Loading...
07-12-83 JULY 12~ 1983 A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, was called to order by Mayor Willard V. Young in the Council Chambers at City Hall at 7:05 P.M., Tuesday, July 12, 1983. 1. Roll call showed: Present - Council Member Malcolm T. Bird Council Member Doak S. Campbell Council Member Arthur Jackel Council Member Edward L. Perry Mayor Willard V. Young Absent - None Also present were - Acting City Manager Elizabeth Arnau, and City Attorney Herbert W.A. Thiele. 2. The opening prayer was delivered by Dr. Wallace Mast, Church of the Palms. 3. The Pledge of Allegiance to the flag of the United States of America was given. 4. Mr. Bird moved for approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of June 28, 1983 and the special meeting of July 5, 1983, sec- onded by Mr. Jackel. Said motion passed unanimously. 4.a. Mayor Young read a proclamation proclaiming the week of July 24, 1983, as "Fight Against Muscular Dystrophy Week". 5.a. Sam Schwimer, Pines of Delray, stated that last week the Board of Directors of the Pines of Delray Association sent a letter requesting that Council place on this agenda consideration of an appeal from the decision of the Planning and Zoning Board disapproving the present location of a satellite dish on the grounds of the Pines. He noticed that this matter has not been included and requests that Council place this on the agenda so that this matter can be resolved. 5.a.2. Kathi Sumrall, 4 N.W. 16th Street, referred to the recent sale of City property, on which a well was located, and the proceedings which occured before the sale. With so much activity regarding this parcel she finds it extremely difficult to understand why Council did not go out and look at this parcel before selling it. 5.a.3. Percy Greenberg, 1341 N.W. 19th Terrace, referred to an article which appeared in the newspaper that mentioned the people's amendment which will be on the November 1984 ballot. He suggested that Council and everyone concerned get together and begin to educate and inform the citizens what this amendment really means. 5.a.4. Mr. Bird stated that he has just read a memorandum from Mr. Carlson regarding the Pines of Delray satellite dish; it seems from the last paragraph that staff is not prepared nor is the information avail- able at this time to render a judgment. Mr. Bird moved to delay this item until the July 26th meet- ing or such a later date as may be required to get the adequate backup; if it is not available they will inform the Condominium Association of a later date, if a later date is required, seconded by Mr. Jackel. Said motion passed unanimously. Mayor Young declared a recess the time being 7:22 P.M. The meeting was reconvened the time being 7:24 P.M. 5.b.1. Mr. Perry stated that a few days ago he received a copy of a request being sent to department heads, from the IAC, relative to the wage comparison study requested by Council; they are requesting informa- tion not only from our departments but also information from Boca Raton and Boynton Beach. He suggested that when they give a directive or request to a committee that they not be allowed to make directives to departments unless Council specifically asks them to. 5.b.2. Mr. Bird stated he would like to take this opportunity to thank Fred McCoy and the NSA Committee for this weekend and would en- courage him to continue his efforts and include Council in any other brotherhood schemes he may have. 5.c. There were no Non-Agenda items by the City Attorney. 5.d. The Acting City Manager stated the City had delivered yester- day a request to the Health Department that the water moratorium be lifted and the treatment plant capacity be increased to 20.38 MGD from 15.2 MGD; they should hear from them in about three to four weeks. 6. Mr. Jackel moved for approval of the agenda with item 38 to be made first item of business on the regular agenda, item 29 to be made second item of business on the regular agenda and item 36 be deleted from the agenda, seconded by Mr. Bird. Said motion passed unanimously. Before roll call Mr. Perry questioned the rational for moving items 38 and 29 to the beginning of the regular agenda. Mr. Jackel stated that when theYe are many people in the audience coming for one item it is usually their procedure to place it first, rather than hold them up. Mr. Perry stated that if they continually bring items to the front of the agenda just because there is a large group of people only interested in that item they are in effect acquiescing to citizens who are not interested in their government. He feels it may be good for people to see what is going on in the City. At this point the roll was called to the motion. Mr. Campbell stated that with regard to item 36, Resolution No. 71-83 re: Priority lists for road widening, which was pulled from the agenda, he is concerned that since they will be getting into pro- jects soon he would not like to delay any intent of Council. He would like to let the County know what their intentions and concerns are and if the City is going to take it upon themselves to reverse the recom- mendations of the County and City staff they need to do this as soon as possible. Mr. Bird stated that the staff at the County has made a decision to await additional input from the MPO; if Council takes action by their next regular meeting the County will have their input in a timely manner. Mr. Campbell stated, for the record, that he is ready to go on this matter and does not need any further input. PUBLIC HEARING 7. Intent to Sell City Property. Council is to consider a motion of intent to sell City property, Lots 20 through 24, Block 47 to Francis McAlonan in the amount of $17,100. A public hearing has been scheduled to be held at this time. The City Attorney stated that, in accordance with the Code of Ordinances, a public hearing has been scheduled to be held at this time relative to the proposal of the City to sell Lots 20 through 24, Block 47 to Francis McAlonan in the amount of $17,100. Mr. Bird moved to express an intent to sell City property in the amount of $17,100 to Francis McAlonan with proceeds to be placed in the surplus property fund, seconded by Mr. Jackel. Said motion passed unanimously. - 2 - 7/12/83 8. Ordinance No. 39-83 - Homewood and Atlantic Rezonin9. Ordinance No. 39-83, repealing Ordinance No. 24-83 relative to rezoning to RM-6 (Multiple Family Dwelling) District, is before Council for consideration on Second and FINAL Reading. The property is located at the southeast corner of Atlantic Avenue and the recently realigned Homewood Boulevard. Prior to consideration of passage of this ordinance on Second and FINAL Reading, a public hearing has been scheduled to be held at this time. The Acting City Manager presented Ordinance No. 39-83: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 24-83 AND ENACT- ING A NEW ORDINANCE REZONING AND PLACING LAND PRESENTLY ZONED R-1AA (SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING) DISTRICT IN RM-6 (MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING) DISTRICT, A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE WEST ½ OF THE SOUTHWEST ¼ OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, LOCATED AT THE SOUTH- EAST CORNER OF ATLANTIC AVENUE AND THE RECENTLY REALIGNED HOMEWOOD BOULEVARD, AND AMENDING "ZONING MAP OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, 1977". (Copy of Ordinance No. 39-83 is on file in the official Ordinance Book) The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance. A public hearing was held having been legally advertised in compliance with the laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the City of Delray Beach, Florida. Betty Jo Spalding, stated that when the 18 lots on Homewood Boulevard were bought there was a deed restriction that went with them which is in effect until 2008. The Grimes Foundation managed this restriction and owned the original property. When Woodlake development came in across the street the developer wanted to put two-story homes on Homewood Boulevard. The homeowners fought this, and won, on the basis of the deed restrictions. When the City decided to realign Homewood Boule- vard the first plan was to swap the land with the developer, put the road in and there would be no expense to the City. However, in the agreement was the provision that Mr. Miller could put commercial prop- erty on that corner. There was quite a public outcry at that time and it was decided it would be best to buy the land outright, build the road and later sell the property. At that point Mr. Miller, who owned Wood- lake, went to the Grimes Foundation and told Mr. Mahori , who was the director of the estate at that time, that the residents were not opposed to commercial property; that was a lie. The deed restrictions were then lifted because of what the developer said. She has spoken to Mr. Mahori and he is willing to come before Council and tell them how this came about. Mrs. Spalding stated that now Council wants to change this piece of land to RM-6 which would allow approximately 12 families. The home- owners will not fight it any longer if Council would consider giving them the following four concessions to the selling of the land; (1) that all entrance roads and signs advertising this development be at least 100 feet from her mother's driveway, which is the first house on Home- wood Boulevard, (2) that the developer install a landscaped buffer zone approximately 50 feet in width between her property line and their property line, (3) that the parking area, garbage dumpster or any gar- bage pickup area not be adjacent to her house and (4) that the deed restrictions pertaining to the roof construction, which is tile, and single story construction be obeyed. Following discussion, the City Attorney stated, for Coun- cil's information, that a valid release of restrictions was executed by the Grimes Foundation about two years ago and it is recorded in the public records releasing all of the deed restrictions. - 3 - 7/12/83 Mr. Campbell stated his position is that the rezoning and land use change should go ahead if at all possible. He would be agree- able to all the conditions stated; however, he does not know if they would be binding other than the fact that Council and members of the Planning and Zoning Board would take cognizance that any site plan approval coming up on that project would be looked at in terms of the limitations, or preferences, which they might express. There are enough conditions in the site plan approval process that are intended to pro- tect adjacent property owners from harmful effects. Mr. Perry stated if they were to keep this to a single story building they would have so many restrictions on the land they could not sell it. There would also have been a problem with back out parking either onto Homewood Boulevard or Atlantic Avenue. Knowing they could not have this they looked at the next alternative which was RM-6. Marie Horenburger, 510 North Swinton Avenue, stated the last time the Planning and Zoning Board heard this they recommended denial of the rezoning. At that time it was based on the possibility of the land remaining some kind of City park. She suggested that the Planning and Zoning Board could rehear this; they were not aware that the City plan- ned to sell the property to pay for the realignment when they denied it. A letter of objection dated June 8, 1983 was received from Shirley M. Scott as personal representative of H.A. and Alverna Donald- son, 243 Homewood Boulevard. The public hearing was closed. Mr. Perry moved to table this item until such time as they can look at the points being brought forth by Mrs. Spalding, with the Planning Director and others who may be able to advise them as to wheth- er or not they will seriously encumber the property to the point that they cannot sell it and then possibly look to see if it could be left as a park area. Motion died for lack of a second. Mr. Bird stated that they had a first and second reading on this ordinance once before this year; now it is back because of a tech- nical difficulty. Upon question by Mr. Bird, Mrs. Spalding stated that she would not rely upon the competance and wisdom of the Planning and Zoning Board to protect her mother's property. Mr. Campbell moved for the adoption of Ordinance No. 39-83 on Second and FINAL Reading, seconded by Mr. Jackel. Upon roll call Council voted as follows: Mr. Bird - Yes; Mr. Campbell - Yes; Mr. Jackel - Yes; Mr. Perry - No; Mayor Young - Yes. Said motion passed with a 4 to I vote. 9. Ordinance No. 40-83 - Changing the City's Land Use Plan Designation. Ordinance No. 40-83, repealing Ordinance No. 25-83 rel- ative to changing the City's Land Use Plan Designation in the Comprehen- sive Plan for a parcel of land located at the southeast corner of Atlan- tic Avenue and the recently realigned Homewood Boulevard from SF (Single Family) to MF (Multiple Family), is before Council for consideration on Second and FINAL Reading. Prior to consideration of passage of this ordinance on Second and FINAL Reading, a public hearing has been sched- uled to be held at this time. The Acting City Manager presented Ordinance No. 40-83: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 25-83 AND ENACT- ING A NEW ORDINANCE CHANGING THE CITY'S LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE WEST ½ OF THE SOUTHWEST ¼ OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ATLANTIC AVENUE AND THE RECENTLY REALIGNED HOMEWOOD BOULEVARD FROM SF (SINGLE FAMILY) TO MF-6 (MULTIPLE FAMILY ); AMENDING THE LAND USE PLAN; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. - 4 - 7/12/83 (Copy of Ordinance No. 40-83 is on file in the official Ordinance Book ) The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance. A public hearing was held having been legally advertised in compliance with the laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the City of Delray Beach, Florida. Betty Jo Spalding, stated that the Land Use Plan says that west of Military Trail was to be nothing but single family homes; now there are restaurants and shopping centers. She questioned why they have a Land Use Plan when almost every Council meeting involves approv- ing a change. Kathi Sumrall, member of the Planning and Zoning Board, questioned why Council has this board when every time the Board has a unanimous decision about something Council overturns it. The public hearing was closed. Mr. Jackel moved for the adoption of Ordinance No. 40-83 on Second and FINAL Reading, seconded by Mr. Bird. Upon roll call Council voted as follows: Mr. Bird - Yes; Mr. Campbell - Yes; Mr. Jackel - Yes; Mr. Perry - No; Mayor Young - Yes. Said motion passed with a 4 to 1 vote. 10. Ordinance No. 42-83 - Hamilton Annexation. Ordinance No. 42-83, relative to annexing a 0.326-acre parcel of land, subject to R-1AA (Single Family Dwelling) District, located west of N.W. 4th Avenue between 'N.W. llth Street and N.W. 9th Street, is before Council for consideration on Second and FINAL Reading. Prior to consideration of passage of this ordinance on Second and FINAL Reading, a public hearing has been scheduled to be held at this time. The Acting City Manager presented Ordinance No. 42-83: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, ANNEXING TO THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH LOT 5, BLOCK 4, OF AMENDED PLAT OF LAKE IDA GARDENS, ACCORD- ING TO THE PLAT THEREOF ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, IN PLAT BOOK 23, PAGE 192, WHICH LAND IS CON- TIGUOUS TO EXISTING MUNICIPAL LIMITS OF SAID CITY; REDE- FINING THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID CITY TO INCLUDE SAID LAND; PROVIDING FOR THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF SAID LAND; PROVIDING FOR THE ZONING THEREOF. (Copy of Ordinance No. 42-83 is on file in the official Ordinance Book ) The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance. A public hearing was held having been legally advertised in compliance with the laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the City of Delray Beach, Florida. The public hearing was closed. Mr. Jackel moved for the adoption of Ordinance No. 42-83 on Second and FINAL Reading, seconded by Mr. Perry. Upon roll call Council voted as follows: Mr. Bird - Yes; Mr. Campbell - Yes; Mr. Jackel - Yes; Mr. Perry - Yes; Mayor Young - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. 11. Ordinance No. 43-83 - Castilyn Annexation. Ordinance No. 43-83, relative to annexing a 0.25-acre parcel of land, subject to R-IA (Single Family Dwelling) District, located west of Germantown Road, between Royal Palm Drive and S.W. 10th Street, is before Council for consideration on Second and FINAL Reading. Prior to consideration of passage of this ordinance on Second and FINAL Reading, a public hearing has been scheduled to be held at this time. - 5 - 7/12/83 The Acting City Manager presented Ordinance No. 43-83: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, ANNEXING TO THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, WHICH LAND IS CONTIGUOUS TO EXISTING MUNICIPAL LIMITS OF SAID CITY; REDEFINING THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID CITY TO INCLUDE SAID LAND; PROVIDING FOR THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF SAID LAND; PROVIDING FOR THE ZONING THEREOF. (Copy of Ordinance No. 43-83 is on file in the official Ordinance Book) The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance. A public hearing was held having been legally advertised in compliance with the laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the City of Delray Beach, Florida. The public hearing was closed. Mr. Jackel moved for the adoption of Ordinance No. 43-83 on Second and FINAL Reading, seconded by Mr. Perry. Upon roll call Council voted as follows: Mr. Bird - Yes; Mr. Campbell - Yes; Mr. Jackel - Yes; Mr. Perry - Yes; Mayor Young - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. 12. Ordinance No. 44-83 - Amending Code - Landscaping. Ordi- nance No. 44-83, amending Chapter 9 "Buildings and Construction" of the Code of Ordinances relative to accessways, is before Council for con- sideration on Second and FINAL Reading. Prior to consideration of passage of this ordinance on Second and FINAL Reading, a public hearing has been scheduled to be held at this time. The Acting City Manager presented Ordinance No. 44-83: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 9, "BUILDINGS AND CON- STRUCTION'', ARTICLE X, "LANDSCAPING", BY REPEALING SEC- TION 9-374(f), RELATIVE TO ACCESSWAYS; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (Copy of Ordinance No. 44-83 is on file in the official Ordinance Book) The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance. A public hearing was held having been legally advertised in compliance with the laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the City of Delray Beach, Florida. The public hearing was closed. Mr. Jackel moved for the adoption of Ordinance No. 44-83 on Second and FINAL Reading, seconded by Mr. Perry. Upon roll call Council voted as follows: Mr. Bird - Yes; Mr. Campbell - Yes; Mr. Jackel - Yes; Mr. Perry - Yes; Mayor Young - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. 13. Ordinance No. 45-83 - Containers And/Or Service Required. Ordinance No. 45-83, amending Chapter 12, "Garbage and Trash" of the Code of Ordinances relative to containers and/or service required, is before Council for consideration on Second and FINAL Reading. Prior to consideration of passage of this ordinance on Second and FINAL Reading, a public hearing has been scheduled to be held at this time. The Acting City Manager presented Ordinance No. 45-83: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA , ,AMENDING CHAPTER 12, "GARBAGE AND TRASH", ARTICLE I, "IN GENERAL", OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, BY REPEALING SECTION 12-4, "CONTAINERS REQUIRED", AND ENACTING A NEW SECTION 12-4, "CONTAINERS AND/OR SERVICE REQUIRED", TO PROVIDE FOR THE GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL SITES AND MAINTENANCE OF CONTAINERS; TO PROVIDE FOR THE PRO- CEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR THOSE AREAS OF THE CITY AND - 6 - 7/12/83 CUSTOMERS RECEIVING TYPE A, ROLL-OUT CART SERVICE, TYPE B, REAR-DOOR/ SIDE-DOOR SERVICE, TYPE C , CURBSIDE - GARBAGE AND HOUSEHOLD TRASH IN DISPOSABLE CONTAINERS SERVICE, TYPE D, CURBSIDE IN OWNER'S CONTAINER SERVICE, AND TYPE E, MECHANICAL CONTAINERS AND COMMERCIAL REFUSE CONTAINER SERVICE; PROVIDING FOR REQUIREMENTS FOR DIS- POSAL OF LARGE ITEMS OR PILES OF GARDEN AND YARD TRASH; PROVIDING RESTRICTIONS ON COLLECTION OF INDUSTRIAL AND HAZARDOUS WASTES; PROVIDING FOR USE OF OTHER TYPE UNITS OR CONTAINERS; PROVIDING FOR REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUC- TION AND DEMOLITION SITES AND FOR SUBSTANCES WHICH AFFIX THEMSELVES TO ROAD SURFACES; PROVIDING FOR REQUIREMENTS FOR LOADING AND UNLOADING AREAS; PROVIDING FOR REQUIRE- MENTS FOR ALL COMMERCIAL AND PUBLIC PARKING LOTS HAVING MORE THAN 100 SPACES; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE; PROVID- ING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (Copy of Ordinance No. 45-83 is on file in the official Ordinance Book) The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance. A public hearing was held having been legally advertised in compliance with the laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the City of Delray Beach, Florida. Alice Finst, 707 Place Tavant, representing the Homeowners League of Chatelaine, questioned when households will be serviced if a holiday falls on one of their pickup days. Mayor Young stated they will discuss this with Waste Manage- ment and get the necessary information. Mrs. Finst stated that in areas which receive rear-door/ side-door pickup the garbage cans are left in a space away from the street. However, if you put your trash in a can which has to be placed at the curb, they are left there. She questioned if it would be pos- sible, for those areas that are paying for side-yard pickup, to have the garbage man carry the trash can back to where the rest of the containers are stored. Mr. Campbell stated that perhaps they could place their trash in a bag which did not need a container. He feels that if they want the protection of their home and do not want to put a can by the curb they should buy bags and do it that way. The public hearing was closed. Mr. Jackel moved for the adoption of Ordinance No. 45-83 on Second and FINAL Reading, seconded by Mr. Perry. Upon roll call Council voted as follows: Mr. Bird - Yes; Mr. Campbell - Yes; Mr. Jackel - Yes; Mr. Perry - Yes; Mayor Young - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. 14. Ordinance No. 46-83 - TyDes of Garbage and Trash Collection Services. Ordinance No. 46-83, amending Chapter 12, "Garbage and Trash" of the Code of Ordinances relative to types of garbage and trash collection and adopting the service map, is before Council for considera- tion on Second and FINAL Reading. Prior to consideration of passage of this ordinance on Second and FINAL Reading, a public hearing has been scheduled to be held at this time. The Acting City Manager presented Ordinance No. 46-83: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 12, "GARBAGE AND TRASH", ARTICLE I, "IN GENERAL", OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, BY ADDING A NEW SECTION 12-8.1, "LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE TYPES", TO ESTABLISH THE LOCATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR THE USE OF THE TYPES OF GARBAGE AND TRASH COLLECTION SERVICE THROUGH- OUT THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH; PROVIDING a SAVING CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. - 7 - 7/12/83 (Copy of Ordinance No. 46-83 is on file in the official Ordinance Book) The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance. A public hearing was held having been legally advertised in compliance with the laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the City of Delray Beach, Florida. The public hearing was closed. Mr. Perry moved for the adoption of Ordinance No. 46-83 on Second and FINAL Reading, seconded by Mr. Jackel. Upon roll call Coun- cil voted as follows: Mr. Bird -Yes; Mr. Campbell -Yes; Mr. Jackel - Yes; Mr. Perry - Yes; Mayor Young - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. 15. Ordinance No. 47-83 - Rates for Garbage and Trash Service. Ordinance No. 47-83, amending Chapter 12, "Garbage and Trash", of the Code of Ordinances relative to setting new rates for garbage and trash collection for all five types of services, is before Council for con- sideration on Second and FINAL Reading. Prior to consideration of passage of this ordinance on Second and FINAL Reading, a public hearing has been scheduled to be held at this time. The Acting City Manager presented Ordinance No. 47-83: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 12, "GARBAGE AND TRASH", ARTICLE I, "IN GENERAL", OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, BY REPEALING SECTION 12-15, "REGULAR CHARGES LEVIED" , AND ENACTING A NEW SECTION 12-15, "REGULAR CHARGES LEVIED", TO ESTABLISH THE SERVICE CHARGES FOR GARBAGE AND TRASH SERVICE FOR ALL TYPES OF SERVICE WITHIN THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH WHETHER RENDERED BY THE CITY OR ITS CONTRACTOR; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (Copy of Ordinance No. 47-83 is on file in the official Ordinance Book) The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance. A public hearing was held having been legally advertised in compliance with the laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the City of Delray Beach, Florida. The public hearing was closed. Mr. Jackel moved for the adoption of Ordinance No. 47-83 on Second and FINAL Reading, seconded by Mr. Perry. Upon roll call Council voted as follows: Mr. Bird - Yes; Mr. Campbell - Yes; Mr. Jackel - Yes; Mr. Perry - Yes; Mayor Young - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. Before roll call Mr. Perry questioned whether these rates take into effect the recent reduction in tipping fees which were given about two weeks ago. Mr. Waters stated that the tipping fee has not been changed yet. It will probably change in about ten days and at that time there is a mechanic in the contract for a reduction. At this point the roll was called to the motion. 16. Ordinance No. 48-83 - Mechanical Containers. Ordinance No. 48-83, amending Chapter 12, "Garbage and Trash" of the Code of Ordi- nances relative to mechanical containers, is before Council for con- sideration on Second and FINAL Reading. Prior to consideration of passage of this ordinance on Second and FINAL Reading, a public hearing has been scheduled to be held at this time. - 8 - 7/12/83 The Acting City Manager presented Ordinance No. 48-83: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 12, "GARBAGE AND TRASH", ARTICLE I, "IN GENERAL", OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA , BY AMENDING SECTION 12-8 (i) , "MECHANICAL CONTAINERS", TO PROVIDE FOR PRO- HIBITIONS FOR BLOCKING ACCESS TO MECHANICAL CONTAINERS, AND FOR PROHIBITIONS ON USE OF OR DEPOSITING OF GARBAGE AND TRASH INTO MECHANICAL CONTAINERS EXCEPT THOSE AS- SIGNED TO OR PAID FOR BY SAID USERS; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (Copy of Ordinance No. 48-83 is on file in the official Ordinance Book) The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance. A public hearing was held having been legally advertised in compliance with the laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the City of Delray Beach, Florida. The public hearing was closed. Mr. Jackel moved for the adoption of Ordinance No. 48-83 on Second and FINAL Reading, seconded by Mr. Perry. Upon roll call Council voted as follows: Mr. Bird - Yes; Mr. Campbell - Yes; Mr. Jackel - Yes; Mr. Perry - Yes; Mayor Young - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. 17. Ordinance No. 49-83 - Method of Billing. Ordinance No. 49-83, amending Chapter 12, "Garbage and Trash" of the Code of Ordi- nances relative to method of billing for charges, is before Council for consideration on Second and FINAL Reading. Prior to consideration of passage of this ordinance on Second and FINAL Reading, a public hearing has been scheduled to be held at this time. The Acting City Manager presented Ordinance No. 49-83: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 12, "GARBAGE AND TRASH", ARTICLE I , "IN GENERAL" , BY AMENDING SECTION 12-16, "METHOD OF BILLING FOR CHARGES ", TO PROVIDE THAT THE CITY'S CONTRACTOR(S) SHALL BILL THE CUSTOMERS RECEIVING TYPE E, MECHANICAL CONTAINERS AND COMMERCIAL REFUSE CONTAINER SERVICE, AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 12-15, THE MONTHLY SERVICE CHARGES FOR SUCH SERVICE, BUT THAT ANY DELINQUENT BILLS SHALL BE COLLECTED BY THE CITY PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS SET FORTH IN THIS CHAPTER; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (Copy of Ordinance No. 49-83 is on file in the official Ordinance Book) The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance. A public hearing was held having been legally advertised in compliance with the laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the City of Delray Beach, Florida. Stanley Katz, 1421 S.W. 27th Avenue, stated that although the billing will be paid directly to Waste Management do they have the right to change the rate which the City has set up in the contract. Mr. Bird replied that the rates will be established by Council. The public hearing was closed. Mr. Jackel moved for the adoption of Ordinance No. 49-83 on Second and FINAL Reading, seconded by Mr. Bird. Upon roll call Council voted as follows: Mr. Bird - Yes; Mr. Campbell - Yes; Mr. Jackel - Yes; Mr. Perry - Yes; Mayor Young - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. - 9 - 7/12/83 CONSENT AGENDA The following items are to be considered by Council as the Consent Agenda: 18. Roots Cultural Festival Support. Council is to consider authorizing expenditure up to $500 for the Roots Cultural Festival with funds to come from the contingency account. 19. Extension of Site and Development Plan Approval - Waterway North II. Council is to consider a request for a one year extension of site and development plan approval to July 26, 1984 for Waterway North II, located at the northeast corner of the Intracoastal Waterway and N.E. 8th Street. This was approved 6-0 by the Planning and Zoning Board. 20. Final Plat Approval - Pelican-Harbor North - Phase I. Council is to consider a request for final plat approval for Pelican Harbor North - Phase I, located north of Tropic Isle Drive between Spanish Trail and South Federal Highway. This was approved 7-0 by the Planning and Zoning Board. 21. Retention of Co-Counsel for Zonin~ Matters. Council is to consider authorizing retention of the firm of Johnston, Sasser, Randolph and Weaver as Co-Counsel relative to zoning matters with funding to come from the City Attorney's budget. Approval is recommended. 22. Sanitary Sewers and Water Utilities Acceptance. Resolution No. 69-83, accepting sanitary sewers and water utilities as operational as recorded in the plat of Domaine Delray, is before Council for con- sideration. The caption of Resolution No. 69-83 is as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, ACCEPTING ALL THE SANITARY SEWERS AND WATER UTILITIES INSTALLED IN DOMAINE DELRAY, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 44, PAGES 108 AND 109 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS OPERATIONAL AND SETTING THE INITIAL SCHEDULE OF RATES, FEES AND OTHER RELATED CHARGES TO BE IMPOSED FOR THE SERVICES AND FACILITIES FURNISHED BY SAID UTILITIES; PROVIDING THAT THIS RESOLU- TION SHALL NOT DISCHARGE THE DEVELOPER FROM STRICT PER- FORMANCE; PROVIDING FOR MAINTENANCE FOR AND REPAIRS BY THE DEVELOPER FOR ONE YEAR. (Copy of Resolution No. 69-83 is on file in the official Resolution Book) Mr. Bird moved for approval of the Consent Agenda, seconded by Mr. Perry. Said motion passed unanimously. REGULAR AGENDA 38. Ordinance No. 51-83 - Zoning Ordinance Amendment - Modi- fication of Approved Site and Development Plan. Ordinance No. 51-83, amending Chapter 30 "Zoning" of the Code of Ordinances that any decision of the Planning and Zoning Board shall be appealable to the City Coun- cil, is before Council for consideration on First Reading. If passed, Public Hearing will be held on July 26th. The Acting City Manager presented Ordinance No. 51-83: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 30, "ZONING ORDINANCE", SECTION 30-22, "SITE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN", SUBSECTION (F), "MODIFICATION OF AN APPROVED SITE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA; BY CLARIFYING THAT ANY DECISION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD SHALL BE APPEALABLE TO THE CITY COUNCIL BY THE APPLICANT AFFECTED; BY DELETING THAT THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD AS TO WHETHER A MODIFICATION IS MINOR OR MAJOR IS FINAL; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. - 10 - 7/12/83 The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance. Mr. Bird moved for the adoption of Ordinance No. 51-83 on First Reading, seconded by Mr. Jackel. Upon roll call Council voted as follows: Mr. Bird - Yes; Mr. Campbell - Yes; Mr. Jackel - Yes; Mr. Perry - Yes; Mayor Young - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. 29. Barwick Park Grant Application. Council is to consider an offer of $75,509 from the Department of Natural Resources for the devel- opment of Barwick Park. Mr. Jackel suggested that they allow the public to speak first and then Council can discuss this. Leonard Syrop, 1322-A High Point Place, stated that he is not against this park; what he is against is the method of developing and financing it. He feels the City is binding and saddling themselves for 25 years to all the conditions in the fine print of the grant; especially Section 16D Paragraph 5.23(12). He urged Council to read this carefully. Statistics show that this section of the City is not a deprived recreational area as the grant application states. He feels the need for a park, at this time, in the location proposed, has not been conclusively demonstrated. He proposed that the City develop this park land as they find the need for additional facilities; develop it, but let its progress be in accord with the need for it and the City's ability to finance it using their own priorities. Saul Horn, 801 N.W. 26th Avenue, stated, as indicated, they are talking about a park for a minimal youth population and with that in mind it is self-evident that a facility and multi-purpose field would fill that need. As to the funding of such a facility, he feels the City would demonstrate sound judgment by refusing the State's offer; the rational being that for its $75,000 the State, as a silent partner, will be setting policy as to the target dates and how the park is to be developed. He requested that Council do not accept State funding, but do build a facility in proportion to the needs of that area. Alice Finst, 707 Place Tavant, stated that on Thursday, July 7th, a meeting was held at her home, sponsored by the Homeowners' League of Chatelaine, to discuss the future of the land known as Barwick Park. The members attending were unanimous in their agreement that the Barwick plan should be preserved, in its entirety, as a much needed green space in their community. They felt the land use should be limited to day light hours and the City be encouraged to claim the grant being offered by the State; this is a now or never opportunity for park land develop- ment. Bob Miller, 17 N.W. 18th Street, stated that the group attending that meeting agreed that the park should have three phases. Phase I would address fencing, parking (limited), heart trail, open field area, irrigation, picnic area and park benches; Phase II would include the restrooms which they feel is important as the park further develops and Phase III would include a multi-purpose court. The figure of $75,509 has been addressed carefully by the Director of Park Planning for Palm Beach County, and he has volunteered his services to work in the planning and development of this park. Dan Winters, Director of Parks and Recreation, stated that the grant they have been offered is $75,509; the State has also asked him to reapply in August for another $73,000. They have an excellant possibility of getting a grant on top of a grant which would give the project approximately $150,000. Debbie London, 3311 Avenue Serrant, stated that whether they accept the grant or not she would like to see the development of the park and would offer her services as a volunteer to work on a task force towards this project. - 11 - 7/12/83 Terry Sullivan, 1700 Dover Road, stated that money is cer- tainly a problem, which they all need to address, but as far as the maintenance he cannot see that being a particular problem. He is sure that someone employed by the City could be pulled off a job to help at the facility if indeed the City decides to go ahead and develop it. Mr. Jackel stated that he has taken a great deal of time studying this situation. In communicating with the people in that area he found that they will accept a passive park with sufficient recrea- tional facilities to meet the needs of the children in that area. When the application was made by the City Administration it was for $200,000 on the basis that the land value was $410,000; an appraisal was then requested and the value of the land was determined to be $240,000. As a result the grant was reduced from $200,000to $120,000 by the Department of Natural Resources. The grant was then further reduced to $75,000 by the Florida Cabinet. He feels that Delray Beach is fully capable of managing their own affairs which would not be so if they accepted this grant. If they accept the grant, the City will have to maintain and operate the park for 25 years using their own money. He questioned whether the City should take the $75,000 and lose control of the park or have a City park where they have full control; he believes in City control. He intends to vote against accepting the State funds; how- ever, he would vote for the park if it were going to be a City park. As a business man he rejects this as a poor business deal. Mr. Bird stated his understanding had lead him to conclude, based on what he was told by Tallahassee, that their obligation is to spend such funds, as they receive from the State, on that park; they are not obligated to build the park they submitted. Upon question by Mr. Bird, the City Attorney stated that the only person he has talked to was Mr. Froekme, from DNR, whose basic outlook was that, if the City wants the money, they should let them know and then they would negotiate the project agreement terms. Mr. Bird suggested that they accept the funds subject to execution of the City's agreement; send it to Tallahassee saying that this amount of money is all they intend or will be bound to spend. If DNR does not accept this and insists that the City has to spend more money than is given, they will not accept the grant. Mr. Bird stated that he would like to acknowledge the efforts of Bob Miller, Ken Ellings- worth and Alice Finst who spent a lot of time and effort in making this park possible. Mr. Jackel stated that there in nothing in the grant that suggests what Mr. Bird has said. He does not question what he is saying but it was done verbally and he can only believe what he sees in writ- ing. Mr. Campbell left the Council Chambers at this time. Mr. Bird moved that they accept the grant offer in language which would preclude any misunderstanding on the part of DNR that we intended to exceed the amount of the offer in the development of the park; that we would do as and such items as were initially depicted in the grant application as that money would allow for, making it abun- dantly clear to them that those are the terms under which the City will accept the grant. If DNR chooses not to accept this then the City will not accept the grant, nor will they be obligated to the $163,000, sec- onded by Mr. Jackel. Upon roll call Council voted as follows: Mr. Bird - Yes; Mr. Campbell - Yes; Mr. Jackel - No; Mr. Perry - Yes; Mayor Young - Yes. Said motion passed with a 4 to 1 vote. Before roll call, upon question by Mr. Jackel, the City Attorney stated that the project agreement is something they would have to work out the specifics; it is a condition which he would have to put into the agreement. - 12 - 7/12/83 Upon question by Mr. Perry, Mr. Winters stated that even though the City gave DNR a plan for $200,000 they are not locked into that plan. He asked them for this is writing and also asked how much money the City has to spend above the $75,000; their answer was nothing. Mr. Campbell returned to the Council Chambers at this time. At this point the roll was called to the motion. Mr. Miller stated he would like to applaud Council for its foresight; there is nothing to lose on the issue as the motion is pro- posed. He requested that Council address designating or instructing some movement on the plan, assuming they get the approval. Mayor Young replied that Mr. Miller's request will be placed on next week's workshop agenda. Mayor Young declared a recess the time being 9:30 P.M. The meeting was reconvened the time being 9:33 P.M. 23. Appointments - Downtown Development Authority. Council is to consider appointing two members to the DDA to three-year terms expir- ing July 1, 1986. Mr. Bird moved to reappoint Mr. Lonnie E. Cook, Jr. and Dr. Carl Carter to three-year terms expiring July 1, 1986, seconded by Mr. Jackel. Said motion passed unanimously. 24. Interlocal A~reement Between the City and Palm Beach County Two Cent County Gasoline Tax. Council is to consider authorizing execution of an Interlocal Agreement relative to Two Cent County Gas- oline Tax in Palm Beach County. This item was postponed at the June 28th meeting until after the Metropolitan Planning Organization meeting on July 7th. Mr. Bird moved to authorize execution of the agreement, seconded by Mr. Perry. Said motion passed unanimously. 25. EMS Service to Gulfstream. Council is to consider approv- ing and authorizing execution of an agreement between the City and the Town of Gulfstream relative to providing Emergency Medical Services. Approval is recommended. Mr. Perry moved to authorize execution of an EMS Service agreement with Gulfstream, seconded by Mr. Bird. Said motion passed unanimously. Before roll call Mr. Jackel stated that this is a 10 year agreement with $175 charged per trip. He questioned if anyone is con- cerned about rising costs; perhaps they should reconsider the cost factor every two years. Mr. Jackel also questioned the previous trips made to Gulfstream while they were trying to get an agreement with them; should the City bill them for those recorded trips. The City Attorney replied that, in answer to Mr. Jackel's first question, there is no provision in the proposed agreement for an escalator clause. That is not to say it could not be renegotiated; between the parties there is also a termination clause which allows them to terminate with or without cause at any time. As to the other ques- tion, that is still being discussed and no resolution of the prior service payments has been made at this time. Mr. Bird stated, since it would seem they are protected through the termination clause, he would suggest they execute the agree- ment. If a decision is reached later to add language to the contract specifying what the escalation of costs shall be and Gulfstream does not agree, the contract would adequately arbitrate it by giving either side an opportunity to withdraw. At this point the roll was called to the motion. - 13 - 7/12/83 26. Amendment No. i to the Refuse Contract. Council is to consider approving and authorizing execution of Amendment No. I to the Refuse Contract between the City and Waste Management changing service for Woodlake and Spanish Wells Subdivisions to rear door/side door service. Approval is recommended. Mr. Perry moved to approve and authorize execution of Amend- ment No. 1, seconded by Mr. Bird. Said motion passed unanimously. 27. Amendment No. 2 to the Refuse Contract. Council is to consider approving and authorizing execution of Amendment No. 2 to the Refuse Contract between the City and Waste Management permitting Waste Management to bill customers directly for Type E mechanical container service. Approval is recommended. Mr. Bird moved to approve and authorize execution of Amend- ment No. 2, seconded by Mr. Perry. Said motion passed unanimously. 28. Lease of Public Works Complex. Council is to consider approving and authorizing execution of lease between the City and Waste Management for a portion of the Public Works Complex. Mr. Perry moved to authorize execution of the lease, sec- onded by Mr. Jackel. Said motion passed unanimously. 30. Invoice for Architectural Services - City Hall. Council is to consider a request from Kenneth Rubsamen for additional architectural services in the amount of $1,900 for changes where certain offices were modified, with funds to come from the City Hall Construction Account. Approval is recommended. Mr. Jackel moved to approve the invoice in the amount of $1,900, with funds to come from the City Hall Construction Account, seconded by Mr. Perry. Said motion passed unanimously. 31. Follow-up Study of Beach Maintenance Renourishment Project. Council is to consider authorizing a 60-month follow-up study of the 1978 beach renourishment project by Arthur V. Strock & Associates, Inc., in the amount of $23,400, with funds to come from the Erosion Control Fund. 75% of the cost will be reimbursed by the Department of Natural Resources. This is a regular annual study required by our State permit. Approval is recommended. Mr. Perry moved to authorize the follow-up study, seconded by Mr. Jackel. Said motion passed unanimously. Before roll call the City Attorney advised that the motion should include the language "subject to resolution of the agreement language". Mr. Perry amended his motion as advised by the City Attor- ney, Mr. Jackel amended his second. At this point the roll was called to the motion. 32. Proposed Boat Dock Extension - Michael Baldassare. Council is to consider authorizing modification in Section 9-531(b) of the Code of Ordinances to extend the boat dock an additional 12 feet at 245 Palm Trail. Approval is recommended. Mr. Perry moved to authorize modification in Section 9-531(D) of the Code of Ordinances, seconded by Mr. Jackel. Said motion passed unanimously. 33. Fence Repairs and New Fence Work. Council is to consider award of a contract for fence repairs to the low bidder, Southern Fence Company, with funds to come from the 1983-84 operating budgets of var- ious departments. City-wide costs for repairs and new fence work amounted to approximately $30,000 last year. Approval is recommended. - 14 - 7/12/83 Mr. Bird moved to award the contract to Southern Fence Company, seconded by Mr. Perry. Said motion passed unanimously. Before roll call, Mr. Bird explained that this contract is to do any fence or fence repairs required City-wide throughout the next budget year. At this point the roll was called to the motion. 34. Housekeeping Funds - Neighborhood Strategy Area. Council is to consider NSA's request for housekeeping funds (annual amount and specific line items). Approval is recommended. Mr. Perry stated he requested this item be placed on the agenda because they talked about the needs of the NSA but never au- thorized funds for any specific areas. Mr. Bird stated that it was his intention, when he requested this item to be on the agenda a few weeks ago, that Mr. McCoy should receive housekeeping and secretarial assistance. At that time he sug- gested that the NSA be placed under the City Clerk's Office for budget- ing purposes; this covers stationery, postage and secretarial assist- ance. If there is a project which is outside of that normal clerical function then Mr. McCoy would have to make a specific request to Council and ask for monies out of contingency funds. Mr. Perry requested that this item, regarding housekeeping funds, be withdrawn. 35. Reduction of Retainage - Force Main 50. Council is to consider authorizing reducing retainage from 5% ($33,786.90) to 1% which retains $6,757.38. This will authorize payment in the amount of $27,029.52 to H & H Engineering, Inc. Approval is recommended. Mr. Bird moved to authorize reduction of retainage and payment of $27,029.52 to H & H Engineering, Inc. Upon roll call Council voted as follows: Mr. Bird - Yes; Mr. Campbell - No; Mr. Jackel - Yes; Mr. Perry - Yes; Mayor Young - Yes. Said motion passed with a 4 to 1 vote. Before roll call the following discussion was had: Mr. Campbell stated he feels the retainage is there for a specific purpose; to correct any problems which may come about in a contract. He believes it should be as high as possible until the con- tract is complete, particularly with a contract of this size. Mr. Pontek, Public Utilities Director, stated that the contractor is at 99% completion; at this point in time he has asked for reduction to .0015% which would reserve a $500 retainage which he deems to be inadequately low. They have substantially less than $6,000 of work yet to complete; however, a 1% contingency seems to be consistent with what they have been doing. At this point the roll was called to the motion. 37. Ordinance No. 50-83 - Establishing Special Activities Dis- trict - Professional Office Plaza for Acquilano. Ordinance No. 50-83, amending Ordinance No. 15-81 relative to establishing SAD (Special Activities District) for property located on the west side of U.S. No. 1 between Linton Boulevard and S.E. 10th Street, is before Council for consideration on First Reading. This was approved 5-0 by the Planning and Zoning Board. If passed, Public Hearing will be held on July 26th - 15 - 7/12/83 The Acting City Manager presented Ordinance No. 50-83: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION l(a) OF ORDINANCE NO. 15-81, WHICH AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. 6-81 RELATIVE TO ESTABLISHING SAD (SPECIAL ACTIVITIES DISTRICT) FOR PROP- ERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF U.S. ~1, BETWEEN LINTON BOULEVARD AND S.E. 10TH STREET IN SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, TO PROVIDE FOR ADDITIONAL CONDI- TIONAL USES IN SUCH SAD; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance. Mr. Bird moved for the adoption of Ordinance No. 50-83 on First Reading, seconded by Mr. Jackel. Upon roll call Council voted as follows: Mr. Bird - Yes; Mr. Campbell - Yes; Mr. Jackel - Yes; Mr. Perry - Yes; Mayor Young - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. 39. Presentation of Budget for Fiscal Year 1983-84 - Dave Hud- dleston. Mr. Huddleston presented Council with the 1983-84 budget. He stated that there is no budget message with this; the philosophy of the City Manager is normally conveyed to Council in a budget message. This year they did not have a message prepared by the City Manager. Neither himself nor the City Clerk felt it would be appropriate to bring in their comments on someone else's philosophy. He has, however, pre- pared a memo highlighting assumptions and format which was used in the compilation of the figures. Basically, the highlights describe how the Manager's recommended figures were arrived at, the format of the budget documents themselves, the millage rate and how that was arrived at, the personnel user fees and the projected budget. Mr. Huddleston advised that August 8th will be the first date for a budget workshop. Mayor Young declared the meeting adjourned at 10:03 P.M. Acting City Clerk ATTEST: MAYOR The undersigned is the Acting City Clerk of the City of Delray Beach and that the information provided herein is the minutes of the meeting of said City Council of July 12, 1983, which minutes were formally approved and adopted by the City Council on ~ ~//~ . Actihg City Clerk NOTE TO READER: If the minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the official minutes of City Council. They will become the official minutes only after they have been reviewed and approved which may involve some amendments, additions, or deletions to the minutes as set forth above. - 16 - 7/12/83