Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
90-94
ORDINANCE NO. 90-94 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, ADOPTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE "LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION ACT", FLORIDA STATUTES SECTIONS 163.3161 THROUGH 163.3243, INCLUSIVE; ALL AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" ENTITLED "COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1" AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE, A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Delray Beach exercised the authority granted pursuant to the provisions of Florida Statutes Sections 163.3161 through 163.3243, known as the "Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act"; and WHEREAS, via Ordinance No. 82-89, the City Commission adopted the document entitled "Comprehensive Plan - Delray Beach, Florida"; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board, as Local Planning Agency, did prepare an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan entitled "Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1"; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board, as Local Planning Agency, following due public notice, held a public hearing on April 18, 1994, in accordance with the requirements of the "Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act"; and WHEREAS, after the above referenced public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Board, as Local Planning Agency, recommended to the City Commission that the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1 be transmitted; and WHEREAS, proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1 was submitted to and reviewed by the City Commission; and WHEREAS, following due public notice, the first of two required public hearings on Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1 was held by the City Commission on May 17, 1994, at which time it was authorized to be transmitted to the Department of Community Affairs for required review; and WHEREAS, a report of Objections, Recommendations and Comments (CRC) has been received from the State Department of Community Affairs and said report has been reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Board, as Local Planning Agency, and is the basis for modifications to the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1~ and WHEREAS, following due public notice, the second of two required public hearings on Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1 was held on November 15, 1994, in accordance with statutory requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: ~ That the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, hereby declares its intent to exercise the authority granted pursuant to the provisions of Florida Statutes Sections 163.3161 through 163.3243, inclusive, known as the "Local Government Planning and Land Development Regulation Act". ~ That in implementation of its declared intent as set forth in Section 1 of this ordinance, there is hereby adopted the document entitled "Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1", which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference. ~ That the document entitled "Comprehensive Plan - Delray Beach, Florida" is hereby amended pursuant to the document entitled "Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1". ~_~ That should any section or provision of this ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence or word be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. ~_~ That all ordinances or parts of ordinances which are in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. ~_~ That this ordinance shall become effective upon issuance of a final order determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Florida Statutes Section 163.3184(9), by the State Department of Community Affairs, or until the Administration Commission issues a final order determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Florida Statutes Section 163.3184(10). - 2 - Ord. No. 90-94 PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final reading on this the 15th day of November , 1994. ATTEST: - Cit~ C~erk ' First Reading November 1, 1994 Second Reading November 15, 1994 - 3 - Ord. No. 90-94 EXHIBIT "A" (tO Ordinance No. 90-94) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1 CONSERVATION ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-A-13, Policy A-1.4 (NEW) Policy A-1.4 The City shall encourage the preservation of existing groundwater recharge areas through sensitive site planning~, including maximizing open space, pretreatment of stormwater runofft etc. In the case of environmentally sensitive lands~ such preservation may include development under "planned development" concepts, exaction (public sites dedication provisions of the Land Development Regulations)t or acquisition (including the County Environmentally Sensitive Lands Acquisition Program). 2. Location: Pg. III-A-15, Policy A-4.2 ~Xt~ddX ~ZddZa,~lP' ~add~ (~ZI (Deleted by Amendment 94-1) 3. Location: Pg. III-A-15, Policy A-4.6 Policy A-4.6 Water which flows in canals or drainage lakes shall be used wherever possibl-~ for irrigation of golf courses and open space areas. The possibility of such water use shall be explored during the review of any development plans which are in proximity of such a water source. This submittal requirement shall be included in the required updating of land use regulations which follows adoption of the Plan. (cl) 4. Location: Pg. III-A-16, Policy A-4.7a and Policy A-4.Tb Policy A-4.7a The City shall continue its pres~pt policy of requiring a water source, other than City water, for irrigation purposes in geographically defined areas of the City. Policy A-4.Tb The City, through the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Boardt sha.ll implement the "Northeast Quadrant Reclaimed Water System" project to reclaim a portion of the effluent from the Wastewater Treatment Plant for irrigation purposes. The City, through the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Boardt shall also explore the feasibility of the reuse of wastewater effluent for groundwater recharge in FY 93/94. Based upon the results of this feasibility studyt the City~ through the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Board; may develop a program to fully implement the reclamation and reuse 'of sewage wastewater effluent in the future. (Also see Public Facilities Policy B-2.1 for related policy) d~aZZ aZd~ ~d~d~ ~ dda ~f 5. Location: Pg. III-A-17, Policy 9-1.2 Policy B-1.2 The Delray Oaks area of the Alfieri Pugliese Park of Commerce shall be preserved through sensitive development under "planned development" concepts~ exaction (public sites dedication provisions of the Land Development Requlations)~ or acquisition (including the County Environmentally Sensitive Lands Acquisition Program}. The City shall participate with the County in seeking State funding for the ac~uisition of the Delray Oaks site and its development as a preservation area. add Hurricane Pines along S.W. 10th Street should be preserved · in part through sensitive site planning. 6. Location: Pg. III-A-l?, Policy B-1.4 FdZf~ g/Ill 8LI!~dd addg~Zdd df ~XZd FZad ddd Zd~dtdd~dtdddd~aZ CddtdZda~Zdd XZdddd~ ~Xd CZ~ Page 2 7. Location: Pg. III-A-17, Objective B-2 Objective B-2: To increase public awareness and provide for the protection of flora, fauna, and wildlife through programs of education and regulation. Regulatory measures shall ensure the protectiont preservation; conservation; and appropriate use and protection of fisheries; wildlife and marine habitats which serve as habitat for endanqered and threatened plant and animal species. 8. Location: Pg. III-A-18, Policy B-3.2 Policy B-3.2 T~tddd~ Zd~d~dd~dtfudddZdl dffdt~d ~ddd~d ~d~d ~dpd~ dd g~d dXd~d Z~dd~ ?he City supports Palm Beach County's program to restore and protect the shoreline of Lake Ida. In addition; the City supports continuing monitorinq of boating activity in the lake to assure that this activity does not produce adverse impacts on the shoreline. Page 3 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-B-22, Policy A-1.2 Policy A-1.2 Even though current standards for ocean discharge of effluent are being met, the use of ocean discharge may not, in the long ter~, be an acceptable method of disposal for allt or even the majority, of effluent. A program to fully implement the reclamation and reuse of sewage effluent may be developed by the City, through the Wastewater Treatment Facility Board, in the future. This program would continue the use of ocean discharger on a limited basis~ to dispose of excess effluent~ especially during the rainy season. A ~dd~dd fd~ ~Md ~dddd df 2. Location: Pg. Ill-B-25, Policy 9-2.1 Policy. B-2.1 THd ~Z~d~d&~iffd df ddH~HdZH~ ~Hd ~dtg~d~"lP ~tddgdddgi ddd gNdd dddd d~Hdt id d ~d~MdZ~dZ dgddZdd~ The City, through the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility 9oard~ shall develop a program to implement the "Northeast Quadrant Reclaimed Water System" project to reclaim a portion of the effluent from the Wastewater Treatment Plant for irrigation purposes. The City, through the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Board~ shall also explore the feasibility of the reuse of wastewater effluent for groundwater recharge in FY 93/94. Based upon the results of this feasibility studyt the City~ through the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Board~ may develop a program to fully implement the reclamation and reuse of sewage wastewater effluent in the future. (Also see Conservation Policy A-4.Tb for related policy) 3. Location: Pg. III'B-25, Policy B-2.5 (New) Polic~ B-2.5 The City shall develop a program to construct at least one Aquifer Storage and Page 4 ~ Recovery (ASR) well to supplement water supply durinq conditions of drought or well field contamination and as a method of balancing the demand on water supply wells during periods of high and iow demand. This program shall include feasibility studiest designt and construction as warranted by the results of the feasibility studies. 4. Location: Pg. III-B-25, Policy B-3.1 Policy B-3.1 The City shall maintain its program of responsible consumption of water (per capita basis) and shall decrease the overall per capita consumption of water by 10% from 1989 levels through continued implementation of the following techniques and programs: (Also see Objective A-4 of the Conservation Element). · maintaining its water rate structure which establishes an inverted block -rate structure to set hiqher consumption rates for increased water use ~Zd d ~Z~ d~Zf~ ~d~ ~9~[Z~ ~M~ in order to promote reductions in water consumption as well as establishment of conservation surcharges, based on South Florida Water Management District formulae, and keyed to various levels of drought alert; · mandatory use of wells for irrigation purposes where conditions permit [LDR Section 7.7]; · continued ~M~¢~d enforcement of water use laws; · The consideration of ~~~d xeriscape landscaping alternatives ~ ~Xd~ for all new development during the review of site and development plans [LDR Section 4.6.16(E)]; and · continuation of the regular preventive maintenance program for water mains, pumps and meters (see related Policy C-¢.3) Page OPEN SPACE'AND RECREATION ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-D-21, Policy B-2.5 (NEW) Policy B-2.5 The City shall ensure that public access is provided to publicly owned natural areas that provide passive resource based facilities (i.e. trailst wildlife observation areast etc.) for the public use and en~o~ment of the site. For the Delray Oaks sitez access to be provided by the County will include public Darking. 2. Location: Pg. III-D-21, Policy B-2.6 (NEW) Policy B-2.6 The City shall ensure that passive resource based facilities (i.e. tralls~ wildlife observation areas~ etc.) will be provided for the public use and' en~o~ment of publicly owned natural areas. For the Delray Oaks site; facllitie~ to be provided by the County will include a trail and informational display. Page 6 . HOUSING ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-E-6, Figure H-1 This figure, "Major Residential Parcels", has been replaced with a new figure, "Potential Residential Units", to provide up to date (1994) information. SEE FIGURE H-1 ON PAOE 8 2. Location: Pg. III-E-7, Table H-1 IIIIIII"''""'"/////! ""'"" '""'""'''''" ''"'''" P~~ Fd~ZZ~ FddZZ~ T~dZ ,,/,,,,,,,,,,,/////////! ,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, ///////////////// ~dZ~d PZd~ddd~ ' NOTE: ~ USE DESIG~ONS OUTSIDE ~E CI~ ~E ~VISORY. N PO~ RESID[~ UNffS ~ A F~U.~ ~~ ~ ~ ~, o~0 , J I I I I I I II I III I I I II II II Page 8 3. LocatiOn: Pg. III-E-7, Table H-2 "'''' ''''"''' II''''"'/////// IIIIIIIIII l''''"'''llllllll,,,,,,,,, I!1111 IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IJlllllllllll~llll IIIIII lllllllll llllllllllllllll illlllllll llllllllllllllllll 'IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ,,,,,,,,,,'''''''"' ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,'''''''''"''''''' SEE TABLE H-2 ON PAGE 10 4. Location: Pg. III-E-18, Policy A-1.4 Policy A-1.4: That these neighborhoods be identified as "stable residential" on the Housing Map, that the most restrictive residential zoning district which is applicable is affixed on the zoning map, and that requests for rezoning to a different zone designation, other than Community Facilities and Open Space be denied. 5. Location: Pg. III-E-19, Policy A-2.4. Policy A-2.4: That these neighborhoods be Identified as "stable residential" on the Housing Map, that the most restrictive residential zoning district which is applicable is affixed on the zoning map, and that requests for rezoning to a different zone designation, other than Community Fac~litiee and Open Space be denied. Page 9 -- TABLE H-2 AND TABLE L-4 POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS FEBRUARY 1994 CURRENT POTENTIAL I ID' I DESIGNATION I ZONING I ACRES UNITS 101 LOW DENSITY R1AA 10.00 50.0 103 LOW DENSITY PRD 5.00 25.0 110 LOW DENSITY CNTY 20.32 101.6 124 LOW DENSITY SAD 31.08 155.4 128 LOW DENSITY RiA 9.99 50.0 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 76.39 ..... 382.0 104 MEDIUM DENSITY CNTY 4.94 59.3 105 MEDIUM DENSITY CNTY 6.47 77.6 107 MEDIUM DENSITY CNTY 14.23 170.8 116 MEDIUM DENSITY RM 20.18 242.2 117 MEDIUM DENSITY RR 14.79 177.5 118 MEDIUM DENSITY CF 36.80 441.6 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 97.41 ..... 1,169.0 i25 MIXED USE SAD 10.54 126.5 142 MIXED USE ' CNTY 94.82 680.0 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 105.36 ..... 806.5 102 RURAL RESIDENTIAL CNTY 107.01 535.1 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 107.01 ..... 535.1 106 TRANSITIONAL CNTY 8.38 100.6 111 TRANSITIONAL CNTY 8.32 99.8 113 TRANSITIONAL CNTY 17.56 210.7 114 TRANSITIONAL A 6 · 21 74.5 123 TRANSITIONAL POC 7. IS 85.8 127 TRANSITIONAL RM 6.12 73.4 139 TRANSITIONAL POC 18.83 262.0 143 TRANSITIONAL A 33.97 407.6 146 TRANSITIONAL CNTY 52.18 626.2 147 TRAHSITIOIiAL POC 10.00 120.0 -~q)TAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 168.72 ..... 2,060.6 122 PIt~VIOU8 APPROVAL RN-8 18,$6 140.0 150 PREVIOUS APPROVAL PRD 0.00 138.0 1S1 PREVIOUS APPROVAL PRD 0,00 114.0 152 PREVIOUS APPROVAL SAD 0.00 292.0 153 PREVIOUS APPROVAL RM 0.00 158.0 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 18.56 ..... 842.0 GRAIqD~)TAL, ........ . .................... $73.4S ..... 5,795.2 NOTE: LAND USE DESIGNATIONS OUTSIDE THE CITY ARE ADVISORY. SOURCE: CITY OF DELRAy BEACH, 1994. Page lO COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-F-9, second bullet under Hurricane Evacuation · Within this area there is a population of approximately 7353 S[~22 (1990 lJBf Census Tracts 64, 7401, 7402~ 54.03). 2. Location: Pg. III-F-19, Policy A-2.3 Policy A-2.3: The City shall request of the City of Boynton Beach, the Town of Gulfstream, the Town of Highland Beach, and Boca Baton that notice be given of any develoDment which shall impact the Intracoastal Waterway by diversion of runoff, the increase in direct runoff, or the introduction of a water-dependent use or commercial or industrial use along the Intracoastal Waterway. If it is not apparent that there will be no adverse impacts upon the Intracoastal Waterway, the item shall be referred to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council for review and mediation as needed until such time as the Palm Beach County Interlocal Plan Amendment Review Committee expands its review authority to this kind of Development Order " 3. Location= Pg. III-F-20, Policy A-4.1 Policy A-4.1: The need for additional water dependent uses in the area shall be addressed to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council ~lili~dd~6~. If needs in addition to those identified in the City's Plan are identified, a - siting program should be requested of the Council ¢~ddddd~. (c13) 4. Location: Pg. III-F-21, Policy B-1.4 Policy B-1.4: Whenever development is proposed east of Highway A-1-A a survey of the property shall be required. Said survey shall identify any public access to lands seaward of the moan high tide or water line by prescription, proscriptive easement, or any other legal means or a surveyor's note that no such access exists. No Page 11 ; such access shall be eliminated or replaced except in compliance with F.S. 161.55(6).A~ gg~ Section 4.5.5(c)] Location: Pg. III-F-28, Policy D-I.1 Policy D-i.I: Appendix I, Hurricane Evacuation; to Annex V, Evacuation, (III-L) of Palm Beach County's Peacetime Emergency Plan and its attendant recommendations for hazard mitigation and interagency hazard mitigation reports is hereby adopted by the City of Delray Beach and the Coordinator of Emergency Services M~X% is directed to provide for the effective implementation and coordination required by those recommendations. (c3) 6. Location: Pg. III-F-29, Policy D-1.2 Policy D-1.2: The Fire Chief shall annually review the City's Emergency Operations Guide ~ddtddd~ ~l~td~f~dd tXddl to insure that base data is current and to insure that it is consistent with the Palm Beach County Peacetime Emergency Plan. (c4) 7. Location: Pg. III-F-30, Policy D-4.1 Policy D-4.1: That consistent with Goal Area "E" of the Public Facilities Element, and more specifically with Objective E-l, the following drainage improvements shall have high priority: · the one block area south of Atlantic Avenue ad,scent to the Atlantic Avenue Bridge. · Atlantic Avenue at Oleason, Venetian, and Seabreeze Avenues. FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-G-2, Inventory Upon adoption of this Comprehensive Plan, the City's "reserve annexation area" will become replaced by the boundaries of it's official "Planning Area". This area is shown on the maps contained in this Element and is generally described by the following boundaries: · the Atlantic Ocean on the east; · the Town of Highland Beach and the City of Boca Ratont and unincorporated Palm Beach Count¥~ along the L-38 and C-15 canals~, on the south; · the Town of Gulfstream and tho City of Bo~nton Beach on the north; · the E-3 Canal (one-half ~~~ mile west of Military Trail) on the west with exceptions of territory which is developed and served by County 'Utility System 93. 2. Location: Pg. III-G-5, Table L-1 Table L-1 Existing Land Use Inventory~ Category Acres % of Total Residential 4,206 42.2 Commercial 786 7.9 Industrial 257 2.6 Agricultural 39! 3.9 Transportation 1,401 Recreation/Conservation 1,752 17.6 Educational/Public Buildings/ Groultds/Other Public Facilities 286 2.9 Vacant 878 8.8 ToJ~ 9,959 acres ~00.0 15.56 square miles~ ~ Includes City, unincorporated pockets and reserve planning area ~ This net area excludes acreage devoted to the Intracoastal Waterway, 1-95, Lake Ida, and makes allowances for excessive right-of-way of major arterial roadways Source: City o~'Delra¥ Beach, 1994 Page 13 3. Location: Pg. III-G-9, Figure L-4 This figure, "Major Residential Parcels", has been replaced with a new figure, "Potential Residential Units", 9rovide up to date (1994) information. SEE FIGURE L-4 ON PAGE 15 4. Location: Pg. III-G-10, Table L-3 5. Location: Pg. III-G-10, Table L-4 ,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ////////// ''"~'"''''",,,, , · ,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ////////// ,,,'''''''''",,,, .................. X Zl3 d~f ~'~}~' ~3Z .................. · ,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,********, //,,,,,,,/~/////// ///////////////////////////////// '"',"", ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ~EE TABLE L-4 ON PAGE 16 Page ~4 'FIGURE H-1 ._ ,..~ i ZI( ! ~. ~-~ ~ NOTE: ~ USE DESIGNAIIONS OUTSIDE THE CI~ ~E ~VISORY. M PO~~ RES~OE~ I I ffi I I I " Page 15 -- TABLE H-2 AND TABLE L-4 -- POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS FEBRUARY 1994 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 97.41 ..... 1,169.0 i25 MIXED USE SAD 10.54 126.5 142 MIXED USE ' CNTY 94.82 680.0 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 105.36 ..... 806.5 102 RURAL RESIDENTIAL CNTY 107.01 535.1 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 107.01 ..... 535.1 106 TRANSITIONAL CNTY 8.38 100.6 111 TRANSITIONAL CNTY 8.32 99.8 113 TRANSXTXONAL Ch"fY 17.56 210.7 114 TRANSITIONAL A 6.21 74 . S 123 TRANSITIONAL POC 7 · 15 85.8 127 TRANSITIONAL RM 6.12 73.4 139 TRANSITIONAL POC 18.83 262 . 0 143 TRANSITIONAL A 33 · 97 407 . 5 146 TRANSXTIONAI, CNTY 52 · 18 626 . 2 147 TBANBXTXONAL POC 10.00 120.0 ~T~ FOR DESIGNATION .................. 168.7:2 ..... 2,060.6 122 ~VIOUS APPROVAL RM-8 18.56 140.0 150 PREVIOUS APPROVAL PRD 0.00 138.0 151 PREVIOUS APPROVAL PRD 0.00 114 . 0 152 PREVIOUS APPROVAL SAD 0.00 292 . 0 153 PREVIOUS APPROVAL RM 0 o 00 1 § 8 . 0 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 18 . 56 ..... $ 42 . 0 GRAND TOTAL.: ...................... . .... $73.45 ..... 5,79§.2 NOTE: LAND USE DESIGNATIONS OUTSIDE THE CITY ARE ADVISORY. SOURCE: CITY OF DELRAy BEACH, 1994. Pase 16 6. Location: Pg. III-G-33, Policy C-4.3 Policy C-4.3 A special CBD development plan shall be developed Jointly by the CRA and the City. It shall be initiated subsequent to completion of the Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Plan (see Policy C-2.4). It shall address the maximum development which can be accommodated in a competitive market while still retaining the "village like, community by-the-sea" character of the CBD. It shall further identify the Infrastructure requirements, including parking, which will be needed to accommodate such an intensity of development. Such a plan shall be formally processed as an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. The plan shall be instituted under the lead of the Community Redevelopment Agency eZ~/d ~ldIHZdd Bdpdt~ddi~ but conducted through close participation with the City's Planning Department 7. Location= Pg. III-G-33, Policy C-4.6 8. Location: Pg. III-G-33, Policy C-4.9 Policy C-4.9 The following capital Improvements have already been identified as essential components of efforts and programs which are necessary to keep the CBD a vital and competitive commercial marketplace. These are considered as shoL~c term (first planning period FY 90/91 to FY 95/96) capital improvements which should be a par~ of any general obligation bond program which ~1 created. ~Z~d~dZX Ldd~ Kd~dltZddiZ ~Zddd~t · Phase zz! of At2antic Avenue Beautification I.e. expansion of the , beautification program east of the bridge to the Ocean Page 17 · Reconstruction of N.E. 7th Avenue CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-H-18, Policy A-I.1 Policy A-I.1 The need~ for a new park in the Southwest portion of the City ddd dd ~lg~Z~ FZ~ S~~ shall be addressed ~d~d concurrent with, or prior to, the development of Blood's Hammock Grove. 2. Location: Pg. III-H-24, Policy A-3.10 Page 19 INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-I-19, Policy A-2.3 Policy A-2.3 Any conflicts emanating from Policy A-2.1 ~Z~Z and which are not resolved prior to resubmission to D.C.A. shall be taken to the Palm Beach Countywide Coordination Program and/or the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council as appropriate, ~d~ for direction and/or mediation. (c2) REQUIREMENTS FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IMPLEMENTATION 1. Location: Pg'. IV-12, Five Year Capital Improvement Schedule Table IV-3, the Five Year Capital Improvement Schedule for Projects ~ $100,000, has been revised to reflect the City's Five Year Capital Improvement Plan. SEE TABLE IV-3 ON PAGES 22 AND 23 Page 21 TABLE IV-3 FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT · $100,000 I PROJECT & FUND . I FY 1994-95 J FY 1995-96 J FY 1996-97 ! FY 1997-98 WA TER/SEWER . NEW CAPtTAL OUTLAY WATER MAIN/LINE EXTENSIONS 0 75.000 0 200,000 200,000 SEWER MAIN/LINE EXTENSIONS 0 75,000 0 200.000 200.0(X) OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 100.000 100,000 100,000 200t000 200,000 OTHER'MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 100,000 100,000 100,000 150.000 150.000 FIRE STATION NO.3 WATER & SEWER 65,000 0 0 0 0 SLUDGE HANDLING SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 125.0(X) 0 0 0 0 BOYNTON BEACH INTERCONNECT & PUMPSTATION 100,000 0 400t000 0 0 ' VAC-CON TRUCK (NEW) 0 0 150~000 0 0 BRANDON DRIVE (WATER & SEWER) 0 210~0(X) 0 0 0 ~ILVER TERRACE (WATER & SEWER) 0 200,0(X) 0 0 0 GREENBRIAR DR. (WATER & SEWER) 135,000 0 0 0 O WATER DISTRIBUTION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 200.000 200,000 200,000 200~000 LIFT STATION CONVERSION TO SUBMERSIBLE 60~000 140~000 140~(X~0 1 MANHOLE REHABILITATION PROGRAM 550,000 550~000 550,000 EAST AREA RD. RECONSTRUGTION WATER/SEWER UPGRADES 220,600 0 0 0 0 WATER PLANT MEDIA REPLAGEMENT 250,000 0 0 0 0 BULK AGID STRIPPING TOWER MEDIA REPLACEMENT 0 200~(X~0 0 0 0 INTRAGOASTAL CROSSING REPLAGEMENTS 200.000 200,000 2007000 50~(~0 0 EAST DR~E (LOWER¥ TO A~T~C) ~ ~ 5.00O 0 0 0 0 TOTALS I $~.S~,e001 $~,2~0.000 I Si,Om,Om I GENERAL CONSTRUCTION FUND STREET RESURFAClNG/REGONSTRUCTION 75,000 100~000 250~000 300.000 350.000 GENERAL TRAFFIC/ALLEY WAY IMPROVMENTS 20.000 31,000 50.0(~0 50,000 50.000 N.E. 4TH STREET (SWINTON TO NE. 2ND ST.) 120.000 0 0 0 0 SGHOOL SITE "S' ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 150,000 0 0 0 0 EAST LAKE IDA BEAUTIFICATION 124,000 0 0 0 0 BEAUTIFIGATION-ClTY ATTORNEY PROPERTY 0 0 51,000 0 0 POMPEY PARK POOL 170.0(X) 0 0 0 0 BUILDING RENEWAL & REPLACEMENT 75,000 60,000 77,000 100,000 100,000 EQUIPMENT RENEWAL & REPLACEMENT 75,000 50~000 77,000 100t000 100,000 GITY HALIJPLOIGE HURRIGANE SHUTTERS 0 0 250~000 0 0 SILVER TERRACE PAVING/DRAINAGE 0 300.000 0 0 0 GITY SEAWALL CONSTRUGTION PROGRAM 204.000 204,000 0 0 0 SANDOWAY LIFEGUARD BUILDING 225~000 0 0 0 0 BEAUtifiCATiON (ATt.~nc TO ArA) ~00,000 0 0 0 0 TOTALS · I $2'~'000 I $7SS,0~0 I $75~.000 I Page 22 TABLE IV-3 FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT · $10.0,000 [ PROJECT & FUND J FY 1994-95 I FY 1995-96 J FY 1996-97 I FY 1997-98 I FY 1998-99~I IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS 0 100,000 0 0 0 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 0 0 0 0 100,(X30 PROJECTS LESS THAN $100,00D 115.000 65,000 115.000 115,000 95,0[X) TOTALS I $115000 [ $165.000 [ $115000 J $115,000 I '$195,000 I DECADE OF EXCELLENCE I1,, Flee ADMINISTRATION 375.800 0 0 0 0 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS 275.100 0 0 0 0 N.W. ORAINAGE (PHASE II) 175.000 0 0 0 STREET RECONSTRUCTION (PHASE II} 617.900 0 0 0 0 S.W. 10TH STREET 1~317,800 0 0 0 0 BEAUTIFICATION - W. ATLANTIC -> 1-95 TO MILITARY 186.100 0 0 0 0 BEAUTIFICATION- ATLANTIC E. TO OCEAN 800~000 0 0 0 0 TOTALS I S,3,747,.7D0 J SO ! SO I $0 I SO SEA TURTLE CONSERVATION pROGRAM 12.000 12.0(X) 14(300 14.000 I 14 000 SERVEY% DUNE MANAGEMENTI OTHER 135 000 75000 75 000 75,000 ] 7%000 TOTAL I $'/47.000 ! $87.000 I ~.000 I ~89,000 I $8g,000 CEMETARY CEMETARY EXPANSION 0 [ 0 J 0 { 0 I 0 TOTALS '1 SO !,,. SO I SO I SO I SO I V,E.,CLE REPLACEME.T PRO~.AM I 5~.~0 i 5~,~ I ~0.000 I ~O,0OO i 5~,000 I I TOTALS ..... ! S550~ ! SSSO.000 I 55~ 000 ! SSSO,~ I SS~O,000 I ~9.~ w~s /~Ev~/y. ue eONO S.W. STORAGE TANK LAND 77.100 0 0 0 N.E. STORAGE TANKS (ATLANT~ H.$.) 1 .:~7 ~O0 0 0 0 WATER MAIN- BARWlCK ROAD 123.458 0 0 0 WATER MAIN- LAKE IDA ROAD 192.700 0 0 0 0 WATER MAIN- ANDREWS AVENUE ~.700 0 0 0 0 WATER MAIN- N.E. 3RD AVENUE ,, B4 200 0 O 0 0 WATER MAIN- N. BARWlC, ,K ROAD ~.100 0 0 0 WATER MAIN - RIDGEWOOO ROAO 206300 0 0 0 0 MORIKAMI WELLS (B~r PIPING 2.114.100 0 0 01 0 N. RESERVOIR HIGH SERVICE PUMI~ 292.~'~30 0 0 O. 0 .TOTALS I 54.9257~! SOl SOl SO I SO w4 rER~Se"wr~ ~ CO~L~Cf/O~ FEES MOR~MI "R~ W~9_~. ~NG 40~ 0~0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL SITE T .... ~ IM4N 225 000 0 0 0 0 SOUTHWEST S ~ 28.000 5430 0~ -- 500.000 500,000 500 000 SCHOOL SITE'S'. _v~l~rlinm 2~o ooo o o o o TOTALS I S~ 000 ! SS00---~- I -'~ 0001 STORMWATER UTILITY FEE ATLANTIC AVENUE PUMP STAi-K~N 1~3 O00 0 0 0 0 BEACH DRIVE PUMP STATION 113 000 0 0 0 0 HARBOR DRIVE PUMP STATION 0 101 .__r~D_ 0 0 0 SEASAGE DRIVE PUMP STATION 0 164.__r~_ 0 0 0 S.W. lOTH ST. (DIXIE & SWINTON) 0 lO0.--n~~- 0 O 0 LINOELL BLVD. (FED. HWY. TO [NX~. HWY.2 0 0 231.000 0 0 G. BUSH BLVD. (FED. HWY. TO INTRACOASTAL} 0 0 180.400 0 0 SW lOTH ST MAIN TRUNK (CONGRES~ TO FED HWY) 65 000 0 500,000 1 TOTALS ; !. $3~ Om I $~5.0eO ! S;~ ~00 I' $~.--~J~O,O00 I $900,000 ?aSe 23 ~ PROCEDURES -FOR MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF THE PLAN 1. Location: Pg. V-l, Implementation of goals, objectives, and policies of the elements of the plan Z~XfX~d dd Z~d ~Z¢~ ~dd~ ~ dddt~dd~d dd d~6d Fiscal Year 91/92 1. Creation of "scenic street" program T B-3.2 2. Llndell & Federal Highway Redevelopment Plan LU C-2.6 & H B-3.1 3. Enhanced street marking program T C-2.1 4. Review of-street names a system T B-2.2 5. Congested intersection inventory & program T B-2.1 6. west Atlantic Redevelopment Plan LU C-2.4 & H B-3.1 7. Germantown Road Redevelopment Plan LU C-2.5 & H B-3.1 8. In-town shuttle, program development T A-1.3 & Beach shuttle transportation program eSR B-3.1 and CM B-I.1 9. Resolve FIND property status/disposition CM & 4.2 10. Com~unity Residential Home amendment to the LDR's LU A-5.11 11.Neighborhood Information Exchange Program H A-1 Zl/ WdZZfZdZd ~t~d~gZd~ dX~dddZd~ gd ZI d~ddd~ Page 24 Fiscal~Year 92/93 1. East of Woods of Southridge Redevelopment Plan H B-3.1 2. Study re ways to accommodate staffing increases. PFD-3.1 3. Silver Terrace Redevelopment Plan LU C-2.7 4. Report re mitigation of impacts of point source pollution PF A-1 5. Report re mitigation impacts of non-point source pollution PF A-2 6. Public information exhibits PF F-! 7. Pole & obstruction removal program T C-2.2 8. C.B.D. Development Plan LU C-4.3 9. Sewer Master Plan, revisions & update PFC-! 10. Enhanced Code Enforcement Program powers H A-5.3 11. "Rehabilitation Strategy" Program development H B-2.3 12. Seawall ordinance review and modification CM D-4.2 13. Housing revolvingloan fund program development H A-5.1 14. Report re,collection and disposal of "wastes" PF A-3 15. Snorkel Park Study CM C-6.4 Discharge in waterways ordinance C C-2.2 & C C-2.1 re program for termination of a/c discharge 17. Post disaster redevelopment program preparation CM D-3 18. Pineapple Grove neighborhood plan LU C-4.8 t9. Complete Tennis Center LU C-3.6 20. Drainage Master Plan PF E-I.! 21. Amend CBD zone district to accommodate 30 DU/Ac LU A-5.13 22. Amend CBD zone district to accommodate industrial and commerce uses LU A-5.14 Zl~ddd~Ad ~dd~iM dd~dZd~dd fd~ g~d ~dddgdz"~' dXl~ddd~dd~ tt Zgl ~¢i~d tfdX¢d ~d Zidd fdt ~tddd~d~ ddZZ~fdZd ~ Page 25 r Fiscal Year 93/94 1. Assessment of user fees OSR A-3.2 2. Llnton/S.W. 4th Avenue Redevelopment Plan LU C-2.8a and H B-3.1 3. Redevelopment Plan, area south of the CBD H B-3.1 & LUC 2.9 4. Assessment of environmental impact of concrete plants C A-3.4 5. Intracoastal Shoreline Protection Program C 8-3.3 6. Commence annexation program LU B-3.4 7. Feasibility study for wastewater effluent reuse by groundwater recharge PF B-2.1 & C A-4.Tb Fiscal Year 94/95 1. Leon Weekes Interpretive Trail C B-I.3 Fiscal Year 95/96 1. Evaluation and Appraisal Report Y ~ \DOC\ADOP94-! MEMQRANDU~ TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER ~ SUBJECT: ~ DATE: NOVEMBER 11, 1994 This is second reading and public hearing for Ordinance No. 90-94 which adopts Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1, as modified in response to the Objections, Recommendations and Comments (ORC) report from the Department of Community Affairs. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this item on October 17, 1994, and voted unanimously to recommend that Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1 be adopted, subject to the following: (1) Modify the objectives and policies as detailed in the Response to ORC Report. (2) Modify the Five Year Schedule of Improvements to reflect the adopted Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The attached exhibit reflects the Planning and Zoning Board's recommendation. At first reading on November 1, 1994, the City Commission passed Ordinance No. 90-94 by unanimous vote. Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 90-94 adopting Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1 on second and final reading. ref:agmemol! CITY COMMISSION DOCUMENTATION TO: David T. Harden, City Manager THRU: Di mlnguez, or of Planning and Zoning FROM: John Walker, Project Coordinator~~ ~~_~/,7 // SUBJECT: MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15, 1994 ~ ADOPTION OF PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1, PUBLIC HEARING ACTION REQUESTED OF THE CITY COMMISSION: The action requested of the City Commission is that of holding the required public hearing and adopting Plan Amendment 94-1. BACKGROUND: First reading of the adoption ordinance occurred on November 1, 1994. At that time, complete background material and documentation was provided along with an analysis. Attached to this documentation is the adoption ordinance and its exhibit. The exhibit contains only the specific changes to the Comprehensive Plan. The changes are shown through underlining of new material and strike through of material which is deleted. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION: The attached exhibit reflects the previous recommendation made by the Planning and Zoning board. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, after a public hearing, adopt Plan Amendment 94-1. Attachments: *Ordinance # 90-94 with exhibit T:\advanced\ORC5.DOC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1 CONSERVATION ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-A-13, Policy A-1.4 (NEW) Policy A-1.4 The City shall encourage the preservation of existing groundwater recharge areas through sensitive site planning, including maximizing open spaced pretreatment of stormwater runoff~ etc. In the case of environmentally sensitive lands~ such preservation may include development under "planned development" concepts, exaction (public sites dedication provisions of the Land Development Regulations), or acquisition (including the County Environmentally Sensitive Lands Acquisition Program). 2. Location: Pg. III-A-15, Policy A-4.2 Z~f~ ~I~Z~ m~ f~Z~ (Deleted by Amendment 94-1) 3. Location: Pg. III-A-15, Policy A-4.6 Policy A-4.6 Water which flows in canals or drainage lakes shall be used wherever possible for irrigation of golf courses and open space areas. The possibility of such water use shall be explored during the review of any development plans which are in proximity of such a water source. This submittal requirement shall be included in the required updating of land use regulations which follows adoption of the Plan. (cl) 4. Location: Pg. III-A-16, Policy A-4.7a and Policy A-47b Policy A-4.7a The City shall continue its present policy of requiring a water source, other than City water, for irrigation purposes in geographically defined areas of the City. Policy A-4.7b The City, through the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Board, shall implement the "Northeast Quadrant Reclaimed Water System" project to reclaim a portion of the effluent from the Wastewater Treatment Plant for irrigation purposes. The City, through the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Board, shall also explore the feasibility of the reuse of wastewater effluent for groundwater recharge in FY 93/94. Based upon the results of this feasibility study, the City, through the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Board, may develop a program to fully implement the reclamation and reuse of sewage wastewater effluent in the future. (Also see Public Facilities Policy B-2.1 for related policy) ~ ~ ~~ Z~ ~ ~f 5. Location: Pg. III-A-17, Policy B-1.2 Policy B-1.2 The Delray Oaks area of the Alfieri Pugliese Park of Commerce shall be preserved .through sensitive development under "planned development" concepts, exaction (public sites dedication provisions of the Land Development Regulations), or acquisition (including the County Environmentally Sensitive Lands Acquisition Program). The City shall participate with the County in seeking State funding for the acquisition of the Delray Oaks site and its development as a preservation area. ~M~ Hurricane Pines along S.W. 10th Street should be preserved in part through sensitive site planning. 6. Location: Pg. III-A-17, Policy B-1.4 7. Location: Pg. III-A-17, Objective B-2 Objective B-2: To increase public awareness and provide for the protection of flora, fauna, and wildlife through programs of education and regulation. Regulatory measures shall ensure the protection, preservation~ conservation, and appropriate use and protection of fisheries, wildlife and marine habitats which serve as habitat for endangered and threatened plant and animal species. 8. Location: Pg. III-A-18, Policy B-3.2 Policy B-3.2 ~¢~ ~ I~¢g ~ g~ ~ llfi~l The City supports Palm Beach County's program to restore and protect the shoreline of Lake Ida. In addition, the City supports continuinq monitorinq of boatinq activity in the lake to assure that this activity does not produce adverse impacts on the shoreline. Pag® 3 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-B-22, Policy A-1.2 Policy A-1.2 Even though current standards for ocean discharge of effluent are being met, the use of ocean discharge may not, in the long term, be an acceptable method of disposal for all, or even the majority, of effluent. A program to fully implement the reclamation and reuse of sewage effluent may be developed by the City, through the Wastewater Treatment Facility Board~ in the future. This program would continue the use of ocean discharger on a limited basis~ to dispose of excess effluent, especially during the rainy season. 2. Location: Pg. III-B-25, Policy B-2.1 Policy B-2.1 ~¢~I¢~I ~Z~ The City~ through the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Board~ shall develop a program to implement the "Northeast Quadrant Reclaimed Water System" project to reclaim a portion of the effluent from the Wastewater Treatment Plant for irrigation purposes. The City, through the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Board~ shall also explore the feasibility of the reuse of wastewater effluent for groundwater recharge in FY 93/94. Based upon the results of this feasibility study~ the City, through the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Boardf may develop a program to fully implement the reclamation and reuse of sewage wastewater effluent in the o future. (Also see Conservation Policy A-4.7b for related policy) 3. Location: Pg. IIIkB-25,'pOlicy B-2.5 (New) Policy B-2.5 The City shall develop a program to oonstruct at least one Aquifer Storage and Page 4 Recovery (ASR) well to supplement water supply durinq conditions of drought or well field contamination and as a method of balancinq the demand on water supply wells durinq periods of hiqh and low demand. This program shall include feasibility studies~ design~ and construction as warranted by the results of the feasibility studies. 4. Location: Pg. III-B-25, Policy B-3.1 Policy B-3.1 The City shall maintain its program of responsible consumption of water (per capita basis) and shall decrease the overall per capita consumption of water by 10% from 1989 levels through continued implementation of the following techniques and programs: (Also see Objective A-4 of the Conservation Element). · maintaining its water rate structure which establishes an inverted block rate structure to set higher consumption rates for increased water ~fZ~ ~~ in order to promote reductions in water consumption as well as establishment of conservation surcharges, based on South Florida Water Management District formulae, and keyed to various levels of drought alert; · mandatory use of wells for irrigation purposes where conditions permit [LDR Section 7.7]; · continued ~~ enforcement of water use laws; · The consideration of ~~Z~ f~ xeriscape landscaping alternatives ~ M~ MMM~fM~ for all new development during the review of site and development plans [LDR Section . 4.6.16(E)]; and · continuation of the regular preventive maintenance program for water mains, pumps and meters (see related Policy C-4.3) Page OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-D-21, Policy B-2.5 (NEW) Pol%cy B-2.5 The City shall ensure that public access is provided to publicly owned natural areas that provide passive resource based facilities (i.e. trailsd wildlife observation areas, etc.) for the public use and enjoyment of the site. For the Delray Oaks sited access to be provided by the County will include public parkinq. 2. Location: Pg. III-D-21, Policy B-2.6 (NEW) Policy B-2.6 The City shall ensure that passive resource based facilities (i.e. trailsd wildlife observation areas, etc.) will be provided for the public use and enloyment of publicly owned natural areas. For the Delray Oaks sited facilities to be provided by the County will include a trail and informational display. Page HOUSING ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-E-6, Figure H-1 This figure, "Major Residential Parcels", has been replaced with a new figure, "Potential Residential Units", to provide up to date (1994) information. SEE FIGURE H-1 ON PAGE 8 2. Location: Pg. III-E-7, Table H-1 Page ? FIGURE H-1 FIGURE L-4 '! ® NOTE: LAND USE DESIGNATIONS OUTSIDE THE CITY ARE ADVISORY. N POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS ~ A,C,G'REC, A1~ PARCELS Of' La,qB, W¥1ICH ..I~RE VA~.ANT OR UNDE:RDL~YL'LDP~. 4.5 AC~ OR GRf..A"~ IN S~ZE., AND HAV~ A F.LU.M. DI~C;NA11ON Of' LO~ D~STTY, IJ,E~U~ D~, TRANSZl'IOI~L, MPA'ED US~, OR RURAL RESIDENTIAL c~ o¢ om.~'r eru~c~. FL .... PLANNING DEJ3ARTUENT IIrGE3~IO: ~ ~ : . .._ _ , ~ Page 8 3. Location: Pg. III-E-7, Table H-2 llllll IIIIIIIII llllllllllllllll llllllllll, lllllllllllllll, lll tliiii IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIII111~IIIIII IIIIIIII '111111 IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ,,,,,,,,,,"''"''" llllllllllllllllll, '1111,,,,,,,,''IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII '''''''''' IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII SEE TABLE H-2 ON PAGE 10 4. Location: Pg. III-E-18, Policy A-1.4 Policy A-1.4: That these neighborhoods be identified as "stable residential" on the Housing Map, that the most restrictive residential zoning district which is applicable is affixed on the zoning map, and that requests for rezoning to a different zone designation, other than Community Facilities and Open Space be denied. 5. Location: Pg. III-E-19, Policy A-2.4. Policy A-2.4: That these neighborhoods be identified as "stable residential" on the Housing Map, that the most restrictive residential zoning district which is applicable is affixed on the zoning map, and that requests for rezoning to a different zone designation, other than Community Facilities and Open Space be denied. Page 9 ~- TABLE H-2 AND TABLE L-~ -- POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS FEBRUARY 1994 CURRENT POTENTIAL ID, I DESIGNATION I ZONING ! ACRES I UNITS 101 LOW DENSITY R1AA 10.00 50.0 103 LOW DENSITY PRD 5.00 25.0 110 LOW DENSITY CNTY 20.32 101.6 124 LOW DENSITY SAD 31.08 155.4 128 LOW DENSITY R'iA 9.99 50.0 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 76.39 ..... 382.0 104 MEDIUM DENSITY CNTY 4.94 59.3 105 MEDIUM DENSITY CNTY 6.47 77.6 107 MEDIUM DENSITY CNTY 14.23 170.8 116 MEDIUM DENSITY RM 20.18 242.2 117 MEDIUM DENSITY RR 14.79 177.5 118 MEDIUM DENSITY CF 36.80 441.6 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 97.41 ..... 1,169.0 125 MIXED USE SAD 10.54 126.5 142 MIXED USE CNTY 94.82 680.0 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 105.36 ..... 806.5 102 RURAL RESIDENTIAL CNTY 107.01 535.1 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 107.01 ..... 535.1 106 TRANSITIONAL CNTY 8.38 100.6 111 TRkNSITIONAL CNTY 8.32 99.8 113 TR~SITIONAL CNTY 17.56 210.7 114 TRANSITIONAL. A 6.21 74.5 123 TRANSITIONAL POC 7.15 85.8 127 TRANSITIONAL RM 6.12 73.4 139 TRANSITIONAL POC 18.83 262.0 143 TRANSITIONAL A 33.97 407.6 146 TRANSITIONAL CNTY 52.18 626.2 147 TRANSITIONAL POC 10.00 120.0 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 168.72 ..... 2,060.6 122 PREVIOUS APPROVAL RM-8 18.56 140.0 150 PREVIOUS APPROVAL PRD 0.00 138.0 151 PREVIOUS APPROVAL PR/) 0.00 114.0 152 PREVIOUS APPROVAL SAD 0.00 292.0 153 PREVIOUS APPROVAL RM 0.00 158.0 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 18.56 ..... 842.0 GRAND TOTAl. ............................ 573.45 ..... 5,795.2 NOTE: LAND USE DESIGNATIONS OUTSIDE THE CITY ARE ADVISORY. SOURCE: CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, 1994. Page 10 COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-F-9, second bullet under Hurricane Evacuation · Within this area there is a population of approximately 7353 ~Z (1990 19~ Census Tracts 64, 7401, 7402~ 54.03). 2. Location: Pg. III-F-19, Policy A-2.3 Policy A-2.3: The City shall request of the City of Boynton Beach, the Town of Gulfstream, the Town of Highland Beach, and Boca Raton that notice be given of any development which shall impact the Intracoastal Waterway by diversion of runoff, the increase in direct runoff, or the introduction of a water-dependent use or commercial or industrial use along the Intracoastal Waterway. If it is not apparent that there will be no adverse impacts upon the Intracoastal Waterway, the item shall be referred to the Treasure Coast Reqional Planninq Council for review and mediation as needed until such time as the Palm Beach County Interlocal Plan Amendment Review Committee expands its review authority to this kind of Development Order 3. Location: Pg. III-F-20, Policy A-4.1 Policy A-4.1: The need for additional water dependent uses in the area shall be addressed to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council ~~. If needs in addition to those identified in the City's Plan are identified, a siting program should be requested of the Council ¢~f~. (c13) 4. Location: Pg. III-F-21, Policy B-1.4 Policy B-1.4: Whenever development is proposed east of Highway A-1-A a survey of the property shall be required. Said survey shall identify any public access to lands seaward of the mean high tide or water line by prescription, prescriptive easement, or any other legal means or a surveyor's note that no such access exists. No Page 11 such access shall be eliminated or replaced except in compliance with F.S. 161.55(6)..~ ~ ~m~~ ~Z~ F~ ~~ (c9) [LDR Section 4.5.5(c)] 5. Location: Pg. III-F-28, Policy D-i.1 Policy D-i.i: Appendix I, Hurricane Evacuation; to Annex V, Evacuation, (III-L) of Palm Beach County's Peacetime Emergency Plan and its attendant recommendations for hazard mitigation and interagency hazard mitigation reports is hereby adopted by the City of Delray Beach and the Coordinator of Emerqency Services ~ ~~I~ is directed to provide for the effective implementation and coordination required by those recommendations. (c3) 6. Location: Pg. III-F-29, Policy D-1.2 Policy D-1.2: The Fire Chief shall annually review the City's Emerqency Operations Guide g~~ ~gf~ ~I~I to insure that base data is current and to insure that it is consistent with the Palm Beach County Peacetime Emergency Plan. (c4) 7. Location: Pg. III-F-30, Policy D-4.1 Policy D-4.1: That consistent with Goal Area "E" of the Public Facilities Element, and more specifically with Objective E-l, the following drainage improvements shall have high priority: · the one block area south of Atlantic Avenue adjacent to the Atlantic Avenue Bridge. · Atlantic Avenue at Gleason, Venetian, and Seabreeze Avenues. Page 12 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-G-2, Inventory Upon adoption of this Comprehensive Plan, the City's "reserve annexation area" will become replaced by the boundaries of it's official "Planning Area". This area is shown on the maps contained in this Element and is generally described by the following boundaries: · the Atlantic Ocean on the east; · the Town of Highland Beach and the City of Boca Raton, and unincorporated Palm Beach County, alonq the L-38 and C-15 canals~ on the south; · the Town of Gulfstream and the City of Boynton Beach on the north; · the E-3 Canal (one-half ~~~ mile west of Military Trail) on the west with exceptions of territory which is developed and served by County Utility System #3. 2. Location: Pg. III-G-5, Table L-1 Table L-! Existing Land Use Inventory~ Category Acres % of Total Residential 4,206 42.2 Commercial 786 7.9 Industrial 257 2.6 Agricultural 391 3.9 Transportation 1,401 14.1 Recreation/Conservation 1,752 17.6 Educational/Public Buildings/ Grounds/Other Public Facilities 286 2.9 Vacant 878 8.8 Total 9,959 acres 100.0 15.56 square miles2 ~ Includes City, unincorporated pockets and reserve · planning area 2 This net area excludes acreage devoted to the Intracoastal Waterway, 1-95, Lake Ida, and makes allowances for excessive right-of-way of major arterial roadways Source: City of Delray Beach, 1994 Page 13 3. Location: Pg. III-G-9, Figure L-4 This figure, "Major Residential Parcels", has been replaced with a new figure, "Potential Residential Units", to provide up to date (1994) information. SEE FIGURE L-4 ON PAGE 15 4. Location: Pg. III-G-10, Table L-3 5. Location: .Pg. III-G-10, Table L-4 IIIIII '"'"'" 7/////////////// "''''"" /////////11/////// ,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, //7//77///~//////////77/7///i ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~,~ 7/7////,~////////// ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' // ///// //////////'''''''' · ~EE TABLE L-4 ON ~AGE ~6 Page 14 NOTE: L~h~ US~ DESIGNATIONS OHTSIDE THE N PO~~L RESIDE~ UNES ~~.~ . I , ,I -- TABLE H-2 Ah-D TABLE L-4 -- POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS FEBRUARY 1994 CURRENT POTENTIAL [ ID' I DESIGNATION I ZONING I ACRES I UNITS 101 LOW DENSITY R1AA 10.00 50.0 103 LOW DENSITY PRD 5.00 25.0 110 LOW DENSITY CNTY 20.32 101.6 I24 LOW DENSITY SAD 31.08 155.4 128 LOW DENSITY R'IA 9.99 50.0 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 76.39 ..... 382.0 104 MEDIUM DENSITY CNTY 4.94 59.3 105 MEDIUM DENSITY CNTY 6.47 77.6 107 MEDIUM DENSITY CNTY 14.23 170.8 116 MEDIUM DENSITY RM 20.18 242.2 117 MEDIUM DENSITY RR 14.79 177.5 118 MEDIUM DENSITY CF 36.80 441.6 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 97.41 ..... 1,169.0 125 MIXED USE SAD 10.5~ 126.5 142 MIXED USE CNTY 94.82 680.0 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 105.36 ..... 806.5 102 RURAL RESIDENTIAL CNTY 107.0! 535.1 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 107.01 ..... 535.1 106 TRANSITIONAL CNTY 8.38 100.6 111 TRANSITIONAL CNTY 8.32 99.8 113 TRANSITIONAL CNTY 17.56 210.7 114 TRANSITIONAL A 6.21 74.5 123 TRANSITIONAL POC 7.15 85.8 127 TRANSITIONAL RM 6.19- 73.4 139 TRANSITIONAL POC 18.83 262.0 143 TRANSITIONAL A 33.97 407.6 146 TRANSITIONAL CNTY 52.18 626.2 14 ? TRANSITIONAL POC 10.00 120.0 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 168.72 ..... 2,060.6 122 PREVIOUS APPROVAL RM-8 18.56 140.0 150 PREVIOUS APPROVAL PRD 0.00 138.0 151 PREVIOUS APPROVAL PRD 0.00 114.0 152 PREVIOUS APPROVAL SAD 0.00 292.0 153 PREVIOUS APPROVAL RM 0.00 158.0 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 18.56 ..... 842.0 GRAND TOTAL ............................ 573.45 ..... 5,795.2 NOTE: LAND USE DESIGNATIONS OUTSIDE THE CITY ARE ADVISORY. SOURCE: CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, 1994. Page 16 6. Location: Pg. III-G-33, Policy C-4.3 Policy C-4.3 A special CBD development plan shall be developed jointly by the CRA and the City. It shall be initiated subsequent to completion of the Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Plan (see Policy C-2.4). It shall address the maximum development which can be accommodated in a competitive market while still retaining the "village like, community by-the-sea" character of the CBD. It shall further identify the infrastructure requirements, including parking, which will be needed to accommodate such an intensity of development. Such a plan shall be formally processed as an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. The plan shall be instituted under the lead of the Community Redevelopment Agency ~Z~;~ ~fifi~fi~ ~~fiZ but conducted through close participation with the City's Planning Department ~t~fi~Z~ ~~~fiZ 7. Location: Pg. III-G-33, Policy C-4.6 8. Location: Pg. III-G-33, Policy C-4.9 Policy C-4.9 The following capital improvements have already been identified as essential components of efforts and programs which are necessary to keep the CBD a vital and competitive commercial marketplace. These are considered as short term (first. planning period FY 90/91 to FY 95/96) capital improvements which should be a part of any general obligation bond program which is created. · Phase III of' Atlantic Avenue Beautification i.e. expansion of the beautification program east of the bridge to the Ocean Page 17 · Reconstruction of N.E. 7th Avenue CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-H-18, Policy A-i.1 Policy. A-i.1 The need~ for a new park in the Southwest portion of the City ~M~ ~M ~~M~fM~ F~ SZ~ shall be addressed ~~ concurrent with, or prior to, the development of Blood's Hammock Grove. 2. Location: Pg. III-H-24, Policy A-3.10 Page 19 INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-I-19, Policy A-2.3 Policy A-2.3 Any conflicts emanating from Policy A-2.1 ~Z and which are not resolved prior to resubmission to D.C.A. shall be taken to the Palm Beach Countywide Coordination Proqram and/or the Treasure Coast Reqional Planninq Council as appropriate, ~ ~ ~Z~ ~~ ~MZ~ for direction and/or mediation. (c2) Page 20 REQUIREMENTS FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IMPLEMENTATION 1. Location: Pg. IV-12, Five Year Capital Improvement Schedule Table IV-3, the Five Year Capital Improvement Schedule for Projects > $100,000, has been revised to reflect the City's Five Year Capital Improvement Plan. SEE TABLE IV-3 ON PAGES 22 AND 23 Page 21 TABLE IV-3 FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT > $100,000 WA TER/SEWER ' NEW CAPrrAL OUTLAY WATER MAIN/LINE EXTENSIO,NS 0 75~000 0 200~000 200,000 SEWER MAJN/LINE EXTENSIONS 0 . 75,000 0 200~000 200,000 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS .100,000 100,000 100,000 200~000 200,000 OTHER MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 100,000 100,000 100,000 150,000 150,.000 FIRE STATION NO.3 WATER & SEWER 65,000 0 0 0 0 SLUDGE HANDLING SYSTEM'iMI~'ROVEMENTS 125.000 0 0 0 0 BOYNTON BEACH INTERCONNECT & PUMPSTATION 100,000 0 400,000 0 0 VAC-CON TRUCK (NEW) 0 0 150~000 0 0 BRANDON DRIVE 0NATER & SEWER) 0 210,000 0 0 0 SILVER TERRACE (WATER & SEWER) 0 2q0. ,000 0 0 0 ~REENSRIAR DR. (VVATER & SEWER) ~,000 0 0 0 0 TOTALS I ~'~,0001,,, S7~0000I $750,0001 $~,000 I $750,= WATER DISTRIBUTION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 200,000 200.000 200,000 200,(XX) 200,000 UFT STATION CONVERSI~)N"TO SUBMERSIBLE 60,000 140,000 140~000 140,000 140~000. MANHOLE REHABILITATION PROGRAM 550,000 5501000 550,000 550,0(X) EAST AREA RD. RECONSTRUCTION WATER/SEWER UPGRADES 220,600 0 0 0 0 WATER PLANT MEDIA REPLACEMENT 250,(X~ 0 0 0 0 BULK ACID STRIPPING TOWER MEDIA REPLACEMENT 0 200,000 0 0 0 INTRACOASTAL CROSSING REPLACEMENTS 200,000 200.000 200.000 50°000 0 EAST DRIVE (LOWERY TO ATLANTIC) 115~000 0 0 0 0 TOTALS I $1~595,6~0. J $1,290~000 J $1.0907(XX) J $940,000 I $890,000 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION STREET RESURFAClNGIRECONSTRUCTION 75,000 100,000 250,(X~0 300,000 350,000 GENERAL TRAFFIC/ALLEY WAY IMPROVMENTS 20.000 31,000 50,000 50,000 50,0(X) N:.E. 4TH STREET (SWINTON TO N.E. 2ND ST.) 120,000 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL SITE'S' ROAD IMPROVEME, NTS 150~000 0 0 0 0 EAST LAKE IDA BEAUTIFICATION 124,000 0 0 0 0 BEAUTIFICATION-CITY ATTORNEY PROPERTy 0 0 51.000 0 0 POMPEY PARK POOL 170,000 0 0 0 0 BUILDING RENEWAL & REPLACEMENT 75,0(X) 60.000 77,000 100.000 EQUIPMENT RENEWAL & REPLACEMENT 75 0OO 50,000 77,000 100,000 100,000 CITY HALIJPLOICE HURRICANE SMUTrERS 0 0 250,000 0 0 SILVER TERRACE PAVING/DRNNAGE 0 300,000 0 0 0 CiTY S .E~WALL CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 204,000 204,000 0 0 0 SANDOWAY LIFEGUARD BUILDING 225~000 0 0 0 0 ~.EAUT;F~CAT~ON (ATLANT;C TO Al^) ~0.000 0 0 0 0 YbTALS I $2,~.0m [. $?r~,oooI $75~,000J ~.~0,000 I $600~000 Page 22 TABLE IV-3 FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJEcT ~' $10,0,000 I PROJECT & FUND I FY 1994-95 I FY 1995-96 I FY 199t%97 I FY 1997-98 (FY 1998-99 MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS 0 I 100,000 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 0 I" o I o I o t ~oo,ooo PROJECTS LESS THAN $100,000 ' 115,0(30 I . 65,000 I . 115,000 .J .. . 1!5,000 ! 95,000 TOTALS I $115,00p. 1. .. $165,000 I ' S115.000 ] .$11..5,000 I . $195,000 DECADE OF EXCELLENCE II FIRE ADMII~iSTRATION 375,800 0 0 ' 0 0 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROV. EMENTS 275.1.00 O 0 .. .0 0 N.W.. DRAINAGE (PHASE II) 175.000 0 0 O 0 STREET RECONSTRUCTION (PHASE II} .. 617,900 0 0 0 0 S.W. 10TH STREET. 1~317~800 0 0 O 0 BEAUTIFICATION - W. ATLANTIC -> 1-95 TO MILITARY 186.100 0 0 0 0 BEAUTIFICATION - ATLANTIC E. TO OCEAN 800,000 0 0 0 0 TOTALS .,,I :$3.747.700 ! BEA CH RES TORA TION SERVEYS, DUNE MANAGEMENT~ OTHER 135.000 75,000 75~000 75,000 75,0(30 TOTALI $~47.ooo ! ~7,oool ~89.ooo I .9,ooo I . ~.~,o~o I CEMETARY CEMETARY EXPANSION 0 I 0 TOTALS I ~0 I VEH.!CLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 550,000 ] 550,000 I 550,000 ] 550,000 ! 650,000 ITM I s550.ooo ! , s55o,oool ss~o.ooo I ss~o,ooo I ~55o,ooo, fg93 W&S ~EVENUE BOND S.W. STORAGE TANK LAND 77.100 O, 0 0 .N.E. STORAGE TANKS (ATLANTIC H.S.} 1.367.500 0 0 0 0 WATER MAIN ,~ BARWICK ROAD ,, 123,4,56 0 0 0 0 WATER MAIN: LAKE IDA ROAD 192~700 O 0~ 01 Ol WATER MAIN - ANDREWS AVENUE 409.700 O, 0, 0 0 WATER MAIN - N.E. 3RD AVENUE B4:200 0 0 0 0 WATER MAIN- N. MARWICK ROAD 88~100 . 0 O 0 0 WATER MAIN - RIDGEWOOD ROAD 206,300 O. 0~ 0 0 MORIKAMI WELLS (6)~ PIPING 2,114.100 O 0 0 0 N. RESERVOIR HIGH SERVI.CE PUMP., 262,600 0 0 01 0 ToTA~.s [ S4~925.756 I $0 ! $0 I $0 I $O WA TER/$EWER FUND CONNECTION FEES MORIKAMI PRODUCTION WELLS, PIPING 406.000 0 0 ' 0 O SCHOOL SITE "S" LIFT__STATION/FORCE MAIN 225:000 0 0 0 0 SOUTHWEST STORAGE TANK [R~[SERVE} 28.000 5(30,..000 500.000 500,000 500,000 SCHOOL SITE "S' WATER MAIN 250.000 0 0 0 0 TOTAL,S !s.~.ooo ! s.~o.ooo I ~. ~ooo ! STORMWATER UTILITY FEE ATLANTIC AVENUE PUMP STATION 'i63,000 0 0 0 0 BEACH D ,RIVE PUMP STATION 113.000 0 0 0 0 HARBOR DRIVE PUMP STATION 0 101~000 0 0 0 SEASAGE DRIVE PUMP STATION 0 164,0OO O 0 O S.W. lOTH ST. (DIXIE & SWlNTON;I 0 100,000 0 0 0 LINDELL BLVD. {FED. HWY. TO DIXIE HVVY.). 0 0 231.000 0 0 G. BUSH BLVD. (FED. HWY. TO INTRACOASTAL) 0 0 180.400 0 0 SW 10TH ST MAIN TRUNK (CONGRESS TO FED HVV~ 65,000 0 500,000 1,000,000 9(X],0OO TOTALS I ~.ooo !.. $3~.ooo ! s~.4oo I' s~,ooo,ooo I $~oo,ooo Page 23 PROCEDURES FOR MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF THE PLAN 1. Location: Pg. V-I, Implementation of goals, objectives, and policies of the elements of the plan Fiscal Year 91/92 1. Creation of "scenic street" program T B-3.2 2. Lindell & Federal Highway Redevelopment Plan LU C-2.6 & H B-3.1 3. Enhanced street marking program T C-2.l 4. Review of street names & system T B-2.2 5. Congested intersection inventory & program T B-2.1 6. West Atlantic Redevelopment Plan LU C-2.4 & H B-3.1 7. Germantown Road Redevelopment Plan LU C-2.5 & H B-3.1 8. In-town shuttle, program development T A-1.3 & Beach shuttle transportation program OSR B-3.1 .and CM B-I.1 9. Resolve FIND property status/disposition CM ~ 4.2 10. Community Residential Home amendment to the LDR's LU A-§. 11 11. Neighborhood Information Exchange Program H A-1 Page 24 Fiscal Year 92/93 1. East of Woods of Southridge Redevelopment Plan H B-3.1 2. Study re ways to accommodate staffing increases. PF D-3.1 3. Silver Terrace Redevelopment Plan LU C-2.7 4. Report re mitigation of impacts of point source pollution PF A-1 5. Report re mitigation impacts of non-point source pollution PF A-2 6. Public information exhibits PF F-1 7. Pole & obstruction removal program T C-2.2 8. C.B.D. Development Plan LU C-4.3 9. Sewer Master Plan, revisions & update PF C-1 10. Enhanced Code Enforcement Program powers H A-5.3 11. "Rehabilitation Strategy" Program development H B-2.3 12. Seawall ordinance review and modification CM D-4.2 13. Housing revolving loan fund program development H A-5.1 14. Report re collection and disposal of "wastes" PF A-3 15. Snorkel Park Study CM C-6.4 16. Discharge in waterways ordinance C C-2.2 & C C-2.1 re program for termination of a/c discharge 17. Post disaster redevelopment program preparation CM D-3 18. Pineapple Grove neighborhood plan LU C-4.8 19. Complete Tennis Center LU C-3.6 20. Drainage Master Plan PF E-i.1 21. Amend CBD zone district to accommodate 30 DU/Ac LU A-5.13 22. Amend CBD zone district to accommodate industrial and commerce uses LU A-5.14 I131 Page 25 Fiscal Year 93/94 1. Assessment of user fees OSR A-3.2 2. Linton/S.W. 4th Avenue Redevelopment Plan LU C-2.8a and H B-3.1 3. Redevelopment Plan, area south of the CBD H B-3.1 &LUC2.9 4. Assessment of environmental impact of concrete plants C A-3.4 5. Intracoastal Shoreline Protection Program C B-3.3 6. Commence annexation program LU B-3.4 7. Feasibility study for wastewater effluent reuse by groundwater recharge PF B-2.1 & C A-4.7b Fiscal Year 94/95 1. Leon Weekes Interpretive Trail C B-1.3 Fiscal Year 95/96 1. Evaluation and Appraisal Report Y: \DOC\ADOP94-1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT #94-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FLORIDA The City Commission of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, will consider Amendment #94-1 to the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. Amendment #94-1 consists of amendments to the goals, objectives and policies of individual elements based upon assessment of tasks accomplished, availability of resources, and new information. The TEXT AMENDMENTS address the following subject matter: (1) Amendments related to the preservation of the Delray Oaks ecosite, describing Palm Beach County's program to acquire the site and updating policies related to this subject, adding new policies to strengthen the Comprehensive Plan direction toward preservation of environmentally sensitive lands. (2) Amendments related to wastewater effluent reuse, describing the current program and updating policies related to this subject area. (3) Amendments related to the new water rate structure, describing the inverted block rate structure and updating policies related to this subject. (4) Other changes of a technical and clerical nature. (5) Updates to the status of a number of action policies. (6) Revisions to the Five Year Schedule of Improvements. The City Commission will conduct a Public Hearing on Comprehensive Plan Amendment #94-1 on TUESDA¥o NO~EMBER 15. 1994. AT 7:00 P.M. (or at any continuation of such meeting which is set by the Commission), in the Commission Chambers at City Hall, 100 N.W. 1st Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida. At this meeting the City Commission will accept public testimony and will consider the adoption of Comprehensive Plan Amendment #94-1. All interested citizens are invited to attend the public hearing and comment upon proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment #94-1 or submit their comments in writing on or before the date of this hearing to the Planning and Zoning Department. Copies of the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are available at the Delray Beach Planning and Zoning Department, City Hall, 100 N.W. 1st Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida 33444 (Phone 407/243-7040), between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE CITY COMMISSION WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS HEARING, SUCH PERSON WILL NEED A RECORD OF THESE PROCEEDINGS, AND FOR THIS PURPOSE SUCH PERSON MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. THE CITY DOES NOT PROVIDE NOR PREPARE SUCH RECORD. PURSUANT TO F.S. 286.0105. PUBLISH: Delray Beach News CITY OF DELRAY BEACH November 9, 1994 Alison MacGregor Harty City Clerk ********************************************************************** Instructions to Newspaper: This notice must be at least a one-quarter (1/4) page ad, with the headline (NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING / COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT #94-1 / CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA) to be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The ad is not to be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Thank you for your assistance. - 2 - MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER~TA/( SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # /~7' - MEETING OF NOVEMBER 1, 19~4 FIRST READING FOR ORDINANCE NO. 90-94/ADOPTION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1 DATE: OCTOBER 28, 1994 This is first reading for Ordinance No. 90-94 which adopts Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1, as modified in response to the Objections, Recommendations and Comments (ORC) report from the Department of Community Affairs. Please refer to staff documentation for an overview of the Response to ORC Report. The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed this item on October 17, 1994, and voted unanimously to recommend that Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1 be adopted, subject to the following: (1) Modify the objectives and policies as detailed in the Response to ORC Report. (2) Modify the Five Year Schedule of Improvements to reflect the adopted CIP. Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 90-94 on first reading. If passed, a public hearing will be scheduled for November 15, 1994. ref:agmemoll CITY COMMISSION DOCUMENTATION TO: DAVID T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER EC OR OF PLANNING AND ZONING THRU: FROM: JOHN WALKER, PROJECT COORDINATORy~~ SUBJECT: MEETING OF NOVEMBER 1, 1994 ADOPTION OF PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1~ FIRST READING ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION: The action requested of the Commission is that of approval on first reading of an ordinance adopting Plan Amendment 94-1. BACKGROUND: Plan Amendment 94-1 proposes changes to eight Comprehensive Plan elements and the Five Year Schedule of Improvements. Attached is the Planning and Zoning Board staff report of October 17th, which provides further information about the Amendment. The City Commission transmitted the proposed Amendment to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA), for mandatory review, by action on May 17, 1994. The review process has been completed and a report of Objections, Recommendations, and Comments (ORC) has been returned to the City. The ORC contains 13 objections, dealing with clarity of the proposed changes, lack of sufficient supporting data, and consistency with State and Regional goals and policies. The objections and recommended responses are addressed in the accompanying Planning and Zoning Board staff report (October 17th). PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION: The Planning and Zoning Board formally reviewed this item at its meeting of October 17, 1994. By unanimous vote, the Board recommended the following: That Plan Amendment 94-1 be modified as described below and adopted by the City Commission: 1. Modify the objectives and policies as detailed in the Response to ORC Report. City Commission Documentation Adoption of Plan Amendment 94-1, First Reading Page 2 2. Modify the Five Year Schedule of Improvements to reflect the adopted CIP. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, approve the adoption ordinance on first reading, with appropriate public hearing scheduled for November 15, 1994. Attachments: * Draft adoption ordinance * P&Z staff report and documentation of October 17, 1994 T: \advanced\ORC4 PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT MEETING OF: OCTOBER 17, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: VI.A. RESPONSE TO ORC, AMENDMENT 94-1 ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD.' The item before the Board is that of review of the proposed response to the Objections, Recommendations, and Comments (ORC) report. Associated with this review are proposed modifications to Plan Amendment 94-1. The action to be taken is in the form of a recommendation to the City Commission. BACKGROUND: Proposed Plan Amendment 94-1 was heard by the Planning and Zoning Board on April 18, 1994. It was transmitted to Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) by action of the City Commission on May 17, 1994. The DCA ORC Report was received on September 12, 1994. The Plan Amendment proposed changes to eight Comprehensive Plan elements, 29 policies, one objective, the Five Year Schedule of Improvements, and related background data. Refer to the Table of Contents within the Amendment (attached) for an outline of the items which were considered. The Board is to review the Response to ORC Report and the related modifications to Plan Amendment 94-1. The City Commission will then consider the Board's recommendation when it acts on the adoption ordinance. The ordinance will be before the City Commission for first reading on November lst; and, second reading (adoption) on November 15th. In addition to the above, it is appropriate to modify the Five Year Schedule of Capital Improvements to reflect the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). ANALYSIS: The OR'C Report contains 13 objections. The objections deal with the clarity of the intended changes, lack of sufficient supporti-ng data, and with consistency with Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) and State goals and policies. The attached Response to ORC is an analysis and recommended disposition for each of the objections. P & Z Board Memorandum Staff Report Response to ORC 94-1 Page 2 RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, accept the Response to ORC Report and recommend to the City Commission that Plan Amendment 94-1 be modified as described below and then adopted. 1. Modify the objectives and policies as detailed in the attached Response to ORC Report. 2. Modify the Five Year Schedule of Improvements to reflect' the adopted CIP. Attachments: * Plan Amendment 94-1 Transmittal * Response to ORC Report Objections * ORC Report * Revised Five Year Schedule of Improvements Report prepared by John Walker.~<~~Y~ Reviewed by Diane Dominguez ~![[~_~ T .- \advanced\ORC3 TABLE IV-3 FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT > $100,000 I PROJECT & FUND I FY ~99~95 I FY ~99~ I FY 1996-97 I FY 1997-98 I FY ~99~99 I WA TLR~SEWER. NEW CAPITAL OUTLAY WATER MAIN/LINE EXTENSIONS 0 75~000 0 200,000 200,000 SEWER MAIN/LINE EXTENSIONS 0 75~000 0 200,000 200.0(X) OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 100,000 100,000 100,000 200,000 200,000 OTHER MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 100,000 100,0(X) 100,000 150,000 150,000 FIRE STATION NO.3 WATER & SEWER 65~000 0 0 0 0 SLUDGE HANDLING SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 1251000 0 0 0 0 BOYNTON BEACH INTERCONNECT & PUMPSTATION 100,000 0 400,000 0 0 VAC-CON TRUCK (NEW) 0 0 150,0(X) 0 0 BRANDON DRIVE (WATER & SEWER) 0 210~000 0 0 , 0 SILVER TERRACE (WATER & SEWER) 0 200,000 0 0 0 GREENBRIAR DR. (WATER & SEWER) 135,000 0 0 0 0 TOTALS I S625,~ I $76°,°°° I $750,0001 $750,000 I $750.000 WATER/SEWER RENEWAL & REPLACEMENT WATER DISTRIBUTION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200.000 LIFT STATION CONVERSION TO SUBMERSIBLE 60,000 140~000 140~000 140,000 140.000 MANHOLE REHABILITATION PROGRAM 550,000 550~000 550,000 550,000 550,000 EAST AREA RD. RECONSTRUCTION WATER/SEWER UPGRADES 220,000 0 0 0 0 WAYF"I~ PLANT MEDIA REPLACEMENT 250,000 0 0 0 0 BULK ACID STRIPPING TOWER MEDIA REPLACEMENT 0 200,000 0 0 0 INTRACOASTAL CROSSING REPLACEMENTS 200~000 200~000 200,__nO0 50,000 0 EAST DRIVE (LOWERY TO ATLANTIC) 115~0(X) 0 0 0 0 TOTALSI $~,~,~1 s~,~o,o~1 ~,~,~l ~,~l ~,~ GENERAL CONSTRUCTION FUND STREET RESURFAClNG/RECONSTRUCTION 75,000 100,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 GENERAL TRAFFIC/ALLEY WAY IMPROVMENTS 20,000 31 ~000 50,000 50,000 50.000 N.E. 4TH STREET (SWINTON TO N.E. 2ND ST.) 120,000 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL SITE "S' ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 150,000 0 0 0 EAST LAKE IDA BEAUTIFICATION 124,000 0 0 0 0 BEAUTIFICATION-CITY ATTORNEY PROPERTY 0 0 51 ,__no0_ 0 0 POMPEY PARK POOL 170~000 0 0 0 0 BUILDING RENEWAL & REPLACEMENT 75,000 60~000 77,000 100,__n00 100,000 EQUIPMENT RENEWAL & REPLACEMENT 75,000 601000__ 77,000 100,__noo 100,000 CITY HALL/PLOICE HURRICANE SHLI~i I=RS 0 0 250,000 0 0 SILVER TERRACE PAVING/DRAINAGE 0 300,000 0 0 0 CITY SEAWALL CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 204,000 204,000 0 0 0 SANDOWAY LIFEGUARD BUILDING 7~,000 0 0 0 0 BEAUTIFICATION (ATLANTIC TO A1A) 900~000 0 0 0 0 TOTALS ! $2,'m~,~ I $7~,~ I $7~,~I ~r~) ~,~ TABLE IV-3 FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT · $100,000 PROJECT & FUND I FY 1994-95 I FY 1995-96 I FY 1996-97 I FY 1997-98 I FY 1998-99 I MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 0 0 0 0 100,000 PROJECTS LESS THAN $100,0(X) 115,0(X) 65,000 115,000 115,(XX) 95,000 TOTALS J $115,000 I $165,000 I $115.000 ] $115,000I $165,000 DECADE OF E)(CELLENCE II FIRE ADMINISTRATION 375,800 0 0 0 0 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS 275,100 0 0 0 0 N.W. ORAINAGE (PHASE II) 175,000 0 0 0 0 STREET RECONSTRUCTION (PHASE II) 617~900 0 0 0 0 S.W. lOTH STREET 1 ~317~800 0 0 0 0: BEAUTIFICATION - W. ATLANTIC -> 1-95 TO MILITARY 186~100 0 0 0 0 BEAUTIFICATION- ATLANTIC E. TO OCEAN 800,000 0 0 0 0 TOTALS J $3,747,700 J ~1 ~1 ~1 ~ BEACH RESTORATION SERVEYS, DUNE MANAGEMENT~ OTHER 135~000 75~000 75~000 75,000 75,000 TOTAL I $147,000 J SST,000I taS.000J ~e~,Oool , ~,ooo J CEMETARY I I CEMETARY EXPANSION J 0 J 0J 0J 0J 0 CITY GARAGE J VEHICLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 550,000 I 550,000 I 550,000 I 550,000 J 550,000 TOTALS I ~,0.000 I S.~,000 I~S50.000 I ~..~:,0,000 I S..~,000 f993 W&S REVENUE BOND S.W. STORAGE TANK LAND 77,100 0 0 0 0 N.E. STORAGE TANKS (ATLANTIC H.S.) 1,367,500 0 0 0 0 WATER MAIN - BARWlCK ROAD 123,456 0 0 0 0 WATER MAIN - LAKE IDA ROAD 192,700 0 0 0 0 WATER MAIN - ANDREWS AVENUE 409,700 0 0 0 0 WATER MAIN - N.E. 3RD AVENUE 84,200 0 0 0 0 WATER MAIN- N. BARWlCK ROAD 88~100 0 0 0 0 WATER MAIN - RIDGEWOOD ROAD 206,300 0 0 0 0 MORIKAMI WELLS (6), PIPING 2,114,100 0 0 0 0 N. RESERVOIR HIGH SERVICE PUMP 262,6(30 0 0 0 0 TOTALS I s4,s2s,756j so I sol sol so WA TLR~SEWER FUND CONNECTION FEES MORIKAMI PRODUCTION WELLS, PIPING 406,000 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL SITE'S' LIFT STATION/FORCE MAIN 225,0(30 0 0 0 0 SOUTHWEST STORAGE TANK (RESERVE) 28,000 500~000 500.000 500~000 500,000 SCHOOL SITE "S" WATER MAIN 250~000 0 0 0 0 TOTALS I ~o~,ooo I s~o,ooo I s~oo,~ t ~50o,ooo I ~oo,ooo STORMWATER UTILITY FEE ATLANTIC AVENUE PUMP STATION 163,000 0 0 0 0 BEACH DRIVE PUMP STATION 113~000 0 0 0 0 HARBOR DRIVE PUMP. STATION 0 101,000 0 0 0 SEASAGE DRIVE PUMP STATION 0 164,000 0 0 0 S.W. 10TH ST. (DIXIE & SWINTON) 0 100~000 0 0 0 LINDELL BLVD. (FED. HVVY. TO DIXIE HWY.) 0 0 231 ~000 0 0 G. BUSH BLVD. (FED. HWY. TO INTRACOASTAL) 0 0 180~400 0 0 SW 10TH ST MAIN TRUNK (CONGRESS TO FEO HWY) 65,000 0 500,000 1,000,000 900,000 TOTALS I $341,0~0 1 s3~,ooo I ~ ~,~01 $1,000,000 I s~oo,ooo PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1 RESPONSE TO OBJECTIONS OF THE ORC REPORT GENERAL: Plan Amendment 94-1 was heard by the Planning and Zoning Board on April 18, 1994. It was transmitted to DCA, by action of the City Commission, on May 17, 1994. The DCA Objections, Recommendations, and Comments (ORC) Report was received on September 12, 1994. Plan Amendment 94-1 proposed changes to eight Comprehensive Plan Elements, 29 Policies, one Objective, the Five Year Schedule of Improvements, and related background data. It contained no amendments to the Future Land Use Map. The ORC Report contains 13 objections. The objections deal with the clarity of the intended changes, lack of sufficient supporting data, and with consistency with TCRPC and State goals and policies. ORC OBJECTION #1: The City's proposed amendment to Conservation Element, Policy A-1.4 does not contain specific implementation activities, and the specific meaning of terms such as "sensitive site planning" is unclear. RESPONSE: The phrasing of this policy follows the needs of the Florida Communities Trust funding application, which is currently in process to provide funding for the purchase and preservation of the Delray Oaks Preserve. In order to clarify the meaning of the policy on a City-wide basis and identify implementation activities, the policy may be reworded as follows: Policy A-1.4 The City shall encourage the preservation of existing groundwater recharge areas through sensitive site planning~ including maximizing open spaced pretreatment of stormwater runoff~ etc. In the case of environmentally sensitive lands, such preservation may include ~~ development under "planned development" concepts, exaction (public sites dedication provisions of the Land Development Regulations), or acquisition (including the County Engironmentally Sensitive Lands Acquisition Program). Plan Amendment 94-1 Response to Objections of the ORC Report Page 2 ORC OBJECTION %2: The City's proposed amendment to Conservation Element, Policy B-2.6 does not set measurable standards for protection of habitat. RESPONSE: The five policies under Objective B-2 provide measurable standards for the protection of habitat. The proposed amendment should be made to Objective B-2 instead of adding a new policy. The amended Objective is as follows: Objective B-2: To increase public awareness and provide for the protection of flora, fauna, and wildlife through programs of education and regulation. Regulatory measures shall ensure the protection, preservation~ conservation and appropriate use and protection of fisheries~ wildlife and marine habitats which serve as habitat for endanqered and threatened plant and animal species. ORC OBJECTION #3: The City's proposed amendment to Conservation Element, Policy B-3.2 does not address the specific actions the City will take to protect the shoreline. RESPONSE: The amendment expresses support of the County's program to restore and protect the shoreline of Lake Ida. Supporting data transmitted to DCA did not clearly state that Lake Ida and Lake Ida Park are under the jurisdiction of the County, therefore, the City has no direct involvement in shoreline protection. With the addition of this clarifying information, no change is required to the proposed amendment. ORC OBJECTION #4: The City's proposed amendment to Public Facilities Element Policy A-1.2 does not justify the change in position relative to the use of the ocean outfall. Some of the terms used, such as "normal" are unclear. RESPONSE: Through this amendment, the City sought to recognize that, even with the implementation of effluent reuse, the ocean outfall would continue to function to dispose of excess Plan Amendment 94-1 Response to Objections of the ORC Report Page 3 wastewater effluent, particularly during the rainy season. To clarify the intent, a modification in the amendment is recommended as follows: Policy A-1.2 Even though current standards for ocean discharge are being met, the use of ocean discharge may not, in the long term, be an acceptable method of disposal for all, or even the majority, of effluent. A program to fully implement the reclamation and reuse of sewage effluent may be developed by the City, through the Wastewater Treatment Facility Board in the future. This program would continue the use of ocean discharge, on a limited basis, to dispose of excess effluent, especially durinq the rainy season. ORC OBJECTION #5: The City has not provided adequate data and analysis to support the City's change in position toward new wells. RESPONSE: Adoption of the amendment at this time is premature, leaving internal inconsistencies within the Plan. A complete review of the program for raw water supply is proposed in Plan Amendment 95-1 through an analysis of the Water Supply Master Plan. Therefore, the proposed amendment to this policy should not be adopted at this time. ORC OBJECTION #6: The City's proposed amendment to Open Space and Recreation Element, Policy B-2.5 does not identify specific implementation activities to ensure public access to publicly owned natural areas. RESPONSE: The phrasing of this policy follows the needs of the Florida Communities Trust funding application, which is currently in process to provide funding for the purchase and preservation of the Delray Oaks Preserve. In order to clarify the meaning of the policy and identify implementation activities, the policy may be reworded as follows: Policy B-2.5 The City shall ensure that public access is provided to publicly owned natural areas that provide passive resource based facilities (i.e. trails, wildlife observation areas, etc.), for the public use and enjoyment of the site. For the Delray Oaks site, access to be provided by the County will include public parkinq. Plan Amendment 94-1 Response to Objections of the ORC Report Page 4 ORC OBJECTION #7: The City's proposed amendment to Open Space and Recreation Element, Policy B-2.6 does not identify specific implementation activities to ensure provision of passive resource based facilities on publicly owned natural areas. RESPONSE: The phrasing of this policy follows the needs of the Florida Communities Trust funding application, which is currently in process to provide funding for the purchase and preservation of the Delray Oaks Preserve. In order to clarify the meaning of the policy and identify implementation activities, the policy may be reworded as follows: Policy B-2.6 The City shall ensure that passive resource based facilities (i.e. trails, wildlife observation areas, etc.) will be provided for the public use and enjoyment of publicly owned natural areas. For the Delray Oaks sitet facilities to be provided by the County will include a trail and informational display. ORC OBJECTION #8: The City's proposed amendment to Housing Element, Figure H-1 does not indicate that land use designations outside the City are advisory. RESPONSE: A footnote will be added to the figure stating that designations outside the city are advisory. ORC OBJECTION #9: The City's proposed amendment to Housing Element, Table H-2 does not indicate that land use designations outside the City are advisory. RESPONSE: 'A footnote will be added to the table stating that designations outside the city are advisory. ORC OBJECTION #10~ The City's proposed amendment to population data in the Coastal Management Element does not analyze the effect on hurricane evacuation. Plan Amendment 94-1 Response to Objections of the ORC Report Page 5 RESPONSE: Hurricane preparedness and evacuation planning throughout the County is provided under the auspices of the Palm Beach County Division of Emergency Management in close coopera- tion with municipalities. Evacuation capabilities have been assessed using 1993 population estimates. That agency has determined that evacuation times and capabilities in Delray Beach are adequate. Therefore, no change to the proposed amendment is required. This explanation will also satisfy the objections regarding consistency with the State' and Regional goals and policies. ORC OBJECTION #11: The City's proposed amendment to Coastal Management Element, Policy A-4.3 does not support the removal of the Beaches and Shores Council from the policy. RESPONSE: The DCA's reading of this policy is correct since there is a mention of ocean access. The amendment should not be adopted. ORC OBJECTION %12: The City's proposed amendment to Land Use Element, Figure L-1 does not indicate that land use designations outside the City are advisory. RESPONSE: A footnote will be added to the figure stating that designations outside the city are advisory. ORC OBJECTION #13: The City's proposed amendment to Land Use Element, Table L-4 does not indicate that land use designations outside the City are advisory. RESPONSE: A 'footnote will be added to the table stating that designations outside the city are advisory. T: \advanced\ORC2 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS FOR THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Amendment 941A S..ej~ t.e .tuber .9~.1994 t~v~smn ot t~esource Planning and Management Bureau of Local Planning This r~port is pr~pand pursuant to Rule 9J-Il.010 INTRODUCTION The following objections, recommendations and comments are based upon the Department's review of the City of Delray Beach proposed amendment to their comprehensive plan pursuant to s.163.3184, F.S. Objections relate to specific requirements of relevant portions of Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, and Chapter 163, Part II, F.S. Each objection includes a recommend- ation of one approach that might be taken to address the cited objection. Other approaches-may be more suitable in specific situations. Some of these objections may have initially been raised by one of the other external review agencies. If there is a difference between the Department's objection and the external agency advisory objection or comment, the Department's objection would take precedence. Each of these objections must be addressed by the local government and corrected when the amendment is resubmitted for our compliance review. Objections which are not addressed may result in a determination that the amendment is not in compli- ance. The Department may have raised an objection regarding missing data and analysis items which the local government considers not applicable to its amendment. If that 'is the case, a statement justifying its non-applicability pursuant to Rule 9J- 5.002(2), F.A.C., must be submitted. The Department will make a determination on the non-applicability of the requirement, and if the justification is sufficient, the objection will be considered addressed. The comments which follow the objections and recommendations section are advisory in nature. Comments will not form bases of a determination of non-compliance. They are included to call attention to items raised by our reviewers. The comments can be substantive, concerning planning principles, methodology or logic, as well as editorial in nature dealing with grammar, organization, mapping, and reader comprehension. Appended to the back of the Department's report are the comment letters from the other state review agencies and other agencies, organizations and individuals. These comments are advisory to the Department and may not form bases of Departmental objections unless they appear under the "Objections" heading in ~his report. Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report City of Delray Beach Amendment 94-1A &. OBJICTZONS/RBCOMMBND&TZON8 8ummar~ of Proposed ~uendment Backgro~d: ~Xs ~en~ent pro, sea ~e addition of Policy A-1.4 to encourage ~e prese~ation of gro~dwater recharge areas ~rough sensitive si~e planning. ~i8 poli~would be an imp~vement to ~e plan, ~cause it encourages ~e prese~ation of water recha~e areas. However, ~e poli~ does no~ identify a specific implementa~ion ac~ivity, and uses te~ for which the specific meaning is not clear, including Usensi~ive si~e planning" and "sensitive development." (~les 9J-5.005(6); 9J-5.006(3)(c); and 9J-11.006(3), F.A.C.) ae~nenda~ionz ~e Ci~M should revise ~he policy ~o i~en~i~y wha~ specific implemen~a~ion ac~ivi~y will be us~ ~o encourage ~e prese~a~ion o~ wa~er recharge areas; and ~e City should de~ine ~e ~ o~ ~sensi~ive si~e planninge and 'sensi~ive development' ~a~ will be used. Ba~kgroudt ~is ~en~en~ proposes ~o delete Poli~ A-4.2 which provides ~or ~e developmen~ o~ wa~er use s~an~ards an~ ra~es base~ on X~d uses. Ob~ec~io~t None 3. Polio~ ~-4.7: Background: This amendment proposes to revise policy A-4.7 into two policies. Policy A-4.Ta restates the City's intent to continue requiring certain areas of the City not to use City water for irrigation purposes. The remainder of policy A-4.7 would be deleted and replaced by policy A-4.Tb which updates the status and the City's future study pla~s for the use of reclaimed water. It also states that based on study results the City may develop a program to fully implement the reuse of sewage wastewater effluent. Ob~octionsz None 4. PolioT B-/.4t Backgroundt This amendment proposes to delete Policy B-1.4 which stated that the City would obtain the wetland area along 1-95 because the City has determined that it is a drainage ditch and the associated overbank, and not a mwetland habitat,m None $. Pol~o~ B-2.68 Backgroundz This amendment proposes the addition of Policy B-2.6 to protect, to the maximum extent feasible, the habitat of endangered and threatened plants and animals. ob~ec~ion~ The City's protection of endangered species habitat is a positive action and this policy would be an improvement to the plan. However, the policy does not set a specific measurable standard, and to the maximum extent feasible does not ensure the protection of endangered species. (Rules 9J-5.005(6); 9J- 5.006(3) (c) ; and 9J-11.006(3), F.A.C.) aeconendationz The City should revise the proposed policy so that the policy provides a specific measurable standard, such as, 'requiring that 25 percent of the habitat for endangered species will be preserved. 6, Polioy B-3.2: B&ckground~ This amendment proposes the rev£sion of policy B-3.2 to delete a connitment to protect the Lake Ida shoreline. The revised policy states that the City suppoL~cs ~he County's pro, ram to restore and protect the shoreline, and the continued County monitoring of boating activity on the lake to assure that it does not adversely impact ~he shoreline. Ob~eotiont The policy does not address what specific actions ~he City will take to protect the shoreline. (Rules 9J-5.005(6); 9J- 5.006(3)(c); and 9J-11.006(3), F.A.C.) Ro~ommendetionI The City should revise the policy to identify what specific actions the City will take to protect the shoreline. (Publ~o P&o~l~t~es Blement ]tmendments) 7. Polio7 B&okgroundt This amendment proposes to revise Policy A-1.2 to state that even though current ocean discharge standards for effluent are being met, u...ocean discharge may not, in the long term be an acceptable method for the normal disposal of all. or even ma49ritv, of effluent." and that a program for the reclamation and reuse of sewage effluent will bo developed. ObJect~on~ The City has not provided adequate data and analysis to support the change in position from ocean discharge not being an acceptable long term method for effluent disposal, to such disposal not being acceptable for the 'normal~ disposal of Wall, or even the majorityu of effluent; and the specific meaning of the tam #normal# and Ual1, or even the majority of# ~s not clear. (Rules 9J-5.005(2) (a); 9J-5.006(1) (b)2; 9J-5.006(2) (b); 9J-5.006(3) (b)4; 9J-5.012(3) (c)13; 9J-5.013(1) (a)l; and 9J- 11.006(3), F.A.C.) Reoonendation~ The City should include data and analysis to support the assertion that ocean discharge of sewage effluent may be acceptable if not used as a normal means of disposal, and clarify the specific meaning of the terms Unormal disposalu and #all, or even the majority# as used in the policy. 8. Ob~ectXYe Backgroundt The amendment proposes to revise Objective B-2 to include the development of new wells and other technologies for providing water to address salt water intrusion and drought conditions. Ob~eotiont The City has not provided adequate data and analysis reflecting a salt water intrusion problem and a shortage of public water as a result of drought and the impacts on facility planning to suppo~c the reversal in the City's policy toward new wells~ and the City did not include any mapping of potential future wellfield sites. (Rules 9J-5.005(2) (a); 9J-5.006(1) (b)1; 9J-5. 006 (2) (a) ; 9J-5.006(3) (b)4; 9J-11.011(1)(f); 9J-11.006(3), F.A.C.) Reoommendationz The City should provide data and analysis to support the need for new wells, and provide a map of potential future wellfield sites. Background ~ The amendment proposes the revision of Policy B-2.1 to update the City's future study plans for the use of reclaimed water, and states that based on study results the City may develop a program to fully implelent the reuse of sewage wastewater effluent. Ob~ections~ None 10. Polio~ B-2.SI B&okground~ The aRendment proposes the addition of Policy B-2.5 for the development of a program and feasibility studies for the #**.construction of at least one Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) well. w · Ob~ ectionsl None Comment ~ If,.based on the results of the feasibility study, the deteFnines that an ASR well will be constructed, funding should be provided~ a source identified, and the iRprovement should be scheduled in the capital Improvenent Element. B&ckgrou.uds The amendment proposes the revision of Policy B-3.1 to describe ~he new structure for water rates which #establishes an inverted block rate structure to set hiaher consumption rates for increased water use...;# to provide for continued enforcement Qf water use laws." and to allow for "The consideration of ~ landscaDina alternatives for all new developments durina review of site and development Dlans." Ob~eotionsl None The data and analysis indicates ~hat the City will have a conservation surcharge in times of drought. This information should be added to the proposed policy revision. (open Spaoe and Recreation Bloment ~mendnents) 12. Poli~ B-2.Ss Backgroundt This amendment proposes the addition of Policy B-2.5 whereby "The ¢i~¥ shall ensure public access to publicly owned natural areas that provide Dassive resource based facilities..." Ob~ection~ The policy does not identify a specific inplenentation activity for how the City will ensure public access to publicly owned natural areas with passive resource based facilities. (Rules 9J-5.005(6); 9J-5.006(3)(c); and 9J-11.006(3), F.A.C.) RocoBmend&tion= The City should revise the proposed policy to indicate what specific activity the City will use to ensure public access to publicly owned natural areas with passive resource based facilities. B&ekground~ This Amendment proposes the addition of Policy B-2.6 which states "The City shall ensure that Dassive resource based facilities (i.e. trails, wildlife observation ares. etc.~ will be provided for the public use and enjoyment of publicly 9wned natural areas". '5 Ob:~ sctiou ~ · he policy does not identify a specific implementation activity for how ~e City will ensure the p~ovision of passive ~esou~c~ based facilities fo~ p~licl~ o~ed natural a~eas. (Rules 9J-5.005(6); 9~-5.00~(3) (c); and 9~-1~.006(3), F.A.C.) ~co~~tion ~ ~e City should revise ~e proposed policy to indicate what s~cific activity ~e City will use to ensure ~e provision of passive reso~ce based facilities for p~licly o~ed natural areas, and provision should be made in the Capital Improv~en~ El~en~ for ~e ac~isition of such facilities. (Housing Blement amendaents) Baokgroundt This amendment proposes the revision of Map Figure H-1 (attachnent, p. 13) which currently reflects "Major Residential Parcels" wi~h a revised Map Figure H-1 (attachment, p. 14) which reflects "Potential Residential Units" Ob~ection~ These maps show land use designations for areas that are outside the City limits and the City does not indicate that designations for areas outside the City are for advisory purposes only. (Rules 9J-5.006(2)(a); 9J-11.006(3), F.A.C. and Section 163.3171 F.S.) Recommendation~ The City should indicate on the map that the land use designations for areas outside the City are for advisory purposes only. X$. Tables H-X and H-2 z Baokgroundt This amendment proposes the deletion of Table H-1 (attachment p. 15) which reflects "Ongoing Developments." and Table H-2 (attachment p. 16) which currently reflects "Available Land" and to replace them with revised Table H-2 (attachment p. 17) which reflects "Potential Residential Units." " 6 Ob~ sot:ion s The revised table shows land use designations for areas that are outside the City limits and does not indicate that designations for areas outside the City are for advisory purposes only. (Rules 9J-5.006(2) (a); 9J-11.006(3), F.A.C. and Section 163.3171 F.S.) Recommendation ~ The City should indicate on the table that the land use designations for areas outside the City are for advisory purposes only. 16 · P01'Iol~, &-L. · od Polio], &-2.4 ~ Baokgrounds This anendnent proposes to revise Policies A-1.4 and A-2.4 to include Open Space as a pernissible rezoning of areas identified on the Housing Hap as 'stable residential,u Ob~eotionst None (coastaX Nanaqement Bloment ~uend~ente) 17. Page XXX-P-19, Hllrrios~e Bva uation, Baokgroundt This ~en~ent proposes ~o revise ~e second bullet under Hurricane ~a~ation on page III-F-19 ~o reflec~ ~he 1990 Census population an~ tracts. Ob~ection~ There is no data and analysis of the inpacts on evacuation times as a resul~ of ~e population increase and to d~onstrate how the plan is nov consistent vi~ Objec~ive ~-2 to nalntain or reduce eva~a~ion 5. 0~2 (2) (e) ~, and (2)(b)7; and 9~-~.006(~)(b)4., and 5, and (~), F.A.C.) ~co~tXon~ ~e City should provide data and analysis of the impact of · the population increase on hurricane eye,etlon. If ~e analysis shows .an increase, ~e City should identify how they will offset ~is increase to be consistent wi~ the ~le 9J-5.012(3)(b)7., F.A.C., and ~e City's plan Objective D-2 to maintain or reduce eye,at,on times. Co~ent~ The change would create an £nternal inconsistency as the remainder of the plan has not been updated to reflect the 1990 Census. When the City submits their Evaluation and Appraisal Report amendments, all relevant areas of ~he plan should be revised to be consistent with the updated 1990 Census figures being included in the Coastal Management Element. 18. Poli~ A-4.3s B&okgroulldt This amendment proposes to revise Policy A-4.3 to delete the Palm Beach County Beaches and Shores Council as a participant in City programs related to the protection of various coastal resources identified in the policy, because the Council's jurisdiction is limited to areas seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line. The City has not provided adequate data and analysis to support the removal of the Palm Beach County Beaches and Shores Council from the participation process. The policy does not appear to limit issues to the Intracoastal #aterwa¥. In particular, access to the ocean is specifically mentioned, and the other issues addressed do not appear to be limited to the Intracoastal Waterway. (Rules 9J-5.005(2)(a); 9J-5.006(2)(a); 9J-5.006(3) (b)4; 9J-Il.011(1) (f); 9J-11.005(3), F.A.C.) Reoo~end&tion~ The City should include data and analysis to indicate why the Palm Beach County Beaches and Shores Council should not participate in the City programs related to the protection of coastal resources identified in the policy. (Future Land Use BlementAmendments) 19. page ~-~-2, ~nvsntory~ Bac~groundz This amendment proposes to correct an internal inconsistency by revising Inventory page III-G-2 to include 'unincor~orate~ Palm Beach County. alona the L-38 and C-15 canals within the .City's "reserve annexation area" In addition, the amendment would revise the location description of the E-3 Canal from being one-quarter mile west of Military Trail to being one-half mile west of Military Trail. ObJeotions~ None 20. ,i~ure L-4:. Background: This maend~ent proposes to revise Hap Fig~tre L-4. The exist£ng Figure L-4 (attachment p. 27) which reflects 'Halo= Res~den~a~ ParceZs" would be deleted and replaced wi~ ~e revised Hap F~=e L-4 (a~ac~en~ p. 28) which ~ef~ec~s "Potential Res~den~aZ Units" and has been u~a~ed ~o =e~lec~ ~994 ~nfo~a~on. Ob~eo~o~ ~ese ~ps show land use desi~a~ions for areas ~at are outside ~e City limits and ~e City d~s no~ indicate that desi~ations for areas outside ~e City are for adviso~ pu~oses only. (~les 9J-5.006(2)(a)~ 9J-11.006(3), F.A.C. and Section 163.3171 F.S.) ~co~en~ation~ ~e City should indicate on ~e map ~at ~e land use designations for areas outside the City are for adviso~ pu~oses only. 21. T~Io ~3 ~d T~lo ~is anen~en~ proposes =o delete T~le L-3 (a~ac~en~ 29) which reflects "Ongoing ~velopments" and T~le ~4 which reflects UAvaila~le ~ndu and replace them wi~ ~e revised Table L-4 (a~tac~en~ p. 31) which reflects WPo~en~al Reo~Uen~ial Units" and has been u~a~ed to reflect 1994 developmen= ~e revised t~le shows ~and use Uesi~a~ions for areas ~ha~ are outside the C~y limits and does no~ indicate Uesignations fo= areas outsiUe ~e C~ty are for aUYiso~ pu~oses only. (Rules 9J-5.006(2) (a); 9J-11.006(3), F.A.C. and 163.3171 F.S.) Roconen~tton: ~e City should indicate on the ~a~le tha~ the lanU use ,Uesi~na~ons fo= areas ou~siUe ~he City are for adviso~ pu~oses only. 22. Policy c-4.e~ This amendment proposes to delete policy C-4.6 which proposed 1=he development of "...a strate~ for attracting private and public educational institutions to the Pineapple Grove Area...~ ObJeotionsl None The City indicates that the specific program is no longer active, but ~hat economic development of the area is still an aim of the City and the CRA. The City should consider' revising the policy as opposed to eliminating it. B&okgrou~ This amendment proposes to revise Table IV-3 #Five Year Capital Xmprovement Schedule.~ The existing Table IV-3 (a~ac~en~ pp. 38-42) would be replaced wi~h ~he revised XV-3 (a~ac~en~ pp. 43-44) ~o reflec~ ~he City's Five ~ear Capital Xmprovemen~ Plan. Ob~e~ions~ None 24. ~ro~e~ures for Moni~oring ~a ~aluation ~ea~ea~ Backgro~ ~is ~en~en~ proposes ~he revision of ~he lis~ o~ t~=edia~e needs ~der A. Implementation o~ Goals, Objectives, and Policies of ~e Elements of ~he Plan~ ~o reflec~ "projects and pr~ra~ ~a~ have ~en comple~ed~ eliminated, o~ rescheduled in previous amen~en~s or in ~e curren~ amen~en~." Ob~e~ionsz None B. ~N~XB~Y ~ ~ 8T~TB ~MP~SX~ Ob~oo~Xoni The proposed te~ amen~ent to Page III-F-19 of the Coastal Management El~ent is not consistent with Goal 7 (~lic Safety), Policies_24 and 25; and Goal 20 Transpo~a~ion), Poli~ 9 of ~he State Compr~ensive Plan because ~e amen~en~ does no~ ade~ately plan for hurricane evacua~ion. The City should include data and analysis of the impact of the revised population figures on hurricane evacuation. C. CON~X~TKNCY WITH TH~ COMPP~HBNSXV~ lt~GXON~L POLICY PLAN The proposed text amendment to Page III-F-19 of the Coastal Management Element is not consistent with Goal 7.2.1 (Public Safety), Policy 7.2.1.2; and Goal 19.2.1 (Transportation), of the Treasure Coast Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan because the amendment does not adequately plan for hurricane evacuation and shelter. The City should include data and analysis of the impact of the revised population figures on hurricane evacuation. If the analysis shows an increase, the City should identify how they will offset the increase. ORDINANCE NO. 90-94 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, ADOPTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE "LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION ACT", FLORIDA STATUTES SECTIONS 163.3161 THROUGH 163.3243, INCLUSIVE; ALL AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" ENTITLED "COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1" AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE, A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Delray Beach exercised the authority granted pursuant to the provisions of Florida Statutes Sections 163.3161 through 163.3243, known as the "Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act"; and WHEREAS, via Ordinance No. 82-89, the City Commission adopted the document entitled "Comprehensive Plan - Delray Beach, Florida"; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board, as Local Planning Agency, did prepare an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan entitled "Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1"; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board, as Local Planning Agency, following due public notice, held a public hearing on April 18, 1994, in accordance with the requirements of the "Local Government Comprehensive Planning Development Regulation Act"; and and Land WHEREAS, after the above referenced public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Board, as Local Planning Agency, recommended to the City Commission that the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1 be transmitted; and WHEREAS, proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1 was submitted to and reviewed by the City Commission; and WHEREAS, following due public notice, the first of two required public hearings on Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1 was held by the City Commission on May 17, 1994, at which time it was authorized to be transmitted to the Department of Community Affairs for required review; and WHEREAS, a report of Objections, Recommendations and Comments (ORC) has been received from the State Department of Community Affairs and said report has been reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Board, as Local Planning Agency, and is the basis for modifications to the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1; and WHEREAS, following due public notice, the second of two required public hearings on Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1 was held on November 15, 1994, in accordance with statutory requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: ~ That the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, hereby declares its intent to exercise the authority granted pursuant to the provisions of Florida Statutes Sections 163.3161 through 163.3243, inclusive, known as the "Local Government Planning and Land Development Regulation Act". Section 2. That in implementation of its declared intent as set forth in Section I of this ordinance, there is hereby adopted the document entitled "Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1", which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3. That the document entitled "Comprehensive Plan - Delray Beach, Florida" is hereby amended pursuant to the document entitled "Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1" ~ That should any section or provision of this ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence or word be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. ~_~ That all ordinances or parts of ordinances which are in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. ~ That this ordinance shall become effective upon issuance of a final order determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Florida Statutes Section 163.3184(9), by the State. Department of Community Affairs, or until the Administration Commission issues a final order determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Florida Statutes Section 163.3184(10). - 2 - Ord. No. 90-94 PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final reading on this the day of , 1994. MAYOR ATTEST: City Clerk First Reading Second Reading - 3 - Ord. No. 90-94 TABLE OF CONTENTS CITY OF DELRAY BEACH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1 PAGE CONSERVATION ELEMENT 1 Policy A-1.4 (preservation of recharge areas) i Policy A-4.2 (water conservation) i Policy A-4.6 (canal water for irrigation) 2 Policy A-4.7 ("grey water" for irrigation) 3 Policy B-1.2 (preservation of key parcels) 3 Policy B-1.4 (wetland area along 1-95) 4 Policy B-2.6 (preservation of habitat) 4 Policy B-3.2 (Lake Ida shoreline) PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT 6 Policy A-1.2 (ocean discharge) 6 Obje~tive B-2 (water supply) 7 Policy B-2.1 (WWTP effluent recycling) 8 Policy B-2.5 (aquifer storage and recovery) 8 Policy B-3.1 (techniques to decrease water consumption) OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION ELEMENT 11 Policy B-2.5 (access to natural areas) 11 Policy B-2.6 (facilities in natural areas) HOUSING ELEMENT 12 Figure H-1 (major residential parcels) Table H-1 (on-going developments) 16 Table H-2 (available land) 18 Policy A-1.4 (sacred zoning) 18 Policy A-2.4 (sacred zoning) COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT 19 Coastal area population 19 Policy A-2.3 (multiJurisdictional impacts on ICWW) 20 Policy A-4.1 (additional water dependent uses) 20 Policy A-4.3 (program implementation participation) 21 Policy B-1.4 (beach access) 21 Policy D-1.1 (hazard mitigation) 22 Policy D-1.2 (hurricane operations plan) 22 Policy D-4.1 (drainage improvements) FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT 24 Description of Planning Area 25 Table L-1 (existing land use inventory) 27 Figure L-4 (major residential parcels) 29 Table L-3 (on-going developments) 29 Table L-4 (available land) 32 Policy C-4.3 (CBD development plan) 32 Policy C-~..6 (educational institutions in Pineapple Grove) 33 Policy C-4.9 (capital improvement projects) PAGE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT 35 Policy A-i.1 (park and fire station in S.W.) 35 Policy A-3.10 (water and sewer enterprise bond) INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT 36 Policy A-2.3 (resolution of conflicts) REQUIREMENTS FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IMPLEMENTATION 37 Five year schedule of improvements PROCEDURES FOR MONITORING AND EVALUATION 45 List of projects/programs SUPPORT DOCUMENTS Appendix 1 Delray Oaks 2 Water Rates 3 Wastewater Effluent Reuse 4 Emergency Management T: \advanced\contents PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1 CONSERVATION ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-A-13, Policy A-1.4 (NEW) Change: ADDITION Policy A-1.4 The City shall encourage the preservation of existinq groundwater recharqe areas through sensitive site planninq. In the case of environmentally sensitive landst such preservation may include sensitive development under "planned development" concepts~ exaction (public sites dedication provisions of the Land Development Requlations)t or acguisition (including the County Environmentally Sensitive Lands Acguisition Program). Comment: Policy strengthens the City's commitment to preserve existing groundwater recharge areas. See Support Document # 1 (Delray Oaks) for a complete discussion of this issue. 2. Location= Pg. III-A-15, Policy A-4.2 Policy A-4.2 Develop a standard of water use for various land uses (e.g. var~ing with lot sizes, bedrooms, common area, etc.) which equates to 110% of a reduction target and establish it as the limit of "reasonable" consumption. Then provide for a penalty payment (higher rate) for water consumption above the reasonable amount. This program shall be instituted in FY 92/93, if the rate of water consumption is not reduced through voluntary means. (cl) Change= DELETION Comment= See Support Document # 2 (Water Rates) for a complete discussion of this issue. o 3. Location= Pg. III-A-15, Policy A-4.6 Policy A-4.6 Water which flows in canals shall be used wherever possible for irrigation of golf courses and open space areas. The possibility of such water use shall be explored during the review of any development plans which are in proximity of such a water source. This submittal requirement shall be included in the required updating of land use regulations which follows adoption of the Plan. (cl) Change: REVISION Policy A-4.6 Water which flows in canals or drainage lakes shall be used wherever possible. for irrigation of golf courses and open space areas. The possibility of such water use shall be explored during the review of any development plans which are in proximity of such a water source. This submittal requirement shall be' included in the required updating of land use regulations which follows adoption of the Plan. (cl) Comment: This requirement has been expanded to include all surface water bodies to better describe the intent of the policy. 4. Location: Pg. III-A-16, Policy A-4.7 Policy A-4.? The City shall continue its present policy of requiring a water source, other than City water, for irrigation purposes in geographically defined areas of the City. The City 'shall also pursue the use of discharge water, from the Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, for irrigation purposes. This program shall be explored through the Joint efforts of the District Board and the Cities of Boynton Beach and Delray Beach. This item is in the Regional Board FY 92/93 work program. Change: REVISION Policy A-4.7a The City shall continue its present policy of requiring a water source, other than City water, for irrigation purposes in geographically defined areas of the City. Policy A-4.Tb The Cltyt through the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Board; shall implement the "Northeast Quadrant Reclaimed Water System" Dro~ect to reclaim a portion of the effluent from the Wastewater Treatment Plant for irrigation purposes. The City; through the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Boardt shall also explore the feasibility of the reuse of wastewater effluent for groundwater recharge in FY 93/94. Based upon the results of this feasibility studyt the City; through the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Board, may develop Page a program to fully implement the reclamation and reuse of sewage wastewater effluent in the future. (Also see Public Facilities Policy B-2.1 for related policy) ~XZ ~Z~ ~~ K~ ~ ~f · Comment: The policy is updated to reflect on-going project,.. development and separated into a maintenance policy and a project specific policy. See Support Document # 3 (Wastewater Effluent Reuse) for a complete discussion of this issue. 5. Location: Pg. III-A-17, Policy B-1.2 Policy B-1.2 The Delray Oaks area of the Alfieri Pugliese Park of Commerce and Hurricane Pines along S.W. 10th Street should be preserved in part through sensitive site planning. Change: REVISION Policy B-1.2 The Delray Oaks area of the Alfiert Pugliese Park of Commerce shall be preserved through sensitive development under "planned development" concepts~ exaction (public sites dedication provisions of the Land Development Regulations)~ or acquisition (including the county Environmentally Sensitive Lands Acquisition Program). The City shall participate with the County in seekinq State funding for the acquisition of the Delray Oaks site and its development as a preservation area. ~d Hurricane Pines along S.W. 10th Street should be preserved in part through sensitive-site planning. Comment: It is appropriate to strengthen this policy relating to the preservation of the Delray Oaks site in light of on-going partnership efforts by the City and County to acquire and preserve the site. These efforts include applications for State funding through Preservation 2900 and the on going negotiations by the County to purchase the site through the Environmentally Sensitive La~ds Acquisition Program. See Support Document # 1 (Delray Oaks) for a complete discussion of this issue. 6. Location: Pg. III-A-17, Policy B'l.4 Pol16¥ B-1.'4 Upon adoption of this Plan and through programs set forth in the Page 3 Intergovernmental Coordination Element, the City shall obtain the wetland area along 1-95 (c3). Change: DELETION Comment: It appears that Policy B-1.4 was not based on accurate data. The area in question is east of 1-95 on the south boundary of the City. Field investigation subsequent to Plan adoption shows that the area was never a wetlands habitat, but was and is a drainage ditch and the associated overbank. This property is owned by Palm Beach County and is zoned Open Space (OS) by the City. City does not need' to obtain ownership to protect the area. 7. Location: Pg. III-A-18, Policy B-2.6 (NEW) Change: ADDITION Policy B-2.6 The City shallr to the maximum extent feasibler preserver conserver appropriately use and protect fisheriesr wildlife and marine habitats which serve as habitat for endanqered and threatened plant and animal species. Comment: Policy strengthens the City's commitment to preserve endangered and threatened species. See Support Document # i (Delray Oaks) for a complete discussion of this issue. 8. Location: Pg. III-A-18, Policy B-3.2 Policy B-3.2 Through intergovernmental efforts with the Lake Worth Drainage District and the South Florida Water Management District, a program for the protection of the shore line of Lake Ida shall be established. The City shall provide the lead through its Community Services Group. The program shall be developed by during FY 92/93. It shall address, among other items, the regulation of boat activity in order to reduce wave impact on the shore line. Change: REVISION Policy B-3.2 Page 4 supports Palm Beach County's pro~ram to restore and protect the shoreline of ~ake ~da. ~n additionf the City supports continuin~ monitorinq of boatinq activity in the lake to assure that this activity does not produce adverse impacts on the shoreline. Comment: Palm Beach County, through its Parks and Environmental Resource Management Departments, has implemented a program to restore the shoreline of Lake Ida within Lake Ida Park. This program includes exotic removal, recontouring of the shoreline and recreation of a marsh habitat. The new shoreline and habitat is protected from boat wakes by a breakwater. This project has satisfied the need for shoreline protection although a need remains to monitor boating activity and its impact on the shoreline of Lake Ida. Pag, 5 PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-B-22, Policy A-1.2 Policy A-1.2 Even though current standards for ocean discharge of effluent are being met, the. use of ocean discharge may not, in the long term, be an acceptable method of disposal of effluent. A program for the reuse of effluent from the Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant shall be presented to the Regional Board by June 1, 1993. (See Policy B-2.1 Conservation Element Policy A-4.7 and see Intergovernmental Coordination Element for related policies). Change: REVISION Policy A-1.2 Even though current standards for ocean discharge of effluent are being met, the use of ocean discharge may not, in the long term, be an acceptable method ~f for the normal disposal of all/ or even the majority, of effluent. A program to fully implement the reclamation and reuse of sewage effluent may be developed by the City, through the Wastewater Treatment Facility Board in the future. A (See Policy B-2.I Conservation Element Policy A-4.Tb and see Intergovernmental Coordination Element for related policies). Comment: See Support Document # 3 (Wastewater Effluent Reuse) for a complete discussion of this item. 2. Location: Pg. III-8-24, Objective B-2 Objective B-2 Even though the City has projected an adequate water supply, it shall provide for increasing draw through increased use of existing wells as opposed to developing new wells, and it shall enhance the area's water supply through the development of different methods of providing water. This objective shall be met in the performance of the following: (2b) Change: REVISION Page 6 Ob~ective B-2 Even though the City has projected an adequate water supply, it shall provide for increasing draw and the potential of reduced capacity through salt water intrusion and/or extended drought conditions through increased use of existing wells~ development of new wells and development of alternative technologies and methods of providing water, d~ ~d~d ~d objective shall be met in the performance of the following: (2b) Comment: The scope of this objective is expanded to address the realities of salt water intrusion and drought impact, and to allow the exploration and development of new technologies. 3. Location: Pg. III-B-25, Policy B-2.1 Policy B-2.1 The alternative of enhancing the water supply through the recycling of discharge from the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), after tertiary treatment, and then used either as a source of potable water, and/or irrigation water, and/or aquifer recharge shall be explored through technical studies. Change: REVISION Policy B-2.1 T~ ~d~XdZ~IZ d~ddZdd~ The City, through the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility BoardI shall develop a program to implement the "Northeast Quadrant Reclaimed Water System" project to reclaim a portion of the effluent from the Wastewater Treatment Plant for irrigation - purposes. The Clty~ through the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Board~ shall also explore the feasibility of the reuse of wastewater effluent for groundwater recharge in FY 93/94. Based upon the results of this feasibility study~ the Cityf throuqh the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Board, may develop Page a program to fully implement the reclamation and reuse of sewage wastewater effluent in the future. (Also see Conservation Policy A-4.Tb for related Dolic¥) Comment= See Support Document # 3 (Wastewater Effluent Reuse) for a complete discussion of this item. 4. Location= Pg. III-B-25, Policy B-2.5 (New) Change: ADDITION Policy B-2.5 The City shall develop a program to construct at least one Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) well to suDDlement water supply during conditions of drought or well field contamination and as a method of balancing the demand on water suDD1¥ wells during periods of high and low demand. This program shall include feasibility studies~ design~ and construction as warranted by the results of the feasibility studies. Comment: The relatively new technology of Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) has the potential to supplement water supply in Delray Beach by storage of treated water in the upper Floridan Aquifer during periods of low demand for later recovery and use during periods of high demand or during emergency conditions such as drought or well field contamination. 5. Location: Pg. III-B-25, Policy B-3.1 Policy B-3.1 The City shall maintain its program of responsible consumption of water (per capita basis) and shall decrease the overall per capita consumption of water by 10% from 1989 levels through continued implementation of the following techniques and programs= (Also see Objective A-4 of the Conservation Element). maintaining its water rate structure which sets a higher uniform rate for consumption and decreases customer capacity charges in order to promote reductions in water consumption as well as establishment of conservation surcharges, based on South Florida Water Management District formulae, and keyed to various levels of drought alert; · mandatory use of wells for irrigation purposes where conditions permit [LDR Section 7.7]; · enhanced enforcement of water use laws; · requirements for xeriscape landscaping. alternatives to be considered for all new development during the review of site and development plans [LDR Section 4.6.16(E)]; and · continuation of the regular preventive maintenance program for water mains, pumps and meters (see related Policy C-4.3) Change: ~EVISION Policy B-3.1 The City shall maintain its program of responsible consumption of water (per capita basis) and shall decrease the overall per capita consumption of water by 10% from 1989 levels through continued implementation of the following techniques and programs: (Also see Objective A-4 of the Conservation Element). · maintaining its water rate structure which establishes an inverted block rate structure to set higher consumption rates for increased water ea~ae~ e~a~g~d in order to promote reductions in water consumption as well as establishment of conservation surcharges, based on South Florida Water Management District formulae, and keyed to various levels of drought alert; · mandatory use of wells for irrigation purposes where conditions permit [LDR Section 7.7]; · continued ~~d enforcement of water use laws; · The consideration of ~~Zd xeriscape landscaping alternatives I~ ~Xd~ for all new development during the review of site and development plans [LDR Section .. 4.6.16(E)]; and Page continuation of the regular preventive maintenance program for water mains, pumps and meters (see related Policy C-4.3) Comment: Changes in the third and fourth bullets are housekeeping items to update the statements. See Support. Document # 2 (Water Rates) for a complete discussion of the changes in the first bullet. Pag, 10 OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-D-21, Policy B-2.5 (NEW) Change: ADDITION Policy B-2.5 The City shall ensure public access to publicly owned natural areas that provide passive resource based facilities (i.e. trails; wildlife observation areas; etc.) for the public use and enjoyment of the site. Comment: Policy strengthens the City's commitment to public access to natural areas. See Support Document # 1 (Delray Oaks) for a complete discussion of this issue. 2. Location: Pg. III-D-21, Policy B-2.6 (NEW) Change: ADDITION Policy B-2.6 The City shall ensure that passive resource based facilities (i.e. trails; wildlife observation areas; etc.) will be provided for the public use and enjoyment of publicly owned natural areas. Comment: Policy strengthens the City's commitment to public access to natural areas. See Support Document # 1 (Delray Oaks) for a complete discussion of this issue. HOUSING ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-E-6, Figure H-1 Change: ~EVISION Comment: This figure, "Major Residential Parcels", has been replaced with a new figure, "Potential Residential Units", to provide up to date (1994) information. Figure H-1 Major Resident£al and Vacant Parcels VACANT R ' ! ........ ~ CDUNTY .TLIRIS(]ICTION The Cit~/of Delray Beach MAJOR RESIDENTIAL PARCELS SPG STRATEGIC PI. ANNING GROUP INC Pag. ~3 FIGURE H- 1 ~ 2. Location: Pg. III-E-7, Table H-1 Table H-1 Ongoing Developments Single- Multi-Family Project Family Family Total 1. Sable Lakes 348 114 462 2. Sherwood Forest 125 --- 125 3. Isles of Delra¥ 100 48 148 4. Groves of Delray --- 156 156 5. Auburn Trace --- 256 256 6. Waterford Village --- 236 236 7. Housing Partnership 36 --- 33 Total Number of 609 810 1,416 Units Planned: Source: Strategic Planning Group, Inc., 1988 Change: DELETION Comment: The table of on-going developments is incorporated in the table of "Potential Residential Units", thus it is not applicable as a separate table. Page 3. Location: Pg. III-E-7, Table H-2 Table H-2 Available Land Potential Parcel Size Density Units Type A 143 ac+ 4 units/acre 532 Single-family detached (SFD) B 101 ac+ 4 units/acre 404 SFD/MF C 60 ac+ 12 units/acre 720 Multifamily (MF) D 30 ac+ 6 units/acre 180 MF E 11 ac+ 12 units/acre 132 MF F 8 ac+ 6 units/acre 48 MF G 20 ac+ 10 units/acre 200 MF H 25 ac+ 5 un/ts/acre 125 SFD/MF mixed Total Potential Housing Units: 2,241 Source: Strategic Planning Group, Inc., 1988 Change: REVISION SEE TABLE H-2 ON PAGE 17. Comment: The table of "Available Land" has been replaced with the table "Potential Residential Units" to reflect updated (1994) information. Page 16 -- TABLE H-2 AND TABLE L-4.-- POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS FEBRUARY 1994 CURRENT POTENTIAL ID, I DESIGNATION I ZONING I ACRES I UNITS 101 LOW DENSITY R1AA 10.00 50.0 103 LOW DENSITY PRD 5.00 25.0 110 LOW DENSITY CNTY 20.32 101.6 124 LOW DENSITY SAD 31.08 155.4 128 LOW DENSITY R~A 9.99 50.0 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 76.39 ..... 382..0 104 MEDIUM DENSITY CNTY 4.94 59.3 105 MEDIUM DENSITY CNTY 6.47 77.6 107 MEDIUM DENSITY CNTY 14.23 170.8 116 MEDIUM DENSITY RM 20.18 242.2 117 MEDIUM DENSITY RR 14.79 177.5 118 MEDIUM DENSITY CF 36.80 441.6 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION 97 41 ' 1'169;0 125 MIXED USE SAD 10.54 126.5 142 MIXED USE CNTY 94.82 680.0 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 105.36 ..... 806.5 102 RURAL RESIDENTIAL CNTY 107.01 535.1 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 107.01 ..... 535.1 106 TRANSITIONAL CNTY 8.38 100.6 111 TRANSITIONAL CNTY 8.32 99.8 113 TRANSITIONAL CNTY 17.56 210.7 114 TRANSITIONAL A 6.21 74.5 123 TRANSITIONAL POC 7.15 85.8 127 TRANSITIONAL RM 6.12 73.4 139 TRANSITIONAL POC 18.83 262.0 143 TRANSITIONAL A 33.97 407.6 146 TRANSITIONAL CNTY 52.18 626.2 147 TRANSITIONAL POC 10.00 120.0 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 168.72 ..... 2,060.6 122 PREVIOUS APPROVAL RM-8 18.56 140.0 150 PREVIOUS APPROVAL PRD 0.00 138.0 151 .PREVIOUS APPROVAL PRD 0.00 114.0 152 PREVIOUS APPROVAL SAD 0.00 292.0 153 PREVIOUS APPROVAL RM 0.00 158.0 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 18.56 ..... 842.0 GRAND TOTAL h · 573 45 5 795 2 SOURCE: CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, 1994. Page 17 4. Location: Pg. III-E-18, Policy A-1.4 Policy A-1.4: That these neighborhoods be identified as "stable residential" on the Housing Map, that the most restrictive residential zoning district which is applicable is affixed on the zoning map, and that requests for rezoning to a different zone designation, other than Community Facilities be denied. Change: REVISION Policy A-1.4: That these neighborhoods be identified as "stable residential" on the Housing Map, that the most restrictive residential zoning district which is applicable is affixed on the zoning map, and that requests for rezoning to a different zone designation, other than Community Facilities and Open Space be denied. Comment: The addition of Open Space as an allowable zoning category completes and furthers the policy direction of protecting stable residential neighborhoods. 5. Location: Pg. III-E-19, Policy A-2.4. Policy' A-2.4: That these neighborhoods be identified as "stable residential" on the Housing Map, that the most restrictive residential zoning district which is applicable is affixed on the zoning map, and that requests for rezoning to a different zone designation, other than Community Facilities be denied. Change: REVISION Policy A-2.4: That these neighborhoods be identified as "stable residential" on the Housing Map, that the most restrictive residential zoning district which is applicable is affixed on the zoning map, and that requests for rezoning to a different zone designation, other than Community Facilities and Open Space be denied. Comment: The addition of Open Space as an allowable zoning cktegory completes and furthers the policy direction of protecting stable residential neighborhoods. Page 18 COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-F-9, second bullet under Hurricane Evacuation · Within this area there is a population of approximately 5,422 (1980 Census Tracts 64, 7401, 7402). Change: ~EVISION · Within this area there is a population of approximately 7353 ~/622 (1990 ZP~ Census Tracts 64, 7401, 7402t 54.03). Comment: The data is updated to reflect the 1990 Census. 2. Location: Pg. III-F-19, Policy A-2.3 Policy A-2.3: The City shall request of the City of Boynton Beach, the Town of Gulfstream, the Town of Highland Beach, and Boca Raton that notice be given of any development which shall impact the Intracoastal Waterway by diversion of runoff, the increase in direct runoff, or the introduction of a water-dependent use or commercial or industrial use along the Intracoastal Waterway. If it is not apparent that there will be no adverse impacts upon the Intracoastal Waterway, the item shall be referred to the Palm Beach Countywide Planning Council for an analysis and recommendation pursuant to provisions of its Charter. (c13) Change: ~EVISION Policy A-2.3: The City shall request of the City of Boynton Beach, the Town of Gulfstream, the Town of Highland Beach, and Boca Raton that notice be given of any development which shall impact the Intracoastal Waterway by diversion of runoff, the increase in direct runoff, or the introduction of a water-dependent use or commercial or industrial use along the Intracoastal Waterway. If it is not apparent that there will be no adverse impacts upon the Intracoastal Waterway, the item shall be referred to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council for review and mediation as needed until such time as the Palm Beach County Interlocal Plan Amendment Review Committee exDands its review authority to this kind of Development Order Pag, 19 request. P~Z~ ~¢X ~dd~'t~'~d~ PZ~dZ~ ¢dd~Z ~~ ~ ~d ¢~d~ (c13) Comment: The Planning Council has been disbanded. The Review Committee has been formed to provide that role of intergovernmental coordination, review and mediation formerly provided by the Planning Council. 3. Location: Pg. III-F-20, Policy A-4.1 Policy A-4.1: The need for additional water dependent uses in the area shall be addressed to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Commission. If needs in addition to those identified in the City's Plan are identified, a siting program should be requested of the Commission. (c13) Change: REVISION Policy A-4.1: The need for additional water dependent uses in the area shall be addressed to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council ~d~~d~. If needs in addition to those identified in the City's Plan are identified, a siting program should be requested of the Council Cd~~d~. (c13) Comment: Typographical error. Note that the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, together with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, is in the process of developing a boat facility siting plan for Palm Beach County. This siting plan is a component of the Manatee Protection Plan, which is required before the State will issue permits for additional marina development. 4. Location: Pg. III-F-20, Policy A-4.3 Policy A-4.3: The City shall participate with its adjacent units of government along the Intracoastal Waterway in responding to efforts of the others to implement programs as contained with its Plan for the protection of living marine resources, the reduction of exposure to natural hazards, and the continuing provision of public access to the Ocean and Intracoastal Waterway. Such participation shall occur through the existing mechanisms of the South County Council of Governments, the Palm Beach County Beaches and Shores Council. Change: REVISION Page 20 Policy A-4.3: The City shall participate with its adjacent units of government along the Intracoastal Waterway in responding to efforts of the others to implement programs as contained with its Plan for the protection of living marine resources, the reduction of exposure to natural hazards, and the continuing provision of public access to the Ocean and Intracoastal Waterway. Such participation shall occur through the existing mechanisms of the South County Council of Governments. ~ ~d ~dZm ~dd~ ¢~Zt ~dd~ Comment: The Beaches and Shores Council's jurisdiction is limited to the area seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line. The Council has no role in the Intracoastal Waterway. 5. Location: Pg. III-F-21, Policy B-1.4 Policy B-1.4: Whenever development is proposed east of Highway A-1-A a survey of the property shall be required. Said survey shall identify any public access to lands seaward of the mean high tide or water line by prescription, prescriptive easement, or any other legal means or a surveyor's note that no such access exists. Any such access shall be eliminated or replaced only in compliance with F.S. 161.55(6). (c9) [LDR Section 4.5.5(c)] Change: REVISION Policy B-1.4: Whenever development is proposed east of Highway A-1-A a survey of the property shall be required. Said survey shall identify any public access to lands seaward of the mean high tide or water line by prescription, prescriptive easement, or any other legal means or a surveyor's note that no such access exists. No such access shall be eliminated or replaced except in compliance with F.$. 161.55(6).~ ~d~ Section 4.5.5(c)] Comment: Sentence structure is revised for clarity. 6. Location: Pg. III-F-28, Policy D-1.1 Policy D-1.1: Appendix I, Hurricane Evacuation; to A~nex V, Evacuation, (III-L) of Palm Beach County's Peacetime Emergency Plan and its Page 21 attendant recommendations for hazard mitigation and lnteragency hazard mitigation reports is hereby adopted by the City of Delray Beach and the Fire Marshall is directed to provide for the effective implementation and coordinat~on required by those recommendations. (c3) Change: REVISION Policy D-i.i: Appendix I, Hurricane Evacuation; to Annex V, Evacuation, (III-L) of Palm Beach County's Peacetime Emergency Plan and its attendant recommendations for hazard mitigation and interagency hazard mitigation reports is hereby adopted by the City of Delray Beach and the Coordinator of Emergency Services M~ZZ is directed to provide for the effective implementation and coordination required by those recommendations. (c3) Comment: The City has formalized the duties and responsibilities of individuals charged with emergency management through the adoption of Ordinance 7-92. See Support Document # 4 (Emergency Management) for a complete text of the ordinance. 7. Location: Pg. III-F-29, Policy D-1.2 Policy D-1.2: The Fire Chief shall annually review the City's Hurricane Operations Plan (Annex II of the City's Emergency Operations Plan) to insure that base data is current and to insure that it is consistent with the Palm Beach County Peacetime Emergency Plan. (c4) Change: REVISION Policy D-1.2: The Fire Chief shall annually review the City's Emergency Operations Guide EMM~4M~ O~M~Z~d ~ZM~ to insure that base data is current and to insure that it is consistent with the Palm Beach County Peacetime Emergency Plan. (c4) Comment: The City's procedures manual for all types of e~ergencies have been gathered into a single emergency management guide and renamed appropriately. 8. Location: Pg. III-F-30, Policy D-4.1 Policy D-4.1: That consistent with Goal Area "E" of ~he Public Facilities Element, and more Page 22 specifically with Objective E-l, the following drainage improvements shall have high priority= the one block area south of Atlantic Avenue adjacent to the Atlantic Avenue Bridge. · the Marina Historic District, and · Atlantic Avenue at Gleason, Venetian, and Seabreeze Avenues. Change= REVISION Policy D-4.1= That consistent with Goal Area "E" of the Public Facilities Element, and more specifically with Objective E-i, the following drainage improvements shall have high priority= · the one block area south of Atlantic Avenue adjacent to the Atlantic Avenue Bridge. · Atlantic Avenue at Gleason, Venetian, and Seabreeze Avenues. Comment= The drainage improvements project in the Marina Historic District has been completed. Page 23 FUTURE ~ USE ELE~EI~I~ 1. Location: Pg. III-G-2, Inventory Upon adoption of this Comprehensive Plan, the City's "reserve annexation area" will become replaced by the boundaries of it's official "Planninq Area". This area is shown on the maps contained in this Element and is generally described by the following boundaries: the Atlantic Ocean on the east; · the Town of Highland Beach and the City of Boca Raton on the south; · the Town of Gulfstream and the City of Boynton Beach on the north; · the E-3 Canal (one-quarter mile west of Military Trail) on the west with exceptions of territory which is developed and served by County Utility System #3. Change: REVISION Upon adoption of this Comprehensive Plan, the City's "reserve annexation area" will become replaced by the boundaries of it's official "Planning Area". This area is shown on the maps contained in this Element and is generally described by the following boundaries: · the Atlantic Ocean on the east; · the Town of Highland Beach and the City of Boca Ratont and unincorporated Palm Beach Countyt alonq the L-38 and C-15 canalst 'on the south; · the Town of Gulfstream and the City of Boynton Beach on the north; · the E-3 Canal (one-half ~d~ mile west of Military Trail) on the west with exceptions of territory which is developed and served by County Utility System 93. Comment: The description of the Planning Area is corrected f6r internal consistency (see also page II-2, "The Planning Area") Page 24 2. Location: Pg. III-G-5, Table L-1 Table L-1 Existing Land Use Inventory~ Category Acres % of Total Residential 4,010 40.3 Commercial 723 17.3 Industrial 251 2.5 Agricultural 391 3.8 Transportation 1,401 14.1 Recreation/Conservation 1,752 17.6 Educational/Public Buildings/ Grounds/Other Public Facilities 265 2.7 Vacant 1,163 11.7 Total 9,959 acres 100.0 15.56 square miles= x Includes City, unincorporated pockets and reserve planning area = This net area excludes acreage devoted to the Intracoastal Waterway, 1-95, Lake Ida, and makes allowances for excessive right-of-way of major arterial roadways Source: City of Delray Beach, 1986 Change: UVISION Page 25 Table L-1 Existing Land Use Inventory~ Category Acres % of Total Residential 4,206 42.2 Commercial 786 7.9 Industrial 257 2.6 Agricultural 391 3.9 Transportation 1,401 14.1 Recreation/Conservation 1,752 17.6 Educational/Public Buildings/ Grounds/Other Public Facilities 286 2.9 Vacant 878 8.8 Total 9,959 acres 100.0 15.56 square miles~ ~ Includes City, unincorporated pockets and reserve planning area ~ This net area excludes acreage devoted to the Intracoastal Waterway, 1-95, Lake Ida, and makes allowances for excessive right-of-way of major arterial roadways Source= City of Delra¥ Beach, 1994 Comment: The table has been updated to reflect the 1994 land use inventory. 3. Location: Pg. III-G-9, Figure L-4 Comment: This figure, "Major Residential Parcels", has been replaced with a new figure, "Potential Residential Units", to provide up to date (1994) information. Page 26 F-IGURE L-4 MAJOR RESIDENTIAL AND VKCANT PARCELS 0£1 RAY · BEAC~ ~ · VACANT RES The City of Delray Beach MAJOR RESIDENTIAL PARCELS SPGsTRATEGIC PLANNING GROUPINC FIGURE L-4 I~ 'Page 27 4. Location: Pg. III-G-10, Table L-3 Table L-3 Ongoing Developments Single- Multi-Family Project Family Family Total 1. Sable Lakes 348 114 462 2. Sherwood Forest 33 --- 33 3. Isles of Delray 100 48 148 4. Groves of Delray --- 156 156 Total Number of 481 318 799 Units Planned: Source: City of Delray Beach, 1992 Change: DELETION Comment: The table of on-going developments is incorporated in the table of "Potential Residential Units", thus it is not applicable as a separate table. 5. Location: Pg. III-G-10, Table L-4 Table L-4 Available Land Potential Parcel Size Density Units Type A 143 ac+ 4 units/acre 532 Single-family detached (SFD) B 101 ac+ 4 units/acre 404 SFD C 60 ac+ 12 units/acre 720 Multifamlly (MF) D 30 ac+ 6 units/acre 180 MF E 11 ac+ 12 units/acre 132 MF F 8 ac+ 6 units/acre 48 MF G 71 ac+ 10 units/acre 710 MF H 18 ac+ 5 units/acre 90 SFD/MF mixed Total Potential Housing Units: 2,816 Source: City of Delray Beach, 1992 Page 29 Change: REVISION SEE TABLE L-4 ON PAGE 31 Comment: The table of'"Available Land" has been replaced with the table "Potential Residential Units" to reflect updated (1994) information. Pag~ 30 -- TABLE H-2 AND TABLE L-4 -- POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS FEBRUARY 1994 CURRENT POTENTIAL liD, }DESIGNATION J ZONING I ACRES I UNITS 1 101 LOW DENSITY R1AA 10.00 50.0 103 LOW DENSITY PRD 5.00 25.0 110 LOW DENSITY CNTY 20.32 101.6 124 LOW DENSITY SAD 31 . 08 155 . 4 128 LOW DENSITY l~lA 9.99 50.0 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 76 . 39 ..... 382.0 104 MEDIUM DENSITY CNTY 4.94 59.3 105 MEDIUM DENSITY CNTY 6.47 77.6 107 MEDIUM DENSITY CNTY 14.23 170.8 116 MEDIUM DENSITY RM 20.18 242.2 117 MEDIUM DENSITY RR 14.79 177.5 118 MEDIUM DENSITY CF 36.80 441.6 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 97.41 ..... 1,169.0 ....... i25' ' NIXED USE SAD 10.54 126.5 142 NIXED USE CNTY 94.82 680.0 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 105.36 ..... 806.5 102 RURAL RESIDENTIAL CNTY 107.01 535.1 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 107.01 ..... 535. ! 105 TRANSITIONAL CNTY 8.38 100.6 111 TRANSITIONAL CNTY 8.32 99.8 113 TgANS ITIONM., CNTY 17.56 210.7 114 TRANSITIONAL A 6.21 74.5 123 TRANSITIONAL POC 7.15 85.8 127 TRANSITIONAL RM 6 · 12 73.4 139 TRANSITIONAL PO(: 18. $3 262.0 143 TRANSITIONAL A 33.97 407.6 146 TRAHSITIOHAL CNTY 52.18 626.2 147 TRANSITIONAL POC 10.00 120.0 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 168.72 ..... 2,060.6 122 PREVIOUS APPROVAL RM-8 18.56 140.0 150 PREVIOUS APPROVAL PRD 0.00 138.0 151 -PREVIOUS APPROVAL PRD 0.00 114.0 152 PREVIOUS APPROVAL SAD 0.00 292.0 153 PREVIOUS APPROVAL RM 0.00 158.0 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 18.56 ..... 842.0 GRAND TOTAL ............................ 573.45 ..... 5,795.2 SOURCE: CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, 1994. l:'ase 31 6. Location= Pg. III-G-33, Policy C-4.3 Policy C-4.3 A special CBD development plan shall be developed Jointly by the CRA and the City. It shall be initiated subsequent to completion of the Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Plan (see Policy C-2.4). It shall address the maximum development which can be accommodated in a competitive market while still retaining the "village like, community by-the-sea" character of the CBD. It shall further identify the infrastructure requirements, including parking, which will be needed to accommodate such an intensity of development. Such a plan shall be formally processed as an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. The plan shall be instituted under the lead of the City's Planning Department but conducted through close participation with the Community Redevelopment Agency. Change: REVISION Policy C-4.3 A special CBD development plan shall be developed jointly by the CRA and the City. It shall be initiated subsequent to completion of the Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Plan (see Policy C-2.4). It shall address the maximum development which can be accommodated in a competitive market while still retaining the "village like, community by-the-sea" character of the CBD. It shall further identify the infrastructure requirements, including parking, which will be needed to accommodate such an intensity of development. Such a plan shall be formally processed as an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. The plan shall be instituted under the lead of the Community Redevelopment A~enc¥ ~K~ ~Z~~ ~K~K but conducted through close participation with the City's Planning Department Comment: The Community Redevelopment Agency has taken the lead role in this planning effort. Policy C-2.2 of the CRA Plan identifies the specific item. 7. Location: Pg. III-G-33, Policy C-4.6 Policy C-4.6 The City and the C.R.A. shall, in FY 91/92, develop a strategy for attracting private and public educational institutions to the Pineapple Grove Area e.g. art and culinary schools or a branch of PBCC. Pag~ 3~ Change: DELETION Comment: Although the economic development of the Pineapple Grove Area is still an aim of the City and the CRA, this specific program is no longer active. Thus, the specific policy should be deleted. 8. Location: Pg. III-G-33, Policy C-4.9 Policy C-4.9 The following capital improvements have already been identified as essential components of efforts and programs which are necessary to keep the CBD a vital and competitive commercial marketplace. These are considered as short term (first planning period FY 90/91 to FY 95/96) capital improvements which should be a part of any general obligation bond program which is created. · Phase II of the Old School Square Project · Parking area west of Swinton or suitable substitutes for the O.S.S. Project · Veteran's Park improvement, without a riverwalk per Recreational Element · Phase III of Atlantic Avenue Beautification i.e. expansion of the beautification program east of the bridge to the Ocean · Alleyway enhancement program · Reconstruction of N.E. 7th Avenue Change: REVISION Policy C-4.9 The following capital improvements have already been identified as essential components of efforts and programs which are necessary to keep the CBD a vital and competitive commercial marketplace. These are considered as short term (first planning period FY 90/91 to FY 95/96) capital improvements which should be a part of any general obligation bond program which is created. Page 33 · Phase III of Atlantic Avenue Beautification i.e. expansion of the beautification program east of the bridge to the Ocean · Reconstruction of N.E. 7th Avenue Comment= Old School Square Phase II, Veterans Park Improvements, and the Alleyway Improvement Program have been comgleted. The parking area on N.W. 1st Avenue has been completed to provide parking for the Old School Square. project. Page 34 CAPITAL I~PROVE~ENT ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-H-18, Policy A-I.1 Policy A-i.1 The needs for a new park in the Southwest portion of the City and an accompanying Fire Station shall be provided concurrent with, or prior to, the development of Blood's Hammock Grove. Change: REVISION Policy A-I.1 The need~ for a new park in the Southwest portion of the City ~d ~ ~d~~ FX~ S~X~ shall be addressed ~6*Zd~d concurrent with, or prior to, the development of Blood's Hammock Grove. Comment: Fire Station #5, located on Linton Blvd. at Old Germantown Rd. was completed in 1993. Thus, that portion of Policy A-i.1 addressing the Fire Station is no longer applicable. 2. Location: Pg. III-H-24, Policy A-3.10 Policy A-3.10 In order to finance needed capital improvements as identified in this Element and which are most appropriately paid for from Enterprise Funds, the City shall utilize proceeds from the April 1, 1991, Water and Sewer Enterprise Revenue Bond. Change: DELETION Comment: Ail projects financed by the 1991 Water and Sewer Enterprise Revenue Bond have been completed. Thus, the policy is no longer applicable. Pago 3S INTERGOVER.NMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-I-19, Policy A-2.3 Policy A-2.3 Any conflicts emanating from Policy A-1.2 and which are not resolved prior to resubmission to D.C.A. shall be taken to the Palm Beach Countywide Planning County for mediation. (c2) Change: REVISION Policy A-2.3 Any conflicts emanating from Policy A-2.1 A~Z~Z and which are not resolved prior to resubmission to D.C.A. shall be taken to the Palm Beach Countywide Coordination Program and/or the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council as appropriate, ~Zm ~ ¢~]tW~ ~Z~Z~ ¢~ for direction and/or mediation. (c2) Comment: The referenced policy should be 2.1, not 1.2. If a conflict continues to exist, the first forum for seeking resolution would be through the Palm Beach Countywide Coordination Program to see if the conflict has a county- wide or multi-Jurisdictional implication. If so, direction from that organization should be followed. If the item is local in nature, it would be appropriate to seek the mediation services which are provided through the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. Pago 36 REQUIREMENTS FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IMPLEMENTATION 1. Location: Pg. IV-12, Five Year Capital Improvement Schedule Change: REVISION Comment: Table IV-3, the Five Year Capital Improvement Schedule for Projects > $100,000, has been revised to reflect the City's Five Year Capital Improvement Plan. Page 3'7 EXISTING 0 ~0~ ~ Page 38 EXISTING ~ " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o oo o od d ddo o OO 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ Page 39 EXISTING ~age 40 EXISTING ~ ~ oo~oooo~o4 4 o° o° o° Page 4I EXISTING ~ -- ~ O0 0 ~ ~ 0 0000 0 O0 0 0 0 0000 0 O0 0 0 0 0000 0 O0 0 0 0 0000 0 O0 0 0 0 00 O0 ~ O0 ~ ~ 0 ~0~ 0 O0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0 O0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 ~ O0 ~ 0 ~ 0~ 000 0 0 00000 0 0 0 0000000 0 00000 0 0 ~ 0000~00 00~ ~ 00000 ~ ~ ~ 0000~0 0~ ~ ~0 ~ eeeeo>c~e~o eeeeu ~age 42 REVISED TABLE IV-3 FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT · $100,000 I PROJECT & FUND I FY 1993.94 I FY 19~1-05 I FY 1~95-~ I FY 19g~-~7 I FY 19~?-~8 ! FY lg98-99 I WA~' NLMG4PrrAL OUTLAY MATER _UNN/UNE EXl'EN~ION~ 100,~01 0 0 0 I(X),(XX) ~E~fER MAIN/LINE EXTENSlON~ 119,0~ 0 0 0 OTHER IMP~3VEMEHI~ lg~.04~ 100,000 100;000 100i000 IMPROV~_ME_NT~ - C/TY ATTORNEY BLOCK 10~y000 ~0,000 0 0 0 0 OTHER MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 123,~20 1001000 100,000 I001000 1001000 200,000 FIRE STATION NQ3 WATER & ~=WER ~0,000 0 0 0 0 0 DOVER RD. (LOWSON TO UNTON) 20' WATER MAIN 0 2~2,500 0 0 0 0 SLUDGE HANDLING SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT~ 0 125,000 0 0 0 0 BOYNTON BEACH INTERCONNECT & PUIdI~TATION 0 100:000 0 0 4001000 0 VAC-CO~ TRUCK (NEW) 0 0 150,0~0 0 0 0 BRANDON DRIVE (WATER & SEWER) 0 0 210,000 0 0 0 SILVER TERRACE (WATER & SEWER) 0 0 200,0{~0 0 0 0 DOVER RD. TO S.W. TANK-20' WATER MAIN 0 0 0 41S,000 0 0 FED.HWY. (AVE. D TO C-1S CANAL) WATE,&SEV~R 0 0 0 ~S0,O00 0 0 ,..,~U.~ I ~.~,,m I .,..,~O0 I ~O,0O0 I I&O~TER ~'WAQE UFT STATION 2~3,S11 0; 0 0 0 ~ ALLEYWAY~ - PHA~E II 222,000 0 0 0 0 0 ~OI.ATION VALVF. E/DISTRIBUI'ION M,000 ~,000 M,0~0 ~,000 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ~,4~1 M,QQ0 SS,0QO ~,000 M,O~O ~,0~0 ;FIRE HYDRANT REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 81,1~1 ~,000 ~,000 ~,000 ~minnn ~,000 WATER iNATER I~.~'R REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ~,000 56,0Q0 ~,000 LJFT 8TAllON CONVERSION TO SUBMERSIBI.E 285,975 140,(XX) 140,0~0 I..AKE IDA LINE RELOCATION (COW3RE88 TO 8WINTON) 0 225,000 0 0 0 0 5.W. 10TH ~t-~,'.': Z20,(X)0 0 0 0 0 0 INA~r. Ji I&NN8 94,0~8 0 0 0 0 0 iN. AI'I.J~T~ AVE. WATER MNN RELOCATION 150,000 0 0 0 ' 0 0 4UDU~TM, UNDEU., CURLEW WATEWSEWER 0 120,000 0 0 0 0 EA8T N~EA RD. RF. OOf~TRUCTION WATER/SEWER UPORADES 0 220,~00 0 1 0 0 BUlK)CID 8i'~i~ TOWER MEDIA RF. PI. ACEYENT 0 0 2~0,hm 0 0 0 N,,BA~-m=~ RD. (I~OE~ TO CURLEW) WA~ f.~ 0 0 ~,nm 0 0 0 WATER/SEWeR 0 0 0 130,~ 0 0 S.W. 10TH AVENUE 4~.279 0 0 0 0 0 N.E. 4~ 8~EET ~.¥~.¥O~i TO N.E. 2~ 8?.) 77,~02 0 0 0 0 0 SC~,~L SITE'S' RGN) &~-,~O~EYEh~ 5GrCXX) 1S0,C~Q 0 0 0 0 SWINTON/SOUTH ~T~./~.W. 10TH STREET 11$.89~ 0 0 0 0 0 EAST LAKE IDA BEAU¥i~,ATION 36.000 124~000 0 0 0 iA/EST LAKE IDA BEA~¥iFiCATIC)N 41 ~000 0 0 0 0 0 TENNIS CENTER {M~'~OVEMENT~ 1,7036~4 0 0 0 0 0 LEON WEEKES S~CRUS TRAIL PARK (PROFESSIONAL SERVICES) 25.000 0 0 0 0 0 &UTOMATED IRREGATION SYSTEMS 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 BEAUTIFICATION-CITY AI'rORNEY PROPERTY 0 0 51,000 0 0 0 POMPEY PARK F'OOi. 406300 170.000 0 0 0 0 BUILDING RENEWAL & REPlaCEMENT 56.373 . 100000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100000 EQUi~,,IF. NT RENEWAL & REPLACEMENT 183 009 I 100.000 100.0~0 100.000 100.000 100000 CITY HALUPLOICE HURRICANE SHU'i'~'ERS 0 = 0 0 27~000 0 0 SILVER TERRACE PAVING/DRAINAGE 0 J 0 300.000 0 0 0 OITY SEAWALL CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 0I 204,000 204,(X)0 0 0 0 TOTAL~ " I S~lm~,S' I $~,om,om I ss,~o,ooo I m~,ooo REVISED TABLE IV-3 FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT > $100,000 ! PROJECT & FUND I ;Y ~3-~ I FY ~-0S I FY ~9~S-;~ I FY ~9~-07 I FY 1~?-~ I FY ~'~ ! MUN/C~PAL O43L~ COURSE -_"~_ ._; COURSE CLUB HOUSE 21335,0~ 0 0 0 ' 0 0 'IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 '8R!_nG_-~_ REPLACEMENT 0 0 0 0 0 .. PROJECTS LESS THAN ~100,000 170,000 155,000 ~5,000 115,000 115,000 FIRE ADMINISTRATION 778,15~ 0 0 0 0 0 'NEIGHRORHOOO IMPROVEMENI'8 321,7~ 0 0 0 0 ~.W. DRAIILN3E (PHASE II) 115,~0, 0 0 0 0 0 STREET RECONSTRUCTION ~IASE It) 2,0~,~8~ 0 0 0 0 C.S.D. ALLEYWAY RECONSTRUCT ON 334,950 0 0 0 0 0 SPADY ELEMENTARY ER.CXX) 0 0 0 0 $.W. 10TH STREET 1,755~811 0 0 0 0 0 BEAUTIFICATION - W. ATLANTIC -) 1-95 TO MILITARY 215,020 0 0 0 0 0 BEAUTIFICATION - SWINTON AVENUE 432,9~0 0 0 0 0 0 BEAUTIFICATION - ATLANTIC E. TO OCEAN ~02,000 i ~0,000 0 0 0 0 BEAUTIFICATION - BARWICK ROAD 51,:le0 i 0 0 0 0 0 I F.A. TURTLE ~ERVA~ ~RaM I 0)44 I 12,0IX) I 12,0CX) I ~14,0O0 1 14,0m I 14,Qcx) I ERVEY~, DUNE MANAGEMENT, OTHER I 80,845 I l~,Om I ~,~0 I m,~ I ~0= I ~"~ I I I s~o,ooo I ~o I ~o I ~o I ~o I ~#ICLE REF'LACEMENT PROGPa,~A ~,~o I mo,mo i mo,eeo I Mo,om I mo,~ I eeo,~ I I TOT,~.s ~,~ I __,~__,mo I ~o,ooo I mo,~o I ~,~ I ~.~ 1 S.W. STYE T~K ~O ~,~ 0 0~ 0 0 0 ~ ~E WE~ ~. ~ ~,~ 0 0; 0: 0 0 N.E. 8~E T~, ,~ H.'.) 1,.,~ 0 ; ; 0 0 WA~R ~N - ~ I~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 WA~R ~ - ~ A~NUE 415,~ i 0 O 0, 0 0 WATER ~N - N. ~K ~ M:I~ 0 O 0 0 0 WA~R ~N - Rl~~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0~ 0 0 ~1~ ~ ~. ~ 2,31e~0 0' O~ 0 0 WA~~~~~ W*TE; ~ ~,~ 0 0 0 0 T~SMI~N ~1~1~ TO N.E. T~K 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 ~RIWl ~UCT~ WELLS, PIPING 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 ~L SITE'S' LI~ STA~FORCE ~N 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 ~R RO~ - ~ WATER ~IN (~) 0 ~,~ 0 0 0 0 ~UTHWEST ST~GE TANK (RESERVE) 0 ~,~ ~,~ ~,~ ~,~ ~ ~1 TOTALS I ~t~ [ S1.2~r~ [ ~5,~ J ~,~ I ~l~ I ~.~I STOR~ATER UTILI~ FEE PR~ECTS LESS THAN ~1~.~ ~.~ ~ ~2.~ ~ TO BE DETERM:NED ' ~ND CONSIDE~TION: WITH REVIEW OF THE ~TER D~INAGE P~ IN 1~, ~NSlDE~TION ~ REVENUE ~ND ~ OPTED TO ~NU~ ~TION TOT~ . ~.,~[ ~t~ J Fase 44 PROCEDURES FOR MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF THE PLAN 1. Location: Pg. V-l, Implementation of goals, objectives, and policies of the elements of the plan Immediate Needs: The following items have been identified as items which must be addressed as soon as possible. 1. Preparatory work for establishment of a Storm Water Facility Fee program CIE A-2.2 & PF C-1 2. General Obligation Bond Issue program CIE A-3.9 3. Process revisions re CIE, CIP, CIB -- CIE A-4 Fiscal Year 91/92 1. Creation of "scenic street" program T B-3.2 2. Lindell & Federal Highway Redevelopment Plan LU ' C-2.6 & H B-3.1 3. Enhanced street marking program T C-2.1 4. Review of street names & system T B-2.2 5. Congested intersection inventory & program T B-2.1 6. City/CRA strategy re public/private education facilities in Pineapple Grove LU C-4.6 7. City/CRA use of alleys program LU C-4.7 8. West Atlantic Redevelopment Plan LU C-2.4 & H B-3.1 9. Germantown Road Redevelopment Plan LU C-2.5 & H B-3.1 10. In-town shuttle, program development T A-1.3 & Beach shuttle transportation program eSR B-3.1 and CM B-i.1 11. Land Use Regulation for Wellfields C A-2.3 and PF B-4.2 12. Discharge in waterways ordinance C C-2.2 & C C-2.1 re program for termination of a/c discharge 13. Rezoning industrial land in Wellfield Protection Zone %3 of Series 20 Wellfield LU B-1.2 14. City/CRA Atlantic Avenue governmental complex strategy LU C-3.5 15. Post disaster redevelopment program preparation CM D-3 16. Resolve FIND property status/disposition CM C-4.1 & 4.2 17. Community Residential Home amendment to the LDR's H A-5.11 18. Wellfield protection expansion to 1' drawdown area C-2.2 19. Rezoning of wellfield protection zones 91 & 92 PF B-4.3 20. City/.~RA marketing strategy LU C-3.5 21. Neighborhood Information Exchange Program H A-1 Page 45 22. Pineapple Grove neighborhood plan LU C-4.8 Fiscal Year 92/93 1. East of Woods of Southridge Redevelopment Plan H B-3.1 2. Mooring facilities study CM C-6.5 3. Study re ways to accommodate staffing increases. PFD-3.1 4. Creation of "scenic street" program T B-3.2 5. Silver Terrace Redevelopment Plan LU C-2.7 6. Report re mitigation of impacts of point source pollution PF A-1 7. Report re mitigation impacts of non-point source pollution PF A-2 8. Alternatives re canal recharge/storage PF B-2.1 9. Public information exhibits PF F-1 10. Pole & obstruction removal program T C-2.2 11. C.B.D. Development Plan LU C-4.3 12. Program for reuse of effluent discharqe and addressinq termination of ocean discharqe PF A-1.2 13. Sewer Master Plan, revisions & update PF C-1 14. Enhanced Code Enforcement Program powers H A-5.3 15. "Rehabilitation Strategy" Program development H B-2.3 16. Lake Ida Shoreline Protection Program C B-3.2 17. Intracoastal Shoreline Protection Program C B-3.3 18. Seawall ordinance review and modification CM D-4.2 19. Funding program developed for the cemetery expansion. PF D-2.1. 20. Housing revolving loan fund program development H A-5.1 21. Rezoning of wellfield 20 area LU B-1.2 22. Intergovernmental agreement with the County re land use in annexation area LU B-3.3 23. Commence annexation program LU B-3.4 24. Report re collection and disposal of "wastes" PF A-3 25. Alternative re WWTP discharge for irrigation PF B-2.1 26. Water conservation (forced) program PF B-3.1 & program expansion C A-4.2 27. Snorkel Park Study CM C-6.4 28. Obtain rights to land for "reserve" wellfield LU B-1.3, PF B-2.4 29. Cross dune beach access study CM A-1.5 Fiscal Year 93/94 1. Evaluation and Appraisal Report 2. Assessment of user fees OSR A-3.2 Pago 46 3. Llnton/S.W. 4th Avenue Redevelopment Plan LU C-2.8a and H B-3.1 4. Redevelopment Plan, area south of the CBD H B-3.1 &LUC2.9 7. Assessment of environmental impact of concrete plants C A-3.4 Change: REVISION Fiscal Year 91/92 1. Creation of "scenic street" program T B-3.2 2. Lindell & Federal Highway Redevelopment Plan LU C-2.6 & H B-3.1 3. Enhanced street marking program T C-2.1 4. Review of street names & system T B-2.2 5. Congested intersection inventory & program T B-2.1 6. West Atlantic Redevelopment Plan LU C-2.4 & H B-3.1 7. Germantown Road Redevelopment Plan LU C-2.5 & H B-3.1 8. In-town shuttle, program development T A-1.3 & Beach shuttle transportation program OSR B-3.1 and CM B-1.1 9. Resolve FIND property status/disposition CM & 4.2 10. Community Residential Home amendment to the LDR's LU A-5.11 11. Neighborhood Information Exchange Program H A-1 ~ ~3 ~Z S~tl~d 2f W~ZZZZ~Zd ~ Page 47 Fiscal Year 92/93 1. East of Woods of Southridge Redevelopment Plan H B-3.1 2. Study re ways to accommodate staffing increases. PF D-3.1 3. Silver Terrace Redevelopment Plan LU C-2.7 4. Report re mitigation of impacts of point source pollution PF A-1 5. Report re mitigation impacts of non-point source pollution PF A-2 6. Public information exhibits PF F-1 7. Pole & obstruction removal program T C-2.2 8. C.B.D. Development Plan LU C-4.3 9. Sewer Master Plan, revisions & u~date PF C-1 10. Enhanced Code Enforcement Program powers H A-5.3 11. "Rehabilitation Strategy" Program development H B-2.3 12. Seawall ordinance review and modification CM D-4.2 13. Housing revolving loan fund program development H A-5.1 14. Report re collection and disposal of "wastes" PF A-3 15. Snorkel Park Study CM C-6.4 16. Discharge tn waterways ordinance C C-2.2 & C C-2.1 re Program for termination of a/c discharge 17. Post disaster redevelopment program preparation CM D-3 18. Pineapple Grove neighborhood plan LU C-4.8 19. Complete Tennis Center LU C-3.6 20. Drainage Master Plan PF E-i.1 21. Amend CBD zone distr~ct to accommodate 30 DU/Ac LU A-5.13 22. Amend CBD zone district to accommodate industrial and commerce uses LU A-5.14 Page 48 Fiscal Year 93/94 1. Assessment of user fees OSR A-3.2 2. Llnton/S.W. 4th Avenue Redevelopment Plan LU C-2.8a and H B-3.1 3. Redevelopment Plan, area south of the CBD H B-3.! &LUC2.9 4. Assessment of environmental impact of concrete plants C A-3.4 5. Intracoastal Shoreline Protection Program C B-3.3 6. Commence annexation program LU B-3.4 7. Feasibility study for wastewater effluent reuse by groundwater recharge PF B-2.1 & C A-4.Tb Fiscal Year 94/95 1. Leon Weekes Interpretive Trail C B-1.3 Fiscal Year 95/96 1. Evaluation and Appraisal Report Comment: The projects list is revised to account for projects and programs that have been completed, eliminated or rescheduled in previous amendments of in the current amendment. T ~ '%Aclvanced\9 4-1 Page 49 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FLORIDA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING A PUBLIC HEARING will be held on the following proposed ordinances at 7:00 P.M. on TUESDAY. NOVEMBER 15. 1994 (or at any continuation of such meeting which is set by the Commission), in the City Commission Chambers, 100 N.W. 1st Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida, at which time the City Commission will consider their adoption. The proposed ordinances may be inspected at the Office of the City Clerk at City Hall, 100 N.W. 1st Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays. Ail interested parties are invited to attend and be heard with respect to the proposed ordinances. ORDINANCE NO. 84-94 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 71, "PARKING REGULATIONS", BY REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 70-94 AND FORMER SECTION 71.60 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES AND ENACTING A NEW SECTION 71.060, "PARKING METER PERMITS", OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, TO ESTABLISH THAT ALL PERSONS MAY OBTAIN A PARKING PERMIT FOR ANCHOR, SANDOWAY, AND THE HOLIDAY INN NORTH PARKING LOTS, AND TO LIMIT THE PURCHASE OF PARKING PERMITS FOR THE INGRAHAM AVENUE LOT TO CITY RESIDENTS IN THE MANNER WHICH EXISTED PRIOR TO ENACTMENT OF ORDINANCE NO. 70-94; ESTABLISHING A FEE FOR THE PARKING PERMIT; TO PROVIDE FOR THE TRANSFERRING OF PARKING PERMITS AND THE ISSUANCE OF SUBSTITUTE STICKERS FOR A SUBSTITUTE VEHICLE ACQUIRED BY THE SAME PERMIT HOLDER SUBSEQUENT TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE ORIGINAL PARKING PERMIT; PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, A SAVING CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO. 87-94 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, REZONING AND PLACING LAND PRESENTLY ZONED POC (PLANNED OFFICE CENTER) DISTRICT, IN PART, AND A (AGRICULTURAL) DISTRICT, IN PART, TO RM (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT, WHICH PROVIDES A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT WITH FLEXIBLE DENSITIES HAVING A BASE OF SIX (6) UNITS PER ACRE AND A RANGE TO TWELVE (12) UNITS PER ACRE, AND WHICH ALSO AUTHORIZES THE CITY COMMISSION TO ESTABLISH THE DENSITY FOR A SPECIFIC RM DEVELOPMENT BY AFFIXING A NUMERICAL SUFFIX TO THE DESIGNATION TO LIMIT THE DENSITY TO A SPECIFIC NUMBER BETWEEN SIX AND TWELVE UNITS PER ACRE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 4.4.6(H)(1) OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SAID LAND BEING LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MILITARY TRAIL, APPROXIMATELY 1,400 FEET SOUTH OF LINTON BOULEVARD, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; AND AMENDING "ZONING MAP OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, 1994"; PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, A SAVING CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO. 85-94 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, REZONING AND PLACING LAND PRESENTLY ZONED GC (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT IN THE CF (COMMUNITY FACILITIES) DISTRICT; SAID LAND BEING GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDES OF N.W. 5TH AVENUE, BETWEEN N.W. 1ST STREET AND N.W. 2ND STREET; AND AMENDING "ZONING MAP OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, 1994"; PROVIDING' A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, A SAVING CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO. 86-94 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, REZONING AND PLACING LAND PRESENTLY ZONED CF (COMMUNITY FACILITIES) DISTRICT IN THE GC (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT; SAID LAND BEING LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WEST ATLANTIC AVENUE, BETWEEN S.W. 1ST AVENUE AND S.W. 2ND AVENUE; AND AMENDING "ZONING MAP OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, 1994"; PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, A SAVING CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO. 89-94 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, ANNEXING TO THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, LOT 19 OF DELRAY BEACH ESTATES LOCATED AT 2706 NORTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY, WHICH LAND IS CONTIGUOUS TO EXISTING MUNICIPAL LIMITS OF SAID CITY; REDEFINING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE SAID LAND; PROVIDING FOR THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF SAID LAND; AFFIXING AN OFFICIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR SAID LAND TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AS CONTAINED IN THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; ELECTING TO PROCEED UNDER THE SINGLE HEARING ADOPTION PROCESS FOR SMALL SCALE .LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE ZONING THEREOF TO GC (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT; PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, A SAVING CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDINANCE NO. 90-94 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, ADOPTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE "LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION ACT", FLORIDA STATUTES SECTIONS 163.3161 THROUGH 163.3243, INCLUSIVE; ALL AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" ENTITLED "COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1" AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE, A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. - 2 - ORDINANCE NO. 91-94 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING TITLE XI, "BUSINESS REGULATIONS", OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, BY REPEALING CHAPTER 112, "ALARM SYSTEMS", IN ITS ENTIRETY, AND ENACTING A NEW CHAPTER 112, "ALARM SYSTEMS" TO PROVIDE FOR THE REGULATION OF ALARM SYSTEMS WITHIN THE CITY 'OF DELRAY BEACH; PROVIDING A GENE '~AL REPEALER CLAUSE,. A SAVING CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Please be advised that if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the City Commission with respect to any matter considered at this hearing, such person will need a record of these proceedings, and for this purpose such person may need to ensure that a verbatim record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. The City does not provide nor prepare such record. Pursuant to F.S. 286.0105. PUBLISH: Delray Beach News CITY OF DELRAY BEACH November 4, 1994 Alison MacGregor Harry City Clerk - 3 - NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ~94-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. FLORIDA The City Commission of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, will consider Amendment #94-1 to the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. Amendment #94-1 consists of amendments to the goals, objectives and policies of individual elements based upon assessment of tasks accomplished, availability of resources, and new information. The TEXT AMENDMENTS address the following subject matter: (1) Amendments related to the preservation of the Delray Oaks ecosite, describing Palm Beach County's program to acquire the site and updating policies related to this subject, adding new policies to strengthen the Comprehensive Plan direction toward preservation of environmentally sensitive lands. (2) Amendments related to wastewater effluent reuse, describing the current program and updating policies related to this subject area. (3) Amendments related to the new water rate structure, describing the inverted block rate structure and updating policies related to this subject. (4) Other changes of a technical and clerical nature. (5) Updates to the status of a number of action policies. (6) Revisions to the Five Year Schedule of Improvements. The City Commission will conduct a Public Hearing on Comprehensive Plan Amendment #94-1 on TUESDAY. NOVEMBER %5. 1994. AT 7;00 ?.M, (or at any continuation of such meeting which is set by the Commission), in the Commission Chambers at City Hall, 100 N.W. 1st Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida. At this meeting the City Commission will accept public testimony and will consider the adoption of Comprehensive Plan Amendment #94-1. All interested citizens are invited to attend the public hearing and comment upon proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment #94-1 or submit their comments in writing on or before the date of this hearing to the Planning and Zoning Department. Copies of the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are available at the Delray Beach Planning and Zoning Department, City Hall, 100 N.W. 1st Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida 33444 (Phone 407/243-7040), between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE CITY COMMISSION WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS HEARING, SUCH PERSON WILL NEED A RECORD OF THESE PROCEEDINGS, AND FOR THIS PURPOSE SUCH PERSON MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. THE CITY DOES NOT PROVIDE NOR PREPARE SUCH RECORD. PURSUANT TO F.S. 286.0105. PUBLISH: Delray Beach News CITY OF DELRAY BEACH November 9, 1994 Alison MacGregor Harty City Clerk ********************************************************************** Instructions to Newspaper: This notice must be at least a one-quarter (1/4) page ad, with the headline (NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING / COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT #94-1 / CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA) to be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The ad is not to be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Thank you for your assistance. - 2 - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT MEETING OF: OCTOBER 17, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: VI.A. RESPONSE TO ORC, AMENDMENT 94-1 ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD: The item before the Board is that of review of the proposed response to the Objections, Recommendations, and Comments (ORC) report. Associated with this review are proposed modifications to Plan Amendment 94-1. The action to be taken is in the form of a recommendation to the City Commission. BACKGROUND: Proposed Plan Amendment 94-1 was heard by the Planning and Zoning Board on April 18, 1994. It was transmitted to Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) by action of the City Commission on May 17, 1994. The DCA ORC Report was received on September 12, 1994. The Plan Amendment proposed changes to eight Comprehensive Plan elements, 29 policies, one objective, the Five Year Schedule of Improvements, and related background data. Refer to the Table of Contents within the Amendment (attached) for an outline of the items which were considered. The Board is to review the Response to ORC Report and the related modifications to Plan Amendment 94-1. The City Commission will then consider the Board's recommendation when it acts on the adoption ordinance. The ordinance will be before the City Commission for first reading on November lst; and, second reading (adoption) on November 15th. In addition to the above, it is appropriate to modify the Five Year Schedule of Capital Improvements to reflect the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). ANALYSIS: The ORC Report contains 13 objections. The objections deal with the clarity of the intended changes, lack of sufficient supporting data, and with consistency with Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) and State goals and policies. The attached Response to ORC is an analysis and recommended disposition for each of the objections. P & Z Board Memorandum Staff Report Response to ORC 94-1 Page 2 RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, accept the Response to ORC Report and recommend to the City Commission that Plan Amendment 94-1 be modified as described below and then adopted. 1. Modify the objectives and policies as detailed in the attached Response to ORC Report. 2. Modify the Five Year Schedule of Improvements to reflect the adopted CIP. Attachments: * Plan Amendment 94-1 Transmittal * Response to ORC Report Objections * ORC Report * Revised Five Year Schedule of Improvements Report prepared by John Walker Reviewed by Diane Dominguez ~[~~ T: \advanced\ORC3 PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT MEETING OF: August 16, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: VI. A. - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD: The item before the Board is that of receiving a report on the status development of the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), including the Capital Improvement Budget (CIB) for FY 94/95. BACKGROUND: The CIP is developed throughout the summer of each year and adopted along with the operating budget in September. Budget items included are capital expense items with a minimum cost of $25,000. The CIP is reflected in the Comprehensive Plan as the Five Year Capital Improvements Schedule, although that schedule addresses items over $100,000. The Board's responsibility'is to review the CIP for consistency with the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The Board then makes a recommendation to the City Commission whether or not to adopt the CIP. The first draft of the CIP was reviewed by the Board and transmitted as part of Plan Amendment 94-1 in the form of modifications to the Five Year Capital Improvements Schedule. During the adoption action for the Plan Amendment in October, The Five Year Schedule will be adjusted to reflect the final form of the CIP. During the review of Plan Amendment 94-1, the items in the CIP was found by the Board to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The current version of the CIP (revision #4) is attached for information. Changes from the Board's previous review are minimal, and all items are still consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. RECOMMENDED ACTION: No action is required by the Board, except to receive and file Revision #4 of the CIP. Attachment: CIP (revision #4) Report prepared by John Walke~l Reviewed By Diane Dominguez T: \advanced\CIP1. DOC. VI.A. CITY OF DELRAY BEACH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 REVISION NO. 4 REVISION DATE- JULY 31, 1994 , CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM The Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) provides a blueprint for the City to complete its final stages of growth. The program places projects valued at $25,000 or more in pdodty order, and schedules the projects for funding and implementation. As presented, it is a five-year forecast · ,,~,'r. ch allo-,,,,-s the City to plan ahead for its capital needs. The preparation of a Capital Improvement Program serves many purposes: · Promotes advanced planning and programming by department heads and serves as a fiscal planning tool to forecast the capital demands on revenues and future borrowing needs. · Provides for orderly replacement of facilities and equipment. · Provides an overall view of the growth and development within the City and helps to coordinate capital improvements within the rate of anticipated growth to satisfy concurrency requirements. · Ensures that capital projects will be implemented in accordance with objectives as set forth by the City's Comprehensive Plan, Capital Improvement Budget In January of each year the Capital Improvement Program begins with departments submitting capital budget requests to the budget team. Requests are based on their multi-year capital needs and improvement trends. All appropriate departments report on the status of the approved capital projects, the projects which are programmed for the next fiscal year and any changes desired in the five-year plan, such as new requests. Upon review and approval by the City Manager, the Proposed Capital Improvement Program is reviewed by the Local Planning Agency for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and for the purpose of adding a new fiscal year to the schedule of improvements. All projects which are included in the Capital Budget must be found not to be inconsistent with the Plan. The City Manager, with the Local Planning Agency's recommendations, submits the Capital Improvement Program to the Commission along with the annual operating budget for their approval and appropriation of the first year projects which constitutes the Capital Budget. PROGRAM PARAMETER To develop a Capital Improvement Program it is necessary to identify what is meant by Capital Improvement. Capital Improvements can be defined as: · Physical assets, constructed or purchased, that have a minimum cost of $25,000. · Property, assets or improvements with an estimated life of five years or more, including land and interest therein. · Large-scale physical developments and acquisitions, typically a one-time investment that generally result in a capital acquisition. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Planning Area The Planning area is considered the area in which the complete municipal needs are serviced by the City and can be geographically described as follows: · Bounded on the east by the Atlantic Ocean. · Bounded on the north by the Town of Gulfstream, the City of Boynton Beach and by Palm Beach Courtly along the L-30 Canal. · Bounded by the south by the Town of Highland Beach, the City of Boca Raton and by Palm Beach County along the L-38 Canal. · Bounded on the west by the E-3 Canal less certain specific housing developments. The complete Planning Area is shown in Figure S-1. Population Projections for Basic Services 1993 87% Built Out Permanent Residents 48,644 Seasonal Residents 8,400 2000 100% Built Out Total Residents 75,000 Level of Service Standards Levels of service are established in the Comprehensive Plan to ensure that public facilities will be sufficient to provide services given the future growth of the City. These standards and the ability to meet them are as follows: Sanitary Sewer Standard: 115 gallons per day per person Status: Plant capacity 12 m.g.d., present usage 7.63 m.g.d., Plant capacity is sufficient to buildout. Septic tanks in enclave areas to be replaced within the current planning period. Water Standard: 195 gallons per day per person, 263 gallons per day per person peak demand Status: Plant capacity 27.2 m.g.d., Welll'ield capacity 30,0 m.g.d., Storage capacity 6.88 m.g., present usage 13.2 m.g.d., Emergency interconnects with the City of Boca Raton, Boynton Beach and Palm Beach County, both plant capacity and available supply sufficient to buildout. Solid Waste Standard: 7.2 pounds of sol,d wasle per person per day Status: Plant under jurisdiction of the Sohd Waste Authority, present incineration and landfill with additional recycling, mulching and ch~ppmg services sufficient to buildout. Stormwater Drainage Standard: Area d~a,nage responsibility of the South Florida Water Management District and the Lake Worth Drmnage District. Status: New development must comply wdh codes to be permitted, existing developed areas to be improved in priority order according to Ihe Stormwater Master Plan. Traffic Standard: City maintains 163 redes o! roadways. Streets within the city limits must be maintained at a level "C", state and county streets and city main arterials at a level "D". Status: System will meet standards with ex~stino improvements. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Park Facility Standard: 3 acres per 1,000 people for open space, National standard for facilities. Status: Facilities exceed current standards, open space at 8 acres per 1,000 people, additional ballfields, basketball courts and boat ramps required to meet deficiencies. Major Program Objectives and Activities The City's Comprehensive Plan lays the groundwork in identifying improvement areas to be programmed. It identifies separate goals, objectives and activities for conservation, public facilities, traffic, open space, housing, coastal management and future land use. Each of these topics is considered an element of the Comprehensive Plan in planning for future growth requirements. The following briefly outlines some of the goals and major programs and activities of each element: Conservation Element - Includes the protection of the water quality and quantity, conservation of sensitive land and air and waterway quality. - Reduce the per capita water consumption through conservation programs. - Automate major irrigation systems. - Reuse wastewater effluent to reduce dependence on surficial aquifer and minimize ocean outfall discharge. Public Facilities Element - To provide a safe and decent physical environment; potable water shall be planned for and provided and sewer collection systems and water distribution shall be provided to unserved areas and existing systems upgraded for the protection of the environment. - Implementation of water/sewer/drainage master plans. - Establish renewal and replacement funding for water and sewer infrastructure. - Establish municipal building maintenance funding. - Collection of hazardous household waste and solid waste'recycling. Traffic Element - Goal areas include accommodating future growth, maintaining uncongested local traffic ways, safe transportation and the creation of alternative transportation for recreation and leisure purposes. - Pursuit of an in town shuttle system. - Scenic Street program. - Reduction of accidents in targeted areas by eliminating obstacles to vehicle and traffic safety. Open Space and Recreation Element - Provide recreational opportunities and facilities that promote the spirit of the community through the age of "The family that plays together stays together" and an open space retention and enhancement program to enrich the quality of life as well as enhance the property values and community aesthetics. - Beautification of streetscapes and vistas. - Creation of educational interpretive trails. - Focus on teen activities. Housing Element - Directed towards the preservation and maintenance of stable neighborhoods and revitalization of declining neighborhoods, to arrest the deterioration of neighborhoods through redevelopment strategies and to meet the current and future housing needs. - Assistance to individuals, through both special programs "bootstrapping" and h)an programs, who desire to improve their homes and neighborhoods. - Outreach program to all neighborhoods. CAPITALIMPROVEMENTPROGRAM I Coastal Management Element - Co~l~ue programs for the protection, conservation and enhancement of the natural coastal environment; add to the overall economic development of the City and enhance efforts in preparing for and handling disasters within the coastal region. - Additional marina and mooring facilities. - Enhanced beach accessibility. Wake control to preserve wddhfe Future Land Use Element - Develop remaining vacant land to enhance the existing quality of life, compliment existing land use and result in a predominantly residential community; growth shall occur in a manner where development will be serviceable; blighted areas shall be redeveloped and be the major contributing areas to the renaissance of the City and the public school system shall contribute to the stabilization of neighborhoods. - Historic Preservation as a cornerstone for creating an identity for the City. - More efficient development and redevelopment coordination process. Capital Projects As identified in the Comprehensive Plan, a mature community at 87% build-out, focuses not upon accommodating future growth but upon quality development of remaining vacant areas and redevelopment of areas which are in a state of decline or deterioration. Internally, the City is continuing its efforts to establish the funding of renewal and replacement programs to maintain the condition of existing and new improvements. Specific allocations are set aside to provide for the remedial needs the City experiences as it matures on annual basis as follows: Housing $300,000 Scenic Streets $50,000 Park Facilities $100,000 Street Resurfacing $250,000 Alleys & Intersections $50,000 Water & Sewer Mains $400,000 Water Meters & Hydrants $100,000 Lift Stations and Manholes $150,000 These items will typically be funded out of current operating revenues as opposed to bonds, such as the General Capital Improvement Fund, Water and Sewer New Capital Outlay or the Water and Sewer Renewal and Replacement Fund. The following depicts, in broad categories where the emphasis in improvements is funded. It should also be mentioned this represents only those projects identified in the capital improvement budget, therefore, additional capital funding may be included in another operating fund. Such is the case for the housing programs and the bootstrap program. These are funded in the By Male~'Cate~i*rY Community Development Fund. Neighborhoods The following pages provide the Dr-lnage Capital Improvement Program as it is presently scheduled for the five year period 1995 to 1999. The Capital B eauttflcattort Improvement Budget is presented under the FY 1994195 column. For comparison features, the current FY 1993/94 is shown. The presentation Water & Sewer I I I t I ;',OOQ 4.00~ 6,000 I,OOO I 0.000 (ooo) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM follows a cash flow format in order for the reader to understand where the funding sources are derived for the listed projects. Uncommitted or reserved fund balances available for capital projects, renewal and replacement, and emergencies are also disclosed. DEBT MANAGEMENT AND FUNDING POLICY Management of Debt Prior to the issuance of any new debt, the City will review and determine that every effort has been made to comply with the following: · The amount of debt service for General Obligation and Special Revenue debt shall not exceed 20% of the General Fund revenues. · Wherever possible, the City will use Revenue, Self-Supporting or Special Assessment Bonds instead of General Obligation Bonds. · The overall net debt attributable to the General Fund shall not exceed an amount equal to $1,200.00 per capita. · The length of a Bond Issue shall relate to the useful life of the projects which it is financing. · Each proposed borrowing shall analyze the impact of the future debt service upon projections of operating revenues and expenditures and the City Commission must make a finding that the impact will not diminish the City's ability to continue to provide services. · Long-term borrowing shall be used only for capital projects listed in the Capital Project Schedule of the Capital Improvement Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Overall Debt Position Direct Debt Net Debt Per Capita % Assessed Value General Obligation Debt $27,595,000 $567.29 1.11% Non Self-Supporting Revenue Debt 12,685,000 260.78 .51% Self-Supporting Revenue Debt 63,445,000 1,304.28 2.56% Total Direct Debt $103,725,000 $2,132.35 4.18% Total Overlapping Debt (PBC) $20,393,250 $419.24 .83% Total Direct and Overlapping Debt $124,118,250 $2,551.59 5.01% Source~,: U~ M' FL, Bureau o{ Economic Business Research. 1993 Population Est. 48,644 and the Palm Beach Counl~ Property Appraisal'. I~elimiaa~ Asae~_-__-d_ Value $2.480.167,323. Impact of Capital Spending on the Operating Budget General Fund Debt Service The issuance of General Obligations bonds is the major funding mechanism for general purpose capital improvement projects. The payment of the associated G.O. debt service, therefore has the most direct impact upon operations. The Phase II-Decade of Excellence completed the voter approved issues and resulted in an increase in debt millage of .178 mills per $1,000 of assessed value. The following represents the percentage of the General Funding attributable to the retirement of debt for FY 1995: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM General Fund Revenues $41,083,630 General Obligation Debt $2,515,914 Debt Service as a % of G.F. Operating 6.21% The following schedule summarizes the Outstanding Debt by Category and the Bond Requirements to Maturity. SUMMARY OF OUTSTANDING DEBT BY CATEGORY Principal Outstanding Category as of 9/30/94 Security Cigarette Tax Bonds 70,000 Cigarette Taxes Series 1965 Utility Tax Revenue Bonds 12,615,000 Public Service Tax Series 1992 General Obligation Bonds 920,000 Property Tax Series 1972 General Obligation Bonds 200,000 Property Tax Series 1975 General Obligation Bonds 2,545,000 Property Tax Series 1990 General Obligation Bonds 4,885,000 Property Tax Series 1992 General Obligation Bonds 19,045,000 Property Tax Series 1993 Water & Sewer Revenue 7,530,000 Water & Sewer Revenue Bonds Series 1988 Water & Sewer Revenue 15,355,000 Water & Sewer Revenue Bonds Sedes 1991 A & B Water & Sewer Revenue Bd 40,560,000 Water & Sewer Revenue Series 1993 A & B O0 '° ~$~ ~ __ i~ ~ O ~ -- ~0~~0~0~0000~ ~ o ~~0000000000000000 MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER~~ SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM $ /O ~ - MEETING OF MAY 17. 1994 TRANSMITTAL OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1/BLOOD'S HAMMOCK GROVES DATE: MAY 13, 1994 This is public hearing for transmittal of a Future Land Use Plan Map amendment which includes a change from County MR-5 (Medium ReSidential-5 units per acre) to City Land Use designations of LD (Low Density 39 acres), MD (Medium Density 40 acres), CC (Commercial Core 10 acres) and OS (Open Space 4 acres) for Blood's Hammock Grove located on the south side of Linton Boulevard, east of Military Trail. The 93 acre property is being processed as a part of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1, transmitted to the State Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for review. Recommend transmittal of Future Land Use Plan Map Amendment for Blood's Hammock Grove properties. SIEMON, LARSEN & MARSH Mizner Park 433 Plaza Real, Suite 339 Boca Raton, Flofi~ 33432 ~atborn Station Tel~ho~ (~ 368-3808 Su~ 350 47 W~ Po~ Sttmst F~a~ile (~ 368-4008 198~ M~Anh~ Hou~v~ Chicco, HI~ 60605 ~e, C~ffom~ 92715 (312) 939-7117 April 26, 1994 (714) 752-1538 City Manager .-~4/4nr /.~ 100 NW 1st Avenue · Delray Beach, Florida 33444 0~0~/~ RE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Blood's Hammock Groves¢~ Dear Mr. Harden: Over the past week, we have worked to respond to the issues raised by the public and the Planning & Zoning Board at the public hearing held April lSth. We believe that we can more fully respond to the concerns of the Planning & Zoning Board and staff. We understand that notice of the public hearing has already been provided, and that we will therefore be obligated to appear on May 3, 1994. We are asking for a continuance until May 17th, but the Commission will not decide whether to continue the hearing until May 3. We will be prepared to move forward on May 3, 1994, if the Commission does not agree to have a continuance, but most of the additional material would not be available for staff and Commission review in advance. We appreciate your assistance with this matter. If you have any additional questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Lee D. Einsweiler, AICP Senior Planner Authorized Representative Norman Blood/Levitt Homes, Inc. vbs:LDE cc: Susan Ruby Alison Hardee Diane Dominguez CITY COMMISSION DOCUMENTATION TO: DAVID T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER THRU: DIANE DOMINGUEZ, DIRECTOR ENT~LANNING AND ZONING FROM: PAUL DORLING, P~NCIPAL PLANNER * NOTE: APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED A CONTINUANCE OF THIS ITEM TO THE MAY 17 MEETING. SUBJECT: MEETING OF MAY 3, 1994 FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENT FROM COUNTY MR-5 TO CITY LAND USE DESIGNATIONS OF LD (LOW DENSITY)~ MD (MEDIUM DENSITY)~ CC (COMMERCIAL CORE)~ AND OS (OPEN SPACE) . FOR THE BLOODS GROVE PROPERTY. ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION: The action requested of the City Commission is that of transmittal of a Future Land Use Plan Map amendment and Comprehensive Plan text amendment which includes the. following components: * A Future Land Use Map change from County MR-5 (Medium Residential-5 units per acre) to City Land Use designations of LD (Low Density - 39 acres), MD (Medium Density - 40 acres), CC (Commercial Core - 10 acres) and OS (Open Space - 4 acres) for Bloods Grove. * Text change to the commercial core definition in the Future Land Use Map element of the Comprehensive Plan * Locational change of the future city collector street currently proposed along the west border of the Bloods Grove property. The 93 acre property is being processed as a part of Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1. The property is located on the south side of L£nton Boulevard east of Military Trail. BACKGROUND: With the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan in November, 1989, "advisory" land use designations were applied to all areas which were outside the City limits but within the City's Planning Area. The 110 acre Bloods Grove site was given advisory designations as follows: 40 acres Medium Density Residential, 39 acres Low Density Residential, 17 acres Community Facilities, 10 acres Commercial Core, and 4 acres Open Space. The 17 acres of Community Facilities have been annexed for a municipal fire station, park and School Site S. The 93 acre balance is the subject of this request. Bloods Land Use Amendment City Commission May 3, 1994 Page 2 Separate petitions have been submitted and are currently being processed for the annexation of the property into the City limits and for initial zoning designations of PRD-Planned Residential Development (83 acres) and SAD-Special Activities District (10 acres). The PRD and SAD zoning districts require submittal of a master development plan and site plan, respectively. Once those plans have been submitted the requests will be reviewed and scheduled for Planning and Zoning Board and City Commission action. ANALYSIS: The proposed amendment will adopt the City's existing advisory designations with the exception of the location of the 10 acres of Commercial Core. This 10 acres is to be relocated from the center of the site to the area occupied by the existing Bloods commercial operation (northeast corner of the site along Llnton Boulevard). The Bloods will be maintaining ownership of the 10 acres and desire to continue and expand on the existing fruit packing and retail operation. The amendment also proposes text changes to the Commercial Core definition which would limit the type of commercial uses allowed within Commercial Core. The Low Density (0-5 units per acre) is proposed along the east and south borders adjacent to the Foxe Chase and Del Alre subdivisions; the Medium Density (5-12 units per acre) is proposed adjacent to the commercial and office uses to the west as well as along Military Trail; and the Open Space accommodates an existing Hammock area. The amendment also includes the relocation of the proposed city collector road currently cited along the west property line of Bloods Grove. Concerns were noted regarding two aspects of the applicant's proposal. These involve impacts created by moving the commercial component closer to Linton, which would attract more outside traffic, and the proposal to eliminate a connecting road between Germantown Road and the new collector road. To mitigate the impacts of the relocation of the commercial component, staff recommended a designation of Transitional, as opposed to Commercial Core. This would have the effect of limiting the intensity of allowable non-residential uses. Regarding the road connection, staff notes that it is a concern which requires additional analysis. It may be necessary to require an alternative site plan for the Bloods property which would provide the road in the event that it is deemed to be necessary. The attached Planning and Zoning staff report describes the issues in greater detail. Bloods Land Use Amendment City Commission May 3, 1994 Page 3 A traffic study has been submitted and its conclusions accepted by the Palm Beach Traffic Division. The study emphasizes that Military Trail which currently fails level of service D, will require widening from ¢ to 6 lanes under the current, as well as the proposed Land Use designations. The study further notes that at different phases of development improvements to the intersection of Military Trail and Clint Moore Road and the widening of Military Trail (4 lanes to 6 lanes) from Atlantic Avenue south to Clint Moore Road will be required. With these improvements traffic concurrency will be met. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION= The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed the Future land Use Amendment at the April 18, 1994 regular meeting. Eleven people spoke in opposition at the public hearing. They included representatives from adjacent homeowner associations ( Foxe Chase, Del Ida, Bel Aire) who opposed the amendment citing increase density (lack of compatibility) and increased traffic.. Several Board members expressed concern with the increase in density, increased traffic, and the relocation of the commercial core component. After a lengthy public discussion the Board recommended the Commercial Core designation be changed to Transitional, and that it remain in the current location (central to the site). The Board also included a restriction that the interior commercial component not be allowed to develop until Blood's packing and retail operation is discontinued. The Board further recommended that the amount of acreage allocated to MD (Medium Density) be reduced so that the land use designations are as follows (see attached exhibit)= * 63 acres of Low Density * 16 acres Medium Density * 10 acres Transitional * 4 acres Open Space The applicants request would have allowed a maximum of 480 multi-family and single family attached units and 195 single family detached units for a total of (675 units). The applicant intention is to construct 250 multi-family units, 175 attached single family units, and 200 single family detached units for a total of 625 units. Under the Planning and Zoning Board's recommendation a total of 507 units (192 multi-family units and 315 single family units) could be built. It is noted that a minimum of 21 acres of Medium Density residential would be required to build the proposed 250 unit multi-family development indicated in the conceptual master plan. The Planning and Zoning Board recommendation regarding the Commercial Core leaves the Bloods operation in an uncertain status. It would only be allowed to continue until the interior commercial component is developed. This differs significantly from the Blood's proposal, which is to augment the existing operation with compatible retail and office uses in a market-like setting. Bloods Land Use Amendment City Commission May 3, 1994 Page 4 ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: A. Continue with direction. B. By motion, based upon a finding that the proposed land use classifications are consistent with those that were previously approved with the adoption of the City's advisory land use classifications for unincorporated areas; and that the intensity of the commercial uses and compatibility with adjacent properties can be further addressed through the processing of a Master Site and Development Plan and the adoption of a Special Activities District, transmit the proposed amendment as part of Plan Amendment 94-1 (select one option): 1. Applicants proposal: A change from County MR-5 to City designations of 39 acres LD (Low Density), 40 acres of MD (Medium Density), 10 acres CC (Commercial Core) along Linton Boulevard, 4 acres of OS (Open Space); language changes to the Commercial Core; and relocation of the City's collector roadway; or 2. Staff recommendation to P&Z: A change from County MR-5 to City designations of 39 acres LD (Low Density), 40 acres MD (Medium Density), 10 acres of Transitional along Linton Boulevard, and 4 acres OS (Open Space); recommend no change to the text of Commercial Core; and relocation of the City's collector roadway; or 3. Planninq and Zoninq Board recommendation: A change from County MR-5 to City designations of 63 acres of LD (Low Density), 16 acres MD (Medium Density), 10 acres Transitional in the center of the site and 4 acres of OS (Open Space); recommend no changes to the text of Commercial Core; and relocation of the City's collector roadway; C. Deny the FLUM designation changes based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to compatibility . Bloods Land Use Amendment City Commission May 3, 1994 Page 5 RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, based upon a finding that the proposed land use classifications are consistent with those that were previously approved with the adoption of the City's advisory land use classifications for unincorporated areas; and that the intensity of the commercial uses and compatibility with adjacent properties can be further addressed through the processing of a Master Site and Development Plan and the adoption of a Special Activities District, transmit the proposed amendment as part of Plan Amendment 94-1 for a change from County MR-5 to City designations of 39 acres LD (Low Density), 40 acres MD (Medium Density), 10 acres of Transitional along Llnton Boulevard, and 4 acres OS (Open Space); recommend no change to the text of Commercial Core; and relocation of the City's collector roadway. Attachment: * Planning and Zoning Board report of April 18, 1994 * P&Z recommendation Land Use Map a:bloccdoc.doc LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT PLANNING AND .ONING BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH --- S]AFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: April 18, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: V.C. ITEM: Future Land Use Map Amendment Changing the FLUM Designation from County MR-5 to the Following City Designations: OS, LDR, MDR & CC; for Blood's Hammock Groves GENERAL DATA: O~na~e ................... #oraan ¥. Elm Agent .................... Zee gtn~veile~, AICP PEo~y SLzo ............ 93 iCFOl X~t~ ~t~y ~oidenttal, ~[ll Co~, ~a S~ce Coun[y ~md Uae Plan ..... ~-5 (Residential, ~ [o S PFo~I~ ~ UIO Plan...~nft~a~ton of ezLoti~ Ci~y 8dvioo~ delL~/o~ · county ZoflLng ............ ~ (~rL~Z~aX ~oe~e) P~o~s~ Zoning .......... ~ (S~aA DLo~Lc~) p~ (pX~ ReeLden~Aal ~elopa~) (mlttple r~ly Reotdefl~tel ~s[~ ~ (R~t~t/al ~a~tt/oflal R~td~ttal ) Voot~ A, ~ ~ (Pla~ Office MtdenZta~ - P~) Exts~tng ~nd Uae ........ A ~ton of in exalting or,ge grove P~o~s~ ~nd uses ....... ~0 ac~e fscllity c~tal uses, approxtM~ely 21 acreo of nlt~-f~lly (250 uflA~s) ~ app~oxl~Cely single f~/ly de~ach~ (175 vilLAS) a~ a[[ach~ (200 untie), wt[h 4 4 4c~e h~ p~ese~e a~ea. Wa[er Se~Lce ............ EILItLAg Old ~t~ R~d way. ExAlting 10' valor ~tfl tn Ltntofl ~uleva~. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD: The item before the Board is that of making a recommendation on a privately initiated Future Land Use Map Amendment and Comprehensive Plan text amendment which includes the following components: * changing the land use designation from County MR-5 (Medium Density Residential- 5 units per acre) to a combination of City LD (Low Density Residential 0-5 units per acre), MD (Medium Density Residential 5-12 units per acre), CC (Commercial Core) and OS (Open Space); * text change to the Commercial Core definition in the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. * locational change of the future City collector street currently proposed along the west border of the Bloods Grove property. The subject property is approximately 93 acres and represents the balance of the Bloods Grove property after the recent annexation of the 17 acres of the municipal fire station, park and School Site S. BACKGROUND: With the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan in November, 1989, "advisory" land use designations were applied to all areas which were outside the City limits but within the City's Planning Area. The 110 acre Bloods Grove site was given advisory designations as follows: 40 acres Medium Density Residential, 39 acres Low Density Residential, 17 acres Community Facilities, 10 acres Commercial Core, and 4 acres Open Space. The 17 acres of Com~___unit¥ Facilities was intended to accommodate a future elementary school site, neighborhood park, and fire station in the southwest portion of the City. On Nove~r 26, 1991 the City annexed 1.808 of the 110 acres, at the northeast corner of the property via Ordinance 76-91. The 1.808 acres consisted of an access easement as well as a temporary and permanent fire station site. The temporary fire station was placed on the site while the permanent fire station was constructed. Fire station # 5 has since been completed and the temporary station removed. In April, 1993, an annexation petition, land use plan amendment and initial zoning request to accommodate a 10 acre elementary school site on the Taheri property adjacent to Bloods Grove was submitted. Before those actions were formally processed, the School Board reconsidered that location and instead chose a 10 acre site in the northeast portion of Bloods Grove. As a part of the School District's purchase contract the City is to locate a municipal park contiguous to the school site. P & Z Staff Rep¢ Future Land Use ._,p Amendment Page 2 In April, 1993 the owners of Bloods Grove granted agency to the City for the processing of an annexation petition and all land development applications necessary to accommodate a 10 acre elementary school (School Site S) and 6 acre municipal park. The change in land use from MD (Medium Density Residential) to CF (Community Facilities) was processed with Land Use Plan Amendment 93-2. The related annexation and initial zoning were approved by City Commission on March 22, 1994. The Conditional Use request to establish the school was approved by City Commission at its meeting of April 5, 1994. On April 8, 1994 the sale of the school site to Palm Beach County School Board and the park site to the City was consummated. A Land Use Map change for 93 acres (balance of Bloods Grove) from the County Land Use Map designation of MR-5 to the City LD (Low Density), MD (Medium Density), OS (Open Space), and CC (Commercial Core) is now before the Board. A concurrent annexation and initial zoning request are being processed and will be before the Board at a later meeting. P R 0 J E C T D E S C R I P T I 0 N: The land under consideration is the balance of the Bloods Grove commercial orange orchard operation. It is approximately 93. acres in area and is located south of Linton Boulevard, east of Military, west of the Foxe Chase (residential) Subdivision, and north of Del Aire Subdivision. The majority of the 93 acre site is an active orange grove with a packing and shipping operation. The development proposal represents the redistribution of existing advisor~ City land use designations. The proposed redistribution will move the 10 acre "Commercial Core" designation from the center of the site to the northeast corner of the site to cover the existing Bloods operation. The reason for this relocation of the commercial uses is that the Bloods will be maintaining ownership of the 10 acres and desire to continue the existing commercial operation. The 83 acre balance of the site is proposed for development under the current City Land Use designations. The development proposal includes 250 apartments, 175 attached units, 200 single family homes and a 4 acre open space (Hammock area) by the Levitt Corporation. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS: Current Land Use Designations: The current County Land Use designation for the site is MR-5 (Medium Residential-5 units per acre). The City's current advisory land use designations for the site are as follows: 40 acres of MD (Medium Density), 39 acres of LD (Low Density), 4 acres of OS (Open Space), and 10 acres of CC (Commercial Core). P & Z Staff Rep¢ Future Land Use ..~p Amendment Page 3 Requested Land Use Designations: The requested Land Use changes are the same as the City Advisory Land Use designations in total acreage per category. However, a change in the location of the 10 acre commercial core component from its current position internal .to the site to one which has frontage along Llnton Boulevard is proposed. Adjacent Land Use MaD Designations & Land Use: FLUM Designations: City County Subject property: Low Res (1-5 du) MR-5 Res Med Density (5-12 du) Commercial Core Open Space Adjacent properties: North Low Density & CF N/A East Low Res (1-5 du) LR-1 Res South Low Res (1-5 du) & OS N/A West Transitional MR-5 Res Actual Land Use: Subject property: Commercial orange grove Adjacent properties: North Shadywoods (residential) East Foxe Chase (residential) Subdivision, fire station #5,school site S, and future park site South Del Air subdivision and Del Airs golf course West South County Professional Office center, South County Mental Health Facility, and La Casa subdivision. Allowable Land Uses: Under the proposed residential FLUM designations (Low Density and Medium Density) residential zoning districts which accommodate single family to multi- family units are allowed. Under the Open Space FLUM designations the OS and CF zoning designations allow open spaces and facilities which serve public and semi public uses. The proposed Commercial Core FLUM is consistent with RM (Residential Medium),CBD (Central Business District), RT (Resort Tourism), RS (Residential Office), CF (Community Facilities), OS (Open Space), and SAD (Special Activities District). The applicant has requested initial zoning designations of PRD (Planned Residential Development) and SAD (Special Activity District). These zoning designations are consistent with the proposed land uses. P & Z staff Rep¢ Future Land Use ,.-,p Amendment Page 4 Service and Concurren¢~ Implications: In the preparation of the Delray Beach Comprehensive Plan, the land use designations throughout the entire planning and service area were considered in the overall land use pattern, assessment of level of service, the provision of services, and meeting remaining land use needs. The proposed land use designations are the same as those previously considered. Thus, the act of officially adopting the City's "Advisory" Land Use designations has no impact with respect to general notions of service delivery and concurrency. However, as the FLUM change is technically from MR-5 (County) to the City Advisory designations of LD,MD,OS,and CC the difference in intensity with respect to traffic impact must be assessed. The maximum development potential under the current MR-5 FLUM designation would be 465 single family units generating 4,650 daily trips. The maximum development potential under the City's advisory land use designations of LD, MD OP, and CC will be 200 single family, 468 multi-family, and 108,900 sq.ft, of commercial use generating a total of 8,496 dally trips. The difference is an additional 3,846 daily trips. A traffic study was submitted and Linton Boulevard meets traffic concurrency. Military Trail is noted as currently failing traffic concurrency from Atlantic Avenue south to Clint Moore Road. Military Trail will require 6 laning prior to development under the existing Land Use Designation. The proposed FLUM amendment will not increase the traffic volumes to a level which would require additional improvements over and above the 6 laning already required. While Linton Boulevard passed traffic concurrency the portion between Military Trail east to Waterford Place required analysis under a more detailed test (alternative Test 1). One portion of the roadway, the intersection of Llnton Boulevard and 1-95, did not pass the alternative test. An additional analysis was undertaken for this intersection which estimated a reduced impact based upon traffic diversion with the opening of the Congress Avenue/I-95 interchange. When the resulting reduced traffic volumes were utilized the Linton Boulevard and 1-95 intersection also passed the alternative test. The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic study and has tentatively accepted the conclusions within that report. Prior to the approval of any development on the site, improvements to the traffic system which accommodates that development must be in place or programmed. P & Z staff Rep¢ Future Land Use ..~p Amendment Page 5 Land Use Compatibility: The proposed distribution of the residential land use designations maximizes compatibility with adjacent_ land use designations. The LD (Low Density residential) is proposed along the south and west borders adjacent the Low Density land use designations of Foxe Chase to the east and Del Alre to the south. The majority of the MD (Medium Density Residential) Land Use designation is proposed along Linton Boulevard and adjacent to the "Transitional" land use designations which border the site to the west. The "Commercial Core" component which is noted internal to the site in the existing City advisory designations is proposed for relocation to Llnton Boulevard. The applicant has indicated the relocation of the commercial component is to accommodate the existing Bloods packing house and to establish up to an additional 50,000 sq.ft, of commercial uses. The additional uses are primarily intended to serve the neighborhood and local residents. Compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood can be enhanced through the provision of pedestrian and bicycle access, and landscape buffers. While the residential Land Use designations are compatible with the adjacent and surrounding land use designations this compatibility does not relate to any specific development proposals. The proposed zoning classification of PRD and SAD require the concurrent processing of site development plans. The findings related to the PRD are extensive and address compatibility issues. The SAD requires approval of a specific list of uses, which can only be modified by amending the SAD ordinance. With the processing of the PRD and SAD plans, compatibility with respect to the intensity of the commercial uses, the size of lots and residential structures, landscape buffers, etc will be addressed in detail. Commercial Core Designation: Although the commercial is no longer completely interior to the site, the applicant has proposed to retain the Commercial Core designation and its original intent through the modification of the Commercial Core text within the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The following underlined changes to the Commercial Core definition in the Comprehensive Plan are proposed: P & Z Staff Rep¢ Future Land Use ..up Amendment Page 6 Commercial Core: This designation is applied to the Community's downtown areas. It can also be applied to a commercial component of a planned residential development, when that component Is Internally orientedt with no direct access to an arterial roadway. The Commercial Core designation includes the "Village Center" development scenario described tn the Future Land Use Element and graphically shown in Figure L-8. It accommodates a variety of uses Including commercial and office development; residential land use upper story apartments;older homes renovated to accommodate office use; and uses such as "bed and breakfast" establish; and industrial/commerce uses as proposed in the "Village Center" development scenario, and in the Blood's Grove commercial component. While this modification to the language in the land use plan can be accommodated, It may be best to change the proposed land use designation itself. With the relocation of the commercial component to the perimeter of the site and the Inclusion of the Bloods operation, It might be best to seek an alternative designation that will ensure that the commercial uses are neighborhood oriented. An alternative to changing the language in the plan and placing the Commercial Core designation on the current Bloods operation is to apply a "Transitional" land use designation to the 10 acre parcel. An SAD zoning could then be applied which would incorporate the Bloods operation, as well as office and commercial uses that are less Intense than those permitted with a Commercial Core designation. Implementation and Direction of the Comprehensive Plan: There are a few policies contained within the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan which give direction with respect to providing specific facilities within the southwest area of the City. The ANALYSIS portion of the Open Space and Recreation Element Identifies the need to locate a park in the southwest quadrant of the City. It specifically states that "the siting of a neighborhood park, similar to Barwick Park but with a softball field and all purpose field Is needed for adequate service". Concurrency with respect to the park and recreation element is met in the southwest portion of the City through recent acquisition of the southwest park and provision of a ball field and two (2) all-purpose fields with development of the southwest park and elementary school. Cltywide concurrency is being met through conversion of existing facilities to all-purpose fields, and provision of recreational facilities in new parks and schools. P & Z Staff Rep¢ Future Land Use ..up Amendment Page 7 The following improvements have occurred since the last update of the Parks and Recreation Element: * Construction of Barwick Middle School with 4 tennis .courts, 4 basketball courts, softball, 1 baseball, and one soccer field. * Construction of Banyon Creek Elementary School with 2 basketball courts, 1 softball field, 1 volleyball court. * Improvements to Atlantic High School (lighting) 2 baseball diamonds and playing field. TRAFFIC CIRCULATIONs City Collector Aliqnment: The proposed FLUM change Includes a change in the location of a proposed City Collector. The current street is shown on the Future Land Use Map along the west property line and through the middle of the adjacent Holland property. The proposed location is the central spine road aligned with Palm Forest Way (Shadywoods), proceeds south to about the center of the site, and then west through the Taheri property. The portion of the spine road which is continued south through the Bloods site and west to Military Trail is proposed as a private gated roadway and is not part of the City collector system. The relocation has no negative effects on surrounding properties. The relocation substantially improves the ability to develop the Holland property northwest of the site, as the current proposed roadway location dissects the parcel. Germantown Roadway Aligrunent: During the processing of the FLUM amendment for the school and park site a realignment of Germantown Road was proposed. The realignment extended Germantown Road west through the Bloods site and then north to Linton Boulevard at Palm Forest Way. A temporary access for the school and park was proposed from the western extension of Germantown Road north to intersect Llnton Boulevard at right angles where Germantown currently meets Linton Boulevard. The temporary access was to be removed with development of the permanent alignment. The existing traffic light at the temporary access was then to be moved to the permanent alignment (Palm Forest way and Linton Boulevard). With the relocation of the commercial operation to Linton Boulevard the extension of Germantown Road to the proposed spine road (permanent alignment) is not provided. The reason for the elimination of the connection is to preserve the vegetation and ambience at the entrance to Blood's Grove operation. Under the current proposal the temporary access would become permanent and serve the school, park, and commercial core property. The projected spine road at Linton Boulevard and Palm Forest Way will provide access to future residential development within Bloods Grove and alternative access to the school, park and commercial area. P & Z Staff Rep, Future Land Use ..ap Amendment Page 8 Information with respect to how the two intersections (temporary and permanent) would affect signalization along Llnton Boulevard was requested and has not been provided. Staff members of the County Traffic Division have stated that the minimum spacing between Signals is 1000 feet. The two proposed intersections will be approximately 550 feet apart. The Traffic Division indicated the existing traffic light would stay at the Germantown / Llnton intersection until the traffic volume at the spine road ( Palm Forest / Lint on intersection ) warrant signalization. At that point the existing light would most likely be relocated. The signal relocation would leave traffic from Germant own Road, the school s ire, park and Bloods commercial operation intersecting Llnton Boulevard at a non signalized intersection. The original proposal and alignment would have all traffic intersecting Llnton Boulevard at the signalized intersection at Ltnton and Palm Forest. It is possible that the school/park intersection can be installed at a location that is east of the current proposal. The additional distance may provide adequate spacing to allow both intersections' to be signalized. The location of the intersections and the prospects for signalization must be addressed with submission of the master sate plan for the development. RE V I E W BY OTHERS: The land use amendment request is not in a geographic area requiring review by either the HPB (Historic Preservation Board), DDA (Downtown Development Authority), or the CRA (Community Redevelopment Agency). Courtesy notices were sent to: * Palm Beach County Planning * City of Boca Raton * Helen Coopersmith (PROD) * Erminio P. Gulliano (Foxe Chase) * Saul Weinburger, (Del Aire ) * Jim Goggin (Country Lake Association) * Shadywoods Homeowners Association. * Spanish Wells Condo Association * Gretchen Bacon, Oakmont Residential Assoc. ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSIONS: The proposed FLUM amendment generates several concerns relating to the relocation of the commercial uses which are summarized in the following paragraphs. These include: P & Z staff Rep¢ Future Land Use ..dp Amendment Page 9 Commercial Corm= The original intent of the Commercial Core designation was to primarily serve the commercial needs of the surrounding subdivision. The proposed relocation and accommodation of the existing Bloods operation differs in some respects from the intent of the Commercial Core. An alternative to applying a "Commercial Core" designation is to apply a Transitional land use. The current and proposed uses are consistent with uses allowed under those zoning designations allowed under the Transitional land use designation. This alternative would provide some limitations on the level and intensity of future uses. Alignment of Germantown Road= With the negotiations of the school site and park site the extension of Germantown Road was proposed. The applicant agreed to this alignment at that time. With the relocation of the commercial component the applicant has proposed elimination of a portion of the alignment to maintain the ambience of the existing entry. The elimination of the extension may negatively effect signalization of related intersections with Linton Boulevard. This issue must be resolved with the processing of the master site plan and development activity of the school site. The next steps in the development process will be annexation and initial zoning of the property. Each of the proposed zoning designations, PRD and SAD, also require concurrent submittal of master plans. Some of the issues identified in this report i.e. Germantown Road alignment; and compatibility of site specific plans with adjacent existing land use types are to be resolved at these stages. A L T E R N A T I V E S: A. Continue with direction. B. Recommend approval of the FLUM designation change from County MR-5 to City LD (Low Density), CC (Commercial Core), OS (Open Space); language changes to the Commercial Core; and relocation of the City's collector roadway subject to conditions; C. Recommend approval of the FLUM designation change from County MR-5 to City LD (Low Density), MD (Medium Density), Transitional, and OS (Open Space); recommend no change to the text of Commercial Core; and relocation of the City's collector roadway subject to conditions; P & Z staff Rep¢ Future Land Use ..=p Amendment Page 10 D. Recommend denial of the FLUM designation changes based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to compatibility (location of commercial component). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: By motion: Recommend approval of the FLUM designation change from County MR-5 to City LD (Low Density), MD (Medium Density), Transitional, and OS (Open Space); recommend no change to the text of Commercial Core; and relocation of the City's collector roadway, based upon a finding that the proposed land use classifications are consistent with those that were previously approved with the adoption of the City's advisory land use classifications for unincorgorated areas; and that the intensity of the commercial uses and compatibility with adjacent properties can be further addressed through the processing of a Master Site and Development Plan and the adoption of a Special Activities District. Pm[ Plaza Linton Oa~ (10 ac,) Square S. County Mental Health Walmart i · '" i"- ,~.~o,,~i. , v=,,, .... ..... ..,:...:-...':'.'.', ,, .... Country Lalr, ee Tnheri Church Bel.~klru Medium Density Residential (M~-R) 40 acru Blood's Hammock Groves LowDeasityResideatial(Ll)-R) ,,acr~ Future Land Use Map Amendment Commercial Cor~ (CC) 10 acr~ With Schematic Roadway Network Open Space (OS) 4 acres TOTAL .~, ~-~ .~ -: ~ ,~. ~t., .~_c~ PROPOSED LAND USES.~, ~ ,,~, RESIDENTIAL LAND USES INDUSTRIAL LAND USES COMMUNITY FACILITIES I ' ' ~, ~ ~ O -.ow D_~.s,TY o-. OU,ACRE · -'"DU.T.,A~ "@-.U.L,C EU,LD,.G~ '" ~ - RURAL RESIDENTIAL ~ - OPEN SPACE. ACTIVE C~ - CHURCHES . - GENERAL COMMERCIAL ~ - SUBJECT TO CONSERVATION ~OLICY B-1.2 REDEVELOPMENT AREAS DESIGNATE[ EXISTING LAND USES ~-, / / ~ ~ J ~~~ // / --- PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY. ' PROPOSE0 PAYMENT / ........... FU~R[ RICHT OF WAY ...... FU~R[ PA~ME~ ~ SCHOOL S~E "~ CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA AII-AmericaCity 1993 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CITY OF DELRAY BEACH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1 PAGE CONSERVATION ELEMENT 1 Policy A-1.4 (preservation of recharge areas) i Policy A-4.2 (water conservation) 2 Policy A-4.6 (canal water for irrigation) 2 Policy A-4.7 ("grey water" for irrigation) 3 Policy B-1.2 (preservation of key parcels) 3 Policy B-1.4 (wetland area along 1-95) 4 Policy B-3.2 (Lake Ida shoreline) PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT 6 Policy A-1.2 (ocean discharge) 6 Objective B-2 (water supply) 7 Policy B-2.1 (WWTP effluent recycling) 8 Policy B-2.5 (aquifer storage and recovery) 8 Policy B-3.1 (techniques to decrease water consumption) OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION ELEMENT 11 Policy B-2.5 (access to natural areas) 11 Policy B-2.6 (facilities in natural areas) HOUSING ELEMENT 12 Figure H-1 (development potential) 15 & 16 Table H-1 & H-2 (development potential) 18 Policy A-1.4 (sacred zoning) 18 Policy A-2.4 (sacred zoning) COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT 19 Coastal area population 19 Policy A-2.3 (multijurisdictional impacts on ICWW) 20 Policy A-4.1 (additional water dependent uses) 20 Policy A-4.3 (program implementation participation) 21 Policy B-1.4 (beach access) 22 Policy D-i.1 (hazard mitigation) 22 Policy D-1.2 (hurricane operations plan) 22 Policy D-4.1 (drainage improvements) FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT 24 Description of Planning Area 26 Table L-1 (existing land use inventory) 28 Figure L-4 (development potential) 29 Tables L-3 & L-4 (development potential) 32 Policy C-4.3 (CBD development plan) 32 Policy C-4.6 (educational institutions in Pineapple Grove) 33 Policy C-4.9 (capital improvement projects) 34 Commercial Core description PAGE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT 35 Policy A-i.1 (park and fire station in S.W.) 35 Policy A-3.10 (water and sewer enterprise bond) INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT 36 Policy A-2.3 (resolution of conflicts) REQUIREMENTS FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IMPLEMENTATION 37 Five year schedule of improvements PROCEDURES FOR MONITORING AND EVALUATION 45 List of projects/programs AMENDMENTS TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP 50 Blood's Grove SUPPORT DOCUMENTS Appendix 1 Delray Oaks 2 Water Rates 3 Wastewater Effluent Reuse 4 Emergency Management 5 Blood's Grove T: \advanced\contents PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1 CONSERVATION ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-A-13, Policy A-1.4 (NEW) Change: ADDITION Policy A-1.4 The City shall encouraqe the preservation of existinq groundwater recharqe areas throuqh sensitive site planninq. In the case of environmentally sensitive lands, such preservation may include sensitive development under "planned development" concepts, exaction (public sites dedication provisions of the Land Development Requlations), ... or acquisition (includinq the County Environmentally Sensitive Lands Acquisition. Program)· Comment: Policy strengthens the City's commitment to preserve existing groundwater recharge areas. See Support Document # 1 (Delray Oaks) for a complete discussion of this issue. 2. Location: Pg. III-A-15, Policy A-4.2 Policy A-4.2 Develop a standard of water use for various land uses (e.g. varying with lot sizes, bedrooms, common area, etc.) which equates to 110% of a reduction target and establish it as the limit of "reasonable" consumption. Then provide for a penalty payment (higher rate) for water consumption above the reasonable amount. This program shall be instituted in FY 92/93, if the rate of water consumption is not reduced through voluntary means. (cl) Change: DELETION Comment: See Support Document # 2 (Water Rates) for a complete discussion of this issue. 3. Location: Pg. III-A-15, Policy A-4.6 Policy A-4.6 Water which flows in canals shall be used wherever possible for irrigation of golf courses and open space areas. The possibility of such water use shall be explored during the review of any development plans which are in proximity of such a water source. This submittal requirement shall be included in the required updating of land use regulations which follows adoption of the Plan. (cl) Change: REVISION Policy A-4.6 Water which flows in canals or drainage lakes shall be used wherever possible for irrigation of golf courses and open space areas. The possibility of such water use shall be explored during the review of any development plans which are in proximity of such a water source. This submittal requirement shall be included in the required updating of land use regulations which follows adoption of the Plan. (cl) Comment: This requirement has been expanded to include all surface water bodies to better describe the intent of the policy. 4. Location: Pg. III-A-16, Policy A-4.7 Policy A-4.7 The City shall continue its present policy of requiring a water source, other than City water, for irrigation purposes in geographically defined areas of the City. The City shall also pursue the use of discharge water, from the Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, for irrigation purposes. This program shall be explored through the joint efforts of the District Board and the Cities of Boynton Beach and Delray Beach. This item is in the Regional Board FY 92/93 work program. Change: REVISION Policy A-4.Ta The City shall continue its present policy of requiring a water source, other than City water, for irrigation purposes in geographically defined areas of the City. Policy A-4.7b The Cityt through the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Board~ shall implement the "Northeast Quadrant Reclaimed Water System" project to reclaim a portion of the effluent from the Wastewater Treatment Plant for irrigation purposes. The City~ through the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Board~ shall also explore the feasibility of the reuse of wastewater effluent for groundwater recharge in FY 93/94. Based upon the results of this feasibility study, the City~ through the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Board, may develop Page 2 a program to fully implement the reclamation and reuse of sewaqe wastewater effluent in the future. (Also see Public Facilities Policy B-2.1 for related policy) ~111 ild6 ~~ t~6 dd6 df Comment: The policy is updated to reflect on-going project development and separated into a maintenance policy and a project specific policy. See Support Document # 3 (Wastewater Effluent Reuse) for a complete discussion of this issue. 5. Location: Pg. III-A-17, Policy B-1.2 Policy B-1.2 The Delray Oaks area of the Alfieri Pugliese Park of Commerce and Hurricane Pines along S.W. 10th Street should be preserved in part through sensitive site planning. Change: REVISION Policy B-1.2 The Delray Oaks area of the Alfieri Pugliese Park of Commerce shall be preserved throuqh sensitive development under "planned development" concepts,, exaction (public sites dedication provisions of the Land Development Regulations), or acquisition (including the County Environmentally Sensitive Lands Acquisition Program). The City shall participate with the County in seekin~ State fundinq for the acquisition of the Delray Oaks site and its development as a preservation area. ~ Hurricane Pines along $.W. 10th Street should be preserved in part through sensitive site planning. Comment: It is appropriate to strengthen this policy relating to the preservation of the Delray Oaks site in light of on-going partnership efforts by the City and County to acquire and preserve the site. These efforts include applications for State funding through Preservation 2000 and the on going negotiations by the County to purchase the site through the Environmentally Sensitive Lands Acquisition Program. See Support Document # 1 (Delray Oaks) for a complete discussion of this issue. 6. Location: Pg. III-A-17, Policy B-1.4 Policy B-1.4 Upon adoption of this Plan and through programs set forth in the Page 3 Intergovernmental Coordination Element, the City shall obtain the wetland area along 1-95 (c3). Change: DELETION Comment: It appears that Policy B-1.4 was not based on accurate data. The area in question is east of 1-95 on the south boundary of the City. Field investigation subsequent to Plan adoption shows that the area was never a wetlands habitat, but was and is a drainage ditch and the associated overbank. This property is owned by Palm Beach County and is zoned Open Space (OS) by the City. City does not need to obtain ownership to protect the area. 7. Location: Pg. III-A-18, Policy B-2.6 (NEW) Change: ADDITION Policy B-2.6 The City shall~ to the maximum extent feasible~ preserve~ conserved appropriately use and protect fisher%es~ wildlife and marine habitats which serve as habitat for endanqered and threatened plant and animal species. Comment: Policy strengthens the City's commitment to preserve endangered and threatened species. See Support Document # 1 (Delray Oaks) for a complete discussion of this issue .... 8. Location: Pg. III-A-18, Policy B-3.2 Policy B-3.2 Through intergovernmental efforts with the Lake Worth Drainage District and the South Florida Water Management District, a -- program for the protection of the shore line of Lake Ida shall be established. The City shall provide the lead through its Community Services _ Group. The program shall be developed by during FY 92/93. It shall address, among other items, the regulation of boat activity in order to reduce wave impact on the shore line. Change: REVISION Policy B-3.2 T~~ ~Z~~~ ~ff~ ~¢~ W~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ l~ The City supports Palm Beach County's program to restore and protect the shoreline of Lake Ida. In addition~ the City supports continuinq monitorinq of boatinq activity in the lake to assure that this activity does not produce adverse impacts on the shoreline. Comment: Palm Beach County, through its Parks and Environmental Resource Management Departments, has implemented a program to restore the shoreline of Lake Ida within Lake Ida Park. This program includes exotic removal, recontouring of the shoreline and recreation of a marsh habitat. The new shoreline and habitat is protected from boat wakes by a breakwater. This project has satisfied the need for shoreline protection although a need remains to monitor boating activity and its impact on the shoreline of Lake Ida. Page PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-B-22, Policy A-1.2 Policy A-1.2 Even though current standards for ocean discharge of effluent are being met, the use of ocean discharge may not, in the long term, be an acceptable method of disposal of effluent. A program for the reuse of effluent from the Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant shall be presented to the Regional Board by June 1, 1993. (See Policy B-2.1 Conservation Element Policy A-4.7 and see Intergovernmental Coordination Element for related policies). Change: REVISION Policy A-1.2 Even though current standards for ocean discharge of effluent are being met, the use of ocean discharge may not, in the long term, be an acceptable method ~f for the normal disposal of all~ or even the majority~ of effluent. A program to fully implement the reclamation and reuse of sewage effluent may be developed by the Clty~ through the Wastewater Treatment Facility Board in the future. ~ (See Policy B-2.1 Conservation Element Policy A-4.7b and see Intergovernmental Coordination Element for related policies). Comment: See Support Document # 3 (Wastewater Effluent Reuse) for a complete discussion of this item. 2. Location: Pg. III-B-24, Objective B-2 Objective B-2 Even though the City has projected an adequate water supply, it shall provide for increasing draw through increased use of existing wells as opposed to developing new wells, and it shall enhance the area's water supply through the development of different methods of providing water. This objective shall be met in the performance of the following: (2b) Change: REVISION Objective B-2 Even though the City has projected an adequate water supply, it shall provide for increasing draw and the potential of reduced capacity through salt water intrusion and/or extended drought conditions through increased use of existing wellst development of new wells and development of alternative technologies and methods of providing water. ~ ~~ ~ objective shall be met in the performance of the following: (2b) Comment: The scope of this objective is expanded to address the realities of salt water intrusion and drought impact, and to allow the exploration and development of new technologies. 3. Location: Pg. III-B-25, Policy B-2.1 Policy B-2.1 The alternative of enhancing the water supply through the recycling of discharge from the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), after tertiary treatment, and then used either as a source of potable water, and/or irrigation water, and/or aquifer recharge shall be explored through technical studies. Change: REVISION Policy B-2.1 Z~I~I ~2~[~ The Cityt through the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Board~ shall develop a program to implement the "Northeast Quadrant Reclaimed Water System" project to reclaim a portion of the effluent from the Wastewater Treatment Plant for irrigation purposes. The City~ through the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Board~ shall also explore the feasibility of the reuse of wastewater effluent for groundwater recharge in FY 93/94. Based upon the results of this feasibility study, the City, through the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Board~ may develop Page 7 - a program to fully implement the reclamation and reuse of sewaqe wastewater effluent in the future. (Also.see Conservation Policy A-4.Tb for related policy) Comment: See Support Document # 3 (Wastewater Effluent Reuse) for a complete discussion of this item. 4. Location: Pg. III-B-25, Policy B-2.5 (New) Change: ADDITION Policy B-2.5 The City shall develop a program to construct at least one Aquifer Storaqe and Recovery (ASR) well to supplement water supply durinq conditions of drought or well field contamination and as a method of balancing the demand on water supply wells durinq periods of high and low demand. This program shall include feasibility studies~ design~ and construction as warranted by the results of the feasibility studies. Comment: The relatively new technology of Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) has the potential to supplement water supply in Delray Beach by storage of treated water in the upper Floridan Aquifer during periods of low demand for later recovery and use during periods of high demand or during emergency conditions such as drought or well field contamination. 5. Location: Pg. III-B-25, Policy B-3.1 Policy B-3.1 The City shall maintain its program of responsible consumption of water (per capita basis) and shall decrease the overall per capita consumption of water by 10% from 1989 levels through continued implementation of the following techniques and programs: (Also see Objective A-4 of the Conservation Element). · maintaining its water rate structure which sets a higher uniform rate for consumption and decreases customer capacity charges in order to promote reductions in water consumption as well as establishment of conservation surcharges, based on South Florida Water Management District formulae, and keyed to various levels of drought alert; Page 8 · mandatory use of wells for irrigation purposes where conditions permit [LDR Section 7.7]; -- · enhanced enforcement of water use laws; · requirements for xeriscape landscaping alternatives to be considered for all new development during the review of site and development plans [LDR Section -- 4.6.16(E)]; and · continuation of the regular preventive -- maintenance program for water mains, pumps and meters (see related Policy C-4.3) _ Change: REVISION Policy B-3.1 The City shall maintain its program -- of responsible consumption of water (per capita basis) and shall decrease the overall per capita consumption of water by 10% from 1989 levels _ through continued implementation of the following techniques and programs: (Also see Objective A-4 of the Conservation Element). · maintaining its water rate structure which establishes an inverted block rate structure to set higher -- consumption rates for increased water use ¢~ZZ~ ¢~~ in order to promote reductions in water consumption as well as establishment of conservation surcharges, based on South Florida -- Water Management District formulae, and keyed to various levels of drought alert; -- · mandatory use of wells for irrigation purposes where conditions permit [LDR _ Section 7.7]; · continued ~~ enforcement of water use laws; -- · The consideration of ~~~ f~ xeriscape landscaping alternatives Z~ -- ~ ~~ for all new development during the review of site and development plans [LDR Section 4.6.16(E)]; and Page 9 -- · continuation of the regular preventive maintenance program for water mains, pumps and meters (see related Policy C-4.3) Comment: Changes in the third and fourth bullets are housekeeping items to update the statements. See Support Document # 2 (Water Rates) for a complete discussion of the changes in the first bullet. Page 10 OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-D-21, Policy B-2.5 (NEW) Change: ADDITION Policy B-2.5 .The City shall ensure public access to publicly owned natural areas that provide passive resource based facilities (i.e. trails, wildlife observation areas, etc.) for the public use and enjoyment of the site. Comment: Policy strengthens the City's commitment to public access to natural areas. See Support Document # 1 (Delray Oaks) for a complete discussion of this issue. 2. Location: Pg. III-D-21, Policy B-2.6 (NEW) Change: ADDITION Policy B-2.6 The City shall ensure that passive resource based facilities (i.e. trails~ wildlife observation areas~ etc.) will be provided for the public use and enjoyment of publicly owned natural areas. Comment: Policy strengthens the City's commitment to public access to natural areas. See Support Document # 1 (Delray Oaks) for a complete discussion of this issue. Page 11 HOUSING ELE~EN~ 1. Location: Pg. III-E-6, Figure H-1 Change: REVISION Comment: This figure, "Major Residential Parcels", has been replaced with a new figure, "Potential Residential Units", to provide up to date (1994) information. Page 12 Figure H-1 Ma)or Res~dentzal and Vacant OE RAY . 8EAC~ VACANT RESID 'TI32L ! ; ....... ~ COUNTY JURISOICTIC~ The Ci~y of De,my Beach MAJOR RESIDENTIAL PARCELS SPGsTRATEGIC PLANNING GROUP INC Page ~3 FIGURE H-1 I~ FIGURE H-1 RGURE L-4 POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS AGGREC~.TE PA~CD,.5 OF LAND. WHICH ARE VACANT OR UNOERDC~'LC~ED, 4,5 ACRES CR GREATER IN SIZE~ ,.~'D HAV[ A FJ..U.U. DL'~JG2.LA"~CN 0+"' LO~I DED,iSiTY. Pase ].4 2. Location: Pg. III-E-7, Table H-1 Table H-1 Ongoing Developments Single- Multi-Family Project Family Family Total 1. Sable Lakes 348 114 462 2. Sherwood Forest 125 --- 125 3. Isles of Delray 100 48 148 4. Groves of Delray --- 156 156 5. Auburn Trace --- 256 256 6. Waterford Village --- 236 236 7. Housing Partnership 36 --- 33 Total Number of 609 810 1,416 Units Planned: Source: Strategic Planning Group, Inc., 1988 _ Change: DELETION Comment: The table of on-going developments is incorporated in the table of "Potential Residential Units", thus it is not applicable as a separate table. -- Page 15 - 3. Location: Pg. III-E-7, Table H-2 Table H-2 Available Land Potential Parcel Size Density Units Type A 143 ac+ 4 units/acre 532 Single-family detached (SFD) B 101 ac+ 4 units/acre 404 SFD/MF C 60 ac+ 12 units/acre 720 Multifamily (MF) D 30 ac+ 6 units/acre 180 MF E 11 ac+ 12 units/acre 132 MF F 8 ac+ 6 units/acre 48 MF G 20 ac+ 10 units/acre 200 MF H 25 ac+ 5 units/acre 125 SFD/MF mixed Total Potential Housing Units: 2,241 Source: Strategic Planning Group, Inc., 1988 Change: REVISION SEE TABLE H-2 ON PAGE 17. Comment: The table of "Available Land" has been replaced with the table "Potential Residential Units" to reflect updated (1994) information. Page 16 -- TABLE H-2 ARD TABLE L-4 -- POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS FEBRUARY 1994 _ CURRENT POTENTIAL 101 LOW DENSITY R1AA 10.00 50.0 103 LOW DENSITY PRD 5.00 25.0 .... 110 LOW DENSITY CNTY 20.32 101.6 124 LOW DENSITY SAD 31.08 155.4 128 LOW DENSITY RIl 9.99 50.0 -- TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 76.39 ..... 382.0 104 MEDIUM DENSITY CNTY 4.94 59.3 -- 105 MEDIUM DENSITY CNTY 6.47 77.6 107 MEDIUM DENSITY CNTY 14.23 170.8 116 MEDIUM DENSITY RM 20.18 242.2 -- 117 MEDIUM DENSITY RR 14.79 177.5 118 MEDIUM DENSITY CF 36.80 441.6 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 97.41 ..... 1,169.0 125 MIXED USE SAD 10.54 126.5 142 MIXED USE CNTY 94.82 680.0 -- TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 105.36 ..... 806.5 102 RURAL RESIDENTIAL CNTY 107.01 535.1 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 107.01 ..... 535.1 _ 106 TRANSITIONAL CNTY 8.38 100.6 111 TRANSITIONAL CNTY 8.32 99.8 113 TRANSITIONAL CNTY 17.56 210.7 -- 114 TRANSITIONAL A 6.21 74.5 123 TRANSITIONAL POC 7.15 85.8 127 TRANSITIONAL RM 6.12 73.4 -- 139 TRANSITIONAL POC 18.83 262.0 143 TRANSITIONAL A 33.97 407.6 146 TRARS ITIONAL CNTY 52.18 626.2 147 TRANSITIONAL POC 10.00 120.0 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 168.72 ..... 2,060.6 122 PREVIOUS APPROVAL RM-8 18.56 140.0 150 PREVIOUS APPROVAL PRD 0.00 138.0 151 PREVIOUS APPROVAL PRD 0.00 114.0 -- 152 PREVIOUS APPROVAL SAD 0.00 292.0 153 PREVIOUS APPROVAL RM 0.00 158.0 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 18.56 ..... 842.0 GRAND TOTAL ............................ 573 · 45 ..... 5,795.2 SOURCE: CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, 1994. Page 17 4. Location: Pg. III-E-18, Policy A-1.4 Policy A-1.4: That these neighborhoods be identified as "stable residential" on the Housing Map, that the most restrictive residential zoning district which is applicable is affixed on the zoning map, and that requests for rezoning to a different zone designation, other than Community Facilities be denied. Change: REVISION Policy A-1.4: That these neighborhoods be identified as "stable residential" on the Housing Map, that the most restrictive residential zoning district which is applicable is affixed on the zoning map, and that requests for rezoning to a different zone designation, other than Community Facilities and Open Space be denied. Comment: The addition of Open Space as an allowable zoning category completes and furthers the policy direction of protecting stable residential neighborhoods. 5. Location: Pg. III-E-19, Policy A-2.4. Policy A-2.4: That these neighborhoods be identified as "stable residential" on the Housing Map, that the most restrictive residential zoning district which is applicable is affixed on the zoning map, and that requests for rezoning to a different zone designation, other than Community Facilities be denied. Change: REVISION Policy A-2.4: That these neighborhoods be identified as "stable residential" on the Housing Map, that the most restrictive residential zoning district which is applicable is affixed on the zoning map, and that requests for rezoning to a different zone designation, other than Community Facilities and Open Space be denied. Comment: The addition of Open Space as an allowable zoning category completes and furthers the policy direction of protecting stable residential neighborhoods. Page 18 COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-F-9, second bullet under Hurricane Evacuation · Within this area there is a population of approximately 5,422 (1980 Census Tracts 64, 7401, 7402). Change: REVISION · Within this area there is a population of approximately 7353 ~ZZ (1990 ~9~ Census Tracts 64, 7401, 7402t 54.03). Comment: The data is updated to reflect the 1990 Census. 2. Location: Pg. III-F-19, Policy A-2.3 Policy A-2.3: The City shall request of the City of Boynton Beach, the Town of Gulfstream, the Town of Highland Beach, and Boca Raton that notice be given of any development which shall impact the Intracoastal Waterway by diversion of runoff, the increase in direct runoff, or the introduction of a water-dependent use or commercial or industrial use along the Intracoastal Waterway. If it is not apparent that there will be no adverse impacts upon the Intracoastal Waterway, the item shall be referred to the Palm Beach Countywide Planning Council for an analysis and recommendation pursuant to provisions of its Charter. (c13) Change: REVISION Policy A-2.3: The City shall request of the City of Boynton Beach, the Town of Gulfstream, the Town of Highland Beach, and Boca Raton that notice be given of any development which shall impact the Intracoastal Waterway by diversion of runoff, the increase in direct runoff, or the introduction of a water-dependent use or commercial or industrial use along the Intracoastal Waterway. If it is not apparent that there will be no adverse impacts upon the Intracoastal Waterway, the item shall be referred to the Treasure Coast Reqional Planninq Council for review and mediation as needed until such time as the Palm Beach County Interlocal Plan Amendment Review Committee expands its review authority to this kind of Development Order Page 19 request. ~Zm ~6~ ~6~~ ~Z~~ ¢~Z Comment: The Planning Council has been disbanded. The Review Committee has been formed to provide that role of intergovernmental coordination, review and mediation formerly provided by the Planning Council. 3. Location: Pg. III-F-20, Policy A-4.1 Policy A-4.1: The need for additional water dependent uses in the area shall be addressed to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Commission. If needs in addition to those identified in the City's Plan are identified, a siting program should be requested of the Commission. (c13) Change: REVISION Policy A-4.1: The need for additional water dependent uses in the area shall be addressed to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council ~mi~~M. If needs in addition to those identified in the City's Plan are identified, a siting program should be requested of the Council ¢6~%~6~. (c13) Comment: Typographical error. Note that the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, together with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, is in the process of developing a boat facility siting plan for Palm Beach County. This siting plan is a component of the Manatee Protection Plan, which is required before the State will issue permits for additional marina development. 4. Location: Pg. III-F-20, Policy A-4.3 Policy A-4.3: The City shall participate with its adjacent units of government along the Intracoastal Waterway in responding to efforts of the others to implement programs as contained with its Plan for the protection of living marine resources, the reduction of exposure to natural hazards, and the continuing provision of public access to the Ocean and Intracoastal Waterway. Such participation shall occur through the existing mechanisms of the South County Council of Governments, the Palm Beach County Beaches and Shores Council. Change: REVISION Page 20 _ Policy A-4.3: The City shall participate with its adjacent units of government along the Intracoastal Waterway in responding to efforts of the others to implement programs as contained with its Plan for the protection of living marine resources, the reduction of exposure to natural hazards, and the continuing provision of public access to the Ocean and Intracoastal Waterway. Such participation shall occur through the existing mechanisms of the South County Council of Governments. ~ Z~ ~Z~ ~ ~Z~ B~M~ Comment: The Beaches and Shores Council's jurisdiction is limited to the area seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line. The Council has no role in the Intracoastal Waterway. 5. Location: Pg. III-F-21, Policy B-1.4 Policy B-1.4: Whenever development is proposed east of Highway A-1-A a survey of the property shall be required. Said survey shall identify any public access to lands seaward of the mean high tide or water line by prescription, prescriptive easement, or any other legal means or a surveyor's note that no such access exists. Any such access shall be eliminated or replaced only in compliance with F.S. 161.55(6). (c9) [LDR Section 4.5.5(c)] Change: REVISION Policy B-1.4: Whenever development is proposed east of Highway A-1-A a survey of the property shall be required. Said survey shall identify any public access to lands seaward of the mean high tide or water line by prescription, prescriptive easement, or any other legal means or a surveyor's note that no such access exists. No such access shall be eliminated or replaced except in compliance with F.S. 161.55(6).~M~ ~M Section 4.5.5(c)] Comment: Sentence structure is revised for clarity. 6. Location: Pg. III-F-28, Policy D-I.1 Policy D-i.i: Appendix I, Hurricane Evacuation; to Annex V, Evacuation, (III-L) of Palm Beach County's Peacetime Emergency Plan and its Page 21 attendant recommendations for hazard mitigation and interagency hazard mitigation reports is hereby adopted by the City of Delray Beach and the Fire Marshall is directed to provide for the effective implementation and coordination required by those recommendations. (c3) Change: REVISION Policy D-I.i: Appendix I, Hurricane Evacuation; to Annex V, Evacuation, (III-L) of Palm Beach County's Peacetime Emergency Plan and its attendant recommendations for hazard mitigation and interagency hazard mitigation reports is hereby adopted by the City of Delray Beach and the Coordinator of Emergency Services M~1Z is directed to provide for the effective implementation and coordination required by those recommendations. (c3) Comment: The City has formalized the duties and responsibilities of individuals charged with emergency management through the adoption of Ordinance 7-92. See Support Document # 4 (Emergency Management) for a complete text of the ordinance. 7. Location: Pg. III-F-29, Policy D-1.2 Policy D-1.2: The Fire Chief shall annually review the City's Hurricane Operations Plan (Annex II of the City's Emergency Operations Plan) to insure that base data is current and to insure that it is consistent with the Palm Beach County Peacetime Emergency Plan. (c4) Change: REVISION Policy D-1.2: The Fire Chief shall annually review the City's Emergency Operations Guide Zm~~ ~m~6~ ~X~; tO insure that base data is current and to insure that it is consistent with the Palm Beach County Peacetime Emergency Plan. (c4) Comment: The City's procedures manual for all types of emergencies have been gathered into a single emergency management guide and renamed appropriately. 8. Location: Pg. III-F-30, Policy D-4.1 Policy D-4.1: That consistent with Goal Area "E" of the Public Facilities Element, and more ~age 22 - specifically with Objective E-l, the following drainage improvements shall have high priority: · the one block area south of Atlantic Avenue adjacent to the Atlantic Avenue Bridge. · the Marina Historic District, and · Atlantic Avenue at Gleason, Venetian, and Seabreeze Avenues. Change: REVISION Policy D-4.1: That consistent with Goal Area "E" of the Public Facilities Element, and more specifically with Objective E-l, the following drainage improvements shall have high priority: · the one block area south of Atlantic Avenue adjacent to the Atlantic Avenue Bridge. · Atlantic Avenue at Gleason, Venetian, and Seabreeze Avenues. Comment: The drainage improvements project in the Marina Historic District has been completed. ~age ~3 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-G-2, Inventory Upon adoption of this Comprehensive Plan, the City's "reserve annexation area" will become replaced by the boundaries of it's official "Planninq Area". This area is shown on the maps contained in this Element and is generally described by the following boundaries: the Atlantic Ocean on the east; the Town of Highland Beach and the City of Boca Raton on the south; · the Town of Gulfstream and the City of Boynton Beach on the north; · the E-3 Canal (one-quarter mile west of Military Trail) on the west with exceptions of territory which is developed and served by County Utility System #3. Change: REVISION Upon adoption of this Comprehensive Plan, the City's "reserve annexation area" will become replaced by the boundaries of it's official "Planning Area". This area is shown on the maps contained in this Element and is generally described by the following boundaries: · the Atlantic Ocean on the east; · the Town of Highland Beach and the City of Boca Raton~ and unincorporated Palm Beach Countyt alonq the L-38 and C-15 canals~ on the south; · the Town of Gulfstream and the City of Boynton Beach on the north; · the E-3 Canal (one-half mile west of Military Trail) on the west with exceptions of territory which is developed and served by County Utility System #3. Comment: The description of the Planning Area is corrected for internal consistency (see also page II-2, "The Planning Area") Page 24 2. Location: Pg. III-G-5, Table L-1 Table L-1 Existing Land Use Inventoryx Category Acres % of Total Residential 4,010 40.3 Commercial 723 17.3 Industrial 251 2.5 Agricultural 391 3.8 Transportation 1,401 14.1 Recreation/Conservation 1,752 17.6 Educational/Public Buildings/ Grounds/Other Public Facilities 265 2.7 Vacant 1,163 11.7 Total 9,959 acres 100.0 15.56 square miles2 x Includes City, unincorporated pockets and reserve planning area 2 This net area excludes acreage devoted to the Intracoastal Waterway, 1-95, Lake Ida, and makes allowances for excessive right-of-way of major arterial roadways Source: City of Delray Beach, 1986 Change: REVISION Page 25 - Table L-1 Existing Land Use Inventory~ Category Acres % of Total Residential 4,206 42.2 Commercial 786 7.9 Industrial 257 2.6 Agricultural 391 3.9 Transportation 1,401 14.1 Recreation/Conservation 1,752 17.6 Educational/Public Buildings/ Grounds/Other Public Facilities 286 2.9 Vacant 878 8.8 Total 9,959 acres 100.0 15.56 square miles2 x Includes City, unincorporated pockets and reserve planning area 2 This net area excludes acreage devoted to the Intracoastal Waterway, 1-95, Lake Ida, and makes allowances for excessive right-of-way of major arterial roadways Source: City of Delray Beach, 1994 Comment: The table has been updated to reflect the 1994 land use inventory. 3. Location: Pg. III-G-9, Figure L-4 Comment: This figure, "Major Residential Parcels", has been replaced with a new figure, "Potential Residential Units", to provide up to date (1994) information. Page 26 · 8£AC1' The City of Delray Beach MAJOR RESIDENTIAL PARCELS SPG~STRATEGIC PLANNING GROUP INC FIGURE k-4 'Page 27 PO~~L RESIDE~ UN~S Page 28 4. Location: Pg. III-G-10, Table L-3 Table L-3 Ongoing Developments Single- Multi-Family Project Family Family Total 1. Sable Lakes 348 114 462 2. Sherwood Forest 33 --- 33 3. Isles of Delray 100 48 148 4. Groves of Delray --- 156 156 iTotal Number of 481 318 799 Units Planned: Source: City of Delray Beach, 1992 -- Change: DELETION -- Comment: The table of on-going developments is incorporated in the table of "Potential Residential Units", thus it is not applicable as a separate table. 5. Location: Pg. III-G-10, Table L-4 -- Table L-4 Available Land Potential Parcel Size Density Units Type A 143 ac+ 4 units/acre 532 Single-family detached (SFD) -- B 101 ac+ 4 units/acre 404 SFD C 60 ac+ 12 units/acre 720 Multifamily (MF) D 30 ac+ 6 units/acre 180 MF E 11 ac+ 12 units/acre 132 MF F 8 ac+ 6 units/acre 48 MF G 71 ac+ 10 units/acre 710 MF H 18 ac+ 5 units/acre 90 SFD/MF mixed -- Total Potential Housing Units: 2,816 Source: City of Delray Beach, 1992 Page 29 - Change: REVISION SEE TABLE L-4 ON PAGE 31 Comment: The table of "Available Land" has been replaced with the table "Potential Residential Units" to reflect updated (1994) information. Page 30 -- TABLE H-2 AND TABLE L-4 -- POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS FEBRUARY 1994 --- CURRENT POTENTIAL I ID# I DESIGNATION J ZONING I ACRES I []NITS 101 LOW DENSITY RIAA 10.00 50.0 -- 103 LOW DENSITY PR/) 5 . 00 25.0 110 LOW DENSITY C ITl"f 20.32 101.6 124 LOW DENSITY SAD 31.08 155.4 128 LOW DENSITY R1A 9 . 99 50.0 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 76.39 ..... 382.0 104 MEDIUM DENSITY CNTY 4.94 59.3 105 MEDIUM DENSITY CNTY 6 . 47 77.6 107 MEDIUM DENSITY CNTY 14 . 23 170 . 8 _ 116 MEDIUN DENSITY RM 20.18 242.2 117 MEDIUM DENSITY RR 14.79 177.5 118 MEDIUM DENSITY CF 36.80 441.6 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 97.41 ..... 1,169.0 125 NIXED USE SAD 10.54 126.5 -- 142 NIXED USE CI~ 94.82 680.0 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION 105 36 806 5 102 RURAL RESIDENTIAL CNTY 107 . 01 535.1 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION 107 01 535 1 -- 106 TRANSITIONAL CNTY 8.38 100.6 111 TRANSITIONAL CNTY 8.32 99.8 -- 113 TRANSITIONAL CNTY 17.56 210.7 114 TRANSITIONAL A 6 · 21 74.5 123 TRANSITIONAL POC 7.15 85.8 127 TRANSITIONAL RM 6 · 12 73.4 139 TRANSITIONAL POC 18 . 83 262.0 143 TRANSITIONAL A 33.97 407.6 146 TRANSITIONAL CNTY 52.18 626.2 -- 147 TRANSITIONAL POC 10.00 120.0 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 168.72 ..... 2,060.6 -- 122 PREVIOUS APPROVAL RM-8 18.56 140.0 150 PREVIOUS APPROVAL PRD 0.00 138.0 151 PREVIOUS APPROVAL PRD 0.00 114.0 152 PREVIOUS APPROVAL SAD 0.00 292.0 153 PREVIOUS APPROVAL RM 0 . 00 158 . 0 TOTAL FOR DESIGNATION .................. 18.56 ..... 842.0 SOURCE: CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, 1994. Pa§e 31 6. Location: Pg. III-G-33, Policy C-4.3 Policy C-4.3 A special CBD development plan shall be developed jointly by the CRA and the City. It shall be initiated subsequent to completion of the Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Plan (see Policy C-2.4). It shall address the maximum development which can be accommodated in a competitive market while still retaining the "village like, community by-the-sea" character of the CBD. It shall further identify the infrastructure requirements, including parking, which will be needed to accommodate such an intensity of development. Such a plan shall be formally processed as an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. The plan shall be instituted under the lead of the City's Planning Department but conducted through close participation with the Community Redevelopment Agency. Change: REVISION Policy C-4.3 A special CBD development plan shall be developed jointly by the CRA and the City. It shall be initiated subsequent to completion of the Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Plan (see Policy C-2.4). It shall address the maximum development which can be accommodated in a competitive market while still retaining the "village like, community by-the-sea" character of the CBD. It shall further identify the infrastructure requirements, including parking, which will be needed to accommodate such an intensity of development. Such a plan shall be formally processed as an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. The plan shall be instituted under the lead of the Community Redevelopment Agency ¢~;~ PI~~ ~~ but conducted through close participation with the City's Planning Department ~6~Z~ ~9~~ Comment: The Community Redevelopment Agency has taken the lead role in this planning effort. Policy C-2.2 of the CRA Plan identifies the specific item. 7. Location: Pg. III-G-33, Policy C-4.6 Policy C-4.6 The City and the C.R.A. shall, in FY 91/92, develop a strategy for attracting private and public educational institutions to the Pineapple Grove Area e.g. art and culinary schools or a branch of PBCC. Change: DELETION Comment: Although the economic development of the -- Pineapple Grove Area is still an aim of the City and the CRA, this specific program is no longer active. Thus, the specific policy should be deleted. 8. Location: Pg. III-G-33, Policy C-4.9 Policy C-4.9 The following capital improvements have already been identified as essential components of efforts and programs which are necessary to keep the CBD a vital and competitive commercial marketplace. These are considered as short term (first planning period FY 90/91 to FY 95/96) capital improvements which should be a part of any general obligation bond program which is created. · Phase II of the Old School Square Project · Parking area west of Swinton or suitable substitutes for the O.S.S. Project · Veteran's Park improvement, without a riverwalk per Recreational Element · Phase III of Atlantic Avenue Beautification i.e. expansion of the beautification program east of the bridge to the Ocean · Alleyway enhancement program · Reconstruction of N.E. 7th Avenue Change: REVISION Policy C-4.9 The following capital improvements have already been identified as essential components of efforts and programs which are necessary to keep the CBD a vital and competitive commercial marketplace. These are considered as short term (first planning period FY 90/91 to FY 95/96) capital improvements which should be a part of any general obligation bond program which is created. Page 33 __ Phase III of Atlantic Avenue Beautification i.e. expansion of the beautification program east of the bridge to the Ocean · Reconstruction of N.E. 7th Avenue Comment: Old School Square Phase II, Veterans Park Improvements, and the Alleyway Improvement Program have been completed. The parking area on N.W. 1st Avenue has been completed to provide parking for the Old School Square project. 9. Location: Pg. III-G-40, Commercial Core description. Commercial Core: This designation is applied to the Community's Downtown Areas. It includes the "Village Center" development scenario described in the Future Land Use Element and graphically shown in Figure L-8. The Commercial Core designation accommodates a variety of uses including commercial and office development; residential land use upper story apartments; older homes renovated to accommodate office use; and uses such as "bed and breakfast" establishment; and Industrial/Commerce uses as proposed in the "Village Center" development scenario. Change: REVISION Commercial Core: This designation is applied to the Community's downtown area. It can also be applied to a commercial component of a planned residential development~ when that component is internally oriented~ with no direct access to an arterial roadway. The Commercial Core designation ZE includes the "Village Center" development scenario described in the Future Land Use Element and graphically shown in Figure L-8. I__t TM~ ~t~~I ~ ~~M accommodates a variety of uses including commercial and office development; residential land use upper story apartments; older homes renovated to accommodate office use; ~M~ uses such as "bed and breakfast" establishment~; and Industrial/Commerce uses as proposed in the "Village Center" development scenario, and in the Blood's Grove commercial component. Comment: See Support Document #5 (Blood's Grove Land Use Amendment) for further information on this subject. Page 34 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-H-18, Policy A-i.1 Policy A-i.1 The needs for a new park in the Southwest portion of the City and an accompanying Fire Station shall be provided concurrent with, or prior to, the development of Blood's Hammock Grove. Change: REVISION Policy A-i.1 The need~ for a new park in the Southwest portion of the City ~ ~ ~~~ F~ ~~ shall be addressed ~~ concurrent with, or prior to, the development of Blood's Hammock Grove. Comment: Fire Station #5, located on Llnton Blvd. at Old Germantown Rd. was completed in 1993. Thus, that portion of Policy A-I.1 addressing the Fire Station is no longer applicable. 2. Location: Pg. III-H-24, Policy A-3.10 Policy A-3.10 In order to finance needed capital improvements as identified in this Element and which are most appropriately paid for from Enterprise Funds, the City shall utilize proceeds from the April 1, 1991, Water and Sewer Enterprise Revenue Bond. Change: DELETION Comment: All projects financed by the 1991 Water and Sewer Enterprise Revenue Bond have been completed. Thus, the policy is no longer applicable. Page 35 INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT 1. Location: Pg. III-I-19, Policy A-2.3 Policy A-2.3 Any conflicts emanating from Policy A-1.2 and which are not resolved prior to resubmission to D.C.A. shall be taken to the Palm Beach Countywide Planning County for mediation. (c2) Change: REVISION Policy A-2.3 Any conflicts emanating from Policy A-2.1 ~Z and which are not resolved prior to resubmission to D.C.A. shall be taken to the Palm Beach Countywide Coordination Program and/or the Treasure Coast Reqional Planninq Council as appropriate, ~Zm ~ ~~ ~~ ¢~M~ for direction and/or mediation. (c2) Comment: The referenced policy should be 2.1, not 1.2. If a conflict continues to exist, the first forum for seeking resolution would be through the Palm Beach Countywide Coordination Program to see if the conflict has a county-wide or multi-jurisdictional implication. If so, direction from that organization should be followed. If the item is local in nature, it would be appropriate to seek the mediation services which are provided through the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. Page 36 REQUIREMENTS FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IMPLEMENTATION 1. Location: Pg. IV-12, Five Year Capital Improvement Schedule Change: REVISION Comment: Table IV-3, the Five Year Capital Improvement Schedule for Projects > $100,000, has been revised to reflect the City's Five Year Capital Improvement Plan. Page 37 EXISTING 0 0000 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 ~ 0000 ~ 0 00000 O0 0 ~00 ~ ~ ~ - oc~ 0 Page 38 EXISTING 0 0 0 0 Page 39 EXISTING 0000000000 000~00~00 0 ~0~ ~0~ --" · ~ · · ~ O0 Page 40 EXI STING J , ~ 0 Page 41 EXISTING 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0000 0 0000 0 0 0000 ~ 0 0000 0 0 ~0~0 ~ g _ 0 O0 0 0 0 0 0000 ~ 0 O0 0 0 0 0 0000 ~ ~ O0 0 ~ ~ 0 0000 ~ O0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~0~0 ~ 0 O0 0 0 0 0000 ~ 0 O0 0 0 0 0000 ~ 0 O0 0 0 0 00 O0 ~ ~ O0 ~OI ~ 0 0000 0 ~ ~ O0 ~ ~ 0 0000 0 0 00000 0 0 0 0000000 O0 ~ 0 00000 0 0 ~ 0000~00 O0 ~ 0 Page 42 REVISED TABLE IV-3 FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT · $100,000 WA TE~R/SEWE~ - ~ ~AL OUTLA Y .... ~AT~R i~Nr, JNE F. XTENS .~. S . . ~m,~ 0 0 0 ~m,~ ~,~ ~R ~INE ~~ t ~E.N~ - ~ A~N~ ~K 1M.~ ~.~ 0 0 0 0 D~ER ~HINERY & EQUi~E~ 1~,~ ~RE STA~. ~.3.WATER & S~R ~,~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~R RD. ~ TO UNT~ ~ WA~R ~N 0 ~1~ 0 0 0 0 ~E ~ 8~T~ W~E~S. 0 1~,~. 0 0 0 0 & ~TAT~ 0 1~,~ 0 0 ~ ~,~. 0 VA~ TRUCK ~ o o ~,~ 0 0 0 B~N DRJYE ~ATER & S~ER) 0 0 . ~ 210.~ 0 0 0 SIL~R T.ER~CE ~AT~R & SEWER) 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~R RD. TO S.W. T~K-~ WATER ~IN 0 0 ... 0 415,~ 0 0 FED.~. ~. D TO ~15 ~) WATER&S~ER 0 .... 0 0 1~ 0 0 ~ '" i,,, ~,~ I ~,~ I ~,~ I ~,~ I ~,~ I ~,~ ~R ~ U~ 8TAT~ ~~A~-~Ea . . ~RE ~T RE~ME~ PE~. .~1 ~191 ~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~ ~A~R ~1~ NA~R METER RE~E~ P~ ~,~ ~ STAT~ ~R6~ TO SU~ERSI~E ~9~ 1~,~ 1~,~ 1~,~ 1~,~ 1~,~ , ~~ To sw~ o ~,~ o o o o B.W. 1~ STRE~. ~L~ PR~I~ - RESI~ ~ ~ ~,~ ~,~ ~,~ . ~,~ ~A~R ~N8 ~,~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~. A~ A~. WA~R ~N REL~ 1~,~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~, UN~ ,~RL~ WATEr. ER 0 1~,~ 0 ,0 0 ~T ~ RD. RE~STR~T~ WATEr,ER U~S 0 ~.~ 0 0 0 0 ~ RE~~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~~ RD. ~ TO CUR~ WA(~ 0 0 ~,~ 0 0 0 WATEreR 0 0 0, 1~,~ 0 0 ~.W. 1~ A~NUE ~.2~ 0 0 0 0 0 N.;E. ~ STRE~ ~INT~ TO N.E. 2ND ST.) ~,1~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~H~.L ~ITE 'S' ROAD I~p~OV~ME~TS ~.~ 1~,~ 0 0 0 0 SWINTON/~UTH RI~S W. 10TH STREET 116.~ 0 0~ 0 0 0 ~T ~AE 1~4 ~UTIFiCATION ( ~ ~ ~ 124.~ . 0 ~ 0 0 0 WEST ~KE IDA 8~UTIFI~TION TENNIS CENTER iMPROVEMENTS 1.703 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 LEON WEEKE$ SCRUB T~IL PARK {P~C=E~ONAL SERV~ES~ ~ 25 ~ ', 0 ~ ~: 0 0 0 AUT~TEDiRRE~T,ONSYSTE~ ~ l~ ~ o[ o~ 0 O~ 0 BEAUT. IFtCATION~ A~ORNEY PROPER~ . 0 ~ 0 51 ~ I 0 0 0 ~M;EY PA,RK ~L ~ ~2~ ~ 170~ , 3 ? 0 I O { O EQU;PMENT ~E~E;','AL & REP~CEMENT Page 43 REVISED TABLE IV-3 FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT [ PROJECT & FUND I'FY 1993-94 t FY 1994-95 I FY 1995-96 [ FY 1996-97 J FY 1997-98 GOLF (:~II~E CLUB HOUSE 2,~5,000 0 0 0 ' iRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS 0 0 100,(X]0 0 ~BRIOGE REI~I. CEMEHT 0 0 0 0 DECADE OF EXCELLENCE II FIRE ADMINISTRATION 778,15e 0 0 0 ~.W. DRNNAGE (PHASE It) ., I,/S,e00, 0 0 STREET RECONSTRUCTION (PHASE II) 2,00~,6~16 0 0 0 C.BD. ALLEYWAY RECONSTRUCTION 334..950 0 0 0 SPADY ELEMENTARY 68.000 S.W. 10TH STREET lt755.$11 0' BEAUTIFICATION - W. ATLANTIC -> 1-95 TO MILITARY 215,020 0 0 0 BEAUTIFICATION - SWlNTON AVENUE 432t9()0 0 0 0 IEAUTIFICATION - ATLANTIC E. TO OCEAN J02,000 ~:)0,IXI0 0 0 BEAUTIFICATION - BARWIC.K ROAD 51,3e0 0 0 0 ~REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ~, ~0 ~50 000 650000 t~3 W4~ REVENUE 'BO~D SW. $TOR.,N~E TANK LAND 7'7,8(}0 0 0 0i . GOLF COURSE WELLS (2,), MAINS 940~5~0 0 0 0i N.E. STORAGE TANKS (ATLANTIC H.$.) 1,55e,,1~0 0 0 I~ WATER MAIN - ~ ROAD 15t,,100 0 0 I} WATER MAIN - LAKE IDA ROAD 220,,2~ 0 0 I~ JNATER ~ - ANI3,REW~ .AVENUE 415,5~0 0 0 II INATER ~ - N.E. 3RD AVENUE 238~380 . 0 0 WATER MAIN * N. BARWICK ROAD ~,100 0 0 ~ATER ~ - RIDGEV~X)O ROAD 20~0 0 0 0 N. RESERVOIR HIOH SERVICE PUMP :~'150 0 0 I~ TRANSMISSION MAIN-16' TO N.E TANK 0 0 0 MORtKAMI PRODUCTION WELLS PlP',NG 0 i 4C~.O00 0 SCHOOL SITE'S' LIFT STATION;FORCE MA,N 0 t 2~..,00~. 0 DOVER ROAD- 20' WATER MAIN (50%~ 0 j 262500 SOUTHWEST STORAGE TANK ~RESER v'E'~ 0 ~ 330 0(X) TOTALS I $4~3.725 I $1.248.500 i $4~5..000 ; $450.00Ci ~ 5C~ } IN 1994. CCNSIDE. RAT:CN OF RE. VEN,,E SCN= ~ OFPO.SE= TC -,',',',,.~'_ FOTA~S ~0.000 [ S~m.SO0 I ...... Page 44 PROCEDURES FOR MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF THE PLAN 1. Location: Pg. V-i, Implementation of goals, objectives, and policies of the elements of the plan Immediate Needs: The following items have been identified as items which must be addressed as soon as possible. 1. Preparatory work for establishment of a Storm Water Facility Fee program CIE A-2.2 & PF C-1 2. General Obligation Bond Issue program CIE A-3.9 3. Process revisions re CIE, CIP, CIB -- CIE A-4 Fiscal Year 91/92 1. Creation of "scenic street" program T B-3.2 2. Lindell & Federal Highway Redevelopment Plan LU C-2.6 & H B-3.1 3. Enhanced street marking program T C-2.1 4. Review of street names & system T B-2.2 5. Congested intersection inventory & program T B-2.1 6. City/CRA strategy re public/private education facilities in Pineapple Grove LU C-4.6 7. City/CRA use of alleys program LU C-4.7 8. West Atlantic Redevelopment Plan LU C-2.4 & H B-3.1 9. Germantown Road Redevelopment Plan LU C-2.5 & H B-3.1 10. In-town shuttle, program development T A-1.3 & Beach shuttle transportation program OSR B-3.1 and CM B-i.1 11. Land Use Regulation for Wellfields C A-2.3 and PF B-4.2 12. Discharge in waterways ordinance C C-2.2 & C C-2.1 re program for termination of a/c discharge 13. Rezoning industrial land in Wellfield Protection Zone #3 of Series 20 Wellfield LU B-1.2 14. City/CRA Atlantic Avenue governmental complex strategy LU C-3.5 15. Post disaster redevelopment program preparation CM D-3 16. Resolve FIND property status/disposition CM C-4.1 & 4.2 17. Community Residential Home amendment to the LDR's H A-5.11 18. Wellfield protection expansion to 1' drawdown area C-2.2 19. Rezoning of weilfield protection zones #1 & #2 PF B-4.3 20. City/CRA marketing strategy LU C-3.5 21. Neighborhood Information Exchange Program H A-1 Page 45 22. Pineapple Grove neighborhood plan LU C-4.8 Fiscal Year 92/93 1. East of Woods of Southridge Redevelopment Plan H B-3.1 2. Mooring facilities study CM C-6.5 3. Study re ways to accommodate staffing increases. PFD-3.1 4. Creation of "scenic street" program T B-3.2 5. Silver Terrace Redevelopment Plan LU C-2.7 6. Report re mitigation of impacts of point source pollution PF A-1 7. Report re mitigation impacts of non-point source pollution PF A-2 8. Alternatives re canal recharge/storage PF B-2.1 9. Public information exhibits PF F-1 10. Pole & obstruction removal program T C-2.2 11. C.B.D. Development Plan LU C-4.3 12... Program for reuse of effluent discharqe and addressing termination of ocean discharqe PF A-1.2 13. Sewer Master Plan, revisions & update PF C-1 14. Enhanced Code Enforcement Program powers H A-5.3 15. "Rehabilitation Strategy" Program development H B-2.3 16. Lake Ida Shoreline Protection Program C B-3.2 17. Intracoastal Shoreline Protection Program C B-3o3 18. Seawall ordinance review and modification CM D-4.2 19. Funding program developed for the cemetery expansion. PF D-2.1. 20. Housing revolving loan fund program development H A-5.1 21. Rezoning of wellfield 20 area LU B-1.2 22. Intergovernmental agreement with the County re land use in annexation area LU B-3.3 23. Commence annexation program LU B-3.4 24. Report re collection and disposal of "wastes" PF A-3 25. Alternative re WWTP discharge for irrigation PF B-2.1 26. Water conservation (forced) program PF B-3.1 & program expansion C A-4.2 27. Snorkel Park Study CM C-6.4 28. Obtain rights to land for "reserve" wellfield LU B-1.3, PF B-2.4 29. Cross dune beach access study CM A-I.5 Fiscal Year 93/94 1. Evaluation and Appraisal Report 2. Assessment of user fees OSR A-3.2 Page 4 6 3. Linton/S.W. 4th Avenue Redevelopment Plan LU C-2.8a and H B-3.1 4. Redevelopment Plan, area south of the CBD H B-3.1 &LUC2.9 7. Assessment of environmental impact of concrete plants C A-3.4 Change: REVISION Fiscal Year 91/92 -- 1. Creation of "scenic street" program T B-3.2 2. Lindell & Federal Highway Redevelopment Plan LU _ C-2.6 & H B-3.1 3. Enhanced street marking program T C-2.1 4. Review of street names & system T B-2.2 5. Congested intersection inventory & program T -- B-2.1 6. West Atlantic Redevelopment Plan LU C-2.4 & H B-3.1 -- 7. Germantown Road Redevelopment Plan LU C-2.5 & H B-3.1 8. In-town shuttle, program development T A-1.3 & _ Beach shuttle transportation program OSR B-3.1 and CM B-1.1 9. Resolve FIND property status/disposition CM ~ 4.2 -- 10. Community Residential Home amendment to the LDR's LU A-5.11 11. Neighborhood Information Exchange Program H A-1 Page 4'/ - Fiscal Year 92/93 1. East of Woods of Southridge Redevelopment Plan H B-3.1 2. Study re ways to accommodate staffing increases. PFD-3.1 3. Silver Terrace Redevelopment Plan LU C-2.7 4. Report re mitigation of impacts of point source pollution PF A-1 5. Report re mitigation impacts of non-point source pollution PF A-2 6. Public information exhibits PF F-1 7. Pole & obstruction removal program T C-2.2 8. C.B.D. Development Plan LU C-4.3 9. Sewer Master Plan, revisions & update PF C-1 10. Enhanced Code Enforcement Program powers H A-5.3 11. "Rehabilitation Strategy" Program development H B-2.3 12. Seawall ordinance review and modification CM D-4.2 13. Housing revolving loan fund program development H A-5.1 14. Report re collection and disposal of "wastes" PF A-3 15. Snorkel Park Study CM C-6.4 16. Discharge in waterways ordinance C C-2.2 & C C-2.1 re program for termination of a/c discharge 17. Post disaster redevelopment program preparation CM D-3 18. Pineapple Grove neighborhood plan LU C-4.8 19. Complete Tennis Center LU C-3.6 20. Drainage Master Plan PF E-i.1 21. Amend CBD zone district to accommodate 30 DU/Ac LU A-§.13 22. Amend CBD zone district to accommodate industrial and commerce uses LU A-5.14 B/2/Z Page 48 Fiscal Year 93/94 .1. Assessment of user fees OSR A-3.2 2. Linton/S.W. 4th Avenue Redevelopment Plan LU C-2.8a and H B-3.1 3. Redevelopment Plan, area south of the CBD H B-3.1 &LUC2.9 4. Assessment of environmental impact of concrete plants C A-3.4 5. Intracoastal Shoreline Protection Program C B-3.3 6. Commence annexation program LU B-3.4 7. Feasibility study for wastewater effluent reuse by groundwater recharge PF B-2.1 & C A-4.7b Fiscal Year 94/95 1. Leon Weekes Interpretive Trail C B-1.3 Fiscal Year 95/96 1. Evaluation and Appraisal Report _ Comment: The projects list is revised to account for projects and programs that have been completed, eliminated or rescheduled in previous amendments of in the current -- amendment. Page 49 -- AMENDMENTS TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP 1. An amendment on 94.815 acres from Medium Density Residential/5 units per acre (County) to 41 acres of Medium Density Residential, 5-12 units per acre; 40 acres Low Density Residential, 0-5 units per acre; 10 acres Commercial Core; and 4 acres Open Space (City). Comment: See Support Document #5 (Blood's Grove Land Use Amendment) for further information on this subject. T: \Advanced\94-1 ~age 50 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1 SUPPORT DOCUMENT # 1 DELRAY OAKS Purpose: This report updates the status of the Delray Oaks site, an environmentally sensitive parcel of land. Delray Oaks is cited in a number of policies in the Comprehensive Plan as requiring preservation. Events occurring since the adoption of the Plan increase the likelihood of preservation through public acquisition. These events also identify the need to readdress the City's direction toward the site as stated in the Plan. BACKGROUND: Comprehensive Plan Direction: Delray Oaks is mentioned in the following portions of the Comprehensive Plan: · Vegetative Communities identified on the "Inventory of Native Ecosystems in Palm Beach County, Phase III Report" include: (see Figure C-l) Leon Weekes Environmental Preserve, 12 acres, Florida Scrub; Hurricane Pines, 5 acres, Florida Scrub; Atlantic Dunes Park, 4 acres, Beach Strand Community; Delray Oaks, 24 acres, Low (Oak) Hammock Areas identified in the background materials as the Linton Corridor (15 acres of Pine Flatwood and Pines) and the Lowson Scrub (3 acres of Florida Scrub) are not observable in the field and, therefore, deemed non- existent. · Vegetative Communities The Hurricane Pines (five acres of Florida Scrub) site and the Delray Oaks (24 acres, Low Oak Hammock) are in private ownership and are subject to development. Portions of these sites can be preserved through acquisition, (including the County Environmentally Sensitive Lands Acquisition Program), extraction (public site dedication provisions of the subdivision regulations), or through sensitive development under "planned development" concepts. · Development of a program or methods, including the County Environmentally Sensitive Lands Acquisition Program, for the preservation of all or a part of the following sites: · Hurricane Pines, 5 acres, Florida Scrub; · Delray Oaks, 24 acres, Low Oak Hammock · The FIND parcels Objective B-l: The City shall undertake efforts, through the following policies, to protect the following natural reservations and environmentally sensitive areas: (b3,b4)(c9) · Leon Weekes Environmental Preserve; · Delray Oaks hammock area in the Alfieri Pugliese Park of Commerce; · Hurricane Pines scrub community along S.W. 10th Street west of U.S. #1 (S.E. 5th Avenue); · the following Florida Inland Navigational District _~ holdings: · parcel off McCleary Street · parcel southeast of the 8th Street Bridge .... · parcel by Knowles Park; Policy B-1.2 The Delray Oaks area of the Alfieri Pugliese -- Park of Commerce and Hurricane Pines along S.W. 10th Street should be preserved in part through sensitive site planning. Policy B-2.1 The Land Use Map shall identify as "conservation" the following areas which shall be preserved: · the three F.I.N.D. parcels along the Intracoastal; · the Leon Weekes Environmental Preserve scrub habitat; -- · Delray Oaks; · Hurricane Pines on S.W. 10th Street, west of Federal Highway; and _ · The City's Conservation area on Palm Trail. (c2) Overview of Preservation Efforts: Palm Beach County created the Environmentally Sensitive Lands Acquisition Advisory Committee in 1989. This Committee ranked environmentally sensitive lands, using objective criteria, -- according to their desirability for acquisition. In 1990, the County adopted the environmentally Sensitive Lands _ Ordinance to protect environmentally sensitive lands. A bond referendum in 1991 pledged ad valorem tax revenues for the acquisition, preservation and protection of environmentally -- sensitive lands in Palm Beach County. The County also adopted, in 1991, the Environmentally Sensitive Lands Acquisition Selection Ordinance to authorize negotiations to purchase such -- lands. Page 2 The Florida Communities Trust, through the Preservation 2000 Program, provides matching grant funds for the preservation and rehabilitation of ecologically valuable sites. The Environmentally Sensitive Lands Acquisition Advisory Committee identified Delray Oaks (Ecosite 67) as one of fourteen sites to be given high priority for acquisition by the County. In 1993, the City and County submitted a partnership application for funding from Florida Communities Trust (FCT) for acquisition of Delray Oaks. Local matching funds for the purchase were to come from the County's $100 million bond referendum for acquisition of environmentally sensitive lands. Unfortunately, the application did not score high enough to receive funding by FCT in 1993. Reasons for the relatively low ranking by FCT included weaker than desired direction in the City's Comprehensive Plan (i.e. lack of a strong commitment to public acquisition and provision of public access), and lack of specific policies regarding protection of habitat for listed species and preservation of groundwater recharge areas. The County is currently negotiating with the owner of Delray Oaks to acquire the site with funds to come from the bond referendum. The County expects to have acquired title to the land early in 1994. Once changes are made to strengthen the City's Comprehensive Plan language regarding the site, the City and County will submit a partnership application to FCT for funding, using the land as the local match to the grant funds. ANALYSIS: Preservation of the Delray Oaks through public acquisition is proceeding through the County's Environmentally Sensitive Lands Acquisition Program. Funds are available from FCT to augment local funds; the ranking of applications for these funds is based, in part, on the policies contained in the City's Comprehensive Plan. In light of the on-going partnership efforts of the City and County to acquire the site, it is appropriate to strengthen the policies relating to the preservation of the site. RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: In light of the on-going partnership efforts by the City and County to acquire and preserve the Delray Oaks site, it is appropriate to strengthen Policy B-1.2 of the Conservation Element by directing the City toward public acquisition of the site. The redirected Policy will be: Policy B-1.2 The Delray Oaks area of the Alfieri Pugliese Park of Commerce shall be preserved throuqh sensitive development under "planned development" concepts, exaction (public sites dedication provisions of the Land Development Regulations), 9r throuqh acquisition (includinq the County Environmentally Sensitive Lands Acquisition Program). The City shall participate with the County in seekinq State Page 3 fundinq for the acquisition of the Delray Oaks site and its development as a preservation area. ~ Hurricane Pines along S.W. 10th Street should be preserved in part through sensitive site planning. In order to strengthen the Comprehensive Plan direction in the eyes of the Florida Communities Trust as they review a future application for funding to purchase and maintain the Delray Oaks site, the following new policies are recommended: CONSERVATION ELEMENT Policy A-1.4 The City shall encourage the preservation of existing groundwater recharge areas through sensitive site planning. In the case of environmentally sensitive lands, such preservation may include acquisition (including the County Environmentally Sensitive Lands Acquisition Program), extraction (public sites dedication provisions of the land Development Regulations), or sensitive development under "planned development" concepts. P0~icy B-2.6 The City shall, to the maximum extent feasible, preserve, conserve, appropriately use and protect fisheries, wildlife and marine habitats which serve as habitat for endangered and threatened plant and animal species. OPEN SPACE & RECREATION ELEMENT Policy B-2.5 The City shall ensure public access to publicly owned natural areas that provide passive resource based facilities (i.e. trails, wildlife observation areas, etc.) for the public use and enjoyment of the site. Policy B-2.6 The City shall ensure that passive resource based facilities (i.e. trails, wildlife observation areas, etc.) will be provided for the public use and enjoyment of publicly owned natural areas. T: \advanced\OAKS 1 Page 4 - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1 SUPPORT DOCUMENT # 2 WATER RATES Purpose: This report describes the City's efforts to adopt a new water rate structure to further water conservation. BACKGROUND: Comprehensive Plan Direction: The Comprehensive Plan directs responsible water consumption and a reduction in per capita consumption through a number of techniques, including manipulation of water rates. This direction is found in Public Facilities Element Policy B-3.1. Policy B-3.1 The City shall maintain its program of responsible consumption of water (per capita basis) and shall decrease the overall per capita consumption of water by 10% from 1989 levels through continued implementation of the following techniques and programs: (Also see Objective A-4 of the Conservation Element). · maintaining its water rate structure which sets a higher uniform rate for consumption and decreases customer capacity charges in order to promote reductions in water consumption as well as establishment of conservation surcharges, based on South Florida Water Management District formulae, and keyed to various levels of drought alert; · mandatory use of wells for irrigation purposes where conditions permit; [LDR Section 7.7] · enhanced enforcement of water use laws; · requirements for xeriscape landscaping alternatives to be considered for all new development during the review of site and development plans [LDR Section 4.6.16(E)]; and · continuation of the regular preventive maintenance program for water mains, pumps and meters (see related Policy C-4.3) The Plan also directs the establishment of a standard for water use based on land use type, with penalty payments for exceeding the standards. This direction is found in Policy A-4.2 of the Conservation Element: Policy A-4.2 Develop a standard of water use for various land uses (e.g. varying with lot sizes, bedrooms, common areas, etc.) which equates to 110% of a reduction target and establish it as the limit of "reasonable" consumption. Then provide for a penalty payment (higher rate) for water consumption above the reasonable amount. This program shall be instituted in FY 92/93, if the rate of water consumption is not reduced through voluntary means. (cl) Water Supply Permit Direction: The City is in the process of obtaining permits, from South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), for a new well field at Morikami Park. One condition of receiving this permit is: The adoption of water conservation-based rate structures. Such rate structures should include at least one of the following alternative components: increasing block rates, seasonal rates, quantity based surcharges and/or time of day pricing as a means of reducing demands. The City investigated the feasibility of each of these components. It was determined that time of day pricing was impractical from a reporting stand point. Seasonal pricing was also discarded as an option since there is little seasonal fluctuation in water use. The methods selected by the City to implement water conservation-based rate structures were increasing block rates and a conservation surcharge. Block rates refer to differential pricing for various amounts of water consumption. For example, the commodity rate charged to a customer using 4,000 to 10,000 gallons per month is $1.10/1000 gallons ($1.25 outside the City); while the commodity rate for a customer using 36,000 to 50,000 gallons per month is $1.30/1000 gallons ($1.63 outside the City). Increasing block rates create an inverted rate structure which will promote water conservation. Conservation surcharges refer to a special surcharge applied during periods of mandatory water restrictions. In drought conditions, SFWMD may declare water restrictions. During such periods, an automatic surcharge will be added to the commodity charge according to a schedule related to the the phase of restriction. For example, a Phase I restriction declared by SFWMD demands a reduction in monthly water consumption of 15%; a surcharge of 5% will be added to the charges for water used above that reduction. Action Taken: On November 23, 1993, the City Commission adopted Ordinance #55-93, which amends Chapter 52 , "Water", of the City's Code of Ordinances. The change adopted an inverted block rate structure and established a conservation surcharge. Page 2 - RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The following REVISION may be made to Public Facilities Policy B-3.1: Policy B-3.1 The City shall maintain its program of responsible consumption of water (per capita basis) and shall decrease the overall per capita consumption of water by 10% from 1989 levels through continued implementation of the following techniques and programs: (Also see Objective A-4 of the Conservation Element). · maintaining its water rate structure which establishes an inverted block rate structure to set higher consumption rates for increased water to promote reductions in water consumption as well as establishment of conservation surcharges, based on South Florida Water Management District formulae, and keyed to various levels of drought alert; · mandatory use of wells for irrigation purposes where conditions permit; [LDR Section 7.7] · enhanced enforcement of water use laws; · requirements for xeriscape landscaping alternatives to be considered for all new development during the review of site and development plans [LDR Section 4.6.16(E)]; and · continuation of the regular preventive maintenance program for water mains, pumps and meters (see related Policy C-4.3) Conservation Element Policy A-4.2 may be deleted since the inverted block rate structure adopted by the City accomplishes the aim of establishing a disincentive for over consumption of water through a more efficient means. Where the policy keyed the water use standard to land uses, the inverted block rate structure establishes as the standard the lowest water usage City wide, regardless of home size or type. Application of this standard is more efficient and fair since it does not require an extreme number of standards. T: \Advanced\Rate i Page 3 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGE~/~~ SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM ~ /'OR - MEETING OF NOVEMBER 23. 1993 QRDINANCE NO. DATE: November 19, 1993 This is the second reading of an ordinance amending Chapter 52, "Water", of'the Code of Ordinances to provide for miscellaneous text revisions, increasing water deposits for tenants, changing the water rate structure to an inverted block schedule, establishing a Conservation Surcharge and adding fees for various services. At the November 2nd workshop meeting, the Commission gave direction with regard to modifying the Conservation Surcharge. Following that direction, Ordinance No. 55-93 was modified to reduce the surcharge and to make it applicable to every one. It is important that we proceed with the adoption of the inverted block rate structure and a Conservation surcharge in order to get permits for the Morikami Wellfield. At the November 9th regular meeting, Ordinance No. 55-93 passed on first reading by a 5 to 0 vote. Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 55-93 on second and final reading. ORDINANCE NO. 55-93 AR ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY 8EACH, FLORIDA, AHENDING CHAPTER 52, "WATER", OF TH~ CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, BY AHENDING SECTION 52.02, "DISCONTINUING SERVICE AT REQUEST OF CUSTOH~R", TO CLARIFY THE TERM "TEMPORARY"; BY SECTION 52.15, "MINIMUM SIZE OF HETERS", TO SEPARATELY DEFINE HETER SIZES USED AT PLACES OF BUSINESS ARD TO REDESIGNATE THIS SECTION; BY AMENDING SECTION S2.31, · '~CONNECTION CHARGES", SUBSECTION (A), TO CLARIFY WHEN A WATER CONNECTION IS CHARGED; BY AMENDING SECTION.S2.33, "DEPOSIT TO GU~E PAYMENT", TO PROVIDE FOR AN IN DEPOSITS; BY AMENDING SECTION 52.34, "WATER RATES", SUBSECTION (B) , "MONTHLY RATES", TO PROVIDE FOR AN INCREASE IN COMMODITY CHARGES BY NETEI~ED CONSUMPTION, BY ENACTING A NEW SUBSECTION (C), "EHERGENCY RATE ADJUSTHZNT FOR WATER CONSERVATION", TO PROVIDE FOR A SURCHARGE DURING PERIODS OF MANDATED WATER R~STRICTIONS, BY R~DESIGNATING SUBSECTIONS (C) AND (D) TO (D) A2m (u), BY AK~NDING SUBSECTION (E) TO DEFINE A BILLING CYCLI; BY AKENDING SECTION 52.36, "CHARGE FOR ~ACH TII~ WATER lB TURNID ON", TO ADD AN EXCEPTION; BY A/~NDING SECTION 52.37, "TEKPORARY USE; TAPPING CHARGES AND DEPOSZT", TO BE I~DESIGNATED SECTZON $2.38; BY A/(ENDING SECTION 52.38, "SERVICE CHARGE FOR AFTER HOUR CALLS", TO BE REDESIGNATED SECTION 52.37; BY AMENDING (NEWLY HEDESIGNATED) SECTION 52.37,. "SERVIC~ CHARGE FOR AFTER HOUR CAL~", TO ADD THI WORDS "IF APPLICABLE"; BY AMENDING SECTION 52.39, "OTHER FEES", BY ENACTING & NEW SUBSECTION (E}, "M~TEIt it~J~ CHARGE", TO PROVIDE FOR A SKRVZCI CHARGE FOR METER RIRIADS i~UBSTED BY THE rr~JSTOi~R~ BY ENACTING A NEW SUBSECTION ( "REMOVAL OF SERVICE LINE", TO PROVIDE FOR A SBRVICl CHAAGE FOR THE REMOVAL OIP A SERVICE LINEo BY ENACTING A NEW SUBfECTXOM (O), "RIXNSTALLATXON OF A SeRViCE LINE", TO PROVXDE FOR A SB3~VXCE CHARGE FOR THE RBXNBTAT-T-i. TION OF A SKRVXCB LXNB, AND BY ENACTING A NEW SUBSECTION "DESTRUCTION OF METER AND/OR HELATED EQ(JIPMENT" TO PROVIDE FOR CHARGES IN THI EVENT OF DESTRUCTION OF A NETER AND/OR RELATED EQUIPMENT; BY A~ENDING SECTION 52.50, "P.~NDERING OF BILLS; WHeN PAYIq~NT DUB**, TO DEFINI A BILLING CYCLe; BY AMENDING SECTION 52.52, "RESUMING SERVIC~ AFTER DISCONTINUANCE FOR DELINQUENCY", SUBSECTION (A) , TO CLARIFY THE RECONNECTION CHA~GE; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE; PROVIDING A GENERAL ~.EPEA.LIR CLAUSE ARD AR EFFECTIVE DATE. NOW, TH~RRFORI, BE IT ORDAINED BY THI CITY COP/MISSION OF TH~ CITY OF DBLRAY BRACH, FLORIDA, A~ FOLLOWEr OlqO. NO. 55-93 {1) There shall be a wa=er connecc£on charge of $?88 per connec~£on of each rea£den=i&l E~dZZ~ uni~. A one residential connection ia here£n defined =o be an~ family liv£ng ~n£~, and~ where more f~mi~iel ace l~v£ng on =he I~me premi~el, each sh&~l be considered al ~epara~e residential dwelling unit. ~n apar~menC build£ngl, condomin~uml, coopera=ivel, duplexel, reeorc dwelling units, and =he like, and per each connec=ioa charge which shall be baled on -$788 per Equivalent Necec S~ze Conn~t~on ~-~/2 3.33 2~24.04 ~ 5.33 4~200.04 Sec=ion 4. Thit S~Lon S2.33, "Di~liC ~o GuKuCfl PI~nC', of =he Code of Ocd~nincel of ~ CL~y o~ De~cly kich, ~or~di, ~1 heceby Mnd~ _ e~ch con~c oc ~ v~Lng 4ccocdLng Co che eL&e of ~hl Mcec ~n use, ~100.00 ~12S.00 * (B) Monthly rates. The monthly rates (except for fire hydrants &s set forth in Section 52.03) for water furnished by the water facilities or plant of the city to customers within and outside the corporate limits of the city, which unless otherwise indicated shall include the customer charges, capacity charges, and commodity charges for all custom- ers, ars fixed as shown in the following schedule: Type of Customer City CitZ Residential Customer charge (~er meter) $ 1.$5 $ 1.93 Capacity charge (charged to all customers, per residential dwelling unit) $ 7.62 $ 9.53 Co~odity charge (all metered conlumption-per 1,000 gallons): ~99 Zero to 3,000 gallons 1.00 1.25 4,000 to 20,000 gallons 1.10 1.38 21r000 to 35,000 gallons 1.20 1.50 36,000 to 50,000 gallons 1.30 ~ Abo~e 50,000 ~allons 1.50 Ncnrssidsn~ial and ~~&~ Irrigation Cultomer charge (per miter) $ 1.55 $ 1.93 Cagacit¥ charge (baled upon meter size): 3/4-inch mi~er $ 7.62 $ 9.$3 1-£~ch miter 12.73 1S. 9~ ~-1/2-£~ch meter 25.38 ~1.73 2-inch m~tar 40.63 SO. 78 3-inch meter 88.95 111.19 4-inch meter 160.07 6-inch meter 35S.73 444.66 Commodity charge (all metered conlum~tion-per 1,000 g&llonl): &~ 1.10 ~ 1.38 No=s: Whenever both residential and nonresidential Ullrl I.TI on the ~e'er,. ~he capacity charge is to be c~puted the nonresidential OP.D. NO. SS-g3 Sect£on 9. That (newly redslignated) Section 52.37, "Service Charge for After Hour Calll", of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, is hereby amended to read as follows= A charge of $40 in addition to ~){~ any applicable turn on/turn off ~ /~~Z city personnel between 5:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. and on Saturdays, Sundays and holidays. Sectio~ 10. Tha~ S~tion 52.39, "~her Fees", Sublect&on (E), "Me,Ir Reread Charge", Subl~ion (F), "R~va~ of Service iisi", Subl~:ion (~), "Rlinl:allation of a Service Line", and Subsidies (H), "Dml~ruc21on of Meter and/or Related ~i~ln~", of the Code o~ Ordinances of ~hm Cl~F o~ De,ray B~ach, Florida, a~e hl~y Inact~d to rtad al foX,owl: (E) Meter Reread Charge. There will ~ a charge of IlS fo~ each favor of tho cult~r, tho accoun~ Wi~% .bi. ad.~ult~ accordin~lx and t~ SIS (F) R~val of Slrvicl Line. Therl will bi a charge f~r the removal of the service line ~al~ on the ACtua~ COI~ ~l~Or and ~lul a 10% lurchar~l, o= $100 whichever il grla~l~ .~= occurrence. reinacallation of a service ~ini bal~ u~n th9 Actual ce~lac~nc col~ (l~or charge bae~ u~n a~ua% replac~nt cost (l~r ~ ~cer~a~e) ~lue a 10% au~cfia~,~e~ cc ~100 wh~che~c ~a ~ceater, ~r oc~ccence. S~lon 11. That S~tion 52.50, "Rendering o~ BLll8; ~en Paint Due", of t~ ~e o~ Ordinances of the City cf 0e~ray Beach, f~o=ldl, (A) BI11I for IXX wiclr ilrv~=t, ~ncXud~g tht cult~= ch,rge, capacity charge, and c~dity charge, shal~ be rende~ to each CUller (tht _ potion whose n~ the account Is in) u~n iniCallacion of the miter, and on a monthl~ balil thereafter, and Ihal~ bm due and ~y~le forthwith. OH. ~. SS-93 COMPARISON RESIDENTIAL WATER BILL Present Rate - Prol3osecl Rate % Change 0C0' :S RATE - EEC ~ ~ 0.20 $~0.~7 -0.88% 28 ~3g ~g ~40~ 7 2 11.35 11 17 -1 50% 2g , 4078 41 37 ~ 45% 3 12.~ 1217 -~.17% 30 ~ e7 ~57 4 1 353 13,27 - ~ g2% 31 42 g~ 43 77 5 14.02 14.37 - 1 71% 32 44 05 4~ g7 6 15.71 15.47 -1.53% 33 45.14 48,17 2 28% 7 1~.80 1~.57 -1,37% 34 4~.23 47 37 2.47% 8 17.8g ~7.e7 -123% 35 47.32 48.57 2 g 18.g8 18.77 -1.11% 3~ 48.41 4977 2.81% 10 20.07 I g.87 -'1.00% 37 4g.flO 50 g7 11 21.18 30.g7 -0.g0% 38 50.5g 5217 12 2225 22.07 -0.81% 3g 51 .~8 5337 3.27% 13 23.34 23,17 -0.73% 40 52.77 54 57 3.41% 14 24.43 24.27 -0.05% 41 53.8~ 55 77 3 55% 1 fl 2552 25.37 -0 fig% 42 54gfl 5~.g7 ~6 20.01 20.57 -0.15% 43 5e04 58 ~7 3 80% 17 27.70 27.57 -0.47% 44 57.13 5g 37 3 18 28.7g 28.~7 -0,42% 45 58~2 0057 4 04% lg 2g.~S 2g.77 -0.37% 4e 5931 ~1.77 4 20 30.07 30.87 -0 32% 47 60.40 62 g7 4 25% ~2 33.15 33.07 -0 24% 40 e2.S8 05 37 ~ 48% 23 34.25 34.17 -0.23% 50 63e7 O~ 57 4 55% 24 3533 35.37 0.11% 55 ~g.12 72.57 4 25 3~.42 3~.57 0.41% 00 74.57 78.77 503% 2~ 37.51 37.77 0~0% 70 95.47 gl 77 7 37% 27 38.~0 38.97 0.~% 75 gO 02 08 27 8 08% ,=aim ~each Cour~v L~es - ~d bl~ mrs ~ ~ 1~1 ,~ TOT~ B~ ~ ~1 ~~ ~ ~.75 ~ - ~M 1~ ~-~ -. ~.~ 11M ~a h~gh~ TOT~ B~ ~ ~1 ~ C~N~I~ 5.~ ~0.~ 15.~ ~,~ ~,~ C~ ~ C~t ~ngs ' 8 24 ~ 21 31 ~ 47 87 72.27 C~ d ~e¢ie~O B~ch !~ 01 17 IB ~ 43.17 ~a~ ~l~es ~ ~ 4343 71 ~ !07~ ~Y ~ - PRE~ $14~ ~07 ~ ~1 87 ~Y B~ - PR~O~ $14.37 $1987 ~ 37 ~2.~ ~.~ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1 SUPPORT DOCUMENT # 3 WASTEWATER EFFLUENT REUSE PURPOSE: This report updates the status of programs to reuse wastewater effluent from the Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. Reuse of sewage effluent to conserve groundwater resources is cited in a number of policies in the Comprehensive Plan. Events occurring since the adoption of the Plan will result in implementation of strategies to conserve this resource. These events also identify the need to readdress the City's direction toward wastewater effluent reuse as stated in the Plan. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DIRECTION: The Comprehensive Plan calls for programs and activities to reduce water consumption, minimize waste, and protect water resources to mitigate against future water shortages. The Plan also seeks to mitigate against the adverse impacts of point source pollution. One of the target areas of these efforts is the reuse of effluent from the Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. The objectives of the Comprehensive Plan relative to these target areas are expressed through the following policies. Conservation Element, Policy A-4.7 Policy A-4.7 The City shall continue its present policy of requiring a water source, other than City water, for irrigation purposes in geographically defined areas of the City. The City shall also pursue the use of discharge water, from the Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, for irrigation purposes. This program shall be explored through the joint efforts of the District Board and the Cities of Boynton Beach and Delray Beach. This item is in the Regional Board FY 92/93 work program. Public Facilities Element, Policies A-1.2 and B-3.1 Policy A-1.2 Even though current standards for ocean discharge of effluent are being met, the use of ocean discharge may not, in the long term, be an acceptable method of disposal of effluent. A program for the reuse of effluent from the Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant shall be presented to the Regional Board by June 1, 1993. (See Policy B-2.1 Conservation Element Policy A-4.7). Policy B-2.1 The alternative of enhancing the water supply through the recycling of discharge from the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), after tertiary treatment, and then used either as a source of potable water, and/or irrigation water, and/or aquifer recharge shall be explored through technical studies. PLANT HISTORY: The Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant is owned by the Cities of Delray Beach and Boynton Beach, and is operated by the South Central Wastewater Treatment Facility Board. The facility _ serves an area comprising Delray Beach, Boynton Beach, Gulfstream, Briny Breezes, Highland Beach and the Village of Golf. The plant was constructed in 1979 as a 12 MGD plant and expanded in 1987, doubling the capacity to 24 MGD. This design capacity is established by its secondary treatment capacity. In 1991, an -- Odor Abatement Project was completed. Ultimate disposal of discharges from the plant is by ocean _ outfall for sewage effluent. The ocean outfall line is located at Atlantic Ave., with the outfall approximately one mile offshore. WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN UPDATE - RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEM: The 1989-90 drought focussed increased attention on effluent disposal practices by wastewater treatment plants and led to additional regulatory review by Florida Department of Environmental Regulation and South Florida Water Management District. During permitting of the odor abatement project, conditions were added requiring the Wastewater Treatment Plant Master Plan to be updated to address reclaimed water. In addition, use of the ocean outfall came under increased scrutiny. The consultant firm of Camp, Dresser & McKee completed an update to the Wastewater Master Plan in July, 1991, as part of an extension of the operating permit. In that study, the feasibility of implementing a reclaimed water system was addressed. South Florida Water Management District has designated most of its jurisdictional area, including the Wastewater Treatment Plant service area, a critical water supply problem area. State regulations require the establishment of mandatory reuse programs in such areas, unless reuse is not technically, economically, or environmentally feasible. As a result, the Board has identified the need to be proactive and address past water shortages, increasing water demands, and the promotion of reclaimed water. Page 2 RECLAIMED WATER REUSE: In 1992, the State established new rules for water reuse, setting criteria for the establishment of reclaimed water programs. The consulting firm of Brown and Caldwell completed a Reclaimed Water System Feasibility Study in June, 1993 in accordance with these new rules. This study analyzes the possible methods of effluent disposal, including irrigation, infiltration, well injection, and canal discharge. The study found that infiltration and well injection of treated effluent are too expensive for further consideration. Two alternatives, which compare favorably in cost are Public Access Urban Reuse (irrigation), and Canal Recharge. Canal recharge puts treated effluent into the ground water system through surface water bodies. One method is to pipe the effluent west to discharge into wetlands just west of the Turnpike. The other method is to pipe effluent directly to canals via pump stations. The canal recharge alternative requires additional investigation regarding the impacts on the canal system, integration into the South Florida Water Management District Regional Plan, and permitting issues. If investigation results are favorable, this alternative has the potential to reuse 24 MGD of effluent, or the entire capacity of the Wastewater Treatment Plant. The total cost of direct canal recharge over 15 years is estimated at $32,647,000. Wetland canal recharge, over 15 years, carries a significantly higher cost, at $71,244,000. The other feasible alternative is public access urban reuse. This involves piping treated effluent to large irrigation users to replace the need for withdrawals from wells or surface water sources. The most obvious of these users are golf courses. If fully implemented, this alternative has the potential to reuse 18 MGD of effluent. The total cost of public access urban reuse is estimated at $35,730,000 over 15 years. The feasibility study's recommended action plan consists of two parts: A minimal level program using public access urban reuse (the Northeast Quadrant Reclaimed Water System), and further investigation regarding groundwater recharge. The proposed program will treat 4 million gpd of effluent to an advanced level of treatment for irrigation of golf courses located between Congress Ave. and Military Tr., and between the Wastewater Treatment Plant and Boynton Beach Blvd. Golf courses receiving reclaimed water for irrigation will pay between $0.20 and $0.24 per 1000 gallons for this resource. The net cost of construction (including design and legal) in this program is $9,000,000., half of which will be borne by Delray Beach. The impact on City of Delray Beach utility rates for this phase will be an increase of approximately 3.2%. Page 3 PROGRAM STATUS: Contracts with the golf courses in the Northeast Quadrant - Reclaimed Water System are being negotiated and should be in place by July, 1994, according to Bob Hagel, Executive Director of the Board. Currently, the project calls for irrigating the following golf courses with reclaimed water: Hunters Run, Country Club of Florida, Delray Dunes, Quail Ridge, and Pine Tree. Once the contracts are complete, the Board will authorize _ Brown & Caldwell to begin preliminary design of the project. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: * The Wastewater Treatment Facility Board has approved the Northeast Quadrant Reclaimed Water System project for Public Access Urban Reuse (golf course irrigation). -- * The Wastewater Treatment Facility Board has authorized further study of groundwater recharge of wastewater, either through direct canal recharge or wetland recharge. * The techniques for full implementation of wastewater effluent reuse will depend upon the results of the - authorized feasibility studies. * Effluent pumped from the ocean outfall has never exceeded _ State standards for ocean discharge. The ocean outfall will not be completely abandoned, even when reclaimed water is fully implemented. This structure must remain to dispose of excess wastewater effluent, particularly in the -- rainy season. RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: -- The policies in the Comprehensive Plan dealing with wastewater effluent reuse should be REVISED to better describe the on-going __ projects and activities of the South Central Wastewater Treatment Facility Board. Conservation Element, Policy A-4.7 may be divided into a -- maintenance policy and an action policy. Policy A-4.7a The City shall continue its present policy -- of requiring a water source, other than City water, for irrigation purposes in geographically defined areas of the City. _ Policy A-4.Tb The City~ through the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Board, shall implement the Northeast Quadrant Reclaimed Water System to reclaim a portion of the -~ effluent from the Wastewater Treatment Plant for irrigation purposes. The City, through the Wastewater Treatment Facility Board~ shall also explore the feasibility of the _- reuse of wastewater effluent for groundwater recharge in FY 93/94. Based upon the results of this feasibility study Page 4 -- the City~ through the Wastewater Treatment Facility Board~ may develop a program to fully implement the reclamation and reuse of sewaqe wastewater effluent in the future. Public Facilities Element, Policy A-1.2 may be revised to better define the City's policy direction toward the ocean outfall. Policy A-1.2 Even though current standards for ocean discharge of effluent are being met, the use of ocean discharge may not, in the long term, be an acceptable method ~f for the normal disposal of all~ or even the majority, of effluent. A program to fully implement the reclamation and reuse of sewaqe effluent may be developed by the City, through the Wastewater Treatment Facility Board in the future. ~ ~t~t~ f~ EM~ t~ ~f ~ffl~ME ~t~fl~ ~ ~ ~~! ~t~ ~ ~ X~ Xgg~L (See Public Facilities Policy B-2.1 Conservation Element Policy A-4.Tb). Public Facilities Objective B-2 may be revised to better address the City's policy direction regarding the future provision of an adequate water supply. Objective B-2 Even though the City has projected an adequate water supply, it shall provide for increasing draw and the potential of reduced capacity throuqh salt water intrusion and/or extended drouqht conditions through increased use of existing wells, development of new wells and development of alternative technoloqies and methods of providinq water. objective shall be met in the performance of the following: (2b) Public Facilities Policy B-2.1 may be revised to place a specific project policy regarding wastewater reuse in the Public Facilities Element. Policy B-2.1 ~¢~Z ~~J The City, through the Reqional Wastewater Treatment Facility Board, shall implement the Northeast Quadrant Reclaimed Water System to reclaim a portion of the effluent from the Wastewater Treatment Plant Page for irrigation purposes. The City, through the Wastewater Treatment Facility Board~ shall also explore the feasibility of the reuse of wastewater effluent for groundwater recharge in FY 93/94. Based upon the results of this feasibility study the City, through the Wastewater Treatment Facility Board, may develop a program to fully implement the reclamation and reuse of sewage wastewater effluent in the future. T: \AT: \advanced\EFFL Page COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1 SUPPORT DOCL~[ENT !? 4 EMERGENCY MANAGEMEN~r ORDINANCE NO. 7-92 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 95, "CIVIL DEFENSE AND EMERGENCIES", OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, BY REPEALING CHAPTER 95, "CIVIL DEFENSE AND EMERGENCIES", AND BY ENACTING A NEW CHAPTER 95, "EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT"; TO PROVIDE A FRAMEWORK FOR DECLARATION OF EMERGENCIES, PROVIDING FOR DEFINITIONS; APPLICABILITY OF PROVISIONS; EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE; POWERS, DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES; DECLARATION OF STATE OF EMERGENCY; TERMINATION OF A STATE OF EMERGENCY; POLICE EMERGENCIES; FIRE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS EMERGENCIES; UTILITY EMERGENCIES; WEATHER EMERGENCIES; SUSPENSION OF LOCAL BUILDING REGULATIONS; CERTIFICATION OF EMERGENCY CONDITIONS; AND PENALTIES; PROVIDING A GENERAL REPFJ%LER CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City Com~nission of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, by enacting this legislation, to provide the necessary organization, powers and authority to enable the timely and effective use of all available City resources to prepare for, respond to, and recover from emergencies, natural and man-made, likely to affect the security, safety or health of the City of Delray Beach and its residents; and, WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City Commission that nothing contained within this ordinance shall relieve City Departments of their normally assigned duties, responsibilities and functions; and, WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Commission that nothing contained within this ordinance shall be construed as a delegation of authority to abridge or diminish the legislative or administrative powers of the City Commission; and, WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Commission to 'address all types of emergencies including, but not limited to, the preservation of the public peace as defined within Florida Statutes Section 870.041 et seq; and, WHEREAS, the City Commission is authorized to create emergency management plans, pursuant to Florida Statutes Chapter 252. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY CSM~MISSION OF THE CiTY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Chapter 95, "Civil Defense and cf Delray Emergencl~= , of the Ccde of Ordinances of the City Beach, Florida, be, and the s~T~e is hereby repeaie~ in its entirety. Section 2. That a new Chapter 95, "Emergency C -= Delray Managem_nt , of the Code of ordinances of the ity Beach, Florida, be, and the same is hereby enacted %g read as follows: Chapter 95 - "EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT" 95.01 Definitions 95.02 Applicability of Provisions 95.03 Emergency Management Structure 95.04 Powers, Duties and Responsibilities 95.05 Declaration of a State of Emergency 95.06 Termination of a State of Emergency 95.09 Police Emergencies 95.10 Fire and Hazardous Materials Emergencies 95.11 Utility Emergencies 95.12 Weather Emergencies 95.13 Suspension of Local Building Regulations 95.14 Certification of Emergency Conditions 95.99 Penalty Section 95.01 Definitions. As used in this Chapter: (A) Emergency shall mean a condition which threatens or adversely affects the public health, safety or security and which is or threatens to be beyond the control of those public and private agencies normally responsible for the management of such a condition, resulting from an act or imminent threatened act of war, riot, terrorism, mob or other acts of violence; from conflagration, explosion, hazardous materials incident or release; from a weather event such as a flood, hurricane or tornado; from a disruption in the City's utility system; or from any other cause. (B) Normal Average Price shall mean the price at retail for merchandise, goods or services at which similar merchandise, goods or services were being sold during the ninety (90) days immediately preceding a declaration of public emergency. Section 95.02 Applicability of Provisions. All officers, employees, contractors, vendors, boards, commissions, authorities and other agencies of the City are subject to the provisions of this chapter. Section 95.03 Emergency Management Structure. (A) The City Manager or his designee shall perform the functzon of Director of Emergency Management and shall implement, manage and report on all actions authorized and taken under the provisions of this chapuer. (B) The City Manager er his designee shall appoint a Coor!inatcr of Emergency Services whose duties shall include the ongoing planning for and cooriinatlcn cf those articns necessary for the :-~ m~!ntenance of an e~fective emergency creatl3y. ~.~ .~ - r~-~e casabi!ity ts prepare for and manare emergency conditions. - 2 - Ord. No. 7-92 Section 95.04 Powers~ Duties and Responsibilities. (A) The City Manager, or Acting City Manager, when acting as the Director of Emergency Management, shall have the following powers, duties and responsibilities: (1) To declare or recommend a declaration of emergency pursuant to Section 95.05. To inform the Mayor and Vice Mayor and the City Commission of the reasons for and status of events requiring the declaration. (2) To direct the creation, revision and the exercise of emergency response plans conforming to state and county emergency plans for the mitigation of, preparation for, response to, and recovery from emergencies; and to exercise all powers permitted by Florida Statutes Chapter 252. (3) To assist the efforts of the Coordinator of Emergency Services in preparation for, response to, and recovery from, emergency conditions; (4) To recommend a budget to the City Commission for the creation and maintenance of an emergency response capability as provided herein. (5) To promulgate emergency regulations necessary for the protection of life and property, establishment of public order, and control of adverse conditions affecting public welfare resulting from an emergency, to the City Commission. (B) The Coordinator of Emergency Services shall have the following responsibilities and duties: (1) To supervise the development and maintenance of City emergency plans, including annual updates; (2) To plan for and develop an emergency operations control center to include equipment, manning, and operational procedures necessary to the management and control of emergency conditions; (3} T~ ~evelop and manage the City's emergency awareness public information program. {4/ Tc ~repare and submit an annual operating ~et to the City Manager related to Emergency Management Activities, preparations an! training. - 3 - Ord. No. 7-92 Section 95.05 Declaration of a State of Emergency. (A) The Mayor, Vice Mayor, City Manager, or the Acting City Manager, in the order named, shall have the authority to declare a state of emergency. Upon the absence or unavailability of the Mayor, the Vice Mayor may issue such a declaration, and upon the absence or unavailability of Mayor and the Vice Mayor, the City Manager may issue such declaration, or upon the absence or unavailability of the City Manager, the Acting City Manager may issue such a declaration. (B) Any declaration of a state of emergency and all emergency regulations activated under the provisions of this chapter shall be confirmed by the City Commission by resolution no later than at the next regular meeting, unless the nature of the emergency renders a meeting of the City Commission extremely impractical. Confirmation of the emergency declaration shall disclose the reasons for, anticipated impacts of, actions proposed and taken to manage the emergency, and other pertinent data relating to the emergency requiring the declaration. (C) Emergency resolutions authorized by this chapter shall include, but are not limited to, the following subjects: Resolution Subject A Evacuation B Curfews; Declaration of areas off limits C Suspension or regulation of the sale of, or offer to sell, with or without consideration: alcoholic beverages; ammunition; firearms; explosives; or combustibles D Prohibiting the sale of merchandise, goods or services at more than the average retail price E Water use restrictions F Suspension of local building regulations G Regulating the use of and rationing of fuel, ice and other essentials H Emergency procurement proce~ares - 4 - Ord. No. 7-92 (D) A declaration of a state of emergency shall activate the emergency plans applicable to the City. A declaration of a state of emergency shall automatically invoke the emergency measures listed in Florida Statutes, Section 870.044, if the emergency relates to overt acts of violence or the imminent threat of such violence. (E) A state of emergency, when declared as provided herein, shall continue in effect from day to day until declared to be terminated; however, provided that a state of emergency declared pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 870.041 et seq. shall commence upon the declaration thereof and shall terminate at the end of a period of seventy-two (72) consecutive hours thereafter, unless, prior to the end of such seventy-two (72) hour period the public official or City official declaring the emergency shall have terminated such state of emergency. An extension of the seventy-two {72) hour time limit must be accomplished by a request from the public official and the concurrence of the City Commission, by duly enacted resolution · (F) Upon the 4eclaration of a state of emergency, the City Manager shall post a written notice of such declaration upon the main bulletin board in City Hall, and shall, as promptly as practicable, file in the office of the City Clerk a notice of a declared state of emergency, or emergency measure declared or ordered and promulgated by virtue of Florida Statutes Section 870.041 et seq. The City Manager shall notify the local media by telephone, if practicable. When practicable, the City Manager shall also cause written notice to be published, in its entirety, at least three (3) days each week, in the newspaper of general circulation in the City until the state of emergency is declared to be terminated. Section 95.06 Termination of a State of Emergency. A state of emergency shall be terminated by a vote of the City Commission if practicable or upon the certification of the person who originally requested the declaration of the state of emergency, that the conditions leading to or causing the emergency no longer exist and the City's agencies and departments are able to manage the situation without extraordinary assistance; provided that a state of emergency established under Florida Statutes Section 870.041 et seq., shall terminate at the end of a period of seventy-two (72) consecutive hours after the declaration of the emergency, unless, prior to the end of the seventy-two (72) hour pericd~ the pub' !c official calling for a declaration of emer~enc':' or %he City Commission have terminated such state of emergency. Any extension of the seventy-two {72) h3ur time limit must be accomplished by a ~ .... =~ from public official and concurrence of the City Ccr~isslcn by duly enacted resolution. Notice of termination sf the emergency deciarat!on shall be ma~e ~c the putl;r by the City Manager by the same means as ~e~.. notice the declaration of the state of emergency. - 5 - Ord. No. 7-92 Section 95.09 Police Emergencies. (A) A public emergency may be declared because of civil unrest or imminent threat to public peace or order when the Chief of Police, or if unavailable, the next highest ranking officer in the Police Department chain of command, certifies to the City Manager (or, if unavailable, the Acting City Manager) that an emergency condition arising from hostile actions of others, armed or unarmed or other imminent threat to public peace or order, requires extraordinary measures for control, -- including, but not limited to curfew; blockade; proscription of the sale of firearms and other weapons, alcoholic beverages; explosives and combustibles; evacuation; and other like actions. _ The City Manager, or if unavailable, the Acting City Manager, shall report said certification to the officials in the order named in Section 95.05 regarding the need to declare a state of emergency. Pursuant to Section 95.05, a -- declaration of emergency may then issue. (B) Declaration of a public emergency because of civil unrest or imminent threat to public peace or order, shall authorize the issuance of emergency resolutions A, B, C, D and H, and other appropriate resolutions, as may be required and may, if applicable, require automatic emergency -- measures pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 870.044 et seq. In addition, additional discretionary emergency measures pursuant to Florida Statutes 870.045 may be issued. Section 95.10 Fire and Hazardous Materials Emergencies. (A) A public emergency may be declared because of fire -- or a hazardous materials incident emergency when the Fire Chief, or if unavailable, the next highest ranking officer in the Fire Department chain of command, certifies to the City Manager (or, if unavailable, the Acting City Manager) that an actual or potential condition arising from fire, explosion, chemical spill or release, building or bridge collapse, or plane, train, or _ other vehicle accident, requires extraordinary measures for control, including, but not limited to calling out of off-duty and reserve personnel; assistance by outside agencies; evacuation; and other like actions. The City Manager, or if unavailable, the Acting City Manager, shall report said certification to the officials, in the order named in ~--~' _=~lon 95 05 regarding the need to declare a sta~e of emergency. Pursuant to Section -- 95.05, a de?isration of emergency may tken issue. (B) Declarationv~ a public emergency because of fire and ha~ardru$ material emergency shall authorize __ the issua~re cf emergency resolutions A, B, C, D, E, G anl H.~ a~ other a~propriate resoluticns, as may be re~rei. - 6 - Ord. No. 7-92 Section 95.11 Utility Emergencies. (A) A public emergency may be declared because of utility conditions when the Director of Environmental Services Department, or if unavailable, the next highest ranking Environmental Services Department official, certifies to the City Manager (or, if unavailable, the Acting City Manager) that: (1) A condition exists or is imminent that endangers the safety, potability, quantity, availability, collection, conveyance, transmission, distribution, treatment, or storage of water or waste water through or within the City's water or waste water utility system; or, {2) a condition exists or is imminent that endangers the safety, quality, quantity, availability, transmission, distribution, or storage of gas through or within the City's gas utility system; and, (3) extraordinary actions to control and correct the situation are required, including, but not limited to emergency purchase; call-in of off-duty personnel; assistance by other communities and agencies; and other like actions. The City Manager, or, if unavailable, the Acting City Manager, shall report said certification to the officials, in the order named in Section 95.05 regarding the need to declare a state of emergency. Pursuant to Section 95.05, a declaration of emergency may then issue. {B) Declaration of a public emergency because of utility conditions shall authorize the issuance of emergency resolutions A, B, E and H, and other appropriate resolutions, as may be required. Section 95.12 Weather Emergencies. (A) A public emergency may be declared because of weather conditions when the national weather service or a state, county or local emergency management agency informs the City or the public that emergency conditions resulting from meteorological conditions are present or im~inent. Meteorological conditions covered by this section shall include, but are not limited to hurricanes, floods, tornados, or other severe weather conditions a~J the results therefrom. The City Manager, er, ~f unavailable, the Actinc C~tv Manager, =~.a~! request a declaration of a S~ate o? Emergency from the officials in the order named in Section 95.05. Pursuan~ to Section 95.05, a declaration of er. ergency may then issue. - 7 - Ord. No. 7-92 (B) Declaration of a public emergency because of weather conditions shall authorize the issuance of emergency resolutions A through ~, and other appropriate resolutions, as may be required. Section 95.13 Suspension of Local Buildinq Regulations. The City Manager (or, if unavailable, the Acting City Manager) may authorize a suspension of local building regulations during and following a declared state of emergency when the Chief Building Official certifies to the City Manager or, if unavailable, the Acting City Manager, that such action is necessary for the expeditious restoration of property damaged by the emergency event. Such suspension of building regulations may be applied on a case by case basis as required to remedy specific conditions and to facilitate the provision of emergency housing to disaster victims. The Chief Building Official shall specify the provisions of the building code to be suspended and the reasons therefore, when certifying the necessity of such suspension to the City Manager. The City Manager shall communicate to the City Commission the need to suspend, local building regulations to the officials, in the order named in Section 95.05(A). The City Commission shall confirm the suspension pursuant to Section 95.05(B). Section 95.14 Certification of Emerqency Conditions. A certification of emergency conditions to the City Manager may be verbal, but each verbal certification shall be confirmed in writing within twenty-four (24) hours following an emergency declaration. Section 95.99 Penalty. Any person, firm or corporation who violates any provision of this chapter for which another penalty is not specifically provided shall, upon conviction, be subject to a fine not exceeding $500, or imprisonment for a term not exceeding ninety (90) days, or both. Each day a new violation shall continue to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 3. That should any section or provision of this ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence or w~rd be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity cf the remainder hereof as a whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. Section 4. That all ordinances cr parts of or!inances in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed. Section 5. That this ordinance shai' become effe~ ir~ediately upon passage on second and final reading. - 8 - Ord. No. 7-92 PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final reading on this the llth day of February , 1992. ATTEST: ~' City Q~lerk First Reading January 21, 1992 Second Reading Februarv 11, 199l - 9 - Ord. No. 7-92 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1 SUPPORT DOCUMENT BLOOD'S GROVE CITY COMMISSION DOCUMENTATION TO: DAVID T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER THRU: DIANE DOMINGUEZ, D~REC~I~OR DEPARTMENT ~F PLANNING AND ZONING FROM: PAUL DORLING, P{~¥NCIPAL PLANNER * NOTE: APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED A CONTINUANCE OF THIS ITEM TO THE MAY 17 MEETING. SUBJECT: MEETING OF MAY 3, 1994 FUTURE'LAND USE AMENDMENT FROM C(NJNTY MR-5 TO CITY LAND USE DESIGNATIONS OF LD (LOW DENSITY), MD (MEDIUM DENSITY),. CC (COMMERCIAL CORE), AND OS (OPEN SPACE) . FOR THE BLOODS GROVE PROPERTY. ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION: The action requested of the City Commission is that of transmittal of a Future Land Use Plan Map amendment and Comprehensive Plan text amendment which includes the fol lowing components: * A Future Land Use Map change from County MR-5 (Medium Residential-§ units per acre) to City Land Use designations of LD (Low Density - 39 acres), MD (Medium Density - 40 acres), CC (Commercial Core - l0 acres) and OS (Open Space - 4 acres) for Bloods Grove. * Text change to the commercial core definition in the Future Land Use Map element of the Comprehensive Plan * LocatioD~l change of the future city collector street currently proposed along the west border of the Bloods Grove property. The 93 acre property is being processed as a part of Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1. The property is located on the south side of Linton Bculevard east of Military Trail. BACKGROUND: With the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan in November, 1989, "advisory" land use designaticns were a.Dplie~i ts all areas 'which were outside the City limit= ~ .... ~'i%hin %t.e City's Area. The 1~'~ .cede ~ acre B~ 3rc-.'e _=i-e '-'a~ ~i.,.~- designations as follows: 40 acres Medium 2e?.si%y Resiaential, 39 acres Low Density Residential, 17 acres Co--m-unity Facilities, 10 acres Commercial Core, and 4 acres Open Space. The 17 acres of Community Facilities have been annexed for a municipal fire station, park and School Site S. The 93 acre balance is the subject of this request. Bloods Land Use Amendment City Commission May 3, 1994 Page 2 Separate petitions have been submitted and are currently being processed for the annexation of the property into the City limits and for initial zoning designations of PRD-Planned Residential Development (83 acres) and SAD-Special Activities District (10 acres). The PRD and SAD zoning districts require submittal of a master development plan and site plan, respectively. Once those plans have been submitted the requests will be reviewed and scheduled for Planning and Zoning Board and City Commission action. ANALYSIS: The proposed amendment will adopt the City's existing advisory designations with the exception'of the location of the 10 acres of Commercial Core. This 10 acres is to be relocated from the center of the site to the area occupied by the existing Bloods commercial operation (northeast corner of the site along Llnton -- Boulevard). The Bloods will be maintaining ownership of the 10 acres and desire to continue and expand on the existing fruit packing and retail operation. The amendment also proposes text changes to the Commercial Core definition which would lloutt the type of commercial uses allowed within Commercia! Core. The Low Density (0-5 units per acre) is proposed along the east -- and south borders adjacent to the Foxe Chase and Del Alre subdivisions; the Medium Density (5-12 units per acre) proposed adjacent to the commercial and office uses to the west -- as well as along Military Trail; and the Open Space accommodates an existing Hammock area. The amendment also includes the relocation of the proposed city collector road currently cited _ along the west property line of Bloods Grove. Concerns were noted regarding two aspects of the applicant's proposal. These involve impacts created by moving the -- commercial component closer to Llnton, which would attract more outside traffic, and the proposal to eliminate a connecting road between Gez~anto~n Road and the new collector road. _ To mitigate the impacts of the relocation of the commercial component, staff recommended a designation of Transitional, as opposed to Commercial Core. This would have the effect of limiting the intensity of allowable non-residential uses. Regarding the road connection, staff notes that it is a concern which requires additional analysis. It may be necessary to require an alternative site plan for the Bloods property which would provide the road in the event tha~ it is deemed to be necessary. The attached Planning and Zoning staff report describes the issues in greater detail. Bloods Land Use Amendment City Commission May 3, 1994 Page 3 A traffic study has been submitted and its conclusions accepted by the Palm Beach Traffic Division. The study emphasizes that Military Trail which currently falls level of service D, will require widening from 4 to 6 lanes under the current, as well as the proposed Land Use designations. The study further notes that at different phases of development improvements to the intersection of Military Trail and Clint Moore Road and the widening of Military Trail (4 lanes to 6 lanes) from Atlantic Avenue south to Clint Moore Road will be required. With these improvements traffic concurrency will be met. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION: The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed the Future land Use Amendment at the April 18, 1994 regular meeting. Eleven people spoke in opposition at the public hearing. The~ included representatives from adjacent homeowner associations ( Foxe Chase, Del Ida, Bel Airs) who opposed the amendment citing increase density (lack of compatibility) and increased traffic~ Several Board members expressed concern with the increase in density, increased traffic, and the relocation of the commercial core component. After a lengthy public discussion the Board recommended the Commercial Core designation be changed to Transitional, and that it remain in the current location (central to the site). The Board also included a restriction that the interior commercial component not be allowed to develop until Blood's packing and retail operation is discontinued. The Board further recommended that the amount of acreage allocated to MD (Medium Density) be reduced so that the land use designations are as follows (see attached exhibit): * 63 acres of Low Density * 16 acres MedlumDensity * 10 acres Transitional * 4 acres Open Space The applicants request would have allowed a max~lum of 480 multi-fam/ly and single fam/1y attached units and 195 single family detached units for a total of (675 units). The applicant intention is to construct 250 multi-family units, 175 attached single family units, and 200 single family detached units for a total of 625 units. Under the Planning and Zoning Board's recommendation a total of 507 units (192 multi-family units and 315 single family units) could be built. It is noted that a minimum of 21 acres of Medium Density residential would be required to build the proposed 250 unit multi-family development indicated in the conceptual master plan. The Planning and Zoning Board recom~.endation regarding the Commercial Core leaves =he Bloods operation in an uncertain status. It would only be allowed to continue until the interior commercial component is developed. This differs significantly from the Blood's proposal, which is to augment the existing operation with compatible retail and office uses in a market-like setting. Bloods Land Use Amendment City Commission May 3, 1994 Page 4 ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: A. Continue with direction. _ B. By motion, based upon a finding that the proposed land use classifications are consistent with those that were -- previously approved with the adoption of the City's advisory land use classifications for unincorporated areas; and that the intensity of the commercial uses and -- compatibility with adjacent properties can be further addressed through the processing of a Master Site and Development Plan and the adoption of a Special Activities _ District, trans.cLt the proposed amendment as par~ of Plan Amendment 94-1 (select one option): 1. Applicants proposal: A change from County MR-5 to City designations of 39 -- acres LD (Low Density), 40 acres of MD (Medium Density), 10 acres CC (Commercial Core) along Llnton Boulevard, 4 acres of OS (Open 'Space); language _ changes to the Commercial Core; and relocation of the City's collector roadway; or 2. Staff recommendation to P&Z: -- A change from County MR-5 to City designations of 39 acres LD (Low Density), 40 acres MD (Medium Density), -- l0 acres of Transitional along Llnton Boulevard, and 4 acres OS (Open Space); recommend no change to the text of Commercial Core; and relocation of the City's collector roadway; or 3. Planninq and Zoninq Board recommendation: A change from County MR-5 to City designations of 63 acres of LD (Low Density), 16 acres MD (Medium Density), 10 acres Transitional in the center of the _ site and 4 acres of OS (Open Space); recommend no changes to the text of Commercial Core; and relocation of the City's collector roadway; C. Deny the FLUM designation changes based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to compatibility . Bloods Land Use Amendment City commission May 3, 1994 Page 5 RECOMMENDED ACTION~ orion based upon a finding that the proposed land use By m ._. , ........ ~nsistent with those that were classifications ?il .~r2, .,~ adontion of the City's previous Y PP advisory land use classifications for unincorporated areas, that the intensity of the commercial uses and and L ~eh adjacent properties can be furthe~ compauiblll~y "~'"~_ ~ ...... J~., n~ Master Site an~ addressed throug ~ of a Special Activities Development Plan and the adoption District, transmit the proposed amendment as part of Plan Amendment 94-1 for a change from County MR-5 to City designations of 39 acres LD (Low Density), 40 acres MD (Medium Density), 10 acres of Transitional along Linton Boulevard, and 4 acres OS (Open Space); recommend no change to the text of Commercial Core; and relocation of the City's collector roadway. Attachment: · Planning and Zoning Board report of April 18, 1994 · P&Z recommendation Land Use Map a:bloccdoc.doc PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---S]AFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: April 18, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: V.C. ITEM: Future Land Use Map ,~nendment Changing the FL[~ Designation from County MR-5 to the Following City Designations: OS, LDR, MDR & CC; for Blood's Hammock Groves GENERAL DATA: ~, a~ch o~ Ltfltofl M~I~ ~tty lealdenttml, C~tel Co~o, ~n unt~s ~r ac~o) Pro.sad ~nd Use Plan...l~onfl~atlon of ~o existing CtW advtso~ ~ cou.~y zont~ ............ ~ (~rt~x~.re~ P~o~8~ Zoning .......... S~ (S~L/[ Activities D/st=Ici) and ~velo~flC ) (~ltlplm F~ly ~s/don~/ml S~ce Sou~h: ~ I~ l-l-~ (Single F~Iy Restden[tal ) MIB~: A, ~, ~ (Pla~ Office ~/SE (Single Y~ly facility and associat~ retail c~erclal uses, approxl~ely 21 acres of ~itt-f~ily (250 units}, approximately }~ acres ~[ single f~!ly de,ach~ {175 ur. its) and attach~ (200 units) wi~ a 4 acre ha~k preee~o are~. Old ~nt~ Road right-of- 12' water ~tn tn NilitaW Trail. S~er Service ............ [sistln~ ~' e~e~ ~in sevin9 ~ire I T E M B E F 0 R E T H E B 0 A R D: The item before the Board is that of making a recommendation on a privateZy initiated Future Land Use Map Amendment and Comprehensive Plan text amendment which includes the following components: * changing the land use designation from County MR-5 (Medium Density Residential- 5 units per acre) to a combination of City LD (Low Density Residential 0-5 units per acre), MD (Medium Density Residential 5-12 units per acre), CC (Commercial Core) and OS (Open Space); * text change to the Commercial Core definition in the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. * locational change of the future City collector street currently proposed along the west border of the Bloods Grove property. The subject property is approximately 93 acres and represents the balance of the Bloods Grove property after the recent annexation of the 17 acres of the mun£cipal fire station, park and Schoo! Site S. B A C K G R O U N D: With the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan in November, 1989, "advisory" land use designations were applied to all areas which were outside the City limits but within the City's Planning Area. The 110 acre Bloods Grove site was given advisory designations as follows: 40 acres Medium Density Residential, 39 acres Low Density Residential, 17 acres Community Facilities, 10 acres Commercial Core, and 4 acres Open Space. The 17 acres of Community Facilities was intended to accommodate a future elementary school site, neighborhood park, and fire station in the southwest portion of the City. On November 26, 1991 the City annexed 1.808 of the 110 acres, at the northeast corner of the property via Ordinance 76-91. The 1.808 acres consisted of an access easement as well as a temporary and permanent fire station site. The temporary fire station was placed on the site while the permanent fire station was constructed. Fire station # 5 has since been completed and the temporary station removed. In April, 1993, an annexation petition, land use plan amendment and initial zoning request to accomr~clate a 10 acre elementary school site on the Taheri property adjacent to Bloods Grove was submitted. Before those actions were formally prccessed, the School Board reconsidered that locatl-- and instead chose a 10 acre site in the northeast portion cf Bloods Groue. As a Dart of the School District's purchase con%tact the City is to locate a municipal park contiguous to the school site. P & Z Staff Rep¢ Future Land Use ..~p Amendment Page 2 In April, 1993 the owners of Bloods Grove granted agency to the City for the processing of an annexation petition and all land development applications necessary to accommodate a 10 acre elementary school (School Site S) and 6 acre municipal park. The change in land use from MD (Medium Density Residential) to CF (Community Facilities) was processed with Land Use Plan Amendment 93-2. The related annexation and initial zoning were approved by City Commission on March 22, 1994. The Conditional Use request to establish the school was approved by City Commission at its meeting of April 5, 1994. On April 8, 1994 the sale of the school site to Palm Beach County School Board and the park site to the City was consummated. A Land Use Map change for 93 acres (balance of Bloods Grove) from the County Land Use Map designation of MR-5 to the City LD (Low Density), MD (Medium Density), OS (Open Space), and CC (Commercial Core) is now before the Board. A concurrent annexation and initial zoning request are being processed and will be before the Board at a later meeting. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The land under consideration is the balance of the Bloods Grove commercial orange orchard operation. It is approximately 93 acres in area and is located south of Linton Boulevard, east of Military, west of the Foxe Chase (residential) Subdivision, and north of Del Aire Subdivision. The majority of the 93 acre site is an active orange grove with a packing and shipping operation. The development proposal represents the redistribution of existing advisory City land use designations. The proposed redistribution will move the 10 acre "Commercial Core" designation from the center of the site to the northeast corner of the site to cover the existing Bloods operation. The reason for this relocation of the commercial uses is that the Bloods will be maintaining ownership of the 10 acres and desire to continue the existing commercial operation. The 83 acre balance of the site is proposed for development under the current City Land Use designations. The development proposal includes 250 apartments, 175 attached units, 200 single family homes and a 4 acre open space (Hammock area) by the Levitt Corporation. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS: Current Land Use Desiqnations: The current County Land Use de~icnation for the site is ME-5 (Medium Re~identia!-5 units per acre). The City's current advisory land use designaLicns for the site are as follows: 40 acres of ~D (Medium Density), 39 acres of LD (Low Density), 4 acres of OS (Open Space), and 10 acres of CC (Commercial Core). P & Z Staff Rep¢ Future Land Use ..dp Amendment Page 3 Requested Land Use Desiqnations: The requested Land Use changes are the same as the City Advisory Land Use designations in total acreage per category. However, a change in the location of the 10 acre commercial core component from its current position internal to the site to one which has frontage along Llnton Boulevard is proposed. Adjacent Land Use MaD Designations & Land Use: FLUM Desiqnations: City County Subject property: Low Res (1-5 du) MR-5 Res Med Density (5-12 du) Commercial Core Open Space Adjacent properties: North Low Density & CF N/A East Low Res (1-5 du) LR-1 Res South Low Res (1-5 du) & OS N/A West Transitional MR-5 Res Actual Land Use: Subject property: Commercial orange grove Adjacent properties: North Shadywoods (residential) East Foxe Chase (residential) Subdivision, fire station #5,school site S, and future park site South Del Air subdivision and Del Aire golf course West South County Professional Office center, South County Mental Health Facility, and La Casa subdivision. Allowable Land Uses: Under the proposed residential FLUM designations (Low Density and Medium Density) residential zoning districts which accommodate single family to multi- family units are allowed. Under the Open Space FLUM. designations the OS and CF zoning designations allow open spaces and facilities which serve public and semi public uses. The proposed Commercial Core FLUM. is consisten~ with RY. (Residential Medium) ,CBD (Central Business Dis~r=c~-~. , RT (Resort (Residential Office) , CF ', Corer. unity Facilities ~. , OS (Open Space), and SAD (Special Activities District) . The applican% has requested initial zoning des ignations of PRD ( Planned Residential Development) and SAD (Special Activity District). These zoning designations are consistent with the proposed land uses. P & Z Staff Rep¢ Future Land Use ..-,p Amendment Page 4 Service and Concurrency Implicat.ions: In the preparation of the Delray Beach Comprehensive Plan, the land use designations throughout the entire planning and service area were considered in the overall land use pattern, assessment of level of service, the provision of services, and meeting remaining land use needs. The proposed land use designations are the same as those previously considered. Thus, the act of officially adopting the City's "Advisory" Land Use designations has no impact with respect to general notions of service delivery and concurrency. However, as the FLUM change is technically from MR-5 (County) to the City Advisory designations of LD,MD,OS,and CC the difference in intensity with respect to traffic impact must be assessed. The maximum development potential under the current MR-5 FLUM designation would be 465 single family units generating 4,650 dally trips. The maximum development potential under the City's advisory land use designations of LD, MD OP, and CC wi1! be 200 single family, 468 multi-family, and 108,900 sq.ft, of commercial use generating a total of 8,496 daily trips. The difference is an additional 3,846 daily trips. A traffic study was submitted and Llnton Boulevard meets traffic concurrency. Military Trail is noted as currently failing traffic concurrency from Atlantic Avenue south to Clint Moore Road. Military Trail will require 6 laning prior to development under the existing Land Use Designation. The proposed FLUM amendment will not increase the traffic volumes to a level which would require additional improvements over and above the 6 laning already required. While Linton Boulevard passed traffic concurrency the portion between Military Trail east to Waterford Place required analysis under a more detailed test (alternative Test 1). One portion of the roadway, the intersection of Linton Boulevard and 1-95, did not pass the alternative test. An additional analysis was undertaken for this intersection which estimated a reduced impact based upon traffic diversion with the opening of the Congress Avenue/I-95 interchange. When the resulting reduced traffic volumes were utilized the Linton Boulevard and 1-95 intersection also passed the alternative test. The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic study and has tentatively accepted the conclusions within that report. Prior to the apprcva! of any development on the site, improvements to the traffic sysuem which accommodates that development must be in place or programmed. P & Z Staff Rep¢ Future Land Use ..=p Amendment Page 5 Land Use Compatibility: The proposed distribution of the residential land use designations maximizes compatibility with adjacent land use designations. The LD (Low Density _ residential) is proposed along the south and west borders adjacent the Low Density land use designations of Foxe Chase to the east and Del Aire to the south. The majority of the MD (Medium Density Residential) Land Use designation is proposed -- along Linton Boulevard and adjacent to the "Transitional" land use designations which border the site to the west. The "Commercial Core" component which is noted internal to the site -- in the existing City advisory designations is proposed for relocation to Linton Boulevard. The applicant has indicated the relocation of the commercial component is to accommodate the existing Bloods packing house and to establish up to an additional 50,000 sq.ft, of commercial uses. The additional uses are primarily intended to serve the neighborhood and local residents. Compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood can -- be enhanced through the provision of pedestrian and bicycle access, and landscape buffers. While the residential Land Use designations are compatible with the adjacent and surrounding land use designations this compatibility does not relate to any specific development -- proposals. The proposed zoning classification of PRD and SAD require the concurrent processing of site development plans. The findings related to the PRD are extensive and address -- compatibility issues. The SAD requires approval of a specific list of uses, which can only be modified by amending the SAD ordinance. With the processing of the PRD and SAD plans, _ compatibility with respect to the intensity of the commercial uses, the size of lots and residential structures, landscape buffers, etc will be addressed in detail. Commercial Core Desiqnation: Although the commercial is no longer completely interior to the site, the applicant has proposed to retain the Commercial Core designation and its original intent through the modification of the Commercial Core text within the Future Land Use Element of the Ccmprehensive Plan. The following underlined changes to the Commercial Core definition in the Comprehensive Plan are proposed: P & Z Staff Rep¢ Future Land Use ..~p Amendment Page 6 Commercial Core: This designation is applied to the Community's downtown areas. It can also be applied to a commercial component of a planned residential development~ when that component is internally oriented~ with no direct access to an arterial roadway. The Commercial Core designation includes the "Village Center" development scenario described in the Future Land Use Element and graphically shown in Figure L-8. It accommodates a variety of uses including commercial and office development; residential land use upper story apartments;older homes renovated to accommodate office use; and uses such as "bed and breakfast" establish; and industrial/commerce uses as proposed in the "Village Center" development scenario, and in the Blood's Grove commercial component. While this modification to the language in the land use plan can be accommodated, it may be best to change the proposed land use designation itself. With the relocation of the commercial component to the perimeter of the site and the inclusion of the Bloods operation, it might be best to seek an alternative designation that will ensure that the commercial uses are neighborhood oriented. An alternative to changing the language in the plan and placing the Commercial Core designation on the current Bloods operation is to apply a "Transitional" land use designation to the 10 acre parcel. An SAD zoning could then be applied which would incorporate the Bloods operation, as well as office and commercial uses that are less intense than those permitted with a Commercial Core designation. Implementation and Direction of the Comprehensive Plan: Parks and Recreation: There are a few policies contained within the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan which give direction with respect to providing specific facilities within the southwest area of the City. The ANALYSIS portion of the Open Space and Recreation Element identifies the need to locate a park in the southwest quadrant of the City. It specifically states that "the siting of a neighborhood park, similar to Barwick Park but with a softball field and all purpose field is needed for adequate service". Concurrency with respect to the park and recreation element is met in the southwest portion of the City through recent acquisition of the southwest park and provision of a ball field and two (2) ali-purpose fields with development of the southwest park and elementary school. Cit}-wide concurrency is being met through u~nverslon cf existing facilities to ail-purpose fields, and provision of recreational facilities in new parks and schools. P & Z Staff Rep¢ Future Land Use ..~p Amendment Page 7 The following improvements have occurred since the last update of the Parks and Recreation Element: -- * Construction of Barwick Middle School with 4 tennis courts, 4 basketball courts, softball, 1 baseball, and -- one soccer field. * Construction of Banyon Creek Elementary School with 2 basketball courts, 1 softball field, 1 volleyball court. * Improvements to Atlantic High School (lighting) 2 -- baseball diamonds and playing field. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION~ City Collector Aliqnment: The proposed FLUM change includes a change in the location of a proposed City Collector. The current street is shown on the Future Land Use Map along the west property line and through the middle of the adjacent Holland property. The proposed location is the central spine road aligned with Palm Forest Way (Shadywoods), proceeds south to about the center of the site, and then west through the Taheri property. The portion of the spine road which is continued south through the Bloods site and west to Military Trail is proposed as a private gated roadway and is not part of the City collector system. The relocation has no negative effects on surrounding properties. The relocation substantially improves the ability to develop the Holland property northwest of the site, as the current proposed roadway location dissects the parcel. Germantown Roadway Alignment: During the processing of the FLUM amendment for the school and park site a realignment of Germantown Road was proposed. The realignment extended Germantown Road west through the Bloods site and then north to Linton Boulevard at Palm Forest Way. A temporary access for the school and park was proposed from the western extension of Germantown Road north to intersect Linton Boulevard at right angles where Germantown currently meets Linton Boulevard. The temporary access was to be removed with development of the permanent alignment. The existing traffic light at the temporary access was then to be moved to the permanent alignment (Palm Forest way and Linton Boulevard). With the relocation of the commercial operation to Linton Boulevard the extension of Germantown Road to the proposed spine road (permanent alignment) is not provided. The reason for the elimination of the connection is to preserve the vegetation and ambience at the entrance to Blood's Grove operation. Under the current proposal the temporary access would become permanent and serve the school, park, and commercial core property. The projected spine road at Linton Boulevard and Palm Forest Way will provide access to future residential development within Bloods Grove and alternative access to the school, park and commercial area. P & Z Staff Rep, Future Land Use ..up Amendment Page 8 Information with respect to how the two intersections (temporary and permanent) would affect signalization along Llnton Boulevard was requested and has not been provided. Staff members of the County Traffic Division have stated that the minimum spacing between signals is 1000 feet. The two proposed intersections will be approximately 550 feet apart. The Traffic Division indicated the existing traffic light would stay at the Germantown / Linton intersection until the traffic volume at the spine road ( Palm Forest / Lint on intersection ) warrant signalization. At that point the existing light would most likely be relocated. The signal relocation would leave traffic from Germantown Road, the school site, park and Bloods commercial operation intersecting Linton Boulevard at a non signalized intersection. The original proposal and alignment would have all traffic intersecting Ltnton Boulevard at the signalized intersection at Llnton and Palm Forest. It is possible that the school/park intersection can be installed at a location that is east of the current proposal. The additional distance may provide adequate spacing to allow both intersections to be signalized. The location of the intersections and the prospects for signalization must be addressed with submission of the ~aster site plan for the development. REVIEW BY OTHERS: The land use amendment request is not in a geographic area requiring review by either the HPB (Historic Preservation Board ), DDA ( Downtown Development Authority ), or the CRA (Community Redevelopment Agency). Courtesy notices were sent to: * Palm Beach County Planning * City of Boca Raton * Helen Coopersmith (PROD) * Erminio P. Gulliano (Foxe Chase) * Saul Weinburger, (Del Aire ) * Jim Goggin (Country Lake Association) * Shad~woods Homeowners Association. * Spanish Wells Condo Association * Gretchen Bacon, Oakmont Residential Assoc. ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSIONS: The proposed FLUM amendment generates several concerns relating to the relocation of the commercial uses which are summarized in the following paragraphs. These include: P & Z Staff Rep¢ Future Land Use ..ap Amendment Page 9 Commercial Core= The original intent of the Commercial Core designation was to primarily serve the commercial needs of the surrounding subdivision. The proposed relocation and accommodation of the existing Bloods operation differs in some respects from the intent of the Commercial Core. An alternative to applying a "Commercial Core" designation is to -- apply a Transitional land use. The current and proposed uses are consistent with uses allowed under those zoning designations allowed under the Transitional land use designation. This -- alternative would provide some limitations on the level and intensity of future uses. Alignment of Germantown Road= With the negotiations of the school site and park site the -- extension of Germantown Road was proposed. The applicant agreed to this alignment at that time. With the relocation of the commercial component the applicant has proposed elimination of'a -- portion of the alignment to maintain the ambience of the existing entry. The elimination of the extension may negatively effect signalization of related intersections with Linton _ Boulevard. This issue must be resolved with the processing of the master site plan and development activity of the school site. The next steps in the development process will be annexation and initial zoning of the property. Each of the proposed zoning designations, PRD and SAD, also require concurrent submittal of _ master plans. Some of the issues identified in this report 'i.e. Germantown Road alignment; and compatibility of site specific plans with adjacent existing land use ty~es are to be resolved at these stages. A L T E R N A T I V E S: -- A. Continue with direction. B. Recommend approval of the FLUM designation change from County MR-5 to City LD (Low Density), CC (Cor_~ercial Core), OS (Open Space); language changes to the Commercial Core; and relocation of the City's collector rcadway subject to -- conditions; C. Recommend approval of the FLUM.. designatis~n change from -- County MR-5 to City LD (Low Density), ~ ~:.,.=~um Density), Transitional, and OS (Open Space); rec enl nc chan~e tc the text of Commercial Core; and reloca%icn of the City's collectOr roadway subject to conditions; P & Z Staff Repc Future Land Use ..ap Amendment Page 10 D. Recommend denial of the FLUM designation changes based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to compatibility (location of commercial component). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: By motion: Recommend approval of the FLUM designation change from County MR-5 to City LD (Low Density), MD (Medium Density), Transitional, and OS (Open Space); recommend no change to the text of Commercial Core; and relocation of the City's collector roadway, based upon a finding that the proposed land use classifications are consistent with those that were previously approved with the adoption of the City's advisory land use classifications for unincorporated areas; and that the intensity of the commercial uses and compatibility with adjacent properties can be further addressed through the processing of a Master Site and Development Plan and the adoption of a Special Activities District. LIN TON BOULEVARD -- .~L~ .: ~-'~7. _ - CITY LIMITS- I--' BLOOD'S GROVE ' ' S. County Mental Health ~ :: Chur¢~ .Medium Density. Residential ~[D-R) 40 acres Blood's Hammock Groves Low Densi~'ResidentJal(LD-R) 39acres Mar) Amendment c~ mmercial Core (CC) 10 acres Future Land Use ~Sth Schematic Roadway Net-.vork Open Space (OS) 4 acres TOTAL ~, ~ .:--- -= ~ -- ~3 a._cr~ PROPOSED LAND USE8 ~ .~ :~ ,,%, PLANNING & ZONING =iESIDENTJAL LAND USES INDUSTRIAL LAND USES COMMUNITY FACILITJE-$ '' T "'""~ ~1'7~ - LOW DENSITY 0-5 DU/A3, RE ~ - INDUSTRIAL PQ - PUBLIC BUIL~!NG$ ' © - ~ - COMN~,E.~CE R~;R~ATION & OPEN 0 - RurAL ~S~:ENT,AL ~ - OP~ AC~. ACTIVE ,~;::~ - T~ANS:T[C%AL ' , - ODEN S~ACE, PASSIVE H~ - MOSP~TAL-S ~ TRANS~T'ONAL .~ - RECRE~N ~ - GENERAL COMMERCIAL ~ - SUBJECT TO_C~NSERVATION POLICY B:122 REDEVELOPMENT EXISTING LAND USES :, ~ ~ ~_ '~ ~ { / ~C~CSED PA'.,~VENT .' :U~ ~G~T CF WAY CITY of DELRAY BEACH II ~mo~~ s~c~s ~P~~~ll school s~ ~' ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~a ~ ][ ACCE~ RO~ MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # /0~ - MEETING OF MAY 3, 1994 TRANSMITTAL OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1 DATE: APRIL 29, 1994 This item is before the Commission to authorize transmittal of proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1 to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for review. The staff report, together with a copy of Plan Amendment 94-1, is attached for your review. Please note that the Land Use Plan Amendment for Blood's Groves is part of Plan Amendment 94-1. In view of the applicant's request for continuance to May 17, 1994, it is appropriate that the transmittal hearing likewise be continued to that date. ref:agmemo24 CITY COMMISSION DOCUMENTATION TO: David T. Harden, City Manager FROM: //Diane Dominguez, Director of Planning and Zoning SUBJECT: MEETING OF MAY 3, 1994 TRANSMITTAL OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1 ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION: The action requested of the Commission is that of authorizinq transmittal of proposed Plan Amendment 94-1 to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for State review. BACKGROUND: The Planning and Zoning Board formally considered the proposed amendment at a public hearing APril 18, 1994. During the public hearing for the overall Plan Amendment, no public testimony was received. The Board recommended that the Commission approve transmittal of the proposed Plan Amendment, containing the material in the staff report and its attachments, with changes related to Blood's Grove. Changes are detailed in Support Document #5 (Blood's Grove). On April 26, 1994, representatives of Blood's Grove met with staff to request a continuance of the land use plan amendment. For Blood's Grove to remain a part of Plan Amendment 94-1, granting of such a request also necessitates a continuance of the transmittal hearing for the Plan Amendment. The attachment, Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1, includes Table IV-3, the Five Year Schedule of Improvements and Support Document #5 (Blood's Grove). RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, authorize transmittal of proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1, containing the material in the staff report and attachments, to the Department of Community Affairs for the required State review. Attachments: * P&Z staff report of April 18, 1994 * Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1 T:\advanced\CC94-1 PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT MEETING OF: April 18, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: V D. RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COMMISSION REGARDING TRANSMITTAL OF PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1 ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD: The item before the Board is that of recommending to the City Commission those items that should be transmitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs as part of Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1. BACKGROUND: The City Commission initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1 on February 22, 1994. In the initiation motion, all of the Planning and Zoning Board's recommendations were approved. During the processing of the Plan Amendment, the following items were deleted from the initiated document: * Addition of Public Facilities Policy B-2.6 calling for the City to explore Reverse Osmosis treatment of water from the Floridan Aquifer as a supplement to the water supply. The Director of Environmental Services determined that the City is still several years away from addressing this option. * Land Use Plan amendment for the Spence Property was withdrawn. The current draft of the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is included as an attachment. Table IV-3, the Five Year Schedule of Improvements, will be based on the CIP with the following di f ferences: * Table IV-3 will include only the expenditure side of funds; * Table IV-3 will include only projects over $100,000. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, recommend that the City Commission transmit to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1, containing the material in the staff report and attachment. Attachment:Proposed Plan Amendment 94-1 Draft CIP ? Reviewed by: Diane Dominguez T: \advanced\9 4-1PZ. DOC MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER ~,i~/) SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # /O A - MEETING OF MAY 3, 1994 FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENT FROM COUNTY MR-5 TO CITY FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS OF LD (LOW DENSITY), MD (MEDIUM DENSITY), CC (COMMERCIAL CORE), AND OS (OPEN SPACE) FOR BLOOD' S HAMMOCK GROVES DATE: APRIL 29, 1994 We have received a request from the applicant for a continuance of this item to the May 17, 1994, meeting. Because it had already been advertised per statutory requirement, the Amendment must appear on the Commission's agenda. If the continuance is approved, it should be publicly stated at the May 3rd meeting that the matter will be continued to the date certain of May 17, 1994. Attached for your review is the staff report concerning the referenced item. Recommend consideration of the request for continuance. ref:agmemo23 SIEMON, LARSEN & MARSH Mizner Pa~ 433 Plaza Real, Suite 339 Boca Rain, Florida 33432 ~arbom Station ~ie~one (~7) 368-3808 Su~ 350 47 W~ Po~ Street F~a~ile ~0~ 368-4~8 19800 M~Arth~ ~ulev~d Chicco, []~o~ 60605 ~e, C~ffomia 92715 (312) 939-7117 April 2 6, ~9 9 4 (714) 752-1538 city Manager 100 NW 1st Avenue ~ -~ Delray Beach, Florida 33444 RE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Blood's Hammock Groves Dear Mr. Harden: Over the past week, we have worked to respond to the issues raised by the public and the Planning & Zoning Board at the public hearing held April 18th. We believe that we can more fully respond to the concerns of the Planning & Zoning Board and Staff. We understand that notice of the public hearing has already been provided, and that we will therefore be obligated to appear on May 3, 1994. We are asking for a continuance until May 17th, but the Commission will not decide whether to continue the hearing until May 3. We will be prepared to move forward on May 3, 1994, if the Commission does not agree to have a continuance, but most of the additional material would not be available for staff and Commission review in advance. We appreciate your assistance with this matter. If you have any additional questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Lee D. Einsweiler, AICP Senior Planner Authorized Representative Norman Blood/Levitt Homes, Inc. vbs:LDE cc: Susan Ruby Alison Hardee Diane Dominguez CITY COMMISSION DOCUMENTATION TO: DAVID T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER THRU: DI N DEP~F~ ~TMENT F PI.~NNING AN'D ZONING FROM: PAUL DORLING, P~NClPAL PLANNER * NOTE: APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED A CONTINUANCE OF THIS ITEM TO THE MAY 17 MEETING. SUBJECT: MEETING OF MAY 3, 1994 FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENT FROM COUNTY MR-5 TO CITY LAND USE DESIGNATIONS OF LD (LOW DENSITY)~ MD (MEDIUM DENSITY), CC (COMMERCIAL CORE) ~ AND OS (OPEN SPACE) , FOR THE BLOODS GROVE PROPERTY. ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION: The action requested of the City Commission is that of transmittal of a Future Land Use Plan Map amendment and Comprehensive Plan text amendment which includes the · following components: * A Future Land Use Map change from County MR-5 (Medium Residential-5 units per acre) to City Land Use designations of LD (Low Density - 39 acres), MD (Medium Density - 40 acres), CC (Commercial Core - 10 acres) and OS (Open Space - 4 acres) for Bloods Grove. * Text change to the commercial core definition in the Future Land Use Map element of the Comprehensive Plan * Locational change of the future city collector street currently proposed along the west border of the Bloods Grove property. The 93 acre property is being processed as a part of Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1. The property is located on the south side of Linton Boulevard east of Military Trail. BACKGROUND: With the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan in November, 1989, "advisory" land use designations were applied to all areas which were outside the City limits but within the City's Planning Area. The 110 acre Bloods Grove site was given advisory designations as follows: 40 acres Medium Density Residential, 39 acres Low Density Residential, 17 acres Community Facilities, 10 acres Commercial Core, and 4 acres Open Space. The 17 acres of Community Facilities have been annexed for a municipal fire station, park and School Site S. The 93 acre balance is the subject of this request. Bloods Land Use Amendment City Commission May 3, 1994 Page 2 Separate petitions have been submitted and are currently being processed for the annexation of the property into the City limits and for initial zoning designations of PRD-Planned Residential Development (83 acres) and SAD-Special Activities District (10 acres). The PRD and SAD zoning districts require submittal of a master development plan and site plan, respectively. Once those plans have been submitted the requests will be reviewed and scheduled for Planning and Zoning Board and City Commission action. ANALYSIS: The proposed amendment will adopt the City's existing advisory designations with the exception of the location of the 10 acres of Commercial Core. This 10 acres is to be relocated from the center of the site to the area occupied by the existing Bloods commercial operation (northeast corner of the site along Linton Boulevard). The Bloods will be maintaining ownership of the 10 acres and desire to continue and expand on the existing fruit packing and retail operation. The amendment also proposes text changes to the Commercial Core definition which would limit the type of commercial uses allowed within Commercial Core. The Low Density (0-5 units per acre) is proposed along the east and south borders adjacent to the Foxe Chase and Del Aire subdivisions; the Medium Density (5-12 units per acre) is proposed adjacent to the commercial and office uses to the west as well as along Military Trail; and the Open Space accommodates an existing Hammock area. The amendment also includes the relocation of the proposed city collector road currently cited along the west property line of Bloods Grove. Concerns were noted regarding two aspects of the applicant's proposal. These involve impacts created by moving the commercial component closer to Linton, which would attract more outside traffic, and the proposal to eliminate a connecting road between Germantown Road and the new collector road. To mitigate the impacts of the relocation of the commercial component, staff recommended a designation of Transitional, as opposed to Commercial Core. This would have the effect of limiting the intensity of allowable non-residential uses. Regarding the road connection, staff notes that it is a concern which requires additional analysis. It may be necessary to require an alternative site plan for the Bloods property which would provide the road in the event that it is deemed to be necessary. The attached Planning and Zoning staff report describes the issues in greater detail. Bloods Land Use Amendment City Commission May 3, 1994 Page 3 A traffic study has been submitted and its conclusions accepted by the Palm Beach Traffic Division. The study emphasizes that Military Trail which currently fails level of service D, will require widening from 4 to 6 lanes under the current, as well as the proposed Land Use designations. The study further notes that at different phases of development improvements to the intersection of Military Trail and Clint Moore Road and the widening of Military Trail (4 lanes to 6 lanes) from Atlantic Avenue south to Clint Moore Road will be required. With these improvements traffic concurrency will be met. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION: The Planning and Zoning Board reviewed the Future land Use Amendment at the April 18, 1994 regular meeting. Eleven people spoke in opposition at the public hearing. They included representatives from adjacent homeowner associations ( Foxe Chase, Del Ida, Bel Aire) who opposed the amendment citing increase density (lack of compatibility) and increased traffic'. Several Board members expressed concern with the increase in density, increased traffic, and the relocation of the commercial core component. After a lengthy public discussion the Board recommended the Commercial Core designation be changed to Transitional, and that it remain in the current location (central to the site). The Board also included a restriction that the interior commercial component not be allowed to develop until Blood's packing and retail operation is discontinued. The Board further recommended that the amount of acreage allocated to MD (Medium Density) be reduced so that the land use designations are as follows (see attached exhibit): * 63 acres of Low Density * 16 acres Medium Density * 10 acres Transitional * 4 acres Open Space The applicants request would have allowed a maximum of 480 multi-family and single family attached units and 195 single family detached units for a total of (675 units). The applicant intention is to construct 250 multi-family units, 175 attached single family units, and 200 single family detached units for a total of 625 units. Under the Planning and Zoning Board's recommendation a total of 507 units (192 multi-family units and 315 single family units) could be built. It is noted that a minimum of 21 acres of Medium Density residential would be required to build the proposed 250 unit multi-family development indicated in the conceptual master plan. The Planning and Zoning Board recommendation regarding the Commercial Core leaves the Bloods operation in an uncertain status. It would only be allowed to continue until the interior commercial component is developed. This differs significantly from the Blood's proposal, which is to augment the existing operation with compatible retail and office uses in a market-like setting. Bloods Land Use Amendment City Commission May 3, 1994 Page 4 ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: A. Continue with direction. B. By motion, based upon a finding that the proposed land use classifications are consistent with those that were previously approved with the adoption of the City's advisory land use classifications for unincorporated areas; and that the intensity of the commercial uses and compatibility with adjacent properties can be further addressed through the processing of a Master Site and Development Plan and the adoption of a Special Activities District, transmit the proposed amendment as part of Plan Amendment 94-1 (select one option): 1. ADDlicants proDosal: A change from County MR-5 to City designations of 39 acres LD (Low Density), 40 acres of MD (Medium Density), 10 acres CC (Commercial Core) along Linton Boulevard, 4 acres of OS (Open Space); language changes to the Commercial Core; and relocation of the City's collector roadway; or 2. Staff recommendation to P&Z: A change from County MR-5 to City designations of 39 acres LD (Low Density), 40 acres MD (Medium Density), 10 acres of Transitional along Linton Boulevard, and 4 acres OS (Open Space); recommend no change to the text of Commercial Core; and relocation of the City's collector roadway; or 3. Planninq and Zoninq Board recommendation: A change from County MR-5 to City designations of 63 acres of LD (Low Density), 16 acres MD (Medium Density), 10 acres Transitional in the center of the site and 4 acres of OS (Open Space); recommend no changes to the text of Commercial Core; and relocation of the City's collector roadway; C. Deny the FLUM designation changes based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to compatibility . Bloods Land Use Amendment City Commission May 3, 1994 Page 5 RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, based upon a finding that the proposed land use classifications are consistent with those that were previously approved with the adoption of the City's advisory land use classifications for unincorporated areas; and that the intensity of the commercial uses and. compatibility with adjacent properties can be further addressed through the processing of a Master Site and Development Plan and the adoption of a Special Activities District, transmit the proposed amendment as part of Plan Amendment 94-1 for a change from County MR-5 to City designations of 39 acres LD (Low Density), 40 acres MD (Medium Density), 10 acres of Transitional along Linton Boulevard, and 4 acres OS (Open Space); recommend no change to the text of Commercial Core; and relocation of the City's collector roadway. Attachment: * Planning and Zoning Board report of April 18, 1994 * P&Z recommendation Land Use Map a:bloccdoc.doc LIN T ON BOULEVARD CANAL L-56 ~,~,.~'"'1 (UHCLE DAN'S k,.9.~'~ NURSERY) MD-R s°~ c°uN~ ME~ H~L~ - SO~ COOH~ ~AHERI PROPERS) ~-R LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---S'iAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: April 18, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: V.C. ITEM: Future Land Use Map Amendment Changing the FLUM Designation from County MR-5 to the Following City Designations: OS, LDR, MDR & CC; for Blood's Hammock Groves GENERAL DATA: P=o~r~y Size ............ 93 acre. ~. Ci[y ~nd Uae P~ ....... ~ ~niity ~.ldiatial, N~I~ ~ui[y Reliden[ial C~rclal Core, ~n S~ce Coun[y ~nd Use Plan ..... ~-S (Eesiden[tal, up ~[. ~= acre) existing Cl~y advlso~ designations. ~velo~nt) (~l~tple F~ly Residential last: ~ (Residential ~ra~ltlonal South: ~ ~ ~-1-~ (8ingle F~ly Res ldenttal ) Nest: A, CF~ ~ (Pla~ Ofilce ~/SE (Single F~lly Residential - P~) ~xistL~ ~fld ~8e ........ A ~Lon of an existing orenge grove and facility. Prop~s~ ~nd ~ses ....... 10 ac~e orange ~oc~lA~y and assoc~at~ retell use vl~h future neLg~rh~ c~ercLal uses, 21 acres of ~ltL-f~Lly (250 mingle f~ily detach~ (175 units) a~ attach~ (200 units), with a 4 acre h~k prese~e area. ~ater Se~ice ............ [xlstlnq 12" eater Old ~nt~ Road right-of- -,,. ,0. in Llnton ~uleva~. 11" rater mtn in NilitaU Trail. Se~er Se~ice ............ [~lstl~ ~' s~er aln se~lng tire V.C. ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD: The item before the Board is that of making a recommendation on a privately initiated Future Land Use Map Amendment and Comprehensive Plan text amendment which includes the following components: * changing the land use designation from County MR-5 (Medium Density Residential- 5 units per acre) to a combination of City LD (Low Density Residential 0-5 units per acre), MD (Medium Density Residential 5-12 units per acre), CC (Commercial Core) and OS (Open Space); * text change to the Commercial Core definition in the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. * locational change of the future City collector street currently proposed along the west border of the Bloods Grove property. The subject property is approximately 93 acres and represents the balance of the Bloods Grove property after the recent annexation of the 17 acres of the municipal fire station, park and School Site S. BACKGROUND: With the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan in November, 1989, "advisor~" land use designations were applied to all areas which were outside the City limits but within the City's Planning Area. The 110 acre Bloods Grove site was given advisory designations as follows: 40 acres Medium Density Residential, 39 acres Low Density Residential, 17 acres Community Facilities, 10 acres Commercial Core, and 4 acres Open Space. The 17 acres of Community Facilities was intended to accommodate a future elementary school site, neighborhood park, and fire station in the southwest portion of the City. On November 26, 1991 the City annexed 1.808 of the 110 acres, at the northeast corner of the property via Ordinance 76-91. The 1.808 acres consisted of an access easement as well as a temporary and permanent fire station site. The temporary fire station was placed on the site while the permanent fire station was constructed. Fire station # 5 has since been completed and the temporary station removed. In April, 1993, an annexation petition, land use plan amendment and initial zoning request to accommodate a 10 acre elementary school site on the Taheri property adjacent to Bloods Grove was submitted. Before those actions were formally processed, the School Board reconsidered that location and instead chose a 10 acre site in the northeast portion of Bloods Grove. As a part of the School District's purchase contract the City is to locate a municipal park contiguous to the school site. P & Z Staff Rep¢ Future Land Use ..ap Amendment Page 2 In April, 1993 the owners of Bloods Grove granted agency to the City for the processing of an annexation petition and all land development applications necessary to accommodate a 10 acre elementary school (School Site S) and 6 acre municipal park. The change in land use from MD (Medium Density Residential) to CF (Community Facilities) was processed with Land Use Plan Amendment 93-2. The related annexation and initial zoning were approved by City Commission on March 22, 1994. The Conditional Use request to establish the school was approved by City Commission at its meeting of April 5, 1994. On April 8, 1994 the sale of the school site to Palm Beach County School Board and the park site to the City was consummated. A Land Use Map change for 93 acres (balance of Bloods Grove) from the County Land Use Map designation of MR-5 to the City LD (Low Density), MD (Medium Density), OS (Open Space), and CC (Commercial Core) is now before the Board. A concurrent annexation and initial zoning request are being processed and will be before the Board at a later meeting. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The land under consideration is the balance of the Bloods Grove commercial orange orchard operation. It is approximately 93 acres in area and is located south of Linton Boulevard, east of Military, west of the Foxe Chase (residential) Subdivision, and north of Del Aire Subdivision. The majority of the 93 acre site is an active orange grove with a packing and shipping operation. The development proposal represents the redistribution of existing advisory City land use designations. The proposed redistribution will move the 10 acre "Commercial Core" designation from the center of the site to the northeast corner of the site to cover the existing Bloods operation. The reason for this relocation of the commercial uses is that the Bloods will be maintaining ownership of the 10 acres and desire to continue the existing commercial operation. The 83 acre balance of the site is proposed for development under the current City Land Use designations. The development proposal includes 250 apartments, 175 attached units, 200 single family homes and a 4 acre open space (Hammock area) by the Levitt Corporation. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS: Current Land Use Designations: The current County Land Use designation for the site is MR-5 (Medium Residential-5 units per acre). The City's current advisory land use designations for the site are as follows: 40 acres of MD (Medium Density), 39 acres of LD (Low Density), 4 acres of OS (Open Space), and 10 acres of CC (Commercial Core). P & Z Staff Rep¢ Future Land Use ..ap Amendment Page 3 Requested Land Use Destqnations: The requested Land Use changes are the same as the City Advisory Land Use designations in total acreage per category. However, a change in the location of the 10 acre commercial core component from its current position internal to the site to one which has frontage along Linton Boulevard is proposed. Adjacent Land Use Map Designat~ons & Land Use: FLUM Des~gnat~ons~ City County Subject property: Low Res (1-5 du) MR-5 Res Med Density (5-12 du) Commercial Core Open Space Adjacent properties: North Low Density & CF N/A East Low Res (1-5 du) LR-1 Res South Low Res (1-5 du) & OS N/A West Transitional MR-5 Res Actual Land Use: Subject property: Commercial orange grove Adjacent properties: North Shadywoods (residential) East Foxe Chase (residential) Subdivision,fire station %5,school site S, and future park site South Del Air subdivision and Del Aire golf course West South County Professional Office center, South County Mental Health Facility, and La Casa subdivision. Allowable Land Uses: Under the proposed residential FLUM designations (Low Density and Medium Density) residential zoning districts which accommodate single family to multi- family units are allowed. Under the Open Space FLUM designations the OS and CF zoning designations allow open spaces and facilities which serve public and semi public uses. The proposed Commercial Core FLUM is consistent with RM (Residential Medium),CBD (Central Business District), RT (Resort Tourism), RO (Residential Office), CF (Community Facilities), OS (Open Space), and SAD (Special Activities District). The applicant has requested initial zoning designations of PRD (Planned Residential Development) and SAD (Special Activity District). These zoning designations are consistent with the proposed land uses. P & Z Staff Rep¢ Future Land Use ..~p Amendment Page 4 Service and Concurrency Implications: In the preparation of the Delray Beach Comprehensive Plan, the land use designations throughout the entire planning and service area were considered in the overall land use pattern, assessment of level of service, the provision of services, and meeting remaining land use needs. The proposed land use designations are the same as those previously considered. Thus, the act of officially adopting the City's "Advisory" Land Use designations has no impact with respect to general notions of service delivery and concurrency. However, as the FLUM change is technically from MR-5 (County) to the City Advisory designations of LD,MD,OS,and CC the difference in intensity with respect to traffic impact must be assessed. The maximum development potential under the current MR-5 FLUM designation would be 465 single family units generating 4,650 daily trips. The maximum development potential under the City's advisory land use designations of LD, MD OP, and CC will be 200 single family, 468 multi-family, and 108,900 sq.ft, of commercial use generating a total of 8,496 daily trips. The difference is an additional 3,846 daily trips. A traffic study was submitted and Linton Boulevard meets traffic concurrency. Military Trail is noted as currently failing traffic concurrency from Atlantic Avenue south to Clint Moore Road. Military Trail will require 6 laning prior to development under the existing Land Use Designation. The proposed FLUM amendment will not increase the traffic volumes to a level which would require additional improvements over and above the 6 laning already required. While Linton Boulevard passed traffic concurrency the portion between Military Trail east to Waterford Place required analysis under a more detailed test (alternative Test 1). One portion of the roadway, the intersection of Linton Boulevard and 1-95, did not pass the alternative test. An additional analysis was undertaken for this intersection which estimated a reduced impact based upon traffic diversion with the opening of the Congress Avenue/I-95 interchange. When the resulting reduced traffic volumes were utilized the Linton Boulevard and 1-95 intersection also passed the alternative test. The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic study and has tentatively accepted the conclusions within that report. Prior to the approval of any development on the site, improvements to the traffic system which accommodates that development must be in place or programmed. P & Z Staff Rep¢ Future Land Use ._~p Amendment Page 5 Land Use Compatibility: The proposed distribution of the residential land use designations maximizes compatibility with adjacent land use designations. The LD (Low Density residential) is proposed along the south and west borders adjacent the Low Density land use designations of Foxe Chase to the east and Del Alre to the south. The majority of the MD (Medium Density Residential) Land Use designation is proposed along Linton Boulevard and adjacent to the "Transitional" land use designations which border the site to the west. The "Commercial Core" component which is noted internal to the site in the existing City advisory designations is proposed for relocation to Llnton Boulevard. The applicant has indicated the relocation of the commercial component is to accommodate the existing Bloods packing house and to establish up to an additional 50,000 sq.ft, of commercial uses. The additional uses are primarily intended to serve the neighborhood and local residents. Compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood can be enhanced through the provision of pedestrian and bicycle access, and landscape buffers. While the residential Land Use designations are compatible with the adjacent and surrounding land use designations this compatibility does not relate to any specific development proposals. The proposed zoning classification of PRD and SAD require the concurrent processing of site development plans. The findings related to the PRD are extensive and address compatibility issues. The SAD requires approval of a specific list of uses, which can only be modified by amending the SAD ordinance. With the processing of the PRD and SAD plans, compatibility with respect to the intensity of the commercial uses, the size of lots and residential structures, landscape buffers, etc will be addressed in detail. Commercial Core Desiqnation: Although the commercial is no longer completely interior to the site, the applicant has proposed to retain the Commercial Core designation and its original intent through the modification of the Commercial Core text within the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The following underlined changes to the Commercial Core definition in the Comprehensive Plan are proposed: P & Z Staff Rep¢ Future Land Use .-=p Amendment Page 6 Commercial Core: This designation is applied to the Community's downtown areas. It can also be applied to a commercial component of a planned residential developmentt when that component is internally orientedt with no direct access to an arterial roadway. The Commercial Core designation includes the "Village Center" development scenario described in the Future Land Use Element and graphically shown in Figure L-8. It accommodates a variety of uses including commercial and office development; residential land use upper story apartments;older homes renovated to accommodate office use; and uses such as "bed and breakfast" establish; and industrial/commerce uses as proposed in the "Village Center" development scenario, and in the Blood's Grove commercial component. While this modification to the language in the land use plan can be accommodated, it may be best to change the proposed land use designation itself. With the relocation of the commercial component to the perimeter of the site and the inclusion of the Bloods operation, it might be best to seek an alternative designation that will ensure that the commercial uses are neighborhood oriented. An alternative to changing the language in the plan and placing the Commercial Core designation on the current Bloods operation is to apply a "Transitional" land use designation to the 10 acre parcel. An SAD zoning could then be applied which would incorporate the Bloods operation, as well as office and commercial uses that are less intense than those permitted with a Commercial Core designation. Implementation and Direction of the Comprehensive Plan: Parks and Recreation~ There are a few policies contained within the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan which give direction with respect to providing specific facilities within the southwest area of the City. The ANALYSIS portion of the Open Space and Recreation Element identifies the need to locate a park in the southwest quadrant of the City. It specifically states that "the siting of a neighborhood park, similar to Barwick Park but with a softball field and all purpose field is needed for adequate service". Concurrency with respect to the park and recreation element is met in the southwest portion of the City through recent acquisition of the southwest park and provision of a ball field and two (2) all-purpose fields with development of the southwest park and elementary school. Citywide concurrency is being met through conversion of existing facilities to all-purpose fields, and provision of recreational facilities in new parks and schools. P & Z Staff Rep¢ Future Land Use ..~p Amendment Page 7 The following improvements have occurred since the last update of the Parks and Recreation Element: * Construction of Barwick Middle School with 4 tennis courts, 4 basketball courts, softball, 1 baseball, and one soccer field. * Construction of Banyon Creek Elementary School with 2 basketball courts, 1 softball field, i volleyball court. * Improvements to Atlantic High School (lighting) 2 baseball diamonds and playing field. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION: City Collector Aliqnment: The proposed FLUM change includes a change in the location of a proposed City Collector. The current street is shown on the Future Land Use Map along the west property line and through the middle of the adjacent Holland property. The proposed location is the central spine road aligned with Palm Forest Way (Shadywoods), proceeds south to about the center of the site, and then west through the Taheri property. The portion of the spine road which is continued south through the Bloods site and west to Military Trail is proposed as a private gated roadway and is not part of the City collector system. The relocation has no negative effects on surrounding properties. The relocation substantially improves the ability to develop the Holland property northwest of the site, as the current proposed roadway location dissects the parcel. Germantown Roadway Alignment: During the processing of the FLUM amendment for the school and park site a realignment of Germantown Road was proposed. The realignment extended Germantown Road west through the Bloods site and then north to Linton Boulevard at Palm Forest Way. A temporary access for the school and park was proposed from the western extension of Germantown Road north to intersect Llnton Boulevard at right angles where Germantown currently meets Linton Boulevard. The temporary access was to be removed with development of the permanent alignment. The existing traffic light at the temporary access was then to be moved to the permanent alignment (Palm Forest way and Linton Boulevard). With the relocation of the commercial operation to Linton Boulevard the extension of Germantown Road to the proposed spine road (permanent alignment) is not provided. The reason for the elimination of the connection is to preserve the vegetation and ambience at the entrance to Blood's Grove operation. Under the current proposal the temporary access would become permanent and serve the school, park, and commercial core property. The projected spine road at Linton Boulevard and Palm Forest Way will provide access to future residential development within Bloods Grove and alternative access to the school, park and commercial area. P & Z Staff Rep~ Future Land Use ..up Amendment Page 8 Information with respect to how the two intersections (temporary and permanent) would affect signalization along Linton Boulevard was requested and has not been provided. Staff members of the County Traffic Division have stated that the minimum spacing between signals is 1000 feet. The two proposed intersections will be approximately 550 feet apart. The Traffic Division indicated the existing traffic light would stay at the Germantown / Linton intersection until the traffic volume at the spine road (Palm Forest / Linton intersection) warrant signalization. At that point the existing light would most likely be relocated. The signal relocation would leave traffic from Germantown Road, the school site, park and Bloods commercial operation intersecting Linton Boulevard at a non signalized intersection. The original proposal and alignment would have all traffic intersecting Linton Boulevard at the signalized intersection at Linton and Palm Forest. It is possible that the school/park intersection can be installed at a location that is east of the current proposal. The additional distance may provide adequate spacing to allow both intersections to be signalized. The location of the intersections and the prospects for signalization must be addressed with submission of the master site plan for the development. REVIEW BY OTHERS: The land use amendment request is not in a geographic area requiring review by either the HPB (Historic Preservation Board), DDA (Downtown Development Authority), or the CRA (Community Redevelopment Agency). Courtesy notices were sent to: * Palm Beach County Planning * City of Boca Raton * Helen Coopersmith (PROD) * Erminio P. Guiliano (Foxe Chase) * Saul Weinburger, (Del Aire ) * Jim Goggin (Country Lake Association) * Shadywoods Homeowners Association. * Spanish Wells Condo Association * Gretchen Bacon, Oakmont Residential Assoc. ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSIONS: The proposed FLUM amendment generates several concerns relating to the relocation of the commercial uses which are summarized in the following paragraphs. These include: P & Z Staff Repc Future Land Use ..~p Amendment Page 9 Commercial Corer The original intent of the Commercial Core designation was to primarily serve the commercial needs of the surrounding subdivision. The proposed relocation and accommodation of the existing Bloods operation differs in some respects from the intent of the Commercial Core. An alternative to applying a "Commercial Core" designation is to apply a Transitional land use. The current and proposed uses are consistent with uses allowed under those zoning designations allowed under the Transitional land use designation. This alternative would provide some limitations on the level and intensity of future uses. Alignment of Germantown Road: With the negotiations of the school site and park site the extension of Germantown Road was proposed. The applicant agreed to this alignment at that time. With the relocation of the commercial component the applicant has proposed elimination of--a'" portion of the alignment to maintain the ambience of the existing entry. The elimination of the extension may negatively effect signalization of related intersections with Linton Boulevard. This issue must be resolved with the processing of the master site plan and development activity of the school site. The next steps in the development process will be annexation and initial zoning of the property. Each of the proposed zoning designations, PR/) and SAD, also require concurrent submittal of master plans. Some of the issues identified in this report i.e. Germantown Road alignment; and compatibility of site specific plans with adjacent existing land use types are to be resolved at these stages. A L T E R N A T I V E S: A. Continue with direction. B. Recommend approval of the FLUM designation change from County MR-5 to City LD (Low Density), CC (Commercial Core), OS (Open Space); language changes to the Commercial Core; and relocation of the City's collector roadway subject to conditions; C. Recommend approval of the FLUM designation change from County MR-5 to City LD (Low Density), MD (Medium Density), Transitional, and OS (Open Space); recommend no change to the text of Commercial Core; and relocation of the City's collector roadway subject to conditions; P & Z Staff Rep¢ Future Land Use ..~p Amendment Page 10 D. Recommend denial of the FLUM designation changes based upon a failure to make positive findings with respect to compatibility (location of commercial component). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: By motion: Recommend approval of the FLUM designation change from County MR-5 to City LD (Low Density), MD (Medium Density), Transitional, and OS (Open Space); recommend no change to the text of Commercial Core; and relocation of the City's collector roadway, based upon a finding that the proposed land use classifications are consistent with those that were previously approved with the adoption of the City's advisory land use classifications for unincorporated areas; and that the intensity of the commercial uses and compatibility with adjacent properties can be further addressed through the processing of a Master Site and Development Plan and the adoption of a Special Activities District. ~ Court Holland Pmf, Pin,,'m Linton Onk~ (10 Square fl S. County Mental Health S. County vacant ........ Prof, ~ C~untry Lakes Tahert (3,5 ac.) Church MD-g 8~ DeF.,Nm Medium Density Residential (1VID-R) 40 acres Blood's Hammock Groves '~'~"...,'..-,.....,~.-.~ 39acres Future L~d Use Map ~endment Commercial Core (C~ I0 acr~ ~ Schematic Roadway Ne~ork ~en Space (O~ 4 ac~ TOT~ ~,~.~ ~ ~ ~c~ :," ~- ~ ' ~ -~ i PROPOSED LAND USES ~ ~ ,~ PLANNING & ZONING RESIDENTIAL LAND USES INDUSTRIAL LAND USES COMMUNITY FACILITIE~S~ I '' ~'~ ~"'~ Q -LOW DE.S,TY 0-~ ~ ' TRANSITIONAL R~ . - GENERAL COMMERCIAL ~ - SUBJECT TO CONSERVATION POLICY B%122 REDEVELOPMENT AREAS DESIGNATED EXISTING LAND USES PAL, I/ I ! / -~ ~ ~ / / / .... PROPOSE0 RIGHT OF WA~ .~ / ;~.'' / PROPOSED PAYMENT / ................ FU~RE RIGHT OF WAY FU~RE PA~UE~ CITY of DELRAY BEACH II E~IRO~E~AL SER~CES DEP~TME~~I[ SCHOOL S~E "fi' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Il ACCE~ RO~ £1T¥ I]F BELRI:I¥ BEACH OELRAY BEACH ~00 xi ¢,, T,,' ~,'/~ff,UE · ,)~_LR,~'r' 8EACH, FLORIDA 33444 · 407/243-7000 I~q~ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT $94-1 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF LAND USE The City Commission of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, will be considering Comprehensive Plan Amendment #94-1 to the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. Amendment 94-1 consists of amendments to the goals, objectives and policies of individual elements based upon assessment of tasks accomplished, availability of resources, and new information. It also includes a change to the Future Land Use Map. The subject matter of TEXT AMENDMENTS address: 1. Amendments related to the preservation of the Delray Oaks ecosite, describing the County's program to acquire the site and updating policies related to this subject, adding new 'policies to strengthen the Comprehensive Plan direction toward preservation of environmentally sensitive lands. 2. Amendments related to wastewater effluent reuse, describing the current program and updating policies related to this subject area. 3. Amendments related to the new water rate structure, describing the inverted block rate structure and updating policies related to this subject. 4. Other changes of a technical and clerical nature. 5. Updates to the status of a number of action policies. 6. Additional language in the Commercial Core Land Use Designation to accommodate the existing and future commercial uses in the Blood's Grove mixed use development. 7. Revisions to the Five Year Schedule of Improvements. THE EFFORT ALWAYS IV~ATTERS Pr:r~red on ~ecycted P~per The change to the FUTURE LAND USE MAP involves: * a 93 acre parcel of land located on the south side of Linton Boulevard, east of Military Trail as shown on the map in this advertisement. The Land Use Plan Designation change is FROM Medium Density Residential - 5 units per acre (County) TO Medium Density Residential- (5-12 units per acre) in part, (40 acres); Low Density Residential- (0-5 units per acre) in part, (39 acres); Commercial Core in part, (10 acres); and Open Space in part (4 acres). Note: The City has advisory land use designations on the site of Medium Density Residential, Low Density Residential, Commercial Core and Open Space. Map Insert The City Commission will conduct a Public Hearing regarding the above proposed amendments. The Public Hearing will be held on Tuesday, May 3, 1994, at 7:00 P.M., in the City Commission Chambers at City Hall, 100 N. W. 1st Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida. At this meeting the City Commission will accept public testimony and will consider the transmittal of Comprehensive Plan Amendment #94-1 to the State of Florida, Department of Community Affairs, for intergovernmental review and comment. Upon completion of that review, an additional advertised public hearing will be scheduled at which time the City Commission will consider adoption of Comprehensive Plan Amendment # 94-1. All interested citizens are invited to attend the public hearing and comment upon the Plan Amendment or submit their comments in writing to the Planning Department. Copies of the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are available at the Delray Beach Planning and Zoning Department, City Hall 100 N.W. 1st Avenue (Phone 243-7040), between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. on weekdays (excluding holidays). PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT IF A PERSON(S) DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE CITY COMMISSION WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING, SUCH PERSON(S) MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. THE CITY DOES NOT PROVIDE OR PREPARE SUCH RECORD PURSUANT TO F.S. 286.0105. PUBLISH: CITY OF DELRAY BEACH April 25, 1994 ALISON MACGREGOR HARTY CITY CLERK 3S¥H;3 3 X 0 ..-I ~ 'IIVNI I ~ AtiV.I. FIIIN Z~ NOTE: This is to be a one-quarter (1/4) page advertisement and the headline in the ad shall be in a type no smaller than 18 point. This ad is not to be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER ~l SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # ~ F - MEETING OF FEBRUARY 22. 1994 FQRMAL INITIATION OF CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1 DATE: FEBRUARY 18, 1994 This item is before the Commission to consider initiating Amendment 94-1 to the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. Pursuant to LDR Section 9.2.1, "A Plan Amendment shall only be initiated by formal action of the City Commission." This will be the first amendment for 1994. The amendment focuses on updating the work program in the Plan; updating the status of various objectives and policies; making corrections and general housekeeping; and addressing private petitions for land use plan amendments. The Planning and Zoning Board formally reviewed this item at a Special Meeting on February 14, 1994, and recommended that the City Commission initiate Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1 containing the material stated in the attached detailed staff report and the following additional items: a. Update Land Use Element Table L-1 (existing land use inventory). b. Correct the description of the Planning Area in the Land Use Element. c. Add Public Facilities Policy B-2.5 (Aquifer Storage & Recovery). d. Add Public Facilities Policy B-2.6 (Reverse Osmosis). Recommend initiating Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-! pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board. CITY COMMISSION DOCUMENTATION TO: David T. Harden, City Manager FROM:~~,~ire~ct~anning and Zoning SUBJECT: MEETING OF FEBRUARY 92, 1994 INITIATION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1 ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION: The action requested of the Commission is that of initiating Amendment 94-1 to the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. Pursuant to LDR Section 9.2.1, "a Plan Amendment shall only be initiated by formal action of the City Commission." Thus, this item is before the Commission for formal action. BACKGROUND: The City is allowed to enact two amendments to its Comprehensive Plan each year. This amendment (94-1) will be the first such amendment for 1994. The amendment focuses on updating the work program in the Plan; updating the status of various objectives and policies; corrections and general housekeeping; and addressing private petitions for land use plan amendments. The Planning and Zoning Board formally reviewed this item at a Special Meeting on February 14, 1994. The Board recommended that the City Commission initiate Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1, containing the material stated in the attached staff report and the following additional items: * Update Land Use Element Table L-1 (existing land use inventory). * Correct the description of the Planning Area in the Land Use Element. * Add Public Facilities Policy B-2.5 (Aquifer Storage and Recovery). * Add Public Facilities Policy B-2.6 (Reverse Osmosis). RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, initiate Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1 pursuant to the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Board. Attachment: P&Z staff report of February 14, 1994. T:\advanced\CC94-1.DOC PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT MEETING OF: February 14, 1994 AGENDA ITEM: II-B. RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COMMISSION REGARDING THE INITIATION OF PLAN AMENDMENT 94-1 ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD.' The item before the Board is that of recommending to the City Commission those items which should be considered in Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1. Pursuant to LDR Section 9.2.1, amendments to the Plan must be formally initiated by the City Commission. BACK G RO U ND~ The City is allowed to enact two amendments to its Comprehensive Plan each year. This amendment (94-1) will be the first such amendment for 1994. The first amendment of the year generally focuses on updating the work program in our Plan; making adjustments to the Capital Improvement Program; updating the status of various objectives and policies; corrections and general housekeeping; and addressing private petitions for land use plan amendments. Most of the items suggested for inclusion in the Plan Amendment have been reviewed by the Board in previous work sessions. These items are listed below by category. DELRAY OAKS PRESERVATION: Change Conservation Policy B-1.2 (preservation of key parcels) Add Conservation Policy A-1.4 (preservation of recharge areas) Add Conservation Policy B-2.6 (protection of habitats) Add Open Space Policy B-2.5 (access to natural areas) Add Open Space Policy B-2.6 (facilities in natural areas) WASTEWATER REUSE: Change Conservation Policy A-4.7 ("grey water" for irrigation) Change Public Facilities Policy A-1.2 (ocean discharge) Delete Public Facilities Policy B-2.1 (WWTP effluent recycling) II.B. P & Z Staff Report Initiation of Plan Amendment 94-1 Page 2 WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM (rate structure): Change Public Facilities Policy B-3.1 (techniques to decrease water consumption) Delete Conservation Policy A-4.2 (penalty for excess use) TECHNICAL CHANGES: Change Coastal Mg'mt Policy A-2.3 (multi-jurisdictional impacts on ICWW) Change Coastal Mg'mt Policy A-4.1 (additional water dependent uses) Change Coastal Mg'mt Policy A-4.3 (program implementation participation) Change Coastal Mg'mt Policy B-1.4 (beach access) Change Coastal Mg'mt Policy D-I.1 (hazard mitigation) Change Coastal Mg'mt Policy D-1.2 (annual hurricane operations plan review) Change Intergovernmental Coordination Policy A-2.3 (resolution of conflicts) Housing Policy A-1.4 (sacred zoning) Housing Policy A-2.4 (sacred zoning) STATUS UPDATES: Conservation Policy A-4.6 (canal water for irrigation) Conservation Policy B-1.4 (wetland area along 1-95) Conservation Policy B-3.2 (Lake Ida shoreline) Public Facilities Objective B-2 (water supply) Housing Tables H-1 and H-2 and Figure H-1 (development potential) Change Coastal Mg'mt inventory (population in area) Change Coastal Mg'mt Policy D-4.1 (drainage improvements) Land Use Tables L-3 and L-4 and Figure L-4 (development potential) Change Land Use Policy C-4.3 (CBD development plan) Delete Land Use Policy C-4.6 (educational institutions in Pineapple Grove) Change Land Use Policy C-4.9 (capital improvement projects) Change Capital Improvement Policy A-i.1 (park and fire station in southwest) Delete Capital Improvement Policy A-3.10 (water and sewer enterprise fund) Part V - projects/programs schedule CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMMING: Revisions to five year schedule P & Z Staff Report Initiation of Plan Amendment 94-1 Page 3 LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENTS: Balance of Blood's Grove (94.81 acres from County: Medium Density Residential - 5 units per acre, to City: Medium Density Residential, Low Density Residential, Commercial Core and Open Space) Spence Property (14.4 acres from County: Commercial High Intensity to City: Medium Density Residential) RECOMMENDED ACTION.' By motion, recommend that the City Commission initiate Comprehensive Plan Amendment 94-1, containing the material stated in the staff report. Report prepared by: John Wal~r~'~-_ Reviewed By David Kovacs on:~~/~/~ T.' \Advanced\PZ94-1