Loading...
11-22-77 NOVEMBER. 22., 1977 A Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, was held in the Council Chambers at 7:03 P.M., Tuesday, November 22, 1977, with Mayor James H. Scheifley presiding, and City Manager J. Eldon Mariott, City Attorney Roger Saberson and Council members Robert D. Chapin, David E. Randolph, Aaron I. Sanson, IV, and Leon M. Weekes, present. The Lord's Prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America were recited in unison. Mayor Scheifley stated the Special Meeting was called for the purpose of holding a second public hearing on the rezoning of real property in the City of Delray Beach and implementation of the City's Land Use Plan Map adopted June 27, 1977, amending the Zoning Code and by adopting the new official Zoning Map. The City Manager presented Ordinance No. 75-77. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO THE MUNICIPAL HOME RULE POWERS ACT, SECTION 166.041(3) (c) 2, LAWS OF FLORIDA 1977, CHAPTER 77-331, REZONING 74 PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, IN IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH MASTER LAND USE PLAN MAP, ADOPTED JUNE 27, 1977; AMENDING SECTION 29-2A OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH BY ADOPTING A NEW OFFICIAL ZONIN~ MAP; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (Copy of Ordinance No. 75-77 is on file in the official Ordinance Book.) The City Manager read the caption of the ordinance. A public hearing was held having been legally advertised in compliance with the laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the City of.Delray Beach, Florida. Mayor Scheifley called on Frank Carey, Chairman of the Plan- ning & Zoning Board, to summarize and bring the Council up to date. Mr. Carey stated that at the first Public Hearing on November 8, 1977, the N.E. Quadrant was discussed and of the 22 parcels up for rezoning, only one was challenged - Parcel ~55. It was the decision of Council to sustain the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Board regarding this parcel. In the S.E. Quadrant there were a number of challenges and not all have been resolved. Mr. Carey reported that from his records Parcel ~22 was referred back to the Planning & Zoning Board; Parcel ~23 - Council overruled the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Board; Parcels~17, ~19, and ~27 were sustained; Parcel ~25a - tabled; 948, ~48a and ~48b were sustained; and Parcels ~29, ~30 and ~31 were tabled. Discussion ensued as to changing the configuration on Parcel ~48. Mr. Weekes moved to extend the north/south line of Parcel ~48 down Salina Avenue to Miramar Drive leaving that portion to the east of Miramar in the present Limited Commercial classification, seconded by Mr. Sanson. Upon roll call, Council voted as follows: Mr. Chapin - No; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mr. Sanson - Yes; Mr. Weekes - Yes; Mayor Scheifley - No. The motion carried with a 3 to 2 vote. Before roll call on Parcel ~48 Mayor Scheifley advised that he would like to make a matter of record the letter of Mr. Neil MacMillan dated November 21, 1977; also the letter from Mr. Matt Gracey dated November 18, 1977. A letter from Paul Walton Ledridge dated November 22, 1977, was read into the record. Mr. Carey stated that several parcels were referred back to the Planning & Zoning Board and a special hearing was held on these on Novem- ber 15, 1977, at 8:00 A.M. In regard to Parcel ~22 on Florida Boulevard, the Planning & Zoning Board discussed the use of the property, the struc- tures on the property and the development of the property in the surround- ing area. The Board felt that the zoning on this parcel should be split, i.e., the area south of Avenue E should be Specialized Commercial as it is currently zoned and the area to the north of Avenue E should remain at its present zoning classification RM-15. After discussion with the City Attorney regarding the legal ob- jectives involved, Mr. Chapin moved to sustain the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Board that this parcel be split. The motion died for lack of a second. After discussion among Council for clarification, Mr. Chapin again moved to sustain the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Board for the split zoning on Parcel ~22, seconded by Mr. Sanson. Upon roll call, Council voted as follows: Mr. Chapin - Yes; Mr. Ran- dolph - No; Mr. Sanson - Yes; Mr. Weekes - No; Mayor Scheifley - Yes. The motion passed with a 3 to 2 vote. Before roll call the following discussion was had: Mr. Robert Fellows, attorney, Delray Beach, stated this property was purchased and annexed for the specific purpose of operating a Buick dealership and additional property was purchased for anticipated expansion. The re- zoning of this property in 1972 from Commercial to RM-15 has affected the long term lease between Kengle Realty, owners of the property, and Ralph Buick, the lessee. If the zoning is not changed back to commercial · it is contrary to the recommendations of the consultant, the Planning & Zoning Board and the Land Use Plan and will affect the terms of a long term lease and the security of a mortgage. The City Attorney advised that regarding the proof required if this went to trial, the court would take into account the recommenda- tions of the staff, the Planning & Zoning Board, Planning Department and the consultant, and this would be very important at the hearing. Marion MacLeod, 2717 Florida Boulevard, Chairman of the Tropic Bay Zoning Survey Committee, spoke asking Council to retain the multiple family zoning on the entire Parcel ~22 and protect the balance of Florida Boulevard. As regards Parcels ~29, ~30, ~31 & ~32, under the ownership of - Mr. John K. Brennan, Mr. Carey stated that these parcels were reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Board at the November 15th meeting. The de- cision of the Board was to leave Parcel ~32 as originally recommended which is a change from Specialized Commercial to Community Commercial. On Parcel ~29 the Board's recommendation is that instead of moving from RM-15 to PRD-10 it be to RM-10 (density would be exactly the same). On Parcels ~30 and ~31 and the 65 acres to the south of Parcel ~31 and west of Parcel ~30, Mr. Brennan requested that they be rezoned PRD-4. The net effect of changing the zoning in Parcel ~29 and the changes on Parcels ~30 and ~31 and the single family area of 65 acres is a net re- duction of 90 units. - 2 - 11/22/77 117 Mr. Chapin moved that with regard to Parcels ~29, ~30, and ~31, they be deleted from this ordinance and referred back to the Planning & Zoning Board for the purpose of conducting public hearings for rezoning for purposes other than those advertised in this ordinance, seconded by Mr. Randolph. Upon roll call, Council voted as follows: Mr. Chapin - Yes~ Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mr. Sanson - Yes; Mr. Weekes - Yes; Mayor Scheifley - Yes. The motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. Mr. Carey stated that as regards Parcel ~25a, the area on A1A at DelHaven Drive near the 12th Avenue Bridge, it was the concensus of the Board that the area South of DelHaven on A-1-A should remain at RM-15 and that the area North of DelHaven be changed to R-1AA classification. Mr. Sanson moved to sustain the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Board with regard to Parcel ~25a, seconded by Mr. Weekes. Upon roll call, Council voted as follows: Mr. Chapin - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mr. Sanson - Yes; Mr. Weekes - Yes; Mayor Scheifley - Yes. The motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. Regarding Parcel ~21, The Mackle property at Tropic Bay, Mr. Carey advised that although Parcel ~21 is not recorded on the original site plan, it is represented in every other legal document. Mr. Mackle has requested that he be given a RM-6 zoning classification and the Board so concurs. Mr. Weekes moved to accept the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Board and refer it back to them for public hearing and resubmission, seconded by Mr. Chapin. Upon roll call, Council voted as follows: Mr. Chapin - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mr. Sanson - Yes; Mr. Weekes - Yes; Mayor Scheifley - Yes. The motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. Mayor Scheifley requested that the letter from Monroe Gelb, Attorney, dated November 21, 1977, to the City of Delray Beach, regarding Part of Lot 9, Section 32-46-43 be made part of the record. John and Yolanda'Hardy, 3030 Jasmine Terrace, advised they own three lots on Florida Boulevard, have asked for City water and sewer and wonder why they cannot be annexed at this time. Dan Kotulla, Planning Director, advised that the Hardy property is not contiguous to the city and is not eligible for annexation. Mr. Hardy was advised to contact the City Manager's office regarding this request. Robert A. Green, 1310 N.Wo 2nd Avenue, spoke from the audience concerning his property, Lots 1-10, Block 4, Southridge Subdivision, which he stated is not a specific item on the agenda. Mr. Green presented a brief history of the acquisition and use of his property which was zoned commercial at the time of purchase and which has consequently been changed to Residential Single Family. Mr. Green was advised to follow proper procedure and file a petition for rezoning in this case. Ernest G. Simon, Attorney, spoke regarding Parcel ~45, which is proposed to be changed from RM-15 to RM-10. Mr. Simon gave a brief history of the area, the usage of the surrounding properties and expressed his opposition to the proposed rezoning. Mr. Chapin moved to sustain the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Board with regard to Parcel ~45, seconded by Mr. Sanson. Upon roll call, Council voted as follows: Mr. Chapin - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mr. Sanson - Yes; Mr. Weekes - No; Mayor Scheifley - Yes. The motion passed with a 4 to 1 vote. - 3 - 11/22/77 118 Edward Tier±g, 16300 S.W. 184th Street, Homestead, Florida, spoke in reference to Parcels~35, ~36 and ~37. Mr. Tietig owns 39 lots which comprise approximately 8~ of Parcel ~35, and opposed the rezoning of this Parcel from RN-15 to P~4-6, because it would work quite a hardship and would keep him from building something of quality. Mr. Tietig stated he is surrounded on three sides with either industrial or more liberal zoning. The piece on the north, Parcel ~36 where Stewart Arms is located, has been proposed to be rezoned from RM-15 to RM-10 and it is already built at RM-15. Regarding Parcel ~37, this is the only piece of land the City is trying to give a more liberal zoning - from R-lA to RM-10, and is where the proposed Public Works facility is planned to be built. Following discussion with the Chairman of the Planning & Zoning Board and the Planning Director, the following motions were made: Mr. Weekes moved that Parcel ~37 remain as presently zoned R-lA, seconded by Mr. Chapin. Upon roll call, Council voted as follows: Mr. Chapin - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mr. Sanson - Yes; Mr. Weekes - Yes; Mayor Scheifley - Yes. The motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. Mr. Weekes moved to leave Parcel ~36 at RM-15, seconded by Mr. Randolph. Upon roll call Council voted as follows: Mr. Chapin - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mr. Sanson - Yes; Mr. Weekes - Yes; Mayor Scheifley - Yes. The motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. Mr. Randolph moved that Parcel ~35 be rezoned from RM-15 to RM-10 in deference to the Plann%ng & Zoning Board recommendation of RM-6 and that it be referred back to the Planning & Zoning Board for considera- tion of RM-10 and for Public Hearing and proper advertising, seconded by Mr. Weekes. Mr. Randolph and Mr. Weekes accepted the amendment to the motion that on the eastern portion of the parcel, Mr. Tietig would accept RM-6 Zoning. Upon roll call, Council voted as follows: Mr. Chapin - No; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mr. Sanson - Yes; Mr. Weekes - Yes; Mayor Scheifley - · No. The motion carried with a 3 to 2 vote. Ken Ellingsworth, 15 N.W. 15th Street, spoke concerning the area bounded on the east by the F.E.C. Railroad, on the west by S.E. 1st Avenue, on the North by S.E. 2nd Street, and on the south by S.E. 3rd Street, which was determined to be in Parcel ~45, proposed to be changed from RM-15 to RM-10. Mr. Ellingsworth requested a commercial zoning which is different from anything advertised. It is noted that the electric power in City Hall went off at 9:14 P.M. and resumed operation at 9:26 P.M. Mr. Elligsworth explained that this is an area where from the railroad track west approximately 300 feet, 150 feet of that is now zoned commercial. This leaves a triangular piece 150 feet on the north and approximately 300 feet deep that is zoned RM-15. There is commercial on the north, south and east and multiple family across the street on the west. He stated he does not see why there should be a little sliver of land zoned RM-15 that measures 150 feet on one side and 300 feet deep ending in a triangle and feels it should be examined. Mr. Weekes moved that the Planning & Zoning Board consider the property which Mr. Ellingworth alluded to and report back to Council with their recommendation, as to possibly zoning it commercial, seconded by Mr. Chapin. Upon roll call, Council voted as follows: Mr. Chapin - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mr. Sanson - Yes; Mr. Weekes - Yes; Mayor Schiefley Yes. The motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. Mayor Scheifley advised Council will now consider parcels in the N.W. Quadrant. - 4 - 11/22/77 119 Melvin Muroff, 2020 N.E. 163rd Street, N. Miami Beach, Florida, representing the owner of Parcel ~1 which is some 50 acres at the northeast corner of Lake-Ida Road and Congress Avenue, proposed to be changed from RM-15 to RM-10. He advised this property is bordered on the north by the City's sewer plant, 1-95 has been opened with increased traffic to the east, and he opposed the low density on this property. After discussion, Mr. Chapin moved that the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Board be sustained as to Parcel ~1, seconded by Mr. Sanson. Upon roll call, Council voted as follows: Mr. Chapin - Yes~ Mr. Randolph - No; Mr. Sanson - Yes; Mr. Weekes - No; Mayor Scheifley - Yes. The motion passed sith a 3 to 2 vote. Before roll call, the following discussion was had. Mr. Randolph stated he felt there should be some type of buffer zone at the northern edge of Parcel ~1 because of the sewer plant going in at that location. He suggested that perhaps that particular area should stay at the RM-15 classification. Mr. James W. Nowlin, Jr., Attorney, 3860 Lone Pine Road, Delray Beach, spoke concerning Parcels ~2 and ~3, stating he has no objection to the proposed change on Parcel ~2 from RM-15 to PRD-7~ however, he would like it to be a matter of record that the residents of Lone Pine Road have two interests in that particular parcel. One is the existence of 33rd Way South, which is a public road, and the other is a 175 foot buffer zone which lies to the immediate west of the property. Mr. Nowlin advised that this buffer zone was as a result of a Declaration of Restric- tion which Mr. Muroff recorded back in 1972 when he first came into the City. As to Parcel ~3 - when it was zoned as R-1AAA, it was designed as a~buffer zone in addition to the 175 foot strip that was previously discussed. Richard Siemens, 880 N.E. 3rd Street, Boca Raton, Florida, spoke concerning Parcel ~2, noting that he has a contract to purchase this ~parcel. He stated that he feels it is justifiable for the protection of the residents of Lone Pine Road in the interim for Parcel ~3 to stay as R-1AAA. .Mr. Chapin moved that Parcel ~3 remain single family (R-iAAA) and not be rezoned to PRD-7, seconded by Mr. Sanson. Upon roll call, Council voted as follows: Mr. Chapin - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes: Mr. Sanson - Yes; Mr. Weekes - Yes; Mayor Scheifley - Yes. The motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. Mayor Scheifley advised that consideration will now be given to Parcels in the S.W. Quadrant. William Boos, Attorney, West Palm Beach, Florida, representing Thelma T. Paulsen, owner of 3.9 acres at the S.E. intersection of Congress Avenue and Lowson Boulevard, Parcel ~8, presented a rendering of the Sherwood Park Plaza complex. The present zoning on this parcel is Light Industrial and proposed zoning is Neighborhood Commercial. Mr. Boos stated the nine enumerated uses in the NC zoning would only occupy 7500 square feet, leaving a deficit of 3300 square feet for the existing facility. and would not recognize the very obvious commercial expansion capability that they have. Mr. Carey stated they cannot go to a CC classification as the minimum acreage allowed is four; going to a LC, GC or Sq classification, unless they confine themselves to the uses permitted, there is not a great deal of site plan control the City will have over that property. - 5 - 11/22/77 Mr. Sanson stated that the problem is unique, somewhat similar to Mr. John Brennan's property where, with a little bit of conversation, perhaps a solution could be worked out to everyone's satisfaction. The owner has indicated that'basically all they want is consideration of a few additional uses to either be added to NC or they need another commer- cial designation but are not asking for General or Specialized; they would be very satisfied with the Limited Commercial. Mr. Chapin stated that it would be his preference to rezone to NC with an explicit understanding that some Of the uses might be broadened if that doesn't place the entire ordinance in jeopardy as it relates to our total zoning code. Mr. Chapin suggested that perhaps the petitioner would feel more comfortable with a Special Activities District employing site plan development for commercial uses; that is, something that is coming in the future. Mr. Weekes stated that if Council chose to do so, they could zone the property LC; suggesting that perhaps Council could enter into an agreement with the developer and the attorney that they would submit voluntarily to the site plan procedure if Council granted LC zoning. The City Attorney advised that nothing that could be done here tonight can be done to satisfy the property owner and apparently satisfy what Council members would like to do. At this point, it seems to be a question of whether or not the Council is going to proceed and rezone this NC or whether or not Council will remove it from consideration in the ordinance and send it back ~o Planning & Zoning Board for considera- tion of some sort of use adjustment and possibly adding a site plan review. The City Attorney advised he would prefer to see it go through in the Planned Commercial type district discussed before rather than going through with the Limited Commercial and an independent commitment for site plan review. Following discussion, Mr. Chapin moved to remove Parcel ~8 from this ordinance and refer it back to the Planning & Zoning Board for further study specifically; (a) possibility of special commercial exception type of ordinance or (b) amendment of preamble of the LC district to arrive at a fair and equitable solution for this parcel, seconded by Mr. Weekes. Upon roll call, Council voted as follows: Mr. Chapin - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mr. Weekes - Yes; Mayor Scheifley - Yes. Mr. Sanson abstained because of a potential conflict of interest. The motion passed with a 4 to 0 vote. Kay Larche, 5190 Garfield Road, read a statement from the League of Women Voters of South Palm Beach County commending the City Council for their prompt and timely implementation of the Land Use Plan. Mayor Scheifley asked if it had been determined where the property was mentioned in a letter to Council dated November 21, 1977, from Monroe - Gelv, Attorney, described as in Section 32-46-43, Part of Lot 9. Mr. Kotulla advised he believed it to be the Tropic Isle Harbor Shopping Center. Mayor Scheifley advised that this letter be made a part of the record. City Attorney Saberson stated that he wanted the record to reflect that the writer of that letter did not sufficiently identify the property he was referring to so that proper consideration could be given to the letter and comments. Mr. Randolph suggested that the City should reply to this individual stating that he did not give proper identification to protect the interest of this City and the city Attorney was so advised. Elaine Roberts, 312 N. Swinton Avenue, spoke regarding Parcel ~55 in opposition to the proposed rezoning from RM-15 to R-lA, asking for consideration of a RM-6 classification to enable her to add an additional unit to her property. Following discussion, Mr. Weekes moved to extend the line which would be the westerly line of Parcel $53 through Parcel $55 northerly to the church property where it will stop; the property lying east of - 6 - 11/22/77 121 that line will be RM-6 and the property 'lying to the west of that line will be R-lA, seconded by Mr. Sanson. The City Attorney stated he felt it would be appropriate for the property lying east to be removed from the ordinance and to be sent back to the Planning & Zoning Board for further hearing'and public notice. Mr. Weekes and Mr. Sanson accepted this amendment to the motion. Upon roll call, Council voted as follows: Mr. Chapin - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mr. Sanson - Yes; Mr. Weekes - Yes; Mayor Scheifley - No. The motion passed with a 4 to 1 vote. Mr. Sanson questioned Parcel ~16, a small piece of property located at the northeast corner of Lindell Boulevard and Dixie Highway which is at the entrance to Tropic Palms and consists of a gas station, garage, and used car lot. Mr. Kotulla stated that the owners have sub- mitted an application for rezoning and a public hearing will be coming up next month - RM-10 to SC to allow them to make extensive renovations on this property. The Public Hearing was closed. The City Attorney stated he would like to go back and recap to make sure everyone is in agreement with what is being removed and what is going back to the Planning & Zoning Board. The ordinance will be adopted tonight with the amendments that Council has agreed upon during the process and that will conclude this ordinance. Those parcels for which a change is in order will_come Rack up through the normal process of a rezoning from the Planning & Zoning Board to Council and Council will pass separate ordinances for those zoning changes if so made. The recap was presented as follows: Parcel ~48 - a vertical line would be drawn - Salina Avenue 'from Miramar Drive on the South to the northern boundary of Parcel ~48; all the property East of that line is to remain LC; the west is to remain as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Board (RM-15). Parcel ~22 - North half shall remain RM-15; the south half to be changed to SC in accordance with the advertisement; district boundary line would be in the middle of Avenue Eo Parcels ~29, ~30 and ~31 - are to be removed from consideration with this ordinance and referred back to the Planning & Zoning Board for consideration of changes of zoning on those parcels as follows: Parcel ~29 RM-15 - RM-10; Parcel ~30 - RM-15 to PRD-4; Parcel ~31 - RM15 to PRD-4: plus the 65 acres not part of this ordinance. Parcel ~25a - south of Del Haven Drive (district boundary is the middle of the street) is to remain RM-15 to the southern boundary of ~25a and from the middle of Del Haven to the north boundary line of ~25a is to be changed in accordance with the recommendation to R-1AA. Parcel ~21 - being removed from consideration as part of the ordinance and being referred back to the Planning & Zoning for con- sideration of possible RM-6 zoning. Parcel ~37 - remain as presently zoned R-lA. Parcel ~36 - remain RM-15 as presently zoned. - 7 - 11/22/77 Parcel ~35 - remove from consideration - small part of the eastern section of that would be rezoned to RM-6 and the remainder would be re- zoned to RM-10; dividing line to run in a north/south direction on the easterly street in Parcel ~35 from the northern boundary of ~35 to the southern bounday; everything east of that is to be zoned RM-6 in accord- ance with the advertisement. Everything west of that line is to be removed from consideration of this ordinance and referred back to Planning & Zoning Board for consideration of RM-10 zoning. Parcel ~3 - remain in the current R-1AAA zoning. Parcel ~8 - removed from consideration from this ordinance and referred back to the Planning & Zoning Board to consider various alterna- tives with regard to limiting or adding to the possible commercial uses that would be permitted in NC and also explore the possibility of site - development plan approval for commercial districts. Parcel ~55 - extend the westward line of Parcel 53 northerly into 55 to a point that would end at the existing church property; to then extend that east to the eastern boundary of ~55 and soUth to the southern boundary of ~55 and back again west to what would be the westerly boundary line of ~53; the property lying to the east would be removed and referred back to the Planning & Zoning Board for consideration of possible RM-6 zoning; remainder of ~55 to be rezoned as advertised - R-lA. Parcel ~23 - remain RM-15. Parcel ~47 - small piec~ of Parcel ~47 removed from consideration; east boundary is the Intracoastal Waterway; south is Barr Apartments; north - S.E. 5th Street and the west boundary is unnamed emergency exit easement - remain RM-10. Mr. Chapin moved to adopt Ordinance No. 75-77 on second and final .reading with the changes as outlined by the City Attorney and further that the Zoning Map be amended to incorporate the changes being brought about by this rezoning, City Planning Director and as approved by City Council, seconded by Mr. Weekes. Upon roll call, Council voted as follows: Mr. Chapin - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mr. Sanson - Yes; Mr. Weekes - Yes; Mayor Scheifley - Yes. The motion was passed with a 5 to 0 vote. Mr. Weekes moved for the adjournment of the meeting, seconded by Mr. Chapin. Said motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 11:25 P.M. ~he undersigned is the City Clerk of the City of Delray Beach and that the information provided herein is the minutes of the meeting Of said City Council of November 22, 1977, which minutes were formally approved and adopted by the City Council on.~_c~_~_~.~.~ /.~,, /9'7 ~ · ~/ City Clerk NOTE TO READER: If the minutes that you have received are not completed as indicated above, then this means that these are not the official minutes of the City Council. They will be- come the official minutes only after they have been reviewed and approved which may involve some amendments, additions, or deletions to the minutes as set forth abova. - 8 - 11/22/77.