12-28-66 ~,77
DECEMBER 28, 1966.
A regular meeting of the City Counci,1 of Delray Beach was he!d
in the Council 'Chambers at 8100 P.M., with Vice-Mayor J. LeRoy. Crof,t
in the Chair, City Manager David M. Gatchel, City[Attorney John'Ross
Adams, 'and Councilm~n James H. Jurney, Jack L. SaUnders and GeOrge
Talbot, Jr. being present.
1. An o!~ening Prayer was. delivered by Councilman-Elect LeRoy Merritt,
and the Pledge of Allegian'Ue to 'the Flag of. ,the united S[tates of
America was given.
2. The minutes o~ the regular Council meeting of Dec.ember !2th and
special meeting of DeCember 19th, 1966, ~ere, Un.~nimoUslY &Pproved, '
on motion by Mr. Talbot and seconded by Mr.' Jurney; -'
3. Mrs, Dorothea G. Montgomery 'informed COUncil that. she had not
received a written answer" from ~tr.~, Art' Smith, Director of Planning,
Zoning and Inspection~ to a letter she had :written him on December
gth asking what could be built on her property in an R~3 Multiple
Family Dwelling District on Ocean BOulevard. ?h6 Vice=Mayor a~ked' the
City Manager to investigate this item and see that it is taken care
of.
4. City Manager Gatchel.~=~d,,,,~..~, e~Beautification committee meeting
minutes of D%eemb'er 7th,"'~{)~'~"and b'a~d that the committee had
quested council, action on th~ l~?llo,wi,~,. Stems ~ ..,, ,. ....... ~.~ .... ~ ....
· ~, .'(east o!~"raii:~ad'.;~ eou~" oi~ 2nd.~tre'et) ~ corner of West "
· "~tlah~.L~' ~cl [~,' ~': ~i2th &venues= N. E. Cth Street and
would
.: . ,_2. ' ,T~.,"e,.:C,om~, it~ee' als~ l£~e the s~gn or~inance en£orced at
~urray Mot~rs at S. 2, 5th ~venue and let Street where the 'number and
house tfaiiar.
:~, & complaint ~. regist;ered, r~garcling, a,
l~as been parked next to a home on N. 'Eo '2nd ~venue'
and 12th~ ~Street.., This also .app~ar~s, to be a v..iolat£o~.of
' C~ncerni It 1, Mr. Talb~ moved that this.' item be re~erred
.to the City, ~,na~r for pronlpt ~?tention. and ~batement,-~ollowed by
matter; The mot{~n was seconded by Mr. Saundere and carried unan-
imously.
t~o, 'the;C~ty,~ ~age~, ~'r ~r..o,mP~. a'~;ten~L:On'i"and a~atement';' ~oll~wed by a
report to Co~c£1' e~ its next ~zng 'as to the concIveion o~
ment~on,e.d, had al, rea.dy,~be~..n ~mo~, ,ed,.
~OilOWing
repre,aenta(ives, tO be-. i~ at~t~hF!a~ce~, , ' ' '.. '~'.
Beach Taxpayers League, inc. Mr. J. Watson Dunbar
Zonta Club & Business &
Professional Woman's Club Mrs. Dorothea G. Montgomery
'Board of Realtor& Mr. H. Ben Adams
InSUra~lce;~gents AssoCiation Mr. l~arvey Br°wn'
5~ City Cl~k worthing read the 'follOWing l'etter from the' P~[rst
National Bank of Delray Beach, dated December 19'th, 1966:
"We wish to thank the city for permitting the Florida
Power and Light Company to remove their telephone poles
adjoining' ~he ba~k's property On southeast Third Avenue
to the West Side of the avenue.
This has enhanced the appearance of our newly enlarged
parking lot, and we do appreciate 'the cooperation of
the city in per~tting this to be done.
5.a. Mr. Jurney informed countS1 that it bad been. called to his
attention by s~evera! people .that that%' ~s'. no' 'd~signatea taxi' pick-up
of Ati~tic Avenue ,on S,' E. 4th,Avenue,, .
?oiiOwing diScUse~on, .the City Manager sa.id' he would investigate
this item.
6.a. Concerning consideration of Change Order NO. 3, affecting Bumby
a Stimpson's oO~tract on the sewer prpJect in Area 11, the City
Man. agar ~informe~.Council ~ha% said Change. 0ra~.provideS fo.= several
small Conv~nie'n~e'and betterment items ~' Li~t~St&tiOn'il-k, Which'
have been r~ested ~d deamed'adv~'S'~h~e by~e CitY,~ ~ SuPer-
intendent to facilita~e maintenance th~ereof, and concurred in by the
Consulting Engineers.~'''~ Fprther" to,al Cost for ~theSe additional items,
$269.00 . and ac~:ep~:ahce'~'~;~e;f~,' ~b~'aU~:~'brizing .the execution of
Change orde~ No. ~ by the prOper ~arties, is ~e~6~mended.. '(C°~ of
said Change Order So. ~ ~s attached to the official copy o~ ~hese
minutes~) See..pa~ges 2@2-A-C.
~t was So, mOved by Mr. Saunders, seconded by Mr. ~urney and
unani~Ously
6.b. Regarding FINAL ~.STI~ATB to the completed con~ract o~ Bumby &
Stimpson, !nc. for Area l:l of the 0swage w. or~s Pro~'e~%, city ~anager
Gatchel reported .to Council aa fol!ows.~
"chan~e orde~ No. 4' relatiV6 to' Bumb¥ & St~mpson'e con,act
dated December 27,. 1965, provides for reconciliation of all differences
between the as~bu~lt~ ~uant~ties and the bid quantities, and the result
of ,1 .le i nS 'toe' original, a
under.run of '.$i6.'.8~,00,~'causW~',':ma!nly~ through tBe':deletion of certain
lines, ~e, rving County ,a~j~as that did not appear to
annexat~o~'. The~' dei~[~ns, ~ns2all~io"s for which were included
in the original contract, were directed by Council.
The pleasure of Council concerning the final estimate and approval
of ~C~,,ange ~Order No. 4 is reacts.ted." Ac, cePta~c~ of FINAL ESTIMATE and
approval ~f said Change~ Order.'~o; ~. wP~e. ~nanim°Usly provided, f0~r on
Order ~o'. 4 ~s a~ached ~0 ~he of~c~a~ co~ o~ ~h~e m~nu~es.)
See p~ge~ 2~2-D-~.
6.c. Regarding pro, sad assessment roll for s'idewalk COfls~ruction
prov~ent within the street rights-Of-way of variou~S~eets i~' 'the
Wes~er~ sec~r of the City, ~. Sanders moved that said AssesSm~t
Roll be approved. The motion w~s ~secO~6d ~ ~. Jurney and carried
unani~usly. (Copy of said AsSess~en'~ Roll is attached' tO the official
copy of these minutes. See pages 282-M-P, front and back of pages.
6.d Regarding consideration Of an offer ~ the City for addit~0nal
garbage ~d trash diesel area,, th~ ~~age~ i~fo~ ~eil tha~
o~ers of a tract of l~d, comp~i61ng approx,&rely nine acres, have
-2- 1~-28-66
2?9
indicated Willingness to make said area available for purchase by
City and that this tract of land ia contiguous to 'and extends southerly
from tlie present municipal city dump property as shown by a sketch
presented to Council. Further, that it is recommended that Council
refer this offer to the' City Manager for possible negotiation, cost
det~£nation, a~d recon~nendation thereon, to be submitted to Council
for consideration.
Mr. Jurney moved that .this item be referred to the City Manage.r
for further negotiations and it be brought back to Council with his
findings.
Mr. Jurney said that hg realizes the land fill areas are pretty
well filled up and suggested that the City Manager contact the Co~ty
Con~nission in regard tO working out something whereby they would expend
the money for an incinerator to dispose of the garbage and refuse that
comes from the City and that it be placed in an area where it could be
used by the neighboring communities to the north and south, and that
the Cities using same pay their proportionate share on a tonnage basis.
Mr. Jurney said that he would also like the method of composting
garbage lOoked into.
Mr. Talbo~ referred to St. Petersburg and their use of a private
industry to dispose of their garbage, and that maybe such e method
could be used here.
City .M~ager Gatchel reported that St. Petersburg has an incinera-
tion process SAd also a composting process, and that Glace Engineering
Corporation wrote the specifications on each of those, me,hods of solid
w s e d~spos~ll, further, t~e ~C~ty of D~lray .Beach has an inv~tatton
to visit those Pla~,,~s at St. ~et,.e~sb ,uz2~' ' . · -' ..
M~, S9 _und~.~s ~econded .t, he_mot~,0n 'reg&rd~ng neg~tiat~on Wi ~ .the
o.wners of th~, prop. arty offSet:ed: .:t~lte City, and mo.t.io, n~
.. , Mr...J,.n~n.e`y .;~en moved ~at' the .City Manager pursue the possibility
of dis .~osa.1..b~.. p~.i~.a,te, en.,tarpl.i~s!, a.s s~gge~tec! by ,Mr, Talb. o.t., 'aild also
p,u~sua. 'the ..Po~ib!.lit'¥,.':0f.~a~'~icip'Ati, on .:b~. ih6..'c0un~y,, i~s, '.'g6gge~ed',: The
mqtion was seconded 'by'Mrl '~albot an~ ca, tied Unanim0USl~.' '
!st Avenue ,bOrdering. the post _Qffice Eloc~, City Manager G.atche!
POrted that 'the ~ehCl ial.o~S ~h~ West,'s.~de O~ said'block ~as '°='iginailY'
Inltalled by '.fha' oW~r~i6f,'BloCk ~3 a~d''within th®,west. 16 feet .~iere0f,
ind ,this, 16-!6o~ '$(riP'waS'.;~.ater d. edieited '~0 the 'CiltY' ~£ Delray ;Beach
i~r ,ailed'way!. p~r:'po.~e~;' .' ?',~. th,~r',i,/'it has been determined that~mainte-.
nance of the:fence should be. the` resp~nSibility °i the Cit~ which
represents..n~ .Problem as' there Is no need for repairs 'or replacements
of any POrtions Of.th? ~fence ~t this tiu~: and if.and,when ~uch.ma¥
be.n~eded, there` is a ~local avail.able 'sourCe ism ~,ge material~.'however,
if the main, tenance of the ~en~e :'i~iis uPOn the City, the city W6uld
construct, forms and cas. t any par. ts as they are needed at a min'.~n,..um of
cost. The city Ida!Anger said 6hat. i£'.the..ience ..iS d~.a~ecl byl..otl%:er .
than City equl, l~ment, the cos. t o~ ':re~ai~s ~uld:'be b~lidd"~th~e One
damaging 'the ~n'ce. iFU, t~ne~..~el~e'{tve t~"~he u~Paved' p°r~i6'n o~ N.
1st Avenue right-o~/Way..'adjace~ t~"the' ~.e-no~',' t~d should. ~it' ~e (he
pleasure of Coun~i'~',to:'Pro~ide' ,for landscaping. 6f ~ame, ~uthorization
for such ~eauttfica~!0n,,,- .to~a.~he~ wi'th an! .appropr:£atlb~ '6~: ~$~90~'00 froa
Gene. iai .Pund"Co~t'lngency :lcc0~t' to Cover the 'd~termln~,' c~s(':~h'ereof,
.' Mr.' Tal!~.t s~uggested 'that mo~e landscaping ,be ins~talled 'gna the
£ence rom0ved':a.' h'e'~fel.t it"W~la'~ c0stlY~'t6, maint~in:.'~hb:'fan~e. The
Ci .;Y..Manag,er ssi:d,, t~a,t. ,it may ,be po.S.sible to r~move 'oa$!,£en~e'. 'after
the hibiscus 'hedge, gets to ~rol~ing good. ' "
Vice-Mayor Croft asked if .the' fence automatically heco~mes the
P, rOper .t-f~ of the, C!ty~ and.city 'Ag.t~[ne~ A~ams said" if the'.Cit~.' under-
take~ the"matntenance 'of said:-fe~Pe, south'. of .the post ~ff.iC".e',a~'ea,. a
bi, l! of sale or title conveyance .of the fence to the' city ~hould'.be
obtained. . ' -
Concerning 'the lands~ap£"ag~, Cit. Y .Manager Ga.~chei Lremi~ded ~0unc[l
2hat the. S890.00 figure is for, put,basel of .the s6d and materials for
" '['~: i.~3~' ' :' ' ' 12-28~66
,280
the sprinkling system, and .does not include labor.
Mr. Sauflders moved that authorization for such beautification
be given, together with an &ppropriation of ~890..00 from General Fund
ContingencF ~Account-to cover, cost of-same. The motion we~ seconded
by Mr. Jurney and~ car. tied unan~mousiy.
6.f. RegardS. rig bids received for the City's insurunce coverage program
for 1967, City Manager Gatchel read a memorandum from 'FinanCe Director
Weber, dated December 22nd, 1966 giving recommendations for award of
bids, also a tabulation of the insurar~ce bids. (Cop~ of Memorandum and
tabulation of bids is attached to the official copy of these m~nutes.)
Following explanation of the. bids 'by the City Manager, Mr. Saunde:~:
complimented the City Administration. on the present insurance program,
and moved that the awards be made aa outlined and =e~ommended in the
memorandum from Finance Director Weber. The motion was seconded By
Mr. Jurney and carried unanimously.
See pages
7.a. C~ty Clerk Worthing informed Council of a petition having been
received from several owners of properties located on Shulson Street,
requesting said name be cha~ged ~o Bay Street, and that lands 'chined by
the petitioners represent approximately 6~.:4% of the total lands abuttin~.
on Shulaon Street. Further, that following receipt of the petition,
a letter, reflecting the requested street name change, was forwarded
to the remaining property owners on ShulSon street and replies received
favoring ,the change in name increased the percentage favoring the change
Mr. ,James B. Wilson, owner of two pieu'es of 'prOperty on Shulson
Street gave his reasons for desiring a street name change, and also
informed Council that there had been some research in,o"the origin
of the name Shulson and it isn't believed t/~e~e is enough historical
or sentimental significance to that name to keep' it from being changed.
Mr. Talbot moved that ~the City Attorney b~~ instructed to prepare
a Resolution reflec~ng said ~atreet 'name' change to be presented to
Council 9t their next meeting assuming there are~ no 0hJect~ns from the
Post Office. The motion was seconded by Mr. Saunders and carried
unanimously.
7.b. City Clerk Worthing informed COuncil of a request having been
received for a zoning, change.of Lots 1, 2 & 3, Block 81 from R-2 {One
and Two Fa~A.i~y Dwelling District) to C-2 (General commercial District)
and that Council may deny this request or~ re£er same to the Planning/
Zoning..Board for a public hearing thereon to be provided~
Said request for rezoning was unanimously referred to the
Planning/Zoniug Board, on motion by Mr. Sa~Aders and seconded by Mr.
Jurney.
?.c. Cit~ Clerk Wot,thing read the following letter of resignation from
Mr. H. W..~erquest~
"For business and 'personal reasons I find it impossible
for me to continue as a Director of the Resources
Development Board of Palm Beach CoUnty, representing
· he City of De!ray Beach.
Tn view of the above,, please co~sid~r, thi.s letter as
my resigna~ion., to take effect January 1, 1967.
Copy of this letter is being sent to the Resources
Development Board."
Mr. Saunders.~oved that this letter of resignation be accepted,
with regret, and a letter be sent him thanking h~m' for past serVices.
The motion was-seconded by Mr. Talbot and carried unefl/mously.
It was ~ointed out that Mayor Avery and Councilman Jurney
members of eo/d Palm Beach Resources Development Board and may
to reconudend a replacement for Mr. Gerquest.
-4- 12-28-66
281
8.a. City Clerk ~orthing presented RESOLUTION NO. 44-66[
A RES°~U~ION or ~ C~TY.COUSCI~. OF ~ CITY OF D~X
B~, F~R~A, ASSESSinG COSTS FOR.~ATI~
UPON ~RTAIN L~S L~ATED ~IN SAID CITY; S~ING
OUT A~AL ~S I~D BY SAID CITY ~ ACCO~LISH
SU~ ~A~ A~ ~ ~ COST OF SU~ ABAT~
OF SAID ~S~CES, ~ DECKING ~ID ~W TO BE A
LIEN ~PON SA~ PROP~TY IN ~ ~ AS SH~ BY
PORT OF T~ C~ ~GER OF DE~Y ~, FLORIDA.
(~pY of ReSolution No. 44-66 is attache~, to ~e official copy of
these minutes.) See ~ges ~.~.,~:
Resolution~ No. 44-66 ~aS ~n~m~u~ly -passed' a~"adopt~d on ~h~s
first and final reading, on motion by ~. ~l~t and .se~nded by
~ders.
- 8.b. ~e City Cle=k presented O~I~ NO. 63-66.
~ O~I~ OF ~ CI~ CO~C~L OF ~ CI~ OFDEL~Y.
B~, F~R~A, ~ING ~ ~ CITY OF DEL~Y B~
CERTAIN ~S L~.~IN SE~ION 20, ~SHIP 4~ S~TH,
~GE 43 EAST, ~I~ LA~S ~ CO~IGUOUS ~ E~STING
M~CIP~ LIMITS OF ~ID CITY~ ~DEFINING T~ BO~IES
OF SAID C~ TO IN~E SAID ~S~.PRO~DI~ FOR T~
RiG~S '~'~O~GATIONS '0F SAID"~S~ ~' PRO~Di~ FOR
~ ~ T~0F, . {East ~f~ Ch~cb ~u~ing;o~ ~W. 10th St.)
There berg no objection' ~o'ord!nance No.; 63-6~';' S~d-'~dinance was
AN O~XNANCE OF T~ CITY OF DE~Y B~. F~RIDA, ~NG
~ ass~ss=~s as sao~ ~ ~ ass~ss=~
WAY OF V~IOUS S~ETS IN ~ I~S~ SE~ OF T~ CITY AS
ID~IF~ ~I~ER.
Ordinance No. 65-66 was unanimous!y placed on ~!rs~ =ea4~ng, on
"After '~onsi~erati0n' ~f a~I.~pinions-at ~e h~aring
"reVi~w- of the abov~ deacribed: proper.ties~ the.
and Zonin~ Board; voted...~n~m0u~ly.~ de,er, a~.'
· ' ' '~n' ~e zoning Ordinance .i~ completed." -.
City clerk Wor~hi~g in~0~d council tha~ ~. Ar~ Smith, Director
of Pla,nlng~ Zo~ing a~a"Inspection, has arra,ged fo~ a~'p~ic hearing
be held at 8:00 p.M., ~ur~d~y, January ~, 1967,. in. the ~uncil
o~ ~he City. ZO~.lhg o~dinance', a~ :that said 'p~li=. hearing
~ ~a.' pointed ou~ that aa~d p~lzc hear!n9 wou!~ be a" meetlhg.
10.x. City M~nager Oatchel re,fred to Council that .some of the mate-
rials needed to complete the Adul.t Re. creation Complex in the city Park
had just been received, 'and 'that the ceiling, electrical ina~lation,
painting, plumbing, et~., would be completed this week, t~
tractor contemplates sealing ~/ue terrazzo fioor next .T~eSd~# January
~rd, 1~67, and' the building should' then be completed, ex~9~ for a few
minor items.
10.x. Hr. Jurney commended retiring Councilman Saunders for the fine
work he had ~one as a Councilman t~e past two years. The other Council-
men voiced their agreement to that statement.
10.x. City Manager Oatchel said the re~orts had been received that
were requeste~ of the Consulting Engineers and Fisoal Age~%s re~at£ve
to a possibility of construction of a Water Treatment Facility and
available funds, etc. and consideration o£ possible exteneion of the
present sewer 'construction program.
Wednesday, January 11th, 1957, at 8=00 P.M. was the date set for a
meeting with the Consulting Engineers and Fiscal Agents on this item.
10.x. Mr. Saunters referred to a Resolution that had been received
from the Delray Beaoh Civic League 'r~g'ardi~g ~he.'lawleseness which
transpired on Hallowee~ night,.~ and' said. ~hat organl~.ation has requested
a meeting with. the ~ouncil and {the ~li~e -Department that should be
held in the sear future.
!0.a. Clty'Clerk Worth£ng presented B'ills for Approval as follows:
General Fu/md '$ 213,425.49
Water Operating & Maintenance Fund 5; 172..34
Water' Revenue Fund 41,178 ~ 60
Special Assessment Fund 45.50
Refundable Deposits Fund 3,123.78
Improvemen~ Fund 571.48
Capita~ Improvements ~Construction Fun~ 19,~529.74
Sewer Construction Trust Fund 2,117.60
The bills .were unan~£mously ordered.~paid, on motion by Mr. Jurney
and seconded by Hr. Saunders.
The meetingkadjourned at 9:14 P.M.
City Clerk
APPROVED:
MgYOR ~
282-A
CiTY OF DELRAY .BEACH
PALM BEACH COUNTY~' FLORIDA
PROJECT'N02 S96~'~8b
'A~A 11
CF~aNGE ORDER 'NO. 3
This .agreement entered into this 28th day of' De'c'embe~" ,
19 66 , by and between the CITYOF DELRAY BEACH, PALM BEACHCOUNTY, FLORIDA,
as par:y of the FIRST part,'and ~UMBY 8 STI~PSON, INC. as party of the 'SECOND
part, the same being a change or supplement to a certain Contract by and be-
:ween the parties'.aforesaid, dated'December 27, 1'96S for the construction of
a Sewerage Works Project in Area~ll in the~CITY'.OFDELRAY BEACH, PALM BEACH
COU~fY,. FLORIDA~
'WITNBSSBTH:
I. ~fHEREAS, the partyof the FIRST part desires'to amend the Contract
to provide for the addition of several convenience and bettermgnt
items to Lift Station Il-A, which haVebeen requested by the
Sewer Superintendent,
- and -
~IEREAS, the addition of these-items is concurred in by your
consult%ng ~ngineers,
- ~nd -
t~K~2REAS, these items are detailed]in Appendix "A" attached
hereto.as mu integral par~ of this change Order.
II. ZqEREFORE, the partyof the SECOND part .agrees to construct
the' additional items as detailed in Appendix "A", furnishing
all necessary labor, material, and supplies~ at a total lump
s~m price of,$269.00. The'total addition to th~s Contract
will be Two HUndred, Sixty~Nine Dollars ($2~@.00).
282-B
III. It is further agreed and undergtood that the Contract time will
not be extended, and that this change shall not alter in any
manner the force'and effect of the original Contract dated
December,27, !965, and the same shall stand in full force and
effect in all respects~except as amended'by this .agreement.
Recommended for Approval:
RUSSELL ~..AXON, CONSULTING
ENGINEERS~ INCORPORATED BUMBY ~ STIMPSON, INC.
Pr o j e c~i~r Acc,pted:.,'/
CI~ OF D~L~Y B~ACH
Approved as to fo~: PAL~ ~ACH CO~
~ ~ C DEL'Y BEACH' FLORIDA
'~,~ ,, /, ..... ~', ,, ,
City. Atto~ey B ~o
City Manager
A:test:
· ' 282-C
APPENDIX "A"
..... TO
CHANGE ORDER NO. 3
PROJECT..NO~.5964-8b
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA
Additional miscellaneous items to Lift Station Il-A, as requested'
by'Sewer Superintendent:
~.-- 1. Increase'size of concrete entrance vault to S' x 6",
inside dimensions ' $ 50.00
2. Light'and switch in entrance vault; rack for mounting
electrical equipment in lieu of pole mounting ....... $ 124.00
$. A 4-inch gate'valve and box in vault drain line ' $ 95.00
TOTAL $ 269.00
The total addition to.this Contract by this Ch.ange0rder being Tw01
Hundred, SiXty,Nine Dollars '($269.00)'.
RUSSELL &. AXON, CONSULTING ..
ENGINEERS, INCORPORATED: BUMBy .~ STIMPSON, INC.
. ~.~ ~.~.~. ...... _ .
By - ~ ~¥ . .._~2~:- ~ By '.l~r: .' ~ i~.~,'~~' ' ~.~ .t~i.~t~;.. '~
ci~¥ O~.DELm~ B~AC~
PALM· BL4CH cOUNTY, [ FLORIDA P~0Jm~ ~ 'N0. 5 9~4'8b
CHkNG~ ORDSR N0. 4 .
This.agreement entered into this 28th~ day of December ,
19 66 , by and between the CITY. OF DELl{AY ~BBACH, PALM' BEACH COUNTY,. FLORIDA,
as party of the FIRST part, and BUSBY ~ STLV~PSON, INC. as party of the SECOND
part, the same being a change or supplement to. a certain Contract ,by and be-
tween the parties aforesaid, dated December'~27,~ 1965 for the construction o£
a Sewerage Works Project in Area ll of the' CITY OF DELRAY bEACH, PALM BEACH
COUNTY,. FLORIDA. '
WITNESSETH:
I. WHEREAS, the party of the FIRST part.desires to amend the Contra~ct
to reconcile the final quantities as constructed with:the quantities
as originally bid, .
- and -
WHeReAS, final constructed quantities are Set'forth in Final Estimate
No. 9,
- and -
~££2REAS, a discussion of the differences which e~ist~.between the bid
qu~nti~cies and the Constructed' quantities is.attached' as Appendix
to this change order, .
,!
- a~nd -
YK-~AS, Final Estimate No. 9 and Appendix "A" are, by reference,
made an integral part iof this change Order,
- mud -
~EPd~AS, this change order, when s.iEned'by all parties thereto,
constitutes final acceptance by the CITY'OF DELRAY BEACH of all
work carried out under this Contract.
282-E
II. 'THE~FORE, The' party of the' SECOND part .agrees that this final
reconciliation cha~ge Order supersedes mny and all previous
correspondence or verbal .agreements regarding deletions or
additions to~ the Scope of the work carried out under this
Contract dated Deceraber 21,. 1965 for the Construction of a
Sewerage Works Project located' in'Area 11 of the CITY OF DBLRAY
BEACH, PALM' BEACH~COO~TY~. FLORIDA, mud the party of the SECOND
part further .agrees that: all' qumutiti~s' ~nd prices she~ 'on the '
attached Final Estimate: are corre'ct, ~d that the ~ount of
Forth-Nine ~0usmnd, Four H-=dred' Seventy-One Dollars =d Si~ty-
Four Cents'($~9,'471'.64): constitutes' final pa~ent, including
retainag~, for all maC,rials fu~ish~d~ ~d work perfo~ed' ~der'
~his Contract, all in accord~ce With the te~s of the o~iginal
Contract..
III. It is further .agreed ~d ~derstood that this change order shall ·
not alter· in ~y manner] the maintenmnce, ~d.perfo~ce.
ties of the o~iginal Contract d~ted December ;27.,: 1965 ~nd' the'
s~e Shall·stud in full force:~d effect in.all·respects.
Recommended for Approval:
RUSSELL' ~.-AXON, CONSULTING -
ENGINEERS, INCORPORATED ' BUMBY. ~ STIMPSON, INC.
CITY OF D~L~Y BEACH
PALM BEACH CO~
Approved as to fo~: D~L~Y B~A~, FLORIDA
i
/{ Cit~ At~o~y ~ Mayor
City Manager
28~-F
CiTY OF DELRAY .BEACH
PALM BEACH..COUNTY, FLORIDA
SE]~2RAGE WORKS ~PROJBCT
Project No, S964~8-b Area' 11
APPENDIX '"A" TO.'CH~MGE ORDER NO. 4
1. The purpose~of this Appendix is to explain.the reasons for all ~ignifi-
cant variations.in.quantities and paymentsbetween those carried on the
origi.al Contract, and thosecarried on the Final Estimate%
2. Variations of '$4,000. or less are considered to'be Well within normal
eiTectations for underground work of thischaraczer and magnitude, so
this.discussion will be Confined to those items where the variation
e~ceeds this amount.
5. 'Item S covers stage excavation and backfill. This.item'under-ran
' $4',0791., due to the fact that certain sewer lines were deleted. The
deleted lines ran to mostly County areas, where annexation did not
appear to be i~minent.
4. Item'lS covers 6-inch pipe house service Connections. This item
under,ran $6~156. due to the'fact that house connectionsto County.
areas were deleted.
S. Item"59 covers asphalt'driveway replacement. This.item over-ran
$$,792. due to the"fact that many driveways and parking areas had
been paved'since the plans were prepared. Also, it.Became necessary,
in the field, to.shift the route Of long Force:Main:Il from the street
to the parking areas zo'avQid u~uderground obstacles. A correspond%rig
saving was realized in pavement replacement.
6. Note chan~e Order No. I for seeding. Here we originally set up $4~000.
However, after seeding the most important areas, a long spell of rainy
weather set in and natural vegetation took over. This:resulted in an
underZrun of $2',199.
7. ~e final result of all over-runs and undergruns was a NET UNDER-RUN
of $16,827. This is considered to,be a very close ~igure for a job of
this size and difficulty,
8. ~nis Appendix, consisting of one page, is .agreed to by the Contractor and
the Consulting Engineers.
RUSSELL ~ AXON
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. BUMBY ~ STIMPSON, INC%
28~-G
CONTRACTOR?S RELEASE
Before me, the undersigned authority in said County and State,
appeared __~,~.~.,.;_s~.~.~, ., who, being first duly sworn,
deposes and says that he is,~ ........... ~ ......... of
a company and/St coroorati~"~no?'~'~-~%~-do ouszness unaer ~ne
S~werage Works
laws of Florida~ which is the contractor on cc~nc~o, SD64-~b - Area 11.
--~'ame of project)
located in City Of ~D.~lray~.Beac%, County of Palm Beac%, Florida,
with the City of Delray Beach~ dated the ~th day of
!9 ....
that the said deponen~ is authorized to make this affidavi%~ and so
states as follows, "I certify, according to the best of my know-
ledge and belief, that the.said contract has been complied with in
every particular by said contractor, that all work has been per-
formed and/or materials supplied in full'~coordance with the terms
and conditions of the contract; that there are no bills remaining
unpaid for labor, material, or otherwise, in connection with said
contract and work, and that there are no suits pending against thc
undersigned as contractor or anyone in connection with the work
done and materials furnished or otherwise under said contract.
Deponent further says that the final estimate which has been sub-
mitted to the City simultaneously with the making of this affidavit
constitutes all claims and demands against the City on account of
said contract or otherwise, and that acceptance of the s~:m specified
in said final estimate will operate as a full and final release and
discharge of the City from any further claims, demanCs or cumpen-
cation by contractor under the above contract. Deoonent further
agrees that all guarantees under this contract sha~l start and be
in full force from the date of this release as spelled out in the
contrac~ documents."
.. .. ~ ..... ,~ ,'~ ~, .'
Title
Sworn %o and suscribed to before me
My Co~ission expires .
NOTARY PUSL~g, STA~E o~ ~LORIDA ~t
~y OO~ISSION EXPIRES eOT, 3, 1969
· ' . '282-H
SET~%OE ~:;O?QL~ P~OJECT ~.FJ~Y E~A~, ~.. PR~E~ NO. 5964-8b
~PE OF PROJ~: L~T~ON
NAME OF C~T~OK CONT~ NO
~ ~ S'~O ~xcav. ~nd ~ckfll~
~ 1~ ~ 18 pi~, ~lO'cug 390, ~ 5.~ 1,950 261 1,305 00 645 00 67
%~' ~ 18"pi~,l~l~'cu~ J 'l~O ~ ~.~ 7,5~ 1299 7,794 00 -.294 00 0C
- 10.10~ 5,777
~8 pi~,l~-i4'cuZ 57Z ~ 596 6,019 60 -242 40
4 ~e e~v. ~d ~fi] 2.50 J
8,10 ~ 12"~6'cut I~ ~ 38,4~ ~ 15047 37,617 SO 832 50 g8
5 ~e5,10 aexc~v'i2" ~nd ~ckfll~ h~ 3.25 75 ~00 4,078J 75
Dl~,B-8'cu~ I~ 1 ~ 4S~85 75 13596 44,1~7 91
6 S~ ex~v. ~nd ~fl!~ t 4.35 t '
8,10 a 1~" pl~,8-10'cuZ 4905 ~ ~1,597 4704 20,462 40 1,155 55J 95
~.10 996
a¢O l~j ~ . 7,~a ~ 6,075 60 1,732 40 78
8,i0 ~ 12 pi~,12-~4'Cu~ 1~0 ~ ~.70 ~,~2 ~ ,216~20 -1,124 20 100.
j [O
m. ~ install 18" ~.C.
Se';;~ pi~ 1712 ~ 6.O5J 10,357 1662 ,055 502 50 97
~rn, ~ i~t~11 15" ~.C,
13 ~am. ~ Install 12" ~.C. 3~O
~r pi~ ~ 2.6 2772~ 7,545 80
~ewer pi~. . 2480 ~ 4,9~0 4,692 00
~4~ ~u~.~e~ar ~pi~in~all 8" V.C. 33171 ~ '~,123 3 51569 41,039 70 2,,
'fed clay pi~ se~lce j
~ctto~ 19~79 ~ 1.7( 33,794 3 ~ 16258 27,638 6,155
~ect io~ 1.5 0 0
Furn, & in~tall I2" J
Cc~ i~n ~rce ~in 5.S~
Purn. h install I0"
.... ~ ~st i~n fo~ r:~.ln 4.5 O~ 2351
282vI
· Page 2:
5964-8b
P. O. ~x 2608
~ & STil~SON~ IRC. ADDRESS Orlandn: Fln~tdn CONT~NO,
NAME OF CONTRACTOR
FINAL
V.C. ~ ~ s~p~ I~ Ea 49.00 6~ ~ 19 931 0 245
V.C. ~ea a stop. rs 6 Ea 35.00 8 280 0 - 70
174
210 ~
~ V.C. ~e~ & ~toppers 47 Ea 14.50 681 5( 35 507 50
~" 6" 5~ 5(
V.C. wyes & stop,fa ~9 ~ 17.50 32 560 O0
~ ~rn. & latall 8" 6'
V.C. ~yes & s~op~ 572 11.~ 6,292 Ol 538 5,918 ~00
24 ~rn. t l~t~ll 6"x 4"
V.C. ~e bran~
s~op~r~ 8 1] .00 88 ~ ........
25 ~. ~teria!: i ~tru ~
shatlo~ ~ol~s 41 18(,.~ 7,380 O~ 38 6,84C O0
aid. 4' ~ole3 113 20(.00 S2,600 ~ 115 22,600 O0 ....
[ Z9 ~rn. materials & const~
[add'l yeti. d~pth of 4'
I.D. std. ma~oles 334 2~.O0 7,682 O( 542.52 7,877 96 - 195
drop ~ole pipi~ 68 2(.50 1,394 ~ 64.49 1,322 04 71
31 ~urn. ~ l~ta!l plugged
=tu~ in ~holes, var.
size~ ~ depths 11 Ea 12.00 132 O(' 18 216 00 -84 00
00
32 ~rn. ~eri~l & cons%~C
c~s~i~S 110 ~ 43.~ 4,730 ~ 110 4,730 ....
33 Furn. ~a~riml & conm~c
12" force ~ln
crossin~ on U.S. 1 30 LF 44.00 ~,7~0 ~ 147 6,468 00 - 748 00
12"
for~ ~In cu,-in to
3 existi~ ~le 1 Ea 140.00 140 ~ ' 2 280 00 - 14 00
.5 AdJ~t inlet ~ S~ 70 O~ L.S. 70 00
~~'~7 ~lO~te 2~" ~ter pi~ 80 ~ 1.70 136 ~, 80, 58,831 136 O0
i
~ Total ~ 50 -287 0
282-J
Page 3.
~lt drivc.~y pavement
r~placemen~ 115 SY 3.001 ~,15100 1579 4,157 O0 -3,792 O0 100+
oonc. $1de~Ik mplac~-.~n~ 40 ~ ~.50 180 ~ 5.55 24 ~8 155 02 14
~pl~ 35 S~ 8.40~ ~Z4 ~ ........ 224 00 0
~rb ~place~n~ 5 ~ 4.~ ZO ~ 5 20 O0 .... 100
hoddinj ~terial · 35~ ~ 0.01 36 ~ ........ 35 0
t~m~ 5 ~ 32.~{ 160 ~ 2.1 68 ~0 . 91 20~ 4
~ddi~ o~d in ~itin
by ~ho ~ineer 75 ~ 5.~ 375 ~ ....... 375 O0
~l~r left in place 1 ~ 1.~ 1 ~ 1 00
~F 1.00 2 ~ 2 O0
tier 2
~ eq~l~nt ~ ~n~truct
ready for ~e in accord.
with the appli~ble drawl:
~ z~ce. ~ furnimhin~ l%e~
of ~Jor e~l~. ~od in
the c~cm.
a. Site ~ork-Pavi~ ~
c~di~ . S~ 900 ~ 900 O0 .... 100
8,~94 . L.S. 8,6P4~00
i:~, etc. ~-~ S~ I00
cincture ~
~t~ctu~ L~ ~ ~l,SS L.S.: 21,568 O0 I00
d. Buildi~
v~nttlation L=~ S~ 8,8~ O0 L.S. 6,600 .... I00100
~. ~tal~ J ~ S~~ 3,3~[ O0 3,325
~:- ....... . ~ ,8
Paze 4.
596~ 8b
P. O. ~x 2G08
NAME OF CONT~O~ ~7f ~% ~~[Cw ADDRESS ~~z. CONT~ NO.
FINAL
h. Paintin~
Film. ~ll l~bor, material
& equiD. & construc~ L.S.
tlA complete ~ ready for
use ia accord, with the
applicable drawings and
specs. ~ furnishing items
of major equip, named in
the specs.
a. Site ~ork 570 ....
b. gxcav.-refill, dewatez
ing, etc. 4,984
c. Cone. work &'wet well 4,622
d. Prefab lift stations 1 11,915
e. Cast iron pipe &
galv. pipe & valves 1,525
f. P~inting 125
g. Electrical 1,700
TOTAL ~ THiS SHEET 44,775 00 0 00
487,934.40
. ,. , Page 5.
4,000 0~ 1,801 30 2,198
I :4/1 Seeding 70
2 ~4/1 ~Sewer extension - Lake Drive 6,681~60 6,681 60 .....
3 Lift Station llA additions 269:00 269 00 .....
4 Reconciliation 14,628 32
} ~,,~, " "10,95~'~0... ' ~,751~ 16,827 02
2. ~,%LYS~ OF A~U~T~O CO~T~;,CT Af~OU~T TO DATE
C- ~s~: ~ct~on= ~c~ tn ~1~ 7 ~ove 16,827.02 ,
~ ~J~ ~utra~t ~t ~ da~e 482,057.98 .
8,751.90
3. ~t~ v~ or ~rk ~fo~d ~ d~to
~ ~t ~ o~ on ~tr&ct ~k ~ dmte 482,057.98
7, ~s: ~t of ~to~ ~a~t~ 4~2 ~586
q. CE~TI~ICATIO~ OF ¢O~T~,CTOR
Xccordln~ to the best of ~*y knowledge e. nd bel&e~- I certify that ~ll ~t~s ~d ~ts s~ on the f~e
~ Bb%4By 8 STIMPSQ~LNC, d~DECEMBER,,27t la ~, ~or ~ly ~thori,~
(Cont~ ~or~
~at ~ ~a~ Of ~ho ~ce ~e ~la Painte h~ bo~n ~/v~d: FIN~
~AN, 3, X96~, ~ SEPT. ~0s ~,t~ClU~iv~ ~ ~ ~ ~aCofm~ ~wledge ~ beliar it la
~tertal i~l~ ~ ~.~ ~tl~te ~o, 9 has ~ t~tod by ~ ~or ~y duly auC~rlz~ rep-
282-M ~
ASSESSMENT ROLL
For construction of sidewalks five feet in width within the st=set
rights-of-way of various streets in the Western sector of the City
aS follows:
1. On the Bast side of N. W. Sth Avffnue'from Atlantic Avenue to
N. W. 2nd street;
2. On the East side of N. W. 10th Avenue from atlantic Avenue to.
the South line of Lot 6, sioCk.'C, WeSt Side Heights;
3. On the Bast side of N. W. 10th Avenue from 2nd to 3rd Streets;
4. On the South side of N. W. 2nd Street from 10th to 14th Avenues;
5. On the Bast side of N. W. 14th Avenue from Atlantic Avenue to
2nd Street less Lot 23, Block
6. On the Bast side of S. w, 14th Avenue from Atlantic Avenue to
3rd Street;
?. On the Bast side of S. W. 11th Avenue from 2nd to 3rd Streets;
8. On the Bast side of S. W. 10th Avenue from Atlantic Avenue to
2nd Street;
9. On the Bast side of S. w. 8th Avenue from Atlantic Avenue to
3rd Street;
10. On the South side of 8. W. 2n~ Street from 5th to 11th Avenues;
11. On the South side of S; W. 3rd Street from 8th to 13th Avenues.
ASSBSSMENT per front foot
$1.22556
So,uth half· West 26:' .of SoUth. 140
· uth ,SO. of.~orth . , ' .... : ' '
'_'100' of, Lot 25 F-ties lto,d, ge Jones SO., 61.28
4 l~0~,th ~:;'1' hr'Lo%' 25 !~lease Eodge 51.~ 62.63
West .72' of Sou~ 135'. Winston a Juanita
3 North 130' of ~ 'th
265' 0f WeSt 1'35' ..........
3 *Sou~h 50'~ of N~r~h. ~- 159,32
1:97.. ~0f~.~t 135' Jones * ' ' 50 6i',28
Page 2. ASSESSMBNT ROM - SZDEWAI~E~- Western Sector
P~OP~R~ ~om,
~s~o~ ~ ~ ASS'
2.
~$O~ 17-46-43.
Bast 100~ of ~s~ 125~ of ~u~
134~ of ~u~ % of ~t I0 less
~=~ 16 ~ of ~=~ 150~-of
274.8~ of Sou~ % of ~t 10
West 25 ~. ~zry ~o~ ~6 19.61
~u~ 45' of Nor~ 189.35~ oE
Eas~ 125' of ~st 150' of ~uth ~ff & Less{e
~ of ~ 10. ~ 4S 55.15
Sou~ ~.95~ oE No=~ I44.35r of .... '
~s~ 1~~ .Of ~st 1~0~ of ~u~ ~arl~e & Julia
~ o~ '~ 10. B=~ley ~4.95 55.09
~ox~ 99,4~ of Sas~ 125' o~ ~est 8ai~ly ~
150' of SoUth % of ~t 10. ~omas 99.4 121.82
3.
~ZST 'N~K
A 1'6 O.D. Priest, J=. 23.6 28.92
A 15 ~.RV~OLp~ Jo~eon 40 49.02
A 14 Vernon ~mp 40 49.02
A 13 ~ence ~att ~ 49~'02
A 11 a 12 ~ ~e Nelson 80 98.04
A 8 & 9 ~e a Earnest~e
J~s 80 98.04
A 7 g1{zar & John
A~erson 40 49.02
A 6 ~a ~:11ace 40 49.02
A 5 Ellen D.. W~t~n 40 49.02
A 4 g!len D. Wight~n 40 49.02
A 1, 2 & 3 ~arles' & Alyce
~rt 120 147.07
4.
2 24 ~zeE ~bson '~13~. I8 166.90
2 1 Jo~ W. Jrt'. ~ ~ude
A., ~omas '-" I36. !8 166.90
1 24 ~. D. & E~a ~e
K~tchens '** ~* t~36.24 166
SE~ZON 17-46-4~.
North 1257 Of ~% of ~t 2 less
West 5?2,28' and less North 25~ a Z, C. a
less East 25' M, Sml~ 75. ~ 92.
2 6 Wt~sto, L. &
~uanita J. Davis 75.78 92.8~
2 5 , -~u~ & ~ ~ke~ 75.78
2 4 Ellen** D. W~h~ 80 98.04
i 7 Ja~S~ L. ~ith' ' ~'65.7 80,52
I W~11~e' & Lula ~e
' Will~ams 60.35 73.96
I ~ ~ ~I~.D, ~gh~=an 60.35 73.96
~ 4 ~11ian ' Storr 70 85.79
282~5~ ~
Page 3. ASSESSMENT ROLL - SIDEWALKS - Western Sector
PROPERTY FRONT TOTAL
D?.S,CR~TION OWNER
5.
BLK. LOT
i 11 Minnie ~. '~Owell 120 147.07
I 21 & 22 ,~innie L. Crowe11 106.65 130.70
I 24 Thelma A. Priest 50 61.28
1 25 ~. Elsie Brinkley 50 61.28
I 26 '", Ethel Mae Austin
Williams 50 61.28
1 27 a 28 Annie & Connie
Pierce 100 122.56
1 29 Johnnie Gipson 56.34 69.05
.A,.~ ,J. JOHNSON
LOT
10 & 11 Eva Johnson 100 122.56
6 .& 7 Dorothy Johnson
Mitchell 100 122.56
3 Leonard Robinson 50 61.28
2 '~; "'-'-',~:~ ~'? ACLi, -- ,-;T~': ~,..~,k.-~en.e~a .,Nelson 63.11 77.34
· 1 2 Louise D. Meade 65 79.66
.'1~ ..... 3 Louise D. Meade 65 79.66
'!~:. .'~4 Lillian Storr 118 144.62
6.
4' 21 ' ~iil£e '& ~.stella
' -.,. o... & Mae
' Lockett ' 50 61.28
/4 ~:~' 2'~':~'''''''': .i; Marion & Maxie
4 25 " Ait~,rt'~N.. ~' '-' "'& Grace
DiMarzio 50 ,, 61.28
4 26 ~l]~,,han8~' .Bonaby ,. 5.0 ' 61.28
4 2 ? -~l, 0r~nee. 8onaby 50 6~, 28
4. 28 -: ~::',~,'? ,':~-!~ ,';~?' ."~!-'M~-nnt'e r,ee'Ce~is 50 61:28
4 ... 29. Estella Palmer 50.43 61.80
"AT~ANTXC PAra,(,
LOT
i Pe!£ce Po James
2 ~lice" Pi 'james
Le'd~etter ~0 61.28
. ,3' P~lice P: James
.... L~dbetter- 50 61.28
. &~ Priest Land~.CO~Inc.50 6~.2S
7; Pal~ ~ach":C0un~y'
~o~rt~es Inc. .~0 :6'~.
8 .~ ~,~m)Beach% County
,. ~ro~'ies ~nC. 50, e~. 2e
Page 4. ASSSBSMENT: P. OT, L - 8ZDBWALKS - ~estern Secto=
6.
~S~. a~c P~ ~s (con' ~.)
· 9 Palm ~ach ~u~ty
Pro~rties Inc. 50 61.28
10 Palm Beach County
~o~rt~es Inc. 50 61.28
'' 11 ~lm Beach County
~ope~es Inc. 50 61.28
12 Palm Beach ~ty
~o~rties Inc. 57.41 70.36
BLK. ~
4 1 Pa~ Beach Co.tM
~o~rties Inc. 57.21 70.11
4 2 Palm Bea~ Co~ty
~o~rties ~c. 50 61.28
.4 3 Palm ~ach Co~ty
Pro~rt~es I~. 50 61.28
4 4 Palm ~ach Co~ty
~operties Inc. 50 .61.28
4 ~5 Palm Bea~ Co~ty
· . '~o~rties Inc. 50 61.28
4 6 Palm ~a~ County
Prope=t~es Inc. 50 61.28
4 7 ~lton R. Gruver 50 61.28
4 8 Fulton R. Gruver 50 6~28
4 9 Fulton R. Gruver 50 61.28
4 10 Fulton R. Gruver 50 61.28
4 11 ~lton R. Gruver 50 61.28
4 12 ~lton R. Gruver 57.2 70.10
7.
BLK. ~
10 1 O.D. $r. a ~el~
~i ~Aeat 57 69.86
10 2 ~roy & ~en B.
Ellis 50 61.28
10 3 O.D. ~r~ a Thel~
'~ ~est . ' - 50 61.28
10 4 Josephine a Frank
Fletcher 50 61.28
10 5 Luvon~a Harmon
Br~ 50 61.28
l0 6 O.D. Sr'J~ & ~el~
A. Priest 50 61.28
10 7 ~an~el & ~vonia
Holmes 50 61.28
10 8 ~orge ~art Jr. ~0 61.28
10 9 Arthu= Lee a ~n~e
'~e Holl~day 50 61.28
10 ~0 O.D. Sr. & ~elma
A. ~Eiest 50 61.28
~0 11 ~more ~r~ 50 61.28
10 12 O.D. Sr. & Thelma
282-0
Page 5. ASSESSMENT ROLL - SIDEWALKS - Western Sector
PROPERTY FP~)NT TOTAL
.,D~SCRIPTIO~ OWITER FOOTAGE
8.
BLKo LOT
I 1 J.C. & Hi3dreth
Williamson 98.4 120.59
1 7 Beatrice &
1 8 ~ Royal 63.4 77.70
. Spurgeon & Emma H.
Herring 50 61.28
1 9 a 10 Ernest C. Tynes 100 122.55
i 11 Viola a Amos
1 12 ,~. Mitchell 50 61.28
~.. ~larence R. · ·
Livingston 50 61.28
i 13 Homer & Annie. Doris
Bean SO 61.28
1 14 & 15 Bonnie & Frankie
Adams 114 139,. 71
West half of 1,& 2 Khalas & Inez
5 Virgil Stubbs 50 61.28
~ ~ 6... ,. Issac Williams 50 61.28
...... ;.7' ~- -
:~ ,:~. Emma Mackey
St.rayhorn - 50 61.28
a =~mes .L. & Ar;rife
~..salsa.. ': ......,7. so ~ ''~'' '
:6:[ .'28
! L~[:i'l~ie' P. W~Iy 50 61.28
10 Si?=man -. 50'''~ 6f.'2e
Il ~n &.' Effio ~ean 50 6!.28
5- 12 P~'iiit '~":Co: Z~C;50 6~.28
5 ~3. ~eit. ~nd .Co,~Inc, 50
5 15 PZte~'~ ~nd Co,~nc,'5'O 61.28
~e & .Do~o~y ~one50 61.2~
6' ~rth 50' of West half of i'~rae1 a :~mie ''
sZock ~hc& -~ - 5o 6z,; 2s
Sou~h 50' of No=~h 100' o~ ~&~'~ & :~s~be1~ "'
west half cE Block ?R~b~r%$ " 50 - 6~;28
6' ~u~ 50' of North 150' of~.&,Ora B~!1~
West half of Blo~ ~an ....... :" ~ '
so, 200.
west half of BlO=k ~ ....... 5~ 6i~.28~
Sou~ 50~ of North 250' of...~hel~a:Williams &
.... west half of Block ~v~a~ ~rt~n 50 61.28
Page 6. ASSESSMENT ROLL - SIDEWALK~ - WESTERN SECTOR
PROPERTY FRONT TOTAL
BLKo LOT
6 South 50' of North 300~ of T~omas Clinton
West half of BlOck Harris 50 61.28
6 NOrth 53,05' of South' Sherman & Lillian
312.20' of West 151.40' A~le 53.05 65.02
6 North 53.05' of South Robert & Louise
259.15' of west 151.42~ Odums 53..05 65.02
6 North 53.05' of SoUth Fred & Louise
206.10' of West 151.44* Jones 53.05 65.02
6 North 53.05' of South Mary Maggie
153,05' of West 151.46' McClendon 53.05 65.02
6 North 50~ of South ~00"': Of Willie James Sr. &
.. West half of Block Josie spells 50 61.28
6 South 50' of'~st half of. W~ll$e James sr. &
Block J0sie Spells 50 61.28
LOT
5 John M. & Lenox&
O. Holly 98 120.10
6 " ,. Vernon Kemp 94 1i5.20
15 ',~ck K. Maynard 94 115.20
16 ,Jack K. Maynard 94 115.20
25 Jack K. Maynard 94 115,20
26 Se&crest, Inc. 94 115.20
10.
BLK. LOT
23 1" .O.D. Priest, Sr. 156 165.45
15 49, 50, 5'1 and 52 H,i G. & Celestine .
· '; ' poitier 108.1 132.48
!5 48 Charlie & Matilda
Jehnson 25 30.64
15 2, ~, '4 an~ 5 Carl Lee Fashaw 100 122.55
15 i Carl Lee Pashaw 33.1 40.56
CARVER. SQUAR~
LOT
I William & Rosa
Lee Odom 56.09 68.74
2 and 3 Ros~ Lea Newman 111 136.03
4 Ernest & Joan
Williams 55.5 68.02
5 John M. & Lenora
Holly 55. $ 68.02
NE% OF SE% OF SW% leas ,Board o~ Public
North, South, East a West Instruction of
25 feet thereof Palm Beach County 633.8 776.76
~LK. LOT
10 13 Char'lea W. Jr. &
F~'iancenia~ G.
Pa .~rick 13~. 8~? 168.97
10 1 O.D. Sr. i Thehua
A. Priest 137.8~ 168.97
282-P~
page 7. ASSESSMENT ROLL - SIDEWALKS -~W~stern Sector
PROPERTY FRONT ~ TOTAL
DESCRIPTION
i1.
SECTION 17~46-43.
West 79' of East 104' of N% Of
N~ of SE% of SE% of SW% less James &Hattie
North 25' Lue Brown 79 96.82
West 63' of East 167' of N½ of
N~ of SE% of SE% of SW% less Taft, Jr. &
North 25' Mildred Jenkins 63 77.21
West 63' of East 230' of N% of James Robert &
N½ of SE% of SE% of SW~ less Mildred Louise
North 25' 'Hope 63 77.21
WeSt 63' of East 293' of N~ of
N~of SE% of ~SE% of SW% less Cornelius & Alice
North 25~ Mae Henderson 63 77.21
West 63~t of East 356' of N~ of
N~ O£ SE% of S~ of SW% less Prentiss Clifton &
North 25' ~arrie Mae Spivey 63 77.21
West 60' of East 416' of N~ of
N½ of SE% of SE~ of SW% less John L. & Lula
North 25' Mae Bean 60 73.53
WeSt 60' of East 476~ of N% of
N~ of SE% of SE% of SW% less Harry & Dorothy
North 25' Mitchell 60 73.5~
West 60' of East 536" of N½
of N% of SE% of S~% of SW% Earnest &Louise
less North 25' Russell 60 73~53
.West 60' of East-596' of N% of
N~ of SE% of SE% of SW~ less James & Tycena V.
North 25' Moss 60 73.53
N% of N% of SE% of SE% of
less East 596~, less North 25' George & Rosie
and less West 25' ' Lee Hay 64.57 79.13
B~LEHAVE~UNIT B.,.
Lot 1 Maynard &Matteren
Brinson 138.39 169.60
" 20 Lillie Noble 138.39 169.60
Lot 1 Paul & Fannie Ruth
Jones 138.39 169,68
" 20 Willie E. &
Georgia E.Dublin 138.39 !69.6Q
SECTION 17-46-43.
SE% of SW% of SW% leas West 30' Board of Public
Instruction of
Palm Beach County 410.6 503.21
12,855.44
Advertising $ 157.48
Construction Cont=act 28,370.56
E~gineering, Accounting & Collection, 10% 2,837.05
AdvertiSing-Assessment.Roll (est) 138.60
Advertising'~rainan~e Caption (eat) 6.60
$ 31,510.29
Less 50% - City share of cost
Per Resolution No. 6-66 -_ 15,.755.~15
*50~to be assessed $ 15,755.14
282-Q
DARt December 22, 1966
· O~ David M. GatcheL
FROMt T.E. Weber
SUBJECT: Insurance BidS
Attached is an analysis of bids for the City's 1967 insurance
whichwere opened at 4~00 P.M. on December 21, 1966.
Considering that the City's insurance for fire and extended
coverage; general liability; automobile physical damage and
liebility; Treasurer - Tax CoLlectors bond~ and employee
blanket bond were awarded on a three year basis last year the
number of bids received this year was good.
It is recon~mendedb¥ the City's supervising insurance agents and
myself that the awards be as foLlows~
I. Bid of phOenix of Hartford Insurance Companies
group jointly to Atlantic Insurance Agency, Inc.
and Plastridge Agency, Inc. fo= Workman's Com-
pensation. EmpLoyers Liability limit of $100,000.
Premium - $24,526.00.
II. Bid of Aetna Insurance Company to GraceyBros. for
Equipment Floater, all risk, $100. deductible for
three years with an annual premium of $811.00.
III. Bid of Aetna Insurance Company to Gracey Bros. for
Water Towers, all risk including collapse and sub-
sidence with $1,000 deductible for three years with
an annual premium of $970.00.
IV. Bid of St. Paul Fire & Marine to ~racey Bros. for a
combined three year accident policy for volunteer
firemen and auxilliary ~olicemen at a premium of'
$668.73 lmayable for the three years and payable at
the inception of the policy.
The City's workman's compensation initial premium has increased
again this year from $20,027.83 to $24,526.00 due to the same
factors respOnsible for the previous increases; increase in
the experience factor and increase in payroll.
1. The FLorida Compensation Rating Bureau has increased
the City's experience modification factor from L.07
to 1.18.
2. Estimated payroll used in computing the bid has been
increased from $929,090 to $1,042,847.
-1-
282-R
The rates used in determinSng the premium on the E~uipment
floater ~olicy is the same as rates paid in 1964 but due
to inclusion of pumps in the sewer lift stations the total
annual premium is increased by $213.82.
The premium for the Water Tower coverage is the same as the
premium paid in 1964.
The average premium of $222.91 for the volunteer firemen and
auxilliary police accident policy compares with a total of
$257.43 paid for the two policies last year.
In conclusion I wish to express my thanks to all of the
insurance agents in the City, without whose help and
wholehearted efforts these very good bids would not have
been possible.
- 2-
282-S
282-T
ORDINANCE ~0. 63-66.
AN ORDINANC~'. OF ~ CI~ ~CIL OP ~ CItY
OF DE~Y ~, F~DA, A~ TO ~ CITY
OF D~Y ~ C~T~IN ~S ~T~ IN SE~ION
20, ~S~P 46 'SOUTH, ~GE 43 EA~, ~
A~ CO~I~OUS ~ ~8T~ M~ICIP~ ~TS OF
~ CITY~. ~DEFINI~ ~ ~~ES OF
~ INCL~E ~'ID ~S'~ ~O~D~ FOR ~
~ O~I~TIO~ OF SAID ~S~ ~ ~O~DING
~ ZO~NG ~OF. -'
~AS, ~' BA~IST ~ OF P~ B~ CO~Y, INC.
iS ~e fee simple o~er of ~e pro~rty here~after descried
and
~As, ~e sa~d ~ ~ST~ ~ OF
~Y, INC., by its ~tition, has consented ~nd g~ven permis-
sion for the annexation of said property by ~e C~y o~ ~lray
~ach, and
~AS, ~e City of ~lray ~ach has heretofo=e
au~orized to a~ex ~nds ~ accordance wi~ Section 185.1 of
~e City ~arter of said C~ty granted to it by ~e S~te of
P10rid~ ~
~ CI~ OP DE~Y ~, F~RIDA, AS ~OL~
SE~ION 1. ~t ~e City Council of the City 'of Del=ay
Beach, Palm Beach Co~ty, Flori~, hereby a~exes to said City
the ~o11~ing flesori~d ~ac~ of land lo~te~ in Palm ~a~
~ty. Florida, ~ich lies contiguous to said City,
~at tract o~ land in ~ction 20, ~ship
46 South, ~nge 43 East, Palm Bea~
Florida, descried as follows:
~e East half of the North ~lf of ~e East
~a=ter o~ ~t 29. ~ction 20. To.ship 46
~u~, ~nge 43 East, according to Plat ~k
1, Page 4, ~lic ~coras of Palm ~ach ~ty,
Florida.
SE~ION 2. ~at ~e bo~daries of ~e
City
~lray
~ach, Florida, are hereby redefined so as to include ~erein
~e a~ve descried tract of land, and said land ia hereby de-
clared to be wi~in ~e co~or~te limits of ~e City of ~lray
~ach, Florida.
SE~ION 3. ~at the tract of land hereina~ve describ-
ed is hereby declared to be in Zoning District R-iA, as defined
by existing ordi~n~s of ~e City of ~lray ~ach,. Florida, and
permissive u~e is hereby gran~d for improvement of said pro~r-
ty for ch~ch and educational put. sss.
282-U
Page 2~ Ordinance ~o.
S~CTZON 4. That the lands hereinabove described shall
immediately b~come subject t~.'aI1 of t~e franchises, privileges,
immunities, debts, ~0bligations, liaBili~ies, ordinances and laws
to which lands"in.tha City"'of'Delrmy BeaCh are now or may be, ex-
cept as otherwise provided in Chapter 192.~6' ~f the Florida Stab-
utes, 196.~, and persons residing thereon ehall~'be deemed citizens
of the City of Delray Beaoh.
SECTION 5.: That i'~ any word,..phraSe, clause, sentence
or'p~rt of this ordinance shall be declared'illegal by a court
of competent ~uriadiction, such record of illegality aha11 in
no wayaffect the
PASSED in regular Session on the second and final read-
ing on the '[8'~h day of December , 1966.
/~/ A~'. C..Avery
MAYOR '
ATTEST:
,/~/ R' ~ Wor,thinq , _ _
City Clerk
First Reading December,~12~ ~968
Second Reading December 28, 1966~ . ........
R~SOLUTION NO. 44-66. 282-V
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCllb OF THE CITY OF DELRAY
BEACH, FLORIDA, ASSESSING COSTS FOR ABATING NUISANCES
UPON CERTAIN LANDS LOCATED WITHIN SAID CITY; SETTING
OUT ACTUAL COSTS INC%TRRED BY SAID CITY TO ACCOMPLISH
SUCH ABATEMENT AND LEVYING THE COST OF SUCH ABATEMENT
OF SAID NUISANCES, AND DECLARING SAID LEVY TO BE A
LIEN UPON SAID PROPERTY IN AN AMOUNT AS SHOWN BY RE-
PORT OF THE CITY MANAGER OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Delray Beach, did, in
reqular ~;~//~////////S.e.ssiOnI held on ithe .~2th and 26th of
September .&~ 10.th .of Oc.%obe.rt 19,66 declare the existence of a nui-
aanCe upon certain lots or parcels of land, desc=ihed in a list sub-
mitted to them, for violation of the provisions of Ordinance G-147;
WHEREAS, pursuant to such declaration, the City Clerk .of said
City did furnish each of the respective owners of the la'ds described
in said list with a notice describing the nature of the nuisance and
that they must abate said nuisance within thirty (30) days, failing
in which the CitY Council would have it done, and the cost thereof
would be levied as an assessment against said property,,, and ·
WHEREAS, the owners hereinafter named did fail and neglect to
abate the nuisance existing upon their respective lands within the
time prescribed in said notice and' Ordinance G-147, and the City of
Delray Beach was required to and did enter upon the following lands
and incur costs in abating the nuisance existing thereon aa described
in the aforesaid list; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of Delray Beach, has, pur-
suant to said Ordinance G-ld7 and the City Charter submitted to the
City Council a report of the costs incurred in abating the nuisance
as aforesaid, said report indicating the costs per parcel of land
involved.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH~ CITY
OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
1. That assessments in the individual amounts as shown by the
report of the City Manager of the City of Delray Beach, involving the
City's cost of abating the afor~said nuisances upon the lots or par-
cels of land described in said report, a copy of which is attached
hereto and made a part hereof, are levied against the parcels of land
described on said report and in the amounts indicated thereon. Said
assessments so levied shall be a lien upon the respective lots and
parcels of land..described in said report, of the same nature and to
the same extent as the lien for general city taxes and shall be col-
lectible in the same manner and with the same penalties and under the
same provisions as to sale and foreclosure as city taxes are collect-
2. That the City Clerk of said City shall, as soon as possible
after the effective date, record a certified copy of this resolution
in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court in and for Palm Beach
County, Florida, and shall furnish to each of the owners named in and
upon said report a notice that the City Council of the City of Delray
Beach, did, on the 12th & 26th. of,. SeRtember and ~0th of Oqtob~r. 1966
order the abatement of a certain nuisance existing on their 'described
property and property owner having failed to abate such nuisance,
within the 30 day period, whereupon it was abated by the City at costs
shown in said report and such assessments shall be legal, valid and
binding obligations upon the property against which said assessments
are levied. This resolution shall become effective 30 days from the
date of adoption, and the assessments contained herein shall become
due and payable thir. ty days after the mailing date of the notice of
said assessment, after which interest shall accrue at the rate of 6%
per annum on any unpaid portion thereof.
December , A.D. 1966.
...... MAY
COST OF ABATING NUISANCES UNDER ORDINANCE' NO;'G~147.
PROPERTY ~ESCRIPTIQN OWNER AssEs SME~{,T,,
.September 12t 1966 list.
Lot 15, Block 64 Ruth.E. Kannel $19.50
September 26th~ 1966 list.
Lots 2 & 3, Block B,
Tourist Nook Willard B. Bowe $15.00
Octo, ber 10tht 1966 list.
Lots 10, 11 ~ 12, Block 65 Maisie E. Buerk $25.00