09-22-92 September 22. 1992
A Regular meeting of the City Commission of the City of
Delray Beach, Florida, was called to order by Mayor Thomas E.
Lynch in the Commission Chambers at City Hall at 6:02 P.M.,
Tuesday, September 22, 1992.
1. Roll call showed:
Present - Commissioner Jay Alperin
Commissioner William Andrews
Commissioner Armand Mouw
Commissioner David Randolph
Mayor Thomas E. Lynch
Absent - None
Also present were - City Manager David T. Harden and
City Attorney Jeffrey S. Kurtz
2. The opening prayer was delivered by Chaplain Richard
Evans, Abbey Delray South.
3. The Pledge of Allegiance to the flag of the United
States of America was given.
4. Dr. Alperin requested that Item No. 8.E. be moved to
the Regular Agenda as Item No. 9.A.A., Mr. Randolph requested
that Item No. 8.R.1. be moved to the Regular Agenda as Item No.
9.A.A.A., Mr. Mouw requested that Item No. 8.R.5. be moved to the
Regular Agenda as Item No. 9.A.A.A.Ao, and Mayor Lynch stated
that two items, 9.S. and 9.T., have been added to the Regular
Agenda. Assistant City Attorney Ruby requested that Item No.
8.F. be removed from the Consent Agenda; she also requested that
Item No. 8.B. be moved to the Regular Agenda as Item No.
9.A.A.A.A.A. The City Manager advised that Item No. 9.F. can be
deleted from the agenda, as this was handled by the Planning and
Zoning Board. The City Attorney stated he is recommending that
the City not accept the offer of settlement in Item No. 9.N., the
settlement offer in Prescott vs Delray Beach, and requested that
this item be moved to the Regular Agenda as Item No. 9.B.1. Mr.
Andrews requested that Item No. 8.R.6. (1 and 2) be moved to the
Regular Agenda as Item No. 9.A.A.A.A.A.A.
Mr. Randolph moved for approval of the agenda, as
amended, seconded by Dr. Alperin. Upon roll call the Commission
voted as follows: Mr. Mouw - Yes; Dr. Alperin - Yes; Mr. Andrews
- Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor Lynch - Yes. Said motion passed
with a 5 to 0 vote.
5. Approval of Regular Meeting minutes. NONE.
6. Proclamations.
6.A. Mayor Lynch read and presented a proclamation proclaim-
ing the months of July through October, 1992 as "Child Care Aware
Campaign". Ms. Tirpak, Executive Director of Child Care Resource
and Referral, Inc., came forward to accept the proclamation.
6.B. Mayor Lynch read and presented a proclamation proclaim-
ing.the week of September 17 through 23, 1992 as "Constitution
Week". Alice Byrnes came forward to accept the proclamation.
6.C. Dr. Alperin read and presented a proclamation proclaim-
ing the month of October, 1992 as "Delray Beach Heritage Month"
Michael Weiner and Clay Wideman came forward to accept the proc-
lamation.
7. Presentations. NONE.
The following items were considered by the Commission
as the Consent Agenda:
8.A. Resolution No. 105-92. Resolution No. 105-92, recog-
nizing City Government Week, October 4-10, 1992, and encouraging
all citizens to support the celebration and corresponding actiwi-
ties, is before~the Commission for consideration. Approval is
recommended.
The caption of Resolution No. 105-92 is as follows:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, RECOGNIZING
CITY GOVERNMENT WEEK, OCTOBER 4-10, 1992, AND
ENCOURAGING ALL CITIZENS TO SUPPORT THE
CELEBRATION AND CORRESPONDING ACTIVITIES.
(Copy of Resolution No. 105-92 is on file in the official
Resolution Book)
8.B. A~c~ptance of Gr~n~ Funding. MOVED to the Regular
Agenda as Item No. 9.A.A.A.A.A.
8.C. Agreement with the Palm Beach School Board. The Com-
mission is to consider approval of an agreement with the Palm
Beach County School Board for instructional services and develop-
ment of vocational education programs for City employees for the
period July 31, 1992 through June 30, 1993. Approval is recom-
mended.
8.D. Combined Mutual Aid Agreement With She TQwn Qf Highlsnd
Beach. The Commission is to consider approval of a mutual aid
agreement with the Town of Highland Beach for assistance in law
enforcement emergencies which cross jurisdictional lines. Ap-
proval is recommended.
8.E. Resolution No. l10-92/Acquisition of Proper~y. MOVED
to ~he Regular Agenda as Item No. 9.A.A.
-2- 9122~92
8.F. HQld Harmless Agreement. REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA.
8.G. Selection of Additional Emergency Contractor. The
Commission is to consider approval of the selection of Ocean Bay
Construction, Inc., as an additional emergency contractor to
supply rental equipment and construction crews during emergency
situations. Approval is recommended.
8.H. Request for Final P~yment. The Commission is to con-
sider approval of a request from RPM Construction Co., Inc., for
final payment in the amount of $10,265.43 for completion of the
Pompey Park Pressbox project, with funding from Community Devel-
opment - Pompey Park Improvements (Account No.
118-1962-554-60.20). Approval is recommended.
8.I. Change Order No. 3/Request for Final Payment. The
Commission is to consider approval of a change order in the
amount of $13,860.40 to the contract with Ric-Man International,
Inc., for plus/minus as-built quantity adjustments on the 16"
Transmission and Subaqueous Crossing project and approve final
payment in the amount of $38,840.90, with funding from 1991 Water
~.and~Sewer~Revenue ~Bond -~S.E..lst ~.Street from U.S.. 1 - Intra-
~_ ~'-coastal~ Waterway~ (Account No. 447-5174-536-61.41). Approval is
recommended.
8.J. Planning and Zoning Board R~Qommendation. The Commis-
sion is to consider recommending that the City oppose proposed
changes to the Broward County plan to extend the University
Parkway. Endorsement is recommended.
8.K. Resolution No. 109-92. Resolution No. 109-92, vacating
and abandoning a portion of N.W. 4th Street between N.W. 8th and
10th Avenues, is before the Commission for consideration. Ap-
proval is recommended.
The caption of Resolution No. 109-92 is as follows:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, VACATING AND
ABANDONING THAT PART OF THE N.W. 4TH STREET
RIGHT-OF-WAY AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE
4 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY,
FLORIDA, BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY THE RIGHT-
OF-WAY OF N.W. 10TH AVENUE AND ON THE EAST BY
THE RIGHT-OP-WAY OF N.W. 8TH AVENUE, DELRAY
BEACH, FLORIDA.
(Copy of Resolution No. 109-92 is on file in the offi-
cial Resolution Book)
8.L. Rg~olution NQ, 10~-92. Resolution No. 101-92, assess-
ing the cost for abatement action necessary to remove nuisances
on 22 properties located within the City, is before the Commis-
sion for consideration. Approval is recommended.
-3- 9/22/92
The caption of Resolution No. 101-92 is as follows:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO
CHAPTER 100 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, ASSESSING COSTS FOR
ABATING NUISANCES UPON CERTAIN LAND(S) LOCAT-
ED WITHIN THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH AND PRO-
VIDING THAT A NOTICE OF LIEN SHALL ACCOMPANY
THE NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT; SETTING OUT ACTUAL
COSTS INCURRED BY THE CITY TO ACCOMPLISH SUCH
ABATEMENT AND LEVYING THE COST OF SUCH ABATE-
MENT OF NUISANCES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE AND FOR A DUE DATE AND INTEREST ON
ASSESSMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE RECORDING OF
THIS RESOLUTION, AND DECLARING SAID LEVY TO
BE A LIEN UPON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR
UNPAID ASSESSMENTS.
(Copy of Resolution No. 101-92 is on file in the Offi-
cial Resolution Book)
8.M. .Resolution No. 102-92. -Resolution No. 102-92, assess-
lng the costs ~ for abatement action necessary to demolish an
unsafe structure on property located at 414 S.W. 2nd Street, is
before the Commission for consideration. Approval is recommend-
ed.
The caption of Resolution No. 102-92 is as follows:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO
CHAPTER 165, OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, ASSESSING COSTS FOR
ABATEMENT ACTION REGARDING AN UNSAFE BUILDING
ON LAND(S) LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF DELRAY
BEACH; SETTING OUT ACTUAL COSTS INCURRED BY
THE CITY TO ACCOMPLISH SUCH ABATEMENT AND
LEVYING THE COST OF SUCH ACTION; PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR A DUE DATE AND
INTEREST ASSESSMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE
RECORDING OF THIS RESOLUTION, AND DECLARING
SAID LEVY TO BE A LIEN UPON THE SUBJECT
PROPERTY FOR UNPAID ASSESSMENTS; PROVIDING
FOR THE MAILING OF NOTICE.
(Copy of Resolution No. 102-92 is on file in the offi-
cial Resolution Book)
8.N. Resolution No. 103-92. Resolution No. 103-92, assess-
ing the costs for abatement action necessary to board up an
unsafe structure on property located at 138 S.W. 1st Avenue, is
before the Commission for consideration.
-4- 9/22/92
The Caption of Resolution No. 103-92 is as follows:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO
CHAPTER 165, OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, ASSESSING COSTS FOR
ABATEMENT ACTION REGARDING AN UNSAFE BUILDING
ON LAND(S) LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF DELRAY
BEACH; SETTING OUT ACTUAL COSTS INCURRED BY
THE CITY TO ACCOMPLISH SUCH ABATEMENT AND
LEVYING THE COST OF SUCH ACTION; PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND FOR A DUE DATE AND
INTEREST ASSESSMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE
RECORDING OF THIS RESOLUTION, AND DECLARING
SAID LEVY TO BE A LIEN UPON THE SUBJECT
PROPERTY FOR UNPAID ASSESSMENTS; PROVIDING
FOR THE MAILING OF NOTICE.
(Copy of Resolution No. 103-92 is on file in the offi-
cial Resolution Book)
8.0 THIS ITEM~WAS REMOVED~FROM THE~AGENDA.
8.P. Request to Hold a Special Even%. The Commission is to
consider a request from the Chamber of Commerce to hold the 5th
Annual Harvest Festival on November 14 and 15, 1992. Approval is
recommended.
8.Q. Resolution No. 104-92. Resolution No. 104-92, assess-
ing the costs for abatement action necessary to remove junked or
abandoned vehicles from four properties located within the City,
is before the Commission for consideration. Approval is recom-
mended.
The caption of Resolution No. 104-92 is as follows:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO
CHAPTER 90 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, ASSESSING COSTS FOR
ABATING NUISANCES BY REMOVING JUNKED AND/OR
ABANDONED VEHICLES WITHIN THE CITY OF DELRAY
BEACH; SETTING OUT ACTUAL COSTS INCURRED BY
THE CITY TO ACCOMPLISH SUCH ABATEMENT AND
LEVYING SAID COSTS; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFEC-
TIVE DATE AND FOR A DUE DATE AND INTEREST ON
ASSESSMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE RECORDING OF
THIS RESOLUTION, AND DECLARING SAID LEVY TO
BE A LIEN UPON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR
UNPAID ASSESSMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE MAILING
OF NOTICE OF LIEN.
(Copy of Resolution No. 104-92 is on file in the offi-
cial Resolution Book)
5 9/22/92
8.Ro AWARD OF BIDS AND CONTRACTS.
1. MOVED TO THE REGULAR AGENDA AS ITEM NO. 9.A.A.A.
2. Path Resurfacing and Construction - Municipal Golf
Course - Whiteside Construction, Inc., in the amount of
$69,140.50 with funding from Municipal Golf Course -
Other Improvements (Account No. 445-4761-572-63.90).
3. Landscape Maintenance - Atlantic Avenue Phases I
and II - Tare Landscaping in the amount of $14,465 with
funding from Beautification Trust Fund - Beautification
Maintenance Contracts (Account No. 119-4144-572-33.49).
4. Gravity Sewer System Modifications - Veteran's
Park-Dutch Construction Company, Inc., in the amount of
$35,732 with funding from Water and Sewer Renewal and
Replacement - Lift Station Conversion to Submersible
(Account No. 442-5178-536-61.83).
5. MOVED TO THE REGULAR AGENDA AS ITEM NO. 9.A.A.A.A.
6. (BOTH ITEMS) MOVED TO THE REGULAR AGENDA AS ITEM
NO. 9.A.A.A.A.A.A.
7. Hurricane Shutters - Public Works Complex - Wrono
Enterprises, Corp., in the amount of $23,998 with
funding from Environmental Services -.Buildings (Ac-
.count No.~001~3111-534-60.31) and Water and Sewer Fund
- Buildings (Account No. 441-5161-536-60.31).
8. Annual Bid Award - Fertilizer and Chemicals -
Multiple Awards to low responsive bidders as listed in
the staff report - in an estimated annual cost of
8121,687, with funding from Golf Course Gardening
Supplies (Account No. 445-4714-572-52.26) and Parks
Maintenance - Gardening Supplies (Account No.
001-4131-572-52.26).
Dr. Alperin moved for the adoption_ of the Consent
Agenda, as amended, seconded by Mr. Andrews. Upon roll call the
Commission voted as follows: Dr. Alperin - Yes; Mr. Andrews -
Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor Lynch - Yes; Mr. Mouw - Yes. Said
motion passed with a 5-0 vote.
REGULAR AGENDA
9.A. Review of Appealable Land DeyelQpm~ Actions of V~r~-
ous Boards. The Commission is to consider accepting the actions
and decisions made by the Planning and Zoning Board, Site Plan
Review and Appearance Board and the Historic Preservation Board
during the period September 8, 1992 through September 18, 1992.
Dr. Alperin moved to receive and file the report,
seconded by Mr. Andrews. Upon roll call the Commission voted as
follows: Mr. Andrews - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor Lynch -
Yes; Mr. Mouw - Yes; Dr. Alperin - Yes. Said motion passed with
a 5 to 0 vote.
9.A.A.(8.E.) Resolution No. l10-92/Acquisition of Property.
Resolution No. 110-92, authorizing the purchase of certain real
-6- 9/22/92
property located at 330 S.E. 3rd Avenue from Carteret Savings
Bank for the Habitat for~Humanity program, is before the.Commis-
sion for consideration.
(This item was inadvertently moved from the Consent
Agenda).
The City Manager presented Resolution No. 110-92:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING
THE CITY TO PURCHASE FROM SELLER CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY IN PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, WHICH
PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 330 S.E. 3RD AVENUE,
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, HEREBY INCORPORATING
AND ACCEPTING THE CONTRACT STATING THE TERMS
AND CONDITIONS FOR THE SALE AND PURCHASE
BETWEEN THE SELLERS AND THE CITY OF DELRAY
BEACH, FLORIDA.
(Copy of Resolution No. 110-92 is on file in the offi-
cial ResolutionBook) · ~?~.~
Dr. Alperin moved for the adoption of Resolution No.
110-92, seconded by Mr. Andrews. Upon roll call the Commission
voted as follows: Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor Lynch - Yes; Mr.
Mouw - Yes; Dr. Alperin - Yes; Mr. Andrews - Yes. Said motion
passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
Mr. Mouw moved to reconsider Item No. 8.J. from the
Consent Agenda, seconded by Mr. Randolph. Upon roll call the
Commission voted as follows: Mayor Lynch - Yes; Mr. Mouw - Yes;
Dr. 'Alperin - Yes; Mr. Andrews - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes. Said
motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
9.A.A.(8.J.) Planning and Zoning Board Recommendation. The
Commission is to consider endorsing a Planning and Zoning Board
recommendation that the City oppose proposed changes to the
Broward County plan to extend the University Parkway.
Dr. Alperin suggested that a letter be sent to the
County requesting that University Parkway be removed from the
five year County Thoroughfare Plan.
Dr. Alperin moved that the County be requested to
remove the University Parkway Plan from the County Thoroughfare
Plan, along with the opposition to the changes to the Broward
County plan, seconded by Mr. Mouw. Upon roll call the Commission
voted as follows: Mr. Mouw - Yes; Dr. Alperin - Yes; Mr. Andrews
- Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor Lynch - Yes. Said motion
passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
9.A.A.A.(8.R.1.) Award of Bids and Contracts. The Commission
is to consider an award of contract to A.L. Roarke for Fire/EMS
-7- 9/22/92
Records System Software - Fire Department - in the amount of
. $17,000,~ with ~funding from Fire~ Computer Equipment/Installation~
(Account No. 001-2311-522-60.57).
Assistant City Manager Barcinski responded to a ques-
tion by Mr. Randolph regarding the inflated price of $40,000 in
his backup memo dated September 17, 1992, by stating that if the
contract should be bid today, it would be $40,000, but A.L.
Roarke is honoring the $17,000 as originally bid.
Mr. Randolph move~ for approval, seconded by Dr.
Alperin. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Dr.
Alperin - Yes; Mr. Andrews - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor Lynch
- Yes; Mr. Mouw - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
9.A.A.A.A.(8.R.5.) Veteran's Park Redevelopment. The Commission
is to consider an award of contract to Dutch Construction Company
in the amount of $440,069 which includes Alternates 1, 2 and 3,
with funding from 1987 Utility Tax - Veteran's Park (Account No.
333-4151-572-61.42), General Construction Fund - Redevelopment
Veteran's Park (Account No. 334-4126-572-61.63) and Decade of
Excellence~Bond Issue (Account No. ~225-4126,572-61.63).
Mr. Mouw stated the $440,069 (includes Alternates 1, 2
and 3) does not agree with the backup material in the amount of
8440,059; it also states that $440,059 includes Alternates 2 and
3, but not Alternate 1.
The City Manager stated Alternate 1 is the additional
parking on the north side of the park, at a cost of $1,300; the
recommendation from staff was to award, with Alternates 2 and 3.
Mr. Mouw moved to award the Veteran's Park development
to Dutch Construction Company in the amount of $441,359, includ-
ing Alternates 1, 2 and 3, seconded by Dr. Alperin. Upon roll
call the Commission voted as follows: Mr. Andrews - Yes; Mr.
Randolph - Yes; Mayor Lynch - No; Mr. Mouw - Yes; Dr. Alperin -
Yes. Said motion passed with a 4 to 1 vote.
9.A.A.A.A.A.(8.B.) Acceptance of Grant Funding. The Commission
is to consider accepting a grant in the amount of $25,000 from
the Palm Beach County Sports Authority to help defray the City's
expenses associated with the Virginia Slims Tennis Tournament and
authorize Mayor Lynch to execute the associated grant agreement.
The City Manager stated that the City Attorneys have
negotiated a number of extensive changes in the agreement and,
upon discussion, it has been agreed to return this item to the
agenda of October 13, 1992.
9.A.A.A.A.A.A.(8.R.6.) Currie Commons P~rk Redev~lopm~n~ and
Miller Field Expansion - AGB Capital PropertiesJ Inc. as follows:
8 9/22/92
Currie Commons Park. The Commission is to consider
approval of the, Redevelopment of ~Currie~ Commons Park in the.
amoUnt of $312,200 with funding from 1987 Utility Tax - Currie
Commons (Account No. 333-4151-572-61.41) and Decade of Excellence
Bond Issue - Redevelopment of Currie Commons Park (Account No.
225-4146-572-61.64).
Mr. Andrews questioned if the City is over/under budget
on this project and what is being funded from each of the ac-
counts. The City Manager responded that it is within budget and
he can have a breakdown later in the meeting if the Commission
would like to proceed.
Miller Field. The Commission is to consider the expan-
sion of Miller Field in the amount of 8603,366 with funding from
1987 Utility Tax - Miller Park (Account No. 333-4151-572-61.40)
and Decade of Excellence Bond Issue - Miller Field South 10 acres
(Account No. 225-4166-572-61.62).
Mr. Andrews posed the same question for this item and
the City Manager stated he would have the information later in
the meeting. Mr. Andrews requested that these items be tabooed
~ ~.~iuntil~ tater~±n,~the~meeting.
Mr. Randolph questioned the time frame with regard to
commencement of work on these two parks. Digby Bridqes, Archi-
tect, responded that work will commence in approximately two
weeks.
At this point, Joe Safford, Finance Director, advised
that $227,000 was funded under the Decade of Excellence; $181,500
was funded under the Utility Tax for a total of $408,500, which
includes money for design work for the Currie Commons Park
project.
Mr. Safford stated, in reference to Miller Field,
funding in the amount of $270,000 in Utility Tax and $368,000 in
the Decade of Excellence resulted in a total of $638,000, the
amounts budgeted in the Capital Improvement program and, since
they are being combined, some shifting of funds may occur.
Mr. Andrews moved for approval of Item No. 8.R.6.,
subject to complete documentation of the two projects, seconded
by Dr. Alperin. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows:
Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor Lynch - Yes; Mr. Mouw - Yes; Dr.
Alperin - Yes; Mr. Andrews - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to
0 vote.
9.B. Appeal of a Site Plan Review and Appearance Board
Deci~iQn. The Commission is to consider an appeal of a Site Plan
Review and Appearance Board decision with regard to the signage
for Gold Coast Chiropractic which is located in Delray Crossings.
Staff recommends denial.
-9- 9/22/92
Lula Butler, Director of Community Improvement, stated
this is~an~appeal from the decision of ~the Site. Plan Reviews. and
Appearance Board, citing this will set a precedent.
David Schmidt, representing the applicant, Dr. Douglas
Manolakos, stated that, due to the location of the business, most
of the people coming into the shopping center will be unaware
that the business is there. During a tour of the City, he found
numerous situations in other shopping centers that have the exact
signage, in similar locations, which he itemized. Therefore, he
feels the precedent has already been established.
Upon a request for verification, Lula Butler responded
that the Master Sign Program could accommodate this signage;
however, this was the choice of SPRAB. Discussion followed.
Dr. Alperin moved to deny the appeal, seconded by Mr.
Andrews. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mayor
Lynch - Yes; Mr. Mouw - No; Dr. Alperin - Yes; Mr. Andrews - Yes;
Mr. Randolph - Yes. Said motion passed with a 4 to 1 vote.
. ~..B.i.(9.N.~)~.i~Settlement' Offer~ ~he-Commission is to .consider
~an'.offer ~of. se.ttlement in ~the Prescott ~vs. the City of Deli~y
Beach litigation.
Assistant City Attorney Tolces stated Mr. Prescott was
cited by the Code Enforcement Board as having an excess number of
flags and illegal ornamentation on his building during holidays,
.so he filed a suit against the City. An offer of settlement has
'been received from Mr. Prescott's attorney, proposing that the
City agree to revise the ordinance to the agreement of Mr.
Prescott to the extent that the City pay the attorney fees in the
amount of $3,500 and clear Mr. Prescott from all past Code En-
forcement violations.
The City Attorney advised the problem now with the
proposed settlement is that the City has no agreement from Mr.
Prescott and his attorney on an acceptable ordinance. If this
matter is to be settled, it is necessary to adopt an ordinance
that Mr. Prescott and his attorney will not challenge on an
upcoming holiday. It is his recommendation that the Commission
den~ the settlement offer.
Mr. Andrews moved to deny the settlement offer, second-
ed by Dr. Alperin. Upon roll call the Commission voted as fol-
lows: Mr. Mouw - Yes; Dr. Alperin - Yes; Mr. Andrews - Yes;
Mr. Randolph - No; Mayor Lynch - No. Said motion passed with a 3
to 2 vote.
At this point, the time being 7:00 P.M., the Commission
moved to the duly advertised Public Hearing portion of the agen-
da.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
-10- 9/22/92
10.A. RESOLUTION NO. 106-92. Resolution No. 106-92, levying
a tax on all properties within the City of Delray Beach, is
before the Commission for consideration. Approval is recommend-
ed. Prior to consideration of passage of this resolution, a
public hearing has been scheduled to be held at this time.
The City Manager presented Resolution No. 106-92:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, TO LEVY A TAX
ON ALL PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF DELRAY
BEACH, FLORIDA, FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERA-
TION, AND TO LEVY A TAX FOR THE PAYMENT OF
PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST ON BONDED INDEBTED-
NESS, AND TO ALLOCATE AND APPROPRIATE SAID
COLLECTIONS THEREUNDER.
(Copy of Resolution No. 106-92 is on file in the offi-
cial Resolution Book)
The City Attorney read the entire resolution. A public
hearing was held having .been legally advertised in compliance
with the laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the City
of Delray Beach, Florida. The public hearing was closed.
Mr. Randolph moved for the adoption of Resolution No.
106-92, seconded by Dr. Alperin. Upon roll call the Commission
voted as follows: Dr. Alperin - Yes; Mr. Andrews - Yes; Mr.
Randolph - Yes; Mayor Lynch - Yes; Mr. Mouw - Yes. Said motion
passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
10.B. Resolution No. 107-92. Resolution No. 107-92, levying
a tax on all properties within the Downtown Development Authority
Taxing District, is before the Commission for consideration.
Approval is recommended. Prior to consideration of passage of
this resolution, a public hearing has been scheduled to be held
at this time.
The City Manager presented Resolution No. 107-92:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, TO LEVY A TAX
ON ALL PROPERTIES WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN DEVEL-
OPMENT AUTHORITY TAXING DISTRICT OF THE CITY
OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, FOR MAINTENANCE AND
OPERATION, AND TO APPROPRIATE SAID COLLEC-
TIONS THEREUNDER.
(Copy of Resolution No. 107-92 is on file in the offi-
cial Resolution Book)
The City Attorney read the entire resolution. A public
hearing was held having been legally advertised in compliance
-11- 9/22/92
with the laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the City
of Delray Beach, Florida. The public hearing was closed.
Mr. Mouw questioned if the election has been held which
was to expand the entire Downtown Development Authority to the
north and somewhat to the south. The City Manager responded that
the deadline on that election is June of 1993 and as yet that has
not been held. Mr. Mouw requested clarification that the expand-
ed area will not be taxed, to which the City Attorney replied
that it will not.
Mr. Randolph moved for the adoption of Resolution No.
107-92, seconded by Dr. Alperin. Upon roll call the Commission
voted as follows: Mr. Andrews - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor
Lynch - Yes; Mr. Mouw - Yes; Dr. Alperin - Yes. Said motion
passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
10.C. Resolution No. 108-92. Resolution No. 108-92, making
appropriations of sums of money for all necessary expenditures of
the City from October 1, 1992 to September 30, 1993, is before
the Commission for consideration. Approval is recommended.
Prior to consideration of passage of this resolution, a public
hearing has been scheduled to be held at this time.
The City Manager presented Resolution No. 108-92:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, MAKING APPRO-
PRIATIONS OF SUMS OF MONEY FOR ALL NECESSARY
EXPENDITURES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH,
FLORIDA, FOR THE PERIOD FROM THE 1ST DAY OF
OCTOBER, 1992, TO THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER,
1993; TO PRESCRIBE THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND
PROVISIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE ITEMS OF
APPROPRIATIONS AND THEIR PAYMENT; AND TO
REPEAL ALL RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES WHOLLY
IN CONFLICT WITH THIS RESOLUTION AND ALL
RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES INCONSISTENT WITH
THIS RESOLUTION TO THE EXTENT OF SUCH INCON-
SISTENCY.
The City Attorney read the caption of the resolution.
A public hearing was held having been legally advertised in
compliance with the laws of the State of Florida and the Charter
of the City of Delray Beach, Florida. The public hearing was
closed.
The City Manager stated he would like to respond to
three budget-related inquiries from the first hearing. The first
was an explanation of the accomplishments of the City lobbyist;
two of the major items included the CRA Bill, which was passed,
allowing the CRA to sell or lease land at less than the fair
market value, if it is determined to be in the best interest of
the public; the DDA Bill was passed to extend the election date
-12- 9/22/92
to June of 1993. There were several other state-wide bills such
as providing a mechanism for local governments to offer ad valo-
rem tax relief for historic properties; an amendment to the
Whistle Blower Act that was felt could have been very damaging to
municipal governments; another bill on local improvements, pro-
vided additional projects that could be funded by assessments and
allowing other tax improvements to be accomplished, subject to
referendum, and there was a bill providing some funding for
training of school crossing guards. There were also bills that
would have been damaging to the City, which the lobbyist worked
on just as diligently.
The City Manager commented that other questions con-
cerned the total cost to the average homeowner for all the in-
crease in fees such as water, sewer and garbage. Part of the
increased fee for garbage is due to the Solid Waste Authority
shifting some of their charges for collection by changing tipping
fees. The end result is that the City fees increase and the fees
of the Solid Waste Authority decrease. The total increase for
the City for the three items is $37.56 a year for an average
homeowner. There is also a $16.44 decrease from the Solid Waste
Authority, .resulting in.a~net.~increase of 821.12 per year for the
average homeowner.
The City Manager gave rates of other municipalities
with regard to charges for dockage fees, including utilities. He
feels the City of Delray charges an average fee for the service.
Debbie Best, City of Delray Marina, thanked the City
Manager for his information regarding her inquiry. She presented
a compilation of facts the residents of the Marina had gathered
from Deerfield Beach to the south and West Palm Beach to the
north. Upon question prior to the meeting, she learned that the
Marina Revenue Account currently holds $120,000 and an additional
$55,000 will be earned from marina operations this fiscal year;
therefore, the residents feel that the dockage increase is unjus-
tified and burdensome. She also understands that enough surplus
revenue has been accumulated to allow a sum of $100,000 to be
transferred to the tennis facility account, as proposed in the
figures she received from City Hall. It is the feeling of the
residents that the increase is unjustified~ for the meager servic-
es provided by the City. She requested that the Commission
review the Marina and the fact sheet she distributed and delete
it from this Resolution that is to be adopted tonight.
Robert Rilling, resident of the Marina, stated that all
of the marinas he has previously resided in supplied individual
garbage containers, they were emptied daily and it was never a
problem such as the one that exists at the Delray Beach Marina.
The City Manager recommended holding the rate increase
in abeyance until such time as these problems can be resolved.
-13- 9/22/92
Mr. Mouw moved for the adoption of Resolution No.
108-92, with the provision that the rate increase on the dockage
at the City Marina be withheld until such time as the proper
improvements are made, at which time it will be reconsidered by
the Commission, seconded by Mr. Randolph. Upon roll call the
Commission voted as follows: Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor Lynch -
Yes; Mr. Mouw - Yes; Dr. Alperin - Yes; Mr. Andrews - Yes. Said
motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
/O.D. Ordinance NQ, 32-92. Ordinance No. 32-92, amending
Chapter 52 of the Code of Ordinances to provide for a decrease in
the customer and capacity charges for both residential and non-
residential water customers, both inside and outside the City, to
increase the commodity charges per 1,000 gallons of water con-
sumption and amending Subsection 2.4.3(K)(5)(a) of the Land
Development Regulations to provide for the correct code refer-
ence, is before the Commission for consideration on Second and
FINAL Reading. City Manager recommends approval. Prior to
consideration of passage of this ordinance on Second and FINAL
Reading, a public hearing has been scheduled to be held at this
time.
.The City Manager.presented Ordinance No. 32-92:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING TITLE
V, "PUBLIC WORKS", CHAPTER 52, "WATER", OF
THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY
BEACH, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING SUBHEADING
"RATES, CHARGES, AND FEES", SECTION 52.34,
"WATER RATES", SUBSECTION (B), "MONTHLY
RATES" TO PROVIDE FOR A DECREASE IN THE
CUSTOMER AND CAPACITY CHARGES, FOR BOTH
RESIDENTIAL AND NONRESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS,
BOTH INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE CITY, AND TO
INCREASE THE COMMODITY CHARGE PER 1,000
GALLONS OF WATER CONSUMPTION; BY AMENDING
SECTION 2.4.3(K)(5), "USER FEES" OF THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CiTY OF DELRAY
BEACH, FLORIDA, BY REPEALING SUBSECTION
2.4.3(K)(5)(a) IN ITS ENTIRETY, AND ENACTING
A NEW SUBSECTION 2.4.3(K)(5)(a) TO PROVIDE
FOR THE CORRECT CODE REFERENCE; PROVIDING A
SAVING CLAUSE; PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER
CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(Copy of Ordinance No. 32-92 is on file in the official
Ordinance Book)
The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance. A
public hearing was held having been legally advertised in compli-
ance with the laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the
City of Delray Beach, Florida. The public hearing was closed.
-14- 9/22/92
Dr. Alperin moved for the adoption of Ordinance No.
32-92 on Second and FINAL Reading, seconded by Mr. Mouw. Upon
roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mayor Lynch - Yes;
Mr. Mouw - Yes; Dr. Alperin - Yes; Mr. Andrews - Yes; Mr. Ran-
dolph - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
10.E. Ordinance No. 33-92 Ordinance No. 33-92, amending
Chapter 54 of the Code of Ordinances to provide for an increase
in the capacity and commodity charges, for both residential and
nonresidential/commercial sewer customers, both inside and out-
side the City, to decrease said residential and nonresiden-
tial/commercial sewer customer charge and amending Section
2.4.3(K)(5)(c) of the Land Development Regulations to provide for
the correct Code reference, is before the Commission for consid-
eration on Second and FINAL Reading. City Manager recommends
approval. Prior to consideration of passage of this ordinance on
Second and FINAL Reading, a public hearing has been scheduled to
be held at this time.
The City Manager presented Ordinance No. 33-92:
i AN.?ORDINANCE~.OF~.THE~.~CITY~'~COMMISSION OF THE
~CITY OF DELRA¥ BEACH,.FLORIDA, AMENDING TITLE
V, "PUBLIC WORKS' CHAPTER 54, "SEWERS",
SUBHEADING "RATES ~ND CHARGES", OF THE CODE
OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH,
FLORIDA, BY AMENDING SECTION 54.32, "SERVICE
RATES AND CHARGES", SUBSECTION (B), TO PRO-
VIDE FOR AN INCREASE IN THE CAPACITY AND
COMMODITY CHARGES, FOR BOTH RESIDENTIAL AND
NONRESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS, BOTH
INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE CITY, AND TO DECREASE
SAID RESIDENTIAL AND NONRESIDEN-
TIAL/COMMERCIAL CUSTOMER CHARGE; BY AMENDING
SECTION 2.4.3(K)(5), "USER FEES", OF THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF DELRAY
BEACH, FLORIDA, BY REPEALING SUBSECTION
2.4.3(K)(5)(c) IN ITS ENTIRETY, AND ENACTING
A NEW SUBSECTION 2.4.3(K)(5)(c) TO PROVIDE
FOR THE CORRECT CODE REFERENCE; PROVIDING A
SAVING CLAUSE; PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER
CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(Copy of Ordinance No. 33-92 is on file in the official
Ordinance Book)
The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance. A
public hearing was held having been legally advertised in compli-
ance with the laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the
City of Delray Beach, Florida. The public hearing was closed.
Dr. Alperin moved for the adoption of Ordinance No.
33-92 on Second and FINAL Reading, seconded by Mr. Randolph.
Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mr. Mouw - Yes;
-15- 9/22/92
Dr. Alperin - Yes; Mr. Andrews - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor
Lynch - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
10.F. Ordinance No. 43-92. Ordinance No. 43-92, amending
Chapter 51 of the Code of Ordinances to provide for increased
garbage and trash service charges and fees for residential ser-
vice and commercial service, to provide for an increase in the
fee for residential customer recycling service and to provide for
fees for separate vegetation collection service, is before the
Commission for consideration, on Second and FINAL Reading. City
Manager recommends approval. Prior to consideration of passage
of this ordinance on Second and FINAL Reading, a public hearing
has been scheduled to be held at this time.
The City Manager presented Ordinance No. 43-92:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING TITLE
V, "PUBLIC WORKS", CHAPTER 51, "GARBAGE AND
TRASH", OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY
OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING "RATES
~AND~CHARGES",~SECTION 51.~0, "REGULAR CHARGES
LEVIED", TO PROVIDE FOR INCREASED GARBAGE AND
TRASH SERVICE CHARGES AND FEES FOR RESIDEN-
TIAL SERVICE; TO PROVIDE FOR INCREASED GAR-
BAGE AND TRASH SERVICE CHARGES AND FEES FOR
COMMERCIAL SERVICE; TO PROVIDE FOR AN IN-
CREASE IN THE FEE FOR RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS
FOR RECYCLING SERVICE; TO PROVIDE FOR FEES
FOR SEPARATE VEGETATION COLLECTION SERVICE;
PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVID-
ING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(Copy of Ordinance No. 43-92 is on file in the official
Ordinance Book)
The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance. A
public hearing was held having been legally advertised in compli-
ance with the laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the
City of Delray Beach, Florida. The public hearing was closed.
Dr. Alperin moved for the adoption of Ordinance No.
43-92 on Second and FINAL Reading, seconded by Mr. Andrews. Upon
roll call the Commission voted as follows: Dr. Alperin - Yes;
Mr. Andrews - Yes; Mr. Randolph - No; Mayor Lynch - Yes; Mr. Mouw
- Yes. Said motion passed with a 4 to 1 vote.
10.G. Ordinance No. 44-92. Ordinance No. 44-92, amending
Chapter 50 of the Code of Ordinances to provide for an increase
in the public service tax on the purchase of electricity from
8.5% to 9.5% and providing for an exemption to residential users
only in the amount of 90 kilowatt hours, is before the Commission
for consideration on Second and FINAL Reading. City Manager
recommends approval. Prior to consideration of passage of this
-16- 9/22/92
ordinance on Second and FINAL Reading, a public hearing has been
scheduled to be held at this time.
The City Manager presented Ordinance No. 44-92:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING
CHAPTER 50, "UTILITIES GENERALLY; PUBLIC
SERVICE TAX", SECTION 50.15, "LEVY OF TAX",
OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF
DELRA¥ BEACH, FLORIDA, TO PROVIDE FOR AN
INCREASE IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE TAX ON THE
PURCHASE OF ELECTRICITY FROM 8.5% TO 9.5%;
PROVIDING FOR AN EXEMPTION TO RESIDENTIAL
USERS ONLY IN THE AMOUNT OF 90 KILOWATT
HOURS; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE; PROVIDING A
GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFEC-
TIVE DATE.
(Copy of Ordinance No. 44-92 is on file in the official
Ordinance Book)
The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance. A
public hearing was held having been legally advertised in compli-
ance with the laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the
City of Delray Beach, Florida.
Arthur Jackel, resident, stated, on returning from
vacation, he was surprised to learn there was to be a possible
increase in the utility tax. He suggested that the citizens of
Delray Beach be allowed a discount on the purchase of tickets for
any and all events that are to be held in the new Tennis Stadium.
The public hearing was closed.
Dr. Alperin moved for the adoption of Ordinance No.
44-92 on Second and FINAL Reading, seconded by Mr. Andrews. Upon
roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mr. Andrews - Yes;
Mr. Randolph - No; Mayor Lynch - Yes; Mr. Mouw - Yes; Dr. Alperin
- Yes. Said motion passed with a 4 to 1 vote.
Mayor Lynch announced that presentations are forthcom-
ing from the Swinton landscape architects and Mr. Andrews would
like to make a request and afford them the opportunity to work on
an answer prior to their presentations.
Mr. Andrews requested that they indicate what
item/items in each proposal will be designed in order that the
public can ascertain that this is an Historic District and it
relates to the town itself.
ll.A City Manaqer's Response to Prior Public Comments and
Inquiries.
-17- 9/22/92
ll.A.1. The City Manager responded to the crime problem in the
Pines of Delray East, by stating that there seems to be no pat-
tern; however, that area has been added to the extra patrol list
and suggested that the City's Crime Prevention personnel contact
the residents and initiate a Crime Watch and Citizens on Patrol
Programs to assist in dealing with this problem.
ll.A.2. The City Manager stated the project and infrastructure
at Allamanda Gardens was to be completed in two phases; the first
being the water and sewer lines, drainage and construction of the
interior road up to the final surface level. The exterior side-
walks and the final pavement to the road were to be completed
after the housing units were built. That final unit is now under
construction and the Commission awarded a contract to the Civil
Engineers and Surveyors at the Regular meeting of August 11, 1992
to complete the necessary surveying and data required to con-
struct the perimeter sidewalks, complete the road and correct
deficiencies to the drainage and swale improvements. The work
should be completed by the last of October, 1992.
The City Manager commented that there were allegations read
_by the~Palm~.Beach i~County~Guardians.~regarding ~sex and race dis-
crimination in the Police Department, but there was insufficient
information provided to investigate. He explained the status of
several allegations, some of which were misinterpreted or misrep-
resented.
ll.B. Comments and Inquiries on Non-Aqenda Items from the
Public,
ll.B.1. Patrick Parziale, 1001 Flame Vine Avenue, Pines of
Delray, questioned the suggestion of initiating a Crime Watch due
to the age of the residents. He suggested closing Flame Vine
Avenue, as it has two entrances off Lowson Boulevard.
ll.B.2. Lillian Feldman, resident, stated that she objects to
the.closing of Flame Vine Avenue at Lowson Boulevard because
there are two entrances and feels that there must be other alter-
natives. Mayor Lynch suggested that the Police Department be
allowed to review this situation and try to find a solution that
will be agreeable to everyone.
ll.B.3. Wanda Stimpson, Business Agent for IBF&O, representing
the blue collar employees of the City, stated she is requesting
that the City reconsider the straight time pay for those employ-
ees who willingly worked overtime securing City property during
preparations for Hurricane Andrew. Many of those employees had
not previously had time to protect their homes and property. She
feels it is the decent and fair thing to do.
ll.B.4. Frank Houston, on behalf of Jay Slavin, read a prepared
statement into the record requesting that the Commission consider
appointing a female to replace the seat soon to be vacated by
Commissioner Andrews.
-18- 9/22/92
ll.B.5. Sue Davis, on behalf of the South County Chapter of the
National Organization of Women, spoke in support of Verna Cook.
She also stated that Ms. Cook's attorney was not aware that the
settlement was on the agenda tonight and has requested that this
item be deleted.
ll.B.6. Ollie Dobson, 907 S.W. 3rd Court, cited numerous situa-
tions in which she feels she has been abused by the Delray Beach
Police Department for the past fourteen years and she would like
someone to take a good look at the system. Mayor Lynch stated he
would have it looked into.
At this time the Commission returned to the Regular
Agenda.
9.C. Presentation/Selection of Consulting Firm/Swinton
Avenue. The Commission is to consider presentations, approve the
ranking and authorize staff to negotiate a contract for architec-
tural services for the Swinton Avenue beautification project.
Presentations were given by the four short-listed firms
that were~selected and ranked as follows: ~
1. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
2. Greenehorne & O'Mara, Inc.
3. Lawson, Noble and Associates, Inc.
4. A. Grant Thornbrough and Associates
There was a short question and answer period following
each presentation.
William Wilsher, member of the Swinton Avenue Task
Team, stated one of the things the task team is looking for is a
strong landscape architectural lead and the firm should indicate
a good understanding of all the projects that are in progress in
the City. The task team feels it is also important that the firm
be accessible and open-minded to suggestions.
Mr. Andrews expressed a desire to award the contract to
A. Grant Thornbrough & AssOciates because of the sensitivity
shown to the project.
The City Manager advised that, under the Consultant
Competitive Negotiation Act, it is necessary to rank at lea~t
three firms. Following discussion by the Commission, the four
firms were ranked.
While the City Attorney tabulated the rankings, the
Commission moved to the next item.
9.D. Award of Bid for the Tennis Center/Stadium PrQject.
The Commission is to consider awarding the bid for construction
of the Tennis Center/Stadium Project.
-19- 9/22/92
The City Manager stated the City has been planning the
tennis center project for more than five years; however, the
tennis stadium is another project. Based on bids received, the
total cost involved for the two components is estimated at
$3,007,250, with $1,209,100 being proposed for the tennis stadium
and $1,798,150 proposed for the tennis center. At this time
there is no definite figure available for property acquisition
consisting of eleven (11) parcels, three of which contain houses.
The CRA conducted a study on the appraised value from the tax
roll and submitted a figure of $150,000; however, additional
money has been placed in that budget.
The City Manager stated the lowest bidder for the
project, Falkav, Inc., submitted a base bid of $2,465,000. A
number of additive alternates and deductive alternates have been
recommended, each of which were briefly noted. He also offered a
number of recommendations from staff, which included the instal-
lation of flagpoles, the mural on the east wall and some land-
scape changes. This brings the total bid award to $2,491,863.
In response to the question of an updated figure of
$3,~000,000 from~.the~original ~$2,500,000, the City Manager stated
the CRA is planning to sell bonds for a variety of projects early
next year, as they owe the City approximately 82,600,000. His
recommendation is that $500,000 be used to supplement the
$2,500,000 figure, which can be repaid from the use fees from the
stadium. Discussion followed regarding a financial review of the
project.
The City Manager advised that there are six (6) courts
that remain to be built at an estimated cost of $200,000.
Mr. Randolph questioned the $25,000 from the Sports
Authority, to which the City Manager responded that the $25,000
is to go toward the operating expense of the tournament.
Mr. Andrews suggested switching the royal palms and
dwarf palms to queen palms and deleting the wall mural at this
time. He also expressed concern that the project is 8250,000
over the proposed amount and that the $200,000 for six (6) tennis
courts is not included. The City Manager itemized several prob-
lems that have arisen regarding lighting, drainage and irriga-
tion, totaling approximately $100,000, which was totally unex-
pected.
Mark Marsh, of Digby Bridges, Marsh & Associates,
Architects, stated the cost of the stadium~ has increased about
$100,000 due to the installation of 3,000 permanent seats as
opposed to using rental seats. He gave a breakdown of the cost
of the problems mentioned earlier by the City Manager.
Discussion followed with the architect, resulting in a
majority consensus to keep the wall mural in.
-20- 9/22/92
Mr. Mouw suggested holding the palms out of the base
bid, reserving the right to restore them within thirty (30) days
or at some specified time; also, to have staff investigate the
source of the palms and the City's ability to move and plant
them, if this proves to be more economical.
Mr. Mouw moved to approve the award of the contract in
the amount $2,491,863 to Falkav, Inc.; however, that the palm
trees not be awarded in the base bid at this time, with the
understanding that they can be restored into the base bid within
thirty (30) days and, within the thirty (30) day period, the City
investigate other sources of material, movement and planting and
make a decision as to who is going to take charge of the palm
trees, seconded by Dr. Alperin. Upon roll call the Commission
voted as follows: Mr. Andrews - No; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor
Lynch - Yes; Mr. Mouw - Yes; Dr. Alperin - Yes. Said motion
passed with a 4 to 1 vote.
9.E. ~Qense Aqreemen~/Hiqhbr$dqe Associates and Coastal
Partners Limited. The Commission is to consider approving a
license agreement with Highbridge Associates and Coastal Partners
Limited.for the ~use of ai~portion~.of Canal Street, adjacent to
Brandy's Waterside Restaurant, to ~provide for a 'boat dock and
associated improvements.
Prior to discussion of this item, the City Attorney
advised that the results of the ranking of the firms for the
beautification of Swinton Avenue was completed. A. Grant
Thornbrough was chosen No. 1; Lawson, Noble & Associates, No. 2
and Kimley-Horn & Associates was No.3.
Dr. Alperin moved to approve the firm of A. Grant
Thornbrough for architectural services for the Swinton Avenue
beautification project, seconded by Mr. Andrews. Upon roll call
the Commission voted as follows: Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor Lynch
- Yes; Mr. Mouw - Yes; Dr. Alperin - Yes; Mr. Andrews - Yes.
Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
$~ndr~ Almy, resident, suggested the Commission might
consider the following questions at an upcoming workshop. She
posed questions regarding decisions on using license agreements
as opposed to a standard route through the Planning Department;
what criteria is used to make a decision to enter into a license
agreement; why does one project receive a license agreement and
another not; why is the proposal not presented to the Planning
and Zoning Department and why are license agreements not adver-
tised.to the public.
The City Attorney responded that the license agreement
is a right to use, rather than an interest in the real property
itself, allows the City some flexibility with respect to control-
ling the property and is easier to remove a party from the prop-
erty if they have a license agreement versus a lease-hold inter-
est. The reason other agreements are noticed is due to the fact
-21- 9/22/92
that it is a requirement in the Code of Ordinances of the City.
The projects, themselves, frequently do go through the Planning
process, but the agreements are between the City Commission and
the party in the agreement.
Mr. Mouw stated he is opposed to a twenty-five (25)
year license agreement to Mr. Handelsman and to whomever he
wishes to lease his property. He also objected to the fee of
$1,200 per year.
Assistant City Attorney Ruby stated the City Attorney's
office was approached by the Planning Department regarding the
implementation of some type of dock arrangement at Brandy's.
Upon meeting, the subject of abandonment or licensing was dis-
cussed. It was her recommendation that they appear before the
Commission prior to investing time or money on either process.
Upon question by Mr. Mouw if the usage of the dock is
restricted, Assistant City Attorney Ruby advised that it is not
restricted under the license agreement.
.... David. Kovacs, ~.Director ~of Planning, gave background
.~information explaining how this.license agreement came before the
Commission for consideration. If the Commission should approve
this license agreement, it would be necessary for the applicant
to apply to the Historic Preservation Board for another site plan
modification, a COA and proceed through the staff review in order
to decide if the temporary dining area could be made permanent.
Upon question, Mr. Kovacs stated the usage of the dock
is controlled by a permit from the Army Corp of Engineers and is
for the use of Brandy's customers. Mr. Mouw questioned who can
tie to the dock and for what time length. Mr. Kovacs responded
that the Corp permit does not allow dockage overnight; however,
it coUld be changed by a modified permit from the Army Corp of
Engineers. The City Attorney advised that the City has ordinanc-
es that prohibit overnight dockage.
The City Attorney stated that it is very clear in the
agreement that the City does not have fee simple title to the
property, but a right-of-way interest.
Arthur Menner, representing Highbridge Associates and
Coastal Partners, stated the right-of-way is subject to an ease-
ment in favor of the Corp of Engineers for the entire width of
the right-of-way, so he feels the property is not as valuable as
it would be if the City owned it outright. The limited right
that is being gained by this agreement is essentially the right
to tie into the anchoring devices for the dock in the City
right-of-way. The dock will be constructed entirely in the
Intracoastal Waterway. The twenty-five years is the length of
the lease the applicant has with the restaurant at that site.
-22- 9/22/92
Chris Brown, Director of Community Redevelopment Asso-
ciation, stated the CRA is very supportive of placing the dock in
front of Brandy's and feel it is an enhancement to the business
and the downtown area. He suggested that this item be tabled
until the next Regular Commission meeting when a more complete
presentation can be made.
Upon question by Mr. Mouw, the City Attorney responded
that the improvements, according to the license agreement, are
owned by the City.
Aleda Riley, resident, questioned how many persons are
going to be seated, how many boats will be allowed to tie up
there and how long will they be allowed to remain.
There was a 3 to 2 consensus to approve the docks, but
with no more procrastination.
Dr. Alperin moved to table this item, seconded by Mr.
Mouw. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mayor
Lynch - Yes; Mr. Mouw - Yes; Dr. Alperin - Yes; Mr. Andrews - No;
Mr. ~.Randolph - No .... Said.motion passed with a 3 to 2 vote. ~
9.F. Submission Requirements/WaterfQrd SAD. THIS ITEM WAS
DELETED FROM THE AGENDA.
9.G. THIS ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA.
9.H. Agreement with Palm Beach County/Beach Renourishment
Project. The Commission is to consider approval of an interlocal
agreement with Palm Beach County which provides the mechanism for
the contribution of funds appropriated by the County for Fiscal
Year 1992/93 to the shore protection (beach renourishment)
project proposed by the City. City Manager recommends approval.
The City Attorney stated the major concern is the
language in the agreement regarding the enforcement of the City's
coastal protection.
Mr. Mouw moved that the one-year agreement be signed
with the deletion of Paragraph 4.V., seconded by Mr. Randolph.
Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mr. Mouw - Yes;
Dr. Alperin - Yes; Mr. Andrews - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor
Lynch - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
9.I. Amendment No. 4 to the Aqreement with Waste Management.
The Commission is to consider approval of Amendment No. 4 to the
agreement with Waste Management which institutes the "green
route" for the separate collection of vegetative materials,
updates the rates and charges for services, and eliminates the
need for further amendments to reflect future rate changes. City
Manager recommends approval.
-23- 9/22/92
Mr. Mouw moved for approval of Amendment No. 4 to the
agreement with Waste Management, seconded by Dr. Alperin. Upon
roll call the Commission voted as follows: Dr. Alperin - Yes;
Mr. Andrews - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor Lynch - Yes; Mr.
Mouw - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
Before roll call, the City Manager responded to Mr.
Andrews' question regarding the penalty, should the City not
adopt this amendment, by stating that the Solid Waste Authority
charges $25.00 a ton for separately collected vegetation; where-
as, the regular collection dumping is approximately $43.00 a ton,
so the higher fee would be charged.
9.J. $~andard License Agreement/Boat Docking. The Commis-
sion is to consider approval of a standard license agreement and
authorizing the City Manager to approve said agreements to permit
temporary boat docking at Veteran's Park. Approval is recommend-
ed.
Mr. Mouw moved for approval, seconded by Mr. Randolph.
Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mr. Andrews -
~Yes;. Mr..Randolph - Yes; ~iMayor~Lynch - Yes; Mr. Mouw - Yes; Dr.
Alperin - Yes. Said 'motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
9.K. Approval Qf Line of Credit/Sun Bank. The Commission is
to consider approval of a Line of Credit in the amount of
$5,350,000 from Sun Bank to finance the Tennis Stadium/Facility
and Beach Renourishment projects. City Manager recommends ap-
proval.
Mr. Mouw moved for approval, seconded by Mr. Andrews.
Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mr. Randolph -
Yes; Mayor Lynch - Yes; Mr. Mouw - Yes; Dr. Alperin - Yes; Mr.
Andrews - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
9.L. Change Order No. 8/Elkins Constructors. Inc. The
Commission is to consider approval of a change order in the
amount of $32,059.49 for miscellaneous changes required in .con-
junction with the Water Treatment Plant Lime Softening Conversion
project, with funding from 1991 Water and Sewer Revenue Bond
Construction - Buildings (Account No. 447-5164-536-60.31). City
Manager recommends approval.
Dr. Alperin moved for approval of Change Order No. 8,
seconded by Mr. Randolph. Upon roll call the Commission voted as
follows: Mayor Lynch - No; Mr. Mouw - Yes; Dr. Alperin - Yes;
Mr. Andrews - No; Mr. Randolph - Yes. Said motion passed with a
3 to 2 vote.
9.M. Service Authorization No. 11/ Hazen and Sawyer. P.C.
The Commission is to consider approval of a service authorization
in the amount of $35,000 to the contract with Hazen and Sawyer,
P.C. for engineering services necessary to complete the City's
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Part 2, permit
-24- 9/22/92
application, with funding from Storm Water Utility Fund - Con-
sulting (Account No. 448-5411-538-33.15). City Manager recom-
mends approval.
Dr. Alperin moved for approval of Service Authorization
No. 11, seconded by Mr. Mouw. Upon roll call the Commission
voted as follows: Mr. Mouw - Yes; Dr. Alperin - Yes; Mr. Andrews
- Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor Lynch - Yes. Said motion passed
with a 5 to 0 vote.
9.0. Appointment to the Board of Construction Appeals. The
Commission is to consider the appointment of a member to the
vacant architect position on the Board of Construction Appeals to
a term ending August 31, 1993.
Mr. Randolph moved to nominate Roy Simon as a member to
the Board of Construction Appeals, seconded by Dr. Alperin. Upon
roll call the Commission voted as follows: Dr. Alperin - Yes;
Mr. Andrews - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor Lynch - Yes; Mr.
Mouw - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
9.P ..... ~ .~Discussion'~Reqardinq Public Schools in Delray Beach.
The Commission is to,~consider a discussion of Public Schools in
Delray Beach.
Dr. Alperin stated he spoke with a neighbor who wanted
to place his home on the real estate market and was told, on two
separate occasions, that the real estate company would have
difficulty selling his home due to the quality of the schools in
Delray Beach. He feels a letter should be sent to both real
estate companies, Coldwell Banker and Gimelstob, expressing the
displeasure of the Commission in the performance of their real-
tors and instruct them to give out appropriate information. He
suggested having the Education Board sponsor a tour of all the
schools for the realtors. Mayor Lynch stated he feels the Com-
mission should have something in writing from the neighbor, so as
not~ to appear acting on hearsay.
Kathryn Sloan, Chairperson on the Education Board and a
realtor, stated she would like to personally attend a Board
breakfast for the Board of Realtors and encourage the distribu-
tion of the brochures prepared by the Education Board, as they
are not being marketed in the manner intended.
9.Q. Scheduling of an Impasse Resolution Hearing. The
Commission is to consider selecting a date to hold an impasse
resolution hearing on the City's collective bargaining agreement
with the International Brotherhood of Firefighters and Oilers.
The City Attorney stated the City declared an impasse
at the September 16th bargaining session. At that time it was
recommended that the Special Master proceeding be waived because
there are two issues concerning wages and workers' compensation
and it was felt unnecessary to expend time and effort on a Spe-
-25- 9/22/92
cial Master opinion on those issues. Ms. Stimpson, Business
Agent for IBF&O, agreed to waive the Special Master proceeding.
This item has been placed on the agenda in order for the Commis-
sion to schedule a hearing so a contract can be put in place as
expeditiously as possible. However, yesterday he received a call
from Ms. Stimpson, who advised that their position has been
reconsidered and she is reneging on her verbal waiver. It will
be approximately two months before these issues can be brought
before the Commission for consideration.
9.R. $~t~lement Offer. The Commission is to consider an
offer from Verna Cook in the amount of $100,000 to settle pending
litigation against the City. City Attorney recommends denial.
The City Attorney stated this settlement offer was
received in the City Manager's office on September 16, 1992. At
that time he spoke with Mr. Klein indicating that he would place
it on the agenda, because there was a specific demand of
$100,000. Mr. Klein responded that he would like that to occur.
The City Attorney feels there is no need to review or discuss
this and that the amount is outrageous.
Mr. Mouw moved to deny the settlement offer, seconded
by Mr. Andrews. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows:
Mr. Andrews - Yes; Mr. Randolph - No; Mayor Lynch - Yes; Mr. Mouw
- Yes~ Dr. Alperin - Yes. Said motion passed with a 4 to 1 vote.
9.S. Aqre~ment with Palm Beach County. The Commission is to
consider an agreement with Palm Beach County for the development
of a wellfield at Morikami Park. Approval is recommended.
The City Attorney advised new language has been negoti-
ated concerning the City's indemnification with respect to their
pollution. The City is now policing them from liability, but
will not be responsible to other parties for their pollution,
which was formerly a concern.
Mr. Mouw moved for approval, seconded by Dr. Alperin.
Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mr. Randolph -
Yes; Mayor Lynch - Yes; Mr. Mouw - Yes; Dr. Alperin - Yes; Mr.
Andrews - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
9.T. City Attorney's Office Budqet. The Commission is to
consider approval of an expenditure bud3get and authorize the
City Manager to identify a funding source to supplement the City
Attorney's Office budget for Fiscal Year 1991/92 in order to
cover outside counsel and other professional services expenses.
Mr. Mouw moved for approval of additional funding in
the amount of $67,000, seconded by Dr. Alperin. Upon roll call
the Commission voted as follows: Mayor Lynch - Yes; Mr. Mouw -
Yes; Dr. Alperin - Yes; Mr. Andrews - No; Mr. Randolph - Yes.
Said motion passed with a 4 to ! vote.
-26- 9/22/92
~IRST READINGS
12.A. Ordinance No. 47-92. Ordinance No. 47-92, amending the
Land Development Regulations with regard to modification of the
SAD extension provisions to accommodate the Marina Cay SAD, is
before the Commission for consideration on First Reading. If
passed, Public Hearing will be held October 13th.
The City Manager presented Ordinance No. 47-92:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE
LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, BY AMENDING CHAPTER 4, "ZONING
REGULATIONS", SECTION 4.4.25(C)(3), "ESTAB-
LISHMENT'', TO ALTER THE CRITERIA FOR ESTAB-
LISHMENT OF A LARGE SCALE MIXED USE SPECIAL
ACTIVITIES DISTRICT; BY AMENDING SECTION
4.4.25(I)(5) TO CHANGE THE DATE OF EXPIRATION
FOR THE MARINA CAY SAD TO AUGUST 22, 1995;
PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, A SAVING
~CLAUSE~,i~AND~ANi~EFFECTiVEDATE.
The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance.
Mr. Mouw moved for the adoption of Ordinance No. 47-92
on First Reading, seconded by Mr. Randolph. Upon roll call the
Commission voted as follows: Mr. Mouw - Yes; Dr. Alperin - No;
Mr. Andrews - No; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor Lynch - Yes. Said
motion passed with a 3 to 2 vote.
!
12.B. Ordinance No. 49-92. Ordinance No. 49-92, amending the
Future Land Use Map from Recreation and Open Space to Commercial
Core for a portion of the Veteran's Park parking lot, is before
the Commission for consideration on First Reading. If passed,
Public Hearing will be held October 13th.
The City Manager presented Ordinance No. 49-92:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, CHANGING THE
CITY'S LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION IN THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR A PORTION OF THE
VETERANS PARK PARKING LOT AS THE SAME IS MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, FROM "RECREA-
TION AND OPEN SPACE" TO "COMMERCIAL CORE";
AMENDING THE LAND USE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR
EXEMPTION FROM THE TRANSMITTAL-AND-CRC PRO-
CESS; PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, A
SAVING CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance.
-27- 9/22/92
Mr. Randolph moved for denial of Ordinance No. 49-92 on
First' Reading, seconded by Mr. Andrews. Upon roll call the
Commission voted as follows: Dr. Alperin - Yes; Mr. Andrews -
Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor Lynch - Yes; Mr. Mouw - Yes. Said
motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
12.C. Ordinance No. 50-92. Ordinance No. 50-92, rezoning a
portion of the Veteran's Park parking lot property from CF (Com-
munity Facilities) district to CBD (Central Business District),
is before the Commission for consideration on First Reading. If
passed, Public Hearing will be held October 13th.
The City Manager presented Ordinance No. 50-92:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, REZONING AND
PLACING LAND PRESENTLY ZONED CF (COMMUNITY
FACILITIES) DISTRICT IN THE CBD (CENTRAL
BUSINESS DISTRICT) ZONE; SAID LAND BEING A
PORTION OF THE VETERANS PARK PARKING LOT AS
THE SAME IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
i HEREIN;. ANDi~AMENDING ."ZONING 'DISTRICT MAP,
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, 1990"; PROVIDING A
GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, A SAVING CLAUSE, AND
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance.
Dr. Alperin moved for denial of Ordinance No. 50-92 on
First Reading, seconded by Mr. Mouw. Upon roll call the Commis-
sion voted as follows: Mr. Andrews - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes;
Mayor Lynch - Yes; Mr. Mouw - Yes; Dr. Alperin - Yes. Said
motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
12.D. Or~in~nc~ NO, 46-92. Ordinance No. 46-92, rezoning a
portion of the Linton International Plaza property in conjunction
with the establishment of a Checkers Restsurant from PC (Planned
Commercial) to GC (General Commercial), is before the Commission
for consideration on First Reading. If passed, Public Hearing
will be held October I3th. Planning and Zoning Board recommend
approval, with a vote of 6 to 1.
The City Manager presented Ordinance No. 46-92:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, REZONING AND
PLACING LAND PRESENTLY ZONED PC (PLANNED
COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT IN THE GC (GENERAL
COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT; SAID LAND BEING A
PORTION OF TRACT "A", LINTON INTERNATIONAL
PLAZA PLAT 2, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF
AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 51, PAGE 3 OF THE
PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA,
AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN,
-28- 9/22/92
AND AMENDING "ZONING DISTRICT MAP, DELRAY
BEACH, FLORIDA, 1990"; PROVIDING A GENERAL
REPEALER CLAUSE, A SAVING CLAUSE AND AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance.
Mr. Andrews moved for the adoption of Ordinance No.
46-92 on First Reading, seconded by Mr. Mouw.
Dr. Alperin expressed concern regarding the zoning and
the fact that it is an out parcel; and, he feels that the hazard-
ous traffic situation at that intersection is going to be accen-
tuated if this project is approved. He also questioned the fact
that it appears there should be an additional paved lane but this
has never been completed. Mr. Kovacs stated that is the respon-
sibility of Ocean Properties. Discussion followed.
Mr. Andrews withdrew his motion, Mr. Mouw withdrew his
second.
~ Mr. Mouw.moved for the adoption of Ordinance No. 46-92
on First Reading, seconded by Mr. Randolph. Upon roll call the
Commission voted as follows: Mr. Randolph'~ Yes; Mayor Lynch -
Yes; Mr. Mouw - Yes; Dr. Alperin - No; Mr. Andrews - No. Said
motion passed with a 3 to 2 vote.
Dr. Alperin requested that staff investigate the addi-
tional lane and why it has not been finalized.
12.E. Ordinance No. 45-92. Ordinance No. 45-92, rezoning and
placing land presently zoned RM (Multiple Family Residential)
district in R-1AA (Single Family Residential) district, said land
being all of the plat of Simmons Cay located on the west side of
State Road A-l-A, just south of Vista Del Mar Drive, is before
the'Commission for consideration on First Reading. If passed,
Public Hearing will be held October 13th. Approval is recommend-
ed, subject to the findings and recommendations of the Planning
and Zoning Board.
The City Manager presented Ordinance No. 45-92:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, REZONING AND
PLACING LAND PRESENTLY ZONED RM (MULTIPLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT IN THE R-iAA
(SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT; SAID
LAND BEING ALL OF THE PLAT OF SIMMONS CAY, AS
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 69, PAGE 100 OF THE
PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA,
TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF THE PLAT OF OCEAN
CAY, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 50, PAGE 59, OF
THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY,
FLORIDA, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DE-
-29- 9/22/92
SCRIBED HEREIN; AND AMENDING "ZONING DISTRICT
MAP, DELRA¥ BEACH, FLORIDA, 1990"; PROVIDING
A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, A SAVING CLAUSE
AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance.
Mr. Mouw moved for the adoption of Ordinance No. 45-92
on First Reading, seconded by Mr. Andrews. Upon roll call the
Commission voted as follows: Mayor Lynch - Yes; Mr. Mouw - Yes;
Dr. Alperin - Yes; Mr. Andrews - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes. Said
motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
12.F. Ordinance No. 48-92. Ordinance No. 48-92, amending the
Land Development Regulations by amending Section 4.4.15 "Planned
Office Center (POC) District", Subsection (G), "Supplemental
District Regulations", to provide that the first ten feet of the
front yard setback adjacent to a right-of-way shall be a land-
scape area, is before the Commission for consideration on First
Reading. If passed, Public Hearing will be held October 13th.
Approval is recommended, subject to the findings and recommenda-
tions of the~Planning~and.Zoning Board.
The City Manager presented Ordinance No. 48-92:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE
LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, BY AMENDING SECTION 4.4.15,
"PLANNED OFFICE CENTER (POC) DISTRICT" SUB-
SECTION (G), "SUPPLEMENTAL DISTRICT REGULA-
TIONS'', TO PROVIDE THAT THE FIRST TEN FEET OF
THE FRONT YARD SETBACK ADJACENT TO A RIGHT-
OF-WAY SHALL BE A LANDSCAPED AREA; PROVIDING
A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, A SAVING CLAUSE,
AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance.
Dr. Alperin moved for the adoption of Ordinance No.
48-92 on First Reading, seconded by Mr. Andrews. Upon roll call
the Commission voted as follows: Mr. Mouw - Yes; Dr. Alperin -
Yes; Mr. Andrews - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor Lynch - Yes.
Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote.
13. Comments and Inquirie~ on Non-Agenda Items.
13.A.1. Dr. Alperin questioned if there is an ordinance or Code
requirement that could demand the cleaning of structures along
the 6th fairway of the Municipal Golf Course. Mr. Andrews com-
mented there are more violations south of the 4th hole.
13.A.2. Mr. Mouw stated that he will be unable to attend the
meeting of October 13th and questioned if the meeting could be
-30- 9/22/92
rescheduled for October 20th. The City Manager advised that a
Workshop has been rescheduled on that date. Mayor Lynch an-
nounced that he will be out of town for the meeting of October
27th.
13.A.3. Mayor Lynch questioned if the City is continuing its
patrol of the parking violations at the flea market in the Dixie
Boulevard area.
13.A.4. Mayor Lynch commented that he feels the idea of a
disqount for senior citizen tickets at the tennis facility has
merit~ as long as it is used on the inside. The City Attorney
stated that is completely under the control of Liddun Interna-
tional.
13.A.5. Mr. Andrews stated he would like to institute foreclo-
sure proceedings on Drexel Properties at 189 Linton Boulevard for
landscape code violations which date back to 1989. This fine
continues to build and has reached a total of 86,500. The City
Attorney stated this should be brought before the Code Enforce-
ment Board, as they are the only body that has control over that
process.
13.A.6. Mr. ~Andrews requested a date certain on the Sign Code
update.
13.A.7. Mr. Andrews questioned the status of the cleaning and
repaving of N.E. 14th Street between N.E. 2nd and 3rd Avenues.
13.A.8. Mr. Andrews expressed the feeling that the CRA should
be directed to buy the two lots on North Swinton; both lots are
unsightly and sends the wrong message for the entire block.
13.A.9. Mr. Andrews requested a legal opinion on the City's
position regarding flags in public rights-of-way. Upon question,
the City Attorney advised the City can make a statement for their
right.
13.A.10. Mr. Andrews requested a legal opinion regarding the
validity of keeping the DRI on the Delint project and what the
consequences are for those issues that have not been followed
through. The City Attorney stated that it is the recommendation
of staff for a continuation of the process that is currently in
progress; two alternatives that have been identified are as
follows: 1) to continue with the Code Enforcement process where-
in an extension was granted for their compliance until December
28, 1992; the City could request a reconsideration, or 2) it can
be dismissed and the City could go for an injunction.
13.C.1. The City Manager stated the City had one employee that
was recalled to active military duty after Hurricane Andrew and
he is requesting approval from the Commission to supplement his
wages, i.e., the difference between his military pay and the City
-31- 9/22/92
pay for the length of time he was required to be away 'from the
City. The Commission concurred.
13.C.2. The City Manager responded to a question regarding the
overtime wages by commenting that the City paid the employees of
the IBF&O time and one-half for working on Sunday. If those
employees were scheduled to work on Monday, the first eight (8)
hours were straight time and anything over eight (8) hours was
time and one-half.
Mayor Lynch declared the meeting adjourned at 11:45
P.M.
Ci~ty Cle~ ' '
ATTEST:
The undersigned is the City Clerk of the City of Delray
Beach and that the information provided herein is the minutes of
the meeting of said City Commission of September 22, 1992, which
minutes were formally approved and adopted by the City Commission
City 'C l~rk
NOTE TO READER:
If the minutes that you have received are not completed as indi-
cated above, then this means that these are not the official
minutes of the City Commission. They will become the official
minutes only after they have been reviewed and approved which may
involVe some amendments, additions or deletions to the minutes as
set forth above.
-32- 9/22/92