Loading...
41-92 ORDINANCE NO. 41-92 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER FOUR, "ZONING REGULATIONS", SECTION 4.6.15, "SWIMMING POOL, WHIRLPOOLS, AND SPAS", OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING SUBSECTION 4.6.15(G), "YARD ENCROACHMENT", TO ALLOW SWIMMING POOLS TO BE LOCATED TO WITHIN FIVE FEET OF A REAR OR SIDE PROPERTY LINE, WHEN SUCH PROPERTY LINE IS ADJACENT TO AT LEAST 50 FEET OF OPEN SPACE, AND TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM STREET SIDE SETBACK REQUIRED FOR SWIMMING POOLS FROM 15 FEET TO 10 FEET; PROVIDING A SAVINGCLAUSE; PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Chapter Four, "Zoning Regulations", Section 4.6.15, "Swimming Pool, Whirlpools, and Spas", Subsection 4.6.15(G), "Yard Encroachment", of the Land Development Regulations of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, be, and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: (G) Yard Encroachment: (1) Swimming pools, the tops of which are no higher than grade level, may extend into the rear or side setback area but to no closer than ten feet (10') to any ~//~//~ property line, ~/~/~/f~f~/f~/~I~;~/~/~/~ ~f~W~ , except as provided in division (2) below. (2) When adjacent to at least 50 feet of open space, as defined in Section 4.3.4(H) (5) (c) and (d), swimming pools at ~rade level may extend into the rear or side setback area but to no closer than five feet (5'). (3) Although swimming pools may extend into side and rear setback areas, a screened or other porch enclosure shall not be permitted to encroach into such setback areas, except as provided in Section 4.3.4(H) (5) (b). Section 2. That should any section or provision of this ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence or word be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. Section 3. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances which are in conflict herewith be, and the same are hereby repealed. Section 4. That this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon passage on second and final reading. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final reading on this the 8th day of Sa~tember , 1992. ATTEST: .... ~ity ~Cl~rk ' ! First Reading August 25, 1992 Second Reading September 8, 1992 MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGER~ SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM ~/~ P - MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 8. 1992 QRDINANCE NO. 41-92 DATE: September 4, 1992 This is the second reading of an ordinance amending the Subsection 4.6.15(G) "Yard Encroachment" of the Land Development Regulations to allow swimming pools to be located to within five feet of a rear or side yard, when such property line is adjacent to at least 50 feet of open space, and to reduce the minimum street side setback required for swimming pools from 15 feet to 10 feet. This text amendment was initiated at the request of the developers of the Clearbrook residential community, who are seeking additional flexibility in the placement of swimming pools on lots which are adjacent to a Lake Worth Drainage District canal. Currently the LDRs allow screen enclosures for swimming pools to have a zero setback when the property line abuts at least 50 feet of open space. However, that provision does not extend to unscreened swimming pools. The proposed standards are consistent with those of neighboring municipalities, and will provide some additional flexibility in situations where adjacent property owners will not be adversely affected. The Planning and Zoning Board at their August 17th meeting recommended approval of the text amendment. A detailed staff report is attached as backup material for this item. Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 41-92 on second and final reading. CITY COMMISSION DOCUMENTATION TO: /--D~.yID T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER THRU:~ ' ~ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: MEETING OF AUGUST 25, 1992 PROPOSED LDR TEXT AMENDMENT; SECTION 4.6.15(G~ SETBACKS FOR SWIMMING POOLS ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION: The action~requested of the City Commission is that of approval of 4~ext amendment which would allow swimming pools to be located to within five feet of a rear or side property line, when such property line is adjacent to at least 50 feet of open space; and which would reduce the minimum street side setback required for swimming pools from 15 feet to 10 feet. BACKGROUND: This text amendment was initiated at the request of the developers of the Clearbrook residential community, who are seeking additional flexibility in the placement of swimming pools on lots which are adjacent to a Lake Worth Drainage District canal. Currently the LDRs allow screen enclosures for swimming pools to have a zero setback when the property line abuts at least 50 feet of open space (canals, lakes, golf courses, etc.). However, there is no similar provision which applies to the setback for the swimming pools themselves. This amendment would allow grade level swimming pools to be within 5 feet of a rear or side setback when similar open space conditions apply. It would also reduce the setbacks along street side property lines from the current 15 foot minimum to 10 feet. These standards are consistent with those of neighboring municipalities, and will provide some additional flexibility in situations where adjacent property owners will not be adversely affected. City Commission Documentation LDR Text Amendment Re: Swimming Pool Setbacks Page 2 PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION: The Planning and Zoning Board formally reviewed this item at its meeting of August 17, 1992, and recommended that the amendment be adopted. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, approve the amendment to LDR Section 4.6.15(G), affecting setbacks for swimming pools. Attachment: * P&Z Staff Report & Documentation of August 17, 1992 PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT MEETING OF: August 17, 1992 AGENDA ITEM: V.A. Proposed LDR Text Amendment, Section 4. 6.15.G with Cross-Reference to 4.3.4(H)(5) Affecting Setbacks for Swimming Pools ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD The item before the Board is that of making a recommendation to the City Commission on a proposed text amendment which would allow swimming pools to be located to within five feet of a rear or side property line, when such property line is adjacent to at least 50 feet of open space. The amendment would also reduce the minimum street side setback for swimming pools from 15 feet to 10 feet. BACKGROUND In June of this year, the Planning and Zoning Department received a request from Cotleur Hearing, a landscape architect and planning firm, to consider a text amendment which would allow a reduction in swimming pool setbacks under certain conditions. The request was made on behalf of Guardian Companies, the developer of the Clearbrook community. Several lots in Clearbrook abut a Lake Worth Drainage District easement and canal, and the developers, are seeking a means to allow swimming pools to be built to within 5 feet of the property lines abutting that easement. ANALYSIS Section 4.6.15(G) of the Land Development Regulations states that grade level swimming pools must be set back at least 10 feet from any rear or side property line, and must be at least 15 feet from any street right-of-way. Section 4.3.4(H)(5)(b), which deals with the encroachment of screen enclosures into setbacks, states that screen enclosures around pools may have a zero rear yard setback whenever that rear property line abuts at least 50 feet of open space. For the purposes of this section, open space includes areas such as canals, lakes, golf courses, and similar uses which are dedicated to the public or are a part of a residential community's common area. Since the code allows screen enclosures to have a zero setback under these limited circumstances, it is reasonable to allow swimming pools to be built to within 5 feet of that setback, when the same open space conditions apply. The reduced setback will provide greater flexibility to developers and homeowners, without having a negative impact on adjacent property owners. P & Z Staff Repor Regular Meeting of August 17, 1992 Agenda Item V.A. After reviewing the swimming pool setback requirements of several other Palm Beach County municipalities, staff is also proposing that the minimum required street side setback for pools be reduced from 15 feet to 10 feet. This will also allow for greater flexibility in the design and location of swimming pools, and is similar to the requirements of neighboring communities. RECOMMENDED ACTION: By motion, make a recommendation to the City Commission that the proposed amendment to Section 4.6.15(G) regarding swimming pool setbacks be approved. Attachments: * Proposed amendment * Letter from Cotleur Hearin~reque~g amendment Report prepared by: ~¥(~.~''-- -- ' LDR Section 4.6.15 (G) (G) Yard Encroachment: (1) Swimming pools, the tops of which are no higher than grade level, may extend into the rear or side setback area but to no closer than ten feet (10') to any ~ ~ ~ property line, ~ ~~ ~ f~f~ f~ ~;~ ~ ~ ~~ ~Z~f~W~ , except as provided in division (2) below. (2) When adjacent to at least 50 feet of open space, as defined in Section 4.3.4(H)(5)(c) and (d), swimminq pools at grade level may extend into the rear or side setback area but to no closer than five feet (5'). (3) Although swimming pools may extend into side and rear setback areas, a screened or other porch enclosure shall not be permitted to encroach into such setback areas, except as provided in Section 4.3.4(H)(5)(b). MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: CITY MANAGERff~ SUBJECT: A~ENDA ITEM ~ I~ - MEETIN~ OF AUGUST 25. 1992 ORDINANCE NO, 41-92 DATE: August 21, 1992 This is a first reading of an ordinance amending the Subsection 4.6.15(G) "Yard Encroachment" of the Land Development Regulations to allow swimming pools to be located to within five feet of a rear or side yard, when such property line is adjacent to at least 50 feet of open space, and to reduce the minimum street side setback required for swimming pools from 15 feet to 10 feet. This text amendment was initiated at the request of the developers of the Clearbrook residential community, who are seeking additional flexibility in the placement of swimming pools on lots which are adjacent to a Lake Worth Drainage District canal. Currently the LDRs allow screen enclosures for swimming pools to have a zero setback when the property line abuts at least 50 feet of open space. However, that provision does not extend to unscreened swimming pools. The proposed standards are consistent with those of neighboring municipalities, and will provide some additional flexibility in situations where adjacent property owners will not be adversely affected. The Planning and Zoning Board at their August 17th meeting recommended approval of the text amendment. A detailed staff report is attached as backup material for this item. Recommend approval of Ordinance No. 41-92 on first reading. ~N O~DINANCE OF THE CI~Y COM. M~SS~O~ OF THE C~ ~ ~W~ING ~ TO ~ SW~ ~ ~ ~O TQ~WI~ ~VE~ ~EET ~ A R~ SIH ~ ERTY LIN~ ~N S~ ~OKR- ~ ~E~N AD3~ ~TO AT ~D TO RE.CE THE ~TREET tl~ ~T~' F~ 1~ FEET ~ ~ FEET; PRG VlDIK A ~NE~L REaR TI~ ~T~-