27-93 ORDINANCE NO. 27-93
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 2.4.3(I),
"ARCHITECTURAL (APPEARANCE) ELEVATIONS", SUBPARAGRAPH
(1), "RULES", OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF
THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH,
FLORIDA, TO PROVIDE SPECIFIC LANGUAGE REQUIRING BOARD
APPROVAL OF A CHANGE IN EXTERIOR COLOR TO A BUILDING
OR STRUCTURE; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE, A GENERAL
REPEALER CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to LDR Section 1.1.6, the Planning and
Zoning Board reviewed the subject matter at its meeting of March 15,
1993, and has forwarded the change with a recommendation of approval;
and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Florida Statute 163.3174(1) (c), the
Planning and Zoning Board, sitting as the Local Planning Agency, has
determined that the change is consistent with, and furthers the
objectives and policies of, the Comprehensive Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Chapter 2, "Administrative Provisions",
Article 2.4, "General Procedures", Section 2.4.5, "Procedures for
Obtaining Development Approvals", Subsection 2.4.5(I), "Architectural
(Appearance) Elevations", Subparagraph (1), "Rules", of the Land
Development Regulations of the Code of Ordinances of the City of
Delray Beach, Florida, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as
follows:
(I) Architectural (Appearance) Elevations:
(1) Rules:
(a) The Site Plan Review and Appearance
Board or the Historic Preservation
Board, as appropriate, may approve,
approve subject to conditions, or deny
architectural elevations or plans for a
change in the exterior color of a
building or structure~ or for any
exterior feature which requires a
building permit. Exceptions to this
rule include single family residences
which are not a part of a planned
residential community; or for any
development within the single family
zoning districts; or for items
maintained on a list of exempted items
promulgated by the Director.
(b) The Chief Building Official, or his
designee, is hereby delegated the
authority to approve, approve subject
to conditions, or deny any building
permit for the following items which
would otherwise be subject to (1} (a),
above, other than when such items are
associated with initial approval of a
development proposal subject to site
and development plan action:
Features and exterior color
changes which are not significantly
visible from the public street system,
facade changes which do not
significantly alter the style or image
of a structure, fences, walls, sheds,
gazebos, flagpoles, screen enclosures,
changes of roof material, changes of
roof color, public enclosures, site
lighting, awnings, canopies,
construction trailers, decks, handrails
(balcony railings), permanent hurricane
shutters, changes in exterior wall
openings to ' accommodate or alter
overhead garage doors, doors, windows,
dumpster enclosures, and attendant lot
landscaping.
Section 2. That should any section or provision of this
ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence or word be
declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a
whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid.
Section 3. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances
which are in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
Section 4. That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon passage on second and final reading.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final
reading on this the 13~h day of Apri~ , 1993.
ATTEST:
~city -Cl~rk ;
First Reading March 23~ 1993
Second Reading April 13, 1993
- 2 - Ord. No. 27-93
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: CITY MANAGER~
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # /0 /~ - MEETING OF APRIL 13. 1995
ORDINANCE NO. 27-95
DATE: April 9, 1993
This is the second reading of an ordinance amending the Land
Development Regulations by modifying Section 2.4.5 (I)(a) and (b),
"Architectural (Appearance) Elevations", to provide for specific
language requiring Site Plan Review and Appearance Board or Historic
Preservation Board approval of exterior color changes to structures or
elevations.
Prior to the adoption of the LDRs, the City Code contained
requirements regarding aesthetic review. The former Community
Appearance Board was tasked with reviewing every application for a
permit to erect a building, structure or sign, or to materially alter
an elevation. The phrase "materially alter" was interpreted to
include any changes to a building's color.
When the LDRs were adopted, the Community Appearance Board was
reorganized as the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board. The
applicable code sections were changed to read that SPRAB or HPB may
approve, approve subject to conditions, or deny architectural
elevations or plans for an exterior feature which requires a building
permit. The painting of a building does not require a permit;
however, Board approval of color changes has continued to be a
requirement.
The amendment specifies that SPRAB or the HPB, as appropriate, has the
authority to approve or deny changes in the exterior color of a
building or structure. The amendment also provides the authority for
the Chief Building Official to approve color changes that are not
significantly visible from a public street.
The Planning and Zoning Board at their March 15th meeting recommended
approval. A detailed staff report is attached as backup material for
this item.
At the March 23rd regular meeting, Ordinance No. 27-93 passed on first
reading by a 5-0 vote.
Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 27-93 on second and final reading.
CITY COMMI S S I ON DOCUMENTAT I ON
TO: /~DAV.~D T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER
FROM: DIANE DOMINGUEZ, PLANNER III ~ ~
SUBJECT: MEETING OF MARCH 23, 1993
FIRST READING~ ORDINANCE AMENDING LDR SECTION
2.4.5 ( I ), ARCHITECTURAL (APPEARANCE) ELEVATIONS
ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION:
The action requested of the City Commission is that of
apDroval on first reading, of an ordinance modifying the
City's Land Development Regulations (LDRs).
The affected Section is:
* 2.4.5(I)(a)&(b): Architectural (Appearance)
Elevations: Rules
BACKGROUND:
This proposed amendment would provide specific language in the
LDRs requiring Board approval of color changes to structures or
elevations. Exterior color changes have required Board approval
since the former Community Appearance Board was established in
1980, however, the language in the code has been somewhat vague
as to this requirement. This amendment would specify that the
Site Plan Review and Appearance Board (SPRAB), or the Historic
Preservation Board (HPB) as appropriate, has authority to
approve or deny changes in the exterior color of a building or
structure. Color changes that are not significantly visible
from a public street could be approved by the Chief Building
Official or his designee.
Please refer to the Planning and Zoning Board Staff Report for
more detail.
City Commission Documentation
LDR Amendment Re: Preliminary Engineering Plans
Page 2
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION:
The Planning and Zoning Board formally reviewed this item its
meeting of March 15, 1993. The Board forwarded the item with a
recommendation of approval on a 6-0 vote (Felner absent).
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
By motion, approval on first reading.
Attachments:
* Ordinance by others
* P&Z Staff Report & Documentation of March 15, 1993
DD/ .DOC
ORDINANCE NO. 27-93
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 2.4.3(I),
"ARCHITECTURAL (APPEARANCE) ELEVATIONS", SUBPARAGRAPH
(1), "RULES", OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF
THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH,
FLORIDA, TO PROVIDE SPECIFIC LANGUAGE REQUIRING BOARD
APPROVAL OF A CHANGE IN EXTERIOR COLOR TO A BUILDING
OR STRUCTURE; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE, A GENERAL
REPEALER CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to LDR Section 1.1.6, the Planning and
Zoning Board reviewed the subject matter at its meeting of March 15,
1993, and has forwarded the change with a recommendation of approval;
and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Florida Statute 163.3174(1) (c), the
Planning and Zoning Board, sitting as the Local Planning Agency, has
determined that the change is consistent with, and furthers the
objectives and policies of, the Comprehensive Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Chapter 2, "Administrative Provisions",
Article 2.4, "General Procedures", Section 2.4.5, "Procedures for
Obtaining Development Approvals", Subsection 2.4.5(I), "Architectural
(Appearance) Elevations", Subparagraph (1), "Rules", of the Land
Development Regulations of the Code of Ordinances of the City of
Delray Beach, Florida, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as
follows:
(I) Architectural (Appearance) Elevations:
(1) Rules:
(a) The Site Plan Review and Appearance
Board or the Historic Preservation
Board, as appropriate, may approve,
approve subject to conditions, or deny
architectural elevations or plans for a
change in the exterior color of a
building or structure, or for any
exterior feature which requires a
building permit. Exceptions to this
rule include single family residences
which are not a part of a planned
residential community; or for any
development within the single family
zoning districts; or for items
maintained on a list of exempted items
promulgated by the Director.
(b) The Chief Building Official, or his
designee, is hereby delegated the
authority to approve, approve subject
to conditions, or deny any building
permit for the following items which
would otherwise be subject to (1) (a),
above, other than when such items are
associated with initial approval of a
development proposal subject to site
and development plan action:
Features and exterior color
changes which are not significantly
visible from the public street system,
facade changes which do not
significantly alter the style or image
of a structure, fences, walls, sheds,
gazebos, flagpoles, screen enclosures,
changes of roof material, changes of
roof color, public enclosures, site
lighting, awnings, canopies,
construction trailers, decks, handrails
(balcony railings), permanent hurricane
shutters, changes in exterior wall
openings to accommodate or alter
overhead garage doors, doors, windows,
dumpster enclosures, and attendant lot
landscaping.
Section 2. That should any section or provision of this
ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence or word be
declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a
whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid.
Section 3. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances
which are in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
Section 4. That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon passage on second and final reading.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final
reading on this the day of , 1993.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
First Reading
Second Reading
- 2 - Ord. No. 27-93
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT
MEETING OF~ MARCH 15, 1993
AGENDA ITEM= III.D. LDR TEXT AMENDMENT ADDING SPECIFIC
LANGUAGE REQUIRING SPRAB OR HPB REVIEW OF
EXTERIOR COLOR CHANGES
ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD:
The item before the Board is that of making a
recommendation to the City Commission regarding a proposed
change to the LDRs. The amendment would include specific
language under Section 2.4.5 (I), Architectural
(Appearance) Elevations, requiring SPRAB review for a
change in exterior color to a building or structure.
BACKGROUND:
Prior to the adoption of the LDRs in 1990, the City's code
requirements regarding aesthetic reviews stated the following:
"the Community Appearance Board is required to review every
application for a permit to erect a building, structure or sign,
or to materially alter an elevation" [REF: Section 152.39
(B)(1)]. The phrase "materially alter" was interpreted to
include any changes to a building's color. Exterior color
changes have been required to have Board approval since the CAB
was established (1980).
When the LDRs were revised in 1990, and the Community Appearance
Board was reorganized as SPRAB, the applicable section was
changed to read that SPRAB (or HPB, as appropriate) "may
approve, approve subject to conditions or deny architectural
elevations or plans for an exterior feature which requires a
building permit" [REF: Section 2.4.5(I)(1)(a)]. The painting of
a building does not require a building permit. Board approval
of color changes has continued to be a requirement, even though
the authority for the review is not spelled out.
The proposed amendment would provide specific language requiring
SPRAB or HPB approval of color changes to structures or
features. The amendment would allow for that authority to be
delegated to the Chief Building Official or his designee when
the proposed color change is not significantly visible from the
public street system.
PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTs
(I) Architectural (ADDearance) Elevations..
( 1 ) Rules:
(a) The Site Plan Review and Appearance Board or the
Historic Preservation Board, as appropriate, may
tII.D.
P&Z Memo Staff Report
LDR Amendment RE: Board Review of Color Changes
Page 2
approve, approve subject to conditions or deny
architectural elevations or plans for a change in
the exterior color of a building or structured or
for an exterior feature which requires a building
permit. Exceptions to this rule include single
family residences which are not a part of a
planned residential community; or for any
development within the single family zoning
districts; or for items maintained on a list of
exempted items promulgated by the Director.
(b) The Chief Building Official, or his designee, is
hereby delegated the authority to approve,
approve subject to conditions, or deny any
building permit for the following items which
would otherwise be subject to (1)(a), above,
other than when such items are associated with
initial approval of a development proposal
subject to site and development plan action:
Features and exterior color changes which
are not significantly visible from the
public street system, facade changes which
do not significantly alter the style or
image of a structure, fences, walls, sheds,
gazebos, flagpoles, screen enclosures,
changes of roof material, changes of roof
color, public enclosures, site lighting,
awnings, canopies, construction trailers,
decks, handrails (balcony railings),
permanent hurricane shutters, changes in
exterior wall openings to accommodate or
alter overhead garage doors, doors, windows,
dumpster enclosures, and attendant lot
landscaping.
Recommended Action:
By motion, recommend to the City Commission approval of the text
amendment to Section 2.4.5(I)(1)(a) and (b) to add specific
language requiring Board approval of a change in exterior color
to a building or structure.
Jcm/T:TXTCOLOR
Report prepared by: Janet Meeks, Planner II
Reviewed by DJK on: ~--~-~
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM ~ l~~ - MEETING OF MARCH 23. 1993
ORDINANCE NO. 27-93
DATE: March 19, 1993
This is the first reading of an ordinance amending the Land
Development Regulations by modifying Section 2.4.5 (I)(a) and (b),
"Architectural (Appearance) Elevations", to provide for specific
language requiring Site Plan Review and Appearance Board or Historic
Preservation Board approval of exterior color changes to structures or
elevations.
Prior to the adoption of the LDRs, the City Code contained
requirements regarding aesthetic review. The former Community
Appearance Board was tasked with reviewing every application for a
permit to erect a building, structure or sign, or to materially alter
an elevation. The phrase "materially alter" was interpreted to
include any changes to a building's color.
When the LDRs were adopted, the Community Appearance Board was
reorganized as the Site Plan Review and Appearance Board. The
applicable code sections were changed to read that SPRAB or HPB may
approve, approve subject to conditions, or deny architectural
elevations or plans for an exterior feature which requires a building
permit. The painting of a building does not require a permit;
however, Board approval of color changes has continued to be a
requirement.
The amendment specifies that SPRAB or the HPB, as appropriate, has the
authority to approve or deny changes in the exterior color of a
building or structure. The amendment also provides the authority for
the Chief Building Official to approve color changes that are not
significantly visible from a public street.
The Planning and Zoning Board at their March 15th meeting recommended
approval. A detailed staff report is attached as backup material for
this item.
Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 27-93 on first reading.
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT
MEETING OFt MARCH 15, 1993
AGENDA ITEM~ III.D. LDR TEXT AMENDMENT ADDING SPECIFIC
LANGUAGE REQUIRING SPRAB OR HPB REVIEW OF
EXTERIOR COLOR CHANGES
ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD=
The item before the Board is that of making a
recommendation to the City Commission regarding a proposed
change to the LDRs. The amendment would include specific
language under Section 2.4.5 (I), Architectural
(Appearance) Elevations, requiring SPRAB review for a
change in exterior color to a building or structure.
BACKGROUND:
Prior to the adoption of the LDRs in 1990, the City's code
requirements regarding aesthetic reviews stated the following:
"the Community Appearance Board is required to review every
application for a permit to erect a building, structure or sign,
or to materially alter an elevation" [REF: Section 152.39
(B)(1)]. The phrase "materially alter" was interpreted to
include any changes to a building's color. Exterior color
changes have been required to have Board approval since the CAB
was established (1980).
When the LDRs were revised in 1990, and the Community Appearance
Board was reorganized as SPRAB, the applicable section was
changed to read that SPRAB (or HPB, as appropriate) "may
approve, approve subject to conditions or deny architectural
elevations or plans for an exterior feature which requires
building permit" [REF: Section 2.4.5(I)(1)(a)]. The painting of
a building does not require a building permit. Board approval
of color changes has continued to be a requirement, even though
the authority for the review is not spelled out.
The proposed amendment would provide specific language requiring
SPRAB or HPB approval of color changes to structures or
features. The amendment would allow for that authority to be
delegated to the Chief Building Official or his designee when
the proposed color change is not significantly visible from the
public street system.
PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT:
(I) Architectural (Appearance) Elevations:
(1) Rules:
(a) The Site Plan Review and Appearance Board or the
Historic Preservation Board, as appropriate, may
III.D.
P&Z Memo Staff Report
LDR Amendment RE: Board Review of Color Changes
Page 2
approve, approve subject to conditions or deny
architectural elevations or plans for a change in
the exterior color of a building or structured or
for an/exterior feature which requires a building
permith Exceptions to this rule include single
family residences which are not a part of a
planned residential community; or for any
development within the single family zoning
districts; or for items maintained on a list of
exempted items promulgated by the Director.
(b) The Chief Building Official, or his designee, is
hereby delegated the authority to approve,
approve subject to conditions, or deny any
building permit for the following items which
would otherwise be subject to (1)(a), above,
other than when such items are associated with
initial approval of a development proposal
subject to site and development plan action:
Features and exterior color changes which
are not significantly visible from the
public street system, facade changes which
do not significantly alter the Style or
image of a structure, fences, walls, sheds,
gazebos, flagpoles, screen enclosures,
changes of roof material, changes of roof
color, public enclosures, site lighting,
awnings, canopies, construction trailers,
decks, handrails (balcony railings),
permanent hurricane shutters, changes in
exterior wall openings to accommodate or
alter overhead garage doors, doors, windows,
dumpster enclosures, and attendant lot
landscaping.
Recommended Action:
By motion, recommend to the City Commission approval of the text
amendment to Section 2.4.5(I)(1)(a) and (b) to add specific
language requiring Board approval of a change in exterior color
to a building or structure.
Jcm/T:TXTCOLOR
Report prepared by: Janet Meeks, Planner II
Reviewed by DJK on: ~-~-~
MENT REGULATIONS
OF TI~
CO~ Of: ORDINANCES OF
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FL~
DA, TO CLARIFY THE REGOIR~
MEI(TS ASSOCIATED WITH PRE-
LIMINAEY ENGINEERIRG PLANS;
PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE, A
GENERAL REP~LER cLAUSE,
AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
MISSION OF THE CITY OF D~.U~AY
BEACI;, FLORIDA, AMENDING SEC-
TION 2.4.3(t), "ARCHITECTURAL
· (APPEARANCE) ELEVATIONS~,
SUBPARAGRAPH (1), 'RULESt, OF
THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGU-
~ ' LATIONS OF THE CODE OF ORDI-
NANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY
BRACH,FLORIDA, TO PROVIDE
SPECIFIC LANGUAGE REQUIRING
BOARD APPROVAL OF A CHANGE
IN EXTERIOR COLOR TO A BUILD-
tNG OR STRUCTURE: PROVIDING
A SAVING CLAUSE, A GENERAL
REPEALER CLAUSE, AND AN EF-
FECTIVE DATE.
A PUBLIC HEARING will be /IM(I an AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COM-
~ fMIowing pnq~ Ordinance~ at MISSION OF THE CiTY OF DELRAY
7:MI P.M., (~ it any cowiing~ion Of BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING SEG
such montl~ ~ IS set by tbe CGm- T~ON L1.1~, ~qNATER SYSTEM', SUB.
mM), on Tu4sMy, A4X'II 13, Iffl, in SECTION &I.10(D)(]), 'FIRE PRO,
rM CI~y Cor~isl/~fl ~ 1~0 TECTION PROVISIONS!, SURPARA.
N.W. lS1' Av~)tJe, DM)ay ~ It GRAPH (d), OF THE LAND DEVEL-
wi/ddt time 11~ City CM11misMOn will OPMENT REGULATIONS OF TH~
M T~Mr 41dopflal. The pfa~allg CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
ardktilc# mey be ins~K1ed M fire O(~ CITY OF DELRAY BRACH, FLORk,
rice Of ~ CI~y Clark it file CRy Hitl, DA, TO PROVIDE FOR A NEW
(gl N.W. ~s~ AYIIwe, DMrly B#d~, STANDARD REGARDING FIRE
FlarMi, fTam I:M A.M. 1o S:aQ PJ~, FLOW REQUIREMENTS; PROVIO.
4~fldly ~ Frid~, ~ MI- lNG A SAVING CLAUSE, A GENER-
days. AJI W berries ire invited AL REPRALER CLAUSE, AND AN
to M and be heirB with rt~pict M EFFECTIVE DATE.
MIIMICI IIO. SE41
alIliMICi NG. ~148
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COAt.
MISSION OF THE CITY OF D~LRAY AN ONDINANCI~ OF THE CITY COAt,
RRAC)t, FLORIDA, REZONING AISD MISSION OF THE CiTY OF DELRAY
PLACING LAND PRESENTLY BRACH, FLORIDA, MENDING
ZONED KC (PLANNED COM- CHAPTER4, 'ZONING REGULA.
MERCE CENTER) DISTRICT IN TIONS', SECTION 4.4.11,
THE LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DIS- 'AUTQMQTIVE CGMMEROAL (AC)
TRICT; SAID LAND BEING LOCAT- DISTRICT~, SUBSECTIONS (G) AND
ED ON THE WEST SIDE OF CON- (H), OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT
GRESS AVENUE, BETWEEN AT- REGULATIONS OF THE CODE OF
LANT~C AVENUE AND LW ORDINANCES OF THE CiTY OF
eOULEVARD, AS THE SAME fS DEFRAY BRACH, FLORIDA, TO
MORE PARTICULARLYDE- PROVIDE FOR THE TRANSFEE OF
KRIIED HEEE)N; AND AMEND-AUTHONITY FOR WAIVERS TO
lNG 'ZONI#G DISTRICT MAP, DEL- CERTAIN DtSTR~CT REGULATKX~
RAY BEACH, FLORIDA, ?~'; FRO- FROM THE PLANNING AND ZON-
V;D)NG A GENERAL REPRALERlNG BOARD TO THE SITE PLAN RE-
CLAUSE, A SAVING CLAUSE, AND VIEW AND APPRAUNCE BOARD;
AN EFFECTiVEDATE. PROVID;NG A SAVING CLAUSE, A
GENERAl REPEALER CLAUSE,
~ NO. ~ AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COt~ PMme be an'visid /hat if a ~xc,xn ar
MISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY berlans becMis ~o ~ an)' deci~
BF. ACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING SEC- mabe by ~ City ComfltiW
TION 4.4~IL '?.JGHT ~NDUSTRIAL sbect to any W cans)Amid ~t iftIS
(LI} DISTRICT~, SUBSECTiON nliMklg (x, ban)lng, sudt per,Jon(sJ
4.4~&(C), 'ACCESSORY USE AND will rind ~ recm~ Of m~e p~cw~
STRUCTURES PERMITTE~, SUB- ingl, on4 ~ this p4J~ su(:Jl per-
PARAGRAPt4 (4), OF THE LAND selt($) ff~y ~ I~
D~'VELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF bMMI ~ incWdi~ ifil
THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OFand evtdex:l W IMYx:B
THE CITY OF DELRAY ERACH,~ he Breed. The CIly
FLORIDA, TO CLARIFY THE TYP~ ar ~ sudl rK~
OF RETAILING AND THE AMOUNT F.S. 21.01M.
OF FLOO~ ARRA WHICH MAY BE
DEVOTED TO RETAIL USE;
M#DING SECTION
q)EVELOPMENT STANDARD~ MA- CITY OF DELRAY BEACH
TRtX", TO PROVIDE FOR A REDUC- AU~01~ MicG~gar
TION IN THE LOT FRO#TA~E RE- Cltf CISfl(
~UIREMENT FOR THE LIGHT IN-
DUSTRIAL ZONE DISTRICT; PRO-
VlOING A SAVING CLAUSE, A GEN- THE
ERAL REPRALER CLAUSE, AND
AN EFFECTIVE DATE. AM24~i~
AN OROI~KE OF THE CITY CO~
MISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY
EEACH, FLORIDA AMENDING SEC-
TI~N ~L£1(i, N,.ANO~.P~ REGUUI,
SUBSECTION
'IRRIGATIONDESIGN STAN.
DAEDSI, OF THE LAND DEVELOP*.
MNT REGULATIONS OF THE
CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
CiTY OF DELRAY BRACH,
D~ TO PROVIDE REQUIREMEIIT$
~ THE USE OF RUST I#HtR)TON
EQUIPMENT AND RAIN SENSING
DEVICES FO~ IRRIGATION SYS-
TEMS; PROVIDfNG A SAVIND
CLAUSE, A GENGRAL REI~,ALER
CLAUSE,ANDAN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY CGM.
MISSION OF THE CiTY OF DELEAY
BRACN, FLORIDA, MNDING SEC-
TION 2.~L3, ISU~MISSION REQUIRE-
MENTS~,SUBSECT)ON
'PRELIMIHARY ENGI_NEERING