The URL can be used to link to this page

Ord 14-99 ORDINANCE NO. 14-99 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, ADOPTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE "LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION ACT", FLORIDA STATUTES SECTIONS 163.3161 THROUGH 163.3243, INCI,USIVE; _AT J, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" ENTITLED "COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1" AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE, A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Delray Beach exercised the authority granted pursuant to the provisions of Florida Statutes Sections 163.3161 through 163.3243, known as the "Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Developmcnt Regulation Act"; and WHEREAS, via Ordinance No. 82-89, the City Commission adopted the document entitled "Comprehensive Plan - Delray Beach, Florida"; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board, as Local Planning Agency, did prepare an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan entided "Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1 "; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board, as Local Planning Agency, following due public notice, held a public hearing on March 15, 1999, in accordance with the requirements of the "Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act"; and WHEREAS, after the above referenced public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Board, as Local Planning Agency, recommended to the City Commission that the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1 be transmitted; and WHEREAS, proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1 was submitted to and reviewed by the City- Commission; and WHEREAS, following due public notice, the first of two required public hearings on Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1 was held by the City Commission on April 20, 1999, at which time it was authorized to be transmitted to the Department of Community Affairs for required review; and WHEREAS, a report of Objections, Recommendations and Comments (ORC) has been received from the State Depastment of Community Affairs and said report has been reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Board, as Local Planning Agency; and WHEREAS, following due public notice, the second of two required public hearings on Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1 was held on October 19, 1999, in accordance with statutory requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the Ci.ty Commission of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, hereby declares its intent to exercise the authority granted pursuant to the provisions of Florida Statutes Sections 163.3161 through 163.3243, inclusive, known as the "Local Government Planning and Land Development Regulation Act". Section 2. That in implementation of its declared intent as set forth in Section 1 of this ordinance, there is hereby adopted the document entitled "Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1", which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3. That the document entitled "Comprehensive Plan - Delray Beach, Florida" is hereby amended pursuant to the document entitled "Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1". Section 4. That should any section or provision of this ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence or word be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. Section 5. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances which are in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 6. That this ordinance shall become effective upon the date a final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs finding the amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Chapter 163.3184, F.S., or the date a final order is issued by the Administration Commission finding the amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Chapter 163.3184, F.S. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final reading on this the 19th day of October, 1999. ATI'EST: City Clerk ! First Reading /kpr±l 20, 1999 (gransmJ_ttal Hear±nc.i) SecondReadmg October 19, 1999 (3,dopt±on -2- Ord. No. 14-99 ORDINANCE NUMBER 14-99, PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Page FUTURE ~ND USE ELEMENT 3 Policy C-2.1 (Redevelopment Areas) 3 General Commercial Futura Land Use Description 4 Conse~ation Future Land Use Description 4 LarGe Scale Mixed Use Description 5 Table L-7(Land Use DesiGnation Matrix) 5 Policy A-~ .7 (Amendments to FLUM) 6 Policy A-5.6 ( LDR amendment to the General Commercial zoning district ) AMENDMENTS TO THE FUTURE ~ND USE MAP 6 Delray Oaks Prese~e 7 Delray's Lost Drive-in CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT 7 Table CI-ClP (Five Year Capital Improvement Schedule) HOUSING ELEMENT 7 Policy A-12.4 (LDR Amendments Re: LarGe Homes) CONSERVATION ELEMENT 8 Needs and Recommendations 9 Policy B-1.3 (Leon Weekes) Page 1 ORDINANCE NUMBER 14-99, PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 Page TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 9 Table T-1 (Street Network Classification) 10 Map# 20 (2015 Operating Conditions) 10 Map# 21 (2015 Cost Feasible Plan) 10 Objective A-4 (Ultimate Right-of-Way needs) SUPPORT DOCUMENTS Appendix 1 Redevelopment Areas staff report 2 Mixed Use Land Use staff report 3 Five Year Schedule of Capital Improvements 4 FDOT analysis of Federal Highway 5 Table T-1 (Street Network Classifications) 6 Map Exhibit #20 (2015 Operating Conditions) 7 Map Exhibit #21 (2015 Cost Feasible Plan) 10 Density in GC Land Use category & W. Atlantic Overlay District FLUM Amendments: 8 Delray Oaks FLUM Amendment staff report 9 Delray's Lost Drive-In FLUM Amendment staff report Page 2 ORDINANCE NUMBER 14-99, PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT 1) Location: Pg. FL-32, Policy C-2.1, (Redevelopment Areas) Changes center on deletion of the requirement that a redevelopment plan be adopted prior to the expenditure of public funds for infrastructure. See Support Documents #1 (Redevelopment Areas memorandum staff report) for a complete discussion of this item. 2) Location: Pg. FL-42, (General Commercial Future Land Use Description) General Commercial: This designation is applied to land, which is, or should be, developed for general commercial purposes e.g. retail, office, services. Light industrial type uses such as fabrication and assembly are permissible under this designation when located in the special overlay district between Federal Highway and Dixie Highway, north of N.E. 14th Street to the north City limit. Residential uses, unless they are in conjunction with a commercial use, are not permissible on land shown as General Commercial on the Future Land Use Map. Change: REVISION General Commercial: This designation is applied to land which is, or should be, developed for general commercial purposes e.g. retail, office, services. Light industrial type uses such as fabrication and assembly are permissible under this designation when located in the special oveday district between Federal Highway and Dixie Highway, north of N.E. 14th Street to the north City limit. A maximum Floor Area Ratio of 3.0 is permitted for nonresidential uses. D~o~,.,;.~, ........ '~o~- ,~,,,,, -~,,, i,, r, ...... ~'~' ~"~ *~'~ ~"* .... ' '~"'~ "~'~ ~ Residential uses may comprise up to of 50% of the total floor area within the West Atlantic Redevelopment Area (GC Overlay), and up to 15% of the total floor area elsewhere in the City with a GC FLUM designation. Residential uses are permitted either in conjunction with a commercial use, or as a stand alone use subie=t to Conditional Use approval. Residential density is limited to a maximum of 12 dwelling units per acre, except within the West Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Area Overlay where the density may exceed 12 units per acre, up to a maximum of 30 units per acre subject to Conditional Use approval. Comment: The statement being eliminated is currently inconsistent with the Land Development Regulations which allows stand alone residential developments as Page 3 ORDINANCE NUMBER 14-99, PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 conditional uses within General and Planned Commercial zoning districts. Both of these zoning districts are listed as consistent with the General Commercial Land Use Map designation, and create a conflict with respect to residential uses. Residential densities are limited to 12 units per acre in the General Commercial land use categories. The language relating to increases above 12 units per acre in the West Atlantic Avenue Overlay is being added at the request of the Community Redevelopment Agency. The maximum residential and commercial intensities and density along with maximum residential percentages are being added to address DCA's ORC comments. See Support Document #10 for complete discussion on densities within the West Atlantic Overlay District. 3) Location: Pg. FL-42 (Conservation Future Land Use Description) CONSERVATION LAND USE: This designation applies to those specific properties identified in the Conservation Element as land to be preserved. No other land use is appropriate. These properties shall be either placed into public ownership or developed only as allowed by policies of the Conservation Element. They are shown on the Future Land Use Map under the Recreational and Open Space designation. Change: REVISION CONSERVATION LAND USE: This designation aPplies to those specific properties identified in the Conservation Element as land to be preserved. No other land use is appropriate. These properties shall be either placed into public ownership or developed only as allowed by policies of the Conservation Element. They are shown on the Future Land Use Map under the Recr~at!_'cna! and Open Space-Conservation designation. Properties having an Open Space-Conservation designation will be developed with an intensity consistent with the policies contained within Objective B-1 of the Conservation Element. Comment: The Recreation and Open Space land use designation allows for more active recreational use of an area which may be inconsistent with the conservation of the land. It is noted the Open Space-Conservation land use designation is consistent with zoning designations which allow passive use such as hiking trails and passive Parks. 4) Location: Pg. FL-43, (Large Scale Mixed Use Description) Changes involve eliminating the Large Scale Mixed Use Land use category. After the modification proposed for the Lost Delray Drive-In (removal of the Large-Scale category) no other property will have that designation. Further, there are no other properties in the City or in the City's Planning Area which are appropriate for this designation. See Support Documents #2 ( Mixed Use Future Land Use categories memorandum staff report) for a complete discussion of this item. Page 4 ORDINANCE NUMBER 14-99, PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 5) Location: Pg. FL-45,Table L-7 The table is being modified to eliminate the Large Scale Mixed Use Land Use category from the land Use matrix. The current amendment includes a land use amendment removing the Large-Scale designation for the last parcel in the City and includes elimination of the text description of the category. See Support Documents #2 (Mixed Use Land Use Categories Staff Report) for a complete discussion and revised table. 6) Location: Pg. FL-23, Policy A-1.7 Policy A-1.7 Amendments to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) must be based upon the following findings: [] Demonstrated Need - That there is a need for the requested land use. The need must be based upon circumstances such as shifts in demographic trends, changes in the availability of land, changes in the existing character and FLUM designations of the surrounding area, fulfillment of a comprehensive plan objective or policy, or similar circumstances. The need must be supported by data and analysis. This policy shall not apply to requests for the FLUM designations of Conservation or Recreation and Open Space [] Consistency - The requested designation is consistent with goals, objectives, and policies of the most recently adopted Comprehensive Plan. [] Concurrency - Development at the highest intensity possible under the requested designation can meet the adopted concurrency standards. [] Compatibility- The requested designation will be compatible with existing and future land uses of the surrounding area. [] Compliance - Development under the requested designation will comply with the provisions and requirement of the Land Development Regulations. Change: REVISION Policy A-1.7 Amendments to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) must be based upon the fc!!~,.~.,!~2 findings;--listed below, and must be supported by data and analysis that demonstrate compliance with these findings: Demonstrated Need - That there is a need for the requested land use. The need must be based upon circumstances such as shifts in demographic trends, changes in the availability of land, changes in the existing character and FLUM designations Page 5 ORDINANCE NUMBER 14-99, PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 of the surrounding area, fulfillment of a comprehensive plan objective or policy, annexation into the municipal boundaries, or similar circumstances. The need must be supported by data and analysis verifying the changing demographics or other circumstances. This pc!!c¥ requirement shall not apply to requests for the FLUM designations of Conservation or Recreation and Open Space; nor shall it apply to FLUM changes associated with annexations when the City's advisory FLUM designation is being applied, or when the requested designation is of a similar intensity to the advisory designation. However, the findings described in the remainder of this policy must be addressed with all FLUM amendments. [] Consistency - The requested designation is consistent with goals, objectives, and policies of the most recently adopted Comprehensive Plan. r-, Concurrency - Development at the highest intensity possible under the requested designation can meet the adopted concurrency standards. ~ Compatibility- The requested designation will be compatible with existing and future land uses of the surrounding area. ~ Compliance - Development under the requested designation will comply with the provisions and requirements of the Land Development Regulations. Comment: The City has applied advisory land use designations to areas in the City's Future Annexation Area. These designations were selected given the existing character and FLUM designations of the surrounding areas. Therefore, in most cases when annexations include the application of the advisory designations or designations of similar intensity demonstrated need has been previously established. 7) Location: Pg. FL-26, New Policy A-5,6 Change: NEW POLICY Policy A-5.6 The City shall amend the General Commercial (GC) zoning district to accommodate increased multiple family densities over 12 units per acre, but not to exceed a maximum of 30 units per acre as a Conditional Use in the West Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Area Oveday. Comment: See Support Document #10 (Densities within the General Commercial Land Use category and the West Atlantic Oveday District) and the response to the ORC report for a complete discussion of this item. AMENDMENTS TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP Delray Oaks: A City initiated change to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) for the 24.52 acre Delray Oaks Preserve. The request involves a FLUM amendment from TRN (Transitional) to OS-C (Open Space- Conservation). Page 6 ORDINANCE NUMBER 14-99, PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 See Support Document #8 (Delray Oaks FLUM amendment) for a complete discussion of this item. Delray's Lost Drive-In: A City initiated change to the Future Land Use Map for four unplatted parcels (7 acres) known as the Delray's Lost Drive-In. The request involves a FLUM Change deleting the Large-Scale Mixed Use overlay. See Support Document #9 (Delray's Lost Drive-In FLUM Amendment) for a complete discussion of this item. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT: 1) Location: Pg. CI 28-30 (5-Year Capital Improvement Schedule) Changes involve modifying the Five-Year schedule of capital improvements to reflect changes associated with the adoption of the 1999/00 Capital Improvement Budget. The changes involve deletion of projects completed in the previous years and addition of new projects, elimination of projects or expenditures no longer desired, and prioritization of current and new projects. See Support Document #3 (Five Year Schedule of Capital Improvements) for the completed table. HOUSING ELEMENT 1) Location: Pg. HO-34, Policy A-12.4 (Large Homes) PolicyA-12.4 In order to help preserve the character and scale of the City's neighborhoods, measures shall be taken to mitigate the impacts of the "mansionization trend. In FY 97/98, the City shall adopt regulations to limit the size and scale of new homes in order to ensure that they are compatible with the City's existing, older housing stock. The City will provide planning and technical assistance to implement neighborhood-supported initiatives aimed at preserving the character of existing residential areas. Such assistance may involve the formulation of regulations that would limit the size and scale of new homes to be consistent with existing structures within a defined neighborhood, an analysis of the housing inventory to determine if the area qualifies for designation as a historic district, and similar measures. Change: REVISION Policy A-12.4 I,, ,-,,,~,, +,, ~,,,~ ......... +~,,, ,-~, .... + ....,~ o,.o1,~ ,-,~ +~,,, r-;+,,,,. ~-~,~ I~ ~V QT/QQ ~1~ f'~H'~ ~.1.~11 ~,~ ~-~,~,,1~-;~..F,-, I;~,-~H- ~ ~--;~, .-,~ ~'--~1~ ~T r~'~,~ ................. ~ ....... .X ......... I~' · --~ ................................... ,- ......................... ~, st_-'c.u.. The City will provide planning and technical assistance to implement Page 7 ORDINANCE NUMBER 14-99, PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 neighborhood-supported initiatives aimed at preserving the character of existing residential areas. Such assistance may involve the formulation of regulations that would limit the size and scale of new homes to be consistent with existing structures within a defined neighborhood, an analysis of the housing inventory to determine if the area qualifies for designation as a historic district, and similar measures. Comment: An ordinance regulating the size and scale of homes failed to pass in 1997. The issue was referred back to the Planning staff and a planning consultant for additional review and input. A revised ordinance was considered by the City Commission in November, 1998. After much discussion the Commission voted not to adopt the ordinance. Commission members felt they would rather apply rules to individual neighborhoods, if the majority of residents in those neighborhoods support the regulations. CONSERVATION ELEMENT 1) Location: Pg. CO-8, (Needs and Recommendations) NEEDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Summarizing from the above, the following needs and recommendations are identified in the Conservation Element: Continuation of the beach erosion control program. · Promotion of water quality and weed control improvements in Lake Ida and associated drainage canals. · Continued pursuit of water conservation programs. · Promotion of water conservation through public education. · Development and/or implementation of programs for the preservation of Delray Oaks, the Donnelley Tract, and FIND parcels 645 and 650. · Establishment of an interpretive trail at the Leon Weekes Environmental Preserve. Change: REVISION NEEDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Summarizing from the above, the following needs and recommendations are identified in the Conservation Element: Page 8 ORDINANCE NUMBER 14-99, PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 · Continuation of the beach erosion control program. · Promotion of water quality and weed control improvements in Lake Ida and associated drainage canals. · Continued pursuit of water conservation programs. · Promotion of water conservation through public education. · Development and/or implementation of programs for the preservation of Delray Oaks, the Donneiley Tract, and FiND parcels 645 and 650. Comment: The interpretive trail system is currently under construction, therefore the establishment of the trail is no longer an unmet need. 2) Location: Pg. CO-14, Policy B-1.3 Policy B-1.3 An interpretative trail system shall be created within Leon Weekes Environmental Preserve upon completion of the prescribed burn program currently underway. Change: REVISION Policy B-1.3 ........................... ~ ........ ~ ............. ~ .............. ~, ~ .............. j 'unda~r:y. Deleted by Amendment 99-1. Comment: The interpretive trail system is currently under construction, therefore the policy has been accomplished. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT: 1) Location: Pg. TR-14-18, Table T-l(Street Network Classification) The City desires to decrease the number of lanes on Federal Highway between SE 10th Avenue and Bond Way from 3 lanes in each direction to 2 lanes in each direction. The reduction would accommodate sidewalk widening and streetscape enhancements. Federal Highway is a State road and the request has been reviewed and accepted by FDOT (see support document # 4). The change has been noted on the Palm Beach Metropolitan Planning Organization's Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). The Page 9 ORDINANCE NUMBER 14-99, PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 modification of the City's Comprehensive Plan will achieve consistency between the LRTP and the City's Transportation Element (see support document #5 for revised Table T-1 ). 2) Location: Pg. TR-34, Map #20 (2015 Operating Conditions) As noted above to achieve the desired changes and consistency between the LRTP and the City's Transportation Element modification of the map exhibit is required ( see support document #6 for map exhibit). 3) Location: Pg. TR-35, Map #21 (2015 Cost Feasible Plan) As noted above to achieve the desired changes and consistency between the LRTP and the City's Transportation Element modification of the map exhibit is required ( see support document #7 for map exhibit). 4) Location: Pg. TR-41 Objective A-4 Objective A-4 Ultimate rights-of-way shall be provided per the schedule contained in Table T-4. Setback requirements for new construction along streets shown in Table T-4 shall be measured from the ultimate property line, thus, providing protection of these rights-of- way from building encroachment. Change: Revision Objective A-4 Ultimate rights-of-way shall be provided per the schedule contained in Table :F.-4 T-1. Setback requirements for new construction along streets shown in Table T-4 T-1 shall be measured from the ultimate property line, thus, providing protection of these rights- of-way from building encroachment. Comment: This is a corrective text amendment to properly label the right-of-way map. S:~adv\comp\991pz2 Page 10 SUPPORT DOCUMENT #1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 REDEVELOPMENT AREAS STAFF REPORT PLANNiNG"'AND'ZONI. NGi BOARD,.MEMORANDUMi'STA~F REPORT ':, ~'.'~:; ':.' :i i.. .' MEETING DATE: MARCH 15, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: IV.F.1 -AMENDMENT TO FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT POLICY C-2.1 REGARDING REDEVELOPMENT AREAS. L ?i?iii!,!~ !!i~:!~iil;F ~!i-~i;~i~:~ i.?~i,'-ITEM BEEORE~THE BOARDL .i:;~ii~i:i:....' :' ~... ". The item before the Board is that of making a recommendation to the City Commission regarding an amendment to Future Land Use Element Policies C-2.1, C-2.3, C-2.4, and C-2.6 of the Comprehensive Plan, pursuant to LDR Section 9.2.1 (Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS ~ :,~i':: ~':: ~.: At its meeting of March 2, 1999, the City Commission initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1. At that meeting, the Progressive Residents of Delray (PROD) requested that Future Land Use Element Policy C-2.1, be changed so that unpaved streets within designated redevelopment areas can be paved prior to adoption of a redevelopment plan. Currently, Policy C-2.1 states that "until such time as a redevelopment plan is prepared and adopted for such an area, public investment - in terms of infrastructure - shall be minimal." In order to allow the City more flexibility to address the needs of these areas, it seems appropriate to amend this policy. In addition, the scheduled dates for completion of the plans are being adjusted. iRECO-MME By motion, recommend to the City Commission an amendment to Future Land Use Element Policies C-2.1, C-2.3, C-2.4, and C-2.6 of the Comprehensive Plan. Attachments: Text Changes Request Letter Adoption of the Redevelopment Plan represents Phase I of the redevelopment strategy for the area. Phase II consists of an economic development strategy to be developed by the CRA, based on the Redevelopment Plan, and a market study. The economic development strategy will be completed by Fiscal Year 97/98. Policy C-1.6 The following pertains to the redevelopment of the Silver Terrace Area: This area involves the old Silver Terrace Subdivision which contains some mixed use but is primarily single family. It also involves the adjacent land use of the Floranda Mobile Home Park which is a well maintained land use but which may, in the future, be inappropriate for its location along Federal Highway adjacent to a regional shopping center. The Silver Terrace Redevelopment Plan was adopted by the City Commission on March 5, 1996. The plan establishes Future Land Use Map designations, zonings, and special development standards for the redevelopment area. Future development in the area must be in accordance with the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. Obiective C-2 The City, through its Planning & Zoning Department, shall evaluate the continued need for specific redevelopment plans to address the following geographic areas. The evaluations shall be completed, and recommendations presented to the Planning & Zoning Board by the end of FY 97/98. Should the need for redevelopment plans be demonstrated, they shall be added to the Department's adopted Work Program. Until the evaluation is complete, the policies referring to redevelopment areas will be maintained. 1. Wallace Drive Industrial Area 2. The vicinity of Lindell and Federal Highway 3. 4th Avenue, north of Linton Boulevard 4. Area between S.E. 2nd and S.E. 5th Streets, and Federal Highway to Swinton Avenue (Osceola Park area) ,Policy C-2.1 The areas listed above shall be designated on the Future Land Use Map as "redevelopment areas". · ..~,..4,,-,,.-,.4.~,-4 .F,-,,,- ~., ,~.k .-~,~ .~.~.e ~, ,kll,,-, ;...,,~,,~-4.,-~.,.-,4. ;,-., 4.~,,,..,.~ ~..,.F ;,.'.,'.F,-,-.~.,.i.r, ,~-~, ,r~ *..,k.oll k,.-., mi~im2[ If a private development proposal is made within a redevelopment area prior to the adoption of the redevelopment plan, one of the following options shall be pursued: Acceleration of the redevelopment plan and deferral of the land use request until the plan is completed; or, Consideration of the use request on its own merits with the existing zoning and policies of the Comprehensive Plan guiding the disposition of the request. FL - 32 r,.~,4,~,,,-,:,-,,.,,-~,~,,+ · h,-,,,,~,ve,-' th,-. ,',l-,,-,n;n,-, .-,,-,,4 ;,-~,,-,I,~,-,-,~,,,+oti,',,-, ,-,,~ ~,~,4,-,,,,~l,-,,-,m,~,-,+ ,.,., ..... ~, ....... ~r~, .......... I" ......... ~ ........ t.,i,..,, ,,.. .............. ,.. ....I" ....... Policy C-2.3 The following pertains to the Wallace Drive Industrial Area: This area shall be primarily industrial (LI Zoning) with an emphasis on commerce uses (PCC, MIC zone districts). The City, through its water and sewer capital improvement program, shall install water and sewer mains throughout the area. Unimproved and underimproved rights-of-way shall be abandoned when it facilitates the aggregation of parcels and larger scale development provided that the right-of-way is not essential for traffic flow purposes. Support uses for the existing automobile dealership uses are encouraged. All commercial uses shall be allowed with the exception of "strip-type" development along Wallace Drive which is not desired because of traffic conflicts along this collector street. This redevelopment plan shall be prepared in FY 9819912000 and shall be adopted through a comprehensive plan amendment. Policy C-2.4 The following pertains to the vicinity of Lindell and Federal Highway: This area extends from the C-15 Canal northward between Federal and Dixie Highways. The area does not include the existing (Honda) automobile dealership but does include the mobile home park north of it. Half of the land is vacant, almost half is underutilized as a substandard trailer park, and a few lots have residences upon them. While any commercial use is allowable, the future use of the property is most appropriate for specialized commercial or recreational activities. An effort shall be made to promote aggregation of parcels prior to any further development. This redevelopment plan shall be prepared in FY 8-74889912000 and shall be adopted through a comprehensive plan amendment. Policy C-2.$ The following pertains to the area on both sides of S.W. 4th Avenue, north of Linton Boulevard. This area involves warehouses, heavy industrial use, sporadic residential uses, and vacant land. The vacant land was platted as a part of the Woods of Southridge Subdivision. Residential use is most appropriate for the area west of S.W. 4th Avenue. Industrial and office uses are appropriate east of S.W. 4th Avenue. This redevelopment plan shall be prepared in FY 98~99 and shall be adopted through a comprehensive plan'amendment. Policy C-2.6 The following pertains to the area bounded by S.E. 2nd Street, Federal Highway, S.E. 5th Street, and Swinton Avenue (Osceola Park area): FL - 33 This area has industrial uses with inadequate parking to the west, commercial uses to the east, and a mixed residential area which has turned mainly into renter-occupied units. It is also encompassed by wellfield protection zones. The primary focus of this redevelopment plan shall be to arrest deterioration, provide adequate parking and services for the existing industrial and commercial areas, and accommodate housing which is compatible with the other uses. The issues relating to industrial uses within this area were addressed within the new CDB-RC zoning district, created on May 16, 1995. Therefore, the redevelopment plan for this area will focus on the residential neighborhood. The plan will, at a minimum address the following issues: [] Appropriateness of the existing RM zoning district within the area. [] Use of traffic-calming measures to reduce speed and volume of traffic on the residential streets within the area. [] Potential for creation of a historic district within the area. [] Landscape beautification. [] Improvement of existing housing stock. This redevelopment plan shall be prepared in FY 1~7-/98/99 and shall be adopted through a comprehensive plan arnendment. Obiective C-3 Economic development is an essential component of the redevelopment and renewal efforts which are directed to the future of the City of Delray Beach. Specific efforts for the coordination and provision of economic development activities shall be centered in the City Administration's Development Services Management Group. Those efforts shall be governed by the following policies. Policy C-3.1 The City of Delray Beach hereby acknowledges the role of Culture and the Arts in Economic Development and pledges ;,q pursuit of a theme of this Comprehensive Plan - A Renaissance Community - the promotion of the arts and accommodation of cultural activities for economic development ends. Policy C-3.2 The successful development of the Old School Square Project is the cornerstone to the' rebirth of the economic vitality of the community. To further accommodate this activity, the City shall evaluate the potential for the acquisition of land in the Old School Square area of the City for the purpose of improving public parking and/or creating a linkage between Old School Square and governmental facilities to the west. FL - 34 PROGRESSIVE RESIDENTS OF DELRAY POST OFFICE BOX 1301 DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33447 HOT LINE 561-266-9400 F.4J(: 561-498-8909 Mayor Alperin and City Commissioners Att: Diane Dominguez 0?rlCn~S 1 O0 N.W. 1 st Ave. Delray Beach, Fl. 33444 Jean ~er President Dear Mayor and Commission Members, Bill Schwartz Vice President Progressive Residents of Delray voted at their February Board meeting Jayne King voted to ask the city to change our Comprehensive Plan policy C-2 so that Se~etary the unpaved streets in our city can be paved by the city. The streets may be Gretchen Bacon in a redevelopment area but the probability of any of them being done by a ~:easurer developer are next to non. Eighth .ave and l 1 street and the street off fourth Ave. are partially developed and will attract builders if they are Board Members paved. Why 11 street is partially paved and partially not paved makes no sense at all. The one block on north Frederick off.La Mat is another where llelen Co0persmith the no development will pay for the street. Mr. Columbi owns the square ~.1t. Boo~ind~r block on Federal and has access to three streets now. It is time to bite the bullet and help these people. The areas will improve if the streets are ~rald ~Foe paved. Norman ~laslo~' .again we are formally requesting that the Comprehensive Plan policy be Jo Ann Peart changed as soon as possible. Bill Sch~a,~z. Sincerely, Jean Beer, Pres. SUPPORT DOCUMENT #2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 MIXED USE LAND USE STAFF REPORT PLANNING:ANDi~ZoNING BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: MARCH 15, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: IV.F.1 -AMENDMENT TO FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT REGARDING THE DESCRIPTION OF THE MIXED USE LAND USE CATEGORIES I ''~ ':~ i; i!!?' ii!i~iii il ITEM BEFORETHEiBOARDi~::ii:i;!~!~,::' ~L:,/ ~" " The item before the Board is that of making a recommendation to the City Commission regarding a text amendment to the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan regarding the description of the mixed use land use categories, pursuant to LDR Section 9.2.1 (Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan). I :~::~ '".: ;';;!ii~i!!!!i!i! ~:~ BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: ~ :. 'il ~;:: ~ Large Scale Mixed Use: The large scale mixed use land use designation is an overlay district which was created to provide incentives for redevelopment of properties not located within designated redevelopment areas, and which were to be developed solely by private entities. With the adoption of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map in November 1989, the Large Scale Mixed Use overlay district was adopted and applied to two properties on NoAh Federal Highway - the Kokomo Key townhouse development and the Deiray Swap Shop/Delray's Lost Drive-In. At the time the Comprehensive Plan was being developed in 1988, a mixed use development known as Marina Cay was approved for the property but was not built. In 1995, site plan approval was obtained to construct the Kokomo Key townhouse development, which has been constructed. In 1995, with Comprehensive Plan Amendment 95-1, the Large Scale Mixed Use overlay designation was removed from the Marina Cay/Kokomo Key property, as it was no longer applicable. In 1998, conditional use and site plan approvals were obtained for Delray's Lost Drive-In (fka Delray Swap Shop), and the improvements are currently under construction. With Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1, a separate Future Land Use Map amendment is being processed to remove the Large Scale Mixed Use overlay from the Lost Drive-In property, as it is no longer applicable. Further, the NoAh Federal Highway redevelopment plan has been adopted which calls for mixed use development along Federal Highway, which can be accommodated under the GC (General Commercial) zoning designation. The Large Scale Mixed Use overlay has existed for 10 years without any developer taking advantage of the incentives for increasing the base residential density or the commercial floor area. As the designation was only applied to two properties, which have been developed under conventional zoning without the incentives, it is not necessary to retain the designation. In addition to the above, as the Large Scale Mixed CPA 99-1- Text Amendment - FLUE Mixed Land Use Categories Page 2 Use overlay designation is being eJiminated, FLUE Policy C-2.2 regarding the same will also be deleted. Other Mixed Use: With the~~doption of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Ma~p in November 1989~ the Other Mixed Use (OMU) pattern was applied to the Old-School Square Historic Dis.t~ct, the Holland property (now Linton Office Park),~and~ntil 1995, the Blood's Grove "pr~e~ (now Hammock Reserve subdivi~sion~). The OMU designation has a rando' h'k.p, attern and the zoning designat_ions~'do not have to be congruent with the FLUM c~'~.?y. The description of~th~category is lengthy and references conventional zoning dis'tfic, ts through a pl?m~ed development approach (i.e. PCC, PRD, etc.). The OMU~does no"St'-p~rovid, d~e~r~evelopment incentives which were previously identified with the Large Scale. Vied Use overlay. While the description references other conventional zonin~dist~ricts a§--W.ell as SAD (Special Activities District) zoning, Table L-7 (Land Use.~i~esignation/Zonin~'~atrix) indicates that the OMU designation is only consi.stefit with the Old School~.uare Historic Arts District (OSSHAD), Commun[tyd='acilities (CF), and Agriculture (A'~zoning districts. As the OMU category is_orfl~"applied to the Old School Square Historic District, the description of the categorT~'~hould be focussed on historic preservabon and mix-of uses, and a other rCet~nces eliminated. ~,... Redevelopment Areas: ~ In addition, some minor technical changes are being made to the Redevelopment Area'""~-~ category. I By motion, recommend to the City Commission approval of the text amendments to the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan regarding the description of the Mixed Use Categories. Attachment: Text Changes '"'~-'"~"~-'f-"-'~ ~"' '~""'"~"~'~"'~"1'''~''~ ""*"'~"'.7 ~'.,7 t''''v'''''~ ~..~,L,~,~,-,. ,~ ,,-, ~.,,, ~,~,,,-,,./ ~,-,,~,,,..,.,.,,.,,, ,,,,,~,, to 75% cf !ts land a~'~'~, ........................ j ................ ~, ................. ,...~, ,+ r,,~,~.~ the, ~.~'+~'~'~'~"~.., ,~.,..~,~.;,.~..,:.,m, , ;,, ....... ,~., ~....,...'~ ~,,, ~no/_,~, . -r~,,~ ..,.,,,~ -,,,m,-,m,~,, ~'~*'~'~"~*" "~ ..... ~"~' ~"~ ~'~*~"'~G'~'~'~ "* +~ *~ *h~* '~ ~ ~"~+ m~ location ~ ~thsr Mixed Usc MIXED USE: This desiqnation is applied to the majority of the ~rope~ies located in the Old School Square Historic District, and is specially created to accommodate the mix of usos anticipated in the aforementioned District. The designation iS located w~th~n the lranspo~ation Concurrencg Exception Area describe~ in the Future kand Use Element and ~raphical~g shown in Figure l_-8. The Mixed Use ~esi~nation accommodates a varieW of uses includinq limited commercial and office development: Iow densi~ sinqle familg and du¢lex development~ multiple famil~ units .gnlg in con~unction with a non'residential use (i.e. mixed use development): and uses such as bed and brea~ast, and r~sidentiat-~pe inns. Th=rs ~= ~m a .... ~ ........ for ..... .... ;~, ...... m~ ~;v~ ,,~ ~:~+~:~+~ h h Old S~: 'e ...... ~:~+~;~ )~ ~ ...... ~ .............. . ............. SUO DS +. D , ....... H. ............ ., S Rcdcvclcp .m. cr.t .~.rc=c REDEVELOPMENT AREAS: This designation is applied to those areas which have been identified in the Future Land Use Element as being in need of redevelopment. Development shall occur pursuant to a specific "redevelopment plan" which is to be prepared pursuant to Objective C-2 of the Future Land Use Element. If a development proposal is presented to the City prior to the creation and adoption of a redevelopment plan, that proposal shall be handled in one of the following ways: the application shall be placed on hold for not more than six months while the redevelopment plan is prepared; the application shall be processed on a case-by-case basis with the existing zoning map, the Future Land Use Element, and the Housing Element providing the Local Planning Agency with the policy guidance needed to properly dispose of the application. (Note: A description of each of the redevelopment areas is contained within the Obiective C-2 of the Future Land Use Element.) SUPPORT DOCUMENT #3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 FIVE-YEAR SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS TABLE CI-CIP FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJECTS > $25,000 PROJECT & FUND J FY 1999-00 J FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 I FY 2002-03 J FY 2003-04 RECREATION IMPACT FEE FUND Southwest Park 550,000 0 0 0 0 Sandoway Park Rest Rooms 90,000 0 0 0 0 Rollerblade Park 10,000 0 380,000 0 0 TOTALS $550,000 $0 $380,000 $0 $0 BEACH RESTORATION FUND Turtle Monitoring 13,450 24,000 14,800 14,800 14,800 Engineering 73,000 54,500 0 0 0 Environmental (Construction) 210,000 200,000 52,000i 0 0 Sand Pumping 0 5,500,000 0 0 0 Bidding/Negotiation 18,000: 0 0 0 0 Dune Revegetation 0: 60,000 0 0 0 Construction Loan 0 300,000 0 0 0 Surveys (Yearly) 35,000 42,000 35,000 36,500 37,500 TOTALS $349,450 $6,180,500 $101,8001 $51,300 $52,300 WATER / SEWER - NEW CAPITAL OUTLAY NW 18th/Don Francisco Way 0 852,000 NW 24th Improvements 0 0 1,355,000 0 0 GIS Mapping 150,000 0 0 0 0 TOTALS S: 50,000 $852,000 $1,355,000 $0 $0 WATER / SEWER FUND CONNECTION FEES Davis/Lone Pine Road 94,000 627,000 0 0 0 SE 7th Ave. Water Main 553,000 0 0' 0 0 Sewer - Venetian Drive 392,000 0 0 0 0 Hospital Agreement 45,000i 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 TOTALS Si.D84,000 $672,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 'MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE FUND Mach& Equipment 73,000 85,000 85,0001 90,000 90,000 Traffic Calming Highland Avenue 53,000i 0 0! 0 0 Irrigation System 0 75,000 0 0 0 Cart Paths t 00,000 0 0 0 0 TOTALS S?_26,000 $160,000 $85,000 $90,000 $90,000 LAKEVlEW GOLF COURSE FUND Other Machine & Equipment 20.000' 20,000 25,0001 25,000 25,000 TOTALS S20,000 $20,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 Cl -28 TABLE CI-ClP FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJECTS > $25,000 ....... PRO,JE~CT & FUND J FY 1999-00 J FY 2000-01 J FY 2001-02 J FY 2oo2-o3J FY 2003-04 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION FUND Tennis Center Improvements 236,000 50,000 25,000: 36,000 100,000 Seacrest Improvements 791,000, 0 01 0: 0 Boy Scout Hut Improvements 0 0 0: 0' 400,000 Street Reconstruction 100,000 100,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Sidewalks / Swales / Bike 25,000 25,000 50,000 75,000 75,000 Downtown Parking Lots 50,000 . 0 100,000 80,000 0 P&R Maintenance Compound 220,000 . 0 0 0 0 Garage Addition 0 175,000 0 0 0 Cemetery Maintenance Building 0 0 115,000 0 0 R&R Buildings 150,000 126,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 R&R Computer Equipment 85,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 R&R Software / Licenses 14,900 ~ 161,000 14,900 161,000 14,900 Swinton Avenue, Phase II Beautification 314,000 ~ 0 0 0 0 Medians 0 30,000 325,000 0 0 Pompey Park Ballfleld 300,000 0 0 0 0 Parks/Parking Lots 0 0 84,000 0 0 Cemetery Improvements 0 0 110,000 0 0 Hurricane Improvements 0 0 0 300,000 0 Document Storage / Imaging 89,000 ' 0 79,700 0 0 Public Works Emergency Generator 0 0 0 0 250,000 R&R Bridges 15,000 0 15,000 0 0 Mobile Stage 0 0 110,000 0 0 Fire Clinic Relocation 0 0 0 0 50,000 Traffic Preemption 0 0 0 56,000 24,000 NE 4th Street/NE 3rd Roadway 459,390 ' 0 0 0 0 Roundabouts 0 243,000 0 0 0 Traffic Calming - SE 7th Avenue 0 0 50,000 0 0 ISTEA Sidewalks 0 0 46,200 0 0 Traffic Calming - NW 22nd Avenue 0 0 0 0 57,000 Old School Square - Misc. Building 0 600,000 0 0 0 Street Furniture - Atlantic Avenue 30,000 0 16,000 0 0 Linton Boulevard & Federal Highway 2,000 25,000 0 0 0 Linton Boulevard 0 25,000 250,000 0 0 NE 2nd Avenue Corridor 1,500,000 169,000 0 0 0 Atlantic Dunes 0. 0 0 7,500 75,000 Swinton Avenue (Phase II) 0 0 0 172,000 0 Pompey Park Playground 61,200 0 0 0 0 Sarah Gteason Park 20,000 200,000 0 0 0 Miller Park 0 68,500 69,500 0 0 Lake Ida Park 0 0 20,000 198,000 102,000 Intracoastal Park 0 0 25,000 250,000 0 Currie Commons - Lights 0 0 0 85,000 0 Catherine Strong Center 0 0 0 0 30,000 Delray Full Service Center 0 0 0 0 10,000 Computerized Irragation System 0 25,000 25,000 0 25,000 Phone System Replacement 0 36,000 0 0 0 CI -29 TABLE CI-CIP FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJECTS > $25,000 PROJECT & FUND I FY 1999-00I FY 2000-01 I FY 2001-02 IFY 2002-031 FY 2003-04 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION FUND Knowles Park 90,000 0 0 0 0 Police - AS400 Upgrade 0 0 100,000 0 100,000 Garage Hurricane Shutter Door 90,000 0 0 0 0 Lifeguard Towers 0 54,000 54,000 54,000 54,000 -:I-OTALS $4,642,490 $2,212,500 $2,134,300 $1,924,500 $1,816,900 WATER/SEWER RENEWAL & REPLACEMENT Equipment Replacement Program '~3,0001 12,000 01 35,000' 80,000 Lift Station Rehabilitation 200,000', 200,000 200,000! 200,000 ~ 200,000 Sewer Main Rehabilitation 750 000; 750,000 750,000: 750,000! 750,000 Southeast Interceptor 100, 0001 0 0 0 0 Linton-Line Relocation 223 500 0 01 0 0 Watermain NE 2nd Avenue 120,000 0 0', 0 0 Sanitary MH Rehab 100000 100,000 100,000' 100,000 100,000 Watermain 1st Avenue 0 144,000 349,000 0 0 Wat-~rmain NW 24th Avenue 0 188,0001 0 0; 0 Raw Water Well Rehab 75,000 75,000 75,000! 75,0001 75,000 Roundabouts 0: 35,0001 0i 0 0 Water & Sewer- Sunket/Reigle/Mango 0 172,000, 01 01 0 Water & Sewer- Lindell Boulevard 0 81,000~ 0 0 0 Water & Sewer - Canal Street 0 61,000i 0 0 0 Lift Station 50 Booster Conversion 0 50,000 450,0001 0 0 Water/Sewer Southridge Road Area 0 0 0: 90,000 0 SW Area Improvements 0 0 517,000~ 0' 0 Watermain NW 1st Avenue 0 0 0 113,000 i 0 Watermain NE 8th Avenue 0 0 0 487,000 0 Watermain NW 9th Avenue 0i 0 0: 358,000~ 0 Watermain NW 13th Ave & NW 14th Ave 0: 0 0; 0! 364,000 Watermain SW 13th Ave & SW 15th Ave : 01 0! 0; 01 591,000 Water/Sanitary - Brooks/Rhodes/V~ite i 0! 0! 01 01 205,000 Water Distribution Improvements 85,000] 0i 0 0! 0 Watermain SW 8th Court 72,500~, 0 0 ~ 0 0 TOTALS $1,739,000 ; $1,868,000 $2,441,000 !$2 208 000 : $2,365,000 CI -30 TABLE CI-CIP FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJECTS > $25,000 ' '-~PRoJECT & FUND I FY 1999-00I FY 2000-01 I FY 2001-021FY 2002-031 FY 2003-04, CITY MARINA FUND Rive~ai-k- ........ 30,000 200,000 :: 0 0 0~ Concrete Cap 30,000! 0! 0 0 01 Marina Renovation 280,000 0; 0 0 0 TOTALS $340,000 $200,000 $01 $0 = $0 STORMWATER UTILITY FUND ~ Venetian Drive 1BS,000 ' 0: 01 0, 0 S.W. 8th Court 130,000 0 0 0' 0 N.W. 24th Avenue 0 0i 150,0001 0 0 N.W. 18th Avenue 01 210,000i 0! 0. 0 N.W. 1st Street 0! 0i 615,0001 0i 0 East George Bush Boulevard 0 40,000! 35,000 0 0 South Ridge Road 0 0 77,0001 420,000; 0 Seacrest/Del Ida 134,000' 0 0 0~ 0 Royal Palm Boulevard 151,000 0: 0! 0' 0 Pond Retention SW 4th Avenue 0 86,0001 0 0' 0 Seacrest Park 158,250 286,750; 0 0: 0 Andrews Avenue Pipe Lining 0 110,000 0 0 0 Swale Reconstruction 60,000 54,250 60,0001 60,000; 60,000 Alley NE 7th Avenue & NE 8th Avenue 35,000 0~ 0 0~ 0 Albatross Road 0 0 226,000! 159,000~ 0 Roundabouts 0 50,000! 0i 01 0 Storm Water Master Plan 60,000 01 0i 0; 0 NW 9th Ave/SW 14th Ave/SW'7th Ave 0 0i 0i 280,000! 0 NW 13th & 14th Avenue 0! 0! 0i 0! 220,000 SW 13th Ave & SW 15th Ave 01 0i 01 0; 375,000 NE 4th Street 50,0001 0i 01 0i 0 Island Drive 105,0001 0': 0~, 01 0 GIS Mapping 65,000i 0; 0i 0 0 NE 2nd Avenue 94,000 109,000; 0~ 0; 0 Canal Street 0~ 64,000; 0 01 0 SW Area Improvements 0 0 0 ~ 0: 185,000 Sunset/Reigle/Mango 0; 0 ' 110,000! 0 0 TOTALS $1,227,250 $1,010,000 $1,273,000 $919,000 $840,000 VEHICLE RENEWAL & REPLACEMENT Vehicle Replacement 988,330' 1,060,000: 1,100,000~ 1,100,0001 1,200,000 Vehicle Restoration 84,000 i 85,000 85,000 85,0001 85,000 TOTALS $1,072,330 $1,145,000 $1,185,000 $1,185,000 $1,285,000 CI-31 SUPPORT DOCUMENT #4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 FDOT ANALYSIS OF FEDERAL HIGHWAY MEMORANDUM To: Paul Dorling, Acting Director of Planning and Zoning From: John Walker, Project Coordinator_.~'/ Date: July 27, 1998 Subject: Federal Highway One-Way Pair The City Manager has requested a reduction in the ultimate section of the one- way pair segment of North Federal Highway (5th and 6th Avenues) from 3 lanes to 2 lanes in each direction. This reduction would accommodate sidewalk widening and streetscape enhancement in the segment. The attached memo from FDOT indicates that the segment will operate at acceptable LOS with the proposed lane reduction. You have already coordinated with MPO to modify their future p~ans for the segment. It would be appropriate to amend the Comprehensive Plan to reflect the change in the ultimate section. A review of the Plan finds that the following maps and tables may require amendment: · Table %1 should be changed from 3 lanes to 2 lanes for the ultimate section. · Maps #20~ and 21 should be changed to indicate 2 lanes as the 2015 operating condition. These changes could be made as part of the adoption of Plan Amendment 98-1. When the adopted Plan Amendment is transmitted back to DCA for review (with the FDOT memo as background), these new changes would be noted as not previously reviewed. Since FDOT is in support of the change, DCA should have no problem with the change. In addition, as a streetscape project develops, it would be appropriate to amend the Comprehensive Plan further in a future amendment by adding a policy calling for streetscape improvements in the segment. S:\adv\Federall FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.. c~ovtm'~on 'ak 'E TRANSPORTATION PLANNING OFFICE- DISTRICT 4 5ECRE?AY~ ._.~..~r'~ 3400 1V~st Commercial Blvd., 3rd Floor, Ft. LauderdMe, FL 33309-3421 Telephone: {954) 777-4601; Fax: {954) 777-4671 DATE: June 19, 1998 TO: Kick Chestert , COPIES: Joe Yesb~ck, Gerr30 Re'l y, Mary Conway, John Krane SUBJECT: SR 5/US-1 One-Way Pair in Delray Beach Evaluation of Proposed Changes The study corridor ofSR 5/US-I approximately from S.E. 10th Street to Bond Way is a one-way pair roadway with three lanes in each direction. The City of Delray Beach proposes to decrease the number of lanes from three to two lanes (with on-street parking) in this one-way pair section of U.S. 1. The following analysis estimates the Level of Service (LOS) of the study section under existing and proposed conditions. The 1997 field counts were available and projected (year 2020) volumes were calculated by assuming a Cumulative Growth Rate of one percent from the present year. Tabte 1 shows the existing and proposed volumes on US-1 at two locations - north and south of Atlantic Avenue. In addition, the table shows the expected LOS on US-1 with the 6-lane (existing laneage) and 4-1ane (proposed laneage) geometry, both as one-way pair alternatives. I North of Ave. Atlantic Ave. Atlantic South of 1997 2020 1997 2020 Two-Way Volume (Al)T) 22,500 28,286 27,500, . . 34,572 LOS for 6-lane Roadway A A A A (Existing Laneage) ..... LOS for 4-lane Roadway A A A C i(Proposed Laneage) Table 1: LOS on SR 5/US-1 from S.E. 10th Street to Bond Way Table 2 shows the maximum service volumes for a 6-lane and a 4-lane one-way roadway under different LOS thresholds. LOS 'B' LOS 'C' LOS 'D'* LOS 'E' 3-1ane One-Way Capacity x 2 51,840 60,480 64,440 64,440 2-lane One-Way Capacity x 2 33,480 39,9,60 42,840 42,960 2-1ane One-Way Capacity w/ 30,132 35,964 38,556 38,664 iOn-Street Parking** Table 2: Maximum Service Volumes ,ased on Table E-1 of LOS Manual Adopted LOS in City's Comprehensive Plm~ ** Estimated Capacity (reduced by 10% accmmnodate parking maneuvers) - used in Table 1 Analysis In addition, both the Palm Beach M~PO's Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) and Comprehensive Plans include the one-way pair section of US-1 as a 6-lane one-way pair roadway. However, an exception is a section of US-1 to the north of N.W. 8th Street (George Bush Boulevard) which is shown as a regular 4-lane roadway. Finally, a portion of the study section between S.E. 3rd Street and N.E. 4th Street is a Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (map attached). In conclusion, this analysis shows that the study section would operate at an acceptable LOS, even with the reduction of number oflanes from three to two lanes on each leg ofthe one-way pair. The amendment of both the LRTP and Comprehensive Plans is the most appropriate approach for the City to pursue reducing the laneage on US-1. The Palm Beach LRTP is currently being updated and should be finalized by December 1998. GS/aa .Attachments File #4365.01 MEMOILANDUM Date: June 3, 1998 To: William L. Cross, Asst. District Planning Manager, Systems Planning From: Doug O'Hara, Senior Transportation Planner Copy: File c:\work\projtraf593010\atlantic.wpd Subject: Traffic Forecast for US-1 North and South of Atlantic Avenue in Dekay Beach · Three transportation models reviewed for analysis, CF15, SERPM4, and the work model used for the US-1/Dixie Highway alternative in the Boca/Dekay Area. · Forecast volumes using regression analysks for all model alternatives indicated minimal growth. The highlighted columns on the regression worksheet indicate the SERPM4 analysis. · Recommendation for this analysis is 0.5 to 1% CGR for projection. This ~owlh rate suggests a 2020 projection of+/- 32,000. Project No: 93010-xxxx Date: 09f22./97 WPI No: 41 lxxxx File: C:\WORK'~PROJTRAF~.93010V~,TLANT/C.WK,~ Lo.ti,n: US-1 North & South of Atlantic / Proj."Mgr.:William L. Cross, Systems Planning Type Work: Lane Reduction Year Open to Traffic: 2000 Analyst: D. O'Hara Stn.# 93-5030 & 93-5340, US-1 N of Atlantic Ave Sin.# 93-5027 & 93-5227, US-1 S of Atlantic Ave Historical Costfeasil: SERP. I~,'J US-1 Costfeasibl SERPM4 3 US-1 Regressio; Year 2015 Year 201~ Year 2015 Year 2015 Year 20151 Year 2020 FSUTMS Peak Season ADT 30,900 33,800 28,200 FSUTMS Peak Season ADT 33,100 31,000 '] 27,500 FSUTMS AADT 29,355 32,110 26,790 FSUTMS AADT 31,445 29,450 i 26,125 1996 Pk Season Adj. MOCA Fac 0.95 0.9~ 0.95 Pk Season Adj. MOCA Factor = 0.95 0.95~ 0.95 Axle Adj. Factor thru 1988 = 0.95 0.96 0.96 Axle Adj. Factor thru 1988 = 0.95 0.961 0.96 F 15 ,-..,. F 15 '.' C D E i;;~?.:I~,F C D E"'" F Historical Adj. ' '."~!i:~ Historical Adj. ' ..':." Year AADT AADT AADT AADT:~i AADT Year AADT AADT AADT AADT . AADT 1987 na 0 0 · 7.0. 0 1987 na 0 0 '.~ 0 0 1988 24,134 23,200 23 200 23,200... 23,200 1988 26,448 25,400 25 400 25,400 25,400 1989 27,351 27,400 . 27400 27,40011 27,400 1989 26,545 26,500 26 500 26,500 26,500 1990 22,480 22.500 22 500 22,500'! 22,500 1990 23,758 23,800 23 800 23,800'! 23,800 1991 22,188 22 200 22 200 22,200 22,200 1991 25,223 25,200 25 200 26,200.:.t 25,200 1992 21,694 21.700 21 700 21,700 21,700 1992 29,000 29,000 · 29 000 29,000 I 29,000 1993 21,200 21 200 21 200 21,200 21,200 1993 25,000 25,000 25 000 26,000'~ 25,000 1994 24,000 24.000 24 000 24,001j 24.000 1994 27,500 27,500 27 500 27,5001~ 27,500 1995 25,000 25 000 25 000 26,0001 25,000 1995 25,000 25,000 25 000 26,000.1 25,000 1996 --22,500 22 500 22 500 22,50(J; 22,500 1996 25.500 25,500 25 500 26,80011 25,500 1997 ~2_2,50.0') 22 500 22 500 22,500'i 22,500 1997 ~_~,.50~ 27,500 27 500 27,$00:i~ 27,500 2015 F~'UTJ~$ 29 400 32,;i00:. 26,800 2015 FSU'-TMS 31,400 29,500.'l 26,100 1998 22 400 24 500 26,100.~ 24,500 1998 26.700 27,300 26,900~ 26,100 1999 22 300 24 700 25,400 24,700 1999 26,900 27,500 27,000..~ 26,100 2000 22 200 24 900 -26,700 24,900 2000 27,000 27,700 27,200 i 26,200 2001 22 000 25 100 26,000 25,100 2001 27,100 28,000 27,300:! 26,200 2002 21 900 25 400 26,400 25,400 2002 27,200 28,200 27,500 { 26,200 2003 21 700 25 600 26,700. 25,600 2003 27,400 28,400 27,600 ! 26,200 2004 21 600 25 800 27,000 25,800 2004 27,500 28,600 27,800 i 26,200 2005 21 500 26 000 27,3.00. 26,000 2005 27,600 28,800 27,900.:i 26,300 2006 21 300 26 200 27,600 26,200 2005 27,700 29,100 28,100.~ 26,300 2007 21 200 26 400 27,900 26,400 2007 27,900 29,300 28,200:.] 26,300 2008 21 000 26 600 28,20(~'~ 26,600 2008 28,000 29,500 28,400'! 26,300 2009 20 900 26 800 28,61~0~, 26,800 2009 28,100 29,700 28,500"! 26,400 ;2010 20 800 27 100 28,9b0. 27,100 2010 28,200 29,900 28,700"{ 26,400 2011 20 600 27 300 29,21~0 .27,300 2011 28,400 30,200 28,800'I 26,400 2012 20 500 27 500 29,500, 27,500 2012 28,500 30,400 29,000' j 26,400 2013 20300 27 700 29,80,1j¢ 27,700 2013 28,600 30,600 29,100,I 26,400 2014 20 200 27 900 30,100! 27,900 2014 28,800 30,800 28,300 .: 26,500 2015 20 100 28 100 30,40~;' 28,100 2015 28,900 31,100 29,400'~ 26,500 2016 19,900 28300 30,700 28,300 2016 29,000 31,300 29,600 :i 26,500 2017 19,800 28 500 31,10bi 28.500 2017 29,100 31,500 29,701~'ii! 2e,500 2018 19,600 28700 3'J,40~'.~ 28.700 201'8 29,300 31,700 29,9001 26,500 2019 19,500 29000 31,T00'~ 29,000 2019 29400 31,900 30,00011 26,600 2020 19,400 29 200 32,00.0.'.~] 29,200 2020 29 500 32,200 30,200 26,600 2021 Design Ye~ 19,200 29 400 32,300.I 29,400 2021 29.600 32,400 30,300 26,600 2022 19,100 · 29 600 32,600:~ 29,600 2022 29 800 32,600 30,$00 26,600 2023 18,900 29800 32,900'~ 29,800 2023 29900 32,800 30,6001' 26,700 2024 18,800 30 000 33,300~i 30,000 2024 30 000 33.000 30,800 26,700 2025 18,700 30200 33,601~.:J 30,200 2025 30100 33,300 30,900'I 26,700 2026 18,500. 30,400 33,900_~ 30,400 2026 30300 33,500 31,100! 26,700 Compound Growth Rate P~";'~t Compound Growth Rate From To Historical Costfeasil: SER'i'~).:'.j:-;~ US-1 FrOmyear YearT° Historical Costfeasibl SERPM4.~:,.~.,:~;;;,i US-1 Year Year : 1988 1997 -0.34% -0.34% -0.34%]-0.34% 1988 1997 0.89% 0.89% 0..89%I 0.89°/0 1996 2001 -0.37% 1.84% : 2.~%J 1.84% 1996 2001 1.02% 1.57% 1.14%J 0.45% 2001 2011 -0.60% 0.74% 1.1J8¢.] 0.74% 2001 2011 0.43% 0.70% 0:4'~;/o ] 0.10% 2001 2021 -0.65% 0.77% 1 06%1 0.77% 2001 2021 0.42% 0 71% 0.$0Y.i 0.09% R Squared 0.0539 0.3739 0.5~27~! 0.3739 R Square 0.0601 0 5538 0.3712'~ 0.0114 TABLE E- 1 GENERALIZED ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S URBANIZED AREAS* STATE 'I%%'O-WAY ARTERL-'U..S FREEWAYS UNINTERRUUFED ~OW Group I (wilhin urbanized area over 5~,~0 and leading lo or passing ~ilhin 5 miles of Ibc ptim~ cily coal;al business distrlcl) Unsignalized ~vcl of Scmict ~vel of Semice ~n~s A B C D E ~n~s A B C D E 4 22,~0 35,200 52.900 67,000 80,800 2 Undiv. 8,900 13,9~ 18,900 24,800 33,1~ 6 33,100 52,~00 79,4~ 100,600 126,000 4 Div. 21.500 25,800 50,100 60,100 71,600 8 44,100 70,500 105.900 134,100 169,200 6Div. 32,200 53,7~ 75,2ffi 90,200 107,400 10 55,200 gS,200 132,400 167.700 211,400 12 63,200 I01,100 151,700 192,200 242,300 IhWE~UPTED ~OW Group 2 (within utbanized area and nol in Group I) Class la (>0.~ to 2.49 signalized lnlersections per mile) ~vtl of Se~ice ~vtl of Semice ~nes A B C D E ~nts A" B C D'** E'" 4 20,300 32j00 48,800 61,800 74,5~ 2 Undiv. 12,6~ 15,200 16,6~. 17,~0. c 6 30,600 aS,9~ 73,a00 93,000 117,300 4 Div. 27,900 33,3~ .35,700 35,800 L 8 40.800 65.200 97,900 124,000 156,300 .6 Div. 43.~0 50,4~ 53,~00. 53300 ' - A I0 51,000 81.5~ 122.300 155,000 195,400 8 Div. 53,800 62,~0 65,800 65,g~ s 12 58,400 93,200 140,~0 177,300 2~,600 S Class lb (2.50 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) NON-~ATE RO~WAYS ~vel o[ S:~i~ ~ b~ OR CI~'/COUN~ ROAD WAYS ~nts A* * B' * C D E Level of Semite 2 Undiv. 8,800 14,300 15,900 ~nes A" B" C D E 4 Div. 19,2~ 31,100 34,000 2 Undiv 10,900 14,200 15,500 6 Div. 29,3~ 47,500 5 t,400 4 Div. 24,400 31,~0 33,200 8 Div. 35,800 58,000 62,900 6 Div. 37,800 47j00 50,200 Class II (mort than 4.50 signalized ~nlerse~ions per mile and not OTItER SIGN~IZED ROADWAYS within primaU city central busings district of urbanized c (signalized intetseclion analysis) area over 5~,ffi0) L ~vel o[ Se~i~ ~vcl of Stmice ~ ~nes A'* B" C D E ~nes A'* B*' C** D E s 2 Undiv 5,200 10,200 1 l,V00 2 Undiv. I 1,8~ 15,200 s I 4 Div. I 1.400 22.600 ~. 100 4 Div. - 26,500 33,4ffi 6 Div. - - 40,~ 50,600 ADJU~IEh~S 8 Div. 49,~ 61,800 DIVIDED~NDIVIDED (alter corresponding tw~way volume indi~led ~lass III (mote than 4~0 signal~ed inlersections p~t mile and wilhin ~nm Median ~fl Turn Bays Adjuslment Faclo~ prima~ city central busin~ district of urbanized 2 Divided Yes +5% area over 5~,~) c 2 U.dividcd No t ~vel of Sc~i~ L Multi Undivid=d Yes ~n~s A'* B'* C' * D E * Multi O~ivid~d NO 2 Undiv. - - 13,200 14,8~ s 4 Div. - - 29,500 32,600 s ONE-WAY 6 Div. 44,800 49,3~ m (alltt corres~nding two-way volume indicated 8 Div. 54,7~ 60,100 One-Way Conts~nding Adjustment ~nes Tw~Way ~n~ Factor 2 4 40% 3 6 ~0% 4 8 (~ on ~m ~o~ mi ~k to ~ m~) ~r ~b of~ ~ ~e ~ on I~ l~ H~hwar ~',y Mmual U~e and ~ori~ Iraffi¢, ~a7 and si~ahm6~ ~ ~e ublcs ~umptom '" Vntum~ are ~mprzbie ~ intmm~ ~citiu arc l~c~ $~tuc: ~ri~ D~iflm~t of Tri~tlo~ 1995. 9SD~ (~US~gS E-I SUPPORT DOCUMENT #5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 TABLE T-1 (STREET NETWORK CLASSIFICATIONS) Z 1.1,1 r,.) UJ ° 0"~ ..~ n~0 Z 0 I/J' Z o I-- ' Z <t: - o r.) , , i"'~-- _>, _>, _>, LL. 0 ~'- '" c ,- >-, >, >', >, :>- tZ~ 0 o "~ o o o o ~ o o o '~ ,~ '~ -[ - =._ o ~: '~ c~ ,-._~ c~ mo mo c~--~ · '::' . ~0 Or.O ~)~ ~ 'm,- .~,_ ~,._. _~ ~:-~ . l--' I~ o '- ~ o ._o _ ~_ ~ SUPPORT DOCUMENT #6 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 MAP EXHIBIT #20 (2015 OPERATING CONDITIONS) SW 2~ AVE N.T.$. COCONUT F ~ D i D / C C c AT ~NT*C AVE TR[-RAIL/ C J AMTRAK D D C D D C LOWSON BLVD (S 1D Sg D ~ I D D F D D C I I I ffFFY LI~!T$ SOURC£: METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION OF PALM BE. ACH COUN~f, 2015 COUNTY MODEL. [ 20 ! $ OPERATIN6 I:ONDITIONS PRIOR TO PRO6RAMMED IMPROVEMENTS 7/28/97 LEGENJ~: ,MAP ,l~20 * - PROJECTED TO MEET RE'VISED 5/2/99 ----- 10L mm- 4L PEAK HOUR STANDARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH i- 8L .... 2L ONE-WAY i I NOT SHOWN IN 2015 Ak*_ IMPROVEMENT INCLUOED PLANNING z, ZONING DEPT. m- 6L m- 2L COUNTY MODEL IN 2015 PLAN SUPPORT DOCUMENT #7 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 MAP EXHIBIT #21 (2015 COST FEASIBLE PLAN) ~e 2015 ~05T FEASIBLE PLAN ~- ~OL .... 2L ONE-WAY ~ - PR~EC~D TO ~E~ NO~: LOS ;S SHOWN FOR R~S~ 3/3/gg ~- 6L ~- NOT SHOWN ON 2015 ~ P~K HOUR STANDARD O~R-~AC~ UN~S ON C~ OF D~Y 8~C~ ~- ~L COST F~B~ P~N - INCONS~S~NT Wl~ EXHIBIT 16 FOR CO~P~ISON. P~NING ~ Z~ING DEPT. ~- 2L EXlS~NG ~N~ SUPPORT DOCUMENT #8 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 DELRAY OAKS FLUM STAFF REPORT PLANNING AN'D ZONING BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: March 15. '~999 AGENDA ITEM: IV.F.2. ITEM: Future Land Use Ma2 Amendment From Transitional to Open Space-Conservation and Rezonin~ From POS (Planned Off;ce Center) to OS (Open Space) for Detray Oaks Preserve, Locate: at the Northwest Corner of Congress Avenue and S.W. 29th Street. Associated with Comnrehensive Plan Amendment 99-1 - Transmittal Hearing. GENERAL DATA: Owner ................. ............ Palm Beach :C-,:nty Applicant ..... David T. Harce.-.. City Manaoer Location .......................... No~hwest comer of Congress Avenue and '~ ,, Prope~y Size. 24.52 Acres ' Use Map Designation ..... Transitional ,'~"~'="' Proposed Future Land Use Map Designation ..... Open Space-C:~servation ~i l o Current Zoning ............... POC (Plannec Office Center) Proposed Zoning ............ OS (Open Sp=;e) c A T i P0C Adjacent Zoning .... North: POC & RM (Medium Density ~%'0=¢ ~,~o~,~-~ Residential) East: PCC (Planned C~mmerce Center) & Proposed Land Use.. Installation of a 2-space parking X , Water S~lc .................. N/A IVY'? The action before the Board is making a recommendation to the City Commission to change the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and Zoning Map designations for the 24.52-acre Delray Oaks Preserve. The request involves a FLUM amendment from TRN (Transitional) to OS-C (Open Space - Conservation) and rezoning from POC (Planned Office Center) to OS (Open Space). The subject property is located at the northwest corner of Congress Avenue and South West 29t~ Street. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.2.2(E), the Local Planning Agency (Planning and Zoning Board) shall review and make a recommendation to the City Commission with respect to all amendments to the City's Future Land Use Map and Zoning Map. Palm Beach County acquired the subject property in December 1995, with funds approved through the Environmentally Sensitive Lands Bond on March 12, 1991. The City served as the County's partner in an application for State matching funds for acquisition of the subject property. The City has received a site plan application from the Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management to install a 12-space parking area and nature trail with observation platform at the Delray Oaks Preserve. The City's Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designation for the property is TRN (Transitional) and it is currently zoned POC (Planned Office Center), which does not permit the preserve and the associated improvements. Pursuant to Conservation Element, Policy B-1.1 of the Comprehensive Plan, publicly owned environmentally sensitive areas are to be identified on the FLUM by an "Open Space-Conservation" symbol. In order to be consistent with the use of the property and Conservation Element Policy B-1.1, it is necessary to change the FLUM description to Open Space-Conservation and the zoning designation to OS (Open Space). The OS zoning is appropriate for passive parks, such as Delray Oaks. The zoning change was initiated by the City Commission on March 2, 1999, as was the FLUM amendment, which is to be included in Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1. This Future Land Use Map Amendment is being processed pursuant to the '~vice a year statutory limits for consideration of plan amendments (F.S. 163.3187). P & Z Board Staff Report Delray Oaks Preserve - FLUM Amendment and Rezoning Page 2 Land Use Analysis: Pursuant to Land Development Regulation Section 3.1.1(A) (Future Land Use Map), all land uses and resulting structures must be allowed in the zoning district within which the land is situated and, said zoning must be consistent with the land use designation as shown on the Future Land Use Map. As noted previously, the proposed site plan indicates that the park will be developed with a nature trail that includes an observation platform and 12-space parking lot. The proposed passive park and accessory facilities are allowed in the OS zoning district. According to Table L-7 of the Comprehensive Plan, the OS zoning district is consistent with the OS-C Future Land Use Map designation. REQUIRED FINDINGS: Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.7: Amendments to the Future Land Use Map must be based upon the following findings: [] Demonstrated Need -- That there is a need for the requested land use. The need must be based upon circumstances such as shifts in demographic trends, changes in the availability of land, changes in the existing character and FLUM designations of the surrounding area, fulfillment of a comprehensive plan objective or policy, or similar circumstances. Data and analysis must support the need. This policy shall not apply to requests for the FLUM designations of Conservation or Recreation and Open Space. An analysis of the "Demonstrated Need" is not required since the proposal is a Conservation FLUM amendment. [] Consistency - The requested designation is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the most recently adopted Comprehensive Plan. Goal Area B of the Conservation Element states that sensitive lands that provide habitat and contain native vegetation vital to the maintenance of the environmental quality of this community shall be conserved and protected. The Delray Oaks Preserve is one of the properties designated for preservation. The proposed OS-C FLUM designation is appropriate when designated land is to be preserved. Therefore, the FLUM designation change promotes the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Concurrency - Development at the highest intensity possible under the requested designation can meet the adopted concurrency standards. The highest intensity development allowed by the proposed OS zoning district and OS-C FLUM designations are passive parks. The current POC zoning district designation allows for planned office complexes. Since the demand on public services is far less for passive parks than office complexes, the FLUM and Zoning P & Z Board Staff Report Delray Oaks Prese~,e - FLUM Amendment and Rezoning Page 3 '- Map designation changes will have a positive impact with respect to meeting concurrency requirements. [] Compatibility - The requested designation will be compatible with the existing and future land uses of the surrounding area. The OS-C FLUM and OS zoning designations will be compatible with the surrounding existing and future land uses. The existing adjacent uses are the Catalfumo planned OfT'iCe center to the north, the Delray Oaks multiple family development to the south, industrial to the east (across Congress Avenue), and the Sabal Pines East multiple family development to the west. The proposed conservation area will not have an adverse affect on these surrounding uses. The Delray Oaks Preserve will generate 39 average daily trips (1.59 trips x 24.52 acres). Given the acreage of the property, the site could be developed as a planned office center with 320,000 square feet of floor area. A 320,000 square foot planned office complex generates 3,245 trips per day. The surrounding roads can accommodate the trips generated by the proposed nature preserve. Furthermore, the impact on public services such as fire protection, water, sewer, solid waste, drainage, and police is also significantly less for the conservation area than a planned of Tice center. The DERM has indicated that the conservation area will operate during daylight hours and will be closed during evening hours. Consequently, there will be no patron interaction with the park during the evening hours. Finally, the use of the property as a conservation area will not have a positive or negative effect on the property values of the surrounding properties. Since the conservation area will have a Iow impact on the surrounding properties, the property values will not be affected due to the proposed FLUM or zone change. Compliance - Development under the requested designation will comply with the provisions and requirement of the Land Development Regulations. As noted previously, the Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management has submitted a site plan application for a passive park on the subject property. The improvements noted on the proposed site plan are consistent with the uses allowed in the OS-C FLUM and OS zone designations. The site plan application and ~ompliance with the City's Land Development Regulations will be considered by the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board following the requested designation changes to the FLUM and Zoning Map. P & Z Board Staff Report Delray Oaks Prese,~,e - FLUM Amendment and Rezoning Page 4 REQUIRED FINDINGS: (Chapter 3) Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body that has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to the Future Land Use Map, Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations. Future Land Use Map, Concurrency and Comprehensive Plan Consistency were previously discussed under the Future Land Use Map Analysis section of this report. Compliance with respect to Compliance with the Land Development Regulations (Standards for Rezoning Actions, Rezoning Findings) are discussed below. CONSISTENCY: Compliance with the performance standards set forth in Section 3.3.2 (Standards for Rezoning Actions) along with required findings in Section 2.4.5(D)(5) (Rezoning Findings) shall be the basis upon which a finding of overall consistency is to be made. Other objectives and policies found in the adopted Comprehensive Plan may be used in the making of a finding of overall consistency. Comprehensive Plan Policies: Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan was previously discussed under the Future Land Use Map Amendment Analysis section of this report. Section 3.3.2 (Standards for Rezonin9 Actions): Standards B and C are not applicable with respect to this rezoning request, as the rezoning for preservation of environmentally sensitive land does not affect the City's Housing Element or involves strip commercial development activity. The applicable performance standards of Section 3.3.2 are as follows: A) That a rezoning to other than CF, OS, OSR, OR Conservation within stable residential area shall be denied. The subject property is located along a principal arterial roadway (Congress Avenue). The surrounding existing land uses are a planned office park to the north, multiple family residential to the south and west, and a planned commerce center and industrial complex to the east (across Congress Avenue). The Delray Oaks Preserve is not located within a residential area but is adjacent to neighborhoods designated as stable residential on the Residential Neighborhood Categorization Map. The proposed rezoning is to OS, therefore a positive finding with respect to this standard can be made. P & Z Board Staff Repod Delray Oa:',s Prese,"ve - FLUM Amendment and Rezoning Page 5 D) That the rezoning shall result in allowing land uses which are deemed compatible with adjacent and nearby land uses both existing and proposed; or that if an incompatibility may occur, that sufficient regulations exist to properly mitigate adverse impacts from the new use. The proposed rezoning will implement the City's Conservation designation of the subject property. According to Table L-7 of the Future Land Use Element, the OS zone designation is compatible with the FLUM designations of the adjacent residential and commercial properties. As noted previously, the uses permitted in the OS zoning district are passive parks or water bodies. The passive park proposed by Palm Beach County is consistent with the proposed Zoning Map designation and the surrounding uses. The accessory facilities associated with the passive park such as parking will be considered via the site plan process in accordance with the City's Land Development Regulations. Section 2.4.5(D)(5) (Rezonin9 Findings): Pursuant to Section 2.4.5(D)(5), in addition to the provisions of Section 3.1.1, the City Commission must make a finding that the rezoning fulfills one of the reasons for which the rezoning change is being sought. These reasons include the following: a. That the zoning had previously been changed, or was originally established, in error; b. That there has been a change in circumstances which make the current zoning inappropriate; c. That the requested zoning is of similar intensity as allowed under the Future Land Use Map and that it is more appropriate for the property based upon circumstances particular to the site and/or neighborhood. The proposed OS zone designation is allowed under both the current TRN (Transitional) and the proposed OS-C FLUM designations. Given the proposed use of the property, the QS zone and OS-C FLUM designations are more appropriate for the property. The OS zone designation change from POC will ensure that the property is utilized as a passive, park rather than for office uses. Consequently, a positive finding with respect to (b) can be made since the purchase of the property by DERM for the purpose of establishing a passive park changes the circumstances with respect to appropriateness of the zoning designation. Furthermore, the OS zoning designation is more appropriate as passive parks are not allowed uses in the POC zoning district. P & Z Board Staff Report, Delray Oaks Preserve - FLUIvl Amendment and Rezoning Pa~e 6 '" I The subject property is not within a geographical area requiring review by the Community Redevelopment Agency, Downtown Development Authority or the Historic Preservation Board. Courtesy Notices: Courtesy notices have been provided to the following civic and homeowners associations: [] Progressive Residents of Delray (PROD) Q Delray Racquet Club [] Palms of Delray .rq Lake DelrayApartments [] Town & Country Estates Q Tropic Palms Public Notice: Formal public notice has been provided to property owners within a 500' radius of the subject property. Letters of objection and support, if any, will be presented at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting. The proposed passive park is incompatible with the current POC zoning designation, as it is not a permitted use. The appropriate zoning designation for passive parks is the OS zoning district. While the TRN FLUM designation can be applied for either planned office complexes or passive parks, the most appropriate FLUM designation is the OS-C designation as it will ensure that the property remains in its natural state and is not allowed to be developed. Positive findings can be made with respect to Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.7 of the Comprehensive, and Sections 3.1.1, 3.3.2 (Standards for Rezoning Actions) and 2.4.5(D)(5) of the Land Development Regulations, and the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. A. Continue with direction. B. Recommend to the City Commission approval of the Future Land Use Map amendments from TRN to OS-C, and the rezoning from POC to OS based upon positive findings with Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.7 of the Comprehensive Plan (FLUM Amendment Findings), Sections 3.1.1, 3.3.2 (Standards for Rezoning Actions) and 2.4.5(D)(5) of the Land Development Regulations, and the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. P & Z Board Staff Report Delray Oaks PreserYe - FLUM Amendment and Rezoning Page 7 C. Recommend to the City Commission denial of the Future Land Use Map amendments from TRN to OS-C, and the rezoning from POC to OS based upon a failure to make positive findings with Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.7 of the Comprehensive Plan (FLUM Amendment Findings), and Section 2.4.5(D)(5) of the Land Development Regulations, that the FLUM amendment and rezoning fail to fulfill one of the basis for which a FLUM amendment or rezoning should be granted. t.'~:"~ :~ :~.::-'~.-~*.~,~'.~.~'_~-'-~',.¢~:'~' ~ ~!~ ~ z? ~' : " ~ ~'''~ '~::" ~ '~ ''~~'~:;~;:~:~2~'~:~:~:: Recommend to the Ci~ Commission approval of the Future Land Use Map amendment from TRN to OS-C, and the rezoning from POC to OS based upon positive findings with Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.7 of the Comprehensive Plan (FLUM Amendment Findings), Sections 3.1.1, 3.3.2 (Standards for Rezoning Actions) and 2.4.5(D)(5) of the Land Development Regulations, and Goal Area "B" of the Comprehensive Plan, Conse~ation Element. Attachments: D Future Land Use Map ~ Zoning Map ,, 7 .&L : EJ N TIN~L lq - FUTURE~LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT - ~ FRDM: ~N ~&NSITIONAL) TO: OS-C (OPEN SPACE-CONSERVATION) ---- D,~ ~ ~4~ S~M --- ~= R[F: L~25 N ~ - REZONING - SUPPORT DOCUMENT #9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 DELRAY'S LOST DRIVE-IN FLUM STAFF REPORT PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: k,iarch 15, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: 1V.F.3. ITEM: Future Land Use Map Amendment Removing the Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay for Delr=-y's Lost Drive-in (f.k.a. Delray Swap Shop), Located on the East Side of Federal Highway, Approximately 500 Feet North of Allen Avenue. P.~ ~, -" 'RE Ai,¢ BOULEVARD Applicant ......... Davi: T. Harden, City Manager '/~ %~ Location .......................... East side of Federal Highway, //~ ~/ ~ ~ Pro~e~y Size 7.0 .... Existing Future Land Genera! Commercial with a Large~' - '"~~--~/ ~ Use Map Designation ..... Scale Mixed Use Overlay ~ ~/~ ProBosed Future Land Removal of the Large Scale Mixed i /~/ ~ Adjacent Zoning .... No,h: AC (Automotive Commercial) ~ ~:~?~&~:~i~ ' East: Town of Gulf Stream / / ~ ~ ~ South: RM (Medium Density Residential)~ ~_~, ~,.~ West: GC / ~~~ Proposed Land Use ........ Removal of the underlying Large I t i i I I I t ~i~"I il Scale Mixed Use Overlay due to the /~, ~,, I,,, I, ~,1~ ~7 ...... redevelopment of the Swap Shop ~ ~% ..~ ~,~... ~ ~.~.. IV.F.3. The item before the Board is that of making a recommendation to the City Commission on a City initiated Future Land Use Map amendment to remove the Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay designation from the Delray's Lost Drive-In (fka Swap Shop) property. The subject property is located on the east side of Federal Highway (U.S. 1), approximately 500' north of Allen Avenue. The subject prope~ consists of four unplaced parcels of land containing a total of 7 acres. The prope~ was developed in lg57, under the jurisdiction of Palm Beach Count, as a drive-in theater. The drive-in theater continued to operate until the late1970's at which time it was conve~ed to a flea market. In 1989, the subject prope~ was located in unincorporated Palm Beach County, within the CiW's Future Planning Area. ~th the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map the prope~ was given a Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay with an underlying land use designation of General Commercial. On Januaw 11, lg94, the CiW Commission approved an interlocal agreement with Palm Beach Coun~ for the annexation of the NoKh Federal Highway enclaves, including the Swap Shop. On Februaw 8, 1994, the Ci~ Commission initiated a Small Scale Future Land Use Map amendment and initial zoning of GC (General Commercial) for the Delray Swap Shop prope~. At its meeting of April 19, 1994, the Ci~ Commission approved the associated "Annexation and Development Agreement". On May 17, 1994, the Ci~ Commission approved on second and final reading the Small Scale Future Land Use Map amendment and Annexation with initial zoning of GC (General Commercial). The upgrades to the site as required by the Annexation and Development Agreement were subsequently implemented. On May 5, lg98, the Ci~ Commission approved a Conditional Use Modification request for redevelopment and expansion of the Swap Shop wbh the condition that a site plan be submiffed which inco~orated concepts that came from the NoKh Federal Highway planning charre~e (held in November of 1977). On July 22, 1998, the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board approved a Class IV Site Plan Modification for th~ redevelopment and expansion of the Swap Shop. The redevelopment of the site is currently in process. On March 2, 19gg, the Ci~ Commission initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendment 9g- 1. The amendment includes the removal of the Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay from the prope~. Planning and Zoning Board Steff repo,1 FLUM Amendment - Remove] of Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay Designation for Detray's Lost Drive-In Page 2 [: '::;: 8. U~.T.: U:R'.E,.¢i:_.E A._N.D~.~.U: $.E.~;~ M.~;.P_.i::':A..M.E.N.:.D;M E. ~N:3:!:': A..NiA..:.bY S I S;:;:; ". :. Future Land Use Element- Mixed Use Categories: In the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan, the Large Scale Mixed Use category is described as a designation that is applied to those properties which will be developed or redeveloped solely by private entities. It is an overlay designation, which provides incentives for redevelopment. The land uses which are allowed are governed by the underlying land use as shown on the Future Land Use Map .... A large Scale Mixed Use development shall occur only through the application of Special Activities District (SAD) zoning. Land which has a Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay need not develop in such a manner; but may develop pursuant to the underlying (or base) land use designation. The Swap Shop is the last remaining property in the City with a Large Scale Mixed Use overlay designation. The overlay designations were created to provide incentives for redevelopment, but the Large Scale Mixed Use category was never utilized. Therefore, it has not served its intended purpose. As the property is currently being development under the GC (General Commercial) underlying land use designation, it is appropriate to eliminate this designation from the Future Land Use Map. REQUIRED FINDINGS: Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.7: Amendments to the Future Land Use Map must be based upon the following findings: Q Demonstrated Need -- That there is a need for the requested land use. The need must be based upon circumstances such as shifts in demographic trends, changes in the availability of land, changes in the existing character and FLUM designations of the surrounding area, fulfillment of a comprehensive plan objective or policy, or similar circumstances. The need must be supported by data and analysis. This policy shall not apply to requests for the FLUM designations of Conservation or Recreation and Open Space. Pursuant to the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan, land which has a Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay need not develop in such a manner, however it may develop pursuant to the underlying (or base) land use designation. A Large Scale Mixed Use development shall occur only through the application of Special Activities District (SAD) zoning. As the property recently received Conditional Use and site plan approval for a major redevelopme, nt under the GC zoning designation, and the improvements are currently being constructed, it is appropriate to remove the overlay designation. After the removal of the Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay category, the property will have GC (General Commercial) Future Land Use Map and zoning designations. Therefore, positive findings can be made with respect to Future Land Use Map consistency. P:,anning and Z.'~ning Board S:aff repo,1. FLUM Amendment - Remora'. of Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay Designation for Delray's Lost Drive-In Pa_3e 3 ~ Concurrency -- Development at the highest intensity possible under the requested designation can meet'the adopted concurrency standards. In the preparation of the Deiray Beach Comprehensive Plan, the land use designations throughout the entire planning and service area were considered in the overall land use pattern as well as the level of services. The removal of the Large Scale Mixed Use overlay designation will not result in any changes to service demands. F'I Compatibility -- The requested designation will be compatible with the existing and future land uses of the surrounding area. The subject property is bordered by the following zoning designations: to the north and west is zoned GC; to the south is zoned RM (Medium Density Residential); and to the east, is zoned Town of Gulf Stream OR (Outdoor Recreation). The surrounding land uses are: to the north, Second Chance Emporium and Borton Motors; to the west, across Federal Highway, Del Sol Patio Factory; to the south, Kokomo Key (a multiple family development); and to the east is a spoil area for dredging the Intracoastal Waterway (FIND Property). The elimination of the Large Scale Mixed Use overlay will have no impact with respect to compatibility. The existing GC FLUM has been deemed compatible with the surrounding area. L--'I Compliance -- Development under the requested designation will comply with the provisions and requirement of the Land Development Regulations. The requested designation is GC (General Commercial) without the Large Scale Mixed use overlay. The approved site plan that is currently under construction was approved pursuant to the GC FLUM and zoning designations, and complies with the applicable req uirements. The subject property is not in a geographical area requiring review by the DDA (Downtown Development Authority) or the HPB (Historic Preservation Board). Community Redevelopment Agency: At its meeting of February 25, 1999, the Community Redevelopment Agency reviewed and recommended approval of the Future Land Use Map amendment for the Swap Shop property. Courtesy Notice: Courtesy notices were sent to the following homeowner's and civic associations: D La Hacienda Homeowners Association · Community Redevelo_pment Agency Delray Beach MEMO TO: Diane Dominguez cc: Shelley Treadwell Ron Hoggard FRO]X/I: Chris Bro'~ ~~ DATE: March 10. 1999 RE: Changes to the CilT's Comprehensive Plan Pertaining to West Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Diane: We would appreciate it if you would consider in },om' upcoming Comprehensive Plan .4a-nendments. the following y__eD/import, ant matters concerning West Atlantic Avenue redevelopment: 1. The West Atlantic Avenue "GC Overlay" zoning district should more strongly emphasize mixed-use development. Referring to Sections 4.4.9(B)(5) and 4.4.9(G)(1)(b), a mixed-use structure would require SPP,_AB approval. This should be eliminated. The West At/antic Plan clearly emphasizes mixed-use development. 2. The restriction of residential on the ground floor should be only for property fronting on West Atlantic Avenue, NW and SW 5'h Avenues. On side streets, residential on the g-round floor may be perfectly acceptable. 3. The West Atlantic Redevelopment Plan calls for two to four stories of mixed use buildings, with either residential or office on the upper floors and commercial on the ground floor. Under the current lin~itation of a "RM" density, 6 to 12 un/ts per acre, no multi-story structure could be built. We offer that any project over 12 units per acre would require a conditional use approval. We ask that you add this matter in your Comprehensive Plan Amendmen! 99-1. I realize we are ~king you to consider these changes m the last moment, but we are about to sell two large parcels, Block 2g and Block 36, and we have interest from market-rate, multi-family developers. Having market-ra~e housing would be a big economic boost to West Atlantic Avenue. Thank you tbr your consideration. 24 N. Swinton Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33444 (561) 276-8640 / Fax (561) 276-855B I "'i, ..,~:':!: ,'" ',- TEXT..CHANGES { General Commercial: This designation is applied to land which is, or should be, developed for general commercial purposes e.g. retail, office, services. Light industrial type uses such as fabrication and assembly are permissible under this designation when located in the special overlay district between Federal Highway and Dixie Highway, north of N.E. 14th Street to the north City limit. ,~'"';'~'~'+;'~'....~,....., ,,,.., ........ ~...., ,., ,,,.~..'~,,-,- +~,-,,,, ,..~ =.~, ,,; ...., ...., ,,-.,i ...., ~.,..,+~,-", ,;,,!th ~ ........ --,-',, ,,, ,'-,, '-',,-',;"~,-' ........~'--, ~, '~ ,, C+, r"--, ....,, ,,,.,,.,,,.,,,.,;~'~';1"1'~ O~ ,1"'"'"1,., ,,~ ,.,, ,,.,.,, ,°1" ..... 2S ~., .... ,~,, ,.,,"H ....,,,,,,.., v,..,r"~'"'"'";"~ ch, +~',,,~ ~"+, ..~,.. .... ~ ~"'~_~,,.. ~ ~""....~ M~p. Residential uses are permitted in specific zoninq districts either in coniunction.with a commercial use, or as a stand alone use, subiect to Conditional Use approval. Residential density is limited to a maximum of 12 dwellinq units per acre. except within the West Atlantic Avenue Overlay where the density may exceed 12 units per acre subject to Conditional Use approval. Policy A-5.6 The City shall amend the General Commercial (GC) zonin,q district to accommodate increased multiple family densities over 12 units per acre. as a Conditional Use in the West Atlantic Avenue Overlay District. City Commission Documentation Meeting of Ap¢i120, 1999 Page 3 Staff suggested that given the Iow deqsity residential developments north and south of the redevelopment area, the density could be limited to a maximum of 30 units per acre, with density increases over 12 units per acre subject to a conditional use approval. The Board agreed that the increase should be subject to Conditional Use approval, but didn't feel it was appropriate to establish a maximum. Staff noted that there are special regulations pertaining to the West Atlantic Avenue Overlay District that would ultimately limit the density, such as a 48' height limitation west of NW 3rd Avenue and SW 4th Avenue, and limitation of the depth of commercial/mixed use structures to 150', with a depth up to 300' allowed as a Conditional Use. After further discussion, the Board unanimously recommended that an amendment be processed with Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1 to increase the residential density in mixed-use projects within the West Atlantic Avenue redevelopment area, without a density limitation, as a Conditional Use and subject to performance standards. Once the Comprehensive Plan amendment is adopted, an LDR amendment will be processed to include the language within the GC zoning district regulations. I :., :". : RECOMMENDED ACTION · " J By motion, approve an amendment to the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan regarding the description of the General Commercial land use category to establish density parameters, and adding Policy A-5.6 to accommodate an increase in residential density in the West Atlantic Avenue Overlay District. Attachments: Text Changes Request Letter ITEM BEFORE THE COMMISSION The item before the City Commission is a text amendment to the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan regarding the description of the General Commercial land use category to establish density, and adding Policy A-5.6 to accommodate an increase in density in the West Atlantic Avenue Overlay District section of the General Commercial zoning district, pursuant to LDR Section 9.2.1 (Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On March 10, 1999, the Director of the Community Redevelopment Agency submitted a request that an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan be processed in conjunction with Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1 to allow an increase in residential density as a Conditional Use, within the West Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Area. The CRA has aggregated properties for redevelopment within Block 28 and 36 in the West Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Area, and developers are interested in providing market-rate multiple family housing. The current description of the General Commercial land use category which is contained in the Comprehensive Plan does not reference a maximum density. In the General Commercial (GC) zoning district, stand-alone multiple family developments are allowed subject to the RM zone district regulations, which allow a density up to 12 units per acre. Thus, it is inferred that the maximum residential density for mixed-use developments is also 12 units per acre. The West Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Plan calls for two to four story mixed use buildings with either residential or office on the upper floors. Under the current regulations, residential uses would be generally limited to one floor only. The intent of the mixed-use scenario is to provide residences to support the commercial and service uses in the redevelopment area, and to encourage economic development. The increased density should be applied to the West Atlantic Avenue Overlay District similar to that which was approved for the City's Central Business District. However, elsewhere within the City, the density should be limited to 12 units per acre for properties with a General Commercial land use designation, as many of them abut Iow density residential areas and are strip commercial in character with shallow depths. I ~ ~ pLANNING AND.ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION '', ) At its meeting of March 15, 1999, the Planning and Zoning Board considered the Community Redevelopment Agency's request to allow increased density in the West Atlantic Avenue area. There were several members of the public from the West Atlantic area who spoke in favor of the density increase. SUPPORT DOCUMENT #10 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 ESTABLISH DENSITY WITHIN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL LAND USE CATEGORY AND THE WEST ATLANTIC AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT N ~ FUTURE ~ND USE MAP AMENDMENT cnr or ~[L~* ~[~S*. rL - REMOV~ OF ~RGE SCALE MIXED USE OVERLY - ~LANNIN~ ~ ZONIN~ ' ~t~~ t , = / ~.u~.s , / ,!11 I ' ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ I =-I . , . ..~ . , . ~,__ , ~ i ! ~~~ Itlllllltllltl/ll~ I ~ ~ _ : :,.:;;';., ,~/J'!¢' / ' ' .J! ',' ' I._ ;[; 7 ~ / i ~ ~ I / ~ DELAY'S LOST DRIVE-IN c~t~ ~' ~,~ e[,:,. ~ (f.k.~. Dei~y Swap Shop) --- DI~ ~EE MA= S~TEM ---- ~A= REt: L~326 Planning and Zoning Board S:aff repo~ FLUM ,Amendment - Remov=.' .of Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay Designation for De!ray's Lost Drive-in Page 4 O PROD (Progressive Residents of Delray) [] Presidents Council [] North Palm Trail Homeowners Association [] Kokomo Key Homeowners Association [] Town of Gulf Stream [] Oity of Boynton Beach Public Notice: Formal public notice has been provided to all property owners within a 500 foot radius of the subject property. Let'ters of objection or support, if any, will be presented at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting. The Future Land Use Map Amendment removing the Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay designation is consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan and Chapter 3 of the Land Development Regulations. Removal of the Overlay designation is appropriate as the site was recently granted conditional use and site plan approval to redevelop and expand the existing flea market and those improvements are under construction. As this is the only property in the City with this overlay designation, the designation itself is being eliminated from the Comprehensive Plan. A. Continue with direction. B. Recommend approval of the Future Land Use Map Amendment to remove the Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay designation based upon positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. C. Recommended denial of the Future Land Use Map Amendment to remove the Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay designation with the basis stated. Recommend to the Ci~ Oommission approval of the Future Land Use Map Amendment to remove the Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay designation on the Swap Shop Prope~ (Delray's Lost Drive-in) based upon positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Peffo~ance Standards) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. A~achments: · Location Map THRU: DIANE) DO~/IINeUEZ, DIRECTOR OF P~N-~I~~'~(~I~I~ FROM: P~UL DORLING, PR~ClPAL PLANNER SUBJECT: MEETING OF OCTOBER 19, 1999 ** PUBLIC HEARING ** ADOPTION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1 was transmitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for review following a public hearing held by the City Commission on April 20, 1999. This meeting was also the first reading of the Adoption Ordinance (No. 14-99). DCA staff reviewed the amendment and issued their Objections, Recommendations, and Comments (ORC) Report on August 5, 1999. The attached Planning and Zoning Board staff report contains a description of each of the objections and the recommended response. The amendment that was originally before the Commission in April has been revised to incorporate the changes suggested by DCA, and recommendations made by the Planning and Zoning Board. il The Planning and Zoning Board considered the ORC report at a public hearing on September 27, 1999. CRA Director Chris Brown spoke regarding the proposed changes being made in response to the ORC, establishing a percentage mix of commercial and residential uses in the West Atlantic Redevelopment Area Oveday. In response to his comments and the recommendation of the CRA Board, the Planning and Zoning Board recommended that residential uses be allowed to comprise up to 50% of the floor area within the West Atlantic Avenue Overlay, and up to 15% throughout the balance of the GC-zoned areas of the City. The Planning and Zoning Board recommended adoption of the amendment, with the residential percentage change, on a unanimous 7-0 vote. By motion, approve on second and final reading Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1 (Ordinance 14-99) with the proposed changes to address the ORC report. Attachments: · Ordinance 14-99 · Summary of Items Contained Within Comp Plan Amendment 99-1 · Objections, Comments and Recommendations (ORC) Report · P & Z Board Staff Report (Response to ORC Report) · Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1 · Support Documentation S:~adv\comp\991CC3 A summary of the items included in the Plan Amendment 99-1 are listed below: Future Land Use Map amendments including: · City initiated Future Land Use Map amendment for the Delray Oaks Preserve from Transitional to Open Space-Conservation. · City initiated Future Land Use Map amendment for the Delray's Lost Drive-In to eliminate the Large Scale Mixed Use overlay. Future Land Use Element · Modification of Future Land Use Element Policy C-2.1 regarding designated redevelopment areas, to delete the requirement that a Redevelopment Plan be adopted prior to the expenditure of public funds for infrastructure. · Modification of the General Commercial Future Land Use Map (FLUM) description to eliminate a prohibition of residential uses unless they are in conjunction with commercial uses, to establish allowable densities in this FLUM category, and establishing a maximum floor area ratio for non- residential uses. · Addition of Policy A-5.6 that calls for an LDR amendment to the GC zoning district to allow increased multiple family densities over 12 units per acre but not to exceed 85 units per acre as a Conditional Use in the West Atlantic Avenue Overlay District. · Modification of the Conservation land use description to correct the land use designation to indicate Open Space -Conservation versus the current Recreation and Open Space and add a reference to specific policies for appropriate intensities of development. · Elimination of the Large Scale Mixed Use description. · Modification of Table L-7 to eliminate the Large Scale Mixed Use category. · Modification of Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.7 to allow the requirement for data and analysis in support of land use amendments to be waived if associated with annexation. Capital Improvement Element · The Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements (Table Cl-ClP), which is modified to reflect changes associated with the adopted 1999/00 Capital Improvement budget. Housing Element · Modification of Housing Policy A-12.4 relating to adoption of LDR regulations to limit the size and scale of new homes. Conservation Element · Modification of the Needs and Recommendation section of the Conservation Element removing the reference to establishment of an interpretive trail at the Leon Weekes Environmental Preserve as the policy has been accomplished. · Eliminate Policy B-1.3 that refers to development of Leon Weekes interpretive trail. Transportation Element · Modification of Table T-1 to reflect reduced lanes (3 to 2) for Federal Highway pairs between SE 10th Street and George Bush Boulevard to be consistent with the 2020 Transportation Plan adopted by the MPO (Metropolitan Planning Organization). · Modification of Maps #20 and #21 to note 2 lane one-way for Federal Highway pairs from SE 10th Street to George Bush Boulevard. · Amendment to Objective A-4 to reflect Table T-1 versus Table T-4. OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS CITY OF DELtL4Y BEACH PROPOSED AMENDMENT 99-1 CONSISTENCY ~VITH RULE CHAPTERS 9J-5 AND 9J-I 1, F..4. C.. AND CHAPTER 163. F.S. The following objections and comments are raised for proposed Amendment Package DCA #99- 1 text changes to the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map (FLUM). I. TEXT A/~fENDMENTS-Ordinance 14-99 ORC Objection(s): Future Land Use Element O :' 0R'C '0bjeC~ion!' Densities and Intensities of Use-New Policy A-5.6 and'theDenera! ' 'Uommercial land use category, being amended and as established th.rough Policy A-1.1, which establishes the City's land use classifications, do not~c_~.qonta~fficient density and intensi~ standards. ~For mstance,.~...j.q~¢';.u, pper;~lens~ty,_'egthlslkslSed for the residential component of the General Commercml catego~: A1..S~O, there are no.standards~hid'vestabhsh~-the,::mtens~..'oFiase f6~~mponent~o~:.~...gg~g ~ .a~.:,~W!thout thes~dera~ty and xntens~ty standards, the maximum impact-of a plan ~endment cannot be determined. These standards are not o~ffi~?~se~f~6~m~{ m any other pohcy ~n the Plan. [Section 163.3177(6)(a), F.S., and Rule 9J-5.0060)(e)7, F.A.C.I Recommendation: Revise Policies A-1.1. and A-5.6, or include in the adopted General Commercial land use category, an upper limit for residential densiD' that is established in the,. P. lan. This upper density limitation should be established as part of the plan and not through Conditional Uses or through the LDRs. Also, establish intensities of use for the non-residential c.o~rnponent or commercial uses. Possible standards for non-residential standards include floor area ratios, impervious surface ratios (based on square feet per acre), or maximum lot coverage, in combination with building height and types of uses allowed. Delete any references to zoning categories, and, based on relevant data and analysis, establish standards for densities and intensities for the General Commercial land use category.. 1oORC Obiection:' Mixed Use. Standards-TheGeneral Commercial land use 'categoD' by wing two sim~t~e0u~ flies, ~esidential arid commerCiali '~ompriSes a mixed.~i~e.district' The policy' does ~not,.-esta~_. _~li_'~h;..th~_ ~percentage~distfibutiorr among:dae;auix.-of.-the~lwa.;uses.~ Without this standard, the maximum impact of a plan amendment cannot be determined. [Section 163.3177(~F.S.., and Rule 9J-5.006(4)(c), F.A.C.] Recommendation: Determine or establish, based on releva~ data and analysis, a percentage ORC REPORT--DELI~.Y BEACH 99-1 diatribution among the mix of uses or other objective measurment of hoxv much of each land use will be allowed within the General Commercial land use district. "....~-~.-__...;':;.---..-~-~:~';.'...,:';;.:.>~.-"ORC 0biecti°ni Densities and Intensities of Use-Thel. i';".whic!5.~stabli~hesm°dificati°ns tOthethe F _L, UM J e'atego~,_~.e~.r.,~,..e..,c!~.~..e~-'.as_.r_e_I~r~en~.e'9 pY.'.PolicYA: City s land use al~i)f~iit.~/.~s, 4~e..s~i0.£~cp,n.t,a.,[.n~y.,~.ns.ity. and intensity standaras:~ For instance,, there are no upper or lower densitie~e, stablished for,.the.residential use 'of the Mixed Use district;.--There are ~!s_9.~%.s..t?ka_ d~ds,~h i ch estahlisl~m~ns ~e s':~g-~se~fo~:tlS~6n-remdenualmses~at, towe~t.~n, th e- .<M.j~..e_d~4.!~a._t.e. gor~...These standards are not otherwise-founddn any-other policy in the Plan. Wit._h~gt.._th...e'~s.e..~s~tandards, the maXimum impact of a plan amendment cannot be determined. [Section 163.3177(6)(a), F.S., and Rule 9J-5.006(3)(c)7, F.A.C.] Recommendation: Revise Policies A-1.1., or include in the adopted Mixed Use FLUM category, an upper and lower limit for residential density that is established in the Plan. Also, establish intensities of use for the non-residential uses of the Mixed Use. Densities should be based on the type of residence units permitted.and be in terms of dwelling units per acre. Possible standards for non-residential standards include floor area ratios, impervious surface ratios (based on square feet per acre), or maximum lot coverage, in combination with building height and types of uses allowed. Also, delete an5' references to zoning categories, and, based on relevant data and analysis, establish standards for densities and intensities for the Mixed Use land use category within the comprehensive plan. These standards, once developed and established by policy, would permit an analysis of the maximum impact of the development being proposed. -'~ ORC Oblect~on: Mixed Use Standards-The new M~xed Us_e.=l~a[a_ d use category does not.' ', .........,,,~-~o-~ ,-~.-*~. -; ~,...~,~-:.--~ ~,?,;7~ ~:'~-.-~;~'"c.:~'::~::::~-';i:"~.?~-~5',~-,;-'~"~'7.'~-': ~-~'?~: 7~5.-'?,*'. ~'7~.~5,'":~,.~ ':'7. ' .... ~ :. "~" ~X-e'o~tmn a percen..m_ ge d~stnbutLon amongthe.nux orothero.bjeet~ve measurement of the types olr land~ use illowed. The extent of each land use category cannot be determined which doesmm alloW th~ rniiXimum i_.m_.P, act of a plan ~endment cannot be determined. [Section 163.3177(6)(a),/'=.$:, and Rule 9&>.006(4)(e), F¢.C.I . ReCommendation: Determine or establish, based on relevant data and analysis, a percentage distribution, or other objective measurement of how much of each land use will be allowed within the Mixed Use land use category. .~.' ObiSCtion: In~t.e. nsities of~Us..eT~.~...ezn°ddficationslo,the~F. LUM_catego..~, Conservation Land se and Open 8pace-uonsergat~on;:~'feIerencecl oy t°olm?--A:-~l.:% wl'ncg eStabl~slaes the C~ty's 1 ~a¢.. d.i~.e_ ~! .a..ss_i_fications, do not contain any intensity standards. These .intens!ty standards are not otherwise fo~d in may= other policy in the Plan.. Without limits on the amount of develotSment that may take place within the Conservation Land Use and Open Space-Conservation categories, the City cannot be assured that the stated purposes of these two districts will be achieved. [S~'i/fiiSif 16323~177{6){ij,'"Fj&;':i'hd ~iii/;' 9J:5.00'6(3)(e) ~,"F.A,C. 2 ORC REPORT--DELRAY BEACH 99-1 Recommendation: Revise Policies A-1.1., or include in the adopted Conservation Land Use and Open Space-Conservation FLUM categories, intensities of use for the non-residential uses for these districts and which is contained within the Plan. Possible standards for non-residential standards might include floor area ratios, impervious surface ratios (based on square feet per acre), or maximum lot coverage, in combination with building height and U'pes of uses allowed. 6' Lack of Data and Analysis-The modification of Policy A-1.7 which oRC Objection: iAd'all6¥¢ th~ ~aiving of requked data` ~l'~ii~;ii~,~ik i'65'~t'~i~i~'l~r'~b~S'e'd'F-Lf0M-~n~hdrnents r6~ff3i-~"~aTr~[}'~d'°a~-g-~i~"i, Gfii7~'i~-statutory and fule requirements for plan amendments. Pla5 am~fi-dments are requirid to be supported b-Y-~'~ m/lst contain approprFat~ data'and analysis. [Si/c.tl0n ~ 63...3.~77(6)(a), F.S., and Rule 9J-5.00=(2) and 9J,5.006(3}~d)~3, F.A.C.I Recommendation: Leave Policy A.-1.7 as it is. It addresses the statutory and rule requiremehts. The City cannot waive the mandatory requirement for data and analyses that support the proposed amendment and which must be submitted with every plan amendment, whether text or FLUM change. No objections were raised, except as provided above, regarding the balance of text amendments regarding the Future Land Use Element, the Capital Improvements Element, the Housing Element, the Conse~'ation Element, and the Transportation Element. Also, no objections were raised regard the two Future Land Use Map Amendmems. III. CONSISTENCY ~qTH THE STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposed amendment does not adequately address and does not further the goals and policies of the State Comprehensive Plan Chapter 187, Florida Statutes, including the following provisions (Rule 9J-5.021, F.A. C.): ! a)i,Goal.16 (Land Use);.Pgl)ci~. !, 3" and 6. -b)~'G'r~'al"~8 (PuNic Fa. Cilifies),. polio!es 1 and 3. Recommendation: Revise the proposed amendment to be consistent with and further the above referenced goals and policies of the State Comprehensive Plan as recommended elsewhere in this report. MEETING OF: SEPTEMBER 27, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: IV.B: CONSIDERATION OF THE ORC (OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS) REPORT REGARDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 The item before the Board is that of forwarding a recommendation to City Commission regarding the ORC report from the State Department of Community Affairs (DCA)addressing Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1. · Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1 was transmitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for review following a public hearing held by the City Commission on April 20, 1999. This meeting was also the first reading of the Adoption Ordinance (No. 14-99). The items which are included in the Plan Amendment are summarized below and include two amendments to the Future Land Use Map and several text changes and modifications to exhibits (maps and tables). Full analysis of each of the following items is contained in the attached Comprehensive Plan amendment, excluding the changes to the "Other Mixed Use" designation. Based upon the ORC, staff is recommending that those changes not be adopted at this time. Future Land Use Map amendments including: · City initiated Future Land Use Map amendment for the Delray Oaks Preserve from Transitional to Open Space-Conservation. · City initiated Future Land Use Map amendment for the Delray's Lost Drive-In to eliminate the Large Scale Mixed Use overlay. Text amendments including: Future Land Use Element · Modification of Future Land Use Element Policy C-2.1 regarding designated redevelopment areas, to delete the requirement that a Redevelopment Plan be adopted prior to the expenditure of public funds for infrastructure. · Modifying the General Commercial land use description to eliminate a prohibition of residential uses unless they are in conjunction with commercial uses, and to allow increased densities for the West Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Area. · Modification of the Conservation land use description to correct the land use designation to indicate "Open Space -Conservation" versus the current "Recreation and Open Space." · Elimination of the Large Scale Mixed Use description. P&Z Board staff report IV.B. Consideration of ORC Report 99-1 Page 2 · Modification of the "Other Mixed-Use" category to better reflect the Old School Square Historic Arts Zoning District (deleted in response to the ORC). · Modification of Table L-7 to eliminate the Large Scale Mixed Use category. · Modification of Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.7 to allow the requirement for data and analysis in support of land use amendments to be waived if associated with annexation. Capital Improvement Element · The Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements (Table CI-CIP), which is modified to reflect changes associated with the adopted 1999/00 Capital Improvement budget. Housing Element · Modification of Housing Policy A-12.4 relating to adoption of LDR regulations to limit the size and scale of new homes. Conservation Element · Modification of the Needs and Recommendation section of the Conservation Element removing the reference to establishment of an interpretive trail at the Leon Weekes Environmental Preserve as the policy has been accomplished. · Eliminate Policy B-1.3 that refers to development of Leon Weekes interpretive trail. Transportation Element · Modification of Table T-1 to reflect reduced lanes (3 to 2) for Federal Highway pairs between SE 10th Street and George Bush Boulevard to be consistent with the 2020 Transportation Plan adopted by the MPO (Metropolitan Planning Organization). · Modification of Maps #20 and #21 to note 2 lane one-way for Federal Highway pairs from SE 10t~ Street to George Bush Boulevard. · Amendment to Objective A-4 to reflect Table T-1 versus Table T-4. DCA staff reviewed the amendment and issued attached Objections, Recommendations, and Comments (ORC) Report on August 5, 1999. The ORC report contains several objections, most of which deal with a need to specify densities and intensity levels for land use categories contained within the Plan. Pursuant to statutory requirements, the City has 60 days fromreceipt of the report in which to adopt, adopt with changes, or determine that the City will not adopt the proposed amendment. Planning and Zoning staff has reviewed the objections, and has had several phone conversations with the staff of DCA to discuss how each might be addressed. It is noted that many of the objections relate to aspects of the Plan that were previously acceptable to DCA, even through the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) process, and that were not being changed with this amendment. In other words, DCA has broadened the scope of its review beyond the actual amendment language. While this may not seem appropriate, there does not appear to be much choice in the matter if the amendments are to be processed. P&Z Board staff report IV.B. Consideration of ORC Report 99-1 Page 3 The following is a description of each of the objections and the recommended response. Future Land Use Element ORC Objection: Densities and Intensities of Use - New Policy A-5.6 and the Genera/ Commercial land use category being amended and as established through Po/icy A-1.1, which establishes the City's land use classifications, do not contain sufficient density and intensity standards. For instance, there is no upper density established for the residential component of the Genera/Commercial category. Also, there are no standards that establish the intensity of use for the commercial category. Without these density and intensity standards, the maximum impact of a plan amendment cannot be determined. These standards are not otherwise found in any other policy in the Plan. Response: The General Commercial land use description that is contained in the current Comprehensive Plan is largely unchanged since 1989. It does not now (nor has it ever) specify densities and intensities, in terms of units per acre, floor area ratios, etc. It states that residential uses are permitted only in conjunction with a commercial use, but does not specify a density limit. It is noted that the General Commercial zoning district itself, which is most frequently applied to land having a GC land use, allows stand-alone residential as a conditional use, pursuant to the RM (Medium Density) zoning standards (maximum 12 units per acre). The purpose of amending the GC land use description was to a) correct the inconsistency between the land use and zoning descriptions regarding stand-alone residential uses, and b) establish the maximum allowable density. The original amendment language would have limited the density to 12 units per acre. During the processing of the amendment, the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) requested that a greater density be permitted within the West Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Area, via the Conditional Use process and subject to the same performance standards that apply in the Central Business District. At the March P & Z transmittal hearing for the amendment, CRA Director Chris Brown, West Atlantic Avenue Coordinator John Patterson, and West Atlantic business owners Clay Wideman and Lamar Shuler spoke in favor of allowing the additional density. The Board discussed whether or not a maximum unit-per-acre should be specified, but after some discussion it was determined that the ultimate density would be limited by such development standards as maximum building height and coverage, setbacks, minimum dwelling unit sizes, and parking requirements. The amendment was transmitted as attached, with a density of up to 12 units per acre for all of the GC areas except the West Atlantic Avenue overlay, where there would be no specified units per acre maximum. DCA is now requesting that a maximum dwelling unit/acre be specified for West Atlantic. Further, they are asking for maximum intensity standards for nonresidential floor area as well, for all areas having a GC land use, even though the amendment was not addressing nonresidential uses. In order to satisfy their request, staff is proposing that the language be amended to add a maximum density of 85 units per acre for the West Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Area. This maximum is theoretically possible under the GC zoning district development standards, given the 75% maximum lot coverage and 4 story height limit (32,670 sq.ft. / 1,540 x 4 stories = 85 units per acre). The 32,670 sq.ft.represents 75% of an acre while the 1,540 sq.ft, per unit assumes a 1,000 sq.ft, unit and 540 sq. ft. for parking (2 spaces + one half drive aisle). It is noted that achieving densities of this magnitude are very unlikely given the required performance standards, and other requirements in the LDR's. To address the lack of intensity standards for commercial uses it is recommended that a maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 3.0 be added to the amendment language. This maximum is also theoretically possible under the GC zoning district regulations, given the 75% maximum lot coverage and 4- story height limit. P&Z Board staff report IV.B. Consideration of ORC Report 99-1 Page 4 ORC Objection: Mixed Use Standards - The Genera/ Commercial land use category by a/lowing two simultaneous uses, residential and commercial, comprises a mixed use district. The poficy does not establish the percentage distribution among the mix of the two uses. Without this standard, the maximum impact of a plan amendment cannot be determined. Response: Areas of the City that are designated General Commercial are overwhelmingly developed for commercial purposes. However, the ability does exist to include residential uses. As with the density/intensity standards, t~e land use description in the Comp Plan has never stated a percentage mix, and this is the first time DCA has stated that such language is necessary. In order to preserve maximum flexibility under a Mixed-Use scenario, additional language will be added to the proposed General Commercial land use description to allow between a 0% to 15% residential component within the overall district. Thus, individual developments will not be required to provide a mix, rather, the percentage will apply Citywide for all property having a GC FLUM designation. This will require some tracking of uses by the City on a long-term basis to ensure that the stated maximum is not exceeded. ORC Objection: Densities and Intensit~s of Use - The modifications to the FLUM category, Other Mixed Use, as referenced by Policy A-I. 1, which establishes the City's land use classifications, does not contain any density and intensity standards. For instance, there are no upper or lower densities established for the residential use of the Mixed Use category. The standards are not otherwise found in any other policy in the Plan. Without these standards, the maximum impact of a plan amendment cannot be determined. Response: The purpose of this amendment was to modify the current Mixed Use land use description to better describe the Old School Square Historic Arts District. The current description does not specify densities and intensities, but refers to the zoning district for those standards. The proposed language woutd have been an improvement, but again, DCA is now asking for even more specific language. At this time the City is not ready to establish residential densities and intensities for this FLUM designation. As this was more of a corrective amendment than anything, the easiest way to address this objection is to not adopt the revised description. This means that the existincj, poorly written description will be retained until such time that a more detailed analysis of the appropriate densities and intensities can be conducted. ORC Objection: Mixed Use Standards - The new Mixed Use land use category does not contain a percentage distribution among the mix or other objective measurement of the types of land use allowed. The extent of each land use category cannot be determined which does not allow the maximum impact of a plan amendment cannot be determined. Response: As noted with the previous objection the City is not ready to establish the percentage of mixed-use categories in the~ OSSHAD district at this time. Therefore the revision to the Mixed-use designation should not be~ adopted at this time. ORC Objection: Intensities of Use - 'F'ne modifications to the FLUM category, Conservation Land Use and Open Space-Conservation, as referenced by Policy A-1.1, which establishes the City's land use classifications, do not contain any intensity standards. These intensity standards are not otherwise found in any other policy in the Plan. Without limits on the amount of development that may take place within the Conservation Land Use and Open Space- Conservation categories, the City cannot be assured that the stated purposes of these two districts will be achieved. Response: This change to the Conservation Land Use descriptions identifies the appropriate land use designation for conservation parcels as "Open Space-Conservation" rather than P&Z Board staff report IV.B. Consideration of ORC Report 99-1 Page 5 "Recreation and Open Space." Again, this change was corrective in nature, but DCA is taking a broader approach to their review. They have, however, agreed to accept a reference in the Conservation Land Use description that will refer to policies within the Conservation Element for specifics on the appropriate intensity of development for this FLUM category. ORC Objection: Lack of Data and Analysis - The modification of Policy A-1.7 which would allow the waiving of required data and analysis to support proposed FLUM amendments regarding annexed areas is contrary to statutory and rule requirements for plan amendments. Plan amendments are required to be supported by and must contain appropriate data and analysis. Response: All land use amendments Rat the City transmits to DCA are supported by data and analysis, which is included in the staff ~ports. FLUM amendments for areas being annexed are no exception. The data and analysis proposed for waiver in the amendment refers to additional justification required by the City, not by the State, pursuant to Future Land Use Element Policy A.1.7. To address the objection, further clarification has been added to clearly indicate what type of data and analysis may be waived for annexation areas. By motion, recommend that the C.~, Commission approve on second and final reading Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1 with the proposed changes to address the ORC report. Attachments: · ORC Report and Response to ORC Report · Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1 S:\adv\comp\991 orcl TABLE OF CONTENTS CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Page FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT 3 Policy C-2.1 (Redevelopment Areas) 3 General Commercial Future Land Use Description 4 Conservation Future Land Use Description 4 Large Scale Mixed Use Description 5 Table L-7(Land Use Designation Matrix) 5 Policy A-1.7 (Amendments to FLUM) 6 Policy A-5.6 ( LDR amendment to the General Commercial zoning district ) AMENDMENTS TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP 6 Delray Oaks Preserve 7 Delray's Lost Drive-in CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT 7 Table CI-CIP (Five Year Capital Improvement Schedule) HOUSING ELEMENT 7 Policy A-12.4 (LDR Amendments Re: Large Homes) CONSERVATION ELEMENT 8 Needs and Recommendations 9 Policy B-1.3 (Leon Weekes) Page 1 Page TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 9 Table T-1 (Street Network Classification) 10 Map# 20 (2015 Operating Conditions) 10 Map# 21 (2015 Cost Feasible Plan) 10 Objective A-4 (Ultimate Right-of-Way needs) SUPPORT DOCUMENTS Appendix 1 Redevelopment Areas staff report 2 Mixed Use Land Use staff report 3 Five Year Schedule of Capital Improvements 4 FDOT analysis of Federal Highway 5 Table T-1 (Street Network Classifications) 6 Map Exhibit #20 (2015 Operating Conditions) 7 Map Exhibit #21 (2015 Cost Feasible Plan) 10 Density in GC Land Use category & W. Atlantic Overlay District FLUM Amendments: 8 Delray Oaks FLUM Amendment staff report 9 Delray's Lost Drive-In FLUM Amendment staff report Page 2 CITY OFD'ELRAY BEACH ; FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT 1) Location: Pg. FL-32, Policy C-2.1, (Redevelopment Areas) Changes center on deletion of the requirement that a redevelopment plan be adopted prior to the expenditure of public funds for infrastructure. See Support Documents #1 (Redevelopment Areas memorandum staff report) for a complete discussion of this item. 2) Location: Pg. FL-42, (General Commercial Future Land Use Description) General Commercial: This designation is applied to land, which is, or should be, developed for general commercial purposes e.g. retail, office, services. Light industrial type uses such as fabrication and assembly are permissible under this designation when located in the special overlay district between Federal Highway and Dixie Highway, north of N.E. 14th Street to the north City limit. Residential uses, unless they are in conjunction with a commercial use, are not permissible on land shown as General Commercial on the Future Land Use Map. Change: REVISION General Commercial: This designation is applied to land which is, or should be, developed for general commercial purposes e.g. retail, office, services. Light industrial type uses such as fabrication and assembly are permissible under this designation when located in the special overlay district between Federal Highway and Dixie Highway, north of N.E. 14th Street to the north City limit. A maximum Floor Area Ratio of 3.0 is permitted for nonresidential uses. D~o~,~,~,,*~ ........ I,,,-o *~, ..... ,~ .',, Ccmm~rc!~_! on th~ Fut,-rc L_~d Ucc M~. Residential uses may comprise up to of 50% of the total floor area within the West Atlantic Redevelopment Area (GC Overlay), and up to 15% of the total floor area elsewhere in the City with a GC FLUM designation. Residential uses are permitted either in conjunction with a commercial use, or as a stand alone use subject to Conditional Use approval. Residential density is limited to a maximum of 12 dwelling units per acre, except within the West Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Area Overlay where the density may exceed 12 units per acre, up to a maximum of 85 units per acre subiect to Conditional Use approval. ~h~rnct~o 4-0 ~o Comment: The statement being eliminated is currently inconsistent with the Land Development Regulations which allows stand alone residential developments as Page 3 .. 'NOTICE OFPUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF COMPRBIENS .RAll CI1'Y ff DELRA. Y BEACH, The City Commission of the City of Delra.y Bea~h.prop~. ses tl adopt the following ordinance: AN ORDINAIqCE OF ~ Ul'l'¥ COMMISSION OF TIlE CITY' OF DELRAY BEACH, . FLORIDA, ADOPTING COMP~SIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-J PURSUANT'TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE 'LOCAL OOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION ACT', FLORIDA STATUTES SECTIONS 163.3161 TI-IROUGH 163.3243, INCLUSIVE; AS MORE PARTICULARLY .DESCRI~BED'IN EXI-IIBrI' 'A' ENTITLED 'COM?REHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1" AND II~ORPORATED HEREIN BY REFE~CE; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE, A GENERAL REP~LER CLAUSE, AND.AN ~ DATE.. A public hearing on the ordinance will be held on TUESDAY~ OC'I'OBER 19~ 1999~ AT 7:00 PM, (or at confinuatibn of such meeting which is se~ by the Commission), in the Commission Chambers at City Hall, 100 N.W. 1st Avenue, ])eh'ay Beach, Florida. At this meeting the City Commissibn will aC. cep.t public testimony and will consider the adoption of Comprehensive Plan Am~ndmem 99-1. · wbe proposed ~ XME~DMENTS to th; domprebens~e p~n ~ddress .the following-. .. 1. Changes to. the Fire,Year Schedul~ of Capital Improvements, which will be modified to reflect changes a~suciated with the nclopted FY 2000 Capital Improv~mem budget. 2. Modification. lof Housing Policy-A-12.4 relating to the adoption of Imnd Development Regulat~ns (LDR) requirements to limit the. size and scale of ne~v homes:· · · · . 3.. Modification of Transportation Element Table T-I to reflect l~hice~ lanes for Federal Highwayparis (3 to 2) between S.E. 10th Street and Oeorge Bush Bdulevard to be consistent with the 2020 Transportation Plan adopted by the Metropolitan Plannit.Organization (MP0). 4. ModificatiOn of Transportation Element Maps ~/20 and g21 to note .2-1ane ~.d one-way for Federal Highway pairs from S.E. 10th Su~t to Oeorge Bush Boulevard. ' $. Modification of the Needs and Recommendation section of the 'Conservation Element to remove th~ reference to establishment of an inmrpretive trail at the Leon Weekes [~nvirianmeutal Preserve as this policy has been accomplished. · " - · · 6. Eliminate Conservation F~lement Policy B-I.3 that Yefer~ to 'the developmeni bf. ~J~e Leon Weekes Environmental Preserve interpretive trail. . 7. Modificatioh' of l~uture Land Use Element PoliCy C-2.1 regarding designated Redevelopment. Areas to delete the requirement that a redevelopment plan be adopted pripr to the e.xpenditure of public funds for 8~ Addition of Future Land Use Element Policy A-5.6 to acco~umodate in--ed multiple family densities over 12 units per acre as a conditional use in.the West Atlantic Avenue Oyerlay Distrifct. 9. Modifying the Oeneral Commerci$1 land use description to eliminate a prohibition 6f .residential uses unless they are in conjunction with commercial uses, providing for a .density 6f up .to 85 u~its per acre in the West'Aflanfi¢ Avenue Overlay Dism.'ct as a conditional use, establishing a commercial floor area ratio maximum of 3.0, and establishing a maximum, residdntial component of 50% in the West Atlantic Avenue Overlay District and 15% in ~he volume of the Land Ues calegory. lI). Elimination~of the La~ge Scale Mixed Use description... , . : 11. Modification of Futhre Land Use Element Policy A~I .? to affow the requirement for dam ~md a~lysis in suppo~ of land use smendments to be waived il~ associated with annexation. ' ' . ' 12. Other changes of a technical and clerical nature. ' ' The changes to the ~ LAND USE MAP (FLUM).involve two arems of land.as follows: . . PARCEL LOCATION GENERAL' 81ZE IN MAP NUMBER LOCATION ACTIoN, ACRES : 1. Delra¥ Oaks. Northwest corner of FROM: Yransi~ionai' . ' 25,00 Preserve Congre~ AVenue. · ...sw2.' '0p,, sp, Con~erv~ion. 2. Delray'$ L°~! Drive E~$t side of North. . Remov~g ~he I.~rge Scale 7.78 - In '(fks Delray Swap Federal Highway, Mixed U~e overlay Shop) approxirn~t~/500 d~igraUon, .., ...~ feet.north of Allen -.. .: AVenue. . All intgrested ¢itizgns are invited to attgnd :tl~e l~ubli¢ i~aring and corem.hr ~t~pOn compr~l~nsivt: Plan Amgndment 99-1 or submit comments ia writing on or befor~ the date of thc Ilearii~g to the p]anning and Z?0ing I~partment. Copies of the proposed anaCndments to the Comprehensive Plan are available at the Delray Beach Planning and Zoning .Department, City Hall, 100 N.W. 1st Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida 33444 (Phone 561/243-7040), between the hours df 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 pan.,. Monday ttLrOugh Friday,. excluding holidays. ' ' . · , · pLF~sE BE ADVISFa~ .a'RAT ~F ^ PFa~SON DECIDES ~O nI'PF_~L ANY. DEC~ION MADE crrv co~v~ssioN wn~ ~.ESPEcr ~O nNa, Mn~'r~R CONSm~RED AT Tins Imngma, PERSO~ .WmL NEED TO ~SVRE T~L~T A VF, Ra.n~M m~COR~ ~CLtrO~S TH~ EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ~ CITY DOES NOT PROViDE'NOR .PREPARE SUCH RECORD. PURSUANT TO ES. 286.0105.. . · PUBLISHED: The Boca Raton N~vs . - CITY OF DELRAY BEACH. October 13, 1999 . . . ' Alison MacCrregor'Han'y Ad # 793533 Cit~ Clerk NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH~ FLORIDA The City Commission of the City of Delray Beach proposes to adopt the following ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 14-99 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, ADOPTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE "LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION ACT", FLORIDA STATUTES SECTIONS 163.3161 THROUGH 163.3243, INCLUSIVE; AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" ENTITLED "COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1" AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE, A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. A public hearing on the ordinance will be held on TUESDAY~ OCTOBER 19~ 1999~ AT 7:00 P.M. (or at any continuation of such meeting which is set by the Commission), in the Commission Chambers at City Hall, 100 N.W. 1st Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida. At this meeting the City Commission will accept public testimony and will consider the adoption of Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1. The proposed TEXT AMENDMENTS to the Comprehensive Plan address the following: 1. Changes to the Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements, which will be modified to reflect changes associated with the adopted FY 2000 Capital Improvement budget. 2. Modification of Housing Policy A-12.4 relating to the adoption of Land Development Regulations (LDR) requirements to limit the size and scale of new homes. 3. Modification of Transportation Element Table T-1 to reflect reduced lanes for Federal Highway pairs (3 to 2) between S.E. l0th Street and George Bush Boulevard to be consistent with the 2020 Transportation Plan adopted by the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). 4. Modification of Transportation Element Maps %20 and %21 to note 2-lane and one-way for Federal Highway pairs from S.E. l0th Street to George Bush Boulevard. 5. Modification of the Needs and Recommendation section of the Conservation Element to remove the reference to establishment of an interpretive trail at the Leon Weekes Environmental Preserve as this policy has been accomplished. 6. Eliminate Conservation Element Policy B-1.3 that refers to the development of the Leon Weekes Environmental Preserse interpretive trail. 7. Modification of Future Land Use Element Policy C-2.1 regarding designated Redevelopment Areas to delete the requirement that a redevelopment plan be adopted prior to the expenditure of public funds for infrastructure. 8. Addition of Future Land Use Element Policy A-5.6 to accommodate increased multiple family densities over 12 units per acre as a conditional use in the West Atlantic Avenue Overlay District. 9. Modifying the General Commercial land use description to eliminate a prohibition of residential uses unless they are in conjunction with commercial uses, providing for a density of up to 85 units per acre in the West Atlantic Avenue Overlay District as a conditional use, establishing a commercial floor area ratio maximum of 3.0, and establishing a maximum residential component of 50% in the West Atlantic Avenue Overlay District and 15% in the volume of the Land Use category. 10. Elimination of the Large Scale Mixed Use description. 11. Modification of Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.7 to allow the requirement for data and analysis in support of land use amendments to be waived if associated with annexation. 12. Other changes of a technical and clerical nature. The changes to the FUTURE LAND USE MAP (FLUM) involve two areas of land as follows: INSERT MAP INSERT LEGEND Ail interested citizens are invited to attend the public hearing and comment upon Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1 or submit comments in writing on or before the date of the hearing to the Planning and Zoning Department. Copies of the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are available at the Delray Beach Planning and Zoning Department, City Hall, 100 N.W. 1st Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida 33444 (Phone 561/243-7040), between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE CITY COMMISSION WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS HEARING, SUCH PERSON WILL NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. THE CITY DOES NOT PROVIDE NOR PREPARE SUCH RECORD. PURSUANT TO F.S. 286.0105. PUBLISH: The News CITY OF DELRAY BEACH October 13, 1999 Alison MacGregor Harty City Clerk Instructions to Newspaper: Per Florida Statutes, the minimum size of this ad must be no less than 2 columns wide by 10 inches long. The headline (NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING / NOTICE OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGE / CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA) is to be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The ad is not to be placed in the legal/classified section of the newspaper. Thank you. ref:COMPADV2 PARCEL LOCATION GENERAL SIZE IN MAP NUMBER LOCATION ACTION ACRES 1. Delray Oaks Northwest corner of FROM: Transitional 25.00 Preserve Congress Avenue and SW 29th Street. TO: Open Space- Conservation. 2. Delray's Lost Drive East side of North Removing the Large Scale 7.78 - In (fka Delray Swap Federal Highway, Mixed Use overlay Shop) approximately 500 designation. feet north of Allen Avenue. TO: DAVID T. HARDEN CITY MANAGER ~~t F~' --^,t~ ~ ' ' V SUBJECT: MEETING OF APRIL 20, 1999 ORDINANCE NUMBER J4-99 - FIRST READING AND T~NSMI~AL OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 The City Commission initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1 on Mamh 2, 1999. This amendment generally focuses on updating the work program in our Plan; updating the status of various objectives and policies; corrections and general housekeeping; and amendments to the Futura Land Use Map. The items included in the Plan Amendment are listed in an attachment to this memo, and am fudher described in the various suppo~ documents. The Planning and Zoning Board considered the amendment at the Mamh 15, 1999 public hearing. Several members of the public spoke requesting the addition of both a policy and related te~ changes to implement increases in residential densities in the West Atlantic Avenue Overlay District. The Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1 including changes associated with West Atlantic Overlay District on a unanimous 6-0 vote. By motion, recommend that the City Commission transmit to the Florida Depa~ment of Community Affaim, proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1, containing the material in the staff mpod and aEachment. Affachment: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1 S:~adv~comp~991 PZ1 /OA ' A summary of the items included in the Plan Amendment 99-1 are listed below: Future Land Use Map amendments including: · City initiated Future Land Use Map amendment for the Delray Oaks Preserve from Transitional to Open Space-Conservation. · City initiated Future Land Use Map amendment for the Delray's Lost Drive-In to eliminate the Large Scale Mixed Use overlay. Future Land Use Element · Modification of Future Land Use Element Policy C-2.1 regarding designated redevelopment areas, to delete the requirement that a Redevelopment Plan be adopted prior to the expenditure of public funds for infrastructure. · Modification of the General Commercial Future Land Use Map (FLUM) description to eliminate a prohibition of residential uses unless they are in conjunction with commercial uses, and to establish allowable densities in this FLUM category. · Addition of Policy A-5.6 that calls for an LDR amendment to the GC zoning district to allow increased multiple family densities over 12 units per acre as a Conditional Use in the West Atlantic Avenue Overlay District. · Modification of the Conservation land use description to correct the land use designation to indicate Open Space -Conservation versus the current Recreation and Open Space. · Elimination of the Large Scale Mixed Use description. · Modification of the "Other Mixed-Use" category to better reflect the Old School Square Historic Arts Zoning District. · Modification of Table L-7 to eliminate the Large Scale Mixed Use category. · Modification of Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.7 to allow the requirement for data and analysis in support of land use amendments to be waived if associated with annexation. Capital Improvement Element · The Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements (Table CI-CIP), which is modified to reflect changes associated with the adopted 1998/99 Capital Improvement budget. Housing Element · Modification of Housing Policy A-12.4 relating to adoption of LDR regulations to limit the size and scale of new homes. Conservation Element · Modification of the Needs and Recommendation section of the Conservation Element removing the reference to establishment of an interpretive trail at the Leon Weekes Environmental Preserve as the policy has been accomplished. · Eliminate Policy B-1.3 that refers to development of Leon Weekes interpretive trail. Transportation Element · Modification of Table T-1 to reflect reduced lanes (3 to 2) for Federal Highway pairs between SE 10th Street and George Bush Boulevard to be consistent with the 2020 Transportation Plan adopted by the MPO (Metropolitan Planning Organization). · Modification of Maps #20 and #21 to note 2 lane one-way for Federal Highway pairs from SE 10th Street to George Bush Boulevard. · Amendment to Objective A-4 to reflect Table T-1 versus Table T-4. ORDINANCE NO. 1,1.-99 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, ADOPTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE "LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION ACT", FLORIDA STATUTES SECTIONS 1615.3161 THROUGH 1615.15~b15, INCLUSIVE; ALL AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" ENTITLED "COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1" AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE, A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Delray Beach exercised the authority granted pursuant to the provisions of Florida Statutes Sections 1615.15161 through 1615.15~ae15, known as the "Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act"; and WHEREAS, via Ordinance No. 8~-S9, the City Commission adopted the document entitled "Comprehensive Plan - Delray Beach, Florida"; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board, as Local Planning Agency, did prepare an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan entitled "Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1"; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board, as Local Planning Agency, following due public notice, held a.public hearing on March 15, 1999, in accordance with the requirements of the "Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act"; and WHEREAS, after the above referenced public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Board, as Local Planning Agency, recommended to the City Commission that the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1 be transmitted; and WHEREAS, proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1 was submitted to and reviewed by the City Commission; and WHEREAS, following due public notice, the first of two required public hearings on Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1 was held by the City Commission on April ~0, 1999, at which time it was authorized to be transmitted to the Department of Community Affairs for required review; and WHEREAS, a report of Objections, Recommendations and Comments (ORC) has been received from the State Department of Community Affairs and said report has been reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Board, as Local Planning Agency; and WHEREAS, following due public notice, the second of two required public hearings on Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1 was held on , 1999, in accordance with statutory requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, hereby declares its intent to exercise the authority granted pursuant to the provisions of Florida Statutes Sections 165.$161 through 165.$~{$, inclusive, known as the "Local Government Planning and Land Development Regulation Act". Section 9.. That in implementation of its declared intent as set forth in Section 1 of this ordinance, there is hereby adopted the document entitled "Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1", which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference. Section $. That the document entitled "Comprehensive Plan - Delray Beach, Florida" is hereby amended pursuant to the document entitled "Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1". Section {. That should any section or provision of this ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence or word be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. Section 5. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances which are in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 6. That this ordinance shall become effective upon the date a final order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs finding the amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Chapter 165.$18{, F.S., or the date a final order is issued by the Administration Commission finding the amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Chapter 165.$18{, F.S. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final reading on this the __ day of ,1999. MAYOR ATTEST: City Clerk First Reading Second Reading -2- Ord. No. 14-99 TABLE OF CONTENTS CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Page FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT 3 Policy C-2.1 (Redevelopment Areas) 3 General Commercial Future Land Use Description 4 Conservation Future Land Use Description 4 Large Scale Mixed Use Description 4 Other Mixed Use Description 5 Table L-7(Land Use Designation Matrix) 5 Policy A-1.7 (Amendments to FLUM) 6 Policy A-5.6 ( LDR amendment to the General Commercial zoning district ) AMENDMENTS TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP 6 Delray Oaks Preserve 7 Delray's Lost Drive-in CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT 7 Table CI-CIP (Five Year Capital Improvement Schedule) HOUSING ELEMENT 7 Policy A-12.4 (LDR Amendments Re: Large Homes) CONSERVATION ELEMENT 8 Needs and Recommendations 9 Policy B-1.3 (Leon Weekes) Page 1 Page TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 9 Table T-1 (Street Network Classification) 10 Map# 20 (2015 Operating Conditions) 10 Map# 21 (2015 Cost Feasible Plan) 10 Objective A-4 (Ultimate Right-of-Way needs) SUPPORT DOCUMENTS Appendix 1 Redevelopment Areas staff report 2 Mixed Use Land Use staff report 3 Five Year Schedule of Capital Improvements 4 FDOT analysis of Federal Highway 5 Table T-1 (Street Network Classifications) 6 Map Exhibit #20 (2015 Operating Conditions) 7 Map Exhibit #21 (2015 Cost Feasible Plan) 10 Density in GC Land Use category & W. Atlantic Overlay District FLUM Amendments: 8 Delray Oaks FLUM Amendment staff report 9 Delray's Lost Drive-In FLUM Amendment staff report Page 2 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT 1) Location: Pg. FL-32, Policy C-2.1, (Redevelopment Areas) Changes center on deletion of the requirement that a redevelopment plan be adopted prior to the expenditure of public funds for infrastructure. See Support Documents #1 (Redevelopment Areas memorandum staff report) for a complete discussion of this item. 2) Location: Pg. FL-42, (General Commercial Future Land Use Description) General Commercial: This designation is applied to land, which is, or should be, developed for general commercial purposes e.g. retail, office, services. Light industrial type uses such as fabrication and assembly are permissible under this designation when located in the special overlay district between Federal Highway and Dixie Highway, north of N.E. 14th Street to the north City limit. Residential uses, unless they are in conjunction with a commercial use, are not permissible on land shown as General Commercial on the Future Land Use Map. Change: REVISION General Commercial: This designation is applied to land which is, or should be, developed for general commercial purposes e.g. retail, office, services. Light industrial type uses such as fabrication and assembly are permissible under this designation when located in the special overlay district between Federal Highway and Dixie Highway, north of N.E. 14th Street to the north City limit. .............. c),,o;~,,,,,io~ ........ ---, _ .......... ,,,o,. ,h,~,,, ,-. ...... ~o~ ,.,. ,~,. ,-,,, .... ~ .~,..~ ~o,. ~A..,-, Residential uses are permitted in specific zoning districts either in conjunction with a commercial use, or as a stand alone use subject to Conditional Use approval. Residential density is limited to a maximum of 12 dwelling units per acre, except within the West Atlantic Avenue Overlay where the density may exceed 12 units per acre subject to Conditional Use approval. Comment: The statement being eliminated is currently inconsistent with the Land Development Regulations which allows stand alone residential developments as conditional uses within General and Planned Commercial zoning districts. Both of these zoning districts are listed as consistent with the General Commercial Land Use Map designation, and create a conflict with respect to residential uses. Residential densities are limited to 12 units per acre in the General Commercial land use categories. The Page 3 language relating to increases above 12 units per acre in the West Atlantic Avenue Overlay District is being added at the request of the Community Redevelopment Agency. See Support Document #10 for complete discussion on densities within the West Atlantic Overlay District. 3) Location: Pg. FL-42 (Conservation Future Land Use Description) CONSERVATION LAND USE: This designation applies to those specific properties identified in the Conservation Element as land to be preserved. No other land use is appropriate. These properties shall be either placed into public ownership or developed only as allowed by policies of the Conservation Element. They are shown on the Future Land Use Map under the Recreational and Open Space designation. Change: REVISION CONSERVATION LAND USE: This designation applies to those specific properties identified in the Conservation Element as land to be preserved. No other land use is appropriate. These properties shall be either placed into public ownership or developed only as allowed by policies of the Conservation Element. They are shown on the Future Land Use Map under the P. ecr~at!c.",a! and Open Space - Conservation designation. Comment: The Recreation and Open Space land use designation allows for more active recreational use of an area which may be inconsistent with the conservation of the land, It is noted the Open Space-Conservation land use designation is consistent with zoning designations which allow passive use such as hiking trails and passive parks. 4) Location: Pg. FL-43, (Large Scale Mixed Use Description) Changes involve eliminating the Large Scale Mixed Use Lan'd use category. After the modification proposed for the Lost Delray Drive-In (removal of the Large-Scale category) no other property will have that designation. Further, there are no other properties in the City or in the City's Planning Area which are appropriate for this designation. See Support Documents #2 ( Mixed Use Future Land Use categories memorandum staff report) for a complete discussion of this item. 5) Location: Pg. FL -43, ( Mixed-Use Future Land Use Description) Changes involve modifying the land use description to better reflect the uses of the Old School Square Historic Arts District for which it was created. See Support Documents #2 (Mixed Use Land Use Categories Staff Report) for a complete discussion of this item. Page 4 6) Location: Pg. FL-45,Table L-7 The table is being modified to eliminate the Large Scale Mixed Use Land Use category from the land Use matrix. The current amendment includes a land use amendment removing the Large-Scale designation for the last parcel in the City and includes elimination of the text description of the category. See Support Documents #2 (Mixed Use Land Use Categories Staff Report) for a complete discussion and revised table. 7) Location: Pg. FL-23, Policy A-1.7 Policy A-1.7 Amendments to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) must be based upon the following findings: [] Demonstrated Need - That there is a need for the requested land use. The need must be based upon circumstances such as shifts in demographic trends, changes in the availability of land, changes in the existing character and FLUM designations of the surrounding area, fulfillment of a comprehensive plan objective or policy, or similar circumstances. The need must be supported by data and analysis. This policy shall not apply to requests for the FLUM designations of Conservation or Recreation and Open Space [] Consistency - The requested designation is consistent with goals, objectives, and policies of the most recently adopted Comprehensive Plan. [] Concurrency - Development at the highest intensity possible under the requested designation can meet the adopted concurrency standards. = Compatibility - The requested designation will be compatible with existing and future land uses of the surrounding area. = Compliance - Development under the requested designation will comply with the provisions and requirement of the Land Development Regulations. Change: REVISION Policy A-1.7 Amendments to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) must be based upon the following findings: [] Demonstrated Need - That there is a need for the requested land use. The need must be based upon circumstances such as shifts in demographic trends, changes in the availability of land, changes in the existing character and FLUM designations of the surrounding area, fulfillment of a comprehensive plan objective or policy, annexation into the municipal boundaries, or similar circumstances. The need must be supported by data and analysis. This policy shall not apply to requests for the FLUM designations of Conservation or Recreation and Open Space. The need for Page 5 data and analysis may be waived by the Planning and Zoning Director for FLUM changes associated with annexations when the City's advisory FLUM designation is being applied, or when the requested designation is of a similar intensity to the advisory designation. Consistency - The requested designation is consistent with goals, objectives, and policies of the most recently adopted Comprehensive Plan. Concurrency - Development at the highest intensity possible under the requested designation can meet the adopted concurrency standards. Compatibility - The requested designation will be compatible with existing and future land uses of the surrounding area. [] Compliance - Development under the requested designation will comply with the provisions and requirements of the Land Development Regulations. Comment: The City has applied advisory land use designations to areas in the City's Future Annexation Area. These designations were selected given the existing character and FLUM designations of the surrounding areas. Therefore, in most cases when annexations include the application of the advisory designations or designations of similar intensity demonstrated need has been previously established. 8) Location: Pg. FL-26, New Policy A-5.6 Change: NEW POLICY Policy A-5.6 The City shall amend the General Commercial (GC) zoning distdct to accommodate increased multiple family densities over 12 units per acre, as a Conditional Use in the West Atlantic Avenue Overlay District. Comment: See Support Document #10 (Densities within the General Commercial Land Use category and the West Atlantic Overlay District) for a complete discussion of this item. AMENDMENTS TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP Delray Oaks: A City initiated change to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) for the 24.52 acre Delray Oaks Preserve. The request involves a FLUM amendment from TRN (Transitional) to OS-C (Open Space- Conservation). See Support Document #8 (Delray Oaks FLUM amendment) for a complete discussion of this item. Page 6 Delray's Lost Drive-In: A City initiated change to the Future Land Use Map for four unplatted parcels (7 acres) known as the Delray's Lost Drive-In. The request involves a FLUM Change deleting the Large-Scale Mixed Use overlay. See Support Document #9 (Delray's Lost Drive-In FLUM Amendment) for a complete discussion of this item. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT: 1) Location: Pg. Cl 28-30 (5-Year Capital Improvement Schedule) Changes involve modifying the Five-Year schedule of Capital improvements to reflect changes associated with the adoption of the 1998/99 Capital improvement budget. The changes involve deletion of projects completed in the previous years and addition of new projects, elimination of projects or expenditures no longer desired, and prioritization of current and new projects. See Support Document #3 (Five Year Schedule of Capital Improvements) for the completed table. HOUSING ELEMENT 1) Location' Pg. HO-34, Policy A-12.4 (Large Homes) Policy A-12.4 In order to help preserve the character and scale of the City's neighborhoods, measures shall be taken to mitigate the impacts of the "mansionization trend. In FY 97/98, the City shall adopt regulations to limit the size and scale of new homes in order to ensure that they are compatible with the City's existing, older housing stock. The City will provide planning and technical assistance to implement neighborhood-supported initiatives aimed at preserving the character of existing residential areas. Such assistance may involve the formulation of regulations that would limit the size and scale of new homes to be consistent with existing structures within a defined neighborhood, an analysis of the housing inventory to determine if the area qualifies for designation as a historic district, and similar measures. Change: REVISION Policy A-12.4 stock. The City will provide planning and technical assistance to implement neighborhood-suppoSed initiatives aimed at prese~ing the character of existing Page 7 residential areas. Such assistance may involve the formulation of regulations that would limit the size and scale of new homes to be consistent with existing structures within a defined neighborhood, an analysis of the housing inventory to determine if the area qualifies for designation as a historic district, and similar measures. Comment: An ordinance regulating the size and scale of homes failed to pass in 1997. The issue was referred back to the Planning staff and a planning consultant for additional review and input. ^ revised ordinance was considered by the City Commission in November, '1998. After much discussion the Commission voted not to adopt the ordinance. Commission members felt they would rather apply rules to individual neighborhoods, if the majority of residents in those neighborhoods support the regulations. CONSERVATION ELEMENT 1) Location: Pg. CO-8, (Needs and Recommendations) NEEDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Summarizing from the above, the following needs and recommendations are identified in the Conservation Element: · Continuation of the beach erosion control program. · Promotion of water quality and weed control improvements in Lake Ida and associated drainage canals. · Continued pursuit of water conservation programs. · Promotion of water conservation through public education. · Development and/or implementation of programs for the preservation of Delray Oaks, the Donnelley Tract, and FIND parcels 645 and 850. · Establishment of an interpretive trail at the Leon Weekes Environmental Preserve. Change: REVISION NEEDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Summarizing from the above, the following needs and recommendations are identified in the Conservation Element: · Continuation of the beach erosion control program. Page 8 · Promotion of water quality and weed control improvements in Lake Ida and associated drainage canals. · Continued pursuit of water conservation programs. · Promotion of water conservation through public education. · Development and/or implementation of programs for the preservation of Delray Oaks, the Donnelley Tract, and FIND parcels 645 and 650. Comment: The interpretive trail system is currently under construction, therefore the establishment of the trail is no longer an unmet need. 1) Location: Pg. CO-14, Policy B-1.3 Policy B-1.3 An interpretative trail system shall be created within Leon Weekes Environmental Preserve upon completion of the prescribed burn program currently underway. Change: REVISION Policy B-1.3 r n,,;r,,'~n rn~nt'nl ........................... ~#ay.-Deleted by Amendment 99-1. Comment: The interpretive trail system is currently under construction, therefore the policy has been accomplished. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT: 1) Location: Pg. TR-14-18, Table T-l(Street Network Classification) The City desires to decrease the number of lanes on Federal Highway between SE 10th Avenue and Bond Way from 3 lanes in each direction to 2 lanes in each direction. The reduction would accommodate sidewalk widening and streetscape enhancements. Federal Highway is a State road and the request has been reviewed and accepted by FDOT (see support document # 4). The change has been noted on the Palm Beach Metropolitan Planning Organization's Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). The modification of the City's Comprehensive Plan will achieve consistency between the Page 9 LRTP and the City's Transportation Element (see support document #5 for revised Table To1 ). 2) Location: Pg. TR-34, Map #20 (2015 Operating Conditions) As noted above to achieve the desired changes and consistency between the LRTP and the City's Transportation Element modification of the map exhibit is required ( see support document #6 for map exhibit). 3) Location: Pg. TR-35, Map #21 (2015 Cost Feasible Plan) As noted above to achieve the desired changes and consistency between the LRTP and the City's Transportation Element modification of the map exhibit is required ( see support document #7 for map exhibit). 4) Location: Pg. TR-41 Objective A-4 Objective A-4 Ultimate rights-of-way shall be provided per the schedule contained in Table T-4. Setback requirements for new construction along streets shown in Table T-4 shall be measured from the ultimate property line, thus, providing protection of these rights-of- way from building encroachment. Change: Revision Objective A-4 Ultimate rights-of-way shall be provided per the schedule contained in Table T ~. T-1. Setback requirements for new construction along streets shown in Table T '!. T-1 shall be measured from the ultimate property line, thus, providing protection of these rights- of-way from building encroachment. Comment: This is a corrective text amendment to properly label the right-of-way map. S:~adv\comp\991pz2 Page 10 SUPPORT DOCUMENT #1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 REDEVELOPMENT AREAS STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: MARCH 15, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: IV.F.I - AMENDMENT TO FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT POLICY C-2.1 REGARDING REDEVELOPMENT AREAS. The item before the Board is that of making a recommendation to the City Commission regarding an amendment to Future Land Use Element Policies C-2.1, C-2.3, C-2.4, and C-2o6 of the Comprehensive Plan, pursuant to LDR Section 9.2.1 (Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan). At its meeting of March 2, 1999, the City Commission initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1. At that meeting, the Progressive Residents of Delray (PROD) requested that Future Land Use Element Policy C-2.1, be changed so that unpaved streets within designated redevelopment areas can be paved prior to adoption of a redevelopment plan. Currently, Policy C-2.1 states that "until such time as a redevelopment plan is prepared and adopted for such an area, public investment - in terms of infrastructure - shall be minimal." In order to allow the City more flexibility to address the needs of these areas, it seems appropriate to amend this policy. In addition, the scheduled dates for completion of the plans are being adjusted. By motion, recommend to the City Commission an amendment to Future Land Use Element Policies C-2.1, C-2.3, C-2.4, and C-2.6 of the Comprehensive Plan. Attachments: Text Changes Request Letter Adoption of the Redevelopment Plan represents Phase I of the redevelopment strategy for the area. Phase II consists of an economic development strategy to be developed by the CRA, based on the Redevelopment Plan, and a market study. The economic development strategy will be completed by Fiscal Year 97/98. Policy C-'1.6 The following pertains to the redevelopment of the Silver Terrace Area: This area involves the old Silver Terrace Subdivision which contains some mixed use but is primarily single family. It also involves the adjacent land use of the FIoranda Mobile Home Park which is a well maintained land use but which may, in the future, be inappropriate for its location along Federal Highway adjacent to a regional shopping center. The Silver Terrace Redevelopment Plan was adopted by the City Commission on March 5, 1996. The plan establishes Future Land Use Map designations, zonings, and special development standards for the redevelopment area. Future development in the area must be in accordance with the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. Objective C-2 The City, through its Planning & Zoning Department, shall evaluate the continued need for specific redevelopment plans to address the following geographic areas. The evaluations shall be completed, and recommendations presented to the Planning & Zoning Board by the end of FY 97/98. Should the need for redevelopment plans be demonstrated, they shall be added to the Department's adopted Work Program. Until the evaluation is complete, the policies referring to redevelopment areas will be maintained. 1. Wallace Drive Industrial Area 2. The vicinity of Lindell and Federal Highway 3. 4th Avenue, north of Linton Boulevard 4. Area between S.E. 2nd and S.E. 5th Streets, and Federal Highway to Swinton Avenue (Osceola Park area) Policy C-2.1 The areas listed above shall be designated on the Future Land Use Map as "redevelopment areas". , ,,,,.'~,, ,, .... ~, ,; ....... ,~ .... , ..... , ,.,~o,,; ..... o,~,~ o,,,~ m!~m~l. If a private development proposal is made within a redevelopment area prior to the adoption of the redevelopment plan, one of the fo[lowing options shall be pursued: Acceleration of the redevelopment plan and deferral of the land use request until the plan is completed; or, Consideration of the use request on its own merits with the existing zoning and policies of the Comprehensive Plan guiding the disposition of the request. FL - 32 Policy C-2.3 The following pertains to the Wallace Drive Industrial Area: This area shall be primarily industrial (LI Zoning) with an emphasis on commerce uses (PCC, MIC zone districts). The City, through its water and sewer capital improvement program, shall install water and sewer mains throughout the area. Unimproved and underimproved rights-of-way shall be abandoned when it facilitates the aggregation of parcels and larger scale development provided that the right-of-way is not essential for traffic flow purposes. Support uses for the existing automobile dealership uses are encouraged. All commercial uses shall be allowed with the exception of "strip-type" development along Wallace Drive which is not desired because of traffic conflicts along this collector street. This redevelopment plan shall be prepared in FY 98~99/2000 and shall be adopted through a comprehensive plan amendment. Policy C-2.4 The following pertains to the vicinity of Lindell and Federal Highway: This area extends from the C-15 Canal northward between Federal and Dixie Highways. The area does not include the existing (Honda) automobile dealership but does include the mobile home park north of it. Half of the land is vacant, almost half is underutilized as a substandard trailer park, and a few lots have residences upon them. While any commercial use is allowable, the future use of the property is most appropriate for specialized commercial or recreational activities. An effort shall be made to promote aggregation of parcels prior to any further development. This redevelopment plan shall be prepared in FY 87/8899/2000 and shall be adopted through a comprehensive plan amendment. Policy C-2.$ The following pertains to the area on both sides of S.W. 4th Avenue, north of Linton Boulevard. This area involves warehouses, heavy industrial use, sporadic residential uses, and vacant land. The vacant land was platted as a part of the Woods of Southridge Subdivision. Residential use is most appropriate for the area west of S.W. 4th Avenue. Industrial and office uses are appropriate east of S.W. 4th Avenue. This redevelopment plan shall be prepared in FY 98~99 and shall be adopted through a comprehensive plan amendment. Policy C-2.6 The following pertains to the area bounded by S.E. 2nd Street, Federal Highway, S.E. 5th Street, and Swinton Avenue (Osceola Park area): FL - 33 This area has industrial uses with inadequate parking t~.the west, commercial uses to the east, and a mixed residential area which has turned mainly into renter-occupied units. It is also encompassed by wellfield protection zones. The primary focus of this redevelopment plan shall be to arrest deterioration, provide adequate parking and services for the existing industrial and commercial areas, and accommodate housing which is compatible with the other uses. The issues relating to industrial uses within this area were addressed within the new CDB-RC zoning district, created on May 16, 1995. Therefore, the redevelopment plan for this area will focus on the residential neighborhood. The plan will, at a minimum address the following issues: [] Appropriateness of the existing RM zoning district within the area. [] Use of traffic-calming measures to reduce speed and volume of traffic on the residential streets within the area. Potential for creation of a historic district within the area. [] Landscape beautification. [] Improvement of existing housing stock. This redevelopment plan shall be prepared in FY g-7-/98/99 and shall be adopted through a comprehensive plan amendment. Objective C-3 Economic development is an essential component of the redevelopment and renewal efforts which are directed to the future of the City of Delray Beach. Specific efforts for the coordination and provision of economic development activities shall be centered in the City Administration's Development Services Management Group. Those efforts shall be governed by the following policies. Policy C-3.1 The City of Delray Beach hereby acknowledges the role of Culture and the Arts in Economic Development and pledges in pursuit of a theme of this Comprehensive Plan -- A Renaissance Community -- the promotion of the arts and accommodation of cultural activities for economic development ends. Policy C-3.2 The successful development of the Old School Square Project is the cornerstone to the rebirth of the economic vitality of the community. To further accommodate this activity, the City shall evaluate the potential for the acquisition of land in the Old School Square area of the City for the purpose of improving public parking and/or creating a linkage between Old School Square and governmental facilities to the west. FL - 34 PROGRESSIVE RESIDENTS OF DELRAY POST OFHCE BOX 1301 DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33447 HOT LINE 561-266-9400 FAX: 561-498-8909 Mayor Alperin and City Commissioners Att: Diane Dominguez OFFICERS 1 O0 N.W. 1 st Ave. Delray Beach, Fl. 33444 Jean Beer President Dear Mayor and Commission Members, Bill Schwartz Vice President Progressive Residents of Delray voted at their February Board meeting Jayne King voted to ask the city to change our Comprehensive Plan policy C-2 so that Secretary the unpaved streets in our city can be paved by the city. The streets may be in a redevelopment area but the probability of any of them being done by a Gretchen Bacon Treasurer developer are next to non. Eighth Ave and 11 street and the street off fourth Ave. are partially developed and will attract builders if they are Board Me~bers paved. Why 11 street is partially paved and partially not paved makes no sense at all. The one block on north Frederick offLa Mat is another where ltelen Coopersmith the no development will pay for the street. Mr. Columbi owns the square it.lt. B00~inder block on Federal and has access to three streets now. It is time to bite the bullet and help these people. The areas will improve if the streets are Gerald DeFoe paved. Norman ltaslow Again we are formally requesting that the Comprehensive Plan policy be Jo Ann Peart changed as soon as possible. Bill Schwartz. Sincerely, Jean Beer, Pres. SUPPORT DOCUMENT #2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 MIXED USE LAND USE STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: MARCH 15, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: IV.F.1 - AMENDMENT TO FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT REGARDING THE DESCRIPTION OF THE MIXED USE LAND USE CATEGORIES The item before the Board is that of making a recommendation to the City Commission regarding a text amendment to the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan regarding the description of the mixed use land use categories, pursuant to LDR Section 9.2.1 (Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan). Lar. qe Scale Mixed Use: The large scale mixed use land use designation is an overlay district which was created to provide incentives for redevelopment of properties not located within designated redevelopment areas, and which were to be developed solely by private entities. With the adoption of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map in November 1989, the Large Scale Mixed Use overlay district was adopted and applied to two properties on North Federal Highway - the Kokomo Key townhouse development and the Delray Swap Shop/Delray's Lost Drive-In. At the time the Comprehensive Plan was being developed in 1988, a mixed use development known as Marina Cay was approved for the property but was not built. In 1995, site plan approval was obtained to construct the Kokomo Key townhouse development, which has been constructed. In 1995, with Comprehensive Plan Amendment 95-1, the Large Scale Mixed Use overlay designation was removed from the Marina Cay/Kokomo Key property, as it was no longer applicable. In 1998, conditional use and site plan approvals were obtained for Delray's Lost Drive-In (fka Delray Swap Shop), and the improvements are currently under construction. With Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1, a separate Future Land Use Map amendment is being processed to remove the Large Scale Mixed Use overlay from the Lost Drive-In property, as it is no longer applicable. Further, the North Federal Highway redevelopment plan has been adopted which calls for mixed use development along Federal Highway, which can be accommodated under the GC (General Commercial) zoning designation. The Large Scale Mixed Use overlay has existed for 10 years without any developer taking advantage of the incentives for increasing the base residential density or the commercial floor area. As the designation was only applied to two properties, which have been developed under conventional zoning without the incentives, it is not necessary to retain the designation. In addition to the above, as the Large Scale Mixed CPA 99-1- Text Amendment - FLUE Mixed Land Use Categories Page 2 Use overlay designation is being eliminated, FLUE Policy C-2.2 regarding the same will also be deleted. Other Mixed Use: With the adoption of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map in November 1989, the Other Mixed Use (OMU) pattern was applied to the Old School Square Historic District, the Holland property (now Linton Office Park), and until 1995, the Blood's Grove property (now Hammock Reserve subdivision). The OMU designation has a random pattern and the zoning designations do not have to be congruent with the FLUM category. The description of the category is lengthy and references conventional zoning districts through a planned development approach (i.e. PCC, PRD, etc.). The OMU does not provide redevelopment incentives which were previously identified with the Large Scale Mixed Use overlay. While the description references other conventional zoning districts as well as SAD (Special Activities District) zoning, Table L-7 (Land Use Designation/Zoning Matrix) indicates that the OMU designation is only consistent with the Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD), Community Facilities (CF), and Agriculture (A) zoning districts. As the OMU category is only applied to the Old School Square Historic District, the description of the category should be focussed on historic preservation and mix of uses, and all other references eliminated. Redevelopment Areas: In addition, some minor technical changes are being made to the Redevelopment Area category. i I By motion, recommend to the City Commission approval of the text amendments to the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan regarding the description of the Mixed Use Categories. Attachment: Text Changes I · I Other It'll×ed Ucc MIXED USE: This desiqnation is applied to the maiority of the properties located in the Old School Square Historic District, and is specially created to accommodate the mix of uses anticipated in the aforementioned District. The designation is located within the Transportation Concurrency Exception Area described in the Future Land Use Element and graphically shown in Fiqure L-8. The Mixed Use designation accommodates a variety of uses includinq limited commercial and office development; Iow densitg sin.qle family and duplex development; multiple family units only in coniunction with a non-residential use (i.e. mixed use development); and uses such as bed and breakfast, and residentia e inns. Th, ,,.-.,,~ ....... ,.~ ,,,~,* a .... ~ ................ ca*-'"c-".,~ .~ However such .............._ *~'-' '~'-~ .... '~'~o;"-~+;""",, A.. /C)AI'~% ~.l~r,~,,,-,l~ ~ Dl~nn,~,,4 Rcdc'.'clopmc.-.t .~.rcac REDEVELOPMENT AREAS: This designation is applied to those areas which have been identified in the Future Land Use Element as being in need of redevelopment. Development shall occur pursuant to a specific "redevelopment plan" which is to be prepared pursuant to Objective C-2 of the Future Land Use Element. If a development proposal is presented to the City prior to the creation and adoption of a redevelopment plan, that proposal shall be handled in one of the following ways: the application shall be placed on hold for not more than six months while the redevelopment plan is prepared; the application shall be processed on a case-by-case basis with the existing zoning map, the Future Land Use Element, and the Housing Element providing the Local Planning Agency with the policy guidance needed to properly dispose of the application. (Note: A description of each of the redevelopment areas is contained within the Objective C-2 of the Future Land Use Element.) SUPPORT DOCUMENT #3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 FIVE-YEAR SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS TABLE CI-CIP FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJECTS > $100,000 P.OJECT & FU.D IF¥ 1998-99 19S9'001 2000-0 I 200 '021 200=-03 RECREATION IMPACT FEE FUND Southwest Park 0 550,000 0 0 0 Sandoway Park Rest Rooms 20,000 90,000 0 0 0 TOTALS 520,000 $640,000 $0 $0 $0 i I BEACH RESTORATION FUND Engineering 0 0 73,000! 54,500 0 Update Geotechnical 0 I 0 0i 0 0 Sand Pumping 0 0 0! 5,500,000 0 Bidding/Negotiation 0 0 18,000 0 0 Dune Revegetation i 0 ! 0 0 60,000 0 TOTALS 0 0 91,000 5,614,500 0 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION FUND I Improvements 25,0001 60,000 25,000 25,000 36,000 Tennis Center Seacrest Improvements i 125,0000 1,359,280 0 0 AS400 Replacements 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 GIS Mapping , 0 50,000 50,000 50,000i 0 Boy Scout Hut Improvements i 01 25,000 400,000: 0 0 200,000 ! 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Street Reconstruction Sidewalks / Swales / Bike 75,000 ! 75,000 75,000 121,200 75,000 Downtown Parking Lots 55,000 I 50,000 0 0 0 Community Center Addition 170,000 0 0 0 0 P&R Maintenance Compound 25,000 220,000 0 0 0 Police Addition 198,000 0 0 0 0 Garage Addition 0 175,000 0 0 0 Cemetery Maintenance Building 0 100,000 0 0 0 R&R Buildings 125,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 I 150,000 R&R Computer Equipment 199,730 100,000 100,000 100,000 I 100,000 R&R Software / Licenses 80,000 12,000 85,000 0 I 85,000 Swinton Avenue, Phase II Beautification 0 314,000 0 0 i 0 Medians i 35,000 i 0 30,000 325,000 0 Pompey Park Ballfield 140,000 I 240,000 0 0 0 Parks/Parking Lots 29,000 56,000 17,000 0 0 Park Improvements 90,000 452,500 615,000 925,000 0 Lake Ida Road 18,000 345,000 0 0 0 Cemetery Improvements i 0 110,000 0 0 0 Hurricane Improvements 150,000 300,000 0 0 0 800MHz Radio- Police ~ 2,483,000 0 0 0 0 Document Storage / Imaging ! 0 89,000 79,700 0 0 Public Works Emergency Generator I 0 250,000 I 0 0 0 TOTALS 154,222,730 $4,932,780, $2,026,700 $2,096,200 $846,000 CI -28 TABLE CI-CIP FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJE~CTS > $100,000 PROJECT & FUND IFY 199S-99 I FY ~999-001 FY 2000-011 FY 2001-021 FY 2002-03 WATER I SEWER - NEW CAPITAL OUTLAY ES Parking Expansion 100,000 0 0 0i 0 Chatelaine Lift Station 250,000 0 0 0! 0 VVTP Lime Building Walkway ! 50,000 0 0 0! 0 Lab Ion Chromatagraph ! 29,000 0 0 0! 0 NW 24th Improvements i 0 0 548,000 TOTALS i $429,000 $0 $548,000 $0I $0 ~ I WATER / SEWER FUND CONNECTION FEES !' BarwicldLake Ida Force Main 300,000 0 0 01 0 SE 7th Ave. Water Main 50,000 340,000 0 01 0 Lake Ida Road Water Main 0 0 40,000 320,000! 0 TOTALS $350,000 $340,000 $40,000 $320,0001 $0 WATER/SEWER RENEWAL & REPLACEMENTI Small Meter Replacement Program 450,0001 450,000 450,000 450,0001 450,000 Intracoastal Crossings 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 Equipment Replacement Program i 100,000 100,000 00 0 Lift Station Rehabilitation [ 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000i 200,000 Water Line Upgrades 0 684,880 339,820 49,0001 393,760 Sewer Main Rehabilitation 700,000 700,000 750,000 750,000i 750,000 Southeast Interceptor 200,000 200,000 0 0i 0 Linton-Line Relocation 01 250,000 0 0 0 Water & Sewer - NW 18th Avenue 0 0 110,000 0 0 Water District Improvements i 400,000 400,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 Computer Hardware & Software i 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,0001 30,000 NE 12th Street Water Main 144,000 0 0 01 0 NE 10th Street Water Main 112,0000 0 0! 0 NE 9th Street Water Main 105,000 0 0 01 0 NE 5th Street Water Main 105,000 0 0 0! 0 i I TOTALS $2,596,000 $3,064,880 $2,629,820 $2,229,000 152,573,760 I ! MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE FUND ! I Course Maintenance Equipment i 65,0001 85,000 80,000 85,0001 92,000 Other Improvements i 01 75,000 0 01 0 Buildings , 17,000 0 0 011 0 TOTALS I $82,000 $160,000 $80,000 $85,000 i $92,000 LAKEVIEW GOLF COURSE FUND ! Other Machine & Equipment I 5,000 35,000 10,000 10,000i 10,000 Other Improvements I 20,000 22,000 24,000 25,0001 34,000 TOTALS ! $25,000 $57,000 $34,000 $35,000I $44,000 CI -29 TABLE CI-CIP FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPRO~yEMENTS SCHEDULE FOR PROJECTS > $100,000 PROJECT & FUND IFY 1998-99 I FY 1999-001 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-021 FY 2002-03 CITY MARINA FUND Rive~valk 0 0 30,000 200,000 0 TOTALS 0 0 30,000 200,000 0 STORMWATER UTILITY FUND N.E. 12th Street 175,000 0 0 0 0 S.W. 8th Court 0 235,900 00 0 N.W. 24th Avenue 0 0 135,000 0 0 N.W. 18th Avenue 0 0 460,900 0 0 N.W. 1st Street o o 300,000 0 0 N.W. 5th Avenue 0 0 0 136,900 0 South Ridge Road I 0 0 0 495,000 0 Delray Beach Highland Neighborhood 0 0 0 0 742,500 S.W. 6th and 7th Streets 0 0 0 0 575,000 S.W. 8th Avenue - Atlantic to S.W. 4th Street 546,200 0 0 0 0 Seacrest Park 0 330,000 0 0 0 Andrews Avenue Pipe Lining 110,000 0 0 0 0 Ingram Avenue / Venetian Drive 0 180,400 0 0 0 Lindell Boulevard 0 275,000 0 0 0 Albatross Road 0 0 275,000 0 0 Other Improvements i 185,350 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 TOTALS I $1,016,550 i$1,121,300 $1,270,900 $731,900. $1,417,500 VEHICLE RENEWAL & REPLACEMENT I ! Vehicle Replacement i 808,540 900,000 1,000,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 Vehicle Restoration 88,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 TOTALS $896,540 $950,000 $1,050,000 $1,300,000 $1,300,000 CI -30 SUPPORT DOCUMENT #4 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 FDOT ANALYSIS OF FEDERAL HIGHWAY MEMORANDUM To: Paul Dorling, Acting Director of Planning and Zoning From: John Walker, Project Coordinator_~ Date: July 27, 1998 Subject: Federal Highway One-Way Pair The City Manager has requested a reduction in the ultimate section of the one- way pair segment of North Federal Highway (5th and 6th Avenues) from 3 lanes to 2 lanes in each direction. This reduction would accommodate sidewalk widening and streetscape enhancement in the segment. The attached memo from FDOT indicates that the segment will operate at acceptable LOS with the proposed lane reduction. You have already coordinated with MPO to modify their future plans for the segment. It would be appropriate to amend the Comprehensive Plan to reflect the change in the ultimate section. A review of the Plan finds that the following maps and tables may require amendment: · Table T-1 should be changed from 3 lanes to 2 lanes for the ultimate section. · Maps #20'and 21 should be changed to indicate 2 lanes as the 2015 operating condition. These changes could be made as part of the adoption of Plan Amendment 98-1. When the adopted Plan Amendment is transmitted back to DCA for review (with the FDOT memo as background), these new changes would be noted as not previously reviewed. Since FDOT is in support of the change, DCA should have no problem with the change. In addition, as a streetscape project develops, it would be appropriate to amend the Comprehensive Plan further in a future amendment by adding a policy calling for streetscape improvements in the segment. S:\adv\Federall FLORIDA- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LAWTON CH1LE~ TIIO~A~ P. BURY, Jr. GOVg~NOR TRANSPORTATION ?LANN1NG OFFICE - DISTRICT 4 SZC~T~ ~ 3400 W~t Commercial Blvd., 3rd Floor, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309-3421 Telephone: (954) 777--4601; Fax: (954) 777-467I MEMORANDUM JUN i 9 1998 DATE: June 19, 1998 TO: Rick Chesser] ~ COPIES: Joe Yesb~ck, Gerry O Reilly, Mary Conway, John Krane SUBJECT: SR 5/US-I One-Way Pair in Delray Beach Evaluation of Proposed Changes The study corridor of SR 5/US-1 approximately from S.E. 10th Street to Bond Way is a one-way pair roadway with three lanes in each direction. The City of Delray Beach proposes to decrease the number of lanes from three to two lanes (with on-street parking) in this one-way pair section of U.S. 1. The following analysis estimates the Level of Service (LOS) of the study section under existing and proposed conditions. The 1997 field counts were available and projected (year 2020) volumes were calculated by assuming a Cumulative Growth Rate of one percent from the present year. Table 1 shows the existing and proposed volumes on US-1 at two locations - north and south of Atlantic Avenue. In addition, the table shows the expected LOS on US-1 with the 6-lane (existing laneage) and 4-lane (proposed laneage) geometry, both as one-way pair alternatives. North of Atlantic Ave. South of Atlantic Ave. 1997 2020 1997 2020 !Two-Way Volume (ADT) 22,500 28,286 27,500 34,572 iLOS for 6-lane Roadway A A A A (Existing Laneage) LOS for 4-lane Roadway A A A C (Proposed Laneage) Table 1' LOS on SR 5/US-I from S.E. 10th Street to Bond Way Table 2 shows the maximum service volumes for a 6-lane and a 4-lane one-way roadway under different LOS thresholds. LOS 'B' LOS 'C' LOS 'D' * LOS 'E' 3-lane One-Way Capacity x 2 51,840 60,480 64,440 64,440 2-lane One-Way Capacity x 2 33,480 39,960 42,840 42,960 !2-lane One-Way Capacity w/ 30,132 35,964 38,556 38,664 On-Street Parking** Table 2: Maximum Service Volumes based on Table E-1 of LOS Manual * Adopted LOS in City's Comprehensive PIm~ ** Estimated Capacity (reduced by 10% accotmnodate parking maneuvers) - used in Table I Analysis In addition, both the Palm Beach MPO's Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) and Comprehensive Plans include the one-way pair section of US-1 as a 6-lane one-way pair roadway. However, an exception is a section of US-1 to the north of N.W. 8th Street (George Bush Boulevard) which is shown as a regular 4-lane roadway. Finally, a portion of the study section between S.E. 3rd Street and N.E. 4th Street is a Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (map attached). In conclusion, this analysis shows that the study section would operate at an acceptable LOS, even with the reduction of number of lanes from three to two lanes on each leg of the one-way pair. The amendment of both the LRTP and Comprehensive Plans is the most appropriate approach for the City to pursue reducing the laneage on US-1. The Palm Beach LRTP is currently being updated and should be finalized by December 1998. GS/aa Attachments File #4365.01 ?v~F. MORANDUM Date: June 3, 1998 To: William L. Cross, Asst. District Planning Manager, Systems Planning' From: Doug O'Hara, Sen/or Transportation Planner Copy: File c:\work\projtrafi93010\atlantic.wpd Subject: Traffic Forecast for US-1 North and South of Atlantic Avenue in Dekay Beach · Three transportation models reviewed for analysis, CF15, SERPM4, and the work model used for the US-1/Dixie Highway alternative in the Boca/Dekay Area. · Forecast volumes using regression analysis for all model altematives indicated minimal growth. The highlighted columns on the regression worksheet indicate the SERPM4 analysis. · Recommendation for this analysis is 0.5 to 1% CGR for projection. This growth rate suggests a 2020 projection of+/- 32,000. Project No: 93010-xxxx Date: 09/22/97 WPI No: ;41 lxxxx File: C:\WORK1PROJTRAF~93010V~,TLANTIC.WK4 Location: US-1 North & South of Atlantic/Proj. Mgr.: William L. Cross, Systems Planning Type Work: Lane Reduction Year Open to Traffic: 2000 Analyst: D. O'Hara Sin.# 93-5030 & 93-5340, US-1 N of Atlantic Ave Stn.# 93-5027 & 93-5227, US-1 S of Atlantic Ave Historical Costfeasil: SERP.I~,'1 US-1 Costfeasibl SERPM4' US-1 Regressio~ Year 2015 Year 2015 Year 2015 Year 2015 Year 2015 Year 2020 FSUTMS Peak Season ADT 30,900 33,800 28,200 FSUTMS Peak Season ADT 33,100 31,000 27,500 FSUTMS AADT 29,355 32,1;10 26,790 FSUTMS AADT 31,445 29,450" 26,125 1996 Pk Season Adj. MOCA Fac 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pk Season Adj. MOCA Factor = 0.95 0.95 0.95 Axle Adj. Factor thru 1988 = 0.96 0.96 0.96 Axle Adj. Factor thru 1988 = 0.95 0.96 0.96 C D F C D E ~'i ::: F Historical Adj. ~ ' :.!:?.i~' Historical Adj. Year AADT AADT AADT AAD~'i!i AADT Year AADT AADT AADT AA i~ AADT 1987 na 0 0 ~ ?!..0.i 0 1987 na 0 0 ~. I~:.. 0't 0 1988 24,134 23,200 23 200 23,:~00' 23,200 1988 26 448 25,400 25 400 25,400~ 25,400 1989 27,351 27,400. 27 400 27,40~': 27,400 1989 26 545 26,500 26 500 26,6001:.1 26,500 1990 22,480 22,500 22 500 22,500` 22,500 1990 23 758 23,800 23 800 23,800 23,800 1991 22,188 22,200 22 200 22,200 22,200 1991 25 223 25,200 25 200 25,200 25,200 1992 21,694 21,700 21 700 21,700 21,700 1992 29 000 29,000 · 29 000 29,000 29,000 1993 21,200 21,200 21 200 2t,2Q0. 21,200 1993 25 000 25,000 25 000 25,000 25,000 1994 24,000 24,000 24 000 24,000 24,000 1994 27 500 27,500 27 500 27,600 27,500 1995 25,000 25,000 25 000 25,00.0:. 25,000 1995 25 000 25,000 25 000 26,000.: 25,000 1996 ~22,500 22,500 22 500 22,600 22,500 1996 25,500 25,500 25 500 25,500 25,500 1997 ~2.2,50~0~) 22,500 22 500 22,$0~'; 22,500 1997 ~__~,_50.~ 27,500 27 500 27,500 27,500 2015 FgUTI~IS 29,400 32, f00'i 26,800 2015 FSU--TMS 31400 29,500'. 26,100 1998 22,400 24 500 25,100.~ 24,500 1998 26,700 27 300 26,900,; 26,100 1999 22,300 24 700 25,400 24,700 1999 26,900 27 500 27,000.1t 26,100 2000 22,200 24 900 ~25,700 24,900 2000 27,000 27 700 27,200' 26,200 2001 22,000 25 100 26,000 25,100 2001 27,100 28 000 27,300i 26,200 2002 21,900 25 400 26,400 25,400 2002 27,200 28 200 27,500. 26,200 2003 21,700 25 600 26,700. 25,600 2003 27,400 28,400 27,600 26,200 2004 21,600 25 800 27,000 25,800 2004 27,500 28,600 27,800 26,200 2005 21,500 26 000 27,3.00 26,000 2005 27,600 28,800 27,900 26,300 2006 21,300 26 200 27,600 26,200 2006 27,700 29,100 28,1.00 26,300 2007 21,200 26 400 27,900. 26,400 2007 27,900 29,300 28,200 26,300 2008 21,000 26 600 28,20{~i 26,600 2008 28,000 29,500 28,4001 26,300 2009 20,900 26 800 28,600~ 26,800 2009 28,100 29,700 28,500 26,400 '2010 20,800 27 100 28,900 27,100 2010 28,200 29,900 28,700 26,400 2011 20,600 27 300 29,2.00 .27,300 2011 28,400 30,200 28,800 26,400 2012 20,500 27 500 29,S00`.i 27,500 2012 28,500 30,400 29,000' 26,400 2013 20,300 27 700 29,80.0; 27,700 2013 28,600 30,600 29,i00 26,400 2014 20,200 27 900 30,1.0q. 27,900 2014 28,800 30,800 29,300. 26,500 2015 20,100 28 100 30,40.0.. 28,100 2015 28,900 31,100 29,4001 26,500 2016 19,900 28300 30,700 28,300 2016 29,000 31,300 29,600, 26,500 2017 19,800 28500 3!,10~iI 28,500 2017 29,100 31,500 29,~01~'i. 26,500 2018 19,600 28700 31,4001 28.700 201'8 29,300 31,700 29,900 26,500 2019 19,500 29 000 31,700~J 29.000 2019 29,400 31,900 30,000' 26.600 2020 19,400 29 200 32,00011 29.200 2020 29,500 32,200 30,200 26,600 2021 Design Yea 19,200 29,400 32,30b"~ 29.400 2021 29,600 32,400 30,300': 26,600 2022 19,100 29,600 32,600iI 29,600 2022 29,800 32,600 30,500] 26,600 2023 18,900 29,800 32,900] 29,800 2023 29,900 32,800 30,600~~ 26,700 2024 18,800 30,000 33,30(J~{ 30,000 2024 30,000 33,000 30,800i 26,700 2025 18,700 30,200 33,600~.J 30,200 2025 30,100 33.300 30,900! 26,700 2026 18,500. 30.400 33,9.~{ 30,400 2026 30,300 33.500 3t,!00/i 26,700 Compound Growth Rate :'??~.~ Compound Growth Rate From To Historical Costfeasil:SERPM4. US-1 From To Historical Costfeasibl SERPM4,~.~ US-1 Year Year 'i,~-~,~ . :...:._~.~, Year Year ' 1988 1997 -0.34% -0.34°/O -0.34% -0.34% 1988 1997 0.89% 0.89% 0'J~;),'I 0.89% 1996 2001 -0.37% 1.84% ;' 2.~% 1.84% 1996 2001 1.02% 1.57% 1~'!..4.%1 0.45% 2001 2011 -0.60% 0.74% '1.1~%' 0.74% 2001 2011 0.43% 0.70% 0.49%~ 0.10% 2001 2021 -0.65% 0.77% 1.08% 0.77% 2001 2021 0.42% 0 71% 0.S0%1 0.09% R Squared 0.0539 0.3739 0.$~ 0.3739 R Square 0.0601 05538 0.37121 0.0114 TABLE E-1 GENERALIZED ANNUAL AVERAGE DALLY VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S URBANIZED AREAS* STATE TWO-WAY ARTERIALS FREEWAYS UNINTERRUPTED FLOW Group 1 (wilhin urbanized arcs over 500,000 and leading to or passing within 5 miles of Ihe primary cily cenlral business district) Unsignalized Level of Service Level of Service Lanes A B C D E Lanes A B C D E 4 22,000 35,200 52,900 67,000 80,800 2 Undiv. 8,900 13,900 18,900 24,800 33,100 6 33,100 52,900 79,400 100,600 126,900 4 Div. 21,500 35,800 50,100 60,100 71,600 8 44,100 70,500 105,900 134,100 169,200 6 Div. 32,200 53,700 75,200 90,200 107,400 10 55,200 88,200 132,400 167,700 211,400 12 63,200 101,100 151,700 192,200 242,300 INTERRUPTED FLOW Group 2 (within urbanized arcs and not in Group 1) Class la (>0.00 lo 2.49 signalized Intersections per mile) Level of Scrvlcc Level of Service Lanes A B C D E Lanes A** B C D*** E'°* 4 20,300 32,500 48,800 61,800 74,500 2 Undiv. - 12,600 15,200 16,600. 17,000. ¢ 16 30,600 48,900 ' 73,400 93,000 117,300 4 Div. - 27,900 33,3{~0 .35,700 35,800 L 8 40,800 65,200 97,900 124,000 156,300 ~ 6 Div. - 43,200 50,4,00 53,700. 53,700 ' - ^ 10 51,000 81,500 122,300 155,000 195,400 8 Div. - 53,800 62,000 65,800 65,800 s 12 58,400 93,200 140,000 177,300 223,600 $ Class lb (2.50 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) NON-STATE ROADWAYS Level of Service t bIAJOR CIT~VCOUNTY ROADWAYS Lanes A° * B* * C D E Level o[' Service 2 Undiv. 8,800 14,300 15,900 Lanes A' * B° ' C D E 4 Div. 19,200 31,100 34,000 2 Undiv 10,900 14,200 15,500 6 Div. 29,300 47,500 51,400 4 Div. 24,400 31,000 33,200 g Div. 35,800 58,000 62,900 6 Div. 37,800 47,500 50,200 Class II (more than 4.50 signalized intersections per mile and not OTtIER SIGNALIZED ROADWAYS within primary city central business district of urbanized c (signalized intersection analysis) area over 500,000) L Level of Service Level of Service ^ Lanes A** B** C D E Lanes A** B** C** D E s 2 Undiv 5,200 10,200 11,700 2 Undiv. - 11,800 15,200 s 4 Div. 11.400 22.600 25.100 4 Div. 26,500 33,400 6 Div. 40,700 50,600 ADJUSTMENTS 8 Div. 49,700 61,800 DIVIDED/UNDIVIDED (slier corresponding two-way volume indicated percent) Class III (more than 4.50 signalized intersections per mile and within Lanes Median Left Turn Bays Adjustment Factors primary oily central business district of urbanized 2 Divldcd Yes +5% · area over $00,000) C 2 Undivided No ~ -20% L=vel of Service L Multi Undivided Yes -5% Lanes A** B** C** D E A Multi Undivided No -25% 2 Undiv. 13,200 14,800 s 4 Div. 29,500 32,600 s ONE-WAY 6 Div. - 44,800 49,300 Itl (slier corresponding two-way volume indicaled percent) 8 Div. 54,700 60,100 One. Way Corresponding Adjustment Lanes T~vo-Way Lanes Factor 2 4 -40% 3 6 -40% 4 8 -40% 5 8 -25% The tab~ ¢o~-n flor cfnr6"t/tute · ~t,'mdntd and II,auld b~ ~cd only Rue gcflcfal Ftmrdflg applicatlon~ The (based on K.u f~'tof~ not peak to daib/I'atlos) Rat' Jcveb olio'vier., and ate ha.ned on thc 1994 Highway C...apacily Mafiual Update and Flm'ida tralfie, roadway and signalization data. 1'he table's a.-.,~umplions and level o( service ctltefia appear off the bm:k. C. aflno4 bc achieved. Source: Florida Depaflment ofTraruFoflafion, 199~. 95DUT ri&US/95 E-I SUPPORT DOCUMENT #5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 TABLE T-1 (STREET NETWORK CLASSIFICATIONS) >, J~ 0 Z ~ ~.~ '-- SUPPORT DOCUMENT #6 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 MAP EXHIBIT #20 (2015 OPERATING CONDITIONS) L~zl qlC ~-~ D ~ c ~ ,--- ~ F :: ~ ~ c ~ - ~ ~ -- F ~ ~ Ull ~ , ~ ~:: ~: :~,, ~1~,' ~ ~ :: /~ I~ ~ SOURCE: METROPOLITAN P~NNINS O~SANIZATION OF PALM B~CH COUNt, 2015 COUN~ MODEL. --J_ 20 ! 5 OPERATING CONDITIONS upa PRIOR TO PROGRAMMED IMPROVEMENTS ;/2~/~; C[~;~D: MAP ~20 * - ~;o:[c~ m u[~ P~NING ~ ZONIN~ DEPT. i- ~L I- 2L COUNW MODEL IN 2015 P~ SUPPORT DOCUMENT #7 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 MAP EXHIBIT #21 (2015 COST FEASIBLE PLAN) SW 2,5 AVE / N.T.S. LAKEIDA ED r---- ~ ST F J AMTRAK F LINTON BLVD I D I I E LIMITS SOURCE: METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, WP~USA 2015 PLAN UPDATE. 7/28/97 LEGENI3: MA~~1 ~2 ~ --- I OL ....... 2L ONE-WAY )k _ PROJECTED TO MEET NOTE: LOS IS SHOWN FOR R~IS~ 3/5/g9 --- 6L --- NOt SHOWN ON 20~5 ** P~K HOUR STANDARD OVER-~PAC,~ LINKS ON CI~ OF O~Y B~H --- 4L COST F~IB~ P~N - INCONSISTENT W'~ EXHIBIT 16 FOR COMPARISON. SUPPORT DOCUMENT #8 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 DELRAY OAKS FLUM STAFF REPORT SUPPORT DOCUMENT #9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 DELRAY'S LOST DRIVE-IN FLUM STAFF REPORT SUPPORT DOCUMENT #10 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 ESTABLISH DENSITY WITHIN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL LAND USE CATEGORY AND THE WEST ATLANTIC AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT The item before the City Commission is a text amendment to the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan regarding the description of the General Commercial land use category to establish density, and adding Policy A-5.6 to accommodate an increase in density in the West Atlantic Avenue Overlay District section of the General Commercial zoning district, pursuant to LDR Section 9.2.1 (Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan). I On March 10, 1999, the Director of the Community Redevelopment Agency submitted a request that an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan be processed in conjunction with Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1 to allow an increase in residential density as a Conditional Use, within the West Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Area. The CRA has aggregated properties for redevelopment within Block 28 and 36 in the West Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Area, and developers are interested in providing market-rate multiple family housing. The current description of the General Commercial land use category which is contained in the Comprehensive Plan does not reference a maximum density. In the General Commercial (GC) zoning district, stand-alone multiple family developments are allowed subject to the RM zone district regulations, which allow a density up to 12 units per acre. Thus, it is inferred that the maximum residential density for mixed-use developments is also 12 units per acre.. The West Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Plan calls for two to four story mixed use buildings with either residential or office on the upper floors. Under the current regulations, residential uses would be generally limited to one floor only. The intent of the mixed-use scenario is to provide residences to support the commercial and service uses in the redevelopment area, and to encourage economic development. The increased density should be applied to the West Atlantic Avenue Overlay District similar to that which was approved for the City's Central Business District. However, elsewhere within the City, the density should be limited to 12 units per acre for properties with a General Commercial land use designation, as many of them abut Iow density residential areas and are strip commercial in character with shallow depths. At its meeting of March 15, 1999, the Planning and Zoning Board considered the Community Redevelopment Agency's request to allow increased density in the West Atlantic Avenue area. There were several members of the public from the West Atlantic area who spoke in favor of the density increase. City Commission Documentation Meeting of April 20, 1999 Page 3 ,. Staff suggested that given the Iow density residential developments north and south of the redevelopment area, the density could be limited to a maximum of 30 units per acre, with density increases over 12 units per acre subject to a conditional use approval. The Board agreed that the increase should be subject to Conditional Use approval, but didn't feel it was appropriate to establish a maximum. Staff noted that there are special regulations pertaining to the West Atlantic Avenue Overlay District that would ultimately limit the density, such as a 48' height limitation west of NW 3rd Avenue and SW 4th Avenue, and limitation of the depth of commercial/mixed use structures to 150', with a depth up to 300' allowed as a Conditional Use. After further discussion, the Board unanimously recommended that an amendment be processed with Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1 to increase the residential density in mixed-use projects within the West Atlantic Avenue redevelopment area, without a density limitation, as a Conditional Use and subject to performance standards. Once the Comprehensive Plan amendment is adopted, an LDR amendment will be processed to include the language within the GC zoning district regulations. RECOMMEND:ED?Ac, TI By motion, approve an amendment to the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan regarding the description of the General Commercial land use category to establish density parameters, and adding Policy A-5.6 to accommodate an increase in residential density in the West Atlantic Avenue Overlay District. Attachments: Text Changes Request Letter General Commercial: This designation is applied to land which is, or should be, developed for general commercial purposes e.g. retail, office, services. Light industrial type uses such as fabrication and assembly are permissible under this designation when located in the special overlay district between Federal Highway and Dixie Highway, north of N.E. 14th Street to the north City limit.I~J~+;~[~l~l lll~l ........ ~, l, I1~ +~'1,, l~ .......... j ............... ~ .............. ~C .... ~ ............ O~ ........ ~ C ...... ;~ -- *~- c,,* .... ~-"~ ~-- ~" Residential uses are permiffed in specific zoning districts either in coniunction with a commercial use, or as a stand alone use, subject to Conditional Use approval. Residential density is limited to a maximum of 12 dwelling units per acre, except within the West Atlantic Avenue Overlay where the densi~ may exceed 12 units per acre subject to Conditional Use approval. Policy A-5.6 The City shall amend the General Commercial (GC) zoning district to accommodate increased multiple family densities over 12 units per acre, as a Conditional Use in the West Atlantic Avenue Overlay District. · CommuniW Redevelqpment [] Agency Delray Beach MEMO TO: Diane Dominguez cc: Shelley Treadwell Ron Hoggard FROM: Chris Brown DATE: March 10, 1999 RE: Changes to the Cit3,'s Comprehensive Plan Pertaining to West Atlantic Avenue Redevelopment Diane: We would appreciate it if you would consider in yom' upcoming Comprehensive Plan Amendments, the following very important matters concerning West Atlantic Avenue redevelopment: I. The West Atlantic Avenue "GC Overlay" zoning district should more strongly emphasize mixed-use development. Refen'ing to Sections 4.4.9(B)(5) and 4.4.9(G)(1)(b), a mixed-use structure would require SPRAB approval. This should be eliminated. The West Atlantic Plan clearly emphasizes mixed-use development. 2. The restriction of residential on the ground floor should be only for property fronting on West Atlantic Avenue, NW and SW 5th Avenues. On side streets, residential on the ground floor may be perfectly acceptable. West Atlantic Redevelopment Plan calls for two to four stories of mixed use buildings, 3. The with either residential or office on the upper floors and commercial on the ground floor. Under the current limitation of a "RM" density, 6 to 12 units per acre, no multi-story structure could be built. We offer that any project over 12 units per acre would require a conditional use approval. We ask that you add this matter in your Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1. I realize we are asking you to consider these changes at the last moment, but we are about to sell two large parcels, Block 28 and Block 36, and we have interest from market-rate, multi-family developers. Having market-rare housing would be a big economic boost to West Atlantic Avenve. Thank you for your consideration. 24 N. Swinton Avenue, Delray Beach, FL 33444 (561) 276-8640 / Fax (561) 276-8558 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ., NOTICE OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGE 99-1 CI1'~ OF DELRAY B~ACH, FLORIDA The City Commission of the City of Delmy Beach ~ c~-,~r b~e foJIow-k~ on:ltnanee: ORDINANCE NO. 14-99 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, ADOPTING COMP- REHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE 'LOCAL GOVERNMENT · COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION ACT', FLORIDA STATUTES SECTION · ' ". 163.3161 THROUGH 163.3243, INCLUSIVE; ALL AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT 'A" ENTITLED "COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT g9-1" AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE, A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ~; A Public Hearing on the ordinance will be held on Tueeday, April ~e, 1M, AT 7.00 P.M. (or at any .~ continuation of such meeting which is set by the Commission) in the Commission Chambers at City Hall, 100 NW 1St. Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida. The proposed TEXT AMENDMENTS to the Comprehensive Plan address the following: 1998/99 capital Improvement t)u<:Iget. 2. Modification of Housing Policy A-12.4 r~atl~gtotheado~ of Land Deveiol~lem ~ ([.DR) reflulf~/t~llolmlt the~ize 3. Mod~caflon of Tran~oortal~ ~Table T-1 to reject f~:lu~ed I~s for Fedeell f'lighamyl~lm ($t~)t~lw~en ~ 10Th ~met & 4. Mod~catlon of Tm~ Element Map~ ~20 and ~i~21 to nnte 2 lane and o~e-way for F-~ F~ghway PaJm from SE 101~n ~ ~ 6. Eliminate Co~ervat~o~ Element Policy B-1:3 that refers to the dev~ of Leon Weekes Inle~rettve tn~. 7. Modificat~o~ o1' Futura Land Use E~,T,~,T, Po#cy C-2.1 regarding designated Redevelal~ Ama~ t~ dele~ I~e mqutreme~ that a redevelof~m~lt p~an be adopted prior to the expef~lltum of public finds fo~' irffrastmctum. 8. Addltto~ el' Fnture Land Use Element Po#cy A-5.6 to acco,T,T,c,&ate Incmaeed mul~le lamlly dene/~es over 12 untts ~ ~, m a eom~i~:~ use in the West Atla~c Averse Overlay I;)fstrtct. commercial uaes and l:~'ovtding for a density o~ greater ~an 12 untts per ac'm In the W~'t At~anflc Aveflue Overlay dtstflcts as a 10. Ellmlnatlo~ o~ the I.l~ge Scale Mixed Use de~. 12. M,,~.-,~ion of Futura Land Use Element Poacy A-1.7 to allow ~e requlmment to~' d~ta a~l ana~ I~ auppo~t oI' land ~ 13. O~a~' changea of a te~ntc~ a~d ctertcal nature. LOCA~ GE~a~U. $1Z~ IH, ' ~ MAP NUMBER J. OCATION ACTION ACRES · Preserve Congress A_venue · -In(fkal~ray Swap FedemlH~h~vey, Mb~dU~eo~-~y .- ' Shop) Avenue. At this heating the City Commtsion will accept pd3#c testimony and will conakier the transmittal of Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1 to the State of Florida, Department of Community Affairs, for Amendment 99-1. AIl interested parties are inv#ed to attend the pub#c hearing and comment upon Compmhermive Plan Amendment 99-1 or submit comments in-writing on or before the date of this hearing to the Planning and Zoning Department. Copies of the proposed amm~lments to the Comprehef~lve Plan are available at the Delray Beach Planning and Zoning Department, City Hall, 100 NW 1st. Avenue, Dalray Beach, Florida 33444 (Phone 561-243-7040), between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE CITY COMMISSION WITH RESPECT TO ANY MAq-rER CONSIDERED AT THIS HEARING, SUCH PERSON MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL. IS TO BE BASED. THE CITY DOES NOT PROVIDE NOR ;~ PREPARE SUCH RECORD PURSUANT TO F.S. 286.0105. CITY OF DELRAY BEACH April 12, 1999 City Clerk Ad #791289 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGE 99-1 CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA The City Commission of the City of Delray Beach will consider the following ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 14-99 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, ADOPTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE "LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION ACT", FLORIDA STATUTES SECTION 163.3161 THROUGH 163.3243, INCLUSIVE; ALL AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" ENTITLED "COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 99-1" AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE, A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. A Public Hearing on the ordinance will be held on TUESDAY, APRIL 20, 1999, AT 7:00 P.M. ( or at any continuation of such meeting which is set by the Commission) in the Commission Chambers at City Hall, 100 NW 1st Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida. The proposed TEXT AMENDMENTS to the Comprehensive Plan address the following: 1. Changes to the Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements, which will be modified to reflect changes associated with the adopted 1998199 Capital Improvement budget. 2. Modification of Housing Policy A-12.4 relating to the adoption of Land Development Regulations (LDR) requirements to limit the size and scale of new homes. 3. Modification of Transportation Element Table T-1 to reflect reduced lanes for Federal Highway pairs (3 to 2) between SE 10th Street and George Bush Page 2 Boulevard to be consistent with the 2020 Transportation Plan adopted by the MPO (Metropolitan Planning Organization). 4. Modification of Transportation Element Maps #20 and #21 to note 2 lane one- way for Federal Highway pairs from SE 10th Street to George Bush Boulevard. 5. Modification of the Needs and Recommendation section of the Conservation Element removing the reference to establishment of an interpretive trail at the Leon Weekes Environmental Preserve as the policy has been accomplished. 6. Eliminate Conservation Element Policy B-1.3 that refers to the development of Leon Weekes interpretive trail. 7. Modification of Future Land Use Element Policy C-2.1 regarding designated Redevelopment Areas to delete the requirement that a redevelopment plan be adopted prior to the expenditure of public finds for infrastructure. 8. Addition of Future Land Use Element Policy A-5.6 to accommodate increased multiple family densities over 12 units per acre, as a conditional use in the West Atlantic Avenue Overlay District. 9. Modifying the General Commercial land use description to eliminate a prohibition of residential uses unless they are in conjunction with commercial uses and providing for a density of greater than 12 units per acre in the West Atlantic Avenue Overlay district as a conditional use. 10. Elimination of the Large Scale Mixed Use description. 11.Modification of the "Other Mixed-Use" category to better reflect the Old School Square Historic Arts Zoning District. 12. Modification of Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.7 to allow the requirement for data and analysis in support of land use amendments to be waived if associated with annexation. 13. Other changes of a technical and clerical nature. The changes to the FUTURE LAND USE MAP (FLUM) involve two areas of land which will be transmitted as a part of Amendment # 99-1. INSERT MAP INSERT LEGEND Page 3 At this hearing the City Commission will accept public testimony and will consider the transmittal of Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1 to the State of Florida, Department of Community Affairs, for intergovernmental review and comment. Upon completion of that review, an additional advertised public hearing will be scheduled at which the City Commission will consider adoption of Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1. All interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing and comment upon Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1 or submit comments in writing on or before the date of this hearing to the Planning and Zoning Department. Copies of the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are available at the Delray Beach Planning and Zoning Department, City Hall, 100 NW 1st Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida 33444 (Phone 561/243-7040), between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE CITY COMMISSION WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS HEARING, SUCH PERSON MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. THE CITY DOES NOT PROVIDE NOR PREPARE SUCH RECORD PURSUANT TO F.S. 286.0105. Published: Boca Raton News CITY OF DELRAY BEACH April 12, 1999 Alison MacGregor Harry City Clerk Instructions to Newspaper: This notice must be at least two columns wide and 10 inches high with the headline [NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING/ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGE #99-1/ CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA] to be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The ad is not to be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Thank you for your assistance. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: March 15, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: IV.F.3. ITEM: Future Land Use Map Amendment Removing the Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay for Delray's Lost Drive-In (f.k.a. Delray Swap Shop), Located on the East Side of Federal Highway, Approximately 500 Feet North of Allen Avenue. GENE~L DATA: ............................. ......................... Location .......................... East side of Federal Highway, approximately 500 feet no~h of Allen Avenue. Prope~y Size .................. 7.0 Acres Existing Future Land General Commercial with a Large 7~1 volvo i~ / ~ ~ ' Use Map Designation ..... Scale Mixed Use Overlay/-/ Proposed Future Land Removal of the Large Scale Mixed Use Map Designation ..... Use Overlay / Current Zoning ............... GO (General Commercial) _ Adjacent Zoning .... No~h: AC (Automotive Commercial) East: Town of Gulf Stream ........ South: RM (Medium Density Residential) - West: GC/~ ~~,!~, . .~'?. E xistiRg Land Use .......... Flea Market ~ ~~~/~~' Proposed Land Use ........ Removal of the underlying Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay due to the redevelopment of the Swap Shop Water Se~ice ................. N/A Sewer Se~ice ................ N/A IV.F.3. The item before the Board is that of making a recommendation to the City Commission on a City initiated Future Land Use Map amendment to remove the Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay designation from the Delray's Lost Drive-In (fka Swap Shop) property. The subject property is located on the east side of Federal Highway (U.S. 1), approximately 500' north of Allen Avenue. The subject property consists of four unplatted parcels of land containing a total of 7 acres. The property was developed in 1957, under the jurisdiction of Palm Beach County, as a drive-in theater. The drive-in theater continued to operate until the late1970's at which time it Was converted to a flea market. In 1989, the subject property was located in unincorporated Palm Beach County, within the City's Future Planning Area. With the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map the property was given a Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay with an underlying land use designation of General Commercial. On January 11, 1994, the City Commission approved an interlocal agreement with Palm Beach County for the annexation of the North Federal Highway enclaves, including the Swap Shop. On February 8, 1994, the City Commission initiated a Small Scale Future Land Use Map amendment and initial zoning of GC (General Commercial) for the Delray Swap Shop property. At its meeting of April 19, 1994, the City Commission approved the associated "Annexation and Development Agreement'. On May 17, 1994, the City Commission approved on second and final reading the Small Scale Future Land Use Map amendment and Annexation with initial zoning of GC (General Commercial). The upgrades to the site as required by the Annexation and Development Agreement were subsequently implemented. On May 5, 1998, the City Commission approved a Conditional Use Modification request for redevelopment and expansion of the Swap Shop with the condition that a site plan be submitted which incorporated concepts that came from the North Federal Highway planning charrette (held in November of 1977). On July 22, 1998, the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board approved a Class IV Site Plan Modification for the redevelopment and expansion of the Swap Shop. The redevelopment of the site is currently in process. On March 2, 1999, the City Commission initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99- 1. The amendment includes the removal of the Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay from the property. Planning and Zoning Board Staff report FLUM Amendment - Removal of Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay Designation for Delray's Lost Drive-In Page 2 Future Land Use Element- Mixed Use Categories: In the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan, the Large Scale Mixed Use category is described as a designation that is applied to those properties which will be developed or redeveloped solely by private entities. It is an overlay designation, which provides incentives for redevelopment. The land uses which are allowed are governed by the underlying land use as shown on the Future Land Use Map .... A large Scale Mixed Use development shall occur only through the application of Special Activities District (SAD) zoning. Land which has a Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay need not develop in such a manner; but may develop pursuant to the underlying (or base) land use designation. The Swap Shop is the last remaining property in the City with a Large Scale Mixed Use overlay designation. The overlay designations were created to provide incentives for redevelopment, but the Large Scale Mixed Use category was never utilized. Therefore, it has not served its intended purpose. As the property is currently being development under the GC (General Commercial) underlying land use designation, it is appropriate to eliminate this designation from the Future Land Use Map. REQUIRED FINDINGS: Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.7: Amendments to the Future Land Use Map must be based upon the following findings: I~l Demonstrated Need -- That there is a need for the requested land use. The need must be based upon circumstances such as shifts in demographic trends, changes in the availability of land, changes in the existing character and FLUM designations of the surrounding area, fulfillment of a comprehensive plan objective or policy, or similar circumstances. The need must be supported by data and analysis. This policy shall not apply to requests for the FLUM designations of Conservation or Recreation and Open Space. Pursuant to the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan, land which has a Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay need not develop in such a manner, however it may develop pursuant to the underlying (or base) land use designation. A Large Scale Mixed Use development shall occur only through the application of Special Activities District (SAD) zoning. As the property recently received Conditional Use and site plan approval for a major redevelopment under the GC zoning designation, and the improvements are currently being constructed, it is appropriate to remove the overlay designation. After the removal of the Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay category, the property will have GC (General Commercial) Future Land Use Map and zoning designations. Therefore, positive findings can be made with respect to Future Land Use Map consistency. Planning and Zoning Board Staff report FLUM Amendment - Removal of Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay Designation for Delray's Lost Drive-In Page 3 O Concurrency -- Development at the highest intensity possible under the requested designation can meet the adopted concurrency standards. In the preparation of the Delray Beach Comprehensive Plan, the land use designations throughout the entire planning and service area were considered in the overall land use pattern as well as the level of services. The removal of the Large Scale Mixed Use overlay designation will not result in any changes to service demands. [-I Compatibility -- The requested designation will be compatible with the existing and future land uses of the surrounding area. The subject property is bordered by the following zoning designations: to the north and west is zoned GC; to the south is zoned RM (Medium Density Residential); and to the east, is zoned Town of Gulf Stream OR (Outdoor Recreation). The surrounding land uses are: to the north, Second Chance Emporium and Borton Motors; to the west, across Federal Highway, Del Sol Patio Factory; to the south, Kokomo Key (a multiple family development); and to the east is a spoil area for dredging the Intracoastal Waterway (FIND Property). The elimination of the Large Scale Mixed Use overlay will have no impact with respect to compatibility. The existing GC FLUM has been deemed compatible with the surrounding area. i-I Compliance -- Development under the requested designation will comply with the provisions and requirement of the Land Development Regulations. The requested designation is GC (General Commercial) without the Large Scale Mixed use overlay. The approved site plan that is currently under construction was approved pursuant to the GC FLUM and zoning designations, and complies with the applicable requirements. The subject property is not in a geographical area requiring review by the DDA (Downtown Development Authority) or the HPB (Historic Preservation Board). Community Redevelopment Agency: At its meeting of February 25, 1999, the Community Redevelopment Agency reviewed and recommended approval of the Future Land Use Map amendment for the Swap Shop property. Courtesy Notice: Courtesy notices were sent to the following homeowner's and civic associations: Q La Hacienda Homeowners Association Planning and Zoning Board Staff report FLUM Amendment - Removal of Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay Designation for Delray's Lost Drive-In Page 4 [] PROD (Progressive Residents of Delray) [] Presidents Council [] North Palm Trail Homeowners Association [] Kokomo Key Homeowners Association [] Town of Gulf Stream [] City of Boynton Beach Public Notice: Formal public notice has been provided to all property owners within a 500 foot radius of the subject property. Letters of objection or support, if any, will be presented at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting. The Future Land Use Map Amendment removing the Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay designation is consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan and Chapter 3 of the Land Development Regulations. Removal of the Overlay designation is appropriate as the site was recently granted conditional use and site plan approval to redevelop and expand the existing flea market and those improvements are under construction. As this is the only property in the City with this overlay designation, the designation itself is being eliminated from the Comprehensive P~an. A. Continue with direction. B. Recommend approval of the Future Land Use Map Amendment to remove the Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay designation based upon positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. C. Recommended denial of the Future Land Use Map Amendment to remove the Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay designation with the basis stated. Recommend to the City Commission approval of the Future Land Use Map Amendment to remove the Large Scale Mixed Use Overlay designation on the Swap Shop Property (Delray's Lost Drive-In) based upon positive findings with respect to Chapter 3 (Performance Standards) of the Land Development Regulations and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Attachments: · Location Map ~ll~ /_L/ EVARD SEACREST BOULEVARD -- CONTINUING PRESB YTERIAA CHURCH & Gu-'-STREAM DR'V~_ CHRISTIAN SCHQOL TENNIS COUR TS ~,~ ¢C¢OOb CANARY WA~ FO0 T~ALL G~OL~ BOR TON VOL VO N.E 21ST ST. M.S.A. TRACT PLUMOSA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ROYAL PAI-~ BLVD. M.S.A, TRACT N. [ 16TH 15'1~ LAKE AV~NU~N, ,~ N,E. 14~lq $1. (LAKE AVl) "~ DELRAY'S LOST DRIVE-IN C,T~ O¢ DELR^¥ BEACH, FL (f.k.a. Delray Swap Shop) PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -- ~21G'ITIiL 8.4S~- iv/AP S'Y~TEM' -- MAP REF: LM526 GULF STREAM BOULEVARD TENNIS COUR TS ~'~t. 9C¢0ob CF-S FOOTBALL FIELD __ aOLf · Cbo~ ~ GOLf BOR TON -- VOL VO OYERL M.S.A. TRACT PLUMOSA ELEMENTARY SC. DOt CF'S M.S.A~ TRACT 15'n4 AV~NUE N. MD (LAKE N ~ FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT oT¥ or DELR^¥ BE^CH. rL - REMOVAL OF LARGE SCALE MIXED USE OVERLAY - PLANNING & ZONIN6 DEPARTMENT -- D/G/TAt BA~c£ MAP SYSTEM --- MAP REF: LM526 PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CITY OF DELRAY BEACH ---STAFF REPORT--- MEETING DATE: March 15, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: IV.F.2. ITEM: Future Land Use Map Amendment From Transitional to Open Space-Conservation and Rezoning From POC (Planned Office Center) to OS (Open Space) for Delray Oaks Preserve, Located at the Northwest Corner of Congress Avenue and S.W. 29th Street, Associated with Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1 - Transmittal Hearing. GENERAL DATA: Owner ............................. Palm Beach County Location .......................... Northwest corner of Congress Avenue and S.W. 2@th Street Existing Future Land , Use Map Designation ..... Transitional (Subject to Proposed Future Land Use Map Designation... Open Space-Conse~ation Current Zoning ............... POC (Planned Office Center) Proposed Zoning ....... ..... OS (Open Space) c Adjacent Zoning .... No~h: POC & RM (Medium Density Residential) East: PCC (Planned Commerce Center) & CANAL MIC (Mixed Industrial & Commercial)~1' .......... South: RM Existing Land Use .......... Conse~ation area Proposed Land Use ........ Installation of a 12-space parking area and nature trail with an obse~ation platform Water Se~ice. N/A Sewer Se~ice ..... N/A CAN AL L-b8 IV.F.2. The action before the Board is making a recommendation to the City Commission to change the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and Zoning Map designations for the 24.52-acre Delray Oaks Preserve. The request involves a FLUM amendment from TRN (Transitional) to OS-C (Open Space - Conservation) and rezoning from POC (Planned Office Center) to OS (Open Space). The subject property is located at the northwest corner of Congress Avenue and South West 29th Street. Pursuant to LDR Section 2.2.2(E), the Local Planning Agency (Planning and Zoning Board) shall review and make a recommendation to the City Commission with respect to all amendments to the City's Future Land Use Map and Zoning Map. Palm Beach County acquired the subject property in December 1995, with funds approved through the Environmentally Sensitive Lands Bond on March 12, 1991. The City served as the County's partner in an application for State matching funds for acquisition of the subject property. The City has received a site plan application from the Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management to install a 12-space parking area and nature trail with observation platform at the Delray Oaks Preserve. The City's Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designation for the property is TRN (Transitional) and it is currently zoned POC (Planned Office Center), which does not permit the preserve and the associated improvements. Pursuant to Conservation Element, Policy B-1.1 of the Comprehensive Plan, publicly owned environmentally sensitive areas are to be identified on the FLUM by an "Open Space-Conservation" symbol. In order to be consistent with the use of the property and Conservation Element Policy B-1.1, it is necessary to change the FLUM description to Open Space-Conservation and the zoning designation to OS (Open Space). The OS zoning is appropriate for passive parks, such as Delray Oaks. The zoning change was initiated by the City Commission on March 2, 1999, as was the FLUM amendment, which is to be included in Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1. This Future Land Use Map Amendment is being processed pursuant to the twice a year statutory limits for consideration of plan amendments (F.S. 163.3187). P & Z Board Staff Report Delray Oaks Preserve ~ FLUM Amendment and Rezoning Page 2 --~ Land Use Analysis: Pursuant to Land Development Regulation Section 3.1.1(A) (Future Land Use Map), all land uses and resulting structures must be allowed in the zoning district within which the land is situated and, said zoning must be consistent with the land use designation as shown on the Future Land Use Map. As noted previously, the proposed site plan indicates that the park will be developed with a nature trail that includes an observation platform and 12-space parking lot. The proposed passive park and accessory facilities are allowed in the OS zoning district. According to Table L-7 of the Comprehensive Plan, the OS zoning district is consistent with the OS-C Future Land Use Map designation. REQUIRED FINDINGS: Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.7: Amendments to the Future Land Use Map must be based upon the following findings: Demonstrated Need -- That there is a need for the requested land use. The need must be based upon circumstances such as shifts in demographic trends, changes in the availability of land, changes in the existing character and FLUM designations of the surrounding area, fulfillment of a comprehensive plan objective or policy, or similar circumstances. Data and analysis must support the need. This policy shall not apply to requests for the FLUM designations of Conservation or Recreation and Open Space. An analysis of the "Demonstrated Need" is not required since the proposal is a Conservation FLUM amendment. Consistency -- The requested designation is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the most recently adopted Comprehensive Plan. Goal Area B of the Conservation Element states that sensitive lands that provide habitat and contain native vegetation vital to the maintenance of the environmental quality of this community shall be conserved and protected. The Delray Oaks Preserve is one of the properties designated for preservation. The proposed OS-C FLUM designation is appropriate when designated land is to be preserved. Therefore, the FLUM designation change promotes the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Concurrency -- Development at the highest intensity possible under the requested designation can meet the adopted concurrency standards. The highest intensity development allowed by the proposed OS zoning district and OS-C FLUM designations are passive parks. The current POC zoning district designation allows for planned office complexes. Since the demand on public services is far less for passive parks than office complexes, the FLUM and Zoning P & Z Board Staff Report Delray Oaks Preserve - FLUM Amendment and Rezoning Page 3 Map designation changes will have a positive impact with respect to meeting concurrency requirements. Compatibility -- The requested designation will be compatible with the existing and future land uses of the surrounding area. The OS-C FLUM and OS zoning designations will be compatible with the surrounding existing and future land uses. The existing adjacent uses are the Catalfumo planned office center to the north, the Delray Oaks multiple family development to the south, industrial to the east (across Congress Avenue), and the Sabal Pines East multiple family development to the west. The proposed conservation area will not have an adverse affect on these surrounding uses. The Delray Oaks Preserve will generate 39 average daily trips (1.59 trips x 24.52 acres). Given the acreage of the property, the site could be developed as a planned office center with 320,000 square feet of floor area. A 320,000 square foot planned office complex generates 3,245 trips per day. The surrounding roads can accommodate the trips generated by the proposed nature preserve. Furthermore, the impact on public services such as fire protection, water, sewer, solid waste, drainage, and police is also significantly less for the conservation area than a planned office center. The DERM has indicated that the conservation area will operate during daylight hours and will be closed during evening hours. Consequently, there will be no patron interaction with the park during the evening hours. Finally, the use of the property as a conservation area will not have a positive or negative effect on the property values of the surrounding properties. Since the conservation area will have a Iow impact on the surrounding properties, the property values will not be affected due to the proposed FLUM or zone change. Compliance -- Development under the requested designation will comply with the provisions and requirement of the Land Development Regulations. As noted previously, the Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management has submitted a site plan application for a passive park on the subject property. The improvements noted on the proposed site plan are consistent with the uses allowed in the OS-C FLUM and OS zone designations. The site plan application and compliance with the City's Land Development Regulations will be considered by the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board following the requested designation changes to the FLUM and Zoning Map. P & Z Board Staff Report Delray Qaks Preserve - FLUM Amendment and Rezoning Page 4 REQUIRED FINDINGS: (Chapter 3) Pursuant to Section 3.1.1 (Required Findings), prior to the approval of development applications, certain findings must be made in a form which is part of the official record. This may be achieved through information on the application, the staff report, or minutes. Findings shall be made by the body that has the authority to approve or deny the development application. These findings relate to the Future Land Use Map, Concurrency, Comprehensive Plan Consistency and Compliance with the Land Development Regulations. Future Land Use Map, Concurrency and Comprehensive Plan Consistency were previously discussed under the Future Land Use Map Analysis section of this report. Compliance with respect to Compliance with the Land Development Regulations (Standards for Rezoning Actions, Rezoning Findings) are discussed below. CONSISTENCY: Compliance with the performance standards set forth in Section 3.3.2 (Standards for Rezoning Actions) along with required findings in Section 2.4.5(D)(5) (Rezoning Findings) shall be the basis upon which a finding of overall consistency is to be made. Other objectives and policies found in the adopted Comprehensive Plan may be used in the making of a finding of overall consistency. Comprehensive Plan Policies: Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan was previously discussed under the Future Land Use Map Amendment Analysis section of this report. Section 3.3.2 (Standards for Rezonin~l Actions): Standards B and C are not applicable with respect to this rezoning request, as the rezoning for preservation of environmentally sensitive land does not affect the City's Housing Element or involves strip commercial development activity. The applicable performance standards of Section 3.3.2 are as follows: A) That a rezoning to other than CF, OS, OSR, OR Conservation within stable residential area shall be denied. The subject property is located along a principal arterial roadway (Congress Avenue). The surrounding existing land uses are a planned office park to the north, multiple family residential to the south and west, and a planned commerce center and industrial complex to the east (across Congress Avenue). The Delray Oaks Preserve is not located within a residential area but is adjacent to neighborhoods designated as stable residential on the Residential Neighborhood Categorization Map. The proposed rezoning is to OS, therefore a positive finding with respect to this standard can be made. P & Z Board Staff Report Delray Oaks Preserve - FLUM Amendment and Rezoning Page 5 ,. D) That the rezoning shall result in allowing land uses which are deemed compatible with adjacent and nearby land uses both existing and proposed; or that if an incompatibility may occur, that sufficient regulations exist to properly mitigate adverse impacts from the new use. The proposed rezoning will implement the City's Conservation designation of the subject property. According to Table L-7 of the Future Land Use Element, the OS zone designation is compatible with the FLUM designations of the adjacent residential and commercial properties. As noted previously, the uses permitted in the OS zoning district are passive parks or water bodies. The passive park proposed by Palm Beach County is consistent with the proposed Zoning Map designation and the surrounding uses. The accessory facilities associated with the passive park such as parking will be considered via the site plan process in accordance with the City's Land Development Regulations. Section 2.4.5(D)(5) (Rezoning Findings): Pursuant to Section 2.4.5(D)(5), in addition to the provisions of Section 3.1.1, the City Commission must make a finding that the rezoning fulfills one of the reasons for which the rezoning change is being sought. These reasons include the following: a. That the zoning had previously been changed, or was originally established, in error; b. That there has been a change in circumstances which make the current zoning inappropriate; c. That the requested zoning is of similar intensity as allowed under the Future Land Use Map and that it is more appropriate for the property based upon circumstances particular to the site and/or neighborhood. The proposed OS zone designation is allowed under both the current TRN (Transitional) and the proposed OS-C FLUM designations. Given the proposed use of the property, the OS zone and OS-C FLUM designations are more appropriate for the property. The OS zone designation change from POC will ensure that the property is utilized as a passive park rather than for office uses. Consequently, a positive finding with respect to (b) can be made since the purchase of the property by DERM for the purpose of establishing a passive park changes the circumstances with respect to appropriateness of the zoning designation. Furthermore, the OS zoning designation is more appropriate as passive parks are not allowed uses in the POC zoning district. P & Z Board Staff Report Delray Oaks Preserve - FLUM Amendment and Rezoning ~ --~ Page 6 The subject property is not within a geographical area requiring review by the Community Redevelopment Agency, Downtown Development Authority or the Historic Preservation Board. Courtesy Notices: Courtesy notices have been provided to the following civic and homeowners associations: Progressive Residents of Delray (PROD) Delray Racquet Club Palms of Delray Lake Delray Apartments Town & Country Estates Tropic Palms Public Notice: Formal public notice has been provided to property owners within a 500' radius of the subject property. Letters of objection and support, if any, will be presented at the Planning and Zoning Board meeting. The proposed passive park is incompatible with the current POC zoning designation, as it is not a permitted use. The appropriate zoning designation for passive parks is the OS zoning district. While the TRN FLUM designation can be applied for either planned office complexes or passive parks, the most appropriate FLUM designation is the OS-C designation as it will ensure that the property remains in its natural state and is not allowed to be developed. Positive findings can be made with respect to Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.7 of the Comprehensive, and Sections 3.1.1, 3.3.2 (Standards for Rezoning Actions) and 2.4.5(D)(5) of the Land Development Regulations, and the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. A. Continue with direction. B. Recommend to the City Commission approval of the Future Land Use Map amendments-from TRN to OS-C, and the rezoning from POC to OS based upon positive findings with Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.7 of the Comprehensive Plan (FLUM Amendment Findings), Sections 3.1.1, 3.3.2 (Standards for Rezoning Actions) and 2.4.5(D)(5) of the Land Development Regulations, and the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. P & Z Board Staff Report Delray Oaks Preserve - FLUM Amendment and Rezoning Page 7 C. Recommend to the City Commission denial of the Future Land Use Map amendments from TRN to OS-C, and the rezoning from POC to OS based upon a failure to make positive findings with Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.7 of the Comprehensive Plan (FLUM Amendment Findings), and Section 2.4.5(D)(5) of the Land Development Regulations, that the FLUM amendment and rezoning fail to fulfill one of the basis for which a FLUM amendment or rezoning should be granted. Recommend to the City Commission approval of the Future Land Use Map amendment from TRN to OS-C, and the rezoning from POC to OS based upon positive findings with Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.7 of the Comprehensive Plan (FLUM Amendment Findings), Sections 3.1.1, 3.3.2 (Standards for Rezoning Actions) and 2.4.5(D)(5) of the Land Development Regulations, and Goal Area "B" of the Comprehensive Plan, Conservation Element. Attachments: Future Land Use Map Zoning Map ~ IIII I L._ H,~RBD~ ~ ~ !' I O:-?ICE I I Mi, i ~ DEPO~ " CANAL ~H~CLE I , N - FUTURE ~ FROM: TRN ~NSITIONAL) TO: OS-C (OPEN SPACE-CONSERVATION) CiTY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL PLANNING ~ ZONING DEDAR~MENT SUBJECT TO CONSERVATION POLICY ~1.1 '~' '\ ,; /"}//I 'f / ---,~ ~ lift I L...,~:,~ ~~/// ( ~~~ I /il/ ~ C A N A L ~ - REZONING - c~ ~ ~[L,,~ a[~c,.. :: FROM: POC (P~NNED OFFICE CENTER) TO: OS (OPEN SPACE) D~ANNIN~ ~ ZDNIN~ FROM: PAUL DORLING, P~NClPAL PLANNER SUBJECT: MEETING OF MARCH 2, 1999 ** CONSENT AGENDA** INTIATION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 99-1 The action requested of the City Commission is initiation of Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1. Pursuant to LDR Section 9.2.1, amendments to the Plan must be formally initiated by the City Commission. This amendment generally focuses on updating the work program in our Plan; updating the status of various objectives and policies; corrections and general housekeeping; and amendments to the Future Land Use Map. The items suggested for inclusion in the Plan Amendment are listed below: · The Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements, which will be modified to reflect changes associated with the adopted 1998/99 Capital Improvement budget. · City initiated Future Land Use Map amendment for the Delray Oak Preserve from Transitional to Open Space-Conservation. · City initiated Future Land Use Map amendment for the Delray Swap Shop to eliminate the underlying Large Scale Mixed Use category. · Modification of Housing Policy A-12.4 relating to adoption of LDR regulations to limit the size and scale of new homes. · Modification of Transportation Element Table T-1 to reflect reduced lanes (3 to2) for Federal Highway pairs between SE 10th Street and George Bush Boulevard to be consistent with the 2020 Transportation Plan adopted by the MPO (Metropolitan Planning Organization). · Modification of Transportation Element Maps #20 and #21 to note 2 lane one-way for Federal Highway pairs from SE 10th Street to George Bush Boulevard. · Modification of the Needs and Recommendation section of the Conservation Element removing the reference to establishment of an interpretive trail at the Leon Weekes Environmental Preserve as the policy has been accomplished. · Eliminate Conservation Element Policy B-1.3 that refers to development of Leon Weekes interpretive trail. · Minor text changes which include; · Amendment to Transportation Element Objective A-4 to reflect Table T-1 versus Table T-4. · Modifying the General Commercial land use description in the Future Land Use Element to eliminate a prohibition of residential uses unless they are in conjunction with commercial uses. · Modification of the Conservation land use description in the Future Land Use Element to correct the land use designation to indicate Open Space -Conservation versus the current Recreation and Open Space. · Elimination of the Large Scale Mixed Use description from the Future Land Use Element. · Modification of the Other Mixed-Use category in the Future Land Use Element to better reflect the Old School Square Historic Arts Zoning District. · Modification of Table L-7 to eliminate the Large Scale Mixed Use category. · Modification of Future Land Use Element Policy A-1.7 to allow the requirement for data and analysis in support of land use amendments to be waived if associated with annexation. The tentative schedule for processing Plan Amendment 99-1 is as follows: ,? 'March 2, 1999 Initiation by City Commission March 15, 1999 Planning and Zoning Board Hearing April 6, 1999 City Commission Transmittal Public Hearing Late May Receipt of ORC Report Early July Adoption The Planning and Zoning Board considered the initiation request at their meeting of February 22, 1999. There was no discussion by the public and the Board unanimously recommended approval on a 6-0 vote (Eliopoulos absent). By motion, approve the initiation of Comprehensive Plan Amendment 99-1, containing the material stated in this staff report. Adv/comp/99iniL2