Loading...
12-01-98 DECEMBER 1, 1998 A Regular Meeting of the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, was called to order by Mayor Jay Alperin in the Commission Chambers at City Hall at 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, December 1, 1998. !? Roll call showed: Present - Commissioner Ken Ellingsworth Commissioner David Randolph Commissioner David Schmidt Mayor Jay Alperin Absent - None Also present were - City Manager David T. Harden and City Attorney Susan A. Ruby 2. The opening prayer was delivered by Father Fiore with Emmanuel Catholic Church. 2.A. The Pledge of Allegiance to the flag of the United States of America was given. 3. APPOINTMENT TO THE CITY COMMISSION/SEAT #2: Formally appoint Patricia Langley Archer to the Delray Beach City Commis- sion (Seat #2) for an unexpired term ending March 25, 1999. Mr. Schmidt moved to appoint Patricia Langley Archer to the Delray Beach City Commission (Seat %2) for the unexpired term ending March 25, 1999, seconded by Mr. Ellingsworth. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mr. Schmidt - Yes; Mr. Ellingsworth - Yes; Mr. Randolph - No; Mayor Alperin - Yes. Said motion passed with a 3 to 1 vote. 3.A. Administer Oath of Office to Patricia Langley Archer. The City Clerk administered the oath of office to Patricia Langley Archer. Mrs. Archer, having been duly sworn, took her seat on the dais. 3.B. Roll Call. Roll call showed: Present - Commissioner Patricia Archer Commissioner Ken Ellingsworth Commissioner David Randolph Commissioner David Schmidt Mayor Jay Alperin 4. Agenda Approval. Mr. Randolph moved to approve the agenda as submitted, seconded by Mr. Schmidt. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mrs. Archer - Yes; Mr. Ellingsworth - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor Alperin - Yes; Mr. Schmidt - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. 5. Approval of Minutes: None 6. Proclaz~ations: 6.A. Recognizing and commending Fire Marshal Michael D. Cato for his achievements and selection as State of Florida Fire Marshal of the Year (1998) Mayor Alperin read and presented a proclamation recog- nizing and commending Fire Marshal Michael D. Cato for his selection as State of Florida Fire Marshal of the Year (1998) together with his many accomplishments during his years of dedicated public service. Chief Cato came forward to accept the proclamation. 6.B. OF NOTE: Recognizing and commending Mayor Clarence Anthony of South Bay, Florida, on his installation as President of the National League of Cities. Mayor Alperin presented a proclamation in recognition of Mayor Anthony's achievements and noted that it will be for- warded to the upcoming reception for presentation. 7. Presentations: 7.A. Government Finance Officers Association's Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting presented to the City of Delray Beach for its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 1997. Inasmuch as there was no representation from the Finance Department, presentation of the award was postponed to the December 8th regular meeting. 8. CONSENT AGENDA: City Manager recommends approval. 8.A. RATIFICATION OF DDA APPOINTMENT TO THE PARKING MANAGE- MENT ADVISORY BOARD: Ratify the appointment of Frank Wheat as the Downtown Development Authority's representative to the Parking Management Advisory Board to fill an unexpired term ending January 31, 1999. 8.B. FINAL PLAT APPROVAL/WINDSOR COURT: Approve the final subdivision plat for Windsor Court, a proposed ten (10) lot townhouse development located at the southwest corner of Gleason Street and Bay Street. -2- 12/01/98 8.C. STREET NAME FOR DON FRANCISCO'S WAY: Approve a request to change the name of Don Francisco's Way to Marry Fladell Drive. 8.D. SPECIAL EVENT APPROVAL/BUD LIGHT BEACH VOLLEYBALL TOURNAMENT: Approve a request from Exclusive Sports Marketing for special event approval to allow a Bud Light Beach Volleyball Tournament to be held on the municipal beach on December 12, 1998. 8.E. SERVICE AUTHORIZATION #9/DAVID MILLER & ASSOCIATES (POLICE DEPARTMENT EVIDENCE STORAGE BUILDING). Approve Service Authorization #9 in the amount of $21,500.00 with David Miller & Associates for consulting services related to the design and construction administration of a new evidence storage building at the Police department, with funding from 334-6111-519-62.10 (General Construction Fund - Buildings). 8.F. RESOLUTION NO. 74-98. Approve a resolution assessing costs for abatement action required to remove nuisances on 10 properties throughout the City. The caption of Resolution No. 74-98 is as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 100 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, ASSESSING COSTS FOR ABATING NUISANCES UPON CERTAIN LAND(S) LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH AND PROVIDING THAT A NOTICE OF LIEN SHALL ACCOM- PANY THE NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT; SETTING OUT ACTUAL COSTS INCURRED BY THE CITY TO ACCOM- PLISH SUCH ABATEMENT AND LEVYING THE COST OF SUCH ABATEMENT OF NUISANCES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR A DUE DATE AND INTER- EST ON ASSESSMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE RECORD- ING OF THIS RESOLUTION, AND DECLARING SAID LEVY TO BE A LIEN UPON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR UNPAID ASSESSMENTS. (The official copy of Resolution No. 74-98 is on file in the City Clerk's office.) 8.G. REVIEW OF APPEALABLE LAND DEVELOPMENT BOARD ACTIONS: Accept the actions and decisions made by the Land Development Boards for the period November 16th through November 25, 1998. 8.H. AWARD OF BIDS AND CONTRACTS: 1. Bid award to multiple vendors via Palm Beach County Co-op Bid (Delray Beach is lead entity) for the purchase of chemicals and fertilizer at an estimated annual cost of $160,415.20, with funding from Parks and Recreation, Municipal -3- 12/01/98 Golf Course and Lakeview Golf Course operating budgets (line item 52.26 Gardening Supplies). 2. Bid award in the amount of $104,960.72 to National Ambulance Builder, Inc., via City of Boca Raton bid, for the purchase of a 1998 Navistar International heavy duty fire/rescue vehicle, with funding from 501-3312-591-64.20 (Garage - Vehicle Replacement). 3. Bid award in the amount of $69,080 to Shortway Lines of Florida, Inc. for bus rental and driver service for programs in the Parks and Recreation Department, with funding from 115-4912-572-55.30 ($11,700/Special Projects Football Supplies), 001-4106-572-44.90 ($43,330/Summer Day Camp - Other Rental/Lease Costs), 001-4105-572-44.90 ($7,200/After School Program - Other Rental/Lease Costs), and 001-4121-572-44.90 ($7,500/Athletics & Special Events - Other Rental/Lease Costs). 4. Purchase award in the amount of $27,623.00 to Data Flow Systems, Inc., sole source provider, for the purchase of electrical components used to construct radio transmitting units (RTUs) for installation at the golf course wells and generators to replace the existing hard wire system, with funding from 441-5122-536-64.90 (Water Treatment & Storage - Other Machinery/ Equipment). 5. Lease agreement with Saturn of Delray Beach for nine (9) 1999 Saturn SL-ls to replace existing vehicles used by the Police Department's C.O.P. (Citizens On Patrol) program at a cost of $199.00 per vehicle per month for 39 months, for a total annual cost of $21,492.00, plus tags. Funding will be from 001-2113-521-44.40 (Police Dept. Support Services). Mr. Schmidt moved to approve the Consent Agenda as submitted, seconded by Mr. Randolph. Upon roll call the Commis- sion voted as follows: Mr. Ellingsworth - Yes; Mr. Randolph Yes; Mayor Alperin - Yes; Mr. Schmidt - Yes; Mrs. Archer - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. 9. REGULAR AGENDA: 9.A. CONDITIONAL USE MODIFICATION REOUEST/STOR-RITE COMPLEX: Consider a request for conditional use modification approval to allow an expansion of the automobile paint, body and repair facilities within the Stor-Rite complex located on the south side of Dr. Andre's Way (S.W. 2nd Street), approximately 315 feet east of Congress Avenue, adjacent to the CSX Railroad. The subject -4- 12/01/98 property is zoned MIC (Mixed Industrial and Commercial) District. QUASI-JUDICIAL PROCEEDING The City Attorney stated this item will be conducted as a quasi-judicial hearing which allows for presentations by all involved parties, the admission of documents into the record and public testimony. The City Clerk swore in those individuals who wished to give testimony on this item. Diane Dominguez, Director of Planning and Zoning, entered the project file into the record. She stated this request concerns an existing warehouse complex located east of Congress Avenue and south of Atlantic Avenue. The City's Land Development Regulations were recently amended to require that automobile repair services be a conditional use rather than a permitted use in the MIC (Mixed Industrial and Commercial) zone district. This conditional use modification does not designate the individual bays in which the auto repair uses will be located as the landlord wishes to have flexibility with regard to tenant locations based upon occupancy and tenant demands. The proposal is to allow a maximum floor area of 18,077 sq.fto devoted to auto use. The request is being made in this manner so that future conditional use modifications will not have to be made if tenants are relocated within the center. The Planning and Zoning Board considered this item at a public hearing on November 16, 1998, and voted unanimously to recommend approval of the conditional use request based upon positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards) and Section 2.4.5(E) (5) (Required Findings) of the Land Development Regulations and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, subject to the following conditions: (1) Total auto repair, paint and body functions (existing and new) may not exceed 15,000 square feet; (2) The establishment of new auto repair, paint and body uses is restricted as illustrated on Exhibit "B"; (3) Existing auto repair, paint and body shops not located in approved bays may continue to operate, however, if an existing business vacates a non-approved bay, auto repair may not be re-established in that same location; (4) Provide a monitoring well or documentation from DERM that a well is not required; (5) Outside storage of materials is prohibited; (6) A traffic statement must be submitted and ap- proved; and (7) Landscaping as depicted on the approved plan must be reinstated. -5- 12/01/98 Roqer Saberson, attorney reDresentinq the applicant, stated for the record that his client agrees with the Planning and Zoning Board's recommendation. Mayor Alperin declared the public hearing open. There being no one else who, having been duly sworn, wished to address the Commission, the public hearing was closed. Mr. Ellingsworth moved to approve the conditional use modification request for Stor-Rite (automobile paint, body and repair shops), subject to the findings and conditions as recom- mended by the Planning and Zoning Board. The motion was seconded by Mr. Randolph. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor Alperin - Yes; Mr. Schmidt - Yes; Mrs. Archer - Yes; Mr. Ellingsworth - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. 9.B. TENNIS CENTER CONSULTING AGREEMENT/JCD SPORTS GROUP, INC.: Consider approval of a consulting agreement with JCD Sports Group, Inc. for the purpose of attracting special events to the tennis stadium, event management, and development of additional revenue sources for the tennis center, in the amount of $12,000 with funding from 113-4210-575-31.90 (Tennis Center Special Events). Mr. Schmidt moved to approve the consulting agreement with JCD Sports Group, Inc. for the Delray Beach Tennis Center, seconded by Mrs. Archer. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mayor Alperin - Yes; Mr. Schmidt - Yes; Mrs. Archer - Yes; Mr. Ellingsworth - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. 9.C. EDUCATION BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ON T~E SCHOOL BOARD'S FIVE YEAR WORK PLAN AND CAPITAL BUDGET: Consider approval of the Education Board's recommendations and statements regarding the effects of the Five Year Work Plan and 1999 Capital Budget on Delray Beach, and authorize forwarding them to the School Board. Mayor Alperin commented that he sat in on a number of the Education Board's meetings where these issues were discussed. He felt the staff report provides a good analysis of what the problems are and the need for Delray Beach to stand up for itself at the outset in order to be treated fairly. Mr. Schmidt moved to approve the Education Board's recommendations and statements regarding the effects of the 5-Year Work Program and 1999 Capital Budget on Delray Beach, and forward those recommendations to the School Board. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Archer. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mr. Schmidt - Yes; Mrs. Archer - Yes; Mr. Elling- sworth - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor Alperin - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. 6 12/01/98 9.D. RESOLUTION NO. 75-98: Consider approval of a resolu- tion opposing any override of the Governor's veto of House Bill 3075 relating to Police and Fire pensions. The caption of Resolution No. 75-98 is as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, OPPOSING ANY OVERRIDE OF THE GOVERNOR'S VETO OF HOUSE BILL 3075 RELATING TO POLICE AND FIRE PENSIONS; REQUESTING THE OPPORTUNITY TO DEVELOP A NEW, COMPROMISE BILL DURING THE 1999 LEGISLATIVE SESSION; DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PROVIDE COPIES OF THIS RESOLUTION TO APPROPRIATE OFFICIALS; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (The official copy of Resolution No. 75-98 is on file in the City Clerk's office.) Mr. Schmidt moved to approve Resolution No. 75-98, seconded by Mrs. Archer. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mrs. Archer Yes; Mr. Ellingsworth Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor Alperin - Yes; Mr. Schmidt - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. The City Manager reemphasized the importance of the Mayor and City Commissioners making personal contact with the members of the legislative delegation about this issue. There are problems with House Bill 3075; that is the reason the Gover- nor vetoed it. If some of the conflicting language were clari- fied, it might become more acceptable. Ideally, the City would like to see credit given for those benefits we have now that exceed the new minimums rather than having to keep those in place plus come up to minimums in other areas which over the years in our negotiations with our union have not been so important to them. He reiterated that this is an important statewide issue and the Commission's personal contact is very valuable. 9.E. SETTLEMENT/ALBAUGH V. CITY OF DELRAY BEACH: Consider settlement of the referenced matter as recommended by the City Attorney. The City Attorney stated that the plaintiff, through his attorney, has offered to settle the case for $28,000 which includes all attorney's fees and costs. If accepted by the Commission, the City Attorney's office will obtain a complete release from the plaintiff for all claims. Ms. Ruby recommended acceptance of the settlement offer. Mr. Randolph commented that there have been quite a few of these sidewalk suits recently and it really brings home the need to be responsive to sidewalk maintenance. He felt the City ought to have some kind of reporting system and be very, very responsive to areas requiring maintenance. By so doing, perhaps -7- 12/01/98 some of the lawsuits that are brought against the City could be eliminated. Mr. Randolph moved to approve the settlement of Albaugh v. City of Delray Beach as recommended by the City Attorney. The motion was seconded by Mr. Schmidt. Upon roll call the Commis- sion voted as follows: Mr. Ellingsworth - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor Alperin - Yes; Mr. Schmidt - Yes; Mrs. Archer - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. 9.F. CITY COMMISSION LIAISON TO PARKING MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD: Consider appointment of a replacement City Commission liaison to the Parking Management Advisory Board. Mayor Alperin asked if anyone on the City Commission was interested in replacing Mr. Egan as liaison to the Parking Management Advisory Board? He noted that the majority of Commis- sion liaison assignments were done away with at the last organ- izational meeting. Mr. Ellingsworth commented that Mr. Egan had specifi- cally asked to continue on as liaison to the parking board since he had been involved with the Parking Management Team before it became a formal advisory body. Since any member of the Commis- sion can attend any board or committee meeting that they might be interested in, he did not feel it was necessary to appoint a formal replacement for Mr. Egan. Mrs. Archer then stated that she would be willing to continue in the capacity of City Commission liaison to the Parking Management Advisory Board. Mr. Ellingsworth so moved, seconded by Mr. Schmidt. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor Alperin - Yes; Mr. Schmidt - Yes; Mrs. Archer - Yes; Mr. Ellingsworth - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. At this point, the time being 6:25 p.m., the Commission moved to Item 12, First Readings, on the agenda. 12. FIRST READINGS: 12.A. ORDINANCE NO. 49-98: An ordinance annexing Lot 61, Second Addition to Country Club Acres, located on the north side of Jefferson Road approximately 100 feet east of Military Trail and 600 feet south of Atlantic Avenue; providing for a small scale Future Land Use Map amendment from County MR-5 (Medium Density Residential 5 dwelling units/acre) to City General Commercial; and establishing initial zoning of GC (General Commercial) District for Boca Delray Animal Hospital. If passed, a quasi-judicial public hearing will be scheduled for January 5, 1999. The City Manager presented Ordinance No. 49-98: -8- 12/01/98 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, ANNEXING TO THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, LOT 61, SECOND ADDITION TO COUNTRY CLUB ACRES, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF JEFFERSON ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 100 FEET EAST OF MILITARY TRAIL AND 600 FEET SOUTH OF ATLANTIC AVENUE, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DE- SCRIBED HEREIN, WHICH LAND IS CONTIGUOUS TO EXISTING MUNICIPAL LIMITS; REDEFINING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE SAID LAND; PROVIDING FOR THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF SAID LAND; AFFIXING AN OFFICIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION OF GC (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) FOR SAID LAND TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AS CONTAINED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; ELECTING TO PROCEED UNDER THE SINGLE HEARING ADOPTION PROCESS FOR SMALL SCALE LAND USE PLAN AMEND- MENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE ZONING THEREOF TO GC (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT; PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, A SAVING CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (The official copy of Ordinance No. 49-98 is on file in the City Clerk's office.) The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance. Mr. Schmidt moved to approve Ordinance No. 49-98 on FIRST Reading, seconded by Mr. Randolph. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mayor Alperin - Yes; Mr. Schmidt - Yes; Mrs. Archer - Yes; Mr. Ellingsworth - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. 12.B. ORDINANCE NO. 50-98: An ordinance amending LDR Section 4.6.16, "Landscape Regulations", regarding the types of plant materials that can be located within utility easements. If passed, a public hearing will be scheduled for January 5, 1999. The City Manager presented Ordinance No. 50-98: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 4.6.16, "LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS", SUBSECTION 4.6.16(A), "PURPOSE", OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, TO PROVIDE FOR PROPER TREE SELECTION ADJACENT TO OR WITHIN UTILITY EASEMENTS; AMENDING SUBSECTION 4.6.16(D) , "SITE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS" , BY ENACTING SUBPARAGRAPH 4 . 6 . 16 (D) (4) , "TREE SELECTION ADJACENT TO OR WITHIN UTILITY EASEMENTS", TO PROVIDE FOR RESTRICTIONS ON TREES PLANTED ADJACENT TO OR WITHIN UTILITY EASEMENTS; PROVIDING A GENERAL -9- 12/01/98 REPEALER CLAUSE, A SAVING CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (The official copy of Ordinance No. 50-98 is on file in the City Clerk's office.) The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance. Mr. Ellingsworth moved to approve Ordinance No. 50-98 on FIRST Reading, seconded by Mrs. Archer. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mr. Schmidt - Yes; Mrs. Archer - Yes; Mr. Ellingsworth - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor Alperin - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. 12.C. ORDINANCE NO. 51-98: An ordinance amending Chapter 39, "Returned Check Service Charge", of the City Code by making changes to the City's returned check policies. If passed, a public hearing will be scheduled for January 5, 1999. The City Manager presented Ordinance No. 51-98: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 39, "RETURNED CHECK SERVICE CHARGE", OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, BY AMENDING SECTION 39.01, "SERVICE CHARGE FOR RETURNED CHECKS", TO SET THE FEE FOR RETURNED CHECKS AT TWENTY DOLLARS OR FIVE PERCENT OF THE FACE VALUE OF THE CHECK, WHICHEVER IS GREATER, AND TO PROVIDE FOR DISCRETIONARY LANGUAGE ALLOWING FOR EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES TO BE CONSIDERED REGARDING RETURNED CHECKS; REPEALING CHAPTER 50, "UTILITIES GENERALLY; PUBLIC SERVICE TAX", SECTION 50.02, "SERVICE CHARGE FOR RETURNED CHECKS ON UTILITY BILL FOR WATER AND SEWER SERVICE", AND CHAPTER 51, "GARBAGE AND TRASH", SECTION 51.76, "COLLECTION CHARGE FOR RETURNED CHECKS", AS BEING UNNECESSARILY DUPLICATIVE; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE, A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (The official copy of Ordinance No. 51-98 is on file in the City Clerk's office.) The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance. She stated the proposed ordinance comports with state statute and provides for some discretion when, for example, it is not the fault of the customer that a check is returned. Mrs. Archer moved to approve Ordinance No. 51-98 on FIRST Reading, seconded by Mr. Ellingsworth. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mrs. Archer - Yes; Mr. Ellingsworth -10- 2/01/ 8 - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor Alperin - Yes; Mr. Schmidt - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. At this point, the time being 6:30 p.m., the Commission moved to Item 11, Comments and Inquiries on Non-Agenda Items from the Public, on the agenda. 11. Comments and Inquiries on Non-Agenda Items from the Public-Immediately followinq Public Hearinqs: ll.A. City Manaqer's response to prior public comments and inquiries. There were no responses to prior public comments. ll.B. From the Public. 11.B.1. Charles Powe11, 1920 Spanish Trail, stated that he is the plaintiff in a lawsuit with the City. He recently received an affidavit from the City Attorney's office with respect to the issue of paving of an alley near his property that had been settled by the Appellate Court. He expressed the concern that the affidavit, which grants to him a permanent waiver of paving the alley, was signed by the City Manager. In his opinion, the City Manager does not have the authority to grant infrastructure waivers of city streets. He asked the City Commission to either take an affirmative action in granting the provisions of the affidavit or else deny his request. In response, the City Attorney stated the City is in litigation with Mr. Powell and the waiver is a result of an Appellate Court ruling about the applicability of the City's land development regulations as read by the Appellate Court. The waiver is a result of a Court decision and is not something that was decided by staff. The Court required it. In rebuttal, Mr. Powell stated the appellate decision relates to the fact that City employees do not have the right to interpret or modify the local city laws enacted by the City Commission. He further stated the lawsuit has always been about that certain city employees, including the City Manager, required him to pave a street without a public assessment. He objected, and that has been the basis of the suit. Mr. Powell concluded by stating that the Appellate Court's order indicates that employees do not have this right, only the City Commission has that right. 11.B.2. Jim Mitchell, 919 Hyacinth Drive in Tropic Isle, questioned the selection process used for the appointment of Mrs. Archer to the vacant City Commission seat. He stated it was his understanding that at the November 17th City Commission meeting, the statement was made that each of the applicants had been evaluated and Mrs. Archer was chosen out of eight applicants. Mr. Mitchell asked if the evaluations were made at a public meeting or a private one since there was no discussion at the -11- 12/01/98 November 17th meeting. He asked if the Mayor and City Commis- sioners had come to a conclusion without a meeting? Mr. Mitchell further asked if this evaluation or selection was made in accor- dance with the Sunshine Law? Mayor Alperin asked if any member of the City Commis- sion had spoken to any other member about the appointment outside of the regular meeting on November 17, 19987 The Mayor and City Commissioners unanimously indicated there was no outside discus- sion or meetings concerning the appointment apart from the November 17th public meeting. Mrs. Archer stated she had previously spoken with members of the City Commission several weeks prior to Mr. Egan's resignation about her intent to seek office in the March, 1999, municipal election when Mr. Ellingsworth's seat would become vacant. At that time she was not aware that Mr. Egan would be resigning from the City Commission. ll.B.3. Josh Smith, Jr., 3616 Avenue de Gien, also expressed concern about what he referred to as the "slick" manner in which the appointment to the vacant City Commission seat was handled. Mr. Smith stated that combined with recent allegations of racial bias, many minorities feel that at least one or more individuals are not capable of aligning themselves with anything that is just and right for black citizens. He stated that decent, fair-minded citizens, both black and white, can see this and know that it is not right; it is wrong. Mr. Smith asked the Commission to do some deep soul searching, eliminate self-perceptions, and start seriously considering the perceptions of others. 13. Comments and Inquiries on Non-Agenda Items: 13.A. City Attorney. The City Attorney had no comments or inquiries. 13.B. City Manager. The City Manager had no comments or inquiries. 13.C. City Commission. 13.C.1. Commissioner Schmidt stated he had received a telephone call from someone who lives up on North Federal Highway about the landscaping that has been put in on U.S. Highway #1, complaining about the quality of it. While he did not see the newspaper article, supposedly there was a comment in the article by Nancy Davila to the effect that we just have to be satisfied with what was put in. Mr. Schmidt commented that if substandard landscap- ing was installed, he felt this should be pursued with the Florida Department of Transportation. 12/01/98 In response, the City Manager stated he did not remem- ber exactly what the quote was, but staff has not been happy with the landscaping. A very unsatisfactory landscape subcontractor was used on the job. He recalled Ms. Davila talking particularly about the palm trees which were supposed to be a certain grade and they were not that grade, but it was staff's conclusion that it would be better to let them stay there and grow out so they would reach that grade rather than changing them out which is what Boynton Beach chose to do. The City Manager further noted that the irrigation system is being replaced. The City would not accept the work because the soil was not treated properly to keep the grass and weeds out, so they are continuing to maintain it for a year before the City will consider taking it over for maintenance. It will not be accepted for maintenance until it meets City standards. 13.C.2. Commissioner Archer had no comments or inquiries. 13.C.3. Commissioner Ellinqsworth had no comments or inquiries. 13.C.4. Commissioner Randolph had no comments or inquiries. 13.C.5. Mayor Alperin welcomed Mrs. Archer to the City Commis- sion. At this point, the time being 6:45 p.m., Mayor Alperin declared a recess until 7:00 p.m. for the Public Hearings portion of the agenda. The time being 7:00 p.m., Mayor Alperin reconvened the meeting for the duly advertised Public Hearings portion of the agenda. 10. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 10.A. ORDINANCE NO. 47-98: An ordinance amending LDR Section 4.6.9. (E), "Location of Parking Spaces", and Section 4.4.13(G), "Supplemental District Regulations" in the CBD, regarding in-lieu of parking regulations. Prior to consideration of passage of this ordinance on Second and FINAL Reading, a public hearing has been scheduled to be held at this time. The City Manager presented Ordinance No. 47-98: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 4.6.9, "OFF-STREET PARKING REGULA- TIONS'', SUBSECTION 4.6.9(E), "LOCATION OF PARKING SPACES" OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, TO PROVIDE FOR REVISED IN LIEU OF PARKING REGULATIONS; AMENDING SECTION 4.4.13, "CEN- TRAL BUSINESS (CBD) DISTRICT", SUBSECTION 4.4.13(G), "SUPPLEMENTAL DISTRICT REGULA- -13- 12/01/98 TIONS", TO EXCLUDE RESTAURANTS FROM THE REDUCED PARKING REQUIREMENT IN THAT CERTAIN AREA OF THE CBD MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, A SAVING CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (The official copy of Ordinance No. 47-98 is on file in the City Clerk's office.) The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance. A public hearing was held having been legally advertised in compli- ance with the laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the City of Delray Beach, Florida. Mayor Alperin declared the public hearing open. Bill Branninq, President of Pineapple Grove Main Street and business owner at 9 N.E. 2nd Street, spoke in opposition to the proposed ordinance. The Pineapple Grove Main Street Board feels that the change in the parking requirement for restaurant use will have the effect of imposing a moratorium on restaurants in Pineapple Grove. Much of the area is built out and in many cases additional parking is just not available. Many of the restauranteurs and entrepreneurs interested in coming into the area to help it move forward are not large operations and cannot afford thousands of dollars in in-lieu fees. Mr. Branning continued that the Pineapple Grove neighborhood plan which was adopted by the City Commission calls for Pineapple Grove Way (N.E. 2nd Avenue) to have its parking requirements changed so that it would be the same as for Atlantic Avenue, where the strategy was to allow reduced parking in order to encourage the redevelopment which has occurred. The PGMS Board want the same opportunity for Pineapple Grove Way and feels that the imposition of further parking restrictions will be a roadblock to this effort. Mr. Branning also expressed concern about the proposed increase in the amount of the in lieu fee from $6,000 to $12,000, contending that it is too high for Pineapple Grove and will further hinder redevelopment. While the PGMS Board recognizes there are parking problems in the City, it does not feel it is fair to have an across the board fee for all areas. In conclu- sion, Mr. Branning asked that the City Commission consider either excluding the Pineapple Grove area from the effect of the ordi- nance or postponing any vote on the ordinance altogether to allow more time for the proposal to be reviewed by all of the interest- ed parties. Michael Welner, 102 North Swinton Avenue, on behalf of the Richwaqens who own Power's Lounqe, stated he does not feel there is so much a parking problem in the downtown area as there is a perception problem. People may not be used to walking more than a city block to get where they want to go in the downtown, but it is something that is done regularly at places such as the Town Center Mall. He cautioned against ruining what can become a great City-scape in an attempt to overly accommodate parking and -14- 12/01/98 the car. It was when the City got rid of that thinking on Atlantic Avenue that the downtown really started to turn around. If the parking requirements become too stringent and too expen- sive, it is going to constrict further redevelopment in and as an offshoot of the downtown area. Mr. Weiner felt that the public will get used to walking and it will not be necessary to turn the downtown area into one huge parking area. Hence, he concurred with Mr. Branning that the issue be postponed for further scruti- ny to see what it's real impact will be on the City's successful redevelopment strategy to-date. Chris Brown, CRA Executive Director, stated that he, too, feels additional study is needed. The two issues which especially need to be looked at further are (1) the change in the parking for restaurants as it relates to both the Pineapple Grove area and new restaurants coming in as well as the potential impact on expansion plans for existing restaurants, and (2) a serious review of what is counted as restaurant space in terms of square footage. Fran Marancola, 36 South Ocean Boulevard, expressed his opposition to an ordinance that would impose a fee of $12,000 per in lieu parking space and then increase the amount of parking spaces that would have to be provided for restaurants. He felt this made no sense if the idea is to encourage new businesses and redevelopment. He suggested that a better way to approach the parking problem would be for the Commission to focus on pursuing a parking garage because that is really what is needed to fix the problem. Matt Gracey, DroDerty owner at 501-507 East Atlantic Avenue, expressed his opposition to the proposed ordinance. He stated it has taken too long to get Atlantic Avenue turned around to now take away one of the strongest economic incentives used to get there. He sympathized with the problem, but did not feel that any real solution has yet to be proposed. The proposed ordinance may be the easiest thing, but in his opinion it is not a good solution. Mr. Gracey urged that the matter be postponed~ and the issue studied further. Gary ElioDoulos, 14 N.E. 4th Avenue, and a member of the Planninq and Zoninq Board, stated that as an architect he is in favor of the use of in-lieu of parking fees; however, in this instance he is not sure if the proposed ordinance is the right way to go about it. He expressed concern as to the impact on redevelopment efforts in Pineapple Grove as well as West Atlantic Avenue. Mr. Eliopoulos urged that the ordinance be looked at further for possible adjustments on the basis of location and redevelopment incentives, noting that every area of the City cannot be treated the same; there needs to be some flexibility. There being no one else who wished to address the City Commission, the public hearing was closed. -15- 12/01/98 Discussion by the Commission followed. Mr. Randolph expressed concern about the increased fee and its potential impact on redevelopment along West Atlantic Avenue and Pineapple Grove where businesses will probably be smaller and there is just not that much extra space for parking. He felt the ordinance should be remanded for further study, along with a better look at what will really be involved with bringing about a public parking facility such as a garage. Mr. Ellingsworth commented that some very good points had been made this evening and he felt some further study should probably be undertaken. However, he felt the proposed ordinance should be in place during the time it takes for these discus- sions. Mr. Ellingsworth moved to approve Ordinance No. 47-98 on Second and FINAL Reading. Mayor Alperin stated that he felt a moratorium should have been imposed a long time ago on the use of the in lieu of fees until a determination was made on the best way to proceed. He also felt there is still confusion over what an in lieu of fee means. If you don't have an in lieu fee, then you have to provide the parking. The in lieu fee is a way of allowing development that would not occur otherwise. So just the exis- tence of an in lieu of fee is an advantage this City provides over other communities. In his mind, you don't use an in lieu of fee unless the intent is to use that money to provide the parking that the money is replacing. The fee that is charged has to be appropriate to replace the parking someplace else in that area. Mayor Alperin continued that he agreed with Commission- er Randolph that the fee should be different for different areas. This is the one major disagreement that he had with the proposed ordinance, but he was willing to go along with it so that there would be something in effect. He felt that not only should land values be considered, but also the need to create an economic stimulus in a particular area. He commented that if the Commis- sion is willing to give direction to staff as well as the Parking Management Advisory Board that consideration should be given to these issues, he would support sending the ordinance back for further review. Mr. Schmidt commented that he had discussed a similar idea with the City Attorney and she had a concern that if we create districts with different in lieu of parking fees, that the money that is raised from the fees would only be able to be used in those areas, and we may not raise enough money in an area from in lieu of fees to deal with the parking that is needed there. He was not concerned that the Commission might need to deal with this at some point, to possibly take some money from somewhere else to subsidize the fees that have been raised in another area, but he did have a concern about stifling redevelopment in the areas that most need it. He felt the $12,000 per space fee would do just that in certain areas. He would not be opposed to -16- 12/01/98 sending the ordinance back with direction, provided the City Attorney felt it might be possible to write something that would allow money collected in one area to ultimately be spent in another area. The City Attorney felt this could probably be done. Mrs. Archer commented that she is in favor of having the in lieu of fee; however, the $12,000 figure may be too high. She would support the concept of districts with appropriate flexibility. She further noted that while restaurants are usually one of the first methods of redevelopment and growth in an area, they are also the first business to fold in an economic downturn. Along this line, she felt it would be prudent to curtail the huge expansion of restaurants on Atlantic Avenue in favor of developing some other retail growth that would provide more long term support for the City should a downturn happen. Mr. Ellingsworth commented that if the Commission decided to send the ordinance back for review, he would ask that a moratorium be put in place until the review is complete or that the review be considerably expedited. Mrs. Archer recommended that the phasing of the payment schedule for in lieu of fees that are not paid totally up front also be looked at since the proposed schedule could prove ex- tremely burdensome to someone just starting up a business. Mr. Schmidt then commented that he felt the issue of a parking garage is completely separate from the in lieu of parking fee ordinance. The money to pay for a parking garage is not going to come from in lieu fees. If the Commission decides that a garage is the way to go, then there needs to be some serious consideration given to how it is going to be financed. Upon further discussion, it was the consensus of the City Commission to remand Ordinance No. 47-98 to the Parking Management Advisory Board for further study and refinement, with direction that the matter be workshopped by the City Commission on January 12, 1999. The motion on the floor died for lack of a second. Mr. Schmidt moved to continue the public hearing on Ordinance No. 47-98 to the date certain of January 19, 1999, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Archer. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mr. Ellingsworth - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor Alperin - Yes; Mr. Schmidt - Yes; Mrs. Archer - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. Prior to adjournment, Mayor Alperin asked if there were any additional comments from the public on non-agendaed items? -17- 12/01/98 Robert Victorin, President of Ocean Place Condominium Association, 120 South Ocean Boulevard, stated that the 29 unit owners of Ocean Place Condominium live right on the northern boundary of Sandoway Park. It was brought to their attention that the Sandoway House Nature Center had requested and received approval to use Sandoway Park for an evening event on December 23, 1998, and to keep the park open beyond the normal closing hour until 9:00 p.m. While not opposed to the Sandoway House Nature Center, Mr. Victorin stated that the Ocean Place condomin- ium owners have consistently opposed any move toward night-time parking in Sandoway Park on the grounds that it would entail noise, lights, after-hours congregating and security risks detrimental to the personal and property values of the residents. If the park is to be utilized as parking space for the December 23rd reception at the Sandoway House, the residents of Ocean Place Condominium hope and trust this will be considered a specific, one-time only, seasonal exception from the hours of 7:00-9:00 p.m., and that it will not be considered a precedent for future or broader night-time parking at Sandoway Park. Frank J. Devine, 2200 South Ocean Boulevard and Execu- tive Director of the Beach Property Owners' Association, stated that this year has welcomed a remarkable and positive achievement in the official inauguration of Sandoway House. The Beach Property Owners' Association congratulates its founders on their initial success and wish them well for the future, and likewise congratulates Sandoway House on its first-ever holiday reception to be held on December 23rd. Mr. Devine continued that the BPOA, however, has strongly opposed night-time parking at any of Sandoway, Ingraham or Anchor Parks. While the Association can recognize the specific nature and justification for this particu- lar holiday exception, they would not want to see it generalized as a precedent for change in the overall question of beach-front parking. For that reason, the BPOA wished to endorse for the record the remarks just offered by Mr. Victorin. There being no further business, Mayor Alperin declared the meeting adjourned at 7:50 p.m. ~ity C14rk - ' ATTEST: The undersigned is the City Clerk of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, and the information provided herein is the minutes of the meeting of said City Commission of December 1, 1998, which minutes were formally approved and adopted by the City Commission -18- 12/01/98 City- C]~rk z NOTE TO READER: If the minutes you have received are not com- pleted as indicated above, this means they are not the official minutes of the City Commission. They will become the official minutes only after review and approval which may involve some amendments, additions or deletions. -19- 12/01/98