA Ig { .CID Tt )CID �� SPEC'FICATIpNS 1 I I I I I I I r -- a .7.4. � I 'mArnorfaNU Pw Yvw.rtl Wub.v.Io,w.,J•:..•o+o.•y h••� G I I .� Shy/ _ ''4iii,'''''•'WI' >' � T�•'a t [.;...... Yd" • .w w w«e.wwa.Rwo,e sober. I• 1 1 1 ENce Oun•ad 0...�of a.a•rtl } iI(vI' ;ror"r`Or��c�4`i° i l.a•�aLuiQw�� q�.I�dy wd.Naga.tlgPar.Ye••Im�h ; .1 E �r r..�;.RP.Y,.... as N w� a ! I I h r•vna.Im...wngva J a..x�.. a >Gb..C.f... < .912JTO.No.4xnN W.M 1.0.PA.cave d lwuµv.W..• Q ')Y awtla W ELL4,14 L taw w eR`e soot s tl.W..ad qi baa sow. ro ..a ; E. ua nq• .ppIaw.bb.n.M••Adpa • CI ri Wlryid.RRqunr.� ' .fpTC/RU91142a•,M Or J.0 i- NN,re`•••Xbpnr.NM AAvlrw• ■ F••1OR ICI�AW.Y1a.uN•dl' •cr Wntic ••.1 Fop dec.<iY Ent r gw,e.W.b.wWaa..We wa>'e w.>�iticysn••aw.Lvarw a. d r LANDSCAPE PLAN 6. ".;": a• i";0;'^:,:'. ..'^'67.nr•:g" o f{` .Il •• aeptl,,r...�gweWl4.749.,..Io wweranyy c.wt.V•W,e..0 ey uaRal.i.,,J.•06,140•dy.a to uc•• w•W,b,d.P,.4621dt• e pw YrnNW.be•n.q•yo�ax. w Y0Co." I Wy",rrn.�yw�inA y NWweN.-47..9t.lx.:a N�.°.7,Rn. j 1 dcv...uwnR,r..YNi 7 Who T T Ya NN WX.0,0 O pa..V KWrWW.wur.Yr I I L-Np SC•yPE CGLCULATICNS-SINGLE FAMILr wortE • qr��,,,,np �� ..qq �.wwa.cr wrn.;aya�q _ Lot AR.. rt, l..p...-,A.v.R,C.,“...Y M w..,...R roe:vw[J.we:.,x° C. >,'LR.,P•�ecq v✓anu•S.DRrKl.erc ., n. )W See WX� •n WY�� i PIRA,.LOT.w•TT ••. MSS fart o+.uwb 9 a'•491o...•.sow,1..rwd•pa H I...Pw.,1,66.Y W.abw..d.r ryI....1.40.1. n O. .•wwe•+.a aRwaa..R iaa+aD god a.Na. tltlolo.41,r a'Nv uyg r.•Io •Dane 1 r+.d..Wrw polo .va I , 09.19. PN.CMrto Ypw.od Wla g..un..do iyurN.poet., gpoyRL Ta.06 SrwnlY •••••'+CON.R P•RN1C ED la rt, raib cl gW✓MWlalyu.(✓•.n.f9•n to n.M po•ngw•'n M.A.[ra ,eur.ncnnRao r. ��. xDanuA WALL TaR„•Lr e,x e 1 <NY ewara.•Remaem�i��e..r•am mrt,-rw • TRcn TO noRDnal DCA ee1aR 1 Data 01II5y a• r% Tor I. Lea ArrtRD TO.nn..n cLPTN n rr.aa r»ac.c•n.uL Mara AO erns. I. rorl • ). ALL rRC61109.D PLANT SKCRS bn4L ea 44•01c.TTD.Rc.,tAC n112 mAL P.O. Than PrV.Om•n no D•orn•TRW s 1.1111•e .-... ... . A , A ALL L.w•Con{.Re.lw.uu Pw2.eeD 991.•:Sub.e1••STSr.n,./C•LeT,cALLT ill ey MJP a •rrva.Kcal lawPwD•A••R•If•.m 2 Mn IL Tar nn ROR•n TAR. PO..Dee a TR.n 2 .LL CR COT.�P••waea 99,4 ra,.a 7r0�PORnm.a 9.R.'r.r.n.WT 1 rutY.Peso-• • e.a•P•vmwr n Tw...CZ,RwT.o•••T. R C:110:VD•cr.D raw"4g TNiS 1•%• .,! «. 600 w.LL a ST,Aui•nN.a..Tan f i r. I IRRIGATION NOTES: 6,` I i • q >0e1 ra,rt..rt. a.<O 10 KW.e,..m, i n .I. II "a`"`„rec:<.,w,.'D ai:nro.::OcrcLcu °° Em;.,. ..II._I. �xa I.t,.n.vM nr..etcw,,.,.✓D D,.vr KO 404.40 cw.,,.AU.PA.ma -..I.........� • .w WALL oo,DEMIWK,LAn arruu,rra„rtA wu u ee .tm I i I I , 1 _ I a.LMc. vriTT140540.10L,.n'T OGAN...04.T 1404. 6 I I j I j Ill lVIK o.n,ANK.40 t<ee4 rr.u✓.wu.Tw exrTon 1 (•.�_tJ—_:_ C O ��— II .rxH Lartipro.t,GlnaK Mt uc<,1.A0.120 FM N¢cxnuM.e+u ruN 1,n ,rwl DEINVILLmw.rab OR<ub,r.u..eon a,lLVrJr,T<x,RACK vux S _..wi ...9_ ._.....-.._9. OK TO e..r<e rt<,s.eenw.v,e<m+n ctn e WWI reOu o0. -...z Wr1 ce traD TO.».a r., .,r L • r1.7 rUNING.,ce,aLM Lu.cer-t't,, t r— ' ` i �i_..__._._._.___.., n �I rra�vewo_'n+ ro., .o�< rcwum,'x�n e�a.WALL IN 1' I I ....,,rtt*NM uGM,AL.OnD=Maur. ,; I! of r,D� e.�w. .e.z��bw�wM.0��.aD.�__ + eon 7n ewrv,rva Do ua w.ua 4 L. nsc.,<,.T4M,ATa .a r.o C MADE II rt D.<tT.tue rD ..<O•...rt (Mr., K I I ,-11 W r, ._ :Lu1DE..,.utOTOM n..L..INW.D.<nM a OI ul ._..__... J� WONO ra.,..RTNI..401wn✓rt*,W..L IX XT TO n.,<. " sro V I ... .. __ .. ..__ r�04 NWT 04.I..a.e w<.rtO Mn..•bANitrc W WALDce OW. ATiw I r n M, .44 � e I x ,,.. tt. .,<TDea,ty..rtDD.Fr,ALLAR S p C[K IONHpLD K..NG.MAN L.WALL 4..<,r•rwN�ca..,r W.en<, / O • I° LOT3 j ta Kw.D�,�W��< ,,�.K RVu<,Wr<,.,t. O r ri-- ;I. ,,-' ; r.u..rat+.�a uu ce.an eaa.en r ne reLo.vo rvA ar O,c,<M> o Q Ut u eLr I . r !---"—J Rrorvwlcn.e<L wn,cTr nrMnecn�.,wurt>nm weanreceoeoo r Ltw.C.,.ra.1 W.1.ee rcD.n+.rtDu<.wnemy,. �`a'"T<. • O w,c.Ta„m,tDrwna<eccO.ar.r,,n WM. X. . . TA o i ! al t • t m NJ �n V�' '•pit,. t0 "• IRRIGATION LEGEND y \ — -- ...a�..� 1 g ROTOR Enos I o o i D r�) .. .,.,,.ROM»e,u,. i D. 6 z ©©� M'u �,.OMKDLW4 t O �_.b_..._... ..4.cw< 1 I M C/)F 9 B i i 1 MST NERDS $ QI ^ W 1 �i'::F3'u.,.. ,e,o.e.DO 0'MAW.a KID. raLa.c.ocu,. - F v U 0. r. O O G O rrnnw::LL n <�> ( )i:) :r(y r) r1 O O O O v',teruac. ,..< 1r�... '^ (' i) - I/hut..�I:f .. / O W 6 ,Ji .r,` S b B O m[. fZ�r, V'? / w {' : ara -I) ) n:.r, / e b D .,,a wau. 15 / �r Ur { 1.,. ,....,a ...w-a W 1 1 �Q'r' < ..__�� IRRIGATION PLAN ! e�N t, / �t -C; '��_l(♦�. (i-- • BUBBLER NOZZLES r q u "` WHOM ME.f MUG.. v -'v:� .i'CJ kS00) ('.4l'J lJ ( n 000 le �nx, i 0 EJ.. .r,..e.... � tI .',e.. .e..., VALVES . Q i.EilO R9tOe IO.•uT e.Rrr,cL[. R.,.p ROtOR rq..u.e.ww4ER 10110 CONTROL VALVEV r - & w Rr.� .`:.�C...1M.. ....sawn' i 5� H rK4;M::2 vu1ltr.awc,r:::.1..; • J I Y .71 lj- ..^ -.. .l G SLEEVES il. ':V.: (' >'�..::',;Fu'r"` a4. G l __ eV:.AO TtP.04.a.,,utw / C). - I'll.; ite !J = Dates ©7/15/05 f). / li 4:ev.: ALP.TOW TWO La-L.Lr..tw.,wr.r.t 1 By MJP 0,, il `'cam r I P — 1 • ;7J DI •XIE BOULEVARD• • e0 __ o ,,, 4 5 GWE C1t{� r. • Q � —• 9 '-T / jF y i A t I k 9.657 —I—.——-...-———I I 11.35' — _` ' • - � -n I II- STORY CBS ' �---?-b -, � l G o W Q[07 — ;� .......... c-? T p FINiSHE FLOOR = i; ' rn O - E_Evr.1'10N=23. : - -"7 r oh _ i i I • rp - - ��t I e 14.32' tyres H IL "4, I"— I�� �-1-- - 1II I 1 • IP ram_ •• } 4 _ ;g < 14;ff-1440t. 10.-e. C� - • ) L I.LJ ; 1 ✓J I 1 • • • SI . L---- G -S',,n�, v J- • + t).99 U 2jJary� c•y + 19.e5 LOT 1 6 LOT 1 7 10-1 G iFIll BLOCK R. • s ® s 11rv.vrere.vv.r...or.es v.ermr.rv11v..ovu•••r.rr.mar...o.MIirMIliu••r.aevr®vvrev-.11e1•1r.r..1•M..uacc.r..e MNIMMIGS,NS` oYD ,21 2 a {,j R A N D A L L ---. !-�1, o . HISTORIC DEL-IDA PARK ""D'� I ows STOFFT ARCHITECTS • 1 R•R•I:a I I I 1 V P rj. tm: h y earACRb:4 17I I t'�j, " I I I I I I I rn• r.O• r.•` •� T .J f+ f•r r•o r•a ..•• fro• f� } R IIII l �Lm Ilu 11 IlI M I {I 11' y!{ tlG � N11tlL R II I JII i.-, .- JIM•{, I4 N0 }M•e.DRt I J 1 ,I I. __ __ .. .•. , •< i-Fr.. -.__.I ffff +�'�' FOUNDATION NOTES am ro.NnanrlN I Fr,F 4 e a, -, I l'I j irTI 'I l I l 1TwI tec fat . finI y_I r,r1 1r r Iam_ ._ ow•• L ALL IMARW KgMe Ala 4A•CD ON•P•O' "1 -7( f I Jr::1I i" Ir,• '• II• .0 111 ue rmIeNlDnoaetuva �^ w+•i.�w�eonrP"OwT" ii r 1 1 `, r i m dld�d d� • I-'� I I L ... R. I. COLIC I ewr T I TM OP aMOOW Claire Alec , 4 �t Y%'.P••DAY•a.AD P.p., Al I I I I ^[ �I I pL 111'� I I.�'� ✓(el•CaNrruow rmARRaD MOH T TO(*FLOOR co um moat ©!.1••to G WAY 00•}P• 11 I i II Wt 1 .�: '..I�*Ye-- t4„..,, I.L T.O COLVNeeOPICATKNu0IDCR MC CCU" K•[.AO N1N t �� ' i I LCOCrlD ON eut[T Y•rOWDdTICN PLAN nl •ir4iwr rwnon ., —1 1 I a I'=. O e,01•lo4LL IOP0P•1 O 'W 111 N1PM r.i Md10.101 TAIL eroCRICATICN WIN. ♦Y1.•C4Gln.AO NM 0 - ;!� I i a wM W()I�OPltr.gR W!•,R Wk. I I POPO..DITAILe ON MO!MCAT ®INS'••....A.•OTIC.r b 1'1 N I r EL Peat eruL COLPN /COA*COLLAR �..i •.O rANCRAtt PAD e.eGRICATION NMOCR M[ O r• ,cawn.AD wT. 4 I +N-i ♦ t 1 3r _ f u"wY�Iia.n..reR rD..manw r•AD Ltoerm a.I TN1e ewteT ill v°u"W w..eonw ` r�•poo r"'e w OAes ?O ine.I.R catrttr•+n I r.a rr I,I ! d$ j raw DO Yv wro Vie• f'MR COKR r , ♦ • r 11 . x; gry d ! uwr. /-.ewree.roe © rc.e•�nxr �� "II ' Eire 1 I�1•➢LIGi�Ii�I•�. •i� .. ® ♦♦ i m %3 u i • A,. Re R •I r,o'W µ�DAe.o,w. .q Lr. = y 4 = .110131611.111.30604167746060L8': ., ry'4, •rfrt Pm rn r.4.00t I_ p • • u m r.1• I.a r•I• .L e.. ac ®r.o rn O r la _ 11.00111114w' w R ./MN r r4 �: _ __1 .M[Mw RMIOWOI LPMRtl•.NLLY At' '�' RIRR4IA •0 a Ga N0t e•r Itl r.. 'T 1 IN gCI 0• �r�n; I ] MA err vE we•.j P•AT1 >•.•.II,,1 I• RM.••.e`w..VUK DOLTeaBLD 44 AMIm 4 T+ y . 0 Il h s f (� .._.. I ...._ a Te A•.A,W. CD+* �1H11. LfCru+u n LATOJr t + L(2Li L4• -I ; •T '•'1 -^•a- >Y eA•.,b•�.eoLTe..• 4 L AA€y❑ a i. d DL ern.LA*ox jP g 4r . ,,✓••ocz I re wa A ♦ i D.7. I C i 0 1 WY'0 �♦ 1 me on. a _ r ,..„, .: f i Li J1_ r� ._ � ll [— ee .•.Y 1e/'Y Me OC1Aa• b.Y •IN III f/A••.4 J 00LTe••e•OC.ern La.CT 1;till®1 -4 I~�Y ` _ : .;�y II•` •'1'.'ll Otj ; r - I I •'Y'RIIrOK.CD nAeONRr 1YD'KAAID C.C.PAL. • I I I I ` = W ♦/ r,Rc� U ® COL.•/WOO r. CO rfe•!PoN✓we.*vire. D II AD 4 • D .. .! le ``l�--- ® a'w"'Lu Q. ! Q W PILL wICOO roI OFm,Ii .r•Tit••••MC I �•DA ! l e,,>•�.= L• r-f j, Par RCIMOClD nAeoraRr e'al•KM.CONC.C0.. IJ ll Al I •.•, /"� E•" •_/ PIT p PILL.W I.r•VFW. c. I♦ rfoee roll✓u1•e KM. ~t-r7 + I :; I GENERAL NOTES • I••1 �•,•t PILL W) Mt oRJVT W b Till•r OK i '� I ♦ i y O • ••Y'RCMVICeD MaeONRT •1t.•MIID C.C.COL. 1 ® 0 �O j' lAtl TAC a'ONPLLIDWfeOO MrLRC D H F r--YII Co p COL.W Ln.KRr. cn 11000 rTU V(u R'1 NM. a T /J[• — V '� g' �' 6 PILL✓3000 roI MOD •/•Tin•e•OK L 6) © ■, .L \ !7 rim OAn NO..Dx••40.0.0.1M ` I`u wranw ■ e•.•'ra. DcacCOL. — • I. ahil •.,•I .1,104111121111 a OI/}a'I �^--1 i s.0 rum au canetoM won :' V�4 •'.W PO MO CbC COL. _.• `I L J" ` . ee ,-- (femo roll✓,,,SSKRr. CIA MN (woe rou.,(•1SS KRT. .^�,-.2 {- •} RRRI w/��/I�1 p3 .:.n� W•l NaRrrtl••'OK .onte•ro,D .1' I i F I, I 1-� : I /-`may W V 1 Q d !J• ., tt ,..,. .Y I I �, f g4 i_ J CIO r•'� I •i.MO'CM/BLOCK Ifu,., - Vat,PE•POIC ZO r14M11RT n I I I I 1 Y t r _-i \ F 4 W(]lero KRi. CIs 1�1 �1r•y �L L-- _J T. lIH I I f LL W fODO PoI ORWT PI�"i/rjOA�O MI OI�C)'nT ± J _ , - ( li r Ctt ..4%•1RrOIClOnAeLNRT •k••nAR•VI.'JD rueG.RY '� I I7MII1 --L] - "•)1 - ti r,,�..a-���. 1 y PILL w•omo POI oRcur NLL Rr•es• eI Dwart M A 7' r•ll I all'- N ^ CI J ` g 6•.n•eCNl0 C.C.COL. V I [ I 4 .. ! cD Ill r000re/WruvKRT, 1 Illfl • � e't•'r•OUISD C.C.CAL. A 1 } • I •f -VJ"1 b 4 7 —♦ of r•oeo rou•rw•e+e KM. I _ L- `T ♦J I N j . w.11110•r OK ♦ I ' III HUI �—*. , ' \ • iI L1 Hlll • D•.n•rOU•!D ccwc.CAL. r.f. r,f• L ! Date 07/04/09 Cp ® n000 roll.,C YS KRT. ••.._....__...L.'---'.................. wn rue•10.MC By CML ..r /\ P.o .•.e• / �.r I'.e. I'M r.P /r r/ .J I / / / •e 116 / gi\60 T 0 tl• / si' ey WV' ^ 1 �14 "" i A3 . 1 k I9T FLR• COL. d FOUNDATION.PLAN 8 FMB .C4L V.•.1'.a d I li 1 le tt-.. -n u,7Fs..t] riq�l nnmwr Y I -ram:,-a a l nnnnn_ 1 g g g g' ♦♦♦♦�♦t♦♦♦♦♦a►♦♦�►♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ l®.er.v IN.Arr./ a I ♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ • GUEST RtnaOq1t • W c"•„t� •e'•, '.yt •4,11m-:,♦♦• 444g ♦♦♦-*,.S i A•-o• A ' T IIIfit, iaaAn. ecoAi•.v "e'A11 � ♦ ♦ ♦.♦♦� "e/ � 1 L T _,.1.� __ _ II I � �II IWYIIYYam:.nI -f`I�_ %,1� + JCLI OM '1UA. •1• '-.J' ;eJ j '^ �` rQ1'.;e r Cyt1 r_t• .r l-T-l„� 4 �'D—FIIC �1 • tlL t (QGUVT1'. ��. lid .11 _ __ I _.jL miller. __.. cool It ea wan r/ WTI YYIYA I__ 111111111t+i$;•— r . 1 Q 1MryI y opili,alli = ,a . 1 ! W Le 1 e' l i = O i L L aC� 6 a0o�� T 11. toms sr'a Aria 'I i i I�gi4 r 1- 1-•y v .9� _ m a —I I .'a e'.r• ....� '•� ] � ll r _` 8 ; — CC �dJ...1l1 ! 1] JI l .� C..I� l r' ' _ mnAJ ClI�" - .i \ I i'll -1�11 C 1 a ii�_ I �4fti]u-vi + 1 1 . i�ttt� a q - L p uP ����r.J�• , I �1 A IIIIII II - q 1.1 ink a 41,411\ILT. e�'I Lar 1 ,Y..:— !!!r at _ I k, I _ •�L,y11 rust !' "voi d-�I ll, =�. h -�"r- I _uo a. - -- 1 1�11t�� , i % Atli I 11/ gy1 i J < ; f ,.® >,+� UYQIO cR,0.6 • I I TO Y .i o'Y e' a' •.,•o r`. .er 1 A E �P" v" � O : L ,_,...I, .......-.47I_ 11 RR.Il lggi '®t:L I %I = A/C AREA 707A19 II �e V 1/ L '�ei • {yt'�J6i - ,L034,DETAILED.UVA CALCULATION Palt I ■ .•-.• -e• _ ,•• fill I 1 �II!I.I:I T oRaItBU ARG cA1.CvunaN i ^ �- I _ tone _ v.l,_. ,cso, wr i J f•:.. 1 I •• I,2rw�—� ,6I:.I,Ir IIRI — — — — HItli '. f-e• I 1_er___=..-- ., . Date DL04 3_'• 1........._..................al •'•,' � e• � e' ,Je" �' e._'. e•e' Y•t' t••_o• o_e•- yp� �J i s'-lo' I W..poon AND ruxc. 4::g\D DOORS TO lag mAcr ola.u, 1 A A FIRST FLOOF—_W 14 ' A-e.oVW 1..47. g PAW • irtili $I 1 1 1 1 1.. ; 1 il e ' V ye'-e• r •.1 I i k cm.(ele'r. =� ,Ix 11110 mom IIIII I III 1 g r°•se•o•ra•o•aero• nna•n• rr.:•: r11 (®.m.• len.1st.a Im M,.cl�� I.�...•.. .-, WN �'tRi Q =�..�. fir..l.A-. (L 114milli II b xut snot 1 F-1.121,T-9.1M room)k:::r,xnnn �/ W 111 1 € �� It °"el .e'o4to.io• Lott or Root e unworn mum r.dlnpn "IIIIIIIIril y' 1 e'4IJ. R t F.IC a. o t11,�►• n U Q © I fi►7 e m a�_t. '_t. 1 IL 06, I R . 1ere. u..o `i—N-�! 1 -1 r AS PO 17 10• 1r�IlW� mnRL„rianm , T b I 9 p��C�f��i �� a 'I a C�II�. ��w�*� (/ n�'l�rlww�l: an. .211 — ! ,-� r cn F Iur I�� ����k•R� to �� �'°. .t % {L.�e�, II _+ d_ b F9Q lek i .�A����:►.;P�- ern+ e � I en4R vatIftetrY1.11 — — 1 !r�T lvY re•e•r.r.r.l a I W 14 1 mr [nn inml i - 1° ,,..71. '''' 1 1 gel,'" ido ai.c. I Z O i pi �neoo r0e!tem,iw`rMunme 1 Q //\� 50 h 1 ' "... iIIiII a • I ---- p [['ate--c,t(now mum !f enn ' p J L [del% cwt. gee ¢a'• P I p \ 1 A 1 1 r11 u ue a,Yn.reeteo luD. , .,•I i MCI; 7u rot aii.e L.— — J : Data 07iO4i09 • er-e. e'-6' 11'.e• 6'-to• °'-e• e'-e' °'-a• By CM e-a• r is'-lo• ! t-a' e-e' e-4' lavo ° A4 2 1 A GECONP FLOOR PLAN °.e,° SC IMP 1 nw • I - sYcoTtl YURYN I V ,/ -. WOOD can a/ J p� 7 �'�/1 . ].!trill' Y tlp 111 RZ/p40 ncal epa• '/' "�'% ti 1. t 4 boozier-I,1ti.4 A l ii p1'� t'iIiit A�;-} a e1DOM laCZUM 1� '��•!iA1K"►�larrr�•� ���1�1�1 �i __, 1 } }- I� 11hr'4 111�1�166!�ia1!�1i1 e�,^ �I ll�l��.tell 1L v} 6 mr er m. m_ I g_di_-....�'- ..1l�IC -ir- �i IN I tl I �Q Ou,OfY cHllciE? .I = [ _ ' ' !p u.u�w.m+OOYa,TYP. ;• 3 i { F ►,I I1 a DW. ELEVATION DTL. am �' t• ;i �` ` 1e'�I�a'" �^^..aa��. j° {{ 2 a® • ' 11. •; :--r1' •- • ... . 4llllll 1haalla• .:— . e d E! e 1 I. • �1M�,�,�11 r�� .111 OSCCRATfle MAL � C) 1• r . • >91 IA - _ 1�1�1_�1 1 hmr cr aup a ENNIa .pp, 1■ f A •• a • Y to'-p'11J. t v 1114 . 1Cti( )GATEDTL 1/z^=1'-0" ❑11 Ii' . UUUuuUun, v I ;1 i Q I t I W - xoNC6 mrntQp ■Y �rpeWT poop Scat rpI= —...— I O x ef1:CCO wu+GW COLUMN AND WOOD DOOR -=VII, IND, STUCCO pAW COLUMN LLUIp1,WINDOWS AI ° nnv ,a+ee v 1 U WIND PRESSURE OPENING p aue. °FRONT ELEVATION (North) j QC ,• npr a.e © SCALE 1/4'=1'-0' p-SS,Spef.,r ir t9B.9pet. j Q I-' ,e. CU..TYI, 0- 05.0peL, +67.2paf. t ©-29.4par., +34,0par. j I '-1 u 1 3 Z I DW. DTL. n 'rY a H 1 r croup 1 fT . W y ¢ 1W� a �rJ.p � W imiirA VL QdI �l # - �wra�rnp......._,.......-`- ..IIf 4T '''. ' .-.. '..,:. . ': '. : ' ..Y..::::,...!."'.;::,;:,...;:.1 .:;.,:.,..:',',,.:'>.:,.:.'.,..,:'... ,•.:7.., ;.::i::,,".*::,..:,::..i''1,','•::',,'-.:.,.'',..:.:c Y..•,,-J:`'. i _tr.. i MB 1 d. ' LUSTER DTL, A 2 2"=1'-0" —-—-— —- - •"`� '` _ - na" 1 • Data 02,04,08 t By i '-_. -------- O SIDE ELEVATION (West) - SCALE I/4-.1.-0' a A 5 . 1': . : es. ___....- .......... • •-a , ---,4:!:-..:,-. -/, ,'. I . ':. . ''..;-:- 1 ,---:. ' ' i i it '• r.,,,,..,.._ . _• suenos , . ,.. . .._ • - --:,• 9814 e — '‘, 1, . . ..- 9814 :i2.-' , . _ . 1,-,- . ,--ii, ,..7;., ti,:i.: side front ,..,.-.0. i---- ;;IP.:'--` 1 ''. '1. '.. i.i' ', ' _ ; -,' ' :f --.— n-----.' ..•',.•,,,,_;:., ., 2,..t...:::L;;17:i.4.1._,,,,,„...„5,1,,,..•;c_.:,:i.*1.,f, I. . : A, t:._ , 1 i _ r RA i Ckli I 3°. 111 I 1111 ,,....v.k...4".. PM .,._ i 1 i I if b. • 4 0 -410-4‘.14 1-1'-%„:..,,,,,, ri'''-- 'i''•''''.; °••,,,,:.;':-__,..1;;,f..A gr;:.Z..--If)F"':'•'.7 ',F.„. /1 I. 4, ."-;.P'„ '1.-4.•'''' '''," • ;I ,E.,..$-.,— . . . . 1 `7.-'... ''''11.e.-.:.-----..1 3,4..0 1 •.!-! 4.1 • .., -.....%.1.. • ,• _, rt __ 1, 'A , q.,.• , illir • .74 . 0 ' 15---ii 11------10.---,1 1 :A , 4 x 60 Watt Incandescent Candelabra r Damp Location•Seeded Acrylic Diffuser 1 --1.... s__ • ' .II i 1 ,,_ • . ,....-0-„,;,, . , . --; •••Lib, ....."Y _. . (see page 55 for optional finishes,• lamping and diffusers) . :• I., IQ r__ 9u.1.5) -- ------- . . _i ••••• - \ . . -a. .,... .... 1 ( 1 '''•'- • -ai • aside front - --.-- „... ......., 4-•---j-..... ••••• I r 'A 1001300BI la n0000l Y II .--.--i--.'.,.: , - 18 5' i 1 ...L. • - i+ -,• 111.4,; ii) 4 ••••,..--- •-.; . .,.14, .",-,-.........-:.• ,. I ve... .4.,:r ..,-.- •- '',,v.-1,, .'3!...;,:=;:r.-. ,.. .14 •4 -, -ft"'La..a.:,.....!.k•,;;,:i -1k1 Q . ZA p7 . 1.---7.25—Pi 1—S.----41 •A.81 4...... ,,.......,, •' ••••• ' .f_ ;1-11:\ - 1 a 60 Watt Incandescent Candelabra :T • -k i__ - 1 '1.10:::::i.,,, Damp Location•Seeded Acrylic Diffuser _ -s: ., I --- = ,• C.) ' . • -; -' k- ,,,,.,-, • ,.-• I 41W'M I 7:1-1ZINLIGIHrTS lighting with the htirnah imoictin-seint I - 39 i'ilif 'II - 11111_ a 3L Finish A 1 ns _ Stands rd Finish Options BLK-Low Lustre slack CM-Copper Marble FB-Faux Burl Yx 'X it6 f - t € { S - x — - f t ' ,� r to 1 - r s - z �` ci � t r MB-Medieval Bronze a MG Metalic Gray NB-New Brass tr c' t x i 3 It h t1 r C• .� •c ' - - -%,,,,,":1-.' ---,,0 iiiiionsimu SP-Satin Pewter VGVerdigris Copper 109 North Dixie Boulevard Delray Beach, Florida 33444 April 3,2005 Warren Adams,M.R.I.C.S. Historic Preservation Planner City of Delray Beach 100 N.W. 1g Avenue Delray Beach, Florida 33444 Dear Warren, Thank you for taking the time to meet with and update my neighbor and me regarding the proposed property development at and surrounding 118 Dixie Boulevard in Delray Beach. It is my understanding that the developers/builders,who are not to my knowledge residents of this area, intend to construct two massive houses and a large addition to the existing historic house. I am deeply concerned that the substantial mass and scale of this proposed project are inappropriate not only in the historic neighborhood of Del Ida Park, but especially on this boulevard, which currently consists primarily of small- to moderately-sized cottages and bungalows. Such a massive building scale here will disrupt, if not destroy,the architectural integrity and sense of community which we currently experience. Yet I am pu771ed —the developers/builders are enthusiasticly marketing "Historic Del Ida Park" while simultaneously proposing to undermine, its historic character by inserting "McMansions" into the neighborhood. If such a precedent is allowed to be established in Del Ida Park, then over time the very historic quality of this neighborhood, or any such neighborhood, in other words its intrinsic historic value,will be lost. I am requesting that the mass, scale and square footage of the intended structures be significantly reduced so as to conform more successfully to the existing structures on this street. Indeed, my house, built in 1937, is a mere 930 sq. ft. — a fraction of the 3000-4000 sq. ft. dwellings which the developers/builders propose; my house will face these monolithic structures directly across the street. The Beach Property Owners' Association recently resolved the "McMansionization" proliferating in their neighborhood by successfully petitioning City Hall to allow only incremental new building size increases in their neighborhood, based on the square footage of adjacent or nearby properties. Could you, with the Planning and Zoning Board and the Historic Preservation Board, examine this as a possible solution for Del Ida Park? Could you also request that these boards and the City Commission require a visual impact study and scaled elevation drawings of any proposed building and the adjacent buildings on either sid, before consideration of any new project, especially one such as this which will so radically and profoundly affect and alter the streetscape, will be made? I respectfully request that any decision on this matter be postponed to allow for further study. Sincerely, Sarah B. Greeley 2 Dixie Blvd. Delray Beach, FL 33444 April 4, 2005 Mr. Warren Adams Historic Preservation Planner 100 N.W. 1s1 Avenue Delray Beach, FL 33444 Dear Warren: Many thanks for the time you spent with me and my neighbor, Sarah Greeley,to discuss the new construction at 118 Dixie Blvd. in the Del Ida Park Historic District. The plans you have for Lot 3 are a real concern to me. The two story design with over 3000 square feet look overwhelming and would certainly look massive and out of place among our small cottages. There are plans for two more of these monster houses plus an addition to the present house on this property. This is a designated historic district within the City of Delray Beach which should mean the preservation of the style and character of old Defray. Therefore,I would like to register my protest against these plans and request the City Commissioners and Building and Zoning require these investor/builders to go back to the drawing board. Sincerely yours, Barbara Drowne _ HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD •CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: April 20, 2005 • AGENDA ITEM: lll.D. ITEM: House of Vintage, 123 South Swinton Avenue. Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness and associated Class V site plan, landscape plan, design elements, and a waiver request for a residential extension to a commercial property. I I---It----I iL i uu uu L- kW. 3RD ST. N.E. 3RD St a _ CITY W ATTORNEY __ — ap BUILDING -E= _ GENERAL DATA: f N.W.2ND ST. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DRIVE >N.E. 2ND ST. Z Q-- Owner Michelle Parparian - Applicant Jeffrey Silberstein - HATLL _ Agent Jeffrey Silberstein 3 _ Location City Commission Chambers _ z — Property Size 0.15 Acres - — Future Land Use OMU (Other Mixed Use) _ N.W. 1ST ST. N.E_ 1ST ST. Map = 3 — =urrent Zoning OSSHAD (Old School = COMMUNITY= _ Square Historic Arts District) _= CENTER Adjacent Zoning North: OSSHAD = — East: OSSHAD — TENNIS OLD STADIUM I SCHOOL — South: OSSHAD SQUARE West: OSSHAD & CF (Community ATLANTIC A V E. Facilities) SOUTH ,E Existing Land Use Commercial COUNTYI Z ,r COURT a Proposed Land Use Residential addition to the existing . HOUSE commercial premises. z Water Service Existing on site. Sewer Service Existing on site. - I I.[ S.W. 1ST ST. S.E. 1ST ST. a n 3 _ ! 1 SW 2ND ST. SE 2ND 5T -N- _ • 1 4 TBA ,, ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The action before the Board is that of approval of a COA that incorporates the following aspects of the development proposal for 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage), pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.5(F): ❑ Class IV Site Plan Modification; ❑ Landscape Plan; ❑ Design Elements; and, ❑ Waiver Request The subject property is located on the east side of South Swinton Avenue, between SE 1st Street and SE 2'd Street. BACKGROUND / The subject property consists of Lot 3, Block 70 of the Sundy and Cromer Amended Plat. The 1,347 sq. ft. Masonry Vernacular structure was constructed in 1947 as a residence and displays a cross gable shingle roof and varying fenestration including metal casement, jalousie and awning windows. The building is designated historic and is considered a contributing building in the Old School Square Historic District. The property is zoned Old School Square Historic District (OSSHAD) and is used as a commercial premises. At its meeting of January 15, 2003, the HPB approved, with conditions, the conversion of the single family dwelling to office, the construction of a four (4) space asphalt parking lot to the rear (east) of the property and the creation of one parking space to the front (west), the installation of a handicapped accessible ramp, demolition of a 96 sq. ft. non-contributing wood frame shed, and the installation of landscaping. Approval was also given for waiver requests to allow parking in front of the historic building and a waiver to reduce the landscape strips on the north side from five feet (5') to four feet (4') and on the south side from five feet (5') to three and a half feet (3.5'). A variance request was also approved to allow a back-out parking space onto Swinton Avenue; provided that the space is • designated for employee parking and that signage is provided directing patrons to the rear parking area. During its meeting of September 17, 2003, the Board reviewed and approved a Class II Site Plan Modification for the conversion from office to retail.On September 22, 2003, the , applicant was cited by Delray Beach Code Enforcement for the removal of the original divided light, steel casement windows and the installation of 6/6 aluminum frame windows related to the elevation changes from the Class V Site Plan approval. The applicant was notified that the windows were inappropriate and that they must submit a COA for the installation of new divided light, casement windows. On January 7, 2004, HPB approval was granted, subject to conditions, for the installation of a free-standing sign, an under lanopy sign, casement windows, and storm panels. A Class IV Site Plan Modification has been submitted for the addition of a 3 story residential addition to the rear of the extant historic structure. Meeting Date:April 20, 2005 Agenda Item: III.D. 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage) Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The development proposal includes the following: ❑ Construction of a 1,882 sq. ft. 3 story residential addition to the rear of the building and demolition of the existing single-loaded four (4) space parking lot; o Construction of a four (4) space back-out parking lot on to the alley including one handicapped accessible space; and, o Installation of associated landscaping and relocation of the trash receptacles to the south side of the building. SITE PLAN ANALYSIS COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Items identified in the Land Development Regulations shall specifically be addressed by the body taking final action on the site and development application/request. Development Standards As indicated below, the proposal complies with the associated development standards of LDR Section 4.3.4(K) and 4.4.24(F) as they pertain to the OSSHAD zoning district: Required Provided Building Height (max.) 35' 34.71' (mean roof) 37.04' (parapet) Building Setbacks (min.) - Front 25' 29.65' Side Interior (north) 7.5' 7.95' Side Interior (south) 7.5' 7.5' Rear 10' 26' Open Space 25% 37.8% Section 4.4.24(F)(5) I<The floor area on the third floor shall be limited to 50% of the second floor area and the building setbacks or planes of the façade are offset and varied to provide visual relief. The second floor area is 690 square feet, and the third floor area 352 square feet which equals 51% of the second floor area. Also, the third floor has not been stepped back from the façade, therefore the proposal does not comply with this section of the LDRs. 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage) Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 3 Section 4.4.24 Old School Square Historic Arts District Parking Requirement: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(4)(a), all non-residential uses, with the exception of restaurants, shall provide one parking space per 300 square feet of total new floor area. This requirement may be reduced to one parking space per 400 square feet of total floor area, or by at least one space, where there is a mix of residential and non-residential use in the same structure. Additionally, pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(C)(2)(c), two or more k bedroom dwelling units shall provide two (2) parking spaces per unit plus 0.5 of a parking space per unit in guest parking. Based on the definition of bedroom, the loft counted as a bedroom. Calculating the commercial car parking using 1 space per 400 square feet [LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(4)(a)] and calculating the new residential car parking using 2 spaces for a 2 bedroom unit and 0.5 spaces for guests [LDR Section 4.6.9(C)(2)(c)] has resulted in only 1 extra space being required. The application of LDR Section 4.4.24(G)(6) has then allowed this space to be omitted from the design. Based on the above, the parking requirement has been met. LDR Chapter 4.6 Supplementary District Regulations: 4,Lighting Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.8, site lighting is required. Therefore, a condition of approval is that a photometric plan must be submitted which complies with the illumination standards of Section 4.6.8 of the LDRs. It is noted the light fixtures must be decorative. Provisions for Ingress and Egress: Pursuant to LDR Section 4.6.9(D)(2)(b), when the parking is next to an alley, the parking space and alley (paved) must have a combined minimum depth of 42'. The depth shown on the proposed architectural plans is approximately 32' while the engineering plan shows the depth at 40'. Therefore, a condition of approval is that the parking space and alley must have a combined minimum depth of 42' and that all plans are consistent with each other. It is further noted that the plans must indicate the improvements within the alley which include the paved alley and the 2' valley gutter. LDR Chapter 6.1 Design Standards and Requirements Undergrounding of Utilities: Pursuant to LDR Section 6.1.8, utility facilities servicing the development shall be located underground. A note to this effect must be indicated on the plans. 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage) Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 4 Technical Items: The following Technical Items must be addressed with the submittal of revised plans prior to building permit submittal: 1) Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.3(B)(7), the location of the nearest driveway or point of access of adjacent properties (including property across a street, which shares a common street with the subject property). If there are no driveways within 50', then they do not need to be shown; however, a note to this situation shall be provided. 2) Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.3(B)(17), the location of proposed lighting fixtures with a note pertaining to height and details of the proposed lighting must be submitted. 3) The architectural site plan (Sheet A-1.0) must indicate the existing and proposed improvements on the entire site. .4) Indicate on the plans the proposed use of the loft area. 5) Indicate on the plans the step down to access the first floor of the extension. 6) Indicate on the plans that all utility facilities servicing the development shall be located underground. 7) It is noted that the design of the addition could potentially allow it to be utilized separately from the commercial element of the building. As such, modifications to the floor plan may be necessary to eliminate this potential. 8) Indicate proposed site grades on the north side of the property. 9) Provide a typical cross section from the building to the adjacent right-of-way or adjacent property at all property lines. Pay particular attention to the grade differential from the proposed site to the existing adjacent properties and show the existing grades on the adjacent property. • 10)The site is required to retain a 5 year 1 hour storm (3.2") in addition to meeting water quality criteria (1"). Provide signed and sealed drainage calculations and indicate how storm water will be retained on site. 11)Indicate on the engineering plans how the roof drainage is accommodated. 12)Clearly delineate between the existing and proposed improvements. 13)The pavement indicated on the landscape plan does not match the pavement on the engineering plans. 14)Provide a note that water meter sizes are to be determined by the City of Delray Beach Utility Department upon building permit application and remove the size indicated on the engineering plans. 15)Provide proposed water meter locations. 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage) Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 5 16)Indicate the location of the existing sewer service. 17)Provide on the plans the current City of Delray Beach standard construction details as applicable. 18)Provide a Pollution Prevention Plan. Prior to and during construction of all sites, the permitee shall implement and maintain all erosion and sediment control measures included in the required Pollution Prevention Plan. For projects over one (1) acre in size, provide a copy of FDEP Notice of Intent. LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS irz Both existing and proposed landscaping will be interspersed throughout the property. The existing landscaping consists of a Banyan Tree and Royal Palm at the southwest corner of the property, a relocated Gumbo Limbo Tree at the southwest corner of the parking lot, a relocated Dahoon Holly Tree on the south property line adjacent to the addition, and 2 relocated Sabal Palms on the north property line adjacent to the proposed addition. Further landscaping consists of a Crape Myrtle Tree, Blue Ledwort, and Wax Jasmine at the northwest corner of the property, a. Pigmy Date Palm, Wax Jasmine, and Cocoplum adjacent to the front (west) façade of the existing building, Simpson Stoppers along the north and south property lines, and Sword Fern at the southwest corner of the property. In addition to the relocated materials, the proposed landscaping includes 3 Double Alexander Palms adjacent to the parking lot, Simpson Stoppers(along with a 4' CMU wall) to screen the roll-out carts, and a Cocoplum hedge between the parking area and the addition. The proposed landscaping complies with the requirements of LDR Section 4.6.16 with the exception of the width of the landscape strips along the north and south edges of the parking lot to 2.5' and 3.5' respectively. Section (3 a landscape strip of not less than 5' in width, excluding curbing, shall be located between the vehicular use area and abutting properties and that a minimum landscape barrier shall be a minimum of 24" in height at the time of planting along the perimeter landscape barrier that separates the vehicular use area from abutting properties. With the site plan approval on January 15, 2003, the approved landscape waiver was to reduce the landscape strips on the north side from five feet (5') to four feet (4') and on the A' south side from five feet (5') to three and a half feet (3.5'). A waiver has been further requested to reduce the north landscape barrier from 4' to 2.5'. Required Findings: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B)(5), prior to granting a waiver, the granting body shall make findings that the granting of the waiver: a)Shall not adversely affect the neighboring area; b)Shall not significantly diminish the provision of public facilities; c) Shall not create an unsafe situation; and, • 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage) Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 6 d) Does not result in the grant of a special privilege in that the same waiver would be granted under similar circumstances on other property for another applicant or owner. Given the site constraints, the waiver is necessary to accommodate the width of the rear parking area. In order to meet the parking requirement, the proposal must include the 4 parking spaces to the rear of the property and the 6" curbing. As up to 30% of the required parking may be used for compact cars, 1 compact space has been included to reduce the width of the surfaced area. There does not appear to be any other method by which the applicant can reduce the width of the parking area further. ('Given the analysis above, the waiver request will neither adversely affect the neighboring area nor grant a special privilege to the property owner. No public facilities will be at risk %. and no unsafe situations shall be formed by the granting of this waiver. Also, similar waivers have been granted under similar circumstances. , positive findings can be made to grant the requested waiver pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.7(B). DESIGN ELEMENTS/ANALYSIS Proposed Addition The extant historic building is a one story masonry vernacular building with a cross gable shingle roof. The windows have varying light patterns including single pane and divided light designs with all windows having a vertical emphasis. The building is light green in color. / The proposed rear addition consists of a 3 story dwelling in which the owner of the extant / historic building intends to live. The extension will be of a contemporary design and will be constructed of concrete block and stucco with a flat roof surrounded by a parapet. The majority of the windows are 9' high with the east elevation of the second floor and the south elevation of the third floor being almost entirely of glass. There are also two smaller windows on the first and second floors which are long and narrow with a horizontal emphasis. The front facing (west) façade contains no windows. The materials legend describes the windows and doors as being of clear glass with white frames; however, no mention is made of their material. Window and door specifications must therefore be submitted. There is a concrete balcony with a stainless steel cable rail to the south and east elevations of the second floor. The balcony extends 3' from the south elevation, and 8' from the east elevation. The proposed extension will be attached to the extant historic building by a one story entrance vestibule constructed of concrete block and stucco with a sloping standing seam mill finish galvalume roof. The addition is to be painted `Regale Blue' 'n color. The first floor of the extension has an area of 840 square feet (including the vestibule) and contains a bedroom and bathroom. The second floor measures 690 square feet and comprises a living room and kitchen, and the third floor contains a loft of 352 square feet with access to a roof terrace of 338 square feet. The site data table states that the dwelling will contain two bedrooms; however, the plans show a bedroom and a loft which is to be used as an office. The proposed use of the loft area should be clarified on the drawings. 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage) Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 7 LDR Section 2.4.6(H) — Certificate of Appropriateness: Pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(H)(5), the Board must make a finding that any Certificate of Appropriateness which is to be approved is consistent with Historic Preservation purposes pursuant to Objective A-4 of the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and specifically with the provisions of LDR Section 4.5.1. Future Land Use Element Objective A-4: The redevelopment of land and buildings shall provide for the preservation of historic resources. The objective shall be met through continued adherence to the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance and the following policies: Future Land Use Element Policy A-4.1: Prior to approval or recommending approval of any land use or development application for property located within a historic district or designated as a historic site, the Historic Preservation Board must make a finding that the requested action is consistent with the provisions of Section 4.5.1 of the Land Development Regulations relating to historic sites and districts and the "Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines". LDR Section 4.5.1(E)-Design Elements Pursuant to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and 4.5.1(E)(8)(a), (c), (g), (h), and (j), "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating alterations or additions of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: (4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (8) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: (a) Height: The height of proposed buildings or modifications shall be visually compatible in comparison or relation to the height of existing structures and buildings. (c)Proportion of Openings (Windows and Doors): The openings of any buildings within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the openings exemplified by the prevailing historic architectural styles within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors among buildings within the district shall be visually compatible. (g) Relationship of Materials, Texture, and Color: The relationship of materials, texture, and color of the façade of a building shall be visually compatible with the predominant materials used in the historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage) Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 8 (h) Roof Shapes: The roof shape of a building or structure shall be visually compatible with the roof shape of a historic site, building or structure within a historic district. (j) Scale of a Building: The size of a building, the building mass in relation to open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, and porches shall be visually compatible with the building size and building mass of historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation states that: New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. Design Guidelines Locate an addition as inconspicuously as possible, usually to the rear or least public side of a building. In a historic district, consider the surrounding buildings and the compatibility of the addition in terms of size, scale, materials, mass and roof form. Do not introduce a new architectural style, or too closely mimic the style of the existing building. Additions should be simply and cleanly designed and NOT attempt to replicate the original design. insure that the addition is secondary and subordinate to the main mass of the historic building. Additions that overwhelm the original building are not an acceptable solution. Analysis 2j(The proposal is for a residential addition to the one story extant historic building which currently has a commercial use. The proposed addition is to the rear of the extant building Iand, if it was to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic \property could be reinstated with minor repair and reinstatement. However, the existing building is a single story Masonry Vernacular structure while the proposed addition is a 3 story structure of a contemporary design. Although the proposed extension illustrates a clear distinction between what is old and what is new, it is incompatible with the extant historic structure and the other buildings in this section of South Swinton Avenue which comprises mainly single story Vernacular/Traditional structures. The Design Guidelines state that, when extending a historic building, a new 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage) Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 9 karchitectural style should not be introduced, and that consideration should be given to the form of the surrounding buildings. The third floor of the proposed extension will result in the extension being approximately 16.4' higher than the roof ridge of the historic building. This is almost twice the height of the *y. existing building and, it will, therefore, be visible from the public right-of-way (South Swinton Avenue). This is in contravention of the Design Guidelines which state that an extension should be located as inconspicuously as possible, and to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(a), which states that the height of proposed buildings or modifications shall be visually compatible in comparison or relation to the height of the existing structures and buildings. The proposed windows for the extension are of two differing designs, neither of which is compatible with the historic structure. Those that are 9' in height are much larger than those generally found in the historic district and result in large expanses of glass on the extension, e rimfl vertical emphasis of thoseandthe on others the originalhava building.hozontal Pursuantephasis to which LDR Sectioncon icts 4 with.5.1(E)(8)(thec), the openings of any buildings within a historic district shall be visually compatible with the openings exemplified by the prevailing historic architectural styles within the district. The relationship of the width of windows and doors among buildings within the district shall be visually compatible. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(h), the roof shape of a building or structure shall be visually compatible with the roof shape of a historic site, building or structure within a historic district. The extant historic building has a cross gable pitched roof while the proposed extension has a flat roof surrounded by a parapet. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(j), the size of a building, the building mass in relation to open spaces, windows, door openings, balconies, and porches shall be visually compatible with the building size and building mass of historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. The front of the extant historic building faces west and contains a number of windows, a door, and a porch. The west façade of the proposed extension that can be seen rising above the historic structure; however, contains no windows or features and is therefore a flat, blank wall. The massing of the proposed extension is therefore incompatible with the historic building and district. The applicant has stated that painting the extension a muted blue color will help to blend the extension in with the sky; however, the proposed height and mass of the extension will still overwhelm the historic building. Also, there is no guarantee that the extension will always be painted a muted blue color and it is unlikely a condition such as this could be imposed on the building's owner. Pursuant to LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g), the relationship of the materials, texture, and color of the façade of a building shall be visually compatible with the predominant materials used in the historic sites, buildings, and structures within a historic district. On the completion of any addition, the addition should be painted a similar color to the extant historic building, which, in this case, is a pale green. Any extension to a historic building should be sensitive to the style, character, massing and form of the historic structure while not attempting to replicate the original design. This can be achieved in a number of subtle ways which may not be instantly apparent but become obvious as one looks more closely at individual details and elements. For example, if the • 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage) Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 10 'windows on the historic building have a 6 over 6 light configuration, the windows on the ski.( extension can be the same style and size but have a 4 over 4 light configuration. If the historic building has lap siding, the extension could incorporate lap siding of a different width or profile. If the historic building has ornate detail, the extension can be designed with a plainer appearance. If the historic building has decorative shutters, the extension could have windows with impact resistant glass and no shutters. To make it obvious that part of a building is an extension to a historic structure, a date stone or plaque can be inserted in one of the external walls. As a guide, it is suggested that the proposed addition be of concrete block and stucco construction, have a pitched roof and be 2 stories in height. To distinguish the extension _ from the original building, the stucco could be of a different texture, the roof overhang or. pitch could be altered, or decorative elements such as shutters or a simple motif at the window heads could be incorporated. The windows should have similar dimensions to those on the historic building but could have a different light configuration or opening mechanism. If additional space is required, part of the second story could extend beyond the first floor (in place of the proposed balcony) and this may also allow a more traditional floor plan to be achieved with the living room and kitchen being on the first floor and the bedroom, office and bathroom being on the second floor. Modern designs can be successfully incorporated into historic areas and, if the proposed extension was a stand-alone building, its design could blend in well with some of the Art Moderne buildings in the Marina Historic District. However, it is inappropriate as an addition to a Masonry Vernacular building situated on this section of_Soutt�Swintan AvenuefBased ert-the-above;-pesitive-fii i ings cannot be made with respect to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, and LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8). REQUIRED FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, written materials submitted by the applicant, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body, which has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to consistency with the Future Land Use Map, Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency, and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations. Section 3.1.1(A) - Future Land Use Map: The subject property has a Future Land Use Map designation of Other Mixed Use (OMU) and a zoning designation of Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD). The OSSHAD zoning district is consistent with the OMU Future Land Use Map designation. Within the OSSHAD district, pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(B)(4), retrial sales through specialty shops are a permitted use. Also, pursuant to LDR Section 4.4.24(C)(2), on a parcel that has its principal use a non-residential use, there may be no more than two residential units, either within a separate structure or within a structure housing a non- 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage) Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 11 residential use. Based upon the above, it is appropriate to make a positive finding with respect to LDR Section 3.1.1(A), Future Land Use Map Consistency. Section 3.1.1(B) - Concurrency: As described in Appendix A, a positive finding of concurrency can be made as it relates to water, sewer, streets and traffic, drainage, parks and recreation, open space, solid waste, and schools. Section 3.1.1 (C) - Consistency (Standards for Site Plan Actions): As described in Appendix B, a positive finding of consistency can be made as it relates to Standards for Site Plan Actions. Section 3.1.1 (D) - Compliance With the Land Development Regulations: As described under the Site Plan Analysis of this report, a positive finding of compliance with the LDRs can be made, provided the conditions of approval are addressed. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES: A review of the objectives and policies of the adopted Comprehensive Plan was conducted and the following applicable objectives or policies are noted: Future Land Use Element Objective A-1: Property shall be developed or redeveloped in a manner so that the future use and intensity is appropriate and complies in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations, is complimentary to adjacent land uses, and fulfills remaining land use needs. The subject property contains a 1,347 square foot former single-family dwelling which now has a commercial use. It was constructed in 1947 in the Masonry Vernacular style and is a contributing building within the OSSHAD. The development proposal is for the construction of a 2% story, 1,882 square foot addition to the rear and alterations to the existing car park and landscaping. The subject property contains no special physical or environmental characteristics that would be negatively impacted by the proposed development. Zoning Designation: Use: North: OSSHAD Private Residence South: OSSHAD Private Residence East: OSSHAD Private Residence West: OSSHAD and CF (Community Facilities) St. Paul's Church/Commercial As noted in the above table, the abutting properties are all consistent with the subject property with regard to zoning designation and are generally compatible with regard to use. Based upon the above, no compatibility issues will exist between the proposed mixed-use development (commercial/residential) and the surrounding land uses, and positive findings can be made with regard to Future Land Use Element Objective A-1. However, as 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage) Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 12 previously discussed in further detail under the Design Elements Analysis and as noted below with regard to LDR Section 2.4.5(F) (5), the development proposal is incompatible with the surrounding properties with respect to height, scale, massing and design. Housing Element Policy A-12.3: In evaluating proposals for new development or redevelopment, the City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. As discussed previously, the subject property is compatible with the adjacent properties with regard to use. Further, the development proposal will not have a negative impact on the surrounding area with regard to the criteria stated above (noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns). However, there are concerns as to the design of the proposed extension and its incompatibility with the surrounding historic structures which may result in a degradation of the neighborhood. These concerns are discussed in further detail below. LDR Section 2.4.5(F)(5) - Compatibility (Site Plan Findings): The approving body must make a finding that development of the property pursuant to the site plan will be compatible and harmonious with adjacent and nearby properties and the City as a whole, so as not to cause substantial depreciation of property values. The subject property exists within the OSSHAD zoning district and is bounded by a combination of commercial, church, and residential uses. Compatibility with uses is not a concern, as the proposed mixed-use development would be permitted on the surrounding properties. However, the adjacent properties along North Swinton Avenue are primarily one-story TraditionalNernacular structures. The proposed extension is a 3 story structure built to a contemporary design which does not respect the majority of the requirements of the LDRs and the Design Guidelines with respect to new construction in historic areas. Based upon the above, the proposed addition will be neither compatible nor harmonious with adjacent and nearby properties; therefore positive findings can not be made with regard to LDR Section 2.4.5(F)(5). REVIEW BY OTHERS Community Redevelopment Agency <The project proposed for the House of Vintage was reviewed by the CRA during its meeting on March 10, 2005. The Board recommended denial by a vote of 6-0, based on the building addition's incompatibility with the existing structure. ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION The development proposal involves the addition of a 1,882 square foot residential unit to a contributing historic building currently in a commercial use.the proposed waiver to reduce 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage) Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 13 the perimeter landscape strip at the north end of the parking lot can be supported in order to accommodate the width of the parking spaces. With respect to the design of the proposed addition, however, the applicant is attempting to introduce a new architectural style to the extant historic building and this section of the OSSHAD. The proposed extension fails to comply with the majority of the design requirements set out in the LDRs and the Design Guidelines and therefore is not consistent with Section 3.1.1 and Section 2.4.5(F)(5) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. As the recommendation to provide a two-story structure will most likely impact the site design somewhat, the item should be postponed with direction. ALTERNATIVE'ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness and the associated waiver, Class IV site modification plan, landscape plan and design elements for 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage), by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following conditions: 1) That the third floor area is limited to 50% of the second floor area. 2) That the third floor setbacks or planes of the façade are offset and varied to provide visual relief. 3) That a photometric plan is submitted which complies with the illumination standards of Section 4.6.8 of the LDRs. It is noted the light fixtures must be decorative. 4) That the parking space and alley have a combined minimum depth of 42'. 5) That all plans are consistent with each other. 6) That the plans indicate the improvements within the alley which include the paved alley and the 2' valley gutter 7) That revised plans are submitted addressing the Site and Engineering Plan Technical Items as indicated in the staff report, and the listed conditions. 8) That window and door specifications are submitted. 9) The proposed use of the loft area is clarified on the drawings. 10) That the applicant ensures that the palm to be planted adjacent to the east building elevation will not be in conflict with the overhang of the building. 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage) . Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 14 11) That the design of the building elevations are altered to provide visual compatibility with the historic buildings within the historic district. C. Move denial of the Certificate of Appropriateness and the associated Class IV site plan, landscape plan and design elements for 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage), by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet the criteria set forth in the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Historic Preservation Design Guidelines, and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. =; ;- STAFF RECOMMENDATION , .,.__ Postpone with direction. Attachments: Survey, Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Elevations, Floor Plan Staff Report Prepared by: Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage) Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 15 APPENDIX:" A CONCURRENCY FINDINGS Pursuant to Section 3.1.1(B) Concurrency as defined pursuant to Objective B-2 of the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan must be met and a determination made that the public facility needs of the requested land use and/or development application will not exceed the ability of the City to fund and provide, or to require the provision of, needed capital improvements for the following areas: Water and Sewer: 0 Water service exists via a service lateral connection to the 10" water main along South Swinton Avenue. ❑ Sewer service exists via a service lateral connection to a 8" sewer main within the adjacent north/south alley. Pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan, treatment capacity is available at the City's Water Treatment Plant and the South Central County Waste Water Treatment Plant for the City at build- out. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to this level of service standards. Drainage: A drainage plan has been submitted indicating that drainage is retained on-site via an exfiltration system. The proposal includes relocating a catch basin to accommodate the addition. No problems are anticipated. Streets and Traffic: The subject property is located in the City's TCEA (Traffic Concurrency Exception Area), which encompasses the CBD, CBD-RC, OSSHAD, and West Atlantic Avenue Business Corridor. The TCEA exempts the above-described areas from complying with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. The proposed addition will generate an additional 7 trips per day on to the surrounding roadway network. . Schools: As the subject property is located in the City's TCEA, this project is exempt from meeting School Concurrency requirements. Parks and Recreation Facilities: The proposed residential unit will not have a significant impact with respect to level of service standards for parks and recreation facilities. Pursuant to LDR Section 5.3.2, a park impact fee of $500.00 per dwelling unit will be collected prior to issuance of a building permit for parks and recreation purposes. Solid Waste: At the highest waste generation rates, trash generated by the existing 1,347 sq.ft. office building is [1,347 sq.ft. x 5.4 lbs/sq.ft. = 7,273.8 lbs/2,000 = 3.6369 or 3.64 tons] 3.64 tons of solid waste per year. The proposed two-bedroom apartment will generate 1.99 tons of solid waste per year, thus the development proposal will generate a total of 5.63 tons per year. The Solid Waste Authority has indicated that its facilities have sufficient capacity to handle all development proposals till the year 2021. 123 South Swinton Avenue(House of Vintage) Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 16 APPENDIX B ,: STANDARDS FOR SITE ,PLAN ACTIONS A. Building design, landscaping, and lighting (glare) shall be such that they do not create unwarranted distractions or blockage of visibility as it pertains to traffic circulation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent Will meet this standard once a photometric plan is submitted which complies with LDR Section 4.6.8. B. Separation of different forms of transportation shall be encouraged. This includes pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles in a manner consistent with policies found under Objectives D-1 and D-2 of the Transportation Element. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent C. Open space enhancements as described in Policies found under Objective B-1 of the Open Space and Recreation Element are appropriately addressed. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent D. The City shall evaluate the effect that any street widening or traffic circulation modification may have upon an existing neighborhood. If it is determined that the widening or modification will be detrimental and result in a degradation of the neighborhood, the project shall not be permitted. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent E. Development of vacant land which is zoned for residential purposes shall be planned in a manner which is consistent with adjacent development regardless of zoning designations. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent F. Property shall be developed or redeveloped in a manner so that the future use and intensity are appropriate in terms of soil, topographic, and other applicable physical considerations; complementary to adjacent land uses; and fulfills remaining land use needs. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent 123 South Swinton Avenue (House of Vintage) Class IV Site Plan Modification, Landscape Plan, and Design Elements Page 17 G. Redevelopment and the development of new land shall result in the provision of a variety of housing types which shall continue to accommodate the diverse makeup of the City's demographic profile, and meet the housing needs identified in the Housing Element. This shall be accomplished through the implementation of policies under Objective B-2 of the Housing Element. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent H. The City shall consider the effect that the proposal will have on the stability of nearby neighborhoods. Factors such as noise, odors, dust, traffic volumes and circulation patterns shall be reviewed in terms of their potential to negatively impact the safety, habitability and stability of residential areas. If it is determined that a proposed development will result in a degradation of any neighborhood, the project shall be modified accordingly or denied. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent I. Development shall not be approved if traffic associated with such development would create a new high accident location, or exacerbate an existing situation causing it to become a high accident location,without such development taking actions to remedy the accident situation. Not applicable Meets intent of standard X Does not meet intent J. Tot lots and recreational areas, serving children from toddler to teens, shall be a feature of all new housing developments as part of the design to accommodate households having a range of ages. This requirement may be waived or modified for residential developments located in the downtown area, and for infill projects having fewer than 25 units. Not applicable X Meets intent of standard Does not meet intent • D CALCULATED EEASURENEI I I I i1L •�u.,�I v, ' Lei it ! .•.� ,, ,4TLSa1 II',I . D.E. -DENOTES DRAINAG F --_ ' •T'N'c �I U E -DENOTES UTILITY • I' '° - ' ^'_. IR/C - DENOTES IRON ROD WITH CAP 'i I I I', '1,)' I". '. i Itv•.v I I i i!u*IY I.R. - DENOTES IRON ROD(NO CAP) ^j I ,.1 f' �•.I .. I_ ; I 9 q - DENOTES CENTER UNE • .. � � ' y� LOT 2 • —� i " ; I II � � IL V S .[ ,, 1. • �aVNO 7„ik'Gi✓fOIJ �NOCPPf 27:11hE� E'��"� �r7 1� i : i1 • • :' 1 33.00' y pan 7 • b J )o) o ,u�' �J� ,1y'nr��:r'_ats..•:vF�107 +c..rl ."•se -T.,�� 1 l� e r f/CFi. r �� >Nr . �'ti ,X.50.o'I ! I r, ma's, 311�WIN ®11111111.0 � ,! e•s' v �J 4 9r. 1D .�nl P lit.,.. ::,,-;; I'h Lill 17••1{' ' I 'IS.L:.l':I',(.MI^d f ."' -711 N o`o m "s✓ a-e J o p • , LOCATION MAP •�I :,I N w; rraa o •'.r .°iv, • ` (NOT TO SCALE) i�t e FOR THE BENEFIT OF; �I • Q "�� G�� TIJCi� C15. �,/z03 pa�ee,N4 z.or N re64; '", n O 5aoo ee.e a,z' /23 ' .J G o• -- m MICHELLE PARPARIAN e �oJ es) o N y SOUTHEASTERN ALLIANCE TITLE AGENCY Z R, FnVisNEo 6Loo¢ Gercu GOiGH s6 p • !cc✓ 2490 s.✓ 9•se G9 r r,,o 25,v, e4.lest /o *os OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY D o 2v ' ' j NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE CO, b b/o COMMONWEALTH UNITED MORTGAGE, c 0 p / (-ID:..".:' • Is; 4-4q,z, :5!„,..,�r.o' _ ._. ........ _— .. .... 71 29.70. . :�74 T . e•r3•Aic ,� k l/o fiZI rip ') Y '/�.?, s. ne0 eak re. .� t y— N o.74 ..o,'ryJ C mg> 1 � ,���, lro.) �3��'//9 J L '6 et-- t r:�iM„Nr Irrt z.�._ 11f ..\ ;� BOUNDARY SURVEY `-FvuNo l ir,o✓eao �yva�F� I yam. (/✓e'C<P) , I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SKETCH SHOWN HEREON IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY MADE UNDER MY DIRECTION, AND THAT SAID SURVEY IS ACCURATE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. THERE ARE NO LOT 4 APPARENT GROUND ENCROACHMENTS, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN AND THAT THE SURVEY MEETS THE.MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472,027, • FLORIDA STATUTES AND CHAPTER 61017-6 OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. • DATE: pLGK/A, Sr'rn'0U7 ti93/7 /2 /9 / jL£S' dPO1Te • Voon7L(,t,55(P/a4.rr r6�T 693/b.-'�z/o4 z'^� I / REGISTERED SURVEYOR NO. PROPERTY SHOWN'HEREONHAS NOT ti BEEN ABSTRACTED BY SURVEYOR FOR RIGHTS-OF-WAY, AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD; ELEVA- TIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON N.G,V, DATUM UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED; ALL PROPERTY CORNERS ARE IRON ROD WITH CAPS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED; FOUNDATION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS LYING BELOW SURFACE NOT LOCATED, BEARINGS AND/OR ANGLES • SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON RECORD PLAT OR DEED CALLS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. MEASUREMENTS MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNITED STATES STANDARD. UNLESS IT BEARS THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA UCENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER THIS DRAWING OR SKETCH IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT VALID. COPYRIGHEID 2002 BY RICHARD I.SHEPHARD&ASSOCIATES,INC. -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED LB 2102 Joe Tooker LOT 3 BLOCK 70 ADDRESS: ...! ", . 1i71:445 AMENDED PLAT OF SUNDY 123 S. SWINTON AVENUE AND CROMER'S SUBDIVISION DELRAY BEACH, FL 33444 ALA\ PLAT BOOK 6 PAGE 17 FLOOD ZONE "X" RICHARD L. SHEPHARD and Associates .PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA COMMUNITY: CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL Phone, PANEL NO.: 125102-0004-D 219 SCALE: 1'=20' BY:H. MILHOMME DRAWING NO. S.E.23RD AVENUE Boca 561 391-43e5 MAP REVISED: JANUARY 5, 1989 P.0,BOX 759 Bnton 737- 46 DATE: 9/2/03 FB: 684 PC: 21 NO3-09-061 BOYNTON BEACH,FLORIDA 33435 FAX (561)551 734-657548 S.E.1st STREET _o..r, /i l/e.5. //L11U111/U1l a%tl✓ —-- WI — i I ,._r ;r, 3, / ALLEY RIGHT OE WAY 'Oa �j, - r_ /t� / ����%�%///////{///.'a� .w..... F /Ilr - - I I ,/ � — ro Bei L o'S4(M 7.Zi—:laB'--— rSudt 6. 1 ) Y j � j5'R)� Arc? fir, ^ curs n.t h•c✓r-�.-.� a' ,rk"p " .'t_12 -- :CI";,... C - W - `' •Q' r '/ 1 .•w 4 �.:w°1r NAY/ N N Z I ,a o i. ID[�4 Nn W „j k., .A.a. \ t i -t - Q/7 ,'",`� I I _a N� GY;S ii45 L�'l!d CO I // I _� �C. E. zS.E.z a STREET1 0 9 iB' VL JillTilI iC x]'--t p"" a =III aa} -i-, L -,-- I0 I •fo,c°r gr / Anwrcf nrrY•"n.ua. Z 1ENvc 1 r _ +'1in T ,��, I I —�� VIM.cr viNtAoc ,L51111111111 (r) cWIAT BIRCH,FLORIDA IN li 1 WI,It tat tot/ottt • •' d 00, MN I• FINISH FLOOR 20.60 1 RESIDENCE I co.a,fY.N.. I.r.,s I,.,r scu,,t, ; "' I " ii II �..: .,.t� ..It ILL,,rout.,,• I STREET i. ;� R g?s EPEES a onrc xr .. R 1 R ri SITS ORRINAOC qM1q �I ,' two,. ♦ 1 .i 1 gN TOPICAL PARKING SPACES DETAIL SITE LOCATION MAP K'C '�I Y .Ir.11 gl ♦l 1 0 ^1 2 I !�_ PROPERTY DESCRIPTION IL j EXISTING 0 I I STORY ADC 3 dt0NO.r 2a Apoorr, arcpLA a s9NJr Aa.V AA, 0Gt 6.ION. BUILDING I 77.09 In,c ro♦HAII:C RCG0903 CR PA,'BEACH 000AN.rl.0o°:Y 4 PACE B[v,f I o N f I I I I 1 —® 99 Ws I x 1 SITE DRAINAGE $ •i 1 uvrN: tx,t^Nc PacPcs(3 N ronAro.weaceRI 831011E REArr P a.].2 SO..(I, 2,130 SO./r A1TA7LNr B 3Jf4AINS 2a33 SO..PT; 2.0.0 S0 PP I I !AMMAR( ,.CT]S0 fr, an,.SO/. I I w7(AAO,/S Art, .JCO Sa/1 4,r0 Sa/i o PERYOV3,RCA LS).S0.ft L..SO/I. p I VT DRA,NAC[[ATRIA: • R(IUN IS'a RONDO.OITR n,C N(t I,VP[RNCUS AR(A I I I I rCR Ter carts cr Btratax RRC-sama.r,ANJ POST at,r"iN(Nr WLUNC•rao.Ara.a - v01Uvf RR0NGfa:talrv41(NT;S tr:Sr,NC JAA,NAJ9 Srtrfw I cavanonz A.t' .F.S. r J. . I .a0. t•lo' I .vluu((rt6A,AfP,N trrxaAn°N TRCNcw =sr WA NM V.l(A(NT•ay.-Dv,2A0.)•(1.]3••IVOa)) •... �2 .a.l3 AC.1N.-1.>2]fu/r, 1 L A L —._—T_.;ISITj•2aao— • " ..av,.. .,a.no ----- .-.— .——— • ///// / // /// I'MBA CVtRA 2 f ,3,/, / ]a �/SWINTON AVENUE LEGEND PATE ♦ ( tam:.JRADC .,e.» 0 1 f s u t o r o R N ///j/j��j/ o REVIEW Oo 0•couu LNrt ♦R OnSCa:ACC C� ...... O NOi IOa CONSIIIVCTION P. CI I[Rult arRccnav a 0 caxfrauct,Ox suR/Ac[RUNcr/ W ISSUE UTE II/11/04 s-at-�] S / T E P L A N / I INLET NUYft[ .II' SCALD: ,'.,0' • C.I • • 00 te4c.Imp.,,.Mo1•n.,reca..en.m m 0,..wYe swim ,. ..•e.w.wcw,.•pe,Pen•m.Wmm . 1•w/!n4vM1•In.WM Wd w... ve•er*,vw 31.00!SA IIM6E0 VI PLAN •vrrcr•n.v I AKA,'•.e, MnWt•,m.,. 1I.3,3.0.1 111//,!ll/��«,w,.(o / W.-,°.�.p.r..,n...,.rd. mob.•.. pr.,.I iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii� !! iii • a PM.......,..0. w,W.1 • b r e /!� 15' ALLEY RIGHT OF WAY NT an�'w..n ,.,ran.*e. IS' ALLEY RIGHT or W•Y .Jil Ir ..—..--"—r— (1 SITE DATA O.. • �rw Sono' Wr.r,.�p• p�•..�.. , So.00'fop, .,r.,,r� -I :.. • j� AC,np•r.1.w.e.,., j j ® ,.aP;� n;,, ro."•.,.e........., • • �\ are.m.,..nWe., 11.14 II. Q a•,a E Is)• �, %ERISCMECAICUUTIONS ``� re B Ali • .N la w"u I , . -• .--�� a MOM...°ocww mow p.m.e,...e.nXs ¢la.rtec,a awolomo:r � d� � JO' , ,I' U a YnM � ! _ t r.,n•.,,x .o m Ir1.f.n 11\ • �w1%. . -I r.lr..:4 ? "p '> tip • ro •a O U N Ii .'•nr`*, .1 1......a....r"r A © � w11 y w N i • PROPOSED EXTG.MATERAL SCHEDULE f� PROPOSED I ./ f[.,KAR .PIM,,,.V1,xl Ce 2 STORY ,1, Key Botanical/Common Name 0 , 2 STORY 1 ), x I. RESIDENCE RESIDENCE • j 1 ict Sex In u,e .//c.." 4... � MI • ' I m 04 0. ' jro w tatomresp,A. .wo mw i Z U= 11 r 'm""°n. , w W Q u MI FireanTel lmprvWllmpon fors • /��F Qp1 New nonbosmaprolopsown//12. / •� ,^ Q T f.+mbWocawneu bwl.0ew, 1 V I InI ' _ KWIK(M) we" WXF Poprwu , ® Z b •• ^' Pa PROPOSED MATERIAL SCHEDULE r:.wrt tvrc.ycn fnws(n I In • on. NW evr,bulCanmen M.m. eu. 4 EXISTING (I) E%ISTINY 1 I STORY I leN wee..e.o.rob u..,nel.ra n.ne.. (STORY ©:+. -M ,J BUILDING e1u Lem.rmwuavmea.neo...,n,«..e i..ieax G BUILDING LL.. NO-1 PpNapm.ee.nu...Nnpmad•. xM1 e ` 0 �- j _ e MI. a M.ne..e.x•.wempen.mwu x pp,ox'o.. = r f Star .w l.m MwIM 61 h u u n ssir.m.µ p.lerra x xm'R (� cwreaLrerw was .v. m,• i«w.e..ei.i • Q 410 ., i.• �v ( L J_ o YAW..]1i10'kJ i,-.7.17:,.......,...,....,:r.=.7=7:.:=.—,—.--, i III( - .„,_Mt p,x rRM �kflW(MII. MillOP if O O /n w.*,..m.M..a.....n.. -..ma,..per tl..,.wwrw..tl..n • �1 • ICiM,DRNX1 O .I, w ,/> ,iOw """„` ...�P © i/�I t / a Wye Q IC AI V cuY9 nx9 cu,i[v—�- ,..uws......•.,...r...v«.....*,.�.,.v"..1>.,...,...n...,.• Cl [ . I 4. % — -cuaa nx1+TLJLr=e(\� -t 1n fn /it, • .. ..... • / /// 611 r i0.10 ' NTON AVENUE / . , .. •..4..',,Vikt"iita:!Sea'' ....".* *4. ‘...:‘. •. ". p.e `WINTON AVENUE A a o>o / A V • 9-17-02 / ........ •- Ili W.. ..1°r. �" 02.09.14 _ 1 kS:�.,1::ter._'.. y • ,..H SITE PLAN' .r a r • a SITE PLAN ".1114 'Y6hjtii'. . .i/i8ii` 4 r Et • DATA / /— — Jeffrey Silberstein I [uDwna x u va rAvcs D x u SIX I 'Architect&Associates,Inc. n mu a SO.IT. e.v.SO.IT. Iv.3]l:r luart a•la l• n'.c.. i.>a art. xRsxa vi nw sa.rr. si[x ar ss �e+i•ravl•u<s x.lss sa rr. a srz law sa.n. x✓sa el+ne lm w.wowa e..a,rmu aw [ lnrt. 3'.Ax cr aT xw.sa n. a.s cr sm yusAx[+ 2.w4 Si n. eo.e x u n 4,170 sa Pt ea.x or VI °O`o• +Au x.»4 SD.rt. :CZ]u an 3..D.Si.rt. :e.e x Y vrz Tx:a1-3x61311 ru:misnmm oid ScnocL�iDmu nsrcuD uts MULCT(wlx+o) — It — — �� — — yLa v ww• v 1541 www,allbershinatchltett.corn ix un0 USX rux,Cm[A YIALD SC COxu) •Ir -- w]-e a ] License M36000T7e re.[DUTA[D-1.30/.cc• 3.31 suns a•,y• r.«ry Na IUGro3D0u, 1 cax..eT / NµMON"7O;♦�1 y Mg ir.c[[31 ru us u.].(WM t / Ae3"TM ' Pryr 1 r D m1n, L3D • Q o I11CAI a ACvm[0, 1.ro sT.no.AO sr.as,xnuDln0 one / �xI♦n C.O.WALL ��e°�ram••�*of �IDUu[D ACTUAL . •. Q -- 'win ary MIW. 4„,..,Tr.1 \ 1,Sv \\ �1 , M'RY Iwi myrmrM. 1.45' jai �0� ]rJYYCLIIt1 ... �1 IINTIV 7.5' r1aATn fIa[3.B•. SD.Tx%C[rs. 1 .,:,, ► C a .a.� , 111. " ' HOUSE OF VINTAGE 123 S.SWINTON A ENUE IALD -D x.x 0 1 ° 1i!' "} _ DELRAY BEACH, IDA 40 e!x 4, ' F A A I b.To r "'1 1. lif s' 1 AS /AT.0,3rru.rlµx $1 D .DD.,0 w S.ItOCx 30. [nC[D rui Gr Saar al CUIYG•3 _-I w+�� � <;). I Xw'zlOn,•CCc3CIni xOry L rut tn[A[C01.•f RECORDED'x rut f'•_ lD1 Au r,ar in[ c tt0Ac3 r r.0 c•cx COUNTY, F. r. (L 1.13 ?wrear nma WC.lrn3.TL+m, (1 °s arra 0.1 1 '14.11,4 r[Xx1x1 rcx PAL SrnnAW AND rut Auxx Q 2 ro,A connaTe rm rLnn es ---- !r_1 bt-- °GROUND FL ADDITION TOTAL 50.FT� 4 SECOND FLOOR TOTAL 50.FTOb 0 3 SGALEt 1/5". I'-0" OSGALE I/B". I'-O" E,..-,H-L.-. ,14,..... -___: 1111 -=_.�L[I1111 Lu �——-�—— _ :�p: en ...111111.111.1 'MM. — MN. taa _ - �� '- 'I gQ�lli AO.vu v r t"r �u:y�Y ro.o.000N mialnum JI ..a>....lonumiE 3 Li �,T a ��...ar °MIIIIWIII���������5����� A A 9 -•—� r— REVIIONS Li a , Ali 11111111 o 90,3,... "' r LOC+nOn3LY KT... LOCATION MAPMira . DECEMBER 23,2004 _A- .0 V Drawn b;TDB l OTHIRD FLOOR TOTAL 50.FT.345 1 5 SGALEt ve". r-a. (ROOF PLAN + D.+Nwferain`Ac¢wVA3 Umrv1 •ewe_ _1 fir.wp I SGALES 1/8"= I'-O" • Jeffrey Silberstein I Mnaect l Aetodetet.Inc. 555r ,i,, a eta N• •na•,r••, p al / PARAPET l allrtllllle 110141 33413 7 Da,.MO' y a'.,.n>• Tel: tt,.n••ttte — t n.; nI.ne.ont p� 59.76' I t 1' �yYI p �1�' b MEAN YT �_ T l� 1,1 1.,11:111i11r111I.Illlllltl..t11 1 4 4. { tl Aw.1l.e1 w.qOW..., a serr THIRD FLOOR l' .--.._ req. r°btil.w1..av r...r,w. dI' T • 10,� :ff: 9 -`�� {SECOND �.:o :i '+� j i ri r«m..o�4w.°.l-, 1 , b p4. ; ; =- 4115 �' HOUSE OF VINTAGE 9 ‘' . I �f� A 'rI Ii-—— �lll���1<<1 I I� 123 S.SWINTON AVENUE PIN15r,rLOOR DELRAY BEACH,FLORIDA ,E.55 (,5 AVERA6E MEAN l Q a ELEVATIOv N GROWN Cr ROAD SOVTH ELEVATION - ONORTH ELEVATION SCALE: I/8"= I'-O" SCALE, I/8"= 1-0" LEGEND OF MATERIALS EPLOAT rrwu e-ucco d� pi .TAINLE65 STec_GA!_e RAIL 1 Ot 61AVDI46 5EA•1,ALVALN^ROOT.6ILVE4 s 0 GLCA11 6LA56 GO`�AGT WMOOWS I DOORS WTH 1" WHITt FMNaS Et E GOMGRGTE 6T2D.CW I O ' 4V/ PARAPET \y� ECTONp O GDRG.STG DALGON" TOP OF ROOT r�k n qtr ' J—.—'C-r— a2q5' 1 _._ THIRD r.00R T I I I: r 1 _I., 4 I I I ill 1 QPI , i 4 i h I II y a. ia '—' rim- ^ I 51.V, A `e'b•, ' ._ y•a ram_ 1 _ SECOND FLOOR '1C �,,_ ilaeMW/M •Ln 1+•+�14•N L ■II.u.4 urr■ J■.��n n n 6 ire i.■'— 1 'f'�■'� 4 0 9IIII 'I JO.60. 2,121 1 j l =Ob__ J „� I IIn1 INe.,,.. l II-,I!, 91II ill J II l:l'- i�,�Y l • Y'rrt� FIRST FLOOR � 15.55' A vc p a AVERA6E MEAN ELEVATION CROWN OF ROAD REVISIONS EAST ELEVATION SECTION 5 EXISTIKG WEST ELEVATION =SCALE: I/8" 1'-0" SCALE, I/8"= 1'-O' O5CALEI I/8"a I'-O" I A-2.0 1 I Drawn by:IDS IG:U¢nlleclureAProleCPMlx UteWlntepeldwptldTD ane 11 15_Od awp DELL RAYR BEACH F 1 D A All-AmericaCity I , 1993 2001 SIGN IN SHEET 2001 Regular Historic Preservation Board Meeting REGULAR MEETING April 20, 2005 PRINT FULL NAME ADDRESS OR ITEM NO. ORGANIZATION RGANIZATION lidfSzzi Po/AI;-cr-- ()(c)itit--4' 7z/f/r. t-/z7V9v(-. ,c,==vve, GL Lt \+t