Loading...
67-92 ORDINANCE NO. &7-~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA AMENDING SECTION 4.6.7 "SIGNS" OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH BY REPEALING SUB-SUBSECTION 4.6.7(C)(5) "BANNER SIGNS AND FLAGS" AND ENACTING A NEW SUB-SUBSECTION 4.6.7(C)(5), "BANNERS AND WIND SIGNS" TO PROVIDE FOR THE PRO- HIBITION OF BANNER SIGNS AND SIGNS CONSISTING OF FLAGS, PENNANTS, RIBBONS, SPINNERS, STREAMERS, OR BALLOONS; BY ENACTING A NEW SUB-SUBSECTION 4.6.7(E)(8), "FLAGS", TO PROVIDE FOR LIMITING THE NUMBER OF FLAGS ON ANY ONE PARCEL OF LAND TO THREE FLAGS, THE MAXIMUM SIZE OF FLAGS, PROHIBITING THE PLACEMENT OF FLAGS WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND TO PROVIDE FOR THE PLACEMENT OF FLAGS DURING SPECIFIC NATIONAL HOLIDAYS; PROVIDING A REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Delray Beach has invested millions of dollars in installing and maintaining streetscaping and landscaping along the public rights-of-way within Delray Beach; and, WHEREAS, the City of Delray Beach is in the process of imple- menting its Decade of Excellence Bond program which will provide addi- tional funding of drainage, paving, and beautification of rights-of-way within Delray Beach; and, WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach has maintained a strict sign code for a number of years, specifically regulating the use of flags, banners, streamers, and balloons; and, WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach is desirous of providing safe traffic areas for pedestrians, bicyclists, and motor vehicles; and, WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach wishes to improve the aesthetics of commercial and residential properties including the City's rights-of-way within the city limits; and, WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that flags, banners, streamers, balloons, and other types of "wind signs", are signs within the meaning of the City of Delray Beach Code of Ordinances; and, WHEREAS, the use of banners, streamers, other types of "wind signs", and balloons as signs is illegal in Delray Beach and damages the aesthetic quality of our residential and commercial zoned neighborhoods; and, WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that the proliferation of flags on commercial and residential properties damages the aesthetic quality of our residential and commercially zoned neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach believes that improving the aesthetics of Delray Beach's residential and commercial· neighborhoods will improve the quality of life for the citizens of Delray Beach. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Article 4.6, "Supplemental District Regulations", Section 4.6.7, "Signs", Subsection 4.6.7(C), "Prohibited Signs", Sub-subsection 4.6.7(C)(5), "Banner Signs and Flags" of the Land Development Regulations of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, is hereby repealed, and a new Sub-subsection 4.6.7(C)(5), "Banners and Wind Signs" of the Land Development Regulations of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, is hereby enacted to read as follows: 4.6.7(C)(5) Banners and Wind Siqns. (a) Banners - A sign consisting of characters, letters, illustrations or ornamentations attached to cloth, paper, or fabric backing. (b) Wind Signs - Signs, consisting of one or more banners, pennants, ribbons, spinners, streamers, or captive balloons, or other objects or material fastened in such a manner as to move upon being subjected to pressure by wind. Section 2. That Subsection 4.6.7(E), "Sign Design Standards", of the Land Development Regulations of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, be, and the same is amended by enacting a new Sub-subsection 4.6.7(E)(8), "Flags", to read as follows: 4.6.7(E)(8) Flaqs. (a) Number - No more than three flags may be displayed on any one parcel of land, unless the property/lot size is larger than one acre, wherein one flag per 15,000 square feet of property may be displayed, as long as it does not impair visibility or create a site distance problem with regards to pedestrian or vehicular access. ORD. NO. (b) Prohibited in riqhts-of-way - Flags may not be placed in any public right-of-way within the City limits. Public rights-of- way include sidewalks, swales, and alleys. (c) The provisions of this subseCtion relating to the number of flags shall not apply from July 3rd to 5th. (d) For flags greater than three (3) square feet in area, the owner of property shall obtain a permit prior to installing each flag. The cost of each flag permit shall be $10.00. Section 3. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances which are in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 4. That should any section or provision of this ordinance or any portion thereof, any paragraph, sentence, or word be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a whole or part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. Section 5. That this ordinance shall become effective immedi- ately upon its passage on second and final reading; provided, however that the City's formal enforcement measures shall not begin for a period of sixty (60) days. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final reading on this the day of , 199 . MAYOR ATTEST: City Clerk First Reading Second Reading MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSIONERS FROM: ~CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM # I~ - MEETING OF JANUARY 12. 1993 ORDINANCE NO. 67-92 DATE: January 8, 1993 This is the second reading of an ordinance amending the Land Development Regulations by repealing and enacting a new Subsection 4.6.7(C)(5), "Banners and Wind Signs" to provide for the prohibition of banner signs and signs consisting of flags, pennants, ribbons, spinners, streamers, or balloons; and, enacting a new Subsection 4.6.7.(E)(8), "Flags" to provide for limiting the number and maximum size of flags on any one parcel of land, prohibiting the placement of flags within the right-of-way and to provide for the placement of flags during specific national holidays. At the December 16th Special Meeting, several items of concern where discussed with regard to this proposed ordinance. Staff met to address those concerns and comments, some of which have been incorporated into the ordinance before you for final action. The Planning and Zoning Board will formally review this item at their January llth meeting. Their recommendation will be presented at Tuesday evenings meeting. Recommend consideration of Ordinance No. 67-92 on second and final reading, subject to the Planning and Zoning Board's recommendation. CITY COMMISSION DOCUMENTATION TO: AVi~ T. HARDEN, CITY MANAGER FROM: DAVID J. KOVACS, DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: MEETING OF JANUARY 12, 1993 ORDINANCE 67-92, SIGN CODE AMENDMENT RE FLAGS ACTION REQUESTED OF THE COMMISSION: The action requested of the City Commission is that of approval of this proposed ordinance on second and final reading. The ordinance amends that portion of the sign code which deals with the flying of flags. BACKGROUND: This ordinance received first reading on December 15th at a special meeting. At that time several items were raised by Commissioners. A few additional items were raised through staff review prior to review by the Planning and Zoning Board. Please refer to their staff report (attached) for a complete analysis of the subject. The Director of Community Improvement, Director of Planning, and the City Attorney (and staff) met to address the concerns of the Commissioners and the review comments. The Attorney's Office may work on revising the proposed ordinance. If it is determined that the nature of the changes so warrant, it would be appropriate to reject the ordinance as presently written and receive a newly drafted ordinance for first reading consideration on January 26th. PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD CONSIDERATION: The Planning and Zoning Board will formally review this item at its meeting of Monday, January llth. Their recommendation will be presented at the public hearing. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Pending consideration by the Planning and Zoning Board. Attachment: * P&Z Staff Report & Documentation of January 11, 1993 PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEMORANDUM STAFF REPORT REVISED ON JANUARY 8, 1993 MEETING OF: JANUARY 11, 1993 AGENDA ITEM: LDR TEXT AMENDMENT RE BANNER SIGNS AND FLAGS ITEM BEFORE THE BOARD: The item before the Board is that of making a recommendation to the City Commission regarding a proposed change to the LDRs. The changes contemplated in this proposed ordinance include: * deletion of existing provisions pertaining to "Banner Signs and Flags"; * addition of new provisions pertaining to "Banners and Wind Signs"; * deletion of requirement that each allowed flag (three per property) be of different content; * requirements for a special $10 permit for flags which are greater than three sq.ft, in area; * exception for the Fourth of July holiday. BACKGROUND: This item was taken before the City Commission, in the form of proposed Ordinance No. 67-92, for first reading on December 8, 1992. There was considerable discussion which included comments about: * whether or not the three square foot size for determining if a permit is required is appropriate, some thought the size should be greater; -- in consideration of this item the Director of Community Improvement, the Planning Director, and the City Attorney suggest that twelve (12) square feet be the size at which permitting (and permit fees) applies. * since a greater number of flags are allowed on a larger parcel (e.g. 29 flags on a ten acre parcel), might not the regulation be abused? One method of further regulation would be to have minimum spacing requirements; on-the-other-hand, flags are often displayed in a cluster; P&Z Board Memorandum Staff Report LDR Text Amendment Re Banner Signs & Flags Page 2 -- it is suggested that individual flags, when more than three are flown, not be less than 150' from one another except for one cluster of three flags. A cluster would be two or more flags within 150 feet of one another. * would other than national, state, and municipal flags be allowed i.e. corporate logos, etc? -- the answer is yes; however, a flag with business identification information could be considered as a free-standing sign and, thus, would take up the allotment for such signing. TEXT CHANGES: DELETION of existing Section 4.6.7(C)(5): 4.6.7(C) Prohibited Signs: The following signs, or sign features, are prohibited within the City of Delray Beach; however, exceptions as noted herein are allowed. It shall be unlawful for any persons to erect prohibited signs or ~ use prohibited sign features. THE FOLLOWING SUB-SECTION IS TO BE DELETED (5) Banner Signs and Flags: Being a sign having the characters, letters, illustrations, or ornamentations applied to cloth, paper, or fabric or any kind with only the material for a backing including any animated or fluttering device designed to attract attention; except for two flag banners per residential development at times the model home or model apartments ~ are open for inspection; or except the flying of no more than three (3) flags, of which one must be different from the other two, and such flags may only consist of the United States flag, a flag of another nation, a United States State's flag, or a municipal flag; or except for the flags of service and civic clubs when displayed at respective meeting sites during meeting hours; and provided that flag banners shall be limited to an area of fifteen square feet per flag except for temporary banners flown in conjunction with Special Events as provided for in Section 4.6.7(D)(3)(1). P&Z Board Memorandum Staff Report LDR Text Amendment Re Banner Signs & Flags Page 3 ADDITION OF A NEW SECTION 4.6.7(C)(5): (5) Banners and Wind Signs: NOTE: These are prohibited. (a) Banners: A sign consisting of characters, letters, illustrations or ornamentations attached to cloth, paper, or fabric backing. (b) Wind Signs: Signs, consisting of one or more banners, pennants, ribbons, spinners, streamers, or captive balloons, or other objects or material fastened in such a manner as to move upon being subjected to pressure by wind. ADDITION OF A NEW SECTION 4.6.7(E)(8): NOTE: Section (E) pertains to sign design standards and the types of signs to which they apply. (8) Flags: (a) Number: No more than three (3) flags may be displayed on any one parcel of land, unless the property/lot size is larger than one (1) acre, wherein (whereon) one flag per 15,000 square feet of property may be displayed, as long as it does not impair visibility or create a site (sight) problem with regards (regard) to pedestrian or vehicular access. (b) Prohibited in rights-of-way: Flags may not be placed in any public right-of-way within the City limits. Public rights-of-way include sidewalks, swales, and alleys. (c) The provisions of this subsection relating to the number of flags shall not apply from July 3rd to 5th. (d) For flags greater than three (3) square feet in area, the owner of property shall obtain a permit prior to installing each flag. The cost of each flag permit shall be $10.00. ANALYSIS: First, it is noted that the caption of Ordinance No. 67-92 has errors in line nine, use of the word "flags"; and line 13, use of the phrase "the maximum size of flags". P&Z Board Memorandum Staff Report LDR Text Amendment Re Banner Signs & Flags Page 4 Second, it would be more appropriate to include the new sub-section which deals exclusively with "flags" under Section 4.6.7(D)(3) Special Purpose Signs and Signing. Third, by deleting 4.6.7(D)(5), as written, the accommodation of two (2) banners (flags) for model homes/apartments is removed from the LDRs. Consideration should be given to retaining such signing. I do note that "real estate sales" signing and "for lease/rent" signing is still allowed. Fourth, with respect to the "flag" criteria the following comments are provided: 1. Under the "number' provision, the inclusion of information pertaining to sight distance is not appropriate. The sight distance consideration should be handled separately i.e. in a separate sub-section. 2. The provision dealing with not being located within the public right-of-way does not appear necessary since any item placed within the right-of-way is subject to permitting through the City Engineer and there is no provision for use of the public right-of-way for such private purpose. Also, from time-to-time, the City does allow flags to be flown within rights-of-way; thus, including the suggested prohibition in the LDRs may present further problems in equitable enforcement. 3. The provision dealing with the permit fee of $10 for flags exceeding 3 sq.ft, should be rewritten to insure that permits are obtained for flag poles (as structures). Also, the permit fee should be the same as for any other sign application (currently $15). It is suggested that flags less than 3 sq.ft. (or greater area as discussed above) be exempt from paying a permit fee; and, current practice be followed for a sign permit application for flags. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Take this matter under advisement, at a minimum, provide recommendations to: 1. Add the provisions for "flags" to Section 4.6.7(D)(3). 2. Use the standard sign application fee (i.e. no special language is needed) but allow a zero fee for flags less than twelve square feet in area. P&Z Board Memorandum Staff Report LDR Text Amendment Re Banner Signs & Flags Page 5 3. Do not add a specific restriction pertaining to placement in right-of-way (note that such placements are not allowed except under permit of the City Engineer). If this subject is to be addressed anywhere in the LDRs it should be in Section 6.3.1. 4. In addition to any specific standards for flags, a general statement of compliance with sight distance standards, building permits for flag poles, and compliance with height, size, and other applicable provisions which pertain to free-standing signs should be made. 5. Accommodation for two pennants, flags, or banners for subdivision model homes and apartments should be made. Attachments: * Draft of proposed Ordinance with cover memo from Assistant City Attorney Tolces Report prepared Initial report on December 23, 1992 Revised report on January 8, 1993. DJK/PZFLAGS.DOC CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TEL No. 407 278 475~ Dec 10,92 15:33 P.02 i CITY DF DELRII¥ BEI:IgH CITY A1TORNEY'S OFFICE (40T) 243-T090 Date~ Deceed:~er 10~ 1992 To: C1t¥ Commission From: David N. Tolces~ Assist~nt City Attorney~'~ Sub~ect: P~oposed Ordinance Ar~eadin~ Section "Banner~ and Wind Siq~s,_and. 4.6.7(~)(6) "Flags, The a~Cachmt ordinance amends Section 4.6.7(C)($); "Banne~ Signs and Flags". ?he existing ordinance also prohibits "wind signs"/ however, ~he amendmen~ removes ~lags from this section of ~he o:dLnance. . The regu~ation of flags will no~ be placed in Section 4.~.7(E)(8).. ?~e proposed o~dLnance will allow fo~ three flags, of any ~ype, to be flown at all ~lmes on parcels less than orm~ac~e. On parcels g~ea~e~ than one acre~ one flag for each '15~000 square fee~'would bo pe~-ml~ted. Flags may not be placed in ~ights-of-way~ and l~ ~he flag size ~s g~oa~eE than 3 square feet~ a $10 perml~ must be obtained. One exception to ~he o~'dinance ia ~nclu~ed for Independence Day. One day p~lo~ to July 4th and one day after~ p~ope~ty o~ne~s may ~ly as many flags as desire. ~hey must s~ll submit This o~dInance replaces p~evious code p~ovisions whic~ a~e p~esentl¥ being challenged. ?his office believes ~ha~ the proposed ordinance would likely withz~and a constitutional challenge. ~e~ therefore sugges~ adoption of this ordinance on firs~ reading with second reading on Januarlr 12~ 1993. Please call if you have any questions. cc= David ~a~den, City Manages Cheryl Leverett, Agenda Coo£dlna~o~ Lula Bu~ler~ Director of Community Improvement CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TEL No. 407 2?8 4755 Jan 05,95 17:10 P.02 ORDINANCE NO. 67-92 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA AMENDING SECTION 4.6.7 "SIGNS" OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT RE~JLATIONS OF THE CODE OF OF~DINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH BY REPEALING SUB-SUBSECTION 4.6.7(C)(5) "BANNER SIGNS AND FI~AGS" AND ENACTING A NEW SUB-SUBSECTION 4.6.7(C)($), "BANNERS AND WIND SIGNS" TO PROVIDE FOR THE PRO- HIBITION OF BANNER SIGNS AND SIGNS CONSISTING OF PENNANTS, RIBBONS, SPINNEP~, STREAMERS, OR BA~J~OONS; BY ENACTING A NEW SUB-SUBSECTION 4.6.7(E)(8), "FLAGS", TO'PROVIDE FOR LIMITING THE NUMBER OF FLAGS ON ANY ONE PARCEL OE LAND TO THREE FLAGS, PRO- HIBITING THE PLACEMENT OF FLAGS WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND TO PROVIDE FOR THE PLACEMENT OF FLAGS DURING SPECIFIC NATIONAh HOLIDAYS} PROVIDING A REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS' CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS,'"~che City Of Delray Beach has invested millions of dollars In installing and maintaining streetscaplng and landscaping along the ~ublic rights-of-way within Delray Beach~ and, WHEREAS, the C~ty of Delray Beach is in the process of imple- menting its Decade of Excellence Bond program which will provide addL- ~lonal funding of drainage, paving~ and beautificat~on of rights-of-way w~th~n De,ray Beach; WHEREAS, the city Commission of the Clay of Delray Beach has ma~ntained a strict s~gn code for a number of years, specifically regulating the use of flags, banners, streamers, and balloons; and, WHEREAS, the City Commission of the C~ty of Delray Beach is desirous of prov~ding safe traffic areas for pedestrians, and motor vehicles; and, WHEREAS, the City Commission of =he C~t¥ of Delray Beach wishes to ~mprove the aesthetics of commercial and res~dential properties including the City's rights-of-way within the city limits; and, WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that flags, banners~ streamers, balloons, and other types of "wind signs", are signs the meaning of the City of Delray Beac~ Code of Ordinances; and, WHEREAS, the use of banners, streamers, ot~er types of "wind signs", and balloons as signs is illegal in Delray Beach and damages the CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TEL No. 40? 2?8 4?55 Jan 08,95 17:10 P.05 aesthetic quality of our residential and commercial zoned neighborhoods; and, WHEREAS, the City Co~mlssion finds that the proliferation flags on commercial and residential pro~erties damages the aesthetic quality of our residential and commercially zoned neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Delray Beach believes that improving the aesthetics of Delray Beach's residential and commercial neighborhoods will improve the quality of life for the c~tl~ens of Delray Beach. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CXTY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA~ AS FOLLOWS~ Section 1. That Article 4.6, "Supplemental DiStrict Regulations", Section 4.6.7, "signs", S~tbsection 4.6.7(C), "Prohibited Signs", Sub-subsection 4.6.7(C)(5), "Banner Signs and Flags" of the ~and Development Regulations of the Code of Ordinances of the City of De,ray Beach, Florida, is hereby repealed, and a ne~w- Sub-subsection 4.6.7(C)(5), "Banners and Wind Signs" of the hand Development Regulations of the Code Of Ordinances of the hereby enacted to read as follows$ 4.6.7 (t) (5) B__a_Dners and Wind Slqns. (a) Banners - A sign consisting of characters, letters, illustrations or ornamentations attached to cloth, paper, or fabric backing. (b) Wind Signs - Signs, consisting of one or more banners, pennants, ~ibbons, spinners, streamers, or captive balloons, or other objects or material fastened in such a manner as to move upon being subjected to pressure by wind. Section ~... That Subsection 4.6.7(E), "Sign Design Standards", of the Land Development Regulations of the Code of Ordinances of the city of Delray Beach, Florida, be, and the same is amended by enacting a new Sub-subsection 4.6.7(E)(8), "Flags", tO read as follows: 4.6.7(E)(8) Fla~s. (a) Number - No more than three flags may be displayed on any one parcel of land, unless the property/lot size is larger than one acrs, wherein one flag per 15,000 square feet of property may be displayed, as long as it does not impair visibility or create a sight distance problem with regards to pedestrian or vehicular access. 2 ORD. NO. 67-92 CIT.Y~ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TEL No. 40? 2?8 4?$8 3an 08,95 17:11 P.04 (b) Prohibited in rights-of-way - Flags may not be placed in any public right-of-way wfthin the City limits. Public rights-of- way include sidewalks, swales, and alleys. (c) The provisions of this subsection relating to the number of flags shall not apply from July 3rd to 5th. (d) For flags greater than three (3) square .feet in area, the owner of property shall obtain a permit prior to installing each flag. The cost of each flag permit shall be $10.00. Section 3. Tha= a11 ordinances or parts of ordinances which are in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 4. That should any section or provision of .this ordinance or any'p~rtion thereof, any paragraph, sentence, or word be declared by a court of competent Jurisdiction to be XnvaXld, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a whole or part thereof other than the part declared to~ lnva~d. Sec~i.o~..~~. That this ordinance shall become effective immedi- ately upon its passage on second and final reading; ~rovided, however that the City's formal enforcement measures shall not begin for a period of sixty (~0) days. PASSED AND ADOPTED in regular session on second and final reading on :his the day of ............... , 19~ . · MAYOR ATTEST ~ City Clerk First Reading Second Readin~ 3 ORD. NO. 67-92 FLORIDA STATUTES SECTION 63.01, STATE FIRE MARSHAL RULES AS CONTAINED WITHIN FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RULE 4A, ALL AS SHALL BE REVISED OR AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME, AND CERTAIN MINIMUM NATIONAL FIRE SAFETY CODES PRESCRIBED BY THE NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION (NFPA) AS AMENDED HEREIN, SHALL BE INCORPORATED WITHIN THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCES; PROVIDING THAT A VIOLATION OF THE ABOVE-NAMED CODES SHALL BE DEEMED A VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCES IN ORDER TO ENHANCE THE ENFORCEABILITY OF SAID CODES; PROVIDING A GENERAL REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (Copy of Ordinance No. 66-92 is on file in the official Ordinance Book) The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance. A public hearing was held having been legally advertised in compli- ance with the laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the City of Delray Beach, Florida. The .public hearing was closed. Mr. Randolph moved for the adoption of Ordinance No. 66-92 on Second and FINAL Reading, seconded by Dr. Alperin. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mr. Randolph - Yes; Mayor Lynch - Yes; Mr. Mouw - Yes; Dr. Alperin - Yes; Mr. Ellingsworth - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. 10.B. Ordinance No. 67-92. Ordinance No. 67-92, amending the Land Development Regulations by repealing and enacting a new Subsection 4.6.7(C)(5), "Banners and Wind Signs" to provide for the prohibition of banner signs and signs consisting of flags, pennants, ribbons, spinners, streamers or balloons; and, enacting a new Subsection 4.6.7(E) (8), "Flags" to provide for limiting the number and maximum size of flags on any one parcel of land, prohibiting the placement of flags within the right-of-way and to provide for the placement of flags during specific national holidays, is before the Commission for consideration on Second and FINAL Reading. Prior to consideration of passage of this ordinance on Second and FINAL Reading, a public hearing has been scheduled to be held at this time. The City Manager presented Ordinance No. 67-92: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 4.6.7 "SIGNS" OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF DELRAY BEACH BY REPEALING SUB-SUBSEC- TION 4.6.7(C)(5) "BANNER SIGNS AND FLAGS" AND ENACTING A NEW SUB-SUBSECTION 4.6.7(C)(5), "BANNERS AND WIND SIGNS" TO PROVIDE FOR THE PROHIBITION OF BANNER SIGNS AND SIGNS CON- -12- 1/12/93 SISTING OF PENNANTS, RIBBONS, SPINNERS, STREAMERS, OR BALLOONS; BY ENACTING A NEW SUB-SUBSECTION 4.6.7(E)(8), "FLAGS", TO PROVIDE FOR LIMITING THE NUMBER OF FLAGS ON ANY ONE PARCEL OF LAND TO THREE FLAGS, PRO- HIBITING THE PLACEMENT OF FLAGS WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND TO PROVIDE FOR THE PLACE- MENT OF FLAGS DURING SPECIFIC NATIONAL HOLI- DAYS; PROVIDING A REPEALER CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING 'AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The City Attorney read the caption of the ordinance. A public hearing was held having been legally advertised in compli- ance with the laws of the State of Florida and the Charter of the City of Delray Beach, Florida. The City Attorney stated that the Planning and Zoning Board considered this item on January 11, 1993, and there may be some changes. It is his understanding that this ordinance may go back to First Reading on January 26, 1993. David Kovacs, Planning Director, stated the first time this came before the Commission for First Reading, the Commission raised several points that needed to be looked at. Upon a re- view, other technical items were discovered that needed to be handled differently. Mr. Kovacs reviewed the proposals and the recommendations made by the Planning and Zoning Board, including the standard size of flags, type and permit fees. The City Attorney advised, if the Commission directs that the ordinance be redrafted and brought back for First Read- ing, there is no need for a Public Hearing at this time. Mr. Mouw moved that the ordinance be sent back to staff for rewriting and that it be brought back for First Reading as soon as possible, seconded by Dr. Alperin. Upon roll call the Commission voted as follows: Mayor Lynch - Yes; Mr. Mouw - Yes; Dr. Alperin - Yes; Mr. Ellingsworth - Yes; Mr. Randolph - Yes. Said motion passed with a 5 to 0 vote. Before roll call Mayor Lynch declared a recess, the time being 7:15 P.M.; the meeting reconvened at 7:35 P.M. Mayor Lynch announced that, when an issue has been dropped because the ordinance is being changed, there is nothing for the Commission to vote on; however, in fairness to the number of persons who have come to this meeting, he will allow three people to speak for three minutes. John Prescott, owner of the Shell Station, stated he is speaking in opposition to the current flag ordinance in the City. He requested that the existing ordinance be amended to exclude -13- 1/12/93 the American flag as it should be allowed to be displayed on any property at any time. Barry Silver, attorney, stated that his client, John Prescott, has been fined and he feels it is wrong to penalize him for his patriotism. In his opinion, the ordinance in its current form is unconstitutional. Rabbi Sam Silver stated he is speaking on behalf of the Jewish War Veterans, in addition to the American Legion, the DAV, the Veterans of Foreign Wars, the Catholic Veterans and for all those people who agree with the statement made by the distin- guished attorney. He feels this Country and this community could stand more patriotism and more loyalty to America than less. Frank Mankowitz, 909 Bond Way, expressed his opposition to charging a fee for the purpose of flying the American flag. At this time the roll was called to the motion. At this point Mayor Lynch declared a three (3) minute recess, in order to clear.the Chambers. 11, Comments and Inquiries on Non-Agenda Items from the PubliG. ll.A. City Manager. 11.A.%, The City Manager reminded the Commission and the public that a Town Meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, January 19th at 7:00 P.M. in the auditorium at Old School Square. An Annual Report on the status of the Comprehensive Plan will be presented after which the Public will be invited to make comments. ll.B. From the Public. 11.~.1. Charles Ridle¥, on behalf of MAD DADS, thanked the City Commission for the attitude that the Commission has helped set in this community, specifically in the west section of Delray. The staff has worked very closely with MAD DADS, making it possible for a number of things to happen. At a recent meeting that was held with the citizens from 9th Avenue, several issues surfaced, as follows: a request to place lights on 9th Avenue, additional police surveillance and that dumpsters be moved to the rear of the apartment complex. In order to move the dumpsters, the alleyway had to be paved. All of these things are now underway, thanks to a lot of people. He expressed the hope that this good work will continue. ll.B.2. Lillian Feldman, resident, stated she feels it is a shame for anyone who is in business in Delray Beach to find it necessary to bring persons from out-of-town to speak for them and advise them of their rights; and further, that the City of Delray -14- 1/12/93 DEC 1 0 [lTV DF DELI:II:IV BEIiI:H CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE ~' '~'~ ~' '~' ~"^¥ "~'~' ~°~* ~" FACSIMILE 407/278-4755 ~'&'~.~ ' -. D.%='~. (407) 243-7090 MEMORANDUM Date: December 10, 1992 To: City Commission From: David N. Tolces, Assistant City Attorney~ Subject: Proposed Ordinance Amending Section 4.6.7(C)(5) "Banners and Wind Signst and 4.6.7(E)(8) "Flaqs" The attached ordinance amends Section 4.6.7(C)(5), "Banner Signs and Flags". The existing ordinance also prohibits "wind signs"; however, the amendment removes flags from this section of the ordinance. The regulation of flags will now be placed in Section 4.6.7(E)(8). The proposed ordinance will allow for three flags, of any type, to be flown at all times on parcels less than one acre. On parcels greater than one acre, one flag for each '15,000 square feet would be permitted. Flags may not be placed in rights-of-way, and if the flag size is greater than 3 square feet, a $10 permit must be obtained. One exception to the ordinance is included for Independence Day. One day prior to July 4th and one day after, property owners may fly as many flags as desire. They must still submit the required permit fee. This ordinance replaces previous code provisions which are presently being challenged. This office believes that the proposed ordinance would likely withstand a constitutional challenge. We therefore suggest adoption of this ordinance on first reading with second reading on January 12, 1993. Please call if you have any questions. DNT:sh cc: David Harden, City Manager -- [ID Cheryl Leverett, Agenda Coordinatoruv [~ ~ Lula Butler, Director of Community Improvement RATON~'DELRAY BOYNTON BEA£tt~' DFFREI~LD McR Boca Baton, Palm Beach County, Florida c~,, ~.,,. ,... ,,,. ..... PREVENTiOn; F~REWORKS' AND ~1~1~ OF THE Cl~ OF ~LRAY TEA ~, 'FIRE SAFETY AND EMER. TtON ~.7 ~GN~", OF THE LAND mG SECTIOS %16. 'CERTaiN THE CO~E OF CAdeNCES OF ager of The News, daily newspapers pub- co~s ~oo~.~ ,~ ~. lished NANCES OF THE CFTY OF DELRAY 4~.7(C)(~ ~ANNER SIGNS AND ~on ~e~ch CO,ES ~DOPTED BY REFER. 'BANNERS AND WIND SlGN~' TO ENCE*, TO PROVIDE THAT UNh PR~I~ FOR THE PR~IBITI~ ment was published in said newspapers in ~o,~ m~ SAFETY CODES, ES- OF SANNE. S,ONS AND SIGNS TABL)SH~D BY FLORIDA STAT- C~SJST~ MARSHAL RULES AS CONTAINED STR~ERS, .OR ~LL~S; WITHIN FLORIDA ADM~NISTRA- ENACTING A NEW  TWE CODE RULE 4A, ALL AS SHALL BE ~EVISED OR AMENDED 'F~G$', TO PR~IOE ~ LiMiT- FRO~ Tt~E TO T(ME, AND CEA. lNG THE NUMBER OF F~ ON TAIN MINIMUM NATIONAL FIRE ANY ONE PAR~L SAFETY C00ES PRESCRIBED BY THREE F~GS, THE ~IMU~ THE NATIONAL FI~E PROTECTION SIZE OF F~GS, PR~IBITI~ THE ASS~iATION (NFP~ AS AMEN~ P~CE~NT ~ F~S WITHIN ED HEREIN, SHALL BE INCOR~ ~BLIC ~IGHT~Ay AgD TO RATED WITHIN THE CITY'S CODE PROVIDE FOR THE P~ENT OF ORDINANCES; PROVIDING OF THAT A WO~TiON OF THE TIONAL ~LiDAY$; PROVIDING A ABOVE-N~MEO CODES SHALL BE REPEALER C~USE; ~IDING DEEMED A VIOLATION OF CITY A ~VINGS C~USE; PROVIDING ORDINANCES IN ORDER TO EN- ANEFFECTIVEDATE, MANCE THE ENFORCEABILITY OF Affiant further says that The News is a ~,~ c0o~,. ,,o~,o,.o ~ o~,. ViO~N5 A SAVING CLAUSE; PR~ ~ ~ t~ Ci~ C~ wiffire Palm Beach second class matter at the post office in ,.o,o,.,.c~o~,,~c,,,c--~,ss~o, oF ,.~ o,, 0F OELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA, ~END~NG. SEC. ~ooa Palm for a period of one year next preceding the ~ ~o~ o~ o.~,...c~s o~ ~ OT~ OF OEL~AY 8EACH 8Y first publication of the attached copy of .EP~ALi"G SU~SUBSECTION tB.?{C)ID '~ANNER SIG~S AND advertisement; and affiant further says that ~:A~r ~ ~,,C~O ' ~ SU~SU~SECT~O~ 4,6,7(C) (5), PUBLISh: ~e~ ~1, paid nor promised any .,,,.E,s AND WIND SIGNS' TO THENE~ he has neither PROVIDE FOR THE pROHIBITION person, firm or corporation any discount, ~o.,,,~,.o o, ~o~, ,ANTS. RIBBONS. SPINNERS. rebate, commission or refund for the put- ,,,~e,s, o, ,,~:~.,; ,, ENACTING A NEW lioation in said newspapers. ,,o THE NUMBER OF F~GS ON THREE F~GS, THE ~XlMUM p~CE~E~T OF F~GS W~THIN PUbLiC R~GHT~F-WAY AHO TO  PROVIDE FOR THE p~CEMENT OF F~GS DURING SPECIFIC N~ TONAL HOLIDAYS; PRO~O~ ~ REPEALER 'CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS C~USE; P~OVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Sworn to and subscribed before me this ~' ~" ~''' '' P,S, ~.~1~, THE Commis