16-93 ORDINANCE NO. 16-93
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 4, "ZONING
REGULATIONS", SECTION 4.3.4(K), "DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
MATRIX", OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE
CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELHAY BEACH,
FLORIDA, TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED REAR SETBACK FOR
DUPLEXES IN THE RL AND RM ZONING DISTRICTS FROM 25
FEET TO 15 FEET; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE, A GENERAL
REPEALER CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to LDR Section 1.1.6, the Planning and
Zoning Board reviewed the subject matter at its meeting of January
11, 1993, and has forwarded the change with a recommendation of
approval; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Florida Statute 163.3174(1) (c), the
Planning and Zoning Board, sitting as the Local Planning Agency, has
determined that the change is consistent with, and furthers the
objectives and policies of, the Comprehensive Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Chapter 4, "Zoning Regulations", Article
4.3, "District Regulations, General Provisions", Section 4.3.4, "Base
District Development Standards", Subsection 4.3.4(K), "Development
Standards Matrix", of the Land Development Regulations of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, be, and the same is
hereby amended to read as follows:
SETBACKS
FRONT SIDE STREET SIDE INTERIOR REAR
Low-Medium
Density
RL (5)
Multi-family 25 25 15 25
Dup 1 ex 2--5 2-5 1~5 1-5
Medium/Medium-High
Density
RM (5)
Multi-family 25 25 15 25
Duplex 2--5 2-5 1~5 1-5
(5) The provisions for the R-1-A District shall apply for single
family dwellings.
Section 2. That should any section or provision of this
ordinance or any portion 'thereof, any paragraph, sentence or word be
declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a
whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid.
Section 3. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances
which are in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
Section 4. That this ordinance shall become effective ten (10)
days after its passage on second and final reading.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final
reading on this the 9th day of February , 1993.
ATTEST:
Cit~ Clerk~ ;
First Reading January 26. 1993
Second Reading February 9, 1993
- 2 - Ord. No. 16-93
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER ~.~v1
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # /O ~ - MEETING OF FEBRUARy 9, ~993
ORDINANCE NO. 16-93
DATE: February 5, 1993
This is the second reading of an ordinance which amends Section
4.3.4(K), Development Standards Matrix, of the Land Development
Regulations, to reduce the required rear setback for duplexes in the
RL and RM zoning districts from 25 feet to 15 feet. The background
and rationale for this proposal is outlined in the accompanying staff
report.
The Planning and Zoning Board at their January llth meeting
recommended approval.
At the January 26th regular meeting, Ordinance No. 16-93 was passed on
first reading by a 5-0 vote.
Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 16-93 on second and final reading.
ORDINANCE NO. 16-93
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 4, "ZONING
REGULATIONS", SECTION 4.3.4(K), "DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
MATRIX", OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE
CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELHAY BEACH,
FLORIDA, TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED REAR SETBACK FOR
DUPLEXES IN THE RL AND RM ZONING DISTRICTS FROM 25
FEET TO 15 FEET; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE, A GENERAL
REPEALER CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to LDR Section 1.1.6, the Planning and
Zoning Board reviewed the subject matter at its meeting of January
11, 1993, and has forwarded the change with a recommendation of
approval; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Florida Statute 163.3174(1) (c), the
Planning and Zoning Board, sitting as the Local Planning Agency, has
determined that the change is consistent with, and furthers the
objectives and policies of, the Comprehensive Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Chapter 4, "Zoning Regulations", Article
4.3, "District Regulations, General Provisions", Section 4.3.4, "Sase
District Development Standards", Subsection 4.3.4(K), "Development
Standards Matrix", of the Land Development Regulations of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, be, and the same is
hereby amended to read as follows:
SETBACKS
FRONT SIDE STREET SIDE INTERIOR REAR
Low-Medium
Density
RL (5)
Multi-family 25 25 15 25
Dup 1 e x 2_~5 2~5 1--5 1_~5
Medium/Medium-High
Density
RM (5)
Multi-family 25 25 15 25
Duplex 2~5 2-5 1-5 1_~5
(5) The provisions for the R-1-A District shall apply for single
family dwellings.
Section 2. That should any section or provision of this
ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence or word be
declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a
whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid.
Section 3. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances
which are in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
Section 4. That this ordinance shall become effective ten (10)
days after its passage on second and final reading.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final
reading on this the day of , 1993.
MAYOR
ATTE S T:
City Clerk
First Reading
Second Reading
- 2 - Ord. No. 16-93
CITY COMMISSION DOCUMENTATION
TO: /'~Th%VID T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER
THRU: ~ .... DAVID J. KOVACS, DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING
FROM: DIANE DOMINGUEZ, PLANNER II
SUBJECT: MEETING OF JANUARY 26, 1993
FIRST READING~ ORDINANCE AMENDING LDRs SECTION
4.3.4(K)~ DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MATRIX~ TO REDUCE THE
REQUIRED REAR SETBACK FOR DUPLEXES IN THE RL AND RM
ZONING DISTRICTS FROM 25' TO 15'.
ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION:
The action requested of the City Commission is that of
aDproval on first reading, of an ordinance modifying the
City's Land Development Regulations (LDRs).
The affected Section is:
* 4.3.4(K): Development Standards Matrix
BACKGROUND:
This requested change came about following a request made by the
Woodlake Homeowners Association (formerly Homewood Lakes), to
allow a reduced rear setback for units in their subdivision.
The Woodlake subdivision, which is zoned RL (Low Density
Residential), consists of 272 duplex structures and 23 single
family homes. Members of the association have asked for a
reduction in the setback requirement for duplexes from 25' to
15', to allow residents to add screen porch enclosures to the
rear of their homes.
RM and RL districts currently require a 25 foot rear setback for
multi-family structures and duplexes, but allow a 10' rear
setback for single family homes. A duplex is similar in
intensity to a single family home. It is reasonable to allow
less of a rear setback for a duplex than that which is required
for a multi-family development. Reducing the rear setback to
15' would maintain adequate open space between buildings. The
Planning and Zoning Board Staff Report provides additional
information regarding the setback reduction.
City Commission Documentation
First Reading, Ordinance Amending LDRs 4.3.4(K)
Reducing Rear Setback Requirements for Duplexes
Page 2
The proposed revision affects the Development Standards Matrix,
which provides a summary of development standards for all zoning
districts. Concurrent with this revision will be the addition
of a note which states that single family homes in the RL and RM
districts are to be built in accordance with the standards of
the R-1-A district. That information is currently provided
separately in the regulations for those two districts, however,
it would be helpful to reference the information on the matrix
as well.
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION:
The Planning and Zoning Board formally reviewed this item at a
Special Meeting held on January 11, 1993. Ted Charney of the
Woodlake Homeowners Association addressed the item and supported
the proposed text. The Board then forwarded the item with a
recommendation of approval on a 5-0 vote (Currie and Felner
absent).
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion, approval on first reading of the following revisions
and additions to Section 4.3.4(K), Development Standards
Matrix:
SETBACKS
FRONT SIDE STREET SIDE INTERIOR REAR
Low-Medium
Density
RL (5)
Multi-family 25 25 15 25
Duplex 25 25 15 15
Medium/Medium-high
Density
(5)
Multi-family 25 25 15 25
Duplex 2--5 25 15 15
(5) The provisions for the R-1-A District shall apply for
single family dwellings.
Attachments:
* Ordinance by others
* P&Z Staff Report & Documentation of January 11, 1993
DD\CCRLRM.DOC
PLANNING AND ZONIN~ BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT
MEETING OF: January 11, 1993
AGENDA ITEM: LDR TEXT AMENDMENT REz REDUCTION OF REAR SETBACK
REQUIREMENTS FOR DUPLEX STRUCTURES IN THE RL AND RM
ZONIN~ DISTRICTS
ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD~
The action requested of the Board is making a recommendation to
the City Commission regarding a proposed text amendment to the
LDRs. The amendment would reduce the minimum rear setback
requirement for duplex structures from 25 feet to 15 feet.
BACKGROUND:
On September 16, 1992 the Planning and Zoning Department received a
request from the Woodlake (formerly called Homewood Lakes)
Homeowners Association to amend Section 4.3.4(K) of the LDRs to
reduce the required rear setback for duplexes in the RL district
from 25 feet to 15 feet, in order to allow for the addition of
screen enclosures. The subdivision consists of 272 duplex
residential units and 23 conventionally sited single family
residences.
The existing setbacks for the RL district require 25 foot rear
setback for all structures, with two exceptions, which permit a 10'
rear setback:
* single family detached-structures; and '
* screen enclosures in rear yards which directly abut a minimum
of 50 feet of dedicated open space.
Of the 272 duplex units in Woodlake, 169 have at least 50 feet of
open space directly abutting their rear property line. A number of
those properties have screened enclosures. Of the remaining 103
units, 44 have existing screen enclosures. Fifty-nine duplex
structures have no screen enclosures and do not meet the 50 foot
open space exception. Under the current setback requirements, these
units cannot add onto the rear of their structures.
P&Z Memorandum Staff Report
LDR Text Amendment RE: Rear Setback Requirements
For Duplexes in the RL and RM Zoning Districts
Page 2
In reviewing the portion of the Development Standards Matrix
referring to the RL district, it is noted that setbacks are not
specifically identified for duplex structures. The RL zoning
regulations, however, specify that the same standards which apply to
multi-family structures shall apply to duplexes. The rear setback
requirement for multi-family structures is currently 25 feet, while
the setback for single family structures is as established in the
R-iA district (10 feet). These requirem~nts are the same for
duplexes in the RM zoning district, and are consistent with the
standards which existed before the approval of the LDRs in October
1990.
TEXT CHANGES~
The proposed text amendment is to add setback requirements to the
Development Standards Matrix in LDR Section 4.3.4(K) for duplex
structures in both the RL and RM zoning districts. The revised
requirements would be as follows=
SETBACKS
FRONT SIDE STREET SIDE INTERIOR REAR
Low-Medium
Density
Multi-family 25 ......... 25 .... ~. 15 -- ~-~
Duplex 25 ...... 25 _ 15 ...... -_- ...... ~-~=,~.
Medium-
Medium-High
Density
RM
Multi-family 25 25 15 25
Duplex 2--5 25 15 .~5
* Underline indicates additions; strike-out(///) indicates deletions
Ail other development standards which currently apply to duplexes
(i.e. minimum lot dimensions, maximum height, etc.) would remain the
same.
P&Z Memorandum Staff Report-- - ' ·
LDR Text Amendment RE: Rear Setback Requirements
For Duplexes in the RL and RM Zoning Districts
Page 3
The proposed changes would allow for a reduction in rear setback
requirements for duplex structures, without reducing those for
multiple family structures. The changes would have a secondary
effect of simplifying references to setback requirements. By adding
duplex requirements directly to the matrix in Section 4.3.4(K), the
need to cross-reference between the matrix and individual district
regulations for duplex structures is eliminated.
ANALYSIS OF AMENDMENT'S POTENTIAL IMPACTS~
The potential impacts of the proposed amendment will depend on the
type and intensity of the development of individual RL or RM zoned
areas. This section of the report describes the RL and RM areas in
the city and the development on those parcels. There are four basic
types of RL/RM parcels:
1. Vacant parcels;
2. Duplex developments; and
3.Built-out areas with multi-family (3 or more units)
structures only;
4. Areas with a mix of multi-family, single family, duplex
development and vacant lots.
1. Vacant land with RL or RM zon~ng~
There are several areas in the City with vacant land which is zoned
either RL or RM, and could potentially be developed with duplex
structures. If the setbacks are 'amended,~_ new str~_ctures..~¢guld~be
built within a 15' setback of the-rear property line. This setback
reduction would allow duplex structures to be somewhat closer
together than under current requirements, however a minimum of 30'
would still be provided between rear walls of the structures.
Overall density of any development would be limited by the current
lot size and density requirements. A brief description of vacant RL
and RM areas in the City follows:
Groves of Delray (RM)
The Groves is a 12 acre parcel, east of Wallace Dr., between
Linton Boulevard and SW 10th St. The parcel is approved for
152 multi-family units. No duplexes are included in the
current proposal.
Rldgemont Heights (RM)
This is a 5 acre parcel, located at the southwest corner of SW
10th St. and SW 6th Ave. There is no current approved plan for
the site. Approximately 30 duplexes (60 units) could be buil~
on this parcel.
P&Z Memorandum Staff Report
LDR Text Amendment RE: Rear Setback Requirements
For Duplexes in the RL and RM Zoning Districts
Page 4
The Anchorage (RL)
This parcel consists of approximately 17.6 Acres. There is
currently no approval for the site. However, the site was
recently proposed for development as a single-family community.
The maximum density allowed under the zoning designation is 105
units.
Royal Palm Blvd. (RM)
This site contains approximately 12 acres. There are no current
approved plans for the site. One single family residence and a
landscape nursery exist in the area. Approximately 5 acres
were included as part of the Anchorage proposal. Approximately
140 units is the maximum development potential.
Silver Terrace (RM)
Approximately 20 acres of the Silver Terrace Redevelopment Area
and adjacent properties are zoned RM. Five acres of the area
are approved for the construction of 60 multi-family units, of
which 42 are completed. No approved site plans are in effect
for the remaining 15 acres at this time. This area has a large
number of undeveloped lots and several vacant structures.
A redevelopment plan for the area is currently being developed
by the Planning Department, in conjunction with community
groups.
Rubin Property (RL)
This is a parcel approximately t Acre~n s~ze withan abandoned
single family residence on the site. A total of 5 units could
be built on the site.
Duplex Developmentsl
These are developments which are currently at or near build-out
which predominantly consist of duplexes. The reduction in rear
setbacks would allow for some intensification of the sites without
increasing the density, and could decrease the open space provided
in these built-out areas. However, many of these areas already have
non-conforming structures with setbacks equal to or less than the
15' proposed. A list of duplex developments in the City follows=
Woodlake (Homewood Lakes)
Rainberry Woods (Pine Trail)
Rainberry Woods South (Pine Trail South)
Imperial Villas
Country Manor
Shadywoods
P&Z Memorandum Staff Report
LDR Text Amendment RE: Rear Setback Requirements
For Duplexes in the RL and RM Zoning Districts
Page 5
Built-out RL or RM areas with multi-family structures only~
These areas would not be affected by the proposal due to the fact
that they are at build out according to an approved site plan, and
have no duplexes. A complete list of these developments and areas
is included as Exhibit "A."
RL and RM zoned areas with mixes of housing types
These areas are approaching build-out with a mix of uses, including
a combination of single family, multi-family, duplex units, vacant
lots and some non-conforming commercial uses. Lot sizes in these
areas are generally below the minimum for RL or RM zoning (typically
50' X 135' or 6750 square feet), limiting the potential for new
duplex development. Lot depths are generally 100' to 135'.
The following areas have this type of development:
North of George Bush Blvd. between Federal Hwy. and ICWW (RM):
Marina District (RM)
Del-Ida Park (RL)
Dell Park (RL)
Venetian Dr. Area (RM)
La Hacienda (RL)
Kenmont (RL)
NE 7th Ave. (RM)
Gulfstream Blvd. area (RM)
Florida Blvd. area (RM)
A-1-A and Brooks Lane (RM)
The following areas are similar to the above in lot size and mix of
housing types. However, special circumstances exist in these areas,
which are described below.
SW 1st St. area (RM):
This area has a large number of vacant lots. Portions of this
area are contained in Redevelopment Area #1. The possibility
exists for the consolidation of lots into larger parcels for
unified development.
Pineridge Rd. (RL):
This is a small (less than 1 acre) area with a mixture of
neighborhood commercial uses and a single family residence.
SE 4th Ave. and SE 2nd St. (RM):
Many vacant lots are available here. This area is within the
boundaries of Redevelopment Area #5. The possibility exists
for the consolidation of lots into larger parcels for unified
development.
P&Z Memorandum Staff Report
LDR Text Amendment RE: Rear Setback Requirements
For Duplexes in the RL and RM Zoning Districts
Page 6
Albatross Dr. (RM); NE 3rd Ave., north of 14th St. (RM); SW 20th Ct.
(RM); Del Harbor (RL); S. Swinton Ave. (RM)
Development in these areas is a mix of multi-family and duplex
units. Most of the rear setbacks here are adjacent to "open
space," as defined in LDR Section 4.3.4(H)(5)(c). These
duplexes would be allowed screen enclosures to within 10' of
property lines under current rear setback requirements.
ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSIONS~
RM and RL zoning districts currently require a 25 foot rear setback
for multi-family structures and duplexes, but allow a 10 foot rear
setback for single family structures. While a duplex is somewhat
more intense than a single family home, it is considerably less
intense than multi-family development. It is reasonable to allow
less of a rear setback than would be required for a multi-family
structure. The reduced rear setback requirement would allow for
greater flexibility in the design of a duplex structure, and would
provide the opportunity for owners of existing duplexes to increase
their living area.
The greatest impact of this change would be to areas which are
primarily developed with duplexes, as they would, have the most
potential for intensification with the reduced setbacks. However,
as indicated in this analysis, many of those areas already have
structures with non-conforming reduced setbacks. Additionally,
since a minimum of 30' would remain between buildings, adequate open
space would be maintained.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS~ ..... : -~ ..... ~ .... ~ <"~'~'--- ..... ~-'~
1. Continue with direction.
2. Recommend a text amendment to LDR Section 4.3.4(K),
Development Standards Matrix, adding a specific setback
requirement for duplexes in the RL and RM districts, and
reducing the required rear setbacks for same from 25' to
15'.
3. Recommend denial of a text amendment.
RECOMMENDED ACTION~
Recommend a text amendment to LDR Section 4.3.4(K), Development
Standards Matrix, adding a specific setback requirement for duplexes
in the RL and RM districts, and reducing the required rear setbacks
for same from 25' to 15'.
Attachments:
* Letter of request~om the Woodlake Homeowners Association
P'
Prepared by: erkip~ ning Technician I
Reviewed by DJK on:
Exhibit "A"
Multi-Family developments and RM zoned areas at or near build-out
which have only Multi-family unitsl
Spanish Wells Lakeside
Pines of Delray Pines of Delra¥ West
Pines of Delra¥ North Delra¥ Estates
Delra¥ Oaks Delray Oaks West
Sabal Pines Sabal Pines East
Sabal Pines South Environment
Spring Lake Palm Villas
Fairways on the Green Golfview
Abbey Delray Lake Ray
Layer's Delray Racquet Club Wenton Village
Palms of Delray Lake Delra¥
The Pointe Harbor's Edge
Domaine Delra¥ Linton Woods
Banyan Tree Village Delray Harbor Club
Park Place Harborside
Churchill Barton
Fall Ridge Linton Ridge
Southridge Condos Linton Gardens
La Monica Auburn Trace
Carver Estates Lago Delray
Lago Delray North High Point
Chateau Wood Greensward Village (Hamlet)
The Landings Inlet Cove
700 Block of NE 1st St. Lake Ida Rd. and Davis Rd.
Lowry St. and Andrews Ave. Area Tropic Bay
A-1-A South of Atlantic Dunes Park Pelican Harbor
RM or RL zoned Parcels with single Family
Crosswinds (RL)
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
385 S.W. 2TI'H TERRACE
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33445 ',
August 31, 199~ '.
Mr. David Kovacs, Director Sip lG 1992
Department of Planning and Zoning
100 N.W. 1st Avenue Pb%HNING ~. ZONING
Delray Beach, Florida 33444
Re: Letter from Jeffrey Costello (May 14, 1992)
Dear Mr. Kovacs:
Further to the above referenced letter to Mr. Ted Charney as well
as my follow up letter to you of June 12, 1992, I had the pleasure
of meeting with Richard Hasko and Diane Dominguez on August 21,
1992 to discuss the issue of rear building setback requirements of
Code Section 4.3.4 (K) and procedures for requesting that the code
be amended.
It was further clarified to me in our meeting that the Homewood
Lakes Subdivision (Woodlake) is within a RL Zoning district which
requires a 25' rear building setback for screened porches attached
to duplex dwellings (Code Section 4.3.4 (K)) while only a 10'
setback requirement is required fo~ Sc~eene~ porches attached to
single family dwellings (Code 4.4~5~(F).(t)_~.pro~isions of,-the-R-l-A
district). The Homewood Lakes subdivision has both duplex and
single family dwellings. _
It is our contention that duplex developments are not-that intense
especially in Homewood Lakes. We therefore are hereby requesting a
text amendment of Code Section 4.3.4 {K) reducing the rear buildln9
setback for screened porches from Z5'to 15', or to the 10' setback
requirements currently imposed upon the single family dwellings
within the same development..
The majority of the duplexes within the Homewood Lakes subdivision
currently have screened porches, many of which were part of
original home construction. Other Homeowners have attempted to
make such additions, however, disappointingly became aware of the
building setback requirements of Code Section 4.3.4 (K) which now
prevents them from doing so.
These screened porches are aesthetically pleasing and blend nicely
with the structures of all the duplex dwellings within the Woodlake
Community. Needless to say they enhance the value of the home.
Some owners and local Realtors have lost a sale when potential
buyers learn that screened porches cannot be added.
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
385 S.W. 271'H TERRACE
DELRAY BEACH. FLORIDA 33445
Per the procedures outlined in your letter, in addition to this
formal request for an amendment, ! am also enclosing a mailing list
of all the property owners within the Homewood Lakes subdivision as
well as mailing labels. A 'Palm Beach County property appraiser's
radius map will be provided under separate cover.
On behalf of the Woodlake Homeowners Association (Homewood Lakes
subdivision) I .trust that you will channel this request through the
approprlat. Planning and Zoning Bcards as well as City Commission
levels. Should there be any additional information needed please
contact me as soon as possible. Written communication should be
directed to the office of the Woodlake Homeowners Association.
My phone number is: 1-800-327-0400 ext. 4712, or
305-527-4712
In conclusion, I thank you in advance for your cooperation and look
forward to hearing from you in the near future.
Sincerely,
William H. Decker
Woodlake Homeowners Association
cc: All Woodlake Board of Directors
Ted Charney - Chairman, Woodlake City Liaison Committee
Richard Hasko, P.E. Assistant City Engineer
Jeffrey A. Costello - Planning Technician II
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM #~L - MEETING OF JANUARY 26, 1993
ORDINANCE NO. 16-93
DATE: JANUARY 22, 1993
This is first reading of an ordinance which amends Section
4.3.4(K), Development Standards Matrix, of the Land Development
Regulations, to reduce the required rear setback for duplexes in
the RL and RM zoning districts from 25 feet to 15 feet. The
background and rationale for this proposal is outlined in the
accompanying staff report.
The Planning and Zoning Board formally reviewed this item on
January 11, 1993, and forwarded a recommendation of approval (5-0
vote; Currie and Felner absent).
Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 16-93 on first reading.
BOCA ~~ REGU~TIONS OF THE CODE OF
t~ ~l~ing ~ ~aina~n at OELRAY BEACH, ~LORIOA, TO
Published Daily ~,.,~, ~ T~y, F~ry 9, HISTORIC DISTRICTS; P~OVIDING
Monday through Sunday ~rs. I~ NW. 1st Av~, ~lray REPEALER C~USE, AND AN FF.
Boo~ ~tO~, P~]m Be~oh County, Florida s~ .i, ~s~. ~i~ ~. T.
De~y Be~oh~ P~m Be~oh ~o~ty, ~[o~id~ ~al ~ ~ice~aina~ t~ maYci~ CI~R ~ i~at ~
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY O~ PALM B~AC~ ~.~ ~ND DEVELOPMENT REGU~-
T~ONS OF THE CODE OF OROt.
Before the undersigned authority ~ersonally ~,ss,o. OF THE CITY OF DELRAY $EACH. FLORIDA; PROVIDING A
appeared Nancy Smith, Inside Sales Man- ~o.~.."°" ..,. ~,o.s.,.~ou~,o..o~ ..e ~.oo~ ~,v~o~.~."~" c~u,~. ~.o ~. ~c.
THE CODE OF ORO~NANCES OF
ager of The News. daily newspapers pub- T.~ ClT. OF O~L.AY ,FAC. "'
lished in Boca Baton in Palm Beach County, ..,.,,c,,,,..a~..~. s,o~s .~ .~ o.o,...c~ 0. ,~E Cl.
Florida; that the attached copy of advertise- S~.S~aS~CT,O~ "."C"",.~*c., ~o.,o*,
ment was published in said newspapers in ..O~,OE ~o. T.~ ..0.,.,.,0. .,o.r, ~0.,.~
the issues of: sua-suas~cT,o~-.,,~,.~,, ~ O~O~T ~EO~*-
FLYING F~GS OF SERVICE ORCA. SU~SU~SECTION 4.6.9(E)(3),
NI~TtONS AT T~mES OF ~EET- LIEU FE~, TO PROVIDE THE
/~ L/~ /7~ ., lNG, AND TO PROVIDE FOR THE IN-LIEU FEE OPTION TO THE OLD
LE~ THAN ONE ACRE AND ONE~VING C~USE. A GENE~L
F~ PER )5,~ ~UARE FEET ONPEALER C~USE, AND AN EF~EC-
C~USE, A ~VING C~USE, AND ~ISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY
Affiant further says that The News is a ~.~E~,~T~. ,E~C., ~o.,o..
Palm Beach County, Florida, Monday ~.o.o,.~o~..~c,~c~ T,O.~C,.~..E ~.o
~EACH, FLORI~ ~N~ SEC. C~E OF OROINANCES OF raN
through~"-~-"ou.u~y. and has been entered as .,o...lSO~.~E coo~ a o.o,. c,.. o~ ~....~.c~, ~o.,-
second class matter at the post office in ...CE, .o ~.o~,~ .a T.. ~ .. .0~,.~
RE~Cr~ ~ r~E NU~SE~ OF STAN~, HEA~UARTERS ANO
ALTERNATE M~BERS OF THE NECE~Y SUP~R~
Boca Baton, Palm Beach County. Florida. coo~ ~.~c~E.* ~,.o, .s..~,..,~
PROViOI~ A GENERAL RE~L- U~; ~IDI~ A
for a period of one year next preceding the E. c~usE. ~ s~,.o c~. c~. ~ ~..~
first publication of the attached copy of ~,~
advertisement; and affiant further says that .. o.o,...c~ ~ ,.~ CITY~~
he has neither paid nor promised any .E~C.,~'~'~ 0~o.,o~ C,T. co..E~,~O~
rebate, commission or refund for the pur- ~,~ ~ {,~,,;o
pose of securing this advertisement for pub- ..,c.,'~u'~"v~,o ~.oc~"c'~u.~,~ ~..
AL HIG~AY, ~TH ~ LINTON ~ TO RE.CE THE
~ONI~ ~ ~ DELRAY B~CH, IN ~ RL ~ ~ ~ING
FLOel~ 1~; ~OVlOING A TRI~S FR~ B FEET
GENE~L REPEALER C~USE. A FEET; PR~IOlNG A ~VING
~VING C~USE, AND AN EFFEC. ~U~. A GENER~ REP~L~
~ ~ tt~ ~TE.
MINION OF THE CITY ~ DE~Y ~ W ~ ~ ~
PENDIX "A', ~EFINITI~, OF ~ w ~, ~ ~(~
Sworn to and subscribed before me this ..~ ~.o ~ve~o~....o~ ~, ~. ~.. ~
~TI~S ~ THE COON ~ ORDI- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
THE DEFINITION ~ ~IL~; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
ay of A D.. 19 . PR~IOI~ A ~Vi~ C~USE, A ~.~C~~
I A~~
(Seal,. Notary ~ State of Florida at large) T,O.~. S~CT~O. ~,.,. ~
~IS~R~ PRE~RVAT~ ~D
.
My Commi ~ ~fii. ~P.