The URL can be used to link to this page

HPB 01-12-05 �.� o AGENDA az HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING � � y P CITY OF DELRAY BEACH -4 . 64 Meeting Date: January 12, 2005 Type of Meeting: Special Meeting Location: First Floor Conference Room Time: 6:00 P.M. The City shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contact Doug Randolph at 243-7127(voice), or 243-7199(TDD), 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for the City to reasonably accommodate your request. Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the Commission Chambers. !f a person decides to appeal any decision made by the-Historic Preservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hearing,such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Two or more City Commissioners may be in attendance. I. CALL TO ORDER II. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS A. 799 NE 2nd Avenue, Del-Ida Park Historic District, William Domeyer, Owner Reconsideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with the removal of wood shakes from a roof and their replacement with metal roofing on an existing commercial building. B. 133 NW 5th Avenue, West Settlers Historic District, William Bowden, Owner Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of storm protection on a non-contributing residence. C. 101 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District, Kupi & Eliopoulos Architects Consideration of a COA request for the replacement of a damaged cedar shake roof with a metal roof on a contributing dwelling, and the replacement of an asphalt shingle roof with a metal roof to the dwelling's associated guest cottage. III. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. 238 NE 5th Terrace, Del-Ida Park Historic District, Tullia Taylor, Owner Proposal for the development/demolition of an existing residential duplex building. IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments B. Reports from Historic District Representatives C. Board Members D. Staff IV. ADJOURN 01) 1 ' Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner POSTED ON: January 10, 2005 MINUTES OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD PUBLIC HEARING SPECIAL MEETING CITY OF DELRAY BEACH DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA MEETING DATE: January 12, 2005 LOCATION: First Floor Conference Room MEMBERS PRESENT: Francisco Perez-Azua, Michelle Reich, John Miller, Linda Lake, and Jeffrey Silberstein MEMBERS ABSENT: Randee Schatz, and Maura Dersh STAFF PRESENT: Warren Adams, Denise Valek, and Terrill Pyburn I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Perez at 6:01 p.m. Upon roll call it was determined that a quorum was present. No one from the Public addressed the Board on non-agenda items. Chairman Perez read a summary of the Quasi-Judicial Hearing procedures. The Notary swore in individuals for testimony. II. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS A. 799 NE 2"d Avenue, Del-Ida Park Historic District, Dr. William Domever, Owner Item Before the Board: Reconsideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness request for the replacement of a wood shake roof with a "regal blue" metal roofing on a non-contributing dwelling, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. There were none. Mr. Adams presented the item to the Board and entered a copy of the project file into the record. The property consists of Lots 1 & 2, Block 12, Del-Ida Park and is situated between NE 2nd Avenue, Palm Court and George Bush Boulevard. The structure is a 2,000 sq. ft. Ranch style structure constructed in 1950 and is considered a non-contributing dwelling within the Del-Ida Park Historic District. The property is zoned RO (Residential Office) and is currently in use as an Orthodontics office. In June 1985, a request was submitted to remodel the building by replacing the existing cement tiles with cedar shakes, and applying rough-cut cedar to the fascia, overhangs, and stucco walls. By May 1988 the roof alterations had been completed and a COA request was Historic Preservation Board Minutes January 12, 2005 submitted to change the application to the walls from rough-cut to 1" x 6" tongue and groove cedar, which was subsequently installed. The proposed project consists of the replacement of the wood shakes with a "regal blue" Sem-Lok standing seam panel metal roof. According to the contractor, the current roof covering is defective and replacing it with similar wood shakes would result in these defects occurring again in the near future whereas the metal covering will have a longer life span. While re-roofing, either repairs or replacement, is typically reviewed and approved administratively, replacement of a roof with new materials as well as a color change require Board approval. During the meeting of December 15, 2004 the Board approved the replacement of the wood shakes with a Sem-Lok standing seam panel metal roof subject to the following condition: 1) That the proposed color of the metal be chromatic with a choice of the following Sem-Lok metal roofing colors in keeping with the architecture of the subject property: Slate Gray, Onyx gray or, Colonial White. The applicant who was unable to attend the December 15, 2004 meeting is now before the Board for reconsideration of this as he does not wish to use any of the specified colors and the recommendation is to move approval of the COA as conditioned in the December 15, 2004 for 799 NE 2nd Avenue. Dr. William Domeyer, applicant, thanked the Board for approving the metal roof, and advised he does not have an objection to white. I am into the water and boats and the interior of my office is nautical and I thought this would be a good way to coordinate with the color of the building. There are some buildings around with blue trim. There are a lot of green, aqua, and teal roofs on homes and businesses in the area. The green roof has been approved in the past. There are no blue roofs, but there weren't green roofs till about ten years ago. Therefore, why not start the blue roofs. I think it would be an asset to the area. I am not trying to override the Board, but my feeling is it would be advantageous to the area. Maybe it is time to make a change. If you don't approve the blue I would like to go with the Teal roof. The Banyan tree in front of the office drops red berries on the roof and I would prefer a darker color roof. Mr. Adams advised that staff recommended one of the shades of gray would be appropriate. Chairman Perez asked if the Board had any comments. Ms. Lake advised she does not have a problem with the blue roof. There is a structure in that area there is a structure that has a bright yellow roof. Mr. Miller advised being the building is non-contributing and architecturally pleasing and I don't have a problem with the blue roof. Ms. Reich advised from an aesthetic point of view a metal roof should have the coloration of metal and should not be a color. I have a problem with the blue roof not with what it is going to do to the community. I see metal as metal. The Slate gray is the darkest color and would 2 Historic Preservation Board Minutes January 12, 2005 have less maintenance with the tree problem, and I think it would look good with the blue shutters. Mr. Silberstein advised although the house is not contributing, he is not comfortable with the blue roof. It is a small wood frame house and it is too a strong color. It becomes even less contributing with the blue which is for a commercial type application. I feel it should be a light color. Chairman Perez advised he feels the same way as Mr. Silberstein. The blue roof would make the building look heavy and commercialized. The blue shutters would look great but so much metal will look too commercial and will stand out too much along side the neighboring properties. A lighter color will reflect the heat away from the building, whether it is blue or gray the darker color will absorb more heat. Dr. Domeyer asked if teal would be acceptable. The Board advised teal was much too dark. Dr. Domeyer advised that Mr. Federspeil's office has a teal roof, and the Sundy House has a metal roof. Chairman Perez advised the Sundy House has a copper roof (patina) and if Dr. Domeyer wanted to go with a patina that would be fine as it blends in with the landscape better. We are trying to choose a color that doesn't stand out, and the patina will blend in better. Mr. Silberstein advised the blue and green that Dr. Domeyer likes is very opaque. The Sundy House roof is not opaque there are a lot of variations and that is what gives the roof depth. The Board concurred that Dr. Domeyer could choose the Patina Green. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none. Chairman Perez closed the public hearing. It was moved by Mr. Silberstein, seconded by Ms. Reich and approved 3 to 2 (Ms. Lake and Mr. Miller voted no) to move approval of the COA for 799 NE 2"d Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(J), 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8) (a), (b), (g), and (h) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following condition: 1) That the proposed color of the metal roof be changed to a less dominant color more in keeping with the architecture of the subject property with a choice of the following Sem- Lok roofing colors: Slate Gray, Onyx Gray, Colonial White, or Patina Green. 3 Historic Preservation Board Minutes January 12, 2005 B. 133 NW 5th Avenue, West Settlers Historic District, William Bowden, Owner Item Before the Board: Consider a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of storm protection on a non-contributing residence. Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. There were none. Mr. Adams presented the item to the Board and entered a copy of the project file into the record. The subject property is situated on the east side of NW 5th Avenue between NW 1st Street and Martin Luther King Jr. Drive. The property was built in 1959, is of CBS construction and consists of 10 apartment units. It is considered a non-contributing building in the West Settlers Historic District and is currently zoned General Commercial (GC). There are no recent administrative or Board actions pertaining to this property. The current proposal involves the repair of Unit 7 which was recently damaged by fire. Although the majority of the repairs are internal, the applicant is replacing the windows (which have been approved administratively) and fitting them with storm panels, which requires Board approval. The storm panels consist of 20 Gauge galvanized steel panels that will attach to the dwelling via tracks or channels at the top of the opening and will be bolted directly to the building at the base. Panels will be installed on the approach of a storm and will be stored when not in use. The installation of the proposed removable storm panels can be supported as they are the least obtrusive form of storm protection. As the tracks require minimal hardware, there is little concern that the installation could irreparably damage the exterior of the building. However, in order to camouflage the tracks, a condition of approval has been added to paint the tracks to match the color of the building. The project, as proposed, can therefore be supported based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, once the condition of approval to paint the tracks and the storm panels has been met. Therefore, recommendation is to move approval of the COA request for 133 NW 5th Avenue subject to the following condition: That the tracks and panels are painted to match the exterior of the building. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. There were none Chairman Perez asked if the Board had any comments. Ms. Reich inquired how is the rest of the building being handled. Mr. Adams advised the applicant advised he is replacing the windows that were damaged with non-storm resistant glass. He has to install shutters on these windows. No application has been needed for the other windows. Chairman Perez closed the public hearing. 4 Historic Preservation Board Minutes January 12, 2005 It was moved by Mr. Miller, seconded by Mr. Silberstein, and approved 5 to 0 to Move approval of the COA request for 133 NW 5th Avenue by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) of the Land Development Regulations and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, subject to the following condition: 1) That the tracks or channels are painted to match the exterior of the building. C. 101 Dixie Boulevard, Del-Ida Park Historic District, Kupi & Eliopoulos Architects Item Before the Board: Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness associated with the removal of wood shakes from a roof and their replacement with metal roofing on an existing commercial building. Chairman Perez asked if there were any ex-parte communications. There were none. Mr. Adams presented the item to the Board and entered a copy of the project file into the record. The subject property consists of the northeast 25' of Lots 18 & 19, and the west '/2 of Lot 20, Block 4, Del-Ida Park, and is located on the northwest side of Dixie Boulevard between Swinton Avenue and NE 2nd Avenue. The property contains a contributing 2,212 sq. ft., one story Frame Vernacular style dwelling constructed in 1939, and a 1,030 sq. ft., one story guest cottage to the rear constructed in 1950. The property is located within the Del-Ida Park Historic District, is zoned R-1-AA (Single Family Residential) and is currently in use as a residence. There has been no recent Board or administrative actions pertaining to this property. The proposed project consists of the replacement of the dwelling's damaged cedar shake roof and the guest cottage's asphalt shingles with a 5V-crimp metal roof with mill finish. While re-roofing utilizing similar materials associated with repair or replacement is typically reviewed and approved administratively, the replacement of a roof with new materials requires Board approval. LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(a, b, g, h) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The applicable standards are as follows: • (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. • (E)(8) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: (a) height, (b) front façade proportion, (g) consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color, and (h) roof shapes with the predominant designs and materials used being visually compatible with the surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district. 5 Historic Preservation Board Minutes January 12, 2005 The Delray Beach Design Guidelines states the following with respect to roofs: Preserve the roofs shapes, decorative features, and materials, as well as its patterning, color, and size. Stripping the roof of its historic material, i.e. slate, clay tile, wood, or architectural metal is inappropriate. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation suggest the following: The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. The proposed project consists of the replacement of the dwelling's damaged cedar shake roof and the guest cottage's asphalt shingles with metal roofing with a mill finish. The metal roofing will not be visually compatible with the dwelling and the proposed replacement is not within the standards as directed by the LDRs, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines or the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. The cedar shakes and asphalt shingles appear to be the original roof coverings of the dwelling and guest cottage respectively and the stripping of historic roofing materials is deemed to be inappropriate. The historic fabric should be retained where possible; however, where the severity of deterioration requires replacement, the new feature should match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. The proposed metal roofing does not match any of the above requirements; however, the treatment is reversible, the life span of a metal roof will exceed that of a shingle roof, and the mill finish color will not dominate the structures. A number of other properties in close proximity have recently replaced their roofs with metal roofs. On July 16, 2003, the Board approved the conversion of the nearby non-contributing, one story duplex to an office at 230-232 Palm Court which included replacing the asphalt shingles with a standing seam "gavelum" roof with a mill finish and, on December 15, 2004, Board approval was given for the replacement of the cedar shake roof with metal roofing on the non-contributing property at 799 NE 2nd Avenue on the condition that the color was either gray or white. However, in each of these examples the structures were non-contributing. Replacement of this type for contributing structures clearly is inconsistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation as well as the Delray Beach Design Guidelines therefore positive findings cannot be made with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(a, b, g, h), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Staff is recommending denial. Chairman Perez asked if the Board had any comments. Mr. Gary Eliopoulos, Architect, applicant, advised they purchased the house the beginning of September. I do not disagree with the staff report. This house was affected by the hurricanes, the owner is out of the country, and the roof is damaged. The insurance company will provide assistance. We wanted to replace the roof prior to closing so the insurance money would kick in. As far as guidelines at the State level, it is true that they talk 6 Historic Preservation Board Minutes January 12, 2005 about materials that are appropriate. In other areas in the Guidelines when they talk about appropriate, a lot of the homes down here were built and designed by Northeastern people. Cedar shakes are appropriate up north but they are not appropriate here. They are contributing to the termite and moisture problems. If you are going to preserve these structures let's try to do a restoration and make it as correct as possible or preserve the structure, and sometimes you have to step away from the historic material that was originally there. A metal roof has proven to last. I think it accents the architecture and cedar shake seems to give a heavier look to the house. I don't think this Board or the City would be setting a precedent by doing this as there are clearly more significant buildings in town where we have changed the materials. I was involved with the Spady Museum, where the windows were replaced. A wood window that meets the County Hurricane Guidelines is expensive and is hard to come by. They now say the aluminum windows are appropriate. The Sundy House is a great example. You are taking a roof that is more expensive. The copper roofs that were put on the Sundy House and it will last forever. Virginia Schneider's house is the true example of a Key West home in Delray and that has a copper roof. The Old School Square has a tile roof. I don't think this will hurt the character or diminish the value of the property. Mr. Adams advised he can see the applicant's point of view; however, my job is to clearly preserve the material where possible. Where do you stop? As brick would last longer than wooden siding so should we clad future buildings with brick? The aluminum windows resemble the wood windows, there is a likeness there. Replacing a cedar shake roof with a metal roof is changing the appearance of the building. Chairman Perez asked if there was anyone from the public who wished to address the Board. Mr. Silberstein can understand what Mr. Adams is saying, however, if this house originally had a metal roof it would have been considered historic. If it is appropriate and compatible. If he said he wanted to change the siding I would have disagreed. I think the metal roof as proposed does work with the architecture and both structures will have the same roof and presently they do not have the same roof. I feel it is a good solution to this problem. Cedar shakes do not work in this environment. I don't think it is a wise choice to replace the roof with the same material. Ms. Reich advised there are a lot of cedar roofs. These roofs give the character and essence for the period. We are looking for authenticity. Mr. Eliopoulos advised that corrugated metal roofs have been around for years, and metal roofs are historic. Mr. Silberstein advised it might have been the owner's choice. The materials are compatible with either cedar or metal. Mr. Perez thinks the metal roof is compatible. It is widely used in buildings and restorations around town. It is fitting with the architecture. I can understand both sides, but I think the metal roof fits with the architecture. Cedar shakes are not fitting for this environment. 7 Historic Preservation Board Minutes January 12, 2005 Mr. Miller feels the metal or cedar would look good. It is unfortunate we are changing the material. I am familiar with cedar roofs and they do not last. As a matter of practicality I reluctantly agree to go with the metal roof. Chairman Perez closed the public hearing. It was moved by Mr. Silberstein, seconded by Ms. Lake, and approved 4 to 1 (Ms. Reich voted no) to move approval of the COA for 101 Dixie Boulevard, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(J), 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8) (a), (b), (g) and (h) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. III. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. 238 NE 5th Terrace, Del-Ida Park Historic District, Tulia Taylor, Owner Proposal for the development/demolition of an existing residential duplex. Mr. Adams advised he met with Ms. Taylor and she wants to see if she is going in the right direction. She has a duplex and the lot behind it. The property was built in 1954 and it is now fifty years old and is considered noncontributing. The walls of the duplex are strong enough to support a second floor. She wants to retain the duplex use the first floor as an office and construct apartments above it. Ms. Taylor wants to know if the Board would be happy with that. If it is appropriate we will push ahead. Mr. Silberstein advised it would be a good idea to demolish it as it is a non-contributing building and is not very attractive. She also needs to get an architect. Mr. Adams advised she is on vacation this week and is in a rush to get this done. She wanted input from the Board so she can move forward, by demolition or adding a second floor. Mr. Silberstein advised he cannot comment on the proposal as she needs to get an architect. He also advised if it meets the LDRs the height can be doubled. The Board concurred that Ms. Taylor must obtain an architect. Mr. Silberstein inquired if it met the setback standards. Mr. Adams advised it did meet the standards. Chairman Perez advised we cannot comment on the drawing, however, a two story structure is fine with us. B. Demolition Order Ms. Pyburn advised that according to our LDRs we have to submit a Board Order for the demolition. Mr. Shutt was present at that meeting and drafted this Final Order. He requested that the Board review it. If any other items come before the Board for demolition 8 , Historic Preservation Board Minutes January 12, 2005 that we choose to deny it the Board Order will be in similar format. It will only require the Chair's signature. We have to submit a Final Order executed by the Chairman for the demolition that was denied at the Historic Preservation Board meeting on December 15, 2004 relative to Mako Technologies, 145 N. Swinton Avenue. Mr. Silberstein spoke to Mr. Shutt relative to this form and he wanted to bring it to the attention of the Board. I agree with this but the Board should be aware why this has come forward. The applicant submitted a request not for demolition, but for staff to recommend what they feel we should do. When staff presented this project to the Board they presented it as a demolition request. The applicant did not have a chance to respond to this. The applicant has not had a chance to respond to this if they could have had the opportunity to come back and show evidence for financial hardship. We are working to preserve the building, and have decided to move forward. There was a misunderstanding the way this project was presented. We are moving forward with adding on to the house and we are working with staff on waivers. Mr. Silberstein advised he agrees with the Order. It was moved by Mr. Miller, seconded by Ms. Reich, and passed 5 to 0 to move approval of the denied demolition of 145 N. Swinton Avenue, Delray Beach, FL. IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments - None B. Reports from Historic District Representatives - None C. Board Members Mr. Adams discussed the status of the home on Palm Square. We received a COA and we can start moving forward. Mr. Adams spoke to the owners who were completely unaware they have to get permission to make any changes. They advised they spoke to someone from the City and were advised they did not need permission. They were apologetic and they said in the COA that they had to cut the trees due to storm damage. One of the landscape architects advised if that was the case it was alright. I will be writing to them. Mr. Adams advised he will write a letter to them, and will make some suggestions relative to the colors. Mr. Silberstein questioned when we get the items can we get a map for each item? Because some times I want to look at the property, and a map would be helpful. Ms. Pyburn advised if you do that you must disclose that you drove by the property. Mr. Silberstein advised he brought that issue up a while ago and was told it was not necessary if you only did a drive by. Ms. Pyburn mentioned if you gain a new perspective on the project after driving by and it has changed your position you should disclose it. Even if you just drove by you should disclose it. Mr. Silberstein asked Ms. Pyburn if there was another way to present the staff reports in a more concise format so Mr. Adams doesn't have to read the entire report. 9 Historic Preservation Board Minutes January 12, 2005 Ms. Pyburn advised the Planning and Zoning and the City's Attorney have been working on trying to make the agendas and Staff Reports a little shorter. Unfortunately, for Quasi Judicial procedures it is a matter of keeping the record clear and making sure you understand that position and it is clear not only to the applicant but the public. If the report is not read into the record it might not be clear and that could present legal problems later on. It is a matter of protecting the City and yourself. D. Staff Mr. Silberstein spoke to Mr. Shutt relative to this form and he wanted to bring it to the attention of the Board. I agree with this but the Board should be aware why this has come forward. The applicant submitted a request for staff to recommend what they feel we should do. When staff presented this to the Board they presented it as a demolition request. The applicant did not have a chance to respond to this. They could have had the opportunity to come back and show evidence for financial hardship. We are working to preserve the building, and have decided to move forward. There was a misunderstanding the way it was presented. We are working with staff on waivers. VI. ADJOURNMENT The Board made a motion to adjourn at 6:59 p.m. The information provided herein is the Minutes of the meeting of said body for January 12, 2005, which were formally adopted and approved by the Board on 2/0/c.9�' . CD. e 0• 7 Denise A. Valek If the Minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the Official Minutes. They will become so after review and approval, which may involve some changes. 10 DEIRAY BGCH - DEERAY EACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT 2001 Agent: W.E. Brodbeck Roofing Project Name: 799 NE 2nd Avenue Project Location: 799 NE 2nd Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is reconsideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness request for the replacement of a wood shake roof with a "regal blue" metal roof on a non- contributing dwelling, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND/PROJECT DESCRIPTION` During its meeting of December 15, 2004, the Board approved the replacement of the wood shakes with a Sem-Lok standing seam panel metal roof subject to the following condition: That the proposed color of the metal be chromatic with a choice of the following Sem-Lok roofing colors in keeping with the architecture of the subject property: Slate Gray, Onyx Gray, and Colonial White. The applicant, who was.unable to attend the December 15 meeting, is now before the Board for reconsideration of this finding as he does not wish to use any of the three specified colors. Additional background information is provided in the HPB staff report of December 15, 2004. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS`' A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the COA as conditioned on December 15, 2004 for 799 NE 2nd Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(J), 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8) (a), (b), (g) and (h) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Meeting Date:January 5,2005 Agenda Item:11.A. 799 NE 2nd Avenue-Reconsideration of roof material change from cedar shake to metal Page 2 C. Move denial of the COA as conditioned on December 15, 2004 for 799 NE 2"d Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(J), 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8) (a), (b), (g) and (h) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. RECOMMENDATION Move approval of the COA as conditioned on December 15, 2004 for 799 NE 2nd Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(J), 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8) (a), (b), (g) and (h) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Report Prepared by:Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner Attachments:HPB Staff Report 12.15.04 D[IRAT 6IACHbard iLami 1 -'"h _t t` 'Sr - DEULtY 6EACH .:-.,r.y+ � � HISTORI .� PRESERV IOI BOARD "nil MEMORANDUM STAFFs:REPORT 1995 to "s s 4 5Q r , t 1 ?001 Agent: W.E. Brodbeck Roofing Project Name: 799 NE 2"d Avenue Project Location: 799 NE 2"d Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is consideration of a COA request for the replacement of a wood shake roof with a metal roof on a non-contributing dwelling, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUNDIPROJECT DESCRIPTION The property consists of Lots 1 & 2, Block 12, Del-Ida Park and is situated between NE 2"d Avenue, Palm Court and George Bush Boulevard. The structure is a 2,000 sq.ft. Ranch style structure constructed in 1950 and is considered a non-contributing,dwelling within the Del-Ida Park Historic District. The property is zoned RO (Residential Office) and is currently in use as an orthodontics office. In June 1985, a request was submitted to remodel the building by replacing the existing cement tiles with cedar shakes, and applying rough-cut cedar to the fascia, overhangs, and stucco walls. By May 1988 the roof alterations had been completed and >a COA request was submitted to change the application to the walls from rough-cut to 1" x 6" tongue and groove cedar, which was subsequently installed. Project Description - The proposed project consists of the replacement of the wood shakes with a "regal blue" Sem-Lok standing seam panel metal roof. According to the contractor, the current roof covering is defective and replacing it with similar wood shakes would result in these defects occurring again in_the-near future whereas the metal covering will have a longer life span. While re-roofing, either repairs or replacement, is typically reviewed and approved administratively, replacement of a roof with new materials as well as a color change require Board approval. Meeting Date:December 15,2004 Agenda Item: M.A. 799 NE 2"d Avenue-Roof ma )I change from cedar shake to metal • Page 2 t Development.Standards LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(a, b, g, h) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The applicable standards are as follows: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(8) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: (a) height, (b) front façade proportion, (q) consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color, and(h) roof shapes with the predominant designs and materials used being visually compatible with the surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district. The Delray Beach Design Guidelines state the following with respect to roofs: Preserve the roof's shapes, decorative features, and materials, as well as its patterning, color, and size. Stripping the roof of its historic material, i.e. slate, clay tile, wood, or architectural metal is inappropriate. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation suggest the following: The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Analysis The proposed project is the replacement of a wood shake roof with a "regal blue" Sem- Lok standing seam panel metal roof. The building is non-contributing; however, it is situated on a prominent site at the primary entrance to the Del-Ida Park area and any alteration should be sensitive to the building's architectural style and features and the area's historic character. The proposed roof will not be visually compatible with the dwelling and the proposed replacement is not in-kind as directed by the Delray Beach Design Guidelines or the 799 NE 2"a Avenue-Roof material nge from cedar shake to metal Page 3 • Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. However, consideration must be given to the facts that the wood shakes are not the original roof covering, the treatment is reversible,_and the life span of a metal roof will exceed that of a shingle roof. Also, while this is a-non-contributing Ranch style structure in a predominantly Mediterranean Revival style area,' a. number of other properties in close proximity have replacement metal roofs On July 16, 2003,the Board approved the conversion of the nearby:non- contributing, one story duplex to an office at 230-232 Palm _Court which included replacing the asphalt shingles With.a standing seam "gavelum":roof. In this case, the proposed roof is "regal blue" in color and the building is .currently:painted white. The color of the roof will make'it stand out and dominate the structure, therefore, if Abethe Board considers the metal roof; the color should be changed to a less dominant color such as that of a;"mill finish". Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to LDR-Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(a, b-, g, h), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for:Rehabilitation. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move_approval of the COA_ for 799 NE.2"d Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2,46(J), 4 5.1(E)(4),`and:(E)(8)_(a), (b), (g) and (h) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary Of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. C. Move denial of the COA for 799 NE 2nd Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(J), 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8) (a), (b), (g) and (h) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. - RECOMMENDATION; Move approval of the COA for 799 NE 2"d Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff--report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(J), 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8) (a), (b), (g) and (h) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following condition: 1) That the proposed color of the metal be changed to a mill finish or a less dominant color more in keeping with the architecture of the subject property and the Del-Ida Park Historic District. Report Prepared by:Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner Attachments:Roof specification, photographs I. r•rspri ,T \c4 '� it ' ram�^/ r f 1. e > r F. l g ekj 1 7 i f i1 '" .. S f . ' 4 Si d• • PEUF.gAC11 UEERAY 14ACH kitts lHISTORIC -..- t PRESERVATION BOARDWI, MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT WI, 1993 _ i2907,1 2001 Agent: Michael Bowden Project Name: BTW Inc. Location: 133 NW 5th Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of storm protection on a non-contributing residence at 133 NW 5th Avenue, • pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND/PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject property is situated on the east side of NW 5th Avenue between NW 1st Street and Martin Luther King Jr. Drive. The property was built in 1959, is of CBS construction and consists of 10 apartment units. It is considered a non-contributing building in the West Settlers Historic District and is currently zoned General Commercial (GC). There are no recent administrative or Board actions pertaining to this property. The current proposal involves the repair of Unit 7 which was recently damaged by fire. Although the majority of the repairs are internal, the applicant is replacing the windows (which have been approved administratively) and fitting them with storm panels, which requires Board approval. The storm panels consist of 20 Gauge galvanized steel panels that will attach to the dwelling via tracks or channels at the top of the opening and will be bolted directly to the building at the base. Panels will be installed on the approach of a storm and will be stored when not in use. ANALYSIS LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: The Board Shall Consider: (E)(8)(g) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color of the facade of a building in association with the predominant material used in surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district. Meeting Date: January 5th,2005 Agenda Item: II.B. 133 NW 5th Avenue, Storm protection Page 2 Delray Beach Design Guidelines The following is a list of recommended treatments with respect to hurricane protection: • Window shutters that are removable are preferred. • If the tracks are to be installed year-round, they should be painted to match the exterior surface. Analysis The installation of the proposed removable storm panels can be supported as they are the least obtrusive form of storm protection. As the tracks require minimal hardware, there is little concern that the installation could irreparably damage the exterior of the building. However, in order to camouflage the tracks, a condition of approval has been added to paint the tracks to match the color of the building. The project, as proposed, can therefore be supported based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, once the condition of approval to paint the tracks for the storm panels has been met. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the COA for 133 NW 5th Avenue by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) of the Land Development Regulations and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, subject to the condition. C. Deny approval of the COA for 133 NW 5th Avenue by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) of the Land Development Regulations and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. RECOMMENDATION Move approval of the COA request for 133 NW 5th Avenue by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) of the Land Development Regulations and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, subject to the following condition: 1) That the tracks or channels are painted to match the exterior of the building. Attachments: Shutter Specs, Photographs Report Prepared by:Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner 4 M W M lflADE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FLORIDA METRO-DADE FLAGLER BUILDING BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE OFFICE(BCCO) 140 WEST FLAGLER STREET,SUITE 1603 PRODUCT CONTROL DIVISION 1 IAMl,FLORIDA 33130-1563 (305)375-2901 FAX(305)375-2908 NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE (NOA) Southeastern Metals Manufacturing Co.,Inc. 11801 Industry Drive Jacksonville,Florida 32218 SCOPE: This NOA is being issued under the applicable rules and regulations governing the use of construction materials. The documentation submitted has been reviewed by Miami-Dade County Product Control Division and accepted by the Board of Rules and Appeals(BORA)to be used in Miami Dade County and other areas where allowed by the Authority Having Jurisdiction(AHJ). This NOA shall not be valid after the expiration date stated below. The Miami-Dade County Product Control Division(In Miami Dade County) and/or the AHJ (in areas other than Miami Dade County)reserve the right to have this product or material tested for quality assurance purposes. If this product or material fails to perform in the accepted manner, the manufacturer will incur the expense of such testing and the All may immediately revoke,modify,or suspend the use of such product or material within their jurisdiction. BORA reserves the right to revoke this acceptance,if it is determined by Miami-Dade County Product Control Division that this product or material fails to meet the requirements of the applicable building code. This product is approved as described herein,and has been designed to comply with the High Velocity Hurricane Zone of the Florida Building Code. DESCRIPTION: 0.0356"(min.)Galvanized Steel Storm Panels Shutter APPROVAL DOCUMENT:Drawing No.96-20GA01,titled"Southeastern Metals Manufacturing Co.,Inc.20 Gauge Galvanized Storm Panel System",sheets 1 and 2 of 2,prepared by Southeastern Metals Manufacturing Co.,Inc.,dated October 17, 1997,last revision#2 dated October 10,2002 bearing the Miami-Dade County Product Control Revision stamp with the Notice of Acceptance number and expiration date by the Miami-Dade County Product Control Division. MISSILE IMPACT RATING: Large and Small Missile Impact LABELING:Each panel shall bear a permanent label with the manufacturer's name or logo,city,state and the following statement "Miami-Dade County Product Control Approved",unless otherwise noted herein. RENEWAL of this NOA shall be considered after a renewal application has been filed and there has been no change in the applicable building code negatively affecting the performance of this product. TERMINATION of this NOA will occur after the expiration date or if there has been a revision or change in the materials,use,and/or manufacture of the product or process.Misuse of this NOA as an endorsement of any product,for sales,advertising or any other purposes shall automatically terminate this NOA.Failure to comply with any section of this NOA shall be cause for termination and removal of NOA. ADVERTISEMENT: The NOA number preceded by the words Miami-Dade County, Florida,and followed by the expiration date may be displayed in advertising literature. If any portion of the NOA is displayed,then it shall be donein its entirety. INSPECTION:A copy of this entire NOA shall be provided to the user by the manufacturer or its distributors and shall be available for inspection at the job site at the request of the Building Official. This NOA revises&renews NOA#99-0318.03&consists of this page 1 &approval document mentioned above. The submitted documentation was reviewed by Helmy A.Makar,P.E. 1 ta i�1� NOA No 02-0809.02 Expiration Date: 10/10/2007 • Approval Date: 11/21/2002 Page 1 • �f!'tit• • HEADER CHANNEL LAYOUT �" :. 1 F I t3 eavewc 44'yu7 I/4 i QI.a t/is�.e t/r.tt.e T/a•T6 t/2t.a t/it. �6 yr vr� a/a' 1 J " f t I l r/�, 11 Y e ANCHORS • I 4 7lB Sli' ALL = _ ,,- a ..7 011e 1 J• ANCHORS �, dr SILL t,m•REF. [L-�-��_�� y 40 R [� r e • s 1 1 VI)2\ �..1 7/ty \-see P) as'SILL 10 maims to (T P) MP) { i A �+ t a'x s/t a star T +x ANCHORS I!r 1 ` 1 ®TYPICAL 20 GA GALVANIZED PANEL Al(„ ) —,.................. g 4 t T I '.Jaa• o s;i. Art St 'j's aJ'"°'m"° I. Illrr.;,::.� • '.«: jai 'I�1 Cr) tj is 1•11,T1 r/4'!n• fi. .•tt (�� .`aorsux earl "C 4se O Z1125. la �' 1111111 � r �r �T ,iblt....i. 1.710. IA.a W-r A CM%wM Cr V III ,..y. T 7A0o• --..` ""'° �1tom' Note: Reinforced pastels with atlteh boltL� ®$TUO ANGLE I, 7,oaD- artd spring nut at mFd—span eecuror rI .,at cacti lop pint with washared wing nut te�..a. — -.yip--4r.i1-06-mot I-we I'--xe• ®PATIO SILL DETAIL -7- 20 ALUMINUM HEADER CHANNEL DETAIL :.sa•-1 p--Is.oa•--{,--17m•--�.--u.00•-1 KO utxv c GENERAL NOTES "'sAr I + 1 7/1e'0 aa lu u tc �► --lr 4 asotI.e.ao•�e,3a={.aea'j.eao mot vim ,ri /. tEC 1.INS mono%M oOMIa N A0004DMK'11111 Tit PUMA MOM Cme,7001 CASON, a ANpraR3 / /�4 d.� L'caAla 7 A•O MCOIIMM M OCMw-MI M t MMO,(MOJCA MO OTI Mal.hi AlM/Ya N A-0a01eAwCl MN �•um-.1 H- -4-.. -4._ '---- -"I I,I�III� I [J/ T/•.+ Ala 7.N 1 Iltil O C A l lIS *J euaca A/O Oi•O.tif1CTWCr. 200• f I J.00' I A00' 17.00' 17.00' 1 MU PAWLS N.AU a 37 s A IMM.Pi•37 O(aept•')CamaIDfe ro MN *I tl 10171JK MAOC .N7M err h•771m1 . • . . . • • • . wuMM uUll+faqM ufl�ull K•Ot}7r.COX • ' ,l . 4.POI If10°LCI IMAIMMIS A11D,, M m t irraai.O De a nu hw.SIN MIL Ce(MC f.Awa i1 # # ¢ 4 4 # 1 I a.so• e.50• e.so• e.so• e.so• e.>a e.so• Sfi S4: IarefAtteN n tams MM rAcnM2 at.Ma. IS �+�N'4 7,,1,•1 DACE n-PIKOIIet OOITe NICI m t.ed-{1.-$3.Ca•-{.-IS.ad--}-17•ad•-- -17.00•—# .l7.aa•--{ Q .117Z e�•. v" I.70 for Ices-0A0[ampere'emc swam NACU Rom roar ears»o woo tam ea I I. • • • • • ' • I • • • • • • • • I.AALL qif M MAICCUICS Al T C JOINT.N M VNMM0 7TL f t A WOWS r •.0 u1 e.oe• e.5a' e.S0' e4a• Ise' e.J<1• e.Ja• 6Jo' e.Sd QA �- r•'r tits. 7.1u701u1 R[C•1CAe0ne IQICO.OWN AC M YM/AC9VK7•VI®ITATQI 0-uau ro F # •F di # # # # # •I _ ..... • St IMO II MOW IQM1a is ANCHORS "� .rMr .�r e IC MINIM IlapfON ALLY Ml11(MP rY StNA1112.TACHAOCC9 AS fUC Q70IW 1(RA$ NAIL WAY 4MQ H-13,0o•-4^13,00•-i•-17.Cer•---.1.3.07•+.-•I.--.•17.00.--+-•1s.00•-4 O.NV OVALS MO 11t41CAtge1 Mew.Natal 1st litho/SC c 1ro,4Crs *CUJI not ASAct. . . . • • . . . . . s . . . . 1 , ',Qi�AM7}t ALMS MIX NO Jerome MSC M M a"Garen M AaCaeMCf CM DAOC scum MOiacdj ee•SILL IM•d,CO.FC, IA 701.US Are NI • 017a VS AMID OII CV Tttl A7011I ma I.e.•A•+e.3o•+aso'+oacr+e.Ie•+e.so•+e3a•4 aso•+e.sd+e.s0•+e.so•{ iw mAfu,V wurAa'Oval LOAN SilCataW.Wxtte �/[' STUD ANGLE SILL LAYOUT rKODUCT REVISED POSITIVE - +55 ,t-,yy_MildoFi,w NEGATIVE — —71.5 ( 2 3 I 4 Ampere*&Mrs CNN. o2.0:d.•aZ ,.., I t I 4: ✓, /'• a:,A •t of 2 '`` ,yip `` J vt • ..la • _,_, •, • . • 1— • .ix..., , ___.„...,. .....,..„. . 1/4sr Op P*41 1444 — .. •. tel•ung ® :07:7,tri VI 1/4, Sinabs• 0 . . ...,,„„,-.....d Ail I ' . D, .rif—stati:.;.,,.__10-1°---1 . 1. .11 -N. 1 . ..,,I • ! ,.. r 4:1 ,10,,z......:4 ved 0.co,..... • , I' ® , 0 .0 Al 1 1.s1/4720 ib,,4 1 C.;it 0 ---..-.v._. Steel . . ...': . C*."-1'Me•sr 1/4•Ki• ' . 1 0 0 I 0 ° . SI4esoth e.14 •! 14 s,.., 16. 5" t 4 421.chit ler .; • •,_ st.. :., ., ... SiYIry Hui 414, 4, d I : .. rx1/41/20 . ,,..„,.. so- ...„.„,„.., I , . .ILI le . . ... . .........t .41 :-..., 1 ....I ,......, ......2 ,..„,...,.. . ,,,,,,,,,,,,aim • StruMgir/ . •I 1."147"8.14 A • i r:iddigill I Z 1 C4 14 ... la ..... / ) 11 0 Cofk-h Mega [i I ti tilt 4, . .1 111____ . -. s.Nt .1.---y--,_I ....-b..A„...- . Lit____H g / ."11-14u8Lux'fr..clfsa-Kautizatsxml ma.E..r.,.„ Etwa..m..., Z tacts.-To_raunratt.0 0 12412--t-Z310DELLAtusuctagit. szxaLatcaLLze joicazt idlii. MIER 'F......,,,-• _dim reromfa9 F--""--"—Ai „II ale, 4:7 ger, :: :1,..,.-.-.., A, e.1 . e ,. , _.....2-.. UST , An /10 I/4••wood lei, 1 fqr----- ''''Ma.nt r---- .. .. . . e...my • SOZ11407 lItitgui ... 4:zugu ,I IN,Ilhemar fil"ra . i dell 0 1 .70 Cf•th a 44 Vetoes *a i IP"ohanhhh."" / ....."` V. • . /Of/0as Stool 4gh ehl• . OM Sang Mut ging c.tleit . ail . 1.15iemr: 0%,0/Vor S'APP Itili NMI J framn. ii tMi1i11k 4a'141%.4 11 e1.I1l._______ /6v2,m00 0,el.4iu9.0/I2sVi0m IN1,i6 I„/u,4t .t •... F%rboomol u'uua . __4n wi1i'1.2t 0" 1uTI ftroro:.0VuMp0tN e1rtt1m 1/1u.L1l.11.r oL.'r0111"111:6 ", w4 2r rI2r LtE1,WiVaLE1-i1llRl1ei11iIlC:l1M141m11N3iillg12oam,k; •Z---- a, e 2..,,,c,..Alum.tubs or rur P.t ISueet hr Slut/framing•111-at. Swiss•24e Z...77 *.oliii3 p...t,..16", ,,e&fa 0 &roe P.?.Weed Slusi 6,efalf,of Slud. 40,4...___,VP iiii ib" F,11,M,04,,L,eggy Frot•wt•24'•,, • r acrimer Romp I ..,,, „,. '•' T isatio_wau_oraa rzrar-ra_mai_cam. .r.ls_DVA4.UM'et Usti) 4440/K ram• , Pr MP Oft 60110A1 Or&Amu MUD hug ACOMMAItt kg 0 Z..0' • •. •07. ,1 You.....mmix_szawujiman PA*1"1,40t-7 imen .„, 4.1;•••-:!!,1 . ... '.... Mt i otod.4 . ..,, . . ...., .1.. 5 ..,_ . . '': Zt.'• ,.• ,......., .,,,,..,,,..-.. - -., . '4;• Ts,- • , ....„. . ..,, . , ... . . • . ..,..4 ..., • . . ..' _ _ • !...-....____. „::_• _ _-...--'.:::'..."1 . . --- - ..• : .. -\--;,',.--,- .:.-.1 . . - , .., • ---'.'7, 1 . • _ • ' lilt' • 2(,7':.4..--",----I1 'a - ::', ..._ , .1 ..\::1•.;.1',:;:>---1 , . t,--:--1-:, -1 1. \' --- 1 .... .,... . . . , . ..... . • - • 111' •''' .''-,- -.,.:;',-..#.--,:-4-..--'.----''''--'-.`=:.':--:::-1'..'..,`,,,'. . .,-'''' , .. . . .. , , .. " ... ' ., ei-- ' ..."Nit''k'.. -:41 ' ,,,--:.-.: .''• ".... ' . L. swi • , •‘"--• 41 _, .,-,,:-..-4.•,.,. .. -.••••• _ _.,•,....„ , -.• :,---,...;:••-c..-41---•.4.---:•,., , -..-_2 -•4.---,,„,..v.I• .;.,.:,-,, VT'l!..-;-% • • - :-,-,' - _,:_.•••,,,..••••: •-_--,:i --„- „.--,-•-•- -- -.----....•. :-,-;.•,-.::- _ .„ . .. ... ,__..._ .. . ••• - •• , :, ..-• i...., ....__ _ - :. - _•• : •-•_:•,-... - „-_,...-:•-,16............,..-4,,,,, _ __•..i, .cf, •; P--,..--.,--.:--, ,0, ,.:- -..-,-..,__•;•:.- -I -,•:..,-:;:.. - :-..-,.er-q-kr,,,.,,,,-*•z,11-,..f,-,--;-,'. .-. • ,.i. k,..-.., ..•, , :i :.:5.-- ..,..f.--..,14-.'....-..-,.:: ',i..-:;;-';;:, 1 ._ ........„....., -,..„,----- ftt ..i-09.:'...... .`i.. .•%;.X.,...1fl.t:;;;',2:7,,,,. ..:,,,,,,,..., ,...,....„, . .'• ,i/'' s , -, - • -- ... . • • • I3LLHAY6[ACH DLLRAY OUCH HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD rar , 11111!- MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT IflJ. 1993 1995 001 -001 Agent: Kupi & Eliopoulos Architects, P.A. Project Name: 101 Dixie Boulevard Project Location: 101 Dixie Boulevard ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is consideration of a COA request for the replacement of a damaged cedar shake roof with a metal roof on a contributing dwelling, and the replacement of an asphalt shingle roof with a metal roof to the dwelling's associated guest cottage, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND/PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject property consists of the northeast 25' of Lots 18 & 19, and the west % of Lot 20, Block 4, Del-Ida Park, and is located on the northwest side of Dixie Boulevard between Swinton Avenue and NE 2nd Avenue. The property contains a contributing 2,212 sq.ft., one story Frame Vernacular style dwelling constructed in 1939, and a 1,030 sq.ft., one story guest cottage to the rear constructed in 1950. The property is located within the Del-Ida Park Historic District, is zoned R-1-AA (Single Family Residential) and is currently in use as a residence. There have been no recent Board or administrative actions pertaining to this property. Project Description The proposed project consists of the replacement of the dwelling's damaged cedar shake roof and the guest cottage's asphalt shingles with a 5V-crimp metal roof with mill finish. While re-roofing utilizing similar materials associated with repair or replacement is typically reviewed and approved administratively, the replacement of a roof with new materials requires Board approval. ANALYSIS Development Standards LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(a, b, g, h) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or Meeting Date:January 5,2005 Agenda Item: II.C. 101 Dixie Boulevard-Roof material change from cedar shake to metal Page 2 addition of exterior architectural features. The applicable standards are as follows: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(8) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: (a) height, (b) front fagade proportion, (g) consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color, and(h) roof shapes with the predominant designs and materials used being visually compatible with the surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district. The Delray Beach Design Guidelines state the following with respect to roofs: Preserve the roof's shapes, decorative features, and materials, as well as its patterning, color, and size. Stripping the roof of its historic material, i.e. slate, clay tile, wood, or architectural metal is inappropriate. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation suggest the following: The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Analysis The proposed project consists of the replacement of the dwelling's damaged cedar shake roof and the guest cottage's asphalt shingles with metal roofing with a mill finish. The metal roofing will not be visually compatible with the dwelling and the proposed replacement is not within the standards as directed by the LDRs, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines or the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. The cedar shakes and asphalt shingles appear to be the original roof coverings of the dwelling and guest cottage respectively and the stripping of historic roofing materials is deemed to be inappropriate. The historic fabric should be retained where possible; however, where the severity of deterioration requires replacement, the new feature should match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. The proposed metal roofing does not match any of the above requirements; however, the treatment is reversible, the life span of a metal roof will exceed that of a shingle roof, and the mill finish color will not dominate the structures. 101 Dixie Boulevard-Roof material change from cedar shake to metal 4 Page 3 A number of other properties in close proximity have recently replaced their roofs with metal roofs. On July 16, 2003, the Board approved the conversion of the nearby non- contributing, one story duplex to an office at 230-232 Palm Court which included replacing the asphalt shingles with a standing seam "gavelum" roof with a mill finish and, on December 15, 2004, Board approval was given for the replacement of the cedar shake roof with metal roofing on the non-contributing property at 799 NE 2nd Avenue on the condition that the color was either gray or white. However, in each of these examples the structures were non-contributing. Replacement of this type for contributing structures clearly is inconsistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation as well as the Delray Beach Design Guidelines therefore positive findings cannot be made with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(a, b, g, h), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the COA for 101 Dixie Boulevard, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(J), 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8) (a), (b), (g) and (h) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. C. Move denial of the COA for 101 Dixie Boulevard, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(J), 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8) (a), (b), (g) and (h) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. RECOMMENDATION Move denial of the COA for 101 Dixie Boulevard, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(J), 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8) (a), (b), (g) and (h) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Report Prepared by:Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner Attachments: Photograph k. T4,1 "u ,- +. �y7 'g�,t•41j t`q"f y, `... „�-a''.� �4 t ;,� 7 ': iNt` • ► . At, s wr .Jr'�'7 y,s /'+ '•. .1, i err 'ems • r d� •�; r3 >..,-.S '',� R 2~ y�r�i "j f //� w N ,l rr , ��1. r „. �+ a. ,•! .� a ayypy►-F_�'y2a •l• 't�►�i`•.'�<1`W' _ ._.,^iip�•, ,• .1 ; tr;' '.' - y Yr �� r ��rr 1p'l �'�J•. 1 /r' F .-1� i .4 t r �.r'.. "'• ,---• . • Tk} .• ... •'q'R '7 ' .d'r.1' .:r'7 r / / ,, { ,�• R i f � / ->;{ I, �y I ,,4 j<' 4 .'k 7'Tr. • � • w i »♦ .:. Y aF Y' 'ta'':!''�J �x l�f ", r:. /r ,,,c/ yf> 1 ,i 1t Ia.: `{ �e '+ft ;' k.-•`".'•r' ', ¢s.1 a• • .�� t■'^ 3, T .:^� Y c•4. i.•.a111 r 7 _ ''t r �`i .,1 " q A• , �.' (r/ •i� AZ", ,fi r � � E. • ± a q i i9Jl�n t •r3c' Ewa .d � ti iyy„ '.', <f� R`C t Zia+-. r ,�b. f Y 1 -%'-:j I�; k• ( 41, / ( ZVI > J er a y, ..: •i,, '. p ,;':- '[�'R,SSAtie ,'s e.� y • , . �.Md ( f5 '1 IYi' l:. 1 IN' I /1.+� >' lid 1 ..11�r P „x "'a:' `•C 44 4 _ , - q (/ffy'I 1 r r I +' /�: J• i Z '� .F 1_ \_�,a '�'i „r,.• � � y ,Ni ♦ �J� /f. � �r X.•• ,� �,�1 / 7`,'„?'' it t K-.. r ..i vY ! �, °x'�qq � .■t..v ,♦ } ,' ^'Y ' ...4.'• J ti d�k'. /,11.. ( r �, a d.,y �P .x j S . Yti rM+�• frY� ..,.,....„_,...,:fir. . ;/ x,. �• r'! ` [*�, ^ ) v`'� N fir .de ^/,}r' .•�f r ' 'r r ..e�• x' is } �7+, -X. t.,{�. I #r•am' ,&'",i rt' .. ,tr'�• .. ••' '�+r,'+� •�.�(. E � • y ,4': - -.,- , O rr' A :, � �k ''. 'soli4`t •:R ti I:jL re Si,��M,.� ff. �� it ( fr +ryr .r. ,rz, r Arr :tr.: • Y .v , I .(�y y - . • yw,.w �.i x ' •S .r ♦• - "r�,o• 4,,,...',. !q• ,x�u'#,tip� f., rl .t r 't.,y.+:r l , S. r [S 4 1 r �', ''A:+•�rT R"•"„ . (R, •• a /,, r ^•-."t'• S' r ,#:, .,; _.C �;:?j^^ �,. .,J,. p. s d,1t�„v �{'Y. :, 4i'.�P., i;.e �f,` '` , +: ., ..,4 ' . j 4,-'1'11, 'f(11- 1, .. .y+ rr:.,.. ,—,wr " #= 9� �� l�Ss ,"4 : ' k #".,' N" '•t`ri,. x ti ..�)y, (1/^.i1 •r k Y'1 , F, . . •..i .,� _T -. F'w a {; , • • t.•..5 .$• r' .•i ...y.,. A :tqq�, ,... i..:,` '•ri .•:z ,} ..,. �G ps•-:{/ t .,�. �.' ....7i t.14:e.., -:-4f .. ;+:. - 1.>1R :8 .. " ,, S 3 •� 14�' s''yti.J: jx, 11/r' r `1' ,k;� '�' l,' �'I;P'Jl.� •�I i. 4-,1 \} ". q J , •r '� ,.'f.s'•,. ! ,. '� ,'•+�S•'Artt '4'pP�'! ,t� V.i ',�'.. •� ^ic,` `,`r /rr 2-4 �.; :rfr.; "•�✓ t -., Zr .,s.S:. ,r. Y•:" 1, ,'S -..,1-• .w R{., •i. ; i ,•,.•!s.: Yr„'tx"#R'+; •i ," ., :,, " 't: t^ • :' / :'�3dJ '.- s,. ' `. "'' � , • A '",�s..4...ri4 �� , •`�••;u} r �• -s.-.S -1.•'r' ,.'.. �i•! s '�-. - .'sr.t ,I,..' '+ r t. ,�i j- .. 1: +p .iy 4:h , r a .` . A, tazt. :.r?i.,Rz,t-' s 'J^ h,' �0 r�,.,.,„, o r -,t•r,{ �c ', s - i , _.. y 1 A 1.. r :' t x q'�, ` •, rr i �'.1,1: y J , •t ''t`� y' f 1i J w� x,f `t a�S+'3. t'Y4.•Jh r ',jter g . ` +f f.jr ;� � %n +t vi ,'. 'o E .",' `7"' .4„ • a�,12 ^i, //4.: 1 '7 elf •+r y I'`. . 9 .4 ..n•1,�r a,..at�,tiw,� .• Sx� fi �. T 's z •n.w yw til . rD'A t+' ,,-4 i a . Z .� "�"' 4! .4 �. .r "• irrs:Say-ve,so..�e..r r♦'►' 4 .-'^-•. ., 4r'"' q` • •4 ° • ,�y�d�r r -`'�• .,,, it'.J/ ' r � f r.`so.P1 r .t++;.�,yw n • w e "" r r iltti • j Ii tI , ' r _IF rx �} rl '41' ,,; •...,J q� 1 a RLm)i 3C 4 '-• ... "f, .' , .r47.,. ar!'r., .. • • • "II'r 1.-,,.f ) u: • '(rt tom/•f'�r ° m�. .a^,,i°'•`j,, <Fx•" S t sn t ',,,,,,44,.v. gf 'RYr: r 9w''.W'a,Et�`" "' r..,� t* 'j!F ,•, 1 • 'ri i J ' 3a l �'u4S n.: .a:ir . ♦ �.,,R. :rR:. ° J , aY .P ♦ .'♦p{�R.. y"Y ..' '�.,NC„ .t^4G•� :�t. G `i,. •M .4 Y s j 6 1! Ai. f• -'',,! J 4. i'T;J•.,, 9- :,rPk 'iP M1 7^rw .? R. .I ;' ..4 n- � u.;. "'! �, x" ,A�.rr 'r y.. a, .. ''•'P`� - �.;tf'� �,1yry !�y '".X�.rku=t ;t rt >,�.y; lr `fw� r R � „ • •4x5"i- vu'i �+ + 'M-.�:e6•,. F ;. ,',J'' i ,,, , ,#C .,p _J xt,. ��.rl ,r... �-�, ..,.+ -,v..,s` a r:..�+ r w K r y 1. . }C 4 4. � w" . •.'• .r.''.!<.. ..".Y�.,i v ,r;^,;'x4•� kyn.,.. rs '.i .. ' 1': , • { {. y,: t..r a 0.�;�'� P,,." ^ . ,. ,.., 'Y . •...r,,.nti + '+X r �d�,��ia ,r "2C d '' �S ,...,^: , ,:.r `T' A.. :rMt+wr'�J"' ill .t;,i ,I .�, .',,,,',,,,,,,4`,..,, . ,r ',. t jS,.yrh,;. +. z!.a<.. n •f t 4a'- .;- rao ..'!N 'lr. y t ek+� J;1 o.Y;31tr'i ,�r�+,•� ��"� ^"' .++ J�r . .:. 'I.^" �- ",.y �'"�kllr •"'id� tr.,,,. s.�'. c _ " 'r» 'i4J,r;'',"�'. :,"�rtf ,y^,;', war'P' 1 a 'LT'? '''''' - ..n, --:_::;•--.----- - - - n.l"s' ,w 4 w•.C� J' j'• v • r. •."' rt „ '"'wti.n 1 L ..+f' _ rr �+, - ,.:.»,7 r q , Y 4. 'r Z` ,aMt `�.. t ;`,Ak� �r,:,,. + �:,pa{ ,�»�k3h,' ^�`*...'�• - "::, i'�"as ... _ -, n" `" r. h n"»,•'J. �s''v�',^ w�, sfi, i I ,,E ''�- w k ,. .,,,a ", y'6S ,•yy, hjy �'W6...' :X^ .Y•i'.. .tw„w:{. ow +444—•i+;•` _- .", -•"'4,.-;- - �y �~ Y 'Cui.ma'?wd ,8 ..t& • 7•-1411* °,yF^ ;>!•SY. :'.i w tr �.+ r+- ,�..�r,' >m .,eta=- .n +,w+'. i, tti/ +' .wn is �' �Sa•.4` i �rF►n^' ,'uw, �.. - ,.i v u•k... ,w... �..,,+t,r..ar:.• ,. ^yet,.." � ��" 1,�u '" u • •;�, ;."'�'.,'.,.. .. .x�'tV....•�>3.; .,..'.,ir.....4�i� ;!:'.x.'''yY9.,. `,_�-:,�'31•5� .._■..^�.- U.W♦.*a.. w as Y.a:.�•±'!^' '�o-'..'.`ta."_'''�Y,wM>w� :fi.t,•�vr t,;,•�.r L.. ',... ,.� „ , cr1,�.r :•d f :s r ' ta �r•� �' �F ca :I " ¢d-4dfl1 � � }a-+ 4r - s , • • • • .::j.:qr �, '? � a y !' Rrr�u�4•'�. Vi a'.. «,!" ' r.m> .5`A R,ok,„ W,y s •5ttK...k.,',-.ts+. axr . �;io✓•• ;,4r yr,9 ; s , .v.y: t n •::I u.vtiuNP•-•"t: , '' •„4 t.43 =' " ? e s 6 � ,,:Irf' �r, k;r t' ' t'y'•.x,� t+z . x � ;4r �� 7 z.t.s. ,• • , - '4wf7 ' ..;y ' k @yE ,.• to r..: �t � M;; , r Y �f' :h v, ) •ten 'yr✓" *" -, Y ;� RCUR Jf ?.^ - i n ! S •. N f 'r�'� . .r°r .AJ �""u F,aa^• r ih : 1f - `?, T51 . t, ''?. « •) ,h Vr'' 'f° '� *.•'-' y :ry ,°`" r 4qN , ,t, r3a•: �^ , : "„ ti'` i a.d,`:�1i �t ,�t -.. � t?}K .`>. ..a.. -';r- 1;' M i,, � • ,t �•,ti ��_� ,.{x 4V,':-4 r �4 .h` �;• ' ,Xy i . 0 '� ¢g^,,. : 1E2 .r' . .,.', dr. .,,.ti f 3,ye� .v :, s-, : ..> t .gr,,�, 6i' � . ^ .�yir. k _,�` i a;trNyr „r '� (Y / r 4 -'' +.: `:n,,„4. , l c t.t„: ¢ ; c ' I '' p'ei_ " ?- ' ?•,,w. �3 °'J' .1,"w .4. - .te . a:. ' Af 1 •,. , • ,n4 ) , as. ,. y,, . ,4 , , . „, - , ,f,,A-ivTr �:• `R` "a ' -'`.iw . y'p� ' 'd ,. .. V t-? ` N , ` 1.. e4• . .i,'y t la F , a i Yr:�La."sk..r1c . .A .I.'j7: l " " ; ,. : i7 • ..�.; • • •i. DELRAY BEACH F L 1993 AII-America City 2001 SIGN IN SHEET 2001 Regular Historic Preservation Board Meeting SPECIAL MEETING January 12, 2005 PRINT FULL NAME ADDRESS OR ITEM NO. ORGANIZATION (A) q 9 n F. a . _ff:%. tol pax t 1 a e CITY OF DELRAY BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD In Re: Mako Technologies 145 North Swinton Avenue FINAL ORDER Following a consideration of the evidence and testimony presented, the Historic Preservation Board for the City of Delray Beach finds as follows: 1) That the Petitioner requested that the Historic Preservation Board (HPB) approve a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) allowing the demolition of the buildings located at 145 N. Swinton Avenue. 2) The buildings on the property are a contributing single-family dwelling and associated garage that were constructed in the 1939 Minimal Traditional style. Both buildings are in good condition. These buildings are highly visible and demolition of these contributing buildings shall erode the fabric of the historic district. It is in the public interest to preserve these buildings. 3) We hereby find that this demolition of these historic contributing buildings will have a detrimental and adverse affect on the streetscape and will cause the streetscape to be forever changed so that the integrity of the historic district is in jeopardy. 4) The reason that the citizens of the City of Delray Beach supported the passage of the Historic Preservation Ordinance and district was because they determined it was in the public interest to maintain the charm and style that these buildings preserve for all residents of the City. 5) We find it is against the public interest to approve a COA for demolition of these historic contributing buildings. 6) Furthermore, the Petitioner failed to present any evidence, financial hardship or otherwise, in supporting a request for the demolition of the buildings. For the above stated reasons, the Certificate of Appropriateness regarding the de blition of the buildings is DENIED this (54h day of Deg. 6pv— , 200# ,`J Chair Historic Preservation Board copies to: Jeffrey Silberstein `�,1 _PA AGENDA HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING q CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Meeting Date: Jan ary 5, 2005 C Type of Meeting: Reg ar Meeting Location: First F1Qor Conference Room '� v Time: 6:00 P. . c-. L The City shall furnish appropriate a iliary aids and services where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to p rticipate in and enjoy the benefits of a service, program, or activity conducted by the City. Please contac Doug Randolph at 243-7127(voice), or 243-7199(TDD), 24 hours prior to the program or activity in order for t e City to reasonably accommodate your request. Adaptive listening devices are available for meetings in the ommission Chambers. If a person decides to appeal any clecisiq n made by the HistoricPreservation Board with respect to any matter considered at this meeting or hears , such persons will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such persons may need to e ure that a.verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Such record includes the testimony and evidence on which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide or prepare such record. Two or more City Co missioners maybe in attendance. I. CALL TO ORDER II. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIAT ESS A. 799 NE 2nd Avenue, Del-Ida P rk Historic District, William Domeyer, Owner Reconsideration of a Certificate of Appr riateness associated with the removal of wood shakes from a roof and their replaceme t with metal roofing on an existing commercial building. B. 133 NW 5th Avenue, West Settlers istoric District, William Bowden, Owner Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriate ess for the installation of storm protection on a non-contributing residence. III. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. 238 NE 5th Terrace, Del-Ida Park Hist ric District, Tullia Taylor, Owner Proposal for the development/demolition of an exis ng residential duplex building. IV. REPORTS AND COMMENTS A. Public Comments B. Reports from Historic District Representatives C. Board Members D. Staff IV. ADJOURN WD,i Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner POSTED ON: December 30,2004 UEUUYCA BCH UELRAY BEACH HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD D � IVIEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT �II� 1')93 1 2001 200199• Agent: W.E. Brodbeck Roofing Project Name: 799 NE 2nd Avenue Project Location: 799 NE 2nd Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is reconsideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness request for the replacement of a wood shake roof with a "regal blue" metal roof on a non- contributing dwelling, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND/PROJECT DESCRIPTION During its meeting of December 15, 2004, the Board approved the replacement of the wood shakes with a Sem-Lok standing seam panel metal roof subject to the following condition: That the proposed color of the metal be chromatic with a choice of the following Sem-Lok roofing colors in keeping with the architecture of the subject property: Slate Gray, Onyx Gray, and Colonial White. The applicant, who was unable to attend the December 15 meeting, is now before the Board for reconsideration of this finding as he does not wish to use any of the three specified colors. Additional background information is provided in the HPB staff report of December 15, 2004. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the COA as conditioned on December 15, 2004 for 799 NE 2nd Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(J), 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8) (a), (b), (g) and (h) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Meeting Date:January 5,2005 Agenda Item:II.A. 799 NE 2nd Avenue-Reconsideration of roof material change from cedar shake to metal Page 2 C. Move denial of the COA as conditioned on December 15, 2004 for 799 NE 2"d Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(J), 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8) (a), (b), (g) and (h) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. RECOMMENDATION: : Move approval of the COA as conditioned on December 15, 2004 for 799 NE 2"d Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(J), 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8) (a), (b), (g) and (h) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Report Prepared by:Warren Adams,Historic Preservation Planner Attachments: HPB Staff Report 12.15.04 OUBAYMACH �' HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD "�' II MEMORAN U STAFF2EPOR 1993 Agent: W.E. Brodbeck Roofing Project Name: 799 NE 2nd Avenue Project Location: 799 NE 2nd Avenue MB ITE . . .... EFORE THE BOARD ` The item before the Board is consideration of a COA request for the replacement of a wood shake roof with a metal roof on a non-contributing dwelling, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUNDIPRUJECT DESRIPTIOIV The property consists of Lots 1 & 2, Block 12, Del-Ida Park and is situated between NE 2nd Avenue, Palm Court and George Bush Boulevard. The structure is a 2,000 sq.ft. Ranch style structure constructed in 1950 and is considered a non-contributing;dwelling within the Del-Ida Park Historic District. The property is zoned RO (Residential Office) and is currently in use as an orthodontics office. In June 1985, a request was submitted to remodel the building by replacing the existing cement tiles with cedar shakes, and applying rough-cut cedar to the fascia, overhangs, and stucco walls. By May 1988 the roof alterations had been completed and a COA request was submitted to change the application to the walls from rough-cut to 1" x 6" tongue and groove cedar, which was subsequently installed. Project Description The proposed project consists of the replacement of the wood shakes with a "regal blue" Sem-Lok standing seam panel metal roof. According to the,contractor, the current roof covering is defective and replacing it with similar wood shakes would result in these defects occurring again in_the-near future whereas the metal covering wilt have a longer -life span. While re-roofing, either repairs or replacement, is typically reviewed and approved administratively, replacement of a roof with new materials as well as a color change require Board approval. Meeting Date: December 15,2004 Agenda Item: IH.A. 799 NE 2nd Avenue-Roof ma 'l change from cedar shake to metal • Page 2 • ANALYSIS t MY ri a.� �� : II X s �3 �.�^3-�s< -rS �:«"3'ks' A�+J .Y ...r�4 Development Standards LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(a, b, g, h) "Development Standards" provides • guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The applicable standards are as follows: (E)(4) A historic site, or building, structure, site, improvement, or appurtenance within a historic district shall be altered, restored, preserved, repaired, relocated, demolished, or otherwise changed in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, as amended from time to time. (E)(8) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a • designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: (a) height, (b) front façade proportion, (q) consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color, and(h)roof shapes with the predominant designs and materials used being visually compatible with the surrounding-historic-sites and structures within the historic district.- - The Delray Beach Design Guidelines state the following with respect'to-roofs: lilt Preserve the roof's shapes, decorative features, and materials, as well as its patterning, . color, and size. Stripping the roof of its historic material, i.e. slate, clay tile, wood, or architectural metal is inappropriate. The Secretary-of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation suggest the following: • The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. -The- removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the. new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. _ _ . . __ Analysis The proposed project is the replacement of a wood shake roof with a "regal blue" Sem- Lok standing seam panel metal roof. The building is non-contributing; however, it is situated on a prominent site at the primary entrance to the Del-Ida Park area and any alteration should be sensitive to the building's architectural style and features and the area's historic character_ The proposed roof will not be visually compatible with the dwelling and the proposed replacement is not in-kind as directed by the Delray Beach Design Guidelines or the 799 NE 2"d Avenue-Roof material ige from cedar shake to metal Page 3 Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. However, consideration must be given to the facts that the wood shakes are not the original roof covering, the treatment is reversible,_and the life span of a metal roof will exceed that of a shingle roof. Also, while this is a-non-contributing Ranch style structure in a predominantly Mediterranean Revival style:area, a number of other properties in close proximity have replacement metal roofs. On July 16, 2003, the Board approved the conversion of the nearby non- contributing,' one story duplex to an office at 230-232 Palm Court which included replacing the asphalt shingles With'a standing seam "gavelum". roof. In this case, the proposed roof is "regal blue" in color and the building is currently-painted white. The color of the roof will make it stand out and dominate the structure, therefore, if the Board considers the metal roof, the color should be changed to a less dominant color such as that of a "mill finish". Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to LDR_Sections 4.5.1(E)(4) and (E)(8)(a, b, g,-h), the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the COA for 799 NE.2"d Avenu e, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the.staff-report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.46(J), 4.5.1(E)(4),`and (E)(8) (a), (b), (g) and (h) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. C. Move denial of the COA for 799 NE 2"d Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(J), 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8) (a), (b), (g) and (h) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. - RECOMMENDATION: Move approval of the COA for 799 NE 2"d Avenue, by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff-report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Sections 2.4.6(J), 4.5.1(E)(4), and (E)(8) (a), (b), (g) and (h) of the Land Development Regulations, the Delray Beach Design Guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, subject to the following condition: 1) That the proposed color of the metal be changed to a mill finish or a less dominant color more in keeping with the architecture of the subject property and the Del-Ida Park Historic District. Report Prepared by:Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner Attachments:Roof specification, photographs r f t 1. ti / s, } i\ bt ill" • -,� • k� '`�' s4tf•`• , t tv jM b R3R. f_, t\� ",<f '.3' 'f" . 54 ``... - tom•• ��'t `�'; Z -, i ice ` - S - : [ i. ,--.-;..•,-,••,,,t•:••f SL,. ( f t N1 +Yj ` 1 , ;III i i t �' . .A;,-;..1. _ • s artb,,.rs t14 1 DEHLIYUEACH DELRAY BEACH �All-AmericaGry AIFAm tei d HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT glIP,. I Jti i 1993 Agent: Michael Bowden Project Name: BTW Inc. Location: 133 NW 5th Avenue ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the installation of storm protection on a non-contributing residence at 133 NW 5th Avenue, pursuant to LDR Section 2.4.6(J). BACKGROUND/PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject property is situated on the east side of NW 5th Avenue between NW 1st Street and Martin Luther King Jr. Drive. The property was built in 1959, is of CBS construction and consists of 10 apartment units. It is considered a non-contributing building in the West Settlers Historic District and is currently zoned General Commercial (GC). There are no recent administrative or Board actions pertaining to this property. The current proposal involves the repair of Unit 7 which was recently damaged by fire. Although the majority of the repairs are internal, the applicant is replacing the windows (which have been approved administratively) and fitting them with storm panels, which requires Board approval. The storm panels consist of 20 Gauge galvanized steel panels that will attach to the dwelling via tracks or channels at the top of the opening and will be bolted directly to the building at the base. Panels will be installed on the approach of a storm and will be stored when not in use. ANALYSIS LDR Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) "Development Standards" provides guidelines in evaluating Certificates of Appropriateness for the alteration or addition of exterior architectural features. The guidelines are as follows: The Board Shall Consider: (E)(8)(g) All improvement to buildings, structures, and appurtenances within a designated historic district shall be visually compatible. Visual compatibility can include but is not limited to: consistency in relation to materials, texture, and color of the façade of a building in association with the predominant material used in surrounding historic sites and structures within the historic district. Meeting Date: January 5th,2005 Agenda Item: II.B. 133 NW 5th Avenue,Storm protection Page 2 4 Delray Beach Design Guidelines The following is a list of recommended treatments with respect to hurricane protection: • Window shutters that are removable are preferred. • If the tracks are to be installed year-round, they should be painted to match the exterior surface. Analysis The installation of the proposed removable storm panels can be supported as they are the least obtrusive form of storm protection. As the tracks require minimal hardware, there is little concern that the installation could irreparably damage the exterior of the building. However, in order to camouflage the tracks, a condition of approval has been added to paint the tracks to match the color of the building. The project, as proposed, can therefore be supported based upon positive findings with respect to LDR Sections 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, once the condition of approval to paint the tracks for the storm panels has been met. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Continue with direction. B. Move approval of the COA for 133 NW 5th Avenue by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) of the Land Development Regulations and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, subject to the condition. C. Deny approval of the COA for 133 NW 5th Avenue by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and does not meet criteria set forth in Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) of the Land Development Regulations and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines. RECOMMENDATION Move approval of the COA request for 133 NW 5th Avenue by adopting the findings of fact and law contained in the staff report, and finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets criteria set forth in Section 4.5.1(E)(8)(g) of the Land Development Regulations and the Delray Beach Design Guidelines, subject to the following condition: 1) That the tracks or channels are painted to match the exterior of the building. Attachments: Shutter Specs, Photographs Report Prepared by:Warren Adams, Historic Preservation Planner i M MKAADE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY,FLORIDA METRO-DADE FLAGLER BUILDING BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE OFFICE(BCCO) 140 WEST FLAGLER STREET,SUITE 1603 PRODUCT CONTROL DIVISION )riMI,FLORIDA 33130-1563 (305)375-2901 FAX(305)375-2908 NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE (NOA) Southeastern Metals Manufacturing Co.,Inc. 11801 Industry Drive Jacksonville,Florida 32218 SCOPE: • This NOA is being issued under the applicable rules and regulations governing the use of construction materials. The documentation submitted has been reviewed by Miami-Dade County Product Control Division and accepted by the Board of Rules and Appeals(BORA)to be used in Miami Dade County and other areas where allowed by the Authority Having Jurisdiction(AHJ). This NOA shall not be valid after the expiration date stated below. The Miami-Dade County Product Control Division (In Miami Dade County) and/or the AHD (in areas other than Miami Dade County)reserve the right to have this product or material tested for quality assurance purposes. If this product or material fails to perform in the accepted manner, the manufacturer will incur the expense of such testing and the AM may immediately revoke,modify,or suspend the use of such product or material within their jurisdiction. BORA reserves the right to revoke this acceptance,if it is determined by Miami-Dade County Product Control Division that this product or material fails to meet the requirements of the applicable building code. This product is approved as described herein,and has been designed to comply with the High Velocity Hurricane Zone of the Florida Building Code. DESCRIPTION: 0.0356"(min.)Galvanized Steel Storm Panels Shutter APPROVAL DOCUMENT:Drawing No.96-20GA01,titled"Southeastern Metals Manufacturing Co.,Inc.20 Gauge Galvanized Storm Panel System",sheets I and 2 of 2,prepared by Southeastern Metals Manufacturing Co.,Inc.,dated October 17, 1997,last revision#2 dated October 10,2002 bearing the Miami-Dade County Product Control Revision stamp with the Notice of Acceptance number and expiration date by the Miami-Dade County Product Control Division. MISSILE IMPACT RATING: Large and Small Missile Impact LABELING:Each panel shall bear a permanent label with the manufacturer's name or logo,city,state and the following statement "Miami-Dade County Product Control Approved",unless otherwise noted herein. RENEWAL of this NOA shall be considered after a renewal application has been filed and there has been no change in the applicable building code negatively affecting the performance of this product. TERMINATION of this NOA will occur after the expiration date or if there has been a revision or change in the materials,use,and/or manufacture of the product or process.Misuse of this NOA as an endorsement of any product,for sales,advertising or any other purposes shall automatically terminate this NOA.Failure to comply with any section of this NOA shall be cause for termination and removal of NOA. ADVERTISEMENT: The NOA number preceded by the words Miami-Dade County, Florida, and followed by the expiration date may be displayed in advertising literature. If any portion of the NOA is displayed,then it shall be donein its entirety. INSPECTION:A copy of this entire NOA shall be provided to the user by the manufacturer or its distributors and shall be available for inspection at the job site at the request of the Building Official. This NOA revises&renews NOA#99-0318.03&consists of this page 1 &approval document mentioned above. The submitted documentation was reviewed by Helmy A.Makar,P.E. rrrj NOA No 02-0809.02 Expiration Date: 10/10/2007 Approval Date: 11/21/2002 �1r1 Page 1 • • • HEADER CHANNEL LAYOUT f isms• i. 13r COVERAGE 44•SILL3 1/4•. 1.6 1/211.6 I/2'.. 1/2"TI 0 1/21.•e 1/21• ir-17/8' �4 0/6• - 9 t/4�-� Se SILL 4 0 ANCHORS - l �I ci V Q114-1 r • r -- - l a fl ANCHORStt t\/� 44d9• ._. l.m•ca. es• SU. .I �I d o �` I f > I 90 R Li , r u y r '• i ! Q 4Kitt') 1---1 7/6• `SAW MP/ 66• SILL 10 ANCHORS n r I I i >~ t Qi TYPICAL 20 GA GALVANIZED PANEL `,--7/(renc,ems/1®sun. • „" 1 t f t S j 0 4 T s/a Ctzt14G SILO -- T-Ia z.aoQ•ajs a+rol etuQ ur-y r iii XVI J j.111St., WOWS MI �I�, �. rr3ii / ill .125. j ! LT 4. I Mom~rim Rehlor•ced poach; w+lfi$ I[i ! 1L • and spring nut at midsecure 1 0- ... last IIII --- at cacti lop Joint with --L�-�•� -� 1-CAW--1 I•-a.• ®PATIO SILL DETAIL 2Q ALUMINUM HEADER CHANNEL DETAIL i50•-{ II---is.oce--{.--ia.oa•--f•--Iaoo•-i ,sx to `-- , GENERAL NOTES " 2- I, **SOH*a.•MUMS ml e[!OO N A00011DMKt limn/LOOM***Ha CCU Seel mnat a 1Np10AS /,.//4 d.� L POSTS MO.L/A,.t OCSOY n1m1At CIL:MAIIM%VOA et'wow).1 Aott lvAret t11M • LJ/ Tr/ Ala T•N v0AA1 PESOS LOOS rat IMAM MO OMR SmucUer. 2.00•-4 ,•--I s.0o•--•I.--13.ao•-{•--i3.00•-1.-Moo'-{ L EOM 1 J 4. r Arms S.WC l' •3 7 .0107N17 COe90A.O 10 ASIM J 4.0 J1 1$W 4/CO/CT 11411114 µWA L 140 3--4..I D.M S••s.L l • • • • • • • • • • . J `POI FOIL IMO IW.•[ A SS WIN S MUM ao a ra rMa VON w.Cl'ac Y.NWO I.e.so•¢e.so•¢6.so•¢e.»'¢aso••�.e.w•�.e.so•i .i-C. 5.� 8. fl4', p��y / lief/AMTOYf 14TAIS WwINACTAW0 M.Ms. 6 l2• YyC+.6iia.M1i411 AmA MC 1Y,M000CT cam.AMMOt.o-�I.--13.00•---¢-1100'-4--t .00•--{--u.co•--¢-/3.00•--{ Q ..'.'1ri1.`aT..MA.rr MM I.To It[T•Ktma-plot Mncu•e cast.femme Amos AIM tlool man MO woo Mt11 ee•S41 I• • • • • • . • 4 • • • • . At MT.m w1•ra11m AI HunlAr MotF e.so•¢e.so'¢Sao•¢eaQ'¢e.so•¢eaY¢e.so¢6so•j.s.s�� I AA ,r.S',M.^..: Aw•4. 6.ALL mat;M6 8AMOM OWL ICOMv.h20 CO StAMX16 OWL I.tS A MOMS I 1.11.MS PI01/4 1 MOM iQ11O11�1CA1 we T1t MMOSAC1 Mt1 Ri lTamu O<IMOALS 17 K7L 10 10 MmD10RS ~Y L•n••4•• .., I.«MINIM MIM 110eOSIMI 3ON NIT IFCIC0 IMAM 1 In•711U/ILNfaIQMi1001 AS nO0 Gti►OM1U'MAIL /MRi YAr Am•"I J•-IS.00•---¢--13.00•-.I.-•Ii.00'-..4--13.00•-¢--i1.00•-••I.--Ilan'--4 1.TS MASS MO SISCSW.A110d MOM•e71a11 PIPI t1011 M MCOUC1S/w ee=I011 Of ACT. hwc Aro ovum ITAlC MI shwa vPM"s eI AOOOOMKC Im war OC mummumIAoroA1 ee'SAL I • • • • • . . • • • • • • • • • • • • i '.Q16t tlfFfltA[U.e ovum PA In IS We IA Ale NI IQ a 7 /In I.a50•¢e.so•¢6.so•+0.s0•¢ease+.•. n.vC1aas w•¢63a•4 ado•}e.so•¢cur+e.so•4 91 wc.co.lC. C warm snaS4I110.smtm STUD ANGLE SILL LAYOUT tROWCTxcvisca POSITIVE a +55 e.ua` .amTy•ti�. NEGATIVE = -71.5 ( 1 I 2 I 3 4 I en e....tr.oLo:o .at i I I i 4:7✓ r,••'� 7 `" ::•;a 1 OF 2 IOI11111;• ::L�.a / J 1 115• . . . • - . -F. . .,...., ; .. 'Sltucturo -- ...,, . 7)." •. Wor Coo Po.of ihi. , .1.rr,&ft iv,ye ...., ® I ........d . , ---A,-- f ..4 "`" N, 11 oof 1 ,... '.4 0 L:.1,..h.o1/4 720 RoTIli .skt..ox • 111 r 4:.,y,:z,, -1,- . D e 0 , . IA I WA 14' eur.t. 0 I. ® Cols,Mot o/ ..-..-in I . it_c.ponoloo md.,.. iri----- ill ..,. 1 1 „ ....1: ,,.., or.. 1 0 ,p,....,..,, a 54 Sid.n4&A,. t ....Z.4 ....z..11,q 0 SIN1 g orxr l • sPoroNul 71 adt • .: . Stall . ....:: sm,..,, 4 co : I no/47:o , II 1/1 •. t.) ,. Nu Hood S011 .11.5 li :SEr/VW• '.. is 4 ,.,,../....71 ., . lt____ VOW S4doodk ell Ii ‘=1.11,.. J 4i ...„, , l. ,,.....,. Skim*edit _..... , tiea2 i 4•T *Moog to./.4 P000,ili nil —I, I SltvrIlo...-1.. . 1 oli4720 Roe/ oloth,,,t,• I 0 . Codk-h And,„ it _. 2t6U-1681bELSEralQVPS13"1-14291LIY-SIERI Atat.17-nualttAL utita-nuticalum ;'. 1— — ° luclail-211.2221e124matut•—.s sxual 0 titmuo.„Au_mmt. eetcua,„,,,u v. , RAW AP,OOP frorok9 f ine. a. .c." t.SIU12fjf.L6UC4LLU2P7.4f:,"PrtlidjlatiliLardDti rp- t eta 0 0 MOIOR ^. .GI...7 .... . ttil MOM tat 1/4•4 trot.L.; . ie.• .Mk WIJO ell ..,E,,,,,t1(7.0...... PitAr.r4 .:-Ij I' I 411111.,111,1:- ,---__ . . *oft ....... . t Aga 0 1 0 it..!e 1/,'•am 1..4 WM =sc.jolorart #4.1ka / ....... V. . Ziir •. • .... ..., ,....,• • . ...,.., 444 Skf000lo Soil KU 11: it,r.tetr okyxotz" .... ..:.,..,,ra.,....4 . • ... , air, ;1.,.........,j,„E„,,, ,ifm, rA, ,3,,........... • It) Nal, . . ....T .., is) pi,4,,,aitsittsdkaulo.,. ,.... 7,, Trsrict w 1 411 no/e/20,,,,,„d b...1,9 vr.ve . ik.od -,:11101 Pa.. /20 goo NW lloitl . froon‘,4 a. ,LIL___Imammia 1‘1 Ill un.. ..7--4Arc: .0, , ...weir MOP.CKT: fromin tita fit_ ...,...., r„,,,,,,,.,„... , . 0....) ...,,...c........ ......"4A.6 RP pr p.c. II 'rorjUeltir,'....,""" "Iiiii=Oraia, :L.. IC „.., . 2 Vet 4•-• ....-ie.1.4.04 0.00:. Sef fit 0„VI LII °=4Z1613 CD 6lorl fromlno•ft'o.t &roe P.T.Wood MA oil 3/4•Po:ottotM" .b,:41.V'"IA-W." fry Cooler of Sluath'n -f,........ ._,,o•l'or"*.y ,,,%:.:•.:rt •:-••••.....,....741L...... .. .. , Fronk.•24.o.e :'•i:"11.61.45.v.,/er,: U I/4 LP) .e , .kAlt PRODUCT REMIT) ''TV.U'AX1,,L 9,Atv PRELIn_AtiaLatia IlnatMt Par WM - •142 MAO.MAT et Info 1.1.460.okriznio "CR.**Iola filellSirjjo AT TOP OR ROTTOLI tt P "Oat Cede Aolittiett P43 0 Z-0;,•,0 t ,.., IMLL1411t1I-SECnatLalcarm Wadi!. ,.. 40.54r•117,1 Do 7 11:=1 ',.. .04.1 TAP' i .......•i .--,L ilatnanZ Of 2 ., .. MR 1 D444. . ..,, FiriMI 'N., • ... „„,. • • • _ Imo. . •. _ - a :. . . - II —a--illif,./g11-rig.,,,-eAt...1,11-,.>•„!-,- :ft.,.g r, t,•• , R is . _ 4 •