Ord 05-98ORDINANCE NO. 5-98
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 6.1.3(C),
"SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS", AND SECTION
6.1.4(C), "DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS", OF
THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF
DELRAY BEACH, TO PROVIDE FOR THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE
SURFACE TYPES FOR DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS WHEN
APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER; PROVIDING A GENERAL
REPEALER CLAUSE, A SAVING CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to LDR Section 1.1.6, the Planning and
Zoning Board reviewed the proposed text amendments at a public
hearing on December 15, 1997, and forwarded the changes with a
recommendation of approval; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Florida Statute 163.3174(4) (c), the
Planning and Zoning Board, sitting as the Local Planning Agency, has
determined that the changes are consistent with and further the
objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Chapter Six, "Infrastructure and Public
Property", Article 6.1, "Design Standards and Requirements", Section
6.1.3, "Sidewalks", Subsection 6.1.3(C), "Sidewalk Construction
Requirements", of the Land Development Regulations of the City of
Delray Beach, Florida, is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 6.1.3 Sidewalks:
(C) Sidewalk Construction Requirements:
(1) Sidewalks shall be constructed with concrete.
However, when the sidewalk is to function both as a pedestrian way
and a bicycle pathway it may have concrete or asphalt as its finished
surface.
(2) Concrete sidewalks, which are located in
driveways, shall have a minimum depth of f~ six (6") inches~ ~yy
~/~/~Y/~/~Y/~/~/~~/~/~~/~ contain #10 x #10
wire mesh~ ~/~/~~/~/~/~~ and shall be constructed
of Class I concrete with a minimum strength of 3,000 p.s.i.
(3)
Sidewalks shall be constructed through asphalt
driveways.
(4) Sidewalks shall be constructed prior to the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the property upon which
they abut. However, installation of sidewalks within a residential
subdivision may be deferred pursuant to an agreement which provides
for the installation of a majority of the sidewalks at a given point
in time. The Local Planning Agency may require that all sidewalks be
installed within a development either at a time certain or upon
reaching a certain percentage of build-out of the development.
Section 2. That Chapter Six, "Infrastructure and Public
Property", Article 6.1, "Design Standards and Requirements", Section
6.1.4, "Driveways and Points of Access", Subsection 6.1.4(C),
"Construction Requirements", of the Land Development Regulations of
the City of Delray Beach, Florida, is hereby amended to read as
follows:
Section 6.1.4 Driveways and Points of Access:
(C) Construction Requirements:
(1) Driveways may be constructed of concrete or
asphalt. In addition, the City Enqineer may approve an alternative
surface type includinq, but not limited to, stamped concrete which
creates a noticeable pattern in the finished product. When the
alternative surface is loose rock (i.e. Chatahoochee) and there is a
sidewalk in front of the property, the loose rock shall be limited to
the private property side of the sidewalk (no loose stone in the
right-of-way). If the City has to perform maintenance within the
riqhts-of-way, any displaced stamped concrete will be replaced with a
smooth, non-colored, non-stamped finish. At the discretion of the
City Enqineer, the stamped surface may be replaced with a similar
stamped surface if the additional cost (over and above smooth,
non-colored, non-stamped finish) is borne by the abutting property
owner. Alternative surfaces other than stamped concrete will be
replaced with material at the discretion of the City Enqineer.
(2) Driveways shall include that portion of the
street located between the travelway (traffic lanes) and private
property and said area shall be paved or improved with an alternative
surface as approved by the City Enqineer.
(3) If an alternative driveway surface other than
concrete is selected, the subbase is to comply with standard~
outlined in LDR Section 6.1.2(C).
- 2 - Ord. No. 5-98
(4) Maintenance of concrete, asphalt or alternative
surface driveways constructed within the riqht-of-way is the
responsibility of the abuttinq proDerty owner.
Section 3. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in
conflict herewith be, and the same are hereby repealed.
Section 4. That should any section or provision of this
ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence, or word be
declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a
whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid.
Section 5. That this ordinance shall become effective
immediately upon its passage on second and final reading.
PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final
reading on this the 20th day of January , 1998.
ATTEST:
City tl~k r
First Reading January 6, 1998
Second Reading January 20, 1998
- 3 - Ord. No. 5-98
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
CITY MANAGER~
AGENDA ITEM # IO~- REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 20, 1998
ORDINANCE NO. 5-98 (DRIVEWAY AND SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION
REOUI REMENTS )
JANUARY 16, 1998
This is second reading and a public hearing for Ordinance No. 5-98
which amends LDR Sections 6.1.3(C), "Sidewalk Construction
Requirements", and Section 6.1.4(C), "Driveway Construction
Requirements", to provide for the use of alternative surface types
when approved by the City Engineer. It also adds language that
clarifies what material the City is obligated to replace within
the right-of-way in the event the City has to do maintenance work.
The Planning and Zoning Board considered the text amendments at a
public hearing on December 15, 1997, and voted unanimously to
recommend approval with modified language as to the use of loose
stone on private property only. At first reading on January 6th,
the Commission passed the ordinance by unanimous vote.
The City Engineer has reviewed the proposed ordinance and is
recommending that additional language be added which would allow a
loose rock surface to the edge of pavement when no sidewalk is
present. Section 2 of the ordinance has been amended by modifying
the third sentence under Section 6.1.4(C) (1) to read, "When the
alternative surface is loose rock (i.e. Chatahoochee) and there is
a sidewalk in front of the property, the loose rock shall be
limited to the private property side of the sidewalk (no loose
stone in the right-of-way)."
Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 5-98, as amended, on second
and final reading.
ref:agmemo23
City Of Delray Beach. Department of EnvironmentalServices
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
David T. Harden, City Manager
Randal L. Krejcarek, P.E., City Engineer~
15-Jan-98
Second Reading of
LDR Amendments to Section 6.1.4(C)
Driveway Construction Requirements and
Section 6.1.3(C) Sidewalk Construction Requirements
I have reviewed the proposed LDR changes to Section 6.1.4 (C) Driveways and Points
of Access Construction Requirements and would like to offer additional language.
Section 6.1.4 (C) (1) discusses construction requirements for driveways. The proposed
language states that '~vhen the alternative surface is loose rock (i.e. Chatahoochee) it
shall be limited to private property (no loose stone in the right-of-way)".
This will work when a sidewalk exists across the front of the property in question, but
will be very difficult when no sidewalk is present. Requiring any property owner to stop
one surface type at the right-of-way and change to another surface type will be difficult
to construct, monitor and it will not give a uniform appearance to the property or
driveway. Imagine a house on the island, where no sidewalk exists, having to change
from a loose rock surface to a hard surface at some imaginary line (called the right-of-
way line).
I am proposing that the third sentence in subsection 4.1.6 (C) (1) be modified to allow a
loose rock surface to the edge of pavement when no sidewalk is present. If a sidewalk
exists, or one is constructed across a loose rock driveway, then the driveway approach
apron shall have a concrete or asphalt surface.
Thank you.
cc
Richard Hasko, P.E., Acting Director of Environmental Services
Diane Dominguez, Director of Planning and Zoning
City Manager File
s:L.. VettersVIk~itymgr~dwyconst. mem
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA ITEM ~/~- REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 6, 1998
ORDINANCE NO. 5-98 (DRIVEWAY AND SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION
REQUIREMENTS}
JANUARY 2, 1998
This is first reading for Ordinance No. 5-98 which amends LDR
Sections 6.1.3(C), "Sidewalk Construction Requirements", and
Section 6.1.4(C), "Driveway Construction Requirements", to provide
for the use of alternative surface types when approved by the City
Engineer. It also adds language that clarifies what material the
City is obligated to replace within the right-of-way in the event
the City has to do maintenance work.
The Planning and Zoning Board considered the text amendments at a
public Tearing on December 15, 1997, and voted unanimously to
recommen~el~approval with modified language as to the use of loose
stone on private property only.
Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 5-98 on first reading. If
passed, a public hearing will be scheduled for January 20, 1998.
ref:agmemo23
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DAVID T. HARDEN
CITY MANAGER
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING
PAUL DORLING, P-.RINCIPAL PLANNER
SUBJECT: MEETING OF JANUARY 6, 1998
LDR AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 6.1.4(C) DRIVEWAY
CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS AND SECTION 6.1.3(C)
SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS
The action requested of the Commission is that of approval of LDR changes to
LDR Sections 6.1.4(C) Driveway Construction Requirements and 6.1.3(C)
Sidewalk Construction Requirements relating to alternative surface types for
driveways and sidewalks.
The current wording in the LDR's allows driveways to be constructed of concrete
and asphalt only. Many residential properties currently utilize alternative
surfaces such as paver bricks or stamped concrete. In addition, the Engineering
Division receives regular requests to construct driveways with surfaces other
than currently allowed such as loose Chatahoochee rock.
The proposed amendments would allow the City Engineer at his discretion to
approve alternative surfaces where appropriate. The proposed amendment also
adds language that clarifies what material the City is obligated to replace within
City Commission Documentation
LDR Amendments Relating to Section 6.1.4(C) Driveway Construction Requirements & Section
6.1.3(C) Sidewalk Construction Requirements.
Page 2
the right-of-way in the event the City must do any maintenance work. This
language is required to address the proliferation of stamped concrete surfaces.
Permits for concrete driveways are being issued and individual homeowners are
having contractors "stamp" a pattern in the concrete before it cures. The City is
unable to match the many different stamped designs of driveways that extend
into the right-of-way to the pavement edge. The proposed language will identify
that any portion of driveways located within the rights-of-way that is removed
because of maintenance work will be replaced with a smooth, non-colored, non-
stamped finish. However, if the abutting property owner is willing to bear the
additional costs (over and above replacement with smooth, non-colored, non-
stamped surface) the stamped surface may be replaced with a similar stamped
finish at the discretion of the City Engineer.
The LDR Section 6.1.3(C) dealing with sidewalk construction is also being
amended to clarify the construction requirements for sidewalks at the point they
cross driveways.
The Planning and Zoning Board considered the request at their October 20,
1997 meeting and expressed concerns with the language involving replacing all
stamped surfaces in the right-of-way with non-stamped smooth surfaces. The
Board felt that if the property owner agreed to incur the additional cost an option
to replace the driveway with a similar stamped surface should be available.
Language accomplishing this was added and the Board again considered the
request at their December 15, 1997 meeting. At that meeting the Board
recommended alternative stone surfaces be limited to the private property and
not within the right-of-way driveway aprons due to concerns with spill over into
the street. The Board recommended approval of the LDR amendment as
modified on a unanimous 6-0 vote.
By motion, adopt the LDR changes to Section 6.1.4(C) Driveway Construction
Requirements and Section 6.1.3(C) Sidewalk Construction Requirements.
Attachment:
· Proposed Changes to LDR Sections 6.1.4(C) & 6.1.3(C)
(3)
Sidewalks shall be constructed through asphalt
driveways.
(4) Sidewalks shall be constructed prior to the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the property upon which
they abut. However, installation of sidewalks within a residential
subdivision may be deferred pursuant to an agreement which provides
for the installation of a majority of the sidewalks at a given point
in time. The Local Planning Agency may require that all sidewalks be
installed within a development either at a time certain or upon
reaching a certain percentage of build-out of the development.
Section 2. That Chapter Six, "Infrastructure and Public
Property", Article 6.1, "Design Standards and Requirements", Section
6.1.4, "Driveways and Points of Access", Subsection 6.1.4(C),
"Construction Requirements", of the Land Development Regulations of
the City of Delray Beach, Florida, is hereby amended to read as
follows:
Section 6.1.4 Driveways and Points of Access:
(C) Construction Requirements:
(1) Driveways may be constructed of concrete or
asphalt. In addition, the City Enqineer may approve an alternative
surface type includinq, but not limited to, stamped concrete which
creates a noticeable Datter~min .the ~fi~she~ _x~ro~ct.,~-~ ~Lt~e~ %~.~
alternativ~ surface ~l~.ro~. ~i'.~.~a~a~~~~'~e'
limited t~rivate p~e~n~T~ose stone in the riqHt-of-way). If
the City Has to perform m&intenance within the riqhts-of-way, any
displaced stamped concrete will be replaced with a smooth,
non-colored, non-stamped finish. At the discretion of the City
Enqineer, the stamped surface may be replaced with a similar stamped
surface if the additional cost (over and above smooth, non-colored,
non-stamped finish) is borne by the abuttinq property owner.
Alternative surfaces other than stamped concrete will be replaced
with material at the discretion of the City Enqineer. ~~/~
(2) Driveways shall include that portion of the
street located between the travelway (traffic lanes) and private
property and said area shall be paved or improved with an alternative
surface as approved by the City Enqineer.
(3) If an alternative driveway surface other than
concrete is selected, the subbase is to comply with standards
outlined in LDR Section 6.1.2(C).
- 2 - Ord. No. 5-98
MEETING OF: DECEMBER 15, 1997
AGENDA ITEM:
V.A. LDR AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 6.1.4(C) DRIVEWAY
CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS AND SECTION 6.1.3(C)
SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS (CONTINUED
FROM THE MEETING OF OCTOBER 20, 1997).
The item before the Board is that of making a recommendation on LDR changes to
LDR Sections 6.1.4(C) Driveway Construction Requirements and 6.1.3(C) Sidewalk
Construction Requirements relating to alternative surface types for driveways and
sidewalks.
The current wording in the LDR~s allows driveways to be constructed of concrete and
asphalt only. Many residential properties currently utilize altemative surfaces such as
paver bricks. In addition, the Engineering Division receives regular requests to
construct driveways with surfaces other than currently allowed such as loose
Chatahoochee rock. The proposed amendments would allow the City Engineer at his
discretion to allow alternative surfaces where appropriate.
The proposed amendment also adds language that cladfies what material the City is
obligated to replace within the right-of-way in the event the City must do any
maintenance work. This language is required to address the proliferation of stamped
concrete surfaces. Permits for concrete driveways are being issued and individual
homeowners are having contractors "stamp" a pattern in the concrete before it cures.
The City is unable to match the many different stamped designs of driveways that
extend into the right-of-way to the pavement edge. The proposed language will identify
that any portion of driveways located within the rights-of-way that are removed because
of maintenance work will be replaced with a smooth, non-colored, non-stamped finish.
However, if the abutting property owner is willing to bare the additional costs (over and
above replacement with smooth, non-colored, non-stamped surface) the stamped
surface may be replaced with a similar stamped finish at the discretion of the City
Engineer.
The LDR Section 6.1.3(C) dealing with sidewalk construction has been amended to
clarify the construction requirements for sidewalks at the point they cross driveways.
P&Z Staff Report
LDR Amendments Relating to Section 6.1.4(C) Driveway Construction Requirements & Section 6.1.3(C)
Sidewalk Construction Requirements.
Page 2
Given the existing conditions throughout the City i.e. alternative surfaces which
currently exist, and the number of requests for alternative surfaces it appears
appropriate to allow the City Engineer to approve alternative surfaces on a case by
case basis. Further, as it is not practical for the City to replace all altemative surfaces
either because it is difficult to find a similar match or due to additional expense the
language that replacement will be with a smooth, non-colored, non-stamped finish is
necessary.
1. Continue with direction.
Recommend adoption of the proposed LDR changes to Section 6.1.4(C) Driveway
Construction Requirements and Section 6.1.3(C) Sidewalk Construction
Requirements.
3. Recommend denial of the LDR amendments with reasons stated.
Recommend adoption of the proposed LDR changes to Section 6.1.4(C) Ddveway
Construction Requirements and Section 6.1.3(C) Sidewalk Construction Requirements.
Attachment:
· Proposed Changes to LDR Sections 6.1.4(C) & 6.1.3(C)
S: pla n i/docu meed rive 1 .doc
Section 6.1.3 Sidewalks:
Subsection (C)
Sidewalk construction ,Requirements:
(1) Sidewalks shall be constructed with concrete however, when the sidewalk
is to function both as a pedestrian way and a bicycle pathway it may have concrete or asphalt
as its finished surface.
(2) Concrete sidewalks, which are located in driveways, shall have a
minimum depth of six (6")1 _ ~.v-., .... inches,._(4~-) --I l~"~ -- ~ ~''t II v ~"v 'J'~lll IIVl I --'~'~''' ''~'V--~''''~'*'~'~ ;" drive';;3ys .,~"'
contain #10 x #10 wire mesh, sha!! be p!=ced !,", the c!de';;3!k and shall be constructed of Class I
concrete with a minimum strength of 3,000 p.s.i. ~
(3) Sidewalks shall be constructed through asphalt driveways.
(4) Sidewalks shall be constructed pdor to the issuance of a certificate of
occupancy for the property upon which they abut. However, installation of sidewalks within a
residential subdivision may be deferred pursuant to an agreement which provides for the
installation of a majodty of the sidewalks at a given point in time. The Local Planning Agency
may require that all sidewalks be installed within a development either at a time certain or upon
reaching a certain percentage of build-out of the development.
Section 6.1.4 Driveways and Points of Access:
Subsection (C) Constr~jction Requirements:
(1) Driveways may be constructed of concrete or asphalt. In addition, the
Ci_ty Engineer may approve an alternative surface type including, but not limited to. stamped
concrete which creates a noticeable pattern in the finished product. However. if the City_ has to
perform maintertance within the rights-of-way, the displaced concrete will be replaced with a
smooth, non-colored, non-stamped finish. At the discretion of the Ci_ty Engineer the stamped
surface may be replaced with a similar stamped surface if the additional cost (.over and above
smooth, non-colored, non stamped finish) is borne by the abutting property owner, Alternative
surfaces other than stamped concrete will be replaced with material at the discretion of the Ci_ty
Enaineer. '~ ...... "'-, '"'~' ..... ~'~ ..... "' .... se~ '~ '~'~ ......... *h,, o~,~ ..... ~U o~,~' h,, conc;~t~.
(2) Driveways shall include that portion of the street located between the
travelway (traffic lanes) and private property and said area shall be paved or improved with an
alternative surface as approved by the City_ Engineer.
(3) If an alternative driveway surface other than concrete is selected the
subbase is to comply with standards outlined in LDR Section (~,1 ,;~(¢),
(4) Maintenance of concrete, asphalt, or altemative surface driveways
constructed within the right-of-way is the responsibility_ of the abutting property_ owner.
A fVUBLIC HEARING ~11 be MNI
C~ ~m~ will ~
~ C~ ~ Cih Hill, ~ NW,
~ ~ ~ ~di~. ·
k~ ORDinANCE OF THE CITY C~
MISSION ~ THE CI~ OF DELRAY
BEACH, F~OR~D~ REST&TING
&ND ~ENDI~G ORDINANCE ~,
AND ORDI~NCE 11~ WHICH C~
PRI~E THE ~D (SPECIAL A~IVI.
TIES D~STRICT) ZOniNG ORDI.
NANCE FOR THE WATERFORD
P~CE I DELINT DEVELOPMENT
OF REGIONkL IMPACT
GENERALLY L~TED ON THE
~TH SIDE OF LIXTON IOULE-
YARD, BE~EEN iNTERSTATE ·
AND LINDELL ~OULEVARD;
INCOR~RATING ANY EXISTING
CONDITIONS OF THE WATERFORD
P~CE DELINT ORi ~gTO THE ~D
ZONING DISTRICT; ESTABLiSHiNG
COWD/TIO~S FOR FURTHER DE.
VELOPMENT; PROVIDING A ~V-
lNG C~USE, A GENERAL RE.
~LER C~U~E, AND AN EFFEC*
T~E
AN ORDINANC~ OF THE CITY
~lOg OF THE CI~ OF DELRAY
~EACH, FLORIDa, MODIFYING
THE ~UNITY REDEVELOP.
~NT P~N FOW THE Cl~ OF
~L~Y BEACH; FINDING THAT
THE MODI~ICATI~S CONFORM
TO THE CO~UNITY REDEVELOP,
MENT ACT OF 1~, AS ~ENDED;
FINDING THAT THE MODfFICA.
TION$ ARE ~NSISTENT WITH THE
CITY OF DEL~Y BEACH'S C~
PREHENSIVE P~N, AND
FURTHER FINDINGS PURSUANT
TO ~E APPCI~B~E REGUIRE.
MENT$ OF FLORIDA ~TATUTE$
SECTIO~ )~ (6~ (7); PROVIDING
A GENERAL REPEALER C~USE,
A SAVING C~USE AND AN EFFE¢.
TIVE ~TE.
AN ORDINANCE OF TH~ Ct~
MISS?ON OF THE C[~ ~ DELRAY
BEACH, FLORIDA, ~ENDING
CHAPTER ~, ~RE ~ETY AND
EMERGENCY SERVICE~', OF THE
C~E ~ ORDINANCES ~ THE
CI~ OF DELRAY BE~CH,
~ENDING SECTION
~MERGENCY MEDICAL TRAND
~RTATiON FEES', SUBSEOION
~ (Ah TO REVISE T~E FEE
~HEDULE FOR ~ERGENCY
MEDICAL T~NS~RTATION
ACCOR~NCE WITH THE INF~*
TI~ INDEX CHARGE FOR ~;
PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEAL*
ER C~USE, A ~VING C~USE
A~D AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
AN ~DINANCE OF T~ Ci~ C~
MISS~ ~ THE C~TY OF DEL~Y
B~CH, FLORIDA, ~ENDING SEC*
TIO~ 44.~, "LIGHT I~DUSTRIAL
(LI) DISTRIC~, OF THE ~ND DE*
~LOPMENT REGU~TIONS OF
THE C~TY ~ DELRAY BEACH, ~Y
~ENDING SUBSECTION
~PECIAL DISTRICT REGU~*
TIONS", SUBPARAGRAPH
~H)~3), TO R~DUCE THE MINI-
MUM FLOR AREA ALL,TED
PER TENANT OR BAY; PROVIDING
A GENERAL REPEALER
A ~VING C~USE, AND AN EF-
FE~IVE DATE.
~ ~DINANCE OF THE CI~ ~
M¢~iO~ OF TffE CrTY OF DELRAY
B~CH, FLORID~ ~ENDING SEC*
STRU~ION REGUIREMENT~, AND
~CTI~ 6.1.4(C), ~RIVEWAY C~
STRUCTION REQUIREMENTS*, OF
THE ~ND ~VELOP~NT REG~
~T~S ~ THE CITY ~ ~L~Y
B~CH, TO PROVIDE ~ THE
USE OF ALTERNATIVE SURFACE
~PES FOR DRIVEWAYS AND
~IDEWALKS WHEN MPPROVED BY
THE CITY EffG~NEE~; PROVIDING
A GENERAL REPEALER C~USE,
' 'A ~VtNG C~USE, AND AN
FE~IVE ~TE.
~ ORDINANCE ~ THE C~ C~
MI~I~ OF THE CiTY OF DELRAY
~CH, FL~ID~ ~ENDIHG
~PTER ~, ~ARBAGE AgO
T~, OF THE CODE ~ ORDI*
~NCES OF THE CiTY ~ ~LRAY
~CH, ~Y ~ENDING SECTION
· ~, ~ULK TR~, TO PROVIDE
Boca Raton News, Friday, January?, 199B
CONTINUED
BULK TRASH MAY BE COLLECTED
OW EITHER THE FIRST OR SEC.
OgD REFUSE COLLECTION DAY;
PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE, A
GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE,
AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
AH ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
MI.~ION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY
BEACH, FLORIDA, Fd~ENDING
CHAPTER ~, ~dTILITIES GENER.
ALLY; PUBLIC SERVICE TAX', OF
THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF
THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, BY
AMENDING SECTION ~.lS, 'LEVY
,DF :TAX", AND SECTIOtl
· ECORDS REQUIRED; RIGHT TO
INSPECT', TO COMPLY WITH
CHANGES ~ADE IN THE STATE
LAW REGARDING TAXATION OF
TELECOMMUNICATION SERWCES;
PROViDiNG A SAVING CLAUSE, A
GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE,
AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
P~ be ~dvMd f~ ff i R~I~ ~
Cl~ ~ DELRAY BEACH
C~ C~
~1~: J~ t, ~
~RW~