Loading...
04-09-62 APRIL 9, 1962.- A regula~ meeting of _the: City Council of Delray Bemch was held in the Council Chambers at ~:00 P.M., wi.th MayoP Walter Dletz in the Chair, City Manage~ Louis 'J. Smttzes, City Attorney John Ross Adams and CounciLmen. S1. C. A~e~y~ ~eorge~ Talbot; J~., GeOrge V. ~Wa~en and 1. An open~g praye~ Was delivered by Councthan Avery. 2. 0n motion by ~. Wo~d and seconded by ~. Warren, the minutes of March 26th and 29th, 1962 ~etlngs were un~imously approved. 6.a. City M~ager S~tzes introduced the new Dire'c~or of Finance, ~omas E. Weber, fo~erly';of~ Alton, Illinois, who was selected from fifty ~pplic~ts by a co~ttee from the Civil Service Board, City Auditor4, and. the Ci~ M~ager. 6.b. City M~ager Smitzes presented' a survey report of alleged.nui- sances .existing in violation of Chapter 15 of the City's Code of Ordi- nances that had been f~nishe'd by the Pi~e Department. It was moved by ~. Woodard, seco~ed by ~. ~albot ~d unani- mously carried to direct the City Clerk to co~ly with O~dinance No. G-388 as applicable to this' nuisance 's~vey report. (Copy of nuisance survey report is attached to ~d made a part of the official copy of these ~nutes.) See Page 88H 6.c. The City M~ager i~orm~d the Co,oil that the following bids had been, received concer~g authorized 'i~rovemen~ of that part of S. W. 9th Court lying between 6th ~d 8th Avenues in accordance with city street spec$~ications, And ~eco~ended that award be ~de to the low bidder. SSart Ce~lete B. B. Boldt, Inc'. $3,500;00 Cal. Da~s C$I. Days Hardrives, Inc. $3~8~1.30 10 3~ ~. Avery moved that the award be made to B. B. Boldt, Inc. in the ~oUnt of $3,500.00, the motion 'being seceded by ~, .Warren ~d ~animous ly carried. X. Mayor Dietz asked for a roll call of the .civic org~izations in attendance ~d the n~e of their official representatives, with the following in attend~ce. Chamber of C~eroe J. ~Roy Croft, ~es. League of .Women Voters l~s. Pr~k Carey, Pres. Seagrape Garden Club ~s. J~es Bowen, Rep. Seedling Garden Club }~s. Jo~ Glessner, Rep. Al~anda Garden Club I~s. L. K. Austin, Pres. Delray Beach Elementary P.T.A. ~s. W. E. Case, Pres American Ass~n cT University Women ~s; Lauren C. H~d, Rep. 6.d, Consideration of whether the cl~y. should endorse a proposed resolution ~ the League of M~cipalities for an increase in gasoline and cigarette tax was }abled aS. the !$$~ Co~cil meeting. City M~ager Smitzes stated that Mayer Diet~, ~Vlce'L~aYor Wo0d~d, Counci~ Avery and himse~ had attended a Regional ~eeti~ of the Lea~e at West Pa~ Beach which gave a verbal e~lanatien 0f the data ~ich had been previ. ously submitted, ~d forwarded to ~e CounOi~en; Following co~en~s, ~. Wo~ard moved that the R~a~otubion the League of }~icipalities presented to the Co,oil ~ e~ersed hy the Co~cil, the motion being Seco~ed by 1.~. Talbot. ~ellowi~ co~ents by the CoUnci~en a~ upon call of roll, ~. Talbot ~ ~. Wo~-ard voted in favo~ of the motion, ~. Avery ~d ~. Warren w,r~ oppose~, ~d Mayor Dietz abstained from voting. ~e motion did no.~ n m~oers~p in ~ne Tri~ounty .League, I~..~n :m~,ed ~at this item be tabled fo~ f~theP .consideration. ~e. ~ ~ sec- o~ed by ~. Tal'bot ~d c~ri~ ~animous~. April 9, 1962 6.f. concerning parking on East ~th and 6th Avenues, C%ty Manager Smitzes reported that the following letter had been re~'eived from Mr~ '.?"' Clarence E. Davidson, District Engineer of the Florida State Road Department, in answer to a'-tetter concerning said parking, "In reply to your letter of March 22; I Wish to,advise that the improvement of U. S. 1 through Delray Beach was a. Federal Aid participation Job and as you recall 'themarklngs were changed so that the Bureau of Public Roads would participate in the construction. Therefore, it is impossible to re-stripe the one-way pairs through Delray Beach to provide parking on both sides of the Streets." As a final step toward disposition of this matter, the City Manager recommended that the U. S. Bureau of Public Roads be contacted for con- sideration of relief in this matter. Mr; Woodard moved that the City Manager be instructed to contact the U. S. Bureau of Public R~ads, and indicate $o them the urgency of which the merchants and'~sineaSes a~ong the'~wo highways feel that 'Parking al°~g both.sid'es of the h~i~way be recognized~ the motion being seconded by Mr~ Avery. Mayor Diets' asked if there was anything in the records where property' owner~'gave their'rights,of,waywith the'e~ress.ed.under- standing that there would b~'pArking O~ the'Si'~e whe're"t~ey gave the rights-of-way. Mayor Diets stated ~hat the Chamber.of Commerce had told him that there are things on reco~d to that effect. Upon call of roll the motion carried unanimously. 6..g. City Manager Smibzes reported.'~hat ~2ie .Su.g~ested~'p011cy concern- ing acceptance of Deti~'~gns,1~ ~n ibem' ~hich"wa~ ,~r6ugh~ iuP at. a pre' vious preliminary meeting, was as'~oll6ws: "OniY a taXPayer, or a voter, ~shOuld be able to present a petition to Council. Mayor Dietz stated that in addition ~o that; it be indicated if the ~name is a child or a teenager and the petition to Clearly state if it is a person living outside of Delray Beach~ Following comments., Mr. AVery mo~e~d that Petitions presented to the Council be required tO ShOw a'P~Sons name, ad~'ress and age. Mr. Woodard stated fop clarification: "A petition that is pre- sented to the city ShoUld bear the ~n~ividu~l's name~, addreSs, whether he or she is in or out~bf the 'citY'~'h~iS"~r Her age,' and should be so clearly defined that there is no question in the minds of the Council as to Who the peti~tion' l's being presented ~bY." Uponbeing assured that s~ld ci~ificatio~is correct, Mr. W00~ard~s~C~nded the motion. Following ~isjus~sion~ ~t~h~ motion carried un~imouS~o 6.h. ~Ci~ty M~n~ger Smi. tzes informed the 9ounCil that a proposed reso- lution ~eq~u'~ng a 0'lassifled Post bus,ness area.'~Sub~itted at'~he r~.~t'~'0f.a Councilmanland is in conjunction with recent Chamber of Commerce request to the Post Office Depart'ment'for the~substati0no 'City Clerk Worthing then read RESOLUTION NO. 1396. A'~SOL~r~0~'O~ THE C~TY CO,WOOL OF ~F DELRAY BEACH~ FLORI~A, REQUESTING THE UNITED S~A~ES POS~' O~ICE. OE~ART~T ~0 A'UTHO~ZE ~H~ ESTABLISHmeNT OF A BRANCH OFFICE IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS AREA OF THIS~ ~ITT. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, d~ems it in the best interests of this City to have a Branch Post office located in the ~entral Business Area of the City; and WHEREAS, this determination has been reached after a thorough consideration of~reques~"~or the same from the Board of Directors of the ~el~ BSa~hlEhamb~ 0f ~ommerce, and also various requests from mer~eh~s~o~ted.in"the C$~t~al business area as well as citi- zens from all areas of the City'Who fear that the park~r~ facilities at the. proposed new Post Office will be overtaxed from'l~e commence- ment of operation; -2- ~ ~-9-62 April 9, 1962 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF.DELRAY BEACH, AS FOLLOW~: SECTION 1. The City of~Delray Beach hereby requests the ~United States Post Office to authorize the establishment of a Branch Post Office in the Central Business Area of this City. SECTION 2. The City Manager is.hereby directed to furnish the appropriate postal authorities with a copy of this Res. Qlution to- gether with a letter stating that the favorable consideration of this request would be appreciated, and further would fulfill an urgent need of this City. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, on this the 9th day of April, A. D. 1962. Resolution No. 1396 was unanimously passed and adopted on this first and final reading on motion by ~.~. Woodard. and seconded by ~. Avery. 6.i. Mayor Dietz ~explained that the previous Council passed an Ordi- nance which, they were told, would prohibit flashinglslgns in De]may Beach, but the-verbage was such that someone found a legal loop hole, therefore, there are some flashing signs. Also, since it was the in- tent of the previous Council not to have flashing signs, and since it is the desire of the present Council to no~ permit any more flash- ing signs, Emergency Ordinance No. G-~39 is presented for consider- ation. E~RGENCY ORDINANCE NO. G-439. AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ~OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, PRO- VIDING THAT NO PERMITS SHALL BE ISSUED BY SAID CITY FOR ~HE CONSTRUCTION OR ERECTION OF ANY FLASHING SIGNS WITHIN SAID CITY FOR A PERIOD OF SIXTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE OR UNTIL FURTHER COUNCIL ACTION, WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST. %rHEREAS, the City Council of this City on March 12, 1962 placed Ordinance No. G-435 on first reading; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. G-~3~ was intended to clarif~ Ordinance No. G-374 passed by the City Council of this City oh November ?, 1960 which purportedly prohibited any sign in the City which involves lights flashing on and off; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to study this problem further yet wishes to prohibit any flashing signs until a final deterr~nation is made; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDa: Section 1. No sign which would consis~ of lights flashing on and off shall be permitted to be c~nstructed or erected in this City for a period of sixty d.ays from the effective date of this Ordinance or until further Council action is taken, whichever occurs first. PASSED AND ADOPTED as an Emergency Ordinance this 9th day of April, 1962. Mr. Talbot moved for the passage and adoption of Emergency Ordinance No. G-439, the motion being seconded by Mm. Woodard and unanimously carried. It was noted that in preparation of the perma- nent ordinance the now existing flashing signs would be permitted but additional flashing signs would not be permitted, and that said revised ordinance would be prepared and presented for first reading at the next regular meeting. ?.a. City Manager Smitzes informed the Council that the following letter had been rec. ei~ed from the Beach Taxpayers League, Inc.~ by John A. Thayer, Secre~t,~my, concerning the sewer program~ · April 9, 1962 "Recently the League mailed a letter to Over 500' owners of property East- of the ISland Waterway in which was described the two sewerage plans befng considered by the City of Delray Beach. "A form was inclosed with the letter asking each property owner to vote' on the issue. "The results of the voting were irmpressive in quantity. "A tabulation of the scores of votes received to date shows that the owners of property East of the. Waterway have voted 6. to 1 in favor of the $500,000 system instituted by the City Council of 1961. "We trust that this impressive vote will be dUly considered by the City Council of 1962. Mayor Dietz asked the City Manager to have the Taxpayers League furnish the Chair with an 'exact copy of the letter they mailed out and its enclosure and the. replies that they received, in order that they may be examined and note made with the letter as filed.. Mr. Warren informed the Council that ~r. Thaye~ had called this evening expressing his regret/that.'he could not be present tonight, but that he will' be glad to present the' Council with the letter that wes mailed out and supply the Council with the answers for their perusal. It was moved by Mr. Avery that said letter be received and filed, the motion being secOnded'by Mr. %~oodard and Unanimously.carried. 7.b. City Hanager Smitzes read the following letter from ~r. Quinton G. Minor, President of the Plumosa Parent-T~aChers~Association. "The Plumosa Parent-Teacher Association would like to extend a vote of thanks to the De]ray Beach City CommisSion for its part' in eliminating the flooding condition at Pineridge Road and N. E. Second Avenue, Delray Beach., Florida." Mr. Talbot moved that ~ir. Minor be thanked for his thoughtfulness, the motion being seconded by Mr. Woodard and unanimously carried. 8.a. City Clerk Worthlng read RESOLUTION NO. 1394. RESOLUTION PROVIDING THAT ALL MEETINGS OF ALL BOARDS, ELECTIVE OR APPOINTIVE, LEGISLATIVE OR ADVISORY, SF~LL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC WHENEVER PUBLIC AFFAIRS ARE TO BE DISCUSSED. (copy Of Resolution No. 1394 is attached ~to and m~e-a part of the Official -copy of these minutes.) See 88A & 88B Mr. Avery moved for the adoption of Resolution No. 1394, the motion was seconded by ~'~r. Warren who then mede the following statement: "Mr. Mayor and fellow Councilmen, I have given much study to the resolution presented by Mr. Avery last week and with your in- dulgence would like to. make a statement. "As you know, several times in the past I have asked for meetings to be closed to the press and public. I asked this on matters which I felt were extremely sensitive, and could, if given the · ~ ~ong type Of publicity, JeoPardize the general welfare of our city. "Reflecting-on those times, I felt aft'erwar~ that nothing was gained, and probably much was lost by kee~ing the public in the d ark. "I can remember one specific time in recent months that had the citizenry been kept informed of the plans~ and actions of the ,eounc, i~, much tension could have been avoided. '-4- 4-9-62 April 9, 1962 "I have spoken with city officials in HollyWood, Florida, which has the same resolution. There, according to the officialS, the matter not only~has complete acceptance of the public, but has in no way interfered with the normal function Of the citY,s government. ~ ,. "In our municipal operation, at this time, we have ~very little secrecy, and only one or two boards that hold private meet.ings, I see no reason to continue such actions. "At the meeting wibh the ~lanning and Zoning Board and the Council last week, the press and public .were excluded. There was no rea- son for that; the information gained at that meeting by us, if properly disse~inated to the public, Would have be'an welcomed. "We presently invite the press to most Of our meetings, but I contend that if the press and the public are invited to all board meetings, whether elected or appointed, then they can never accuse us of hiding anythi~g, and the better informed our citizens are, the more sympathetic they will be to the many problems our growing community is facing. "I do nob feel at this time that there~ can be any~ JustifiCation for secret meetings by public officials and urge this board adopt the motion.". 1,~. Avery then commented as follows: "Mr. Mayor~ I made the motion to adopt this resolution because I believe that the time has arrived to recognize the intelligenCe of the tax payers of this city. I understand from the officials in Holly~o0d, from whom I got the resolution, that since they have adopted the resolution they have had absolutely no trouble. I campaigned a year~ ago on the promise of open me'stings in City Hall. For this. matter, to have the far reaching, effect of letting the public know .what we are doing, I be- lieve it is incumbent upon us to once and for all settle, the matter. I lmow that the more recent additions to the Council all express de- sires to have open sessions, and this is .their opportunity to back up their stand. MayOr Dietz, Just this. past weeli., as!ced me to remove this matter from the agenda, l~hen I refused, he -stated that he was going to castigate me. I still refUsed to. cancel my~.intentions that this Council has nothing more, and ~ probably less, to hide than the larger City of Hollywood. Let,s explore Just what this Resolution will do. It Will do away with~ secret meetings of-any board and fully infor~ our populace of the Problems we have. It will not interfere with our Council meetings. It Will not interfere with ~the sessions of the Planning and Zoning Board Or the Civil Service Board. I understand that ~est Palm Beach has completely 0pen meetings of it,s Civil Service Board and there are no problems encountered. Certainly we leave ourselves open for criticism often .enough without retaining a policy of secrecy," Mr. Avery then read an editorial from the Sunday Post-Times con- cerning open meetings and then commented further: "Please remember that this resolution does not interfere with administratiVe~action on any level, but would actually pave .the way for a smootl~er city wide operation if we all l~now that the eyes of the City are on us." Upon call of roll on the motion to adopt Resolution No. 1~94, Avery and Mr. Warren vOted in favor of the' motion and ~iayor Dietz, Mr. Talbot and Mr. WoOdard were opposed. The mbtion did not carry. Mayor Dietz then made the following public statement concerning Resolution No. 1394. "This proposal was not in the public interest. It is' unbusiness like. It is not ~ealistic. It is childish. "Pause a moment p2.~ase--Just thinl~ what it would cost the Delray Taxpayer if every move of acquisition were-Public information. Everyone would scramble to get it firSt befor¥ the City and then the City would be $oat~ed the big price. -5- - 4-~-6~ "Pause another moment please--what a sitting Duck the City would be for the.~Vulture if'legal opinions, given for or against something to the various' co~aittees and boards be- came public information. "This Council as a group have not held any secret meetings. In the communities referred to they were in the habit of holding secret meetings~ Everything has 'been 100% available to the public. 0nly one member of this Council has asked for 'off the record pleaser. Off the record means ti want it secret,, and by some strange turn of events he has spon- Sored this resolution. Does i*. not seem quite inconsistant? "it i~ .high time for the City of De]may Beach to be run in a business,like manner, with carefully thought out programs, executed' logically step by step, not by emotional vacilation- like sea weed floating in and out with the 'waves, or whims, only to spend itself getting nowhere." 8.b. City Clerk Worthing read RESOLUTION NO. 1395. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DEIRAY BEACH, FLORIDA~ ASSESSING COSTS FOR ABATING IU3ISANCES UPON CERTAIN LANDS. LOCATED WITHIN SAID CITY: SETTING OUT ACTUAL COSTS INCURRED BY SAID CITY TO ACCO~LISH SUCH ABATEMENT AND LEVYING THE COST~O~ SUCH ABATEMENT OF SAID NUISA~CES, AND DE- CLARING SAID LEVY TO BE A LIEN UPON SAID PROPERTY 'IN AN AMOUNT AS SHOWN BY REPORT OF THE CITY ~.L~NAGER OF DEI~RAY BEACH, FLORIDA. (copy of Resolution No. 139~ and attached costs is attached to the official copy of these minutes.) See 88C and 88D Resolution No. 1395 was unanimously adopted on motion by Mr. Woodard and seconded by Mr. Talbot. 8.c. City Olerk ~;orthing read ORDINANCE NO. G-$36. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, ANNEXING TO THE CITY OF DELRAY.BEACH CERTAIN LANDS LOCATED IN SECTION. 18, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, WHICH LANDS ~RE CONTIGUOUS TO EXISTING MUNICIPAL LIMITS OF SAID CITY; REDEFINING THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID CITY TO INCLUDE SAID.LANDS; PROVIDING FOR THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF SAID LANDS; AND ~ PROVIDING FOR THE ZONING THEREOF. (Ambrose property) (COpy of Ordinance No. G-436 is attached to and made a part of the official copy of these minutes.) See Pages 88E, 88F, 88G There being no obligations, Ordinance No. G-436 was unamimously passed, and adopted on this second and final reading on motion by Mr. Avery and seconded by Mr. Talbot. Attorney John B. Ambrose who owns the acreage Just annexed was introduced and welcomed into Delray Beach. 8.d. ~ Ordinance No. G-4S? and attached assessmen~ tell were~presented for consideration and public hearing thereon. ORDINANCE NO. G-437. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CIT~ .OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA LEVYING THE ASSESSMENTS AS 8HOWN~SM ~HE ASSESS}~ENT ROLL SUBMITTED BM T~E '~ITY MANAGER OF SAID CITY, CONC ~ERNING THE CONSTRUCTION ~ STOPd~ DRAINS FOR THE AREA ~KNOWN. AS "STORM DRAINA*E SYSTEM - N. E. SECOND STREET OUTFALL", AS SHOWN ON STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM SURVEY FILE T.F. 1868 KK-I, TOGETHER WITH INSTALLATION OF CATCH BASINS, PLaN-HOLES AND AP- PURTENANCES IN CONJUNCTION WITH SUCH STORM DRAINS, SAID ASSESS~NT ROLL BEING ATTACHED HERETO AND FORMING A PART HEREOF. -6' 4-9-62 April 9, 1962 (Copy of 0rdinance No. G-437 and ~l~.~a.~ed assessment roll are attached to and made a part'of the,offlcial copy of the~e minutes) W. E. Case, Lot 2, Block 60; Roy Brady, LOt 18, Block 81 (needs swale cut to drain tl~is); James Carter,~Lot 26, Block 81 (City Manager to look at this); Dorothy A. Newlan, Lot 11, Block 81; A. E. Cason, Lot 1, Block 60 and RichieEnapp, Lots 5 &.13 & pa~t of LoWs 4~6,12 and 14, Block 59, stated that they did not feel~ they were Denefited by this storm drainage system and also objected to the hi~ cost of assessment and the ~% interest ch~ge that would become effective thirty days after billing dat~e. Mr. Chiles Anderson~and ~. Don Shepherd of B~oc~ay, Weber and Brockway, made co~ents and ~e~lanations concerning said~drainage district, design ~d installation thereof, and other general questions. It was also suggested by th~ that legitimate co~laints~of~'the engi- neering or operation of this drainage system be directed to the City Manager outlining ~e problem and Broc~ay, Weber ~d Broc~ay would respond t~ou~ the City M~ager, to give clarification.' ~r. Woodard asked the City Attorney: "Can the Council legally hold the billinE~of'~the~e a~Ssessme~ts during the next two weeks period until Council reconvene~ again in order to ha~e an'opportunity to in- vestigate the period of time inwhich interest would beE$m'0ccurring end ~ount of interest ~d the reason why interest was charged in this ma~er in the past?" ' . Attorney Ad~s replied that the ~ssessment Ordinance had nOt'been passed yet and that there were some charter and ordinance provisions that.may have to be~amended.· ~. Woodard stated ~urther: "If we were to table action ~on this tonight, ~is would .give us a period of time in which we can consider the grievances brou~t before us tonight ~d investigate the interest payment charges~,etc'." ~,~. Dugal G, Ca~bell,'past Counci~aan, called attention to the fact that most of the co~laints of assessment were baSed on the fact that they are getting no benefits, and that is the fault of engineer- ing and not the CoUncil, ~.~. Bob Westerman questioned concerningcredits on the 1951 N. 1st Street Drainage Project where it and the present Project overlap, and satisfactory e~lanation was made. ~. Jo~ Booth and Mr. Har~ McKeen questioned the necessity of this extended sewer system. Following lengthy-discussion, ~. Woodard moved that action On this specific problem be tabled tonight to give a period ofi. tlme in which these co~laints c~ be studied by the Administration, and consequently by Council, ~.~d further co~laints be addressed to She Administration and Engineers for cla~ificati;on~bYthem, and that' the City investigate the period of time ~d the ~o~t of interest~ that has been placed on these assessment's SO that the Co~cil Can come up with a'Iittle clearer situation'perhaps ~wo Weeks from now. Mayor DietZ vacated the Chair and seconded~the motion. - City Clerk Worthing read a letter from Attorneys. Byrd & ~itley protesting against Storm Drainage Assessments for their client Grace Sl~e Weir. Upon call of roll to .table~ this item, the motion carried unani- mously. 8.e. City Clark Worthing read 0~INANCE N0. G-438.' CI~ 0F: DE~AY B~CH TO IN 'SECTION 21, TO,SHIP ~6 ~0~H, ~NGE ~3. ~ST, TO THE CI~ OF 'DE~Y B~CH, F~RIDA. Copy of Ordinance No. G-438 on pag~88-A-i. April 9, 1962 ~Mr. Woodard moved that the last two properties described in Ordi- nance No. G-438 be deleted from said Ordinance, and that Ordinance No. G-438 then be placed on first reading. The motion was seconded by ~r. Talbot and upon call of roll, Mr. Avery~ Mayor Dietz, Mr. Talbot and ~r. Woodard voted in favor of .the motion and Mr..Warren was opposed. 9.a. ~ City Manager Smitzes read the following Planning Board ~eport dated April ?, 1962. "A hearing was held' before the Planning and ZOning Board on March the 30th, six members of the' Board being present, on a request for permissive use for the operation of a day nursery for preschool age children~on Lot 26, Block 10, Del Ida Park, being 710 N. E. 3rd Avenue, Delray Beach, Florida. "At a special meeting on ~April 6th the seven members of the Board present voted unanimously to recommend that. the request be.approved subject to the followi~ng, conditions: 1. That the play yard be confined to the front yard of the house, and 2. That a maximum of 12 children be permitted to enroll." Mr. Woodard .moved ~for acceptance of the Planning Boated Report. Mayor Dietz vacated the.Chair a~d seconded thsmotion which carried unanimously. 'See April 23rd Minu~es, Item 2, age 91 for amendment. 9.a. City Hanager Smitzes read the following P~anning Board Report of March 25, 1962 concerning ultimate boundaries of the City of Delray Beach. "At a special ~eeting on March 22, 1962 the Planning and Zoning Board gave further attention to the matter of the ultimate bound- aries of the City of Delray Beach. The recommendations following .carry forward from my report to you dated January 15, 1962. "1. The Board unanimously approved establishing the extreme westerly line of the city along the Sunshine Parkway. Ail of the proposed future boundaries are shown in red outline on the attached county map. "2. The Board unanimously approved dividing this area into phase one and phase two. The two phases being divided by the green line on the attached map lying approximately 1200 feet West of the ~.~litary Trail. "3. The Board unanimously expressed its desire to have Hr. Georg~ Simons of.fica assist us in asking a careful analysis of phase one. "4. A similar study to be instituted in the phase 2 area when development there begins to take shape. "The Board currently ~has $1250. in its current~dget for outaA~e~services which could~ be applied to this project. "T ~sm meeting Mr, Simons about 8:00 A~M.~ on April 4th~ and will be with him thru~ lunch at ~which time I should be ~ble to determine the scope of the work~ breaking this down into priority projects, determine to some degree the time required, and its approximate cost. "If ~r. Simons can stay thru lunch it would be very nice indeed if the Council could Join. us for lunch, or at least one or two members of the Council so ~hat.we Jet~tXy obtain the Jist of this matter right from the original source." Mr. ~oodard moved .f,p acceptance.of the Planning Board Report. The motion was seconded by Mr. Avery and carried unanimously. 9.a. The city Manager read the f011Ow~i~ng Planning BOard Report dated March 25, 1962. ?8. 4-9-62 April 9, 1962 "At the request of Mayor Dletz I am happy tQ~present~my ideas pertaining primarily to the phase 1 StUdies 'indicated Under (4) in my report of this date on the matter of the uItimate bound- aries of Delray. "The attached report which I made to the members of the Board pretty well outlines what should be done in order to round out a comprehensive Plan.for all the sUrrOunding county areas which we all feel should become a part of our ci'6y~ '~By some ~eans such as this the establishment of a well'in~e- grated and carefully conceived progra~ ~the city should be able to emphasize our purposes and arouse interest in a well conceived city of the future. "Establishment.~f this ~ill require contributinghelp fro~ all of the City department heads as much of the suggested study is beyond the scope of the Planning Board. "If we decide to embark on this program it would be my hope to take advantage of the provisions of the charter and enroll nu- merous volunteer committees to study intensively specific phases. It.is my belief that the ~,~ore citizen participation we can obtain the greater will be the ba~e For sUcCeSS. "The acceptance of a city boundary is the first step in this matter. When these are determined the show is on the road. We are prepared to move Just as fast as we can set up the personnel tO get at it. "Our next Joint meeting with the CounCil On April 9th is most timelY. I am sure that the Board will be prepared to discuss this in detail at that time." This Planning Board RepOrt was unanimously accepted on motion by Mr. Woodard and seconded by ~. Talbot, 9.a. It was pointed out that there are other Planning Board Reports that will be placed on the next agenda for Council action. X. City Manager Smit~es reported~ that there was a need for a new check writing machine, and ibids had been solicited from the only two sources available. The bids received were on a semi-electric machine machine and on a full electric machine.. The City Manager recommended purchase of the full electric machine from F. & E. Check protector CompanY with a net purchase price of $594.00 with the trade in of the existing machine, and ifpurchase is made, funds be provided from the Contingency Fund for this unanticipated expense, it being so moved by ~. Avery. The motion was seconded by Mr. Woodard with the understand. ing that this machine is purchased at the best possible price provided to the City. Mr, Avery accepted this stipulation and the motion car' tied unanimously. X. City Clerk Worthing asked for Council authorization for execu- tion of an agreement prepared by the Florida Inland NaVigation Dis- trict for the City to grant a ~emporary pipe line and beach disposal easement in cornUection with the dredging of the IntracoastalWaterway. This Easement would not be over any private lands butover Thomas Street in the right-of-way and on to the Ocean. It was moved by Mro Avery that authorization be provided for th~ ~ayor to.execute this Agreement. ~*~r. Woodard seconded the motion with the stipulation that all of the residents in'said area be in- formed of the operation so that they are not unaware of the action taken by the City. The amendment was accepted by Mr. Avery and the motion carried unanimously, -9- 4-9-62 April 9, 1962 10.a. City Manager SmitzeS presented bills for approval as follows: General Fund $ 69,881.81 Water Fund - Operating Fund 35,0?0.?9 Sewer Fund ~97,069.4~ 0n motion by ~lr. Aver~ and seconded by Mr. Wooda~d, the bills were unanimously ordered paid. The meeting adjourned at 10:25 P.M. on motion by Mr. Avery. .... Ri. Df... WgRTHING City Clerk APPROVED: MAYOR -10- 4-9-62 RESOLUTION NO. 139~ RESOLUTION PROVIDING TF~AT ALL MEETINGS ,OF ALL BOARDS, ELECTIVE~ OR APPOINTS.ME,' LEGISI~T~VE OR ADVISOaY, S'~A~ ~E OPE~ T~'~ PUBLIC AFFAES ARE TO .B'E DISCUSSED~ WHEREAS, the City Commission of the CITY OF DELHAY BEACH be- lieves that all Boards, elective, or appointive, legisla~ive or visory, as representatives of the people should per, It tb~ publi~ to attend all meetings and that no meetings barling public and pi-ess should be conducted under the guise of convenience to discuss mat- ters of public interest or d~clslons rendered of any kind, relative to public matters; and WHEREAS, the City Cor~llssio~ feels that it is .the. light of the people to know the doings end activities of thelt' elected tires and their appointees, which right is as fundamental as the right of free speech end is one of the maJo~ ,constitutional lights which makes ou~ countl~y a gleat democPacy~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BE~CH: SECTION 1: That this Commission and all of the advisory boards and committees appoin~ed bY the Cit~_Oommission sh~11 conduct all future meetings in open session and ~hat ~he-pless and the public shall be welcome to attend an~ meetings wherein public affaiIs to be discussed, even though final ~o~,~n of such matters to be dis- cussed cannot be taken t~ntil a legulal meeting o= specially called meeting. SECTION Z: That a copy of this Resolution be forwarded to the Legislative Delegation,- the Speaker of the House of Representa~ives, President of the Senat6 of the State o~ Flollda, and that the request the Florida Legisla~ive Dete,Ea~ti6n to amend the Chattel of the ~ITY OF DELRAY BEACH at the next session of the Florida Legis- latume to lequi~e all meetings of the Commission and all boards to be open to the public. SECTION ~,: All ordinances or resolutions ol parts of ordinances or ~esolutions in conflict helewtth be and the ss~e are heleby pealed to the extent of such cor~flict, SE_~TI'ON_._h: This resoluti'on shall..be in force and shall take effect immediately upon~ts pas.sag_e.'an.d a'd~pti0n, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS day Of April,'~--Ig~2, ATTEST: City Clerk (This Resolution did not pass 0n ADril 9, 1962) A RESOLOT~ON OF THE CXT~. COONCIL OF T~E CI~ OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, ~S~S~O C~S ?0~ ~ C~A~N ~ ~ ~m SA~ CI~~' S~TING. o~ ACT~L C~ ~C~ BY ~CI~ T0~AC. CO~L~H T~ C~'~G~ 0P D~Y ~CH, F~RIDA ~ ~S, .~ City O~oil of the $1~ ~ ~l~ay Beaohr ~ and/~ seSSion held Sn the .28~ .A~.: 9. 9ct.. 11..Dec. ,., 1961 & _22. Jan. 1962 de~l~e ~'W~tence-of a nui. s~ce upon ce~ta~ ~o~e o~ p~ceIs of ~d, deeoF~d in a list sub- mitted to t~, f~ wiolat~on of ~ p~ovision~/of City did f~ish each ~ ~e respect'ire ~e~s' of t~ lan~l~ ~sc~ibed in said list.~with a notice ~deSc~ibi~ ~e~ ~t~e of ~e nula~ce ~d that they ~at abate said nuis~e wi~ ~' (30) days, failing in which ~e City Co,oil woul~ have it done,. ~d the c~t thereof would be levied aa an ~aesament aga~at sai~ P~operty; ~d ~, the ~s herei~te~ n~ed did fail .~d neglect to abate the nuiaa~e e~eting upon the~ respective l~s wl~in the time prescribed in said notice ~d ~di~ce G-~7, ~d ~e City of De~ay Beach was required to ~d did ente~ ~.On the follo~ng l~ds and incur costs In abating ~e n~a~ee e~sti~~. ~ecn:as.described in'the aforesaid list; ~d ~S, ~e City ~ager of t~ Ci~ of Del~ay Beach, has, pur- suit to said Ordin~ce G-~7 ~d t~ City Ch~te~ su~tted to City Oo~cil a ~epo~t :of t~.~.cOsts ~red In aBa~i~ the nuisance as ~oresaid, said ~epo~t ~dicati~ ~e coats 9e~ p~cel of i~d involved, NOW, T~0~, ~ IT' ~OL~ ~ THE CI~ CO~CIL OF T 0F DE~ ~oa~ ~mA, AS ~ 1. ~at asseaa~nte ~ ~ individual ~Unts as aho~.by ~e report of ~e City ~ge~ Of ~ City of ~ay Beach, tnvolvi~ ~e CitY's cost of abatl~ the ~esaid nu~a~ea-~on ~e lots ~ p~- cels of l~d deac~ibed ~ said ~eport, a cop2 of ~i~ Is attached hereto ~d ~de a P~t he~e~f~ ~e levied aga~t .the p~oels ~ land descried on said ~epo~t ~d in ~e ~o~ta indicated thePeon. Said assess~nts ac levied a~ll be a lien ~on the ~pectlve Iota and p~ee~ of land described ~ said report, of ~e 's~e nature and to the s~ extent as the lien fo~ general city t~es and shall be collectible In ~ s~ ~er and with the s~e pe~alties ~d ~de~ ~e a~e p~lSions as to sale ~d f~ecloa~e ~a City taxes ~e collectible. 2. ~at the Cl~ Cl~k of said Ci~ shall, as soon as possible ~te~ ~e effective date, ~eco~d a ce~t~ied c~2 ~ ~is resolution in ~ office of t~ C~mk of ~e Ci~ui~ Coat.in ~ fo~ Pa~. Beach Co~ty, Florida, ~d shall fu~ish to each of t~ o~e~s n~d in ~d upon said report a notice ~hat the Ci~ Co~cil of the Oi~ of Delray Beach, did, on the .28. A~.: .~. ~ct.; 11. Dec., 1961 & 22. Jan.. 1962 r ~ abatement ~ a certain nuls~ee e~s{~ on ~he~ described p~operty ~d property o~ ~ving failed to abate such nUXs~ce, within ~e 30 d~ period, ~reupon it was abated by ~e City at costa sh~ in said ~epo~t a~ such asseae~nts shall be legal, Valid ~d bind~g obllgatio~ ~ ~e property a6ai~t which said assess~nts ~e levted~ This ~eaolution Shall beene effective 30 days from date of adoption, ~d the aeses~ents contained.herein shall become due ~d payable ~ty days ~te~ the ~ill~ date of the notice Said assess~nt, ~te~ ~lch lnte~eat ~1 aco~e at the ~ate of per a~ on ~2 ~ald portion t~of' PASS~ A~ ADO~ ~ ~session on /~ ~alter Dietz ...... Cl~7' Cle~k ':-~" .... ~"~ COST OF, ABATING NUISANCES U,,N~,E~. ORDINANCE NO. G-147 ~ROP, ,'F~TY DESCRIPTION 0WNE~ ASSESSMENT Lot 10, Block B, To~i~ Nook Paul S. ~owles $ ~0.00 ~ of ~ of ~ of ~ Of Lot 1, Willle Mae Edwards l~0.O0 Section Lots ~ & 6, Block 7, Romemont Pa~k: ~ A. & Helen 160.00 Barefoot October $~. ~l..lis$ ~ts 1 t~u 6, Block 3, Paul E. Gringle 180.00 Ros~ont Park ~ts 19 t~ 2h,'Biock'3,~ ~ 'Re'so,lone Markey 180.00 Rosemont Park . . ' · Lot 25, Block 1, Atl~tic Pines ~die. a. Adrena ~ner 35.00 Lots 26 a ~7, Block 1, ~2 McEenzie 90.00 Atlantic Pines Lots 13 · ~, Block 10, Katherine a 10.15 OsceOla Pa~k S~,, J;:.Hatche~ 835t of ~t 11 & N35' of ~t 12, BlocE t21 Lot 1, Block 7, Seacrest Park Fed. Title & Ins. Co~p. 5.58 ~t 2, Block 7, Seacrest Park ~o~es & ~rederieE~ Inc; 5.~8 Lot 3, Block 7, Seacrest Park V.K. Ous~an 5.58 Lots 23, 24 & 2~, Las~Ra~as Alice Travnikar 1~;73 Lot~51, DeirayNaner Pa~ine P, B~nw %.58 Del~ay M~or - Ida Lake Te~race..: W?&, of El01' of Sl20' of ~' of ~eo~ge Willi~Archer 8.~4 Lots--168[~'~6%, TrOpic.:Pa~$ Alfred Hill~n 10.~% Lot 2,. S'eaapra2 Estates - Jea~ette H~ Reso~ 5.58 Lot 26,.Delray Isle Ha~ry-~"A~is'Pierson 5.58 to P.0.B .., Lot 26, Ocean Beach Village. ~t 7, Block D, JoaB. Reid's ~redri'c'k'~. Neafie 5,'58 ORDINANCE NO. G-436. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL' OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, ANNEXING TO THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH CERTAIN LANDS LOCATED 'IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, ~,.~ICH LANDS ARE CONTIGUOUS TO EXISTING MUNICIPAL LIMITS OF SAID CITY; REDEFINING THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID CITY TO INCLUDE SAID LANDS; PROVIDING FOR THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF SAID LANDS; AND PROVIDING FOR THE ZONING THEREOF. WHEREAS, John B. Ambrose and Isabelle M. Ambrose (his sister) are the fee simple owners of the property hereinafter described except for that portion consisting of Lake Worth Drainage District Right-Of-Way, and WHEREAS, the said John B. Ambrose and Isabelle M. Ambrose, by their Petition, have consented and given permission for the annex- ation of said property by the City of Delray Beach, and WHEREAS, the Ci%y of.~Delray Beach has heretofore been autho- rized to annex lands in accordance with Section 185.1 of the City Charter of said City granted to it by the State of Florida; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIE OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Delray Beach, Palm ~ea6h County, Florida, hereby annexes to said City the follow- ing described tracts of land located in Palm Beach County, Florida, which lie contiguous to said city, to-wit: Those tracts of land in Section 18, Township ~6 South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida, described as follows: Tracts 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and part of 11 of the Model Land Company's Subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 6., Page 51, containing approximately 53 acres of l~nd m/l; and more particularly described as follows - BEGIN at the intersection of ~the North line of Section 18, Township 46 South, Range 43 East, and a line parallel to and 100.0 feet Westerly from, measured at right angles to the existing physical centerline of Lake Worth 'Drain- age District E-4 Canal, said intersection being the Point of Beginning, and the Northeast corner of here- in described parcel of land; thence Southwesterly a- long a line parallel to and 100.0 feet Westerly from, measured at right angles to the existing centerline of Lake Worth Drainage District E-4 Canal, a distance of 798.60ofeet; thence in a Westerly direction at an angle of 100 -55 -00 , measured from. N. ort. h to,West, to t~he.pre.- ceding course, a distance of 38~.25 fee~; thSnce oou~nermy at right angles to the preceding course a distance of 400.0 feet; thence Easterly at right angles to the preceding course a distance of 288.10 feet more or less to a point; thence South- westerly along said parallel line, said line being 100.0 feet Westerly from, measured at right angles to the existing physical centerline of Lake Worth Drainage District E-4 Canal, a distance of 285.16 feet; thence in a Westerly di- rection, at an angle of 100°-55'-00", measured~ from Not.th to est, to the preceding course a distance of 1~31.37 feeu; thence in a Northerly direction, at an angle of 91°-16,-50",& measured from East to North, to the preceding course a distance,, of 1383.11 feet, more or less to a point in the Nor th line of said Section 18, Township 46 South, Range 43 East, thence Easterly along said North line a distance of 1825.77 feet m~re or leas to the Point of Beginning; said parcel of land contai~ia~ 50.00 acres more or less and being i~Palm Beach County, Flerida; 2. A parcel of land in the~No~hwe, st ~r~er of the North- east ~er of Section 1~, To~s~p ~ ~uth, R~ge ~ East,Pa alm Beach Co~ty, Florida - more p~ticularly described as follows: BEG~ at ~he intersection of a l~ne parallel to ~d 280 feet northerly from, measured at right ~gles to the South l~e of the said No~hwest ~arter of the North- east Quarter, with'a line parallel to ~d 100 feet West- erly from meas~ed at right ~!es to the existing p~- sical centerIine of L~e Worth Drainage District E-~ C~al, said .intersection being ~he point of begi~ing ~d the Southeast corner of the herein described parcel of l~d: thence Westerl~ along said parallel line 280 feet North of the South line of the N~rthwest .Qua~er of the North- east Quarter a distance of 288.10 feet; thence Northerly at right ~gles, a dist~c~ of ~0.00 feet; thence East- erly at right ~gles, a dist~ce of ~65.25 feet to a poin~ in the said parallel line 1~ feet Westerly from the centerline of the E~ C~al; thence ~outherly m~ing ~ ~gle with the preceding co,se 0f 79..'05'-00", as meas~ed from West to South, ~d along said parallel line a dist~ce of ~07.$7 feet more or less to the Point of Begi~ing. T~t part of L~e Worth Drainage District E-~ C~at-as described below: CO~CE at point~ on North Right-Of-W~ line of D~lray West Road (State Roa~ Nc. 806) where said line intersects ~he Westerly Lake Worth Drainage District's E~ C~al~R/W; thence ~ortheasterly along the WestertyR/W line. of ~jd ~ E-4 C~ai.to point of intersection of said Westerl~ R~4 line with the North line of Tract 6 of Model L~d Oomp~ Subdivision as reco~ed in Plat Book 6, Page 51, of the PUbTic Recb~s of~'Paim Beach. Co~ty, Florida; thence East- erly to a p~nt on the North li~e of Trac~ 5 of-Mo~L~d Comp~'s ~bdi~sion in Sect~:lS; To~s~p ~6 So~h, Range ~ East, ~d'refer~ t* ~ereinabove, which ~t in- tersects with She Easterly R~line of said L~e Worth D~Aina~e' District's E,~ C~al; thence Southwesterly along S~id E~sterl~ ~ line 0f sai~-E-~ C~al.to Point ofint'er- section with the'North line of State Road'No. 806 right~ of-~ay; th~nSe SoUthwesterly:along~the N°r~h ~ l~e ~ s~$d State Road No. 806 ~o Point of Begi~ing. SEO~ION...~. That the bo~daries of the Cit~ of Delray Beach, FlOrida,-are hereby redefined-so as ~C include thereinthe above described tracts.~d parcels of land,.~d said l~ds are hereby deCl~ed to Be with~ the 'corporate limits of the Oity'~f Delray Beach, Fl'or~ B$CT~0N 5. That ALL Lands described and identified here- inabove, and shown on Exhibits "l and 2", at- tached to the Petition for ~nexation, shall be zoned in District "R-1AA,, as define~ by existing o~r~inances of the City 6f Delray Beach. ~' SECTION ~. In cp~ideration 'of P~t'itioners consent to an- nexation as abowei.~'e.t forth, and since-municipal services will not accrue~o said land~ until ~such time as development is undertaken ~ completed, said lands--shall not be liable to. ad-valorem .~Xes for a period of five (~) years, from. the date hereof, except' in the' following events and under the following ~l.~umstance : "~ ,.. (~ In the event any parcel Or lot is sold, transferred · or otherwise disposed of, or in the event build- ings.~? S~ctures (except temporary real estate office) are co~strue.t.#d on any parcel or lot,. then such parcel or lot shall be ..suh, je~$ t o normal taxation, including the bonded indebted- nes~ ~$ ~he City of Delray Beach, Florida. In the further event any portion of the lands described upon attached Exhibits "1 and 2'! are p!~tte~ or subdivided, the tax moratorium aforesaid shall re- mash' effective and in full force, .subject to the conditions of~. ~ub-paragraph '(1) above; except, provided when 50% of the l~ts, as shown onlsuch plat or subdivision are sold, such mora- ~Orium shall cease'and terminate as to those platted lots re- maining unsold ~nd thereupon each of the remaining unsold lots, as 'shown upon such. plat, may thereafter be taxed. ~t an annual tax not to exceed $!0..00 per lot for the remaining unexpired portion of said., five (5)' year moratorium. (3) At the expiration of five (5) years from the date hereof, all above described lands, as shown on said Exhibits "l.and 2", shall become subject to normal taxa- tion, including the bonded indebtedness of the City of Delray Beach, Florida. SECTION ~.. That the lands hereinabove described'shall'im- mediately become subject to all of the franchises, privileges, immunities, debts, obligations, liabilities, ordlnances and laws to which lands in the' City of Delray.Beach are now or may be~ except as otherwise provided and set forth in Section ~ above, and persons residing thereon shall be deemed citizens of the C~ty of Delray Beach. .SECTION. 6~ That if any wo~d, phrase, clause, sentence or part of this ordinance shall be declared i~legal by a court of competent Jurisdiction, such record of illegality Shall in no way affect the remaining.portion. This 0rdina~ce. was placed on first reading by the City Council at a regular meeting he~d on March 26, 196.2, and said. Council will eit in the Council Chambers at the City Hall in regular session on ,pril 9~h, 1962, at which time the .above Ordinance will b~ considered and all persons interested shall be given an opportunity to be heard. PASSED in regular session on the second and final reading the 9t~"day of.~pril, 1962, /s/ Wat.ter Dietz MA Y 0 R ATTEST: C~6y Clerk 1st Reading March 26, 1962 2nd Reading April 9th, 1962 · PROPERTIES IN VIOLATION 0P ORDINANCE G-147 AND 0~ER ~DRESS L~, B~OE & Rich~d W. & 711 Shore ~ive ~t 2% 'Block A~a E~ Nelson Boston Beach, F. la, Dell' Park Allan P. ~ 775 S~ridan Road Lot 6', Block 3, Ruth .E. Hend~y Glencoe, 'Illinois Seagate ~tensi0n.' (High growth on E. property line ) M~icipal Paving 57~7 Ogden Avenue Lot 7, 'Block 3, Company Cicero P.O. Seagate Extension Chicago, Illinois (Hl~ growth on-E property l'i~e ) Jo~ B, & 7~ Clubview Drive Lot 27, .Block Lois 8pie~an'~ Irwin, Pa. Seagate. Extension' ~anle H. Robertson Lloyds Harbor Lots.~28,. 29 H~ti~ton, L.I., Block 5, New York Seagate Extension 0c~au.$a M. ~Pont P.O. Box 87 Lots 31 Br~d~ Wilmi~ton 9~, Del. Block 5, · ~agate E~ ension Egbert H, Chap~n 1005 S. Oce~ Blvd. ~ts 33 Delra~ Beach, Fla. Block 5, Seagate Extension ~. J.R. Pedmick 2325 N.E. 28th St; Lot 35, Bloek P~pano Beach, Fla. Seagate Extension Willi~ M.. Miller P.O. B~ 2593 Lots 1 Pompano Beach, Fla. Block. 1,~ Rio Del Rey Shores M.H. · ~e G. 1530 S. 0ce~ Blvd.j Lots 1 Sturtev~t Po~o Beach, Fla. Block 2, Rio Del Rey Shores D~iel F. · 8120 E. Jef'fe~son Av~t 3, Block Ursula B. H~gPave Detroit ~, Mich~an Rio Del Rey Shores Daniel F. · ~030 W, OUter Drive Lot ~, Block Kat~ Hul~ave Detroit 21, Michigan -Hie Del Rey Shores Clyde H. Reeme 1809~ Wa~r~t~ ~. Lots ~ Detroit 21, Hichig~ Block 2, Rio Del Rey Shores E. Jack Barns %70 Banyan Road Lots 7 & 8, ('~fstre~) Block 2, Delray Beach, Fla. Rio Del Rey Shores M.H. & A~e G. ~an East Apts. Lots 1 st~tev~ ~ S. Oce~ ~lvd, Block ~p~o Beach, Fla. Bio Del Rey Sh~res Submitted to the City Council by the City Manager this 9th day of April., 1962. ~ 88-H-1 ORDINANCE NO. G-438 AN ORDINANCE DECLARING THE INTENTION OF THE CiTY OF DELRAY BEACH TO ANNEX CER- TAIN LANDS IN SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, TO THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, it is deemed for the best interest, safety, health, and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, that certain lands be annexed to the City of Delray Beach; and WHEREAS, said tract of land is contiguous to the pre- sent boundary of territorial limits of the city and that, when annexed, it will constitute a reasonably compact addition to the incorporated territory with which it is combined; and WHEREAS, there are less than ten (10) registered electors contained in the area which is to be annexed; now~ therefore BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA: (1) That is accordance with Section 171.04 of the Florida Statutes (1961), upon the expiration of 30 days from the final passage of this ordinance, the City of Delray Beach shall by ordinance annex the following described lands, making them a part of the corporate limits of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, all of said lands being in Section 21, Township 46 South, Range 43 East: S10~ of N3180' lying bet State Rd AIA & the waters of the Atlantic Ocean SlO0' of N640' of Gov Lot 4 E of St Rd S150' of N790~ of Gov Lot ~E of St Rd (~). That this Ordinance shall be published in full once a week for four consecutive weeks, in the Delray Beach News- Journal. (3) Qualified objectors may object to such annexation within the time and in the manner provided by said Section 171.0~ of the Florida Statutes (1961). (4) Should any section, clause or provision of this Ordinance be declared by a C~urt of Competent Jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any part thereof, other than that part so declared to be invalid. PASSED AND ADOPTED this the day of 196~o MAY OR ATTEST: City Clerk First Reading April 9, 1962. ........ ~tion of April 9th, 1962 in placing said Second.Reading ordinance on first reading, was rescinded on May 1st, 1962. ORDINANCE NO. G-437 FLORIDA LEVYING THE ASSESSMENTS AS SHOWN BY THE ASSESSMENT .ROLL SUBMITTED. BY THE CITY MANAGER OF SAID CITY, CONCERNING THE CONSTRUCTION OF STORM DRAINS FOR THE AREA KNOWN AS "STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM - N.E. SECOND STREET OUTFALL", AS SHOWN ON STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM SURVEY FILE T.F.1868 KK-I, TOGETHER WITH INSTALLATION OF CATCH BASINS, MAN-HOLES AND APPURTENANCES IN CONJUNCTION .k~ WITH SUCH STORM DRAINS, SAID ASSESSMENT · '~ ROLL BEING ATTACHED HERETO AND FORMING A /~ PART HER~0F. ~ WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of Delray Beach, Florida has,'in pursuance to the Charter of said City, submitted to the City Council for approval, a report of the costs and the assessment roll for the~ construction of storm drains for the area. kno~m as "Storm Drainage System - N.E. Second Street 0utfall", as shown on storm ~drainage system survey file T.~.1868 KK'I, together with installs- tion of catch basins, man-holes and appurtenances in conjunction with such storm drains, and WHEREAS, said report and assessment roll were approved by the City Council in regular session on the 26th day of March, 1962, and WHEREAS, due notice concerning ea~ assessment roll was given by advertisement, by the City Clerk, in accordance with the City Charter of said City, for the purpose of hearing objections to said assessment roll, ~HEREAS, no sufficient objections were received to the confirma- tion of said assessment roll~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, as follows: SECTION 1. The assessments, as shown by said assessment roll which is annexed hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby levied against the properties shown and in the amounbs stated on said as- sessment roll~ said assessments to be paid in three equal annual installments, together with interest at the rate of 8% per annum, the first installment becoming due and payable on and on the for the next ensuing two years~ and said special assessments, so levied, shall be a lien from the date the assessments become effective, upon the respective lots and parcels of land described in said assessment roll, of the same nature and to the same extent as the liens for general City taxes, and shall be collectible in the same manner and with the same penal- ties and under the same provisions as to sale and forfei.tur.e as City ~axes are collectible. PASSED in Regular Session on second and final reading on this the ' 'MAYOR ATTEST 1st Reading ~arch 26, 1762 2nd Reading _~ .... ~'sS~.,s~..? ROLL Construction of Storm Drains for the area known as "STORM DRAIN- AGE SYSTEM - N. E. SECOND STREET ODVfFALL'' as shown on Storm Drain- age System Survey Pile T.F. 1868 KK-1, together with installation of catch basins, man-holes and appurtenances in conjunction with such storm drains~ Assessment per Benefited Square Pt. - .... $ ,0590522 Total Area Description benefited Total of .Prop~rt2. OwDer_ _~C. Ft. Ass,re. Block Lot 50 1 thru 24. City of Delray Beach 165,974 $9,801.13 51 1 & 9 thru 16. City of Delray Beach 93,360 5,513.11 '52 7,8 & 9 and W} of 10 & 11. City of Delray Beach 40,517 2,392.62 58 S} of~ 10. 'V.R. & Frances Ledbetter 3,277 193.51 58 11 & 12. W.H. & Alice Deaderick 13,896 820.59 58 13 & Eh of 14. Lee Realty Company 10,422 615.44 59 N 75' of 1. Alex F. & Beatrice Wilson 9,870 582.85 59 S 1.5, of 1 & N 73.5' of 2. Floi~ence M. Condon, Sr. 9,870 582.85 59 S 3' of 2 & Victor A. & N 72' of 3. Martha M. DeClercq 9,870 582,85 59 N 70.5' of 4. Emma Harris 9,2?7 54?.82 59 S 6, of 4, all of Richie P. & Vivine G. 5,& N 1.25' of 6. Knapp 11,021 650.81 59 s 59.25' of N 6o.5, of 6. Lila Burkholder 7,797 460.43 59 S 15.7' of 6 & N Arthur C. & Jennie 50.8' of 7, less S M. Osgood 8,488 501.24 4' of E 65.8' thereof. 59 S 28' of 7 less N William C. & Susan 2' of W 6~.8, there- Ann Hill 13,712 809.?2 of & ell of 8. 59 N 75' of 9. Alex F. & Beatrice Wilson 9,8?0 582.85 59 S t.5' of 9 & N Arthur W. & Marion K. 73.5' of 10. Yarnell 9,870 582.85 59 S 3' of 10 & Arthur W. & N ?2' of 11. Agnes S. Gore. 9,8?0 582.85 59 s 4.5' of 11 & N 70.5' of 12. Stephen Boyko 9,870 59 S 6' of 12, all of Richie P, & Vivine G. 13 &'N 1.25' of 14. Enapp. 11,021 650.81 59 S 60, of N 61.25' of 14. Llla Burkholder 7,896 466.27 59 s 15.7, of1314.& N 48.8' of Della M. Bonnette 8,488 501.24 59 S 27.25' of 15 & James V. & Frances C. N 21.50' of 16. Pignato 6,415_ 378.82 59 16, less N 21.50' Georgia B. Olark 7,235 427.42 60 1. A.E. Oason 9,830 580.48 60 E~ of 2. W.E. & Juanita O. Csse 4,915 290.24 60 .7. Virginia L. Ca,on 9,830 580.~8 60 8. Helen Farrow Long 9,830 580 60 9 · E} of ~ 49.7' of 10. J.L. Love 13,100 773.58 60 E~ .of S 25.3~ of 10 .... · & E~ of N 24.7' of 11. Beulah S. Wainscott 3,290 194~2§ 60 E~ of S 50' of 11. Velma B. Bradshaw 3,290 194.28 65 N 15' of 12. Maisie E. Buerk 1,965 116.04 65 13 &1614'and Ada Douglass 13,964 824.60 6515 & Theodo~r&'H~ ~& N 15' of 17. Elm_ina Popp 16,086 949.91 Page 2. Storm Drainage System A.SSESSMENT ROLL N.E. 2nd St. Block Lot Owner Sa. Ft.~ Ass 'm. ~ 66 Eh of 6. ~. & Lucile ~i. Evans 66~ of 7 & E~ of 8. Herman C. Fray 4,912 290.06 66 of N 25' of 10. J.L. & Lucile M. Matthews 819 48.36 66 of S 25' of 10 & Marland W. & Elinore B. of ll. Zimmerman 4,094 241.76 66 E 3/4 of 12 & N Arnold F. & Fredericka 25' of 13. Van Pelt 8,187 483.46 66 S 25' of 13, all of l~ & N 25' of 15. W.W. & Anne W. Miller 13,100 ~ ?73.58 66 16 & S 25' of 15. C. 0. & Mary O. Friberg 9,825~ ~580~19 66 19. C.H. Lander 7,500 442.89 66 20. C.H. Lander 9,350 ~ 552.14 66 Eh of S 200'. Mary Elizabeth Smith 27,800 1,641.65 66 N 50' of S 200' of W~. The Love Company 6,950 410.41 66 W 100' of S 50' of N 150' Tena & William Becket 5'000 295.26 67 1. Alice L. Brock & Edith A. Wahnsiedler 10,021 5~1.76 67 2. Margaret Skaehill 10,021 591.76 67 3. Frank A. Brucker 10.021 591.76 67 ~ Adeline Graham 10,021 591.76 67 44.5' of 5. Otto & J.F. Schwartz ~5;829 344.22 67 S 31.9' of 5 & J.C. Ives, Mary K. Murray, all of 6. Joanna C. Hubbard, Martha C Wilson, A. E. Cason & Robert L. Kendall. 14,200 838.54 67 7 & 8. J.C. Ives, Mary K. MUrray, Joanna C. Hubbard, Martha C. Wilson, A. E. Cason & Robert L. Kendall. 20,043 1,183.58 67 9 & N 26.5' of 10. Trieste Construction Co. 13,492 796.73 67 S 50' of 10. Albert V. & Gracie Lee DeClercq 6,550 386.79 67 11 Dorothy A. Anderson 10,021 591.76 67 12 · Judith E. Anderson 10,021 591.76 67 13 Grace MacNeely 10,021 591.76 67 14 Emma F. Moore 10,021 591.76 67 N65, of 15. 0rlo J. Billings 8,515 502.83 67 16 & S ll.5' of 15. Irene Moore 11,528 680. 75 73 N 15' of Block City of Delray Beach 3,978 234.91 ?3 S 128.5' of N 143.5' of Block less W 3/4 W-L-A-K Realty Compsny 50,530 2,983.91 of N 22' of Lot 3; also Lot 22 & N~ of 21. 73 Eh of S 36' of 3; Eh of 4,5,6,7, 8 & 9; E 3/4 of l0 & ll; 12 thru 20 and B 29' of 21. W.R. Haggart 100,472 5,93 3.09 74 I Archie Adams ~. 7,425 .438.46 ?.4 2 & N 6' of 3. R.C. Keen 7,425. 438.46 74 S 44' of 3 & N 11.5' of 4, Margaret M. Brault 7,359 434.57 74 S 38.5' of 4 & N 17' of 5. Harry Morgan 7,359 434.57 ?4 S 33' of 5 & N 22.5' Ray F. &.Alpha B. of 6. Browning ?, 359 434.57 74 S 27~.5' of 6 & N 28' John B. & Irma J. of 7. Sraith 7,359 ' 434.57 74 S 22' of 7 & N 33.5' of 8. 0. T. Thames ?,359 434.57 74 S 16.5' of 8 & N 39' HoWard G. & Elsie M. of 9. Wharton 7,359 434.57 74 S 11' of 9 & N 44.5' of 10. Merlin S. Temple 7,359 434.57 74 11 & S 5.5' of 10. Virginia K. Jones 7,359 43~.57 74 12 I~abelle Smock Thames 7,425 438.46 Page 3. Storm Drainage SyStem ~.S. SESSMENT ROLL N. E. 2nd St. _B10~k Lpt 0w~. er Sq.~ Ft. AsS,re. 7~ 15 ~ S 6.25' of 16. Edward A. & Rosamond H. Robbins 7,458 ~0.41 74 N 43.75' of 16 & S 12.5' of 17. Dorothy M. ~eeler 7,458 ~0.41 75 N 37.5' of 17; all of Edward E. a Ve~a H. Ekvall 18, 19 & 20 & S 37.5' & David H. E~all, Trustee of 21. 29,835 l, 761182 ~4 22 & N 12.5' of 21. Louise Cox Earle 8,287 489.~ 75~ 23 King S. Cone 6,630 391.52 24 Richard T. Jebb ~,425 438.46 75 1 & N 41' of 2. Carl R. Bro~ ~15,862 936.69 75 s 35.5' o2 2 & w~ o2 N 20.5' of 3. R.W. Ward 6,175 364.64 75 ~ of S 56' of 3. Grace H. Nickell 3,780 223.21 ~5 ~ of N 57.4' of 4- A. & Marion Y~nell 3,874 228.77 75 ,z of S 19.1' of 4 & of N 38.2~' of 5. Maria~e R~son 3,871 228.59 75 of s 38.25, o~ 5 ~ of 6. Virginia Kearns 7,~5 439.64 75 of 7. Priest Land Co., Inc. 75 9 C. & Juanita Boat~ight 10,327 609.83 75 N 51' of 10. C..& Juanita Boatwri~t 6,885 406.57 75 S 25.5' of 10 & N Walter A. & Ida L. 38.2~' of ll. Roth 8,539 504.25 76 WA of 2. George A. ~ H~ey 4,668 2~5.65 76 ~$ of 3,~,5 & 6. Delray Lumber Co. 18,672 1,102.62 81 i a 2. Julia Lawson Ad~s ~,084 831.69 81 3 & 4. J.L.& Marg~et Patterson & H. B. & Dorothy K. Ad~ 13,510 797.80 81 ~ J.L. & M~g~et PattePson 6,755 398.90 81 6 & 7. Lola H. Wenderoth 13,510 797.80 81 8 Barbara E. Dodge 6,755 398.90 81 9 Marie H. St~ombeck 6,755 398.90 81 l0 D.C.Jr. R ~uise Mitchell 6,755 398.90 81 11 Dorothy A. Newlan 6,755 39~.90 81 12 Dorothy P. Baker 6,755 39~.90 81 13 Dorothy A. P. Baker 6,755 398~90 81 ~ Harry P. McKe~ 7,328 ~3~.73 81 15 & 16. Milton J. Strong 14,168 83o.65 81 17 Jo~ B. S~th, Har~ A. Kahler, Jr. & Joseph M. Buehler 6,755 39 8.90 81 18 Roy O. & Doris L. B~ady 6,75~ 398.90 81 19 Ida T. ~eeler 6,7~5 398.90 81 20 & S~ of 21. Joseph H. Gu~e~an 10,132 598. 31 81 22 &N~ of 21. J.W. & ~ily Henderson 10,132 598. 31 81 23 Har~ & Genevieve Grady 6,755 398.90 81 2~ Harry & Genevieve Grady 6,7~5 398.90 81 25 Harry R Genevieve ~ady 6,755 39 8.90 81 26 J.A.R.& Elizabeth Carter 6',755 398.90 81 W 50' of 27 a 28. Richard J. ~ite, Jr. 5,212 ~07.78 81 27'& 28 less W ~0'. Richard J. ~ite, Jr. 8,9~6 ~28.87 82 1 thru 12. Booth Westerman, Inc. 82,681 4,88~.~9 82 13 & ~. D.D. Cary 13,510 797.80 82 15 Raymond E. & Vimginia A. Metzler 6,755 398.90 82 16 & 17. Louise Roe VanTreese 13,510 797.80 8~ 18 t~u 23. D.D. Cary ~0,530 2,393.39 82 W 5~.6%' of N 58' of Jo~ E. & Fidelis M. 2~, LaLo~d~ 3,169 187.14 82 24 less W 54.65' of Roy A. & Doris L. N 58'. Brady ~ 5,207 307.48 Page 4. Stoma Drainage System~ ASSE~..SMEN.T ROLL, N. E. 2nd St. B~10ck ,Lot Owner ~ Sq. Ft. Ass'.m.. 83 I & N 18.5' of 2, less Paul & Dorothy E. an irregular strip. Myers 12,507 $ 738.57 83 S 20' of N 38.5' of 2 Helen L. Myers plus an irregular strlp & less an " " 2,700 159.44 83 N 18.8' of S 38' of 2, J. L. Croft plus an irreg, strip. 2,856 168.65 83 S 19.2' of 2. Clayton G. Hale 2,592 153.06 83 N 34' of 3. Paul.& Dorothy E. Myers 4,590 271.05 83 N 33.7' of S 42.5' of 3. Howard & Ruth Smith 4,549 268.63 83 S 8.8' of 3 & N 26.35' ~ of 4. Paul & Dorothy E. Myers 4,749 280.4~ 83 S 11.90' of N~ of 4. J.C.& Hildreth Williamson 1,606 94.84 83 9 & 10. Southeastern Public Service Company 20,655 1,219.72 83 11 & 12. Florida Power & Light Co.20,655 1,219.72 83 ~3 Delwinn, Inc. 10,327 609.83 83NE~ of 14&E~ of of 15. Delwinn, Inc. 7,745 457.36 89 1 & 2. Raymond Bite 5,701 336.66 89 3 Clayton G. Hale 2,850 168.30 89 4 & 5. James J.&.Betty A.Priest 5,701 336.66 89 6 Seacrest Shops, Inc. 2,850 168.30 89 7 W.S. Ransdell 2,850 168.30 89 8 & 9. Seacrest Shops, Inc. 5,676 335.18 89 10 Jean G. Pyle 2,833 167.29 89 11 James B.& Gladys O'Keefe 2,830 167.12 89 12, 13 & 14. Joseph J. Quinn 8,~82 500.88 89 15 Joseph J. Quinn ' 2,~26 166.88 89 16 & 17. A.J.& Mabel J. Michael 5,372 317.23 89 18 th~u 28. Max & Alma-K. Woehle 83,278 4,917.75 89 29 th~u 37. Seacrest Shops, Inc. 30,600 1,807.00 89 38,~39,40 & N 9.65' of ~1. James I. Sinks 10,158 59'9.85 89 S 15.35' of 41 & all of 42,43 & 44. Sher~nan D. Clough 9,072 535.?2 90 1 thru 8 West of RR. Sherman D. Clough 30,282 1,788.22 90 9 & t0 West of RR. E.J.& Anette M. Turk 6,300 372.03 90 11 & 12 West of RR. Willard M. Waters 5,875 346.93 90 13 & 14 West of RR. Willard M. Waters 5' 475323.31 90 15 & 16 West of RR. Willard M. Waters 5,075 299.69 90 17 & 18 West of RR. Willard M. Waters 4,665 275.4R 90 19 thru 24 West of RR.South Florida Asphalt Co.13,846 817.64 91 N 153' of triang. Southeastern Public strip bet. Block Service Company 7,344 433.68 83 & Railroad. 91 S 76.5' of N 229.5' Florida Power & Light Co. of triang, strip bet. Block 83 & Railroad. 2,295 135.53 91 S 151.5' of trian~. Stanley Benjamin strip bet. Block 83 & Railroad. 1,818 107.36 Del Ida Park Blk. LOt'. 6 I Evelyn Fountain 7,292 430.61 6 2 J.Ro& Evelyn Fountain 7,500 4~2.89 6 3 Melville & Susan B.BroWn 7,500 442.89 6 4~ S. KamikamLl 7,292 430.61 6 ~,6 & 7. Allan E.& Eula N. Brauch 18,000 1,062.94 6 8 Frances Turner 6,000 354.31 6 9 D.H. Turner 6,000 354,31 Page 5. Storm Dr. ainage System. ASSESS ._Mb~NT_~ROLL~ N. E. 2nd St. Property Des.c. riDtion Owne~ Sq. Ft. Ass,m. Del Ida Park 6 10 & 11 Fred J. Powell, Eleanor P.Oase & Louise P.Burke 12,000 708,62 6 12 & 13 Helen Edwards 15,032 887.67 6 14 l~iari e Petrucci 7,620 449.98 6 15 Nils & Margit T.Pearson 7,412 437.&9 6 16 01ympio & Victoria Bosco 6,000 35~.31 6 17 thru 22. Jol~n E. & R. W. Massie & M_rs. D.D. Whittinghill 36,000 2,125.88 De~l. id~ Park Blk ~ ~ ' ~ot'. 7 1 Charles & Lena Zuckerman 6,092 359.75 7 2 Charles Zuckerman 6,300 372.03 ? 3 L.M. Taggert 6,300 3?2.03 7 4 L.M. Taggert 6,092 359.75 7 5 C.J.& Louise Y. Manson 6,000 354.31 7 6 thru 10 O.J. Manson 35,962 2,123.64 ? 11 & 12 less W 10' S.G.& Helen L.Roddick 12,622 745.36 7 13 & W 10' of H.F. Fred & Barbara 11 & 12. K. Mueller 7,200 425.18 7 ~ Helm. O. Rohl ~..000 354.31 7 , 16 & 17. Charles Zuckerman 1 000 1,062..95 Del Ida Park Sl~. ~'t"."' 13 1 & 2, E.J. Warner 11,792 696.34 13 3 & 4. L.W. Smith 12,000 ?08.63 13 5 John J. Mezoff 6,000 354.31 Section 8~h6-h3. E 123' of S 100' of E~ of Lot 12 less E 33' R/W. A. Grace Slane Weir 9,000 531.47 E 125' of N 150' of S 250' of E~ of Lot 12 less E 3.3' R~4. A. Grace Slane Weir 13,500 797.20 E 125' of N 210' of S 460' of E~ of LOt 12 less E 33' R/W. A Grace Slane Wei~ 18,900 1,116.08 E 125' of S 100' of N 200' of E~ of Lot 12 less W 300' .& less E 33' R/~. ~lice Galloway 9,000 531.47 E 123' of N 100' of E~ of Lot 12, less E 33' R/~. ' K.M. Davis 9,000 531.47 E 123' of S 37.5' of E 307.09' of Lot 11 less - E 33' R/W. Ruth S. Albright 3,375 199.30 Florfda East Coast Railroad R/W bound on the East by the center line of said R/WJ' 'on the North by the easterly extension of the North line of Lot Block 13, Del Ida Park; .on the west by the westerly line of' said R/~ and on the South by the easterly extension ofthe east-west centerline of Lot 15, Block 83. 112,268 6,629.67 Belvedere Const. Co. $158,506.29 2, ~1,62~ ~143,002.28* Brockway, Weber & Brocks;ay 14,955.36 Flor'ida East Coast RR. 4,961.61 Delray-Beach News-Journal 171.05 Recording Res. No~ 1316 · 13.75 Assessment Roll (est) t38.60 Ordinance Levying Costs (es~) $178,752. ~6 Less 20% 35,750.~8 City's share of Cost Per Res. No. 1316. · 80% to be ASSESSED '¥~3,~O2. 28- 464 8,9 APRIL 12, 1962. A Special Meeting was held in the Council Chambers at 7:00 P.M., with Mayor Walter Dietz in the Chair, City Manager Louis J. Smibzes, City Attorney John Ross Adams and Councilmen A1 C. Avery, George Talbot, Jr., George V. Warren and Oliver W. Woodard, Jr., being present. An opening prayer was delivered by Councilman Avery. Mayor Dietz called the meeting to order announcing that same had been called for the purpose of appointing a Fiscal Agent in connection with the proposed outfall sewer system. Mayor Dietz stated that the council had met with the three recommended Fiscal Agents who had submitted proposals. ~. Avery moved that B. J. Van Ingen & Co, Inc., be appointed the Fiscal Agent for the City for this project, and that the Mayor be authorized to enter into a contract pursuant to their proposal. The motion was seconded bY Mr. War~en and. carried una~imously. See Page 91, item 2 for. a~amdment (April 23rd Minutes). Mr. Woodard stated' that the outfall program as now outlined, elim-tna$i~E the front foot assessments, has his full support and he thinks it is a very fine progr~l. The Meeting adjourned at 7:15 P.M. on motion of ~. Talbot. R. Dr WORTHING City Clerk APPROVED: